{"meta":{"query_hash":"b8afe4694597","filters":{"topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence"},"cohort_total":1849,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":1849,"exported":1849,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b8afe4694597","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Criminal+Law+and+Evidence"},"results":[{"id":"W1011321566","doi":"","title":"Canadian Fundamental Justice and U.S. Due Process: Two Models for a Guarantee of Basic Adjudicative Fairness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Function (biology); Economic Justice; Process (computing); Constitutional right; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022103056163389728,"score_gpt":0.3240392176661477,"score_spread":0.3019361615027579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1011321566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04612562,0.006018213,0.046388917,0.057900324,0.0005476997,0.00021868417,0.0005900887,0.00015871575,0.84205174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93241453,0.0026841077,0.015651157,0.005100765,0.00021431902,0.00016674795,0.00014724917,0.000054188025,0.043567035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864985,0.0023636343,0.00032756262,0.0014268445,0.0059694997,0.0034140882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929516,0.0026306629,0.00068068365,0.00088779244,0.002144733,0.0007045147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008967778,0.0007803917,0.001205786,0.0028362721,0.012676481,0.009836425,0.0031481648,0.0064619156,0.008226219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023187645,0.00075660116,0.0014242681,0.0033293606,0.023356747,0.007232318,0.004074826,0.0074488656,0.0006272425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032590685,0.0000021171213,0.000078453726,0.0000052152927,0.0000012235034,0.000009256823,0.00024678637,0.00030837,0.000015897791,0.9979359,0.00049235346,0.000901188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007411373,0.000025515084,0.0024636206,0.00014519498,0.000030820393,0.000057385736,0.0005315255,0.006401231,0.00014059996,0.9342989,0.055753157,0.0000779149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9122002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91656697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10963773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10963773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11513711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79548115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1012675263","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-48807-3_13","title":"The Noninteger Powers x v","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.0498016887190147,"score_gpt":0.31004797011928037,"score_spread":0.2602462814002657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012675263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008651453,0.0018284941,0.0025672405,0.003625513,0.00043475156,0.000028501832,0.000027247108,0.000023053966,0.9906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030124329,0.0010322729,0.0010225683,0.003162541,0.0003646146,0.00009763768,0.00002535645,0.000048240858,0.9641225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896955,0.0003344369,0.000035711622,0.00020407718,0.00029896956,0.00015714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991622,0.000437249,0.00003633678,0.00012386577,0.00019132742,0.000049072227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015167313,0.00061799766,0.00048418102,0.0007748259,0.003401893,0.0058971397,0.0010609915,0.0035628325,0.029283887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032643666,0.0004637564,0.00030110744,0.0006087402,0.007816436,0.0051150587,0.0022912866,0.0074969158,0.0082919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015370665,0.0000030939227,0.000019161904,0.00000829419,6.293267e-7,0.000013401861,0.00020140529,0.000020258856,0.000016416467,0.97511566,0.019475546,0.005124604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004698812,0.00000677582,0.00016491409,0.000095731375,0.0000028268507,0.0000793725,0.00023738673,0.00015879443,0.00016679727,0.49351615,0.5055594,0.0000072752605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064604683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010971239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029283887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031331778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003161965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09796435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101276832","doi":"","title":"The Deep Structure of Roncarelli v Duplessis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitution; Public law; Common law; Constitutional law; Statute; Judicial review; Judicial discretion","score_opus":0.016868314041546123,"score_gpt":0.26957536089354744,"score_spread":0.2527070468520013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101276832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0143451765,0.004640831,0.0058220336,0.22641595,0.004690584,0.00039926995,0.0004169028,0.00019103316,0.74307823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50176734,0.0020498086,0.0063757002,0.30978328,0.0047312113,0.00088529347,0.00023408933,0.00018006098,0.17399323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873992,0.0020688209,0.0004064132,0.0031069743,0.0046881707,0.0023303363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581593,0.0015090709,0.00025065907,0.00039531998,0.0012327039,0.00079632027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008893809,0.0005749278,0.00089249015,0.0018102885,0.011614253,0.008152874,0.0036415553,0.015520491,0.006631758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017057521,0.0009343557,0.0006652463,0.0011798396,0.023082059,0.0051478855,0.0046712332,0.024534296,0.0016375388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014660338,0.0000099176,0.00018901213,0.000024245799,0.0000055205815,0.00014011965,0.0013056777,0.000032318283,0.00016301092,0.94006974,0.053036403,0.0050094314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006939662,0.0000679065,0.0018012489,0.00043992355,0.000039258524,0.0003706231,0.0009262212,0.0005117141,0.000932193,0.27347842,0.72125727,0.000105872125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18850449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26831612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18850449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01901772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022864254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3748145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102111148","doi":"","title":"P. Béliveau, M. Vauclair. \"Traité général de preuve et de procédure pénales\".","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.027499393336718022,"score_gpt":0.30168254457846216,"score_spread":0.27418315124174414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102111148","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069001103,0.5402346,0.0243334,0.20252317,0.021009924,0.00036091465,0.004938023,0.00095033407,0.19874947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20854096,0.31200066,0.031148214,0.076633185,0.016843656,0.0013600417,0.002469359,0.0008664876,0.35013744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965295,0.0009413905,0.0002611949,0.00032823853,0.0016038718,0.0003358139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98999816,0.006296466,0.0003872223,0.00023036018,0.002865806,0.0002219787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002979099,0.0012529304,0.0009997598,0.0051523736,0.005693949,0.003017941,0.0034882906,0.009802483,0.018943565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014066927,0.00076172926,0.001413688,0.004802183,0.002521255,0.0030109459,0.0016564155,0.007854075,0.00853154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815511,0.000094123716,0.001325621,0.0006124838,0.000034512803,0.00043870538,0.0016898693,0.00036174819,0.0002444988,0.08751678,0.8129046,0.0945956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076169534,0.00011222355,0.021483587,0.0016162187,0.0001026693,0.0007229542,0.001307163,0.0006949835,0.0014158443,0.05431582,0.9180427,0.00010977371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14968283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17159626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14968283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003045962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041871443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29762316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103650110","doi":"","title":"Judicial Deference to Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Its History and Future","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Adjudication","score_opus":0.07450710772692355,"score_gpt":0.3185725959454522,"score_spread":0.24406548821852864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103650110","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32143784,0.10732543,0.0014063845,0.45381728,0.0024752922,0.00012435154,0.001950953,0.00013078694,0.11133168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92568946,0.028831974,0.00093444774,0.018653423,0.0006431225,0.000032582197,0.00036778083,0.00005870475,0.024788542],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039465,0.00090516085,0.0002991928,0.00083440426,0.0033251361,0.0042414833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468863,0.009014761,0.0039772145,0.000854609,0.027525341,0.011741706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067062327,0.0004163224,0.0010493826,0.0074991765,0.022126429,0.015903033,0.0057422533,0.0063650208,0.00804711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04211239,0.0007675992,0.0005693416,0.013985447,0.01601594,0.003714675,0.00433172,0.009139221,0.0003721187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029430373,0.00038898995,0.09570293,0.0012816914,0.00016599896,0.0014463663,0.042198375,0.001771282,0.00044024645,0.31930038,0.1985638,0.33844563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011494137,0.00012830124,0.28842327,0.0033544744,0.00021314915,0.0005928285,0.05513761,0.00231519,0.00054314116,0.032689635,0.6160108,0.00047669918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99724907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24902919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24902919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4695014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8710197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1036582426","doi":"","title":"Arresting developements in Canada: arrest warrants and mareva injunctions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lloyd's maritime and commercial law quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02053901811546427,"score_gpt":0.2786765007738661,"score_spread":0.2581374826584018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1036582426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93559724,0.0042029335,0.00024852462,0.015188144,0.00016331255,0.00013064704,0.0036738089,0.00003767216,0.04075774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98452777,0.0014607024,0.00018320097,0.0011719669,0.000036831934,0.00001953495,0.00059477694,0.000013399671,0.011991737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951143,0.00028440694,0.00019516825,0.00028866835,0.0014030916,0.0027142556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830168,0.0033774737,0.0029421675,0.00033002067,0.006653393,0.0036802022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022978603,0.00040768483,0.0006963086,0.003565974,0.008264353,0.0045595774,0.0031635992,0.0037593117,0.008909135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022159059,0.0006078343,0.0009091014,0.005288737,0.0023234575,0.0016714314,0.002215563,0.0058381646,0.00041372588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008772288,0.0006665832,0.8410904,0.00028442036,0.00032789682,0.001554198,0.008181036,0.0034235122,0.00029246105,0.03677937,0.0615154,0.04500759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013785747,0.00016916427,0.92800444,0.00035043326,0.00048948324,0.00033273862,0.028158953,0.005049701,0.00036164274,0.0032888171,0.0334824,0.00017438654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99947304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098193206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098193206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16120854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7124449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104895083","doi":"","title":"Understanding Canadian Health & Safety Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17999776635710504,"score_gpt":0.3618470343098047,"score_spread":0.18184926795269965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104895083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016926339,0.00658268,0.005110978,0.23701158,0.00061661156,0.0001071691,0.00075249444,0.000087032364,0.7328051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79961497,0.010851819,0.008488582,0.028070133,0.0003972221,0.00018406431,0.0007465892,0.00012589259,0.15152082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157,0.0016973211,0.00019576302,0.0005992668,0.0028264145,0.0031113087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000335,0.0029321485,0.0003408562,0.00035579462,0.0052154106,0.0011525003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073967827,0.0011873302,0.0008248601,0.009772185,0.029692415,0.026324663,0.0046641994,0.007918907,0.02850466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017323075,0.0010885374,0.0012005692,0.006952329,0.024294328,0.008192613,0.0052246964,0.0071069123,0.0013106806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008210855,0.000016679496,0.001296746,0.000060670696,0.000013836731,0.00009826362,0.009467799,0.0006978924,0.00005649956,0.92851555,0.049062658,0.010705181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023408407,0.000011942558,0.008486025,0.00070151297,0.00007394227,0.00010330185,0.04425653,0.0025841035,0.00020360507,0.3813832,0.56206316,0.000109247296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6477184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.35228154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3604618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110013805","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Principles in Substantive Criminal Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Public law; Constitutionalism; Proportionality (law); Criminal justice; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Theory of criminal justice; Comparative law; Criminal procedure; Democracy","score_opus":0.046645919272257086,"score_gpt":0.31247206400690913,"score_spread":0.26582614473465205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110013805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013751753,0.02474632,0.10998499,0.061882325,0.0014711487,0.0002214852,0.00026795518,0.00018751959,0.7874865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84024334,0.010108644,0.050259788,0.016601175,0.0024878508,0.00090793346,0.0002959913,0.00017289737,0.078922406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900041,0.0045041936,0.0004479525,0.0014162912,0.0024847477,0.0011426695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952459,0.0030702525,0.00025138602,0.0005734682,0.00061743753,0.00024162949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011485947,0.0005725021,0.0006706754,0.0019347472,0.0070786364,0.009866063,0.0019454206,0.004839559,0.0055216476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011511675,0.0006077248,0.00077790616,0.0017931961,0.04325186,0.007726785,0.0041970513,0.008364658,0.000888151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1061046e-7,0.000001327626,0.0000095243295,0.0000041137137,4.232395e-7,0.000004654075,0.00016606157,0.00004630237,0.0000066654084,0.9987903,0.00037844127,0.00059190526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043851737,0.00000372564,0.00005723986,0.000037190854,0.000001553955,0.000012783527,0.00013538296,0.00012840718,0.000030569146,0.96185666,0.03772832,0.000003832444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015102154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010077298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015102154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012069496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011385327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08757073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11296928","doi":"10.29173/alr380","title":"The Unprincipled Use of Originalism and Section 24(2) of the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Charter; Originalism; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Foundation (evidence); Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11695368785822897,"score_gpt":0.34910727004004066,"score_spread":0.2321535821818117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11296928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020184401,0.027665,0.07629101,0.31871107,0.009909884,0.0003203173,0.00049245683,0.00023066245,0.54619527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7129427,0.010911325,0.04322273,0.13939296,0.0055883215,0.0005428213,0.0002047304,0.00015226028,0.08704213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661697,0.0102316225,0.0018312354,0.004561164,0.0147108035,0.0024955678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96135527,0.02456535,0.004294172,0.0032600241,0.0057665957,0.00075867365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02804211,0.000727211,0.00092985795,0.0024454228,0.0065706866,0.012974961,0.003998388,0.01013951,0.0024497632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064004816,0.00074513553,0.00132635,0.0019571055,0.0629284,0.0077491286,0.0045758183,0.015264676,0.0009586461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063053653,0.0000032289533,0.00007053278,0.000029444021,0.0000036204315,0.000029055454,0.0005777706,0.000058211106,0.00003962663,0.9915445,0.005028114,0.002609622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025171441,0.00007308076,0.0007771316,0.000493322,0.00003472145,0.00022850971,0.00067399576,0.00035385796,0.00071354804,0.70354456,0.29300895,0.00007313856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070156336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08945804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92984366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017257595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036275778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14830261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134600537","doi":"10.71781/2096","title":"L'admission des confessions et le risque d'erreur judiciaire : toute vérité est-elle bonne à dire ?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.074205232566288,"score_gpt":0.386992971778698,"score_spread":0.31278773921241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134600537","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.260941,0.017882098,0.0058438256,0.37146702,0.0022889944,0.00007789285,0.0001333465,0.000075691714,0.34129012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95717126,0.0037616792,0.0005569237,0.01516261,0.0009666399,0.000048702863,0.00004775317,0.00004721182,0.022237265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633678,0.01918963,0.0011563958,0.0018782249,0.008133905,0.0062739984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91909564,0.04289997,0.0134128025,0.0038167287,0.010733967,0.010040926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019779103,0.0004816417,0.00081246725,0.0031178868,0.01586989,0.020751914,0.002920745,0.010261214,0.014076446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10747649,0.0005570825,0.0006231002,0.0023868834,0.036896743,0.010488655,0.0127104055,0.016209941,0.0019354214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007455192,0.000102758,0.028695187,0.00013479052,0.000039492745,0.00088932103,0.07520789,0.0001706779,0.00015107113,0.81514657,0.026581012,0.052806657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009135739,0.00017414302,0.07669866,0.0030263225,0.00008713959,0.0026348166,0.13805962,0.0012335848,0.00081233605,0.49727893,0.2796675,0.00023556585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04217379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042290714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04217379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009513881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016873406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10460311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1157515190","doi":"","title":"Les sanctions d'une règle de droit législative incompatible avec la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés: le reading in, le reading down, l'interprétation large, l'interprétation atténuée, etc.!","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Reading (process); Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010672089932790554,"score_gpt":0.22717949051902464,"score_spread":0.21650740058623408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1157515190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06859935,0.017263472,0.009981233,0.24853213,0.005878224,0.00013520579,0.0014650907,0.00035050037,0.6477948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75380206,0.0056766327,0.0042668846,0.019030038,0.0015538901,0.00015257466,0.0003990956,0.00030918064,0.21480969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899497,0.0030139342,0.0003979446,0.000791433,0.00340071,0.0024462554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989379,0.0041673356,0.0014071936,0.00091493985,0.003574417,0.00055713597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007227257,0.0005696081,0.00060036185,0.0015107746,0.0070516155,0.00971264,0.0014913958,0.005179278,0.021587467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03383769,0.0007932573,0.0007796476,0.0022265243,0.0057091736,0.0049015107,0.0022821417,0.007889219,0.0028552767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098212935,0.000027581025,0.004700603,0.00015534187,0.000039815426,0.00034891162,0.004939686,0.0004315676,0.000503934,0.8503515,0.10497674,0.03342608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008590954,0.000108414395,0.045073003,0.0013603639,0.00014926711,0.00047663134,0.009215589,0.0010203669,0.0027072912,0.09950124,0.8400298,0.0002720113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3148402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46171287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6851598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008362118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01678272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62601525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1160208503","doi":"","title":"Privacy Law in Quebec – Substantially Similar but Different?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Business; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03534685976345713,"score_gpt":0.302771382965586,"score_spread":0.26742452320212884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1160208503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42249468,0.032105308,0.0018127381,0.32463074,0.0012413117,0.00018042455,0.0039865337,0.00010849043,0.21343987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92586005,0.0037086809,0.0012345776,0.030365722,0.00016387635,0.00004893113,0.0005528902,0.000037189537,0.038028065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433064,0.0010984136,0.00025339835,0.0006277108,0.001664975,0.0020249095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898572,0.0022134003,0.00068972894,0.0004968916,0.0049006804,0.0018421964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004522451,0.00021964384,0.00062893657,0.0023159634,0.008779366,0.008880189,0.002275038,0.0047615836,0.008326402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128087625,0.00036565555,0.00080944615,0.0038228398,0.0055099716,0.0028466713,0.0016282583,0.0042558922,0.00034971503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030981796,0.0003062581,0.11655502,0.000430975,0.00052855123,0.0021670682,0.010458073,0.0029339534,0.0015641275,0.63148856,0.14034311,0.092914484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015777243,0.00012635706,0.6108108,0.0011869626,0.00040460695,0.0006779227,0.021889048,0.0034951058,0.0008298798,0.033653505,0.32641843,0.00034948206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99552155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11574241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11574241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16569018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8397739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116898662","doi":"","title":"Oversight of regulations by parliamentarians","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Process (computing); Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018489391304202685,"score_gpt":0.3008221842825642,"score_spread":0.2823327929783615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116898662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083867,0.08711709,0.10491558,0.26607814,0.014867305,0.005830794,0.0008782257,0.0014555627,0.43499032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64635915,0.0356995,0.09080395,0.11320875,0.0069491104,0.0031320483,0.0008631503,0.00074504846,0.10223932],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5847018,0.19576794,0.054369397,0.027894258,0.12514457,0.012121969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.421313,0.25947258,0.04712513,0.057188302,0.20566472,0.009236223],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26942354,0.00073909876,0.0018029655,0.013753157,0.011532574,0.013822906,0.004029254,0.0047529237,0.002883083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34665495,0.0017600609,0.0011321875,0.010129378,0.011640364,0.0058763926,0.0064101685,0.008219825,0.0012126646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025573757,0.00008465142,0.014647152,0.0041281907,0.00046982503,0.0008957763,0.038787268,0.0010903255,0.008480206,0.31693467,0.16772652,0.44649968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000890848,0.000080486934,0.012067539,0.0031304304,0.00022019554,0.00039363635,0.0035807637,0.0010749936,0.005530141,0.025384627,0.9483192,0.00012876773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10037086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14046046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96693647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033063516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12641603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9009308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1198391","doi":"10.1136/thx.30.5.528","title":"Hubert Reid, claire Carrier. \"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et doctrine\".","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017139067819786264,"score_gpt":0.29459102472406995,"score_spread":0.2774519569042837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1198391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00562122,0.1891789,0.0019489173,0.25576904,0.037879717,0.0005301406,0.004197485,0.0005255141,0.50434905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05754062,0.035569016,0.0022222411,0.057626795,0.003341972,0.0003876184,0.0012039328,0.0001570306,0.84195083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967609,0.0006868072,0.00024392884,0.00031390126,0.0014610487,0.0005334266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949911,0.0015322806,0.00031051403,0.0002691599,0.0023565139,0.0005404088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034465247,0.00077079353,0.000519069,0.0022568784,0.0048660454,0.0022109593,0.0020935356,0.007930896,0.04928251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011279296,0.00052354357,0.00042304955,0.0021170015,0.0031466403,0.0012838335,0.00152812,0.004739816,0.009574355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012521722,0.0000109575285,0.00069132465,0.000110048066,0.0000041540775,0.00019007022,0.0005219542,0.000048856917,0.000064733664,0.025271626,0.93386805,0.039205644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006037988,0.0000065626546,0.004562155,0.00036082405,0.0000033999459,0.00016941022,0.00031019276,0.00006686048,0.0000454543,0.0014249578,0.9930275,0.000016621063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8031566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85989654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19684339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017343225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024802186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3960052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122484647","doi":"","title":"Rationalizing Similar Facts: A Comment on R. v. Handy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Rationalization (economics); Convict; Law; Value (mathematics); Reasonable doubt; Jury; Character (mathematics); Criminal trial; Verdict; Federal Rules of Evidence; Admissible evidence; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.034232438337659044,"score_gpt":0.32472442659687745,"score_spread":0.2904919882592184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122484647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008606831,0.0053816168,0.0023196405,0.90837187,0.005253581,0.00016971362,0.0004756494,0.00019145139,0.069229685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062522344,0.0020106398,0.0016877964,0.9069263,0.005376802,0.00013242973,0.00011553204,0.00009622375,0.02113203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754607,0.00397907,0.0012203541,0.0052112327,0.0075774845,0.0065510687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698509,0.020487092,0.0012300436,0.0014332966,0.0055086114,0.0014900345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021142391,0.0015012901,0.002773548,0.0022238682,0.023471793,0.014332173,0.013161405,0.116723426,0.0074448516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048468765,0.0020305794,0.0049593947,0.0028689995,0.034427892,0.008316719,0.004980504,0.07174836,0.0022562537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016691496,0.000046155383,0.00095189264,0.00015468236,0.00010091535,0.0014346335,0.005723264,0.0006008013,0.0004964237,0.628302,0.35558355,0.0064387303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005038735,0.00009465371,0.0032430515,0.0011674167,0.00033385845,0.00073344,0.00673986,0.0018538566,0.0014252249,0.25220788,0.73115754,0.00053929316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8135911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82679784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8135911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04932663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0728922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3750133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1227982871","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Aboriginal Law in Canada: On the net","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; RSS; Law; Key (lock); Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.18732428310621058,"score_gpt":0.424469577641156,"score_spread":0.23714529453494543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1227982871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002688024,0.012066466,0.0022631353,0.03617005,0.002839141,0.0026991353,0.30212903,0.003965983,0.6351789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008639151,0.019853791,0.008253794,0.007297133,0.0004530962,0.0017102445,0.069517665,0.0013125843,0.8829626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979175,0.00015417841,0.00012756146,0.000113921385,0.0013178095,0.0003691004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97714853,0.002557791,0.00051160547,0.00041024786,0.016490158,0.0028816848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020930027,0.00093240367,0.0009175259,0.008566341,0.008016888,0.0050433585,0.002092197,0.0023623842,0.23387717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01126285,0.0010479864,0.00062024675,0.020663153,0.0013873838,0.0027897432,0.0015953971,0.0019966348,0.07325397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035133314,0.000009915598,0.00023893149,0.00017092445,0.0000010788708,0.000016466802,0.00024392437,0.000037350514,0.000020250265,0.00050484977,0.9800065,0.018746268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125624,0.000008191545,0.006793877,0.00067906285,0.00000819028,0.000027612503,0.0019742784,0.000065959066,0.00005789019,0.00054544077,0.9897949,0.00003195229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23387717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034863956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19170097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78239703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123169991","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2543-0_7","title":"Privacy Impact Assessments in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law, governance and technology series","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Toolbox; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Range (aeronautics); Privacy by Design; Business; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.024180525692469222,"score_gpt":0.28993600147874166,"score_spread":0.26575547578627245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123169991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5040233,0.022920726,0.004580939,0.029881377,0.00050737575,0.0006342457,0.02825127,0.0004421651,0.4087586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8445519,0.008430519,0.0053499904,0.0032000162,0.000061718994,0.00013969513,0.0054362672,0.00013807528,0.13269174],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99069804,0.0006521275,0.00034456362,0.00048206106,0.0062029497,0.0016201072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98783827,0.0015096837,0.00039060885,0.0002237604,0.009068142,0.00096945564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047730543,0.00044358807,0.00069240277,0.0088933855,0.008767871,0.0063948827,0.0020640907,0.0013438322,0.006169135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014825595,0.0005288263,0.0009987858,0.017369876,0.0018210271,0.001366576,0.0020141744,0.0019991884,0.00046665166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042934963,0.00034136785,0.20833704,0.00088080193,0.00037217938,0.00090754824,0.009174837,0.01977846,0.00063856546,0.2025904,0.24449144,0.312058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009364765,0.00016465796,0.54717684,0.0012317954,0.00035514362,0.0002706876,0.017825363,0.015023459,0.0021556118,0.016164823,0.39922816,0.00030985457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21538287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21538287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29760325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91004467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1247556158","doi":"","title":"Statutory Interpretation in the Courtroom, the Classroom, and Canadian Legal Literature","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory law; Legal writing; Political science; Legal research; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010599834158756457,"score_gpt":0.28274535101202625,"score_spread":0.27214551685326976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1247556158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039641105,0.04036546,0.0038539302,0.1585206,0.001531132,0.000056206758,0.00019855698,0.000093962044,0.7557391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260605,0.022365084,0.0019560205,0.015365791,0.00068023324,0.000054534954,0.00012304581,0.000102166385,0.033292644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818288,0.004564861,0.00046505904,0.0014200837,0.0077784313,0.0039427797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98449105,0.007282906,0.00085183803,0.00057099183,0.0051938402,0.0016094056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009824626,0.00063895754,0.0008827245,0.0075508994,0.047232088,0.022026245,0.004423371,0.0076194718,0.008362909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023740293,0.00062782137,0.000595797,0.013100664,0.08778086,0.0071722353,0.0054231687,0.011303624,0.00052419846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055206283,0.000013862481,0.00044839006,0.000053255128,0.0000027645015,0.00010868636,0.020685222,0.00017000004,0.000032025702,0.954098,0.0143948365,0.00998739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024271749,0.000016160284,0.0073447367,0.00155441,0.000031846244,0.00021208702,0.061284468,0.0009960289,0.0002602148,0.3529769,0.57515186,0.00014708178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9800735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9843837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23880714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23880714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2166199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8828758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12510238","doi":"10.29173/alr328","title":"Come on Mann Don’t Search Me! A Case Comment on R. v. C.J.F.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Supreme court; Law; Power (physics); Warrant; Political science; State (computer science); Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Search and seizure; Probable cause; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07560001743052239,"score_gpt":0.39294247898300194,"score_spread":0.3173424615524796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12510238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013930402,0.009595318,0.00060206885,0.7656383,0.005283319,0.00012087456,0.00076183875,0.00017806274,0.20388982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0819065,0.0029503524,0.0005251132,0.75608236,0.0010837022,0.00010673374,0.00015785,0.000045425346,0.15714197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963003,0.00040853053,0.00011967099,0.00050429185,0.0015496941,0.0011175406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962793,0.0019798256,0.00015086481,0.000082947285,0.0011513822,0.00035569715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023329696,0.0007173981,0.0005063979,0.00083268865,0.015465579,0.003646685,0.0023405165,0.02609353,0.009137688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010571915,0.0007997322,0.0010276542,0.0009828358,0.003194268,0.0020779725,0.0011138205,0.014633564,0.0021701893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042870997,0.00002289973,0.0012491954,0.00008131522,0.000015889249,0.0009548532,0.0018305709,0.0000962417,0.0003418649,0.034985036,0.9533798,0.00699941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040849583,0.000068491776,0.009764775,0.00030351404,0.000071504386,0.0007349392,0.0047476655,0.0002213771,0.0007225386,0.00443421,0.97873527,0.00015470036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73963493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.880157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26036507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011651573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020241275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5237968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13019373","doi":"","title":"Seeking Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada for Personal Injury Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Court of record; Law of the case; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02175163728687978,"score_gpt":0.3083399092966655,"score_spread":0.2865882720097857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13019373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22787052,0.0027819648,0.009060356,0.26864564,0.0021613268,0.00076196913,0.00028962927,0.00030778907,0.4881207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8550782,0.001188868,0.003368875,0.0748579,0.0007665064,0.00013430475,0.00013139693,0.00008872363,0.06438518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98138165,0.001500324,0.000474004,0.0013692045,0.005460695,0.009814026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815803,0.008376386,0.00073431816,0.00060232554,0.004944302,0.003762268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010990156,0.00046487083,0.0006617965,0.0021834332,0.033497576,0.013851704,0.0041526277,0.018156748,0.010053678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054152675,0.00082413416,0.00082452653,0.001996364,0.007817786,0.0038424633,0.007541332,0.01598936,0.0014521712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017626154,0.0003381947,0.019641152,0.0001622887,0.00008572346,0.015789319,0.045723323,0.0013338962,0.0043466473,0.5681657,0.28091404,0.06332352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020122403,0.00021857183,0.029611371,0.0009322531,0.00024996683,0.0024902471,0.09317657,0.005878346,0.0048456294,0.18074201,0.68102086,0.0006329057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7305937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9152709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96571237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03428763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103384264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54198575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133698474","doi":"","title":"S. Guillermard, M. Saint-Hilaire. \"1982-2001 Vingt ans de grands arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada, 45 décisions choisies, présentées et commentées\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016724723633538604,"score_gpt":0.2798264635686768,"score_spread":0.2631017399351382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133698474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008442851,0.14382492,0.0013627512,0.6702985,0.017148118,0.00020223563,0.0075238324,0.00028599135,0.15091081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12608613,0.07359476,0.0036751737,0.39593887,0.0058798175,0.00066277845,0.0016889474,0.0003626621,0.39211085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689865,0.00055636157,0.00022958366,0.00031897344,0.001407013,0.00058941304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775065,0.01062961,0.00072034093,0.00027716582,0.009976904,0.0008894971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036162948,0.0009803819,0.0008326283,0.0019840053,0.013121377,0.005017999,0.0027339542,0.015389066,0.018432347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017520914,0.0006898824,0.00076076307,0.0032717835,0.0021140904,0.0030427827,0.0017455318,0.010736419,0.006854884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000584708,0.000019008123,0.0012941343,0.00012209812,0.000011503771,0.00015124358,0.0014820459,0.00005763444,0.00014030791,0.01344529,0.97154737,0.011670853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000508736,0.000034973247,0.02486032,0.0010731104,0.00006885653,0.000102208716,0.0061921612,0.00014151448,0.00085111364,0.004991079,0.9615486,0.00008505712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76932025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9087025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23067975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010534583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028425569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46407652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134739315","doi":"","title":"H. Reid, J. Reid, C. Carrier. \"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Complément, jurisprudence et doctine\".","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Code (set theory); Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.03697541903515466,"score_gpt":0.288761886995865,"score_spread":0.25178646796071036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134739315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010713811,0.2522368,0.008729498,0.30551684,0.02017993,0.0006663427,0.016176408,0.00065867946,0.38512167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14241776,0.09660586,0.008593257,0.049269263,0.0028200347,0.0005026368,0.0037879322,0.00039397067,0.69560933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603087,0.0006398956,0.00021254671,0.00023963729,0.0023561793,0.0005208426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879534,0.001984094,0.0003850522,0.00021654663,0.009018532,0.00044247822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003344259,0.0006986221,0.00047172754,0.0035364192,0.009281631,0.003732479,0.0026312312,0.006821515,0.022352649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013696098,0.0006437454,0.0006587411,0.004170185,0.002196978,0.0021797556,0.0011199553,0.0036843927,0.0069648805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025144771,0.000015743797,0.0012438684,0.00015479955,0.00000783025,0.00010414767,0.0010573914,0.000082586455,0.000093812894,0.012734436,0.9549631,0.029517183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002634188,0.000025267691,0.02298108,0.00065029156,0.000057891957,0.00010023536,0.002552512,0.0001450623,0.0006105848,0.0043588514,0.96842504,0.00006684289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9378233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96557325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062176704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016341062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039385337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12508571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135945905","doi":"","title":"Hubert Reid, Claire Carrier. \"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et doctrine\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Philosophy; Code (set theory); Law; Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Theology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.020063749984128253,"score_gpt":0.28578172931701895,"score_spread":0.2657179793328907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135945905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004805344,0.3585014,0.0049417666,0.38436526,0.015183082,0.0003001154,0.0035629594,0.0003589035,0.2279812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12453173,0.1576018,0.0057500293,0.13012515,0.0034820952,0.00040396166,0.0012712559,0.00034192277,0.5764921],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958787,0.00064068136,0.00021184124,0.0003126404,0.002334284,0.0006219678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912957,0.0024987075,0.00031560863,0.00022699637,0.0053452803,0.0003177047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003521753,0.00085592427,0.0006420439,0.0034650976,0.0101237055,0.003789628,0.0027301838,0.011331951,0.015619099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698964,0.0007986508,0.0006081217,0.004519537,0.004520138,0.003375249,0.0013520077,0.007261592,0.004709143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020215408,0.000011568526,0.000498877,0.0001257575,0.000008507723,0.00014939586,0.0015010257,0.00007675696,0.000072891016,0.047579538,0.9288773,0.021078179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022857768,0.000012023334,0.0063759824,0.00061967573,0.000028769926,0.00008584094,0.0014877133,0.000095088966,0.00029908388,0.009722031,0.9811941,0.000056896537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91795564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9503353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08204436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021639502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03439173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16505504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142688777","doi":"10.21991/c9gw9p","title":"MEANING FROM CHAOS: REFLECTIONS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 — TWO YEARS AFTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10606902206255776,"score_gpt":0.3520335818041039,"score_spread":0.24596455974154613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142688777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03912917,0.004416082,0.00039525484,0.8922889,0.011242439,0.00003295988,0.00013744566,0.000014184417,0.052343577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60049057,0.007624273,0.00042763364,0.30932766,0.0109605575,0.00018401504,0.00021927732,0.00027534715,0.07049061],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869381,0.0068731597,0.00029179937,0.0008758662,0.0018277596,0.0031933167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849546,0.009145773,0.0009786038,0.00047786775,0.0012573099,0.0031857893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013937094,0.0006292076,0.00077723,0.00092188065,0.04178078,0.027539786,0.0031047433,0.020608712,0.006091629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033576194,0.0008334205,0.0008009692,0.0021074493,0.025438912,0.013773306,0.014221571,0.04921343,0.0013706936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022909838,0.0000855059,0.0017438522,0.0001440809,0.000015370328,0.002810122,0.5583825,0.00014102044,0.00028810135,0.14879033,0.279504,0.007865996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023733233,0.000039674753,0.0025375793,0.00037550429,0.000006292232,0.00022704851,0.2826643,0.000055562152,0.00015756706,0.014720299,0.6991384,0.000054018823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056598436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11595662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056598436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021149896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013696111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15345395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W144961966","doi":"","title":"Product Liability in Canada: Principles and Practice North of the Border","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"William Mitchell law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Liability; Product (mathematics); Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03810034289567787,"score_gpt":0.3242205281595999,"score_spread":0.286120185263922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W144961966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026843578,0.19926643,0.012522801,0.48199254,0.0034972853,0.00034886663,0.0014242249,0.00032688284,0.2737774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55875885,0.17580462,0.026855996,0.11753027,0.0020331428,0.0002561222,0.0007119521,0.00026761706,0.11778142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856413,0.0018951995,0.0008203151,0.0011645432,0.00852872,0.0019498338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960706,0.008082378,0.0013178367,0.0006142896,0.025474494,0.0038050555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011785599,0.0005069209,0.0009791207,0.008531277,0.012445767,0.018307772,0.0035486324,0.009465416,0.003878682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03640672,0.0009864061,0.00084141875,0.008440422,0.009992571,0.0036466385,0.0024051152,0.007384134,0.0004464243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054729,0.00007857869,0.0077546285,0.0007883626,0.00008099483,0.0004108474,0.003318252,0.00398928,0.00038864024,0.52915275,0.31797487,0.13600808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055261906,0.000045476587,0.02569945,0.0035924679,0.00014858277,0.00023048182,0.0037055756,0.0021360405,0.0004912197,0.06486162,0.89883476,0.00019912611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99575955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4206257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89386827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145459232","doi":"","title":"Notions juridiques applicables aux procédures de règlement amiable des litiges au Canada.","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.032002879601724765,"score_gpt":0.2932857415127895,"score_spread":0.26128286191106476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145459232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032345776,0.053433932,0.1599195,0.061041646,0.0016683722,0.0005086038,0.0015344823,0.00031531058,0.6892323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71991485,0.02170101,0.08251784,0.011985627,0.0019150246,0.0006786235,0.00056891073,0.00021137041,0.16050676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857269,0.00419635,0.00055961043,0.0012409458,0.0064744316,0.0018017896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99219996,0.0038859088,0.00046194805,0.0005106075,0.002611304,0.00033030173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00990307,0.0007583086,0.0008493982,0.0036549708,0.010739138,0.01143439,0.0032099553,0.0072247833,0.010690428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022996925,0.0007923813,0.0012187243,0.004111085,0.02652054,0.0056061274,0.002185328,0.012372464,0.0012894738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009013256,0.000004404918,0.00016603048,0.000039622413,0.000005617537,0.00004055472,0.0013036159,0.00023413649,0.000059537666,0.99095225,0.003151479,0.0040337523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043137275,0.000023884315,0.005249231,0.00047434948,0.000053430645,0.00031255666,0.003698757,0.0012744329,0.00048156286,0.6776372,0.31067428,0.00007719671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7254716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73496825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27452838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040529724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05673714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55229026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146111080","doi":"10.29173/alr149","title":"Seeking More Than Truth: A Rationalization of the Principled Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatoon Medical Imaging","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Deliberation; Law; Rationalization (economics); Supreme court; Epistemology; Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07719237449317133,"score_gpt":0.33975647246347374,"score_spread":0.2625640979703024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146111080","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034406547,0.0036507929,0.4500602,0.1030718,0.0015011141,0.0004748684,0.00018171253,0.0002850485,0.40636784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8594541,0.001321193,0.10678537,0.0115148295,0.0008642074,0.0003765529,0.00009298498,0.00020094641,0.019389758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9448537,0.025526222,0.003690947,0.0074837157,0.015146121,0.0032992614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653786,0.021134421,0.0020464708,0.0044920817,0.0062404014,0.0007079695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049310464,0.0007090038,0.0014460131,0.0032156634,0.006810408,0.01396934,0.0048441472,0.0135258045,0.003404749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061800383,0.000853767,0.0018865013,0.0015127396,0.0688525,0.012614041,0.006964297,0.01323465,0.0008879505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005732357,0.000003588288,0.00006058656,0.00001438865,0.000004586625,0.0000391808,0.0008375418,0.00021140237,0.000053648473,0.99686915,0.000556151,0.001344005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000177924,0.000006962396,0.00009047729,0.000046245532,0.000008534746,0.000034324737,0.0002581756,0.0011037448,0.00014512645,0.9907569,0.0075144134,0.000017297149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03442191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027728865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049310464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014078075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021888316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26078176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480030692","doi":"10.29173/alr148","title":"Auto Insurance as Social Contract: Solving Automobile Insurance Coverage Disputes Through a Public Regulatory Framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Statute; Insurance policy; Automobile insurance; Business; Actuarial science; Key person insurance; Insurance law; Accident (philosophy); Social insurance; Casualty insurance; Auto insurance risk selection; Product (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Property insurance; General insurance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05878912696404826,"score_gpt":0.3310163964461471,"score_spread":0.27222726948209885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480030692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07449714,0.0057959408,0.13660732,0.09797338,0.0004266484,0.0003623989,0.00025236793,0.000138797,0.68394595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96812785,0.0011532385,0.015441239,0.002828871,0.00023563685,0.00014182228,0.000044935554,0.00002356765,0.012002813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855003,0.0063299057,0.00031683742,0.00076731836,0.0044937767,0.0025919108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903464,0.0058492064,0.00074794726,0.0007941988,0.0018973962,0.000364911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013642898,0.0005593867,0.0007608366,0.0036444904,0.01040662,0.014019727,0.0036501952,0.008669701,0.0040247445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015160942,0.00047008332,0.001030142,0.0025822977,0.039290983,0.007477778,0.004430163,0.005826568,0.00024064264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016636596,0.000004431478,0.000105953965,0.00000673007,0.0000018915628,0.00003658432,0.00075224426,0.00049343385,0.000011838311,0.99690837,0.0005994884,0.0010774928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027567237,0.000011493839,0.00075133063,0.00015687483,0.000031223593,0.000083609055,0.004351662,0.008493706,0.00017241805,0.9415943,0.044296212,0.000029671042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44718808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49462882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5528119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04633661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07065074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8891703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480715691","doi":"","title":"L’Abus De Droit: L’Anténorme - Partie 1 (Abuse of Right: The Antenorm - Part I)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.024856803032552315,"score_gpt":0.2922822322337357,"score_spread":0.26742542920118334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480715691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030843155,0.0044234106,0.010096427,0.016015735,0.00032621023,0.00005852159,0.00013717018,0.00003200693,0.93806744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76895326,0.002133779,0.0023289325,0.009733753,0.00034910388,0.00013261178,0.000080231315,0.00008276779,0.21620557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463034,0.0019735738,0.00017248225,0.00086059317,0.0012111206,0.0011518523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803203,0.00092071766,0.00019054285,0.00030748404,0.00038981176,0.00015936157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485817,0.0004735211,0.00039965953,0.000963372,0.007334271,0.00778977,0.00096664886,0.004640363,0.011533487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004256426,0.0003875894,0.00069034967,0.00093848933,0.031635005,0.0061727725,0.004622457,0.006815654,0.0015117386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044980943,0.0000033975743,0.0001762736,0.0000147713035,0.0000018540542,0.000048830847,0.004066919,0.000033452467,0.00009058726,0.9920557,0.0018841639,0.0016195093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021409724,0.00005616357,0.0048173903,0.0005212516,0.000021414502,0.00042081226,0.009564818,0.00038603382,0.0007922815,0.4563529,0.526985,0.00006056588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06998528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075648904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06998528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008175226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056299767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1391558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481177748","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1253","title":"The Brilliant Career of Section 7 of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Criminal code; Mens rea; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06900587580948803,"score_gpt":0.3334691613772605,"score_spread":0.2644632855677725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481177748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0132367015,0.015513717,0.026195234,0.4927601,0.085276276,0.0002359719,0.0003032891,0.0004952038,0.3659836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17911759,0.011745459,0.020145642,0.41095367,0.039025694,0.00057710026,0.00045775526,0.0007537984,0.3372233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982053,0.004697576,0.00085924077,0.0016712301,0.009040996,0.0016780255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96540326,0.018652475,0.0019200916,0.0032514238,0.009403328,0.0013694273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015982466,0.00052459614,0.00039038443,0.0015611702,0.005194841,0.009148768,0.002265764,0.011349509,0.004231037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04333574,0.00055109465,0.0007519922,0.0012443662,0.017702753,0.0067032725,0.0029314752,0.020597605,0.002063567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025874338,0.000025693482,0.00031342742,0.000067645815,0.000004439662,0.000094193005,0.0013689267,0.00016982332,0.00023050289,0.79221714,0.18764031,0.01784204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014646122,0.00006501109,0.0014231278,0.0004315,0.0000095552405,0.0001263051,0.0007554558,0.00033063465,0.0005674795,0.051240392,0.94497806,0.0000578653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0398188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050782826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0398188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009548525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020938741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08452433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481710317","doi":"","title":"Should Canada Enact a New Sui Generis Database Right","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Political science; Right to be forgotten; History; Law; Computer science; Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.12427711234083327,"score_gpt":0.3202032427479464,"score_spread":0.19592613040711315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481710317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013894107,0.001107023,0.004759122,0.1858761,0.004336417,0.0004925268,0.004463771,0.0007443923,0.7843265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06843887,0.0008041778,0.00781952,0.15454699,0.00078750827,0.0002309651,0.0014138467,0.00020959793,0.76574844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98720026,0.0005542953,0.00059219403,0.0012375269,0.0076000625,0.002815654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98587614,0.0031103075,0.00039537463,0.0018926363,0.0069617038,0.0017638585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007993782,0.00039102507,0.0005586804,0.00124935,0.008180235,0.011303166,0.0025454003,0.02208856,0.026182998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023092395,0.0008580556,0.0010778768,0.0012708463,0.0038183737,0.0038604871,0.0034821401,0.00829685,0.0063226605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006829547,0.000081381644,0.003203896,0.000084819614,0.00003444608,0.00035749137,0.00096949574,0.0002125845,0.0013954489,0.51067996,0.46192944,0.020982703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056515364,0.00002867782,0.0029210176,0.0000864495,0.00003504571,0.00013745624,0.0004200737,0.0002669145,0.0010299444,0.0148382615,0.9801107,0.000068841306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7691971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8334526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2308029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017381992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09012211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46432424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483860873","doi":"","title":"International human rights and Canadian law: legal commitment, implementation and the charter.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Political science; Charter; Ex post facto law; Fundamental rights; International law; Linguistic rights; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sources of law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.052001202150730286,"score_gpt":0.32806683574568285,"score_spread":0.27606563359495256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483860873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090692815,0.06791261,0.0013890947,0.038016688,0.0046087136,0.00007050947,0.00024988438,0.000083669016,0.886762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041365422,0.052825686,0.0029769125,0.015858814,0.0011313357,0.0001126486,0.00038383546,0.00014886656,0.88519657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963007,0.00028089795,0.000052299256,0.00022506903,0.0026233431,0.0005176625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987915,0.0002674184,0.000052445357,0.000059983882,0.0006827066,0.00014598573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016192379,0.0008143139,0.00042330957,0.0025690957,0.009393349,0.010861893,0.0019002741,0.0038671147,0.012127383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004421471,0.0005181644,0.0002907665,0.0047593787,0.016185876,0.0048975446,0.0022501606,0.0054349536,0.0021407513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028106772,0.000004869619,0.00006209492,0.00006535859,0.0000010122415,0.000034207376,0.0036161111,0.000060649778,0.00003417356,0.61963487,0.3446714,0.0318125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014947312,0.0000013924364,0.00030329844,0.00018759399,0.0000014446152,0.000024380139,0.0010915105,0.000049494734,0.000024434446,0.017124504,0.98118275,0.000007732361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9044994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95455235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93262136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06737864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1158677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48886853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484087257","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1110","title":"Twenty-Five Years in Search of a Reasonable Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Scope (computer science); Code (set theory); Criminal code; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Section (typography); Law and economics; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.08967049957305391,"score_gpt":0.35082779431135724,"score_spread":0.26115729473830335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484087257","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018351734,0.21875514,0.02059483,0.58086264,0.015949788,0.00018556074,0.0002679641,0.0001276613,0.14490464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44277394,0.13018546,0.032968685,0.25924125,0.0098825395,0.000681555,0.00042963045,0.00026907388,0.12356795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874746,0.0062906663,0.0009921768,0.0016953672,0.00257329,0.00097384973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98506457,0.0072626094,0.0009827088,0.001334805,0.003551193,0.0018040527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028865935,0.0007079165,0.0008779797,0.0021643497,0.0063381046,0.0097148735,0.0016398857,0.0057328306,0.008179979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032690138,0.0004509995,0.000691974,0.0015990166,0.023812838,0.0092156725,0.009239471,0.012384064,0.0024685876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007044168,0.00005632422,0.0005060037,0.00023543568,0.000028544679,0.00020216293,0.004291689,0.00033078287,0.00017037403,0.9151572,0.03893224,0.040018868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001946816,0.000076471835,0.00044875866,0.0007480513,0.000010851061,0.0001561977,0.0028560343,0.0001785105,0.00019912934,0.18731073,0.80796176,0.000033997174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006651401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009328494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028865935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010482066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011142926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15265948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485137107","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1220","title":"Tort Lite?: Vancouver (City) v. War and the Availability of Damages for Charter Infringements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Damages; Law; Tort; Charter; Political science; Plaintiff; Liability","score_opus":0.08835699322221514,"score_gpt":0.33187557867192813,"score_spread":0.243518585449713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485137107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28657278,0.023928897,0.00071447383,0.08980251,0.00079621165,0.000098237004,0.0016704026,0.000040490166,0.59637606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91902477,0.006553307,0.00022348372,0.016201032,0.00018083477,0.000023065955,0.0003114895,0.000013667586,0.0574683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.00018735642,0.000043595188,0.000115150855,0.0006270015,0.0005764983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980812,0.0007828662,0.00018244737,0.000057686546,0.00063451694,0.00026137318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010361283,0.0003188216,0.00032640997,0.0022505342,0.006927394,0.0053449613,0.0014560665,0.004412134,0.006587831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005767884,0.0003603909,0.00027529564,0.003224162,0.003293947,0.0012303208,0.0011210409,0.003956093,0.00057513604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030381852,0.00014383467,0.043162834,0.00070986943,0.00016979995,0.0070849136,0.019558376,0.0010833396,0.0014545585,0.5231512,0.31772134,0.085456125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002066845,0.00017760806,0.2275106,0.0013571588,0.0003987772,0.0024105955,0.043968443,0.0013265043,0.0033414112,0.08189231,0.6370902,0.00031975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9108522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97003496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089147806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020803504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015381228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17934561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489276393","doi":"","title":"Restraint and Proliferation in Criminal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Mandate; Constitution; Politics; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01680214579787631,"score_gpt":0.313583114705148,"score_spread":0.2967809689072717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489276393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21626353,0.006166674,0.009746429,0.011445968,0.00019517477,0.000056360466,0.00011772145,0.000074687996,0.75593346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117423,0.0014874897,0.001207849,0.00067999115,0.00016950919,0.000048458,0.000043382744,0.000023461245,0.015165717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926158,0.002343944,0.00035898373,0.0013098349,0.002433435,0.00093798403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98735017,0.0063150097,0.00235248,0.0018813183,0.0015052799,0.0005957493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040749107,0.00032288808,0.00060746016,0.004217514,0.009352501,0.009925167,0.0017719723,0.004020305,0.009481413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015177469,0.00054952945,0.00037059304,0.00510098,0.0495047,0.008455008,0.008217268,0.0035559912,0.0014220482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016239823,0.000024941572,0.0027353491,0.000037426667,0.000004336296,0.00017793018,0.005415893,0.00031645157,0.0002827759,0.9781156,0.0010173979,0.011855645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040640207,0.000054700373,0.01059022,0.00035239765,0.000017974695,0.00061558344,0.011350692,0.001279042,0.0006893826,0.84140337,0.13355447,0.000051581013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025790969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02485244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025790969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074267555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00488202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053885102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491919779","doi":"10.21991/c96m35","title":"Administrative Law, Judicial Deference, and the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.03788362426289593,"score_gpt":0.31262739621202357,"score_spread":0.27474377194912764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491919779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025137817,0.020924866,0.023359137,0.18949942,0.0024391098,0.00007864844,0.00016718771,0.00017056636,0.73822325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88904166,0.0062309084,0.0073639033,0.018908277,0.00244855,0.00010042333,0.00008565801,0.00008522768,0.07573544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838906,0.0042958725,0.00044245098,0.0014742314,0.007019016,0.0028778717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98431015,0.0072724037,0.0013380738,0.0013932062,0.0044275476,0.0012586701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014442564,0.0003546745,0.00049822446,0.0028559067,0.012905102,0.018852644,0.0025949713,0.005752095,0.004607184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026746612,0.00039284254,0.00049793726,0.0024655848,0.05580254,0.006198457,0.0033284917,0.009852921,0.0005948322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024627539,0.000002734949,0.00006211676,0.0000052189084,5.2588246e-7,0.00001835203,0.00042174943,0.00005424242,0.000015050114,0.9940128,0.0031499767,0.0022548102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001948598,0.000016630405,0.0009796438,0.0001573389,0.0000062224112,0.0000511273,0.0009806571,0.0004849686,0.00014907733,0.8068224,0.19029453,0.00003779531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31006223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2817479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027912486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043234717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492717687","doi":"","title":"Ancillary Issues with Oakes: The Development of the Waterfield Test and the Problem of Fundamental Constitutional Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Balancing test; Separation of powers; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; History","score_opus":0.010293016586053222,"score_gpt":0.25095058875903986,"score_spread":0.24065757217298664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492717687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027254755,0.0105362795,0.14661148,0.16217151,0.0020257747,0.00024027537,0.00023784439,0.00012259549,0.6507994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88082093,0.0055716224,0.0385086,0.02738402,0.0014563005,0.00022824538,0.00009738664,0.00012356156,0.04580936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833438,0.005210025,0.00046456308,0.0020192985,0.0073198653,0.0016423998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799626,0.014262061,0.0008165668,0.00098049,0.0034324103,0.0005458233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020281894,0.00072972546,0.0011066787,0.0043382132,0.009824974,0.008812912,0.0039814417,0.006827689,0.0053485427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041550107,0.00058424356,0.0010455163,0.0031016367,0.076755404,0.017718637,0.0053081126,0.013414958,0.00039376927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7791653e-7,7.866261e-7,0.000031695214,0.0000033671924,6.100179e-7,0.000014976544,0.0001415375,0.000058556245,0.000005228282,0.9978382,0.0004314195,0.0014726339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007139595,0.000007505408,0.00022224209,0.00008426852,0.000005144218,0.000041991672,0.00033244136,0.00057180715,0.00013483007,0.96184105,0.036727637,0.000024040013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3745885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30333665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3745885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027114058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036281537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7448163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493063613","doi":"10.3968/4433","title":"The Roles of Local Rules of Criminal Procedure in the Process of Rule by Law in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal procedure; Law; China; Local government; Process (computing); Unitary state; Rule of law; Criminal justice; Political science; Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.011871828096083703,"score_gpt":0.2953846283039714,"score_spread":0.28351280020788766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493063613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526034,0.0030413351,0.0072459276,0.008969992,0.00013555313,0.00030379783,0.00014545197,0.0000886447,0.12746598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993378,0.00054087903,0.0009312122,0.00019684022,0.000020807242,0.000029527682,0.00002655218,0.0000097869115,0.004866317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942661,0.0015351272,0.00048873003,0.00087675697,0.001439479,0.001393857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924251,0.0021403919,0.0016575913,0.0006081926,0.0017468045,0.0014219022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006304914,0.00020866988,0.0003980588,0.0027707694,0.005936267,0.006869319,0.0011000355,0.000863737,0.003642161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008710824,0.00037631992,0.0003688199,0.0028690365,0.009141056,0.0029766425,0.0029919213,0.0014015984,0.00019722036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000794389,0.00012331389,0.18798834,0.00041869798,0.00010014131,0.001792411,0.040741466,0.0034400832,0.0012569551,0.64847654,0.0061516725,0.109431006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005877917,0.00019704287,0.71025884,0.00080379803,0.00020925795,0.0004976053,0.027499123,0.013857062,0.0016279604,0.12030789,0.124417156,0.00026546846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10552862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16605848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10552862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014638371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022101708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20982873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493358019","doi":"","title":"Patrick Brode — Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01702309638900065,"score_gpt":0.26846114672662685,"score_spread":0.25143805033762623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493358019","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29201022,0.021624137,0.0010368678,0.5043736,0.0029804762,0.00014195668,0.00088003237,0.000057993933,0.17689475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555721,0.010657066,0.0007854221,0.04726434,0.00040037162,0.000056084737,0.0001497601,0.000063095904,0.085051715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334913,0.0008762767,0.00021893803,0.0006417079,0.0021935257,0.0027203294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889482,0.0027245786,0.00065400486,0.00022038621,0.0051731383,0.002279636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004270602,0.0006179223,0.00061653124,0.004153815,0.054184675,0.009054083,0.0037271972,0.010420624,0.008195743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027960336,0.0008245458,0.00051056396,0.0060171187,0.017842077,0.0053704204,0.004847781,0.01286795,0.0004032608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013401479,0.00009709429,0.044339012,0.0003092079,0.00008334256,0.003812836,0.24665278,0.0005361798,0.00047266285,0.18649943,0.4355507,0.08151277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023710892,0.000041870673,0.09267819,0.0009180425,0.00009477404,0.0015068759,0.3806301,0.0004104914,0.0006023897,0.014376071,0.50841844,0.00029903225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99699956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99889404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11808403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11808403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21357621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495252859","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2230369","title":"The Governance of Privacy Through Codes of Conduct: International Lessons for U.S. Privacy Policy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Business; Privacy by Design; Corporate governance; Information privacy law; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06827569980196792,"score_gpt":0.404770199794318,"score_spread":0.3364944999923501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495252859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038061168,0.015074298,0.009190626,0.63337636,0.0013972862,0.000058104797,0.00035326014,0.00006925702,0.30241966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9022165,0.012132922,0.0057178577,0.06371461,0.0014026786,0.00015687209,0.00024768148,0.00011471067,0.014296132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98569655,0.0066784853,0.000521596,0.0014876022,0.0031792447,0.0024365946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605395,0.021955052,0.002391373,0.0046989718,0.007995496,0.002419626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0198219,0.00043207203,0.0005407613,0.0024565295,0.00609914,0.015894365,0.0014043727,0.00833976,0.0072538755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041315082,0.00032465832,0.0007821714,0.0042674323,0.02311905,0.013611755,0.005968247,0.01157008,0.00070905423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025945394,0.000026433061,0.0012117234,0.00003713303,0.0000092096625,0.00003164993,0.0020816717,0.0002901356,0.000062075334,0.9613298,0.017035086,0.017859057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052383584,0.000059007652,0.0058537456,0.001454166,0.00004453622,0.00012722275,0.008664523,0.00090291695,0.0005270989,0.7234295,0.2588313,0.00005367464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060254194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045493167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060254194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013214288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027239561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119806945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495532371","doi":"10.5040/9781472561091","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07231684435059137,"score_gpt":0.30147326334268726,"score_spread":0.22915641899209588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495532371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017935969,0.037627783,0.023263527,0.31970784,0.0037277385,0.00006690542,0.00018430436,0.000103556384,0.59738237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78894407,0.03470746,0.012708163,0.06834003,0.004090529,0.00020257686,0.00020724423,0.00028054696,0.090519406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864074,0.0058791013,0.0003108707,0.0016893079,0.004027809,0.0016855109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867259,0.0094395345,0.0003869749,0.00065455335,0.0022492798,0.0005437791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012158316,0.0007953717,0.0010312147,0.0076113176,0.015990596,0.014931437,0.0038701885,0.008675974,0.006596474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013672241,0.0005137065,0.0009789296,0.0048991484,0.09526319,0.015605748,0.0063306373,0.0144675905,0.0010362581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.603639e-7,0.0000030987715,0.00006942693,0.000015650876,0.0000012342754,0.000021617516,0.0017620061,0.00009107558,0.000006580953,0.99222904,0.003967116,0.0018321581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048522525,0.000005274741,0.00027457118,0.00022618394,0.0000041635526,0.000041333842,0.0028208278,0.00060075015,0.000037764217,0.84134054,0.15463097,0.000012626167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2323472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21606965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2323472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042825185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027255576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46198958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496033635","doi":"","title":"More than Words: Enhancing the Proposed Canadian Victims Bill of Rights (Bill C-32)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Business; Human rights","score_opus":0.01619554934653395,"score_gpt":0.2715232000048499,"score_spread":0.255327650658316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496033635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008191549,0.0073317518,0.0042693173,0.5408189,0.020184226,0.0015728304,0.0035818322,0.0006462712,0.41340342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06653233,0.006006317,0.014132602,0.51901567,0.0036020535,0.00089570024,0.001991721,0.0002513447,0.38757226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746422,0.0017327605,0.0010046338,0.0014538933,0.01524032,0.0059261564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97589105,0.0036243482,0.00065268663,0.0010100461,0.015856393,0.0029655893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013629141,0.0010694009,0.00095256156,0.0027013342,0.012661688,0.009520107,0.0066003185,0.018959371,0.021257846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036709838,0.0010845285,0.0018408019,0.0020904366,0.0069005536,0.0032248467,0.0036955855,0.010594838,0.0043940824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025374362,0.000028647299,0.0009515641,0.00012810355,0.000009893682,0.0002301106,0.0010141633,0.00020660409,0.00037650258,0.15081015,0.83321476,0.0130041875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144025,0.000027654914,0.003668917,0.00031731944,0.00003097366,0.00009975362,0.0007868665,0.00018946943,0.00028648644,0.0047374135,0.9897216,0.00010211707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95840454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9734493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071714155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071714155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.261593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52032506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497276413","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1171","title":"Sniffing Out the Ancillary Powers Implications of the Dog Sniff Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Search and seizure; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0795397052487384,"score_gpt":0.3767873164550151,"score_spread":0.29724761120627674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497276413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2216813,0.022535522,0.009300815,0.37859917,0.0029912891,0.0001506659,0.00023461929,0.000045306933,0.36446136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91540366,0.008229013,0.0023102683,0.052737575,0.0010645742,0.000034013552,0.000049502407,0.000028525203,0.02014281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99002683,0.0020433834,0.00029570606,0.0006680758,0.0054093143,0.0015566226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792671,0.01409741,0.001421396,0.00036027707,0.004183153,0.0006706092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014438247,0.00034509983,0.0005767533,0.0025809263,0.008628892,0.0075233597,0.0031945396,0.0062405937,0.0019574622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035575796,0.0003778111,0.0005187948,0.0018673278,0.018356882,0.0055220956,0.0029717034,0.008856814,0.00023642168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049866507,0.000031108673,0.0027777136,0.00014276948,0.000030202127,0.0013936631,0.0070938095,0.0006294643,0.0004812445,0.9452936,0.024265131,0.017811518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014036967,0.00015064982,0.020410633,0.0015656862,0.00024941747,0.0007533922,0.03162197,0.003436061,0.0035576718,0.45780227,0.48005518,0.000256695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40451187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7273789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40451187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020238312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030580226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80431473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497282126","doi":"","title":"When Rights Become Empty Promises: Promoting an Exclusionary Rule that Vindicates Personal Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Rule of law; Appeal; Search and seizure; Status quo; Convict; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03988807206243631,"score_gpt":0.2954435197896745,"score_spread":0.25555544772723815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497282126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12931159,0.0024204643,0.07810879,0.11072864,0.0016848114,0.00018158849,0.000047296515,0.00039096843,0.6771259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90225583,0.001371469,0.018855426,0.026333513,0.00082383666,0.00015859985,0.000055359884,0.00025812184,0.049887724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98155266,0.007324679,0.00075046346,0.0021857535,0.004790626,0.0033957507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697927,0.018438341,0.00240069,0.0032264804,0.0036477123,0.002494025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019422598,0.00040128033,0.00044712765,0.0013523014,0.011778808,0.01488305,0.0029325404,0.008597707,0.012270519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0466789,0.00057355483,0.00083771115,0.00073076796,0.017003303,0.021507766,0.016405571,0.012776684,0.0026002047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031327345,0.00010387561,0.0015182592,0.00004347534,0.00000774523,0.00051618053,0.015452284,0.0003547053,0.0008544945,0.9347635,0.014222047,0.032132033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058965878,0.00014468005,0.0019078209,0.0006396759,0.000045923287,0.0006425029,0.014288936,0.002325098,0.0034772637,0.5515359,0.42482057,0.00011261484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008276501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018897805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019422598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046090973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012750601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10271776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499267772","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1200","title":"Charter Detention and the Exclusion of Evidence after Grant, Harrison and Suberu","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Section (typography); Misconduct; Right to counsel; Political science; Habeas corpus; Meaning (existential); Reasonable suspicion; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07520492235012231,"score_gpt":0.3524689362978585,"score_spread":0.2772640139477362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499267772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10147372,0.09968784,0.026564397,0.396759,0.011609457,0.0006727066,0.0005720517,0.00020621177,0.3624546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436393,0.020249682,0.009714181,0.12835522,0.0027876247,0.00030645772,0.00015145764,0.00006111877,0.09473495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755672,0.0058878595,0.0012904353,0.0025640265,0.011956415,0.0027340201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754964,0.016595159,0.0011780086,0.0010019535,0.00504608,0.00068238145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017316721,0.00051315513,0.0007652817,0.0022747654,0.00687183,0.0077110287,0.0021934072,0.0144003,0.0013926141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04889046,0.0005777056,0.0010857577,0.0017109466,0.020324547,0.0051149763,0.004908845,0.016082972,0.00034789427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037786307,0.000030176421,0.0008589583,0.00009707811,0.000021574384,0.00044306958,0.00348261,0.00026674505,0.0004590325,0.93689317,0.030548783,0.026861046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013100595,0.00022780114,0.005960671,0.001306052,0.00016341469,0.0006476059,0.0033177934,0.0007209651,0.0028771,0.32153308,0.6628545,0.0002599755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118607506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20018308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118607506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012690703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030853339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2358343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500562463","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1161","title":"R. v. Ferguson and the Search for a Coherent Approach to Mandatory Minimum Sentences under Section 12","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Charter; Law; Sentence; Context (archaeology); Punishment (psychology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13052636827675382,"score_gpt":0.3564753529031405,"score_spread":0.22594898462638666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500562463","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045117795,0.017101064,0.024492702,0.5186248,0.004215758,0.00046720603,0.00036941367,0.0006012607,0.38900995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5272421,0.0037012747,0.02100443,0.37702098,0.0026095668,0.0006310643,0.00014224312,0.000112699796,0.0675356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765778,0.005366674,0.0015609327,0.0033371286,0.0077096145,0.0054479023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883073,0.006954067,0.0012239133,0.0005858176,0.002163908,0.00076499407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018455345,0.0010147372,0.0012991248,0.0027145196,0.009616112,0.007924903,0.0041931486,0.04299046,0.00229049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029412933,0.001617188,0.002181432,0.0010777797,0.015871191,0.0048770583,0.0035076197,0.023763932,0.00068366295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034051496,0.0000331794,0.0003841749,0.000042572447,0.000011623806,0.00041564592,0.00082561205,0.00039330916,0.000451398,0.9519164,0.03924764,0.006244433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036328676,0.00042586253,0.00540085,0.0011973312,0.00015667459,0.0010821366,0.0010789041,0.0027534654,0.0022564358,0.7511139,0.23370063,0.00047048682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16171965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22780806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8382803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012171512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03057019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3215567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503059967","doi":"10.29173/alr1328","title":"A Failed Experiment - Investigative Detention: Ten Years Later","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Parliament; Remand (court procedure); Immigration detention; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.05482765130025396,"score_gpt":0.34210789971130967,"score_spread":0.2872802484110557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503059967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1549212,0.02122358,0.030154603,0.3641977,0.0061038993,0.0017418074,0.0008286756,0.00025216275,0.42057648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815055,0.004977617,0.009525773,0.084336706,0.00095225347,0.0017964739,0.00016924735,0.00015152885,0.083035365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9488354,0.031160682,0.0010847059,0.0042482824,0.012057882,0.002613092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9234821,0.060070246,0.0019100998,0.005422578,0.007123404,0.0019914764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049809847,0.0005322532,0.0010877951,0.00089245784,0.010297141,0.0100386925,0.0032923957,0.010288646,0.0053417613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071421504,0.0005152743,0.00090275455,0.0013084606,0.038348235,0.006532856,0.00451641,0.014132921,0.00078389246],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044359727,0.00034325875,0.0026441547,0.00039744048,0.00006424355,0.00042065125,0.015790958,0.00069440034,0.0013023056,0.91833013,0.027396064,0.032172773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008741088,0.0014612633,0.011654184,0.0016340037,0.0003043548,0.00031554524,0.016868934,0.00235148,0.007516864,0.23530151,0.7214674,0.0002503282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2659641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23529853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038028866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031988256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.528832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504962747","doi":"10.37974/alf.144","title":"Four Decades of Cannabis Criminals in Canada: 1970-2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amsterdam Law Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Section (typography); Library science; Political science; Law; Media studies; Spring (device); Sociology; History; Engineering; Advertising","score_opus":0.03111809042252403,"score_gpt":0.296881531112344,"score_spread":0.26576344068981994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504962747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86659664,0.029055413,0.0003340691,0.022993196,0.00046791832,0.00012820677,0.035156775,0.00007710727,0.04519072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9418954,0.014264656,0.0002149815,0.001783719,0.00012299494,0.000038718834,0.008311075,0.000050329545,0.033318255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847215,0.00006528161,0.00006726311,0.00012730353,0.0006137868,0.00065421005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956232,0.00020530437,0.00082865666,0.0000818031,0.0020976823,0.0011633947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081912184,0.00033511524,0.000617541,0.0044566337,0.008106178,0.0036126166,0.0018035957,0.0014593105,0.0074746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039370246,0.0005693224,0.0004448288,0.010350749,0.0018818831,0.0018653575,0.0030187916,0.002993784,0.00080465234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038718284,0.00021807164,0.71778256,0.0008727867,0.00022123956,0.0018759997,0.05690188,0.00045531115,0.00037475242,0.008792986,0.097656935,0.11446029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066713146,0.000024222129,0.8782223,0.0004626134,0.00006487521,0.00034705052,0.039673712,0.0002242208,0.00021348339,0.00035213577,0.08034556,0.000063096064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99654514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99914527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06453988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06453988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08054846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4682718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505333001","doi":"10.7202/043731ar","title":"JEAN CAROL BOUCHER, L'appel à la Cour du Québec d'une décision du Tribunal administratif du Québec, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2002, 191 p., ISBN 2-89451-558-8.","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015021711467490973,"score_gpt":0.24474355928380506,"score_spread":0.22972184781631408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505333001","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067504036,0.7512946,0.0014367191,0.1505076,0.015555887,0.00009761949,0.0014451428,0.00022353254,0.078763835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01531229,0.35516116,0.0020012497,0.041329674,0.0050037615,0.00012182969,0.001265219,0.00043971327,0.5793651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662894,0.0004642998,0.00015004893,0.0004206804,0.0019797669,0.00035620565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996682,0.0007036149,0.00022551103,0.0000772992,0.0019392677,0.000372287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027803327,0.001828351,0.0011764998,0.003351583,0.006714786,0.0056229606,0.0027995664,0.006294031,0.054320917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049975994,0.00089930464,0.00064673467,0.006450049,0.0030147873,0.0052699232,0.0016010962,0.0049260994,0.02025645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013200463,0.000005536281,0.00016947831,0.00024010437,0.0000069608936,0.00004366841,0.00049573457,0.000035610607,0.00006529891,0.0023867257,0.9760617,0.020475976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006415748,0.0000037293323,0.001277411,0.00033651333,0.000006115006,0.000080894664,0.0007459334,0.000029162878,0.0000728244,0.0007574948,0.99666363,0.000019875506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88022715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9380773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11977285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025165642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028109798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24095637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506611381","doi":"","title":"Section 38 and the open courts principle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Legislation; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Government (linguistics); Open government; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Transparency (behavior); Computer science","score_opus":0.020339244722176405,"score_gpt":0.34231363642640833,"score_spread":0.3219743917042319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506611381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01261528,0.002939727,0.03348074,0.081640296,0.0016655243,0.0002271084,0.00027306547,0.00008629406,0.86707205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59412235,0.0035589573,0.02562082,0.16017392,0.005309596,0.0013539805,0.00035747897,0.00021382628,0.20928918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722201,0.006165278,0.0011906022,0.0038909407,0.012380504,0.0041524624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856639,0.007935484,0.0006764642,0.0016498223,0.0030928238,0.0009814751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016437896,0.0005252655,0.00076580036,0.0015303844,0.008205141,0.008639345,0.0023239253,0.015467373,0.012904803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02851439,0.0007608635,0.0012629974,0.001113402,0.023847552,0.010830294,0.007774343,0.015066703,0.00308729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042493043,0.0000044131025,0.000050538143,0.000007882301,0.0000018722714,0.000031093306,0.00024626954,0.00004919542,0.00004123938,0.9940176,0.0036260819,0.0019196667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038599213,0.000018761984,0.00028872103,0.00010736115,0.000008376997,0.000095204006,0.00018451503,0.00013504107,0.00015981181,0.87091774,0.1280227,0.000023181043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050998896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034674596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050998896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008489348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020765558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10140407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511740437","doi":"","title":"Unchecked Power: The Constitutional Regulation of Arrest Reconsidered","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Habeas corpus; Mandate; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.05803025011553795,"score_gpt":0.32200586881567245,"score_spread":0.2639756187001345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511740437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06254182,0.005682695,0.06512242,0.118656434,0.001750522,0.0003534213,0.00038486018,0.00040342196,0.74510443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384803,0.0015211035,0.007600856,0.01466469,0.00070303027,0.00031633512,0.00009186946,0.00015369063,0.036468178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707266,0.007037994,0.0015157848,0.005152442,0.008940428,0.006626677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818585,0.008619678,0.00076255755,0.0028104838,0.004708232,0.0012405894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024106206,0.00068090274,0.0012489806,0.002161243,0.013405476,0.018758485,0.0060708118,0.0101762405,0.0041550226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030251775,0.0009945025,0.0011856051,0.0018844006,0.07663435,0.008975566,0.0072514513,0.01547579,0.0005958195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008711924,0.000005796866,0.0001461115,0.0000130640865,0.0000053030008,0.000036357684,0.0016878638,0.0002876142,0.00015266148,0.9932728,0.001465906,0.0029177929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081120226,0.00005941645,0.001378337,0.0003623293,0.000107814834,0.00007352564,0.0037776597,0.0015964444,0.0010998214,0.86683905,0.12447954,0.0001447819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4678317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5032738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4678317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04368098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064986214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93021727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514322907","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1388602","title":"The Gap in Canadian Police Powers: Canada Needs 'Public Order Policing' Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Public order; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.017076246756477967,"score_gpt":0.2878400949397348,"score_spread":0.27076384818325683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514322907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037196018,0.007909593,0.0008973227,0.86412096,0.0020861418,0.00014563756,0.0015672146,0.00015804029,0.08591903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54607505,0.012345623,0.007229297,0.36506823,0.0017189403,0.0002821212,0.0014507212,0.00028328592,0.065546684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795346,0.0015224541,0.0006822316,0.0011540283,0.0072949673,0.009811665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92898095,0.012441586,0.0020618606,0.0014956216,0.038496263,0.016523737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015248412,0.00062513276,0.0016508091,0.0049314667,0.026205525,0.02150742,0.0073894,0.018949103,0.026736705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05365125,0.00093404326,0.0018449796,0.0068779094,0.008314693,0.008690577,0.006497725,0.012156248,0.0014764639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018503526,0.0001819384,0.017705187,0.0009756994,0.00011861708,0.0005682608,0.010577959,0.0016543973,0.0005099281,0.23822562,0.63385105,0.09544629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002162416,0.00009462712,0.060581665,0.002953444,0.00028443354,0.00016118844,0.030823115,0.00175349,0.0005404857,0.037875347,0.8643469,0.0003689341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99543494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18557136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18557136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.61351347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515441809","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1008","title":"A Kindler, Gentler Supreme Court?: The Case of Burns and the Need For a Principled Approach To Overruling","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09241839410031798,"score_gpt":0.35808402014848256,"score_spread":0.26566562604816457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515441809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026458763,0.009718354,0.02048607,0.7521044,0.0017523433,0.000075161086,0.000050522594,0.00007908248,0.18927528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66760075,0.003707128,0.013986103,0.27752903,0.0019547679,0.00019659934,0.00003205016,0.000110826484,0.03488278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98346925,0.0075511336,0.0004112965,0.00228934,0.004029044,0.0022500316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886079,0.007437564,0.0004618053,0.0011492602,0.0015251514,0.00081825256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021978745,0.00034055384,0.0008274813,0.0016218425,0.014894464,0.011411097,0.0032022456,0.01876297,0.0036214446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041336223,0.0008104974,0.0008534884,0.0012341335,0.038314067,0.013246012,0.0059406217,0.024689265,0.00071336795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068424315,0.00000757235,0.00017216502,0.000018993762,0.000005165559,0.000118461765,0.0014494439,0.0001014076,0.000056402117,0.9794143,0.01425449,0.0043947385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033896064,0.000017884811,0.00034384552,0.00021277796,0.000013793528,0.00025559956,0.0023954639,0.0004963483,0.0002545349,0.9004073,0.09553182,0.000036609443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035240274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07291564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035240274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007376963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0147502525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11623615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515931003","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Lawyers' Guide to Extraordinary Remedies [Book Review]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pagination; Publishing; Law; Index (typography); Project commissioning; Criminal law; Political science; Management; Art; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0513728380658188,"score_gpt":0.41695961395766357,"score_spread":0.36558677589184474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515931003","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018371786,0.85220706,0.0035233048,0.04256646,0.018579474,0.00040398026,0.0014160371,0.00080456235,0.080315374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016284037,0.6906469,0.010006029,0.038286455,0.0094479835,0.0006482456,0.0020351612,0.00029886217,0.24700195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981652,0.00031602557,0.00017730777,0.00013827652,0.0011100817,0.00009318323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567974,0.0017071757,0.0004236336,0.00012813341,0.0018015858,0.00025979118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017183439,0.0013628445,0.0019873912,0.00628958,0.0012604791,0.003133039,0.0020006963,0.00277755,0.05493572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008524995,0.001306376,0.001002523,0.0066013723,0.0011235436,0.0032388328,0.0014160817,0.004867281,0.043820757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041616127,0.000010459768,0.000015269188,0.00047722043,0.0000050665394,0.000022766653,0.000026866815,0.000029860661,0.000031435004,0.0007023577,0.91299856,0.08567597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006329961,0.000008168939,0.00017328288,0.00088637986,0.0000061514374,0.00015685798,0.000017800621,0.00002201503,0.000014314337,0.00096037047,0.99774075,0.0000075202697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011883368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035557166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05493572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017400979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00784199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18377829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516723310","doi":"","title":"Mistake of Law and Obstruction of Justice: A 'Bad Excuse' ... Even for a Lawyer!","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Law; Mistake; Duty; Criminal law; Mens rea; Economic Justice; Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Political science; Common law; Criminal justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030068005038148674,"score_gpt":0.3312826895287471,"score_spread":0.30121468449059846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516723310","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020159561,0.011875659,0.0028086503,0.86282283,0.0071481825,0.000023659994,0.000040892344,0.000106435094,0.095014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37170032,0.0043901373,0.001821679,0.5358652,0.0027150572,0.000055658,0.00004994488,0.00016379262,0.08323821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98864913,0.0043114573,0.00050132186,0.00089430436,0.003859309,0.0017843461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938041,0.0027838517,0.00071582344,0.00049236504,0.0011524188,0.0010514631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051590237,0.000591518,0.00064850703,0.00084363617,0.0128313815,0.00865633,0.0018204377,0.019524125,0.0044602547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027677294,0.0004925989,0.00039957935,0.00054646656,0.037669078,0.010314748,0.0072529754,0.019469634,0.0017409248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005884748,0.00006368758,0.0024983718,0.00013009734,0.000020559904,0.0032768615,0.04914322,0.00006016343,0.00048018256,0.3739554,0.5269926,0.04332005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038475508,0.00010814264,0.00356605,0.0009198223,0.000034940123,0.0046621836,0.052320454,0.0002514955,0.00079905824,0.1168781,0.82030153,0.00011979948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03089258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07671153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03089258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044491696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009301915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061425507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516769900","doi":"10.4324/9780203072578.ch21","title":"Rights in the criminal process: a case study of convergence and disclosure rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Process (computing); Political science; Business; Criminology; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.10183539024514793,"score_gpt":0.37305202186754033,"score_spread":0.2712166316223924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516769900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25915533,0.0077291643,0.016568013,0.017246403,0.0003084099,0.00019248515,0.000034770874,0.000045397934,0.6987199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94919646,0.0028641045,0.0051191826,0.0015105903,0.00010804286,0.0001919405,0.000024483337,0.0000396751,0.040945414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98922616,0.007660307,0.00022333536,0.00051262963,0.0014634411,0.0009141366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488705,0.0041591087,0.00021803459,0.00031758868,0.00024644172,0.00017182546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01020285,0.00045591372,0.0006136748,0.0024121143,0.01650008,0.008443962,0.0018045986,0.005438385,0.0040566875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011516376,0.00035684253,0.00059431675,0.0028649862,0.0374208,0.0138140675,0.011750729,0.007878555,0.0003246772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073902547,0.000020243342,0.0003777922,0.00002008979,0.0000016694354,0.000875608,0.06948116,0.00008147485,0.000071088565,0.9231792,0.0010572446,0.004827053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033051703,0.00009855839,0.003331211,0.0007281777,0.00002739748,0.0054537556,0.20918632,0.0018555947,0.001862948,0.47461566,0.30274466,0.00006270676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006981615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009239706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01650008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074786698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034549285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054261804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517139555","doi":"","title":"Reconceiving Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030506958084614153,"score_gpt":0.30359293618077937,"score_spread":0.2730859780961652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517139555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08980423,0.004752255,0.07586907,0.09095973,0.0008225696,0.00026957513,0.00012266787,0.00040606232,0.7369938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454054,0.0011259965,0.007601364,0.0049669235,0.00021615418,0.0000714238,0.000036313926,0.00012147303,0.040454946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969823,0.007917826,0.00065462134,0.0018903685,0.013923652,0.005790632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656505,0.0041620387,0.000756084,0.0018598841,0.004680082,0.0019767638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020154621,0.0007407558,0.00093923975,0.0038079256,0.016552076,0.02396146,0.0039677653,0.0069850697,0.0066939862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026008839,0.00062041637,0.00084615924,0.0022545776,0.056965664,0.015878545,0.021638462,0.00986398,0.0012423754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008566557,0.0000119841625,0.00031771624,0.000022576784,0.000005073006,0.00015210906,0.013650844,0.00013521135,0.00019311416,0.97456646,0.002514421,0.008422019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026896474,0.000041635278,0.0011803921,0.00042048897,0.000046887264,0.00045615755,0.019627547,0.0015896444,0.0014014755,0.68094677,0.29418033,0.00008187069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27129945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30974373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27129945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07042031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113342464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53944063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518073180","doi":"","title":"Jean Carol Boucher.\" L'appel à la Cour du Québec d'une décision du Tribunal administratif du Québec\".","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01736773204067625,"score_gpt":0.2504581679360994,"score_spread":0.2330904358954231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518073180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028079874,0.21614015,0.00092543376,0.66397274,0.023180338,0.00011246916,0.0020112055,0.0002228045,0.09062692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042485654,0.06847664,0.0012087469,0.35824463,0.00412647,0.00015588089,0.00069006707,0.00022272908,0.52438927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978728,0.00042656876,0.0000885108,0.00025077089,0.00094332587,0.00041799396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966807,0.0010599793,0.00019365596,0.000064924425,0.0016218232,0.00037889462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018926933,0.0011032211,0.00049097557,0.0014162381,0.0096630445,0.0033672974,0.0016667362,0.010192469,0.019783586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063368552,0.00057869265,0.0006014193,0.0019746902,0.0019957153,0.002550102,0.0012962174,0.0072476254,0.0060070595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017478205,0.000006474292,0.00042370177,0.00006031646,0.000004554252,0.000087113855,0.0005271301,0.000027092263,0.000052240484,0.0032964302,0.9869676,0.00852994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018056864,0.000008634257,0.006219773,0.0003308838,0.000010598251,0.00009479608,0.0023039745,0.00006214052,0.00019324978,0.0017126779,0.98900884,0.000036329922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90733325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96102893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90733325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012212884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017550487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18642491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518101157","doi":"","title":"The Problematic Revival of Section 229(c) of the Criminal Code","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Mens rea; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Conviction; Political science; Criminal code; Recklessness; Jury; Pretext; Homicide; Accidental; Criminology; Criminal law; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control","score_opus":0.016411850688049134,"score_gpt":0.30361685926737747,"score_spread":0.28720500857932835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518101157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15193686,0.0072392393,0.02981015,0.30750477,0.007830486,0.00028096186,0.00033525497,0.00043754964,0.4946248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7995691,0.0017712258,0.008036379,0.13892886,0.0025082529,0.00018595836,0.000121257006,0.0001853355,0.048693642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971913,0.0050847554,0.0015433033,0.0034309006,0.014935943,0.0030920762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676912,0.018601647,0.0022524083,0.0019787818,0.008315413,0.0011605832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01640561,0.00039567906,0.0005657562,0.0014972277,0.0074469666,0.009388567,0.0036398221,0.012918151,0.0017577091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044893365,0.0006073305,0.000853719,0.0009815791,0.014066081,0.0030889064,0.0034037172,0.018259594,0.00086707465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017208404,0.00002171636,0.0009756881,0.000057564943,0.000010064548,0.0004049244,0.0061490242,0.0003844544,0.00078593416,0.9410067,0.027953228,0.022233365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056699733,0.0003102195,0.011109426,0.0013987471,0.000075267395,0.002137671,0.009983738,0.002540792,0.0040647555,0.19225521,0.77574867,0.00031876075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14516756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18131088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14516756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015230588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02642208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2886452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519272843","doi":"","title":"Comparing ‘Appels’ and Oranges: An Examination of the Link between Appeal Processes and Judiciary Structures in Canada and France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.03341949782215095,"score_gpt":0.26418834079707515,"score_spread":0.2307688429749242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519272843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95502466,0.000913375,0.00058699225,0.0024650497,0.000025264684,0.00007004448,0.00031786793,0.000028163808,0.040568504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962908,0.00018047169,0.00025653184,0.0003640816,0.000012241752,0.000017691245,0.00017802414,0.00001421728,0.0026859217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98116916,0.004954341,0.00054601376,0.0014157934,0.0071767876,0.004737846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545942,0.016233716,0.0058841747,0.0011182373,0.017604597,0.004565191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008615776,0.00024200983,0.00063957536,0.006284022,0.008315086,0.006274004,0.002117478,0.0016132026,0.004394933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05678517,0.0003866822,0.00068942294,0.005775957,0.005371641,0.0018802823,0.003498631,0.0016981742,0.0003313617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010077087,0.00035933702,0.7592363,0.00020720536,0.0005053613,0.0007496887,0.07438805,0.0036664123,0.0016767179,0.07478639,0.013078689,0.07033817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034340086,0.00009181063,0.96182877,0.000086119966,0.000064258595,0.00006611578,0.019629145,0.0015352537,0.0001806851,0.0010789236,0.015341918,0.00006261556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98740023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06564456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06564456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042044915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4762869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519504190","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Hélèna Katz, Justice Miscarried: Inside Wrongful Convictions in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.015210332814278476,"score_gpt":0.29481736980840534,"score_spread":0.27960703699412687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519504190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020682054,0.8041349,0.000102064405,0.12495378,0.058286354,0.00004952392,0.0003399102,0.000028848946,0.011897808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032974426,0.8115338,0.00019430621,0.08834898,0.03690653,0.00009223019,0.00031972863,0.000065952874,0.05924115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828243,0.00023646212,0.00012426454,0.00018344488,0.001041592,0.00013185483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910691,0.0038408095,0.0005027556,0.00012277953,0.0037824225,0.00068221753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014095964,0.0011566448,0.002512005,0.003941687,0.0027658723,0.005223415,0.0029435765,0.0062127607,0.016731512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011071377,0.0007256582,0.0005985943,0.010137276,0.0028618101,0.0035725776,0.001311962,0.0061919685,0.0065195393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061495343,0.000003402469,0.000043145308,0.0004985036,0.0000060779535,0.00003445061,0.000075089985,0.000022770288,0.00001060821,0.00044044116,0.9905822,0.008277251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013514715,0.000010123202,0.00068789406,0.0026981991,0.000020310174,0.0003040528,0.00026425812,0.000025797553,0.000020075697,0.00047057332,0.9954646,0.000020614516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2512432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51960474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74875677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012369568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020465253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4995616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520347466","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047651","title":"<i>R v Hart</i>: A New Common Law Confession Rule for Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Common law; Criminal law; Certainty; Exclusionary rule; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04186499080328038,"score_gpt":0.31676668930801893,"score_spread":0.27490169850473856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520347466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042480752,0.0057346947,0.0461278,0.31144992,0.0072127907,0.0011100569,0.0020728756,0.0010828234,0.5827282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51150185,0.0021719646,0.041598782,0.32648382,0.0033299106,0.00060371193,0.0006097353,0.00031071418,0.1133896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.964783,0.0037652382,0.0024961077,0.004616893,0.018130437,0.0062083253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757237,0.008883552,0.0014257063,0.002214998,0.0102648055,0.0014872822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016451756,0.0006729333,0.0013726596,0.0018431734,0.013712869,0.01725457,0.009261273,0.024574665,0.002976702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03703618,0.0016883509,0.0018139422,0.0015987973,0.017740935,0.005706708,0.003582894,0.02306518,0.0014682163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776345,0.000024010451,0.00089744764,0.000056402645,0.00001869629,0.00043762324,0.0029625266,0.00028807967,0.000559325,0.8592278,0.12849903,0.0070014508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014649938,0.000094323004,0.005563113,0.00087980524,0.00018878431,0.00089909055,0.0031667023,0.0032299391,0.003057551,0.2221525,0.7600986,0.0005231915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8287508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036592044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08921358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34451544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522670710","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1232","title":"Section 7 of the Charter and the Principled Assignment of Legislative Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Denial; State (computer science); Public administration; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04174553504976886,"score_gpt":0.3260634755590338,"score_spread":0.28431794050926495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522670710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063965125,0.002208182,0.04342906,0.038345344,0.0027769844,0.00062931195,0.001058659,0.00038219383,0.9047738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50898904,0.003984207,0.09225667,0.096299864,0.002854979,0.0030119952,0.0013717358,0.00041175314,0.29081964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96589816,0.006353154,0.0022041758,0.003909522,0.014627778,0.0070072087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878352,0.0047607087,0.00061946915,0.0016458031,0.004433287,0.00070560933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015532832,0.0008878194,0.0009118532,0.0015403411,0.01136489,0.011620194,0.0032225654,0.013667952,0.0075729825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02196729,0.00134063,0.001813677,0.0013509992,0.02764697,0.003566916,0.0037949588,0.013916099,0.0027158777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008321624,0.0000060154866,0.00009946566,0.000021623546,0.0000029289697,0.00003778125,0.0007570525,0.00015503597,0.00010298746,0.98305744,0.013041315,0.002710101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062977226,0.00004115144,0.0013343688,0.00030095482,0.000033752156,0.00019685105,0.0006139118,0.0007462911,0.0008706357,0.33865595,0.65699023,0.0001528594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66351044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.628944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33648956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026475761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10050241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6769424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522895673","doi":"","title":"Common Law Police Powers and the Rule of Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Predictability; Common law; Political science; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022954663328689017,"score_gpt":0.31365202964521705,"score_spread":0.29069736631652804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522895673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034531437,0.008186606,0.0263966,0.05376273,0.00074762973,0.00009993011,0.00015612948,0.00012795145,0.875991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502111,0.002741219,0.0049035456,0.0058371658,0.00057695486,0.00007143822,0.00007014512,0.000055089786,0.03553345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98596746,0.002554851,0.00054494676,0.0022929248,0.00545064,0.0031892678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898137,0.004471862,0.0009507217,0.0013285934,0.0032597468,0.0010077972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008817257,0.00050630426,0.00079494773,0.002283531,0.009962929,0.015350386,0.002488909,0.0054488974,0.005881381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017604224,0.00052665675,0.00065927143,0.0020078085,0.073977485,0.008132606,0.0037265366,0.008614994,0.00097261666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016414199,0.0000027698022,0.00007886495,0.000006609915,0.0000015996239,0.00002064296,0.0004858594,0.00008795755,0.000015213544,0.9970797,0.00089834596,0.0013207815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013698461,0.000008172302,0.00060809695,0.0000725237,0.000006505847,0.00003292973,0.00047671847,0.00045754982,0.00007795913,0.95239204,0.04583459,0.0000192459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3461609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2011045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3461609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026188565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029511956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.688292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526342888","doi":"10.21991/c9r67h","title":"Charkaoui: Beyond Anti-Terrorism, Procedural Fairness, and Section 7 of the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Terrorism; Political science; Law; Immigration; Government (linguistics); Section (typography); Refugee; Business","score_opus":0.03484792083386847,"score_gpt":0.2658367904835917,"score_spread":0.23098886964972323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526342888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04784275,0.0112353545,0.0059758467,0.2594419,0.0017198502,0.00016341638,0.00041922057,0.00012514091,0.67307645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86396503,0.0037136988,0.0057320087,0.06577536,0.0010179125,0.00016667371,0.0002626811,0.000070826936,0.05929586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98138475,0.0031274802,0.0004024705,0.0010143381,0.0091687245,0.0049022664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148406,0.008057956,0.0011841501,0.0010116419,0.006771212,0.0014908939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014759722,0.00037108516,0.0006703329,0.0017239413,0.014334631,0.012349533,0.00270274,0.009408745,0.004006849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02474523,0.0004088984,0.0004166758,0.001598659,0.022395073,0.0036235203,0.0026495643,0.013985697,0.0005254674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024238312,0.000013660015,0.0010752255,0.000039473904,0.000006706785,0.00010583347,0.0017418073,0.00012526453,0.000111867834,0.9607271,0.027756004,0.008272882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009920037,0.000049281145,0.011885575,0.0011582992,0.00008578177,0.00020783248,0.005390595,0.0013167494,0.0016633918,0.52152985,0.4564361,0.00017742084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8314179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8961625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16858208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04215863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14785208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33914977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526424115","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Duty and Discretion: The Attorney General in the Charter Era","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Duty; Legislation; Law; Scrutiny; Political science; House of Commons; Discretion; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Democracy; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.02027537683318832,"score_gpt":0.30708910682330437,"score_spread":0.28681372999011606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526424115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1047609,0.017046893,0.06425112,0.34940132,0.003477646,0.00014188848,0.000046271205,0.00016925352,0.46070474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93141735,0.0022341928,0.0067042154,0.03286961,0.0016172165,0.00008755396,0.000021354934,0.00010127103,0.024947349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9344474,0.03117617,0.0024155325,0.0048351837,0.017770616,0.009355217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9437292,0.037798047,0.003879957,0.0051743756,0.0062192134,0.0031992632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055224355,0.00046702364,0.001010699,0.0037607157,0.014537076,0.023150343,0.0031552734,0.01825237,0.0023778568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07066251,0.00073806907,0.00082183373,0.0028180063,0.057869077,0.020954113,0.012535407,0.016612539,0.0005049553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015944068,0.0000133019375,0.0005126366,0.000013576668,0.000004327123,0.00012603989,0.0057468517,0.00017749403,0.000070312715,0.98367184,0.002489487,0.0071582305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000737588,0.00007260004,0.0025979122,0.0004558993,0.00003704001,0.0002042819,0.007502047,0.0011119015,0.0005334224,0.7977953,0.18950982,0.000106030195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07885795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072645776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07885795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025456404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04332204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2920578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527184592","doi":"","title":"A Flawed Compass: A Human Rights Analysis of the Roadmap to Strengthening Public Safety","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Scrutiny; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Mandate; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.04969152503861261,"score_gpt":0.352417466790031,"score_spread":0.30272594175141837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527184592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04113377,0.0048771654,0.008619593,0.29069868,0.001014289,0.00064943405,0.00069234957,0.00007411492,0.65224063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835339,0.003926885,0.0055585285,0.07396449,0.0005085606,0.00041417492,0.00035932084,0.00014182014,0.07978718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571648,0.013386853,0.0007410287,0.0017955595,0.017243242,0.009668528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96729046,0.0144133875,0.001565121,0.0018036608,0.012571844,0.0023555714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02826278,0.00067109877,0.0007088759,0.006363136,0.015107185,0.021562465,0.0037234612,0.010765453,0.014472792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062302463,0.0005881562,0.0012953898,0.0066411598,0.03217808,0.014318182,0.008099628,0.014302404,0.0011621314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016954831,0.000018582175,0.0009281713,0.00004656715,0.0000071553673,0.00011381345,0.005321631,0.00024085208,0.000030477713,0.970009,0.017245779,0.0060210153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063841,0.00012343851,0.01115559,0.0010890352,0.00007561247,0.00018734705,0.06395038,0.0021766843,0.00049439585,0.48963356,0.43090916,0.00014085187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5151672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49671927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5151672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05439634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11251195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529430945","doi":"","title":"In Harm’s Way: The Limits to Legislating Criminal Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm principle; Law; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Harm; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Criminal law; Discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.11598880782107583,"score_gpt":0.37274322908642266,"score_spread":0.2567544212653468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529430945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04793309,0.015382305,0.08109795,0.2786516,0.0018950922,0.00017801138,0.00017250412,0.00017254493,0.57451695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89846486,0.0038100467,0.019626549,0.054766078,0.0017647535,0.0005613477,0.00009696855,0.00012808958,0.020781264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9389838,0.029984483,0.0030831322,0.006839948,0.017219387,0.0038892464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94126296,0.044085253,0.0028209782,0.0054699266,0.005025512,0.0013353664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05008745,0.00052154553,0.0010674517,0.0023813874,0.01050273,0.019665917,0.003752086,0.015038935,0.0026668124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077478096,0.0010918701,0.0013080891,0.001450264,0.070291504,0.017997604,0.008348547,0.02170849,0.00066919863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007697471,0.000013117662,0.00020583546,0.000024741003,0.0000061218193,0.0000291276,0.0018691936,0.00023547333,0.00009488638,0.989262,0.0029283548,0.005323451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002028282,0.000030209438,0.000559037,0.00026555636,0.000017195824,0.000058639933,0.0019860284,0.0004300356,0.00037185845,0.9267438,0.06947749,0.000039858518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019897347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021191249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05008745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072819386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014743714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2648909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532419641","doi":"","title":"Sustainability and the Courts: A Snapshot of Canada in 2009","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Ecology; Database","score_opus":0.006305023844079425,"score_gpt":0.2799499710413897,"score_spread":0.27364494719731025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532419641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53437287,0.0391987,0.001545322,0.14681935,0.0010480206,0.00039210738,0.024760643,0.0003064983,0.25155655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8803372,0.013060308,0.0020286194,0.010924093,0.00015844796,0.00008435936,0.0028633818,0.00010393908,0.09043967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966286,0.00017299864,0.00008910116,0.00019114572,0.0014409302,0.0014772266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99148,0.00045314012,0.000508695,0.0001234478,0.0045544,0.0028803698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010464401,0.00030380182,0.00057532825,0.0035195032,0.01140309,0.009364229,0.0020176393,0.0025236078,0.007994137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056411037,0.0004983399,0.0005985287,0.010277382,0.002832779,0.0019029079,0.003041394,0.0031974108,0.0003798637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032512768,0.0002651142,0.24996558,0.0009869526,0.00031013618,0.003968333,0.02384555,0.0028048095,0.0012801039,0.12746823,0.34485078,0.24392934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027466884,0.00004986742,0.40123525,0.00063258264,0.000093555114,0.00037491668,0.031637266,0.0007917656,0.00037983965,0.003800683,0.5608356,0.00014113178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99781585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17563502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17563502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33824822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95614654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532661443","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1216","title":"The Journalist-Source Privilege in Quebec Civil Law: Globe and Mail v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing); Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Globe; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.04143474144170627,"score_gpt":0.2844770461666488,"score_spread":0.24304230472494254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532661443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49331003,0.04594871,0.0020356702,0.11346721,0.0010253727,0.00035506647,0.0019480919,0.00010057996,0.34180918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381101,0.005924298,0.0007806918,0.018851792,0.00013075967,0.000056720564,0.00021629548,0.000021579099,0.035907753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958443,0.0004933758,0.00011399849,0.00040209715,0.0015830043,0.0015632166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929549,0.0028113052,0.00045436533,0.00018015514,0.0026618592,0.0009373153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046861176,0.0003468422,0.00039400146,0.0031523409,0.018694876,0.0076332865,0.0020816063,0.006837568,0.003976887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011130706,0.00042089206,0.00048192573,0.0041022426,0.0064026653,0.0017880745,0.0016682128,0.0043967594,0.00024339711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026787748,0.00016799208,0.05614172,0.0004905744,0.00015297138,0.0067271474,0.04719883,0.0011426916,0.0018066538,0.64317775,0.1751319,0.067593984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021875152,0.00019601166,0.25840303,0.0013339819,0.00050098845,0.0016599718,0.047309857,0.002433323,0.0040618284,0.023874698,0.6594203,0.00058728684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119176246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119176246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120567195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8646882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533569213","doi":"","title":"The Chimera of the Real and Substantial Connection Test","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Test (biology); Law; Supreme court; Honour; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02315052089063038,"score_gpt":0.30922388047761773,"score_spread":0.2860733595869874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533569213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12700272,0.0020412814,0.21316124,0.04945741,0.0017151143,0.0004531591,0.00093687617,0.000444557,0.6047876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579852,0.0002977907,0.027235115,0.004744763,0.00036076378,0.00039491343,0.00024729516,0.00014670378,0.008587421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708592,0.01587666,0.0015043486,0.004106644,0.006448104,0.001205054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326395,0.048102006,0.0029109952,0.0074590975,0.0073381728,0.0015502996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020722836,0.00047663922,0.0011133098,0.0024535588,0.0033127095,0.0056902086,0.0027215702,0.003777607,0.0161224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13171808,0.00041076535,0.0011023013,0.0020807774,0.023872262,0.017733641,0.0072856722,0.0072630183,0.0019167245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008386521,0.000017278478,0.0019311399,0.00003384824,0.000019464936,0.0001071164,0.00066709676,0.00021504142,0.00013955179,0.9811872,0.0034416702,0.012156766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005011816,0.00009681418,0.0022281536,0.00008314215,0.000034946763,0.00037792028,0.0007888965,0.0031890175,0.00084668736,0.96424526,0.02800515,0.000053826603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003256332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026608785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020722836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002850724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034044369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10959417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534048536","doi":"","title":"Social Host Liability in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Liability; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010936009675002644,"score_gpt":0.2761102150038482,"score_spread":0.26517420532884556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534048536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2566269,0.006517312,0.001637849,0.074891105,0.000804217,0.00014081133,0.0007721651,0.00009554841,0.6585141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026252,0.004373904,0.00079048175,0.02680665,0.00017153595,0.000057561934,0.0002579427,0.000023488585,0.06489314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964149,0.0002503145,0.000084949366,0.00026917877,0.0012946731,0.0016859379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968759,0.0005137399,0.00022966339,0.00013781518,0.0012223748,0.001020495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014578596,0.00036815627,0.0002943335,0.001193323,0.02005184,0.0038113734,0.0016173474,0.0059146364,0.0065563465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008021223,0.00043489493,0.0004954974,0.0017141812,0.004613825,0.0009953154,0.0034963505,0.0054348605,0.000425244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011082091,0.00007179374,0.038707662,0.00013337754,0.00006676295,0.0063372073,0.011440556,0.0008370329,0.0009026529,0.7255114,0.17507139,0.04080934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020789221,0.00019672443,0.09244183,0.000999516,0.00037355046,0.0039087655,0.01986176,0.0028800576,0.0023210996,0.051379852,0.8251359,0.00029311265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98619765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99308044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.130084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34629977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534827492","doi":"10.29173/alr99","title":"Causation in Canadian Insurance Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Liability insurance; Liability; Insurance policy; Actuarial science; Tort; Insurance law; Casualty insurance; Business; Auto insurance risk selection; Key person insurance; Economics; General insurance; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03141934140317674,"score_gpt":0.3206979214174632,"score_spread":0.28927858001428647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534827492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038320366,0.059744637,0.0055436813,0.07622094,0.0012233855,0.00022237707,0.00088035915,0.0000976881,0.8177466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87875164,0.04194296,0.0044276714,0.013159695,0.0004783527,0.00008730387,0.00056237704,0.00004877248,0.06054123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875606,0.0012356902,0.00045691206,0.0011709745,0.0069757965,0.0026000754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889286,0.0029396885,0.0006585149,0.00044227974,0.0062655876,0.0007652352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008401355,0.0005158812,0.00067059364,0.009642272,0.01806543,0.008816345,0.0025269014,0.0043120645,0.012548406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027848296,0.00067288295,0.00094652537,0.008688249,0.011662994,0.0034290273,0.003559739,0.0040460094,0.00051632297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009312416,0.000010505138,0.004167401,0.00018714642,0.000019973082,0.00034546855,0.0026100327,0.00053734676,0.00005903381,0.937741,0.025658777,0.028654005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035114197,0.000023962204,0.046177074,0.0017281235,0.00016541887,0.0007040707,0.005641775,0.0024686402,0.0003245506,0.22425674,0.71830404,0.00017053641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98703486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17176618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17176618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1887541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9606338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535297782","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Australian and Canadian Anti-terrorism Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Charter; Law; Political science; National security","score_opus":0.03959968419385505,"score_gpt":0.3756960561318573,"score_spread":0.33609637193800224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535297782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.458155,0.0036389353,0.0004859422,0.011116822,0.00027345604,0.00017398178,0.0030227648,0.00006938372,0.5230636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95783854,0.0024818885,0.0007984807,0.0024195903,0.000044336964,0.0000570628,0.0015499117,0.000030239999,0.03478002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884487,0.0005799376,0.00030696447,0.00043724937,0.0077546122,0.0024725592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98576516,0.001602054,0.0011616186,0.0004268059,0.009700379,0.0013439994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034432802,0.00025262014,0.00035462528,0.007435122,0.007738086,0.003691795,0.0013906056,0.0008863228,0.00812416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017415669,0.00030957727,0.0005210842,0.00986706,0.0017979043,0.000890839,0.0018056872,0.0013590266,0.00046886227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007577931,0.0003193166,0.29154897,0.0013376053,0.00028294226,0.0020948006,0.11626986,0.0018960598,0.0033605658,0.20984928,0.14015651,0.23212641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016068248,0.00005602468,0.7836506,0.00023430468,0.00006505159,0.00024084072,0.022356551,0.00043497313,0.00038893847,0.0010254695,0.19146016,0.00007103077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98767626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068149805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068149805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05312506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49446374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536848170","doi":"","title":"Secret Evidence and the Due Process of Terrorist Detentions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Terrorism; Dilemma; Political science; Process (computing); Intelligence analysis; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03060036457333357,"score_gpt":0.3263640262883576,"score_spread":0.295763661715024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536848170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24675085,0.009506422,0.23348461,0.15485983,0.001647718,0.0007735247,0.0003033698,0.00018166524,0.3524921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97965163,0.0009000283,0.007382424,0.00278982,0.00049572776,0.00019659783,0.00002530965,0.000031260282,0.008527222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94466937,0.030438228,0.002823931,0.005754861,0.010008225,0.0063055474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8876671,0.08320369,0.009629094,0.011102865,0.0062170583,0.0021801584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06798831,0.0005600412,0.0015280574,0.0029724285,0.00734975,0.010735649,0.0029827424,0.014253104,0.006490612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18934335,0.0008304387,0.0014712078,0.0019007509,0.025095392,0.014445761,0.008261528,0.012254046,0.00084812567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021528362,0.000017566044,0.0006097335,0.000014181474,0.000010800289,0.00007773939,0.00058480824,0.0005979636,0.000061200764,0.99426043,0.00047176197,0.0032722345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051525494,0.000026638998,0.00066579436,0.00006554009,0.00001591241,0.00006803701,0.00025447333,0.0024652136,0.00020365069,0.99123645,0.0049198125,0.00002708605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006002782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045664757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06798831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007329898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008925246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35956085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W153742565","doi":"","title":"The Proportionality Principle, Counter-Terrorism Laws and Human Rights: A German-Australian Comparison","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Public law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Criminal law; Terrorism","score_opus":0.02413193335707089,"score_gpt":0.3907962341262353,"score_spread":0.36666430076916445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153742565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20160574,0.03778486,0.00577965,0.0152835585,0.0003030653,0.000048778336,0.00015732224,0.000022405347,0.7390147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499845,0.013703324,0.0014253523,0.0020470435,0.000111073205,0.000026763562,0.00008967788,0.000015167284,0.032597076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833053,0.0006697377,0.00007216114,0.0001474992,0.00041650014,0.00036362448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928916,0.00026766726,0.00015509293,0.00005259945,0.00014527261,0.00009010732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014208502,0.00026391682,0.00018003126,0.0029259487,0.001402049,0.0032210678,0.00048484263,0.0012582258,0.004310122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020462293,0.00013221131,0.00022022471,0.0036623543,0.0064564077,0.002349945,0.002135323,0.0010471366,0.00030376358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035893278,0.00003620913,0.0036980384,0.00018889435,0.000015249871,0.0002972309,0.00831343,0.00057844736,0.00040517226,0.9464705,0.002832582,0.037128292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023814808,0.00025413124,0.16324918,0.00097320403,0.00007497433,0.0011557745,0.020361166,0.0021155712,0.0012007905,0.21590272,0.59463185,0.000056740046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05509158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07440546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05509158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072274036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023908312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10954183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538339521","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Hope for the Innocent?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Commission; Criminal justice; Criminal case; Economic Justice; Test (biology); Criminal trial; Index (typography); Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.3043360029925013,"score_gpt":0.45668675107153356,"score_spread":0.15235074807903226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538339521","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017223478,0.2811094,0.0011415852,0.34704953,0.09063097,0.0005430144,0.00081307424,0.00045096115,0.27808917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005624754,0.1906896,0.0028059175,0.15146674,0.052823827,0.0012226214,0.0012969249,0.0005998058,0.59346986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757479,0.0041878032,0.0021158196,0.0017934736,0.014571462,0.0015835676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434996,0.023997474,0.0037972892,0.0032335173,0.02105977,0.0044122655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018100068,0.0011777629,0.0024632916,0.010310135,0.0051615424,0.020178812,0.0033379665,0.013243998,0.0589259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065023415,0.0012195394,0.00096522924,0.01102997,0.0065463474,0.011386106,0.003680166,0.009156458,0.051503327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010777497,0.000002356493,0.000011501372,0.00011485494,7.148454e-7,0.000015511792,0.000045045625,0.000010436197,0.000009190136,0.006642238,0.9853548,0.0077923816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018800173,0.0000020068715,0.0000741839,0.0008805101,0.0000012934559,0.000030582218,0.000057335703,0.000009630918,0.000007966125,0.0024893444,0.996439,0.0000061722335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035633985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05654784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0589259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018361386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034984976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19712675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541607608","doi":"10.11575/prism/29741","title":"It Came From South of The Border: Effects of the USA PATRIOT Act and More on Canadian Libraries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Legislation; Patriot Act; Subsidiary; Political science; Business; Public administration; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.010430008022406501,"score_gpt":0.22562567583462964,"score_spread":0.21519566781222313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541607608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5640448,0.0042893933,0.00019384637,0.08316889,0.00048112255,0.000100551064,0.0011083938,0.000040247072,0.34657285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464372,0.0040275813,0.00014016863,0.018292956,0.000111876296,0.000029898032,0.00040468381,0.000045291257,0.03051038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866844,0.001450594,0.00027304192,0.00055143493,0.0058677276,0.0051729428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97772,0.003964396,0.0020903514,0.000543336,0.011983513,0.0036983755],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047079967,0.00046556353,0.00087550184,0.0052371244,0.050554715,0.011437339,0.0029171046,0.0037437128,0.013001397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02985867,0.00044678577,0.0011182091,0.011171229,0.008068542,0.0035782668,0.0061023673,0.006576737,0.0007244332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011600234,0.00063125486,0.2395767,0.0005716049,0.00043601348,0.004648019,0.18530957,0.0024429467,0.0011229911,0.16104053,0.27141514,0.13164525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013945531,0.0001600654,0.31369588,0.0011293275,0.00070394774,0.00066311174,0.41492563,0.00066050293,0.001394012,0.005290288,0.26075193,0.00048588953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99665254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98856264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14110476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16232939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99619675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544197200","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, Canadian and American Hearsay and Confrontation Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Jurisprudence; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05538563774118799,"score_gpt":0.3946579378165523,"score_spread":0.3392723000753643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544197200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007768731,0.024493845,0.037883718,0.69208056,0.003272775,0.00013448828,0.00012534228,0.0001661466,0.23407441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73208916,0.016000485,0.046157584,0.15725723,0.0037651144,0.00037715794,0.00012985842,0.00021109867,0.044012308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471324,0.01254534,0.0017073217,0.0038988474,0.030318407,0.004397649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638142,0.017952042,0.0013188149,0.0015557721,0.013811419,0.0015477941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041635793,0.00088977517,0.0015573774,0.008129521,0.023193043,0.022947412,0.008698398,0.018636925,0.003419638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05659211,0.00081984256,0.0016865693,0.0068014185,0.100685194,0.013021177,0.0070097675,0.02381768,0.0005785035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000420065,0.0000052003948,0.00008156335,0.000044609653,0.0000036298375,0.000039730487,0.0020660576,0.00009345427,0.00002684423,0.9873461,0.004677527,0.0056110546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042600986,0.000023534241,0.0010344451,0.00087315607,0.000049096325,0.00012686434,0.0051428126,0.0011154277,0.00023859105,0.76258373,0.22866985,0.00009981579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7691718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7830913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23082823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0810883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18314521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58833957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544416007","doi":"","title":"The Rebirth of Bicycling Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; The Renaissance; Political science; Cycling; Enforcement; Law; Order (exchange); Law enforcement; Environmental law; Public administration; Business; Geography; History","score_opus":0.03096553146203026,"score_gpt":0.26427190770232517,"score_spread":0.2333063762402949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544416007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07559085,0.035041545,0.013556863,0.28786376,0.0023947998,0.000061037,0.0001886171,0.00007267621,0.5852299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90831846,0.012053442,0.0022293234,0.035018526,0.001251664,0.000076880344,0.00010901254,0.00006550456,0.040877115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912124,0.003384314,0.00038969947,0.0014282769,0.0023987656,0.0011864485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844296,0.0071550338,0.0005190152,0.0009807136,0.0022149952,0.00068721146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00887812,0.00032091112,0.0005364019,0.0024794752,0.0072786165,0.008787137,0.0014422237,0.0051618484,0.005532564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023098614,0.00046256432,0.00035635912,0.0015926757,0.04102821,0.01071442,0.005398575,0.009059651,0.00064919377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005877424,0.000006930835,0.00042465582,0.000035707224,0.0000023686482,0.00005953575,0.005558044,0.000057932022,0.000040631418,0.9759409,0.0056304215,0.012236918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015638643,0.000034759305,0.0031893982,0.0013025737,0.000011599054,0.00019968461,0.0114699965,0.00032105113,0.0002782024,0.37709507,0.606042,0.00004007381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085868955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06987659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91413105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009604026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01178506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17073828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545986919","doi":"","title":"Proportionate Liability Under the CBCA in the Context of Recent Corporate Governance Reform: Canadian Auditors in the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Audit; Corporate governance; Accounting; Business; Legislation; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Limited liability partnership; Going concern; Sarbanes–Oxley Act; Legal liability; Law; Political science; Auditor's report; Finance","score_opus":0.026533791800995556,"score_gpt":0.2779171014756111,"score_spread":0.25138330967461553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545986919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17966408,0.012983717,0.005982993,0.59924704,0.0013871582,0.00017450402,0.00025095948,0.000090560156,0.20021902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914405,0.0042467443,0.0017736118,0.07026867,0.00057334383,0.000061593426,0.00005703055,0.000018872419,0.00859509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96454716,0.007775135,0.0011334342,0.002968203,0.01424152,0.009334532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96418774,0.011344438,0.0048301676,0.0023968343,0.0139688505,0.003271919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023338323,0.0002834666,0.00069762074,0.0021115136,0.01590775,0.011597603,0.003102825,0.011856472,0.0032568488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08455389,0.00051919575,0.00071603555,0.0036266223,0.020861404,0.008667427,0.005388681,0.0115354555,0.00033421072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012184288,0.00006507639,0.013357821,0.00021694551,0.000054242897,0.0008412581,0.013107399,0.0011129936,0.0004893271,0.8994523,0.037145916,0.034034785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035095648,0.0003733469,0.10615436,0.0024014055,0.0006082243,0.0015189926,0.033025343,0.0057618096,0.0021290944,0.34223986,0.504752,0.00068464957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94228685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.950036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07200472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07200472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1669021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5224333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548647802","doi":"","title":"Ambiguous Cause-in-Fact and Structured Causation: A Multi-Jurisdictional Approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Common law; Law; Tort; Law and economics; Political science; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.028767843018887945,"score_gpt":0.30975134549549177,"score_spread":0.2809835024766038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548647802","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04710029,0.0046650814,0.58090174,0.0282897,0.00047292028,0.0002973628,0.00007395551,0.00013083882,0.33806822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150923,0.0011962929,0.07195412,0.0025805242,0.00029717688,0.00028868794,0.000029108493,0.00004734568,0.008514541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97646093,0.012987526,0.0007419222,0.0017478383,0.0067948406,0.0012669247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98375344,0.0102422815,0.0011708811,0.0023581993,0.0019479067,0.0005273673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019749606,0.0005829189,0.0009419731,0.00539013,0.006923003,0.010865531,0.003963215,0.0068403953,0.003148696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024124984,0.0007304393,0.0013754849,0.0021229368,0.054374684,0.0129752355,0.008478354,0.0068279407,0.00033020877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.622254e-7,0.0000024219266,0.00007140342,0.000005465162,0.000001771683,0.000035421093,0.0004146243,0.00028819742,0.000021345797,0.9979234,0.00009205414,0.0011429288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006360998,0.000013172604,0.0002784403,0.0000887826,0.000011135191,0.000106190484,0.0005976531,0.0028657585,0.00013140916,0.9854989,0.010386135,0.000016096603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006517452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019749606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010531014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104447186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549952279","doi":"","title":"Common Law Police Powers and Exclusion of Evidence: The Renaissance of Good Faith","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Statutory law; Obligation; Charter","score_opus":0.0442284115639389,"score_gpt":0.32478520024062507,"score_spread":0.28055678867668615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549952279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03262576,0.043933228,0.020975284,0.6678582,0.0023061275,0.00008761381,0.00013204738,0.00014138717,0.23194037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89836645,0.015066571,0.00509653,0.059527304,0.0016740236,0.000048159694,0.000036449004,0.0001318878,0.020052677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95105547,0.012190748,0.0017806924,0.0057416693,0.023207892,0.0060235513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89493483,0.06317142,0.0044919834,0.01007191,0.020602321,0.006727586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046964075,0.0006664577,0.0013123457,0.0042579537,0.016643643,0.030566609,0.0052532717,0.012249142,0.003178893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0851198,0.0010585695,0.000801794,0.003438143,0.18228436,0.01573471,0.009563648,0.02469991,0.00031836084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014360895,0.000011453893,0.0005408652,0.000066079585,0.000016665477,0.00010702611,0.005780877,0.0003161899,0.00008911659,0.97421646,0.006942433,0.011898331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049263694,0.000035890553,0.0038692052,0.00091807207,0.000041766994,0.00012767653,0.0063705374,0.0011385351,0.00051911944,0.7694152,0.21736594,0.00014885828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8195491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.796357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10026735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12172939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72749394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550062160","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice: The Impact of Injunctions, Contempt of Court Proceedings, and Costs Awards on Environmental Protestors and First Nations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Political science; Imprisonment; Legislation; Economic Justice; Human rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01699583569190439,"score_gpt":0.34010446155599167,"score_spread":0.3231086258640873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550062160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503121,0.0007324148,0.000057010748,0.008500245,0.000037508416,0.000051058116,0.00007992589,0.000005598764,0.040224142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955953,0.0003263876,0.000029011237,0.0009674116,0.000020468466,0.00002562529,0.00002101484,0.0000022722145,0.0030125414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102014,0.0030560312,0.00026394427,0.00028764308,0.00177881,0.0035934527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96629846,0.019661296,0.0060745394,0.0005804318,0.0019717403,0.005413561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004506264,0.00022159358,0.00044702922,0.0012390735,0.01093969,0.0047816625,0.0016219274,0.0035135779,0.008867223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03942297,0.00039727372,0.0005883393,0.0013386945,0.009878843,0.002560839,0.0057610143,0.004591686,0.00034595715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029708347,0.008070916,0.60648286,0.00040088335,0.0005990076,0.00676774,0.16303782,0.0031869109,0.0017498614,0.07525095,0.03312887,0.098353386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033368473,0.0016117207,0.8154017,0.00041111122,0.00030842298,0.0005124671,0.1354737,0.0016465667,0.0006331229,0.014683619,0.028817799,0.0001661106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5741633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.840112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42583668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021579461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011678058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85668904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552903448","doi":"","title":"L’influence des médias électroniques sur la formation de l’opinion publique : du mythe à la réalité","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011239523625749481,"score_gpt":0.21399876812094848,"score_spread":0.202759244495199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552903448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23039441,0.04520968,0.05822735,0.19570428,0.006962987,0.00028597156,0.00075347885,0.00018562865,0.46227613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89015347,0.022298362,0.00939871,0.013366761,0.0043259077,0.0004267743,0.00020149145,0.00025328813,0.059575297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644333,0.0020826515,0.00011228104,0.0003647028,0.00077961833,0.00021745334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676406,0.026719421,0.0017665201,0.0009131903,0.0025235019,0.00043675056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056857266,0.00067202456,0.00042062116,0.0025984948,0.0026973432,0.012823122,0.0011206778,0.002377393,0.01678176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024078796,0.00037148086,0.00070458156,0.0021272332,0.008413603,0.013347147,0.003760739,0.0031231765,0.0016938944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004661066,0.00015162169,0.016366089,0.002324795,0.0001465871,0.0011876541,0.21666357,0.00054383423,0.0038211793,0.61090297,0.0250196,0.122406095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006967394,0.00028709276,0.032171994,0.0035799427,0.00020848679,0.0011122259,0.1948687,0.002311548,0.004029768,0.18277006,0.5784178,0.00017273006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003255148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031888236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028280024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018022525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056140542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554861059","doi":"","title":"Be Careful What You Wish For? Terrorism Prosecutions in Post-9/11 Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Torture; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Deportation; Legislature; Punishment (psychology); Scholarship; Criminology; Immigration; Human rights; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01282732146322533,"score_gpt":0.2812383531742361,"score_spread":0.2684110317110108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554861059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7017199,0.009929707,0.000294968,0.14456895,0.0010824295,0.00034230723,0.0008797891,0.000062625455,0.14111936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608263,0.0059755365,0.00036848144,0.014550206,0.00011710712,0.000041417883,0.00023825416,0.000023871777,0.017859038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637043,0.00040220906,0.00012777065,0.00014958686,0.0011677919,0.001782204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988044,0.0014085677,0.001158539,0.00016774543,0.0037867199,0.0035979599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021300106,0.00017578212,0.0002769204,0.0016173626,0.014981597,0.003963083,0.0014571166,0.0025990992,0.003874533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013018364,0.00048811483,0.00022713409,0.0021414,0.003466621,0.00093287096,0.0015919562,0.0046513113,0.0003450895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059460243,0.00070410536,0.38654038,0.00085555576,0.0001277244,0.010589417,0.064281225,0.0009602636,0.0011637028,0.049031794,0.30081308,0.18433821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015449051,0.0002595055,0.608622,0.0015719605,0.00016407174,0.0019062398,0.11622175,0.0008586231,0.0012897183,0.0030127475,0.26571742,0.00022146801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071990326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071990326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19590561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52232885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555190754","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683.014","title":"The post-9/11 migration of Britain's Terrorism Act 2000","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Globe; Political science; Law; Politics; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.038543922509763344,"score_gpt":0.25947983713298467,"score_spread":0.22093591462322132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555190754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17209718,0.021482773,0.0012673319,0.040853083,0.0016072316,0.00008737361,0.0005484107,0.000050879833,0.76200575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70594484,0.018890413,0.0008292478,0.010597122,0.00037564273,0.00010387002,0.00061821064,0.000051825493,0.26258877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982608,0.0004769912,0.00007239977,0.00009694223,0.00081435766,0.00027862508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988562,0.0005303342,0.00020954329,0.00007502835,0.0002489492,0.000079899255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013234919,0.000238511,0.00014421833,0.0009875463,0.0028362318,0.003420972,0.0005037469,0.0018077295,0.0032668342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029047898,0.0002957842,0.00012487525,0.0015227768,0.004996234,0.0012265426,0.0012166215,0.0035502936,0.0007009492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010997859,0.0000616142,0.010296369,0.00046506154,0.000016559341,0.0011507882,0.06390764,0.00048646898,0.0012938658,0.61061656,0.19944996,0.112145245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013371366,0.000037113965,0.05131418,0.000560301,0.000009038084,0.0003495992,0.008113958,0.00011308218,0.00071498967,0.0064019,0.9323496,0.000022726159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11371522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2302048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11371522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008594639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005473296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22610664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556567886","doi":"","title":"Governance and Anarchy in the S.2(B) Jurisprudence: A Comment on Vancouver Sun and Harper v. Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Parliament; Law; Charter; Political science; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Corporate governance; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.016026220415887815,"score_gpt":0.27559777243190337,"score_spread":0.25957155201601556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556567886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025815446,0.017970895,0.0024311147,0.6349565,0.0026223843,0.00018721873,0.0005351896,0.00010223482,0.31537902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4311701,0.00723108,0.0023275958,0.44032922,0.001388405,0.00021964278,0.0002052079,0.0001586568,0.11697003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98026526,0.0025675807,0.0004028054,0.001536422,0.009512397,0.0057156384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163765,0.0039845323,0.0003630339,0.000234879,0.0025739805,0.0012059195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073104003,0.0007922854,0.0011057277,0.002088344,0.046117526,0.02069033,0.0064912946,0.024526976,0.0038199811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018280735,0.0012989925,0.0015281433,0.0037938158,0.029405665,0.0030741126,0.0041038482,0.026478758,0.0005789389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023519999,0.000022420949,0.00078104174,0.00006183819,0.000013983863,0.0004098412,0.0071706236,0.00028805176,0.00020559465,0.85977316,0.12586647,0.0053833863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015776776,0.00005098124,0.008999028,0.0007029861,0.000091646674,0.00027584715,0.012850659,0.0012529991,0.00083336304,0.15721737,0.8172304,0.00033700257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11653846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11653846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18498391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84554964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556715205","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Cincinnati law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Law; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Homicide; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychology; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.05866183048251948,"score_gpt":0.24791293127653288,"score_spread":0.18925110079401342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556715205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5217754,0.02456903,0.00060103904,0.120975964,0.0012253163,0.00032715575,0.003407494,0.00009377001,0.32702485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678019,0.008625742,0.00029247804,0.010492178,0.00009087304,0.000028659611,0.00063616066,0.000022971177,0.012008909],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946825,0.00036708763,0.00018930953,0.00028712233,0.0024412659,0.0020326546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98592687,0.0016888689,0.0013797969,0.00032883222,0.006292822,0.0043827593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022461559,0.00024355935,0.00056363124,0.0032202548,0.01353844,0.0033229238,0.0021488378,0.002443711,0.007971374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016599942,0.0004495335,0.0005244819,0.0052391523,0.0029412839,0.00069570733,0.0025938088,0.004346181,0.00030643085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021685332,0.00037254038,0.3210114,0.00067166716,0.00023140461,0.008492304,0.020300245,0.0024560364,0.0005048424,0.14560433,0.32259867,0.17753968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014491,0.0001130484,0.728832,0.0018042282,0.00029566657,0.0024622192,0.024084061,0.0026193808,0.0006167382,0.016966624,0.22169694,0.00036422833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10046991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10046991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1973613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7289636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560253997","doi":"","title":"New Strategies for Enforcement of the Access to Information Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Compliance (psychology); Government (linguistics); Law enforcement; Business; Law; Political science; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.041996010761305526,"score_gpt":0.33917820612983285,"score_spread":0.2971821953685273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560253997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014545748,0.009966671,0.10142452,0.51869416,0.0035417213,0.00075380097,0.00009458357,0.0007236386,0.35025522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50733083,0.009939502,0.15340996,0.15749192,0.0064473795,0.0028047943,0.00029389278,0.00047986588,0.16180192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9403002,0.028232552,0.0036563904,0.0063770865,0.01825508,0.0031787832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89366764,0.068278246,0.0070961523,0.013126457,0.014425848,0.0034056315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07033794,0.0011256235,0.00093356456,0.0076532112,0.006802356,0.021740753,0.0046221325,0.017119192,0.010835285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109308764,0.0008872616,0.0014143317,0.003803838,0.025307221,0.027347988,0.009263018,0.015058838,0.0025037548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018062572,0.00011052296,0.0005586657,0.00008018089,0.00001863004,0.00008987039,0.0026132844,0.0003452303,0.000235483,0.93745,0.02042617,0.03805397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015512574,0.00015719098,0.0010861731,0.00071620184,0.00004241925,0.0002699163,0.0033945988,0.0036871622,0.0008959749,0.51045644,0.47902298,0.000115805924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010386461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0097588785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98961353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010427137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02024725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.371987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561714858","doi":"","title":"Conflicting Stories and Reasonable Doubt: Variations on W. (D.)'s Theme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Appeal; Supreme court; Reasonable doubt; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03375833885951644,"score_gpt":0.3309667963353046,"score_spread":0.29720845747578817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561714858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013644384,0.029195216,0.016515248,0.4911849,0.004908093,0.00013927436,0.00010646251,0.00004211684,0.4442644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6557854,0.019605428,0.008557119,0.2324592,0.009135492,0.0005209669,0.000086970016,0.00019285908,0.073656514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99202967,0.003798568,0.00035961307,0.0010924919,0.0016473506,0.0010722223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98868775,0.00934291,0.00029714577,0.00041757224,0.00083471247,0.00041996184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01308656,0.00050449005,0.00075947476,0.0018168368,0.009054151,0.010061778,0.0037284528,0.014116082,0.0040351446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016964288,0.00051978324,0.0010612726,0.0018444967,0.041186236,0.015001607,0.009274044,0.023224931,0.00051660015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040109967,0.0000047945277,0.00006404089,0.0000170876,0.0000020802468,0.00008910127,0.0034609535,0.000032428976,0.000020665448,0.983787,0.009965531,0.0025522478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001892137,0.000009724738,0.00039934195,0.00035637233,0.000009157484,0.00018847,0.0032432217,0.00032082168,0.00010511215,0.76859695,0.22672516,0.000026758173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03397422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031122832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03397422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107502695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068456256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077998996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562007790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2560006","title":"Bill C-51 Backgrounder #1: The New Advocating or Promoting Terrorism Offence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08342724735089906,"score_gpt":0.35506988928396616,"score_spread":0.2716426419330671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562007790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037955993,0.0018227253,0.0011951986,0.7064816,0.029416798,0.000361745,0.00096750073,0.00043796853,0.25552103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015527521,0.00064430654,0.0007788694,0.74527955,0.008166822,0.0002780865,0.00022913527,0.00012320693,0.2289725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98485273,0.002159297,0.0010753338,0.0021510667,0.005670038,0.004091581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97621197,0.010706764,0.0012830648,0.0018202183,0.005275612,0.0047025057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00876487,0.0012490364,0.0012801784,0.0020669498,0.010084687,0.009384843,0.003574785,0.064688735,0.04505589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04710688,0.0015672506,0.0017394307,0.0009821637,0.0049024527,0.00442606,0.004917323,0.034074426,0.024104878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034556713,0.000032273216,0.000510274,0.000048306938,0.000008724158,0.00017704995,0.0002995074,0.000033035405,0.0003092341,0.031877078,0.9607112,0.0059587485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007126415,0.00008493553,0.003836427,0.0006030699,0.00005527187,0.00035917433,0.00064863486,0.00022051217,0.0008101046,0.011928971,0.9812898,0.00009174895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03408777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09300934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99332976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066702235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01825597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15072697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568613422","doi":"","title":"Searching and Seizing after 9/11: Developing and Applying Empirical Methodology to Measure Judicial Output in the Supreme Court's Section 8 Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Judicial activism; Judicial opinion; Operationalization; Political science; Judicial review; Majority opinion; Judicial interpretation; Judicial independence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.29014840128974323,"score_gpt":0.4451319402961774,"score_spread":0.1549835390064342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568613422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694744,0.00028386453,0.014483513,0.00043864388,0.000013281802,0.00036494443,0.00029760267,0.000012122096,0.014631639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886164,0.00017118466,0.009687087,0.000100494435,0.00001057156,0.00035546528,0.0002985109,0.00000999328,0.00075026095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895782,0.005655765,0.0005720848,0.0008378651,0.0025727116,0.00078330905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595876,0.024241922,0.009065354,0.0020226883,0.004097776,0.0009847699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014594972,0.00049528544,0.0005158052,0.008983654,0.003338928,0.0053829816,0.001523193,0.0010196898,0.0011634489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046009712,0.00045004886,0.00057582825,0.010495938,0.0067753545,0.0046088304,0.0036139488,0.002240577,0.00020744391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008550605,0.00080147356,0.80608684,0.00012527827,0.00013031228,0.0002942733,0.09464987,0.004719108,0.0008298745,0.052783955,0.0010436178,0.038449865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057507492,0.00052743667,0.7973306,0.00035277163,0.00010790637,0.00015895614,0.118465565,0.03868852,0.0029795384,0.030330885,0.010811528,0.00018865388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16416706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1571743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16416706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011720461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007010039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.326423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568708948","doi":"10.3968/6550","title":"Reflections on “Not Rescuing People in Danger” From the Perspective of Criminal Law Legislation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Connotation; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Imperfect; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); China; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.33748921769039925,"score_gpt":0.5177260157062584,"score_spread":0.18023679801585918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568708948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120169055,0.0066521624,0.0020626036,0.9144074,0.0021602837,0.000025665282,0.000032660148,0.000010594464,0.06263173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6556772,0.006588186,0.0028974519,0.31423295,0.0032217298,0.00013717463,0.00003118655,0.000042659573,0.017171497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97020197,0.02005302,0.00083260355,0.0022126972,0.0041713296,0.0025283343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576088,0.03257284,0.0020657585,0.0016036598,0.004888473,0.0012604279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034787294,0.0006189449,0.00094959245,0.0018782396,0.010455816,0.011354967,0.0046810624,0.031679414,0.003754834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042352945,0.0005263549,0.0009165721,0.0014159745,0.10865656,0.021815721,0.005940436,0.033490498,0.0005450615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008471549,0.000016496348,0.00023439345,0.00006290968,0.0000047112667,0.00017280717,0.018175576,0.000072884985,0.000065820044,0.9660253,0.012779155,0.002381448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003172788,0.000065389286,0.0017099218,0.0016236249,0.000026955338,0.00031016607,0.04777994,0.00034307217,0.000587819,0.58264315,0.3648042,0.00007415196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020782165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02568469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034787294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011994336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015184534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18397498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568732596","doi":"","title":"What is Terrorism? Assessing Domestic Legal Definitions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislation; CLARITY; Political science; Principle of legality; Statutory law; Law; Notice; Scope (computer science); Law enforcement; Jurisdiction; Consistency (knowledge bases)","score_opus":0.3275889453753762,"score_gpt":0.46643166416832027,"score_spread":0.13884271879294408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568732596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47989935,0.04666255,0.05181673,0.07853973,0.0013781928,0.0008422297,0.0012215248,0.0000891831,0.33955052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96672463,0.010578404,0.016707294,0.0031096786,0.0002920483,0.00042847497,0.00086360396,0.00004964312,0.001246217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9120722,0.05358627,0.010688396,0.0033853364,0.018215636,0.0020521847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73342305,0.17492534,0.04462785,0.008804773,0.03462937,0.0035896278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05180689,0.000583512,0.0011429192,0.020949297,0.0059467666,0.0157169,0.0027577549,0.0025009532,0.0025543957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17446816,0.00044961044,0.00089649716,0.013988044,0.021393301,0.017452195,0.010580922,0.004591653,0.0004065111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004581936,0.00011078071,0.08722906,0.0018481174,0.00011376776,0.0005226947,0.09298968,0.001009086,0.00034223986,0.69657826,0.008357698,0.110852756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028277516,0.00021759757,0.09478391,0.012026825,0.00017444057,0.0017482355,0.35285708,0.0031580532,0.0019418449,0.31185213,0.22103749,0.0001741507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008273941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074047768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05180689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011399736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008317343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27398425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570709259","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1165","title":"Hislop v. Canada: A Retroactive Look","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06325346545679207,"score_gpt":0.3141698399751598,"score_spread":0.25091637451836774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570709259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17640218,0.006830354,0.0061451322,0.1320084,0.00059593,0.00033873366,0.00077539193,0.00016869389,0.67673516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87869954,0.0038701198,0.0026285106,0.052627575,0.0001709584,0.00007503924,0.00012446365,0.000038225768,0.061765533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920833,0.00067267695,0.00013179818,0.00064928544,0.0043946616,0.0020683918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567956,0.001723273,0.00024826065,0.00021847751,0.0017902167,0.00034010853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035483134,0.00035660178,0.0004757121,0.0016476248,0.010246038,0.00847365,0.003157995,0.0053402944,0.0032723837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008938973,0.0005019435,0.00062157377,0.0019127222,0.009884829,0.0026535843,0.0018316713,0.0076772985,0.00023478904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047545538,0.000022462049,0.003423163,0.0000836399,0.00002816593,0.0011882549,0.004517054,0.00061513623,0.0006769249,0.9442765,0.028132914,0.01698811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002328363,0.00030941435,0.032720383,0.001390015,0.00051982864,0.0013252192,0.026953848,0.008726359,0.009877558,0.32093057,0.5964861,0.00052791554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9411298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058870196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048274282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0924991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35025603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577588864","doi":"","title":"Troper, Michel. Le gouvernement des juges. Québec: Université Laval, 2006, 53 p","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018435474875056774,"score_gpt":0.2606443649946084,"score_spread":0.24220889011955163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577588864","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017727375,0.89967996,0.0011024495,0.03851625,0.006546933,0.000042547745,0.0038221243,0.00019948927,0.048317447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0518625,0.5527635,0.0023602291,0.0055390378,0.0030125713,0.00014902966,0.002081097,0.0005909422,0.38164103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989034,0.00019184785,0.000110856534,0.00012652042,0.00048986025,0.00017744514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684995,0.00076551375,0.00015064748,0.0001199114,0.0018628908,0.00025108695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015674238,0.002674673,0.0014160196,0.008132843,0.008646838,0.0065146675,0.002893359,0.004318305,0.047158394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004369191,0.0018777819,0.0008965574,0.020434566,0.0042760596,0.007560321,0.0014072412,0.0035761015,0.012531183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049041977,0.000020303532,0.0014614438,0.00045838996,0.00002476237,0.00014173253,0.0029362538,0.00023936543,0.00015991057,0.0065219845,0.8730349,0.114952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014943544,0.0000111448735,0.018538682,0.0017206749,0.00004098596,0.00016628897,0.0046388116,0.00014507178,0.0002484352,0.0015454271,0.9728919,0.00003768113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95636517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98495495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95636517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027855797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02373188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20210892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579547169","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009947","title":"Constance Backhouse Carnal Crimes: Sexual Assault Law in Canada, 1900–1975. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2008, 442 p.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sexual assault; Sociology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.020380505510634583,"score_gpt":0.2780890863079728,"score_spread":0.2577085807973382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579547169","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011882016,0.6658353,0.0006263751,0.1181298,0.0027956525,0.0001441908,0.02673962,0.00018073317,0.17366627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1953368,0.437539,0.001405967,0.014082111,0.0010315683,0.00019465665,0.01032262,0.0001607889,0.33992645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851197,0.000086871754,0.00008864996,0.00011322068,0.00082826795,0.00037099316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666154,0.00047153202,0.00030002027,0.000060408955,0.0019456366,0.0005608397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011465187,0.0009442659,0.0004912702,0.0057479516,0.0072217165,0.0044252677,0.002431704,0.0028920674,0.015876295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055530127,0.0009240153,0.00034994134,0.0130816465,0.0035067212,0.0029238432,0.0012499624,0.0029312996,0.0018888876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017583103,0.000013031683,0.0039841468,0.00023483139,0.000011759545,0.00013618465,0.003365218,0.00021135641,0.00003798939,0.017654005,0.93743885,0.036895003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009256072,0.000007979888,0.095291875,0.0016258818,0.000039783667,0.00014880575,0.01101242,0.00017784121,0.00016329248,0.003532711,0.8879195,0.00007059074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99630094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99898607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115738936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115738936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13567998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8397487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579678595","doi":"","title":"Prescribing Greater Protection for Rights : Administrative Law and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Right to property; Business","score_opus":0.05996083192953211,"score_gpt":0.2860038829731233,"score_spread":0.22604305104359118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579678595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022019124,0.0073410342,0.004250944,0.6030074,0.004281648,0.00038891975,0.0010796766,0.00022100928,0.35741028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47543573,0.0072327503,0.021101385,0.36972982,0.0025913767,0.0004535436,0.000880556,0.00037763003,0.122197285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92947215,0.009747827,0.0039283573,0.0051256334,0.036229663,0.0154964235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8932578,0.03665307,0.005305174,0.005531177,0.04312119,0.016131597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03896907,0.00084928004,0.0012590117,0.004582156,0.019246032,0.017085245,0.0067332187,0.020528086,0.016876515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14089346,0.0015367416,0.0019481027,0.0044613155,0.01983246,0.007566749,0.007447111,0.024316056,0.0012564474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077932884,0.000097718985,0.004259421,0.00030852229,0.00004317643,0.00018251121,0.00625573,0.0004801148,0.00065111235,0.6264187,0.31735805,0.043866966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025464882,0.0001141376,0.048081484,0.002833921,0.00020752777,0.0003113023,0.0072262846,0.00088856556,0.0013034097,0.116818994,0.8213925,0.00056726305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12644479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12644479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5091232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91742545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579768026","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - a proposed alternative admissibility framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.13898011366843635,"score_gpt":0.38690226068965083,"score_spread":0.24792214702121448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579768026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16039929,0.021431813,0.15717036,0.18206212,0.0010216008,0.0017748417,0.0005360396,0.00016500596,0.47543892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87294173,0.0032264453,0.10615009,0.010363577,0.00033049166,0.000370885,0.00007433797,0.000033818724,0.0065086326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8695934,0.058717523,0.010052338,0.0056086504,0.044788055,0.011240031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88522464,0.07400396,0.007634308,0.0049129357,0.025522504,0.002701603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10353573,0.0012587209,0.0017349719,0.020444352,0.020300217,0.032907903,0.0078122877,0.012945655,0.0026173946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17683196,0.0017054375,0.0023570678,0.0111740315,0.048666842,0.013803736,0.011872372,0.011348139,0.00031137516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046427536,0.000019611618,0.0031342222,0.00021014937,0.000059808604,0.0004443882,0.0077123623,0.0011077933,0.00030600882,0.9643241,0.0013112072,0.021323912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002217071,0.00039123758,0.019134384,0.004100176,0.0007707714,0.0014853013,0.027122337,0.010035695,0.003132787,0.84276235,0.09029983,0.0005435369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5188369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75621414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058834314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14553659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582194580","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1127","title":"Expanding Victims’ Rights in the Charter Era and Beyond","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Substantive rights; Criminal justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.05504296271259491,"score_gpt":0.3383533561587946,"score_spread":0.2833103934461997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582194580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13303322,0.020102048,0.02445076,0.29822123,0.0037034822,0.00014076936,0.00010533158,0.00030099467,0.51994205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908102,0.0068621673,0.005840362,0.032983966,0.0025940076,0.00009421714,0.00005757912,0.00012221534,0.06063542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864617,0.0054159258,0.00034470577,0.0010987397,0.0037091433,0.0029697348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901513,0.004190293,0.001202052,0.0016822522,0.0015930182,0.0011811614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138134705,0.0003408795,0.00052625383,0.0017721149,0.011197729,0.013362534,0.002049096,0.0068334625,0.0074221557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016032148,0.00036542973,0.00072446355,0.001495493,0.03100952,0.013734419,0.010125942,0.0067846575,0.00053406635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013749034,0.000024446806,0.0005794694,0.000029286075,0.0000027295607,0.0001438114,0.012578794,0.00017317495,0.00018525016,0.9477802,0.008530342,0.029958783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022779956,0.00010868611,0.002669104,0.000422169,0.000014400526,0.00036934338,0.012111389,0.00030511673,0.0008166734,0.13463561,0.8484374,0.000087257235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05023202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06610442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015893603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025363564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11531669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582799247","doi":"","title":"The Sub Judice Convention: What to Do When a Matter Is 'Before the Courts'","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Parliament; Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027677521366686966,"score_gpt":0.320981256585466,"score_spread":0.29330373521877906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582799247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006665335,0.12908588,0.022960464,0.75282246,0.013275039,0.00021071604,0.00019443847,0.00013027119,0.07465537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28290266,0.08046989,0.05380822,0.5283705,0.012588172,0.0005647319,0.00031603122,0.00031914262,0.040660623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94999015,0.022415329,0.0042125005,0.0034360683,0.016338812,0.0036071965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522494,0.025634918,0.0039834264,0.0034417345,0.012378072,0.0023123377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048735783,0.0007942875,0.0024311405,0.0040689376,0.008774923,0.011572568,0.003549047,0.014393244,0.0028763397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106727615,0.00073816185,0.0009766867,0.0032770983,0.024997056,0.02245824,0.003836735,0.013534849,0.0017222769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007646319,0.000060053862,0.0024523297,0.0021547752,0.00008870173,0.00025523634,0.008174229,0.00027368712,0.0017351222,0.683279,0.15250176,0.14894861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048229238,0.000083966785,0.004018567,0.0037745812,0.000115204326,0.00028775234,0.005198622,0.00030286342,0.0014672284,0.38271812,0.60183394,0.00015090976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09512194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12758967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013493668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04904312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25774252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583043871","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1152","title":"The Shaky Foundation of “Statutory Platforms”: A Comment on Baier v. Alberta","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Legislation; Charter; Law; Political science; Obligation; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.0787740438001787,"score_gpt":0.347654343789321,"score_spread":0.26888029998914226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583043871","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018002043,0.0070063034,0.0020916737,0.7202988,0.00497158,0.00010336259,0.00043515777,0.00020486552,0.24688625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21655476,0.0023258578,0.0016519916,0.6762039,0.0025785181,0.00014608941,0.00017901913,0.00019510667,0.10016471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806107,0.0027181406,0.0004498449,0.0023047514,0.008091484,0.005825138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887916,0.0065197316,0.00035408358,0.00042230755,0.0025054996,0.0014068055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012551225,0.0010138096,0.0011815559,0.0014747446,0.033583578,0.015834218,0.010495368,0.049262453,0.005315946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019576978,0.0018749037,0.0018626038,0.0024753239,0.029281775,0.0058420594,0.00501392,0.05100797,0.0011491659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063500374,0.000023956505,0.00085613044,0.00006382397,0.000018949746,0.00070498296,0.012674236,0.00036608387,0.00039426456,0.6605464,0.3192433,0.0050443774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020262049,0.0000612944,0.0059386566,0.00080885814,0.00012023176,0.00032269905,0.01370929,0.0014140208,0.00089554343,0.091561526,0.88456756,0.0003977724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95513135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9696586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06982067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06982067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11389704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5065868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583143683","doi":"","title":"The Consequences of Compelled Self-Incrimination in Terrorism Investigations: A Comparison of American Grand Juries and Canadian Investigative Hearings","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Witness; Jurisdiction; Interrogation; Contempt; Terrorism; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0347785693407037,"score_gpt":0.31353073315822033,"score_spread":0.27875216381751666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583143683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73549473,0.007696657,0.0007798315,0.011121483,0.00030929002,0.00016209895,0.0007163913,0.000054607244,0.24366482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937654,0.0037364766,0.00038532252,0.0012378137,0.000047646412,0.000029494518,0.00028341636,0.000018923212,0.004884365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770419,0.00298568,0.0007676678,0.0008170008,0.01306438,0.0053234263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96590704,0.011284757,0.0036486143,0.0010307675,0.014578557,0.0035503614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009635659,0.0004646595,0.00063936634,0.009182998,0.012283008,0.008847313,0.0023401668,0.0020159713,0.0044941963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06275372,0.0005328668,0.00069645036,0.010426359,0.005777912,0.0016379436,0.0043045986,0.0024683047,0.00029860088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022201221,0.0004728414,0.29741362,0.0012743498,0.0005875183,0.0030896964,0.14671162,0.0038189446,0.0027792396,0.16295278,0.048998464,0.32968083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015924661,0.00026834046,0.7322325,0.0010999602,0.0006276889,0.0009969843,0.118362136,0.0012050495,0.001707593,0.0041927723,0.13868491,0.0004628045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98415405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063988164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063988164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0931427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4642688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585666025","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1120","title":"Rewriting the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Four Suggestions Designed to Promote a Fairer Trial and Evidentiary Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jury; Law; Political science; Jury trial; Substantive due process; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.06931021079766578,"score_gpt":0.33675570795127946,"score_spread":0.26744549715361365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585666025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020743564,0.012716643,0.11340557,0.45907125,0.020371035,0.004219079,0.0009945817,0.0011983465,0.36727998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2559697,0.0102107255,0.3163557,0.14952078,0.004041788,0.0016830429,0.00064964633,0.0006896683,0.26087904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9507161,0.008576769,0.0025650316,0.004181804,0.026502956,0.0074573886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96204346,0.010111279,0.0014566171,0.0031227851,0.02025383,0.0030120187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03725683,0.0013523811,0.0011532684,0.005067871,0.017701782,0.025241684,0.007154912,0.018055795,0.004858759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06227205,0.0013491111,0.0022818376,0.0045358753,0.024933401,0.0091108335,0.005654485,0.020560397,0.0015258837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003586978,0.000042749718,0.00041313574,0.00014628933,0.000009202901,0.00036687942,0.0039843135,0.0011722721,0.00082817074,0.8987134,0.06948256,0.024805231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001894938,0.00010864957,0.0027470875,0.00062439044,0.00009130105,0.00023430356,0.0030230042,0.003239451,0.0023749983,0.12120604,0.86556613,0.0005952463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89394534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9207043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10605466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08764462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24748938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6359092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587873341","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Common Law Procedural Traditions, Edited by Paul Roberts and Jill Hunter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.01917383262053442,"score_gpt":0.31156649625010074,"score_spread":0.29239266362956634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587873341","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014568953,0.8821901,0.0012705564,0.041757435,0.03544515,0.000049702423,0.00036777445,0.00009880972,0.03867469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002367891,0.85973763,0.0018598759,0.02280852,0.027271988,0.00009921475,0.0004678167,0.00016209243,0.08522497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783367,0.0005440465,0.00011272503,0.00016439417,0.0012650052,0.00008011542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919206,0.005059091,0.0003770595,0.00019269044,0.0021847966,0.00026571733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020616767,0.0011411785,0.001737337,0.006268963,0.0010832147,0.005399827,0.0015058159,0.0024395694,0.020274865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008907161,0.0007273316,0.0006646744,0.009902569,0.0024729113,0.004071091,0.0014303984,0.0041481974,0.0108141275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052135233,0.000006333978,0.000037336147,0.00069538475,0.000010034802,0.000019657964,0.0000737482,0.00007279176,0.00005574435,0.006111492,0.9550211,0.037891105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004351806,0.000009022854,0.00022886765,0.0014792549,0.000011554414,0.00009937903,0.000088738714,0.00003332748,0.000034577322,0.0033724196,0.9946278,0.000010854244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013718539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044126477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020274865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004134451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008328946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06782621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588053002","doi":"","title":"Law & Politics after September 11th: Civil Rights & the Rule of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Civil liberties; Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Rule of law; Deference; Terrorism; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.014189679959716756,"score_gpt":0.28900539590299984,"score_spread":0.2748157159432831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588053002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012166016,0.028091932,0.00066652236,0.3138766,0.022477644,0.00008874194,0.0009004997,0.00010530358,0.62162673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1411718,0.0060585355,0.00027766963,0.110042565,0.0059351344,0.00009892442,0.00039622147,0.00010063781,0.73591846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670655,0.0005917312,0.00012273548,0.00047955784,0.0010688128,0.0010306741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981725,0.00071456167,0.00016905094,0.000165242,0.00046207279,0.00031651594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024593929,0.00041113063,0.00041932418,0.00091392075,0.010446284,0.013389932,0.001010133,0.016113726,0.035880364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008012972,0.00039823266,0.0005682211,0.0013302262,0.006671061,0.0043472997,0.002969029,0.013962182,0.008824365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004759983,0.00004947528,0.0011997684,0.00008237716,0.000012744178,0.0007734125,0.0029796818,0.00007249226,0.00018238739,0.3238833,0.6542626,0.01645419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148906565,0.000023748817,0.004598453,0.00030813096,0.000008192951,0.00011691339,0.0014427635,0.000042290038,0.00022819648,0.016097914,0.97709227,0.000026224694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08054385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12265417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08054385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052473424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16015005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589522395","doi":"","title":"Death, Dissent, and Diplomacy: The U.S. Death Penalty as an Obstacle to Foreign Relations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Battle; Appeal; Dissent; Diplomacy; Political science; History; Politics; Ancient history","score_opus":0.0372630089398062,"score_gpt":0.33443674182640937,"score_spread":0.29717373288660315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589522395","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036986538,0.15090965,0.00027488574,0.50369185,0.20497888,0.00003379376,0.00007764753,0.00007933544,0.13625532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1573835,0.111470066,0.00046711665,0.23004222,0.37062106,0.0001076637,0.0000908864,0.00023134517,0.12958619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974542,0.0011421546,0.00014163544,0.00031197246,0.0005424923,0.0004075568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99144757,0.0064997645,0.0003727743,0.00014553485,0.0006537471,0.0008806548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003839327,0.00094146625,0.00060785,0.0013156991,0.011724329,0.015445398,0.0014302561,0.01934691,0.008664092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01114311,0.0005525129,0.0005343721,0.0010557193,0.0074414415,0.0066450965,0.0024397934,0.01947905,0.0020063892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016369064,0.000019049352,0.00014830664,0.000086017426,0.0000039373067,0.00037339705,0.0008715892,0.000048481896,0.000037116104,0.028462712,0.9584873,0.01144569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000298869,0.000053750013,0.0014016951,0.001372329,0.000024423682,0.00029135094,0.005300736,0.00024173937,0.00010925951,0.021128554,0.9699949,0.00005135004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010636763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038893055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01934691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047216755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065869535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034258306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590093714","doi":"","title":"Introduction: The McLachlin Court's First Decade - A Dynamic Time for Public Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.02747134308158231,"score_gpt":0.2854753863027534,"score_spread":0.25800404322117104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590093714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021928332,0.1416581,0.001718338,0.11645506,0.036520425,0.00015042927,0.0076886476,0.00041575157,0.69320035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040801723,0.09830084,0.0020593344,0.027923524,0.01590129,0.00015714788,0.0052380753,0.00049710507,0.809121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994235,0.00006207869,0.000016462727,0.00008798322,0.00030807607,0.00010189749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987669,0.0002516941,0.000057300713,0.00004488873,0.00063515274,0.00024404099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045649929,0.00055969093,0.00045906843,0.0021308174,0.004548477,0.0068912404,0.00089444127,0.0019317312,0.048755147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020760323,0.00038176894,0.0002999396,0.003081327,0.001954343,0.0026131768,0.0013809977,0.0036407178,0.009350191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058609644,0.000006632779,0.00013090145,0.00009236535,9.251001e-7,0.000032896933,0.0006888881,0.0000416992,0.00005129079,0.037122276,0.9464154,0.015410803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.618152e-7,0.0000021695805,0.0005482845,0.0002620505,7.800173e-7,0.000025718267,0.00040392278,0.000014908799,0.000017790786,0.0023000115,0.99641955,0.0000038999156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35253885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49190232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6474612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017801771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014664695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7009737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594900901","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1140","title":"Justice Bertha Wilson: A Classically Liberal Judge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Economic Justice; Classical liberalism; Law; Dissenting opinion; Sociology; State (computer science); Law and economics; Feminism; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.12039602237513411,"score_gpt":0.37005412232146506,"score_spread":0.24965809994633095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594900901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03274262,0.010167706,0.024622867,0.36308268,0.0085600335,0.00010808189,0.00007419963,0.00018002391,0.56046176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6402815,0.0021460878,0.010167251,0.15236573,0.0028947566,0.00011723751,0.00003153865,0.00016424188,0.19183177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898902,0.0035260662,0.00027410072,0.0016053203,0.003301426,0.001402845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942761,0.0034106672,0.00026525228,0.00029390195,0.0013101676,0.0004438354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053657615,0.00045747156,0.00045358177,0.0011311705,0.011346679,0.008517152,0.0013003733,0.0100393,0.0028540837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01761197,0.0005012595,0.00044394578,0.0007810653,0.018521115,0.006982448,0.0026903744,0.011839953,0.00091185403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121339235,0.000011341859,0.0001432844,0.000018407653,0.0000040528325,0.00017702898,0.0026541476,0.00012436138,0.00016828565,0.94198453,0.048483964,0.0062185824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016463813,0.000033487097,0.0003107559,0.00012546881,0.000011990102,0.00022882868,0.0023791923,0.00064656837,0.00071004505,0.48188096,0.5135813,0.00007495629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03264738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05147968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008262102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009033822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0649147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596973577","doi":"","title":"The Standard of Proof for Jurisdiction Clauses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Civil procedure; Standard of review; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Judicial review; Psychology","score_opus":0.018257362630048526,"score_gpt":0.339793371975986,"score_spread":0.3215360093459375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596973577","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017226448,0.006545903,0.7758896,0.04999861,0.002783467,0.00072396855,0.00046796826,0.00037088632,0.14599322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5479759,0.0037984296,0.41297,0.015644627,0.005376572,0.0020944877,0.00041511178,0.00033950462,0.011385356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86462,0.054208938,0.016488958,0.013138685,0.04683967,0.00470378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78372395,0.13582036,0.011867432,0.032042142,0.033668622,0.0028775674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.105682634,0.0011802297,0.0027823031,0.005779523,0.007916773,0.019789606,0.008421164,0.01758858,0.006431371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.276955,0.0018300818,0.0033142949,0.0034559222,0.032336537,0.030681035,0.008802481,0.020310964,0.002847902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066975244,0.000006772428,0.00006324085,0.00003927695,0.0000071729614,0.000023191818,0.00016361746,0.00018068984,0.00011774128,0.9960824,0.00091248605,0.0023967987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029104493,0.000028812803,0.00014634944,0.00015641715,0.000019795689,0.000103766615,0.00008441035,0.0011003229,0.00043675775,0.9834974,0.014363903,0.000032976157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029539608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012872994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105682634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071443515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013830539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5589099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597958332","doi":"","title":"A Brief History of the Fifth Amendment Guarantee Against Double Jeopardy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Law; Conviction; Supreme court; Convict; Jurisprudence; Verdict; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Equal Protection Clause; Constitutional right; State (computer science); Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.05414645466410535,"score_gpt":0.303914890383577,"score_spread":0.24976843571947166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597958332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026204367,0.11645222,0.010258966,0.047872335,0.009396634,0.00029044412,0.00066254457,0.00033739666,0.81210893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15736318,0.24623346,0.018047335,0.16414683,0.032081597,0.0016423449,0.0018221436,0.0009297194,0.37773344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924751,0.0022706788,0.0007370195,0.0010201639,0.0027455755,0.0007515165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98924553,0.00811409,0.00045583662,0.00074166094,0.0011934016,0.00024956273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008143841,0.0010455273,0.0008509,0.0043531694,0.0048831343,0.009224811,0.002845847,0.012710357,0.029020926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023880647,0.0008833985,0.0014039751,0.0050616525,0.010657401,0.010564894,0.003839794,0.017239505,0.009027968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031862124,0.00006216197,0.00024589238,0.00033625134,0.000009654659,0.00025268205,0.00075147377,0.00033425947,0.00020374836,0.8578149,0.07674108,0.06321607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010553716,0.00005124451,0.0005184049,0.0012570668,0.000011640651,0.00014406626,0.00012509926,0.000152754,0.00024396826,0.07148213,0.9259657,0.00003739259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024434026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011115664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029020926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009640119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075064097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0970847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598155893","doi":"10.71781/1652","title":"L'émergence des limites à la liberté de tester en droit québécois : étude socio-juridique de la production du droit","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006994411420983061,"score_gpt":0.22078197470474828,"score_spread":0.21378756328376522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598155893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431296,0.0009469385,0.0008739919,0.0036048563,0.00003538709,0.000040123614,0.0003819696,0.000022251857,0.050964836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97202873,0.00036673128,0.00024344753,0.0001992547,0.000004474073,0.000019444315,0.00011376852,0.000012354186,0.02701172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986526,0.00021922727,0.00002568222,0.00018181444,0.0003971806,0.0005234406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955955,0.00076745317,0.00050797756,0.00014538362,0.0016160515,0.0013676673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017269307,0.000258271,0.0002684749,0.001460153,0.008171527,0.0045217173,0.0014661639,0.0009349621,0.015621291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035854676,0.00033586478,0.0002104787,0.0019047518,0.0046968516,0.0015024665,0.0020192934,0.0018878198,0.00057697896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022427697,0.00019166422,0.32155964,0.0002143654,0.0000572973,0.00194998,0.4206502,0.0010216492,0.004475155,0.13147375,0.01959993,0.09858213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023243485,0.00010697745,0.60425043,0.00036104894,0.00003402258,0.000313294,0.2531142,0.0017038843,0.0007433047,0.0028156033,0.13638754,0.00014648952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9827382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99228656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0503444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0503444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04548807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36527592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599651875","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1141","title":"Justice Wilson’s Administrative Law Legacy: The National Corn Growers Decision and Judicial Review of Administrative Decision-Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Tribunal; Law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Judicial restraint; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Deference; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial activism; Judicial deference","score_opus":0.17938520276895004,"score_gpt":0.4461744946053336,"score_spread":0.26678929183638356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599651875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027157644,0.017589025,0.0058199237,0.77298045,0.0039874064,0.00008260198,0.00009526935,0.000060821556,0.17222682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59937626,0.009564062,0.0069969236,0.3314056,0.005277381,0.00012640409,0.00006051046,0.00009565844,0.047097143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9476456,0.01437269,0.0021867414,0.00607158,0.020065367,0.009658022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460473,0.03267333,0.0024057264,0.0016362206,0.013944491,0.00329287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0258956,0.00050484244,0.00072037964,0.0031821006,0.02711184,0.027151057,0.0041506486,0.019685088,0.001614763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06756688,0.000898387,0.00089195586,0.003510007,0.057674102,0.00727282,0.0037665104,0.019359428,0.0002845033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019864012,0.00002267205,0.0010527206,0.00006209704,0.000026147183,0.0004647069,0.00948291,0.00040207754,0.00020113954,0.88402176,0.08936365,0.014880162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007388344,0.00004645983,0.005473474,0.00062101864,0.00009565395,0.00041319925,0.012768318,0.0013379359,0.0010416736,0.24009152,0.73771715,0.00031977711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78947437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8832169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78947437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08359065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13671394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60649544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600112519","doi":"","title":"Terrorism Offences and the Charter: A Comment on R. v. Khawaja","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Politics; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01707341892154092,"score_gpt":0.30741818598590526,"score_spread":0.29034476706436435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600112519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014300935,0.0073209642,0.000749155,0.88505536,0.011531997,0.0001423885,0.00076834933,0.00021006844,0.079920724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08078467,0.002887437,0.0007552743,0.8191436,0.0064915963,0.00015161715,0.00018163303,0.00013457757,0.089469634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089676,0.0012951494,0.00066178787,0.0013618029,0.002737604,0.0030469573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883851,0.0076906597,0.0006866668,0.00045954215,0.0019275282,0.00085056835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077018873,0.0010876625,0.0015818472,0.0010050151,0.020333901,0.011564182,0.007725692,0.07812548,0.005808879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018029386,0.0019356395,0.0025033406,0.0015812072,0.014649985,0.003945062,0.0026697959,0.05009758,0.0027051049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017719965,0.000056956684,0.0013583959,0.00018061689,0.000044824752,0.0017264633,0.0087259235,0.00048644768,0.001113148,0.17628114,0.8040398,0.0058091693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002085957,0.000084203806,0.0070253774,0.0005800379,0.00013917644,0.00028416506,0.005149136,0.0006934542,0.0008849787,0.015888145,0.96868193,0.0003808846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81112605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8831853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81112605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04301436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040444437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37997252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603695401","doi":"","title":"Conflicts Research on Overseas Forensics of Civil and Commercial Matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Convention; Law; Business","score_opus":0.13401910218218327,"score_gpt":0.4109650608676636,"score_spread":0.27694595868548033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603695401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182911,0.07169635,0.010571287,0.023299126,0.00069089123,0.000252809,0.00043475095,0.00002899289,0.17473462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96359485,0.024347993,0.002430838,0.0010676864,0.00028402172,0.000056626228,0.00024610708,0.000010969636,0.007960828],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922282,0.0032757004,0.00060151686,0.0009032125,0.0022856575,0.0007056829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701886,0.01444061,0.0070586884,0.0017305932,0.0051931785,0.0013883556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007869075,0.00040294667,0.0005187347,0.008555216,0.0051271063,0.005288538,0.0013288719,0.001113516,0.005896142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022544874,0.00024541345,0.00040840058,0.012153911,0.0048741177,0.008866397,0.0025933255,0.001955293,0.00024838446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010985412,0.0002346428,0.14810774,0.0017571846,0.000152939,0.0011865284,0.08009094,0.00074790604,0.001106749,0.32047984,0.010884232,0.43514144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023280387,0.00023547535,0.34252906,0.004368188,0.00030448442,0.0043441304,0.26063764,0.0040555554,0.0041295104,0.10335743,0.27587318,0.00014204136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018530743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01940757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018530743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063637695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008022335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04617256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604669359","doi":"10.71781/2394","title":"L'obligation d'information à échelle d'intensité variable: vers une théorisation de l'obligation de conseil","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Business; Supreme court; Political science; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","score_opus":0.008433672464596347,"score_gpt":0.19654621901297561,"score_spread":0.18811254654837928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604669359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0746804,0.006560065,0.091454886,0.06443755,0.00024458845,0.00012509774,0.00032079368,0.00015190174,0.7620246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92296356,0.0024994605,0.01009962,0.0030506586,0.00019890412,0.000117284406,0.000082474326,0.00010291845,0.06088511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925909,0.0022575946,0.00023051127,0.0010883583,0.002851145,0.0009814885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903656,0.004839772,0.00071202544,0.0008586951,0.00264401,0.00057986326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00634061,0.0005497987,0.0005117038,0.0023266189,0.0059349616,0.00971214,0.001994967,0.004405696,0.0119893635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011989782,0.0005845131,0.0008634787,0.0026323937,0.024789235,0.012368154,0.0046363436,0.0043667564,0.00088530715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005400423,0.000005146681,0.0003028693,0.0000178228,0.0000027071515,0.00004012291,0.0032217172,0.00025989744,0.00006158623,0.9926428,0.0009346815,0.0025053218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023595607,0.000023468318,0.003112546,0.00029578424,0.000025540785,0.00016747188,0.0040023685,0.003738653,0.00041609738,0.7896778,0.19846755,0.00004909616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28823635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19239478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28823635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036741424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019750487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57311726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604749233","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1236","title":"Arbitrary Disproportionality: A New Charter Standard for Measuring the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Sentences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Jurisprudence; Constitutionality; Hearsay; Law; Sentence; Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11462601037613666,"score_gpt":0.3716684552670683,"score_spread":0.25704244489093164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604749233","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08283862,0.003334149,0.6395517,0.0056654485,0.0015874291,0.0020536906,0.0032412102,0.0010131352,0.26071468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63361764,0.0009856425,0.3449552,0.0032750377,0.00092272257,0.004626547,0.0018795592,0.0005102359,0.009227358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85672915,0.064618945,0.013523831,0.009859659,0.051942114,0.0033261832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84479564,0.09185355,0.018964382,0.020501336,0.020840876,0.0030440697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059399337,0.0007781509,0.0011557582,0.016199838,0.004593345,0.008524181,0.0037910722,0.004214133,0.0064433017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20729259,0.0006576399,0.0018510505,0.007398362,0.010436351,0.01290642,0.009738509,0.0072912546,0.0015307902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018054192,0.00013097365,0.012865347,0.00024092454,0.00006704367,0.00018828361,0.0033430166,0.0012469473,0.0032502955,0.90246314,0.01191966,0.06410391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013241004,0.0008886407,0.036999784,0.0010932668,0.00019204516,0.0013826442,0.0025558718,0.011647346,0.012989304,0.77403486,0.15754727,0.00053662393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022008722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034159836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059399337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038912687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006748687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31413746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604866233","doi":"","title":"Chapter 9, Canada - Electronic Evidence in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Digital evidence; Computer security; Electronic signature; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Digital forensics; Geography","score_opus":0.027419474247809144,"score_gpt":0.2788139767553629,"score_spread":0.25139450250755374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604866233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050579677,0.09050872,0.003028631,0.12683928,0.0061409734,0.00041156064,0.0028277016,0.00020491617,0.76498026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08778079,0.081841186,0.007261477,0.054067332,0.0012673457,0.0002035804,0.0016026957,0.00020091985,0.76577467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992677,0.00047385087,0.0003137917,0.0005558758,0.00439517,0.0015843223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912271,0.0011290361,0.00024820253,0.00020334311,0.0056064012,0.001585901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040200013,0.00054101675,0.00058636814,0.0036077262,0.018467458,0.017463753,0.0026519268,0.007946,0.038944308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010443549,0.0010015005,0.00072036247,0.00629625,0.005607236,0.003902895,0.003057087,0.0058047553,0.0043959892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018666515,0.00003268966,0.0014102486,0.00040193996,0.000011886292,0.00049071613,0.0016767476,0.0004994266,0.0003349797,0.4165969,0.5287034,0.049822353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040475475,0.000004918108,0.0016615263,0.00038946426,0.0000057097213,0.000063332045,0.000717895,0.000074774354,0.000098932745,0.003882781,0.9930767,0.000020014213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98949045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99510974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15720728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15720728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35410205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606825656","doi":"","title":"Can There Be Too Much Context In Administrative Law? Setting the Standard of Review in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Supreme court; Standard of review; Legislature; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Categorical variable; Administrative law; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09236820952006088,"score_gpt":0.4289437835473409,"score_spread":0.33657557402728006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606825656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087926775,0.046939265,0.021942358,0.6072994,0.0035595165,0.00041739584,0.0003047692,0.00017324087,0.23143736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329106,0.008469062,0.0143083725,0.035863884,0.0009321577,0.00023693034,0.000074099225,0.00009938369,0.0071055423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90562373,0.039807312,0.004258208,0.0077034733,0.029705046,0.012902225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88883716,0.052913085,0.007588776,0.004614763,0.032673877,0.013372362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05852164,0.0006227253,0.0015754108,0.0076336153,0.042725865,0.03882576,0.0052422844,0.008467966,0.003937389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15300733,0.0018324667,0.0010674512,0.007863888,0.07112862,0.016006548,0.012360618,0.014263043,0.0005335944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049672402,0.00003260147,0.00563713,0.00038049993,0.000043345164,0.00043514336,0.029470704,0.00072723604,0.00044708658,0.90022606,0.021415107,0.04113538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012523412,0.00010142764,0.036339525,0.0045862747,0.00015715287,0.00036814885,0.05181134,0.0012378991,0.0007034856,0.45340973,0.45057714,0.00058266585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8799944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9461838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82601875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17398123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2737547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607008568","doi":"","title":"The Sacred Fire: The Legacy of Antonio Lamer (Chief Justice of Canada)/Le Feu Sacré : L’Héritage D’Antonio Lamer, Juge En Chef Du Canada (French)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.007044087770493533,"score_gpt":0.23539502441093266,"score_spread":0.22835093664043912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607008568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006139438,0.28773016,0.0006442337,0.36516958,0.010303285,0.00004648929,0.00044855985,0.000101872705,0.3294164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13372771,0.12476876,0.0010714559,0.0603431,0.0044702855,0.000055833,0.0002932482,0.00020087913,0.67506874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977189,0.00031948593,0.000035501347,0.00023222578,0.0010471104,0.0006467711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980622,0.0002926052,0.00007287222,0.000049058235,0.0010511293,0.00047218116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015309324,0.0006049215,0.0005092723,0.0015201559,0.024699895,0.012364263,0.0013466772,0.0038394805,0.014836506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002719658,0.00047942472,0.0003376738,0.0031638173,0.010923635,0.0026512886,0.001657123,0.0054355515,0.0021274285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011632299,0.00001080552,0.0005613306,0.00007925231,0.0000042464276,0.0001141255,0.004449047,0.00007211444,0.00007194703,0.052655965,0.9192352,0.022734407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018816158,0.0000030828362,0.001113013,0.00016822263,0.0000033751105,0.000062386905,0.00406811,0.000026252483,0.00004180302,0.0020824452,0.9924172,0.000012128095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9545677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08447076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08447076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095256515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61288106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608382484","doi":"","title":"L'autonomie du droit de la consommation","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008303390300457765,"score_gpt":0.20983722850112543,"score_spread":0.20153383820066767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608382484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121040195,0.004905162,0.08897855,0.012217449,0.00035878184,0.00013034207,0.0002778629,0.0001421569,0.77194947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91244155,0.00353614,0.014313265,0.0013389897,0.00024383848,0.00020251758,0.00018676269,0.00012631874,0.06761068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943271,0.0021097865,0.00026212068,0.0010807798,0.0016069461,0.00061321916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924279,0.0032457775,0.001206827,0.0011374453,0.001464511,0.00051756424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004231288,0.0004396122,0.0003814181,0.00162464,0.0035072446,0.009099932,0.0012257572,0.0019127731,0.011677034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074894577,0.00034045416,0.0006139518,0.0018789198,0.015517249,0.006817708,0.004422804,0.0038962807,0.0013781998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014722498,0.000008217124,0.0014551247,0.00007934368,0.000011154344,0.000059766742,0.0067852535,0.0003822599,0.00044657625,0.97683436,0.00088907545,0.013034067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033518514,0.00014457016,0.027340045,0.0013619873,0.00006761769,0.0007215058,0.0232356,0.0022002722,0.0019369377,0.4853249,0.45750615,0.00012676964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012736144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013396901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012736144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005304289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071501005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039063573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623190492","doi":"","title":"IMPAIRED EXCLUSION: EXPLORING THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW BRIGHT LINE RULE OF GOOD FAITH IN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Good faith; Economic Justice; Faith; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.1319890253518243,"score_gpt":0.35276777740927345,"score_spread":0.22077875205744915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623190492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38475874,0.026586547,0.017438969,0.12698326,0.0005168513,0.00022608868,0.00010764348,0.000021001344,0.4433609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893963,0.0024869752,0.0015379913,0.0037509038,0.00015381168,0.000049134633,0.000013860303,0.0000055531614,0.002605505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371284,0.00395158,0.00015545519,0.00048506857,0.00086588605,0.0008291714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625682,0.03210627,0.0021288127,0.00077893806,0.0016853084,0.00073243683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013445493,0.00024479465,0.0006700615,0.0018782145,0.0042784503,0.00861251,0.0028291913,0.0063655726,0.0048373365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03908906,0.00034775533,0.00064905704,0.0014093542,0.03339368,0.009433429,0.004215876,0.006686666,0.00025050805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012841908,0.00012841234,0.005112379,0.0001418895,0.000017918774,0.0008744502,0.006343204,0.0005694556,0.00006535259,0.9639607,0.0016860645,0.02097176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009565675,0.00024070108,0.013026544,0.00083610887,0.00009075543,0.000506584,0.02267906,0.004230154,0.00016177932,0.9328071,0.025278538,0.00004702792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03229664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06876362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03229664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007559484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009327594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07110745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163065817","doi":"","title":"Chatterjee v. Ontario: Property, Crime and Civil Proceedings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Chatterjee; Constitutionality; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Ultra vires; Political science","score_opus":0.01769299269155882,"score_gpt":0.2755887227359524,"score_spread":0.2578957300443936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163065817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16071102,0.03864117,0.00091954437,0.03897041,0.00025663522,0.00013953213,0.0016283469,0.000027609072,0.75870574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93132,0.017501965,0.0007091087,0.0069754967,0.00014456596,0.000070769165,0.00030923053,0.00002012901,0.042948768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971723,0.0002548049,0.000077488796,0.00018107222,0.0013065565,0.0010078143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961104,0.0016295097,0.0006377169,0.00014702276,0.0008870659,0.00058844895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012195453,0.00022093495,0.0002830202,0.0019314709,0.012742693,0.00565017,0.0010062568,0.0027570783,0.0055802003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052926135,0.00039911532,0.00033970753,0.004328817,0.008579083,0.0015208552,0.0017915905,0.0021776254,0.00026797087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009610071,0.00003412381,0.03664854,0.0003144003,0.000047438833,0.0014243205,0.018107187,0.00041993504,0.00053449324,0.8576935,0.06067047,0.024009472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009194627,0.000057278445,0.26431867,0.001050194,0.0002705966,0.0011084117,0.022302028,0.00069588167,0.0012043715,0.046415634,0.66228443,0.00020054469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99787664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09498718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09498718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1149645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6891834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16363319","doi":"10.29173/alr325","title":"Taking Measure of the Charter’s Equality Guarantee: A Comment on the Court of Appeal’s Ruling in Morrow v. Zhang","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Minor (academic); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; High Court; History","score_opus":0.09682964536252264,"score_gpt":0.36413324369650113,"score_spread":0.2673035983339785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16363319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0138645265,0.011246739,0.0010789201,0.8794284,0.0058368766,0.00008397999,0.00046472237,0.00012680975,0.08786905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17863259,0.0035421716,0.0014432556,0.75606126,0.004219877,0.00009819342,0.00019243093,0.000085461266,0.0557248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772807,0.0026965765,0.0009334307,0.002884885,0.010983491,0.005220998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97518176,0.013967806,0.00059234485,0.00062965817,0.007936382,0.0016920874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01687354,0.00079987355,0.0016166414,0.0016595095,0.023083445,0.012132147,0.008938622,0.040532634,0.0043647913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04288549,0.0017793237,0.0018065529,0.0022642326,0.014147125,0.0029636517,0.002343905,0.040897064,0.0009617405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009149581,0.00003278033,0.0014461583,0.00013221135,0.00005384139,0.00089201704,0.0070620375,0.00036294656,0.0006287692,0.32111636,0.6586289,0.00955264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002097249,0.000085530715,0.009682684,0.0006501282,0.00025077214,0.00029960962,0.0056773075,0.00086060626,0.0019980662,0.036438715,0.9434455,0.00040130166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92946833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9436182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07053167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055634458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106517844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4036581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1655023742","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1116","title":"The Common Law Confessions Rule in the Charter Era: Current Law and Future Directions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Interrogation; Supreme court; Law; Suspect; Charter; Political science; Jury; Exclusionary rule; Rule of law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Common law; Due process; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Sources of law","score_opus":0.062391836377596155,"score_gpt":0.3610520596228769,"score_spread":0.29866022324528074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1655023742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053200237,0.18300043,0.010054722,0.7216599,0.0024469576,0.00007105975,0.00017723741,0.0002155966,0.07705405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29104856,0.41589594,0.03222836,0.21899353,0.009814355,0.00026859518,0.0004079404,0.00021262241,0.031130096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885876,0.0024568846,0.0004655252,0.0015642606,0.0047788788,0.0021467719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596404,0.023929927,0.0022326214,0.0019226788,0.009002949,0.003271554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028708087,0.0006779352,0.00139485,0.0029994166,0.008181848,0.019098364,0.006187906,0.016709475,0.012686821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037880607,0.0006923335,0.00111553,0.004289845,0.059791964,0.023431148,0.003871161,0.017547397,0.0016917201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018944995,0.000045918456,0.000406956,0.00036345018,0.0000060948696,0.00011673537,0.0012891765,0.0004222518,0.000118071985,0.89167434,0.028222436,0.07731576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033261356,0.000076854645,0.0012618323,0.0029694377,0.00002271622,0.00014194295,0.003915018,0.0009414493,0.00030151827,0.4228827,0.5672769,0.00017637343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53294003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43909964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53294003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046753448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.105204746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93962115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661077792","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.1948","title":"Aboriginal Gaming Challenges in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11295550669460834,"score_gpt":0.3270983709033963,"score_spread":0.21414286420878792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661077792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34663224,0.04958971,0.0011389062,0.328588,0.0019528302,0.00029634548,0.0018641314,0.00007283819,0.26986495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84881157,0.03517206,0.0019294482,0.048717164,0.00051133183,0.00017619325,0.0004417134,0.00008047437,0.0641601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925604,0.0012184394,0.00032004504,0.00040265988,0.002619502,0.002878965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97417986,0.008345147,0.000925818,0.0004651764,0.011502086,0.0045819166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065265265,0.00034212883,0.0009045269,0.004010975,0.023662223,0.01371594,0.0035171073,0.0045557027,0.009289026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021740727,0.00055130036,0.0006643273,0.006499723,0.00699997,0.0022032443,0.0036141032,0.0074658995,0.00033680588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003639245,0.0002545701,0.070776306,0.001619113,0.0003743976,0.003154726,0.045514915,0.0025143288,0.0004606373,0.5291884,0.20595412,0.13982457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017250764,0.00017013714,0.16700658,0.005380012,0.00074386585,0.0011660052,0.13871449,0.0030999673,0.0008189785,0.06229807,0.6200583,0.0003711405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99623173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12398091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12398091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37586156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89954865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662857842","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1238","title":"Assessing the Impact of the Ancillary Powers Doctrine on Three Decades of Charter Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Doctrine; Common law; Context (archaeology); Unavailability; Constitutional review; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0864488825808428,"score_gpt":0.4299096642051603,"score_spread":0.3434607816243175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662857842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42234927,0.04534852,0.0054739276,0.09370828,0.0014240211,0.0001933321,0.0004852421,0.00007544908,0.43094194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591793,0.010339558,0.0014478954,0.014832076,0.000715767,0.00007168945,0.0001508071,0.000051653013,0.013211158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96202403,0.0064660506,0.0009593119,0.0023032336,0.024217699,0.0040296805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8665819,0.0889753,0.010938835,0.0053525437,0.02492797,0.0032235193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040387515,0.00039691522,0.0010909977,0.0078046224,0.009790336,0.012890289,0.0038196377,0.0066551035,0.0044284854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11561793,0.00074061746,0.0010379303,0.008769483,0.016614286,0.009796926,0.004580947,0.011042752,0.00040510643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012905816,0.0001455003,0.010026484,0.00017950052,0.00008225825,0.00046496242,0.0070001446,0.0010816001,0.00032539637,0.9301991,0.006618887,0.04374717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812731,0.00082476414,0.168293,0.0037766253,0.00065055117,0.0005127985,0.014786501,0.0060972455,0.0040888228,0.29612437,0.50416034,0.00040376518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4589079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5831897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5410921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062289383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06231203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1664654441","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1122","title":"Section 7 of the Charter and the Common Law Rules of Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Statute; Precedent; Discretion; Public law","score_opus":0.1424107293925868,"score_gpt":0.35785681000866404,"score_spread":0.21544608061607723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1664654441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008450549,0.016640611,0.15905675,0.13740507,0.014347303,0.0029044957,0.004271307,0.0010758955,0.65584797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23652534,0.020011557,0.23958369,0.3032202,0.019578988,0.00821028,0.0031121112,0.0005498528,0.169208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94066703,0.014672747,0.010232888,0.0053737513,0.023765998,0.005287544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432361,0.032853153,0.0038177182,0.0051801573,0.0132070575,0.0017057975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040347822,0.0012062432,0.002307382,0.0034518698,0.0070024524,0.013351788,0.0039282697,0.031854033,0.0077337045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058140185,0.0026666247,0.005112531,0.0019583139,0.025720153,0.0058125346,0.004035687,0.028157743,0.006356718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016506448,0.000022040953,0.00020918557,0.00011974189,0.000017999908,0.00016391237,0.0003935473,0.00032237085,0.0002693052,0.9653463,0.029100716,0.0040183803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011120536,0.00015255983,0.0020040143,0.0017313857,0.00011579584,0.00070182804,0.0002587437,0.001010351,0.0015598165,0.5157041,0.47636303,0.0002872194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08458206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07221429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08458206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013573636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050982665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21338224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1683310909","doi":"","title":"Property on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Medicine; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06912450592017458,"score_gpt":0.3243551244564897,"score_spread":0.2552306185363151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1683310909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21288423,0.028771427,0.0011437327,0.1311131,0.0015371141,0.00033225055,0.00161583,0.00007762169,0.6225248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91154325,0.021913841,0.0012629613,0.024825387,0.0003950224,0.00013817206,0.000583078,0.0000755324,0.039262883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868528,0.0014316187,0.00036594376,0.0011205111,0.004105951,0.00612317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845071,0.0051175645,0.0010453135,0.00065538625,0.0047595976,0.00391494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067695333,0.0007265855,0.000881308,0.0066486793,0.058743984,0.014634306,0.0053099203,0.010044467,0.011391882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026467888,0.0009230404,0.00083122763,0.016234888,0.0212507,0.0042861397,0.00940025,0.011881364,0.00051842304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010424165,0.00013539454,0.018184407,0.000501861,0.000058541722,0.014134169,0.0879142,0.0010229858,0.00035539214,0.6879816,0.15771471,0.031892434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005331387,0.000030334304,0.031247037,0.0014559127,0.00011511425,0.0027859136,0.123522356,0.0007547559,0.00030532727,0.026677521,0.81279844,0.00025405217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99715745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22832173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22832173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26892236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8950374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1684499473","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1041","title":"The Constitutionalization of Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Charter; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04635053413305692,"score_gpt":0.34955141580249277,"score_spread":0.3032008816694359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1684499473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0697894,0.016553892,0.049135942,0.056205776,0.0011934027,0.0003206324,0.0007028235,0.0002819525,0.80581623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551173,0.004149613,0.007314845,0.00705948,0.001137508,0.00048081938,0.0001825452,0.00007983956,0.02447808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96739185,0.009605626,0.0025977567,0.0061583174,0.010320104,0.003926377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97385615,0.013067375,0.0015995778,0.006102587,0.003959325,0.001414973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026703656,0.0004103847,0.0009884556,0.0028207586,0.0070223347,0.018537818,0.0034340562,0.009684104,0.0064835497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041337095,0.0010593972,0.0009962826,0.002469048,0.03910061,0.011079529,0.0078751305,0.012751177,0.0010331593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041959706,0.0000052100663,0.000086021326,0.000013966403,0.0000026826438,0.000029986435,0.00038002635,0.000072755975,0.00014191328,0.99647766,0.0006464743,0.002139186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005013246,0.00007664055,0.0014058093,0.00033367562,0.000053203476,0.0002767238,0.0007560159,0.0006383799,0.0015596703,0.84989333,0.14487778,0.00007867494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030631779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024852639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030631779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017398026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017810177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14122415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697066185","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1202","title":"Grant, Suberu and Harrison: Detention, the Right to Counsel and a New Analysis under Section 24(2): Some Practical Impacts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Right to counsel; Discretion; Section (typography); Test (biology); Political science; Remand (court procedure); High Court; Statement (logic); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05872340611161409,"score_gpt":0.3696385201887816,"score_spread":0.31091511407716754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1697066185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0188129,0.047555324,0.0037912684,0.8927076,0.0036906805,0.00009784987,0.000112486465,0.000023887525,0.03320811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40305305,0.040998653,0.014841327,0.49937552,0.009336653,0.00021566426,0.000100484096,0.000068602465,0.03201008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771199,0.009156127,0.0009301875,0.0013443364,0.008858711,0.00259072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94976926,0.041431874,0.0012483366,0.00061312085,0.0055410746,0.0013963451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033914253,0.0006160966,0.0011982659,0.0028158578,0.011366852,0.014459719,0.005050872,0.021201286,0.0023990166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05658974,0.00058035273,0.0010878594,0.0029763991,0.021098478,0.009268675,0.005564112,0.020373885,0.00033098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072742674,0.000049472346,0.0018248656,0.00030992285,0.000048748847,0.001231893,0.008551444,0.00050568336,0.0005969773,0.82161033,0.13353255,0.031665355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014398334,0.00010869159,0.009448632,0.001872323,0.00016998974,0.0006788219,0.020926567,0.0014433688,0.0013643664,0.5171221,0.44638535,0.0003357481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34921122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63507396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34921122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020191798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04710671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69435716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702021691","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Canadian Legislation and Case Law: Prince Edward Island","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.38526012086536093,"score_gpt":0.5019600754959659,"score_spread":0.11669995463060495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1702021691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040170085,0.038336035,0.002443883,0.04901034,0.004872605,0.002453956,0.07542781,0.0011716171,0.8222668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008209683,0.03210073,0.0057758535,0.0023913116,0.00037835556,0.00094636576,0.015841665,0.00050225726,0.9338538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948376,0.0005622915,0.00046987683,0.00042702857,0.0031564143,0.00054677617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94748706,0.00987913,0.00081079453,0.001474524,0.038303297,0.0020451779],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008958053,0.001427776,0.0013542119,0.0121663585,0.009712347,0.011696278,0.0029194287,0.0040064156,0.25331584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033251815,0.0014952957,0.00071745896,0.021243546,0.0032165912,0.0045450805,0.0021947236,0.0040354645,0.05071028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011545826,0.000023473565,0.0004115771,0.0005064795,0.0000035737332,0.000026078644,0.00062706834,0.00012260083,0.000049410897,0.007505053,0.94290996,0.047803137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016251552,0.000006881333,0.0053189583,0.0013238306,0.000012135096,0.00002239241,0.001621145,0.00011708506,0.0001652629,0.0016983696,0.98966694,0.000030760246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97094977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98036677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06570126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2169296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8474259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W170717355","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2465292","title":"LLAbolition Du Registre Des Armes DDDpaule: Le RRle Potentiel Des Principes Non crits (The Long-Gun Registry Case: The Potential Role of Unwritten Constitutional Principles)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012797075183093094,"score_gpt":0.2616013956093119,"score_spread":0.2488043204262188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W170717355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08723138,0.0041865185,0.11285349,0.14347215,0.0031598245,0.0004891449,0.0010530824,0.00054089166,0.6470136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8424225,0.00089419837,0.02737842,0.025564859,0.0012684625,0.000783595,0.00016216433,0.00017440303,0.10135147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96246785,0.013550349,0.0024803556,0.007314203,0.009254695,0.004932644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97463596,0.014650389,0.0017030508,0.0051396345,0.0029991376,0.0008718696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038806878,0.0006113359,0.0012743147,0.0016724747,0.008241498,0.012769143,0.004609003,0.014132383,0.008933686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06510598,0.001340397,0.0014249193,0.0012429588,0.01363978,0.007314253,0.0056980434,0.017680155,0.0018355813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023199222,0.000017072247,0.00064776465,0.00002277495,0.0000086053515,0.000050860817,0.0003139763,0.0003131477,0.000091691974,0.9909354,0.004350371,0.0032250257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003175755,0.00033281342,0.0065882923,0.00044929617,0.00014620871,0.0007053627,0.0016349321,0.008305677,0.0039107874,0.7565674,0.22080947,0.00023215516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040556572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038496953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95944345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071545662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018610839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2052328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1711771721","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1217","title":"The Interrogation Trilogy and the Protections for Interrogated Suspects in Canadian Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Trilogy; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.08277040635567212,"score_gpt":0.3438659246500198,"score_spread":0.2610955182943477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1711771721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11531931,0.047047064,0.008583213,0.16495854,0.001006529,0.00029144887,0.0006119722,0.00014283686,0.6620391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002229,0.022363195,0.003508108,0.027222263,0.0002770724,0.00011069687,0.00022527309,0.00005210899,0.046018388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861351,0.002493033,0.0005522889,0.0011316357,0.0065402393,0.003147587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816382,0.007551086,0.0017600985,0.0008172718,0.007063286,0.0011701487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009317906,0.00042926148,0.0004949317,0.0044075097,0.017521685,0.008188936,0.0031452915,0.0056299553,0.0066715754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03877844,0.0008200309,0.0006860495,0.0043089027,0.026581021,0.004280724,0.0042463266,0.0076940237,0.00050772756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064839776,0.000044195047,0.0052892584,0.00034426918,0.000023909635,0.001064856,0.025147911,0.00041809867,0.0005314106,0.8718294,0.031513188,0.06372874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001646833,0.00017070399,0.08846844,0.0027667661,0.00026982633,0.0015669549,0.033349577,0.00205915,0.0022228442,0.15900953,0.7093704,0.0005811997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9788311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07033455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07033455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1597717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5103153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722558755","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1279","title":"The Death of Oakes: Time for a Rights-Specific Approach?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Set (abstract data type); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06730119988863748,"score_gpt":0.3259241155007634,"score_spread":0.2586229156121259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722558755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087149525,0.031155704,0.012860185,0.793797,0.007998881,0.00003900055,0.000087465676,0.000040961666,0.14530584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39409366,0.026334407,0.011767793,0.498186,0.0074323765,0.00011158669,0.00013202721,0.00013182226,0.061810344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98452723,0.0054423716,0.0007518072,0.0021927038,0.0057884646,0.0012974921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798007,0.013166872,0.0010439495,0.001263597,0.0038990702,0.00082580134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027179608,0.00038767635,0.0010357349,0.0013634365,0.0050628413,0.00977303,0.003660989,0.009485328,0.004994897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03793623,0.0003086722,0.00068936154,0.0010779025,0.03114518,0.018955203,0.0042520827,0.022899617,0.00071780366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059659087,0.0000047112967,0.00012958526,0.00004450986,0.0000058127553,0.00005882248,0.00080015237,0.000042573065,0.000031707812,0.9778831,0.01228208,0.008710968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013832164,0.00003590652,0.00064794696,0.00077953585,0.000021471455,0.00015924983,0.0036574404,0.00017693506,0.00033016832,0.5487564,0.44537508,0.000045963563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05527802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097625785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05527802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009327308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020752067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14374125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1723956093","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1214","title":"What Happens at a Bail Hearing Anyway?: The Supreme Court's Troubling Retreat from the Openness Principle in Toronto Star v. Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Charter; Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Deference; Context (archaeology); Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10462871659499695,"score_gpt":0.3336438235793268,"score_spread":0.22901510698432986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1723956093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11762338,0.017715506,0.00455601,0.57871634,0.0013972949,0.000114855495,0.0005025829,0.000064471795,0.2793095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796933,0.0065607303,0.0011261479,0.089659244,0.00059404917,0.000038188573,0.00007876304,0.00005230827,0.022197247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98863655,0.001745994,0.00026466718,0.0010284844,0.004812112,0.0035121622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853046,0.007411352,0.0006157327,0.00027062246,0.0019101169,0.001261812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094415955,0.00033464242,0.0007411061,0.001579212,0.025713764,0.012270773,0.003895163,0.016738446,0.0037862738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024589641,0.00070870697,0.0007757387,0.0027321412,0.028020764,0.0052598245,0.004216721,0.02771704,0.00024659466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008370068,0.000042758038,0.005049013,0.00014293025,0.00004531123,0.0024238138,0.024458332,0.00059406273,0.0004069976,0.88816005,0.06264357,0.015949469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031343286,0.000093965136,0.029858628,0.0012759365,0.00035055613,0.0009965446,0.060641903,0.002699256,0.0020458242,0.43683437,0.46436387,0.0005257038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09626669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09626669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12595809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69846696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1737600285","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720120801.586","title":"The Development of Criminal Litigation Legislation Since the Founding of P.R.C.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07624792978885428,"score_gpt":0.3488322464516246,"score_spread":0.2725843166627703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1737600285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5502473,0.046669908,0.0048476,0.06454181,0.0021341678,0.00051563693,0.0013934883,0.0008477378,0.3288024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8631478,0.015178771,0.004292225,0.014899041,0.0006167535,0.00017226796,0.0007941053,0.000071586524,0.10082744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962877,0.0002979299,0.00025513742,0.0008673352,0.0014528192,0.00083909783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973742,0.00036143133,0.00064083753,0.00017624258,0.0009247913,0.0005225338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002702172,0.00043466635,0.00026412148,0.0017266563,0.0029729994,0.002427564,0.001208879,0.0018932988,0.005022596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045283264,0.00042785754,0.00049037964,0.0019756116,0.0024464466,0.0020699175,0.0020421185,0.0023683042,0.00064594776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001833987,0.00025368732,0.057656225,0.0015231135,0.0000833165,0.0032913578,0.009741273,0.0016146651,0.010835634,0.29461238,0.10652382,0.5136812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039184542,0.00032210525,0.23047872,0.00044726796,0.00006222389,0.0006865283,0.0014960705,0.001041838,0.00534094,0.0036338014,0.7563349,0.00011644393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16008899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.139449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16008899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01422167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027364474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3183143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740233832","doi":"","title":"Rounding Up the Usual Criminal Suspects, and a Few More Civil Ones: Section 7 After \"Chaoulli\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Vagueness; Criminal law; Section (typography); Arbitrariness; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01978160009590462,"score_gpt":0.3204070949783039,"score_spread":0.30062549488239926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740233832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07906343,0.027676435,0.031912368,0.24737205,0.008834871,0.0006175683,0.0004288947,0.00046383773,0.6036305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6397948,0.006501425,0.021180244,0.16005827,0.0022144308,0.0005367357,0.00033002018,0.00025458634,0.16912942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937383,0.001627292,0.00028057818,0.00087715563,0.002536006,0.00094072544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99060947,0.004655771,0.0009637794,0.0006677236,0.0025796136,0.0005237225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004701827,0.00044258474,0.00043142503,0.0024986535,0.011657906,0.006650604,0.0011217197,0.005441812,0.004240371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018290417,0.00042718512,0.0006020703,0.0013222522,0.015026791,0.0058111376,0.0037954901,0.012952098,0.0015092454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048972717,0.00003202051,0.0033666708,0.0001155852,0.00000897983,0.00043500078,0.009669722,0.00012703829,0.0006396838,0.83780265,0.09835736,0.04939633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023625054,0.00015138886,0.010491839,0.00073935476,0.00003214779,0.00085922366,0.008308307,0.00046466422,0.002595913,0.21380995,0.7623878,0.00013581531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025430882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050723113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025430882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058248397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009067124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05056572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741046706","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1201","title":"“Detention” under the Charter after R. v. Grant and R. v. Suberu","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Political science; Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Remand (court procedure); Psychology","score_opus":0.035084537543816165,"score_gpt":0.3195177534237348,"score_spread":0.2844332158799186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741046706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52345663,0.009494293,0.026880736,0.1932134,0.0058975327,0.0007298434,0.00075907126,0.0005902515,0.23897834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323831,0.0014263915,0.004819471,0.024494838,0.00038311092,0.00012543329,0.00009385529,0.00004790835,0.03622582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980923,0.0039626746,0.0006153915,0.0015312558,0.007851058,0.0051166797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870558,0.007343199,0.0011095728,0.0005881084,0.0029838907,0.0009194269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107061,0.0005249755,0.00048425485,0.0010954192,0.009146496,0.003317229,0.0022926922,0.0074131438,0.0014377033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02827265,0.00047161317,0.0010561539,0.0008472464,0.007292394,0.0023352157,0.002666375,0.012529336,0.00024080423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001802459,0.0001358958,0.00913973,0.00014019609,0.0000518928,0.0028982703,0.021618728,0.0013497793,0.002745442,0.8300605,0.07598778,0.055691544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002417865,0.0010608708,0.06363384,0.00079029787,0.00047518118,0.0033704776,0.028033007,0.0051175784,0.016122283,0.12682398,0.75307596,0.001254717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45982864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64956725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5401714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0151430555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042860482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91430426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174738811","doi":"","title":"Finnish Criminal Policy from the 1960’s and Beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal investigation; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04545636650670786,"score_gpt":0.3531117476113966,"score_spread":0.3076553811046887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174738811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56775934,0.09904336,0.0009629239,0.022973401,0.0019392502,0.000048907415,0.0038336362,0.000063974934,0.30337527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95239204,0.01206199,0.00049850205,0.0010266996,0.00024707924,0.000037795406,0.000857894,0.000017454724,0.032860544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823856,0.0002044082,0.00017703018,0.00032009312,0.0003029367,0.0007568678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788254,0.00073969254,0.0003119803,0.00008770057,0.00045182183,0.0005261699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019041299,0.00060882804,0.00058554497,0.0040263315,0.004864148,0.0041593616,0.0007872341,0.0024544285,0.0098222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051431893,0.00061397755,0.0005587733,0.0031779276,0.0018344301,0.0030146744,0.0029355169,0.0017977331,0.0008167272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001073144,0.00029062867,0.10654503,0.004150584,0.0005171289,0.009537603,0.044939224,0.0055349856,0.00245781,0.4914049,0.052089863,0.28145903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010726119,0.00026485368,0.42344597,0.005370996,0.0004945896,0.0019107803,0.016395202,0.0013312035,0.0028599014,0.020513654,0.52711874,0.0001868755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12537791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20241821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12537791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017047955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019853031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24929625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751803832","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1172","title":"A More Lasting Comfort?: The Politics of Minimum Sentences, the Rule of Law and R. v. Ferguson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.056072567626597764,"score_gpt":0.3494054192767731,"score_spread":0.2933328516501753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1751803832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010998832,0.031516496,0.00085477217,0.8857708,0.0011749442,0.000008805365,0.000040030798,0.000009660164,0.06962576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6048983,0.013821194,0.0011914156,0.34976694,0.0034617607,0.000036991216,0.00003426692,0.00004509021,0.026743941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911378,0.003973243,0.00019243227,0.0009946534,0.0023449669,0.001356812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909835,0.006759315,0.0005619343,0.0002095992,0.0007760812,0.0007096135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01073696,0.0002449917,0.0006418268,0.0010214736,0.009996005,0.009440368,0.0014442317,0.013331506,0.0024088006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020117298,0.00032145155,0.000365874,0.0009526986,0.030811826,0.00782445,0.0020720528,0.015869338,0.00032894127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022695604,0.000014979863,0.00029740727,0.000030872758,0.00000533991,0.00011368447,0.002690777,0.00005862588,0.00010953415,0.927328,0.062403694,0.0069243964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006737616,0.000059983056,0.0043836045,0.0006377304,0.000037350113,0.00019236103,0.010141467,0.00032008206,0.00040157605,0.5918494,0.39179167,0.0001174707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30214363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4713688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30214363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017213237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014583024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60076994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175225971","doi":"","title":"Attaquer une décision en révision judiciaire (Challenging Administrative Decisions on Judicial Review)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Humanities; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047646981294231484,"score_gpt":0.37652056200066264,"score_spread":0.32887358070643113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175225971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042948533,0.029230189,0.028202806,0.2817406,0.007875661,0.000406751,0.00019962444,0.00029273907,0.6091031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7425987,0.0048287977,0.007639182,0.0365347,0.006110005,0.00022728044,0.00005727777,0.00013928996,0.20186481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716339,0.014434337,0.0011603868,0.0029118282,0.006144795,0.0037148106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780939,0.013232573,0.001256486,0.0012777062,0.005441864,0.0006974096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019527249,0.0006202006,0.0006173004,0.0016365523,0.010473454,0.016165616,0.0019579504,0.015186309,0.00994867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03702955,0.00043485677,0.001214811,0.0012085014,0.013919215,0.0046857526,0.003377272,0.008222555,0.0022298056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049271002,0.000019893998,0.0004363115,0.0001406917,0.000019712412,0.00070202304,0.007042053,0.0007617489,0.0005507056,0.91150945,0.062777795,0.015990287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045641988,0.00009165519,0.0024090616,0.0004426805,0.0000469377,0.0006004354,0.0035641284,0.0018737947,0.0016700806,0.1658354,0.823294,0.00012628998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074200444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07413923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074200444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022126622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016138572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16054064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754226533","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1024","title":"Constitutional Casualties of September 11: Limiting the Legacy of the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Statute; Conviction; Law; Political science; Presumption; Presumption of innocence","score_opus":0.098687175941766,"score_gpt":0.3428456381365486,"score_spread":0.2441584621947826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754226533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07360569,0.0030518265,0.004755037,0.10067367,0.0058556157,0.0008086523,0.0024550147,0.0007047536,0.80808973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6406822,0.002572836,0.0054881065,0.14885862,0.0042447727,0.0008446159,0.0011252372,0.0002403109,0.19594328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98501915,0.001795186,0.00082821824,0.0024217442,0.0065230606,0.0034126574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871536,0.005547398,0.0010364462,0.0017059101,0.0025201174,0.002036635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01086467,0.00086699694,0.00068615674,0.0015962131,0.008408118,0.016824229,0.004545913,0.019701945,0.008458279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022514552,0.0012403145,0.0011770804,0.001041013,0.01224214,0.0035132559,0.005049236,0.017063575,0.0022353798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001237201,0.00016322802,0.004401128,0.0001346876,0.000042438965,0.0014377229,0.0038804656,0.00067093695,0.0028086395,0.8239589,0.14188775,0.020490425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021583455,0.000334529,0.02195279,0.00053199125,0.00013941333,0.0009388655,0.0027904164,0.0013075438,0.0023506023,0.043479823,0.9256807,0.0002775428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38070732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5449637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38070732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01945763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029637387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7569827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764206910","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1113","title":"Arbitrary Detention: Whither — or Wither?: Section 9","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Prima facie; Charter; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Test (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.09843138157882267,"score_gpt":0.3471047990116318,"score_spread":0.24867341743280916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764206910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15196294,0.008454917,0.014887315,0.20442039,0.0039829775,0.00006678889,0.0001167429,0.00010469388,0.61600333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88026875,0.0022870076,0.002532694,0.04086275,0.0009554223,0.000034349374,0.00005038516,0.00008833625,0.07292031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990333,0.0028524413,0.0003178357,0.0015575562,0.0027822305,0.0021568607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457836,0.0024869458,0.000614145,0.0006799068,0.0010355541,0.0006050876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062493766,0.00022809439,0.0003380729,0.00051459693,0.008076227,0.01121783,0.0018380056,0.005371246,0.0039995164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014564412,0.00034030993,0.00043340732,0.0005702594,0.021058954,0.010689783,0.005078427,0.011270196,0.00062942103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020424914,0.000019236917,0.0015153883,0.000032508757,0.0000038000082,0.0002682579,0.0058065597,0.00011605651,0.0002166361,0.9656411,0.012731941,0.013628165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024280353,0.00015586228,0.00970292,0.0008349723,0.00003158298,0.0006868534,0.018377973,0.0008444929,0.002515798,0.3625049,0.6041516,0.00016882538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05116334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10979182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05116334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008597756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011019203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10173106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767010817","doi":"","title":"'The Melancholy Truth': Corrective and Equitable Justice for Omar Khadr","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Harm; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Appeal; Order (exchange); Proposition; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Faith; Repatriation; Law and economics; Remedial education; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056058050570153686,"score_gpt":0.38319732613740065,"score_spread":0.327139275567247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767010817","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13496618,0.014060917,0.004083205,0.61622643,0.0024553624,0.00014091926,0.00008925116,0.00009243342,0.22788528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399727,0.0015395795,0.0018356608,0.041983787,0.00034575321,0.00001793914,0.000012044367,0.000020188956,0.014272417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914186,0.0027066316,0.00035869627,0.00062431593,0.0026115899,0.0022801775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460346,0.0023901209,0.00057281554,0.00041474894,0.0014147566,0.0006041083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010126706,0.00027569017,0.0005377836,0.0008325462,0.02481911,0.011220312,0.0013771357,0.010541791,0.0034334688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014436667,0.0003135686,0.00032499927,0.0006291386,0.026293987,0.0039971387,0.0051925397,0.011131841,0.0003660889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005178536,0.00005501609,0.0018497749,0.00011918716,0.000020217489,0.0010424888,0.024122484,0.0002864867,0.0006669508,0.9198889,0.033237517,0.018659014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009110674,0.0001298333,0.011712924,0.00094128953,0.00010808489,0.001509425,0.0946144,0.0011172734,0.0027739312,0.34712568,0.53956944,0.00030663444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25284246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41936314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7471576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017899549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031972386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50274146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767433710","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1194","title":"Supreme Court Recognizes (a Derivative) Right to Access Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Access to information; Constitutional right; Right to privacy; Information access","score_opus":0.05450529070080008,"score_gpt":0.36725654651546313,"score_spread":0.31275125581466307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767433710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01547439,0.0032039243,0.0037082953,0.09521323,0.0009518169,0.00018091628,0.0012750883,0.00018095975,0.87981147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50676924,0.003327025,0.0046631563,0.16944854,0.0010547184,0.00027155693,0.0008689308,0.00010650876,0.3134903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766051,0.0018123824,0.0010437699,0.0024943512,0.011859246,0.0061850785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98774046,0.003928405,0.0003613426,0.001170975,0.005651638,0.0011471972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00876761,0.00046431198,0.0010413274,0.001470523,0.013856572,0.012180476,0.0029482702,0.017091341,0.009131085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021674586,0.00087182,0.0009538701,0.0019447727,0.012349394,0.0038540286,0.00484655,0.0134048015,0.002447259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023219525,0.000023830447,0.0007284467,0.000043252512,0.000014817589,0.00028511861,0.0026747326,0.00011056951,0.000486299,0.9152551,0.0731211,0.007233626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079307916,0.0000500018,0.0041214074,0.00043982978,0.00008235417,0.00036936114,0.0013934013,0.00041047108,0.0007876623,0.11647207,0.8756597,0.00013458054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8042044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84194756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8042044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02220505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07858864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3938973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778929457","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1237","title":"Charter Protection against Unlawful Police Action: Less Black and White Than It Seems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Tort; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1360243581166527,"score_gpt":0.36688718135446763,"score_spread":0.23086282323781493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778929457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04617726,0.024419878,0.030588413,0.33599362,0.0050208303,0.0002468834,0.0002010092,0.0004043105,0.5569478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76753,0.0066852355,0.011716734,0.12084933,0.0038646604,0.00034943095,0.00009862123,0.00015417476,0.088751815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97789395,0.008077591,0.0007769132,0.0029167617,0.007994531,0.0023401817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760694,0.013366023,0.0024551123,0.002865987,0.003854868,0.0013885653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018780993,0.00047799802,0.00091148017,0.0015198085,0.0059078867,0.015737664,0.0018837434,0.010969045,0.0036141805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031973816,0.000743857,0.0006569101,0.00094087975,0.019712899,0.00791593,0.003773063,0.012843237,0.00087690115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023848474,0.00003061399,0.00041564644,0.00009634897,0.000011211185,0.00010071396,0.0023735347,0.000244895,0.00051813375,0.9582621,0.023802198,0.01412073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001261743,0.00036003953,0.006154675,0.001202906,0.0001008585,0.00034186244,0.0020867302,0.0013264208,0.0023871728,0.38490766,0.60082936,0.0001761204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022265038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033191726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058921496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01758133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099324584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1783575409","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1275","title":"R. v. Khawaja: At the Limits of Fundamental Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Statute; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.09481146920036855,"score_gpt":0.3702600371720951,"score_spread":0.27544856797172657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1783575409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11686189,0.009644131,0.010814654,0.1419752,0.0013003793,0.0002460379,0.00044531917,0.00042278215,0.7182895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9014109,0.001738263,0.0032596705,0.05724789,0.00038804053,0.00014656366,0.0000793734,0.00006730862,0.03566201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888715,0.0015264457,0.0004895938,0.0018741756,0.0035855696,0.0036527894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314237,0.0039723394,0.00038968638,0.00063294003,0.0014274969,0.00043524322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007260186,0.00052197353,0.0007470513,0.000827281,0.012629337,0.01447735,0.002864507,0.013355099,0.00347123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015113187,0.0009166574,0.00097562093,0.00079416414,0.01972347,0.00690824,0.0043059555,0.018272454,0.00081896805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002300937,0.000010281148,0.000324316,0.000033555538,0.000006164957,0.00012169822,0.0024799106,0.0001213459,0.0003015506,0.98431474,0.008500606,0.0037628226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018709412,0.00016794262,0.0065215095,0.00069168303,0.00015908634,0.0006412115,0.0072878045,0.0014922057,0.0028126615,0.62564427,0.35398543,0.00040903868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5014125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60006386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5014125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024289994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03929526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785708482","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1229","title":"The Constitution of Criminal Justice in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Psychology","score_opus":0.0695485440875672,"score_gpt":0.3494029155400848,"score_spread":0.27985437145251757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785708482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043807045,0.0148745775,0.0022318058,0.100188576,0.0014316478,0.00025568155,0.0017145728,0.00018067984,0.83531547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6911158,0.008541891,0.0043150242,0.022587327,0.000358668,0.000176731,0.0005347786,0.00013067515,0.27223912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419445,0.00046723124,0.00014783785,0.0005053376,0.0023199688,0.002365241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610704,0.0005414285,0.000114967734,0.00015022302,0.0021393686,0.00094700156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021845305,0.00045398844,0.00063721824,0.0029527335,0.023493301,0.012187477,0.0020188834,0.0047285217,0.00991242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007858558,0.000857225,0.0005121595,0.0045926534,0.009923926,0.0023203262,0.0029751612,0.005303399,0.0004399476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001096779,0.000012862279,0.0011608904,0.00003602667,0.000010908914,0.00010951188,0.0019997878,0.0007160269,0.000102014994,0.945312,0.042280354,0.008248625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003549915,0.0000143730795,0.01093939,0.00025289526,0.000042714517,0.00007274152,0.0043992884,0.0016627539,0.0002738769,0.1038045,0.87835294,0.00014904424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99896777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2402558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2402558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39064667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8811956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1788573043","doi":"10.22459/fpwt.07.2008.04","title":"Protecting Constitutionalism in Treacherous Times: Why ‘Rights’ Don’t Matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ANU Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08120039955318752,"score_gpt":0.2998857787756909,"score_spread":0.21868537922250336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1788573043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018826647,0.023192074,0.011089612,0.33084056,0.001823008,0.000030554453,0.00006141659,0.00006199198,0.6140741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84236485,0.008911053,0.0054461844,0.069614775,0.001475104,0.00014629612,0.00006631796,0.00024866377,0.071726665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932259,0.0041882275,0.00016897143,0.0006390393,0.0011138489,0.00066414196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897602,0.008068704,0.00033136134,0.000778778,0.0006809099,0.00038000388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01214476,0.00035981621,0.0005037371,0.0012004451,0.006477029,0.012935897,0.0014560181,0.009184225,0.007759071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016595878,0.00039197376,0.00033421104,0.0011540585,0.07088897,0.026270496,0.0044484874,0.013914157,0.0011886532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002731355,0.000003414119,0.00003842401,0.000016248554,0.0000012162113,0.000022079472,0.0038137466,0.000025974254,0.0000233314,0.98768836,0.004758905,0.0036054975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011807731,0.0000074297977,0.00020793168,0.00025704404,0.0000035528817,0.0000582065,0.0038702406,0.00007969029,0.00014745309,0.8472132,0.1481331,0.000010300645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066241384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009630664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012935897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049758134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004122365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064228415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792534912","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1111","title":"The Limits of Privacy: Some Reflections on Section 8 of the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Supreme court; Dignity; Charter; Warrant; Law; Jurisprudence; Normative; Autonomy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Right to privacy; Trespass; Sociology; Law and economics; Business","score_opus":0.1565261154772932,"score_gpt":0.39212240396100967,"score_spread":0.23559628848371647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792534912","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015965458,0.01864702,0.009415735,0.7497771,0.0030777813,0.000056433473,0.000074596974,0.00004040907,0.20294543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6163948,0.020385975,0.0078327805,0.30589768,0.009444029,0.0004156831,0.0000826298,0.00018179466,0.039364696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95344746,0.026167719,0.001566301,0.0039548003,0.009197554,0.0056661433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627322,0.031354915,0.0011014302,0.001189409,0.0026869085,0.00093518355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035291295,0.00081056415,0.0013009574,0.0016615544,0.015445566,0.02687369,0.0052630636,0.029882919,0.0031099338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04041067,0.0010095364,0.0017946443,0.0016612033,0.09197697,0.027335685,0.010899305,0.0469753,0.0005778347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061960855,0.000006338383,0.00007408762,0.00001509062,0.000001941319,0.00017885973,0.006418045,0.00008761006,0.000050205166,0.9851046,0.0066630654,0.001393969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000221522,0.000032016324,0.00032329853,0.00045731728,0.0000105545805,0.00020844639,0.01211051,0.00037991384,0.00022474787,0.780105,0.20605536,0.00007069949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07696512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05940025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97759616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022403814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019615442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18664044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1793832989","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.3092","title":"Vie privée et surveillance ambiante : le droit canadien en chantier","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01498176929965302,"score_gpt":0.29450981758482325,"score_spread":0.27952804828517025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1793832989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13180216,0.010651487,0.022910358,0.05997443,0.0006525035,0.00014626636,0.00049751526,0.00018452051,0.77318084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906287,0.0053170044,0.004304622,0.0029534549,0.000070159826,0.0000964855,0.00014821324,0.00007392447,0.09640747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971234,0.0007780463,0.000046151094,0.0003827785,0.0010836596,0.0005859435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970663,0.00078467216,0.00024069326,0.00015372624,0.0011406064,0.00061403506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021771104,0.0004737493,0.0003322132,0.0020558184,0.011207151,0.010022088,0.001249601,0.0024355284,0.015059375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004116553,0.00027137832,0.0003443632,0.0028283496,0.015096127,0.0057084127,0.0046112854,0.003323663,0.0009861815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038179503,0.0000292142,0.011164558,0.00021414363,0.000018694876,0.0004337819,0.12695207,0.00095173076,0.00066198705,0.79386246,0.011675288,0.053997874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009174983,0.000059351554,0.020472957,0.000995446,0.00003697589,0.00034015853,0.12904784,0.0010546745,0.0005670685,0.052864432,0.7944321,0.000119769655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8275765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8497321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17242348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044889487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043438744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3468778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179477543","doi":"10.29173/alr316","title":"Negligent Investigation: A New Remedy for the Wrongly Accused: Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Economic Justice; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Accountability; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.10715983637272868,"score_gpt":0.34417589197099463,"score_spread":0.23701605559826594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179477543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016531326,0.22670202,0.0033739016,0.506331,0.0064821052,0.00035386014,0.00044386435,0.00015908504,0.23962276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28050783,0.107914634,0.0055265855,0.46099666,0.0033974417,0.00021214134,0.0004243262,0.00008118837,0.14093922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906064,0.0014541283,0.000611952,0.0012206222,0.0048023076,0.0013045468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937337,0.002791711,0.00055514,0.00030046326,0.0019389794,0.00068001123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058190194,0.0006416463,0.0005554355,0.0026251625,0.005656335,0.006950243,0.003443249,0.01983247,0.0028913815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013134665,0.0010219037,0.00073669455,0.0014331732,0.010947427,0.0039886166,0.0029554863,0.010918181,0.0006699842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007883227,0.000085984895,0.0030919528,0.0016021399,0.00007800999,0.0033746127,0.004322929,0.00040049988,0.0017292158,0.41963008,0.4883394,0.0772663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013636895,0.00009040021,0.015569117,0.0019191952,0.00016329743,0.0016442765,0.0011483983,0.00021596084,0.00095145195,0.013626548,0.96437985,0.00015516746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7435169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90061295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25648308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020900046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06664674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5159871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796572108","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511979170","title":"Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Statutory law; Discretion; Political science; Law; Sentence; Sentencing guidelines; Criminology; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04085265482509632,"score_gpt":0.2358256628848379,"score_spread":0.19497300805974158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796572108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03854418,0.040555563,0.022115288,0.078394584,0.004468532,0.0001782793,0.00011130068,0.00020669914,0.8154256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7527841,0.026079228,0.008990299,0.008720492,0.003453481,0.0002157588,0.00014185288,0.000109507266,0.19950527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937447,0.0027817783,0.00026175613,0.0003215982,0.0022245557,0.00066567975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772733,0.0012698428,0.00029203514,0.00017208495,0.0004391101,0.000099578225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002566054,0.000463855,0.0004456972,0.0018804783,0.004034648,0.0036138357,0.0010871191,0.0025773726,0.007632904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009542976,0.00022913283,0.0005907678,0.0008138923,0.0058043287,0.0033672927,0.0041742106,0.003914052,0.0010491618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017959126,0.000045105684,0.0011149714,0.0003377556,0.0000274344,0.0005839111,0.014152429,0.0020820836,0.00071699783,0.7981854,0.0638085,0.11892743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010100784,0.00010818411,0.004515201,0.0013898078,0.000049674334,0.0012239072,0.006928357,0.00086488255,0.0012640269,0.30906194,0.674505,0.000078898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027009256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044701644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007632904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024190375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049855993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02553463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1797370817","doi":"","title":"Speaking Truth to Power? The Search for Bureaucratic Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Political science; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Politics; Independence (probability theory); Public administration; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03190676826214824,"score_gpt":0.3574533647320147,"score_spread":0.3255465964698665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1797370817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04701663,0.003911244,0.007759592,0.24774612,0.00062311377,0.00006412925,0.00014624851,0.000075830336,0.6926572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95517373,0.0015767753,0.0011948383,0.013716132,0.0005496678,0.00004494047,0.00005677,0.00006849049,0.027618656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820618,0.0041166744,0.0004667558,0.0022335872,0.0061052484,0.0050158612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780237,0.009269729,0.0017203967,0.0021547864,0.004685107,0.004146251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012218872,0.00033003217,0.0006796003,0.0029564041,0.024485877,0.020094255,0.0017741018,0.004406323,0.006589041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03151911,0.0006191906,0.0004668385,0.003159399,0.101547815,0.01121946,0.0075916513,0.013402753,0.0010098144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006604485,0.0000052899154,0.00037860076,0.000009937254,0.000002646261,0.0000260661,0.005213989,0.00006277076,0.000025055097,0.98552376,0.0044048512,0.004340493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004208624,0.000010305831,0.0044606784,0.00025231115,0.00002134123,0.000049016744,0.010534649,0.00047574283,0.00022255491,0.8167484,0.16713956,0.000043363518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6027695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5990842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6027695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06503811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0982192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79913974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798478995","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1114","title":"Investigative Detention: A Search/Seizure by Any Other Name?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Charter; Constitution; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Supreme court; Duty; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.11004978399148793,"score_gpt":0.3543688446054809,"score_spread":0.24431906061399297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798478995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044870548,0.045091942,0.017282562,0.4312858,0.009121618,0.00008753309,0.00031786016,0.0003063494,0.45163584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7105517,0.021727098,0.0037458688,0.15586884,0.0066877897,0.00015429113,0.00020731651,0.00024966314,0.10080755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903182,0.0035711338,0.0005875388,0.0008454864,0.0029135086,0.001764125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410594,0.00225881,0.0012302985,0.00066199276,0.0010851126,0.0006577114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041716206,0.00037568656,0.0006098211,0.0010449109,0.005248323,0.00898892,0.0014467454,0.0049650054,0.003834421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01729075,0.00022393117,0.0004188484,0.0012880665,0.02036139,0.008704428,0.0037377616,0.007291334,0.0015082296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046796213,0.000043361142,0.0017459258,0.00018450261,0.0000062311037,0.0005708157,0.009969686,0.00010511951,0.000360726,0.80832565,0.11402653,0.06461457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024775567,0.00012174776,0.0047923,0.0021308425,0.000026408612,0.0022719495,0.026019182,0.000252229,0.0011458864,0.1527718,0.81034404,0.00009887824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022618467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024547266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022618467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004592159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010522879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04497361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798632713","doi":"","title":"Cost of Admission: One Rubber Stamp - Evaluating the Significance of Investigative Necessity in Wiretap Authorizations after R v Araujo","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Authorization; Legislature; Political science; Judicial deference; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20227030998609552,"score_gpt":0.424135452960932,"score_spread":0.2218651429748365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798632713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21645086,0.0044975015,0.016933067,0.18683109,0.0023133974,0.0005409593,0.00029462596,0.0002784333,0.5718601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93836963,0.0012063521,0.004930883,0.022367474,0.00091820734,0.0002159212,0.000069122696,0.000097997625,0.031824343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9436569,0.01584116,0.0026497392,0.0043696603,0.025364483,0.008118005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8758026,0.08831428,0.0071412097,0.007923206,0.015268745,0.0055499445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031313732,0.0005079427,0.0007921756,0.0031987515,0.0074396245,0.015801912,0.0044283634,0.014106126,0.011547293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13317347,0.00077725196,0.0013348178,0.0019331889,0.016001683,0.010341789,0.008109157,0.0153189665,0.0012798175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016629994,0.00009478015,0.0070159268,0.00014375751,0.000026609436,0.0013599199,0.0033958254,0.00048619226,0.0008733456,0.94087446,0.02188553,0.023677401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038985294,0.0014412069,0.04343103,0.0041015777,0.00060159626,0.0055194604,0.028347813,0.00823576,0.008017497,0.41555852,0.48355925,0.00079639634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028865986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051134642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031313732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011404122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028831625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16560483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798828826","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139962964.004","title":"Enough About Me: Why Privacy is About Power, not Consent (or Harm)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Internet privacy; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07493607685941893,"score_gpt":0.2876754027174099,"score_spread":0.21273932585799094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798828826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021253382,0.07904893,0.014366982,0.38924056,0.0050198487,0.00005175372,0.00017476696,0.00010727772,0.50986457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2239049,0.0959889,0.015911825,0.18188214,0.005906311,0.00029958613,0.00026174338,0.0004843814,0.4753603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601173,0.0023513664,0.00010147218,0.00033662422,0.00096022885,0.00023854073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948767,0.004189865,0.00012545247,0.00028011473,0.00041112557,0.000116756164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049233027,0.00043080258,0.00044696292,0.0005844115,0.0030375146,0.0088900775,0.0009958076,0.0056278044,0.011189943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010575647,0.00036422285,0.00038092135,0.00096341426,0.022701131,0.015126053,0.002358904,0.009469794,0.004151226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009326866,0.0000058799633,0.000061029477,0.0001473521,0.0000039455504,0.000083489125,0.005313227,0.00004809925,0.000082502986,0.82581645,0.14275232,0.025676377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005375386,0.000008536409,0.00017377884,0.0008098885,0.0000049448836,0.0003169806,0.0024062914,0.00010428944,0.00021992941,0.48822016,0.50771683,0.000013095148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034867895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004760192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011189943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031066223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03743404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798911260","doi":"10.22230/jem.2013v14n2a550","title":"Social Licence in British Columbia: Some Implications for Energy Development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Stakeholder; Public land; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03152348958817935,"score_gpt":0.2923900465774794,"score_spread":0.26086655698930006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798911260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4374878,0.040661037,0.00055008096,0.23131454,0.0007764905,0.0001557833,0.0013223168,0.00006470523,0.28766733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89447457,0.028535554,0.00068880856,0.013010512,0.00009030929,0.00009809087,0.00050197623,0.000029948396,0.06257032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983222,0.0002671559,0.00003837413,0.00007925717,0.00032784735,0.00096517056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636334,0.0006119288,0.00012866111,0.00006729994,0.0018252762,0.0010035807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011680478,0.000274838,0.0004318809,0.0016527702,0.012407497,0.0066383416,0.002106091,0.001529085,0.008721813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034441198,0.00020476329,0.00034630988,0.00659251,0.005056504,0.0020688826,0.0033428036,0.0030486998,0.0003196994],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016805969,0.0005640792,0.15802671,0.0017307381,0.00008926974,0.008025276,0.07478795,0.0020637214,0.0009193261,0.15517679,0.2750755,0.32337254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025122763,0.000051674473,0.26825982,0.0021541168,0.000059163714,0.0003968605,0.368799,0.001090777,0.0003206383,0.014126443,0.34452784,0.00018846281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11564629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11564629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095065705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83907646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1800409070","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1039","title":"Constitutional Recognition of the Role of the Attoney General in Criminal Prosecutions: Krieger V. Law Society of Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05106941723125123,"score_gpt":0.31780788623837236,"score_spread":0.2667384690071211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1800409070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21737014,0.017059218,0.0024345303,0.1982199,0.0018816333,0.00029956814,0.0007347064,0.0002185157,0.56178176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8850829,0.0033049823,0.0010757736,0.051957466,0.00037294553,0.0000709579,0.00015165485,0.000040114774,0.05794324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99016047,0.000809482,0.00039634068,0.0010508089,0.0034861953,0.0040967055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914614,0.0043767123,0.00034298032,0.00042445437,0.0021290071,0.0012654507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00673876,0.00049469,0.00069402065,0.0021559626,0.018099688,0.0113756275,0.00530599,0.015682252,0.0031346167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014091237,0.0014067428,0.00055112905,0.0029828926,0.015652398,0.0023556207,0.0039227656,0.013883559,0.0003156562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000944743,0.000039501458,0.005111606,0.00010692831,0.000034567594,0.0018179469,0.0099289715,0.0008092665,0.0017314393,0.9224869,0.044778142,0.013060352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003904623,0.00024121453,0.09001404,0.0012320004,0.00071229035,0.0016117863,0.023428738,0.0031835686,0.007279649,0.16645823,0.7044182,0.0010298481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9706734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06918251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06918251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13482937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5019566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803760762","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2015.04.10","title":"The Standard of Proof for Redressing Wrongful Convictions - A Comparative Study with Case Analyses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Internal medicine; Medicine; Cardiology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3794452175175761,"score_gpt":0.5165660732146613,"score_spread":0.1371208556970852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1803760762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8577351,0.016951816,0.014947684,0.0068087596,0.00037083824,0.0012169835,0.00038065642,0.000028182398,0.10155999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424076,0.0016628568,0.002759856,0.00029955967,0.00005485374,0.00026128508,0.00006739234,0.000012336638,0.0006410554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8669714,0.08245427,0.015831972,0.0054453244,0.026020179,0.0032769132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6491669,0.27241704,0.026340954,0.014542527,0.035562046,0.0019704984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10326001,0.00042143103,0.0010420176,0.012412504,0.0063751256,0.008953254,0.002726735,0.0028311952,0.0038479136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30598032,0.0006309115,0.0013149787,0.008922281,0.013682083,0.012893887,0.006787595,0.003405581,0.00037357013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007362841,0.0007938552,0.13298687,0.0028691627,0.00051476585,0.0028885046,0.14128692,0.001393452,0.001082921,0.58041906,0.007450741,0.12757748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021516495,0.0018871845,0.3535465,0.009921488,0.0012669932,0.0055084983,0.35395414,0.005024373,0.0052449093,0.15366097,0.109301545,0.0004682793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007887893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009840234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10326001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017067494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074716676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54609764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815604866","doi":"","title":"Unreasonable Interpretations of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Statutory interpretation; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Tribunal; Administrative law; Judicial deference; Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Discretion; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014297814811347943,"score_gpt":0.30914821541209275,"score_spread":0.2948504006007448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815604866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02192705,0.009898626,0.1530976,0.09584891,0.003173435,0.0002219369,0.00024306244,0.00042652318,0.7151628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89497864,0.0037006447,0.041647594,0.020111803,0.0025745924,0.0003538581,0.00025453485,0.000253281,0.03612509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9035716,0.03700173,0.005554858,0.009762519,0.03813733,0.0059719463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95630836,0.01831817,0.0033543399,0.009929159,0.010768891,0.0013210761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03944604,0.0013598838,0.0015293806,0.0039759236,0.00846562,0.021345297,0.004796116,0.008261044,0.0055921865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06253792,0.00085436925,0.0014298359,0.0020297214,0.08285117,0.011281928,0.010310786,0.0131566245,0.001418291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028890706,0.0000035290782,0.000054417393,0.000017878827,0.0000044173044,0.000052918884,0.0016718529,0.00011166789,0.000037957958,0.99411327,0.0015163606,0.0024127916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040304526,0.0000038534035,0.000055071767,0.000091007096,0.0000064169853,0.000043856315,0.00057195936,0.0003009018,0.000099209945,0.9717924,0.027016629,0.000014667657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024503918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022794291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03944604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021265011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02714968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2086131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823843837","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Independence for Administrative Bodies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Mandate; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Politics; Law; Administrative law; Legislature; Accountability; Separation of powers; Commission; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06059992443973244,"score_gpt":0.3610446900196423,"score_spread":0.30044476557990984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1823843837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07599782,0.0056181517,0.021047164,0.19988616,0.0010930413,0.00007556178,0.00016002213,0.00013633899,0.69598573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90394914,0.0030970648,0.0041562207,0.019357672,0.0006703956,0.000060199898,0.00011304979,0.00013780118,0.06845855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97695357,0.0034261746,0.0004951443,0.0027093068,0.008691864,0.0077238795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98553354,0.004000888,0.0010601233,0.0016345221,0.0044548875,0.0033161158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010703584,0.00047466464,0.00061632093,0.0018062923,0.039987605,0.020263696,0.0022923935,0.0054056817,0.0065066763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01821188,0.00093746337,0.000846254,0.0022659935,0.054778427,0.010060581,0.009035394,0.013969082,0.0012346661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011328656,0.000007379294,0.0010135273,0.000014918189,0.0000071100103,0.00007136998,0.0059590125,0.00015608183,0.00007512236,0.9740675,0.009488304,0.00912836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048336053,0.000025390473,0.009802409,0.00038695527,0.00006019042,0.00020505114,0.01610979,0.00078863703,0.0004966397,0.3258378,0.646115,0.00012381264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.797018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7974804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.797018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056734998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11521061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41164315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824540343","doi":"","title":"Prosecutorial Independence and Accountability in Terrorism Prosecutions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Cabinet (room); Accountability; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Convention; Discretion; Legislature; Supreme court","score_opus":0.012075812730335452,"score_gpt":0.3197479915505157,"score_spread":0.3076721788201802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824540343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22430184,0.009103651,0.034769017,0.24140856,0.001289765,0.00018783363,0.00016567868,0.00013025965,0.4886434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98541844,0.0006705753,0.0016884932,0.006133233,0.0004907288,0.00005546769,0.00001920396,0.000021795082,0.0055021504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.930837,0.031297386,0.003731977,0.004697095,0.017158631,0.012277922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88586813,0.069886416,0.01808561,0.0071391556,0.011207043,0.007813621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043489672,0.00029362048,0.0006613296,0.002449545,0.013198853,0.011832162,0.0019665875,0.007540315,0.0022213736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12658755,0.00075145706,0.00056357647,0.0019503041,0.03334068,0.008474618,0.009926221,0.011823161,0.00042758454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006109543,0.00003684377,0.010061097,0.000058671692,0.000021974669,0.00044901422,0.010696747,0.000740097,0.00024772433,0.9512974,0.0065864343,0.019742962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015804337,0.0001419789,0.05100835,0.00088128675,0.00011701029,0.0009016629,0.009931833,0.0032065716,0.0018185122,0.79676086,0.1348668,0.00020706664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083035894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07694068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083035894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014820505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03543117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22999817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824946498","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130904.2572","title":"Feasibility of the Application of Common Law Double Tier Model in China from the Burden of Proof Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Perspective (graphical); Constitution; Law; China; Proof of concept; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.041315491627256506,"score_gpt":0.3338449230779411,"score_spread":0.2925294314506846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824946498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58391273,0.0012058858,0.11323915,0.023676526,0.0003538292,0.0010065133,0.0007441095,0.00021396107,0.2756473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97851163,0.0001916289,0.00526594,0.0005513066,0.000061993305,0.00013083294,0.00006758741,0.000015171699,0.01520392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941975,0.0016195215,0.00026419753,0.0010561916,0.0013892886,0.001473293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330914,0.002306851,0.000833652,0.0010274402,0.0019409339,0.0005820145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074396,0.00040554575,0.0010029873,0.0018889336,0.003238779,0.0046218317,0.0024648132,0.0026451855,0.014289092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013367877,0.00038803706,0.0012832731,0.0013102818,0.0031003393,0.0054490813,0.0030210256,0.0025229778,0.0005914447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000905524,0.000091115566,0.013180236,0.00008445421,0.00006999683,0.0009768124,0.0009004394,0.00936217,0.00037531782,0.95530295,0.004523277,0.015042737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022441616,0.00018614621,0.025125608,0.00015467292,0.00023104074,0.00068762957,0.0018276947,0.17491256,0.0009045719,0.7651034,0.030518344,0.00012387955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097404696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087264836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097404696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008839493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140040815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19367546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826707174","doi":"10.7202/1032675ar","title":"Propriété intellectuelle, Cour suprême du Canada et droit civil","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04597333529863941,"score_gpt":0.2884160321260291,"score_spread":0.24244269682738973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826707174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042678274,0.0057000592,0.003322945,0.021015273,0.00033162744,0.00003219169,0.00027107872,0.000054309567,0.9265944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83138883,0.0039053888,0.001554536,0.003781244,0.00020607859,0.000042360967,0.00016092515,0.00007287301,0.15888773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518013,0.0007338518,0.000091590955,0.0005106702,0.0021567212,0.0013269742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973195,0.00065206224,0.00023230002,0.00016589864,0.0010746296,0.00055552606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847492,0.000468239,0.00039333742,0.0021876884,0.019440603,0.015445638,0.0010803909,0.0023613113,0.012755445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004279873,0.0002769064,0.00038681753,0.003453975,0.02825608,0.003807206,0.004643241,0.00456187,0.0007647977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009383309,0.0000050553253,0.0013439361,0.00002610064,0.000005936315,0.000096156204,0.007077522,0.00012603216,0.00008573967,0.97645694,0.0066753053,0.008091969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001732731,0.000024724119,0.024287988,0.00052013865,0.00003188661,0.00023618496,0.024953242,0.00062857184,0.00054157706,0.18000494,0.7686357,0.00011769912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8991708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9387506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06839606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07122446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4962505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1844365475","doi":"","title":"Wolfenden in Canada: within and beyond official discoursein law reform struggles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03621148058030124,"score_gpt":0.28091988510024996,"score_spread":0.2447084045199487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1844365475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08000678,0.015351368,0.0020946637,0.10711885,0.00075839245,0.00009966366,0.00030527776,0.000111036614,0.79415405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7533035,0.0067131496,0.001213841,0.008306399,0.00012785559,0.00007810215,0.00012366263,0.00018002487,0.22995336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909781,0.0014099763,0.00016768147,0.00073721574,0.002992684,0.0037143994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359196,0.0021256786,0.00030041925,0.00033970468,0.0023985903,0.0012435962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00450823,0.0007639964,0.0008774695,0.0041724886,0.045659017,0.025267493,0.0043340935,0.008192597,0.015604692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018520767,0.000563858,0.00037006295,0.009337514,0.032714937,0.008225884,0.006666538,0.009270374,0.0007365963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015877558,0.00001836259,0.00096793595,0.000044936958,0.0000073687534,0.00021663914,0.071567416,0.00017512878,0.00007767513,0.8588783,0.042932566,0.025097838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001595906,0.000012633713,0.004547547,0.000500475,0.000026855629,0.00012165416,0.13717495,0.00055085233,0.000429409,0.09502456,0.76149505,0.000100130215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99281526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20239083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20239083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3327282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92511356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853133962","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Canadian Legislation and Case Law: Federal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5680596685653162,"score_gpt":0.5417391408534766,"score_spread":0.02632052771183957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853133962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014855398,0.044075422,0.0049008024,0.0625209,0.0077220243,0.0027814736,0.077217184,0.00203117,0.7972655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010022628,0.061209105,0.018061819,0.006678528,0.0011459695,0.0021559745,0.029805332,0.0011777527,0.8697429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819989,0.002027045,0.001362669,0.0011658967,0.012235097,0.0012104409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.909918,0.017522492,0.0014014189,0.0032958498,0.06538241,0.0024797062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636184,0.0021375755,0.0022438702,0.021762844,0.012084447,0.018112132,0.005032872,0.006596983,0.27864677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06950825,0.0021935857,0.0013863081,0.039466996,0.005794986,0.007499698,0.0026724965,0.005644686,0.07120935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009502666,0.000020041143,0.00017192942,0.00062231644,0.00000351149,0.000014224899,0.00037133283,0.00011616321,0.000050218077,0.014722609,0.94100386,0.0428943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017842654,0.000006512536,0.0019898925,0.001587998,0.000015891108,0.00001990084,0.0007765871,0.00013761652,0.00016408255,0.0039859875,0.9912669,0.00003088408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9616237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97019804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27864677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103700034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28295857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9321663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853219717","doi":"10.4000/books.pur.16181","title":"Justice pénale et justice civile : réflexion sur l’indemnisation des victimes de violence sexuelle et conjugale au Québec","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses universitaires de Rennes eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05685297279825729,"score_gpt":0.2871953130655702,"score_spread":0.23034234026731293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853219717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0631464,0.19760881,0.0018852281,0.20969714,0.0036836336,0.00008035868,0.00038294526,0.000044133234,0.52347136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7062612,0.08021666,0.00093061733,0.015653053,0.00077527855,0.00005241169,0.00018950703,0.00003419466,0.19588703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985422,0.00032541112,0.000030244724,0.000084815336,0.0005512175,0.00046616598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755836,0.0007586884,0.0001461099,0.00006115166,0.0011387047,0.00033686875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014519023,0.00032134404,0.00024215039,0.0021048046,0.00655932,0.0047357935,0.0011447361,0.002310572,0.0053750025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039639776,0.00019468408,0.00017785754,0.0027917842,0.0097359065,0.001373312,0.0013456509,0.0022610442,0.00033047897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037044258,0.00005555589,0.014021883,0.00051665085,0.000027395123,0.00089082366,0.048150588,0.00074230536,0.0004729448,0.4882108,0.27454168,0.17233227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135113105,0.000026380523,0.053645123,0.0011878783,0.000029959801,0.00035997792,0.02595226,0.0004894994,0.0002334916,0.014468251,0.90354824,0.00004542077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9855962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99423134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047592267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047592267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07595724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3453077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853419240","doi":"","title":"A New Conception of Wilful Blindness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sansregret","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Blindness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04023229177587528,"score_gpt":0.33328394300831143,"score_spread":0.29305165123243615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853419240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11996753,0.010577581,0.020189583,0.17871289,0.0011696601,0.00017212715,0.0002920984,0.000113260736,0.6688053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602961,0.001394679,0.0026994715,0.01077284,0.00019133423,0.000029195733,0.000029150357,0.000025488393,0.024561744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927545,0.0013564382,0.00014698287,0.00064874336,0.0031338227,0.0019594894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686,0.0011019458,0.00014393247,0.00021010944,0.0012234562,0.00046063305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054308516,0.00044945595,0.00058750884,0.0025720594,0.014764224,0.013089731,0.002465486,0.0070489775,0.002809568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010874919,0.000382449,0.0005994467,0.0017857943,0.041673984,0.0056074355,0.004324128,0.008394052,0.00014891713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008603437,0.0000043648606,0.00033928358,0.000010274738,0.000003968706,0.00013920778,0.0029247408,0.00031636428,0.000071021765,0.9895517,0.003332408,0.0032980726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035026846,0.000025071262,0.0030511362,0.00023591511,0.000033002038,0.00021502246,0.006992254,0.0021433018,0.00043658284,0.82898164,0.15771943,0.00013151947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93631667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.959418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08605994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08605994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11103554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6244115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185378576","doi":"10.71781/23658","title":"Analyse des bornes extrêmes et le contrôle des armes à feu : l’effet de la Loi C-68 sur les homicides au Québec","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.06971092080218569,"score_gpt":0.38573603259340355,"score_spread":0.31602511179121784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185378576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96060234,0.0036930752,0.012444259,0.0023081678,0.00013748709,0.0007339428,0.004179809,0.000117478776,0.015783455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97702605,0.0010732694,0.005375106,0.0003368742,0.000046131987,0.0005808794,0.0012744571,0.000022935006,0.014264254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973636,0.0010832552,0.00010547064,0.0004152488,0.0006734261,0.0003589387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914328,0.005101302,0.0014225405,0.00039840545,0.0013523436,0.00029263474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004468887,0.0008049561,0.0008013433,0.00094983325,0.00092910294,0.0012628441,0.0012446264,0.0008762238,0.00829949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011196388,0.00027202698,0.0013605484,0.0015789444,0.0011019213,0.0005611075,0.001054692,0.0017938125,0.00053184846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024076868,0.0010346364,0.7334982,0.0012622019,0.0027201388,0.000534651,0.004316444,0.06293964,0.003083319,0.011704862,0.007384833,0.16911344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023197786,0.002879216,0.9316815,0.0006712764,0.0014801747,0.00007785134,0.0034615584,0.033317037,0.0024989992,0.0035262567,0.020062303,0.0001117312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6950841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6660154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3049159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008245974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006644395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6134232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860163611","doi":"10.7202/1032677ar","title":"Le Tribunal des droits de la personne devant la Cour d’appel du Québec : appel à plus de déférence","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03809411854686967,"score_gpt":0.30329950606908723,"score_spread":0.26520538752221756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860163611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2391505,0.0056700483,0.003299023,0.041590914,0.0006698196,0.00010925264,0.00032374874,0.000066439345,0.7091202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7672545,0.0011017502,0.00069474685,0.0045564803,0.000070232585,0.00003785116,0.00008414835,0.000032636213,0.22616765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741274,0.0003804936,0.000056804845,0.00029078324,0.0006982309,0.0011609305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744475,0.0002431501,0.00010238813,0.00014328533,0.0012801512,0.0007862916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013351281,0.00026743105,0.00030408028,0.00083104504,0.018498462,0.0069383853,0.001332664,0.002352088,0.011741844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034446828,0.00020783077,0.00032441728,0.0010072126,0.008956783,0.0012784634,0.002075977,0.0033577175,0.0006916819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007424726,0.00003873321,0.016812403,0.00013249341,0.000035681413,0.0015685009,0.0937605,0.00059674913,0.0014557871,0.763445,0.07441652,0.04766337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022830425,0.000058374528,0.060705785,0.00052108546,0.000044904034,0.00039437303,0.055577476,0.00077801314,0.0005582402,0.016654596,0.8645812,0.000103056875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.982757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053286374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053286374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07543364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38662153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1862935854","doi":"","title":"Damages as a Remedy Against Administrative Authorities: An Area Needing Clarification","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Administrative law; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.06673185567348285,"score_gpt":0.384419086557641,"score_spread":0.3176872308841582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1862935854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006196241,0.07460047,0.012325082,0.8601604,0.0022302393,0.00013117917,0.00020760934,0.000076415716,0.0440724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45643246,0.18192706,0.04244239,0.25669974,0.021016393,0.00048743558,0.0002466015,0.000269587,0.040478278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9569471,0.0139328735,0.004342197,0.0033599334,0.016695363,0.004722472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87861264,0.075767145,0.005360419,0.003526162,0.03335823,0.0033753633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037200008,0.0012729112,0.0041560326,0.0057960167,0.009711567,0.03930271,0.008900012,0.028838562,0.011842084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072737046,0.0009269896,0.0021016651,0.0042357347,0.03461607,0.050349917,0.008771705,0.02971817,0.0013100654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005515101,0.00011879945,0.0021430305,0.0013495258,0.000083050385,0.00083524134,0.0052762204,0.0020064937,0.00045667452,0.8701034,0.046652656,0.07091967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005306696,0.000078151184,0.004040864,0.006210251,0.00011517987,0.00085584825,0.032015808,0.0022091551,0.00062896666,0.58792466,0.3655578,0.00031039753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23033108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32494533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23033108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03690178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45798075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866902775","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1085","title":"Knowledge is Power: The Criminal Law, Openness and Privacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Jurisprudence; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Openness to experience; Separation of powers; State police; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Computer science; Law enforcement; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.07694085382770983,"score_gpt":0.3821765624806582,"score_spread":0.30523570865294836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866902775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024145838,0.01574778,0.020979205,0.2351456,0.0007447687,0.00007200426,0.00013849263,0.00005775148,0.70296866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94272304,0.0051434026,0.0031032634,0.020167433,0.0010184238,0.000148994,0.000049257193,0.000047209807,0.027598944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877109,0.0059796325,0.00036330838,0.0013564175,0.0026190304,0.001970659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882206,0.008045523,0.00073923747,0.0013340637,0.00088067155,0.0007799405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007855146,0.0005239195,0.0008142553,0.0019558587,0.013351077,0.020789905,0.0020433743,0.0120661985,0.0047542998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015226941,0.00048604986,0.00065744994,0.0024017377,0.14675078,0.023109697,0.010590231,0.011936159,0.0006486665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019917802,0.0000026535006,0.00005293667,0.0000059019953,0.0000010826251,0.000030737392,0.0014438871,0.000044377277,0.0000073854567,0.9957237,0.0014856519,0.001199765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046878645,0.0000032822118,0.00011123277,0.00007567908,0.0000019888341,0.00006446026,0.0013077066,0.00012964147,0.000027699805,0.9746197,0.023647603,0.000006392975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040653016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021297513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040653016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013094019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014520731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0950042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868689271","doi":"10.21991/c9737t","title":"Canada, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and Universal Periodic Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Mandate; International human rights law; Commission; Fundamental rights; Law; Promotion (chess); Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07843411927388214,"score_gpt":0.28236564935882386,"score_spread":0.20393153008494172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868689271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026674822,0.15452164,0.002637747,0.563187,0.05394436,0.0036652302,0.015063954,0.00052646094,0.20378609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043739114,0.13756959,0.021253271,0.44842172,0.021668816,0.0072868704,0.011925042,0.0006249825,0.30751058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90970856,0.010722675,0.008558872,0.002731771,0.06170022,0.0065779947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5865097,0.06036923,0.013832358,0.015780794,0.30563354,0.017874368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07804838,0.0011379226,0.0032675548,0.017379344,0.008182939,0.009971776,0.006614666,0.020295419,0.0139001245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2376086,0.0023125813,0.0023986711,0.013700808,0.006877668,0.004062487,0.0036888027,0.0140965665,0.0033602223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005486418,0.000032997446,0.0006038541,0.001184929,0.000050932184,0.00008284252,0.00015451801,0.0001161045,0.00007435905,0.012897086,0.96164113,0.023106279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008674387,0.000021599342,0.005510323,0.005169873,0.00019032425,0.000061995,0.00016865735,0.00015019705,0.00017891864,0.005483543,0.98290145,0.000076418444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78137904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83678967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21862096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053115267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42064404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4398169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877220609","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1934392","title":"The Unfortunate Triumph of Form Over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science","score_opus":0.049987463537957195,"score_gpt":0.3217108380000008,"score_spread":0.2717233744620436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877220609","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11704381,0.008418391,0.006399042,0.588195,0.0022803943,0.000096760494,0.0008296436,0.00015344514,0.27658352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095937,0.0036414026,0.0043272264,0.036759675,0.00050796283,0.00004202167,0.00011706666,0.00018771266,0.04482321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98297113,0.002279518,0.0005953483,0.001475052,0.009878516,0.002800284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96389383,0.009277201,0.0016109755,0.0020564976,0.01850832,0.0046531754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014675785,0.0004070728,0.0007572439,0.0053303367,0.029394234,0.013715306,0.0030144076,0.0052144756,0.0093022445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054723002,0.0009008637,0.0009153294,0.00887903,0.023393486,0.006198254,0.0055047534,0.0088611385,0.00046968178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008345683,0.000020002397,0.010983833,0.00015311474,0.00003333003,0.00018447687,0.01592279,0.00039666306,0.00039896814,0.80943084,0.084689595,0.07770291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072808194,0.000090808586,0.08215915,0.0010596132,0.00013924601,0.00043442953,0.03626515,0.0017223316,0.0010732453,0.16641252,0.71026176,0.00030891088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98769474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99667263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09886425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09886425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13839816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7173137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878148134","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1129","title":"Aboriginal Over-representation and R. v. Gladue: Where We Were, Where We Are and Where We Might Be Going","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Representation (politics); Supreme court; Political science; Law; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.05892869499764502,"score_gpt":0.36327674237386415,"score_spread":0.3043480473762191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878148134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20937847,0.2794949,0.0006646357,0.3107805,0.0017936464,0.000048378155,0.00024658465,0.000018284238,0.19757468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83198446,0.087928906,0.0004984176,0.057445966,0.0007388557,0.000026458982,0.000093742645,0.000014350804,0.021268819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931322,0.0024894108,0.00022270711,0.00046007612,0.0022743936,0.0014212568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99065137,0.004698761,0.0017607067,0.00022982643,0.0017739102,0.0008854787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007904348,0.00015848789,0.0005152011,0.0015354047,0.005770923,0.0040931515,0.0011933573,0.003874513,0.0024262746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023769071,0.00022109594,0.000453614,0.0019331328,0.0065330635,0.0019319179,0.0022697935,0.0054377536,0.00024079044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002513155,0.000088052395,0.065259576,0.0024851651,0.00023943708,0.005202497,0.075697094,0.00033025118,0.00056095223,0.5520431,0.12818457,0.169658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007443738,0.0003111509,0.17323533,0.011442067,0.00048540335,0.0041440306,0.088884,0.00022500448,0.0012212613,0.05587803,0.66389537,0.00020391846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5087226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73165506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4912774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009819085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025474733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884302434","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries' Engagement with the Fair Cross Section Right: Aboriginal Underrepresentation on Ontario Juries and the Boston Marathon Bomber's Jury Wheel Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.05628836377254533,"score_gpt":0.38336543852948407,"score_spread":0.32707707475693876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1884302434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21127184,0.009939762,0.0010691086,0.50274193,0.0011920987,0.0000666343,0.00021224274,0.00002538824,0.27348098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966466,0.0056249956,0.00079329644,0.04142433,0.00042273125,0.00006437345,0.00006917021,0.000038341943,0.05491612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948532,0.0014953574,0.00013969542,0.0003663825,0.0015389236,0.0016064476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557745,0.0019097682,0.00034270476,0.00019386654,0.0011269083,0.0008493356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050552427,0.0002283686,0.00029842468,0.0012166441,0.037960645,0.009473029,0.0015379128,0.005019835,0.0037543168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011713863,0.00031957476,0.00032645508,0.001965246,0.018803451,0.0027215108,0.0051988913,0.006781923,0.00023336026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116314994,0.00003337926,0.017092727,0.00012867163,0.00003544769,0.002437946,0.22649729,0.00031099853,0.0007110216,0.6196053,0.1057684,0.027262546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004748217,0.000040461455,0.048224553,0.00043269497,0.000059010014,0.0003145297,0.27269945,0.00030041556,0.0006693796,0.027992278,0.64903605,0.0001836647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99055684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08123676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07815112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5894167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188455200","doi":"","title":"The Rise and Spread of the Special Advocate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.01747033424007563,"score_gpt":0.27840009135303956,"score_spread":0.26092975711296396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188455200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13047756,0.031411663,0.123849906,0.3833502,0.0046679275,0.00021868905,0.000045163695,0.00019974225,0.32577914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91315836,0.006039131,0.021989428,0.03368935,0.0013696464,0.00019335063,0.000014603802,0.00013746826,0.023408728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95549804,0.023817578,0.001554408,0.0054725446,0.010796036,0.0028612853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9030274,0.068926774,0.005736439,0.0075728293,0.010950728,0.0037858533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052988824,0.00026995747,0.00080387556,0.001992759,0.012068495,0.0090069985,0.0018551685,0.01094195,0.002298277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11079655,0.0007593734,0.00075785385,0.0013487712,0.04577189,0.011388348,0.0101545295,0.018699437,0.0004946789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014263714,0.000008436292,0.0007338586,0.000029232764,0.0000033672045,0.00012729404,0.009359844,0.00006043581,0.00015076961,0.9703648,0.0027680509,0.016379645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004419499,0.0001667674,0.0030488202,0.0008897429,0.00003508332,0.0011512615,0.00756753,0.00093007577,0.0013003648,0.2800865,0.70469135,0.00008832522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013229151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017201165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052988824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009198543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020216227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28023505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888803890","doi":"","title":"Exceptions: The Criminal Law's Illogical Approach to HIV-Related Aggravated Assaults","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Commit; Causation; Deterrence (psychology); Psychology; Sodomy; Conflation; Generalization; Criminology; Criminal law; Fallacy; Due Process Clause; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Homosexuality; Supreme court; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.045935757854532334,"score_gpt":0.3281204472885819,"score_spread":0.28218468943404956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888803890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061717972,0.009772419,0.11052188,0.30760038,0.0067272773,0.00033220186,0.00029732578,0.00031402902,0.5027164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587491,0.0031263065,0.02628427,0.07669919,0.006148737,0.00041842443,0.00010762755,0.00012134162,0.02834501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96943116,0.010301776,0.0020391233,0.004919356,0.010725533,0.0025830555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783368,0.013937848,0.0015001884,0.0025178485,0.0030294075,0.00067794387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017240208,0.0006536984,0.0014177604,0.0039048418,0.009450643,0.011896438,0.004963258,0.018295499,0.0022497836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041708443,0.0006005061,0.0014632285,0.0016081089,0.03331197,0.010855702,0.0073015364,0.02596586,0.0005182333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062589734,0.000012231752,0.00035059237,0.000015369631,0.00000591591,0.00024112688,0.0007902153,0.00053002196,0.000033440723,0.99196494,0.003489619,0.0025603855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020326112,0.000018021972,0.000374954,0.00016405086,0.000018049957,0.00030937494,0.0006541032,0.002034019,0.00011892779,0.9591516,0.037106387,0.000030082934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018246174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011198314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018295499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056145014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009211132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09117603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891044298","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1003","title":"The Impact of Lovelace v. Ontario on Section 15 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Art; History; Geology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05418493241747736,"score_gpt":0.35494021488147326,"score_spread":0.3007552824639959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891044298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06011821,0.005406105,0.0005709103,0.10529763,0.0017351971,0.00014054292,0.00080552796,0.000063961015,0.825862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71128297,0.0054705846,0.00043191668,0.08617648,0.0007981323,0.00007908703,0.00029340084,0.000103514736,0.19536398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902767,0.00085696916,0.00020894295,0.0007751602,0.004633434,0.003248827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902616,0.0032891303,0.0005906879,0.00032843198,0.003689846,0.0018402559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041994634,0.0004402991,0.0004935831,0.0011411553,0.023526,0.008683547,0.0021607422,0.006297641,0.008636989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015124135,0.000696677,0.00085165486,0.0015932826,0.008661811,0.0020465904,0.0022458034,0.007888252,0.0008184068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002654494,0.00008692191,0.021021863,0.00032480885,0.00008958571,0.0034714444,0.014784385,0.00095018256,0.0013172599,0.5061198,0.42773798,0.023830242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014462334,0.00007878076,0.041984644,0.00076123653,0.00025542648,0.00033776026,0.012477227,0.0007368299,0.0017170393,0.015444728,0.9257802,0.00028153267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99023753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99702865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13678351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13678351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15408155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891455159","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120806.2353","title":"Implementation of Respecting and Safeguarding Human Rights Provisions at the Criminal Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of criminal justice; Safeguarding; Criminal justice; Political science; Human rights; Criminal procedure; Law; Criminal code; Criminal justice ethics; China; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09841503542281801,"score_gpt":0.48206651790495214,"score_spread":0.3836514824821341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891455159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19895218,0.004225844,0.099055775,0.12583211,0.00515967,0.008570871,0.001111795,0.0012848193,0.55580693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7834939,0.001976054,0.10700175,0.03632171,0.0007923367,0.0029656233,0.00070573436,0.00011703228,0.06662595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96996397,0.007373271,0.0029904654,0.0021807346,0.012863653,0.0046278867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96570355,0.008174477,0.0038091564,0.0044159605,0.0147232525,0.0031736796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0267569,0.000501944,0.0005756269,0.002730528,0.00575029,0.0040223943,0.0023999026,0.005981473,0.0044593927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04215033,0.00054697285,0.00082453474,0.0013320684,0.0050069005,0.0030084422,0.0052038627,0.0077462005,0.001067407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007267247,0.0008373492,0.030082889,0.0009364292,0.00008527492,0.0012607607,0.017084206,0.001387262,0.012401689,0.6204529,0.077957034,0.23744158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024719225,0.0011811067,0.19596832,0.0027612068,0.00030211394,0.0016630907,0.009162432,0.005806249,0.018022388,0.10620909,0.6580429,0.00063387636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06252583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06410142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06252583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077113314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080624186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14150572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891707747","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1254","title":"The Charter versus the Government’s Crime Agenda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Arbitrariness; Discretion; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Conviction; Deference; Judicial review; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.11234035499142955,"score_gpt":0.3732694735707201,"score_spread":0.2609291185792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891707747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01966894,0.005366605,0.007056455,0.27341697,0.0028630614,0.000073635456,0.00016452878,0.00008066167,0.6913093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8469308,0.004358102,0.00440935,0.072357915,0.0060375785,0.0002802597,0.00020085262,0.00015696094,0.065268174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852706,0.007061346,0.00043994212,0.0014583179,0.003452215,0.0023175417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990511,0.0046651745,0.00091325305,0.0011148307,0.0017799658,0.0010158634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01150566,0.0005702203,0.000663618,0.0025161863,0.009842446,0.01580209,0.0022102746,0.013631373,0.009427977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017903347,0.00045512087,0.00084261026,0.0020604224,0.02304759,0.011580408,0.0051940945,0.014245783,0.00093806064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062804647,0.0000090156755,0.0000637715,0.00000788542,0.0000015470612,0.000022268601,0.0003453355,0.00009350349,0.000017540377,0.9900316,0.00698119,0.0024201002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056446526,0.000066238325,0.0017628659,0.0003040103,0.00002274104,0.00007377336,0.0016831349,0.0008266887,0.00021977386,0.7078051,0.28712904,0.000050231396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024192734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036238894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024192734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011502737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017979667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0834586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896091292","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1199","title":"Remedial Minimalism under Section 24(1) of the Charter: Bjelland, Khadr and Nasogaluak","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Remedial education; Law; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Political science; Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03979245113394108,"score_gpt":0.32204685933855426,"score_spread":0.28225440820461317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896091292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11706079,0.020032639,0.01425264,0.16446972,0.0049797106,0.0005961547,0.0006323156,0.0004651154,0.67751104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634494,0.0038957456,0.008880991,0.058577746,0.0010731957,0.00026703358,0.0001386945,0.0000627243,0.063654445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807344,0.0023781576,0.0009398304,0.0021635292,0.010081731,0.0037023397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925067,0.0031363184,0.0006254633,0.0006033924,0.002549349,0.0005787768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010023331,0.00053518894,0.00080777874,0.001367596,0.010360351,0.010506977,0.0034012238,0.0115218535,0.001804395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023031995,0.00070195633,0.0009008899,0.0010588237,0.015557773,0.0029191999,0.0028575489,0.0135296285,0.00048193513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003883348,0.000027951028,0.0005934931,0.000076830336,0.000014747794,0.00031042247,0.003345088,0.00030303962,0.0006895321,0.95518035,0.030108802,0.009311001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019939747,0.00017207982,0.011423331,0.0010627724,0.0002194385,0.00082195987,0.005076955,0.0015157552,0.0062708086,0.34333044,0.6292922,0.0006149095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45450854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61533886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45450854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027095117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061883043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90372604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897452689","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n3p158","title":"Modernising the Law: Breaches of the Peace &amp; Justices of the Peace","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Magistrate; Legislation; Political science; Economic Justice; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.1130551996794037,"score_gpt":0.3569241526508915,"score_spread":0.2438689529714878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897452689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074397367,0.035748355,0.0024017207,0.35915384,0.0068822233,0.000068453046,0.000079540245,0.00013630584,0.5880899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56564707,0.029857477,0.0039769933,0.14353085,0.0053100027,0.00021362933,0.00011950378,0.0001289234,0.25121558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142575,0.00337807,0.00035334608,0.000658921,0.0028275952,0.0013562837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533844,0.002519271,0.0005679106,0.00037514124,0.00057894376,0.0006203151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058747134,0.00042243075,0.00030506146,0.001625867,0.013437127,0.0114678675,0.0015153635,0.014454474,0.013127373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021902878,0.00038387504,0.0004217823,0.0014077439,0.017912144,0.011276266,0.008593416,0.0151252225,0.0022537163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013478331,0.00004093198,0.0005367966,0.00010404303,0.0000047331714,0.0005188036,0.008206557,0.000068804315,0.00013400795,0.7543134,0.18498056,0.051077846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011913121,0.000033336793,0.0021518732,0.0004546193,0.000005974678,0.00036808153,0.0071812137,0.00008875673,0.0002488933,0.10659718,0.8828375,0.000020619886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016807673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030852173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016807673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007493231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012390895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054367423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897879740","doi":"","title":"L'utilisation de la procédure de l’avis consultatif devant la Cour suprême du Canada : Essai de typologie","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.054620463468527544,"score_gpt":0.38174220310415086,"score_spread":0.3271217396356233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897879740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10093963,0.01693885,0.15606803,0.028435307,0.0014568939,0.0007276682,0.001127456,0.00088428054,0.6934219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8570513,0.0052449377,0.04406081,0.0039831824,0.00042669004,0.00045803277,0.0003386798,0.0003907113,0.08804577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95290345,0.016748674,0.0019368213,0.0039173216,0.019672206,0.004821571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677279,0.016799124,0.0018923461,0.0038126227,0.009013838,0.00075409305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020101897,0.0007683508,0.0008379954,0.0058341334,0.015059439,0.01419914,0.0038380437,0.007207597,0.0051335287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04282239,0.0007539708,0.0009321256,0.0085143335,0.02391711,0.006191312,0.0027634206,0.005944759,0.0014752271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028541894,0.00001724097,0.0019151765,0.00008029407,0.000014285254,0.00036920691,0.018027388,0.00036377247,0.0006871745,0.9296023,0.0095963655,0.0392981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030055066,0.000089064655,0.011017229,0.0007544193,0.00007271486,0.0017537805,0.014628594,0.0037706508,0.0033568477,0.09243436,0.87184477,0.00024750756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73281837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68035984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26718163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031472698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05521921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5375102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897915674","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1083","title":"Search and Seizure in 2004: Dialogue or Dead-End?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Discretion; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Suspect; Constitution; Judicial review; Power (physics); Judicial discretion; Prerogative; Politics","score_opus":0.08796202279381093,"score_gpt":0.38201766065352805,"score_spread":0.2940556378597171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897915674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023421435,0.065777324,0.0045320615,0.4739362,0.0056340056,0.0000938278,0.0006318082,0.00015183061,0.4258215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5092912,0.040890448,0.0019351011,0.272247,0.0022462718,0.00016916619,0.0006088389,0.00021895723,0.17239302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98829585,0.00417743,0.0008568649,0.0010487171,0.00339297,0.0022281667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844563,0.009938611,0.00084223103,0.00086039194,0.0031104966,0.0007919019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008642916,0.0003546931,0.0010872781,0.0027853372,0.008889402,0.012727782,0.002372852,0.011459204,0.007257667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03906659,0.00043961342,0.00050544884,0.0032807323,0.010062733,0.012090449,0.0039487346,0.009972656,0.0012605553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056901794,0.000035220986,0.0015452612,0.00035276535,0.000021030228,0.00077343604,0.019506456,0.0002466662,0.00013892054,0.60041964,0.27967608,0.09722756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013940321,0.000024950501,0.0016452553,0.0008387461,0.000018668465,0.00030488984,0.015865374,0.00013438078,0.00033830173,0.05548137,0.9252908,0.000043260265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27389526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40389714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27389526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018814066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03551505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54460204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900986889","doi":"","title":"Constitutional exclusion under s 35(5) of the Constitution: should an accused bear a 'threshold burden' of proving that his or her constitutional right has been infringed?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.11860843812498421,"score_gpt":0.34083033410066355,"score_spread":0.22222189597567932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900986889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32674876,0.0060133296,0.027182272,0.07176161,0.0014822233,0.00029848117,0.0002102422,0.000093444716,0.5662097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781155,0.0009356301,0.004535895,0.008664693,0.00033174397,0.00012501997,0.000043125427,0.000017412054,0.0072309957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98004067,0.0063565252,0.002106258,0.0020671175,0.0061614104,0.003268084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792782,0.014039349,0.0021308335,0.0016353645,0.0023451063,0.00057115254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01904865,0.00045100183,0.0008318436,0.0018384184,0.0069488115,0.008522029,0.0016698717,0.00970541,0.0034328275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03184343,0.0005420478,0.00088959374,0.001203239,0.03575749,0.0066037024,0.0066162953,0.010046951,0.0005631574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022391587,0.000009920337,0.0008240009,0.00005430148,0.000010911715,0.00039024127,0.0066875145,0.00014771812,0.0007494101,0.9860394,0.00094575394,0.0041184984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008341988,0.00023691067,0.007978313,0.0013542068,0.00016757063,0.0013579988,0.01470478,0.00097450323,0.00315968,0.7607879,0.20897582,0.00021886345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027650906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029313378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027650906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00691791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021516718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100740075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901621180","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1213","title":"Transparency Confined to the Courthouse: A Critical Analysis of Criminal Lawyer's Assn., C.B.C. and National Post","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Democracy; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Section (typography); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.11468649768049417,"score_gpt":0.381161973295792,"score_spread":0.26647547561529783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901621180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19608116,0.06306225,0.010651837,0.38018808,0.0019283056,0.0003441309,0.00016241996,0.000038329774,0.34754342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645309,0.005877543,0.0009847288,0.019959673,0.0004168921,0.0001007601,0.000018012923,0.000029433586,0.008082011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852631,0.008224345,0.0002972494,0.0008526305,0.0027891884,0.0025734985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675968,0.027179942,0.0010205102,0.0005149098,0.0030700916,0.0006177333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016049609,0.00045609474,0.00062694395,0.0038267772,0.024970269,0.016094837,0.0019961512,0.00999812,0.0017381915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031754714,0.0005962381,0.0007460976,0.003075456,0.043085206,0.010853782,0.003522183,0.012702127,0.00014587941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028630639,0.00001714172,0.00040370924,0.00010272651,0.000013219289,0.0007549262,0.12041124,0.00016202491,0.00014459527,0.8564848,0.016081354,0.0053956383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006169715,0.00006186726,0.005165815,0.0024595242,0.00008392301,0.00032448108,0.22581667,0.0008123558,0.0012400326,0.5086491,0.25519243,0.00013207074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1563324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24818872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1563324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033895317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026201788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3108449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911534773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2024942","title":"Criminal Justice in America: Constitutionalization Without Foundation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.03545949680480907,"score_gpt":0.3539532693929335,"score_spread":0.3184937725881244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911534773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06174138,0.013854234,0.009491088,0.4849245,0.0040781763,0.0002655682,0.0012633554,0.00024338992,0.4241384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88402474,0.0035311666,0.0048026196,0.06992063,0.003998753,0.00045877002,0.0004907387,0.00013206227,0.03264044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98377454,0.0046194005,0.0008432964,0.0032472129,0.0031989447,0.004316611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98336744,0.0077541065,0.0012237836,0.0019637283,0.003627715,0.002063313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019317968,0.0006792817,0.0015638735,0.0030420823,0.014261058,0.019380465,0.004267367,0.016067548,0.0058757546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030982861,0.0011931406,0.00091771607,0.0032411166,0.03679333,0.011077277,0.0072436226,0.023254832,0.0005556414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015508054,0.00004589511,0.000488505,0.000027831004,0.000014493414,0.000025615269,0.0005141148,0.00018118591,0.000078518955,0.97876066,0.014184455,0.0056632482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007605291,0.00006688279,0.0061343764,0.00036740626,0.0000838735,0.000064718966,0.0019824752,0.00085119397,0.0004105027,0.8284949,0.16135268,0.000115049894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11641386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17015356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11641386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014558136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043165527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23147249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915707574","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1101","title":"Has Everything Been Decided?: Certainty, the Charter and Criminal Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Legal certainty; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.075023956811721,"score_gpt":0.340254609789666,"score_spread":0.265230652977945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915707574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118763715,0.09618953,0.11114209,0.29218677,0.0025659993,0.00013274956,0.00040614183,0.00015172771,0.37846136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730085,0.008467356,0.004625723,0.006570516,0.0009908536,0.000051133884,0.00003673501,0.000027226914,0.0062220735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955695,0.0024914714,0.00020847787,0.0004034456,0.0009697392,0.0003572585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935765,0.008066281,0.0013253991,0.0005344844,0.00051350077,0.00020272321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007605581,0.00042310683,0.00061467255,0.0027072087,0.0026373786,0.0099448515,0.0011127489,0.0044961744,0.0041073794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019291984,0.00037757942,0.0004874151,0.002915768,0.03743933,0.018930651,0.002679845,0.0048814733,0.00025460534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001713963,0.000008876621,0.0002341976,0.000035063484,0.0000035916887,0.000028109782,0.0009831393,0.00022470579,0.000016084956,0.9898024,0.0017985345,0.006848142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023859828,0.000028103854,0.00064043025,0.00012276557,0.000012271122,0.000056596688,0.0007695732,0.0005917849,0.00008056824,0.97709686,0.020556716,0.00002057803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013958033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008664575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013958033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004085149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035037682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040222645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916008992","doi":"","title":"Seeking access to the confidential records of a third party: the accused's right to a fair trial v the third party's right to privacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Right to privacy; Conviction; Constitutional right; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Law; Third party; Information privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to a fair trial; Public disclosure; Internet privacy; Human rights; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.10869781096703321,"score_gpt":0.38302469648797116,"score_spread":0.274326885520938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916008992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20858046,0.008858027,0.013666192,0.1876368,0.0010520337,0.00019493561,0.00016173143,0.00006301249,0.5797869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545757,0.0016945415,0.0013531268,0.022644138,0.00043025086,0.00010908823,0.000017544802,0.000020281139,0.01915538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873466,0.0052597844,0.000658262,0.001074901,0.0025888144,0.0030715796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750469,0.020220028,0.00133932,0.0012672447,0.0014503172,0.0006762429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015855953,0.00038414408,0.00096127973,0.0011594275,0.009409247,0.010669409,0.0018753454,0.023484055,0.0036771114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03691733,0.0005868968,0.0010095581,0.0011105118,0.026454678,0.0067124576,0.006144078,0.015504863,0.0004609544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036401027,0.00002040001,0.00066086143,0.000029927765,0.000014472962,0.000724416,0.004151344,0.0001362303,0.00027316733,0.9891411,0.0025414196,0.0022702299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019233335,0.00017875404,0.0033992026,0.0007692858,0.0002734847,0.0021172706,0.0092686955,0.0016685219,0.0037420783,0.86481714,0.1133974,0.00017579652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027504131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025427904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027504131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005154361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009236681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08385527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191862960","doi":"","title":"Legal Professional Privilege: Is It Absolute?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Subject (documents); Warrant; Privilege (computing); Proportionality (law); Officer; High Court; Suspect; Covert; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.026271096108404373,"score_gpt":0.2822127217620872,"score_spread":0.25594162565368284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191862960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045009915,0.015417384,0.01524522,0.53106767,0.0020680313,0.000044505727,0.00011897351,0.00007323659,0.39095512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107542,0.004299596,0.001980357,0.06341373,0.0020010257,0.00004574648,0.000042519034,0.000041491086,0.017421285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811569,0.0043632966,0.00092307536,0.0029876141,0.0067247963,0.0038443285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842897,0.008150784,0.0014405701,0.0014432868,0.0028530569,0.0018226966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014286298,0.0002848298,0.001020562,0.0013162994,0.0082676755,0.013305008,0.002429646,0.012187466,0.0063460344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040647708,0.0004953473,0.0005726161,0.0010152101,0.05851817,0.01774219,0.0064584357,0.01416207,0.0008738433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008829493,0.000013538563,0.0009299764,0.000058438676,0.000005744064,0.00016593878,0.0043146913,0.00002840974,0.00015707368,0.9714507,0.0066809873,0.01618564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025923946,0.000058662587,0.0057141623,0.0010638081,0.000034401568,0.00086960057,0.011647217,0.00021809207,0.0005385921,0.7933099,0.18642485,0.000094831645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061763123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07395633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061763123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010502407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021454012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122807205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920161452","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1230","title":"The Charter Balance against Unscrupulous Law and Order Politics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Politics; Political science; Redress; Imprisonment","score_opus":0.04140664533343985,"score_gpt":0.3352833756062549,"score_spread":0.293876730272815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920161452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035876464,0.008900022,0.04833565,0.48962483,0.0039992775,0.0001527046,0.000095890384,0.00036800685,0.4126472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8683436,0.002334013,0.0122782495,0.0690109,0.004080777,0.00021874998,0.000046860994,0.00019507993,0.04349183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96553403,0.013378482,0.0011978545,0.0043135905,0.011778202,0.0037978464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698206,0.016672121,0.0031589165,0.0044731814,0.003713777,0.0021613014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031916115,0.00044010737,0.00089693285,0.002240494,0.012578598,0.027765442,0.0023441769,0.012647598,0.0054307333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0454574,0.00062139047,0.0007487829,0.0016421316,0.06578897,0.017303418,0.006596046,0.016837934,0.0011329277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052561377,0.000004888571,0.000059351096,0.000006221694,0.0000012346883,0.000010928112,0.000723737,0.00008504352,0.000028506422,0.9940123,0.0029461256,0.0021164045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005091466,0.000038767866,0.00042288084,0.0001560469,0.000010125662,0.000032982884,0.0012775998,0.0005691705,0.0002866312,0.8789593,0.11815896,0.000036589103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01497919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02033631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031916115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01839932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024991315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16879052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923440742","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1112","title":"The Impact of the Charter on the Law of Search and Seizure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitutionality; Constitutional law; Constitution; Parliament; Expectation of privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10079378572812524,"score_gpt":0.3801849063068127,"score_spread":0.2793911205786874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923440742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024926417,0.010990514,0.015420598,0.047327105,0.0010178582,0.00012794834,0.00029310273,0.00015998165,0.8997365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470304,0.014996513,0.008548248,0.019696124,0.0014594956,0.00014006048,0.00017112408,0.0001764161,0.10778163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792054,0.0027144328,0.00043664384,0.0012874006,0.0129341725,0.0034218682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858752,0.00756066,0.0006306264,0.0008295367,0.004371543,0.00073238404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008949286,0.0005038285,0.0006925381,0.00306522,0.010748687,0.012901106,0.0017386061,0.0037398485,0.0056089247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020957524,0.0005579154,0.0009858514,0.0026201073,0.03224181,0.006129043,0.003647723,0.009239788,0.0004311705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072420185,0.0000032497278,0.00012832084,0.000012318993,0.0000017681342,0.00004738865,0.0005257841,0.00046834143,0.000062873834,0.99110466,0.0030590112,0.0045789722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004939663,0.0000749976,0.0059052017,0.00046587634,0.00004857777,0.00013882724,0.0013208052,0.003673742,0.0011052202,0.4055215,0.58145654,0.00023938919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90574557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87422097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094254434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077501565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09510304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5623158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W192887305","doi":"","title":"The Charter in the Administrative Process: Statutory Remedy or Refounding of Administrative Jurisdiction?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Administrative law; Statutory law","score_opus":0.15176508418999007,"score_gpt":0.42895055652382563,"score_spread":0.27718547233383556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W192887305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034593545,0.012256069,0.0251351,0.2878387,0.004092783,0.00010369925,0.000120237724,0.0002306398,0.63562924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8333325,0.0035721213,0.005142018,0.038334183,0.0017316148,0.000097722885,0.00007343745,0.0001354474,0.11758093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849214,0.004893518,0.00047943878,0.0016107128,0.0038400432,0.0042549246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903965,0.0049318294,0.0007689502,0.0010974681,0.002239341,0.00056595274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010233064,0.0003715673,0.00051444146,0.0011087968,0.009533938,0.016054023,0.0025621026,0.0086190635,0.0044541885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022624087,0.00043932293,0.0005143348,0.001194874,0.04066013,0.009464799,0.0035168435,0.010465006,0.0009230773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005045817,0.000005008852,0.00011371104,0.000011770699,0.0000011404586,0.000052224957,0.0020458093,0.000078157376,0.00005617114,0.9879709,0.006834929,0.0028251198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059151538,0.00004233708,0.0021210362,0.00050862937,0.000026012642,0.0001501143,0.009513555,0.0011337745,0.0009219579,0.5446376,0.44080192,0.0000839403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31983578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30484578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31983578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024865974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03758684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6359483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932693296","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110702.006","title":"Resolution to Conflict of Competency of Evidence: The Analysis Based on Legal Culture and Litigant system/RÉSOLUTION DES CONFLITS DE COMPÉTENCE DE LA PREUVE: L'ANALYSE FONDÉE SUR LA CULTURE JURIDIQUE ET LE SYSTÈME JUSTICIABLE","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07851836060272198,"score_gpt":0.33813753556992165,"score_spread":0.25961917496719966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932693296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45573318,0.0059137633,0.15205322,0.022750057,0.00046787877,0.0008536163,0.00024638977,0.00006207784,0.3619198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717995,0.0009622419,0.014409595,0.00090342644,0.0001474536,0.0002752545,0.00007458978,0.000029025672,0.011398896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820952,0.0081972405,0.0014441836,0.001452523,0.004680894,0.002129907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601664,0.022877637,0.0055434923,0.0018378955,0.007996678,0.0015779572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014308184,0.00052529183,0.0007717483,0.005213865,0.0038741117,0.01144797,0.002248476,0.0027280997,0.01409748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047528487,0.00036424072,0.0021558346,0.0030139633,0.010469368,0.0090621,0.0068790815,0.0037427333,0.00079991744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057010406,0.000056710865,0.017504193,0.0002951692,0.0000905456,0.0011332253,0.015864622,0.0013209396,0.0005052054,0.9275334,0.0019873697,0.033651575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009283935,0.0003540612,0.08188221,0.0018801797,0.00041043156,0.003651711,0.109962314,0.027623447,0.004344892,0.68364835,0.08592066,0.00022891126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061558764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002876828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99384415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050341403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072960504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075669825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935613573","doi":"","title":"Context, Choice, and Rights: PHS Community Services Society v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Political science; Charter; Politics; Social rights","score_opus":0.03665535828249157,"score_gpt":0.27433113153540206,"score_spread":0.2376757732529105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935613573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10337089,0.010040078,0.0008391143,0.25345325,0.0014481196,0.00042639978,0.0012991326,0.0001339291,0.62898904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5582353,0.003858928,0.00093203096,0.18871646,0.0003977695,0.0002455142,0.0003668928,0.00007000169,0.24717715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941399,0.00038056824,0.00009003404,0.00043666209,0.001961134,0.0029916833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784744,0.0003682177,0.00006832533,0.000049560284,0.0006007021,0.0010658066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020590092,0.0005437661,0.00034183345,0.0012000187,0.033310372,0.007957247,0.0028977825,0.01297264,0.009095556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038136751,0.000769234,0.00056553434,0.001586481,0.008537999,0.00167572,0.0030202314,0.008922155,0.0006386154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009676151,0.00015077,0.015677107,0.00016175615,0.00005738591,0.0050822245,0.019655969,0.0007851968,0.0013623502,0.41574284,0.5069494,0.0342782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020393332,0.000106634194,0.057734616,0.0005271267,0.00016129683,0.0010619543,0.033075023,0.0012140593,0.001071049,0.027695913,0.8768472,0.00030105608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088804126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088804126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21768215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64432204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936754017","doi":"","title":"Les services électroniques de Revenu Québec, aspects juridiques et protection des renseignements confidentiels","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.023154108390587746,"score_gpt":0.2701675367204721,"score_spread":0.24701342832988438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936754017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3247426,0.035234727,0.020726878,0.06088423,0.0013925083,0.000521122,0.0077086138,0.0011507849,0.54763854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.625084,0.010522333,0.010548725,0.00266435,0.00021048772,0.00015252458,0.0016299764,0.00015926252,0.3490284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670595,0.0005434115,0.00009254488,0.00024217283,0.0017880921,0.0006278485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282974,0.001538783,0.00037313113,0.0004976149,0.004155596,0.00060513284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034979843,0.00050890684,0.00040623255,0.0024931806,0.0086206235,0.006046284,0.0014519964,0.0023298564,0.02744399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011903687,0.0003817087,0.00032759056,0.0032098254,0.0021600123,0.0027413876,0.001452454,0.0017142359,0.0019870526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071728794,0.0003056243,0.058180198,0.0011234013,0.00010985081,0.0025265059,0.014943463,0.0035616604,0.008421036,0.20136857,0.24459986,0.46414244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008045438,0.00008082953,0.09329741,0.00077591656,0.00006218776,0.0009051788,0.011014676,0.0032295713,0.005398455,0.011540128,0.8734592,0.00015598275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92172104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9483027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07827896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02320351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039317872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16835403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943010453","doi":"10.32920/24237007.v1","title":"Whither International Law? Security Certificates, the Supreme Court, and the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Principle of legality; International human rights law; Human rights; International law; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Public international law; Right to property","score_opus":0.02641901366170655,"score_gpt":0.28566120161316,"score_spread":0.25924218795145343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943010453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4140001,0.013310498,0.000894475,0.18694988,0.0008711602,0.00009238527,0.00069106556,0.00004977172,0.38314068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419165,0.0036682738,0.00032116924,0.008896352,0.00009943099,0.0000146109,0.00012351372,0.000023957293,0.044936106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969234,0.000196529,0.00005208747,0.00025117514,0.0007682074,0.0018086808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959363,0.0007514778,0.0002588307,0.00008005457,0.0012042297,0.0017691597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015661645,0.00024740526,0.00039888974,0.001548904,0.027666936,0.011980968,0.0018976189,0.0033569357,0.009432658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053983317,0.00034047136,0.0004104348,0.002972717,0.012671026,0.0028172813,0.002853937,0.005850038,0.00028054457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072264585,0.000088460416,0.026171211,0.00011780641,0.000032285607,0.0011507535,0.025404865,0.0009150032,0.00031301012,0.83032125,0.08344214,0.031970877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008954529,0.000054432785,0.11569097,0.0007607657,0.00015512227,0.0004331918,0.111335374,0.0037144034,0.0010249534,0.077446684,0.6889664,0.00032820532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2099396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2099396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2735066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9163581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950021427","doi":"","title":"A Second Chance for the Harm Principle in Section 7? Gross Disproportionality Post-Bedford","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Harm principle; Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.10357095539118184,"score_gpt":0.42127848035895976,"score_spread":0.31770752496777793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950021427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037594736,0.0068462426,0.014028424,0.29993004,0.004057661,0.000074951495,0.00013503086,0.00012022739,0.6372127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62622136,0.0018104585,0.0044381646,0.15009744,0.0023435208,0.00015133202,0.00006961687,0.00010401969,0.21476407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660313,0.000778677,0.0001010744,0.0006040291,0.0011012872,0.0008117867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985366,0.0007123078,0.00006716508,0.00015157796,0.0004014138,0.00013099652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003219773,0.00030742932,0.00037774484,0.00039274505,0.0058362386,0.0038768344,0.0012043816,0.0071932403,0.005269313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005850798,0.00027460832,0.000434668,0.00025137988,0.011598165,0.003496693,0.0020442826,0.0099901045,0.00088650273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008831365,0.000006195276,0.00019209302,0.0000096051535,0.0000019573772,0.000047746562,0.0007842105,0.00006240005,0.00007286384,0.9759305,0.019403752,0.00347983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020269314,0.00003459748,0.0015196399,0.0002250924,0.000014364845,0.00013500734,0.0010081234,0.000483055,0.0009756527,0.5808888,0.4146307,0.000064666136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10567581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16409416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8943242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007408363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006937801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21012145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950405747","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.514","title":"Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Acquittal; Dilemma; Reasonable doubt; Law; Adversarial system; Hearsay; Epistemology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07507757489754922,"score_gpt":0.332331606111525,"score_spread":0.2572540312139758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950405747","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09172178,0.008421026,0.38007203,0.2540025,0.00097549177,0.00042460806,0.0001932512,0.00018619426,0.26400307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161932,0.0016199027,0.067663275,0.006530565,0.00091025553,0.0002671824,0.00007006396,0.000046252208,0.0066994037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668394,0.0234227,0.0017588167,0.0019525416,0.004905465,0.0011211259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92333513,0.0651792,0.0032164506,0.0037148118,0.003227486,0.0013268517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04218858,0.0008486624,0.0015301483,0.004435525,0.007029337,0.011569138,0.0036144448,0.011047933,0.0032769828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064407825,0.0008717701,0.0017442752,0.0024564397,0.05463378,0.024256745,0.0095372535,0.0101286,0.00043633857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001127094,0.000008100475,0.00007906879,0.00003203876,0.0000075958133,0.0001170773,0.0010359089,0.00039989012,0.000045507957,0.99525356,0.00045508565,0.0025549561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001451858,0.000004790798,0.000027454169,0.000027319164,0.000002903752,0.00004042527,0.00020042645,0.00079181755,0.000028172286,0.99697304,0.0018833558,0.0000057718216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022197044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017425283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04218858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006032687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053475783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22311723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952198423","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1235","title":"From Smith to Smickle: The Charter’s Minimal Impact on Mandatory Minimum Sentences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionality; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06241246396626157,"score_gpt":0.3777623568292147,"score_spread":0.3153498928629531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952198423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104157284,0.01869492,0.017958295,0.24661267,0.0043701814,0.00018510953,0.0005661997,0.00024078315,0.6072146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90009797,0.0048324247,0.0062437714,0.0454632,0.00094482,0.00007205976,0.00012235493,0.00013080492,0.0420926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98411155,0.0022122485,0.00041166347,0.0017166506,0.00916476,0.002383181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786815,0.009502242,0.0009924341,0.001349235,0.008183957,0.0012907793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011828706,0.0004218203,0.0006802169,0.0026117095,0.012254814,0.0103222905,0.0023419242,0.0048159324,0.0056924513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04631944,0.0003887987,0.0008272554,0.0018993756,0.022552168,0.0072106346,0.0037194055,0.010487611,0.00038152296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035535235,0.000008508365,0.00087741646,0.000068827016,0.000012321742,0.00017301065,0.0032263824,0.0002323951,0.00032870154,0.9509741,0.024014555,0.020048248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000664696,0.00014156142,0.011191512,0.001142132,0.00016925856,0.00022900519,0.0067524198,0.0012637053,0.0034699112,0.36353248,0.61175954,0.0002819182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7965011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88387907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7965011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03928257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08082934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40939468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953862133","doi":"","title":"압수수색과 위법수집증거배제법칙에 관한 연구","year":2008,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"형사정책연구원 연구총서","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Supreme court; Discretion; Law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Injustice; Search and seizure; Admissible evidence; Meaning (existential); Psychology","score_opus":0.08338113836521893,"score_gpt":0.33849270374932156,"score_spread":0.2551115653841026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953862133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107462965,0.032347232,0.19816963,0.02201318,0.0014992456,0.0005946014,0.0007775678,0.00013045128,0.63700515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8270145,0.024434833,0.066989966,0.004844762,0.0017027974,0.0006820071,0.00077284925,0.00007784343,0.073480494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211943,0.0025079607,0.000868587,0.0014608075,0.0024953736,0.0005477976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725925,0.016041493,0.0037736087,0.0026226267,0.004521353,0.00044851343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005995844,0.0004919804,0.0008375635,0.003410658,0.002189595,0.006716408,0.0015880768,0.002223498,0.008812896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01797173,0.00038188358,0.0010014203,0.0020671268,0.005929422,0.007993112,0.0020469548,0.0021341874,0.0026776819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002614927,0.00006810327,0.002313798,0.00028786634,0.000022503009,0.00020798043,0.00074034923,0.00093716633,0.00037808708,0.96365064,0.002012835,0.029354546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019285273,0.00024293868,0.00501849,0.001133632,0.00008262483,0.0011379365,0.002173948,0.004767292,0.0024699809,0.82960415,0.15328474,0.00006504201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016025428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014050398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008812896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002112944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004228697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031709433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957645886","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1218","title":"Normative Foundations for Reasonable Expectations of Privacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Authorization; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.15935085854212497,"score_gpt":0.39228605571898134,"score_spread":0.23293519717685637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957645886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039714746,0.0027685813,0.20501961,0.08061072,0.00039453522,0.0003131997,0.0006823892,0.00014378937,0.6703525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96209395,0.00084948336,0.022438554,0.0069135455,0.0003974849,0.0005972306,0.00022069199,0.00006105015,0.00642796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621914,0.016262067,0.002597115,0.004753379,0.01084869,0.0033473922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460685,0.032307476,0.003925945,0.0060056327,0.009843388,0.0018490247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032130323,0.00070718996,0.0010037462,0.0025091828,0.005506469,0.011722456,0.0028206524,0.009785576,0.005521017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05726138,0.0008557099,0.0017258232,0.0013237756,0.036461413,0.012589287,0.005519472,0.010807213,0.0009248177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020914251,0.0000037347668,0.000056150922,0.0000067587143,0.0000028471768,0.000017609475,0.00021251608,0.00014453566,0.00001622694,0.9989692,0.00030310987,0.00026522542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008509419,0.0000033622441,0.0000759627,0.000026116912,0.0000027468545,0.000021414926,0.00012421893,0.0004808285,0.000041027055,0.99649054,0.00271831,0.0000070200535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01236573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010293395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032130323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012994265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109227495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16992337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958197909","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1125","title":"Fault and Punishment under Sections 7 and 12 of the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Punishment (psychology); Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Section (typography); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07239135689893765,"score_gpt":0.32578832363266713,"score_spread":0.25339696673372947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958197909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037351903,0.0111586815,0.08971714,0.13363408,0.006047057,0.000627024,0.0006079081,0.00049851456,0.7203577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72118604,0.0037235247,0.045659415,0.11758079,0.004872485,0.0015178858,0.00037632367,0.00017348926,0.10491011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.959652,0.013543622,0.003705568,0.0047587766,0.012173948,0.0061661387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97328466,0.0137322815,0.0033006195,0.002839324,0.0058722184,0.0009708227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026777178,0.0005337984,0.0009558244,0.0013026529,0.0049562356,0.01039856,0.0023975256,0.015593818,0.0032135823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047937825,0.0009063286,0.0015643925,0.0007755273,0.01970907,0.0055046882,0.0037554135,0.017284391,0.001169713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008719064,0.0000071713685,0.00017361599,0.000016945247,0.000003903239,0.000055021323,0.00034095053,0.00013978856,0.000078739045,0.98990905,0.0070439354,0.0022221946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063425556,0.00017347813,0.0018283476,0.0003218963,0.000038877828,0.00032926298,0.0005037697,0.00089084794,0.0009349354,0.789948,0.20482896,0.00013815261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025770804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024316208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070591546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024198556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14161295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960694789","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1174","title":"When Secret Intelligence Becomes Evidence: Some Implications of Khadr and Charkaoui II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Intelligence analysis; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intelligence cycle; Psychology; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Military intelligence; History","score_opus":0.10335455861839292,"score_gpt":0.39145862303280926,"score_spread":0.2881040644144163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960694789","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012141167,0.10825815,0.0023805937,0.710437,0.0030516863,0.00007403942,0.00010645938,0.000024611094,0.16352628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6531614,0.09982009,0.003877113,0.2103816,0.0036540362,0.00011111707,0.00006772903,0.000056408833,0.028870491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724984,0.009056783,0.0012769753,0.0023625423,0.011854377,0.0029508523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94993436,0.03645005,0.0016112321,0.0014478505,0.009366246,0.0011902868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024967276,0.00039434977,0.0011013498,0.0033977148,0.014897139,0.024034094,0.0041351463,0.016640576,0.001555219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047516257,0.00076963543,0.0006763323,0.00442598,0.07124083,0.013155882,0.0049292254,0.019484911,0.0002987307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012694937,0.0000073877436,0.00031311106,0.00011877172,0.000008318352,0.0006493563,0.00916303,0.000074676995,0.00007236534,0.96158975,0.018263921,0.009726684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042788542,0.000033148375,0.0028852287,0.0027918909,0.00007764922,0.0010537426,0.027352655,0.00044752698,0.0007703818,0.4061038,0.55825317,0.00018806466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54848653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5159166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54848653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05411587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07307608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90834504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964458389","doi":"10.7202/1017521ar","title":"Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Winnipeg Regional Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09913062218168837,"score_gpt":0.3615921520979623,"score_spread":0.2624615299162739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964458389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037053265,0.01799593,0.010420972,0.9211258,0.008884988,0.00006463183,0.00022987077,0.00020445911,0.03736795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18659486,0.00992676,0.025032617,0.7485049,0.01175613,0.00025875986,0.00021481261,0.0003124179,0.017398719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85252297,0.03632264,0.0131098,0.015835136,0.07612557,0.006083915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7695147,0.12394721,0.006980751,0.016302552,0.079301834,0.0039530005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12793647,0.00068063935,0.0012498243,0.005658894,0.009511545,0.016145926,0.0051765097,0.016876396,0.0021752974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30101702,0.0011969107,0.0016382766,0.004374739,0.028611578,0.010372557,0.004419341,0.027199157,0.0009901894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043301763,0.000010607415,0.00070523284,0.00017745596,0.000043376283,0.00012870305,0.0017790713,0.00021629562,0.0002836809,0.7187369,0.24736851,0.030506937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007572436,0.000051818897,0.002832769,0.00091240846,0.00008137157,0.00026389898,0.0009855351,0.0010785181,0.0010567709,0.1951624,0.7972622,0.0002365239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2593016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2706824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2593016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031570233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04147742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6766008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964723810","doi":"10.7202/017258ar","title":"Le droit pénal de l’environnement : une garantie d'impunité ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Sanctions; CLARITY; Law; Statutory law; Criminal law; Multitude; Politics; Political science; Trespass; State (computer science); Environmental law; Subject (documents); Business","score_opus":0.2425476848064619,"score_gpt":0.3897422239212053,"score_spread":0.14719453911474337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964723810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019252766,0.09907051,0.0020156768,0.4667884,0.0059163123,0.0000195344,0.00024186021,0.000066340006,0.40662855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66566515,0.04743924,0.0015736889,0.059314772,0.003533994,0.000046481768,0.0001598679,0.00008118556,0.22218564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980829,0.00051839504,0.00005570445,0.00018651351,0.0007316869,0.00042483266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980392,0.00078327156,0.00020641583,0.00015943963,0.0006369669,0.00017476217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013691403,0.00043049367,0.00032937055,0.0010303127,0.0047887405,0.0076656095,0.0011900007,0.005256061,0.012399587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006296322,0.00023716856,0.00027086417,0.0013120509,0.011203321,0.0056418683,0.0018071126,0.004696618,0.0013015659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022928896,0.000018703473,0.0013301548,0.00012462985,0.000011211296,0.00038991353,0.0027374898,0.0001837394,0.00012842819,0.84070075,0.106633805,0.04771815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007451744,0.000016770038,0.006683629,0.0007079481,0.000009938421,0.00035325118,0.004285346,0.00020892946,0.00020160804,0.044279464,0.94320834,0.000037282105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27019525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32301414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27019525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008168099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058681276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53724504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964798335","doi":"10.7202/1026922ar","title":"L’incrimination du financement du terrorisme en droits canadien et suisse","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014901269573643256,"score_gpt":0.2619158710796743,"score_spread":0.24701460150603102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964798335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17320019,0.029960006,0.0035487213,0.07875901,0.001417264,0.00010470875,0.0008812338,0.00004171454,0.71208715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86805993,0.010269236,0.0011662815,0.0112980185,0.0002599392,0.00008095313,0.0002973608,0.000032026943,0.108536296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992589,0.0015872851,0.00016879964,0.0006393636,0.0029950244,0.0020203628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924551,0.0028136857,0.0011029586,0.00050763995,0.002359984,0.00076065573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033995158,0.0004984991,0.0004975214,0.0030199958,0.01020863,0.006859456,0.0013637708,0.0036495554,0.009812791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009507179,0.00031196143,0.00042770524,0.004673313,0.013151258,0.002319536,0.0039665047,0.005619898,0.00069555454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006602665,0.0000425233,0.031680044,0.0002636579,0.000066237175,0.000877551,0.06016665,0.00029268864,0.00036333333,0.80893934,0.028701888,0.06854009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022336988,0.000054102577,0.07868005,0.0018486164,0.000109299384,0.001316461,0.047912393,0.00046688333,0.0011923068,0.042375658,0.82583416,0.00018763433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7552649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8047446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24473512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025856867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034064934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49235278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964881625","doi":"10.7202/1027996ar","title":"Peines minimales obligatoires et exemptions constitutionnelles : la politique du pire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecology","score_opus":0.023811212593317574,"score_gpt":0.28921867564253495,"score_spread":0.26540746304921736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964881625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048290662,0.009035731,0.07995299,0.07241916,0.001167933,0.00021726791,0.00021912991,0.00016553876,0.7885316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8689757,0.0037434816,0.022475878,0.012790417,0.0009629958,0.00071114674,0.000105423365,0.00016573249,0.09006927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798314,0.00986835,0.0012461969,0.0029382114,0.0046186703,0.0014970929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839161,0.01190431,0.0009184155,0.001505092,0.001323026,0.00043303697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017208025,0.00052324176,0.00097241096,0.0017297609,0.0066838926,0.01178491,0.0015637878,0.0065924693,0.008191206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024896147,0.00081149046,0.0010250732,0.0012101814,0.031118661,0.010474417,0.007656116,0.014844864,0.0011202712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005082453,0.0000049474143,0.00006474901,0.000018009705,0.000003063602,0.000022073824,0.0010044345,0.000051588013,0.00006446086,0.9968064,0.00061426766,0.0013408384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033582368,0.000044790046,0.0006365181,0.00028350193,0.000018677058,0.00013884714,0.0014519215,0.00042394415,0.00064379274,0.88429767,0.11198856,0.00003812729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007437875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008362751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017208025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005874933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007956291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0910058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966391573","doi":"10.7202/043248ar","title":"La nature non purement privée d'un devoir et l'article 844 du Code de procédure civile","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009013353517548534,"score_gpt":0.2763487014162077,"score_spread":0.2673353478986592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966391573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019694936,0.0072589964,0.010314674,0.048584428,0.0029146334,0.00014508572,0.0007625444,0.00023828128,0.91008633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15122321,0.0024016916,0.004014384,0.014650023,0.00043314163,0.00023668811,0.0003018068,0.00019977835,0.8265393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283266,0.0012637951,0.00020743618,0.0010662407,0.0032475505,0.0013822862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970162,0.0009931237,0.00019877143,0.00027298354,0.0012893126,0.00022961994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025084359,0.0007863452,0.00044856526,0.0010262904,0.008018735,0.008465628,0.0013733689,0.005820503,0.014395069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069373935,0.00056848134,0.000765332,0.0013157486,0.011222734,0.0023700262,0.0020843442,0.007867129,0.0030036587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027060009,0.000015998252,0.00051671336,0.00011864001,0.000010215462,0.00014576918,0.006426004,0.00024309203,0.00070279784,0.88118213,0.095697075,0.01491457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007060404,0.000014660994,0.0024417555,0.0001695312,0.000011680106,0.000069911875,0.0013927332,0.00019170722,0.0005195663,0.014061763,0.9810844,0.000035228306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6582408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.761987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6582408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023637021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04240953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68754375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966850877","doi":"10.7202/042370ar","title":"La rétroactivité d'une loi à caractère criminel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Statute; Interpretation (philosophy); Duty; Law; Criminal code; Order (exchange); Political science; Criminal law; Computer science; Legislation; Business","score_opus":0.01942687439225597,"score_gpt":0.292251129255248,"score_spread":0.272824254862992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966850877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10857537,0.011672497,0.047954146,0.067281105,0.00402002,0.00047356638,0.00040734094,0.00092553964,0.7586904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7340928,0.0049247392,0.018835152,0.016004676,0.0020349976,0.00032333317,0.00018005891,0.0002595786,0.22334471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873908,0.003579999,0.0007145864,0.0016938157,0.005052018,0.0015686284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761544,0.011276333,0.002685611,0.0046016844,0.0044986135,0.00078338076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01698855,0.0005106878,0.0005628566,0.0020206114,0.0046652444,0.011543379,0.0022492122,0.0036104652,0.008229483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03260937,0.0006621766,0.00068775844,0.0014222269,0.009187575,0.0055163037,0.00387448,0.008222966,0.0017324266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009237251,0.00016283778,0.009689252,0.00030108605,0.000044986748,0.0019104057,0.013248249,0.0003366829,0.002250639,0.806607,0.021558516,0.14379793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041301762,0.00045319623,0.011894794,0.001081544,0.00013533264,0.0033536812,0.0063844942,0.0009109702,0.009688668,0.04083213,0.92507035,0.00015359976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014830172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019437086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01698855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005540987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009492018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08984506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966956664","doi":"10.7202/043235ar","title":"Les défis du droit pénal de l'environnement : les régimes de responsabilité pénale de Sault Ste-Marie à Wholesale Travel","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015710801554566285,"score_gpt":0.2648371682708408,"score_spread":0.24912636671627453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966956664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17406057,0.009024057,0.013227186,0.090850614,0.0005362381,0.00014033918,0.0002656303,0.0000591897,0.7118362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92760426,0.0020383133,0.0022674066,0.0070301495,0.0001232474,0.00007886149,0.000047180387,0.000027529131,0.06078302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958508,0.00076054124,0.00014955363,0.00044494992,0.0016648811,0.0011292292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972371,0.000897307,0.00029570973,0.0001862668,0.000979592,0.00040410826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026529597,0.000499788,0.00046535808,0.0015511786,0.009513585,0.011165099,0.0015369112,0.0060929144,0.0042557246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064719925,0.00028366828,0.0003861974,0.0014458887,0.02502003,0.0023136365,0.0029102697,0.0069219274,0.00038507156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001215611,0.0000074049744,0.0010343415,0.000029640583,0.000005574987,0.00012463785,0.008065277,0.00015940952,0.00018879274,0.9839003,0.0024591077,0.004013317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072447554,0.000117531534,0.028691944,0.0012352614,0.000098257486,0.00063923316,0.043787908,0.0020856143,0.0019419587,0.38401845,0.53712916,0.00018222418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6371891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74306405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6371891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023730632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027092483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7298951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968418547","doi":"10.7202/1002078ar","title":"Les droits et libertés à l’heure de la dérogation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche sociologique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3547984232970642,"score_gpt":0.4687723894405342,"score_spread":0.11397396614347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968418547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06549764,0.0029495342,0.031454075,0.024222707,0.0005378779,0.000074557014,0.00024112167,0.00009607837,0.8749264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81894046,0.0022076655,0.0065916036,0.0022470744,0.00033081727,0.00016113829,0.00013149016,0.0001276558,0.16926207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421036,0.00208164,0.00022279395,0.0010814122,0.0013645922,0.0010391057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943824,0.0021179565,0.00069026335,0.0013929335,0.0010595612,0.0003569421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046893125,0.00041933695,0.0005902385,0.0016462541,0.006322759,0.009180655,0.0012056069,0.0037932824,0.021268366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010462365,0.00047935115,0.0006428377,0.001256183,0.03500958,0.008064219,0.0054776296,0.0059486777,0.003270807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068695276,0.0000034555496,0.00025918096,0.0000118153475,0.000002954299,0.000035965546,0.0031078057,0.00003228897,0.000098805554,0.9934481,0.0006154441,0.0023773191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018862016,0.000031080508,0.0027248971,0.00018605067,0.000021195832,0.00039459942,0.0061324136,0.00030114222,0.0007987758,0.6732523,0.31609032,0.000048252554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010275927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012777213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021268366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047215386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004645368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07114977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969351015","doi":"10.7202/039837ar","title":"La Loi sur l’immunité des États canadienne et la torture","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Torture; Philosophy; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.036683292972897776,"score_gpt":0.31576733022498904,"score_spread":0.27908403725209124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969351015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16127042,0.019098364,0.009800534,0.09118561,0.0006741213,0.00007841148,0.00073159335,0.00009295349,0.717068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8579558,0.008821193,0.0015955067,0.00970223,0.00020921309,0.00004432043,0.00017447164,0.000036530706,0.121460654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956196,0.0006364661,0.00009200627,0.00048105035,0.0017861414,0.001384783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943764,0.0019920554,0.0006742948,0.00026901005,0.0020152777,0.00067297777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026889953,0.00034481788,0.00041226647,0.001756886,0.009165166,0.007157094,0.0011408573,0.0030219778,0.011003069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006036094,0.00029692057,0.00066700263,0.0022066378,0.014641067,0.0026015763,0.0033676573,0.0058747884,0.0005184446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002581961,0.000019296875,0.008910803,0.00009464564,0.000031499436,0.00023704852,0.011685806,0.0004265401,0.0003244206,0.95753455,0.0076717967,0.013037814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026111384,0.00009422101,0.08644418,0.0013649075,0.00016440461,0.0005479686,0.027596341,0.0012935643,0.0019752719,0.13480902,0.74547696,0.00020693852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86508363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91049695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13491637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043068644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050019983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31248635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970983722","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831","title":"The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Entrapment; Interview; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.13727744968855873,"score_gpt":0.4025959515357165,"score_spread":0.2653185018471578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970983722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98086447,0.004643176,0.00030442682,0.002062242,0.00005334423,0.0000625459,0.00005495081,0.0000047002072,0.011950126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99154234,0.0045094434,0.00035726526,0.0006982777,0.000020653877,0.00003290734,0.000076272394,0.00001281509,0.0027499401],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98359966,0.005640109,0.00053924444,0.0007480358,0.0051893727,0.004283628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728373,0.010135412,0.00423329,0.0007891547,0.008763153,0.0032416326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010464913,0.00030419073,0.0011618027,0.007481526,0.017623648,0.0072517814,0.0021448405,0.0016776028,0.0018937933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03741311,0.0006004342,0.00041698394,0.014805335,0.00976778,0.0030221057,0.00666173,0.0022495494,0.00016871003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636924,0.00026328393,0.13399665,0.00051104435,0.00010405166,0.0024935699,0.7679507,0.0004615285,0.00075096096,0.0155071085,0.0033408604,0.07435657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012953292,0.00008920169,0.409576,0.0006129185,0.000044161745,0.0005577441,0.56243795,0.00045010092,0.00037638392,0.0007838771,0.024982618,0.00007605286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9708246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057573766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057573766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087001234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41772884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971757365","doi":"10.7202/043815ar","title":"Échanger est-il péché ? Analyse de la norme de tolérance de la société canadienne contemporaine à la lumière de l’arrêt R. c. Labaye","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012408878495376233,"score_gpt":0.2871082939695794,"score_spread":0.2746994154742031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971757365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8031927,0.0024202925,0.0040919594,0.014140714,0.00019931712,0.00003203929,0.00017865957,0.000023325845,0.17572089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98822,0.0006432465,0.00047859747,0.00038117747,0.000025532574,0.000020991229,0.00004232539,0.000015979858,0.010172137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737966,0.0009709152,0.00006727864,0.00031361723,0.0009964168,0.00027212064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99219716,0.0023131806,0.0009075497,0.00032042045,0.0034790332,0.000782675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004894578,0.00020772834,0.0003932476,0.0024110808,0.0054603308,0.0064938995,0.00067876047,0.00060462294,0.006091906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012224601,0.00013331852,0.00022863547,0.0035739786,0.007955425,0.002472207,0.002601335,0.0018514831,0.0003678558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001357518,0.000065545064,0.09187827,0.0001833617,0.00007102972,0.0004964956,0.61405605,0.0008866551,0.00073638547,0.19294508,0.0063255746,0.09221976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005571743,0.000080213234,0.20818907,0.00057379506,0.000041805808,0.00015853606,0.6102035,0.0009774215,0.0007305739,0.020400334,0.15851966,0.00011942235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34569636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4457216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65430367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012941671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009740496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6873684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973073041","doi":"10.7202/043535ar","title":"Paramètres d'un véhicule procédural efficace","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015334352095450705,"score_gpt":0.2737350164118932,"score_spread":0.2584006643164425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973073041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4425855,0.001809924,0.37939325,0.0014882905,0.00014874084,0.00073339936,0.0016157876,0.0008114987,0.17141366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456767,0.0005510257,0.04137658,0.00009394355,0.000029571336,0.0004186868,0.00046869932,0.00017622902,0.01120859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98780894,0.004390843,0.0006596146,0.0013683757,0.0048696552,0.0009025244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599262,0.02659566,0.0041258507,0.004589108,0.0040571894,0.0007059313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008643905,0.0010528318,0.00077264645,0.0031217453,0.001272359,0.00542337,0.0010732055,0.0017188869,0.016516786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046581145,0.00058145757,0.0011050786,0.0019957789,0.002484598,0.0033826835,0.002269757,0.0012254799,0.002216744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081112323,0.00069039327,0.04568734,0.0012124755,0.0006583712,0.0008390739,0.0021476275,0.23264146,0.039712213,0.37268713,0.005008199,0.2979046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016839939,0.0036990922,0.16819051,0.0010571196,0.0011269792,0.003105686,0.005689953,0.26312968,0.12588388,0.31072077,0.11652416,0.0007038641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027253649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002559725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016516786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016899373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018874274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0552541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973440412","doi":"10.7202/039342ar","title":"L’évolution à la pièce de la défense d’erreur de droit : l’erreur attribuable aux conseils inexacts d’un juriste ou aux jugements des tribunaux fut-elle laissée à la dérive ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025199577702375485,"score_gpt":0.30892025593363664,"score_spread":0.2837206782312612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973440412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12276335,0.0035534264,0.023745032,0.029034818,0.0008716463,0.00008743737,0.00014754193,0.00011687421,0.81967986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431321,0.0010561944,0.0045107445,0.0024036192,0.000166595,0.00005745845,0.0000740567,0.0001294098,0.14846979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951084,0.0012440318,0.00019116401,0.0010701569,0.0014733806,0.0009129267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587566,0.00089693436,0.0004203019,0.0010507146,0.0013660628,0.00039034412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046700714,0.00040802,0.0003981066,0.0015630651,0.008572475,0.010834529,0.0015375804,0.0033879299,0.0076671913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008232173,0.00041505575,0.0005296625,0.0014198897,0.026759043,0.0051098517,0.0046888515,0.007901092,0.0014005803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001676611,0.000006515497,0.0011433983,0.000025367111,0.000007235158,0.00011262435,0.017443202,0.00012268647,0.0004133969,0.97016823,0.0015897998,0.008950888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003024392,0.00009409258,0.013775771,0.0006003347,0.00004709264,0.0005145197,0.023416288,0.0005943583,0.00235728,0.23065215,0.7278142,0.00010368452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07886393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08991537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07886393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011858143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137735335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15680975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973624887","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01174.x","title":"ACCès à information et reassignments personnel's: le précédent qéuébcois","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Commission; Mandate; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.04713340604759006,"score_gpt":0.30047298034130515,"score_spread":0.2533395742937151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973624887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044903707,0.013228008,0.007587311,0.1622502,0.0047924067,0.00079072383,0.0017325343,0.00037892332,0.7643361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24306788,0.003833406,0.0042419187,0.02862583,0.0008698255,0.00034809895,0.0005631875,0.000108217624,0.7183416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830494,0.0024034183,0.0007556332,0.0021032274,0.0066700466,0.0050182864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98053426,0.004286015,0.00084769627,0.0012869029,0.008948489,0.0040965513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011634622,0.00053528615,0.00035086533,0.002861953,0.015417645,0.015475646,0.0025397628,0.010285596,0.0293668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025598852,0.0009296528,0.00047151468,0.0031570497,0.012319443,0.0072184727,0.005755805,0.008987926,0.005307866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011490984,0.00013610283,0.0073269596,0.00038070572,0.000009987298,0.0008854219,0.03867744,0.00030327885,0.0008108411,0.6362742,0.21798788,0.09709232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010473539,0.00003729204,0.0071708183,0.00031277086,0.000005938337,0.00009146817,0.0034107182,0.000098455916,0.00032071242,0.003601964,0.9849069,0.00003250282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89465624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90762943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06888347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13491206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4997869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975058548","doi":"10.7202/043592ar","title":"La version française des lois constitutionnelles du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00880620046958429,"score_gpt":0.22686979448509031,"score_spread":0.218063594015506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975058548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04402441,0.00991124,0.003840819,0.023658913,0.0024482107,0.00015323929,0.0021931068,0.00028663018,0.91348356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32867736,0.0039976155,0.0029416287,0.0060074995,0.0002284935,0.00013094969,0.0007517571,0.0001713046,0.6570934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946248,0.00043175693,0.00019626837,0.00066492544,0.0026524004,0.0014298485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642086,0.00053818856,0.00014494102,0.00027886155,0.0022791086,0.0003380744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00241392,0.00052749325,0.00040113673,0.0018930311,0.012900626,0.00966241,0.0011582866,0.002635598,0.015011877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057082935,0.00043630158,0.00043674617,0.0030853169,0.00667948,0.0015898554,0.0020271412,0.0042430675,0.0012720168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006751306,0.00002034403,0.0018178173,0.00012336296,0.00001672765,0.00032900475,0.015442873,0.000517139,0.0014973393,0.8231049,0.11371538,0.0433476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012539682,0.000008765203,0.005254335,0.00012133454,0.000010339217,0.00004968663,0.0016227168,0.00016903889,0.0004106437,0.0043155532,0.9879776,0.00004735822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110659875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110659875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13406904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80289733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976297784","doi":"10.7202/042330ar","title":"Les ordonnances de dédommagement et de restitution en droit pénal canadien","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Restitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional court; Parliament; Paragraph; Criminal code; Compensation (psychology); Criminal law; Constitution; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.01808691012837414,"score_gpt":0.3124062173870811,"score_spread":0.2943193072587069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976297784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21929725,0.033411354,0.016371751,0.03729836,0.00093508326,0.00011682784,0.00040168248,0.00013330762,0.69203436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87707716,0.013731115,0.0054424764,0.0021017743,0.0005543501,0.0001210947,0.00015501442,0.0000534683,0.10076354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309397,0.0018856241,0.00024443914,0.00041418785,0.0034547055,0.00090705807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942667,0.0035944586,0.00044952892,0.00031800632,0.0009970529,0.00037420308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043919613,0.0006391902,0.0004729529,0.002729004,0.0050047627,0.010295844,0.001204766,0.0039661843,0.0076751225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018324902,0.00045881057,0.00058762275,0.0025931725,0.014027882,0.0032560718,0.0016728425,0.008118067,0.00078012806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077957404,0.000034310204,0.002488541,0.00007985507,0.000015902922,0.00033210684,0.0039928732,0.00080639176,0.00042286655,0.95610845,0.0033201245,0.032320607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016917332,0.00014903177,0.080189474,0.0011204928,0.000091119786,0.001402458,0.014167471,0.003571399,0.0039015408,0.22408433,0.6708951,0.000258452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5658965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5763455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4341035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023499073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013481379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976545274","doi":"10.7202/1006418ar","title":"Les théories constitutionnelles de Louis-Philippe Pigeon : L’efficience du partage législatif des compétences et l’incrédulité face à la protection législative des droits fondamentaux","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09068385154578733,"score_gpt":0.31561329607460303,"score_spread":0.2249294445288157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976545274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23185118,0.0040884875,0.037917357,0.025297808,0.00031272916,0.00017908396,0.00020519744,0.00008807767,0.7000601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912706,0.0017391194,0.0062138615,0.0013747128,0.00006370316,0.00012203609,0.00008313983,0.000042986965,0.077654414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959478,0.0017259142,0.000091346315,0.000688529,0.00113428,0.00041223364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942115,0.0034267397,0.0005210479,0.00045354862,0.0010969588,0.00029020372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050630625,0.0004408842,0.00025689253,0.0017204955,0.005496279,0.0072157155,0.0010882361,0.0019816454,0.007363305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060414663,0.00040972914,0.0005364586,0.0013516492,0.017840272,0.0035441571,0.0022383812,0.003857688,0.0005944026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012411516,0.000012974674,0.0024446114,0.000047565954,0.000009385588,0.00009857117,0.02870599,0.00039546826,0.00025560832,0.95743424,0.0014158037,0.009167201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058725193,0.00014344142,0.049693394,0.0009926899,0.00011263023,0.00035241232,0.06630773,0.003678874,0.0035618346,0.28932253,0.58561176,0.00016399624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18075274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28187913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18075274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018175803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017823262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3594013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977244270","doi":"10.7202/042776ar","title":"La mise en oeuvre judiciaire de l'article 1 de la Charte canadienne et le droit de la preuve","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009023730935217982,"score_gpt":0.27488658256026205,"score_spread":0.2658628516250441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977244270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02816519,0.071065314,0.011371007,0.44415867,0.010866018,0.00015560277,0.00077002845,0.0001779338,0.4332702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6559135,0.0340339,0.014349731,0.0800283,0.004009629,0.00015615848,0.0005572908,0.00016870273,0.21078277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97566104,0.004345784,0.0008152857,0.002180553,0.014312668,0.0026846416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754184,0.0129987,0.0019745496,0.0013040407,0.007128983,0.0011753576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020123165,0.00071823545,0.0008908933,0.004138474,0.008992187,0.017795594,0.002868757,0.011422861,0.0044774804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05147558,0.000773235,0.0007464667,0.0038924501,0.017519066,0.0052642124,0.002916317,0.015822312,0.0008915072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018613626,0.000009323066,0.00096068915,0.000095746545,0.000013615838,0.00019374769,0.003077595,0.00024800329,0.0001906566,0.9022333,0.0654268,0.0275319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011634967,0.000024818279,0.005753806,0.0009170547,0.000038156973,0.00024970184,0.0018508566,0.0005253446,0.0008670758,0.07545669,0.914186,0.00011884552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7310157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80839413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26898432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04661807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068312734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5411368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977413935","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2000.18068","title":"La surveillance vidéo et le droit à la vie privée au Canada et au Québec : l'impact des chartes des droits et l'exclusion de la preuve","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022798317141870098,"score_gpt":0.3155657898430508,"score_spread":0.2927674727011807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977413935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.503925,0.005678157,0.0045791087,0.058650214,0.0006468112,0.00015084747,0.002223943,0.00009919989,0.42404673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227017,0.0026615448,0.0013158299,0.0032426803,0.000060692677,0.000065819615,0.0003797625,0.000044373784,0.06952756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738926,0.0005530299,0.00005083624,0.0002598246,0.0010199763,0.0007269559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937583,0.0015064374,0.00047613148,0.00022217017,0.0030474016,0.0009895832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018995065,0.00031334956,0.00032770768,0.0013907254,0.012283777,0.007510073,0.0013689108,0.001481839,0.016706709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008429457,0.00021199328,0.00028545343,0.0024775148,0.007610233,0.0024026646,0.0030423715,0.0034246955,0.0004888417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019390721,0.0001261865,0.10848319,0.0005199133,0.0000976429,0.0015136366,0.19319372,0.002473416,0.00196366,0.4794783,0.075066894,0.13688955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025641295,0.000084612126,0.2425348,0.0014199511,0.000089177505,0.00020409877,0.27088743,0.0015549712,0.0010937094,0.010689327,0.47119266,0.00022362122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0670604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0670604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09893647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48655957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978067332","doi":"10.7202/043531ar","title":"Les moyens alternatifs de résolution de conflits en matière civile et commerciale dans une perspective de réforme du Code de procédure civile","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.018098583035754175,"score_gpt":0.30957313243790996,"score_spread":0.2914745494021558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978067332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10294541,0.005046522,0.046272825,0.13373592,0.00085565547,0.00045741582,0.000107512395,0.00014258314,0.7104362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87637424,0.001511687,0.014302711,0.0059847645,0.0002495479,0.00022510895,0.000053586435,0.000065850305,0.10123235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978122,0.009054019,0.0005599859,0.0014908169,0.006100251,0.0046729646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877029,0.004391356,0.0013094149,0.0012636494,0.0039244303,0.0014082786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154151125,0.00076359423,0.00061340316,0.0025829058,0.013584795,0.016121546,0.003692053,0.010201752,0.011107249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02855497,0.0005232079,0.0010628485,0.0022911166,0.03466222,0.007492121,0.005270788,0.008339141,0.0011211685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013084937,0.000019114406,0.0005371431,0.000027044984,0.0000053228787,0.00012150928,0.0076148044,0.00038405388,0.00011194931,0.98190695,0.0027518317,0.0065071625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011778237,0.00015473137,0.0070593716,0.0005575285,0.00007361893,0.0004722329,0.043759122,0.00546575,0.0015460916,0.5645228,0.37613687,0.0001341279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24010384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36175042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24010384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034669008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055720914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47741258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980266038","doi":"10.7202/1027577ar","title":"L’évolution de la primauté du droit comme principe constitutionnel et sa relation avec le pouvoir exécutif en matière de renseignements confidentiels","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.020730553198779478,"score_gpt":0.2781573885644218,"score_spread":0.2574268353656423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980266038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46478343,0.0065124016,0.010857664,0.018297167,0.00019778805,0.000104904386,0.0005898365,0.000082080645,0.4985747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578219,0.0013859384,0.001916038,0.00032154424,0.000028507475,0.000014825153,0.000073910756,0.000034204142,0.038403023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975395,0.00047331673,0.000082950886,0.00034459113,0.0009957966,0.0005637804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921672,0.0025343448,0.001309365,0.00065471686,0.0024259114,0.0009084458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035411522,0.00021249961,0.00033337856,0.0026887741,0.005860414,0.008606092,0.00089781097,0.0011554384,0.014730142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011721611,0.0002906501,0.00030984712,0.0026577802,0.013752897,0.003074379,0.0030569346,0.0024408868,0.00068529573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057531983,0.000029795836,0.033966653,0.00013527581,0.000039671577,0.00026122187,0.026438918,0.00074788986,0.0007749261,0.8895888,0.0032194438,0.04473987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003616426,0.00010318385,0.26301327,0.0011341259,0.00009306783,0.0005723627,0.0489299,0.0018643636,0.002938292,0.17189385,0.5092281,0.00019329664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50456595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7142755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024231218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025212402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981435008","doi":"10.7202/042509ar","title":"Le devoir d'équité procédurale et le contrôle judiciaire ou quasi judiciaire de la procédure administrative","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Commission; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Res judicata; Civil procedure; Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Computer science","score_opus":0.01951758786633224,"score_gpt":0.3251546570569234,"score_spread":0.3056370691905912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981435008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021397518,0.028982224,0.26827508,0.07505987,0.0018321093,0.00015400065,0.0001586543,0.00022724704,0.6039133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7674575,0.012848638,0.06982337,0.012425313,0.0041471655,0.0006920435,0.00014460894,0.0003678403,0.13209361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95208395,0.024490764,0.0015443098,0.0049003703,0.014127488,0.0028530823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609108,0.023579337,0.0031509013,0.0068051233,0.004392115,0.0011616595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034587108,0.0006349846,0.0008212954,0.0017026163,0.004171956,0.019736694,0.002501273,0.0062566656,0.006963578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04241992,0.0005366049,0.0010922446,0.0023407103,0.039660037,0.01060474,0.0037470898,0.009949515,0.0012668805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040734963,0.0000025545658,0.000041244446,0.000011104446,0.0000024478754,0.000008371881,0.00042969486,0.000087292436,0.000037720798,0.99563605,0.0006259415,0.0031134132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022976179,0.00003643789,0.0009096617,0.00018712675,0.000012560071,0.000112614754,0.0004983194,0.0009204063,0.00044980846,0.82296735,0.17384732,0.00003549767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02467277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012847989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034587108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010855517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016551081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18291628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983117274","doi":"10.7202/042511ar","title":"Le contrôle judiciaire de la procédure administrative : éléments de droit comparé, fédéral, ontarien et québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Law; Judicial review; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01947120545434634,"score_gpt":0.318233499905877,"score_spread":0.2987622944515307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983117274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5162343,0.013800227,0.0049044914,0.036912397,0.00015116624,0.00012901073,0.00037490937,0.000047077723,0.4274465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961765,0.00090209476,0.00043593152,0.00072515185,0.000030145782,0.000021273432,0.000028811817,0.0000074192435,0.008231439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102587,0.0020101082,0.00022357081,0.00076251786,0.003920872,0.0020571016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983615,0.008784066,0.0016141259,0.00067443796,0.004104765,0.0012075332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009194845,0.00030735778,0.00050652656,0.0042749234,0.0121356,0.015478297,0.0014638884,0.0026434187,0.0042614667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017263945,0.00033416678,0.000336522,0.0040565357,0.020742062,0.0024098756,0.0022942927,0.0031029962,0.00016512873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093196315,0.000054844164,0.040849596,0.00010553982,0.000058001664,0.00032147396,0.042359017,0.0013041834,0.0008891612,0.8594144,0.0062346607,0.048316013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008310962,0.00013304077,0.57960427,0.0011550535,0.00018997256,0.0003546144,0.052786846,0.004584076,0.0019161773,0.08852252,0.27043554,0.00023473431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97367394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98487025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8894588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11054122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07977004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8020364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983507877","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0040","title":"Protecting Research Confidentiality : Towards a Research-Participant Shield Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16546054858457637,"score_gpt":0.403462653446372,"score_spread":0.23800210486179563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983507877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0142283095,0.006923479,0.24478675,0.4982389,0.002940579,0.0018703281,0.00034881698,0.00030524464,0.23035762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5022209,0.0070709223,0.16289832,0.26298004,0.005711759,0.006068727,0.0003239452,0.0002722743,0.05245307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7370574,0.17347509,0.012483074,0.018649794,0.050258696,0.008075902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5348292,0.34630874,0.018005786,0.05481104,0.035565354,0.01047986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29495737,0.0009872768,0.00201495,0.0031909675,0.010173123,0.023186231,0.0072568464,0.03762058,0.007569858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31366232,0.0018044611,0.002332073,0.0027822517,0.050903752,0.028924445,0.019146388,0.029429976,0.0031170764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027813696,0.000028660359,0.00045948502,0.0000980122,0.000011806489,0.00010304842,0.002921985,0.00019143647,0.00016759605,0.9824646,0.006631294,0.0068941293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001503992,0.00017603229,0.0005571425,0.0014563678,0.00006993959,0.00033874597,0.0023402534,0.0014831912,0.0010676613,0.8245184,0.16775717,0.00008469465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057180747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044818167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011045251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05884942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86944306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984670992","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086147","title":"On the Book of Job, Justice, and The Precariousness of the Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Law; Injustice; Political science; Mythology; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04706356449537347,"score_gpt":0.27024415678036434,"score_spread":0.22318059228499088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984670992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004046096,0.1233542,0.0027548922,0.14316033,0.010797123,0.000033132732,0.00019184325,0.000059334503,0.71560305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17310923,0.13169374,0.00428014,0.07596897,0.022895463,0.00013848173,0.00037383006,0.00019264495,0.5913476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898404,0.0003780563,0.0000305288,0.0000646458,0.00046911603,0.00007369783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969024,0.002388506,0.00015266158,0.00008580878,0.00034128487,0.00012920327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007590164,0.00042242813,0.00033489167,0.0011634806,0.0027843625,0.005358071,0.00069126976,0.0022020808,0.007925053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004054413,0.00022566882,0.0002396567,0.001654673,0.008551027,0.0037101177,0.000939528,0.0037185948,0.0014418302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016528385,0.000027784068,0.00038331648,0.00018356592,0.000005662543,0.00008565329,0.0025879676,0.00009895086,0.00006144455,0.54768056,0.42115024,0.027718302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070108135,0.000016143436,0.001016489,0.0008764489,0.000005800568,0.00016134596,0.002052309,0.000108652894,0.00007812656,0.1463599,0.8493089,0.00000881738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044814614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014675116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007925053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022469843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003595334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026511967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984726440","doi":"10.7202/043540ar","title":"De certaines tendances en matière de petites créances","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012897054051089377,"score_gpt":0.27945449133245864,"score_spread":0.26655743728136927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984726440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53052956,0.0034008652,0.018473295,0.01477599,0.0003757003,0.00012660473,0.0005365815,0.00022828158,0.43155313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83826655,0.00076610484,0.002411968,0.0010275851,0.00009443452,0.00009652501,0.00013344672,0.00010495492,0.1570984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600214,0.0011499823,0.00016026155,0.0007030746,0.0011967096,0.0007877525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921462,0.002568668,0.0021405262,0.000848744,0.0017765642,0.0005193456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027627584,0.00031357518,0.000283565,0.0013917855,0.00561431,0.0037673907,0.00080687704,0.0016419863,0.01765077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014236025,0.00032706972,0.00039048638,0.0016199449,0.005357103,0.0025329972,0.0030014038,0.0027811895,0.0016604128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013382024,0.000049950973,0.028683612,0.00021159237,0.000035759065,0.0007669754,0.17233418,0.00046271546,0.002726081,0.7084187,0.0153066,0.070870005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015056472,0.00012233373,0.11079426,0.00042159902,0.000030461617,0.0013005474,0.0477484,0.0005559209,0.0031279812,0.034401543,0.801379,0.00010285974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027896844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05599754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027896844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036517528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028825772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05904776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985094360","doi":"10.15209/vulj.v3i1.27","title":"The Growing Acknowledgement of Wrongful Conviction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University Law and Justice Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Conviction; Innocence; Appeal; Acknowledgement; Criminal justice; Political science; Commission; Law; Human rights; Royal Commission; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.014055492732978616,"score_gpt":0.2517591540860538,"score_spread":0.2377036613530752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985094360","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022271195,0.08518614,0.0036852844,0.81563187,0.0091318805,0.000056278346,0.00007970689,0.000092910646,0.06386477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44336155,0.09885452,0.0037526183,0.41449735,0.014567405,0.0001132848,0.00017617301,0.0001587593,0.024518296],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9081156,0.03338348,0.0076741525,0.0072938795,0.038989197,0.004543724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55269134,0.32287842,0.042518187,0.011939984,0.05386467,0.016107447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07286419,0.000323079,0.0012373793,0.006155083,0.005907002,0.013222467,0.0030080688,0.014956672,0.008454796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2144268,0.0009315281,0.0011945234,0.0029049998,0.02365022,0.0121332565,0.015187273,0.022997418,0.0012748939],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007186374,0.00007709478,0.017968599,0.0060111266,0.00012922958,0.0045996564,0.048159838,0.0003287055,0.0019181829,0.22612326,0.30887932,0.38573307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001709327,0.000120022414,0.03473584,0.009528303,0.00008155723,0.006724078,0.028935736,0.00041624444,0.0010271345,0.068763554,0.8494745,0.00017600828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012797318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022470297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07286419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010022328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022432107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38534725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985908656","doi":"10.7202/043537ar","title":"La simplification des procédures spéciales d'administration de la preuve","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02974109185936472,"score_gpt":0.33114762451499785,"score_spread":0.3014065326556331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985908656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17059731,0.015688589,0.13601619,0.0693562,0.010387759,0.0035283063,0.0012167502,0.0043449285,0.588864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20686813,0.0043307585,0.039151777,0.012864439,0.0012720288,0.0014330946,0.00042125312,0.0007940762,0.73286444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985328,0.0037339756,0.0015651317,0.0025750357,0.0038749317,0.002922858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765049,0.01007513,0.001798393,0.002798216,0.00747986,0.0013434595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010045998,0.0009580635,0.0006444894,0.0022581986,0.007178411,0.008589525,0.0019986273,0.007723502,0.024705255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031117305,0.0011714351,0.0016457535,0.001785366,0.0065209484,0.0038352553,0.0053228205,0.0103933895,0.008778362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003693581,0.00043159485,0.004134215,0.0007710324,0.000038878265,0.00071557186,0.022679899,0.0032028551,0.009351781,0.5336151,0.07927151,0.34541813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004669032,0.0002565525,0.0144849345,0.00037185263,0.000034373414,0.00025102205,0.002851486,0.0007786345,0.0039251354,0.009609133,0.9672616,0.000128544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13506934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14611681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13506934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021848485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041779004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2685663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986495945","doi":"10.7202/1026911ar","title":"La complicité par omission : une analyse critique de l’arrêt Rochon c. La Reine","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01989264987192252,"score_gpt":0.30568797239981144,"score_spread":0.2857953225278889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986495945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04699139,0.01959662,0.011098151,0.2571688,0.0028455493,0.000097116026,0.00010884676,0.00011889649,0.6619746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7405405,0.0063806833,0.0018882555,0.045594435,0.0013705782,0.00012621342,0.000044861205,0.00025586353,0.20379856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98292094,0.0061527155,0.00034734077,0.0016244826,0.0068463553,0.002108276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847381,0.0069586267,0.0010029174,0.00077009655,0.005795121,0.00073517684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010200554,0.00089891435,0.0008731746,0.0016860787,0.022344444,0.012272298,0.003245405,0.01174247,0.006915205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016550064,0.0005467857,0.00089600263,0.0019582608,0.041226953,0.005486641,0.0050987103,0.014497604,0.0010828675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023029366,0.000010427754,0.00069106324,0.00011053663,0.000013200346,0.00080697343,0.12262412,0.00015108335,0.0002156431,0.81137097,0.05535668,0.008626272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012410738,0.000019973177,0.0021941697,0.00075395027,0.000031600634,0.0004683485,0.0517574,0.0004721807,0.00037435052,0.05382236,0.89002174,0.00007159235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6443964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67531925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35560358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04749897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039286204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71539557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987359688","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0014","title":"The Logic of the Rule of Law: Lessons from Willis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; CLARITY; Rule of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03158620901448495,"score_gpt":0.28454818479866695,"score_spread":0.252961975784182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987359688","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03113372,0.050796624,0.02412228,0.47314975,0.0028840867,0.000036351026,0.00012846291,0.00016391359,0.41758493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868365,0.01921442,0.007985338,0.025288073,0.00426008,0.000068139365,0.000055767803,0.00017047867,0.056121215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954081,0.0024372037,0.00016014521,0.000504382,0.001103152,0.0003868552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904565,0.0070110667,0.0003684402,0.00069632864,0.0010051673,0.00046254866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008743367,0.00049874,0.00093938794,0.0019172144,0.0065275226,0.00995372,0.0017430028,0.005769941,0.0023969589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014706742,0.00065695297,0.00065857254,0.0016099473,0.049031086,0.014961414,0.003624591,0.00854001,0.0007571328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003503262,0.0000058173514,0.00006263226,0.0000111112595,0.000001836456,0.0000420692,0.001325641,0.00015423242,0.000009832677,0.9920053,0.0048812116,0.001496817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007498664,0.0000064115134,0.000112906375,0.000068620815,0.0000030333338,0.00004295156,0.0008282549,0.00067099684,0.000046144145,0.9314818,0.0667207,0.000010656734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044956226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022653718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044956226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013628456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010522675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987899877","doi":"10.7202/042507ar","title":"Les erreurs de droit dans l'exercice d'une compétence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Allegation; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.021789314995727397,"score_gpt":0.2959621394531882,"score_spread":0.27417282445746083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987899877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40682757,0.018866338,0.05101414,0.035942417,0.0007295125,0.00030734733,0.0003503143,0.00017461093,0.4857878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96704155,0.0031865046,0.007206664,0.00087273435,0.0002233553,0.00009996215,0.00007160759,0.000034466913,0.02126327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636035,0.010479825,0.0017797031,0.0023949915,0.01976196,0.0019800528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9068186,0.06746345,0.008346358,0.004784371,0.010446787,0.0021404398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028262364,0.00059450173,0.0006827826,0.003462127,0.0038713284,0.014677778,0.0015987646,0.003851573,0.0061757513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1331646,0.00047430015,0.00078517717,0.001995798,0.017086254,0.009383309,0.0036364875,0.006816236,0.00077691465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021309368,0.00012181958,0.02089713,0.00046491544,0.00012429383,0.0024219637,0.0469917,0.0015663357,0.0029062012,0.78925705,0.0040313527,0.13100411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000245316,0.0006145286,0.12475498,0.003551423,0.00023614807,0.006637555,0.047439095,0.005008154,0.017165951,0.33570012,0.4580842,0.0005624872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052378245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04603696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052378245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00774837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009815441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14946747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988242259","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2006.35.3.197","title":"Occupiers' Liability in England and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Liability; Legislature; Law; Tort; Position (finance); Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.021784751265324344,"score_gpt":0.3100154524167192,"score_spread":0.2882307011513948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988242259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56925696,0.24221878,0.00042354787,0.051248953,0.0006681568,0.00009430823,0.0022819024,0.00003531591,0.13377213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957691,0.08043797,0.0002799405,0.0053371433,0.00014906669,0.000022142314,0.0005870264,0.000014673343,0.01740287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501956,0.00030179866,0.00023660675,0.0003507813,0.0025522977,0.0015389696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98809624,0.0018870251,0.0015237777,0.00013381618,0.006538108,0.0018211639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002505742,0.00016820339,0.00048636043,0.0038990076,0.0042521977,0.0043228013,0.0011257076,0.0014502812,0.0031294045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103111565,0.00040157366,0.00029794936,0.0062576793,0.0026061002,0.00097035733,0.0014904935,0.0015449057,0.0001708912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081184,0.00018606787,0.24994987,0.0034289034,0.00032211284,0.004706312,0.036360282,0.004871609,0.0019138505,0.22842863,0.13080555,0.33821496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666672,0.000104390405,0.68660206,0.0019194403,0.00020103631,0.00050913077,0.013545638,0.00039537714,0.0004726231,0.0017584646,0.29426485,0.00016034878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99665916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11045995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11045995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15522723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8014468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988893329","doi":"10.7202/042941ar","title":"La compétence des tribunaux administratifs en matière de Charte","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021645477171097487,"score_gpt":0.2976565219879077,"score_spread":0.2760110448168102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988893329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20573509,0.004557017,0.028339818,0.06894159,0.00091793033,0.000574935,0.00045265481,0.00039198544,0.6900889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7993397,0.0015430355,0.008209131,0.0029907573,0.00018635926,0.00018097734,0.00024333243,0.00015285233,0.18715385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95916885,0.018560681,0.0026894843,0.0030357412,0.012199004,0.0043462683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93116164,0.021826733,0.00544325,0.007542344,0.026592039,0.007433969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039459117,0.00031774014,0.0006448864,0.0024944013,0.009031061,0.022499707,0.0015629086,0.0036078843,0.015838908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084877595,0.00055119424,0.0005130828,0.0026608522,0.009543219,0.008270573,0.0057016048,0.0054898057,0.0034808365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007726642,0.00013037708,0.014052674,0.00019633946,0.00003165415,0.00053365994,0.093893595,0.00081758085,0.0016869545,0.76305467,0.02957328,0.09595192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033116725,0.00017224759,0.037286367,0.000727091,0.000025976962,0.00048356748,0.05816354,0.0015302764,0.0026862207,0.05915782,0.83953905,0.0001946625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09053403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08592983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09053403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012781887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03926295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2086823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988982783","doi":"10.7202/042498ar","title":"« La Loi canadienne sur les droits de la personne » : une Charte méconnue","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Redress; Charter; Law; Legislation; Fundamental rights; Commission; Statute","score_opus":0.012542228335321868,"score_gpt":0.2580288492947892,"score_spread":0.24548662095946733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988982783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018190876,0.052847736,0.008519069,0.12960443,0.0022166,0.00019003093,0.0015783209,0.00018924206,0.78666365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5738839,0.030593006,0.016820502,0.037399087,0.0013536742,0.0003695379,0.00076661946,0.00017441042,0.33863938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288285,0.0010813962,0.0002260962,0.0005466493,0.003991341,0.001271733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961443,0.0014513915,0.00020550373,0.0001887109,0.0016648811,0.00034515516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041847904,0.00065350684,0.0005532715,0.0032145965,0.013043158,0.013365281,0.0017377441,0.0048499163,0.0062173787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009673277,0.0004935401,0.00046907485,0.0031840967,0.019691067,0.0036371686,0.0022139286,0.008950001,0.0008808853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014723231,0.000006574935,0.0006763266,0.00010480792,0.0000040399905,0.00015356742,0.008629483,0.00016700201,0.00022624955,0.9125023,0.056799483,0.020715484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009293361,0.00000843685,0.0035818184,0.00037659262,0.0000112578,0.00012303104,0.003357526,0.00013077092,0.00035821754,0.02586376,0.9661306,0.000048635575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97187275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051038735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051038735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102608286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37031364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989843759","doi":"10.7202/042908ar","title":"L'arrêt Morgentaler et l'article 7 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de l'Abitibi Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Charter; Confusion; Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.013575874446780382,"score_gpt":0.2944263822160566,"score_spread":0.2808505077692762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989843759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027877562,0.04324821,0.0040665874,0.28406715,0.007877573,0.0001875809,0.0007277492,0.00014746904,0.63180006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39996228,0.020598102,0.007927957,0.17704614,0.003896738,0.00029858784,0.00041722113,0.00017393062,0.38967904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243647,0.0010721916,0.00020410209,0.0005233815,0.004247592,0.0015162381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952779,0.0024666127,0.0003406103,0.00018232607,0.0013921731,0.00034033772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047422666,0.00058872043,0.00060415803,0.0013882548,0.0069971895,0.008433532,0.0017990316,0.009232424,0.005174099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012908134,0.00050800346,0.001000097,0.0012689413,0.006621202,0.0016376964,0.0015386151,0.0088768285,0.00070755236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020588146,0.000016187816,0.00079591933,0.000117335534,0.0000147209685,0.0004107091,0.0029998547,0.00019602088,0.00041879408,0.8317663,0.15091178,0.012331797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014607714,0.000024743304,0.0053768796,0.0003258247,0.00002486195,0.00014750764,0.0015106812,0.00016211286,0.0006906029,0.0177054,0.97395134,0.000065480715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74641186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8563748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25358814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019336874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034572065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989924674","doi":"10.7202/043799ar","title":"Les agents de sécurité privée doivent-ils respecter les droits conférés par la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026359456369177265,"score_gpt":0.2985724691073548,"score_spread":0.27221301273817755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989924674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029314388,0.006530938,0.0044845277,0.19680041,0.0017917996,0.000049118345,0.00021990277,0.000067835244,0.7607411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6621803,0.0063505676,0.002378916,0.019067425,0.000805277,0.00008414651,0.00022783142,0.00013475279,0.3087708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943984,0.0020289796,0.000120168406,0.0006106524,0.0011038395,0.0017378498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530125,0.0011964937,0.0005449469,0.0005375874,0.0013877373,0.0010320236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004088965,0.00039240092,0.00048149182,0.00086611474,0.008069148,0.014528279,0.0013373577,0.004890427,0.040062834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011061463,0.00034353166,0.00044260392,0.0014147352,0.009196948,0.009241579,0.003854254,0.006306907,0.0069926684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019168416,0.00002284461,0.0022916172,0.000055460943,0.000008497014,0.0001289733,0.009689696,0.00012335672,0.00008999976,0.9546044,0.022059737,0.010906311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014539908,0.000023143486,0.0044031977,0.0003631504,0.00001105927,0.00013864298,0.015509569,0.00026315585,0.0001935671,0.08977722,0.88926446,0.000038295027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12861644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87138355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011062557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02099005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25573564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991217914","doi":"10.7202/042309ar","title":"Uniformité et efficacité des garanties en matière de libertés publiques","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Legislature; Parliament; Civil liberties; Government (linguistics); Officer; Public administration; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.015508466007953163,"score_gpt":0.29170993226630554,"score_spread":0.2762014662583524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991217914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024490569,0.028086223,0.026123691,0.046736903,0.0016646476,0.000292495,0.0018298661,0.0009632124,0.8698125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5023163,0.02447808,0.05330857,0.007839105,0.0015915213,0.0005143129,0.001604817,0.0007730944,0.40757427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94577116,0.009347142,0.002480289,0.0035199174,0.032276683,0.006604819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97230756,0.0076445923,0.0016874704,0.005272581,0.0110480515,0.002039756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02812574,0.00080153655,0.00095002644,0.0054588267,0.005469197,0.01404615,0.0022051886,0.0027477199,0.014872582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046430957,0.00086767296,0.0013316586,0.0050540506,0.012576384,0.0056237523,0.004421778,0.005651051,0.004095475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005529206,0.00003524556,0.0031859954,0.00025387068,0.00004035143,0.0001100107,0.0032679786,0.0007646684,0.00080423895,0.86584157,0.025611768,0.100029044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006339969,0.000087515684,0.030664051,0.0008435011,0.00006651045,0.00033956888,0.0014890532,0.0014907954,0.0015774027,0.048177417,0.9151035,0.00009736636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6779603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6244393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6779603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045458093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07094673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64787257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991254034","doi":"10.7202/042224ar","title":"Les abus de pouvoir et de fonction en droit pénal canadien","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013405646616204765,"score_gpt":0.29709917492226173,"score_spread":0.283693528306057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991254034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56056285,0.023249963,0.005404603,0.033352125,0.0008138324,0.00005657772,0.000702429,0.00014147593,0.3757162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455864,0.007863035,0.0011855564,0.00081996975,0.00034486363,0.0000580302,0.0001620271,0.000059042268,0.043921098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423754,0.002481476,0.00013649152,0.0003507808,0.0021859054,0.0006076877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98801863,0.0079157865,0.001382201,0.0005272493,0.0013861003,0.0007701497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030426811,0.00074450806,0.0004892953,0.003216929,0.0033042687,0.006156828,0.0006774615,0.00245316,0.0110467365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02743059,0.00035334897,0.0004803025,0.0031274415,0.007815197,0.0034164183,0.0021964984,0.0061836736,0.0010607085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032055774,0.00024331867,0.049843617,0.00029143627,0.00012412867,0.0027728842,0.054900814,0.0019583132,0.0012989612,0.71101534,0.01337302,0.16385756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008427168,0.00024376866,0.3952038,0.0012269138,0.00012717705,0.003982623,0.038781654,0.002782547,0.0018071763,0.092681915,0.4628179,0.00026017707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12863879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104403175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007921376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032707525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2557801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991470258","doi":"10.7202/1000616ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Art. 1053 C.C. Revolutionized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02704984100598097,"score_gpt":0.31607487544745744,"score_spread":0.2890250344414765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991470258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006478658,0.021113658,0.0022746306,0.08630948,0.004607632,0.00024818102,0.0012782583,0.00031199696,0.8773775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2327876,0.008678809,0.0040488285,0.2603966,0.0045977873,0.0008641953,0.00060501933,0.00025584473,0.48776522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992477,0.0010737318,0.00038512002,0.0013194224,0.003198598,0.0015461665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978592,0.00079950655,0.00026201003,0.000282042,0.0006773105,0.0001198435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005205406,0.0011779061,0.00066897745,0.0016765624,0.0072580623,0.0071778432,0.0029860667,0.020962108,0.011477315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011037967,0.0010125214,0.0013900495,0.0013399528,0.006997597,0.003629373,0.0033500749,0.016243907,0.004819879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059339167,0.000023895824,0.00046871652,0.00011267793,0.000017139002,0.00021939828,0.0014925115,0.00009558091,0.0005006432,0.6442448,0.34077618,0.01198911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004903216,0.000038505685,0.001849411,0.0003966157,0.00005995024,0.00020829124,0.0002277001,0.00016406288,0.0012611034,0.031906556,0.96376073,0.000078113684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15539794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22263975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84460205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012420871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011758261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30898684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991906732","doi":"10.7202/043536ar","title":"Une réflexion sur l'unification de certains recours extraordinaires","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024626958968824053,"score_gpt":0.2913163589910314,"score_spread":0.26668940002220737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991906732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059043087,0.022700654,0.11147279,0.2849339,0.008334399,0.00016483826,0.0007403263,0.00036202997,0.512248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8463582,0.005908754,0.027013341,0.029215313,0.004603577,0.0003238431,0.00030454452,0.0004303979,0.08584207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982806,0.0059679872,0.0012996318,0.0048709335,0.0039109425,0.0011445265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701249,0.017424518,0.0017060052,0.004621672,0.005386535,0.0007363355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019811967,0.000686578,0.0009649226,0.0031644204,0.0076433453,0.01293289,0.0029900388,0.0072148275,0.0073943436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0303837,0.00059576187,0.0011593545,0.002465207,0.03262747,0.024804842,0.0076064165,0.013931375,0.0012087564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019100102,0.0000072874977,0.0003891526,0.000056710316,0.000010163277,0.000054551932,0.008688863,0.000047330766,0.00017843887,0.97769177,0.0050015575,0.007855011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021816133,0.000035176177,0.0036110021,0.00057151896,0.000047023725,0.00031967807,0.009903439,0.00044475828,0.0012955392,0.63522226,0.3484546,0.0000731667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010193143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011592558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019811967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077258376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006601363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10477698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992039950","doi":"10.7202/017296ar","title":"L’enjeu des années 1990 : la police, les tribunaux et les municipalités","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victimisation; SAFER; Declaration; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.554087134116249,"score_gpt":0.48311021026143636,"score_spread":0.07097692385481263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992039950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23421633,0.10938608,0.0031308052,0.28722307,0.0027597107,0.00017801963,0.0024946153,0.0000914313,0.36051992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82999474,0.022701764,0.0022999968,0.022956226,0.00047939672,0.00015745258,0.000849169,0.00004958549,0.120511726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744534,0.00090765423,0.000068810354,0.0001380888,0.00063751376,0.0008025133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969879,0.0008813195,0.00028433625,0.00009903334,0.001286599,0.00046098616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024060614,0.00032510152,0.0003362284,0.0018462365,0.009672236,0.00560529,0.0010356564,0.0026988392,0.007769074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008087485,0.00039757602,0.00029346376,0.0031491525,0.0052532093,0.002380315,0.0015991308,0.00325302,0.0005223301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013932426,0.00015587099,0.057527058,0.000677584,0.00006642356,0.0013077061,0.05774357,0.0013025707,0.0006736186,0.43475732,0.27560043,0.17004842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022413695,0.00003820735,0.13349836,0.00073090824,0.000022963874,0.00018967486,0.02189414,0.00024777552,0.0002553053,0.0046719145,0.8383767,0.000051552557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0526121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07227128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38172925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992178576","doi":"10.7202/042616ar","title":"Les articles 8, 9 et 10 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Political science; Warrant; Charter; Search and seizure; Imprisonment; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.020471757379708282,"score_gpt":0.3039930866126004,"score_spread":0.2835213292328921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992178576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005239826,0.0080641,0.006426956,0.04169156,0.010998612,0.002121834,0.014921631,0.0009291043,0.90960634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040721152,0.00715367,0.017908795,0.038325947,0.0019048557,0.00254942,0.007648409,0.00052993256,0.88325775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702537,0.0017026296,0.0015525536,0.0013467617,0.020416677,0.0047277184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97207063,0.006642921,0.0010647255,0.0015226128,0.016722407,0.0019767766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076441523,0.0013531793,0.0012975786,0.0044076894,0.010992437,0.01430343,0.0033952198,0.016201245,0.03594842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031387415,0.0017301043,0.0018479166,0.004430279,0.007662691,0.0027242582,0.001950163,0.014104919,0.018002113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005429949,0.00006707305,0.0008167306,0.00022960594,0.000011612433,0.0002876382,0.0013554434,0.00036118724,0.00066831696,0.23846386,0.74065185,0.017032415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020939337,0.000016379769,0.0032988386,0.0002255734,0.000008187241,0.00008648444,0.00035385686,0.000094553834,0.00033305553,0.004177435,0.9912977,0.00008698745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94927347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06032002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052166928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16804188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37849927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994123105","doi":"10.7202/017385ar","title":"Les décisions pénales dans les causes d’homicide au tribunal de Montréal, de 1985 à 1989","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Tribunal; Sentence; Criminology; Prison; Law; Political science; Charge (physics); Psychology; History; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Philosophy; Physics; Medical emergency; Linguistics","score_opus":0.39805796921806147,"score_gpt":0.43167488392183995,"score_spread":0.03361691470377848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994123105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97587204,0.0030479047,0.0006414063,0.0053120875,0.00007266768,0.00017555595,0.0008314615,0.000032957465,0.014013804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98614293,0.0011436974,0.00049258774,0.00023312887,0.000044784567,0.00005335851,0.00026774203,0.000006188046,0.011615563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968644,0.00065505045,0.000089952904,0.00013984095,0.0010013783,0.0012493723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709547,0.0007995799,0.0009107068,0.00007134187,0.00063859485,0.00048418733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769271,0.0005435044,0.00023045836,0.0015415378,0.0036526793,0.001748742,0.0009179434,0.0009730328,0.0042678677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009488362,0.00036231606,0.00046285806,0.0010713771,0.0015349246,0.00044688862,0.00090142054,0.0013844847,0.00039222665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067490357,0.00028682224,0.7146486,0.00020513633,0.00022267466,0.0075627263,0.009417935,0.008164544,0.0033759568,0.023233056,0.020248054,0.21195963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045791876,0.00011175096,0.96621335,0.00006507438,0.000037241316,0.0006428383,0.0025108708,0.0016900925,0.0011950311,0.0005041713,0.026941089,0.00004274317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8839009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9484354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11609912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027289081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138745075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23356563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994914693","doi":"10.7202/043037ar","title":"L'élargissement du concept de « détention », premier jalon d'une véritable protection contre l'auto-incrimination?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013695211145672783,"score_gpt":0.26640633489518234,"score_spread":0.25271112374950955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994914693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08547442,0.025357064,0.052922495,0.39897442,0.0058927285,0.00011455606,0.0001632482,0.00011733822,0.43098378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259118,0.0048497184,0.008448425,0.019702645,0.0019151233,0.00010843188,0.00005050752,0.000057193018,0.038956147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870547,0.008418103,0.00040994564,0.0010483334,0.0021251934,0.00094374805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890949,0.005242748,0.0015831667,0.0015191052,0.0017401844,0.0008197913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006938267,0.00042335916,0.00053097215,0.0011568954,0.004454009,0.007187663,0.0023514312,0.0047618053,0.005239933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016249852,0.00024676754,0.00045511237,0.0009681904,0.038075417,0.009626621,0.0052138055,0.008563425,0.0009537584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002101759,0.000013830574,0.00047606032,0.000090210335,0.000004506165,0.00006890397,0.007121037,0.0000784805,0.00016400791,0.9746635,0.0036288484,0.01366962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024728723,0.000090970105,0.0035261256,0.0010159755,0.000020756735,0.00070086966,0.01981272,0.000809651,0.0008313641,0.62349343,0.34959218,0.00008121779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009839468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009917283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009839468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044640806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008030486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036693513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996793311","doi":"10.7202/043888ar","title":"La notion d’expertise du décideur administratif aux fins de l’application de la méthode pragmatique et fonctionnelle","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02119113621968625,"score_gpt":0.32270194741927943,"score_spread":0.30151081119959317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996793311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031753857,0.0036254635,0.7535908,0.01982141,0.00036127912,0.00037294216,0.00034574507,0.0006062474,0.18952227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.593736,0.0023013738,0.35835734,0.0021871068,0.00030748858,0.00065877073,0.0003756085,0.00054231624,0.041534036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95855814,0.022547843,0.0018548288,0.005861051,0.009381675,0.0017964112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434621,0.03486038,0.0025600465,0.0076286145,0.010051667,0.0014372781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025027446,0.0013119646,0.0012209888,0.003653818,0.0042494307,0.013997386,0.00253027,0.0041897236,0.012167602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059199065,0.0009112582,0.0019289339,0.0034610033,0.017908555,0.013167178,0.005800582,0.005296529,0.002812502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000789314,0.000058831854,0.0033294377,0.00061103696,0.00008576834,0.00021316906,0.019533373,0.0038863088,0.0019394009,0.88689137,0.0040199924,0.07935243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060053397,0.00012158281,0.0066389623,0.0014449466,0.00013628125,0.0005597134,0.010608535,0.020511681,0.007120397,0.6821083,0.27051225,0.00017735905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04000749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024666462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04000749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012520277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01635294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13235933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996793615","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.2.121","title":"Showing Remorse: Reflections on the Gap between Expression and Attribution in Cases of Wrongful Conviction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Conviction; Criminal Conviction; Psychology; Disposition; Criminal justice; Attribution; Expression (computer science); Criminology; Inclusion (mineral); Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2878678158405966,"score_gpt":0.3872231436201995,"score_spread":0.09935532777960288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996793615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55987805,0.009432128,0.015056558,0.27949017,0.0015927422,0.00008925025,0.00005553726,0.00008781813,0.13431776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948854,0.00060380285,0.0004380009,0.002594505,0.00011521702,0.000022153037,0.000007675162,0.000022388576,0.001310913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93275654,0.047798928,0.0022693817,0.0024517726,0.0077050263,0.00701838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93251944,0.050805066,0.0054536206,0.0031869598,0.0058413916,0.0021935657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051647153,0.00044997619,0.00081975514,0.0035805546,0.0150421625,0.013364237,0.004756653,0.00878333,0.0021763283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1356381,0.000718244,0.00073817425,0.0025040812,0.10688457,0.014112817,0.020635245,0.016032418,0.00023450713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055347544,0.000021261882,0.0037126373,0.000091689464,0.000011105398,0.0015356743,0.8495748,0.00007569804,0.00041857708,0.1298635,0.001552663,0.013087085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008442141,0.000022790562,0.006265819,0.0005145086,0.000015100437,0.0015341064,0.91708404,0.00019943347,0.00070909713,0.046288192,0.027286407,0.00007210531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06092736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050526902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06092736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018026538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010505303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27313954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997095232","doi":"10.7202/042410ar","title":"Le recours en cassation dans le contentieux municipal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Offensive; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02101771330191722,"score_gpt":0.28367808232866965,"score_spread":0.26266036902675244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997095232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18285358,0.0026836398,0.0056760777,0.010908935,0.0006137754,0.00015498394,0.0012951734,0.00039333053,0.7954204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5785295,0.0011775022,0.0022106664,0.00089517044,0.00017506584,0.00005860074,0.00033083884,0.00011962408,0.41650304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956306,0.00079516135,0.00016014006,0.00039185578,0.002030839,0.0009913333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953187,0.001549989,0.00039273044,0.00046644677,0.0018549416,0.00041708854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024913833,0.0002838114,0.00043019504,0.0018837721,0.0111493375,0.006500197,0.001032838,0.0014832534,0.023192825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099152755,0.00031810233,0.0004032447,0.002349688,0.0036770746,0.0015438426,0.0021920507,0.0032972076,0.002642799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014864725,0.00004329972,0.015121449,0.00020122656,0.000048349077,0.0021518082,0.043877047,0.0008943945,0.0022204982,0.7867037,0.065152384,0.08343719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001394104,0.000035529927,0.023069382,0.00017204015,0.00003534594,0.00040605696,0.011708004,0.00057827367,0.0024070023,0.0065580695,0.95495605,0.000060345374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.716459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8213012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.716459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021434106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019082239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5704217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997241629","doi":"10.7202/043913ar","title":"La refonte du régime québécois d’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels : les révélations du droit français","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018878539718168635,"score_gpt":0.2597696980384871,"score_spread":0.24089115832031846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997241629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76607955,0.0051103556,0.0014561026,0.0577578,0.00023606406,0.0000612995,0.00021151543,0.000011581024,0.1690758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96954554,0.0017149053,0.00028043595,0.0023972176,0.000026184029,0.000024845924,0.0000367672,0.00000521618,0.025968846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826163,0.00047121782,0.000026407386,0.00015828002,0.0003044942,0.00077792996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725693,0.0007347947,0.00040104106,0.00013213496,0.0009114217,0.00056375674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017902426,0.00026125458,0.00028614607,0.0011287981,0.011826459,0.00403548,0.0007804348,0.0022253373,0.00831824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003783739,0.00019378844,0.00022216818,0.0013729498,0.0074633206,0.0020640553,0.0014324418,0.0027409275,0.0003223056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020724807,0.000115322764,0.0953341,0.00028923043,0.00007911027,0.0023849523,0.27375028,0.00062637054,0.0019578086,0.5258385,0.030461816,0.068955265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046896894,0.000103391496,0.30742243,0.0011589369,0.00008354202,0.00055640796,0.3520102,0.0012850706,0.0012526758,0.01843718,0.31748295,0.00016028163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9187037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9562519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029996812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024517732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21764314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000590209","doi":"10.7202/043973ar","title":"Gestion d’instance, proportionnalité et preuve civile : état provisoire des questions","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.018963876523958235,"score_gpt":0.29195471022201464,"score_spread":0.2729908336980564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000590209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12582271,0.006467926,0.007367242,0.16257964,0.00046055496,0.000050971856,0.00022778194,0.00004983799,0.6969733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92879623,0.0019863402,0.0012355634,0.009305547,0.00021812692,0.000044524106,0.000048839713,0.00005524383,0.058309585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351466,0.0028581892,0.00011898956,0.001006695,0.0012371452,0.0012642123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937131,0.0024904427,0.00065113936,0.0008161032,0.001466202,0.00086297776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050046155,0.0002680718,0.00040177163,0.00084576104,0.009543124,0.011763233,0.0014452704,0.003595278,0.011165062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010446851,0.00029109823,0.00033948087,0.0012717649,0.035791993,0.005580486,0.0040136944,0.0052640075,0.0008660137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011582792,0.0000088096895,0.0015712738,0.000025639822,0.0000053758595,0.000065435815,0.01657625,0.00007603482,0.000110083995,0.96562916,0.00674897,0.00917135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023432849,0.000035647612,0.018929137,0.00043429088,0.00002796674,0.00020544148,0.048607577,0.00045378937,0.000701925,0.2148972,0.7156189,0.000064641645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39988273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47673336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39988273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027916187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020686701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79511034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000798285","doi":"10.7202/1027455ar","title":"Responsabilité, justice et procédure pénale comparée","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03844232178104873,"score_gpt":0.3174339752331102,"score_spread":0.27899165345206145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000798285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21442056,0.0067795906,0.012141866,0.04136548,0.00080028974,0.000058620753,0.00005179024,0.00004315911,0.72433877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493637,0.0016336486,0.0011810852,0.0024916963,0.000111905785,0.00005277829,0.000014529112,0.000035982746,0.045114685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108386,0.005365494,0.00019907841,0.0005888023,0.0013686551,0.001394198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953616,0.0025238458,0.0006516668,0.00032303703,0.0007156099,0.00042422628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036683362,0.00040542748,0.00041410644,0.0013342737,0.009131296,0.009047959,0.0010147392,0.002976811,0.0065681967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008478787,0.0002244232,0.00044158302,0.0010681282,0.023079833,0.0052202446,0.005724558,0.0053720768,0.00065317185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001530038,0.000021280817,0.0017769033,0.000037364956,0.000005506603,0.000210183,0.091922864,0.00011632186,0.00016636282,0.89306074,0.0023193795,0.010347697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016206799,0.00012479287,0.017806802,0.00074335176,0.000025802246,0.0012984026,0.21939023,0.00075500057,0.001309026,0.19178274,0.566613,0.00013451981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03591972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042580523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03591972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006813966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006360794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071421325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003043951","doi":"10.7202/1013033ar","title":"L’abus de droit : l’anténorme — Partie 1","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06907063178431219,"score_gpt":0.33019011628675987,"score_spread":0.2611194845024477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003043951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026468279,0.003956536,0.0050291475,0.008617509,0.00017735177,0.000033321954,0.00009178777,0.000031062053,0.9555951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75956947,0.00286922,0.0018699646,0.003157846,0.00025945713,0.00007605899,0.000108968066,0.000098262666,0.2319908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972664,0.0009533685,0.000079670055,0.00040929654,0.000715741,0.00057548087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988182,0.0005795705,0.00009436979,0.00013567648,0.0002649689,0.00010713382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016052374,0.00045151007,0.00030384873,0.0014772142,0.006328124,0.006641018,0.00085940043,0.002636122,0.012811363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025462783,0.00032812287,0.0005829603,0.0013007326,0.016519738,0.0043053934,0.0032142682,0.0041280673,0.0015328629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004487768,0.0000041791677,0.0002569606,0.0000151715,0.0000017113495,0.00005624374,0.003637629,0.000046725767,0.000068841255,0.9912708,0.0021253128,0.0025120426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014374908,0.000044410495,0.004758019,0.0004735812,0.000016320004,0.00038581513,0.008654909,0.0005891753,0.0005780453,0.25438496,0.73006,0.000040441348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07408409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077469505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07408409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009234596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049643293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14730579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003393265","doi":"10.7202/042696ar","title":"L'effectivité des jugements en droit administratif canadien et québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Enforcement; Tort; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Property (philosophy); Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01425839074361596,"score_gpt":0.2929743795174464,"score_spread":0.27871598877383047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003393265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94325066,0.0039105206,0.00022962874,0.0057054064,0.000094990886,0.00006747449,0.00067947106,0.000025173658,0.046036694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719204,0.0014872833,0.00016941328,0.0005670147,0.00003803641,0.000033528177,0.0001924736,0.000011846611,0.025580069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923866,0.0038809874,0.00013009513,0.00040849228,0.0021326193,0.0010611806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96563065,0.018752988,0.004268824,0.0009271873,0.0069801067,0.0034402914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007971896,0.0005418249,0.00076961773,0.0016963629,0.0039229332,0.0045934822,0.0013406269,0.0018014618,0.014369039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03515125,0.000256799,0.00075818907,0.002282295,0.003491397,0.0014569903,0.0013058698,0.002447144,0.00072437455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024129117,0.002154014,0.7725808,0.0004515261,0.0013265839,0.0016891772,0.034970745,0.003147851,0.0009212547,0.020773372,0.0225615,0.13701022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019171718,0.0007191139,0.94435614,0.0003394098,0.00044066593,0.00015165975,0.013771278,0.0013773656,0.0006202816,0.0015558257,0.036390692,0.00008593573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96686405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98049265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041165855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041165855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021261934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2986806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003467181","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0033","title":"The Transformation of Canadian Property Rights?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02176375831598557,"score_gpt":0.252186807063797,"score_spread":0.23042304874781142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003467181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058841474,0.0025724329,0.0009974105,0.022887602,0.00016340544,0.00004418614,0.00048507538,0.00004039376,0.91396797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203946,0.0024377794,0.0006638621,0.0015938526,0.000053805914,0.000023273833,0.00018897896,0.00001823891,0.074625656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975268,0.00016581021,0.000039912575,0.00026236326,0.0011118588,0.0008932549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848026,0.00024029463,0.00011657061,0.00015749532,0.00077372126,0.00023173925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001156539,0.00035510198,0.00027116312,0.0028810205,0.0134406425,0.007848679,0.0011147711,0.0015318583,0.017564816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044046585,0.00021402627,0.0003314508,0.005153119,0.015584481,0.0034056245,0.002677063,0.0021066063,0.00047589967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843615,0.000008064388,0.0021113218,0.000040673818,0.000005097358,0.00015926403,0.0084160585,0.00030571886,0.00015377598,0.95728236,0.012350758,0.019148264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026401378,0.000021471147,0.03973965,0.00032269474,0.000035665646,0.00027664698,0.027931185,0.0009202502,0.0006307815,0.13212627,0.7978833,0.00008570287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113425955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113425955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0827339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82296675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003472309","doi":"10.7202/017271ar","title":"L’alcool au volant, c’est criminel depuis 1921 !","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Legislation; Publicity; Criminal code; Law enforcement; Drunk drivers; Parliament; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Criminal law; Enforcement; Drunk driving; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Politics; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.4824835799520262,"score_gpt":0.4458425143745009,"score_spread":0.03664106557752528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003472309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115690365,0.06770095,0.008936796,0.15594763,0.009759614,0.00030038483,0.0056222025,0.00079796114,0.63524413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31534055,0.013947663,0.0034300173,0.012525719,0.0008460838,0.000098579374,0.001135486,0.00030328988,0.6523727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700326,0.0005594956,0.000068177476,0.00041461727,0.0012984604,0.0006559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688846,0.00082108413,0.0002726803,0.0001346936,0.0014536968,0.0004292966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017353344,0.0010144932,0.0006327101,0.0017587068,0.00941311,0.006488598,0.0008991268,0.0019872815,0.053492166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010344873,0.00040832465,0.00073152466,0.0019609353,0.0035387469,0.0025320158,0.0011033267,0.003762724,0.0051188627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004433368,0.00012629158,0.046299543,0.0006875043,0.00018823594,0.0025830981,0.021727664,0.00080921827,0.0028762615,0.22353919,0.43737257,0.26334718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012027535,0.000026782027,0.031362128,0.00014774996,0.00001661905,0.00033377195,0.0033753235,0.00019298254,0.00062064914,0.0013918397,0.96247977,0.0000404213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93394387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085590005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03085693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022468671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22388375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003784538","doi":"10.7202/1000627ar","title":"Les rapports entre le droit administratif et les droits et libertés : la révision judiciaire ou le contrôle constitutionnel ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862416366487741,"score_gpt":0.32793883425570025,"score_spread":0.24169719760692615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003784538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0700768,0.017943578,0.01629313,0.20968607,0.0011869299,0.00011044453,0.00016918532,0.00013288794,0.68440104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8607372,0.0037184532,0.0030470658,0.02336373,0.0004547401,0.00008415738,0.000043402717,0.00007805481,0.10847318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99031395,0.0028662635,0.00025875907,0.0013387277,0.003077189,0.0021450242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953803,0.001950562,0.0005493869,0.0005477996,0.0011427468,0.00042921223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067717903,0.0004908075,0.0006086071,0.00096844364,0.008284222,0.012609664,0.001962914,0.006744006,0.006894906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009841577,0.00033254785,0.00060639036,0.0010786889,0.022269823,0.0063720997,0.0040359707,0.009242933,0.0009959788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012756291,0.000007996092,0.00047013734,0.00002223432,0.0000052613427,0.00009093868,0.0053928196,0.00009473331,0.00021420633,0.98247004,0.005407059,0.0058119665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004341515,0.00006181869,0.0072629945,0.0006210615,0.000043708656,0.00021982317,0.014405794,0.0008320174,0.0021074153,0.3486271,0.62565243,0.00012235796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2604135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3184528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024656316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03171979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51779544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003991614","doi":"10.7202/038893ar","title":"The Confessions Rule and the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Silence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Charter; Bill of rights; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02090596218630384,"score_gpt":0.31377633744655514,"score_spread":0.2928703752602513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003991614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009359814,0.0058884607,0.015359883,0.10901466,0.004605004,0.00037147762,0.0010175755,0.0003061864,0.85407686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37873134,0.006486927,0.030099278,0.106095344,0.003507661,0.000681429,0.0012749754,0.00033149333,0.47279155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716727,0.003039261,0.0010844499,0.002532924,0.016727546,0.004943069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858825,0.0038268736,0.00061148516,0.0010114476,0.007634746,0.0010329718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009578248,0.00065553235,0.0006395162,0.0015624483,0.009136008,0.010938308,0.003553978,0.011850663,0.007176664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026603306,0.00080830767,0.001008066,0.0013693151,0.015956666,0.0032491279,0.0022924251,0.01495245,0.0021961953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132539635,0.000006054095,0.000114258546,0.000026893995,0.0000026115233,0.00008795541,0.00053842703,0.00014184276,0.00016760087,0.94425505,0.04914101,0.005505094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006576662,0.000049505812,0.001954686,0.00029833426,0.00003738299,0.00020310393,0.0007309413,0.0011555414,0.001177664,0.15519944,0.8389417,0.00018595273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87441105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86729604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12558895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033577364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12160953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25265712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004086633","doi":"10.7202/004710ar","title":"Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Victim-Oriented Legal Reform in Europe","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Political science; Duty; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Guideline; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.531214141632105,"score_gpt":0.44635642689767474,"score_spread":0.08485771473443027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004086633","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15685336,0.7814408,0.015257824,0.0052537043,0.0026528293,0.024848206,0.003048863,0.00033942485,0.010305076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8528746,0.09580707,0.029890526,0.0021061942,0.0005926536,0.01631542,0.0015552497,0.0001319306,0.000726452],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.70268506,0.24031524,0.036290493,0.0073797917,0.011447941,0.0018815353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5491195,0.37242252,0.03244045,0.019912101,0.023520557,0.0025848728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2391419,0.0030543706,0.012703933,0.017314255,0.0016010695,0.007819347,0.005096408,0.003575388,0.0063885474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39078164,0.0016707153,0.022251396,0.010651113,0.004027712,0.0064653116,0.005519182,0.0030319,0.00038143373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02384454,0.0009032024,0.010007416,0.34406236,0.52558035,0.00026151957,0.003139883,0.00402253,0.0007813849,0.005371602,0.0014458792,0.08057923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014712937,0.008804868,0.01372851,0.14561512,0.7907619,0.00012995114,0.0019824456,0.0029369674,0.0021177882,0.0051984624,0.013799556,0.00021144148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087036425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011191437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7608581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016916713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012946765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9382735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004471259","doi":"10.7202/043931ar","title":"La liberté d’expression au travail et l’obligation de loyauté du salarié : étude empirique de l’incidence des chartes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01310741831431206,"score_gpt":0.2798715204994822,"score_spread":0.26676410218517016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004471259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6982575,0.010901556,0.008518072,0.018850865,0.0003023068,0.00018842307,0.0016702039,0.000050299725,0.26126072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670236,0.0028286017,0.0010648991,0.00055992784,0.00014850369,0.00013782369,0.00035059493,0.000039949296,0.027846178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98599094,0.0054375506,0.00080156315,0.0015392383,0.004246056,0.001984535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93812984,0.04110357,0.010450882,0.0022893178,0.006908369,0.0011180234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014191285,0.00022728594,0.00047936803,0.005386366,0.003954583,0.0064698225,0.0013148367,0.0011436576,0.012779932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041529525,0.0005322544,0.00040669696,0.007736014,0.008311045,0.0038640553,0.0040717344,0.0028299612,0.0009886764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017474974,0.00008710751,0.12388887,0.0006336134,0.00006182747,0.00034571686,0.12483966,0.0017947748,0.00066938286,0.6607916,0.014305924,0.07240676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004151211,0.00018969513,0.42714867,0.0017833421,0.000059042937,0.0003117815,0.1130918,0.0033821298,0.0021714654,0.03005578,0.42161435,0.00015038441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11590097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123463474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11590097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014460759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008781798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23045272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005113290","doi":"10.1080/14662043.2011.582736","title":"Judicial and political review as limited insurance: the functioning of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act in ‘hard’ cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth and Comparative Politics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Legislation; Political science; Bill of rights; Politics; Cabinet (room); Duty; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.185225982108789,"score_gpt":0.38345302507022894,"score_spread":0.19822704296143995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005113290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106759764,0.0062380065,0.03139596,0.08403914,0.00046353502,0.00042118574,0.00009790242,0.00010676607,0.7704777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745208,0.0013278269,0.005005318,0.006331972,0.00040641212,0.00031062815,0.000024085424,0.000044896464,0.012028102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9121721,0.052171517,0.0026558556,0.005456997,0.019562136,0.007981469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9041923,0.06958492,0.008688386,0.00840196,0.006014459,0.0031179253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05527053,0.00049398816,0.0009921044,0.0049539316,0.006194381,0.027822953,0.0030792742,0.010988596,0.0054625794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11520497,0.0012388704,0.0009657103,0.0032267296,0.061977353,0.017014379,0.008617458,0.008404104,0.00066653173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016609012,0.00001162614,0.0010324206,0.00002770621,0.0000080112295,0.00011276875,0.0023183608,0.00029549823,0.000096801334,0.9879771,0.0012376688,0.006865487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014603877,0.00010368023,0.011270779,0.00072396756,0.00007311071,0.00039535263,0.0039357548,0.0053568985,0.0006152961,0.85954356,0.11767722,0.00015840663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09106706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079735376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09106706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02764724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025369855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.292302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007511583","doi":"10.7202/1027454ar","title":"Le droit de la victime à des dommages punitifs en droit civil québécois : sens et contresens","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Freedom of expression; Philosophy; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.013225375673420796,"score_gpt":0.2721219004016075,"score_spread":0.2588965247281867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007511583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81833684,0.009190564,0.0017719457,0.03768227,0.00045121595,0.0000590626,0.0004316538,0.000022155322,0.13205422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96666014,0.0029129854,0.00036426142,0.0027595651,0.00005712902,0.000022553706,0.000068452646,0.000013036276,0.02714179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973961,0.0008968178,0.00007534816,0.00024432575,0.0006239434,0.00076343404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668115,0.0010517702,0.0005418878,0.00016949652,0.0011826769,0.00037293002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024454123,0.00043473596,0.0004979814,0.0017625247,0.013442414,0.004820789,0.0011701554,0.0026016864,0.0077494695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057203174,0.00027515026,0.0003579239,0.0019545942,0.009654238,0.0017534038,0.0035812706,0.0033919846,0.00044794867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019570351,0.00010716439,0.14944641,0.00056003436,0.00021703719,0.0069390363,0.5485133,0.000633487,0.0016969112,0.17008445,0.030995108,0.090611376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016223508,0.00010478556,0.27789485,0.0016442369,0.00014297788,0.0021828162,0.5188846,0.000399473,0.0010586742,0.00874534,0.18874435,0.00018171627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92234606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077653944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024145287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01720972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17518717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007721336","doi":"10.7202/042195ar","title":"Observations sur le Rapport de l'Office de révision du Code civil sur les sûretés réelles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Lien; Political science; Law; Security interest; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law","score_opus":0.05224272354398239,"score_gpt":0.27432068288192035,"score_spread":0.22207795933793795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007721336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2530051,0.01249899,0.003823706,0.5376552,0.0062808334,0.0005132993,0.0013222052,0.00022661666,0.18467407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72789294,0.004414171,0.0018234845,0.08345129,0.0018150749,0.0003070092,0.00048052607,0.00025670914,0.17955871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96408945,0.009939086,0.0015700187,0.0021710873,0.014704855,0.00752549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724435,0.06916954,0.012120823,0.0037935774,0.036475547,0.0059969705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035519626,0.00038347967,0.00047623232,0.0020108654,0.0145740425,0.009742846,0.002125774,0.0076142172,0.0066986424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0980641,0.00082839123,0.00058700086,0.0032879845,0.006770851,0.0028543116,0.0027383545,0.011190756,0.0010126714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049946737,0.00036114885,0.042659756,0.00043602305,0.000070779504,0.0039941827,0.14325881,0.0009998907,0.0026109628,0.20072576,0.51418704,0.09019616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004627876,0.00009333441,0.060635377,0.00025878302,0.000019388137,0.00020006682,0.017791212,0.00031453112,0.0008709233,0.0016753036,0.91797894,0.00011584878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.840747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84278446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.840747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037139818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3203817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007912515","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106","title":"The Common Enterprise Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Principal (computer security); Common law; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Computer security; Data mining","score_opus":0.10403258259634907,"score_gpt":0.4238262595036901,"score_spread":0.319793676907341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007912515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15551126,0.0024008555,0.102471046,0.028676089,0.0012462664,0.00025127982,0.00013642694,0.00019782934,0.7091089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9332748,0.000702846,0.013673423,0.00639771,0.00045653983,0.00016485542,0.000060478385,0.00005422643,0.045215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9590018,0.008413567,0.0028293193,0.0043436587,0.020760594,0.0046509886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97075844,0.015740097,0.0019990343,0.0036622726,0.0070204968,0.0008196919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015759291,0.00024055775,0.0010200547,0.001860348,0.0059229047,0.0104725985,0.0021475386,0.006349987,0.0034252328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060396902,0.00050226535,0.0011105626,0.0010071386,0.01697345,0.004987501,0.00559382,0.008022981,0.0010194271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013176969,0.000007171823,0.0004121202,0.000022669356,0.0000051337192,0.00020103146,0.0010312378,0.0002562351,0.00018720081,0.99240124,0.0011603374,0.0043023415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006601004,0.00014753314,0.004311094,0.00035380071,0.000057730416,0.0010033172,0.0032202727,0.0025973734,0.0018271442,0.84370035,0.14258093,0.00013445414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023797141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029705947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023797141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041541858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015250261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0833441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008860857","doi":"10.7202/1026749ar","title":"Une tentative de clarification de la présomption de respect des valeurs de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020481257215218613,"score_gpt":0.31216359368287483,"score_spread":0.29168233646765623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008860857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055294197,0.0055083944,0.073646896,0.039709512,0.0019288112,0.0001358182,0.00057836005,0.0001545184,0.8230435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8623088,0.0032577266,0.020322343,0.00425376,0.00049884233,0.00010736917,0.00022729968,0.00012788716,0.108895935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967179,0.00075401587,0.00011817682,0.00061622146,0.0012894936,0.0005041629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965744,0.001053816,0.00025132365,0.00046859184,0.0014396143,0.00021226071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028151537,0.00060018565,0.0005445303,0.0017714369,0.005985815,0.008403547,0.0018550343,0.002608369,0.011409768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007040146,0.00031625596,0.000667889,0.0020274972,0.021388631,0.005180887,0.003319432,0.007428426,0.00088512193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073708147,0.000002747074,0.0003443235,0.000029379098,0.000004592711,0.000068647976,0.0052088066,0.00012048979,0.00016058773,0.98850936,0.0017191808,0.003824541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024375893,0.000048440234,0.006342353,0.00047319406,0.00005496871,0.00039330305,0.01205693,0.0012874161,0.0016763599,0.50924325,0.4682911,0.000108286535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28417128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44680935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7158287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01422165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023706846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56503445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009143937","doi":"10.7202/042770ar","title":"À la recherche d'une protection efficace contre les inspections abusives de l'État : la Charte québécoise, la Charte canadienne et le Bill of Rights américain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Warrant; Human rights; State (computer science); Business","score_opus":0.06026899105093407,"score_gpt":0.3168692097390976,"score_spread":0.2566002186881635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009143937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012075988,0.057995524,0.020384494,0.31894997,0.0057232273,0.00022371381,0.00058177556,0.00019105624,0.58387417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37248015,0.03961042,0.02200919,0.047754098,0.0029328363,0.00037059697,0.0004954049,0.0003748471,0.5139725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824937,0.003886669,0.00037689754,0.0013981485,0.0083864955,0.0034579914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644304,0.004874608,0.00053584675,0.0012522342,0.005717686,0.0011764853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015502119,0.0013697011,0.0009573026,0.0030524328,0.013979661,0.024964396,0.0026826207,0.015548808,0.018787934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02248263,0.00074911764,0.0013170388,0.0038420695,0.024998624,0.011644814,0.0033056901,0.013256225,0.002367832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013179116,0.000017667422,0.00039446112,0.000051876406,0.000005674996,0.000114169416,0.0013259234,0.00036325137,0.00012822072,0.9376484,0.04485888,0.015078286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027862377,0.000020741076,0.0022753181,0.0005447749,0.000011499184,0.0001805395,0.0018668028,0.0007662878,0.00026490382,0.08490971,0.9090678,0.00006377148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9006255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87155557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09937447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063382775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12570609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45987636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009338544","doi":"10.7202/043068ar","title":"Les règles procédurales entourant la recevabilité des déclarations extrajudiciaires","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03750774742597392,"score_gpt":0.3149122592187984,"score_spread":0.2774045117928245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009338544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18869391,0.006236304,0.15184285,0.029178571,0.0024025673,0.0014352713,0.0013605292,0.0011604973,0.61768955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6251909,0.0025966575,0.057863206,0.0059292894,0.0011341788,0.0012268322,0.00063380756,0.00038902013,0.3050361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96906954,0.010797392,0.0030529492,0.0032035424,0.0107368035,0.0031397503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93432605,0.035063013,0.008008253,0.010011291,0.011287806,0.0013036344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021915352,0.0005595477,0.00053790177,0.002164192,0.0052271155,0.007907726,0.0022741572,0.004381673,0.0084136855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06364198,0.00063678325,0.0015104157,0.0015721021,0.006013253,0.0042092674,0.0039108037,0.007355408,0.0035975263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019418006,0.00018165351,0.00936005,0.0006035564,0.00011953837,0.00091587374,0.024635619,0.002056945,0.008443422,0.7976982,0.02295132,0.13283966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006494163,0.000711912,0.051568095,0.0011274858,0.0002642376,0.001638234,0.0127576,0.0017558815,0.026671996,0.13550381,0.7675266,0.0004092081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011071252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018264398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021915352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032693895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110069765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115900815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009451228","doi":"10.4000/champpenal.612","title":"Canadian Prisoners’ Right to a Fair and Impartial Disciplinary Proceedings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Champ pénal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Law; Charter; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Human rights; Minor (academic); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01862969392237048,"score_gpt":0.29822341926336776,"score_spread":0.2795937253409973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009451228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106600106,0.029144162,0.0021615564,0.18807095,0.0012150022,0.00017029243,0.0019432174,0.00013378088,0.670561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88688725,0.011643911,0.0020220762,0.011525191,0.00023473435,0.000055395532,0.00035545888,0.000050303322,0.08722571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910539,0.0008737652,0.00036624185,0.00058683415,0.004963534,0.0021558066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803366,0.0029445146,0.0008018356,0.0006647305,0.013516547,0.0017357715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055044405,0.0002489105,0.00035728098,0.0032522394,0.0189672,0.006365452,0.001796545,0.0028474608,0.012035061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026918937,0.00044767675,0.00039862687,0.0031753876,0.006809566,0.0015986656,0.001988856,0.003500573,0.0005668535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008358557,0.000035228266,0.011197404,0.0005337412,0.000050141898,0.00074516487,0.019227585,0.00068118394,0.0005849165,0.4971357,0.3462721,0.12345328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045599725,0.000032609885,0.07305521,0.0008868945,0.000099192584,0.0003893936,0.009450492,0.0005563189,0.00077176484,0.019094808,0.89539325,0.0002244936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99403644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08040082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08040082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17435455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5833515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009796871","doi":"10.7202/1027048ar","title":"L’arrêt Beaudry : la discrétion policière et la discrétion judiciaire balisées","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01637389420142863,"score_gpt":0.29977658088890274,"score_spread":0.2834026866874741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009796871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23568968,0.008277334,0.008127624,0.047431406,0.000613684,0.00011151699,0.00044000102,0.00009422716,0.69921464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87102205,0.0021250863,0.0012262105,0.00277011,0.00012768441,0.000034737175,0.00008921216,0.000085599815,0.1225193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919212,0.0011355253,0.00011466238,0.00060978474,0.0033990731,0.0028197533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945773,0.0012739428,0.00065603916,0.0002636429,0.0018376696,0.0013913597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024527772,0.00048416326,0.0005908993,0.0019988718,0.01580014,0.014218689,0.0014336591,0.002786588,0.012870313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007818137,0.00034263133,0.0005063892,0.003136605,0.018493874,0.0028494897,0.0043541095,0.004865258,0.0008040587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009110498,0.000031685107,0.0146979205,0.00009719184,0.0000324667,0.00057703943,0.058797337,0.0009038785,0.0003973841,0.8873167,0.014844502,0.02221269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005871542,0.00006155999,0.09987988,0.0009152887,0.000072222094,0.00031188712,0.09219025,0.002338721,0.0009633599,0.097743474,0.7052359,0.00022883005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9499063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9669408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08118021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09099107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5890064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010562289","doi":"10.7202/042441ar","title":"Quelques mots sur la recevabilité des éléments de preuve extrinsèques devant les tribunaux : le Canada et les États-Unis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Statute; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02155887224701705,"score_gpt":0.2879716732807354,"score_spread":0.2664128010337184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010562289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12718683,0.08487496,0.010033368,0.27871788,0.0023503676,0.000059641206,0.00059493654,0.00012460657,0.49605742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8135581,0.02343419,0.004420592,0.016321408,0.0010124332,0.000051480638,0.0001868707,0.00013231797,0.14088255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99277824,0.0012504522,0.00016810851,0.0005570119,0.00334557,0.0019006283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360824,0.0024536373,0.0004441887,0.00030882348,0.0026200176,0.00056513556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042856615,0.0005673876,0.0006740241,0.0026370927,0.013619683,0.013104937,0.0014215438,0.004660902,0.010441169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013597305,0.00043371727,0.00073945033,0.0031003319,0.020042425,0.0066847126,0.0026712907,0.008458555,0.00077895616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050190916,0.000012841236,0.0030759464,0.00008504452,0.000026451402,0.00023144369,0.011170532,0.0002777761,0.00028294374,0.94540673,0.01351184,0.025868118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004314126,0.000035004858,0.021334453,0.001067404,0.00006550405,0.00048235053,0.022948787,0.00066626637,0.0021489712,0.11768952,0.83337504,0.00014360917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9154338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94835514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084566176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044582646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047708813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3234713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011695981","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2007.19537","title":"Le droit de vote des détenus en droits canadien, sud-africain et conventionnel européen","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Democracy; Citizenship; Law; Warrant; Supreme court; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.033871886469537524,"score_gpt":0.31815675723698444,"score_spread":0.2842848707674469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011695981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53373367,0.0358728,0.0031725778,0.019423276,0.0014640905,0.00009104675,0.0037554244,0.00005441427,0.40243277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94237566,0.010367846,0.0008654349,0.0019564712,0.0002672602,0.00006738438,0.0006905348,0.000029393595,0.043379907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935276,0.0031241477,0.00028214863,0.0005093352,0.0016212225,0.0009355699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732996,0.008532148,0.0018850942,0.00046158305,0.0014260391,0.00036525892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044681486,0.00037487835,0.0005016424,0.0041188486,0.0046782726,0.0046322565,0.000737032,0.0015392159,0.009592412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027631603,0.0002594062,0.00024933615,0.005051153,0.0029699833,0.0027054534,0.0024160452,0.003415414,0.0009726885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066376495,0.00019454923,0.14447428,0.0012221208,0.00018374126,0.0019501724,0.061848503,0.00059400115,0.0008521749,0.5173067,0.048744768,0.22196528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004732978,0.00018220521,0.22669497,0.0022113342,0.000101008525,0.0014475615,0.05193624,0.0004380975,0.002587159,0.024299273,0.68993413,0.00012067034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0797633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11803421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039541842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029583445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15859807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015954017","doi":"10.7202/043326ar","title":"L'indemnisation des victimes de harcèlement sexuel au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02278429265146582,"score_gpt":0.29113102603519925,"score_spread":0.26834673338373344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015954017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92685175,0.004259325,0.0007126673,0.007931064,0.00015215875,0.00010067002,0.0005552842,0.000016793094,0.059420247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482582,0.0038039796,0.00034030367,0.0015127694,0.00002589596,0.000047834073,0.00017607355,0.000010583946,0.04582434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987941,0.0002226761,0.000034540444,0.00011085772,0.0003588541,0.00047896864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965713,0.00065222644,0.00040829944,0.00011643832,0.0018309621,0.00042077684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011701199,0.00024314498,0.0003340231,0.0023351314,0.011089623,0.0023952639,0.0010574723,0.0009895661,0.00782525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004877137,0.00020965129,0.0002213638,0.0029731393,0.002799179,0.000766849,0.0014664549,0.0015122894,0.00030214898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022044132,0.00020135407,0.5094016,0.00060572795,0.00012938085,0.0026468944,0.23592201,0.0005670039,0.0016858882,0.02950474,0.038448237,0.1806667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014134519,0.00013295011,0.69927233,0.0005625496,0.00011460011,0.00052596786,0.1837361,0.0005598119,0.001161353,0.00096135493,0.11287482,0.00008405635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033428106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033428106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02982555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24253899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018015607","doi":"10.7202/017295ar","title":"La déclaration de la victime au tribunal : évaluation de l’expérience du Palais de Justice de Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.17654845129408442,"score_gpt":0.4074500925927109,"score_spread":0.2309016412986265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018015607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984391,0.0003027953,0.0004010877,0.001962192,0.000059298316,0.00028866375,0.00007879799,0.000016713564,0.01249944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903804,0.00024999943,0.0003608671,0.00037073562,0.000029586286,0.0001229702,0.000056816803,0.000009366413,0.00841911],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98517793,0.009004164,0.00022170306,0.00082688214,0.0027372432,0.002032002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854011,0.006786996,0.0017010904,0.0006967938,0.003221684,0.0021923676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01016331,0.00095338136,0.0005555281,0.001841352,0.015782531,0.004154825,0.0026576007,0.0028246336,0.0068031773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036329493,0.0006877673,0.00039391697,0.001975697,0.0115516195,0.0017274193,0.0052074706,0.0030640604,0.00031913302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000706194,0.002591593,0.05504606,0.0002883971,0.00009643267,0.0037986857,0.85588104,0.0008690553,0.005243476,0.008732279,0.009805791,0.056940984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025675585,0.002207923,0.17318437,0.00018075205,0.00006913993,0.0006698404,0.73177695,0.0010064738,0.0029831987,0.001194144,0.08621204,0.00025844664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7547886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9009064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24521142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024073014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015811592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.493311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018579699","doi":"10.7202/043087ar","title":"L'équité procédurale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Obligation; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01889436163173303,"score_gpt":0.28219360520212783,"score_spread":0.2632992435703948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018579699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053786994,0.0056141936,0.09811135,0.025560064,0.0005234479,0.00013320307,0.00020977778,0.00011312497,0.8643562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6122312,0.009215982,0.050680313,0.021552594,0.001856211,0.0013697877,0.00035090363,0.00044204152,0.30230102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756384,0.00969672,0.0011909556,0.004095818,0.007512216,0.0018658049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894796,0.0055967923,0.00074889284,0.0020176861,0.0019224092,0.00023462524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013985493,0.00081406866,0.0010471855,0.0018475957,0.005902708,0.012376333,0.0027553441,0.0058887624,0.016058724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022868946,0.00066940085,0.0016701443,0.0025373972,0.023707906,0.012731647,0.006624377,0.011355208,0.0028253065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001643083,0.000002058872,0.000017510314,0.000010889721,0.0000020990315,0.00000663352,0.00029705526,0.000055023847,0.000018283257,0.9971576,0.00078700593,0.0016442989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014615518,0.000024574247,0.0002450833,0.00021565767,0.000017399447,0.00012293487,0.000495968,0.0005132937,0.0003812584,0.70762676,0.29031956,0.000023020755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017592568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01205734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017592568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01044416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013115598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07577807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019831013","doi":"10.7202/042697ar","title":"L'effectivité des décisions de la justice pénale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.017493310890399606,"score_gpt":0.3203086638213609,"score_spread":0.3028153529309613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019831013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4709348,0.007663476,0.016406488,0.011938698,0.0006676305,0.00039446703,0.00045734984,0.00021031301,0.49132672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718232,0.0024119245,0.00499883,0.0011598218,0.000440013,0.00012431155,0.0001075431,0.00004426657,0.01889011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9104018,0.056080412,0.0026750283,0.00318627,0.024435824,0.0032206837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82898307,0.14090513,0.012056307,0.0061386586,0.009605436,0.002311409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0276712,0.0012444154,0.0006123917,0.0036181356,0.0020584145,0.009751047,0.001119543,0.0029280349,0.011922378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10345685,0.00041010525,0.0012103382,0.001671869,0.0058527873,0.0028164817,0.0020695135,0.004337964,0.0015382678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021627322,0.0021800864,0.11073514,0.0012670007,0.001710446,0.0016433009,0.008283509,0.023596335,0.013114848,0.43340436,0.01088001,0.39102224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010846608,0.006589343,0.41915268,0.0023617707,0.0012289346,0.003641548,0.007637949,0.035802286,0.03125638,0.15471496,0.3360044,0.0005251556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014715901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013434417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0276712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005105599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027579868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14634109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020234690","doi":"10.7202/043292ar","title":"L'interprétation du Code civil du Québec : l'occasion d'une réforme de la responsabilité extracontractuelle de l'Administration publique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00851803363404038,"score_gpt":0.2746368465794925,"score_spread":0.26611881294545214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020234690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093695894,0.018389294,0.009618585,0.21303886,0.002916103,0.00008400475,0.00073778146,0.00013941653,0.66138005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8162551,0.003983777,0.0023921214,0.012992709,0.00039764002,0.000066908775,0.00017111664,0.00009449247,0.1636461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610907,0.001235546,0.000051711268,0.00036794486,0.0012656497,0.00097004045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962865,0.00069715787,0.00021029681,0.00018350739,0.0021617643,0.00046073258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002285658,0.0006485568,0.00031557315,0.0015608334,0.014592779,0.008564515,0.0012699818,0.0034916238,0.007922815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051255915,0.0002119403,0.0002827001,0.0024398942,0.018286873,0.002103571,0.0016474937,0.004344114,0.0005246831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041315165,0.000017100318,0.0025137963,0.00008993837,0.000009953223,0.0003068162,0.0331841,0.0005098828,0.0005055862,0.8628997,0.07304847,0.026873326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016119013,0.000025177984,0.012258338,0.00038633813,0.000021902964,0.00012870693,0.022956705,0.0011089937,0.00046145252,0.04023014,0.92234117,0.00006504548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9787281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1163726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083820894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8443463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021585713","doi":"10.7202/1002076ar","title":"Du droit libéral au droit bureaucratique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche sociologique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.24214324089171613,"score_gpt":0.38789094293242476,"score_spread":0.14574770204070864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021585713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45448402,0.0023951705,0.005500834,0.0091125695,0.00015470061,0.000071442344,0.0005447425,0.00009228227,0.52764416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94224,0.0008164541,0.00064635486,0.0003335068,0.000052985724,0.000020914045,0.0001274138,0.000036868285,0.055725493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683595,0.0005336331,0.00007640541,0.0005057806,0.0011279982,0.00092026783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959037,0.0013331536,0.0009961006,0.00035612335,0.0008131619,0.0005979323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013909063,0.000283885,0.00028268367,0.003823917,0.0045821304,0.007467274,0.00064669,0.0011131745,0.021801393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006669077,0.00028680323,0.0003972144,0.003913468,0.007144149,0.002099831,0.0022534537,0.0022342752,0.0012203081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009668501,0.000055419743,0.043656517,0.00009272072,0.000025234205,0.00040224264,0.024144366,0.0016070169,0.0005811926,0.87895644,0.005334804,0.045047317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049473503,0.00011529172,0.40440965,0.0005445445,0.000056288343,0.00053011486,0.029879056,0.0044729533,0.0012671899,0.076141186,0.48244205,0.00009215538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36345217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3880235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36345217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016611721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009521739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7226733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20216342","doi":"10.1097/brs.0b013e3181bef192","title":"Jean-Claude Hébert. \"Droit pénal des affaires\".","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01972128699490294,"score_gpt":0.276723927990349,"score_spread":0.25700264099544606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20216342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004962545,0.23488873,0.0021598465,0.21054162,0.065089196,0.00020633324,0.005271882,0.0013401262,0.47553965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028090825,0.045559566,0.0016865077,0.040237013,0.008154123,0.00031431476,0.0013068464,0.00039628777,0.87425447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991295,0.00019156342,0.000070163565,0.000111068315,0.00037051525,0.00012718122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999014,0.00043152538,0.00014024207,0.000047285124,0.00025221077,0.00011459934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088215945,0.00106863,0.0005338172,0.0013920538,0.0018552665,0.0013572494,0.00091175415,0.0051679593,0.1059716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003944603,0.00039375926,0.00042689362,0.0011270231,0.0007714634,0.0011906696,0.0011875655,0.003057629,0.029800225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002649979,0.000017150292,0.00029607755,0.00014518382,0.000005036165,0.00017157696,0.00013398669,0.00006030781,0.000084563995,0.009643444,0.92794305,0.061473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007297913,0.000009773132,0.002592678,0.00025471213,0.0000028274867,0.00029393277,0.00012751327,0.000076496544,0.00010948578,0.000809814,0.9957033,0.000012118063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054796137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07951459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1059716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014695716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001286358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3545103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022122013","doi":"10.7202/042668ar","title":"The Possible Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Administrative Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.020192626669116597,"score_gpt":0.2996139951185351,"score_spread":0.2794213684494185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022122013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050325565,0.004622974,0.0034662301,0.0970399,0.0012112804,0.00008942274,0.0003475162,0.00007801539,0.8428192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592238,0.0036108368,0.0027213197,0.0125692105,0.0005345851,0.00006454266,0.00011409293,0.000074813994,0.12108682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554754,0.0028104307,0.00019379937,0.0009669175,0.0055142264,0.004967077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98942965,0.0039140102,0.0006315188,0.00074978406,0.0039306358,0.0013444683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072740833,0.0006017668,0.0004516519,0.0029305178,0.019026939,0.012669064,0.0018786972,0.0046077697,0.01027136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018147124,0.000459517,0.00075351004,0.0034313546,0.022946533,0.004362167,0.00402493,0.0053982656,0.00060122076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018471399,0.000006886583,0.00084511435,0.000022599235,0.0000032852245,0.00009488049,0.0025858278,0.00025507418,0.00007108498,0.98038083,0.01007494,0.0056409477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009724564,0.000083915285,0.03064778,0.00047878717,0.00009903548,0.00022204833,0.01583416,0.0025752876,0.0008102424,0.21984513,0.7290396,0.00026678346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98521775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108477615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.108477615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1541926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78706384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022732784","doi":"10.7202/042907ar","title":"Réforme des tribunaux administratifs et contrôle judiciaire: les inconsistances et les hésitations du Rapport Ouellette","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.03185750708640252,"score_gpt":0.3136875890923067,"score_spread":0.2818300820059042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022732784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07331932,0.06670995,0.03711893,0.5276304,0.004530267,0.00014815733,0.00021373165,0.00028791252,0.29004133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83165824,0.0097617945,0.008693313,0.034152307,0.0027672292,0.00015533861,0.000072989904,0.00010148471,0.11263727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984665,0.0053332993,0.00055846,0.0022287641,0.0050518042,0.0021626512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878143,0.0058341986,0.00074970943,0.0017554567,0.0031101156,0.0007361746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01786579,0.000412769,0.0006759582,0.00149529,0.00655426,0.014121599,0.002817627,0.007645743,0.004380423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020890027,0.00055400946,0.00064978085,0.0014336107,0.015421186,0.007538949,0.0028014956,0.009643707,0.0009420059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013989206,0.000021516424,0.00035507942,0.00003808892,0.000008245945,0.00007998302,0.0017438007,0.0006649231,0.00017694228,0.9716735,0.011819575,0.013404182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010221464,0.00011424758,0.004476046,0.00038352452,0.000038835027,0.00016017868,0.0020724065,0.0050217235,0.0011630891,0.31298527,0.673401,0.00008153576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2748563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23166305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7251437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029507216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02889058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5465129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023878368","doi":"10.7202/1006413ar","title":"L’interprétation de la portée de la Loi sur l’assurance automobile : un éternel recommencement","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018567389516692227,"score_gpt":0.28187176628351335,"score_spread":0.2633043767668211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023878368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039678633,0.0128139695,0.02221469,0.24988022,0.002381879,0.00009488064,0.00020958844,0.00016457128,0.67256147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77024287,0.004598898,0.0045526917,0.03851517,0.0012837378,0.0001382559,0.000069360496,0.00011687925,0.18048216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912736,0.0029649935,0.0003152382,0.0010573225,0.0028913969,0.0014974785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426633,0.0023860876,0.00041616164,0.00055084476,0.0020376684,0.00034297112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051328866,0.0006758352,0.0004568001,0.0013288441,0.009671929,0.010463846,0.002296386,0.01286316,0.0064509194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008245423,0.0004062225,0.00078256323,0.00083585375,0.028134402,0.004330996,0.004134343,0.011494802,0.001495243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018289864,0.000012706263,0.0006694281,0.00007698345,0.0000069658045,0.0002889429,0.011002444,0.00017390547,0.0004691019,0.9631105,0.015001185,0.009169464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027842443,0.00008496299,0.0049658604,0.0007030421,0.000039432405,0.0004596907,0.011599466,0.00074519415,0.001747546,0.19607033,0.78344023,0.000116393836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19297004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18156077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80702996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013352421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015126458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38369364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024229701","doi":"10.7202/042890ar","title":"Approaches to the Reform of the Law of Theft","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06401139725772492,"score_gpt":0.2637545460460102,"score_spread":0.19974314878828525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024229701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016413676,0.008543134,0.013943144,0.065647975,0.0006696897,0.00010262021,0.00008097599,0.000059952785,0.89453876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7990521,0.005839659,0.005993407,0.012321481,0.0006844134,0.00026438377,0.00006735182,0.000058182683,0.17571896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011654,0.0037418539,0.00021023225,0.00082033913,0.0027362728,0.002374741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975949,0.00092713983,0.00022872571,0.00029314982,0.0007078112,0.00024831586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005608074,0.00056291587,0.00060526235,0.0032040821,0.013101194,0.012041264,0.0028586756,0.0075301374,0.0061521227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007101988,0.0004382494,0.000744302,0.0027953826,0.050126743,0.0042139487,0.004942242,0.00796546,0.000531535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014625316,0.0000024690828,0.000021307604,0.0000050890562,6.202147e-7,0.000007752738,0.0007894197,0.00012374607,0.0000075328744,0.9976628,0.0006914098,0.0006864169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025682786,0.000017783874,0.0005251907,0.00024495902,0.000011062726,0.00004552967,0.003939109,0.0010731132,0.00018442223,0.6802709,0.31363893,0.000023426963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5346649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5542718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08688128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071573675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.936151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024507859","doi":"10.1353/utq.2005.0033","title":"Renegade Lawyer: The Life of J.L. Cohen (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Institution; Law; Opposition (politics); Face (sociological concept); Mentally ill; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.019087234132300398,"score_gpt":0.25910923426730553,"score_spread":0.24002200013500513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024507859","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044694276,0.96636194,0.000033533037,0.024366058,0.0067954315,0.000011238053,0.00003072927,0.000010714735,0.0023456875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013674136,0.9522296,0.00010728597,0.028660033,0.006956933,0.000054771495,0.00011221963,0.000013146789,0.010498466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986299,0.00032694227,0.0001302537,0.00018956103,0.00057931594,0.00014408478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545825,0.001305359,0.0007781453,0.00009248246,0.0014956049,0.00087030866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019457177,0.0011568333,0.001960021,0.0018211468,0.000859237,0.0042229365,0.0017922872,0.004322276,0.03001936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009088622,0.0005020052,0.0006346058,0.0032768068,0.0012768862,0.0042724903,0.001430487,0.0056669274,0.012393283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003217282,0.000015058878,0.00015714069,0.0047237976,0.000032798645,0.00007144846,0.00006609825,0.000028009095,0.000039577848,0.0007145116,0.874594,0.119525425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030941144,0.000020673866,0.0007002786,0.011019204,0.000035291003,0.0004121624,0.00015433217,0.0000157575,0.000020353678,0.00050115574,0.9870744,0.00001542741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007925844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010905963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03001936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002946747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006838296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100424826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024603388","doi":"10.5539/res.v7n6p255","title":"The Current Situation Concerning Investigative and Operational Search Powers of a Crime Investigator in Criminal Proceedings in the Former Soviet Union","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Legislation; Political science; The Republic; Criminal code; Criminal investigation; Law; Context (archaeology); Conformity; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Soviet union; Criminal law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.2690170575682638,"score_gpt":0.4320444129616591,"score_spread":0.1630273553933953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024603388","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2154933,0.6968352,0.0016304699,0.024663424,0.00050288724,0.000036565958,0.00017425306,0.000026528654,0.06063752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7962696,0.19851533,0.0007477367,0.0025666317,0.0003195931,0.000023240173,0.00010508352,0.000006435997,0.0014463246],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847949,0.0073975744,0.0021810143,0.0013552917,0.0031260455,0.001145201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802698,0.011021605,0.004906336,0.0005664548,0.002771826,0.000463893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013006221,0.00015533685,0.00036849073,0.0050897105,0.0028160773,0.0087239025,0.001169947,0.0020285829,0.0016619018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02019987,0.00032637818,0.000285198,0.006234632,0.007030429,0.0050547174,0.0020753073,0.0011499166,0.00025608455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029726315,0.00013945682,0.07765902,0.0094321715,0.00014454644,0.0017171128,0.042031407,0.0007175252,0.0011110725,0.32210135,0.011674929,0.53297424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000441053,0.00037226436,0.3140562,0.024955576,0.00042314024,0.0044217096,0.13273133,0.0003633573,0.0021445476,0.044160843,0.47615093,0.00017602477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01647747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022199465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055620205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012480857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0687843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024845134","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.1.139","title":"Canada: Production of private records of victims of sexual assault in R. v. Shearing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.027850139708130797,"score_gpt":0.31555948460722366,"score_spread":0.2877093448990929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024845134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23421508,0.014403505,0.0042233733,0.12542686,0.001920452,0.0033277222,0.10441527,0.00095030473,0.51111746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5270656,0.014710536,0.0112407515,0.013248022,0.00036756537,0.00072213163,0.020090967,0.00025046428,0.4123039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463516,0.0003144329,0.00029139227,0.0002615765,0.0035199756,0.0009773305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98421186,0.0025513042,0.0009515161,0.0014157646,0.00928583,0.001583674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041849837,0.0004056606,0.00034211678,0.005755663,0.009409211,0.0032953906,0.002648773,0.0018049412,0.009643484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02000899,0.00082714506,0.0002521437,0.0071962164,0.0019402853,0.0009382635,0.002159884,0.0016448888,0.0012943908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018673258,0.000088843444,0.027488114,0.0006664009,0.000044129338,0.002382662,0.021567954,0.00088837213,0.0030814502,0.05104157,0.75507975,0.13748406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100860154,0.000065928616,0.15499295,0.00065522233,0.00012844257,0.0006963593,0.008519626,0.00095739774,0.004419281,0.0024998947,0.8267868,0.00017725986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99728847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0520117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0520117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20923431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37737304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026674214","doi":"10.7202/043359ar","title":"Le programme de clercs à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011625910762272988,"score_gpt":0.24022762242116194,"score_spread":0.22860171165888896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026674214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5051397,0.0033929402,0.004473723,0.030801684,0.00043587407,0.00030138923,0.00059482176,0.0001899787,0.45466986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86727434,0.0014613384,0.0012116458,0.0020187346,0.000057162662,0.000059798876,0.0001585015,0.00003555832,0.12772286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960413,0.00045362068,0.000055855046,0.00025714157,0.0013606071,0.0018315135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935231,0.00065517885,0.00034177132,0.00020448815,0.0023288196,0.0029465915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002024231,0.0002616392,0.00020297088,0.0014090012,0.013443937,0.0045815627,0.0012195122,0.0012147409,0.014219565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059269015,0.00023649543,0.00019349635,0.002031334,0.004031591,0.0011249953,0.0022762106,0.0019576112,0.0009020258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020569058,0.00023382758,0.083022706,0.00041068756,0.000038644503,0.0006691999,0.079493776,0.0016600074,0.0034212032,0.3845206,0.09625821,0.35006547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028694503,0.00016823238,0.2170707,0.0005253811,0.000035636585,0.00015024941,0.059969015,0.0008068137,0.0011125782,0.0055336384,0.7145126,0.00008639585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95403856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05669978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05669978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13691944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41138762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027089951","doi":"10.7202/1027079ar","title":"Arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada en droit criminel, cuvée 2007 : les grandes tendances","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013029561241444665,"score_gpt":0.2579658671095471,"score_spread":0.24493630586810244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027089951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44191176,0.011208028,0.0024941822,0.064259216,0.0011196116,0.00011203784,0.0018165353,0.000120143144,0.4769585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8261167,0.0033484963,0.000676283,0.0060060546,0.00011697313,0.000031948468,0.00028484227,0.000065734486,0.16335292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995336,0.00026489588,0.00006342228,0.00039419584,0.0023022005,0.0016392504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972767,0.00043499967,0.00019173152,0.00006876042,0.0014841793,0.000543662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016171447,0.00041158297,0.0003696277,0.0017775402,0.022121483,0.010206371,0.0011338195,0.002536456,0.007984353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004851329,0.00034435352,0.00035843288,0.0030687703,0.0063076722,0.0014163575,0.0028449977,0.0051165516,0.00045058524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012998804,0.000040937168,0.03763793,0.00018585386,0.00009674716,0.0016862105,0.094488904,0.0011619008,0.0011055802,0.63744503,0.16173024,0.06429063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015915488,0.000030948955,0.0673334,0.00030920125,0.00006668261,0.00023218428,0.057482716,0.0006311387,0.0013202936,0.0084248185,0.8639814,0.00017119118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10509964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10509964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115367115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027483662","doi":"10.7202/1021109ar","title":"La Charte Canadienne des droits et libertés à la lumière de la « révolution scientifique » et de la « révolution constitutionnelle » : l’exemple du droit constitutionnel du travail","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01132593808674906,"score_gpt":0.26520903106368693,"score_spread":0.2538830929769379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027483662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026303172,0.004188196,0.005774135,0.037620563,0.0009871505,0.00011747412,0.00035798928,0.00009944573,0.9245518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5572963,0.0032948593,0.0041130492,0.005667832,0.000192383,0.00016027897,0.00029082465,0.000087950844,0.4288965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614006,0.0007313568,0.00006966232,0.00042366658,0.0014928262,0.0011424389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812275,0.00040722484,0.00014029066,0.00017314038,0.00077451556,0.00038206816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019934364,0.00041553436,0.00032912666,0.0012390604,0.010181271,0.010365584,0.0008821818,0.0028075888,0.010661852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003994797,0.00024078517,0.00039472894,0.0023296736,0.012976999,0.00256886,0.0028511307,0.0056955176,0.0010124505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010133393,0.000006363293,0.00033892057,0.000021347125,0.0000023970917,0.000057666817,0.0039211004,0.00017780274,0.000101400874,0.97612303,0.012622594,0.0066171126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020449153,0.000018030934,0.005829062,0.0001497436,0.000008644269,0.00006950209,0.004510473,0.00031982,0.0003244793,0.067047395,0.92165554,0.00004696284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8082164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86089605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04973664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07441019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3858261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027877110","doi":"10.7202/042939ar","title":"Le droit et le fait dans l'application des standards et la clause limitative de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012633378250403194,"score_gpt":0.3003383003862277,"score_spread":0.28770492213582455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027877110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051215407,0.010033634,0.10264494,0.0795357,0.0019186451,0.00025585215,0.000430428,0.0001580891,0.7538073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82452506,0.0033285874,0.031192482,0.01296874,0.00077177305,0.00067250436,0.00022906395,0.00017081766,0.12614097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98294973,0.006800581,0.0009691996,0.0024275496,0.0054194815,0.0014334939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98704964,0.007734669,0.00089052704,0.0014951915,0.0024368267,0.00039320625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012758329,0.00061048206,0.00079357025,0.002171002,0.005796893,0.012449911,0.0025687169,0.008192224,0.007805897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020265376,0.0005599964,0.001172689,0.002011569,0.03301658,0.009613106,0.0054224697,0.012568333,0.0011971422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003867239,0.0000022140057,0.000061506995,0.000012143436,0.0000014520123,0.000017150078,0.0014881282,0.000050123337,0.000051891384,0.99647397,0.0006739551,0.0011636302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021253487,0.000038757058,0.00092878134,0.00033513558,0.000019295057,0.000116803705,0.0027975885,0.000526522,0.00079555006,0.7993829,0.19496664,0.000070643844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043712493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03507938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011444219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012004596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08691615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028056940","doi":"10.7202/004758ar","title":"Transformations récentes de la législation fédérale sur la mise en liberté sous condition au Canada. Une lecture à la lumière des écrits sur la notion de risque","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0825559660627647,"score_gpt":0.31527762422932476,"score_spread":0.23272165816656004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028056940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36035368,0.042043407,0.004809146,0.12958433,0.0015402723,0.00027952783,0.0029716452,0.00017391422,0.4582441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88565576,0.012748826,0.0025114308,0.008550403,0.00020188143,0.00008279288,0.00047251297,0.00005356727,0.089722894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929437,0.00058947474,0.00025280437,0.00061993604,0.0035622332,0.0020317056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220484,0.002117538,0.0008853153,0.00027894182,0.0038631884,0.00065011973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036289059,0.00033408267,0.0003066103,0.0031937927,0.010266591,0.0058874977,0.0011781614,0.0019028698,0.005324619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109445425,0.0003959251,0.00034880507,0.0037468155,0.010181689,0.0013596055,0.001996104,0.0036017047,0.00026048752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012214144,0.00007239077,0.03256895,0.0005878168,0.00006353497,0.00090538926,0.0995078,0.0012874891,0.004439176,0.68699205,0.04960275,0.12385049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015304347,0.000052643754,0.13298306,0.00066076836,0.000065279826,0.00018090829,0.023616042,0.00040218525,0.0024634544,0.009359839,0.83006084,0.00013974031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9821401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89744204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10255797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14051741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7441137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028321787","doi":"10.7202/043740ar","title":"La multiplicité des rôles du ministre de l’Environnement s’oppose-t-elle à l’exigence de l’impartialité ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0205978200748131,"score_gpt":0.28025544112119455,"score_spread":0.25965762104638146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028321787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21224327,0.0036980212,0.007681388,0.08810669,0.000510061,0.00006831423,0.00022085862,0.000067935856,0.68740344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93593246,0.00096095126,0.0013830019,0.0030074036,0.00010922764,0.00002670512,0.00004522986,0.00004432653,0.058490794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517584,0.0012302881,0.0001241366,0.00074528286,0.00090564735,0.001818768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99382174,0.0012788551,0.00060569705,0.0008473294,0.0020993354,0.0013469167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004338135,0.00042618677,0.00072974566,0.0018972071,0.012280781,0.015649825,0.0020801083,0.0036324523,0.023371886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009137631,0.00062835356,0.00046989138,0.0014498754,0.019746592,0.008729141,0.0058977413,0.0042821146,0.0015150367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007948681,0.000038423197,0.0138481585,0.000114125614,0.000055698834,0.00047201075,0.022547055,0.00037202227,0.00073520397,0.92120105,0.010287441,0.0302493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006297603,0.000121553276,0.087097734,0.0012383168,0.00014519955,0.0005578614,0.10590519,0.0015619656,0.0015594487,0.1847171,0.6168575,0.00017510501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57858074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78758174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57858074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027218524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029561607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84780216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029366972","doi":"10.7202/042669ar","title":"Vers une judiciarisation du Conseil des ministres?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Duty; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01813469499984094,"score_gpt":0.2797943943182887,"score_spread":0.26165969931844774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029366972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03712915,0.031023273,0.0118678305,0.27526143,0.0042232075,0.00011032029,0.00026182158,0.00023597496,0.63988703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7119234,0.006423713,0.0050305533,0.04696956,0.0015490489,0.00008086875,0.00011136825,0.00015338436,0.22775815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843779,0.003962248,0.00045567373,0.0018170569,0.005766673,0.0036204534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282277,0.0024983527,0.0005259304,0.0007174169,0.002622592,0.00081287895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009624117,0.0005869757,0.0008274501,0.0018821097,0.015637806,0.019075448,0.0025771938,0.008894066,0.009353544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0242918,0.0006198673,0.0005907974,0.0020633442,0.022453213,0.007614537,0.0036107153,0.011529568,0.0020411198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002424064,0.000009359996,0.00059050036,0.00003942137,0.000011112047,0.00015515614,0.0045275325,0.00009018429,0.00016930274,0.9564585,0.023663927,0.014260651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003729944,0.00003439582,0.003961018,0.00045831868,0.000023849954,0.00029883848,0.0053808987,0.0005691053,0.00081887253,0.12639749,0.86194134,0.00007848617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66821074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6872115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66821074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038534775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04562353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6674864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202945015","doi":"","title":"Negligent investigation by police : can a duty of care be found using the existing negligence principles in Australia?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Duty of care; Law; Tort; Officer; Supreme court; Suspect; High Court; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.12935925179575092,"score_gpt":0.32430045712901234,"score_spread":0.19494120533326142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202945015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51651514,0.017790897,0.008711443,0.3325114,0.00093716517,0.00020864965,0.000044499382,0.000031645162,0.123249196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96238095,0.004661118,0.0034897781,0.022177842,0.00028743496,0.00006915565,0.000016027767,0.0000075650414,0.0069102054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801286,0.0067403084,0.0014962052,0.0012420915,0.0071516978,0.003241033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681093,0.017093651,0.0045937337,0.0021468548,0.0050403583,0.0030162518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01795187,0.00024777185,0.00070530706,0.0020751157,0.0071136616,0.0063611465,0.0026522093,0.011024717,0.0015376623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10532668,0.00081138295,0.0006483862,0.0010616487,0.01658735,0.007787419,0.006434416,0.009038994,0.00021787987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017300124,0.00048773029,0.08143295,0.001222336,0.000119960925,0.008349332,0.06813553,0.0010692934,0.0018788433,0.64435846,0.022585584,0.170187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029262307,0.0009759573,0.28392616,0.009995209,0.0005448122,0.009530297,0.06287597,0.0074668177,0.00311779,0.43154916,0.18925488,0.00047038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15925762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2844289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15925762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010684777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038527913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3166613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030013073","doi":"10.7202/042657ar","title":"Faut-il réformer la Cour suprême du Canada ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Nomination; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Charter; Subject (documents); Due Process Clause","score_opus":0.008819078932390347,"score_gpt":0.24540869726955652,"score_spread":0.23658961833716619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030013073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025704574,0.047401775,0.002674602,0.72059274,0.0035530683,0.00004854134,0.00036002413,0.000096485,0.19956824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69793403,0.027877145,0.00474236,0.08452539,0.0013506945,0.00006167227,0.0002385021,0.00009539879,0.18317488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916257,0.0014540895,0.00012748578,0.0006802936,0.0041158926,0.0019966036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256694,0.0016591965,0.00032511135,0.00022246747,0.0040478054,0.0011783802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047400524,0.00035200125,0.0005974851,0.0017733909,0.018260624,0.0146764405,0.0016329398,0.006097576,0.009812179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016374262,0.0003193086,0.00043014155,0.0028429003,0.010972874,0.00523592,0.0020162994,0.007829687,0.00083470717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043450153,0.000022113112,0.003149804,0.00011957622,0.000028998997,0.00025280222,0.0029059877,0.00037714417,0.00026241085,0.8498145,0.10832709,0.034696233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000326943,0.000022101469,0.0072870473,0.0006086028,0.000048753267,0.00016017583,0.008391224,0.00078714144,0.0006796807,0.060925562,0.92096853,0.000088420464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97546536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88855946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11144055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17039707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80856156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030437824","doi":"10.7202/043304ar","title":"L'évaluation des objectifs législatifs en vertu de l'article premier de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017494695588873586,"score_gpt":0.286758690292126,"score_spread":0.2692639947032524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030437824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02982726,0.011237839,0.012080041,0.03342728,0.0015424696,0.00021194936,0.000968185,0.00012813273,0.9105768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6080276,0.010624251,0.010345815,0.016053798,0.00090858643,0.0005410617,0.00070559495,0.00030165495,0.35249168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97940093,0.0030536884,0.00046776806,0.0015164127,0.013657058,0.0019042438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793703,0.004360354,0.00062315736,0.0006957739,0.0059792623,0.00040443917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00745476,0.0006184876,0.0009259044,0.0027578138,0.006562552,0.016836293,0.0017090597,0.0031926956,0.013643688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016231667,0.00034106526,0.00075845857,0.003905654,0.009601337,0.0030579607,0.0026754695,0.0061767874,0.0011797673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015955962,0.00001174053,0.00089168735,0.000096389886,0.000014177066,0.000038548253,0.0032793821,0.00040730703,0.00020902383,0.96889985,0.013685944,0.012449939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023992086,0.00006510615,0.014211562,0.0008128518,0.00008337159,0.00008622112,0.0070005315,0.0010584972,0.0017617999,0.094471335,0.88030595,0.00011874153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5519517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66109407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96064824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03935177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053420074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90137386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030652659","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0020","title":"The Contextual Turn: Iacobucci's Legacy and the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Standard of review; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Scrutiny; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02791156109271762,"score_gpt":0.3187172411592737,"score_spread":0.29080568006655605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030652659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02546862,0.08125174,0.023981024,0.5878915,0.0051814686,0.00019842564,0.00030416646,0.00017368766,0.2755494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8213431,0.018625364,0.015367444,0.123348966,0.00590525,0.0002722116,0.00011115292,0.00024560743,0.014780905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95414066,0.01608256,0.0018628556,0.007943206,0.014806485,0.0051641753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94312996,0.032323886,0.0027828077,0.0042416323,0.013903984,0.003617678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02722309,0.00087616284,0.0017861803,0.006896297,0.028796079,0.040068947,0.0044121635,0.012969508,0.0032401616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054268394,0.0011691249,0.0012657336,0.006926338,0.101335354,0.013823535,0.009145907,0.019947784,0.00048015645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012378225,0.0000071117224,0.00055807456,0.00005858706,0.000011756352,0.00009785508,0.0066372547,0.00013068595,0.00009760278,0.97892064,0.008530914,0.004937081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004663955,0.000033583852,0.0054468713,0.0011294394,0.000089764035,0.00020259625,0.0090011265,0.0004919196,0.00035401105,0.58967483,0.39330873,0.00022045159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6649632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70941293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6649632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09255461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08213367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6740198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031021223","doi":"10.4000/vertigo.8931","title":"Droit d’accès à l’information environnementale : pierre d’assise du développement durable","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"VertigO","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01752975278729941,"score_gpt":0.26490729986263745,"score_spread":0.24737754707533804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031021223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09799119,0.030482316,0.016698759,0.20987186,0.0008560909,0.00019994195,0.0006532839,0.00019967915,0.6430469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74155736,0.01698703,0.009289874,0.008076688,0.0002620365,0.000115347815,0.00023398231,0.000091126065,0.22338663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925309,0.0023928317,0.00030267314,0.00075971906,0.0031216058,0.00089226826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148096,0.0070572095,0.0014298579,0.0019420463,0.0065035643,0.0015864085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008926946,0.00031011723,0.00037976776,0.002921435,0.0075204726,0.0103498055,0.001657097,0.00341743,0.013238709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021703828,0.00036223265,0.00034876334,0.002543036,0.010837647,0.0083742775,0.004454607,0.003940923,0.0013549344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056954123,0.000049185255,0.006261009,0.00026628122,0.000022908218,0.0008440526,0.037078716,0.0005467541,0.0005014963,0.8222682,0.031896193,0.10020823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019975421,0.000085822445,0.024319572,0.0010866073,0.000040021332,0.00060936296,0.014270027,0.00085642294,0.0016279437,0.08339392,0.8735981,0.00009228661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5094498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5150631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5094498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02476823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03374781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98687834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033722102","doi":"10.7202/1008030ar","title":"L’interprétation du droit par les juristes : la place de la délibération éthique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017540849897331033,"score_gpt":0.30058089237453794,"score_spread":0.28304004247720693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033722102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09581785,0.00753804,0.12240788,0.119021535,0.0011765524,0.00011005933,0.000094031515,0.00019063467,0.6536435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645867,0.0013054284,0.0076809507,0.0031673256,0.00031789354,0.000106286716,0.000030090821,0.00019908034,0.02260627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9457759,0.043123636,0.00084817165,0.002775092,0.0056210305,0.0018561495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776159,0.01625736,0.0012104424,0.00216844,0.0019208821,0.0008271552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02269559,0.0006986661,0.00072427024,0.0019884403,0.012645168,0.021184279,0.002093404,0.006232957,0.005226657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022648945,0.00058722834,0.00067792134,0.0020540007,0.06784829,0.012783289,0.008985059,0.010140118,0.001087013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013367986,0.000007190968,0.00025917747,0.00003988634,0.0000059786016,0.00008484694,0.060176432,0.00015517513,0.00019302707,0.9331066,0.0012808746,0.0046773693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003052129,0.000049682218,0.0010082857,0.0005552623,0.000018440594,0.00019674114,0.06778788,0.0009829217,0.0009855988,0.6612188,0.26710752,0.000058391648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009977662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009772818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02269559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010564515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011416036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120027184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033744269","doi":"10.1350/ijps.5.2.112.14322","title":"The Right to Silence and Undercover Police Operations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Police Science & Management","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law enforcement; Criminology; Political science; Law; Enforcement; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.023395089049803995,"score_gpt":0.37365521652212325,"score_spread":0.35026012747231927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033744269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66530496,0.0066789603,0.0092465645,0.07811062,0.00040676794,0.00004039305,0.00011140952,0.000033782922,0.2400665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967325,0.0005488397,0.00016781189,0.0010881451,0.00006666221,0.00001296634,0.000010127332,0.000009122986,0.0013638495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749154,0.01715477,0.0011783191,0.0011438088,0.0031202475,0.0024874338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8955389,0.07035457,0.019772505,0.005497999,0.0041246456,0.0047113425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01223879,0.00019092528,0.00039240744,0.0014369888,0.0048341355,0.0076932115,0.001164956,0.0032263817,0.004129334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06862728,0.00031653407,0.00031088098,0.0009311066,0.041169867,0.0064816945,0.008849843,0.004263428,0.00046224718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014586115,0.00009470922,0.0378665,0.0001622591,0.000036719408,0.0019981845,0.48051772,0.00031688059,0.00074028,0.4318401,0.0046220804,0.041658714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051605817,0.0001829108,0.059440307,0.0016110049,0.000057918267,0.00452687,0.5200314,0.0006904245,0.0015290898,0.31055698,0.10116397,0.00015751987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005667263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01223879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022945297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031479283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06472564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033979548","doi":"10.7202/1000617ar","title":"L’héritage de l’affaire Roncarelli c. Duplessis 1959-2009","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02911325364606312,"score_gpt":0.30967330317632874,"score_spread":0.28056004953026564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033979548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019422874,0.043566268,0.002170417,0.07766478,0.0055744937,0.00013829047,0.0014963428,0.0001348666,0.84983176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32082564,0.017850285,0.0015420981,0.045647096,0.0031670213,0.00014910317,0.000647206,0.00017251528,0.60999906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949608,0.00054856396,0.00022855183,0.0008081697,0.0024968644,0.0009570925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969392,0.001009748,0.00042772383,0.00032817715,0.001050209,0.00024496752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033281078,0.00055129087,0.0004070346,0.0020214058,0.008476927,0.004828459,0.0015911048,0.005420659,0.015702419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010563827,0.00070871203,0.00049007544,0.0014220956,0.0045213825,0.0038335342,0.0034193504,0.010253421,0.0032901762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007754524,0.000027178943,0.0025741663,0.00016949816,0.000019115245,0.0006503282,0.004588059,0.00009135416,0.00047885516,0.49714988,0.4389726,0.055201426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007230487,0.000015621727,0.0032877265,0.00029345497,0.000015560156,0.00022164984,0.00031962263,0.00003950301,0.0006841775,0.00419972,0.99089116,0.000024604191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29796544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43822297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7020346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016581558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013650215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034604088","doi":"10.7202/042563ar","title":"Une doctrine d'abus de procédure revigorée en droit pénal canadien","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Denial; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.009680553915968441,"score_gpt":0.2699886804967939,"score_spread":0.26030812658082547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034604088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026353272,0.010201957,0.027834734,0.019675696,0.0009781338,0.00007886624,0.00012159207,0.00016157952,0.9145941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8843198,0.0069922362,0.0082510505,0.006123202,0.000732466,0.00011728746,0.000061403116,0.00008413134,0.093318544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864269,0.001703675,0.00034351877,0.0010537158,0.008370749,0.0021014598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494725,0.0020883945,0.0003312397,0.00073042884,0.0016265999,0.00027616264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053854026,0.0005936247,0.0005854177,0.0027073477,0.008586248,0.011139921,0.0022550272,0.0063826274,0.0048341057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011381447,0.0005339246,0.00083632424,0.0021375166,0.035351314,0.004480938,0.004546058,0.0092900405,0.0008959814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032635526,0.0000028561853,0.00006846261,0.000010171459,0.0000014159586,0.000052751904,0.0011657687,0.000074552765,0.000081793325,0.9935361,0.0009043854,0.004098532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031646807,0.000053726555,0.0021448291,0.00058151176,0.000042226315,0.00063167827,0.002353965,0.0009605574,0.0013610809,0.39283732,0.5989032,0.00009829125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4455221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40483254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98117906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018820921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026371928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88585776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07964043449649322,"score_gpt":0.3457996897785181,"score_spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037174929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06041097,0.093133844,0.0012623508,0.4770701,0.0018511892,0.00007682192,0.00032722473,0.000039021517,0.36582842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7553086,0.031439863,0.00089805044,0.17396882,0.0015747523,0.00007720176,0.00016889983,0.000030813408,0.03653289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547464,0.0007989603,0.00016053439,0.00066401274,0.0017202824,0.0011815336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438053,0.0033557857,0.0006164531,0.00019261772,0.0009139792,0.0005407056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402265,0.00040833477,0.00072127476,0.0024415604,0.012175446,0.009808049,0.002228606,0.014239069,0.0024297384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012359291,0.00041471602,0.00058581657,0.00198233,0.021144744,0.00726976,0.0028149006,0.013266795,0.00035037426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026779977,0.000026938842,0.0030878366,0.00008339556,0.000015846832,0.00054127024,0.006879505,0.00011898723,0.00011450465,0.90993303,0.06321676,0.015955092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007071778,0.00009971854,0.030332481,0.0031555938,0.00016235342,0.0006832591,0.014630158,0.0005861226,0.0013673883,0.24056552,0.70811737,0.00022935604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7287629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7698148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27123708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04601696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028548304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54566884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037436209","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0196","title":"Professor Waldron Goes to Canada (One More Time): The Canadian Charter and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legitimacy; Legislature; State (computer science); Law and economics; Separation of powers; Bill of rights; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01689867215698869,"score_gpt":0.29956660198958646,"score_spread":0.28266792983259775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037436209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009837596,0.023906244,0.0003227676,0.9591307,0.0055066943,0.000009225218,0.00003931,0.000012189883,0.010089014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10301928,0.031494465,0.001669967,0.7971985,0.010038095,0.0000361835,0.00005117302,0.00008139332,0.05641095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163,0.0015610476,0.00029314213,0.0012148075,0.004090532,0.0012102989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98592025,0.00615485,0.0004912843,0.00031690748,0.005528907,0.0015878222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009288014,0.00042693576,0.0008085419,0.002043036,0.01345699,0.010619494,0.0022981502,0.0127346255,0.004209461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026428593,0.00036732192,0.00053557754,0.002691027,0.02176608,0.006611433,0.0020342292,0.013667077,0.00064455764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026872256,0.000008896993,0.001057992,0.00010259502,0.000017728595,0.00023433179,0.002590488,0.00010167446,0.00012327262,0.25231045,0.720446,0.022979645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002181175,0.0000131588795,0.0023076062,0.0003387266,0.000021389465,0.000143305,0.0019903413,0.00019112937,0.00019217558,0.035937663,0.9587594,0.00008341968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8550801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9233485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14491987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042621206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07634185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30923998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037504092","doi":"10.7202/042667ar","title":"La justice constitutionnelle en France","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Sociology","score_opus":0.011285378349540652,"score_gpt":0.28425290092337385,"score_spread":0.2729675225738332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037504092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10538683,0.08793011,0.010461366,0.10907192,0.0025936577,0.00015843382,0.0007912363,0.0004223292,0.6831841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83095956,0.020934861,0.0062440997,0.0087315235,0.002264963,0.00027857514,0.00044589536,0.00010641105,0.13003412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990695,0.004119886,0.00024464107,0.00089728297,0.0024890096,0.0015542676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969612,0.0016344484,0.00022414429,0.00020581194,0.0006544112,0.00031997266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068415804,0.00070929417,0.0008731397,0.002747183,0.009611994,0.011458892,0.0007295798,0.005925893,0.0072458447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009922261,0.00037893167,0.00091802864,0.0022330116,0.009229079,0.003007953,0.0020394197,0.0075567584,0.00080490275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020958985,0.000028210014,0.0005923752,0.000059364676,0.000018313207,0.00023132288,0.0026416543,0.00048544173,0.0003145052,0.96035844,0.015609382,0.019640021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088751694,0.000053972544,0.008897699,0.00029410637,0.000017208811,0.00029101945,0.0022571404,0.000622536,0.00038640795,0.045794196,0.9412227,0.0000742667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5106663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35559872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5106663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033902586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024525838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98443097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038744157","doi":"10.7202/004738ar","title":"Judiciarisation et déjudiciarisation : la part de la poursuite et de la défense","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.3380579277308897,"score_gpt":0.4541859260833446,"score_spread":0.11612799835245491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038744157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16239496,0.04863078,0.015857985,0.18122874,0.001291838,0.000079198304,0.00013919036,0.00009057895,0.5902867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9171487,0.0058805305,0.0012535211,0.007913088,0.0003033741,0.000044643886,0.00003254147,0.00004994836,0.06737363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99014777,0.0049599227,0.00018622703,0.0008689126,0.0021433772,0.001693799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400735,0.0021659597,0.0009152469,0.00058698544,0.0013715382,0.0009528891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004678042,0.0004184477,0.00037891665,0.0013332748,0.010439646,0.008519134,0.0011888994,0.0038464388,0.007388728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008863987,0.0002847459,0.00024098404,0.0018674673,0.038694438,0.0037907748,0.004161928,0.0049550924,0.00080910913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030381198,0.000024190307,0.004333954,0.00014164356,0.000015071371,0.00019672648,0.05250528,0.00021383559,0.00045759173,0.8995535,0.010120303,0.032407466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028666784,0.00008817695,0.055819266,0.001015368,0.0000371723,0.0005277324,0.049493212,0.000846251,0.0011413456,0.18329304,0.7075867,0.00012302515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36669037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4380544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36669037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023063298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027118096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72911197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038960565","doi":"10.5235/09615768.24.1.1","title":"Blurring the Civil-Criminal Divide for Process Rights: Closed Material Procedures and the Curious Character of Preventive Security Measures","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"King s Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Suspect; Certificate; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Terrorism; Preventive detention; Order (exchange); Character (mathematics); Business; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.017749985142434244,"score_gpt":0.3005557168032032,"score_spread":0.28280573166076894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038960565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045834374,0.017618656,0.15512612,0.4443722,0.0020097643,0.00028013694,0.000114110764,0.00020669431,0.3344379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91003263,0.00376327,0.030376688,0.040584445,0.0019728583,0.00047981713,0.00003670956,0.00018024349,0.012573374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90080714,0.053518582,0.0050807768,0.009029374,0.025450457,0.006113637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7527705,0.18823385,0.010916465,0.0288441,0.014336004,0.0048990846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10503087,0.0008844441,0.0018066034,0.0033530486,0.012953255,0.026877511,0.00530949,0.02890562,0.0044854563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17633015,0.0013605679,0.0016650368,0.0021709278,0.1469418,0.03828417,0.016425813,0.030667096,0.00103778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010359695,0.0000084956855,0.00012669883,0.000025642055,0.000003732251,0.000050921255,0.0020959694,0.000073316325,0.00004939719,0.99259746,0.0008277795,0.004130241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145999,0.000027803377,0.00035712656,0.0003850201,0.0000123256195,0.0001418595,0.0011050737,0.00037177705,0.00025756858,0.9715252,0.025748381,0.000036445672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010927567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008640244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10503087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011736745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02483018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55546296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040229749","doi":"10.1080/02722010609481400","title":"Cross-Border Crime Stories: American Media, Canadian Law, and Murder in the Internet Age","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Publication; Freedom of information; Criminology; Freedom of the press; Sociology","score_opus":0.043130208280106365,"score_gpt":0.4224151373906914,"score_spread":0.37928492911058503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040229749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20548712,0.03144515,0.000327009,0.23853645,0.0016448871,0.000058069076,0.00043624677,0.00006369489,0.5220014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207746,0.025344135,0.0002623905,0.029510029,0.00086892507,0.00003647456,0.00018602159,0.0000531647,0.02296431],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964882,0.0006173705,0.00007686132,0.00021261592,0.0014797694,0.001125162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98594296,0.005831799,0.0014754944,0.00029235875,0.0037700606,0.002687366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026208388,0.0004020839,0.00038779556,0.007692407,0.033344116,0.022508927,0.0020944322,0.0042120004,0.010272659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017547175,0.00039077818,0.00025427976,0.008155265,0.019350328,0.009222249,0.005938206,0.005387053,0.00052821345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072359915,0.00015774336,0.022865716,0.00024188524,0.00002475922,0.0019270773,0.5656498,0.00006948618,0.00025460392,0.17929588,0.1495334,0.079907246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016570391,0.000021527034,0.023833938,0.0006353422,0.000038956267,0.00051956304,0.3693624,0.000088751316,0.00015977658,0.0069898814,0.59825563,0.000077619174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05649907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05649907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04726315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40993136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204023354","doi":"","title":"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Complément, jurisprudence et doctrine, 15e édition (H.Reid, J.Reid).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Computer science; Code (set theory); Philosophy; Programming language; Theology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.028119077550317464,"score_gpt":0.2980201067990636,"score_spread":0.26990102924874615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204023354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073812874,0.16625726,0.01592169,0.040989816,0.010962054,0.0007001408,0.042521995,0.0015523683,0.71371335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077380285,0.045416515,0.01769044,0.011569108,0.0010126284,0.0009537418,0.012435597,0.00063446135,0.8329072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598277,0.0004186738,0.00026577065,0.00027733782,0.002628974,0.00042656998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350184,0.00065535447,0.0002787115,0.0002880808,0.005037792,0.0002382807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024774866,0.0011277738,0.00083565904,0.004252648,0.004939267,0.0038425091,0.0019515798,0.003761913,0.029976897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007450707,0.00080629456,0.0007630977,0.006233223,0.0028458526,0.0014993007,0.00081171276,0.0036486934,0.0061642663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034795754,0.0000345803,0.001489219,0.00026024794,0.000014864011,0.00009527162,0.00083700457,0.0003556601,0.00046796782,0.092583135,0.84200495,0.06182222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013446868,0.000012030393,0.0077897804,0.00031378845,0.000012891634,0.00009448137,0.00023545418,0.00024154659,0.00023908723,0.0034834645,0.98752636,0.000037620357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97692037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98237026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045394056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045394056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09114565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32935846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204119075","doi":"10.29173/alr292","title":"The Police Officer’s Plight: The Intersection of Policing and the Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Law; Law enforcement; Officer; Criminal justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Crime control; Situational ethics; Criminology; Pretext; Discretion; CLARITY; Sociology","score_opus":0.04921144117726327,"score_gpt":0.34931352379587144,"score_spread":0.30010208261860816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204119075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036437288,0.9402945,0.00036936425,0.023680836,0.0006605142,0.0000144236765,0.0000124275375,0.000005873153,0.031318277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14377715,0.8429581,0.0006745171,0.00749697,0.0010954238,0.000032502085,0.000023060993,0.000013522423,0.003928794],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898633,0.0067109773,0.00031837946,0.00030922383,0.0020976185,0.0007005695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881847,0.007886717,0.0012220343,0.00023412028,0.002064965,0.00040746795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064245583,0.0003814077,0.0011172971,0.0060036494,0.0028784478,0.0058029336,0.0011135378,0.0027837285,0.0029280277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014089331,0.00042862215,0.00042442675,0.0059200004,0.010930892,0.0036450482,0.002255951,0.0024110638,0.00049335544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000740279,0.000101637925,0.0060839914,0.0112299,0.00017537775,0.00079992344,0.011584972,0.00065590494,0.00022529271,0.3316823,0.048827052,0.5885596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039780716,0.00017025866,0.03148038,0.04074328,0.00021046588,0.0007144827,0.020478662,0.00018278374,0.00022357916,0.08622641,0.8194625,0.000067527646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10958141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14641109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010881229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026164878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21788716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041703113","doi":"10.7202/042278ar","title":"L'enquête publique et le pouvoir de condamnation pour outrage au tribunal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Legislator; Punishment (psychology); Jurisdiction; Power (physics); Political science; Conviction; Psychology; Social psychology; Legislation","score_opus":0.016334197338007977,"score_gpt":0.29744166155342705,"score_spread":0.2811074642154191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041703113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04074893,0.021925073,0.010255252,0.21785055,0.01961228,0.00023744984,0.0005864846,0.00058282533,0.6882012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1398325,0.0028998624,0.0022669146,0.008537369,0.0018167256,0.00007286527,0.00010069216,0.0001973733,0.84427565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944019,0.0013695417,0.0002035216,0.0004981088,0.0017458344,0.001781022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254215,0.002435331,0.0005389354,0.0006465647,0.0018638306,0.001973276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060125743,0.00053399435,0.0005147213,0.0010216872,0.011886996,0.012278109,0.0016877635,0.0070445435,0.0540231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012881137,0.0005327021,0.00049335125,0.00094047555,0.007720141,0.0047908295,0.003648704,0.0062201926,0.008525483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007483741,0.000065807064,0.002320383,0.00025811628,0.0000151990525,0.00076296966,0.023415381,0.0001481785,0.0011117856,0.6920729,0.21606025,0.06369413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009286943,0.000026136298,0.0025586244,0.0000825011,0.000004120089,0.00016125673,0.00420616,0.000093716204,0.0001907707,0.0027543267,0.98989254,0.00002067859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39242563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5415411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39242563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012926731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030327784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7802829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042046526","doi":"10.7202/043466ar","title":"La concrétisation de la primauté du droit dans l'ordre juridique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00824723053923736,"score_gpt":0.26514582993134655,"score_spread":0.2568985993921092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042046526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20313908,0.016592933,0.015257137,0.045224775,0.0006365794,0.00009653341,0.000689234,0.00006463843,0.7182991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94232506,0.005582209,0.002270165,0.0016358825,0.00013177776,0.000033032342,0.00009892597,0.000033173932,0.04788979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965,0.00064794923,0.00013708997,0.0004186109,0.0015456886,0.00075063494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990182,0.0041079917,0.0012899468,0.0005019009,0.0031907344,0.00072752795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032173176,0.00031327398,0.00042756094,0.00296157,0.008778627,0.011624203,0.0014971866,0.002164292,0.009842929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01106965,0.00031988721,0.0003703271,0.0039594127,0.019783758,0.0036939355,0.003856752,0.004525625,0.0004958074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002544884,0.0000075333237,0.0075093713,0.00017020483,0.00001716891,0.00025499557,0.025233755,0.0001795131,0.00027947352,0.9460363,0.003876965,0.016409311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083774,0.00007193653,0.15093906,0.0022377623,0.00020143797,0.0011133829,0.07538169,0.0012541963,0.0025390016,0.19258827,0.573405,0.0002373979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7368439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88628674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7368439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026217159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044826157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5294118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042170054","doi":"10.1080/13642980310001726126","title":"The new globalism in Canadian charter of rights interpretation: extradition, the death penalty, and the courts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Human rights; Law; Discretion; Charter; Political science; Politics; State (computer science); Bill of rights; International human rights law; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.020557963312995208,"score_gpt":0.31866664947925455,"score_spread":0.29810868616625935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042170054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035751335,0.012858179,0.015368258,0.42769822,0.0021152305,0.000049781385,0.00018083082,0.00010009615,0.50587815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776264,0.006867443,0.011389732,0.057663772,0.0011625224,0.000050604547,0.000099381716,0.00018079925,0.044959314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848263,0.004618253,0.0004804608,0.0016710475,0.0057113236,0.0026926498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98957026,0.0048205126,0.00043377496,0.0007653247,0.0035442328,0.0008658204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011075864,0.000575738,0.0007066446,0.0030408562,0.01657722,0.020907205,0.0025560693,0.0072864247,0.0050527127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01602244,0.00048865343,0.0006379262,0.0045958417,0.07657715,0.0073129237,0.0059122317,0.012707313,0.00027068812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068833615,0.0000026055282,0.00051537686,0.000021237136,0.0000034975117,0.00010275864,0.0081547685,0.00013793954,0.00006452371,0.97337455,0.009584591,0.008031239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026763173,0.000018250184,0.0048787426,0.00057674287,0.00005357402,0.0003172145,0.023053166,0.0007973612,0.0004728353,0.42016512,0.5494785,0.00016171753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9174456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0825544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07762927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10669784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56324244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042851964","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0035","title":"Constitutional rights in the balance: Modern exclusionary rules and the toleration of police lawlessness in the search for truth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawlessness; Discretion; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Law; Balance (ability); Human rights; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04441986453828719,"score_gpt":0.2839734639625264,"score_spread":0.23955359942423918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042851964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16274114,0.009629585,0.16746582,0.19631918,0.0011212442,0.00017682901,0.00019053182,0.00018891419,0.4621668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98028576,0.0008592107,0.008015716,0.0055952608,0.0006991418,0.00012351843,0.000028217446,0.000052400595,0.00434082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96577924,0.016280815,0.0025158704,0.0055114515,0.0072246436,0.0026879772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94570065,0.035278037,0.004864986,0.0085968515,0.0037132304,0.0018461794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03722671,0.00039900898,0.0011937165,0.0022733891,0.008783193,0.015011399,0.0025584628,0.00986242,0.0026946627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06369503,0.00077573064,0.00087633904,0.0014441472,0.11089819,0.019208243,0.009761929,0.012046411,0.0004930696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013173205,0.0000074229843,0.00020152006,0.000012981037,0.0000054290676,0.000047756326,0.0020843544,0.00011567545,0.000121546465,0.9948397,0.0003488517,0.00220143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023006216,0.000014265758,0.00022197895,0.000071717586,0.000008309121,0.000049364346,0.00047543435,0.0002080885,0.00017186574,0.98860955,0.010128111,0.000018394672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056431927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041168714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03722671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077416124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19687599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043119841","doi":"10.7202/042675ar","title":"Le recours au Comité des droits de l'homme de l'O.N.U. : une illusion?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitution; Charter; International human rights law; Right to property; Cultural rights","score_opus":0.015574079372907798,"score_gpt":0.2824062114197666,"score_spread":0.2668321320468588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043119841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026797064,0.04495255,0.00079432846,0.37515432,0.017806461,0.00001629859,0.0003378701,0.000116968855,0.5340242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3151059,0.016118454,0.00067147805,0.042481262,0.00366119,0.000019075527,0.00012227148,0.00018504236,0.6216353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985752,0.0004883862,0.000031550375,0.0001755645,0.00036754075,0.00036168715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.0002420288,0.000090663045,0.00007042526,0.00020190736,0.00018385645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013572703,0.00031658358,0.00030522552,0.0005135784,0.009285429,0.006991426,0.00065039925,0.0026375016,0.01808127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035815209,0.00022973397,0.00015935437,0.0008902415,0.006692354,0.003709381,0.0017979437,0.004536928,0.003264624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006040699,0.000018595054,0.0015322798,0.00008436424,0.000007471025,0.00056376,0.040074468,0.0000642926,0.0002843955,0.38159764,0.5099778,0.065734416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002217866,0.0000048087627,0.00077646034,0.000081884304,0.0000012296381,0.00010339573,0.008124506,0.000016603615,0.00007085739,0.0031586047,0.9876494,0.000009947174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3519973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44509125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3519973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074698157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008175763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6998969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044105069","doi":"10.3917/riges.303.0059","title":"La responsabilité civile des vérificateurs après la tempête financière : point de mire sur une réforme canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04452409577872107,"score_gpt":0.2813241461053062,"score_spread":0.23680005032658513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044105069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10306178,0.027274618,0.009800582,0.45536974,0.0020667464,0.00020074814,0.00031707162,0.00015417302,0.40175447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8363405,0.0070311856,0.0028476059,0.013369441,0.0005240522,0.00011742393,0.00010749489,0.000039189064,0.13962314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839496,0.0033032978,0.00030748904,0.0015345142,0.005785565,0.0051195277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97450167,0.0056533315,0.0014977381,0.002584887,0.009972116,0.0057902313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668012,0.0004967852,0.00061031774,0.0026575022,0.01034399,0.018176489,0.002330199,0.007733584,0.011472339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024949463,0.0007155055,0.00062544446,0.0034186547,0.01516723,0.005551212,0.005676434,0.008370034,0.0012843478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057831352,0.00007610347,0.006102237,0.00010375291,0.000036147954,0.00022888495,0.008396219,0.001387873,0.0002976186,0.9280763,0.022932872,0.032304194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008766194,0.000109944325,0.02521854,0.00091591093,0.00007164756,0.00017710158,0.0096697,0.0023548922,0.0009780427,0.110046946,0.85020167,0.00016793598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84223944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83387744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9145959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0854041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.159396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.619653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044152050","doi":"10.7202/042391ar","title":"La connaissance judiciaire des actes réglementaires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory interpretation; State (computer science); Supreme court; Position (finance); Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Business","score_opus":0.025447904117276897,"score_gpt":0.3144374386135144,"score_spread":0.28898953449623754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044152050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032546345,0.056099575,0.037035476,0.081768796,0.0052837757,0.0002615636,0.0006334837,0.00059569225,0.7857753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6433936,0.017058404,0.022710942,0.021089707,0.0027344702,0.00031208684,0.00033112217,0.00030361698,0.2920661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95244294,0.011872824,0.0016566545,0.0032412838,0.026512597,0.004273648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96347237,0.018287841,0.001920373,0.0032155842,0.0115896845,0.0015141875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018892026,0.0010213591,0.0010570427,0.0034078602,0.010777133,0.016420644,0.0030978054,0.008115994,0.008671992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033524293,0.0008573475,0.0012831667,0.0031846988,0.018738247,0.0030443363,0.0017927481,0.0124314455,0.0024269936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002978749,0.00002231627,0.0015206906,0.00010406399,0.000026633992,0.00019411885,0.0038532112,0.0007310674,0.0005790943,0.9106937,0.038268384,0.043976866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026874312,0.00003632254,0.009643144,0.0004460135,0.000021989468,0.00024577096,0.0013180734,0.0012159452,0.00068508484,0.029982317,0.95627654,0.00010197679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8831217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8704282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8831217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062142354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45087647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044354767","doi":"10.7202/042777ar","title":"Ce qui est abusif au sens de l'article 8 de la Charte canadienne lors de la recherche de preuves","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Supreme court; Charter; Search and seizure; Legislation; Section (typography); Humanities; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.057091189295126896,"score_gpt":0.3399804534344192,"score_spread":0.2828892641392923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044354767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009985532,0.015984483,0.023162972,0.25082618,0.019114748,0.00032493522,0.00085110986,0.0007613977,0.6789887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2616999,0.011727866,0.03745164,0.10337984,0.0053691445,0.00077149255,0.0007286242,0.00054541224,0.57832605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791464,0.0035234008,0.0012187618,0.0018689828,0.0113086095,0.0029338945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97766864,0.010555542,0.0009972844,0.0022034338,0.007432452,0.001142711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012986055,0.0005879555,0.0009048812,0.0022588377,0.007963804,0.017107112,0.0017659293,0.011449119,0.011223141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035833895,0.000562113,0.0011433924,0.0023445897,0.0138748465,0.005220141,0.0024095753,0.013554402,0.0039073224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027415306,0.00002254038,0.00064845383,0.000107934524,0.000007815993,0.00025022592,0.002881635,0.00018550134,0.0006147995,0.8607016,0.110942625,0.023609454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009418868,0.000021202924,0.0014387098,0.00022943119,0.000010859469,0.00014809193,0.0008283887,0.00011312406,0.00059974263,0.023408376,0.97313833,0.000054259763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49558204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5497979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50441796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017550388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053662084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046543401","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.3.515","title":"The Rule Against Admitting Exculpatory Statements of Accused Persons: A Shiny Coin That has Lost its Currency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Innocence; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17075454377666324,"score_gpt":0.41894143163557107,"score_spread":0.24818688785890783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046543401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009722902,0.07549464,0.04877661,0.8014881,0.02242565,0.00008401316,0.00019232508,0.0001908628,0.041624878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34471557,0.053595997,0.04204183,0.49486238,0.045537166,0.00044652945,0.0002311515,0.0004240355,0.018145394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94985723,0.013853038,0.0053780666,0.008485472,0.020769881,0.0016563314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8565334,0.109040834,0.0063848156,0.009226529,0.016151082,0.0026633951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08280656,0.00083038915,0.0032834902,0.00410348,0.008127187,0.016830035,0.006826547,0.03851474,0.0016884692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14686887,0.0010066067,0.001269249,0.003653913,0.06845255,0.019121956,0.0061432775,0.046327405,0.001641486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074735675,0.00003339811,0.0007037693,0.00029580356,0.00004169222,0.00011767623,0.0010803058,0.00022204373,0.00027588522,0.90106416,0.04754399,0.048546486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010195498,0.00016915365,0.0014262687,0.002767458,0.00016283382,0.00034707246,0.0007418154,0.0013864542,0.0009185465,0.76893353,0.22287406,0.00017099552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074009746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006581109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043430664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009887686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43792814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047125366","doi":"10.7202/045087ar","title":"De Dunsmuir à Khosa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03396127961799788,"score_gpt":0.3236435114768137,"score_spread":0.2896822318588158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047125366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17669488,0.011092984,0.004722695,0.053486697,0.0020880145,0.0003154349,0.00070776505,0.00020805457,0.7506835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6035689,0.0034612278,0.0027128146,0.011089111,0.00017231239,0.00012590725,0.00025526082,0.00009973437,0.37851474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966781,0.00066180184,0.00011675126,0.0005245368,0.00100545,0.0010134011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713373,0.000642944,0.0002952671,0.00026629408,0.0010696391,0.0005920018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219883,0.00035862377,0.00041165206,0.00081188756,0.008622275,0.006556061,0.0007842854,0.0020544406,0.021875706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00472545,0.0003590894,0.00043631528,0.0013941481,0.0042707156,0.0014951861,0.0026453126,0.0044931727,0.0020663803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040848853,0.0001012201,0.018382143,0.0004417926,0.00006739112,0.001228,0.03528146,0.00074338913,0.0030381905,0.7694365,0.073756926,0.097114444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004484606,0.00007389537,0.029907405,0.00035440747,0.000032198557,0.00023423709,0.00958219,0.00029649254,0.0011068551,0.0075242785,0.95077574,0.00006745082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62311906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7256806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62311906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025280267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037315384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75820094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047437190","doi":"10.7202/043164ar","title":"Recent Trends in Criminal Law Reform","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Openness to experience; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminal procedure; Judicial reform; Law; Law reform; Dispute resolution; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.028522203600407126,"score_gpt":0.3119152222262939,"score_spread":0.2833930186258868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047437190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013453057,0.5235472,0.003745353,0.3611494,0.003348623,0.00004953399,0.00021953309,0.00009109661,0.09439627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25061265,0.5929644,0.009294405,0.10412958,0.01927267,0.00015386015,0.0005163669,0.000120169956,0.022935893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563867,0.001538446,0.00030780307,0.0008074734,0.0012064582,0.0005011575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817284,0.00917093,0.001815116,0.00082819303,0.0053319163,0.0011253793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063330526,0.0003684865,0.00069653534,0.004636636,0.0017565398,0.005959117,0.0012083425,0.0048846384,0.010420983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020048842,0.00034120606,0.00056125346,0.0075860783,0.006302023,0.006824311,0.0017999071,0.005125392,0.001658591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094503936,0.00017428509,0.0018873598,0.0020942984,0.00003274039,0.0001285311,0.0009421831,0.00057520746,0.00041426494,0.63018197,0.06368183,0.29979286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024633257,0.00007748342,0.0059596966,0.0014464402,0.000016785785,0.00026445588,0.0009882438,0.0004403139,0.00028325748,0.09252452,0.89794964,0.000024606372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004702403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061900117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010420983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008880558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063998112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06443322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049432150","doi":"10.7202/050745ar","title":"Is Picketing a Crime?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Picketing; Contempt; Political science; Law; Legislation; Criminal law; Trespass; Charter","score_opus":0.08219316870775212,"score_gpt":0.3518721676520014,"score_spread":0.2696789989442493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049432150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34398273,0.04245297,0.0021756357,0.40713152,0.0023684257,0.00007461646,0.0005291264,0.000065967404,0.20121905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94403666,0.027387345,0.00040166976,0.017087007,0.0022357567,0.00002618731,0.00020520938,0.000025269544,0.008594785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970049,0.000884895,0.0002256465,0.00036986102,0.00073186547,0.00078276737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882643,0.004246978,0.004478362,0.0007297716,0.0011871939,0.0010934065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021248267,0.0003038922,0.00055182294,0.0034850931,0.0052611614,0.0061812443,0.0010413477,0.004939752,0.010987917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021823019,0.00035210277,0.00045040893,0.0037972596,0.012715409,0.007890065,0.0022754963,0.0052102082,0.0011392962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004083841,0.00037668497,0.21813259,0.0010875879,0.00014891126,0.013058646,0.044943728,0.00022175485,0.00030338316,0.38127485,0.09814496,0.24189854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036304802,0.00025576932,0.25440413,0.0060454626,0.00022789894,0.039464924,0.21768607,0.00047343146,0.0006495788,0.21846327,0.26210195,0.00019121538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014427931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014701699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014427931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021108838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002642682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036758184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050071912","doi":"10.7202/043493ar","title":"Comportement criminel et régimes étatiques d'indemnisation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03602416594752122,"score_gpt":0.3283033278111929,"score_spread":0.2922791618636717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050071912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78225917,0.012314604,0.0034274894,0.017387105,0.00022375715,0.00016204346,0.0008144243,0.000034938774,0.18337645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754937,0.0039385376,0.0006528224,0.00090791343,0.00006146473,0.00009367801,0.00017074122,0.000010538294,0.018670544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622077,0.001157526,0.00012256141,0.00037993456,0.0012015734,0.00091769843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912833,0.0020861179,0.0029615266,0.00056664966,0.0021385013,0.00096386956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025974875,0.00029384787,0.00032443524,0.0022592722,0.003678065,0.002945549,0.0008670845,0.0012752874,0.008523009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010112158,0.00020728022,0.00027801294,0.0031779897,0.0046892385,0.0011747434,0.0009677938,0.0020735809,0.00033216982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032315016,0.00022327609,0.4469357,0.00067298627,0.00018776735,0.0009225871,0.05080512,0.0022531084,0.0018151083,0.30873775,0.015929189,0.1711942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034981163,0.0001491089,0.85041666,0.0009410285,0.00006858424,0.0006289147,0.024325464,0.0010331402,0.0009542392,0.007998853,0.11337565,0.00007344371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6830043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.788321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6830043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01520959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014970181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63772506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053793258","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.103.36495","title":"Alcohol Provider Liability in Canada and the United Kingdom: Legal and Cultural Influences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Law; Harm; Paternalism; Legal liability; Political science","score_opus":0.07425810013670905,"score_gpt":0.36264346837789413,"score_spread":0.2883853682411851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053793258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6511126,0.12893932,0.0005867609,0.10541479,0.00062083243,0.00015162311,0.0013957624,0.00003163135,0.111746736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965989,0.02190388,0.000311365,0.008125258,0.000077175624,0.000022692297,0.00020567766,0.000019189254,0.003345689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98402286,0.002526507,0.0011156389,0.00092183094,0.007517887,0.0038951358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223146,0.020869976,0.011845446,0.0010710356,0.034724195,0.009174841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007729454,0.00020259888,0.0005923626,0.0057954993,0.009762205,0.0069461763,0.0016666751,0.0020113478,0.0036539359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050731644,0.0004449628,0.00048767994,0.010489066,0.0070186383,0.0016178956,0.0029703674,0.0027108998,0.00017925394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051170273,0.00018498141,0.55965805,0.0016361718,0.00034059616,0.0027871425,0.0583799,0.0013222403,0.00055933115,0.16504805,0.07248393,0.1370879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006461233,0.000059246446,0.81174076,0.0025241275,0.00023014685,0.00083234406,0.047780726,0.0004076668,0.00042887765,0.0032629536,0.13249902,0.0001694073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99636465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12799495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12799495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14703725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92867273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054332008","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.419","title":"Réflexions sur la nomination des juges","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06543552130492349,"score_gpt":0.30749652842365005,"score_spread":0.24206100711872658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054332008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2168641,0.020756798,0.011032319,0.28608823,0.003645375,0.0004886596,0.0017044231,0.0001670819,0.459253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85764575,0.006298912,0.0031628292,0.019585075,0.0004483887,0.0002117085,0.00026762055,0.00009964311,0.112280026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816877,0.0063366676,0.0006077677,0.0016513785,0.0065837028,0.0031327987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603182,0.015381774,0.0022042335,0.0017185524,0.01797689,0.0024003305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025951812,0.0005206512,0.0007678366,0.0067270054,0.02123676,0.012549706,0.0025068019,0.0029691898,0.009521892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055195555,0.0005122518,0.0003318359,0.006726107,0.018860238,0.004015988,0.005465305,0.005545069,0.0009792392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011534599,0.000045173194,0.034571588,0.0006310149,0.00007538785,0.0014944407,0.33680522,0.00031026185,0.0009263225,0.36957973,0.17307304,0.082372405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024092222,0.000038398095,0.054207884,0.0023937896,0.000072492076,0.00035927445,0.2097196,0.00039394115,0.0012369993,0.023411972,0.70802015,0.00012135463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8528305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9269751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8528305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054523885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07026537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39560032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055128151","doi":"10.1108/13590790310808673","title":"Expectations of privacy and market abuse ‐ support for the Financial Services and Markets Act and the Canadian approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial services; Financial regulation; Financial market; Charter; Statutory law; Consumer Protection Act; Business; Tribunal; Market manipulation; Broker-dealer; Human rights; Finance; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030964251006508257,"score_gpt":0.2813038735430223,"score_spread":0.25033962253651404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055128151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018070938,0.0068798875,0.0026861723,0.5237673,0.0008988733,0.00008249567,0.00037991157,0.000039861614,0.44719458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8020061,0.0049103643,0.002614494,0.112966485,0.0006066389,0.00013457549,0.00016977123,0.000061717124,0.07652981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96423286,0.0063122013,0.0008599851,0.0016274377,0.019844996,0.0071224663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604643,0.015290349,0.0017184541,0.0015340607,0.016071446,0.0049212687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015132569,0.0005199849,0.00057085924,0.0023998157,0.02477664,0.016576955,0.0030650906,0.01770063,0.007862127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05845093,0.00055058696,0.00081544364,0.0026455189,0.036878295,0.006822436,0.005025116,0.012136794,0.00060863025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010165602,0.000007596886,0.0004828928,0.000017590131,0.00000342492,0.000075049116,0.0036063197,0.0001496518,0.00004074222,0.95996356,0.03153593,0.004107032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038986185,0.000028369763,0.0072932816,0.00074630085,0.00004266175,0.00024502288,0.013150864,0.0016642127,0.00036493578,0.31153286,0.6646781,0.00021443304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97934234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9775963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14131114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14131114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25992164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056126759","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.1.0181","title":"Relocating Officially Induced Error of Law: Fitting the Remedy to the Wrong","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Law; Jurisdiction; Ignorance; Supreme court; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Criminal law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13175978513366343,"score_gpt":0.4190385052998113,"score_spread":0.28727872016614786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056126759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08861848,0.0075514833,0.2765144,0.3738156,0.0062507764,0.0002946257,0.00009092173,0.00088993914,0.2459737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8939389,0.0031209548,0.039472096,0.04639027,0.0014624308,0.00020425183,0.00004621604,0.00023361377,0.015131274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95162493,0.021577299,0.0039768526,0.005025966,0.014691549,0.0031033168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9146846,0.040706936,0.009037644,0.020086467,0.01372397,0.0017603132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042405996,0.00050279207,0.0011056525,0.002960317,0.005866228,0.012915298,0.0043491162,0.019046387,0.0027301642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15437768,0.0007009015,0.0011151764,0.0014470476,0.03613413,0.015321065,0.010010125,0.014070293,0.00088253117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000210738,0.000081888145,0.0024667229,0.00015394685,0.0000311743,0.00042128513,0.0061308057,0.0005073328,0.00047974155,0.94402295,0.0075735827,0.038109336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094102346,0.00024064025,0.0023444667,0.0017659352,0.00010295398,0.0012761113,0.0070226034,0.0028018642,0.002857528,0.8680575,0.1133106,0.00012580342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00601883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008194177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042405996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034331505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020497734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.224267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056985910","doi":"10.7202/043086ar","title":"Que signifie l'expression « les corps politiques et les corporations » utilisée à l'article 33 du Code de procédure civile du Québec?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03739340103296268,"score_gpt":0.29966129218487564,"score_spread":0.26226789115191296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056985910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033053536,0.02370759,0.014686377,0.32302082,0.0027633272,0.00008087784,0.00040891458,0.00008803411,0.60219043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7680423,0.009183127,0.006979978,0.0433849,0.0007460996,0.00009947577,0.00012899814,0.00008428257,0.17135088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994052,0.0019799352,0.00016169035,0.00063897984,0.0019714267,0.0011960922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944319,0.0020022173,0.0005628995,0.00039083944,0.002276406,0.00033576894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052172123,0.00044481584,0.0005354648,0.0015339296,0.007130214,0.012511189,0.001081006,0.0052993535,0.0064813015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010461373,0.00037269117,0.00042330733,0.0016580059,0.026588285,0.0044753193,0.0016614341,0.0072053284,0.0008584707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010517934,0.0000068156023,0.0008895374,0.000077655815,0.000012850736,0.00010584332,0.0059813964,0.00007184853,0.00032003026,0.96317977,0.01827853,0.011065142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018986342,0.000029872755,0.012515677,0.0008294757,0.000057154786,0.00026865106,0.010783401,0.00042024878,0.0012315318,0.21253613,0.7611927,0.0001162326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7613765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86362517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2386235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031455085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04333171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4800576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057004394","doi":"10.7202/043949ar","title":"La Loi sur l’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels du Québec : lorsque le temps court contre les victimes de violence sexuelle intrafamiliale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013401634964813622,"score_gpt":0.24279831521288564,"score_spread":0.22939668024807203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057004394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6157584,0.011550216,0.002214503,0.12874806,0.0009078219,0.00022495157,0.0007144008,0.000043697375,0.23983803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768462,0.0036645504,0.0006818059,0.008662421,0.00011157658,0.000093976436,0.0001819423,0.000019734727,0.10973791],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758065,0.0005027517,0.00006065705,0.0001930234,0.0006536714,0.0010091389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957307,0.0006774125,0.00038430718,0.00012427926,0.001989518,0.0010936591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020039664,0.0002924142,0.000272355,0.0009088074,0.012562903,0.0036480213,0.0016191447,0.0022991782,0.012022135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006411675,0.00028620937,0.00030511612,0.0010880615,0.0050876755,0.0013351693,0.002058727,0.0035964688,0.0006066649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045360756,0.00032525483,0.2342676,0.0007052786,0.00012571133,0.0027884534,0.23740597,0.0018506136,0.0042860447,0.19600716,0.13905366,0.18273064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048585756,0.00022783884,0.48583034,0.0010442784,0.00011143526,0.00036077749,0.16517736,0.0008953157,0.0012150281,0.0042188177,0.3407124,0.00015781033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9881368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99519074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058568977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058568977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064841814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42494965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057183870","doi":"10.7202/043538ar","title":"La révision des règles spéciales d'administration de la preuve","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02636496158241898,"score_gpt":0.32574752364501014,"score_spread":0.2993825620625912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057183870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20396395,0.025200883,0.11837944,0.08949529,0.018678375,0.0072435183,0.0054779607,0.004639613,0.526921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3893385,0.008274609,0.12290379,0.024118543,0.0029240262,0.0033207044,0.0039443444,0.0009017506,0.4442738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618256,0.009266317,0.0053814156,0.0039514103,0.014274497,0.0053007486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8657596,0.031220024,0.009919991,0.014392623,0.07305447,0.005653289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041269988,0.00096236984,0.0010040016,0.007454664,0.0066007157,0.0076928874,0.0031891204,0.0050334358,0.010915581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09776616,0.0011351666,0.0021464394,0.0038474386,0.0061600674,0.003925938,0.0040319916,0.009559286,0.004560484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043408675,0.00040576176,0.025774576,0.0014154591,0.00015347243,0.0012189749,0.019349325,0.0025046926,0.010440451,0.42182034,0.1881922,0.32829067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049133767,0.00044402992,0.045965526,0.0013095218,0.00011270743,0.0007542126,0.0035171667,0.0008636689,0.0049875663,0.010550585,0.9312001,0.0002458247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21425527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23613742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21425527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020005306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06660068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42601633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057237494","doi":"10.7202/017309ar","title":"De la police au tribunal : formulation et cheminement des plaintes portées devant la Cour du Québec, Chambre criminelle et pénale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1994978769191604,"score_gpt":0.42084272755233465,"score_spread":0.22134485063317424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057237494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3361158,0.03739114,0.031940997,0.16450478,0.0027427205,0.0008014903,0.0004596347,0.00022058647,0.42582285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873666,0.008404045,0.01063841,0.0068668593,0.0005873668,0.00025066,0.00017517156,0.000063348074,0.09934815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946392,0.0022940075,0.00021868842,0.00034178558,0.001632554,0.0008737724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894274,0.0039107515,0.0011200687,0.0003993119,0.004429396,0.00071298535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056580063,0.00051645486,0.00039472684,0.0036890232,0.010838184,0.014491161,0.0014980957,0.002611008,0.0051959152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021762364,0.00047704924,0.0002978227,0.003162673,0.012283545,0.0028789942,0.0022481007,0.0036063795,0.0006323276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496656,0.000132384,0.029301662,0.00053478254,0.000051504267,0.0023495117,0.09635737,0.001449764,0.0017735044,0.5901909,0.057515085,0.22024852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046841596,0.00016311431,0.12127385,0.0015291021,0.00006347539,0.0010976909,0.14900279,0.0052970923,0.0033208127,0.052633412,0.6653904,0.00018155132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6665869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7682166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33341312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026456954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04220387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6707533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057407474","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9035-7","title":"Strict Confidentiality: An Alternative to Pre’s “Limited Confidentiality” Doctrine","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Privilege (computing); Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.1493687211564676,"score_gpt":0.47922510962706605,"score_spread":0.32985638847059845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057407474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051538736,0.002714923,0.18432248,0.12950574,0.002237959,0.00023751378,0.00016986669,0.00014876251,0.629124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9184446,0.0006375584,0.02701462,0.023217428,0.0014435138,0.0004158471,0.000046627443,0.00007718133,0.028702697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735684,0.011687476,0.001796795,0.0033045993,0.0073707774,0.0022720054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95998776,0.02268324,0.0024549037,0.009282822,0.004475577,0.0011156108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020085352,0.0004801931,0.001090669,0.0015346885,0.0057136603,0.008069037,0.0033912756,0.013617133,0.007375088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055763453,0.000963233,0.0014906852,0.0013139516,0.028148461,0.015177235,0.0071322294,0.016381044,0.0013101939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044949,0.0000061925357,0.00006685566,0.000014378166,0.0000045705856,0.000036125584,0.00043691494,0.000059267844,0.00011686285,0.9956291,0.0013838139,0.002235565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027387694,0.000026668456,0.00022372583,0.000085403786,0.00002182103,0.00021622857,0.00025354986,0.0005835499,0.0005745472,0.9806669,0.017292662,0.000027590313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028628963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034143669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020085352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037647197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007937983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10622275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059544678","doi":"10.7202/044140ar","title":"Les étapes de la mobilisation citoyenne et de l’adoption de la loi contre les poursuites-baîllons","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Publics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.012977436322820531,"score_gpt":0.310937301493129,"score_spread":0.2979598651703084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059544678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43808547,0.0024135227,0.0098894425,0.07727489,0.0012860561,0.0005580514,0.00018511536,0.00015579925,0.4701517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78003675,0.0007062602,0.002434383,0.00966958,0.00013250015,0.00033124976,0.00009175873,0.000108522734,0.20648903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865703,0.0048576016,0.0003212127,0.0011999677,0.0032348775,0.0038159853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887249,0.003862508,0.00081678224,0.00081494835,0.004012143,0.0017687292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011965353,0.00039162437,0.0004355722,0.0014901359,0.020521075,0.010209367,0.0017375165,0.0049755396,0.009300979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01591689,0.0005276026,0.00056076446,0.00158957,0.019736063,0.0034795066,0.0074631786,0.008954049,0.0012717993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009141143,0.000101935584,0.009121132,0.00028772376,0.000026036829,0.0011667758,0.56692713,0.00035298974,0.0033194458,0.34354654,0.027983783,0.047075044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028966117,0.00012998017,0.026767,0.0006788375,0.000026345393,0.00020973526,0.22366108,0.00033332233,0.0014174253,0.007734033,0.73886937,0.0001438763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48604107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66212445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51395893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036491133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059650473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.966424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059839979","doi":"10.7202/039343ar","title":"Les sanctions administratives de l’assurance-emploi : entre solidarité, assurance et répression","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02412077641497012,"score_gpt":0.3255428210238179,"score_spread":0.30142204460884775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059839979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40354687,0.0253554,0.016219646,0.07510763,0.0004059872,0.000074377494,0.0004287335,0.00013020149,0.47873116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98432064,0.0029569997,0.0010567658,0.0010408887,0.000146079,0.000027055832,0.000049686845,0.00002439726,0.010377585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946407,0.0020549963,0.00025662355,0.00062082533,0.0015579633,0.00086885033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837841,0.009123094,0.0033894419,0.001332597,0.0017592981,0.0006115229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062987567,0.00026783423,0.0003873513,0.0029158138,0.005055768,0.008901556,0.0010056688,0.0025195887,0.005331611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019650372,0.00033323496,0.00036020816,0.0028800387,0.019205913,0.005129814,0.0027502247,0.0050670826,0.0004391372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003322133,0.000024967221,0.006419015,0.00008500209,0.000012051239,0.00009839298,0.011553318,0.0003603627,0.00027423524,0.954675,0.0021248336,0.024339572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058155234,0.00023791993,0.13917384,0.002382729,0.000118812284,0.0006331521,0.022434333,0.0023601227,0.0032107048,0.33434832,0.49478865,0.00025334148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050423637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07569156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050423637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010964762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008784671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10026026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060872817","doi":"10.7202/1022313ar","title":"La relativité aquilienne en droit de la responsabilité civile — analyse comparée des systèmes germanique, canadien et québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018883796378657232,"score_gpt":0.30866635993821934,"score_spread":0.2897825635595621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060872817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37793744,0.0041753515,0.0045767566,0.008352288,0.00007290551,0.00009223716,0.00081507576,0.00005568364,0.6039223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97504276,0.0010230679,0.0006892023,0.0003104349,0.000009149266,0.000026524469,0.00020312933,0.00002444229,0.022671213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830294,0.00037460832,0.00003868834,0.00018372403,0.0004927033,0.0006073461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822134,0.00038868806,0.00020472951,0.00015295352,0.00082814455,0.00020418198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015550333,0.0003602765,0.00039236856,0.003766206,0.004715332,0.006125541,0.0009005033,0.0008031027,0.011639915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033158092,0.00026525685,0.00042628488,0.00604504,0.009200059,0.002500902,0.0019708541,0.0013743037,0.00043964278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002552569,0.00001199724,0.015500795,0.00010943313,0.000044696175,0.00013590824,0.023608599,0.0012207084,0.00040464383,0.94145036,0.0052579404,0.012229286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003781304,0.000057255806,0.28319174,0.0008617414,0.0001794224,0.00021733873,0.12635225,0.0062358626,0.0010997267,0.11575374,0.4658511,0.00016204672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9536281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07952643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07952643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028665842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57700735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061777057","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.75","title":"Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: <i>Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial discretion; Criminal code; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Terrorism; Penal code; Code (set theory); Judicial activism; Criminal law; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08279000444014531,"score_gpt":0.33144560875058204,"score_spread":0.24865560431043673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061777057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07920517,0.009139593,0.0027315554,0.6661624,0.0033455081,0.00038988562,0.001467084,0.00019003166,0.23736884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5426208,0.00652406,0.005348168,0.3094667,0.001670246,0.00021226474,0.0005167504,0.000143942,0.13349718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97685975,0.001516748,0.0007059146,0.0011119934,0.009686967,0.010118633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794118,0.006761205,0.0014538509,0.0005626989,0.0090051135,0.0028053923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008334304,0.000643283,0.0008871441,0.0024378095,0.03070535,0.012771933,0.0054718093,0.025203854,0.006061781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027957896,0.0011977827,0.0017344325,0.0028910225,0.013137132,0.00310974,0.0035077995,0.018123986,0.00067380315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017218848,0.00015234402,0.012699662,0.0002872423,0.00013163168,0.0012313644,0.012970428,0.0013419711,0.0016414357,0.4665549,0.47087437,0.0319423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003696373,0.00015371582,0.12556913,0.0012865682,0.00071180385,0.00048532797,0.018910756,0.0041102944,0.005938783,0.05537335,0.78628695,0.0008036648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99795306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87651014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12348985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38927758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8959858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062148457","doi":"10.7202/043178ar","title":"Les pouvoirs d'urgence et le partage des compétences au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026555385334901177,"score_gpt":0.2819153873778359,"score_spread":0.25536000204293474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062148457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40926975,0.0044330955,0.009208615,0.023009116,0.0001604782,0.00010259935,0.0004205181,0.00007409516,0.55332166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664343,0.0011566879,0.00064331683,0.0006005406,0.0000123365435,0.000017837145,0.000036183672,0.000011399279,0.0310875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973471,0.0003979451,0.000047467023,0.00026579003,0.00077248574,0.0011692599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972868,0.000706599,0.0002457691,0.00012503029,0.0008313064,0.0008045696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015414349,0.0003348291,0.00041024445,0.0014935561,0.011025746,0.0060130763,0.0012435184,0.0014069055,0.009518016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00498797,0.00029464232,0.00037240528,0.0020382875,0.010448897,0.0019393103,0.0031923254,0.0024643242,0.00025553067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003077339,0.000022171202,0.009487694,0.00006784213,0.000022829858,0.0002111921,0.0208507,0.0014111003,0.0002561173,0.9420566,0.004409306,0.021173714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007746354,0.000082243765,0.145853,0.0010183444,0.00013835247,0.00033628993,0.09445154,0.0064160093,0.0009363632,0.28611565,0.46429422,0.00028051113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98914087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09141291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09141291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12862301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435280","doi":"10.7202/043546ar","title":"Quelques réflexions sur l'ordre public dans le droit processuel québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020585579097319038,"score_gpt":0.2679840251846288,"score_spread":0.2473984460873098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062435280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09107026,0.012868373,0.017056338,0.2240784,0.0011965669,0.00009072238,0.00038293877,0.0001264712,0.65312994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518794,0.0037107246,0.002970402,0.0107328575,0.0002734872,0.00006676218,0.0000957326,0.000102765654,0.13016783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411726,0.0019961395,0.00013279282,0.0007480895,0.0017173912,0.0012881871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942386,0.0027913572,0.0003839967,0.0004263319,0.0017087813,0.00045096903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062441495,0.0005064906,0.0004330121,0.0027018546,0.016930256,0.016387353,0.001721727,0.005935462,0.014654026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009708925,0.00047072564,0.0005918,0.0030986539,0.028856365,0.00829785,0.0037345188,0.0078378655,0.0006355243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012360227,0.000008122517,0.0008735628,0.000043394662,0.0000070036035,0.00010632419,0.01942867,0.0001450073,0.00012951375,0.96180034,0.008833857,0.008611823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002978718,0.00003556769,0.013135673,0.0009957309,0.00006498354,0.00022629566,0.054648712,0.0009780696,0.00093639106,0.2283435,0.7004854,0.00011986387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8359932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8956279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16400683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057636995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044430267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41818762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062874933","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.4.745","title":"The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02086310994059187,"score_gpt":0.30752740761552744,"score_spread":0.28666429767493556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062874933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015658882,0.024522973,0.0007952641,0.65926546,0.0071050175,0.000102742175,0.00039332028,0.000035967932,0.29212028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36328024,0.015009646,0.0013333162,0.4329431,0.005827383,0.00019006594,0.0001946835,0.00022178216,0.18099982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98415273,0.0018734945,0.0004194994,0.0011495277,0.006311341,0.006093299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97765315,0.011075064,0.00042729193,0.00057313294,0.007631671,0.0026397672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01227339,0.0010926161,0.0016428479,0.004771025,0.047149803,0.027957851,0.0047381697,0.045491114,0.0077267885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03542311,0.0013217172,0.0014256361,0.006085864,0.033034395,0.0063565583,0.0059911706,0.03509316,0.00086451933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054189968,0.000030968287,0.0005139774,0.00008698757,0.000043280303,0.00025079396,0.00890873,0.00032934526,0.000164917,0.6176968,0.36426824,0.007651813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008312076,0.0000143979305,0.0031648092,0.0007665744,0.00010338067,0.00007597041,0.010255748,0.00033294185,0.00037997562,0.08504258,0.89959717,0.00018339179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98637146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14323182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14323182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18708067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99372965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063111682","doi":"10.7202/043703ar","title":"Le principe de précaution et la déférence judiciaire en droit administratif","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01321010353606324,"score_gpt":0.30241347126463053,"score_spread":0.2892033677285673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063111682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04014958,0.012052984,0.054718647,0.07626287,0.0010227888,0.00017055163,0.00021657738,0.00012959613,0.8152764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85187775,0.006930169,0.014967701,0.013289267,0.00080804894,0.00021018503,0.00007612557,0.000081635386,0.11175914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918425,0.002438162,0.00025370662,0.00083312235,0.0031715517,0.0014608629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954947,0.0018755188,0.0006254657,0.0004898251,0.0012042476,0.00031013924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047994354,0.0006502499,0.00052828674,0.001423721,0.006243466,0.009867553,0.0016015833,0.0051564886,0.006478588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079442,0.0004242059,0.0008310692,0.0012679802,0.02031292,0.003288311,0.0035459728,0.006625861,0.0008520721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050241756,0.0000065112727,0.00040751815,0.00002443103,0.0000051542806,0.000060213944,0.0016751622,0.00030678773,0.00006489059,0.9926335,0.0018575924,0.0029531538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035714915,0.00006557186,0.006478606,0.0004793272,0.000040416846,0.00032181427,0.0036519517,0.0014732319,0.0008625603,0.7016303,0.2848877,0.00007282085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18105315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18000682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18105315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01725019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02477635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35999864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063398290","doi":"10.7202/042614ar","title":"Property Rights, Municipal Corporations and Judicial Review","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Commission; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032313444052459346,"score_gpt":0.29544131148331726,"score_spread":0.2631278674308579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063398290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038197756,0.15181729,0.0051266067,0.123199016,0.0021997048,0.00016174479,0.000219412,0.000093322255,0.6789851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7756507,0.051221337,0.0016155324,0.01835922,0.003579647,0.00018414944,0.00019397505,0.00006658247,0.1491288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829554,0.007284754,0.0010295591,0.0016802755,0.0043752524,0.00267475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97109175,0.017672466,0.0029540795,0.002053801,0.0051028896,0.0011251288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015389088,0.00026621454,0.0006974413,0.0031602983,0.006666203,0.012467641,0.0018381666,0.006990291,0.0086857565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037932985,0.0004022478,0.0005688334,0.004210591,0.012576982,0.0053573013,0.0045314548,0.0050838925,0.0011196684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009214029,0.000016707954,0.0008486472,0.000100507146,0.000012040946,0.00016781676,0.0013563304,0.0002740227,0.00004877602,0.95132685,0.026791263,0.019047776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003591462,0.00003089875,0.0046640667,0.0008948682,0.000037587553,0.0002163852,0.0023449033,0.000703194,0.0002939153,0.27760628,0.71312606,0.000045928933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03858417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045310557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03858417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0133648785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021906719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096969426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063433766","doi":"10.7202/1006430ar","title":"Renouveau doctrinal en droit de la prescription","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Medical prescription; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.0210364861292437,"score_gpt":0.27310969907533683,"score_spread":0.25207321294609314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063433766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08787452,0.029901693,0.023171443,0.37075797,0.0036881235,0.00020833744,0.00046010932,0.00018365536,0.48375425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79658204,0.008533497,0.009154679,0.08514159,0.0015107497,0.00017307463,0.00014476878,0.00012063259,0.098638974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97457075,0.008129263,0.001376371,0.0022350764,0.011525132,0.0021634714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715622,0.013255935,0.0016242471,0.0027240012,0.009563219,0.0012704488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018765263,0.00035879735,0.00076616026,0.0015606112,0.009574269,0.010687489,0.0024000038,0.008353349,0.0045762137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026592072,0.0004931556,0.00069420587,0.0015122247,0.01945807,0.003950995,0.0035959578,0.015506143,0.0008245698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048365084,0.00003371485,0.0019192415,0.00016833631,0.000022275122,0.00022671469,0.011590194,0.00022598723,0.0011092839,0.93963253,0.024486316,0.020537104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055889355,0.000144207,0.011600838,0.0015868287,0.00007510341,0.00036686863,0.009234831,0.001023433,0.002929746,0.08634711,0.8864686,0.00016650253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22849539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35379463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22849539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024667686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041402157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4543308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064347324","doi":"10.7202/1005846ar","title":"Le bijuridisme canadien à la croisée des chemins ? Réflexions sur l’incidence de l’article 8.1 de la Loi d’interprétation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03711378500389355,"score_gpt":0.296828824594426,"score_spread":0.25971503959053244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064347324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045789924,0.020861652,0.012814199,0.29021153,0.0025963122,0.00008291991,0.0002384292,0.000064231004,0.62734073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7500579,0.014158535,0.0054046176,0.04286299,0.0011968749,0.00013079704,0.00011440309,0.00015465738,0.18591928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884058,0.0046234215,0.00024906118,0.0013205275,0.003636781,0.0017644728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806447,0.0051531377,0.00079530245,0.0008497165,0.0043723704,0.00076502014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008768762,0.00047135967,0.0006125669,0.0020497697,0.012366347,0.015142194,0.0021723,0.0056475075,0.012441782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01869362,0.00037798964,0.0005373719,0.0025883964,0.036228947,0.0054229917,0.0036953785,0.009320948,0.0009950512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018069586,0.0000099248,0.0010915314,0.00007240302,0.000008486849,0.00010127516,0.017079195,0.00011881395,0.00008368459,0.95738214,0.014821154,0.009213385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021392652,0.0000291244,0.0060921567,0.0010710694,0.000045202807,0.0001609712,0.04153288,0.0007419506,0.00093987153,0.22104155,0.72824043,0.000083298306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5849852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6920734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038552828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052932832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8349178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064674822","doi":"10.7202/1027456ar","title":"La responsabilité versant acteurs : vers une redécouverte, en droit canadien,de la notion d’imputabilité","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.010509105521225165,"score_gpt":0.2629681914218199,"score_spread":0.25245908590059474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064674822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03414855,0.008411516,0.017177084,0.035969757,0.0007267896,0.000037416932,0.00008486474,0.000077872326,0.903366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789003,0.00396819,0.0035489136,0.005086016,0.00037949398,0.00010539504,0.00005957552,0.00013571091,0.1977137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99212074,0.003837174,0.00018846236,0.0010896624,0.0016915026,0.0010724778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568474,0.0016854699,0.00042128927,0.0008026936,0.000807594,0.00059829955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005504806,0.0008615359,0.0005181815,0.0019307294,0.008540744,0.013214121,0.0018935086,0.0051393355,0.010239121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006398386,0.00051029073,0.00069310423,0.0014957673,0.044911183,0.008848969,0.007911613,0.009678659,0.002156366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004858698,0.0000032844068,0.00014902443,0.000012736157,0.0000024361545,0.00003459383,0.006727806,0.000036159723,0.000044483622,0.9898657,0.0010171849,0.0021016295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017396327,0.00003540643,0.0012395568,0.0003539041,0.000026160122,0.00027990833,0.010779074,0.00026151005,0.0005223564,0.45355362,0.53288287,0.000048216607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033934593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03648955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009145116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011433237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06747413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064988402","doi":"10.7202/043500ar","title":"Have the Politics of Rate Regulation Produced a Better No-Fault Regime for Ontario ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Subsidy; Compromise; Compensation (psychology); Politics; Certainty; Tort; Business; Interest rate; Damages; Subrogation; Actuarial science; Economics; Public economics; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Political science; Market economy; Liability","score_opus":0.020944479956417718,"score_gpt":0.27788931857695803,"score_spread":0.2569448386205403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064988402","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08286253,0.0065631163,0.0022227883,0.7506521,0.0012809861,0.000090513095,0.0008084365,0.00009729604,0.1554223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81694573,0.006025911,0.0039394978,0.06553816,0.0009367269,0.00006638142,0.00033250876,0.00010157787,0.106113456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895068,0.00116626,0.00030397004,0.0005775835,0.005406244,0.003039128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801602,0.002427538,0.002307986,0.0009730023,0.010590443,0.0035408395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008090488,0.00024639207,0.00048632096,0.0011915297,0.009141794,0.0070699183,0.0019292599,0.0044608093,0.0090480745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026359625,0.00047507999,0.0005718297,0.0016136335,0.010730191,0.0038727596,0.0018688864,0.0035538462,0.00086915906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022594222,0.000073008705,0.04396124,0.00066706276,0.00009581989,0.00073422305,0.011081676,0.0009682478,0.0018188094,0.7179427,0.15202901,0.070402175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015294115,0.00009737184,0.09027792,0.00059753784,0.00009442005,0.00020957737,0.010358148,0.0011401203,0.0011756655,0.04312207,0.85249865,0.00027553915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9715569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8347692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1652308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17358774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.968214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066039189","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.219","title":"Introduction: The Youth Criminal Justice Act - A New Era in Canadian Juvenile Justice?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Juvenile delinquency; Law; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.09502680670693506,"score_gpt":0.320603496681848,"score_spread":0.22557668997491295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066039189","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011678244,0.115755185,0.0006423901,0.2885043,0.37169316,0.00026715492,0.0043750023,0.00023676132,0.21735822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033331,0.1308824,0.0012631224,0.20386527,0.21727093,0.0003732216,0.0032864343,0.00046803063,0.40925974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995069,0.00040503862,0.0002018766,0.0005258345,0.0029750802,0.000823134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896116,0.0011321437,0.00036676612,0.00022347011,0.007379562,0.0012864104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028401967,0.0017767273,0.0010137651,0.0044239173,0.01143818,0.010724366,0.003268282,0.009198547,0.030986626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007605643,0.00062677515,0.00097190525,0.0054627345,0.0049966173,0.0033252668,0.0023245378,0.0061560343,0.006904489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009406331,0.000012621801,0.0001978457,0.00016212318,0.0000020419589,0.000044014098,0.00046886405,0.00004273624,0.00004639015,0.008870001,0.97792345,0.012220521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019720417,0.0000060961884,0.0016619922,0.00027969354,0.0000029997207,0.000019680445,0.00033674174,0.000028527895,0.000012235855,0.0006547742,0.99698156,0.000013710396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85086626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8951461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14913374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05132264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053162437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37237358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068868265","doi":"10.7202/1006421ar","title":"The Effect of Alcohol on the Canadian Constitution ... Seriously","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Separation of powers; Political science; Dominion; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06841505137502493,"score_gpt":0.30564085008465974,"score_spread":0.2372257987096348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068868265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02421696,0.013853304,0.00064322556,0.43637586,0.004276241,0.00007803818,0.0012672567,0.00008475036,0.5192043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53419393,0.016797245,0.0018316775,0.19392957,0.0021716193,0.00008102437,0.00057099963,0.00020414322,0.2502197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961276,0.0007724815,0.00014901208,0.00063071103,0.0054774475,0.0033575888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908743,0.0014875605,0.00025580276,0.00030800665,0.005769411,0.0013049039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003891548,0.0005191935,0.00046868555,0.0023787143,0.032041304,0.008849483,0.0017325059,0.005513793,0.012757668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015699597,0.00048910803,0.0007244491,0.002515338,0.014852064,0.0025602449,0.0031208154,0.008326907,0.0010275558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008086388,0.000026993945,0.005226612,0.00009236081,0.000039570867,0.00029945374,0.006136551,0.00033257584,0.0004910284,0.5539655,0.39125752,0.04205091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046852405,0.000028941336,0.020145815,0.00026468822,0.000095233605,0.000073720636,0.0041307257,0.00026042757,0.0005644961,0.01801694,0.956225,0.00014716516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12999512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12999512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20013371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94318503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069410744","doi":"10.7202/042688ar","title":"Quelques réflexions à propos du document de la C.R.D. traitant de l'homicide","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminology; Diminished responsibility; Criminalization; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.009001181274722665,"score_gpt":0.29225924377208995,"score_spread":0.2832580624973673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069410744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005972535,0.119239,0.0022880475,0.63844347,0.05835533,0.00010699054,0.0005155009,0.00021204764,0.17486708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13658035,0.090625614,0.0030552412,0.31980947,0.028255973,0.00015028153,0.00031445728,0.00025259596,0.42095602],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921793,0.0015702521,0.00040124016,0.0008737036,0.0039427206,0.0010328095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406946,0.0014965824,0.00024068076,0.00028650567,0.0034563022,0.0004504943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004296266,0.0007431474,0.0007304637,0.0018988224,0.006155375,0.009985257,0.0025255338,0.008229592,0.006376657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010724735,0.00038774125,0.00083426357,0.0014038179,0.01024174,0.002267034,0.0014586583,0.012435668,0.0019997682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047849433,0.0000393969,0.0010725082,0.000375775,0.00003316647,0.0010278752,0.003979276,0.00023603279,0.00082372973,0.27462035,0.6691358,0.04860829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005029407,0.000009310288,0.0006670788,0.00023755131,0.000010604926,0.00021385583,0.00057696406,0.000052237818,0.00026108202,0.0014477145,0.99650073,0.000017858858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78101957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79750514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78101957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03789385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04088834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44054008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070685751","doi":"10.7202/042598ar","title":"An Evaluation of Canada's Dangerous Offender Legislation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0363514379358066,"score_gpt":0.30549191829958433,"score_spread":0.26914048036377775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070685751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4010492,0.00590788,0.0012272779,0.026560543,0.00069678854,0.0009447313,0.008191561,0.00031675497,0.5551052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474992,0.0050117355,0.0026460085,0.008149689,0.00012040727,0.00033209735,0.0034932075,0.000102589256,0.13264515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97906417,0.0013225332,0.00035532753,0.0006775427,0.015053259,0.003527287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725993,0.0034192728,0.0008371321,0.000405534,0.020660672,0.0020780235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005205169,0.0004357147,0.00046900223,0.0076457323,0.012740395,0.0071926946,0.0021098645,0.0018213487,0.0073245047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01710498,0.00042336888,0.00070423516,0.009600802,0.002738201,0.0010731259,0.0015680133,0.0018941513,0.0005485221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000827213,0.0008704923,0.1694346,0.0015408694,0.0002120451,0.0012696016,0.01996253,0.008211119,0.0033688915,0.275111,0.26539794,0.25379372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001636033,0.00049018563,0.44034442,0.00066610525,0.00023692324,0.00015120329,0.027088003,0.0035465104,0.0023835409,0.002543747,0.52217907,0.00020673033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99725705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78138995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21861008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32586208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90630156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071163636","doi":"10.7202/043499ar","title":"Comparer l'incomparable : les indemnités pour préjudice corporel en droit commun et dans la Loi sur l'assurance automobile","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02220570719202869,"score_gpt":0.29247877817813067,"score_spread":0.270273070986102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071163636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67230135,0.004261401,0.0051543196,0.009425303,0.00043365176,0.00006223589,0.00010046305,0.000040697294,0.30822054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542471,0.0010273514,0.0008750631,0.0016169567,0.00011045604,0.00004882269,0.000035578356,0.00002766755,0.042010993],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703825,0.0010944395,0.00006948881,0.00036522935,0.0009388686,0.00049368053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.0011170256,0.00058733864,0.00026817105,0.0006741308,0.00030047886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016368865,0.00047120376,0.00041151588,0.0019750483,0.006824627,0.005430308,0.00091022556,0.0018274795,0.012819873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007075146,0.00018168209,0.00036712186,0.0011988585,0.010180536,0.0030280636,0.0041026655,0.0031618264,0.0009089654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014461174,0.00013110213,0.062088616,0.00024805058,0.0000831123,0.0012503953,0.45519736,0.00026145726,0.003394852,0.3994957,0.0066654123,0.071039364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017187367,0.000265147,0.2814667,0.00083549775,0.000097953685,0.0017218754,0.3929916,0.0005916858,0.0029184897,0.044366606,0.27460158,0.00012563405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033059545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04094184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033059545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031920872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020291575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06573421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071775082","doi":"10.1353/dss.2006.0020","title":"New Orleans: A Right to Return?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dissent","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decadence; Tragedy (event); Jazz; Nothing; Taste; Romance; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art history; Media studies; History; Art; Law; Economic history; Sociology; Political science; Business; Literature; Archaeology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0180871052801209,"score_gpt":0.32482941867035287,"score_spread":0.30674231339023195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071775082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009597364,0.016489431,0.0003346381,0.7610993,0.011769341,0.000018769197,0.0001108923,0.00005059821,0.20052966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11917954,0.014943934,0.00045071635,0.4628363,0.0036897548,0.000060908562,0.0001513201,0.00011791802,0.39856967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649495,0.0011038994,0.000112292,0.000396331,0.0007378522,0.0011548153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541336,0.0008174384,0.00023454234,0.00031191486,0.0007935236,0.0024291899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004541143,0.00037648264,0.000596245,0.00058631226,0.01345244,0.0128477905,0.0014066731,0.008305117,0.052502483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013480858,0.00025726703,0.00035840043,0.0005393105,0.0118643455,0.010011042,0.008179236,0.013228939,0.0088159535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057285728,0.000072491464,0.002101211,0.00012180997,0.000012546199,0.0008319677,0.011000511,0.00003077416,0.00016792776,0.1427058,0.7859359,0.056961756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005418828,0.000014271796,0.00069374003,0.00031535485,0.0000031986551,0.00031627857,0.01697976,0.000009924921,0.00003886242,0.0067810593,0.9748253,0.000016709006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046618856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12570432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052502483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004387562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01420643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17563832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072229252","doi":"10.7202/042903ar","title":"La suprématie législative et l'édiction d'une charte des droits britannique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Discretion; Parliament; Democracy; State (computer science); Fundamental rights; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.016804810231648138,"score_gpt":0.3035003632217261,"score_spread":0.28669555299007793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072229252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09421083,0.015616612,0.006621632,0.056520957,0.0018508668,0.000114303126,0.0007571977,0.00016454376,0.8241431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8253642,0.0056858975,0.0053079803,0.004163283,0.00036120418,0.00013245485,0.00023928,0.000060403232,0.15868531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310356,0.001985614,0.0003125384,0.00055999524,0.0032595803,0.0007786565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918173,0.0043045585,0.00075790874,0.0006990964,0.0021043455,0.00031685946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006071022,0.00032573382,0.0002919309,0.001773888,0.005312185,0.009233837,0.000743253,0.002580838,0.009390701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013388087,0.00043858873,0.0002698733,0.0017815239,0.012284367,0.0019978627,0.0016343481,0.0049015805,0.0008957155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026713027,0.000011832341,0.00086471386,0.000095178635,0.000004552421,0.00009491125,0.004380374,0.00034050862,0.00034748192,0.9668636,0.013779269,0.013190883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025123269,0.000047312424,0.017722331,0.0005359387,0.000026881995,0.00020468664,0.0030637172,0.000765043,0.0012674514,0.041393094,0.9348406,0.000107721964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34824306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42868116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34824306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014212107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019356694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073000845","doi":"10.3917/risa.734.0583","title":"L'externalisation et la circulation transfrontalière des données : Défi de la protection des renseignements personnels dans le cadre du USA Patriot Act","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Patriot Act; Philosophy; Law; Terrorism","score_opus":0.12486225678482331,"score_gpt":0.3695824317176572,"score_spread":0.24472017493283388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073000845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3360055,0.006481156,0.016616916,0.24283358,0.0008052813,0.0007754868,0.001715948,0.00055698684,0.39420915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92935777,0.0030165638,0.006798768,0.013908898,0.00037068204,0.0003275706,0.0005161308,0.00017345259,0.04553016],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9243853,0.030633517,0.0046513556,0.0037666534,0.031067327,0.005495835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73567456,0.1335466,0.028980855,0.017715724,0.07489877,0.009183543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041392323,0.00033992634,0.0004957235,0.0051251925,0.008029438,0.018430373,0.002260173,0.00320266,0.012871894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16761819,0.00068753824,0.0005933422,0.005655337,0.012874281,0.0053754533,0.007381894,0.0042703976,0.0016706095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000430213,0.00019497177,0.1938459,0.00097194297,0.00020718781,0.0033197887,0.18041596,0.0015992022,0.0035660996,0.23994486,0.096531786,0.2789721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007874058,0.00017295963,0.18152244,0.0035873116,0.00014610696,0.0020316385,0.08909526,0.0028005263,0.0023942273,0.019569596,0.6983652,0.00023597147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51872176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44339943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51872176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035401657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098774254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9682252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073823109","doi":"10.7202/042587ar","title":"L'article 7 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés et les principes de justice fondamentale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Cooley's Anemia Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.015575405766083607,"score_gpt":0.30552887588733485,"score_spread":0.2899534701212512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073823109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058220965,0.018545097,0.014932103,0.06526755,0.0050660805,0.00022588857,0.0010167162,0.00019538606,0.8889291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2644519,0.020664828,0.026841555,0.06649603,0.003269399,0.0007665969,0.0012788341,0.00030022283,0.61593074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98915684,0.0014505556,0.0002960885,0.00074244005,0.006260018,0.0020940856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550337,0.001793394,0.0002637158,0.0003119755,0.0017826963,0.00034492914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004933821,0.0008426174,0.00094785204,0.0026745345,0.0071968464,0.013155826,0.0019434958,0.007942295,0.012069599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009258517,0.0006099795,0.0015512296,0.0021110103,0.014777811,0.0027147855,0.0022666242,0.011132712,0.0022437251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005917901,0.0000048911447,0.000120358076,0.00004904431,0.000004619449,0.0000450487,0.0008939,0.00010612975,0.0001048677,0.96105653,0.032492977,0.00511571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009730368,0.00001324426,0.0013685225,0.0003045358,0.000012886882,0.00012958208,0.00067652774,0.00017079584,0.00042379307,0.11301314,0.8838291,0.000048079255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7014694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7636274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96929187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030708136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05161584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60057735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073964868","doi":"10.7202/1013007ar","title":"Qu’est-ce qu’un « délit d’opinion » ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028002657842859234,"score_gpt":0.2975306206767695,"score_spread":0.2695279628339103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073964868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05617961,0.0073605543,0.021527734,0.15197454,0.0017745609,0.000036135625,0.00020950158,0.00007065761,0.76086664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903536,0.0027032923,0.0026256475,0.013941391,0.0008009422,0.000059520768,0.00010344753,0.00010038466,0.08931174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931179,0.0026847036,0.00023206999,0.0012691374,0.0015047569,0.0011915033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995395,0.0012544778,0.00048783093,0.00041867618,0.0020919999,0.00035198018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058148415,0.000428691,0.0004972969,0.0008696889,0.0069876937,0.011416573,0.0011265852,0.0036454534,0.00906613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008310762,0.00023634122,0.0004556993,0.0010043196,0.021665856,0.010006955,0.0028042544,0.0053225025,0.002495518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024040859,0.000005881288,0.00060402736,0.000052081905,0.000008201009,0.00007684027,0.008503723,0.000045680223,0.00028783476,0.97747517,0.005821913,0.0070947064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003250492,0.000051541832,0.0029502255,0.00043828276,0.00003608072,0.00026571078,0.028127754,0.00045331364,0.0010974115,0.3942896,0.57219774,0.00005984154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042144775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036671337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042144775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009826867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079109175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083798945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073992155","doi":"10.7202/043506ar","title":"L'assurance des dommages matériels au Québec et l'indemnisation directe : un régime efficace mais encore mal compris","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01853242257965677,"score_gpt":0.274912258945123,"score_spread":0.25637983636546624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073992155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386847,0.0051783733,0.015563168,0.028528176,0.0003793651,0.00026782468,0.0007439759,0.00038910663,0.41026524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447676,0.0011703344,0.0030571562,0.0014921664,0.000057694284,0.00006991976,0.00012245837,0.0000301222,0.14923252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978834,0.00024007657,0.000058478032,0.00028617284,0.0009586172,0.00057312904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690706,0.0004448541,0.00042112076,0.00023255654,0.0016432666,0.00035117636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011830302,0.00039520487,0.00020912502,0.0009914072,0.0052888296,0.0034770211,0.0009252262,0.0017761025,0.011937329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042336974,0.00026866337,0.0003302925,0.0008234724,0.0039328923,0.0010745995,0.0014969291,0.001742005,0.0007004901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002339063,0.00026452748,0.111642584,0.0005533574,0.000120036166,0.0013257882,0.052863285,0.005179562,0.018648233,0.47756886,0.047844816,0.28375503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004782239,0.00033160223,0.31019247,0.00052549574,0.00013242988,0.00043517703,0.01423767,0.0035879926,0.00775148,0.012894409,0.6496382,0.00022539932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95672655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97240734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04327345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03220559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039182153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23366898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076154020","doi":"10.7202/042412ar","title":"La preuve devant les tribunaux administratifs et quasi judiciaires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Statute; Natural justice; Tribunal; Law; Economic Justice; Administrative law; Criticism; Political science; Administration of justice; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.027478048736962583,"score_gpt":0.3294220962261428,"score_spread":0.30194404748918025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076154020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11069557,0.04367474,0.115318865,0.22293413,0.004873715,0.0005390486,0.00086110935,0.00046365862,0.5006392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7862607,0.008504123,0.027779773,0.017711129,0.0022029479,0.00039982266,0.0002501931,0.00016604215,0.15672532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978781,0.008223058,0.00092231395,0.0025167468,0.007187412,0.00236947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97016454,0.017405098,0.0019278674,0.0027977754,0.006261236,0.0014435521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017375574,0.0005789538,0.00079053914,0.001575464,0.011804746,0.014656615,0.0022290514,0.0076273503,0.0063183806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029884517,0.00089343154,0.00094388006,0.0020908914,0.021854673,0.0059121335,0.0022807245,0.01426128,0.0010442253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014813634,0.000015580737,0.0008350689,0.000058680092,0.000009145007,0.00011721707,0.0034733054,0.00015903513,0.00035090165,0.9713543,0.0054881615,0.018123776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006608572,0.00015490716,0.021349141,0.00047658395,0.000034308956,0.0003587692,0.0029609108,0.0011715638,0.0015018063,0.1024899,0.8693104,0.00012565982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5992849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6817539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5992849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033753768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04398352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076244041","doi":"10.7202/1026917ar","title":"Un nouveau départ pour les dommages-intérêts punitifs","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.030028429148222374,"score_gpt":0.2790477683296691,"score_spread":0.24901933918144672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076244041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06854205,0.055977523,0.02366728,0.31806418,0.007983377,0.00015927205,0.0007672075,0.00025974808,0.52457935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7121615,0.01945162,0.010332037,0.048785962,0.0019495635,0.00018879134,0.00030989738,0.00031279595,0.20650785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119604,0.00251345,0.00031626291,0.0011369673,0.0034883409,0.0013489046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875766,0.005246152,0.0006013183,0.0008442715,0.004564441,0.0011671674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072053727,0.00085902546,0.0010580205,0.0024679957,0.016521435,0.016697796,0.00256605,0.007014167,0.01174413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018829403,0.0005069828,0.0008976891,0.0025806525,0.022210428,0.008090939,0.004553891,0.015642239,0.0011861145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054436394,0.000021750284,0.002464856,0.00020189575,0.000032798413,0.00029221142,0.022184012,0.00021123915,0.00045804708,0.909823,0.03340686,0.030848874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027367318,0.000070538146,0.014208843,0.0011163022,0.000063586514,0.0003508192,0.02063381,0.00046117263,0.0010055352,0.105637565,0.8562642,0.00016029048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5663376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7853019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5663376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035606943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039189234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8724327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078039457","doi":"10.2307/825939","title":"Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction: Baker V. Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Human rights; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021476845913563917,"score_gpt":0.2455718296829147,"score_spread":0.22409498376935078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078039457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05518059,0.018258676,0.007419421,0.6584543,0.0027242796,0.00044757273,0.0005525526,0.00024047015,0.2567221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67369044,0.007183457,0.008485372,0.2684237,0.00080978224,0.00018687974,0.00016247855,0.00016870012,0.04088922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570218,0.005213598,0.0016276636,0.003266509,0.025658196,0.007212324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94587845,0.025527734,0.0020005538,0.0013928135,0.020672802,0.004527631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02366749,0.00045713765,0.0007011126,0.003894693,0.019035878,0.016327465,0.004474032,0.017541701,0.0025409914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07170119,0.0009834245,0.00071316067,0.003946102,0.017421732,0.0064327484,0.0048796786,0.013737785,0.0003691396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007254874,0.000024484325,0.0047503253,0.0002670988,0.000051587383,0.0009963616,0.012656649,0.00055434403,0.0011623574,0.79682416,0.14786355,0.034776457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046014762,0.00014847395,0.02615889,0.0019117779,0.00056430965,0.00063279236,0.015050755,0.0029596982,0.0043151476,0.1763933,0.77079314,0.0006116251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9738366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095835045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095835045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28157917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69533515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081253217","doi":"10.7202/043179ar","title":"Le discours commercial en Floride : une psychothérapie-choc pour les professions au Canada et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016688866071396084,"score_gpt":0.2984876701020092,"score_spread":0.28179880403061314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081253217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13307756,0.031285778,0.0028828732,0.6745722,0.0019615933,0.00015754745,0.00027443204,0.000098153774,0.15568973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79407424,0.010741542,0.0025072703,0.06559902,0.00050323666,0.00011741206,0.00012653763,0.000059512095,0.12627128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964574,0.00081259967,0.00008945347,0.00024261307,0.0012934719,0.001104418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523723,0.0013844875,0.00028847423,0.00018400757,0.0016038035,0.0013020777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003141808,0.00031296024,0.00028240646,0.0009234692,0.013042643,0.005882784,0.0015606417,0.0054076104,0.010350324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008115514,0.00025261822,0.0004077239,0.0012747432,0.0077612964,0.002314887,0.0024367513,0.0058076703,0.0005251802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023241935,0.00020831908,0.03520539,0.00066746207,0.000060815455,0.0021722652,0.05628167,0.00090550765,0.0028128617,0.4801261,0.22871448,0.19261271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090404814,0.000124252,0.0389487,0.00090456003,0.00007643271,0.0005719921,0.04171374,0.00096272276,0.0010899106,0.012465696,0.9029368,0.00011475705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98858225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057093505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057093505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14773217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4142443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082909822","doi":"10.7202/042349ar","title":"The Supreme Court ofthe United States and the Law of Libel: A Review of Decided Cases","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Supreme court; Political science; Philosophy; Constitution; Law","score_opus":0.03784071130524521,"score_gpt":0.32733248264205306,"score_spread":0.28949177133680787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082909822","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0122711845,0.91666967,0.00022405255,0.009925409,0.0007065482,0.00004754657,0.00013287668,0.000009190622,0.060013607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15308136,0.82840663,0.0004669482,0.010636616,0.0011207078,0.00012674178,0.0002694796,0.000016051552,0.0058754473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936283,0.0023323002,0.00074130343,0.00043460383,0.0019613823,0.0009021348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860444,0.011502898,0.0008821189,0.0001733285,0.001138072,0.00025926874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006922731,0.0005274387,0.0006421535,0.014794323,0.005908251,0.010889952,0.0016158473,0.005407049,0.004221952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014199727,0.0007402216,0.0007983266,0.015972981,0.008933191,0.0050151977,0.002657158,0.0040430822,0.00070167135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012280834,0.00027298369,0.012460155,0.0052788975,0.00014182711,0.003954477,0.009031189,0.0004358836,0.0003851479,0.6593776,0.08353881,0.22500028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006553408,0.00012284407,0.027082676,0.031690378,0.00022923537,0.002286243,0.014174515,0.0003388831,0.00047036045,0.040489897,0.88294566,0.00010378846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03395712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065096855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03395712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011167927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017090892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081029356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083567563","doi":"10.1186/s13063-015-0571-y","title":"Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trials","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Drug trial; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Clinical trial; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Pathology","score_opus":0.7142664024633065,"score_gpt":0.5827133590196666,"score_spread":0.13155304344363994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083567563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012700398,0.03097589,0.016758783,0.6265585,0.28653574,0.0024620867,0.0072111166,0.0027982276,0.025429571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028478904,0.03311477,0.0631171,0.39926824,0.16921121,0.009772472,0.009361027,0.008062847,0.27961347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9182381,0.040620923,0.009820184,0.0056063808,0.02340182,0.0023125957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35799783,0.06996458,0.038270436,0.026930282,0.46489477,0.04194202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08754426,0.0013596099,0.004026509,0.006719711,0.0029647353,0.008404378,0.002022012,0.0044346643,0.07410313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51247746,0.0011509949,0.002127046,0.006568975,0.0022662415,0.005592401,0.0033860272,0.013918174,0.06999953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001070868,0.0000066148236,0.00026373932,0.00017601495,0.000020271575,0.00004309098,0.00018790214,0.000021560074,0.000056941644,0.0005637083,0.97559845,0.022954516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056106535,0.000022154016,0.00062833406,0.000856916,0.000037110658,0.00022687225,0.00031670235,0.00010615102,0.00010980706,0.0015012289,0.9960951,0.000043422846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005212074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015748192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08754426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005439683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03241361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46298385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084076798","doi":"10.7202/042698ar","title":"L'effectivité des décisions de justice en droit public interne [constitutionnel]","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Surrender; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Charter; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.025066667047781314,"score_gpt":0.3061945492865002,"score_spread":0.2811278822387189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084076798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024669034,0.0066193333,0.016136153,0.045312766,0.00090730324,0.00018707162,0.0002450117,0.00017817706,0.9057451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83827066,0.0049112733,0.011343012,0.012144754,0.0011884862,0.00029894887,0.0001570569,0.00014918213,0.13153662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604196,0.018899124,0.0014885534,0.0029850558,0.013368023,0.0028397094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96304166,0.026060157,0.0027453462,0.0032453157,0.0039120656,0.0009955063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029642828,0.0005842419,0.00063425663,0.0018999315,0.006542203,0.01906539,0.0019166633,0.006296307,0.015090336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04691352,0.0006548641,0.00083810644,0.0014422258,0.018525874,0.006140318,0.0037788297,0.0074643516,0.00238035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036392918,0.000060070543,0.00081720605,0.00014975968,0.000044844903,0.000112263704,0.0030145815,0.00033489263,0.0005929525,0.9583177,0.013901217,0.022618009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014148842,0.00022982588,0.005765179,0.0009920424,0.00014186093,0.00032898944,0.0038660576,0.0009441169,0.0042917193,0.35142788,0.63174623,0.00012458606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031069648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03645584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031069648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074331234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013879427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15676814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084711052","doi":"10.7202/043442ar","title":"L'émergence d'un principe de proportionnalité","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01862584459687153,"score_gpt":0.28623789661317056,"score_spread":0.267612052016299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084711052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037387043,0.009678998,0.37597322,0.04054249,0.0011954657,0.00023505693,0.00023709962,0.00016426545,0.5345863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8923231,0.0048119267,0.06268379,0.0067232917,0.0010457233,0.00056734344,0.000120803714,0.00021794142,0.03150611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98667127,0.0065286667,0.0006585889,0.002539625,0.0028953906,0.0007066096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835464,0.009445808,0.0017147944,0.0025250043,0.0023265823,0.000441497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014217005,0.0006576596,0.00077168,0.002344437,0.0034009295,0.008947459,0.002336098,0.0027251565,0.0061570085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020536505,0.0004990729,0.0011653173,0.0018229776,0.04232747,0.011497338,0.006019341,0.008185153,0.00081156037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002809909,0.000002755981,0.00018297441,0.000021219625,0.0000038122162,0.000010034516,0.00084726175,0.00006195327,0.000027507282,0.99705446,0.0002515862,0.0015336991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137708585,0.000043793007,0.0010124301,0.00021789849,0.000018171606,0.00018969011,0.0010055845,0.0006514737,0.0004009682,0.90661573,0.0898072,0.00002338509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037510884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034289116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014217005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005543888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005112606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07518762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084741629","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2001.tb00891.x","title":"The notwithstanding mechanism and public discussion: Lessons from the ignored practice of section 33 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Charter; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.060165392053980346,"score_gpt":0.3195389679592179,"score_spread":0.2593735759052375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084741629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051348843,0.00829233,0.011457257,0.32923213,0.0010185131,0.00007628027,0.00008980447,0.00015477283,0.5983301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921088,0.0016540202,0.0012181177,0.015535772,0.00047678407,0.00010404933,0.000020591287,0.0001260697,0.059776705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97797954,0.012923414,0.00033646572,0.0018336405,0.0026474937,0.0042793853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97700423,0.014588344,0.0015664507,0.002143074,0.0029087272,0.0017891699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023444485,0.00046970797,0.00074731157,0.0018553283,0.024888756,0.027559413,0.003870976,0.016796684,0.013306673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027726093,0.0006749819,0.0007260712,0.00203652,0.0820082,0.015352534,0.008816553,0.01522624,0.0014399395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009379092,0.000005958542,0.00014189282,0.000016408205,0.000002143588,0.00005268527,0.013131159,0.00009794456,0.00003096652,0.9806908,0.0040556127,0.001765105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007487215,0.000028598704,0.0013970765,0.000542385,0.000024878284,0.00011298382,0.037117016,0.0010154715,0.00039927525,0.5383333,0.4208722,0.00008188632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39738923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36990327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60261077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060922675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06088711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7901523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085439619","doi":"10.1177/0964663910378434","title":"Between a Hunch and a Hard Place: Making Suspicion Reasonable at the Canadian Border","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Scrutiny; Objectivity (philosophy); Empirical research; Sociology; Law; Sketch; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.06945951445316405,"score_gpt":0.408517035797288,"score_spread":0.3390575213441239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085439619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50843036,0.0056517986,0.008285215,0.099905394,0.0003420659,0.0001314763,0.0002742943,0.00007787708,0.37690142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917429,0.0008996848,0.0008198507,0.0015559798,0.000017044596,0.000007465701,0.000027912683,0.000015306503,0.004913794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98785865,0.0032468492,0.00034234204,0.001032502,0.00449395,0.0030258046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861735,0.004275952,0.0011925901,0.0006571953,0.005309512,0.0023912988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008408563,0.0003726235,0.00059798016,0.003484848,0.044282127,0.019812671,0.0027150733,0.004083933,0.0056767887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031406283,0.0006987253,0.00053699146,0.0036005685,0.040544394,0.006360083,0.00869059,0.0058810576,0.00038742644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000139052,0.000050467355,0.030583696,0.00017486137,0.000055394048,0.0021776902,0.38141042,0.0008785985,0.0011078396,0.5197982,0.019340884,0.044282794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005564044,0.000068434994,0.074527375,0.0011019214,0.00014538069,0.0006289379,0.57290834,0.0021696258,0.0017181035,0.12416833,0.22205916,0.0004487043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98734367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16247295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16247295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15990776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97141266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085666605","doi":"10.7202/1027168ar","title":"Transparence et imputabilité dans le processus de nomination des juges de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011393587174612191,"score_gpt":0.25544229449985206,"score_spread":0.24404870732523987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085666605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6260567,0.0030799834,0.004468206,0.03133597,0.00020779125,0.000115114286,0.00051728345,0.000045502904,0.33417347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777076,0.00068172853,0.00041892804,0.0007853714,0.000027499818,0.000016164398,0.00004392724,0.000015508871,0.02030336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98509765,0.0026238295,0.00033460188,0.0012586174,0.0071742246,0.0035111674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97623014,0.011137011,0.0019236424,0.0009037563,0.008227151,0.0015782472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011874844,0.000216322,0.00038089772,0.0026067458,0.0148347495,0.014131843,0.0014656215,0.0014788673,0.008116773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0435318,0.00042908985,0.00024022542,0.0044116923,0.012554399,0.0030749778,0.004751119,0.0038927882,0.00030757938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015369199,0.00004622934,0.07744148,0.00020984358,0.000088263354,0.0007888513,0.1458454,0.000757204,0.0009593971,0.67899686,0.015252671,0.079460174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043718042,0.0001131634,0.34434873,0.0009560887,0.000252809,0.00034506846,0.17931172,0.0019960322,0.005127425,0.058570784,0.40870047,0.00023394325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9145446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05640077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083553635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40921813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086013757","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.225","title":"Introduction: La Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents - une nouvelle ère dans la justice canadienne applicable aux jeunes?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07257036217329708,"score_gpt":0.2930160743327079,"score_spread":0.22044571215941078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086013757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030159626,0.14543267,0.008366586,0.35956013,0.034071557,0.00021544412,0.0022779764,0.00016550194,0.4197505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2982509,0.16910751,0.0060382807,0.15529978,0.04970567,0.0007275149,0.0015669772,0.00025812085,0.31904528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990269,0.00033133785,0.000039932132,0.00023441187,0.00022211987,0.00014537165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982016,0.0010404628,0.00017622705,0.000056052046,0.0003744757,0.00015108801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010269202,0.00057027873,0.00040111606,0.0008449776,0.0024651766,0.004984381,0.00073230616,0.0030743699,0.018401695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023230717,0.00021904676,0.00034650075,0.0010028874,0.0023719042,0.002426054,0.0021210052,0.0048226886,0.003408824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083953695,0.000105279025,0.003753847,0.001120899,0.000016017542,0.0002805257,0.011271523,0.00033958862,0.00089648063,0.5114457,0.37921613,0.09147002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049759083,0.000062335166,0.006409764,0.0011644583,0.000006641872,0.00016634955,0.0031020755,0.00016368405,0.00014612636,0.020177197,0.96857595,0.000020505207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077619245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010385927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025561675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029509626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061559737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087253847","doi":"10.7202/029649ar","title":"Interprétation large et libérale et interprétation contextuelle : convergence ou divergence ?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0194806162149177,"score_gpt":0.3179889670871959,"score_spread":0.29850835087227817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087253847","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03615624,0.015167549,0.4871278,0.060164556,0.0015677733,0.00032305488,0.00028184228,0.00030075718,0.39891046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.793955,0.0049960366,0.16886087,0.006453487,0.0014756754,0.0010567057,0.00025213434,0.00064969674,0.02230037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90548307,0.06940225,0.0038495872,0.0067054103,0.012673119,0.001886591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88488436,0.07937516,0.0043032924,0.018518299,0.011532264,0.0013865685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05037165,0.0012039625,0.0026961865,0.005881213,0.0061081275,0.020048665,0.0034963274,0.004863375,0.0076863966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09932673,0.001168659,0.0016646881,0.005637384,0.06766473,0.031308383,0.014185511,0.011757947,0.0016363505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022683125,0.000010144502,0.00036772556,0.00012716092,0.00002246586,0.000035121593,0.008905165,0.00010850263,0.00010168179,0.97912985,0.00080562633,0.010363855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016288694,0.000016245536,0.00040647457,0.00027760863,0.000017679324,0.000066766836,0.0034244396,0.0005122695,0.00027536528,0.9763773,0.018590048,0.00001937726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020053622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021711055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05037165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076339906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069901026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2663939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087641293","doi":"10.7202/043432ar","title":"Le régime juridique applicable aux ouvrages de retenue des eaux au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018045387561738478,"score_gpt":0.27581001364200897,"score_spread":0.2577646260802705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087641293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69039303,0.00484798,0.008831157,0.010319722,0.00047260942,0.0007205835,0.002088144,0.00041153614,0.28191525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7946127,0.0019360014,0.0050597647,0.0022770853,0.00009289395,0.00042371513,0.0005821582,0.000065929366,0.19494969],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464685,0.00059684546,0.000232155,0.0006261473,0.002068813,0.0018291464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909967,0.0013290048,0.0010450801,0.000530487,0.0049531898,0.0011455634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044876966,0.00032564285,0.00032458495,0.002264908,0.009017667,0.0038557388,0.0015378308,0.0015503066,0.0088843955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009256103,0.00045060564,0.00034158523,0.0018476052,0.002967248,0.00080715277,0.0016703845,0.0024166957,0.0007712418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039501244,0.00021330877,0.33094114,0.00087958534,0.00014051357,0.0016507386,0.04781685,0.007740942,0.02260914,0.16539362,0.08577376,0.33644545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034100063,0.0001503224,0.5180311,0.0006248039,0.00007254041,0.00019032769,0.012325045,0.0018346416,0.0029630729,0.0015354645,0.46206647,0.00017210636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9497996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050200403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033797212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064895876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24521708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087746324","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0026","title":"Basic rights and substantive criminal law: The Incest Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Substantive law; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.04666004204695751,"score_gpt":0.25993476191343245,"score_spread":0.21327471986647495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087746324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4520828,0.004863359,0.015870277,0.07308187,0.00023628013,0.000092119655,0.00013140276,0.000053156367,0.45358872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983403,0.00071080704,0.0013082466,0.0052903937,0.0001599916,0.00006293033,0.000023914174,0.000010394756,0.0090301605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933896,0.0021088205,0.00022476671,0.0006793594,0.0016026148,0.001994804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907952,0.00552997,0.00088914845,0.0011944836,0.00083141285,0.00075983227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006079864,0.0002900513,0.0006664987,0.0012090921,0.0052781436,0.0044372836,0.0015512996,0.0071576876,0.0029805992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012386024,0.00046182945,0.00076313916,0.0010310762,0.03373321,0.0077891694,0.008018345,0.011480545,0.00033519385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012382049,0.000024301069,0.0006809414,0.000013430184,0.0000034864076,0.00040990577,0.0016339537,0.0001284006,0.00010768658,0.99416566,0.000716216,0.0021035024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058999336,0.00007009458,0.0024965603,0.00011299932,0.00002444875,0.0009862134,0.0022708937,0.00075604685,0.000687253,0.9640132,0.02849762,0.00002565016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012379796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015017379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012379796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003961461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036194096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032153785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089437330","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jms048","title":"Dealing with Compliance and Non-Compliance: The Case of the Landmine Convention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Obligation; Convention; Persuasion; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Control (management); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05044417631193153,"score_gpt":0.3689975353635101,"score_spread":0.31855335905157856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089437330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48409933,0.0034934431,0.024999201,0.135568,0.00074801454,0.0006109095,0.00004574473,0.00011795881,0.3503173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97937554,0.00044129742,0.0032217652,0.0062780855,0.00013963286,0.0002051032,0.000008543172,0.00002304216,0.010307092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9056391,0.06497759,0.0024990104,0.004243256,0.013014712,0.009626334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.933468,0.054277636,0.0044283364,0.0028202876,0.003421666,0.001584082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04615406,0.00069659605,0.0009215526,0.0021563803,0.032906197,0.013471679,0.002864932,0.029589947,0.002674407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05967593,0.00096350274,0.0015846194,0.0015918191,0.044317733,0.012382315,0.012743052,0.017298864,0.00033737227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008167678,0.00012886635,0.004111585,0.00017038852,0.000045496105,0.013516926,0.19013664,0.00081208936,0.0011687821,0.77744204,0.004380816,0.008004681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025875974,0.000436741,0.00842247,0.0013749411,0.00023853483,0.012261579,0.30825877,0.008758403,0.006276042,0.29449406,0.35864937,0.00057028944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042348478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04726098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04615406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01371274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02183791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24408895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090170606","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009923","title":"Multidimensional Analysis as a Window into Activism Scholarship: Searching for Meaning with Sniffer Dogs","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.026944733604695032,"score_gpt":0.3102311204016027,"score_spread":0.2832863867969077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090170606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22949743,0.025518175,0.10175544,0.05312477,0.0011130661,0.00016147648,0.0002674484,0.00012622576,0.58843595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808379,0.0033082904,0.008712785,0.000858295,0.0002032465,0.00015342026,0.00004947602,0.000049986524,0.005826779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907947,0.0072690356,0.00021507003,0.0005619017,0.0008136203,0.00034564504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855503,0.011487911,0.0010365485,0.00094217755,0.00064069865,0.00034230854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083291745,0.00053254265,0.000711449,0.006156722,0.0057685296,0.013674505,0.0012712732,0.0019860486,0.006645689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013355312,0.00027636124,0.0004911801,0.0075382562,0.03810363,0.01289464,0.006730983,0.0032445937,0.00039682325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014966395,0.000010553114,0.000944548,0.000056799658,0.000004832683,0.000036518566,0.03934923,0.00010722354,0.000040015457,0.95084906,0.0010364412,0.0075499555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018699755,0.00004275851,0.004235021,0.00076159276,0.000016044247,0.00020980327,0.14232695,0.002069369,0.00024135243,0.7296716,0.12037379,0.00003304462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037566377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005418521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013674505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057553765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002945863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044049382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091504930","doi":"10.7202/043534ar","title":"Les facteurs qui militent en faveur de l'unification des voies d'action","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.04182020351605605,"score_gpt":0.31182358699557056,"score_spread":0.2700033834795145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091504930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0874453,0.009985793,0.057789113,0.048699606,0.0032095383,0.0002933214,0.0004923005,0.0003810009,0.791704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6849985,0.00421372,0.020569306,0.014739286,0.0011551904,0.0004799849,0.0002942007,0.0003010267,0.2732488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97470814,0.004694745,0.0017914198,0.0058604386,0.009679698,0.0032657036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790467,0.008204448,0.002870491,0.0042355782,0.004528909,0.0011139283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015098474,0.0006398308,0.0008314656,0.0020390016,0.009394942,0.014885107,0.002560201,0.007178734,0.01783571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028328583,0.0011962896,0.001505899,0.0018490042,0.01301246,0.009072816,0.007840417,0.012241714,0.0031871733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004909316,0.000036979436,0.0023876566,0.00015174241,0.00003241451,0.00016482167,0.006374137,0.0004306917,0.0011599751,0.9552959,0.008954827,0.024961825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047206504,0.00013989613,0.014795562,0.0009314085,0.00013575281,0.00054193335,0.0068144114,0.000926991,0.004386459,0.18762621,0.7834975,0.00015672435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034442738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051007565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034442738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010324332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017576406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0798493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209252254","doi":"","title":"Khelawon: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Testimonial; Supreme court; Admissible evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Confrontation Clause; Federal Rules of Evidence; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.03940033143006439,"score_gpt":0.3080081986644263,"score_spread":0.2686078672343619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209252254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017671451,0.018687824,0.05300819,0.6410185,0.0048513534,0.0002454244,0.00026553235,0.00006898255,0.26418266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63889354,0.0074289883,0.03854491,0.24486023,0.0038025698,0.0006097794,0.00008861355,0.00011662459,0.065654896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97011673,0.011782011,0.0018966148,0.0038543774,0.009510444,0.002839799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98256356,0.012216158,0.0005887138,0.00095971674,0.0032749348,0.0003968836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029541476,0.0005599735,0.0012598634,0.0022338128,0.011218984,0.012078158,0.0052108164,0.020333186,0.003503237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041792534,0.001063937,0.0015817515,0.0019418169,0.037340906,0.010914629,0.005461973,0.031134734,0.0006421057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007808075,0.000003403342,0.000065552515,0.000031559975,0.000004286812,0.00005678326,0.0010727292,0.00007148994,0.000049323848,0.99236274,0.0036625788,0.00261171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042636,0.000018870667,0.00057314825,0.00040374656,0.000023138517,0.00016928268,0.0013186112,0.000876936,0.0002988739,0.9160509,0.08016517,0.00005870546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08003819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09360765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08003819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016618758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022036122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15914464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093334220","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000972","title":"The Primacy of Liberty and Proportionality, Not Human Dignity, When Subjecting Criminal Law to Constitutional Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dignity; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitution","score_opus":0.13800594516062956,"score_gpt":0.38004659919723377,"score_spread":0.2420406540366042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093334220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033543747,0.03797753,0.01806969,0.48502722,0.0038592538,0.00013026489,0.00018635986,0.000081016246,0.42112496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448239,0.016974155,0.0049584103,0.09971291,0.0027328378,0.000125211,0.00007846534,0.00005628448,0.030537993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861276,0.003781942,0.0008567387,0.0017736612,0.0057397885,0.0017203199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635775,0.029774962,0.0016456858,0.001381174,0.0031366122,0.00048410284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01819079,0.00037420852,0.0012821222,0.0018005541,0.0045792754,0.009564552,0.003322513,0.009917237,0.004551492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039912276,0.00044540266,0.00095634535,0.0013602575,0.047417417,0.008330577,0.0037808623,0.010361714,0.0005405562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015652158,0.00000829294,0.00085761194,0.00018459087,0.000019201087,0.00016260242,0.0023733743,0.000090453635,0.00018455234,0.9835765,0.0056075286,0.006919578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039951254,0.000098405995,0.0056451955,0.0012934834,0.00014048713,0.00061009877,0.006841099,0.00031677386,0.0013808577,0.77249193,0.21104436,0.00009733876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0860386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13812344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0860386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009983278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012806412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17107558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093701036","doi":"10.7202/042942ar","title":"La Charte canadienne des droits et libertés: pour la protection des droits de la personne humaine ou instrument d'évolution de la société?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019662707491051673,"score_gpt":0.28479809938419154,"score_spread":0.26513539189313984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093701036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025970113,0.016933758,0.031410683,0.18711309,0.0036715504,0.00010367018,0.0003896508,0.00012910602,0.7342784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8512867,0.0096611865,0.011919913,0.014338278,0.0016873061,0.00026975662,0.00021114016,0.00013779239,0.11048795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913782,0.003240839,0.00028310818,0.0010766977,0.0026659863,0.0013551688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960924,0.004735421,0.00090235553,0.0018493277,0.0020190778,0.00088456785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008723729,0.0005556118,0.00090732664,0.0032415544,0.006939841,0.016065024,0.0018125181,0.0068694395,0.0104493555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021364022,0.00037180222,0.0007035315,0.0034175406,0.04455376,0.013023954,0.0047740918,0.010647201,0.0017263201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064453275,0.0000028258808,0.00015785122,0.000019671888,0.0000023202183,0.000013584163,0.0010776849,0.000045040997,0.000026511994,0.9926714,0.0022610528,0.0037156453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019333984,0.000037979145,0.0019287043,0.0004599127,0.000014053651,0.00008107945,0.0031996905,0.00027282548,0.00023520124,0.7177573,0.27594054,0.00005333867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045555674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056304704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009740883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01710867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09058106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093779849","doi":"10.5539/res.v6n2p120","title":"Our Criminal Law Should Only Be 200 Years Out of Date - and It Should Be Consolidated","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Criminal law; Legislation; Law; Consolidation (business); Political science; Remainder; English law; Criminal procedure; Democracy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.3142786508652401,"score_gpt":0.4538553097503281,"score_spread":0.13957665888508802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093779849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023178244,0.28838646,0.011974716,0.4633515,0.018803496,0.00011437955,0.0007716645,0.00015337119,0.19326614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44832173,0.2263809,0.015258876,0.21873477,0.0111139715,0.00022654927,0.0011821981,0.00023507394,0.07854589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141896,0.0030675358,0.0007856422,0.0009673453,0.0030189124,0.00074163004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96694916,0.013724021,0.003619232,0.0027583418,0.010421744,0.0025275615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013441605,0.00033657253,0.0008957364,0.0020380693,0.0047642123,0.009910076,0.0014565574,0.0042737457,0.011197993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032737214,0.00038962724,0.00047396385,0.0017232382,0.007828149,0.017431961,0.004146807,0.0075320415,0.0037076718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010026514,0.00015692148,0.00388442,0.0019858947,0.00010633617,0.000375251,0.004271408,0.0001490973,0.00083236804,0.676888,0.12144771,0.18980235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009225462,0.000083052684,0.005105339,0.002475861,0.000028531398,0.00029484075,0.0024641396,0.00003473852,0.00031525423,0.04190413,0.9472514,0.000033440225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005758139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009719821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013441605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044496427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012710393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07108688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094737464","doi":"10.7202/1027852ar","title":"Les aspects historiques de la qualification de la prescription en droit international privé","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Medical prescription; Philosophy; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.01526697576060611,"score_gpt":0.3046865031662425,"score_spread":0.2894195274056364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094737464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10398393,0.030942775,0.012124702,0.19679046,0.002176372,0.00010868553,0.00072231656,0.000088040404,0.65306276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8060424,0.017278412,0.0024880967,0.021259936,0.001018842,0.00009340521,0.00018612639,0.00011158667,0.15152124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462456,0.0017332328,0.00030643772,0.0006173134,0.0015393757,0.0011791565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894582,0.005769928,0.0011253201,0.0005962369,0.0024891358,0.00056118553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006959685,0.00023656692,0.00031005515,0.0023490118,0.00814215,0.0068016117,0.00095558167,0.004823979,0.009735856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015349089,0.00053497753,0.0003446601,0.0030335824,0.02217455,0.005271823,0.0027832072,0.008666066,0.0008011219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015051894,0.000008331541,0.0014742005,0.00009119224,0.0000035766557,0.00018121998,0.017946804,0.00015963915,0.0001423089,0.96087205,0.008433908,0.010671692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011117111,0.000052829047,0.01488533,0.0009311844,0.000013578015,0.00034438353,0.01402299,0.00039708483,0.0007719245,0.046355862,0.9221119,0.00010179783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48022705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5109711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48022705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034173314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027887126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95486367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095035352","doi":"10.7202/043293ar","title":"La technique législative québécoise d'entrée en vigueur des lois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.014284461297190158,"score_gpt":0.2816173892682008,"score_spread":0.26733292797101066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095035352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06346984,0.006285319,0.08770718,0.047335073,0.0014254204,0.000501904,0.00040473332,0.00039398408,0.7924764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6402489,0.0028073406,0.0320372,0.0061687464,0.0002370307,0.00043280332,0.00013162446,0.00016783725,0.31776854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99009377,0.0034757643,0.00035705935,0.0015136749,0.0032031299,0.0013566114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176776,0.0028890283,0.00077329855,0.0010560835,0.0030154777,0.00049825973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010621037,0.0005457168,0.00053408823,0.002809373,0.01261043,0.007896992,0.0018942162,0.0030193713,0.011728257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014382599,0.00050840457,0.0006616004,0.0023778125,0.015498794,0.002914569,0.0025494169,0.0060252803,0.0016264127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021731246,0.000015963522,0.0021758082,0.00012519192,0.000024897277,0.00011016563,0.014489813,0.00035784204,0.0010992693,0.9343184,0.012101844,0.0351591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035475146,0.000099472214,0.016187115,0.0008010181,0.00011665492,0.0003225215,0.012089489,0.001594378,0.0043432205,0.06911546,0.8951088,0.00018636443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5215103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72641295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4784897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025499396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046791926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96261525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095042302","doi":"10.7202/042512ar","title":"Processus décisionnels, justice naturelle et équité procédurale dans la jurisprudence comparée de la Cour fédérale et des cours ontariennes et québécoises","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Natural justice; Sociology; Administrative law; Judicial review; Political science","score_opus":0.01711536684098008,"score_gpt":0.3235766174176489,"score_spread":0.30646125057666884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095042302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21346043,0.04926583,0.08622843,0.0787199,0.0007629599,0.0002773943,0.0002304826,0.0000741835,0.5709804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97268265,0.0036938128,0.007966622,0.0011871257,0.00013638106,0.00008697908,0.000031728403,0.00001935291,0.014195445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758592,0.013633137,0.00058137596,0.0015110855,0.0060740146,0.0023410725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882464,0.008291211,0.0008641947,0.0004830769,0.0017034385,0.00041168582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017698746,0.00054871273,0.0007483491,0.0034138137,0.010642556,0.017210066,0.0016851624,0.003656949,0.0028231968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022908768,0.0004322617,0.000490225,0.0037739608,0.035724286,0.007248881,0.0026169715,0.00477551,0.00017447463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009081726,0.000006174374,0.0004923594,0.0000244971,0.0000066633756,0.000045751247,0.004894397,0.00032617786,0.000052709755,0.9889163,0.00048276287,0.0047431523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036688394,0.000053459557,0.007938972,0.00051116606,0.00004759137,0.0001058902,0.011757396,0.002923484,0.00066053064,0.8411926,0.13469568,0.000076579905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5594976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61258453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042451516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042906757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8861932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099473540","doi":"10.7202/039341ar","title":"La création de la détention pour enquête en common law : dérive jurisprudentielle ou évolution nécessaire ? Un point de vue pragmatique","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovative Medicines Canada; GLS Industries (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.006728540014539198,"score_gpt":0.28824518846669844,"score_spread":0.28151664845215923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099473540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18645748,0.014277511,0.037727986,0.16274744,0.0008502071,0.00017387207,0.00030595867,0.00009103579,0.5973686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.937294,0.0037682722,0.0059509766,0.0036359522,0.00033965753,0.00005914506,0.00009224738,0.00011712275,0.04874254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889957,0.004776244,0.00035032837,0.0014897839,0.0029345406,0.0014534263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849629,0.0051549575,0.0015827421,0.0018541951,0.004677326,0.0017679208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012392727,0.00030772312,0.0005301592,0.001995419,0.010289379,0.016078135,0.002509628,0.005032638,0.0094941985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019345755,0.00044134213,0.00048407487,0.0026318918,0.041964214,0.010552963,0.0062047723,0.007201413,0.0008757772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011706054,0.000019969795,0.0017472245,0.000047976784,0.000007867907,0.00013825754,0.013742625,0.00012775068,0.00021073499,0.9717335,0.0014994333,0.010713014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030175874,0.0000953451,0.022980543,0.0010475791,0.000042374064,0.0006379928,0.04172046,0.0009107742,0.0018147316,0.3745582,0.5560196,0.0001422312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09855008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21091796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09855008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0265318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036915973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19595289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102026828","doi":"","title":"Canada's Experience with Constitutionalism and Criminal Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.014521125493442992,"score_gpt":0.2756632039325957,"score_spread":0.2611420784391527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102026828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089304335,0.024428487,0.002753556,0.30955988,0.0021433122,0.00009394765,0.00040485593,0.00013427703,0.5711773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836005,0.012511274,0.0010919751,0.02974103,0.00034040268,0.00004443801,0.00012061983,0.00010446126,0.072445236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985635,0.002421692,0.00028524667,0.0012240919,0.005242713,0.005191254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98463154,0.0058962465,0.0006705752,0.00061007,0.004168858,0.0040226434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069945226,0.00048773226,0.00061881397,0.0025380696,0.0545319,0.018378893,0.002660122,0.0067725503,0.010943607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017326372,0.0006524532,0.00057301694,0.006692109,0.042526342,0.004910664,0.006551646,0.010464533,0.0003741188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029433933,0.000023864759,0.003889189,0.00009903694,0.000016572183,0.0009955992,0.044271294,0.0004515246,0.0001805308,0.8547344,0.06683063,0.02847796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026095,0.00002099909,0.007308861,0.00025952669,0.000021600172,0.00038717355,0.025080545,0.000339073,0.00017509519,0.026935585,0.93933606,0.000115270755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.264249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.264249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32836166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85336685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102433557","doi":"10.7202/1000619ar","title":"Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Charter; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06625086608774737,"score_gpt":0.33006917552828835,"score_spread":0.26381830944054097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102433557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17428961,0.015163852,0.0021371823,0.2583551,0.00081635267,0.000078474855,0.00022308786,0.00009241423,0.5488438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436088,0.003300531,0.0007282507,0.021196906,0.00012944118,0.000017709364,0.00003612883,0.000037289366,0.030944932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964031,0.00062126684,0.00005114906,0.00034506642,0.0012750574,0.001304306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739957,0.0011517593,0.0001263503,0.000093423965,0.0007213722,0.00050754915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035513141,0.00034000754,0.00031422518,0.0016277862,0.031052541,0.010942849,0.0014711567,0.004278335,0.003256629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068462933,0.00032748998,0.00024710444,0.0017724895,0.021752417,0.003202841,0.003201071,0.006832725,0.00021417692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050581348,0.000018553756,0.0034330494,0.000075047676,0.000009934179,0.0009584205,0.08034517,0.0003267581,0.0007603816,0.83989495,0.05347318,0.020653993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048259168,0.000038694583,0.01934555,0.00045560653,0.00007811111,0.00033734165,0.13682166,0.001094773,0.001749132,0.06412442,0.7756389,0.00026756484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99150765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11886509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11886509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1248558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86243063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104325844","doi":"10.7202/017308ar","title":"Significations et interprétations de la gravité des événements violents : le cas des voies de fait traitées à la Cour municipale de Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.2760373960488288,"score_gpt":0.4555213728194736,"score_spread":0.17948397677064476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104325844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872071,0.0006471573,0.00031813438,0.0014536828,0.000009727969,0.00001227358,0.0001728684,0.000010925648,0.010168003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907756,0.00011419935,0.000081610386,0.000022421678,0.000008100089,0.0000029081061,0.000030247149,0.0000027380788,0.0006602021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976483,0.0007641752,0.00007563939,0.00029401082,0.0007101209,0.0005077015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98978806,0.0051744315,0.003019028,0.00026814468,0.0011665104,0.00058386906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019099487,0.00048206587,0.00024501857,0.0044137267,0.0022670613,0.0044822083,0.001252715,0.0010657314,0.0049670953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017812321,0.00030622294,0.000467047,0.0032512764,0.0071961484,0.0010158283,0.0021178517,0.0012431317,0.00015346316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013973615,0.000034730838,0.93475425,0.000055684326,0.00016136891,0.0014249078,0.02099085,0.00081606896,0.0008631099,0.02164887,0.00066681684,0.018443618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076677115,0.0000202391,0.9848567,0.00002630258,0.000045196786,0.00022628435,0.010811238,0.00075898657,0.00017054519,0.0013236532,0.0017315351,0.000021492942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7868916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77997243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21310842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015911946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047304025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4287269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109432895","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1292","title":"Doré: All That Glitters is Not Gold","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Tribunal; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Political science; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0986680875583345,"score_gpt":0.35984204932029845,"score_spread":0.26117396176196395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109432895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046050926,0.04009005,0.0051034233,0.7056955,0.014714082,0.000107790256,0.0003062879,0.0002809833,0.2290968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17870197,0.012484021,0.005250444,0.534009,0.0034929116,0.00011530731,0.00018816438,0.00038034996,0.26537785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97657806,0.0050640646,0.0007944445,0.002851019,0.012523434,0.0021890502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97750026,0.0074182632,0.00078366976,0.0025314619,0.01048977,0.001276591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013556569,0.0005273897,0.0011615072,0.0019813983,0.012150711,0.013554165,0.0023145569,0.010065953,0.00922258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04408815,0.00046367594,0.0006935909,0.0012137381,0.022557797,0.007743609,0.0039938865,0.015119322,0.002151547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028402497,0.00001485246,0.00068212394,0.00023979893,0.000030196323,0.00030288717,0.004310021,0.00013484279,0.00039901194,0.45162377,0.4962776,0.045956444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071305562,0.000009540857,0.00053728366,0.0003817054,0.000010652074,0.00009252436,0.0010982349,0.00005929001,0.00022057291,0.022503184,0.9750469,0.00003305132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52608556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65502554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52608556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028141769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047415413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95341086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111984693","doi":"10.7202/043495ar","title":"Quebec's Comprehensive Auto No-Fault Scheme and the Failure of Any of the United States to Follow","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Government (linguistics); Individualism; State (computer science); Tort; Politics; Position (finance); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Liability; Finance","score_opus":0.012292465200847962,"score_gpt":0.2622544225348903,"score_spread":0.24996195733404233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111984693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16981022,0.01845447,0.0019956664,0.31646943,0.0015503274,0.00021800492,0.002133959,0.00011782498,0.48925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83213234,0.0059207347,0.0015436956,0.058411956,0.00018219692,0.000076312186,0.0005019419,0.000022333803,0.101208456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969909,0.00036041404,0.00009303828,0.0002909315,0.0012326776,0.0010319859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913556,0.0016964702,0.00056297716,0.0005186134,0.0045585437,0.0013078568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029311923,0.00021855421,0.00036341266,0.0010181818,0.010613955,0.005883369,0.0012668305,0.0033288084,0.0074644964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009340748,0.0002674137,0.00033769087,0.0012013608,0.0045444868,0.0021899357,0.0017341956,0.0035466873,0.00038695507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011862579,0.000117683776,0.032520212,0.00029574046,0.00011516888,0.0007471374,0.004397511,0.001312154,0.0005730942,0.63474995,0.23603314,0.089019544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010616528,0.00012781624,0.120112255,0.0012826371,0.00020990217,0.0003440754,0.008047535,0.0015180834,0.00090672064,0.019217573,0.8479506,0.0001765771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99500966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045875687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045875687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09505605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33285296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112670833","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2348705","title":"Reconciling the Principled Approach to Hearsay with the Rule of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025418034007989008,"score_gpt":0.2818038341356844,"score_spread":0.25638580012769535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112670833","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014609167,0.0021058195,0.4816157,0.1246141,0.001949446,0.00027342586,0.0002867839,0.0002327987,0.37431285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84379923,0.0010861239,0.113342755,0.017235681,0.0026004564,0.0006878633,0.0001414292,0.0002146271,0.020891862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95751214,0.019716976,0.0023128353,0.0054797935,0.012748158,0.0022300528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96221006,0.023335528,0.0015814793,0.0063094776,0.005599158,0.0009643279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0345184,0.0007931549,0.0022261846,0.0029937667,0.0065198457,0.013281996,0.00555601,0.013452718,0.0076342514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05460917,0.0012801003,0.0022826283,0.0014113138,0.07059263,0.018109258,0.009274386,0.018754303,0.0020567332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005248981,0.000005122472,0.000041188432,0.000017806387,0.0000063776884,0.000018763689,0.00038433747,0.00014773513,0.00002864293,0.9972324,0.00074084825,0.0013715893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011958127,0.0000048216975,0.000047116766,0.00002127329,0.0000046121027,0.00003255144,0.00007666003,0.0002750532,0.000050015777,0.99642485,0.0030427587,0.000008178332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005123017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005959244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0345184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005725679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011106301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18255293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112852255","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.4.316","title":"The Enduring Legacy of ‘Reckless Disregard’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Demise; Duty; Law; Duty of care; Proposition; Order (exchange); Common law; Political science; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.04968559655905262,"score_gpt":0.38046439981864427,"score_spread":0.33077880325959164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112852255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19435464,0.062481932,0.018896703,0.27147952,0.0025384813,0.000082481405,0.00021614696,0.00015548473,0.44979465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9041532,0.010474195,0.0022583725,0.06402705,0.0009030647,0.000031864893,0.000066736764,0.000052307507,0.018033145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717723,0.008073391,0.0013445128,0.0034639593,0.01366214,0.0016837516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95150834,0.029308641,0.005409058,0.0041899714,0.008366656,0.0012173922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02020824,0.00022254807,0.00060711725,0.0028869773,0.006644461,0.0073511587,0.0024547474,0.007012108,0.0024780887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06021208,0.0005210809,0.00050186075,0.0020855484,0.037173104,0.008298447,0.005775543,0.010782294,0.00065731467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017747692,0.00002322663,0.00488388,0.00036881282,0.000078528225,0.00079222105,0.03523082,0.00014596773,0.000268686,0.84408146,0.039256614,0.074852064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013328327,0.00009227778,0.02039457,0.001957007,0.00012659346,0.002769773,0.02113325,0.0002768203,0.0015498289,0.22976047,0.7217607,0.00016540244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05492547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106887236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05492547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052891355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00794119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109211564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117837668","doi":"10.7202/039339ar","title":"La consolidation des fondements de la responsabilité pénale en droit criminel canadien depuis l’entrée en vigueur de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011381799461153294,"score_gpt":0.2898497564251077,"score_spread":0.2784679569639544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117837668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22207478,0.012848987,0.007330348,0.066989616,0.0006095023,0.00014499464,0.00033360187,0.000071035356,0.68959713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8748751,0.003408775,0.0021446995,0.0035795528,0.00012478624,0.0000555302,0.00012001308,0.00004521605,0.115646295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926063,0.0014230845,0.00017926286,0.00069510913,0.002791307,0.0023049342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873144,0.0038589262,0.0011261657,0.0008221289,0.0048188507,0.0020595908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006166621,0.00038719716,0.00049030257,0.003898976,0.013628834,0.014035259,0.0014020443,0.0033334184,0.012222285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015856713,0.00037765465,0.00043179118,0.0042937594,0.016820727,0.0040171803,0.0060166195,0.0065582753,0.00074862235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043919754,0.000024142357,0.0068671494,0.00007943743,0.000020657182,0.00030066416,0.033383485,0.00034717002,0.00038474312,0.9171857,0.0076081064,0.033754796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026317988,0.00010166952,0.09196948,0.0011436621,0.00008484296,0.00038941283,0.056484696,0.00088762806,0.0019524455,0.09270705,0.7540588,0.0001941173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75441194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8863551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24558806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055407356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083615184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49406874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118048514","doi":"10.7202/042630ar","title":"La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.01902072770710905,"score_gpt":0.2910930769058893,"score_spread":0.27207234919878026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118048514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056891754,0.09941738,0.002897744,0.0522009,0.0041253744,0.00005459818,0.00068421045,0.000083977524,0.7836441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.625144,0.05366875,0.0032659953,0.00909103,0.0030495452,0.00014609171,0.00042361542,0.000094190495,0.3051167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972161,0.0011919016,0.000099076235,0.00026211527,0.00086862536,0.00036221993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797994,0.0013049077,0.0002550232,0.00009257078,0.00021135775,0.00015607344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021129085,0.0006501275,0.000562038,0.001734823,0.0041566957,0.0080624875,0.00038374626,0.002913861,0.020080604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008297227,0.00027670505,0.0003961101,0.001572543,0.0033680592,0.003132877,0.0017605276,0.0072352565,0.0018361353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006667221,0.000045554694,0.0029054082,0.00018459136,0.000043184235,0.0012740291,0.008220145,0.00026041365,0.00032430273,0.832749,0.05688701,0.09703966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023504856,0.000018578752,0.006089711,0.00036037687,0.000009102838,0.00076785684,0.002024121,0.00009102642,0.00030010418,0.021316145,0.9689715,0.00002803425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07651875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069643386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07651875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004933355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038658509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1521467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121600658","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.75","title":"Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Jurisdiction; Law; Convention; Scots law; Common law; Conformity; Legislation; Political science; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.3150991231661772,"score_gpt":0.46799635396163064,"score_spread":0.15289723079545342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121600658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062408194,0.40261298,0.0023902408,0.4729132,0.0037697484,0.00009001159,0.000103372164,0.000015982028,0.055696305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63444716,0.24442819,0.0032930912,0.096964195,0.0015069913,0.00014467853,0.00008163462,0.0000450265,0.019089041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828126,0.00918125,0.0017179478,0.001079748,0.0028374076,0.0023711396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455185,0.035466887,0.0027631174,0.002662713,0.009534086,0.004054766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03313495,0.00047886203,0.0015885019,0.004450965,0.0051210024,0.014865192,0.0024729995,0.012213614,0.0037404026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07131706,0.00079721975,0.0007847486,0.0043049296,0.023057826,0.019093603,0.008761719,0.010204064,0.00048678642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022943613,0.00013137184,0.0067303386,0.0038906324,0.00009574893,0.0051558306,0.073375285,0.00054037076,0.00062976626,0.6181669,0.037341174,0.25371313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010132028,0.0004808841,0.039350037,0.02590035,0.00018601533,0.0043105637,0.1321764,0.0005303429,0.0006773241,0.25639063,0.5394795,0.00041669433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34232152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4900426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34232152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02365621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0454714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122430379","doi":"","title":"Sui Not-So-Generous: The Unconstitutionality of Canadian Court Martial Jury Trials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Political science; Appeal; Charter; Democracy; Adversarial system; Jury trial; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.061069714058947164,"score_gpt":0.3479511611826425,"score_spread":0.28688144712369534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122430379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2104882,0.018487906,0.0032356116,0.26242977,0.0019959505,0.00032360957,0.0008893401,0.00009431453,0.5020553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318236,0.00418994,0.0014519993,0.043637697,0.00037156988,0.000111969486,0.00017490127,0.000044742603,0.018193565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633969,0.007394023,0.0011937958,0.0036183565,0.018136503,0.0062604137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93067443,0.037389994,0.0043290323,0.0034493685,0.018868716,0.005288343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029019339,0.00035533274,0.00082365604,0.002989301,0.022962272,0.009211297,0.0036804876,0.008459942,0.0055630463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15266085,0.00058172364,0.00050326914,0.0044641797,0.015553479,0.003833006,0.00443269,0.0088512525,0.00032522957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034306414,0.00005816768,0.022294804,0.0002841052,0.00012268078,0.00083903555,0.011230188,0.0006175513,0.00048874563,0.78753734,0.09166072,0.084523655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048407234,0.00021255808,0.14581947,0.002009072,0.00048080893,0.00075666176,0.016373333,0.003491555,0.0021631573,0.22420746,0.6034697,0.0005320973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9473088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97877014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057205606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14223038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41505766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124166509","doi":"10.7202/040788ar","title":"La Charte canadienne des droits et libertés comme instrument de dialogue entre le tribunal et le législateur","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Charter; Freedom of expression; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08470558627733961,"score_gpt":0.3577829083021117,"score_spread":0.2730773220247721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124166509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008198707,0.02180076,0.011481676,0.113326095,0.006786427,0.00031394258,0.0018468066,0.00029188252,0.8359538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3279851,0.009575034,0.014306768,0.03494196,0.0012105171,0.0006209265,0.0010561702,0.00029881246,0.6100046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820708,0.0035051354,0.00059218385,0.0014868083,0.008732559,0.0036125672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924055,0.0015403369,0.00042505894,0.0006716112,0.0039390693,0.0010184369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882958,0.0006833275,0.00058727426,0.002590829,0.011816651,0.017163634,0.0019419177,0.008150399,0.01243678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014900427,0.00066398236,0.0007712656,0.0037938827,0.018193832,0.0045547406,0.0037524982,0.012918648,0.002364129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011498653,0.000007798214,0.00021456362,0.000043307613,0.0000032559637,0.000028588274,0.001997437,0.0000934362,0.00011312048,0.9343417,0.056071352,0.007073773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015942991,0.000009322071,0.0019915623,0.00015530743,0.000006275367,0.000041244737,0.0012288735,0.000073642565,0.00026225945,0.031201769,0.964968,0.000045707264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8396977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87487924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16030228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04434532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14532514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3224926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125259591","doi":"","title":"Identity Theft and Consumer Protection: Finding Sensible Approaches to Safeguard Personal Data in the United States and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Identity theft; Identity (music); Business; Consumer protection; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Computer security; Commerce; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.22332751756066196,"score_gpt":0.3179300503488369,"score_spread":0.09460253278817496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125259591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40769067,0.03749086,0.0050760955,0.19799675,0.00044955203,0.00038381093,0.00072468305,0.000058941492,0.35012868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471869,0.023747146,0.0035633233,0.011302882,0.00004292588,0.00005800847,0.00016580737,0.000021929309,0.013911123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98906916,0.0016304338,0.0004062754,0.00062210986,0.004872281,0.0033997807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97811186,0.0071807997,0.0014590697,0.00055711647,0.010218875,0.0024723771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071291034,0.00029551107,0.00047624524,0.0054455833,0.026184335,0.011350653,0.0022990403,0.0036057148,0.0030501033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03380469,0.00045461397,0.0005345013,0.0075280857,0.01155554,0.0038684683,0.00496484,0.005601419,0.0001369726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016284572,0.00014351225,0.0770121,0.00054332794,0.00008502836,0.0015976828,0.055604924,0.0018899452,0.0003788946,0.65386164,0.040546894,0.16817327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380738,0.00011692173,0.19711654,0.0033556032,0.00041660058,0.0011451367,0.2575126,0.006027398,0.0024734868,0.090054624,0.44116908,0.00047398754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16004905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16004905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31100625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97422403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130495","doi":"","title":"All Convictions Are Not the Same: Rethinking CUPE’s Abuse of Process Doctrine in Cases Involving Plea Bargains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Plea; Rebuttal; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Warrant; Innocence; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.10482562282533785,"score_gpt":0.3827937724761825,"score_spread":0.27796814965084465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130130495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22107968,0.007261956,0.05861045,0.2528561,0.002879603,0.00053378794,0.00012714695,0.0001836654,0.45646754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307727,0.0018332754,0.010144527,0.045535587,0.00084235775,0.0001600333,0.0000399899,0.00007972153,0.010591758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94810563,0.016922591,0.0026134318,0.0063511687,0.017971637,0.008035531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9228879,0.05849567,0.0029566435,0.0062434934,0.0074499124,0.0019664392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.065465964,0.00067287846,0.001262835,0.003343792,0.021410195,0.020611135,0.0062557585,0.025187198,0.0019390575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10133666,0.0013785772,0.001927829,0.0026744849,0.05328728,0.018625515,0.014165167,0.036512163,0.0004148293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044637774,0.000042034844,0.0025364838,0.00005062065,0.000023877776,0.003633034,0.022201844,0.00046463398,0.00040557256,0.9471744,0.008775135,0.014647783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025262203,0.00017987197,0.013588621,0.0024265076,0.00040112878,0.006677353,0.0413721,0.010870742,0.0039274073,0.5966344,0.32309222,0.0005770157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19221245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30907133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80778754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02288357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03698298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3821873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130774242","doi":"10.7202/017307ar","title":"La négociation des plaidoyers de culpabilité : une pratique hétérogène","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Sentence; Economic Justice; Minor (academic); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Principal (computer security); Charge (physics); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Physics; Computer science; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.28967699562129556,"score_gpt":0.4402769995500537,"score_spread":0.15060000392875816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130774242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6894296,0.04151122,0.027263336,0.10518364,0.00039910743,0.00009667076,0.0001542442,0.000048995968,0.13591336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839866,0.004184727,0.0017592133,0.0023139997,0.00042003582,0.00003505224,0.000026220563,0.000012946764,0.0072611542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362504,0.0043795193,0.000129603,0.0005870874,0.00084174017,0.0004370478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793006,0.008925445,0.0015823799,0.000621016,0.0007143694,0.00022676871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007692119,0.00030613597,0.00074416335,0.0016125875,0.005704736,0.006637,0.0013620653,0.0033474902,0.004172253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024446413,0.0003524675,0.00022790136,0.0015341662,0.024911802,0.0058454922,0.0029820746,0.0031905246,0.00031465688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002646044,0.0002708447,0.07719264,0.00037868362,0.00006794903,0.010466834,0.2439968,0.0006837047,0.0020865204,0.44324845,0.00703463,0.21430826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009661029,0.0005766499,0.13044593,0.0009773824,0.00009957365,0.03482923,0.29701617,0.002406199,0.0037346801,0.17445844,0.3551743,0.00018491232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030678183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03945404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030678183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006486244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032144284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060999215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137752808","doi":"10.1177/026975800501200205","title":"The Constitutional Validity of the Corporal Punishment Defence in Canada: A Critical Analysis of Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law Versus Canada (Attorney General)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Charter; Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Human rights; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.053243791391118955,"score_gpt":0.3387063066031367,"score_spread":0.28546251521201776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137752808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1631649,0.06119971,0.0025958412,0.28737143,0.0014524346,0.00030666354,0.0007122107,0.000061995925,0.48313487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289652,0.013292452,0.0011229275,0.03311561,0.00027361643,0.00012862223,0.00010694178,0.00006410925,0.02293047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97912997,0.0028045264,0.0004765419,0.0014884467,0.0070704217,0.009030098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781487,0.009988934,0.0011231471,0.00043973196,0.0084583955,0.0018411225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136807505,0.00070969947,0.0014473075,0.005579457,0.055846516,0.02296656,0.005554801,0.013709948,0.003869992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033963516,0.000879882,0.0010842031,0.009059984,0.040880058,0.0050651794,0.0049492796,0.01434721,0.00019638066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027607937,0.000020672796,0.0022626529,0.00013325401,0.000029851526,0.00055982906,0.039656743,0.00027895503,0.00012072897,0.9222064,0.025375772,0.009327531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012908046,0.000084928935,0.04259542,0.0034424218,0.00056410197,0.00043879362,0.17685957,0.0020176028,0.0010676697,0.1668046,0.6054267,0.00056914013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99663097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99800724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31288865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31288865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3924907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7969518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138053969","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110701.002","title":"On Commitments in Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal responsibility; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.1060817457554464,"score_gpt":0.34357845616626986,"score_spread":0.23749671041082346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138053969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06264259,0.0038656776,0.037498802,0.03749891,0.00052518264,0.00013945208,0.00015429626,0.000059777845,0.8576153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597595,0.0018066842,0.003787995,0.0024817733,0.00032764702,0.00017876028,0.00008250603,0.000050055514,0.031525124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550724,0.0022184798,0.00018063406,0.0006283916,0.0009301672,0.0005351393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957266,0.0023041277,0.00038931673,0.00043297198,0.0007649472,0.00038213434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003534126,0.00047146523,0.0003609085,0.0022531375,0.005453538,0.004763631,0.001214642,0.002626996,0.012984294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063333674,0.00029237964,0.000595396,0.0018597266,0.023650847,0.007869712,0.005757432,0.004701847,0.00095640006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016491814,0.0000032924938,0.00011366158,0.000006648623,8.720721e-7,0.00001884532,0.00054257055,0.00012699713,0.000010571892,0.9977518,0.0005730865,0.00084999687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008787777,0.000011980624,0.0005194529,0.00008887224,0.0000031376335,0.000039080725,0.0011200703,0.0014597428,0.00005546842,0.9655672,0.031115418,0.000010777911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012559411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006276683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012984294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008265748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004076597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059972465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138983123","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.1074","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Robert J Sharpe, Katherine E Swinton, and Roach Kent, 2nd edn. Toronto: twin Law Inc, 2002. ISBN 1-55221-063-4 Pbk, Np.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02046895009650561,"score_gpt":0.28996619938722806,"score_spread":0.26949724929072244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138983123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013861913,0.4389354,0.004849444,0.0699833,0.015606141,0.00052952964,0.028143909,0.0005660282,0.44000006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029217215,0.28832364,0.011874904,0.0068758507,0.0023562133,0.00030439964,0.011885579,0.00058238057,0.64857984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729794,0.00018282738,0.00014996705,0.00025473256,0.0018172347,0.00029742395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973266,0.00024353807,0.00019079934,0.0001342724,0.0017574914,0.0003473182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026674124,0.0020849502,0.001195122,0.009788368,0.0076458273,0.006796953,0.0025615676,0.0029921632,0.036975313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004392843,0.0014986892,0.0005989641,0.017153412,0.0054365313,0.004581506,0.0016585055,0.0045750304,0.008973017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061101778,0.00000444449,0.00010868325,0.00008118192,0.0000029763635,0.000019255933,0.00024478583,0.000074275034,0.000025661495,0.025728358,0.95402247,0.01968174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033163444,0.0000024222063,0.0015699604,0.00021736594,0.0000034157642,0.00003877301,0.00023287049,0.000043471697,0.00003435013,0.0031131557,0.99472237,0.00001848742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98480725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057332646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057332646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091301486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41597944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140211516","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-004","title":"Appointment of Thomas A. Cromwell to the Supreme Court of Canada*","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.025721809059974596,"score_gpt":0.22930305624783698,"score_spread":0.20358124718786239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140211516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956458,0.05378912,0.0015519556,0.15807092,0.006656345,0.000090401954,0.00025028715,0.0000872903,0.7695472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18028842,0.029848201,0.0013580528,0.04585477,0.00089772086,0.00004165692,0.00010855552,0.000089463676,0.7415132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984301,0.0001980248,0.000022907823,0.00015220493,0.0006731536,0.00052366144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910396,0.0002828167,0.000033378325,0.00001956819,0.0003569997,0.00020336322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009158236,0.00029350683,0.0003035213,0.0014905739,0.015818436,0.0043250616,0.0008985706,0.0029235291,0.009911911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029496877,0.00035179008,0.00023416975,0.0015889412,0.0048181573,0.0015822547,0.0011530255,0.0057061184,0.0011033766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012628668,0.000016942351,0.00089029234,0.000074656695,0.000005230487,0.0006128563,0.006945245,0.00016344011,0.00026486884,0.3744607,0.5804442,0.036108863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003184187,0.000007649709,0.0019303176,0.00021976435,0.0000061414053,0.00017712684,0.0035680544,0.00010714474,0.00022790131,0.0081062075,0.98561895,0.000027526887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9369966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95976233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040237673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056345135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2919461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140216640","doi":"10.7202/042629ar","title":"Le droit à la vie privée des personnes homosexuelles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Right to Privacy; Tort; Information privacy law; Charter; Confidentiality; Information privacy; Privacy law; Political science; Statute; Secrecy; Privacy policy; Law; Personally identifiable information; Common law; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Human rights; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.014974942064484922,"score_gpt":0.26975151526740027,"score_spread":0.25477657320291536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140216640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4077192,0.05621487,0.0043250183,0.04123377,0.0013024918,0.00005415566,0.0006645622,0.00014534288,0.48834065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8236995,0.020936621,0.0015327353,0.003953804,0.00027763023,0.000043753556,0.00015389301,0.000022427663,0.1493797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903166,0.0002949879,0.000026183612,0.00007413912,0.00037952876,0.00019349136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928683,0.0003018491,0.00016070179,0.00004508444,0.0000904314,0.00011509531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008093783,0.0001351566,0.0002600037,0.000611783,0.003178012,0.0021614209,0.00019056043,0.001051712,0.015567086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024211037,0.00013441515,0.00022010275,0.000556699,0.0021825545,0.001859007,0.0012630316,0.0014600549,0.0013281874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085808206,0.00012803834,0.045690678,0.00030017234,0.00003558566,0.0034958282,0.051948722,0.00054422085,0.0025658652,0.49881947,0.043460883,0.35292473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010026816,0.0000762865,0.033163,0.0002859608,0.00000941501,0.0045965803,0.019786611,0.00019295563,0.00038394786,0.009790255,0.931666,0.000038994003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07900564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10596054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07900564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022754981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033258735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15709156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141118983","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.3.279","title":"Framed by Section 8: Constitutional Protection of Privacy in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Search and seizure; Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Data Protection Act 1998; Privacy law; Privacy laws of the United States; Constitutional law; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Privacy by Design; Right to privacy; Section (typography); Privacy protection; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy law; Computer security; Law; Business; Computer science; Law enforcement; Human rights; Supreme court; Geography","score_opus":0.11214406541490038,"score_gpt":0.3035562360709912,"score_spread":0.1914121706560908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141118983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068114184,0.0048208167,0.011508383,0.078660324,0.0011948675,0.0009004534,0.0038046255,0.00031605992,0.83068025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7507342,0.0035828399,0.01961152,0.05322673,0.0004929812,0.0007994842,0.0012856548,0.0001205621,0.17014602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97674996,0.0024517658,0.0011419607,0.0022545313,0.009716366,0.007685509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98256934,0.0048867837,0.00077131455,0.0013854741,0.0084964605,0.0018906095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009518102,0.0005662002,0.0008720883,0.0022571718,0.017812695,0.013371665,0.0036288404,0.010487453,0.0062709274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020776434,0.0012019743,0.0011278942,0.002623519,0.01440971,0.0029035292,0.0040036347,0.00959408,0.00071258796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031819036,0.00001890588,0.0015660401,0.00005450387,0.000013068747,0.00026168395,0.004111011,0.000642005,0.00049118605,0.9626358,0.024618149,0.0055557988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017111508,0.000087490516,0.022680858,0.00092001585,0.000134117,0.00041362314,0.006130962,0.003208039,0.0017568651,0.17570376,0.78827024,0.00052293297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11962063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11962063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30271998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8679125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143034414","doi":"","title":"General Defences in Criminal Law: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Compromise; Doctrine; Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.149561597980628,"score_gpt":0.3894280440194031,"score_spread":0.2398664460387751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143034414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067094746,0.38267344,0.0020611878,0.06875537,0.0022556658,0.000026288411,0.00008543348,0.00002969346,0.5374034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44407713,0.4077168,0.002974264,0.022376105,0.0076338863,0.00022496542,0.00028509658,0.000110457484,0.11460126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653614,0.0021310465,0.00012320936,0.00021381694,0.000538004,0.00045775296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978934,0.0012771479,0.00019521709,0.00011255624,0.00030856134,0.0002131181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027040576,0.0008835049,0.0007267147,0.005965159,0.006009192,0.010553905,0.0016606948,0.006550374,0.019183457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910999,0.00035067755,0.0006049544,0.010154583,0.024386408,0.008469427,0.004751809,0.004076498,0.0019233896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006925242,0.000028634226,0.00027931077,0.00023129195,0.000003272925,0.00009481571,0.00614494,0.0001235991,0.000033539436,0.9370716,0.033195402,0.022786718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072375037,0.000021663689,0.0011950757,0.0012678228,0.0000039946276,0.00034514535,0.014266321,0.000106720305,0.00004186096,0.19313426,0.7895991,0.000010721215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011640923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012593478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019183457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013167676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035503984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095538676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143436194","doi":"10.7202/042765ar","title":"La primauté du droit. L'origine du principe et son évolution dans le contexte de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Law; Humanities; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Charter; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.00893895730900366,"score_gpt":0.2637252880007462,"score_spread":0.2547863306917425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143436194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021862477,0.036661785,0.01973538,0.053298853,0.0012162748,0.00006885004,0.00028784448,0.00007843486,0.8667902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87703764,0.014616372,0.0076345853,0.0060836882,0.0010349288,0.00016197954,0.0001389185,0.0001114039,0.09318043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476975,0.0020790386,0.00016971571,0.00078651635,0.0015721463,0.00062289956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957131,0.0023538603,0.00050773536,0.000548824,0.0005884219,0.00028808473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004692342,0.00044539012,0.0005023085,0.0020345284,0.0065388,0.015360069,0.0011464047,0.0033867145,0.0037698848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089212945,0.00041387478,0.00037427843,0.0021568646,0.043719597,0.0061591123,0.0034416954,0.0065266755,0.0007362496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023589484,0.0000011978923,0.00007243811,0.000013119869,8.701464e-7,0.000016022837,0.0013053785,0.000027212132,0.00001737646,0.996011,0.00093975285,0.0015931963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015960684,0.000023288063,0.0010973269,0.00029149014,0.000008443834,0.00016093883,0.0011933065,0.00016586875,0.00017250038,0.53379613,0.4630493,0.000025492456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06990407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07909447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011268485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012118126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13899434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146355027","doi":"","title":"'Time's Up!' Limitation Periods for Subrogated Actions in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Action (physics); Legislation; Law; Set (abstract data type); Political science; History; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02087530570022978,"score_gpt":0.2941322474249191,"score_spread":0.27325694172468934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146355027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41389683,0.01570573,0.005107935,0.07236921,0.0014192418,0.00057430775,0.0044473605,0.00032375532,0.48615554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89476264,0.003243566,0.0026637206,0.0074605155,0.00011017117,0.00010506073,0.00059343665,0.000073652474,0.09098722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99169594,0.00044106293,0.00040562736,0.0007511152,0.003462164,0.0032441139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865218,0.0028696347,0.0010648947,0.0005188759,0.005023586,0.0040012146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039115692,0.0002565046,0.0005177768,0.0023055847,0.016665641,0.008483714,0.0027175017,0.003120771,0.014971939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015992774,0.0008159928,0.0006594767,0.0032790736,0.0035051587,0.0027327805,0.0030485434,0.0045444397,0.0006917617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039143328,0.00023258901,0.077321135,0.00055930734,0.000097360025,0.0017274957,0.024705635,0.002239869,0.0024756412,0.5747065,0.16038372,0.15515932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010656633,0.00013465543,0.24895918,0.000681506,0.00017220607,0.0004703539,0.019979246,0.0034234677,0.0016231537,0.016206697,0.7078636,0.00037927902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1296064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1296064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2574173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9403646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148229429","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2012.es06","title":"Why Re-open the Debate on the Preliminary Inquiry? Some Preliminary Empirical Observations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Procedural justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Epistemology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.29031070530761666,"score_gpt":0.3755566009655907,"score_spread":0.08524589565797402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148229429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042655252,0.023059225,0.012426634,0.8828703,0.0027846764,0.00046773165,0.00023900435,0.000048737656,0.03544845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7913777,0.01873431,0.022101669,0.15637758,0.004528513,0.0010641073,0.0003300068,0.00016230937,0.0053237267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8200895,0.1361316,0.009743039,0.009989214,0.019008955,0.0050375937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30238754,0.6023563,0.019150363,0.028117606,0.043259017,0.0047291387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24382636,0.0006238103,0.0016156258,0.0037895453,0.0065259333,0.014457239,0.006853453,0.013476332,0.008869309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48109195,0.00069269945,0.0017760898,0.0054488047,0.046540093,0.039232414,0.006498239,0.017376764,0.0013500397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069221406,0.00046759105,0.013211219,0.0022324026,0.00014314537,0.00093314564,0.04356905,0.0004982371,0.00056377647,0.81760377,0.0452797,0.074805744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030703374,0.0003956284,0.024104,0.011833081,0.00018539962,0.0005462439,0.116432354,0.0016824567,0.0013228467,0.54195154,0.3010098,0.0002295963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009037789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008495062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010618322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0141902175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9324967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148442110","doi":"","title":"The Grudge Informer Case Revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03791083770159604,"score_gpt":0.28991855517750864,"score_spread":0.2520077174759126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148442110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19344552,0.013010472,0.0023847893,0.3134713,0.0020665247,0.000045759116,0.00010260954,0.0000485393,0.47542453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92200994,0.00321241,0.0003492045,0.044525422,0.0009934229,0.000019027544,0.000021707314,0.000027443546,0.028841374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920419,0.0028454391,0.00016166159,0.0007546051,0.001615299,0.0025810634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945609,0.0039993743,0.00033738412,0.00023040711,0.0004732273,0.0003987693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007586778,0.00045466732,0.00055380934,0.0018440586,0.016855579,0.00942669,0.0014292499,0.016509987,0.004099939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015000742,0.0005737656,0.0005000143,0.002346001,0.024471046,0.0052491073,0.005456166,0.014469188,0.00061209156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000562821,0.0000114062705,0.0007779584,0.000044842658,0.000009123946,0.0034347875,0.03822648,0.00016282752,0.00024700773,0.9205559,0.026714547,0.009758813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000675674,0.000055751007,0.004016144,0.0006171012,0.000059787915,0.0027760116,0.05369479,0.00029364222,0.00093568815,0.11202668,0.82534176,0.00011499918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114718765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14589691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114718765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015488335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008104211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22810203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149112291","doi":"10.7202/043613ar","title":"Réflexion sur l'assurabilité du risque environnemental au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012344724729515115,"score_gpt":0.2461448579253962,"score_spread":0.23380013319588108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149112291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50963795,0.01750368,0.004614736,0.18763018,0.0016466923,0.00013698303,0.003078423,0.00019328162,0.27555802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154472,0.007028414,0.0015021937,0.008048762,0.00009982866,0.00003707622,0.0003929207,0.000034571036,0.06740897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998212,0.00036612133,0.00005947909,0.00019047908,0.0007937772,0.00037806758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000823,0.0013289802,0.00053538696,0.00017218936,0.0068868482,0.0010684258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025013671,0.00026433283,0.00025379244,0.0012343933,0.0048041204,0.0033307709,0.001013657,0.0011347774,0.013525785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066664205,0.0002009963,0.00029479773,0.0016391043,0.0018841362,0.0010129643,0.0011333147,0.0019376572,0.0005671659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032980766,0.00020484063,0.4074425,0.0015604579,0.00026199815,0.0014874863,0.054983128,0.0030394855,0.0059507797,0.054177012,0.21097778,0.25958475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018822431,0.000118086224,0.58106875,0.0017575459,0.00018278166,0.00017255747,0.05345034,0.0018482083,0.0015447867,0.0020784852,0.3576194,0.0001402235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99195987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041621868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041621868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06910305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3019892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154168681","doi":"10.5897/ajest11.392","title":"An insight into environmental laws in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Legislation; Legislature; Environmental law; Government (linguistics); Business; Law enforcement; Public administration; Wildlife; Environmental compliance; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Law; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.005752899179285244,"score_gpt":0.2190693575810914,"score_spread":0.21331645840180616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154168681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03372654,0.043317094,0.0015424651,0.12141365,0.0024548422,0.00028377995,0.0044144406,0.00022233247,0.79262483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4028385,0.07543643,0.0044353036,0.059896853,0.00049981347,0.00019566863,0.0031871693,0.00022482137,0.4532855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523675,0.00021936976,0.00016945244,0.00029553875,0.0024281011,0.0016507386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994224,0.00077010057,0.00022971594,0.000077481265,0.003862038,0.0008366964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015943182,0.00041379983,0.00030054816,0.0053751627,0.018741624,0.009520885,0.001677324,0.0023271402,0.014356166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051541384,0.00046389454,0.0004930466,0.01162085,0.005099269,0.002292676,0.0019230548,0.0032922644,0.0010674486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019401186,0.000077925506,0.013728496,0.00042424066,0.000014356776,0.0015128902,0.023289286,0.0009062684,0.00044150496,0.41872114,0.4501698,0.09069467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025033878,0.000005281397,0.013124178,0.00028474894,0.0000069849402,0.00008936044,0.00869603,0.00020285294,0.00009232973,0.0025055602,0.9749547,0.0000353814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21645075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21645075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33162996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9088061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155956786","doi":"10.7202/1006667ar","title":"Les obstacles épistémologiques de la méthodologie juridique : l’exemple de la théorie de l’imprécision","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05425924221755957,"score_gpt":0.3403195170325136,"score_spread":0.28606027481495405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155956786","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03348896,0.008330871,0.6987075,0.045702174,0.0010066472,0.00045986933,0.00044942476,0.0002722968,0.2115822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71951544,0.0060147373,0.24008512,0.004491763,0.00074691104,0.0014455601,0.00023266519,0.00043219238,0.027035601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9394886,0.038214017,0.0023608399,0.0033991896,0.014712175,0.0018251423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270512,0.05247003,0.0030038918,0.009577919,0.0071404637,0.0007565216],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042620223,0.001143827,0.0016823572,0.0057159094,0.006922531,0.021709811,0.0037005383,0.003910573,0.008666001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07379516,0.0010845058,0.0017839201,0.005842913,0.046631202,0.017337944,0.009575178,0.009456912,0.0011047985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016440254,0.000011920399,0.00039376057,0.00013486505,0.000021543943,0.000039541384,0.008119619,0.00034473123,0.00010301023,0.98423356,0.0006732105,0.0059077297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026325268,0.000022015502,0.00060474046,0.00046280542,0.0000404364,0.00011941931,0.005846315,0.0015198238,0.0007433978,0.9191456,0.07142384,0.000045323388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029237783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029853456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99307746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011858327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016991083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22539997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156841364","doi":"10.7202/042176ar","title":"Feu la D.C.D. L'arrêt Miller et la peine de mort","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Parliament; Political science; Bill of rights; Punishment (psychology); Philosophy; Humanities; Human rights; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012967492179912433,"score_gpt":0.32300622533267637,"score_spread":0.3100387331527639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156841364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01540236,0.05307402,0.0008697956,0.61679906,0.005024933,0.00006467154,0.00027392575,0.00006249015,0.3084287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29756016,0.02360403,0.0015124312,0.19043633,0.0064910664,0.00022048858,0.00009177362,0.000068932786,0.4800148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978126,0.00047683844,0.00004181352,0.0002708272,0.0009761609,0.00042159695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979253,0.0013481866,0.00012512942,0.000058805977,0.0003674077,0.00017524623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021739823,0.00046711534,0.00040852712,0.00086187205,0.0071472204,0.0049039,0.00067342544,0.009079004,0.009997545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010173935,0.00037357066,0.00037808137,0.0005910385,0.0043213586,0.0019993512,0.0012010232,0.0075463625,0.0011705947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043056538,0.000022417595,0.0012116474,0.000091759735,0.000009332495,0.00049030484,0.0023963146,0.00009868512,0.00028446413,0.499298,0.47188982,0.024164114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018626852,0.000026074118,0.004182164,0.0003614739,0.000012367977,0.00034128848,0.0011204814,0.00013092141,0.00043740138,0.032399304,0.96093976,0.000030190162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19085114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33136484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19085114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075336383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074375262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37948054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157037176","doi":"","title":"Regulated Out of Existence: A Case Study of Ottawa's Ticket Defence Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ticket; License; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legislature; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Public administration; Service (business); Business; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.031082926429866223,"score_gpt":0.3518949880508556,"score_spread":0.3208120616209894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157037176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626319,0.0008608209,0.0005660043,0.006715284,0.00007966824,0.00022053655,0.00017732831,0.000009732699,0.028738724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830997,0.001178764,0.00069695077,0.0013395033,0.000025671816,0.00009476491,0.00008558847,0.000013804983,0.013465357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940625,0.0018357342,0.00021250511,0.0004598567,0.0011794862,0.0022499782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355906,0.0022698836,0.00084055244,0.00038813465,0.0011274114,0.0018149632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025986668,0.0005708609,0.0005505809,0.0020745904,0.03563735,0.004533237,0.0032603738,0.0052034357,0.0033690438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007102903,0.0008055899,0.0006519998,0.0038487858,0.009850628,0.0017690125,0.004712468,0.005433652,0.00028385062],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012652196,0.0005183078,0.102710925,0.00032526362,0.0000618162,0.056760237,0.7680631,0.0008637607,0.0012920289,0.03945023,0.011068374,0.01875946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016332973,0.00012160954,0.052138288,0.0003970594,0.000055229557,0.005073738,0.8692735,0.00057654624,0.0005472803,0.0009812667,0.070731014,0.00008813689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9338136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07477862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07477862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05488522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5425594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157906948","doi":"","title":"Chapitre IV. L'erreur judiciaire canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cairn.info","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.026407434378287315,"score_gpt":0.28657200963591123,"score_spread":0.26016457525762393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157906948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00998282,0.12306108,0.020227933,0.22278352,0.020751951,0.00040151592,0.0024603338,0.0005070165,0.59982383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22757189,0.10582198,0.035513844,0.07510478,0.025345394,0.0012360777,0.0026285546,0.0006529292,0.52612454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924495,0.0028418996,0.0002869962,0.0006850082,0.0029961274,0.000740359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99111146,0.005319562,0.00034888313,0.0005962881,0.0021359385,0.00048787793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053735874,0.0011137165,0.0013833051,0.0032486492,0.006512893,0.014195803,0.0021022453,0.0066004028,0.036061544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015399517,0.0004377724,0.001260754,0.0028105688,0.007215586,0.003907456,0.0027310578,0.012105506,0.009305097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007487861,0.000049233673,0.00091124396,0.00073857093,0.00005114563,0.00064235413,0.0035491406,0.0007997975,0.000505416,0.76538324,0.18533622,0.04195878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147784185,0.000021707687,0.0020758768,0.001545754,0.000008758503,0.00031704444,0.0022610342,0.00034282738,0.00034736109,0.06386807,0.9291661,0.00003070546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098973736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08201188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90102625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012433529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012118017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19679534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157995933","doi":"10.1177/1362480614568746","title":"Post-Soviet criminal justice: The persistence of distorted neo-inquisitorialism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Persistence (discontinuity); Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Power (physics); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.14566568452595377,"score_gpt":0.36233840103375586,"score_spread":0.2166727165078021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157995933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93155384,0.0022931322,0.0034817536,0.014473962,0.00008669903,0.000012875887,0.000062733365,0.00002372619,0.048011165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994166,0.00014472441,0.00011824844,0.00013984015,0.000008867212,0.0000013340102,0.000005480056,0.000001764969,0.00016313508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309725,0.0033847447,0.00042477352,0.00065696856,0.0017618224,0.00067438814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152815,0.0033369071,0.0018462498,0.0020428675,0.0009658442,0.00027998246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067202644,0.000097275006,0.00036519518,0.00096243905,0.0024185784,0.004584123,0.0005787668,0.00082746707,0.0005258534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016228028,0.00019324708,0.00015747636,0.0013640962,0.02250427,0.0030800602,0.0041978643,0.002661558,0.00008445561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011437816,0.00003123542,0.028835919,0.00010949497,0.000056706565,0.00030178964,0.07069936,0.0011428733,0.00061103085,0.8563492,0.0015206715,0.0402274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005756145,0.0001820552,0.17076482,0.00045900658,0.00006272967,0.0009669437,0.033651426,0.0028803174,0.002724438,0.7207607,0.067408435,0.00008156297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004889313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042253654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067202644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004378477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030943793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03554058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158361136","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1240","title":"Police Questioning in the Charter Era: Adjudicative versus Regulatory Rule-making and the Problem of False Confessions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Charter; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Parliament; Criminal procedure; Silence; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.06513747930688289,"score_gpt":0.3798462052119304,"score_spread":0.3147087259050475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158361136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056896478,0.036635317,0.08135238,0.70166016,0.00296387,0.00018528143,0.00013761989,0.00016260991,0.120006345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585357,0.012271617,0.029713428,0.08614669,0.004963781,0.00039824742,0.000064642394,0.00010536346,0.0078005968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8156269,0.13135609,0.006834499,0.010209064,0.03031235,0.0056610783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6278558,0.322031,0.02026688,0.011272942,0.016447771,0.0021255624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18380457,0.00050287857,0.002014571,0.0044130767,0.007310238,0.032395985,0.0057944725,0.025927704,0.0014741914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2750928,0.0012908808,0.0014544098,0.0030771818,0.058934133,0.020617401,0.005762309,0.023341969,0.0005650319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031485957,0.000029246941,0.00076268584,0.00009379232,0.000017130114,0.0002587803,0.0043411604,0.0004553004,0.00019989915,0.9680544,0.008282387,0.017473793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013771384,0.0001194741,0.002860899,0.001319562,0.00009240813,0.00036973864,0.003996795,0.003786456,0.0016053969,0.88675535,0.098740496,0.00021573741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01413831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012331099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18380457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010308256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016591117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9720631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158441135","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n4p13","title":"Adversary System Experiment in Continental Europe: Several Lessons from the Italian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adversary; Constitution; Legislature; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Democratic system; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.05062946448162339,"score_gpt":0.3336311601023473,"score_spread":0.28300169562072386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158441135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30490142,0.008976398,0.0018785824,0.02833804,0.00027434318,0.00004762026,0.00016353853,0.00006598813,0.6553541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673391,0.0024826077,0.0006677402,0.007027055,0.0003072907,0.000036936704,0.00012620016,0.00006791685,0.021945084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996223,0.002220977,0.000083374645,0.000367202,0.00031630803,0.0007892109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844164,0.0008301704,0.00013176813,0.0003004704,0.00011849912,0.00017744026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007021114,0.0003888621,0.0005931253,0.0015919836,0.00673325,0.0088185165,0.0011227519,0.0031804317,0.0069823386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045846994,0.00023287282,0.0006545403,0.0023940222,0.011132071,0.0037326673,0.0049837474,0.0032320481,0.00080424413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004239008,0.00034191128,0.021433314,0.00019234905,0.000120221644,0.0027520927,0.12046253,0.0010945216,0.00036132146,0.7743234,0.03235901,0.04613531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001984561,0.00024523216,0.06719548,0.0006896587,0.00010327886,0.001096146,0.054123737,0.00073687517,0.0007010592,0.06772856,0.8070829,0.000098664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03183739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032012813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03183739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004938878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014576529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063304186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159621412","doi":"","title":"R. v. Jones (1703): The Origins of the \"Reasonable Person\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Prudence; Reasonable person; Tort; Criminal law; Jury; Normative; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.04864294311384755,"score_gpt":0.29972673633766833,"score_spread":0.2510837932238208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159621412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030172328,0.014604211,0.009960028,0.1239743,0.00171293,0.00009157578,0.00023699614,0.000102765895,0.8191448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6871325,0.0080413595,0.005951279,0.104227036,0.0015674393,0.00026667747,0.00010795295,0.00014038796,0.19256532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995295,0.0011897264,0.00019635644,0.00064152287,0.0017801021,0.00089728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988919,0.0003788284,0.00015488232,0.00007687072,0.00036117114,0.00013639865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032980242,0.0003739273,0.00035150713,0.0007379681,0.006982203,0.0056050937,0.000939549,0.009023566,0.0018628698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005941576,0.00048114016,0.00045972114,0.0009493568,0.017835861,0.003889731,0.0025283946,0.009205163,0.00092189596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050998437,0.0000025883378,0.00011249046,0.000007461578,0.0000013355285,0.00007076527,0.0024905335,0.00003549364,0.000047698322,0.9799129,0.014694837,0.00261882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019202462,0.000030102787,0.0018423336,0.00014651987,0.000012254032,0.00042591494,0.0018412156,0.00018020155,0.0005152132,0.3268721,0.6680501,0.000064871136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25207478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2008723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25207478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013902431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01503339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5012151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160063269","doi":"","title":"Truth Before Punishment: A Defence of Public Inquiries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE Research Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Politics; Witness; Punishment (psychology); Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.3971708471475116,"score_gpt":0.5188976835012524,"score_spread":0.12172683635374082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160063269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013697345,0.008310913,0.093083814,0.41082254,0.0029198348,0.0005408019,0.00013199158,0.00021666018,0.4702761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.824116,0.0030768716,0.025724951,0.089936174,0.0032602856,0.00089268875,0.000058090558,0.00018536506,0.05274968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9320506,0.032905646,0.0029929983,0.005739218,0.020863026,0.0054485295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8388068,0.120214924,0.0082385605,0.015419696,0.014824857,0.0024951885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07812299,0.0011382928,0.0018957405,0.0036509668,0.013978709,0.022697657,0.005840033,0.04357107,0.00474198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14877881,0.0013258392,0.002329463,0.002816419,0.086996526,0.017661298,0.01325277,0.043616977,0.0011351234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013963352,0.0000055054516,0.00007917396,0.00005342281,0.000010230636,0.00010393415,0.0031231064,0.00011980982,0.000041703686,0.98996276,0.0038176705,0.002668629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008969782,0.000036057758,0.00025524572,0.0005081452,0.000053860465,0.00019867999,0.002005559,0.0011023004,0.0003812939,0.872422,0.12289166,0.00005559509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05302131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044877082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07812299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02205251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038930614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41315877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161677596","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1045","title":"Between Here and There is Better Than Anything Over There: The Morass of Sauvé V. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Chief executive officer; Political science; Management; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.036028208413606586,"score_gpt":0.30564712146575795,"score_spread":0.26961891305215135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161677596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01985019,0.16536468,0.00076022855,0.71174717,0.0049783792,0.00004030355,0.00065495435,0.000029273398,0.096574865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43361807,0.06881492,0.0012015826,0.42946646,0.0025300821,0.0000245303,0.00034229198,0.0000600425,0.06394201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751174,0.00045809735,0.00006249856,0.00026213547,0.001174067,0.0005314922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781823,0.00083229854,0.00011933722,0.00003417051,0.00082998874,0.00036599018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027826803,0.00039603835,0.00035222934,0.0015313048,0.015117958,0.005103795,0.0015185716,0.0056501348,0.0025254355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077717686,0.00027135713,0.00025819344,0.0023287714,0.006063525,0.0022378073,0.0012184543,0.007110062,0.0003548803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008533543,0.000023046596,0.004419072,0.00040724827,0.000053542182,0.001406087,0.008923907,0.000112572954,0.00031992898,0.12117288,0.81714857,0.04592783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004789196,0.000033193035,0.020202445,0.0014227957,0.00014044988,0.0006435328,0.019336896,0.00021575455,0.0007736643,0.030942218,0.92613477,0.00010628965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95184803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04815197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022195028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058021493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16103697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161752717","doi":"10.1017/s0008197302001551","title":"Digging the Dirt: Disclosure of Records in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Attendance; Anonymity; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Law; Section (typography); Psychology; Sexual violence; Poison control; Medicine; History; Suicide prevention; Business; Medical emergency; Advertising","score_opus":0.06966465143572685,"score_gpt":0.3151801492568423,"score_spread":0.24551549782111542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161752717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54016805,0.01682473,0.0071993517,0.26028123,0.0010970557,0.00018471373,0.00018331203,0.000041514257,0.17402005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96713114,0.0070284796,0.0021284502,0.017575355,0.0005589382,0.000057765395,0.000049742346,0.0000101206815,0.005460113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700962,0.018091107,0.0021904367,0.0008808304,0.0052207834,0.0035206561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353421,0.05130166,0.0069734394,0.0023238778,0.002472887,0.0015860518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03129231,0.00021195326,0.0005460849,0.003269054,0.006166715,0.008199263,0.0021595026,0.015288492,0.002334735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10800028,0.00077313144,0.0005422193,0.0032519763,0.014708255,0.013013482,0.008159756,0.008814008,0.00029780084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002489963,0.00014363519,0.03510204,0.00057335466,0.000045723566,0.015252942,0.11583988,0.00056867197,0.00080439175,0.7474544,0.015733596,0.06823244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029053394,0.0010861473,0.11726148,0.009681002,0.0004959361,0.037004977,0.24747428,0.003107007,0.0065335585,0.29999217,0.27644283,0.0006301366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03287527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07660334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03287527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005420806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123765785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16549152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164156301","doi":"","title":"Alternative Models of Court Administration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Accountability; Administration (probate law); Separation of powers; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Safeguarding; Administrative law; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Business; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.024429410764240513,"score_gpt":0.3175647037899948,"score_spread":0.2931352930257543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164156301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017126864,0.0016527516,0.10395193,0.016102139,0.00031885688,0.00027244052,0.00031364086,0.00023921371,0.8600222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8848656,0.0020809118,0.041706067,0.002322924,0.0004256924,0.00053377246,0.0003910048,0.0001110681,0.06756296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97416216,0.010969088,0.0010196136,0.0025563994,0.007693784,0.0035989108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98628354,0.004338143,0.0011443646,0.0025707218,0.0041385572,0.0015245795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01129428,0.00085308595,0.0006628743,0.0037652366,0.0065739146,0.021822842,0.003493473,0.005075597,0.01839433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017643586,0.0007105038,0.0018675544,0.0041217073,0.017728059,0.012829582,0.004631668,0.0038178584,0.002977615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027577084,0.0000049912137,0.0001088094,0.0000059964286,0.0000020497575,0.000009400836,0.00031080775,0.00040005444,0.000008240939,0.99768424,0.00053639035,0.0009262344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056291196,0.00003081681,0.0007020545,0.00013948079,0.000019346375,0.0000923147,0.0015382044,0.010554958,0.00007794812,0.89025086,0.09649654,0.00004116703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07800711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094302565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07800711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023295302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022740673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20065081271940535,"score_gpt":0.4318830265874217,"score_spread":0.23123221386801637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166165129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30447504,0.051787615,0.0052268594,0.3454032,0.0023223662,0.00051415345,0.00026865822,0.0000512544,0.28995082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93886554,0.013126181,0.0035871312,0.028186833,0.00044042672,0.000086866465,0.000044773824,0.000033235534,0.01562904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694244,0.0073634796,0.0017228745,0.0018970065,0.013849879,0.005742362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89905494,0.061017785,0.0024830196,0.0014139417,0.033561967,0.0024683464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04531685,0.0006195504,0.0010295013,0.009218454,0.06537222,0.017970031,0.005532588,0.009001893,0.0017273994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10992273,0.00092288636,0.00077388884,0.009308024,0.04730463,0.006330772,0.0067470153,0.012985755,0.000153481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006435614,0.000027873615,0.00572787,0.00067671225,0.00004820508,0.0031631954,0.48829117,0.00036815408,0.00061926275,0.4388198,0.02941614,0.032777313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006099361,0.00005252861,0.022417465,0.003787754,0.00034279132,0.00097339106,0.4242629,0.0011834914,0.0016683245,0.081473306,0.46332964,0.000447416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97798425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15636638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15636638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26803875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167628134","doi":"10.7202/017370ar","title":"La détention provisoire au Québec : éléments de connaissance et propositions de réflexions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Warrant; Harm; Political science; Law; Criminology; Remand (court procedure); Psychology; Supreme court; Business","score_opus":0.31942012997526076,"score_gpt":0.47439129890022974,"score_spread":0.15497116892496898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167628134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.185628,0.051863793,0.011453668,0.49094796,0.0038754852,0.00028793045,0.00073852006,0.00011374922,0.2550908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624492,0.005581437,0.0029129388,0.016639361,0.0010538673,0.00012479794,0.00009046081,0.000030513656,0.011117488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97115344,0.016553164,0.001527947,0.0026148583,0.005620095,0.0025304612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79000187,0.17043784,0.0066511496,0.0036701548,0.027225919,0.0020130284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046564374,0.00089128595,0.001075865,0.0072832215,0.013259849,0.023355344,0.004338067,0.009084015,0.0061028353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10736644,0.00066427636,0.00079340243,0.0067977407,0.051098097,0.00943329,0.004695775,0.00901658,0.000355413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016427835,0.00009584401,0.014953764,0.0005974789,0.00017335919,0.0009392476,0.09286869,0.00079437817,0.00026350655,0.8464903,0.012566682,0.030092448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001654523,0.00015866372,0.073417544,0.007395711,0.00032361317,0.0005942238,0.32488653,0.0049962103,0.0013192832,0.36874196,0.21759105,0.0004097359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86020535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8213194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13979465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086442806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05697699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6271894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169189483","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.2.107","title":"Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Publicity; Legislation; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Salience (neuroscience); Prison; Subject (documents); Psychology","score_opus":0.1141885114976563,"score_gpt":0.3546432759040277,"score_spread":0.24045476440637142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169189483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80591965,0.010638296,0.00045804924,0.10828112,0.0009273599,0.000033068056,0.00011615349,0.000041023493,0.07358528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96547645,0.00928911,0.00011305229,0.017140476,0.0001758616,0.000017758679,0.00004777768,0.00002942038,0.007710159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996867,0.0013325737,0.00010751125,0.00015959598,0.00061345904,0.0009198429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917143,0.0020277072,0.0010037512,0.0003623005,0.0014476177,0.0034443685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034341738,0.00027042013,0.0005252265,0.0009116651,0.016627979,0.0052425903,0.0010241244,0.003079043,0.004969372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01250076,0.0004100591,0.00025370633,0.001955585,0.008226323,0.0032070973,0.004764685,0.007003905,0.0006203283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013450139,0.00068645994,0.11945893,0.000202642,0.00004603822,0.016648939,0.6100035,0.00015991395,0.0005425265,0.037168074,0.09511379,0.11983472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018610846,0.000154552,0.06370576,0.00086062873,0.00004082037,0.012607661,0.5555019,0.00024274313,0.00023288255,0.0072070966,0.35931218,0.00011521158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06928637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1560651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06928637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040519894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007888505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13776618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170895668","doi":"10.7202/043854ar","title":"Fragilité et résistance des codes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0217466793427643,"score_gpt":0.29739815697943023,"score_spread":0.2756514776366659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170895668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32100394,0.0031214731,0.03062087,0.047324702,0.00048204086,0.00019050646,0.00040479025,0.00023551195,0.59661615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711549,0.0005297485,0.0030148216,0.0010866221,0.000109324894,0.00009362886,0.00010742058,0.00007305326,0.023830412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9675422,0.0129786795,0.001347512,0.0027095086,0.011374389,0.004047715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478261,0.01996688,0.010454502,0.006398826,0.012515825,0.0028378537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014836004,0.00050472765,0.0006158668,0.0058559035,0.011245452,0.011337717,0.0018042602,0.0032759334,0.010803395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0683945,0.00052587973,0.0005099324,0.004372538,0.053675648,0.008397046,0.009201807,0.0064025465,0.001020686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026294512,0.000010236764,0.0038888182,0.0000503425,0.000014192551,0.00015208905,0.0397462,0.0002790381,0.00037670627,0.9367926,0.0031072595,0.01555621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046260087,0.00012641215,0.033274293,0.00078039855,0.000050053146,0.0008633045,0.059028655,0.0021574968,0.0021135788,0.5651163,0.3362598,0.0001834458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05281196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047067787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05281196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016781477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009989581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1217587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171747972","doi":"","title":"The Responsibility Crisis in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Audit; Economic Justice; Responsible government; Public service; Accounting; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.030217115693439062,"score_gpt":0.31086380568503946,"score_spread":0.2806466899916004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171747972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05430842,0.1802185,0.0005488544,0.59164745,0.0047061346,0.00015791804,0.0014610763,0.000066683555,0.16688503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64652413,0.12449594,0.0010633838,0.16674721,0.0012273901,0.00012850433,0.00095464115,0.00010324509,0.058755603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837082,0.0013996512,0.00052639033,0.00094447355,0.009817652,0.0036036132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713463,0.0047866786,0.0012726928,0.00062460755,0.017110268,0.004859504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010593269,0.00039238352,0.0009342582,0.004972665,0.019786024,0.011680635,0.0021940868,0.005905655,0.005258195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034623507,0.00063553156,0.0006811964,0.007972491,0.008009069,0.0029401053,0.0036952975,0.0066413675,0.0003668285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017265843,0.000072212286,0.011667197,0.0015491954,0.00015419295,0.001650208,0.010816388,0.000902007,0.00047880496,0.3571261,0.5022588,0.113152154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007663087,0.00003682671,0.034063622,0.0014566082,0.0001240261,0.0002598738,0.0070823566,0.0003274066,0.0004113011,0.017811686,0.9382139,0.00013570943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99751234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7581511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24184889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.54113257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8793478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174084167","doi":"10.71781/2497","title":"Les valeurs afférentes à la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés dans le discours judiciaire : utilisations et sources","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.016222618040542293,"score_gpt":0.22831435031205594,"score_spread":0.21209173227151365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174084167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095616676,0.02075468,0.014907062,0.03762157,0.0011155676,0.00005269423,0.00056775927,0.00010861223,0.82925534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130809,0.009230213,0.0034397824,0.0021162257,0.00063344947,0.000065237386,0.00016600762,0.00015782022,0.07111036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497026,0.0019026035,0.00019343759,0.0005075542,0.0019565057,0.00046970538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98740447,0.007343464,0.00102328,0.0007889834,0.0028716996,0.00056818966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039795116,0.0007099011,0.00052548037,0.006336822,0.0075761727,0.016697234,0.00109543,0.002499752,0.010939133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014764958,0.0005075746,0.00041343353,0.009979324,0.016511986,0.004933613,0.005665485,0.005572358,0.0010863463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003156777,0.000010884567,0.0036444468,0.00020921182,0.000018482124,0.00027951988,0.087719835,0.00016739164,0.000350751,0.87505573,0.0055651525,0.026946979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026048723,0.00005142515,0.0258586,0.0023235546,0.00007223842,0.0006478404,0.07824047,0.00057592505,0.0010066022,0.27367276,0.6173739,0.0001507588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042860165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07067276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95713985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012254705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008682057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08891451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174934790","doi":"10.29173/alr280","title":"Criminalizing Terrorist Babble: Canada's Dubious New Terrorist Speech Crime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07912889308926983,"score_gpt":0.34827155983299,"score_spread":0.26914266674372017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174934790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37308928,0.00669735,0.0030883292,0.17255126,0.001914961,0.00018153393,0.0010986084,0.00023889304,0.44113976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8037628,0.0038386625,0.0017526909,0.0252444,0.00020772064,0.000035503752,0.00028474344,0.00009164484,0.1647819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970162,0.00020050243,0.00004735855,0.00023888447,0.0016281661,0.0008689749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960367,0.0007827328,0.00024234834,0.00022746294,0.0016052081,0.0011055256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001310743,0.0003785713,0.00021420367,0.0009992636,0.019904086,0.006180664,0.0010604626,0.0027259444,0.005177512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005941145,0.00029907725,0.00035911164,0.0010477453,0.0067660394,0.0018321554,0.0018082907,0.0048711374,0.0004495228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016979809,0.00009818195,0.025090355,0.00025246837,0.000038020382,0.0025283622,0.07340979,0.00074490823,0.0023778258,0.34019947,0.4008904,0.15420042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030260442,0.000059194088,0.04995865,0.00033093948,0.0000645436,0.00113105,0.04331274,0.000928964,0.0020697066,0.0056348303,0.8963182,0.00016086173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99195576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99766314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05294635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05294635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116386496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38415444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179414445","doi":"","title":"The Legacy of Justice Louis Lebel: The Civilian Tradition and Procedural Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03395930859637696,"score_gpt":0.30747211115176015,"score_spread":0.2735128025553832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179414445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028935943,0.051535424,0.002451531,0.8003289,0.0025427327,0.00000910944,0.00006339374,0.000032565276,0.1141005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069895,0.018823056,0.0017035326,0.104267985,0.0066617625,0.000024061701,0.000034130964,0.000117729636,0.06137822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955882,0.0026635162,0.00009854503,0.0005078024,0.00067510235,0.00046697014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887651,0.008448383,0.0006517347,0.00040085713,0.0010516522,0.0006823369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007575811,0.00030167607,0.00037392176,0.0018451596,0.009832307,0.011921187,0.0010274275,0.009001416,0.0044791005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016257575,0.00025166597,0.00018933015,0.001606326,0.03129086,0.007940488,0.0033380792,0.011959711,0.00045545655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019544173,0.000016143338,0.00043707664,0.0000254513,0.0000044017124,0.00007018849,0.004177117,0.00006522688,0.00003568134,0.95976585,0.02585829,0.009525079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019478082,0.000019175224,0.0011492298,0.0005426561,0.000007948573,0.00010265095,0.0058867233,0.00031048286,0.0002541927,0.5522995,0.4393699,0.00003807028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033118173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05904737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033118173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007942084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009705694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065850854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181301847","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.55","title":"The Right to a Fair Fight","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Harm; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Deadly force; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04345892375559509,"score_gpt":0.3566706915972829,"score_spread":0.3132117678416878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181301847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025721354,0.109166175,0.009448115,0.08210673,0.0027077035,0.00012767916,0.00017110797,0.000036878464,0.7705142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114133,0.06585472,0.0050384263,0.04715124,0.0023848463,0.00028271688,0.00018901416,0.00003107723,0.06765471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98416406,0.006722311,0.0009934283,0.0014167054,0.0053577763,0.0013457327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888916,0.0072111986,0.0013274623,0.00082796894,0.0012181642,0.0005236681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010450583,0.00036181143,0.0009086425,0.0017235038,0.0030390339,0.0045163333,0.0017829788,0.0056285677,0.008295618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026377412,0.00034813763,0.0005286424,0.0008529168,0.017794635,0.0054781158,0.004526906,0.00435973,0.001507786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024228604,0.000039955055,0.0009207476,0.00036210284,0.000015653295,0.00017532223,0.0015446878,0.00015979263,0.00016729109,0.94689554,0.009081547,0.04061311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004260372,0.00017177063,0.006692638,0.0042615524,0.000056801848,0.0008942711,0.0030983386,0.00012445878,0.0005053056,0.32989436,0.65420324,0.000054609445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067710914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010695649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010450583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014431607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077181435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055268645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181630519","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1046","title":"Re-Constructing the Work of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal: First Steps to a Fairer Process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Process (computing); Rental housing; Renting; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Sociology; Process management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.06177985682178997,"score_gpt":0.3334350345422878,"score_spread":0.2716551777204978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181630519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14794399,0.010275813,0.031613547,0.15727782,0.0021131905,0.00095813634,0.00031378603,0.00023865461,0.64926505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77433807,0.0035062684,0.014394816,0.004515737,0.00021542213,0.00020628342,0.0001192905,0.00019268373,0.20251136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358106,0.0023126677,0.0001970189,0.0006035141,0.0019347419,0.001370997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389946,0.0015318152,0.00030789108,0.000648878,0.0025141167,0.0010978132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662385,0.00047886657,0.00036844175,0.0019060042,0.02863869,0.013279942,0.0030472353,0.003687266,0.011027878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014492863,0.0005339205,0.00038448483,0.001955331,0.029198121,0.0055748187,0.007519205,0.003631034,0.0012007075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003376712,0.00003389999,0.0044299983,0.00019402812,0.000009573802,0.0009696805,0.3586024,0.00064425275,0.0008710465,0.5085931,0.062401082,0.0632172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000741441,0.000016158921,0.0055841086,0.00034895836,0.000010308978,0.000105667474,0.18596856,0.0003690156,0.00032099054,0.017087223,0.790143,0.000038617785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90447336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.966212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11147187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11147187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15567516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8087888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182806550","doi":"10.1089/elj.2008.0028","title":"Regulating Canadian Elections in the Digital Age: Approaches and Concerns","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Download; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05895455357080293,"score_gpt":0.33713673323906207,"score_spread":0.27818217966825914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182806550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059470836,0.03409232,0.0058611943,0.45055076,0.0018279899,0.00018703868,0.0005788698,0.0001265798,0.44730446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8750475,0.016756713,0.005200169,0.054295477,0.001305085,0.00014064772,0.00020478787,0.00006870913,0.04698098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784605,0.0034635202,0.00047720192,0.0012702245,0.008335569,0.007993054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557326,0.014763242,0.001446521,0.0014112745,0.02169021,0.0049562934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02281495,0.0006990683,0.0007681019,0.009702189,0.026694696,0.031372543,0.005672062,0.007248774,0.0086845495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03888985,0.0005125722,0.0009251067,0.009852475,0.023527011,0.008434135,0.0059976485,0.0073044687,0.0006442917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058475405,0.00007558062,0.012315187,0.0003839249,0.00006034416,0.0002559243,0.009689823,0.0016051581,0.00033595855,0.7981285,0.079226345,0.09786477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060302365,0.0000510059,0.030247955,0.0018914393,0.0001837848,0.00019523827,0.04439655,0.0025319466,0.0013109884,0.16160938,0.7572548,0.00026663576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15431273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15431273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22099023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98087734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183938297","doi":"","title":"The Exclusionary Rule in Canada: Trends and Future Directions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00674528226926408,"score_gpt":0.21095836243468527,"score_spread":0.2042130801654212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183938297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35982853,0.17213717,0.0014030903,0.33402634,0.0017205563,0.0001769814,0.021844363,0.00027267076,0.10859029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8255221,0.11326218,0.0020716563,0.021167096,0.00075195427,0.00008735355,0.006394693,0.0001903791,0.03055263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918321,0.0003838458,0.00045673482,0.0007580501,0.0029065378,0.003662784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578375,0.0033747915,0.004396953,0.00058376434,0.024598619,0.009208406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003747574,0.0004614209,0.0016647554,0.0084949965,0.011208319,0.011533661,0.004406503,0.0027752419,0.014421735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018008867,0.00052000995,0.0009970365,0.029196115,0.006642142,0.003781166,0.003090835,0.005747562,0.00096507894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006411224,0.00035491944,0.32049108,0.0026599076,0.00031082024,0.00083798775,0.013793988,0.0015641527,0.00050550746,0.06851959,0.21651565,0.3738053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008025854,0.00009844968,0.7134669,0.0028006,0.00019447933,0.00037285354,0.024949765,0.0013637077,0.00035453885,0.007372894,0.24866836,0.00027711442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16032088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16032088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3999399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184374928","doi":"","title":"Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Plaintiff; Complaint; Service (business); Credibility; Freedom of information; Law; Law enforcement; Business; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Conviction; Political science; Information privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.034874594703694556,"score_gpt":0.2925480181742436,"score_spread":0.257673423470549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184374928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026576146,0.008795152,0.000862793,0.03211259,0.007626836,0.0005821826,0.004323108,0.000762356,0.94227743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044334373,0.0017145246,0.0005790735,0.0038774207,0.0003435625,0.00009690182,0.00060467777,0.0001066639,0.9882437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893606,0.0006315608,0.00036339185,0.0013366324,0.006590008,0.001717964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98016584,0.0023167485,0.0007561189,0.0012348737,0.011586352,0.003940073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004694933,0.0008760794,0.0010430013,0.0028926078,0.007902542,0.012509593,0.0023106623,0.005880676,0.27878687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019220412,0.0009724165,0.0003290799,0.002468631,0.001759472,0.0024621517,0.0024875351,0.0040687113,0.09724626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006138116,0.00003603295,0.00087833643,0.0001253901,0.0000049614655,0.0004141583,0.00020320725,0.00005805619,0.00030234194,0.022838445,0.9206254,0.0544523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009479433,0.00000834557,0.0014566451,0.00011579502,0.00000414106,0.00007556102,0.00014628873,0.000055307682,0.00013365563,0.000574473,0.9974068,0.000013463101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3886965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49985614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6113035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013976028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090888835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187441579","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p277","title":"Standardization and Development: Brief Discussion on Chinese Quick Transaction Mechanism of Minor Criminal Case","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Minor (academic); Criminal procedure; Political science; Suspect; Database transaction; Criminal justice; Computer science","score_opus":0.043047806521127864,"score_gpt":0.3350958529672758,"score_spread":0.2920480464461479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187441579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07797179,0.15453272,0.07594438,0.09952566,0.00884386,0.0024639294,0.00065662747,0.0005820765,0.579479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44983,0.21591367,0.04572627,0.021770572,0.008837595,0.0020206675,0.0016618663,0.0001972866,0.25404197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995365,0.0008331274,0.00062572194,0.00066175614,0.0019462554,0.00056823133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800164,0.0004317001,0.00023487696,0.00022678378,0.00091357704,0.00019145141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067121875,0.00063402543,0.00042318588,0.0052306997,0.0032376691,0.0056974026,0.0023147296,0.0031026953,0.008211721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056366143,0.0005222281,0.0012798468,0.005424805,0.0038810188,0.008012259,0.003046036,0.0024841474,0.001086982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038259892,0.00009612447,0.009916474,0.0015707775,0.000023347933,0.0018095729,0.005140945,0.0010149917,0.0014131276,0.7141581,0.04586528,0.21895286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031646163,0.00020142947,0.025724482,0.0012450744,0.000070872105,0.0027474244,0.0040148934,0.0031716577,0.0019586538,0.0629451,0.897761,0.0001277495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035676174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014669781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035676174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076780138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016704429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07093704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188622380","doi":"","title":"The Etobicoke York Community Council enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, is amended as follows: A. By inserting in Schedule XXIII (Prohibited Turns) in § 950-1322, the following in","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Schedule; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Operations research; Transport engineering; Computer science; Programming language; Operating system","score_opus":0.07663790383458777,"score_gpt":0.31157416352792366,"score_spread":0.2349362596933359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188622380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012094897,0.0017937011,0.0014070813,0.058961157,0.008388819,0.00078318856,0.01957299,0.0006441959,0.8963539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011492868,0.00028907356,0.00059563795,0.01294448,0.00026055492,0.00031437285,0.0019904366,0.00009392759,0.9720187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975604,0.00014631964,0.00010362208,0.00026872754,0.0013479501,0.00057310227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557024,0.00074663624,0.00013334579,0.00021511306,0.0027715638,0.00056311995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016811298,0.0005910047,0.00047573823,0.0009696872,0.007387854,0.004943949,0.00171373,0.009068761,0.09402988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071199113,0.0009010762,0.0003622779,0.0011160711,0.0016544162,0.0016128808,0.0021798073,0.008664408,0.045465812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003099704,0.000040902905,0.00079743034,0.00004323942,0.0000021398769,0.00005949193,0.00033883518,0.000034482546,0.00024475902,0.014359251,0.97924864,0.004799801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025309198,0.0000133260255,0.004663962,0.0000875293,0.000007106061,0.00001808546,0.0005480994,0.00009209096,0.00031178075,0.0008680492,0.993345,0.000019524747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.590668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82841015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40933198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072516263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029803952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82348526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191046006","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Original (Non-Delegated) Provincial Jurisdiction to Prosecute Criminal Offences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Business; Law; Criminal law; Criminal jurisdiction; Political science","score_opus":0.014253426626739335,"score_gpt":0.2948680790768284,"score_spread":0.28061465245008904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191046006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68414277,0.00037487477,0.0063986615,0.00898799,0.00036334313,0.0010281026,0.0006796318,0.00026107207,0.2977636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96576935,0.00019592061,0.00515515,0.0013149718,0.000040687184,0.000085645835,0.0002090969,0.000040151812,0.027189163],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344516,0.0006607078,0.000360007,0.00066311157,0.0026604442,0.0022105153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833106,0.0031166398,0.0011997505,0.0018551246,0.008917013,0.0016008547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050355187,0.00018753778,0.00057038316,0.0014420775,0.005484942,0.0039300593,0.002532402,0.001914941,0.009793277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0386574,0.00036312782,0.0004797205,0.0011741823,0.0014716814,0.0012206621,0.003182305,0.0027295467,0.0020699843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00160901,0.001105177,0.32889977,0.0010679001,0.00023928062,0.004609687,0.037146788,0.0033320868,0.028642956,0.08376418,0.1076842,0.40189886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050526607,0.00097653933,0.5397,0.00090841064,0.0009464714,0.0060340515,0.038812276,0.024868207,0.05691855,0.039656863,0.29037535,0.00029799886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44513056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7616913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008318814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04097376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8850792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191580116","doi":"","title":"The Relevance of Delayed Disclosure to Complainant Credibility in Cases of Sexual Offence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Complaint; Credibility; Relevance (law); Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.0618151556740623,"score_gpt":0.319511505385235,"score_spread":0.25769634971117267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191580116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4572691,0.04621014,0.015561294,0.2696794,0.0014244193,0.0002170573,0.000095973235,0.000052305346,0.20949033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911221,0.0023908932,0.0007626832,0.0044265795,0.0004904999,0.000024106876,0.000008627436,0.000005519316,0.0007690811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9552651,0.026366904,0.005123701,0.0025502162,0.0074558444,0.0032382542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6169064,0.33870873,0.023836505,0.008059972,0.009646044,0.0028422691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04300845,0.000208108,0.0006004583,0.0034436076,0.0038860121,0.009487766,0.003929809,0.017703043,0.0024689892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31543317,0.000708502,0.00091465854,0.0018639952,0.024454774,0.013524838,0.006131132,0.013173536,0.0001956581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086362887,0.00020006303,0.05198216,0.0011396155,0.00012761488,0.03746751,0.07822058,0.0021631303,0.0010271581,0.6979289,0.0115516,0.11732795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004096899,0.00090724457,0.06221997,0.0061446773,0.0005279148,0.044827,0.061276697,0.009079278,0.004051069,0.7385212,0.07160945,0.00042582364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008019273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010528788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04300845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005774933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068994095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22745311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201014884","doi":"","title":"A Short Note on Plea Agreements in Canadian Antitrust Cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.06266646806627628,"score_gpt":0.37539624624546875,"score_spread":0.31272977817919245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201014884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013123722,0.031551894,0.0070357714,0.5330512,0.01881921,0.000364122,0.0035261216,0.00044194248,0.392086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.222393,0.035898995,0.015979514,0.31487826,0.010283402,0.00042557126,0.002054237,0.00043871786,0.39764822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860774,0.0013406354,0.0007858676,0.001331335,0.006935863,0.0035288325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755955,0.011242722,0.00075220474,0.0006660546,0.010295352,0.0014481907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076163355,0.00081996183,0.0007972661,0.004125326,0.02419189,0.0124123,0.003513354,0.014707869,0.013158612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030502794,0.0010184171,0.0019739817,0.0076051354,0.0072767083,0.005376731,0.0025449453,0.014369153,0.0026756602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004393547,0.000035877623,0.002351509,0.00016868484,0.000021973821,0.00067851593,0.0020364816,0.0004306802,0.00050654873,0.18392737,0.7818823,0.027916081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034322795,0.000038364076,0.020082066,0.0005617461,0.000057431203,0.000286434,0.0028907803,0.0006237455,0.00057319197,0.018053513,0.9565012,0.0002972602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068157546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068157546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09151175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49451995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201423329","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adversary; Criminal justice; Law; Identification (biology); Political science; Psychology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.012924781916645959,"score_gpt":0.30627195417558384,"score_spread":0.29334717225893786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201423329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5615709,0.011631548,0.02063305,0.18773474,0.0009005421,0.0001426077,0.00006281082,0.00007151513,0.21725228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247664,0.0011829664,0.0005638974,0.0028107348,0.00016086946,0.000021781321,0.000006999622,0.000009609421,0.0027665065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864537,0.008321897,0.0005302032,0.00079121743,0.0019432278,0.00195967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97527903,0.01638845,0.0034147238,0.0013489579,0.0020932688,0.0014754718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019739665,0.0003366916,0.00035429565,0.0032472007,0.014059146,0.009570113,0.0023713808,0.003444894,0.0017383994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030134782,0.00039388976,0.00034241713,0.0014766199,0.056404244,0.0072565204,0.011660417,0.008449976,0.00016391953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020203208,0.00005753657,0.008423325,0.00011076988,0.00001622511,0.0011428373,0.27784085,0.00030720208,0.00013881642,0.6900967,0.003992042,0.0178536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013682081,0.000073239964,0.024173595,0.0011821053,0.000037421196,0.0018678284,0.50078875,0.0019386729,0.00084790477,0.35609713,0.1128652,0.0001144535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012383668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011009084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019739665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009167071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006904332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104394615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202211952","doi":"","title":"The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Too Strong, Too Weak, or Both?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Interpretation (philosophy); Reinterpretation; Cross-examination; Law; Section (typography); Privilege (computing); Admissible evidence; Political science; Charter; Self-incrimination; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01966456986191412,"score_gpt":0.310651484683745,"score_spread":0.29098691482183087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202211952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010337673,0.0172496,0.0075754463,0.7987555,0.0072537367,0.000036573416,0.000066485736,0.00008049855,0.15864451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50073284,0.008783726,0.006366276,0.44222587,0.012002398,0.00015581699,0.00005078097,0.00016768792,0.029514574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715578,0.015488904,0.0012730556,0.0020970209,0.00648563,0.0030976122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436688,0.041888203,0.0035851079,0.003654831,0.0045342795,0.0026688084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025898762,0.00063511287,0.001110525,0.0013263406,0.004999475,0.019753825,0.0031736903,0.019002635,0.0033108564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07386033,0.00057407556,0.00083234115,0.0011525836,0.04622178,0.01826453,0.004810775,0.019676538,0.0016015344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024560213,0.000017357152,0.00065083866,0.000077005265,0.000008672681,0.00009497299,0.002624787,0.000047314512,0.00014157778,0.9372342,0.041706014,0.017372655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040513598,0.00006732915,0.0010048565,0.0008500398,0.000050848696,0.0003066107,0.0054642246,0.00032209192,0.0005157918,0.7725808,0.21871021,0.00008672799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010331293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013364778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025898762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051074014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012877403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13696742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202648162","doi":"","title":"Standards of Suspicion","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Enforcement; Reasonable suspicion; Law enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08326140152307351,"score_gpt":0.41846224571745705,"score_spread":0.33520084419438356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202648162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015923893,0.0051871194,0.096135914,0.11970871,0.0020226692,0.000664007,0.00048475587,0.000555757,0.7593171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88312894,0.0022625318,0.037488516,0.025647609,0.00092120416,0.0007965665,0.00042290404,0.00027402586,0.049057636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88345623,0.030596983,0.01080047,0.010463961,0.056664765,0.008017583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90076333,0.030246086,0.0076784487,0.014084764,0.04226838,0.004958922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048240688,0.0012634149,0.0012195151,0.0067115235,0.016423378,0.020699596,0.0055285674,0.012416059,0.0080335485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14901903,0.0011009161,0.0016179796,0.0038311037,0.07425588,0.015688635,0.012613785,0.0127858715,0.002725414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008598472,0.00000731355,0.00073848886,0.00006219957,0.0000064913397,0.00004970464,0.006768449,0.00012818402,0.000103912265,0.97473675,0.010133462,0.0072563565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022978475,0.000037149854,0.0024167015,0.00059248926,0.000031959516,0.00033923844,0.0055160285,0.0008102826,0.0005976159,0.73268354,0.25683215,0.00011985021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17256309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11805223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17256309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043239787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06143392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3431173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204721237","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-026","title":"A Thousand and One Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Fantasy; Immigration; Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); Class (philosophy); Criminology; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04230994759335325,"score_gpt":0.2498661968757523,"score_spread":0.20755624928239905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204721237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007225996,0.004408079,0.0014850216,0.009201563,0.0008693962,0.000022141869,0.00013668458,0.00006321584,0.9830913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026210286,0.004370303,0.0017470269,0.0054404605,0.0005164611,0.00005934917,0.0002326055,0.00011284845,0.9613105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984811,0.00031721068,0.000063102656,0.00033800793,0.0006048497,0.0001957087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873024,0.0003783072,0.00005749024,0.00029477067,0.00036852836,0.00017062653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014377855,0.00057015044,0.00045854322,0.0015370959,0.0050810156,0.0068528038,0.00097144104,0.002702204,0.091250524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003196733,0.00035484968,0.0004276005,0.001528895,0.007356272,0.010673447,0.0031500328,0.0056535117,0.017898818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000546277,0.00001111888,0.000065793334,0.000033130767,0.0000021345481,0.000036152134,0.0006207862,0.000036071826,0.000070373346,0.8885733,0.086190514,0.024355218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023140685,0.0000044924423,0.000099602155,0.00014136866,0.0000021468418,0.00009061643,0.00026086075,0.000027586419,0.000045979577,0.07269935,0.92661995,0.0000055720916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009391144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020088613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091250524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044610044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050050262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3052634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204845976","doi":"","title":"The Principle International Human Rights Instruments to Which Canada Has Not Yet Acceded","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Negotiation; Convention; Government (linguistics); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; International human rights law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.019640334525564334,"score_gpt":0.30987673156628337,"score_spread":0.290236397040719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204845976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013887923,0.0066413376,0.012555453,0.10671935,0.001618871,0.00015310297,0.00037426292,0.00018155281,0.85786813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63279355,0.0052963216,0.023362022,0.060716867,0.00053440215,0.00025607465,0.0003184707,0.0001531409,0.2765691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98017395,0.0017684458,0.00042202225,0.0014322458,0.012428126,0.003775263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919699,0.001876748,0.0006283304,0.0010115205,0.003744067,0.0007694865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006932244,0.0005497178,0.0006014271,0.0016620925,0.013981877,0.01645894,0.002104985,0.008513911,0.004953344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018231066,0.00044344732,0.00080419093,0.0023070397,0.023102509,0.0041388315,0.004589764,0.012593081,0.0008902602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047531184,0.000005492464,0.00028346595,0.00003263577,0.00000439977,0.000027488548,0.001608256,0.00008250919,0.00010605317,0.9803847,0.01074936,0.0067108995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022328994,0.000028581502,0.0034197508,0.00042075166,0.000057023215,0.00013713852,0.002731598,0.00038979,0.00096729974,0.12837933,0.86333966,0.000106735664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88090783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9175864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11909217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048224065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16708384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34989172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208567640","doi":"","title":"Slipping Through the Gate: Trusting Daubert to Reveal the 'Pseudo-Historian' - Troubling Lessons from Holocaust-Related Trials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; Law; Craft; Nazism; Credibility; German; Supreme court; Nazi Germany; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08415315685775286,"score_gpt":0.38979413471632646,"score_spread":0.3056409778585736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208567640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12903245,0.019688362,0.023527756,0.40438214,0.0033236598,0.00018133332,0.000101068836,0.00022944881,0.41953385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728601,0.0035950663,0.004445699,0.0924694,0.00095456245,0.00014785575,0.000035667268,0.00014385606,0.025347829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984565,0.01021823,0.00038402335,0.0011739129,0.001979372,0.0016795171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9539164,0.040089592,0.0012165998,0.0021298698,0.0019469681,0.0007005663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027515989,0.00032392654,0.00054850196,0.0012075716,0.010022271,0.01518733,0.0023491916,0.013537388,0.0026886004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06708535,0.0004033131,0.00059759844,0.0009537239,0.03483443,0.017015528,0.0047544846,0.018866112,0.0006647903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048160666,0.000018136814,0.0007518412,0.0000686258,0.0000129448235,0.00087908655,0.047709726,0.00022878147,0.0002973856,0.9063793,0.030351227,0.013254798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008255426,0.000098952834,0.0016619856,0.0007073017,0.000049223563,0.0006325971,0.054318056,0.0009075795,0.0020435308,0.52553165,0.41385332,0.00011328597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01867792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033658266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027515989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064993873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007574796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14552021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211030804","doi":"","title":"Negotiation, Mediation, Globalization Protests and Police: Right Processes; Wrong System, Issues, Parties and Time","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Globalization; Political science; Government (linguistics); Mediation; Summit; Negotiation; Political dissent; Law; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy","score_opus":0.007413245696545718,"score_gpt":0.27626401348668383,"score_spread":0.2688507677901381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211030804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05700295,0.082493454,0.0149370525,0.24423589,0.0016703843,0.00012600134,0.000055232005,0.00005901606,0.5994201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588948,0.014796501,0.0024268746,0.011187961,0.00070566026,0.00021057944,0.000016556107,0.000040397754,0.011720701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734986,0.022003919,0.00047131345,0.00070717925,0.0017026506,0.0016164015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97435683,0.01993393,0.0032310416,0.00083893404,0.0006979592,0.0009413266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0158766,0.00072585535,0.0005879057,0.003394513,0.013761425,0.024740843,0.0017207111,0.0074970257,0.010502666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021461282,0.00048820162,0.0005037323,0.004522258,0.058163583,0.025836961,0.012765574,0.006750781,0.00061293534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020795997,0.00003564702,0.00088642637,0.00020550883,0.000010506033,0.00040727496,0.041346036,0.00011230185,0.000032282504,0.94387734,0.0046917605,0.008374083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004270937,0.000042890275,0.0023774905,0.0013812792,0.000022737659,0.00058981584,0.12572555,0.00031422512,0.00028882586,0.68229157,0.18687522,0.000047697984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007407707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062970114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024740843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069374945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067068865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08396453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221225313","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-78845-4_7","title":"What is in a Clause?","year":2012,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; Canada Research Chairs; Division of Materials Research; Génome Québec","keywords":"Dependent clause; Non-finite clause; Linguistics; Establishment Clause; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.09850979620492568,"score_gpt":0.35951739711179725,"score_spread":0.2610076009068716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221225313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024343976,0.0032470538,0.005590332,0.026929544,0.0022395367,0.000037572092,0.00009859809,0.00005812036,0.9593649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25029093,0.0041517783,0.004251313,0.03227684,0.00247002,0.00019257313,0.00034479392,0.0006069215,0.7054148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757487,0.0009226845,0.00008772204,0.0004582843,0.00059951027,0.00035691148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.000917247,0.000078954115,0.00018764974,0.00035198388,0.00013430086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031208983,0.00039411115,0.0006100147,0.0009642696,0.0051836306,0.009898844,0.001346949,0.0043317922,0.032127786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006433672,0.0004985974,0.00035863454,0.0013670108,0.011417871,0.015426551,0.001975334,0.007390673,0.008427848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000746769,0.000006478013,0.00007165096,0.000015748037,0.0000015800621,0.000041970296,0.0026826726,0.000015547044,0.000056831377,0.9509156,0.036473006,0.009711597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007247489,0.000007875159,0.0002346097,0.00022865168,0.000007132916,0.00010256233,0.0055334694,0.00010139557,0.00022753252,0.2549549,0.7385795,0.000015003004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014352125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016075518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032127786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041551488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039495034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1074782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215040816","doi":"","title":"The Operational Realities of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Permission; Population; Law and economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.02119631511834286,"score_gpt":0.3062490135462332,"score_spread":0.2850526984278903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215040816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011875882,0.004339903,0.042618815,0.057809982,0.0012812645,0.00023602643,0.00051155017,0.0002587681,0.8810678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8695348,0.003995473,0.03553328,0.013155997,0.0011036531,0.00056491117,0.00040098425,0.00031533436,0.07539572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95013154,0.01587436,0.0019007222,0.0055704424,0.02140883,0.005114093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614384,0.014278707,0.0026050704,0.005166323,0.014612055,0.0018994289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030016713,0.0007936641,0.00070003833,0.004289955,0.014548685,0.022073189,0.003119857,0.007037336,0.009843576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066460975,0.0007852505,0.00075456384,0.005790043,0.077303246,0.013165283,0.0060196747,0.010612313,0.0011690853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026850319,0.0000011856156,0.000077214696,0.0000057134844,7.96182e-7,0.000010333684,0.0004964305,0.000079080244,0.000010691952,0.9955107,0.0023323037,0.0014729525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025734415,0.000022639308,0.0012515195,0.0003080811,0.00001803683,0.000091225105,0.0023086227,0.0011395263,0.0002279407,0.73930347,0.25520554,0.00009772019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54645836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41275468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54645836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05944133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07302803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221552570","doi":"","title":"Kwiatkowski : Privacy Protection and Risk Analysis: Losing the Forest in the Telephoto Shots of the Trees","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Supreme court; Normative; Entitlement (fair division); Sight; Law; Balance (ability); Business; Law and economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02221279542262649,"score_gpt":0.2856049322414753,"score_spread":0.2633921368188488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221552570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037023824,0.026719192,0.04543179,0.4321101,0.004845105,0.00039706772,0.0004122304,0.00032376923,0.45273688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59710133,0.023635454,0.024946503,0.10818231,0.0023304836,0.00064523506,0.00024195219,0.00036727556,0.24254945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959974,0.001381609,0.00033943748,0.00054908096,0.0010983228,0.00063418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973291,0.001747138,0.00022512866,0.0001725519,0.00040352627,0.00012252717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004235451,0.00083655416,0.00044257057,0.001582293,0.009663962,0.011581626,0.001535741,0.010970845,0.007056257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012645811,0.00071739603,0.0007837278,0.0017895041,0.012538022,0.016683351,0.0038799862,0.009894909,0.0015409478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000370808,0.00002625213,0.0006136641,0.00008192537,0.000010163114,0.0010284503,0.00726489,0.00022396477,0.0003905903,0.9076758,0.06789878,0.014748304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003347567,0.00002993431,0.0036825382,0.00080212764,0.000055026598,0.0009757113,0.017060352,0.0013573787,0.001699748,0.5550491,0.41911423,0.00014049029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023412546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040329184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023412546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053217122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058903787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04655254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217361879","doi":"","title":"Rights-vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Charter; Legislation; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Publishing; Obligation; Bill of rights; Public administration; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03275547374255387,"score_gpt":0.3047101050061511,"score_spread":0.2719546312635972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217361879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65290207,0.00319371,0.002212003,0.021175357,0.00020273242,0.00039367029,0.0010368804,0.00006688154,0.3188166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835777,0.0009414699,0.001294544,0.0015094645,0.000024680521,0.00006240181,0.00039448374,0.00004370964,0.012151569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748039,0.0025094815,0.00066923455,0.0014989015,0.013972438,0.0065460177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96304727,0.0077441554,0.0058367853,0.0016810638,0.01716191,0.004528742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012617586,0.0003941854,0.00085710234,0.0062605534,0.014212895,0.010420978,0.0017017478,0.0017915632,0.004878808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049742106,0.00037709344,0.0011583545,0.013027232,0.012560411,0.004826003,0.005431076,0.004462822,0.00020642465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003930801,0.00037440297,0.31506038,0.00042941765,0.00029103426,0.0012108886,0.09257296,0.001681513,0.00095798983,0.4616297,0.021116767,0.10428188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001252174,0.000156795,0.75454396,0.0005684609,0.0003205333,0.00032641413,0.105481446,0.0022884456,0.0013963096,0.018530622,0.115911245,0.00035052872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15313394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15313394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14060129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218554148","doi":"","title":"Enforcing the Right to Reasonableness in Social Rights Litigation: The Canadian Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Enforcement; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Social rights; Economics","score_opus":0.015397517568409463,"score_gpt":0.2941811052310584,"score_spread":0.27878358766264894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218554148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09213089,0.025042387,0.0057019615,0.2689199,0.001988759,0.00028987593,0.00045225737,0.00019120092,0.60528284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82478046,0.0286931,0.006375743,0.037895724,0.00037893935,0.00012625403,0.00022790034,0.00028960314,0.10123216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669155,0.007339118,0.0008595081,0.0023274797,0.014306228,0.008252053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678743,0.013219238,0.0009264387,0.00097643555,0.0121034235,0.004900281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02314713,0.0008769722,0.0013072703,0.003624276,0.07546036,0.021364337,0.0056366627,0.010034357,0.01361018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03738897,0.0010700786,0.0011802971,0.009035142,0.03444181,0.007610917,0.009315929,0.012939094,0.00089367764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011557269,0.00015768256,0.0040890817,0.00044065635,0.00004069375,0.0021200054,0.10479965,0.0012636513,0.00064038794,0.73526764,0.08451882,0.066546164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000753868,0.000066858534,0.0059294454,0.00061097776,0.00006861847,0.0006128153,0.06518006,0.0010267826,0.0005849239,0.031199485,0.8943873,0.000257315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99803764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32245663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32245663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41331992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7858543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220102439","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of the Impact of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Judicial Review of Administrative Action","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Law; Bill of rights; Publishing; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights","score_opus":0.08819755292381076,"score_gpt":0.3964468918595072,"score_spread":0.30824933893569645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220102439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25273392,0.018458182,0.000878878,0.06996892,0.0008283469,0.00035977838,0.0008964521,0.000045822813,0.6558297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722188,0.0052057803,0.00046373994,0.007096429,0.00034851301,0.00010127693,0.0002336354,0.000033676348,0.014298201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89143467,0.020891156,0.0026030375,0.0022300682,0.06908255,0.013758477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8140961,0.10754971,0.014931631,0.0042622965,0.0496505,0.009509726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03493964,0.00035203315,0.000780001,0.008649721,0.0062189815,0.010320976,0.0024425327,0.003936561,0.00892164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1857174,0.0005989176,0.0010444133,0.00930435,0.011784121,0.0035667163,0.0040493943,0.0053141234,0.0005303483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014022293,0.000558383,0.07916673,0.0009317102,0.000516522,0.001342812,0.024192931,0.003356076,0.001120985,0.5796555,0.1178576,0.18989842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005427431,0.0007174479,0.73155725,0.001315266,0.0006988473,0.00034700643,0.015692951,0.0015170596,0.0012563444,0.02675358,0.21928912,0.00031238934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8532042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9351666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14679581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068670854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107631944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49824423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222141872","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the Avenues of Redress: The Post-Conviction Review Process in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Redress; Appeal; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Commit; Prison; Criminal code; Criminology; Statutory law; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.040148865371233765,"score_gpt":0.3479604715189953,"score_spread":0.30781160614776154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222141872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125061935,0.8883609,0.00038709637,0.07138462,0.0017298786,0.000251856,0.0002653668,0.0000495809,0.025064556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2499071,0.71027565,0.0021010689,0.02977421,0.0011440653,0.0001998801,0.00040424702,0.000060292943,0.00613346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758607,0.0041251825,0.001671621,0.001611465,0.013835011,0.00289605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8766263,0.034000687,0.008622719,0.0015804016,0.067484885,0.011685011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023211982,0.00047995604,0.0012717915,0.00986413,0.009209297,0.010851325,0.0064927614,0.0043577617,0.0034569982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09035724,0.0010090484,0.00072580593,0.013784736,0.009171525,0.0024151294,0.0033574463,0.005632922,0.00033880482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034022666,0.00030345016,0.016998738,0.014078425,0.00029153726,0.0011204997,0.010000333,0.0010346436,0.00031689802,0.060317177,0.2087603,0.6864378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026359962,0.00026125336,0.14949846,0.04050095,0.0006756731,0.0008443309,0.008851334,0.0009787126,0.0006097762,0.0075652855,0.78950065,0.00044995666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99580306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2643085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2643085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48160657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8532978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224111528","doi":"","title":"Au Revoir, Monsieur Big? Confessions, Coercion, and the Courts","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Appeal; Suspect; Coercion (linguistics); Criminology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020644478027684664,"score_gpt":0.29218211667508354,"score_spread":0.2715376386473989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224111528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16113205,0.028397892,0.0019658182,0.5431139,0.00096549274,0.0000431745,0.00011251765,0.00005637384,0.26421282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94474596,0.002276857,0.00038938742,0.034327686,0.0003648781,0.000016308983,0.000011677667,0.000023272194,0.017843997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338067,0.0031994851,0.00014192532,0.0003968515,0.0015244375,0.0013566763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886342,0.0067511313,0.001066853,0.00074453803,0.0021071949,0.0006960737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007166869,0.00027944264,0.00034648343,0.0008879132,0.010006606,0.009782245,0.0014400218,0.007307159,0.004789222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018293131,0.0002835774,0.0003133185,0.0006343706,0.028203566,0.005930569,0.0023018115,0.0074889725,0.00053660723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007859197,0.000038745966,0.0063375016,0.00009607752,0.000017392736,0.0011632495,0.039679635,0.000103228114,0.0005683864,0.8843467,0.044534117,0.023036264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008656938,0.00013778594,0.038337875,0.0018880508,0.000055409106,0.0017221986,0.09812113,0.0007448683,0.0028566946,0.3217766,0.5340242,0.00024859127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32921493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3913975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32921493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0122225275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009248003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6545974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225290797","doi":"","title":"Commentary on \"Prosecutions, Politics and the Public Interest: Some Recent Developments in the United Kingdom, Canada and Elsewhere\"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Politics; Political science; Public interest; Law","score_opus":0.07549714640242551,"score_gpt":0.3246354857830783,"score_spread":0.24913833938065283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225290797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003257972,0.009857105,0.00005907439,0.9537013,0.032421455,0.000012221607,0.00014438095,0.000017868455,0.0034607835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00785658,0.006573193,0.000180544,0.9542208,0.01844046,0.000038144826,0.00006020995,0.000047674985,0.012582476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163985,0.0017347967,0.00055688445,0.00091397,0.0038075969,0.0013468529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96613395,0.017663166,0.0017238382,0.00036366837,0.010354961,0.0037604428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071717086,0.0010590788,0.0020141716,0.0028552331,0.016588682,0.008522263,0.008012873,0.046120528,0.006264696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029889591,0.00079016713,0.0016786284,0.0061333,0.014658723,0.0051050563,0.0031225248,0.028898727,0.0020538697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018342256,0.000002711155,0.00009777719,0.000103111015,0.0000052687687,0.00018465986,0.00079044804,0.000038815564,0.000029637999,0.0040394785,0.99286675,0.0018230977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024776064,0.000012509334,0.002063069,0.0014257199,0.000035317138,0.00015755244,0.0040257066,0.00010803004,0.00009750333,0.0028074575,0.9891685,0.000073813484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7509326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87334263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24906743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049233127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059698693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5010685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226649503","doi":"","title":"The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli: Justiciability, Discretion and the Limits of the Rule of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Justiciability; Economic Justice; Political question; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018979670868941725,"score_gpt":0.32012134387680236,"score_spread":0.30114167300786066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226649503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021922704,0.047865346,0.012833004,0.53213847,0.0013700412,0.000062519706,0.00016917726,0.000068425405,0.38357034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8494996,0.025183974,0.00780279,0.057138283,0.0020144293,0.00018880212,0.00008254513,0.00008803272,0.058001447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236816,0.0026817725,0.00016889734,0.00083755574,0.0031460922,0.0007975753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029046,0.006799788,0.0005921352,0.0006369706,0.0011102498,0.0005703039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061950767,0.00053239573,0.0006447616,0.0023712576,0.009241535,0.013671006,0.002106598,0.007111688,0.0028931608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012883223,0.0003874294,0.00032102832,0.002265114,0.07838838,0.011249295,0.004570307,0.010591945,0.0004845439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036169881,0.000002547669,0.00012564324,0.000012587538,9.5162295e-7,0.00003327897,0.0013810777,0.000041490595,0.000013644734,0.9884272,0.0068120444,0.003145929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009800231,0.00001015634,0.0012335507,0.00035284687,0.0000064970827,0.000083060884,0.0021397898,0.00041607628,0.00016009642,0.82427645,0.17127693,0.000034813358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4085198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3915399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4085198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029847357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02637901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8122839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227705386","doi":"","title":"The Governor General opens national conference on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Governor; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08110723644788768,"score_gpt":0.33488453670754303,"score_spread":0.25377730025965534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227705386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005768641,0.011573412,0.0016287415,0.6643169,0.056591135,0.0006053073,0.0021397881,0.00025996717,0.25711605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059593968,0.0053824983,0.003189657,0.16165312,0.005611765,0.00029786114,0.00096779456,0.00026767357,0.76303566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765929,0.0013805968,0.0006667292,0.0014739565,0.012733211,0.0071526226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800971,0.0027643112,0.00040857086,0.00073068484,0.011545209,0.0044540623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0142513355,0.0014419031,0.0018670654,0.0035037682,0.026823262,0.017733235,0.004444403,0.026365403,0.02498941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029232722,0.0013616574,0.0021179162,0.0028941226,0.010806005,0.00416379,0.004833539,0.029463151,0.003318601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021230628,0.000028063825,0.00046773977,0.000046210425,0.000009142585,0.00009185527,0.00049870054,0.00013503035,0.00015154184,0.05984087,0.9327271,0.0059825657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012654488,0.0000076315355,0.0021004411,0.00010449207,0.00000898264,0.000013218229,0.00076286535,0.00008579527,0.00008152486,0.0027475164,0.994021,0.000053773856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98052853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99270236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10942088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10942088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.342169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79390776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228131771","doi":"","title":"'Pulling the Patches' on the Patchwork Defence of Duress: A Comment on R. v. Aravena","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Harmonization; Political science; Criminal law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0652323083463739,"score_gpt":0.31699781750507977,"score_spread":0.2517655091587059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228131771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063816854,0.005790187,0.0010159396,0.94580334,0.0034443438,0.000050941737,0.00029950147,0.00008716263,0.037126835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049841333,0.002009117,0.0007001301,0.9316864,0.002256791,0.00009301822,0.00006995264,0.00010331904,0.013239999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97782147,0.0074062855,0.0013926573,0.0032636374,0.0054805893,0.0046354183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96880585,0.023903409,0.001225406,0.001272498,0.0036836613,0.0011091846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018859282,0.0011898691,0.0019928007,0.001320208,0.016571684,0.013326672,0.011276489,0.09169056,0.0038167269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04828236,0.001866545,0.0035473362,0.002040776,0.02592066,0.009113788,0.0048967525,0.07423083,0.002153542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016816841,0.000029696937,0.0009869391,0.00022297804,0.000057565172,0.0013093529,0.02208981,0.00031934402,0.0007396552,0.3791561,0.58905804,0.0058622225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019757928,0.000096773925,0.00421127,0.0014412695,0.00018031192,0.0007711713,0.01828571,0.00068106956,0.0013736796,0.077996165,0.8943634,0.0004016906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41373396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5195386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41373396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017145874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023817716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8226515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229581093","doi":"","title":"The Pluralism of the Charter: Revisiting the Oakes Test","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Substantive due process; Substantive rights; Fundamental rights; Declaration; Democracy; Human rights; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.012328739375110049,"score_gpt":0.2889855904866441,"score_spread":0.27665685111153404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229581093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12705518,0.0020713555,0.02134603,0.053071484,0.001601931,0.00018671663,0.00032309495,0.00010576668,0.79423857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600755,0.00056630914,0.005922388,0.0092306435,0.00087932864,0.00020107707,0.00019042206,0.00014639177,0.02278805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489501,0.020448722,0.0017820391,0.0069880453,0.01764335,0.0041877204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91238695,0.057904392,0.005283008,0.008888916,0.012368137,0.0031685433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05275964,0.0006391957,0.002059058,0.002574818,0.012029505,0.011087658,0.004234767,0.0066087465,0.01938248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12887265,0.000500317,0.0015451912,0.0029515182,0.04324748,0.02637494,0.012694427,0.01217864,0.0016988153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050954935,0.000024933142,0.0012131678,0.000020209796,0.00000858055,0.00007899125,0.0016707703,0.00013089123,0.000030925425,0.9869625,0.0038028315,0.0060051843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001379868,0.000091369555,0.0035414652,0.0002551386,0.00004572682,0.0000901268,0.0034563423,0.0028377122,0.00031208972,0.92526084,0.06387609,0.000095127354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072552964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06561874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072552964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011476093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014014613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27902293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230176755","doi":"","title":"THE DEFENCE COUNSELS ETHICS IN PLEA BARGAINING:LOSING SIGHT OF THE INNOCENT?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Negotiation; Surrender; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.20871199877432872,"score_gpt":0.4047578393578987,"score_spread":0.19604584058357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230176755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063117435,0.03328101,0.009927432,0.7884013,0.003855075,0.000022143975,0.000016169035,0.000027802513,0.15815732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53439415,0.048489027,0.010447438,0.30300906,0.016948367,0.00021944805,0.000049099213,0.00025044312,0.08619289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710215,0.021005519,0.0006247995,0.0011518392,0.004578188,0.0016181297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766614,0.018267816,0.00081385486,0.00089052937,0.0019266397,0.0014398166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024698274,0.0005349386,0.00063620304,0.0009375026,0.0094344,0.017333478,0.0022929758,0.01905695,0.0059437477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054000475,0.00059125567,0.00046432565,0.0013344809,0.04854866,0.01597765,0.005804816,0.022936396,0.0023479853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018300523,0.000019148994,0.00023494159,0.00006545561,0.0000046731952,0.00040407013,0.0077247983,0.00015852584,0.00007246803,0.9202842,0.050824795,0.020188527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027045677,0.000021414813,0.00028036704,0.0007074661,0.000006490312,0.00070184073,0.008712549,0.00047785786,0.00013664208,0.6136119,0.37528,0.000036451147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015845658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018084265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024698274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096034175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114044165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13061851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231620613","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, American and Canadian Confrontation and Hearsay Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Common law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.012052283138683005,"score_gpt":0.323288714775776,"score_spread":0.31123643163709297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231620613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008918143,0.0138572985,0.043073308,0.6527165,0.0025735153,0.00013950228,0.0001404983,0.00019146639,0.27838978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7614187,0.009570012,0.045111615,0.13411988,0.0030688473,0.00038235937,0.00013479248,0.00022083578,0.045972887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95780814,0.009526783,0.0013282517,0.0034165182,0.023782218,0.0041380813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969638,0.013547361,0.0010607187,0.0015654131,0.012820458,0.0013680495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033097897,0.00090260664,0.0013902402,0.006010138,0.022591228,0.021310836,0.009053013,0.020556858,0.004153531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05435228,0.00078645913,0.001606189,0.0053817593,0.105240434,0.012998816,0.007662766,0.026442405,0.0006393474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040805958,0.0000039065194,0.00007212282,0.000030724368,0.000002565288,0.00004499587,0.0019241009,0.00011231522,0.000027270093,0.9898192,0.004226108,0.0037326429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003833899,0.000018346913,0.00076134,0.0005566692,0.000033365195,0.00012078893,0.0043863263,0.0014984562,0.00023743042,0.8171556,0.175106,0.000087369845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7820356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7586321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21796441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07602214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16713521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55158186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231804219","doi":"","title":"Destruction of Documents Before Proceedings Commence: What is a Court to Do?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Contempt; Fair trial; Test (biology); Discretion; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Human rights","score_opus":0.019560513640293545,"score_gpt":0.31006258907944195,"score_spread":0.2905020754391484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231804219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016740348,0.019477077,0.009904842,0.81893814,0.0051066927,0.00034964035,0.0001487714,0.00022033736,0.12911409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5644697,0.017157773,0.018886901,0.34220532,0.006931001,0.0007390332,0.00027622396,0.00047023548,0.048863783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9091782,0.03456666,0.0068870783,0.0073939124,0.03174292,0.010231257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82588094,0.086210065,0.014804622,0.0093187615,0.033999328,0.029786287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07165474,0.0007065234,0.0025902833,0.006693542,0.025663035,0.040985607,0.0060603563,0.050062317,0.008515944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24324502,0.0010768279,0.0012939589,0.0044273688,0.028411362,0.0331839,0.006995261,0.022002827,0.003905816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017022647,0.0005252007,0.008354782,0.00051983446,0.00015408009,0.0013098038,0.0070207105,0.00091532664,0.0010136588,0.60786086,0.19217879,0.1799767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036736473,0.00033298042,0.009025023,0.002893816,0.0001679506,0.0008984134,0.012967469,0.0015725245,0.0015991767,0.52134025,0.44820043,0.0006345399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044380452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046477307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07165474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015927663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051775314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.378951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231866243","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Subject Guides at Cambrian College. Law & Legislation. Books.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Legislation; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06725198866164864,"score_gpt":0.31777618992205303,"score_spread":0.2505242012604044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231866243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053199264,0.010151985,0.00017517185,0.0022750474,0.00026026755,0.000052948923,0.005276813,0.0010129152,0.9802628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022028075,0.0056766933,0.0003329539,0.00050704886,0.00005842999,0.00005472076,0.002251251,0.00029742895,0.98861873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996575,0.000027809456,0.000019820198,0.000039081566,0.00019968346,0.000056075798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931324,0.000096964126,0.000037573147,0.00003941893,0.00035325147,0.00015969631],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002175573,0.0009563408,0.00058770063,0.004913713,0.0033567508,0.0037151265,0.0008914299,0.0015365916,0.5529895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013162388,0.00083298347,0.00022554597,0.01002692,0.00081366074,0.0030641975,0.0014067802,0.001443547,0.3516147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057194543,0.000009785454,0.00017799846,0.0001336714,6.959686e-7,0.0000297326,0.00023874908,0.000018759505,0.000047116526,0.0021203065,0.92002726,0.07719023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013760008,0.000002186856,0.0009275552,0.00014020513,7.10109e-7,0.000030672032,0.00018277914,0.000010605713,0.000039456187,0.00038260964,0.9982784,0.0000035679516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17525911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53808945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5529895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040683597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007899235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63760626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223269129","doi":"","title":"R. v. Gomboc : Considering the Proper Role of the 'Biographic Core' in a Section 8 Informational Privacy Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Determinative; Plaintiff; Element (criminal law); Core (optical fiber); Meaning (existential); Law; Internet privacy; Charter; Section (typography); Personally identifiable information; Test (biology); Political science; Petitioner; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Advertising; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03345552542870135,"score_gpt":0.27004442504336956,"score_spread":0.23658889961466822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223269129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14382017,0.014912602,0.01633112,0.26986814,0.0008729438,0.00033629057,0.00042307877,0.00019164439,0.55324394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88293153,0.0022338217,0.005866634,0.081320874,0.0003673874,0.00025160675,0.00009488564,0.000060760754,0.026872551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902823,0.0029430334,0.00030055776,0.0009516418,0.0026684708,0.002854004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369746,0.0037051209,0.00045816606,0.00041162787,0.0012591921,0.00046843663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073957504,0.00076669373,0.00079612056,0.0029633727,0.013963194,0.0114691425,0.0030739796,0.01742427,0.002408434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017228682,0.0007646161,0.0013355032,0.0016006511,0.024654195,0.0065067383,0.0049838466,0.016283752,0.0005125199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023324745,0.0000064049837,0.00046913163,0.000024892934,0.000007414155,0.00038436113,0.0053697717,0.00013845951,0.00017996081,0.98568106,0.005284213,0.0024310404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011657815,0.000114153816,0.008732267,0.0015347317,0.00021412845,0.0007898642,0.014158508,0.0026725372,0.0019130834,0.7293822,0.24012138,0.0002505376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49601033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5306806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49601033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019133123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023836475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98624647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234091314","doi":"","title":"Textual Regulation of Child Welfare: A Critique of the Ontario Risk Assessment Model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Risk assessment; Economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020881249759436595,"score_gpt":0.31001753731631926,"score_spread":0.28913628755688264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234091314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017073512,0.018376168,0.11669339,0.3850575,0.0008733882,0.0002700998,0.0015750898,0.00021324593,0.45986757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84312624,0.016012019,0.039041936,0.034297086,0.0020072616,0.0008376965,0.00039111177,0.0002785097,0.06400813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96731246,0.009930186,0.0015622366,0.002661195,0.016600918,0.0019330347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9348828,0.047604345,0.0033053593,0.0031592743,0.01027868,0.00076940045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028207708,0.0009898886,0.0020156645,0.0050620753,0.008214058,0.011967044,0.0076067005,0.009183028,0.010155416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07439159,0.0013548764,0.0015520022,0.005831838,0.043292616,0.008948428,0.004134583,0.008693391,0.0009965631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014068011,0.0000065963495,0.00033807274,0.00009821303,0.000013856963,0.000024284082,0.0015068454,0.0007025787,0.000025564437,0.98246217,0.00748463,0.007323098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006159791,0.000009204581,0.0020242522,0.00061039045,0.00008288344,0.000043566713,0.0010383913,0.0038074602,0.00017300044,0.9062887,0.08580173,0.000058959256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8123765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7839705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1876235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076008074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07142099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55147976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234102304","doi":"","title":"Future of Administrative Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Economic Justice; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Public administration; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.15010953640951769,"score_gpt":0.4080569052022564,"score_spread":0.2579473687927387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234102304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000903323,0.031836685,0.0014849205,0.8955611,0.011746559,0.000008977752,0.000026381143,0.000043216263,0.058388904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30253565,0.08533036,0.008630822,0.45509166,0.06019176,0.00022798999,0.00018340365,0.00013805812,0.08767027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820817,0.009806244,0.0003522543,0.0010810272,0.0036621804,0.0030166248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825858,0.0067631314,0.00084085047,0.00091093796,0.0044927993,0.00440642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017034527,0.00043144147,0.00073616265,0.0016691682,0.010964809,0.019148502,0.001877403,0.012738128,0.016951887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02123615,0.00030127857,0.0010963691,0.0010624212,0.014874671,0.016783396,0.006003135,0.016850254,0.002854727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019821748,0.00003184416,0.00025854787,0.000101559715,0.000007296347,0.00005158225,0.0009169291,0.00013697434,0.00006257479,0.68338394,0.28132585,0.03370315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069528605,0.000023276787,0.0006486906,0.00042292665,0.000005540798,0.00012473117,0.0024874266,0.00024263642,0.000052298856,0.2406755,0.7552866,0.000023367842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050119865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011090021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019148502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010596713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02397603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09008831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234217147","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Enhancements? Section 146 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on R. v. L.T.H.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01920899303693628,"score_gpt":0.27753711767691563,"score_spread":0.25832812463997934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234217147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074789943,0.005595264,0.00061768445,0.90703654,0.0043706708,0.00012130268,0.001221948,0.00013151967,0.07342603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040759142,0.0022069456,0.0011017824,0.9169031,0.0018558283,0.000095208154,0.00018864182,0.000076994496,0.03681236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716044,0.0010901882,0.00058911135,0.0009643253,0.0054025543,0.0047934423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98388416,0.0050067734,0.0007596593,0.0004733654,0.0075646644,0.0023113843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008658712,0.0008854576,0.0011788209,0.0012582649,0.017227028,0.007697264,0.006183143,0.04497789,0.0072752615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027766412,0.0011531948,0.0018277959,0.002409243,0.0060258773,0.00367989,0.0029288547,0.025066406,0.0019368863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062531595,0.000053263866,0.0035303743,0.00010832099,0.000036354373,0.00031905304,0.0028790606,0.0002578559,0.00054477213,0.07835143,0.90379834,0.010058694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001642347,0.000064026746,0.021175241,0.0007217436,0.00025761058,0.00022865424,0.0046827495,0.00082167884,0.0016746764,0.0153444335,0.954573,0.00029194303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98762184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04497789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043660346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18528187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31677943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235689524","doi":"","title":"Criminalizing Sex at the Margins","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Imprisonment; Criminal code; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sexual intercourse; Nullification; Criminal law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.06133462864017296,"score_gpt":0.31027403355647554,"score_spread":0.24893940491630256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235689524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06901692,0.0036278183,0.0027564832,0.045814864,0.00066798157,0.00007853339,0.00015005574,0.00004090088,0.8778465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85492194,0.0031028986,0.000749461,0.030431038,0.00045835416,0.000077757155,0.00006150247,0.000034295324,0.11016285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979989,0.00030761785,0.000053513606,0.00023506588,0.0008716101,0.00053333933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851733,0.00065498217,0.00012869014,0.00016892429,0.00036268978,0.00016741545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015642771,0.0002256402,0.00026778187,0.00051256927,0.006863742,0.003732974,0.00095072866,0.004993153,0.007310459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074237194,0.00020225724,0.0003220844,0.0004121727,0.01198837,0.0026886156,0.0038517576,0.005010068,0.0009982531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000219308,0.000023776254,0.003400412,0.000039732837,0.000007686022,0.00073353626,0.013471945,0.00007686737,0.00047812072,0.9399353,0.021376386,0.020434251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028710503,0.00008312764,0.010476134,0.00091514824,0.000042772408,0.0016113593,0.031267345,0.00045606933,0.0024446324,0.27255902,0.68005913,0.000056601693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09618354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13327359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09618354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020056455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080546085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1912474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238444062","doi":"10.71781/2085","title":"L'utilisation du domaine de la preuve par la Cour suprême du Canada dans la détermination des droits économiques des Autochtones conformément à ses propres valeurs","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04295335503482812,"score_gpt":0.3339635280718605,"score_spread":0.2910101730370324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238444062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113957934,0.016770016,0.025793914,0.09149168,0.0007402277,0.00009770349,0.00035600548,0.00006975286,0.75072294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950438,0.004017495,0.0032731027,0.0044802735,0.00018381963,0.000036892052,0.00004744543,0.00003808205,0.03748496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99403256,0.001886539,0.00017550826,0.0008146755,0.0021788254,0.0009118653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98754716,0.007292935,0.00082255603,0.0006507106,0.0032096428,0.00047695893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006016126,0.000443523,0.00047287514,0.0027047484,0.010694549,0.013774278,0.0015588225,0.0036457616,0.004632582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014444634,0.0003609837,0.00047624047,0.0035364726,0.039274905,0.0046227355,0.0034116197,0.007164006,0.00027683302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096410595,0.000002844613,0.0008746927,0.00004372665,0.000008875545,0.00011368653,0.011461666,0.00019173602,0.000128327,0.98010385,0.0017950747,0.0052659516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034093762,0.000042184052,0.018291846,0.001233515,0.00011970645,0.00034738114,0.034367915,0.002047315,0.0020519556,0.5780804,0.3632251,0.00015857983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7986262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88036215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20137382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055341266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061816376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40511948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241033841","doi":"","title":"Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04554061431224795,"score_gpt":0.3190094333473102,"score_spread":0.27346881903506226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241033841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17901549,0.016987512,0.0019629933,0.4900682,0.0052962825,0.0031304862,0.052128084,0.00026915025,0.25114188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4901454,0.01927339,0.0097319065,0.0446206,0.001990268,0.0023798503,0.024636602,0.0002023819,0.40701953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98464465,0.0014049012,0.00094148854,0.00054575404,0.010280334,0.0021828602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9323706,0.0074206567,0.0033971602,0.002106479,0.044901296,0.009803781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012656002,0.00044277022,0.00055961014,0.004461195,0.007355161,0.005490678,0.0015582014,0.0048775044,0.004675343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027037386,0.0008039814,0.0005886567,0.005277783,0.0027074032,0.0014383257,0.0028928982,0.0031684465,0.0004380573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012108265,0.00007354351,0.063598506,0.00046000525,0.00006653779,0.00025747885,0.006497153,0.00049388834,0.0006428723,0.009134666,0.8973455,0.021308688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007776642,0.000051718005,0.3734366,0.0007014996,0.00014768202,0.00006696287,0.008280889,0.0005373205,0.00067282777,0.0011376496,0.6147878,0.000101345984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98232967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057688102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057688102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27861857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41855842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242657706","doi":"","title":"Improving New Zealand's prosecution system: A practical reform proposal to avoid miscarriages of justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Misconduct; Criminal justice; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Miscarriage; Quality (philosophy); Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04270603438513282,"score_gpt":0.3644047792279266,"score_spread":0.32169874484279376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242657706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05638483,0.0039979056,0.032192566,0.8291426,0.0039318306,0.006171767,0.00024900676,0.00080648577,0.067123115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49657297,0.0067259525,0.17933175,0.23702098,0.0050056586,0.0050456957,0.00047792512,0.00015887694,0.069660194],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697706,0.0096172,0.002657494,0.0026119992,0.010086142,0.005256527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95073104,0.011112621,0.0050465064,0.00418045,0.019202609,0.009726793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0329316,0.00089912594,0.00096330186,0.003992961,0.0060661784,0.00832284,0.0068415576,0.017920969,0.007354288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09348701,0.0010822393,0.0014626135,0.0014207852,0.008149103,0.007931801,0.008092111,0.0068013896,0.0014940213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046581347,0.0025042724,0.016710585,0.0033004372,0.00036675547,0.0053023715,0.014338747,0.014346751,0.00990518,0.32782492,0.24232198,0.3626122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003406476,0.0037921055,0.0706548,0.0030248633,0.00059281103,0.0033959667,0.009389697,0.015297724,0.0033735198,0.056588486,0.8296703,0.00081323273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23467058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25723323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23467058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018268151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11554447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243273353","doi":"","title":"Cops, Crime & Capitalism: The Law and Order Agenda in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05368917277048744,"score_gpt":0.28402606341095377,"score_spread":0.23033689064046634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243273353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41837755,0.023416424,0.0022136655,0.35205778,0.0010131737,0.00027558088,0.0051476895,0.0001143926,0.19738367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92356086,0.009126234,0.0017593782,0.010896796,0.00016652193,0.00007955807,0.0005882771,0.00006688908,0.05375538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994651,0.0005507017,0.00015045084,0.0004090103,0.0014712329,0.0027676118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98174083,0.004206863,0.00085494504,0.0004009637,0.007092054,0.0057043326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003772554,0.00040879124,0.0010370219,0.0050741406,0.027533375,0.014558622,0.0033063109,0.0046650604,0.019069728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019745415,0.0007591604,0.0007451199,0.009318293,0.009632337,0.0045078173,0.0046720803,0.00631397,0.0004103618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015508292,0.00017710739,0.06582227,0.00046347233,0.00010190373,0.0006193283,0.01283835,0.0021517607,0.00016318621,0.70627207,0.13810194,0.07313349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017332974,0.000088753535,0.26277912,0.0018015829,0.00026059334,0.00024985583,0.07556451,0.008690576,0.0009122936,0.1241558,0.5248724,0.0004511749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25793913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25793913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52562016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8606854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244415706","doi":"","title":"The Transnational Judicial Discourse and Felon Disenfranchisement: Re-examining the Textual Premise of Richardson v. Ramirez","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038082577830004787,"score_gpt":0.3461734799922609,"score_spread":0.3080909021622561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244415706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07034655,0.016309734,0.013659346,0.21755071,0.0014338789,0.00007325335,0.0001188618,0.00008573288,0.6804219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605305,0.004101215,0.0019536368,0.017263457,0.0008891747,0.00009792136,0.000033279164,0.00006635757,0.015064477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927857,0.0043623047,0.00025741517,0.0009276969,0.0010112659,0.00065563415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264246,0.005792489,0.00035186688,0.00048456914,0.0006044973,0.00012410773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008439778,0.00048281913,0.00077653123,0.0025960305,0.008713061,0.012472051,0.002095183,0.0072718905,0.002415388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012514531,0.00038469894,0.0007315581,0.0014464345,0.040810872,0.014934059,0.0057696565,0.010679984,0.00041346508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043427626,0.0000034519865,0.0000644419,0.000019884617,0.0000011700232,0.000054726865,0.013700525,0.000045806795,0.000040465664,0.9834758,0.0014925316,0.001096797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038502145,0.00004069353,0.0012033356,0.001442479,0.000036732523,0.00029576203,0.065953076,0.0011177628,0.00091072975,0.4671788,0.46170184,0.000080282865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023145981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023888746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023145981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009716663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049066087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07049966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244818772","doi":"","title":"Stopping Vehicles on a Downhill Slope: R. v. Nolet","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.027230698290303796,"score_gpt":0.30166925562167957,"score_spread":0.2744385573313758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244818772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2316235,0.003194618,0.0031702304,0.10217537,0.001640808,0.00014890886,0.0007408358,0.00019271376,0.657113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7710141,0.0017118282,0.0017386845,0.07420173,0.00025336543,0.00013227738,0.00042677045,0.000044583005,0.15047663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981437,0.00025170718,0.00010623703,0.00025540165,0.00060037855,0.0006425042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911195,0.00044432265,0.00011551851,0.000038862046,0.00014721202,0.00014211147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002037909,0.0003079726,0.00030353255,0.00087837543,0.0063248565,0.0024742256,0.0019013183,0.008994014,0.00672036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068077375,0.00048432872,0.00048983656,0.0006422012,0.0018628095,0.0019051116,0.0016565984,0.006491759,0.0015736761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069572194,0.00029686766,0.035550587,0.00037983482,0.00007367322,0.012392643,0.010256108,0.0016009505,0.0024483833,0.46608743,0.3845546,0.08566325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004107905,0.0010317133,0.05947065,0.0018367211,0.0004133728,0.009201516,0.015299133,0.005411279,0.008223429,0.0712924,0.82692087,0.00048811245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10129109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2889228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10129109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003162781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007791805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20140302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245175412","doi":"","title":"Reforming Homicide Law to Separate Guilt from Sentence: An International Gloss","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Homicide; Sentence; Surprise; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Presumption of innocence; Reasonable doubt; Criminology; Psychology; Simple (philosophy); Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Poison control; Epistemology; Human factors and ergonomics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.047426615117072524,"score_gpt":0.3379117326207648,"score_spread":0.29048511750369227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245175412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050281733,0.08751445,0.018068314,0.109520175,0.0034067514,0.00014778826,0.00033839492,0.00021229453,0.77576375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5483844,0.12154477,0.030431706,0.07699872,0.005925384,0.000417783,0.0009397519,0.00035439324,0.21500306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576086,0.00084315584,0.0002714622,0.00035875855,0.0020868478,0.00067895814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973412,0.0007387944,0.000112545786,0.0002832095,0.0013822083,0.00014195014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005190666,0.00075465767,0.00089303334,0.005886764,0.006297996,0.008515086,0.0028372635,0.0037772898,0.0062586023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066858297,0.00040461263,0.0006210083,0.0044888174,0.01833597,0.005105931,0.0027092977,0.008414016,0.0007158919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027054164,0.000006274955,0.00012263928,0.0000654727,0.0000031914888,0.000038248825,0.0012931948,0.0001727877,0.00008555219,0.95891076,0.021762352,0.017536785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010184021,0.000019408473,0.0019810712,0.0008400188,0.000031147327,0.000114647075,0.0018532098,0.000591376,0.00031616335,0.12118798,0.8730122,0.00004267489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77577764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7767179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77577764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05385392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03478242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4510857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245328831","doi":"","title":"Ontario (Attorney General) V. $29, 020 in Canadian Currency: A Comment on Proceeds of Crime and Provincial Civil Forfeiture Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Currency; Organised crime; Charter; Criminal law; Constitutionality; Legislature; Civil law (Civil law); Business; Economics; Public law; Constitution","score_opus":0.011713126825214071,"score_gpt":0.2651457106834606,"score_spread":0.2534325838582465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245328831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03789561,0.0075899507,0.0006240749,0.5652977,0.0033365574,0.00018775753,0.0030762015,0.00013582685,0.38185623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3266874,0.005847928,0.0008442281,0.4532931,0.0018621552,0.00014618308,0.00064976176,0.000121171994,0.21054801],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950192,0.0003185716,0.00018556244,0.00044308594,0.002092958,0.0019406844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948337,0.002039996,0.0002742311,0.00015980282,0.0020600273,0.00063216226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027679037,0.000604184,0.00065658276,0.0012648061,0.029540917,0.0062969094,0.003977858,0.021674495,0.007967522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009320864,0.0007748651,0.00092430494,0.0032390268,0.00794027,0.0019738777,0.0014264787,0.010417247,0.0010613352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008265256,0.000022004084,0.00504224,0.00016815498,0.000025207699,0.0012908583,0.0150315855,0.00029779278,0.00054750434,0.17798842,0.7940892,0.0054144296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008004885,0.000028964965,0.023325825,0.00040821757,0.00012711945,0.00022359894,0.013508825,0.00043152264,0.0007095795,0.0075963265,0.95336014,0.00019985883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99587387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1046824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1046824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13243906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75952756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245648687","doi":"","title":"'Canada' in Electronic Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Supreme court; Common law; Civil procedure; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil code; Public law","score_opus":0.0215770741561695,"score_gpt":0.2969440318780948,"score_spread":0.2753669577219253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245648687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029575918,0.075881205,0.0072733304,0.1851107,0.007303723,0.00037527905,0.015476935,0.00054093834,0.7050802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15218548,0.14277884,0.032563236,0.17210127,0.004047938,0.0007256291,0.01491288,0.00072932825,0.47995546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97791684,0.004012742,0.0018849737,0.0022245706,0.012317096,0.0016437679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9419229,0.017359797,0.0029265939,0.005914459,0.028807584,0.0030685596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013473991,0.00056152075,0.0009455001,0.009772435,0.006312025,0.017810196,0.003080075,0.0057450472,0.057445638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08548106,0.00054787187,0.0007284314,0.016695425,0.007624341,0.0073834877,0.0056431103,0.0039187805,0.008992543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003573358,0.000008271809,0.0012720654,0.00089940993,0.000033936314,0.0003286364,0.0011508834,0.00013456319,0.00007988886,0.20457135,0.6498011,0.14168426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069617467,0.0000045636266,0.001328333,0.001864715,0.000018396608,0.00013163718,0.00040248508,0.00005091203,0.00006669629,0.0074471785,0.98865986,0.000018237854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78852546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.859826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21147454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039966047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12718916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4254399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246492865","doi":"","title":"Is There a Tyranny of the Charter in Criminal Justice and Security Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Criminal justice; Temptation; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02036313857419476,"score_gpt":0.33710782809370854,"score_spread":0.3167446895195138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246492865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013410416,0.004688574,0.003489962,0.92655116,0.005624073,0.000030049569,0.00007504039,0.00009044791,0.04604028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64882976,0.0061149574,0.007866589,0.30966458,0.0067773988,0.00008615029,0.0001219127,0.00027583624,0.020262778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9480679,0.02251532,0.002239264,0.0063715423,0.01301443,0.0077915518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93028647,0.026494,0.012184671,0.0074062827,0.0144556,0.009173041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059658736,0.00038507924,0.0009778375,0.0018893867,0.011698207,0.025534844,0.0022884533,0.017903212,0.004762569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121000536,0.0007705829,0.0008420937,0.003120569,0.048937455,0.023029758,0.005285318,0.017810712,0.0013465701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007065013,0.00004940224,0.0037966839,0.00010783034,0.000028512475,0.0000910138,0.0026365884,0.00032109622,0.00019941502,0.870259,0.10180675,0.020633128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010135762,0.00015305303,0.008413066,0.0010252775,0.000069314294,0.0001581535,0.005843934,0.0009960168,0.001218294,0.43253598,0.54926443,0.00022117859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065153666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04403381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065153666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021945901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044973157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31550932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247805046","doi":"","title":"Keeping 'Reasonable Grounds' Meaningful","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Standard of review; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Certainty; Democracy; State (computer science); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05706473386376535,"score_gpt":0.2937734979247573,"score_spread":0.23670876406099198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247805046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0127517,0.004804868,0.15745822,0.27875927,0.011796937,0.0003738669,0.00043839845,0.00044232633,0.5331744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7722466,0.0021434492,0.061417997,0.11647754,0.0070905206,0.00077706797,0.00029773335,0.0005580036,0.038991135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9324054,0.025993485,0.0052085924,0.011735192,0.02076519,0.0038922033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8916105,0.057842758,0.0056401757,0.027494894,0.01476254,0.0026489985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06338484,0.0009743473,0.0025784958,0.002572403,0.007940916,0.02058321,0.006696479,0.026023533,0.00867937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20189315,0.0014963612,0.001729714,0.0016692256,0.041963123,0.029674195,0.010468626,0.03234596,0.0037447037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011048739,0.000012989266,0.0001100884,0.00004291221,0.000016020094,0.00008797912,0.0012965356,0.00013885203,0.000097150805,0.9821983,0.011088491,0.0048997537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018390227,0.000013519686,0.00014032834,0.0001547705,0.00002170174,0.000064222484,0.00039323373,0.00024113024,0.00021625598,0.8959867,0.10272262,0.00002714467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046441816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061761322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06338484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006806171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010078077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3352151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249886553","doi":"","title":"Across the Rubicon and into the Apennines: Privacy and Common Law Police Powers after A.M. and Kang-Brown","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Political science; Right to privacy; Geography","score_opus":0.009976294823833233,"score_gpt":0.313977231201031,"score_spread":0.3040009363771978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249886553","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04135336,0.02478256,0.0033247557,0.7857294,0.0022297024,0.000060992697,0.00022584602,0.000035993005,0.14225744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7009635,0.008488613,0.0018517164,0.19448853,0.0008700209,0.00004644804,0.000050187406,0.0000604877,0.09318044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994288,0.0010774715,0.0001699616,0.00085665856,0.0023845846,0.0012233839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941636,0.002790134,0.00019731911,0.00020103347,0.0020526163,0.0005953154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004295517,0.00035770156,0.00045011775,0.000880511,0.022621904,0.012062999,0.001463241,0.011849089,0.0025466525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011310671,0.00047470332,0.00052435865,0.001527912,0.033487428,0.0071201273,0.0025975248,0.015856959,0.00033936373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004299776,0.000013076212,0.0012706862,0.00003012436,0.000012477135,0.00032799004,0.01033197,0.00015336306,0.0002578299,0.90064174,0.07612413,0.010793634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043383636,0.000039939518,0.005969584,0.0004618957,0.00005534392,0.00016714027,0.032537255,0.0008381037,0.0015883875,0.35234067,0.6057567,0.00020160023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89696723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9253049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89696723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04148189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041619927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3009736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253119515","doi":"","title":"Surveilling the Stopgap","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Political science; Law; Parliament; Tempest; Government (linguistics); Politics; Computer security; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06028098316163124,"score_gpt":0.3042727295705397,"score_spread":0.24399174640890844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253119515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029462773,0.0100008985,0.020113343,0.50273967,0.008273959,0.00008734975,0.0008443691,0.0013995434,0.42707804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6738578,0.006980669,0.011452063,0.19688702,0.0035917012,0.00038526952,0.0010583719,0.0015619465,0.104225084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994027,0.0023156293,0.00024310441,0.00086539605,0.0012702047,0.0012786236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98394406,0.008894985,0.00085847016,0.0019408051,0.002061133,0.0023005272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008631585,0.00054802955,0.0007130284,0.0013593012,0.006252392,0.011530818,0.0018482264,0.009608649,0.03566187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051979233,0.00037032322,0.00052539475,0.0008369763,0.0070161233,0.013404927,0.011526515,0.0102489935,0.008802451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006317142,0.00003949259,0.0017895813,0.00019357017,0.000026415966,0.00082937506,0.004143004,0.0003107754,0.00047396874,0.63938516,0.29272696,0.060018502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021494881,0.000050109007,0.00073974824,0.00048121277,0.000022765083,0.00040293892,0.0039701634,0.00062626705,0.0006985205,0.20103937,0.79191375,0.000033637425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044466737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062383465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03566187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002157314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072553377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11930084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254021402","doi":"","title":"Duty, Causation and Third Party Perpetrators: The Bonnie Mooney Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Duty of care; Law; Duty; Harm; Tort; Criminology; Liability; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01463328706713153,"score_gpt":0.2819967522627262,"score_spread":0.2673634651955947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254021402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47911942,0.011609832,0.0013316089,0.15569699,0.0011009009,0.0001839748,0.00006303806,0.000041089686,0.35085315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94643945,0.0031018243,0.0003960349,0.025962194,0.00030013363,0.00015151399,0.000024205967,0.000030745054,0.023593865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929107,0.0019486303,0.00020279147,0.0005134322,0.0009885327,0.003435877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931201,0.003486837,0.0008219425,0.00035806108,0.00052341796,0.0016897139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070037628,0.000653016,0.0010338308,0.0021956435,0.036380816,0.008898038,0.0028959492,0.022196034,0.008272392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021034244,0.0010272107,0.00079878623,0.002064684,0.016431706,0.0048218053,0.011671054,0.015108084,0.0006324355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011506591,0.00029809843,0.02890038,0.00013972857,0.000048100737,0.049825005,0.084366426,0.00032021897,0.00033350926,0.7829099,0.03459441,0.018149115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035990242,0.00031984388,0.035992485,0.003737373,0.000337162,0.057455283,0.2744195,0.0020881814,0.0018988057,0.22506802,0.39785844,0.00046497653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14966634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21064413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14966634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008655615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013881712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29759037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254515376","doi":"10.71781/23620","title":"Analyse comparative de l'impact généré par l'existence du programme NAOMI sur les niveaux de commission d'actes criminels et incivils à Montréal et Vancouver","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17828725387295014,"score_gpt":0.4388510293696507,"score_spread":0.26056377549670057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254515376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788327,0.0035353107,0.0002793638,0.001886722,0.000049206257,0.00007483514,0.002814317,0.00002102737,0.012506565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866176,0.0012226502,0.00029552195,0.0001520422,0.000020204989,0.000063041945,0.00092393206,0.000011485017,0.010693486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274397,0.0035718929,0.00023013275,0.00051168323,0.0015048876,0.00143737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727453,0.016443308,0.0023046208,0.0006222108,0.0052489378,0.0026357097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004938196,0.0005438526,0.0010923237,0.0024111301,0.0014413876,0.003925222,0.0014453509,0.0010024704,0.008819734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02288244,0.0003772626,0.0011480072,0.0036331757,0.0016678179,0.0007906883,0.0027617917,0.0014728162,0.00041838232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022829275,0.00045287245,0.89841723,0.00045140256,0.0022783754,0.00032800608,0.005921833,0.0062443977,0.0008001286,0.0068058525,0.0036387302,0.0723782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057149573,0.00035841038,0.98933685,0.00013525388,0.00065731886,0.000023877508,0.0038213546,0.000925388,0.00027422875,0.00017870481,0.004215345,0.000016150692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9369196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95327747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06308037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022250816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023193987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16144174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254649385","doi":"","title":"The Principles of Fundamental Justice and s. 488.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Privilege (computing); Scrutiny; Supreme court; Political science; Confidentiality; Economic Justice; Parliament; Criminal code; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.105560486193494,"score_gpt":0.4068096936782019,"score_spread":0.3012492074847079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254649385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024700211,0.004940949,0.009673863,0.024616115,0.0015239652,0.00010900697,0.0003990025,0.00007354259,0.95619357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.278247,0.00596641,0.023989279,0.021385694,0.0025132871,0.00091801764,0.00050157064,0.0001890711,0.6662897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969072,0.0009350073,0.00015004675,0.00036792966,0.0011751762,0.00046463808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.0004220445,0.0001142353,0.00018365911,0.00029897798,0.000075849464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027648965,0.00059569284,0.00044609932,0.0012605289,0.0050698984,0.004936528,0.00088494783,0.007312131,0.01581218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058189556,0.00045562044,0.0006273202,0.0007516268,0.01222695,0.0028848092,0.0020164137,0.0065922756,0.005651108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003312314,0.0000035875298,0.00004111082,0.000010411398,9.0939e-7,0.000012288749,0.000264852,0.000037106118,0.000024317782,0.97750527,0.01852338,0.0035734908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010492815,0.000019077926,0.0005788845,0.00016294602,0.0000046644072,0.00009779162,0.00024788032,0.00018510892,0.00010620273,0.719984,0.27858672,0.000016271704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022903448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03666747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97709656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034865772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059339292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052897036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255146246","doi":"","title":"Using the Criminal Law, 1750-1850: Policing, Power and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Parliament; State (computer science); Politics; Power (physics); Criminal justice; Oppression; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.052827464539258365,"score_gpt":0.3295284260009131,"score_spread":0.27670096146165474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255146246","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17645864,0.40422648,0.0015169944,0.017207457,0.000915394,0.000046661524,0.00079582335,0.00003100609,0.3988016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159585,0.12848182,0.0011348913,0.0019533106,0.0008324544,0.000041841016,0.00037093932,0.000027882174,0.05119832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991492,0.00029262845,0.00006142314,0.00010256631,0.00019427022,0.00019988955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943274,0.00020928486,0.00012726909,0.000025840705,0.0001268548,0.000078026584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006693329,0.00036013074,0.00020123813,0.0050753397,0.0035071662,0.0045344224,0.000370088,0.00095946115,0.0023094367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019602645,0.00024774563,0.00017094138,0.005576426,0.010899746,0.0030737882,0.0015298359,0.0009593387,0.00052477367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055537963,0.0000708287,0.016178269,0.00057486945,0.000038072412,0.0005868644,0.10391239,0.00082908326,0.00020861175,0.69061923,0.041945934,0.14498036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005349969,0.000057833524,0.05712236,0.00096891687,0.000012736595,0.00037979276,0.01495128,0.00012109642,0.00014809094,0.03927814,0.8869208,0.00003358899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101300895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23500754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101300895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010570767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033830132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20142251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255281031","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2600272","title":"Googling 'Dunsmuir's Standards of Review' in the Evolution of Law Surrounding Substantive Judicial Review in Canadian Administrative Law: A Paradigmatic Peep and Many Thoughts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Administrative law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.055409092741845994,"score_gpt":0.3817138325936928,"score_spread":0.3263047398518468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255281031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042454386,0.00811661,0.009538273,0.9386601,0.0032972288,0.00005733307,0.00010238822,0.000073506555,0.03590911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4469191,0.0084063485,0.02562574,0.47639722,0.009667272,0.00026136407,0.00008113377,0.00036517734,0.032276694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9194423,0.03276189,0.004130244,0.008387251,0.028777555,0.0065007918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7913684,0.13336685,0.006994619,0.009790937,0.0488769,0.009602264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.098045036,0.00061595626,0.0014449478,0.0050034453,0.016728805,0.027919542,0.006088431,0.026213648,0.003967771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22884782,0.0010530223,0.000998158,0.005580113,0.09590017,0.018492471,0.005868378,0.026962487,0.000576323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018304338,0.00000762884,0.00032899788,0.00007965948,0.000012639264,0.000046531793,0.004029948,0.00019975769,0.00007109217,0.94072515,0.04713456,0.007345732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007706775,0.000032618973,0.0026131663,0.0008488548,0.00003831571,0.000070703674,0.0038294925,0.0008454342,0.0003307391,0.64779645,0.343286,0.00023113369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68689877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7447541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31310123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06570021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12420119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62989026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255318061","doi":"","title":"Do We Need a Parol Evidence Rule","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Mistake; Underdevelopment; Criticism; Law and economics; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05060742206206762,"score_gpt":0.3289836783727825,"score_spread":0.27837625631071483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255318061","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016279567,0.004789618,0.14387637,0.5091928,0.008542175,0.00031739072,0.0009672281,0.00054106006,0.31549367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57779425,0.0038343044,0.092115246,0.26889583,0.012460534,0.0009562483,0.0005373111,0.0005410591,0.042865194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96778125,0.009117888,0.0022758413,0.00865786,0.008921035,0.0032461216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92675936,0.044325598,0.004699432,0.010977529,0.010801888,0.0024361901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03915904,0.0007872315,0.0039466904,0.0019594007,0.005705472,0.007951309,0.0053710267,0.022729406,0.018694883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17477395,0.0014861984,0.0023624033,0.0013217649,0.025750708,0.04270664,0.0047109895,0.025432166,0.010246179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039019218,0.000017461161,0.0003468484,0.00008950944,0.000024450224,0.0001529838,0.0003970119,0.00013043037,0.00009337649,0.975443,0.018297998,0.0049678884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042178915,0.000017645667,0.0002214695,0.00012129892,0.000016370575,0.0002140011,0.00025848197,0.00044032309,0.00020221356,0.9648695,0.03356032,0.00003630271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005721348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056577055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03915904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028020313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068406537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20709532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255455827","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1979210","title":"The Niqab and Witness Testimony: Balancing the Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Law; Psychology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.018690705257834953,"score_gpt":0.3140327712100625,"score_spread":0.29534206595222756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255455827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047421057,0.012744455,0.018757865,0.37109995,0.0017850399,0.00016971781,0.00011906219,0.0000335896,0.54786927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905096,0.0043094675,0.008213507,0.053987406,0.0012884632,0.0002730954,0.000043409247,0.000060458085,0.026728136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9197985,0.058864187,0.0025021997,0.0027458232,0.012304066,0.0037852668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8302437,0.13657583,0.004996856,0.006693429,0.0143495845,0.007140648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08413276,0.00029602993,0.0011801061,0.0029193067,0.008746174,0.015549553,0.002681163,0.013192444,0.014978825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21048006,0.00071132457,0.00043564447,0.0012676808,0.01309235,0.010568788,0.011816416,0.011520491,0.0024645433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020377162,0.00009033976,0.0055343434,0.00027237507,0.000059754515,0.0003528007,0.006578814,0.00017949166,0.0004912388,0.88192797,0.025261115,0.0790479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017610092,0.00020079064,0.008789359,0.0029244318,0.00016247439,0.0013868079,0.01847549,0.002068966,0.0012180434,0.6868908,0.27760568,0.00010107978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056912983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020530405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08413276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068832687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018959349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44494188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255920396","doi":"","title":"R v Hart: A Welcome New Emphasis on Reliability and Admissibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reliability (semiconductor); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics; Power (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.024346094017009906,"score_gpt":0.3208968020501407,"score_spread":0.29655070803313077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255920396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003163497,0.030891176,0.031152325,0.8629041,0.014607787,0.000059706203,0.00021494817,0.00022830762,0.05677822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24020344,0.028445445,0.05892072,0.55805373,0.06588273,0.00024185277,0.00027358872,0.0011461109,0.046832383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89699197,0.027975854,0.0064618867,0.011805723,0.052693263,0.004071283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7406467,0.1850838,0.0050494564,0.020337863,0.042951148,0.005931078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10032243,0.0010657193,0.0031639165,0.003926048,0.0058937334,0.021109993,0.007157135,0.022731058,0.005369603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1952338,0.0012377129,0.0019744365,0.002724252,0.073841214,0.026341323,0.008644206,0.063224606,0.001432499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004407608,0.0000146126085,0.00037057087,0.00017292134,0.000033244996,0.00017145477,0.0015975361,0.00016125466,0.00031885004,0.86971307,0.09641302,0.030989246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059387552,0.000079791316,0.0013458341,0.0012022496,0.00007105008,0.0003564487,0.0009094349,0.0007655121,0.00059188926,0.6140435,0.38038316,0.00019172036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087217815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14449573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10032243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017818354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024378195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53056204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256065387","doi":"","title":"Introduction - The Human Rights Revolution in Criminal Evidence and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Torture; Presumption of innocence; International human rights law; Political science; Common law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Right to a fair trial; Sociology","score_opus":0.028444114663867308,"score_gpt":0.3279999851622667,"score_spread":0.2995558704983994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256065387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087438105,0.05583436,0.013849079,0.11440213,0.019090766,0.00025776032,0.00072344666,0.00020515567,0.7868935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25247273,0.048334043,0.012893036,0.06328874,0.020779362,0.0005166742,0.000693888,0.0003392083,0.60068226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982141,0.00065710914,0.0000780856,0.00025145785,0.00066390546,0.00013535903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692374,0.0022498704,0.00013026586,0.00018076434,0.00037086222,0.00014446863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016878736,0.00030730505,0.00024357818,0.0007506838,0.0026361146,0.0045859553,0.00086432905,0.0025648386,0.022880048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040351674,0.0002207248,0.00029450696,0.0009024285,0.006479002,0.004153594,0.002574588,0.006092426,0.0040586167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014461217,0.00003172459,0.00031127644,0.00044709945,0.000002698882,0.00014177477,0.015828695,0.00011848256,0.00036049174,0.7261195,0.2101986,0.046425205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020338023,0.000029513147,0.0006553544,0.00066014647,0.0000012911272,0.00015168794,0.0017600885,0.00004390846,0.00008625018,0.04490605,0.95169735,0.000006191438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022690909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00279957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022880048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002667287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019852757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076541364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256370955","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Law of Evidence: Plus Ça Change…?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14357124532806942,"score_gpt":0.3258891899508425,"score_spread":0.18231794462277306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256370955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005886135,0.046901863,0.023529463,0.8550722,0.006175889,0.000040486346,0.0001553967,0.00013505954,0.062103506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.603101,0.041201763,0.050584443,0.23484133,0.030036924,0.00028728053,0.000213826,0.00044149673,0.039291892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97336763,0.012275129,0.0014134765,0.004862409,0.0067795357,0.0013017267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9409043,0.0355942,0.0022456066,0.009012107,0.009858297,0.0023854736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043108862,0.0007748611,0.0013426119,0.0033205573,0.004880063,0.017160874,0.0030885509,0.012885126,0.005627636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075996086,0.0010076565,0.0010847404,0.0020697196,0.09415596,0.04227602,0.006939647,0.026905969,0.0017170077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020028565,0.0000142956815,0.00023544488,0.00008167194,0.000013547469,0.000034171066,0.00067584583,0.00014648202,0.00009591147,0.9709344,0.008941407,0.01880681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024588862,0.000032865148,0.0004550806,0.0003638208,0.0000114499535,0.00011783803,0.00069450034,0.00035410226,0.00015580797,0.7995077,0.19823919,0.000043160395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011448639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007752444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043108862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01375249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010653522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22798419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256806795","doi":"","title":"Public Interest Immunity after Bill C-36","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Preamble; Public interest; Terrorism; Secession; Sovereign immunity; Bill of rights; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.184133385017116,"score_gpt":0.3956970407353083,"score_spread":0.2115636557181923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256806795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038767585,0.0012444666,0.0005429822,0.06474721,0.008078968,0.00022649395,0.0021910788,0.00067312125,0.918419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017231891,0.0003037918,0.0003624169,0.046851058,0.0020049799,0.00019662705,0.0008310942,0.00017001941,0.9320482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961791,0.00031578232,0.00017045399,0.00049447827,0.0015271568,0.0013130044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565375,0.0012881341,0.00017139075,0.00074450945,0.0016169887,0.00052523456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028973583,0.00075514865,0.0008267309,0.0013339365,0.0044069155,0.005648611,0.0016851054,0.023302449,0.152173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016787961,0.00071230275,0.0015086533,0.0009083746,0.0011667286,0.0019086692,0.0022589325,0.009090211,0.08510031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008193358,0.000065260625,0.0003906669,0.000044402386,0.000010245033,0.00023649618,0.00014251674,0.00006575346,0.00043986755,0.05986045,0.9256249,0.013037526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000324291,0.000041754112,0.0024876883,0.00011666168,0.000013612446,0.00013436131,0.00008733832,0.00013191026,0.00037354458,0.0054391045,0.99111813,0.000023504705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023315618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031737264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034321637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006713027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5090694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257134394","doi":"","title":"The Evolving Test for Stays of Proceedings","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Test (biology); Prejudice (legal term); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02508658694503403,"score_gpt":0.3007706753364625,"score_spread":0.2756840883914285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257134394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06128233,0.013439819,0.059836466,0.34487274,0.007910569,0.00024333478,0.0010866841,0.00043225926,0.51089585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785131,0.0024472366,0.019646853,0.05700873,0.004572783,0.00060124387,0.00047913947,0.0003176895,0.03641323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95316374,0.017424095,0.0026250598,0.008506687,0.014269413,0.0040110606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9079762,0.061654463,0.0060407,0.007517389,0.010868041,0.005943124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036468238,0.00054275966,0.0017121906,0.002913595,0.010063155,0.01356661,0.0058752056,0.014033529,0.024262732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18403476,0.0005242212,0.0013104292,0.0022786073,0.04101311,0.027288107,0.010896642,0.01837033,0.0018621987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007973367,0.000015770542,0.001121373,0.000040169878,0.000015235764,0.0000691963,0.00082787866,0.000081219325,0.00007096206,0.97292894,0.010738818,0.014010669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083736464,0.00019480307,0.0021685201,0.0003850917,0.00006038454,0.00019859464,0.0027306778,0.0008858511,0.0004938773,0.88634354,0.10636774,0.00008706294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01012049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007988913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036468238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008507876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013804801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19286478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257617230","doi":"","title":"Les principes de justices fondamentale en matière de sécurité nationale (Principles of Fundamental Justice in National Security)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.039495793520413956,"score_gpt":0.343872322105937,"score_spread":0.30437652858552305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257617230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04415901,0.02752818,0.013429041,0.06865505,0.0012883943,0.00013845324,0.00033255518,0.0000861782,0.8443831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8556007,0.006283126,0.0054409043,0.00708493,0.0006217344,0.00016946353,0.00010624586,0.000032314623,0.12466063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974511,0.0012335572,0.00009555568,0.00024061996,0.0005250018,0.0004541081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989919,0.00045164934,0.00013265878,0.00009115687,0.0002602515,0.00007243304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004331255,0.00043132593,0.00026063557,0.000910452,0.004678988,0.0068383804,0.00061927835,0.0034388881,0.004369506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031493786,0.00024797296,0.00045563764,0.0007447799,0.0117673185,0.0024953056,0.0017326453,0.003343765,0.0006246599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050676576,0.0000048408483,0.00023627449,0.000026796537,0.0000021804394,0.000027243945,0.0020358735,0.0002287807,0.000050257644,0.98629236,0.007335263,0.003755042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002316001,0.000052239393,0.0070280847,0.00038311153,0.00001197942,0.00016566772,0.0030166665,0.0008361783,0.00035860235,0.5571196,0.43097118,0.000033533637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090198494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13448206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090198494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012180073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011585348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17934692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257657705","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0008","title":"privacy’s second home: Building a New Home for Privacy Under Section 15 of the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Guard (computer science); Information privacy; Right to privacy; Law; Enforcement; Section (typography); Privacy law; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Human rights; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.069157753108154,"score_gpt":0.30974649138274274,"score_spread":0.24058873827458874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257657705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009307901,0.0038527232,0.015332536,0.046202905,0.0010008047,0.00016825336,0.0001620503,0.00016673558,0.9238062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47908354,0.0049068555,0.02503029,0.02425107,0.00054579735,0.00026960514,0.00027677964,0.00017004057,0.46546605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943153,0.0010125434,0.00012434712,0.0004600366,0.0026977619,0.0013899131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974548,0.00074720255,0.00013508256,0.0002875757,0.0009701618,0.00040520902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005341763,0.0002526852,0.0003271196,0.0010228062,0.0069359383,0.009666405,0.0016573786,0.0047309394,0.006991003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050165686,0.00032477287,0.00056064315,0.0010558923,0.017509345,0.00514758,0.0035716933,0.0067882696,0.00094141735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028815778,0.0000056095632,0.00012156478,0.000010707096,7.297404e-7,0.00005637018,0.0016985827,0.00011598598,0.000037639733,0.9706125,0.021213524,0.0061240257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009573192,0.0000133967615,0.00080497365,0.00026555063,0.0000071394693,0.000114135895,0.0020879856,0.00052394776,0.00036932257,0.16447163,0.8313026,0.000029823661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65220773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69957286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34779227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03419411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08870977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6996809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257775551","doi":"","title":"Setting Standards: Evidence, Proof and the Certification Motion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Plaintiff; Class action; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Action (physics); Law; Summary judgment; Burden of proof; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.04930555754490166,"score_gpt":0.3212158796490763,"score_spread":0.2719103221041746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257775551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012769162,0.043725587,0.10498532,0.5720083,0.0034219373,0.00028095362,0.00024136696,0.00014116513,0.2624262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.759204,0.015563828,0.07935713,0.1159102,0.0026593679,0.00048464138,0.00018691673,0.00016808017,0.026465883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9447098,0.022109935,0.003292465,0.005557558,0.020698179,0.0036320551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9171443,0.05788978,0.004507938,0.004109714,0.013952986,0.0023952336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07078298,0.001220275,0.0013785274,0.006703101,0.012990095,0.02398954,0.0055299257,0.026646031,0.0049585593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13513497,0.0012666344,0.0010831614,0.0037499105,0.08173911,0.024516689,0.010146275,0.020645209,0.0010315257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003828379,0.000005422714,0.00009396325,0.000030452065,0.000003956415,0.000034726407,0.0004373681,0.00010110401,0.00002315224,0.990589,0.0044310344,0.004245896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028927248,0.000018172834,0.00039445347,0.0005699686,0.000013067251,0.00007442985,0.0009153994,0.00034150388,0.00021527361,0.93327844,0.06409446,0.000055846915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18989675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19667016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18989675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03639544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061311774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3775829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257981024","doi":"","title":"Smith and the Supreme Court: Implications for Sentencing Policy and Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Law; Sentencing guidelines; Reform Act; Charter; Vision; Sentence; Commission; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03130250775665623,"score_gpt":0.3259870783984141,"score_spread":0.2946845706417579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257981024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025022648,0.016128438,0.0034990248,0.81731313,0.0016849856,0.00011438621,0.000089349014,0.00011430748,0.13603371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7737083,0.013206708,0.0055393656,0.14700261,0.002947141,0.00019642258,0.00007799081,0.000049648013,0.057271816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716675,0.009993661,0.0010340944,0.0026088464,0.0075432225,0.0071525797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98419803,0.008820391,0.0010002136,0.000542015,0.0036506217,0.0017888005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021091308,0.0004566157,0.0009417506,0.0027422013,0.014587101,0.01845034,0.004248533,0.020011233,0.0072146845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053794272,0.0007629422,0.0011709912,0.0029288728,0.025656607,0.011065897,0.0045751585,0.012362755,0.0005246781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124235285,0.000020342304,0.00023033856,0.000042088257,0.000007916743,0.00007784947,0.0010507129,0.0008307421,0.0000645364,0.97349924,0.01497815,0.00918574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012577887,0.00014277427,0.0043077418,0.00072265934,0.00010541539,0.00014264362,0.0059799454,0.0046498594,0.0006279421,0.72745967,0.2555601,0.00017544125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5479138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52284545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5479138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078645475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.120994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90949726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258099037","doi":"10.29173/alr382","title":"Improving Wrongful Conviction Review: Lessons from a Comparative Analysis of Continental Criminal Procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Criminal law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.10539955246626069,"score_gpt":0.40427462869686653,"score_spread":0.29887507623060583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258099037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29686418,0.41490585,0.016753873,0.09018233,0.0013903588,0.0011761987,0.0008496897,0.00015367019,0.17772382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318027,0.043683786,0.015387857,0.0054438375,0.00031717608,0.00044701702,0.00031804034,0.00006103524,0.0025386368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79594094,0.16424684,0.009189854,0.0038070257,0.021688258,0.005127082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55738646,0.31886235,0.015118849,0.015262362,0.08930222,0.0040677646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1432946,0.00027859776,0.0015883537,0.020236937,0.005179467,0.008605393,0.0031151075,0.0024054549,0.002507236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3398042,0.00046785778,0.0009323655,0.02804749,0.008900941,0.0067726346,0.005156039,0.0016251218,0.00014362452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068210944,0.0002339035,0.043919984,0.008718245,0.0014946599,0.0005197786,0.06561345,0.0022396166,0.0004447895,0.3745233,0.027024468,0.47458565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040593662,0.0012465385,0.33630306,0.026313545,0.0030374457,0.0010515468,0.12167139,0.004012942,0.0016806473,0.07755627,0.42627877,0.0004418435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25945926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48076826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95717925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042820767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05084747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75782335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258436064","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3244","title":"Polycentricity and queue jumping in public law remedies: A two-track response","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polycentricity; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Sociology; Negotiation; Legislature; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05971884230427966,"score_gpt":0.30081584581321086,"score_spread":0.2410970035089312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258436064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051435903,0.0036966368,0.010651122,0.83322245,0.002496939,0.00007876852,0.00008552362,0.0001305269,0.09820203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62973154,0.0025574733,0.0027414158,0.32795057,0.003440157,0.00013236185,0.000048601163,0.000119471595,0.033278365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836377,0.0046018003,0.0007613894,0.002840784,0.0050997455,0.0030586529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97216,0.019289216,0.0025881266,0.001645038,0.0031212633,0.0011963227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017187605,0.0005781672,0.0007055797,0.0016147699,0.013964065,0.013220912,0.003298918,0.027145484,0.008736799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0374985,0.000709714,0.0013520934,0.001792592,0.036411297,0.020635348,0.01575597,0.032138523,0.0006493893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029178367,0.000033065568,0.0009878952,0.000061991435,0.000011818529,0.00045444243,0.012188302,0.00029418617,0.00023689709,0.9281397,0.048819717,0.00874289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013535007,0.00012210682,0.00401112,0.00055199733,0.000048898684,0.0005997769,0.027642542,0.0017345259,0.0011638117,0.26417628,0.6996056,0.00020810409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034045946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039150186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034045946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014948854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01264973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108462036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258502979","doi":"","title":"Our Evolving Judicature: Security Certificates, Detention Review, and the Federal Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutionality; Civil liberties; Immigration detention; Terrorism; National security; Supreme court; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.014131244572268494,"score_gpt":0.29330720471966504,"score_spread":0.27917596014739654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258502979","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028406383,0.038241263,0.0044588586,0.83810693,0.0018967704,0.000032188287,0.00005847938,0.000058200414,0.08874086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82697284,0.010496682,0.0033246225,0.14578055,0.0035406968,0.000043008386,0.000033116103,0.00006610704,0.009742447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95112675,0.01749745,0.0018156741,0.005152858,0.01572041,0.008686746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92017764,0.054814223,0.0037495329,0.0022961642,0.0110016605,0.007960769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043282032,0.00041358866,0.0010117139,0.005222873,0.03061313,0.035165805,0.005692305,0.026713695,0.00313246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084792584,0.00079908466,0.0007432653,0.005454554,0.093528494,0.0136235785,0.006191294,0.028175907,0.00034262778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017484686,0.000013379255,0.00095957966,0.000039644903,0.000011064852,0.00013992467,0.0051895985,0.00024698774,0.0000750742,0.96706766,0.012401871,0.0138376625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006957113,0.000074955926,0.009633155,0.0015403605,0.00009751997,0.00032298136,0.018365948,0.0018600764,0.00061882596,0.64411676,0.32300928,0.00029062296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75711364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7965955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75711364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13610096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13371292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98748624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258880212","doi":"","title":"On the Improvement of China’s Community Correction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Imprisonment; Legislation; Enforcement; Communism; Political science; Doctrine; Law; International community; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0744186931725974,"score_gpt":0.33296907932748565,"score_spread":0.25855038615488823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258880212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7842753,0.009935379,0.015227902,0.078703344,0.0012205582,0.0012714749,0.0007486322,0.0007241699,0.107893206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97701025,0.0019383951,0.0052436814,0.0027527916,0.00017798641,0.00014527034,0.00031904955,0.000023016979,0.012389565],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525094,0.0010258249,0.00034518272,0.00036419046,0.0016737775,0.0013400962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414104,0.0006689292,0.0008759372,0.0003619701,0.0029534702,0.0009986035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004657698,0.000340085,0.00023420707,0.002514936,0.004252196,0.0021702822,0.0014028342,0.0012015536,0.0037407135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008691009,0.0001633209,0.0004381596,0.0018906947,0.0013597957,0.0016519286,0.0024640781,0.0010197307,0.00023877813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018569341,0.00044482196,0.25566176,0.001585329,0.00016115009,0.0015392418,0.008841496,0.005506384,0.0054323985,0.16652867,0.067444496,0.4866686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001588291,0.00047994358,0.68712145,0.00093287416,0.00019388144,0.0005162456,0.007495944,0.010259062,0.0039694477,0.013159212,0.2755368,0.00017639055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13705695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20681514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13705695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007804589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060533915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2725184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259074632","doi":"","title":"Problems with the Newly Expanded Power of Citizen's Arrest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01577623504199432,"score_gpt":0.27708069868237517,"score_spread":0.26130446364038085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259074632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056751065,0.004107384,0.00554201,0.7314834,0.005893462,0.00009584944,0.00039420542,0.00019169475,0.19554093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.706801,0.0028309457,0.0046047796,0.22525647,0.012488509,0.00030036215,0.00027834618,0.0003599705,0.047079667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96494585,0.012569335,0.002436191,0.0055734986,0.010519354,0.0039557377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8735531,0.08477235,0.0040762373,0.009280925,0.020924134,0.0073931566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052895546,0.00029928546,0.0010602302,0.0032553168,0.009140447,0.0102015985,0.0061806524,0.015830787,0.015907556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16360556,0.0007237907,0.0010947644,0.0024068202,0.013127269,0.011865257,0.0065373606,0.024706822,0.0024987939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014320172,0.00017133249,0.016693689,0.00027946103,0.0001079985,0.001190871,0.01445116,0.0006519059,0.00059447606,0.58491594,0.24231797,0.13848206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018643186,0.0002708114,0.05342094,0.0020863167,0.00016266243,0.00316242,0.019171359,0.0023159652,0.0009120099,0.21200913,0.705969,0.000332957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03875621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09143804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052895546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00799343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015595591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2797417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259100371","doi":"10.3917/rffp.132.0053","title":"Les droits garantis par la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés dans l’administration et l’application du régime fiscal","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française de finances publiques.","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Political science; Sanctions; Law; Constitution; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035146741824086884,"score_gpt":0.30702927813448927,"score_spread":0.2718825363104024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259100371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011470964,0.006892796,0.006636153,0.024187718,0.0017083156,0.00018639279,0.0016367056,0.00027170836,0.94700927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23262933,0.0062884395,0.009006465,0.009513525,0.00033422757,0.00028958218,0.0014590331,0.00022383429,0.7402556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925648,0.0010339767,0.0001968493,0.0008991981,0.0038257618,0.0014794171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621695,0.00056949223,0.0002647316,0.00038532552,0.0019311954,0.00063225784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610962,0.00061811635,0.0004985183,0.0021384412,0.008344707,0.0133492,0.0012905452,0.002902425,0.025441254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076360353,0.00040044406,0.0005190854,0.0035103604,0.0077074138,0.0024342258,0.002761366,0.006576126,0.0033167342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023350609,0.000013426722,0.00096332526,0.00008033225,0.000008242135,0.00006548647,0.002577349,0.00034570755,0.0003398886,0.93231946,0.049739975,0.0135234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000966131,0.00001159762,0.0034902098,0.00015208531,0.0000082524,0.000048896396,0.0008583791,0.00014360134,0.00017989943,0.016573329,0.9784883,0.00003565994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8801017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9459914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11989832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053193036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12801923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38594425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259148470","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years of the Charter and Criminal Justice: A Dialogue between aCharter Optimist, a Charter Realist and a Charter Sceptic","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Ambiguity; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.033901561681655396,"score_gpt":0.2928578853237201,"score_spread":0.25895632364206467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259148470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037437633,0.029928572,0.008645124,0.77893585,0.005788633,0.000033307406,0.00002886287,0.00007495282,0.13912706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87433493,0.011554816,0.004215554,0.07429626,0.0041700164,0.0000760402,0.000017698087,0.00014480212,0.031189919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600051,0.03079073,0.000652536,0.001253108,0.0052226232,0.0020759285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93015915,0.058654036,0.0032793581,0.0019724986,0.0033454348,0.002589462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03422423,0.00041648914,0.0006455696,0.0016730042,0.015765801,0.025880076,0.001680081,0.011104416,0.0023372564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059656143,0.00055868516,0.00041269563,0.0014120929,0.07338588,0.020022145,0.007851006,0.024496125,0.00028915398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003161606,0.000023944753,0.00019365264,0.000027017695,0.0000039733154,0.00010043462,0.033041302,0.00027168135,0.00006106389,0.93358254,0.023281084,0.009381816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004372194,0.00008485732,0.00072759733,0.00045184052,0.000011566371,0.000108865264,0.031083507,0.0006824602,0.0003305592,0.40239516,0.5639778,0.0001021218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015456048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015745193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03422423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015495657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016614815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1809972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259243144","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Canada’s Legal Aid Crisis: Breaching the Right to State-Funded Counsel within a Reasonable Time","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; Charter; Constitutional right; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; State (computer science); Representation (politics); Criminal procedure; Constitution; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.008845543556325292,"score_gpt":0.2649118013732611,"score_spread":0.2560662578169358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259243144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15491278,0.005879588,0.003981843,0.45500892,0.0008056322,0.0000904818,0.00038470555,0.000087448,0.37884858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420439,0.0015403981,0.0013915355,0.031814255,0.00021235844,0.000032071173,0.00006487038,0.000025511303,0.022875024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309313,0.0008122478,0.00011783051,0.00032729603,0.0029677458,0.0026818137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299884,0.0023597213,0.0006106958,0.00030705755,0.0020179765,0.0017057215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032208012,0.00021193628,0.00036640212,0.0010620437,0.011558116,0.011019099,0.002036388,0.006515903,0.008533197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014520171,0.0003003213,0.00037165903,0.0009999684,0.0069556823,0.0034084695,0.00352517,0.007026518,0.0004556168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011626952,0.00007486334,0.011563225,0.00011251229,0.000037800208,0.0015132801,0.005090748,0.0024217989,0.000649645,0.84090734,0.088815086,0.048697483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018712146,0.00023681206,0.04678698,0.0012687108,0.00022488972,0.0019599833,0.028601538,0.007851935,0.0022320433,0.17164803,0.73867494,0.00032700485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91332006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94629604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062110763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11751779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45064723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259265551","doi":"","title":"Tracking 'Terrorists' or Solidifying Tereotypes? Canada's Anti--Terrorism Act in Light of the Charter's Equality Guarantee","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Legislation; Law; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Charter; Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; History","score_opus":0.030528518366668218,"score_gpt":0.3108468360752404,"score_spread":0.2803183177085722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259265551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2328187,0.007771161,0.011824007,0.24541931,0.0017603354,0.00030559354,0.0029373753,0.00025954415,0.496904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493027,0.003364008,0.006678476,0.019233152,0.00017853992,0.000044326,0.00041837676,0.00005834961,0.12072217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946109,0.00047588465,0.00008434875,0.00048133332,0.0023925412,0.0019550123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958688,0.00067235075,0.00045557137,0.00032683555,0.0018770298,0.00079947256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037281127,0.00025214007,0.00026792235,0.0011441387,0.008901694,0.008396434,0.0012908248,0.0024746058,0.0041381395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008964189,0.00022900659,0.00021079481,0.0017910779,0.006782556,0.00342775,0.001809931,0.002983216,0.00036720466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052359115,0.000032676562,0.025415441,0.00010871401,0.000010902834,0.00021654328,0.017795475,0.00079935184,0.0009106985,0.7620824,0.10510465,0.087470695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022216629,0.00006211608,0.09331261,0.0004123793,0.000046159166,0.000115162926,0.03233636,0.0019198454,0.0024506233,0.042787395,0.82637274,0.00016243132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98244447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99212027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043484032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043484032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12870002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3155002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259649106","doi":"","title":"To the Rescue: Antonio Lamer and the Section 2(B) Cases from Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Cornerstone; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Freedom of expression; Political science; Expression (computer science); Sociology; History; Human rights; Business; Computer science; Archaeology; Advertising","score_opus":0.014922832080666824,"score_gpt":0.2971762142766932,"score_spread":0.2822533821960264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259649106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17171738,0.028995011,0.00055427523,0.3466417,0.0020766538,0.0001479495,0.0009937509,0.00004150603,0.4488318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76248914,0.010409081,0.0004670027,0.07970466,0.0005628781,0.00008493663,0.00032073053,0.000061760074,0.14589985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958333,0.00074888824,0.000061700084,0.00026104154,0.0008790431,0.002215952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996367,0.0012457799,0.00024570007,0.00013377948,0.0012133695,0.00079429406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002868963,0.00043843657,0.0005417676,0.001890863,0.029797813,0.0066581117,0.0029323434,0.00878289,0.009742414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007637026,0.0004441263,0.0005991646,0.002689965,0.007352258,0.0019238502,0.0029393074,0.007333716,0.00070258474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017736646,0.00016207984,0.024058072,0.00019924888,0.000088285065,0.010488706,0.049358595,0.0013683909,0.0005108405,0.28277624,0.6004934,0.030318802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012256326,0.00006335316,0.07917192,0.0012629458,0.00012747274,0.0018798447,0.11988797,0.0011675907,0.00055428373,0.019890873,0.77554744,0.00032365374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07970206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07970206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08442747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57828164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259780296","doi":"","title":"The Trial Judge's Duty to Give Reasons for Judgment in Criminal Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Conviction; Supreme court; Law; Acquittal; Jury; Political science; Jury trial; Credibility; Trial court; Psychology","score_opus":0.11588454233110357,"score_gpt":0.4600192935085334,"score_spread":0.3441347511774298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259780296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013048263,0.00925726,0.010364299,0.30705568,0.01668389,0.00049404125,0.0005296767,0.00026619798,0.64230067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53118515,0.008209489,0.015590571,0.18972038,0.009506392,0.0008734819,0.0004283028,0.00040477057,0.24408147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93155974,0.026006974,0.010282142,0.0037341306,0.022044528,0.0063724774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8497396,0.10150557,0.0063256794,0.014017359,0.022051824,0.006359977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041813295,0.00038089207,0.0014539963,0.0019488169,0.009460397,0.011784077,0.0035361836,0.032680746,0.013624218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2973531,0.001037262,0.0009638163,0.0015437176,0.010900713,0.0059808744,0.004581602,0.017382026,0.010488655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014676848,0.000069282454,0.0013687819,0.00035118443,0.00002983583,0.0011225091,0.006558896,0.00019862207,0.0005102455,0.31862226,0.61055326,0.060468365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018142315,0.00009834098,0.0045235013,0.0028100025,0.00008852794,0.0025500704,0.004806399,0.0009463237,0.0011816744,0.2135353,0.7691024,0.00017612785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017054556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027605807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041813295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034306198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027154313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22113252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260082425","doi":"","title":"Ten Ways to Improve Canadian Anti-Terrorism Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Conviction; Criminal law; National security; Immigration law; State (computer science); Immigration","score_opus":0.023104908033760457,"score_gpt":0.28016981903306787,"score_spread":0.2570649109993074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260082425","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015341885,0.009566264,0.016644703,0.5501256,0.0039838706,0.0010784477,0.00079044915,0.001003691,0.40146506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42552972,0.019770509,0.11836336,0.2650238,0.0018476085,0.0011917492,0.0016495823,0.0003727649,0.16625081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697519,0.0053682975,0.0010735571,0.001650885,0.015399326,0.0067559914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650494,0.0056351786,0.00083178404,0.0022491873,0.021615649,0.0046188193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0230489,0.0014207392,0.00071136764,0.0059749014,0.016327886,0.015122864,0.004459188,0.010100289,0.012229437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048903808,0.00086598966,0.0015166497,0.004870261,0.014000841,0.007864688,0.0075370832,0.011261352,0.0013540798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007043948,0.00016274441,0.004691026,0.0005536728,0.00005945735,0.00046636732,0.0053572385,0.0032680188,0.0006759724,0.69024783,0.20524782,0.08919942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014538712,0.00008709698,0.009931898,0.0012496222,0.0001532532,0.0001710379,0.007811532,0.0027968327,0.0011878618,0.086120404,0.8901012,0.00024407812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9596641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96808237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10493964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10493964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3468051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7613939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260291965","doi":"","title":"“The Relevance of Prior Record in the Criminal Law: A Response to the Theory of Professor von Hirsch”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04442344463517078,"score_gpt":0.3273808466940629,"score_spread":0.28295740205889214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260291965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00135503,0.0031746132,0.001188878,0.98947364,0.0018154945,0.0000061068467,0.000034816232,0.000007835449,0.0029435637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0937147,0.0060444693,0.002840267,0.85361624,0.03879141,0.00006559355,0.000057034384,0.000060581035,0.004809783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860182,0.005664866,0.0011128782,0.0029855564,0.003353881,0.00086460036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76433486,0.21375659,0.006119914,0.0042253467,0.00939274,0.0021705888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02622643,0.0005715779,0.0020545148,0.0030130509,0.0068691727,0.008457882,0.005708104,0.05300877,0.0046923533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14662738,0.0011543164,0.0016324508,0.0034204654,0.047598105,0.023007974,0.004623041,0.049278524,0.0011051123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010823028,0.00003610923,0.0007830667,0.00017587439,0.000038518734,0.000493354,0.0032500483,0.00034951323,0.00010371711,0.7861811,0.197675,0.010805537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008650384,0.000034860066,0.0011909177,0.00063675595,0.000052356518,0.000468521,0.002119775,0.0010516639,0.00047630363,0.83996475,0.15379536,0.00012221739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010336285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010655456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05300877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006112518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007909828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1387003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260816901","doi":"","title":"Catastrophic Threats and the Fourth Amendment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Search and seizure; Supreme court; Harm; Reasonable suspicion; Law; Probable cause; Wonder; Political science; Element (criminal law); Government (linguistics); Terrorism; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053051317637785714,"score_gpt":0.38498951027609657,"score_spread":0.33193819263831087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260816901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02312444,0.006776356,0.010591813,0.052340433,0.0013519793,0.0001422274,0.00019745226,0.00016314385,0.9053122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86358374,0.002708308,0.0052390783,0.044707388,0.0018209321,0.000681269,0.00014626083,0.00007076571,0.081042215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98557216,0.004541767,0.0006413365,0.0021671285,0.0034637058,0.003613783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890098,0.006571558,0.001041378,0.0016369292,0.0012404883,0.00049976783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299377,0.0006460337,0.00069481187,0.0013456822,0.0077481833,0.010785605,0.002190017,0.014410442,0.008599996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0209184,0.0006165419,0.0014033882,0.0010034613,0.02640905,0.0046683983,0.0055104266,0.012817116,0.0015136019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050489894,0.0000064592214,0.00008377932,0.000010458267,0.0000028744632,0.000058091486,0.00017597336,0.00011716016,0.00003797168,0.99616313,0.002200113,0.0011389592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051858075,0.0000637847,0.0006772627,0.00020767239,0.000018001252,0.00021352152,0.00037246273,0.0008293993,0.0002708494,0.8723093,0.12493314,0.00005277639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008637487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059953746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014410442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075664697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009181084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06871843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261008081","doi":"","title":"The need for clarity on whether 'suspects' may rely on section 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 : a comparative law analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; CLARITY; Law; Adversarial system; Duty; Political science; Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); The Republic; Constitutional law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09916064664287683,"score_gpt":0.3490144440462874,"score_spread":0.24985379740341057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261008081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13172941,0.044262808,0.017533863,0.25302178,0.0010347497,0.00012894085,0.00021237618,0.000034808338,0.55204135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96612877,0.008255209,0.0036630016,0.014704752,0.00031720006,0.00009742912,0.000062920684,0.000025450732,0.0067453883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835624,0.010148057,0.00067396765,0.0010332239,0.0027694772,0.0018129605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949374,0.045070127,0.0016067444,0.001077783,0.0024927622,0.00037859927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0246556,0.00041364407,0.000694154,0.005904886,0.011582145,0.014463837,0.0022854828,0.00999811,0.0063208123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050507315,0.00061232725,0.0006656716,0.004733333,0.047217995,0.018559579,0.0050909277,0.0095985625,0.0004671267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007028551,0.0000044177177,0.00029792366,0.00006007526,0.0000034068853,0.00013834667,0.015423381,0.00005431531,0.00008162019,0.9791949,0.0010495568,0.0036849794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033782482,0.00008793526,0.0061896974,0.0030593968,0.000081616636,0.00073516497,0.08894624,0.0005169272,0.0013037215,0.61880815,0.2801183,0.00011908969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0673254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069418564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0673254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017674267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018027691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13386708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261035168","doi":"","title":"Legitimating Penal Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Public law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal procedure; Legitimacy; Subject (documents); Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07332613279523376,"score_gpt":0.4530018182184408,"score_spread":0.37967568542320707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261035168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035384644,0.0034813287,0.035105094,0.07698093,0.0010816446,0.00011347277,0.00019306142,0.00015764279,0.8475022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583245,0.001493554,0.008670125,0.005978177,0.0011562977,0.00012676642,0.00010776887,0.000060663777,0.024082053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989297,0.0042614588,0.00039489742,0.0019168913,0.0029885874,0.001141323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974243,0.015880872,0.0016226729,0.0037733295,0.0037683616,0.0007117859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010744966,0.000433819,0.00056279224,0.0028678975,0.005413815,0.00950388,0.0013028242,0.0061595766,0.009493718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049190912,0.00040399382,0.00038658528,0.0012317414,0.025650429,0.0077357176,0.0055162255,0.007941209,0.0012242746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022986305,0.000004024255,0.00021607771,0.000008433177,0.0000016703991,0.000016315122,0.00021667426,0.000058972448,0.000023612667,0.995436,0.0015108158,0.0025051439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016339047,0.000011786422,0.0010024087,0.00013717555,0.000009918993,0.000062152954,0.0003537318,0.00062347966,0.000264026,0.9210077,0.0764979,0.00001344866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050001936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00769596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010744966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004459336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005541189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05682546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261125889","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i3.12409","title":"THE REVISED CANADIAN TEST FOR THE EXCLUSION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06271134722376055,"score_gpt":0.34468097125984165,"score_spread":0.2819696240360811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261125889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025433118,0.008289008,0.06737862,0.15961982,0.0064418674,0.0011369959,0.006712631,0.00054109964,0.7244469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63124263,0.0059257406,0.16986437,0.09946665,0.002596268,0.0013575187,0.0025584504,0.0002892344,0.08669908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8932401,0.0147470785,0.009057433,0.011470692,0.06328382,0.008200842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89232624,0.029473202,0.0039291135,0.0072802664,0.06299779,0.0039933366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043857843,0.0011534898,0.0021167647,0.009411353,0.012050787,0.012215881,0.0094435755,0.0152798,0.0086697135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13109551,0.0011700289,0.0032537468,0.006224477,0.032648623,0.0073280456,0.0075345435,0.014602737,0.0019869742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119535645,0.000026521977,0.002691382,0.00031008798,0.00009302027,0.0004732193,0.0012257085,0.0005722673,0.0006250088,0.917403,0.05426948,0.022190668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005327494,0.00016546946,0.014592735,0.00202541,0.0006119187,0.001818575,0.0019432293,0.0045065507,0.003418895,0.4540358,0.51537746,0.0009713117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75363547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78848743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24636453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045797233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15478408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4956308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261591876","doi":"","title":"Judicial and Prosecutorial Control of Lying by the Police","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Deception; Political science; Exclusionary rule; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Supreme court; Medicine","score_opus":0.010529202448625685,"score_gpt":0.28608895387092775,"score_spread":0.27555975142230205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261591876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27903342,0.018493934,0.014368751,0.13136752,0.0012597679,0.0001799825,0.00023424206,0.00016016235,0.55490226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816883,0.0019133412,0.0008542767,0.005137986,0.000445296,0.000041176405,0.000028791364,0.000028383462,0.009862455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724361,0.010067486,0.0014557681,0.0026064804,0.008910745,0.004523336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93728954,0.029918076,0.011842659,0.0058933725,0.01233682,0.0027195222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02050323,0.0002790095,0.00054564705,0.0033278326,0.006436898,0.009888746,0.0027849213,0.0041131587,0.004156996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08092862,0.00051745516,0.00040670007,0.0017706916,0.011850134,0.003436438,0.0044163107,0.0077704014,0.0007036515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018153401,0.00016412121,0.030917099,0.00029566817,0.00009326612,0.0021502166,0.06501011,0.0009105736,0.005719728,0.71437854,0.03900647,0.14117269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023942858,0.00031523604,0.2039529,0.0029346012,0.0002912297,0.0025719886,0.04104857,0.004482493,0.00935549,0.2950911,0.43923268,0.00048428628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07270519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09984705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07270519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009343687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013097453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14456397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261915661","doi":"","title":"Statutory Immunity from Charter Damages: Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Charter; Damages; Political science","score_opus":0.027053999608283433,"score_gpt":0.28911640601084104,"score_spread":0.2620624064025576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261915661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18562132,0.0045062345,0.0027943898,0.06964642,0.0009320973,0.00021098522,0.00043699652,0.00022016083,0.73563147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053742,0.0018718785,0.0014984149,0.04775847,0.00020660089,0.0000748902,0.00019930041,0.00004638452,0.14296986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879504,0.0006877107,0.0001883183,0.0008798647,0.0054602926,0.003988794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955996,0.0011729075,0.00015761305,0.00024944532,0.0019430334,0.00087734783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005459409,0.00048154182,0.0005591334,0.0013379196,0.020186767,0.009870083,0.004261036,0.01364983,0.0044303336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007096778,0.00086861313,0.0008907201,0.0013230533,0.009026783,0.0018717606,0.0028220278,0.010975835,0.00052875374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012901725,0.00015208662,0.011809424,0.00009448867,0.00007707712,0.0044080326,0.012756185,0.0022728185,0.0037503862,0.82816637,0.11822557,0.01815845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033698004,0.00026990921,0.06595977,0.00084048684,0.0007330668,0.0018852163,0.021285161,0.0067906627,0.00724873,0.086519256,0.8071219,0.0010088925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97917145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07532572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07532572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14738765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54652894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261919887","doi":"","title":"A Plea to Reject the United States Supreme Court's Due-Process Review of Punitive Damages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Law; Windsor; Political science; Due Process Clause; Mistake; Common law; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.020781998655695192,"score_gpt":0.34253579625397623,"score_spread":0.32175379759828104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261919887","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012828289,0.024461675,0.004437997,0.8566507,0.060806718,0.0000573928,0.00012127956,0.00016489129,0.05201642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05066492,0.012704683,0.005678757,0.7990961,0.04209082,0.00020246523,0.00012283979,0.00025703438,0.08918242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860276,0.004324563,0.0009409556,0.0012588501,0.0062774243,0.0011706033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475,0.034974646,0.0018662823,0.0023765536,0.012005109,0.0012774388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022641247,0.0006890958,0.0014393294,0.0026855003,0.005671029,0.01267669,0.0032570036,0.022577219,0.0053925286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08076322,0.0007509345,0.0019798807,0.002442047,0.009091372,0.010053413,0.0029793284,0.032716375,0.0032786902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016989767,0.000015731288,0.00010098377,0.000098549805,0.000013930996,0.00008229237,0.0005953411,0.00015171723,0.00011149884,0.19168755,0.79174846,0.015376932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024221767,0.000041997155,0.00070653413,0.00056854426,0.000032504176,0.00011451405,0.0005227079,0.00042725512,0.00031188526,0.046934236,0.9502481,0.00006756561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017952947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04008755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022641247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005435881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009483416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11973977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262318772","doi":"","title":"The Fiscal Impact of Changes to Eligibility for Conditional Sentences of Imprisonment in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05192891126289238,"score_gpt":0.4067442219223407,"score_spread":0.3548153106594483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262318772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93450946,0.002322797,0.0001461985,0.036346678,0.00036336214,0.000104542756,0.005348846,0.000046517718,0.020811582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906719,0.0006308628,0.00011309942,0.0020949182,0.0000664905,0.000020944306,0.00088747864,0.000014518659,0.0054999357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237484,0.00063139084,0.0003191727,0.0003142693,0.0016615463,0.0046988223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97914976,0.0021822397,0.0021846865,0.00033506445,0.009476871,0.006671275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029382259,0.00029896206,0.00085993117,0.002328407,0.00538071,0.005062916,0.0034851925,0.002411987,0.007517102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024212932,0.0005781449,0.0012581851,0.003184393,0.0019680134,0.0011703868,0.0028569498,0.0038475953,0.00034512012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004227962,0.001619787,0.73828804,0.00052047416,0.00094488054,0.0014686537,0.004444201,0.01691113,0.0010914836,0.04699732,0.1051293,0.07835672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030070884,0.00026936093,0.9609172,0.00023852677,0.0004097954,0.00015476655,0.00813338,0.0047648526,0.00036458403,0.0017614478,0.02256894,0.00011649172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15295021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15295021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22683316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262521744","doi":"","title":"Unreliable Evidence and Wrongful Convictions: The Case for Excluding Tainted Identification Evidence and Jailhouse and Coerced Confessions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Eyewitness identification; Political science; Hearsay; Confession (law); Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Jury; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.10938419417523636,"score_gpt":0.3736123377119432,"score_spread":0.2642281435367068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262521744","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06558148,0.019692099,0.0126224095,0.7961767,0.0012651315,0.00006494653,0.00010832793,0.000029753353,0.10445929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87735766,0.008472839,0.0041028354,0.099401705,0.0024601184,0.00009895545,0.000047984526,0.000056298115,0.00800156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693187,0.012181689,0.0020206003,0.0020550857,0.009859197,0.0045646937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8333863,0.1310923,0.012787493,0.005484266,0.011557793,0.005691911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04044594,0.0005680613,0.0013317297,0.004058942,0.010959907,0.016866857,0.0046109334,0.02437029,0.0037533003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12562208,0.00089938036,0.0012844299,0.0019059326,0.09189858,0.015289999,0.009991741,0.03178763,0.00041651973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010424291,0.000056619057,0.007340017,0.00014613956,0.000053635347,0.0038184368,0.017368818,0.00031214367,0.0001701228,0.935478,0.01344775,0.021703951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063368665,0.00007422274,0.0068430463,0.001451973,0.00008853867,0.0017089882,0.0105847325,0.00072390033,0.00033818997,0.93256676,0.04538762,0.00016847832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055913426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07776121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055913426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009929816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01476364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2139011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262618429","doi":"","title":"The Charter and Administrative Law: Cross-Fertilization in Public Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Common law; Administrative law; Public law; Jurisprudence; Judicial review","score_opus":0.06334033959590497,"score_gpt":0.35704202823780834,"score_spread":0.2937016886419034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262618429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038361132,0.021468328,0.057433605,0.07092074,0.0008846394,0.00017676142,0.000061425526,0.000166853,0.8105265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449881,0.0063143284,0.014741905,0.0072322534,0.00036807853,0.00013979075,0.000038679875,0.00009733852,0.026079664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97531486,0.010831829,0.00044820807,0.0018398301,0.0077013336,0.0038639081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98335385,0.010189661,0.0006483249,0.0015588396,0.0033614628,0.0008878926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02217186,0.0005352252,0.0009195072,0.008275166,0.020948974,0.033616364,0.0030096679,0.007690532,0.0061204107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02286265,0.0010647908,0.0008955226,0.009294685,0.09966402,0.01837796,0.011855014,0.008943422,0.00038439632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016920857,0.000004795663,0.00009794518,0.00000832003,0.0000013912043,0.000037274523,0.0051488583,0.00011882014,0.000020480518,0.98906004,0.00075427815,0.0047461316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011931178,0.0000220666,0.0021913238,0.00046276985,0.000016558357,0.00009533139,0.016756466,0.001261202,0.0002302166,0.83236885,0.1465172,0.00006610217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60973525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.573196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60973525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09674308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10562793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7851262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263245835","doi":"","title":"Review Essay of Mark Ribeiro, Limiting Arbitrary Power: The Vagueness Doctrine in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Doctrine; Law; Statutory law; Notice; Constitutional law; Political science; Discretion; Premise; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02228272235619991,"score_gpt":0.2938384146666561,"score_spread":0.2715556923104562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263245835","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000879014,0.59114176,0.0011060681,0.30914104,0.024202967,0.000043105836,0.0002853331,0.00002523915,0.073175386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02764263,0.7105583,0.0018253961,0.12228264,0.027198914,0.00007024152,0.00027104173,0.00008476333,0.11006612],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986827,0.00018900042,0.00003622767,0.00013744057,0.0008490801,0.000105561696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972332,0.001035917,0.000088533816,0.00005522559,0.0014444655,0.00014262243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018676949,0.0006622608,0.0007823361,0.003766315,0.0040414236,0.002915621,0.0015897374,0.0024531693,0.0065967925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059252135,0.000317965,0.0004465094,0.0054967636,0.005245789,0.003964399,0.0011118583,0.004041001,0.001930395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074705586,0.000010357254,0.00010699729,0.00022346838,0.0000071253844,0.00004351801,0.0009171216,0.00016363866,0.0000895279,0.03748142,0.93942374,0.021525625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004982386,0.00000404723,0.00078020664,0.0005887554,0.0000074827435,0.000051318864,0.00044627316,0.00005271246,0.000047981786,0.0072906516,0.99070776,0.000017783885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5231365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6474997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4768635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02251196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018435221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9593437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263667907","doi":"","title":"Victim Privacy and the Open Court Principle","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Administration of justice; Openness to experience; Criminal justice; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.0496707106092654,"score_gpt":0.37308633632950483,"score_spread":0.3234156257202394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263667907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044081647,0.014681096,0.08774884,0.23031463,0.0014513743,0.00021812352,0.00020077087,0.00008760514,0.62121594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92030746,0.0051797065,0.009281191,0.035169445,0.001419318,0.00021082422,0.00008060847,0.0000663979,0.028284987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9545389,0.014953179,0.0015106677,0.0034750788,0.019831123,0.005691153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725395,0.01961829,0.0016016909,0.0022833564,0.0028227626,0.0011344657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020462016,0.00037856464,0.0008716405,0.0019971945,0.012654174,0.016507316,0.0024603608,0.009500738,0.0045847124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03424538,0.0005886318,0.0010324342,0.0018048949,0.06432284,0.016865807,0.013229835,0.011207612,0.0005206118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032078751,0.0000042931924,0.00012955563,0.000013239094,0.000002400114,0.000050702212,0.001359023,0.000047159792,0.000026053453,0.9944277,0.0011734401,0.0027631852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014399442,0.000018825762,0.0006598996,0.00023246305,0.000014446745,0.00024961797,0.0027076774,0.0001710972,0.00025541423,0.9173236,0.07832563,0.00002683147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053862754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043574568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053862754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011408547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022833407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108214796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264764557","doi":"","title":"Ignorance of Law, Criminal Culpability and Moral Innocence: Striking A Balance Between Blame and Excuse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Ignorance; Excuse; Culpability; Political science; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Maxim; Civil law (Civil law); Blame; Mistake; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04672827736169968,"score_gpt":0.30913434348503466,"score_spread":0.26240606612333495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264764557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55583584,0.023565905,0.005168784,0.062046766,0.00020960833,0.00003273188,0.00006446553,0.00001206304,0.3530639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479264,0.0018884534,0.00026232746,0.00070632395,0.00006396566,0.000011680538,0.000008841503,0.0000029995042,0.0022628345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982553,0.00093423505,0.00007014765,0.00011742112,0.00033869132,0.00028430807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98629296,0.009457324,0.002775728,0.00027633525,0.0005693798,0.0006282776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028341745,0.00024324236,0.00037594733,0.0015955536,0.0023609633,0.0060102665,0.0007575257,0.003075269,0.004600735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014348773,0.00027363558,0.0002343024,0.0012808456,0.030524261,0.007056792,0.004845913,0.0033275005,0.0002134351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008089646,0.00011083862,0.011904184,0.000117374875,0.000024802344,0.0005250847,0.012098671,0.00053096755,0.000084143234,0.9557841,0.002553947,0.016184965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031053463,0.00014302615,0.047703438,0.0006140222,0.00006676799,0.0011872487,0.027681787,0.0016136105,0.00021908275,0.9032238,0.017464504,0.000051765477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006394207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009526471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006394207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047579627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022533038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03452152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265427457","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1120","title":"Offence Definitions, Conclusive Presumptions, and Slot Machines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Normative; Nothing; Function (biology); Law; Criminal law; Position (finance); Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.047114428625259434,"score_gpt":0.32527035994316905,"score_spread":0.2781559313179096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265427457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04256873,0.00870162,0.28511462,0.04320107,0.0014618277,0.00019591166,0.00081654,0.00030160265,0.6176381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90658516,0.0026124143,0.059647538,0.0038387298,0.00055363355,0.00028081387,0.00040530643,0.00020194768,0.025874468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98421085,0.0064996085,0.0016303681,0.0021141178,0.0042137825,0.0013312307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97448605,0.016642848,0.001851885,0.0034823061,0.0029579438,0.00057895447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011571837,0.000863568,0.0010747489,0.004112014,0.005998834,0.011606444,0.004725917,0.0059668412,0.009021644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03680275,0.0012675371,0.0011955457,0.0035583866,0.040197194,0.02225853,0.0049949726,0.007674505,0.0011934283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023086181,9.974591e-7,0.000030956413,0.00001127648,7.0924426e-7,0.000010552859,0.00035587416,0.0000448138,0.000011615255,0.99811494,0.0004414742,0.0009745244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005602829,0.000005217213,0.00016829997,0.000084248226,0.0000050449344,0.000048474223,0.0005218485,0.0005253532,0.00013714828,0.973976,0.024509272,0.000013574676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022780906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02840806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022780906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011002627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064016343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07983005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265627871","doi":"","title":"Sentencing of Terrorism Offences after 9/11: A Comparative Review of Early Case Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Discretion; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type); Terrorism; Sentence; Common law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.11495337160992988,"score_gpt":0.4155493845721682,"score_spread":0.30059601296223837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265627871","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000872116,0.99745697,0.000045808833,0.00032300683,0.000040590105,0.000007958013,0.000018100654,0.000001219319,0.0012342393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060173385,0.9935033,0.00013853605,0.00013668669,0.00003876163,0.000008240731,0.00002888624,0.000001826039,0.00012635799],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964101,0.0013749709,0.0006047005,0.00036069838,0.001085095,0.00016443241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748492,0.019020516,0.0018007718,0.00034776656,0.0037191748,0.0002624082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060845227,0.0005294159,0.0015524353,0.01072331,0.0008609573,0.002365685,0.0013843167,0.002213957,0.0026051519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026284369,0.0007042063,0.0007861632,0.011298409,0.0017204144,0.0021728086,0.0011120914,0.0017481993,0.0007114564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015436269,0.00014351362,0.0020170214,0.06868428,0.00031923866,0.00048608755,0.0025271266,0.00039852824,0.0004661187,0.014300212,0.015648074,0.8948555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055040447,0.0004998156,0.042731423,0.16721046,0.00091933145,0.0038865276,0.004812237,0.0001919099,0.0008355168,0.003914762,0.77483624,0.00010680783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032804195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052931983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032804195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051022163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011723826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065226495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266333732","doi":"","title":"Social Hosts' Responsibility for Their Intoxicated Guests: Where Courts Fear to Tread","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Duty of care; Supreme court; Law; Duty; Duty to protect; Political science; High Court; Business","score_opus":0.07011957761425468,"score_gpt":0.4149698103921388,"score_spread":0.3448502327778841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266333732","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09162503,0.0069059087,0.0014401736,0.7702005,0.0012740847,0.00002642176,0.00003770645,0.000061210674,0.12842897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79535013,0.0035759807,0.00064981997,0.16975838,0.0008538135,0.000023689381,0.00002184163,0.000040951727,0.029725473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235195,0.00215959,0.0002464757,0.0006633071,0.001768715,0.0028099073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784745,0.0045017293,0.00079604966,0.0005043845,0.0026321062,0.0037182486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006809215,0.00020624325,0.0004260267,0.00086968596,0.017378286,0.0131718265,0.0025010852,0.018806046,0.0061156875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020964887,0.00048311584,0.00042145615,0.0006717459,0.019646551,0.006968872,0.0057485183,0.01795489,0.000683418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052760533,0.00010869706,0.016815726,0.0001390161,0.000035806595,0.008777437,0.061583165,0.00022202861,0.0010368054,0.569699,0.2908905,0.050638974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005502017,0.00012395818,0.023602495,0.0014540849,0.00008431097,0.004357997,0.1804345,0.0007460835,0.0009196995,0.24409613,0.54386336,0.00026238468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28373992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46991634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28373992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01002247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025806434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56417674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266499148","doi":"","title":"Invading the Mind: The Right to Privacy and the Definition of Terrorism in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Terrorism; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legislation; Law; Right to privacy; Order (exchange); Element (criminal law); Information privacy; Ideology; Economic Justice; Politics; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.018403554709919844,"score_gpt":0.275938584849652,"score_spread":0.25753503013973217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266499148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14722154,0.017794102,0.010444882,0.18918413,0.00056228624,0.00013249248,0.000702001,0.000046955036,0.6339116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96694815,0.0046538403,0.0020836955,0.008651793,0.000063720865,0.000029251878,0.00009468827,0.000022541759,0.017452285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932088,0.0012618107,0.00017805237,0.00053021946,0.0030107624,0.0018103188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996335,0.0012189847,0.00032342045,0.00024074415,0.0013132676,0.00056854833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002617772,0.00032581115,0.0004347739,0.0017527612,0.018082263,0.009154095,0.0018678824,0.0034942448,0.0035107092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007559591,0.00029225365,0.00046568204,0.0032173558,0.037209243,0.0041610817,0.0051324693,0.0064798375,0.00014453799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010294382,0.000006627595,0.0019275305,0.000031422587,0.0000045701263,0.0001275312,0.008874266,0.00037134497,0.00005830341,0.9792306,0.0043571168,0.005000432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051622665,0.000028567094,0.027709141,0.0008357343,0.000053182117,0.00040728398,0.0370139,0.002508504,0.0007295166,0.50972134,0.42071855,0.0002227763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99272233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15251265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15251265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15351966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266793662","doi":"","title":"Section 24(1) of the Charter: Strategy and Structure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Charter; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Discretion; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Appeal","score_opus":0.019074150281520014,"score_gpt":0.27043555486646936,"score_spread":0.2513614045849494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266793662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006285857,0.002715244,0.02930288,0.039496537,0.0041731847,0.0032850741,0.0020242732,0.0027016331,0.9100153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057449173,0.0016781045,0.031037722,0.031067973,0.0026723999,0.001907992,0.0010986695,0.00054900174,0.87253886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880455,0.0011438251,0.0005648182,0.0012576685,0.006369598,0.0026185967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99328977,0.0015745693,0.00063957524,0.0006813566,0.0029676144,0.00084721955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007748161,0.0009756074,0.00059696374,0.0019128959,0.0057568066,0.013315528,0.0027931426,0.013271371,0.018748192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015014296,0.0010625856,0.00100625,0.001372325,0.0077475924,0.0030617162,0.0025730834,0.00748691,0.014505467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036555015,0.00006445932,0.00046333493,0.0001110947,0.000003901232,0.00018937535,0.0011075106,0.00079543015,0.0011056943,0.590005,0.36808836,0.038029365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000375768,0.00012311562,0.0025390843,0.0002521915,0.000011422762,0.00015193805,0.0002921842,0.0006389697,0.0010353066,0.041971084,0.9528085,0.0001387259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23633674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22810636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7636633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012102609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05489566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46992218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267406232","doi":"","title":"A Constitutional 'Work in Progress'? The Charter and the Limits of Progressive Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial interpretation; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020609082498623654,"score_gpt":0.3075890471431205,"score_spread":0.2869799646444969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267406232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013360117,0.007518226,0.03508175,0.29756922,0.0019102453,0.00008479394,0.0001637198,0.00013842291,0.6441735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9108957,0.0045200326,0.0176133,0.022871632,0.0019002489,0.00022756896,0.0001430335,0.00021521421,0.04161321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97200274,0.01288204,0.0006961514,0.003262051,0.007773626,0.0033834379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743425,0.015088247,0.0010863973,0.004816863,0.0034952739,0.001170654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029158307,0.0005526809,0.00090941467,0.002270756,0.013503103,0.021049395,0.003926524,0.008920017,0.0068564718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055691916,0.0005789966,0.0007366455,0.0020732908,0.10367664,0.024892766,0.0068993443,0.01659117,0.00086324173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013921355,0.0000014158032,0.000017699338,0.0000040782425,6.8325164e-7,0.000011843019,0.0008709897,0.000034954137,0.000008743061,0.9960055,0.0014504367,0.0015922489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013020533,0.0000050842687,0.00017400923,0.000114965056,0.0000042373636,0.000027183925,0.0014308314,0.00022207947,0.00007564374,0.90741265,0.09050333,0.000017010147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10580503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07580476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89419496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025762198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041781105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21037835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267630323","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years in Charterland: One Westminster Country's Experience with an Entrenched Bill of Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Just policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Bill of rights; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04037486354295924,"score_gpt":0.3606532972281062,"score_spread":0.32027843368514697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267630323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11129846,0.033277716,0.0026536153,0.2526224,0.0044357744,0.00027034525,0.00023285043,0.00012360215,0.5950853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40484113,0.026195541,0.0026123782,0.07254223,0.0005651772,0.00014003104,0.00023995324,0.00026790347,0.49259567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993401,0.0023184866,0.00014799144,0.00042285514,0.001381404,0.0023281812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926771,0.0027801918,0.0002985787,0.0004421617,0.0014527272,0.0023492605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01100392,0.00041298883,0.00050060946,0.0009421293,0.03417232,0.016543647,0.0021515428,0.0051903725,0.010358405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011857506,0.0006763593,0.00044768653,0.0022631558,0.020250715,0.009888409,0.0091004865,0.014063481,0.0010936543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008496579,0.00012320525,0.0028469914,0.00015826659,0.000014513423,0.0024942358,0.26165843,0.0002035731,0.00029238666,0.42862535,0.23228468,0.07121328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397889,0.00003206655,0.0018668682,0.00020654191,0.000007716233,0.00021531696,0.05288212,0.00004570934,0.00014075884,0.005324079,0.939235,0.00003446054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60752726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81223476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39247274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022478689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052610394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7895682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267942469","doi":"","title":"Did September 11 Really Change Everything: Preserving Canadian Values in the Face of Terrorism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Dissent; Criminal law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.05898891311412934,"score_gpt":0.3157298285722342,"score_spread":0.25674091545810485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267942469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14524536,0.006790014,0.00077757146,0.4358594,0.003120078,0.00008211566,0.00018002138,0.000057268153,0.40788808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8414894,0.0046043694,0.0009121396,0.068972476,0.00038048482,0.000028350538,0.00008980855,0.00006623166,0.08345682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473554,0.0005204471,0.000059834776,0.0002668468,0.0013286216,0.003088702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577904,0.00068915356,0.00021363716,0.0001497108,0.0017058805,0.0014625272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025741188,0.00031253955,0.0003368049,0.0008576265,0.043065246,0.015114811,0.001948138,0.005017385,0.004585746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00774107,0.00027681957,0.00041296284,0.0015343714,0.01781001,0.0034420092,0.0037274307,0.006672195,0.0003220559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013111907,0.00006761421,0.008997813,0.00015852568,0.000032736967,0.001759694,0.1669987,0.00051308714,0.0009917124,0.5477175,0.21124472,0.06138671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126028135,0.000032675624,0.007745939,0.00019143803,0.000023769573,0.00017256135,0.12160868,0.00012722905,0.0004829234,0.02041128,0.8490898,0.00010118117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9758197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12063601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12063601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18871161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8752796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268518203","doi":"","title":"New Clouds on the Legality of Unilateral Conduct in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.0515209685268091,"score_gpt":0.3103969746571791,"score_spread":0.25887600613037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268518203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21151274,0.030889578,0.0029259056,0.38491827,0.001271915,0.00015822702,0.0027303733,0.0000970491,0.3654959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274691,0.016089642,0.0016704609,0.022761466,0.0004002381,0.000037363792,0.0005278479,0.000064592954,0.030979278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886406,0.00076182093,0.00044620733,0.0011367971,0.0052543012,0.0035367957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94954157,0.017076049,0.002860293,0.001634448,0.022151673,0.006735954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007130089,0.00028965503,0.0010886877,0.005222127,0.023198524,0.015971722,0.0034025656,0.0050215265,0.016289469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039030097,0.0008349837,0.00067503407,0.0067539243,0.014161365,0.005378276,0.005162698,0.009515324,0.00047904393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027353736,0.000118822616,0.041504193,0.00042468298,0.0001191142,0.0012762701,0.012880435,0.0016874664,0.0005789149,0.6622223,0.17675413,0.10216006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019000641,0.00011144937,0.21171616,0.00296969,0.00040815034,0.0007413418,0.042328134,0.0072217896,0.0016734356,0.1533311,0.5785438,0.0007649711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99717134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99889404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1798983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1798983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3007819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95120174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268700288","doi":"","title":"Compte-rendu de l'ouvrage : « Traité de sécurité intérieure, sous la direction de Maurice Cusson, Benoît Dupont et Frédéric Lemieux, Montréal, Editions Hurtubise HMH, coll. « Cahiers du Québec : Droit et criminologie », 2007 ; Lausanne, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, coll. « Sciences forensiques », 2008 »","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030801460760787575,"score_gpt":0.2739969433715005,"score_spread":0.24319548261071292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268700288","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049271025,0.72732186,0.005529901,0.1531448,0.013118112,0.00009157314,0.0020115809,0.000256581,0.09359848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15377653,0.50931996,0.013005768,0.019610336,0.008094284,0.00029793894,0.002237472,0.00051677856,0.29314095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965939,0.0009962958,0.00018901746,0.00027979282,0.0016696729,0.000271376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491537,0.0015678604,0.00049110106,0.00029375954,0.0022245273,0.0005073373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044001755,0.0010366366,0.0006894939,0.003959945,0.003772518,0.0068176207,0.002716083,0.0030109817,0.015322598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013185773,0.00052333804,0.00045067462,0.0041762507,0.007042236,0.0058983117,0.0019897087,0.0029373849,0.003195135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037878268,0.000023033632,0.0029431737,0.0006475658,0.000021603639,0.00016947379,0.008751282,0.00008528522,0.00026293108,0.05190463,0.7562154,0.17893787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046092655,0.000010896742,0.0081152,0.0010090332,0.000010154944,0.00029524518,0.0026839164,0.000078243516,0.00021428535,0.0044731004,0.9830846,0.00002064847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6457504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72191626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6457504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014546135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029782047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71267164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269205455","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Anti-Terrorism Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Presumption of innocence; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Proportionality (law); Criminal code; Punishment (psychology); Racial profiling; Criminology; Sociology; Race (biology); Psychology","score_opus":0.022527174020868262,"score_gpt":0.26826550703922347,"score_spread":0.2457383330183552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269205455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020495547,0.009588942,0.0015571093,0.12179036,0.0024965361,0.00021833979,0.0031753457,0.0002639907,0.84041387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27447608,0.011418969,0.0045853616,0.07335372,0.00078493217,0.0001620842,0.0018606507,0.00011040529,0.63324785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926052,0.00023154286,0.00012336746,0.0002855363,0.0054965294,0.0012576736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925322,0.0008048543,0.00021419745,0.0002477404,0.00509047,0.0011106078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015416516,0.00044438886,0.0003304818,0.0024593403,0.01209687,0.008917311,0.0017316237,0.0043260907,0.010777559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072623477,0.000546744,0.0006390272,0.002367386,0.003973564,0.0014767036,0.0014731614,0.003754725,0.0010395888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048005757,0.000041708598,0.005323411,0.00019831934,0.000022143031,0.0005252234,0.0022473491,0.00081622583,0.00044356444,0.3850458,0.57194823,0.03334002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019697567,0.000010609617,0.007237936,0.00014126056,0.000023212351,0.000071760645,0.0006164879,0.00032093207,0.00018766725,0.0048865946,0.9864494,0.00003442066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99774027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13205181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13205181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23660524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9581074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269595583","doi":"","title":"Better Late than Never: The Canadian Parliamentary Review of the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Terrorism; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02270312633931941,"score_gpt":0.2815574291146427,"score_spread":0.2588543027753233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269595583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075837667,0.2349859,0.00046293007,0.48685154,0.03320298,0.00028915572,0.003844945,0.00015371831,0.23262498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31482622,0.17426953,0.0020922872,0.19733153,0.01133196,0.00040234192,0.0041813846,0.00055466243,0.29501015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94855183,0.0051395847,0.0015363094,0.0015290347,0.035782233,0.007461065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92465144,0.008609328,0.001692669,0.0014123922,0.05799619,0.0056380406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025639711,0.0009016653,0.0012723476,0.008282675,0.014470615,0.01884678,0.0043904996,0.0070202695,0.008004781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07716622,0.00088158314,0.0007316564,0.0107813785,0.007544349,0.0031499385,0.0025534627,0.0077944705,0.0017195902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047034682,0.000016357417,0.0011335608,0.00045029318,0.000030989602,0.000081317325,0.0015347684,0.00027031818,0.000085199514,0.0436703,0.9221179,0.030561956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014473499,0.0000057818484,0.007463134,0.00058943115,0.000022225853,0.000015876545,0.0011486578,0.00011804767,0.000058182697,0.0012540813,0.98926264,0.000047378315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99045545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20952626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20952626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48532996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9168375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269709512","doi":"","title":"The Application of Section 24(2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a Civil Action","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scrutiny; Political science; Realm; Law; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018814127902786772,"score_gpt":0.2903531990119211,"score_spread":0.27153907110913433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269709512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03240626,0.012402019,0.04709965,0.09064068,0.013339143,0.0010627211,0.0012908566,0.00062144594,0.80113715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5445178,0.01024238,0.074388266,0.1664037,0.008189625,0.0018565033,0.0009832387,0.00026634362,0.19315217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784736,0.0045222756,0.0023487776,0.0025491824,0.009040054,0.0030661686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98329425,0.00936318,0.002111236,0.0017897265,0.0027426302,0.0006989453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019367283,0.00063414057,0.0009455276,0.0013578384,0.005125693,0.010363896,0.002555538,0.0145951025,0.0048996317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032682043,0.00080396334,0.0016251265,0.0011957063,0.016005106,0.003962272,0.0038741855,0.012348161,0.0030579127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027028138,0.000044462107,0.00083903765,0.00011026864,0.00001000959,0.00040689766,0.0019519654,0.0002634367,0.0011070381,0.9367345,0.04230052,0.016204894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006673204,0.00038614165,0.009556961,0.0011992243,0.00007123889,0.0012102128,0.0013932089,0.0005576163,0.0029864435,0.26082206,0.7214658,0.0002843846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034540184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04506104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042338744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02214215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10242516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269810752","doi":"","title":"Admissibility of Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Reports","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Presumption; Commission; Law; Political science; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.020713446846291984,"score_gpt":0.3217402286989018,"score_spread":0.3010267818526098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269810752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23126958,0.0027957524,0.0123136,0.046393737,0.0016190897,0.0023117047,0.015560162,0.0005041887,0.6872322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8442216,0.0014473475,0.010363247,0.006787645,0.00076845323,0.0005777184,0.004568088,0.00009956822,0.13116631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8965214,0.0096691465,0.010226523,0.0069749467,0.06972908,0.0068788906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7531898,0.058360673,0.036837123,0.03929166,0.10617799,0.0061427606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035067786,0.00040866266,0.00061654305,0.008241373,0.008610157,0.008892936,0.0039622267,0.00438019,0.009480106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26026848,0.0014234722,0.0008030028,0.0057243356,0.0047552064,0.0028216317,0.003271264,0.0032222758,0.0018086977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081819465,0.00026756804,0.25957075,0.0014693125,0.0005014395,0.005133472,0.041048422,0.0020345615,0.0038089394,0.42007527,0.13930632,0.12596583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025857083,0.00036019168,0.24911971,0.0025457456,0.00062933494,0.0023516999,0.010256905,0.005146031,0.012944144,0.04247675,0.67343235,0.0004785532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7115902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7276665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28840983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025372531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05935145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58021665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272155419","doi":"10.59962/9780774817349-011","title":"Contextualizing Criminal Defences: Exploring the Contribution of Justice Bertha Wilson","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07025515391255831,"score_gpt":0.24975401010808987,"score_spread":0.17949885619553158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272155419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38874698,0.05081234,0.0054352973,0.14745444,0.0010937259,0.00014003817,0.0001227446,0.000043603126,0.40615082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97407305,0.008902622,0.0014828317,0.008465507,0.00021233465,0.000070884846,0.000038211616,0.00003343085,0.006721013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897071,0.007392482,0.00018737362,0.0005718621,0.0010659548,0.0010751884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892669,0.008582661,0.00071600557,0.00026785402,0.000641149,0.00052552763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062274598,0.0006232885,0.000736696,0.0043707388,0.024181379,0.016615298,0.0021665,0.0062747793,0.002828617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015605205,0.0006157623,0.00038593737,0.0044194423,0.03186164,0.012015442,0.011936508,0.007602735,0.00026894064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003876458,0.000053429405,0.0025652146,0.0002358113,0.00001610327,0.0012797378,0.5763307,0.00023107127,0.00028781456,0.38492557,0.009257552,0.024778146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001540344,0.000041533247,0.0050907205,0.0014892725,0.000029912078,0.00033350263,0.67092764,0.00024030641,0.00023443009,0.12227501,0.19926554,0.00005678925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085346386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20542945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9146536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014401714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009780813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16969925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272184850","doi":"","title":"Developments in Criminal Procedure: The 1993-1994 Term","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Interpretation (philosophy); Criminal justice; Computer science","score_opus":0.03200722309273895,"score_gpt":0.30797954426807106,"score_spread":0.2759723211753321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272184850","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0195642,0.49894473,0.0036171535,0.067404136,0.00657069,0.00018438757,0.00026429057,0.00006851186,0.403382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3659462,0.38258502,0.009330612,0.0988739,0.011769452,0.0011818515,0.0006425639,0.00016017318,0.12951022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99061894,0.00177751,0.0008984912,0.0010539618,0.004550979,0.0011001062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927019,0.0034227637,0.0014085905,0.00021701383,0.0018428573,0.00040687688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070520397,0.0005277236,0.0005314114,0.0030335432,0.0051904763,0.010730687,0.0016563083,0.008758763,0.0020860834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012932117,0.0005418331,0.00063888816,0.0038925607,0.010911052,0.0046604555,0.003800587,0.009276537,0.00073235226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000358652,0.000039037637,0.00073769555,0.00035962762,0.000007318423,0.0004053649,0.002923037,0.000242048,0.00034257607,0.865652,0.047467273,0.0817881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013760631,0.0001328802,0.005854845,0.0014605669,0.000023247358,0.00095136976,0.0011329295,0.00015358263,0.00040410258,0.033774838,0.9560504,0.000047461162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07368551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073229335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07368551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023734719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020321008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17220825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272898030","doi":"","title":"The Possession Paradigm: The Special Part and the Police Model of the Criminal Process","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Mens rea; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Strict liability; Voluntariness; Political science; Psychology; Liability","score_opus":0.021813775778286568,"score_gpt":0.3125966711749324,"score_spread":0.2907828953966458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272898030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039770328,0.004284128,0.13519424,0.05248785,0.0010541618,0.00021126488,0.00024815294,0.00013084475,0.76661897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90827805,0.0046234606,0.024215715,0.00557732,0.0023166642,0.00037594902,0.00018605929,0.00015379219,0.054273047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947029,0.0020324558,0.00018870074,0.00066242873,0.0017630652,0.0006505986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964715,0.0011552041,0.00057261845,0.0005988552,0.00073067285,0.00047121334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031657605,0.0005975825,0.00054219656,0.003087591,0.0049760235,0.008663834,0.0017844391,0.003941305,0.008880433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005523971,0.0005159579,0.0010416886,0.0016054866,0.024861973,0.016520793,0.005611779,0.0067252438,0.0013999596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029586586,0.0000060428165,0.0001249179,0.0000075756393,8.8793956e-7,0.000035192,0.00053919316,0.000059421425,0.00001616978,0.996765,0.00080544193,0.0016372247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013270839,0.000026325877,0.0005299067,0.00007406978,0.0000052348687,0.00024328203,0.00090204884,0.001929472,0.000087696615,0.9537982,0.04237723,0.000013228535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005722715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004179391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008880433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004014659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054700477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029708028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273105983","doi":"","title":"Using Protection of Privacy Legislation to Erode Privacy: R. v. Chehil","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Warrant; Enforcement; Personally identifiable information; Law; Expectation of privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Business; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Law enforcement; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06529860378899911,"score_gpt":0.33736560571801083,"score_spread":0.27206700192901173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273105983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08990845,0.0045527075,0.0040194364,0.2384336,0.0023448921,0.00032077217,0.00043028413,0.00038316767,0.65960675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51246583,0.0014428461,0.0021394598,0.34859845,0.000685716,0.00036393903,0.00014021549,0.0000866544,0.13407688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888804,0.002058964,0.0003319889,0.0011779125,0.002799306,0.004751553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919314,0.004875312,0.000415339,0.0005451149,0.0014863177,0.0007464905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067482837,0.0005864212,0.0006627953,0.0010469411,0.012359651,0.009706336,0.0030573313,0.026403924,0.005303092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0134547865,0.0009102811,0.0011347564,0.0006393992,0.007814643,0.0032809712,0.003755296,0.01993783,0.0022203214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019274846,0.00009060091,0.003923547,0.0001370259,0.000050318617,0.0035463755,0.0051886705,0.0004588701,0.0020782133,0.71674234,0.2529634,0.014627952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063052453,0.00056811963,0.024497164,0.001495628,0.00047441723,0.0031323873,0.008605244,0.0034112923,0.007813285,0.102841526,0.84591776,0.0006126101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30569124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44833365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30569124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013306886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020322055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60782385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273359719","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights as an Effective Manner and Form Device: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in \"Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General)\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012501353211383789,"score_gpt":0.2754712596877646,"score_spread":0.2629699064763808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273359719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044349458,0.003652818,0.0048487047,0.056360863,0.00040989698,0.00034038594,0.001200498,0.000060962186,0.88877636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81904036,0.0035292003,0.0055503137,0.018816676,0.00030264692,0.000276149,0.00034408574,0.00012923707,0.15201142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838874,0.0011957623,0.00024726856,0.0009292343,0.009013984,0.0047264593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418795,0.0013872747,0.000182819,0.00030358208,0.003330393,0.0006078829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004579517,0.0008298114,0.0010588116,0.004165928,0.02154346,0.01536884,0.004251808,0.009672504,0.01092566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015292719,0.0009036357,0.0014860309,0.0053484133,0.018144958,0.003691627,0.0030615984,0.010532569,0.0008023538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085443735,0.0000057336374,0.00023725945,0.000013010214,0.0000048097413,0.000044284257,0.00063471944,0.00016672618,0.000048284393,0.98603755,0.010666834,0.0021320852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021586889,0.000050910698,0.015234783,0.0005399016,0.0003570196,0.00017602078,0.006717233,0.0044715474,0.0012072008,0.4580678,0.51267695,0.00028481436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98938507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99384224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14991418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14991418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20191732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273430324","doi":"10.14288/1.0093677","title":"The administration of justice in the three higher criminal courts of Vancouver","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04310937119689483,"score_gpt":0.242744570441843,"score_spread":0.19963519924494816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273430324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95753306,0.00078975566,0.00016899372,0.0022008456,0.000027560698,0.000081876984,0.00009408393,0.000014139594,0.039089654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98351073,0.0006410735,0.00031369855,0.00051231176,0.0000062972736,0.000027797969,0.00007024852,0.0000095122905,0.0149082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974832,0.00040373145,0.00009241042,0.00017255962,0.00069375924,0.001154415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948377,0.0008741055,0.00059699354,0.000099503675,0.0016333673,0.0019582983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006756915,0.00020661093,0.0003457939,0.0021149283,0.022147503,0.006366873,0.0016449161,0.001822927,0.0037015968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046897307,0.0004754367,0.00018024356,0.0038315647,0.005751326,0.00065421755,0.0033986564,0.002456642,0.00031403772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025742347,0.0003338511,0.34438217,0.00050576235,0.00008252352,0.013715177,0.36698365,0.0021944982,0.0067356955,0.09451312,0.02086519,0.14943089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035278095,0.00008293275,0.5192077,0.00040528917,0.00003701166,0.0013179155,0.39017218,0.0009576087,0.0010738228,0.004290847,0.08227343,0.00014597326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97576433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068598084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068598084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06375204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49771625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274591495","doi":"","title":"R. v. O'Brien: Can the End Justify the Means?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04716949040171145,"score_gpt":0.29563438709719725,"score_spread":0.2484648966954858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274591495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071862666,0.012977635,0.0036752387,0.7074946,0.006478891,0.000042044736,0.00009156873,0.00013185205,0.26192194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16369268,0.004568541,0.0032324702,0.7469164,0.0033864207,0.000111046895,0.000051764473,0.00016535448,0.07787531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99278355,0.0017201601,0.0003359049,0.0008124663,0.002586466,0.0017614381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98790294,0.008525579,0.0005639047,0.00063813885,0.0015614831,0.00080792606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008535929,0.0005308267,0.0009288666,0.0010147372,0.007038399,0.007550528,0.0021819929,0.028376825,0.005951182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050093267,0.00055980694,0.00084481423,0.0006299792,0.011547771,0.0072499034,0.0029896635,0.028641373,0.003074088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007112572,0.000021866112,0.0008293929,0.000094518684,0.000019781155,0.00042298532,0.0017142985,0.00012630399,0.0003972333,0.63004,0.34821066,0.018051887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007678548,0.0000848765,0.0019909204,0.00092471245,0.00007024681,0.00041352422,0.0019997908,0.00049763755,0.0011323084,0.3293732,0.66331375,0.00012221235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037448913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08441459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037448913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003375932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009331257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07446188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276111950","doi":"","title":"Hired Guns and Smoking Guns: McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia Ltd","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Supreme court; Adversarial system; Political science; Law; Tobacco industry; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.034751498818561835,"score_gpt":0.3078857873069314,"score_spread":0.27313428848836957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276111950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47541034,0.00994061,0.0007213566,0.22497468,0.0013563057,0.00016397047,0.00012563435,0.000043945118,0.28726313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8241646,0.0027325524,0.00041564132,0.098319456,0.00024534078,0.0000648395,0.000032835564,0.000018547687,0.07400611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969983,0.00060654397,0.00011079769,0.00025292236,0.001073518,0.00095800625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980111,0.0009219294,0.00016336258,0.00006393193,0.00025861312,0.00058099406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002506293,0.0002898169,0.0003158537,0.00057269173,0.011183039,0.0031760174,0.0013849891,0.014480099,0.0046485267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008956161,0.00055050483,0.00030448844,0.00071982655,0.0030270736,0.0016469925,0.0030262247,0.011392345,0.00060659205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054799794,0.0005281599,0.047087446,0.0007397545,0.0001809247,0.050111763,0.112912536,0.00076197716,0.0074114283,0.4205114,0.26244888,0.096757725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017581985,0.0006855481,0.13268006,0.001618223,0.00041106393,0.015009424,0.075180195,0.001871049,0.0041455515,0.05107768,0.71670914,0.0004362432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42021358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69092095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42021358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057408246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014927588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83553535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227614572","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Consumer protection; Product (mathematics); Law; Business; Legislation; Commission; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Liability; Commerce; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09851926336921897,"score_gpt":0.3031498479018137,"score_spread":0.20463058453259475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227614572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016842047,0.015181662,0.0004493755,0.82986873,0.014267565,0.000035732253,0.00055636925,0.0001916423,0.13776466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041724175,0.015751803,0.0014864809,0.69525015,0.005151761,0.000044215965,0.0006472188,0.00021680439,0.23972742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867784,0.000816386,0.0002867842,0.0009924545,0.008132482,0.0029934766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829454,0.0023797927,0.0005947817,0.000843635,0.010233155,0.0030033335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059078587,0.0007467898,0.00090193,0.0017616869,0.01486469,0.01544788,0.0030071752,0.018188294,0.02820802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01783897,0.0007539615,0.0009645572,0.0031713515,0.010856807,0.0070678,0.0027199879,0.013471514,0.006141726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186298,0.000013955576,0.00028709482,0.00007689803,0.000006720679,0.00009989464,0.0004990192,0.000025329397,0.00009512371,0.047618523,0.93872786,0.012537749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075546263,0.0000046752148,0.00068718515,0.00011708822,0.000008648859,0.000035850266,0.0004649847,0.00003232272,0.00004789913,0.0018416785,0.9967303,0.000021992022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9521329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97788095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07399209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07399209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19373937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5368527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277189023","doi":"","title":"Dans l'affaire Charkaoui c. Canada, la Cour suprême du Canada invalide une procédure permettant à l'exécutif de détenir indéfiniment et sans procés des suspects de terrorisme","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit penal et de criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05384868106455565,"score_gpt":0.3273620263150581,"score_spread":0.27351334525050247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277189023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08426429,0.041138068,0.019336166,0.5791282,0.02594158,0.00047200726,0.0020589356,0.0006869342,0.24697378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42477298,0.01234279,0.015994096,0.1671423,0.0025267932,0.0002378323,0.00028172613,0.00035127316,0.37635025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955575,0.0005466927,0.00020757745,0.0005678282,0.0019297735,0.0011906957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957451,0.0022044035,0.00015902886,0.00011993921,0.0013619822,0.0004094559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036582244,0.0006525142,0.00070377695,0.0011634113,0.018984819,0.0067555816,0.0016737961,0.012755452,0.0058233268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013513944,0.0007257568,0.0009170308,0.0013826513,0.0061734547,0.0018588259,0.0011859275,0.015257833,0.0007970147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018433471,0.00006327322,0.006135307,0.00024116893,0.000108471184,0.0027810987,0.011490304,0.0009999112,0.0017645753,0.52187,0.41158158,0.04277993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044219316,0.000034858673,0.008381499,0.00020790774,0.0000658312,0.0005188835,0.0045221415,0.00064718636,0.002945522,0.014748007,0.96774006,0.00014389581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93316984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06683016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02997813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07133131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21750754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277522755","doi":"","title":"More Criminalisation in Canada: More of the Same?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.044999098703249266,"score_gpt":0.318343759731686,"score_spread":0.27334466102843674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277522755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110174716,0.036457635,0.0005690605,0.81163585,0.0030119752,0.00006407348,0.003450638,0.00007336084,0.034562714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77108,0.026094945,0.0012540265,0.1832368,0.0030150155,0.00004659713,0.001887642,0.00015650483,0.013228534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98197937,0.002531628,0.00092537724,0.0018091693,0.0055516735,0.007202884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93378544,0.008535342,0.007252291,0.0020692477,0.030434396,0.017923232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00961751,0.00063570664,0.0017884873,0.0045066555,0.009884885,0.012548123,0.0037226034,0.007749495,0.023680616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05210133,0.0005793776,0.0015114357,0.00883413,0.009568012,0.00958466,0.0044021434,0.0121071935,0.0007422896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006034538,0.00035688866,0.2545041,0.0016400485,0.0010796619,0.001083129,0.0123962015,0.0013761114,0.00051857956,0.1295119,0.4120761,0.1848538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022147919,0.00014455974,0.6209984,0.005378004,0.0010747272,0.00068635365,0.03854414,0.0016127237,0.00055121724,0.04493767,0.28517455,0.00067623553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09891819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09891819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21081826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7177051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278476361","doi":"","title":"Criminal Appeals as Jury Control: An Anglo-Canadian Historical Perspective on the Rise of Criminal Appeals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jury; Criminal justice; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal law; Context (archaeology); Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.025775780889411196,"score_gpt":0.31611340107566815,"score_spread":0.290337620186257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278476361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07207622,0.06694893,0.0052508377,0.11720158,0.0011362775,0.00007743268,0.0003824438,0.00007079331,0.73685545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190303,0.025692256,0.0015403281,0.0056332303,0.00062026636,0.000023130373,0.00006860097,0.00007839964,0.04731333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942597,0.0010546682,0.00014018633,0.0006192541,0.002149981,0.0017762692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940187,0.0018020484,0.00040750558,0.0001936666,0.0028930872,0.0006850615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041217715,0.00035868926,0.00040035567,0.004303822,0.016036963,0.010972589,0.0017966965,0.0033475696,0.00470644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010911355,0.00047155112,0.00027237317,0.0050173234,0.04238887,0.0039270944,0.0024047373,0.0044549773,0.0003377298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014800208,0.000009692726,0.0009105717,0.000049065828,0.0000042875895,0.00012325986,0.018845761,0.0002534786,0.00007250795,0.96378887,0.006079159,0.009848511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020380607,0.00002717926,0.019701032,0.00065394543,0.000043052114,0.00024845716,0.016418982,0.0011565335,0.00034428047,0.15087971,0.8103543,0.00015200373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98372805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17245758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07994218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9598319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278549597","doi":"","title":"Property on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context ed. Eric Tucker, James Muir, Bruce Ziff (review)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.039407165941338015,"score_gpt":0.29291311381129825,"score_spread":0.2535059478699602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278549597","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013389906,0.9720967,0.000047493497,0.022003254,0.0027061757,0.000014898457,0.00009168932,0.000005788177,0.0029001217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031288494,0.9829522,0.00009827251,0.011001199,0.0013839655,0.00002252347,0.000100784855,0.000008220655,0.0013041702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491334,0.0008349108,0.00045728264,0.0003946744,0.0028786846,0.0005210383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833946,0.0070122234,0.0015431284,0.0002492689,0.0065248753,0.0012759239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061986833,0.0014013641,0.002649451,0.0074030138,0.004827779,0.0065874313,0.0038453045,0.0072071943,0.0078265155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03599161,0.0007275247,0.0012474896,0.013557193,0.00587608,0.0035909743,0.0022463803,0.0061213914,0.0014533452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005920491,0.000017559018,0.0006591078,0.007730391,0.0001222185,0.0004317288,0.0004811343,0.00012312844,0.000042212938,0.008357751,0.81994027,0.16203532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006993137,0.00002316922,0.006507674,0.06088745,0.00038507802,0.0012198789,0.0013940465,0.00007120571,0.00008966017,0.0040889108,0.9251795,0.00008346438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7699274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8865326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23007262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035683095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12843858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4628551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279900049","doi":"","title":"Développements récents relatifs au droit à la protection contre les fouilles, les perquisitions ou les saisies abusives dans les écoles et autres lieux publics (Recent Developments Regarding the Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures in Schools and Other Public Places)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Political science; Art; Ethnology; History","score_opus":0.07416733354734356,"score_gpt":0.30238135371022873,"score_spread":0.22821402016288517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279900049","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023832632,0.743573,0.0026730536,0.057284135,0.0018732601,0.000074411975,0.0015628734,0.000050870443,0.1690758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108851045,0.85237163,0.0054585887,0.0077770455,0.0014588798,0.000058265156,0.0012497867,0.000049024515,0.022725722],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962792,0.0009310102,0.0003183511,0.00056633324,0.0014293151,0.0004757786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611008,0.020185918,0.00448647,0.0012063857,0.011648676,0.0013718448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008027642,0.00055584806,0.00045736908,0.008262321,0.0019085148,0.0083211595,0.001644567,0.003328359,0.013269629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02506551,0.00061452144,0.0006348478,0.013284678,0.004842146,0.005942241,0.0017261707,0.0027488335,0.0016028074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016410237,0.00025598946,0.011573941,0.0072937896,0.00009059776,0.000979395,0.00910978,0.0010603872,0.0012061726,0.13320264,0.061782666,0.77328056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009048874,0.00016582817,0.025001649,0.004474499,0.00011100671,0.00081519864,0.004941632,0.00023220267,0.0016205453,0.00706225,0.95551527,0.000050940977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17896883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34555674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17896883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011276649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019632524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35585427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280062980","doi":"10.7202/1027799ar","title":"Notions juridiques applicables aux procédures de règlement amiable des litiges au Canada. Joëlle Thibault, Les procédures de règlement amiable des litiges au Canada, Collection bleue, Montréal, Wilson et Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 428 pages, ISBN 2-89127-490-3","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02743201783232916,"score_gpt":0.2709401230011389,"score_spread":0.24350810516880975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280062980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035686162,0.3936932,0.02388422,0.050890718,0.0040919497,0.00017771755,0.0015821797,0.00021623512,0.5218951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1609861,0.40358496,0.021510594,0.016692488,0.005803337,0.0005184315,0.0017012336,0.0005109935,0.38869184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855099,0.002792224,0.00061728846,0.0012560426,0.008475426,0.0013492557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941625,0.0023086646,0.0004343138,0.00028913305,0.0024235172,0.0003818322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007072285,0.001302171,0.0009977977,0.0065804203,0.010976047,0.013638446,0.0030601523,0.005232062,0.035108272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012329792,0.0014746668,0.0011183678,0.009805015,0.022624297,0.008394897,0.0041092853,0.010289815,0.006390955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024251034,0.000017068494,0.0003789114,0.00039135042,0.000018202376,0.00010418833,0.0045416458,0.00028372876,0.00017966128,0.7907477,0.16597277,0.037340537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015200401,0.000011865652,0.003253121,0.00086785055,0.000026222842,0.0002761038,0.0022102527,0.00014672309,0.00023898574,0.09925976,0.8936236,0.000070323214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7247115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7490949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27528852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04928423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055260863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5538195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280485996","doi":"","title":"Le rôle des valeurs et du contexte dans la transformation de la fonction de juger","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007647450277384231,"score_gpt":0.20923222242810158,"score_spread":0.20158477215071735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280485996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12289435,0.010795218,0.018606966,0.064545065,0.0007418648,0.000101563724,0.00019673909,0.00014025834,0.7819781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258561,0.0033412797,0.0031635098,0.0019278917,0.00017185717,0.00008389832,0.000056618243,0.00014982931,0.06524898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98867655,0.006131064,0.00022545418,0.0014561673,0.0019798472,0.0015309686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99240935,0.0030548435,0.0006374638,0.0007102707,0.0017997057,0.0013884526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008823385,0.0005535263,0.0005770142,0.0019615204,0.013681433,0.019974938,0.0014671925,0.0024776468,0.013171864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011373209,0.0005198598,0.00047869704,0.0026344124,0.03784934,0.008902048,0.0077035124,0.0046348763,0.0012565377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025215691,0.00002152339,0.0018041003,0.00008848083,0.000012470891,0.00020669006,0.049585164,0.00020753189,0.0003996804,0.93264765,0.0026955272,0.012305987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035240508,0.00006537618,0.010313751,0.00068231026,0.000039369603,0.00027410715,0.09163002,0.00045604497,0.0007877407,0.21810621,0.6775306,0.00007922251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1621586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25506112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1621586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030454932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04655625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32242948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280581562","doi":"","title":"Good Faith, Bad Faith and the Gulf between: A Proposal for Consistent Terminology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Faith; Terminology; Phrase; Confusion; Bad faith; Jurisprudence; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.048996816244247884,"score_gpt":0.29784516596780924,"score_spread":0.24884834972356135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280581562","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030056035,0.027025517,0.3130736,0.34630963,0.0080295205,0.0005677223,0.0003261648,0.00029147413,0.27432045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77875865,0.00765646,0.15328985,0.041893188,0.0058540585,0.0024240818,0.00027778785,0.00032991898,0.009516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9449609,0.03670843,0.0040930635,0.0038121522,0.007819154,0.0026062515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551138,0.029608889,0.0036529177,0.004113396,0.0052979044,0.002213064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05402006,0.0013247335,0.003021182,0.009988379,0.0145286415,0.029482035,0.009089121,0.017668001,0.0032020633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06009562,0.0016124739,0.0021174266,0.0075806016,0.11557702,0.037431717,0.01597092,0.023451123,0.0011934179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042497695,0.000003459123,0.000035671903,0.000015032925,0.0000012325957,0.00001312162,0.0013711127,0.000019858666,0.000013341456,0.99703836,0.00061219966,0.00087246567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018228326,0.000017112008,0.000092996335,0.00018532525,0.0000066521875,0.00005125631,0.0024458827,0.0002578238,0.000037541035,0.97713965,0.019728517,0.000019071229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029552672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023080364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05402006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009251076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01359808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28568882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281632046","doi":"10.5623/cig2013-006","title":"<i>Black v. Norris</i>: A New Synopsis of Survey Law","year":2013,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0638483562228107,"score_gpt":0.30286507742339536,"score_spread":0.23901672120058465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281632046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018338764,0.048599422,0.016341172,0.8223561,0.022116086,0.000115526906,0.0013741008,0.00025173067,0.0870119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04829203,0.030374674,0.013486163,0.84017473,0.025780316,0.0004146961,0.00060378626,0.00025201475,0.040621653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868531,0.0050559696,0.0013033001,0.0011178217,0.0047666375,0.00090308173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585992,0.031539448,0.0016487199,0.0015392798,0.0057968623,0.0008764093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016449403,0.0008369161,0.0011126461,0.00505512,0.00487511,0.009325009,0.004182641,0.014814115,0.0036894719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05213348,0.00087954215,0.0012494421,0.007212085,0.011830634,0.012270247,0.003720003,0.01271954,0.0014680478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010849497,0.000009503655,0.00068785244,0.00016583703,0.000010747463,0.0000876,0.00087240466,0.0000671027,0.0000817226,0.28898937,0.69729084,0.011726174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009635899,0.000015936486,0.002439664,0.0008338945,0.000022430857,0.00021556113,0.0008757435,0.0002829315,0.00031298937,0.07103476,0.9238963,0.00006018917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045329846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11906395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045329846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073885364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012803115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281825073","doi":"","title":"Summary Judgment Has its Day in Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summary judgment; Appeal; Mandate; Law; Credibility; Political science; Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.05574907517458608,"score_gpt":0.3138775116869349,"score_spread":0.25812843651234885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281825073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055117547,0.004488937,0.023168238,0.09112925,0.027498655,0.00025078098,0.0009429384,0.0011232671,0.8458861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16604394,0.0034632585,0.016855337,0.07901503,0.010948998,0.0002529786,0.0012312649,0.0010539872,0.72113526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791774,0.0023018348,0.0018064337,0.0028487314,0.011647757,0.0022178157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97500706,0.006691277,0.0006556761,0.0042564017,0.011367802,0.0020218338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012069211,0.0006297712,0.00096076477,0.0015720131,0.013813983,0.02022612,0.0024491746,0.011191679,0.03350968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0445034,0.0011186289,0.0012937007,0.0015293056,0.011470884,0.0064990735,0.0053302683,0.014416361,0.015574052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046210127,0.000019219613,0.00062671816,0.000091727765,0.000014972517,0.00031153948,0.0018429214,0.00011823601,0.000452144,0.49777588,0.4491484,0.049551953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146125785,0.000026573785,0.00057757506,0.00010216018,0.000012546164,0.00010655924,0.00032836362,0.00012575506,0.0002351833,0.021635424,0.9767914,0.000043885906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11075451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16703562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11075451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014142285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021344082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22021973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281954044","doi":"10.11575/prism/33978","title":"Whatever Happened To ... Feeney?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0427106296052758,"score_gpt":0.24499373465293375,"score_spread":0.20228310504765795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281954044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036407705,0.013699258,0.00074976805,0.85571074,0.0076199407,0.000034410547,0.0002714944,0.000060678154,0.08544597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5739795,0.016928384,0.0013442825,0.31312808,0.0032885086,0.0000427718,0.0001762856,0.00010408143,0.09100808],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968977,0.0007027699,0.00011492881,0.0005693522,0.00084080634,0.0008745212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962094,0.0012709979,0.0005962657,0.00014843841,0.0007337265,0.0010412516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019553085,0.00033072734,0.0003166539,0.000932485,0.015272332,0.0052479547,0.0010642072,0.0068954155,0.01397384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023307174,0.00024505993,0.00040112832,0.0014476604,0.00825595,0.005928528,0.0022738012,0.010492299,0.0013395515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013268592,0.00005565513,0.014117651,0.00034992542,0.000042761403,0.012640755,0.031122657,0.00015790164,0.00032134395,0.21580976,0.6142593,0.11098969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016604692,0.000045455068,0.009099119,0.0009433513,0.00004594279,0.010801042,0.046823528,0.00013114308,0.00074716343,0.034721587,0.8964864,0.00013864806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28671095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33512366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28671095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012080014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011495133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5700842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284973347","doi":"","title":"Exclusion of Evidence Obtained in Violation of Fundamental Rights in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.03354760912979791,"score_gpt":0.31418138694565834,"score_spread":0.2806337778158604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284973347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81024253,0.0058205635,0.0011733363,0.032635275,0.00024281496,0.0004940215,0.0006652413,0.000036793725,0.1486894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710037,0.004313761,0.0027384416,0.005396319,0.000043945187,0.00008622664,0.00022104205,0.000029726603,0.016166817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827443,0.0010836326,0.0014749916,0.0015059166,0.0069236704,0.0062675127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713606,0.007059725,0.0029254602,0.001216564,0.012351801,0.0050859204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096447915,0.00039579358,0.0008631122,0.004031735,0.018410258,0.009595318,0.0026673996,0.003753924,0.0024125848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037486304,0.0009623391,0.001072671,0.004493181,0.010646417,0.002283406,0.0052955463,0.006818825,0.00018507303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015268251,0.000356452,0.27573603,0.0012844888,0.00075226574,0.021921763,0.17749964,0.0040377956,0.0131002115,0.2958073,0.044137184,0.16384007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035303883,0.0003808562,0.6059443,0.0021390314,0.0010082151,0.0039002856,0.09766346,0.0029284589,0.0053379238,0.010616917,0.26837978,0.001347842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99620396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99886984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115722805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115722805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19627452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8396317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285113285","doi":"","title":"Les poursuites-bâillons : frontière entre liberté d’expression et droit à la réputation","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Publics; Ethnology; Art; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.008528379982824803,"score_gpt":0.21800276467907126,"score_spread":0.20947438469624646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285113285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26883146,0.0072789053,0.0073979963,0.13962425,0.0011319484,0.00007167335,0.00009495392,0.00016678605,0.57540214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8883559,0.0010849494,0.00058641797,0.006426672,0.00009806278,0.000025804864,0.000013463324,0.000058600814,0.10335008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940989,0.0032227125,0.00007622717,0.0005017424,0.0010390228,0.00106138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951389,0.0017298261,0.0005434083,0.00042039106,0.0012277879,0.0009395919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047088014,0.0003117206,0.0003315197,0.0008672593,0.026615398,0.013298061,0.0012863753,0.0034420255,0.0072501157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066267904,0.0003322978,0.00026801662,0.0008685544,0.03653568,0.0056950045,0.004577678,0.0060489294,0.0009599439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045559613,0.00002829295,0.0038258065,0.00007378549,0.000009026177,0.0007632394,0.3767763,0.000094506024,0.00072416797,0.5442502,0.04817134,0.02523775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012617074,0.000052659907,0.011399414,0.00040009752,0.000014276662,0.00048344675,0.20026517,0.00043731162,0.0007640821,0.02584564,0.760218,0.00010730856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43450367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6050658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43450367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025227252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019125588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8639492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285289919","doi":"","title":"La divulgation préalable au procès des éléments de preuve et des moyens de défense de l'accusé en droit pénal canadien (P.G.Amyot).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0346658857466383,"score_gpt":0.30373960561168434,"score_spread":0.269073719865046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285289919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011845164,0.25161335,0.009102887,0.58475596,0.007558151,0.00008068176,0.00030361104,0.00008996444,0.13465019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44604483,0.24656022,0.013327598,0.056325335,0.01344161,0.00022775415,0.00040531487,0.00020210861,0.22346523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960686,0.0018809933,0.00012780761,0.00038656345,0.0012300607,0.00030608498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913073,0.0053703366,0.0007555717,0.00031783874,0.001753871,0.00049502647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063101947,0.00063117757,0.00040414807,0.0029015888,0.004249871,0.008813742,0.0012156055,0.008397069,0.008106546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017472895,0.00046478308,0.0005365019,0.0020331126,0.011954602,0.0067193033,0.0034935474,0.008419937,0.0015177875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008242969,0.00005400388,0.004049772,0.0005269074,0.00003324964,0.0005968858,0.015946757,0.0002330587,0.00058611634,0.6568673,0.21557474,0.10544876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016738391,0.000064044194,0.023059968,0.0030140732,0.00003477181,0.001413574,0.011376772,0.00040862936,0.001156411,0.20515478,0.7542309,0.00006929677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03696649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07710324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049455375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124019515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07350266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285940806","doi":"","title":"'Equality and Supreme Court Jurisprudence: Never the Twain Shall Meet' - Chapter in The Supreme Court of Canada and the Achievement of Social Justice: Commitment, Retrenchment or Retreat","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Constitution","score_opus":0.022800795458022972,"score_gpt":0.311787899144377,"score_spread":0.288987103686354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285940806","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027937049,0.02882491,0.0036854215,0.5403539,0.0024882755,0.000053196167,0.00011073856,0.00004223413,0.39650428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82237464,0.0052223,0.0017735099,0.09279619,0.0014719018,0.000072304865,0.000060266637,0.000093125134,0.076135784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98049253,0.005120936,0.00040837566,0.0018025554,0.0055935173,0.006582106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898726,0.0046899472,0.00054815016,0.00048321197,0.0025428815,0.0018632972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108552715,0.00040672155,0.0009507834,0.0013326572,0.036494814,0.023464592,0.0035235507,0.016982492,0.004676599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025762066,0.00051249255,0.0007859947,0.001933255,0.068235874,0.008703416,0.0067761405,0.018787028,0.0006303582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003930777,0.000009348474,0.00028360754,0.000011789593,0.0000037345299,0.00006731016,0.004609048,0.000065557644,0.000033558405,0.97273546,0.019062413,0.003114221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034032342,0.000017952847,0.0039584637,0.00046507316,0.000024411236,0.00011134241,0.01195234,0.0005255474,0.0002943082,0.6571428,0.32537705,0.0000967271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8244598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.864647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93883014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061169848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09834298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44382036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286221447","doi":"10.7202/1034457ar","title":"Le silence des textes constitutionnels canadiens - expression d’une constitution encore inachevée","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Auteur theory; Art; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.03802661926262237,"score_gpt":0.2759903942513464,"score_spread":0.23796377498872404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286221447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16500953,0.009898055,0.028213453,0.079466835,0.001438722,0.00015513471,0.00058078335,0.00017727925,0.71506023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92681485,0.0017871049,0.0020214277,0.002829924,0.00014557804,0.000060932194,0.000113937975,0.00006697072,0.066159286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946195,0.0016038938,0.00017641207,0.0005724654,0.0020982665,0.0009293847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309725,0.0029776578,0.0005669313,0.00067214674,0.0022302319,0.00045573505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038994148,0.0004167163,0.00046452487,0.0017447651,0.009772869,0.008672025,0.0015613672,0.0027123927,0.0063062073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010474027,0.00022160499,0.00040669017,0.0020677026,0.03274303,0.0043810094,0.0036787237,0.0048120264,0.0010293591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022355494,0.00000534538,0.0006469135,0.00006817823,0.0000062186928,0.00014251663,0.070688,0.00008601769,0.0006763654,0.9159454,0.003222756,0.008489957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023833643,0.000046049114,0.0068650558,0.0005963479,0.000048036865,0.00037800247,0.08313708,0.0005694056,0.0037441598,0.21163449,0.6928573,0.00010018371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42879888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43620098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5712011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02562226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035281636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.852606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286322069","doi":"","title":"The Principled Exception and the Forgotten Criterion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Witness; Judgement; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Law; Federal Rules of Evidence; Original meaning; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011957897237715997,"score_gpt":0.314395254354852,"score_spread":0.302437357117136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286322069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026772365,0.0054537966,0.26890585,0.07330691,0.0046008183,0.00034970217,0.00039032195,0.00044926893,0.619771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7661797,0.001960087,0.11197606,0.040425994,0.0043647103,0.0009369178,0.00031945467,0.0005008961,0.0733361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515504,0.014935066,0.0036277345,0.011315392,0.015560157,0.0030112702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96836513,0.014808017,0.0014197534,0.0075387754,0.006468203,0.0014001502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028967932,0.0008852932,0.0021288341,0.002376164,0.0061044837,0.009287325,0.005540199,0.012787858,0.0067562885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057557,0.0009988053,0.002141597,0.0009616842,0.035497785,0.013839268,0.008308699,0.018974658,0.0025748683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009938044,0.0000053784615,0.00009528234,0.000023267892,0.0000061578567,0.000103630904,0.000235784,0.00011811521,0.000058454323,0.9950513,0.0018904501,0.002402168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012678388,0.000011439122,0.000091804366,0.00007763041,0.0000067976257,0.00012526802,0.000078045734,0.00063077535,0.00011460847,0.9818132,0.017016707,0.000021006266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031453245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00230099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028967932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049993186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008164118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1531989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286525259","doi":"","title":"Independent Legal Representation for Victims of Sexual Assault: A Model for Delivery of Legal Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sexual assault; Legislature; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Criminology; Legal process; Process (computing); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Politics; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.028421690228102214,"score_gpt":0.34086658368091305,"score_spread":0.31244489345281085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286525259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090711325,0.0007385004,0.27069455,0.19094764,0.0009515893,0.0024358814,0.00020026135,0.0004999265,0.44282025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267188,0.0010583785,0.0998654,0.0070650475,0.0004248908,0.0023363568,0.00012566775,0.0000941726,0.062311303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930226,0.004138511,0.00015323135,0.00041829262,0.0011382588,0.001129223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959357,0.0014656717,0.0004534567,0.00038345339,0.00055706437,0.0012047528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004944454,0.0006311917,0.00038940576,0.0025453132,0.00488417,0.008194964,0.0038108046,0.0072238706,0.017063607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011967901,0.00053376635,0.0011273243,0.0015584396,0.008048416,0.0068015154,0.0059068874,0.0036916004,0.003260462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069381014,0.00066322857,0.0026328804,0.0000813288,0.000012025687,0.00040432246,0.0061433483,0.004408734,0.00028464745,0.9421055,0.011348137,0.03184657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009318809,0.0020125518,0.00412113,0.000607647,0.00011521242,0.0028321396,0.019273091,0.08398,0.00080442824,0.71761024,0.16750115,0.00021059815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009687712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01054922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017063607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007929733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016353983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057534456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286891959","doi":"","title":"R v Khawaja and the Fraught Question of Rehabilitation in Terrorism Sentencing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Terrorism; Deterrence (psychology); Trial court; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Sociology; Psychology; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.005884176239330065,"score_gpt":0.282505382553309,"score_spread":0.2766212063139789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286891959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059871215,0.054575186,0.0049503897,0.45614308,0.0024659152,0.00008974252,0.00006508889,0.00007321638,0.42176628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8874297,0.008567668,0.0013365742,0.079478666,0.001010995,0.000065345834,0.000019562627,0.00004144383,0.022050004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98677236,0.004861125,0.0005591962,0.0010253446,0.0026845194,0.0040974105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941169,0.0036739183,0.00034357735,0.00028264898,0.0009852282,0.0005977057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062631974,0.00033016122,0.00073472934,0.001217728,0.02568602,0.01377433,0.0027894329,0.020322807,0.0016882473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014174672,0.0006514442,0.00086742244,0.0011738223,0.056884952,0.006835476,0.004631571,0.019530417,0.0003097922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015735033,0.000012570139,0.00050155725,0.00007015508,0.000010533971,0.0006834048,0.022236628,0.000182045,0.00014292187,0.9491559,0.018561242,0.008427246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061865445,0.00004887537,0.0070731738,0.0015489655,0.00009164193,0.001587429,0.040938925,0.00059992564,0.000656964,0.4071466,0.5399975,0.00024820768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52612007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65427685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52612007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039245375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054911498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287127029","doi":"","title":"'Stacking the odds against the accused' : appraising the curial attitude towards amici participation in criminal matters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Odds; Political science; Jurisprudence; Compromise; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13068801411180464,"score_gpt":0.37079714021066074,"score_spread":0.2401091260988561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287127029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.530602,0.0041348664,0.0039900807,0.08946207,0.000450534,0.00013735647,0.00002293794,0.000025228224,0.3711749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854977,0.00076481304,0.00050503854,0.008418687,0.0001334915,0.000044530727,0.000004527788,0.000010369272,0.0046208706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758783,0.014991274,0.0006080047,0.00087003876,0.004683793,0.0029685725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733315,0.016567262,0.004371099,0.00075819605,0.0034585067,0.0015134347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018661184,0.0003981512,0.00037370762,0.0024120777,0.014618307,0.014414702,0.001729313,0.011775407,0.0036323348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05766625,0.0004104383,0.00047508176,0.0016946169,0.045143336,0.008174112,0.009205007,0.009271175,0.0006442407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001307374,0.000064317064,0.012446393,0.00023359033,0.000025652504,0.002879176,0.35656372,0.000135549,0.00093767437,0.5980643,0.008081849,0.020436997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006546566,0.00043281863,0.041908953,0.0026633504,0.00012438517,0.0030696809,0.62492573,0.00081787497,0.001732453,0.13862239,0.18546447,0.00017238433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012269061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023410387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018661184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006926862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069741705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09869099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287406766","doi":"10.7202/1034466ar","title":"L’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels et l’impossibilité psychologique d’agir : une réforme à deux vitesses","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05858885056913623,"score_gpt":0.3428261036675258,"score_spread":0.2842372530983896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287406766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2772203,0.022990854,0.007783192,0.31796372,0.0023230081,0.00042962213,0.00024469223,0.00012297236,0.37092164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80472416,0.0071965414,0.0029002684,0.027262233,0.00042382264,0.0002139857,0.00006128846,0.00003867668,0.15717903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946408,0.0013809777,0.00018784261,0.0004951368,0.0017619536,0.0015332269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432385,0.0012839274,0.000509882,0.00046839227,0.002433393,0.000980575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004538641,0.0004000417,0.00047332994,0.0009215491,0.011166626,0.0071062194,0.00173174,0.004809791,0.006954552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081062,0.00034793507,0.0004557801,0.0009985898,0.017022043,0.0025558162,0.003281292,0.0075460877,0.0006810183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013025031,0.00024936683,0.019312881,0.00046155075,0.00005216742,0.0010308017,0.10848198,0.00069341436,0.0021837582,0.7021468,0.057001084,0.10825592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008473893,0.00024516913,0.064580254,0.0013518345,0.00012054494,0.0004989677,0.07829156,0.0011094778,0.0027248003,0.027936613,0.82286644,0.00018970785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.782545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8656787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.782545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043077767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07257878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43747127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288463069","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2011-2012 Term","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Charter; Plaintiff; Commission; Context (archaeology); Geography","score_opus":0.027800173496849188,"score_gpt":0.31664727246753477,"score_spread":0.28884709897068556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288463069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04117378,0.16950613,0.0020975168,0.2255534,0.006766058,0.00008089151,0.00060271815,0.000060034916,0.5541595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6931434,0.103475176,0.0031630264,0.08260468,0.0074900542,0.00022314163,0.00080415036,0.00012950758,0.10896685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029887,0.0017312235,0.00055257767,0.001246491,0.004447944,0.0017227876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926317,0.0038541981,0.00051464315,0.00038389378,0.0017329814,0.0008827313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00912043,0.00038482988,0.00051607843,0.003598559,0.014250967,0.019848576,0.0014341555,0.010172581,0.0048659532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565685,0.0007272041,0.0006891271,0.0048755007,0.01847026,0.00870312,0.004496076,0.013426456,0.0005890305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017641445,0.000039684477,0.0006739798,0.00013226872,0.0000047563294,0.0002868405,0.0058463197,0.00016251173,0.0002619905,0.93306094,0.03095977,0.028553225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070952315,0.00003181154,0.0075203124,0.0006093059,0.00000767359,0.00026491386,0.0024019326,0.000095754214,0.00020593769,0.017820409,0.97098845,0.000046369467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40237603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5614874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40237603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083624735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048311684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8000679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291008671","doi":"","title":"Taking Remedies Seriously: An Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Tribunal; Theme (computing); Political science; Subject (documents); Administration of justice; Sociology; Library science","score_opus":0.03038149575380293,"score_gpt":0.3376205380709367,"score_spread":0.3072390423171338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291008671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002139997,0.33977348,0.016045043,0.14623727,0.024727669,0.00029619318,0.00041994688,0.000310996,0.47004947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047812674,0.48884457,0.021454219,0.080580875,0.03344085,0.00079958374,0.00070400146,0.00059938646,0.32576388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799335,0.00072642707,0.00013809947,0.00024519148,0.00069256884,0.00020438195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697053,0.001979894,0.00014976092,0.00010878736,0.0005167577,0.00027426085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020784065,0.0013789842,0.0009877519,0.0028140806,0.004186667,0.0076012854,0.0017900484,0.006706559,0.020926043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061530853,0.0007293347,0.0007258488,0.002578947,0.0076298704,0.012989703,0.004039242,0.009796449,0.007916944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024860377,0.00016528142,0.0004561691,0.0010978462,0.000010160169,0.00035266828,0.004084009,0.00050072715,0.00033031922,0.39850134,0.46121722,0.13325927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031336,0.00002670603,0.00035731864,0.0009097511,0.0000023745074,0.00020684415,0.0009164615,0.00010647779,0.000055408844,0.053645246,0.9437587,0.000011563155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004330388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006115404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020926043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004664806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07000452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291316273","doi":"","title":"The Purpose, Nature and Constitutionality of the Presumptions of Section 69 of the Competition Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Constitutionality; Law; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02165344818239979,"score_gpt":0.3103482877832978,"score_spread":0.28869483960089803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291316273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057609107,0.028372712,0.02843464,0.034746528,0.001921971,0.00013703806,0.00030896763,0.00006376412,0.84840536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88299704,0.018078167,0.012677565,0.014493362,0.0020305074,0.00028366866,0.00027495867,0.000069759,0.06909494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920527,0.0023733235,0.00056491897,0.00088954624,0.0030176057,0.0011019936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887093,0.007767827,0.0011255235,0.0005407358,0.0015283334,0.00032835244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007587593,0.00027819694,0.00029511153,0.002086407,0.003717881,0.008381186,0.0016122774,0.0046661943,0.002020243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012845383,0.0004616714,0.0005276353,0.001893315,0.013764888,0.0036859962,0.0017147543,0.0070031653,0.00085493847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008168166,0.000010398517,0.00035808812,0.000042185384,0.0000016892218,0.00014397087,0.0014684594,0.00020146069,0.00018715412,0.9887438,0.0020679517,0.0067667216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131163615,0.0001270269,0.007953182,0.0014259072,0.000024258768,0.0007188565,0.0027561856,0.0013991315,0.0015863461,0.32119042,0.6626395,0.00016605678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0398452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033917997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0398452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009824019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012375983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07922655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293869997","doi":"10.14288/1.0077473","title":"The reasonable person in substantive Canadian Criminal Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019115152084621542,"score_gpt":0.2168281545225562,"score_spread":0.19771300243793466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293869997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029347908,0.008346692,0.013055607,0.03732783,0.0006951538,0.00012609013,0.0002448366,0.00010131771,0.91075456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409308,0.0030433415,0.0056800633,0.0048707025,0.00026561625,0.00009348662,0.00011860427,0.000054683893,0.044942833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926112,0.0016688828,0.00018973179,0.0007713955,0.0032558525,0.0015029969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996416,0.0011942744,0.00018993212,0.00031881564,0.001467257,0.0004136939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043139136,0.00054667704,0.0004428698,0.0041567986,0.016770614,0.012285431,0.0024235016,0.0037604352,0.0047383048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011081678,0.0004223502,0.00041741543,0.0042748847,0.047647547,0.0036249717,0.003260681,0.004614478,0.00040358808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012256589,0.0000017730297,0.0000940424,0.000007929922,4.393602e-7,0.000020758698,0.001411708,0.00010391087,0.000014229294,0.99464333,0.0019873239,0.0017133435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012239173,0.0000136887,0.0029822309,0.00022238638,0.000015343665,0.00010059862,0.0056071645,0.001235765,0.000149961,0.7026803,0.28692886,0.000051473195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9390987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9291869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105468825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105468825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09683365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76523346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294124469","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1430","title":"Anger and Intent for Murder: The Supreme Court Decisions in R. v. Parent","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Anger; Law; Jurisprudence; Scope (computer science); Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09311821305916881,"score_gpt":0.35331538144474406,"score_spread":0.2601971683855753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294124469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5400815,0.0150335375,0.002933325,0.20749056,0.0011317225,0.00007566263,0.00030644741,0.000029684159,0.23291753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97802347,0.001507899,0.0005351623,0.014966068,0.00022701111,0.000025636944,0.000034342323,0.0000086391565,0.0046717366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927153,0.0032479193,0.00031919358,0.00046486175,0.001664653,0.0015880805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888254,0.008548747,0.0008829581,0.00015557278,0.0009073698,0.00067995256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007449173,0.00026182484,0.0005031787,0.00079360884,0.006538837,0.005123498,0.001316781,0.009620219,0.0015944213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029191261,0.00059493596,0.0006899501,0.0007750036,0.007905597,0.0028081308,0.0030655626,0.011315872,0.00017410169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027281378,0.00008321224,0.012454083,0.000084253035,0.000055960427,0.0046983478,0.041502718,0.00023841947,0.0008681663,0.8988985,0.026191123,0.014652389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051325286,0.0007124709,0.20161234,0.0020965582,0.0010134851,0.0045982115,0.08110879,0.0040680636,0.00706256,0.4084272,0.2881259,0.0006612085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13494554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24871767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8650545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005472702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26832014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294162132","doi":"","title":"Innocence Compensation: A Comparative Look at the American and Canadian Approaches","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Innocence; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06001516030452464,"score_gpt":0.30062165550251807,"score_spread":0.24060649519799343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294162132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19940053,0.11888953,0.00072422414,0.07681542,0.00093962834,0.00010618681,0.0005696385,0.00003272402,0.60252213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88927954,0.076932594,0.00082144525,0.011359537,0.00017219198,0.000046657624,0.00024809837,0.000036597656,0.02110338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074274,0.0013901433,0.00019225122,0.0004635725,0.0038339847,0.0033772674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919761,0.0011603531,0.00037936348,0.00016638791,0.0049390425,0.0013787906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055907755,0.0005979813,0.0008486624,0.010180507,0.029175686,0.0083748,0.0028567596,0.0030371824,0.006778985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009824395,0.00033315743,0.00068933656,0.020017123,0.008809681,0.0026100792,0.0032797905,0.003890086,0.0003842569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027924613,0.00025306025,0.037206214,0.0011672555,0.00014295737,0.0009761484,0.10559776,0.0007337021,0.00045142157,0.6156378,0.058737252,0.17881726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065622145,0.0001166073,0.13966441,0.003590181,0.00033243303,0.00049868,0.26130378,0.0005631541,0.00035700723,0.015371354,0.57787716,0.00025955326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19441086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19441086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.215883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9343692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296093784","doi":"","title":"The Plight and Solution Concerning Hearing and Adopting Lawyer's Defense","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Law; Active listening; Order (exchange); Political science; Defense attorney; Self defense; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.05002147495412592,"score_gpt":0.3034149743780358,"score_spread":0.2533934994239099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296093784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004951066,0.0031782987,0.03378605,0.9288409,0.0048956177,0.00009936366,0.000031370997,0.00009475118,0.024122642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44221038,0.0054536415,0.10170423,0.41024002,0.007041616,0.0006209439,0.000065245906,0.00023902925,0.032424834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9040669,0.049476996,0.0077727595,0.013830137,0.01529199,0.009561332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231338,0.04247758,0.006518096,0.008483722,0.0141289085,0.0052578687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09145759,0.0008995132,0.001011604,0.0022992373,0.013421314,0.017689167,0.0044776695,0.039705057,0.006243395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1445327,0.0010454208,0.0014809861,0.0012276348,0.07836852,0.0355595,0.013669913,0.053530313,0.0015964996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003340752,0.00004461442,0.00052020594,0.00009232385,0.0000174056,0.00034095353,0.006699098,0.00018558008,0.0003410314,0.94143355,0.024605334,0.025686417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006319145,0.00006470998,0.00051758485,0.00049640256,0.00002363838,0.0005087801,0.009176573,0.0008598788,0.00075286895,0.85676634,0.13063711,0.00013297852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011659015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009232153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09145759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012250278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030459724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48367977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296934204","doi":"","title":"Canada - Criminal Code in 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Law; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.026653243167066944,"score_gpt":0.29938239892290797,"score_spread":0.272729155755841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296934204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042388923,0.013588579,0.0031051969,0.12149114,0.021282049,0.0019190827,0.13532703,0.0019874596,0.6589105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042987812,0.0023954238,0.0023670108,0.013865356,0.00039832003,0.00025520162,0.011402705,0.00018357922,0.92614454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151504,0.00028413677,0.00036654752,0.00058645755,0.004954325,0.0022934633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814528,0.00083352654,0.00046592063,0.0004414347,0.014004379,0.0028020153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028004784,0.000904936,0.0010473815,0.0053048283,0.0116973305,0.009567742,0.0029548511,0.008298703,0.028923059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01560623,0.0011610836,0.0011915654,0.005369532,0.0017243046,0.0016299821,0.0020774207,0.0063543543,0.0059774765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067328765,0.00006172015,0.005092923,0.00011433125,0.00002541071,0.00013439459,0.00024401485,0.00045007258,0.00013284569,0.031884115,0.9468042,0.01498857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036596273,0.000025975454,0.027172226,0.00022231985,0.00002761963,0.00006876856,0.00046478517,0.000584209,0.00047547862,0.0016930915,0.9691637,0.000065225046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98542666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99469095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10173462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10173462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29146212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7381398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297412333","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-020","title":"Cutting off the Flow of Funds to Terrorists: Whose Funds? Which Funds? Who Decides?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Property (philosophy); Enforcement; Business; Terrorism; Flow of funds; Law and economics; Law; Convention; Subject (documents); Political science; Law enforcement; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04516146450924835,"score_gpt":0.27241493427602415,"score_spread":0.2272534697667758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297412333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060711306,0.03948912,0.0076136813,0.5554079,0.0013762721,0.00018936774,0.00043922293,0.00005206707,0.33472112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8722939,0.037726104,0.004144061,0.040971622,0.0016776797,0.00010503043,0.00013364249,0.000042771815,0.042905204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383223,0.0014869138,0.00016648666,0.00042114357,0.0016270517,0.0024662833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925162,0.0033903976,0.001263831,0.0001350848,0.0018772464,0.0008172569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040440056,0.0004185223,0.00075096387,0.0025111649,0.005256512,0.019707186,0.0010194003,0.0042557083,0.005044766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013107158,0.0004007154,0.00040820788,0.0025268977,0.01255833,0.009245055,0.0014848348,0.0063488255,0.00076498056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041827094,0.00007935185,0.014514989,0.0002909762,0.00004192701,0.00034769092,0.004628413,0.0010753406,0.00036200488,0.86831653,0.039928634,0.07037223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000419937,0.00006749333,0.03281698,0.0019390488,0.00018832891,0.00032728203,0.03291895,0.0025960235,0.0023975805,0.41315848,0.51340795,0.00013995524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34469497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42343363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34469497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033997383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047958866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68537724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299148173","doi":"","title":"Requested Individual Testimony on Canadian Bill C-13","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.08752148932701544,"score_gpt":0.3369172204130936,"score_spread":0.24939573108607815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299148173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002748641,0.0010492506,0.0011078237,0.052212894,0.004078808,0.00056724955,0.0035981229,0.00045927014,0.934178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015156244,0.00059691386,0.0013526266,0.048027802,0.0005302747,0.00020058146,0.00086725724,0.00018590654,0.93308246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027014,0.0006194009,0.00033192878,0.0004530836,0.006305576,0.0020198424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903004,0.0018274349,0.00017587967,0.0004917595,0.006227789,0.0009767315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034917255,0.0006905576,0.0008564665,0.0019053383,0.0122713735,0.004561413,0.0027967787,0.014988508,0.11438241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023757013,0.0008373656,0.0013026946,0.00193681,0.00176593,0.0011491118,0.0024520294,0.008980869,0.03723526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017770717,0.00001081278,0.00019897867,0.000028555254,0.0000049709784,0.00019294706,0.00016493205,0.000041965697,0.00020640253,0.02014165,0.97307056,0.0059204637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014537481,0.000010673648,0.0013300086,0.00007963539,0.00001145315,0.000118700984,0.0002747682,0.00015069413,0.00032653156,0.002132713,0.99551386,0.00003650706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7450554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8795231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25494462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024605487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05984345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51289207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299250469","doi":"10.14288/1.0077753","title":"A general perspective of Canadian constitutional interpretation as illustrated by the criminal law power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Power (physics); Criminal law; Constitutional law; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.023728478062008694,"score_gpt":0.2254467550614493,"score_spread":0.2017182769994406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299250469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047076866,0.0025171568,0.016276509,0.016276151,0.00032261512,0.00006590578,0.0001936273,0.00005908933,0.9595813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73983264,0.006378254,0.034483723,0.0058373166,0.0006016996,0.00032126775,0.00030936147,0.00024460958,0.2119911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99350053,0.0021209638,0.0001466574,0.0006300953,0.0023577875,0.0012439231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841094,0.00060910475,0.000080136306,0.00015198444,0.000590594,0.00015726392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036652265,0.0011369289,0.000850526,0.0076826545,0.020561304,0.01936404,0.0033612251,0.0037151217,0.011801431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052924575,0.00069608534,0.0009932109,0.008024237,0.05054531,0.0072126724,0.0036766343,0.006449709,0.0010156222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011248384,7.5806275e-7,0.000027648237,0.000004788446,6.4620974e-7,0.000016928563,0.00081878604,0.00008285888,0.000010028273,0.99732685,0.0008087338,0.00090090814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010555721,0.0000071176137,0.00048032697,0.00013550499,0.000011955827,0.00006942727,0.0033545084,0.0010687383,0.000105287516,0.7910317,0.20369382,0.00003115387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.887086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8855428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12327547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12327547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096942455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89443034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300178100","doi":"","title":"Hearsay after Starr","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Law; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05110651621350291,"score_gpt":0.41332294812748943,"score_spread":0.3622164319139865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300178100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008540184,0.049315274,0.0018084932,0.28109393,0.11470648,0.00008725037,0.0009111314,0.0006334517,0.55059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006145154,0.009239386,0.00038220553,0.0331021,0.0055019124,0.000024427862,0.00017739314,0.00023151153,0.94519603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980413,0.00029321498,0.00009149739,0.00036669252,0.00097300665,0.00023428671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952166,0.0009042414,0.00014374507,0.0002585539,0.0028323228,0.00064454763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001948828,0.0005635222,0.0006556235,0.0014130642,0.004748653,0.005359052,0.0010737921,0.0030919914,0.1926735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013026129,0.00035385732,0.00040187294,0.0011680033,0.0015710689,0.0040699947,0.002331332,0.005947141,0.10399096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010797486,0.0000035352155,0.00003730965,0.00004226544,0.0000013741936,0.00005597718,0.00014625204,0.0000074543905,0.000033344983,0.007702495,0.9725481,0.019410998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021499873,0.0000036445706,0.00008590968,0.00006735204,0.0000010485228,0.00006363046,0.0001836034,0.0000076018364,0.00003195628,0.0012199782,0.99832886,0.000004239921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027659522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047971047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1926735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025765821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045451517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6445571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300581667","doi":"","title":"Benefits Provided, Hidden and Denied: A Critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's Test in \"Auton v. British Columbia\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.017167560847835696,"score_gpt":0.24367490213500673,"score_spread":0.22650734128717104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300581667","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04351227,0.009162737,0.0055290842,0.5399894,0.0019909136,0.00015757573,0.0013039185,0.00011746407,0.3982366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8000338,0.0030934543,0.0035835332,0.14096302,0.0012890125,0.00016990324,0.0002132882,0.00016819676,0.050485723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804561,0.003267736,0.00066327525,0.0019478332,0.0095363185,0.0041287495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97269857,0.014642414,0.0005980974,0.00081638765,0.009749743,0.00149483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016562028,0.0008354345,0.0017174926,0.0042063165,0.022392197,0.018473666,0.0091605205,0.028746678,0.005604703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04982969,0.0010052995,0.0012228523,0.005281692,0.032525513,0.0048121084,0.004160037,0.026271813,0.00059630576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005371183,0.000014635958,0.0011261763,0.00007470352,0.00004359259,0.00026898924,0.006386743,0.00040806425,0.00012406548,0.8992158,0.08366428,0.008619242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029040914,0.000041044634,0.010307332,0.001988396,0.0005242924,0.00027139543,0.014153304,0.003592275,0.0010857298,0.5275043,0.43981305,0.00042839334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09603207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09603207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16201502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6967647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302104317","doi":"","title":"Canadian Evidence Law in a Nutshell","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.056341360550383315,"score_gpt":0.33541577639741815,"score_spread":0.27907441584703485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302104317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007460835,0.014901763,0.005249907,0.051153444,0.0027948571,0.0001373531,0.0011524823,0.00024912073,0.92361504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032371365,0.015609228,0.009755419,0.019390691,0.0008114442,0.00014433636,0.0005987524,0.00029288535,0.9210258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544144,0.00036964286,0.00015232305,0.0003840556,0.0031591326,0.00049338856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944523,0.00087239675,0.00010944441,0.00028850167,0.00379456,0.00048279515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027863719,0.0011586237,0.0009248653,0.006575338,0.008744686,0.01605232,0.0033557683,0.0067897416,0.031682976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010851433,0.0012273658,0.0007819176,0.007342368,0.008894776,0.00540669,0.0022351248,0.0075005507,0.0051379264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033912481,0.0000058869923,0.000102756814,0.00005801908,0.00000545376,0.00003939667,0.00029484168,0.00019396345,0.000036633308,0.619688,0.36305377,0.016517868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003967259,0.0000023141522,0.00031897862,0.00014612946,0.0000096286185,0.00004963817,0.00021476118,0.00019374839,0.00005575666,0.07315733,0.9258231,0.000024729929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96134156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98402125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91206497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087935045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15839128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6380164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303367599","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Sentences Under Section 231(5)(e) Post-Luxton","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Criminal code; Charter; Supreme court; Life imprisonment; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Imprisonment; Due Process Clause; Criminal law; Psychology; Prison","score_opus":0.2818321278958325,"score_gpt":0.35729975043200346,"score_spread":0.07546762253617095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303367599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44558898,0.0039296974,0.013117711,0.12303372,0.0035415827,0.00064062263,0.0012019088,0.00036267168,0.40858316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377766,0.00066237315,0.00727449,0.02864229,0.00066586933,0.00021706961,0.00017119067,0.000041811923,0.024548355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850499,0.0024512229,0.0019347784,0.0025448753,0.004649353,0.0033698243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251617,0.008928999,0.0012029322,0.0016300648,0.004684379,0.0010374408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016770812,0.00025321526,0.00060026516,0.001118527,0.0064593726,0.008635834,0.0037323039,0.0092825,0.0021675187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026891857,0.00091881363,0.00066782633,0.00064809213,0.012005931,0.0032685753,0.0032499724,0.010837453,0.00045520763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000713314,0.000057439287,0.003985834,0.00008782485,0.00001627853,0.000543557,0.0064887833,0.0005129608,0.0030606985,0.9529081,0.019416906,0.012850267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000529198,0.0010890593,0.06912084,0.002364821,0.00047443874,0.0015475479,0.018658714,0.007247738,0.02048531,0.29758835,0.5797915,0.0011025378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3252063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4743178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6747937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013652014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040756214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64662683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306320626","doi":"","title":"Terrorism, Law & Democracy: How is Canada Changing Following September 11","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024377414429212138,"score_gpt":0.2948682507291748,"score_spread":0.2704908362999626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306320626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20216744,0.0050274916,0.00044675026,0.6440052,0.0016074062,0.00013735643,0.003014838,0.0000778058,0.14351569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87847877,0.0040939497,0.0005893674,0.049867466,0.0002788981,0.000051750965,0.0008406362,0.000088518456,0.06571063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.989479,0.0011241006,0.00022538211,0.0004713225,0.0027958644,0.0059042913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731495,0.0025082538,0.0014785789,0.00036379768,0.011574794,0.0109251365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047065183,0.00021367942,0.00048367982,0.0032697902,0.02530339,0.017265579,0.0027048872,0.0062682563,0.018010242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028043682,0.00041105365,0.00065842783,0.007072269,0.006567369,0.004006433,0.0042770873,0.006892526,0.00095216866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046264398,0.00020497151,0.14123994,0.00036906873,0.00017240459,0.0014922116,0.03517233,0.001293621,0.00046934915,0.16685905,0.5234998,0.1287645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081531034,0.00007369419,0.22659278,0.00052673917,0.00010871858,0.00016332736,0.12652938,0.0006992563,0.00045610918,0.014735912,0.6297907,0.00024188802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99720347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1980481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1980481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40692797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9301505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311034161","doi":"","title":"The Analytical Structure of Reasonableness Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Deference; Political science; Law; Nothing; Law and economics; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01954854158999688,"score_gpt":0.33863660061885276,"score_spread":0.3190880590288559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311034161","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012708101,0.0074684387,0.76612484,0.046195623,0.0010012812,0.0011218498,0.0002752099,0.0004340661,0.16467057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53717875,0.0049557583,0.40408778,0.0075120986,0.0032494399,0.002177582,0.0004402162,0.00038781873,0.040010545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91934663,0.047736354,0.004664641,0.007284388,0.018217407,0.0027504903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9030451,0.06169162,0.006122902,0.008915305,0.018839212,0.0013859331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05305156,0.00078479346,0.0014177077,0.010524482,0.0051069437,0.014724242,0.0026155491,0.004326364,0.0058640265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11719772,0.001306926,0.001925071,0.0048997686,0.02484071,0.011970388,0.0057970774,0.006056104,0.0022837634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054110133,0.0000074802842,0.00013933472,0.000041286403,0.00000772834,0.00003351865,0.00039043563,0.00045558004,0.0000642818,0.98763275,0.001719742,0.009502355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012945544,0.000016137563,0.00018166967,0.000101511316,0.000010359764,0.000054190405,0.00013357072,0.002811439,0.0002579113,0.9719416,0.024451016,0.000027703603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004785122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032671248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05305156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016316706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01922817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313177308","doi":"10.2307/744302","title":"The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Face (sociological concept); Penal code; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.0707177499783157,"score_gpt":0.3285282453521934,"score_spread":0.2578104953738777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313177308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13506755,0.21258417,0.009942957,0.07233627,0.0017848981,0.00009658568,0.0011441059,0.00004246904,0.56700104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84672785,0.12737644,0.0030522486,0.002761282,0.001570044,0.0000855746,0.00046167267,0.000067021356,0.017897788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949108,0.0029488294,0.00023313459,0.00055071403,0.0010623,0.00029425116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749316,0.00693004,0.0016251648,0.00082525867,0.002768348,0.00035802234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913907,0.00021989424,0.00028807038,0.009844463,0.0035973438,0.005300582,0.00059727073,0.0012769343,0.0031023873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020317296,0.00031148622,0.00015783579,0.010511033,0.012413971,0.0076080975,0.0021136678,0.0025831047,0.00043523748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018265657,0.00001294324,0.0023461825,0.00022953383,0.0000109113025,0.00012192473,0.012991737,0.00024742854,0.000079772064,0.91283464,0.010871655,0.0602351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032121632,0.00004217188,0.013286326,0.0014266366,0.000017892871,0.00032801097,0.010717964,0.00035094723,0.00040364123,0.114409156,0.8589833,0.00003072435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013410112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016314803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013410112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008207384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029712303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059548974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317275053","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1462","title":"The Legislative History of Mandatory Minimum Penalties of Imprisonment in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Legislature; Legislative history; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030787884353172725,"score_gpt":0.26648430801171247,"score_spread":0.23569642365853974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317275053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30431557,0.02970319,0.0037638561,0.35056898,0.005093454,0.00057914475,0.005326998,0.0005023996,0.3001465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7979949,0.010329165,0.003212276,0.07236978,0.0010905096,0.00026001091,0.0010112561,0.00025571045,0.11347638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98016787,0.0014722706,0.001093711,0.0018676462,0.0076192045,0.0077792658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941158,0.012708898,0.0031415862,0.0012240836,0.03356106,0.008206388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012076907,0.0005322293,0.0010633483,0.00582706,0.022893189,0.011774691,0.0054866644,0.00879231,0.0070094024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044537935,0.0022648673,0.001138488,0.0068239067,0.0071917414,0.0025021667,0.003409508,0.01462324,0.0004209565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004446246,0.00039112248,0.040920336,0.0010366666,0.00025425668,0.0009823781,0.022089014,0.0040413174,0.0035632285,0.48969623,0.30420846,0.13237242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010010973,0.0001445432,0.21380843,0.0011203674,0.00018993666,0.00015017176,0.0061007994,0.002075644,0.002378197,0.005498451,0.7679782,0.00045524092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99603575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28295845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28295845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4106162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8316666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319399261","doi":"10.7202/1027416ar","title":"Simon DesCôteaux, Guide du praticien pour le partage des régimes de retraite, Brossard, Publications CCH Ltée, 2002, 209 pages, ISBN 2-89366-350-8 Jean-Claude Hébert, Le droit pénal des affaires. Éditions Yvon Blais, Cowansville, 2002, 831 pages, ISBN 2-89451-607-X Hubert Reid, La réforme du Code de procédure civile, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2002, 395 pages, ISBN 2-89127-575-6","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.028630920733541034,"score_gpt":0.2616395813973873,"score_spread":0.23300866066384626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319399261","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040266686,0.6237154,0.005010556,0.038346704,0.008145273,0.00012409643,0.0015547416,0.00055474014,0.32214582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051045017,0.36571378,0.0046316506,0.0075655417,0.001999019,0.00017619012,0.0009506476,0.00040562812,0.6134531],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774605,0.0005457213,0.00020237513,0.00035112686,0.0010379958,0.00011677007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979867,0.0009656374,0.00016254908,0.000086204935,0.000642239,0.0001568136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018817444,0.0019766337,0.0012329727,0.004458959,0.0024607189,0.0052007833,0.0016506205,0.004671091,0.10455272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051185493,0.00096034736,0.0005242305,0.0050345915,0.002369689,0.008444601,0.00171698,0.00486611,0.077827185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117719665,0.000010891464,0.000072374045,0.00030874085,0.0000039230476,0.000040200903,0.00044967647,0.000082093095,0.00007507151,0.017068729,0.90663123,0.07524518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027019303,0.00000339145,0.00017779974,0.00025841745,0.0000014605516,0.00007426009,0.00013253035,0.000020070993,0.000039968312,0.00329646,0.99598616,0.000006687049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056061763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10406721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10455272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005279393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005465834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3497637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322183196","doi":"10.5623/cig2013-023","title":"Doubtful Boundaries, Hierarchy of Evidence, Well Triangulated Evidence and Procedural Diligence: <i>Morrison v. Van Den Tillaart</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Diligence; Due diligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.0843028826421699,"score_gpt":0.3440898575742523,"score_spread":0.2597869749320824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322183196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027301665,0.040122528,0.011991513,0.9281001,0.002538216,0.0001055166,0.00015750711,0.000066816596,0.014187624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42244455,0.0432594,0.07062319,0.44115123,0.013710905,0.00088436826,0.00021542434,0.00026776557,0.0074431305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8711398,0.08574526,0.01203453,0.008261561,0.019919148,0.0028996244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4686219,0.49169385,0.012022053,0.0076998575,0.017175943,0.0027863402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1314665,0.0007658814,0.0022951958,0.008722888,0.0061245575,0.024088025,0.007535471,0.026199527,0.0039268783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42421967,0.0015077185,0.0019706404,0.005579256,0.0822718,0.02405756,0.011296129,0.022886526,0.0006052165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000696025,0.000013742886,0.001387275,0.00064023066,0.00014809304,0.000340141,0.00588657,0.0004308769,0.00007468533,0.8313307,0.13334471,0.026333375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005187901,0.000020112004,0.0009186418,0.0024776151,0.000098590936,0.00028240323,0.0027755597,0.0008502605,0.00022690331,0.9425072,0.049691413,0.000099514975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033921286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04938453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1314665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013402796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026506053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324944905","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000294636.99123.bf","title":"Fighting C. Difficile","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.054503347554294125,"score_gpt":0.36510889292721227,"score_spread":0.3106055453729181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324944905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070127035,0.19429745,0.0042179334,0.49573514,0.16301946,0.00022392366,0.0008766272,0.001710392,0.13290636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041838154,0.17536296,0.008120131,0.50064385,0.05892933,0.00027619622,0.0018710206,0.00039571768,0.2125626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727815,0.00050882547,0.00013505091,0.000428828,0.0010308478,0.0006183491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935183,0.0006793655,0.0004264867,0.00032424796,0.0019137209,0.0031378479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026540037,0.0011336235,0.0008297114,0.0010662957,0.001522752,0.0036235203,0.0011715407,0.0050634416,0.053147703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009691551,0.00035184575,0.001097296,0.0004718486,0.0011726421,0.0028872301,0.0036265824,0.008832035,0.022869458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093074486,0.0001151413,0.00074355706,0.0003694997,0.000038745824,0.000100731806,0.00010346103,0.000041954598,0.0010704694,0.0028925547,0.86198634,0.13244455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006114242,0.00023684869,0.0008514157,0.00044013682,0.000020918504,0.0003810489,0.00013885651,0.000072804156,0.0003472067,0.001384781,0.99604934,0.000015529073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027239707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039092195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053147703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012846016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003079154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17779678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325869288","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2015.1084787","title":"The Prime Minister v the Chief Justice of Canada: the Attorney General's failure of responsibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10879450810990925,"score_gpt":0.37673589949381714,"score_spread":0.2679413913839079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325869288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039745115,0.0050226026,0.00045366713,0.9030424,0.0018945435,0.000038209142,0.00014795328,0.000030246594,0.04962528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55330324,0.0042004143,0.0008005446,0.3842464,0.0009857013,0.000032327298,0.00006251995,0.00011760708,0.05625135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824752,0.0035054921,0.0005488213,0.0014829506,0.0049566887,0.007030941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701047,0.0139941005,0.0013106808,0.0006458965,0.007865974,0.006078557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016817793,0.00060599047,0.0012298954,0.001651864,0.03626199,0.014437861,0.004719655,0.03971304,0.0047067953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061954137,0.0010449258,0.00084022054,0.0024618672,0.022154273,0.0066333315,0.0043088803,0.041328724,0.000447894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019312573,0.00006329352,0.008271494,0.00017475565,0.00014045347,0.0020043107,0.028041327,0.0006642184,0.00040542922,0.42711377,0.5141004,0.018827533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034896433,0.0001069464,0.031567294,0.0017099369,0.00056039164,0.0009430821,0.07320933,0.0021163132,0.0022830523,0.18632826,0.7001588,0.0006675824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08280558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34751624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6007993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327512905","doi":"","title":"Coherence and the Committed Civilian: Justice Lebel's Contributions to Canadian Accident Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Accident (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Economics; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023814389727191007,"score_gpt":0.3298915477457478,"score_spread":0.3060771580185568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327512905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14363745,0.026330845,0.0021677548,0.5120669,0.002173144,0.00009982685,0.00036693146,0.00004166394,0.31311542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96487814,0.0035254327,0.00054719084,0.009755443,0.00035740327,0.000020732421,0.000040112387,0.00003530055,0.020840202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083287,0.0020743525,0.0002594916,0.0008119234,0.00333586,0.0026854922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749714,0.011425408,0.00075123657,0.00084302085,0.008618072,0.00339086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010563095,0.00049848715,0.00069188763,0.005626078,0.04870684,0.017659852,0.0035914688,0.0074459687,0.008466729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04991276,0.0005100009,0.00049110566,0.0069131358,0.048889283,0.0058945436,0.008327564,0.011128991,0.00028954598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007911804,0.000029354724,0.0045745648,0.00010745788,0.00003168879,0.0002540807,0.075378425,0.00038298685,0.00007198849,0.82991594,0.06652717,0.022647131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113351576,0.000039926683,0.0369716,0.0008520378,0.00015130438,0.00023220891,0.1499986,0.000849698,0.0003437946,0.35689,0.45331973,0.00023777748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99336994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15083596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15083596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22077306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329886300","doi":"10.1515/jetl-2013-0006","title":"Jacques De Mol,Le dommage psychique – Du traumatisme à l’expertise (Larcier, Bruxelles 2012). xviii + 314 pp. ISBN-10: 2804451968; ISNB-13: 9782804451967. € 90.00 (paperback).","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Tort Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tort; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.024034279821950843,"score_gpt":0.2709604210683596,"score_spread":0.24692614124640877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329886300","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005001924,0.7789138,0.0009990768,0.08562178,0.029334804,0.000039562667,0.00067351747,0.00020771424,0.10370956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007541669,0.48224354,0.0013780345,0.013805989,0.011810699,0.00007458398,0.0007380021,0.00038361162,0.48202386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988607,0.00024322582,0.00008405603,0.00015401994,0.0005660825,0.00009194065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985549,0.00068948977,0.00014149374,0.000041645882,0.00033860627,0.00023375967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011409884,0.0013535867,0.00090327853,0.002218427,0.0011153304,0.0053858655,0.0010256065,0.0042805737,0.13801639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004368048,0.00068504363,0.00049631594,0.0021707243,0.0014526186,0.0076418812,0.0018479871,0.0043598707,0.0842283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020370984,0.0000063677358,0.000051905947,0.00026733815,0.0000043157897,0.000032568638,0.00014236185,0.000021019772,0.000074862626,0.0019137692,0.9495274,0.04793772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055279766,0.0000067440656,0.00064417504,0.00056352565,0.000003874162,0.0002076448,0.00027299888,0.000024409428,0.00008056183,0.0015444257,0.9966349,0.000011187072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009764594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014533366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13801639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022584512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021363208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4617108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331213455","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpr193","title":"Recipe for a new tort? Common law right to privacy in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Denial; Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.11533280217112857,"score_gpt":0.3759141895787113,"score_spread":0.26058138740758274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331213455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817294,0.006109788,0.003736,0.51995325,0.0011248976,0.00018667676,0.0007865819,0.00007089783,0.38630256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76967674,0.006613138,0.0059042564,0.064150885,0.0004971664,0.00010176274,0.0003229099,0.00007278025,0.15266044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421847,0.0005248947,0.00023342384,0.00051938446,0.0026375526,0.0018663767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441165,0.0012474897,0.0003926797,0.00045886452,0.0020274322,0.0014618679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030102145,0.00026766624,0.0004046452,0.00087864377,0.017183842,0.007284127,0.0015227775,0.0062768017,0.009239296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009790105,0.00058984035,0.0006445902,0.0014702149,0.011144198,0.0042309044,0.003448784,0.005284834,0.00057053455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009382899,0.000039528182,0.010493147,0.00013978679,0.00003313458,0.0013885698,0.013076161,0.00050221535,0.0011394098,0.8004936,0.14904705,0.023553653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087188455,0.000037455437,0.026749566,0.00046988807,0.00007593009,0.0005659444,0.011064951,0.0009081807,0.0005891536,0.07817233,0.8811029,0.00017650993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10160618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10160618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17383854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7372079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333036059","doi":"","title":"Reconciliation and Third-Party Interests: Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; White (mutation); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02995919190446803,"score_gpt":0.3040051644537528,"score_spread":0.27404597254928476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333036059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41219985,0.0037092692,0.0011457516,0.10501105,0.00038859484,0.00014978352,0.0002392509,0.000029805671,0.47712666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95935655,0.00060536724,0.00024196522,0.011959765,0.000038243295,0.000055752505,0.00006411226,0.00001841699,0.027659902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98698205,0.004231735,0.00038220987,0.0005254802,0.0021778825,0.005700806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907204,0.0049923817,0.00056991953,0.0005576398,0.002019985,0.0011395265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013243538,0.00024086048,0.00065921334,0.001519988,0.024925299,0.009411047,0.0027644918,0.008738752,0.008333958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029538045,0.00041586332,0.0004689224,0.002461172,0.008464715,0.0046704593,0.0066303383,0.0124285305,0.00045852415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040751853,0.00017706474,0.035249293,0.00018354773,0.000094862015,0.005392054,0.14265504,0.00050637213,0.00055557647,0.6354224,0.11312576,0.0662304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027153007,0.0001383408,0.101635024,0.0013009227,0.00048760232,0.0015410742,0.32207432,0.00277558,0.0033585415,0.14223279,0.42386848,0.00031582956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8121552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9378121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18784481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039165065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04868665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3779021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335441580","doi":"10.14288/1.0102845","title":"Parole, public safety and the administration of justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Political science; Criminology; Administration of justice; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.014895006089976773,"score_gpt":0.22451115133868643,"score_spread":0.20961614524870967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335441580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04321924,0.0037511971,0.0011079734,0.052598868,0.001297757,0.00029003678,0.0029480304,0.00023528427,0.8945516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46035564,0.002195031,0.0015212091,0.011445707,0.00048448352,0.00037848545,0.0017792695,0.000068915324,0.5217713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656016,0.00084999885,0.00020091975,0.00015048884,0.0015776774,0.00066083967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954471,0.0013034928,0.0005471059,0.000422408,0.001506094,0.00077386573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021902744,0.0001699701,0.0003969105,0.0017940789,0.007372746,0.0027604655,0.00085886876,0.0024140875,0.041214556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013282622,0.00034057657,0.0002688858,0.0010893345,0.0019228196,0.0012255796,0.0017595751,0.0022624098,0.011129715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016391376,0.00014195935,0.00889911,0.00020534094,0.000020539059,0.0006138764,0.004330622,0.00007365807,0.0009393061,0.10781859,0.74393696,0.13285613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112315,0.0002227329,0.12362884,0.0005067678,0.000026301537,0.0005832553,0.009276494,0.00019850935,0.00079731696,0.018470826,0.8461757,0.00006217596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089568496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29236338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089568496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025929592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008429649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17809433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336643544","doi":"","title":"Relevance, Social Context and Poverty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Commit; Inference; Context (archaeology); Jury; Common sense; Order (exchange); Psychology; Criminal justice; Poverty; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01647448164382174,"score_gpt":0.2954714832558532,"score_spread":0.27899700161203145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336643544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5247658,0.008206545,0.012995622,0.09609211,0.0007073009,0.00020293269,0.00014478057,0.000038984144,0.35684597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700385,0.000619426,0.00059464894,0.0009887342,0.00009301563,0.00002425537,0.0000072818934,0.0000050173885,0.00066372624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812556,0.012980711,0.00060518435,0.0010845532,0.0028079115,0.0012660511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721453,0.019050846,0.0029812024,0.0014512159,0.002682105,0.0016892705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121261375,0.00035244264,0.0006591169,0.0037908037,0.00861486,0.0068156417,0.0008766631,0.003001241,0.004658191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0478877,0.00030262928,0.00040449208,0.0018446125,0.03708095,0.0099095,0.013303342,0.0034544773,0.00025922694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015827201,0.00018833826,0.03556857,0.0005663967,0.000089535395,0.002670732,0.1281225,0.00087001146,0.0005649208,0.7634932,0.0059552663,0.06175224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003266966,0.00015951064,0.02394281,0.00060337083,0.000041859195,0.0012135745,0.09203112,0.0006248031,0.0003291558,0.83388805,0.047067404,0.000065637694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032733856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004791932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121261375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039665406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034703277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06412989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337467981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1466","title":"Searching for Smith: The Constitutionality of Mandatory Sentences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Parliament; Punitive damages; Proportionality (law); Political science; Constitutional review; Constitution; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.09996215917625473,"score_gpt":0.391120778265037,"score_spread":0.29115861908878227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337467981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23319878,0.021028893,0.018356523,0.13338551,0.0013249713,0.00020816665,0.00039949376,0.0002631626,0.59183455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682529,0.0019882827,0.00315157,0.010749877,0.0002730021,0.0000648589,0.000051574683,0.000040369167,0.015427591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868335,0.0031625999,0.00086665567,0.0016280204,0.004602534,0.002906652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748716,0.017394325,0.0020248736,0.0008248632,0.0039338083,0.00095047976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013026909,0.00032296812,0.00073792133,0.0017521756,0.010120528,0.0092064245,0.0030933775,0.006238222,0.0031436814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040195465,0.0008845039,0.00043284864,0.0012359428,0.01594143,0.005540653,0.0031439564,0.008361142,0.00037345797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029564351,0.000012228791,0.00082736847,0.000072896095,0.000007929624,0.00023168785,0.0036679872,0.00013836904,0.0005174995,0.97477156,0.005696003,0.014026952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116575124,0.0002575615,0.022792397,0.001647574,0.00023857057,0.0006988773,0.008742405,0.0026577911,0.007528652,0.6372476,0.31774667,0.00032539098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42153257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63001436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42153257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02003574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045924637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83815795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337488397","doi":"10.7202/1035637ar","title":"Arbitres de griefs, tribunaux des droits de la personne et normes de contrôle judiciaire : une critique des arrêts Ross et Green Bay","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02014792303526885,"score_gpt":0.3175606948947046,"score_spread":0.29741277185943576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337488397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084583566,0.023664752,0.034223236,0.2864975,0.0009155289,0.00011234751,0.00020500383,0.00006287201,0.5697352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951244,0.005151181,0.0040007327,0.010116387,0.00027354923,0.000077050674,0.000031892225,0.00003540633,0.02906979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859919,0.0050684344,0.00041741156,0.0013998494,0.0057547227,0.001367774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883717,0.0064628962,0.00087743875,0.0007934078,0.0029574782,0.0005371197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011599871,0.00047213314,0.00074182823,0.0020035726,0.009480141,0.012880464,0.0028764354,0.005955121,0.0034149059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019393152,0.000382534,0.0005231555,0.0019368706,0.068922475,0.005889935,0.004769465,0.0096085,0.00030045016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039886604,0.0000025448235,0.00020501911,0.00001989788,0.0000032144683,0.000027501006,0.0061445464,0.00006562986,0.000033868848,0.98930734,0.0015765873,0.00260987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002962773,0.000022713295,0.0059687817,0.0005895661,0.00003196548,0.00011004826,0.019991284,0.0009205532,0.00048581415,0.8064891,0.1652941,0.000066385284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5681833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59644437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4318167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035753373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040579073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8687195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337802252","doi":"10.14288/1.0076625","title":"The Canadian Criminal Code: Past, Present, and Future?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.028706611623950117,"score_gpt":0.217428137935286,"score_spread":0.1887215263113359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337802252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02147956,0.15439735,0.0004088528,0.67673826,0.0041667684,0.00003668094,0.0024891414,0.00007967994,0.14020361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6147555,0.23735377,0.002218759,0.06444101,0.0028309496,0.00010276421,0.002383828,0.00010746389,0.075806014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931543,0.0007397227,0.0001516437,0.00059278496,0.0028309291,0.0025307056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98068845,0.001721801,0.00090739375,0.0004680119,0.011244923,0.0049693417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049688467,0.00068817014,0.00079011667,0.008240083,0.01921226,0.015667684,0.0028273317,0.0052828575,0.017440123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014668919,0.0004248735,0.0005154752,0.015428759,0.014976412,0.008539734,0.0032741744,0.0046739983,0.0014224261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083708255,0.000067929635,0.018252522,0.000711361,0.000033117216,0.0002790162,0.008515419,0.00025994956,0.00013198187,0.16439292,0.5498934,0.25737876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013672377,0.000022259266,0.043125633,0.002362035,0.000045182765,0.00017897793,0.034320556,0.00035595303,0.0001215233,0.014144926,0.90513855,0.000170605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1771232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1771232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29620773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95442045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338010741","doi":"10.14288/1.0077737","title":"Terrorism and the administration of justice in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Administration (probate law); Political science; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Administration of justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02157187330370656,"score_gpt":0.20253212678228802,"score_spread":0.18096025347858147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338010741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17502166,0.024489425,0.0032275785,0.24125291,0.0022902733,0.00024619143,0.00068117364,0.00016358755,0.55262727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8801903,0.009750648,0.0018217738,0.027322479,0.00024448632,0.000059482394,0.00014491234,0.00006290993,0.08040309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889361,0.0010381929,0.0002218423,0.0006979197,0.0031614231,0.0059444993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918976,0.0014260347,0.0005429738,0.00017043832,0.0030037095,0.0029592642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003560451,0.00031785225,0.00043728336,0.0018147634,0.038263127,0.013333997,0.0022030512,0.0037514144,0.009372207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008676462,0.0006114178,0.00053567206,0.003514089,0.014115645,0.0023166223,0.0049532615,0.008201978,0.00040712967],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385794,0.00005199641,0.0077397404,0.00020837455,0.000030397401,0.00081839174,0.021550793,0.0014829997,0.0004006104,0.8697603,0.06450276,0.03338992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005851297,0.00005836962,0.044269145,0.0007761248,0.000058760023,0.0001824504,0.031914007,0.0015437227,0.0005650328,0.033061545,0.8872408,0.0002715487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34514406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.34514406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4454325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7595401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338304353","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448","title":"Hearsay by Implication: <i>R</i> v <i>Baldree</i>","year":2014,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0907127877805838,"score_gpt":0.3793831550748223,"score_spread":0.2886703672942385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338304353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006325491,0.002331703,0.0082770735,0.5504589,0.032602,0.00008893224,0.0004018233,0.00041489,0.3990993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2675777,0.0012054573,0.0036042056,0.37575874,0.015150016,0.00014399576,0.00018263265,0.00042354202,0.33595374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964761,0.0010037931,0.0002106327,0.00097192655,0.0008349942,0.0005025419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919709,0.0045636054,0.00046195177,0.0005510599,0.0020541216,0.00039832114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037427119,0.00046991825,0.0007210376,0.0007762819,0.005832372,0.0063247276,0.0021797856,0.010959313,0.036965057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036509275,0.00042055675,0.0005868767,0.00054576725,0.005205554,0.004504936,0.0026300563,0.013166782,0.009639668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054509586,0.000014575193,0.00043375295,0.00007393216,0.000021137565,0.00059337536,0.0028432067,0.000046045567,0.00047412366,0.3704295,0.6123701,0.012645734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039595674,0.000029422677,0.0011455405,0.00027473475,0.000052390602,0.0011516853,0.003050635,0.0005829236,0.0016742464,0.15476447,0.83714694,0.00008751004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03735504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041382704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03735504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036966025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045393645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123660386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339012338","doi":"","title":"Separating Minimal Impairment from Balancing: A Comment on R. v. Sharpe (B.C.C.A.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Balancing test; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01819409341828528,"score_gpt":0.30873847043149727,"score_spread":0.290544377013212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339012338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016500182,0.0048913606,0.0008335209,0.972429,0.0050810664,0.000050264334,0.00018913022,0.00004484352,0.014830711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01261074,0.001147517,0.0007359972,0.97669834,0.0032613568,0.00006440773,0.00002423513,0.00003098993,0.005426463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97488993,0.006073496,0.001986041,0.006021825,0.0072850394,0.0037437961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702528,0.020804824,0.0012792033,0.00095393806,0.0052550677,0.0014541075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029674664,0.0019126622,0.0030054813,0.0017653527,0.01193626,0.011861725,0.009633515,0.10483356,0.004704917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06523214,0.00224789,0.004048756,0.0021674526,0.028638653,0.011686636,0.005800225,0.082443155,0.0028860976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007977772,0.000031773354,0.0004038959,0.00023281811,0.000051693984,0.0006240657,0.00400496,0.0002526688,0.00047431208,0.35370374,0.63234204,0.007798267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002717209,0.00015738346,0.0029538923,0.0019425647,0.00021841488,0.0008522508,0.004436547,0.000932047,0.0011985309,0.14760399,0.83890164,0.0005310492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27369508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33520782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27369508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014659782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026000742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.544204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340332448","doi":"10.7202/1035752ar","title":"Le renvoi des jeunes contrevenants devant une juridiction compétente pour adulte","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02720262707741394,"score_gpt":0.274729090381779,"score_spread":0.24752646330436506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340332448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76927,0.013172429,0.0029175365,0.01795411,0.0011761127,0.00033122775,0.00020021219,0.00007984439,0.19489849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.844354,0.003546916,0.0018491908,0.0058864844,0.0002557784,0.0002256152,0.00014850702,0.000045578323,0.14368793],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254966,0.0022878395,0.0006021478,0.00086876226,0.0014922321,0.0021992803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920746,0.0031151434,0.001644369,0.00051534886,0.001666982,0.0009836347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057495157,0.00030065275,0.00037145324,0.0008976366,0.008756788,0.0041386764,0.001240438,0.0023469687,0.0057179043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017768675,0.0005442135,0.00037528152,0.0006661691,0.0040970915,0.0018622031,0.0034499809,0.0046263617,0.0011741073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021150628,0.00022548722,0.07423564,0.00056002097,0.00006393966,0.0027069058,0.37315962,0.00041657884,0.0041731154,0.35452205,0.031273626,0.15845159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045706372,0.00047397026,0.17104398,0.0009200214,0.000068755406,0.0016025653,0.12245074,0.00028322157,0.0043034363,0.006614458,0.692007,0.00018617821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09210261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21336645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09210261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004063517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011568532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18313307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340512580","doi":"10.7202/1035212ar","title":"Le parcours tumultueux des propos injurieux en droit québécois depuis 2009 : l’arrêt Génex Communications inc. c. Association québécoise de l’industrie du disque, du spectacle et de la vidéo (ADISQ) est-il toujours pertinent ?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.010520626253903992,"score_gpt":0.2711744292725134,"score_spread":0.2606538030186094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340512580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7109007,0.00744918,0.0010244523,0.06388269,0.00095816434,0.00008555518,0.00047410617,0.000021993728,0.21520315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8639481,0.002237292,0.00030179962,0.0053847693,0.000065066364,0.000030507683,0.00010161831,0.000021734597,0.12790906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980769,0.00029240196,0.00003748875,0.00020906335,0.00054886163,0.0008352647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746335,0.00039691388,0.00027930507,0.0000710541,0.0010527261,0.00073673244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013204846,0.0003167632,0.000313959,0.00077609805,0.019612141,0.006051949,0.001123831,0.0024694274,0.010162657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027105284,0.0002636377,0.00024364927,0.0010416037,0.0070261066,0.0016289637,0.0019384272,0.004383358,0.0006276225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016336281,0.000100966485,0.06927716,0.00031385123,0.00007459279,0.0040135738,0.60894805,0.00065314444,0.0022553564,0.1583163,0.091940336,0.06394323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009576145,0.000050891347,0.114654616,0.0005854096,0.00003514922,0.00036731127,0.46036005,0.00031092364,0.0007257424,0.0022659746,0.42053804,0.00009624418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061774418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061774418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05795469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44820684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340524384","doi":"10.7202/1035667ar","title":"Les sûretés en questions : Les tendances jurisprudentielles récentes","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.03183956810808285,"score_gpt":0.31541612146937437,"score_spread":0.2835765533612915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340524384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016753422,0.24098602,0.011075773,0.55560267,0.016335458,0.000043408916,0.00016440231,0.00007499344,0.15896386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47249013,0.1537238,0.010039226,0.19038682,0.039193615,0.00025982357,0.00025562735,0.0003558656,0.13329512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98329306,0.0077077006,0.00083506905,0.0022819801,0.004845641,0.0010365422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594066,0.033264723,0.0017786155,0.0016475456,0.0031440554,0.00075850036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013892943,0.00060023513,0.0011032725,0.0033328815,0.0077839126,0.017264698,0.0023854475,0.011645192,0.007431091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030284679,0.00042292755,0.0009477753,0.0039578504,0.034188915,0.017131448,0.0070443405,0.017020624,0.0012072443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023737597,0.000016745264,0.00026158153,0.0003919205,0.0000132621035,0.00018805935,0.017721256,0.00010214735,0.00018563967,0.9335112,0.030455222,0.017129323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008640524,0.000027385493,0.0008686463,0.0009540208,0.000010013162,0.00041820086,0.009223005,0.00012575625,0.00028229714,0.12768051,0.8603693,0.00003228585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005406534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011762573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017264698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007420624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006270645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07347381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341321733","doi":"","title":"The Origins, Evolution and Puzzling Irrelevance of Jury Recommendations in Second-Degree Murder Sentencing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Jurisprudence; Verdict; Political science; Law; Hung jury; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Jury instructions; Reasonable doubt; Power (physics); Criminal code; Criminal justice; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.048474277384341256,"score_gpt":0.33244473106061995,"score_spread":0.2839704536762787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341321733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85599595,0.0041034836,0.008513772,0.030776497,0.00019431465,0.00012292694,0.00021077898,0.00014417438,0.09993814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942007,0.00077907235,0.0017319103,0.0007432358,0.000042412787,0.0000115235325,0.000034970082,0.00004686481,0.0024093706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98814875,0.0039522382,0.00046674718,0.0018686177,0.0041805366,0.0013831834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.944455,0.029787622,0.0077100554,0.0050209155,0.01029133,0.0027350779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024774997,0.00019548691,0.0004054812,0.0035885472,0.006833932,0.007398127,0.0028199246,0.003770972,0.0026106443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100256085,0.00084302906,0.0002394016,0.0029222062,0.018654047,0.0033685125,0.0027407727,0.004470947,0.00034709688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026657173,0.00018009593,0.117312886,0.00021345934,0.00008052137,0.0011483902,0.20943841,0.0029395844,0.0024177134,0.41582128,0.00794647,0.24223463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006957499,0.00017356407,0.7142941,0.0008747131,0.00010012171,0.001036919,0.057424042,0.006045031,0.0040056836,0.08841568,0.12717171,0.00038889225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6099729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66561323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6099729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027134411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023165913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7846481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341543272","doi":"10.7202/1035885ar","title":"Le droit d’être entendu et l’évocation","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.026870498053830273,"score_gpt":0.28610250694236244,"score_spread":0.25923200888853215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341543272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10378311,0.0025905399,0.015673134,0.01479872,0.0008613342,0.000113834816,0.00011446841,0.00009251997,0.86197245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8107,0.0015490358,0.0030389405,0.002416617,0.00033226202,0.00014385663,0.00005929714,0.00011479701,0.18164523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089104,0.003714096,0.00030365793,0.00088303327,0.0027989196,0.0014091621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936108,0.002826669,0.00095249666,0.0007605399,0.0012267153,0.00062283047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038675587,0.00042402823,0.0002640107,0.0010300659,0.0075145666,0.012369755,0.0014650292,0.003923362,0.022330334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011257764,0.00044525723,0.0004357886,0.0011482243,0.009579415,0.0078047444,0.006030217,0.0045333076,0.0040152655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012629281,0.000083913525,0.004615403,0.0002363246,0.000013034522,0.00093544263,0.10134434,0.00040302242,0.0020375291,0.8153768,0.01385792,0.06096998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022063703,0.0001650872,0.014137743,0.0008199737,0.00003620979,0.0011849223,0.096429884,0.0005130295,0.0029619173,0.05241093,0.8312269,0.000091324786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014728005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027860641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022330334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062063164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067119333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07470244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341790205","doi":"","title":"Nothing Plus Nothing Equals... Something? A Proposal for FLIR Warrants on Reasonable Suspicion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Nothing; Prima facie; Probable cause; Law; Order (exchange); Reasonable suspicion; Jurisprudence; Reasonable doubt; Section (typography); Expectation of privacy; Political science; Supreme court; Business; Philosophy; Advertising","score_opus":0.042710408069387015,"score_gpt":0.3357256185661975,"score_spread":0.29301521049681045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341790205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010104834,0.0045293355,0.05496229,0.41785938,0.0023470917,0.00035266744,0.00013796255,0.00024905856,0.5094573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7241481,0.0027979042,0.044563916,0.12025781,0.0077211927,0.0010871645,0.00009872964,0.00020626873,0.099118896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765504,0.011111643,0.0011489495,0.003150927,0.0054685525,0.0025694894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97659236,0.015225631,0.0011241633,0.0027414095,0.0030997891,0.0012167112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03255123,0.0011324115,0.0013794374,0.0035597596,0.008931896,0.016258955,0.0050158356,0.030629663,0.011867304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06377405,0.001055123,0.0022950887,0.0017978727,0.039898004,0.027291335,0.0077186474,0.022663137,0.0028713592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010222883,0.000006901888,0.00004791769,0.000012635693,0.0000022875013,0.000052015996,0.00022978237,0.000057668505,0.000025666499,0.9933703,0.0040229135,0.0021617257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004518438,0.000035268185,0.00010972107,0.00013720262,0.00001807757,0.00010641642,0.00032138487,0.0007051632,0.00011949211,0.946399,0.05196686,0.000036247337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006484124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008186736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03255123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012979107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009149737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17214942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341940334","doi":"","title":"The Rise and Fall of Duress (or How Duress Changed Necessity Before Being Excluded by Self-Defence)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Supreme court; Law; Self defense; Principal (computer security); Statutory law; Action (physics); Political science; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.017670128510339046,"score_gpt":0.2742180158787014,"score_spread":0.25654788736836237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341940334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27828908,0.012142869,0.011542918,0.052175403,0.0008051956,0.00006903085,0.0003002882,0.000055584824,0.6446196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977817,0.0014754396,0.0009841302,0.0045277113,0.00010818213,0.000016123893,0.00003979407,0.0000142435565,0.015017418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968298,0.0009126401,0.0001333216,0.00046951298,0.0008923162,0.0007623692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996855,0.0014375184,0.0005709182,0.00041023613,0.00048847194,0.00023783506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029035416,0.00015719236,0.00028349928,0.0007902002,0.0039550317,0.0054775155,0.0007565409,0.002440129,0.0020806082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008176564,0.00019939576,0.00037463827,0.0005093548,0.027190413,0.0054750512,0.002534,0.00567455,0.00016305919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013090404,0.000005052786,0.002148382,0.000034487603,0.0000056015083,0.000115348535,0.0061412533,0.00006262706,0.00028317305,0.9821364,0.0016424395,0.007412161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024859406,0.0001465253,0.07286629,0.0011549017,0.000087250446,0.0014175193,0.02366956,0.00052086014,0.0037151475,0.44717908,0.44901857,0.00019948526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15938284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2554947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15938284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008975621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006252126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3169102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343070288","doi":"","title":"Protecting Reasonable Expectations: Mapping the Trajectory of the Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Legislature; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Honesty; Incentive; Political science; Law; Legal doctrine; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08579485785569538,"score_gpt":0.3044174413324854,"score_spread":0.21862258347679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343070288","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063401006,0.009599116,0.4117197,0.13176072,0.00045961974,0.00032587335,0.0005469025,0.0003881553,0.38179895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9306189,0.005797229,0.054364573,0.0019308822,0.0001573193,0.00021870177,0.00022026409,0.00020505238,0.0064870766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872018,0.008076141,0.0005169413,0.0011064124,0.0022127898,0.0008859186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95780253,0.029986484,0.00345046,0.0033173764,0.0040594637,0.001383648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018889524,0.0006802178,0.0007683354,0.004565832,0.0045492654,0.016276881,0.002490982,0.005085583,0.010214318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08162845,0.00061048585,0.00080669025,0.0034275136,0.031362884,0.03886845,0.0076858033,0.008838035,0.0013304105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001133862,0.000012815924,0.00067381834,0.000032780365,0.000004597389,0.00006124009,0.002345384,0.0008828107,0.00003772281,0.98626965,0.0006892125,0.008978656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030967346,0.000009320799,0.0004299452,0.00011719808,0.000002543387,0.000033022985,0.0020042819,0.0014950639,0.00008338398,0.9844245,0.011386831,0.000010996619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01075834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071041705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018889524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014258431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013501148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10345262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344462979","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1351","title":"Book Review: Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy, by David R. Boyd","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Environmental law","score_opus":0.01375388791006874,"score_gpt":0.28442814922294446,"score_spread":0.2706742613128757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344462979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018039391,0.6133745,0.000489817,0.27287498,0.08119301,0.000041772048,0.00054380426,0.00006572938,0.03123605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005038417,0.6463715,0.0011242228,0.12051284,0.07108977,0.000086618355,0.0006384076,0.00021729001,0.15492094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982066,0.00020303296,0.00007189839,0.00013154364,0.0012685338,0.00011840109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987182,0.0045481464,0.00041831195,0.00019771965,0.006954859,0.00069885014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023439205,0.001049826,0.0012380483,0.0050263503,0.002934995,0.0051300502,0.002424929,0.0039732135,0.020744253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013458275,0.0005839738,0.0005252854,0.008541718,0.0036052093,0.0040796916,0.0011580394,0.0055793775,0.006078113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019171728,0.000001018766,0.000021024493,0.00010300804,0.000001959144,0.0000048731636,0.000018080704,0.000021036163,0.000008027419,0.0012026969,0.9919858,0.0066304207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004121543,0.00000273458,0.0002573925,0.0005616846,0.0000069130233,0.000029666591,0.000068529385,0.000028430077,0.000022101347,0.0016625604,0.99734616,0.000009712706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4239564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7462133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5760436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015450303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027011571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8429774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344548867","doi":"","title":"John Gardner's Transatlantic Shadow","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Shadow (psychology); Criminal law; Law; Criminal responsibility; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.02783539033050048,"score_gpt":0.30017488881613313,"score_spread":0.27233949848563266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344548867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016037766,0.2823042,0.0024634055,0.66159743,0.010269677,0.000009170545,0.000040029674,0.000028664175,0.041683685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15410063,0.31156802,0.0065735593,0.42137802,0.021040346,0.00011048997,0.00005483867,0.00026524218,0.08490886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937662,0.003001393,0.00022283483,0.0009029847,0.0018010865,0.00030551205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843009,0.012304188,0.00048396474,0.00043827083,0.0018185363,0.00065410766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007389435,0.00077597675,0.0009825263,0.003794542,0.0046503865,0.009980823,0.0018628822,0.0073306332,0.003958516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017657211,0.00040483198,0.00047987,0.00275663,0.022034124,0.0114594,0.003131744,0.010345216,0.00090871606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022341797,0.000011931989,0.00024229405,0.00029309333,0.000018019153,0.00013362589,0.008537613,0.00012818155,0.00013708438,0.75762266,0.20624533,0.026607772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007333171,0.000009024574,0.00015879405,0.0007621852,0.000007183308,0.00012831113,0.0031482,0.000099380726,0.00014551748,0.12375495,0.8717577,0.000021399386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050659724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06505325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050659724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106764585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01029737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100729704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345743899","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06726659079461812,"score_gpt":0.3286751651652943,"score_spread":0.2614085743706762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345743899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54380727,0.025215156,0.00055488036,0.03780267,0.0002855732,0.00010947535,0.0008067535,0.000013275828,0.39140502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809542,0.004266869,0.00010618907,0.0025683672,0.000033955934,0.00002665781,0.00014455864,0.0000068805634,0.011892466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503076,0.0012700695,0.00012633894,0.00019509342,0.0013276257,0.002050101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920026,0.0035663182,0.0008629062,0.00013212193,0.0022052415,0.0012308655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038271786,0.00014858098,0.0005495161,0.0031258767,0.008964295,0.004424318,0.0013137608,0.0022235676,0.014490704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022167483,0.00029045864,0.0004285086,0.007958606,0.0037040156,0.003278106,0.0022327418,0.003822791,0.00049810385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008437801,0.00061188464,0.15544559,0.001020009,0.00035597518,0.002374291,0.084410064,0.00373096,0.0004634537,0.49540928,0.11176046,0.14357424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009937908,0.00016139618,0.64637125,0.0012181981,0.00020980145,0.00027793358,0.19824108,0.0014715197,0.0002842658,0.01762571,0.13395245,0.000087078835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90400267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09599733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033025965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031867694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23962128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346317093","doi":"","title":"Rational Connections: Oakes, Section 1 and the Charter's Legal Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Deference; Scholarship; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011115316061070753,"score_gpt":0.269419501294481,"score_spread":0.25830418523341026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346317093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0350757,0.020249687,0.008003468,0.32632506,0.0019061223,0.000040525418,0.00016529395,0.000054196636,0.60818005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8901728,0.0074007404,0.0034583171,0.04251798,0.002878264,0.00008173686,0.00010973646,0.00007404577,0.05330635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122226,0.0036340514,0.00019914458,0.0011427903,0.0026263895,0.0011753538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890125,0.007992225,0.0008249314,0.0005993616,0.0010928889,0.0004780579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009778334,0.00031719837,0.00050907035,0.0014975871,0.0065980307,0.012676617,0.0012538885,0.0075731864,0.0044855475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026556509,0.0003633065,0.00036017556,0.001439265,0.034118537,0.011790426,0.0035776976,0.010707679,0.00040783078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032493822,0.0000026859623,0.00007735387,0.000004228099,6.0703525e-7,0.000015828682,0.00062974857,0.000027498116,0.0000052573046,0.992293,0.0054996572,0.0014407027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011989029,0.000010747338,0.0007748108,0.0001333767,0.000003881892,0.00004891834,0.0009937943,0.00018989547,0.00006765483,0.90806127,0.08968582,0.000017914253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057042662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062489733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99059933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009400659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013971225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11342126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2349069524","doi":"","title":"Study on Several Issues of Administrative Violations of Law and Administrative Crime——A Comparative Study Between China and Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Forum of Nandu","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; China; Legislation; Administrative law; Harm; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Action (physics); Public administration","score_opus":0.21274400938976476,"score_gpt":0.4472309657058028,"score_spread":0.23448695631603803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2349069524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936301,0.00065916975,0.000028533614,0.0006148211,0.000008331049,0.000019213994,0.00015416082,0.0000017431215,0.0048840665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978046,0.00055164914,0.00006768211,0.00011917796,0.000004694656,0.000008435197,0.00013449315,0.000002248145,0.0013070159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985669,0.00017214403,0.00007551434,0.00018294169,0.0004667211,0.0005358355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959162,0.00061123434,0.0006994662,0.0000952064,0.0018313744,0.0008464269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012555203,0.00024028179,0.0004687651,0.0038353954,0.011004128,0.002898736,0.001166863,0.0005889264,0.0035885829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040908526,0.0002614918,0.00041832885,0.008069465,0.002696802,0.0010840414,0.0016471212,0.001088682,0.00012843637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016340478,0.0002101884,0.88537335,0.00022863176,0.00012214363,0.0014937184,0.069408394,0.00024345383,0.00054532243,0.010900834,0.0034458833,0.027864596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008729574,0.000038672893,0.9209939,0.00008677502,0.000035288045,0.00017736103,0.07184212,0.00027510588,0.00011243132,0.00017648416,0.0062198746,0.000033267042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052770246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052770246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058974396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3828767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2350166895","doi":"","title":"The Development of Plea Bargaining in Other Countries and Its Teachings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dangdai faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Phenomenon; Value (mathematics); Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03919997824790123,"score_gpt":0.3484357302492413,"score_spread":0.30923575200134007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2350166895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011645512,0.027758656,0.037465777,0.023941047,0.0013102326,0.00007895951,0.00006883917,0.00010834767,0.89762247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72213256,0.042833924,0.029363424,0.01573116,0.0031072127,0.00040314897,0.00021016305,0.0002758379,0.18594252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885262,0.006970645,0.0005334863,0.0015569178,0.0015132369,0.0008995024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871315,0.00854295,0.00082796806,0.0011033623,0.0016378844,0.0007562924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016915746,0.00054033287,0.00069839874,0.004216513,0.0075234873,0.013511917,0.0020659608,0.005117974,0.014503102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018107126,0.0006832741,0.00089569966,0.0066818125,0.015913894,0.00911694,0.004879199,0.013154397,0.003704818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008961731,0.000025388676,0.0001460275,0.00005440053,0.0000025115717,0.000056356956,0.000917862,0.0003417712,0.000043817483,0.9784219,0.0032800245,0.01670093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019992636,0.000064698725,0.0015672308,0.0008504552,0.00000654375,0.0003091025,0.0022746583,0.0019751973,0.0009030358,0.4111286,0.5808336,0.00006679139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049972176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029596146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016915746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015076571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008302651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10938871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2354175897","doi":"","title":"The Development and the Problems of Sino-Canadian Criminal Judicial Assistance System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Minjiang University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Affection; Criminal procedure; Psychology","score_opus":0.02979729047327221,"score_gpt":0.24296156598229457,"score_spread":0.21316427550902237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2354175897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39519316,0.020266727,0.002018012,0.22353064,0.00077474775,0.00033265568,0.0013285801,0.000079011224,0.35647643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704921,0.0065844115,0.0011764362,0.004243734,0.000070952214,0.000039102004,0.00017092415,0.00001532168,0.017207008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905529,0.0010216587,0.00023040663,0.00053941517,0.0038884159,0.0037673286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910034,0.0006984095,0.00060455914,0.00021341603,0.0053158295,0.0021644626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004082077,0.00027615,0.0003272643,0.0032620837,0.019601613,0.007764433,0.0022903145,0.0016006845,0.0057461886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01026995,0.00032693814,0.0003624952,0.003769206,0.005837702,0.0024374872,0.0027286964,0.003111655,0.00025340414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082051665,0.00008723083,0.06763135,0.00028876308,0.000050818737,0.0018963823,0.017640067,0.000909333,0.00045570938,0.7578748,0.062155854,0.09092767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056524455,0.000055930166,0.23282446,0.0011169424,0.00015005963,0.001012762,0.07060429,0.00419939,0.001120218,0.04001623,0.64859414,0.00024908097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12860365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12860365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25519246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9330892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359822578","doi":"","title":"Comparison on application of tempering justice with mercy in arrest censorship between countries(regions) of Anglo-American law system and our country","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Tempering","score_opus":0.035783856486190785,"score_gpt":0.3096061267926808,"score_spread":0.27382227030649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359822578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788442,0.00069939357,0.0017259608,0.0003076991,0.000026134998,0.000027984344,0.000075208634,0.00000487693,0.018288532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919146,0.000112516114,0.00030665164,0.000027180566,0.0000043170016,0.000008411204,0.00003605451,0.0000015138646,0.00031190398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966708,0.0017895036,0.00023365617,0.00034128205,0.0004806897,0.0004840134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954085,0.0013205813,0.0010291556,0.00040282944,0.0015420103,0.00029688678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025618295,0.00011686395,0.00023499932,0.0026367365,0.0015083575,0.0014125198,0.00039323655,0.000268024,0.0014805899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011544457,0.00008290662,0.00043090116,0.0025259554,0.0013275386,0.0013570738,0.0017626531,0.0005756097,0.000069440735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017610894,0.00007231675,0.875664,0.00012767958,0.00023336364,0.00060172385,0.027996982,0.00091860595,0.0007150508,0.02963437,0.0009697916,0.06288997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004435771,0.00009536647,0.9665688,0.00007805476,0.00012985397,0.00021245771,0.02621702,0.0010674087,0.00048559197,0.0017045689,0.0034194367,0.000017025095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019314855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033445172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019314855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001683102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011026054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038404882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2360878871","doi":"","title":"Legal Application of Evidences for \"Drug Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Commit; Engineering ethics; Drug; Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.06359993828934064,"score_gpt":0.38918085595921015,"score_spread":0.3255809176698695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2360878871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073802106,0.01888352,0.23118727,0.06843937,0.002770427,0.0023640378,0.0028243777,0.0007113339,0.59901756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8499055,0.00660561,0.10710062,0.008513006,0.001359512,0.0011194303,0.0008704133,0.000053176227,0.024472816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599693,0.016316842,0.0058997488,0.003610529,0.012835771,0.0013679501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89629817,0.06483446,0.011847845,0.013039492,0.012606158,0.0013738557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02802453,0.0006161524,0.00095324515,0.007983126,0.004293709,0.007853585,0.0031219295,0.012689808,0.0051123444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10824469,0.0007253876,0.0014199398,0.0026454283,0.013908814,0.009310242,0.0042997533,0.0068908157,0.0010931795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047937905,0.000041462987,0.0028712412,0.0005875954,0.000043053915,0.0012879968,0.0017044798,0.00033441884,0.0004893627,0.95704496,0.0071863085,0.028361304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009701067,0.0002100142,0.0076931845,0.0035366057,0.00026167018,0.0032847298,0.0026227464,0.0037622747,0.0064965775,0.71456814,0.25731662,0.00015048595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002658469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032321818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02802453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002735477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070462786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14820963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361027757","doi":"","title":"The Research of In - Custody Informers in Prevention of Miscarriages of Justice of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; False accusation; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0457054966009129,"score_gpt":0.39726469932327657,"score_spread":0.3515592027223637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361027757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9455853,0.009630644,0.00041117027,0.026017409,0.00018595267,0.0003436375,0.00033161187,0.000014924094,0.017479332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870919,0.0076197726,0.0007964918,0.001458215,0.000022348273,0.00005975491,0.000095847725,0.000006519311,0.0028491209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893027,0.0045200516,0.0004463203,0.0004550017,0.0032098643,0.0020662542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303792,0.020193446,0.0072380984,0.0011121302,0.03155482,0.009522271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013065379,0.00029421342,0.0006313442,0.002565252,0.0109095285,0.0035734584,0.0023956776,0.00092400564,0.0025300642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08983931,0.00046859734,0.00032193644,0.00325302,0.0022754883,0.0014290512,0.0022804618,0.002802555,0.00013726587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006038301,0.0011014632,0.66004914,0.0015646665,0.00022605094,0.0008353949,0.11511449,0.0002744757,0.00036739398,0.007341145,0.012383227,0.20013879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011884054,0.0005348414,0.80460954,0.0032890048,0.00055268547,0.0003696744,0.15218352,0.001043185,0.0018148969,0.0010308434,0.034340627,0.00011222555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98478264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07448935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07448935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22796275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5404606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361061843","doi":"","title":"On the Emergency Monitoring from the Perspective of Discretionary Power","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Beifang faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Legislation; Statutory law; Perspective (graphical); Law; Control (management); Business; Power (physics); Criminal law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0418418218616751,"score_gpt":0.35529399488322877,"score_spread":0.31345217302155365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361061843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11317972,0.023645634,0.12926546,0.11954726,0.0010957783,0.00023838924,0.00034117055,0.00007195914,0.6126146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726054,0.004962264,0.008364806,0.002771005,0.00073885603,0.00008271398,0.00003907318,0.00001656926,0.010419252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582124,0.002014256,0.00018163817,0.00054878334,0.0010069115,0.00042714065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945767,0.003244289,0.0006684177,0.0004302366,0.0008295322,0.00025070412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040018973,0.00033837356,0.00037175012,0.0033358384,0.001738736,0.004150134,0.0008047409,0.0020533956,0.0060145725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076973075,0.00020954416,0.0003933841,0.001196138,0.011902471,0.006909222,0.0020568203,0.002632321,0.00031415658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013898152,0.00001874633,0.0012393848,0.00005536748,0.000008781772,0.00028456183,0.0007499919,0.00063990976,0.00021621211,0.97951365,0.0022241436,0.015035264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018134187,0.00006125759,0.005590234,0.0002568805,0.000023771194,0.00043423809,0.0012963578,0.004275658,0.00042361626,0.95618856,0.03139484,0.000036427147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003066564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026662026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060145725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031370404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025917569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022760928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361486098","doi":"","title":"On Sino-Canadian Criminal Judicial Assistance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Minjiang University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Multinational corporation; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.036447800006605593,"score_gpt":0.2846593504511692,"score_spread":0.2482115504445636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361486098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08756571,0.021643404,0.0010514278,0.14095992,0.002727438,0.00026813467,0.0015782883,0.00005405372,0.7441516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7293222,0.023337418,0.0015297462,0.052493155,0.0007886886,0.000104400446,0.00052346656,0.000053251733,0.19184765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890358,0.0011845608,0.0004075102,0.0007317196,0.0044030813,0.0042373734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98681927,0.0015511073,0.0006858622,0.00040845503,0.008529475,0.0020058907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054439465,0.0005422028,0.00038606563,0.0030402464,0.021254702,0.0053455248,0.0021795698,0.0037541667,0.016262366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015343915,0.0004136543,0.00045390986,0.0042505064,0.0055424613,0.0017034174,0.0031525523,0.0046440405,0.0011862935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010431178,0.00009863823,0.02758135,0.00037365817,0.00004935132,0.0026144984,0.012210595,0.00039918552,0.00050224556,0.48110878,0.38649678,0.08846056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028180735,0.00002810714,0.044519752,0.00083808013,0.000068911344,0.00072192546,0.011034804,0.0003897182,0.0005056129,0.006874525,0.9348851,0.00010526201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9729804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05400961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05400961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1473167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39186895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236336940","doi":"","title":"Issue Estoppel and Similar Facts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Acquittal; Rules of evidence; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07970209412214053,"score_gpt":0.3947720567397317,"score_spread":0.3150699626175912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W236336940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028612113,0.005322903,0.000587816,0.0726318,0.027702112,0.000051438157,0.001870286,0.00019391779,0.8887786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029505476,0.002765963,0.00033224712,0.06951598,0.010522313,0.000052774503,0.00095816934,0.00021935526,0.8861277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986759,0.00020968795,0.00008855171,0.00021992889,0.00051454623,0.0002913498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770904,0.0009756063,0.00014232245,0.00046552697,0.0005841077,0.00012336789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011148958,0.00042446138,0.00044661603,0.002147647,0.00502267,0.00614702,0.0011230438,0.006030292,0.12582175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009168587,0.00025442237,0.00070714887,0.0020516347,0.0016972471,0.0047952966,0.0023732765,0.006050286,0.04414739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033379623,0.000015399419,0.00018913297,0.000058119236,0.000005681237,0.00047106744,0.0006344433,0.000014742977,0.000099141645,0.070641495,0.9173654,0.01047207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003038753,0.0000030403764,0.00035561132,0.00005073,0.0000030550193,0.00020296547,0.00017182535,0.000013238723,0.00008369189,0.0021802082,0.9969284,0.0000042774973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007998101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013673533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12582175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017014464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012058285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42091572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364787803","doi":"","title":"Comparative Research Upon the Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence Between Canada and Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebei University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Exclusionary rule; Empirical evidence; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.18211674404804468,"score_gpt":0.39598480996829716,"score_spread":0.21386806592025248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2364787803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8121719,0.008111364,0.0012433145,0.0077138133,0.00009541107,0.00008021854,0.0001854168,0.000007793551,0.17039087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99470407,0.0019931972,0.00048515017,0.00047909166,0.000009677557,0.00001885841,0.000055300075,0.0000052909977,0.0022492574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751404,0.0069037164,0.0014571259,0.0015064161,0.010527232,0.0044650836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90860474,0.043488193,0.008511732,0.0032198685,0.03083708,0.005338442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01601806,0.0001779242,0.000910282,0.0076181204,0.018463653,0.007081657,0.0016991528,0.0013204513,0.005054859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07976289,0.000429016,0.00053722004,0.011002364,0.012902272,0.0031696376,0.0045236815,0.0034018976,0.00015722532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058581267,0.00018073345,0.19090953,0.0010382461,0.000442085,0.0020769327,0.20111828,0.0015869152,0.0020338178,0.4845846,0.007086357,0.1083567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076324584,0.0002301853,0.7689961,0.0021115993,0.000347063,0.00096698094,0.13233776,0.0011579385,0.0015040273,0.016268324,0.075799786,0.00020390488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96216744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06755168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06755168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07901813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49012405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2366159395","doi":"","title":"Rules of Hearsay Evidence in Canadian Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebei Polytechnic College","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.048778789317707946,"score_gpt":0.35690962962606,"score_spread":0.308130840308352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2366159395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03007415,0.0048538432,0.1272444,0.023088904,0.0012319185,0.0006844396,0.002185485,0.0005032333,0.81013364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76565725,0.0048841815,0.12629467,0.008174364,0.0007209731,0.00039481118,0.0012558135,0.00018827018,0.092429735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97165394,0.00250494,0.0026330817,0.0030847685,0.017234845,0.0028884897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97609997,0.00512919,0.00091687124,0.0017576718,0.015035067,0.0010612463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013063339,0.0006193358,0.0009751841,0.0052794856,0.012188637,0.011720036,0.003499813,0.0045891213,0.0054909433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041760754,0.0008695882,0.0013469793,0.004575395,0.016833475,0.0050203064,0.0037065076,0.0067826333,0.0010566904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005661424,0.0000034448449,0.00044980054,0.00004074951,0.00000888524,0.000121451536,0.0005210788,0.00038658772,0.000081317536,0.98540175,0.005551925,0.007427363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000268599,0.000010518929,0.0029332435,0.00026685093,0.00006763638,0.00032322857,0.0005886707,0.0037431237,0.00066304044,0.8286747,0.16257639,0.00012591173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81393635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80908394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18606365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029334566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071803905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37431878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372037830","doi":"","title":"Protection of Credit Rating Agencies under the First Amendment:From the Perspective of Judicial Precedents","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credit rating; Agency (philosophy); Malice; Business; Liability; Consumer Protection Act; Credit reference; Law; Economics; Actuarial science; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Credit risk; Sociology","score_opus":0.18244977531919718,"score_gpt":0.4357700157728696,"score_spread":0.2533202404536724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372037830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047802206,0.008895316,0.050312337,0.12955816,0.0014097922,0.0004271144,0.0006572948,0.00023988645,0.7606979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89089483,0.0031942327,0.015860016,0.038104746,0.0027295493,0.0006963501,0.0002777722,0.0000849544,0.048157595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9547539,0.016828274,0.003011529,0.007968453,0.009810399,0.0076273363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92642397,0.041027483,0.006780389,0.011003291,0.012248111,0.0025167384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04569902,0.0009915989,0.0017503992,0.003178263,0.013162088,0.023153057,0.005250088,0.03037901,0.0074913474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08804316,0.0015132236,0.0026383458,0.002523759,0.026234275,0.015210497,0.006356128,0.028971178,0.0021707779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001448841,0.000021686963,0.0003218322,0.000025560455,0.00000975169,0.00018162878,0.00080728444,0.00018565815,0.00011561599,0.99233043,0.0036376233,0.0023484067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017095105,0.00014044052,0.0017153794,0.00060957967,0.00011500383,0.00045637102,0.0009480884,0.0023950438,0.0010924914,0.8974867,0.09470973,0.00016014783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022885974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017410275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04569902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088391965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022706114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24168241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2375055342","doi":"","title":"On Construction of Antisuit Injunction in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Yangtze University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; China; Construct (python library); Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02073543483180496,"score_gpt":0.25350796572852535,"score_spread":0.2327725308967204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2375055342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80173033,0.0005679425,0.06042841,0.006255611,0.00014367494,0.00073301926,0.00012600038,0.0001453383,0.1298697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845598,0.00022206402,0.0075017586,0.00025570698,0.000025236603,0.00010789908,0.000051034112,0.00000918887,0.0072673173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565303,0.0010907981,0.00032926732,0.00056582544,0.0014088149,0.00095223245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00047110414,0.00019017853,0.00018739192,0.00047080545,0.0001426756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004315809,0.00038174455,0.0005235765,0.0022968932,0.004907685,0.0028303594,0.001382779,0.0018429416,0.003863369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004178597,0.00039908566,0.0010387265,0.001171453,0.0036304353,0.0020172785,0.0031778656,0.0017950141,0.00019443773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090678644,0.00013455322,0.014694473,0.000121892816,0.000055638455,0.0011663045,0.0020205248,0.010303178,0.0023074269,0.94211066,0.0024674116,0.024527183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042477224,0.00080698833,0.055416428,0.00040322024,0.00073213835,0.0010681432,0.004687252,0.25844556,0.010611603,0.60523385,0.061891265,0.00027874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06681377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04325434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06681377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006777723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01236835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13284975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2379713756","doi":"","title":"Plea Bargaining: the Choice from the Effectiveness of Lawsuit and the Justice of Lawsuit","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of North China Electric Power University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Lawsuit; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008868414887946425,"score_gpt":0.2439900598089934,"score_spread":0.23512164492104698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2379713756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21936794,0.010501347,0.10471171,0.038485877,0.0011325047,0.00060904404,0.00043628603,0.00009485882,0.62466055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843477,0.0008567044,0.00450115,0.0010750104,0.0003326364,0.00015908871,0.000057582958,0.000035875255,0.008634134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96363896,0.02239888,0.0021907995,0.0033454339,0.005925364,0.0025006104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8984468,0.080428235,0.008682304,0.002915535,0.0064780237,0.0030490663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038887363,0.00059914717,0.0010444367,0.0051693004,0.0041953474,0.012421568,0.0018889218,0.0043011783,0.011919491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11544438,0.00040993796,0.0010845425,0.003755915,0.015074477,0.018823871,0.0053325086,0.00574854,0.0009263195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020971248,0.00012409303,0.012708635,0.000113715505,0.00005262955,0.00029717255,0.0021200015,0.0011962665,0.00021277498,0.93953604,0.0035878483,0.039841082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050352915,0.00025075124,0.021479456,0.00040629043,0.00013848538,0.00042818757,0.007943623,0.009539772,0.0007208827,0.9388004,0.020125011,0.00011680516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023694783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024195944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038887363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007833532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034614624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2056585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2380701235","doi":"","title":"Basic Legal Principles of the Admissibility of Video Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Xiandai faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admissible evidence; Law; China; Video recording; Computer science; Political science; Multimedia","score_opus":0.09186361653498636,"score_gpt":0.36002540162873875,"score_spread":0.2681617850937524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2380701235","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025426373,0.0075997408,0.51582694,0.035689652,0.0013525172,0.0037556936,0.0020087957,0.00043677344,0.40790352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43217918,0.0055304123,0.5101596,0.011986355,0.0031000602,0.0056381184,0.0010150123,0.00017712716,0.030214071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93526447,0.014711528,0.013713267,0.009330278,0.023995055,0.00298531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9199658,0.042348605,0.0056000464,0.0117080705,0.018657379,0.0017201183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04860894,0.0012367965,0.0020796133,0.007129657,0.008591153,0.01196683,0.0055901585,0.015020489,0.004974267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08234344,0.0019463957,0.0033494907,0.0033454292,0.028647639,0.0125400005,0.0064815017,0.014057526,0.003231423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020263238,0.000052989308,0.0005190477,0.00019187805,0.000030588555,0.00031478156,0.0008754642,0.00045948953,0.00045448597,0.9841092,0.003083924,0.00988786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008897195,0.00006899482,0.0009757247,0.00069927424,0.00007430596,0.0009213859,0.00030928061,0.0018244016,0.001500055,0.94842494,0.0450073,0.00010549048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047836844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033863138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04860894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046659973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012923618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25707173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2380827553","doi":"","title":"Quarter Division of Acts Reflection of the Mode of the Constitution of Crime in China","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dangdai faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; China; Perspective (graphical); Law; Position (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Division (mathematics); Reflection (computer programming); Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Law and economics; Criminology; History; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.02588039589658718,"score_gpt":0.3551836976815033,"score_spread":0.3293033017849161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2380827553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7134389,0.0057835304,0.014382951,0.008618481,0.00032328587,0.00023548724,0.0002875271,0.00006346546,0.2568663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98894274,0.0015197039,0.0021376656,0.0001760615,0.00002605145,0.000026215566,0.00009278691,0.000005757653,0.007073055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833363,0.00045654172,0.00016659539,0.00021592813,0.0006113691,0.00021596209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863344,0.00040847977,0.00033587046,0.00012510148,0.00039544085,0.000101598205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020703727,0.00021793327,0.00023083859,0.002870424,0.0019635116,0.0019591285,0.00057647546,0.0003843441,0.003040722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024012383,0.00014625979,0.00026472428,0.0020930842,0.0047325,0.0017159275,0.0011534629,0.0008607448,0.00012817491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033773926,0.000027151158,0.047254838,0.00035321224,0.00003170634,0.0006337036,0.014863035,0.0011875215,0.0014016195,0.8632572,0.0031716607,0.06778452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029433822,0.00018042442,0.48526606,0.0007927512,0.00019073654,0.0012696073,0.026984733,0.011432303,0.005296886,0.26307872,0.20534655,0.00013183073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032775883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046678063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032775883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063347486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00853325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06517023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2384357643","doi":"","title":"Tipping the Scales in the Reasonableness-Proportionality Debate in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Administrative law; Political science","score_opus":0.04149552550877914,"score_gpt":0.34451116525193876,"score_spread":0.3030156397431596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2384357643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0473304,0.014680439,0.025039382,0.6934533,0.0025421295,0.00014678542,0.00025797353,0.00010631777,0.21644334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94200486,0.0025549848,0.009485518,0.036261506,0.0014001529,0.00011652124,0.000051789488,0.00012596209,0.00799887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87739253,0.060896464,0.005200158,0.0101242885,0.0360189,0.010367562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7422292,0.20006792,0.004587909,0.0076673417,0.039122835,0.006324739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1371675,0.00090022065,0.002906105,0.007322165,0.030088212,0.022069488,0.009273663,0.020020692,0.008460807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38559562,0.0014636159,0.0015803771,0.008891255,0.07087954,0.019506468,0.0075804614,0.02606042,0.0005125495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003302745,0.000011121126,0.00053427415,0.00006504058,0.000020888116,0.000043729688,0.002600181,0.00033676237,0.00002690839,0.9774239,0.009616931,0.009287244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090758294,0.000019322193,0.0040056435,0.0005337364,0.000085104606,0.000057657468,0.0032101807,0.0025318011,0.00014799327,0.94342756,0.045753233,0.00013693512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8756407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.882304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1371675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11304922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14029963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82023335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387574630","doi":"","title":"The Age Divide of Criminal Responsibility in Criminal Law --The Study of the 17th Clause of the Criminal Law of 97 Version","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Legislation; Criminal responsibility; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminal procedure; Geography","score_opus":0.09621401664060643,"score_gpt":0.3429144618812104,"score_spread":0.24670044524060397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387574630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51262414,0.01502308,0.010512064,0.024112148,0.00078801694,0.000045777197,0.00012768421,0.000017242497,0.43674985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922861,0.0015992003,0.0007678409,0.0008156886,0.00021962861,0.000024431236,0.000031265194,0.00001189587,0.0042439643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664813,0.0015405186,0.0001957153,0.00027752842,0.000890471,0.00044760515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883599,0.0072862552,0.0019767354,0.0004663481,0.0013090711,0.00060169765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036677052,0.00014606034,0.0002942903,0.0024004618,0.0029305024,0.005688838,0.00066239975,0.0010472154,0.003351392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014733992,0.00015600988,0.00025122103,0.0018877076,0.0132145565,0.008801253,0.003516424,0.0029639278,0.0003677846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019943238,0.000013389972,0.0074070073,0.000014718185,0.000002518849,0.00005404059,0.0072050616,0.00003727636,0.000046561203,0.9727094,0.0009923091,0.011497772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018849145,0.00023617956,0.08966895,0.0007151552,0.00003561642,0.0008752023,0.04574537,0.00076910236,0.0009910306,0.71262854,0.14825551,0.000060474966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00303044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032031334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005688838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002775865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021424224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02014041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2390171878","doi":"","title":"On the judicial applicability of the eliminating rules to the illegal evidence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; China; Kingdom; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.047435678838248375,"score_gpt":0.33656991075490467,"score_spread":0.28913423191665627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2390171878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11371557,0.0048217257,0.15880947,0.045844376,0.0014877173,0.0005871146,0.00036879233,0.00012889573,0.67423636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495919,0.002100451,0.021195684,0.006454508,0.0018917827,0.00036899582,0.00014994212,0.000050119867,0.018196676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.957395,0.018034128,0.003362928,0.0065041813,0.011083829,0.0036197924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8863842,0.0777278,0.006540431,0.012510078,0.0157458,0.0010915995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04605136,0.0004611533,0.0015183997,0.0032401923,0.0071567455,0.008530595,0.0038880298,0.008249067,0.00584445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121560186,0.0006608652,0.0021982181,0.0020650015,0.017158413,0.0066833575,0.00494402,0.009681347,0.0010239122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011940637,0.00001621916,0.00035050514,0.000029167773,0.000017401186,0.0001142044,0.00028216734,0.00063868356,0.00011273403,0.9929172,0.0011920863,0.0043176995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046425645,0.000029675286,0.00093203364,0.00009774683,0.0000519546,0.00013197918,0.00019752672,0.004187912,0.000441056,0.9821743,0.011686275,0.000023228911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009066207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007440882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04605136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003562411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007038886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24354583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392576107","doi":"","title":"Research on Canadian Sentencing System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Henan Police College","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggravating Factor; Legislation; Sentence; Political science; Law; Sentencing guidelines; Common law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.15006576821150128,"score_gpt":0.43651966890222793,"score_spread":0.2864539006907266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392576107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3463873,0.014893618,0.0029048137,0.022216149,0.0006355472,0.00046201257,0.008165185,0.00018443096,0.60415095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262911,0.013597565,0.0027215926,0.0023923486,0.00008272859,0.00017518786,0.0032724894,0.00011531989,0.05135164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99044436,0.0009121828,0.00040040715,0.0010770272,0.0053154184,0.0018506749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973695,0.0025520804,0.0011834663,0.0004714065,0.02040122,0.0016969235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005029526,0.00057217974,0.00077618647,0.010579424,0.01891651,0.00798979,0.0029549748,0.0012687921,0.032048073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031200431,0.00075243524,0.00075505406,0.019443147,0.0026436374,0.0037983146,0.0024818669,0.0026034925,0.0016143864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031534903,0.00016781955,0.15371996,0.0021123083,0.0002485565,0.0011004014,0.05349376,0.0029349003,0.00095811853,0.4677877,0.11301928,0.20414181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006650282,0.00008646942,0.51006466,0.001982578,0.00040966822,0.0004950726,0.046662234,0.002705162,0.0009671255,0.009108742,0.42719162,0.0002600777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20120507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20120507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2101579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9264889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392784077","doi":"","title":"Mens Rea for Animal Cruelty Offences after R. v. Gerling: A Dog's Breakfast","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Cruelty; Criminology; Animal welfare; Law; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.049269329107928285,"score_gpt":0.3615896948593452,"score_spread":0.3123203657514169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392784077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5726212,0.01755042,0.0017534224,0.1877105,0.006276248,0.0002060128,0.0020919729,0.00019889088,0.21159127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93358815,0.0032516816,0.00082180306,0.024883894,0.0005468779,0.0000533527,0.0004792858,0.0000449661,0.03632999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977083,0.0007064532,0.00020019665,0.00027847668,0.0004217634,0.000684778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453485,0.0026914827,0.0008425326,0.00050773047,0.0008430941,0.0005802422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047123916,0.00027583135,0.00030784225,0.0010173246,0.003598819,0.0014731935,0.0012176138,0.0066253464,0.009879016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02360725,0.00032290685,0.00051192474,0.000466247,0.0016677298,0.00163961,0.0017407152,0.005940165,0.0014214009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018384835,0.0005981481,0.14094543,0.0010864746,0.00034473653,0.019719105,0.025715537,0.000324206,0.0027427203,0.108432814,0.5001656,0.19808687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020008982,0.001511234,0.3520203,0.0036638577,0.0006457337,0.012871418,0.050168794,0.00087671954,0.0051198085,0.023340298,0.54930365,0.00027812974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034573205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10807162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034573205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018778426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032502445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068743944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396812244","doi":"","title":"Human rights issues and employee benefit plans.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statute; Human rights; Legislation; Legislature; Equity (law); Business; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058977305887395234,"score_gpt":0.3177346007931034,"score_spread":0.25875729490570815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396812244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024017977,0.0364952,0.000942135,0.1703199,0.0009853384,0.00014311276,0.0012297288,0.00001869666,0.76584786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7753289,0.031295337,0.0014367795,0.0749807,0.0010216995,0.00021018274,0.0011602828,0.000019016581,0.114547126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920912,0.001632578,0.00023502698,0.00043574328,0.0036668289,0.001938638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688823,0.006983001,0.0013060397,0.00039216052,0.003218061,0.0012125629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062327795,0.00024224324,0.00024318209,0.0029756776,0.008603866,0.0046834205,0.0014391684,0.0054337396,0.023845132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030135242,0.00021872808,0.00038310344,0.0036668063,0.008257864,0.0031780982,0.0026020354,0.004224908,0.0010579262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003404507,0.00006969771,0.0115430085,0.00028929577,0.000026344598,0.0004441966,0.0059624827,0.00014085167,0.000036429574,0.7781025,0.13887833,0.06447281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030622887,0.000046623085,0.05772142,0.0026055595,0.00007505939,0.00040087051,0.014740104,0.00020227749,0.00016216742,0.1644419,0.759536,0.000037473816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5935763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7352305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5935763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0148867145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04104661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8176344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399915542","doi":"","title":"Comparative Reflections on Duncan v. Louisiana and Baldwin v. New York","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plea; Political science; Mistake; Jury; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1459965362001065,"score_gpt":0.3795157850505571,"score_spread":0.2335192488504506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399915542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041614417,0.02666931,0.0006726336,0.23026948,0.00283607,0.000074469266,0.00061873085,0.00005372006,0.6971911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52522784,0.017825577,0.00092597667,0.22161509,0.0015177054,0.00030461416,0.0004969488,0.00017676334,0.2319095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889048,0.002172994,0.00028254086,0.0012482539,0.0030160276,0.00437544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934862,0.0032286409,0.00033370045,0.0001615054,0.0015208267,0.0012690786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057783974,0.0005434215,0.00078379724,0.0028477937,0.023216164,0.016468268,0.0034711526,0.012721085,0.014955421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013949558,0.0007882313,0.0010633204,0.003182042,0.017157376,0.006857381,0.0056335656,0.02289862,0.00089136965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009015727,0.00005413005,0.0022539415,0.00012401084,0.000029671852,0.00072332396,0.010556831,0.00018323331,0.0005597472,0.8681512,0.10304306,0.014230705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086882166,0.0001047975,0.0125992475,0.000780355,0.0000532986,0.00026409933,0.018824276,0.00019935436,0.00067075295,0.031951163,0.9342074,0.0002583131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89522755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9470594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89522755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083121546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05668866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60309184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402456381","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Law, Canadian: Articles - News","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3288104820208269,"score_gpt":0.4694332160104712,"score_spread":0.1406227339896443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402456381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004534443,0.010721518,0.000360391,0.014839019,0.0031417245,0.0003592007,0.044590738,0.0012001673,0.9243339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024350672,0.0068511227,0.00068993925,0.0017876107,0.0005413787,0.0001581365,0.008024843,0.0005108854,0.979001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952206,0.00027571947,0.00030062773,0.00029293922,0.0033742446,0.00053588446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632602,0.005151334,0.0009622839,0.0010564234,0.025779754,0.00379016],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037221243,0.0013104086,0.0012400841,0.021583147,0.0076672533,0.01654222,0.002341294,0.0044340217,0.49372256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0258458,0.0011067383,0.0007118976,0.02743951,0.002838883,0.0044663865,0.0021367976,0.0029559743,0.16349691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010203898,0.0000073732785,0.000088741865,0.00025400214,0.000001851814,0.000013714722,0.00009607415,0.000016891223,0.000025502824,0.003695392,0.97975326,0.016036958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060993307,0.0000027871133,0.0009123537,0.00043981906,0.000004858629,0.000009679277,0.0002771449,0.000025241803,0.00006990354,0.0007829568,0.9974602,0.00000896123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86026514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93555987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49372256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040112834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14198242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7221433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402674181","doi":"","title":"Best Practices in Administrative Decision-Making: Viewing the Copyright Board of Canada in a Comparative Light","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Tariff; Process (computing); Economic Justice; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Best practice; Administrative law; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08165649802691646,"score_gpt":0.4064513355718958,"score_spread":0.3247948375449793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402674181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080161616,0.03988667,0.00710496,0.21810865,0.002487842,0.00026671754,0.0005609195,0.00022830645,0.65119433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155346,0.020086054,0.0083298925,0.011956357,0.00036336077,0.00014040423,0.00030870864,0.00018039507,0.043100253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92191714,0.018705772,0.0018774697,0.0034150137,0.037004467,0.017080182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9216136,0.020836223,0.0033942924,0.003542632,0.04073221,0.009881045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036448404,0.0009613155,0.0010553685,0.010635604,0.053701337,0.056141656,0.0061551854,0.0061972793,0.0068252347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0660117,0.0008210584,0.0008584289,0.02375274,0.043216024,0.011594804,0.009709834,0.00805925,0.0005544162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071178125,0.00011700155,0.008599698,0.0005459231,0.000060504142,0.0008237275,0.13976987,0.0026108446,0.0003202049,0.66044265,0.07394007,0.11269838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030183783,0.000043827524,0.023975156,0.0016983084,0.0000667047,0.00014366324,0.21156885,0.0013259433,0.00048924267,0.034932785,0.72549117,0.00023407125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5870324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.41296762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.56567144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68087435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412098336","doi":"10.7202/1036483ar","title":"L’art de juger : sources et méthodologie. Ce que révèle l’œuvre du juge Louis LeBel","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03549583394563205,"score_gpt":0.2939813796759891,"score_spread":0.25848554573035704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412098336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04111967,0.040503107,0.12293912,0.04779495,0.002162378,0.0013542094,0.004716429,0.00085119426,0.738559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50272954,0.028377453,0.10214805,0.006697752,0.0010535723,0.0034545402,0.003197846,0.002088842,0.3502524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979723,0.0069568036,0.0003363117,0.000873066,0.0016631187,0.00037342866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873825,0.008996462,0.00049400434,0.0009985816,0.0018269998,0.0003014295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013378321,0.0010190513,0.0006594317,0.008241077,0.006619295,0.018098326,0.0017481919,0.0023301255,0.027363097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016058678,0.00062993896,0.0005494779,0.011524983,0.011848039,0.007233449,0.0058258143,0.0037653206,0.0051734387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006991671,0.000060096158,0.002095233,0.0008887047,0.0000273398,0.00033137176,0.11571057,0.0002654488,0.00035248362,0.6796339,0.039719395,0.1608455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001961721,0.00002296864,0.0018042423,0.0021360854,0.000018071602,0.00013992333,0.04570873,0.00028943142,0.0006141451,0.07529162,0.8739295,0.000025602703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022202693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029633602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130561665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012718545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413819913","doi":"","title":"Criminalization confusion and concerns: the decade since the Cuerrier decision.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Confusion; Supreme court; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.0635375325936003,"score_gpt":0.3279187207725473,"score_spread":0.264381188178947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413819913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059416797,0.42610815,0.00016331683,0.5442605,0.0041543464,0.0000102188815,0.00010409252,0.0000088684,0.019248812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1582385,0.330633,0.0005317375,0.48774913,0.01182934,0.000054320255,0.00027107028,0.000046174613,0.010646736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874133,0.0033553608,0.0009174183,0.002148578,0.0041327234,0.0020326541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94928193,0.030476667,0.005888252,0.0011591649,0.008609595,0.004584383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017603416,0.00058044784,0.00097621034,0.0043583494,0.011816822,0.02056191,0.0030531278,0.021555202,0.0043028165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06022014,0.00067834626,0.0006279303,0.0058604972,0.037871066,0.01840946,0.008103705,0.024424497,0.0006724432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009944811,0.00005362352,0.0035398954,0.0009492007,0.000054433956,0.0015472011,0.015696594,0.000092910894,0.000119573764,0.4016393,0.4057166,0.17049125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002033211,0.000033191336,0.0073320693,0.0037316761,0.00003611844,0.0012218215,0.01601168,0.00006208242,0.00013325244,0.03171117,0.9396437,0.00006284389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2022855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30936837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2022855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03231044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033712376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40221614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414053322","doi":"10.7202/1036487ar","title":"Spleen et idéal : les immunités juridictionnelles en droit canadien","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015804587456187985,"score_gpt":0.27048534295733123,"score_spread":0.2546807555011432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414053322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13095567,0.01427495,0.0042261523,0.21366248,0.000829128,0.00007086996,0.00051400886,0.00006394988,0.6354028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9260508,0.0035925652,0.0008779787,0.008713989,0.000161956,0.000033205033,0.00008693486,0.00002231156,0.060460333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965029,0.0006466714,0.000055862867,0.00026522134,0.0013176423,0.0012117911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688953,0.0008971259,0.00024139578,0.0001308346,0.0011211477,0.00072006736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029670082,0.00024987946,0.00028183032,0.002096995,0.008821168,0.007769225,0.0010051831,0.0022538141,0.010793773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007971613,0.00021180739,0.00022793852,0.002071495,0.029644752,0.0036793144,0.003937851,0.0050541325,0.00049641315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018364617,0.000010292964,0.002169522,0.000033020107,0.0000040709983,0.00013244306,0.010287371,0.000169395,0.000070682254,0.9703671,0.008129906,0.008607823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003949487,0.00005029949,0.021524074,0.00071803964,0.00004318709,0.0004440098,0.052804124,0.0009306037,0.0006596191,0.41796687,0.50471526,0.00010446637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8121752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8460401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18782479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052324936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08062961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37964576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418172035","doi":"","title":"Canadian developments. Criminal charges laid in three new situations.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07218636201605907,"score_gpt":0.287908660898104,"score_spread":0.21572229888204494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418172035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01325998,0.15838827,0.00048981304,0.13966092,0.0127000045,0.00036763123,0.23978446,0.00051680324,0.43483216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25807345,0.25501183,0.004187715,0.029063577,0.004811844,0.0004168195,0.09914368,0.00027755034,0.34901357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962716,0.00018853873,0.0003042877,0.00014792,0.002381909,0.0007057057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692388,0.0024018039,0.0016077163,0.00036585453,0.023042463,0.003343239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001981104,0.00077555096,0.0004976957,0.013662374,0.008787183,0.0034749843,0.002523752,0.0023511674,0.04750055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018193206,0.00058076525,0.000639682,0.021689834,0.001401577,0.0017565432,0.0013544648,0.0029585906,0.004572336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004338326,0.00001196999,0.0034884159,0.00053295324,0.000012519427,0.00015313305,0.00028848226,0.00006833488,0.000024365738,0.0052655158,0.95065075,0.03946009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375591,0.000027838103,0.068412036,0.0010014375,0.000082058046,0.0002208153,0.0019172174,0.000108277694,0.00012599207,0.0013032925,0.9267033,0.00005405937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99532807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054454938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054454938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19164525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39510006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W242310400","doi":"","title":"Investigative Hearings into Terrorist Offences: A Challenge to the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Obligation; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Interpretation (philosophy); Suspect; Criminal procedure; Criminal code; Computer science","score_opus":0.09540794634238248,"score_gpt":0.40028758582822466,"score_spread":0.3048796394858422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W242310400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028072004,0.007155614,0.0055387765,0.9123061,0.0021014034,0.000046840625,0.00006832041,0.000062988525,0.06991276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5452456,0.026859298,0.018207004,0.33888945,0.02405475,0.0004356746,0.00019051411,0.0003350787,0.045782644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92783016,0.043106902,0.003838468,0.0037105677,0.01642983,0.0050840066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6255534,0.3261961,0.00803128,0.012189285,0.01939931,0.008630533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09853981,0.0005491305,0.0019427569,0.0036409723,0.014043092,0.034152333,0.0050256117,0.029160088,0.012990981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2859904,0.001068058,0.0010165641,0.0021670144,0.054466024,0.02989212,0.0143790245,0.03178735,0.0029509738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075868025,0.000091602495,0.00052988465,0.0002857302,0.000025041678,0.00060915586,0.016727984,0.00026068807,0.0002521863,0.6643506,0.21617769,0.10061351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083723025,0.000073265735,0.0017750654,0.0021366612,0.000024694818,0.0005262295,0.01907068,0.00047629094,0.00029804502,0.6353673,0.34004897,0.00011916179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014851484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018847864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09853981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064961463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02648447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5211345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2430966300","doi":"","title":"The Elusive Goal of Impartiality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Faith; Law; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.034034443408597854,"score_gpt":0.3183315617562773,"score_spread":0.28429711834767946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2430966300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022417529,0.0066506607,0.13215469,0.13494974,0.0020447308,0.00019823361,0.00023652904,0.0002960353,0.70105183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92427254,0.0026749568,0.020531472,0.013860682,0.0027212158,0.000388166,0.00014723519,0.000309896,0.035093915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592872,0.018760938,0.0022644044,0.008512412,0.008021238,0.003153808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536146,0.019312028,0.0030296529,0.014614706,0.007265417,0.0021636295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045158032,0.0008981935,0.0020043317,0.0023201506,0.00771232,0.020204483,0.004431808,0.008430419,0.007859841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07349321,0.0007640997,0.0011783122,0.0012558008,0.07085251,0.020762809,0.017240096,0.013722933,0.003789284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007276674,0.000005929812,0.00007356347,0.00002125764,0.000009115199,0.000022286866,0.00047325413,0.000117100135,0.000042236006,0.99450547,0.0017058115,0.0030167361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010056023,0.000012861481,0.00007089719,0.00007498255,0.000008521667,0.000038995822,0.0002113997,0.00019726166,0.00014090705,0.9784347,0.02078869,0.000010881015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022577506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014388456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045158032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005308452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009006144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23882133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243170063","doi":"","title":"Beyond Self-Congratulation: The Charter at 25 in an International Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Charter; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.014464263385026087,"score_gpt":0.3339902461082677,"score_spread":0.3195259827232416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243170063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010622878,0.008605331,0.0020231432,0.26222205,0.004525495,0.000030149056,0.00009244369,0.00004166915,0.7118369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82658464,0.007152176,0.001567813,0.04668201,0.002164334,0.00006318958,0.00009266811,0.00019071541,0.115502454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919761,0.0018172025,0.0001048577,0.0006299345,0.0015531289,0.0039187823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915109,0.0021962232,0.00031511285,0.00060578546,0.0021522373,0.0032196997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081880065,0.00057567575,0.0005511908,0.0014387051,0.023365313,0.019750169,0.0022633064,0.0059280256,0.009834549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014884813,0.00021998839,0.00046874143,0.0026828873,0.045037452,0.01038408,0.006909068,0.016447328,0.00069303653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074053705,0.0000045171178,0.0001507842,0.000012065422,0.0000015500103,0.000061582934,0.008888255,0.000054307373,0.000019216406,0.95759416,0.028142111,0.0050640176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094534225,0.000013786693,0.0016743542,0.00024405122,0.000008531191,0.00008305223,0.033254955,0.00012657372,0.00011310904,0.13481097,0.82961607,0.00004510268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73062146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81475973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73062146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041650306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07840543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5419299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243230475","doi":"","title":"Process and Substance: Charkaoui I in the Light of Subsequent Developments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Minimalism (technical communication); Law; Political science; Principle of legality; Charter; Terrorism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03575217836785541,"score_gpt":0.30254065242771777,"score_spread":0.2667884740598624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243230475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12223314,0.0064341812,0.012794409,0.15335757,0.0011635857,0.00026058074,0.00011406234,0.000081644044,0.70356077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94994813,0.0015234228,0.00371215,0.013218218,0.00037489494,0.000096788244,0.00003184711,0.000046742494,0.031047681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856311,0.0018124335,0.0004286517,0.0018143565,0.0059467545,0.004366668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872957,0.005828506,0.0012282416,0.00095949066,0.0034598222,0.0012281662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011196656,0.0004924308,0.0007210991,0.0028177076,0.019284878,0.022698952,0.0032069297,0.008815029,0.0038849912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026130805,0.00055698055,0.0009031124,0.002576326,0.05154962,0.009778431,0.007104763,0.016914636,0.00031765108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014011794,0.000007267088,0.00033939895,0.00001589623,0.000002218024,0.00014669629,0.004276659,0.000097994045,0.00013777161,0.9913652,0.0010913152,0.0025056743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060668583,0.00009359757,0.007145674,0.00056407007,0.00006802378,0.00032050276,0.016348189,0.0018916654,0.0024343878,0.7147662,0.25612026,0.00018682107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5690956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6076778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5690956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06486943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08691498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8668841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2434966172","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2792472","title":"Facial Attacks on Telewarrants: Failure to Define 'Impracticable'","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computer security; Psychology","score_opus":0.02247972472123791,"score_gpt":0.3250773761652835,"score_spread":0.3025976514440456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2434966172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3544061,0.010096052,0.05443386,0.046394836,0.0027810035,0.0008372873,0.0021134878,0.00029589655,0.52864146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749152,0.0018819625,0.009663771,0.0064654285,0.00053020404,0.00021576282,0.0003243549,0.000059697064,0.0059436555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98240894,0.0076254136,0.0022378399,0.0011432499,0.005300047,0.001284614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244937,0.041668046,0.009669322,0.012597391,0.010082811,0.0014887217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015677027,0.00045151435,0.0003956238,0.0039057713,0.002561994,0.00352375,0.0028835793,0.005653597,0.005118661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090236396,0.0002931243,0.00057189376,0.0015133707,0.009293315,0.0051747956,0.0034339484,0.0068497015,0.0016425233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045124578,0.00027022653,0.070650056,0.0016263117,0.00007043212,0.0026501035,0.012752643,0.0010370723,0.0022618284,0.5627262,0.047067348,0.29843658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012166096,0.0011355724,0.17590837,0.009112687,0.00039555205,0.022676297,0.028210826,0.006232202,0.0165143,0.3582232,0.38115227,0.00031701496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003924603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073283683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015677027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017108138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003475805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08290899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2435699182","doi":"","title":"Ontario Court of Justice dismisses police negligence case: HIV infection a factor.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Res ipsa loquitur; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Law; Political science; Criminology; Tort; Medicine; Psychology; Virology; Liability","score_opus":0.07934118437442574,"score_gpt":0.32304969357856195,"score_spread":0.24370850920413623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2435699182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16689521,0.015063048,0.00049146503,0.447897,0.0040282034,0.0003664057,0.0028709476,0.0000683296,0.36231947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63418645,0.011374721,0.0006351429,0.14845274,0.0016405393,0.00009329628,0.00070409855,0.000045147415,0.20286778],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742764,0.00013629669,0.00009841303,0.00012460379,0.0013429901,0.000869929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958204,0.000985684,0.00032738058,0.00012479287,0.0014543111,0.0012873292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014855999,0.00036752856,0.00038598265,0.0012807675,0.019873342,0.0026651502,0.0017814991,0.009604443,0.007880135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01067745,0.000606937,0.0004808916,0.0016403103,0.0031609884,0.0007911748,0.001448614,0.0077128387,0.0007636561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028921093,0.00012834623,0.061216623,0.0002192139,0.00012904879,0.033899102,0.0155359125,0.00019041968,0.0016208302,0.05386477,0.8075468,0.025359703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022909639,0.00011489847,0.18329614,0.00069991604,0.00032901013,0.0050400295,0.013303954,0.0004385298,0.0011215351,0.005823488,0.7893786,0.00022476922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99460876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039814133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085742824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28887308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244850686","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1421","title":"When the Law Breaks Down: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and Governmental Defiance of the Rule of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011896151923030843,"score_gpt":0.25592211491973,"score_spread":0.24402596299669915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244850686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22162952,0.013048272,0.00016779639,0.7214454,0.0032786273,0.00008957457,0.00055559806,0.00002848761,0.03975685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7526878,0.01545674,0.00033545992,0.20115651,0.0016513095,0.000088600784,0.00023916349,0.000080583115,0.028303804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99403894,0.00084926543,0.00024988104,0.00036160272,0.0013089947,0.0031913994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98003894,0.007850164,0.0020801714,0.00034260974,0.005476596,0.00421145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051946463,0.0006430148,0.00089457305,0.002368401,0.061444156,0.009899657,0.00520567,0.015711788,0.004951022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023751594,0.00061862083,0.00068230456,0.0070780306,0.019794732,0.0033384108,0.0042117364,0.017097173,0.00034037323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009714226,0.000049909453,0.02650118,0.0003418113,0.000049718386,0.0032971594,0.6960133,0.0001931234,0.000294664,0.028249914,0.23113361,0.0137785645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018551209,0.000027680235,0.03540058,0.00074333424,0.0000675633,0.00035965766,0.85565054,0.000097314536,0.00017420576,0.002046749,0.10528899,0.00012491633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99590164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079215266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17804225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5747497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461021661","doi":"10.7202/1036577ar","title":"Municipalités et hydrocarbures : chargées à blanc sur la ligne de front?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.029500633432145828,"score_gpt":0.2974677440520522,"score_spread":0.26796711061990636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461021661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63244873,0.018401716,0.0027636304,0.06814432,0.00046585785,0.0000865301,0.00045803766,0.00004516321,0.27718607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752343,0.0038444907,0.000533115,0.0024223104,0.000078158955,0.000021746266,0.00008147935,0.000015703332,0.017768653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664694,0.0009081208,0.00015598735,0.0003665836,0.0012555908,0.00066671596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945141,0.0023158572,0.0014627618,0.00038094795,0.00088022253,0.00044604504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019407663,0.00018073818,0.00045819322,0.0009980976,0.005802678,0.0072138505,0.0010281423,0.0021154599,0.014076102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01217423,0.00027272242,0.00031686167,0.0028096656,0.0070396424,0.0036674456,0.0048257173,0.0025630703,0.00054362614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022662923,0.00015453504,0.13116907,0.0010362419,0.00014641804,0.002209452,0.07332515,0.0005328955,0.0011113235,0.6326135,0.019493034,0.13798182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006383178,0.00017585752,0.26459277,0.0022557254,0.00022608545,0.00096325134,0.15709348,0.00039381636,0.0015594572,0.058335014,0.5142434,0.000097254924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15040143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32356334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15040143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006595952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008895744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29905194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470822190","doi":"","title":"Les tribunaux et les possibilités de redressement d’une politique défectueuse: l’exemple de la cause Wynberg","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019772998910635886,"score_gpt":0.2757011076817791,"score_spread":0.2559281087711432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470822190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2186724,0.008046633,0.008290232,0.05071781,0.00034112894,0.00006230385,0.00006821277,0.000046441048,0.71375483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8390829,0.0020943168,0.0012789861,0.0024309994,0.000047542053,0.000038033315,0.00001845894,0.000032728913,0.15497598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972892,0.0006886618,0.00006910364,0.0003077722,0.000495417,0.0011499198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989957,0.0003001396,0.00010503966,0.00015417392,0.00022944345,0.00021550088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021471188,0.00027172733,0.00032008855,0.00079503754,0.014047556,0.0074118106,0.00086114433,0.002360953,0.0050173686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035059412,0.00026409203,0.00024643296,0.0008158509,0.013744279,0.0026310808,0.0037714716,0.004248809,0.00047796775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018538803,0.000012218814,0.0015323306,0.000026924736,0.0000047231338,0.0005312121,0.028321555,0.00011697101,0.00033241606,0.94953865,0.0053808796,0.014183599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032923956,0.00004854304,0.01223278,0.00053139665,0.000040000774,0.00097393506,0.0623251,0.00074597675,0.0017408718,0.1875249,0.73374546,0.00005824154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35229266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49812686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35229266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013322717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016576216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70048416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474446899","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Browse Acts by Department","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Public administration; Public relations","score_opus":0.06534571506068343,"score_gpt":0.31036194272545564,"score_spread":0.2450162276647722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474446899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05408816,0.0024777702,0.0006162084,0.0065475204,0.0009831463,0.00075783115,0.1882497,0.00078988075,0.7454897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10987225,0.0034077084,0.0028947447,0.004343894,0.00012504264,0.00055971945,0.081351005,0.00080311013,0.7966424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981913,0.00016837835,0.00017289585,0.0001320692,0.0009021333,0.00043321046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217564,0.0032244802,0.0008068107,0.0008581434,0.0021703867,0.00076462113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016663824,0.00051071285,0.00043712184,0.008924381,0.0038983799,0.0038574482,0.0012753444,0.001098742,0.08358161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009147109,0.000620388,0.00034537897,0.013989347,0.0007264383,0.0015219114,0.0016065738,0.0015315367,0.024237601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013029197,0.00007756286,0.024158359,0.00034935705,0.000023104496,0.00031414864,0.0041857,0.00016226561,0.0007059361,0.009376381,0.91126657,0.049250312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017564827,0.000012213721,0.122365884,0.00026064028,0.000018794522,0.00010973141,0.0051816,0.00008729773,0.0011610982,0.0006649344,0.87007177,0.000048537557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7061258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9382315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2938742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010315089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018602066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59120977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476760318","doi":"","title":"Tickets … and More Tickets: A Case Study of the Enforcement of the Ontario Safe Streets Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Law enforcement; Advertising; Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03803191071512667,"score_gpt":0.31200037193663355,"score_spread":0.27396846122150686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476760318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97222835,0.00057438295,0.0002532867,0.0046872525,0.00003777088,0.00007820123,0.000073609124,0.000004217021,0.022062805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822886,0.0012124398,0.0005264577,0.001213021,0.000021501432,0.00003298718,0.00005443368,0.000012621851,0.014637842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458534,0.0017202345,0.0002105354,0.0003485196,0.0016438083,0.0014916565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229383,0.0037453147,0.0016514066,0.0003438197,0.0010728848,0.0008926794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031632609,0.0005005169,0.0004824467,0.0021037993,0.030708224,0.003739271,0.0024149066,0.0059928917,0.0036351574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015603873,0.0009783272,0.00050326914,0.0035693438,0.008686364,0.0023954245,0.003026019,0.005090227,0.00029710378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021897072,0.0006308868,0.12841396,0.00026924303,0.00008252681,0.048356596,0.75021094,0.000532458,0.0013655606,0.032018915,0.014152325,0.023747616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043049717,0.00013604849,0.10121633,0.0003867671,0.000103383034,0.0090111345,0.82517284,0.0010189576,0.000751835,0.0014257053,0.060637534,0.00009635054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92649734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07350266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035640195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037063282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2585889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478701778","doi":"","title":"Annotation: United States v Wakeling (Supreme Court of Canada 2014)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Annotation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02610424271897465,"score_gpt":0.29400875368371004,"score_spread":0.2679045109647354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478701778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022707344,0.0027810875,0.0020981682,0.19221285,0.049818747,0.0009683386,0.062353842,0.0013950146,0.6861012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027183367,0.0029032321,0.0039696144,0.25709,0.014325297,0.0020635256,0.022602763,0.0010413474,0.66882086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98569655,0.0012532693,0.000920543,0.0011388739,0.007932607,0.0030582254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683193,0.009936352,0.0008546996,0.0016405326,0.018410085,0.00083903474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061823926,0.0012116152,0.0020621684,0.006742052,0.01946927,0.011687814,0.006887475,0.03313624,0.083986305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039592385,0.0013647856,0.0018058729,0.009484746,0.0038320974,0.0041972306,0.0038569297,0.012956657,0.02897977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116011915,0.0000049969917,0.00005909195,0.00006943629,0.0000022672207,0.000048529895,0.00019680549,0.000028640341,0.000029434086,0.009318487,0.9886967,0.0015341172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026837151,0.000006770317,0.0012301201,0.00059910916,0.000027268019,0.000037162637,0.00044576396,0.00012315398,0.00015168582,0.0051527754,0.99214244,0.000056875077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83539677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8655813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16460323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041031823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07632679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33114517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480676912","doi":"10.29173/alr291","title":"Enforcing American Letters of Request: The Fickle Charter Guarantee of Evidentiary Immunity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Self-incrimination; Sociology; History; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.05785432683546389,"score_gpt":0.3551757091715892,"score_spread":0.2973213823361253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480676912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03400663,0.0151412,0.023486467,0.15649903,0.0019637372,0.00015751648,0.00027942398,0.00019924314,0.7682667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83089334,0.009929351,0.020472873,0.0533624,0.001226813,0.00016594323,0.00014363516,0.00010449851,0.08370113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774086,0.005993062,0.0010893275,0.0020767145,0.010352027,0.003080356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96334106,0.020462934,0.0022723607,0.0031770037,0.00940499,0.0013416726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015118326,0.00025738528,0.00082195154,0.001732101,0.0067911386,0.009940233,0.0019648531,0.008895756,0.0074892244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06189551,0.00051714084,0.0004817248,0.0016182007,0.01414575,0.005606968,0.0033572086,0.007939233,0.0014497367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021190826,0.0000150869555,0.00044575968,0.000062986044,0.000004795633,0.000117668045,0.0010664343,0.00017660664,0.0001300539,0.9554722,0.016870376,0.02561692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008764967,0.00006828897,0.004999253,0.0009751455,0.00005673446,0.000336142,0.0017190187,0.0011667112,0.001193599,0.5168137,0.4724647,0.00011910127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24716029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3745812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24716029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011611199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044746663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49144328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483492331","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267805.003.0005","title":"The Admissibility of Expert Evidence: (1) Evidentiary Reliability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rules of evidence; Federal Rules of Evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Admissible evidence; Set (abstract data type); Construct (python library); Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.105476845067538,"score_gpt":0.3847749821384953,"score_spread":0.2792981370709573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483492331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024365628,0.01763267,0.5430269,0.03646612,0.0013732789,0.00033553052,0.0003074418,0.00016046982,0.3763319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82060784,0.006033921,0.14372875,0.007845097,0.0027305905,0.0006352795,0.00017270393,0.00015023061,0.018095618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9110668,0.044887174,0.006525434,0.0057918928,0.029886272,0.0018424237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6617268,0.26678616,0.012489897,0.030040652,0.027656317,0.0013001225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06257767,0.00065041316,0.001946632,0.005138129,0.00237723,0.011200405,0.004136181,0.0069428287,0.004645341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22672603,0.0010663653,0.0014524846,0.0023032452,0.030438228,0.013389712,0.005737921,0.011040211,0.0016601898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015981905,0.000012156884,0.0003137832,0.00012712095,0.000023695982,0.000084079446,0.00034589047,0.0006366743,0.0001375587,0.9873253,0.0013652134,0.009612642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014612114,0.00002004945,0.0003630023,0.00036957668,0.000020555664,0.00015846384,0.00009390463,0.0016628383,0.0003779266,0.98683494,0.010067101,0.000017111044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010618086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009979854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06257767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002993583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032162028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3309464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489364563","doi":"","title":"Six Degrees of Separation: Canadian Accessory Liability in Afghan War Crimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Doctrine; Causation; Law; Torture; Commit; Political science; Liability; War crime; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; International law; Criminology; Human rights","score_opus":0.16316883978141764,"score_gpt":0.40295478023378983,"score_spread":0.2397859404523722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489364563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74404174,0.002723802,0.000660997,0.020220501,0.00014724664,0.00007745357,0.00020999082,0.0000142242725,0.2319041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028873,0.0008329524,0.00017943031,0.0015891878,0.000021759977,0.0000110310175,0.000052260835,0.0000077930345,0.007016892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964091,0.00029371286,0.00009479263,0.0002563764,0.0010306028,0.0019154602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970451,0.00039794506,0.00046132883,0.00011287121,0.00077277794,0.0012099901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011931532,0.00029290555,0.00037067605,0.002127797,0.02426152,0.004569904,0.0014857436,0.002061354,0.00501358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006298062,0.00031914306,0.00036996312,0.0031176065,0.01285977,0.0016738877,0.007728778,0.004916978,0.00017996125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016708278,0.00013283678,0.089047894,0.00012742022,0.000038338145,0.0051124576,0.13250382,0.0007414993,0.0005781015,0.6865002,0.028481591,0.05656873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105116465,0.00011397234,0.3235996,0.0007889685,0.00018196781,0.0071722562,0.26969486,0.0021691215,0.0007896399,0.07827009,0.31676266,0.00035169168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97659886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058322556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058322556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06760949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42316175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490014595","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Canadian law: Law reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07051856764996028,"score_gpt":0.31627127700367474,"score_spread":0.24575270935371446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490014595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031130214,0.08168304,0.0007666292,0.05622995,0.0045962613,0.00016093369,0.012122279,0.0004665185,0.84086144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015153645,0.014660337,0.00083938264,0.0032906784,0.00036989868,0.00007964892,0.0012588243,0.00014036156,0.9642073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794,0.00017454443,0.00009887998,0.00017755826,0.0011763035,0.0004326568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967986,0.0003600271,0.00008555357,0.00013741171,0.002182283,0.00043618862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016924709,0.0013871785,0.00081705296,0.005226017,0.012223552,0.011658043,0.0018886053,0.007806587,0.1483504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055858186,0.0010694752,0.0006891329,0.010449686,0.0033606247,0.0038263227,0.0024001787,0.0053509204,0.010107094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013610465,0.00001374525,0.00029876962,0.00017630351,0.0000046242358,0.000065565415,0.00047618453,0.00016146396,0.000043641507,0.09354962,0.87909275,0.026103806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056787294,0.0000029651544,0.0018960891,0.00024938124,0.0000068533254,0.000020609203,0.0004911844,0.000077325836,0.00006568155,0.003936144,0.99322826,0.000019875477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99418133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1483504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09649696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20230056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70013773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493488433","doi":"10.29173/alr12","title":"History of Factums","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.04623457965126544,"score_gpt":0.32147762775727123,"score_spread":0.2752430481060058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493488433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010899385,0.16022295,0.005593075,0.05032245,0.005608148,0.0001324552,0.0014950276,0.00019163273,0.7655349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49074513,0.19494148,0.0073141092,0.017108964,0.0028648118,0.00018197275,0.001533704,0.0005784185,0.28473136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990734,0.0020399687,0.00047213523,0.0011347862,0.0043280595,0.0012910243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806435,0.0073895915,0.0007334984,0.0012345973,0.009052808,0.00094614783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006670176,0.0005559752,0.0007737081,0.0077240355,0.017322816,0.015252101,0.0025973,0.0033519538,0.013728116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020149574,0.00061722565,0.00047714176,0.012354833,0.026601559,0.0059484183,0.0031443436,0.00545907,0.0018839865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027048409,0.000008859428,0.00045280787,0.00039951727,0.000013572018,0.00027480663,0.01264737,0.0002310959,0.00013260473,0.86084384,0.0596039,0.06536461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017268472,0.0000032871278,0.0006314169,0.00042362895,0.0000051784154,0.000047434667,0.0011216504,0.00003057336,0.00008897775,0.010390908,0.9872433,0.000011892869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84623337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8487747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84623337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09562492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09744633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69381064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495669462","doi":"10.29173/alr381","title":"Tessling, Brown, and A.M.: Towards a Principled Approach to Section 8","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Law; Section (typography); Balance (ability); Expectation of privacy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10847502019986824,"score_gpt":0.3655767767496166,"score_spread":0.2571017565497483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495669462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025854865,0.014278028,0.070297524,0.59510773,0.0013058961,0.00030009358,0.00015500603,0.0001381188,0.29256278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7146032,0.0072581596,0.05761879,0.18283908,0.0015069053,0.00059384736,0.000067040724,0.00006429559,0.035448737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824027,0.007160181,0.0009332374,0.0013816137,0.0065021142,0.0016200965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801532,0.014691468,0.0010200511,0.0007748286,0.0028657864,0.00049463037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024418158,0.00045194934,0.000713777,0.002259731,0.008780296,0.010552515,0.003250609,0.014320619,0.0010127699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025328992,0.00069291407,0.0008993976,0.0011726136,0.047333907,0.005542004,0.0044519436,0.015240547,0.00033454734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000278825,0.0000056770773,0.00014197473,0.000020594796,0.000002431623,0.0000808165,0.0016006207,0.00020507434,0.00005944141,0.9893917,0.0061202785,0.002368691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014318088,0.000019540554,0.00034742174,0.00034243483,0.0000114987415,0.000096755866,0.0012045961,0.0006237414,0.00035714442,0.92585754,0.07109381,0.00003110552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07325995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09219951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07325995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01269937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03530487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14566708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496769881","doi":"10.29173/alr178","title":"Discarding Reasonable Expectations of Privacy: A Critique of R. v. Patrick","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expectation of privacy; Warrant; Appeal; Law; Residence; Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02491581214226828,"score_gpt":0.3569125698918367,"score_spread":0.3319967577495684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496769881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004231101,0.011036718,0.009549356,0.8848135,0.001587674,0.000072454975,0.00022976458,0.00006660113,0.088412866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36828357,0.009039896,0.007675715,0.5924725,0.007916816,0.00031352998,0.00010426117,0.0001870888,0.014006579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9551745,0.017436765,0.0022534085,0.006062929,0.015564409,0.0035079939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8619565,0.115478344,0.0030725854,0.003927742,0.01312034,0.0024444591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06329146,0.0010631791,0.0028206795,0.0037473268,0.010385892,0.013447618,0.009197352,0.039310724,0.0038269402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11770235,0.0011788163,0.0023914739,0.0030485564,0.06671277,0.012810982,0.0048849694,0.051888704,0.0010934637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016237727,0.000005739459,0.00011143643,0.00006427936,0.000017825238,0.00013633205,0.0014631484,0.00020875927,0.000027445507,0.96511424,0.030063689,0.0027708262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007852646,0.000020971574,0.0003819754,0.00057711336,0.000049662845,0.00015486767,0.0011663589,0.00068349123,0.00019181156,0.87872124,0.117894605,0.000079345264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24005345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17971699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028919775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045145467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4773124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497831312","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139924511.006","title":"The Attorney General, Select Committees and Penal Populism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Law; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.06904944099096307,"score_gpt":0.26986519098702794,"score_spread":0.20081574999606489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497831312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006886079,0.11494853,0.0014474209,0.098758385,0.0018772695,0.00003497898,0.000072253286,0.000029953053,0.7759451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21039431,0.033766266,0.00073374656,0.0236403,0.002971137,0.00012426761,0.00007173754,0.00007722488,0.728221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973099,0.0011756208,0.00011309754,0.00023035203,0.00076491147,0.00040612213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971123,0.0020792254,0.00016255077,0.00013412748,0.0002730937,0.00023863175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003305255,0.0004627288,0.0005174727,0.0018823901,0.007911407,0.011453686,0.0011170981,0.007573058,0.021288024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008221777,0.0006055029,0.00018496173,0.0033442911,0.012131027,0.005570894,0.003039515,0.006086057,0.0027347566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072369567,0.000018462566,0.00020850926,0.000048138812,0.0000024685733,0.00004809577,0.0021024065,0.00007198092,0.000028803035,0.844795,0.12878482,0.02388408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016505657,0.000012943399,0.0018219831,0.000602577,0.000005890816,0.00009507912,0.0036389013,0.00020646157,0.00009621713,0.33343372,0.6600527,0.000016967597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020932477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07058083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021288024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066271354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007124234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07121557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502483087","doi":"10.3917/puf.incha.2010.01","title":"L’erreur judiciaire","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Presses Universitaires de France eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.017987787991761484,"score_gpt":0.2554283134352458,"score_spread":0.23744052544348432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502483087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020632394,0.0058321846,0.010624095,0.06472411,0.0019316019,0.000041449977,0.00011580816,0.00012423003,0.89597404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6479647,0.0044881916,0.0052125882,0.03048374,0.0013032784,0.000072320974,0.00015908483,0.0002757643,0.3100404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773451,0.00734756,0.0007209934,0.0031118975,0.008675866,0.002798685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252146,0.002201882,0.0008112981,0.0012791939,0.002103376,0.0010828098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070484504,0.00057305023,0.0004888218,0.0010321558,0.009736725,0.012491123,0.0013167359,0.0047127116,0.015091242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016803388,0.00042947184,0.0004635089,0.0008320683,0.022047384,0.004492731,0.005910612,0.011149422,0.006125048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001981309,0.00001526737,0.0013992988,0.00003105956,0.000011957443,0.000121059486,0.004682976,0.00019547693,0.00038192677,0.94355184,0.028628696,0.020960653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013535577,0.000039316557,0.004409871,0.00031190505,0.0000089731975,0.00036633,0.003582134,0.00035877034,0.00051628007,0.14785714,0.8424868,0.000048975344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03671708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037000272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03671708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008396692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011471056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07300675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503225817","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493874.028","title":"Postscript: Some recent developments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); Terrorism; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05531350893714272,"score_gpt":0.25496451295626077,"score_spread":0.19965100401911806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503225817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009536972,0.11376229,0.0018237651,0.10668481,0.32564527,0.00014144776,0.0010831981,0.0004323821,0.4494732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050279624,0.0707129,0.002120123,0.024594424,0.050108783,0.000100374185,0.0010265366,0.00025307454,0.84605575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901795,0.000109786575,0.0000637383,0.0001240143,0.0005932313,0.00009134966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720424,0.0006997059,0.00009786161,0.00016547072,0.0014975211,0.00033519283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017366904,0.0006043006,0.00047964114,0.0024816473,0.0015537492,0.005582082,0.0011856079,0.0025558078,0.12711868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064546615,0.0002895363,0.00048880366,0.00263968,0.0009890933,0.0042019766,0.0013495332,0.0040592835,0.0512778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128363945,0.000021122461,0.000028545839,0.00029410122,0.0000014690335,0.00007170095,0.000099405566,0.00004432475,0.00013355908,0.012634662,0.9116908,0.07496735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013979278,0.0000053436484,0.00008259425,0.00013429672,0.0000011629884,0.00004082189,0.00003304688,0.000010565652,0.00003642622,0.0007189088,0.99893326,0.0000021650806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050004385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00958199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12711868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032551158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026388403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42525434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508640702","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/et3dq","title":"Instrumentalizing the Expressive: Transplanting Sentencing Circles into the Canadian Criminal Trial","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Instrumentalism; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Law reform; Mediation; Sociology","score_opus":0.05673834850736007,"score_gpt":0.3474162921212752,"score_spread":0.29067794361391514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508640702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40717453,0.060504295,0.0062552667,0.13510233,0.0011734567,0.00034426057,0.00044563378,0.00012018579,0.38888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739915,0.00973775,0.002495215,0.004166432,0.00006887505,0.00006634712,0.00006758348,0.00004554213,0.009360791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98800826,0.0037961965,0.00035483524,0.0007790371,0.0040191766,0.0030423636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986476,0.005273411,0.00083142705,0.0008934213,0.004752723,0.0017731284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013105905,0.00035390726,0.0004921317,0.0050405455,0.036739524,0.017269293,0.0033497869,0.0027962734,0.0037418015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03211672,0.00047927667,0.00038048835,0.007772718,0.03265543,0.0067818332,0.008137912,0.0040681665,0.0002332866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078516015,0.000053868294,0.008954718,0.0005208599,0.000029449739,0.00077977247,0.23633695,0.00080169464,0.0004463784,0.5644607,0.023836551,0.16370063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003074124,0.00005430979,0.038563125,0.0017879365,0.00011809005,0.0003065691,0.36523917,0.00072297954,0.0010862404,0.039063346,0.55286455,0.00016285566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81107914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18892089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3028269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94073683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515375725","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2016.20603","title":"La résolution judiciaire du conflit (JDR) par les juges en Alberta : un modèle hybride","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03473260091732318,"score_gpt":0.2789906476953491,"score_spread":0.24425804677802593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515375725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21398559,0.005615127,0.09374926,0.029922001,0.0004029738,0.0005292689,0.00049251673,0.00024237172,0.65506095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150195,0.0017828124,0.01824008,0.0007330015,0.000043627224,0.00016898874,0.0001539379,0.00003429713,0.0638238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962435,0.0013912822,0.00007105123,0.00043977005,0.0011173502,0.0007372021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975642,0.00088746636,0.00019410305,0.00023603997,0.0006766165,0.000441644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040208986,0.0006004368,0.0005496033,0.0018229559,0.006772689,0.008804536,0.0030612666,0.0029671832,0.0092192255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048516057,0.000514751,0.00064858096,0.002187016,0.013324665,0.0028801262,0.0038861502,0.0022951148,0.0006652276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006319872,0.0000796993,0.005918142,0.00009510298,0.00003715949,0.0002523505,0.01166946,0.008722065,0.00023781427,0.9444105,0.0035515013,0.024963055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000290385,0.00025303566,0.029910538,0.0009472396,0.00029859535,0.0005632313,0.052658163,0.05815579,0.0009198344,0.586096,0.26964563,0.00026148724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81146383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83135694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18853617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03891384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06494948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37929296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516326442","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Privilege: A Relational Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028662243825128844,"score_gpt":0.2894202858813248,"score_spread":0.26075804205619596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516326442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026116857,0.004550219,0.122663766,0.029683856,0.00045535938,0.0001481988,0.000092247,0.00009331924,0.8161962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588824,0.0017382556,0.012100975,0.0022741864,0.0006280397,0.00013903253,0.000052419386,0.000069739806,0.02411494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986961,0.0061182464,0.00052652234,0.0018428299,0.0032684696,0.0012829178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919242,0.004089077,0.0007209488,0.001318436,0.0012474194,0.000699871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008760178,0.00042049325,0.000651605,0.003422278,0.0064345165,0.017381763,0.002500714,0.0049469457,0.008309854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014482181,0.00054067647,0.0007403729,0.0020480158,0.047082786,0.017584354,0.009492934,0.0068431916,0.0011742652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022966267,0.0000031162917,0.00006862247,0.000008262121,0.0000013772868,0.000020504269,0.0013645652,0.000044108223,0.000032127817,0.9969117,0.00019553008,0.0013478561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010596563,0.000019938027,0.000562413,0.00011843623,0.00001585864,0.00015940834,0.0024120852,0.00061671133,0.0001917598,0.93998486,0.055892475,0.000015413218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008323276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00721891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017381763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011008461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00708156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516442558","doi":"10.29173/alr244","title":"Do We Throw Our Privacy Rights Out With the Trash? The Alberta Court of Appeal’s Decision in &lt;i&gt;R. v. Patrick&lt;/i&gt;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Garbage; Law; Bin; State (computer science); Personally identifiable information; Control (management); Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03905461183162117,"score_gpt":0.3173526991077906,"score_spread":0.27829808727616945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516442558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039275517,0.032555416,0.0007386266,0.7665893,0.0013096816,0.000025289384,0.00026711513,0.000048825004,0.19453827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29551578,0.03823843,0.0027852275,0.4972479,0.0017971755,0.000060620958,0.00029034624,0.00007922117,0.16398534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919912,0.0013525274,0.00015620264,0.0005970514,0.0037199897,0.0021830308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99099934,0.0035564685,0.00039589757,0.0005682028,0.0033760485,0.0011040654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066229524,0.0003327946,0.0005607789,0.001423664,0.011543184,0.010730494,0.0032515174,0.010331794,0.011478126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013803814,0.00045379848,0.00041174344,0.0019677072,0.015124128,0.0057057855,0.001513702,0.011327727,0.0021079388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017209692,0.000020491054,0.0013665055,0.00015179369,0.000016720038,0.00021559588,0.0020925694,0.00007553771,0.00015597271,0.51045036,0.4498777,0.035559494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022623348,0.00001548301,0.0051514544,0.0007033056,0.000042115495,0.00020171182,0.0046482226,0.00011250276,0.00029081013,0.0599714,0.92879397,0.000046513065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8117279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88583684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18827212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022360345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071644306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37876177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519542234","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2016.6","title":"<i>Kazemi</i>ou l’inhumaine immunité de l’État tortionnaire en droit canadien","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010662635580372561,"score_gpt":0.2556372702774987,"score_spread":0.24497463469712616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519542234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11268265,0.08220443,0.0031230354,0.14856128,0.002648588,0.00007473308,0.0003880051,0.000060623337,0.6502566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8950494,0.024474556,0.0010463577,0.016269417,0.0006606565,0.000057807243,0.00013536833,0.000024690331,0.062281754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735403,0.00093660696,0.00016911817,0.0002566374,0.0006161586,0.000667594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716455,0.0010905511,0.0005994398,0.0001700701,0.0006385197,0.0003368233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003081456,0.00029399974,0.0004211381,0.0020927167,0.0062493086,0.005386332,0.0007789629,0.002694551,0.0120573575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006711949,0.00020373675,0.00031167187,0.0019734334,0.01275816,0.0028701946,0.0032963678,0.004481772,0.0009768407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006709611,0.000048473925,0.0129669905,0.0004746295,0.000031123473,0.0008456838,0.051674914,0.00022137187,0.0004702044,0.85311,0.029837662,0.050251782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018487868,0.00010032855,0.05443152,0.0023320282,0.00009350757,0.0016161446,0.057336316,0.00019904973,0.0010059112,0.12142566,0.7613287,0.00011232516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12883018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19932714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8711698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082724625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011588718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25616062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520075891","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1320","title":"Hart and Mack: New Restraints on Mr. Big and a New Approach to Unreliable Prosecution Evidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Law; Federal Rules of Evidence; Political science; Admissible evidence; Digital evidence; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; History; Digital forensics","score_opus":0.2886321541641624,"score_gpt":0.3911996219176977,"score_spread":0.10256746775353531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520075891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090809595,0.03236691,0.011702727,0.87491256,0.00673439,0.00015757603,0.00014819198,0.00009953238,0.0647972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24865292,0.023237891,0.033481795,0.63276666,0.0152929695,0.00028757067,0.00010358232,0.00015608115,0.04602059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498205,0.013828019,0.0034264857,0.0045374935,0.025269283,0.0031181853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92360914,0.046892524,0.0035225651,0.0046771555,0.017818596,0.0034800854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03585006,0.00095171056,0.0011688899,0.0036506443,0.009048575,0.017168371,0.005422513,0.024011789,0.0026365446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06492119,0.0014207095,0.0013823312,0.0026640655,0.04935101,0.014776388,0.0043619885,0.03190425,0.0006637761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059149654,0.000033291457,0.001294638,0.00038048674,0.000055028275,0.0012734918,0.0064638807,0.00029582035,0.0012207783,0.7506069,0.20136108,0.0369555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014057521,0.00009158935,0.0065439264,0.0022163673,0.00017896548,0.0011747588,0.0044351867,0.001044102,0.0012881632,0.24100192,0.7414445,0.00043991653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3516897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5881118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023381216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039546367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69928527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520499638","doi":"","title":"Failure to Fund: The Link between Canada's Legal Aid Crisis & Unconstitutional Delay in the Provision of State-Funded Legal Counsel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; State (computer science); Law; Order (exchange); Charter; Political science; Business; Constitutional right; Constitution; Finance; Supreme court","score_opus":0.029944859982759406,"score_gpt":0.3068753765478664,"score_spread":0.276930516565107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520499638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7715383,0.0024649662,0.0008730787,0.14151439,0.00019024209,0.00010736353,0.0009353935,0.00006672466,0.082309574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99206185,0.00050135405,0.00017943642,0.0036935462,0.000031627496,0.000009656868,0.00008762824,0.000013307428,0.003421668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995921,0.0002681805,0.0001158552,0.00028507403,0.0013641794,0.0020457625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785437,0.0046449746,0.0045009977,0.00063187623,0.0063458686,0.0053325924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031511441,0.00019119798,0.00039504928,0.0017597852,0.009423186,0.0067761987,0.0025656815,0.003166715,0.007170083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025770063,0.00033114062,0.0002634432,0.0026508383,0.0070956824,0.0028573626,0.003561485,0.006625265,0.00027408046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003887806,0.00035316218,0.4069445,0.00020554935,0.000089315305,0.0021995967,0.024541937,0.0030758202,0.000866153,0.39802215,0.07832972,0.08498324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018118446,0.00018083629,0.6804924,0.0007435821,0.00022781455,0.0014363516,0.07437615,0.0066321474,0.0016670042,0.053312797,0.180464,0.00028576335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98987776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084300414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084300414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1678627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61164516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522421002","doi":"10.7202/1067938ar","title":"L’ÉTAT DE DROIT, AU COEUR DU DIALOGUE ENTRE LE CANADA ET L’AMÉRIQUE LATINE ?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; International law; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025400009666532917,"score_gpt":0.2726014270415647,"score_spread":0.2472014173750318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522421002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04842912,0.041238904,0.0011570747,0.56513137,0.001641928,0.00002673519,0.00028452516,0.000023307352,0.34206706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81800926,0.020944133,0.0008283445,0.09490774,0.00056696247,0.000053005166,0.00013437992,0.00007103164,0.06448518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933141,0.0024456338,0.00014690284,0.0005498839,0.0014334035,0.0021100745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917681,0.003569694,0.0006232901,0.0003233309,0.0024004746,0.0013150607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005220336,0.00035083253,0.0003935514,0.001823788,0.01554556,0.014715597,0.0015232146,0.0064487713,0.013667496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013457738,0.00026442157,0.00039308422,0.0031521523,0.030295834,0.009009038,0.0050807674,0.0085359365,0.00076739624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067237044,0.000038918493,0.008497432,0.00027069874,0.000028471939,0.000570363,0.0851978,0.00008908099,0.00030395767,0.7816688,0.08708416,0.03618312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025496047,0.000018027891,0.014189664,0.0024553253,0.000034602806,0.00021733568,0.2021349,0.000112704634,0.00036942237,0.04384859,0.73651063,0.00008325359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9177599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9471476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082240105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050528947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07315602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36661488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523706814","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4722","title":"Administrative Judicial Decisions as a Hybrid Argumentative Activity Type","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Task (project management); Presentation (obstetrics); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14837381276895004,"score_gpt":0.4268070866641011,"score_spread":0.27843327389515105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523706814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16564679,0.0010262829,0.3050107,0.0040577115,0.00020275521,0.00057085796,0.00026715366,0.0002001248,0.52301764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925814,0.00033413267,0.051923104,0.00024038045,0.00008014834,0.0003748014,0.00013712607,0.00009202681,0.021004397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97198784,0.019382464,0.0012977052,0.0016849756,0.004379275,0.0012677017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747774,0.0175857,0.0019042842,0.0030208987,0.001607267,0.0011042793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011645061,0.0005749234,0.000576745,0.00434185,0.002919183,0.017522572,0.0018186452,0.0037421447,0.0075881495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018070804,0.00063660456,0.0012115586,0.0033498867,0.0118267555,0.012481879,0.005923211,0.0028248953,0.0015334229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035195284,0.000037923088,0.0012932406,0.00007296953,0.000017676199,0.00030669154,0.01137448,0.0006811677,0.0007779587,0.9762132,0.00039961265,0.008789941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009456978,0.00014132765,0.002698469,0.00041839152,0.000059235652,0.0012606997,0.021698609,0.011497201,0.0021008053,0.83791715,0.122023806,0.00008975308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011313014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016615401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017522572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030344604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022771626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061585724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523956693","doi":"","title":"Acte fondateur ou loi ordinaire? La Charte des droits et libertés de la personne dans l’ordre juridique québécois","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international (RQDI)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035686281021801804,"score_gpt":0.3189085013754637,"score_spread":0.2832222203536619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523956693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12637219,0.007891483,0.0035246962,0.072497405,0.0010400686,0.00006578427,0.00046034687,0.0000943065,0.7880537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80942476,0.0018159332,0.00093940704,0.0029679865,0.00009921223,0.000049466773,0.00010761223,0.000054230157,0.18454131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987478,0.00028703522,0.00002145793,0.00017091341,0.0002771644,0.0004955977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.00014740169,0.000065031236,0.000051700143,0.00033514362,0.00025819126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012166249,0.0002966795,0.00029017578,0.001047414,0.012355508,0.007220868,0.0009624665,0.0013860059,0.010361554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018861495,0.00017737351,0.00016037477,0.0012595113,0.013740118,0.002303906,0.0014541827,0.0030540237,0.00060918275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027715827,0.000007993913,0.0028226397,0.000045066197,0.000006304545,0.00011335996,0.043677926,0.000165267,0.00024400714,0.9040501,0.032061007,0.016778639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015372949,0.00001963764,0.02274828,0.0003675634,0.000017102906,0.000073944364,0.050293177,0.00040132942,0.00035241104,0.023340335,0.90230364,0.000067189336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95645386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9787508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95645386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052359737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058451418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37989825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525048104","doi":"10.7202/1067978ar","title":"COMMENTAIRES SUR LES DIFFICULTÉS CONCEPTUELLES QUE POSE LE RECOURS EN DIFFAMATION DANS LES ARRÊTS PRUD’HOMME ET BOU MALHAB : L’ABSENCE DE RECOURS POUR ATTEINTE À LA RÉPUTATION EN DROIT QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Québécois du P.E.N. International","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.034079194963019005,"score_gpt":0.29864429568713746,"score_spread":0.26456510072411843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525048104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18333441,0.014811083,0.006303023,0.47905448,0.0024976428,0.00007411281,0.0007819543,0.000101954894,0.3130414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87798387,0.0044756117,0.0017046124,0.026341125,0.0005059697,0.00006442877,0.00014111014,0.000106387095,0.088676915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585116,0.0013607899,0.00012379249,0.0005081383,0.001131343,0.0010246949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924355,0.0031367172,0.0006432309,0.00028841948,0.0028557724,0.0006402987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006704241,0.0006580618,0.00047871735,0.0016749534,0.02240304,0.010175934,0.0022994997,0.006193844,0.010744576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01164003,0.00032343587,0.00048204494,0.0026367153,0.022416104,0.0057923,0.0028140214,0.009274864,0.000879703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006492203,0.000018058,0.00610152,0.00014186307,0.000022562901,0.000861718,0.24736781,0.00028784634,0.0003253068,0.6348893,0.09770434,0.012214717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025989022,0.000021617405,0.019584343,0.00059287105,0.000031077925,0.00049870095,0.28776327,0.0006107334,0.0005800274,0.043857258,0.6462722,0.00016192705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90316945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9427415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09683055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04632886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029730305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.336141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525175687","doi":"10.7202/1068645ar","title":"LE FORUM NON CONVENIENS AU QUÉBEC, UNE VINGTAINE D’ANNÉES PLUS TARD : ENCORE QUELQUES QUESTIONS NON RÉSOLUES","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Law","score_opus":0.0234641316345461,"score_gpt":0.2850369654265361,"score_spread":0.26157283379199003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525175687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11229613,0.030890863,0.0070616654,0.32041106,0.0041450607,0.00014039106,0.0005323236,0.00009639296,0.52442604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.768577,0.006529237,0.0014974249,0.018829377,0.00046811602,0.000106758234,0.0001702978,0.00006534893,0.20375654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996099,0.0009870289,0.00006665931,0.00054923864,0.0010473643,0.0012507964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613166,0.0010647433,0.00018946352,0.00017438458,0.0015338213,0.0009058051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037644606,0.00039870327,0.00036525613,0.00094627246,0.02240785,0.009483254,0.0015593561,0.0050306306,0.013027889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074514193,0.00024529555,0.00030560495,0.0013201408,0.012079387,0.005045479,0.0026599662,0.005799397,0.00073844194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047355148,0.000029178082,0.001815697,0.000113432376,0.000009205999,0.00035590839,0.0449757,0.00027383113,0.00043532572,0.8158418,0.102110185,0.033992328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020749645,0.000020241803,0.0069638463,0.0003752878,0.000009273888,0.00010249583,0.040358037,0.00043164086,0.0003136091,0.024293032,0.927057,0.000054945474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9420623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96667325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06389615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06389615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08202266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46360117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525597952","doi":"10.7202/1100729ar","title":"LE CONTRÔLE DE LÉGALITÉ DES DÉCISIONS DU CONSEIL DE SÉCURITÉ – UN BILAN APRÈS LES ORDONNANCES LOCKERBIE ET L’ARRÊT TADIC","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04983678606375305,"score_gpt":0.3063957635781011,"score_spread":0.2565589775143481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525597952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09705764,0.0057396423,0.022095408,0.06309358,0.0013389265,0.00017928131,0.00040198665,0.00019619479,0.8098974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73842376,0.002025211,0.005416754,0.005390231,0.0004382066,0.00017067988,0.00019997744,0.00012651125,0.24780862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921286,0.0019554452,0.00029017797,0.0013168887,0.0026957905,0.0016130555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894441,0.0036390445,0.0012125665,0.0009719934,0.0031970434,0.0015352916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008917442,0.00049721514,0.00042272318,0.001472334,0.006249261,0.011957497,0.0015207053,0.0038171962,0.03248316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016080663,0.0005511932,0.0006034382,0.0010756499,0.0067271367,0.0038747727,0.0038708523,0.006778019,0.0029913692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012055385,0.000044024764,0.0049989917,0.00012346626,0.000034255765,0.00016326249,0.0072344043,0.0014372588,0.0010289327,0.92315316,0.023786927,0.037874646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076824654,0.00031537117,0.022273332,0.0007484984,0.00006475772,0.00020789691,0.007234936,0.0023019104,0.0030943407,0.113926224,0.8496233,0.00013262707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08080955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09740912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08080955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011773625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021065785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16067833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525758832","doi":"10.29173/alr239","title":"The Primacy of Expectancy in Estoppel Remedies: An Historical and Empirical Analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Law; Political science; Doctrine","score_opus":0.0971105376908705,"score_gpt":0.39418911143978713,"score_spread":0.29707857374891666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525758832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81447494,0.005949972,0.0030527576,0.004514681,0.000034955105,0.000041544314,0.00016396139,0.000020608748,0.17174663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974873,0.00086647895,0.00012339566,0.00008275738,0.000014632922,0.00000292295,0.000018791157,0.0000029944495,0.0014006069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592626,0.0012449308,0.00024512038,0.00031919943,0.0017492438,0.00051520084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570479,0.026705604,0.0077540427,0.0013080299,0.0061919126,0.0009924506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005479976,0.00009723271,0.00022085954,0.0028329017,0.0024613019,0.0025411244,0.00097566366,0.0010339889,0.004331066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04067059,0.00016665325,0.00016487935,0.0034983016,0.005830492,0.0027499148,0.0013154541,0.0017577609,0.0002701887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019006235,0.00025183707,0.2412327,0.0003269577,0.000051310933,0.0018413299,0.05641385,0.0016724459,0.0007047975,0.5486716,0.00483328,0.14380987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001882585,0.00022576471,0.83314735,0.00067281764,0.00009495703,0.0019127156,0.040488176,0.002035125,0.001749376,0.038542554,0.08101269,0.0000997665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08113999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13560541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08113999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006876655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035268406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16133541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526391125","doi":"","title":"Barreau du Québec et Tribunal des droits de la personne, La Charte des droits et libertés de la personne : pour qui et jusqu’où?, Cowansville (Qc), Yvon Blais, 2005","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04787705781536856,"score_gpt":0.3544702158719009,"score_spread":0.30659315805653237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526391125","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009988718,0.55975264,0.0011474871,0.27307963,0.0061092977,0.00010130745,0.007443596,0.000087025524,0.14229032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26753393,0.20368032,0.0034671912,0.027766755,0.0012282943,0.0002025705,0.0035618274,0.00017601275,0.49238306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987213,0.00019724653,0.00007623337,0.00016055632,0.000543384,0.00030128608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974031,0.00034292525,0.00018753312,0.00008375738,0.0015368061,0.00044592176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016985663,0.0006533428,0.0004751529,0.0023578226,0.009205782,0.0051255277,0.0015390195,0.0031171842,0.02459711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038027288,0.000555165,0.00032643546,0.0051595275,0.0038896736,0.0027065834,0.001262196,0.004417472,0.0015645594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003056399,0.000018933686,0.0042754337,0.00026886354,0.000018627175,0.00015194586,0.0046089403,0.00016064606,0.00017703064,0.03808444,0.89194053,0.06026393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012077495,0.000008480513,0.04353007,0.0008652673,0.000019063404,0.00008071918,0.005469028,0.00008266444,0.00014365002,0.0023234969,0.9474192,0.000046261535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99454087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062356208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062356208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10274821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45242804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528212924","doi":"","title":"Essays in the History of Canadian Law: A Tribute to Peter N. Oliver","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Law; History; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.07328971323882177,"score_gpt":0.2777787014765783,"score_spread":0.20448898823775652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528212924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007319628,0.0834123,0.00043948606,0.79450685,0.02238595,0.000026016147,0.0003376251,0.000045545166,0.09811431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045221172,0.11711241,0.0020400982,0.29261228,0.01814087,0.000077439,0.00035997594,0.00032872113,0.52410704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746966,0.0002793191,0.00006107861,0.00019286945,0.0015454221,0.00045160498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138534,0.0023726285,0.00016923771,0.00016377789,0.0047938037,0.0011151562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031781874,0.0008334661,0.0009098788,0.0037895723,0.018288996,0.008577424,0.0024783385,0.005385814,0.017417185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108656185,0.0006970705,0.0005256873,0.005471635,0.012892261,0.00588292,0.0020011608,0.008531684,0.0024445108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037835844,0.0000028114825,0.00007172197,0.000026840162,0.000001678672,0.000024039504,0.00050999835,0.000025217654,0.0000130147755,0.020347307,0.9739688,0.0050047664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027936344,0.0000012888834,0.0004554542,0.00016240672,0.0000032928394,0.0000239184,0.0011102031,0.000022368149,0.00002628491,0.004947611,0.99323,0.0000142817835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9205883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97336495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048401117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07010951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35117632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528333999","doi":"10.3138/9781442688391-012","title":"10. Fitness to Stand Trial and 10. Criminal Responsibility in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal responsibility; Criminal trial; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law","score_opus":0.051808920004830505,"score_gpt":0.2671148429674839,"score_spread":0.21530592296265338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528333999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005111436,0.029841598,0.0006395159,0.091017984,0.0027653477,0.00010187208,0.00090860913,0.00004436833,0.8695693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08927987,0.01540118,0.0005882045,0.016566887,0.00050351105,0.00009136535,0.00035990952,0.00007408156,0.8771351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969874,0.00023564896,0.0000795421,0.00021036048,0.0011523544,0.0013347011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971621,0.00042252964,0.00008899197,0.000069891175,0.0015302784,0.0007262388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015989314,0.00074688013,0.0005798062,0.002158043,0.016234355,0.0070733535,0.0017360094,0.0097985035,0.035701483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058096997,0.0006605164,0.00058884866,0.0024577652,0.0052414834,0.0023253318,0.0020516405,0.0066488055,0.0037089477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120976865,0.000027294791,0.0010749578,0.00008819542,0.0000046499904,0.00015192744,0.0035465085,0.0002089138,0.000039528233,0.38375,0.57517314,0.035922743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016057464,0.00001133734,0.0072790957,0.00054848456,0.000016015025,0.00011418433,0.004155673,0.0002668369,0.00007795135,0.022385443,0.9650886,0.000040389794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08908849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18712436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6463853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528653986","doi":"10.29173/alr441","title":"To Serve and Protect Whom? Proximity in Cases of Police Failure to Protect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Statutory law; Plaintiff; Duty; Context (archaeology); Duty of care; Law; Order (exchange); Business; Duty to protect; Political science; Common law; Geography","score_opus":0.042174286070996554,"score_gpt":0.3443868178561022,"score_spread":0.30221253178510565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528653986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22424579,0.5375314,0.0019140604,0.12304689,0.0015466822,0.00015578358,0.00019779922,0.000011578768,0.11135012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78944355,0.19661781,0.0005466247,0.009523531,0.00079066516,0.000040949846,0.00011585324,0.0000076718925,0.0029132976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071634,0.0044544553,0.0006670051,0.0006144897,0.002035091,0.0015125034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853173,0.008409804,0.0032675273,0.00041531277,0.0018551453,0.00073502376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010970121,0.0002466565,0.00070276187,0.005608366,0.0044269403,0.0034191099,0.0015707548,0.0047293566,0.0023201175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05249366,0.0004791643,0.00037083583,0.0070134127,0.009091599,0.0046756715,0.0029785198,0.0033511466,0.00031142653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004016646,0.000254952,0.11468512,0.008796046,0.0004929917,0.010201343,0.06547656,0.0014796496,0.0005433617,0.28463694,0.05848777,0.45454362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012601785,0.00038579266,0.3245121,0.022489449,0.000976759,0.012600735,0.17107537,0.00068823603,0.0006879508,0.11814977,0.34808776,0.00022017691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30752128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53412837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6924787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009087927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016980676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6114626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528659496","doi":"10.3138/9781442620810","title":"Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030263439910556033,"score_gpt":0.24741351914116017,"score_spread":0.21715007923060414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528659496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24143042,0.030428927,0.0019270731,0.09779204,0.0011679343,0.00013240622,0.0011116011,0.00006196133,0.6259476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8716144,0.0119815655,0.001080753,0.006962259,0.00013609287,0.000052503012,0.00025128704,0.00007380354,0.10784731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944517,0.00064073544,0.00013361913,0.00039179903,0.0018935517,0.0024885878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948277,0.0013902488,0.00035962998,0.00014149939,0.0023049014,0.00097610656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034587774,0.00078519137,0.0006869461,0.0060930643,0.04297217,0.012490793,0.0040259166,0.0060919384,0.00880667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014902332,0.0007348063,0.00055475405,0.0107132625,0.024071805,0.006288325,0.0050578597,0.0072922492,0.0003483041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074349104,0.00005060681,0.014609117,0.00017284344,0.000022146884,0.0010405717,0.2880732,0.00042459168,0.00018009523,0.49236247,0.10683252,0.096157454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017754,0.000030945073,0.06464732,0.0010936784,0.00008119127,0.0010769435,0.382444,0.00065782014,0.0003632615,0.033707518,0.5156719,0.00020763646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99791735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99945396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17986846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17986846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25746068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95123637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529238904","doi":"","title":"Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expectation of privacy; Charter; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Search and seizure; Privacy law; Power (physics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Privacy policy; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06641061789450314,"score_gpt":0.3639180378415194,"score_spread":0.29750741994701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529238904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06146384,0.012730831,0.004671739,0.110332794,0.00060993433,0.00010272205,0.00022047338,0.00009591153,0.8097718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8542441,0.0026352908,0.0016233915,0.05320067,0.00021576569,0.00010067978,0.000048852577,0.000049836068,0.08788135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564654,0.0008723685,0.00009557192,0.00043374326,0.0012839647,0.0016677493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981748,0.0008495669,0.00009358918,0.00016954861,0.00048220146,0.00023032214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024745916,0.0002864474,0.0004222725,0.00071007805,0.014508044,0.00889315,0.0018227979,0.009743274,0.0031629347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981634,0.0004297888,0.00058943743,0.0006875572,0.018028133,0.0029638868,0.0029528206,0.0075609577,0.00044080854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144489,0.000005151575,0.00023057229,0.0000131562,0.00000325984,0.00030258595,0.002847329,0.00016565138,0.00005214933,0.98131555,0.013050365,0.0019997233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007056775,0.00005631498,0.004170514,0.0009124855,0.0000669021,0.00047340567,0.0139797535,0.0018388248,0.00085853593,0.5373143,0.44012195,0.00013645961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8092948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7998736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19070518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028108936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035895728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3836565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529395944","doi":"10.3138/9781442620889","title":"Canadian State Trials","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0834452761965339,"score_gpt":0.2817166087921418,"score_spread":0.19827133259560786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529395944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009713285,0.011425166,0.00073814305,0.023417233,0.00786422,0.0003345096,0.0077822977,0.00033769666,0.94712955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012256367,0.008127631,0.0009567925,0.0110315615,0.00087868236,0.00031633893,0.0034601083,0.00032353628,0.962649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257314,0.00048291244,0.00027734105,0.00053487904,0.004980163,0.0011515272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98346,0.0022444236,0.00029269655,0.0008078244,0.011489945,0.0017050654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051270844,0.0008237377,0.0007257482,0.0043717697,0.011264905,0.007780017,0.0027365568,0.0036022796,0.14582914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018643893,0.0007303085,0.00066903,0.007729618,0.002307505,0.0021789023,0.0017902708,0.0038429927,0.026912367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104016835,0.0000042558995,0.00006456751,0.00005484039,0.0000019139331,0.000016162734,0.00010227006,0.00004939325,0.000032575754,0.016364068,0.9692881,0.014011339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064819733,0.0000025860365,0.0002797698,0.000046683475,0.0000030827318,0.000008868708,0.0000659817,0.00002580015,0.00003550059,0.00091085845,0.9986077,0.000006698917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93839324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14582914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06221473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16405451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4878471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529611183","doi":"10.71781/1864","title":"Surveillance électronique et métadonnées : vers une nouvelle conception constitutionnelle du droit à la vie privée au Canada?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0078529784796115,"score_gpt":0.20735558828813674,"score_spread":0.19950260980852524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529611183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12489925,0.014232717,0.01894192,0.0809209,0.00055677164,0.00008618338,0.0005155291,0.000101448946,0.7597452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89075655,0.0048854784,0.0027999824,0.0034147387,0.00010110268,0.00003931211,0.0000827216,0.00004325653,0.09787683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975351,0.00040546336,0.000057629913,0.00029112442,0.0011324381,0.00057814847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709964,0.0009004607,0.0002724033,0.00025830994,0.0011665553,0.0003026667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015679522,0.000303324,0.00031663637,0.0017935621,0.010109413,0.010399781,0.0013548506,0.0021591503,0.008809285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047692503,0.00024080837,0.00026174475,0.00262432,0.02127683,0.0046691117,0.0027976006,0.0036188113,0.00034065288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010309205,0.0000049023465,0.0015831989,0.000049635626,0.0000047520834,0.00010694437,0.014214445,0.00016637502,0.00018435101,0.966929,0.0058619464,0.010884109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018216284,0.00004027842,0.023051457,0.00107448,0.0000499646,0.00037687394,0.05176784,0.0012567685,0.0017522965,0.1896136,0.7308702,0.00012787717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9039988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93955594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09600121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04594012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06876872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33332044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529611800","doi":"10.7202/1037538ar","title":"Le projet de loi no 49 et la responsabilité civile en cas de déversement d’hydrocarbures extracôtiers dans le golfe du Saint-Laurent","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.010049775735218014,"score_gpt":0.26938251019474063,"score_spread":0.2593327344595226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529611800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433564,0.00022384601,0.0005358241,0.0023554831,0.000026533475,0.000054857395,0.00033130098,0.000014960549,0.0531008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030656,0.00029479637,0.00072097254,0.00025745181,0.000013467235,0.000049680988,0.00031561815,0.000013573376,0.095268905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910057,0.00016379925,0.000011016048,0.00007876762,0.0002998146,0.00034613028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979079,0.00020753522,0.00026850394,0.00007506427,0.00076051196,0.00078051636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010669058,0.00021333722,0.00011339928,0.0007807412,0.0028477707,0.0016713676,0.0005231293,0.0007414176,0.0073261377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013654812,0.00015618342,0.00022174385,0.00064897106,0.0018165999,0.0004913297,0.0013515475,0.0006908107,0.0004390282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006850555,0.0005710655,0.7073043,0.00029170024,0.000108651904,0.003138443,0.06161169,0.0061706766,0.015976898,0.03532399,0.02087566,0.14794175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016520748,0.0002454885,0.8687466,0.0001216461,0.000017838094,0.00013513146,0.030566566,0.00086022395,0.0017997685,0.0008879672,0.09656617,0.000036257727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8028259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9483961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19717407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018898915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02671532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39667052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529761178","doi":"10.3138/9781442684119-007","title":"5. Reform of the Trial Courts in Quebec","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06122229047586671,"score_gpt":0.2800538037000476,"score_spread":0.2188315132241809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529761178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035469513,0.040369023,0.0018649024,0.14306517,0.0029109563,0.00026928762,0.0013363705,0.000091796384,0.77462304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31238407,0.008829265,0.0015882411,0.031551626,0.00043716136,0.00015981558,0.0002478922,0.000047150566,0.64475477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741685,0.0005635955,0.000069635826,0.0001728161,0.0006468097,0.0011302012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.00037153254,0.00007055271,0.000088653076,0.0010032766,0.00027602803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020624667,0.00044651344,0.00043362656,0.0013377289,0.0161475,0.009032824,0.0019173613,0.008404434,0.016897105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057619917,0.00047001816,0.00056387635,0.0019870338,0.003769428,0.0019526818,0.0012672197,0.0049262913,0.0007191882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033864817,0.000037134778,0.0013047231,0.00010748296,0.000013029244,0.00029690703,0.0030001064,0.0010346859,0.00016631864,0.82303256,0.15037124,0.020602053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006549891,0.000037877217,0.010155911,0.0005379766,0.00003919569,0.000089070025,0.0031772605,0.0015134389,0.00039010594,0.038715355,0.94519347,0.00008489708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9243117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07568828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13943419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54915947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529801733","doi":"10.7202/1068711ar","title":"BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES DROITS DES ENFANTS, CONNAÎTRE LES DROITS DE L’ENFANT : COMPRENDRE LA CONVENTION RELATIVE AUX DROITS DE L’ENFANT AU QUÉBEC, MONTRÉAL, LA COURTE ÉCHELLE, 2009","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Humanities; International law; Law; Art","score_opus":0.025591400024010075,"score_gpt":0.3169289891458682,"score_spread":0.29133758912185814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529801733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017850462,0.1787875,0.0038787075,0.36512506,0.014364523,0.00091005804,0.02260081,0.00049522996,0.39598778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16012076,0.057807684,0.0128968,0.10553996,0.0018406152,0.0011958976,0.0065719252,0.00041134257,0.65361494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932894,0.0006464165,0.00051219366,0.00067296345,0.003014943,0.0018640041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910794,0.0013510084,0.0004796165,0.00026340707,0.005714856,0.0011116728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006352051,0.001336884,0.00077982334,0.00270378,0.008939391,0.007180644,0.005811278,0.010716477,0.012806255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122702755,0.001024365,0.0009169889,0.0050872387,0.004315075,0.0031838936,0.0024123725,0.012762437,0.0020827597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006648376,0.000052253323,0.004396524,0.00030292722,0.00003423355,0.00034492722,0.0037397835,0.00026806552,0.0007448158,0.06361204,0.9055073,0.020930743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042046988,0.000023483066,0.03404386,0.0005665673,0.00004902256,0.000076258904,0.0022909134,0.00014490551,0.00067396293,0.0019996837,0.95996094,0.00012840184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99241287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99541485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08147328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08147328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15671614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5911328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531591372","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1437","title":"The Ideal Victim, the Hysterical Complainant, and the Disclosure of Confidential Records: The Implications of the Charter for Sexual Assault Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Compromise; Charter","score_opus":0.042410411089898396,"score_gpt":0.3055980323655133,"score_spread":0.2631876212756149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531591372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09474733,0.017303158,0.014178101,0.33422437,0.001403893,0.00013711791,0.00016509084,0.0001071649,0.5377338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93853974,0.007685184,0.004232884,0.015934477,0.0006028446,0.000066296874,0.000039718365,0.000039288214,0.03285958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913613,0.0023567,0.00023406434,0.0005205524,0.004011945,0.0015153699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991954,0.0053058867,0.000608892,0.00047535927,0.0012412089,0.0004147235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007665852,0.00027972198,0.00029201913,0.0017891113,0.013472523,0.016428323,0.0024665126,0.0065192124,0.0022533669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013231561,0.00036147202,0.0003287052,0.0017750807,0.07001962,0.0051921704,0.0047311345,0.005860672,0.0002297585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005874701,0.000004507314,0.00031539195,0.000018353654,9.4288873e-7,0.00027477456,0.01533149,0.00009096845,0.00007430033,0.9754533,0.0036381434,0.004791845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039517538,0.000055280634,0.0051169256,0.0009726553,0.000041088762,0.001172828,0.09537227,0.001482809,0.0011087081,0.40296113,0.49150327,0.00017356439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79189366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7742268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20810634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04033536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07546234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4186638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535502015","doi":"","title":"Droit de la preuve appliqué au commerce électronique au Canada: droit civil / common law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.005659001118924552,"score_gpt":0.1922600511559521,"score_spread":0.18660105003702754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535502015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4263598,0.013676863,0.012170766,0.027718237,0.00029840952,0.00023661906,0.001696958,0.00019157291,0.5176509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92388105,0.0036068026,0.0036458385,0.0009346576,0.000036789344,0.000029249544,0.0002926912,0.000051646213,0.06752128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937028,0.00072525186,0.00022257595,0.00045180708,0.0036890528,0.001208484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869092,0.0035881046,0.0012013075,0.00079364865,0.006848896,0.0006588328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003323715,0.0003338518,0.00041741485,0.0050437893,0.010504495,0.012807781,0.0009913964,0.0011546039,0.010652993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014641893,0.00025926056,0.0003208683,0.0107793035,0.00886225,0.0033724415,0.0026948457,0.0016070703,0.0005507499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017747347,0.00004700373,0.09165234,0.00055703684,0.00007484889,0.0009711514,0.08196581,0.0016866003,0.0022765023,0.5819196,0.02299264,0.21567887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001629176,0.00006691315,0.32505298,0.0008726088,0.00010488655,0.0005931143,0.09339313,0.0014940512,0.00455478,0.039842162,0.5338416,0.00016750932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9417539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96508116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058246076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057226818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071025044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41521162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536284630","doi":"","title":"La légitimité des modes amiables de prévention et de règlement des différends à l’ère du nouveau Code de procédure civile du Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouveaux cahiers du socialisme","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018175849684024865,"score_gpt":0.2923270333366779,"score_spread":0.27415118365265306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536284630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44151813,0.0058873678,0.030709963,0.16166289,0.0009842068,0.00028257127,0.0012176493,0.00033852298,0.35739872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97282255,0.0005402257,0.00416786,0.0019435908,0.00022248617,0.00009629357,0.00009093126,0.00004021673,0.0200759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9377161,0.025126366,0.0022127805,0.0049444563,0.023684986,0.006315293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66718924,0.23840679,0.0121099055,0.025012651,0.050855707,0.0064256187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061561525,0.0006652073,0.000979047,0.005011485,0.008973878,0.016096892,0.0033842719,0.008686672,0.012012036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20956402,0.0011492311,0.0010664638,0.0028472696,0.018491581,0.005941458,0.0041638175,0.009841921,0.0010236972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039681693,0.00015545476,0.056932252,0.00017705234,0.00015167837,0.0003305011,0.010352009,0.0022864048,0.0007596605,0.84963787,0.0147844,0.06403593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009683581,0.00060612604,0.26029965,0.0027121366,0.0006972531,0.0010564601,0.023012359,0.045854572,0.005818957,0.35051048,0.3078739,0.0005898145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7418346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69618696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25816542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039810475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060715213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5193716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538167768","doi":"10.29173/alr451","title":"Alberta's Statutory Privacy Regime and its Impact on the Workplace","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Business; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Labour law; Privacy law; Public relations; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04004848864388003,"score_gpt":0.35439093381180903,"score_spread":0.314342445167929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538167768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032214653,0.28897008,0.0016527245,0.13261047,0.0022856263,0.0001020755,0.0003197634,0.00009208087,0.5417526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60315704,0.17805709,0.003136792,0.09075629,0.0015326457,0.00014512347,0.00038754658,0.000044021934,0.1227834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831149,0.0034111603,0.00046141507,0.00094480684,0.010033533,0.0020341694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844902,0.010679905,0.0011159293,0.00050389516,0.0027142658,0.0004956227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00867139,0.00033513538,0.0005447416,0.0061735427,0.0071648373,0.008917555,0.0029430953,0.009462502,0.004132088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016511373,0.00061682815,0.00066884607,0.007883876,0.013062343,0.0022507324,0.0023914294,0.0055902726,0.00046487816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037344034,0.000062055165,0.0036145048,0.0005237866,0.000030116662,0.00062891986,0.003128193,0.00066014024,0.00032829406,0.84912616,0.050683208,0.09117737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000382631,0.00011031144,0.041211165,0.0039453465,0.00014503817,0.00045275464,0.0036827018,0.0005235208,0.00063979375,0.0701453,0.8789984,0.00010753311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7697956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8051476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2302044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040959224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0632178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46312022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538751486","doi":"","title":"Ontario’s Green Energy and Green Economy Act: Why a Well-Intentioned Law is Mired in Controversy and Opposed by Rural Communities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable energy law and policy review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy (signal processing); Natural resource economics; Political science; Energy law; Economy; Economics; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Environmental law","score_opus":0.033756444204371315,"score_gpt":0.30446141338821164,"score_spread":0.27070496918384035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538751486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03308009,0.011530081,0.00040107899,0.8511895,0.0019805974,0.00012168388,0.0009056634,0.000039801944,0.10075147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48574668,0.012394942,0.0021019394,0.4230793,0.0010340342,0.00020986043,0.00049554725,0.00010070952,0.07483704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869414,0.0019386932,0.00058246386,0.0006936315,0.007802881,0.0020409422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9355868,0.03148862,0.0035589368,0.001310672,0.022137575,0.0059173373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012497789,0.00028851096,0.0005416266,0.0022721177,0.016953634,0.008108232,0.0026226728,0.01246639,0.0053879214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051540412,0.000614532,0.00064208737,0.0034615842,0.014509053,0.0029046088,0.0024776242,0.009708678,0.00046687655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013540327,0.00006610442,0.02074516,0.0009593645,0.0001535289,0.0005595064,0.017085811,0.00022842962,0.0006157624,0.25287715,0.66869235,0.03788145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014521663,0.000036974325,0.07089092,0.0020525716,0.00025123532,0.00011352719,0.021081561,0.00028403933,0.0005375535,0.02570331,0.8787641,0.00013896011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071921416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071921416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2901832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52182883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539311535","doi":"10.29173/alr455","title":"Who Controls the Past Now Controls the Future: Counter-Terrorism, Data Mining and Privacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Counter terrorism; Charter; Politics; Computer security; Internet privacy; Business; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04947851111280584,"score_gpt":0.34041903120508055,"score_spread":0.2909405200922747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539311535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034591255,0.6059352,0.001370865,0.34127018,0.001725951,0.000023419836,0.00003692942,0.000009131568,0.046169136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22631459,0.6087128,0.0019891302,0.14491433,0.0042263838,0.00007119952,0.0000692725,0.000020723348,0.0136816045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98440856,0.010040213,0.00053274346,0.00081028335,0.0034467317,0.0007614608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706627,0.02340887,0.0022420418,0.0005217922,0.0025705895,0.0005940389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013256917,0.0003424805,0.0007222635,0.0038202892,0.003484335,0.008562871,0.0012501945,0.00883535,0.002432361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026776154,0.0004277868,0.00040701905,0.004334868,0.021348296,0.008124209,0.0019484403,0.0059596337,0.00051589054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031682288,0.000049085374,0.0023657628,0.0013863359,0.000083862215,0.00026693149,0.0020978656,0.00038055185,0.00009400599,0.8106731,0.07234328,0.110227525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003289696,0.00007775806,0.0075233104,0.010079503,0.00011702885,0.00035134668,0.005304557,0.0003472646,0.00016615509,0.5018888,0.47405082,0.000060648727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055800434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08213932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055800434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009434341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01958634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110951304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548911607","doi":"","title":"Minding the Gap: Why and How Nova Scotia Should Enact a New Cyber-safety Act — Case Comment on Crouch v. Snell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; Computer security; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Aeronautics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.07372683352904794,"score_gpt":0.3096898517758798,"score_spread":0.23596301824683188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548911607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03197843,0.0012906981,0.0005090529,0.92372996,0.0037778104,0.00008132264,0.00029462425,0.000060930677,0.038277153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09910323,0.0007009553,0.00052685983,0.86813664,0.0007373722,0.000044761797,0.000068169014,0.000040247844,0.030641735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957889,0.00058612606,0.00028482237,0.0005830858,0.0010224052,0.0017347669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872825,0.006440407,0.0006891878,0.00040587425,0.0028183335,0.0023636413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005108,0.0004904362,0.000659752,0.0008767825,0.020209892,0.0070895012,0.004127423,0.044056673,0.0047452087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019979713,0.0009999761,0.0012331317,0.00093766337,0.007256922,0.0027476703,0.0033643737,0.035616074,0.0012640806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022778027,0.00007933836,0.015739813,0.00017389897,0.0001053034,0.0052175117,0.015892796,0.0005504758,0.0021380568,0.07238816,0.8771729,0.010314003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020166705,0.00018546681,0.04112621,0.0010898359,0.00032197274,0.002230643,0.040781897,0.0019240223,0.0035221458,0.01689289,0.89107114,0.0006521083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8679499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94216144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1320501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01785026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055077523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26565552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549338198","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2997","title":"Equality Before the Law? Evaluating Criminal Case Outcomes in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Adjudication; Conviction; Premise; Normative; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Representation (politics); Criminal justice; Criminal Conviction; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.10838694095173472,"score_gpt":0.3910181827780401,"score_spread":0.2826312418263054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549338198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97755367,0.0009094416,0.00034724802,0.0019054189,0.000029792378,0.00014237569,0.005741137,0.0000146782795,0.013356113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947519,0.00055020995,0.0004810768,0.00018238583,0.000007981586,0.0000330884,0.0025371101,0.000010187266,0.001446185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970355,0.00032155606,0.00018816866,0.00025486812,0.0012678299,0.0009320795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98655117,0.0010720737,0.002571575,0.00037287013,0.0072650737,0.002167262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031593344,0.00030578184,0.0005296463,0.0042721657,0.0048631784,0.0026665765,0.0021204262,0.0005186514,0.002340501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017057354,0.00028459256,0.00045242405,0.010257864,0.001851654,0.0009240078,0.0020848985,0.0010313621,0.00027641474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008682056,0.00007086229,0.96249014,0.00008371458,0.000081491715,0.000139765,0.005674095,0.00035566618,0.00012927088,0.0017476735,0.0062407935,0.02289958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006482413,0.0000196654,0.9878249,0.000096365155,0.00003348759,0.000041697134,0.0068570585,0.0004970132,0.00012867455,0.00026306216,0.0042096265,0.000021993663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99752647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07755758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07755758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09735235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56272227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550209800","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869613","title":"Code is Law, But Law is Increasingly Determining the Ethics of Code: A Comment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0502243919787117,"score_gpt":0.3533770688665483,"score_spread":0.3031526768878366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550209800","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004990242,0.000448696,0.00028888055,0.99224514,0.0022098653,0.000004447828,0.000032143384,0.000008538075,0.004263238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014593367,0.00071152946,0.0005145013,0.9723306,0.0067244247,0.000028971988,0.000028627164,0.000043514177,0.0050244513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756739,0.0062158317,0.0016774696,0.0061318018,0.0078064613,0.0024945738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82560045,0.1355936,0.004367942,0.004970704,0.025071418,0.0043959534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021200202,0.0009969268,0.0015648768,0.0018713749,0.015219192,0.009836756,0.0059364834,0.08787219,0.012656348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09947931,0.00096653594,0.0021130112,0.0029600284,0.037208173,0.027186802,0.0059753745,0.08593393,0.0047386307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008264948,0.000029499497,0.00060193124,0.0001592073,0.000026869844,0.00039848223,0.00749238,0.00010426732,0.00041697102,0.29128197,0.6940405,0.0053653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012840691,0.00005143563,0.0018303492,0.0008593462,0.00006599127,0.00049045763,0.010625282,0.00046038677,0.0008639264,0.18721887,0.79719347,0.00021210332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06282155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079032876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08787219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008730569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019985959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124911785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553346101","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter and Criminal Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Arbitrariness; Duty; Discretion; Politics; Panacea (medicine); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Doctrine","score_opus":0.02044072827461811,"score_gpt":0.29721199263953385,"score_spread":0.2767712643649157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553346101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021558326,0.037249215,0.0025403076,0.09524428,0.002045387,0.000082340935,0.0011513644,0.00010090797,0.8400279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7596442,0.058432147,0.005692728,0.017726775,0.000821958,0.00009438258,0.00090952223,0.00016010569,0.1565182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477863,0.0005984425,0.00010018494,0.00041361796,0.00280289,0.00130623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421823,0.000917436,0.00038422438,0.0001874513,0.003423198,0.00086939614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029501433,0.0005242025,0.00042986503,0.0045634746,0.017960826,0.008592636,0.0014392957,0.0020034858,0.01831151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010657733,0.00034287627,0.0004095737,0.0071501476,0.012119033,0.0028235028,0.002790007,0.002765796,0.0007696119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016252647,0.000008200605,0.0022889161,0.000119187156,0.000006324355,0.00009440681,0.0032456692,0.00036285399,0.000054708547,0.86236084,0.09583806,0.03560464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001477411,0.0000146293905,0.017624639,0.00065077835,0.000023624278,0.00010808451,0.0050599985,0.00050513877,0.00009784589,0.052562386,0.9232352,0.0001028923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15258633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15258633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20079307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98287976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553369501","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869304","title":"A Comparative Overview of Victimss Rights, Enforcement Mechanisms and Redress (2013) in England and Wales and the American Federal Jurisdiction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Jurisdiction; Download; Enforcement; Political science; New england; Internet privacy; Business; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023326895805446737,"score_gpt":0.31385792070632323,"score_spread":0.2905310249008765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553369501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.950104,0.025066841,0.0002446687,0.0030301344,0.00008411595,0.000050791317,0.001123458,0.000007194376,0.020288846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717092,0.016355671,0.00028102266,0.0010312692,0.000057161866,0.000049442016,0.0005837228,0.000010783492,0.009921712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982364,0.00039177501,0.00019137084,0.0001225278,0.00030960995,0.0007482924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969484,0.0011294566,0.0008028915,0.00008888326,0.0006490626,0.0003813105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015096967,0.0001532295,0.00049852685,0.0075482554,0.0030101386,0.0029514818,0.0007851865,0.0009990286,0.005044361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040552546,0.0004841681,0.0005170302,0.010768718,0.0018496483,0.002393725,0.0032997036,0.0011242385,0.0003027248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039381674,0.0002197433,0.6155698,0.0029086715,0.000253174,0.0028766165,0.12753855,0.00051801174,0.0014032793,0.07620179,0.01841229,0.15370439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046685104,0.00005847011,0.9084428,0.0006513159,0.000050432223,0.0006453395,0.06668212,0.00007582197,0.00012981927,0.0008827061,0.022348855,0.000027693572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35363016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7503366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35363016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074935677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008362803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7031436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554322188","doi":"","title":"Posturing, Tinkering and Reforming the Law of Negligence - a Canadian Perspective?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Law; Tort reform; Project commissioning; Political science; Law reform; Liability; Common law; Perspective (graphical); Publishing","score_opus":0.04385904964817727,"score_gpt":0.2452122505781492,"score_spread":0.20135320092997191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554322188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012630053,0.041043878,0.0011142113,0.7964684,0.0019302362,0.000047344423,0.00013396311,0.0000490411,0.1465829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7094294,0.08408573,0.0053345216,0.1477128,0.0014589891,0.000062795865,0.00017283784,0.00011425518,0.051628716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859073,0.002187468,0.00032999966,0.00084885326,0.0054174885,0.0053088223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98038805,0.0031888678,0.0008508652,0.00058441143,0.011043994,0.003943867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010267914,0.00076646113,0.0008801415,0.0052761184,0.032370765,0.019777328,0.0045075924,0.014231494,0.008876408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032035552,0.00054395135,0.0006856341,0.0065883826,0.037164636,0.011728876,0.004048445,0.011691555,0.0007189702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005688089,0.000068558926,0.0025949313,0.00033821538,0.000030407466,0.00034513758,0.014921407,0.0006334219,0.0002977002,0.7951778,0.13236454,0.053171042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068065034,0.00005787241,0.0134286,0.0015108961,0.00012633494,0.00036379223,0.055481456,0.000990527,0.0005122478,0.15324783,0.77389365,0.00031868037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18954937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18954937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4297868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94000787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555650109","doi":"","title":"Criminal Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Charter; Law; Legislation; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Politics","score_opus":0.027377853820953497,"score_gpt":0.29373267886491566,"score_spread":0.2663548250439622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555650109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027191618,0.016000163,0.003609538,0.13989097,0.0011940324,0.000109108994,0.00073345285,0.000090488094,0.81118053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85981756,0.015096836,0.0060562934,0.016515927,0.00043555998,0.00006619033,0.0003720706,0.00011293015,0.1015267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875894,0.001462369,0.0002465993,0.0009546613,0.00629656,0.0034504177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919961,0.0013986257,0.00048173958,0.000355139,0.00418039,0.0015878824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00426408,0.0004312283,0.0005098391,0.0033467282,0.023782292,0.014580037,0.0014621796,0.003068865,0.0073622246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013200319,0.00046830933,0.00041500057,0.004368828,0.030631041,0.0040226863,0.003679963,0.0064491294,0.0005166602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007405342,0.0000066101584,0.0009771938,0.000037072856,0.0000035068774,0.00006898349,0.0044736573,0.00018133696,0.000056549034,0.9509579,0.029374553,0.013855143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022034477,0.000014687536,0.015264229,0.0004877142,0.000021826338,0.00012042074,0.006806335,0.00055812876,0.00019865631,0.1208034,0.8555968,0.000105652674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99300814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83202946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16797057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26745516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557202064","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1323","title":"Towards a Public Law of Privacy: Meeting the Big Data Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law enforcement; Jurisprudence; Privacy law; Information privacy law; Law; Information privacy; Political science; Data Protection Act 1998; Supreme court; State (computer science); Privacy laws of the United States; Relevance (law); Privacy by Design; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.4180145909454242,"score_gpt":0.4069288338756114,"score_spread":0.011085757069812796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557202064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069317124,0.008232472,0.102138884,0.8344996,0.0015815785,0.00008886284,0.00027980833,0.00017006489,0.046077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6275103,0.01978341,0.12708148,0.18946764,0.017997408,0.0009317887,0.0007628595,0.0005684856,0.015896598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93545336,0.036228165,0.0022498823,0.0057328898,0.017337888,0.002997834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8020926,0.15017183,0.005898082,0.027293883,0.009578488,0.004965002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09811029,0.00074038847,0.0024291142,0.0036006693,0.011379613,0.03456457,0.005847227,0.02105968,0.0031526245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11277472,0.0013685713,0.0020643412,0.0052645192,0.06413592,0.07779372,0.018065052,0.046206273,0.0010554167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074422105,0.000018742914,0.00017927743,0.00003918575,0.000008421243,0.000040172476,0.00093716144,0.00033629124,0.000039785453,0.9876217,0.005886906,0.00488495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001097126,0.000006686072,0.000081821905,0.00010268847,0.0000044664666,0.00003098462,0.00061918027,0.000787178,0.00008169607,0.97254205,0.025720635,0.000011644548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061924034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043677576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09811029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011550171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026865179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51886296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559824207","doi":"10.71781/2138","title":"La protection de l'environnement par les sanctions administratives pécuniaires au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; China Scholarship Council; Hydro-Québec; Government of Canada; Autorité des Marchés Financiers","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020596512412398262,"score_gpt":0.23652303697195118,"score_spread":0.2159265245595529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559824207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15517448,0.0076038875,0.010136709,0.038268458,0.0013253741,0.00066859735,0.0047925664,0.00030620195,0.7817237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44204062,0.002566526,0.0051514246,0.0064610657,0.00012889516,0.00030727606,0.0012444211,0.000083788924,0.54201597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617875,0.00043086757,0.000121291065,0.00046162878,0.0015006879,0.001306839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945692,0.00056435814,0.00024919573,0.00038167796,0.0033566097,0.00087896636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025164962,0.00042814662,0.00036064797,0.0011515772,0.0074099093,0.0051829102,0.0012011371,0.002188899,0.01576336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00500134,0.00046418005,0.00048599517,0.0015862377,0.0029106848,0.000949209,0.0015375869,0.003595319,0.0012344692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018882629,0.00020468497,0.038014714,0.00055536407,0.00009052488,0.0008500405,0.0136372745,0.0053982805,0.0041740546,0.5672948,0.23041287,0.13917857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000614443,0.00007625638,0.097727515,0.00041733158,0.000047664445,0.00010154198,0.0026050287,0.0010505882,0.0011871087,0.0036863468,0.89291626,0.00012298104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98450965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05830535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05830535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.154022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42303693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561087","doi":"10.29173/alr177","title":"What has Dunsmuir Taught?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05356113111974656,"score_gpt":0.3567823824491154,"score_spread":0.30322125132936883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012745227,0.05776847,0.0006581612,0.91229886,0.009482701,0.0000059618383,0.00004070142,0.00002747925,0.018443106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072519735,0.060119044,0.0029996359,0.80570525,0.012341539,0.000045318233,0.000055381795,0.00008664537,0.046127465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952824,0.0035777974,0.00037491508,0.002034164,0.0032909631,0.0011939077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98046106,0.010307525,0.000803657,0.0010330325,0.0049202177,0.0024744961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107312435,0.00039260258,0.0007768858,0.0019026144,0.009035637,0.012083667,0.0023573718,0.015171498,0.0069390223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035285786,0.0004639801,0.0004896921,0.0015752623,0.017765757,0.009606149,0.0027014604,0.012571186,0.001665036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050206512,0.00005969846,0.0019663994,0.00021923886,0.000017226193,0.00024212524,0.0031661906,0.000092935574,0.00010507856,0.35682243,0.5296881,0.107570365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010954684,0.000023525268,0.0012370799,0.00069792307,0.0000063297357,0.00016652707,0.001376386,0.000102801394,0.000153546,0.035914585,0.96028113,0.000029149596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24859348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23952784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24859348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025869098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025629828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49429303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562298834","doi":"","title":"Ответственность за убийство по уголовному кодексу Канады","year":2008,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.11263651762826267,"score_gpt":0.3457000944602312,"score_spread":0.23306357683196854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562298834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05495935,0.018758016,0.11184971,0.028526917,0.0012931862,0.00038489103,0.00066752225,0.00039617374,0.78316426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80033505,0.012288022,0.12137145,0.0015188754,0.00040693113,0.00029443152,0.00020017411,0.00017647486,0.06340861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345434,0.0009927831,0.00025149866,0.0005050725,0.0042216186,0.0005746571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507374,0.0018613634,0.00047341193,0.00053847156,0.001741023,0.00031203812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038963028,0.0004445045,0.00037113222,0.0031285882,0.0054235216,0.0063313604,0.0009422563,0.0013237227,0.0093440665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010003989,0.0005004477,0.00051608606,0.0029939474,0.008610743,0.0020131788,0.0015769753,0.0024958574,0.0020977177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018810395,0.000020873218,0.0013496043,0.00016271722,0.000015660835,0.0005597122,0.004697512,0.00046018406,0.0015413825,0.8860986,0.006498489,0.09857645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028724102,0.00004859066,0.010276971,0.000567872,0.00008587586,0.0016503456,0.0069065248,0.0012264748,0.0044794763,0.47110394,0.5034862,0.00013904375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18610337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34912273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81389666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009033861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02125506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37004024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563272628","doi":"10.21991/c9t96s","title":"Trial Lawyers of British Columbia v British Columbia: Section 96 Comes to the Access to Civil Justice Debate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Autonomy; Habeas corpus; Sociology","score_opus":0.034974618822124756,"score_gpt":0.30304966708798214,"score_spread":0.2680750482658574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563272628","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04306893,0.022828462,0.00069986685,0.48167643,0.002907968,0.0000932814,0.00061056507,0.00008724452,0.44802728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.469829,0.007902912,0.00064070785,0.28208816,0.0011513866,0.00012623375,0.0002467427,0.00012407346,0.2378908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900776,0.0011501447,0.00037565178,0.0011388122,0.0035204699,0.0037372436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855843,0.00755919,0.0003628257,0.00041377672,0.0032195735,0.0028602306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007861477,0.00044231548,0.00068668206,0.00196233,0.025664888,0.017269583,0.0033562086,0.023378441,0.017909627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02266013,0.0010135391,0.00045993223,0.003073064,0.011593935,0.003792596,0.0029913962,0.018388528,0.0014761674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014871123,0.000082449376,0.007299711,0.0003162492,0.000042238444,0.0019067194,0.011281585,0.00029361036,0.00097235455,0.37962815,0.5494037,0.048624415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001115856,0.000042094878,0.019832054,0.0013042239,0.0000990464,0.00022042007,0.010380632,0.00041022518,0.0006829872,0.031662438,0.9350584,0.00019587338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99092734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07676072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07676072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15106164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55694056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564128943","doi":"","title":"Teisiniai lyginamieji lygtinio paleidimo iš pataisos įstaigų aspektai","year":2006,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Economic Justice; Process (computing); Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.018953986799077033,"score_gpt":0.3008439083473893,"score_spread":0.28188992154831227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564128943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21370405,0.078930385,0.0057058535,0.03709152,0.006234993,0.00017009042,0.0009468846,0.00038180305,0.65683436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6486518,0.040498633,0.0038378306,0.002722181,0.0014954986,0.00014978614,0.0005557508,0.00011544448,0.30197316],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955326,0.00011931909,0.00002697989,0.00010360357,0.00010866251,0.000088206216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995869,0.00012849105,0.000076760785,0.00003017778,0.00009307012,0.00008471109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065908366,0.00034318774,0.00039545735,0.0009926411,0.00249745,0.0043231035,0.0003683522,0.000807304,0.03613991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010060726,0.00019155162,0.00021311764,0.0011124187,0.0011460241,0.0015266336,0.0017409298,0.001274262,0.0056577753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003544766,0.00034141575,0.035075203,0.0022628764,0.0000643514,0.0056851176,0.021145329,0.00048613062,0.0053343973,0.21806383,0.10893299,0.6022538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009007718,0.00006118919,0.027559966,0.00046638955,0.000018457396,0.0027274387,0.007402315,0.0002677831,0.0014465853,0.007870849,0.9521505,0.000019369987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017761649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025793456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03613991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013054854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026724327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120900035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564725354","doi":"","title":"수사와 기소 기능분리의 원칙과 한계","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"경찰학연구","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Filter (signal processing); Public prosecutor; Service (business); Criminology; Business; Sociology; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.07475471664815504,"score_gpt":0.3673692487097122,"score_spread":0.2926145320615572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564725354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09488541,0.003174451,0.006150618,0.010678793,0.0006515348,0.00013781678,0.0006611547,0.00010797934,0.8835522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014469,0.0024920213,0.0043956283,0.0034054113,0.0002533489,0.00009255084,0.0005469879,0.00007793681,0.1872891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978276,0.0005409509,0.00018018264,0.00032831082,0.0007699778,0.00035297163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678767,0.0006240096,0.00042554812,0.00027481114,0.0016763635,0.00021159685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015049558,0.00015917518,0.0001971884,0.0009615563,0.0033128571,0.0030049612,0.0003985013,0.0005209558,0.019931335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041303635,0.000106766034,0.00013001992,0.0014503214,0.0032918777,0.0019748604,0.0011117524,0.00090409047,0.0056662858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008384482,0.000088418274,0.017815754,0.0004266332,0.000022088556,0.0011371776,0.029657733,0.00014588614,0.0018951469,0.7109687,0.07422681,0.16353188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007301246,0.00004388877,0.022116093,0.000189265,0.000010075767,0.00072359695,0.008331438,0.00015828092,0.00067379983,0.013199439,0.9545176,0.000029356752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024136204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034210544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024136204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027093093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039113867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066676974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567059005","doi":"","title":"The accused's right to be present: a key to meaningful participation in the criminal process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Fair trial; Right to a fair trial; Criminal court; Criminal trial; Criminal procedure; Key (lock); Process (computing); International law; Computer security","score_opus":0.13665797964209617,"score_gpt":0.41582747773424333,"score_spread":0.2791694980921472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567059005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09892034,0.011478966,0.029497005,0.2404662,0.0017689422,0.00019313864,0.000066585184,0.00008980573,0.6175191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676129,0.0020859942,0.0038770286,0.008599714,0.00068728527,0.00016802238,0.000018579563,0.000031672065,0.01691875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.978459,0.01279745,0.0010367195,0.001895789,0.0035921144,0.0022189186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715507,0.015961997,0.0032114093,0.0026048548,0.0028256723,0.0038452568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019256355,0.00039848668,0.0010409198,0.0011606098,0.011417575,0.013860956,0.0018106143,0.015719268,0.0064946725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038521644,0.0007028506,0.00063800096,0.0005802717,0.05889783,0.015397954,0.014888791,0.015135604,0.0013894023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036821904,0.0000641785,0.0009216588,0.00009448646,0.000013959074,0.0007627038,0.0265782,0.00008608113,0.00083065784,0.9532441,0.0030575362,0.014309531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082877195,0.00028622927,0.003821881,0.0015871243,0.00009287924,0.0059691733,0.032227688,0.00033909627,0.0022191508,0.7263078,0.22691777,0.0001483776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015834837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020790664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019256355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018259778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077448473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10183853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567143047","doi":"","title":"Lygtinio paleidimo paskirtis baudžiamojoje teisėje","year":2003,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Prison; Law and economics; Generalization; Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03436080647523355,"score_gpt":0.32130157242637053,"score_spread":0.286940765951137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567143047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08129067,0.07103576,0.006158241,0.03447263,0.011240695,0.00014055705,0.0007877807,0.00059590884,0.79427785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27779475,0.039794512,0.0039861416,0.0029851177,0.0018725783,0.0001235528,0.00044047306,0.00032176918,0.6726811],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948764,0.000098582714,0.000029910967,0.000103541446,0.00016450687,0.00011576171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995803,0.00009555358,0.000067771725,0.000030733772,0.00011771845,0.000107860025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005776192,0.00050675374,0.00048356663,0.00092045875,0.002675883,0.0040851412,0.00056972104,0.0011100422,0.052648697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013720883,0.000328882,0.0003322759,0.00054111524,0.0011223006,0.0013422173,0.002401059,0.0021345315,0.015992561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060268125,0.00037554032,0.011782849,0.0025414207,0.000052751268,0.0042463304,0.012614585,0.0013001872,0.00796037,0.23208371,0.27023512,0.45620438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010986661,0.000048938575,0.0050889184,0.00045475105,0.000012565194,0.0016476001,0.0017294008,0.0002516365,0.0009776204,0.004990687,0.9847691,0.000017818014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025573703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00440326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052648697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016100599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028747974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17612743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570247237","doi":"10.5596/c16-021","title":"Medically Assisted Death in Canada – Unsettled (and Unsettling?) Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008527495730996275,"score_gpt":0.2613907718901916,"score_spread":0.25286327615919535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570247237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058721814,0.019944815,0.0012950143,0.70944124,0.0038344401,0.00014231706,0.00088469684,0.00008555045,0.2056501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.548183,0.012915329,0.0022018712,0.38190752,0.0013600356,0.00009350276,0.00041407498,0.00011271209,0.052811887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867055,0.0016392992,0.00064477505,0.001233374,0.0045166453,0.0052603185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676088,0.007928586,0.0016072812,0.0011698919,0.01230326,0.009382227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109679075,0.00040012386,0.00076129136,0.0022589336,0.023996139,0.015411306,0.0052972147,0.016416855,0.006279134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039541088,0.00089105027,0.00094121776,0.0029847368,0.016162818,0.0044104964,0.005105803,0.02004933,0.00043009417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000741727,0.00011573347,0.0132317385,0.000237464,0.000094620744,0.0018291512,0.009936415,0.00057316164,0.00037836496,0.6183099,0.31342804,0.04179129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013790486,0.000069928916,0.04419528,0.003452422,0.00025787152,0.001070656,0.017060203,0.001788212,0.0007135845,0.08271274,0.84801185,0.0005292371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12266704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12266704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3737239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89001584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572592180","doi":"10.32920/29936543","title":"Demonstrations and the Law: Patterns of Law's Negative Effects on the Ground and the Practical Implications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.040538349047345636,"score_gpt":0.3773111344270751,"score_spread":0.33677278537972943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572592180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.827741,0.0014737913,0.0036915885,0.028039305,0.0001585722,0.000063503234,0.00007380863,0.00009721272,0.13866127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659914,0.0002574557,0.00021829901,0.00059240026,0.000017480406,0.000016662687,0.000013058851,0.00003524935,0.0022503866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612785,0.0069142943,0.00027899345,0.001091536,0.003294177,0.0022931907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97335774,0.016737819,0.0035212035,0.0016580827,0.0027758207,0.0019493774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008288415,0.0002869936,0.00047390015,0.0018381043,0.012043351,0.012059817,0.0017508902,0.0017435405,0.004700712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036370456,0.00046232232,0.00029178202,0.0021397949,0.05017497,0.009635791,0.013854603,0.0070177144,0.0002471921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005296018,0.00007225763,0.022054752,0.0001627829,0.000023142173,0.0008588874,0.7560175,0.00024194075,0.000844371,0.17493878,0.0071327863,0.0375998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014584124,0.00008411928,0.03475782,0.0003185762,0.000014669677,0.00022590694,0.877513,0.00036776147,0.00042980872,0.01476554,0.07145448,0.000053837874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16364643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23671344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16364643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015374001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014989303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32538778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573131317","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Research Manual: Ontario Statutes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3445844152168141,"score_gpt":0.5415079563397083,"score_spread":0.19692354112289417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573131317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016869804,0.003743029,0.0074263075,0.013051672,0.0012714912,0.013044517,0.28719398,0.0023358031,0.67024624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065600933,0.007135475,0.028532416,0.0042715785,0.00034104259,0.01947648,0.10821657,0.0014414352,0.8240248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692197,0.0042273677,0.0033290084,0.0014175148,0.019653495,0.0021529123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84925544,0.03010336,0.0042986684,0.009318345,0.102527834,0.0044963257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02791243,0.0016232119,0.0019201904,0.015734991,0.009701249,0.009855764,0.005376754,0.0055956347,0.26714778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10227216,0.0040445128,0.0015667254,0.023913214,0.0045008874,0.005621369,0.0040861596,0.0050192634,0.12967485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006285452,0.000041858675,0.00052140065,0.00054311455,0.0000065890154,0.000016754148,0.0004709923,0.00008260148,0.00010020013,0.008363324,0.9636403,0.026149958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010141954,0.000024826186,0.0064568073,0.00089271285,0.00002283678,0.000021528038,0.00046877586,0.00010551174,0.00019771118,0.003367181,0.988303,0.000037633497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85432833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.950135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06145941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32266867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89369833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575313095","doi":"10.1504/ijhrcs.2016.079632","title":"Monetising constitutional rights: the award of damages in constitutional claims","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Redress; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.06256506241237965,"score_gpt":0.3813605190712536,"score_spread":0.318795456658874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575313095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06229198,0.009230532,0.039167188,0.04103759,0.0009987006,0.0001825197,0.0001290502,0.000078988276,0.8468834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96323186,0.0027913172,0.004865651,0.004241873,0.00087754405,0.0001860829,0.0000320857,0.000037800713,0.023735797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719229,0.010621319,0.0017000422,0.0027533947,0.009978775,0.0030236146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97853756,0.015251972,0.001517734,0.0026184358,0.0014818194,0.00059254805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020638874,0.0005233587,0.0010836739,0.0034684564,0.00768556,0.017016795,0.0029773416,0.013422216,0.0065469397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039286025,0.0008099932,0.0008814508,0.0023678974,0.064683884,0.01740393,0.0113304285,0.011133656,0.00067153893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044548933,0.0000073022734,0.00013826582,0.00001508886,0.0000034208524,0.000064228916,0.0006219156,0.00010262421,0.000066046305,0.99675816,0.00032664958,0.0018918164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022983952,0.00006394588,0.0013429812,0.00031315023,0.000022829305,0.0002983351,0.0012310926,0.0005409688,0.00044598914,0.9453908,0.050282747,0.00004423116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009212407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011364489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020638874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009948031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00790942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10915005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580276317","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttw250","title":"Using Social Insurance numbers for identification purposes: Canadian perspective on legal and privacy risks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Business; Perspective (graphical); Social insurance; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Actuarial science; Finance; Internet privacy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12724727448177497,"score_gpt":0.41775356483750825,"score_spread":0.2905062903557333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580276317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020229874,0.025286693,0.013328003,0.47695455,0.0013555659,0.00015221434,0.00064559665,0.000058349025,0.46198905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81838435,0.050883725,0.014350959,0.06940963,0.0011341029,0.00011914416,0.00033634691,0.0001179862,0.045263786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9556055,0.01204673,0.0017924173,0.0028062905,0.0226426,0.005106501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9160313,0.041480128,0.004377168,0.0036745893,0.030229766,0.004207064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02685906,0.00074818905,0.0009195835,0.008019152,0.01942399,0.021496274,0.004451857,0.013940988,0.0059030885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067897104,0.00082744693,0.0011345948,0.008812496,0.042853314,0.013188957,0.0071312636,0.013490418,0.0006549987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013083655,0.000009983447,0.0012762893,0.000086335334,0.000011433794,0.00039614766,0.010316593,0.00024562606,0.0000808093,0.9614152,0.013469618,0.012678932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024126153,0.000037889182,0.006716063,0.0028665941,0.000091736125,0.00118161,0.03016677,0.0018098316,0.0006351265,0.34192458,0.6141811,0.00036457359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95061404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09834824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09834824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14662236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71356976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581992304","doi":"","title":"Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Separation of powers; Legislature; House of Commons; Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics; Judicial deference; Legislation; Doctrine; Law and economics; Judicial review; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.02276897726288724,"score_gpt":0.30467975851094264,"score_spread":0.2819107812480554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581992304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03949784,0.0033515014,0.015683996,0.046513043,0.00037523167,0.00017092109,0.0003773216,0.000092564835,0.8939375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88332915,0.0025489987,0.008838405,0.015300419,0.000494817,0.0003678499,0.00030127147,0.00019177486,0.088627264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98080826,0.0048463633,0.0008421878,0.002497572,0.006950856,0.00405471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865724,0.007146808,0.0010572925,0.0014451784,0.0028553759,0.00092295976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015942506,0.00038481483,0.00077152625,0.0016653911,0.014316438,0.013686343,0.0024122302,0.004475413,0.011657718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032828446,0.0009317456,0.00048989564,0.0023643,0.029526334,0.0070913876,0.005614656,0.009654794,0.0009788969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056381577,0.0000027229087,0.00019599943,0.000008440308,0.0000020255347,0.000024221552,0.0013433993,0.00006989555,0.000045092893,0.9930923,0.002586254,0.0026239543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000578121,0.000023068857,0.003205067,0.00036599944,0.00003794441,0.00010371313,0.0040084934,0.00085283833,0.00057915424,0.51816016,0.47253767,0.00006808111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46854258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5731637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46854258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033839185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05008628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93163073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W258366820","doi":"","title":"'Denying Justice': Does the Tort of Negligent Investigation Go Far Enough?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Duty; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Conviction; Plaintiff; Political science; Duty of care; Liability","score_opus":0.03543966414883289,"score_gpt":0.30260863191779114,"score_spread":0.26716896776895827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W258366820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007338811,0.013251921,0.0005710075,0.94696075,0.0022292521,0.000012259063,0.000025691064,0.000015583457,0.029594796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2941184,0.016868478,0.0009243357,0.6668007,0.006110963,0.000052747357,0.000053329546,0.000074021256,0.014997098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380846,0.004762516,0.0007242932,0.0016490417,0.0048012096,0.004254553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651667,0.02416722,0.0019529476,0.0010212789,0.0046667107,0.003025188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023134783,0.00053915166,0.0014614905,0.001441192,0.016342634,0.017170375,0.0044964626,0.03852613,0.005792643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07165027,0.0006147074,0.0009851768,0.0013665141,0.07172584,0.020057183,0.004321993,0.033593398,0.0009796405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056351884,0.00008147348,0.0034833997,0.00031309796,0.000028004426,0.0013803081,0.033679157,0.00015487247,0.00014513335,0.7328983,0.17619106,0.0515888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000615454,0.00012075715,0.00912739,0.003539448,0.00008585892,0.001511711,0.06835622,0.000552462,0.00028783493,0.56105965,0.35505614,0.0002409934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3599486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41191033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3599486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021060476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047071125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71570694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586512860","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Research Manual: WestlawNext Canada & Lexis Advance Quicklaw","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20420700723952837,"score_gpt":0.5089320897582671,"score_spread":0.30472508251873875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586512860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011215758,0.0030728937,0.013642555,0.010525987,0.0023946103,0.018677374,0.2736351,0.009130151,0.6677998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031394162,0.004885664,0.03729899,0.0034945928,0.0003828418,0.021471722,0.0843276,0.0044698576,0.8405293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98112774,0.003201574,0.002393453,0.0009998366,0.011096707,0.0011807393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8127605,0.04974486,0.0038858305,0.010074177,0.11799124,0.00554344],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02343776,0.0017203221,0.0024509693,0.017737038,0.008102578,0.010165905,0.004501475,0.0048283814,0.54154724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10490325,0.0042756055,0.0013857017,0.02180333,0.003407865,0.007863914,0.0043419804,0.0065323575,0.38433227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017781565,0.000028924078,0.000096211705,0.00026648203,0.0000015023805,0.000006594374,0.00011070066,0.00003078412,0.00003489206,0.0019280954,0.9732078,0.02427032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080060025,0.000023997654,0.002255369,0.0012263192,0.000011815287,0.000027857921,0.00056027767,0.00012732515,0.00021322623,0.004209491,0.9912237,0.00004052384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38631895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7061753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018193487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14847362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7681407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587453561","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006032","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Law edited by François Tanguay-Renaud and James Stribopoulos Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012. ISBN 978-1-84946-010-1. xii + 321 pp.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Publishing; Law; Subject matter; Queen (butterfly); Index (typography); German; Sociology; Political science; History; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029609670987713454,"score_gpt":0.2849894635113597,"score_spread":0.25537979252364623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587453561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040156688,0.6162864,0.0057737185,0.12538287,0.004964303,0.00004211397,0.00029668308,0.00009583922,0.24314238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18685766,0.6003666,0.00821945,0.01069314,0.0017658117,0.000093553004,0.00036944126,0.00024734423,0.19138694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979296,0.00055460643,0.00006812481,0.00019352617,0.0009101909,0.0003440009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978219,0.000763152,0.00014510122,0.00011185714,0.0007903837,0.00036756415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002735589,0.0014580375,0.0011178326,0.006375645,0.011201869,0.012483055,0.0022122187,0.0029540113,0.010461294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236417,0.00081133883,0.0005272354,0.011785821,0.02908203,0.008582223,0.0031326578,0.0050512175,0.0010720474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011702638,0.0000150720525,0.00047145877,0.00043444478,0.000011446187,0.00016255339,0.019307652,0.00030732667,0.00009257112,0.66570514,0.2445138,0.06896686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004171702,0.000004053182,0.0012052943,0.0009676784,0.000008687761,0.00010461083,0.010455193,0.00021703109,0.000045052708,0.09387466,0.89309174,0.000021862701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8686129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92711776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13138711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08136961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5903806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587900814","doi":"","title":"Loosening the Law's Bite: Law, Fact, and Expert Evidence in R v JA and R v NS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Status quo; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Rules of evidence; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06039795706589633,"score_gpt":0.36650891274634095,"score_spread":0.3061109556804446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587900814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06763158,0.0115017425,0.011849647,0.61212754,0.001903539,0.00010280929,0.00011154033,0.00006405436,0.29470757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8673783,0.0038915975,0.0069304276,0.096693285,0.0014780161,0.00010009545,0.000047593807,0.000081888655,0.023398751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97932065,0.00793463,0.00093986257,0.0017171332,0.0062396144,0.0038480065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96252626,0.029353611,0.0014721235,0.0014615919,0.0035613775,0.0016249826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034149416,0.0004956247,0.0011580284,0.0038783022,0.022816593,0.027981168,0.003768264,0.021731978,0.0028627436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06583549,0.0009738642,0.00081186555,0.0023924843,0.07247748,0.021725064,0.007579379,0.02494836,0.0003399526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015550318,0.000011093605,0.00058600697,0.00003416644,0.000008625195,0.0008551526,0.018898068,0.00012830713,0.00013304502,0.9631177,0.009689183,0.0065230187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041945106,0.00003700859,0.0035171744,0.0010327193,0.000049015376,0.00089055137,0.048120473,0.001086318,0.00064686756,0.685004,0.2593718,0.00020223328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5397478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67558646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5397478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031144433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03498438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588436416","doi":"","title":"Disenfranchisement as Punishment: European Court of Human Rights, UK and Canadian Responses to Prisoner Voting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Voting; European union; European Union law; Convention; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.065308629649263,"score_gpt":0.35823655440416263,"score_spread":0.29292792475489965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588436416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65737045,0.0072887545,0.00038321718,0.14153102,0.00068936206,0.00020448328,0.000666601,0.000016860638,0.19184917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96310645,0.0026447412,0.00021669417,0.018334817,0.000092101254,0.000056515488,0.00016649842,0.00001832453,0.0153638655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753704,0.005948526,0.0010609557,0.0013652263,0.007224362,0.009030409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513058,0.021585343,0.004336003,0.0012757082,0.01700644,0.004490636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01795927,0.00040183944,0.00078755186,0.004438297,0.026535697,0.010857488,0.0033267667,0.008422116,0.008176726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10455833,0.00050748757,0.00054673565,0.008626457,0.011072683,0.0041717794,0.0055226507,0.0076886592,0.00036423624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001104326,0.00027004562,0.107039236,0.0006238576,0.0001839159,0.0027244992,0.33926293,0.0008815024,0.00083097524,0.34483564,0.14267918,0.05956397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002996641,0.00016030246,0.26054737,0.0014693461,0.00027307178,0.00045695825,0.36737773,0.001229707,0.0011453738,0.014215657,0.35233802,0.00048689573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13440385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13440385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101549394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97517276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588661555","doi":"","title":"The Evolution and Reform of Summary Trials in Canadian Military Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015243780546323565,"score_gpt":0.2543765170753396,"score_spread":0.23913273652901604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588661555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23146383,0.019034715,0.010195252,0.3161925,0.0020756286,0.0012463757,0.0021518434,0.00038732035,0.4172526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247666,0.0035121741,0.005017835,0.014205624,0.00046065,0.00024619643,0.00036851538,0.0001833428,0.051239006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9381053,0.018203072,0.0029527515,0.005386601,0.01854969,0.016802482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81465733,0.06298624,0.0076185665,0.009311099,0.08499936,0.020427413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058396593,0.00047596477,0.0012503994,0.008143945,0.02960604,0.02967026,0.0061910124,0.008257634,0.013415746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24327843,0.0013909804,0.0007010651,0.014867001,0.02693659,0.0068954155,0.0067397943,0.009534339,0.00091153354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028780696,0.00010316336,0.013208494,0.0004014053,0.00007805544,0.00031290078,0.027085269,0.0038008331,0.00066740776,0.7365404,0.068548016,0.1489663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020705439,0.00023155974,0.12027619,0.0016137065,0.00021949157,0.00016029613,0.030804407,0.004472513,0.0015205718,0.08372598,0.7562862,0.00048193033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98158157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99110854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31328493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31328493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43740258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79649216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588787282","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1339","title":"\"Chartering\" in the Shadow of Lochner: Guindon, Goodwin and the Criminal-Administrative Distinction at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Administrative law; Statutory law; Shadow (psychology); State (computer science); Criminal law; Power (physics); Psychology","score_opus":0.054096900128114064,"score_gpt":0.3226209074071395,"score_spread":0.2685240072790254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588787282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011708231,0.3322541,0.0012632547,0.5437792,0.0048329486,0.00008273126,0.00043178446,0.000044044133,0.10560369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51594967,0.1862236,0.00253272,0.22267336,0.0024836452,0.00008863935,0.00024525583,0.00010709836,0.06969593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921442,0.001766681,0.00022081228,0.00084625493,0.004036296,0.0009857359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98487294,0.006548459,0.0006760193,0.0004016543,0.0066678477,0.0008330983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008840208,0.0003840467,0.0007237894,0.0028347634,0.013047493,0.011533324,0.002199934,0.006167855,0.003132564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024545306,0.00039347092,0.00035736783,0.004474461,0.021268379,0.004115593,0.0015644633,0.008295049,0.0002707423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032550583,0.000022354052,0.0016542284,0.00039263218,0.000030847972,0.00029471182,0.0050069606,0.00034964888,0.00017942459,0.58747,0.35690793,0.04765881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003546157,0.000018671526,0.010882968,0.002758549,0.00008814797,0.00011717468,0.005810888,0.00030275405,0.000454766,0.0673875,0.91200936,0.0001338141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07151565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07151565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17895791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5188848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588847849","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4376","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 225 RE-EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE: THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF CROWN-POLICE ALIGNMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Plea; Windsor; Warrant; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.15238276535311923,"score_gpt":0.44048746539275985,"score_spread":0.2881047000396406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588847849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019390954,0.006500349,0.0020036264,0.06423252,0.0017379228,0.000056624798,0.00045452532,0.00029723652,0.9053263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21032394,0.0037921173,0.0022347935,0.010948657,0.00083390623,0.000036670466,0.00026557196,0.00017856502,0.7713856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789494,0.00040888716,0.000112918955,0.00027892087,0.0008567145,0.00044760428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800974,0.00035737915,0.00015540454,0.00025216158,0.000779943,0.0004454137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021350891,0.00026290902,0.0002075652,0.0009048596,0.0070486106,0.01079638,0.0006726374,0.0043481253,0.060335323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058405646,0.00037882238,0.00029832343,0.0010241659,0.004949277,0.0029056435,0.003009027,0.0023455792,0.008519649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033101136,0.000035460387,0.007914592,0.00011817278,0.000014439414,0.00062429754,0.0043786173,0.00020031445,0.00070507923,0.30775502,0.56508297,0.11313795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008049691,0.000017988881,0.013874957,0.0001815768,0.0000109275215,0.0001720834,0.0030687281,0.00026742704,0.00034155737,0.015334579,0.9666936,0.000028506483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3841008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6508229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3841008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009318936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01219438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76373017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590945711","doi":"","title":"Telus: Asking the Right Questions About General Warrants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Statutory law; Law and economics; Law; Limiting; Point (geometry); Political science; Business; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021561184179729388,"score_gpt":0.2988212752063284,"score_spread":0.277260091026599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590945711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010176949,0.0061880453,0.019846005,0.717117,0.0025342554,0.00012082096,0.00028912752,0.0001803714,0.24354744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6167637,0.007012385,0.018699246,0.25751323,0.007111529,0.00030713764,0.00030002452,0.0003630934,0.09192963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857479,0.005500718,0.00094700436,0.0017345197,0.0041860845,0.0018837453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97312206,0.018527305,0.001038675,0.001441306,0.0050026067,0.00086801016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017169675,0.00078375614,0.0012283917,0.0018578474,0.009439072,0.012959384,0.002974655,0.017262068,0.01265462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051905986,0.00083798985,0.0009472855,0.0014250571,0.036211777,0.028732669,0.0052016196,0.019487713,0.0025535356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012961929,0.0000075066905,0.0001514804,0.00003959551,0.0000032826408,0.00015272848,0.0019458957,0.000099414174,0.00010184521,0.9744134,0.018304458,0.004767282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024775698,0.000010568969,0.00020345261,0.00020896057,0.000012095964,0.00010487135,0.00411163,0.00045714562,0.00030003797,0.86891854,0.12561592,0.00003202302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09780329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08286831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09780329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020501276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02109381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19446802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591041822","doi":"","title":"Une malheureuse célébration de la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne par la Cour suprême du Canada: l'arrêt Chaoulli","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0053224407382736335,"score_gpt":0.1929465265155906,"score_spread":0.18762408577731698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591041822","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015437416,0.045049585,0.001610198,0.85705423,0.012333331,0.000029009849,0.00046214962,0.00010390837,0.06792016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36261293,0.030630311,0.0031116952,0.09059922,0.005591469,0.000062003724,0.00023657556,0.0004116781,0.5067441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933416,0.0011518539,0.00011842887,0.00058748724,0.003125476,0.0016751547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906211,0.0024426975,0.00038213588,0.00039898767,0.0043879403,0.0017671334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049711266,0.00065396854,0.00076971017,0.0012312832,0.020875286,0.012740173,0.0015877541,0.008521643,0.010708751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012955713,0.00057041354,0.00055525947,0.0022513084,0.011421597,0.003966808,0.0031900955,0.015872093,0.0011098381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000588464,0.000023841347,0.0019238443,0.00010786598,0.00002217349,0.00024686975,0.016163055,0.0002541745,0.00035151842,0.22808242,0.7202865,0.03247899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068947306,0.0000069880552,0.0041331635,0.0001389357,0.0000071462646,0.00007107981,0.0049761464,0.00014796585,0.00029263785,0.0032482808,0.9869342,0.000036599085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96865976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061721023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061721023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12713325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44781947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591742251","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1472","title":"Distorting the Prosecution Process: Informers, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, and Wrongful Convictions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Law; Prison; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.025094286748516083,"score_gpt":0.315542606470057,"score_spread":0.2904483197215409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591742251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8870596,0.0040801507,0.0035744454,0.037930444,0.00008239148,0.00008204201,0.000051376675,0.000022711352,0.06711682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767286,0.0005195211,0.00033769812,0.00063615246,0.00003342046,0.000013478024,0.0000071916256,0.000003049139,0.0007766208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98123497,0.011127822,0.0009772299,0.0006327563,0.0039873393,0.0020399606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8703302,0.09300643,0.026218377,0.0028125641,0.0051083644,0.0025240013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014838115,0.0002665442,0.00035688982,0.00154337,0.0044675656,0.005670021,0.0010687241,0.0038020532,0.0035715322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13718058,0.00041415144,0.00023835391,0.001058209,0.010972361,0.004661845,0.0049796347,0.0039831134,0.0002886744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009121543,0.0005840733,0.28137186,0.000311335,0.000108706845,0.0060032145,0.19666098,0.0026213822,0.0009788189,0.37476626,0.0053439103,0.13033739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033003007,0.0008707469,0.45099252,0.002329422,0.00044869835,0.006214805,0.23308475,0.0079573365,0.0055275117,0.24825837,0.0436448,0.00034099966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022738574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029152066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022738574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006104215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072110645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078472376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592778477","doi":"","title":"Réflexions venues d'ailleurs: comparaison entre les droits du dommage corporel québécois et français","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gazette du palais: Recueil bimestral","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.03148408365774839,"score_gpt":0.28689284130022785,"score_spread":0.25540875764247944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592778477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82684654,0.018823056,0.001254207,0.022769678,0.00032886965,0.00008098792,0.001912058,0.000045228655,0.12793943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97808677,0.0029704324,0.00039135737,0.0010754279,0.000053129686,0.000034528948,0.00025046585,0.0000348237,0.017103069],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992477,0.0027683803,0.000316936,0.0007778919,0.0022588572,0.0014009755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752118,0.012516622,0.0027944013,0.000979261,0.0070183063,0.0014796988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007044891,0.00057593366,0.00058610976,0.005539936,0.00839112,0.010591759,0.0016011319,0.0017241661,0.014495662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029769966,0.0004214642,0.0005687821,0.010425966,0.008139509,0.004855422,0.0034466165,0.0032679697,0.0005819205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054002914,0.00010751952,0.22587012,0.0010184079,0.0004893535,0.0017818253,0.46102276,0.000530479,0.0011994727,0.14645919,0.025337104,0.13564377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031341013,0.00007592301,0.4771202,0.0017683759,0.00013146775,0.00039931558,0.36129966,0.00027359734,0.00061093445,0.0038677722,0.15431833,0.000103082704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95186573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9633483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048134267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036678746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04148174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2661242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592872947","doi":"","title":"L’Alter Ego Code de procédure civile du Québec : complément jurisprudence et doctrine","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02878190209511188,"score_gpt":0.3306087828680942,"score_spread":0.3018268807729823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592872947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13223183,0.018460324,0.022027466,0.09790839,0.0024433308,0.00029727677,0.0017093105,0.00033091367,0.7245913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.682639,0.0034002073,0.012599753,0.010312318,0.00053045835,0.0001940415,0.00033985847,0.0001039412,0.28988045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325305,0.0013524061,0.00031245343,0.000717556,0.0033191338,0.0010453974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431854,0.0019250169,0.0002564957,0.0005106654,0.002655648,0.00033364765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040531424,0.0005887112,0.00070740294,0.0026378753,0.009149741,0.0086332215,0.0016965137,0.007171879,0.008392817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084005995,0.00066534936,0.0008338562,0.0024633468,0.009510893,0.0017815144,0.0015279113,0.006575487,0.0006440823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003061922,0.00003472041,0.0020923119,0.000058957525,0.000020879974,0.00022234747,0.0021851934,0.0007035519,0.0007003226,0.9423473,0.028502347,0.023101453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097642114,0.00007620005,0.037516963,0.0005001987,0.00007043745,0.00046516213,0.0028876653,0.004049408,0.0016182099,0.08820598,0.86432743,0.00018455728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9624831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.965633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05656538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05656538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079161435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4104125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594526090","doi":"","title":"Self-governing Codifications of English Criminal Law and Empire: The Queensland and Canadian Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Politics; Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.03147503646858546,"score_gpt":0.25830422925128205,"score_spread":0.2268291927826966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594526090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15332629,0.004523283,0.0043548136,0.02039566,0.0002844849,0.00014743829,0.00053956336,0.000070877875,0.81635755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187561,0.0034682485,0.00406937,0.0012209468,0.000062418556,0.00010965762,0.00018072246,0.00008962883,0.07204289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954986,0.0010565013,0.00017578773,0.00024511604,0.0019131332,0.0011109173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951466,0.0016320096,0.00025430403,0.00036288658,0.002287956,0.0003163154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027592161,0.00049556355,0.00043098704,0.0043689795,0.024364758,0.0063236733,0.0018696542,0.002126958,0.0047187363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01111927,0.00038261933,0.00044286708,0.0077964882,0.019950869,0.002525374,0.0034926876,0.0029831452,0.00028465985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001657031,0.000013709197,0.0017604486,0.000069673384,0.000006577964,0.00053465314,0.06142381,0.00058260583,0.00017154377,0.9136412,0.012985804,0.008793375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000340723,0.000026172967,0.023746774,0.00052495557,0.000045993023,0.00084125047,0.076622225,0.0031305782,0.0006089243,0.11736943,0.77686894,0.00018068356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98687965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11192887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11192887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06847829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594803311","doi":"","title":"Moteurs de recherche, déréférencement, oubli et vie privée en droit québécois","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15535014985927173,"score_gpt":0.42733608590397665,"score_spread":0.2719859360447049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594803311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30406862,0.09689365,0.004489923,0.27282727,0.011228414,0.0007944587,0.0355131,0.0003688788,0.27381566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58239293,0.040234968,0.0049883155,0.014608989,0.0022366187,0.000643,0.00609004,0.00019912943,0.34860605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523395,0.0014770015,0.00029011015,0.00048446565,0.001432181,0.0010823284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97903854,0.007470155,0.0017067699,0.0006291056,0.007700186,0.0034551546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007635114,0.00065442617,0.0011782,0.004242564,0.0075320946,0.0062804464,0.0013768892,0.0029595334,0.05018082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025659207,0.00033844777,0.00088354666,0.0063772495,0.0027867507,0.0026699493,0.0015083717,0.0059243985,0.0027619174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009918608,0.0005405248,0.12304135,0.003133062,0.00042443495,0.0029164422,0.040898718,0.002120725,0.0017249006,0.10537743,0.3937166,0.325114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014110061,0.00016490559,0.22640918,0.004964454,0.00011731759,0.0007985679,0.05565753,0.0012539609,0.00091211766,0.004920813,0.704454,0.00020600739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9642977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97244644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05139993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05139993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09199951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37293434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595711559","doi":"","title":"Guides thématiques: Droit canadien et québécois: Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034707715261496845,"score_gpt":0.3373364054441613,"score_spread":0.3026286901826645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595711559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017074095,0.18904084,0.0061822324,0.18400496,0.0070060687,0.00031427297,0.003623176,0.00044558026,0.59230864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12616934,0.03701324,0.007065588,0.012085214,0.0010791371,0.00032869316,0.00092990074,0.0003365473,0.81499237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580824,0.0013952495,0.00027362103,0.00042159698,0.0015663413,0.00053487753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566734,0.0019516399,0.00018377152,0.00022029883,0.0014087493,0.00056822994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005442457,0.001170063,0.0009211733,0.005741848,0.012240791,0.012688499,0.002309705,0.009892761,0.03566828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008662581,0.0007537611,0.00060608145,0.00724186,0.008838783,0.0041666497,0.0025447384,0.009475575,0.0026707824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034739285,0.00006674897,0.0013339994,0.00031917484,0.000017647222,0.00048268223,0.011173606,0.00040924628,0.00033869015,0.49836493,0.41779488,0.06966367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009328583,0.000004901343,0.0019148511,0.00027832913,0.0000058951896,0.00011941415,0.0024486554,0.00011811719,0.00012691607,0.010891609,0.9840576,0.000024300285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9468871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.964217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06682913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06682913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10149953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48488152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596434462","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2016.20740","title":"Étude franco-canadienne du principe légaliste : le processus qualitatif et interprétatif du texte pénal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Legislator; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Legislation; History","score_opus":0.02902429272706703,"score_gpt":0.3096303512717241,"score_spread":0.2806060585446571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596434462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18599021,0.03052024,0.02240375,0.074835025,0.00069710775,0.00012655712,0.0004563011,0.00016088113,0.6848099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750438,0.0027409256,0.002966191,0.00097446766,0.00012366938,0.000043165168,0.000064723245,0.000052098123,0.017990993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819989,0.007852593,0.00043039984,0.0014264,0.006614643,0.0016769668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970462,0.018057156,0.0018552066,0.0015347821,0.007293699,0.0007971614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017941592,0.0005421108,0.00064892345,0.0055136937,0.011553825,0.020854998,0.001405684,0.00347889,0.0038941898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03721774,0.00044818956,0.00047290878,0.005424831,0.036002845,0.007041046,0.0031512098,0.0056489594,0.00053947914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019870993,0.000015700687,0.002740728,0.0000806484,0.000019584464,0.00021479595,0.06330611,0.00018418785,0.0002998733,0.9095563,0.0034580359,0.020104108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038572165,0.000062507024,0.029551528,0.001049411,0.000058589303,0.00097261835,0.068727,0.0014486333,0.0017514846,0.19906871,0.6971076,0.00016328503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6614191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6028828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3385809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049031597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036382083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6811497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596939739","doi":"","title":"The Law Union of Ontario Brief to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-51","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; National security; Public administration; Legislation","score_opus":0.1038717309274204,"score_gpt":0.3356494534749983,"score_spread":0.2317777225475779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596939739","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008940351,0.0066890665,0.0008792859,0.54629266,0.029356005,0.0017318098,0.00387489,0.00032787715,0.40190804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014252105,0.0016319468,0.00070246507,0.24068294,0.0025219803,0.00038505736,0.0005709065,0.00015045477,0.73910224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760058,0.0013853031,0.0011463317,0.0016475288,0.012928346,0.006886598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97719085,0.006765672,0.0007310697,0.0010228839,0.009958152,0.0043312856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011793887,0.0013997043,0.0019506058,0.002892586,0.032133687,0.015118596,0.0049014967,0.06215935,0.034288887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037361734,0.003238773,0.0029419244,0.0024760137,0.006069494,0.0032952167,0.0036819393,0.032463327,0.009132215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042060517,0.00004347893,0.0008474548,0.000070710965,0.000024602075,0.00020405711,0.0006967517,0.00005982334,0.00024444924,0.017769203,0.97732496,0.0026724474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005803205,0.000023758545,0.007891635,0.00028403237,0.0000635936,0.000043934793,0.0008531432,0.000117444484,0.00021820051,0.0016861182,0.9886679,0.00009213885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9299704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98526764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08627348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08627348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22034298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6259608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597316920","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Conviction and Perceptions of the Canadian Criminal Justice System: Interviews with Community Members","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Criminal justice; Criminology; Perception; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal Conviction; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07116009076056408,"score_gpt":0.33380311438425053,"score_spread":0.26264302362368647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597316920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889313,0.00025748071,0.00008109272,0.0029870297,0.00003894718,0.000098473465,0.000079286474,0.0000031022137,0.007523424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636936,0.0002756142,0.00009355836,0.0008468823,0.0000111356985,0.00004699231,0.000039183422,0.0000051181555,0.0023120446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990341,0.003333279,0.00030688968,0.00046885054,0.0014395962,0.004110511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773557,0.0057268515,0.002178792,0.00033540782,0.0071377624,0.0072654937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007052687,0.00051041116,0.00061943295,0.00296835,0.044407267,0.006726681,0.0026708941,0.002826352,0.0032758275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02260601,0.00085727556,0.000435566,0.0032294607,0.009729987,0.0025104627,0.0053138104,0.0051082447,0.00026448915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003701973,0.000058827063,0.01664427,0.000024925605,0.000004790629,0.00030449263,0.97915477,0.000020670575,0.00018979506,0.00045566694,0.0009428452,0.0021619082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026515104,0.00001532641,0.01080928,0.000026954178,0.0000026287496,0.000025111602,0.9866382,0.000019995927,0.000031585587,0.00003473729,0.0023821408,0.000011490911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98858833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06028408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06028408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09122372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43739367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599540835","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869326","title":"Victim Impact Statements at Sentencing: The Relevance of Ancillary Harm","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Harm; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Law; Psychology; Computer science; Sentence","score_opus":0.021959984172440637,"score_gpt":0.36692199519070906,"score_spread":0.3449620110182684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599540835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8822308,0.0024268287,0.004840649,0.014826512,0.0006959309,0.00017771685,0.0006865007,0.00006163792,0.09405342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545175,0.0004879998,0.0010199199,0.00057738303,0.00027143382,0.00003647033,0.00012403206,0.000017220433,0.0020139543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97921604,0.012701577,0.0014067867,0.000993257,0.004510278,0.0011721596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.800684,0.14786647,0.025969684,0.0063402522,0.015014588,0.0041250745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022205023,0.0004377196,0.0005627697,0.0043998454,0.0030998427,0.004425041,0.0019563893,0.0038183155,0.011533379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22709653,0.00032995417,0.0005012646,0.002501786,0.002699756,0.009244517,0.004270578,0.004820938,0.0012315518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005047507,0.0025432599,0.5578728,0.0013909717,0.00041806028,0.0049755024,0.032146215,0.0018997722,0.0009474036,0.07168497,0.016731078,0.30434254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016565203,0.0011858149,0.80245787,0.0024919698,0.00067451096,0.004022804,0.043357108,0.008013756,0.002482986,0.11739613,0.01749155,0.00025982427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003046524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070005204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022205023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012410975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030187874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11743277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599611594","doi":"","title":"Leaving Dumb Phones Behind: A Commentary on the Warrantless Searches of Smartphone Data Granted in R. v. Fearon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Charter; Supreme court; Warrant; Law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Element (criminal law); Statute; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Dissent; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.1420565112009654,"score_gpt":0.3509380723470759,"score_spread":0.2088815611461105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599611594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004259022,0.005306789,0.0005529363,0.94887656,0.00563706,0.000042510095,0.00013411479,0.00006643204,0.035124592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04977206,0.0023430733,0.0005111401,0.9291026,0.0042114733,0.00006026816,0.000040487183,0.00008223905,0.013876605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671327,0.006175909,0.0022333344,0.0063731847,0.010533595,0.0075513795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96036065,0.027556412,0.0011248726,0.0008168016,0.007814581,0.002326685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024309902,0.0013621256,0.0020736628,0.0022061707,0.031589586,0.012316588,0.011843569,0.08302233,0.003542948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059203345,0.0019389255,0.003084431,0.0024808792,0.02394623,0.00972646,0.004557788,0.07748825,0.0012042697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075431824,0.000026360389,0.00065640104,0.00018426425,0.000040018847,0.0013715897,0.00972197,0.0002148369,0.00050435495,0.25095826,0.7281587,0.00808787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016252349,0.00010782544,0.0031471704,0.0019395953,0.00030958734,0.0007057308,0.017307838,0.0010701921,0.0014321039,0.05916156,0.9141059,0.0005500233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.772424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8129528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.772424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044536926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08845809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45783252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600341827","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4852","title":"THE IDEA OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE: REFLECTIONS ON NEW ZEALAND’S ACCIDENT COMPENSATION (OR PERSONAL INJURY) SYSTEM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17549995626458265,"score_gpt":0.45649297266376465,"score_spread":0.280993016399182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600341827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3998448,0.010170281,0.004664483,0.19434883,0.00069065334,0.00025153602,0.000119309545,0.000029434377,0.38988066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96874726,0.00211775,0.00080507156,0.004958287,0.00010970602,0.00008008426,0.000017371329,0.000016470794,0.023147987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331784,0.0021062463,0.0003916979,0.000681932,0.0016383498,0.0018638921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956215,0.00215229,0.00051478145,0.0002699144,0.0006936198,0.00074794615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069641024,0.00032521406,0.0005798919,0.0017264163,0.014884197,0.011673382,0.0021472035,0.00517932,0.0070998967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011319025,0.0005387926,0.0005608313,0.0014297972,0.044606864,0.010671735,0.012218919,0.008134729,0.0002482185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055140627,0.000056777157,0.0035267458,0.00027244305,0.000017495708,0.002043965,0.3365983,0.0004412685,0.0009902609,0.63663137,0.005162965,0.01420321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094386305,0.00018640127,0.03866312,0.001060727,0.000050893854,0.0013016663,0.36127067,0.0011277316,0.0005397539,0.15699539,0.43845314,0.00025613792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7107591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05898068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028554915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61588585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601240183","doi":"","title":"Informing the Future of End-of-Life Care in Canada: Lessons from the Quebec Legislative Experience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Autonomy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Politics; Legislature; Right to life; Law; Public administration; Humanities; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.018062679284181597,"score_gpt":0.2964679113254858,"score_spread":0.2784052320413042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601240183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08530404,0.038832348,0.0027058262,0.7166005,0.0018693209,0.00014422314,0.00085404905,0.00008288391,0.15360697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79928863,0.028717572,0.004401039,0.10299376,0.00044751115,0.00011168825,0.00038155672,0.000092494054,0.063565634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086916,0.0028741527,0.00027495148,0.0006056602,0.0026632354,0.0027128106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97876245,0.0076820306,0.0007630838,0.0004517995,0.0077994373,0.004541171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008392464,0.00041188695,0.00048579328,0.0015854299,0.029591894,0.013814138,0.0023538307,0.0061061014,0.005675688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014464667,0.0004277146,0.00070786494,0.003612459,0.012836155,0.003832906,0.00377109,0.008828107,0.00032106045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012668171,0.0001165933,0.01722335,0.00080701034,0.00007714515,0.003211748,0.16228887,0.0028501127,0.00096371735,0.43081233,0.29463035,0.08689206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003061113,0.00004241326,0.019854663,0.0014266211,0.00005521949,0.00025377749,0.07724828,0.0009613163,0.00038970605,0.009284702,0.8902526,0.0002000945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2766612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2766612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41753945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8389705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602532921","doi":"10.11575/prism/30035","title":"Mandatory Minimum Sentences: Reforming Canada's Sentencing Practices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04986321669837596,"score_gpt":0.27141528204655696,"score_spread":0.221552065348181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602532921","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29369706,0.019935887,0.038797826,0.33607775,0.0047196276,0.0032301093,0.0041415975,0.004172105,0.29522803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7959377,0.009167461,0.047482755,0.045627456,0.0009126009,0.0008135672,0.0017266643,0.00047117597,0.09786058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98097664,0.0026823445,0.000819633,0.001373025,0.009604992,0.0045433342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670323,0.0041496963,0.0012075597,0.0009690073,0.020030059,0.0066113113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014735943,0.00055497244,0.00045049787,0.004158514,0.016717546,0.00540244,0.005741709,0.0033459077,0.0075771697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037244845,0.0010333896,0.0008340219,0.0035160866,0.0031275486,0.0025554565,0.004001437,0.0041622696,0.00073048525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032675956,0.00040526898,0.02871874,0.0012107539,0.00011977476,0.0018506347,0.02069535,0.01132602,0.005559892,0.16286418,0.38946864,0.37745398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038828093,0.0003272386,0.14557874,0.0015288524,0.00017960873,0.00041980617,0.010056058,0.012121845,0.002117999,0.011091608,0.81555873,0.000631213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99327844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99718636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14465229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14465229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4414827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604877886","doi":"","title":"“Windows to our Inner Private Lives”: Cell Phones, Informational Privacy and the Power to Search Incident to Arrest in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.022178387114042637,"score_gpt":0.29204043825878634,"score_spread":0.2698620511447437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604877886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6769036,0.003532787,0.001013018,0.1236212,0.0005215554,0.00013757277,0.0007192387,0.00003514855,0.19351591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97088146,0.0014644555,0.000090013215,0.004436394,0.000044261775,0.000019047322,0.00007534655,0.000021424506,0.022967646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956785,0.00043484377,0.000096413925,0.00024398924,0.0009946529,0.0025516225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928504,0.0017309316,0.00060070073,0.00017070115,0.0019138108,0.002733471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014458838,0.00017969444,0.000401745,0.0015782575,0.024330653,0.010287334,0.0022673965,0.0028983473,0.0118377665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01034758,0.00038140535,0.00033032493,0.0028957373,0.01043192,0.0027450258,0.005840922,0.005949131,0.00045493976],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020890862,0.00019237564,0.13400535,0.00032460125,0.00006766861,0.002574117,0.46314633,0.0010134889,0.000734726,0.22741205,0.10169204,0.068628356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028842509,0.000041683285,0.121853456,0.0004747944,0.000052728097,0.00036270745,0.6740877,0.00079517835,0.00029858033,0.008219902,0.19363305,0.00015136914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085456185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085456185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14537804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6200309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605447899","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Safer Communities and Neighbourhoods Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Environmental planning; Legislation; Business; Environmental protection; Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law; Computer security; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09727103351673626,"score_gpt":0.31979761048108357,"score_spread":0.2225265769643473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605447899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09841509,0.0109451385,0.0010568217,0.15727058,0.0054759025,0.0020187018,0.015742512,0.00013549312,0.70893973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20754722,0.0059656897,0.004141673,0.07764989,0.0003852064,0.0018055991,0.004035831,0.00013113726,0.6983378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937263,0.0009580685,0.000622156,0.0005476863,0.0023966609,0.0017490372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989214,0.00404833,0.00088121515,0.0010260864,0.0029859964,0.0018444359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049415994,0.0007969912,0.000891794,0.0027812263,0.014153724,0.00863052,0.0044028605,0.009429005,0.021387383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018189041,0.0016138662,0.0011132297,0.0042830943,0.0046188603,0.0033187494,0.005195903,0.010275025,0.0017083812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023363081,0.00025518297,0.04742764,0.00049620157,0.00016790422,0.0026371155,0.0129851205,0.0010786297,0.0008343673,0.30521965,0.59320855,0.035456065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021978306,0.00008503117,0.18884125,0.0011699115,0.00018265509,0.00039149047,0.021431655,0.00040350188,0.001074802,0.010193607,0.77567816,0.00032801655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96398664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99261206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059413977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059413977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113849476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43108058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605940818","doi":"","title":"Proportionality As a Moral Process: Reconceiving Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimum Penalties","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Discretion; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Judicial discretion; Political science; Constitutional law; Due Process Clause; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.03258079987474709,"score_gpt":0.36176128704216204,"score_spread":0.32918048716741494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605940818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11087084,0.0018240529,0.5199786,0.051362943,0.00076066377,0.00034175592,0.00007835306,0.00026083834,0.31452197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96825457,0.0003027635,0.024078509,0.0015416037,0.00016352831,0.00008764041,0.000014399229,0.000046939214,0.0055099907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554623,0.018089674,0.0014746186,0.0033356969,0.017179573,0.0044582104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778711,0.0128377,0.00196405,0.0029688543,0.0033095162,0.0010488923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028477922,0.00065161905,0.0007333013,0.002546747,0.0064132367,0.011686086,0.0036238022,0.005377616,0.002411724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06624872,0.00062411,0.0009297326,0.0013145688,0.036965396,0.011725732,0.008526761,0.009458507,0.0002897354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007112334,0.0000093409835,0.00015943716,0.000012970947,0.000004369563,0.00003720581,0.0014407712,0.0007134766,0.00011729707,0.99158,0.00020778053,0.005710209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022419026,0.000025811822,0.00051568216,0.00007863716,0.000019199138,0.00004616408,0.0006058657,0.003526983,0.0006758378,0.98290944,0.011538,0.000035975532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040489968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044583306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040489968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015641108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034260154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15060747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606606565","doi":"","title":"Recent Development in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05329449941115426,"score_gpt":0.3195878401051497,"score_spread":0.2662933406939954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606606565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036710426,0.18477106,0.0036123549,0.4113141,0.007443199,0.0002478739,0.008425139,0.0004662921,0.34700957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5558571,0.25854015,0.011773466,0.044279125,0.0035185514,0.0001712529,0.0049578,0.00024301665,0.12065942],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201304,0.00092929666,0.00049028295,0.00092554116,0.0041562757,0.0014856294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9326733,0.0051593627,0.00242426,0.0010385859,0.051286034,0.007418402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010506164,0.00087604095,0.00075573573,0.018338932,0.010346363,0.010174627,0.003500668,0.0030132157,0.032935556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034208834,0.00062916736,0.0009121121,0.0271185,0.0066396943,0.0035919962,0.0029068207,0.003461538,0.0016798578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012060055,0.00014532462,0.026010757,0.0024092796,0.00010255784,0.00032332944,0.0032722545,0.0011276628,0.00035117968,0.19985212,0.37917638,0.38710853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001610682,0.000028036919,0.065961786,0.0013111266,0.00007767338,0.000184126,0.0027544042,0.00062284805,0.00023950996,0.005386763,0.9233511,0.00006642445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98952615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19057313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19057313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31302765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9388204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606776311","doi":"10.11575/prism/28760","title":"Absolute and Conditional Discharges in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Absolute (philosophy); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016276678938622613,"score_gpt":0.23730037246577232,"score_spread":0.2210236935271497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606776311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7445971,0.0048580104,0.0016098002,0.022345047,0.00032591337,0.00016332595,0.017937465,0.000104531304,0.20805882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860385,0.0009836063,0.0004682987,0.00060953404,0.00004469863,0.000027090156,0.0023343374,0.000020613212,0.009473392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98776776,0.00078332203,0.0007322081,0.0009929476,0.004977182,0.004746512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98062664,0.0047703055,0.0020165534,0.0008876775,0.008969453,0.0027292892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004803922,0.0003654123,0.00074288616,0.0063429237,0.006770197,0.0056088557,0.0035537009,0.001996383,0.014437244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055095203,0.00054104096,0.0009655034,0.010381224,0.003995417,0.0027271917,0.003380718,0.004439098,0.0004860513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039297828,0.00015071439,0.31302187,0.0002996786,0.00015960475,0.00044895688,0.0070611103,0.00484848,0.00021419075,0.5514279,0.068181634,0.053792927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008710051,0.00007305028,0.83621687,0.00064627954,0.00026533884,0.00047074215,0.012057627,0.010227812,0.0003703214,0.07423814,0.06502286,0.00032390788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11298322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11298322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17002936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8197545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606922302","doi":"10.1177/016934410402200104","title":"Codes of Conduct for the Judiciary in Civil Law Countries: The Dutch Example","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Law; Political science; Safeguarding; Code of conduct; Civil code; Code (set theory); Independence (probability theory); Ethical code; Individualism; Computer science","score_opus":0.06134808012574244,"score_gpt":0.34776196725601105,"score_spread":0.2864138871302686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606922302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0395858,0.009598453,0.021731928,0.026150279,0.000679574,0.00010629646,0.00033067117,0.000026755451,0.90179014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.870318,0.010807497,0.03376492,0.003954427,0.0002502165,0.00029878473,0.00044464035,0.00013741468,0.08002407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959255,0.005642027,0.0005485656,0.00048319873,0.0026051495,0.0011285517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285805,0.003982751,0.00056638464,0.0005631987,0.0016859174,0.0003437597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043988787,0.0003443343,0.00037955347,0.001720422,0.004309193,0.0065563065,0.00086739194,0.0038584892,0.003854448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01691374,0.00031392695,0.00054520805,0.00469771,0.007247642,0.004656069,0.0028417099,0.002521338,0.00085433346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085667,0.000009280797,0.00037698064,0.00004651373,0.00000245888,0.0002669919,0.0033969115,0.00035994753,0.000069725764,0.9793997,0.006600455,0.009462612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004249864,0.000015624702,0.0024647363,0.0005279227,0.000014442524,0.0006727459,0.0056366376,0.0019635193,0.00040400532,0.313214,0.67498696,0.000056956687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08677915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0714355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08677915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011122758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007884021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17254806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607234028","doi":"","title":"Judging Sexual Assault Trials: Systemic Failure in the Case of Regina v Bassam Al-Rawi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Sexual assault; Psychology; Cross-examination; Criminology; Political science; Witness; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.07683977261115024,"score_gpt":0.36694719748358634,"score_spread":0.2901074248724361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607234028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1878133,0.015161807,0.024760041,0.6236481,0.005486208,0.0009583057,0.0001549873,0.0004591496,0.14155802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8274413,0.0024868373,0.015114585,0.13886371,0.00445943,0.0007324716,0.00007930082,0.00015562295,0.0106667075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84501404,0.11103204,0.010831341,0.009429428,0.017103333,0.006589786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62112314,0.31023946,0.01922716,0.013327465,0.026348582,0.009734311],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19661796,0.0006745549,0.0018659187,0.0024641647,0.015650993,0.0187591,0.005119516,0.03261895,0.0030155901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37638122,0.0017574021,0.0013447854,0.0016763221,0.018501345,0.010980375,0.0110437935,0.028883489,0.0010481806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011744516,0.00024027121,0.023743616,0.0016710979,0.00068893266,0.03938127,0.13269943,0.0024004916,0.0027895365,0.42129385,0.26581466,0.1081024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015930139,0.0012253678,0.01615104,0.005253586,0.0008413653,0.011462943,0.049611595,0.010659483,0.004485786,0.47237346,0.425376,0.00096631265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009907227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022889163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99009275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006575092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015958186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99071306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607265275","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4558","title":"Laverne A. Jacobs &amp; Justice Anne L. Mactavish, eds., Dialogue Between Court And Tribunals – Essays In Administrative Law And Justice (2001- 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Administration of justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Administration (probate law); Administrative law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10415412601389791,"score_gpt":0.40192674316524135,"score_spread":0.29777261715134345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607265275","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041083808,0.83414006,0.0012919307,0.06394795,0.008400607,0.000026649834,0.00021084094,0.00008865555,0.09148246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0097725,0.82316387,0.0019838756,0.009511407,0.0047472348,0.000047610174,0.00023570712,0.00010075105,0.15043704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987662,0.00029372168,0.00006781605,0.000119140575,0.0006521613,0.00010103868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807835,0.00097641716,0.00012995747,0.000053570613,0.00050857733,0.00025322798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020311223,0.0013023559,0.0006273097,0.0028368444,0.0031562678,0.00652935,0.0016083837,0.0031143066,0.021116378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034474519,0.00078161666,0.00047323544,0.0031331314,0.0018487471,0.0063603665,0.0014130594,0.0026174074,0.011864665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007984902,0.00001808949,0.00015588637,0.00023165968,0.000004312756,0.00004457122,0.00068832067,0.00008116879,0.000040629067,0.011128459,0.9167577,0.07084135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028300074,0.0000033564536,0.00070900447,0.00054877554,0.0000053778926,0.00008371959,0.0007750986,0.00007969464,0.00005670442,0.0048934068,0.9928343,0.0000078151525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055913497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15119885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9440865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00499966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009401574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11117613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608718183","doi":"","title":"Une revue de certaines décisions d’intérêt rendues en 2016 par la Commission des oppositions du Canada : leçons à tirer en quatre thèmes","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023647038687881598,"score_gpt":0.29123824802620774,"score_spread":0.26759120933832614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608718183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07794727,0.04209889,0.0022295972,0.7753458,0.012435505,0.00026644996,0.00214809,0.00014767006,0.08738068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5526294,0.024968676,0.0054290425,0.25135598,0.0037231685,0.00036867522,0.0014436566,0.00040922916,0.15967213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94638115,0.0049448195,0.004184484,0.0032933066,0.026887171,0.014308957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91051435,0.033763472,0.0042786803,0.0017034793,0.040258802,0.009481173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038232163,0.0007346289,0.0011492699,0.0043328307,0.020554584,0.028993718,0.0042608986,0.01849649,0.0076728635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1185081,0.0012583571,0.0017777375,0.006867042,0.011551332,0.0070429468,0.0062910407,0.022746572,0.0008474826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041071538,0.00012092538,0.027386151,0.0017730185,0.00024743724,0.0028432403,0.07138241,0.0013101051,0.0021883345,0.23189089,0.5761185,0.084328316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005639728,0.000044636385,0.030330436,0.0024970772,0.0001036218,0.00021978303,0.031125095,0.00031752526,0.0010974656,0.0062219533,0.92775255,0.00023331855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96560514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98137236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13625732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13625732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30638158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609370083","doi":"","title":"Regulating Inductive Reasoning In Sexual Assault Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Credibility; Witness; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04829442865174226,"score_gpt":0.36874147960823345,"score_spread":0.3204470509564912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609370083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28891578,0.0063842465,0.17908643,0.08886465,0.0010643374,0.0009980234,0.00008576723,0.00073919055,0.43386164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547956,0.0010277595,0.029429058,0.00977415,0.00032772066,0.00037401257,0.000026122527,0.0001095727,0.004136013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9093462,0.044370525,0.004932312,0.006609365,0.02609685,0.008644705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82832664,0.14146206,0.008705368,0.0083253095,0.0111475475,0.002033006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07970501,0.00053256523,0.0008432335,0.0034439594,0.008561503,0.011864358,0.0056648427,0.006916148,0.0018588187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15599538,0.0010374112,0.0011084535,0.0013947458,0.026977504,0.006359251,0.013575981,0.01013155,0.0007453592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009805711,0.00010521006,0.0048541124,0.00014500708,0.000056054483,0.001463525,0.02722515,0.0037898314,0.0031204883,0.9129102,0.0050782226,0.041154057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012285163,0.00012882626,0.0049448223,0.0007644982,0.00013190077,0.000628156,0.009343596,0.010648026,0.009356414,0.89797944,0.06574249,0.00020900238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017243084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015828632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07970501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01344999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013262332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42152542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610341274","doi":"10.17118/11143/10458","title":"L’éventualité de mécanismes réflexifs dans le cadre du procès pénal français","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.009153411711967608,"score_gpt":0.22190961534700634,"score_spread":0.21275620363503875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610341274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71982294,0.0022517086,0.009798324,0.01900949,0.0001180063,0.00007625666,0.00015015564,0.00005108944,0.24872203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99052984,0.00025409288,0.0008182745,0.0002300109,0.000014482602,0.000014072686,0.000016733913,0.000010343233,0.008111962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922936,0.0023687338,0.0002940438,0.0011382512,0.001711916,0.0021934782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220575,0.008257058,0.0033518146,0.001365954,0.0039271535,0.00089228887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013375603,0.00036390772,0.0002852619,0.002422871,0.0064380416,0.0103315115,0.0009985161,0.0028602213,0.00958217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025275761,0.00048237154,0.00044880452,0.0013646439,0.012930377,0.005147107,0.0032804047,0.0029734983,0.00069490686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012007798,0.000055003708,0.029338013,0.000093803545,0.000045964065,0.0008687589,0.07357408,0.0006687296,0.0016479326,0.8563651,0.0024326695,0.034789916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096978474,0.0002581187,0.25663936,0.0012356694,0.0001238812,0.0011685144,0.18186703,0.003497577,0.0064217285,0.28421196,0.2641897,0.0002895535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13358802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13310674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13358802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012995887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008726266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2656209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611576022","doi":"10.17118/11143/10459","title":"Perspectives pour un principe de sécurité juridique en droit canadien : les pistes du droit européen","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008372292835846104,"score_gpt":0.21802871036258814,"score_spread":0.20965641752674202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611576022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052427106,0.08530754,0.0048715468,0.2653244,0.0018564118,0.0000501712,0.00032065058,0.000047548452,0.58979464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80218554,0.052129913,0.0034868433,0.037163187,0.0013418193,0.0001410781,0.00025677914,0.000076118624,0.10321869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699056,0.0010931147,0.000069394555,0.00043898172,0.0006357065,0.00077219197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721247,0.0012202816,0.00021097418,0.00012666825,0.0007029006,0.000526637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003960496,0.00067000755,0.00060654175,0.0033814781,0.01136188,0.016757127,0.0019398947,0.007185391,0.013064771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051336847,0.00032464563,0.00078293873,0.003866376,0.019231766,0.008809427,0.0047365264,0.011341577,0.0013461263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014923496,0.0000134671045,0.00065107574,0.000062889674,0.000008041798,0.0001876991,0.013687553,0.00028607104,0.00005178297,0.97184247,0.0069861994,0.0062078144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003179735,0.000027839478,0.0053828945,0.0016177521,0.000025447998,0.00022646258,0.041667923,0.000467125,0.0001908995,0.3301218,0.62016803,0.00007204949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2053183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19313721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79468167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020904327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020200443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40824646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612230206","doi":"10.33137/cal.v4i1.28143","title":"Making Modern Criminal Law Theory: Reflections on Farmer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Public law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Political science; Order (exchange); Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal justice; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.25974253422175475,"score_gpt":0.5072798401635514,"score_spread":0.24753730594179668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612230206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044025206,0.18475668,0.009458411,0.6986398,0.0034805525,0.000033518798,0.000041005078,0.000034552468,0.0991529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3518503,0.34736526,0.013971006,0.20003448,0.018561892,0.00027276156,0.000065669614,0.00015225857,0.06772638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949521,0.0029441635,0.00012588002,0.00056160154,0.0011126628,0.0003036784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98366886,0.014597844,0.00033217345,0.0002239536,0.0009247672,0.0002523704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008866191,0.00047939044,0.0006883141,0.0031059624,0.0057639563,0.007464822,0.0020537924,0.009412394,0.004285025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015460874,0.00048295144,0.00044443167,0.0032535628,0.039839376,0.021927705,0.0034859462,0.009314038,0.00082280964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069142448,0.000017800408,0.00008455734,0.00015839751,0.000003438287,0.000078752244,0.002449073,0.0002362075,0.00003527807,0.9569979,0.030789396,0.009142393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073186657,0.000014408676,0.00013498838,0.0005362701,0.0000030945,0.00010426956,0.0028500247,0.00029003512,0.000078945246,0.74467665,0.25128677,0.000017215498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01245347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011969193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01245347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010803054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008291916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078382015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612415927","doi":"","title":"Electronic Evidence in Canada - Chapter 9, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Digital evidence; The Internet; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Digital forensics; History","score_opus":0.053739326934055406,"score_gpt":0.31132971184675484,"score_spread":0.2575903849126994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612415927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062175565,0.1092423,0.002802368,0.088595375,0.0033927609,0.00041146536,0.002551904,0.00018791604,0.78659827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12504686,0.15807159,0.009957562,0.04091438,0.0009083656,0.0002213606,0.00199002,0.00019981373,0.6626901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939911,0.00034462428,0.00030261528,0.0004092903,0.0036711628,0.0012812469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930629,0.00077935494,0.00023869045,0.00014247204,0.004667195,0.001109418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003189263,0.00047550062,0.00053783157,0.0040010326,0.012909579,0.013996366,0.0022542013,0.005334841,0.025257064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007894172,0.00088908366,0.00070251443,0.0058906917,0.0048841797,0.0031020448,0.0030405745,0.004252216,0.002545489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018919793,0.000037526555,0.0015272846,0.000549803,0.00001351059,0.000521638,0.0017875179,0.00085494306,0.00036992726,0.56861115,0.35233584,0.073371805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045429547,0.0000064078386,0.00247748,0.0007299059,0.000008270009,0.000090655,0.0008054292,0.000115855,0.00013812417,0.0058939275,0.98970443,0.00002500582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99141484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1457217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1457217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3175714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99084175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613250512","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2017.470","title":"Cell Site Simulators: A Call for More Protective Federal Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Legislation; Internet privacy; Government (linguistics); Conversation; Computer security; Personally identifiable information; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04312109194144873,"score_gpt":0.3245830469146637,"score_spread":0.28146195497321497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613250512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002888421,0.004486429,0.009995462,0.90073305,0.01259162,0.00024687534,0.00055792386,0.0024714917,0.066028744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022157526,0.0045032413,0.021054104,0.85735285,0.003974555,0.00037084502,0.000774239,0.00091469963,0.08889788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732363,0.0062108687,0.0015968424,0.0029774618,0.0116304625,0.0043480904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91003716,0.03870201,0.004028412,0.015202148,0.019138142,0.012892105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031835727,0.0011845265,0.0011526368,0.0026819613,0.0076652328,0.012992657,0.006665145,0.038937904,0.07603636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06423973,0.0013664047,0.0031241905,0.0019591928,0.009528023,0.026891502,0.009466346,0.0373262,0.024207478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046653044,0.00032896045,0.00093363057,0.00016457964,0.000020225105,0.00026613392,0.0010474582,0.00020606328,0.00082666037,0.096982434,0.8557552,0.043421935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023180673,0.00005459449,0.0005780811,0.0002703318,0.000011264437,0.00011862829,0.0005174614,0.00016867637,0.00029742825,0.00608112,0.9918452,0.00003414244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029455312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0380621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07603636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006426504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031853378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.254367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613999954","doi":"","title":"Anti-Gang Legislation: Is the Disease Worst than the Cure?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Criminal code; Constitutionality; Civil liberties; Political science; Humanities; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Constitution; Criminal law; Art","score_opus":0.023341826691470054,"score_gpt":0.30760349360517064,"score_spread":0.2842616669137006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613999954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018560477,0.04154602,0.00016817528,0.88271266,0.013815118,0.000016702406,0.00027409295,0.000077108234,0.059534162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093619525,0.067114204,0.00057232793,0.4885622,0.013656649,0.00005172286,0.00044893587,0.00017147289,0.335803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966949,0.00057896646,0.0001181261,0.00029579963,0.0012472362,0.0010650093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509746,0.00079927396,0.00046732524,0.00019700616,0.0021758701,0.0012630724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022117463,0.00057964487,0.00046636214,0.0010836306,0.0076018646,0.009176549,0.001362184,0.006391618,0.027809067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007967488,0.00036968972,0.0003028602,0.0011798891,0.011187359,0.003945613,0.0018303065,0.0073652053,0.005328024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029368872,0.000017286733,0.00093088695,0.00023575102,0.000010171092,0.00017816885,0.0024183774,0.000027980817,0.00018463166,0.042215522,0.9359357,0.017816313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004959078,0.0000104367955,0.0017579163,0.00025665163,0.0000069124994,0.000070029215,0.0023562587,0.000010723639,0.00006380144,0.001414368,0.99403834,0.00000958701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59690154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7669585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59690154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019791009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03361741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8109448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615912535","doi":"10.71781/2166","title":"Les implications de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation du Canada pour l'État de droit et la justice transitionnelle : étude comparée avec l'Afrique du Sud","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034979884024936424,"score_gpt":0.35919343871647186,"score_spread":0.32421355469153545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615912535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57387394,0.014933129,0.0035581498,0.10016466,0.0009467632,0.00026145182,0.0015058483,0.00007163995,0.30468446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95789725,0.0032843305,0.0012130885,0.0057127913,0.000042242616,0.00005837954,0.00019717138,0.000025242172,0.031569544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916338,0.0013642741,0.00016110853,0.00044926794,0.0027761366,0.0036154767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937915,0.0011260706,0.00052352523,0.00021092,0.0026335837,0.0017143938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00413375,0.0002608807,0.0004293523,0.001706668,0.018875612,0.010139486,0.0014541764,0.0018342328,0.006369546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011056185,0.00024187627,0.0004832213,0.0038508193,0.00714853,0.0023423634,0.004837018,0.0039512427,0.00023925533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011600115,0.00008139058,0.064493164,0.00038082607,0.000104518345,0.00090631534,0.092221566,0.0013019892,0.00070693175,0.715311,0.041466486,0.08290977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053165666,0.00008131008,0.17233056,0.0016418837,0.0001443625,0.00034205962,0.17263621,0.001227636,0.0009003764,0.025480684,0.6249649,0.00019686039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13658275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13658275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30941814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616016891","doi":"","title":"Breslaw v Montréal (Ville)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.03152090902814618,"score_gpt":0.3136406745343929,"score_spread":0.28211976550624673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616016891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028911462,0.0059714117,0.0016456037,0.05257106,0.001477983,0.00036273562,0.0022092077,0.00044371845,0.9064069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16024958,0.0015588857,0.0019545106,0.04268592,0.0003553798,0.00021255533,0.0004833667,0.00015094555,0.79234886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580836,0.00043019673,0.00010509347,0.00054426165,0.0012845433,0.001827528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819916,0.0005189522,0.00008842929,0.00016728856,0.0006180997,0.00040809464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023604992,0.00081637426,0.0006824047,0.0019505677,0.012329572,0.008263438,0.0026692662,0.010967535,0.056302913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008761781,0.0011504616,0.00095044327,0.0017301159,0.0028730305,0.0020054413,0.0030841788,0.0075779185,0.0042931074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011818713,0.00007068699,0.0037112471,0.00013073691,0.00006953974,0.0013755502,0.0012823702,0.00037050954,0.0009983948,0.4735556,0.48465437,0.033662807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014359909,0.000056094137,0.014880148,0.00020502401,0.000089374844,0.0003718501,0.0005830092,0.00038178367,0.0011221889,0.014709719,0.9673418,0.00011534923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91064394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9636758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089356065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02350213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0427579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18835199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622509506","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Privacy Law In Canada by Colin H.H. McNairn and Alexander K. Scott","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020821476155695275,"score_gpt":0.2703251312553222,"score_spread":0.24950365509962694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622509506","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012002697,0.88262564,0.0001818569,0.061073903,0.016096318,0.000035538393,0.000312717,0.000034335055,0.03951972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024540708,0.9055691,0.00029373242,0.023064254,0.009313532,0.000046485464,0.00038283964,0.000049194936,0.058826774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978921,0.00018483869,0.00008156449,0.00012559006,0.0015096478,0.00020622015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087673,0.0023318012,0.00035672472,0.00018834151,0.005534002,0.0007123793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517864,0.0013801208,0.0016383125,0.005381134,0.0040854285,0.005252562,0.0024911205,0.004038498,0.02131157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008480583,0.000655866,0.0006080223,0.015577621,0.004285104,0.0034220957,0.0014482884,0.0045290273,0.007297691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023829882,0.0000035300125,0.000049313297,0.00022440203,0.0000025723843,0.000015104906,0.000045775498,0.000049055456,0.000005554925,0.0019156771,0.9814383,0.016248478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036990577,0.0000028235468,0.0005406735,0.0012595623,0.0000051738593,0.00006372547,0.000091844515,0.000023556018,0.000007683486,0.00096574274,0.9970258,0.000009771974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78460693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8967916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21539307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03814161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060629975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4333231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626888679","doi":"10.1017/9781108333436.012","title":"Canadian Constitutional Law of Freedom of Expression","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Content (measure theory); Law; Freedom of information; Political science; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Mathematics; Human rights; Programming language","score_opus":0.044083150834223796,"score_gpt":0.2511995627698897,"score_spread":0.2071164119356659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626888679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007915128,0.005891307,0.00077789684,0.0074028154,0.00033650076,0.00003152141,0.0005095426,0.0000385653,0.9842204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18571696,0.012187412,0.0033247478,0.0071941437,0.0005236235,0.00021031297,0.0008776526,0.00017970895,0.78978544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384576,0.00066080346,0.00014493296,0.0008428064,0.0031972518,0.0013084408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825126,0.00035119188,0.000041521962,0.00026071788,0.00092398573,0.00017128162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025748622,0.0009738916,0.0007241654,0.0026448332,0.012162005,0.011006759,0.0021551177,0.00508643,0.030335631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005692189,0.0006241225,0.00060981064,0.0035076328,0.014315625,0.0031399885,0.0023742681,0.005771552,0.003518448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027276794,0.000001856212,0.000034699002,0.000020969193,0.000001488977,0.000012089613,0.00031719194,0.000053830627,0.000021754267,0.9523595,0.043364696,0.003809279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008368931,0.0000034166474,0.00058955885,0.00020170143,0.000009588413,0.00003405579,0.00029022194,0.0001397033,0.00009241023,0.11941068,0.8791976,0.000022713646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9262772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9459983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086070105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086070105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09121059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62448525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635332471","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5496478","title":"Le droit moral au Canada : facteur d'idées","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009984059097620275,"score_gpt":0.25981680309734917,"score_spread":0.2498327439997289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635332471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16236593,0.052119914,0.0021167404,0.20518129,0.0025312498,0.0000685661,0.0020984637,0.00009638554,0.57342154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8417535,0.018217606,0.0012861636,0.012170372,0.00070691283,0.00004025042,0.00035530675,0.000103987666,0.12536594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99200046,0.0007943206,0.00021278855,0.0007050202,0.003872947,0.0024143984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991932,0.0025644912,0.0005861938,0.00027218423,0.0032996526,0.0013455112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036704594,0.0005736202,0.00069428567,0.0046029435,0.01824627,0.015412058,0.0014802923,0.005535068,0.015544297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013167394,0.0005174063,0.00059600064,0.006098952,0.010933326,0.0036719646,0.0029886542,0.008751062,0.0008348902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013259133,0.00005029054,0.018396398,0.00028324535,0.00006775837,0.00067101326,0.022468602,0.0006446078,0.00032248363,0.7700279,0.12669994,0.06023522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004076281,0.000022122995,0.05257621,0.0011222091,0.0000661635,0.00039622004,0.031052152,0.00066983746,0.00039966195,0.027892781,0.8856579,0.00010407491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11945122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11945122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17471772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8666833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265319787","doi":"","title":"Crimes of Colour: Racialization and the Criminal Justice System in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Criminalization; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal justice; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Race (biology); History","score_opus":0.11623980732258908,"score_gpt":0.38895627827256823,"score_spread":0.27271647094997914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265319787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0649454,0.6243722,0.00039422294,0.15319647,0.0022966156,0.00009832114,0.000705264,0.000052651558,0.15393883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36743125,0.56312793,0.00071119796,0.006320084,0.00058085745,0.00005480743,0.00040465858,0.00005524498,0.06131405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986833,0.00014844503,0.000029409093,0.00008354621,0.0005414814,0.0005138302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843246,0.00020528176,0.00010342386,0.000023283588,0.0006785213,0.0005570221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081873406,0.0006726124,0.00052406604,0.0020871279,0.016547807,0.007192409,0.0015060804,0.0017341956,0.005106762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002397375,0.0003875177,0.00032606284,0.0071623144,0.0084619345,0.0021053646,0.0021534213,0.0022142131,0.0003303114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000615488,0.00007379231,0.018629378,0.001005362,0.000049685463,0.0007483606,0.08769025,0.0010752155,0.00024801164,0.11187939,0.5274213,0.25111774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012528178,0.000018793342,0.08694913,0.0018189502,0.000051250485,0.00028851544,0.09038893,0.00046412516,0.00014593598,0.008608509,0.8111609,0.00009234171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99718165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13534917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13534917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2442953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656835543","doi":"10.21991/c96966","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, II : l’article 33 de la Charte canadienne ne permet pas de suspendre la répartition fédérative des compétences","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05619664453501023,"score_gpt":0.33656291197268334,"score_spread":0.2803662674376731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656835543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07206705,0.007942101,0.003077941,0.057549402,0.0013231843,0.00010452152,0.00034062358,0.00007624813,0.85751885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5218822,0.0027512324,0.002226544,0.008295256,0.0003513928,0.00011286647,0.00018225083,0.00008116539,0.46411717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886763,0.0002836597,0.000036402296,0.0001623522,0.00039476634,0.0002552496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871266,0.0002879562,0.00012991326,0.00008759074,0.00055810483,0.0002237542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017946246,0.00035279544,0.00017895339,0.00088961626,0.008175014,0.0074424986,0.0006254382,0.001924168,0.010813551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035222517,0.00016481569,0.00015671465,0.0013746127,0.0075079617,0.0022615832,0.0015951762,0.0039311685,0.0016826815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007499214,0.000032313907,0.004342539,0.00009488966,0.0000071849126,0.0003296567,0.04657345,0.00020935269,0.0003825863,0.8221405,0.08980419,0.03600827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012937484,0.000021544682,0.00607756,0.00015584205,0.0000048433644,0.00011513428,0.01640727,0.00014483182,0.00063389266,0.017942628,0.9584594,0.000024098039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19649187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33768222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80350816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013734988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022636015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3906963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2692194743","doi":"","title":"A Question of ‘Desirability’: Balancing and Improperly Obtained Evidence in Comparative Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Common law; Jurisprudence; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Political science; Perspective (graphical); High Court","score_opus":0.3217763733101101,"score_gpt":0.45304869729556135,"score_spread":0.13127232398545124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2692194743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025917929,0.041249115,0.044661634,0.07977747,0.0010636655,0.00010013824,0.00010252293,0.00003463561,0.8070929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361876,0.014258202,0.014819115,0.0092163235,0.0018980392,0.00026185883,0.000091988884,0.00015112894,0.023115838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9399846,0.04455297,0.0020331575,0.0035811225,0.007401071,0.0024470477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92882514,0.057393976,0.0024050532,0.004618937,0.005870212,0.00088670145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060563102,0.0007451164,0.001862462,0.007855042,0.008505438,0.028934479,0.005247967,0.013814308,0.0076906676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08496712,0.00094950065,0.0012973518,0.0046587037,0.11637434,0.036946528,0.010322554,0.010335475,0.0007232667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056230874,0.0000023732389,0.00006686825,0.00004446237,0.0000065647137,0.000054865435,0.0033406352,0.00004124307,0.000028044313,0.9943532,0.00036806328,0.0016880858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013722447,0.000036559497,0.0003913468,0.00081530586,0.000031781714,0.00023337852,0.006238187,0.00019636273,0.0001694219,0.92383546,0.068018325,0.000020146219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007927426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007870911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060563102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015244855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074299616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32029212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2695559067","doi":"10.21991/c9ft21","title":"Was the Supreme Court right to change the law on the right to a speedy trial?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science","score_opus":0.09176488806049153,"score_gpt":0.34214430239926347,"score_spread":0.2503794143387719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2695559067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021604007,0.0044026226,0.01004119,0.77111566,0.0056412253,0.00006286942,0.00020141041,0.00011593735,0.18681505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57290024,0.0019094922,0.004516549,0.35241303,0.004283099,0.00014010277,0.00012182582,0.00017692265,0.06353873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98689497,0.0026171866,0.0006014123,0.0024290045,0.0038677037,0.0035898671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837462,0.009498713,0.000838855,0.0011615622,0.0033201317,0.0014346882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019931158,0.00030565678,0.00068271335,0.00077134796,0.00919405,0.014114185,0.0028181376,0.026325257,0.0062938733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06714773,0.0006380837,0.0008999595,0.0007473984,0.023719465,0.013753454,0.0037719412,0.031179653,0.0012830299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025247775,0.000011600245,0.00030168783,0.000012243703,0.000007260826,0.000096724914,0.0008136875,0.00009169922,0.00010152772,0.9696516,0.02373719,0.00514952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012506093,0.000058459853,0.0010855254,0.0002534459,0.000034423785,0.0001888173,0.0013129911,0.00058445777,0.0006279802,0.62643856,0.36918324,0.00010708062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095969066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068312824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095969066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011816761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021642739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19082093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701570167","doi":"10.4324/9781315197166-7","title":"The Domestic Implementation of International Law: A Canadian Case Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05394344754980281,"score_gpt":0.4069404085289421,"score_spread":0.3529969609791393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701570167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36916822,0.0069653285,0.0019157049,0.01753645,0.00021066172,0.00038793468,0.0008370691,0.000049580114,0.602929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91352177,0.012483895,0.0030068473,0.0038006832,0.00005012564,0.00017422673,0.0004241382,0.00006792815,0.06647049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483734,0.0010761756,0.00010270668,0.00029171872,0.0015693133,0.0021227149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721223,0.0009273606,0.00020474482,0.00016463903,0.0009155834,0.0005754987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031860752,0.0007405014,0.0006311565,0.0037580265,0.040398125,0.00828626,0.0031121075,0.004754286,0.006990212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006029883,0.0005174157,0.0006569026,0.015261034,0.010094107,0.0026815478,0.005982011,0.0043466473,0.0005734201],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007840234,0.0003646651,0.019027958,0.00046608516,0.000034317032,0.021288477,0.26719552,0.0014540583,0.0005699346,0.538925,0.08088511,0.0697105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045489425,0.00007389269,0.024004249,0.00088153273,0.0000844807,0.0038958662,0.4480646,0.0016650046,0.00065012515,0.008244974,0.51226956,0.00012030132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14025457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14025457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10375217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99718285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2705872271","doi":"","title":"Canada. La Supreme Court conferma la legittimità costituzionale di alcune disposizioni dell’Anti-Terrorism Act del 2001","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057443398910410504,"score_gpt":0.34071983036960607,"score_spread":0.28327643145919557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2705872271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012294205,0.007053547,0.0010353976,0.25277212,0.0073726648,0.0005703359,0.022537442,0.00034847748,0.69601583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07667812,0.0030501385,0.0018709459,0.16167033,0.00080879533,0.00037367496,0.0034812437,0.00017219852,0.75189465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972076,0.0004154967,0.00036687008,0.0007831563,0.005855044,0.0028587037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838064,0.0031810696,0.00038848442,0.00057249865,0.01013866,0.0019129771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310124,0.0009441539,0.00092300074,0.0021277273,0.017463302,0.009436722,0.0034214614,0.020716548,0.036114503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013340391,0.0016057173,0.001997549,0.0025412294,0.0030222205,0.0018870365,0.0019237604,0.016280187,0.0068251803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735976,0.000065782246,0.0024109017,0.0001234341,0.000038947048,0.0003433188,0.00039427687,0.00021850805,0.0005299651,0.06349388,0.92464286,0.007650801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014008959,0.000030519088,0.014835483,0.00044237444,0.00012112508,0.00012591232,0.0006408941,0.00048353238,0.0010284724,0.0047004707,0.9772987,0.0001524282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9830277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99321824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07341654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07341654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18827958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53267676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2713442250","doi":"10.7202/1040052ar","title":"Le rôle des normes comptables dans la responsabilité civile des auditeurs de sociétés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999221718854669,"score_gpt":0.3817974042466343,"score_spread":0.29180518705808756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2713442250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42100382,0.0028871675,0.08040405,0.03706893,0.0006705593,0.00032309757,0.0005370131,0.00027836103,0.45682698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97033125,0.0006826367,0.007186363,0.0009885104,0.00006948506,0.00013266217,0.000107127606,0.000058700974,0.020443099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613528,0.018767962,0.0018724804,0.002816204,0.012564701,0.0026257443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277305,0.02764009,0.010455741,0.007599984,0.021810878,0.004762671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027850183,0.0004520566,0.0004470064,0.002596538,0.0055495645,0.012851438,0.0013075231,0.0017055357,0.00896097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06279064,0.0005121561,0.00048374716,0.002513183,0.0112033,0.006969849,0.0040899846,0.0028777707,0.0011943403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018552569,0.00009983041,0.061096847,0.00038488547,0.00009358892,0.00021201948,0.050206527,0.001538015,0.0018713766,0.79874396,0.0058465498,0.07972087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092502094,0.00032141275,0.1780973,0.0016642797,0.0001573263,0.00047042788,0.09877649,0.0057306327,0.005994636,0.38670546,0.32167113,0.00031838974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048175663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04604207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048175663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010409307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023300527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1472876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2718497283","doi":"10.21991/c9b37r","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, I : quelles sont les voies de recours extraordinaires contre un arrêt de la Cour suprême?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.03809130245330594,"score_gpt":0.3435488994852651,"score_spread":0.3054575970319592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2718497283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14729922,0.024721539,0.0041454523,0.3087048,0.0018093593,0.000071590934,0.00050139386,0.000078573736,0.512668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6335735,0.0077927737,0.0022079924,0.046851616,0.0009746891,0.0000792259,0.00024226958,0.00009903645,0.30817887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821365,0.00059035997,0.00006064352,0.0002757678,0.00051831274,0.00034116878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786574,0.00050970266,0.00027182777,0.00010343399,0.0009120221,0.0003372849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003851668,0.00030006227,0.00029837235,0.0007597625,0.009739746,0.010713753,0.0010232306,0.003440361,0.012976383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072428402,0.00020467056,0.00023686123,0.0010188844,0.00985173,0.005022189,0.0027441748,0.005420559,0.0019123644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017954384,0.00003849844,0.009646104,0.00019383845,0.000032959717,0.00068055355,0.034922577,0.00030806023,0.000819272,0.77934945,0.12404645,0.04978272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027894446,0.000048206934,0.0110860355,0.00055243255,0.000016427099,0.00020753534,0.047954835,0.00041341406,0.0015358957,0.064980745,0.8731065,0.00007014215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11796996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25986224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11796996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010405977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014471935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23456657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273134675","doi":"","title":"Independent Legal Representation for Victims: Not a Leg to Stand on: The Unconstitutionality of New Brunswick Regulation 84-20, Section 2 (D)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Obligation; Context (archaeology); Law; Representation (politics); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03531820220026055,"score_gpt":0.3300077164312087,"score_spread":0.29468951423094814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273134675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10204546,0.002681641,0.0052260347,0.1514014,0.0015385504,0.0005688005,0.00086994236,0.00006861505,0.7355995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7519307,0.0022337218,0.005156581,0.077932425,0.00027773913,0.00044262884,0.00042256888,0.00006839756,0.1615353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97688985,0.003137559,0.0016058879,0.0023296312,0.009528651,0.0065083355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844599,0.0056224386,0.0013268101,0.0014348174,0.0057541053,0.0014018846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013944665,0.00049842114,0.0007096775,0.0018748349,0.01622006,0.012442772,0.006280372,0.012395756,0.0061763516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031112393,0.0009778268,0.0006184646,0.0021434573,0.013967061,0.0030479333,0.005076455,0.011482542,0.0010503553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007978861,0.00006662546,0.011774008,0.0001283638,0.000040261628,0.0014716458,0.021882325,0.0003680476,0.0013995894,0.86257845,0.0729156,0.027295293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026805492,0.00010412106,0.04400672,0.0023331565,0.0003628357,0.0012463186,0.0328429,0.001343597,0.0044792695,0.08258433,0.82987547,0.0005531766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.947021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05316115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05316115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15005027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38571298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737160251","doi":"10.7202/1040521ar","title":"L’infraction d’attroupement illégal dans la régulation de la manifestation : un embarras pour la théorie pénale","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017449872015139894,"score_gpt":0.30184238898507276,"score_spread":0.28439251696993284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737160251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06473849,0.0059049833,0.07275209,0.08943451,0.00063281023,0.00008008581,0.00012085875,0.000072664465,0.7662634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934695,0.0024408938,0.003981324,0.004963848,0.0004708952,0.00012583213,0.00003900068,0.00008700706,0.053196244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431556,0.0026256235,0.00015639688,0.00077410665,0.0013996022,0.00072869676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958371,0.0019870503,0.00057999115,0.00072348525,0.0006005267,0.00027176118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034423133,0.0004943386,0.0004194737,0.0012744635,0.00603225,0.008729319,0.0024781926,0.0057735555,0.00563515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004815286,0.00037736853,0.0007463312,0.0011228849,0.040754873,0.0065042265,0.00390525,0.007305516,0.0006856518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015266695,0.0000038311828,0.00014742832,0.000008065606,0.0000014395283,0.000020342322,0.00136316,0.00009202839,0.00002270493,0.9970726,0.00053206185,0.000734861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019085655,0.00004008069,0.0028805279,0.0003218388,0.000024834793,0.00023146422,0.004991402,0.0024699313,0.00040324134,0.84663963,0.14192979,0.000048212558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01913783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016585631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01913783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067236773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004816957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0487839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09892597009970915,"score_gpt":0.39100292239636747,"score_spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738361053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075774556,0.09326778,0.004646309,0.8499409,0.0045820116,0.00009037414,0.00015237021,0.00010851952,0.039634325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38449398,0.12410122,0.024239007,0.44032663,0.012280954,0.00054698705,0.0004961967,0.00017499378,0.013339997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592233,0.02120623,0.0031526054,0.004150748,0.008546308,0.0037208959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8563385,0.086550854,0.01344698,0.010362482,0.02539923,0.007902037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06869956,0.0005224354,0.0015391455,0.0043570814,0.005763776,0.012183138,0.0064416323,0.016071295,0.010636874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17662777,0.00084685255,0.0009769691,0.0045479313,0.018415727,0.018855117,0.006440125,0.015160474,0.0010192654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035301753,0.0001628336,0.000749863,0.0011976943,0.0000324387,0.00017631917,0.0024364067,0.00079514337,0.00014716362,0.7908453,0.058040004,0.14538166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007349201,0.00015531175,0.0067086876,0.011514453,0.000047052923,0.0003965351,0.00547249,0.0006265131,0.0003060474,0.19758278,0.7770023,0.00011436112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029431066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033987235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06869956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019271784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05564116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36332238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738620536","doi":"","title":"Anti-terrorism, the Charter, and International Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Terrorism; Reservation of rights; Guard (computer science); Duty; Ex post facto law; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04597458160345978,"score_gpt":0.297171645317838,"score_spread":0.2511970637143782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738620536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009927779,0.046834163,0.0048187505,0.08216428,0.0026615069,0.00005866525,0.0002732115,0.00004609464,0.8532156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487176,0.039695214,0.009398666,0.03364797,0.004016744,0.00022370898,0.00038786975,0.0000818208,0.06383037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870003,0.0063171196,0.000460605,0.0011460839,0.003592043,0.0014838919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898808,0.005981543,0.0013147955,0.0011360834,0.0011987898,0.000488045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00829457,0.00040735657,0.00046805138,0.0020759373,0.005259048,0.013217946,0.0009693197,0.0073652016,0.0058475873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019097462,0.0003388633,0.00039351126,0.0037058,0.02868805,0.007944411,0.002836688,0.00814128,0.0007955369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040830146,0.00000447071,0.00014472334,0.000018293165,0.0000013332284,0.000017266038,0.00059939723,0.000049890095,0.00001015942,0.98942786,0.006322073,0.0034004315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014731076,0.00002808502,0.0025383618,0.0010489727,0.000013854914,0.00014467169,0.002621502,0.00023572093,0.0001287725,0.4943895,0.4987996,0.000036236874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06404059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066262424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06404059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00869419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012054603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12733567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739629923","doi":"","title":"L’arrêt Lampe Berger c. Pot pourri Accent de la Cour d’appel et sa portée devant les tribunaux québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stress (linguistics); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03257755887388797,"score_gpt":0.32833022139577406,"score_spread":0.2957526625218861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739629923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02145161,0.036624003,0.0025721164,0.8388786,0.020683536,0.00007814137,0.00059098226,0.00017921247,0.07894182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22128691,0.023574216,0.0043661264,0.117502585,0.007568996,0.000113727605,0.00038923466,0.0004923427,0.62470585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957777,0.0012435266,0.00012918163,0.0004961225,0.0017084964,0.0006449264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98377913,0.005046839,0.00069293944,0.00045352662,0.0065040966,0.0035234645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005054547,0.0009475761,0.00081402296,0.0014716646,0.010675956,0.007727841,0.0014883052,0.0073936894,0.038188063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021749636,0.00056518003,0.0007431574,0.0011802859,0.004617037,0.004369672,0.0017523167,0.011676699,0.005011302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001979869,0.00007465263,0.009373956,0.00031082905,0.0000870354,0.0021405069,0.010646479,0.00041093148,0.001239809,0.06309759,0.832874,0.07954626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025414221,0.00004407988,0.0142878415,0.00052429416,0.000018788214,0.0014661966,0.009302957,0.00036261798,0.0006155224,0.0050425464,0.9682037,0.000106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7699657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85831624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23003429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014401253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02721877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46277797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741565324","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Provincial Regulations Table","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Political science; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.2791761825938271,"score_gpt":0.48689408571267234,"score_spread":0.20771790311884525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741565324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008366407,0.0035901545,0.0028144869,0.0131718805,0.0022569294,0.004822845,0.28458834,0.002430549,0.68548816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035467404,0.0044232537,0.013173823,0.00353612,0.0002625165,0.0041353693,0.06376163,0.0012928689,0.90586776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825774,0.0015015212,0.0015223519,0.0009205321,0.011594058,0.001884049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83978605,0.019358449,0.0016967563,0.005579477,0.12782389,0.005755266],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016716197,0.0015242079,0.0021126943,0.023391793,0.013017059,0.012316392,0.0047996817,0.004315452,0.37787762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07669626,0.0032233698,0.0016542013,0.034133863,0.0031949817,0.004108152,0.002653313,0.0051346836,0.1625372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012827994,0.000013355145,0.00015155076,0.0002343549,0.0000021021926,0.0000071338927,0.000098054225,0.00004045269,0.00003298823,0.0034773157,0.984845,0.011084943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029593453,0.000008020782,0.004488555,0.0005413869,0.000014509307,0.000015262924,0.00041407187,0.00010767785,0.0001579895,0.0015120826,0.99267817,0.000032714135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9686602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37787762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08343771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37100434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88738203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743809315","doi":"","title":"Innocence Canada Becoming ‘Shadow of its Former Self’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Shadow (psychology); Self representation; Art; Political science; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Humanities","score_opus":0.03894593149147545,"score_gpt":0.3054877400766108,"score_spread":0.2665418085851353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743809315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06291324,0.0071614874,0.0011572922,0.52081114,0.0032964193,0.000077349774,0.00076269225,0.00010856073,0.40371174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54425985,0.0038294771,0.0013544144,0.09010587,0.00041878168,0.000048342874,0.00028103555,0.00014036932,0.35956186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362963,0.0008675434,0.00012571606,0.00059042586,0.0023970278,0.0023896133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874285,0.0020707909,0.00036453878,0.00041755495,0.005292263,0.0044263382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038487052,0.00030527267,0.00058668654,0.0016419167,0.030884188,0.017536279,0.0021355473,0.007036896,0.022103216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014768157,0.00043357137,0.00044289557,0.0020211816,0.010924646,0.0040724464,0.0054925345,0.010681224,0.0011129158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056446934,0.000036809237,0.010327266,0.00011444363,0.00003870683,0.0006641735,0.011893884,0.00019930553,0.0003556299,0.52135736,0.41594762,0.039008368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011593711,0.000016331112,0.0094459895,0.00028232156,0.00002546811,0.00015421542,0.01998475,0.00023867341,0.00039987717,0.01799774,0.9513805,0.00006249487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98186964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99344903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08449209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08449209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26939824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61303586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27479547","doi":"10.1111/jdi.12558","title":"“The Slow Creep of Complacency”: Ongoing Challenges for Democracies Seeking to Detain Terrorism Suspects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Safeguarding; Government (linguistics); Terrorism; Law; Civil liberties; Supreme court; Judicial review; Politics; Criminal justice; Medicine","score_opus":0.04308377382002733,"score_gpt":0.3170399035795467,"score_spread":0.2739561297595194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27479547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013603794,0.004022442,0.0011220718,0.9642784,0.0018273786,0.000022905711,0.000063726264,0.00009736891,0.01496195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56535447,0.011779255,0.005778839,0.389664,0.0051626517,0.0002406488,0.00023115355,0.0003256028,0.021463376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772677,0.013534376,0.0007737715,0.0017260658,0.0032552711,0.0034427992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.930143,0.028963171,0.0059809024,0.004962813,0.011686025,0.018264193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035779487,0.0006002282,0.0011134949,0.001646291,0.018603,0.013581793,0.0040462282,0.016927335,0.024880372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09381907,0.0005997882,0.00077474804,0.0013972603,0.02035498,0.01634347,0.011139197,0.02084889,0.0058178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012586793,0.00023691093,0.009517692,0.00049721095,0.000071745155,0.0011397358,0.042182364,0.00025504842,0.00060485845,0.1001049,0.6149403,0.23032342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000696434,0.00018562205,0.013112597,0.0022842444,0.000035024208,0.0022274063,0.1355025,0.0006767495,0.00046794774,0.16418113,0.6810919,0.00016513187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009179782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01698001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035779487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006126563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01958179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18922228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748649386","doi":"","title":"for Retaining and Destroying Personal Information Privacy and Insurance in Canada, England, and France – How Does the Responsible Insurer Put Guidelines and Procedures in Place","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03103617864427241,"score_gpt":0.28676317742012164,"score_spread":0.25572699877584926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748649386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2393673,0.009103111,0.0035719636,0.658048,0.0008554261,0.00014173672,0.00032976514,0.00011003015,0.08847266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92300236,0.0033797503,0.0037376154,0.048042398,0.00017667364,0.000050959945,0.00014088982,0.00007673551,0.021392656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95805645,0.010433736,0.0014719898,0.0020235528,0.013787027,0.014227272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325502,0.026071273,0.004169791,0.0031267747,0.024671288,0.00941057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034270283,0.00033211915,0.0007649868,0.0027128044,0.026651172,0.022142055,0.0044089304,0.0123447245,0.0045671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0922552,0.0006331275,0.0012068569,0.0022412073,0.017867455,0.008531172,0.0058713835,0.011206216,0.00045736675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020099281,0.00024099457,0.08851004,0.00029591826,0.00024576206,0.0019234985,0.1067006,0.0012786656,0.00084172544,0.55780685,0.124371536,0.117583476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119601515,0.00017531481,0.13001755,0.0031673906,0.00063003064,0.0011258632,0.20882155,0.0038694574,0.0034365684,0.076176666,0.5718233,0.0006367834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97788143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08304431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08304431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32140583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6025315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748742866","doi":"10.14288/1.0351981","title":"Democratic rights on trial : judicial reasoning, charter litigation, and the shaping of Canadian democracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026687097387287556,"score_gpt":0.23725385394117351,"score_spread":0.21056675655388596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748742866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1869602,0.008125135,0.004883736,0.13199218,0.0004602482,0.00013758968,0.00021418721,0.000088233006,0.6671385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614295,0.0021961723,0.0012092595,0.00554013,0.00005415301,0.000024690558,0.000043772798,0.000028677461,0.02947371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98316735,0.0029633804,0.00030571417,0.001129315,0.0063336543,0.006100693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900092,0.004174707,0.00074475416,0.000528203,0.0032163027,0.0013268627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075583286,0.00036100883,0.0005765551,0.0025854474,0.041844033,0.018711999,0.0024501139,0.0060502538,0.006344577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0252253,0.00041397777,0.00041747713,0.0044196765,0.033215683,0.004750709,0.0046646222,0.009513603,0.00036622907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025672218,0.000018480958,0.002896039,0.000056054883,0.00000908706,0.00050369283,0.031209927,0.00062392565,0.00019802294,0.9271561,0.016792677,0.020510284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076060925,0.00004523141,0.02492795,0.000677808,0.000071298935,0.00046917153,0.098730475,0.0032768263,0.0011971565,0.2700237,0.60017294,0.00033145578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98765415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8120211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18797892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2250909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9418293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750765677","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3013748","title":"Reconsidering Calder: Re-Evaluating the Rule of Absolute Exclusion in the Context of Real Evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.19563002219356074,"score_gpt":0.4177824146193639,"score_spread":0.22215239242580315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750765677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07916072,0.011287942,0.2934978,0.41903877,0.009014126,0.0003510593,0.0005445325,0.0002927629,0.18681225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8933692,0.0014571955,0.06278932,0.03114274,0.003688862,0.00025291622,0.000103641614,0.00031832143,0.0068777273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88618785,0.06771829,0.006631342,0.017956447,0.017408853,0.004097243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54802,0.386234,0.011656798,0.032360107,0.0180496,0.0036795405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12591285,0.0013467355,0.0056209452,0.003194637,0.008517011,0.01654167,0.014931164,0.018828345,0.00938502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45764604,0.0013112369,0.0029242837,0.0030090555,0.061760694,0.03372461,0.013549327,0.033902764,0.0013195844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116834635,0.000024820412,0.0007966131,0.00017316297,0.00008305851,0.00019600875,0.0014906534,0.0011627465,0.00006693706,0.9777778,0.005063702,0.013047576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004021104,0.000016438962,0.00019918737,0.00014197454,0.00003688586,0.000047089634,0.00037923313,0.0020047547,0.00011482874,0.99213517,0.004857636,0.000026630116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013554649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015966013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12591285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008244566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01551221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66589874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755346295","doi":"","title":"Happy Sisyphus: A Review Article of G Palmer and a Butler, a Constitution for Aotearoa New Zealand","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Legislation; Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Habeas corpus; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10949296423553974,"score_gpt":0.42939616545898396,"score_spread":0.31990320122344423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755346295","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008217524,0.89326644,0.00019525693,0.06507409,0.016502136,0.000041408864,0.00009371819,0.000011195486,0.023993917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0093701435,0.9135661,0.00045620286,0.032440383,0.0081268465,0.00009501467,0.00015617031,0.00005207705,0.035737183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857676,0.00031266184,0.000108774504,0.0001990947,0.0006487469,0.00015393681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822956,0.0008133635,0.00015573064,0.000071161114,0.00049788295,0.00023233047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022374121,0.0009195923,0.0010414039,0.002968336,0.002340777,0.0040487945,0.0010763027,0.0040174895,0.009419861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005921434,0.0005235276,0.00056784315,0.004562004,0.0054839146,0.0050493986,0.002197002,0.0044753985,0.0017190203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059685673,0.000062996165,0.00065508304,0.0046639536,0.000030517504,0.0006100702,0.0038873933,0.00013710532,0.0006694798,0.043034706,0.797926,0.148263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065703744,0.000008432024,0.0011592209,0.0014923913,0.000006036115,0.00013787497,0.0005140527,0.000010311562,0.000030538286,0.0008846095,0.9957403,0.00000968957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15265493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21720392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15265493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011063851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015267629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30353278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756895187","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1013","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Twenty Years Later","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03437041727917637,"score_gpt":0.30895696503574077,"score_spread":0.2745865477565644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756895187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12601106,0.020766487,0.0027232626,0.27336547,0.0028773316,0.00014546655,0.009099362,0.00012829568,0.56488323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85463256,0.006376098,0.0023833716,0.009956362,0.000320187,0.000039429124,0.0012607344,0.000052039995,0.12497926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958947,0.00040364472,0.00008457933,0.00036518587,0.002289439,0.000962635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98909783,0.0012000581,0.00044684898,0.0005077987,0.0072236476,0.0015237941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031971477,0.0002668941,0.00034044834,0.002249301,0.008982262,0.006902658,0.00067726226,0.0014312582,0.00997486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014012438,0.00020012658,0.00037016018,0.0039867456,0.00473658,0.0018557514,0.0014644307,0.0027215446,0.00047170892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098971694,0.00003060587,0.027256455,0.00017185611,0.000034790908,0.00030397088,0.014633061,0.00049574726,0.00036951771,0.5655768,0.27861744,0.11241075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016780528,0.000016895052,0.063828625,0.00018724542,0.000026004322,0.0000859847,0.0053380895,0.0002928356,0.00021334253,0.00828048,0.9216311,0.0000825587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99645954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08330958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08330958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12891339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6044562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757321729","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.159","title":"The Difficult Progression of the Rights of Canada's Indigenous Peoples and the Obligation of Fiduciary Duty Indigenous Rights in the Canadian Legal Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Political science; Fiduciary; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Obligation; Public administration; Duty; Sociology; History; Art","score_opus":0.020770043581391767,"score_gpt":0.30592120540273327,"score_spread":0.2851511618213415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757321729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25588787,0.008932015,0.0015784464,0.13772543,0.0004047103,0.00009365287,0.00027780893,0.0000342316,0.59506583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674622,0.002334282,0.0007490086,0.004440316,0.000039981176,0.000016009813,0.000029245359,0.000019279263,0.024909686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994422,0.00063437177,0.00009931992,0.0004019259,0.0015653787,0.0028769858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995615,0.0009924973,0.00021253478,0.00013652116,0.0015631963,0.0014801401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032577065,0.00029208066,0.00038152043,0.002243363,0.055064645,0.013734445,0.002376251,0.0045233294,0.0074493457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008335687,0.0003873105,0.00037776737,0.0027499187,0.037359156,0.004152454,0.0057139285,0.0066440394,0.00022561653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023923374,0.00002277928,0.0047134096,0.00006470618,0.000013150625,0.00053331925,0.083886266,0.00034774214,0.00023037262,0.8678471,0.021593263,0.020724028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003646498,0.00003182495,0.048893977,0.0008163306,0.00007499495,0.0005769887,0.33156773,0.0013101085,0.0005338645,0.12718114,0.48871642,0.00026019904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99778444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18756843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18756843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2753266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94230545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757418413","doi":"10.29173/mlj992","title":"Beyond Finality: R v Hart and the Ghosts of Convictions Past","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04547843127892877,"score_gpt":0.32821503313180866,"score_spread":0.2827366018528799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757418413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07044689,0.0085764695,0.0038246526,0.59145373,0.0034453024,0.00008061147,0.0001781607,0.00007861767,0.3219156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7761838,0.002967882,0.0014158642,0.16125564,0.0016384746,0.000051323794,0.0000835377,0.00006538447,0.056338016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931364,0.0022462641,0.00024552806,0.0010428898,0.0016428864,0.0016859574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98216486,0.008915627,0.0011797386,0.0014142301,0.00460536,0.0017202211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013764266,0.00026040457,0.00055588933,0.0011549388,0.017667042,0.0099683255,0.002858738,0.014029433,0.004701698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037771724,0.00050920626,0.0004492298,0.00097364816,0.027746623,0.005212777,0.0040018493,0.017693227,0.0008267156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027480663,0.000023657796,0.0036041043,0.000048211437,0.000021151229,0.0018750918,0.017334342,0.00017729512,0.00013489548,0.8674817,0.09510294,0.014169117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074060335,0.000057544185,0.0069492147,0.0011440673,0.00008474943,0.0016593458,0.027030906,0.0006283597,0.00085749547,0.3613905,0.5999489,0.00017487642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27816215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40315363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7218379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01359462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03420194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55308616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757932447","doi":"","title":"Differentiation of Approachesof Legal Regulation of Rights and Freedomsof Citizens in the Regional Legislation of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.060125091860794184,"score_gpt":0.2798606843094278,"score_spread":0.2197355924486336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757932447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41543788,0.0074058957,0.00770754,0.020585246,0.00008625501,0.00020485203,0.00031809995,0.000035087753,0.5482191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870188,0.0014085149,0.0015107658,0.0007890206,0.000012834162,0.000028284005,0.000045431938,0.000010323579,0.00917599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889402,0.0026379013,0.00023146761,0.00080555095,0.0030606787,0.00432423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216276,0.00337454,0.0004365247,0.000491942,0.0029856164,0.00054856343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069322735,0.0003356492,0.00051538134,0.0048030606,0.014387216,0.012166943,0.002897862,0.003063663,0.006648859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013445651,0.00040557436,0.00085680437,0.0052863266,0.021473583,0.003240023,0.0038783206,0.0033231038,0.00017914853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026430627,0.000022923856,0.0054749716,0.00008034144,0.00003001081,0.00009679436,0.015562622,0.00068719906,0.00032925885,0.9608207,0.0015416432,0.015327241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010447181,0.0001331055,0.18974294,0.002441774,0.0008160367,0.0003474449,0.18198605,0.0071586235,0.004970961,0.26100135,0.35099533,0.0003018901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97265303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12758471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12758471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15728484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9256962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757998191","doi":"","title":"Why Don't We Have the Same Driving Laws All Across Canada?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04726410821943143,"score_gpt":0.3370061482359869,"score_spread":0.28974204001655546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757998191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088599175,0.012395308,0.0028243773,0.8271823,0.004646038,0.00012645613,0.0025182175,0.0002128083,0.06149525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5789982,0.007851473,0.005574889,0.36735967,0.0007810096,0.000107817315,0.0012128811,0.00028470965,0.037829384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97961813,0.0015562735,0.000739017,0.0023885777,0.008398914,0.007299114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93454605,0.0036244625,0.0022177098,0.0015960097,0.042348687,0.01566711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010850234,0.0005265644,0.0011276857,0.0027142589,0.022345884,0.010328962,0.0045065656,0.0071295686,0.011243956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044614576,0.0007968207,0.0012431121,0.0047873203,0.0097715445,0.0062060105,0.0028454603,0.01391591,0.00091757043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027350994,0.00030015464,0.14050324,0.0007314056,0.0008212888,0.0011167201,0.010505086,0.0014134736,0.0011963765,0.15202166,0.52610815,0.16500893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025840322,0.00014458878,0.22170112,0.0023669596,0.0009610874,0.00070870447,0.037979923,0.0015922226,0.0015029272,0.03244696,0.6996607,0.0006763365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99555874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99799395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09271492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09271492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33876747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67269695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759548624","doi":"","title":"Public acts of the Province of British Columbia ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History; Political science","score_opus":0.02771289158840725,"score_gpt":0.23230732494993322,"score_spread":0.20459443336152597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759548624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0268027,0.022778666,0.00038984156,0.019233242,0.0013746998,0.0001851953,0.2281471,0.0004858971,0.70060265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083126925,0.01035188,0.00040077895,0.0013375118,0.000100538455,0.0000810367,0.026032537,0.00011733506,0.87845147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994665,0.000029268664,0.000024557012,0.00003875627,0.0002667827,0.00017422426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822813,0.00016065649,0.00009712617,0.000049278166,0.0012443453,0.00022054002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028705655,0.0005351699,0.00033496512,0.0038249376,0.0044453694,0.0024892467,0.0011120759,0.0010152309,0.0740773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023764183,0.0005388203,0.00017732414,0.009426395,0.0006872598,0.000723769,0.00060691213,0.0010899013,0.009656841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023025887,0.000011566257,0.005251865,0.00026010495,0.000007665665,0.00008819942,0.00084082136,0.00016390337,0.00007193432,0.0039034986,0.95145404,0.037923332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009720893,0.000009824587,0.13449904,0.000486604,0.00001796886,0.00006959527,0.0051439027,0.00027909188,0.0001964494,0.00059212756,0.8586604,0.00003525817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99835724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0740773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031807654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06511798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24781328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759909679","doi":"","title":"Update '94: what's new in the law?: Calgary, Alberta, June 17, 1994, Edmonton, Alberta, June 20, 1994.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01592067519406207,"score_gpt":0.25243587210328444,"score_spread":0.23651519690922237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759909679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000942838,0.3725366,0.0009661499,0.1286986,0.042760707,0.00025420732,0.016516749,0.0013964493,0.43592775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031571456,0.071944006,0.0010301356,0.010974948,0.0026523331,0.000079253165,0.004224738,0.00026701175,0.90567046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978192,0.00010256438,0.00010467809,0.00014105524,0.001507463,0.0003250205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964728,0.00030771596,0.00013129375,0.00010615825,0.0024872501,0.00049487315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995572,0.0016167676,0.0009527362,0.0040345886,0.004420386,0.007125182,0.0031844887,0.0064854696,0.12583767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043459316,0.0010045001,0.0006154434,0.0072712125,0.002287601,0.003026954,0.0017996586,0.0058003757,0.059501506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004958549,0.0000034964792,0.00008007983,0.00004358085,9.762592e-7,0.000015017568,0.00003756403,0.000018358562,0.000012804222,0.00028194368,0.9869256,0.012575639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034692782,0.0000021120604,0.0017375781,0.00020915872,0.0000039539063,0.000020718173,0.00019408067,0.000013459591,0.000020239431,0.00016662854,0.99762136,0.0000070818037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88909096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12583767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029825335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04316745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42096895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759974795","doi":"","title":"The Canadian justice system : an overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06351832421984444,"score_gpt":0.3109475986053553,"score_spread":0.24742927438551088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759974795","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002829116,0.6747892,0.0014883146,0.061052356,0.0039677885,0.00030321899,0.0067451475,0.00031221085,0.24851269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02658034,0.87484914,0.003161201,0.0076673855,0.0015485707,0.00015830126,0.003196473,0.00016586887,0.0826728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945156,0.0003022528,0.00019779583,0.0002710881,0.0033739146,0.0013392683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942808,0.000447683,0.00018119106,0.00006573085,0.0042026998,0.0008217716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002596028,0.0022710671,0.0011892125,0.034329306,0.010973464,0.013879394,0.0033038885,0.0037727167,0.022317372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050881626,0.0011831429,0.0011148821,0.06526361,0.0051875836,0.0049541174,0.0027905367,0.0026730872,0.0028752896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021051877,0.000052606287,0.0022022366,0.002855226,0.0000366574,0.00019988557,0.0013599363,0.0007455316,0.00014032611,0.08037605,0.74095774,0.17105275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003534077,0.0000069603607,0.0076695746,0.0010979302,0.000021217367,0.00010902331,0.001079301,0.0001312675,0.000035254674,0.003206628,0.98659456,0.000044749388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99709296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21465172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21465172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39892215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91089267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760474255","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1312","title":"Punitive in Effect: Reflections on Canada v. Whaling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Whaling; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.13946561486101672,"score_gpt":0.41382715313013757,"score_spread":0.27436153826912085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760474255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037190724,0.08055967,0.0010614169,0.7016024,0.0031362278,0.00008864501,0.00072617014,0.00005021993,0.17558454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42091933,0.06373323,0.0011964744,0.4795269,0.0013467137,0.000073912044,0.0002738025,0.00007907485,0.032850463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850914,0.002451589,0.00052122795,0.0012043403,0.006929185,0.0038021884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980925,0.009636871,0.0008111824,0.0003212705,0.006684091,0.0016214638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011335274,0.0005951605,0.001003207,0.002816154,0.019772248,0.01060527,0.005878064,0.014135579,0.0042841663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02361499,0.00067183014,0.00093893195,0.00469122,0.01930907,0.0038703193,0.002878845,0.019404398,0.0003878858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013453056,0.00010411273,0.009263897,0.0008656223,0.00013841373,0.0034600515,0.023663202,0.00079920806,0.0008107783,0.5584246,0.34347105,0.058864616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014095788,0.000101260404,0.03203883,0.0025384403,0.0003651918,0.0007153368,0.041225556,0.0005551605,0.0012412985,0.057909805,0.8627874,0.0003807649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98878676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99605453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091229856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091229856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19663556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66192204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760898809","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Evidence Revolution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.05757881699764225,"score_gpt":0.3145149915663895,"score_spread":0.2569361745687473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760898809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006114482,0.009439308,0.0011084948,0.7675579,0.011639705,0.00014358929,0.001951768,0.00018310071,0.20186168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11277288,0.005845378,0.003133096,0.5579809,0.004901955,0.00022018712,0.0008197842,0.00026026872,0.31406546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9444846,0.0042603905,0.0014048578,0.004481633,0.03698027,0.008388301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92454964,0.01826753,0.0014939114,0.004233344,0.03899306,0.012462495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02261601,0.0013199911,0.001933592,0.0072489497,0.019915665,0.030219056,0.006375295,0.03339374,0.029157925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09151972,0.0017382593,0.0027060234,0.0053347657,0.019726373,0.0066238404,0.007293088,0.028149335,0.003187531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073801464,0.000047557918,0.0009734179,0.00011010499,0.00006878633,0.00019771894,0.0005074647,0.00032975618,0.000116590774,0.3291404,0.6550807,0.013353763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098597775,0.000019350375,0.0032458254,0.00026473243,0.00006952831,0.00005437209,0.00043020706,0.0003380694,0.00023789535,0.028324813,0.9668355,0.00008099216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97933733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98279256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15297006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15297006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4553961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761177664","doi":"","title":"Practical statutes being a collection of statutes of practical utility in force in Ontario, with notes on the construction [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statute of limitations; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05534061644859097,"score_gpt":0.31583801123410676,"score_spread":0.2604973947855158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761177664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002942306,0.009492366,0.006171839,0.018637242,0.0014880396,0.00034070417,0.008255451,0.0004714959,0.9522006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04097141,0.009124202,0.007197972,0.005775997,0.00041114155,0.0002742354,0.004118248,0.00023913923,0.9318876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744236,0.00020393665,0.00015188855,0.00020810755,0.0016543843,0.00033935663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978436,0.00043411998,0.0001351771,0.0001643823,0.0012811128,0.00014162142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016001627,0.00058115454,0.0003743373,0.0025302542,0.007023598,0.004761403,0.0013309289,0.0025987802,0.027741406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050558588,0.0006398223,0.0004866878,0.0066148667,0.007428253,0.0029405958,0.0016126903,0.0024015491,0.006820508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012978909,0.000011383109,0.000598836,0.0002299211,0.0000044587946,0.000106668114,0.0030984697,0.00021189661,0.00021637291,0.34234387,0.61926955,0.033895593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027520198,0.000004322794,0.0024141131,0.00009692993,0.0000035924716,0.00004027487,0.00053040305,0.00006163921,0.00008365139,0.0074416064,0.9893065,0.000014247307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88883287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9624887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11116713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031683818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06999012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22988325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762100885","doi":"","title":"Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.05040988705811547,"score_gpt":0.31326511768894577,"score_spread":0.26285523063083027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762100885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09900193,0.014913566,0.0013707542,0.5007259,0.0031699783,0.0010718863,0.0059993886,0.00014800884,0.37359858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6687278,0.014438797,0.005563295,0.06080948,0.001369513,0.0006951407,0.0025772483,0.00012075213,0.24569795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856908,0.0012892109,0.00065800844,0.00062947266,0.008428559,0.0033040438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94841605,0.0075513315,0.0018215543,0.0013338396,0.03192199,0.008955207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008271997,0.00037235025,0.00050282007,0.0040847184,0.015178239,0.0075028148,0.001741554,0.0055168844,0.006101392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028597433,0.0006386924,0.0005822589,0.0040175486,0.0061565535,0.0016030999,0.0039159134,0.0043885116,0.0003736932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006446741,0.000058412443,0.03648449,0.00046223056,0.000056316785,0.0004290243,0.012625226,0.00071453204,0.0006427389,0.12017756,0.7865579,0.041726965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006238791,0.00004127937,0.16701564,0.0012638089,0.0001636815,0.000118346856,0.010915114,0.000657905,0.0004623381,0.007851701,0.8112984,0.00014945956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8793905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12060949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47051597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8750872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762203183","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Manitoba : passed in the sessions held in the ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.036981732594829834,"score_gpt":0.2855283085431455,"score_spread":0.24854657594831564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762203183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018531905,0.0231885,0.001397701,0.06316706,0.007016995,0.00063723186,0.06527866,0.0012337138,0.81954813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048690446,0.00548128,0.0020796002,0.010747026,0.00025919988,0.00029781417,0.007053376,0.00021109507,0.9251802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990381,0.000058957572,0.00003806028,0.00008763716,0.0004791069,0.00029812224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817646,0.00014344651,0.00006348335,0.00006781183,0.0012897376,0.00025901047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759881,0.0006038515,0.00045303174,0.0029765887,0.0077381916,0.0032570765,0.0018902887,0.0024490545,0.047747295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028505994,0.0007935049,0.00042421158,0.005437957,0.0020200894,0.0010335097,0.0013051454,0.0029465002,0.00906138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029790272,0.000034474342,0.002672759,0.00013280127,0.000007978258,0.00008702479,0.0016869624,0.000092357855,0.00038646563,0.03756667,0.9355312,0.021771522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011488421,0.000008778079,0.019532211,0.00018907427,0.000011035627,0.000033647535,0.0016647662,0.00007207342,0.00032379033,0.0013852363,0.97674316,0.00002477819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97335047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99270916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96593016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03406981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10209866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24719489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762417814","doi":"","title":"Alberta Law Conference: [papers]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02666860447666757,"score_gpt":0.2635985025117345,"score_spread":0.23692989803506692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762417814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026065274,0.016406903,0.00037215417,0.07817396,0.045436166,0.0003804997,0.007630302,0.00082382315,0.84816974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037651784,0.0015729554,0.00014527288,0.0037197657,0.0016254312,0.000033551307,0.00095082796,0.00008406794,0.988103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774796,0.0000736787,0.00004778274,0.0001730092,0.0013073513,0.00065014616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974934,0.00011756458,0.000040420346,0.000093120165,0.0016581416,0.0005973976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015686383,0.0012180917,0.00082059886,0.0033373197,0.008966003,0.010006312,0.0027528952,0.008224137,0.2322122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031941314,0.0007120513,0.00095856475,0.0039614006,0.001611932,0.0019697675,0.0016271145,0.004693921,0.057976995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012841346,0.000015099335,0.000080715356,0.000025301051,0.0000025559273,0.000022436578,0.000021595573,0.000040549126,0.000030542713,0.0014418705,0.99177414,0.0065322043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010592974,0.000006020885,0.0018432504,0.00006255254,0.0000071839613,0.000009679622,0.000116242416,0.000043413882,0.00005953252,0.00062823034,0.9972029,0.000010451346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7769466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9492834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2322122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029864285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05807241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7768272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762635708","doi":"10.7202/1021634ar","title":"La légalité du boycottage","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.035407117974855594,"score_gpt":0.2918102839284494,"score_spread":0.2564031659535938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762635708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014571724,0.007303898,0.008150081,0.040704098,0.0013185049,0.0000518018,0.00020201347,0.00007784631,0.9276201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56818354,0.0061511844,0.0027973864,0.025267936,0.0013320592,0.0002600453,0.00018779395,0.00022808077,0.395592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840222,0.004021949,0.0005216192,0.0032444315,0.005352957,0.0028367874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963437,0.00130101,0.0005406299,0.00037632533,0.0010114696,0.0004268159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057049524,0.00047375562,0.0006323122,0.0011901525,0.016293107,0.0129931215,0.0025006759,0.0075814514,0.02270747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012404797,0.00084438775,0.00050516083,0.0020736537,0.026004236,0.0054412307,0.008337904,0.015666118,0.0031080833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030115434,0.0000037619031,0.000083804705,0.0000132964515,0.0000014430084,0.00014565137,0.0025218376,0.00004600377,0.00006314778,0.9836956,0.010847746,0.0025747775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012702018,0.000021617494,0.00085018197,0.0003773327,0.0000067488863,0.00026928936,0.0032437008,0.00024727744,0.0002654552,0.07807347,0.91659564,0.00003668258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15013063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12485889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15013063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017390205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017425029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29851353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762669912","doi":"","title":"City of Ontario v. Quon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cases | US Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.09876655245041216,"score_gpt":0.34246684105417313,"score_spread":0.24370028860376097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762669912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031265713,0.0020302264,0.0004286393,0.03357383,0.00066390814,0.00028911073,0.0037503536,0.000110327135,0.9278879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21886334,0.0021168664,0.00054914114,0.02250673,0.00020045918,0.00016624706,0.0014050527,0.00007464171,0.75411755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970823,0.00012541589,0.000057096855,0.00017884788,0.0012713864,0.0012850103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751925,0.00034204917,0.00013516887,0.00010858296,0.0012253165,0.00066966814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010570806,0.000510572,0.0003621168,0.0012398663,0.01782423,0.004282269,0.0013024916,0.0047367937,0.031170223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039052314,0.00072671706,0.0006265882,0.0019134069,0.0021010072,0.0010757314,0.0017161148,0.0024163797,0.0028921363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023827545,0.00004547003,0.02465374,0.00034585787,0.00006243114,0.002009125,0.0038970644,0.0002909792,0.0014605756,0.10972626,0.8351408,0.022129439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011612865,0.000043860804,0.04848484,0.00026627153,0.00011795427,0.00024229087,0.0033603054,0.0003947593,0.00095776276,0.0038979687,0.94204104,0.00007670009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05094866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08836716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36966014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763731455","doi":"","title":"The ... annotated Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01357245597307617,"score_gpt":0.23841083858503903,"score_spread":0.22483838261196287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763731455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073367404,0.03741262,0.0022440602,0.027986929,0.009686826,0.00014114431,0.020814788,0.0005023068,0.9004776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01073139,0.018323753,0.002983759,0.004148998,0.0007907671,0.000096998214,0.005808576,0.0004305257,0.9566852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977748,0.000101508136,0.000055231456,0.00016079503,0.0015520625,0.0003556425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702734,0.00023526834,0.00006626626,0.00011704238,0.002330031,0.00022399248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010727692,0.0011991075,0.00085764,0.008836289,0.009847405,0.006650796,0.0020816084,0.0019086428,0.10265183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003845889,0.00061134,0.00060748565,0.016819261,0.004421929,0.0029474027,0.0012797292,0.003655276,0.022445375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041292874,0.0000018091274,0.0000459371,0.00004130644,7.361984e-7,0.000012619855,0.00018852844,0.000045217148,0.00002094267,0.025827002,0.961531,0.0122807035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.296833e-7,6.50944e-7,0.00038185494,0.00006760031,0.0000010379541,0.000014018155,0.00015573323,0.000019466735,0.00002029387,0.0015105493,0.99782073,0.0000073734227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96746695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98656946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10265183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05755328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106880955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4175802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763859269","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law handbook: leading statements, principles and precedents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.047140691831844085,"score_gpt":0.31503301295929304,"score_spread":0.26789232112744893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763859269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007107903,0.029238857,0.0057918285,0.021876793,0.002750654,0.00047268526,0.016873546,0.001360915,0.9209239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015650818,0.0412311,0.022341752,0.008530188,0.0007613322,0.0004971619,0.012020411,0.00086501904,0.89810234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931297,0.0002833223,0.00021804689,0.00032558898,0.0054300446,0.0006132639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197173,0.0012398403,0.00017410288,0.00033199377,0.005776837,0.0005054874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003491002,0.0010812578,0.00090089685,0.0118313255,0.010001694,0.010452639,0.0038862682,0.003500683,0.11971701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013125347,0.0013112313,0.0005865842,0.01739867,0.005085458,0.0034492395,0.0013508166,0.0042487686,0.024309088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032469732,0.000007029466,0.00007406735,0.00012696513,0.0000018716811,0.000017101154,0.00031678609,0.00010876424,0.000052738145,0.08665332,0.8776931,0.034944933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022274303,0.0000010260774,0.00031223198,0.00015779115,0.0000023832772,0.000011750541,0.00014450676,0.00004113728,0.00003386818,0.0066282037,0.9926523,0.000012497833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96038204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98442566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11971701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07583689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27446702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5502377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764285637","doi":"","title":"All about law : exploring the Canadian legal system","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05427303569610364,"score_gpt":0.26497195718237526,"score_spread":0.21069892148627162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764285637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022242948,0.019081747,0.0019802467,0.12411584,0.000729015,0.00012236918,0.0021106943,0.00009394243,0.8295232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70704496,0.057349622,0.008965099,0.021444224,0.00046536635,0.00024483836,0.0018156561,0.00031777035,0.20235248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585426,0.0005299476,0.000083054816,0.00027003288,0.0017671668,0.001495548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490273,0.0012111646,0.00017979657,0.00014411214,0.0025125863,0.0010495521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024772696,0.0008208401,0.000608661,0.008962122,0.027232913,0.020781495,0.0034538896,0.0033754492,0.028613003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010979702,0.00061713567,0.000733568,0.019714078,0.017983481,0.008394742,0.0034485206,0.003891975,0.0011255891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113079195,0.000015552854,0.002698869,0.00018880083,0.000012189404,0.00014598806,0.018269483,0.000540637,0.00008325363,0.7795973,0.16080332,0.037633255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010056989,0.00000935704,0.016879465,0.0007695248,0.000052500534,0.00011692815,0.06556483,0.0010787876,0.00010683972,0.12834056,0.78697884,0.00009223748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99850625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26064372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26064372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4271227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8575485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765488684","doi":"","title":"The 1999 annotated Canadian charter of rights and freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013591256133573561,"score_gpt":0.23786283903416694,"score_spread":0.22427158290059337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765488684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012399215,0.018416086,0.0024651964,0.025534283,0.0071958005,0.00025685976,0.02816783,0.00033272378,0.9163914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020627076,0.019769905,0.006593158,0.007160014,0.0008378471,0.0003168297,0.01070678,0.00043577634,0.9335526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584705,0.00023521314,0.00016655934,0.0002840233,0.0028429637,0.00062416523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939679,0.00047958296,0.00012531684,0.0002430371,0.0049201683,0.00026393155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022660021,0.0012590141,0.0007958781,0.01287587,0.010734367,0.009143354,0.0025487076,0.002634875,0.047000315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008206234,0.0008298173,0.00066997623,0.020752434,0.005611372,0.0033778034,0.0014865239,0.0050010267,0.007719209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057583397,0.0000041681683,0.00009514241,0.00006653663,0.000001296313,0.0000177951,0.00037304813,0.000083046834,0.000022032184,0.09191273,0.8925743,0.014844243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011861729,7.198167e-7,0.0005004731,0.00009774767,0.0000016423163,0.000008899114,0.00020541508,0.000021229522,0.000023276256,0.0024220392,0.9967084,0.000008957141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99252313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098428756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098428756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20137173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71415395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765582690","doi":"","title":"All about law : exploring the Canadian legal system","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05427303569610364,"score_gpt":0.26497195718237526,"score_spread":0.21069892148627162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765582690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022242948,0.019081747,0.0019802467,0.12411584,0.000729015,0.00012236918,0.0021106943,0.00009394243,0.8295232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70704496,0.057349622,0.008965099,0.021444224,0.00046536635,0.00024483836,0.0018156561,0.00031777035,0.20235248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585426,0.0005299476,0.000083054816,0.00027003288,0.0017671668,0.001495548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490273,0.0012111646,0.00017979657,0.00014411214,0.0025125863,0.0010495521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024772696,0.0008208401,0.000608661,0.008962122,0.027232913,0.020781495,0.0034538896,0.0033754492,0.028613003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010979702,0.00061713567,0.000733568,0.019714078,0.017983481,0.008394742,0.0034485206,0.003891975,0.0011255891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113079195,0.000015552854,0.002698869,0.00018880083,0.000012189404,0.00014598806,0.018269483,0.000540637,0.00008325363,0.7795973,0.16080332,0.037633255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010056989,0.00000935704,0.016879465,0.0007695248,0.000052500534,0.00011692815,0.06556483,0.0010787876,0.00010683972,0.12834056,0.78697884,0.00009223748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99850625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26064372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26064372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4271227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8575485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765742902","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1332","title":"Henry v British Columbia: Still Seeking a Just Approach to Damages for Wrongful Conviction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Conviction; Political science; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Charter; Wrongful death","score_opus":0.06746170237539233,"score_gpt":0.3345962879397789,"score_spread":0.2671345855643866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765742902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08484426,0.018144256,0.004069051,0.3192726,0.0026167755,0.00016703372,0.00027493306,0.00021085519,0.5704001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7289434,0.007580772,0.0028326276,0.12669703,0.00054140226,0.00010758668,0.00013141379,0.000085492764,0.13308029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400556,0.00077731954,0.00020313321,0.0006034455,0.0024357801,0.0019748176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655294,0.0011708603,0.0001377662,0.00019790108,0.0011964719,0.00074409676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002890745,0.0004460801,0.00036727343,0.001081841,0.01702585,0.013112155,0.002187046,0.009858957,0.004138627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011731247,0.00053304975,0.00025700522,0.0010659844,0.013200015,0.0030009255,0.0033364522,0.014060071,0.00049366924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042441978,0.000034791832,0.0036999956,0.00015927685,0.000030047719,0.0020528173,0.012400212,0.0006491691,0.001473434,0.76553184,0.16382486,0.050101154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009491103,0.000082314866,0.017480485,0.0014234126,0.000110473695,0.0011531302,0.0210889,0.0010937381,0.0019675188,0.11537003,0.8396834,0.00045159593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95127106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98246044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048728943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047340184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10135029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34347868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765911270","doi":"","title":"Crankshaw's Criminal code of Canada; a commentary on the Criminal law of Canada including an appendix containing all relevant [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05093558450218146,"score_gpt":0.285345178579715,"score_spread":0.2344095940775335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765911270","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027800442,0.097727686,0.0013230274,0.4346592,0.025792614,0.00027691806,0.010421501,0.00025304419,0.42676604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04901588,0.0363072,0.0023306916,0.2101966,0.0033799394,0.00035176252,0.002607968,0.00037069648,0.6954393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606067,0.00034119512,0.00013278077,0.00021064932,0.0024591917,0.0007955291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367166,0.0013345863,0.00020845584,0.00009253931,0.004145094,0.00054762175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016544366,0.0010398839,0.0006588073,0.0030362266,0.020244053,0.005990009,0.0028520175,0.010199446,0.019690238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012165521,0.000762996,0.0007280775,0.0051448923,0.005025523,0.0022876018,0.0012948212,0.0093364995,0.0040140986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003765353,0.0000024252267,0.00006508873,0.00003216903,0.000001233772,0.000028538558,0.0002941294,0.000029858933,0.000015955335,0.010870041,0.9865971,0.0020597312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006912071,0.000003403248,0.0026259306,0.00031631978,0.000009044603,0.000035672318,0.0011750998,0.00006795029,0.00010488597,0.003111184,0.99250096,0.000042747786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07255022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07255022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16808772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52639115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766005526","doi":"","title":"Digest Canadian case law : 1900-1911","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02665911487579928,"score_gpt":0.2655692158513737,"score_spread":0.23891010097557444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766005526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016633061,0.030609101,0.00044513712,0.028385669,0.006982131,0.00020406868,0.0064627137,0.0001386432,0.92510927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012026244,0.01101867,0.00045073667,0.005633435,0.0009149301,0.000079829515,0.0016543578,0.00009126125,0.9681305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716634,0.00013080754,0.00008961756,0.00028662416,0.0017400683,0.00058658374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669003,0.000398821,0.00006645512,0.0001394407,0.0022788616,0.00042634178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002058576,0.0011463189,0.0005929676,0.010242214,0.01213277,0.008665366,0.0023998294,0.0068554063,0.10166925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008217128,0.0011967762,0.00078918587,0.009839277,0.004669145,0.0029955304,0.0021738333,0.0057121846,0.016883502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065569,0.000011431979,0.00015274799,0.000052693333,0.0000020353086,0.000034721546,0.0002622321,0.00005038593,0.000025495488,0.041040048,0.94728786,0.011073743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033040192,0.000001453485,0.0011421142,0.00009620225,0.0000029913128,0.000027694545,0.00016489207,0.000027603495,0.000023958375,0.0019678662,0.99653184,0.0000100159605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97430146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99094766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12152389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12152389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14467236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766119890","doi":"10.71781/1844","title":"État de droit et lutte antiterroriste : étude parallèle des systèmes juridiques français et canadien quant à la collecte et au partage des renseignements","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.07824659693397171,"score_gpt":0.3888743734554714,"score_spread":0.31062777652149964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766119890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86877704,0.017817685,0.0033308242,0.0120294355,0.00038711765,0.0004301121,0.0224835,0.00023978093,0.07450442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681229,0.004536293,0.0012917883,0.00087187235,0.00007417519,0.00029739054,0.0045450726,0.00007465058,0.020185927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902497,0.002041647,0.0008481531,0.0012583908,0.002913667,0.002688523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641811,0.008245559,0.0069542723,0.0012639416,0.015911613,0.00344344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008636017,0.0005663,0.00094150746,0.006841675,0.004994904,0.0072809495,0.001449653,0.0012376616,0.014197724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02839429,0.0006330482,0.0012070254,0.013855665,0.0025591517,0.0034070474,0.0040819086,0.002589422,0.0012921626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003809825,0.00010817892,0.84964085,0.0011377243,0.0005797835,0.000365633,0.04239136,0.0015409807,0.0002942524,0.019745378,0.013878254,0.06993654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002567327,0.00007469855,0.9122197,0.00070755114,0.00018164366,0.00014456242,0.025953801,0.000536575,0.00023942368,0.0008597038,0.058969334,0.00008741528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.888519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8817535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11148101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041907717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06500511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30406314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766247746","doi":"","title":"Ipeelee et le devoir de résistance (Ipeelee and the Duty to Resist)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.01270681140432618,"score_gpt":0.2912106568454974,"score_spread":0.27850384544117124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766247746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10820464,0.0046693366,0.00892484,0.04514431,0.00044451098,0.000075497526,0.000085036554,0.000048810223,0.83240294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089147,0.0008640128,0.0007417527,0.0048397626,0.00013658743,0.000048853864,0.000018560175,0.00004795905,0.084387854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899093,0.005051262,0.00023141706,0.0011289446,0.0016867699,0.0019923474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648356,0.0019527582,0.00036748973,0.000328493,0.00058280915,0.0002848189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00616129,0.00038327096,0.0002955122,0.0008412793,0.008697075,0.009647059,0.00092018425,0.0049314057,0.009537357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008738562,0.00025327227,0.00038443133,0.0009253651,0.021035563,0.004165971,0.004092347,0.0061793756,0.0012034429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019486894,0.000008443899,0.0006255343,0.00004988697,0.000004339733,0.00023267053,0.0461569,0.0001122973,0.00028226612,0.9353738,0.007326193,0.009808154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020727746,0.00008925241,0.0060015577,0.00054093637,0.000023183002,0.00049971935,0.050536834,0.0004723403,0.0013029885,0.10801589,0.83242416,0.00007236765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044214517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04209137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044214517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010371921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068550105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08791435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766297629","doi":"10.1017/9781108333436.016","title":"The European Court of Human Rights and the Canadian Case Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.04210361219989183,"score_gpt":0.25287147148181116,"score_spread":0.21076785928191932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766297629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026385963,0.017295452,0.0005053612,0.02694405,0.0006259346,0.000025331103,0.00015300667,0.000016375308,0.95179594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31122288,0.023641706,0.002111964,0.027881796,0.00067205145,0.000106128435,0.0003524799,0.000116175506,0.6338948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368966,0.0007817926,0.000097922275,0.00044806482,0.0028757404,0.0021067145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981511,0.00060737913,0.000058634523,0.0001294557,0.0007571885,0.00029607618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036543857,0.00077337865,0.0005971498,0.003169739,0.013612664,0.011630011,0.0023517758,0.008725449,0.01674438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009250062,0.0005085398,0.0007363721,0.0048631323,0.016476873,0.0043126214,0.003104054,0.005837708,0.001323163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068277973,0.00000392469,0.00008810806,0.000026863907,0.0000024854683,0.000065675595,0.0005322578,0.000117998345,0.000018006254,0.93684536,0.056345668,0.0059469203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016818945,0.000004803742,0.0019200204,0.000608916,0.000017157312,0.00015978218,0.001733023,0.00039401953,0.00009068198,0.23912503,0.7558851,0.000044666085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9514351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.973503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09892605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09892605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095033124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7177621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766345990","doi":"","title":"Canada statute annotations : R.S.C. 1970 edition : being a compilation of case annotations to the Revised statutes covering [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02131715114395199,"score_gpt":0.264937140476401,"score_spread":0.243619989332449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766345990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001729077,0.012527446,0.006730173,0.032313965,0.014275031,0.0005367824,0.18331529,0.0042363117,0.74433595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010066334,0.010185493,0.011494706,0.007973484,0.0009650709,0.0003376044,0.06532977,0.0019824407,0.8916651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940018,0.00017746682,0.00019713864,0.00029920303,0.004688769,0.0006355379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847134,0.0008638709,0.00030837432,0.0004585182,0.013248617,0.0004072477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020185248,0.0013282589,0.00097472104,0.010215547,0.009047997,0.005668204,0.0030072152,0.0031223912,0.10455676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012028186,0.0010879956,0.00089492596,0.01874354,0.0029017075,0.0026553352,0.0013369439,0.0041993135,0.055809975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036999375,0.0000027904846,0.000057608853,0.000043962344,8.5628204e-7,0.000010883819,0.00012010221,0.000038954277,0.000043011136,0.0051353853,0.9869443,0.0075983927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016113084,9.801155e-7,0.00074338866,0.0000865067,0.0000026843018,0.000015882144,0.0000948714,0.00002922469,0.00009223778,0.0006809219,0.9982381,0.00001364106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98739153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10455676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061199445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16380093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4440351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766395255","doi":"","title":"Digest of reported cases touching the criminal law of Canada : with references to the statutes and an index.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Index (typography); Statute; Criminal law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03597540531136806,"score_gpt":0.2769291324209339,"score_spread":0.24095372710956586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766395255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00844793,0.10551731,0.0014904899,0.010420747,0.0057196887,0.00058632536,0.42192903,0.0015722374,0.44431624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028389564,0.12302527,0.0035235132,0.004349902,0.0014600497,0.00022381854,0.20049198,0.0005423317,0.63799363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991628,0.000018618675,0.00004447542,0.00004206657,0.00061626785,0.00011580391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965301,0.00029653445,0.000245002,0.00008666147,0.0025977427,0.0002440138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039373152,0.0008791475,0.00058877206,0.015309588,0.0022724268,0.0021845584,0.0015204491,0.00079944567,0.0761162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027271698,0.00040142226,0.00044525703,0.03240003,0.00080032914,0.0009571658,0.0008084907,0.0007237442,0.01861487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012961546,0.000009656375,0.00046323403,0.000431963,0.0000046164505,0.0000614345,0.00014914275,0.000058294183,0.00013520496,0.0007668398,0.97090536,0.02700125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035656228,0.000005384017,0.01407659,0.0005204458,0.000010921736,0.00017516107,0.0003583925,0.00004766249,0.00015728704,0.00031021715,0.9843205,0.00001388982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9277939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9674161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0761162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016835881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036899492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25463408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766780520","doi":"","title":"Foundations of criminal and civil law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminology; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025065075741016758,"score_gpt":0.25852150653741407,"score_spread":0.2334564307963973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766780520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008316089,0.049946215,0.003841078,0.10716532,0.0012465981,0.000125298,0.0016030666,0.0001497203,0.8276065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5375924,0.098827444,0.010153691,0.011849574,0.0012019182,0.00021151813,0.0010352639,0.00021006863,0.33891806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962447,0.00045311576,0.00010998518,0.00031031846,0.0017916025,0.0010902052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255073,0.0016558768,0.00024302848,0.00022946912,0.0041466695,0.0011742231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021751286,0.0007014246,0.00082838105,0.0067867753,0.015792305,0.017344665,0.002669731,0.0037153545,0.025097655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009818533,0.0009012926,0.0005834283,0.010442302,0.016084353,0.00436933,0.0022726408,0.0051361937,0.0011983892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005782483,0.000015091611,0.00072246935,0.000073661584,0.000009151499,0.000065282016,0.0012584885,0.0006602859,0.00002335676,0.8947879,0.08512275,0.017255846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013301982,0.000007793372,0.0065808943,0.0006360881,0.000030857267,0.0000763901,0.0036865775,0.0019555297,0.00008764468,0.3517848,0.6350708,0.000069322465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99732983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76065236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23934764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4299237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88224894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767390495","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment : index to Canadian legal literature, 1985-1986","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.015509346898178043,"score_gpt":0.25934072108219713,"score_spread":0.2438313741840191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767390495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001908201,0.42869717,0.0005009263,0.021614637,0.009552655,0.0001724036,0.07875417,0.0004890419,0.45831084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02115295,0.3361433,0.0021166743,0.003990049,0.0014467664,0.0001548872,0.02317857,0.00025072767,0.61156607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998324,0.000040875897,0.000092996874,0.00011167652,0.0011433773,0.00028713758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565613,0.00022605757,0.00014482287,0.00006194343,0.003467226,0.00044380213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007620019,0.00154165,0.0010825127,0.03216486,0.008600118,0.006991222,0.0024174454,0.0014883121,0.11922988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050354684,0.0006792516,0.0006007055,0.07545206,0.0026681114,0.0035532909,0.002028498,0.0014739999,0.020516818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008004484,0.0000045447437,0.00026100533,0.00039734223,0.0000030055196,0.000025425728,0.00027695936,0.000043439326,0.00002145957,0.0039392593,0.963741,0.03127846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014296451,7.547522e-7,0.0019659968,0.00036914748,0.000004709731,0.000019756826,0.000303197,0.000010498086,0.000013786768,0.00034553334,0.9969585,0.0000067323986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98735887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11922988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10021034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20069301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72708035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767505135","doi":"","title":"Les écueils du contentieux antidiscriminatoire au prisme de la jurisprudence canadienne","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.024869839325445262,"score_gpt":0.27117490918214304,"score_spread":0.24630506985669778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767505135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040109187,0.026679335,0.06309075,0.25837618,0.0031146083,0.00013342178,0.0002831257,0.00040419892,0.6078092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88660705,0.009589986,0.024244646,0.013465119,0.0024234566,0.00040894837,0.0001457989,0.00031619982,0.062798776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93554103,0.039359223,0.001751848,0.003990368,0.016791305,0.002566168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.887903,0.08389415,0.0030456646,0.010673771,0.012092609,0.002390882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03833162,0.001288307,0.0018648276,0.006439231,0.010135586,0.028440861,0.0028889354,0.010804848,0.012532452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10118882,0.0013609882,0.0014413986,0.005640368,0.039074477,0.016402364,0.008205102,0.021643335,0.0018754061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012884417,0.000007905328,0.00016765045,0.00004600861,0.0000145762215,0.000052103318,0.001631297,0.00026805824,0.00008398443,0.9930235,0.0012524574,0.003439544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079344,0.00003686884,0.0022176786,0.0006158265,0.000055783807,0.00024393522,0.0031902331,0.0018378329,0.00068778876,0.7992195,0.19175573,0.000059468202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054959066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034742545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94504094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028138606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02328496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20416087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767710311","doi":"","title":"Statutes of British Columbia judicially considered : 1960-1977","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Statute of limitations; Political science; Self-incrimination","score_opus":0.0208517243171804,"score_gpt":0.24862432686304597,"score_spread":0.22777260254586557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767710311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13294291,0.03641782,0.0005184567,0.018370364,0.0021888795,0.00043604817,0.121543325,0.00029132515,0.68729085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25463197,0.014114642,0.0008318312,0.0042658574,0.00031665023,0.00024093433,0.0153463865,0.00015755475,0.71009415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968466,0.00014751553,0.00016593482,0.00027859732,0.0014818892,0.0010794888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933902,0.000789272,0.0003508198,0.00019020548,0.004753121,0.00052650855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011447356,0.0005250018,0.00051338633,0.010761548,0.009523381,0.0053736484,0.0023203758,0.002749376,0.017735029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076002353,0.0011402956,0.00042719732,0.020261165,0.0022800765,0.0012416189,0.0011115485,0.003739424,0.0038080164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017853153,0.000112814254,0.02021474,0.00046278108,0.0000623843,0.00055414776,0.0073298905,0.00071140204,0.0005170501,0.07669373,0.80466187,0.088500686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019865793,0.000013747123,0.17934899,0.0006780787,0.000059735572,0.00008905711,0.0036702289,0.0002823283,0.0006421475,0.0020408942,0.81308055,0.00007439106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09064513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09064513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10845552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6576795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768383290","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Criminal Law Through Civil Processes: How Does Human Rights Law Treat ‘Civil for Criminal Processes’?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Political science; Criminal Conviction; Criminal procedure; Human rights; Procedural law; Conviction; Public law","score_opus":0.04063194723556551,"score_gpt":0.3483867546552124,"score_spread":0.3077548074196469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768383290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0125238225,0.04209701,0.035775986,0.57065,0.0024163597,0.00014621612,0.00010901274,0.00011956755,0.33616206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76277936,0.036594037,0.020421317,0.1521792,0.0033887674,0.0002583002,0.00012809073,0.00023205143,0.024018766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9630632,0.014186457,0.0011230484,0.0038693065,0.011531127,0.006226844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640089,0.021583473,0.0030905167,0.0036477144,0.0058967746,0.0017725533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031432264,0.0009578345,0.0017668584,0.0046513556,0.0108294105,0.028340902,0.004321609,0.01905971,0.0043009724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049418747,0.0007384116,0.0011295113,0.0040910956,0.14499933,0.031458747,0.008360912,0.018393323,0.0012380211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029035064,0.00001296376,0.00023289806,0.000043221808,0.000005221987,0.000030641837,0.0021965283,0.000114432776,0.00002032488,0.9884632,0.0024146915,0.006462984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015803378,0.000017806417,0.0010210203,0.0007461877,0.000014037409,0.00008509163,0.0032663709,0.00030493998,0.000115486815,0.90107363,0.09329386,0.000045806322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27108225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21597275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27108225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026692027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059679527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53900874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769121512","doi":"","title":"Revised statutes of Alberta, 2000 : prepared and published in accordance with the Statute Revision Act.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Statute of limitations; Political science","score_opus":0.011446269487247435,"score_gpt":0.24621287362600933,"score_spread":0.23476660413876188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769121512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00603224,0.024889763,0.0039421557,0.026283635,0.019817406,0.0011889916,0.20422892,0.0036449456,0.70997196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020035712,0.0067802356,0.010447154,0.0072826305,0.0007827079,0.00051272113,0.07085015,0.00049745844,0.88281137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920026,0.00026221512,0.0003762993,0.00033776992,0.0060252743,0.0009958807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816648,0.0012150041,0.00032057436,0.0005925072,0.01556519,0.00064199214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004051845,0.0010973389,0.00086990435,0.0075907465,0.0046973196,0.0076228334,0.0032280444,0.0040668435,0.032995366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014699815,0.0014199277,0.0007917658,0.016850704,0.0022731286,0.0017017963,0.0011950589,0.005100849,0.015998175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625507,0.000021438738,0.00065721705,0.00006715269,0.00000356212,0.000036481983,0.00019212971,0.000201062,0.00008631676,0.00999412,0.9729023,0.015811864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025170442,0.000009218971,0.0130977845,0.00020147947,0.000014954395,0.00003449334,0.00034237024,0.00020407094,0.0002097374,0.0019078313,0.98391056,0.000042277283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9734683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061406992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061406992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20011526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44554102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769775469","doi":"","title":"Public and private acts of British Columbia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.0331771188164451,"score_gpt":0.24134564405365969,"score_spread":0.20816852523721457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769775469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026716275,0.091304444,0.0004679352,0.022034703,0.0026098222,0.00017330445,0.13723783,0.0002899617,0.71916574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10851726,0.022912342,0.0004413205,0.0017991868,0.00023091135,0.00011124022,0.01878337,0.000098318866,0.84710604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992311,0.00004620086,0.000050566745,0.00006982977,0.00036531457,0.00023688623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979954,0.0002435959,0.00011178231,0.00007135705,0.0012982695,0.0002795564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040109392,0.00064988586,0.0004121672,0.0048376396,0.0051524322,0.0029482855,0.0012013733,0.0014829864,0.05162763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003227794,0.0006894259,0.0002247189,0.011573527,0.0010548503,0.0012286912,0.00079607876,0.001937128,0.005820779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004257761,0.000023976849,0.006066406,0.00030071716,0.000010272737,0.00013529097,0.0011969296,0.00021838177,0.000066750836,0.010499659,0.9296153,0.051823646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010871321,0.000013999796,0.1414761,0.00072,0.000028421933,0.00010746916,0.005809781,0.00024087695,0.00019402317,0.0015233055,0.8498327,0.000042483094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99202794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99819845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05162763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039058708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065111786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28339207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770722283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3069932","title":"R. v. Marakah: The Complexities of Standing in the Context of Sent Text Messages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06046030337314867,"score_gpt":0.3580102117230839,"score_spread":0.2975499083499352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770722283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06643882,0.02329576,0.019913727,0.6454957,0.0036274416,0.00014480362,0.00050919864,0.00025821177,0.24031632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8912153,0.009471681,0.007975943,0.05381613,0.00313118,0.00021019102,0.00011297497,0.00017999436,0.033886682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237883,0.004635178,0.00036391488,0.0009218833,0.0010012093,0.00069903774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654168,0.029726336,0.0012021239,0.0011993562,0.0017827493,0.0006727207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008447959,0.0004582402,0.00068171177,0.0016880382,0.0067499653,0.010313346,0.002516415,0.016106743,0.009639823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05979266,0.00050136424,0.00054071104,0.001277253,0.011577325,0.016785316,0.0036846288,0.009333329,0.0017170658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016087126,0.000026016049,0.002043534,0.00021038853,0.000035937293,0.0014844373,0.032583106,0.00026739395,0.00054754864,0.8446068,0.08505478,0.032979216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006701803,0.00007478975,0.008824619,0.001295326,0.00009921402,0.0011781581,0.02825527,0.002562446,0.0017534862,0.7802327,0.1754821,0.00017483356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015195712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019679463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016106743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030627644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004542615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044677615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771226430","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Alberta : consolidated to ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0220611669621233,"score_gpt":0.2753203096689318,"score_spread":0.2532591427068085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771226430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002971772,0.008119927,0.001317724,0.019029746,0.0053930264,0.00026579123,0.067311645,0.0017152581,0.8938751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013485497,0.0037968743,0.0026613537,0.004095464,0.00028301287,0.00012899176,0.021883622,0.0003380588,0.95332706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962812,0.00012026982,0.00009157554,0.00021756357,0.0024726812,0.0008166547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381655,0.0002903339,0.00010326509,0.00020687957,0.0052187643,0.00036402422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014286913,0.0008018288,0.000794786,0.0063776965,0.006411064,0.00641176,0.0024216694,0.0026522458,0.11073981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004932838,0.00079488487,0.00064191176,0.012659202,0.0017350791,0.0014636626,0.0014750964,0.0037253948,0.03109561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017266331,0.00001403419,0.00062167755,0.00007522029,0.0000038258786,0.000033241507,0.00020660218,0.000103892344,0.00006678495,0.020473514,0.95286727,0.025516583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006283859,0.0000027854687,0.0046882886,0.0001058086,0.000006617012,0.00001887031,0.00030112098,0.000087408596,0.00008709631,0.0013318924,0.99334794,0.000015913081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97280407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98732865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11073981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04305813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13335653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37046158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771266232","doi":"","title":"The Socioeconomic implications of Ontario's Joint and Several Liability Arrangement: Insights from Municipal Political Elites in Perth County","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Socioeconomic status; Liability; Political science; Joint (building); Geography; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Population; Engineering; Civil engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.13359524494519337,"score_gpt":0.35393179057192503,"score_spread":0.22033654562673166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771266232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904535,0.0001338433,0.000029906545,0.0013373428,0.0000050295,0.000009354071,0.000029841729,0.0000011041731,0.008000053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831617,0.0001838106,0.000025321087,0.0001327059,0.000004787353,0.0000060894527,0.00001540866,0.0000016456418,0.0013140913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969278,0.0008557361,0.000110121066,0.00013676325,0.0006362427,0.0013332989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957545,0.0010668543,0.0010941818,0.00013136111,0.00083891273,0.0011141985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015611025,0.00012263084,0.00030651357,0.001744066,0.012326942,0.004396814,0.00088760955,0.00071391783,0.0022464104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066370624,0.0002832337,0.00012962453,0.0036396163,0.0051280647,0.0010886706,0.0040639667,0.000937253,0.00014166575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004811727,0.00004650819,0.19158976,0.00006769258,0.000023461716,0.0018034335,0.7811189,0.00011506299,0.00033449574,0.00841345,0.0028175428,0.013621492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003220949,0.000024116905,0.17657647,0.000059159975,0.000012586207,0.00013322348,0.8064679,0.00008312849,0.00004947689,0.0005645755,0.016012887,0.000013255818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87705946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9587121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12294054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019627366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016153358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24732906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773902196","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Business; Workplace safety; Actuarial science; Occupational safety and health; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020903846980782893,"score_gpt":0.2672110351912151,"score_spread":0.24630718821043218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773902196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030397,0.0017884861,0.0002340363,0.027502127,0.0019444054,0.00049323175,0.036605407,0.0009366596,0.92745596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005571913,0.0005526169,0.00015564222,0.002586404,0.0001234062,0.00007033888,0.0027775734,0.00012565992,0.9880363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745315,0.00006914704,0.000083726525,0.00013389289,0.001454306,0.00080571626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99377936,0.00051898224,0.00017215038,0.00022192944,0.0037663402,0.0015413054],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001161364,0.0005783808,0.0007093989,0.003986927,0.012551638,0.005809766,0.001860767,0.0049390374,0.53065145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045303046,0.0012328193,0.0009016074,0.0043743113,0.0014315596,0.0013806302,0.0021085166,0.0022963185,0.14745757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023048886,0.000026056732,0.00082176167,0.00005472453,0.0000028197737,0.00005141232,0.000106251515,0.000022364962,0.00004269232,0.0014404311,0.98190534,0.015503042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030906776,0.000008567454,0.009871426,0.000068353824,0.000008683852,0.000021637441,0.00040278217,0.00012976957,0.00007255342,0.00039125606,0.9889774,0.00001681087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97822034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99283314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046131026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13092108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66946876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774724821","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Bill 175 on Policing: Improved Accountability but Lagging Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Community policing; Criminal justice; Lagging; Public administration; Unit (ring theory); Law; Police science; Criminology; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.030783874355245724,"score_gpt":0.3297382951063991,"score_spread":0.2989544207511534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774724821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033892322,0.002992313,0.0029408347,0.5789222,0.0038756025,0.00048464883,0.0011056068,0.00032948636,0.37545708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32188278,0.0038338176,0.007925558,0.23030947,0.0023181152,0.00046421195,0.0008167236,0.00021888781,0.43223044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97245705,0.0023023784,0.0008328044,0.0009611893,0.017049197,0.0063973987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702523,0.0056573963,0.0024384612,0.0020001214,0.012647253,0.0070045516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008413025,0.0003937285,0.0004140808,0.0016236029,0.01504766,0.011695099,0.0023529688,0.010132148,0.007749998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029766759,0.0008987825,0.00066631107,0.0025876372,0.008728742,0.003053762,0.003627825,0.0051267487,0.0010812604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000920861,0.00006337628,0.012958007,0.0003097304,0.000030033545,0.00074631977,0.005830843,0.0008861164,0.00092754676,0.24338907,0.6980773,0.036689457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061237995,0.000045394696,0.032556195,0.0002134766,0.000030010959,0.00008284466,0.0018096509,0.00031410914,0.00024094083,0.0076509994,0.9568933,0.00010189621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9701666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109802164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109802164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30523422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7966742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775070820","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Public Law : Readings on the Law, State, and Citizen","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Constitutional law; State (computer science); Municipal law; Charter; Common law; Private law; Constitution; Administrative law","score_opus":0.05899538876255789,"score_gpt":0.3075914701599615,"score_spread":0.24859608139740363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775070820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007831711,0.074913226,0.0020563866,0.055140138,0.007908847,0.00007305153,0.0008947776,0.00024300354,0.8579874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02617714,0.07029938,0.0025369148,0.020346586,0.0060168374,0.00010180974,0.001181972,0.00036306315,0.8729762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891675,0.00013527642,0.000025630847,0.0000925803,0.00064667285,0.00018304329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889,0.00031762637,0.000037353988,0.000050176008,0.00054315483,0.00016174292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070971233,0.00080649,0.0006767297,0.00320821,0.0071384823,0.0067970296,0.0014525115,0.002707568,0.0638519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019854542,0.00040073236,0.00040216438,0.0055515254,0.0069064973,0.0045299004,0.0021690703,0.0046915472,0.014239752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003667481,0.000011782412,0.00006393954,0.00009775413,0.0000014768812,0.00004573786,0.0024845686,0.000060577273,0.00009279648,0.09933665,0.869378,0.028423036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.3680324e-7,0.0000018840273,0.00018873706,0.00014544149,8.7763596e-7,0.000031825544,0.0007495413,0.00000992478,0.000012076688,0.010620937,0.9882343,0.0000039652678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41288915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5823721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41288915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021103678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025325043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8209717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776141614","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746420","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Bradshaw</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Reliability (semiconductor); Test (biology); Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.268432360058455,"score_gpt":0.458226880767542,"score_spread":0.18979452070908698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776141614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013244171,0.0034979957,0.0072292974,0.6191052,0.010798873,0.00027033922,0.0015665249,0.0008323723,0.3434553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10689364,0.0011088524,0.0071370797,0.77878106,0.0024622232,0.00014871906,0.00030323822,0.00024811193,0.10291705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843424,0.0012710909,0.0009210941,0.0019945044,0.0071491646,0.004321804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854935,0.0061441096,0.000600898,0.00079788006,0.0058019008,0.0011617603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010515241,0.0006722676,0.0012475455,0.0014402693,0.016165996,0.012889221,0.0064535425,0.033630546,0.009319738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030045563,0.0014310866,0.002544817,0.0018416861,0.011246422,0.002997206,0.0030465543,0.028846022,0.00411915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045568206,0.000026888296,0.0009856311,0.00007689559,0.000029985851,0.00047278093,0.0018302386,0.00021585797,0.0007375397,0.36746517,0.62205184,0.00606155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069436996,0.000055212582,0.0045168637,0.0004847752,0.000114200484,0.000382467,0.002442258,0.001098678,0.003381639,0.05471176,0.9324028,0.00033994118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8597223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9283252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8597223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03222956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059068676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28220755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777005456","doi":"10.5623/cig2017-303","title":"Geomatics And The Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Geomatics; Law; Political science; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.03791496737115112,"score_gpt":0.3539571924344309,"score_spread":0.3160422250632798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777005456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10195571,0.089647986,0.036975972,0.24061365,0.0013801748,0.00003913427,0.0010491783,0.00028311234,0.52805513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690906,0.010201639,0.003716971,0.0027322827,0.0010488117,0.000023083026,0.00013659328,0.000035238754,0.013014825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902177,0.00061905873,0.000041400017,0.00010834983,0.00013240566,0.00007694057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581933,0.0028342153,0.00045363035,0.00041217692,0.00030326037,0.00017734915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012298803,0.00027228697,0.000396189,0.002933084,0.002103588,0.006217119,0.00047982318,0.002700696,0.01194829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004667769,0.00021157648,0.0002747956,0.0027709156,0.018990789,0.0041309404,0.0016942177,0.002596269,0.0007661624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034350028,0.000004241031,0.0004998541,0.000016220767,0.0000030548983,0.000026410084,0.00024061186,0.00018673026,0.000026095177,0.9932448,0.0018818603,0.003866675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041211006,0.0000045258375,0.0012325877,0.000043943233,0.000003059156,0.0000642984,0.000507936,0.00033198905,0.000039706592,0.96955866,0.02820383,0.0000053423296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011853707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009931518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01194829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030620887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025464965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039970994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778785691","doi":"10.29173/alr1422","title":"Evidence Not in a Form Familiar to Common Law Courts: Assessing Oral Histories in Land Claims Testimony after Delgamuukw v. B.C.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Key (lock); Oral history; Political science; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09665511402190467,"score_gpt":0.3903933249545366,"score_spread":0.2937382109326319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778785691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2640512,0.06296343,0.014336859,0.18324867,0.0020902164,0.00046967276,0.0010117516,0.00008682295,0.47174138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096532,0.018790586,0.011824859,0.023487926,0.00030473236,0.00013619899,0.00023993882,0.000022222257,0.03554035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292153,0.0020411357,0.00043854784,0.00022101162,0.0036395853,0.00073812244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789954,0.015346211,0.0010296804,0.00046247744,0.0036549738,0.0005112686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009810354,0.00030867042,0.0003914351,0.0042227358,0.008899066,0.008060463,0.0019993866,0.006611981,0.0022304081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056515656,0.00047593712,0.00027672827,0.004177288,0.008364511,0.0039093867,0.0029138,0.0045426562,0.00033547566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015268332,0.00016179426,0.03273743,0.0011515851,0.000083020954,0.006321584,0.085949816,0.000559421,0.0026761717,0.5071936,0.09278039,0.2702325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006948001,0.00042979507,0.10984659,0.0071097165,0.00046195713,0.0029720399,0.124945335,0.0015889101,0.0085409,0.17741494,0.5662677,0.00035258356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4106202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82601666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5893798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010875247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022354275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81646025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779213843","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030651366788262895,"score_gpt":0.29370229857612146,"score_spread":0.26305093178785854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779213843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006121513,0.027188387,0.0007869577,0.02262348,0.0047230525,0.00012759418,0.0068745236,0.0003597876,0.93670416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008330247,0.027857354,0.0016971724,0.0054437364,0.0008577564,0.00008229707,0.0029479263,0.00020955595,0.95257396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980538,0.000103277715,0.000059353515,0.00015727918,0.001241344,0.0003849897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972464,0.00019680372,0.00003662836,0.000093370254,0.0020744158,0.00035236892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093513326,0.00155743,0.0008864732,0.0108269425,0.011637918,0.008131586,0.002194215,0.0024341214,0.2426918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042172535,0.00079796463,0.0009922434,0.013355456,0.002813521,0.0028972297,0.0017245584,0.003193348,0.039344747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028904758,0.0000070863107,0.00011110393,0.000067452165,0.0000013356625,0.00002121036,0.00014476926,0.000061244995,0.000015168686,0.024846071,0.95078933,0.023932427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5103856e-7,9.181159e-7,0.000425298,0.000062614905,0.0000015331856,0.000017406943,0.00012677554,0.000020062802,0.000008571467,0.0017689709,0.99756134,0.0000058329206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2426918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0802879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13835491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81188494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781044514","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01876450353820249,"score_gpt":0.2518688070905756,"score_spread":0.23310430355237308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781044514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016272406,0.0233408,0.0012818245,0.09809936,0.007012144,0.00015806669,0.0049270345,0.0002108763,0.8633426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059255186,0.025120638,0.0050346223,0.021562684,0.0019104013,0.00023753446,0.0019238255,0.00030451664,0.8846506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904254,0.000552023,0.00025849295,0.0005773726,0.006516447,0.0016703308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911116,0.00067903695,0.0001807998,0.0004583084,0.006500816,0.0010694809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035478217,0.0011116221,0.0009065778,0.0071534794,0.016048782,0.0148500325,0.0028886222,0.0052609444,0.033101097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011821245,0.0011055161,0.0008010185,0.010729994,0.010303665,0.0044775996,0.0023344795,0.00910173,0.004033953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047150425,0.0000053663434,0.00014247616,0.000042662818,0.0000025172565,0.000018732415,0.0004133597,0.000069146634,0.00001955399,0.33334008,0.6521654,0.013775952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002771789,0.0000014581194,0.0008191022,0.00009898804,0.0000032567032,0.000010994047,0.00031573873,0.00004355634,0.000021815307,0.009272673,0.98938996,0.000019724997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99420315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99572146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13122544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13122544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36731467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95211166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782384083","doi":"","title":"Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.03377678052959541,"score_gpt":0.2963913922807696,"score_spread":0.2626146117511742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782384083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00798948,0.0052040257,0.0012163771,0.026582027,0.0056120832,0.0014550439,0.18115415,0.0014192803,0.7693675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021191547,0.0038438623,0.0017011516,0.009055447,0.00035973065,0.000555543,0.03011621,0.00035645938,0.93282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913583,0.00030921985,0.00045312537,0.00061419513,0.004962909,0.0023023118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97026,0.0011132032,0.000655944,0.00069216045,0.02545513,0.0018236112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020369978,0.0012631501,0.0014077573,0.011308171,0.0129075255,0.008657812,0.0035081813,0.005274127,0.086843334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01653448,0.0013953454,0.0012280219,0.010686134,0.0014746751,0.0016345356,0.0015586873,0.005045036,0.026516365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001955021,0.000025292326,0.0014050027,0.00010320326,0.000009496389,0.000056291265,0.00015384032,0.00012699461,0.00006067869,0.01885266,0.96750915,0.011677824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018397348,0.000012497301,0.010601706,0.00025653178,0.000022975884,0.000044581604,0.00034426316,0.00029001076,0.00015087445,0.0013625198,0.9868401,0.00005556011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99158573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99309057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086843334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08045926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32374594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5837755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784283951","doi":"10.7202/1042777ar","title":"Le « dialogue » des parties et la vérité plurielle comme nouveau paradigme de la procédure civile québécoise","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Power (physics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06243198502734576,"score_gpt":0.342602126200495,"score_spread":0.28017014117314926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784283951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027298762,0.009919417,0.024231866,0.18282676,0.0010966958,0.00014165849,0.000177977,0.00007265222,0.7542342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81974626,0.0026683784,0.007093046,0.01971854,0.00030259404,0.00023448397,0.000090455265,0.000080349295,0.15006588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860162,0.0062117367,0.00021335289,0.0015470615,0.0035184622,0.0024931792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476886,0.0019194583,0.00034173022,0.00060929934,0.001483947,0.00087668264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009227004,0.00055841927,0.00051935756,0.0014583735,0.02060704,0.015010031,0.0022242693,0.010523618,0.009888269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008779864,0.0004207312,0.00065793324,0.0015343487,0.05220056,0.009474129,0.0063087335,0.011316656,0.0009532956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005751548,0.0000039019933,0.000107859785,0.000012839798,0.0000024414371,0.000048898877,0.004391596,0.00004774091,0.00006923814,0.9882427,0.0041072587,0.002959743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002570432,0.000024652578,0.0023101866,0.00033853666,0.000015711761,0.00016380122,0.012422209,0.00045293177,0.00030118861,0.40918395,0.57469714,0.00006400004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6836777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74338686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31632233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044460595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786609162","doi":"10.29173/alr1360","title":"Defence Disclosure: Is the Right to Full Answer the Right to Ambush","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Silence; Law; Set (abstract data type); Statement (logic); Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Position (finance); Common law; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03570520392435393,"score_gpt":0.313282738327093,"score_spread":0.2775775344027391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786609162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047898665,0.030633114,0.010358466,0.23374942,0.001339733,0.0001267855,0.00043958344,0.00010586831,0.6753484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8379699,0.009629358,0.003090587,0.037531685,0.0003578073,0.00005149654,0.0001658193,0.0000281758,0.111175224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879419,0.0028865724,0.0005789666,0.00084989547,0.0053935624,0.0023490484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897007,0.004419965,0.0013216321,0.00090513367,0.002909964,0.0007426032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00686808,0.00026979562,0.0004899711,0.00057829893,0.0040063867,0.00789303,0.0014818312,0.006740177,0.005426619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026442885,0.00025006846,0.0002771528,0.0009131516,0.0109533565,0.003795593,0.0025731665,0.004066231,0.00097023754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043681637,0.000020610105,0.0027078986,0.00024803093,0.00001655879,0.00020077884,0.004102808,0.000276821,0.00045158438,0.8940133,0.0339551,0.06396284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045814122,0.00010584096,0.0152047165,0.0010949839,0.00007263728,0.00089079904,0.0049200603,0.00067426293,0.001439262,0.24607243,0.72936064,0.00011855138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43949243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46399426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43949243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011407971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04795373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8738686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787300424","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.6643","title":"Hommage à Denis Szabo et aux professeurs de l’École de criminologie de l’Université de Montréal","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.053715143453711395,"score_gpt":0.26777546757250137,"score_spread":0.21406032411878997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787300424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004641791,0.17322637,0.0020873004,0.24558836,0.007725528,0.00008123732,0.00068410055,0.00015972317,0.56580555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04357969,0.048653718,0.0012963656,0.027459215,0.0016076803,0.00005848859,0.00020900673,0.00011213771,0.8770237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.00030440977,0.000031465905,0.00026282037,0.0006268527,0.00030700452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850285,0.00046811844,0.00009715596,0.00007557506,0.00054951175,0.0003068345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012425506,0.00078068615,0.00036565712,0.0015022212,0.0067763915,0.0061832927,0.0013406338,0.0035654302,0.024683198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003370743,0.000550418,0.00031336898,0.002469432,0.007312934,0.003068264,0.0019131354,0.0041629733,0.004662256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018009014,0.0000127579115,0.00081727095,0.0001238219,0.000008562896,0.00010738522,0.0054531824,0.00007430918,0.00024783032,0.19593424,0.75887203,0.038330622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026124992,0.0000028992838,0.0012629692,0.00010350846,0.000004002855,0.000060500275,0.0007134674,0.000025625492,0.00009476864,0.0032824194,0.994437,0.000010314933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68789005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85758585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97606045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023939544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02764845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6278961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787804057","doi":"","title":"Toronto Innocence Project Tackles 1983 Brantford Murder Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06137030841555057,"score_gpt":0.38934823812425534,"score_spread":0.32797792970870476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787804057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25147825,0.0048421733,0.0011455163,0.15443741,0.002450933,0.0005812628,0.0013639696,0.00015615871,0.5835443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5144617,0.002420047,0.00087945705,0.032003902,0.00053597265,0.00013062754,0.00044043173,0.00006848921,0.44905934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973568,0.00039847038,0.00008068063,0.00021418065,0.00076062494,0.0011892623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965244,0.001079756,0.0001535485,0.00017186272,0.0007565116,0.001313908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024506266,0.00039297217,0.00044435752,0.0019133532,0.019149845,0.0037732008,0.0023603388,0.009432973,0.015714504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009830812,0.0005407229,0.0004202442,0.0009585475,0.0034438544,0.0011400643,0.004175975,0.007336535,0.0016406017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024126444,0.00016435508,0.021086553,0.0001908264,0.0000770067,0.0145328725,0.02015688,0.001385857,0.0014243124,0.08524042,0.7936893,0.061810207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012683545,0.00029191482,0.10151287,0.00050763367,0.0001406268,0.0024415078,0.045113485,0.0009464645,0.0026110478,0.008735874,0.8374164,0.0001552021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8108133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9730477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18918669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029287983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035333283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38060164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787935789","doi":"10.29173/alr1283","title":"Legislative Reform and Equal Access to the Justice System: An Examination of Alberta's New Minor Injury Cap in the Context of Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Law; Economic Justice; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Minor (academic); Political science; Constitution; Nova scotia; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04360210762322076,"score_gpt":0.3326266104978964,"score_spread":0.2890245028746756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787935789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2321838,0.03497006,0.0023423915,0.1553838,0.0013656574,0.0004149623,0.00024941796,0.000106907304,0.5729829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90557,0.010622814,0.002104474,0.035327855,0.00043715784,0.000100646655,0.00013209417,0.000021795195,0.045683198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862862,0.0018196916,0.00024268105,0.00049502024,0.0068361247,0.0043202774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909071,0.0038472947,0.00064889673,0.00028849868,0.0034463517,0.0008619705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067593805,0.00031367474,0.0004992123,0.0040815813,0.017083803,0.010430621,0.0030710103,0.0046813115,0.0025918828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013725889,0.0005252383,0.0005758168,0.004306152,0.01610675,0.0018303207,0.003487202,0.0044395593,0.00014888078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000739879,0.00016489919,0.0154643655,0.0003390136,0.000044952605,0.0012980708,0.029834012,0.0027891048,0.0011272855,0.848686,0.040391866,0.059786543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119827484,0.00023426874,0.18614784,0.0011046034,0.00025384274,0.00042244408,0.043718986,0.0025925734,0.0016294082,0.049998987,0.7135044,0.0002728628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98267144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13664515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13664515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19533852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788177574","doi":"10.29173/alr1314","title":"Brief Investigatory Detentions: A Critique of R. v. Simpson","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Discretion; Enumerated powers; Doctrine; Political science; High Court; Parliament; Jurisprudence; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Democracy; Constitution; Charter; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04229899534236255,"score_gpt":0.3577575826494064,"score_spread":0.31545858730704385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788177574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016581899,0.046810467,0.012203876,0.7572012,0.004752525,0.000113773785,0.00016080351,0.00013633532,0.16203925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41454688,0.0243967,0.0059323865,0.5113565,0.0072957394,0.00021837428,0.000064258275,0.00012763486,0.0360615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97458047,0.005443753,0.0017706702,0.003493731,0.012971331,0.0017401157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524702,0.038265437,0.0019876915,0.0009953757,0.0048629134,0.001418388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025193954,0.00047499323,0.000944412,0.0023808314,0.008405025,0.007448235,0.004280659,0.020750588,0.001176942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046793118,0.0007452612,0.0011708227,0.0017905179,0.026784379,0.004266956,0.0034744628,0.023381516,0.00043299064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029805911,0.000013748578,0.0008612409,0.00021857054,0.000029612116,0.00070177123,0.007992893,0.00040926383,0.00024089258,0.8887836,0.07922075,0.021497784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007412414,0.000071678856,0.002207943,0.0011550313,0.00007553833,0.00072341075,0.004351923,0.00057127886,0.00045518487,0.24563365,0.7445665,0.000113761926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30031613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33206964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30031613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02397922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03911784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59713614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788185674","doi":"10.7202/1043361ar","title":"Le renvoi : un instrument de défense important dans les poursuites Américaines contre les Canadiens","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06133054588687164,"score_gpt":0.3228278215796482,"score_spread":0.26149727569277653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788185674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040625136,0.10471384,0.047923148,0.35875413,0.010675673,0.0006583433,0.0032913932,0.0005693969,0.43278894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72079766,0.037916157,0.0641645,0.053709436,0.004442692,0.0016099664,0.0019576647,0.000481176,0.1149207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95186365,0.022571169,0.0031379086,0.0024639159,0.016927198,0.0030361603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9126853,0.047994416,0.009387728,0.007468517,0.019559624,0.00290441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054908033,0.0009785799,0.0013419234,0.0064695342,0.004902334,0.01244255,0.003142192,0.007622328,0.0072054854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1362973,0.0007045731,0.0010836631,0.0041672355,0.0116288,0.012787063,0.008622593,0.012261223,0.001448567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021598912,0.000066752116,0.015311786,0.00066618726,0.00011783375,0.00023959331,0.006814396,0.0006315487,0.0004750195,0.69655526,0.095936224,0.18296942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083934414,0.00024272848,0.035625253,0.0058023157,0.00019601041,0.0008459486,0.0069932914,0.0014430818,0.0020857353,0.17267333,0.77366436,0.00034408152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033912167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034308154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009988411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022066196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29038495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788220173","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.38","title":"Plea Bargaining under the Common Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Constitutionality; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Economics; Supreme court; Geography","score_opus":0.10959591741947135,"score_gpt":0.3686482351885158,"score_spread":0.25905231776904447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788220173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04123466,0.005500419,0.10994092,0.014039638,0.0005755285,0.0002871903,0.00016747444,0.00011761776,0.8281366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703762,0.0041634487,0.029434098,0.004753805,0.00064379704,0.0004012246,0.00021823794,0.00008916735,0.08991995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763826,0.010800042,0.0013232299,0.0025174124,0.0066093765,0.0023672371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541576,0.010364248,0.001073967,0.0012050644,0.0015338035,0.0004071864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017796885,0.00040788695,0.0007410722,0.0028147227,0.007497597,0.0111147985,0.0017671342,0.0040489887,0.013389499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03413799,0.0005891925,0.00076770346,0.003317751,0.016920377,0.009173493,0.006146475,0.0048796483,0.0021606332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009676426,0.000012474429,0.00022541263,0.000016106434,0.0000024434846,0.000065221604,0.0010052132,0.00040581438,0.00007402794,0.9866775,0.0018004992,0.009705451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024931876,0.00007747722,0.0017710559,0.00040523353,0.000020562476,0.00027933792,0.0029505724,0.0029179805,0.00070412416,0.77617013,0.21461707,0.00006147569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018558994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022844892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018558994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010011178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009190775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094120085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788667413","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court confirms plaintiffs' ability to obtain disclosure of wiretap evidence obtained in connection with criminal competition law investigations (Imperial Oil)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Competition (biology)","score_opus":0.026632222436148094,"score_gpt":0.27651343996927363,"score_spread":0.24988121753312553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788667413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16393818,0.0027141292,0.0029842043,0.09920551,0.0013726291,0.0007822463,0.0076707867,0.00037587396,0.72095644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65664333,0.0027292718,0.005955967,0.05473692,0.0003243683,0.00023570271,0.0022367267,0.00011908837,0.27701858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786607,0.0005820375,0.0005887653,0.0012591699,0.014752298,0.004156928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724224,0.00815931,0.0008486436,0.0013821975,0.015283045,0.001904347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076061357,0.00040777345,0.00057877426,0.003937806,0.01882237,0.0059334002,0.00391111,0.008145478,0.010208293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041370835,0.00095335685,0.0006783598,0.0035402537,0.006366001,0.0014449181,0.002968196,0.0077082487,0.0018890972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028078977,0.00014532005,0.026933922,0.00044024122,0.000110500856,0.0043678796,0.014988092,0.00037876028,0.007067976,0.18406612,0.70211715,0.059103314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016038155,0.00011180143,0.09118346,0.00057197944,0.00033043764,0.0011870795,0.007082466,0.0010387107,0.015735535,0.009758185,0.87250113,0.00033880933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04059977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04059977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11937887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2945733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788828802","doi":"","title":"The Canadian law dictionary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02264744216608287,"score_gpt":0.259527525284474,"score_spread":0.23688008311839112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788828802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029195467,0.013454046,0.0006338224,0.0074154404,0.002831838,0.00017369451,0.024462702,0.00069194986,0.9500445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026910212,0.014483368,0.0011286365,0.0024758277,0.00034793263,0.00012784365,0.009535355,0.00040157133,0.9688084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955226,0.0001840865,0.00020030673,0.00031811238,0.0032051567,0.0005697116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217826,0.00038596158,0.00016696278,0.0004294083,0.0063327434,0.00050659484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014015824,0.0017418284,0.0013803822,0.017615782,0.011465991,0.013229394,0.0037319704,0.0026145992,0.30909616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008864717,0.0010294307,0.00077471003,0.03312568,0.0031737883,0.004512442,0.0022656294,0.0035422307,0.16830233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029237415,0.000005366139,0.0000727287,0.00008374951,0.0000011643456,0.000014615487,0.00009579501,0.000027784325,0.000017562703,0.012147789,0.9578699,0.029660506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.950334e-7,5.3612e-7,0.00015984294,0.00007281503,0.0000010297367,0.0000072340044,0.000061019833,0.000009343578,0.000009664827,0.0006444478,0.9990295,0.0000039918855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30909616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17533521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788954873","doi":"10.11575/prism/34314","title":"Spinning Wheels in the Castle: A lost Decade for Sustainability in Southwestern Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Geography; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.09380505524430019,"score_gpt":0.41358909701403324,"score_spread":0.3197840417697331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788954873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8826688,0.016361862,0.00082758156,0.031631593,0.00022478789,0.000029821973,0.00019294338,0.000022292003,0.06804028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775792,0.0076852813,0.00045783567,0.0025633913,0.000037043123,0.0000052984024,0.00010744184,0.000006314466,0.011558085],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986545,0.00021701482,0.000031449596,0.000080821526,0.00063342415,0.00038274264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973937,0.00089217286,0.00034896034,0.00008434663,0.0009385658,0.00034217202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019606592,0.00016336545,0.0002344955,0.0016135405,0.009282719,0.004497562,0.0012450347,0.0014099434,0.0023164195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034130728,0.00015596421,0.00012275123,0.00206204,0.0070931935,0.0012062743,0.001563779,0.0021044721,0.00010371151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059640664,0.00019177685,0.16486456,0.0008803175,0.00011729845,0.005872744,0.16126178,0.003459778,0.0023988758,0.20987758,0.05561969,0.3948592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029485866,0.00014833639,0.2873788,0.001531473,0.00010734973,0.00058536755,0.4077717,0.0008977764,0.0019318818,0.01942471,0.2800549,0.00013815169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95703596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98997843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04296404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03506407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042251818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25440884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789024057","doi":"10.29173/alr1288","title":"Rules of Court Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Law; Project charter; Business; Project management; Political science; Project management triangle; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.056870058364180354,"score_gpt":0.382275348462692,"score_spread":0.32540529009851166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789024057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019146886,0.004749494,0.023951529,0.05742767,0.00790844,0.0072994153,0.0052670166,0.0014874846,0.8727622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1368623,0.0037273327,0.0656411,0.033326387,0.0013741276,0.0043038903,0.0059713097,0.00079786166,0.7479958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9314548,0.010913356,0.002035624,0.004757148,0.04492057,0.00591851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9139943,0.014186736,0.0016008575,0.0064526345,0.051247366,0.012517983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04843733,0.000721248,0.0012394926,0.0068905912,0.020734292,0.024417045,0.0072126454,0.0065382584,0.024566527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04853635,0.0015054389,0.0009458975,0.004230665,0.00538043,0.0038664585,0.0058776936,0.0072868625,0.0060677277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012295712,0.0002596498,0.0023954154,0.00024174673,0.00004689577,0.0005180298,0.0031563458,0.002031381,0.00086322695,0.36570984,0.51580095,0.10885363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007358749,0.00008105478,0.0036914707,0.00022048465,0.000040601608,0.000104500185,0.0021062049,0.0010069078,0.0005716382,0.015574032,0.97644114,0.00008847096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6417063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78626263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3582937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046779487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25836092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72080755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789237171","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242017038002003","title":"Het besluitvormingsproces van civiele rechters in procedures over de gevolgen van een (echt)scheiding met een beschuldiging van seksueel kindermisbruik","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Context (archaeology); False accusation; Child sexual abuse; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Child abuse; Social psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.053365089582501274,"score_gpt":0.37743775456552375,"score_spread":0.32407266498302245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789237171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49662405,0.014328,0.04286277,0.09213933,0.0010659181,0.0005072779,0.00015554564,0.00011210993,0.35220492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96685714,0.0026439673,0.005038531,0.0016585455,0.000103063605,0.00012432723,0.000052904863,0.00007347033,0.023448108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94451267,0.04155891,0.001843739,0.0020923845,0.0065086423,0.003483676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520188,0.034128174,0.0036652277,0.0020493336,0.0042244364,0.003914028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033143986,0.00029405384,0.00046644305,0.0015821334,0.008492877,0.015360472,0.0017636418,0.0034134893,0.013334731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06971958,0.00068356714,0.00032033157,0.0012579431,0.014021309,0.008246644,0.009829396,0.0050596814,0.0013643034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001717443,0.00046099655,0.019048672,0.00058424193,0.00006885546,0.0024680416,0.27558354,0.0017767849,0.0019511,0.37071452,0.027041966,0.3001296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049369046,0.00017439331,0.022952111,0.0027649058,0.00004827727,0.00079127616,0.275306,0.0011861601,0.0023741804,0.10632012,0.5878957,0.0001375163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018268123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036545023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033143986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008460563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014805015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1752842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789292187","doi":"","title":"Ramsay's appeals cases: with notes and definitions of the civil and criminal law of the province of Quebec, including a large number [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.0503758408984799,"score_gpt":0.290817566300573,"score_spread":0.24044172540209308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789292187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013824995,0.12616172,0.0014999263,0.18359968,0.005869011,0.00024657152,0.0075112777,0.0003503661,0.6609364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21484946,0.043121714,0.0033138872,0.069836184,0.0016181377,0.00017119038,0.0032324304,0.00016559017,0.6636915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984837,0.0001320235,0.000047469613,0.000105905754,0.0008164597,0.00041441698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998251,0.00031017247,0.00008408969,0.00006368608,0.0010680655,0.00022289403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218874,0.00069445634,0.00027718584,0.0033477687,0.009858705,0.0047016824,0.0021211405,0.003312944,0.014459943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00427403,0.0003550119,0.00044740926,0.004569325,0.0053214575,0.002185516,0.0011742068,0.0035334895,0.0018263323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009094166,0.000012688695,0.0012752658,0.00011063758,0.000005521727,0.00024038473,0.003280854,0.00012608341,0.00010736132,0.05147486,0.921124,0.022233253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064716155,0.000006634684,0.018792106,0.00030928236,0.000010491304,0.0002091945,0.005215347,0.00015156074,0.00011208197,0.0041888608,0.97094953,0.000048438025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99782985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06132811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06132811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07666672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4449687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789323451","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code of Canada ; and, the Canada Evidence Act: with their amendments, including the amending acts of 1900 and 1901, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Criminology; Criminal law; Programming language; Sociology; Computer science; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04512774575006161,"score_gpt":0.27831594266083187,"score_spread":0.23318819691077025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789323451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002337918,0.03474823,0.00280391,0.113005035,0.006557056,0.0003305356,0.035957657,0.0008465165,0.8034131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044781867,0.023415819,0.0069209007,0.046747025,0.001008772,0.0003603151,0.01008379,0.0005136765,0.8661678],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945181,0.00021286726,0.00013532577,0.00020080677,0.004095202,0.00083776884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899682,0.00059271435,0.00027588132,0.00017917543,0.008266765,0.0007172953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015033624,0.00093495764,0.00059848884,0.0034620217,0.010837549,0.0052432967,0.002085325,0.004027299,0.031917688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011499414,0.0005612163,0.00056646037,0.0056340145,0.0030346191,0.0022100494,0.0012176451,0.004916262,0.0096061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007637828,0.0000053634594,0.00026494416,0.000049405342,0.0000028261127,0.000015707898,0.00017669902,0.000049628332,0.000039596784,0.023603681,0.9667086,0.0090759825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037905054,0.0000028067232,0.0021051911,0.000114394235,0.000006718726,0.000018998639,0.00028868095,0.000060973893,0.000053543856,0.0018239259,0.9954957,0.000025176909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08179724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08179724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27464724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5934833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789383471","doi":"","title":"Crankshaw's Criminal code of Canada; a commentary on the Criminal law of Canada including an appendix containing all relevant [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0670297515716922,"score_gpt":0.3083096560830036,"score_spread":0.24127990451131137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789383471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027192235,0.0969486,0.0012701125,0.43943867,0.026150402,0.00026409162,0.010084002,0.00024689833,0.42287806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048307646,0.036749594,0.0022444974,0.21135311,0.0034879718,0.000339874,0.002603953,0.00036817353,0.6945452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611086,0.00033452906,0.00012993417,0.00020562523,0.0024368945,0.0007821556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99365073,0.0013399061,0.00020696582,0.000090814545,0.004164972,0.0005465896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001633205,0.0010213061,0.00064721995,0.0030145654,0.020189682,0.005930015,0.0028127625,0.01000798,0.01972619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012154061,0.0007458826,0.00071452936,0.005129729,0.005050597,0.0022947327,0.0012969379,0.009282381,0.004038983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036217766,0.0000023488724,0.000062999796,0.00003137857,0.0000011794148,0.00002800354,0.00029008192,0.00002855292,0.000015522133,0.010605212,0.9869006,0.0020304946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006560622,0.0000032764574,0.002571444,0.00031064634,0.00000863444,0.000035797395,0.0011848614,0.00006509346,0.00010180151,0.0030115165,0.9926593,0.000041050094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07217914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07217914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1662768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52369875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789428332","doi":"","title":"Update '92: what's new in the law!: Edmonton, Alberta, May 28, 1993, Calgary, Alberta, May 31, 1993.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019255249835190173,"score_gpt":0.26289198773813294,"score_spread":0.24363673790294277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789428332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091549684,0.3443709,0.0012634875,0.09067308,0.024723265,0.00016580297,0.016318096,0.0015687816,0.5200011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002752502,0.058855936,0.0007577784,0.006990639,0.0012250708,0.00004777478,0.002868364,0.00021160007,0.9262904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988028,0.00006192841,0.000056368393,0.00008852766,0.0008100311,0.00018045094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818295,0.00018714803,0.00007840276,0.00006577657,0.0011761136,0.00030954994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013664945,0.0015514628,0.00073347776,0.0032374463,0.003281376,0.0056445547,0.0023376811,0.0052198954,0.15011995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026412962,0.0009202899,0.00055707403,0.0064477576,0.0017417033,0.003055101,0.0014102355,0.0046140817,0.076946326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055829323,0.0000038018015,0.00006271463,0.0000457448,8.431106e-7,0.000016891972,0.00003414173,0.000024704972,0.000017862538,0.0003481691,0.98391104,0.015528504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036106785,0.000002429529,0.0017305939,0.00024280793,0.000003797729,0.00002577166,0.00016016423,0.0000214147,0.000025209138,0.00022633397,0.99755067,0.0000072591506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8432076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9676271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1567924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018039314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02656934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50220126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789485244","doi":"","title":"Understanding Charter decisions: a guide to judicial reasoning and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.053047364268047695,"score_gpt":0.284264058982167,"score_spread":0.23121669471411932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789485244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00230827,0.064078175,0.0803802,0.11177818,0.0019234895,0.0006091485,0.004076564,0.00068996946,0.7341561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.122304805,0.09989085,0.22130981,0.03187111,0.0013507681,0.0008265286,0.003949397,0.001021125,0.51747566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693775,0.0007607442,0.00018738235,0.00025740737,0.0013932786,0.00046335184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953092,0.0019824926,0.00015598373,0.00014737289,0.00217058,0.00023429825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048642103,0.0015180643,0.0008949102,0.007019123,0.009242321,0.01698336,0.0045820866,0.0057344455,0.0284707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010570339,0.0011971256,0.00091370475,0.010016479,0.018154917,0.011346128,0.0020229907,0.005570118,0.00525845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060946986,0.000017551652,0.00019099393,0.00014547716,0.0000049042997,0.00010711816,0.00799973,0.00061928085,0.00009809282,0.6291601,0.31076536,0.05088527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004933366,0.000003440706,0.0008811421,0.00054123736,0.000007364398,0.000070264236,0.0048304987,0.0005537169,0.00012662927,0.18603316,0.8068938,0.00005369399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9165843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9649103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08341569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06575996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12871048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4771241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789578454","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada, relating to criminal law and to procedure in criminal cases: passed in [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Parliament; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030462463604504567,"score_gpt":0.2838917775752629,"score_spread":0.25342931397075835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789578454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016588803,0.055942457,0.0018244112,0.260901,0.013894581,0.00034658736,0.010474898,0.00045526557,0.639572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12190218,0.011091685,0.0024369264,0.075199254,0.0011304884,0.00015606698,0.0015975453,0.0002453834,0.78624046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936559,0.00047999743,0.0002182723,0.0003204438,0.0036724373,0.0016529908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499714,0.0010894232,0.0002178654,0.00014073947,0.0029297206,0.00062506186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028425164,0.0008208315,0.00064276694,0.0022049912,0.018075475,0.006262465,0.0021667236,0.00790921,0.012589215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014514291,0.0007856929,0.0007199191,0.003141662,0.004144151,0.0017848875,0.0016085184,0.0074492153,0.0026328983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023280132,0.000010383615,0.0007288851,0.00007703107,0.00001050854,0.00012639776,0.002277136,0.00008403974,0.00023968564,0.06281894,0.922836,0.0107676275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008789255,0.0000067651054,0.0075865877,0.00012494618,0.000017637072,0.000058593498,0.001692715,0.00009378246,0.00042987848,0.0022593653,0.98767465,0.000046184126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99389255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061407395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16368216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44554394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789589349","doi":"","title":"The transformation of Canadian law: 1937-1982","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02436261338366802,"score_gpt":0.25539014604866905,"score_spread":0.23102753266500103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789589349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010929071,0.06064097,0.00065512763,0.039629124,0.0022337413,0.00014784452,0.0039487123,0.00007222635,0.88174313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18204284,0.04254754,0.0013896582,0.007797912,0.0005771812,0.00012262212,0.0011068106,0.00011851394,0.7642969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967803,0.00021375656,0.000092274866,0.0002925188,0.0017149757,0.0009060466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996443,0.0004579796,0.00012457685,0.000104524544,0.0023887104,0.00048127392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017681926,0.00085336604,0.0004616261,0.0064507453,0.018827597,0.008619813,0.0014842949,0.003684557,0.03282978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009771092,0.0008101777,0.0004428177,0.013042115,0.010458792,0.0036595596,0.0021722452,0.004170395,0.0024788338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041719886,0.000038419832,0.0019940967,0.0002741227,0.000010754283,0.00022321902,0.0115553085,0.00037203616,0.00008854457,0.4532415,0.44309402,0.08906624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004416167,0.000003009586,0.0063562253,0.00021175791,0.000005569535,0.0000320998,0.0019923649,0.0000605092,0.000058477908,0.0049055405,0.9863544,0.000015607015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99602664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27460712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27460712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30176902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84135294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789653898","doi":"","title":"Gangsterism: Canada's law of criminal organizations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.022552951469887696,"score_gpt":0.2727643352926782,"score_spread":0.2502113838227905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789653898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062854597,0.039047137,0.0010894928,0.1771896,0.005699901,0.00021663113,0.004319301,0.00023530204,0.76591724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085243575,0.018138122,0.0016098407,0.05391902,0.0012018576,0.00015620491,0.0010823626,0.00014702727,0.838502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965287,0.00019015951,0.00007643199,0.00022418128,0.001847939,0.0011326574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997358,0.00035314096,0.000090955036,0.00008506238,0.0013887138,0.0007241481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013487353,0.00092093897,0.0005394447,0.0045074597,0.01744188,0.014308588,0.003123708,0.010279163,0.031948935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054238713,0.00084893533,0.0007467211,0.0054359823,0.0076236627,0.0031532822,0.0020927566,0.0072134617,0.0027781825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065822273,0.000014054238,0.0005830341,0.00006228705,0.0000042728766,0.000048913735,0.0012962852,0.00009465631,0.000025192372,0.18937087,0.7945786,0.013915264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007353491,0.0000039800143,0.0028344789,0.00018280771,0.000009571352,0.000026660698,0.0017517854,0.00007663464,0.00004473436,0.008923223,0.9861146,0.000024060037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124867685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124867685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3180747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90598273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789657666","doi":"10.29173/alr1366","title":"A Triumph of Liberalism: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Exclusion of Evidence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Seriousness; Charter; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09589099118009374,"score_gpt":0.31981860132533957,"score_spread":0.22392761014524581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789657666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03295193,0.054072227,0.0032047569,0.67576665,0.0015353233,0.00005228192,0.00012324798,0.000044266235,0.2322493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8446428,0.012950348,0.0022983002,0.11303555,0.0013713565,0.00005301586,0.00006354718,0.000047834994,0.025537258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97776014,0.0052570403,0.00064816495,0.0013687711,0.010970043,0.0039957827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9504994,0.032796465,0.0015701114,0.0014528456,0.010220799,0.0034603644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016662164,0.00031870915,0.00091183017,0.003552646,0.022674583,0.025128523,0.0029499664,0.013490805,0.0025264963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04511279,0.00057799474,0.0006168102,0.00435973,0.055868495,0.006228543,0.0055087176,0.016854519,0.00022768787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013159276,0.000008384455,0.0008300492,0.000050189803,0.000012687271,0.0001680397,0.002445587,0.00021583845,0.00005598981,0.96885496,0.017329434,0.010015532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007442756,0.0000255319,0.0060003726,0.0010379823,0.00008654292,0.00013825588,0.0056926655,0.000981968,0.00032497648,0.6854589,0.30003744,0.00014091968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91465366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9463221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11464997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11464997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18748847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8318476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789673800","doi":"","title":"A treatise on criminal law as applicable to the Dominion of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02684177489962293,"score_gpt":0.2896069637019608,"score_spread":0.2627651888023379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789673800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023864652,0.054430887,0.0011440375,0.07618001,0.0054970495,0.0001129188,0.0012309096,0.00009127575,0.8589264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.079833336,0.047773857,0.0022319278,0.05252133,0.0018906319,0.00019122293,0.00054367795,0.0001736316,0.8148404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957782,0.0002707554,0.000097162236,0.0002801355,0.002344763,0.0012289247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974354,0.0006172564,0.00006930466,0.00008085708,0.0014288472,0.00036827356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015399277,0.0009278043,0.0007712176,0.0038872377,0.021656984,0.012043409,0.0026351055,0.007970448,0.022704508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058770413,0.0007135985,0.0008923354,0.0060041477,0.0104126325,0.0026577446,0.0018438403,0.009872376,0.0020577554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930774,0.000009859244,0.00026399695,0.00008863137,0.000007971629,0.00010737865,0.002266021,0.00016103586,0.000068897076,0.48606002,0.49659654,0.014359738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056912395,0.000003245224,0.0012512994,0.00025572383,0.000011908986,0.000040340754,0.0010444915,0.000076192984,0.000053529682,0.016848337,0.9803829,0.000026227633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99236465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99685043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09753301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09753301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2574966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70765483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789925663","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment: Criminal code (1954) judicially considered","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05898467493305496,"score_gpt":0.3172819403649254,"score_spread":0.2582972654318704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789925663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068957116,0.06938334,0.001536411,0.10620767,0.008571954,0.0001849569,0.003224309,0.0001367822,0.8038589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17212331,0.018534094,0.0026370825,0.05896421,0.0024125802,0.00027377927,0.0008534008,0.00018377735,0.7440178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950029,0.000496239,0.00017224844,0.00051479804,0.0024711036,0.0013427408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657923,0.0007682056,0.00012426944,0.00016299121,0.0020271665,0.0003381907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023973137,0.0009886266,0.00057522324,0.005577074,0.02139508,0.009604793,0.00272735,0.014314528,0.014375917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013337643,0.0010315645,0.0006309773,0.008223538,0.014185156,0.0041972883,0.0023292922,0.009005322,0.0021669536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001220307,0.00000947773,0.00033204936,0.000057779856,0.0000034303678,0.00012775403,0.004279894,0.00009569521,0.00005239646,0.43494073,0.54308987,0.01699867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062511103,0.000003872736,0.0024613768,0.00025171286,0.000010618063,0.00005533845,0.0015843629,0.00007310599,0.00009713136,0.023956703,0.97146297,0.000036570204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98704344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109707355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109707355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17723209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7959863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790009439","doi":"","title":"A subject-index to the books in the library of the Law Society of Upper Canada at Osgoode Hall : Toronto, January, 1st, 1923","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Index (typography); Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.013692326278774938,"score_gpt":0.22756318904292905,"score_spread":0.21387086276415412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790009439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013250241,0.06148583,0.00057418644,0.006895786,0.00646149,0.00029487116,0.034509934,0.001181216,0.8872717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017486681,0.012667907,0.00035357228,0.0005493971,0.00039847012,0.000031774787,0.004015132,0.00021445192,0.98002064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996339,0.000012368615,0.000016929416,0.00003250502,0.00022091148,0.000083322666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901533,0.0000712719,0.000023513201,0.00003388698,0.0006491562,0.00020690837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019940356,0.0016943234,0.0015540799,0.007255259,0.0056828884,0.004520378,0.0013145624,0.00087681843,0.3796033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015299771,0.0005722588,0.00050449366,0.02105971,0.001249034,0.0019178706,0.0012841694,0.0012754465,0.1414405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008166511,0.0000070637993,0.00011855077,0.00010847099,0.0000018744123,0.00001833353,0.00008756496,0.000032612843,0.000068507245,0.0012241363,0.9798922,0.018432515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002436418,0.0000030975866,0.0014084445,0.00011278252,0.000003519877,0.000020851789,0.00014666513,0.000021551665,0.000035961893,0.00034078603,0.99789715,0.000006787912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.878661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9672753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019600147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030653194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8849206},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2790048109","doi":"","title":"100 years of the Criminal Code in Canada: essays commemorating the centenary of the criminal code in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); History; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03911979276269225,"score_gpt":0.26685640679931094,"score_spread":0.22773661403661868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790048109","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019388488,0.14450558,0.0006247324,0.64222497,0.01471188,0.000089985355,0.0006720194,0.000041844363,0.17774041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3919867,0.1067671,0.0010786873,0.2612138,0.006575183,0.0001819679,0.00034921596,0.00035822843,0.23148915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99241966,0.000806817,0.00020098823,0.0005353916,0.0029108045,0.0031262757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983417,0.0053029,0.0005156262,0.00023391288,0.0070674694,0.0034631097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005795799,0.0009575047,0.0010945585,0.004371847,0.06120576,0.02491211,0.0041388827,0.017621031,0.0074667786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023779359,0.0010365221,0.0008605935,0.009660504,0.028275542,0.008118824,0.0056132795,0.018529374,0.0005808162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034112185,0.000023586788,0.0011848735,0.00022788146,0.000026135895,0.00033244136,0.06310295,0.0002803174,0.00011648573,0.19696057,0.7219651,0.015745573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011719641,0.0000063216216,0.004694241,0.00070611015,0.000031931508,0.00007179261,0.048978433,0.00010737982,0.000094487295,0.008468975,0.93673277,0.00009578781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99884087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27156898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27156898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42322534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84487677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790117848","doi":"","title":"All about law: exploring the Canadian legal system, second edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04345530211492521,"score_gpt":0.2562554150268402,"score_spread":0.21280011291191497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790117848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020199013,0.39390168,0.0016470922,0.060067926,0.0041919257,0.00009905335,0.0070607727,0.0003203867,0.53069127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041440777,0.36529878,0.005290885,0.011492851,0.001568605,0.00014066846,0.0048018633,0.00038445488,0.5695811],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988481,0.000047552378,0.000031150594,0.00006700986,0.0008183014,0.00018783705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861825,0.00019832712,0.00004888907,0.000037129867,0.0009015969,0.00019572943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077496737,0.001070867,0.0005186173,0.006980524,0.007404955,0.008654236,0.0024011745,0.0024328367,0.06338663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003270176,0.00068526634,0.00048129217,0.01493665,0.0048564426,0.0056980215,0.0012880132,0.0021958672,0.0070754606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004595401,0.000008640801,0.00042968395,0.00030565955,0.0000039473416,0.00006076806,0.0017773061,0.00015390405,0.000074050746,0.041743662,0.89706165,0.058376208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012179962,0.0000014388546,0.0021004137,0.0002806974,0.0000040577734,0.000048531183,0.001573916,0.00004580175,0.000026572841,0.00471581,0.9911917,0.000009882895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9821769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99586475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070682526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070682526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14390048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51284003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790182070","doi":"","title":"The Canada statute and criminal code citator","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Statute; Political science; Law; Code (set theory); Statute of limitations; Criminal law; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.029613760604173183,"score_gpt":0.28437638592906817,"score_spread":0.25476262532489496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790182070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017854234,0.057091363,0.00081344164,0.2683398,0.026726127,0.00018475854,0.008637297,0.00033090494,0.6360908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02042161,0.019907307,0.0009741843,0.046603348,0.0025261887,0.00011682681,0.0014074001,0.00026608573,0.90777695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912059,0.00039790728,0.0002520187,0.00067134434,0.005891124,0.0015817465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863973,0.0015478792,0.00024029244,0.00030711602,0.010544644,0.00096265593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029557857,0.0010861994,0.0014213062,0.008776164,0.02191451,0.01585062,0.0029439128,0.009297302,0.043327343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017790204,0.0014125798,0.0010675564,0.011630659,0.007068877,0.0044464623,0.0019446977,0.010924269,0.009783335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034769303,0.0000028279053,0.00014502369,0.00002718394,0.00000215441,0.000019472169,0.00013527184,0.000035865458,0.00001112117,0.042395312,0.9514897,0.005732514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052213422,0.0000019044993,0.0009659894,0.00013873272,0.000008720128,0.00001757507,0.0004082846,0.00006147174,0.00003825158,0.0035169676,0.9948084,0.000028459224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99423426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14386515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14386515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3374207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790188748","doi":"","title":"Canada statute annotations : R.S.C. 1985, being a compilation of case annotations to the Revised Statutes covering the period 1971 to 1988","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Period (music); Statute of limitations; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026427720725243083,"score_gpt":0.27748338698159114,"score_spread":0.25105566625634806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790188748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031472896,0.018602526,0.004154391,0.028876923,0.013049027,0.000549402,0.24539122,0.002260426,0.68396884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029312415,0.0143859945,0.009253276,0.010989994,0.0011429241,0.0005087006,0.082924515,0.0012139734,0.8502682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948762,0.00017891159,0.00018569085,0.00036523552,0.00374981,0.0006440931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902507,0.0005707097,0.00026668364,0.00027010683,0.008393838,0.00024793297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015995953,0.0012283683,0.0007802946,0.009087755,0.009558848,0.0044174935,0.0024555426,0.0029230746,0.052164473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01039487,0.0008302674,0.0006491579,0.017189521,0.0023213893,0.0019376792,0.0011064253,0.0035569447,0.020043971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007499838,0.0000031817274,0.00015056547,0.00006682105,0.0000014698029,0.000021518004,0.00023752081,0.000050138275,0.000049872888,0.00751376,0.984559,0.0073386575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027205645,0.0000010713406,0.0018668217,0.00013176973,0.0000038307244,0.000014231361,0.00014608368,0.00003180075,0.000110251356,0.00069808203,0.996979,0.000014442162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99213684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06931559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06931559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14017345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5029222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790198200","doi":"","title":"The criminal law in Canadian society","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03360786720040559,"score_gpt":0.2998870056394943,"score_spread":0.2662791384390887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790198200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046249987,0.056596346,0.00056246243,0.09981764,0.0026996422,0.00008235269,0.0026480726,0.00016129503,0.8328071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114136524,0.09259008,0.0025584206,0.015901433,0.0012160897,0.000105253974,0.0016285918,0.00019601121,0.7716676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758816,0.00015903113,0.00006412131,0.00014476375,0.001364313,0.00067969377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964497,0.00040874886,0.00008469404,0.00010920504,0.0022439454,0.0007035932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011679878,0.0009900772,0.00064294034,0.0065240106,0.017914426,0.012777382,0.00189801,0.0033771999,0.05374896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005808565,0.0008570481,0.0005166745,0.013259126,0.009010698,0.0038793613,0.0019206337,0.003705471,0.003922775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058039886,0.000013653019,0.000925764,0.00015974278,0.0000061195083,0.00006046528,0.0022098317,0.00019853881,0.00004899346,0.20448188,0.7524317,0.039457574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002391472,0.0000027500691,0.0029052522,0.00021325743,0.0000083914665,0.000029088422,0.0023349845,0.00009153144,0.000028771447,0.009357975,0.9850037,0.000021917302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1920275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1920275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.411766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93713355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790302541","doi":"","title":"The criminal law in Canadian society: highlights = Le Droit penal dans la societe canadienne: faits saillants","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.019949912796070658,"score_gpt":0.25634187091507427,"score_spread":0.2363919581190036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790302541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049541956,0.26344037,0.0002674004,0.62771374,0.012237217,0.000068568814,0.0012409809,0.00005408815,0.090023436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09903718,0.6523866,0.0013253808,0.1041447,0.015730273,0.00014693514,0.0012710242,0.000115966206,0.12584195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997299,0.00025212596,0.00008314439,0.00020201861,0.0011523557,0.0010114339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936552,0.00088133715,0.00019137315,0.000081208265,0.0032660908,0.0019247805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025278474,0.0010225917,0.00063633523,0.004915872,0.017949745,0.015033722,0.0022188406,0.0063259383,0.016903507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050056274,0.00060425885,0.00075353665,0.016006932,0.009984961,0.006552127,0.0040117525,0.005709937,0.0011989555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008677459,0.000026829028,0.0016160675,0.00082955265,0.000012531271,0.00012224879,0.006213723,0.00013586911,0.00006601095,0.03982835,0.8975676,0.05357263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071212266,0.00000821282,0.013041806,0.0016635678,0.000027712424,0.00017621297,0.022854567,0.00008072289,0.00004802143,0.005054876,0.95698786,0.000049290073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99278295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12773933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12773933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39549175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.926818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790344710","doi":"","title":"The criminal code of Canada and the Canada evidence act, 1893: with an extra appendix containing the Extradition act, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminology; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04013733927693978,"score_gpt":0.27356838163152203,"score_spread":0.23343104235458226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790344710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026451182,0.02633803,0.0024261351,0.05194407,0.006200442,0.0004147613,0.0956483,0.0007908391,0.8135923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039155353,0.02383087,0.007100946,0.028265996,0.0010115522,0.0003786508,0.026295567,0.00062395894,0.8733372],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960885,0.00015776504,0.00013197763,0.00013513547,0.0028106843,0.00067602354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342525,0.00050914753,0.00019732739,0.00013222563,0.0052815154,0.00045450922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012053502,0.000745782,0.00043970984,0.0032113255,0.0066147754,0.003544839,0.0016331193,0.0033495226,0.04717154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008822222,0.0004663037,0.00054788595,0.0072018057,0.002142716,0.0015438382,0.00097072445,0.0034240151,0.015928479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052495425,0.000003283733,0.00015899037,0.000041463685,0.0000013088148,0.00001686977,0.0001589217,0.000028899263,0.00003005386,0.010425029,0.98254746,0.0065824497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033358035,0.0000022012807,0.003861945,0.00012758348,0.0000042668507,0.000030579613,0.00024758544,0.000039872804,0.00006699993,0.001067108,0.9945267,0.000021832726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98405325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99327224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054753833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054753833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16300084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3972687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790488308","doi":"","title":"Crankshaw's Criminal Code: being the Criminal Code of Canada with digests of cases, histories of sections, references to articles, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.044283130305471936,"score_gpt":0.2838823829009014,"score_spread":0.23959925259542947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790488308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008599176,0.08274958,0.0028986856,0.103723176,0.0076811737,0.0002474222,0.025285337,0.00089209626,0.7679234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08516938,0.054877695,0.0067172055,0.017413579,0.00096311735,0.00015416226,0.011553381,0.00059183437,0.82255965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982029,0.00008101288,0.000047340185,0.00008524355,0.0011888179,0.00039469972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997086,0.00028720795,0.00014867491,0.00007498636,0.0019054913,0.00049768644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072278955,0.00060805475,0.00030252832,0.0046584075,0.007515893,0.0056245523,0.0011140126,0.001948242,0.025597317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047213393,0.00038507523,0.0002559254,0.007679703,0.003261127,0.0023588166,0.0010239444,0.0020940078,0.0065695997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004787759,0.000003501874,0.0005704864,0.00006352475,0.000001407902,0.00003051377,0.00096144486,0.000034835128,0.000057310583,0.0147100305,0.9561367,0.027425557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017417153,0.0000025831748,0.0055102822,0.00021151957,0.0000029660341,0.000052953168,0.0016383278,0.000043542514,0.000080861915,0.002029634,0.9904067,0.000018914428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99471647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037458383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037458383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12903501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27178085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790588315","doi":"","title":"The British Columbia statute citator : a complete annotating service for R.S.B.C. 1960.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Service (business); Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03202747014790282,"score_gpt":0.26396795468914636,"score_spread":0.23194048454124355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790588315","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010051847,0.0018447719,0.007594978,0.0051228693,0.002462691,0.00045661788,0.6819158,0.015091833,0.28450528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067523904,0.0033831461,0.02062039,0.001714652,0.00038238248,0.00083420554,0.3866096,0.015175812,0.5645274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963869,0.00021865751,0.0002363005,0.00037698177,0.0023873781,0.0003938704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762548,0.0013346543,0.00045890425,0.0020315452,0.018985188,0.00093486696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002867408,0.0014739262,0.0020020534,0.016507464,0.008664015,0.0055190744,0.0031470368,0.0020412635,0.37786603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014571701,0.001388688,0.0008354038,0.029434495,0.0017762776,0.0034895688,0.0035430205,0.0033791696,0.38871068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074917507,0.0000027272556,0.00008444375,0.00009768807,0.0000019378647,0.0000152126295,0.000054668435,0.000017319224,0.00017213223,0.0006493025,0.9879503,0.010946713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051614584,0.000001290063,0.0013126001,0.00015490592,0.0000065446366,0.000029165258,0.00013990715,0.00009969177,0.00038780185,0.00069305836,0.9971414,0.00002846295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8440643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.913264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37786603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015120563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07518957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8873986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790606597","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Sub-Committee on the Recodification of the General Part of the Criminal Code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; House of Representatives; Select committee; Commons; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.04384357462903912,"score_gpt":0.26657919733828644,"score_spread":0.22273562270924732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790606597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022221995,0.005528939,0.00084176374,0.08565108,0.01276151,0.0011551498,0.09521082,0.0018741958,0.7947544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007393087,0.0015448006,0.00070823793,0.022216137,0.0005510886,0.00029951453,0.007449238,0.0005686975,0.9592692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914631,0.00027771652,0.00027346885,0.0004618148,0.00514456,0.0023793282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98709863,0.0012469249,0.0002697912,0.0004871748,0.008837381,0.002060061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034747599,0.0014762797,0.0017603617,0.004417212,0.0116960015,0.007466521,0.0054190634,0.013218107,0.24628775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103104655,0.0018063696,0.0019255219,0.007324089,0.002691247,0.0021852292,0.002443704,0.00956284,0.09713179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026638423,0.000018953622,0.00017818998,0.00007750158,0.0000063131,0.000037990423,0.000058319496,0.000038640723,0.000095280666,0.005737776,0.9878423,0.00588205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002437318,0.0000059473828,0.00377114,0.0001245558,0.000015726577,0.000013010562,0.00015947694,0.00010712852,0.00016867834,0.00077298447,0.99480385,0.000032958356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98862946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061892714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15963845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8239146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790794665","doi":"","title":"Dominion law reports: a weekly series of reports of cases from all the courts of Canada. (Third series).","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Series (stratigraphy); Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.020541186561807322,"score_gpt":0.24462839067208594,"score_spread":0.22408720411027863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790794665","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026123563,0.07623941,0.001489584,0.01448016,0.0062517193,0.0009461846,0.5412668,0.0039387685,0.32926387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09743175,0.068690844,0.0033499682,0.003815669,0.002052266,0.00045936057,0.21696077,0.0012559495,0.6059835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814844,0.000042901498,0.000085840686,0.000076429875,0.0013652825,0.00028113672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898342,0.000567924,0.000800784,0.00022930859,0.007763864,0.0008040213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007986877,0.0012172897,0.00041332952,0.020139921,0.002853457,0.0029897317,0.001996898,0.0007919212,0.043623988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063026766,0.00061731745,0.00039357407,0.021007646,0.00082717027,0.0011332117,0.0010440233,0.00073342887,0.012016681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010426703,0.00000808202,0.0023044434,0.00013488892,0.0000056823615,0.000061854254,0.0002477509,0.000030009793,0.000096320815,0.00021258478,0.9694343,0.027453572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067431793,0.000011268635,0.0722598,0.00039096753,0.000026222533,0.00028920273,0.0012470816,0.00009806821,0.00039328344,0.00013944446,0.9251096,0.000028284883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9630694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043623988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017549682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043044854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14593679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790800774","doi":"","title":"A manual of Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.04583158987747085,"score_gpt":0.3100708088843528,"score_spread":0.26423921900688196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790800774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007184748,0.0106372265,0.006450253,0.009085569,0.002658609,0.0008728853,0.07100488,0.0025158282,0.89605623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008013591,0.01751204,0.026109878,0.0040152664,0.00046307678,0.000925329,0.051517773,0.0012727013,0.8901703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967097,0.00022450702,0.00021897047,0.0002380509,0.0022848146,0.00032391102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176204,0.0007577665,0.00011745921,0.00029207155,0.0067380243,0.0003325522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018873663,0.0018460414,0.0010450538,0.017919727,0.008580836,0.0076782503,0.003794218,0.0020301733,0.20134282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008857454,0.0012436161,0.00097193354,0.0227457,0.0021246518,0.0036488532,0.0013872022,0.0031309712,0.06106403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032941718,0.0000071121885,0.00012471838,0.000090780864,0.0000014619653,0.000022908123,0.0002355229,0.00009858879,0.000034414035,0.023355883,0.93625605,0.039769318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014226846,0.0000011818723,0.0005870386,0.000090979695,0.0000019668487,0.000026362513,0.00012448407,0.000046168654,0.0000173147,0.0019864412,0.9971053,0.000011347495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9600632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20134282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05351135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12857667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67355883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790819898","doi":"","title":"Table of private acts: Statutes of Canada, 1867 to December 31, 1990.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Table (database); Business; Law; Political science; Database; Computer science","score_opus":0.017190522517333107,"score_gpt":0.25104132413655755,"score_spread":0.23385080161922445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790819898","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010773512,0.046944614,0.0005706246,0.01624518,0.0028012265,0.00038031573,0.5869625,0.00058458844,0.3347374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084287085,0.042690802,0.0024991513,0.008665514,0.00069383904,0.0004658717,0.12615944,0.00025728933,0.734281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997983,0.00004984623,0.00011051962,0.00014570946,0.0012017066,0.00050917146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538416,0.00026288276,0.00023699792,0.00007488715,0.0036859026,0.00035524982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000733827,0.0010452614,0.0007172956,0.00824188,0.0061861733,0.0033008298,0.0019662927,0.0016693018,0.02657693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042969226,0.0008518038,0.0005544823,0.019022562,0.0013968034,0.0012225553,0.00070546306,0.0022443784,0.0068625067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003013244,0.000019326331,0.0026008259,0.00019338085,0.0000119834895,0.000037625625,0.00048143807,0.0002617783,0.00004552753,0.010674058,0.970073,0.015571003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023086777,0.000011279639,0.065505296,0.00044228949,0.000025990726,0.000044793833,0.00080319954,0.00020688571,0.00012260892,0.001323082,0.9314459,0.00004566477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1031334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1031334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19020876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74828875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790921945","doi":"","title":"The Criminal statutes of Canada: with notes and a copious index","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Index (typography); Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019445782415580586,"score_gpt":0.2571724943953016,"score_spread":0.237726711979721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790921945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042769383,0.22239757,0.0020432854,0.07781019,0.012770056,0.00048978225,0.06620616,0.00084466976,0.6131614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042294797,0.25666863,0.0065787137,0.017671192,0.0052009686,0.00033721514,0.02972562,0.0007328685,0.6407901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688834,0.00009067114,0.0001212317,0.00014790997,0.0021245552,0.00062726485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927457,0.000706545,0.00019936469,0.00015589508,0.0055446224,0.0006477027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000925918,0.0015103617,0.001300805,0.026902722,0.010128012,0.009789666,0.0027324583,0.0026209883,0.031142715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067463764,0.0010759685,0.0007014297,0.063634485,0.0059240703,0.004251794,0.0015264796,0.0036319192,0.005868217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060444763,0.000010634743,0.0003063443,0.00022169203,0.0000037675275,0.000026732301,0.00032041094,0.00015358326,0.000036706435,0.030209312,0.9450106,0.02369419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024558599,0.0000028673437,0.0034281109,0.00032815343,0.000008492338,0.000029810697,0.00051012594,0.000066303764,0.000032040152,0.002870719,0.9926965,0.000024406869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12867089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12867089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2384955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.933577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791047618","doi":"","title":"Report of the Canadian Committee on Corrections: towards unity: criminal justice and corrections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.056761581302077806,"score_gpt":0.3178578366745517,"score_spread":0.2610962553724739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791047618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047449176,0.034267653,0.0018061586,0.6996616,0.040216267,0.0014588756,0.028686818,0.00080354215,0.18835422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044269457,0.0409123,0.008517106,0.13973029,0.0067367502,0.0009342207,0.014175791,0.00080010545,0.7439239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740694,0.0012014938,0.0010725731,0.001005453,0.01824062,0.004410427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374423,0.002931449,0.001281843,0.00089552463,0.0486401,0.008808835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012843618,0.0020230159,0.0014271697,0.008795839,0.01790374,0.010819,0.0049989014,0.017369583,0.02544952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02893634,0.0016023954,0.0018507474,0.009593251,0.004611487,0.0038387037,0.0049121697,0.012926714,0.0047254884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007847589,0.000009654099,0.00037748407,0.00007390878,0.000005996882,0.00001544191,0.00013127827,0.000062079445,0.000038789134,0.002618373,0.99179244,0.004866728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016593784,0.0000065067147,0.007388028,0.00032247766,0.00003595699,0.00001940217,0.0008595296,0.000117248994,0.00017112603,0.00088811776,0.9901164,0.00005861167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98908335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07991195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07991195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.56648827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5798045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791055735","doi":"","title":"A digest of the criminal law of Canada (crimes and punishments) founded by permission on Sir James Fitzjames Stephen's Digest of [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Permission; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.020375130130334224,"score_gpt":0.2635020390065998,"score_spread":0.24312690887626556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791055735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010352577,0.19970036,0.002647713,0.08563138,0.05419948,0.00037952408,0.03569836,0.001386854,0.61932105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003813492,0.04063758,0.0015857056,0.012130671,0.0050229933,0.00008074208,0.008496677,0.00044581725,0.92778623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998428,0.00008681078,0.00004817962,0.00007583001,0.0011693309,0.00019176843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708635,0.00029031213,0.00010680802,0.00010817117,0.002008213,0.000400142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078645727,0.0012743464,0.0008146472,0.0049558543,0.0036980463,0.0043283915,0.0013083378,0.001942291,0.10368245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036348675,0.00057337555,0.00052607426,0.008022464,0.0015979055,0.0018000415,0.0013199006,0.002406535,0.0390412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019988445,0.0000016810911,0.000025346575,0.000033521963,5.664121e-7,0.0000067731053,0.000034496334,0.0000117846785,0.000024307175,0.000736762,0.9924231,0.006699676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.4706875e-7,0.0000011411261,0.000648211,0.000075535834,8.214928e-7,0.000021169311,0.00005772504,0.000009373913,0.000018862629,0.00033731415,0.9988254,0.0000036768963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8182295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93439615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1817705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01893022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039950557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36568195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791056079","doi":"","title":"Tremeear's annotated Criminal Code, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminal justice; Computer science; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Programming language; Sociology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04127604396841739,"score_gpt":0.2924260998876329,"score_spread":0.2511500559192155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791056079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036294744,0.019462656,0.0018029991,0.030472027,0.00774025,0.00046395636,0.09212874,0.0013811949,0.84291863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008575147,0.006537398,0.001325167,0.0029534826,0.00022509543,0.000106802865,0.009526696,0.0003277489,0.97042245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978787,0.00009242184,0.00008124912,0.0001528328,0.0013299369,0.00046487007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541426,0.000270793,0.00007995654,0.00010181686,0.0038650117,0.00026811464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007983715,0.0011447149,0.00080170267,0.009366348,0.015039111,0.006920587,0.002078286,0.0027892326,0.09587571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063511035,0.0008216539,0.00069139886,0.01462557,0.0021193277,0.001967665,0.0011839782,0.0030413868,0.022737795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005769087,0.000004629654,0.00020039495,0.000047537953,0.0000014218763,0.000028637998,0.00016313152,0.00007104471,0.000021505726,0.0084352475,0.9738207,0.017200064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026203734,0.0000022323986,0.0017388667,0.00009478642,0.0000033167075,0.000030152218,0.00036137158,0.00005992934,0.00004441491,0.0009023492,0.9967449,0.0000150942715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99389774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99734515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09587571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06135643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17211841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4451741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791079309","doi":"","title":"A guide to using the Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science; Programming language; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.05192455960075113,"score_gpt":0.3319171390283961,"score_spread":0.27999257942764494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791079309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015519041,0.0405501,0.010621414,0.047411192,0.006578233,0.0010607389,0.048916638,0.0022192625,0.84109056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010605682,0.037938014,0.03077192,0.01443598,0.00063973834,0.0005382987,0.015955463,0.0012255822,0.88788944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967686,0.00026401572,0.00021020041,0.00018612728,0.0020795648,0.00049154874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893622,0.001078176,0.00019934114,0.00024175136,0.008379428,0.0007391286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017879775,0.0013183112,0.0008990241,0.013706235,0.010972745,0.008281438,0.0026121817,0.0033135014,0.09540789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010307969,0.0011865151,0.0008197383,0.01677387,0.0026930983,0.003743423,0.0016470522,0.004916441,0.027745068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028185368,0.0000099912095,0.00027433358,0.000074512696,0.0000021016879,0.000051655636,0.00038348205,0.00010713029,0.000046201523,0.024592932,0.93328685,0.041168064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015650809,0.0000024661686,0.0009549092,0.00019388401,0.0000026691487,0.000047186397,0.00038232357,0.000058996946,0.000031648313,0.0015487589,0.9967579,0.000017719689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09540789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051953144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1787909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37694824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791140533","doi":"","title":"A by-law to regulate the proceedings in the Municipal Council of the City of Toronto and the Committees thereof","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.03192229261658758,"score_gpt":0.2501108299370848,"score_spread":0.2181885373204972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791140533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009460455,0.008013106,0.005741121,0.15643877,0.008272789,0.00077837566,0.0012772649,0.00063174224,0.80938625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04776036,0.0012932768,0.0019497769,0.015574708,0.0006967183,0.00017153364,0.00020941834,0.00019860826,0.93214566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994892,0.0005706393,0.00024190966,0.0007031029,0.0020306564,0.001561586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938964,0.0012677689,0.0002923765,0.000580384,0.0023981195,0.0015649676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041052676,0.00078299997,0.00053753325,0.0012248631,0.017644547,0.011097888,0.00221132,0.00946551,0.03023399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011087448,0.0011444858,0.00059487583,0.0014501322,0.009631637,0.002957571,0.0023786929,0.011281572,0.0065111048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012346165,0.000017275159,0.00081699964,0.00006466257,0.000008687556,0.00012980796,0.0039390787,0.00020406669,0.00038574392,0.29527965,0.6889148,0.010226994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011715147,0.000011838103,0.002641468,0.000072202085,0.000011774982,0.000029482253,0.001895141,0.0001769384,0.00018135474,0.0039048125,0.99103177,0.000031520864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9183583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9745575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081641674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053470023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15280162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.387954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791186218","doi":"","title":"Your guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: including a complete text of the Charter, a discussion of its meaning [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0457075182645472,"score_gpt":0.2910619004155625,"score_spread":0.24535438215101532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791186218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078446226,0.0400326,0.009698269,0.058468413,0.009254589,0.00035390127,0.010290313,0.0011037614,0.8700137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0102927685,0.03264321,0.018813806,0.01621574,0.0010922005,0.00025176987,0.0038619535,0.0008227794,0.9160059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981343,0.0001342218,0.000044555276,0.0000994791,0.0013421586,0.00024529744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767965,0.00032497448,0.000057610676,0.00008557499,0.0016109626,0.00024135568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014099564,0.0010367701,0.0006310482,0.0044932854,0.006679705,0.005486027,0.0017556513,0.0025604274,0.0916012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049804593,0.0005136178,0.00062279886,0.007281463,0.0036375315,0.0038523613,0.0013696887,0.003994298,0.027417772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023871178,0.0000034793657,0.000048210688,0.000051943232,7.570983e-7,0.00002124462,0.0003323129,0.00003649414,0.000051895993,0.037613947,0.9405661,0.021271255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.4259156e-7,0.0000012517557,0.00030799198,0.000080407444,8.0247787e-7,0.000026359116,0.00022416854,0.000023442293,0.000032403103,0.0025843591,0.9967049,0.000012994416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90950537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9692746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026367739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0663861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30643654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791190925","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada relating to criminal law and to procedure in criminal cases: passed in the 2nd, 3rd [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Dominion; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032928937333050495,"score_gpt":0.2863090079949846,"score_spread":0.25338007066193413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791190925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01911914,0.06560009,0.0024720214,0.28035653,0.021573478,0.0006220071,0.014731631,0.00066802686,0.5948571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112105496,0.010976083,0.003012759,0.08508273,0.0014931393,0.00022902631,0.002085921,0.0003190459,0.78469586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915234,0.0005698644,0.00028976015,0.00037952245,0.005033181,0.0022044156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281585,0.0013055215,0.0003120354,0.00018896436,0.004417002,0.0009605948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039219516,0.0009241923,0.0008262501,0.002611404,0.018265655,0.006752223,0.0024455378,0.008725689,0.011986042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015362715,0.0010734766,0.0009565176,0.0032894975,0.0046674567,0.0015054517,0.0018921413,0.008625691,0.003042366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029196019,0.0000120429,0.000718956,0.000088430184,0.000012611394,0.00012217188,0.001970815,0.00008739494,0.00033038354,0.040105853,0.9449072,0.01161502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009901045,0.000008120149,0.0075485418,0.0001270709,0.000020403115,0.000049026563,0.0012433808,0.00008815688,0.0005263533,0.0013924913,0.9889275,0.000058981415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98322004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07873304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07873304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17449622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5712509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791192207","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal law, international and transnational aspects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.028662836394348135,"score_gpt":0.291074258910035,"score_spread":0.2624114225156869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791192207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026884668,0.12926102,0.0005436801,0.07387426,0.0042434325,0.000056490644,0.003042495,0.00012582097,0.7861642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0872001,0.19003285,0.0026234775,0.016439652,0.0023986679,0.00011343321,0.0023249628,0.0002321606,0.6986347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963903,0.00015075246,0.00010755191,0.00028964394,0.0022089707,0.0008528296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965994,0.00037047014,0.000094454874,0.000111546775,0.0023565658,0.00046758624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00164173,0.0012542892,0.00073482597,0.008696762,0.013025768,0.017179107,0.002328602,0.003691711,0.054267675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006078369,0.0007743853,0.0005999114,0.022383383,0.008394485,0.0050826212,0.0019224726,0.0036497996,0.0035378914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074642057,0.000018675282,0.00084451406,0.000260613,0.000009071743,0.000073397954,0.0013515931,0.00015065067,0.00006139821,0.229445,0.7183507,0.04942693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018826689,0.0000022710708,0.0021776524,0.00019072898,0.000009351392,0.0000362981,0.0012343996,0.00005514367,0.00002420374,0.007970529,0.988283,0.000014574085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99374866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12837768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12837768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26748225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9314496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791235451","doi":"","title":"Canada : La Cour supérieure du Québec précise que les demandeurs d'un recours collectif peuvent obtenir l'accès à la totalité des communications interceptées lors de l'enquête publique (Jacques/Pétroles Irving)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03328801142566479,"score_gpt":0.2844342081318829,"score_spread":0.2511461967062181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791235451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1803883,0.02277215,0.0072235004,0.14778683,0.0027260005,0.0002522626,0.0071109096,0.00032211075,0.63141793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6678216,0.0056527476,0.0026572617,0.012992854,0.00015713972,0.000073237774,0.00079311774,0.00013704518,0.3097149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970221,0.00027732106,0.000091441274,0.00034894995,0.001256515,0.0010036862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345773,0.0010934717,0.00039224466,0.00019625358,0.0039729737,0.00088737207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015314529,0.00043822225,0.00044254362,0.0023905982,0.014821264,0.007969166,0.0011537699,0.0025525885,0.016133841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006179525,0.00046608216,0.0004291751,0.0041660606,0.0037324382,0.00215054,0.0018037837,0.004552538,0.0006190591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001997358,0.00006005478,0.043258183,0.0005150353,0.00015305953,0.0016400788,0.04700384,0.0013224672,0.0016393141,0.45670202,0.345948,0.101558164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002237294,0.000019299394,0.06326528,0.0005717488,0.00007041459,0.00015638527,0.019360358,0.00049867295,0.000754371,0.005558592,0.90960044,0.00012208486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99920267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09638454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09638454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16965751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69932204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791290139","doi":"","title":"First principles: recodifying the general part of the Criminal Code of Canada: report of the Sub-Committee on the Recodification [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Law; Computer science; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.08850588311043471,"score_gpt":0.28603463486335984,"score_spread":0.1975287517529251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791290139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027122589,0.049932815,0.027445933,0.5530252,0.030057607,0.0053053307,0.038188722,0.002366914,0.26655498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14991991,0.03752804,0.091913216,0.2553875,0.0033201408,0.0033020126,0.02509348,0.002215277,0.4313205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9503643,0.0029419241,0.0032163898,0.0020234152,0.03472156,0.006732468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9013955,0.010122456,0.0021976344,0.0029284698,0.077587664,0.005768231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030441388,0.001658576,0.0013485535,0.010684944,0.018779615,0.011882276,0.00996038,0.015222509,0.006095704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08307875,0.0019785434,0.0019127859,0.008820347,0.0074022533,0.0039296187,0.005226545,0.014959131,0.0024146882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023496767,0.000042271477,0.0026263783,0.00027426906,0.000029561737,0.00012963808,0.0025597562,0.0005190253,0.00034272208,0.059395995,0.89706796,0.036988836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003740563,0.000028537826,0.01984918,0.001348733,0.0001126279,0.00014152918,0.0033367665,0.00071960245,0.0016363611,0.00959476,0.9629572,0.00023724565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99120027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10865608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10865608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52192616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7883587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791398884","doi":"","title":"Canada. Court Martial Appeal Board","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01939655142603287,"score_gpt":0.26431768439627884,"score_spread":0.24492113297024598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791398884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021382777,0.0030683794,0.00019831806,0.03584106,0.0052785804,0.00039298594,0.031713277,0.000967062,0.92040205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005248742,0.0006468838,0.00013128901,0.005313325,0.00022463677,0.00006569219,0.0025836802,0.00015536987,0.98563033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767786,0.00007365139,0.00006161973,0.00021162108,0.001160396,0.00081485295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927899,0.00042197324,0.00014483614,0.00019136375,0.004593966,0.0018579542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095470843,0.0008695604,0.0009360536,0.0039596893,0.01453842,0.0066561378,0.0032159125,0.006352647,0.5993685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005041971,0.0012165532,0.0009815781,0.004091556,0.0014916629,0.001511589,0.0018614571,0.0053120814,0.20038396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009724227,0.000016987082,0.00025667655,0.000024360594,0.0000018914466,0.000029967016,0.000018754488,0.000021214119,0.000014657696,0.0015556696,0.98897165,0.009078498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021861417,0.0000048703923,0.0038196174,0.00007139892,0.0000057411776,0.000021477828,0.00014475727,0.00011042747,0.000038371643,0.00065686094,0.99508744,0.000017256407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96306443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5993685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037417036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1153767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57145214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791535764","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Criminal Records Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal record; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030514366328622974,"score_gpt":0.291660578771269,"score_spread":0.261146212442646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791535764","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012538956,0.50292003,0.00026099465,0.042757776,0.015324149,0.0016999128,0.22311623,0.0007243494,0.21194263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01805957,0.59371555,0.0015605403,0.027043516,0.0029079786,0.0027142747,0.10204575,0.0006157078,0.25133714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534285,0.0005591631,0.0010918317,0.0004480674,0.0019787478,0.0005793103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96494126,0.004589386,0.004005977,0.0015782559,0.02273409,0.0021509957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041423095,0.0016615994,0.0022431826,0.035208028,0.004386333,0.0061991205,0.004148144,0.0036329892,0.18958126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02809109,0.0014835502,0.0014819701,0.051633183,0.0019315685,0.0027377126,0.002490547,0.0028927017,0.061917435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050092258,0.000010533375,0.00047423117,0.0051094517,0.00004423827,0.00006902546,0.000044182405,0.000024834077,0.000018090743,0.00047778155,0.94388765,0.049789827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051014893,0.000010810337,0.007848239,0.023143644,0.00022647492,0.00011666983,0.0002131219,0.000030009964,0.000058139336,0.0004683033,0.96779734,0.000036353293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84147507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8747978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18958126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02435314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11157502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6342125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791675951","doi":"","title":"Statutes of British Columbia : compiled for use of justices of the peace.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Statute of limitations; History","score_opus":0.040936044243725295,"score_gpt":0.2618984943051306,"score_spread":0.22096245006140533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791675951","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00875767,0.01666895,0.0011483259,0.0076869903,0.0025251165,0.0005711048,0.531988,0.001289442,0.42936438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049644656,0.015027707,0.003995528,0.0027497234,0.0002650655,0.00066461175,0.18060903,0.00064041576,0.7464032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844885,0.000059924947,0.00008564056,0.000119676115,0.0009533885,0.00033245553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994107,0.0002622477,0.00015370487,0.00013110678,0.00504238,0.00030358747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006339478,0.0008488893,0.0006178401,0.012369003,0.0047697504,0.0035686146,0.0019145273,0.0012517972,0.048130263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046590357,0.00083799736,0.00037035835,0.030181825,0.00081287575,0.0010106739,0.00080671336,0.0021246104,0.013390538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015325655,0.000010269541,0.0013164195,0.00018582256,0.0000060451775,0.00003824118,0.00023029328,0.00013311459,0.000061697574,0.0031227502,0.9720881,0.022791952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009983099,0.0000037904574,0.024428423,0.0003395545,0.000016369975,0.000035385732,0.0007900483,0.00014457306,0.00018035322,0.0008616415,0.9731612,0.00002863179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048130263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04411223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09338906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32005817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791784496","doi":"10.29173/alr1367","title":"Searching for Truth but Missing the Point","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Perception; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Process (computing); Criminal trial; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11667165081332377,"score_gpt":0.37442881498338926,"score_spread":0.2577571641700655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791784496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04327667,0.0748898,0.06516249,0.62976485,0.0044012633,0.000116281924,0.00016816532,0.000092116854,0.18212827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85564417,0.043190263,0.023914933,0.054892626,0.004318217,0.00014795769,0.00014983532,0.000078732905,0.017663406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98128766,0.009545908,0.0011411073,0.0015214452,0.0056382427,0.00086564256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138526,0.07278689,0.0039176093,0.0030207706,0.0053764996,0.001045733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024124712,0.00032440491,0.00148021,0.0033292135,0.003689013,0.008672751,0.0017566795,0.007849042,0.0077613406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08853907,0.00045367627,0.0007353366,0.001459289,0.0219543,0.019978942,0.0043756715,0.008491869,0.0015519956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006253414,0.000034261306,0.0009790992,0.00042322624,0.000037719296,0.00035976426,0.0024660085,0.0003348166,0.00026553866,0.94657904,0.008419481,0.040038545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032630385,0.000049582308,0.00043820086,0.0007916761,0.000026827405,0.00027529482,0.0021217512,0.00037014476,0.0003543508,0.94760686,0.047913715,0.000018939701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020914795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023748926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99790853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002955825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007969105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12758517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791820295","doi":"","title":"The prerogative writs in Canadian criminal law and procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.027291115713064328,"score_gpt":0.2964880012928698,"score_spread":0.2691968855798055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791820295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004918137,0.04958396,0.0013692066,0.067609556,0.0024149935,0.0000753389,0.00077277364,0.00011903436,0.87313694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20200701,0.047043256,0.0037769778,0.016173935,0.0011450878,0.00013443707,0.0005619665,0.0002499652,0.72890735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407476,0.0005404821,0.00015992734,0.00035833404,0.0034437948,0.0014226559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948165,0.0014571352,0.0001457799,0.00022008202,0.002778591,0.0005819407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002710611,0.0008897743,0.0007058821,0.0073755174,0.022248987,0.016029177,0.0032127071,0.0047729956,0.029719966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011410436,0.00092064694,0.00062284817,0.010596829,0.022027066,0.005650406,0.0023593812,0.007249224,0.0023777764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006436275,0.000008991996,0.00031665608,0.000105587525,0.000002992963,0.00005500391,0.0048721964,0.00011319183,0.000037509693,0.6783701,0.2775423,0.038569067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028374668,0.000003949996,0.0025723309,0.0003404629,0.000008872875,0.000044788674,0.004590202,0.000104296116,0.000063705156,0.03926741,0.9529675,0.000033608285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16296384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16296384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29777956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9708433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791854956","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code and other selected statutes of Canada: with the amendments passed up to the end of the session of Parliament, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Statute; Session (web analytics); Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Statute of limitations; Business; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02499127191965161,"score_gpt":0.2727245933309915,"score_spread":0.2477333214113399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791854956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011130927,0.021601971,0.0020466805,0.16747868,0.008304253,0.00048053422,0.023506416,0.0006270618,0.7648235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08651662,0.011872568,0.005101765,0.042566173,0.000975398,0.00025617288,0.005573553,0.00029454823,0.84684324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504614,0.00015462452,0.000108103544,0.0002010744,0.0031209001,0.001369207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959312,0.0003776719,0.00010873678,0.00008244661,0.0029429086,0.0005570425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566527,0.00080497557,0.0004355934,0.0033965076,0.013614111,0.007944173,0.0019615765,0.005328166,0.017938543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006708065,0.0005736404,0.000750492,0.0049132463,0.0035388076,0.001508295,0.0009720937,0.0049464954,0.0040718797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018525703,0.000016674683,0.00075872085,0.0000909288,0.0000065157483,0.00007102908,0.00091317284,0.00011112476,0.00020137549,0.06240294,0.91938734,0.016021604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010399794,0.000006575345,0.0065903594,0.00010701912,0.000014343696,0.000027238691,0.0009068129,0.00010913208,0.00027172882,0.0023200952,0.9895879,0.00004832446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99480385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99824417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0923877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0923877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25807634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6703228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791882989","doi":"","title":"Pocket dictionary of Canadian law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027378203416501937,"score_gpt":0.2566357099408883,"score_spread":0.22925750652438637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791882989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037752412,0.018286137,0.0004712018,0.008079034,0.0019738,0.00013022173,0.022581598,0.00041967892,0.9476807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039765933,0.019099547,0.00091106154,0.0023260268,0.00033945698,0.000095608986,0.0067073535,0.0002204768,0.96632385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979498,0.00008038719,0.00007474589,0.00015706,0.0013793661,0.00035874298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969919,0.00020412897,0.00006747977,0.00013317807,0.0023328962,0.00027041067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007827485,0.001640707,0.0009988111,0.013912353,0.009506515,0.009871155,0.0026085614,0.0023233958,0.26514152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046268604,0.0008045811,0.00064667093,0.026128935,0.0026298922,0.0033162155,0.0015244002,0.0033245825,0.076336935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035568503,0.000005626936,0.00007151603,0.00009240601,0.0000012011693,0.00002061902,0.00018630567,0.00004355549,0.000017224289,0.025357839,0.95233625,0.021863936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.8795083e-7,5.7269676e-7,0.00020961728,0.00006370076,9.554403e-7,0.000009007632,0.00007980926,0.00001081019,0.000006113602,0.00079864805,0.9988164,0.000003857239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26514152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06304436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15876117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88698673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791987152","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of Manitoba : passed in the session held in the ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Statute; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022801570599286558,"score_gpt":0.261809003778329,"score_spread":0.23900743317904244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791987152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031085666,0.022417279,0.0015027012,0.07849392,0.0072245654,0.0007892623,0.08808395,0.0008746516,0.76952803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081140175,0.0056478647,0.0025966195,0.010368001,0.0002986494,0.00033183646,0.009439605,0.00015826811,0.890019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910164,0.000056758006,0.000038000897,0.000073185314,0.00044412786,0.00028634522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982016,0.00016597332,0.000066975175,0.000067982925,0.0012786534,0.00021878268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010630464,0.00055383047,0.00044775676,0.0026505096,0.0076678554,0.0029676938,0.0019041328,0.002370307,0.034687165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003010494,0.00078284694,0.0004142154,0.005342189,0.0018605536,0.0008468997,0.0009802356,0.0025521964,0.0051961397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004186889,0.00003655319,0.0051717553,0.00018914319,0.000013413124,0.00013467734,0.0021521861,0.00016160571,0.0005077699,0.055843912,0.91524947,0.020497577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002001317,0.000011869211,0.03535973,0.0002439529,0.00001746454,0.00005195469,0.0025541433,0.00014658597,0.0004421758,0.0018994779,0.95921713,0.000035509143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98095816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035965204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035965204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11003721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26094705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792076423","doi":"","title":"Rethinking criminal law theory: new Canadian perspectives in the philosophy of domestic, transnational, and international criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Public law; Comparative law; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06883193463250704,"score_gpt":0.32392304830760876,"score_spread":0.25509111367510173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792076423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010996767,0.055037793,0.011812389,0.42936602,0.003288377,0.00004605955,0.0003989981,0.00010071121,0.48895296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672719,0.09686415,0.020013465,0.061170932,0.002515136,0.00017393623,0.00040569482,0.00044608815,0.1511388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398285,0.0016458837,0.000141383,0.0005327019,0.0023761094,0.0013210311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902535,0.0041492363,0.0002750271,0.0003953335,0.0038719918,0.0010549448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069409646,0.0010933486,0.001134364,0.007693994,0.023392053,0.018592214,0.003517858,0.00542533,0.01280611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119352145,0.0005941075,0.0008353927,0.012538637,0.06481605,0.015413332,0.0045103473,0.010832408,0.0007087924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038141739,0.0000057722573,0.00019338366,0.00004022695,0.0000026815499,0.000025445135,0.0055582887,0.00011068549,0.000018259127,0.96129936,0.025651924,0.0070902174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011170143,0.0000070499345,0.0017596799,0.00060882024,0.000023847439,0.0000631994,0.019661207,0.0009168807,0.00008185499,0.5551236,0.42168894,0.000053742107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9754093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17123516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17123516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24591216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96124977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792150346","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal code offences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Criminology; Code (set theory); Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04939344378777781,"score_gpt":0.31130212759855236,"score_spread":0.26190868381077453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792150346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014505208,0.008355673,0.00025239855,0.010514185,0.0030492786,0.0001576442,0.025035603,0.00031827667,0.9508664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009801466,0.008125759,0.0005646069,0.0023600694,0.0003243434,0.000065192224,0.008624616,0.000107403066,0.97002655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976547,0.000058952905,0.00006252392,0.00016112225,0.0014921515,0.000570585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618965,0.00015029278,0.00007816228,0.00011531736,0.002989773,0.000476823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069479266,0.0013305024,0.00071019947,0.009460196,0.01052474,0.005747385,0.0023663288,0.0025762771,0.19146207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005136211,0.0009639568,0.000979424,0.008418393,0.0014125071,0.0014173883,0.0013336323,0.0025774364,0.038996153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026835214,0.0000052241417,0.00024335283,0.00003393915,0.0000014856038,0.0000158162,0.00006495039,0.000030457813,0.000009350319,0.0044726664,0.9805283,0.014591661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026014275,0.0000025268735,0.0036275242,0.000097641314,0.0000052521923,0.000036756068,0.00021835905,0.000045377034,0.000023591483,0.0006717189,0.99525744,0.000011233115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98864645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99631196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04925918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14387208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6405044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792341683","doi":"","title":"A treatise on the criminal law of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03993453976252985,"score_gpt":0.2771795110867957,"score_spread":0.23724497132426586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792341683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026608105,0.108640164,0.0011407798,0.17793599,0.009738364,0.00014563216,0.0025723504,0.00009893494,0.69706696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062095527,0.08111697,0.0021237906,0.08727527,0.0031364576,0.00020875616,0.0009151695,0.00019085113,0.7629371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489695,0.00034025905,0.00013365269,0.00032540402,0.003006624,0.0012971218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961928,0.00082360004,0.00009401067,0.00009845547,0.0022784825,0.00051262614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018791327,0.0010987358,0.0008966949,0.005087125,0.021936845,0.010850505,0.0026518006,0.008907502,0.025754325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007523014,0.000929659,0.0010841835,0.007614325,0.008093497,0.0028523388,0.0018938197,0.010728116,0.00232856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011020189,0.000011158474,0.00025219368,0.00009600992,0.0000095569085,0.000075536555,0.0009601335,0.00017991631,0.00004446909,0.28403008,0.7030027,0.011327275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079551355,0.000004099822,0.0013655951,0.00031441683,0.000015462725,0.000034883164,0.0005817638,0.00007467549,0.00004748836,0.011487391,0.9860363,0.000029995039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11953271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11953271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30175212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8672746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792538670","doi":"","title":"Supplement to the Criminal Code and the Canada Evidence Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.048854105201100145,"score_gpt":0.3100154661500383,"score_spread":0.26116136094893816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792538670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083079084,0.03670769,0.0009987144,0.08889076,0.030814685,0.00035549994,0.027266806,0.0004887213,0.8136463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046728402,0.0085081775,0.0011430895,0.019752933,0.0045752735,0.00013346257,0.0038447303,0.00014918574,0.95722044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961218,0.0002211502,0.00016711482,0.00023390149,0.0028397888,0.00041623946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985748,0.0020831008,0.00026793024,0.00058583694,0.010530409,0.0007846758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018426295,0.0012354755,0.0011903645,0.008163168,0.0075681815,0.0075564617,0.0031807944,0.008639925,0.115666494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013942397,0.0009338119,0.0009499567,0.008098624,0.002649185,0.0025455432,0.0018660076,0.0046781106,0.03928016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002912769,0.0000045658744,0.000023717972,0.00003030322,9.321176e-7,0.0000085885395,0.000034956713,0.000025509547,0.000009725281,0.0049693794,0.99103045,0.0038589342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003197443,0.0000019630218,0.0005730847,0.00008213146,0.000002975386,0.000011866851,0.0000460776,0.000026595586,0.000018248991,0.0013368053,0.997888,0.000009021567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92340183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95674986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043250162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08978217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38694298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792641917","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Québec.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02324458454230403,"score_gpt":0.26495313608822363,"score_spread":0.2417085515459196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792641917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004759774,0.020916494,0.00087986904,0.0133953,0.0015789798,0.00015980554,0.087646306,0.000583438,0.87008005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030838402,0.0053723278,0.0009459383,0.0028111562,0.00012900424,0.00013439186,0.009734334,0.00014204116,0.9498925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988397,0.00007644153,0.000046699795,0.0001296085,0.00062335026,0.00028430417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805486,0.00018424208,0.000069591035,0.00009931932,0.0014478058,0.00014421855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006343878,0.00076143356,0.0006484524,0.0028605382,0.0059733493,0.0039580325,0.0014329527,0.0021880735,0.12610705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028802524,0.00070061797,0.0005092538,0.0066606575,0.0011271703,0.0012974772,0.0006487215,0.0024989294,0.015272103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021789994,0.000019382473,0.0014315004,0.00010011283,0.000010354309,0.00005629242,0.00021748629,0.00019706272,0.000082887214,0.03701259,0.93343836,0.027412077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001176868,0.0000060380057,0.009812543,0.00014816907,0.000009747956,0.000027202881,0.00021617065,0.00019701097,0.00009897241,0.0012583788,0.98819447,0.00001949968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99298733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12610705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045230187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062764704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4218701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792702472","doi":"","title":"Agreement between Province of Manitoba and the Manitoba Association of Crown Attorneys","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Association (psychology); Archaeology; History; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.028680706019230298,"score_gpt":0.265915980947636,"score_spread":0.23723527492840574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792702472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09083796,0.00963871,0.002119931,0.10816909,0.004821744,0.0013481014,0.016321369,0.0005946568,0.7661484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14331886,0.0029853273,0.003761863,0.02039014,0.00030513547,0.00051726407,0.0033395488,0.00015697001,0.82522476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948547,0.00040044717,0.00028019858,0.0004542233,0.0018353611,0.0021750147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799762,0.0028731946,0.0004995585,0.0008273403,0.012080714,0.00374308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044158623,0.00034607196,0.0005776043,0.003171154,0.012018358,0.0056717256,0.0027265237,0.0039554317,0.03862304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011766621,0.001170786,0.00060005893,0.0061562643,0.0020329433,0.0013571506,0.0023995657,0.0030071852,0.004046811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018767171,0.00010722723,0.03410915,0.00035088768,0.00006666456,0.0008072911,0.0066189407,0.00033778686,0.0014558677,0.093506336,0.823152,0.039300144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004033273,0.000018840847,0.06714576,0.0003167638,0.000031118245,0.00013851511,0.004649586,0.00023564034,0.0003903343,0.0012116159,0.92577535,0.00004613493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96220446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04137756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04137756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.251467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30021662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792716262","doi":"","title":"The Canada statute citator; a complete annotating service for R.S.C. 1952 and the Criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Service (business); Political science; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04900938342915353,"score_gpt":0.2959298449750608,"score_spread":0.24692046154590727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792716262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007171576,0.0014697224,0.00546691,0.0064645032,0.0027882613,0.0005127172,0.42827925,0.008832313,0.5454691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0069313454,0.0022953954,0.014624621,0.0029381143,0.0005019302,0.00048087563,0.13645718,0.008815491,0.826955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383104,0.00022198672,0.00023713597,0.00037162998,0.004696119,0.0006420287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731354,0.0015084645,0.00047375174,0.0014077529,0.022482146,0.0009925326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002439284,0.0011733784,0.0016111219,0.016240105,0.011022762,0.0062002754,0.0029404324,0.002567101,0.381835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016176654,0.0011748816,0.00085226004,0.024591632,0.002404884,0.0035636418,0.0028418514,0.0034332585,0.28188494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046389237,0.0000018499251,0.00007078977,0.00005615757,0.0000011601967,0.00001730637,0.00007417021,0.000016473412,0.00008501597,0.002616139,0.98763895,0.009417422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028248835,6.8573286e-7,0.00064995664,0.000068725574,0.0000025004274,0.000018834271,0.000101854115,0.00004943545,0.00015525775,0.00068779406,0.998242,0.000020194993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9376285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96793145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.381835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030896192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12103899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88173735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792742115","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code of Canada as in force on January 1st, 1901: with the reported cases and appendices containing, the Canada Evidence [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.041906672062771724,"score_gpt":0.29158636369918006,"score_spread":0.24967969163640835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792742115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012887692,0.03022998,0.0011039986,0.0587073,0.00796091,0.00039155397,0.20462535,0.0007264465,0.6833668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112249695,0.030376317,0.0029867035,0.020850787,0.0010149829,0.00027615906,0.050465114,0.00043081396,0.7813495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978502,0.000047964473,0.00006285971,0.00008664297,0.0014993617,0.0004530399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964735,0.00021865526,0.0001352447,0.00006442759,0.0028153367,0.00029278485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059037015,0.00052979856,0.00038613187,0.0037010182,0.006195884,0.002920631,0.0014475101,0.0019384236,0.019977065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065728934,0.00044862425,0.000363092,0.006951734,0.0013971154,0.0007840269,0.0006902033,0.0025656498,0.006379026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071179793,0.0000034730383,0.00074756023,0.000083447565,0.000002915385,0.0000394019,0.00041783016,0.00004248332,0.000044069453,0.0063674804,0.98180515,0.010439157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040318373,0.0000050094404,0.021558778,0.0003246229,0.000011095682,0.00006495666,0.0008348797,0.000061684164,0.00016503825,0.00070756057,0.97623265,0.000029733115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9588635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041136503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12005232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29846764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792761314","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms = la charte canadienne des droits et libertes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.01364356158585045,"score_gpt":0.24149461988505658,"score_spread":0.22785105829920613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792761314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017468773,0.033673782,0.001693671,0.049959105,0.0053909156,0.00013400218,0.0071921796,0.00022399685,0.89998555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09238367,0.050024282,0.00856722,0.023411019,0.0017100803,0.00028044044,0.0037992217,0.0003449731,0.8194792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928698,0.0004190591,0.00017779563,0.00046759364,0.004850952,0.0012148134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961928,0.0005022955,0.00015601119,0.00023350248,0.002489481,0.00042585505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026282768,0.0010168885,0.0007456008,0.0052338587,0.011342032,0.01425445,0.002002563,0.0041189054,0.048601836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00700996,0.0008347812,0.0006702483,0.009949952,0.0099934675,0.004515062,0.002050959,0.0068375254,0.00478656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068106856,0.00000614001,0.00028000463,0.000099912446,0.0000043056248,0.00002248104,0.0006736746,0.00007393688,0.00003674315,0.39082894,0.59021485,0.017752208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033096792,0.0000014393553,0.0012765239,0.00013949341,0.0000033146887,0.000021216425,0.00038823404,0.00002980135,0.000039663933,0.010471224,0.98760414,0.00002158719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99101394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99425584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088721275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088721275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2857538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6437209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792833204","doi":"","title":"The Criminal code and other selected statutes of Canada: with the amendments passed up to the end of the session of Parliament, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Statute; Session (web analytics); Law; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminal code; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.02499127191965161,"score_gpt":0.2727245933309915,"score_spread":0.2477333214113399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792833204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011130927,0.021601971,0.0020466805,0.16747868,0.008304253,0.00048053422,0.023506416,0.0006270618,0.7648235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08651662,0.011872568,0.005101765,0.042566173,0.000975398,0.00025617288,0.005573553,0.00029454823,0.84684324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504614,0.00015462452,0.000108103544,0.0002010744,0.0031209001,0.001369207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959312,0.0003776719,0.00010873678,0.00008244661,0.0029429086,0.0005570425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001566527,0.00080497557,0.0004355934,0.0033965076,0.013614111,0.007944173,0.0019615765,0.005328166,0.017938543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006708065,0.0005736404,0.000750492,0.0049132463,0.0035388076,0.001508295,0.0009720937,0.0049464954,0.0040718797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018525703,0.000016674683,0.00075872085,0.0000909288,0.0000065157483,0.00007102908,0.00091317284,0.00011112476,0.00020137549,0.06240294,0.91938734,0.016021604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010399794,0.000006575345,0.0065903594,0.00010701912,0.000014343696,0.000027238691,0.0009068129,0.00010913208,0.00027172882,0.0023200952,0.9895879,0.00004832446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99480385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99824417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0923877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0923877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25807634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6703228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792932786","doi":"","title":"British Columbia annual criminal practice 2013","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.017151396963118206,"score_gpt":0.2668256818071106,"score_spread":0.24967428484399237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792932786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005410025,0.020781916,0.0004162748,0.048937187,0.009193118,0.00022109736,0.027630277,0.0004988376,0.8869113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004624666,0.0037173599,0.00018756423,0.001622307,0.00013825385,0.00004508798,0.002029269,0.00005348293,0.9875821],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988998,0.00006245591,0.000053189055,0.00007806103,0.00059662294,0.00030978737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760216,0.000114509,0.00006238727,0.00007974447,0.0016383271,0.00050292606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085120415,0.00083018036,0.0005381766,0.0032203132,0.007339567,0.004654233,0.0016246762,0.003866238,0.19629227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032901573,0.0008958439,0.00045023146,0.003919307,0.0009405383,0.0010294705,0.0013724784,0.0032757386,0.047897235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006306201,0.000008864101,0.00031452999,0.000028176233,0.0000012967198,0.000019576255,0.000036369474,0.00003057116,0.000013090725,0.0013296964,0.9802918,0.017919669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004745029,0.0000035461399,0.0047047925,0.00019221666,0.0000044616077,0.000029764667,0.0002859154,0.00006670362,0.000035367055,0.00047928237,0.99418086,0.000012359635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90596664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19629227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025865959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0796873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65666306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792952382","doi":"","title":"Canada. Exchequer Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exchequer; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0157652570926837,"score_gpt":0.23879631468319712,"score_spread":0.22303105759051342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792952382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089823164,0.001093628,0.00011941527,0.01358672,0.0017373703,0.00009606815,0.0065934616,0.00038324035,0.975492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005271581,0.0003766664,0.000077768804,0.0038030823,0.00015967077,0.000032664557,0.00092727726,0.0001426015,0.98920864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744356,0.00008100577,0.000059278147,0.00021384108,0.001295228,0.00090708927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948689,0.00053619134,0.00011471614,0.00031435688,0.0030825972,0.0010833532],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010335506,0.00087776803,0.00118353,0.0034320415,0.0149003295,0.008849785,0.00299482,0.009525801,0.67662865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060379077,0.0010731473,0.000993956,0.0044219918,0.0017761979,0.0020227588,0.0022420753,0.0067859874,0.25274965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017634391,0.000022402397,0.00020828238,0.000028473725,0.000003898749,0.00006681783,0.00003202957,0.000042498577,0.000024427909,0.009235382,0.9787431,0.011575007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026161473,0.0000055360783,0.0014225768,0.000073732765,0.000007746884,0.00003821279,0.00011703097,0.00014789517,0.00006576096,0.0024685343,0.9956067,0.000020110432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91339535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67662865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028119557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07896755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46124995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792958058","doi":"","title":"The Criminal law consolidation and amendment acts of 1869, 32-33 Vict. for the Dominion of Canada. Vol. I: as amended and in force on [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Law; Political science; Consolidation (business); Criminal law; Amendment; Business","score_opus":0.028167435135798117,"score_gpt":0.2954097752682783,"score_spread":0.26724234013248016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792958058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012067886,0.069332816,0.002431911,0.08499063,0.012257723,0.00061676867,0.018673275,0.0004401084,0.799189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092689015,0.00825166,0.0024113618,0.026032558,0.0009618638,0.00035109033,0.0025757682,0.0001802309,0.8665465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921862,0.00053622853,0.00039203226,0.0004951014,0.0045153373,0.0018750514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.00027128228,0.00016902259,0.00014070838,0.0023064169,0.00025451576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00263968,0.0011081552,0.00056143326,0.0031764293,0.018247789,0.006032264,0.001752823,0.00609519,0.012515409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010428224,0.0010744444,0.0009951983,0.0035861232,0.0059799445,0.0020193837,0.002274234,0.008945243,0.004788432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003771747,0.00002039025,0.0010786303,0.000078897676,0.000009028423,0.00015280311,0.0030371926,0.00019450752,0.00021076977,0.14496788,0.83139765,0.018814513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011834638,0.0000073468577,0.0057938104,0.00016189329,0.000012169273,0.000059368373,0.00062421075,0.000066124245,0.00030710667,0.004567767,0.9883532,0.000035195437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96720606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073031045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073031045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11474468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5298798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792985396","doi":"","title":"A century of criminal justice: perspectives on the development of Canadian law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.055322879923309275,"score_gpt":0.30540764920909336,"score_spread":0.2500847692857841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792985396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053528035,0.105471045,0.0013311165,0.3294827,0.003960137,0.00005099095,0.0005021916,0.0000627859,0.5537863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.415688,0.20364302,0.0055997106,0.081700705,0.0037057884,0.00018019443,0.000530632,0.00021963315,0.2887323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370944,0.0007642244,0.00012255421,0.0004340596,0.0027137655,0.0022558707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936092,0.0013651607,0.0002519407,0.00014728853,0.0031669778,0.00145952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003701454,0.0008542259,0.00076578656,0.0065821474,0.032164846,0.020301526,0.0034560056,0.00750578,0.020396255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011934922,0.0005747974,0.0006131662,0.010500173,0.0381385,0.0089293085,0.0039625918,0.0076668826,0.0010628541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074423706,0.000010538111,0.00029371426,0.00008996579,0.0000032897008,0.00007542371,0.006376175,0.00012390249,0.000027362992,0.8411807,0.13749258,0.014318901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065507675,0.0000048205225,0.0022600999,0.00056594715,0.000008004788,0.00007853596,0.009258432,0.00018645273,0.00004058438,0.08768699,0.899864,0.000039532602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99077374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23817754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23817754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40205657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8836061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793118442","doi":"","title":"Criminal law and the Canadian criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04248858460950564,"score_gpt":0.2998926238185834,"score_spread":0.25740403920907773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793118442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037072932,0.06163056,0.00086398487,0.10272176,0.0033042536,0.00009017321,0.0042319885,0.00015994051,0.82329005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1463816,0.0820278,0.0033404394,0.02628211,0.0019472648,0.00016674353,0.0026180607,0.00024911715,0.73698694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565303,0.00030196627,0.000092851966,0.00025938562,0.002466165,0.0012265831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936912,0.00096960453,0.00021024887,0.00018397439,0.003807462,0.0011375045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016483803,0.0009781035,0.000633711,0.007806827,0.0170424,0.012741079,0.0024405944,0.0050811437,0.045940977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010256348,0.0008382034,0.00069965544,0.011297145,0.009933623,0.00372519,0.0018393926,0.004905245,0.0034290613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009333326,0.000010042566,0.0007058437,0.000108945394,0.000005651983,0.000056487203,0.001122145,0.00021780384,0.000034003806,0.3259502,0.6456656,0.026114022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048244615,0.000003527165,0.0045171613,0.00031098846,0.000010751692,0.000030551673,0.0013940055,0.00016075076,0.00003385318,0.018512117,0.9749843,0.00003718317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1804558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1804558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37205473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793206150","doi":"","title":"Criminal law and the Canadian criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04248858460950564,"score_gpt":0.2998926238185834,"score_spread":0.25740403920907773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793206150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037072932,0.06163056,0.00086398487,0.10272176,0.0033042536,0.00009017321,0.0042319885,0.00015994051,0.82329005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1463816,0.0820278,0.0033404394,0.02628211,0.0019472648,0.00016674353,0.0026180607,0.00024911715,0.73698694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565303,0.00030196627,0.000092851966,0.00025938562,0.002466165,0.0012265831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936912,0.00096960453,0.00021024887,0.00018397439,0.003807462,0.0011375045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016483803,0.0009781035,0.000633711,0.007806827,0.0170424,0.012741079,0.0024405944,0.0050811437,0.045940977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010256348,0.0008382034,0.00069965544,0.011297145,0.009933623,0.00372519,0.0018393926,0.004905245,0.0034290613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009333326,0.000010042566,0.0007058437,0.000108945394,0.000005651983,0.000056487203,0.001122145,0.00021780384,0.000034003806,0.3259502,0.6456656,0.026114022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048244615,0.000003527165,0.0045171613,0.00031098846,0.000010751692,0.000030551673,0.0013940055,0.00016075076,0.00003385318,0.018512117,0.9749843,0.00003718317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1804558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1804558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37205473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793311086","doi":"","title":"The birth of a criminal code: the evolution of Canada's justice system","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminal code; Law; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0229213517737482,"score_gpt":0.2662652306118718,"score_spread":0.24334387883812358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793311086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060740486,0.022104047,0.0022588712,0.24062881,0.0021409155,0.00014000853,0.0042776735,0.00027280403,0.6674363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7001725,0.016923232,0.0045802896,0.020869473,0.00046288784,0.000088966306,0.0013118263,0.000420089,0.25517073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417555,0.00049605296,0.00009116508,0.00042146508,0.0025952677,0.0022205794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98778707,0.0011995552,0.00040671322,0.00025894446,0.006809161,0.0035384384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016886,0.00040551266,0.0005186262,0.0050845095,0.022869803,0.016964663,0.0026185578,0.0038307945,0.019453965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013320059,0.00058786955,0.00043641802,0.0086222915,0.0166881,0.004101337,0.0028544066,0.0050423583,0.0012914379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036018137,0.000030491421,0.006353453,0.00011945812,0.000018837676,0.00022226572,0.017124264,0.0006518974,0.00019800628,0.6443933,0.25315288,0.077699125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013838487,0.000015531425,0.029128509,0.00042093958,0.000020162184,0.00009119937,0.012064821,0.0005171625,0.00015003131,0.023917925,0.9335731,0.00008675837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99906105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24143592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24143592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44416177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87982684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793332329","doi":"","title":"First annual conference of the British Columbia Provincial Judges' Association, held at Kamloops, British Columbia, September [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Columbia university; Association (psychology); History; Geography; Archaeology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.011363817551093074,"score_gpt":0.2101160875403808,"score_spread":0.19875226998928772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793332329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019398926,0.03217852,0.0012156091,0.20150158,0.02990735,0.0004986503,0.011581694,0.00046409198,0.7032536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01737168,0.0026515033,0.00049521326,0.0038064304,0.0004657236,0.000057165216,0.0010868782,0.00007815339,0.97398734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880016,0.00009719851,0.000034241864,0.00010733458,0.0005374104,0.00042359525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745697,0.00011400747,0.00004003657,0.00005477384,0.0016816825,0.0006524756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015171083,0.0006082005,0.00047027334,0.0012088238,0.013663421,0.0043497626,0.0011306416,0.0029599357,0.06820727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002797884,0.00053185987,0.000300947,0.0015312852,0.0013161045,0.00089055585,0.0013299031,0.003410749,0.015111455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019416966,0.00000962222,0.0007009915,0.000029972456,0.0000023432804,0.000053160926,0.0002067023,0.000033457774,0.00012134933,0.0008136084,0.9881876,0.009821688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047591125,0.0000042334154,0.0064323433,0.00007115122,0.0000037310483,0.000018096964,0.0011857689,0.000045630284,0.00008431659,0.0002377743,0.9919001,0.000012105371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9051451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09485489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022834027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056223873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22817606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793498934","doi":"","title":"The criminal code of Canada and the Canada evidence act as amended to date, with commentaries, annotations, forms, etc. [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Law; Programming language; Criminal law; Computer science; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.029159631694286002,"score_gpt":0.2848574269710231,"score_spread":0.25569779527673714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793498934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026849785,0.017084153,0.0038640872,0.092838414,0.014322021,0.0008795032,0.062210944,0.0014157629,0.80470014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024090169,0.012233244,0.007720295,0.02966538,0.0009987958,0.00047081278,0.020967837,0.00079758296,0.9030559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98339635,0.0007154956,0.00058103685,0.0004908611,0.012587098,0.0022291937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641749,0.0016730161,0.00063997775,0.00073678687,0.031386767,0.0013886068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004276592,0.0009804416,0.0008804276,0.0060256943,0.011479955,0.0071699983,0.0031429539,0.004590278,0.039980073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025315417,0.00075322366,0.0009273651,0.009663291,0.003321517,0.002624612,0.001579248,0.006389519,0.018824875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008211508,0.000005100684,0.00018379037,0.000059889422,0.0000026982782,0.00002176677,0.00021083128,0.000036074343,0.000053042135,0.015716447,0.97622824,0.007473902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003160367,0.0000029468201,0.0019697512,0.00014873451,0.0000066914095,0.000022334969,0.0003212307,0.000043596203,0.00009466258,0.0012677326,0.99608743,0.00003178744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98643947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06324925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06324925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2619917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4589076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793505393","doi":"","title":"The British Columbia statute citator (R.S.B.C. 1960 edition): a complete annotating service for R.S.B.C. 1960.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Service (business); Political science; Law; History; Business","score_opus":0.028724359923567637,"score_gpt":0.2602599907223003,"score_spread":0.23153563079873268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793505393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001165791,0.008456123,0.009012925,0.008914508,0.0060246806,0.0004069,0.3274421,0.0073896684,0.6311873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057140826,0.009364045,0.016570132,0.0022177421,0.000503015,0.00038036308,0.12907818,0.005356452,0.83081603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971143,0.0001443365,0.00015025292,0.00025606604,0.002084356,0.0002507273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897691,0.00060811953,0.00024292126,0.00073312264,0.008260625,0.000386185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021124773,0.0013360439,0.0014224891,0.012185026,0.007326828,0.0055995095,0.0022244724,0.0017891668,0.22174102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008940549,0.0011060559,0.00089395395,0.02586143,0.0018614366,0.0030269627,0.0020574469,0.003014647,0.21228719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061581018,0.0000018108567,0.00008401188,0.000119770375,0.0000015706012,0.0000180125,0.00007447392,0.000024457338,0.00015421647,0.0015205386,0.97951585,0.018479193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018428426,9.738401e-7,0.0011772123,0.0001376336,0.000004250907,0.000028581308,0.00009069582,0.000039605296,0.00021976994,0.00060188223,0.997681,0.000016526723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90954304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9501919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22174102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021248505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059996027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7417976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793603297","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: reflections on the Charter after twenty years","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027833930131516072,"score_gpt":0.2732450616857849,"score_spread":0.2454111315542688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793603297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022565364,0.043585245,0.0008763228,0.85981107,0.0110010095,0.00005283992,0.0005679051,0.000052837506,0.08179624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13459447,0.052439947,0.0047477223,0.4953843,0.0063436334,0.00018809292,0.00061653415,0.0005032394,0.30518207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848141,0.0019480627,0.000437922,0.0012153079,0.00768466,0.003899977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803413,0.0044986783,0.00041248402,0.000515104,0.0105171045,0.0037153068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014479957,0.0011145752,0.0011847578,0.0029191982,0.029584324,0.022786226,0.004606967,0.02049043,0.013339418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02761893,0.00096432574,0.0008370956,0.0073214266,0.03662632,0.014097162,0.0053799115,0.027723555,0.0015457636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014104429,0.000010110944,0.00020902835,0.000058334866,0.000004092943,0.000051902316,0.0064972946,0.00006821071,0.000050309714,0.20802787,0.7729391,0.012069699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007658151,0.0000031468398,0.00092886825,0.00021750409,0.000006206203,0.00001852143,0.0057036416,0.000034313074,0.000057827303,0.009264408,0.98370576,0.000052170522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18497188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18497188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37398815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9453171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793707576","doi":"","title":"A guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016120359640493465,"score_gpt":0.2644842084453889,"score_spread":0.24836384880489543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793707576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006833008,0.041576732,0.0041839425,0.026233714,0.0034636157,0.00033075118,0.008908493,0.00055643555,0.914063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008129286,0.035364937,0.013536134,0.0076176743,0.00054460746,0.00023412824,0.004299144,0.00041478538,0.92985934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975903,0.00018113878,0.00009567937,0.00013585336,0.00161617,0.00038078826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725974,0.00034305637,0.000045814366,0.00010937326,0.0019875355,0.00025455403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015929594,0.001223754,0.0008041438,0.008817949,0.007926959,0.0072465716,0.0024675687,0.0031131655,0.08671304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046993177,0.0008206078,0.00061429304,0.012463215,0.004378934,0.0035718933,0.0014365386,0.0045548338,0.02035403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003789296,0.000009271295,0.00009577323,0.00007055352,0.0000012496796,0.000038771537,0.00054673664,0.00007978272,0.000046975794,0.08507906,0.8722417,0.04178639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.680211e-7,0.0000011147008,0.0002983117,0.00010104163,8.978296e-7,0.00002022188,0.00018445948,0.000022249435,0.000016609794,0.002612674,0.9967333,0.000008235032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95532954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08671304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04797171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11493849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34806073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793729734","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code of Canada and the Canada Evidence Act as amended to date: with commentaries, annotations, forms, etc., etc. and an [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Law; Political science; Criminology; History; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.03142461581093048,"score_gpt":0.30064020858523743,"score_spread":0.26921559277430696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793729734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002455334,0.014268233,0.0031779718,0.102751814,0.013451869,0.0005735997,0.05052256,0.0013964585,0.81140214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02148383,0.010712628,0.006134055,0.027301874,0.0009827883,0.0003085728,0.016009707,0.00078822835,0.91627836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858488,0.00048026658,0.00047101238,0.0004002059,0.011000333,0.0017993884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664847,0.0015638046,0.00056492677,0.00069371075,0.02923358,0.0014592666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034758598,0.000933288,0.00083761377,0.005091106,0.0119746635,0.007933868,0.0029371837,0.0048321676,0.045628905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023104154,0.0007200694,0.00088157004,0.008972042,0.0034596713,0.0027414502,0.0015971222,0.006189287,0.024927368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006262113,0.000003999936,0.00015485131,0.00005218211,0.0000020664675,0.000019033716,0.00021403439,0.000028590763,0.000046199362,0.012022133,0.98018277,0.007267886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026229868,0.000002409326,0.0016452114,0.000119486154,0.00000574176,0.00001945861,0.0003435556,0.00003709081,0.000092797134,0.0010564763,0.9966473,0.000027851833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06692604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06692604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27367634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48558468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793731855","doi":"","title":"New directions in legal rights : proceedings of a conference held at the Faculty of Law, Dalhousie University, February 16, 1974","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.026744523261707023,"score_gpt":0.25477247203246983,"score_spread":0.22802794877076282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793731855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031163199,0.1126189,0.0011280235,0.6147258,0.035982963,0.00051514915,0.0032492036,0.00009183133,0.20052499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05039489,0.027098734,0.0008322428,0.022160036,0.00437905,0.00021922943,0.00048977614,0.00006704017,0.894359],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745315,0.00054231123,0.00010826527,0.00026634205,0.0008615594,0.00076822506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970624,0.0014612009,0.00009125984,0.00007919799,0.00058884063,0.00071711774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040772934,0.0010251929,0.000823321,0.0032464017,0.027371906,0.010454993,0.0021117819,0.009626353,0.021569703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006258626,0.0011457033,0.00081858895,0.0035691827,0.00878617,0.004255856,0.0037689623,0.010311614,0.001956338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013753091,0.000103466846,0.0007208066,0.0001391684,0.000021451091,0.00042606125,0.003417643,0.00024379484,0.00029180315,0.018771993,0.9623602,0.013366055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045532757,0.000021979286,0.0077017113,0.000230925,0.00004222895,0.000049044636,0.010382626,0.00017657071,0.0011873462,0.0029345076,0.9771503,0.000077205375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7629765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.947832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23702347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06222353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05906359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47683865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793776575","doi":"","title":"9. Police Investigation of Sexual Assault Complaints: How Far Have We Come Since Jane Doe?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Forensic engineering; Psychology; Engineering; History; Medical emergency; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.06652837737680233,"score_gpt":0.298888206144632,"score_spread":0.23235982876782968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793776575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005264853,0.19315526,0.0019304766,0.25440013,0.0121759325,0.0000808203,0.00019253531,0.0000933736,0.5327067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08211378,0.19842462,0.0027900792,0.09029128,0.007907207,0.00013469071,0.00042030902,0.0001888514,0.6177292],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990589,0.00034088342,0.00004812848,0.00008311924,0.000335887,0.00013318744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847454,0.0009232283,0.00009307195,0.000038548063,0.000400872,0.00006975056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001106164,0.00026018644,0.0002542805,0.0010927957,0.00297459,0.004269574,0.000710148,0.0026534873,0.007614948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033581387,0.00021489817,0.00021543301,0.00095346227,0.0029281836,0.004662329,0.001078132,0.0032225135,0.0033153978],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014344705,0.000033651584,0.0012791523,0.0004884673,0.000004601089,0.0003342155,0.013453275,0.000054564745,0.00021247454,0.14859474,0.6268553,0.20867524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010906872,0.0000107726355,0.0012728391,0.0008705679,0.000002128829,0.00027499825,0.0060663936,0.000026559976,0.00016447759,0.00526028,0.98604125,0.00000852106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014201295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031228147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014201295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027795765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034467538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028237224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793815299","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada, relating to criminal law, to procedure in criminal cases and to evidence: compiled [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Parliament; Law; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0524002021043856,"score_gpt":0.30988433615076555,"score_spread":0.25748413404637993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793815299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009355701,0.08661885,0.001505268,0.055697635,0.009364346,0.00039914055,0.094401404,0.0010231908,0.7416344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048110846,0.03129622,0.0028051531,0.009706289,0.0007198514,0.00014421048,0.017192446,0.00045233167,0.8895727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996635,0.0001346934,0.0001147542,0.00013369939,0.0024251037,0.00055670744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487925,0.0005612964,0.00018257661,0.000106468986,0.0038663896,0.00040406507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013035137,0.00075083505,0.0006226819,0.0059561883,0.008217078,0.004959696,0.0014694185,0.0019388378,0.024539392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077058785,0.00065615703,0.00044279278,0.00980796,0.0018558706,0.0011185495,0.0010127944,0.002159253,0.005806222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008517351,0.0000031697277,0.0002891183,0.00013777569,0.0000040008326,0.000026460577,0.00062297424,0.00005836327,0.000058937538,0.007575525,0.97638094,0.014834236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016987311,0.0000017362595,0.0055161887,0.00013692793,0.0000053057033,0.000020046788,0.00051900605,0.000031356252,0.00010787603,0.00039955534,0.99324554,0.00001479019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98426706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061750136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061750136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15357281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4480307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793830147","doi":"","title":"Accidental, incidental, fundamental: the impact of the Charter of Rights on Canada's legal and political culture","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Charter; Political science; Politics; Law; Political culture; Legal culture","score_opus":0.012635476544918103,"score_gpt":0.27473730986177547,"score_spread":0.2621018333168574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793830147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20098916,0.006171836,0.0010624239,0.20504759,0.00070228736,0.00004409037,0.00075152394,0.0000400291,0.585191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612766,0.0017933506,0.000331168,0.0069595263,0.00008567155,0.000017943146,0.000084443775,0.00005415669,0.029397145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99393904,0.0010205498,0.000074167205,0.000361977,0.0024195064,0.0021847812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914808,0.0032036414,0.0005241502,0.00025548378,0.0028136484,0.0017221974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002982904,0.00033135441,0.00036545444,0.0016350882,0.03030638,0.016108397,0.0022545776,0.003164124,0.01015731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015366547,0.00035324995,0.00031840635,0.003780485,0.03304179,0.004454072,0.0042599314,0.008105387,0.0003174334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055178658,0.000034235927,0.012397546,0.00007624886,0.000023751176,0.00028881014,0.11651219,0.0003491703,0.00021025297,0.7554714,0.08697974,0.02760145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037438374,0.00003188661,0.0954281,0.0006964859,0.00009433843,0.00018722331,0.2746795,0.0007623511,0.000658476,0.10363268,0.52358747,0.00020414876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12826584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12826584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26205996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793833437","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Criminal Recodification Task Force","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Task force; Task (project management); Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Geology; Public administration","score_opus":0.024611312275310823,"score_gpt":0.2766210391878722,"score_spread":0.25200972691256135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793833437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035254448,0.024107717,0.0012269581,0.17817241,0.031374756,0.0037343516,0.24165961,0.001526105,0.51467264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01527067,0.020426963,0.0035411518,0.058394518,0.0031956236,0.0022895872,0.087624185,0.00076327584,0.8084941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876823,0.0004365222,0.0010898911,0.0005276919,0.007962198,0.0023013242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9283338,0.0049860156,0.0019139095,0.0016249052,0.05604351,0.0070979875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009645082,0.0020683096,0.0019907278,0.013967533,0.012405404,0.0061505777,0.0091109285,0.0125421975,0.09606107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034903623,0.0025630277,0.0024898625,0.011205677,0.0029163223,0.0020181225,0.002999759,0.010489734,0.03545638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012422177,0.000015744008,0.00033599138,0.00007707131,0.0000042709544,0.000015133966,0.000028006732,0.000023285631,0.000010080375,0.0007722162,0.9917516,0.006954226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006870535,0.000012345886,0.01128824,0.0008270001,0.00006709573,0.00003537724,0.0002266644,0.000109552144,0.00009979994,0.0012171974,0.9859935,0.00005458441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98237765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09606107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036453675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29687446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32135636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793974233","doi":"","title":"In pursuit of justice : issues in Canadian law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02379990379892244,"score_gpt":0.29897189283703834,"score_spread":0.2751719890381159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793974233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002405623,0.106740505,0.00077945157,0.6235756,0.008743532,0.00007259172,0.0007708877,0.00008442425,0.25682732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19622372,0.23125157,0.0065501453,0.27809915,0.009635622,0.00029168476,0.0010045811,0.00039531486,0.27654833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98665094,0.001118081,0.00047953537,0.00071564276,0.007590504,0.0034453117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746532,0.0059925094,0.00053927413,0.00047973866,0.014321479,0.004013793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008556098,0.0011462861,0.0013709416,0.010176304,0.040782377,0.028452,0.0068714083,0.015902026,0.03030968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03836185,0.0010352865,0.0011238679,0.023284923,0.02648421,0.01100775,0.0049166256,0.014192887,0.0021238786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009568306,0.000015656855,0.00040431038,0.00026281047,0.000009304803,0.000079443096,0.0035541349,0.000107247106,0.000035108962,0.25923032,0.7071466,0.029145503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000844537,0.000004566114,0.0028416847,0.0008391437,0.00002769804,0.000058749203,0.007512282,0.00011286179,0.000038415368,0.03816236,0.95031834,0.000075498516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23973769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23973769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.51605487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88179654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794178963","doi":"","title":"The digest of Canadian criminal case law: comprising the reported cases on criminal law decided in any of the courts in [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07531184584852742,"score_gpt":0.32266360485561224,"score_spread":0.24735175900708484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794178963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003610927,0.02374459,0.0045697703,0.035620105,0.013664951,0.00092138315,0.31847116,0.0025253256,0.5968717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02364401,0.024812723,0.012439974,0.010212542,0.003388759,0.0004678608,0.22202079,0.0016016915,0.70141166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965779,0.00013500318,0.00016297918,0.0001627853,0.0026034627,0.00035784827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847782,0.0010934666,0.0005240452,0.0006741697,0.011812356,0.0011177225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024397667,0.0013492499,0.00084161997,0.020724038,0.0053476472,0.006136085,0.0024630304,0.0017879214,0.09747455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011382204,0.00079983275,0.0006605633,0.028543081,0.0022507152,0.003107284,0.0014995057,0.0017050244,0.041094694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060260454,0.0000042086394,0.00020815688,0.000116464595,0.0000017757019,0.00001639343,0.00015328397,0.00002773451,0.000087766995,0.0026095666,0.97877574,0.017992869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002022366,0.0000027923961,0.0042907344,0.00014350259,0.0000038821636,0.000055949473,0.00022754258,0.000037243382,0.000083188956,0.00085259933,0.9942848,0.000015656582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92688257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96802574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09747455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029904492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100078866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32608485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794189104","doi":"","title":"Entrapment in Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Restitution; Criminal justice; Criminology; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.03610771842042323,"score_gpt":0.3035160603853845,"score_spread":0.26740834196496127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794189104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035483424,0.024423312,0.002461156,0.06982924,0.0014051888,0.00011888221,0.0018976508,0.00016558591,0.8642155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6036462,0.026328966,0.0024168768,0.009800832,0.0006360746,0.0000986776,0.0010238908,0.00019069464,0.35585773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351865,0.0004108597,0.00015678444,0.0004861806,0.0033820418,0.0020454281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938519,0.001037635,0.0002704513,0.00032716806,0.0035549456,0.0009578643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022490646,0.0005984061,0.00064606534,0.00650897,0.025176296,0.014500969,0.0036910814,0.0035632013,0.025488008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012474876,0.0007470043,0.0006708909,0.011641857,0.010498277,0.004663792,0.004261967,0.0049969805,0.0013749229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018611661,0.000024176941,0.003678782,0.00014253007,0.000013093878,0.00023832195,0.008116892,0.0006923276,0.000060292525,0.6636456,0.25405982,0.0693096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010791046,0.0000136735525,0.029501753,0.0007137712,0.000047392205,0.00025139525,0.014873136,0.0013929164,0.00020468855,0.09777881,0.85508555,0.00012614441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15796591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15796591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25188908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97664016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794411980","doi":"","title":"Snow's Annotated Criminal code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snow; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Geography; Political science; Computer science; Meteorology; Criminal law; Law; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.035669955076311446,"score_gpt":0.28877912148614193,"score_spread":0.2531091664098305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794411980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065150247,0.0121436175,0.003147702,0.030967839,0.007596202,0.00051320036,0.14252809,0.0014917764,0.7950965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034282234,0.010963834,0.0048050187,0.006539603,0.0005127998,0.0002825797,0.032475565,0.0008568053,0.90928155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972038,0.00013767474,0.00012612184,0.00018458704,0.0017820514,0.0005657836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991667,0.00057307264,0.00019730188,0.00021918093,0.0069692745,0.0003742126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008692539,0.0009743497,0.0006580837,0.013587114,0.0119002,0.005740955,0.0017678711,0.0019833096,0.060457207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00801481,0.0007037551,0.0006324174,0.023726653,0.0021071255,0.0019384706,0.001182255,0.0021935313,0.012866127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069003554,0.0000038885673,0.0003605556,0.00006332675,0.0000020178547,0.0000390653,0.0003717948,0.000089391506,0.000030327848,0.016354026,0.9618871,0.02079166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016584016,0.0000016853371,0.0024133413,0.00012389386,0.0000037596296,0.000030199926,0.00048532622,0.00007279025,0.00006400785,0.0016378737,0.995148,0.000017491915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060457207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05471881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16710006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39701462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794426105","doi":"","title":"Newfoundland. Department of Justice.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03330978501612564,"score_gpt":0.3034568449634155,"score_spread":0.2701470599472899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794426105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052063476,0.0022636813,0.00020714161,0.016415665,0.0023063107,0.00012117856,0.09185405,0.00077582645,0.8855356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029888954,0.002171408,0.00033097639,0.0038374052,0.00014782493,0.000066126086,0.013442803,0.00030246927,0.9767121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998331,0.000106135034,0.000098553755,0.00019960076,0.0006585522,0.0006061229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962931,0.00029339115,0.00015568192,0.0002068403,0.002120037,0.0009309455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007750154,0.00096972426,0.0009883073,0.0028254031,0.0035236815,0.0030723582,0.0023030469,0.0027744805,0.71145004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035101923,0.00084492937,0.00045545134,0.0037597206,0.00082351407,0.0018405829,0.0024676297,0.0028851742,0.34501138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015980193,0.000019181956,0.00032410206,0.00005611167,0.0000038696085,0.000030081768,0.000016233374,0.000017833434,0.000016104712,0.0015396798,0.97866577,0.019295113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010600618,0.0000050573512,0.0028592574,0.0001364754,0.0000056965487,0.00002262593,0.00013893149,0.000040075276,0.00003877456,0.00033325833,0.9963971,0.000012078228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8236836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9160481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71145004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015937159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02236811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41158146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794783408","doi":"","title":"Toward a new General Part of the Criminal Code of Canada: details on reform options","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law and economics; Computer science; Criminal law; Sociology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.0694303143122252,"score_gpt":0.29164327381409877,"score_spread":0.22221295950187359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794783408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008263327,0.019750651,0.0047423635,0.32227722,0.006122472,0.0008354158,0.0062562944,0.000657811,0.6310944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05464504,0.012811311,0.012072651,0.102672026,0.0011183904,0.0003741673,0.0025436294,0.00037236948,0.8133904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944798,0.00033243216,0.00012157899,0.00027032394,0.0028857072,0.0019101602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99234104,0.0007756161,0.00013362373,0.00020539026,0.0052474635,0.0012967293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032684668,0.00074678083,0.00056453695,0.0038205925,0.012649288,0.011536667,0.0027692968,0.009566846,0.030945908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010774663,0.0007647102,0.0008945159,0.0050373008,0.0039809444,0.0047355327,0.0017251971,0.00716536,0.0041350774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009846,0.000030016865,0.0005379754,0.00007808461,0.0000056894755,0.00006638151,0.0008118977,0.00023420124,0.00021164452,0.18646768,0.7905406,0.021005811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001206749,0.0000104795,0.003485543,0.00014761878,0.000012849392,0.000031832256,0.001070795,0.0002320129,0.00018387316,0.008120308,0.98663914,0.0000535733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99020034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10757732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10757732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30529684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7805317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794799786","doi":"","title":"The principles of Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06429185903477523,"score_gpt":0.3009383358003623,"score_spread":0.23664647676558703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794799786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006482928,0.014976098,0.0026223978,0.04041764,0.002002684,0.00013087354,0.0011112299,0.00011774401,0.937973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058309194,0.029483616,0.010497174,0.014678987,0.0012616006,0.00033506745,0.0008825578,0.00018696413,0.88436484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469525,0.00051428337,0.00016264863,0.0003641227,0.0034242247,0.00083941687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610126,0.00041880965,0.00007774381,0.00019624432,0.0028047864,0.00040114095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026136902,0.0011534606,0.000694065,0.005434242,0.013752834,0.012489099,0.002505107,0.004423109,0.032246515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009231944,0.0009310241,0.0007158226,0.005899052,0.011605569,0.004008515,0.0019832265,0.0062855966,0.005119346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002771768,0.0000067240594,0.00015206863,0.000048512455,0.000002874697,0.000023791983,0.0008354672,0.00012421499,0.00001792197,0.6804571,0.30230784,0.01602071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023799084,0.0000016413392,0.00048772304,0.00013983744,0.000004027558,0.000020454565,0.00038651362,0.00008278634,0.000018161549,0.043745,0.95509684,0.000014510573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98087054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089285776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089285776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21680741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64781666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794915509","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05326525378524356,"score_gpt":0.3151482237126901,"score_spread":0.26188296992744653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794915509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019111325,0.008163739,0.00023175385,0.019293796,0.002544506,0.00027650438,0.021674369,0.00029701702,0.9456072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016799318,0.009918183,0.00076794357,0.005137682,0.0004907371,0.00015715863,0.009726247,0.00013127265,0.95687145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955037,0.00014561068,0.00012611375,0.00032165047,0.0026584042,0.001244424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417204,0.00031943922,0.00012956458,0.00023397389,0.004129989,0.0010150111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001393568,0.0013652296,0.000734195,0.010015178,0.014271513,0.007273653,0.0035268068,0.0037590547,0.1847778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008312633,0.0013412462,0.001205979,0.009719821,0.001817919,0.0018445712,0.0021154387,0.0033054594,0.030300306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035174446,0.0000070318742,0.0002765264,0.00003956167,0.0000018421963,0.00002826706,0.000082883584,0.000033593875,0.0000097931525,0.008111538,0.98003536,0.011370104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051633137,0.0000027111362,0.0039568595,0.00010293769,0.0000069566445,0.000049966657,0.00033398982,0.00006020477,0.000027709713,0.0011195998,0.99432015,0.000013759256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078365006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21577227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6181433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794975037","doi":"","title":"Note – “Between” a Rock and a Hard Place: Martin Marietta v. Vulcan and the Rise of the Backdoor Standstill","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backdoor; Geology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.019632331935467862,"score_gpt":0.2777221952549317,"score_spread":0.2580898633194638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794975037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038910564,0.004595578,0.002693636,0.4927107,0.0035741178,0.00009568594,0.0007583264,0.00008562096,0.45657572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5003497,0.0032416782,0.002968822,0.31337857,0.001765423,0.0001598595,0.00028494615,0.00010705912,0.1777439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689543,0.0006700227,0.00011358288,0.00054906687,0.0010054191,0.00076651305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755245,0.0015456125,0.0001521216,0.00008680218,0.000470101,0.00019299936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022013213,0.00037307543,0.00032614617,0.00092199474,0.016290568,0.0060510975,0.0019215187,0.01149535,0.008108824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053368886,0.0004567992,0.00055353204,0.00071615935,0.008241275,0.004778192,0.0026393486,0.011080298,0.0012703725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055168537,0.00003771047,0.0021572409,0.000079474215,0.000017350463,0.0009852268,0.02463756,0.00017347495,0.00067393243,0.59607637,0.3661149,0.0089915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003518766,0.00007428498,0.008932716,0.00049346103,0.000061468236,0.00086030405,0.040079538,0.00042572463,0.0023820542,0.06868083,0.8778124,0.00016200871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3995593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64065665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3995593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008769363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011673452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7944672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795072251","doi":"","title":"An abridgment of the Canadian criminal case law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.046727257032540964,"score_gpt":0.31729041890149745,"score_spread":0.27056316186895646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795072251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001498858,0.092199445,0.0027470458,0.5447504,0.0198493,0.00010414916,0.0013276859,0.00019128507,0.33733177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07630024,0.120477915,0.00991684,0.18553837,0.013843464,0.00018598969,0.0009856975,0.00050069764,0.5922509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927618,0.00078770705,0.00019475255,0.00047195316,0.004747169,0.0010365819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990591,0.0019294642,0.00013109136,0.00032452476,0.0060245236,0.0009994532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004870079,0.0010356564,0.00077816605,0.008347998,0.016208908,0.013385021,0.0037234027,0.0074163266,0.021818241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01627662,0.0009076742,0.0008858804,0.010627258,0.022814544,0.0079711145,0.002765779,0.009017986,0.002935933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000528557,0.0000076192823,0.00015616951,0.00006317459,0.0000023961193,0.00005054151,0.0008838725,0.00007509198,0.000029489767,0.20353445,0.7751536,0.020038432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027174601,0.0000017860535,0.0006022663,0.00014263611,0.0000030630977,0.000030311285,0.0006594932,0.00008013393,0.000017054634,0.016422607,0.98201835,0.00001949607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98521245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11419559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11419559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20025128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8285509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795170171","doi":"","title":"Common Canadian Criminal Code offences and procedures 2014","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); Psychology","score_opus":0.035624105976031155,"score_gpt":0.3052703561717316,"score_spread":0.26964625019570043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795170171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039187167,0.019399358,0.0014919821,0.026956039,0.007805586,0.000584404,0.16645943,0.0011823301,0.77220213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01569164,0.01063564,0.0021073744,0.006267498,0.00046895503,0.00024384023,0.034362536,0.00028283376,0.92993975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925573,0.00018999343,0.00030316366,0.000374312,0.0052429163,0.0013322368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534966,0.00065723335,0.00039735797,0.000367943,0.012100315,0.0011274298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023360203,0.0015252968,0.0010615861,0.014978233,0.010802744,0.0072723962,0.0044232113,0.004458508,0.10240346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013350167,0.0014399744,0.0016730506,0.01410259,0.0022063986,0.0018007314,0.0016537043,0.0043822285,0.024034632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007171233,0.000010346596,0.00036385475,0.00006738327,0.000004120544,0.000018390967,0.00008490048,0.00006682721,0.000016844406,0.006477042,0.97812647,0.01475675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060766392,0.000005678199,0.009631288,0.00021408292,0.000013385376,0.000040904597,0.0003533207,0.00008565085,0.00006424925,0.0015008334,0.9880482,0.00003635942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10664356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10664356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28262737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7737568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795254289","doi":"","title":"Towards a codification of Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0637236969040211,"score_gpt":0.3122696101341357,"score_spread":0.24854591323011457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795254289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007931049,0.016607584,0.13887411,0.12403552,0.002621719,0.0008341661,0.008681965,0.0019098748,0.69850403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19832565,0.024408594,0.5425072,0.013914443,0.0010387928,0.00072808954,0.010921196,0.001294435,0.20686169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213284,0.0010954225,0.0007130389,0.00065265264,0.00462951,0.00077654794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699868,0.00344867,0.0006379854,0.0023274417,0.022510443,0.0010886851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008580572,0.0011884606,0.0009834756,0.0174546,0.011364939,0.02498683,0.0054206415,0.0028014986,0.013233421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02991332,0.0013049857,0.0012070639,0.019920407,0.013048371,0.009719334,0.0040663336,0.005402681,0.002156879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060257125,0.000011077508,0.00061872683,0.00015712762,0.000011391028,0.00006453408,0.0028836941,0.0008242145,0.00014113066,0.8150385,0.11979349,0.06045008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004163787,0.0000036357847,0.0027945882,0.0008290683,0.000027708498,0.00008429595,0.003374236,0.0021451989,0.00032641419,0.13995343,0.8504003,0.000057010464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12166371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12166371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25467303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88273615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795258406","doi":"10.29173/alr1445","title":"Getting Away with Murder: the Canadian Criminal Justice System by David M. Paciocco (Toronto: Irwin Law, 1999)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0193489653874117,"score_gpt":0.29558439819127197,"score_spread":0.27623543280386026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795258406","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012002969,0.5885929,0.00025909595,0.336848,0.0065125627,0.00008261941,0.00045065215,0.000048189173,0.06600561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041371066,0.6793228,0.0012198555,0.090946,0.0040480467,0.000115016184,0.0005253195,0.00009435906,0.18235755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976931,0.0002886557,0.000066940614,0.00016999514,0.0013113007,0.00047000052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969854,0.00038046882,0.00010946681,0.000048844704,0.0017728821,0.0007029162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002613315,0.0010211227,0.00044917432,0.00349329,0.015130444,0.0075559355,0.002244153,0.006699321,0.010315458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004571331,0.00084726664,0.0003832768,0.0054754275,0.005932669,0.0036330565,0.0022310705,0.0055577126,0.002095811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049660093,0.0000070721912,0.00047182353,0.0001412411,0.0000046284545,0.00007561295,0.0009177534,0.00007733862,0.000023136823,0.007415489,0.96666014,0.02420091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008478928,0.000008144539,0.006573298,0.0009572491,0.000016795968,0.0001259073,0.003244827,0.00007095131,0.000033302225,0.0023137236,0.98661,0.0000373937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06265986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06265986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11530275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4546312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795312601","doi":"","title":"All about law : exploring the Canadian legal system, third edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.046232001581840515,"score_gpt":0.26050587964386873,"score_spread":0.21427387806202822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795312601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020982295,0.35454443,0.0015975538,0.05954012,0.0040282374,0.0000932473,0.0070303637,0.0003327352,0.57073504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041394673,0.32744518,0.0051784213,0.0112937745,0.0013967145,0.00013278046,0.004697431,0.00037480553,0.60808617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988049,0.00004816197,0.00003240619,0.00006833938,0.00085552636,0.00019064876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.00018276296,0.000046384204,0.000038186896,0.0009058064,0.00019780885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007788219,0.0010473261,0.0005053944,0.0066386787,0.007834251,0.008987105,0.0024493693,0.0024205695,0.06443071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033663649,0.00069934555,0.00047079925,0.014712064,0.004672896,0.0056013796,0.0012698772,0.0021290742,0.0070366096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004476653,0.000008383789,0.0004333339,0.00028240876,0.000003984839,0.000064446875,0.0018347409,0.00014645809,0.00007498231,0.043937262,0.89479566,0.058414012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011694727,0.0000013230799,0.0019313692,0.00026756278,0.0000037842779,0.00004337664,0.0014736627,0.000044138324,0.000024631896,0.0043989946,0.9918007,0.000009305715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07186925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07186925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15292019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5214503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795692973","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal cases: selected highlights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0351658351896131,"score_gpt":0.2931825906930289,"score_spread":0.2580167555034158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795692973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001550435,0.4796966,0.00033202124,0.116351165,0.034919485,0.0003706809,0.009149046,0.00023431833,0.35739625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010165368,0.68731385,0.00063745247,0.022891942,0.023937203,0.00019883757,0.005710592,0.00012104181,0.24902363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829334,0.00008312028,0.00008219649,0.000113576745,0.0009898006,0.00043797487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951137,0.0004266996,0.00021351133,0.00007096417,0.0031976555,0.0009774137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001597243,0.0016996387,0.00084613543,0.017154168,0.0043803146,0.006173086,0.002904732,0.0041292044,0.05274067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049173795,0.00086596486,0.0009287131,0.031218337,0.0022304675,0.002641673,0.0022160702,0.0021394438,0.007966874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004108293,0.0000070336814,0.00010645584,0.00026685518,0.0000021087005,0.00003746086,0.0000450667,0.000027710004,0.000012585471,0.0009956982,0.9784939,0.020001017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047789176,0.0000029024463,0.0027700623,0.00068889663,0.000007707785,0.00010669737,0.00028750653,0.0000150561655,0.00001215351,0.000442615,0.9956489,0.00001263418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92433536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07566464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050873835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077129275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3691172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796252764","doi":"10.11575/prism/34190","title":"The Abuse of Criminal Record Checks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.020058997699264135,"score_gpt":0.251745915074539,"score_spread":0.23168691737527483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796252764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081044175,0.02916503,0.023978582,0.302624,0.010781575,0.0005618067,0.0015398446,0.0008843313,0.5494207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6198405,0.011465293,0.006251545,0.2509547,0.0029570144,0.0004324516,0.00057446124,0.0004473487,0.10707666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9038062,0.028425692,0.0077913804,0.013978245,0.036102872,0.009895579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80574864,0.09412602,0.019005632,0.026591858,0.046419945,0.008107805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0559364,0.0011584294,0.0011802849,0.0060006767,0.019582568,0.012986317,0.0060327244,0.0152853755,0.006486745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16124406,0.002372307,0.0015332878,0.004734526,0.03194048,0.008277862,0.010027558,0.023530379,0.0022856905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012759397,0.000055724562,0.019020779,0.00043693665,0.00014959645,0.0028602968,0.028287606,0.0003730185,0.0008465095,0.58625746,0.24564065,0.11594385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043280867,0.00010988466,0.014756883,0.0025770746,0.000189874,0.0033922496,0.0062494106,0.0009027939,0.0020785579,0.027803794,0.94157845,0.0003177501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26915428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31627497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26915428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027491884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03886071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53517526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796758370","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n2p16","title":"The Credit Card and the Crimes Associated with It","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credit card; Credit card fraud; Card security code; Chargeback; Legislature; Credit card interest; Liability; Computer security; Business; Criminal liability; Political science; Computer science; Criminal law; Law; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.030946850836978335,"score_gpt":0.32203123777876624,"score_spread":0.2910843869417879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796758370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7376884,0.014772846,0.00088671217,0.015925966,0.00024656372,0.000029745808,0.0004910678,0.000006839501,0.22995178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914675,0.0029630433,0.0001246005,0.00037420794,0.000093320756,0.0000052139108,0.00009821252,0.0000029549396,0.0048709107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982857,0.0007445011,0.00008276014,0.00014793604,0.00041373522,0.00032538435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938896,0.0019981086,0.0026738106,0.00025756157,0.0005610101,0.0006200214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005843093,0.0001672051,0.00015032066,0.0023169266,0.0015372392,0.003230841,0.000295129,0.0009707568,0.008543874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007541489,0.00007101669,0.00012213126,0.002956123,0.0042685056,0.0020759138,0.0014300805,0.0013409965,0.00052684953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022528123,0.00032410905,0.3741906,0.0002321201,0.00006666932,0.001414062,0.012182466,0.0003616096,0.00025189263,0.5258751,0.0140043115,0.07087176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025209925,0.00014676344,0.7383729,0.0008982765,0.00006474089,0.0026906992,0.027787812,0.00057519093,0.00038950422,0.050527375,0.17846051,0.00006100235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014113296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012291509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014113296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019677775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013079447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028582096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796979865","doi":"10.29173/alr1356","title":"The Rest of the Story of R. v. Stinchcombe: A Case Study in Disclosure Issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Law; Duty; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Political science; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Computer science","score_opus":0.07175251714409084,"score_gpt":0.37182720912482137,"score_spread":0.30007469198073056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796979865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10510837,0.046572175,0.0027983426,0.5797367,0.0018729116,0.00013479497,0.00012433431,0.000034909066,0.26361752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6947059,0.0315143,0.0026905038,0.19331089,0.0013954603,0.00015739254,0.000060389728,0.000051621075,0.076113544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522334,0.002209268,0.00012907894,0.00037983604,0.0010621146,0.000996422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475807,0.0043124007,0.0002732433,0.00008944632,0.00027282382,0.00029397348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005447404,0.00036720952,0.0006113004,0.0011372041,0.019135723,0.007261691,0.0014955691,0.019616013,0.0025991783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131035745,0.00049314176,0.00066627003,0.002218939,0.013064592,0.0052370154,0.0022857753,0.016487487,0.0003643783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090079,0.0000881519,0.0027020993,0.00019577844,0.000014693833,0.022096345,0.06874728,0.0002406798,0.0003754892,0.7570728,0.12643002,0.021985713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003588708,0.00014528599,0.0040849997,0.0013270334,0.000050861654,0.016156303,0.07585342,0.00047282275,0.0011566238,0.08505751,0.81553894,0.000120364675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08014954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12013734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91985047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074683307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075545516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15936601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799451503","doi":"","title":"Examining the Role of Courts in Canada's Policy-Making Process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Process management; Law; Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03627179171506214,"score_gpt":0.34450689808745605,"score_spread":0.30823510637239393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799451503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53235483,0.005222548,0.0026713035,0.21310432,0.0004331271,0.00040678243,0.0011495666,0.000066384484,0.24459115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98720515,0.0007219947,0.0009486314,0.004360767,0.00004418478,0.0000480784,0.00007892722,0.00001694691,0.006575413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96014583,0.011282912,0.00088955124,0.0017692527,0.010460914,0.0154515095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8726322,0.06703124,0.005732297,0.0016963126,0.037512876,0.015394986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027392866,0.00043656948,0.0007578701,0.005786561,0.026942804,0.025374211,0.004096996,0.007306332,0.008940633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12901092,0.00068620447,0.0007380121,0.006523241,0.01187763,0.004992184,0.0058342884,0.0071414127,0.00038778412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030776384,0.0002968312,0.13619636,0.00029346856,0.00032162314,0.0007696539,0.031489857,0.005926979,0.0005831087,0.72829574,0.043923333,0.051595233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004188689,0.0002715954,0.36644688,0.001996327,0.0010878708,0.0002093355,0.14869659,0.019151509,0.0027236496,0.17985834,0.27859434,0.0005447582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99261636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72613055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27386945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5355109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8422085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800268292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0001","title":"Reforming the bifurcated process under section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Principal (computer security); Political science; Process (computing); Criticism; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Relation (database); Business; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02897294672493908,"score_gpt":0.2765586495432078,"score_spread":0.24758570281826872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800268292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19020358,0.00406172,0.11441391,0.16508363,0.00178209,0.0058294446,0.0011397994,0.0007191594,0.5167667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113213,0.0019529788,0.097808525,0.021995028,0.00030204322,0.001002725,0.00043535684,0.000094152514,0.06508784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9380023,0.010813804,0.0036119947,0.006607271,0.031711828,0.009252819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270141,0.025339993,0.0036178934,0.006734683,0.032093562,0.0051996307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038479988,0.0005316201,0.0005764818,0.0041787303,0.011581915,0.0107286265,0.004255444,0.009971733,0.004607494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09183686,0.0010638204,0.00091602217,0.0035807157,0.0157057,0.005871369,0.0075323265,0.011691512,0.0013405891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049615093,0.000058144386,0.003150613,0.00006354757,0.000019476078,0.0003970546,0.0054050507,0.0019577262,0.0010239318,0.93948066,0.015838947,0.032555196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038304678,0.00028726662,0.020365179,0.0010866725,0.00015456193,0.00061703374,0.006933426,0.015859941,0.005361273,0.4363964,0.5119185,0.0006367049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7835121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84697175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21648788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06863821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36476612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49800742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801425793","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0114","title":"The need to justify and limit procedural innovation in national security litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Legitimacy; Plaintiff; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Procedural justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law; National security; Business; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.024272660860192585,"score_gpt":0.29378463912315755,"score_spread":0.26951197826296497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801425793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08101577,0.004083406,0.26237163,0.3764572,0.0015021702,0.0010479321,0.00009193715,0.00071369926,0.27271634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87085485,0.0011109816,0.08371419,0.03329447,0.0015052604,0.0010808993,0.000052950178,0.00018482326,0.008201496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.78330797,0.08465316,0.015821414,0.018890316,0.08552736,0.011799812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.512848,0.34675536,0.035084393,0.052528635,0.045406617,0.007377014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18169627,0.0007642822,0.0015496048,0.00383242,0.00905037,0.023685323,0.0067741163,0.029231038,0.0043609203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37028348,0.0012215595,0.0018342625,0.0017491106,0.059353154,0.028459186,0.013971855,0.025427705,0.0014837777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032508968,0.00008159794,0.0016973945,0.00014415637,0.00003444576,0.00009467323,0.002617402,0.0021019934,0.00073421764,0.968972,0.002782341,0.020707252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009077251,0.00016019588,0.0014910604,0.00085048244,0.000058164474,0.00017728128,0.0014968776,0.004918285,0.0019617241,0.94179714,0.046865497,0.00013248739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008063639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009043595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18169627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021131376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05288245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9609132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801470191","doi":"10.1163/18786561-00801001","title":"Accountability or Accounting? Elaboration of the Paris Agreement’s Implementation and Compliance Committee at cop 23","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Obligation; Compliance (psychology); Mandate; Political science; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Modalities; Politics; Accounting; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08577791533271274,"score_gpt":0.4124142641102893,"score_spread":0.3266363487775766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801470191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10074176,0.005341204,0.09908159,0.115365475,0.0042110556,0.0029672417,0.0010415104,0.0011941239,0.670056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8185687,0.0010552122,0.052476883,0.016497612,0.0013742895,0.0020335822,0.00040792878,0.0002775142,0.10730827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9222281,0.029293798,0.004310145,0.006340115,0.025849272,0.011978502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593894,0.01673589,0.0032565568,0.0039437306,0.014335807,0.0023386653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07825254,0.0011119611,0.0008936262,0.005813951,0.0114227105,0.021871084,0.0049861334,0.012974868,0.009520966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07935129,0.0011256546,0.0021713523,0.0029124967,0.017017273,0.009551258,0.01145042,0.013494506,0.0014641957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025375948,0.000038906765,0.0008996615,0.000072474555,0.000019631056,0.0003437271,0.004954816,0.0011791002,0.00023230507,0.9687234,0.011346895,0.012163705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012305073,0.0003489083,0.016683377,0.0010022006,0.000087693166,0.00031558902,0.0116005745,0.0052325996,0.004281935,0.20837131,0.7513403,0.0006124268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12278498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06349179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12278498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045217004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07710564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41384393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802150874","doi":"10.22145/flr.46.1.6","title":"The Survival of Reasonableness Review: Confirming the Boundaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Standard of review; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Proportionality (law); Political science; Substantive law; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.056110595003917504,"score_gpt":0.37315237777572585,"score_spread":0.31704178277180833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802150874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11219417,0.0127202235,0.08196475,0.51991326,0.0050086225,0.00029044866,0.00008630931,0.00023035567,0.26759186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95776546,0.0010821624,0.010457744,0.022035556,0.0009864473,0.00011016474,0.000025209494,0.000060700353,0.0074765147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.902535,0.06151546,0.0039698454,0.006933124,0.018599318,0.0064472416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5759746,0.28510565,0.023298025,0.032333553,0.074369565,0.008918583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12086005,0.00023088767,0.0011201442,0.002944806,0.01009669,0.016545355,0.002788653,0.0104937,0.0043647913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32423547,0.00060727034,0.00058198214,0.0013818665,0.050709862,0.020056207,0.008846139,0.014657,0.0008861653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044235174,0.000019263825,0.0011637391,0.000088332126,0.000010965286,0.00021420466,0.0053091124,0.0002944598,0.00018360674,0.9664285,0.006996209,0.01924748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005073968,0.00013922184,0.003149752,0.0012679388,0.000039228897,0.0002171542,0.004748062,0.0023040883,0.0012104274,0.8684575,0.11831676,0.000099070516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021215916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014983068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12086005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016122656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03538585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63917667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802823186","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Superior Court allows the enforcement of the letters rogatory issued by a US District Court to obtain evidence as regards an allegation of price-fixing of foam (Neuwirth / DeCosta)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.015181105933129246,"score_gpt":0.28090962042635015,"score_spread":0.2657285144932209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802823186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08488373,0.0016422138,0.0030340916,0.10408227,0.0034945232,0.0016470266,0.0040157097,0.0006074879,0.79659295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23352386,0.0012197441,0.0053578657,0.06299012,0.00059806666,0.0003261855,0.0010031685,0.00016035153,0.6948207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98212886,0.00069603743,0.0008329516,0.0010880555,0.009560732,0.005693429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98175585,0.004625251,0.0005378477,0.00093040644,0.010177023,0.0019734665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006326442,0.0009112713,0.0010855425,0.0039614066,0.035435405,0.009186416,0.004639934,0.020507406,0.022647494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029032536,0.0021799712,0.0021850325,0.0027064737,0.0061604436,0.0017807863,0.0035394079,0.012156992,0.0034636245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028607843,0.0002480631,0.016402218,0.0002576225,0.00019348213,0.005458349,0.006729092,0.00058751454,0.0064655305,0.24478202,0.68212944,0.0364607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016431796,0.00012252205,0.028312808,0.0003093935,0.0003198394,0.0006270422,0.0039217286,0.0013052153,0.004448178,0.006280402,0.9538808,0.00030784565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98029363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05303059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05303059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16527592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38476568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803031062","doi":"","title":"The limits of police deception in obtaining a confession from a suspect who is neither arrested nor detained : the Canadian Supreme Court leads the way","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Confession (law); Deception; Law; Supreme court; Interrogation; Power (physics); Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Self-incrimination; Criminal procedure; Political science; Sociology; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.13040775523057196,"score_gpt":0.37581766269111194,"score_spread":0.24540990746053998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803031062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14609955,0.033266466,0.007128856,0.35785314,0.001171414,0.00013020521,0.00023797849,0.0000613342,0.45405096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545905,0.0077331443,0.0025177235,0.020804903,0.00049296353,0.000061453145,0.00003455224,0.000035162488,0.013729625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97703075,0.0065398198,0.00080143893,0.0016601909,0.009547263,0.004420626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435635,0.035147354,0.0015650104,0.0024736642,0.01452563,0.0027248766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025430916,0.0005266131,0.00090748223,0.0026356117,0.026124509,0.021013653,0.0036465414,0.0103614405,0.002398866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06582975,0.0007615257,0.00059137767,0.002026822,0.054189734,0.009191097,0.0054696016,0.014626017,0.00036430362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012839664,0.00003345104,0.004941496,0.00014260043,0.000053209664,0.0008937748,0.030948197,0.00082077674,0.0004726236,0.90316117,0.02278257,0.03562165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015099568,0.00018483693,0.029286545,0.005166367,0.0005169519,0.0010794112,0.08055354,0.0052871793,0.003033888,0.5569143,0.3169732,0.0008527486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93720794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95751995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06279206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05803546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10158436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42107874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803181336","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3264","title":"A Culture of Rights: Law, Literature, and Canada, by Benjamin Authers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.009691257091265358,"score_gpt":0.26827277857342174,"score_spread":0.2585815214821564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803181336","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018635676,0.47089022,0.00019508158,0.45106173,0.0062679728,0.000007717672,0.00007140134,0.000017984468,0.06962434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16156155,0.6034768,0.0009994989,0.06690792,0.016338995,0.00007772485,0.0001364336,0.00012815492,0.15037288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982949,0.00064531475,0.000072361516,0.00018154162,0.0006470174,0.00015892585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960588,0.0021444492,0.00023804477,0.00013758737,0.00081262446,0.00060845906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024901824,0.0006509186,0.00047109512,0.0040448797,0.0082276305,0.010792215,0.0010130184,0.0036525803,0.006918497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009493665,0.0004200988,0.0002408001,0.0043364465,0.015244419,0.013507347,0.0037449794,0.004286246,0.0014237887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024594605,0.00003460205,0.0006806647,0.00024448143,0.0000085875245,0.00013294816,0.012815104,0.000092666676,0.00007408408,0.2690825,0.66249776,0.054311994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006781091,0.0000058652554,0.0018477695,0.0018554099,0.0000053678978,0.00012518006,0.014273548,0.00009602026,0.000046301295,0.07817521,0.9035458,0.000016731583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14902139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2480604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012559033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014668264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29630798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803500806","doi":"","title":"Privacy and Insurance in Canada, England, and France – How Does the Responsible Insurer “Put Guidelines and Procedures in Place for Retaining and Destroying Personal Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Business; Internet privacy; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03319001248784729,"score_gpt":0.2990744582008913,"score_spread":0.265884445713044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803500806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5002334,0.038510222,0.001482722,0.21439978,0.00064176525,0.000078919984,0.0004102095,0.000046171986,0.24419686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731665,0.005650709,0.0004228774,0.008756668,0.00007220015,0.000018306435,0.00007977201,0.000019264477,0.01181367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98387444,0.00410452,0.0003591957,0.0010479436,0.0056140306,0.0049997787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851126,0.004954383,0.0012676271,0.0005772061,0.0050883396,0.002999871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748666,0.00026433083,0.0005262859,0.0025943753,0.024929473,0.014647438,0.0017891149,0.004557989,0.004061908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024867013,0.00039628835,0.00047044264,0.0039521023,0.030662498,0.006516418,0.004866833,0.0058960808,0.00022835727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011321391,0.00009437165,0.032854427,0.0002106157,0.000083040955,0.001306336,0.31599927,0.0004113443,0.00024597323,0.5495377,0.047190465,0.05195322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004903055,0.00007240319,0.104067996,0.0018774775,0.0001164675,0.00065100816,0.3250857,0.0006874919,0.0005962353,0.02408305,0.5424824,0.00023076404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99368215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14116211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14116211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14213128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804053906","doi":"","title":"La Contribution du Juge Lebel au Droit Judiciaire et à la Tradition Civiliste (The Contribution of Justice LeBel to Procedural Law and the Civilian Legal Tradition)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Common law; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008944032260718632,"score_gpt":0.2681750354249182,"score_spread":0.25923100316419956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804053906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33005962,0.015276956,0.019201249,0.046239965,0.0006016528,0.00017164249,0.00032142558,0.000081317456,0.58804613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614,0.001834211,0.0024940607,0.0016402656,0.00010980744,0.00004625101,0.000038805738,0.000039166644,0.03239742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344045,0.0036151274,0.00009438609,0.00061396265,0.0012034444,0.001032641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915318,0.0051134364,0.0005510361,0.00048115719,0.0017505547,0.00057203684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072424016,0.00040174252,0.00034906736,0.0036510725,0.010802626,0.011170981,0.0011403462,0.0020871786,0.008729678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011332971,0.00029482553,0.0002977483,0.003184287,0.026150506,0.003011729,0.003669736,0.0027276468,0.00042883446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004783154,0.000025104693,0.010987545,0.00016578076,0.000025306974,0.00040912232,0.06663443,0.0005132065,0.0003010543,0.85991514,0.008071631,0.05290386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032288357,0.0001313374,0.10171472,0.0019182084,0.00014427012,0.00057187036,0.10591395,0.0038420318,0.0015639002,0.23513582,0.548853,0.00017865309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.697009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79728305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30299097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04105953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029263841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6095507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280588165","doi":"","title":"Changer les lois, les idées, les pratiques: Réflexions sur l'échec de la réforme de la détermination de la peine (Changing Laws, Ideas and Practices: An Essay on the (Failed) Sentencing Reform)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.026759228871104834,"score_gpt":0.36418160204272637,"score_spread":0.33742237317162155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280588165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06839346,0.033576842,0.015910666,0.37356383,0.0011020037,0.00007724364,0.000081930324,0.00008298761,0.50721097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323076,0.0045759394,0.0017923559,0.0075955945,0.00055888906,0.00007550192,0.000022925446,0.000041025298,0.05303022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924476,0.0043757046,0.0001801689,0.00059454865,0.0014035016,0.0009984276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964509,0.0022207352,0.00027836458,0.00023932806,0.00062677794,0.0001839109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077441772,0.0003849352,0.000413538,0.0013449014,0.009045069,0.010302572,0.0011925907,0.006144894,0.003669509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009108669,0.00022873512,0.0003977559,0.0011688503,0.03847833,0.006986664,0.0033554477,0.008196247,0.00050330174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007068144,0.0000057127454,0.00017261357,0.000048896076,0.000002397519,0.0000934308,0.019572211,0.0001770344,0.00006358315,0.969829,0.0040958086,0.0059322966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030211953,0.00006645935,0.0032045678,0.0006286902,0.000020024223,0.00025789376,0.030056467,0.00089427736,0.0009638573,0.45052266,0.5133046,0.000050310944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053531736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04133816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053531736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022231346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01329387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16130048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806450971","doi":"","title":"Shifting the Balance of the Oakes Test from Minimal Impairment to Proportionality of Effects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Rationality; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015274970824091922,"score_gpt":0.3144726820540078,"score_spread":0.2991977112299159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806450971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03212834,0.0074798325,0.06835069,0.5165027,0.005160762,0.00030144196,0.0003802213,0.0002829321,0.3694132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72660196,0.0034846184,0.037100922,0.19755186,0.0043757474,0.00034355346,0.00016023788,0.00025053698,0.030130455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.903645,0.021966444,0.0066789193,0.012298474,0.05059786,0.004813293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9162048,0.054768723,0.0023573902,0.00544908,0.017899424,0.0033205748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06755471,0.00065642135,0.0016953609,0.0030327213,0.0052748797,0.014602874,0.006062683,0.010299693,0.004399701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12745652,0.00077556947,0.0017072319,0.0012893314,0.050315615,0.015983006,0.007822884,0.029162472,0.00094944553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023938857,0.000012154749,0.00029743745,0.000049052076,0.0000140239335,0.000056316738,0.00091732724,0.00009845905,0.00022744482,0.9809459,0.0073981723,0.009959706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013573686,0.00017410086,0.0025913916,0.0006556602,0.0000965417,0.0001815598,0.001987548,0.0012369488,0.001958829,0.8324552,0.1583452,0.00018126308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09313208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13174905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09313208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022311507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036703285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35726774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807580390","doi":"","title":"Robson Crim: Manitoba Law Journal Criminal Law Edition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09740531909828255,"score_gpt":0.3711384528234904,"score_spread":0.27373313372520786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807580390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049254657,0.010754011,0.0004922317,0.04734763,0.015530292,0.00027114898,0.0075244317,0.0011340153,0.91202074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031541262,0.0020553898,0.00023044938,0.0018428594,0.0007290238,0.000037741356,0.00075805257,0.00013899842,0.9910533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993144,0.000046109108,0.000040159586,0.0000611869,0.0004250483,0.000113099966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962381,0.00040613415,0.00014541685,0.00023687255,0.0023954103,0.00057808415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008267589,0.0010687796,0.0006155922,0.007013031,0.008319948,0.007702791,0.0018263462,0.0037078306,0.32061872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035894576,0.00095890736,0.00034837832,0.005849986,0.00142354,0.002314285,0.002274922,0.0029801372,0.091614574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007328622,0.000032144522,0.00045110457,0.000058346486,0.0000025634386,0.000070986775,0.00010793308,0.000027361604,0.00009885256,0.0028104386,0.9807535,0.015579584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004115177,0.0000055116125,0.0030271346,0.00012313644,0.000004886316,0.000047409263,0.0003704771,0.00006847179,0.000104790764,0.00070685963,0.9955285,0.000008578099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3751395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76312417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6248605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009662219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029367724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96905494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807640423","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Home","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05340679440478912,"score_gpt":0.3280323025176166,"score_spread":0.2746255081128275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807640423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006329205,0.0072077555,0.00071037584,0.020658087,0.0023390274,0.0005080126,0.032735415,0.0011051801,0.9284071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026997615,0.0034602948,0.0014512296,0.0024832024,0.0002995681,0.00021591944,0.00844853,0.0003580903,0.9562856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971662,0.00017898869,0.000094131436,0.00017025539,0.0013453054,0.0010451347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938737,0.0003360192,0.00009374246,0.0002001268,0.004126941,0.0013694804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030344462,0.00095632306,0.0005161138,0.004430033,0.010630246,0.008964626,0.0019852284,0.003663895,0.19072945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006276421,0.00048819164,0.00072708837,0.005977777,0.0022233138,0.002168704,0.0032328472,0.0026018352,0.018876756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042300675,0.00003546414,0.0016395835,0.00018593298,0.00000815795,0.00011301737,0.00057910493,0.00019108104,0.00010365095,0.046536207,0.91241914,0.038146436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013296111,0.0000067899978,0.006607238,0.00019872219,0.000005034132,0.00003586754,0.0007954743,0.00013108757,0.00012275492,0.0017938628,0.99026954,0.000020380361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98520976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19072945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07113376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24191116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6380536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807751550","doi":"","title":"LA METHODE D’INTERROGATOIRE « REID » ET LA METHODE POLICIERE D’ENQUETE « MR BIG » : LES ERREURS JUDICIAIRES ET L’ECART ENTRE LA VERITE ET LE MENSONGE","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Interrogation; Conviction; Prison; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08118404489453272,"score_gpt":0.3864088105546689,"score_spread":0.3052247656601362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807751550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038148098,0.05390107,0.78857857,0.040138405,0.0077426974,0.008463023,0.0019094504,0.0015536578,0.059565004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2025483,0.01396392,0.72194505,0.011169089,0.0017170276,0.008612615,0.00080803083,0.0009276407,0.038308352],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.65767276,0.2602182,0.017053554,0.012462011,0.049845625,0.0027478368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.670226,0.19847848,0.03453976,0.043059364,0.051814232,0.0018820958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15823185,0.0017513777,0.0023125252,0.0059715207,0.006272565,0.008366323,0.0052276934,0.0033107873,0.0074712154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33962113,0.0017269752,0.0018047797,0.0060917474,0.012163666,0.0054585626,0.007879048,0.0054084,0.0035558091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011897866,0.00015098006,0.024835058,0.007789901,0.0011070397,0.00066867255,0.0473728,0.0011172711,0.004682549,0.18619092,0.05255996,0.6723351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037701448,0.00073809864,0.04860283,0.0074175787,0.00093101495,0.002462796,0.016019564,0.0059649027,0.0129452925,0.06689662,0.8366575,0.0009866689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07372334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11363613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15823185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034059957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809064659","doi":"10.71781/1654","title":"Le contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois pénales a posteriori : essai comparé sur la protection des droits des justiciables en France et au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05752740831395392,"score_gpt":0.3500013565660056,"score_spread":0.2924739482520517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809064659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6188536,0.00572501,0.005126942,0.011937179,0.00009514282,0.000057501962,0.00068501855,0.000046217217,0.35747334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970044,0.001061539,0.00047765818,0.00035551417,0.00001989891,0.000017032422,0.00009687698,0.00001720866,0.027910382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973736,0.00035871266,0.000039699415,0.00023404314,0.0010409862,0.0009529614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973055,0.00061325496,0.00024628194,0.00016351212,0.0013043045,0.00036705803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00172768,0.00033776055,0.00039354217,0.001635163,0.004794737,0.0057420842,0.00082907436,0.0009772568,0.007063738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038293172,0.00017764093,0.00056158233,0.0015445071,0.005614552,0.0011459264,0.0023419634,0.0018446977,0.00020358375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014462658,0.00003125169,0.046925202,0.00012901907,0.0001745911,0.00027915864,0.024914045,0.0058036414,0.0014553791,0.8731051,0.004873312,0.04216467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007230535,0.00018478218,0.45665395,0.0011322882,0.0003387444,0.0002800694,0.045791883,0.005927732,0.0024168924,0.054302324,0.43264738,0.0002516934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92474276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9503412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95687956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043120448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04612279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31286216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809394529","doi":"10.7202/1048586ar","title":"Les biens et l’immatérialité en droit civil et en common law","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026840807377282613,"score_gpt":0.3184205012095705,"score_spread":0.2915796938322879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809394529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03348137,0.016950192,0.0269728,0.05874872,0.00072178873,0.000050389066,0.00023204826,0.00007445572,0.8627682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7219676,0.008849274,0.007981028,0.008942067,0.00069646025,0.00014746503,0.00018876414,0.00012742833,0.2510999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940123,0.0023903865,0.0001437347,0.00076842145,0.0017929532,0.0008921827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970675,0.0011065496,0.00031078127,0.00039103403,0.00076418684,0.00035992134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038198088,0.000800912,0.0006048163,0.00225035,0.0098174345,0.011972977,0.00158164,0.004209917,0.013686182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005354375,0.0004401898,0.0005740282,0.0028264094,0.040351838,0.00882568,0.0049279747,0.007913092,0.0017644798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027674507,0.0000025071197,0.00007096126,0.000011224093,0.0000018714011,0.00002328398,0.0018188132,0.000049352675,0.00004037694,0.9953082,0.0013491332,0.0013215884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010314515,0.000018213192,0.0013869721,0.00024651462,0.00001021051,0.00010947515,0.0049034897,0.00039796886,0.0002531693,0.6647336,0.32789645,0.000033638382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13336217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10606567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13336217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01673476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013799447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26517183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810134542","doi":"10.29173/alr1358","title":"Applications for Third-Party Records: The Realtionship of the O'Connor Procedure to Other Application Procedures","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Third party; Law; Production (economics); Record keeping; O'Connor; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.05719340708182324,"score_gpt":0.3521613584949219,"score_spread":0.2949679514130987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810134542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088630356,0.021792196,0.16906525,0.04498399,0.0018138862,0.0012467051,0.0001693892,0.00036955366,0.6719287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7981252,0.015442572,0.08306641,0.021748,0.0018896072,0.0015281284,0.00013610165,0.0003557272,0.0777081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90460503,0.056223504,0.0040283953,0.004185554,0.025846032,0.0051114587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7569242,0.2016893,0.014874204,0.012310867,0.013120801,0.0010807054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053989112,0.0005373097,0.00096652727,0.0062384205,0.008135371,0.0111447545,0.0026794944,0.006931978,0.00616372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19829306,0.0007518589,0.0015709448,0.0067439866,0.020839635,0.010780427,0.004338378,0.008511242,0.0015402649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060836635,0.000039230345,0.0018155159,0.00016923032,0.000015110602,0.00035755202,0.003048343,0.00027598665,0.00020098497,0.9510352,0.005249465,0.037732538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089430585,0.0005423715,0.01815155,0.0023966832,0.00019255208,0.0026217732,0.011178228,0.003578099,0.0042203935,0.5022658,0.4544777,0.00028539798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019191267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017874142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053989112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050175656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014861897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28552514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883672782","doi":"10.29173/alr2482","title":"The Prejudicial Effects of \"Reasonable Steps\" in Analysis of Mens Rea and Sexual Consent: Two Solutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Mens rea; Statutory law; Law; Plaintiff; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Statute; Excuse; Deliberation; Criminal law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04280125876061211,"score_gpt":0.36699413362238104,"score_spread":0.32419287486176895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883672782","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08204667,0.008505764,0.60717225,0.19478415,0.0032423583,0.00084620086,0.00014407326,0.00021923959,0.10303927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7990356,0.0022270232,0.16207114,0.021223212,0.0025285818,0.0020289407,0.000058379675,0.00018819903,0.010638927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8613018,0.09996297,0.0064303027,0.006569337,0.022888647,0.0028469018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73202753,0.2203886,0.013346196,0.022673946,0.00977177,0.0017918841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099512555,0.0014443574,0.0020470356,0.0046971994,0.0056188214,0.009566558,0.0036160802,0.011751289,0.0028999944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2049377,0.0015873512,0.002554731,0.002629655,0.08137735,0.020675002,0.017210696,0.023223085,0.00034244504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039320283,0.000025626903,0.00042149538,0.000046313562,0.00001509125,0.000088475186,0.0023663058,0.00061243284,0.00008355918,0.98872316,0.0006355466,0.006942743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048262023,0.000031871914,0.00040724175,0.00022149796,0.000023143655,0.00007975166,0.0011444971,0.002980145,0.00048124808,0.98862225,0.0059092017,0.000050856182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00463849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043064547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099512555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010301778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009702211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.526279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884898066","doi":"10.1007/s12207-018-9325-y","title":"Navigating the Legal System After a Motor Vehicle Collision","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Injury and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Action (physics); Legal psychology; Compensation (psychology); Class action; Settlement (finance); Remuneration; Legal action; Legal process; Business; Law; Personal injury; Function (biology); Court decision; Computer security; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04090566737379726,"score_gpt":0.39416272006527664,"score_spread":0.3532570526914794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884898066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98208,0.00012359838,0.0010502225,0.005830014,0.00007134113,0.00008762582,0.000091388996,0.000052914904,0.010613049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449843,0.00015820948,0.001910555,0.0004770342,0.000013586212,0.000022652705,0.00008706971,0.000007589269,0.0028248779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988262,0.0004780239,0.00007008631,0.0000849277,0.00015082398,0.00038985565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970739,0.0006455131,0.0007085891,0.0001496475,0.00048388512,0.00093836145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011594787,0.00022522107,0.0002248237,0.0014079161,0.00610025,0.0033835424,0.0013733492,0.0034035586,0.007074777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013723346,0.0002758829,0.00031145263,0.0006264458,0.001711806,0.0028671927,0.0024176317,0.0024552282,0.0007878514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009841615,0.0052937097,0.5379372,0.0001770716,0.00024691454,0.037903883,0.1590352,0.004348246,0.0033715423,0.011417731,0.026601879,0.2126824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001188221,0.00424984,0.29825816,0.00088564085,0.00016273552,0.011147118,0.5935542,0.0169442,0.0030225478,0.025094148,0.046235606,0.00032699053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02622832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08858524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02622832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013318628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046870247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052151263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885547096","doi":"","title":"Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; House of Commons; State (computer science); Law and economics; Commons; Public administration; Political science; Law; Economics; Parliament; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03544045504200584,"score_gpt":0.35412527795838145,"score_spread":0.3186848229163756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885547096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037840554,0.046688274,0.07086055,0.1671988,0.0039889454,0.00034165833,0.0003576003,0.00016386772,0.70661634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6144344,0.07147889,0.09468308,0.086625196,0.0076619126,0.0024708486,0.0006410315,0.00071565784,0.12128889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94644225,0.029203823,0.002584372,0.005389757,0.013638322,0.0027414837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94722056,0.03759817,0.002280799,0.0055491407,0.0062580225,0.0010932842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05439986,0.00094090577,0.001518422,0.008660256,0.0076336437,0.015259273,0.0037077973,0.01065025,0.013430707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086469665,0.0011227477,0.0011209714,0.008676646,0.06761131,0.021936148,0.006353222,0.013120789,0.0023795236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012879926,0.0000018275646,0.000027352271,0.000027418033,0.0000015379776,0.0000056005506,0.000182486,0.00005810606,0.0000027133888,0.9940725,0.0035600048,0.0020592578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010327136,0.000008574144,0.00017549878,0.00066349475,0.000007174824,0.000028612882,0.00043093367,0.0002861382,0.000039655326,0.80274075,0.19559391,0.000014894549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060397677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043673113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97033834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029661663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030415395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28769743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885549935","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v50i2.2026","title":"Cases of Mistaken Identity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07238438431476989,"score_gpt":0.3793907287514035,"score_spread":0.3070063444366336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885549935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52996504,0.0014355547,0.003199759,0.08678785,0.0015461253,0.0000957193,0.00016615106,0.000048786816,0.37675503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97813773,0.0002950071,0.0005310075,0.0063421954,0.00015984317,0.000018318726,0.0000291453,0.0000102323675,0.01447652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221545,0.0016074793,0.0003593067,0.0009821209,0.002113927,0.0027217336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892322,0.0048245145,0.0016154083,0.0016975289,0.0014137139,0.0012165516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039737304,0.00038359154,0.0005328041,0.0022762073,0.019979993,0.0058513726,0.0020246366,0.013173296,0.0062890197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03213523,0.0006062528,0.00057606655,0.002152065,0.015364669,0.0039698877,0.0071437564,0.013960829,0.0007119275],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017083903,0.00010720728,0.02415987,0.000049992563,0.00004628568,0.082001895,0.043298934,0.00035554607,0.00041572703,0.7889938,0.039931986,0.020467876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010866563,0.00012554768,0.03032496,0.0009438598,0.00021965406,0.1735895,0.085087925,0.0046040695,0.0037630738,0.3507387,0.35025385,0.00024023191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04339062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078433745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04339062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055824923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007175771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086276114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885640677","doi":"10.29173/alr1357","title":"The Frayed and Tarnished Silver Thread: Stinchcome and the Role of Crown Counsel in Alberta","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Charter; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.017170421928131153,"score_gpt":0.2755454357642354,"score_spread":0.25837501383610423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885640677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19550398,0.056239583,0.00084486965,0.19602892,0.0010591882,0.000077716286,0.000117938114,0.000050621038,0.5500772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849196,0.017978802,0.0006850105,0.027390389,0.00017889534,0.000017006267,0.000054076583,0.000019583933,0.10448023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969805,0.0005940302,0.00005543678,0.00017449107,0.0012513155,0.00094423397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563736,0.001894872,0.00020942332,0.000089182904,0.0012274849,0.00094170106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002669369,0.00013921781,0.00024798527,0.0016891991,0.012780288,0.006275288,0.0017446205,0.0041449484,0.004673267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064671715,0.00028100878,0.00014590987,0.0017315033,0.008057131,0.0012647737,0.0021971317,0.002789096,0.0002393119],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011397284,0.00012002645,0.020591296,0.00032358462,0.000025550162,0.0026556263,0.02827171,0.00096666673,0.00074289227,0.6358833,0.18071854,0.12958682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055444463,0.00010325094,0.09217247,0.0012394604,0.00012483657,0.0008652461,0.0666316,0.0011633248,0.0011019773,0.051902194,0.78445655,0.00018364792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039988264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039988264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08235036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29013652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885956722","doi":"","title":"The Metis and \"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms\"","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Charter; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01032829162902723,"score_gpt":0.252300894622472,"score_spread":0.24197260299344478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885956722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012921764,0.011081421,0.005347725,0.1801334,0.0025320416,0.00012530122,0.0014616577,0.00019470879,0.786202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5469809,0.008592387,0.015233739,0.026173897,0.00079910486,0.00020824654,0.00072903093,0.00028633903,0.40099633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932012,0.001370405,0.00021457131,0.0006764486,0.0029186832,0.0016187635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564314,0.0008099157,0.0001858932,0.0003121306,0.002444689,0.0006043353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004897347,0.0005815474,0.0005543135,0.0038263588,0.01751855,0.013164415,0.0020369512,0.004046134,0.012167166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013160042,0.00049501477,0.0004930684,0.004071058,0.01588819,0.0047917296,0.0033079656,0.0069226325,0.0006882875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006756606,0.000002215238,0.00018295778,0.000017241,0.0000016993843,0.000015837562,0.0013467162,0.000053866643,0.000025635418,0.9452919,0.046905875,0.0061492533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012396571,0.000007833167,0.0036292048,0.0002975024,0.00001593463,0.00004699143,0.005120902,0.00036808537,0.00018644161,0.10431898,0.8859242,0.000071481925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98356116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99102694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087322906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087322906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16427448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63357496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887056903","doi":"","title":"Vie Privee et \"Droit a L'oubli\": Que Fait le Canada?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Sociology; Humanities","score_opus":0.045413038349509056,"score_gpt":0.25905743631765304,"score_spread":0.213644397968144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887056903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0888004,0.018562978,0.0014093594,0.5323719,0.002773058,0.000048889997,0.0011956755,0.000072821014,0.3547651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69158554,0.011732729,0.0014434463,0.07544176,0.0005157266,0.000065192806,0.00027460023,0.00014808543,0.21879287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932672,0.00087807985,0.00015146076,0.0006109871,0.0024926297,0.0025997944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932366,0.0014261191,0.0005063836,0.00022163823,0.002911166,0.0016980771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032178648,0.00047744976,0.0007689074,0.0017074229,0.021946494,0.012256395,0.0018842608,0.0076887133,0.022542577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016645875,0.00048298368,0.0006376113,0.0027896357,0.011339475,0.006142576,0.0026015714,0.01175244,0.0012210076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013502326,0.00008023894,0.01795746,0.00027244928,0.00007311902,0.00076487026,0.017609369,0.00031823173,0.00050546805,0.74869573,0.1551767,0.058411345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049286158,0.000034713707,0.03758711,0.0013950522,0.000082962964,0.00045527055,0.048505675,0.00031970086,0.0007492382,0.031877752,0.8787425,0.00020072263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99086636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0841412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0841412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18651704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61048996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889040298","doi":"","title":"The difficult application of canadian criminal law in Nunavut","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications Doc Du Juriste","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.024395689549291666,"score_gpt":0.30194487752733923,"score_spread":0.27754918797804756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889040298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19135866,0.016127827,0.003358956,0.34306547,0.0021282234,0.0002758493,0.0008188663,0.00009656321,0.4427696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84728605,0.005191416,0.005261557,0.017822215,0.0002423387,0.00010705693,0.00010789545,0.00008818373,0.123893306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914466,0.001674188,0.00027171941,0.000891169,0.0025345036,0.0031818186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877802,0.004539095,0.00036877271,0.0003338721,0.005178836,0.0017991762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067568426,0.0004156156,0.0004876133,0.0041310675,0.047990356,0.01293566,0.0026458588,0.0055174134,0.0082404455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025974888,0.0009083205,0.000534793,0.004185687,0.013863708,0.002823112,0.004718416,0.00611585,0.00037661742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004741974,0.000023838027,0.007328495,0.00016895514,0.00003478237,0.0011013193,0.045776434,0.0010024892,0.0003399234,0.8009134,0.09931902,0.043943908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030765383,0.000026373187,0.034656525,0.0007406627,0.00008791918,0.000554498,0.08504857,0.002445685,0.0008742951,0.08135041,0.7938703,0.00031397765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99704367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99919564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1888556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1888556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25420552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9408125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890214374","doi":"","title":"Tranchemontagne and the Administration of Rights: Lessons from the Game of Jurisdiction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Administration (probate law); Human rights; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.0608751866163732,"score_gpt":0.29428738140437,"score_spread":0.2334121947879968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890214374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07270288,0.0022577234,0.08973434,0.06206674,0.0003097726,0.00015654274,0.000052472766,0.00005701093,0.77266264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746259,0.0005527716,0.0055544497,0.0027484356,0.00009328403,0.00010914905,0.000012465348,0.000040353043,0.01626327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98485166,0.008687,0.00029674522,0.0013106819,0.0024137585,0.0024399972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877044,0.0089156665,0.0005888073,0.0009932031,0.0010520958,0.0007459096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01364313,0.00049313705,0.0008928002,0.0012558844,0.012018862,0.0142988805,0.0030330473,0.009344216,0.009020645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02121104,0.00061994797,0.00094802724,0.0013834211,0.07236224,0.016848523,0.008372733,0.00955846,0.00055875705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038813923,0.000002865179,0.000073688316,0.000004644475,0.000001783661,0.00003608901,0.001278886,0.00020454302,0.000020662565,0.9975775,0.0002654142,0.0005301859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003679895,0.000014839023,0.00029659146,0.00006951645,0.000008116827,0.00006335953,0.00331711,0.0016405687,0.00013027576,0.95960534,0.03479586,0.00002163338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15761909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13157342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15761909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020034954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020806134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3134033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289046656","doi":"","title":"Is Discretion the Last Refuge of Scoundrels? A Comment on Criminal Lawyers' Assn v. Ontario (Ministry of Public Safety and Security)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Statute; Judicial discretion; Statutory law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03447309103902768,"score_gpt":0.2895659932702547,"score_spread":0.255092902231227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289046656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0153384525,0.007178424,0.0009149863,0.84173894,0.0029067583,0.000065860724,0.0004201986,0.00007264689,0.13136375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16706312,0.0038559688,0.00059933116,0.7340073,0.0026006799,0.00008414294,0.00009927584,0.00009347641,0.091596685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917767,0.00109628,0.00036202732,0.0013930701,0.003028786,0.0023431934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422014,0.0032232872,0.00036564408,0.00032688628,0.0011763524,0.000687791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068860273,0.00064044085,0.0010286022,0.00080092263,0.020610563,0.010301351,0.0049607293,0.029368954,0.0058521796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010581376,0.0011421803,0.0015620532,0.001397651,0.028612008,0.005101326,0.0027858976,0.020870822,0.0011296765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113375274,0.000028936887,0.0024748505,0.00021464228,0.000038146412,0.0019574284,0.029636288,0.0002044736,0.0012124473,0.4700297,0.48419753,0.009892267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008569378,0.000030207088,0.0047242693,0.0003898643,0.000060821527,0.00028331977,0.0098089995,0.00019004311,0.00045806434,0.024801813,0.95899856,0.00016836307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.932626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06737399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06431819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062069584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890655603","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2018.1467155","title":"The Process is the Punishment: Criminal Libel and Political Speech in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication Law and Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Punishment (psychology); Charter; Political science; Harassment; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.036144650582995236,"score_gpt":0.3686513146431431,"score_spread":0.33250666406014784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890655603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359762,0.004376368,0.00013562535,0.017741796,0.00015504494,0.000076815995,0.0011568005,0.000014579415,0.0403668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98954004,0.0028392025,0.00014072582,0.0014476675,0.00003403643,0.000019105037,0.0003800393,0.00001768016,0.005581335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938938,0.0006391414,0.00022053352,0.0003982707,0.0022744802,0.0025737963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832201,0.002846352,0.0021875445,0.00029675075,0.00737994,0.0040692184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028919054,0.00031614653,0.0007631661,0.005303364,0.02087823,0.0065492815,0.00271201,0.002055303,0.005338739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018299747,0.0005865551,0.0005184698,0.01153893,0.0059895236,0.001980843,0.0047110054,0.004307489,0.00034934984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039942822,0.00048243598,0.67374223,0.0003863717,0.00016783415,0.0025750406,0.16327228,0.0007552371,0.00041735492,0.045094132,0.037426095,0.075281546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054869506,0.00006505838,0.78177357,0.0005081802,0.00011742168,0.00047393786,0.16491486,0.0011360226,0.00026863662,0.0021336777,0.0483712,0.0001826052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1661377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1661377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28705525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9671621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890863487","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3238229","title":"The Ultimate Creation Story: The Confidential Informant as a Creation of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Law; Psychology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.013776674539029626,"score_gpt":0.32994792575610127,"score_spread":0.3161712512170716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890863487","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048369486,0.003663685,0.014580106,0.51471984,0.0034945859,0.00007546829,0.00026026656,0.00016994834,0.4146665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89456135,0.0017343597,0.003547835,0.028646622,0.0011898375,0.0000856469,0.00011872164,0.00024110047,0.069874376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838702,0.011660737,0.00022992062,0.0012909912,0.0018214264,0.0011267272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96001995,0.028288247,0.0017761731,0.004127108,0.002435679,0.0033528905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01918906,0.0006503165,0.0005181412,0.0018716964,0.02149651,0.02743801,0.002809882,0.0162693,0.01586027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0465426,0.0007607112,0.00050434197,0.001563161,0.053986944,0.03856803,0.014605379,0.018639466,0.002801465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040407613,0.000019465411,0.00053473585,0.000036215413,0.0000051823404,0.00051380583,0.056180328,0.000036352896,0.00008160912,0.9152612,0.022806922,0.0044837403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041187515,0.000056561694,0.00068765436,0.00036160822,0.00002639865,0.0013116087,0.08556745,0.00063666265,0.0011325178,0.4072404,0.50286734,0.000070581795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002964269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002531664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02743801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035775562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005841808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10148269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891052014","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198788478.003.0006","title":"Unfit to Stand Trial Canadian Law and Practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Political science; Disposition; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.059211813782948985,"score_gpt":0.29887481071117705,"score_spread":0.23966299692822807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891052014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005200603,0.019747173,0.0023097177,0.09396828,0.0019393921,0.00007810638,0.00023577674,0.000083267754,0.8764377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37457544,0.042920604,0.0057510654,0.052074347,0.0011030403,0.00013442956,0.00037754353,0.00023160686,0.5228319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98876125,0.00096289825,0.0002505138,0.0008523796,0.006831091,0.0023419145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919783,0.0015515542,0.00019483281,0.0003600144,0.0045926315,0.0013226526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006096594,0.00058979064,0.00050744525,0.0028323438,0.018975182,0.012477496,0.00271169,0.005818191,0.013216129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018784631,0.0006074023,0.0003856599,0.003741796,0.02267602,0.0032048358,0.0034520256,0.0075057065,0.0017346612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004154351,0.000010405978,0.000413205,0.000078313395,0.000002554666,0.00012097324,0.004442004,0.00018051537,0.00008173126,0.8243471,0.13319634,0.037122678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049985865,0.0000070315523,0.0014874302,0.00055045396,0.0000061135884,0.00010586181,0.0023436204,0.0001822581,0.000072293034,0.037991174,0.9572123,0.000036333684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97154266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11939586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11939586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24961929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8662816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891524381","doi":"10.29173/alr1361","title":"Charter Roadblocks to Defence Disclosure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Silence; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05359206156690044,"score_gpt":0.3294825560525907,"score_spread":0.27589049448569025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891524381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020410253,0.022519335,0.028169276,0.6017563,0.0030201867,0.00025345272,0.00027468146,0.00025217538,0.32334444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628938,0.019811228,0.026504753,0.13163877,0.003030907,0.00033281583,0.00026083036,0.00013619024,0.055390734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92358756,0.015898164,0.0034150828,0.0057912106,0.044196352,0.007111683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8983367,0.059181385,0.0046517034,0.0060602743,0.028575964,0.0031940883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057354968,0.0004595514,0.0009388863,0.0025685336,0.011365946,0.019201059,0.0048042526,0.016852086,0.004820416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1271447,0.0008655277,0.0009301995,0.002457625,0.032321125,0.009826895,0.0063929744,0.02395754,0.0011198806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004940879,0.0000062406225,0.00009814793,0.0000319129,0.0000017660883,0.000043362445,0.0006392879,0.00022432032,0.000050349834,0.98259497,0.008635195,0.0076695597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051074632,0.000049537706,0.001004715,0.0007181668,0.00002259877,0.0002470179,0.0017473779,0.0012034771,0.00062542537,0.47265702,0.5215407,0.00013293451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3905001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32822716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60949993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04434263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12621413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77645427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892157663","doi":"","title":"Taking One Step Forward, Preventing Two Steps Back: Applying Criminal Lawyers’ Association to Invalidate Extreme Legislative Restrictions on Access to Government Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Legislation; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.07750818150812522,"score_gpt":0.35504727522910645,"score_spread":0.27753909372098123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892157663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17648928,0.0040017036,0.035664305,0.40179908,0.0018348095,0.00036924196,0.00008307687,0.00035044513,0.37940803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111873,0.00086901576,0.008200646,0.14741437,0.00059223984,0.0002824063,0.00003365779,0.000064819076,0.031355567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484421,0.018186316,0.0024391708,0.0068274634,0.015061165,0.009043793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585424,0.03044306,0.002453827,0.0029517591,0.004050775,0.001558242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036188293,0.00057442364,0.00078530214,0.0022127945,0.02358384,0.020435115,0.0043711285,0.026702095,0.0019498513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06533446,0.0011267344,0.0013381745,0.0019056658,0.03568166,0.01196921,0.011856193,0.037954185,0.0005957332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015900652,0.000042989002,0.0016511956,0.00003418698,0.000016707452,0.00054316764,0.012101091,0.00028017545,0.00036326546,0.96308124,0.0123634115,0.009506829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029947693,0.00032173272,0.0054972265,0.001411437,0.00026198727,0.0011815107,0.023524012,0.0049399347,0.006197171,0.46772084,0.4882346,0.00041005024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10355359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13237838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10355359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015463531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04324405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20590168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894116523","doi":"","title":"Making the Mandela Rules: Evidence, Expertise, and Politics in the Development of Soft Law International Prison Standards","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Normative; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Soft law; Politics; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.056673119231982004,"score_gpt":0.3876219887162333,"score_spread":0.33094886948425134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894116523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41534197,0.011030621,0.016873896,0.14170434,0.0007240583,0.00034543878,0.000116766125,0.000047459685,0.41381544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98996454,0.0015944709,0.0023690353,0.0039407588,0.0000715963,0.000093869276,0.000022826644,0.000026173819,0.0019166551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90548474,0.06975933,0.0038193117,0.0039255917,0.01198778,0.0050233034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6788762,0.2889635,0.011038421,0.005356412,0.012916728,0.0028487253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12145134,0.00040430896,0.0005271271,0.0059634033,0.012228769,0.019025648,0.0030923088,0.005298665,0.0047695017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19804814,0.0008170377,0.00040420436,0.0044330307,0.052619122,0.028871242,0.01272647,0.011973203,0.0002879556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021280237,0.00005304362,0.006115785,0.00026136712,0.000010356077,0.0003642104,0.36435723,0.00018814349,0.00010552575,0.5976621,0.002780594,0.028080346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032192907,0.00008877108,0.01755508,0.0054873284,0.00004474473,0.00028493893,0.6624205,0.0010023797,0.0010664172,0.15135281,0.16052973,0.00013501201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018309448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02753273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12145134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016723637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015633864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64230376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894989073","doi":"10.4324/9780203597286-7","title":"Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice in Comparative Perspective: Preface and Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Extant taxon; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04080265859918631,"score_gpt":0.3686743012718951,"score_spread":0.3278716426727088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894989073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008159982,0.35619268,0.0135706775,0.082734354,0.081576556,0.0008066512,0.002948741,0.00022998986,0.45378035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12494229,0.47806302,0.014026607,0.040929295,0.12955274,0.0025837393,0.0054838867,0.0006930583,0.2037253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992003,0.00036059404,0.000063627,0.00012737534,0.00017150544,0.0000765981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942813,0.0044463314,0.00020570807,0.00014931636,0.0006311046,0.0002861773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022128073,0.0013018388,0.0012049077,0.004405236,0.0043957573,0.0050199134,0.0014606403,0.003175495,0.02126249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056035016,0.0006563219,0.0006805861,0.0062041664,0.003989852,0.0072946693,0.0025702238,0.0066498443,0.0035328919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007025328,0.00016589563,0.001083072,0.0014384007,0.000019735278,0.00056604244,0.009807839,0.0006526504,0.00035941985,0.34025386,0.5662588,0.079324014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008051769,0.00008354104,0.0037490854,0.0023686353,0.000006351337,0.00037984896,0.0033955937,0.00019556568,0.000097969096,0.049202133,0.9404721,0.00004112726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055239024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005319055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02126249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003981996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018608678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07113016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895749759","doi":"","title":"Location Tracking by Police: The Regulation of ‘Tireless and Absolute Surveillance’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Seriousness; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Tracking (education); Phone; Anonymity; License; Secrecy; Computer security; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03911756228731976,"score_gpt":0.3556573052824298,"score_spread":0.31653974299511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895749759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87283665,0.0007861164,0.01770726,0.005775103,0.00003869297,0.000078603654,0.00018814096,0.000055173557,0.102534175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985702,0.000104648636,0.00047929966,0.00016814534,0.000006776832,0.000016896956,0.000022321901,0.000003765815,0.00062792597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854204,0.0063204956,0.00061399606,0.001720595,0.004114394,0.001809995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742688,0.0074139056,0.010227584,0.0043638563,0.0031253682,0.00060053956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069509144,0.00015796136,0.00033565637,0.0025329804,0.0037027257,0.006257561,0.0012588282,0.0010905078,0.0013201577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02050909,0.00027653362,0.00038894665,0.003017575,0.018328102,0.0048262025,0.0052971365,0.0013858282,0.00013965499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019607772,0.00007756615,0.18693152,0.00022653419,0.00009818988,0.000578274,0.18641974,0.0029622978,0.0038723846,0.5420591,0.0027658695,0.073812515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045585726,0.00030573233,0.57010984,0.0007566847,0.00015837965,0.0011743593,0.19567043,0.006810383,0.0063667917,0.102567,0.115794756,0.00024006773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0825769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053918615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0825769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007715664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007905751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1641925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895755850","doi":"","title":"Regulating Unreliable Evidence: Can Evidence Rules Guide Juries and Prevent Wrongful Convictions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1058909358999378,"score_gpt":0.3692711919033421,"score_spread":0.2633802560034043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895755850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06792928,0.040705,0.22521171,0.4135617,0.0034786495,0.0020387974,0.00048199543,0.0013770283,0.24521586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8010707,0.014411379,0.13386258,0.037257366,0.0019028472,0.0010378419,0.00019589886,0.00025173207,0.010009692],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9300475,0.029267166,0.008047737,0.004716319,0.024322513,0.003598773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67068624,0.24069011,0.030475954,0.016997516,0.035492226,0.0056579267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10551611,0.00082030916,0.0014739113,0.0044648796,0.004001789,0.017136626,0.0054979105,0.011883955,0.0033942035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33689162,0.0010818456,0.0007703996,0.0018592161,0.013081664,0.012282215,0.005246675,0.007366383,0.0016055737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004564502,0.0004232921,0.019222924,0.0013329325,0.0002245346,0.00033393063,0.004914243,0.014599979,0.0017946168,0.44235346,0.056793917,0.45754963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038448206,0.00047023565,0.0199978,0.0048078,0.0003015819,0.00021178504,0.002707656,0.014163384,0.002498998,0.80900896,0.14503948,0.0004078572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020685976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03365939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10551611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077223433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021296728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5580292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895999949","doi":"10.29173/alr2496","title":"The Shopkeeper’s Privilege and Canadian Tort Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Privilege (computing); Jurisprudence; Corporation; Economic Justice; Political science; Liability; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03065830103122638,"score_gpt":0.32994579063932195,"score_spread":0.2992874896080956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895999949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0935821,0.14504342,0.0010075627,0.10092995,0.0009074591,0.00015885032,0.0011765927,0.000050875766,0.65714324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85437834,0.07690543,0.0011826258,0.019764962,0.00032771347,0.00004762542,0.00044905502,0.00003857608,0.04690561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935504,0.0004952288,0.00016840236,0.00043945483,0.0034667184,0.0018796434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882867,0.0027197106,0.0009322767,0.00025254738,0.0061444803,0.0016642327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003732759,0.00036423065,0.0005309112,0.006213279,0.012110353,0.0080557475,0.0022893744,0.0037950308,0.009965723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013098038,0.00046362975,0.0006524825,0.0059289755,0.011023964,0.0020673433,0.0023194773,0.0034879493,0.0004854572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007561434,0.00010117835,0.027537102,0.00100758,0.000078237004,0.0011215792,0.010057266,0.0006687025,0.00032353876,0.7363769,0.13625097,0.08640123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056979497,0.000069479844,0.14160413,0.0034375084,0.00023923787,0.00053363957,0.0112658525,0.00074102083,0.00033013598,0.036286484,0.8052675,0.00016798457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99390876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99724764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113577046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113577046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19725771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.824063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896023821","doi":"","title":"L’agent civil d’infiltration dans le cadre d’enquête au Québec : le portrait de son utilisation et de ses problématiques","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Portrait; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.013815500792014171,"score_gpt":0.2240008809335619,"score_spread":0.21018538014154775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896023821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3751457,0.0069364863,0.009583334,0.12956361,0.00074274343,0.00018983147,0.00051065045,0.00017659512,0.47715104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.851725,0.0014014534,0.0014800441,0.0030280184,0.00008322636,0.00005960395,0.000079054254,0.000070923816,0.14207262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376136,0.0019306046,0.00021455213,0.000555669,0.0018077261,0.0017300779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910122,0.00251951,0.00089938036,0.00045646544,0.0035931568,0.0015192728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005488452,0.0003466997,0.0004284359,0.002649243,0.022513596,0.011825329,0.0020189707,0.0035956744,0.014003423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012569191,0.0005801105,0.00037082733,0.0031673922,0.012916526,0.004213933,0.0039634537,0.0041678627,0.0012117606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008012997,0.000060919803,0.03395831,0.0001724696,0.00003655277,0.0011018801,0.40729296,0.0004192123,0.0006751202,0.42618206,0.061311077,0.06870927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014753328,0.000034064084,0.04391227,0.00055298716,0.000038913724,0.00033037743,0.18898612,0.001048299,0.0006104623,0.010576919,0.75381505,0.000079706544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9784638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054249566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054249566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065158114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896136361","doi":"","title":"Engagement with Human Rights by Administrative Decision-Makers: A Transformative Opportunity to Build a More Grassroots Human Rights Culture","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Human rights; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; International human rights law; Charter; Redress; Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.044220014575189266,"score_gpt":0.3883270531728037,"score_spread":0.34410703859761443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896136361","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030015588,0.004227152,0.023551311,0.7234555,0.0017907305,0.00016866604,0.000058719877,0.00016772017,0.21656461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84883744,0.0031054642,0.02136994,0.08781571,0.0009497098,0.00015508539,0.000080586404,0.0002729757,0.037413172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9195089,0.04649547,0.001175344,0.004618799,0.016466133,0.011735274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9124672,0.043622773,0.0030551287,0.007708485,0.012087406,0.021059059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09109652,0.0007867058,0.0011894573,0.003051397,0.043009177,0.06067049,0.0053003887,0.014209368,0.008242874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04233704,0.00086696766,0.0009963964,0.0028443497,0.15182012,0.020203892,0.026050558,0.027324393,0.0017277787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002212783,0.000097121985,0.0010436659,0.00007701291,0.000020977157,0.00034313247,0.11094678,0.00045627882,0.0005934834,0.83120877,0.032193184,0.022997463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038136448,0.00003386396,0.0013878411,0.00037297193,0.000013898894,0.000092717404,0.0825555,0.0006893561,0.00049134705,0.31746873,0.5967534,0.00010225279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29727793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3967173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29727793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08737942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19175373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63398504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896164668","doi":"10.29173/alr2494","title":"Consent Searches for Electronic Text Communications: Escaping the Zero-Sum Trap","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Dissenting opinion; Communication source; Supreme court; Adjudication; Law; Doctrine; Charter; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Internet privacy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.17285005703172263,"score_gpt":0.42596920399767624,"score_spread":0.2531191469659536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896164668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10264336,0.0027025377,0.33043605,0.08520495,0.00059929746,0.00034662802,0.00013728427,0.0008664685,0.4770634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9337057,0.00083833106,0.028934844,0.011307971,0.00036151905,0.0002935549,0.000060677175,0.00017203667,0.02432531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97045845,0.015642727,0.0009823844,0.002645387,0.008556831,0.0017141708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95731187,0.02977704,0.002979058,0.0059540034,0.003199541,0.0007784169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02013239,0.00071197597,0.0008359716,0.0014823377,0.004284093,0.008401692,0.0027372856,0.006674278,0.007412866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06850468,0.00065121026,0.0008920638,0.0010352421,0.01757891,0.014832304,0.009504078,0.008327962,0.0021998452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029524152,0.000020013422,0.0002909131,0.00004262984,0.000006542699,0.00017010355,0.002070072,0.0003643219,0.00046284666,0.9743953,0.0025933576,0.019554509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006258636,0.000058609203,0.00024329007,0.00015393623,0.000022841576,0.0002772586,0.00091610255,0.003069351,0.0017362683,0.9555404,0.037874084,0.00004526416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029858593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026619427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02013239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003206733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007505042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10647154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896576887","doi":"10.7939/r3z31p331","title":"Punting terrorists, assassins and other undesirables: Canada, the Human Rights Committee and requests for interim measures of protection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Human rights; Treaty; Law; Political science; Faith; International human rights law","score_opus":0.05500992013052437,"score_gpt":0.2500364854403857,"score_spread":0.19502656530986134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896576887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15173857,0.023074394,0.0034869679,0.30613258,0.0010589837,0.00016419546,0.0002750095,0.00007085516,0.5139984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006288,0.010089877,0.0018285632,0.048447255,0.00023718267,0.000046407367,0.00006182844,0.000034883167,0.03862525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98653513,0.0017777275,0.00034457858,0.0006209638,0.006357572,0.0043639606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98082775,0.010306194,0.0021789176,0.00041446774,0.00493323,0.0013394062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077718645,0.000430725,0.00052969856,0.0020674635,0.01868874,0.011713891,0.0025369532,0.008799169,0.0034439887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02899704,0.0005361297,0.0004919968,0.0023121818,0.02116307,0.003480317,0.0038860785,0.009995473,0.0002138596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057234756,0.00003186821,0.010704318,0.00025102653,0.000040451974,0.00075241167,0.024129331,0.00070731214,0.00025497406,0.89617497,0.03942247,0.027473757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013603362,0.000121266894,0.079436205,0.0025757656,0.00064180046,0.0008457369,0.1028069,0.0018802644,0.0025014365,0.11379495,0.6947979,0.00046182473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08355484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08355484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2335124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6062356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896922696","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Wills Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08282866817183414,"score_gpt":0.32400769154687636,"score_spread":0.2411790233750422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896922696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02427637,0.008740404,0.0006526642,0.057453066,0.0041402057,0.00095755595,0.009393262,0.00012284121,0.8942636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06568391,0.0037121694,0.001853966,0.024239296,0.00026215156,0.00063421536,0.0023093892,0.000095124,0.90120983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274915,0.00088866,0.0006804275,0.00085666095,0.002920169,0.0019049403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924217,0.0030728602,0.00049671734,0.00069638336,0.0023973375,0.0009149711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005158035,0.0010684401,0.00102041,0.0045577446,0.014149233,0.011947958,0.0038964325,0.009855234,0.03480817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017327875,0.0017756147,0.0010345608,0.004894926,0.0042076926,0.0033821755,0.0038425494,0.011605979,0.004587194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014676987,0.00012319663,0.010269306,0.00029458312,0.00008166753,0.0015916451,0.005061878,0.000608967,0.0006487192,0.3318232,0.6217919,0.027558291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007860267,0.00003334124,0.03500649,0.0006369121,0.00007948736,0.00022584855,0.004376661,0.00021240862,0.00088405283,0.008432957,0.9498598,0.00017337642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9280502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07194978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06731173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09663418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48838305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897396376","doi":"","title":"The Canada's Federal Court calls for tougher criminal sentences for infringing cartel criminal offences (Maxzone)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Law; Political science; Criminal court; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Federal court; Criminology; Business; Supreme court; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.039565808969672225,"score_gpt":0.30735111394980597,"score_spread":0.26778530498013375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897396376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05633503,0.006452886,0.0016305248,0.5772257,0.008021653,0.00043043878,0.0028744005,0.0006304289,0.3463989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19034304,0.00211584,0.0037029013,0.4832941,0.0011330602,0.00015795602,0.0008344724,0.0000987785,0.3183199],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311596,0.00032824292,0.00023081563,0.00043568265,0.0035317836,0.0023574636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334985,0.0017068291,0.00024740308,0.00014417236,0.0028670277,0.0016847509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036031955,0.000557052,0.0004896977,0.0015780149,0.02430841,0.0066590426,0.0022808674,0.01396324,0.009387639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01705816,0.00081479124,0.00072970736,0.0011483605,0.0030248913,0.0016093182,0.0022757645,0.014728441,0.0016556329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052323547,0.000035820223,0.0031299633,0.00006221734,0.000017978264,0.0008987551,0.0015839911,0.00012243268,0.0009888164,0.051459014,0.92807794,0.013570764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052903182,0.00007418939,0.023770815,0.0002656733,0.00006694097,0.0003778014,0.0032710223,0.00038784737,0.0013486234,0.0052864426,0.96493065,0.00016712093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93851644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061483562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028905138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08184822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20972246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289751062","doi":"","title":"Re-Evaluating Independence: The Emerging Problem of Crown-Police Alignment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Law; Warrant; Legislature; Accountability; Criminal procedure; Business","score_opus":0.04335142690477112,"score_gpt":0.3744433845908143,"score_spread":0.33109195768604316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289751062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28373766,0.006443871,0.06409675,0.22440085,0.00068191957,0.00012928105,0.00011017951,0.00030279724,0.42009667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892784,0.0005037741,0.003120962,0.0025468105,0.00014797879,0.000020224055,0.000011598434,0.000041449643,0.004328752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95855993,0.01568827,0.0022846875,0.005269237,0.011573729,0.0066240835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345658,0.03410177,0.006811155,0.008352415,0.011559191,0.0046096467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034020245,0.00032915396,0.0009586251,0.0024682165,0.016156018,0.016939312,0.0034718271,0.005329116,0.003366416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08345146,0.0007408709,0.00057620654,0.0029702983,0.05347439,0.012903086,0.013405658,0.011818271,0.0004366739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027566353,0.000018736404,0.008613282,0.00007682285,0.000022176204,0.00027818576,0.02677363,0.0006903969,0.00025535503,0.9005243,0.0050183083,0.057701204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040685212,0.000079936006,0.027057273,0.00046174525,0.000055967997,0.00032784295,0.039916486,0.0029681749,0.0014801298,0.8003274,0.12715828,0.00012605994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11823719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13253696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11823719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025285497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041841198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23509794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897844261","doi":"10.7202/1052480ar","title":"L’intoxication en contexte suicidaire et les deux sens de l’acte volontaire en droit criminel canadien : une critique de l’arrêt R. c. Turcotte","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01965018544779788,"score_gpt":0.30140028978773575,"score_spread":0.28175010433993786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897844261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09260336,0.053744122,0.0027395925,0.63304776,0.002234984,0.00005906418,0.0001053198,0.00003461865,0.21543112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88249433,0.019510899,0.0007851622,0.058782652,0.0006956218,0.000057534075,0.00002718508,0.000050041413,0.037596624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944366,0.0030054408,0.00012800675,0.00048191214,0.0011579174,0.0007900766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99351066,0.0030035055,0.0005690663,0.00027715226,0.0017630038,0.00087656133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056728874,0.0005744036,0.0005839752,0.0015316914,0.02082012,0.009055247,0.0022108739,0.0064574843,0.0035874373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007131544,0.00031099303,0.0004643664,0.001459633,0.05146842,0.0049304115,0.0047914637,0.012362743,0.00041765565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036038102,0.000030277166,0.0045169997,0.00026588686,0.00002436391,0.0013581772,0.30862343,0.000275972,0.00023671097,0.6243524,0.036488738,0.023790985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023127755,0.00005918317,0.014459329,0.0027596692,0.000052156396,0.0007947237,0.3146797,0.00055691716,0.00042666902,0.10233028,0.5637097,0.00014855833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8141731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8933333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05177318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05040452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37564242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898179403","doi":"","title":"Report on the Japan : Canada Law and Politics Seminar 2007 \"Problems on Contemporary Criminal Justice : Japan and Canada\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of law & politics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.060575952621861474,"score_gpt":0.2965814410263041,"score_spread":0.23600548840444266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898179403","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035229206,0.02422462,0.0005239309,0.7863579,0.021251548,0.001012802,0.031160088,0.0002980124,0.09994191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08252272,0.01646826,0.0017884969,0.22082156,0.00653601,0.001389563,0.0125397565,0.00031789645,0.6576157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495256,0.0002937815,0.0001321385,0.00023462185,0.0025981332,0.001788854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901113,0.0011946182,0.0003859652,0.00014896107,0.0049265902,0.0032325978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005593958,0.0012069046,0.001409824,0.0033474013,0.018998146,0.011278291,0.0031918155,0.023118107,0.025300367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006570776,0.00077981217,0.0014271247,0.004735681,0.0026227427,0.0036272062,0.004951908,0.011818888,0.0023325589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005485119,0.000058546255,0.0011245894,0.00007798269,0.00001088196,0.00008545044,0.00047225444,0.000069746406,0.00010176361,0.0030500751,0.99237293,0.00252087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012436933,0.000036594236,0.028889284,0.00024461912,0.00011431867,0.000035975976,0.006997504,0.00030540297,0.00048887235,0.0012135659,0.96143323,0.00011621409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9549231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04987964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04987964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22882913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3619038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898831201","doi":"","title":"LA CONTRIBUTION DU JUGE LEBEL AU DROIT JUDICIAIRE ET À LA TRADITION CIVILISTE","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04526007921419212,"score_gpt":0.3393400224150378,"score_spread":0.2940799432008457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898831201","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020307634,0.41424128,0.0025134634,0.37634027,0.007383036,0.0000307152,0.000166695,0.000065474786,0.17895143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69158,0.14476688,0.0027101778,0.05870244,0.006804636,0.000045137396,0.00013597996,0.00008445693,0.095170304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991126,0.0035978558,0.00021625706,0.00078656856,0.003825944,0.0016620656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97515035,0.014062385,0.0011745737,0.0007737063,0.0068923766,0.0019465839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074750492,0.00044713955,0.0006576518,0.004803496,0.011332683,0.014697169,0.0012835481,0.005344602,0.005396361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022127151,0.00042166476,0.0004201627,0.0037676536,0.01662426,0.003908217,0.0025094012,0.0071356203,0.0006569486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052257197,0.000025238956,0.004477594,0.0006481962,0.00005368933,0.0005123079,0.010037268,0.0003989314,0.00026864154,0.75418204,0.13240446,0.09693941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011228622,0.000026237218,0.012185782,0.0016995996,0.000041723088,0.00028211568,0.0041261828,0.00035098012,0.00022107578,0.028167736,0.95283055,0.000056756657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81212616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8986837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18787384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05793375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076619945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42034072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898893873","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1355","title":"The Hours are Long: Unreasonable Delay After Jordan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maxim; Charter; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05316084632723779,"score_gpt":0.3553215033738679,"score_spread":0.30216065704663014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898893873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071334854,0.109759316,0.004041068,0.5125674,0.008113447,0.00010086712,0.0003950377,0.00010638188,0.29358166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54540324,0.021327775,0.0014718733,0.36615172,0.0042460896,0.000116059535,0.0001555985,0.0001127534,0.061014973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99066657,0.0031212266,0.0005139443,0.0015953825,0.0026399195,0.0014628726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791381,0.013706948,0.0020246294,0.0013109131,0.0025976214,0.0012217044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010708312,0.00024029713,0.00052131567,0.00052319415,0.0042962455,0.00443487,0.0016475682,0.008124966,0.008566734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044155404,0.00037845437,0.0005683516,0.0006373042,0.0060799164,0.006743923,0.0029581392,0.013797545,0.0013829285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047031598,0.0001427364,0.0058495225,0.00053063233,0.00008621264,0.0018693131,0.007056591,0.0004702135,0.0007818349,0.6677951,0.22459167,0.09035579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011288562,0.00028038863,0.0057462454,0.0010841398,0.000091930146,0.00074369455,0.0054297065,0.00019478527,0.0016256282,0.12624666,0.85834575,0.000098168995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018112246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03714519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00437702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009382417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056631684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900451763","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3089941","title":"The Democratic Resilience of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Political science; Resilience (materials science); Law; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018191811074797858,"score_gpt":0.31195783041561065,"score_spread":0.2937660193408128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900451763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13268594,0.002074314,0.0025977215,0.09988645,0.0004583629,0.00008853744,0.00036945986,0.00008995203,0.7617492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789949,0.00044279607,0.0005079735,0.0017518327,0.00007162245,0.000018800407,0.00005234517,0.000032043703,0.01812762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879425,0.0019787303,0.00015463652,0.0012345976,0.0032252863,0.0054642097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410875,0.0040079206,0.000860441,0.0016515394,0.0061015715,0.0032698486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010325253,0.00040950478,0.0006623306,0.004050666,0.032549072,0.016163213,0.0021917245,0.0028744026,0.015106885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034330104,0.00040427258,0.0005445856,0.003487404,0.037073135,0.0045964895,0.0075562396,0.0049566566,0.0005770524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032305237,0.000010641539,0.002645376,0.00001924877,0.000016157432,0.00007942832,0.009792099,0.0005618878,0.00009381427,0.96513355,0.010585809,0.0110297715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057316545,0.000032041993,0.03601259,0.00034331958,0.0000940963,0.00008851136,0.030607352,0.0017978695,0.00040505026,0.48986843,0.44052106,0.0001723457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9737083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12737697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12737697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23766989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.924189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900928205","doi":"10.3138/9781487519117-005","title":"4 Canada’s “Constitution outside the Courts”: Provincial Non-enforcement of Constitutionally Suspect Federal Criminal Laws as Case Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Law; Constitution; Political science; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032434340986842086,"score_gpt":0.2626252715337703,"score_spread":0.2301909305469282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900928205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008455671,0.019962993,0.0012888835,0.066132315,0.0024745052,0.00025603935,0.0015182182,0.000044572982,0.89986694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16133185,0.01302363,0.0029006652,0.039647073,0.00041512423,0.00023471635,0.0010753936,0.00009343043,0.7812782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966158,0.00044846316,0.00006344124,0.00022202928,0.001653511,0.0009967102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997781,0.0010192093,0.00006438582,0.000104120925,0.0007446408,0.00028672893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024807905,0.00053132576,0.00043134377,0.002749342,0.01670667,0.0047996542,0.0021692726,0.0062120124,0.010965451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00475701,0.0005562784,0.00062971713,0.004087239,0.007906577,0.0012982659,0.0016808817,0.005229747,0.0009194643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016706446,0.000033301603,0.0013829938,0.00013286954,0.000010757626,0.0011004013,0.0059528667,0.0002598749,0.00016769108,0.33452037,0.6342091,0.022213051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015276004,0.000011483392,0.006423935,0.00040664704,0.000024451338,0.00041940363,0.0035235374,0.0002544986,0.00031838153,0.01762094,0.9709377,0.000043652704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98254997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07926787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07926787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1382904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5751313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900941409","doi":"","title":"Tanudjaja v Canada (Attorney General): Distinguishing Injusticiability and Deference on Motions to Strike","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Appeal; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Motion (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042243220621576365,"score_gpt":0.31598493763063534,"score_spread":0.27374171700905897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900941409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40813494,0.0052877725,0.0012773608,0.06467345,0.0006385328,0.00025255798,0.001169323,0.000071132155,0.51849496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94922554,0.0015562173,0.0006425822,0.01689181,0.00012733646,0.000038063255,0.00021344823,0.00001985927,0.03128515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927833,0.00043180172,0.00035263036,0.00039492818,0.0030578927,0.0029793822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938898,0.0022891269,0.0005316045,0.0002343433,0.0020179965,0.0010371571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037146963,0.00026509556,0.00042918415,0.0019305455,0.010969123,0.006464868,0.0016800667,0.0066005345,0.004483402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023778347,0.00044361263,0.00046637814,0.0019133476,0.006773125,0.0019252003,0.002003624,0.0051524565,0.0003949094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053462834,0.00016358573,0.1399987,0.0004357704,0.00010120218,0.0049091494,0.03445283,0.00082702306,0.003120762,0.62219137,0.13252841,0.060736537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003460826,0.00028684497,0.3968883,0.0019632156,0.0005282956,0.0019002885,0.042195473,0.0030736388,0.004506128,0.06484002,0.4829923,0.00047945543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033544485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033544485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107204124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24338341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900948938","doi":"10.21810/jicw.v1i2.649","title":"A Canadian Perspective on Lawfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Intelligence Conflict and Warfare","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06100555119053641,"score_gpt":0.37292887486014437,"score_spread":0.31192332366960795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900948938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004789723,0.059261892,0.0016359922,0.37023154,0.003701723,0.000038950086,0.00065498374,0.000036453235,0.5596487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.525021,0.16543354,0.0059156436,0.091832265,0.005064581,0.0001356018,0.0004741518,0.00015896847,0.20596427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978907,0.0022122087,0.00036478005,0.00086912984,0.0043475335,0.0024172203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98405683,0.0036546485,0.0004903803,0.00034799578,0.008889969,0.0025602218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059590205,0.0015537424,0.0012776216,0.013217529,0.020544976,0.01797549,0.0029778387,0.008274501,0.030650517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013622163,0.00068096374,0.0012256771,0.012430649,0.020406848,0.006344832,0.003810544,0.01120395,0.0012466931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016727197,0.000016351372,0.0004898,0.00015140824,0.000016748394,0.0001512192,0.0019755655,0.00042096464,0.00004645686,0.9126207,0.073868014,0.010226077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029537086,0.000016917475,0.003687062,0.001450737,0.00005299075,0.00016437146,0.0068260184,0.00069424545,0.00009567662,0.13405974,0.852805,0.00011762625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21366926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21366926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2508518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9120322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901670390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0086","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i> and the scope of admissible evidence on judicial review: Principled limitations or path dependency?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Charter; Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Duty; Law and economics; Law; Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0840774017677635,"score_gpt":0.3263102886251629,"score_spread":0.2422328868573994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901670390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040060845,0.051733654,0.01905475,0.79276395,0.0033123388,0.00014505361,0.00015127847,0.00014375825,0.12868917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3534855,0.03046549,0.047453366,0.5334095,0.011566208,0.001050361,0.00013118697,0.00019089303,0.022247447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8873676,0.06541604,0.008015068,0.011885063,0.02075148,0.006564782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8047636,0.16562031,0.0069223405,0.009198009,0.011418105,0.002077655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09397583,0.00067334995,0.0020191465,0.0034060422,0.005714882,0.024652382,0.0070944433,0.033990875,0.0032093755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16024165,0.001578017,0.0020899246,0.0028783795,0.06782675,0.022636004,0.0068414384,0.023808764,0.0012226589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012877509,0.000004719788,0.00013650671,0.00006723092,0.0000089680625,0.000037743957,0.00046377012,0.00011132855,0.000041131665,0.9809358,0.013416281,0.0047636684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003459476,0.00002603976,0.0003957407,0.0007769563,0.000024857123,0.00008710742,0.00039496797,0.0004548556,0.00023148285,0.9080107,0.08949564,0.00006700629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029603722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038182136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018135713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025577035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4969976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901792650","doi":"","title":"Power and wound: A study of the intersection of privilege and disadvantage in Symes v. Canada .","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Privilege (computing); Intersection (aeronautics); Power (physics); Political science; Geography; Law; Cartography; Physics","score_opus":0.0077394524844179215,"score_gpt":0.2928387641318213,"score_spread":0.2850993116474034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901792650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93136984,0.0010407116,0.00016136824,0.016197534,0.0000440083,0.00009518102,0.00041705437,0.000004326117,0.050669976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894471,0.0005988841,0.00008422574,0.0015786005,0.000010719475,0.00003801685,0.00010647163,0.000007887214,0.008128001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483865,0.0007697023,0.000084146435,0.00025648964,0.0011385616,0.0029124515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99134046,0.0027773955,0.00094250595,0.00021490874,0.0023697985,0.0023549227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030005334,0.0002869509,0.000772214,0.0028351787,0.031745523,0.006629198,0.0034669042,0.003808262,0.006588124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018215436,0.00042939693,0.00046471442,0.006645156,0.012846871,0.0035811772,0.0055041327,0.0075914473,0.00029777415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041607107,0.000899263,0.32364166,0.00017291144,0.00013191029,0.001475627,0.3945917,0.00062209513,0.00030087947,0.18770094,0.043000408,0.04704658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000724109,0.00008928209,0.34059703,0.00042126238,0.000112503665,0.00020092071,0.59766614,0.00077349885,0.00027859493,0.013731794,0.04597282,0.0000838586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99444205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08600359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08600359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18353248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6240026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902380474","doi":"","title":"KEEPING SECRETS: SURVEILLANCE POST PRIVILEGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Discretion; Secrecy; Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; Disadvantage; Scope (computer science); Enforcement; High Court; Computer science","score_opus":0.03150780530205958,"score_gpt":0.29836898566846004,"score_spread":0.26686118036640044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902380474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043357078,0.057351228,0.0153589705,0.112236924,0.00355837,0.00033757204,0.0006201887,0.00013945965,0.7670403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84009993,0.043348115,0.0060892245,0.048443608,0.0021138936,0.0001867825,0.00042419063,0.00008086067,0.05921339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871969,0.0033309392,0.0011106525,0.0013270464,0.005148846,0.0018855702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98010457,0.009524403,0.002664425,0.0021532376,0.004504475,0.00104884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007877374,0.00025119493,0.00041509848,0.0021728592,0.005697692,0.008226113,0.0014422718,0.005202029,0.0075769722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033913676,0.00036217173,0.0005103523,0.0021675476,0.01980276,0.009194902,0.0058331266,0.006059911,0.0011301925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453263,0.000024569059,0.0032775511,0.00045858277,0.000018177056,0.00070135796,0.011383491,0.00008475982,0.00027224468,0.87297416,0.026688825,0.084081635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002073593,0.000110696245,0.017510941,0.0029315802,0.000088407214,0.0023659328,0.009217349,0.00013370941,0.00094272074,0.16428174,0.8023298,0.000066458015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11011808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17100023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11011808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008815291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023415022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21895427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903715421","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Evidence Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.17555174541546748,"score_gpt":0.3600767748440726,"score_spread":0.1845250294286051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903715421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02813734,0.00904473,0.0021727928,0.06883864,0.008209236,0.004666886,0.035743035,0.0004893712,0.8426979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043241855,0.0032466871,0.005758404,0.051712282,0.000521251,0.0023290364,0.005160917,0.00020501824,0.8878245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98326474,0.0018223933,0.0021311883,0.0019233576,0.0071924585,0.0036658472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732295,0.011894294,0.0013921523,0.002690306,0.008791339,0.0020024246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01214507,0.0017788901,0.0018712577,0.006306399,0.013521511,0.01573994,0.008318004,0.018554516,0.027565029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03749598,0.004346992,0.0018971189,0.0067579076,0.005304632,0.003931844,0.0053613074,0.019642154,0.008224468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023977681,0.00021312895,0.006954078,0.00040244922,0.00011635169,0.0016994341,0.0029940838,0.0008606948,0.0016018183,0.23203018,0.73372173,0.019166252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019549775,0.00005792337,0.038688444,0.0008867319,0.00014198938,0.0002793854,0.0019727633,0.0003891964,0.0016211027,0.0075486726,0.94784176,0.0003765864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8929001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97820574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10709989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07261217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15958352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52684057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903961450","doi":"","title":"Judging the Social Sciences in Carter V Canada (AG)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adversarial system; Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Expert witness; Charter; Witness; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.023248629641344526,"score_gpt":0.31499093539499246,"score_spread":0.2917423057536479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903961450","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11078432,0.0128042465,0.0049804365,0.51290846,0.0036284055,0.0004248303,0.000500634,0.00013366794,0.353835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7615988,0.004416973,0.005023506,0.17398423,0.0009033557,0.00017814597,0.00012386075,0.00007778948,0.053693257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863912,0.0022882205,0.0003875374,0.0011762619,0.0046454803,0.005111218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857955,0.007881975,0.00058780186,0.00023470235,0.0032036612,0.0022963616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010552694,0.0003574622,0.0006113135,0.002026443,0.03128267,0.011566351,0.0027393862,0.01609286,0.003409354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03552173,0.0006890666,0.00070384704,0.0026678436,0.017214043,0.003196449,0.0033489938,0.013326596,0.00025188204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005357626,0.00002434018,0.0038483397,0.00014507148,0.000032597447,0.0021322449,0.018343057,0.0006668592,0.0005052561,0.8481999,0.105666764,0.020381873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000135474,0.00008009073,0.014595327,0.0008603854,0.0001874393,0.0006312936,0.025295762,0.0018217165,0.0022582228,0.20586072,0.7477534,0.00052021863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9639789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060091335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060091335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17074649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43599516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904406678","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada issues important ruling on disclosure and implied consent under PIPEDA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04899394381235447,"score_gpt":0.3279208245709068,"score_spread":0.2789268807585524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904406678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0620209,0.004415726,0.008676173,0.5292286,0.0075342674,0.0006761352,0.0027299176,0.00051834015,0.38419992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32706952,0.0033810262,0.008514376,0.4685653,0.0036593797,0.00048218778,0.00054992735,0.0004541152,0.1873243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9537838,0.0036035208,0.0022334796,0.0043371567,0.022532132,0.013509854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394959,0.03882299,0.0010916196,0.0026071866,0.014810941,0.0031712865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024386657,0.0013821399,0.0026877502,0.0033594894,0.025484858,0.018922029,0.010795118,0.07726437,0.008406679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076504014,0.0034676243,0.0038789914,0.0038639363,0.014367615,0.005814483,0.0067550763,0.055878535,0.0015565301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018316368,0.00011457008,0.0030724031,0.00014351505,0.00012518809,0.0012525241,0.0041828775,0.0005753015,0.0007831364,0.7593659,0.21961252,0.010588905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007144449,0.00017817772,0.011796112,0.001974584,0.0012302103,0.00066105195,0.0060778046,0.004134608,0.0052222046,0.17640361,0.79077816,0.000829037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8895559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9473128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11044413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05579897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16850269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40485173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905004868","doi":"","title":"UNMASKING THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN DISCRETIONARY NATIONAL SECURITY DECISIONS IN CANADA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; National security; Torture; Political science; Law; Criminalization; Civil liberties; State (computer science); Public administration; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.11396264168841275,"score_gpt":0.3348469862344929,"score_spread":0.22088434454608014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905004868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47678062,0.016807763,0.002303861,0.09319417,0.00049221853,0.0002399989,0.0002384594,0.000037971316,0.40990502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820577,0.0037353148,0.00060757186,0.0056942194,0.00004264116,0.000027254475,0.000042659583,0.0000109696675,0.007781809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97200304,0.007016006,0.0008876483,0.0016547742,0.011342157,0.007096309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451743,0.032888934,0.0040213633,0.002091458,0.013109485,0.0027146002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01868805,0.0002884711,0.0006663914,0.0032934474,0.024574049,0.014622478,0.0036361816,0.006777251,0.003235997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053509876,0.0007555773,0.00043363625,0.0051732375,0.0212318,0.0031747585,0.0059985323,0.0088584935,0.00018659563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016996384,0.00018006816,0.045324452,0.0008826674,0.00018544057,0.004490423,0.15225095,0.0022082834,0.0009510048,0.6462271,0.056543197,0.09058647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020996964,0.00012187788,0.10482544,0.0033993258,0.0004791345,0.0010792341,0.17602202,0.0037994508,0.0034310909,0.059517346,0.6466914,0.00042389942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98787224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99563134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14714502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14714502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23718601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905285799","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Local Governance Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Public administration; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.060262664740831945,"score_gpt":0.305191904016407,"score_spread":0.24492923927557506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905285799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0712317,0.0070134657,0.0011271156,0.06966879,0.00237536,0.00183907,0.013221706,0.00016154695,0.83336127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15863375,0.0030269641,0.0030145908,0.032756384,0.00020465207,0.0014579694,0.0030061048,0.00011456099,0.797785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934813,0.001037164,0.00063719123,0.0007259561,0.0020106158,0.002107841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99013805,0.0044953353,0.00073441677,0.0009487523,0.002511892,0.0011715884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053755403,0.00080636435,0.0009762057,0.0030570708,0.013665188,0.011513222,0.0039787744,0.0075287446,0.02788442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017906398,0.0018727365,0.0009361044,0.0055544693,0.0046391743,0.003291199,0.004901983,0.009173656,0.0024002278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024166977,0.00019397696,0.022852989,0.000490703,0.0001272203,0.0024228457,0.0111383,0.0012704595,0.0011933354,0.5008831,0.43410555,0.0250798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001685955,0.00006160516,0.0933162,0.0008821815,0.00014286181,0.00026056563,0.012371999,0.00051737844,0.0012808964,0.010860133,0.87983745,0.0003000786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9475753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98934233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09376559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09376559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12597163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68032014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906086483","doi":"","title":"2. Jane Doe v Toronto Commissioners of Police: a View from the Bar","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Engineering; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.04500768707799285,"score_gpt":0.31013209552219223,"score_spread":0.2651244084441994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906086483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040006693,0.020369906,0.0006145154,0.31471464,0.007360091,0.00012082813,0.0008205498,0.00008338433,0.6519154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035317946,0.0045606107,0.00038870025,0.22746705,0.0019106442,0.0001495793,0.00017682328,0.0001133875,0.7299153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559826,0.0006275031,0.00012955978,0.00047567792,0.0015644183,0.0016045782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970921,0.0014253093,0.00015982974,0.00008707778,0.0007931007,0.00044253728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025668177,0.0012155627,0.0007693128,0.0017051551,0.019491995,0.012024893,0.0032295312,0.04369114,0.025386313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008478141,0.0017440418,0.00083931873,0.0018118739,0.009095604,0.0058208625,0.0042125885,0.025141895,0.004302682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017954237,0.000015171182,0.00033849146,0.00008272207,0.000005718595,0.00029466394,0.0027685128,0.000075625205,0.00011128309,0.2357467,0.75522447,0.005318727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022916422,0.000017171466,0.0037834574,0.00045225237,0.00002407491,0.00014861254,0.0025985981,0.0001234444,0.00019111585,0.015377416,0.977191,0.000069934715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74877465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9405748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25122535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02515901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042717736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5054097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906206383","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0033","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Section (typography); Equal Protection Clause; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.07602330628816954,"score_gpt":0.28483974136079315,"score_spread":0.2088164350726236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906206383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005040492,0.004201094,0.0045738583,0.011851252,0.0008260356,0.00005105136,0.00019829583,0.000052374915,0.9732055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5357009,0.007526622,0.0034733913,0.01875125,0.0009096212,0.00013281628,0.0005735746,0.00018286795,0.4327489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732286,0.0005060434,0.00007346128,0.00031827338,0.0013579087,0.00042138444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735177,0.0011660989,0.00011719709,0.00029180382,0.0009853387,0.00008767031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022642727,0.00021962478,0.00027802036,0.00083381496,0.0036948414,0.0042616692,0.0009305838,0.0020500575,0.012538047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005869669,0.00021780262,0.00023047312,0.001035986,0.008992926,0.0026015688,0.0012583492,0.004630217,0.0014113912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022653853,0.0000021807368,0.000086695334,0.000016782073,7.975735e-7,0.00002234088,0.0005835281,0.000052004278,0.000056997233,0.97191095,0.019969255,0.0072961855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035772805,0.000009338933,0.00078381214,0.0003608547,0.00000906387,0.00009004074,0.0005861304,0.00016614543,0.00040042063,0.13315809,0.8644177,0.00001494981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15320802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18668978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15320802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008788931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015636478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30463248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907040471","doi":"","title":"STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN A NEW NUTSHELL","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpreter; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Legislature; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04890395639949631,"score_gpt":0.3395160502354411,"score_spread":0.29061209383594483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907040471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069551086,0.023501385,0.16101915,0.17760845,0.0077783107,0.00013180333,0.00031256946,0.00036244348,0.6223308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7554862,0.021046916,0.060618367,0.06699159,0.010632674,0.0003963401,0.00062769314,0.0010658223,0.083134405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97368705,0.009397412,0.0009586036,0.0024864997,0.011419523,0.0020508068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902992,0.003906437,0.0006316435,0.0013828201,0.0034364897,0.0003432317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019349111,0.0010970498,0.0017999721,0.0072605023,0.010301214,0.019359319,0.0054885247,0.0070395325,0.0049070586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024247842,0.0007348774,0.0014076447,0.0056272224,0.07124575,0.018987201,0.0069430456,0.019648297,0.0014850328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019645463,0.0000015816178,0.000034851186,0.000015055081,0.0000018168251,0.000012483326,0.0011137723,0.00007362428,0.000016847502,0.9945609,0.0023826053,0.0017846139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008836742,0.000007075782,0.00016865945,0.0003100717,0.000010361511,0.00006356766,0.0013275262,0.0004315142,0.000111464324,0.70734525,0.29018232,0.0000333479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1638402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15519051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1638402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030358396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033360012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32577312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907973464","doi":"","title":"LA LEGITIME DEFENSE EN DROIT PENAL CANADIEN : ANATOMIE D'UN MOYEN DE DEFENSE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Self defense; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Criminal law; Section (typography); Penal code; Criminology; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.022987089396512266,"score_gpt":0.28436157626453895,"score_spread":0.26137448686802667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907973464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05824579,0.065518394,0.0142996395,0.046650484,0.000836296,0.00007747093,0.00012617213,0.00008768358,0.8141581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879776,0.024780735,0.0047767577,0.0028130924,0.00033187575,0.00005276669,0.00006311553,0.00005557234,0.07914846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855834,0.0002096101,0.000028662396,0.00012541711,0.00052978756,0.00054812443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862695,0.000558359,0.00014668661,0.00011615259,0.00043334044,0.00011861339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015407505,0.00035098943,0.00029063207,0.0048482316,0.0062337965,0.008895516,0.0013218297,0.003975603,0.005203816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003974793,0.00034461985,0.0004146494,0.0025066957,0.037346166,0.004029465,0.0025697825,0.003421031,0.0007482522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009699316,0.0000029814498,0.00087232975,0.000054453314,0.0000045468364,0.0008449235,0.0066273664,0.0001501342,0.00018223867,0.9740034,0.0031903079,0.014057584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013557429,0.00003122689,0.0128707625,0.0010918112,0.00003391063,0.0048596654,0.016637603,0.000658828,0.0007305829,0.3471439,0.6158768,0.00005130035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42687133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48896995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5731287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018547576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02085477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84877336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908018640","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6837","title":"Two Myths of Administrative Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Deference; Political science; Duty; Legislature; Judicial deference; Standard of review; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Computer science","score_opus":0.15059853832563846,"score_gpt":0.45761073179224954,"score_spread":0.30701219346661107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908018640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058650128,0.006297814,0.013827293,0.8897378,0.0027907842,0.000043458935,0.000045743018,0.00006942877,0.081322655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6302859,0.00981905,0.023702756,0.2777342,0.011064277,0.0006232746,0.00010252103,0.00021482867,0.046453193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696675,0.012972365,0.0010611865,0.0033859583,0.009349438,0.0035635887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644273,0.019765688,0.0020301668,0.0041718753,0.006765674,0.0028393124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03641128,0.00048348206,0.00075977447,0.0037413926,0.010271224,0.020529652,0.0039291973,0.010859332,0.0029059902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046790812,0.0005410768,0.0008223679,0.0019410703,0.11930995,0.018286368,0.007796555,0.021655707,0.0007807308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004536738,0.000010610948,0.000088641005,0.000017137072,0.0000018103074,0.000014860235,0.0029955856,0.000058068585,0.000020946458,0.98501635,0.008433811,0.0033376447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026317402,0.000019470432,0.00041428345,0.0002465114,0.0000040837003,0.00008474726,0.0042034662,0.0003924527,0.00015526373,0.8069525,0.18747154,0.000029411029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029426869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018737266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03641128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01932078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027175838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1925636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908624351","doi":"10.7202/1054351ar","title":"Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor’s Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Power (physics); Criminal justice; Obligation; Economic Justice; Bargaining power; Sociology","score_opus":0.04453274096055949,"score_gpt":0.3485523148975887,"score_spread":0.3040195739370292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908624351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21607353,0.005527963,0.03305776,0.14049438,0.0006936052,0.00028438825,0.000054768752,0.00009982548,0.6037137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97112095,0.0009738562,0.00555921,0.0075691543,0.0001577802,0.000042094005,0.000012852376,0.00003282539,0.014531265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97237283,0.011393173,0.00090723,0.0016008537,0.007102215,0.006623731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834704,0.0095624905,0.0012105737,0.0009760434,0.0028885556,0.0018918912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023238316,0.0003883209,0.00048992014,0.0014443651,0.023470908,0.014526143,0.0021686885,0.008101558,0.0048230295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064206265,0.00055862207,0.0004817188,0.0011792823,0.023267373,0.006306701,0.0072911168,0.009727644,0.0006593249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083501676,0.00007251092,0.008779505,0.000086001666,0.000028349577,0.0028142002,0.0691814,0.0009506426,0.0016342693,0.8453571,0.014902701,0.056109764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007574636,0.000115804694,0.047435388,0.0010713581,0.00011717936,0.0023888466,0.1109319,0.0056540035,0.0031980344,0.54390264,0.2847183,0.00039088077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3224745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57844776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3224745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028290328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063003115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.641195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910558519","doi":"","title":"The Quebec Court of Appeal sentences to prison individuals found guilty of offenses in relation with bid-rigging in public construction contracts (Fedele)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Prison; Relation (database); Criminology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030299927636234954,"score_gpt":0.2955840605131331,"score_spread":0.2652841328768981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910558519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64548934,0.004107756,0.0011254466,0.1481519,0.0025434683,0.00077352073,0.0071727145,0.00012084688,0.19051506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8130625,0.0012683248,0.0009795378,0.039596427,0.0002680107,0.00018206252,0.0009841602,0.000029364046,0.14362964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977957,0.00023543574,0.00010351099,0.00022967107,0.00078775024,0.0008479328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263763,0.0029426618,0.00057810236,0.00027167483,0.002579989,0.0009899884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032142405,0.00034353932,0.00039254775,0.0016031341,0.013119716,0.0024280387,0.0015421588,0.007190985,0.009639477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014743304,0.00056400424,0.0004842461,0.0010644813,0.0020381634,0.00075710646,0.0013266457,0.0064263334,0.0006628007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000707024,0.0004736466,0.20667003,0.00030204875,0.00021105616,0.017835015,0.01586736,0.00061459775,0.0028114184,0.038590297,0.65202206,0.06389542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002479365,0.00035990833,0.64126325,0.0008905142,0.00035228767,0.0041638147,0.018655412,0.00221364,0.0030811424,0.004268889,0.32417467,0.00032857072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95341396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98847395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046586037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0247615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03646745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17965806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910596530","doi":"10.7202/1054354ar","title":"« Why Couldn’t You Just Keep Your Knees Together? » L’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08803811472317494,"score_gpt":0.3690641221948028,"score_spread":0.28102600747162787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910596530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08587085,0.03291717,0.012612558,0.56482434,0.006993871,0.00015227307,0.00015303286,0.00010972285,0.29636613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74338067,0.024386669,0.003861694,0.0731534,0.0021075439,0.00018346457,0.00010604553,0.00016834193,0.15265217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276537,0.003321968,0.00024817983,0.0006694551,0.0015873128,0.0014078015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539065,0.0016372016,0.0006362269,0.0003275687,0.0010696425,0.0009387744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004801832,0.0004077946,0.00042893403,0.000714716,0.012765586,0.008557551,0.0014489113,0.007345552,0.008575065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010807447,0.00038296307,0.00046915936,0.0007631152,0.025011994,0.0077793067,0.0066682803,0.013742644,0.0020611128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004284345,0.00008565883,0.005006199,0.0003014544,0.0000180962,0.0013168305,0.25352657,0.00009567204,0.000936749,0.6184456,0.08479234,0.03543203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007810383,0.000043054188,0.0040720594,0.0006007301,0.000010981754,0.0014186673,0.1274922,0.00008311838,0.0004743351,0.046791818,0.81896126,0.00004393376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023273539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04370542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023273539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058970363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011738686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046276093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911581924","doi":"10.7202/1059325ar","title":"Judicial Review, Judicial Revisionism and Judicial Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nagging; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Original jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.020171180920885375,"score_gpt":0.30900866047303455,"score_spread":0.28883747955214917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911581924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04194112,0.06969658,0.049859647,0.2543501,0.004117727,0.00032304242,0.00010703359,0.00021819853,0.5793866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333909,0.012294625,0.006370391,0.0183632,0.0073246746,0.0002471095,0.000044871533,0.000071716815,0.021892428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9451462,0.023817211,0.0019367567,0.00507674,0.018048216,0.005974843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9167093,0.058664795,0.004940307,0.0065101846,0.011557701,0.001617719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04249671,0.00042290558,0.001168631,0.002957983,0.0084544085,0.014624566,0.0032324584,0.009059056,0.0018123336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07767072,0.00057145813,0.0007090346,0.0020090854,0.05440464,0.0076430924,0.0041677086,0.010508668,0.00036216015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004411561,0.000008168498,0.00010790395,0.000029515591,0.000004999311,0.000042542557,0.0012420783,0.00027048416,0.00003638396,0.9867013,0.00517715,0.0063750553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049074843,0.000023286319,0.0004516884,0.00021924941,0.000014452533,0.00008254016,0.00054614205,0.001239112,0.00022373603,0.9059907,0.09112502,0.000035004177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015898423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012346348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04249671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018389368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024444412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22474676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911869162","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Joan Barrett,","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Political science; Statutory law; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019036106994754692,"score_gpt":0.30678205173696055,"score_spread":0.28774594474220583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911869162","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006320927,0.8583413,0.00017810683,0.06498327,0.06104155,0.00006488838,0.0003833372,0.00007526745,0.014869078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010548807,0.7545957,0.00052239356,0.08077302,0.04043,0.00019089108,0.00081339007,0.00010924914,0.12151054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984347,0.00020780129,0.0001412082,0.00022945112,0.0008867503,0.00010018166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366546,0.0019981542,0.00051005196,0.00019040029,0.0029118217,0.0007241658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019146258,0.0016199427,0.0023606226,0.0036288057,0.0009576898,0.0039001042,0.0031387499,0.0049336315,0.048214797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012329392,0.00074615236,0.00073282316,0.0050737816,0.0011702497,0.0031439373,0.0016748745,0.0058953427,0.05777091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064715123,0.0000036768606,0.000013771046,0.00046924994,0.000004813652,0.00001407294,0.000009722491,0.000009756774,0.000014084432,0.00015499536,0.98034817,0.01895118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013152388,0.000006418103,0.00013280097,0.0012078705,0.000013563498,0.00016193744,0.00001972845,0.000008720217,0.000018754792,0.0002238952,0.9981856,0.00000757739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008851173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020860258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048214797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028019955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067678015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16129458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911900466","doi":"10.4324/9781315165950","title":"Criminal Law and Precrime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08425168733058977,"score_gpt":0.3675954641243153,"score_spread":0.2833437767937256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911900466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061693667,0.03301659,0.0025343865,0.06333973,0.0024645138,0.00003434988,0.00008288958,0.000055780245,0.8923024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44200483,0.030183692,0.0022251233,0.053663515,0.003631995,0.00013278812,0.00024574652,0.00013164598,0.46778062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825543,0.0004985139,0.000055672175,0.0002323378,0.0006045403,0.00035345924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986313,0.00070085365,0.00012308396,0.0001203261,0.00027608688,0.00014828393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000931711,0.00048335167,0.00024323471,0.0014768915,0.007210003,0.005710408,0.0009387034,0.002829271,0.009707872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033030724,0.00024804674,0.0002534544,0.0014772275,0.020595878,0.004372023,0.0034538012,0.0042698374,0.001207667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030720648,0.000006790461,0.00014736936,0.000022588745,0.000001116509,0.00004588817,0.003063198,0.000054129843,0.000015851088,0.92967755,0.056392517,0.010569893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037285092,0.000010915079,0.0008425487,0.00020335628,0.0000020482946,0.00016507697,0.0025693013,0.00009704143,0.000059265334,0.14096063,0.8550731,0.000012974901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07988901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11115918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07988901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009686034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072641773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15884799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912319985","doi":"10.7202/1055484ar","title":"L’approche canadienne : assurer la protection des droits de la personne de façon distinctive","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017808781985040285,"score_gpt":0.25756029108215583,"score_spread":0.23975150909711554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912319985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01754069,0.01293778,0.008788491,0.34843996,0.004143581,0.00012282048,0.00010623795,0.00007298216,0.60784733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55066997,0.013632496,0.006822451,0.11909884,0.001360512,0.00021756414,0.00012376491,0.00013134825,0.30794314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985335,0.004107843,0.00031283963,0.0017235284,0.0056789853,0.0028418715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322814,0.001774477,0.0002889255,0.0004940122,0.0031933214,0.0010211628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007384026,0.0006873246,0.000488851,0.0012659668,0.01831914,0.0145787755,0.0036732242,0.013125848,0.013251623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0116292825,0.00031910927,0.000744441,0.0014753845,0.024835885,0.0049176826,0.0073278826,0.010336402,0.002353113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020669964,0.000022033993,0.0012907663,0.00019142378,0.000019014009,0.0004474215,0.038072836,0.00023147,0.00035496653,0.8511937,0.07920331,0.028952425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009343568,0.000020808046,0.0016581975,0.0004946664,0.00002095737,0.000252694,0.0184259,0.00016238964,0.00034178866,0.044074602,0.93449473,0.00004399589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46974045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63731277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53025955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026080646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060144525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93401253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913197957","doi":"","title":"Strafrechtelijke afhandeling van seksueel kindermisbruik in de context van scheidingsproblematiek","year":2018,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Theology; Art; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05422706619301375,"score_gpt":0.32575305457336884,"score_spread":0.2715259883803551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913197957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10889303,0.026027191,0.092013784,0.12943825,0.009403568,0.0015362897,0.0020896231,0.0005295721,0.6300687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70817655,0.020580258,0.052212827,0.020039039,0.0013037967,0.0025178092,0.0012069031,0.0008858071,0.1930771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97551006,0.013872396,0.0022107358,0.0018093057,0.004633022,0.0019644944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94971347,0.040636703,0.001958572,0.0033769675,0.00291559,0.0013986325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022672819,0.00055199495,0.00069210556,0.0028860744,0.008911165,0.018547134,0.0024883423,0.0045379233,0.029841382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06393997,0.000680969,0.0008595781,0.0036054216,0.012316706,0.012451946,0.012543385,0.008728588,0.0040964144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011132318,0.00009606648,0.0037540845,0.0014992618,0.000029266337,0.0014367364,0.11496186,0.0007007582,0.00092530967,0.6626954,0.06353541,0.15025441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018004805,0.000045393153,0.004542843,0.0031006972,0.00003397016,0.0005287898,0.0683767,0.00033198594,0.0019669377,0.08892375,0.8320227,0.000108093955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01969724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058691945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029841382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00982909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020169005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11990672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913346266","doi":"10.3968/10690","title":"The Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Obatianed Co-defendant Confession in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Witness; Law; Criminal procedure; Legislation; Political science; Voluntariness; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0233669500163668,"score_gpt":0.3375525587376357,"score_spread":0.3141856087212689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913346266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76844853,0.0039620176,0.012869697,0.008500102,0.00039000585,0.0002911658,0.00035734172,0.00004768948,0.20513347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603004,0.00066805474,0.0013636408,0.00060991023,0.00007882358,0.00006413392,0.0000806669,0.0000067276765,0.011098085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927516,0.0010173891,0.0010789362,0.0014899091,0.0021713204,0.0014909097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608743,0.0010235904,0.0009253704,0.00052192784,0.0010438233,0.0003977701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044362643,0.00024795666,0.0005850889,0.001485088,0.006439725,0.003506283,0.0011366215,0.001902139,0.003501084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007577822,0.00036249813,0.00064580713,0.0012657758,0.0064499015,0.0018132835,0.0023070143,0.002318181,0.00023246797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017236482,0.00009425539,0.084524326,0.0003551643,0.00013328623,0.005312956,0.009556055,0.0016903123,0.0022069905,0.8512474,0.00810873,0.03659825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021617967,0.00029876153,0.34598744,0.0014980749,0.0006629534,0.0058930153,0.008854271,0.024647895,0.007938582,0.40440044,0.1990788,0.00052346324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08063456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09464133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08063456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004386487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011522222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16033041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913809600","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2018.20995","title":"La réforme du Code de procédure civile du Québec : une nouvelle culture de l’exécution ?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021109636610618657,"score_gpt":0.28794609108785985,"score_spread":0.2668364544772412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913809600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21283203,0.015157911,0.015402191,0.26699543,0.0015495446,0.00020071138,0.00064245187,0.00016102,0.4870587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93532467,0.0022692976,0.0023902338,0.007365255,0.000107649954,0.000058704074,0.00010732858,0.00004236748,0.05233461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919795,0.0025670878,0.00021058662,0.0006670697,0.0029122226,0.0016635015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98826617,0.002331027,0.0009838082,0.00090311,0.006518262,0.0009975823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061825775,0.00031185674,0.00033113747,0.001204696,0.008985004,0.0071474165,0.0014536068,0.0025903385,0.005904062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017190333,0.00027176284,0.00028678955,0.0015955042,0.012828742,0.0027015128,0.0017284778,0.004826885,0.0004646059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035466448,0.00003368191,0.007954357,0.00010524468,0.00002614875,0.00018903942,0.01913851,0.00076757115,0.00055979536,0.8958234,0.032085788,0.043281022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004226457,0.00010100922,0.06950384,0.0015776363,0.000076711076,0.00016231033,0.019549636,0.0032722978,0.0015650896,0.06581841,0.838143,0.00018777278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95524675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96429604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07272241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07272241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.111367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52764046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913819351","doi":"10.3390/laws8010005","title":"The Evolving Common Law Jurisprudence Combatting the Threat of Terrorism in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Convention","score_opus":0.030481947602808448,"score_gpt":0.30861611831997876,"score_spread":0.27813417071717034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913819351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23397097,0.06667443,0.0065547586,0.105073854,0.0012982575,0.00015257501,0.0005414516,0.00012283363,0.5856108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566194,0.015756492,0.0024168743,0.011422595,0.0001271861,0.000027060714,0.00014188215,0.000056731562,0.013431673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848828,0.0014050492,0.0005042425,0.0012299104,0.008480896,0.003497084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98704773,0.0043050735,0.00086495274,0.0004613303,0.0056799366,0.0016408816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004781864,0.00039203226,0.00068876555,0.004941344,0.019230688,0.019580517,0.0024828599,0.004526433,0.0013456304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015517497,0.0005309603,0.0006812646,0.0066069877,0.030990161,0.0023162938,0.0035249053,0.006775454,0.00016652141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015484287,0.000015743286,0.0042732093,0.00009374412,0.000018034816,0.00053785637,0.009082362,0.0013052229,0.00034275363,0.95152766,0.015588918,0.017198892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034960616,0.000035759833,0.077492125,0.0020851912,0.00013598497,0.0006586219,0.045187004,0.0036717854,0.0013772163,0.093122475,0.7757841,0.00041485514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99309325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99353176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22813654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22813654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22640306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8952522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914140473","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Allan Manson,","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01922482970445926,"score_gpt":0.3061189524680304,"score_spread":0.2868941227635711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914140473","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013189444,0.8267422,0.00023625023,0.10053654,0.043029886,0.000058823658,0.00045710034,0.00008748256,0.028719863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019336345,0.637525,0.00048654954,0.08114861,0.02951716,0.0001682476,0.0009256915,0.00011229703,0.24818274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905986,0.00014774073,0.000071653325,0.00013948223,0.000521094,0.000060200775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962126,0.0014867812,0.00023317288,0.00011453547,0.0016158092,0.0003372027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013445286,0.0012509217,0.0017045748,0.0031604609,0.001081537,0.0029894745,0.002425251,0.0038917789,0.0676014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008389707,0.000548652,0.00045494147,0.004199483,0.0010681079,0.003134605,0.0013608257,0.0040939776,0.0542094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044582125,0.000003339324,0.000012304766,0.0002873817,0.0000022089882,0.000013776756,0.000020563473,0.000008275514,0.000014029185,0.00028183102,0.9778697,0.021482132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057367247,0.0000041054514,0.00013207196,0.00061389385,0.0000050055073,0.000109099165,0.00003227156,0.000007373776,0.000014061366,0.00026354942,0.99880826,0.0000046827768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010479717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028285842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0676014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023430344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004829864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2261492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914151147","doi":"","title":"Is the Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full? An Exploratory Study of Defence Lawyers’ Constructions of Plea Negotiations and Accused Persons’ Rights within the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Brock University Digital Repository (Brock University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Criminal justice; Law; Negotiation; Political science; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.034495128071860975,"score_gpt":0.24918093415555795,"score_spread":0.21468580608369697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914151147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98242515,0.0006019437,0.0005669641,0.0058358856,0.000028710087,0.00007241371,0.00003310936,0.000007526355,0.010428341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945919,0.0004430691,0.00028823823,0.00070279464,0.000008260956,0.000024185108,0.000017200375,0.000010591428,0.0039137104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900309,0.004601513,0.00028756977,0.0007548234,0.0017059431,0.0026191957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884837,0.0066417214,0.0015700486,0.0003370033,0.0013463191,0.0016212164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069134207,0.00039895214,0.00075886346,0.00190356,0.03237054,0.010867161,0.0027702898,0.0029811165,0.0038374967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016504638,0.000977362,0.0003160938,0.003318415,0.03481062,0.0053364355,0.006428255,0.004629261,0.00022259691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012021159,0.000014417373,0.0021760005,0.000022846332,0.0000011955392,0.0003296714,0.99319977,0.0000128696065,0.0002867594,0.0022453002,0.0003244372,0.0013746059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025039565,0.000013251325,0.0027169685,0.00004714209,0.0000027780736,0.000048130372,0.9883553,0.00004579887,0.000044783832,0.00023820504,0.008476373,0.000008802032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8576856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9371555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14231437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07452978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054714225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54075396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914773908","doi":"10.1177/1365712718824123","title":"The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Convict; Mistake; Law; Jury; Statute; Reasonable doubt; Order (exchange); Common law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.16362823244949623,"score_gpt":0.4585632105028251,"score_spread":0.2949349780533289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914773908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070827636,0.07740225,0.1897823,0.14725882,0.0082391435,0.00043946205,0.00063431356,0.00017518208,0.5689859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65725636,0.047576085,0.1635186,0.057891775,0.020344429,0.002249474,0.00074635627,0.00030122837,0.05011572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95936334,0.02608429,0.0025009424,0.0042558573,0.0066382713,0.0011572228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9383528,0.049829405,0.002747099,0.0040449905,0.004556119,0.00046958143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042930987,0.0010869389,0.0014348323,0.006193829,0.0055127554,0.013038255,0.0037835878,0.010965187,0.0061984393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04854865,0.0008882102,0.0016884055,0.0038198065,0.04750474,0.021251027,0.0046087303,0.010513817,0.0018727677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055822356,0.0000030223464,0.000035770303,0.00014604998,0.0000087422895,0.000099493474,0.0009094054,0.00008149149,0.0000660639,0.9934673,0.0026599593,0.0025170948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013733093,0.00003193012,0.00017320873,0.000685078,0.000025730282,0.00031460228,0.00069934054,0.00036286275,0.00039854101,0.7782592,0.21900326,0.000032519114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036496834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029407777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042930987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006911597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061248126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22704351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915010883","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Study of Terrorism Charges and Terrorism Trials in Canada between September 2001 and September 2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Conviction; CLARITY; Political science; Criminology; Law; Demographics; Criminal law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.054776744281488876,"score_gpt":0.38189772587430443,"score_spread":0.32712098159281555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915010883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97295296,0.0010369625,0.0001309572,0.002423293,0.00006115363,0.00015493864,0.008957164,0.000018053015,0.014264552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883002,0.0010946936,0.00018477174,0.00044920627,0.000030365625,0.00005654751,0.0040759626,0.000018758152,0.0057894182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959954,0.00025594732,0.00022551994,0.00026995526,0.0017285896,0.0015246016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97812015,0.0019623819,0.005264107,0.000317548,0.010884285,0.0034515515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015312108,0.00030161912,0.00059544994,0.004954519,0.007633532,0.003538727,0.0019975083,0.0008640594,0.003969058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013371193,0.00052158855,0.0004616468,0.011184236,0.0020966888,0.0012362148,0.0022011192,0.0028046547,0.0005416209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026498327,0.00018455925,0.9442651,0.00016685406,0.00006767447,0.00043639637,0.01579353,0.0002739264,0.00017282699,0.002229697,0.017054703,0.019089527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000630694,0.000020383375,0.97587776,0.00008984548,0.00001359873,0.00005886465,0.014684508,0.00018714642,0.00008134159,0.00004586373,0.008911821,0.00002261844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99830604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068128176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068128176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07526872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4943068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915173087","doi":"","title":"Resisting to Penal Populism By Which Means? Discursive Strategies to Barrier Conservative’s Criminal Law Reform in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Deportation; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Immigration","score_opus":0.03446119606055683,"score_gpt":0.32617390047113265,"score_spread":0.29171270441057584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915173087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5506265,0.0020204564,0.0016911823,0.26320207,0.00079210434,0.00026531133,0.00022723014,0.000074539625,0.18110065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565355,0.0004226564,0.0006246737,0.01693502,0.000059111277,0.00006540919,0.000042152322,0.00005090402,0.025264567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821599,0.0030939945,0.00039692814,0.0012189435,0.0036347853,0.0094954185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97480935,0.0053874655,0.0012841119,0.00081568764,0.008145667,0.009557705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01153919,0.0004055647,0.00090029615,0.0028468203,0.05577812,0.019098917,0.0043234974,0.007388022,0.008474731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039586503,0.0006693683,0.0005512386,0.0030910333,0.01996199,0.003475576,0.009663036,0.013570969,0.00042022375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021792806,0.00027220385,0.03583697,0.00021791892,0.00010433759,0.0009755407,0.21925592,0.0010346859,0.0012789923,0.5752133,0.11102596,0.05456619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018143654,0.0001149659,0.084039636,0.0006626322,0.00019147203,0.0002192572,0.3184955,0.002340677,0.0018709099,0.040886115,0.55064285,0.00035450258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16778257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16778257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41480693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96525425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916002909","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p74","title":"The Accused Privacy Rights in the Sudanese Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Right to privacy; Human rights; The Right to Privacy; Legislation; Statutory law; Criminal procedure; Law enforcement; Bill of rights; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.02406401330468809,"score_gpt":0.3171481105581854,"score_spread":0.2930840972534973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916002909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8307516,0.0034750304,0.001792175,0.0134941535,0.00008581996,0.00005113188,0.000046889716,0.0000070350043,0.15029608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939727,0.0008623632,0.00041776744,0.00096667267,0.000024639783,0.000017684959,0.000011831073,0.0000024535566,0.0037237818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99058855,0.006735339,0.00026510176,0.00032625213,0.0010871285,0.000997581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532723,0.0026108685,0.00092455256,0.000295624,0.000588487,0.0002532233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048672026,0.00013305563,0.0001974326,0.0017109637,0.012997005,0.007433718,0.00045438652,0.0014362049,0.002726546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008215003,0.0001973052,0.000132763,0.0021780531,0.011935468,0.0049697403,0.0047101625,0.002016052,0.000227193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016324038,0.000059930317,0.010741938,0.00012327773,0.000007746131,0.001767856,0.3393659,0.00010644771,0.0014858784,0.62480557,0.0019327338,0.019586287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002005509,0.00006448389,0.03909694,0.0011003612,0.000034055498,0.0022236537,0.57766074,0.0006320148,0.0019073967,0.09109648,0.2861015,0.000062301166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01027797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010245681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012997005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005207251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006100658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037781477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916111119","doi":"10.22459/ca.2019.11","title":"Sentencing Acts: Appraisal of Court Records in Canada and Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ANU Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.08710162567786404,"score_gpt":0.3285061917631983,"score_spread":0.24140456608533423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916111119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94329923,0.00531815,0.0002592884,0.0026892843,0.00007566015,0.00021981525,0.0032925957,0.000024940742,0.04482111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534537,0.0057248855,0.0007542877,0.00032155344,0.000031962223,0.00008654477,0.0021931522,0.000030006324,0.037403855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949155,0.00082319183,0.00031443516,0.00023230874,0.0028499963,0.00086454954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801822,0.003878901,0.0017056336,0.00023516033,0.012294741,0.0017033919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002695151,0.00028242773,0.0004971997,0.012696435,0.009192269,0.004987792,0.0025735986,0.0009880662,0.003199585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024076885,0.00047938174,0.00033331563,0.018565387,0.002057687,0.0011139585,0.002040032,0.0011471212,0.0004450481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044438906,0.00029727997,0.5418262,0.0008730905,0.00014776335,0.003334333,0.14965726,0.0035081531,0.0008992823,0.018117134,0.054356318,0.22653882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060488733,0.00005617461,0.9293871,0.0002876821,0.000044274533,0.00024760686,0.048910886,0.0011441372,0.00016819427,0.00042476907,0.019276684,0.000046362995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99332833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06568769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06568769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10389368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4765998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918754399","doi":"","title":"The “Best Interests of the Child” as a Factor in Allowing Foreigners with Criminal Records to Enter Canada and in Staying the Deportation of Foreign National Offenders from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Criminology; Criminal record; Political science; Immigration; Foreign national; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.22727127223096946,"score_gpt":0.5141562471285382,"score_spread":0.2868849748975688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918754399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30232427,0.0040995316,0.0018761462,0.19467016,0.0008837933,0.00014503956,0.00021528099,0.000055345965,0.49573034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319364,0.0013784957,0.0011735895,0.03410756,0.0001174349,0.000050890096,0.000057787805,0.000048767673,0.031129133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872349,0.0021358675,0.00029768978,0.0006690222,0.0025047525,0.007157857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838082,0.00365348,0.000980505,0.00035598525,0.0032788832,0.007923027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074626603,0.0002706115,0.000337185,0.00081051054,0.026400518,0.011290081,0.0024316334,0.0056300038,0.007895887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017305868,0.00048804714,0.00049807376,0.0009230606,0.016947836,0.0030474481,0.005862939,0.0105388975,0.0005115492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018248179,0.0001726117,0.09367322,0.00017258042,0.00006245872,0.0068930564,0.08148632,0.00089906,0.00086330913,0.6423388,0.13361867,0.03963741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066953675,0.00018256986,0.101206034,0.0025570747,0.0002061302,0.0041168206,0.2169147,0.0011507841,0.0021011108,0.029714195,0.6414915,0.00029214117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89608276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9675453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10391724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040811095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13087359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29610658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919878300","doi":"","title":"TRANSFORMING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW THE DIDACTIC ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Political science; Precedent; Mainstream","score_opus":0.05413915082977199,"score_gpt":0.31507479021099816,"score_spread":0.26093563938122616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919878300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02640919,0.041586377,0.005997584,0.58872545,0.004477823,0.00011831209,0.0004457908,0.00017169218,0.33206776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099839,0.026279716,0.0066483743,0.06833791,0.0023139156,0.0000653438,0.00016199512,0.00015170666,0.086057164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865389,0.0022754641,0.0002908522,0.0011181677,0.0062670014,0.0035096172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97622013,0.004370377,0.0007285598,0.000622945,0.0118040135,0.0062539894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010031138,0.0004025896,0.0005270937,0.0046104407,0.02329121,0.019073334,0.002369803,0.0047095213,0.005795022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026546268,0.00065405644,0.00032276928,0.0042328774,0.027806759,0.0032811172,0.0052551758,0.007911924,0.0005943508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002687987,0.00003619994,0.0022706543,0.00012569437,0.000020860465,0.00024235711,0.005808109,0.0006328248,0.00038077688,0.81976056,0.11557521,0.055119894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002779577,0.00001923837,0.0076897284,0.00037346035,0.000019366693,0.000057767615,0.0034393137,0.00066067633,0.00023707791,0.055339746,0.93205863,0.00007724111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98717725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99416465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.764225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23577498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3632062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8863927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920824330","doi":"10.7202/1056926ar","title":"Le pouvoir discrétionnaire de poursuite limité par l’instauration d’un programme de mesures de rechange","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02603215084303591,"score_gpt":0.2833058125478369,"score_spread":0.257273661704801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920824330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36900145,0.0052515115,0.03511076,0.02071548,0.00083037425,0.0011618504,0.00063625246,0.000569338,0.5667229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8067002,0.0010939584,0.0077196998,0.0046159755,0.00017338111,0.0004620228,0.00019303178,0.00010152909,0.17894012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936635,0.0023906338,0.00053472305,0.0015293506,0.0030894869,0.0030893732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911498,0.0032021883,0.001029729,0.0014745843,0.002239333,0.0009043884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062995064,0.00057971507,0.0005310468,0.0016034036,0.006333977,0.0037445505,0.0016243466,0.0030953148,0.013561091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014443603,0.000573012,0.00083320215,0.0014657875,0.004534136,0.0015104682,0.0032480794,0.005321566,0.0017611806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051815016,0.00064665364,0.038757205,0.0005601334,0.00020581261,0.0011880124,0.021135222,0.0069675464,0.012053365,0.6375098,0.037488263,0.24296983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034032512,0.0014940441,0.2172299,0.0011656808,0.000267071,0.0008954763,0.006986109,0.004904436,0.013522113,0.048995093,0.70375764,0.00044205115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28368604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45976216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28368604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014004153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028045893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921761527","doi":"","title":"The Question of the Constitutionality of Non-Economic Damage Caps in Personal Injury Cases in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Personal injury; Political science; History; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.016910806222451422,"score_gpt":0.3132199670846373,"score_spread":0.29630916086218584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921761527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51991594,0.01031234,0.0016657716,0.18522607,0.0006943548,0.0002724332,0.0017215622,0.000066347486,0.2801252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808477,0.0015773114,0.0005323672,0.0109087415,0.00016081733,0.000034926597,0.00014972163,0.000019582445,0.0057687922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689098,0.0031720928,0.0015329822,0.002957707,0.008786385,0.014641001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91964406,0.04233742,0.0051126913,0.002675227,0.0221981,0.008032462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020372674,0.00047118982,0.0019664967,0.005081117,0.01952549,0.019609693,0.0079531185,0.010025257,0.0063008703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106948,0.0015351628,0.0012310364,0.0064360253,0.018254807,0.0058878553,0.004862957,0.0141986655,0.00030424815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005448265,0.00023027971,0.07857428,0.0004976303,0.0005770237,0.001246977,0.010717211,0.0046593193,0.00077483477,0.81819093,0.05023087,0.033755805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001225881,0.0003116202,0.46632022,0.003949595,0.0024157444,0.0009938789,0.050476465,0.011905775,0.003606169,0.22365679,0.23398672,0.001151187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99226284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15103468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15103468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27699202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98467946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923835347","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198794578.003.0001","title":"Responding to Wrongful Convictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Law; Commission; Political science; Criminal law; Royal Commission; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Criminal court; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.06723504331728755,"score_gpt":0.35200779436921165,"score_spread":0.2847727510519241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923835347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056538943,0.09738537,0.005178917,0.3062451,0.016720394,0.0006007732,0.0006631207,0.00029859107,0.51636887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5599295,0.08710109,0.005747262,0.10883703,0.0057975547,0.00045632623,0.0009478032,0.00029460024,0.23088898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824771,0.006913034,0.0011385216,0.00078233774,0.0064100656,0.0022788276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95662135,0.021249468,0.003322674,0.0016083361,0.014045431,0.0031527146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013481759,0.00025143023,0.00068061275,0.0036998312,0.0038751329,0.0053024157,0.0014779015,0.0029744739,0.015262777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082624145,0.0004176232,0.000444903,0.0015530223,0.002580331,0.0026649488,0.005019654,0.004631006,0.0045737773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049803788,0.00008284155,0.008584832,0.0021020495,0.000034845292,0.0026313008,0.025749471,0.0002087931,0.00070501457,0.074205205,0.556468,0.32917783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010186928,0.00007247914,0.017015351,0.0063407663,0.000032604697,0.0018074292,0.027055934,0.00019270403,0.0006869354,0.01902577,0.92770797,0.000051893592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022397354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04781534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022397354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059442045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017575433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071299195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929839016","doi":"10.11114/ijlpa.v2i1.4117","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the State Risk Harm Paradigm","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Harm; Context (archaeology); Normative; Criminology; Charter; Risk society; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.02664774922519254,"score_gpt":0.3360038582367707,"score_spread":0.3093561090115782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929839016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059333567,0.006299999,0.094106525,0.11587199,0.0010156292,0.00016012035,0.00015087803,0.00009182486,0.7229695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687256,0.0017928696,0.0048418376,0.0056620175,0.00068883493,0.00017420984,0.000043882956,0.000030399908,0.01804025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381155,0.0025372477,0.00024459776,0.00094247086,0.0016670307,0.0007971152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396306,0.0031255437,0.0007568074,0.0008194464,0.0009289202,0.00040618883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007413838,0.00042847914,0.0005631786,0.0023472235,0.0060483622,0.007804076,0.0019545606,0.007800913,0.005658261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008450092,0.00037156127,0.0011123838,0.0010213339,0.04943797,0.0088279825,0.007271137,0.011551233,0.0006923048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018832278,0.0000063471657,0.000100464495,0.0000067404717,0.0000018980381,0.000037931266,0.00044347375,0.00008941771,0.00001004724,0.99818254,0.0003021557,0.00081707945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004180473,0.00000482781,0.000105343075,0.000030025836,0.0000036295162,0.000051802075,0.00023806014,0.00026500146,0.000029896999,0.9948007,0.004461551,0.000004886135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041139675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031353259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007804076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059148753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050824066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042915702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931356137","doi":"","title":"WHITHER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Economic Justice; Administrative law; Judicial activism; Standard of review; Remedial education; Action (physics); Law and economics; Judicial deference; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.043854095294708524,"score_gpt":0.3552670090950194,"score_spread":0.3114129138003109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931356137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022216355,0.078458905,0.0114430105,0.6591115,0.03379566,0.00012455456,0.00020814313,0.00032375654,0.21431293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15942201,0.062425733,0.01886562,0.4387595,0.0510314,0.00019896819,0.0004193371,0.00043910037,0.2684383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9235337,0.02346995,0.0029127502,0.009356143,0.034840483,0.005886906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8559459,0.05374598,0.005579991,0.019302865,0.054186042,0.0112392055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034308556,0.00084076443,0.0016474592,0.0050827563,0.010246067,0.0147961425,0.002632991,0.014923871,0.03435755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13381214,0.0008458457,0.0010092186,0.003228124,0.019712437,0.013953243,0.0054899645,0.017613348,0.008300013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003519346,0.000031609074,0.000534757,0.00032287545,0.00003982883,0.00018372151,0.0011339439,0.00015750204,0.00034738015,0.5115973,0.3678838,0.11773215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023045672,0.000033995628,0.00089471997,0.00076785986,0.000021403916,0.00013582826,0.00048221616,0.00018735258,0.00019466784,0.064336546,0.9328828,0.0000396384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119079284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26064745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021299824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05516991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23677236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935913652","doi":"","title":"Injury and Mischief versus the Public Interest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Freedom of expression; Supreme court; Political science; Expression (computer science); Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.15113245724839375,"score_gpt":0.39378759888558157,"score_spread":0.24265514163718782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935913652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017418154,0.019158402,0.0026663956,0.57722276,0.0024954218,0.000028775397,0.0001317398,0.000024960262,0.3808533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7227653,0.010347463,0.0008382208,0.21102853,0.005119772,0.000045180128,0.00008243625,0.000042463005,0.049730714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985393,0.003194823,0.00051781384,0.0012074695,0.0057099303,0.0039770515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98482186,0.00841021,0.0014582424,0.00093517016,0.0033518584,0.0010226642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008708655,0.00038023505,0.0007102939,0.0019287311,0.009050974,0.012154021,0.0028296812,0.02333066,0.008917509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030053807,0.00033225882,0.00070803525,0.0018694754,0.039481618,0.006415431,0.004175967,0.015461085,0.0008330402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132925215,0.000011561086,0.00080288656,0.000062809886,0.000011887759,0.00038406634,0.00449575,0.000070090675,0.000033836954,0.9642812,0.021235771,0.008596892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033533906,0.00005353273,0.0047965683,0.0023317928,0.00009802319,0.0012814401,0.013837961,0.00037697956,0.00055216224,0.40173122,0.57481074,0.00009599772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34285295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39292136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34285295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021855503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034104414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68171465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935949159","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199589111.003.0002","title":"The Legal Right to Security of Person","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Meaning (existential); Human rights; Charter; Law; Fundamental rights; Convention; Politics; Right to property; Context (archaeology); Original meaning; International human rights law; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035008710131329744,"score_gpt":0.30386989609369086,"score_spread":0.26886118596236114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935949159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023914364,0.0079399785,0.004683612,0.021889063,0.00049357116,0.0000325355,0.00012890923,0.000021827394,0.96241903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5938563,0.02198448,0.008484082,0.02469691,0.0016417,0.00034078897,0.00037428917,0.000096421325,0.34852502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502975,0.0021061553,0.0001854528,0.0005831703,0.0016105789,0.0004849491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971233,0.0016763586,0.0001498606,0.0003424755,0.0005413863,0.00016658078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039933417,0.00034790175,0.0006302777,0.0015282066,0.00394497,0.0077146087,0.0011648512,0.005481858,0.011943989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053375065,0.00028806654,0.0003348655,0.0011645395,0.03692697,0.006145709,0.004364582,0.0073156934,0.002552194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011034833,0.0000017881093,0.000019915762,0.000011177293,5.39292e-7,0.000010071107,0.00046511338,0.000018742809,0.000021141102,0.9951675,0.0025726906,0.0017102195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043996383,0.000009647976,0.00019488919,0.0006005905,0.0000046078408,0.00010906404,0.0007987172,0.00007948727,0.00015430345,0.74621415,0.25182047,0.000009754408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009820011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008266483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011943989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004351981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075963195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03995663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940409106","doi":"","title":"Smart Devices in Criminal Investigations: How Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Can Better Protect Privacy in the Search of Technology and Seizure of Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; Certainty; Search and seizure; Data Protection Act 1998; Criminal law; Computer security; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Criminal investigation; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.018183162111168143,"score_gpt":0.2550223109746564,"score_spread":0.23683914886348825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940409106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05675424,0.00867419,0.017330185,0.22316583,0.0007207191,0.00022069036,0.00032113199,0.00007582839,0.6927372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92718333,0.007900917,0.009920394,0.02504664,0.00023647588,0.0001061811,0.00013849576,0.000050852705,0.029416712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734239,0.0077472124,0.00080773083,0.0019516323,0.0114560155,0.004613405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780017,0.012238901,0.0016892696,0.0013773399,0.005314955,0.0013779404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020515768,0.0004982962,0.0006214023,0.0044730124,0.02057161,0.024119021,0.002737429,0.009009038,0.0046607517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0362056,0.0006819756,0.0009684298,0.00358253,0.055396646,0.013534632,0.008968333,0.010688866,0.0005533503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011260311,0.000009624219,0.0018271809,0.000042273976,0.000005745404,0.00014546774,0.007335912,0.0002582694,0.00007114781,0.9748173,0.005937172,0.009538597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046578185,0.00006601295,0.015299711,0.00188733,0.00008949944,0.00037991145,0.028650051,0.0018416111,0.0010952731,0.54736066,0.40304223,0.00024118456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8459478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90244687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1540522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052061398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14364353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37773365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940804553","doi":"","title":"‘Rescuing the Canadian Unconscionability Doctrine? Reflections on the Court’s “Applicable Principles” in Downer v. Pitcher’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07203743871741729,"score_gpt":0.29795892631618487,"score_spread":0.22592148759876757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940804553","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010090648,0.0072920574,0.0027577102,0.74070644,0.0028922202,0.00011590524,0.00035584584,0.00007636957,0.23571281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29864848,0.0041037807,0.005188001,0.5829485,0.0025264015,0.00021019964,0.00019613231,0.00020644582,0.105972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716799,0.005197809,0.0012117495,0.00268011,0.012580936,0.006649576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97767115,0.012415493,0.00056432415,0.00076969253,0.0072733024,0.0013060736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024329668,0.0008296624,0.0011027309,0.0021761856,0.026511986,0.01962034,0.010843532,0.04955364,0.00625556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055543296,0.0012365439,0.0014953207,0.003402648,0.033754792,0.008918892,0.0051954743,0.036971655,0.0008746035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002079261,0.000013654526,0.00026072576,0.000048427188,0.00001157559,0.00025416634,0.006909237,0.00024201564,0.00019603064,0.7869563,0.19988537,0.005201743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011617617,0.000021764394,0.0029278998,0.00047188968,0.00007323457,0.00016509459,0.0061914045,0.0008778947,0.0009968596,0.22318909,0.7646295,0.00033926207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95932037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97175086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073526464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073526464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15179554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940991144","doi":"10.7202/1058625ar","title":"Présence et omniprésence de la notion d’atteinte initiale dans l’arrêt Montréal (Ville) c Dorval de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008378027274041733,"score_gpt":0.25693390506199115,"score_spread":0.2485558777879494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940991144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18638253,0.01814499,0.008424185,0.07832762,0.001430037,0.00008523031,0.0003222641,0.00011559374,0.70676756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87876976,0.003620468,0.00095073256,0.0023382946,0.00011296858,0.000027249816,0.00005551217,0.00008551674,0.1140396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621165,0.001071204,0.000056881854,0.0005298183,0.0011415592,0.0009888158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694735,0.0008108138,0.00020142325,0.00013722347,0.0011817083,0.0007215035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022926063,0.00043490794,0.00033804338,0.0012623192,0.015422511,0.011416046,0.0011494774,0.0022438616,0.009423119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004436938,0.00036984516,0.0003454781,0.0014729713,0.029628394,0.0027792885,0.003542239,0.00528399,0.0006229788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038723894,0.000015202013,0.0034544496,0.000056459976,0.000011726095,0.0003347444,0.07364917,0.00023393153,0.00049605075,0.8846534,0.021876087,0.015180066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013216564,0.000032642816,0.021137513,0.00047779505,0.000026972155,0.00027657388,0.07666396,0.0005859767,0.0007871609,0.027434058,0.87240994,0.00015419058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97307533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09226151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09226151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06097244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66940725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941922000","doi":"","title":"APPROPRIATE LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION FOR INFRINGEMENTS OF ABORIGINAL TITLE IN CANADA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03954718599351613,"score_gpt":0.3739969426043751,"score_spread":0.33444975661085896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941922000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033139247,0.008166943,0.031171296,0.12284651,0.0017955748,0.0013996345,0.0019126311,0.00033338877,0.7992348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5928683,0.011496092,0.09477196,0.036281466,0.0007980124,0.0008977529,0.00093265926,0.00019116896,0.26176265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663872,0.003680945,0.002500169,0.0018901562,0.020432374,0.005109241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96746206,0.00678094,0.0015302143,0.0017888141,0.0207489,0.0016891712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015600554,0.00052715547,0.000983685,0.0034987521,0.015072416,0.015337742,0.0051872074,0.007414463,0.008041844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043870103,0.001048302,0.0009935143,0.0032408196,0.012916478,0.003998852,0.003905851,0.0083110295,0.0012943094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019949357,0.00004012658,0.0022901255,0.00016924205,0.000017574195,0.00035535605,0.0049009635,0.0009398526,0.00049575255,0.93593067,0.038550865,0.016289545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064147745,0.00007310102,0.015462203,0.002667011,0.00012011586,0.00046339782,0.008611619,0.0041317404,0.0021869072,0.14933538,0.81646746,0.00041690233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9553032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9681786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09095369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09095369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30279046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6599183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942641253","doi":"10.7202/1058346ar","title":"L’article 7 de la Charte canadienne et la discipline carcérale","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Administration of justice; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.014000138434191126,"score_gpt":0.2912391789809407,"score_spread":0.2772390405467496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942641253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013101521,0.008272933,0.00473498,0.044462595,0.002868306,0.00008704983,0.00023859744,0.000070235474,0.9261638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28480345,0.006329742,0.0032688945,0.023411417,0.0015527448,0.00020205013,0.00033437056,0.00012972981,0.6799675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354655,0.0014060999,0.0001789559,0.0007904734,0.0024917286,0.0015861283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490005,0.0017536207,0.0003949304,0.00047168633,0.0017889618,0.00069078116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030208258,0.000498386,0.00035815776,0.001696626,0.008270319,0.009991703,0.0011479192,0.0057501043,0.021034107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008443602,0.00036931105,0.0007882471,0.0022423698,0.01134079,0.0031301915,0.0032792075,0.008477881,0.0026834386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013694911,0.000017876628,0.00091087207,0.00005141705,0.000005118903,0.0000974427,0.004375176,0.00016296434,0.000115654286,0.94509774,0.036923528,0.01222846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007356115,0.000017470013,0.0033616403,0.00021073753,0.00000806227,0.000088546854,0.0017105911,0.000112540285,0.00025401503,0.03018609,0.96401393,0.00002901146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40632302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5429351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.593677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024824284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033867035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8079159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942719136","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1337","title":"Caron, Carter, and Bedford at the Supreme Court of Canada: Society Can Change But History Will Always Stay the Same","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional court; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06991777902156548,"score_gpt":0.28270529773256386,"score_spread":0.21278751871099838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942719136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00909923,0.054267388,0.0015208737,0.83918786,0.007651472,0.00012286723,0.000677932,0.000059098136,0.08741322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1925503,0.030713167,0.00385111,0.6388963,0.0025428203,0.00016587674,0.00032587012,0.00012223591,0.13083234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945431,0.0009980189,0.00017210646,0.0005357694,0.0027631002,0.0009878471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993786,0.002661083,0.00018098122,0.00013585035,0.0024946597,0.00074133265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046181697,0.0006988964,0.0007530546,0.0012777306,0.028202266,0.011025814,0.002349251,0.015364223,0.0051744767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013115332,0.00060051604,0.0005935302,0.0025215347,0.012987539,0.0047454657,0.0022177536,0.021226013,0.00075159996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028434966,0.000019120505,0.0011657602,0.000092078175,0.000023970322,0.00028199318,0.008714146,0.00011329017,0.000217655,0.26562443,0.70980906,0.013909988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003537353,0.000014445619,0.004356178,0.0006596138,0.00005322953,0.00012399795,0.01001269,0.00017786311,0.00055134617,0.045265507,0.9386084,0.00014152289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93190175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9793211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06809825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04151326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078871965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30120122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942808126","doi":"10.7202/1057115ar","title":"Change of Terminology? Change of Law?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Civil code; Law; Law and economics; Extension (predicate logic); Terminology; Political science; Code (set theory); Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0814592853559841,"score_gpt":0.31640734734720216,"score_spread":0.23494806199121807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942808126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027289032,0.029877411,0.007855685,0.8187644,0.033227023,0.000060667793,0.00035702653,0.00023040509,0.10689851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27147534,0.032451704,0.016694585,0.4555949,0.026148006,0.00029841944,0.0008845444,0.0008391983,0.19561338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704306,0.010500758,0.001338135,0.0037235452,0.009589865,0.0044170287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555527,0.010484962,0.0018071388,0.0047694794,0.024897499,0.0024881405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02547397,0.00089379516,0.0016769257,0.003930364,0.007521245,0.014444845,0.0074241585,0.010296194,0.014227681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05618139,0.0004853591,0.0010068676,0.0055354848,0.047293715,0.013402753,0.0032164964,0.017191608,0.0048499852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023578605,0.000019780562,0.00038727114,0.00015244276,0.000010251984,0.00010012393,0.0038802347,0.000118151926,0.00024462346,0.7319393,0.2306458,0.032478437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013617387,0.00001497787,0.0012145936,0.0006478043,0.000013080671,0.00015796722,0.00400906,0.0002620312,0.00019388802,0.06478733,0.9286222,0.0000635277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8341112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7473911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8341112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08147502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07663047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5911454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943076925","doi":"10.7202/1058324ar","title":"Daigle : un oubli des questions de droit civil et constitutionnel ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030078089540344504,"score_gpt":0.2908784442393147,"score_spread":0.26080035469897017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943076925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010590427,0.06440905,0.0035298576,0.868047,0.0036507575,0.000019984067,0.00011764155,0.000020612924,0.049614776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5786216,0.08111916,0.0063342336,0.26728374,0.009950704,0.00011465188,0.00021321049,0.00015563313,0.056207094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921731,0.004146816,0.00035479284,0.0011913343,0.0015081939,0.00062582275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97429556,0.01948288,0.0013063188,0.0011156283,0.0028809442,0.0009186058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011514243,0.0004555273,0.0010334379,0.0027376122,0.0061678668,0.0132081285,0.0020077599,0.010073864,0.008736948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036489323,0.0003221308,0.00058072817,0.0024138535,0.025767185,0.021083295,0.006030703,0.011319611,0.001147696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067046945,0.000025734573,0.0018899156,0.00028980954,0.000023430879,0.00038044335,0.016964544,0.00010848938,0.00014561592,0.8660169,0.08120329,0.032884814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022426808,0.000037152357,0.004120966,0.0015224906,0.000024020697,0.00053110585,0.029901996,0.00029043527,0.00036485176,0.5016428,0.46148428,0.000057453646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022847075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035215486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022847075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006499132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060893893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943113700","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1348","title":"A Withering Instrumentality: The Negative Implications of R. v. Safarzadeh-Markali and other Recent Section 7 Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Parliament; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.09600120144211084,"score_gpt":0.39102804646399125,"score_spread":0.2950268450218804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943113700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021507192,0.014234959,0.0025877873,0.7196908,0.0013572989,0.000041125717,0.00018615373,0.000045054698,0.2403497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5956236,0.010670889,0.0023379046,0.3510534,0.0021156427,0.000048344806,0.00009436764,0.00007632619,0.037979543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98816305,0.0027428754,0.0003091526,0.0014913701,0.0056576882,0.0016358165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97175264,0.017413726,0.0015313129,0.0010467983,0.0071391435,0.0011163569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0174354,0.00040939084,0.00067226926,0.0018989271,0.0129035525,0.009854731,0.0034067172,0.012009704,0.0040402873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031956848,0.00041315833,0.00064806314,0.00211372,0.035149973,0.0050938535,0.002573404,0.018555433,0.00068447203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022644526,0.000016954988,0.0009657778,0.00006181199,0.00002153192,0.00023564254,0.0037567276,0.00009268429,0.00014834332,0.9415124,0.04307798,0.010087474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011865284,0.00004988061,0.008815466,0.00076453347,0.0001726624,0.00041133224,0.008964727,0.00049436046,0.001292031,0.39207223,0.58671254,0.00013163516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49538103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6406783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49538103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02259088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046815954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943115346","doi":"10.7202/1058122ar","title":"En relisant Ross c. Dunstall","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Rite; Philosophy; Obligation; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.01867795514089262,"score_gpt":0.27685526283479844,"score_spread":0.25817730769390584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943115346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024604884,0.02864474,0.0012262837,0.81987745,0.015629847,0.00003260018,0.00016738517,0.000073125026,0.13188814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07083304,0.016662322,0.0017666824,0.29241803,0.0057705985,0.000069470254,0.00013133294,0.00018808736,0.6121604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971661,0.00057107623,0.00008298993,0.0007092875,0.0011067275,0.00036388473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963366,0.0015079172,0.00015280618,0.0001591121,0.0013786936,0.0004648347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020882615,0.00054599927,0.00056991226,0.00070377655,0.007459599,0.008461351,0.0012572729,0.0076132333,0.020248558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010836896,0.0003147961,0.00036283818,0.0007487308,0.007139746,0.005238605,0.0018117152,0.011762263,0.0041017323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042581116,0.000015809816,0.00059012807,0.000100955775,0.000011691908,0.00013881487,0.0023506277,0.00006559408,0.00022754469,0.25554642,0.7267996,0.014110131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005378558,0.000005978145,0.0004823596,0.00016011877,0.0000051334946,0.00006440095,0.0013380459,0.0000620696,0.00017066741,0.013099984,0.9845836,0.000022168691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27723083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46911114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27723083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010594773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012772733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55123436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943129660","doi":"10.7202/1058322ar","title":"Les troubles de jouissance et les atteintes aux droits d’autrui résultant de travaux publics non fautifs","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Publics; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0386731860621237,"score_gpt":0.3135820500437,"score_spread":0.27490886398157627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943129660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6760622,0.0052293073,0.003317412,0.049326554,0.0005729539,0.00008510196,0.00021362702,0.00008638806,0.26510644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231918,0.001939624,0.00058606185,0.0034644937,0.00007945622,0.000045118402,0.00006832123,0.000045800167,0.07057935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921548,0.0028430722,0.00021587007,0.0006678984,0.0020477315,0.002070791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902081,0.0029299718,0.0022390268,0.0007748696,0.0026664431,0.0011815875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049800836,0.00040249483,0.0004601039,0.0019938536,0.016161885,0.007386343,0.0014508249,0.002766179,0.017362025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015883693,0.00050380285,0.00042446965,0.0017553271,0.014771391,0.003754734,0.004771147,0.005011197,0.0022011076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010580136,0.00012044732,0.053628106,0.00035824237,0.0001053955,0.005960949,0.6407919,0.00027081594,0.001778735,0.16988331,0.035631865,0.09136443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017648119,0.00009053143,0.110151246,0.00088853197,0.000071473645,0.0025546902,0.4294226,0.00037254437,0.0013722772,0.0142679475,0.44064653,0.00014405271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43052787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6748795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43052787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015468394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017693633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943588959","doi":"10.7202/1057476ar","title":"Le nouveau droit de la preuve en matières civiles selon le Code civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.009841112205534169,"score_gpt":0.24603345880473976,"score_spread":0.2361923465992056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943588959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29781058,0.005137251,0.011126058,0.021602476,0.00059489947,0.00016949349,0.0007146866,0.000119276076,0.66272527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7839303,0.0016587533,0.002516919,0.0015579561,0.000052263207,0.000059361915,0.0001496961,0.0000552119,0.2100195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972223,0.00046663836,0.000059537313,0.00027938036,0.0012188667,0.00075329683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957897,0.0007706836,0.0002768674,0.00024891095,0.002377713,0.00053616427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016988721,0.000365806,0.0002458425,0.0014816872,0.01253683,0.007386022,0.00078422413,0.0016151468,0.015353644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055354927,0.00027218237,0.00036857786,0.001823552,0.007292884,0.0019347362,0.0017345473,0.0031497441,0.0009186026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070374364,0.000041924064,0.028948398,0.00018060305,0.00003307351,0.0007363522,0.07102584,0.0017616889,0.0016717027,0.7784595,0.032325763,0.08474469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012587647,0.000070467126,0.11290874,0.00071348477,0.00004450447,0.00029465396,0.0520333,0.0013510984,0.0014852372,0.019480506,0.8114648,0.00014057803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9501067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060794283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060794283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068796456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4410954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943743192","doi":"10.7202/1058221ar","title":"La décision de la Cour suprême dans l’affaire Mahé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015253848435101152,"score_gpt":0.28818842059722916,"score_spread":0.272934572162128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943743192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15379882,0.006597448,0.014384372,0.05759538,0.003929539,0.0010510662,0.0008422775,0.0002281584,0.76157296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6744587,0.001694062,0.0073945588,0.018945832,0.0006648156,0.00029996742,0.00019945543,0.00010292349,0.29623973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797717,0.0025760494,0.0004816022,0.002242037,0.007903807,0.007024883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914113,0.0036429951,0.00022522542,0.00043585186,0.0030832058,0.0012013793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009083646,0.00065390626,0.0012333174,0.0015217925,0.016623005,0.010643469,0.0025452138,0.010084835,0.015742585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018311277,0.000782879,0.0015163803,0.0011424653,0.008340261,0.0026711025,0.0051710443,0.012891691,0.0011981723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000255079,0.000095781514,0.0037074457,0.00021133244,0.00010671889,0.0009563698,0.006384055,0.0016393452,0.002335636,0.91182256,0.037094917,0.035390824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028880002,0.00039778306,0.01897078,0.0007453786,0.00034677424,0.00037542576,0.0070337337,0.0027847916,0.008120394,0.06342676,0.89715064,0.0003587387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7990106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89508075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7990106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04326161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09635552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40434617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944015268","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1340","title":"R. v. Nur: A Positive Step but not the Solution to the Problem of Mandatory Minimums in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Conviction; Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Sentence; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0335330232733288,"score_gpt":0.29734338735551935,"score_spread":0.26381036408219055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944015268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078892864,0.014849712,0.0058888737,0.67238855,0.0029931935,0.00025908588,0.0008327547,0.00028631132,0.22360867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58333826,0.009985389,0.01350166,0.31722978,0.0010570261,0.00012699304,0.00038545544,0.0001662221,0.07420929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913059,0.0007155953,0.00037382529,0.0009293208,0.0040570395,0.002618445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855269,0.0034094253,0.00060312473,0.00046153655,0.0067826184,0.0032163358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007132871,0.00039977639,0.0007392281,0.0013697611,0.013778404,0.006920063,0.0037197517,0.008458043,0.0035419145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020301508,0.0006476334,0.00076582085,0.001374991,0.006021455,0.0028647387,0.0028673045,0.013702361,0.0003781821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009099821,0.00008370846,0.009096899,0.00032455745,0.00008408306,0.0017618206,0.0036586681,0.0009980651,0.0023735364,0.639007,0.2716032,0.07091753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001812289,0.00025123902,0.032601003,0.0013908686,0.00031767224,0.0009906375,0.0067199185,0.002742902,0.0038445105,0.07949522,0.8709842,0.00048065593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97952604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99479103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061317682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061317682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28036717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.444893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944601930","doi":"10.29173/mlj991","title":"Bargaining for Justice: The Road towards Prosecutorial Accountability in the Plea Bargaining Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Discretion; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Economics","score_opus":0.1151852980119802,"score_gpt":0.415100337242644,"score_spread":0.2999150392306638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944601930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022278065,0.0053464132,0.37860477,0.12669235,0.0010257156,0.00025774664,0.000097731856,0.0003256899,0.46537155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8986874,0.0025692007,0.05673958,0.014414626,0.0009859696,0.00034082241,0.000081865735,0.0002671561,0.025913382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8916858,0.06609463,0.0027200675,0.008488748,0.022254586,0.008756172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9021582,0.064927265,0.0060303877,0.011284938,0.01220433,0.0033949704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09272744,0.0009945816,0.0012166962,0.0035564343,0.015269299,0.024740485,0.004667308,0.011458131,0.009053201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15443759,0.0010681887,0.0010785214,0.0041841567,0.0634515,0.025565045,0.014461093,0.016388068,0.001674601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008887456,0.000005306583,0.0002046438,0.000015365522,0.0000032053233,0.00002316883,0.0025979988,0.00034841587,0.00004253252,0.98800683,0.001289557,0.0074540256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021290005,0.000017272621,0.00066951645,0.00025259118,0.000012718446,0.000041932166,0.0016630964,0.0023018308,0.00029994946,0.9357087,0.058963828,0.00004730192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10106974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068622276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89893025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03193944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047826186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49039543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945873252","doi":"","title":"National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: past, present and future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislator; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; National security; Counter terrorism; Law; Work (physics); Public administration; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015302049352184419,"score_gpt":0.29744126424473827,"score_spread":0.28213921489255384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945873252","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14861864,0.35341483,0.0009208704,0.32212362,0.0016408777,0.00009088676,0.0031729257,0.00006520993,0.16995214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6937245,0.2648129,0.0019150992,0.017682804,0.00042038067,0.000045240628,0.00093890855,0.000035480058,0.02042472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959175,0.0004781388,0.00013042039,0.00025789693,0.0017481744,0.0014678494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865368,0.002910544,0.001195184,0.00020219843,0.007364923,0.0017903071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030718208,0.00045714917,0.00067210617,0.005729149,0.0117988065,0.008756776,0.0016122313,0.0021128734,0.007439301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010928486,0.00033773723,0.00057365076,0.014028893,0.0080936765,0.0031330436,0.0027307668,0.0032150901,0.00027302004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030085564,0.00014893191,0.092946924,0.0054032267,0.00027538932,0.0012132745,0.03340978,0.0022548363,0.00052583386,0.36657614,0.18170822,0.31523666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004416936,0.000075784366,0.1879031,0.007813244,0.0003253366,0.00036716906,0.097154684,0.0011338438,0.0007721672,0.0291302,0.6750058,0.000274613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24840444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24840444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34830946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87174433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945995780","doi":"","title":"The power of persuasion : the politics of the new right in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Black Rose Books","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.0318731851168803,"score_gpt":0.29019189004054613,"score_spread":0.2583187049236658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945995780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02092698,0.0048959465,0.0010437774,0.08278185,0.00031109282,0.00004747914,0.000112577545,0.00001956342,0.8898607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4914678,0.003585792,0.0008857823,0.0065237014,0.0001747587,0.00006357162,0.000041296444,0.000080550584,0.49717683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995116,0.0010109298,0.00010040804,0.00044373333,0.0017027007,0.0016263141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539703,0.0021654018,0.00022029699,0.00024431347,0.0011021764,0.00087081554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031582892,0.0003585773,0.00047686146,0.0010925116,0.031588633,0.013235409,0.0013642255,0.0058223554,0.020575987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008762482,0.0007094266,0.00031670823,0.002107959,0.02644448,0.005767127,0.00386653,0.0064970907,0.0012957933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029525974,0.000011750783,0.0010206498,0.000046815734,0.0000064410965,0.00018577624,0.033628806,0.00014109853,0.00009939619,0.9000078,0.049959876,0.014861957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036932295,0.00001561956,0.006028098,0.0002590489,0.000024767518,0.000105006926,0.027327675,0.00047370046,0.0002446246,0.20636483,0.7590602,0.000059583967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97124845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10537504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10537504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1255521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76455295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946096329","doi":"","title":"Les procédures d'urgence devant le juge de l'Administration au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04922682452168812,"score_gpt":0.3089659430221098,"score_spread":0.25973911850042164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946096329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57347316,0.0081254495,0.06375979,0.04723102,0.0017070813,0.003412727,0.0038972741,0.0021135318,0.29627994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7249358,0.0032794105,0.027967442,0.0038288177,0.00020659021,0.0010450863,0.00090878113,0.00025179255,0.2375762],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859817,0.004659231,0.0009363255,0.0012200661,0.004399803,0.0028029224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722724,0.012641843,0.0011551575,0.0018308247,0.010107149,0.0019924946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011377156,0.0008521915,0.0005807738,0.003125942,0.010738637,0.0060460605,0.0018768241,0.0041210535,0.018302305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03954098,0.0007482144,0.0009986212,0.0021949168,0.0038327782,0.0018358941,0.0018904554,0.0049316892,0.0027498612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080276746,0.0008505701,0.08448558,0.00096685794,0.00019120332,0.002869348,0.029732235,0.009548942,0.01072037,0.14453657,0.1086824,0.6066133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025591673,0.00079713995,0.41475543,0.001624025,0.00021547043,0.00095788063,0.023974802,0.009263954,0.011431686,0.009279889,0.52691936,0.00052454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9419249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9392391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05807507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043802008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12071457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31780732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946648245","doi":"10.7202/1070286ar","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt’s Literary Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.13267640555325838,"score_gpt":0.3690378664706056,"score_spread":0.23636146091734722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946648245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474949,0.005282845,0.0029575634,0.12490142,0.0025948093,0.00026792692,0.000097938464,0.00009898139,0.3163036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315285,0.0018479202,0.0011317395,0.025557645,0.0012038966,0.00014098333,0.000040500632,0.00020263607,0.0383462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97121227,0.015381742,0.000838932,0.0025657467,0.005929635,0.0040717116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611871,0.028510354,0.0020535234,0.00095115876,0.003192021,0.004105795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015042932,0.0010485112,0.001155614,0.0055621234,0.07246704,0.0253062,0.0043713404,0.015168727,0.0077979965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053638767,0.0009644065,0.0010176764,0.0052034557,0.028402472,0.010828118,0.016940298,0.020403832,0.0012156409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025901705,0.00008051419,0.0014111141,0.000077485594,0.000009178404,0.017183883,0.89915574,0.0000507665,0.00044351578,0.0561168,0.019024244,0.0064208847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014719684,0.00003592721,0.0016310549,0.00034687063,0.000016160924,0.0033393586,0.7721323,0.00021478943,0.00040894002,0.0076433285,0.21415456,0.000062121006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05005175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10488929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07246704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018577985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008846222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13479334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946861318","doi":"10.7202/1059326ar","title":"La compétence globale de l’arbitre de griefs et l’erreur juridictionnelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01914906466047106,"score_gpt":0.2830613906821091,"score_spread":0.26391232602163806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946861318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043267008,0.0073606377,0.013610858,0.08593763,0.00043849612,0.000089970505,0.00024373164,0.000074509255,0.8489772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7578346,0.0039705173,0.0046484484,0.007872731,0.00027538082,0.00007290672,0.0001516222,0.000077119264,0.22509661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921599,0.0016050134,0.0001928844,0.0010911353,0.0027181108,0.002232893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029,0.0019372306,0.0006584618,0.00067459804,0.00434106,0.0020985869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009418496,0.00046988422,0.000644828,0.0016719183,0.0105862,0.017111916,0.0013207978,0.00396831,0.017518623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009328939,0.000383627,0.00051614706,0.0013297107,0.02254139,0.0063789813,0.0061267866,0.0064308443,0.0015393157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014888192,0.000011955003,0.0022223266,0.00006360778,0.000011173553,0.00006759361,0.0071666087,0.0003171751,0.0002874651,0.96312743,0.0104490705,0.016260687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002936604,0.00004469275,0.019538794,0.0006883914,0.000035229034,0.00017563038,0.014218282,0.00082291383,0.0011482812,0.18837292,0.7748235,0.000102068356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6327571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78874993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6327571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04039413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07330537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73881125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946873475","doi":"10.29173/alr2564","title":"Instrumental Rationality and General Deterrence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Office of National Drug Control Policy","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Rationality; Charter; Deterrence (psychology); Law; Deterrence theory; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027501699175308085,"score_gpt":0.33839006818190687,"score_spread":0.3108883690065988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946873475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054576095,0.041962434,0.03226956,0.050708316,0.00045550396,0.00022205482,0.0002745418,0.00009354597,0.8194379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93238413,0.008516806,0.004551958,0.012021501,0.00019792347,0.00009450837,0.000091174115,0.000022600818,0.042119347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98948294,0.0024511537,0.00029972577,0.0009911403,0.004017678,0.0027573453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544287,0.002153693,0.0004008456,0.00040411702,0.0013244386,0.00027402508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007611241,0.00055236835,0.00066697143,0.002312526,0.003675026,0.0054320134,0.0019258086,0.0039125723,0.002822641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009075336,0.00039026406,0.0008514711,0.001297963,0.025831135,0.0023229118,0.0026316203,0.005037552,0.000309729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004375679,0.0000050809763,0.00019350262,0.000030208805,0.000007790031,0.000034850393,0.00017580314,0.00032745206,0.000054699616,0.9947279,0.0013630799,0.0030752842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005039661,0.00003687784,0.003953718,0.0003616054,0.00005001725,0.00008956356,0.00049762375,0.0013930234,0.00074715784,0.88471013,0.10805572,0.000054211723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35788536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38744935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35788536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022356395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03493113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7116045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946938629","doi":"10.7202/1058582ar","title":"La vérité et la liberté d’expression","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017289728657490584,"score_gpt":0.29124787502063976,"score_spread":0.2739581463631492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946938629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02491001,0.015608637,0.023162933,0.13809243,0.001585652,0.0001502873,0.00030733345,0.00010477586,0.79607797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74355173,0.0075742514,0.0072025647,0.02438746,0.0006277332,0.00018614344,0.00016124942,0.00011942447,0.21618941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862091,0.0032233354,0.00047473566,0.0014270642,0.005609601,0.0030560975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993339,0.003026447,0.0005478787,0.0005908905,0.0020319312,0.00046389963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007424907,0.0005656718,0.00079920655,0.0015323346,0.013176278,0.015867133,0.0029824276,0.008201796,0.013451357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013919314,0.00045284478,0.0007671374,0.0017892248,0.048630133,0.008117215,0.006637355,0.011648206,0.0015408276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006790403,0.0000039524907,0.00019523209,0.00003801912,0.0000038909607,0.000050545532,0.006617005,0.000049000642,0.0000648154,0.98499924,0.0037259883,0.004245532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031814485,0.000031873704,0.0036776932,0.0008267632,0.000036716126,0.00037079534,0.013157424,0.00048390913,0.0009445629,0.26300156,0.7173419,0.00009492672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6681204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6832928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6681204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037535027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059899945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6676682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947096386","doi":"10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9101","title":"Extradition and trial delays: recent developments (and lessons?) from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Charter; Law; Paragraph; Political science; Odds; Human rights; State (computer science); Medicine","score_opus":0.06710911780850506,"score_gpt":0.30087391331984226,"score_spread":0.2337647955113372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947096386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07362984,0.32184595,0.0015921603,0.41564128,0.0029406862,0.00013365544,0.0023670872,0.00008568693,0.18176362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5223419,0.39110568,0.0029320414,0.056417722,0.0013733103,0.00006300152,0.0013849699,0.00012363459,0.02425781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909367,0.0008004361,0.00055741484,0.00088083034,0.004767199,0.0020574257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94515425,0.016984487,0.003681903,0.0010570505,0.026219077,0.0069032456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087811295,0.00048585027,0.0010610052,0.0050067627,0.009935433,0.012738332,0.003634382,0.0038612795,0.00908217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028399456,0.0006676055,0.00083743583,0.014943842,0.010914536,0.0032373602,0.0034417456,0.007226586,0.00044242025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003591454,0.00022265334,0.036326595,0.004248758,0.00015011212,0.0018956169,0.019300468,0.0025104203,0.00050218287,0.28207767,0.21073438,0.44167203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007162204,0.00011048242,0.101366594,0.0073837354,0.0002941156,0.00087671896,0.0323887,0.0010697234,0.00073051907,0.015865041,0.8394231,0.000419595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99519426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18509819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18509819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35063016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947166640","doi":"10.7202/1058578ar","title":"Le recours collectif au Québec et aux États-Unis","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02878305176646637,"score_gpt":0.2939045417073459,"score_spread":0.26512148994087953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947166640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44709828,0.023708744,0.0038304813,0.025956964,0.00061536435,0.00018642344,0.00565373,0.00013356222,0.49281645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85079604,0.005863109,0.0011159364,0.0020027559,0.00006879568,0.0000780787,0.0010029301,0.000032675747,0.13903981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978483,0.0003468129,0.00007127022,0.00034993154,0.00074339606,0.0006402379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928323,0.0013595938,0.0007539276,0.00027685316,0.003994131,0.000783191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016444519,0.0003666193,0.0004928074,0.0033115898,0.0096817035,0.004541048,0.00097074755,0.0010307904,0.019470768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005788369,0.00025866897,0.00034869366,0.005887696,0.0030612173,0.0017376421,0.0015165125,0.0018652333,0.0007978361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002932116,0.00017110792,0.19968621,0.0010403992,0.00028527115,0.0014476761,0.05868211,0.001626213,0.001438562,0.3495031,0.10310437,0.28272173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026153168,0.00007436339,0.5307543,0.0009591924,0.000106881875,0.00025033305,0.026107823,0.0007129241,0.000880191,0.0050783106,0.43494835,0.00010120965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99663407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05549138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05549138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06489755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40262002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947206550","doi":"10.7202/1059258ar","title":"À propos de l’affaire Vérificateur général du Canada : commentaires sur les documents du cabinet et la protection de leur caractère confidentiel par convention constitutionnelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Convention; Cabinet (room); Physics; Philosophy; Art; Law","score_opus":0.017508954320837582,"score_gpt":0.249051279445782,"score_spread":0.23154232512494444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947206550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025052097,0.01459273,0.006957432,0.7514024,0.0059710857,0.00019228467,0.00091758126,0.00018834503,0.19472603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46791965,0.00995748,0.0128580155,0.29628786,0.0019166914,0.000221694,0.00052237674,0.0002879344,0.21002837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713031,0.003942195,0.0012423444,0.002990487,0.015404166,0.005117733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94575804,0.0201431,0.0015145971,0.0022245331,0.026615066,0.0037446944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022742698,0.00068281614,0.0009150334,0.0026908005,0.026009763,0.021854367,0.005121141,0.022068089,0.0075569227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053185724,0.0009470288,0.001096068,0.0033262214,0.019631332,0.0064187995,0.0047470806,0.027236193,0.0007683369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006266518,0.000032455875,0.0027184898,0.00020430374,0.00005085852,0.0006277869,0.013721431,0.00039274417,0.0006482387,0.70937634,0.25371444,0.01845021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058552698,0.000022687966,0.005496354,0.0007025446,0.00009884373,0.00016214707,0.0076127774,0.0007491608,0.0013780397,0.038693607,0.9448491,0.00017621557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98001236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89793193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10206808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27683872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7405592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947210133","doi":"10.7202/1059296ar","title":"Le nouveau mandat d’enquête créé par la Loi sur le Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012519541661640692,"score_gpt":0.2255168654966934,"score_spread":0.2129973238350527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947210133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09531152,0.020005893,0.008695136,0.2979905,0.00651635,0.00041122272,0.001104808,0.0002285109,0.569736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40840915,0.005410268,0.004239078,0.05183968,0.0008721543,0.0003881942,0.00031489704,0.00017464125,0.5283519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575735,0.0023914732,0.0004701793,0.0013983317,0.0054907603,0.004491926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877906,0.0042947554,0.00077086687,0.00055065344,0.0046115564,0.001981566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008441858,0.00055461493,0.0006006855,0.0015850775,0.019816523,0.007072342,0.0019132056,0.01105289,0.0120284455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01922069,0.0007034021,0.0006670306,0.002058633,0.013800983,0.002830992,0.004969641,0.010567586,0.0025695015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010779608,0.000056760353,0.0056558917,0.00027250632,0.000017563543,0.0006024671,0.043983664,0.00025577468,0.0015403872,0.79338,0.121856496,0.032270577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013908147,0.000038742844,0.012443788,0.00029524064,0.000014601365,0.000117649804,0.006528544,0.00008689949,0.0007698618,0.0062700207,0.9733647,0.000056146724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7651097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8769932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04757401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10190013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47254717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947236643","doi":"10.7202/1059254ar","title":"Expressions incitant à la violence : le droit américain, le droit canadien et l’affaire Dupuis c. La Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Montréal","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.01221494351065762,"score_gpt":0.25879010628338134,"score_spread":0.24657516277272373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947236643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06619434,0.015064514,0.0022279338,0.0600538,0.00088257575,0.00005619701,0.00030576566,0.000060458886,0.8551544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76519424,0.004949295,0.000611537,0.0056289826,0.00022063758,0.000043219985,0.00009079342,0.00006335876,0.22319797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718636,0.0008095597,0.000034169883,0.0002847239,0.0007554098,0.00092978077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877316,0.00030245853,0.00011642812,0.00005012165,0.0004529744,0.00030490456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012058412,0.00063409953,0.0002730497,0.00092836097,0.017911749,0.008527499,0.0014334313,0.0019537255,0.009880358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027847467,0.00029790364,0.00028055182,0.0015797218,0.01941687,0.0018072514,0.0038227602,0.0032365199,0.0006656468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026434434,0.000013511847,0.0031361268,0.00005894555,0.0000163731,0.0004255825,0.069937974,0.00021505117,0.0003075102,0.86419487,0.049894247,0.011773432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016489737,0.000016127013,0.011715942,0.0003320872,0.000037218964,0.00016471671,0.061283585,0.00025134388,0.0005266392,0.021038726,0.9045371,0.00008004953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9586988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08614543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08614543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040346324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62503177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947264233","doi":"10.7202/1059381ar","title":"LA DÉSOBÉISSANCE CIVILE EN CONTEXTE CANADIEN ET CONTEMPORAIN","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019214607826638943,"score_gpt":0.28551222077635774,"score_spread":0.2662976129497188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947264233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33077967,0.01982262,0.0027641153,0.033337068,0.00043490098,0.000048486156,0.00011452034,0.00003499538,0.6126637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96160805,0.0044221203,0.000495232,0.0011639562,0.00008508802,0.000032642325,0.000036316094,0.000023260192,0.032133378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973035,0.0014295217,0.0000462133,0.00032779653,0.00040005834,0.0004928783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809104,0.00093066593,0.00018019292,0.00015454252,0.0002738035,0.00036979956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019083432,0.00042604437,0.00046513372,0.0019075033,0.019958982,0.010474047,0.0013096991,0.0027681473,0.009586892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003700313,0.00023700307,0.00020488164,0.0045128097,0.031549126,0.0040576644,0.006185247,0.0037049993,0.0007130393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002044664,0.000017733271,0.0024474275,0.00009547212,0.00000969378,0.0009052067,0.42168167,0.00022254132,0.00018454825,0.56389457,0.0024054574,0.008115165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007744435,0.000025555551,0.0075684856,0.00059252727,0.00001932411,0.0007201356,0.45605958,0.00018517519,0.00023724642,0.06281244,0.47172174,0.00005007998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3010236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4238389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6989764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016870456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013223464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5985429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947294769","doi":"10.7202/1059281ar","title":"La nouvelle compétence fédérale en matière de poursuite criminelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.020540159330230387,"score_gpt":0.2768219654922177,"score_spread":0.2562818061619873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947294769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17281534,0.0065680724,0.031253636,0.043052122,0.0015158519,0.00035411975,0.0006094147,0.00023172126,0.7435997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8551849,0.0012795669,0.007217522,0.005542107,0.0003762815,0.00023453333,0.00017865429,0.0000588832,0.12992756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99369335,0.0016518995,0.00038969642,0.0011247703,0.0016433517,0.0014968967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495125,0.0019450902,0.0006908253,0.0007003043,0.0012667679,0.00044588145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005536488,0.00029136785,0.00044814192,0.0014249635,0.005998408,0.0047120517,0.0009332609,0.0033963427,0.0059233964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008405391,0.00048597436,0.00070036465,0.0011404059,0.008188781,0.0022686138,0.0032214688,0.005256049,0.0008325633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002890793,0.000023958775,0.0028933142,0.000065147826,0.00001199279,0.00008224366,0.0074348915,0.00020449636,0.0007717877,0.96410257,0.006684182,0.017696522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060229435,0.00020979838,0.049558755,0.0005097668,0.00006755497,0.0004940431,0.004127814,0.0009486202,0.0031445879,0.0978567,0.8428804,0.00014168714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07264729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13694406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07264729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008723457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015942162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14444882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947331614","doi":"10.7202/1059438ar","title":"DE L’IMPACT DE LA CHARTE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS DE LA PERSONNE SUR LE DROIT CIVIL DES CONTRATS ET DE LA RESPONSABILITÉ AU QUÉBEC","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Freedom of expression; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.019669125474096747,"score_gpt":0.3115153637882065,"score_spread":0.2918462383141097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947331614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13519849,0.0043408675,0.0033261608,0.07405115,0.0013055045,0.00011014558,0.002362791,0.00008883409,0.7792161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7870033,0.0021659953,0.0014629422,0.0077588693,0.00014424215,0.000057998324,0.0005613296,0.00006885232,0.20077658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958151,0.00093362905,0.00007659273,0.0003429404,0.0017754167,0.0010563786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029046,0.0016333496,0.0003047811,0.0004035426,0.0063441345,0.0010237088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027472915,0.000340374,0.00031115173,0.0011031233,0.006246413,0.006042276,0.0010063051,0.0018020776,0.024488922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01046156,0.00025754535,0.00053955783,0.0011490975,0.003967217,0.0014001476,0.0014605514,0.0032487449,0.0011063695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002017164,0.00012401788,0.039489962,0.0002539042,0.00011480953,0.000688779,0.011544507,0.0039112857,0.0014865188,0.67956597,0.19378833,0.068830185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000759823,0.00013038106,0.172672,0.0008084114,0.00018800815,0.00015655353,0.015952881,0.0040503205,0.001701501,0.020003032,0.7840749,0.00018600111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05799963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05799963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087872885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4208187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947500724","doi":"10.7202/1058584ar","title":"La vérité et la législation sur la procédure civile en droit québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012898095204174405,"score_gpt":0.27293784835703233,"score_spread":0.26003975315285793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947500724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24324319,0.009276752,0.006427761,0.05302733,0.00093705766,0.0003276106,0.00058709935,0.00013881421,0.68603444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68460613,0.002924361,0.0019295492,0.008830894,0.00012717354,0.0001577873,0.00013587362,0.000049323862,0.30123886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351656,0.0015449281,0.00016432982,0.0006282816,0.0019395229,0.0022064764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994145,0.0025475747,0.00043703278,0.000391325,0.0017923266,0.0006866766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039856834,0.00043488975,0.00032321637,0.0011322966,0.015116637,0.007172354,0.0015246288,0.0051056063,0.01934187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008637855,0.0004916771,0.00040855104,0.001666031,0.009506726,0.0023262536,0.00236834,0.0059302035,0.0010823435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046049896,0.00006028205,0.0056429184,0.00018797666,0.000019533127,0.00081200653,0.050429143,0.000753741,0.001990013,0.8520322,0.04700366,0.041022383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027201153,0.000062716266,0.04643437,0.00062880275,0.000036589438,0.00021931731,0.024139652,0.00087377534,0.0013537067,0.010664206,0.9153902,0.00016952943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98777753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06995717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10008609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5075772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947516013","doi":"10.7202/1059187ar","title":"La vérité et la justice","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.023653906482414517,"score_gpt":0.30921302457960265,"score_spread":0.28555911809718815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947516013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011215685,0.027540274,0.009167709,0.079121865,0.0028075604,0.00005521203,0.0001562694,0.00011699797,0.8698185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6619521,0.015065813,0.0050918767,0.029659012,0.0024784913,0.00012817058,0.00017133151,0.00020405019,0.28524917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883083,0.004534356,0.00035309637,0.0016104188,0.002943104,0.002250648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948486,0.002342974,0.0005530961,0.000702243,0.00089176703,0.0006613321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056530074,0.00063141703,0.0006207246,0.0013532741,0.011089204,0.01677222,0.0011977603,0.008533612,0.0238799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009294584,0.00046724675,0.0006708062,0.0013711818,0.034660026,0.009853181,0.008302777,0.01101901,0.004124701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076261435,0.0000054777665,0.000105493054,0.000029463592,0.0000035560504,0.00005287367,0.0013315639,0.00005668504,0.000051474337,0.98176783,0.008981082,0.0076068197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014760008,0.000033210716,0.00088039855,0.00046087962,0.000011181909,0.00024051158,0.0020379992,0.00020697378,0.00027351666,0.49204704,0.5037562,0.0000373428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01814486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019859899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0238799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008712109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01291638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07988626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947522684","doi":"10.7202/1059298ar","title":"Évolution de la notion de « délai raisonnable » en matière de recours en évocation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0162890948952963,"score_gpt":0.2898395285926688,"score_spread":0.27355043369737253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947522684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27591354,0.00542925,0.025381602,0.04294968,0.0005059129,0.00014186738,0.00037459825,0.00013350575,0.6491701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619684,0.0005614845,0.0025568332,0.0007836892,0.000044210024,0.00002890386,0.000045319848,0.000048753525,0.033962484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500763,0.0016589325,0.00017601665,0.0007016656,0.0015622695,0.0008934748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904654,0.0028806347,0.0009950837,0.0008340084,0.0037417947,0.0010829478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005435451,0.0004026328,0.00043203164,0.003956666,0.012608549,0.015037536,0.00235108,0.0032770967,0.0076545333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011337797,0.00033562726,0.00039397838,0.00288077,0.039754495,0.00470468,0.004013098,0.0049465704,0.0005072895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003251639,0.000012727031,0.005801393,0.00007892246,0.000015295598,0.00033365024,0.14302137,0.00027088966,0.0005733275,0.82997024,0.004297853,0.015591825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026089228,0.000079426834,0.06824003,0.0011897605,0.00006332942,0.00069043663,0.23451182,0.0015436511,0.0013795142,0.132419,0.55964404,0.00021294435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64572775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82243544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64572775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04457432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02874023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71271724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947673921","doi":"10.7202/1059470ar","title":"Le précompte syndical obligatoire revu à la lumière de la décision de la Cour suprême américaine dans l’affaire Janus","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013914589812017321,"score_gpt":0.2938059647433079,"score_spread":0.27989137493129057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947673921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087516025,0.006883254,0.0105650835,0.14961486,0.0054155937,0.00031058397,0.00072343636,0.00026827742,0.7387029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40212944,0.001526465,0.0051642135,0.053500354,0.0009544862,0.00034282895,0.00022545797,0.00014426488,0.5360125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903245,0.0015205478,0.00046476317,0.0019386318,0.0034614059,0.0022901273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918962,0.0035622832,0.00033873733,0.0005653155,0.002831504,0.0008059733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007007716,0.0005554389,0.0006108368,0.0013090395,0.012684175,0.011900015,0.0016184457,0.009544508,0.011520882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014521638,0.00075706706,0.0009127833,0.0009361905,0.008526926,0.0029741996,0.0042883568,0.013363218,0.0016818125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066636625,0.00003354255,0.0020912904,0.000052896303,0.000025055979,0.00024360485,0.0035785767,0.00025649788,0.0009918072,0.93747324,0.044018935,0.011167913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005420329,0.00007646236,0.0059363907,0.00033786878,0.00006198811,0.000101035876,0.0022217222,0.00047506703,0.0028859072,0.044928063,0.9428059,0.00011542005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32855088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48729816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32855088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020192318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035240233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.653277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947708920","doi":"10.7202/1059283ar","title":"Le déroulement du procès pénal français (aperçus comparatifs avec le droit canadien)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.014743552705142573,"score_gpt":0.24401316719237356,"score_spread":0.229269614487231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947708920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4798127,0.0033042673,0.00441621,0.009415033,0.00048956793,0.00019204678,0.0013574318,0.00008121968,0.5009315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264348,0.0010948225,0.0015362276,0.0006640365,0.00006151119,0.000072153,0.00044420306,0.0000774302,0.069614835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964805,0.0008266018,0.00012946391,0.00036968343,0.0010316679,0.0011619894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555176,0.00071278744,0.0008803875,0.00026064165,0.0018623092,0.0007320934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023419077,0.0004747633,0.00023971361,0.0036578716,0.0064175404,0.00768756,0.0006818765,0.001103591,0.027227936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061782952,0.0001970604,0.00046996973,0.0040053274,0.005398644,0.0026004803,0.0034702288,0.0015708848,0.0016422347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003538404,0.0001513288,0.10301081,0.000453079,0.0000831498,0.00089920184,0.13473609,0.0013333462,0.0012042265,0.5881996,0.024929015,0.14464626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028483133,0.00019093615,0.40793908,0.0007217788,0.000049863473,0.00051321666,0.090934984,0.0008260049,0.000775049,0.012812951,0.48510587,0.000101761354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4772574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5520636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5227426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01869184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01397265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94895893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947710438","doi":"10.7202/1059405ar","title":"LA COMMISSION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE DU QUÉBEC : CINQ ANNÉES DE LUTTE POUR LE DROIT À L’ÉGALITÉ","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017383015883573324,"score_gpt":0.267263502678603,"score_spread":0.24988048679502967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947710438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17206979,0.040677138,0.004323626,0.11379052,0.0051329075,0.0009957117,0.017929334,0.00036554635,0.64471537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20482653,0.0052498067,0.0023355237,0.00849968,0.00016413172,0.00029141584,0.0024573503,0.00008269819,0.7760929],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828184,0.00015372824,0.00006393018,0.00015859645,0.00074169046,0.0006003066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716836,0.00015827079,0.00010843499,0.00008643098,0.0017784135,0.00070003455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013617364,0.0005132386,0.00032620804,0.0014039181,0.0077982116,0.0037654834,0.0009026023,0.0021901096,0.018700877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002818265,0.00038538134,0.0004048335,0.002008615,0.0018155082,0.0007340872,0.0012129176,0.0028593633,0.0013820747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015572015,0.00010022705,0.031868424,0.0004266531,0.000077196535,0.0006999339,0.01573306,0.0012376839,0.0016185967,0.16935547,0.66864777,0.11007929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018140765,0.0000250149,0.07668411,0.00022435158,0.000015886402,0.00005046488,0.002531817,0.00018418964,0.00028488023,0.0006581011,0.91926324,0.000059836642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07669581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07669581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13307531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5564697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947806186","doi":"10.7202/1059346ar","title":"TROIS MOYENS DE DÉFENSE GÉNÉRALE : LA CONTRAINTE PHYSIQUE, LA CONTRAINTE PAR MENACES ET LA NÉCESSITÉ","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013610192011210585,"score_gpt":0.28477506804209446,"score_spread":0.27116487603088385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947806186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12775163,0.03121478,0.02741324,0.17278314,0.0016323765,0.00029381417,0.00081995607,0.00014432769,0.6379468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8367268,0.009944926,0.0078110863,0.016997702,0.00058771245,0.0002997888,0.00037134317,0.00009203694,0.12716857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859407,0.003515181,0.000691047,0.0014707426,0.0054460443,0.0029362957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882311,0.004496787,0.0014146591,0.0007841717,0.003917278,0.0011560298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008264357,0.0007627753,0.0010206982,0.002753825,0.009324806,0.0095070945,0.0026755903,0.006837315,0.016395949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023721363,0.0005781124,0.00089788076,0.0020964802,0.02044355,0.0053687147,0.0047814217,0.010229978,0.0017354672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035846162,0.000026664937,0.0051429714,0.00021768654,0.000032802214,0.00019892582,0.0079354085,0.0003799748,0.0004742258,0.95345235,0.010340539,0.02176265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005762643,0.00014532906,0.049490523,0.0024517837,0.00010302829,0.0010088664,0.022759825,0.0009270517,0.0014997621,0.32219312,0.59913903,0.00022396888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2536549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4164626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2536549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017817402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034455776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5043569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947843570","doi":"10.7202/1059228ar","title":"Mining Claim Disputes in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statute; Excuse; Test (biology); Compliance (psychology); Seriousness; Rule of thumb; Political science; Business; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.026977943463461183,"score_gpt":0.27304859417342997,"score_spread":0.24607065070996878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947843570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28902197,0.0057204263,0.0013610229,0.03185298,0.00042087282,0.00039784863,0.002347702,0.00010644529,0.66877073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79018533,0.0033962824,0.0009570519,0.0048287716,0.00016280917,0.00014405437,0.0008462247,0.000037465146,0.19944207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930061,0.0005433339,0.00042068036,0.0005282908,0.0031815958,0.0023200104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241215,0.0022744653,0.00089526695,0.0003698912,0.0027592026,0.0012890411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031290771,0.00031735565,0.00045897524,0.0022419814,0.032854747,0.0062463097,0.0021674496,0.0051117525,0.01739616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011147751,0.00063703395,0.0006333125,0.0059468085,0.00566368,0.0018567408,0.0050581214,0.0026380685,0.0010020254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003229923,0.00017859704,0.057267893,0.0007750658,0.00010051446,0.013538483,0.10974288,0.0016455295,0.0021058149,0.5258068,0.21969342,0.06882198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010668561,0.00006456034,0.093273215,0.00038342245,0.00010261704,0.0014678935,0.03128146,0.0016717318,0.00061008934,0.021010509,0.8498642,0.00016354209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99255615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112404846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112404846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10675712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8155581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947899387","doi":"10.7202/1059191ar","title":"Le Code de procédure pénale du Québec : éléments de problématique et de solution","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016778657376221168,"score_gpt":0.27318353212430285,"score_spread":0.2564048747480817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947899387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022290444,0.0363856,0.06309419,0.4424488,0.0066740867,0.0006817349,0.003183974,0.00045795096,0.42478326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54455173,0.033163566,0.0709131,0.053134583,0.0023693505,0.0008050773,0.0020777944,0.00039487876,0.29258993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854194,0.0034973163,0.00047709214,0.0013122199,0.0074306633,0.0018633702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722012,0.005431477,0.0009936842,0.0013199262,0.018948317,0.0011053762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008815124,0.001054488,0.00073687744,0.0036754764,0.0090803895,0.009614414,0.0033775144,0.005948951,0.011161531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028450502,0.000597209,0.00077835924,0.00600866,0.010279075,0.004033995,0.002375748,0.008590686,0.0015080307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002722428,0.000043302527,0.0056160577,0.00033029477,0.00003483862,0.00040258231,0.0031191455,0.0025123297,0.0003276347,0.7171303,0.18187389,0.08858242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024667923,0.000036297795,0.01693488,0.0021665602,0.00005049866,0.00041072408,0.005178584,0.007823054,0.0005087427,0.07802405,0.8886965,0.00014542704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96211845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.962902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96211845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0773552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14826287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5612539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947990800","doi":"10.7202/1058503ar","title":"Do Inferior Tribunals have the Power to declare a Law Unconstitutional? A case in support","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Charter; Law; Duty; Political science; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Legislature; Power (physics); Common law; Geography","score_opus":0.029238384044872518,"score_gpt":0.31477875234280983,"score_spread":0.28554036829793733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947990800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22259581,0.003072738,0.010085737,0.3616507,0.002085134,0.00018517226,0.00011246121,0.00005402884,0.40015817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8816636,0.0012531818,0.0028044481,0.08124078,0.0009619628,0.00010719794,0.000039082555,0.00004731182,0.031882335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.975076,0.007902213,0.0013208063,0.003284665,0.005717974,0.006698301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94979775,0.034932476,0.0036984044,0.003362771,0.0049970164,0.0032115413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039999727,0.0005206512,0.0011864303,0.0022501326,0.025458142,0.012505394,0.0050589615,0.024764983,0.008912281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08718915,0.00083334104,0.0011854961,0.002013494,0.04042801,0.010586324,0.009504652,0.031585336,0.0010815571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058958034,0.00007364014,0.0049742074,0.00005950324,0.00002370241,0.0045154,0.016980214,0.00011146903,0.00028168457,0.951939,0.011464169,0.009518054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002131408,0.00025301758,0.009352514,0.0018270444,0.00028151606,0.007967845,0.07270517,0.0022753759,0.0032458694,0.32937422,0.57218504,0.00031915284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10541424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18960762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10541424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011884231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017444119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2115413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948005597","doi":"10.7202/1059403ar","title":"LES TRIBUNAUX ET LA PROTECTION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE AU CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.021947298133521226,"score_gpt":0.2862527807053273,"score_spread":0.2643054825718061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948005597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29485902,0.010569706,0.0025990352,0.037691377,0.0003177818,0.000053658423,0.00036463497,0.000052385345,0.6534925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91806763,0.002837372,0.0005129195,0.0019840105,0.000031267053,0.000014307035,0.000050132378,0.000019318244,0.07648301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696046,0.00048956834,0.00005335387,0.0001957574,0.00071243726,0.0015883744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837697,0.00024143294,0.000104388986,0.00008001957,0.00077056553,0.000426723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010984349,0.00031848924,0.00032974285,0.0014462508,0.022269962,0.0071913805,0.0011131231,0.0015564108,0.010013599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002701013,0.00020669287,0.0002883064,0.0022621062,0.013317171,0.0012777421,0.0025039588,0.0024389508,0.0005251434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005574466,0.00002524575,0.01858252,0.000120233366,0.000027694394,0.00058991095,0.075386606,0.0005496989,0.00054629595,0.84293723,0.021386,0.039792713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024190093,0.000049445578,0.115442716,0.0010314587,0.00009473179,0.00047088094,0.17875534,0.0008439803,0.0010312998,0.03986556,0.662246,0.00014437904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98687464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0652081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0652081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09475667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4731201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948007502","doi":"10.7202/1058583ar","title":"Du droit de l’État à la vérité au droit à la vérité de l’État","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics; Political science","score_opus":0.01597913899252085,"score_gpt":0.26497626830222454,"score_spread":0.2489971293097037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948007502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037939575,0.008138162,0.02773923,0.0954956,0.0022024205,0.00013028989,0.0003670003,0.00023626587,0.82775146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042238,0.0067546377,0.009763369,0.015856862,0.0012626613,0.00022598343,0.0003107477,0.00043138312,0.26117057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856529,0.005643618,0.0005046852,0.0024747248,0.004173252,0.0015508506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977671,0.010475982,0.0023079338,0.0035451332,0.004339104,0.0016607672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008346838,0.00052619516,0.0005589011,0.00186836,0.008511794,0.021204052,0.001819535,0.0061139925,0.0327054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027336886,0.0006070996,0.0007812343,0.002008723,0.016381582,0.01408533,0.008077439,0.009940571,0.0068887994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051660103,0.000021358948,0.0011453221,0.0001254086,0.000014575571,0.00021071844,0.01427457,0.0002907468,0.0005702281,0.95037794,0.011298971,0.021618363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027866952,0.00006554229,0.0036514308,0.00080599607,0.00003234745,0.00047232507,0.012650053,0.0005288998,0.001509212,0.20362547,0.7765392,0.00009159854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017981032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01399153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0327054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00989334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012221129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109410465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948260689","doi":"","title":"License to Kill","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student Research Proceedings","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.24423694469833657,"score_gpt":0.49975837657728645,"score_spread":0.2555214318789499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948260689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013363063,0.00012049614,0.00042536168,0.0029762734,0.0016390985,0.0000645897,0.00074656785,0.00036776334,0.99232364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008002499,0.0000988458,0.00015006983,0.0014919372,0.00022176703,0.000050832426,0.00052978075,0.00011061793,0.98934376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847084,0.00013831993,0.00005095051,0.00019384472,0.00061326224,0.00053283694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737847,0.00036368085,0.000102614555,0.00061910646,0.00087904115,0.00065713876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011338515,0.00090267626,0.0006835626,0.0019838617,0.0054194643,0.0053348113,0.0015456054,0.0036238162,0.6134449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006703968,0.00043197835,0.000913485,0.00058171677,0.0017945641,0.0028314928,0.0056258887,0.004910925,0.4584897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074844036,0.00009172068,0.0010943641,0.00008219696,0.000015346595,0.00045620403,0.0004907287,0.00008743497,0.00070591347,0.05278234,0.881606,0.06251292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009984064,0.000022965547,0.0010118462,0.00006210996,0.000005863963,0.00024159708,0.00041032824,0.00006452571,0.0001967395,0.0038835704,0.9940785,0.000011821076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008618374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018283302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6134449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013756839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040480853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55137384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948261530","doi":"10.21991/cf29383","title":"Constitutionalizing (In)justice: Treaty Interpretation and the Containment of Indigenous Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.011877901389146147,"score_gpt":0.28299654782823386,"score_spread":0.27111864643908773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948261530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043106206,0.00861306,0.015620834,0.12135752,0.001491952,0.000117431104,0.00029015844,0.00012698685,0.8092758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93382066,0.0021789295,0.003800882,0.01105651,0.0005851356,0.00008451246,0.00009902015,0.00008756024,0.04828693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988857,0.003566123,0.00033386968,0.0010477945,0.0033814078,0.002813833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375916,0.002988456,0.00040727603,0.00059595745,0.0018802946,0.0003689348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013975581,0.0003478873,0.0005303947,0.0021978084,0.014452883,0.015847258,0.0027340257,0.00485535,0.0058347583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021122474,0.00026003565,0.00040438317,0.0027470642,0.051596735,0.0050391345,0.004618922,0.006829558,0.00026918334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031551465,0.0000021923406,0.000119232,0.000014273965,0.000002255742,0.00003156716,0.0039082738,0.00008237115,0.000047669448,0.9897473,0.003625757,0.002415853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027064792,0.000014843513,0.0028646924,0.0004329574,0.0000421672,0.000060264327,0.012156507,0.0007324924,0.0005429327,0.64846367,0.33459267,0.000069705064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8287952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8469023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94985396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050146047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07555148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3638367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950743607","doi":"10.17062/cjil.v5i1.84","title":"Disrupting Law, Reclaiming Justice – Remarks, Responses, and Summary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10108331889861627,"score_gpt":0.3740073523353142,"score_spread":0.2729240334366979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950743607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2589461,0.034811612,0.012330569,0.5614044,0.036050722,0.0021955366,0.0021750566,0.00031123505,0.091774724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55495745,0.04327298,0.0065466017,0.2258324,0.011639657,0.0041670636,0.0018909711,0.000664343,0.15102856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900059,0.0065135197,0.0006577784,0.0005006833,0.0011438741,0.0011782773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96547914,0.02721146,0.0013247589,0.00038025284,0.004651752,0.00095267285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011043757,0.00090997934,0.00062411657,0.0015453479,0.01102634,0.0056942436,0.0021271321,0.007457784,0.003801591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044175543,0.0007511503,0.0006209601,0.0025431109,0.004894053,0.004536123,0.0040555666,0.011851378,0.0015403419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021828461,0.00010746758,0.0024023114,0.0014692545,0.000028627794,0.0030639388,0.7185376,0.0003564124,0.0050333748,0.0151856,0.22968008,0.023916956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000756224,0.0001021029,0.0037681453,0.0011588664,0.000011332699,0.00062251405,0.6974106,0.00020485662,0.0012458708,0.0017357677,0.29366532,0.000067071735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016096523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020991294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016096523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078084306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006225943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058405697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950821204","doi":"","title":"L'INDEPENDANCE JUDICIAIRE : FONDEMENT DU PRINCIPE ET SON APPLICATION AUX TRIBUNAUX ADMINISTRATIFS","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionality; Political science; Charter; Constitution; Judicial independence; Legislature; Independence (probability theory); Parliament; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.052851209967884276,"score_gpt":0.35544119216988096,"score_spread":0.3025899822019967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950821204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009256604,0.14003178,0.056797996,0.12335336,0.0024170128,0.00009352955,0.00025411116,0.00011281493,0.66768277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7467603,0.07357121,0.03957259,0.022018323,0.006252749,0.00036703178,0.0001739677,0.00021893436,0.11106486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985091,0.0051030517,0.00047240636,0.0018173788,0.0060107666,0.0015054764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99061006,0.005890349,0.00045118804,0.00084964436,0.0017912831,0.0004073603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013403407,0.00077824685,0.0010686604,0.0036192841,0.008415706,0.012049526,0.0021883275,0.0054646004,0.0036764962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016963508,0.00086692924,0.00089184195,0.0038961305,0.042273164,0.0059514754,0.0032943992,0.011319611,0.0009678584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033318834,0.0000021034498,0.000101759746,0.000022389835,0.0000050616595,0.000026132371,0.0006342819,0.00009568838,0.000021269409,0.9905861,0.004113913,0.004387975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001835171,0.000013889769,0.0015786353,0.00028160942,0.000018243607,0.000113141374,0.0004887563,0.0004650707,0.0001249711,0.7133398,0.28352663,0.00003082415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31881297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.314771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31881297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025077159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021603579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63391453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952789473","doi":"","title":"The New Law of Criminal Organizations in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Convention; Criminology; Organised crime; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.030980766265372914,"score_gpt":0.3077849890407311,"score_spread":0.27680422277535816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952789473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027535206,0.14743447,0.0022597476,0.12534639,0.002534013,0.00022149108,0.0029859066,0.0000851621,0.69159764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6525722,0.12283668,0.004546768,0.040532187,0.0007440368,0.00021214431,0.0018772132,0.00009169268,0.17658709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899913,0.00080561545,0.0003044816,0.00065559935,0.00644579,0.0017972582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878293,0.001562273,0.00059846824,0.0003282583,0.0085264845,0.0011551519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003100979,0.00041665335,0.0005680751,0.006226395,0.013509686,0.009529013,0.002087553,0.0029089276,0.0067565194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013817686,0.00067693385,0.0004690156,0.009284938,0.0072122184,0.0031792917,0.0020125303,0.0039046358,0.00052700273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022497397,0.000017217042,0.0037219466,0.00040585228,0.000026787297,0.00022026405,0.0032688226,0.00050874386,0.000104960156,0.75121975,0.1941692,0.04631392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021904525,0.000012385539,0.014692161,0.00096186367,0.000055502518,0.00009373677,0.0028359245,0.00040062476,0.00011872287,0.029558381,0.9511846,0.00006425928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99748385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99843675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19432764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19432764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34309787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93446577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952856709","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Finding Articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08714474745084512,"score_gpt":0.34520902552870547,"score_spread":0.25806427807786037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952856709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010791128,0.044295635,0.0012773199,0.063815705,0.008378838,0.0018450345,0.14377142,0.0016960247,0.72412884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09305346,0.046190605,0.006167814,0.017638873,0.0026335348,0.0016064037,0.06431015,0.0015335729,0.7668656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990842,0.0006579116,0.000608532,0.00056600646,0.0054897354,0.0018358461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649648,0.005115508,0.0009222341,0.0009613992,0.023715321,0.0043207365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009128997,0.0012589055,0.000883926,0.026239676,0.012602121,0.015363963,0.0023519145,0.0038805688,0.114495225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034896124,0.0006101659,0.0010312083,0.02715253,0.0038999263,0.0029554695,0.004256337,0.002130932,0.012359175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083808496,0.000028795437,0.003223305,0.0013430227,0.000028257664,0.00013309492,0.00089711207,0.00010096708,0.00013976883,0.01627013,0.92789155,0.049860302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024212972,0.0000072497387,0.008016052,0.0014090275,0.000041714076,0.000041163385,0.0018391901,0.00010241058,0.00024790748,0.0018252473,0.9864194,0.000026456202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9638699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97730154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114495225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07132205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3232429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51748013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952879402","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8069","title":"Assessing the Damage: Money Awards by the OHRT in Sexual Harassment Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Damages; Entitlement (fair division); Psychology; Tribunal; Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10727226551777226,"score_gpt":0.44547524043829306,"score_spread":0.3382029749205208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952879402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551935,0.00056087866,0.00057929964,0.0017852059,0.00006500845,0.00013593525,0.00019151047,0.000008207722,0.04148055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975025,0.00025634363,0.000260893,0.00008582794,0.0000237632,0.000017138907,0.00006477045,0.000001613589,0.0017870993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989321,0.0027396104,0.0010825789,0.00024476377,0.0050103166,0.0016017882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857684,0.004041678,0.0052018417,0.0004021075,0.0030712988,0.0015147175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077290474,0.00028454373,0.00037205042,0.007435394,0.0025970098,0.003374933,0.0013004316,0.0015264468,0.0039440617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039900728,0.0003039226,0.00045129427,0.0037772914,0.0028890413,0.0030839837,0.0046695154,0.0018931329,0.00048492258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040359827,0.0003643834,0.8877483,0.00017005707,0.00013374958,0.0050166673,0.012954872,0.002159275,0.00054198294,0.025295682,0.005433474,0.059777897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024496137,0.0005647712,0.9437825,0.0003130662,0.00015558292,0.002300621,0.033320397,0.0032153542,0.00074939243,0.0071273725,0.008375949,0.000070519454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04819863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13532785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04819863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062596877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025179905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09583616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953029123","doi":"","title":"INTERRELATED POLICE INVESTIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Law; Interrogation; Work (physics); Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.1315689610285244,"score_gpt":0.32624042227241323,"score_spread":0.19467146124388884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953029123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27346003,0.05352959,0.025314767,0.05192951,0.00154063,0.000813886,0.000290774,0.00010494892,0.59301585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460793,0.01846641,0.006150037,0.005878873,0.00082996406,0.00019507468,0.00009384839,0.000032331754,0.02227415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9552613,0.023115281,0.002542435,0.0029582367,0.012419972,0.003702814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339798,0.037978888,0.014630236,0.00395596,0.0075841546,0.001870824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140017895,0.00044707372,0.0005173343,0.008301053,0.010305061,0.009768486,0.0017378234,0.0041436986,0.0072885044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07903202,0.0006884811,0.0005372912,0.009045467,0.012602233,0.0073184646,0.011648651,0.0055702473,0.00077562715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018543984,0.00022613237,0.047057215,0.0006206519,0.00010148849,0.007894267,0.067141764,0.000922613,0.0010155438,0.5996023,0.016175974,0.25905663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000664812,0.00031978625,0.11181998,0.004133297,0.00015721677,0.009714235,0.10176521,0.0017334458,0.0021389178,0.269881,0.49805713,0.00021331853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025065994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034216784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009673039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011468905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07404941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953762600","doi":"","title":"L'appréhension du territoire penal par le Canada et la France","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009086713970331962,"score_gpt":0.20830179990544637,"score_spread":0.19921508593511442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953762600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46115294,0.026827728,0.0032694025,0.124608986,0.00088744017,0.00007859443,0.0007598862,0.00011811154,0.38229695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707181,0.0073452825,0.0010043377,0.0080420235,0.00012563737,0.00003444911,0.00016488676,0.0000507663,0.11251467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961474,0.0006370981,0.00006328624,0.00037776303,0.001532404,0.0012421437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968029,0.0007024997,0.00035341713,0.00009069243,0.0014977023,0.00055277173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019358349,0.0005092934,0.00038443078,0.0020915044,0.016171645,0.0076435157,0.0012244694,0.0034955968,0.01135894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048732874,0.00027658293,0.00051532045,0.0029752674,0.008904396,0.002027011,0.0028625124,0.0037281003,0.0005541159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018683833,0.000060911283,0.07903641,0.00040532637,0.00011666554,0.0046498845,0.17642646,0.0020907158,0.0013902256,0.5309627,0.0745468,0.13012709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001889554,0.00006663382,0.13417417,0.0012221241,0.00008401963,0.0013828492,0.18740886,0.0011244179,0.00077322015,0.009066759,0.66447645,0.00020154301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99026006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07317913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07317913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09490523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53095424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954662585","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2019v44n2a3555","title":"The Unfulfilled Promise of Press Freedom in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.022038389069013162,"score_gpt":0.26113127747698134,"score_spread":0.23909288840796816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954662585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121472694,0.008882284,0.0011528002,0.6778942,0.0016487396,0.00010225455,0.0010314479,0.000099969395,0.18771577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85502523,0.0035018835,0.001049305,0.06400291,0.0005160273,0.000047981546,0.00019693586,0.00011491594,0.07554478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797365,0.0021297967,0.00050998497,0.001428267,0.0072622597,0.008933094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94970053,0.014345779,0.0017839952,0.0015001013,0.0166678,0.016001744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011381807,0.00037872433,0.0012902896,0.0029527054,0.026619516,0.02053291,0.0032454175,0.011790809,0.014793674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041126337,0.0010885244,0.0010175926,0.00430307,0.013861719,0.0050546597,0.00566404,0.015053951,0.0006841648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038403785,0.00010413031,0.013081579,0.000291768,0.00016862476,0.0011502801,0.0144676855,0.0019429674,0.00066570187,0.6895787,0.22674032,0.051424164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024496182,0.00009011212,0.04611576,0.0006077335,0.00018182588,0.00023218365,0.017821152,0.002591922,0.0009650296,0.08714793,0.84352165,0.00047962888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99651116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99837554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20644876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20644876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40050632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92040694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955041574","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada relating to criminal law and to procedure in criminal cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Dominion; Law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025792686856163507,"score_gpt":0.27162973995952444,"score_spread":0.24583705310336093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955041574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009359141,0.04917486,0.0007741376,0.08786854,0.007888695,0.00022317338,0.006201493,0.0002396423,0.8382703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057824977,0.012466334,0.0012387446,0.01634115,0.0008262862,0.00008311273,0.0011055967,0.00016707582,0.90994674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952661,0.00031852457,0.00014071657,0.00022799576,0.0028161884,0.001230531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594575,0.001366892,0.00016336425,0.00013155611,0.001853054,0.0005393718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017807913,0.00085955195,0.0007418339,0.004208414,0.017245986,0.008490898,0.0020484233,0.0062285136,0.020656593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010166696,0.0010608854,0.00064189645,0.006279866,0.0054852413,0.00163471,0.0013136325,0.006394607,0.0027530564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015426911,0.00000930395,0.00033298414,0.00010067144,0.0000072936514,0.00010008377,0.0026490465,0.00009888871,0.00010693051,0.07775715,0.9053923,0.013429946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000438567,0.0000030189537,0.0028224417,0.000120861674,0.000009407336,0.000033874887,0.0011443106,0.000054118966,0.0001470838,0.0020467327,0.9935888,0.000025016088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08926402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08926402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20083946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6476588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295536601","doi":"10.20381/ruor-23674","title":"Why There Should Be No Constitutional Right to Contact Counsel from a Police Car","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Law; Charter; Constitutional right; Supreme court; Political science; Right to privacy; Principal (computer security); Right to counsel; Constitutional law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.212490332066596,"score_gpt":0.3745199890871766,"score_spread":0.1620296570205806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295536601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0967219,0.0042018443,0.009400516,0.30305433,0.0013571703,0.00029464616,0.0012292202,0.00016557472,0.58357483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86870706,0.0016834791,0.0046034274,0.078473054,0.0004237314,0.0001541935,0.00026801907,0.00009106401,0.04559594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98245263,0.0020306543,0.0007091929,0.0033997784,0.005845688,0.0055620484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98494035,0.005227507,0.00052893563,0.001614119,0.0055902475,0.0020989173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014206417,0.00036199362,0.00091130385,0.0012080848,0.016323397,0.011801454,0.0039153723,0.01467029,0.0076271957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027909635,0.0008627019,0.0007498576,0.0009034593,0.03402982,0.0064916085,0.0037258798,0.014996143,0.0012520488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024694875,0.000029088073,0.0017098179,0.000044611344,0.000010698199,0.00022956563,0.0028876425,0.00011296615,0.0003460676,0.9702473,0.018646885,0.005710685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002961635,0.00009773746,0.013610399,0.0012746243,0.00021677262,0.0008168938,0.0139328595,0.00096363697,0.002771426,0.4311048,0.5345586,0.00035607067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8365554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85729396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032199048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09532619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3288142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956273921","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0038","title":"The <i>Charter</i> and Criminal Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Duty; Arbitrariness; Discretion; Economic Justice; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057569177977399105,"score_gpt":0.2766184970796385,"score_spread":0.21904931910223938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956273921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036617836,0.032241166,0.0018010185,0.02321526,0.0011392729,0.00002899834,0.00012627793,0.00005329111,0.9377328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4313375,0.070943184,0.0044561904,0.0097472835,0.0013163364,0.00006604575,0.00027744359,0.00019151412,0.48166448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998221,0.0003137097,0.000025588115,0.00013537041,0.0009168164,0.0003875294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887186,0.0003719887,0.00006875228,0.00006185867,0.0004816334,0.00014385946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012372313,0.00044316164,0.000299911,0.0022034454,0.006390821,0.009421882,0.0010102326,0.0012923676,0.016427191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024083012,0.0002117563,0.0002617657,0.0030593665,0.01767844,0.0025136122,0.0017479729,0.0029907536,0.0012332851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037475886,0.00000340633,0.00012912446,0.000059848127,0.0000013586828,0.000028783743,0.0020700514,0.0001082752,0.000051230232,0.92334026,0.05170366,0.022500148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021993528,0.000006058326,0.0012182076,0.0004729039,0.0000045035954,0.00004549039,0.0022497214,0.00018428547,0.000108489476,0.08252266,0.91316724,0.000018170447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84318084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8757204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84318084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051637273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05147701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37465644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956679824","doi":"","title":"Comparaison de la nouvelle California Consumer Privacy Act avec le cadre juridique canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.015906095685237518,"score_gpt":0.27465764178012464,"score_spread":0.2587515460948871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956679824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77558994,0.0054197437,0.00066059554,0.026193313,0.0005025364,0.00017025045,0.0056598573,0.00006744806,0.18573624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961946,0.0010252186,0.00029176852,0.0024352772,0.00018611226,0.00010814127,0.0018221121,0.000028059114,0.03215722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97872066,0.005073469,0.00091289094,0.0016801119,0.011122047,0.0024908995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91954017,0.043446682,0.011472326,0.0036488874,0.01782375,0.004068171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012308528,0.00025564106,0.00095499237,0.0038302522,0.003614622,0.009498006,0.0017209419,0.0021583356,0.011700644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063469775,0.00062904746,0.000837151,0.0054242467,0.0025980573,0.0024822506,0.0023426374,0.004562299,0.0010255035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019548945,0.0007797862,0.7215271,0.00034608925,0.0006689578,0.0004087134,0.0077123046,0.0041686045,0.0002625201,0.09988638,0.112510234,0.04977436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008864639,0.00019866067,0.95024294,0.00015966548,0.00026673582,0.00008235399,0.0059430776,0.00094670925,0.00027784903,0.0010389627,0.040699143,0.0000551916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6668397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7264475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33316028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01917776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022995286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67024463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960765459","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jly012","title":"Reflections on Themes from The Realm of Criminal Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Criminal law; Law; Politics; Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Retributive justice; Public law; Political science; Social science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.22764602111522103,"score_gpt":0.5030289001686215,"score_spread":0.2753828790534004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960765459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033143493,0.49078023,0.0014118631,0.4361638,0.0088041555,0.000017057813,0.000036909867,0.0000132615505,0.059458412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17949124,0.5285437,0.0029515254,0.2118548,0.02626945,0.0001969669,0.00010846759,0.00012885439,0.05045494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225134,0.0049226494,0.00017568248,0.00044787218,0.0016101219,0.0005923415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979675,0.018417709,0.00036925604,0.0002126427,0.0008505493,0.00047487675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007383289,0.00057794736,0.00089972414,0.004105956,0.0075226193,0.011625046,0.0017965937,0.0069446834,0.003700308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104890615,0.00057680055,0.0005107781,0.004869781,0.034687024,0.013758862,0.0047792965,0.014849029,0.0006711211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011993075,0.000024134415,0.00020691557,0.0004411842,0.0000060954703,0.00030790723,0.033866744,0.000055799977,0.000086228676,0.74997926,0.18952763,0.025486076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003421772,0.000008997209,0.00042587772,0.0015711897,0.0000021678952,0.00021939875,0.012907441,0.0000328725,0.000041747146,0.07055534,0.91422224,0.000009212496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012889463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022894964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012889463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011319927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006173062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961168636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0057","title":"A new legal science with an old aftertaste","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scholarship; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Criminal justice; Argumentative; Normative; Criticism; Criminal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010563075363505973,"score_gpt":0.248315783896043,"score_spread":0.23775270853253702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961168636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004488194,0.076870136,0.032638974,0.6847179,0.021080134,0.000036282534,0.00014348543,0.00027544066,0.17974952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40371585,0.0978399,0.04325024,0.19138868,0.08392234,0.00038123256,0.0003156586,0.0009087682,0.17827739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924077,0.0032738303,0.00023489712,0.0007992152,0.002922156,0.00036213553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857841,0.008409319,0.00059269735,0.0023789813,0.0017271471,0.0011077565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009212107,0.00097345794,0.0014943883,0.003914277,0.008454017,0.018122056,0.0022203592,0.0094253,0.007670316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01381015,0.00056629785,0.00075808354,0.0023124008,0.0898098,0.033257518,0.009363345,0.01806401,0.0023207588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007434536,0.000010722674,0.00007392777,0.00005124056,0.000004485402,0.000029068662,0.0010243754,0.00004446091,0.00006576144,0.97369474,0.01798812,0.007005796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009582098,0.000023581773,0.00013604322,0.00025268493,0.000004714115,0.000108792454,0.0017118566,0.00030663327,0.00009561208,0.73915654,0.25817937,0.000014493905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033273294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050609442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018122056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007528025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077770986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962852945","doi":"","title":"Éducaloi - Espace jeunesse","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Public space; Art; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03286930031846414,"score_gpt":0.3186110627488826,"score_spread":0.2857417624304185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962852945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17063594,0.013051561,0.0012241321,0.11267646,0.0027383016,0.000120821656,0.00048442732,0.00029806187,0.6987703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35756698,0.004973534,0.0007650648,0.014325875,0.0003423065,0.000040951614,0.0001908677,0.00007401164,0.6217203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988568,0.00019173282,0.000018809638,0.00008591626,0.0004018783,0.0004449168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998268,0.00013670309,0.00014646059,0.00008192972,0.00051609613,0.0008507697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011406102,0.0003537966,0.00027273412,0.001192505,0.011133919,0.003383042,0.0005481646,0.0013935985,0.015757782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024974118,0.00014744962,0.00016124755,0.00063738285,0.0033600945,0.001082753,0.002794936,0.002541024,0.0021730764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010017614,0.00024021271,0.05765474,0.00023237073,0.000035761168,0.002288455,0.09665191,0.00021035822,0.0020125925,0.1173823,0.39253277,0.33065835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060018797,0.0000543412,0.043903545,0.00024796271,0.000012721318,0.0006339926,0.027280625,0.00007070416,0.00043329684,0.0022243545,0.92510706,0.000025373782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45354065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70052457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5464593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00836525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014004523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9018015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965865542","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0022","title":"Criminal Law in the Federal Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Federal jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Parliament; Criminal law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Federalism; Criminal jurisdiction; Section (typography); Federal law; Legislation; Business; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.08337311197529869,"score_gpt":0.2876290359989117,"score_spread":0.20425592402361303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965865542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067347246,0.02749765,0.0016425195,0.023681628,0.0006724767,0.000026374062,0.00016794787,0.000036937046,0.93953985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76719856,0.024192212,0.002433597,0.014494055,0.001143841,0.00008439464,0.00030557657,0.000043434313,0.19010437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814415,0.00054068456,0.000051031377,0.00019445331,0.0006369515,0.00043273126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860615,0.00073223247,0.000069699505,0.00011517146,0.0003742937,0.00010260437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012183905,0.00021607423,0.00027631538,0.0022578451,0.007178275,0.0053554773,0.0006857527,0.0025746308,0.007007992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002610083,0.00020938799,0.00019537362,0.0023503185,0.014373821,0.0019111763,0.0014719001,0.0034171867,0.0007773504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013994603,0.0000039428464,0.000113964816,0.000016610738,9.657588e-7,0.00002734347,0.000685533,0.000077319084,0.000018492838,0.97466284,0.018431649,0.005959994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041175135,0.000007679005,0.002298229,0.00063540426,0.000008210447,0.0001242582,0.0013089195,0.00039786327,0.00012247241,0.34828076,0.64679784,0.000014302664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3544298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51763946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3544298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022533994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02892612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7047336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965982429","doi":"","title":"What (is) a Nuisance? Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister of Transportation)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Truck; Political science; Engineering; Law; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.049560778947759204,"score_gpt":0.3123423020960813,"score_spread":0.26278152314832215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965982429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013796954,0.12257281,0.00048366128,0.7278327,0.0044446094,0.00009913731,0.0019562969,0.00002079857,0.128793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4301292,0.087452054,0.0017518274,0.43618897,0.004255662,0.00014935217,0.0010162623,0.000055619676,0.039001152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98146826,0.0035545505,0.0018765181,0.0015796192,0.0087903,0.0027307018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95664114,0.017907076,0.0039147777,0.001050911,0.017781625,0.0027044832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019662755,0.00045473728,0.0011664862,0.0038871677,0.008709486,0.008498046,0.0029002703,0.011223253,0.005462214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08702158,0.0008067652,0.00088888843,0.005087183,0.012268438,0.0059906454,0.001743543,0.0070549045,0.0007343293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025205204,0.000019205187,0.017961921,0.0063711,0.00032341198,0.0006646811,0.014784749,0.00010899069,0.00052647566,0.1703095,0.7301975,0.058480505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014348981,0.000034692563,0.04570102,0.017163364,0.0011259805,0.00039516288,0.017635753,0.00013475804,0.00055688486,0.033430614,0.8835029,0.00017538975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94309676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056903243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05156796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14353356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3741535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970283393","doi":"10.29173/mlj1002","title":"Robson Crim: A Vision for Multivalent Interrogations of Criminal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminal law; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Publication; Notice; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Legislature; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.1109177424403509,"score_gpt":0.4143466183227221,"score_spread":0.3034288758823712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970283393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009065762,0.03595112,0.06961196,0.3256383,0.0045337332,0.0002553933,0.00043386064,0.00044847588,0.5540615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73379844,0.017650593,0.10424989,0.051918924,0.003884563,0.0006797015,0.00032721003,0.0006644604,0.086826235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805891,0.009772132,0.00054617226,0.0020125944,0.004928685,0.002151397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97576946,0.010677544,0.0012090863,0.0029317865,0.005438624,0.0039735977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033100244,0.0014265337,0.0017946734,0.017548252,0.028234107,0.04828263,0.0076060523,0.010068054,0.011462155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03235245,0.0010563502,0.0014164527,0.009490342,0.14019188,0.028739655,0.016597046,0.013437083,0.0010575021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041079975,0.000003021955,0.000102574646,0.000031112926,0.000004867219,0.000043496093,0.005487756,0.000058041183,0.00003262336,0.9841488,0.0064751254,0.0036084244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066949096,0.000004430183,0.00023687136,0.00023813774,0.000010358161,0.000057912748,0.011429157,0.00036744084,0.000050882114,0.8341505,0.15342382,0.000023758368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5382713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5604234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4617287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079191215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08488004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92889583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970698243","doi":"","title":"A Treatise on the Criminal Law of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.013062235972318531,"score_gpt":0.2119529821214523,"score_spread":0.19889074614913377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970698243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014762087,0.041358445,0.00060109433,0.046115384,0.004110962,0.00007775902,0.001050249,0.000060359343,0.9051495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025108133,0.02895278,0.00065768,0.019920642,0.00091477693,0.00008049338,0.00035590597,0.00009144455,0.92391807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971215,0.00015957921,0.00005933201,0.00018101397,0.0017512104,0.0007272551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982147,0.00040066853,0.000041762127,0.00005707787,0.0010796798,0.0002061926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011189901,0.00094360445,0.00077857595,0.004232773,0.016096145,0.0083375005,0.002035156,0.007221665,0.037459422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005025068,0.0007358137,0.0007037149,0.0060547353,0.0053696823,0.002569494,0.0017382394,0.007682477,0.0043237396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008479133,0.000009180124,0.00014619135,0.00006041959,0.0000051845345,0.0000734708,0.00070681283,0.00017703566,0.000035438854,0.24157986,0.74066406,0.016533853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004582349,0.0000031297786,0.000589825,0.00019668858,0.000008176028,0.00003355968,0.00034009345,0.000067422785,0.000032542583,0.010595138,0.98811215,0.0000167299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99355435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066396214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066396214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15020134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48174053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971740830","doi":"","title":"Terrorism Prosecutions in Canada: Elucidating the Elements of the Offences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Criminal code; Law; Mens rea; Meaning (existential); Product (mathematics); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01094927600188977,"score_gpt":0.2623822108659582,"score_spread":0.2514329348640684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971740830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6986799,0.028629983,0.003635435,0.023830334,0.0003175987,0.00037434796,0.01857507,0.00010527398,0.22585213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604111,0.020281114,0.0029787957,0.0016211247,0.000057359033,0.000041318533,0.003778658,0.000046992038,0.010783629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933909,0.0003747532,0.00033610206,0.0003484548,0.004210925,0.0013388923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853919,0.003323852,0.0023359603,0.00048410764,0.007597446,0.0008666706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023226896,0.00045769097,0.0004271246,0.018598506,0.010783032,0.006575503,0.0017021851,0.00082816277,0.0033373719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018001793,0.00049123046,0.00045445605,0.0265649,0.004441056,0.0017896771,0.0028648297,0.0021338998,0.0003502487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020916948,0.00010332593,0.3540082,0.0016911719,0.00016133812,0.0046772747,0.065893866,0.0024651396,0.0020037554,0.24545267,0.07191809,0.25141594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001615611,0.000029326973,0.7264197,0.0014017689,0.00016819229,0.0012851093,0.046429753,0.0013120221,0.0014903506,0.010938413,0.21037512,0.00013416877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10036158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10036158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14829028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72817767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972240141","doi":"10.21991/cf29388","title":"Ford et Irwin Toy 30 ans plus tard: une conversation avec le juge de Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022283115270421167,"score_gpt":0.28672480930960176,"score_spread":0.2644416940391806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972240141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016762039,0.025558976,0.00081212935,0.8565727,0.004411941,0.00002066065,0.00009134346,0.000033598993,0.09573663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43139,0.014712048,0.001143726,0.31995603,0.0029415558,0.000078812765,0.00006327429,0.00022650103,0.2294881],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962992,0.001544829,0.0000556776,0.00049697794,0.0007366414,0.00086667674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700695,0.0017436021,0.00011273479,0.00008082049,0.00061501557,0.0004408319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037160392,0.00063980214,0.0006427229,0.0006598947,0.02566906,0.008974319,0.0016785676,0.010475366,0.006327369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062115123,0.0005904906,0.00032571238,0.0014026599,0.019553723,0.0067324406,0.0025125255,0.015839607,0.00078965595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053189542,0.000026125626,0.0011359798,0.00008303403,0.000012222655,0.0009173433,0.1333759,0.000074084506,0.00025535753,0.28626084,0.56671196,0.011093836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001070553,0.000010627974,0.0014724879,0.00013679209,0.0000063593884,0.00015774839,0.035625514,0.000081765924,0.00014307075,0.007208672,0.95511144,0.000034820878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7965918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8596442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7965918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039229646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021187022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40921217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976735168","doi":"","title":"The Provincial Statutes of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02089482005896802,"score_gpt":0.2734105629638496,"score_spread":0.25251574290488155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976735168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023537881,0.011015272,0.0013275497,0.021124547,0.0014691274,0.00015848753,0.003973502,0.00014171263,0.9584361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03148035,0.0062139994,0.0019080886,0.0050937273,0.00018290024,0.00011234766,0.00092758756,0.00013111156,0.95394987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734503,0.00017123483,0.00007122864,0.00017333361,0.0015242692,0.00071485224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763155,0.00027715391,0.00004936533,0.000102470214,0.001749962,0.0001893903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012681566,0.0007602387,0.0006032602,0.0030710322,0.013778768,0.008077087,0.0020037652,0.0034690206,0.026244553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005090826,0.0009885894,0.0006289548,0.0069616465,0.0035288404,0.0018780008,0.0012061594,0.0051824856,0.003625361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072800426,0.00000920512,0.00043300554,0.000053152864,0.000004302051,0.000037978956,0.00067690096,0.00027037,0.00004011997,0.46785814,0.5108319,0.019777536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005034924,0.0000027010058,0.0013745907,0.00010891675,0.000007555649,0.000026358155,0.00046752306,0.00022034606,0.00005945989,0.016265301,0.9814403,0.000021812826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113727465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113727465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2347689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82515436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977191326","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.42.4.511","title":"Due Process and Victims' Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Due process; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Process (computing); Sociology; Public law; Sources of law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04523311179069807,"score_gpt":0.3153036313941911,"score_spread":0.27007051960349304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977191326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031876963,0.027386751,0.012054533,0.64355165,0.0019004561,0.000045765384,0.00011634557,0.000026652995,0.283041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95033026,0.0066341422,0.0016739852,0.023886638,0.0033179936,0.00006135324,0.000029697445,0.000049576505,0.014016488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789878,0.011057799,0.0006033902,0.0018813707,0.0043770177,0.0030926608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94046867,0.04935191,0.002237479,0.0028890378,0.0028950558,0.0021579203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030971909,0.00038641505,0.0012405856,0.0025315713,0.009781058,0.021664277,0.0029676023,0.023063164,0.010006378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0725235,0.00063340063,0.00070053583,0.0025309199,0.09232007,0.025878144,0.005637264,0.020130442,0.00055151107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010292698,0.000010129636,0.00017513605,0.000013965293,0.0000029236016,0.00003348806,0.0012794277,0.0000558026,0.000018169572,0.99358314,0.00262405,0.0021933813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018868217,0.000005105457,0.00055983115,0.00009223087,0.000008287955,0.000042888023,0.0013186054,0.00020973709,0.00003417261,0.9772331,0.020462474,0.000014686346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047639735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065088175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014525734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021714186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16379708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977532631","doi":"10.29173/alr2573","title":"Building Haystacks: Information Retention and Data Exploitation by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Law; National security; Data retention; Constitutionality; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science; Politics; History","score_opus":0.06282083647697459,"score_gpt":0.35079777997837536,"score_spread":0.2879769435014008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977532631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033813544,0.05126518,0.009155557,0.28975576,0.0016873638,0.00028527036,0.001444403,0.00020380851,0.6123891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74347246,0.07725218,0.0092545245,0.066033095,0.0015791788,0.0002140213,0.0013674197,0.00023037617,0.10059672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95879483,0.0057238163,0.0012911019,0.0019540002,0.027759954,0.00447632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385961,0.02497532,0.003236773,0.004095943,0.02681697,0.00227894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029313004,0.0004246712,0.0006106406,0.007970745,0.014554094,0.0155314095,0.0035758857,0.0037545357,0.0073531317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068509676,0.0005396293,0.00073351554,0.010815332,0.027298134,0.00805404,0.0055594835,0.0056581427,0.00071008515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043702552,0.000020873822,0.006483801,0.00040671462,0.000051791612,0.00021321779,0.0060881544,0.0005901981,0.00017829663,0.7767885,0.105463676,0.10367107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029187508,0.000049598846,0.017661024,0.0022872472,0.00010852493,0.00020459047,0.008557217,0.0011403732,0.00088530924,0.076304436,0.89264745,0.00012499961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9577916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96837157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0978089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0978089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20914017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70965654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978682605","doi":"10.4324/9781843927273-14","title":"Police interrogation in Canada: from the quest for confession to the search for the truth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Willan eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Confession (law); Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08027657883831996,"score_gpt":0.32449580037681547,"score_spread":0.2442192215384955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978682605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03291773,0.15199168,0.0025687043,0.2866089,0.002986963,0.00016552031,0.0010684078,0.00011217515,0.5215799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6227651,0.1469726,0.0033902705,0.047074307,0.0010175807,0.00018146195,0.00080623955,0.0002836168,0.17750879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931078,0.0013858291,0.00020838765,0.00044695404,0.003098635,0.0017523492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992044,0.0030285448,0.0003800449,0.00020894148,0.0035057517,0.0008327299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041448874,0.0006924437,0.0008594282,0.0041862116,0.029049126,0.016175259,0.0037858067,0.005762139,0.0080877375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018780207,0.0009742243,0.00036103535,0.008392178,0.024770454,0.004754762,0.005137425,0.0075319377,0.0010913668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004506487,0.000030990035,0.0026117987,0.00046428206,0.000023345681,0.0010769813,0.09379257,0.00027195213,0.0001546496,0.34297383,0.44926962,0.10928491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015220744,0.000015017657,0.0067728152,0.0018064594,0.000033154512,0.0004796875,0.07696098,0.00032689207,0.00033287468,0.026524931,0.8866257,0.000106277526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99101806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99617505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17009299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17009299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33801645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980798085","doi":"","title":"An analysis of penal law objectives in child abuse cases: a comparison of the Kenyan and Canadian experiences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"SU+ Digital Repository (Strathmore University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Law; Criminology; Political science; Child abuse; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.011845505144846303,"score_gpt":0.27292585115019735,"score_spread":0.26108034600535107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980798085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978868,0.00071782887,0.000052174375,0.0013668593,0.000011308385,0.00006831357,0.00019019458,0.0000016811941,0.01872363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574536,0.0011419815,0.000090465415,0.00022792637,0.0000031467998,0.000021996097,0.00011904548,0.000005770275,0.002644169],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583757,0.0005990355,0.00017383571,0.00019767605,0.0012951142,0.0018967593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909128,0.002107398,0.002187599,0.00019467775,0.0031795518,0.0014179508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029070708,0.0002544049,0.00034418414,0.005652649,0.016263403,0.0053510037,0.0016988711,0.0011614885,0.004657218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015221537,0.0005636039,0.00024071355,0.010874821,0.004661152,0.0021105674,0.004460778,0.0020978923,0.00020574397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012237791,0.0001348349,0.26845306,0.00018664106,0.000029256695,0.002190067,0.69011456,0.00007840557,0.0007290003,0.012352657,0.003310386,0.02229885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029907862,0.000016987775,0.29294178,0.00021505661,0.000013500672,0.00034116238,0.6969926,0.000056748206,0.00013293399,0.00017011275,0.009091527,0.000024704672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96440655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056150086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056150086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07554322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4073993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29822783","doi":"10.29173/alr314","title":"Advisory Review: The Reincarnation of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reincarnation; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitution; Blessing; Democracy; Constitutional law; Cornerstone; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.058130698862709405,"score_gpt":0.3359071735402127,"score_spread":0.2777764746775033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29822783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009175406,0.030245988,0.012461525,0.544232,0.0219108,0.0003940967,0.00024451627,0.00037550283,0.38096023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38374946,0.024691004,0.016482607,0.33454478,0.015413443,0.00031607648,0.0002529241,0.00028149516,0.22426817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94383484,0.013349318,0.0019015967,0.004111795,0.03212712,0.0046753446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83898294,0.056150373,0.004594433,0.0077140126,0.08578757,0.0067706355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032277912,0.00036925226,0.0007464357,0.003561155,0.012450784,0.015855782,0.0030056657,0.009448345,0.0035832773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15556078,0.0005279779,0.00043016265,0.003320308,0.013770314,0.0041398047,0.0028851235,0.008715581,0.0010167825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023002693,0.000010096557,0.0009803523,0.00018978787,0.000018145834,0.00025256444,0.002116415,0.00025269162,0.00039023915,0.5317705,0.407792,0.05620413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016920136,0.000018347413,0.0017903236,0.0002833629,0.000034977817,0.0001429441,0.00063977385,0.00051375944,0.0002832078,0.030324358,0.9658939,0.000058163776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5774714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42252862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032837115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12937993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85003394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983326089","doi":"","title":"A Review of Decisions Rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Criminal Matters: January 1 to November 30, 2017","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal court; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0858502374018159,"score_gpt":0.33936372764448813,"score_spread":0.2535134902426722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983326089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015159264,0.99323833,0.000032830918,0.0018779351,0.0007219012,0.000044254943,0.0006221685,0.0000051804022,0.0033057474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014288683,0.9949767,0.00012715741,0.0018138593,0.00019843274,0.000028205843,0.0003771004,0.000003668269,0.0010458711],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964031,0.00039660808,0.00056543655,0.00020943672,0.0021219915,0.00030340516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843858,0.0036623979,0.0014095182,0.00018729822,0.009690428,0.00066456577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040696408,0.0007672978,0.0021307778,0.01444327,0.0019873504,0.0034834608,0.0017404817,0.0016708402,0.0053568822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019870697,0.0006887482,0.0011326789,0.023285188,0.0016756441,0.0017804845,0.0012675794,0.002157697,0.0009478402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327257,0.000042427186,0.0008086311,0.13161762,0.00036458604,0.00024982827,0.00076295045,0.00022781079,0.00043071917,0.006554074,0.4124684,0.4463402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001645195,0.000023127339,0.0031293978,0.083780855,0.00037274125,0.00010913123,0.00027055276,0.000016358423,0.00011647543,0.00034792925,0.91178745,0.000029575773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61161643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8453669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38838357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025256518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1108333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7813417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984667296","doi":"","title":"An Ounce of Cure for a Pound of Preventive Detention: Security Certificates and the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fluid ounce (US); Charter; Pound (networking); Preventive detention; Computer security; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.037955733711687714,"score_gpt":0.3112380326076232,"score_spread":0.2732822988959355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984667296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015324706,0.010560252,0.0028396263,0.79530615,0.0071853,0.0000985344,0.00029405803,0.00011973528,0.16827159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5036648,0.011299749,0.005124227,0.34511808,0.0049922215,0.00017798132,0.00025575934,0.00009604275,0.12927113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927234,0.0018781648,0.0002696968,0.0004559842,0.0028821675,0.0017905507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265385,0.0039704386,0.000423161,0.00032582486,0.0017553424,0.0008713769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007432762,0.0004283103,0.00030217896,0.00079112244,0.009044389,0.0065136836,0.002170151,0.013420456,0.0031424789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020002026,0.0003780188,0.00049243885,0.0006411637,0.01330882,0.0041502127,0.0027301384,0.01506795,0.0005659803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003875299,0.00003886006,0.0015073323,0.00007318931,0.000008162798,0.00043471012,0.0032978957,0.0002819378,0.00027177235,0.6026582,0.36464056,0.02674867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006785994,0.000100622725,0.0071368534,0.00053507264,0.000039698258,0.00042814668,0.0055675,0.00085945823,0.00107531,0.05216928,0.93188006,0.00014007423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5174192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72457486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5174192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013864992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06973471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9708456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985659700","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1382","title":"Methods and Severity: The Two Tracks of Section 12","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Sentence; Proportionality (law); Charter; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law; Life imprisonment; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Constitution; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11393883092333436,"score_gpt":0.43000025474578124,"score_spread":0.3160614238224469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985659700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055082172,0.011471042,0.23628865,0.1106787,0.0070526456,0.0049304566,0.0048406664,0.0005853736,0.56907034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63618207,0.006756523,0.16320921,0.036210243,0.0027739839,0.0128835095,0.0026102033,0.0005830525,0.13879123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9531944,0.022262787,0.003135409,0.0049792593,0.014450927,0.0019772854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94602007,0.025166042,0.0064347447,0.010235008,0.009896581,0.002247392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036017377,0.0006597586,0.0009395924,0.0034189324,0.0026355092,0.0065049534,0.0025482932,0.0021829428,0.024028536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12308163,0.0008736577,0.0012394453,0.0026914417,0.011466926,0.0076176873,0.0064075785,0.0054298164,0.002821189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024402811,0.000083572064,0.008625363,0.00063127704,0.000058150057,0.000056454686,0.004771316,0.00020270098,0.00052261143,0.83628047,0.029997816,0.1185263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019522801,0.0004232424,0.036608953,0.0027249567,0.00016965326,0.00040013186,0.0049015665,0.001054381,0.002534242,0.5699765,0.38087627,0.00013471599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011274565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016242245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036017377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005590932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013484993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19048035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986280286","doi":"10.29173/mlj1137","title":"Unconstitutional or Just Unworkable? The Life and Death of a Prohibition on Floor-Crossing in Fletcher v The Government of Manitoba","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06354402324846914,"score_gpt":0.30575096659283046,"score_spread":0.24220694334436133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986280286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36549306,0.0041308845,0.0006348165,0.44370347,0.0017449089,0.000093903705,0.00023113178,0.000018637127,0.18394934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8177771,0.0014053652,0.00027133233,0.14228725,0.000321491,0.000059657425,0.00006519923,0.000016924938,0.03779569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931438,0.0016517844,0.00019528007,0.0003983865,0.00087527133,0.0037355542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990877,0.0026717838,0.00078149943,0.00047767503,0.002124968,0.003067027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008475805,0.00034874587,0.00065742177,0.0008515988,0.029746935,0.0067586345,0.0037671798,0.023407025,0.004028097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019567056,0.00085845264,0.0005805248,0.0010627457,0.019691734,0.003368317,0.003978865,0.024959777,0.00042316064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027780797,0.00034292572,0.050962295,0.00012809518,0.00020683285,0.007955128,0.100619115,0.0007937134,0.0013370502,0.6652771,0.15098532,0.021114556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030604014,0.0003854164,0.107210815,0.0027297048,0.00070868514,0.002393624,0.24895412,0.0009925967,0.0031303864,0.11433958,0.51818144,0.000667581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8396538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9452601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16034621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029925194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09693183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.322581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988661056","doi":"10.11575/prism/34113","title":"Minimum or Reasonable Notice of Termination?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Computer science; Environmental science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04443185923288525,"score_gpt":0.2583339876115119,"score_spread":0.21390212837862663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988661056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06181273,0.013447203,0.0733265,0.31766295,0.007999791,0.00062158005,0.0009796164,0.0009614018,0.5231882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84738755,0.0028548,0.02578797,0.089111045,0.0055515263,0.00089420675,0.00044227624,0.00030743872,0.027663209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526358,0.015353273,0.006417114,0.0056285695,0.015246058,0.0047192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9077545,0.060591884,0.0121690035,0.008863441,0.0073657413,0.0032554856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040933006,0.00048340604,0.0014027095,0.0018100818,0.0030588896,0.0065900935,0.004108829,0.01927376,0.009864796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17869471,0.00058686885,0.0014221822,0.0012006835,0.008948102,0.009771771,0.003261217,0.01338349,0.002119609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002472414,0.000120126264,0.003482165,0.00032152026,0.00004122498,0.00062944123,0.0021942563,0.0005394386,0.0007602256,0.90960515,0.032573685,0.049485505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025228973,0.00041002835,0.008590282,0.0016501663,0.0000935537,0.0015106723,0.0016718223,0.0016445757,0.0013675109,0.78692126,0.19570097,0.00018689242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005693525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063485247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040933006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035765453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009398759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21647698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990007664","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919000945","title":"By the Court: Anonymous Judgments at the Supreme Court of Canada Peter McCormick and Marc D. Zanoni, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2019, pp. 269.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014904273218911423,"score_gpt":0.2586889435702533,"score_spread":0.24378467035134188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990007664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036191434,0.091050856,0.0025254115,0.57991624,0.006934921,0.0001750422,0.0023332993,0.000095090225,0.2807778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5671374,0.03890347,0.00300352,0.09617038,0.0027067203,0.00014322782,0.0007862126,0.00027577885,0.29087332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98322564,0.003034451,0.00038123608,0.0010634301,0.009271033,0.0030241173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882118,0.0042614797,0.00042725584,0.0002686289,0.0057960157,0.0010348496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009690595,0.0007714218,0.0007316118,0.0025243808,0.04379568,0.012871482,0.0030406902,0.009989524,0.009233008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03422622,0.00093060866,0.0005244771,0.0055296505,0.012502779,0.005155041,0.0032570036,0.007912762,0.0012584416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005906038,0.0000199722,0.002140405,0.00008767612,0.00003493277,0.000700754,0.013116397,0.00022039817,0.00020396199,0.116810724,0.84274626,0.023859488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042671632,0.0000134273905,0.02164575,0.00096193695,0.00012437369,0.00023021978,0.03697902,0.0007717883,0.0009878734,0.041350383,0.8966304,0.00026214035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9717827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083289996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083289996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10415618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6043141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990141245","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v4i1.91","title":"Children's Charter and Convention Rights in Canada: An Advocacy Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Convention; Political science; Human rights; Law; Constitution; Convention on the Rights of the Child; International human rights law; Ex post facto law; Public administration; Bill of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.016191828367445153,"score_gpt":0.262919791374827,"score_spread":0.24672796300738187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990141245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06666831,0.0250179,0.0031765585,0.32342225,0.00094222766,0.0001581431,0.00036732093,0.0000320435,0.5802152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92088294,0.0142646935,0.0031048022,0.03081758,0.00022586378,0.00009980332,0.000103867154,0.000036428755,0.030464077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857459,0.003112285,0.00029463245,0.0008145707,0.0044481494,0.005584523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871193,0.005936363,0.00091638893,0.0002672909,0.0036704566,0.002090087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010044671,0.00055469346,0.0007511886,0.0041566878,0.037659753,0.020152554,0.0033857746,0.00929964,0.0046811113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015480332,0.00043717163,0.0006037114,0.005682363,0.04900652,0.005947789,0.00556312,0.012222993,0.00018076162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004990253,0.000010773652,0.001428139,0.000046454355,0.000005734868,0.0002279544,0.024090117,0.0001649896,0.0000431519,0.9608977,0.008551663,0.004528277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037708138,0.00003342875,0.012672084,0.00185827,0.00006798414,0.00034052905,0.11867391,0.0009556952,0.00038462487,0.14642143,0.7183749,0.00017943371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99290997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24243568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24243568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34306675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87866724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990366225","doi":"10.3917/rsc.1101.0239","title":"Chronique canadienne - Une décennie de populisme pénal et de contre-réformes en matière punitive au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04488026796265475,"score_gpt":0.31242938902731593,"score_spread":0.26754912106466117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990366225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11985065,0.04602392,0.0023391526,0.099541865,0.0033928514,0.00014477794,0.00397852,0.00025179455,0.7244765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5807621,0.015629642,0.0013067593,0.008694423,0.00032486382,0.00007346338,0.0006789909,0.00014505825,0.39238477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996305,0.0002419884,0.00006265436,0.00032700834,0.0018224282,0.0012408713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965804,0.00031539716,0.00018289612,0.00014072945,0.0017809467,0.0009995628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011664573,0.0005085492,0.00045316562,0.0034870314,0.01807688,0.008250885,0.001114907,0.0015439322,0.018535271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037515264,0.0004290287,0.00031062885,0.008774707,0.009599804,0.0015331915,0.002613182,0.0039047734,0.00089128216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010360836,0.00006704883,0.017086381,0.0003290551,0.000043237662,0.00059615105,0.033908404,0.0010764174,0.0006413615,0.6338892,0.21391474,0.098344535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008776149,0.000011423727,0.031026958,0.00019448664,0.0000129083855,0.00011292063,0.008649792,0.00021941127,0.00017035569,0.004289613,0.95526826,0.000035092482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21723777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92292243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990663109","doi":"","title":"The Institutions of Innocence Review: A Comparative Sociological Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Adversarial system; Law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Consciousness; Perspective (graphical); Criminal law; Political science; Comparative law; Law and economics; Criminology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11057433575268176,"score_gpt":0.40841946823299735,"score_spread":0.2978451324803156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990663109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09083994,0.13735211,0.01097522,0.20751111,0.0016502852,0.00015674779,0.00033145395,0.00014470625,0.55103844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601436,0.026024183,0.0017166717,0.0049264277,0.00095798273,0.00019618649,0.000121610086,0.0000614432,0.0058517987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669535,0.02372902,0.0012032018,0.0011450558,0.0046040425,0.0023652208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8871883,0.08054279,0.0120898485,0.0056574265,0.011253932,0.0032676915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029615564,0.00020587957,0.000836329,0.015131603,0.00682841,0.021472905,0.0022076082,0.0037535,0.0046446007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07997495,0.00045031967,0.00042772907,0.015554312,0.03340516,0.016696341,0.0065611373,0.0024272073,0.00034107352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011286423,0.000017175178,0.0009874476,0.00016769356,0.000013235041,0.000052581057,0.006769924,0.00019814761,0.00003981025,0.9793504,0.004506764,0.00788567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003116257,0.00007527665,0.012419914,0.0021303755,0.000046272602,0.00019907873,0.05337657,0.0006347068,0.00038383383,0.3947247,0.5359226,0.000055460754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100924205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029615564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02185321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022895718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15855688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990731961","doi":"","title":"The Cooperative Relationship between the Police and the Crown Counsel in Canadian Criminal Procedure and its suggestive Ideas","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The korean Association of Police Science Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Criminology; Criminal investigation; Law; Psychology; Criminal procedure; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03879976697601925,"score_gpt":0.352436124190951,"score_spread":0.31363635721493177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990731961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079041675,0.2106492,0.006757509,0.4164742,0.0019081371,0.00040400715,0.0006712247,0.000032300453,0.28406176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191182,0.040323094,0.0029036384,0.027580053,0.0007903728,0.00016645125,0.00010601789,0.000019878118,0.008992179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97512496,0.008326426,0.001347616,0.0025778215,0.009378569,0.0032445765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9129777,0.058041535,0.004074437,0.0021000905,0.019850936,0.0029552798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034370936,0.00050206145,0.0007320142,0.007001451,0.014397065,0.01383115,0.004068984,0.00628879,0.0037638904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10858072,0.0006141148,0.0007251014,0.011698042,0.029202955,0.007381328,0.0033071106,0.0058363103,0.0003030745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001298864,0.000044575907,0.009819124,0.0016047066,0.000156332,0.0003286577,0.014739449,0.00034605004,0.00011097774,0.88828194,0.029539078,0.054899145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030030563,0.00012354832,0.070160165,0.013676903,0.0018845976,0.0010355441,0.077446915,0.001508797,0.00076715316,0.37813973,0.4547366,0.00021970388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9181655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95410156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93542206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06457797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22348398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46854812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991746385","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.002","title":"The disappointing remedy? Damages as a remedy for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Punitive damages; Tort; Law; Human rights; Common law; Proportionality (law); Disappointment; Discretion; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.018075868416494403,"score_gpt":0.29953905966886396,"score_spread":0.28146319125236957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991746385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02650536,0.03093253,0.038566932,0.64699787,0.005387421,0.0001186059,0.00010783497,0.00021992375,0.25116366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554283,0.008463019,0.00957338,0.0654461,0.003415145,0.00010930496,0.000029754772,0.00010053792,0.057434455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751868,0.008910111,0.0011376025,0.003468157,0.009011153,0.0022861008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98603606,0.0070952284,0.0015036564,0.0027252522,0.0017169642,0.0009228285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014509762,0.0005164992,0.00086072145,0.0017431272,0.005625475,0.012810505,0.0022837897,0.017438717,0.0066849054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038767386,0.0005198781,0.0009913306,0.0007893739,0.029195588,0.015540504,0.006333695,0.014745764,0.00092363503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013961985,0.00001534723,0.00029960246,0.000045640827,0.000014292047,0.000074652875,0.00042354342,0.00038590998,0.00022304093,0.97997046,0.008340354,0.010193228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006434812,0.00017929744,0.0016905464,0.0005610314,0.000054313718,0.00050096906,0.0015998554,0.0010866589,0.0011373039,0.7242601,0.26876053,0.0001049973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01147554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076195984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01063617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076735914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991977886","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Ottawa Convention’s Obligations to Landmine Victims","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mine action; Convention; Law; Political science; Aeronautics; Criminology; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.08620748438187222,"score_gpt":0.2918734776836435,"score_spread":0.20566599330177132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991977886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2641696,0.008858746,0.0034905963,0.20258722,0.0005140598,0.00020583159,0.000499976,0.000029744846,0.51964426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638803,0.0029925853,0.0015650758,0.008953025,0.00007828842,0.00006650053,0.00006396355,0.000009907145,0.022390418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017566,0.002750725,0.00070095493,0.00062903226,0.002718958,0.0030246146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824989,0.007170228,0.0024179358,0.0010107703,0.0054422445,0.00145993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008883376,0.00038563804,0.00039940435,0.0023842712,0.016502285,0.0121880965,0.0027076001,0.007229262,0.0041704085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02528883,0.0006722766,0.00040909473,0.001307599,0.020389803,0.007683451,0.006059526,0.007204336,0.00037618075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047083202,0.00004755201,0.021521451,0.00015398816,0.00003398418,0.0010370176,0.041910693,0.0007427147,0.0004233853,0.89328814,0.026373243,0.014420746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000354987,0.00009690964,0.0860187,0.002379391,0.00018411347,0.0011817524,0.14384967,0.001699218,0.002611526,0.21700989,0.5444119,0.00052138825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8551154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9453364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8551154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04830419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104732655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35047305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992267669","doi":"","title":"Research on the Modification of Chinese Death Penalty Review Proceedings: Comments on Chinese Criminal Procedure Amendment on the Death Penalty Review Procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal procedure; Law; Process (computing); Realization (probability); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26062390785496464,"score_gpt":0.4670355043222729,"score_spread":0.20641159646730828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992267669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052003857,0.0071596857,0.008457691,0.8190081,0.011211088,0.0009372477,0.00018418719,0.00013077004,0.10090737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46095452,0.0055971816,0.011102799,0.46883518,0.00852405,0.0011387673,0.000105136176,0.00009946597,0.043642804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8895617,0.040889617,0.013008097,0.010643288,0.038153794,0.0077434294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6562101,0.231113,0.020228833,0.012052894,0.07649008,0.003905037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12382361,0.00066989165,0.00081300974,0.002843487,0.013417072,0.010104871,0.0061575808,0.023256809,0.004528619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32999712,0.00074134476,0.0014463685,0.0031502217,0.021506095,0.009387383,0.00440038,0.01696254,0.0009967866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015895948,0.00013348403,0.007660119,0.0008527289,0.000056878336,0.0019959037,0.0450802,0.0006252791,0.0032985313,0.6603191,0.23212388,0.04769485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018187755,0.00048152785,0.03796416,0.0031723804,0.00023986418,0.0010313345,0.031991865,0.002589434,0.0056069857,0.04521916,0.87072957,0.0007917567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07490074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08562013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12382361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018710667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06670146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65484965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992558985","doi":"10.3968/11128","title":"Diversion Mechanism of the Criminal Produces in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Mechanism (biology); China; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal procedure; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02018850688681668,"score_gpt":0.2794011103095935,"score_spread":0.25921260342277685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992558985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791059,0.00055488787,0.0009615513,0.00094661856,0.000019888703,0.000048365997,0.00013934038,0.000021232721,0.018202294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351585,0.00041752844,0.00038431888,0.00008419451,0.000012388386,0.000012350872,0.000101571146,0.000003779808,0.005468022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896884,0.0000830535,0.00007066946,0.00014474458,0.00042842008,0.00030431294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990602,0.00009709817,0.00030600434,0.00009032057,0.00028739538,0.00015900085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013126595,0.00025746826,0.0003570292,0.0032782012,0.0028512634,0.0015607919,0.0009241201,0.0005802089,0.0034589896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013627463,0.00026807847,0.000518979,0.0026027248,0.0018002293,0.0009387204,0.0017724541,0.00047912227,0.00015974458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028268108,0.00027467273,0.70136636,0.0004956095,0.0002287728,0.0076194108,0.00530682,0.012954122,0.0061341333,0.13308586,0.0069266413,0.12532498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087220236,0.00023178132,0.8939104,0.00016693897,0.00019600465,0.0015252656,0.0030581264,0.025966521,0.003286004,0.029724449,0.041738823,0.000108553766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08562134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11137774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08562134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004982745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063414387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17024595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992746368","doi":"","title":"The Duty of Fairness in the Administrative Investigation Process in Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Duty; Law; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.08092247987961074,"score_gpt":0.38612331294261637,"score_spread":0.3052008330630056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992746368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09070162,0.009033768,0.03261651,0.37208542,0.0021621927,0.00049789157,0.00030465005,0.00014464965,0.49245325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454713,0.001398437,0.013931536,0.01707075,0.0004683545,0.00015318932,0.000048337675,0.00008339059,0.021374771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8573053,0.05320117,0.007468661,0.009549612,0.04682625,0.025649028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8515493,0.085236795,0.0037138192,0.006689804,0.043771952,0.00903834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09349284,0.00075137295,0.0021547372,0.007136255,0.06237712,0.03181557,0.006739708,0.02164727,0.0047196974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21081613,0.0019585663,0.0014285798,0.0064797574,0.058563523,0.00843356,0.009123417,0.019505346,0.0004205341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003066595,0.000017908387,0.001502924,0.0000645462,0.0000242549,0.00013770419,0.014661752,0.00064929697,0.00010303531,0.96119297,0.009361684,0.012253285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001409499,0.000059669077,0.018525457,0.0011589706,0.00021881648,0.00026830222,0.015419151,0.0055492055,0.00081593555,0.7325578,0.22475146,0.00053438405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97504234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98010147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79975706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20024295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43540227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9276048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993690901","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1367","title":"“All Arabs Are Liars”: Arab and Muslim Stereotypes in Canadian Human Rights Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Terrorism; Racialization; Conviction; Tribunal; Political science; Existentialism; Citizenship; Islam; Law; Islamophobia; Sociology; Criminology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03567727920030854,"score_gpt":0.3483544763090948,"score_spread":0.3126771971087862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993690901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83579713,0.0024402377,0.00035182794,0.027131809,0.00014573126,0.000054451997,0.00019050999,0.000015022014,0.1338733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945082,0.00069832685,0.00011055543,0.001382084,0.000010399116,0.0000054167876,0.000027906126,0.0000055951664,0.0032514588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995747,0.0005943827,0.00009579219,0.00027487578,0.0016466122,0.0016413318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392045,0.0017122567,0.0005242006,0.00023892322,0.0024851407,0.0011190927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046741827,0.000311171,0.0003138979,0.0034688555,0.04011111,0.0073194453,0.0017753046,0.0019540286,0.005042588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010404587,0.0003863922,0.00026151052,0.004178494,0.020111768,0.0025197254,0.0039522992,0.0037279443,0.00020011686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011783414,0.00013811792,0.120710485,0.00018683184,0.000039770108,0.0012793051,0.62025887,0.00031708507,0.0009129755,0.17454474,0.02386787,0.057626177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022361797,0.000032860342,0.149352,0.00048510905,0.000058108617,0.0003326642,0.7566228,0.00065990054,0.00069346663,0.009065827,0.08252363,0.00015122333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99689496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10883916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10883916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114816725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7896871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993890907","doi":"10.71781/23059","title":"La perception des juges à l'égard des hommes et des femmes trafiquants de drogue au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.17608602461312328,"score_gpt":0.43689374106868123,"score_spread":0.26080771645555795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993890907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942773,0.00018979014,0.000113630056,0.00064169127,0.000009644582,0.0000073661954,0.00010478949,0.0000023423643,0.004653477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610966,0.00033223382,0.00007100397,0.00011149717,0.0000038793646,0.000009794488,0.000060295122,0.0000017320148,0.0032998447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945194,0.00012368198,0.00001567109,0.000054039454,0.0001571841,0.00019743884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977089,0.00032908615,0.00036574842,0.00007563014,0.0009999512,0.0005207651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095745584,0.00020895539,0.00025193318,0.000918892,0.0038691428,0.0021031538,0.00038624104,0.00045360147,0.0056705615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029058799,0.00015585985,0.00018055628,0.0011716885,0.0020102512,0.0009308711,0.0010379431,0.0008616019,0.00030157054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009893667,0.000058341084,0.75195754,0.000080247926,0.0000589253,0.00034108764,0.21855783,0.0002286009,0.0010148812,0.002157085,0.0025947343,0.022851788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015686652,0.00003509283,0.8060672,0.00006319542,0.000014625326,0.00006529859,0.18874894,0.00014028969,0.00011127131,0.00012244479,0.0046095657,0.00002040698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9132469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95559615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08675307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069521554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00517541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17452788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994542279","doi":"","title":"The \"Report on Prosecution\" in the Light of Canadian Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. John's law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.039732358542612305,"score_gpt":0.35759035666456995,"score_spread":0.31785799812195764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994542279","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005236597,0.06521376,0.000993453,0.76689184,0.05134766,0.00043579127,0.0110629,0.00034808717,0.09846993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13112833,0.15891738,0.0069183656,0.48581254,0.026832828,0.0009103964,0.016509619,0.0007051825,0.17226526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96102077,0.0028375888,0.002321938,0.001429967,0.027670532,0.004719247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8306246,0.01976597,0.0053062257,0.0023906133,0.12942655,0.012486142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024751535,0.0011857806,0.0010676084,0.011057634,0.007305077,0.011215144,0.0043330737,0.010913837,0.00951442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1043021,0.00063284737,0.0016415376,0.01194816,0.0036521447,0.0027599905,0.0025863342,0.009147403,0.0019670087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022319025,0.000007841345,0.0010467988,0.0004885679,0.000022023813,0.00007937776,0.00032430058,0.000067596324,0.0000783942,0.0073716985,0.97722876,0.0132622635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027292688,0.00003129904,0.018152151,0.0023668818,0.0001402315,0.00009691049,0.0013734467,0.00016508644,0.00034173805,0.0016906818,0.9755525,0.000061887105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9548181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06475447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06475447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31024256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46982878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995259627","doi":"10.29173/mlj1141","title":"Bill 16: Manitoba’s Change to the Fatality Inquiries Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.12264929914032842,"score_gpt":0.34239694565009343,"score_spread":0.21974764650976503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995259627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009477401,0.003108123,0.0015701259,0.6711031,0.029979065,0.0015244357,0.004367613,0.0010184672,0.27785155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01238997,0.0005303545,0.0012657561,0.5690783,0.0019962508,0.0007054268,0.00049349264,0.00014953031,0.41339087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97779435,0.0021266819,0.0012269996,0.0021827754,0.0098525835,0.0068166186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96443695,0.008329862,0.0016673472,0.0018399034,0.014435819,0.009290203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015895832,0.0019440168,0.0021598192,0.0025295937,0.023066215,0.014375822,0.009260774,0.08959907,0.04311261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05395679,0.0045510796,0.0031342336,0.0018192347,0.0067316717,0.0032961126,0.0061881756,0.039651673,0.023372915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009267101,0.00019856753,0.0021858588,0.000074539916,0.00004996171,0.0006289866,0.0006871918,0.0001853856,0.00052744045,0.018615503,0.9725113,0.0042424547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024370606,0.00009190579,0.012192125,0.00045479686,0.000104156905,0.00019074585,0.0011251157,0.00041572074,0.0004063575,0.0024809334,0.98207986,0.00021470935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8516464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9422991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14835358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0457712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22161874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33209485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995332741","doi":"10.71781/1787","title":"La constitutionnalité du par. 515(6) du Code criminel et d’autres sujets touchant la libération provisoire au Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.010094602154413018,"score_gpt":0.21188935215780585,"score_spread":0.20179475000339284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995332741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036092035,0.0071282377,0.005864952,0.05090259,0.0057081,0.0005573455,0.005088231,0.00038298708,0.8882755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16985871,0.0025616852,0.004845085,0.034816097,0.00057453656,0.0002981337,0.0018932152,0.00024156975,0.78491104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99181163,0.00049469556,0.00034641614,0.00081209716,0.003828324,0.0027069068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931467,0.0014271534,0.0003064795,0.00034158104,0.004045746,0.0007323475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031344453,0.0005333844,0.00041472152,0.0012917897,0.011418667,0.006740091,0.0018679429,0.008163994,0.019235266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008736427,0.00066842174,0.00089696754,0.0014439091,0.0036935527,0.0013437574,0.0018797267,0.0078525115,0.0039275177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000998375,0.00006173558,0.00425782,0.00017898776,0.0000216947,0.00055224594,0.009150472,0.000373121,0.0021726927,0.5384341,0.41523004,0.029467223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105732015,0.000013139439,0.006862097,0.00012103158,0.000015005238,0.000075470394,0.0013878439,0.00012658926,0.00046519094,0.0025915948,0.9882835,0.0000479169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94442546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9625682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055574536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040657826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10434106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29499453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995976599","doi":"","title":"A comparative analysis of the \"connection\" and the standing threshold requirements under section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter and section 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Constitution; Law; Connection (principal bundle); Position (finance); Political science; Economics; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.17041157001336582,"score_gpt":0.3301689180096998,"score_spread":0.15975734799633395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995976599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16592973,0.017174305,0.0044022584,0.015545625,0.00023609244,0.00026271158,0.00047733114,0.000021421038,0.79595053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97311836,0.0059282603,0.0027477695,0.0020211588,0.00008010448,0.00009474165,0.00019771802,0.000009638281,0.015802296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98412055,0.002391025,0.00036424855,0.0005001037,0.009466075,0.003158059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894168,0.004554473,0.00093331566,0.00032950434,0.004355219,0.0004106477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052381656,0.0001950371,0.00032708124,0.0041771075,0.005455879,0.0051511587,0.0013071601,0.0021271007,0.004540957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019839395,0.00027930678,0.00059550436,0.005757489,0.0066989437,0.0018931095,0.0016427947,0.0023731196,0.000255173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000628152,0.000023159913,0.0038231667,0.00017481412,0.000025554575,0.00027576945,0.0030039446,0.00062763493,0.00047079468,0.96289515,0.006564069,0.022053154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015085039,0.00042300986,0.33538172,0.0017744025,0.00070160744,0.0009346335,0.020244118,0.004486801,0.003399508,0.22066262,0.4115829,0.00025785598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7763973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9121733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22360271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03497663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067827836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44983906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996337360","doi":"10.71781/1810","title":"L'introduction d'un régime de responsabilité civile pour le préjudice écologique dans le corpus juridique québécois","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027062294480429655,"score_gpt":0.32009042145695893,"score_spread":0.29302812697652925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996337360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2272633,0.017968616,0.0507214,0.05307272,0.0027099366,0.0005550312,0.0064063095,0.00033551076,0.6409672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7602802,0.005135426,0.020507893,0.003502854,0.00045757997,0.0008137594,0.0014526467,0.0001831018,0.20766652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874663,0.0004155158,0.000049904735,0.00018745114,0.00035526464,0.00024526773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966472,0.0011600343,0.00021317697,0.00023393915,0.0014782294,0.0002674287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021332246,0.0005706912,0.0005238129,0.0040656286,0.010198141,0.005390659,0.0013094322,0.0014138981,0.020838497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00486014,0.0002876538,0.00047244577,0.004340455,0.005326695,0.002196376,0.0016380682,0.0030944366,0.001021656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046143174,0.000028386807,0.013354805,0.00037809357,0.00003096772,0.00026584425,0.048362892,0.0010655754,0.0011993932,0.82773775,0.04554494,0.0619852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016258216,0.000026973332,0.09246378,0.0010045727,0.000042069416,0.00021085623,0.030088145,0.0021616279,0.0006476305,0.031777356,0.84143305,0.0001276797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89586484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.946841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104135156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046153132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03101298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33486593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996441726","doi":"","title":"Healing Ourselves: Interrogating the underutilization of Sections 81 & 84 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Indigenous; Legislature; Representation (politics); Service (business); Legislative history; Political science; Business; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.05087026599923574,"score_gpt":0.3607802419133256,"score_spread":0.30990997591408986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996441726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5394223,0.0035634083,0.0025513545,0.34149027,0.00065655,0.00015695395,0.00007991812,0.000038590013,0.112040654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9114768,0.00133001,0.0008396996,0.0780633,0.00019828991,0.0001119475,0.000021924016,0.00004471518,0.007913355],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9494308,0.028056435,0.0025226455,0.002970544,0.009278476,0.0077410275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90048563,0.07278302,0.008106684,0.0032311915,0.011785021,0.0036084417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052437477,0.00033728514,0.00054579816,0.0021891815,0.04180764,0.017735718,0.004550961,0.017463,0.0019443858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07904986,0.0009272454,0.00048596878,0.0026559972,0.049306557,0.010272635,0.008995357,0.023793172,0.00027338316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023936003,0.000059738384,0.004509423,0.00007309303,0.000009693985,0.0013308636,0.7836065,0.00007236227,0.00044262302,0.18915363,0.011385184,0.009333032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121710455,0.00004518471,0.0063443338,0.0006259343,0.000030927284,0.000541165,0.81756556,0.00027792997,0.0008948881,0.020612737,0.15296543,0.00008374085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4016333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5043077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59836674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040634796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07582534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.798591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996573978","doi":"10.7202/1066351ar","title":"Du principe de proportionnalité en droit pénal","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010456653925060917,"score_gpt":0.2610593010917604,"score_spread":0.2506026471666995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996573978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014957213,0.0035339224,0.3872231,0.02106643,0.0013646864,0.00019749906,0.00055157096,0.00028230925,0.5708232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70924973,0.0042184102,0.15174147,0.011576869,0.0026883287,0.0012144586,0.00042760372,0.0005196206,0.11836351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989498,0.004078661,0.00059254136,0.0022241187,0.0029826895,0.0006239884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929524,0.002530809,0.00082606106,0.002029121,0.0014498294,0.00021171408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091526555,0.0006949267,0.0006280479,0.0022789075,0.002838524,0.005803311,0.0020324558,0.0025318493,0.012117589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016989274,0.0005676321,0.001495785,0.0014738721,0.022564631,0.008094856,0.0045694835,0.007535524,0.002991671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035673218,0.0000037025359,0.00012758702,0.000018948751,0.000005024928,0.000011696218,0.00024187112,0.00012443312,0.000037429112,0.99632,0.00077695464,0.0023288142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015371668,0.000043072647,0.0006344764,0.000105328065,0.000015009527,0.0002600208,0.00015552026,0.00071777345,0.00042978296,0.90614927,0.09145442,0.00001984972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033504427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028553812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012117589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028440251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024604273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048404396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997343504","doi":"10.71781/1615","title":"Responsabilité civile en cas de diffamation sur Internet : étude comparative entre les systèmes québécois et français","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013343040529097705,"score_gpt":0.22852587103234734,"score_spread":0.21518283050324963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997343504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561855,0.000782655,0.00045988205,0.002174528,0.00003339559,0.000041699925,0.00022208813,0.000014427128,0.04008576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99208647,0.00025790592,0.00010530271,0.00013323117,0.000004469528,0.000015822732,0.00007305,0.0000057642133,0.0073179104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976018,0.0006394976,0.000069920796,0.00026042998,0.0005358923,0.00089246663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921043,0.0020362372,0.0009971443,0.00030496973,0.0029831608,0.0015741283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027262296,0.00032167629,0.0003832936,0.002235832,0.008878834,0.0075521967,0.0009967188,0.0012092256,0.009450786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067709857,0.0003194453,0.00039454064,0.0039727455,0.0058163526,0.0027673403,0.002517308,0.0015034633,0.0005872902],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013361545,0.00015643338,0.34684423,0.0002100976,0.000112329915,0.0014205732,0.51277995,0.0009942332,0.0011280812,0.07124996,0.010824473,0.054146126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018188593,0.000061941944,0.4221709,0.00023408825,0.00006176528,0.00028678973,0.46777025,0.0014611812,0.00033725591,0.0021059697,0.10540467,0.00008703208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93984216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9455262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060157835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044207837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026162883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32075185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997523092","doi":"","title":"“Mr. Big” Confessions, R v Hart, and a Proposal for a New Right of Appeal based upon Fundamental Post-conviction Changes to the Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038975463143340584,"score_gpt":0.38101995867310423,"score_spread":0.3420444955297636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997523092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0515388,0.0061781267,0.04920069,0.4888539,0.0101357605,0.0010248985,0.0005144326,0.00056517264,0.39198816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43599275,0.0023334324,0.043719433,0.3586786,0.004083786,0.0008412635,0.00032338066,0.00014179462,0.1538855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97463685,0.005661176,0.001821918,0.0048811906,0.009849543,0.0031493523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97614735,0.0143180685,0.0011517955,0.0030277576,0.0036290013,0.0017260892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02632282,0.00041979356,0.00073178404,0.0012023344,0.0057688663,0.010351383,0.0041775834,0.031625263,0.0038188088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05439685,0.0009374727,0.0013655904,0.00071403245,0.01753098,0.0077862516,0.004368596,0.025824308,0.0012821766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004405912,0.0000819428,0.0006290726,0.000048104022,0.000013206963,0.0004962824,0.001469092,0.00016079741,0.0008750858,0.9296591,0.05244017,0.014083109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035458952,0.0004202619,0.0050635254,0.00063921424,0.00014399359,0.0016653484,0.00163678,0.0024239342,0.002877508,0.49299943,0.49141482,0.00036057993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03790119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06911607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96209884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058501773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025363084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1392101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998625737","doi":"","title":"La présomption absolue de préjudice au consommateur : la lumière sur certaines controverses","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028412074002838038,"score_gpt":0.31126330876618463,"score_spread":0.2828512347633466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998625737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07964351,0.048891112,0.019105818,0.26524115,0.0019297848,0.000052453757,0.00010224321,0.000055009197,0.5849789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090708,0.01963155,0.002537117,0.027574016,0.0020585752,0.00007870397,0.000049240225,0.00009342264,0.038906604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877198,0.0042327438,0.00039364566,0.0017403081,0.0042304015,0.0016832574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890147,0.006866608,0.0008544556,0.0008150621,0.0020291025,0.00042011356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009247216,0.00048466885,0.0006106348,0.0019226128,0.015052919,0.0155636165,0.0022477894,0.008461227,0.00580693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01590663,0.000328625,0.00072178355,0.0023375922,0.048882734,0.009046223,0.005518784,0.016144698,0.0008640939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009786086,0.000006640923,0.00037657045,0.0000484882,0.000005811848,0.000092483344,0.011028909,0.0000530245,0.0001325813,0.9779002,0.0026000128,0.007745504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001922413,0.00005699986,0.005660598,0.001202994,0.000041011746,0.0004160175,0.037181623,0.0006404863,0.0015968514,0.58335114,0.36974594,0.00008712777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061399918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06218387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061399918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014267174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012769024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122085035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999488397","doi":"","title":"De zucht naar vrijheid","year":2019,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.04338430485135986,"score_gpt":0.2938159514711914,"score_spread":0.2504316466198315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999488397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056082937,0.022853266,0.002752419,0.006769301,0.0016649558,0.000029397783,0.0013313695,0.00014658156,0.9588445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10270531,0.01679853,0.004613374,0.0011314523,0.0002780372,0.00008271406,0.00103802,0.00063871295,0.8727138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987174,0.00026015172,0.000064913314,0.00023679087,0.0005667277,0.00015405865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996383,0.00014167509,0.000045405064,0.00004881204,0.000089846064,0.00003589234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000563221,0.00047983025,0.00046059754,0.0011343354,0.001867132,0.006146102,0.000609118,0.0011736824,0.105181634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002535326,0.0004221413,0.00021004646,0.0019261652,0.0019793825,0.002853477,0.0016962561,0.0017965819,0.020127388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038110327,0.00003411288,0.00039460874,0.00052361365,0.000018110026,0.000370206,0.0060839755,0.00043004585,0.0010299302,0.5765651,0.23623714,0.17827517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017003347,0.0000027457127,0.00019599329,0.00013561423,0.0000023631724,0.00010084657,0.00036571315,0.00004175183,0.00014838223,0.005384984,0.9936154,0.0000044402036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037667003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07592819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105181634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003871531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030867558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35186762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000048186","doi":"10.7202/1066337ar","title":"David a déjà vaincu Goliath ... L’efficacité de la protection contre les clauses abusives selon un paradigme de prévention : inspirations du droit belge","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021551056165149518,"score_gpt":0.2801893528066505,"score_spread":0.258638296641501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000048186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0479804,0.050250072,0.010221784,0.31046283,0.0058882637,0.00009588384,0.00045843105,0.00020840508,0.5744339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5704231,0.017109975,0.0048315697,0.030666294,0.00068476907,0.000071538954,0.00017970044,0.00021393628,0.3758192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997844,0.0008607995,0.000042021507,0.00025795778,0.00061515515,0.00038016148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822634,0.00054241106,0.00021289987,0.0000805742,0.0006876669,0.00025006814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017135824,0.00048647952,0.00028566198,0.0011496586,0.00763022,0.0064802947,0.00076173147,0.0025614798,0.016392082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031787222,0.00028086948,0.0003004903,0.001044883,0.009567263,0.0023392276,0.0015365903,0.0031201567,0.003064394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007179469,0.00004018052,0.004671618,0.0002731478,0.000026139756,0.00030254174,0.02479213,0.00047722517,0.0006179119,0.6513571,0.23989856,0.07747171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013595533,0.000020205038,0.0049327253,0.00036623777,0.00001521665,0.00014669208,0.0069169234,0.00025087598,0.00046989412,0.01599969,0.97083586,0.00003219037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36552548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4581667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36552548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015318325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014712804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7267958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004388379","doi":"","title":"5.2 British Columbia’s Police Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Business; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08124052963988004,"score_gpt":0.3495800070203647,"score_spread":0.26833947738048464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004388379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028940573,0.0039863787,0.0011706896,0.042527355,0.0039014837,0.00047846837,0.010555189,0.0002953076,0.90814453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09754822,0.0013061828,0.0014647637,0.064417645,0.0003810293,0.00030822546,0.0021135728,0.000072400595,0.8323879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961539,0.00036663783,0.00016402587,0.00029465195,0.0017251779,0.0012955775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955729,0.00066487544,0.000121176614,0.00021997691,0.0027451403,0.00067587406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016953407,0.0006284383,0.00045604783,0.0027914073,0.012042371,0.0061250567,0.0017729754,0.010747972,0.026606418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069750194,0.0006924536,0.00084217964,0.0015824995,0.0013990159,0.0009959651,0.0017797947,0.006052443,0.007202068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010549808,0.00009546422,0.006720473,0.0001834598,0.000030626652,0.0005484015,0.0015291634,0.00045987696,0.0009908443,0.06962575,0.89189243,0.02781794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004099864,0.00004397111,0.033700053,0.0003069539,0.000058162666,0.00012460566,0.0017066249,0.00034204853,0.0009166504,0.002991248,0.9596778,0.000090875525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92718416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072815835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025983894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04923462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18852723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005898092","doi":"10.4000/crdf.3790","title":"La motivation des actes administratifs au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Activation Laboratories; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Port (circuit theory); Philosophy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.13088218499887594,"score_gpt":0.35437466266818624,"score_spread":0.2234924776693103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005898092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80840635,0.0029866965,0.0017790756,0.021398181,0.00016282822,0.00013076817,0.0012092758,0.000060559178,0.16386628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627252,0.0016645719,0.00068658974,0.00091040647,0.000021848648,0.000039678718,0.00026164463,0.000022114986,0.03366803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938514,0.0011588142,0.0001420725,0.00031180884,0.0029194274,0.001616467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98887104,0.001980093,0.0013295569,0.0002401395,0.0044816006,0.0030975789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002577885,0.00023942374,0.00042405288,0.0023544354,0.008602048,0.005774325,0.00089878804,0.0010039447,0.008686466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00882068,0.00026325966,0.00038345717,0.003224772,0.004159881,0.0009871799,0.0018359692,0.0017839422,0.0005171095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022044385,0.00045153016,0.39620554,0.0004664136,0.00020893282,0.00065927213,0.15777986,0.0022563871,0.0018290633,0.17956403,0.055734653,0.20462394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017748012,0.000093241404,0.6545418,0.00046818645,0.000042419517,0.00010532718,0.098889135,0.0008688829,0.00066460227,0.003330162,0.2408506,0.0001278459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98094326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92412764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075872354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12163258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.550495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006647981","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0066","title":"Criminal law as public ordering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Order (exchange); Law; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Verb; Noun; Philosophy of law; Leverage (statistics); Phrase; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05364129303452982,"score_gpt":0.2770848625728848,"score_spread":0.22344356953835495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006647981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025496101,0.0018246089,0.009274307,0.027930524,0.00029598043,0.000050527164,0.0001227819,0.00009620374,0.93490887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657173,0.0011333534,0.002114312,0.0030475124,0.00032502442,0.000054388714,0.0000910956,0.000055950295,0.027461061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242544,0.0024972623,0.0003437215,0.00092627085,0.0023926164,0.0014147596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904681,0.0040946873,0.0012704021,0.0023000436,0.0012835668,0.00058323913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046925736,0.00034627027,0.00043707291,0.0022430026,0.007836497,0.014893841,0.0013565982,0.0052020093,0.009464491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012945729,0.00047751254,0.0004171187,0.0028997862,0.05776023,0.011581892,0.0057179937,0.004958216,0.0008425114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014325469,0.0000035449586,0.00016546734,0.0000067458705,6.066775e-7,0.000034882043,0.001271559,0.000044960398,0.000012262416,0.9959228,0.0010449719,0.0014907814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010408318,0.000013583255,0.0011944206,0.00013614804,0.000010604478,0.00020843057,0.0033394818,0.00038265006,0.00020852621,0.85812,0.13636157,0.000014011762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048987936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057184473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048987936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01801858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015562031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13073456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006657236","doi":"","title":"De PlayStation-moorden : Over bewijs van medeplegen","year":2019,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012530153990842294,"score_gpt":0.2449326698551782,"score_spread":0.2324025158643359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006657236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12140801,0.0358764,0.0047571156,0.12923668,0.0036294295,0.00010223964,0.00048369647,0.00009860705,0.7044079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80530393,0.01374161,0.0015217488,0.014488296,0.00085108186,0.0001321907,0.0002576203,0.00014957043,0.16355403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911724,0.0057691657,0.00024495277,0.00062055903,0.0011617703,0.0010312976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922059,0.00420979,0.00069849985,0.00033522554,0.00067736156,0.0018731763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054436387,0.00034045806,0.00036495988,0.00097391853,0.006686672,0.008405316,0.00093524193,0.0023496598,0.024305988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018708045,0.00035268362,0.00017946635,0.0012801565,0.010848453,0.007068061,0.0062258667,0.0043576728,0.0034724295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034869713,0.00011839691,0.005690753,0.00062443735,0.0000396431,0.0017435929,0.18513727,0.00014191488,0.0007289608,0.4686744,0.19812895,0.13862304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024248513,0.00007704927,0.008055405,0.0014234196,0.000021246178,0.00072119985,0.12103491,0.000104763814,0.00052948046,0.034741733,0.8332373,0.000029189408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011878297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030051123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024305988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004286535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064113527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08131164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006896565","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3370335","title":"A ‘Bad Rap’: R. v. Skeete and the Admissibility of Rap Lyric Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admissible evidence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030864749628063123,"score_gpt":0.3434884430731081,"score_spread":0.312623693445045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006896565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24300998,0.013440678,0.025419423,0.25811592,0.0015621125,0.00022139847,0.0001957113,0.00017123234,0.4578635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96864724,0.0013610213,0.004238683,0.013843633,0.000281248,0.000032667172,0.000018754956,0.00002126458,0.011555482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97542316,0.010340308,0.0013175722,0.001927765,0.008219316,0.0027719233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9356074,0.042743314,0.0055426606,0.004301128,0.009718613,0.0020868378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030375022,0.00029176063,0.00068940094,0.0023554482,0.01032499,0.00911083,0.0023374776,0.0075762803,0.0028383136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1320191,0.0004623554,0.00051233283,0.0012077263,0.019115452,0.0051960265,0.004097547,0.009216347,0.0005787406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002439803,0.000030528397,0.0110737635,0.00023997108,0.000078376455,0.0020817984,0.021595158,0.0007146988,0.0011231155,0.8749408,0.024147172,0.063730605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010697049,0.00041258562,0.039266393,0.002516678,0.00041075767,0.0042871423,0.0334556,0.0055494662,0.006745383,0.579968,0.32693258,0.00034845757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103820324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21374315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103820324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00605388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127178095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20643204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007369708","doi":"","title":"Evidence Disclosure and Discovery in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Scrutiny; Political science; Common law; Law; Possession (linguistics); Norm (philosophy); Right to counsel; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02887404506583387,"score_gpt":0.3345006115399106,"score_spread":0.30562656647407677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007369708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035565977,0.23629186,0.03893477,0.03627451,0.002242113,0.00022958708,0.0001341853,0.000099275494,0.6822371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30609193,0.3147169,0.0496043,0.035558157,0.009337362,0.0013835747,0.00035097837,0.0002625705,0.28269425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874605,0.006015218,0.00082946767,0.0010644179,0.0033730022,0.0012574339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98814875,0.0098610865,0.0004826065,0.0006746056,0.0005874601,0.00024551837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009179514,0.00057747826,0.0009997474,0.0032113192,0.0037665442,0.01086358,0.0021850315,0.006955988,0.017687336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014556618,0.0005431615,0.0008561413,0.0047566784,0.024415705,0.013166616,0.005378141,0.00646828,0.0023478533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027768037,0.000005834177,0.000043664455,0.00008109573,0.0000020772363,0.000038087866,0.00058720954,0.00013074718,0.000016264172,0.98376495,0.0066916,0.008635642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005022592,0.000022925044,0.00025586496,0.00082221074,0.0000037342572,0.00020524308,0.00061323086,0.0003174727,0.00007368113,0.6595482,0.33811516,0.000017203321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056788805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046932064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017687336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007918791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008697539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059170067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010798493","doi":"10.3917/apd.611.0104","title":"Quelle garantie de justice pour les modes extrajudiciaires de règlement des conflits ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de philosophie du droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05014452592502678,"score_gpt":0.3075960574460871,"score_spread":0.2574515315210603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010798493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08651907,0.015733931,0.10229993,0.19319522,0.001392521,0.000120393,0.00015377601,0.00021128221,0.6003739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561887,0.0022962403,0.010421556,0.005471509,0.0006579717,0.0001319023,0.000042811298,0.00010512237,0.024684126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810775,0.011073562,0.00069591624,0.0024367007,0.0029660386,0.0017502734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98209745,0.008026523,0.0016680645,0.0037172975,0.0032855913,0.0012050737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020718627,0.0006544898,0.0010960657,0.0022949304,0.009269756,0.019993741,0.002267828,0.008314988,0.008092754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025984023,0.0006356691,0.0009107691,0.0014976963,0.080382735,0.01844591,0.0076179723,0.012037958,0.0015094524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000832484,0.0000058836536,0.00023903715,0.0000245098,0.000006876845,0.00002625511,0.0051464583,0.000040529238,0.00008504522,0.99028426,0.0007148851,0.003417914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003534618,0.000043678017,0.0011659936,0.00035271983,0.00002721165,0.00022004041,0.0086245565,0.00029109503,0.0003715382,0.9092108,0.07961332,0.00004364113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121268965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013380815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020718627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008096866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009820925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109571815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011425559","doi":"","title":"After the Revolution: Being Pragmatic and Functional in Canada's TrialCourts and Courts of Appeal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020031224354271904,"score_gpt":0.23854932586225394,"score_spread":0.21851810150798204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011425559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14713326,0.003346601,0.004582668,0.41079435,0.0018266089,0.00025736736,0.0002625521,0.00014255813,0.43165407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647765,0.00044480836,0.001624676,0.062061623,0.0003957832,0.00011280422,0.00006370382,0.00019398956,0.07032619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93385404,0.017634507,0.0013142244,0.005690282,0.016810235,0.024696767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93843275,0.022710191,0.0023048902,0.0032581096,0.018959422,0.014334766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048124522,0.0006465393,0.0015998122,0.003311302,0.08140901,0.046271052,0.006649716,0.031909075,0.011269664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112830155,0.0014263449,0.0011757347,0.0047650128,0.074713096,0.012844712,0.013836732,0.033619415,0.0008776217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104203136,0.00005662736,0.0031239467,0.000054224896,0.000035738412,0.00029287045,0.051558822,0.00027751143,0.00019335913,0.8761891,0.051252812,0.016860783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022640856,0.00011883166,0.020925153,0.0005514938,0.00021688303,0.0001528016,0.08599367,0.0009153811,0.000713211,0.2359175,0.65390444,0.00036431215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95424026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83494407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16505592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39478633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9684168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011836690","doi":"10.29173/alr2593","title":"Enjoy the Silence: Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Silence; Cornerstone; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043481721992379034,"score_gpt":0.30365045602737956,"score_spread":0.2601687340350005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011836690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20837165,0.06863837,0.0052215736,0.22913814,0.0026365598,0.00022183952,0.00056129816,0.00014666333,0.4850639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87240803,0.018383972,0.000868983,0.059761938,0.0004002437,0.000044121003,0.00018177617,0.000074402844,0.047876436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98547345,0.0023689317,0.0002785489,0.0009815212,0.007659646,0.0032379501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97538507,0.011929839,0.00091809034,0.0004896969,0.009755719,0.0015215417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010009875,0.00029289242,0.0006360236,0.002004287,0.02552519,0.013896562,0.0029375316,0.007936852,0.0035443185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032459956,0.00040879688,0.00046775563,0.0041335598,0.013505346,0.003461331,0.0023991615,0.0101140905,0.0004405989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062810584,0.000055484725,0.008249161,0.0003861383,0.00004917869,0.0032124522,0.05971625,0.00052210886,0.0011405087,0.6646077,0.17628048,0.085717805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003148476,0.00006592755,0.03492271,0.0015875711,0.00018137124,0.00055770244,0.05399026,0.0010336455,0.0019610317,0.036349796,0.86910594,0.00021258592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08502056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08502056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14716208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61687016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012031401","doi":"10.3917/apd.611.0074","title":"Développer la médiation, pourquoi et comment","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de philosophie du droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.02690727995388507,"score_gpt":0.3011377154763096,"score_spread":0.2742304355224245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012031401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028515387,0.020923782,0.045643736,0.35834533,0.003063644,0.00043165238,0.00048206918,0.0002379795,0.5423564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5032847,0.01692745,0.040594995,0.05362434,0.0008471657,0.000698532,0.0005896519,0.00023041533,0.38320282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871863,0.0061679925,0.00041982165,0.0013779652,0.0028691916,0.0019787133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98798287,0.0045644855,0.000652178,0.0020049969,0.004135074,0.0006605148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014201328,0.00071646896,0.0005747845,0.0017224598,0.0084958365,0.015019628,0.0030573981,0.009440779,0.024477566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025075201,0.00048077246,0.0011559431,0.0022999286,0.015116516,0.013358391,0.0054989094,0.008315145,0.004850931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014637531,0.000040481562,0.0008681339,0.00014513508,0.000017872335,0.00023447405,0.0059091565,0.00027660353,0.00034751507,0.9538011,0.018599914,0.019745061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028908704,0.000038369613,0.0018918308,0.0009273898,0.00003915404,0.0003201738,0.014643648,0.0010836826,0.0015806997,0.18246056,0.79692715,0.000058470134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24616197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32521445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24616197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017764576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04248662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48945826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015169960","doi":"","title":"Combatting Stereotyping & Facilitating Justice: McLachlin's Vision for the Law of Evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Law; Discretion; Oath; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Witness; Criminal justice; Admissible evidence; History","score_opus":0.08744174748217966,"score_gpt":0.4024636352868819,"score_spread":0.31502188780470225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015169960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005004668,0.03296341,0.07114492,0.7644101,0.0021852613,0.00013482198,0.00006495276,0.00017594015,0.12391592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64610827,0.030950036,0.10505117,0.17228489,0.00414556,0.0007771171,0.00009149157,0.0004133434,0.04017813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9425596,0.030401263,0.0019924007,0.005324826,0.015646378,0.0040755672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93198556,0.049245827,0.0026064583,0.0043428275,0.00879902,0.0030204002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0634942,0.0012278979,0.001634756,0.006039113,0.020151984,0.042067066,0.0066441456,0.024395917,0.0029883063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062031396,0.0015095709,0.0013935182,0.0033932035,0.183697,0.037981287,0.016764712,0.032550815,0.0007240584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054242296,0.0000049108303,0.00006768119,0.00003346212,0.0000034076004,0.000040651048,0.0032223787,0.00012594351,0.000036119673,0.9855995,0.005714142,0.005146342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016742852,0.0000098487,0.00008996737,0.000384938,0.0000086527825,0.000066050925,0.0021785202,0.00048043914,0.000116558294,0.91552526,0.08108636,0.00003681747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20496005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16219077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79503995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057970013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078153715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42060387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30152349","doi":"10.29173/alr165","title":"Distinguishing Charter Rights in Criminal and Regulatory Investigations: What’s the Purpose of Analyzing Purpose?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Charter; Law; Political science; Self-incrimination; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Criminal investigation; Interrogation; Business; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03058051503000783,"score_gpt":0.3200954985026871,"score_spread":0.2895149834726793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30152349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04795817,0.10601595,0.11974097,0.43585035,0.006986941,0.00033704814,0.0001387624,0.00014227569,0.2828295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8629337,0.03482054,0.030490672,0.052231815,0.00747633,0.00073855155,0.00010896877,0.00022161343,0.010977767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89000344,0.07377504,0.0045734737,0.0032603685,0.023115365,0.0052723056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6844984,0.27069908,0.013292716,0.011391004,0.018095218,0.0020236163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10524458,0.0008228967,0.0023667577,0.008638467,0.0063471985,0.02078218,0.0038390905,0.016131585,0.002220034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1846445,0.0010284147,0.002328315,0.004203625,0.075442486,0.040988617,0.009092746,0.011803038,0.0007809388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003244576,0.000024553248,0.0008852985,0.00030103058,0.000023207078,0.00009805895,0.0033125354,0.00015304801,0.000068066496,0.97423446,0.0023115852,0.0185558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048695198,0.000081584745,0.002028253,0.0027074711,0.00008750737,0.00032973514,0.005429621,0.00046601324,0.0005124103,0.92358464,0.06465249,0.00007161828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028148165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038363722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00614083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014317792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5565932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015707781","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Police Foundations: Canadian Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.08865983755033381,"score_gpt":0.37709803509270856,"score_spread":0.28843819754237476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015707781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017178871,0.024358159,0.0013319668,0.0610842,0.0034301153,0.00033632462,0.014976534,0.0010753482,0.8916895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008716786,0.012526199,0.00166059,0.003933423,0.00043026425,0.00009887021,0.0029459626,0.00039902743,0.96928877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602133,0.00027997606,0.00017636108,0.00020441627,0.0025984526,0.00071963517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98453933,0.0014020861,0.00026045443,0.00043982104,0.011471619,0.0018867436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036024456,0.001188306,0.00076065655,0.010273721,0.013706047,0.015687613,0.0027110607,0.0058845407,0.21819909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015158436,0.0010712612,0.0006275809,0.017038919,0.0043722433,0.0056145843,0.0033823184,0.0039464566,0.029082453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048753373,0.000011015174,0.00018850707,0.00010682958,0.0000014887952,0.000021131178,0.0003538071,0.00007378201,0.000019024146,0.028764768,0.94481295,0.025641834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028614006,0.000001804957,0.0010345213,0.00024656748,0.0000033168462,0.000010554505,0.00054865354,0.000060729915,0.00004162291,0.0027765299,0.9952591,0.000013670389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98257256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99304515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21819909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08868859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29678187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72994864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015945068","doi":"","title":"Mr.Big: The Undercover Breach of the Right against Self-Incrimination","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Law; Suspect; Political science; Privilege (computing); Supreme court; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.01838319241934098,"score_gpt":0.27261278206842965,"score_spread":0.25422958964908865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015945068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066617,0.0055852816,0.007062152,0.13690685,0.0023739247,0.00014089156,0.00025899618,0.00024971756,0.7808053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54089177,0.0025508623,0.0045021614,0.07955502,0.0013276299,0.00012430245,0.000065600114,0.00010800643,0.37087467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622834,0.0005255652,0.00015514017,0.0006188005,0.0016218805,0.0008503721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985145,0.00071984506,0.00015400078,0.00017533531,0.000299459,0.00013680884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031349894,0.00035415855,0.00041911477,0.00052996847,0.0058323443,0.0045009963,0.0012820221,0.008093416,0.005409485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004724002,0.0003862022,0.00045124782,0.0003053536,0.009578565,0.0028588576,0.0030908599,0.0064657773,0.0015500247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003088534,0.000021057958,0.0012479764,0.000048454436,0.000004901824,0.0008855101,0.005785482,0.00009428202,0.0015051202,0.9049479,0.063822374,0.021606207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022586062,0.00021117002,0.006290196,0.00039334348,0.00004825183,0.0027194228,0.0048808274,0.00083046337,0.0061080963,0.13925695,0.8391357,0.000103093065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039739408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07042979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039739408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031693848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005151819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07901621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023163165","doi":"10.61737/rslz5365","title":"Repenser la protection des renseignements personnels à la lumière des défis soulevés par l’IA","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.13727958921815997,"score_gpt":0.3520573723879974,"score_spread":0.21477778316983742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023163165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07395775,0.012897927,0.08527579,0.18219113,0.0034817348,0.0011694393,0.0005538023,0.0012279274,0.63924444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53800493,0.007736726,0.028476475,0.028797574,0.0007001164,0.00073060574,0.00050589704,0.00032688098,0.3947208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98416877,0.004725471,0.00050387677,0.0014885062,0.0058496254,0.0032637063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736429,0.0055381074,0.0015892158,0.0031567528,0.013346846,0.0027263265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014602909,0.0011964833,0.0008390237,0.0031737296,0.010806759,0.015276815,0.0045510945,0.007429821,0.026873482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029226769,0.0006275689,0.0010215387,0.00195827,0.009962934,0.0059766206,0.006637349,0.0069603273,0.0060574673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027198097,0.00022408877,0.019912118,0.0017290217,0.00011367628,0.0017217454,0.086139664,0.0044742785,0.006649727,0.3901907,0.16639826,0.32217476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043565986,0.00015602486,0.017156223,0.0026991018,0.000103504986,0.00043599049,0.035547964,0.0021968773,0.0026294033,0.024053551,0.9148443,0.00013347513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45360088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53881097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45360088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032268185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07285253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9019213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023244763","doi":"10.7202/1068780ar","title":"La conception jurisprudentielle de la notion de « confiance du public dans l’administration de la justice pénale »","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Administration of justice; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022480771004793534,"score_gpt":0.2989020281930855,"score_spread":0.27642125718829197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023244763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017161848,0.014808297,0.07216002,0.11326848,0.0012623994,0.00014341816,0.00026132478,0.00014798697,0.7807862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8038487,0.008533303,0.017364826,0.030568326,0.0015285157,0.00037235534,0.00015645014,0.00025297704,0.13737458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861669,0.0055541387,0.0003864749,0.0017532363,0.0043239216,0.0018154571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537766,0.002075668,0.00045725354,0.00050304946,0.0012480718,0.0003382481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006145112,0.0007493054,0.000629969,0.0025599285,0.009981331,0.018704789,0.0022774974,0.008853324,0.0050023436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062536662,0.000522419,0.001059902,0.0025479272,0.0594885,0.0072329626,0.004313633,0.0137711745,0.0010853688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016145686,0.0000026845642,0.00003946658,0.000011389736,0.0000014496467,0.000013553007,0.0015189046,0.000037589696,0.00003121173,0.9959858,0.0015393143,0.0008169559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001797254,0.000024626723,0.001029777,0.00026738088,0.000016755173,0.0001960318,0.0041042645,0.0006371299,0.0005189328,0.54805297,0.44509798,0.00003608313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18750048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15382168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18750048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033276428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03135407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37281823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023517729","doi":"10.7202/1068720ar","title":"Canadian Administrative Law: The Case for Judicial Humility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humility; Law; Skepticism; Supreme court; Political science; Dispute resolution; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.1736884450367656,"score_gpt":0.37155251308401666,"score_spread":0.19786406804725107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023517729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016263865,0.00908037,0.0020687461,0.5973912,0.0012126694,0.000062639905,0.00013276824,0.000071721115,0.373716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7780607,0.0069060395,0.003402799,0.15551387,0.0010944932,0.00010309131,0.0001159884,0.00012918886,0.0546738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95446306,0.009074011,0.00085800997,0.0036122932,0.021254454,0.010738081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93964505,0.02315914,0.0027781255,0.0029969336,0.02142946,0.009991351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024793502,0.00059218454,0.00082946557,0.005888316,0.04646967,0.023307376,0.0057027997,0.015797514,0.010095108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07562386,0.0008093783,0.00082625996,0.0059064417,0.054370638,0.0055135605,0.00993223,0.017376186,0.0010224846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016833323,0.000013125893,0.001596464,0.00005745744,0.000019486963,0.000316317,0.009560291,0.00014543548,0.00009723607,0.87438196,0.09533532,0.018460073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000733096,0.000018968614,0.010385417,0.0006773195,0.000057283476,0.0003338301,0.018559357,0.00085553015,0.00027081245,0.28330708,0.68527526,0.00018576739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9733849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98418474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.854928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.145072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26765785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023688852","doi":"10.7202/1068779ar","title":"Enjeux politiques et juridiques autour du principe de la confiance du public dans l’administration de la justice pénale","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05246962726247177,"score_gpt":0.3420629490544156,"score_spread":0.2895933217919438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023688852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14235486,0.008295341,0.035256412,0.05212101,0.0003068558,0.0001805859,0.00023474534,0.00014587575,0.7611044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537438,0.0027095946,0.0029608135,0.0018645944,0.00012979661,0.00016566413,0.000061683764,0.000053430314,0.03831055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98859274,0.0051828166,0.00030109065,0.0011055764,0.0029687178,0.0018490339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915446,0.004176838,0.0015499895,0.00088483165,0.001326129,0.00051771646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009813342,0.0005125844,0.0005363403,0.0027129115,0.008656544,0.016298678,0.001214922,0.0027483657,0.009132901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014203927,0.0005594264,0.00060508004,0.002746299,0.02439206,0.0054033934,0.0055197836,0.0063638627,0.00085864164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016288095,0.000017889382,0.0015258067,0.000054287957,0.000013589526,0.00003695175,0.0063521373,0.00057012105,0.00007844276,0.9831866,0.0011579316,0.0069899275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078364734,0.00012045326,0.026055705,0.000975483,0.00010123197,0.00021275593,0.027478034,0.0022825163,0.0011570182,0.68171865,0.25970298,0.000116885334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040804327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048228543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040804327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016657649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021413181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12086028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30242879","doi":"10.1002/jcb.27679","title":"Jurisdictions américaines et jurisdictions françaises face à l'article 33 de la Convention de Montréal: un dialogue de sourds?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.01439759107054561,"score_gpt":0.3170262186212822,"score_spread":0.3026286275507366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30242879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021560507,0.05899448,0.0028889766,0.6481647,0.034382623,0.00008356829,0.0008786288,0.00036685006,0.23267971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42240277,0.035127725,0.005291825,0.19503728,0.011117209,0.00014812281,0.0007121931,0.00071983156,0.32944307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993584,0.0016234434,0.0002067028,0.00077907374,0.0018398174,0.0019670185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903314,0.0022442667,0.0008572331,0.0006453172,0.0028821602,0.00303966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006848398,0.00048237658,0.00070041936,0.00091890246,0.0073820623,0.010389255,0.0017879393,0.004896961,0.045040805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013708761,0.00031599222,0.0005915203,0.0016125245,0.0061047357,0.003974472,0.0048707947,0.0049371375,0.0031454484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008338751,0.00005139943,0.01038759,0.00025466303,0.00007112589,0.0013075885,0.008262765,0.00024106572,0.0018277061,0.20216654,0.620231,0.15511516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068454233,0.000008422592,0.003761195,0.00017114799,0.00000905739,0.00019413407,0.0016705522,0.00004529818,0.00014569856,0.0023549611,0.9916044,0.00002846032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5039068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49155942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5039068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012267565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04506924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026709010","doi":"10.29173/wclawr12","title":"Unveiling Wrongful Convictions Between the U.S. and Italy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi Roma Tre","keywords":"Plea; Paragraph; Adversarial system; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.09630053066186586,"score_gpt":0.35066775521128807,"score_spread":0.2543672245494222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026709010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5547193,0.0715288,0.0016259301,0.122924395,0.002769123,0.00014307209,0.0009947352,0.00003719353,0.2452574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95699906,0.01390291,0.0003864415,0.020045813,0.00077589287,0.00005994317,0.00045775494,0.000023313027,0.0073488643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98775566,0.004711181,0.0009109628,0.0010214965,0.0030728963,0.0025277582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659864,0.01969994,0.006597513,0.0015625102,0.0047288276,0.0014248759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016965656,0.00023722825,0.0005172959,0.0061944104,0.003618373,0.0059467237,0.0012160427,0.0032237081,0.0022111821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04746479,0.0003821243,0.0005680169,0.006476234,0.005016276,0.00273008,0.0042712307,0.0041175834,0.00035034723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005624203,0.00019595567,0.28049484,0.0021744063,0.00040908324,0.005994938,0.06383329,0.0014679742,0.00087221613,0.29366165,0.15545563,0.19487758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057049863,0.0002945338,0.59472936,0.0046439767,0.00036722748,0.0014356435,0.03108947,0.00071231485,0.001290858,0.015497094,0.34973153,0.00015094358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09452968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19373596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09452968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066311797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009722281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18795896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026761338","doi":"","title":"La transmission du SIDA en droit pénal suisse, avec des aspects de droit français et canadien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Jusletter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01560113730280138,"score_gpt":0.2762462616195872,"score_spread":0.2606451243167858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026761338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773959,0.0035474394,0.00046371247,0.0032528555,0.00010218305,0.0000388948,0.00043767132,0.0000095294,0.014751832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917679,0.0027457864,0.00022848352,0.00018985028,0.000061921106,0.00001669581,0.00016533914,0.0000047699323,0.00481915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538344,0.0021502348,0.00025704282,0.00038303633,0.0007857016,0.0010404596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530846,0.0016608528,0.0010947154,0.0002694302,0.0011942327,0.0004723338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003804675,0.0007270499,0.00050814706,0.0019678262,0.0038689752,0.00361273,0.0006572564,0.002508134,0.0045705526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011145065,0.00038148588,0.0010524482,0.00326005,0.0030474742,0.001180931,0.0013719146,0.0032513815,0.000343157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014301541,0.00082193443,0.80693257,0.00042445102,0.0010079164,0.01850227,0.052114483,0.002909805,0.0033203496,0.031053906,0.0031038849,0.07837822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034625642,0.00030002045,0.96301776,0.00026482315,0.00019682443,0.0037335262,0.017633239,0.00082872703,0.0005611339,0.00083793263,0.012528427,0.00006291175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72964317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5684688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27035683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011194381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008303538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.543898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027067719","doi":"10.29173/wclawr6","title":"Edwin Borchard’s Innocence Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Scholarship; Denial; Law; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.13099619454145284,"score_gpt":0.38687729845660057,"score_spread":0.25588110391514773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027067719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019284264,0.32215616,0.0044005453,0.52674747,0.02040203,0.00011543742,0.00027151618,0.00014495994,0.123833485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10526098,0.3475566,0.009952953,0.2101865,0.01812125,0.00072800624,0.00054756046,0.00046746925,0.30717868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859213,0.006103513,0.00043053736,0.001249037,0.005210248,0.0010853023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658409,0.020745976,0.0014069547,0.001418026,0.0062427195,0.0043454664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017489733,0.00038213684,0.00068030274,0.0042147012,0.0039344784,0.008274071,0.001272587,0.0039644744,0.008172303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042273875,0.00045101647,0.00029452128,0.0026834537,0.0051185274,0.004809205,0.0040905653,0.0061209532,0.0038516645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003357652,0.00003557152,0.0003663293,0.00037062805,0.000011984917,0.00010955629,0.0010580713,0.00006819068,0.00009595101,0.17400478,0.74024534,0.08360008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003924683,0.000005780414,0.00016662954,0.0002803724,0.0000018103738,0.000037933347,0.00017239866,0.00001615909,0.00006429007,0.0070677954,0.99217826,0.0000045819215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009881544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013094784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017489733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042520203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018212533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09249562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027333067","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3486","title":"Re-Charting the Remedial Course for Section 11(b) Violations Post-Jordan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Section (typography); Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07075285999779458,"score_gpt":0.34410968145068865,"score_spread":0.2733568214528941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027333067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10176588,0.003981038,0.157714,0.11535374,0.0023821986,0.0006982443,0.00027289634,0.0012533745,0.6165786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8263509,0.0012860579,0.048098333,0.0441193,0.0008896045,0.0002971069,0.00013001774,0.0002557125,0.0785729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634198,0.007178013,0.0019344011,0.004971147,0.017309548,0.0051870807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98095155,0.006759156,0.0015441821,0.0027191085,0.007124398,0.0009016661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028086383,0.0005189785,0.0006601001,0.002119726,0.009263789,0.012147896,0.0048512416,0.012295799,0.004195128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038013306,0.000853479,0.001506381,0.0010663653,0.02109221,0.008398014,0.00603569,0.02158499,0.0010445855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086334485,0.000023598406,0.0003847165,0.000023195973,0.0000064053556,0.000059388825,0.0016443823,0.00049852714,0.00028200785,0.9831134,0.005681348,0.008274318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014392582,0.00027172288,0.0051231715,0.0007206277,0.00012035986,0.0004240398,0.005423198,0.0061230813,0.0064074066,0.53122264,0.4435592,0.0004606483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12196707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17619623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12196707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016792307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0652605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24251431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028255754","doi":"10.29173/wclawr8","title":"Miscarriages of Justice in Canada: Causes, Responses, Remedies (Kathryn M. Campbell)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Economic Justice; Happening; Subtitle; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Performance art","score_opus":0.07744738437431024,"score_gpt":0.3296450780506297,"score_spread":0.25219769367631945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028255754","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001991873,0.80522716,0.00027267847,0.14125007,0.011722315,0.00008175199,0.00055448443,0.00002940143,0.038870174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02832949,0.8807509,0.00039750658,0.033628475,0.0032929932,0.00008684316,0.0003785974,0.00004195242,0.05309323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956781,0.0006263737,0.00017501476,0.0002555695,0.0027558866,0.0005090139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355537,0.0013602772,0.00044455772,0.00007356106,0.0038583975,0.00070785946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031229493,0.00051254436,0.0006759327,0.003601819,0.0070837797,0.0047058347,0.0013764795,0.0027996807,0.0069442457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013836231,0.0006591351,0.00053121644,0.0063876943,0.002649452,0.0019037918,0.0016924582,0.004905678,0.0009042141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000875374,0.000014890698,0.0013961976,0.00087452633,0.000021649977,0.0001696783,0.0020943196,0.00011598375,0.00003087382,0.00913786,0.9007759,0.08535935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089068435,0.000020821077,0.020000009,0.0060352962,0.000059655067,0.00028674354,0.0062011466,0.00010857681,0.00007126857,0.0032248269,0.9639293,0.000053422104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9492388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050761223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03498058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12389841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25380307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303022657","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics after Auschwitz: The Case against SNCF","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Honor; Nazism; Refugee; Morality; Resistance (ecology); Spanish Civil War; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.288916643576832,"score_gpt":0.4427933279766645,"score_spread":0.1538766843998325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303022657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105858736,0.008488082,0.0022882768,0.6237469,0.0034384108,0.00004642158,0.000032388514,0.00005292423,0.25604787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7118216,0.0017106874,0.0008145359,0.22506076,0.0010416827,0.00007560676,0.000018401674,0.000053053984,0.05940359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936415,0.004173551,0.0002656036,0.0010453657,0.0020931268,0.0030581593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320096,0.0043552723,0.00033480796,0.00030148673,0.0010590646,0.00074841105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008171372,0.00050205644,0.00053858355,0.0011130489,0.026985014,0.007325406,0.001832744,0.026723202,0.0031846382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02140281,0.0003775744,0.00058470643,0.001110871,0.031580355,0.004451299,0.006491181,0.019453183,0.0004203654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014617304,0.00002883652,0.0013750767,0.000029302533,0.000009958871,0.0032577706,0.028672531,0.00024299175,0.00015161422,0.8837224,0.07466063,0.00783419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027510248,0.00005468546,0.0028569545,0.0007979185,0.000030547813,0.0020119061,0.041712657,0.0011014121,0.0005132046,0.22918029,0.7215902,0.0001226682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16314588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16092515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16314588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014673235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015830511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32439256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033699722","doi":"","title":"De positie van het slachtoffer bij de voorwaardelijke invrijheidstelling en de voorwaardelijke beëindiging van de dwangverpleging in rechtsvergelijkend perspectief","year":2020,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Research portal (Tilburg University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09042382122545853,"score_gpt":0.36270239221584394,"score_spread":0.27227857099038544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033699722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13153051,0.0074425098,0.022393722,0.11487146,0.00074579276,0.00011765713,0.0004778999,0.00007179881,0.7223487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924568,0.003917074,0.0033092669,0.0053969184,0.00017138176,0.000101562306,0.00018392313,0.00008065639,0.062271234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919165,0.0036242793,0.00026968066,0.0010478029,0.0020101483,0.0011315047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912676,0.004843819,0.0010841065,0.000851412,0.0012239848,0.00072907854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006186642,0.0003827116,0.00039038665,0.0014772282,0.004572592,0.009913268,0.001007128,0.0027145038,0.025401378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01319971,0.0004211684,0.00056498,0.0011584024,0.02199101,0.008792397,0.0049096807,0.0040946933,0.001901433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002704586,0.000041659063,0.0036767013,0.0001606686,0.000018878967,0.0001540049,0.015321991,0.000175275,0.00052011496,0.9579069,0.006967046,0.015029659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003941047,0.00006886463,0.017807148,0.0011528655,0.000073769945,0.0003155559,0.04631572,0.00046895028,0.0017627465,0.6085874,0.32334223,0.000065327695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03323651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049942084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03323651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007003849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012359204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08497608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035842853","doi":"10.7202/1067975ar","title":"ACTE FONDATEUR OU LOI ORDINAIRE ? LE STATUT DE LA CHARTE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS DE LA PERSONNE DANS L’ORDRE JURIDIQUE QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Bombardier (Canada); Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024783736133724813,"score_gpt":0.30210376539980666,"score_spread":0.27732002926608185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035842853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14280508,0.0063807457,0.0035438992,0.073946394,0.0008408295,0.00005363471,0.0004347833,0.000084593485,0.77190995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85949206,0.0013514105,0.0007928404,0.00256455,0.00007914854,0.000037861613,0.00009280941,0.000049404218,0.13554002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984894,0.000365475,0.000025787229,0.00020655799,0.0003300013,0.0005827456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875295,0.00023153146,0.00009435139,0.00007638447,0.0004873833,0.00035743625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015026676,0.0002693795,0.0002949338,0.0010976149,0.011881079,0.007691774,0.0010419248,0.0014481284,0.010505986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025642226,0.00018717031,0.00015342627,0.0013253486,0.014520649,0.0026455177,0.0015177629,0.0031259272,0.0006305487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028228822,0.000008330731,0.003496387,0.000041834315,0.0000064134942,0.000104468825,0.039548893,0.00014703229,0.00019972165,0.91383463,0.026231214,0.01635289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019553925,0.000022095082,0.03357799,0.0005024074,0.000023062996,0.00008243674,0.066862375,0.00054539845,0.00047357162,0.03278489,0.8650222,0.00008400023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97545946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05155641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050075006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057880525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3633213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036796238","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850410.003.0002","title":"Defining the Scope of the Hearsay Rule in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Legislation; Admissible evidence; Criminal procedure; Perspective (graphical); Criminal law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1081255818963649,"score_gpt":0.3727505329961835,"score_spread":0.2646249510998186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036796238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018250648,0.045286503,0.021545118,0.036789466,0.0006908658,0.00011571033,0.0001073697,0.00002438385,0.8771899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89675915,0.040970843,0.016848767,0.012664082,0.0014961435,0.00028942875,0.000135524,0.00007508854,0.030761076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768097,0.01216381,0.0010001775,0.0010879104,0.006392525,0.0025460224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96988815,0.020692961,0.0009737031,0.0009803798,0.0064747375,0.0009900389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019788755,0.0005076046,0.0016060149,0.009269301,0.009917322,0.02038991,0.0031200366,0.00924423,0.0070089204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029370459,0.0008687244,0.0011426144,0.0056220326,0.043152105,0.015158202,0.00765509,0.00973172,0.00055020215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004373914,0.00000529978,0.00009893793,0.000049563154,0.0000027300528,0.000057963432,0.0018201298,0.00011139359,0.000045884564,0.99533135,0.0006736556,0.0017985499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023090208,0.00007800232,0.0036444082,0.003293218,0.00006126333,0.0003614573,0.018470485,0.00089628744,0.00042656332,0.76510054,0.20753497,0.000109820096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10909402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14579456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10909402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030934658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019956063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22444773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038450938","doi":"10.71781/2288","title":"L'impact des recommandations des commissions d'enquête sur la législation québécoise","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.10481419918785237,"score_gpt":0.41807622452364046,"score_spread":0.31326202533578806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038450938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22113444,0.028437704,0.004583545,0.16132931,0.00432885,0.0005272236,0.0032731984,0.0002799121,0.57610583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6587327,0.01189065,0.004173131,0.026723374,0.00043488876,0.0003337981,0.0012873145,0.00013518262,0.29628897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97699475,0.0055747856,0.0006618334,0.0015405063,0.0102951545,0.004932829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96985,0.00646275,0.0018815963,0.0010020346,0.018033521,0.0027700278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010898986,0.000689908,0.0006364456,0.002907212,0.013716184,0.01081679,0.0019251737,0.0044175163,0.014240989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029265432,0.0006782525,0.00085802865,0.0036931003,0.005058323,0.0018535622,0.0025351718,0.00492822,0.0010690006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019968236,0.00021335516,0.047486562,0.0012046568,0.00028936547,0.0018181633,0.041931152,0.0030360257,0.0027825725,0.4791139,0.30652177,0.11540284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043851,0.00007384674,0.07454583,0.0009672738,0.000106367814,0.0001228527,0.010224032,0.00053323724,0.0008752545,0.002460826,0.9099043,0.00014234144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102785714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18542863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74576604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038687493","doi":"10.32850/2414-4207.2019.11-2.19","title":"CRIMINAL PROTECTION OF LAW SUPPORTING PERSONS UNDER LIGISLATION OF ENGLAND AND CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.026127836886975227,"score_gpt":0.27721452076706826,"score_spread":0.25108668388009303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038687493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79509044,0.0039477544,0.0005168634,0.037961368,0.00048098972,0.0005510645,0.005584074,0.000067509325,0.15579988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89677745,0.0014763694,0.00066453987,0.012900207,0.0000886076,0.00016212327,0.0008741012,0.00002989521,0.087026626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98775256,0.0007099565,0.0006758603,0.0007319141,0.003284534,0.00684526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743692,0.0036586542,0.0018938023,0.0007303866,0.0108714895,0.008476343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045522745,0.0002971641,0.000821423,0.0029289967,0.011545735,0.0057678623,0.0031021775,0.0046261926,0.006689007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025741324,0.00079832895,0.0006479841,0.0025909327,0.0021979348,0.001438982,0.004418538,0.0048724227,0.00043197893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011165141,0.0003576672,0.56927866,0.00082902284,0.00037378853,0.0040663346,0.04405189,0.0015829348,0.0021195617,0.13378447,0.14493875,0.09750035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001425876,0.00017479196,0.81412905,0.0008472882,0.0003505633,0.000624741,0.025833057,0.0010298712,0.0012719072,0.002813656,0.15256949,0.00021300752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070823796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070823796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2309597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.513865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039321764","doi":"10.7202/1070088ar","title":"Repenser le secret ministériel","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.044936643948144415,"score_gpt":0.27912217373445036,"score_spread":0.23418552978630594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039321764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09228095,0.011604846,0.013871169,0.19879694,0.004405297,0.0007952659,0.0010130347,0.0005100645,0.6767224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47224066,0.0048755114,0.0059544453,0.05185197,0.0005585415,0.00020940276,0.00053897756,0.00023622927,0.46353427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98084086,0.0021938488,0.0004252041,0.001581254,0.009742566,0.0052162753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871798,0.0019774921,0.00075718964,0.00082835695,0.006788592,0.0024686365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180084,0.0006664082,0.0005497681,0.0016097242,0.009655355,0.008338278,0.002401386,0.0044517913,0.017770866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02151702,0.0005960765,0.0006381706,0.0016907622,0.005949896,0.0028102815,0.0045848517,0.0075203837,0.0025972272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016614569,0.00008491963,0.010172656,0.0005041771,0.00008055232,0.00070610567,0.014425812,0.0010664959,0.0028599694,0.70905536,0.17025152,0.090626225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002628097,0.000035836896,0.0052083563,0.0003587241,0.000029583847,0.0001076742,0.0036373246,0.00041200663,0.0010403492,0.0071819266,0.98191017,0.00005175516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85071766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8840613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85071766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056750435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16550073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41175514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039854006","doi":"10.7202/1070096ar","title":"Euthanasie, abattage et mise à mort d’animaux : comment interpréter la Loi sur le bien-être et la sécurité de l’animal? Commentaire sur Road to Home Rescue Support c Ville de Montréal","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033291207201605326,"score_gpt":0.3049380673679497,"score_spread":0.2716468601663444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039854006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020824475,0.009902509,0.0009056321,0.88440204,0.0017089777,0.000068361354,0.0002492122,0.000026247493,0.08191258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4326199,0.015084447,0.0013175311,0.4436617,0.002638842,0.00012281696,0.00011567464,0.00006840051,0.10437071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906241,0.0026506442,0.0004297964,0.001067713,0.0023746016,0.0028531137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98054713,0.011992941,0.001509289,0.00047701644,0.0040063453,0.001467341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010667397,0.0004527157,0.0004985717,0.0010145903,0.01771765,0.01038186,0.0039654216,0.018210176,0.007896832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030012267,0.00062185904,0.00085784553,0.0016415431,0.021695223,0.004376081,0.0043522557,0.0160742,0.0006593085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007840806,0.00005956273,0.0126113165,0.0005166953,0.0000765661,0.0026261723,0.074129984,0.00044142807,0.0008673235,0.5003685,0.3766203,0.031603865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074597425,0.00007631549,0.025081756,0.00163905,0.00011592605,0.0005109213,0.05219036,0.00044652596,0.000920541,0.031219063,0.8874935,0.00023149051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.962276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078749835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078749835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10254039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57137275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040201991","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.604","title":"International and Comparative Legal Perspectives on Victim Participation in Criminal Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Legal process; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.22032928683974545,"score_gpt":0.45648960803239785,"score_spread":0.2361603211926524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040201991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045680985,0.03181258,0.0012622612,0.03238655,0.0004902958,0.000019609568,0.00006322613,0.000012168776,0.8882723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589535,0.019965606,0.0006254944,0.0020804529,0.00055360957,0.00006830401,0.000071124516,0.000024068007,0.017657744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912918,0.006147895,0.00018564609,0.0004337597,0.0007898711,0.0011509546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992753,0.004814513,0.0007087023,0.0003937637,0.00067120383,0.00065875694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059349956,0.00039653564,0.00042259527,0.008020517,0.0070324363,0.012772751,0.0015676633,0.003866442,0.015168448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073531596,0.00015180763,0.0002916452,0.008824562,0.033564802,0.009402653,0.0065352144,0.0033702177,0.000527107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000697945,0.000021845244,0.0005020833,0.00006818666,0.0000029564576,0.00013674193,0.023453567,0.000046285164,0.000027542543,0.96728957,0.00246091,0.005983403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129760765,0.000050426646,0.008603106,0.0025861124,0.000021640319,0.00071187713,0.23501198,0.0003541219,0.00022598924,0.30580717,0.44658718,0.0000274195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011939883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013648457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015168448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009863646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032260627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071566105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040561312","doi":"10.7202/1070090ar","title":"Étude comparative des programmes canadiens de mesures de rechange ou comment favoriser le désengorgement des tribunaux","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec); Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11986454629354087,"score_gpt":0.35149742704073544,"score_spread":0.23163288074719457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040561312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58492917,0.014429489,0.0027669608,0.012555092,0.00035473157,0.00060327264,0.0021034626,0.00012500724,0.38213286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379437,0.002732113,0.00097255205,0.0013508248,0.00003806793,0.0002492213,0.0005243971,0.000022649103,0.05616659],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468476,0.0015357619,0.00009771905,0.00040885338,0.0015547944,0.001718238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925568,0.0019143118,0.0007849774,0.00037903825,0.0025228956,0.0018419714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033960296,0.00029920443,0.00036255067,0.0025494376,0.0038863905,0.002714109,0.0010885602,0.00089922576,0.018155176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013996359,0.00022752488,0.00032021734,0.0042299624,0.0021262274,0.0011798819,0.0016042887,0.0015391118,0.000829777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008591313,0.0010066649,0.19714652,0.0027398781,0.0003990415,0.0005380543,0.03936021,0.004739594,0.003093961,0.19967872,0.042616088,0.5078221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013943405,0.000505784,0.72821134,0.0012489296,0.00024314367,0.0001773646,0.019235456,0.0011188481,0.0013037581,0.0031322483,0.24460387,0.000079749705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8678634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9499959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13213658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044865698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06888433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32552493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040873337","doi":"10.2307/jj.17610838.13","title":"A Human Rights-Based Approach to Data Protection in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Data Protection Act 1998; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Human rights; Analytics; The Internet; Digital rights; Internet of Things; Data analysis; Computer security; Political science; World Wide Web; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.069253950882884,"score_gpt":0.24140351139025612,"score_spread":0.17214956050737212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040873337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043262723,0.015356329,0.0031171644,0.042631634,0.0011323544,0.000103332226,0.00030944534,0.00005155023,0.9329719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2116214,0.02879638,0.005084182,0.029857041,0.0004117331,0.00014865768,0.00034963503,0.00013158513,0.7235994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472433,0.00061630993,0.000120585435,0.00042240592,0.002797866,0.0013184465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975382,0.00072960113,0.00006537112,0.00016728479,0.0011557708,0.0003438019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039375,0.0005266603,0.00047595796,0.0023996274,0.016867688,0.01296717,0.0021799225,0.0061171055,0.009794521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052685784,0.0005589171,0.00046569805,0.004897356,0.021272922,0.0040334067,0.0038798447,0.007959426,0.0012486725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054134,0.000008649152,0.0001417997,0.00004134682,0.000003234647,0.00012102,0.0026931022,0.00023898859,0.00005176146,0.9340775,0.052428134,0.010188933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006013731,0.000005306542,0.00061834627,0.00031566859,0.000008480072,0.000117989584,0.0019876366,0.00036388193,0.00014807848,0.09085434,0.90554506,0.000029159692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97633356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12641911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12641911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22908297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9172391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041054523","doi":"","title":"Committing to Justice: The Case for Impact of Race and Culture Assessments in Sentencing African Canadian Offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Legal culture; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05734236290949063,"score_gpt":0.3685529271919873,"score_spread":0.31121056428249666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041054523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43208572,0.0067203054,0.0035755457,0.31785443,0.0013497734,0.00043075508,0.00021890363,0.00010122421,0.23766343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97275645,0.0018191488,0.0017043503,0.0142496,0.00017503535,0.00007494073,0.000028717184,0.000031033334,0.009160878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96451604,0.00852872,0.00087958004,0.0015709351,0.013638445,0.010866296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590111,0.014125851,0.0020885994,0.0013213082,0.016204538,0.0072487486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024128402,0.0006246953,0.0005266668,0.0031515772,0.04295771,0.011890778,0.005096974,0.006174578,0.002522721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078656614,0.0007157264,0.00082361366,0.0024748351,0.01759213,0.004156149,0.0064590694,0.013234823,0.00021569713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034501098,0.00026218293,0.0931438,0.00054262346,0.00016188924,0.010189885,0.2969304,0.0020324632,0.0023166686,0.3025237,0.088123605,0.20342787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011551201,0.00030064533,0.24243373,0.0039532166,0.0010478838,0.003940009,0.39630693,0.004896752,0.0046712817,0.046685442,0.2947184,0.00093016116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97918636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11316468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11316468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21907225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.821071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041316142","doi":"10.17613/2pk1-2b62","title":"A Recipe For Wrongful Confessions: A Case Study Examining The Reid Technique And The Interrogation Of Indigenous Suspects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Michigan State University College of Law (Michigan State University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Confession (law); Innocence; Indigenous; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Right to counsel; Criminal investigation; Law enforcement; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; History; Supreme court","score_opus":0.046781492985756186,"score_gpt":0.2658260750660992,"score_spread":0.219044582080343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041316142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8025254,0.0036965217,0.03144971,0.057150252,0.00069744023,0.00065148936,0.0001102922,0.00028626874,0.10343266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555008,0.0018252786,0.02143278,0.0038500235,0.00015421916,0.000238732,0.000027152515,0.00013427166,0.016836636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.986244,0.010587014,0.00040900233,0.00058125076,0.0013605045,0.00081811904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790437,0.015292219,0.0020230275,0.0020509728,0.0011621314,0.00042788687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016483381,0.000720667,0.00038714032,0.0027975105,0.019298084,0.0043924865,0.0029320728,0.008777802,0.0044696275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06563621,0.00078409904,0.0007240198,0.0014792363,0.012918545,0.007453493,0.005522402,0.007104362,0.001084155],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079775906,0.0002450685,0.011811098,0.000415328,0.00003326135,0.044288322,0.78036344,0.00020986785,0.0029034342,0.08791551,0.011586611,0.06014834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019569161,0.000191936,0.006567447,0.0012113022,0.00009602965,0.064842805,0.7856602,0.0010054857,0.005276612,0.02153015,0.11346728,0.00013122469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005158889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02161607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019298084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017332234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045570326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08717352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042812747","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Public Interest Disclosure Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.183449894794901,"score_gpt":0.3361380578789892,"score_spread":0.1526881630840882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042812747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02583184,0.00835084,0.0020681727,0.094457954,0.007020057,0.003399703,0.015384188,0.00038264756,0.84310466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07191254,0.0046413266,0.0055628424,0.107478224,0.0008034455,0.002973734,0.0036323254,0.00021202287,0.80278355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97033095,0.003966288,0.0039023655,0.0028668127,0.012200041,0.006733565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96304893,0.018119976,0.00214585,0.0035686982,0.011019029,0.0020975564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016583726,0.0016523855,0.0018411146,0.006489951,0.017014872,0.018013591,0.008654203,0.02674055,0.021771826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05159353,0.0039125723,0.0020823614,0.0065949024,0.0059076264,0.0047077644,0.005779175,0.021900145,0.006365434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002519903,0.00027081036,0.007618322,0.00039408013,0.00013203178,0.0019819532,0.0042347144,0.0006491374,0.0015277377,0.3935503,0.57071745,0.01867152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028172214,0.0000808037,0.03817835,0.0013080748,0.0002269494,0.00048129575,0.0027987976,0.00049239135,0.0023418383,0.013112347,0.94022506,0.00047237525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8683088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96138245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13169122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06798851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15489544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49329346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043009569","doi":"10.7202/1070287ar","title":"Who’s Afraid of the Lucky MOOSE? Canada’s Dangerous Self-Defence Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self defense; Law; Honour; Property (philosophy); Accident (philosophy); Homicide; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Philosophy; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.04184741893304051,"score_gpt":0.269954528803408,"score_spread":0.22810710987036747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043009569","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06651567,0.010820197,0.0020735164,0.5776172,0.0011260968,0.00003509066,0.000252807,0.000069058115,0.34149036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8553791,0.007461132,0.0013802175,0.066435635,0.00021359332,0.000024347813,0.00010207207,0.00007337952,0.068930395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993519,0.0010009755,0.00009450614,0.00063069595,0.00284228,0.0019125408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887106,0.0029465521,0.00040646034,0.0005213542,0.0051401425,0.00227488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055377902,0.00026183733,0.00036995782,0.0011119578,0.022647401,0.0105689075,0.0017656839,0.0044521634,0.0072549297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017045604,0.00025300725,0.00034416758,0.0014957936,0.022331411,0.0039118365,0.0035761679,0.008156561,0.0004953789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004252993,0.000020709116,0.007310439,0.00011711039,0.000027394593,0.00062310405,0.026762357,0.00026381973,0.00031390766,0.7470268,0.16673943,0.05075238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014518621,0.000026517004,0.01082192,0.000548879,0.00004516876,0.00031915668,0.029220076,0.00042867454,0.000525769,0.054395553,0.90352225,0.00013149517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98462844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99166507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08719477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08719477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14860652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6326453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043652341","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - School Districts and Subdistricts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.06862353800425482,"score_gpt":0.30035542486366684,"score_spread":0.23173188685941204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043652341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82212615,0.004997391,0.00059313717,0.0070144613,0.00021891434,0.00064664474,0.021905005,0.000038879396,0.1424594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005452,0.0028976132,0.001080333,0.0014390661,0.000034171604,0.00037816804,0.0058551547,0.000039215884,0.087731175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556434,0.0010460118,0.0004940713,0.00047032122,0.0009947409,0.0014304842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98866326,0.0033413284,0.0027148658,0.0008194886,0.002779312,0.00168173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026030603,0.0003997072,0.00069274503,0.006072345,0.004904398,0.004048725,0.0024721127,0.0008595384,0.013819817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136973215,0.00095967605,0.00054427574,0.011864587,0.0022275194,0.0017078958,0.0024740337,0.0018562089,0.000968231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044147155,0.00018203695,0.85865027,0.00041762824,0.00026325506,0.0011088426,0.013190539,0.0021945466,0.00051538076,0.04536744,0.03939161,0.03827706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028572962,0.00003769294,0.9601788,0.00020855392,0.00009383673,0.00008349969,0.017023599,0.00023094217,0.00041757608,0.0011345472,0.02052016,0.000042156516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9656033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99470264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046120398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046120398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0560327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33462846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046552460","doi":"10.29173/alr2603","title":"The Jury is Out: The Controversy About Jury Trials Under the Alberta Securities Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Jury trial; Political science; Section (typography); Enforcement; Prison; Business","score_opus":0.10636989358145811,"score_gpt":0.38661057344511784,"score_spread":0.28024067986365975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046552460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07298922,0.11346578,0.0016488587,0.48354676,0.003711567,0.000107236956,0.00032570338,0.000074371885,0.3241305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.782492,0.048911422,0.0016692458,0.12180352,0.002239461,0.00008609035,0.00014132335,0.000058059588,0.042598885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976141,0.006494409,0.0010066319,0.001481788,0.011429386,0.0034467462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95560324,0.030629182,0.001926477,0.0006755222,0.008341383,0.0028243603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026954731,0.00030059228,0.00077721564,0.0039712302,0.014469208,0.0123415105,0.0047630253,0.010902205,0.0038154472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07180443,0.0006522574,0.00044871448,0.0049427156,0.024363304,0.0032441127,0.002474422,0.011502113,0.00044974653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017141255,0.000056820205,0.007914197,0.000503396,0.00006623016,0.00083873206,0.011894504,0.0008718748,0.00038859158,0.74697596,0.13630348,0.094014786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024871237,0.00021289349,0.105288476,0.0042027337,0.0003425305,0.0006311695,0.03335179,0.0012985758,0.0011290422,0.17509457,0.6777667,0.00043274442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9228234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.976656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08167416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08167416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14934638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5925903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046767836","doi":"10.7202/1070653ar","title":"Culture juridique des droits de la personne et justiciabilité des droits économiques, sociaux et culturels : tendances à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.017434882614736545,"score_gpt":0.27954023040706966,"score_spread":0.26210534779233313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046767836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71350455,0.0044328887,0.001748848,0.026549079,0.00020568699,0.00004489248,0.00022984808,0.000030224242,0.2532541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780647,0.0012002421,0.0002426289,0.0006060649,0.00001230573,0.0000120742425,0.000032140368,0.000012729806,0.019816998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976311,0.0005012006,0.000037114285,0.00020859703,0.00086156145,0.00076052226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971819,0.00061777455,0.00017507261,0.00011152834,0.0011329422,0.0007806964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016842779,0.00027217227,0.0004030337,0.0014016819,0.026148152,0.011651006,0.0009913717,0.001089579,0.005095702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035231875,0.00023524076,0.00021893358,0.0025727982,0.01872309,0.0018210877,0.0032031408,0.0032156906,0.00016105273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066675566,0.00003522527,0.02006466,0.000097596996,0.00003321264,0.00048301418,0.39371675,0.0007054696,0.0011721221,0.5388483,0.013105784,0.031671286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017583543,0.000029913721,0.08779609,0.00044467,0.000059832033,0.00022828707,0.54071283,0.0010392665,0.0010577292,0.025463197,0.34300795,0.00014264318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99116594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87371683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1262832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14076465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91625303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3065343496","doi":"","title":"The Price of Prevention: Anti-Terrorism Pre-Crime Measures and International Human Rights Law,","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Scrutiny; Human rights; Law; Democracy; International human rights law; International law; Normative; Law enforcement; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04751888616490402,"score_gpt":0.33249226279529404,"score_spread":0.28497337663039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3065343496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016300427,0.084319845,0.0057891253,0.41373706,0.0025348829,0.000035676207,0.00005889668,0.000027436665,0.47719657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8389923,0.043521475,0.0036253307,0.07091034,0.004110276,0.000118558,0.00006302973,0.000062864165,0.038595807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961473,0.0018743853,0.00009999944,0.00040990207,0.0008627736,0.00060575636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942572,0.004102267,0.00072395534,0.00023622984,0.0003721102,0.00030814495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046585137,0.00046655312,0.00042054415,0.0014900302,0.0044271355,0.014190379,0.0012620804,0.008428829,0.0075255246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007923018,0.0002774529,0.00035356902,0.0017084203,0.033782586,0.016585896,0.0040455195,0.011399747,0.0005816344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030240876,0.000006824278,0.00013798344,0.000023259316,0.0000012068252,0.000021290805,0.0007485938,0.000050645554,0.000018369863,0.9937723,0.0022721675,0.0029442855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011191295,0.000043407148,0.0026649786,0.001078265,0.000012787492,0.00019336963,0.008264455,0.0005974827,0.00030208935,0.7775653,0.209233,0.00003371891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010273125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013494131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014190379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007107016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005389698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05156529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080249192","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Nunavut Law Program Research Guide: Sentencing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.44149698063445914,"score_gpt":0.5906893278705666,"score_spread":0.14919234723610747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080249192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002577231,0.002950755,0.008897448,0.010455026,0.0019999652,0.009063051,0.07426543,0.0041579464,0.88563323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010209605,0.005285469,0.025920805,0.0037071723,0.0005319953,0.017366108,0.03018137,0.0022332147,0.9045642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942221,0.001885163,0.00064014713,0.00036647447,0.0025021676,0.00038386916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938623,0.017212199,0.0013200492,0.0022574284,0.03765965,0.002927649],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01141158,0.00090555137,0.00091789925,0.008508797,0.0055133956,0.0056164274,0.0026270172,0.0021212194,0.36274105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06425095,0.0013786375,0.0004889761,0.0076711974,0.0013825268,0.00546108,0.0030209895,0.003188384,0.16883805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018750958,0.000070326045,0.00029624274,0.00030432976,0.0000011304941,0.000011307513,0.00037775323,0.00005151915,0.00004064814,0.004454369,0.9307276,0.06364588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035633733,0.000039704188,0.0036844674,0.0016649178,0.000006989516,0.000037797185,0.0017187028,0.00016317915,0.00025529563,0.0053102924,0.9870576,0.000025347168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09454587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33504015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90545416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007003546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04514269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90897256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085040321","doi":"10.11575/prism/34351","title":"Book Review – \"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy by David R. Boyd\"","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0353143775393057,"score_gpt":0.33989532997178934,"score_spread":0.3045809524324836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085040321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031961745,0.39588955,0.00096599397,0.38047805,0.055410266,0.0000721199,0.0005994054,0.0001133501,0.16615163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014554669,0.426201,0.0017887312,0.14799225,0.03918502,0.00011585451,0.00088723755,0.00025712323,0.36901817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975479,0.00026864884,0.000058971058,0.0001793527,0.001803237,0.000141851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914858,0.0025438226,0.00021820642,0.00015321627,0.005149134,0.0004499396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021798727,0.00072889286,0.0006426579,0.004260563,0.004629955,0.0043073827,0.0023696858,0.0034811986,0.024429258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00911766,0.00036021776,0.0003109198,0.005736469,0.005364212,0.0029934752,0.0010496491,0.0043246164,0.0060084835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012549087,9.929257e-7,0.000028682296,0.000057048517,0.0000011559528,0.0000071427203,0.000058981033,0.000023273129,0.000007566481,0.0047312253,0.9866479,0.008434735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011774114,0.000001010635,0.00021439098,0.00028174743,0.0000020163172,0.000017194063,0.000070021604,0.000017423423,0.000011095279,0.0015614653,0.9978175,0.000004999174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69762284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88075674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30237716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025382427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03015515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6083158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085718539","doi":"","title":"The Competition Bureau and the Public Prosecution Service of Canada launch revised immunity and leniency programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Service (business); Business; Public service; Political science; Public administration; Marketing","score_opus":0.022861639225160515,"score_gpt":0.2684932843717512,"score_spread":0.24563164514659067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085718539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043547075,0.0009324657,0.007352595,0.15072912,0.010051042,0.009819661,0.008976325,0.00868755,0.759904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05059186,0.0003882432,0.007712697,0.027934339,0.0010133408,0.0010303485,0.003504892,0.0008333479,0.9069909],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813541,0.00083350233,0.0005497879,0.0006618503,0.011867654,0.0047330344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278582,0.0097304415,0.001813606,0.0025557461,0.036402844,0.021639118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013215102,0.00096196966,0.0008896582,0.0059227846,0.009148734,0.009362742,0.0042798542,0.012356648,0.089396305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03758429,0.0017030224,0.0013515372,0.0021172492,0.0035983967,0.0023659866,0.003363584,0.011374667,0.024925692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007348277,0.00048142418,0.0036662286,0.000044118115,0.000017991335,0.00011085414,0.0002472753,0.0002497441,0.0007241024,0.009574706,0.95359516,0.031214962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198034,0.00019614129,0.035638172,0.000059664406,0.000032598502,0.000056891466,0.0005951847,0.0010502794,0.00089082174,0.0010930216,0.9600753,0.00011387156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8622237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9358753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13777632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026587702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20178385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2990604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088419429","doi":"","title":"Tribunal de Québec impõe condenação histórica a fabricantes de cigarros, Proc. nº 500-06-000076-980:","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039891438599252003,"score_gpt":0.3425671799231405,"score_spread":0.3026757413238885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088419429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34961835,0.012504452,0.001584911,0.07636514,0.0017800295,0.00025251484,0.00880237,0.00023995819,0.54885226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4966564,0.003502202,0.0011333454,0.004842476,0.000110691035,0.000055554316,0.0009894674,0.00006747893,0.49264228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993082,0.00007270481,0.000018691399,0.00008214849,0.00024058818,0.00027760275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854666,0.00017707281,0.00009386615,0.00006292194,0.0008005459,0.00031886698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008616717,0.00023134472,0.00025274686,0.001161322,0.011399983,0.0030860105,0.00089110126,0.0014661589,0.025960337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025235694,0.00030084632,0.00023380143,0.0018036762,0.0024433322,0.0008138915,0.0015646063,0.0023295227,0.0010680676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030339794,0.00007520183,0.11193642,0.0005470134,0.00010470953,0.002883192,0.027271654,0.0005229364,0.0023395407,0.10956982,0.55967295,0.18477315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011865785,0.000033163476,0.18684644,0.0002582288,0.00003579991,0.0001855624,0.015176959,0.00019168938,0.00071599067,0.00093217194,0.7955734,0.000038807437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0371075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0371075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052776676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26923501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092308306","doi":"10.7202/1071749ar","title":"L’évolution récente du concept d’indépendance judiciaire et les menaces internes à la détermination de la peine juste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035899695317970604,"score_gpt":0.3385506678202538,"score_spread":0.3026509725022832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092308306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056802034,0.06183598,0.31342277,0.08658572,0.0056056953,0.00016892626,0.00036459358,0.00018766889,0.4750266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7973767,0.02939102,0.09822699,0.010561574,0.0041086706,0.00035013273,0.00038875465,0.00033380694,0.05926237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98820114,0.0047412664,0.00076781516,0.0023449392,0.0033657246,0.00057910936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824354,0.009755106,0.001449403,0.0016772259,0.0040331422,0.0006498199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01130291,0.0007162416,0.0007991456,0.0035887382,0.0041657123,0.011966875,0.00204882,0.004197506,0.0067026727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014626593,0.00070572464,0.0012717902,0.004794712,0.034341015,0.016806003,0.004293279,0.011954607,0.0009649723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062040604,0.000004516844,0.00025116012,0.000066189205,0.000008877978,0.000039114057,0.002739256,0.00010141942,0.000102952814,0.9887629,0.0008842291,0.007033163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013750394,0.000042561347,0.0031927302,0.00063112023,0.000035771478,0.0006446494,0.004553123,0.0011917431,0.00062170165,0.66556436,0.323427,0.00008146261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013055662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012864286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013055662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009138358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007977048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06630373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093449273","doi":"","title":"Safeguarding Confidential News Sources? Assessing the Protections in the Federal Journalistic Sources Protection Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislation; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Confidentiality; Privilege (computing); Common law; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.02768329318802379,"score_gpt":0.3273801872224771,"score_spread":0.2996968940344533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093449273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2091828,0.04322347,0.008134562,0.23267,0.00078648474,0.00060900213,0.0030139151,0.00010855969,0.5022712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533757,0.013780822,0.0041900007,0.011672344,0.00027507602,0.00027331722,0.00080794806,0.0000460203,0.015578909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437513,0.0071174344,0.0019707642,0.0016904639,0.037101008,0.00836911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8804908,0.075696275,0.012055396,0.0038912455,0.024037588,0.0038287882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033183265,0.00046385368,0.0006568869,0.009375847,0.008855831,0.015970822,0.0029048673,0.0053844913,0.003021563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12288028,0.00080739014,0.0007984978,0.01023544,0.020003436,0.009158205,0.0039779865,0.007728759,0.00043972032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093988856,0.000081526036,0.035372987,0.0005922099,0.00007784879,0.00023894467,0.022402152,0.0012409488,0.00025118445,0.81173056,0.04443136,0.0834862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056625802,0.00022813516,0.35036355,0.006446513,0.0003911744,0.00029505827,0.035535052,0.003687206,0.0018667227,0.14229847,0.45852172,0.00030975975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86627537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87739366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86627537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0747423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14892526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54229593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093539572","doi":"","title":"Race and Criminal Justice in Canada: An Overview","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09651861466301768,"score_gpt":0.3641162075356282,"score_spread":0.2675975928726105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093539572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014096168,0.94324553,0.00024985304,0.025508413,0.0006939932,0.0000730094,0.0025157612,0.000028278288,0.013588978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06527424,0.92494565,0.0005541422,0.0035316397,0.0004948915,0.000055093922,0.0011642957,0.000022878727,0.0039570765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983271,0.00014405769,0.00010248641,0.00016744551,0.0007418129,0.0005172215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963142,0.0005577806,0.0002733823,0.000037088954,0.002136286,0.0006812474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014917012,0.0008563122,0.0012822248,0.011776916,0.005262689,0.0042293156,0.0014161567,0.002027975,0.006124142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035017976,0.00065983407,0.0011367693,0.025722168,0.0024108721,0.0015042014,0.0019924005,0.002072485,0.00038424923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017461096,0.00021266137,0.14526121,0.0076482133,0.00042620933,0.0005075364,0.0041037705,0.0007558859,0.00014880586,0.016941339,0.20409521,0.6197246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048255337,0.000102162885,0.60857594,0.015992528,0.00095573923,0.00096239726,0.011060815,0.0007903595,0.00014166649,0.005710412,0.35546023,0.00019957288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066116124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066116124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18643224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4797083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W309360223","doi":"","title":"The Languages of Constitutional Dialogue: Bargaining in the Shadow of the People","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yesterday; Shadow (psychology); Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Wish; Point (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Anthropology; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.014352398418619199,"score_gpt":0.31484476972959524,"score_spread":0.30049237131097606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W309360223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029768186,0.019203383,0.023088373,0.2224023,0.0008736682,0.000043381013,0.000078682344,0.00011915992,0.7044229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654108,0.0037960405,0.0028074777,0.007841278,0.00036224193,0.000062529136,0.000030101257,0.000091808426,0.019597653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779369,0.01603703,0.00026783906,0.00071728765,0.0024657329,0.0025752343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850542,0.010548336,0.000732661,0.0009978082,0.00096360856,0.0017035058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017102623,0.0005416666,0.0006611077,0.0026187992,0.025231516,0.030574344,0.0029742913,0.0072841654,0.008525641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02203495,0.00051163643,0.00040511644,0.004341382,0.13867022,0.026319887,0.010921807,0.008427274,0.00089240895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010325681,0.0000032107578,0.00008163041,0.000021454562,0.0000014694286,0.00006495507,0.057778355,0.00007879151,0.000033110184,0.9356922,0.0033822076,0.002852263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014835522,0.0000111082845,0.0004243108,0.000270863,0.0000050474937,0.00008471535,0.10325248,0.00041560238,0.00012133594,0.70721817,0.18814695,0.00003458823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24128541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23770307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24128541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040355142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029896343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47976196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093705965","doi":"10.4324/9781315243450-18","title":"Sentencing Reform in Canada: Who Cares About Corrections?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04622954098586549,"score_gpt":0.33315997077627235,"score_spread":0.28693042979040684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093705965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17524229,0.013030873,0.00046486655,0.76980114,0.001501929,0.00020382382,0.0013550707,0.00007635161,0.038323596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214176,0.0077635767,0.0008763108,0.053918432,0.0006541353,0.00010050684,0.00053141156,0.00006915137,0.0146688875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97406805,0.004666474,0.0009139283,0.0015126558,0.00537898,0.013459928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8897225,0.013642409,0.00693448,0.0015231287,0.049327333,0.03885009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009715864,0.0005443448,0.0015508278,0.004276281,0.028009174,0.015520498,0.0063496404,0.008874845,0.01054594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08852578,0.0010596279,0.0009131317,0.0070864935,0.009787476,0.005851719,0.005279658,0.013931074,0.0006637122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004895326,0.0007947739,0.1952837,0.0012552475,0.00036460595,0.0014155317,0.03209803,0.0028097169,0.00043621368,0.07043681,0.51141065,0.18320519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033719017,0.00029153284,0.5598734,0.0047650198,0.00076457363,0.00055774616,0.10762063,0.0037582845,0.0007513889,0.022574695,0.2979291,0.00077646173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99664474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73400486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26599512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6321902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8513416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094550903","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0006","title":"Meta regulation in data protection law: the risk-based approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Statute; Data Protection Act 1998; Accountability; Risk management; Scope (computer science); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Function (biology); Law and economics; Actuarial science; Computer security; Law; Computer science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.3590182269235872,"score_gpt":0.3352411077949509,"score_spread":0.02377711912863628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094550903","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068697776,0.012606609,0.53774613,0.16133389,0.0024527053,0.0002964228,0.00012355325,0.0003252839,0.2782456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6782063,0.011174663,0.18500045,0.06759285,0.0071006836,0.0017051231,0.00013210803,0.00049125345,0.0485966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9370755,0.036158565,0.0029050093,0.004565051,0.017137742,0.00215819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9426706,0.040684495,0.0025617438,0.0069738226,0.0063390257,0.00077028485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05803223,0.0010401674,0.0013304631,0.0036417176,0.004287552,0.01844216,0.0053034695,0.014247116,0.0047365464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042215485,0.0012588282,0.002718303,0.0024174063,0.046869446,0.023044573,0.00945254,0.024117561,0.0012891084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018021174,0.0000041893054,0.000027087104,0.00001590297,0.0000026685382,0.000013852997,0.00023227642,0.00021210716,0.000031452382,0.99765766,0.0006701159,0.0011309453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008309171,0.000016948426,0.00006403582,0.00031955284,0.000008929746,0.000045786466,0.00019215922,0.0012426904,0.0001807184,0.95946264,0.038438343,0.000019967063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042451755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024551386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05803223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012501579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010200515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30690742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094600681","doi":"10.29173/wclawr19","title":"Innocence and Prevention","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Blame; Criminal justice; Criminology; Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10419797418617617,"score_gpt":0.37346698486029783,"score_spread":0.2692690106741217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094600681","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005317137,0.7187353,0.0056367004,0.14495513,0.0057054125,0.00014217025,0.00012703639,0.000059731225,0.119321436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25062504,0.6483633,0.0061576436,0.07524138,0.0041536693,0.0003627322,0.00017076962,0.000053794112,0.01487165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839803,0.008119118,0.0012852731,0.0013312685,0.0042541847,0.0010299006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97115505,0.019450987,0.0029708992,0.0014703623,0.0037935413,0.0011591383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017089257,0.00055429735,0.0010256207,0.004803425,0.0029123293,0.005704831,0.002075171,0.0044030277,0.0067938017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04867507,0.0003986436,0.00074495876,0.0018407597,0.011833466,0.005134389,0.0049608164,0.006411374,0.0010047978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043510747,0.00021610069,0.0056051584,0.007241418,0.00021720027,0.00030632337,0.0022548176,0.00039552283,0.00017254715,0.49088326,0.047046002,0.44561806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005707447,0.0002599376,0.010601232,0.043282587,0.00025620483,0.0007217818,0.0031301996,0.00024735212,0.0005867703,0.3119688,0.6288278,0.000060249837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015491469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018826095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017089257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004445591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015485185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09037775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095256180","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.412","title":"The authority to order search in a comparative perspective: a call for judicial oversight","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control; Uniwersytet Wrocławski; McGill University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.14768825182116055,"score_gpt":0.43816610989112104,"score_spread":0.2904778580699605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095256180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010451894,0.012159089,0.02444753,0.0908368,0.00043966234,0.000056963938,0.000097359945,0.00003690274,0.86147386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328247,0.0060025468,0.008640156,0.008690561,0.0008983569,0.00014395372,0.00007151811,0.000093279516,0.042634897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867574,0.007349476,0.00040056385,0.0014888007,0.002273212,0.0017305705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799156,0.013190379,0.00095530646,0.0020578217,0.0028592788,0.0010215093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015297395,0.00059416075,0.0011697793,0.0036927266,0.0071207546,0.020974427,0.0042130984,0.013223842,0.014967136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025981994,0.0005242277,0.0011790488,0.002747204,0.046760418,0.024681775,0.0054969876,0.0087882,0.0009501712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033052233,0.0000018795597,0.000021591008,0.00000931543,0.0000014227604,0.00002138198,0.00030171676,0.000114416696,0.000007816316,0.998285,0.0005780986,0.00065395323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018093451,0.000008811773,0.00009115489,0.000108101376,0.000005658141,0.000048436195,0.00081540557,0.00045648176,0.00003831074,0.9725884,0.025812823,0.00000827671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02496768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01952229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02496768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021901049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016102467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15890396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095658211","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Law Journal: Criminal Law Edition (Robson Crim)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Scholarship; Punitive damages; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1065546482413894,"score_gpt":0.33803584010640597,"score_spread":0.2314811918650166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095658211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013126316,0.09633794,0.00043849106,0.052241325,0.022774788,0.00017379274,0.0046051503,0.00029724423,0.8218186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004202669,0.02299811,0.00024499823,0.006135251,0.0019468364,0.00008202469,0.000981436,0.00012556523,0.9632832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991328,0.000063685584,0.00004166387,0.00008509291,0.0005507953,0.00012595313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986098,0.00016856013,0.00005944874,0.000096606884,0.00084915094,0.00021647595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007595197,0.0012047609,0.0005007555,0.003871167,0.007028492,0.0054503297,0.0012314005,0.0031354243,0.21298347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002315265,0.00069547066,0.00033145965,0.007401,0.0018059363,0.002408756,0.0018726367,0.002905443,0.075051114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029541632,0.000008901568,0.00014304786,0.00005544957,0.0000011166691,0.000022728458,0.00014307542,0.000018751325,0.00004124916,0.004681113,0.98050576,0.014375888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011096529,0.0000019723907,0.00074135873,0.00013433628,8.278413e-7,0.000022904858,0.00018245653,0.000010163794,0.000018954708,0.0004925457,0.9983903,0.0000030617703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40651336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6807361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011891495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022624053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8082944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096837467","doi":"","title":"Roderick Muchikekwanape: Convicted killer escapes Canadian prison, may be hiding out in Washington state","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Q13 FOX","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; State (computer science); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06260651595254114,"score_gpt":0.31261379766587905,"score_spread":0.2500072817133379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096837467","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12226035,0.00689272,0.0006491511,0.6533095,0.017798966,0.00048237087,0.0017948936,0.000242959,0.1965691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16346806,0.007046645,0.0005184123,0.17499499,0.0010817661,0.00018744428,0.00042092128,0.00009789952,0.6521839],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922836,0.00006368785,0.000033444234,0.00011826879,0.00014139661,0.000414873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984647,0.00013888838,0.00006534565,0.000025979225,0.0005054346,0.0007996935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074817444,0.00076698355,0.00041466698,0.0012232163,0.031021057,0.0026615986,0.0020596627,0.009311433,0.022051929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003724397,0.00062943186,0.00038630492,0.00070051284,0.002099712,0.0016547581,0.00211735,0.013662027,0.003210616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005224039,0.00009822445,0.01499419,0.000116585485,0.000034324938,0.0061490396,0.011403097,0.00008221914,0.0005355909,0.004004606,0.944212,0.018317848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025331496,0.00011547152,0.050791476,0.0012029988,0.00009649369,0.0043084063,0.2406707,0.00021001721,0.0010001165,0.0012700494,0.7001326,0.00017640095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90680027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09319973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01265297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03929615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18749714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097606201","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679329","title":"Policing Arbitrariness: Fleming v. Ontario and the Ancillary Powers Doctrine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018561553476829605,"score_gpt":0.2688407926203571,"score_spread":0.2502792391435275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097606201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13819997,0.0035825884,0.004036842,0.12260623,0.00024794514,0.00011376162,0.00035632326,0.00004169424,0.73081464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94961,0.0011049361,0.0010392544,0.009429616,0.000161381,0.000034038156,0.000042780925,0.000015192032,0.038562823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961636,0.00049428147,0.00010930359,0.00048478457,0.0014504691,0.0012976502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563897,0.0022171987,0.00063007313,0.00031265247,0.0007777597,0.00042325121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040781344,0.00027951083,0.00038924208,0.00088761805,0.010686315,0.00531786,0.0017478825,0.0089511555,0.0049363268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017056251,0.00041005088,0.00039126797,0.0013051205,0.010896072,0.0028115232,0.0019293405,0.004392939,0.00032595903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097896496,0.00001378823,0.0042883153,0.00004701396,0.000014323523,0.0006931472,0.005012843,0.0007807628,0.00029455748,0.9427401,0.032526467,0.013490797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002890035,0.00006449223,0.03616712,0.0006242669,0.00018644333,0.0005724254,0.0089761615,0.005356771,0.0014176153,0.6090591,0.33702976,0.00025689555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88428503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9410615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11571497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030896913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051904347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23279285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102022006","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3721754","title":"Racial Profiling and the Perils of Ancillary Police Powers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology); Gender studies","score_opus":0.01947878356691712,"score_gpt":0.2968553729822947,"score_spread":0.2773765894153776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102022006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7391618,0.001994168,0.0011193109,0.07822284,0.00041932304,0.00003828479,0.00013144975,0.00001346618,0.17889932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954769,0.00023705437,0.000116864045,0.0016925896,0.000117719865,0.000009079876,0.000011122341,0.000005405491,0.0023331232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989457,0.0054224385,0.00027445977,0.0005654593,0.0013760083,0.0024669915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769718,0.008282007,0.0061036423,0.0015206242,0.002639576,0.0044823475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012662051,0.00014662466,0.00029865323,0.0017685791,0.007378772,0.0064683356,0.0012279915,0.003006256,0.011050472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05720184,0.00023368932,0.00023364878,0.0015710584,0.0062294607,0.005695688,0.0037345611,0.004383121,0.00051695923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006327842,0.0004177655,0.1836819,0.00008736045,0.00005643411,0.0007990759,0.022603482,0.00029276,0.0005217262,0.6807203,0.012611762,0.09757462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009648446,0.00033181012,0.5138047,0.0011592195,0.00016571741,0.001280559,0.11487195,0.0015729603,0.0013437655,0.24545008,0.11980854,0.00011429579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01042725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028842008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012662051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023126153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004835659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06696415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108179891","doi":"10.29173/mlj1225","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada’s Justification of Charter Breaches and its Effect on Black and Indigenous Communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050209020745421926,"score_gpt":0.2705179045605164,"score_spread":0.22030888381509445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108179891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072040364,0.0060459976,0.0020157266,0.4679883,0.003954096,0.0003078638,0.0012396346,0.00010661062,0.44630137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5950363,0.0031090109,0.0022604852,0.24923547,0.001700978,0.00029044933,0.00030471038,0.00015705099,0.14790551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96475506,0.0033235657,0.0012406714,0.0028717234,0.013393012,0.0144159915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94634867,0.020528013,0.0017256794,0.0018763925,0.022473771,0.007047341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01820862,0.001046469,0.0023913088,0.004201727,0.05275852,0.01928274,0.00850627,0.050100345,0.008764166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07604603,0.0025868656,0.0023458928,0.0041401526,0.023547582,0.0041760365,0.006034881,0.055531543,0.0008984661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012508006,0.000081274105,0.00398419,0.000079900754,0.000120284756,0.00076563045,0.0064321323,0.00077253627,0.00036412405,0.7927444,0.18801615,0.0065142727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067321816,0.00009477293,0.02713388,0.0024377592,0.001044163,0.00037241957,0.015515828,0.0043088654,0.0029946668,0.22361884,0.7207581,0.0010475056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98446184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12542395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12542395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32295394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91001874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108439118","doi":"10.22215/etd/2000-04459","title":"The Evolution of private policing in Canada; towards an effective regulatory famework.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.009477628736582422,"score_gpt":0.3060621006606167,"score_spread":0.29658447192403425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108439118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56541735,0.008903312,0.004836404,0.1868548,0.00036676845,0.00018549504,0.0025730913,0.00016408031,0.23069876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722483,0.0014535743,0.0018696337,0.0028163819,0.000040339146,0.00001526126,0.00017745147,0.00003725979,0.0213418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958319,0.00068738667,0.00008181643,0.00035310636,0.0013995701,0.0016461487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880165,0.0015458668,0.0010438851,0.00041450618,0.006365758,0.0026134003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036049213,0.00015885342,0.00028535738,0.002671062,0.0087747695,0.006412349,0.0018485333,0.0025090075,0.0069782236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017932959,0.00029678104,0.00024810375,0.003283147,0.008660191,0.0020778882,0.0020891838,0.002420118,0.00032644699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024840957,0.00016493282,0.13341074,0.0002264547,0.00007875017,0.0008056703,0.025436066,0.008007946,0.0012303424,0.534989,0.088749655,0.20665203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040909286,0.00008270147,0.5242228,0.0005062056,0.000060257677,0.0002350324,0.03300174,0.008358027,0.0010503825,0.041800976,0.390493,0.00014795881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99546045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15621153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15621153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23406231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108470929","doi":"","title":"L’émergence des actions climatiques au Canada à l’ère de l’Accord de Paris","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cairn.info","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.10727923016738093,"score_gpt":0.3439074312594891,"score_spread":0.23662820109210814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108470929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23117907,0.0051671774,0.007235813,0.043861136,0.0007418897,0.0001880889,0.001218575,0.00022511937,0.7101832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866452,0.0021423216,0.0023389175,0.0041687023,0.000063786945,0.00004718756,0.00027184494,0.00007490994,0.20424712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964785,0.00041299764,0.00007237211,0.00043877424,0.0015262375,0.0010712069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675804,0.00049400673,0.00033644988,0.0001637275,0.0015955846,0.00065221713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015216505,0.00037390433,0.00029329705,0.0016969112,0.01288269,0.0072350684,0.0010221964,0.0016717695,0.015579864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004778346,0.00034497536,0.00043943076,0.0027999883,0.005816686,0.001740813,0.0022313837,0.0037418865,0.0007870481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013818483,0.00006583874,0.031020122,0.00038078224,0.00010761722,0.0016039851,0.048497774,0.0018424906,0.0018368973,0.77368444,0.062361844,0.07846001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020764815,0.00005204635,0.06929107,0.00035099644,0.000043468528,0.00017359112,0.024530303,0.0006636404,0.0010476984,0.008401595,0.89533645,0.00008828755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9768946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08072535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08072535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10131896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5857061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109532656","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.07","title":"Suzanne Zaccour, <i>La fabrique du viol</i>, Montréal, Leméac, 2019.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.024816780961681918,"score_gpt":0.24242419461433629,"score_spread":0.21760741365265437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109532656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018594204,0.2591676,0.0008498264,0.45417044,0.021596357,0.00008979906,0.0011259788,0.00020437413,0.2609362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03219771,0.070976816,0.0005860857,0.0617835,0.002861152,0.00009025696,0.00045607198,0.0002611059,0.8307872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814856,0.00036175043,0.000035841582,0.00022947462,0.00070496014,0.00051939767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900264,0.00018393717,0.00006558369,0.000033764292,0.00039741304,0.000316632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014104753,0.00092682015,0.0004084533,0.0010391397,0.012666749,0.005395693,0.0020714141,0.0050136894,0.06278093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031124612,0.0005308692,0.00036243786,0.0016567839,0.005781639,0.0030702048,0.0033954247,0.0063356124,0.009431219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010601851,0.000006470012,0.00028125028,0.00010206368,0.0000023436091,0.000083681516,0.0020856732,0.00003193514,0.00006629748,0.02055441,0.95442075,0.022354705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016926696,0.000001697508,0.00068718893,0.00013038689,9.897011e-7,0.00003109499,0.001227622,0.0000102783115,0.000036629004,0.0007274762,0.99713933,0.0000055092855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7895599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90273285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7895599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033274584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03342701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4233588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109580876","doi":"10.7202/1075599ar","title":"The Presumption of Restraint and Implicit Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Statute; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Sovereignty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042840599871330924,"score_gpt":0.3357891345843867,"score_spread":0.29294853471305576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109580876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09252226,0.0040542865,0.13288015,0.05016133,0.0006325415,0.000129154,0.00027352045,0.00010832051,0.7192385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660701,0.0009202366,0.010574927,0.0032590157,0.00033447976,0.00016767753,0.00007806562,0.00004364554,0.018551957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855261,0.0057825814,0.0010595917,0.0022022168,0.0043522627,0.0010771974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98057073,0.010266642,0.0017461057,0.0049234955,0.0020440246,0.00044897085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010703782,0.0004251403,0.0007581291,0.0018185255,0.0041713356,0.007320477,0.0036834893,0.006403366,0.0070082843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034323983,0.00070902717,0.000831051,0.0011850523,0.047029,0.013552419,0.008330297,0.009393176,0.0015394314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004652817,0.000006347952,0.00014525336,0.00001784427,0.0000026016116,0.000045169454,0.0008600767,0.00007189534,0.00009762699,0.9969086,0.00029038388,0.0015497238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018443445,0.000013510174,0.00037044115,0.00012181662,0.0000076255574,0.00008888655,0.00035027356,0.00043383185,0.00034875845,0.9856493,0.012584375,0.000012829855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006748262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004445912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010703782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046050497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045785713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056607723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109785129","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2020.1822892","title":"Sitting in limbo or being the flaming Phoenix: the relevance of the archival discipline to the admissibility of digital evidence in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives and Manuscripts","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Tianjin Municipal Education Commission","keywords":"Relevance (law); China; Phoenix; Context (archaeology); Law; Transition (genetics); Political science; Computer security; Internet privacy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.07647964900657235,"score_gpt":0.3206665596465246,"score_spread":0.24418691063995224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109785129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77248424,0.0740545,0.0070134304,0.03728807,0.0005862677,0.00017937513,0.00016165384,0.000048008424,0.108184546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97435725,0.01778062,0.0018327525,0.00074449123,0.00012152487,0.000022937475,0.000039399885,0.0000107270525,0.0050903116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959485,0.0012883188,0.00047117894,0.00038385822,0.0014149146,0.0004932136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370605,0.0029665772,0.0010404264,0.0007620304,0.0010491228,0.00047586494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00857948,0.00021016305,0.00038870497,0.00456145,0.006244202,0.007279785,0.0015210797,0.001257091,0.0028286537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011936418,0.0002745159,0.00032517192,0.0070066815,0.016153509,0.006643828,0.004512619,0.0016430881,0.00012405762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010746696,0.00006754814,0.045276493,0.0020215588,0.00008146268,0.003003494,0.16164699,0.0009301254,0.0014570145,0.46215335,0.004581734,0.31867275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039355982,0.00027924383,0.20954946,0.0043247202,0.00026387142,0.0020665296,0.18280827,0.0029050976,0.0062097376,0.15915361,0.43214372,0.00025633362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070203714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099288255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008617091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01758872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1395902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111591130","doi":"10.3968/11932","title":"On the Regulation and Improvement of the Right of Prosecutorial Counter-Appeal in Plea Bargaining","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Appeal; Dilemma; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Criminal procedure; China; Sentence; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02406311713391468,"score_gpt":0.2745460662645503,"score_spread":0.2504829491306356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111591130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060268655,0.0031124225,0.4389995,0.022126304,0.0006266844,0.0005252539,0.00009773341,0.00023842491,0.474005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430232,0.0011626277,0.030747645,0.0031828864,0.0005536611,0.00038844557,0.000036174162,0.00008269458,0.020822654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696829,0.0158865,0.0011704506,0.0048253797,0.0055020805,0.0029327227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602673,0.027273484,0.002688846,0.004688022,0.0040141633,0.0010681358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03098237,0.0006348441,0.0010308105,0.0018562858,0.004107266,0.007062103,0.0033170572,0.005587405,0.010957623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06015366,0.00085380353,0.0015648319,0.001409057,0.020317685,0.010210875,0.006235539,0.009749621,0.0016416197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002627488,0.000032606134,0.00040591028,0.000030882584,0.0000069762405,0.000059986618,0.00047441895,0.001728216,0.0004503229,0.98925567,0.0011103724,0.006418426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008497328,0.00008556414,0.0016221373,0.0002081785,0.000058066846,0.00011190724,0.00042627822,0.02562043,0.0013426987,0.95007527,0.020291084,0.00007344426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008280955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005742248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03098237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062379413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009403448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1638524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112642154","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Canadian Legislation and Case Law: Federal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5680596685653162,"score_gpt":0.5417391408534766,"score_spread":0.02632052771183957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112642154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014855398,0.044075422,0.0049008024,0.0625209,0.0077220243,0.0027814736,0.077217184,0.00203117,0.7972655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010022628,0.061209105,0.018061819,0.006678528,0.0011459695,0.0021559745,0.029805332,0.0011777527,0.8697429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819989,0.002027045,0.001362669,0.0011658967,0.012235097,0.0012104409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.909918,0.017522492,0.0014014189,0.0032958498,0.06538241,0.0024797062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01636184,0.0021375755,0.0022438702,0.021762844,0.012084447,0.018112132,0.005032872,0.006596983,0.27864677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06950825,0.0021935857,0.0013863081,0.039466996,0.005794986,0.007499698,0.0026724965,0.005644686,0.07120935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009502666,0.000020041143,0.00017192942,0.00062231644,0.00000351149,0.000014224899,0.00037133283,0.00011616321,0.000050218077,0.014722609,0.94100386,0.0428943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017842654,0.000006512536,0.0019898925,0.001587998,0.000015891108,0.00001990084,0.0007765871,0.00013761652,0.00016408255,0.0039859875,0.9912669,0.00003088408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9616237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97019804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27864677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103700034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28295857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9321663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115887807","doi":"10.29173/wclawr37","title":"The Right to Silence and the Pendulum Swing: Variations in Canadian and Scottish Criminal Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Right to a fair trial; Presumption of innocence; Justiciability; Constitutional right; Common law; Statute; Human rights","score_opus":0.035821348309807786,"score_gpt":0.3124186517150486,"score_spread":0.27659730340524086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115887807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5293262,0.013974479,0.0015342808,0.04433086,0.0004174087,0.00013569044,0.0010209982,0.000112847214,0.40914723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97598517,0.0034447664,0.00085232,0.004268075,0.00005825944,0.000019318466,0.00025073174,0.000067950576,0.015053326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886883,0.0011704125,0.00042810378,0.0009926893,0.0054925126,0.0030474726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97794455,0.0045281723,0.0011854672,0.0006744506,0.012554186,0.0031131173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008358327,0.00038858346,0.0005492909,0.007282897,0.019972071,0.011987161,0.002448597,0.0016919762,0.0059128404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024752554,0.00039180226,0.0007090887,0.012120421,0.015953341,0.00270975,0.004913088,0.002608987,0.00031231195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002134647,0.0000908013,0.07666043,0.0003990037,0.00011953399,0.0020466566,0.24271157,0.00071893446,0.001330384,0.47659615,0.049568836,0.14954424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004156612,0.000077797464,0.39830118,0.0009683967,0.00013811192,0.0008707952,0.12323469,0.0007371837,0.00068318675,0.016556509,0.4579501,0.0004404459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122870974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122870974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10529063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89149547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117581872","doi":"","title":"SHOPKEEPER’S PRIVILEGE: COMING TO A STORE NEAR YOU?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Privilege (computing); Law; Corporation; Political science; Business; Liability; Computer security","score_opus":0.04474109172410389,"score_gpt":0.33428936882677385,"score_spread":0.28954827710266995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117581872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054219496,0.44083056,0.00057797635,0.39223555,0.0048531005,0.000082008104,0.0004936311,0.000028204166,0.106679454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47313303,0.37190816,0.0007573073,0.13150477,0.0024689306,0.000037115173,0.00029316128,0.000026119116,0.01987142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964818,0.00049930176,0.00016332317,0.00029248136,0.0016188914,0.0009441771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897439,0.002938785,0.0008641845,0.00021908054,0.004615822,0.0016182798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038871088,0.0002589982,0.00056726055,0.0022098226,0.00881502,0.0067193448,0.0020144333,0.005574031,0.0025029345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120042395,0.00034530094,0.00043599718,0.002348041,0.010121603,0.002504079,0.0015156788,0.006764418,0.00037089203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020981336,0.000094501775,0.023139363,0.0049961368,0.0001397509,0.0033184953,0.02297814,0.00022458484,0.0008493723,0.22808702,0.46235874,0.25360405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055574656,0.00008251117,0.042979036,0.009069131,0.00033893134,0.0011163225,0.024286095,0.00012224728,0.0005378332,0.010964961,0.91032606,0.000121384015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95637447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043625534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03623406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13414197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26289773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118406741","doi":"10.15173/ijrr.v3i2.4582","title":"Shifts in the significant risk threshold","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.021875635667998473,"score_gpt":0.3146973945310843,"score_spread":0.2928217588630858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118406741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057399743,0.032991406,0.004040716,0.6984823,0.12102395,0.000047022215,0.00014037947,0.00010093716,0.13743336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47243357,0.064467825,0.0060601756,0.22770338,0.1411409,0.00007184451,0.00012038749,0.00036138573,0.087640606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868144,0.0013028351,0.00041662581,0.00093928335,0.009072216,0.0014546727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97738945,0.007846098,0.0006465828,0.0004361667,0.011951504,0.0017302011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006713256,0.00055055413,0.0008925195,0.0028380733,0.013147836,0.01597739,0.004091552,0.008623297,0.0049486174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037436735,0.00037574494,0.00066790014,0.0017214967,0.026407199,0.0050185993,0.0025443898,0.015339262,0.00043077284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003095343,0.000013726963,0.0004682044,0.0002529811,0.00001755029,0.0003086538,0.008199332,0.00029882204,0.00038772033,0.5212865,0.43589228,0.032843318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075768025,0.000014111687,0.0023772633,0.00078145287,0.000028099897,0.0001643889,0.0066042673,0.00033026628,0.0002557192,0.077695474,0.9116411,0.00010023194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6628744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81483173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6628744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044026285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065341145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67822194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121157541","doi":"","title":"The Institutional and Substantive Effectsof the Human Rights Act in the United Kingdom","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International law; Law; Kingdom; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.054285899526758226,"score_gpt":0.343612094592552,"score_spread":0.28932619506579377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121157541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79482156,0.021997677,0.00054585637,0.04248378,0.00039304377,0.00006480854,0.00095126533,0.000024143299,0.13871789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872701,0.002506988,0.0000988014,0.0015475064,0.000041326184,0.0000164699,0.00006414101,0.000008164287,0.008446622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897474,0.0044161435,0.0007777025,0.00049282424,0.0018692086,0.0026967865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97868437,0.013289342,0.0029811286,0.0010124948,0.0030885416,0.0009441567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055256556,0.00022456577,0.00051465334,0.001910336,0.0036171558,0.008544933,0.00092876796,0.0030908922,0.011510981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029531306,0.0005206512,0.0005116701,0.0021167216,0.005642976,0.0028605233,0.0049518584,0.0024985964,0.0005385639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023917528,0.0003864513,0.095540665,0.0014273897,0.00029361542,0.0034027472,0.025877025,0.0075781746,0.0017574942,0.74393797,0.040626615,0.07678012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028931472,0.00035065456,0.7114306,0.001756848,0.00044414375,0.000438631,0.028294433,0.002527541,0.001986545,0.04796357,0.2042208,0.00029682115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4764707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57642925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4764707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025252089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013817673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94739467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121225154","doi":"","title":"Sniffing Out the Ancillary Powers Implications of the Dog Sniff Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Doctrine; Dissent; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Search and seizure; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038769248112420794,"score_gpt":0.3250363933978203,"score_spread":0.28626714528539954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121225154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2562613,0.008083144,0.01057879,0.30435398,0.0024697296,0.00013622087,0.00017572362,0.000048664286,0.4178925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94303566,0.0027689443,0.0018939712,0.035069194,0.0007298526,0.000027843502,0.00003256316,0.000027235832,0.01641485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902114,0.0021601887,0.00028855,0.00070697797,0.004896456,0.0017364543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845567,0.010274721,0.0010601477,0.00038720758,0.003089696,0.0006314883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013387616,0.00038598024,0.00048580393,0.002097139,0.010536829,0.007883357,0.0031775227,0.0072013894,0.0022751377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033020616,0.00039822294,0.00051844306,0.0014582749,0.024870014,0.007375454,0.0038376737,0.010233571,0.00026476567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045823923,0.000025594276,0.0020255838,0.00006484458,0.000017936556,0.0011403833,0.0073714335,0.0005118516,0.0004110916,0.96177256,0.015819652,0.010793396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013594018,0.00014510738,0.0144247385,0.0010587178,0.00018077911,0.0007627637,0.037617322,0.00440538,0.0042429366,0.5692403,0.36753288,0.00025320513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29063198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5783491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29063198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017749371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022891419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5778806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121240205","doi":"","title":"Offence Definitions, Conclusive Presumptions, and Slot Machines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Normative; Nothing; Function (biology); Law; Criminal law; Epistemology; Position (finance); Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.047114428625259434,"score_gpt":0.32527035994316905,"score_spread":0.2781559313179096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121240205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04256873,0.00870162,0.28511462,0.04320107,0.0014618277,0.00019591166,0.00081654,0.00030160265,0.6176381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90658516,0.0026124143,0.059647538,0.0038387298,0.00055363355,0.00028081387,0.00040530643,0.00020194768,0.025874468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98421085,0.0064996085,0.0016303681,0.0021141178,0.0042137825,0.0013312307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97448605,0.016642848,0.001851885,0.0034823061,0.0029579438,0.00057895447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011571837,0.000863568,0.0010747489,0.004112014,0.005998834,0.011606444,0.004725917,0.0059668412,0.009021644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03680275,0.0012675371,0.0011955457,0.0035583866,0.040197194,0.02225853,0.0049949726,0.007674505,0.0011934283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023086181,9.974591e-7,0.000030956413,0.00001127648,7.0924426e-7,0.000010552859,0.00035587416,0.0000448138,0.000011615255,0.99811494,0.0004414742,0.0009745244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005602829,0.000005217213,0.00016829997,0.000084248226,0.0000050449344,0.000048474223,0.0005218485,0.0005253532,0.00013714828,0.973976,0.024509272,0.000013574676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022780906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02840806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022780906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011002627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064016343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07983005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121386091","doi":"","title":"The 'Great Writ' Reinvigorated? Habeas Corpus in Contemporary Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Law; Writ; Political science; Doctrine; Charter; Sociology; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.044504727123854684,"score_gpt":0.29174367547162167,"score_spread":0.247238948347767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121386091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22283436,0.036645293,0.0019444205,0.23912947,0.0018776399,0.00009189728,0.0011979741,0.00017545723,0.4961035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012982,0.011871476,0.0016528543,0.016245738,0.00020401452,0.000043944237,0.00021294809,0.00012632733,0.06834445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978229,0.00020323129,0.00004385467,0.0002483688,0.0007234293,0.00095821265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756765,0.00052947755,0.000121801444,0.00011428924,0.0011512681,0.00051560084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002161678,0.00030161598,0.00042543723,0.0024754002,0.03047154,0.008857501,0.0021012812,0.0022467866,0.008421949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005116527,0.00037885708,0.00025062892,0.0052065365,0.02161495,0.0039513665,0.0042316336,0.0038807732,0.0003271196],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038337916,0.000015055943,0.004237601,0.00012726219,0.000011009261,0.00051100744,0.049661994,0.000281601,0.00035567264,0.8298384,0.07743893,0.03748315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010664592,0.0000090009025,0.014648205,0.0004576804,0.000025628055,0.00017867403,0.08042798,0.0004263606,0.00044968454,0.041187134,0.8620492,0.00012979204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99808276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14246306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14246306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17345937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121450697","doi":"","title":"Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Canadian Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.022195066896264853,"score_gpt":0.2671570873081357,"score_spread":0.24496202041187085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121450697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004445762,0.0041155694,0.0037466662,0.035092838,0.004573755,0.00074025476,0.005562343,0.00031518875,0.9414077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06167966,0.0054103443,0.015983682,0.051684763,0.00081240304,0.0007929399,0.0031947438,0.00025423407,0.8601872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831818,0.0009960744,0.0006059321,0.001011755,0.010026564,0.004177866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862462,0.0021528502,0.00050152553,0.00063806644,0.008903081,0.0015582744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061373007,0.0008951715,0.0006581619,0.002646853,0.018432403,0.008405796,0.003054616,0.008972713,0.02261306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021005735,0.0011688409,0.0011879167,0.003133909,0.0054986957,0.0019155589,0.0017637552,0.00980971,0.0053347354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002815398,0.00003175548,0.0009718956,0.00009617477,0.0000061199926,0.0001281518,0.0010318476,0.0003589011,0.00034856074,0.39660832,0.5865411,0.013848944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015750444,0.000015975427,0.003939366,0.0002235572,0.000011592769,0.00007587553,0.00050486455,0.00019227482,0.00027232853,0.008431656,0.98621666,0.00010011445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99221075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06273359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06273359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26934505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45516616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121563406","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Criminal justice; Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Economics","score_opus":0.06677401222662385,"score_gpt":0.3303004870182024,"score_spread":0.26352647479157854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121563406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4334816,0.012607603,0.0013611908,0.017927034,0.00020557769,0.0001602854,0.00011092824,0.000013556227,0.5341322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810993,0.0057419273,0.0008182624,0.0020221542,0.000032294953,0.000058695896,0.000051971787,0.000014164649,0.010161167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884348,0.0044585564,0.0003313433,0.0005089015,0.0032641962,0.003002204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217755,0.0037847648,0.0006744695,0.00022191048,0.0022254917,0.00091589434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009030793,0.00027604314,0.0006248921,0.005906988,0.019006869,0.0076084323,0.001255595,0.0018689585,0.0035499325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022658346,0.00037344443,0.00039521503,0.010412421,0.014662745,0.004508866,0.0037438516,0.0039724377,0.00015366024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001355198,0.00011512576,0.015847981,0.0003737847,0.000058243724,0.0015897738,0.3117586,0.000996426,0.0007037877,0.6027189,0.007851648,0.05785022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042008443,0.00013525195,0.18241793,0.0014351885,0.00009733232,0.00039667205,0.5675294,0.0011120477,0.00062511605,0.024680354,0.22138128,0.00014757064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93868005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08307588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08307588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064572416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60276055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121620811","doi":"","title":"“Detention” under the Charter after R. v. Grant and R. v. Suberu","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Political science; Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Remand (court procedure); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0501916679819801,"score_gpt":0.3192826819509025,"score_spread":0.2690910139689224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121620811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4847525,0.010078718,0.022798141,0.21374165,0.005998849,0.00068266096,0.0007588576,0.0005298968,0.26065877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277338,0.0015083476,0.004240887,0.026027557,0.0004067095,0.00012228485,0.0000978694,0.000047821806,0.039814774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98115313,0.0038769194,0.0005868168,0.0014986751,0.0077780453,0.0051065157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878016,0.006768096,0.0010276565,0.0005666986,0.0029139493,0.0009219038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010620566,0.0004930917,0.00047338367,0.0010834592,0.00923402,0.0033288973,0.002286041,0.0074237967,0.001475178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027646177,0.00045596086,0.0009998732,0.00085954694,0.0074952627,0.002312855,0.0026770285,0.012547454,0.00024858938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016305129,0.00013011538,0.008721724,0.00012868317,0.000045728408,0.0026935798,0.020227142,0.0012143324,0.0023558,0.8278767,0.08226077,0.05418238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023976126,0.00089679094,0.061083972,0.00072892284,0.00040745243,0.0030730388,0.025906904,0.0043144207,0.013174068,0.12038599,0.76868004,0.0011086803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4949117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6776172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4949117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0155866975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045809276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121800950","doi":"","title":"Clements v. Clements: A material contribution to the jurisprudence - The Supreme Court of Canada clarifies the law of causation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Windsor; Jurisprudence; Causation; Test (biology); Tort; Political science; Common law; Liability","score_opus":0.0875953254984473,"score_gpt":0.3425636486344378,"score_spread":0.2549683231359905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121800950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009807111,0.03365129,0.0062135933,0.56465673,0.009698903,0.00016652797,0.0005399946,0.00012131747,0.37514457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40262246,0.022659691,0.009081062,0.42371616,0.0074235676,0.00014159486,0.00032175757,0.00014845823,0.13388528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788275,0.002915316,0.0007051758,0.0015703321,0.012601289,0.0033805051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872343,0.005975824,0.00045646087,0.0005558114,0.004872302,0.00090530695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010148272,0.0006844514,0.0007116491,0.0026899509,0.018929956,0.010209305,0.003962127,0.017316608,0.004684843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02932956,0.0007048791,0.00076701277,0.0024307799,0.019246573,0.004027582,0.0043121097,0.013588144,0.0006281787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018077817,0.000010241923,0.00056728197,0.00008721265,0.0000115976745,0.0006017758,0.0023340562,0.00021771112,0.000118155105,0.7516603,0.22873373,0.01563982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031152224,0.000016487897,0.0027527253,0.000844533,0.000054357864,0.00037218025,0.0013826551,0.0007088665,0.0004447262,0.07203451,0.9212223,0.00013565634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.937459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9706979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06657494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06657494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13176386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48303723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121854992","doi":"","title":"L’action collective au secours du droit d’auteur","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.034388022732535155,"score_gpt":0.2863502425095217,"score_spread":0.2519622197769865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121854992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23654513,0.0014859005,0.016715018,0.014218161,0.0011055825,0.00035177064,0.00012183738,0.00021582797,0.7292408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6499246,0.00063293683,0.004954364,0.0016344212,0.0001726403,0.00015457957,0.00006822305,0.00008695913,0.3423713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939017,0.0017977067,0.0002644168,0.0008527941,0.0019253389,0.0012579601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991385,0.001651218,0.0010084466,0.0017656423,0.0024896506,0.0017000943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004465257,0.00045596503,0.00035258496,0.0013267702,0.0114457365,0.005516136,0.0011757038,0.0020119576,0.02414904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097888205,0.00031546847,0.00050225266,0.000882598,0.010710267,0.0027400479,0.005947248,0.0029761104,0.0033284414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014858747,0.00020139193,0.01856965,0.00043655172,0.0000736882,0.0022329066,0.27588558,0.0006830195,0.013434652,0.4255301,0.032007355,0.23079644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020359637,0.00018761732,0.0312602,0.0004899493,0.00004017365,0.0005514164,0.08743692,0.00041345487,0.0026286568,0.012717114,0.8641661,0.00008812437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15740784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2783492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15740784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072869314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020519545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3129832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121879578","doi":"","title":"Framed by Section 8: Constitutional Protection of Privacy in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Search and seizure; Privacy policy; Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Internet privacy; State (computer science); Section (typography); Data Protection Act 1998; Privacy by Design; Constitutional law; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy protection; Political science; Right to privacy; Context (archaeology); Information privacy law; Profiling (computer programming); Business; Law; Computer science; Supreme court; Geography; Advertising","score_opus":0.03578978219224712,"score_gpt":0.24020716226852978,"score_spread":0.20441738007628266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121879578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07901987,0.004310396,0.011172852,0.0721496,0.0008761002,0.0006608543,0.0028978232,0.0002473163,0.82866514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8064339,0.0031025098,0.015464528,0.04029209,0.00037630857,0.0006313767,0.0010170027,0.00009635525,0.13258585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781964,0.0024957745,0.00094789104,0.0019578342,0.008984561,0.0074175773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98568195,0.0043311063,0.0006815514,0.0011933333,0.0066221063,0.0014899499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008918955,0.0005260058,0.0007778743,0.0021240371,0.018218467,0.012871706,0.0033988615,0.009049301,0.0053597745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020119902,0.0010377701,0.0009650922,0.0024905566,0.015086019,0.0029938237,0.0039947876,0.008928549,0.0005604327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027011652,0.00001307493,0.0013152406,0.000037991893,0.000009694702,0.00019753867,0.0039328495,0.0005791951,0.0003785811,0.9715868,0.017511291,0.004410665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015637542,0.000076197706,0.02154299,0.0009436349,0.00012983773,0.00037866263,0.008146504,0.0034675524,0.0018210213,0.21401238,0.74886364,0.00046118788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98745185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11760167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11760167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.281253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85326385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121942453","doi":"","title":"Propriété Intellectuelle, Cour Suprême Du Canada Et Droit Civil","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Art; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.00974194046619861,"score_gpt":0.25089572231471535,"score_spread":0.24115378184851674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121942453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34303126,0.01865426,0.0026686685,0.038578395,0.0007755333,0.000068867885,0.0041989116,0.00010727205,0.5919168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89683694,0.0061225044,0.001309684,0.0018125509,0.00041491978,0.0000439685,0.0006494917,0.00005474035,0.09275527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99277425,0.0008905087,0.0002534656,0.00071924203,0.0038140651,0.0015483401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830958,0.0074922577,0.0013761198,0.0004396468,0.0057691312,0.0018271282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003951751,0.00071162323,0.0010376662,0.006188129,0.012860732,0.015098977,0.0017366871,0.003116282,0.0228413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027482446,0.0004148722,0.0009490263,0.0076413383,0.009984432,0.004899655,0.002619822,0.007584122,0.0011194012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033880645,0.00015679069,0.10212376,0.00035478754,0.00029865795,0.0011438013,0.011465601,0.0022916389,0.00042793225,0.7717182,0.032192033,0.07748807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013650137,0.00014629301,0.5330729,0.001440918,0.00027585105,0.0012613658,0.030320648,0.0025943336,0.0013598407,0.07714424,0.3518623,0.0003846739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97641945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98188424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06089535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06089535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078618236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4418288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121976183","doi":"","title":"R. v. Khawaja: At the Limits of Fundamental Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Statute; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.13409736895316915,"score_gpt":0.4401468566850881,"score_spread":0.3060494877319189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121976183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118093796,0.010373648,0.011030488,0.1430773,0.001339842,0.00025200826,0.00045917602,0.00042967056,0.71494406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005049,0.0018598026,0.0033490371,0.058078565,0.00039051584,0.00014880834,0.00008390122,0.000069133435,0.035515442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98850006,0.0015911035,0.0005087665,0.00192737,0.0037419314,0.0037308743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293923,0.0041126125,0.00039557283,0.0006468579,0.0014690945,0.00043661662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007470851,0.00053283153,0.0007671794,0.00084429036,0.01276951,0.014916946,0.0029253212,0.0137003185,0.0034155129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015176186,0.00093405443,0.0009972887,0.0008294628,0.02051944,0.007075709,0.0043195845,0.018706001,0.00081357243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022949887,0.000010511593,0.00031788234,0.000034128607,0.000006325783,0.00011861314,0.0025594954,0.00012318698,0.00029502137,0.9845604,0.008245619,0.0037057067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019338584,0.00016617458,0.0064935326,0.00070850016,0.00016540143,0.00064066006,0.0074095726,0.0014813211,0.0027614085,0.62708646,0.35247532,0.00041837085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50649226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6074584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49350774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024940683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040323198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99282825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122023523","doi":"","title":"Moral Rights in Canada: An Historical and Comparative View","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Waiver; Jurisprudence; Law; Anonymity; Convention; Moral rights; Legislation; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Prejudice (legal term); Right to property; Human rights; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.07528376541315537,"score_gpt":0.3068270752748078,"score_spread":0.23154330986165242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122023523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027617607,0.09466009,0.0012255487,0.07091175,0.0012571597,0.00004763454,0.0005789234,0.000036432153,0.80366486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77111226,0.14532328,0.0017968273,0.01168758,0.0009443755,0.00008214648,0.0003804302,0.00011280619,0.068560414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372685,0.00080938055,0.00009693729,0.00047826828,0.0025772557,0.002311319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953755,0.00097207504,0.0002548333,0.00012556685,0.0025495342,0.00072246476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028662265,0.00058711786,0.00068342127,0.00896796,0.030561263,0.016284311,0.0022534484,0.004268603,0.009537338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058359676,0.0004336102,0.00040375412,0.018952662,0.024336655,0.0058159325,0.0031757213,0.0059578344,0.0006156834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020706078,0.000025062673,0.0010546524,0.0001863437,0.000011081728,0.00031000603,0.01849995,0.00025668557,0.000086168686,0.9204938,0.032602433,0.026453247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072143253,0.0000147723185,0.0072078244,0.00082658406,0.000023417053,0.00022370968,0.022000471,0.00035159718,0.00011576446,0.03451061,0.9346532,0.00006489123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99186826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26645246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26645246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20266798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8508112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122149169","doi":"","title":"Two Myths of Administrative Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory interpretation; Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Standard of review; Statute; Duty; Legislature; Common law","score_opus":0.04916571809114916,"score_gpt":0.3941677685298033,"score_spread":0.3450020504386541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122149169","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051895855,0.005584513,0.013554031,0.902218,0.0025268637,0.000040754232,0.00005258837,0.00006448991,0.070769176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.593699,0.009741514,0.027297111,0.31638813,0.012816291,0.00072255975,0.0001226444,0.00025628755,0.038956508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96009254,0.018546717,0.0014470959,0.004630804,0.011607318,0.003675456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95053023,0.029724345,0.002485008,0.0058427914,0.008032759,0.0033848232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043146595,0.00051490875,0.000868582,0.004158058,0.011005072,0.019535257,0.004044073,0.011828973,0.0034663791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057939425,0.00061652367,0.0008850444,0.0020233525,0.12567751,0.022130253,0.008865274,0.024564529,0.00091988925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057475254,0.000011785432,0.000091685615,0.000019274277,0.0000020863856,0.000014735781,0.0029693893,0.000052190047,0.000021256652,0.9847039,0.008907,0.0032009059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029349889,0.000018345194,0.00032682286,0.00021695899,0.000004010646,0.000081357764,0.0033669127,0.00031867056,0.00013613341,0.85130274,0.14417097,0.000027686658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021999976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013502182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043146595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01775644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024399005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22818375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122179429","doi":"10.3138/utlj.11117-2","title":"CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND CONCEPTIONS OF PENALITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction; German; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Universal jurisdiction; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03976751809362463,"score_gpt":0.31766872520294265,"score_spread":0.27790120710931804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122179429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12770237,0.020861696,0.024908846,0.016230825,0.0002792045,0.00002275516,0.00008725299,0.000028932494,0.8098781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369216,0.0020077361,0.001188002,0.00042414648,0.00011060407,0.000022691289,0.000024964775,0.000013899921,0.0025156534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958241,0.002517057,0.000101930695,0.00040015392,0.0005564434,0.00060038577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773043,0.0013420098,0.0002813016,0.00020766679,0.0002635225,0.00017509575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036580958,0.0003496122,0.00044393327,0.0050616907,0.0060529616,0.007683287,0.0010471197,0.0020371897,0.0035154833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004400328,0.00022959338,0.0004095294,0.0027277365,0.048950106,0.010374412,0.005267617,0.0032363907,0.00015644604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013007033,0.0000013704195,0.00007291971,0.0000054777947,9.410737e-7,0.000012698548,0.0013014455,0.000043656986,0.000009873751,0.9979358,0.00009999581,0.00051454216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008200002,0.000021892214,0.0027433939,0.00022329803,0.000013022852,0.00023713641,0.011672257,0.0004826182,0.00012527569,0.9185011,0.06595487,0.000016833048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006579211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061781546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007683287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007377528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018820227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05352801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122414803","doi":"","title":"Open justice and suppressing evidence of police methods: the positions in Canada and Australia [Series of two parts] Part 1.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne University law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Series (stratigraphy); Project commissioning; Political science; Criminology; Criminal justice; Publishing; Sociology","score_opus":0.16517730287131535,"score_gpt":0.4365781877813235,"score_spread":0.27140088491000813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122414803","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01691636,0.5820277,0.0010429816,0.31854495,0.0075640506,0.0003867193,0.00038474388,0.000031180294,0.07310136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3441713,0.38079792,0.0043626186,0.19041471,0.008469146,0.00045208036,0.00037838382,0.00015798782,0.07079598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9409632,0.011804674,0.003097877,0.0025720084,0.03465456,0.0069077113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85399026,0.06341839,0.008651397,0.0029286677,0.06310824,0.0079031205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0406029,0.0006789397,0.0016473557,0.010481146,0.010881148,0.015300549,0.0047002523,0.012679644,0.003671192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13960011,0.0011685147,0.0012042583,0.011224851,0.024805468,0.0074853543,0.004825653,0.012464242,0.00044164344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020856618,0.00018686928,0.009136801,0.004691077,0.0002780311,0.00036108113,0.014547167,0.000519045,0.0006004091,0.3789124,0.4151208,0.17543775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010850016,0.00017455456,0.10492986,0.008014738,0.0005582886,0.0003072698,0.013899924,0.00065931014,0.001289181,0.055217374,0.8145398,0.00030118303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9441998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9758069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09341591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09341591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24860238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.677783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122434101","doi":"","title":"Muscutt Misplaced: The Future of Forum of Necessity Jurisdiction in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Connection (principal bundle); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Geology","score_opus":0.010413372428683869,"score_gpt":0.26532788934522583,"score_spread":0.254914516916542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122434101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12325477,0.020587958,0.008376093,0.52888906,0.0031660427,0.00021354124,0.0027718,0.00017004367,0.3125707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8981505,0.006869933,0.006679444,0.061199006,0.0006899673,0.000102566504,0.000594375,0.000119544726,0.025594696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751152,0.002544084,0.0007816592,0.0020302355,0.012169704,0.0073591927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449525,0.011643609,0.0021414363,0.0017002956,0.031045496,0.008516661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013693883,0.00044230404,0.0015386055,0.004259689,0.01995887,0.01536519,0.00588253,0.008699714,0.010809879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06470016,0.00067094585,0.0013214105,0.005034797,0.015707225,0.0079868045,0.005784194,0.010967023,0.0004613714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010225414,0.00002937912,0.014399258,0.0001871602,0.00006775553,0.0004290645,0.003628097,0.0010353159,0.0002137875,0.8547844,0.0890695,0.03605403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022196042,0.00011584769,0.065398455,0.0021432408,0.00042864712,0.0004945624,0.022052333,0.008342423,0.0015949892,0.3022383,0.59624195,0.0007273005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99205303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1495051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1495051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3819544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98645353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122457892","doi":"","title":"Police Questioning in the Charter Era: Adjudicative versus Regulatory Rule-making and the Problem of False Confes-sions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Parliament; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Criminal procedure; Silence; Politics","score_opus":0.07814882466621065,"score_gpt":0.36307306211005885,"score_spread":0.2849242374438482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122457892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062735215,0.017523102,0.10533818,0.6836873,0.0030171375,0.00023791686,0.0001524687,0.00023130339,0.12707742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.866746,0.0063125007,0.033535197,0.07949006,0.0043760017,0.00047519145,0.00006803127,0.0001558865,0.008841165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7874682,0.14269488,0.008259969,0.014180294,0.04004373,0.0073530125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6042333,0.33671427,0.020908011,0.016889058,0.018789168,0.002466231],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21232656,0.0005940064,0.0021662896,0.004156104,0.009100174,0.036694285,0.006800465,0.029290082,0.0018365872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3013863,0.0016043397,0.0016131151,0.00311651,0.07278355,0.024480172,0.006833379,0.030307235,0.0007440148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028260944,0.000027718292,0.00072891806,0.000056928402,0.000013129155,0.00021035274,0.0043296665,0.00040858483,0.00021126891,0.97288734,0.0076584644,0.013439396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013664513,0.00010713234,0.0026092352,0.00097262487,0.00008016056,0.00033751878,0.0039452906,0.0043740557,0.0019933807,0.9006423,0.08457533,0.0002263277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01616187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012528634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98383814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012135874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018552363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9713416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122546123","doi":"","title":"Small Claims Disputes in Nova Scotia and Access to Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Nova (rocket); Criminology; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0833404281761269,"score_gpt":0.33912659551722435,"score_spread":0.25578616734109744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122546123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8870331,0.008228909,0.00020006055,0.017186882,0.00026944204,0.0000434266,0.00012081803,0.000007088083,0.08691028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98746943,0.0012679072,0.00007443686,0.0011194738,0.000043304048,0.00000882072,0.00003609476,0.0000021194755,0.009978404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981102,0.0003189325,0.00009624671,0.00013732458,0.00033834428,0.0009989227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932714,0.0027142074,0.0015631156,0.00012681508,0.0007748577,0.0015495883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014736574,0.00013251018,0.00021411588,0.001153248,0.009067021,0.0055606775,0.0011034406,0.002101211,0.002911511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077208206,0.0002317507,0.00017890526,0.0015378401,0.0058505014,0.0009239585,0.0031972786,0.0021002896,0.00016903915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064368686,0.0002402773,0.3046279,0.0006482737,0.00008352483,0.047835592,0.16848372,0.0030344478,0.0031979633,0.35863274,0.03919488,0.07337705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005564026,0.0001518932,0.7551008,0.00084206765,0.00005461708,0.003550742,0.094062276,0.0015780927,0.00083743717,0.012865353,0.1307668,0.00013430054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8761439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9595767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12385613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037288386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018475205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2705474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122678072","doi":"","title":"Crime Victims and Constitutional Rights","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Law; Constitutional right; Supreme court; Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.013721003292570822,"score_gpt":0.3010310579319528,"score_spread":0.287310054639382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122678072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059705272,0.006130957,0.006695678,0.06331364,0.00062098383,0.000096898664,0.00021265369,0.000041094558,0.8631829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95262736,0.0034847914,0.0010312913,0.0071050157,0.0005709803,0.000084231324,0.000103523234,0.00003284897,0.034959942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466467,0.0021497183,0.00025957482,0.000600133,0.0009576434,0.0013682913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941407,0.0030715612,0.0011031888,0.0007227693,0.00049563195,0.0004660783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060643614,0.00025225143,0.00048201875,0.0022683525,0.0056176437,0.008646446,0.0013571965,0.004498049,0.024919353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015640859,0.00026268323,0.00042244446,0.0017413062,0.034738287,0.0062884414,0.00579614,0.005155574,0.0010417779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023601424,0.000005452825,0.00035740845,0.000009331643,0.0000022064814,0.000052104635,0.00095981895,0.000023668537,0.000015140541,0.9951751,0.0013436783,0.0020536126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033502896,0.000038356276,0.0040641087,0.00034558267,0.000027782531,0.0006873702,0.0075246883,0.00014884929,0.0003245328,0.7331272,0.25364572,0.000032394917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008658209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008547494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024919353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003019122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004378793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08336359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122694758","doi":"","title":"Why Can't We Be Like France? How the Right to Bear Arms Got Left Out of the Declaration of Rights and How Gun Registration was Decreed Just In Time For the Nazi Occupation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Opposition (politics); Possession (linguistics); Politics; Left-wing politics; Martial law","score_opus":0.04641019634464937,"score_gpt":0.299991437671563,"score_spread":0.2535812413269136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122694758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028168742,0.021022499,0.001639008,0.76860505,0.006227137,0.0000293224,0.0001452181,0.00021500049,0.17394798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57767683,0.012055225,0.0020107548,0.25077215,0.00271473,0.00006246621,0.00015801081,0.00036707305,0.15418284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404514,0.0024470254,0.000084645806,0.0007362022,0.0007750809,0.0019119164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805236,0.0004484605,0.00020619977,0.00013112268,0.0005514862,0.00061039825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042657326,0.0007891843,0.00049976364,0.0011796425,0.020222005,0.02338813,0.0011707185,0.011964908,0.015660694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076154745,0.00036837393,0.0010094855,0.0010506901,0.02179169,0.013044914,0.0027815995,0.012578693,0.0042704036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009521222,0.00007025465,0.0047259093,0.00013589859,0.00007202928,0.0012662993,0.041670114,0.00028493718,0.00045346643,0.613489,0.29612172,0.041615114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019550846,0.00006330808,0.0037991789,0.00039332898,0.000017269627,0.00041650614,0.026855959,0.00011685376,0.00017806298,0.030899271,0.93715733,0.00008338619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18877678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16956879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18877678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018380767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007429118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37535596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122798332","doi":"","title":"Searching for Smith: The Constitutionality of Mandatory Sentences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Punitive damages; Political science; Proportionality (law); Constitutional review; Constitution; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.09996215917625473,"score_gpt":0.391120778265037,"score_spread":0.29115861908878227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122798332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25931397,0.010682523,0.026459873,0.06879945,0.0012148216,0.00030769655,0.00048476315,0.00053742353,0.6321995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688757,0.00079932006,0.0042409934,0.006500289,0.0003027622,0.000112905254,0.00006155705,0.000078760306,0.019027814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843881,0.0037218693,0.0010641351,0.0022603339,0.0048695477,0.0036960205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825677,0.0109563805,0.0013259313,0.00093184656,0.0032321212,0.0009860243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012060976,0.00037106517,0.000815084,0.0015147164,0.011137248,0.0096403565,0.0030973593,0.0057917396,0.004071116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030402651,0.0011333288,0.00053745235,0.0009790023,0.013165518,0.004695149,0.003499745,0.008164245,0.0005419357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035311292,0.000014129914,0.0005857489,0.000051325427,0.000008457941,0.00021806931,0.0035870825,0.00016282154,0.0009487276,0.9778481,0.0053621335,0.011178056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015404006,0.00033801614,0.016260624,0.0009826898,0.00025388267,0.0006919983,0.006647861,0.0037951719,0.009844551,0.67548275,0.28514272,0.00040570644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26512632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4301193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26512632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017571952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031576805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52716625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122808219","doi":"","title":"The Oversight of Executive Police Relations in Canada: The Constitution, the Courts, Administrative Processes and Democratic Governance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Politics; Political science; Separation of powers; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013859310018390253,"score_gpt":0.27402845296017175,"score_spread":0.2601691429417815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122808219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23055434,0.033593792,0.00652383,0.19848765,0.00093492336,0.0002431828,0.0010428352,0.00024177729,0.52837765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929481,0.0072562085,0.0022027695,0.0069035552,0.00012188097,0.00004536447,0.00018014212,0.000050829884,0.053758126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99135584,0.0007307401,0.00015606583,0.0004737352,0.0030437633,0.0042397454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936147,0.0014433621,0.00047601183,0.00022855344,0.002895358,0.0013419988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031768037,0.00039413443,0.00048040276,0.00237684,0.02146984,0.014947606,0.0016562303,0.0024011186,0.0038752786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010022371,0.00057328725,0.00038086288,0.004913193,0.01598023,0.002657398,0.002766938,0.004380635,0.0002322079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004726491,0.000028274377,0.014211946,0.00015423817,0.000019319701,0.00044587706,0.018947141,0.0024091455,0.0003431637,0.88785,0.033509206,0.04203444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006915836,0.000051914427,0.10255707,0.00084763294,0.00008412259,0.00024569072,0.038084008,0.00396662,0.00096974167,0.11639997,0.736461,0.00026311324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99774134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27190995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27190995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43810764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8444812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122961693","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.30619","title":"Wither International Law? Security Certificates, the Supreme Court, and the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; International human rights law; Political science; Human rights; Reservation of rights; International law; Public international law; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.01103091151819874,"score_gpt":0.2604447960094575,"score_spread":0.24941388449125879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122961693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46420875,0.017808832,0.0010758743,0.18492804,0.0008858539,0.000095130956,0.00053360325,0.000040934323,0.33042294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634384,0.0044757854,0.0002973485,0.007982858,0.000067310284,0.000013406607,0.00008088859,0.000018099774,0.02362596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659604,0.00031340937,0.000065449414,0.00025351878,0.0008967952,0.0018747263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994351,0.0015557734,0.00048369114,0.00015119993,0.0017591034,0.0016992084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024620104,0.0002604602,0.00049793936,0.0018834403,0.025166972,0.011629161,0.0021648316,0.0036089555,0.00759099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010420747,0.00033576746,0.00037691407,0.0036420377,0.015498059,0.003687618,0.0039123846,0.0069797733,0.00025544467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007218272,0.00008034522,0.026434476,0.00015137992,0.000032898446,0.0011482439,0.03714191,0.00043395173,0.00022545583,0.8481342,0.05110398,0.035040863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010513416,0.00007285473,0.09835594,0.0016639337,0.00022178612,0.00066721154,0.1984894,0.0019948627,0.001213315,0.09817964,0.59869385,0.00034202661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13759105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13759105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22377808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230603","doi":"","title":"Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada's Long-Gun Registry as Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Legislation; Law; Repeal; Gun control; Federalism; Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.01987016449860858,"score_gpt":0.2900390755757322,"score_spread":0.27016891107712365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123230603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5686098,0.0058347476,0.005537396,0.13109079,0.00089753215,0.0005316655,0.0010044217,0.00013376423,0.28636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182339,0.003679656,0.0027761583,0.016114935,0.00012636255,0.00015992654,0.00028014445,0.00007714286,0.05855192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891272,0.0016735217,0.000257761,0.00063797337,0.003020798,0.0052827117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194556,0.002421288,0.0005979715,0.00040782118,0.002331003,0.0022962717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006327279,0.0005208987,0.00051105715,0.0019255156,0.035622403,0.0070835277,0.0039122733,0.0091208145,0.0052551483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012817617,0.00053906225,0.0007248393,0.0053953347,0.009305524,0.0022078825,0.004720208,0.0073203626,0.0004228234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015613316,0.00029929192,0.048454493,0.00041871736,0.0000743608,0.073636584,0.10016771,0.003293186,0.0010688137,0.5725127,0.14566341,0.05425461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009194228,0.0001807269,0.03600238,0.00088375475,0.00014168408,0.016724847,0.1956572,0.002449359,0.0017895658,0.014630793,0.7311882,0.00025963146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09685224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09685224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1574634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7027155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123231957","doi":"","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice & the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Justiciability; Duty; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Rule of law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05603704184581181,"score_gpt":0.3688218263243543,"score_spread":0.31278478447854247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123231957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16371462,0.010583007,0.0027106863,0.084058106,0.00044431328,0.00017307045,0.00045189803,0.00008123742,0.73778296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423706,0.0046706055,0.0014228845,0.0036642035,0.000051539777,0.000033074568,0.0001162647,0.000035881363,0.04763495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916835,0.0008649492,0.00019146228,0.000502191,0.0032053676,0.0035525009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899621,0.0027660504,0.00046487382,0.00036039285,0.003442159,0.003004477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004538563,0.00026225034,0.0005141461,0.0024823972,0.027264157,0.012885958,0.0017501462,0.0027196852,0.0105828345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014459875,0.00043797167,0.00035825677,0.0037140609,0.017659802,0.0031395778,0.004535561,0.005346374,0.00027992073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017859022,0.000025277006,0.0043470305,0.000080126636,0.000009196456,0.0003625759,0.009786557,0.00062143727,0.0001643559,0.94296104,0.01701146,0.024613095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056657365,0.000046629262,0.054580018,0.00062110065,0.00005059522,0.0003121503,0.023922015,0.0023317067,0.00075995893,0.1379138,0.77918386,0.00022150206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99621946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20719509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20719509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36833072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9195413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123265210","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1128","title":"The Charter of Whiteness: Twenty-Five Years of Maintaining Racial Injustice in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Charter; Political science; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Racial profiling; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Critical race theory; Mass incarceration; Race (biology); Criminology; Racism; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05880741501285712,"score_gpt":0.33170948987890886,"score_spread":0.2729020748660517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123265210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40348268,0.035322886,0.0031253356,0.42801344,0.004720178,0.0001281473,0.00028408345,0.00015602866,0.12476724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456916,0.006434756,0.0011562585,0.021234028,0.00040612306,0.000036273756,0.00007819791,0.000068669346,0.02489418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843918,0.0027165997,0.00031436846,0.00096461136,0.005727214,0.005885352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98047,0.0025030274,0.0011193958,0.0007140274,0.008301918,0.006891651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017650994,0.0006124568,0.000555665,0.002904573,0.07002123,0.01614129,0.0032185994,0.003950524,0.0025430215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020222392,0.00056651485,0.00058806315,0.0027048218,0.038847666,0.005291183,0.007276119,0.0082231965,0.00018186944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020445285,0.00015089013,0.030620692,0.0003202974,0.00010128865,0.0009826623,0.40998894,0.0012762093,0.0019090534,0.23955844,0.13314803,0.18173908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002430902,0.00020989618,0.068323895,0.00070678984,0.00012780979,0.00023273128,0.22956103,0.0005648716,0.0012296254,0.0155541655,0.68304294,0.00042189923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98393804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99246734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14867388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14867388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27551192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98741764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123285976","doi":"","title":"Beyond Finality: R v Hart and the Ghosts of Convictions Past","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Confession (law); Federal Rules of Evidence; Political science; Admissible evidence; Suspect; Reasonable doubt; Duty","score_opus":0.0477950287016182,"score_gpt":0.3620190832449032,"score_spread":0.31422405454328495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123285976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10150447,0.0098797735,0.017656734,0.38846257,0.0035240455,0.00018840168,0.00021355803,0.00019256293,0.47837794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802044,0.0017755842,0.002769061,0.08026459,0.0014788824,0.00007760288,0.00009188489,0.000107684966,0.033230394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801839,0.006139387,0.000942629,0.003758118,0.0041351244,0.0048408406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715865,0.016954562,0.002123975,0.0028306101,0.0042687813,0.0022355716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030680707,0.00036525435,0.0009979417,0.0016502606,0.019443087,0.015624929,0.003994004,0.022181874,0.0047540176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06315038,0.00079983927,0.0011300397,0.0009987954,0.042729963,0.0125312,0.0084054945,0.028610008,0.0008358486],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021549282,0.000016758224,0.0010956682,0.000028759065,0.000014124092,0.0012178991,0.0070208446,0.00015022383,0.00007729963,0.96155006,0.02194813,0.0068586483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006288827,0.00009173869,0.0027678285,0.0007955814,0.000067115856,0.0017098563,0.009808982,0.0006634643,0.0006024572,0.73248947,0.25074804,0.00019247683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05890699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072398044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010005136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018733094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16225702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123377603","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1023","title":"The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Administrative law; Statutory law; Political science; Judicial deference; Judicial activism; Autonomy; Statutory interpretation; Standard of review; Action (physics); Judicial opinion; Judicial discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.06541899757497943,"score_gpt":0.3560236760628816,"score_spread":0.29060467848790217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123377603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0853775,0.0142967785,0.05914863,0.44457763,0.0022873415,0.0003653673,0.0005413793,0.00039960898,0.39300576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91271275,0.0039448817,0.022006126,0.026995705,0.00075975107,0.00012378358,0.000075664575,0.00015121009,0.033230074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672058,0.0059273792,0.001130571,0.0029156904,0.019999392,0.0028212972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96966684,0.011457484,0.0015875226,0.0020310958,0.013532449,0.001724706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017814782,0.00051188597,0.0006715943,0.004735589,0.020438371,0.019502683,0.0026854582,0.0047264127,0.0025382747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048544407,0.0008836944,0.0007935079,0.005162931,0.03692861,0.0051935497,0.0047653136,0.0077981153,0.00027967078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014811753,0.0000051609013,0.001259091,0.00005697904,0.000009387856,0.00007319443,0.0045678667,0.00022645458,0.00022476344,0.96681374,0.008128862,0.018619565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097564014,0.000104653845,0.023855727,0.0007397958,0.00013367456,0.00053690077,0.007088852,0.0042364625,0.0014975182,0.4795238,0.4818581,0.00032688843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9334827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9701855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89413404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10586593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11798203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7681147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123466186","doi":"","title":"Toward a harmonized approach to animal welfare law in Canada - A comment.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Law and economics; Political science; Public economics; Law; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08945803012929887,"score_gpt":0.2655153726892904,"score_spread":0.1760573425599915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123466186","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064501713,0.001153521,0.00016473216,0.9862629,0.00390273,0.0000436765,0.00025042213,0.000033021177,0.007543874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032113064,0.000564806,0.00030925433,0.9841069,0.0020870217,0.00004664538,0.00006028036,0.00002616147,0.009587633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98148465,0.0018396053,0.0017200203,0.0022738806,0.0077808374,0.0049008867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501351,0.02312025,0.0017719297,0.0010437167,0.01844722,0.0054818112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014578234,0.0010374552,0.0021467214,0.0020333563,0.026899064,0.010038158,0.010994028,0.15292227,0.00960126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056553196,0.0016742088,0.0026844852,0.0035095804,0.012489029,0.0072052768,0.0048414404,0.089041434,0.0035755376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049772974,0.00002760857,0.00085055834,0.00009777489,0.000024944691,0.00054224645,0.0008976403,0.00009727173,0.00016660392,0.0235416,0.96817344,0.0055305706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016990262,0.000040822226,0.003154759,0.000680745,0.000119650555,0.00033819696,0.0031042425,0.00059768197,0.0005007818,0.022128224,0.9689831,0.00018187812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8808843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.947977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15292227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055045452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20145224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39938462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123641313","doi":"","title":"A More Lasting Comfort?: The Politics of Minimum Sentences, the Rule of Law and R. v. Ferguson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Rule of law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04272593862801228,"score_gpt":0.33448787251338763,"score_spread":0.29176193388537536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123641313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008794527,0.012488945,0.00073275354,0.91214025,0.0011913443,0.000008071943,0.0000270282,0.000010614296,0.06460647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5763784,0.0068070367,0.0010883242,0.38432094,0.003926475,0.000040246246,0.00002567752,0.000062627296,0.027350292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005824,0.004629866,0.00019767002,0.0011365841,0.0022217738,0.001755767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059147,0.006964488,0.0004639871,0.0002364279,0.000744474,0.0009992007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116368765,0.00027890923,0.00068532774,0.0008730037,0.015723703,0.012194029,0.00157033,0.016790653,0.0025430059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020397965,0.0003751665,0.00041143136,0.0007908081,0.041923612,0.00905615,0.0027317707,0.02146046,0.00038076396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021610922,0.000015238237,0.0002517869,0.00001883443,0.0000044063136,0.000118365526,0.0036004006,0.000059719536,0.000108874265,0.9226991,0.068358876,0.004742677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065124084,0.000049022463,0.0027448286,0.00043420214,0.000030315792,0.00018336563,0.013255312,0.0003652682,0.00037057654,0.649285,0.33308977,0.00012724983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29636902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42722067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29636902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020834109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016652659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5892879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123693333","doi":"","title":"Improperly obtained evidence in the&#13;\\nCommonwealth: lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Law; Jurisdiction; Convention; Conformity; Scots law; Political science; Legislation; Common law; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.18527211324114032,"score_gpt":0.396091479276055,"score_spread":0.21081936603491466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123693333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04359312,0.29995683,0.0035157555,0.5801296,0.0034549676,0.00007974211,0.00009074125,0.000016158143,0.06916301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.633593,0.19402008,0.005149048,0.1359915,0.0018984843,0.00017070015,0.00008100183,0.000050950643,0.029045308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97423744,0.014592155,0.0026573555,0.0015590292,0.0041149682,0.0028390368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9178916,0.060124233,0.003926361,0.0037923881,0.010799589,0.0034658392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04413512,0.0003966232,0.00133357,0.003853154,0.0054797893,0.017626496,0.002476406,0.01133769,0.003447971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0885472,0.0008191375,0.0007024733,0.0033652624,0.027672343,0.017888697,0.008966096,0.011665627,0.000505671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008869235,0.000060407878,0.00317678,0.0022315113,0.00004910367,0.0026814144,0.05183825,0.00023356493,0.0004188122,0.7502041,0.031834584,0.15718286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060847255,0.0002473137,0.022781108,0.020977566,0.00011144096,0.002644253,0.07781444,0.0004128827,0.00075460697,0.30591697,0.56800115,0.00027738183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20751669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35733438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20751669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020117868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03758793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41261756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123816104","doi":"","title":"What Butler Did","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Objectification; Supreme court; Criminal law; Criminal code; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10494825153257663,"score_gpt":0.3652403799615271,"score_spread":0.26029212842895044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123816104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055214004,0.011826495,0.0038597872,0.34851044,0.015354888,0.00011436794,0.00046291508,0.00015466014,0.614195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08171605,0.004548454,0.002394509,0.18670346,0.0027103717,0.00012470718,0.0002783322,0.00020351316,0.72132057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406236,0.001803744,0.00016893739,0.0017301465,0.0013802022,0.00085461285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959111,0.00098985,0.00021387753,0.00058031804,0.0013573734,0.00094743405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030362022,0.00047914463,0.00037285834,0.0008137705,0.006607088,0.011973772,0.0013391491,0.0074646943,0.047422696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011757586,0.00040346733,0.0004267303,0.0006424512,0.0064797113,0.0073701954,0.004936458,0.007525318,0.017061727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047012683,0.000038992912,0.00096831756,0.00016381848,0.000013724753,0.00025835237,0.00591132,0.000050433016,0.00031217618,0.55565387,0.3985175,0.0380644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007840482,0.000008947822,0.00019516598,0.00010106121,0.0000064008386,0.00010648569,0.0013337422,0.000021167849,0.00015657577,0.014252827,0.98380023,0.0000095962505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035661705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059932724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047422696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073108333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008812229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15864474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123944707","doi":"10.1080/09546553.2018.1432211","title":"Yesterday’s Law: Terrorist Group Listing in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Terrorism and Political Violence","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Terrorism; Listing (finance); Proscription; Yesterday; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02449064130932022,"score_gpt":0.30980397285378236,"score_spread":0.28531333154446215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123944707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16686125,0.01610058,0.0024087282,0.2923932,0.002217254,0.00022295404,0.0019123186,0.000119710065,0.517764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.792637,0.007717995,0.0021461418,0.09268481,0.0003302219,0.000082552164,0.0005207975,0.00007914305,0.10380131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940789,0.00056348584,0.00021550794,0.00058152806,0.002574304,0.0019863683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98871887,0.0036645168,0.000643105,0.000360035,0.0048772674,0.0017362527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048664496,0.00029354883,0.00039215726,0.0018800828,0.024947047,0.009420475,0.002500859,0.0053061466,0.005689491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012711087,0.0004927346,0.00041931143,0.003754092,0.010268103,0.0023123182,0.0024264029,0.0074063223,0.0002932951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076849785,0.00006473833,0.022300482,0.00022493342,0.000041610558,0.0017534296,0.022259653,0.0005591083,0.0005450404,0.6809814,0.23184164,0.039351135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006146046,0.00007172905,0.056405477,0.00087830244,0.00012500373,0.00048284294,0.023550505,0.001201964,0.001051239,0.020231968,0.89568275,0.00025674622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99853027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13485815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13485815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24617873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123945254","doi":"","title":"Tracking ‘Terrorists’ or Solidifying Stereotypes? Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act in Light of the Charter’s Equality Guarantee","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Terrorism; Law; Tracking (education); Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0525581576463101,"score_gpt":0.3182461462045441,"score_spread":0.265687988558234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123945254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56155646,0.0022012673,0.0021444706,0.23095535,0.0008651654,0.00013997525,0.0029039583,0.000043173983,0.19919014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98182684,0.0004942845,0.0009412259,0.008855033,0.00009485592,0.000035002366,0.00024740104,0.000012013958,0.0074934806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047464,0.0029852958,0.00027295633,0.00052756834,0.003562012,0.0021774299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619461,0.012542145,0.0054035103,0.0023901847,0.01496191,0.002756053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013031127,0.00029744217,0.00047322665,0.002794725,0.008854613,0.0068353624,0.0020431469,0.003650266,0.0048710215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05762459,0.0003242151,0.00027522846,0.004815128,0.0074224924,0.0058100745,0.0023314308,0.0052850726,0.0004771304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032352147,0.00042467532,0.39425582,0.00020441492,0.00014111135,0.00018698067,0.04867977,0.000984473,0.00037967451,0.23682784,0.1932703,0.124321416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009545597,0.00011456431,0.638129,0.00064499455,0.00024884858,0.00006217253,0.10821607,0.003159633,0.0025173258,0.05859135,0.18802543,0.00019513542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98361117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035071492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028215645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061024733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20471978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124354858","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.1.308","title":"Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Secrecy; Acknowledgement; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Confidentiality; Law and economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Masking (illustration); Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19723020262983734,"score_gpt":0.4376579170917017,"score_spread":0.24042771446186437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124354858","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034515128,0.013518439,0.43722093,0.41371447,0.007002552,0.0038381156,0.00044790455,0.000516982,0.089225486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59216726,0.0063335174,0.2794445,0.09786073,0.0064731007,0.005824499,0.00018447965,0.00039819002,0.011313711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.26944077,0.5034856,0.059597034,0.022952704,0.13852315,0.006000711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1575002,0.7048834,0.024195984,0.054870956,0.05592322,0.0026262724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.58430034,0.0011938262,0.0036160853,0.009216721,0.012801234,0.021127785,0.01270007,0.020828702,0.0028165288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73612964,0.002639288,0.0022075744,0.0068408065,0.052157026,0.022553245,0.019636434,0.030481191,0.0028342947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038003622,0.00008136186,0.0043483158,0.0023244864,0.0002899405,0.0009308837,0.028450193,0.0014881899,0.0010397339,0.7772672,0.02942338,0.1539762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018067635,0.00011155366,0.0014844028,0.004612408,0.00013967765,0.0013344504,0.0057936953,0.005111721,0.0015443504,0.84106743,0.13830844,0.0003111568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004939328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045362865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58430034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009057155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022246664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124371828","doi":"10.29173/alr243","title":"Conceptions of Privacy: A Comment on &lt;i&gt;R. v. Kang-Brown&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;R. v. A.M.&lt;/i&gt;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.04705594501995303,"score_gpt":0.31280550185294653,"score_spread":0.2657495568329935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124371828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003569564,0.009292036,0.00028899603,0.9766906,0.0055431337,0.000020357247,0.00021779705,0.00003341957,0.007556699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050731194,0.0030742364,0.00037448903,0.9793123,0.0062227496,0.00008571121,0.000050611394,0.000043641194,0.0057630558],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98404986,0.004285877,0.0017596552,0.002809617,0.005239788,0.0018552361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435865,0.04502796,0.0023765222,0.0013415671,0.006418211,0.0012491246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022480173,0.0016286535,0.0028585817,0.002752471,0.013853749,0.009517122,0.010469481,0.08304092,0.0077688983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043261,0.0019035509,0.0033350806,0.004617028,0.023522252,0.016028734,0.004364748,0.06582162,0.0040814355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024908373,0.000013361079,0.00016807581,0.00015644978,0.000011687587,0.00012990012,0.0013293349,0.00006255375,0.00007835275,0.08602491,0.91008675,0.0019137532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001250298,0.000053014304,0.0025778855,0.0017513443,0.000088619665,0.00028963812,0.0026101116,0.00033315277,0.00052759174,0.06464892,0.9267993,0.00019535236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15637916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2299358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84362084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013709489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020425726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31093788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124416878","doi":"10.1177/1365712717690752","title":"Loosening the law’s bite: Law, fact, and expert evidence in <i>R</i> v <i>JA</i> and <i>R</i> v <i>NS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Face (sociological concept); Status quo; Hearsay; Political science; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.21898713318697063,"score_gpt":0.4240047522478299,"score_spread":0.20501761906085927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124416878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043212213,0.015646886,0.015006315,0.7318355,0.0016749746,0.00009122285,0.000119758864,0.00005068584,0.19236243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8641071,0.006493478,0.007980099,0.10482662,0.0017425161,0.00008208467,0.000060860748,0.00008252918,0.014624769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97388136,0.011256578,0.0010546583,0.0018958249,0.0078091775,0.0041024406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94119465,0.04809109,0.001883381,0.0020679084,0.005257064,0.0015058983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040594295,0.0006239405,0.0012049525,0.004232084,0.023629496,0.032515645,0.0044630948,0.023982752,0.0038371775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08163026,0.001131937,0.0009874547,0.003082281,0.090344064,0.032400344,0.008508516,0.026754802,0.00041272966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730876,0.00001208072,0.0005488668,0.000062376246,0.000011998978,0.0007057288,0.01633218,0.00013238277,0.00012245215,0.9636953,0.010719816,0.007639628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042517822,0.000028935852,0.0025005655,0.0012170494,0.000058712543,0.00053630647,0.03295133,0.0009431062,0.0006004177,0.7894349,0.17152318,0.00016297736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44659105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55569875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44659105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033344224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035813324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124568432","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.2.157","title":"The Litmus Test of Legitimacy: Independent Adjudication and Administrative Segregation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Litmus; Legitimacy; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Test (biology); Imprisonment; Subject (documents); Computer science","score_opus":0.09757585497193504,"score_gpt":0.3395621777628097,"score_spread":0.24198632279087468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124568432","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24497673,0.009659771,0.04010805,0.35369337,0.0016986834,0.00039001275,0.00062141416,0.00008492829,0.34876704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773196,0.0012922529,0.00519041,0.009139784,0.00079760974,0.00007805249,0.0000826309,0.000030052139,0.0060695587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93492436,0.02491392,0.0027710784,0.0066142343,0.024836577,0.005939884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69422865,0.23261765,0.01704764,0.014742891,0.034959927,0.0064031645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06305217,0.0004843352,0.0019430565,0.005530162,0.02164494,0.013516945,0.004985204,0.010231623,0.0078018424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3268392,0.00064501486,0.00097116426,0.006497925,0.08191845,0.01598989,0.009002731,0.013770722,0.000513107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117097276,0.00003892479,0.008376515,0.000092829934,0.00003833082,0.00024824034,0.004702824,0.00026107626,0.000057142617,0.9677444,0.004691223,0.013631499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042933348,0.000109910994,0.022188915,0.00082905806,0.00017705803,0.00030623446,0.008013967,0.0050528236,0.00078642974,0.9108589,0.051097922,0.00014944914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6552173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6541683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3447827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032329492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082092434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6936264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124609147","doi":"","title":"Dunsmuir's Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Deference; Supreme court; Standard of review; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Doctrine; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05852698514068313,"score_gpt":0.36641939578292443,"score_spread":0.3078924106422413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124609147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028388104,0.02007287,0.006025156,0.92890143,0.009620434,0.00007601974,0.0002492729,0.00017782144,0.03203817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17195302,0.013385666,0.018309291,0.7600399,0.012311947,0.00022442608,0.00024325865,0.00029807174,0.023234429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8572507,0.024987094,0.012583144,0.013366659,0.08486441,0.0069479137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7745737,0.102624185,0.0070833494,0.012309222,0.098072626,0.0053370018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11848402,0.00072277273,0.0012515993,0.006579809,0.012243385,0.021512372,0.006125335,0.018066384,0.0021921457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2852549,0.0010665145,0.001566401,0.0059040817,0.02614855,0.008752848,0.0040044487,0.025790239,0.0008747106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035598852,0.000009964725,0.00076054496,0.00021631771,0.00004352231,0.00014261898,0.0021305096,0.00019400453,0.00028272567,0.6547308,0.31128475,0.030168688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004827399,0.000038054444,0.003234927,0.00091796526,0.000082309845,0.00019666008,0.0011873425,0.0007557078,0.0007701287,0.12009309,0.87244517,0.00023046094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57499456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61430717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57499456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053421352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082739405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85501677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124650751","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1242","title":"Beyond Self-Congratulations: The Charter at 25 in an International Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Cultural rights; Law; Perspective (graphical); Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; International law; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.030083288701501745,"score_gpt":0.357012665060272,"score_spread":0.3269293763587703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124650751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015492452,0.01435653,0.0024517397,0.2711983,0.0046591465,0.000041321528,0.00011780629,0.00006897586,0.6916136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628337,0.010346421,0.0016729048,0.034939557,0.0016328949,0.000050690353,0.00010627116,0.00019312659,0.18822442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346775,0.0018460881,0.000085409636,0.00039702866,0.0014220042,0.00278175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330246,0.0017831584,0.0002574443,0.00037174433,0.0021330654,0.0021522301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005506445,0.00063147116,0.00044731185,0.001455142,0.024369923,0.018713407,0.002099864,0.004101113,0.006577839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01195097,0.00020911366,0.00040619093,0.002311324,0.0364539,0.007250377,0.0042750333,0.011972114,0.0005699883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000938197,0.0000105962245,0.00039203605,0.000023341468,0.0000026718626,0.00016705984,0.030427637,0.00013135358,0.000041989126,0.8886337,0.07012673,0.010033538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034202565,0.000007981944,0.0012148435,0.00017858666,0.0000066450198,0.00006278357,0.046698455,0.00010467746,0.000114354334,0.03366845,0.91790843,0.00003140626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8905966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92942363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10940337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06031117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09908833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43759018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124683041","doi":"","title":"Navigating the Fine Line of Criminal Advocacy: Using Truthful Evidence to Discredit Truthful Testimony","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Harm; Law; Cross-examination; Political science; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Scholarship","score_opus":0.2914187536965564,"score_gpt":0.4346985201472391,"score_spread":0.1432797664506827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124683041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092982516,0.029115826,0.045595106,0.547508,0.0013244259,0.00028924661,0.00011291586,0.00016504241,0.28290686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8950859,0.014536325,0.048224993,0.029770775,0.00026008527,0.00010121044,0.000044385153,0.0000648522,0.011911513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9450609,0.029467843,0.0023936138,0.0017583326,0.01790628,0.0034130893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8940996,0.07881499,0.005764279,0.0039058602,0.0142923705,0.0031227844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06375107,0.0005802098,0.0007185911,0.0057493197,0.019771518,0.02003871,0.0046012197,0.007992984,0.0027341803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1284596,0.000897557,0.0005258158,0.0027353377,0.04000975,0.011653104,0.011592006,0.009713557,0.00051089714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000747487,0.00009201747,0.008428828,0.0010788662,0.00007132822,0.0015285526,0.096451305,0.0008306559,0.0012088342,0.60344124,0.022782031,0.26401165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009258744,0.00014539846,0.013833174,0.009567838,0.00028243245,0.0015503163,0.0962357,0.002369349,0.0054219505,0.41140294,0.45871022,0.00038816358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60740167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8313535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60740167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03455154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14040233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78982085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124722718","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2347033","title":"Counting on the Court: The Preservation of Fundamental Freedoms and Liberties in the Era of the Security Revolution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Civil liberties; Politics","score_opus":0.01910575680561668,"score_gpt":0.27063227480383784,"score_spread":0.2515265179982212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124722718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13986878,0.004023638,0.013944027,0.13422726,0.0013303516,0.000040136965,0.00015154513,0.000076413875,0.7063377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704717,0.00096638803,0.0016451296,0.0057128253,0.00065136695,0.000027863534,0.000030589825,0.000050012794,0.020444153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945478,0.0022312517,0.00016873257,0.00082983164,0.0009660869,0.0012562054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067885,0.0048625455,0.00073893945,0.0022584305,0.0008527691,0.00060839526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00802169,0.0003638937,0.00080140785,0.001052743,0.010113466,0.0121700615,0.0018060817,0.0058057816,0.014338997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026152369,0.0003294855,0.00047792334,0.0014290096,0.031260584,0.015427398,0.006265519,0.010283728,0.0011472251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003167735,0.000012046482,0.00021521974,0.000012182207,0.0000038017406,0.00006258009,0.0012993214,0.00019902902,0.00009783485,0.9821469,0.006656425,0.009262871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013659072,0.000010386983,0.0004147964,0.000045170145,0.0000075800112,0.000042972533,0.0011106845,0.0002617048,0.00023788755,0.9657837,0.032056812,0.000014661887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005441737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007256228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014338997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038834468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005583935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047968745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124783219","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1012","title":"Book Review: Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Common Law Procedural Traditions, by Paul Roberts and Jill Hunter (eds)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.028603034759155887,"score_gpt":0.31872944199691877,"score_spread":0.2901264072377629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124783219","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038232905,0.96511036,0.0002622373,0.02057254,0.011252403,0.000012184013,0.00009074372,0.000017060258,0.0026442152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008083058,0.9558736,0.00068432355,0.017386032,0.014873934,0.000053993404,0.0001488246,0.000035306628,0.010135725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812967,0.0005260292,0.00017878017,0.0001744147,0.00090535264,0.00008571261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859045,0.009875973,0.00070887903,0.00023011627,0.002834383,0.0004461837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027515683,0.0013705773,0.0026653125,0.008349633,0.00096095196,0.005271776,0.002094468,0.0048117866,0.013313167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01374342,0.00087141176,0.00088430254,0.013499641,0.002972407,0.0052982997,0.001810903,0.0049736067,0.0054374416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013595886,0.000010098933,0.000062619976,0.0024654684,0.00002934816,0.000022477028,0.00005322279,0.00005637671,0.00004805899,0.0029786087,0.9325414,0.06171865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019702706,0.000017212331,0.00043366093,0.0060793227,0.000066277134,0.00023737902,0.000115130606,0.000056455094,0.000047330912,0.004862294,0.9880476,0.000017641527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014921229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06849966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014921229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003643722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010021577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044537008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124816542","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries: Examining the Regulation of Prosecutorial Discretion and Misconduct in Canada and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Political science; Dismissal; Discretion; Law; Accountability; Innocence; Tort; Jurisdiction; Wrongdoing; Economic Justice; Tort reform; Culpability; Liability","score_opus":0.01340213047541248,"score_gpt":0.2616171957947579,"score_spread":0.24821506531934542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124816542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7955288,0.024933547,0.0012518652,0.049308587,0.0003604265,0.00014098143,0.0006181917,0.000032170352,0.12782541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860874,0.0048675584,0.00071005995,0.004708971,0.000024029701,0.000034854012,0.00017157398,0.000019803312,0.003375853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934309,0.0014295086,0.00020813363,0.00044201707,0.0019126319,0.0025769316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834327,0.004198977,0.0015533563,0.0003946786,0.0085101575,0.0019101308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039671343,0.00033860686,0.00057795946,0.0065473984,0.017080858,0.011008632,0.0019438342,0.0021124994,0.0015872915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01472169,0.0004348657,0.0006431702,0.012283748,0.010705371,0.002318588,0.0037441878,0.0032815353,0.000109811415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003703025,0.00022405674,0.35141537,0.00060285424,0.00035353383,0.0016431893,0.17903061,0.003045052,0.00097330956,0.33888185,0.03706104,0.086398855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008750449,0.00011189637,0.44246826,0.0014874238,0.0005496089,0.00021676082,0.42879614,0.0016941564,0.001070282,0.010084297,0.1131956,0.0002380434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99576294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99760157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15450023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15450023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1499008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125352381","doi":"","title":"\"Chartering\" in the Shadow of Lochner: Guindon, Goodwin and the Criminal-Administrative Distinction at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Shadow (psychology); Psychology","score_opus":0.06865969122698284,"score_gpt":0.32342380307887975,"score_spread":0.2547641118518969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125352381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027000265,0.037015088,0.002633642,0.8119639,0.0034244028,0.000065924236,0.0002856257,0.00005969645,0.11755144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69077444,0.012083056,0.0021663024,0.20786655,0.0022547108,0.000072080045,0.000094414325,0.00022500742,0.08446337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897378,0.0027342848,0.00022399086,0.0014150976,0.0029971974,0.0028916125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987901,0.005133069,0.0004731651,0.00047487026,0.0046169497,0.0014009955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011397216,0.0005383531,0.0010528017,0.0022237126,0.04173919,0.023329291,0.004130489,0.016498834,0.005469119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025140995,0.0007988487,0.0005644215,0.0036875287,0.053697966,0.009586267,0.0039548306,0.022395238,0.0004289508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021059686,0.000018932122,0.0009829778,0.00003624615,0.000013330857,0.000115787436,0.0120621,0.00017981458,0.00008845818,0.8033575,0.1738826,0.009241196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000692743,0.000017067581,0.008130263,0.0009336387,0.00008921544,0.00012645124,0.03541718,0.0006094462,0.00065200025,0.2656064,0.6881005,0.00024842672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087282196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087282196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19207707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6332796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125352928","doi":"","title":"The Problem of 'Relevance': Intelligence to Evidence Lessons from UK Terrorism Prosecutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Criminal justice; Human rights; Relevance (law); Dilemma; Legislature; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04208206344052312,"score_gpt":0.2877412551848344,"score_spread":0.24565919174431128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125352928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03639651,0.040861137,0.0019033485,0.83316493,0.002254676,0.00015991325,0.0004469293,0.000046296907,0.08476628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7686179,0.060002994,0.0055403085,0.14805721,0.0019412391,0.00019284314,0.0005413461,0.00019640205,0.014909814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8769883,0.055316467,0.009100164,0.0059585874,0.041741453,0.010895034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.50790155,0.30703908,0.010720967,0.015323502,0.14244767,0.016567258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078009404,0.0006149316,0.0016086486,0.007905298,0.019541705,0.028232314,0.005965452,0.011647411,0.0044557196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39175642,0.0012745964,0.00085476896,0.00935354,0.03286341,0.012628533,0.009985828,0.020286594,0.0009313045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005999157,0.00010275785,0.018687015,0.0028105322,0.00024527774,0.0034026322,0.10034423,0.0015410687,0.00036368892,0.30713326,0.29620126,0.26856828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036730952,0.000190388,0.040510714,0.013353342,0.00052416686,0.0017638636,0.09984122,0.0011429368,0.0011956845,0.090469934,0.75008905,0.0005513348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94386905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94386905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14419071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23108509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125516008","doi":"10.7202/1073845ar","title":"L’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels au Québec : la loi exclut-elle les victimes de violences sexuelles ou conjugales ?","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04135098196270157,"score_gpt":0.290767640459992,"score_spread":0.24941665849729042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125516008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6929165,0.011241459,0.003094317,0.063859686,0.0006514287,0.00018141179,0.00028712986,0.00002930008,0.22773872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229757,0.0049873036,0.00065533986,0.0047111763,0.00009282853,0.00005194714,0.00007976163,0.000014627372,0.06643128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837625,0.00037253345,0.000041971573,0.00015030942,0.00040748232,0.0006514006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980743,0.00027637958,0.00033305897,0.00009038354,0.0007732496,0.0004526432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012118274,0.00027034793,0.00029188665,0.0008509961,0.011339428,0.003812391,0.0010926224,0.0018147202,0.010738677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037633625,0.00020522652,0.00022281689,0.0010515698,0.0050729923,0.0014117608,0.0017869557,0.0026942038,0.0005238014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018379728,0.00024123871,0.23263766,0.0007281395,0.00012048225,0.0033522332,0.32228327,0.00071667274,0.0035430961,0.22474313,0.045278136,0.16617224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002704176,0.00016104443,0.35182136,0.0013129049,0.00010028231,0.0009702098,0.30155653,0.0008805801,0.0013408152,0.0067938943,0.33491102,0.00012440822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9437029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056297123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02565737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031017093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18615812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125517748","doi":"10.36348/sijlcj.2020.v03i09.007","title":"Transplanting Legal Context without the Law: Double Criminality in Meng Wanzhou’s Extradition Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transplanting; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11482981634586617,"score_gpt":0.3852039120817417,"score_spread":0.27037409573587556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125517748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93523633,0.0008135564,0.0011546263,0.008344656,0.00014985164,0.000051604038,0.000017512908,0.000012596233,0.054219205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954085,0.0002135644,0.00026137676,0.00086263753,0.000018499728,0.00001005622,0.0000068897625,0.000002229867,0.0032161681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833363,0.0003867889,0.00009389284,0.00029872995,0.00032318375,0.00056374946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922526,0.00029270767,0.00011886625,0.00007399595,0.000067945,0.00022122356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012965457,0.00032132748,0.00045707318,0.0011095712,0.012361467,0.0030123778,0.0011521841,0.0035801136,0.0025133588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028930812,0.00026248296,0.00038690123,0.0010245821,0.009182876,0.002106105,0.003747435,0.0053365114,0.00009170267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075450116,0.00014599727,0.037807982,0.00014528751,0.000034309818,0.11463024,0.13981546,0.0008768587,0.0023028858,0.6670266,0.0043463744,0.032792516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001425771,0.00048093006,0.13712615,0.00095996,0.00026076133,0.10223692,0.35849458,0.0041478793,0.0073269084,0.1480627,0.24032165,0.00043906932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08805304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22914056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08805304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011223364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065885955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17508101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125659810","doi":"","title":"Canadian Fundamental Justice and American Due Process: Two Models for a Guarantee of Basic Adjudicative Fairness","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Political science; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Politics; Law; Human rights; Economic Justice; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04156798825757578,"score_gpt":0.3523028877556587,"score_spread":0.3107348994980829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125659810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041733596,0.00533917,0.044319056,0.060557816,0.00083419477,0.00012551012,0.0004148659,0.00011224259,0.8465635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92158383,0.0029495526,0.015215066,0.0063707847,0.00030961525,0.00012258608,0.00016032916,0.0000623928,0.053225894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905607,0.0015527029,0.00020963488,0.0012239917,0.0041877064,0.0022652769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99393797,0.0018475009,0.00038298362,0.0007443196,0.0024238848,0.0006634146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071656685,0.00058601476,0.00088604586,0.0026255096,0.013129572,0.008392639,0.002778613,0.004907289,0.007468164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022147141,0.0005149502,0.0008189315,0.0028407127,0.020541297,0.0067443443,0.0035439124,0.0071552983,0.00053051306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032688279,0.0000016139118,0.000059587543,0.0000035623295,0.0000010176864,0.000005358799,0.00023600325,0.00015044647,0.0000117350155,0.997664,0.00072934385,0.0011340526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004489399,0.000011388082,0.0013910747,0.00007630835,0.0000198732,0.000039519862,0.00034237016,0.0027473485,0.0001055728,0.931748,0.063427605,0.000045983128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9053437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9073099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91091603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.089083984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08082369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6463525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125722114","doi":"","title":"The War on Terror: Constitutional Governance in a State of Permanent Warfare","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislature; Principal (computer security); Legislation; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Corporate governance; War on terror; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.024151158854916404,"score_gpt":0.2930094908237304,"score_spread":0.268858331968814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125722114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2479305,0.007430169,0.017255565,0.09747624,0.00042350707,0.00019267247,0.00030226045,0.000109191315,0.62887996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877439,0.00088473543,0.0009273535,0.0018196838,0.00005663249,0.000020938822,0.00003215143,0.000008355045,0.008506081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705637,0.0007286488,0.000066651,0.00029684868,0.00083944097,0.001011921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666363,0.0013785333,0.0003850745,0.00029993677,0.0007748285,0.000498031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004499236,0.00016843516,0.00021123563,0.0010902097,0.008458015,0.011020106,0.000903235,0.0021020554,0.0038317994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007630535,0.00025336596,0.00017249557,0.0012160387,0.030683443,0.0030678397,0.0033180807,0.0035245437,0.00016387047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000947852,0.000007745961,0.0014221414,0.000019729854,0.000005203865,0.00006438666,0.0027184258,0.0006002066,0.00016351671,0.98530257,0.0033346293,0.006352018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003745883,0.00005753141,0.021813795,0.00033174804,0.00004174887,0.000091885675,0.019579269,0.0016449358,0.0010166467,0.60233104,0.35299626,0.000057626297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60664296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74606645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60664296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027245143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05769988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7913472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125735005","doi":"","title":"Threading the Needle: Structural Reform & Canada’s Intelligence-to-Evidence Dilemma","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Political science; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Terrorism; Confidentiality; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05164387273702871,"score_gpt":0.313018193409592,"score_spread":0.26137432067256333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125735005","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052480116,0.0068685287,0.019794775,0.46792,0.0015083574,0.000806028,0.00087556156,0.00026054622,0.449486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85234976,0.003017158,0.014216811,0.06380429,0.0007273088,0.0004514103,0.00024455125,0.000122008,0.06506672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684595,0.0060082674,0.00086425827,0.0037774763,0.013769874,0.0071206377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595687,0.012763993,0.0017177458,0.0032062228,0.017906085,0.004837246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018608535,0.00059305463,0.0009389437,0.0038098723,0.030975012,0.018869188,0.0046479814,0.010593964,0.0097126765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05626024,0.00081208063,0.0010318451,0.0047123358,0.030057225,0.006231575,0.007773799,0.010913259,0.0005432229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017991691,0.000012554811,0.00088721147,0.00005504717,0.00001582369,0.00013776676,0.002085862,0.00082702056,0.000117040516,0.96393436,0.020698754,0.011210587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017528789,0.000054964436,0.007773203,0.0005148888,0.00012347977,0.00017493784,0.005496082,0.004137905,0.00064420915,0.44604346,0.5346107,0.00025088555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19039391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19039391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3391783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312586974","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2355875","title":"The Influence of Freedom of Speech on Tort Law: Where to Draw the Line?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Line (geometry); Law; Free speech; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Liability","score_opus":0.015697633133082596,"score_gpt":0.31127349222217293,"score_spread":0.29557585908909034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312586974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1796883,0.059843004,0.0041951537,0.57597953,0.0017295803,0.00003681335,0.00091173,0.0000424829,0.1775734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551509,0.017376773,0.00057590404,0.018858504,0.005027464,0.00002256628,0.00008250114,0.00006211634,0.0028432696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891629,0.006082263,0.0004017116,0.0010677936,0.0019575742,0.0013277176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7377961,0.23507047,0.011550943,0.005076638,0.0062600886,0.004245719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016627254,0.00045572929,0.001865838,0.0023561453,0.0030220267,0.009725127,0.0024010101,0.0072530373,0.026839923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09818001,0.0005673311,0.0013033448,0.0025559827,0.024986366,0.018896034,0.004537846,0.011120912,0.0014409415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085179973,0.0004456708,0.034387473,0.0007235111,0.000590659,0.0008471163,0.005486343,0.0011386244,0.00055527454,0.8553561,0.029720403,0.06989701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020854395,0.0001954573,0.0719122,0.0016051788,0.0005916805,0.00027618892,0.006460329,0.0014847183,0.00068517774,0.86715305,0.04925347,0.00017397765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01062217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015068912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026839923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002452005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003951997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08978844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125875054","doi":"","title":"Calling on U.S. Courts to Adopt Canada's Unified Approach to Statutory Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Legislative history; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Law; Legislature; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02019172881396807,"score_gpt":0.32368522083580364,"score_spread":0.30349349202183556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125875054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02730623,0.014714954,0.028864184,0.4229881,0.005069771,0.0005256222,0.001928359,0.0008327485,0.49777004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5961803,0.007768533,0.042060856,0.18161833,0.001380944,0.00031351586,0.00074431294,0.00021672643,0.16971639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808977,0.0025052624,0.0008077335,0.0018578774,0.010978567,0.0029527945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541945,0.0022241853,0.0006194006,0.00067801937,0.009976714,0.0010821796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008163044,0.0005602292,0.0004848708,0.0025198297,0.013302328,0.014888653,0.00370325,0.010128886,0.0050209784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012097809,0.00056813547,0.0010537449,0.0040659434,0.015858298,0.003950785,0.0034285919,0.01142836,0.000799864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007206952,0.000011960612,0.0011073648,0.0000682514,0.000007881731,0.00015463082,0.0018842786,0.00041631458,0.0002584834,0.92039776,0.061534878,0.014151125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040166986,0.00004826036,0.0073384987,0.0010221328,0.0000714237,0.00020740448,0.0038332432,0.0034689766,0.0011647153,0.18008104,0.8024398,0.00028434672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9579326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9727897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09143256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09143256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2249801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6633927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125890649","doi":"","title":"Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor's Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminal justice; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Obligation; Bargaining power; Sociology","score_opus":0.027514980794915444,"score_gpt":0.34808984295665424,"score_spread":0.3205748621617388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125890649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22218113,0.0061774594,0.03685272,0.13307142,0.0006615609,0.0003087207,0.00005902279,0.00011225965,0.6005757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734928,0.0010066216,0.005650243,0.0062868637,0.00015202558,0.00004426821,0.000012015601,0.00003178919,0.0133232465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737263,0.011060343,0.00088147196,0.0015075713,0.0068108505,0.006013542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844626,0.009256247,0.0012153597,0.0009274671,0.0024687184,0.0016695705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022544973,0.0003930913,0.0005105705,0.0014178785,0.0211221,0.014595232,0.0020504734,0.008017805,0.004570494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066066444,0.00052705326,0.00044788377,0.0012221821,0.022683894,0.006333454,0.00718976,0.009101115,0.0006482626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008481896,0.00006718837,0.008183475,0.00008926584,0.000025902413,0.0024742929,0.06269177,0.00093825033,0.0015724391,0.8564301,0.011873701,0.055568796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073671246,0.000108772554,0.046037044,0.0010787345,0.00011117886,0.00238023,0.10297953,0.0057530557,0.0029913653,0.5943212,0.24381188,0.00035344495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2612221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4955168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2612221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02449698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05600822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5194032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125891016","doi":"","title":"Search and Seizure in 2004 - Dialogue or Dead-End?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Discretion; Supreme court; Law; Suspect; Political science; Constitution; Power (physics); Judicial review; Prerogative; Judicial discretion; Politics","score_opus":0.04029662111072017,"score_gpt":0.326380885851404,"score_spread":0.2860842647406838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125891016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035991278,0.0077416184,0.004749739,0.22906044,0.002297032,0.00006586371,0.00038416145,0.00029780605,0.7194122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6474983,0.0026839885,0.00085686654,0.07320726,0.0006000679,0.000083571984,0.00029207626,0.00026559172,0.27451232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295056,0.002313341,0.00032570385,0.00069880014,0.0014329274,0.002278545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967327,0.0015687153,0.00023820013,0.000310176,0.00066082267,0.000489278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004628358,0.00031463767,0.00062941684,0.0013971878,0.014095963,0.012534416,0.0017810287,0.009652792,0.014992247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0160602,0.0002824668,0.00040281515,0.0016140867,0.009271385,0.011627468,0.006045149,0.00796551,0.0026553655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004233219,0.000024706258,0.0010204806,0.000057128596,0.000006661259,0.00064732315,0.030782059,0.00015548013,0.00012566225,0.7916348,0.13723975,0.038263615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012674139,0.000025796622,0.0011719672,0.00022206447,0.000009366925,0.00029128257,0.031874955,0.000301788,0.00037833655,0.09446397,0.8712068,0.000040944466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17797415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24868557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17797415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01593579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02026727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35387647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125934396","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Sentencing Regime for Murder","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Compromise; Flexibility (engineering); Position (finance); Homicide; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Economics; Human factors and ergonomics; Management","score_opus":0.05356430709796579,"score_gpt":0.32074137411145476,"score_spread":0.267177067013489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125934396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39241138,0.020811016,0.06614458,0.24894743,0.00830197,0.0019369494,0.000944042,0.0015006555,0.25900194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8671429,0.0048855506,0.042441726,0.044046097,0.0028830525,0.0007592865,0.00026396936,0.0003534986,0.037223987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95377886,0.009805681,0.003914584,0.003129592,0.022047723,0.007323574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96512866,0.016596518,0.0024689822,0.0018693096,0.012128448,0.0018080402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031755462,0.0004158209,0.0008176792,0.0053235656,0.012317581,0.0081556775,0.00571795,0.0064966697,0.0023814135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070657946,0.0011596256,0.0005882285,0.0017243475,0.008954688,0.0036103688,0.004404121,0.012349708,0.001049419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022152692,0.0002807073,0.01690027,0.00063482847,0.000091557726,0.0012545546,0.03215049,0.0029382668,0.010258523,0.6262672,0.082000144,0.22700195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030554304,0.0009959,0.11783899,0.0031354097,0.00042044197,0.0011363208,0.02224021,0.010334382,0.009781644,0.08532373,0.7474328,0.0010545694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47962442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67491794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47962442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031332824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054374352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9536654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126026167","doi":"10.29173/alr169","title":"The Administration of Justice? Certificate Proceedings, Charkaoui II, and the Value of Disclosure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Agency (philosophy); Certificate; Terrorism; Public administration; Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); National security; Political science; United States National Security Agency; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Law; Public relations; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04608611807496349,"score_gpt":0.34024097622189636,"score_spread":0.2941548581469329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126026167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02628076,0.012377051,0.0032702861,0.24492304,0.0011087862,0.000083503386,0.0001045882,0.0000838662,0.7117681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87662715,0.0060301917,0.0010379071,0.04308471,0.0012390378,0.000083650404,0.00004528513,0.000054542314,0.0717975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97910875,0.0072920877,0.00070344575,0.0014634186,0.005976766,0.0054554953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615027,0.021835705,0.00407805,0.002565933,0.0068098013,0.003207814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019774226,0.00024040781,0.00056951965,0.0021135279,0.0107772695,0.020307802,0.0026664448,0.0102093965,0.0071665263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063267775,0.0003612915,0.0003576599,0.0024950122,0.022684729,0.007924172,0.0053330553,0.010826958,0.0011693498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011939994,0.0000137480265,0.00075739983,0.000032185053,0.0000041855164,0.000104820494,0.0015243585,0.000080217884,0.00002711872,0.9646145,0.019746853,0.013082535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057261113,0.0000831288,0.0064262534,0.000999797,0.000055386437,0.0005699734,0.008628728,0.0006107951,0.0006834601,0.4417577,0.5400249,0.0001026072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11199938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13330398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11199938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017545054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044117305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.222695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126101507","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0041","title":"Comparative Criminal Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Principle of legality; Comparative law; Section (typography); Political science; Criminal procedure; Parochialism; Public law; Context (archaeology); Criminal jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.13926402087759937,"score_gpt":0.39691443517097774,"score_spread":0.25765041429337837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126101507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031551458,0.023789233,0.005128054,0.0073192143,0.00044543872,0.00003029607,0.00013816272,0.00003123417,0.95996326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65647435,0.07273621,0.019292671,0.009772692,0.002921088,0.00044606245,0.0012194046,0.00017545909,0.23696212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783534,0.0012110836,0.0000679563,0.0002287492,0.0005320844,0.00012484424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982419,0.0011395116,0.00009495123,0.00020378409,0.00024129993,0.00007848646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016338185,0.0003608815,0.000495166,0.00408098,0.0040734326,0.0038643766,0.00073425024,0.0018095553,0.03128877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047503775,0.00016513141,0.0002555979,0.004525892,0.007128337,0.004936957,0.0020978006,0.0019628932,0.0022922636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015952653,0.000006215431,0.00010962426,0.000048039867,0.0000011224008,0.000022668872,0.00074625225,0.000042322845,0.000016869499,0.9716806,0.011383075,0.015941555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020376613,0.00001617552,0.0009279019,0.00029494314,0.0000023098823,0.0002643388,0.0013270809,0.0001245519,0.000065337095,0.40038925,0.59658056,0.0000054998336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032128948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048948657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03128877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003730506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015712985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10467136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126114360","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1074","title":"Police Independence and the Military Police","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Parliament; Charter; Political science; Military justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal code; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05197959954786438,"score_gpt":0.3026798840666218,"score_spread":0.25070028451875737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126114360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15021311,0.019166838,0.002405856,0.089007765,0.000746225,0.000040768584,0.00012362484,0.000024840137,0.738271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96158653,0.008815379,0.0005242071,0.0053403075,0.0005549823,0.000028203021,0.00006190158,0.00001479867,0.023073666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472743,0.0009993126,0.00013449292,0.00022960528,0.0019912692,0.0019179174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456763,0.0019439954,0.0010117053,0.00022822285,0.0013054479,0.00094297115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020662132,0.00020835777,0.00025384908,0.00280583,0.010588427,0.0039664614,0.00075812585,0.0016259644,0.0056966734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00951097,0.00037754737,0.0003468445,0.00192446,0.014110774,0.00403293,0.005597866,0.004551682,0.00053122453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046162,0.00005708341,0.014267254,0.00008672479,0.000014908632,0.0008498888,0.016836615,0.00030630562,0.00023708661,0.90660006,0.016850004,0.04384797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049166792,0.00010935503,0.15166287,0.001600587,0.000051738534,0.0015924558,0.0460699,0.0005447861,0.00075766654,0.17154281,0.6259033,0.00011533968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22492453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2931781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22492453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010909451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023179287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44723064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126805376","doi":"","title":"A Study on the Canadian Criminal Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of Comparative Criminal Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17513455031260405,"score_gpt":0.39294682322198965,"score_spread":0.2178122729093856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126805376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93145674,0.0023585053,0.0001537717,0.0035212527,0.00006256856,0.00015145527,0.0010132594,0.000006812281,0.06127568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532516,0.002045161,0.0002309556,0.0008944559,0.000017386164,0.000050575472,0.00041045187,0.000009660546,0.011016163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737096,0.0004301914,0.0000691306,0.0002872451,0.0008511911,0.0009913543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325985,0.0013600165,0.0005003594,0.00017478142,0.0034863304,0.0012185844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002043525,0.0005598376,0.00056576054,0.0068457327,0.02967693,0.0038508447,0.0017051436,0.00127095,0.010098858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100126015,0.0004392331,0.0004926308,0.018464541,0.0044480185,0.0020734968,0.0026246107,0.0021885317,0.0003552296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029924995,0.0007372104,0.42779455,0.00052661763,0.000107404936,0.0041058874,0.33757162,0.00041646944,0.0010336625,0.10384033,0.041962303,0.08160476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003274489,0.00014182908,0.56605744,0.00048300953,0.0001156838,0.00068220997,0.31168365,0.00039876456,0.00038804853,0.0015407262,0.11837447,0.000101357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99707866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12572555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12572555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15559945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128056352","doi":"","title":"Foundations of Criminal and Civil Law in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Criminology; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.03902490765349789,"score_gpt":0.30102886521849276,"score_spread":0.26200395756499484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128056352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007083257,0.024583055,0.0054401513,0.044461444,0.00064581924,0.00008737872,0.0006088623,0.00009109462,0.9169989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4372624,0.042674962,0.009462513,0.0055972417,0.000607099,0.00013446665,0.00046285772,0.00016602325,0.5036325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984909,0.0002160497,0.000037889542,0.0001304831,0.00075320055,0.00037148493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973501,0.00069355493,0.00007567551,0.00010520661,0.0014238873,0.00035167197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011785036,0.00056793704,0.00058415916,0.0038769706,0.009965159,0.012442474,0.0019455936,0.0029132403,0.014462607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005247265,0.0007039245,0.00038656796,0.006104776,0.012435696,0.0030733268,0.0016073319,0.0040330486,0.000850554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033262854,0.0000071070194,0.00025497656,0.00002097355,0.0000037510308,0.000042795997,0.0006184092,0.0006542463,0.00001547,0.9524037,0.03496658,0.011008588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000956945,0.0000046961086,0.00243612,0.00023864154,0.000016407108,0.000080191145,0.001542878,0.002426458,0.00008627492,0.5716212,0.42150447,0.000033072953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15820897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15820897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22416063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9763583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128715866","doi":"","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms = Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis Butterworths eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Law","score_opus":0.019654060815114675,"score_gpt":0.2687384684076379,"score_spread":0.2490844075925232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128715866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008267061,0.015096565,0.000843288,0.009145089,0.0024004814,0.00012930676,0.0038489078,0.00015692682,0.9675528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021585342,0.013197177,0.0026892612,0.0035922122,0.0005214079,0.00017285655,0.0017189578,0.00017928494,0.95634335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996527,0.0001858401,0.00009397355,0.00029162565,0.0022871979,0.00061436964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863476,0.00015211974,0.000064322965,0.000105278355,0.0008654227,0.00017802347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015647642,0.0011979304,0.0009246053,0.0049893926,0.0088391295,0.010490096,0.0016343473,0.004050364,0.060976923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031191823,0.0009002361,0.00061131176,0.00872415,0.004957804,0.0028674884,0.0013789842,0.007370663,0.007636668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072307053,0.000007545012,0.000117596464,0.000063703046,0.0000030585916,0.000020560485,0.00027450424,0.00012145105,0.00003202903,0.3614552,0.6217577,0.016139355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044011517,0.0000017959987,0.00064085604,0.00007881513,0.0000023441044,0.000022283511,0.00009631872,0.000037396774,0.000032608,0.008395382,0.9906737,0.000014105583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97089237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9820448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060976923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060891487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1336679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4418007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130270817","doi":"10.29173/mlj1013","title":"An Analysis of Third Party Record Applications Under the Mills Scheme, 2012-2017: The Right to Full Answer and Defence versus Rights to Privacy and Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); The Right to Privacy; Right to privacy; Plaintiff; Deliberation; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.06267139408840833,"score_gpt":0.3646206850977449,"score_spread":0.3019492910093366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130270817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9095937,0.0017601748,0.00061341637,0.0063767093,0.000050550665,0.00023627713,0.0008946547,0.000013995813,0.080460586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97789896,0.0019383947,0.0003788819,0.0013917943,0.000057087404,0.00009690855,0.00044858013,0.000011957738,0.01777734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858995,0.0012806387,0.0007156033,0.00069989945,0.008504801,0.002899487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97421426,0.009648989,0.0063424343,0.0010195776,0.0076566185,0.001118231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071887868,0.00018687305,0.00042703998,0.0046687042,0.0061689713,0.0045996257,0.0011654411,0.0018226643,0.0018936421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031071585,0.00044138625,0.00042824456,0.008270089,0.0061940025,0.0017411925,0.0031113946,0.0025987085,0.00024761245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006061357,0.00020799822,0.49089253,0.0006971518,0.0001186751,0.0071739545,0.1642242,0.001049269,0.004936828,0.22326423,0.02283978,0.0839893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042720643,0.00014017046,0.8086423,0.0005180102,0.00016660044,0.0011515329,0.07976231,0.001085075,0.003224997,0.004685948,0.10047283,0.000107505424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77806526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9022245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22193474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036334082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04153478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4464835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132978165","doi":"","title":"Collaboration with Justice in the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Canada: A comparative study on the provision of undertakings to offenders who are willing to give evidence in the prosecution of others","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Order (exchange); Law; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.17927932165641292,"score_gpt":0.39807744608146367,"score_spread":0.21879812442505076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132978165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98269755,0.0015622968,0.00008125781,0.0017564689,0.000033106702,0.00010432266,0.00031200168,0.0000032495711,0.0134497555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945286,0.0015706219,0.0002512789,0.0004910797,0.0000072028142,0.00006845229,0.00027712734,0.000008925234,0.0027966471],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99099827,0.0021298267,0.000490173,0.00077121507,0.0022399162,0.003370642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98825383,0.0031741576,0.0022131219,0.00043452132,0.00326637,0.0026579723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005433474,0.0003889455,0.0008239995,0.0031387676,0.009238816,0.0071366406,0.0019845106,0.0013432826,0.0026364417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019850882,0.0005572413,0.0003830235,0.009626698,0.006794603,0.0029192998,0.0055492115,0.001612041,0.00018568568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036097685,0.0004862758,0.19117291,0.00072366185,0.00017497783,0.0035531926,0.7191892,0.00042961945,0.00044499466,0.022564022,0.008203796,0.052696317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032019667,0.00005861772,0.19234483,0.0005987206,0.00004525041,0.00024388227,0.7860888,0.00020456784,0.00013578366,0.00029722464,0.019876448,0.00007376637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09277688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09277688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13146979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6731465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134350734","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1416","title":"Ending the Erasure?: Writing Race into the Story of Psychological Detentions – Examining R. v. Le","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Construct (python library); Race (biology); Supreme court; Law enforcement; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Ethnic group; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.14484145803454884,"score_gpt":0.4063267709386004,"score_spread":0.2614853129040516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134350734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027823122,0.01754277,0.0006890943,0.8789943,0.0017768213,0.000020721433,0.00003343248,0.000014828641,0.07310488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6360819,0.015814513,0.00052206946,0.31511915,0.0032784224,0.00012275386,0.000030632353,0.00009199777,0.028938642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98456824,0.011165835,0.00024531604,0.00092298945,0.00086717255,0.002230479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832392,0.013053233,0.0009859592,0.0003636491,0.0008203597,0.0015375768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013363035,0.00043680504,0.0006966973,0.0009880827,0.027878525,0.0122725405,0.0022377733,0.019814922,0.0030251804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033358004,0.0005017065,0.00070398755,0.0008684373,0.027032847,0.0133696515,0.0051087174,0.03396785,0.00059894245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010356361,0.00009047687,0.0016962757,0.0001785389,0.000030451014,0.0031705187,0.3208634,0.0001293014,0.0002714789,0.47113878,0.17973378,0.02259348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048137823,0.00010338019,0.002631514,0.0014671731,0.000033203552,0.0010323522,0.29857165,0.00020817059,0.00037944087,0.08327704,0.61216587,0.00008205835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043282483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06743946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00939078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010383957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08606112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134415273","doi":"","title":"Entrapment Minimalism: Shedding the 'No Reasonable Suspicion or Bona Fide Inquiry' Test","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Misconduct; Commit; Reasonable suspicion; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminology; Commission; Warrant; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07210370149154356,"score_gpt":0.37605115872123984,"score_spread":0.3039474572296963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134415273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09117166,0.0038252056,0.13960567,0.17232701,0.0015225181,0.00040607413,0.00050651387,0.0003637898,0.5902716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412364,0.0005497158,0.02158377,0.019553553,0.00064323103,0.0003884696,0.00014242729,0.00012228536,0.015780121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97658664,0.008594814,0.0011910847,0.004506069,0.0068900194,0.0022314168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674503,0.021598795,0.0013344301,0.0039874753,0.00409838,0.0015306277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023886368,0.0004939853,0.0015879491,0.0017653031,0.007599167,0.00846578,0.0049083256,0.008119104,0.0049532545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061634235,0.0007932928,0.0017052265,0.0008549482,0.041987676,0.014091377,0.009845402,0.01552527,0.00085904106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015939235,0.0000063944462,0.0001595914,0.000015237794,0.0000044435997,0.00006386161,0.00036179673,0.00008400184,0.00003958408,0.996633,0.0010691269,0.00154695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024225845,0.000014450415,0.00023953232,0.0000551196,0.000012897158,0.00006602636,0.000251412,0.0007181623,0.0001907041,0.98823977,0.010170866,0.000016819427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02548692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026707027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02548692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011208546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01841801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12632471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135497003","doi":"10.29173/mlj1001","title":"Voluntary Intoxication and the Charter: Revisiting the Constitutionality of Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Mens rea; Political science; Jurisdiction; Criminal code; Legislation; Section (typography); Prerogative; Criminal law; Politics; Business","score_opus":0.0529956871023922,"score_gpt":0.3291084618731677,"score_spread":0.2761127747707755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135497003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2865393,0.011389823,0.015619586,0.3296744,0.0047371797,0.00033565005,0.0005405645,0.00012628322,0.3510373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228116,0.003296284,0.005502952,0.03948904,0.0011298304,0.0001338903,0.00011221294,0.00004720583,0.027477117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152476,0.0025962824,0.00037021516,0.00081093493,0.0026950082,0.0020027591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980287,0.011048028,0.0014278775,0.0010864615,0.005151659,0.000998927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012813051,0.00038297146,0.00048996287,0.0016035684,0.0121071525,0.015543343,0.0027143129,0.011354004,0.0015504477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023969138,0.0005518287,0.0005218454,0.0021399485,0.02243012,0.0052954913,0.0029875038,0.015210576,0.00028480156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019652234,0.000020956697,0.001796909,0.000032263353,0.000004589959,0.00027120253,0.007240725,0.00046781413,0.00042112407,0.9746771,0.008665071,0.006382752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011723723,0.0002468043,0.034668252,0.0017964841,0.00014847534,0.0004704244,0.026119564,0.006176236,0.004159333,0.44223517,0.4834022,0.00045980624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65808034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80022115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65808034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029532017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101576544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68786657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137533241","doi":"","title":"Enjoy the Silence: Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Silence; Political science; Cornerstone; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01988925066666814,"score_gpt":0.26936745252033734,"score_spread":0.2494782018536692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137533241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40979007,0.024262492,0.008005527,0.13149476,0.0017657137,0.00021434782,0.00046087935,0.00018044785,0.42382574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939242,0.005166909,0.00081653654,0.023666002,0.00020318643,0.00002996608,0.000110491615,0.000070181595,0.03069473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98507774,0.0024631838,0.0002833999,0.001057174,0.0077575394,0.0033609201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741014,0.013124928,0.0009761997,0.0006036942,0.009793576,0.0014000669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008833062,0.00032844552,0.00056362886,0.0016992335,0.03136578,0.013629557,0.0026861415,0.0068626986,0.003332191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035144083,0.00040639794,0.00046368432,0.0037350652,0.014345044,0.003944283,0.0028009575,0.010294275,0.00041894524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009057392,0.00006261069,0.0117736375,0.00030164456,0.000045937413,0.0054948987,0.17548259,0.00072552066,0.001833782,0.60784113,0.11451678,0.08183082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003083493,0.00007817872,0.036452852,0.0014573699,0.00018139466,0.00085677917,0.13101614,0.001911288,0.0032479605,0.046181317,0.7782925,0.00029337255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96114707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07806092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07806092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11918983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56637424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138576700","doi":"10.29173/alr2650","title":"Private Records, Sexual Activity Evidence, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Legislation; Notice; Possession (linguistics); Right to counsel; Charter; Constitution; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.04353705924492598,"score_gpt":0.3305260008523696,"score_spread":0.28698894160744365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138576700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055806335,0.0069842925,0.014690852,0.11133926,0.0010177195,0.00010044868,0.0003333693,0.00005717643,0.8096705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94598913,0.0035237768,0.003664632,0.0076110745,0.0010905657,0.00012504323,0.00012584715,0.000036317506,0.03783355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833717,0.007420535,0.00080981053,0.0011718769,0.0049216826,0.0023044178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734672,0.019527223,0.0017021184,0.0027821916,0.0016980813,0.00082316285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013401497,0.00030406663,0.0005087546,0.002217609,0.007505397,0.015438158,0.0020012883,0.007971442,0.007576073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028939135,0.00050211244,0.00047997758,0.0019625907,0.04479944,0.01327628,0.007995755,0.010936745,0.0006925265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046493114,0.0000036180086,0.00010716877,0.000010996762,8.1662296e-7,0.000038882605,0.00060541666,0.00004504508,0.000017002696,0.9955297,0.0012262277,0.0024105813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028531535,0.000030313671,0.0013149362,0.0004335269,0.000014274905,0.00018996613,0.0020113066,0.0004266423,0.00052491465,0.8894794,0.10550478,0.000041301202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020989604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023645854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020989604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061135776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010055273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07087469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139652525","doi":"10.29173/mlj993","title":"Jackpot: The Hang-up Holding Back the Residual Category of Abuse of Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Misconduct; Redress; Law; Substantive due process; Political science; Due process; Criminology; Sociology; Common law","score_opus":0.08971413420176451,"score_gpt":0.35842435941035067,"score_spread":0.2687102252085862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139652525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41017315,0.005484859,0.044834405,0.06679325,0.0013190906,0.00018470848,0.00013587181,0.00019888424,0.4708758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97884995,0.0005990688,0.0018293068,0.006886566,0.00014068349,0.000035394765,0.000019143274,0.00003251304,0.011607319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232554,0.0026605905,0.00029392153,0.0011232188,0.002198767,0.001397983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952148,0.0022925327,0.00064168836,0.0008564469,0.00063194847,0.00036254665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051349467,0.00028243716,0.00041817073,0.0009851111,0.0061773676,0.0069783893,0.0013931991,0.004102467,0.0024983138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014310262,0.00030115622,0.0006414965,0.000691248,0.025617527,0.0070367036,0.006563463,0.0064581544,0.00030281657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050295886,0.0000106044345,0.001780354,0.000048243775,0.000007975524,0.00062405627,0.009809693,0.00009374875,0.00048454612,0.97065836,0.0032980728,0.013134032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006665845,0.0004075537,0.012874825,0.0010281244,0.00016137157,0.0025322821,0.04241781,0.002212345,0.0044972864,0.7175615,0.21609999,0.00014035776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01922025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023850137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01922025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033874998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007862437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03821677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140234991","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198843566.003.0018","title":"The Crown Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Medicine; Archaeology; Orthodontics","score_opus":0.04999217319125858,"score_gpt":0.31826803621067995,"score_spread":0.26827586301942136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140234991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065125636,0.0052877706,0.0004152343,0.003936302,0.0006677366,0.000010431554,0.0000732239,0.000022705544,0.9889354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049723517,0.0043722256,0.00054338755,0.0042809034,0.00065177254,0.000021745984,0.00012242695,0.00004318449,0.940241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917465,0.000110151166,0.000021424601,0.00013091032,0.00043845605,0.00012437963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999529,0.00012129969,0.000017237917,0.000045848254,0.00020611352,0.00008042553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049352384,0.0003122956,0.00021669525,0.001117128,0.003146383,0.0050031887,0.00073388714,0.0022790865,0.042639002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015230408,0.00020211941,0.0002101412,0.0008867984,0.0023909563,0.0024844124,0.0016459533,0.0036204054,0.007521505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027924905,0.000005405388,0.000048291044,0.000019772919,6.9374624e-7,0.00006415694,0.00037700153,0.000051777308,0.00010648653,0.84224224,0.14080937,0.01627201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016188261,0.0000025818144,0.00013555786,0.00007914375,0.0000013552462,0.000051444298,0.00013196067,0.000086786225,0.00008743429,0.03516493,0.9642544,0.0000027714943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04631111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08102124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04631111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072085834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048348648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1426416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142525426","doi":"","title":"Mr Big: the covert technique that solved the Morcombe case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10877627757390419,"score_gpt":0.33095847412681423,"score_spread":0.22218219655291005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142525426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1238328,0.00999294,0.055372365,0.25432795,0.0089930305,0.0010047371,0.00033330187,0.000514888,0.5456279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6714348,0.003926759,0.080084816,0.05993602,0.0023408502,0.0005331229,0.00010777459,0.00035498472,0.18128075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913045,0.0030492987,0.00023061047,0.0014156491,0.0029950903,0.001004949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99262494,0.0026426043,0.0004903702,0.0015637274,0.0016605502,0.0010178202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008758853,0.00039169792,0.00040456362,0.0012915904,0.010305863,0.0029734278,0.001523362,0.0036035688,0.0075999084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030494165,0.00041457842,0.00041610538,0.0008403695,0.009168704,0.00295535,0.0044112983,0.006691393,0.001010389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013372187,0.00007841748,0.0054103234,0.0002950415,0.000047403748,0.004546415,0.032344542,0.00025546385,0.0022989905,0.5340641,0.22228102,0.1982445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043625827,0.00022764251,0.008129961,0.0007563322,0.0000802851,0.0077532544,0.013408897,0.0008752317,0.0031921933,0.039220978,0.92614937,0.00016221471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16391715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46986106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16391715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061652362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013314475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32592613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148716808","doi":"","title":"Sentencing Acts: Appraisal of court records in Canada and Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029838335325457557,"score_gpt":0.260922209767163,"score_spread":0.23108387444170547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148716808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584883,0.0025833745,0.00024134495,0.001461441,0.00006029931,0.0003486756,0.0025974917,0.000026357518,0.034192756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709887,0.002819725,0.0007618295,0.00023688262,0.000022277045,0.000092433846,0.002020789,0.000025630477,0.023031767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942188,0.0006837793,0.00040572492,0.00034666905,0.0035569468,0.00078811013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679405,0.0038467895,0.0026301474,0.0004566618,0.02296599,0.002159878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026360154,0.00032842925,0.00047856857,0.016511645,0.010276311,0.0048615565,0.002268444,0.0009625908,0.0033050082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027035888,0.00044949792,0.0003293693,0.022467576,0.0022201238,0.0012370434,0.0028889684,0.0011103197,0.00046933116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043023215,0.0002919423,0.4774294,0.0009577195,0.0001395537,0.0053392346,0.29127505,0.0021356603,0.0012111801,0.012663243,0.028486287,0.17964056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008205033,0.000049248654,0.8866324,0.00024867308,0.000035451845,0.00033348595,0.085855566,0.0011863742,0.0002488486,0.00035917578,0.024985377,0.00005726936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08295479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08295479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08029891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6018819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148845190","doi":"","title":"Comparing \"Appels\" and Oranges: Evaluating the Link between Appeal Processes and Judiciary Structures in Canada and France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nothing; Simple (philosophy); Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10820533125378311,"score_gpt":0.37221740506654694,"score_spread":0.2640120738127638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148845190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92990375,0.0019859283,0.0011172483,0.007354263,0.00009025871,0.00021739397,0.0009837248,0.000034796834,0.05831266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99033666,0.00035835008,0.0005345454,0.0008243915,0.000032625238,0.00006897903,0.00041534466,0.000014254909,0.0074149864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858627,0.003624742,0.00039561384,0.00082958466,0.006800006,0.0024873768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95895755,0.015969118,0.0047838823,0.0006746596,0.016527861,0.003086872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009474313,0.00041290477,0.00067452405,0.0050602215,0.007967899,0.008559686,0.0027859148,0.002674439,0.0074077523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045925193,0.00024530914,0.0006926978,0.0054701488,0.0065689525,0.0023315307,0.0030641379,0.0025187607,0.000371461],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012852761,0.0006855581,0.657968,0.0004729929,0.0005744113,0.00088910497,0.06813768,0.010332882,0.0008777776,0.16328803,0.039566558,0.055921827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011371206,0.00045899313,0.76426893,0.00076211797,0.00033765272,0.00010186464,0.13190104,0.01175033,0.00080264785,0.011274605,0.07793171,0.0002964353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99091583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12566338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12566338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06451037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9117559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149021583","doi":"","title":"L’intoxication en contexte suicidaire et les deux sens de l’acte volontaire en droit criminel canadien: une critique de l’arrêt R. c. Turcotte","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Appeal; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01967242660546481,"score_gpt":0.3015155236801193,"score_spread":0.2818430970746545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149021583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013722077,0.02913417,0.0007930418,0.9113839,0.0014343516,0.000014517838,0.000025206924,0.000014844285,0.043477885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64136577,0.026536083,0.0008243984,0.2865212,0.0036413977,0.00007889647,0.000026273565,0.000072635434,0.040933307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930473,0.004566871,0.00013633723,0.00047271868,0.00093837973,0.0008383004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905494,0.005725109,0.00061299326,0.0003063752,0.0018059019,0.0010002108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008656274,0.0006227022,0.00073863164,0.0015100223,0.014305321,0.01104572,0.0028282623,0.013480573,0.00387056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009240924,0.00034963788,0.0005684055,0.0011264735,0.056379873,0.00766111,0.005675292,0.019419203,0.00059424003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004616755,0.000055743745,0.0027236973,0.00030701634,0.000026467787,0.0016740981,0.172566,0.00027765354,0.0001490702,0.6601251,0.13493778,0.027111247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033221146,0.00005746162,0.0058682947,0.0023437478,0.00003463841,0.0009584,0.16734804,0.0007221613,0.00024082996,0.21268739,0.6095766,0.00012927497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35194644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46805036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6480535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028858216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027170368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6997958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150041875","doi":"10.7220/2029-4239.22.3","title":"Kai kurie vagystės kriminalizavimo probleminiai aspektai Lietuvos ir kitų užsienio šalių baudžiamuosiuose įstatymuose","year":2020,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Legislator; Lithuanian; Criminal law; Criminal code; Political science; Law; Legislation","score_opus":0.08537116852398068,"score_gpt":0.3477368655277646,"score_spread":0.2623656970037839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150041875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31941316,0.056072287,0.06796008,0.05271845,0.001696306,0.0003626727,0.00057000783,0.00030893856,0.5008981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87401634,0.032865565,0.027667446,0.0023692583,0.000585723,0.00025783898,0.00048964994,0.00010046059,0.0616477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977562,0.0010496762,0.00019780548,0.0002730046,0.00045350706,0.00026978823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986959,0.0006555371,0.0002524601,0.00011560814,0.00021221332,0.0000682509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018725403,0.00051918114,0.00047719383,0.0021730505,0.0026086161,0.008431922,0.00066535064,0.00092551135,0.00647336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027344443,0.00024402727,0.00029674795,0.0020486864,0.0044044056,0.004395616,0.0034974108,0.0019748323,0.0012455685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008070405,0.00019731173,0.018064588,0.0011668365,0.00009579145,0.0023646585,0.042755045,0.0010738841,0.0018693157,0.68730104,0.016731564,0.22829928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016073753,0.00009423881,0.028938575,0.001982689,0.000079966616,0.0029129356,0.09377672,0.0035049713,0.003741268,0.28433865,0.5805243,0.000089508765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025949108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00466261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008431922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002779718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043765255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02165556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151050510","doi":"","title":"Criminal law and the Canadian criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04248858460950564,"score_gpt":0.2998926238185834,"score_spread":0.25740403920907773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151050510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037072932,0.06163056,0.00086398487,0.10272176,0.0033042536,0.00009017321,0.0042319885,0.00015994051,0.82329005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1463816,0.0820278,0.0033404394,0.02628211,0.0019472648,0.00016674353,0.0026180607,0.00024911715,0.73698694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565303,0.00030196627,0.000092851966,0.00025938562,0.002466165,0.0012265831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936912,0.00096960453,0.00021024887,0.00018397439,0.003807462,0.0011375045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016483803,0.0009781035,0.000633711,0.007806827,0.0170424,0.012741079,0.0024405944,0.0050811437,0.045940977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010256348,0.0008382034,0.00069965544,0.011297145,0.009933623,0.00372519,0.0018393926,0.004905245,0.0034290613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009333326,0.000010042566,0.0007058437,0.000108945394,0.000005651983,0.000056487203,0.001122145,0.00021780384,0.000034003806,0.3259502,0.6456656,0.026114022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048244615,0.000003527165,0.0045171613,0.00031098846,0.000010751692,0.000030551673,0.0013940055,0.00016075076,0.00003385318,0.018512117,0.9749843,0.00003718317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1804558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1804558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37205473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9505551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152564363","doi":"","title":"WCS Canada Comments - Ontario’s Sustainable Bait Management Strategy - November 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.01534385728168926,"score_gpt":0.26941201244527424,"score_spread":0.254068155163585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152564363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002098373,0.0023926834,0.00023288188,0.92191076,0.019389188,0.00028151416,0.0024596911,0.00017252589,0.051062312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062357476,0.0010817061,0.0003378923,0.7634522,0.0031956008,0.00016067456,0.0004092396,0.000069937334,0.22505702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98374325,0.00079118717,0.0007666826,0.0010309396,0.0081625,0.0055053546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814076,0.004002972,0.0006793231,0.000509634,0.008481944,0.004918387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009545707,0.0016739873,0.001538974,0.0020409662,0.018033477,0.011802583,0.006313108,0.11554569,0.034380656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029092588,0.002063794,0.003338122,0.002575248,0.00605507,0.0031813176,0.0042709876,0.03586407,0.007856614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035411256,0.000018646939,0.0004225406,0.00004703926,0.0000134494585,0.00014832936,0.00016354617,0.000078901336,0.000079991754,0.0031564827,0.99425745,0.0015782211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008273494,0.000021616028,0.0036978356,0.0001807192,0.000039040093,0.000045064735,0.00064306654,0.00015561936,0.00015336782,0.0011162824,0.99378383,0.00008069277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9672743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11554569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081771314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21848138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5932952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152998903","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Statistics Related to Courts, Crime and Justice: Hate Crime, Cybercrime and Organized Crime Data from the UCR","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cybercrime; Criminology; Dark figure of crime; Crime statistics; Criminal justice; Hate crime; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.2114752518177409,"score_gpt":0.461260991834616,"score_spread":0.2497857400168751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152998903","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007162987,0.0008831158,0.00051872846,0.00169012,0.00030272343,0.0006801914,0.94082505,0.00074442016,0.053639352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008395834,0.0049888375,0.010205438,0.0015304699,0.00019846241,0.0020088274,0.72887534,0.0014763271,0.24232057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897529,0.00054035446,0.0011140995,0.00052370905,0.0067535616,0.0013152489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89581585,0.006300219,0.0023668262,0.00206386,0.090130635,0.0033226346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006465174,0.002006246,0.0017239904,0.0324015,0.005539358,0.006313392,0.0046792943,0.0017430293,0.17367987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054358073,0.0020582099,0.0018055919,0.053677652,0.0013854324,0.0025722147,0.0021323378,0.002450144,0.047130723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019104455,0.000019710897,0.0012815759,0.00031730454,0.000008149485,0.000012531495,0.00011514761,0.00016182514,0.000020242896,0.0021966272,0.9852989,0.0105489995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056364628,0.000012852593,0.025342658,0.0007925075,0.000032708223,0.000026047297,0.0005421935,0.00031680215,0.00024677612,0.00085259805,0.97170514,0.00007340124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99462044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17367987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06709798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3528451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.581017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153105991","doi":"","title":"De verdachte in beeld","year":2020,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Amsterdam eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immediacy; Videoconferencing; Political science; Standardization; Public relations; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.057197918245152225,"score_gpt":0.30185579895636033,"score_spread":0.24465788071120811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153105991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083510403,0.020413937,0.0015613973,0.0074056396,0.0040705195,0.000030583356,0.00020860982,0.000102908154,0.96537113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02065291,0.011381025,0.0010674347,0.0039038497,0.0009228711,0.0000498057,0.00023767952,0.00024054472,0.9615439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986467,0.00037661652,0.00007432203,0.00020174675,0.000545508,0.00015524989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947697,0.00023405565,0.000042488417,0.00007975092,0.00011829541,0.00004835353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008475096,0.00090773,0.0006057122,0.0015080681,0.0027326609,0.007153181,0.0010565259,0.002719265,0.13657282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029758331,0.0003707245,0.00043163646,0.0013118722,0.0039613727,0.0074410643,0.0040795053,0.003964838,0.052009158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048590686,0.000031407857,0.00011411208,0.00027101554,0.000008899241,0.00038804617,0.0030930305,0.0001491253,0.00034525097,0.49959162,0.3957973,0.1001616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002638434,0.0000034371292,0.0000441993,0.0001672526,0.0000013932028,0.00013095196,0.00030846125,0.000030542415,0.000071678536,0.011829701,0.9874062,0.0000036144581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064800335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012805007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13657282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038644613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019746772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45688158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153280904","doi":"","title":"The Limits of Legislation as a Tool of Reform: A Study of the Westray Reform to Organizational Sentencing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Legislature; Political science; Reform Act; Law; Criminal law; Law and economics; Law reform; Humanities; Public administration; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02799897484760974,"score_gpt":0.3049734801350045,"score_spread":0.2769745052873948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153280904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80472994,0.0024075082,0.005038868,0.026810527,0.00006986054,0.000115235496,0.00003563326,0.000020470228,0.16077204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994666,0.0003750816,0.00034738609,0.00078926276,0.000027304024,0.0000635224,0.000007496665,0.000012225728,0.0037118054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807695,0.013969926,0.00043459595,0.0007583096,0.0021609091,0.001906763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96212476,0.029861024,0.003983629,0.0011876399,0.0019711328,0.0008717486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014414702,0.00018033847,0.0006128863,0.0021210902,0.008876866,0.009861908,0.0019449865,0.003507243,0.0042237104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03628954,0.0004279471,0.00036499402,0.0024445504,0.028229933,0.0112157045,0.0053595253,0.005742259,0.00028744704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042974196,0.00015665479,0.0037833436,0.00011518888,0.000010589168,0.00047901148,0.24146463,0.0006262251,0.00023474854,0.73824316,0.0013376124,0.013505915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057089826,0.00040470343,0.054915182,0.001296543,0.00006879049,0.00036675617,0.5952504,0.0051700124,0.0014856232,0.14922896,0.19164293,0.00011301135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037332464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037640933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037332464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022365937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009627972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16227698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153394644","doi":"10.69554/cvje6605","title":"Data protection and privacy in Canada: A balanced approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied marketing analytics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Privacy protection; Data Protection Act 1998; Computer science; Information privacy; Business","score_opus":0.07614690909519434,"score_gpt":0.2934011525176709,"score_spread":0.21725424342247657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153394644","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010182622,0.023895683,0.019092102,0.7472579,0.0016042957,0.00029214082,0.0008499104,0.000117255586,0.19670816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61446524,0.05693235,0.053633284,0.19482778,0.0024255712,0.00051381264,0.0007892036,0.0003162267,0.076096475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93549633,0.013277404,0.0022503966,0.0038732605,0.034569938,0.010532741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92261416,0.02239336,0.0019212135,0.0023699976,0.04259289,0.008108387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03252264,0.0009971495,0.0019471091,0.012726236,0.030037325,0.037938815,0.004964506,0.015593145,0.0047894972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061777975,0.0015398434,0.0014452023,0.015583208,0.026537934,0.013575731,0.010396328,0.020374835,0.0006068375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021023112,0.00002591081,0.0020825143,0.00017052083,0.000042344993,0.00029166957,0.0032684125,0.0011302724,0.00013451283,0.91659665,0.047136202,0.029100098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048930888,0.00003721103,0.0069505307,0.00276349,0.0001658052,0.00030129473,0.018681914,0.004381806,0.0005382912,0.41269162,0.55320483,0.00023425011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29574203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29574203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.51255834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8168394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153775865","doi":"","title":"Familial DNA Searching and the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Charter; Law enforcement; Political science; Criminal investigation; Law; Search and seizure; Internet privacy; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.015934804188315183,"score_gpt":0.301017470300988,"score_spread":0.28508266611267286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153775865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021622429,0.009390509,0.03734666,0.26921806,0.004646937,0.000297285,0.0015074122,0.00090109906,0.6550696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458907,0.01248763,0.06979763,0.052780434,0.0024596083,0.0003847724,0.0015456807,0.00067805854,0.21397552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738771,0.0058018155,0.0009167474,0.003681133,0.012131513,0.003591745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494129,0.020829761,0.0030629507,0.0068009216,0.015161752,0.0047316127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026085382,0.0005641513,0.00071472174,0.006739772,0.019970682,0.017059615,0.0039022611,0.005997603,0.013441553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06411869,0.0007344577,0.000555337,0.005171179,0.041910388,0.009315023,0.007770298,0.008283549,0.0020410712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001852888,0.000010873035,0.0014013102,0.000053597407,0.0000037695256,0.00016662339,0.0043150103,0.00017625811,0.00009409814,0.8815391,0.07673467,0.035486195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019696488,0.00002349183,0.0044772113,0.00063390576,0.000025602534,0.00047183523,0.003817651,0.0007986629,0.00053211924,0.20008376,0.78899586,0.00012022947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74713176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7815483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25286824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037103884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100902244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5087148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154330720","doi":"10.71781/1806","title":"La communication de la preuve civile au préalable dans les litiges commerciaux internationaux","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08230419390672043,"score_gpt":0.41598245748313656,"score_spread":0.3336782635764161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154330720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50958294,0.0020437192,0.01378578,0.026410257,0.00026118036,0.00030529138,0.00023388446,0.00006470206,0.4473122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90175176,0.00095375243,0.0023666045,0.0027359847,0.000056814755,0.00017115404,0.000094364514,0.000025748295,0.091843806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931399,0.0023469694,0.00022179532,0.00075143954,0.0018946597,0.0016452441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98741794,0.006161387,0.0014190137,0.001203469,0.0030072553,0.00079101336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005995585,0.00039988421,0.00034151963,0.0010906877,0.012374253,0.007827771,0.001333257,0.0035762493,0.016974978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017029177,0.00038936586,0.00038181696,0.0013727994,0.0081498595,0.0028579282,0.0035398502,0.003953916,0.002016334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021462959,0.00016686508,0.046155564,0.00040226206,0.00006307337,0.003618443,0.30180737,0.0010297323,0.0069805277,0.5211433,0.02160686,0.09681138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006891679,0.00031220028,0.1414946,0.0013129677,0.00013462533,0.0013478071,0.26100162,0.001634925,0.006506853,0.043153092,0.5428525,0.0001798312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38916934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48615775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38916934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016843665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03256172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77380824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154864199","doi":"","title":"Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest: A Case Comment on the Ontario Court of Appeal's Decision in R. v Fearon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Phone; Smart phone; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03024602025830636,"score_gpt":0.3104287704989319,"score_spread":0.28018275024062556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154864199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038863428,0.0020937568,0.0009083986,0.8401868,0.003986255,0.00019881612,0.00074984634,0.00015077276,0.1128619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15929736,0.0027976665,0.00070857885,0.7321633,0.0035748251,0.00019932898,0.0002639333,0.00013101193,0.10086406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925383,0.00067475624,0.00050876767,0.00089924777,0.002881333,0.0024976055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175984,0.0045111612,0.0004605243,0.00024847832,0.0018331612,0.0011868966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005253,0.0008665267,0.000921874,0.0013403109,0.02919695,0.0069821533,0.0050544967,0.041344482,0.0059259073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018090986,0.0014643666,0.0020823237,0.0023683875,0.0075118854,0.0024363582,0.0025170338,0.036129322,0.0012325787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001797813,0.000085161526,0.008305222,0.00017752722,0.00008755376,0.010452354,0.035160787,0.0004855586,0.0020747844,0.08035902,0.85346913,0.009163069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017455047,0.0001400697,0.024200594,0.00076952245,0.00052449777,0.0021846897,0.03804359,0.0011598269,0.0015913635,0.010881153,0.9197805,0.0005496789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9460566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05481262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05481262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07382016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3976953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154957571","doi":"","title":"Proving History: The Role of the Expert","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Gatekeeping; Supreme court; Certainty; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Function (biology); Political science; Admissible evidence; Principal (computer security); Law; Flexibility (engineering); Indigenous; Administration of justice; Epistemology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.023381213690428546,"score_gpt":0.29532527265618524,"score_spread":0.2719440589657567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154957571","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059109293,0.02366929,0.023478074,0.8033473,0.0052218647,0.00006357951,0.000051138606,0.00014009126,0.13811773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46097657,0.014817297,0.025515402,0.42634988,0.005451772,0.0001910341,0.000061729545,0.00016865502,0.066467665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9645685,0.020641612,0.001476546,0.0045552948,0.0055484,0.0032096412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9034744,0.08089228,0.0014738548,0.0027729685,0.0073962263,0.0039902553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051364105,0.00067438785,0.00089539203,0.003041494,0.019149667,0.018960439,0.0038056506,0.023783837,0.007737694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06418395,0.000834479,0.0006455536,0.001047926,0.052363712,0.03005868,0.0089129545,0.020699237,0.0018026344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026216285,0.000023067447,0.00057211705,0.0001247314,0.0000144901205,0.0009505958,0.018976692,0.00019595589,0.0003158214,0.8431481,0.10316869,0.03248339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024316823,0.000042578526,0.00038581176,0.0009881265,0.00001924889,0.0007442243,0.012341563,0.00057732576,0.0007332824,0.5457935,0.4382582,0.00009190824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01833303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021865336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051364105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010704533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022359917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27164263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155074877","doi":"","title":"Digital Evidence and the Adversarial System: A Recipe for Disaster?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legislature; Deference; Judicial deference; Constitutionality; Political science; Law and economics; Adjudication; Law; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03518808634820638,"score_gpt":0.33194664786966277,"score_spread":0.2967585615214564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155074877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007163836,0.01098635,0.053394802,0.853433,0.0023710232,0.00013523275,0.00016019792,0.00019524693,0.072160296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67816395,0.017898625,0.06378382,0.19865987,0.0072596218,0.0005987729,0.00022212014,0.00036987613,0.03304329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688279,0.018887978,0.0014141501,0.003401843,0.0057645543,0.0017036624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89302737,0.07330377,0.0058834977,0.01661917,0.007486248,0.0036799486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05241715,0.00083614094,0.0012789804,0.0046117604,0.0073419786,0.022946035,0.0047967713,0.020072887,0.009713585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11300348,0.00087408995,0.0013241709,0.0025588037,0.062005177,0.05133638,0.016163258,0.029853571,0.0020522596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001646507,0.000019002067,0.00047070463,0.000058108242,0.000016009406,0.000103185186,0.00097110803,0.00029178188,0.000061237435,0.97511077,0.010271286,0.01261034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023463013,0.000023002573,0.00025140747,0.0002900407,0.000011477515,0.00018397102,0.0009896577,0.00062672934,0.00015822673,0.93341416,0.063993044,0.000034873745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035937836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029291178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05241715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065903054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010628191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27721167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155889527","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v28i2.4805","title":"A Correctional Plan for the Canadian Federal Penitentiary System","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08348274547826251,"score_gpt":0.3210316049180903,"score_spread":0.2375488594398278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155889527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4205361,0.0067155655,0.0057211365,0.18654811,0.0020843085,0.0055057188,0.008151768,0.00046743653,0.36426973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78914285,0.0028121735,0.012023824,0.009881826,0.00014535013,0.0007044259,0.001763373,0.00007398308,0.18345225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957741,0.000347633,0.00012457102,0.00022260491,0.0012126181,0.0023185282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926964,0.0003654624,0.00017504567,0.00013216215,0.004380631,0.0022502851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026174108,0.00045343136,0.0003224454,0.0028892995,0.017253729,0.0062290593,0.0029260002,0.0043229125,0.013804158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01013329,0.000694237,0.0007582313,0.001766326,0.001287151,0.0014389066,0.002262119,0.0026082923,0.00055907696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002688506,0.0005067754,0.107155666,0.0007045804,0.00013845644,0.0028074384,0.011466959,0.013584537,0.002269784,0.26854435,0.4389084,0.1536442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000264387,0.00036936562,0.3353966,0.001976738,0.00031927996,0.0005423064,0.044615973,0.01649455,0.0013551617,0.0119564375,0.586204,0.0005051683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99510694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99884844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1321158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1321158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43050703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158122767","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v25i1.5022","title":"“With Liberty and Justice for All”? A Look at Criminal Justice in America when the Blindfold is Removed*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05467087593697693,"score_gpt":0.34480966713022976,"score_spread":0.2901387911932528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158122767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046483106,0.008302635,0.00010452945,0.970192,0.0051549478,0.0000067466603,0.000020693013,0.000007468976,0.011562579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19582857,0.015492851,0.00055926846,0.7502774,0.010495729,0.00008267592,0.000060702256,0.000088049615,0.02711474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946043,0.001830679,0.00015512733,0.00038087077,0.0005293485,0.0024996917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924501,0.0025958507,0.00043363418,0.00015341605,0.0011976153,0.003169427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00485439,0.00043193588,0.00069951115,0.0015998938,0.03588599,0.016667603,0.0023373878,0.023633787,0.0070413826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012390446,0.0006252373,0.0008526752,0.002233068,0.021765744,0.020488575,0.0071415277,0.042719096,0.00040281244],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003812505,0.00011320485,0.0031611663,0.00017567001,0.000016264934,0.0008586752,0.036584932,0.00006813528,0.00014255104,0.22090904,0.7172199,0.020712307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000278571,0.00005989024,0.0131638665,0.0013133413,0.000028354943,0.0004158912,0.13254833,0.00016258832,0.00014339465,0.076762974,0.77526814,0.00010537039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2420879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5100196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2420879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017171672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059828788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48135757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159314728","doi":"10.24908/fede.v22i1.14459","title":"Addressing the NCR System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Jurisdiction; Political science; Focus (optics); Public administration; Federal jurisdiction; Federalism; Business; Law","score_opus":0.25231660590179555,"score_gpt":0.4043100161719303,"score_spread":0.15199341027013474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159314728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15260306,0.007260733,0.022500828,0.27158222,0.0014045176,0.0004353775,0.0005473496,0.00018603976,0.5434798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92461574,0.0016305796,0.0070452257,0.030088164,0.00037792313,0.00011208417,0.00017850328,0.000039264356,0.035912503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977128,0.005357938,0.00095145765,0.003100506,0.0075684083,0.005893619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97915834,0.00487653,0.0023172693,0.0029632421,0.009135963,0.0015487835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139470855,0.0002686457,0.00055381306,0.0015251217,0.01199724,0.007121641,0.0026558847,0.006568259,0.0057276064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03176259,0.00032336864,0.00047192027,0.0019892456,0.0129331825,0.0038357708,0.005331937,0.0061903405,0.0005778351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014643469,0.000017504624,0.0062796357,0.000113569644,0.00001368584,0.00028343216,0.0068154596,0.0003697144,0.0006679253,0.9495221,0.013320322,0.02258199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003810848,0.000107322696,0.033092488,0.00074313645,0.00008637308,0.00078786525,0.011203414,0.0016491455,0.002066874,0.17979105,0.77032524,0.0001089977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7048779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8082946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7048779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052082274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11313962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5937202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159602959","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Human Rights Code’s Distributive and Recognitional Functions in the Workplace","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive property; Code (set theory); Business; Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics","score_opus":0.034135031908694456,"score_gpt":0.26524797259001065,"score_spread":0.2311129406813162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159602959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04109463,0.004734835,0.006708188,0.08642938,0.0009056192,0.00014152649,0.00028518474,0.00006109264,0.8596396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73370445,0.0032476392,0.0057470445,0.011400633,0.00027947873,0.00016175081,0.00012971212,0.000065499364,0.24526387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894577,0.0014642848,0.0002982329,0.0005876814,0.0057803094,0.0024118596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904422,0.0031373764,0.0006180547,0.0005695835,0.003736152,0.0014965322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004057437,0.00032533938,0.00027529616,0.0018242594,0.016724218,0.00704403,0.0012556799,0.005274732,0.004281399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011580593,0.00045828862,0.0003585759,0.0022849012,0.021604817,0.0026122015,0.0030097624,0.0032962488,0.00053242844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017525139,0.000013663738,0.0036236774,0.00004952939,0.000003898609,0.00020054584,0.017711507,0.0001843096,0.0002733897,0.91416085,0.04012522,0.023635942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023747214,0.000023494962,0.023472074,0.00035276407,0.000013925389,0.00016427322,0.011533522,0.00059799326,0.00047696353,0.053676922,0.9095577,0.00010652095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96556824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.983533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91414607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08585393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12988378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62291676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159747714","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10017","title":"Freedom of Thought in Canada: The History of a Forgetting and the Potential of a Remembering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Phenomenon; Freedom of thought; Law; Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; Forgetting; Freedom of the press; Freedom of association; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.030290128625064618,"score_gpt":0.2543291883215786,"score_spread":0.22403905969651397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159747714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0997482,0.019111255,0.0059768367,0.21409374,0.0013508509,0.00008181218,0.0007458676,0.00014770735,0.6587438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626539,0.004041716,0.0009637013,0.0066415663,0.00019195369,0.00001807781,0.00008939863,0.00006361884,0.025335945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906865,0.0016086814,0.00028002428,0.0010586506,0.0037539543,0.0026122436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782492,0.008839109,0.0009097975,0.0018361502,0.007273075,0.0028925675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007923509,0.00030870808,0.0007159236,0.0033476828,0.030423807,0.016228888,0.0028881745,0.0041975332,0.013309503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021498304,0.00038696284,0.0005139237,0.004888343,0.06417114,0.0050012544,0.005539413,0.0077333166,0.00044733568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035287667,0.0000142524505,0.0012056695,0.00006559123,0.000008562115,0.00028649974,0.018334838,0.00029585196,0.00007629126,0.93392223,0.021042567,0.024712482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029517812,0.000026905047,0.007527186,0.00086413056,0.000030873012,0.00029915772,0.021368537,0.00078714004,0.00039673937,0.2048006,0.7636978,0.00017146954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98496443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16032031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16032031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18003027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97390944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161893035","doi":"10.32920/24233095","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Secret Law and the Special Advocate System in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Secrecy; National security; Law; Certificate; Political science; Security interest; Clearance; Computer science","score_opus":0.0209342376014512,"score_gpt":0.265503398194201,"score_spread":0.2445691605927498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161893035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3988825,0.006197288,0.0024606176,0.14878209,0.0009081072,0.0003503711,0.0004215918,0.00009493971,0.44190246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316805,0.002380081,0.0011323259,0.015304581,0.00007096771,0.00004783847,0.000083193016,0.000039082024,0.049261406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882869,0.0011648823,0.0002514662,0.0006992674,0.0035654271,0.006032102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876956,0.0030641893,0.00084145117,0.00035563935,0.0036079763,0.0044351467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043667085,0.00038749145,0.00047314411,0.0022603183,0.05003927,0.014762475,0.0037056664,0.006080043,0.008148822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014196316,0.0006972326,0.0007002839,0.0046540676,0.016706841,0.003477472,0.007142586,0.009461497,0.00039053013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007197823,0.000101657475,0.019854613,0.00017554521,0.000040590363,0.0033913292,0.08100707,0.0007294211,0.00053900905,0.790451,0.069734745,0.033903114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009294355,0.000063735315,0.060148384,0.000848062,0.00015672913,0.00092487835,0.2870349,0.0023721047,0.000975421,0.039459236,0.60757834,0.00034536768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99664825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.794754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20524597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36424047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92180204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163644874","doi":"","title":"LE DROIT A L'INFORMATION GOUVERNEMENTALE: L'INTERPRETATION RESTRICTIVE DES EXCEPTIONS S'IMPOSE-T-ELLE TOUJOURS COMME LA BONNE?","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Access to information; Information access; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04539991461337515,"score_gpt":0.31120393074152175,"score_spread":0.2658040161281466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163644874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021397598,0.03771255,0.0070091807,0.40034726,0.0022900347,0.00007899855,0.00036419302,0.000099538054,0.5307007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72066385,0.022615826,0.0053201085,0.16046764,0.0018658887,0.00011509169,0.00021361113,0.00011111377,0.08862693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97669923,0.005810995,0.000985989,0.0017467559,0.010787005,0.00397007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866479,0.0078015025,0.00080671615,0.0008172193,0.0034988206,0.00042787535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01565527,0.0005655624,0.0010389596,0.002683672,0.012236836,0.020455858,0.003681897,0.015465964,0.003476965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029836915,0.0006256835,0.00078543276,0.0025676775,0.0388421,0.0073565017,0.0035421667,0.01645881,0.0010130734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001685517,0.0000076210504,0.00037674123,0.0000846312,0.0000084966605,0.00025516763,0.0049737934,0.00005966207,0.00018004465,0.9641124,0.021891559,0.008033082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004354802,0.00002905952,0.00503484,0.0017379601,0.00008310465,0.00042870155,0.010192999,0.0004417611,0.0010760097,0.29049972,0.690297,0.00013539894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7499767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8006419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2500233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031476784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051993918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50299144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164765015","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3309921","title":"A Primer on Interlocutory Injunctions","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Primer (cosmetics); Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01723984645550887,"score_gpt":0.31117517846627407,"score_spread":0.2939353320107652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164765015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032226522,0.14715096,0.16405858,0.17617808,0.010621758,0.00030982797,0.00039464486,0.0002674202,0.49779603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20658408,0.24229424,0.08830402,0.14624372,0.021476107,0.0015595686,0.0006657542,0.0007479889,0.29212454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059045,0.004522878,0.00091181207,0.0009812944,0.002239237,0.0007543301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97353995,0.023272503,0.0005567554,0.0010430826,0.0012416125,0.00034625674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012728261,0.0012025716,0.0014864957,0.007028915,0.0047517824,0.01444289,0.004057503,0.022218829,0.017789477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018788245,0.001474124,0.0017035771,0.004194672,0.02214058,0.03022198,0.006815935,0.025189769,0.0060714446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047797353,0.000022233864,0.00004894486,0.0000901427,0.0000024202798,0.00006489789,0.00044952187,0.0001779287,0.000056826,0.96110016,0.011966422,0.026015805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054929355,0.000029724959,0.00011484419,0.0015065243,0.00000525504,0.00028091008,0.00039461412,0.00032509424,0.00020866356,0.60032684,0.39677718,0.000024880013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024210094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033004344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022218829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049448246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050559235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06731427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165723968","doi":"","title":"Canadian Legal Developments","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.025074134614304855,"score_gpt":0.27685606041164285,"score_spread":0.251781925797338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165723968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035812552,0.0070459335,0.0005104792,0.030211452,0.0015069022,0.00011713264,0.003969458,0.00013240387,0.95292497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09036701,0.012831187,0.0037110462,0.027615784,0.00056321593,0.00020083577,0.004007206,0.0001755569,0.8605281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075526,0.00041075723,0.00023024237,0.00096381933,0.00523085,0.0024090714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894343,0.0010482173,0.00027167343,0.00045576948,0.0070811007,0.0017089376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036719837,0.0008874523,0.0006368564,0.0064754183,0.031771593,0.011731353,0.0034622846,0.0053330907,0.08984738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141935535,0.0007870072,0.00080111733,0.00823403,0.0048377616,0.0026789925,0.0034783627,0.006474906,0.008314382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001314778,0.00001872171,0.00092985143,0.00011410529,0.000006895205,0.0002629634,0.0017615325,0.00012019655,0.00010309311,0.3721292,0.5978899,0.02665042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027697522,0.0000023350246,0.001272979,0.00008661041,0.000005321975,0.00004162733,0.0004828804,0.000054047454,0.00004422902,0.0025477894,0.99544734,0.000012161088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98876834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99467355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14479353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14479353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24498627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99191827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165917194","doi":"","title":"Les secrets de commerce, un droit éparpillé en attente d’une loi","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026966500140954464,"score_gpt":0.2909492631034481,"score_spread":0.2639827629624936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165917194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023123054,0.007427299,0.009521261,0.060269993,0.0016187801,0.00010180461,0.0007718298,0.00025774172,0.89690834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31593463,0.0065883812,0.004377547,0.01281248,0.00077098253,0.00011465548,0.0007636189,0.00024035694,0.6583973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995654,0.00092957186,0.00015224157,0.00054133346,0.0018065656,0.00091619673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946213,0.0011346311,0.00045041306,0.00080400053,0.002217233,0.0007724572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031851833,0.0006438724,0.00048508696,0.0015497287,0.010174853,0.013365991,0.0012786924,0.004181829,0.033463877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007432452,0.00051658804,0.00046382868,0.0018970763,0.010945714,0.0067289877,0.0041778516,0.0052056056,0.0063414117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006347234,0.000029986588,0.0028094272,0.00019406281,0.000019708903,0.00032546782,0.014972419,0.0002791846,0.0010693134,0.84041756,0.09205597,0.047763437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008358549,0.000014178306,0.003017777,0.00025716342,0.000009486683,0.000110528585,0.0033483498,0.00012916703,0.00037289597,0.018356476,0.97434425,0.00003124728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41510576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4785797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41510576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018416945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037150778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82537913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167020393","doi":"","title":"A Jurisprudential “House of Cards”: The Power to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence in Civil Proceedings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Nothing; Jurisprudence; Political science; Power (physics); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061878701009776646,"score_gpt":0.3434289064114926,"score_spread":0.28155020540171594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167020393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018927364,0.07268125,0.019001726,0.5811934,0.0041310675,0.00022388018,0.00011894804,0.000092292554,0.3036302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75611985,0.028684312,0.016793594,0.16126016,0.005286241,0.00025323418,0.000064883956,0.00011583031,0.03142194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9051734,0.045315005,0.0055244025,0.008160311,0.030016415,0.00581041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87119764,0.09375836,0.0045230202,0.0067537697,0.020065682,0.0037015213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06236711,0.00038400994,0.0012929381,0.003917234,0.01645586,0.02356669,0.0049312557,0.020670556,0.0021967501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12459717,0.001267545,0.0008179644,0.0025864756,0.0782378,0.010927083,0.007120067,0.021022411,0.0007244977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010157627,0.00001255955,0.00042753425,0.00015740702,0.000015624799,0.00026992252,0.0043708226,0.00009218812,0.0002162661,0.95594656,0.021663152,0.01681775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008363015,0.00007960138,0.0029655911,0.0019630084,0.00008322978,0.00052849686,0.0048505594,0.0005002782,0.00071299355,0.4858055,0.5022825,0.00014470128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10920338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19976394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01731866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058388423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32983273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168285016","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Animal Law in Canada: A Case for Federal Animal Welfare Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Federalism; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Legislature; Jurisprudence; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Federal law; Politics","score_opus":0.027300680925867966,"score_gpt":0.286120793130313,"score_spread":0.25882011220444506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168285016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11850697,0.027627146,0.0068497034,0.43697923,0.001519597,0.00024339664,0.0004416651,0.000089527806,0.40774274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8573137,0.012763206,0.0046831574,0.08957381,0.0003608824,0.00011277924,0.00019565164,0.00004439937,0.034952424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818615,0.0020964139,0.00044366714,0.0012203687,0.0076578106,0.006720246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817539,0.007411567,0.0010837098,0.00063701783,0.0066483,0.002465495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009441845,0.0003424563,0.0007220932,0.0029717048,0.03302879,0.012747043,0.0030594962,0.010077463,0.003710687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02452653,0.00066941493,0.0010580755,0.004338061,0.027643675,0.0047561745,0.005287166,0.012760239,0.00022173223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024460958,0.000027291346,0.004279912,0.00010295973,0.000021740638,0.00049858185,0.007366219,0.000511879,0.00020036238,0.9572481,0.01862877,0.011089814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011888176,0.000071344744,0.043764725,0.0020655936,0.0002810875,0.00046295833,0.022800801,0.0029304463,0.00078822824,0.23683412,0.6895669,0.00031478866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99683845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20379159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20379159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35139787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9234889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170316163","doi":"","title":"The Early Years (1985-2000): Pioneering the Charter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Parliament; Law; Legitimacy; Political science; Period (music); Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.019196475312868302,"score_gpt":0.3035101797308633,"score_spread":0.28431370441799503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170316163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056967013,0.06310389,0.0028556823,0.18743221,0.008451475,0.00026954108,0.001130887,0.00015959487,0.6796297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6728856,0.02783912,0.002493533,0.0601411,0.0039657145,0.00018301794,0.0005128143,0.00016603107,0.23181315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902806,0.0014809503,0.00027219768,0.0007325267,0.0045922347,0.0026413484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859443,0.0058147134,0.0011437691,0.0007007331,0.0038835132,0.0025130366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01198335,0.00031388504,0.00026624068,0.0029535692,0.009490463,0.014739239,0.0011515438,0.005019573,0.0037336228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025566721,0.0005267466,0.00023899974,0.004078173,0.009697209,0.005905347,0.0030692199,0.0063071344,0.00070370047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006755633,0.000039953906,0.001851195,0.00016081399,0.000008885427,0.0006550747,0.010447904,0.00023439749,0.0005589867,0.70956874,0.23459744,0.041809134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009952615,0.000015069938,0.006392455,0.00017991936,0.00000488222,0.000053257656,0.0009626404,0.000043527863,0.0003538195,0.0061746887,0.9857867,0.000023013516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6510576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78160304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056519493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098680094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170381205","doi":"10.29173/alr2695","title":"Breaches, Bargains, and Exclusion of Evidence: Bringing The Administration of Justice Into Disrepute","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10007347982826421,"score_gpt":0.3878837029583781,"score_spread":0.2878102231301139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170381205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08513477,0.010546652,0.03906428,0.25063145,0.0011899761,0.000251634,0.00008906795,0.0001617953,0.61293036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94620895,0.0025560663,0.00863907,0.02381492,0.0004964205,0.000114938055,0.000028198068,0.000072145,0.018069237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91496813,0.03245754,0.0030224712,0.006221883,0.029400928,0.013929001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95274985,0.031337086,0.0030096392,0.002914709,0.0071460353,0.002842716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046868425,0.00083847984,0.0010908939,0.003193468,0.02885277,0.031072432,0.0061473874,0.023892866,0.0035124077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08698139,0.0012009798,0.001120349,0.0024106747,0.105514735,0.015200966,0.017938646,0.026486864,0.00060175534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020332573,0.000026019201,0.0006327079,0.000030248733,0.000012588785,0.000269712,0.008893138,0.0004266506,0.00014716048,0.9770691,0.0041303183,0.008342032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006976182,0.00008822253,0.0036136082,0.00053068175,0.000100965095,0.00024744106,0.014266136,0.0020002073,0.0009262778,0.885697,0.09225299,0.00020666728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47560388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56015503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47560388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051823508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.119962156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9456711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170456961","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing De Minimis Non Curat Lex","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Law; Political science; Statute; Criminal code; Charter; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02714707616689497,"score_gpt":0.32566866911246806,"score_spread":0.29852159294557307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170456961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021642346,0.0037921534,0.080509484,0.03947798,0.0015279719,0.00025962605,0.000538941,0.00046222014,0.8517892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69701785,0.0024747353,0.061344337,0.021122439,0.001238895,0.001060902,0.0010317817,0.0009856997,0.21372339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816867,0.0073637622,0.0011669501,0.002769769,0.005412048,0.001600772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886841,0.0045875255,0.0007272914,0.0033627374,0.0023656834,0.00027264096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012690291,0.0010264203,0.0010366051,0.00476856,0.0054285834,0.0149475485,0.0034202198,0.006509047,0.014845779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025107231,0.00083812716,0.0011005658,0.0025739965,0.022851605,0.015736498,0.0099163465,0.008217874,0.0036238232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045550332,0.0000048790976,0.0001053947,0.000019325458,0.0000040287837,0.00003107408,0.0014781931,0.000058022477,0.000049442322,0.9917361,0.0024013084,0.004107667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014212339,0.000017485276,0.00054772396,0.00028517484,0.00002111657,0.00021344579,0.0022357977,0.00073562114,0.0006511334,0.7553306,0.23991539,0.000032237265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119817015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01951652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149475485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012861622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012730124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093318045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170502834","doi":"","title":"Automatism and the Burden of Proof: An Alternative Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Automatism (medicine); Pleading; Bullion; Burden of proof; Supreme court; Force majeure; Presumption; Law; Reasonable doubt; Res ipsa loquitur; Conviction; Law and economics; Decriminalization; Extraterritoriality; Acquiescence; Contingency; Indictment; Witness; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Jurisdiction; Liability; History","score_opus":0.027666045119082595,"score_gpt":0.3013957625948746,"score_spread":0.273729717475792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170502834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019817801,0.007123537,0.32561314,0.11922945,0.0015986032,0.00061848876,0.0002868332,0.00018327612,0.52552885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77421606,0.0037170746,0.13406822,0.022055749,0.003722204,0.0010788601,0.00008883085,0.00016514007,0.060887884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718759,0.01152385,0.0011885852,0.003679124,0.009655651,0.002076892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9482099,0.033126973,0.0022600016,0.008634989,0.0064314622,0.0013366768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02386267,0.0018569289,0.0016337056,0.0074348547,0.0056738616,0.0151118105,0.007421573,0.0220976,0.01971154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05677967,0.0013060725,0.0027970274,0.0030297872,0.032932293,0.021550285,0.009861108,0.0157189,0.0025887783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097686525,0.000012012795,0.000050763683,0.000017927146,0.0000079995225,0.00006878014,0.00013634971,0.00018624536,0.00006633568,0.99657,0.00087436795,0.001999446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006372659,0.0000382998,0.00015457314,0.00013124572,0.000030711162,0.00018426031,0.00014158129,0.0025071807,0.00016671284,0.97522855,0.021323264,0.000029856685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008265674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007020619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02386267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0139612565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009542682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12619942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171534268","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Law Journal: Criminal Justice and Evidentiary Thresholds in Canada- The Last Ten Years 43(3) 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Calgary; University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Publishing; Law; Pleasure; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02300772216673051,"score_gpt":0.2754929415263409,"score_spread":0.2524852193596104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171534268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05329446,0.29761985,0.0010200085,0.3211965,0.019180402,0.0002014574,0.01575473,0.00027535384,0.2914573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47275946,0.21081649,0.0026244868,0.04502702,0.0053910604,0.00011079379,0.0065495702,0.00044605168,0.256275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603844,0.0001901704,0.00015965918,0.0002001893,0.002939238,0.00047226748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96599466,0.0034189636,0.0013470321,0.0005197795,0.024560194,0.0041593174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029482911,0.00041600125,0.00055481214,0.0068749525,0.007811013,0.010992794,0.0014944688,0.0029262018,0.027170543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020386444,0.00050328835,0.0003281244,0.011126985,0.0041219657,0.0017673487,0.0014016558,0.0027854696,0.0022870088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003445026,0.00005004888,0.026689894,0.0005367472,0.00004109738,0.00018945547,0.001826255,0.00019884191,0.0002070938,0.020053864,0.88551617,0.06465621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011254428,0.000016642232,0.13689463,0.0016929028,0.00005342535,0.00027270598,0.0062933643,0.00035309797,0.00027843463,0.0035563835,0.8505135,0.000063635234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98378617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99456656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083864376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083864376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25738373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171617816","doi":"","title":"Schrems II et invalidation du Privacy Shield, un goût de « déjà vu »","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Déjà vu; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03887194882315802,"score_gpt":0.2768162615606441,"score_spread":0.23794431273748606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171617816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04177326,0.03859451,0.017051022,0.6635508,0.0084948735,0.00006977082,0.00029948202,0.00011397667,0.23005226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8293204,0.011153319,0.005452359,0.08749098,0.008023978,0.00022680237,0.00011461056,0.00016540886,0.05805214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98667264,0.0063824346,0.0010426741,0.0018611667,0.0027312473,0.0013097634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761129,0.018874936,0.0011749114,0.0018178279,0.0015834266,0.00043598856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013057075,0.0005233373,0.0012192538,0.0017582278,0.004115013,0.008428287,0.0014481512,0.015673459,0.0072872806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05582794,0.00050092663,0.0011303562,0.00095443113,0.02580119,0.011366563,0.0041820672,0.017722066,0.0008663429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002742841,0.0000057496854,0.00018438489,0.000045111407,0.000013260882,0.00032657688,0.0020481234,0.000077094825,0.000121303485,0.9778947,0.013119245,0.0061369706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049025686,0.000037462574,0.0007736334,0.0004624804,0.00003755576,0.00093630096,0.002985319,0.00053620734,0.0007208368,0.8387168,0.1546911,0.000053200234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009270842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005130218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015673459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004891288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054371497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172109281","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10018","title":"Introduction to a Comparative Study of the Right to Freedom of Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04399751502040146,"score_gpt":0.32629332117035204,"score_spread":0.2822958061499506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172109281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027320143,0.22594947,0.02436986,0.17046584,0.03086443,0.00032512742,0.0019966944,0.00011831866,0.5431783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21890298,0.31332004,0.057450507,0.093292214,0.11931277,0.0028893254,0.0036206162,0.0006711117,0.19054042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635905,0.0021597117,0.00018859521,0.00041950855,0.00070227694,0.00017081304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984721,0.0127298,0.00025281485,0.0005861088,0.0013154313,0.00039470938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005740451,0.00078623067,0.0011485858,0.0055643576,0.003411707,0.0051409258,0.0013983739,0.0043218965,0.044291567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373704,0.00046807725,0.0015465115,0.006288129,0.008148179,0.008082296,0.003506513,0.008106008,0.0029350163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016355049,0.000035889967,0.0001003601,0.0003390925,0.000012720064,0.000074387935,0.00061413937,0.00019299143,0.000120233584,0.8772586,0.10332974,0.017905507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013443748,0.000042361065,0.0008346322,0.0015172621,0.000011491602,0.00010009347,0.0005338262,0.00017169064,0.00007067962,0.3245592,0.67212534,0.00001992046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050833616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004405288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044291567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005926946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002492505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172337906","doi":"","title":"Dommages punitifs et action collective en droit québécois: Électrochoc aux fabricants de cigarettes","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"RTDciv : Revue Trimestrielle de droit civil","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06081302426901593,"score_gpt":0.3209518049488637,"score_spread":0.2601387806798478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172337906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48564106,0.004675968,0.0021923315,0.047173746,0.0007737844,0.00015186972,0.00038963705,0.000045951158,0.45895565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412985,0.0011109273,0.00055296393,0.0032234176,0.000047651174,0.000055198732,0.00011402885,0.000019547575,0.2535777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998858,0.00018457066,0.000017494951,0.000110507186,0.00036868447,0.00046080333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889046,0.00013894137,0.00008262277,0.000048203223,0.000449798,0.00039003583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008958644,0.00026207985,0.00016468814,0.0006228039,0.010379284,0.0040689684,0.0008039495,0.0018567577,0.014841728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001684431,0.00018826588,0.00024147096,0.00090189563,0.0041162106,0.0013063095,0.0015523997,0.0027541849,0.00056904973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022637368,0.0002555698,0.080704965,0.00029558557,0.000072628245,0.002683353,0.13394563,0.0013943958,0.0044037043,0.4938055,0.11579716,0.16641504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037476388,0.000100103185,0.18426187,0.00032704652,0.000042895077,0.00026613908,0.0654089,0.00090381515,0.0010282025,0.005688672,0.7418409,0.00009389935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97433543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99043757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04873463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04873463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044855565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3535962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172923753","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3854006","title":"Digitally Rethinking Hunter v Southam","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.023532968274534004,"score_gpt":0.30377815075381565,"score_spread":0.28024518247928165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172923753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097207576,0.0021461493,0.0058756815,0.2478241,0.0072285556,0.00024285693,0.00053954776,0.0007937217,0.6381418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42439225,0.0013725832,0.0035405299,0.28641874,0.0023100972,0.00028833744,0.0003280154,0.00048544427,0.28086394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331564,0.0011259546,0.00033391485,0.0010181807,0.0028231302,0.0013832648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97131854,0.020634484,0.00070494984,0.0034372262,0.002329264,0.0015756238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007901257,0.000323381,0.0003773574,0.0014544921,0.0059277355,0.008485496,0.0031232638,0.017055266,0.026559383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05031144,0.00061686337,0.0007532666,0.0008851957,0.0060159266,0.007075357,0.0072714086,0.013647879,0.004945622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001737797,0.0001586796,0.0059529743,0.00028431512,0.000065282744,0.002642274,0.010017479,0.0004271072,0.0026387132,0.4146013,0.4300454,0.13299274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009447952,0.0001052059,0.0058694337,0.00083470176,0.0001347601,0.00088476745,0.0035775262,0.00078430556,0.002974649,0.08330992,0.9013427,0.00008753741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030527055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07529835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030527055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032409024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012513305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08884996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175018809","doi":"","title":"Ius puniendi and Constitution: A Comparative (Canadian-German) Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; German; Obligation; Law; Human rights; Political science; Criminalization; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Constitutional court; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04852281668302009,"score_gpt":0.35195399515505726,"score_spread":0.30343117847203716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175018809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05760276,0.022378797,0.0036001736,0.023664769,0.00046472627,0.000043416036,0.00029026714,0.000037863443,0.8919172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751117,0.006350087,0.0012139643,0.0018596057,0.00008961346,0.000021419703,0.00007468678,0.000015338032,0.015263569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402505,0.0014219256,0.00012375937,0.0005190014,0.0017145728,0.0021958149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.0007811211,0.00016126018,0.0001149056,0.0005000584,0.00014813968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039000155,0.00041647165,0.0005432532,0.004994305,0.011965263,0.008585262,0.0015119647,0.0033031804,0.0073630894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006082386,0.00024850052,0.0003966707,0.006474869,0.02218818,0.0036441998,0.0027863637,0.002867366,0.00022371308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006626181,0.0000036608744,0.00025465278,0.000029668514,0.00000388726,0.00007791791,0.0023459077,0.00007974568,0.000037319165,0.9927239,0.0015729025,0.0028639643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000531916,0.000057758487,0.020832783,0.0010543016,0.00014173609,0.0005698061,0.026421355,0.00087672204,0.00068996765,0.31045118,0.63873047,0.000120775745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7862477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8624862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21375233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05621504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028696503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4300223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176644622","doi":"10.71781/2274","title":"La protection de la vie privée dans le cadre de la lutte contre le terrorisme au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02221603363352455,"score_gpt":0.3219413091953063,"score_spread":0.29972527556178175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176644622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26846677,0.008116079,0.0056653083,0.10776489,0.0010862004,0.0001638533,0.0017023956,0.00022598462,0.6068086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7933192,0.0023506782,0.0015709028,0.010123697,0.00008848046,0.000040921554,0.0002544928,0.00007056384,0.19218099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546707,0.00040867846,0.00006699687,0.00030707367,0.0016514347,0.00209869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524105,0.0005719189,0.00027637905,0.0002463508,0.0023891716,0.0012750714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017053873,0.00021345807,0.00029455358,0.0008680265,0.013970049,0.0071726665,0.0009825953,0.0023630655,0.014106933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052168784,0.00038583437,0.00039719115,0.0010560272,0.0057145464,0.0012761015,0.0022963295,0.0039814436,0.00065844384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001917233,0.000070927155,0.027387742,0.00036904114,0.00007583669,0.0011019513,0.024954505,0.0031684907,0.0034728183,0.73598427,0.124687746,0.07853497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023118635,0.000043949305,0.06450925,0.0004904305,0.000050398656,0.00022572489,0.013171466,0.0011074062,0.0014577529,0.0105133625,0.90826154,0.00014557198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99403256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08266241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08266241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20942916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5997606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176814128","doi":"10.7202/1077699ar","title":"L’arrêt Vavilov : à la recherche de l’équilibre perdu entre la primauté du droit et la suprématie législative","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06476375195694965,"score_gpt":0.3425187939748964,"score_spread":0.2777550420179467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176814128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2631993,0.039062995,0.01752293,0.16692473,0.001390207,0.000083280436,0.00047933083,0.00009481527,0.5112424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90325063,0.006122281,0.0023045498,0.0057156943,0.00017193088,0.00003607749,0.000110974215,0.00008404635,0.082203805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946109,0.0016003107,0.000124508,0.0009969706,0.0018745337,0.00079282495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994806,0.0025985437,0.0005832675,0.00026927775,0.0012874646,0.000455585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043880553,0.00028353417,0.00033069865,0.0014408276,0.0070907124,0.009330341,0.0011282085,0.0028263612,0.006742869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010634756,0.00030679454,0.00050097465,0.0017231592,0.0076890993,0.0031892299,0.0027738302,0.005338734,0.00068189105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054204265,0.000016419592,0.004849314,0.000074909825,0.000018200084,0.0001699734,0.01033115,0.00056231953,0.00044898,0.95787114,0.009445624,0.016157731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003753723,0.00010153366,0.041474137,0.0011192864,0.00008555521,0.00036835636,0.02660113,0.0029412257,0.0033222334,0.16395105,0.7598359,0.00016211884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45077685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.573745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45077685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03143592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036341354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89630604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176978327","doi":"","title":"The Law of Evidence, 8/E","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08485086586115496,"score_gpt":0.33247200833234447,"score_spread":0.2476211424711895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176978327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019715833,0.01653651,0.0020472258,0.01147655,0.0024694528,0.00004570752,0.0001745121,0.00008495782,0.9669679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01522627,0.021775104,0.0037996187,0.016063701,0.002517811,0.00014418997,0.0003355181,0.00019014823,0.93994766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824286,0.0003688987,0.00007816996,0.00019550345,0.0010159116,0.00009862308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879944,0.000492555,0.0000750613,0.00015197646,0.00040182727,0.00007917589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012625477,0.0006363716,0.00032587236,0.0015413822,0.002492135,0.007693823,0.0008102549,0.0026038652,0.029675776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052691787,0.00047915496,0.0003615401,0.001157074,0.0058409465,0.005726754,0.0019143578,0.004882481,0.015814696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051242373,0.0000071465993,0.00008487271,0.00011459352,0.0000026382243,0.000051869523,0.00035766768,0.00008016588,0.00010819397,0.51175016,0.45763204,0.029805558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010911164,0.0000022847441,0.00009127981,0.00016351083,8.6623726e-7,0.00005883915,0.000085577645,0.000044546894,0.000035775935,0.029501595,0.97001237,0.0000022887111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007633716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01108578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029675776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038619745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045446875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09927535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180126862","doi":"","title":"Mr. Big and the New Common Law Confessions Rule: Five Years in Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Discretion; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Test (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Management; Economics","score_opus":0.030696488304902278,"score_gpt":0.32737013601135195,"score_spread":0.29667364770644966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180126862","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032251375,0.99648917,0.000045314155,0.0021004332,0.0002656308,0.0000035482128,0.000008446657,0.0000010952674,0.00076385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0084017245,0.98721516,0.00012781165,0.0030469408,0.00089377956,0.000008794613,0.000024291508,0.000006694086,0.0002748031],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213684,0.0024669212,0.0010623217,0.0007059242,0.0029970205,0.0006310059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91298354,0.06300814,0.006502962,0.0010913583,0.015413657,0.0010003382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013888194,0.00054015854,0.0019996576,0.009365897,0.0015009242,0.0057389005,0.0019009843,0.004473752,0.0013207576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045375783,0.0010084761,0.0011199291,0.0125553375,0.0077624014,0.00629947,0.0012131626,0.0051511903,0.0005012142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019081224,0.00013591241,0.00463785,0.03507722,0.00048674477,0.0006299528,0.0030738115,0.0012005564,0.00030960483,0.1329796,0.12364136,0.69763654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023466133,0.00015154855,0.012844924,0.055216834,0.00029531153,0.0007120399,0.0025617504,0.00027964733,0.00023197068,0.008559669,0.9190388,0.00008411099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09671264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119743355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09671264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013928965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025055096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19229943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182379942","doi":"","title":"When Efficiency Calls: Rethinking the Obligation to Provide Reasons for Administrative Decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Balance (ability); Quality (philosophy); Supreme court; Law and economics; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Ideal (ethics); Economic shortage; Political science; Business; Law; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.07482044169617426,"score_gpt":0.3867717577138122,"score_spread":0.311951316017638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182379942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026571842,0.012245996,0.04458052,0.63872206,0.0056484053,0.00016328266,0.000117184434,0.00033160404,0.27161917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7890011,0.0050447853,0.02743692,0.13425991,0.0031968514,0.00025655536,0.000081050486,0.0004770457,0.040245686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91137516,0.046903312,0.0049149245,0.0057819444,0.022056527,0.008968066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7987501,0.159625,0.004324152,0.008982892,0.024349373,0.0039685117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07938843,0.00064205984,0.0010894223,0.00254783,0.016094424,0.029351927,0.0054805484,0.021421483,0.0038772582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14694825,0.0008982234,0.0012705383,0.0019829622,0.055271845,0.022699244,0.009268985,0.02914362,0.0009595078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017262535,0.000009745104,0.0003364842,0.00007162605,0.000007644703,0.00010766143,0.011994613,0.0001877328,0.00008682487,0.95497173,0.021060016,0.011148624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003798837,0.000026281474,0.0014710724,0.0011841826,0.000054293494,0.00016497038,0.015055362,0.0011654027,0.0007571244,0.4825288,0.4974371,0.00011745258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110632055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16099453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110632055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045898944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05815323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41985118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182697146","doi":"","title":"Dissipating Normative Fog: Revisiting the POGG's National Concern Test","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legislation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Test (biology); Abandonment (legal); Law; Doctrine; Legislature; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.05355706795702781,"score_gpt":0.3451867450639342,"score_spread":0.2916296771069064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182697146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12557968,0.0019772467,0.08848419,0.06955194,0.0009925098,0.00015726504,0.00016361977,0.0002003962,0.7128931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429316,0.00035564127,0.0046903635,0.005991322,0.0002740122,0.00011874028,0.000041705418,0.000052897263,0.004182118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98731685,0.0047421264,0.00050824304,0.0021202124,0.0040371045,0.0012754523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98033994,0.011932185,0.00152991,0.002275658,0.0033023502,0.00061989937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0156216,0.00044221847,0.0009937079,0.0025257238,0.0053509683,0.006887276,0.0025547382,0.005735229,0.004297437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04402151,0.00037434287,0.0010074645,0.0019446902,0.054241862,0.013612798,0.0075906743,0.008552268,0.00061080884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055541236,0.0000051824563,0.00032425942,0.000008084069,0.0000023183325,0.00003888633,0.0009189563,0.00011022697,0.000019247818,0.995871,0.0006156318,0.0020806098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015638632,0.000013695787,0.000663056,0.00004967668,0.0000064706223,0.00005479642,0.00086508505,0.0009842716,0.00013720148,0.9818048,0.015388745,0.000016570513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013800913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010046543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0156216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008890536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009401912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08261591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183808766","doi":"","title":"Innocence Compensation: The Success Rate of Actions for Negligent Investigation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Law; Mistake; Punitive damages; Political science; Tort reform; Compensation (psychology); Criminology; Business; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24044514039966616,"score_gpt":0.37750581917824655,"score_spread":0.13706067877858039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183808766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95339054,0.00143844,0.001387317,0.0019894587,0.00006225094,0.00021200762,0.00055903994,0.00003149127,0.04092935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974841,0.00032734039,0.00036104294,0.00013020415,0.000021372283,0.00006817107,0.00012761263,0.00000945283,0.0014706687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94575834,0.019789612,0.005620178,0.0016798757,0.023661256,0.0034907246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79674894,0.09575785,0.06606721,0.0082545215,0.025990507,0.007180977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027061557,0.00020518622,0.0005417836,0.007834343,0.0023486307,0.0031737655,0.0017093226,0.0010464152,0.0037021926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16494729,0.00021265872,0.00059654284,0.0030979307,0.004210429,0.0026095468,0.0032437795,0.001545919,0.00054629677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016477075,0.0001870034,0.8712905,0.00056184846,0.00022022182,0.0006967581,0.053306777,0.0003137257,0.0007496555,0.011388804,0.0038844093,0.05723557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008752832,0.00032741055,0.89026135,0.000619001,0.000096131014,0.0023053552,0.08413172,0.0006919783,0.001010631,0.0021610046,0.018249061,0.00013767742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010482639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015544415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98951733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038483234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004405518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14311689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184383708","doi":"","title":"Trial by Jury and the Toronto 18","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Terrorism; SWORD; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.050745364031610285,"score_gpt":0.4114201833595153,"score_spread":0.360674819327905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184383708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07645861,0.10547273,0.003990165,0.27255663,0.0052991984,0.00036180962,0.00077020226,0.00009292597,0.53499776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7981552,0.046618674,0.0031131585,0.045128696,0.0033152658,0.00050565315,0.00046368208,0.000097064476,0.10260258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812738,0.007480733,0.0010480782,0.0014433826,0.0062295487,0.0025244826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731513,0.014175776,0.0031574753,0.0011819949,0.005334845,0.0029984931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013718783,0.0002965757,0.0007888313,0.0025256071,0.009563088,0.008147917,0.0015923413,0.005580878,0.015664957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058283933,0.00053653563,0.000464675,0.002271455,0.013314288,0.0033940196,0.005914452,0.0061607356,0.0014726565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004812724,0.00007053542,0.01224552,0.00064466434,0.000084353924,0.0013133493,0.009568357,0.00085553824,0.00039547638,0.60738343,0.23693852,0.13001904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031358883,0.00048005907,0.050617244,0.0030642226,0.00013499401,0.0008213602,0.010464056,0.0007185232,0.00084101426,0.07458485,0.85774875,0.00021132421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25586152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48426983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7441385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02414207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042893052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5087445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184672076","doi":"","title":"Is Password Compulsion Constitutional in Canada? Two Views","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Silence; Suspect; Order (exchange); Constitution; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024288330935174966,"score_gpt":0.31428217725030105,"score_spread":0.2899938463151261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184672076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038282085,0.013674634,0.0016936405,0.7494004,0.0010937734,0.00008120803,0.00064418116,0.000051268238,0.19507872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6639748,0.013529752,0.0015689025,0.24983528,0.0010423905,0.00012343963,0.00033141667,0.00012712747,0.06946696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827619,0.0015105214,0.00045052657,0.0024629042,0.0071848836,0.0056292037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829522,0.006263648,0.0005403648,0.0007034857,0.006358692,0.0031815786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008307835,0.00059647515,0.0010017925,0.0024465083,0.03704727,0.01866847,0.0054441835,0.01628312,0.01088202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027719602,0.0008869662,0.00095891015,0.003919756,0.039002012,0.0076677324,0.005099431,0.021651862,0.0006112887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060431867,0.000028767001,0.0021759851,0.00011707117,0.000019643207,0.000465009,0.010353964,0.00023553589,0.00025905416,0.9098959,0.05964967,0.016739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016326894,0.00005068173,0.013184022,0.0011621247,0.00012844466,0.00032300563,0.04387304,0.0010372673,0.00095587334,0.25745368,0.6812109,0.000457727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99181014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1812911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1812911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2503522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185596930","doi":"","title":"Negotiating Trauma & Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.057483983902578355,"score_gpt":0.3935547551056512,"score_spread":0.3360707712030728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185596930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21837918,0.003660328,0.036392845,0.27525443,0.0015349035,0.00018027268,0.00006743419,0.00018390625,0.4643467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96987826,0.0010436727,0.0028257922,0.006881655,0.00011741872,0.00006505414,0.000024489826,0.00006144793,0.01910221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98487985,0.009379468,0.00038550806,0.00082687876,0.0018003582,0.0027278583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96570057,0.018356172,0.003407953,0.0022263979,0.0025766627,0.0077323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015556026,0.00047961395,0.00049858884,0.0025232476,0.022227475,0.020243576,0.0023005896,0.007443721,0.0294005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049853954,0.0007232819,0.00052526704,0.0013899052,0.049678136,0.017392192,0.020314142,0.014623513,0.0025715786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003836445,0.00036887222,0.009073131,0.00009018377,0.000018969298,0.0011315037,0.14364967,0.00048425692,0.000362043,0.77484816,0.0148894675,0.055045377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023841647,0.00008578659,0.003401171,0.0005270643,0.000016128619,0.0009984592,0.23279366,0.0007468356,0.000720754,0.6343154,0.12633163,0.00003940386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009415915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014901105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0294005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012167276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030883988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09835446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186127184","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v14i2.1817","title":"THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF WARRANTLESS SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIO","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pretoria Student Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitutionality; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Psychology; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.09316596242632554,"score_gpt":0.41426896489091636,"score_spread":0.32110300246459084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186127184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081897944,0.0032881356,0.026725497,0.019041823,0.000435732,0.00026440105,0.00067501335,0.00012541258,0.86754614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781058,0.0008426359,0.0041268244,0.003166212,0.00043062924,0.00026551177,0.0001245723,0.00003511673,0.0129026305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846326,0.003226674,0.0014058565,0.003067523,0.00518665,0.0024807288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96863794,0.017776808,0.003589782,0.0056421123,0.003341351,0.0010119778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01481557,0.00035959124,0.00079963316,0.0024630446,0.005339309,0.012763537,0.0024075222,0.0072158594,0.006674307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03294498,0.0006845604,0.0009963794,0.0023963682,0.031019257,0.010332247,0.0038663612,0.008245607,0.00089765445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004364387,0.0000051681395,0.0002410501,0.000010074528,0.0000030772026,0.000037625112,0.00020928601,0.00006736607,0.00006554762,0.99756795,0.00060737116,0.0011812515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036589674,0.00005175406,0.0026509517,0.00022720225,0.000048876318,0.00032269573,0.00095903256,0.0012056781,0.0006485551,0.94140905,0.052381646,0.00005806105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02384151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023795005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02384151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007222007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014147039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07835317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186149690","doi":"","title":"Nevsun, Atlantic Lottery, and the Implications of the 2020 Supreme Court of Canada Motion to Strike Decisions on Access to Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Plaintiff; Political science; Civil procedure; Supreme Court Decisions; Economic Justice; Common law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.025394997871988425,"score_gpt":0.3147616564819254,"score_spread":0.289366658609937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186149690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17722188,0.015460668,0.0024338271,0.18717448,0.0010357694,0.00012024322,0.0005868528,0.000053741438,0.61591256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130072,0.0031125566,0.0009810543,0.031143425,0.00024967184,0.000047313988,0.00010001099,0.000032797707,0.051325902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99094945,0.0008950961,0.00014019008,0.00062407175,0.0033450057,0.0040462245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433845,0.0021372347,0.00030689116,0.00013276777,0.0020742018,0.0010104646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004433559,0.00036086704,0.00050811603,0.0019565076,0.02828739,0.01352373,0.0024368567,0.0069556455,0.004531343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011250012,0.00048637827,0.00070615084,0.0020297735,0.023412678,0.002651034,0.0028967713,0.009272016,0.0002606731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003106634,0.000017863902,0.0023930355,0.000031432963,0.000013901706,0.00038717463,0.005396318,0.0005693188,0.00022458288,0.96765524,0.016588328,0.006691791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015695192,0.00010697406,0.049740113,0.0007919196,0.00019303687,0.00035488664,0.035072267,0.0034172495,0.0016670433,0.2753056,0.6326108,0.00058310264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17277044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17277044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18320827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.959469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186406658","doi":"","title":"The Dangers of Charter-Proofing the Toronto 18 Terrorism Prosecutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Terrorism; Legislature; History","score_opus":0.02350748093011518,"score_gpt":0.3225714292013905,"score_spread":0.2990639482712753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186406658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21489045,0.022454128,0.021627817,0.21851319,0.0049578333,0.0003737359,0.00037746658,0.0010152688,0.5157901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634931,0.0069972947,0.009397451,0.038585592,0.0012058489,0.00013065788,0.00013737509,0.00024142266,0.07981128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98475826,0.002377434,0.00057244464,0.0011052168,0.008517732,0.0026689987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776699,0.0114584835,0.002252293,0.0016914518,0.005601658,0.0013263373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009105872,0.00046498913,0.0004536056,0.0018895584,0.012716647,0.012261096,0.0019786053,0.0068436805,0.0048198947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029415464,0.00062427245,0.0007161386,0.00135894,0.010177043,0.004202064,0.0034379603,0.012635141,0.0012473345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006359571,0.00003933638,0.0047037527,0.00022510673,0.00003626347,0.0022705605,0.026923634,0.0026987123,0.002182004,0.731012,0.13075641,0.0990887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041840376,0.00019140152,0.013245193,0.0011657092,0.00007870474,0.0016012187,0.019937241,0.0039920574,0.0053532217,0.057931356,0.8961088,0.00035331564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34451973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4520543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65548027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027911836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037114862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6850288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190185424","doi":"","title":"Criminal Law & Digital Technologies: Drawing Lessons from the Canadian and American Experiences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Parliament; Legislature; Institution; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.024770566816783742,"score_gpt":0.3122259319741356,"score_spread":0.28745536515735187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190185424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4131449,0.010091611,0.0018895977,0.119780876,0.00059228245,0.0001124866,0.00047911392,0.00006016393,0.45384905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95278525,0.008603712,0.0008042572,0.008610693,0.00007811667,0.000046121593,0.00013824627,0.000062189174,0.028871477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98809904,0.0030806793,0.00024591232,0.0008797532,0.003954567,0.0037399905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98751557,0.0050018267,0.0005145566,0.00037927678,0.0034390776,0.0031496496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075237826,0.0007301143,0.0008170242,0.0048611294,0.06412167,0.022400487,0.00341007,0.0062673124,0.0080483705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016017178,0.0006072894,0.0005857825,0.0103747,0.043807283,0.008933724,0.009304517,0.008842405,0.00058956834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068369016,0.00008909087,0.0062924777,0.00013275704,0.000015861586,0.0010374573,0.73840135,0.00019485735,0.00022834683,0.20349577,0.022493243,0.027550371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014598962,0.000026919675,0.0062817037,0.00037556613,0.000028264953,0.0004437729,0.7154988,0.00017276924,0.00014921946,0.007422618,0.26948822,0.00009758186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15421508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15421508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1772457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98099065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190312094","doi":"","title":"Police Independence vs Military Discipline: Democratic Policing in the Canadian Forces","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Appeal; Parliament; Charter; Conviction; Democracy; Military justice; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03469928588067964,"score_gpt":0.3264900781105808,"score_spread":0.2917907922299011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190312094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24514474,0.0045016054,0.0025120405,0.11112285,0.000464968,0.00015455885,0.00029567597,0.00005685842,0.63574666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644121,0.0022661174,0.0011768308,0.0054727276,0.00010644548,0.000027577475,0.000074924326,0.000029140789,0.026434137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903155,0.0010224927,0.0001750764,0.00064384285,0.0035336094,0.00430948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99434644,0.0008349533,0.0006189423,0.0002469049,0.0019484153,0.0020043703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038371978,0.00043192744,0.00044432108,0.0031320192,0.041283235,0.008786207,0.0020363708,0.0024079196,0.0070966138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010600029,0.00057514646,0.00055012456,0.004697549,0.023574123,0.002444812,0.0058560786,0.0050915894,0.00036005315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014199903,0.000097758355,0.036021296,0.00018820609,0.000059477567,0.0007368384,0.10300056,0.001358676,0.00070396165,0.72849685,0.039723247,0.089471035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008694399,0.0000925664,0.212089,0.00066805625,0.00011190531,0.00033880636,0.13387607,0.0015071752,0.00068844215,0.06462324,0.58558846,0.00032931822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82450104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17549899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30065265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191397226","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Examination of Police Interrogation of Criminal Suspects in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, New Zealand, and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04300386071974556,"score_gpt":0.31496062095054483,"score_spread":0.2719567602307993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191397226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881523,0.00063995476,0.000083966865,0.0007520233,0.000016996593,0.00006143046,0.000065553744,0.0000026782102,0.01022518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592674,0.0012993303,0.0001720756,0.0003887336,0.000008187749,0.00004377196,0.00009557102,0.000007983251,0.0020577642],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931037,0.0023811562,0.0004088736,0.00034398364,0.0021910227,0.0015712086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98339224,0.005939514,0.0022339888,0.00051152246,0.0069770264,0.000945681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004771351,0.00023748669,0.00060453336,0.005979593,0.011863048,0.003404403,0.0010774421,0.0009274017,0.0011430363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031367995,0.0005909782,0.00022870547,0.009244754,0.007030532,0.0018762453,0.0049787085,0.0016667935,0.00013364844],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001380564,0.000071261486,0.061298907,0.00016692071,0.000040240975,0.0014120968,0.9133802,0.00007915297,0.0009663224,0.00247509,0.0013283158,0.018643413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060828056,0.00006568617,0.3580554,0.00017545217,0.000026833686,0.00037557338,0.62860286,0.00011985767,0.00030433922,0.000154919,0.01206526,0.00004773755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93011224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06988776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02276272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032397117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16515583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192292574","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11189","title":"The Role of Expert Evidence in the Defence of Provocation and Emotional Stress in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; CLARITY; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Liability; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04652257504750107,"score_gpt":0.31233174186825174,"score_spread":0.2658091668207507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192292574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14560433,0.0711491,0.007342435,0.6514909,0.001340213,0.00023852609,0.000041730415,0.000015395231,0.122777425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478993,0.015719127,0.0029666137,0.028356165,0.00068133074,0.000079285106,0.000008259168,0.000010339222,0.0042795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96726674,0.02050863,0.0032847035,0.0014241951,0.003843197,0.0036725395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84361595,0.13408709,0.008808154,0.002725874,0.0060976064,0.004665454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043447196,0.00038801893,0.00074599806,0.003928003,0.008225382,0.015809152,0.0022994145,0.014941533,0.0026824828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10129337,0.00086988154,0.0006966037,0.0017757431,0.03085213,0.011810355,0.013671264,0.011753349,0.00018341957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001305435,0.000061595616,0.007992269,0.0018653406,0.000072219176,0.01084974,0.079192124,0.0009356214,0.0020730605,0.80558336,0.0065409313,0.0847033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013362772,0.00028126387,0.023240993,0.015497429,0.00018440149,0.007089349,0.07492678,0.0016807755,0.00312877,0.62321496,0.25014752,0.0004740949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017394131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018910121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043447196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011173879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023667485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22977346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193835978","doi":"10.29173/mlj1204","title":"Involuntary Detention and Involuntary Treatment Through the Lens of Sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05638311809240237,"score_gpt":0.2618505486272782,"score_spread":0.20546743053487582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193835978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015175938,0.0126649,0.011196695,0.21145976,0.0034963957,0.00035300423,0.0023862352,0.00013625082,0.74313086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70231926,0.016810197,0.028891068,0.06776743,0.0031575048,0.00052753434,0.0018527774,0.0003318446,0.1783424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737058,0.005031604,0.0010093646,0.0022057982,0.011093994,0.0069534103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97815883,0.003919269,0.0008940595,0.0008907964,0.012151105,0.0039859423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013179323,0.00095982605,0.00091390504,0.0047231233,0.021287868,0.017719949,0.003604817,0.0076931636,0.0075516677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02607,0.0011199873,0.0012676959,0.004065712,0.03004637,0.0044534146,0.005329862,0.014967411,0.0006933536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010126735,0.00001123602,0.00088640954,0.000027322922,0.000010290092,0.000057837555,0.0031690644,0.00043700772,0.0000610456,0.94382435,0.045270372,0.0062348833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004071022,0.00002260991,0.011884082,0.0012411927,0.000074658004,0.000107794884,0.009528237,0.0012603562,0.00026833254,0.29812717,0.67721313,0.00023168935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18347578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18347578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52150625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94705236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197001350","doi":"","title":"Similar Fact Evidence & Crime Linkage Analysis: In Search of an Empirical Foundation to Support the Identity Inference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Foundation (evidence); Identity (music); Criminology; Empirical evidence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10207483421274736,"score_gpt":0.466844231543874,"score_spread":0.3647693973311266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197001350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61661094,0.005858445,0.27900353,0.026957002,0.00038444134,0.0018050091,0.0019912834,0.00017067161,0.06721864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93883383,0.0010310382,0.055263672,0.001531717,0.00021064573,0.00061493897,0.00057350524,0.000023279017,0.0019174227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9443218,0.04226749,0.001614786,0.0032022612,0.007486432,0.0011072562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75475645,0.19992621,0.017764403,0.013430558,0.012599959,0.0015224578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052203815,0.0005746577,0.0014252173,0.009908574,0.004088693,0.0040772045,0.0032757635,0.0025186492,0.008788325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22125414,0.00040486746,0.0017435704,0.0094026495,0.0073524043,0.0089606065,0.00567122,0.0039450866,0.00071404915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036480307,0.00064565503,0.31380567,0.0009513409,0.0017931843,0.0013354069,0.0052614193,0.0037152614,0.00018372576,0.5705744,0.006974208,0.09439502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044921797,0.0010189696,0.13708559,0.0023831113,0.0016365496,0.002364753,0.029265499,0.070157945,0.0020823872,0.69415504,0.059196603,0.00020441142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010003752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009871561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052203815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024504333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058878553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27608347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197232492","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice of Young People in Quebec and in Canada - General Observations and Basic Challenges (L’accès à la justice des jeunes au Québec et au Canada – grandes observations et enjeux de base)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Political science; Paternalism; Convention; Empowerment; Sociology; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Human rights; History; Art","score_opus":0.06904516779055446,"score_gpt":0.31292479091826664,"score_spread":0.24387962312771216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197232492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95679486,0.004605189,0.00016991378,0.01368338,0.00013595916,0.00009486293,0.0013483416,0.000019429102,0.023148099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821263,0.0020909517,0.0001278081,0.0017571177,0.000030950396,0.00003890225,0.00028562656,0.0000096218755,0.013532753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967906,0.00030843998,0.000071084156,0.00017165371,0.00049347174,0.0021647257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547464,0.0004495834,0.0003575266,0.00006948418,0.0016731777,0.0019755908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014778635,0.0003147043,0.0005342988,0.0024937964,0.020523585,0.003832629,0.0017822413,0.0016910125,0.0070766127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033610798,0.00038930238,0.0004111328,0.004391907,0.0043313066,0.0014825121,0.002678642,0.002578897,0.00035358555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012680901,0.00019294803,0.33700767,0.00039049087,0.00005610291,0.0048650354,0.5416477,0.00027534796,0.00066446845,0.01545709,0.036342837,0.06297349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009503401,0.000052021158,0.48423257,0.00050762837,0.000018912266,0.0005501081,0.4463319,0.00016594985,0.00014146442,0.00050742045,0.06740337,0.000079174584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99787295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99927956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09191204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09191204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08524008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66687167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197260318","doi":"","title":"Humorous Styles of Cause in In Rem Actions: A Comparison of Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Psychology; Political science; Law; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04464207755282544,"score_gpt":0.3305857353715567,"score_spread":0.28594365781873127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197260318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656584,0.00060936157,0.00010146906,0.0009944766,0.000021268483,0.000020940044,0.00038941216,0.0000070499746,0.032197535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693894,0.0005121043,0.000070428345,0.0001943104,0.000003246477,0.0000040305076,0.00016833557,0.000007274305,0.0021014411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837446,0.00016519948,0.00004667422,0.00011231448,0.0006079375,0.00069338724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967841,0.00040197963,0.0003800033,0.00009168872,0.0017163566,0.0006259379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008345895,0.00023211094,0.0003655428,0.0044266777,0.009343784,0.0036655036,0.0008729841,0.00052918936,0.0036818867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044012284,0.0002471664,0.00025772123,0.0070492215,0.0034321016,0.00080697093,0.0022600526,0.0009920171,0.00020800899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036111893,0.00012456227,0.45016646,0.0002469932,0.00015295055,0.0012820446,0.42636737,0.0003792927,0.0019393535,0.027066711,0.013747207,0.07816589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008364213,0.00002950263,0.6331733,0.0001855334,0.00004673622,0.00028159164,0.33604157,0.00023775446,0.0004864734,0.00049177144,0.028949998,0.00006740614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047402255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047402255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039845344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34392905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198677971","doi":"","title":"RACIAL PROFILING AND THE PERILS OF ANCILLARY POLICE POWERS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Harm; Distrust; Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Law; Accountability; Profiling (computer programming); Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.0399597694476228,"score_gpt":0.3306205285925329,"score_spread":0.2906607591449101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198677971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08226578,0.05695605,0.009178721,0.33326825,0.0025427085,0.0001857115,0.0003012714,0.0000681214,0.51523334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93009996,0.014760128,0.0032034141,0.037681144,0.0008411214,0.0000680728,0.00006686504,0.000031473555,0.013247786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95082414,0.014080324,0.0015019069,0.0028805758,0.024322934,0.006390084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94725573,0.025028873,0.006202545,0.0024860855,0.016230974,0.002795658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035358224,0.00039452218,0.0008298118,0.0055371993,0.01526279,0.012281718,0.0025245263,0.0038406167,0.0030147142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078585975,0.00065235194,0.0005263566,0.0040337364,0.021912144,0.0072086207,0.005566429,0.0071766307,0.00021992339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027073742,0.0000140561515,0.0051219556,0.00023236964,0.000028839147,0.0001445733,0.0038789152,0.00016635416,0.00019009877,0.9401002,0.010772793,0.039322753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009930416,0.000095820724,0.060762193,0.0051727253,0.0003564799,0.0004817459,0.012950064,0.0010746164,0.0016614599,0.39261195,0.52453536,0.00019822163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69024944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85601884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30975056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032150596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09823519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62314945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198821212","doi":"10.7202/1079765ar","title":"La « formule d’amendement constitutionnel » de la commission Pepin-Robarts : sa genèse, ses mérites et ce qu’il en reste aujourd’hui*","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin d histoire politique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02659669930789583,"score_gpt":0.31536297143297637,"score_spread":0.28876627212508055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198821212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037471123,0.01038699,0.043205608,0.08359947,0.002794681,0.0005011416,0.00034183395,0.00020858679,0.82149065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58338624,0.0038537171,0.03557994,0.03298761,0.0007478552,0.0006756615,0.00020360138,0.00021089175,0.3423545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786876,0.0067750136,0.0011841684,0.0026318515,0.00786361,0.0028578304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905697,0.0039522657,0.00078755134,0.0011661225,0.0029517873,0.0005726479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012661998,0.00051848555,0.00050600077,0.0010831279,0.0076189917,0.011027957,0.001939326,0.008759615,0.005057466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026567094,0.00088052364,0.000654129,0.0010490583,0.014325465,0.0052073714,0.0043409513,0.011080454,0.0015132336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019442608,0.000011137205,0.00032646727,0.000059764156,0.000006610713,0.000096374875,0.0048089977,0.00017354394,0.00047358862,0.9745069,0.0110131875,0.008503931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032646865,0.00007251456,0.0039255414,0.0005385886,0.000032681444,0.00023452229,0.0038521946,0.000668348,0.0019747787,0.12586308,0.8626344,0.00017071006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1596677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17666161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015219092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031355742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3174767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199003475","doi":"","title":"La valorisation des renseignements personnels au Québec et au Canada : la promesse des projets de loi no 64 et C-11","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03055051117052922,"score_gpt":0.2908561575292319,"score_spread":0.2603056463587027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199003475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79644823,0.0025367094,0.009699759,0.038410496,0.00057492,0.0011626813,0.0012578561,0.00025289014,0.14965644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86373407,0.0014371478,0.008076755,0.003810075,0.000054162283,0.00036704837,0.0005497059,0.00009222255,0.1218788],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902868,0.0019361959,0.0002444745,0.0008548552,0.0037395828,0.0029379514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718817,0.0032855524,0.001551215,0.0009316995,0.013735743,0.008614126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008740132,0.000410264,0.00037998322,0.0023425105,0.013186227,0.005803228,0.0018852232,0.0015899485,0.0075307293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015145891,0.00043832796,0.00051852287,0.0029882963,0.004631707,0.0015086196,0.0038255136,0.002949912,0.0007345925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042048597,0.0005237072,0.26279083,0.00087766617,0.00016157898,0.0012913819,0.22243978,0.0040026996,0.008415632,0.052085806,0.05123089,0.39575955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040994746,0.00043653583,0.49080256,0.00063924433,0.0000690643,0.00014406253,0.1687348,0.0015109377,0.0021610071,0.0022028254,0.3330322,0.00022578031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102215804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102215804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29465646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74163103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199135211","doi":"10.7202/1080618ar","title":"Hugues Parent et Julie Desrosiers, Traité de droit criminel, t. III « La peine », 3e éd., Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2020, 1 164 p., ISBN 978-2-89400-447-0.","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.020289873778138373,"score_gpt":0.2793832642507377,"score_spread":0.25909339047259927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199135211","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016393904,0.948812,0.00073196646,0.012447329,0.003933601,0.000017157618,0.0003113082,0.00008850489,0.033494223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044438937,0.84060794,0.0012121802,0.0038291684,0.0025267296,0.000057352136,0.00044888523,0.00015160955,0.14672227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987679,0.00026224862,0.0000725988,0.00012762891,0.00066952594,0.000100069745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885714,0.00051891425,0.00012881204,0.000040372677,0.00034683727,0.000107835454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012515504,0.0015921965,0.0009305226,0.0025255675,0.0014609179,0.0031815097,0.0014353825,0.00257277,0.054713223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034558154,0.0008404023,0.00047538098,0.0038495278,0.0016612667,0.0049352637,0.0011502294,0.002936783,0.02877728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020248905,0.0000100335565,0.00015386604,0.00094003626,0.00000975563,0.0000792237,0.00091400446,0.00004517812,0.000116440526,0.0069185016,0.8605971,0.13019574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035101596,0.0000052220485,0.0006199322,0.00059360365,0.0000043451173,0.0001936931,0.00035973234,0.00001694133,0.000069031994,0.0013352318,0.9967901,0.00000871169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10512077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18602851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8948792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004043263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006777373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20901781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199741977","doi":"","title":"La protection des sources journalistiques en droit civil québécois : une oeuvre inachevée","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025360657288765198,"score_gpt":0.2813458070264901,"score_spread":0.2559851497377249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199741977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36635804,0.04113234,0.009986418,0.25025287,0.0014101351,0.00039590386,0.0014243829,0.00016551588,0.3288744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87509185,0.009124959,0.00555335,0.013976772,0.0003882894,0.00015585369,0.00028665198,0.000050743984,0.0953715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99170977,0.0016649091,0.00028387917,0.0006967704,0.003900152,0.0017446367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97072214,0.011506279,0.0020582075,0.0016971567,0.011718297,0.0022980014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008841621,0.00044472405,0.0006137509,0.0038520375,0.011878767,0.010112172,0.001684188,0.0040649744,0.011292716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022435557,0.00048352216,0.000473355,0.0035396954,0.007326755,0.0037467608,0.0027118486,0.004168421,0.0007137858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002923224,0.00016592843,0.06467659,0.001446134,0.00020457394,0.0023149475,0.070648044,0.001038824,0.0061938534,0.5464898,0.07442883,0.2321003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009339314,0.00014886669,0.16543792,0.0025118378,0.0001596878,0.00064008724,0.027524408,0.0010335584,0.004219416,0.024835741,0.77316517,0.00022996357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.909773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9472806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09022701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048404638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09109975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35120183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200096151","doi":"","title":"At the Heart of Youth’s Access to Justice in the Child Welfare System: The Stakeholders Brought Together (Au cœur de l’accès à la justice des jeunes en protection de la jeunesse : les acteurs rassemblés)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Dialog box; Humanities; Child protection; Sociology; Library science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.08242002063319945,"score_gpt":0.3283807263137649,"score_spread":0.24596070568056547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200096151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94665885,0.0017577448,0.00076869316,0.022041624,0.00016763828,0.000077750694,0.00011973256,0.000017682127,0.028390385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937483,0.00052335416,0.00019298308,0.0009832259,0.000014894633,0.000034124794,0.00002346166,0.000008587153,0.0044710143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924744,0.0033566277,0.00011840088,0.0003010203,0.0006454966,0.0031040178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933583,0.002214221,0.0005042659,0.00015800881,0.0015369424,0.0022283061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005975895,0.0003983209,0.0005130852,0.0009487641,0.030767443,0.009647538,0.001465339,0.0020740742,0.0053750863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006695603,0.00036436645,0.000376998,0.0011651098,0.010434594,0.0034084336,0.00583311,0.004164563,0.00026231585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016690683,0.000026161299,0.0137629295,0.0000664795,0.000009244074,0.0010369453,0.9689432,0.00003392239,0.00032284946,0.0053907507,0.0026036266,0.007787269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016260672,0.000015829863,0.013108527,0.00017512449,0.000006847108,0.00013805638,0.9677605,0.0000371268,0.00011537011,0.00036480388,0.018263046,0.000013190144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74194276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8682201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25805724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028889861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04273791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51915395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200241596","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3785707","title":"Overdue Improvements Needed: Canada’s Public Sector Privacy Act (Submission to the Department of Justice, Canada)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Public sector; Law; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.021040072925508305,"score_gpt":0.2815215304382162,"score_spread":0.2604814575127079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200241596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008406539,0.0067178975,0.0007275877,0.90171677,0.026860245,0.00056581397,0.0043285596,0.00050753227,0.05016901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035418745,0.0031846743,0.0029876544,0.7922857,0.0036557624,0.00028351037,0.001200388,0.00026590037,0.16071767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9558618,0.0020085806,0.0023508186,0.002211011,0.023676746,0.013891056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93734336,0.008575843,0.0013224558,0.0016817581,0.031695325,0.019381357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019693557,0.0016897629,0.0026412408,0.0034596454,0.033200365,0.030788645,0.0083839735,0.088865295,0.013216415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057491727,0.0028757164,0.0035389792,0.0038075226,0.009363743,0.005269093,0.0063230977,0.045283005,0.003945647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045343986,0.00006502241,0.0013279082,0.00008377293,0.000035755354,0.00030113466,0.00093164254,0.00023927199,0.00027908658,0.011447729,0.9796498,0.0055934736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011768712,0.00004978968,0.020061383,0.00050398713,0.00012662946,0.00016042628,0.003162829,0.00060984894,0.0005296105,0.003918298,0.9704418,0.0003176289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98846054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99501956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13138148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6451396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95324385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200313530","doi":"","title":"Relocating Officially Induced Error of Law: Fitting the Remedy to the Wrong","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Ignorance; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Criminal law; Common law","score_opus":0.04459809228247275,"score_gpt":0.3503929474665618,"score_spread":0.30579485518408905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200313530","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11964008,0.002420253,0.35974455,0.22448866,0.0040243007,0.0002476426,0.00007152804,0.0011743145,0.2881887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93162864,0.0008830089,0.031152317,0.021541175,0.00082835346,0.0001412259,0.000030762774,0.0002487778,0.0135457255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96790296,0.012720598,0.0024529956,0.004626636,0.009190762,0.0031060725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95261794,0.017559366,0.005481129,0.015041077,0.007814755,0.0014856503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02833764,0.0005398824,0.00091402786,0.002078468,0.0070351143,0.012490581,0.004494583,0.018196147,0.003222558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10111259,0.00070628105,0.0011570873,0.0010395705,0.03739195,0.013906805,0.011003915,0.014777282,0.0009546753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015828608,0.000068377914,0.0019637705,0.00005662936,0.000020147349,0.000318139,0.0057389177,0.0006748826,0.00048359123,0.96555424,0.004371686,0.020733837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007330275,0.00018950326,0.0016107463,0.00080804306,0.000073644966,0.0009760664,0.006497433,0.00488655,0.0027184363,0.9067546,0.07529835,0.00011343482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006522305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073442445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02833764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034426963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018247515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14986557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200326481","doi":"","title":"The operation of the presumption of innocence and its role in bail proceedings under Canadian and South African law (Part 2)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Law; Presumption; Political science; Restitution; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.043317458131724745,"score_gpt":0.2571281629778647,"score_spread":0.21381070484613998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200326481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37569645,0.007134951,0.017705547,0.065703526,0.0003654544,0.00030643743,0.0003199057,0.00005267125,0.532715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893154,0.00060240395,0.0019867846,0.00087307265,0.000055035543,0.000046209083,0.0000068439263,0.000008262951,0.007105978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074626,0.0022229638,0.0003825395,0.00095179083,0.0027832282,0.0029132408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643447,0.025567401,0.0025999153,0.0012587281,0.0050630514,0.00116627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015426551,0.00034685325,0.00060859835,0.0020538638,0.008956284,0.0131872,0.002497849,0.0056363493,0.006770739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062362436,0.0008748927,0.00056510844,0.0019681174,0.038308047,0.0068449257,0.0030568314,0.005769979,0.0002678623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004335731,0.000012954556,0.0029182327,0.000042455296,0.000010184102,0.00015681375,0.0056310333,0.00030869848,0.00026385803,0.98354363,0.001438305,0.0056305444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007911236,0.00009407323,0.0285983,0.00038938646,0.00013230696,0.00044715733,0.013520623,0.005612922,0.0017417223,0.9138628,0.03534881,0.0001726981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71357906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76515496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28642094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033270106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05417745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57621545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200458124","doi":"","title":"5Q IA CLARTÉ PLUMCr Qc : cinq questions permettant d’appréhender l’usage d’intelligence artificielle pour accroître la clarté du plumitif criminel québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03425857703274676,"score_gpt":0.3228391989097632,"score_spread":0.28858062187701644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200458124","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08937689,0.007667994,0.41406506,0.070149496,0.0024284367,0.0012793856,0.0036505547,0.0061078817,0.40527436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4833192,0.005397185,0.21686932,0.008023206,0.00047090038,0.00050021906,0.0022202802,0.0014440841,0.28175554],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964567,0.0011669889,0.00018565479,0.00057310704,0.0013631803,0.0002542971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900892,0.0043907124,0.00059214944,0.00089676894,0.0037233916,0.00030773738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005431004,0.001033303,0.0005000812,0.0027135953,0.0043660076,0.009601541,0.0018305611,0.0049269274,0.0298988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017348273,0.00062417664,0.0008102024,0.0016758785,0.005871823,0.0074641546,0.0022628005,0.0028766955,0.0057348423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037153478,0.0001594602,0.023097541,0.0026041172,0.00013586905,0.0039912458,0.051952437,0.0071348767,0.030352583,0.34744498,0.1330934,0.39966205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023984227,0.00012433405,0.021414619,0.0015797138,0.000071551454,0.0014733478,0.030926256,0.015777212,0.014504876,0.051257793,0.8625834,0.00026285747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21134047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26299667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7886595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00848455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060608303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42022067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201141576","doi":"10.32920/24233095.v1","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Secret Law and the Special Advocate System in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Secrecy; National security; Law; Certificate; Political science; Security interest; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0209342376014512,"score_gpt":0.265503398194201,"score_spread":0.2445691605927498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201141576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3988825,0.006197288,0.0024606176,0.14878209,0.0009081072,0.0003503711,0.0004215918,0.00009493971,0.44190246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316805,0.002380081,0.0011323259,0.015304581,0.00007096771,0.00004783847,0.000083193016,0.000039082024,0.049261406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882869,0.0011648823,0.0002514662,0.0006992674,0.0035654271,0.006032102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876956,0.0030641893,0.00084145117,0.00035563935,0.0036079763,0.0044351467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043667085,0.00038749145,0.00047314411,0.0022603183,0.05003927,0.014762475,0.0037056664,0.006080043,0.008148822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014196316,0.0006972326,0.0007002839,0.0046540676,0.016706841,0.003477472,0.007142586,0.009461497,0.00039053013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007197823,0.000101657475,0.019854613,0.00017554521,0.000040590363,0.0033913292,0.08100707,0.0007294211,0.00053900905,0.790451,0.069734745,0.033903114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009294355,0.000063735315,0.060148384,0.000848062,0.00015672913,0.00092487835,0.2870349,0.0023721047,0.000975421,0.039459236,0.60757834,0.00034536768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99664825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20524597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20524597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36424047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92180204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201541166","doi":"","title":"Revue des décisions marquantes de l’année 2020 en matière de vie privée et de protection des renseignements personnels","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0501760318816469,"score_gpt":0.3115207963325583,"score_spread":0.2613447644509114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201541166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22465563,0.029082388,0.0063510416,0.16853508,0.0035360907,0.00035827304,0.00080213434,0.00009973906,0.56657964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8465158,0.010038956,0.0029290225,0.026391923,0.0009305981,0.00019219323,0.00024267989,0.00006287297,0.112696014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751834,0.005738542,0.001356115,0.0020634749,0.0101946695,0.0054638432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595144,0.023106646,0.0031836743,0.0014460259,0.009966871,0.002782494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020904332,0.00031594103,0.00046915334,0.002523351,0.0081475,0.012453664,0.001805236,0.007771662,0.005917722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050446704,0.000672267,0.00070826575,0.0015565663,0.007656736,0.004477831,0.0035057152,0.008058949,0.00087161723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001950162,0.00012939454,0.018031785,0.00045286654,0.000063176296,0.0018834303,0.03768536,0.0013573559,0.0020117126,0.7924175,0.07008248,0.07568993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030226698,0.00018216466,0.047597148,0.0021059015,0.00007008735,0.0004958327,0.025769752,0.000713839,0.0028843288,0.029169384,0.89078426,0.00019713627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29362458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3754495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29362458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023938246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057063263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58383095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202738108","doi":"10.3917/cdlj.2102.0269","title":"France / États-Unis, deux réponses au terrorisme","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de la Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018762274956384026,"score_gpt":0.3113504354019693,"score_spread":0.2925881604455853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202738108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12986606,0.017595856,0.0039757574,0.038218774,0.0036438587,0.00019333903,0.008796817,0.0007780618,0.79693145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38547975,0.0039122407,0.0024499248,0.0077833063,0.0006890513,0.00015030011,0.003260496,0.0002690697,0.5960059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618345,0.0009898181,0.00014081754,0.0006856155,0.0010460616,0.0009541127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979475,0.00050791766,0.00028464085,0.00016243114,0.0007091968,0.00038831655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025050556,0.00078449136,0.00043486446,0.0020137979,0.0057769725,0.006004606,0.0005799148,0.002356386,0.06445883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040770634,0.0003360736,0.0007873864,0.0024308735,0.0019479358,0.0016982163,0.0021019212,0.002547297,0.0075132623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067369826,0.00018196472,0.034307126,0.0005411552,0.00019950059,0.0015600134,0.012714457,0.0015061027,0.0026451673,0.4414964,0.3009379,0.20323654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039242906,0.000052826443,0.039399814,0.0001055489,0.000019830291,0.00019764315,0.001990465,0.00013511552,0.00048109598,0.00209055,0.9554457,0.000042097996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34013057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31576332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34013057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014965969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010095456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6763016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202818119","doi":"","title":"Saskatoon charging and disposition patterns under section 213 of the Criminal Code of Canada .","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Disposition; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Criminal law; Psychology; Programming language; Operating system; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019383183411572285,"score_gpt":0.2882874916357407,"score_spread":0.2689043082241684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202818119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9493203,0.000602391,0.00017976864,0.002037845,0.00007376382,0.000111148714,0.030371172,0.00001968757,0.017283995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750447,0.0008389789,0.00022255312,0.0005699814,0.000012821187,0.00005952108,0.007814678,0.000025208677,0.015411492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870527,0.00017663186,0.00009186071,0.00014185206,0.00025830136,0.000625994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207824,0.00091618265,0.0022002775,0.00037086438,0.003028479,0.0014058655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006483924,0.00024365855,0.0002962431,0.0021506667,0.0027479003,0.0013288416,0.001330408,0.0007031883,0.013098199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069164163,0.000431612,0.0004127511,0.0063533364,0.00065336365,0.00063843315,0.0011324784,0.0016051022,0.0012710493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018765047,0.000062313804,0.9659724,0.00003404984,0.000065417014,0.00014241684,0.0012063034,0.00019053883,0.00010116372,0.0011909752,0.02233235,0.008514341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015337837,0.000014710806,0.9909793,0.00007573749,0.000034107496,0.000067519184,0.004270864,0.0003283298,0.00008029343,0.00029073269,0.0038250457,0.000018026085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015917897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013721571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03649731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0995574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203526704","doi":"","title":"The Boundaries of Judicial Review Since Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Wall","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Ambiguity; Political science; Criticism; Judicial review; High Court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017249331416854547,"score_gpt":0.3126693933389262,"score_spread":0.29542006192207165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203526704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12981777,0.043759458,0.0069209407,0.48063472,0.00498212,0.00030700376,0.00033400572,0.00011551188,0.33312854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647577,0.004451743,0.0034237606,0.099085845,0.0015373371,0.00018334715,0.00011723054,0.00008349032,0.0263596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95084107,0.015381903,0.0029300686,0.006085039,0.0142126335,0.010549258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8884042,0.059583627,0.0071098995,0.006186423,0.0281961,0.010519788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0442661,0.0002444567,0.0006197852,0.0018658707,0.016383026,0.021392595,0.002642095,0.012802873,0.0014933747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1103521,0.0011537595,0.0006957345,0.001506312,0.021456745,0.008501361,0.0064922757,0.019484023,0.00036100004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014767557,0.00004980808,0.0074245967,0.00023127116,0.00005996404,0.0009771447,0.021106428,0.00048573862,0.0013367396,0.82242703,0.08797671,0.057776846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012022867,0.00017497475,0.046887185,0.002432302,0.00012877304,0.0006610122,0.019937431,0.0007266712,0.003309046,0.09549208,0.8296647,0.0004655987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2956496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5736584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2956496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040895972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07651671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5878574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203861865","doi":"10.29173/wclawr56","title":"Causes of Wrongful Conviction and the Challenges Involved in Convincing Courts to Reopen Cases of Wrongful Conviction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08898005804125378,"score_gpt":0.3540589190423354,"score_spread":0.2650788610010816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203861865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012107546,0.34983695,0.005075597,0.56103766,0.007182469,0.00010306067,0.00018934955,0.000026359274,0.06444101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5291639,0.34449327,0.004819325,0.0972252,0.010920226,0.00033291054,0.00023112076,0.00007877212,0.012735195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96018934,0.022570215,0.0030767147,0.0023999957,0.009057917,0.0027057743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75583667,0.19134991,0.018196072,0.0041426304,0.027903955,0.0025707902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054893956,0.000485966,0.001509274,0.008749998,0.004276939,0.012608844,0.0028539193,0.014527992,0.0044206902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21191865,0.0009856307,0.0015798031,0.0034624492,0.01568969,0.0110423975,0.0038215162,0.013104266,0.00051738514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008937998,0.00012205544,0.017187826,0.0029339022,0.00033493288,0.001413087,0.0036573254,0.00093848107,0.00010164616,0.7123358,0.10681164,0.15407391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006779816,0.000099510966,0.023167271,0.028174656,0.0004501258,0.0020581922,0.018484693,0.0016676281,0.00046758744,0.6880604,0.23712513,0.00017709442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020155355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0627205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054893956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010458407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02421461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29031044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204229003","doi":"","title":"The Difficult Road to Accountability: A Study on Complaints Mechanisms to Investigate and Address Victims’ Rights Violations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Criminal justice; Political science; Law enforcement; Economic Justice; Human rights; Criminology; Empirical research; Public relations; Law; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04114426501647765,"score_gpt":0.3612321858558445,"score_spread":0.3200879208393668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204229003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96104914,0.00038076687,0.0012526381,0.008825405,0.000050783103,0.00035885398,0.00009048769,0.000020532205,0.027971389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99060994,0.00031667843,0.00075604033,0.0018374233,0.000024937875,0.00017543705,0.000035596608,0.000018986993,0.0062248325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.978789,0.011520035,0.0006447005,0.0010501448,0.003602008,0.004394145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553558,0.025197867,0.007041194,0.002200808,0.007355452,0.00284891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021577993,0.00034508161,0.0007062373,0.0033911916,0.021837285,0.008012361,0.0036790033,0.0029259054,0.004614487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050407518,0.00062641565,0.0003834151,0.004662287,0.0131414095,0.005711827,0.0048899767,0.0046334905,0.00044286688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033694305,0.0006217183,0.043394454,0.00015400177,0.000012650038,0.0006445348,0.90879434,0.000080493046,0.00036955473,0.019094018,0.0039714114,0.022829104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019710742,0.000103195685,0.04915537,0.00023664319,0.000024282137,0.00014995264,0.9201861,0.00030395936,0.00021843964,0.0012444151,0.028323032,0.000034995133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75372756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86565876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75372756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0483729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08360764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49544555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205870016","doi":"10.26108/0tfs-g965","title":"Has the application of section 217.1 of the Criminal Code succeeded in remedying the deficiencies in Canadian criminal law at the time of the Westray disaster?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AcadiaU-DEV","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Criminal code; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Criminal investigation; Criminal procedure; Computer science","score_opus":0.05709864995360307,"score_gpt":0.29449737465743087,"score_spread":0.23739872470382778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205870016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4484955,0.025382023,0.0017894305,0.23202002,0.001957461,0.0002972982,0.0021805456,0.000041636304,0.28783613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922875,0.019015752,0.0013700981,0.033733327,0.00082860584,0.0000619762,0.00106752,0.000027398706,0.021020245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763649,0.0018376028,0.00061412406,0.0014346719,0.011920608,0.007828167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95678854,0.0127413785,0.010313511,0.0009744686,0.017281964,0.0019001598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144210495,0.00041881725,0.0006573159,0.003826141,0.0092923185,0.015344628,0.0036618395,0.007190101,0.0035455076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06636514,0.00053007837,0.00086697005,0.007936053,0.015162843,0.00542023,0.0020759148,0.003887908,0.00085143704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026494713,0.00029628462,0.3287784,0.0010962219,0.00040311462,0.0021926723,0.02552426,0.0012445559,0.0007683913,0.4382438,0.10002437,0.10116304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005731722,0.0003281866,0.5444851,0.0022581075,0.00072902296,0.0008506978,0.09252043,0.001740745,0.0022952035,0.018410593,0.33590427,0.0004202956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96173716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083290994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083290994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14528276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6043213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205894304","doi":"10.7202/1092012ar","title":"Why De Minimis is a Defence: A Reply to Professor Coughlan","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Supreme court; Statutory law; Harm; Legislature; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054853185311162345,"score_gpt":0.35023954790170503,"score_spread":0.2953863625905427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205894304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008679776,0.0018943798,0.00007031403,0.9957262,0.0017622445,0.0000012421531,0.0000041665944,0.0000032255523,0.00045144698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004118256,0.0022571227,0.0002787799,0.98182917,0.009403843,0.000016491747,0.0000068867535,0.000022584649,0.0020669503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384166,0.0057470324,0.0013002416,0.0031931126,0.0046084644,0.0013094998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90007925,0.079069525,0.0026418576,0.0020942618,0.011956223,0.0041589215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027135242,0.0008654927,0.0023455177,0.0016023536,0.008011691,0.008814308,0.0075528976,0.056257,0.005973304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08454947,0.0010876677,0.0016726579,0.0015895367,0.033990715,0.026080487,0.005774525,0.11808083,0.0028741318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027373326,0.000022777802,0.0002314088,0.00011747971,0.00001354667,0.00030984383,0.0014503078,0.000055747132,0.00007949718,0.073146604,0.9169132,0.0076321373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006369783,0.000050599854,0.0007050253,0.00093605503,0.000023897963,0.0013126725,0.0043172245,0.00038407085,0.00031404852,0.1267291,0.86500186,0.00016172245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017237406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022050211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008763686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013589997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14350659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206254426","doi":"","title":"L'évolution et la structuration des principes directeurs de la procédure civile du Québec, 1867-2016","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.008327271605339583,"score_gpt":0.22452403650902222,"score_spread":0.21619676490368264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206254426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37610587,0.014759255,0.009858599,0.045895673,0.0013990576,0.00023765588,0.003126339,0.00022082769,0.5483967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7642427,0.0041409926,0.0028563733,0.0016584303,0.000073006995,0.000083520565,0.00051045045,0.00008149895,0.22635302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976508,0.00041131923,0.00007390939,0.00027063637,0.0010181555,0.00057525537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610883,0.00052695477,0.00024022674,0.00015078363,0.0022859625,0.000687273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021389176,0.00030801079,0.00026745093,0.0012899621,0.008343109,0.0038614757,0.0008336608,0.0012306272,0.013911698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003965629,0.0002885349,0.00035648077,0.0017609306,0.008829789,0.0011721579,0.0015800707,0.0026412872,0.0009836059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007960988,0.00006807076,0.038594645,0.0004156222,0.00005307528,0.00045474715,0.14049613,0.0018931624,0.0019306756,0.5921626,0.08235952,0.14149216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009373497,0.000027444037,0.09095634,0.0003727951,0.000016649603,0.00009548165,0.019024739,0.00052032096,0.00075350935,0.0043666917,0.88376963,0.000087044544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99325424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10846546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10846546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11412528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7869757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206310714","doi":"","title":"Three Strikes and the Interpretative Obligation: Parliamentary Intention and the Ascription of Meaning under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Law; Statutory law; Bill of rights; Statute; Appeal; Political science; Parliament; Legislature; Obligation; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislative history; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.021201402470366,"score_gpt":0.2766731578535902,"score_spread":0.2554717553832242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206310714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15331905,0.0025627934,0.01844201,0.057007656,0.0006339848,0.000101442456,0.00011367139,0.000049885857,0.7677695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97531086,0.0007963018,0.0036943445,0.0026974804,0.00017670619,0.00007356536,0.000037644415,0.000043077544,0.017169915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595804,0.0067612776,0.0006808204,0.0009190396,0.004302872,0.0013780325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925558,0.004615898,0.0010773796,0.0006565828,0.00085149263,0.0002429718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008289246,0.00030843008,0.0004283097,0.0011048901,0.005496211,0.01160499,0.0015257326,0.007363814,0.0027094383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021465328,0.000656491,0.000478497,0.0010197418,0.037630647,0.008540668,0.004727243,0.011569835,0.00044139472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009290073,0.0000058807277,0.0001875198,0.000011198039,0.0000011565999,0.00011715792,0.009871239,0.000061093204,0.000112454545,0.9866968,0.00085409795,0.0020720568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052980966,0.00004987726,0.005234288,0.00042720564,0.000030136043,0.0002827885,0.013223661,0.0018260576,0.0011131532,0.8603009,0.11735657,0.00010253434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09204069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09040832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09204069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132930875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013207768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18300992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207397342","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3600350","title":"Le juge et la victime dans le cadre du processus de détermination de la peine (The Judge and the Victim in the Sentencing Process)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0042483526869631005,"score_gpt":0.2818092915531747,"score_spread":0.2775609388662116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207397342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6912525,0.0056412835,0.029010365,0.050238095,0.0009809384,0.00025579805,0.00007942294,0.00009065118,0.22245097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656694,0.0014105455,0.0033188076,0.0008910566,0.00013476789,0.000066157394,0.00001510588,0.00002254628,0.028471546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99098927,0.00619422,0.00020921016,0.0005237625,0.0011150324,0.000968495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956845,0.002544489,0.0005345168,0.00018785491,0.00046183556,0.0005868263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00871554,0.00036530173,0.00051991333,0.0014531824,0.009687123,0.010828256,0.00088799145,0.004475927,0.0047351127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023035781,0.00045835503,0.00034479206,0.00068995304,0.011293306,0.004569043,0.0062390203,0.006226814,0.00074528536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018673758,0.0002075815,0.01970509,0.0001331952,0.00004487523,0.012782324,0.20010382,0.00050866615,0.0013066862,0.6986865,0.007255471,0.059079133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060397313,0.00067552656,0.050865006,0.0009693281,0.0001288965,0.024106417,0.39279592,0.0024744493,0.0051515275,0.23057479,0.29197428,0.00022343427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009239226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010800272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010828256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023489536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007649876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04609275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209671816","doi":"","title":"‘Mr. Big’ Under Scrutiny: The Right to Silence and Elicited Undercover Confession Evidence in New Zealand","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Suspect; Scrutiny; Appeal; Officer; Law; Silence; Criminology; Political science; High Court; Psychology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07516981061061166,"score_gpt":0.3534094327763857,"score_spread":0.278239622165774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209671816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4859268,0.005270207,0.0036996154,0.24325527,0.0010605566,0.0003654509,0.0001874964,0.0000399717,0.26019457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9352424,0.0022799533,0.002981882,0.034480438,0.00025829737,0.00012349707,0.000049422084,0.000041297913,0.024542885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99068016,0.0028400621,0.0009700007,0.0014801736,0.0028017354,0.0012277777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855758,0.008379199,0.0015323155,0.0012485987,0.002012524,0.0012516101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013001562,0.00027394778,0.00046040045,0.00084469956,0.0104304785,0.007578414,0.0017870928,0.007075591,0.004367656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050346114,0.0007016938,0.000463141,0.0007291909,0.015450693,0.0048176404,0.005705112,0.0108205415,0.0003689447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046332733,0.00011722818,0.027026443,0.0007391377,0.00009487933,0.048577026,0.4459838,0.00023604838,0.009722802,0.33043075,0.04543155,0.09117707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002225052,0.00048250795,0.09108621,0.003116041,0.0002543795,0.027886119,0.20197475,0.00084522465,0.0037763796,0.0716179,0.59812504,0.00061290007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45629135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64891475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45629135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008675928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020230357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90727085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209721665","doi":"","title":"Enforcing American Letters of Request: The Fickle Charter Guarantee of Evidentiary Immunity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer security; Computer science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.029740365611308998,"score_gpt":0.3185562827631956,"score_spread":0.2888159171518866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209721665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048591845,0.0026329553,0.047601003,0.091705285,0.0015147437,0.00018564826,0.00028610977,0.00034247557,0.80713993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88307804,0.0016695,0.026868425,0.025522495,0.00083751854,0.00016841455,0.00010853293,0.00012656227,0.06162049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802036,0.0044913637,0.0010935001,0.0022880214,0.008596948,0.003326625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967457,0.01758365,0.0021042905,0.0044127847,0.0071686506,0.0012735871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012537167,0.00032334152,0.0008204835,0.0012449168,0.0075088968,0.009676812,0.0017548533,0.010369072,0.009289772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062461294,0.00055688637,0.00052749045,0.0011527917,0.013901281,0.006892552,0.0039035976,0.008924929,0.0020973433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025221347,0.000015926698,0.0003429696,0.000023890732,0.0000028975094,0.00011585665,0.0010685294,0.00017720246,0.00019313928,0.97428244,0.009297974,0.014453923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010355653,0.00007870227,0.0027167348,0.00045096944,0.000041619824,0.00044707183,0.001565119,0.0025427416,0.002048709,0.69288933,0.29696867,0.0001467241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09927853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13030466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09927853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071545397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026134763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19740134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209828805","doi":"","title":"Misspent Youth: The (Mis)application of the Youth Criminal Justice Act by the Criminal Code Review Boards of British Columbia and Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal code; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06440637157402879,"score_gpt":0.33003962505944456,"score_spread":0.2656332534854158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209828805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05313923,0.17676339,0.0011788193,0.62225705,0.01476184,0.0011135379,0.004164459,0.00034947853,0.1262723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43377763,0.12331663,0.0061727264,0.264642,0.0055881753,0.000897812,0.0034555197,0.00028822137,0.16186126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621704,0.0040501063,0.0033094469,0.0014406543,0.025154792,0.003874613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8743737,0.028750224,0.010592874,0.002461117,0.07274395,0.011078244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029616604,0.00045297408,0.00080865674,0.006648282,0.009102469,0.0088503705,0.0035785458,0.009139718,0.0028487782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0873581,0.0013242338,0.00061558094,0.0055724164,0.005426164,0.0019998222,0.0028276986,0.006031058,0.0007064086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108165426,0.00006150884,0.030712094,0.0014742694,0.000111470465,0.00035691922,0.005583169,0.00023906156,0.00044926885,0.015606028,0.81711906,0.12817898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008041033,0.00006782953,0.18506573,0.0048680324,0.00027119342,0.00016787073,0.005087038,0.00041374154,0.00058671815,0.0011639278,0.8020739,0.00015355357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085316926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085316926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3650594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6190205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210365955","doi":"","title":"Accommodating the Unknown: Balancing Employee Human Rights with the Employer Duty to Ensure Safety: A Dialogue on Stewart v Elk Valley and the Cannabis Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Adjudication; Supreme court; Prima facie; Law; Legalization; Political science; Jurisprudence; Corporation; Reasonable suspicion","score_opus":0.017024600603596885,"score_gpt":0.27782303039138534,"score_spread":0.26079842978778844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210365955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08714719,0.009971531,0.004298644,0.71528673,0.0011968873,0.000077259974,0.000079021724,0.00002446308,0.18191831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8073862,0.0039376225,0.0015779242,0.15844181,0.0006355703,0.000042119045,0.000023972038,0.00003757402,0.027917327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806506,0.0060878387,0.00036449483,0.0015178714,0.0059842914,0.00539489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819104,0.013946452,0.00050793187,0.00036953803,0.0019582475,0.0013074181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016195228,0.00044397093,0.00081420137,0.0012044826,0.036918744,0.019479422,0.00414496,0.026311798,0.0022071935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017925058,0.00057644333,0.0007713197,0.0012098505,0.06586635,0.006780694,0.0065002097,0.023299139,0.00028873744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001882811,0.000020845748,0.000858274,0.000044153094,0.000010943781,0.001114698,0.057079356,0.0003098961,0.00031011607,0.91595,0.018852146,0.005430696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007294749,0.00006593489,0.003814774,0.0014381787,0.000061458246,0.00053580693,0.13575594,0.0012399107,0.0014349361,0.31435716,0.5409493,0.0002737135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8996846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93652856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10031539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071098134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14278357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5158555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211161288","doi":"","title":"Can PIPEDA ‘Face’ the Challenge? An Analysis of the Adequacy of Canada’s Private Sector Privacy Legislation against Facial Recognition Technology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Face (sociological concept); Business; Private sector; Internet privacy; Facial recognition system; Computer security; Law; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.044178919319240104,"score_gpt":0.2799029223704864,"score_spread":0.2357240030512463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211161288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18660726,0.0065546557,0.007216216,0.42291078,0.0011730632,0.00042370154,0.0019360334,0.0002802341,0.37289804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8230955,0.0055067595,0.004538084,0.09564695,0.00026298416,0.00016516527,0.000833537,0.00016919884,0.06978193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9566613,0.003281327,0.00067666784,0.002127533,0.027297264,0.009955873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481915,0.012106001,0.0025678854,0.002205369,0.030189723,0.0047394587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015553524,0.00033825744,0.00060499733,0.0028683464,0.018052148,0.01650244,0.0039339624,0.005366584,0.005504563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0561944,0.0005969159,0.0010329743,0.004674482,0.010535104,0.006308829,0.003693432,0.0072809807,0.0008116567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001641619,0.00014011093,0.06163747,0.00033897682,0.000071848466,0.0012439948,0.02374895,0.0014562745,0.0011769295,0.60775906,0.20132354,0.10093871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053596515,0.00011265066,0.13529725,0.001119061,0.00014688395,0.0005026193,0.048198566,0.0025139023,0.0015139813,0.02852671,0.7816804,0.00033442877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90689695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09310305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2236459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6755131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212222693","doi":"","title":"Litigating Informer Privilege Under Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act: A Critique of R. v. Basi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Law; Legislative history; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Section (typography); Jurisdiction; Statutory interpretation; Legislature; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; History","score_opus":0.023604098534780658,"score_gpt":0.30557749772724135,"score_spread":0.28197339919246067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212222693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027175553,0.011282762,0.008883339,0.640379,0.0018175032,0.00027712758,0.00054318976,0.00029513528,0.30934638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50733507,0.0069046463,0.00951262,0.4027773,0.0013218491,0.00028990384,0.00018425193,0.00022289703,0.07145152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94931597,0.0052102366,0.0014800525,0.0036502515,0.030650388,0.009693133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945435,0.015279912,0.0013868572,0.0012148141,0.010479221,0.0021848571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020328458,0.0008682023,0.0013428931,0.0034692544,0.026144477,0.020364234,0.008459726,0.026894804,0.0022108876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038533427,0.0015747164,0.0016879966,0.0036165891,0.03547563,0.0047273976,0.004459819,0.030394198,0.000775877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019335355,0.000009454833,0.00056043896,0.00006299974,0.000017959153,0.0002943529,0.0062936754,0.00033864743,0.00027394068,0.92255104,0.06412511,0.005452914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010057371,0.00005851505,0.0051132715,0.0008664913,0.00020281081,0.00035257908,0.0093058515,0.0028634286,0.0020597759,0.191593,0.7870196,0.0004641965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97110295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1252111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1252111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24159098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9084744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214089832","doi":"10.7202/1107728ar","title":"INTEGRITY, DIGNITY AND THE ACT RESPECTING INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES: CAN THE ACT PROVIDE MORE APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT VICTIMS?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Harassment; Compensation (psychology); Damages; Law; Political science; Commission; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037141312389285794,"score_gpt":0.29158519994193005,"score_spread":0.25444388755264424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214089832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03030334,0.10604331,0.0016416729,0.7402562,0.004245419,0.00007174739,0.00014505346,0.000019416138,0.1172738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.728384,0.104873426,0.0030436679,0.113683216,0.0043042474,0.00012285671,0.00017977406,0.000029125034,0.04537958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98906237,0.004546023,0.001164378,0.0004447273,0.0033104483,0.0014720052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97986174,0.0113153225,0.0036712338,0.00089288014,0.0023454365,0.0019134938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009833355,0.00031720774,0.00087835576,0.0012336757,0.0037532735,0.006570487,0.0012060485,0.0115889795,0.007916027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047561023,0.00027642027,0.00044568192,0.0010781336,0.016217045,0.0058648163,0.0049524438,0.0067497226,0.001079322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027532192,0.00017020784,0.017434802,0.0015570822,0.0001135298,0.0028473178,0.026590196,0.00026008105,0.00077455305,0.58046997,0.1404236,0.22908339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013368716,0.00036342852,0.05532512,0.008918545,0.0001809448,0.004964273,0.036289286,0.00026559044,0.0017914316,0.20954496,0.6819601,0.0002626397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02336521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042367548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005554751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017905114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052004337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214689974","doi":"","title":"Paroles de déraison et paroles de dérision : les excès de langage à l’épreuve du droit criminel canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1588344370771158,"score_gpt":0.365102848786491,"score_spread":0.2062684117093752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214689974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896709,0.008878397,0.014087812,0.08223208,0.0023520475,0.00036975156,0.0009288951,0.00020945942,0.10127071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95200884,0.0021743928,0.0050749304,0.0039070006,0.0007582876,0.0003829047,0.00031092012,0.0000959672,0.035286747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97844875,0.011230798,0.0012449226,0.0011346646,0.005256675,0.002684267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89919025,0.07842954,0.0060575344,0.0034465943,0.0085299555,0.0043461304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01880341,0.00058742793,0.0007531242,0.0020928623,0.004936629,0.004908253,0.0017702896,0.0075637745,0.009420253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12673624,0.00066831335,0.00089737313,0.0012274629,0.003753439,0.005291971,0.0031685818,0.009457931,0.0018552401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029096073,0.001582374,0.124942854,0.0007787667,0.0002366071,0.014763703,0.07790553,0.0026789836,0.0067640003,0.36444917,0.074661486,0.32832694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004425751,0.001734768,0.35654217,0.0029000146,0.0003149801,0.012116172,0.08738072,0.008132964,0.012764782,0.08039073,0.43662426,0.0006558754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0298765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03801471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058018225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008575604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09944308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214765505","doi":"","title":"Section 24(2) in the Trial Courts: An Empirical Analysis of the Legal and Non-legal Determinants of Excluding Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Nova scotia; Law; Political science; Ideology; Empirical evidence; Criminal trial; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06111297904677972,"score_gpt":0.3466347057576162,"score_spread":0.2855217267108365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214765505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97731453,0.001649078,0.00018622058,0.003457551,0.000051736053,0.000099721954,0.0025214187,0.000011490164,0.014708337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950051,0.0007555848,0.00016133267,0.00039466858,0.000018196512,0.000017645629,0.00091658597,0.000010143745,0.0027207888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896164,0.0010874983,0.0006556849,0.0010972124,0.0047541233,0.0034438034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480382,0.010982735,0.01334506,0.0012927527,0.0149662625,0.011374998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055554756,0.00026014948,0.0007725246,0.003076547,0.009374643,0.0055351807,0.0025930603,0.0013080119,0.0045288187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038231276,0.00045649122,0.0006271208,0.008002082,0.0033468667,0.0010066964,0.0023639828,0.003271623,0.0005398127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002501497,0.00016330041,0.95287377,0.00014451411,0.00011651559,0.00083370105,0.009206772,0.0007617084,0.0003064851,0.003453463,0.013888877,0.01800077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028973385,0.000035924546,0.9763332,0.00019035736,0.00006189915,0.00016709884,0.010851606,0.0008489954,0.0001569389,0.0004885689,0.010787241,0.000049295122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05587461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106818914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40540057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214953611","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Law Journal Criminal Law Edition (Robson Crim) 41(4) 2018","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06552420480471455,"score_gpt":0.3225223531526971,"score_spread":0.25699814834798257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214953611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038485136,0.010405214,0.00055987993,0.07277284,0.005348792,0.0005268903,0.01139853,0.0006439175,0.8598588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02326923,0.0033102487,0.00052560226,0.0063416557,0.00035606112,0.000099607045,0.0013013919,0.00011142977,0.96468484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989716,0.000068683905,0.000058581845,0.00011275288,0.0004723244,0.00031610928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959857,0.00045757825,0.00016683833,0.00021284053,0.0023631013,0.0008139582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010524316,0.0007566322,0.0004947272,0.0037307965,0.014306053,0.007304026,0.0018996792,0.0038104465,0.2429801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004251877,0.0012369066,0.00040750514,0.0031771148,0.0019308535,0.0014943349,0.0027430465,0.0034934313,0.04838394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003341846,0.00012301523,0.008968439,0.00017108773,0.00001536401,0.00041359998,0.0010279361,0.000056425095,0.00048116868,0.011690431,0.9371582,0.039860863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023324466,0.000020135807,0.025666308,0.00036719217,0.000031517997,0.00017997687,0.0028773719,0.00013472601,0.00050577,0.0013373463,0.968827,0.000029354424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8118052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9557465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2429801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016945055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07175918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8128494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215317100","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v1i1.134","title":"Privatization of Law Enforcement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Accountability; Discretion; Law enforcement; Community policing; Public administration; Democracy; Enforcement; Political science; Police brutality; Public relations; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.24856146540022492,"score_gpt":0.47811207115600374,"score_spread":0.22955060575577882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215317100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058617074,0.003882299,0.032303862,0.07258679,0.0015508691,0.00049102114,0.0007385384,0.0015409243,0.8282887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.735763,0.0021831673,0.006281364,0.014462388,0.0012372194,0.0004088402,0.000512511,0.0002527625,0.23889863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921003,0.001482159,0.0003491773,0.0020417748,0.0022670848,0.0017595829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988279,0.00260109,0.0015731913,0.0036200986,0.002644881,0.0012817819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004651521,0.00030967878,0.00050052354,0.0020244035,0.0037417002,0.007892022,0.0016343753,0.002549525,0.044485193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010926948,0.0007314974,0.0009517904,0.0020493204,0.004857549,0.006818486,0.005687735,0.0050649676,0.0057956344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048737355,0.00024672956,0.0039828094,0.00028870144,0.00004984357,0.00017083483,0.001540073,0.0021563033,0.0009536838,0.83885026,0.056144714,0.09556732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011802175,0.00014616821,0.015249939,0.0004823383,0.000039355727,0.00028966434,0.0012898623,0.0066412124,0.0012647712,0.14593934,0.82847583,0.00006350423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020032058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021592584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044485193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013224017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019414436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14881778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338309623","doi":"10.29173/mlj826","title":"The “Great Writ” Reinvigorated? Habeas Corpus in Contemporary Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Writ; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Charter; Sociology; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.07248617957876874,"score_gpt":0.2967868044174128,"score_spread":0.22430062483864405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338309623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2011081,0.04484796,0.002119241,0.28364018,0.0023525339,0.000095011936,0.0010942364,0.00020258882,0.46454012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89329344,0.015023922,0.0018622829,0.018709961,0.0002733631,0.000049178456,0.00020805534,0.00015089117,0.070428856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772924,0.00022098505,0.00004911891,0.00027433873,0.0007335918,0.0009926623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973579,0.0005244175,0.00012527265,0.00012386408,0.0012968614,0.00057161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021759504,0.000326107,0.00046222497,0.0025608148,0.03248097,0.009164175,0.002252622,0.0023142816,0.007782336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051071933,0.0004203738,0.00027006792,0.0053660134,0.023148516,0.0040021003,0.004306843,0.0041168854,0.00034201716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004056648,0.00001531587,0.003930005,0.00014162617,0.0000123161,0.00048559616,0.05006646,0.00030503244,0.00039186407,0.82374525,0.08277645,0.038089544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011193772,0.000009079355,0.012779984,0.00046197345,0.000028069895,0.0001673963,0.07381151,0.00042866694,0.0004578685,0.042005394,0.8697047,0.00013417014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16530463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16530463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20289797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W340801201","doi":"","title":"Strike Laws, Not Children.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Wife; Girl; Brother; Sociology; Officer; Economic Justice; Daughter; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.035353907764039925,"score_gpt":0.3212412113292659,"score_spread":0.285887303565226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W340801201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004066156,0.0064238124,0.00087687664,0.06583001,0.0031769378,0.000046343346,0.0002907915,0.00007721251,0.91921186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13079728,0.0059870244,0.0007330451,0.14147551,0.0015872123,0.00017083948,0.0005553626,0.00011848961,0.71857524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465525,0.00067719026,0.00018254282,0.0009293162,0.0018373195,0.0017183764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971443,0.0005532712,0.00034663928,0.00035803014,0.00088899914,0.0007088172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022704394,0.00042484165,0.0004416131,0.0010660061,0.009667632,0.009211689,0.0015834664,0.011250644,0.056197975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011252506,0.00042052512,0.0002767351,0.0012602912,0.008274078,0.0064877993,0.0043161875,0.009686158,0.012070002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010977423,0.000026487814,0.001737144,0.000045117144,0.000005322173,0.00022472939,0.00428554,0.00003118159,0.00005903805,0.7291779,0.23576981,0.028626785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004163947,0.000010307135,0.000909484,0.00019283488,0.000003119711,0.000119146156,0.002089289,0.000012611151,0.000035757927,0.0136112785,0.9830052,0.000006792185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09126041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1264811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09126041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056777606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011109826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18800092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343696641","doi":"","title":"Proceeding with Precaution: Environmental Principles as Interpretive Tools in Application for Pre-Trial Injunctions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02222540161658648,"score_gpt":0.33095232665803914,"score_spread":0.30872692504145266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343696641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011330093,0.0010628499,0.9239588,0.020628769,0.00047460865,0.00026758024,0.00009042567,0.0004617214,0.04172515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35249522,0.0006499285,0.6382779,0.0020659778,0.0003199205,0.00072876894,0.00007983502,0.0002833379,0.005099142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574914,0.032364935,0.0024998765,0.0017505826,0.0049771317,0.0009160529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91710156,0.06893311,0.002537231,0.0071952473,0.0036766974,0.0005561451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05443632,0.0011327061,0.0010909738,0.002981322,0.00358124,0.01357132,0.0034305626,0.0076191984,0.006468094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110411175,0.0010006527,0.0019125374,0.0017376281,0.023117865,0.01570533,0.006161033,0.009022283,0.0011803994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055117325,0.00005837728,0.00045909104,0.00018605612,0.000027827291,0.00016154896,0.0034462512,0.003504423,0.0003061427,0.9500925,0.00246352,0.039239183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023450873,0.000030475037,0.00027295004,0.0002967768,0.000030168143,0.000059093465,0.0007984563,0.00815192,0.0009305475,0.97632456,0.013046013,0.00003558699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014745508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003094906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05443632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027496663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006313081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2878902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344466164","doi":"10.71781/2252","title":"La détention à des fins d'enquête en droit criminel canadien et son impact sur les droits constitutionnels","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01641044909972117,"score_gpt":0.23686507619957303,"score_spread":0.22045462709985186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344466164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49766374,0.008173277,0.0017686305,0.06724295,0.00102508,0.000112857066,0.00037192256,0.000072948875,0.42356858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83805484,0.004279389,0.00051049073,0.0042154468,0.000102460996,0.000072992494,0.00008852128,0.000047555677,0.15262817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694115,0.0007928112,0.000041488074,0.00020283417,0.0006317046,0.0013900436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491584,0.0014799981,0.0008871655,0.000207562,0.0011599534,0.0013495509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019565616,0.00038298898,0.00031434384,0.0014893684,0.0138563495,0.005751836,0.0012564971,0.0024405979,0.03131802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009107528,0.00028400111,0.00039148476,0.0018529888,0.0060834903,0.0020635847,0.005484315,0.0037875494,0.0024197497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018975153,0.0003093865,0.09707525,0.00048057275,0.00006806273,0.0032183903,0.30042234,0.00088694633,0.0011923887,0.34714878,0.09630276,0.15270536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018298786,0.00019427226,0.18975906,0.0012273637,0.0000859911,0.0008108562,0.34839898,0.00042281664,0.0010238723,0.013552164,0.44436198,0.00014421965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4654689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75111365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5345311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130615365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019367334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92551917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W357905171","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17007412.v1","title":"Non-disclosure of information in the prosecution of preventive detention regimes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certificate; Order (exchange); Terrorism; Political science; Kingdom; Law; Control (management); Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013907541134761513,"score_gpt":0.3146600912582378,"score_spread":0.3007525501234763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W357905171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7255109,0.0073220967,0.0068413573,0.02943299,0.00021995428,0.0003244086,0.00021478612,0.000024428062,0.23010908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932024,0.0010629247,0.00086750084,0.001208402,0.000056639547,0.00003373253,0.000027073695,0.0000031353918,0.0035382204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.970133,0.011402715,0.001725471,0.0011134938,0.010953546,0.004671808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9104717,0.06378396,0.013854563,0.0042436705,0.0067213206,0.0009247741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013780251,0.00016130814,0.0005115599,0.0023361526,0.005415867,0.009283293,0.0014147634,0.0037134346,0.002151851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07408933,0.00045972815,0.00048199992,0.0029467398,0.008038566,0.004467192,0.0048532197,0.004407018,0.00028270116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039128348,0.00019255572,0.049730096,0.0006008298,0.000080605314,0.0065504136,0.09391718,0.0014071431,0.0016098018,0.7405287,0.008145423,0.096846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028359733,0.00057575287,0.23727371,0.00590557,0.00071626203,0.009185806,0.16163152,0.007524044,0.015133862,0.28087845,0.2805139,0.0003775552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06520979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093402684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06520979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010086177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017488685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12966049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36030072","doi":"10.1016/j.beha.2022.101349","title":"De Nederlandse Grondwet geëvalueerd; anker- of verdwijnpunt?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.3455723197882213,"score_gpt":0.6277819884860828,"score_spread":0.2822096686978615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36030072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0351834,0.15255229,0.0113545945,0.06062864,0.010519998,0.00024265653,0.024148406,0.0007571097,0.7046129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28272784,0.107321344,0.02454252,0.0119655235,0.0019286979,0.0004732526,0.015921012,0.002120427,0.5529994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769175,0.00071089796,0.00024595732,0.00047180653,0.00060001865,0.00027953213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991067,0.00031909082,0.00016922432,0.00007867651,0.00016188882,0.0001643664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016946719,0.0007612979,0.0012357179,0.0011326764,0.001387941,0.009340752,0.0009776764,0.0025494583,0.17206304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005220752,0.00059190043,0.0005097742,0.0014636808,0.0015587987,0.0029740739,0.0026734408,0.003049438,0.043681838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053971,0.0002718383,0.0062922933,0.0035078912,0.00027402263,0.0032001545,0.0043638446,0.001191904,0.0028684358,0.13465257,0.4420107,0.40082672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025490057,0.000016444548,0.0011510338,0.0005254102,0.00002171573,0.0005744679,0.0005324034,0.00010711317,0.00033496783,0.0044066356,0.9922869,0.000017270315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02951306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03097939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17206304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002838655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040760874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5756082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.034599470662853536,"score_gpt":0.34732308704007686,"score_spread":0.31272361637722335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36457722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002038233,0.0026560067,0.005051796,0.04706605,0.09367819,0.0004343267,0.002164399,0.0016653097,0.8452457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030189458,0.0021068584,0.003526642,0.0053711752,0.008573815,0.00015431718,0.0006842382,0.0010624238,0.9483311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223775,0.0011512458,0.00039037073,0.00066987565,0.0045525986,0.0009982337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980576,0.0040200828,0.0007205092,0.002234148,0.008282427,0.0041669025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179521,0.000935261,0.0006518846,0.0028276343,0.007100448,0.011889354,0.003236686,0.0047526797,0.44385436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03679266,0.0006405056,0.0007220807,0.0022230654,0.0036154634,0.0033378063,0.00524079,0.0041113878,0.108918086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004395317,0.00001426896,0.00017480786,0.000091027665,0.0000043503596,0.0002754316,0.0003291912,0.00008972246,0.00030312565,0.030646259,0.9329786,0.03504927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038838875,0.0000054648617,0.00013449523,0.000051886607,0.0000018800679,0.00008517429,0.00015814844,0.00007517989,0.000078471094,0.0008647026,0.998533,0.0000075770713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16059113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25353494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8394089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013517428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02355602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7932743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W368270615","doi":"","title":"The Law of Government Ethics: Federal, Ontario and British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02035021057703492,"score_gpt":0.2942341455171852,"score_spread":0.2738839349401503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W368270615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044575304,0.047377005,0.0011346714,0.043956123,0.0007935312,0.00013736165,0.00078163407,0.00006109359,0.8611833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40703112,0.020078091,0.0012701049,0.0049036276,0.00019923356,0.000121945464,0.00029759383,0.00008886871,0.5660094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807274,0.00027659797,0.00006387287,0.00013031592,0.00060502137,0.000851358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974848,0.0007209765,0.0001176072,0.00009445778,0.00092054374,0.00066155905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011796296,0.00060567266,0.00048701846,0.0026123829,0.018807674,0.0128623545,0.001627876,0.0048831273,0.0106607955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046292874,0.00091365434,0.00033120724,0.007439843,0.013361703,0.0029030847,0.0021046174,0.0045973775,0.0007249004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047681966,0.000038254973,0.0035863805,0.00012490919,0.000013223314,0.00041840435,0.025649084,0.0008209784,0.00016060837,0.7403704,0.18896717,0.039802987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026135833,0.000017955153,0.027665792,0.00068923295,0.00003343133,0.0002090062,0.032346554,0.00090149883,0.0001470189,0.07506619,0.8627974,0.000099699355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21102643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21102643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22989991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91509753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W39443587","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-75077-x","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud. \"Code civil du Québec annoté\".","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028068561808073086,"score_gpt":0.26206805696058805,"score_spread":0.23399949515251495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W39443587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011654514,0.1426115,0.011647136,0.13415572,0.054047294,0.0005224665,0.022536635,0.007092904,0.6157318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015872445,0.009871778,0.0015754533,0.003264722,0.00088927674,0.000084598585,0.0013515536,0.0006322304,0.9664579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872166,0.00022951311,0.000036529847,0.00027561546,0.0005568886,0.00017978477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979693,0.00028058246,0.00010488172,0.000087719076,0.0011207641,0.0004366464],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014451067,0.0014909017,0.0009259299,0.001659549,0.0032508702,0.002688461,0.0010537378,0.0021720198,0.40726063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003593466,0.00033929516,0.00044247782,0.0014055242,0.0010864333,0.0014997456,0.0011992765,0.002084474,0.1445566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010866551,0.000037606733,0.0011021483,0.00017197047,0.000011548453,0.00029320476,0.0003327612,0.00013006663,0.00059897505,0.006412694,0.8745297,0.11627056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004969663,0.0000080373875,0.0015779887,0.00007675053,0.0000019196082,0.00013537209,0.0001746915,0.00012304992,0.00017664993,0.00021274731,0.9974929,0.000014896051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54268277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6144128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45731723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006431292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058801626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92002094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40392389","doi":"","title":"Vancouver Area Community Corrections and Aboriginal Justice: A Review of Aboriginal Federal Offenders and Sentencing Alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07134317181790664,"score_gpt":0.3536987596419658,"score_spread":0.2823555878240591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40392389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010517884,0.9993993,0.000006573709,0.000119824086,0.000028228622,0.000005555461,0.000011103173,6.359435e-7,0.00032358768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010728661,0.998711,0.00004170331,0.00006763031,0.000014834067,0.0000066501484,0.000015628782,4.1465995e-7,0.00006919616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804485,0.00064559473,0.0003654442,0.00014192286,0.00069900264,0.000103139384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991771,0.0053886995,0.0008658504,0.00011681726,0.0016192314,0.00023838287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00433439,0.0008158692,0.002369254,0.010175808,0.0013093475,0.0024839053,0.0016529574,0.0014024489,0.0033515894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010528569,0.00062535447,0.0011505964,0.011568739,0.0015661943,0.0013690776,0.001082823,0.0015687443,0.0003373512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012026996,0.000054558863,0.00072249636,0.23577559,0.00051305594,0.00022329958,0.0009262132,0.00018879627,0.00016567681,0.0028057592,0.013595957,0.74490833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005678203,0.00022294588,0.011123163,0.35460612,0.0022376778,0.0011010539,0.002091261,0.00007217968,0.00024546112,0.0011289608,0.6270543,0.000060151342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13904428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38768274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005834252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024557268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2764699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40421862","doi":"","title":"Post-Offence Conduct: Investigative Strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; CLARITY; Interrogation; Innocence; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Presumption; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.1528907106846487,"score_gpt":0.3856384865011614,"score_spread":0.23274777581651268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40421862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09104333,0.0104412455,0.080656484,0.033174664,0.0006193648,0.0042279647,0.00020849585,0.00027824726,0.77935016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.813776,0.007841134,0.049855024,0.005585266,0.0005564846,0.0031016916,0.00021459858,0.00010329815,0.11896665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882119,0.006525162,0.0006703262,0.0009425788,0.0021651008,0.0014849423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680604,0.0071686637,0.0015017869,0.0010455017,0.002386784,0.0010913735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126479305,0.0006125456,0.00041843057,0.0046265638,0.0046644565,0.010681028,0.002408443,0.0038022501,0.0059234775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019748433,0.00037625642,0.000518798,0.0019258646,0.008339465,0.005126471,0.0055075916,0.0027644327,0.0024969736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007700558,0.00042373716,0.010126378,0.00038247177,0.000021180413,0.004397436,0.07201316,0.0005189949,0.0024258974,0.7170356,0.01570652,0.17687155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003645177,0.00072217645,0.02310635,0.002614521,0.000051871295,0.0069636432,0.13873938,0.0026797152,0.0043754997,0.3082659,0.5123302,0.000114364986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025550604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023655917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126479305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066673076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012941264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066889405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205402466","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3969982","title":"Denying &amp;amp; Reckoning with Implicit Law: The Case of the City of Toronto v. Ontario (A.G.)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03250534484053531,"score_gpt":0.3137640131478073,"score_spread":0.281258668307272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205402466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40788794,0.0051166215,0.0019118495,0.14246553,0.00042084669,0.0001541771,0.0007611368,0.000046300793,0.44123566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92030334,0.0018178775,0.0004745155,0.011791519,0.000089038374,0.00003812381,0.00010529434,0.000021713427,0.06535852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971449,0.00031955162,0.00011500566,0.00020959724,0.0008095978,0.0014014393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683595,0.0010438727,0.00045482113,0.00020388927,0.00080847065,0.00065311114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154727,0.00038745452,0.0003199589,0.0005967717,0.025348611,0.004156684,0.0021760655,0.007354051,0.006441657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007294994,0.000585864,0.00044265605,0.0017042762,0.00846456,0.0015147099,0.0021918714,0.0065983552,0.00044689822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020278788,0.000065642176,0.07744921,0.00035796594,0.000105203064,0.009436586,0.121769086,0.001430778,0.0010713951,0.52194756,0.23496543,0.031198312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003289742,0.0001651557,0.2099061,0.0011050769,0.0007975136,0.0031417967,0.15176915,0.0030368904,0.0029917187,0.03122064,0.59512335,0.00041351875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99005616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054978844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054978844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07348694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39890134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205507244","doi":"10.7202/1027549ar","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Patrice Deslauriers (dir.), Droit à l’égalité et discrimination : Aspects nouveaux, Association Henri Capitant (section québécoise), Montréal, Yvon Blais, 2002, 330 pages, ISBN 2-89451-556-1 Pierre-Claude Lafond, Techniques de repérage des sources documentaires du droit, 2 édition, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2002, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-591-X Andrée Lajoie, Quand les minorités font la loi, Paris, P.U.F., 2002, 217 pages, ISBN 2-13-052330-7 Pierre Laporte, Hélène OuiMET, Code du travail du Québec, Législation, Jurisprudence, Doctrine, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 14 édition, 2001, 852 pages, ISBN 2-89127-547-0 Ouvrage collectif, Le droit à l’égalité : les tribunaux d’arbitrage et le Tribunal des droits de la personne, Montréal, Themis, 2001, 273 pages, ISBN 2-89400-142-8 Jeffrey Talpis, If I am from Grand-Mère, Why Am I Being Sued in Texas?: Responding to Inappropriate Foreign Jurisdiction in Quebec-United States Crossboarder Litigation, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 250 pages, ISBN 2-89400-139-8 Daniel Turp, Le droit de choisir : Essais sur le droit du Québec à disposer de lui-même, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 996 pages, ISBN 2-89400-158-4 J.-P. VILLAGGI, L’évaluation psychologique dans le contexte légal : Sources et commentaires, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2001, 284 pages, ISBN 2-89451-498-0","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Section (typography); Art; Art history; Cartography; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.011454539894189583,"score_gpt":0.2379682453715552,"score_spread":0.2265137054773656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205507244","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060162804,0.84582746,0.0008850809,0.09485788,0.01468376,0.000044486864,0.00062599254,0.00015932831,0.04231442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01786742,0.5373263,0.0015893113,0.032986764,0.0052802972,0.00011602792,0.0005852306,0.00026334872,0.40398535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976816,0.00036471334,0.000119806864,0.0004427368,0.0011245259,0.0002666252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828583,0.00044725725,0.00017214581,0.000049039565,0.00081649644,0.000229165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018570122,0.0021051762,0.00094471406,0.0022745586,0.0058512725,0.007290313,0.0016823891,0.00599766,0.053986393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040897494,0.0010276444,0.00050161325,0.0039976193,0.002573573,0.0058361054,0.0021168382,0.0053308727,0.028708283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016363469,0.000010664752,0.0003055599,0.00020336515,0.0000060929215,0.0000781292,0.0005836186,0.000052458465,0.00008155279,0.004181863,0.96043134,0.03404908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053035205,0.000003732525,0.0013385203,0.00031614242,0.000004354626,0.00015009698,0.00057704834,0.00004195448,0.000067989764,0.0012456247,0.9962353,0.000013888211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5483971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71702355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9460136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016044188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014169388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90852493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206510466","doi":"10.7202/1081771ar","title":"LES IMPACTS POTENTIELS DES ENQUÊTES DU MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE SUR L’IDENTITÉ MÉTISSE","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches amérindiennes au Québec","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Saint-Boniface","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07976891672701765,"score_gpt":0.3516151272423994,"score_spread":0.27184621051538177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206510466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80000854,0.009261649,0.00117719,0.0293517,0.0005801645,0.00029433428,0.0036649976,0.00006394844,0.15559755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477552,0.0033863399,0.0006091506,0.001863672,0.00012336277,0.00012400017,0.00082007947,0.000027785294,0.045290444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98322695,0.00598695,0.000389631,0.00055009016,0.005830317,0.0040160436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97481495,0.006863691,0.0031519637,0.0005853386,0.011206041,0.003377968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009004714,0.00058903365,0.00069873856,0.0027888892,0.004206137,0.0037285856,0.0010228072,0.0018593029,0.021952286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025926026,0.00041291813,0.0010143932,0.00220641,0.0020734111,0.0014808908,0.004817062,0.0022240207,0.0012485856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030100835,0.0010553187,0.5091503,0.0023412493,0.002110198,0.002155112,0.032501537,0.012237686,0.005757863,0.06769215,0.098831534,0.26315695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011835017,0.0005654723,0.8620209,0.0007373103,0.00047147123,0.00015148714,0.015792262,0.0010786903,0.0012336337,0.002520197,0.11518157,0.00012855418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7848927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8616783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96951455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03048547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028498331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43274826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210949216","doi":"10.7202/1085791ar","title":"Examen parlementaire et contrôle judiciaire de la législation exécutive : évaluation de l’expérience canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029657543650187683,"score_gpt":0.31293348090838424,"score_spread":0.28327593725819655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210949216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89775187,0.0021029953,0.00056624995,0.0060948515,0.00013936085,0.00012200471,0.00012944995,0.0000183234,0.093074836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975339,0.0010761026,0.0002570119,0.0007674074,0.000043162097,0.00005210555,0.00007445902,0.000013260236,0.02237742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871644,0.004948488,0.00029502856,0.00065877195,0.004636684,0.0022966587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704772,0.012541486,0.0016504223,0.00091022585,0.010333886,0.004086732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013756585,0.00026300753,0.0005207947,0.0026075183,0.009640874,0.0064432016,0.0012338578,0.0016387774,0.00894114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03199993,0.00035482025,0.00035060785,0.003417268,0.007403407,0.0022141659,0.003870393,0.0028494343,0.00070030254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023689168,0.00082013983,0.13060062,0.00027185018,0.00005885789,0.001204615,0.7336989,0.00036646912,0.00076213735,0.01733512,0.0132157635,0.10142857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006292743,0.00051001535,0.24435198,0.00042191532,0.000053340864,0.00041412108,0.5717153,0.00046731305,0.0011256259,0.0014041879,0.1793312,0.00014204872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6962482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8773952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30375183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039491672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04394805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61108136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212961305","doi":"10.1002/9781118269565.indcas","title":"Cases Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. George's, University of London; Louisiana State University; Georgetown University; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; York University; University of Miami; Emory University; Michigan State University; University of Pennsylvania; Università degli Studi di Firenze; Florida State University; Purdue University","keywords":"Index (typography); Citation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05104125988770594,"score_gpt":0.3687903258739418,"score_spread":0.31774906598623587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212961305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025567298,0.00050481077,0.0008053808,0.0010311953,0.00075476884,0.0006560566,0.12443019,0.0015404458,0.8677203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008197562,0.00097035477,0.0016411854,0.0007292258,0.0005208501,0.0004324228,0.09842723,0.0006481791,0.88843286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980338,0.00014476723,0.00017681318,0.00021860452,0.0012002089,0.00022577554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463874,0.0006396366,0.00045845553,0.00050235447,0.002675182,0.0010855461],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008961565,0.0008500483,0.0008041821,0.017038161,0.0018582809,0.0036027557,0.0017628403,0.0011022546,0.5804929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00937231,0.00037175577,0.0007375287,0.00844522,0.00039596716,0.001998011,0.0021767851,0.0013283949,0.3897884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003197539,0.00005953701,0.0011163589,0.000088301196,0.000003892741,0.00004816151,0.000030198835,0.00004603991,0.00007961851,0.0022150653,0.9500598,0.04622096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025307721,0.000017059969,0.0058652265,0.000109998226,0.0000073062583,0.00019719216,0.000100209734,0.00015570364,0.0001789001,0.001643747,0.9916893,0.000010005939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010183865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020570165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4195071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016597394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034138693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5983759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213248514","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.43531","title":"Grimes, Hon. Roger (Dale), (born 2 May 1950), MHA (L) Exploits, 1989–2005; Premier, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 2000–03","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.02922701572947382,"score_gpt":0.2897968117371346,"score_spread":0.2605697960076608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213248514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060198857,0.118422784,0.0011664078,0.09536812,0.013786195,0.00013294778,0.027792474,0.0005434622,0.7367677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011180342,0.019417861,0.000309028,0.00267185,0.00047778027,0.000024614712,0.0015054712,0.000079087135,0.9643341],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978393,0.000022751065,0.00001550967,0.000044535205,0.00007844504,0.000054934564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994848,0.00011295205,0.000042922773,0.000017680572,0.00021576702,0.00012593648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047315404,0.0005181358,0.00042587362,0.0016819823,0.0022104029,0.0014072586,0.000743711,0.0007713719,0.18356854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018457237,0.00026184358,0.0001243696,0.0012188664,0.00040108626,0.0014077914,0.0011150021,0.0017378323,0.05904051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010699287,0.000010067608,0.00035788398,0.000040831954,0.0000011803021,0.000112595895,0.00014657358,0.000021832664,0.000020697973,0.0036007587,0.95630574,0.039371077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002803607,0.0000060042025,0.0020369124,0.00010926356,0.0000013191809,0.00016836384,0.00021294532,0.000014281462,0.000055726807,0.0009486235,0.9964372,0.0000065242352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09902382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32148325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81643146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019702062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033541466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61409795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221090915","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0096","title":"The reinvention of Canadian tort law, 1945–95: <i>Jordan House</i> as case study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Pleading; Law; Plaintiff; Lawsuit; Redress; Political science; Tort reform; Doctrine; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.026942741274139426,"score_gpt":0.26372171234855196,"score_spread":0.23677897107441254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221090915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78621286,0.006158294,0.0008748991,0.011403987,0.00016636729,0.00025710862,0.00044494984,0.00003236608,0.19444923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95685947,0.0032030805,0.0010574865,0.0023506365,0.000036928086,0.000078429315,0.00015221139,0.000020319429,0.036241405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955153,0.0007519772,0.00009186819,0.0003218279,0.0014786489,0.0018403976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966691,0.00065173267,0.00030610687,0.000129889,0.0014317405,0.0008115161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035220995,0.00044217505,0.00035149773,0.0039247056,0.0372003,0.004164664,0.0020253495,0.0023439138,0.0034784456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053587393,0.0004132139,0.00037023742,0.006059566,0.011483592,0.0017268996,0.0043950314,0.00319735,0.00033700356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018526845,0.00037351702,0.06282861,0.00025493687,0.000052620137,0.011992558,0.45855597,0.0012802874,0.0012008781,0.3139295,0.06849253,0.080853306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035539695,0.00012071788,0.06679694,0.00036761005,0.00005280059,0.0026710986,0.28704745,0.0010644009,0.0018811717,0.0036436494,0.6361702,0.00014837639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13995153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13995153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12580031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224298600","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.6","title":"Justice in Extreme Cases: Criminal Law Theory Meets International Criminal Law. By Darryl Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 305 + xix pages.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.030777963084795027,"score_gpt":0.2596928976830463,"score_spread":0.2289149345982513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224298600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027743127,0.89868605,0.0018267675,0.06709831,0.0023261772,0.000018142262,0.00017877105,0.0000596097,0.029528787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027536355,0.8810021,0.0044787866,0.0117391115,0.005806047,0.0001505024,0.0004935193,0.00014525003,0.06864834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975216,0.0011332243,0.00018861207,0.00024531406,0.00071567803,0.0001955971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965413,0.0020299351,0.00037629734,0.0001898852,0.0005708218,0.00029168127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031964034,0.0017620911,0.0012425706,0.0053707184,0.0020033047,0.00419854,0.0022032862,0.0048085432,0.020501908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077357246,0.0016129229,0.0007887874,0.0052177124,0.008241307,0.013595746,0.0040063662,0.0060546487,0.0069703013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001786025,0.000024556204,0.00025693572,0.0007308187,0.000015875936,0.00010013978,0.0008567901,0.00029332738,0.000049718514,0.07701817,0.79580563,0.124830246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020710768,0.000015122916,0.0028659375,0.0040168692,0.000015268222,0.0005731167,0.0017323402,0.00063161086,0.00008202384,0.21149799,0.7785128,0.000036226444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02495249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04778279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02495249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046976698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045388737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06858575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225504452","doi":"10.36642/mjil.43.2.criminal","title":"Criminal Law in A World of States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Criminal law; Political science; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Municipal law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029243267011669325,"score_gpt":0.3300993353739787,"score_spread":0.3008560683623093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225504452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040320557,0.011897293,0.023809908,0.07920251,0.0008607191,0.000028604549,0.00010717202,0.00009893886,0.8436743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943144,0.006772162,0.005137486,0.012407423,0.0011040568,0.00010422977,0.000107102685,0.000066865454,0.031156544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722064,0.0013189052,0.00008752046,0.0004915689,0.00056664797,0.00031469722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817073,0.00092188374,0.00020443214,0.00028310384,0.00022584053,0.00019403464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020137106,0.00034302796,0.00041913657,0.0015866947,0.008305058,0.0135264145,0.000714889,0.0036764876,0.008097586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004013452,0.0002856865,0.00040917977,0.0023559425,0.027263869,0.013048144,0.0060125743,0.005942663,0.00080913695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2788125e-7,0.0000015358207,0.000066597415,0.0000034024768,7.8223536e-7,0.000011161826,0.00069938914,0.00006379502,0.0000070457404,0.9973984,0.00082269736,0.00092443987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003830785,0.000007190329,0.00023549992,0.000076049124,0.000003986844,0.00004352133,0.002294136,0.00038416233,0.000035390894,0.88441443,0.11249269,0.000009115731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00661576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007567713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135264145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005110295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035785967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037077963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225562594","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4063124","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Business; Personally identifiable information; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science","score_opus":0.01957235627340888,"score_gpt":0.2604508874145545,"score_spread":0.24087853114114563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225562594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05558626,0.007190393,0.0008216398,0.74299943,0.0014362808,0.00008145874,0.0010129755,0.00007023141,0.19080123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.730315,0.007782778,0.0018553708,0.12932281,0.001420887,0.00009704182,0.00046541393,0.00011526847,0.12862536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97470844,0.0029057192,0.00053652603,0.0014019846,0.009909267,0.010538085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289282,0.018601617,0.002434365,0.001609287,0.027622191,0.020804351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01890183,0.0004188424,0.00088667386,0.003567633,0.022366585,0.027920913,0.0040951287,0.017199496,0.019939236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055403773,0.00087161723,0.0008666154,0.003500169,0.015508146,0.008351047,0.0045845844,0.014367656,0.001685969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025855284,0.00017498949,0.02977091,0.00019565118,0.000056409426,0.0003374974,0.007015228,0.0011667518,0.00030166807,0.48584497,0.40380016,0.071077205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019393627,0.00014039328,0.075453535,0.0017840564,0.00022805776,0.00023792137,0.026350498,0.0032421132,0.00076299906,0.0843334,0.806794,0.00047918918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99622107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14716034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14716034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38905522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226521428","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4061125","title":"The Real Lesson of the Freedom Convoy ‘Emergency’: Canada Needs a Public Order Policing Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Public order; Order (exchange); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.017454993032595966,"score_gpt":0.2755493330074708,"score_spread":0.25809433997487485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226521428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007367791,0.0018148415,0.0002850108,0.9520983,0.0014769206,0.000024411545,0.00020212818,0.00003024577,0.03670037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18672042,0.0028031855,0.0015942167,0.7189805,0.001228121,0.000050742456,0.00021757507,0.00013463742,0.08827053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98742783,0.0012892241,0.00027686305,0.0008734448,0.0043802843,0.00575241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97759444,0.0045125,0.0006521147,0.0006013179,0.0069613573,0.009678321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006966042,0.00066276814,0.00087924884,0.0010646518,0.028861318,0.016089862,0.0042553428,0.03627636,0.016554061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032653816,0.0007901536,0.0010168038,0.0014381649,0.019733453,0.0068061743,0.0066832965,0.0365906,0.0018732392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073561154,0.00005828247,0.0034926867,0.0001512234,0.000042936903,0.00065774925,0.006365386,0.00041806736,0.00025516184,0.15805204,0.80836684,0.022066107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094653566,0.000036886322,0.008807841,0.0006272113,0.00007375741,0.00017971876,0.017075706,0.00041560442,0.00027407784,0.034684025,0.93748665,0.00024395755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9897798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99533695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092901245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092901245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43757516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6740489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230387117","doi":"10.7202/042818ar","title":"Duquet Revisited","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018064131597059538,"score_gpt":0.28433694206368576,"score_spread":0.2662728104666262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230387117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006948333,0.006770395,0.005087678,0.05327043,0.005906832,0.00007322512,0.00020582076,0.00023245209,0.92150474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11098756,0.0031871456,0.0012640044,0.024026934,0.001650206,0.00013699397,0.00020696186,0.0005658868,0.8579744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905826,0.0032722875,0.00032472357,0.0018583937,0.0017633613,0.0021986433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518377,0.0013660155,0.0002554026,0.0006368807,0.0017724189,0.00078554323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005994599,0.0009654426,0.00085502805,0.0024239616,0.024953488,0.014806238,0.0034979577,0.009185717,0.1029796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145371435,0.0009036676,0.0015134462,0.0029885278,0.01591582,0.010461768,0.011666567,0.014048085,0.022480754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030092746,0.0000116553065,0.00025101108,0.00004848626,0.0000050373833,0.00022921414,0.0075843395,0.00005670116,0.000049495924,0.87682414,0.104117386,0.0107923625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069770695,0.0000074292057,0.00014980246,0.000095391755,0.0000034991322,0.000117684285,0.002098881,0.00005306071,0.00005138486,0.018002523,0.97940254,0.000010883919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09599205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13074557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1029796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023568664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01547959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34450108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231199517","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.153","title":"LEGITIMATING PUBLIC POLICY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Public policy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Policy making; Democratic legitimacy; Policy analysis; Position (finance); Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.049899822072171154,"score_gpt":0.28419272028929593,"score_spread":0.2342928982171248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231199517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02031098,0.0024652565,0.091247775,0.23126704,0.001550364,0.00028235314,0.00019359893,0.00043687568,0.65224576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93583196,0.0015706654,0.0231374,0.015527346,0.0010972178,0.0002735171,0.00013893213,0.00017922386,0.022243848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92919225,0.025496073,0.002256923,0.007998297,0.027163701,0.007892774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8979909,0.051264048,0.005258881,0.017139452,0.024676185,0.0036705974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0775707,0.0008143728,0.001250063,0.0051917075,0.016578058,0.02212119,0.0037414776,0.0105277,0.0065429956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13200668,0.0007036582,0.00084581866,0.0030455033,0.07397242,0.010473177,0.012250878,0.013944029,0.0010635407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029717742,0.000005630344,0.00021847532,0.000022732282,0.0000053010654,0.000022819404,0.0017365662,0.0002710056,0.000053079075,0.99172544,0.0021056724,0.0038302278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025572017,0.000010453063,0.0005187466,0.00027293706,0.00002006231,0.000025271733,0.0015766729,0.0007422355,0.00037328425,0.8380347,0.15837264,0.000027409404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16816956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14707658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16816956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039029125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104320765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41023797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231452064","doi":"10.7202/042661ar","title":"A Response to the Suggested Amendment Relating to Provincial Administrative Tribunals","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03613728939388007,"score_gpt":0.3339286611360973,"score_spread":0.29779137174221726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231452064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05843106,0.005076454,0.010209242,0.7518156,0.026579697,0.0009203055,0.0016294814,0.00050956296,0.14482851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26936004,0.002315564,0.009892972,0.41093928,0.006286809,0.0009630925,0.00033951458,0.00022083848,0.29968187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9578828,0.011181143,0.004142347,0.004112752,0.012957988,0.009723003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95394295,0.027706254,0.0030460083,0.0035677184,0.010023631,0.001713499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028353201,0.0009871601,0.0012214588,0.0020796896,0.016446223,0.01176131,0.0066496744,0.057414766,0.0074538523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1032063,0.0014265148,0.0032310775,0.0033888605,0.011321838,0.003052681,0.0060685244,0.03555777,0.0023751357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024883516,0.000106216045,0.0035115436,0.0004651911,0.00007302545,0.0021560607,0.024060775,0.0011106083,0.004267999,0.6066756,0.3427499,0.0145742195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107042106,0.000116915166,0.0069870553,0.00052796415,0.00012237726,0.00035227093,0.0063340412,0.0008896893,0.0027259332,0.022531465,0.95904005,0.0002652594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2601351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39500183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2601351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037617248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03757834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51724195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231564628","doi":"10.29173/alr788","title":"You Don't Know What You've Got 'Til It's Gone: The Rule of Law in Canada — Part II","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Independence (probability theory); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.056558306083832006,"score_gpt":0.3189460206199108,"score_spread":0.2623877145360788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231564628","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053949665,0.34107,0.0013968345,0.26556852,0.0033342273,0.00012908927,0.001720204,0.00004901263,0.3327824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69944924,0.18276413,0.0014166911,0.034839667,0.00088772963,0.000048716294,0.0007937449,0.00007009789,0.079730056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410385,0.0006313884,0.0001612165,0.00035247582,0.003630907,0.0011202432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863107,0.0028115693,0.0005494685,0.0001820258,0.006857984,0.0009679841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035708994,0.0002681339,0.000560788,0.0044348934,0.009614218,0.009102796,0.0014769566,0.0027957216,0.004401314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014059133,0.00039339217,0.00029349566,0.007481569,0.009810368,0.0017979786,0.0010992561,0.0041949493,0.00037469095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056252866,0.00004488494,0.014486743,0.0014579289,0.00011324552,0.00058847264,0.0114269545,0.001084278,0.0004296912,0.45602044,0.37356663,0.14072455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002432832,0.000029495468,0.08018035,0.0026599863,0.00012654324,0.00019426858,0.014533007,0.0005842966,0.00039988876,0.030704977,0.870441,0.00012194034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99765635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09963936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09963936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22581641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7229376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231995041","doi":"10.7202/1027462ar","title":"Alain Baccigalupo, Police et droits de l’homme : droit pénal comparé Canada-France, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2001, 1032 pages, ISBN 2-89451-519-7 John Currie, Public International Law, Essentials of Canadian Law, Toronto, Irwin Law, 2001, 446 pages, ISBN 1-55221-051-0 Maurice MARTEL, Paul MARTEL, La compagnie au Québec : Les aspects juridiques, volume I, Montréal, édition spéciale, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002, pagination par chapitre, ISBN 2-920831-88-7 Donna F. Ryan, John S. Schuchman, Deaf People in Hitler's Europe, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C., 2002, 233 pages","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02033145907969716,"score_gpt":0.23744157701433521,"score_spread":0.21711011793463805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231995041","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054740935,0.82925797,0.00030348237,0.050526887,0.0058189067,0.00003053705,0.0012245291,0.000121426,0.11216882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01845165,0.564772,0.0010090087,0.015319047,0.0035497705,0.0000796649,0.0013857309,0.00027869456,0.39515448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989819,0.00007995093,0.000036516965,0.00013222624,0.00061218336,0.00015714554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990188,0.00018092201,0.00006741761,0.000016376856,0.00051014195,0.00020632347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065857125,0.0018467578,0.0007639935,0.0043475307,0.005328206,0.007454378,0.0014049286,0.00320859,0.07896951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018844914,0.0005223896,0.000403962,0.009185136,0.0022727565,0.003543322,0.0016893221,0.0036721705,0.018533835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008697272,0.000007632556,0.00024840492,0.00021200403,0.000004165379,0.00003066296,0.0005014569,0.00004886455,0.000040135892,0.006005443,0.9647597,0.028132824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027487695,0.0000023101861,0.0029346505,0.0005439077,0.000004593736,0.00005579061,0.0008734381,0.000024419762,0.000035314544,0.0012544141,0.99425864,0.0000097853535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87257135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9383612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032131862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02560381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26417935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233329049","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181012","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen and Lorena Lam <i>[2014] A.J. No. 428, 2014 ABPC 90 LEXIS 420 (Alberta Provincial Court, April 17, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Lexis; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Botany; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018510656965219644,"score_gpt":0.26642897037290825,"score_spread":0.2479183134076886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233329049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050666984,0.0128895715,0.0012610722,0.18332931,0.008165345,0.00018054139,0.0016026712,0.00033849574,0.78716636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018505147,0.0012883524,0.00032610615,0.049246218,0.0004642676,0.00004747068,0.00017259743,0.00008813767,0.92986184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981287,0.00018705346,0.000045623536,0.0002931428,0.000725229,0.0006202964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802643,0.0006846648,0.00007139255,0.000078526406,0.00076573266,0.0003731904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017720137,0.00053546013,0.00048595166,0.0009232053,0.017492281,0.007828183,0.0016031228,0.0074965507,0.076955214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069489493,0.0006875264,0.00049045164,0.00089457474,0.0025287552,0.0023788172,0.0024596083,0.0094665475,0.017683493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022769804,0.000010306291,0.00038119373,0.00003144529,0.000005465013,0.0001631672,0.0007430416,0.000025105039,0.0001344506,0.037908636,0.95380604,0.0067682974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070945916,0.0000085237625,0.0017824725,0.00013296101,0.0000053362833,0.00007806735,0.001426503,0.000049286966,0.00020839392,0.0028895405,0.9933888,0.000023010252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5368219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81648034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5368219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011147966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018931145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9318117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233430983","doi":"10.7202/1027463ar","title":"William M. Clements, Oratory in Native North America, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, 2002, 186 pages Gilles Létourneau, Pierre Robert, Code de procédure pénale du Québec annoté, 5 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2002, 871 pages, ISBN 2-89127-553-5 Hubert Reid, Claire Carrier, Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et Doctrine, 18 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2002, 1494 pages, ISBN 2-89127-555-1","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017948350443539544,"score_gpt":0.23871220949038408,"score_spread":0.22076385904684453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233430983","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009026509,0.62885976,0.0007278378,0.061527263,0.018077428,0.000049134975,0.0010880061,0.00019250922,0.28857553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009248682,0.30024907,0.0010529043,0.009388449,0.0034808912,0.00006792971,0.00058669946,0.00015095533,0.6757744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993699,0.00013448014,0.000043805783,0.00012295647,0.00026862614,0.000060144506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939346,0.00016945218,0.000057712172,0.00003874878,0.0002650434,0.00007563186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084288325,0.0009859373,0.00055863115,0.0018965391,0.0034437862,0.0036553543,0.0009877115,0.0016692955,0.07792193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020952916,0.00043512695,0.0002794072,0.0036327196,0.0017824856,0.0044222036,0.0014441472,0.0028495127,0.022356708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058844334,0.0000067265623,0.0001255507,0.0001675834,0.0000023288937,0.000029703397,0.0009350243,0.000021879905,0.000045702818,0.0067401733,0.9655029,0.026416475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013351905,0.0000016213687,0.0006277377,0.00026325797,0.0000021182725,0.000041554227,0.0007108037,0.000008028413,0.000020551775,0.0006311176,0.9976884,0.000003528251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20273119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2931546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7972688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051181656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006480562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40310234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234953274","doi":"10.29173/alr104","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04124957388427745,"score_gpt":0.3541180729194079,"score_spread":0.3128684990351304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234953274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085299683,0.15371804,0.0039694626,0.09714852,0.1157499,0.0002538856,0.010098145,0.0014987082,0.61671036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053167506,0.060744237,0.001647567,0.0378892,0.030148596,0.00014516569,0.007514672,0.0004818457,0.85611194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769825,0.00023034417,0.00008620863,0.00037666917,0.0013244373,0.00028403997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413717,0.0007864113,0.00027628112,0.00037414182,0.003635535,0.0007904721],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001989438,0.0009531098,0.0008902518,0.0031780908,0.0015845998,0.0048398236,0.0023701682,0.0029728906,0.31445777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075790053,0.00043586674,0.0007747916,0.0027917856,0.0011681836,0.0022472432,0.0019770777,0.0033446439,0.18425994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014102847,0.0000063486173,0.00012983389,0.00023785053,0.0000037593231,0.000022535854,0.00003498476,0.000035603505,0.000067996465,0.00539276,0.9536084,0.040445816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016866719,0.0000031342324,0.00029086936,0.0001681526,0.000001982927,0.000024610978,0.000018196506,0.0000069997473,0.00001551751,0.0009141175,0.99855155,0.0000031363913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05123532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074017495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6855422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005053734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009028727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9778428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235167399","doi":"10.21991/cf29417","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026382444784000644,"score_gpt":0.3017124128306336,"score_spread":0.27532996804663296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235167399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009937964,0.011356966,0.003166219,0.072644494,0.13996054,0.00026149175,0.009430685,0.0012463633,0.7609395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006869709,0.0074120373,0.0017291253,0.023418128,0.035786886,0.00022856244,0.008552566,0.0007965131,0.9152065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770194,0.00031937845,0.00012269389,0.00046718324,0.0011072875,0.00028145994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951357,0.00091830536,0.00023607987,0.0004725717,0.0022103242,0.0010270677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002043381,0.00095286284,0.0007131334,0.001801255,0.00202392,0.0072214664,0.0019789962,0.0037245776,0.55588454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010853603,0.00029880108,0.00064313953,0.0015023414,0.0009294567,0.0042928606,0.0031029552,0.0030510314,0.33915925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565321,0.000011898788,0.000103567974,0.000095614596,0.0000016542556,0.000024723518,0.00006762635,0.000023432593,0.0000783503,0.006353111,0.95697266,0.03625156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019624151,0.0000053251665,0.00012974236,0.00007538624,8.014185e-7,0.000022496142,0.000043015276,0.000008679912,0.000019860123,0.0014721188,0.9982181,0.0000026174105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024595417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032607103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55588454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019412921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004006467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235702979","doi":"10.4135/9781412963916.n52","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Encyclopedia of Education Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.019353915251439334,"score_gpt":0.2983462665646404,"score_spread":0.2789923513132011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235702979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028523472,0.008901387,0.002460668,0.032412063,0.0067987437,0.00036762006,0.02015514,0.00046922607,0.92558295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048854362,0.0102095865,0.008842705,0.0046680374,0.0011734678,0.0003499831,0.006744889,0.00034908878,0.9188078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919864,0.00042314408,0.0003139265,0.0005349104,0.0055015087,0.0012399999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98910123,0.00057934667,0.00023512788,0.0005481191,0.008505112,0.0010311304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033129184,0.0010473082,0.0009807143,0.008460662,0.01042179,0.010749123,0.0026962443,0.0037624256,0.036753748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010499737,0.0007771538,0.00076729426,0.010079633,0.0038919952,0.0025967848,0.001608406,0.006381647,0.0054712826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008029692,0.000009491718,0.00021389846,0.000053737076,0.000002479839,0.000021528176,0.00022753504,0.00015693309,0.00003123463,0.2662317,0.7182709,0.014772614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044235476,0.0000019485647,0.0010345241,0.00006870604,0.0000029954406,0.000013990357,0.00010881771,0.00009998806,0.00003691336,0.00452363,0.9940866,0.000017448712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98860663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98949337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083062656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083062656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27890733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6026646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249622","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17007412","title":"Non-disclosure of information in the prosecution of preventive detention regimes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certificate; Order (exchange); Terrorism; Political science; Law; Kingdom; Control (management); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013907541134761513,"score_gpt":0.3146600912582378,"score_spread":0.3007525501234763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7255109,0.0073220967,0.0068413573,0.02943299,0.00021995428,0.0003244086,0.00021478612,0.000024428062,0.23010908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932024,0.0010629247,0.00086750084,0.001208402,0.000056639547,0.00003373253,0.000027073695,0.0000031353918,0.0035382204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.970133,0.011402715,0.001725471,0.0011134938,0.010953546,0.004671808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9104717,0.06378396,0.013854563,0.0042436705,0.0067213206,0.0009247741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013780251,0.00016130814,0.0005115599,0.0023361526,0.005415867,0.009283293,0.0014147634,0.0037134346,0.002151851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07408933,0.00045972815,0.00048199992,0.0029467398,0.008038566,0.004467192,0.0048532197,0.004407018,0.00028270116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039128348,0.00019255572,0.049730096,0.0006008298,0.000080605314,0.0065504136,0.09391718,0.0014071431,0.0016098018,0.7405287,0.008145423,0.096846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028359733,0.00057575287,0.23727371,0.00590557,0.00071626203,0.009185806,0.16163152,0.007524044,0.015133862,0.28087845,0.2805139,0.0003775552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06520979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093402684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06520979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010086177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017488685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12966049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236626227","doi":"10.4324/9780203854389-17","title":"Applying “the McCarthy Test” to Canadian and American security legislation: A 10-year retrospective on the impact of September 11, 2001 on privacy rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Test (biology); Political science; Computer security; Law; Internet privacy; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.030857048252489687,"score_gpt":0.3163075934345032,"score_spread":0.2854505451820135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236626227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03695058,0.02318294,0.0014777757,0.039610896,0.001421405,0.00019283057,0.0031823376,0.00013433708,0.8938469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42173535,0.030880978,0.0037445696,0.040300466,0.0006394426,0.00025109397,0.0035270713,0.0003756743,0.4985454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99013793,0.00065703166,0.0001839582,0.0005572492,0.0066796513,0.0017841085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841818,0.004523606,0.0006118174,0.0004795695,0.009545186,0.00065789267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007467698,0.00050408865,0.00041036747,0.0074173138,0.013805184,0.005981382,0.0025556972,0.0027833194,0.007749066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020279828,0.0005521165,0.000599581,0.00996993,0.009479645,0.0030416616,0.0019451864,0.0051760334,0.0011180999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004374473,0.000041645606,0.00909321,0.00020327017,0.000022894874,0.00044175136,0.014176375,0.00032534887,0.00031913974,0.31053522,0.5459016,0.1188958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008192331,0.000023366552,0.043093298,0.00044590214,0.00004222977,0.00013208734,0.006115875,0.00021351317,0.0008645148,0.005375225,0.9436141,0.00007166734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99510527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10509769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10509769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16121116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7625407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238264043","doi":"10.7202/1027267ar","title":"Henri Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, jurisprudence, doctrine, Collection Alter Ego, 17 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1327 pages, ISBN 2-89127-658-2 Hélène Dumont, Anne-Marie BOISVERT (dir.), La voie vers la Cour pénale internationale : tous les chemins mènent à Rome /The Highway to the International Criminal Court: All Roads Lead to Rome, Les journées Maximilien-Caron 2003, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2004, 616 pages, ISBN 2-89400-187-8 Hubert Reid, Claire Carrier, Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et doctrine, 20 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1704 pages, ISBN 2-89127-646-9","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.01839942350318345,"score_gpt":0.2639160330164789,"score_spread":0.24551660951329546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238264043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056341867,0.47573164,0.0026755063,0.033707056,0.0077498937,0.00014484781,0.0020732027,0.0005543228,0.47680008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012365982,0.19941898,0.0035053676,0.010174779,0.002324325,0.0002695908,0.0012316392,0.0004530418,0.7702564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978192,0.00037414805,0.00014584346,0.00030812641,0.0011559244,0.00019671067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.00032596855,0.000109335415,0.0000626853,0.0005483783,0.000086203545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001370174,0.001688203,0.00073372736,0.0032250984,0.0034445387,0.0051857657,0.001700308,0.0031780575,0.054842524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00289777,0.00090589176,0.00046379174,0.004311784,0.0031346509,0.0056825276,0.0017130524,0.004631806,0.03268988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007337149,0.000006768975,0.00005233904,0.00017609326,0.0000020601647,0.000024968072,0.00064878626,0.000063717845,0.00007568254,0.028742464,0.93598735,0.03421237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002766828,0.0000029532637,0.00036749162,0.00025008942,0.0000015490555,0.000041711948,0.00021499042,0.000017574144,0.000043197466,0.0021560371,0.99689364,0.000007975744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3685977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39779475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6314023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01547454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01255483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73290443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238924844","doi":"10.5040/9781784518899.chapter-016","title":"Canada – Comparisons Chapter written by Professor Bruce Welling, University of Western Ontario, Barrister and Solicitor (Ontario Bar). Note that this chapter on Canada was last updated in October 2012. Please therefore take further professional advice on the latest position before making decisions based on this chapter.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Professional eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.027907135556625558,"score_gpt":0.2581736959272805,"score_spread":0.23026656037065496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238924844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000681091,0.028344842,0.0007937747,0.016847763,0.0065818136,0.00012032408,0.002824141,0.00031128127,0.94349486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022877527,0.008042153,0.0006312211,0.0018432633,0.00034491316,0.00002828997,0.00094799127,0.00017900916,0.9856954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995214,0.000022526607,0.0000121259845,0.00006198655,0.00031664633,0.0000653676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.000113448106,0.000038593913,0.00003409388,0.0007570904,0.00017611483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003318457,0.00068410486,0.00040327062,0.0019197875,0.0043849424,0.0032017073,0.00075202837,0.0012035588,0.15384899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014517336,0.00037207236,0.00026883784,0.0030594075,0.0010138829,0.001640329,0.00095777836,0.001700724,0.041092496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002474357,0.0000027129297,0.000033204677,0.000033317698,4.531124e-7,0.0000120247,0.00016331933,0.000022507727,0.00004531872,0.004464749,0.9805355,0.014684429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.3345205e-7,6.073461e-7,0.0001781306,0.000044597717,4.161891e-7,0.00001136349,0.00007056494,0.000007979331,0.000016858721,0.00037262274,0.99929476,0.0000017854098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72344863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9296676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27655137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022132795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033538416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238986525","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007402","title":"Reporting to the Human Rights Committee: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Obligation; Political science; Law; Politics; Treaty; General assembly; International human rights law; Right to property","score_opus":0.03068383240583386,"score_gpt":0.3195047538595294,"score_spread":0.28882092145369553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238986525","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109508805,0.038417727,0.001218102,0.55736035,0.006412612,0.0006911899,0.0024154228,0.00023284351,0.283743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6963127,0.05648406,0.0026804185,0.10245958,0.0012025324,0.00037689914,0.0016180979,0.00043567043,0.1384301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95284116,0.009073181,0.0023135652,0.0027374357,0.021811163,0.0112234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.861325,0.02976801,0.0070117502,0.0051353197,0.06130882,0.035451096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048912674,0.00064485933,0.00076468906,0.0048497063,0.040749177,0.021622565,0.007473571,0.008651818,0.018833447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10204143,0.0012207325,0.00068309275,0.018280098,0.014129333,0.005783969,0.008610617,0.010232151,0.0014677382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012657726,0.00024953048,0.020324824,0.00072023296,0.00004961694,0.0020774116,0.13121757,0.00036919012,0.0004091905,0.09354173,0.62598664,0.12492738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029557184,0.000039340506,0.016716652,0.0006924167,0.000024847192,0.00025108302,0.08954315,0.00013625484,0.00020375756,0.0011021361,0.89115417,0.00010666958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17538452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17538452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40679786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95643705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239659277","doi":"10.5040/9781474202930.ch-005","title":"From Formalism to Reasonable Justification: The Transformation of Canadian Administrative Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.11289508212781757,"score_gpt":0.30924344321833974,"score_spread":0.19634836109052217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239659277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065586977,0.022885386,0.045574617,0.07133126,0.0010864988,0.0000850763,0.00070308236,0.00018011392,0.8515952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7473227,0.02112092,0.04605904,0.008501329,0.0008688141,0.00018681755,0.00055942603,0.000546969,0.174834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285126,0.0025675618,0.0002267463,0.000618286,0.0028033496,0.0009326906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929414,0.003537024,0.00014942203,0.0007173329,0.0022623776,0.00039247546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008146808,0.0008342318,0.0008760819,0.0039770287,0.010226888,0.014942003,0.0033267096,0.004232819,0.011836907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024389306,0.0010004401,0.00071215373,0.007161354,0.035877388,0.0074766064,0.0032881487,0.00799958,0.0009740647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013621187,0.0000015349908,0.000020141611,0.00000892965,0.0000010294056,0.000007862208,0.00058476446,0.00022332752,0.0000074160407,0.9907341,0.005617021,0.0027925167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004111933,0.000001656462,0.00019872446,0.00013519585,0.000004126126,0.000012020871,0.0005140794,0.0008734325,0.000033728287,0.8813084,0.11689748,0.000017046334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9461694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95010185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11437394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11437394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14244752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8298449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239670633","doi":"10.1017/9781316417119","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Criminal justice; Misconduct; Law; Political science; Criminology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03544369850264419,"score_gpt":0.2538950697789851,"score_spread":0.21845137127634093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239670633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0173294,0.12753946,0.0024960893,0.15231702,0.0056014513,0.000028329707,0.00022193226,0.00012039604,0.6943459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41043535,0.0934004,0.0019284221,0.061673228,0.004567919,0.00012050247,0.00035117468,0.00018499904,0.42733803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693453,0.0009272616,0.00008450848,0.00023477264,0.0014198005,0.00039908188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947017,0.0035755066,0.0002887375,0.00052628387,0.00056434027,0.00034345852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002773634,0.0003314053,0.00041648318,0.0013035366,0.0037198383,0.0069390424,0.00081239326,0.0024755874,0.006166522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010040446,0.00025907572,0.00030295,0.0011565909,0.01608824,0.006049222,0.003616402,0.0048469594,0.0020090158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013263972,0.000019516085,0.0006723579,0.00007274662,0.0000058083874,0.00014578889,0.0042458596,0.00014196786,0.00006910428,0.8138322,0.121964276,0.058817133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052081095,0.000015639438,0.0013726404,0.0005778786,0.000004926008,0.00022360818,0.0022460166,0.000096280186,0.00020531955,0.35288128,0.6423573,0.00001391985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003553107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004244412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069390424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037586263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035804282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027270854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240520657","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2467682","title":"Rights-based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Ontario: The Constitutional Framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.023458300275682888,"score_gpt":0.31286957647014974,"score_spread":0.2894112761944668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240520657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19505572,0.0024226606,0.0060558748,0.2053224,0.0003577054,0.00059079874,0.00087667006,0.000080534766,0.5892377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527047,0.00093126507,0.0026964068,0.00707338,0.000110721056,0.0002917284,0.00009666817,0.000027123402,0.036067992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117166,0.0017430616,0.000367581,0.00049790135,0.002354003,0.003865724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913344,0.0033567937,0.00063295296,0.00067031593,0.0020726433,0.0019328373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009196792,0.00034314214,0.0005222873,0.0017454604,0.016887397,0.008312276,0.0032621874,0.0062962207,0.006529991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01867648,0.00058784743,0.00055920647,0.0015078944,0.020083694,0.00421995,0.007031294,0.004195734,0.00023997818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004017367,0.000057562702,0.007989962,0.0001136907,0.000027638805,0.00022557458,0.010113741,0.0010575232,0.00029170676,0.9508125,0.013850991,0.015418923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003186762,0.00011238481,0.06309555,0.0011897066,0.0002837467,0.00026381144,0.03625654,0.0037166725,0.0012582211,0.49638107,0.396893,0.0002305993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94321746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97990143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067435965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067435965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18887177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48928446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241338448","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u43531","title":"Grimes, Hon. Roger (Dale), (born 2 May 1950), MHA (L) Exploits, 1989–2005; Premier, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 2000–03","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Exploit; Geography; History; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.02922701572947382,"score_gpt":0.2897968117371346,"score_spread":0.2605697960076608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241338448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060198857,0.118422784,0.0011664078,0.09536812,0.013786195,0.00013294778,0.027792474,0.0005434622,0.7367677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011180342,0.019417861,0.000309028,0.00267185,0.00047778027,0.000024614712,0.0015054712,0.000079087135,0.9643341],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978393,0.000022751065,0.00001550967,0.000044535205,0.00007844504,0.000054934564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994848,0.00011295205,0.000042922773,0.000017680572,0.00021576702,0.00012593648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047315404,0.0005181358,0.00042587362,0.0016819823,0.0022104029,0.0014072586,0.000743711,0.0007713719,0.18356854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018457237,0.00026184358,0.0001243696,0.0012188664,0.00040108626,0.0014077914,0.0011150021,0.0017378323,0.05904051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010699287,0.000010067608,0.00035788398,0.000040831954,0.0000011803021,0.000112595895,0.00014657358,0.000021832664,0.000020697973,0.0036007587,0.95630574,0.039371077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002803607,0.0000060042025,0.0020369124,0.00010926356,0.0000013191809,0.00016836384,0.00021294532,0.000014281462,0.000055726807,0.0009486235,0.9964372,0.0000065242352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09902382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32148325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019702062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033541466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61409795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241341417","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.545","title":"MIND THE GAP: CANADA'S DIFFERENT CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS OF FAULT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Fault (geology); Criminal procedure; Section (typography); Ambivalence; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037307828059278375,"score_gpt":0.25725847926338236,"score_spread":0.21995065120410398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241341417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22226185,0.012215174,0.010539833,0.24795054,0.0010605286,0.00012196734,0.0010179112,0.00016113945,0.504671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685125,0.0015322542,0.0024168561,0.014188182,0.000088602756,0.000024189658,0.00013290643,0.00003705568,0.013067581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788305,0.0018577426,0.0005538644,0.0013762191,0.013189691,0.0041919346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820801,0.004621081,0.0008839748,0.0008226274,0.00899952,0.0025926712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008285096,0.00024194107,0.00053421094,0.002973525,0.014379774,0.014046659,0.0026417081,0.0037389747,0.0027802638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026302893,0.0003220844,0.0005111334,0.0031823262,0.015894312,0.0042491867,0.0037983258,0.0073538627,0.00012908205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625879,0.000014914566,0.004086175,0.00005561006,0.000014716872,0.00009979101,0.0072121075,0.00061519427,0.00020925203,0.9581921,0.013258425,0.016215391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012100122,0.000119367956,0.08640598,0.0013040396,0.00018508588,0.00030390127,0.043314677,0.0031218727,0.0021558471,0.31385067,0.5486208,0.00049676496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99000776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8638762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1361238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2134567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98765194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241661006","doi":"10.4324/9781003080510-6","title":"Cy près settlements in privacy class actions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Geography; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1585607141219234,"score_gpt":0.3716286158135156,"score_spread":0.21306790169159218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241661006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033747663,0.0029022845,0.0039445367,0.011656731,0.00074703636,0.00007888767,0.000020933196,0.000037665348,0.9772371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2705163,0.0074760127,0.004100414,0.022758743,0.0015935454,0.0003718511,0.00008557765,0.00009957228,0.692998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656314,0.0010287348,0.00009882947,0.00042506514,0.0013230452,0.00056117104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979139,0.0014304013,0.00013740812,0.00014790337,0.00027700272,0.000093370756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038868445,0.0005152161,0.00038867534,0.0013560711,0.006153654,0.007694012,0.0013094809,0.0072948313,0.017224468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072826697,0.00041747713,0.00067270536,0.0009685774,0.007719436,0.0070690108,0.003939069,0.0098670265,0.003403101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004087812,0.000012036056,0.00006342934,0.0000119860115,0.0000012544034,0.0000973222,0.0004117597,0.000109959765,0.00003828981,0.9700772,0.022506751,0.00666591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019325702,0.00005226571,0.0005103292,0.0003358981,0.000012788746,0.0003330916,0.001249147,0.00084355555,0.0005220401,0.33902872,0.657058,0.00003488603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007903701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013253731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017224468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045084357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00431619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05762154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242197345","doi":"10.5040/9781472560391.ch-012","title":"‘Because I Said So!’ Is That Ever Good Enough?—Findings and Reasons in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07963822009162705,"score_gpt":0.3046414681264842,"score_spread":0.22500324803485713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242197345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18732376,0.021004671,0.0018323958,0.3334165,0.0024734125,0.00026379692,0.0015643357,0.00010450933,0.45201674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87166226,0.0075786123,0.001521175,0.024186147,0.00017182133,0.00012682936,0.00029518307,0.00016845317,0.094289534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730042,0.0053370986,0.0008798976,0.0013844292,0.012414175,0.006980147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96134466,0.013452738,0.0020778254,0.0010491061,0.018005822,0.0040698065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019730896,0.00050279225,0.0006289147,0.005942252,0.044374276,0.02266361,0.0043820534,0.0049352422,0.014179283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08335377,0.0011531871,0.0007276804,0.011825216,0.024089191,0.008512116,0.0063935253,0.008080216,0.001072995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004407679,0.000042688276,0.02541183,0.00035512904,0.000028021484,0.0005464617,0.44383544,0.000044988843,0.00014944,0.2629545,0.21799876,0.048588675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131840825,0.000011831443,0.061340373,0.0015942978,0.000058981568,0.00028392646,0.5847873,0.00012816158,0.00020321114,0.013869728,0.33759892,0.00011010835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16667366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16667366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32955638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96654046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242206263","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19611","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Nicky Fortunato <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1502; 2015 ONSC 1845 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera","score_opus":0.06143848215864963,"score_gpt":0.32837721160953137,"score_spread":0.26693872945088176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242206263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063814134,0.023136012,0.0010489454,0.28688836,0.0053268466,0.00016422573,0.0016012767,0.00015417783,0.6752988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037267394,0.0042145,0.00056069694,0.08938087,0.00055535615,0.000074001946,0.0002395396,0.000091494265,0.8676163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770087,0.00027329611,0.000078297584,0.00030533512,0.0009494037,0.0006928302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974841,0.0009146764,0.00013998446,0.000078762736,0.0008993217,0.0004831848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024254,0.00049023994,0.0004448343,0.00094421906,0.01697766,0.007172782,0.0013912454,0.0067800377,0.06631565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085936515,0.00061223796,0.0004859683,0.000887967,0.0038097766,0.0028103509,0.002544,0.007453539,0.011066721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036671016,0.000013168295,0.0010235682,0.000088878485,0.000008460298,0.00019852693,0.0013988018,0.00003179447,0.00014239753,0.058337662,0.9288902,0.009829813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001011835,0.000011515254,0.003340188,0.00030959447,0.000012261572,0.000088588706,0.0020983722,0.000053409145,0.00022425356,0.004272693,0.98955286,0.000026203636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6907179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90024835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014673517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026672307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62220705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242455817","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-07709","title":"Police perceptions of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and its implementation: Ontario case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminology; Humanities; Law; Library science; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.10437374710081586,"score_gpt":0.4620763847836884,"score_spread":0.3577026376828725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242455817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99285126,0.00012756012,0.000044075357,0.00084738794,0.0000074503746,0.000082573075,0.00012465475,0.0000017242545,0.005913271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961669,0.00054303516,0.00014101139,0.00019411494,0.0000070170777,0.00007944898,0.00009274595,0.000003914757,0.002771875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515176,0.0014269693,0.00028870485,0.0002277071,0.0014383532,0.0014663732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876774,0.002734141,0.003737874,0.000468619,0.0035342549,0.0018477377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003134615,0.0002588165,0.00046712536,0.0019020204,0.013682101,0.0028985925,0.0012004474,0.0010939586,0.0023255334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013275674,0.0007841394,0.00037382235,0.0051475484,0.004316608,0.001484521,0.0030349926,0.0016893728,0.00019529129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016055703,0.00038128693,0.40158045,0.00012286597,0.000031611664,0.0018888165,0.57860273,0.00018441516,0.0004632343,0.0024363392,0.0034914925,0.010656197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021374075,0.000136465,0.46954992,0.00010126181,0.000025063622,0.00022021888,0.5207335,0.0002675371,0.00015148778,0.00012815691,0.008634936,0.00003017046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9318251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06817491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080204666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49464595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243055318","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199248179.013.0034","title":"Criminal Process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Criminal justice; Process (computing); Criminology; Sociology; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08559882581464091,"score_gpt":0.39542365208355035,"score_spread":0.30982482626890945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243055318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026848642,0.00167303,0.0040413975,0.0052449116,0.00035849537,0.00007930826,0.000109181434,0.00004492114,0.98576385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28067765,0.0056530563,0.0057282825,0.0074097887,0.0005400482,0.0003007891,0.0005060036,0.00012893768,0.6990554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580836,0.0010812422,0.00023444035,0.00076481386,0.00157078,0.0005403522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766505,0.0006923846,0.00020173287,0.0005035832,0.00071572297,0.00022156126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428889,0.0005445059,0.00043114278,0.0025128734,0.006925262,0.008187147,0.0014879112,0.004011762,0.0526335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008227868,0.00020401903,0.00053100585,0.001981023,0.0071804947,0.005952124,0.0059418213,0.0032187202,0.010584357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002310571,0.000007943971,0.00015695403,0.000021742842,0.0000011856813,0.000056809862,0.0010119069,0.00004463797,0.000019193316,0.97339815,0.012910151,0.012369095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004587467,0.000013341845,0.0006324157,0.0002792159,0.0000037197449,0.0002893213,0.0017865915,0.00018749665,0.00013629072,0.27674717,0.7199093,0.000010498313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010551514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011641676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052854386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067800377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17607659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244171339","doi":"10.3138/9781442630116","title":"Implementing and Working with the Youth Criminal Justice Act across Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05342773392366959,"score_gpt":0.27048694531601164,"score_spread":0.21705921139234205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244171339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12620133,0.03623672,0.0047296076,0.20270993,0.0015947674,0.0005948575,0.001816837,0.0003645628,0.6257514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5414746,0.026478903,0.0066605676,0.01580214,0.00012811745,0.00020927547,0.00097259873,0.00023738819,0.4080364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153286,0.00084017054,0.00021031924,0.00037189195,0.0035005738,0.0035442414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911911,0.00081910664,0.00025559336,0.00017579291,0.004137589,0.0034207993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003506783,0.00042786062,0.00049399777,0.0019865204,0.024055164,0.0118633285,0.0021329701,0.0030057014,0.006004259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010450539,0.0007092698,0.00041411593,0.004341743,0.004837977,0.0017289197,0.0038792805,0.0048803315,0.00078853936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003881411,0.000112842725,0.03101437,0.00033261758,0.0000551157,0.000982471,0.059020467,0.0017230804,0.0007860649,0.13622402,0.45211822,0.3175919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001201576,0.000053238746,0.11605289,0.0007770713,0.000057962156,0.00020664097,0.07555115,0.000698463,0.0005801276,0.005428558,0.800493,0.000088903915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13835187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13835187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5767966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244225838","doi":"10.22215/etd/2001-04791","title":"Designating \"Dangerousness\": implications of indeterminacy in Canada's dangerous offender provisions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04754216035098004,"score_gpt":0.34378178603086584,"score_spread":0.2962396256798858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244225838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35925448,0.0020661368,0.027930299,0.119707495,0.00044646545,0.0005904536,0.00079021486,0.00015897612,0.4890554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98313427,0.00029953528,0.0039125956,0.0039000206,0.00004603148,0.000065802495,0.00004475391,0.000031128584,0.008565792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774445,0.0055365064,0.0010547091,0.0021880805,0.0080120405,0.0057640653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94398856,0.029890906,0.0026686639,0.002842461,0.016949072,0.0036602996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018414063,0.00055296277,0.0010497491,0.0034486267,0.025625987,0.018339165,0.0051687704,0.0070237312,0.0051085595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08549491,0.0009810864,0.00084094144,0.0035646237,0.04019961,0.006632204,0.006817662,0.011162684,0.00018375968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036602232,0.000017428267,0.004820017,0.000055491757,0.000014659579,0.00012101849,0.008876603,0.0012211307,0.00016622645,0.972784,0.0040532933,0.007833634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014857062,0.00007919951,0.032659266,0.0008844799,0.0003098488,0.00016510012,0.034799304,0.007907857,0.0020291756,0.8391273,0.0815654,0.000324453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9503911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.970153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10170248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10170248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20583108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7379066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245173030","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2235669","title":"Prescribing Greater Protection for Rights: Administrative Law and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Administrative law; Human rights; Right to property; Business","score_opus":0.02980456805583189,"score_gpt":0.2709683516265878,"score_spread":0.24116378357075588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245173030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027523313,0.0069264914,0.0042545325,0.5209577,0.004672411,0.0004635475,0.0012588997,0.00026372276,0.43367934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48483673,0.0062973285,0.018344563,0.33818322,0.002610118,0.00047596492,0.001004875,0.00038480997,0.14786237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.942906,0.0073135993,0.0030911225,0.004327048,0.02882451,0.01353762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169389,0.028080584,0.004369461,0.0049863434,0.032391198,0.013233443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031786133,0.00078421447,0.0011089161,0.004109131,0.016978424,0.014985038,0.0059681535,0.01952808,0.019374847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115579344,0.0013838394,0.0018299512,0.0043000653,0.015807016,0.006801019,0.006193081,0.021610005,0.001517945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009532474,0.0001231025,0.0049152044,0.0002853636,0.000040809082,0.00019276966,0.0060964045,0.00050581235,0.00075185666,0.5916536,0.34580693,0.049532857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027986418,0.00013113367,0.05495753,0.0024840543,0.00018482568,0.00029828202,0.0059889234,0.0008495141,0.0013204167,0.09285239,0.84013975,0.00051327253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97553205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99105835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107923135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.107923135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4502014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7830408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245675147","doi":"10.5040/9781472560346.ch-006","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms : A ‘Direct Driver’ of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Canada?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.0746993679230497,"score_gpt":0.30367415095886374,"score_spread":0.22897478303581403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245675147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009791337,0.038973946,0.0038932506,0.5233469,0.004797232,0.00018358731,0.00071377656,0.00020279502,0.41809714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46819085,0.035078656,0.009057554,0.1351182,0.002195557,0.00021956147,0.00046593623,0.000495398,0.3491783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627643,0.004607224,0.0009343407,0.0022638277,0.021005863,0.008424378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953183,0.011766522,0.0014416878,0.0014191314,0.02620887,0.005980767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017509146,0.00076851697,0.0011339292,0.007087584,0.024513597,0.02460761,0.005038668,0.012680927,0.012331064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057605702,0.0017103611,0.0007201627,0.010999805,0.025030946,0.006645663,0.0033893597,0.014996826,0.0013806958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015629941,0.000015332396,0.00092845934,0.00011454707,0.000019452256,0.00009833986,0.003864388,0.0002429012,0.00009199219,0.5567262,0.40604407,0.031838674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027942075,0.00001384026,0.0070460937,0.00058953755,0.000037470447,0.00007698238,0.0036382359,0.0005586833,0.00021874178,0.049143244,0.9384849,0.00016433703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23138823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23138823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5598562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8914807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245722510","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2012.0001","title":"Failures in Children’s Protection in Newfoundland and Labrador: From the Hughes (1991) to Markesteyn and Day (2006) Inquiries and Beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.024924525213883594,"score_gpt":0.27886246890319694,"score_spread":0.25393794368931333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245722510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48327175,0.19655588,0.00037924742,0.21001962,0.0005013945,0.00011238149,0.0017051696,0.000056212855,0.1073983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231213,0.05064966,0.00041492525,0.014828856,0.00013116555,0.000081460945,0.0004847545,0.000051178045,0.010236658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98840404,0.0024066342,0.00071518455,0.00090573455,0.0028764247,0.004691921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94832605,0.021321721,0.00977001,0.0019622268,0.014653415,0.003966511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011798379,0.00038680554,0.0006859602,0.00726109,0.018485334,0.011240178,0.004026993,0.0029285874,0.0029554553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028939094,0.00083404814,0.0004205237,0.012377441,0.025279596,0.0054448913,0.0061368267,0.0069003575,0.00021378357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027056737,0.0001164895,0.089540266,0.0027990695,0.00029561837,0.0034948983,0.49979112,0.0008759735,0.00042182277,0.122800075,0.14381784,0.13577631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038087805,0.00008994194,0.32330102,0.0056428453,0.00031402055,0.00056243123,0.33770332,0.00013225873,0.0011315829,0.0031654565,0.32767582,0.00024317464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99720675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25929484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25929484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18622364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.859113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246569697","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274260.003.0009","title":"Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Business","score_opus":0.04007442190304661,"score_gpt":0.28126322383446534,"score_spread":0.24118880193141873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246569697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025326358,0.0034334552,0.00048293857,0.005571913,0.00043434493,0.000053092524,0.0067006717,0.00024192741,0.9805489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015736595,0.002654097,0.0008338694,0.001397371,0.000046625944,0.000022380484,0.0022986762,0.000104604165,0.9769058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930584,0.000023094106,0.000016054131,0.000102900936,0.00035075532,0.00020140609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912983,0.00003479165,0.000019227116,0.0000320493,0.0006357171,0.0001484978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023766112,0.00048620004,0.00035285685,0.0016708894,0.0077329655,0.0041455445,0.0009325489,0.0010587707,0.26755154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094330637,0.0002842048,0.00033712375,0.0028478615,0.0007865105,0.0009828082,0.0011003022,0.0011798469,0.036110703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028916862,0.000023305724,0.0017395621,0.00023089332,0.000008280348,0.0003442148,0.0007936701,0.00027131595,0.00035685414,0.099190876,0.779858,0.11715405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019735019,0.0000020890964,0.0009311635,0.000052642805,0.0000021114654,0.000040882493,0.00022112209,0.00005174176,0.000083954015,0.0007485181,0.9978587,0.0000051247503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9690113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26755154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04076783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06553292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246814161","doi":"10.7202/1021771ar","title":"Avis de congé chez les commis de magasin","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05393345813758487,"score_gpt":0.3097705559380063,"score_spread":0.2558370978004214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246814161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5055931,0.02688149,0.00091600546,0.32032666,0.0053170375,0.00020564966,0.0011350912,0.00007836993,0.13954657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6388859,0.008598526,0.0008833773,0.03999771,0.00060768717,0.00015208952,0.00033603594,0.00005120214,0.31048742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989819,0.00018394194,0.0000341509,0.00015261107,0.00025764236,0.0003897328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985875,0.00045657592,0.0002051095,0.000039459934,0.000263845,0.00044762794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014086631,0.00025178958,0.0002038178,0.0003417253,0.008771949,0.0015577801,0.00076832774,0.0038171855,0.012599711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00408262,0.00026089215,0.00018669122,0.00050992245,0.0010706236,0.00096657424,0.0013798422,0.004339985,0.0015002149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004982136,0.00018364516,0.098016374,0.000518071,0.00006713346,0.00961846,0.07854264,0.00030856644,0.0054108766,0.06291878,0.5934664,0.15045086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036343834,0.00019331495,0.12796304,0.0005566082,0.000036667396,0.0012279956,0.05143969,0.00032296235,0.0017439877,0.0017232455,0.8146929,0.00006310359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71449584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9125745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71449584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008371416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011791942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5743711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247566433","doi":"10.1163/9789004355972_013","title":"Slow and Not-So-Steady: Canada’s Long Journey toward Protecting Children from Corporal Punishment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Political science; Law; Human rights; Supreme court; Constitution; Government (linguistics); House of Commons; Punishment (psychology); Convention; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06009175591358088,"score_gpt":0.2816462978030799,"score_spread":0.22155454188949905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247566433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01411983,0.12408827,0.002197043,0.23827626,0.0030079,0.000082242,0.0006014288,0.000093001494,0.61753404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36505976,0.17224167,0.0063507142,0.06682742,0.00094086945,0.00010096929,0.00041262977,0.0002893361,0.3877767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996657,0.0003365989,0.0000464376,0.00021282033,0.001979161,0.0007679414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708205,0.00076673,0.00009005075,0.000081569735,0.001366889,0.00061262486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021426813,0.00046842295,0.0004294485,0.0019595276,0.017315593,0.011911412,0.0016288141,0.0035085632,0.007687328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045987763,0.0003541984,0.00023847146,0.0039265873,0.015211304,0.0032558846,0.0021142059,0.0069189724,0.0007007445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008605698,0.000013074132,0.0007704614,0.00019463529,0.000008134985,0.0002100469,0.01295282,0.00017367442,0.0001112927,0.6406766,0.2681579,0.07672267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003061141,0.000005293315,0.0014553294,0.00054533593,0.0000082142715,0.00006571545,0.005216138,0.00008185271,0.00011267142,0.018828275,0.97365904,0.000019159083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14197743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14197743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.321203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99518454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248185039","doi":"10.4324/9780203727850-10","title":"Restorative justice implemented: the Canadian and Belgian case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0822843929015191,"score_gpt":0.35251850281402647,"score_spread":0.2702341099125074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248185039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12837872,0.06248233,0.0012910233,0.10643849,0.0026981847,0.00016550545,0.0014218882,0.00009219808,0.69703174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71858144,0.020572973,0.002125641,0.01217647,0.0003236885,0.000082452556,0.00048633214,0.00011168041,0.24553935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937994,0.00066475273,0.00008137278,0.0003501646,0.0018893316,0.0032149695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983767,0.00030485826,0.00007760452,0.00005238105,0.0008293725,0.0003589786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027535483,0.00077136524,0.0006307831,0.003078497,0.025803132,0.008895941,0.0035674532,0.0067479103,0.0078025735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006802105,0.00051845197,0.0009062803,0.0056044986,0.008459686,0.00142358,0.0026696331,0.0052876878,0.00047987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079864716,0.00007858387,0.005494896,0.00015035667,0.000068278176,0.0015191163,0.013856659,0.002004706,0.00020142389,0.64912975,0.2747207,0.052695587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004365963,0.000025963618,0.039336942,0.00058480655,0.00011355713,0.0008627737,0.030243661,0.0009944509,0.00042449895,0.022834737,0.9043754,0.00015948205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99668163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99875844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18106908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18106908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24351345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94984376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248566805","doi":"10.7202/1022627ar","title":"Le code criminel et les unions ouvrières","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08118531510652602,"score_gpt":0.3298272211039969,"score_spread":0.2486419059974709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248566805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16375168,0.03998663,0.005845384,0.10741497,0.0042278995,0.00013358427,0.0023699568,0.0001447275,0.6761251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6554854,0.017666182,0.0026341681,0.014338964,0.001020723,0.00013061154,0.00072809536,0.00014872685,0.30784708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926118,0.00080529886,0.00018645258,0.000397822,0.0041673207,0.0018313361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933416,0.002527943,0.00072266196,0.00029346225,0.0023364453,0.0007778434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024608183,0.00032930085,0.00040266922,0.0033540893,0.0128660975,0.0052268184,0.0009363577,0.0028416568,0.008562398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014715127,0.0003593824,0.00037969573,0.0053969645,0.0086394185,0.0020058411,0.002211298,0.0039533526,0.0008840354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009024742,0.000029980929,0.016873207,0.00018882487,0.000015913976,0.0005512126,0.032270167,0.00046440933,0.000474667,0.74719214,0.12762472,0.07422458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001275648,0.00002932632,0.04689295,0.0005186212,0.000019255613,0.00029103027,0.015854664,0.00028268728,0.00070258667,0.018454049,0.9168801,0.00006196304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8730798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9325898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8730798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029573234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046668705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25533533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248870123","doi":"10.5040/9781472561145.ch-003","title":"Tapping Reeve, Coverture and America’s First Legal Treatise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Tapping; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03222923112311438,"score_gpt":0.25783515834891585,"score_spread":0.22560592722580147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248870123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068440665,0.054219604,0.0005996935,0.058595285,0.001341049,0.000018174107,0.00013129921,0.000022747205,0.87822807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30095938,0.027438488,0.00094438234,0.05098264,0.0016819395,0.000120596225,0.00016405951,0.00010099012,0.61760765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848515,0.00041453599,0.000032143955,0.00018363721,0.00061038695,0.00027419647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989838,0.0005763858,0.000060311348,0.000070704904,0.000235889,0.00007291837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010313272,0.00035789236,0.0004200087,0.0016486493,0.008386162,0.0070750318,0.0008159695,0.0044636223,0.008947209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037338927,0.0003358315,0.00028049777,0.0012605373,0.011173863,0.004518814,0.0022968529,0.0072282287,0.0013513081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005975393,0.000010958352,0.00018796977,0.000035215824,0.0000036965973,0.00008867935,0.0061966884,0.000032001288,0.000051190516,0.87187207,0.11063423,0.010881451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042993615,0.0000045902934,0.0006531262,0.0002741303,0.000004639081,0.000059414393,0.0016730216,0.000026833366,0.00007474548,0.052630685,0.94458604,0.000008466691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124483034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2800214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124483034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008682722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077799726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24751693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249036407","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100805","title":"Crimes Judged","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06634229812553699,"score_gpt":0.3286206930148595,"score_spread":0.26227839488932253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249036407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004927729,0.00040588717,0.0009548111,0.0015008814,0.00062082347,0.000057793128,0.00041397393,0.000054191936,0.99106383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070878886,0.00076270086,0.0007371245,0.0009446848,0.00022650325,0.000045424073,0.00066878134,0.000054541073,0.9256814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855226,0.00016071954,0.000054360742,0.0002195804,0.0007229998,0.0002900328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935776,0.000061945924,0.000056407458,0.000071310875,0.0002995559,0.0001531097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056182937,0.00050851656,0.00036748216,0.0015323871,0.002128106,0.0036815405,0.00092446525,0.0009938618,0.07823665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026717403,0.00016354234,0.0003613421,0.0008144156,0.0008963413,0.0013286056,0.0012905379,0.0018280318,0.020671641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040594605,0.000100147554,0.0031286625,0.000084078936,0.000020635223,0.00032666267,0.0015499115,0.00024844953,0.0008733521,0.4387408,0.34607384,0.2088128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005854648,0.00004407739,0.0048103877,0.00015154011,0.000013547232,0.00041644706,0.0013509328,0.00024422104,0.0007902649,0.037750658,0.9544073,0.0000148470435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069834925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022518367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07823665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014786328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022086715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26172763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249580651","doi":"10.7202/1027850ar","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud, Code civil du Québec et Code de procédure civile, 2000-2001, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2000, pagination multiple, ISBN 2-89127-509-8 Henri Brun, Pierre Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, jurisprudence et doctrine, 13 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 1187 pages, ISBN 2-89127-502-0 Commission des Nations Unies pour le droit commercial international, Annuaire, Volume XXIX : 1998, New York, Nations Unies, 1999, 469 pages, ISBN 92-1-133620-1 et Rapport de la Commission des Nations Unies pour le droit commercial international sur les travaux de sa trente-deuxième session, 17 mai-4 juin 1999, New York, Nations Unies, 1999, 62 pages, ISSN 0251-9151 Nicole Duplé, Droit constitutionnel : principes fondamentaux, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 1 édition 2000, 545 pages, ISBN 2-89127-505-5 André Gouron, Juriste et droits savants : Bologne et la France médiévale, Aldershot, Ashgate-Variorum, Collected Studies Series, 2000, x + 304 pages, ISBN 0-86078-816-4 Luc Huppé, Le régime juridique du pouvoir judiciaire, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 246 pages, ISBN 2-89127-520-9 Dominique Loslier, Marie-Andrée Miquelon et Sylvie Théoret, Mesure disciplinaire et non disciplinaire 1982-1998, 4 édition, Collection Atout-Maître, Montréal, SOQUIJ, 1999, 793 pages, ISBN 2-7642-0118-4 Ejan Mackaay (dir.), Les certitudes du droit, Montréal, Thémis, 2000, 278 pages, ISBN 2-89400-126-6 Mary Jane Mossman (dir.), La montée en puissance des juges : ses manifestations, sa contestation / The Judiciary as Third Branch of Government: Manifestations and Challenges to Legitimacy, Montréal, Thémis, 1999, 468 pages, ISBN 2-89400-135-5 Ouvrage collectif, Théories et émergence du droit : pluralisme, surdétermination et effectivité, Montréal, Thémis, 1998, 266 pages, ISBN 2-8027-1140-7 Solange Pelletier, Injonction 1987-1998, 3 édition, Collection Atout-Maître, Montréal, SOQUIJ, 1999, 455 pages, ISBN 2-7642-0113-3 Service de la formation permanente, Barreau du Québec, Développements récents en droit familial 126, Montréal, Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1999, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-368-2","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Police Service","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02278431880880574,"score_gpt":0.2661045867963369,"score_spread":0.24332026798753117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249580651","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002484209,0.65799546,0.002603595,0.07893381,0.01723892,0.0001578914,0.005227314,0.0004558872,0.23490295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024812352,0.19199389,0.0025412508,0.013107714,0.0016098457,0.00022968,0.0025744305,0.00046491687,0.7626659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983254,0.00024310916,0.000070040136,0.00031790553,0.0007821703,0.00026134364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832183,0.00035115477,0.00008351397,0.00006123149,0.001027191,0.00015506934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014739942,0.0019863842,0.0008744839,0.003272592,0.0063299024,0.006958726,0.0020382633,0.0039667194,0.07572591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040031346,0.0008579105,0.0005098656,0.006170267,0.0023270173,0.005324783,0.0018473874,0.0044216285,0.01852222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013700674,0.00001843265,0.000469081,0.0001656406,0.0000058831642,0.00004127574,0.00088395545,0.00010990134,0.00007177325,0.011751841,0.9542097,0.032258883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004610385,0.0000032058847,0.0019151248,0.00028670355,0.000003576034,0.000043273874,0.0006703728,0.00005551417,0.00006978088,0.0009734515,0.99596065,0.00001373983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90827703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9423904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9242741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028688816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03310383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25332844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250209088","doi":"10.7202/1027241ar","title":"Claude Dallaire, La mise en oeuvre des dommages exemplaires sous le régime des Chartes, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2 édition, Montréal, 1995, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2003, 377 pages, ISBN 2-89127-583-7 Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), La solitude en droit privé, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2002, 302 pages, ISBN 2-89400-152-5 Madeleine MAILHOT, Les bons mots du civil et du pénal, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002, 296 pages, ISBN 2-89127-581-0","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Art history","score_opus":0.02109684088473684,"score_gpt":0.2507895418561821,"score_spread":0.22969270097144523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250209088","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018698164,0.6875061,0.0017571666,0.06577546,0.010850738,0.000056179208,0.0005915556,0.00016527883,0.23142774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02646775,0.4363365,0.0016303962,0.010300598,0.0023605004,0.000089458554,0.00058946613,0.00025325603,0.521972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980319,0.0004363089,0.00012692744,0.0002888724,0.00091285317,0.00020303654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900013,0.00028416715,0.00011326264,0.00004293757,0.00044634836,0.00011316137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016055248,0.00084209046,0.00053927087,0.0014522508,0.0024956355,0.005816269,0.0012854334,0.0033152874,0.03984062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004219988,0.00049628917,0.0004004536,0.003336988,0.0028087278,0.0059622074,0.0017980848,0.0035674316,0.015311853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024165563,0.000013656551,0.0004314546,0.00048236825,0.000007054714,0.000084388754,0.0037772744,0.0001038635,0.0001089311,0.031416602,0.8642773,0.099272944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025707607,0.0000037652153,0.00073202146,0.00028969106,0.0000023175592,0.000071433344,0.0006434835,0.0000145091335,0.00003653246,0.00073864206,0.99745756,0.000007544581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3229365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31215963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010139683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009988901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64211357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253056947","doi":"10.3138/9781442630116-011","title":"6. The Implementation of the Youth Criminal Justice Act in Newfoundland and Labrador: No Problem?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.034397820982944534,"score_gpt":0.2768044702031529,"score_spread":0.24240664922020838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253056947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056271874,0.09024134,0.00051434594,0.2919498,0.005229841,0.000110364366,0.00067043485,0.0001172481,0.6055393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06542246,0.057954423,0.0020477748,0.12931278,0.0011574277,0.00019597849,0.0010241751,0.00017486948,0.74271005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958164,0.00073452725,0.00020031387,0.0002605643,0.0014324575,0.001555707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966355,0.0010065521,0.00026329258,0.00013852386,0.00147427,0.0004818809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038110006,0.0004880225,0.00046477048,0.0009792816,0.009227375,0.007494976,0.0019923523,0.0069662626,0.008897018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005691906,0.000479278,0.0006334791,0.0014577238,0.006040853,0.0035907968,0.0018510716,0.008061401,0.002370695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008621027,0.000025354997,0.0012380601,0.00032607373,0.000011861138,0.00025596019,0.0062208287,0.00018428665,0.000082947896,0.10764896,0.8358597,0.04813734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008315629,0.000016715303,0.0058427216,0.0015876514,0.000020222855,0.00013786534,0.0046083904,0.00005648984,0.00015559312,0.003242426,0.9842933,0.000030370087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9019772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96725655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9633429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036657076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09237887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26596695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253206351","doi":"10.3138/temp-utlj-barkow","title":"LAW VERSUS POLITICS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Discretion; Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Legal doctrine; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.04343393329329004,"score_gpt":0.2977326394517626,"score_spread":0.25429870615847255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253206351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068278676,0.05052757,0.0064721745,0.26433128,0.0035148489,0.000027014898,0.00012184033,0.000044222812,0.6681332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7555348,0.029285604,0.0024896269,0.11959103,0.009351981,0.00018060699,0.00014260237,0.0001745314,0.08324927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463886,0.0026441312,0.00012612369,0.00071928214,0.0010528356,0.0008187482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951807,0.0030126069,0.0003050589,0.00044642895,0.00064295024,0.0004123064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005345895,0.00045226456,0.00064610934,0.0015967885,0.007056515,0.010196789,0.000966664,0.00520753,0.009180255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011771047,0.00028818412,0.00032305435,0.0019895714,0.044613928,0.012325055,0.003925953,0.0070601306,0.0016577006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040337222,0.0000032548594,0.00008259065,0.00001997103,0.0000013044586,0.0000129827495,0.00074464554,0.000012133714,0.000017992064,0.9905608,0.00617219,0.002367963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011448371,0.000019776164,0.0005400126,0.00029463603,0.000006543459,0.0000667762,0.003076616,0.00006290651,0.000089498164,0.66693413,0.32888874,0.000008827148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009822934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007889342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010196789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005987659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007129522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04344374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254083702","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3694046","title":"Generation and Deployment of Common Law Police Powers by Canadian Courts and the Double-Edged Charter.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Common law; Software deployment; Engineering","score_opus":0.028941471522397573,"score_gpt":0.29046797558901405,"score_spread":0.2615265040666165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254083702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8022679,0.00095793925,0.0009897784,0.01003907,0.00013907904,0.0001621805,0.0028933773,0.000030037738,0.18252057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99085367,0.00016290236,0.00031266385,0.00022925729,0.000009620956,0.000009434177,0.00017924832,0.000006510144,0.008236719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694425,0.00035716564,0.00006884916,0.0003417073,0.0011084209,0.0011795339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916716,0.0014303218,0.0013215994,0.00044592863,0.0038304054,0.0013001239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026397677,0.00018428714,0.00016312215,0.002578048,0.0055110534,0.0037924806,0.0010729996,0.0009161745,0.007562218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02544109,0.00018333424,0.00018227013,0.0032799186,0.0027616972,0.0014042003,0.0019299457,0.0010946998,0.00034693163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003578023,0.00015047073,0.35019973,0.00011567718,0.00008722018,0.000525445,0.04737804,0.0026458288,0.0009870708,0.3659464,0.080214694,0.1513916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005394182,0.00006859832,0.81794953,0.00016322311,0.00008700717,0.00010598415,0.047442168,0.0035175625,0.0008488546,0.020106664,0.1095505,0.000106025494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044808887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044808887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06796912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32511276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254710195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.119","title":"CHOICES AND APPROACHES: ANTI-TERRORISM LAW AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM AFTER SEPTEMBER 11","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Civil liberties; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Civil society; Commission; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Counter terrorism; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06355987544218396,"score_gpt":0.2555994116095605,"score_spread":0.19203953616737657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254710195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15160084,0.05727357,0.0015247634,0.41058597,0.0016692515,0.00013214497,0.00028168323,0.000024155197,0.37690765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355072,0.010849122,0.0010273794,0.03092697,0.00012591384,0.000081905266,0.00006022837,0.00002075223,0.021400537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96812826,0.01638629,0.0015020818,0.0016333251,0.0054947273,0.006855243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636956,0.011578381,0.0017454595,0.0008066487,0.0052291946,0.00427088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013396108,0.00044838828,0.0006418882,0.0035063382,0.040986035,0.03194589,0.0025576986,0.015443586,0.005305306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024544472,0.00075148494,0.0006985222,0.0055271387,0.06415565,0.009198551,0.010675411,0.009693734,0.00048652638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004584845,0.000029277206,0.004161348,0.000114158844,0.000019195224,0.00074557477,0.091262355,0.000255119,0.00007449834,0.87581,0.016457962,0.011024736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054424654,0.000051604253,0.02960543,0.0021239135,0.000036708487,0.00033749573,0.3915025,0.00039775835,0.0002586468,0.09389383,0.48144245,0.0002952783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9416293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9687909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14457503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104755215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255165646","doi":"10.7202/1021482ar","title":"Congédiement illégal — Délai de la plainte en vertu des articles 21a et 21b de la Loi des Relations ouvrières de Québec","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03131557184515169,"score_gpt":0.32409260854840205,"score_spread":0.29277703670325034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255165646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018954987,0.034666654,0.0011974785,0.12585619,0.011363723,0.0005035821,0.0017725094,0.00015928352,0.8055256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12661162,0.0123010995,0.0016445698,0.048866436,0.0035073082,0.00039287665,0.00088350434,0.00010378845,0.80568874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863864,0.0014055333,0.0008736044,0.0010464373,0.0074597104,0.0028283896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791709,0.005598676,0.0012619416,0.0011053355,0.01084985,0.002013338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006541238,0.00066212955,0.0007317254,0.0033034426,0.016134612,0.012444114,0.0023309693,0.011550259,0.014456491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017593829,0.00072515494,0.00074711605,0.002249878,0.010618357,0.0015176465,0.0024686262,0.006924488,0.003193811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000715216,0.00006387848,0.0035737602,0.00026464317,0.00003226367,0.0013005876,0.0055053798,0.0002330791,0.0010164741,0.09474123,0.86613077,0.027066454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010030293,0.00002296104,0.011014722,0.0003258612,0.000014812267,0.00011465847,0.0018268301,0.00009221207,0.00034565284,0.0013994329,0.9847852,0.00004766862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.918887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95727634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.918887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052520394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08538914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38106394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255172578","doi":"10.21991/c9vt00","title":"The Role of the Federal Court in National Security Issues: Balancing the Charter Against Anti-terrorism Measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; National security; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03150337659570767,"score_gpt":0.2847661601787739,"score_spread":0.2532627835830662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255172578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03889307,0.018049128,0.0026950734,0.76129156,0.003057211,0.00006488436,0.000071978844,0.00004603102,0.17583099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140025,0.005731685,0.002007214,0.058741957,0.0013986261,0.0000445597,0.000037179572,0.00002924234,0.018007115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96375936,0.01838347,0.00093371514,0.002003379,0.007886449,0.007033625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93704146,0.04686708,0.0028321587,0.0015388286,0.007488563,0.0042319805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05165379,0.0003560881,0.0009307611,0.0040199896,0.029867953,0.050378084,0.0047392924,0.029194443,0.0061566033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073302165,0.00087360357,0.0004838666,0.004164132,0.04269401,0.016785914,0.006631698,0.022041103,0.0006249135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036341076,0.000025957632,0.0009548825,0.00008197667,0.000014339869,0.00033885209,0.01042391,0.00026667045,0.00019119425,0.9427778,0.029363068,0.01552505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001133715,0.000084461,0.0103595145,0.0022852693,0.00013602816,0.00027494904,0.06391392,0.0017999428,0.0015993862,0.4971523,0.42200077,0.00028012175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50332564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6456681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06145151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08102092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255256504","doi":"10.7202/1028077ar","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud, Judico, Code of Civil Procedure, Montreal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2000-2001 &amp; 2001-2002, 1215 pages (each), ISBN 2-89127-540-3 H. Brun, P. Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne, législation, jurisprudence et doctrine, 14 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2001, 1237 pages, ISBN 2-89127-537-3 Éric Dunberry, La preuve et l’archivage des documents électroniques, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2000, 148 pages, ISBN 2-89127-517-9 Yvon Duplessis, Jean Hétu, Loi sur les cités et villes, Collection municipale et de droit public, Brossard, Publications CCH Ltée, 2001, 300 pages, ISBN 2-89366-371-0 Ysolde Gendreau (éd.), Les fictions du droit, Fictions in the Law, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2001, 145 pages, ISBN 2-89400-138-X Y. Jégouzo, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques, Annales du droit 2000, Droit public, Paris, Dalloz, 2000, 223 pages, ISBN 2-2470-4157-4 Ouvrage collectif, Code Criminel / Criminal Code, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2001, ISBN 2-89127-542-X Ouvrage collectif, La coopérative d’habitation et la loi, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2000, 314 pages, ISBN 2-89127-482-2","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art history; Art; History","score_opus":0.06405020907221162,"score_gpt":0.30585663854812656,"score_spread":0.24180642947591494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255256504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014891158,0.6392529,0.00439913,0.058533207,0.009824416,0.00008852558,0.0010793586,0.00040345648,0.2849299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030777305,0.27307394,0.0046733753,0.012789975,0.004043063,0.00015829828,0.00076351163,0.0005657856,0.67315483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980013,0.00041612875,0.00008910347,0.00036405982,0.000943882,0.00018546988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998703,0.0005185168,0.00013204696,0.00007806315,0.00045618217,0.00011219661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014158033,0.001479351,0.00070715864,0.0026917756,0.0038807476,0.0057688416,0.0011927589,0.003531066,0.064653374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004899139,0.00076031114,0.000453675,0.0041384855,0.00278936,0.0045322315,0.0018926014,0.0043454403,0.029274773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021686663,0.00001335465,0.00036166748,0.00024765707,0.0000061665796,0.00008467714,0.0012670443,0.00011671681,0.0001408714,0.04807427,0.87496847,0.07469738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025474085,0.0000033830527,0.00067177135,0.00023553861,0.0000020045165,0.00009117964,0.00028322372,0.000035406498,0.0000639299,0.0029906447,0.99561334,0.0000070864467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1680993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22911766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8319007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009469956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008027353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3342417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255663690","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000012232","title":"The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Face (sociological concept); Penal code; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0707177499783157,"score_gpt":0.3285282453521934,"score_spread":0.2578104953738777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255663690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13506755,0.21258417,0.009942957,0.07233627,0.0017848981,0.00009658568,0.0011441059,0.00004246904,0.56700104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84672785,0.12737644,0.0030522486,0.002761282,0.001570044,0.0000855746,0.00046167267,0.000067021356,0.017897788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949108,0.0029488294,0.00023313459,0.00055071403,0.0010623,0.00029425116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749316,0.00693004,0.0016251648,0.00082525867,0.002768348,0.00035802234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913907,0.00021989424,0.00028807038,0.009844463,0.0035973438,0.005300582,0.00059727073,0.0012769343,0.0031023873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020317296,0.00031148622,0.00015783579,0.010511033,0.012413971,0.0076080975,0.0021136678,0.0025831047,0.00043523748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018265657,0.00001294324,0.0023461825,0.00022953383,0.0000109113025,0.00012192473,0.012991737,0.00024742854,0.000079772064,0.91283464,0.010871655,0.0602351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032121632,0.00004217188,0.013286326,0.0014266366,0.000017892871,0.00032801097,0.010717964,0.00035094723,0.00040364123,0.114409156,0.8589833,0.00003072435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013410112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016314803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013410112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008207384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029712303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059548974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255719593","doi":"10.7202/1027004ar","title":"Nabil N. Antaki, Emmanuel Darankoum (dir.), La justice en marche : du recours collectif à l’arbitrage collectif, Les Journées Maximilien-Caron 2006, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2007, 210 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-236-0 Tara Collins, Rachel Grondin, Véronica PlÑERO, Marie Pratte, Marie-Claude ROBERGE (dir.), Droits de l’enfant / Rights of the Child, Actes de la Conférence internationale, Ottawa 2007, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2008, 555 pages, ISBN 978-2-89127-831-7 Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly (dir.), La santé et le bien commun, Droit, biotechnologie et société, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2008, 275 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-251-3 Maurice Martel, Paul Martel, La compagnie au Québec — Les aspects juridiques, Édition spéciale (livre 1), Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, Martel Ltée, 2007, pagination par chapitres, ISBN 978-2-923355-07-8 Louis-V. Sylvestre, Le régime de protection du territoire et des activités agricoles au Québec et la pratique notariale, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2008, 495 pages, ISBN 978-2-89127-883-6 Tribunal des droits de la personne, Barreau du Québec (DIR.), L’accès direct à un tribunal spécialisé en matière de droit à l’égalité : l’urgence d’agir au Québec ? / Access to a Specialized Human Rights Tribunal: an Urgent Need to Act in Quebec?, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2008, 58 pages, ISBN 978-2-89635-144-2","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Art; Cartography; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.015293662422623857,"score_gpt":0.2708860277881537,"score_spread":0.2555923653655298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255719593","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045475998,0.88156736,0.0009460555,0.069793165,0.023838118,0.000038568982,0.00029905027,0.00009931275,0.022963667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071703647,0.8285094,0.0017906487,0.016554382,0.006196779,0.00010386088,0.00042094174,0.00019081908,0.13906272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738735,0.000572781,0.000230018,0.00039804695,0.0011832756,0.000228478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984944,0.00036997156,0.00018531908,0.00003698564,0.00065746694,0.00025582933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003235694,0.0014258587,0.0011191511,0.0017590199,0.0027342872,0.0051353583,0.0012993013,0.0025881627,0.03194697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00519525,0.0006765211,0.00048411457,0.0023669063,0.0018715094,0.0048288004,0.002612864,0.00531707,0.025229674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039888182,0.000010588666,0.00037486455,0.0009554571,0.000012376206,0.00014118572,0.0011031961,0.00006172266,0.00018076641,0.0073822355,0.866358,0.123379685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023941993,0.0000033835954,0.00041703487,0.0003147479,0.0000034536658,0.00018832996,0.00038491705,0.000016846412,0.000044879445,0.00057470216,0.99804246,0.0000069408866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06393924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11553103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067160707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010711989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12713414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255987194","doi":"10.24124/2004/bpgub310","title":"The September crisis: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Anti-Terrorism Act.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015854123049822772,"score_gpt":0.30048735200890037,"score_spread":0.2846332289590776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255987194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14188467,0.025130551,0.0002578355,0.4639064,0.0020367892,0.00013514802,0.003165359,0.00003058442,0.3634526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8375766,0.00892117,0.00024126215,0.05415694,0.0005524221,0.00005689898,0.00059068325,0.00005096093,0.09785307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947537,0.0005127479,0.00010708196,0.00027827497,0.0013695502,0.0029786434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99221885,0.0015567555,0.0005703033,0.00019143909,0.003202107,0.002260491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031371105,0.00042445507,0.00047500798,0.0014249722,0.027627889,0.012023715,0.002765779,0.009335045,0.011002928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016982745,0.0005305692,0.00040232448,0.0029570702,0.008263653,0.003297222,0.0030914918,0.009392031,0.0005828803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034325567,0.00012765765,0.041242525,0.00011620237,0.000103034254,0.0015641898,0.016241565,0.0008025292,0.00025154706,0.2837918,0.6244531,0.03096259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019110709,0.0000547032,0.24039336,0.0011100834,0.0003210771,0.00031188584,0.08603202,0.0013069144,0.000751039,0.042344622,0.626923,0.00026017122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99565816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8748933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12510666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20138082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90771663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256268805","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0032","title":"<i>Charter</i> Remedies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Damages; Harm; Legislature; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Constitution; Habeas corpus; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.06634939697342102,"score_gpt":0.27303228333169144,"score_spread":0.20668288635827042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256268805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013504601,0.0076229325,0.009095486,0.010540057,0.0017897099,0.0001180616,0.00017147223,0.00031145668,0.96900034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1772711,0.014148459,0.01768742,0.017761305,0.0030435983,0.0004152192,0.00050788664,0.0004218965,0.7687431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576557,0.0009420603,0.00022555735,0.0005107557,0.0022140183,0.00034195877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996947,0.0015017099,0.00030498806,0.0005468937,0.00059718086,0.00010224718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033476446,0.00046524988,0.00052942696,0.002154612,0.00219307,0.006290686,0.0020465506,0.0035837013,0.026137736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073413732,0.00034542836,0.00062482717,0.0012711061,0.0092086,0.0040532947,0.0022760439,0.0070290007,0.008181326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000582643,0.000018518052,0.000046886318,0.00009476112,0.0000027429742,0.000045757715,0.000528707,0.00028323542,0.00019397361,0.91109693,0.057664447,0.030018315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008154269,0.000031835047,0.00027430247,0.0006025767,0.000008395401,0.00010804945,0.00015057136,0.0002785238,0.00058259326,0.12743764,0.87049174,0.000025589745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060717035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026137736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048914272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005279315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08743948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281632400","doi":"10.3917/tvii.008.0044","title":"Utilité et limites des objectifs de valeur constitutionnelle sur le plan contentieux","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Titre VII","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10167043375871049,"score_gpt":0.2992539409148618,"score_spread":0.1975835071561513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281632400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37302372,0.0031248224,0.055588596,0.010175456,0.00015030205,0.00025205794,0.00065778085,0.00022657032,0.5568007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699177,0.0007312198,0.013545286,0.0004473145,0.000066441215,0.00028285236,0.00020109868,0.00007891934,0.014728952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9774893,0.008405226,0.0012648569,0.0022823415,0.009403093,0.0011551875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9261594,0.051857967,0.0054735714,0.0062704613,0.00915545,0.0010831838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018219978,0.0005216403,0.00056462607,0.0034823385,0.0023842584,0.010277202,0.0011251336,0.0023503946,0.011769154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050425235,0.00051705434,0.0006133456,0.0022417682,0.013579844,0.00819403,0.005108024,0.003408881,0.0011901486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014111138,0.00007510675,0.019671658,0.00037741545,0.000074056654,0.00018545469,0.02214175,0.00096644845,0.0026042461,0.8896747,0.0015988315,0.06248921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010828207,0.00039135144,0.10180171,0.0026276384,0.0002763014,0.0008006137,0.037159458,0.004800151,0.00920844,0.64532274,0.19727792,0.00022546419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006659222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061134966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018219978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006406543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038895481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096357584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285036526","doi":"","title":"Approche comparative sur l’articulation des sources de protection des droits fondamentaux. Les États d’Amérique du Nord – États-Unis et Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04827481920474505,"score_gpt":0.2794876868798813,"score_spread":0.23121286767513624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285036526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12973993,0.073582165,0.10848776,0.09345096,0.0034337803,0.0007326854,0.009620118,0.00022802131,0.5807246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86567694,0.020310849,0.06124344,0.004485354,0.0011114493,0.0004554921,0.003541986,0.00016021713,0.043014277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895331,0.0035042348,0.00055485143,0.0010840669,0.004455192,0.00086851034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555822,0.021124847,0.0013051352,0.0019364806,0.019512393,0.00053894264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018703576,0.00096246967,0.0013502892,0.026426205,0.0059767766,0.015003201,0.0033566009,0.0037886868,0.018671695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0447532,0.0006750662,0.0015589559,0.023497196,0.0075003263,0.007248682,0.0032679571,0.0032618106,0.000995753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019872762,0.000036996622,0.018166134,0.00093095406,0.0004002638,0.0005570598,0.0241213,0.0021028179,0.0008556687,0.83423305,0.019268228,0.0991288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011909495,0.000116420575,0.0753419,0.01130414,0.0012499609,0.00086812774,0.06026129,0.007455573,0.002662484,0.34787616,0.49254936,0.00019548723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5310724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5812254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46892762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03623131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04382664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94337845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285232790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4139639","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Business; Law; Personal injury; Political science","score_opus":0.019370124000882116,"score_gpt":0.2605029007190654,"score_spread":0.24113277671818328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285232790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067060255,0.012682665,0.0010681107,0.71023834,0.0011042797,0.00009637578,0.001603223,0.000057664194,0.20608915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85372543,0.009770657,0.001219163,0.055943098,0.0008907856,0.000066555054,0.00048290205,0.0000721388,0.07782919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859832,0.0017414493,0.0003271447,0.0006627346,0.0066090496,0.0046764812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95777977,0.014474611,0.0023124947,0.0012641841,0.019126315,0.005042489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012822289,0.0003128302,0.00049583666,0.002560966,0.010145131,0.016436147,0.002373071,0.008881504,0.0148676215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04989476,0.00048467304,0.0005248159,0.0029640645,0.010640121,0.006737136,0.0031025463,0.008483839,0.0011340593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014625244,0.000087926084,0.027785463,0.00019736633,0.000052613777,0.00026479457,0.00613137,0.0012984629,0.000298704,0.46463224,0.42715427,0.07195058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013674516,0.00013176037,0.14859706,0.0021886905,0.00024817238,0.00026737273,0.022174679,0.0034309097,0.0014339569,0.1221194,0.69886917,0.00040207774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.958478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18497364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5874667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285274888","doi":"10.7202/1088250ar","title":"La preuve au soutien du contrôle judiciaire des décrets et des arrêtés d’urgence sanitaire en droit administratif","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026580351040807575,"score_gpt":0.29847303889224247,"score_spread":0.2718926878514349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285274888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16103569,0.00607211,0.034511894,0.063224174,0.0005408199,0.00008069956,0.00012034776,0.00008669804,0.73432755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95454127,0.0012669105,0.0021586746,0.0015934019,0.00013107115,0.000047078862,0.000022106364,0.000049964958,0.04018939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98899746,0.0048858123,0.0003326272,0.0012377052,0.003102951,0.0014435066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98998415,0.0057083745,0.0010704293,0.0008107674,0.0019093918,0.0005168896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00863207,0.000359455,0.00051693607,0.0016828183,0.008556919,0.014702453,0.0011996587,0.004187617,0.006657869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015085467,0.0004806125,0.00049807987,0.0017157993,0.028459057,0.0042658052,0.004128146,0.005548065,0.0005742074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010858142,0.000007732091,0.00089116563,0.000020902087,0.0000050989165,0.00008947559,0.016605543,0.0002705668,0.00018788375,0.9769916,0.0012422794,0.0036769581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042219257,0.00007308272,0.017793156,0.0007446131,0.00005280629,0.00028448104,0.0394601,0.0023718874,0.0018807362,0.57473856,0.36242256,0.00013574491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1812793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.155783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1812793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025485829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02963969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3604483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285547894","doi":"10.7202/1088287ar","title":"Les impasses théoriques et pratiques du contrôle de constitutionnalité canadien","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04619538886680562,"score_gpt":0.34984692042985843,"score_spread":0.3036515315630528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285547894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03874751,0.0113016,0.027469913,0.14083831,0.0009999418,0.00006258031,0.00022241389,0.00010715273,0.78025055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89085966,0.0058998773,0.0028110456,0.008393729,0.0009531959,0.00022183674,0.00006288828,0.000077103345,0.09072062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992712,0.0029175656,0.00014792604,0.0015195981,0.0016457574,0.0010571884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888812,0.008653413,0.00060986634,0.00092385535,0.0007016421,0.00023011783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008938356,0.00070222525,0.000753556,0.0019136482,0.005520095,0.010983404,0.0028780499,0.0058128815,0.019763138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016668407,0.0005427894,0.0010465618,0.0017810854,0.023904234,0.0078365905,0.0042016613,0.0089533,0.0012599449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025615893,0.0000031838965,0.00005206851,0.000006289169,0.0000025939905,0.000010599313,0.00047987665,0.0001417825,0.000007154632,0.997635,0.000867193,0.00079164165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022903138,0.0000145916465,0.0004924758,0.00013360396,0.000020540738,0.00002918815,0.0008774593,0.0014342905,0.00015970139,0.92507106,0.071720175,0.000024023899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024612498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016684398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014279611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006566361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10360634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289463007","doi":"","title":"Sécurité et justice au Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.026635952695675973,"score_gpt":0.27728934493214175,"score_spread":0.25065339223646577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289463007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21597515,0.041704975,0.0025406287,0.20331241,0.0040439693,0.00031207156,0.0072654714,0.00043517663,0.5244102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61552376,0.01594021,0.0013405934,0.0067486167,0.00066969986,0.00010264722,0.001200234,0.00015640879,0.35831794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994541,0.0004898024,0.00011954013,0.0005322883,0.0016105846,0.0027068516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917065,0.0014214786,0.0003276408,0.0001839701,0.0040031546,0.0023573656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017553947,0.00076746824,0.001838498,0.0044655893,0.021536153,0.010166447,0.002038815,0.004260985,0.050227717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009912335,0.000527065,0.00076411065,0.008698588,0.005700667,0.0019975272,0.002721565,0.0073181246,0.0015101373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028366077,0.00018519636,0.023010679,0.0005480215,0.00015773872,0.0010917163,0.007536015,0.0033529403,0.0006314472,0.60038745,0.2524369,0.11037823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016355824,0.00008662125,0.118790105,0.0009118711,0.00010792009,0.00029505807,0.013479106,0.003660409,0.0006344588,0.035857048,0.82581794,0.00019597718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21883467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21883467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36875868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9060411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290189911","doi":"","title":"La réforme du code de procédure civile du Québec","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020040763061136224,"score_gpt":0.2593977219082596,"score_spread":0.23935695884712338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290189911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21630211,0.017537817,0.028498536,0.14277701,0.00606643,0.0011005044,0.0075794663,0.0008362226,0.57930195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6112126,0.0038706907,0.013562751,0.010543662,0.00071558804,0.00060805184,0.001374977,0.00016696614,0.35794467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882951,0.0023814025,0.00049734366,0.0013362489,0.005291334,0.0021986207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98337954,0.00509901,0.00046663856,0.0013885732,0.008513864,0.0011523236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069739195,0.00063408527,0.00095872645,0.0026473224,0.0067759324,0.006642349,0.0019469098,0.006110007,0.013127547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02311087,0.00069876056,0.0011071949,0.002810148,0.0035157523,0.0016484366,0.0011178731,0.0074485983,0.0011846472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017800479,0.00014995082,0.010480038,0.00026612607,0.00011726975,0.0005029952,0.0022574274,0.007052191,0.0019155514,0.7591346,0.13689001,0.081055894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029301702,0.00016084115,0.08035582,0.00077894056,0.00013682069,0.00025771803,0.0015106229,0.013128813,0.0018728649,0.023302386,0.87799644,0.00020562128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98389405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97637516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09813565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09813565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1736096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7120273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290644151","doi":"10.32920/19642794.v1","title":"Sin of Omission - Coded Data and List and Description of Immigration and Refugee Board files in Data Set","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Credibility; Law","score_opus":0.19980529521079823,"score_gpt":0.4022193607713374,"score_spread":0.20241406556053917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290644151","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01910802,0.00009223719,0.0037013926,0.0013026417,0.00044622502,0.004553473,0.9454188,0.00042437387,0.024952875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05172396,0.00022637223,0.017243547,0.0010516561,0.00011942877,0.037849385,0.8529251,0.0006433713,0.03821721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98656,0.0033441046,0.0026913413,0.001311076,0.004702367,0.0013911244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92193377,0.026437549,0.011085044,0.015171019,0.023943283,0.0014293541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008848079,0.0008891344,0.00069520035,0.008566503,0.0037726043,0.0024094332,0.0017481452,0.0020016113,0.07865641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07073197,0.0009183047,0.0004404087,0.010195239,0.0017304949,0.0016426139,0.002897664,0.0025257536,0.033069126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039243678,0.00032253843,0.026457736,0.0006516213,0.00001672347,0.00028727035,0.0042698765,0.0006539313,0.0006555541,0.015925476,0.9197682,0.030598521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015514341,0.000068815265,0.062179543,0.0008606733,0.000015571104,0.0002072539,0.0052331155,0.0006969397,0.002499882,0.0063671856,0.9215873,0.00012851297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049861144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05319774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07865641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005875791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012411534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26313192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291253996","doi":"","title":"New tainted-blood class actions in Québec and Alberta.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Commission; Settlement (finance); Political science; Law; Certification; Public administration; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.044788089395322854,"score_gpt":0.2811699016765171,"score_spread":0.23638181228119426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291253996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50711447,0.016156808,0.0014396358,0.0642326,0.0018001731,0.00046395665,0.0016319279,0.00007084635,0.4070896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8677858,0.0039888476,0.0008897851,0.023618136,0.00017501989,0.00011159838,0.00046801893,0.000015738515,0.10294703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956781,0.0004404098,0.00009247924,0.0003528827,0.0014816618,0.0019544177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959765,0.0010150349,0.00034163025,0.00019832057,0.0012410496,0.001227437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003057145,0.00035945143,0.00028329584,0.0019531911,0.01800898,0.004038538,0.0019003781,0.005540716,0.0052673216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005251503,0.00042297816,0.0005296011,0.0018621641,0.005852626,0.0013063804,0.002519228,0.0054885093,0.00025923658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005626287,0.00050980854,0.16893375,0.00034325023,0.0001610063,0.017540202,0.06898284,0.001655533,0.0017126476,0.38369596,0.23144715,0.12445525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003517655,0.00023424772,0.30988908,0.00075473724,0.0002892424,0.0033548374,0.05850784,0.0018672,0.0016096731,0.011069924,0.61176276,0.00030866312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99774194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061452642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061452642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07224873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4458722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293289980","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7017409","title":"Ontario's Consumption Treatment Services Model: Problematizing Conservative Safe Consumption Site Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Business; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.10786028051701646,"score_gpt":0.32533443625957037,"score_spread":0.2174741557425539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293289980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06036785,0.00063652283,0.034837272,0.15758345,0.00020793676,0.00061002345,0.0007441589,0.000095012176,0.7449177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325809,0.00060359493,0.013444219,0.0051952787,0.000082365674,0.00036642523,0.00019745916,0.00004657879,0.047483124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890694,0.0039532543,0.00028520921,0.00084424927,0.003711016,0.0021369713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473417,0.0018247082,0.0005274897,0.0005476059,0.0015191963,0.00084692484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007053969,0.0004909823,0.00047189376,0.0018495243,0.013114061,0.009973145,0.0031806158,0.0055639697,0.0058744824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009652031,0.0004637051,0.00066608976,0.002395093,0.032841243,0.004405614,0.00348938,0.0046917587,0.00045989384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009634583,0.00001184805,0.0006547662,0.000017580356,0.0000047618473,0.00005998974,0.0043036146,0.0013995095,0.000053667274,0.9881728,0.0035304513,0.0017813105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011693857,0.000038987426,0.0044960463,0.00019463748,0.000045755125,0.00012923777,0.016598163,0.017100252,0.00024254463,0.75039023,0.21054892,0.0000982771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9148412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9255972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12778978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18591861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9271841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294321759","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.9","title":"Legalizing Illegal Mass Surveillance: A Transnational Perspective on Canada’s Legislative Response to the Expansion of Security Intelligence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Legalization; Political science; Legislation; Democracy; National security; Soft law; Public administration; Perspective (graphical); Corporate governance; Law; Political economy; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.02586694613372424,"score_gpt":0.2994757318317242,"score_spread":0.27360878569799996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294321759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19009027,0.0073292437,0.0033607108,0.3147006,0.0010742568,0.00022324022,0.0005038173,0.00006573758,0.48265213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92334056,0.0031576492,0.0017119962,0.044123705,0.00018187538,0.0000686133,0.00014797862,0.000044040677,0.027223598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816852,0.0025353872,0.0004234064,0.0013552674,0.0062038577,0.0077968277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751331,0.007192096,0.0013265723,0.00057894265,0.012309537,0.0034597355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011387785,0.00041608853,0.0005250143,0.00402899,0.035974167,0.01814281,0.0029561932,0.006746942,0.005134104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016492706,0.0004833482,0.0006955754,0.00436003,0.023195198,0.002895532,0.0049493336,0.009481691,0.0002538786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004379113,0.000059741662,0.017693266,0.00015659549,0.00005432852,0.0015876628,0.0865705,0.001171512,0.00082728366,0.81241775,0.06260136,0.016816258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036821082,0.000057336416,0.043964278,0.0011486833,0.00015451408,0.0004968387,0.16106813,0.0020344052,0.001455277,0.027105113,0.7621719,0.00030672376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99597126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22116971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22116971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3235934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9033327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296009488","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4209817","title":"Remedying Unreasonable Delay","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.021686829442083513,"score_gpt":0.30041932320209314,"score_spread":0.27873249376000964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296009488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23546396,0.0031067242,0.2500827,0.09585188,0.008100088,0.00062953326,0.00046464847,0.004829709,0.4014707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392784,0.00048691186,0.018775629,0.0064115734,0.00068574224,0.0000818316,0.00008059612,0.00016961772,0.034029763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401927,0.0009837261,0.00038730202,0.0011069939,0.002355436,0.0011473142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96859854,0.015891671,0.0024955396,0.006886408,0.004372978,0.0017548563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058255466,0.0004909903,0.00069162453,0.0014885099,0.0023231138,0.0031727175,0.002443366,0.006278102,0.0175942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059525233,0.00033134906,0.0005286585,0.00062981294,0.0016837536,0.0035130354,0.0027299086,0.0060822014,0.0024908765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004332465,0.0004859329,0.009678674,0.00029181066,0.000119741606,0.004536675,0.0014143937,0.017450305,0.0073198467,0.63416487,0.0784971,0.24560739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018475114,0.0004554004,0.0020527747,0.0003706795,0.00013346576,0.0038181571,0.0018477713,0.0425312,0.0093138805,0.7854778,0.1537309,0.0000831595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018919791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029610968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0175942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015210203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076244744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058858395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297439865","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2005.tb02194.x","title":"Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Commission; Butcher; Government (linguistics); Biography; Political science; Balance (ability); Dissent; Toll; Law; Management; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06663271940801403,"score_gpt":0.33926621713222466,"score_spread":0.27263349772421064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297439865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028687256,0.15621307,0.00056888454,0.005170151,0.018131327,0.000053190117,0.0015789025,0.0005572387,0.81744033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016874309,0.06075573,0.00075373764,0.0032615464,0.0031729545,0.00005901748,0.0014003443,0.00035409405,0.92855513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991223,0.00007056004,0.000050065828,0.00016406515,0.00053478056,0.00005826016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998801,0.00023057435,0.00007403327,0.00013806671,0.0005760229,0.0001802066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004402935,0.0013811983,0.0011697392,0.0038301812,0.001320315,0.0053911987,0.0012195482,0.0014763387,0.4089127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022601204,0.0006070278,0.0005567468,0.006431938,0.0009893634,0.0028082137,0.001745055,0.0021942838,0.43200868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000929692,0.000012662164,0.000034678797,0.00027809647,0.000002656172,0.000025399535,0.000037953017,0.00004835921,0.000099606936,0.0025939061,0.91125876,0.08559866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013138042,0.000002185444,0.00006412626,0.00014573129,9.726488e-7,0.000026926104,0.000018257186,0.0000064303767,0.000012547801,0.0003067979,0.99941266,0.0000020114214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007875481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015283452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4089127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022466178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029774336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8431143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298311304","doi":"","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 225 RE-EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE: THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF CROWN-POLICE ALIGNMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Independence (probability theory); Crown (dentistry); Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.46387740870988653,"score_gpt":0.6213644238508419,"score_spread":0.15748701514095537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298311304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012143587,0.0049242442,0.001611836,0.049773376,0.0015185962,0.000039129813,0.0003018573,0.00024302171,0.9294444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17472899,0.003766715,0.0020952334,0.011901104,0.0009531352,0.000036270467,0.00023580079,0.00018533738,0.8060974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980501,0.0004469001,0.00009785872,0.00025412557,0.00073667034,0.00041423287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982774,0.0003501682,0.00012844859,0.00022675951,0.0006359203,0.00038129702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020470512,0.00026013856,0.00020537178,0.0008099805,0.006776061,0.011407806,0.0006912651,0.004613698,0.069886304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051233014,0.00035259486,0.00029912512,0.0009203372,0.0051336167,0.0031373594,0.0031040967,0.0027291884,0.0105765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002586642,0.00003326671,0.0040781396,0.0000937672,0.000010996101,0.00049768976,0.0031809523,0.00016216746,0.0005112195,0.3546442,0.5463987,0.09036305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071139384,0.000015179441,0.008328661,0.00020113666,0.000008594815,0.0001628351,0.0028077634,0.00024780584,0.00030566397,0.019024417,0.9688674,0.000023535706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23602797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48062757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23602797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007575592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00965023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46930826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301376184","doi":"","title":"Power and wound: A study of the intersection of privilege and disadvantage in &lt;italic&gt;Symes&lt;/italic&gt; v. &lt;italic&gt;Canada&lt;/italic&gt;.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.007694148817736251,"score_gpt":0.21606177887173528,"score_spread":0.20836763005399903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301376184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64553505,0.010302386,0.0033522027,0.06046704,0.00046576955,0.00007597111,0.000049154314,0.000013119354,0.27973932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894338,0.0020019396,0.00023456942,0.0025381842,0.00009554336,0.000058909725,0.000012967298,0.000017337292,0.005606753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98666453,0.008466098,0.00021975172,0.0007001668,0.0015587807,0.002390632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927878,0.005105055,0.00070274447,0.00019947394,0.00041174397,0.00079324795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007625842,0.0004589188,0.0009925304,0.0048235995,0.045382775,0.019181982,0.0029129735,0.00560479,0.0057868515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014348908,0.00059772434,0.00060250453,0.004911305,0.08482983,0.025788888,0.02297423,0.011341246,0.00036197342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010012994,0.00004077289,0.0015661598,0.00003515232,0.0000033654612,0.00041497208,0.7580964,0.000021848542,0.000048593818,0.23367104,0.0015280375,0.0045636785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004825025,0.000020270265,0.0024605305,0.00024192875,0.000004610165,0.000278983,0.9158479,0.00006631567,0.0000666896,0.035801366,0.045191858,0.000014745146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054332357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06178014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013219413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007964033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10803217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302095910","doi":"10.22215/cpopp.v1i0.2734","title":"Confronting Caligula: Toward an Effective Ethical Infrastructure for Local Governments in Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Perspectives on Public Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Environmental planning; Critical infrastructure; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.059354006868062595,"score_gpt":0.37049255061901804,"score_spread":0.31113854375095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302095910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099392205,0.0032246208,0.0027319593,0.7899648,0.0005693178,0.00023812521,0.00013239276,0.000067999266,0.103678554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8375115,0.002189468,0.0037618042,0.07480446,0.000157386,0.00013999324,0.00006413245,0.000060394075,0.08131087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906438,0.0026641614,0.00023032846,0.0005400432,0.0023982816,0.0035234625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981443,0.0066612842,0.0011242804,0.0004730234,0.00495251,0.005345998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009171112,0.00021274286,0.00025412612,0.0007200965,0.042645313,0.011694845,0.0025564644,0.010905907,0.0068017314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025519697,0.0004197497,0.00032016396,0.0010339967,0.016708016,0.0038692513,0.0075236447,0.008903175,0.0003781131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008912976,0.000082340564,0.025622673,0.00034541695,0.000040219278,0.0028979636,0.14836082,0.0012410103,0.0012575383,0.46395448,0.30838475,0.047723617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004562417,0.000046690708,0.030433109,0.000655487,0.000039558225,0.00026687686,0.18999569,0.0011652336,0.0007695431,0.053258225,0.723211,0.00011300924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99361044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12591283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12591283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33380085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9135658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302571571","doi":"10.3138/9781442609556-005","title":"1 The Evolution of Human Rights Protection in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.0365873133703862,"score_gpt":0.2778207153715336,"score_spread":0.24123340200114737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302571571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024053216,0.01733741,0.002098863,0.03202178,0.00054644974,0.000059166076,0.0009554122,0.00008445731,0.9228432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4705987,0.013431825,0.002905683,0.005618609,0.00015407709,0.000037408503,0.0003637773,0.00016787245,0.506722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815136,0.00022774204,0.000030329515,0.00019775289,0.0007065556,0.0006862034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850625,0.00028746895,0.000052000196,0.00006398818,0.0008527885,0.00023746029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085396756,0.00043319626,0.00041314517,0.0025544285,0.014993811,0.008700339,0.001339861,0.0029907464,0.025094686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038557977,0.00044791427,0.00036771223,0.0060128677,0.008237208,0.0019681426,0.0016147876,0.003298634,0.0010200551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001573764,0.00001190331,0.001509559,0.00004955354,0.0000073922033,0.00015262255,0.004014736,0.0005919061,0.00009954532,0.9029197,0.0580134,0.03261387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011026163,0.000011759428,0.00791421,0.00032036658,0.000016381842,0.0001240841,0.0036005292,0.00086208223,0.00026955735,0.08208965,0.90472466,0.00005572687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99523467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99793065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14617082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14617082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18893687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310248845","doi":"10.1177/13657127221139506","title":"The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.16063495164697966,"score_gpt":0.401471797130705,"score_spread":0.24083684548372536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310248845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4694578,0.09778178,0.0020477944,0.067235224,0.001021457,0.00004526496,0.00037342808,0.00009574516,0.36194152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639595,0.027979843,0.0004914964,0.0029146483,0.0003566267,0.000012713147,0.00009164208,0.000018202476,0.0041753454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725133,0.00051562383,0.00019676452,0.0003139003,0.0012119809,0.0005103411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934307,0.0032638274,0.0013581577,0.00035644032,0.0013371275,0.0002538343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020257093,0.00015179157,0.00022291887,0.0038030634,0.0049866517,0.009658647,0.0011684535,0.0016048134,0.0029911688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00663655,0.0003418468,0.0002817223,0.0041417177,0.012551478,0.002854747,0.0025764583,0.0034448595,0.0003153019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635648,0.000057457837,0.017577522,0.001234192,0.000030217687,0.0019689652,0.047036767,0.0005511861,0.0022726825,0.7865444,0.0074921637,0.1351482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016394262,0.00016660114,0.12230148,0.0037168744,0.0001584535,0.0062846285,0.09361873,0.0005437039,0.0027698106,0.06809045,0.7020914,0.00024143493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027482256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0344031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027482256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008756233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009177051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06353122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311063081","doi":"10.29173/wclawr74","title":"Remanding Justice for the Innocent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plea; Innocence; Criminal justice; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Economic Justice; Law; Value (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10825764446537754,"score_gpt":0.3963334976963441,"score_spread":0.2880758532309665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311063081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051809847,0.35047606,0.0039328295,0.11046639,0.003377177,0.0002753874,0.00020831965,0.000066910965,0.4793871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6830972,0.17038399,0.0020255784,0.039780688,0.0017162286,0.000091832175,0.00017095196,0.00004743395,0.10268617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99140126,0.0016952092,0.0003075108,0.00051285996,0.0042141774,0.0018689745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910512,0.0039705415,0.0009260518,0.00035180637,0.0028260958,0.0008743722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077160946,0.00023565965,0.00060591515,0.0029441619,0.0042581945,0.0046320213,0.0016948534,0.0036450448,0.0031087939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021909477,0.00022480356,0.0003295527,0.0012057825,0.006994681,0.0017303176,0.0020724484,0.0038138437,0.0006705668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029704752,0.00010173514,0.008542381,0.0014924599,0.00006764405,0.00183192,0.0065892544,0.0007252968,0.00093625387,0.5724432,0.14756238,0.2596778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027715983,0.000102607795,0.02958782,0.0042406493,0.000079293546,0.0010761388,0.006228332,0.00039349686,0.00084027287,0.05929273,0.89807004,0.00006096554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40530613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.683749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40530613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010992925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040511817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80589396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311063134","doi":"10.29173/wclawr77","title":"Conviction Integrity: The Canadian Miscarriages of Justice Commission","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Innocence; Economic Justice; Appeal; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Conviction; Criminal justice; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.08386865433143473,"score_gpt":0.3660994438326292,"score_spread":0.2822307895011945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311063134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003574913,0.099803336,0.0013445839,0.79299456,0.008940684,0.00050165434,0.0006937016,0.000078510675,0.092068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23036292,0.19294417,0.017224712,0.44293085,0.006234993,0.0009160683,0.002274982,0.00031880144,0.1067925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88741934,0.020185465,0.0062875077,0.0038305228,0.07322286,0.0090542445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68602884,0.06806813,0.010761947,0.0075103184,0.2011047,0.026526092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09779878,0.0006379426,0.0012935343,0.0112431245,0.016991267,0.0187427,0.0062166597,0.008752199,0.0046422426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23399238,0.0010667427,0.001198041,0.008991078,0.008745268,0.004933182,0.0059550954,0.012489081,0.0007182502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004473379,0.000036639085,0.0036712924,0.0012565606,0.00008265293,0.0003078409,0.003860754,0.00019212489,0.00013399975,0.1098995,0.7864905,0.09402338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003053718,0.00003392905,0.008657999,0.0038814822,0.00012774659,0.00014161608,0.0028831935,0.00018899377,0.00020725236,0.0055621243,0.9781642,0.00012088498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98644596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13027887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13027887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.59277475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9452438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312286105","doi":"10.17223/2312461x/35/4","title":"A judicial identity: the Canadian Metis before the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03600102426211883,"score_gpt":0.3197562625729193,"score_spread":0.28375523831080046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312286105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2123106,0.0048542684,0.0010299586,0.12501654,0.00093606574,0.00008488655,0.00048787383,0.000038172544,0.65524167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928833,0.0012218899,0.0005743718,0.006103824,0.000110176035,0.000021372985,0.00008653031,0.000051475086,0.09894714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424547,0.00068262516,0.000082766426,0.00072367484,0.0016728026,0.0025927115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957984,0.0005838143,0.0002343401,0.00016270515,0.0019513868,0.0012694164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026412786,0.00034617144,0.00055588223,0.0028084489,0.05753496,0.018176032,0.0019064087,0.0050439686,0.013751825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01049529,0.00046391334,0.0003645152,0.004970988,0.02047433,0.004344316,0.004229123,0.008122262,0.00074959325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006158738,0.000022992397,0.003926295,0.000031168845,0.000009123521,0.00045452872,0.054132637,0.000115845854,0.00019216117,0.8757784,0.04153272,0.023742512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004419424,0.000035968438,0.038731936,0.00038963917,0.000050022692,0.00027488486,0.13715483,0.00057933363,0.0005362935,0.060663708,0.7613656,0.00017360992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99060947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99683255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12876607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12876607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22990648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93426764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312410912","doi":"10.7202/1093269ar","title":"De la fiducie de données en droit civil québécois : étude exploratoire pour un outil en construction","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028089620729622483,"score_gpt":0.2831094994036393,"score_spread":0.25501987867401676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312410912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49220023,0.024508968,0.15462726,0.07404419,0.0005591983,0.0010616978,0.0033882353,0.00050234253,0.2491079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9176111,0.0052049523,0.043747056,0.0014180447,0.000058625254,0.00035655792,0.000837596,0.00013313016,0.030632835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96840537,0.012769521,0.0013628722,0.0026921625,0.013010344,0.001759706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9137418,0.04525138,0.0057954527,0.009187091,0.024228005,0.0017962139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037221313,0.00082086906,0.0010146328,0.0068842303,0.009957644,0.018680759,0.0038481697,0.0032716542,0.007003557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08529821,0.000941251,0.0011329995,0.009956337,0.015540643,0.0122272605,0.006841493,0.0047093267,0.0007212472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021083462,0.00010956994,0.04203048,0.0014504639,0.00018761973,0.0012444672,0.12940563,0.0046869437,0.0021219198,0.61743474,0.013461743,0.18765551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063507374,0.00023663613,0.10062046,0.005821093,0.0003041022,0.0022205256,0.16531508,0.035270292,0.0068731033,0.0857552,0.5969723,0.0005476688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87619483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8533863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92049015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07950987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08200233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5768872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313353907","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-19373-6_3","title":"PRC Impacts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Democracy; Charge (physics); Law; Political science; Psychology; History; Physics; Psychoanalysis; Politics","score_opus":0.07409426855794043,"score_gpt":0.34111886048506923,"score_spread":0.2670245919271288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313353907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003428201,0.0001733544,0.00018343782,0.0010267511,0.00016947858,0.0000190145,0.00020473143,0.000070426046,0.99781007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013635924,0.0006323092,0.00032263086,0.0017231917,0.0002350144,0.00004392253,0.00042657068,0.00018022633,0.98280025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657995,0.00032397202,0.00006227919,0.00035549246,0.0023006832,0.00037765256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864846,0.0001933336,0.00006257528,0.0003204986,0.0005799734,0.00019511174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014916842,0.0007522624,0.00044065772,0.0024761942,0.002976303,0.008646209,0.0014248088,0.0021389816,0.40324184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047273887,0.00042453237,0.0007803005,0.001780649,0.0017039614,0.0035069627,0.0039781868,0.0027802798,0.14239599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004435027,0.00006092553,0.0008132349,0.00014357982,0.000013671785,0.0001226708,0.0004319927,0.00024360404,0.0005330007,0.47220263,0.4048164,0.12057393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024217359,0.0000062797676,0.00048091586,0.0000293142,0.0000036615206,0.00003796319,0.00011870712,0.0000390309,0.00018094375,0.0061971406,0.9929,0.0000036685672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035794847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049958535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050586374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060517024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8512031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313426299","doi":"10.1017/s0962728600005856","title":"Canadian code of practice for the care and handling of beef cattle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Welfare","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code of practice; Animal welfare; Code (set theory); Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Engineering; Programming language; Biology; Ecology; Engineering management","score_opus":0.024454810898905954,"score_gpt":0.3256563238841294,"score_spread":0.30120151298522346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313426299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014726404,0.026902907,0.030013556,0.10781476,0.010429629,0.0058952216,0.072898135,0.0024725688,0.7288468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13153641,0.05973061,0.15555933,0.056431666,0.0013054649,0.0046399073,0.044930734,0.0015813324,0.5442845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98437274,0.0019498292,0.0012626619,0.0007923211,0.010004747,0.0016177469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92893744,0.0045347475,0.002387034,0.0031929421,0.055630483,0.0053173467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012011401,0.00092931016,0.00076813373,0.005298994,0.004822933,0.0027129129,0.004979694,0.0041363225,0.03779771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029376406,0.0010456757,0.0011250114,0.0063017663,0.0025936856,0.0010741788,0.0011762035,0.0037614773,0.0074459165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010759343,0.00008125026,0.0042868177,0.0008842531,0.000034911092,0.00017155892,0.0010255639,0.00038872185,0.0013173675,0.013128869,0.89194536,0.08662776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025257194,0.000050284474,0.032506667,0.0012877989,0.0000336573,0.00017911066,0.00059543154,0.00022107558,0.00036066733,0.0009754972,0.9636715,0.00009314328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9574008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97872317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0425992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03433636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17794093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24912888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313451812","doi":"10.31468/dwr.1009","title":"Commissariat aux plaintes du CIUSSS : la simplification par la communication verbale","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.1260361892928179,"score_gpt":0.4259376307065015,"score_spread":0.2999014414136836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313451812","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23718615,0.007332279,0.39405763,0.048891895,0.0043758983,0.0005567778,0.00087451085,0.0037153212,0.3030096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519046,0.0019893297,0.08712184,0.0013672287,0.0015419995,0.00043469403,0.00048709888,0.0013929881,0.05376026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94659525,0.036307648,0.002168987,0.0032092298,0.010563819,0.0011551173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9123901,0.06432111,0.004439816,0.0072590234,0.010740247,0.00084967766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014564506,0.0018684062,0.0014146012,0.0031965054,0.0067831185,0.021055017,0.0024827064,0.0048565804,0.010785127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09921615,0.0012805028,0.0016033493,0.0024670158,0.013110243,0.010677718,0.00549521,0.012994375,0.0036417264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006764676,0.0002431278,0.002952275,0.00097299216,0.00016281924,0.0023001574,0.12890421,0.0032919934,0.02108626,0.61568743,0.014922445,0.2087998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003154398,0.0004030814,0.011340077,0.0023479317,0.00026044453,0.004685608,0.08504638,0.029741824,0.053061225,0.13279225,0.6795406,0.0004651422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024882762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011255122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024882762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071479715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076945582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077025354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316925998","doi":"","title":"Le contrôle à travers le droit : une lecture franco-canadienne: codirigé avec M. H. Prince (Professeur, Université de Montréal (Canada)), Thémis, Montréal (Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0065877675640903365,"score_gpt":0.18971507319634504,"score_spread":0.1831273056322547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316925998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007489694,0.48971635,0.0431689,0.26054183,0.03771636,0.00007358659,0.0005507885,0.00030515285,0.16043727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1952834,0.4315712,0.018048452,0.013064313,0.03273336,0.00013766592,0.00041326488,0.00051075174,0.30823758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557495,0.0011270845,0.00017569729,0.00087695045,0.001625566,0.0006197647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355984,0.0032738603,0.00014912039,0.00038673796,0.0020162128,0.0006141826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007680285,0.0015879543,0.0012292337,0.0018361291,0.0033116261,0.006428712,0.0011501625,0.004605867,0.016519677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008670492,0.00084042875,0.0012630906,0.002038111,0.0067195804,0.004656427,0.0020217493,0.008252867,0.0040127947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001403795,0.00014307344,0.00088121224,0.0005971955,0.000104355124,0.00040207323,0.0025532895,0.0051360247,0.001648599,0.25081122,0.4490057,0.288577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021450305,0.000051284456,0.001645617,0.0006245581,0.000021658265,0.00028671575,0.0006367971,0.0020207113,0.0010401097,0.028599318,0.9649727,0.00007899722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18395472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111033045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8160453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020600414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010186014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36576796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816809","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.14627","title":"Wrongly Imprisoned, Released as a Pauper: Canada’s Ineffective Approach to Innocence Compensation and Avenues for Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Compensation (psychology); Statutory law; Status quo; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Payment; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.06828437774955226,"score_gpt":0.37404854191733944,"score_spread":0.3057641641677872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048267517,0.016305711,0.0039677955,0.813262,0.0009422326,0.00012183847,0.0001621225,0.000083845036,0.11688694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229419,0.017141081,0.0054139853,0.12344132,0.0004687308,0.00008851993,0.00012930119,0.00007763959,0.03029755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836956,0.0029493673,0.00044717477,0.001124941,0.006061479,0.0057214415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944826,0.0056464355,0.0008532277,0.0007750434,0.008867199,0.004409787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125861345,0.0005258346,0.00062901893,0.0039010397,0.029330708,0.017504897,0.0053710574,0.007554166,0.003565559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022076065,0.00044927734,0.00058493833,0.004798616,0.026005564,0.0047253924,0.005083757,0.013385178,0.00032600472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030639636,0.00008256922,0.0067418395,0.00029860376,0.00003270181,0.000603561,0.015416529,0.0012918623,0.0003399207,0.8203082,0.084682375,0.070171244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106289895,0.000117779826,0.039937098,0.0029420934,0.00022584642,0.0005677099,0.09082036,0.005864545,0.0012100303,0.18009509,0.67768997,0.00042320046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99092776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99617755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22872864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22872864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4253701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89456546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319780493","doi":"10.17118/11143/19039","title":"Le postulat d’inévitabilité de la notion d’atteinte initiale à la base de l’arrêt Montréal (Ville) c. Dorval de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.004107731597982737,"score_gpt":0.19636284545824592,"score_spread":0.19225511386026317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319780493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034790978,0.01886647,0.005735026,0.19787192,0.0026739645,0.000054054934,0.0002950102,0.00009783167,0.7396148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6130959,0.0070034564,0.002071296,0.0140386745,0.00068383216,0.000047121415,0.000130862,0.00018592998,0.36274305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637836,0.0008093486,0.000048681028,0.0005955115,0.0010025724,0.0011654658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962424,0.0005172354,0.00019260937,0.00020184345,0.0017237646,0.0011220848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002334575,0.00055341626,0.0004246534,0.0010860763,0.017880699,0.013286978,0.0021146627,0.003998225,0.015160879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004236127,0.00041149138,0.00035249002,0.0010954968,0.030049415,0.003737678,0.003618512,0.0069887624,0.001236177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016948177,0.000009172497,0.00095466204,0.000027246164,0.000005413461,0.000116440424,0.010080654,0.00010549604,0.0001466928,0.9454415,0.036671277,0.0064245295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001145511,0.000018607938,0.004753059,0.00025100625,0.0000135438895,0.00014237835,0.0134528335,0.00024153058,0.000334089,0.048592024,0.932128,0.00006137425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.937285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9571798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08072126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08072126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06799208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58567643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320028286","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.24","title":"La gouvernance plurinormative des manifestants : reconfigurations pénales, exceptionnalité et dégradation des droits pendant le G20 à Toronto","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.029347618391616724,"score_gpt":0.2842478285658607,"score_spread":0.254900210174244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320028286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946357,0.0007741044,0.00051784125,0.002422416,0.000042736916,0.000044695567,0.00034782148,0.000018244664,0.04947514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809498,0.0003364349,0.00013365988,0.00008736853,0.0000076019633,0.00001314346,0.000068538684,0.0000065467184,0.018396808],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991222,0.00013038192,0.000027833237,0.000097280295,0.00023970571,0.00038246895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974208,0.00035788855,0.0006971666,0.0001563907,0.0005703419,0.00079743855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008722745,0.00023830961,0.00016863491,0.00096450624,0.006129322,0.0041457694,0.00071311236,0.00055339676,0.0066214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026840575,0.00019502538,0.00014878527,0.0014246209,0.0069282176,0.0009635942,0.0030794335,0.0011680785,0.00030446638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017955231,0.000081022394,0.26156807,0.00030359952,0.0000461908,0.002382372,0.53343403,0.0011264867,0.0049590217,0.12466915,0.011655736,0.059594728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072257117,0.00007733571,0.68416536,0.00016878694,0.000026989608,0.00022126465,0.21226272,0.0002653448,0.001099217,0.0010911628,0.10056442,0.000050171257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9143178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9673449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08568221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050068505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035734218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36327416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321613926","doi":"10.3138/9781487546052-017","title":"Appendix 1 Previous Titles in the Canadian State Trials Series","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); State (computer science); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; History; Algorithm; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.07501526251061343,"score_gpt":0.28174967665276224,"score_spread":0.20673441414214883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321613926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030191563,0.0030328615,0.0012145006,0.006640647,0.006661753,0.0014063532,0.22903302,0.0008427656,0.75086606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022143216,0.002795631,0.0012626647,0.0015101592,0.0010116333,0.000553369,0.041367557,0.00051653036,0.9487682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957846,0.0003128002,0.0002523195,0.00025536361,0.002851047,0.00054374285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96955365,0.0044758203,0.0006614079,0.0013979042,0.021855121,0.0020560909],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040369886,0.001407748,0.0015391998,0.012741499,0.0049706907,0.0053453925,0.0035652032,0.002494368,0.6408196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026616639,0.001241931,0.0008677056,0.021216298,0.001165546,0.0020998907,0.0012945905,0.0022011644,0.24779458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004247785,0.0000032977641,0.000024319772,0.000047654554,5.775182e-7,0.000002865754,0.000009727756,0.000024837022,0.0000049019854,0.0014558746,0.9947866,0.0036350403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001403273,0.0000041477074,0.0010474818,0.00010373631,0.0000036997226,0.000009390335,0.000033721797,0.0000507661,0.0000337409,0.0009452647,0.99774337,0.000010539921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93880975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6408196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04456376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09491879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5123272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321613957","doi":"10.3138/9781487546052","title":"Canadian State Trials, Volume V","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); State (computer science); Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.05577626392587905,"score_gpt":0.2716416219011151,"score_spread":0.2158653579752361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321613957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090058934,0.014364591,0.00043554287,0.009965555,0.0056843814,0.00016878259,0.0030436271,0.00021236241,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009311327,0.005767527,0.00036465956,0.004303654,0.0006588148,0.000095870295,0.0011788171,0.000119879136,0.9781994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967263,0.00015738442,0.00007782005,0.00026812003,0.002202035,0.0005683403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968188,0.00046536827,0.00008284053,0.00021558115,0.001963121,0.0004543141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001761904,0.0007815071,0.00051162863,0.004462197,0.011324074,0.010142057,0.0020253458,0.0031047906,0.08931185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00703536,0.00069168385,0.00053557655,0.0073685762,0.0035430354,0.0023403997,0.0016506857,0.0030461012,0.015534544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061274345,0.0000056076788,0.000097102864,0.000057175574,0.0000013926957,0.000020760537,0.00020240387,0.0000833035,0.00004407724,0.04649785,0.93705875,0.01592543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002244597,0.0000020926414,0.0004151264,0.00004992679,0.000001574213,0.000009585596,0.00013289011,0.000027874918,0.000034310287,0.0016364503,0.99768174,0.0000061859632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95130324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08931185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06150172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11645953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44622827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321786296","doi":"10.5463/thesis.194","title":"Outlaw biker crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Law enforcement; Extant taxon; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal investigation; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal behavior; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07288184301749688,"score_gpt":0.4168009147166292,"score_spread":0.34391907169913233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321786296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5230951,0.0041343654,0.00193869,0.009722809,0.00035952442,0.00016736804,0.00040165609,0.00007426331,0.46010628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8721767,0.0036016456,0.0015000496,0.0023077333,0.000070884664,0.00008696847,0.00030601447,0.00006735443,0.11988253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759895,0.0008119665,0.00012175578,0.0003469507,0.0006457363,0.00047455262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779344,0.0004660483,0.00051255303,0.0003173328,0.00049826514,0.00041234543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001617992,0.00030985216,0.0004984934,0.002337023,0.0084376605,0.0058795633,0.00072320946,0.0013899343,0.023092855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065258835,0.000280262,0.00026444704,0.0025322493,0.0026301462,0.0039709024,0.005043684,0.0023797986,0.0034656113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015585743,0.0005783658,0.083863564,0.0008559616,0.000088006804,0.0017806073,0.2031789,0.0003761636,0.0008506808,0.32952586,0.08530056,0.29344553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001362239,0.00019409016,0.12364835,0.0016535444,0.000064988475,0.0015872375,0.3247686,0.00050290395,0.0011665724,0.043221995,0.50312066,0.000057386434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011733824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047786646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023092855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024931678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037214167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07725334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322390777","doi":"10.5040/9781509940790","title":"Landmark Cases in Privacy Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.108116627465776,"score_gpt":0.33657457990416406,"score_spread":0.22845795243838807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322390777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043941615,0.025807677,0.0039005536,0.12707008,0.0075412807,0.000055738492,0.00019934849,0.00019242999,0.83083874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19948637,0.017271794,0.0030206433,0.0635697,0.0050087087,0.00018038685,0.00023930112,0.00017189635,0.7110513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768305,0.0009043402,0.0000430729,0.00015106022,0.0008209522,0.0003974896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768865,0.0016416818,0.00009081865,0.00017165655,0.00027035357,0.00013680813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001670095,0.00030472773,0.0002017632,0.0011044787,0.0037625993,0.0050881677,0.0010059448,0.0049002017,0.0109817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008540139,0.00027003983,0.00046333394,0.0014810051,0.006469902,0.003509792,0.0024208678,0.005190439,0.0026461228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064029405,0.0000059448444,0.00006248115,0.000027154956,0.0000015577839,0.00017812352,0.0010318573,0.000089837136,0.00005125976,0.58183616,0.4038595,0.012849721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060470256,0.0000072746125,0.00024868068,0.00013951346,0.0000034184045,0.0001777378,0.0008974757,0.00008244368,0.00010995263,0.073132694,0.9251854,0.0000093005465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023968019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04161597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023968019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004606976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004013803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047657013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323660945","doi":"10.33137/ic.v15i.40365","title":"Taking Rights Frankly: Justice Iacobucci and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.029295445264535976,"score_gpt":0.29371127566500366,"score_spread":0.2644158304004677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323660945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008415391,0.016842827,0.00094164023,0.81836,0.0031669764,0.00005469824,0.00036859763,0.00004088497,0.151809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51020765,0.018806994,0.004569604,0.28640243,0.0047765113,0.00021507742,0.00033868224,0.00036353222,0.17431948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812759,0.0037969297,0.00048104624,0.0019716178,0.0068086823,0.0056659128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823413,0.0065664453,0.00058956124,0.000865122,0.007122458,0.002515051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014891141,0.0010173968,0.0014538316,0.0040469435,0.040866166,0.02447597,0.004742471,0.022233196,0.009189854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039229933,0.0010966831,0.00079468376,0.0053777816,0.04729378,0.009030499,0.006369459,0.030907424,0.0008671147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026588315,0.000015057668,0.00041572322,0.000048383277,0.000011680938,0.00007113095,0.005967556,0.00013670635,0.000056683497,0.7578079,0.22802165,0.007420892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051984942,0.000011244933,0.004041865,0.00065845356,0.000054874377,0.00006241162,0.01251548,0.00034760614,0.00023284309,0.19238389,0.78942287,0.00021639663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13485773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13485773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26674214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360994723","doi":"10.22329/tclr.v1i2.7931","title":"Admissibility of Hearsay Gathered Under MLAT: A Tempest in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; State (computer science); Tempest; Political science; Admissible evidence; Work (physics); Resistance (ecology); Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08576572488900898,"score_gpt":0.36449516725802383,"score_spread":0.27872944236901487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360994723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6272751,0.043575335,0.0022138243,0.11977967,0.0010068261,0.00038286872,0.0019844847,0.00007763368,0.20370428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571475,0.011292303,0.0016631117,0.010720063,0.0000987796,0.000035199693,0.00036091215,0.000039426865,0.01864274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98722327,0.0017655293,0.000724529,0.0010315654,0.006271316,0.0029838933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94349325,0.01837307,0.0014619867,0.0013184435,0.0321096,0.0032435763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016572308,0.00025298263,0.0008373106,0.0034450644,0.017961465,0.009066931,0.0034378048,0.003280249,0.0028521218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047320314,0.00056072016,0.00046661648,0.0071729994,0.007888304,0.0020798352,0.003673551,0.0049220854,0.00024603924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007997307,0.0002483031,0.11422163,0.0023324918,0.00043529065,0.010040036,0.1508664,0.0026899877,0.0023420318,0.2568214,0.12838262,0.3308201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015107889,0.00029345838,0.24152203,0.004253645,0.00091615494,0.002077188,0.20478573,0.0032304504,0.004028545,0.01754253,0.52064544,0.00055366225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99652195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99901414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10799996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10799996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26813036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7835982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393004","doi":"10.7202/1098445ar","title":"Vers une théorie de la fin de non-recevoir en droit privé québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015576148114654527,"score_gpt":0.29426636034274894,"score_spread":0.2786902122280944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11433566,0.008651171,0.009179614,0.112507395,0.00030977,0.000048837297,0.0005374381,0.000036597125,0.75439346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89071333,0.0021140722,0.0011495202,0.0061006583,0.00010618778,0.00004214608,0.00012786234,0.00005555229,0.09959077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979367,0.00046550977,0.000038965354,0.00034326455,0.0003925206,0.00082297705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652773,0.0015402002,0.00026084794,0.00031502877,0.00091075525,0.00044531847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037257718,0.0004691341,0.0006460404,0.0012044092,0.009323335,0.0053458232,0.0018714382,0.005646884,0.022554211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008487153,0.0005438314,0.00073636963,0.0015656219,0.01784481,0.007423561,0.0032277927,0.0074253324,0.00090797397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015135199,0.0000130610515,0.0011133049,0.000018840587,0.00000988454,0.00011438062,0.0041497825,0.00036222287,0.000038307524,0.98459077,0.0067110597,0.0028632162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057504567,0.000030996365,0.010020418,0.00058022054,0.00008553199,0.00020057384,0.011045,0.0022107377,0.0002671561,0.8412392,0.13420185,0.000060830138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84387755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8581635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15612245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03733829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025712268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31408376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393007","doi":"10.7202/1098443ar","title":"Rééquilibrer le rôle de la Cour suprême du Canada en procédure criminelle","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014494343375557108,"score_gpt":0.26251071006144366,"score_spread":0.24801636668588656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07938446,0.089972995,0.006255498,0.29949114,0.0039296923,0.00018619606,0.00071261305,0.00010895058,0.51995844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8004276,0.029025806,0.0036926193,0.04766939,0.0013376506,0.000096896714,0.00025075662,0.00014082264,0.11735842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823357,0.0021901312,0.0002474053,0.0009130739,0.0048930524,0.0035226634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856871,0.0059335725,0.0006900284,0.0004493373,0.0058232364,0.0014168094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094445795,0.00034612935,0.0004832393,0.0014122698,0.008437389,0.009139475,0.002104993,0.005266907,0.01350938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02962973,0.00033784154,0.00053478155,0.0019633577,0.010103574,0.0049156947,0.002784311,0.006720913,0.0010064638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012497511,0.00004414419,0.008033068,0.0003817956,0.00004803433,0.00032844482,0.01097843,0.0005698055,0.00061731413,0.75708926,0.11282944,0.1089553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666539,0.000099867415,0.037621614,0.0020819579,0.00015779673,0.0003525728,0.011895787,0.0010098874,0.002048448,0.04835452,0.8961336,0.0001772959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96514577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07245362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057953104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1267831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42048115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393784","doi":"10.7202/1098239ar","title":"L’« égalité des armes » — une expression bénie ? — en droit processuel au Québec : le rôle du droit international","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025749966424812688,"score_gpt":0.28760895523232355,"score_spread":0.26185898880751085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14488052,0.008629284,0.005401384,0.104805544,0.0006398707,0.000059671915,0.00037871746,0.00007253604,0.73513246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83344096,0.0030415154,0.0011597972,0.0070644454,0.00007957588,0.000036207417,0.00010095989,0.00006923569,0.15500727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689865,0.00078340305,0.000057963316,0.0003788783,0.000893076,0.0009879691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997399,0.0006381493,0.00018765847,0.00014822882,0.0011496287,0.00047736045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022663581,0.0003864316,0.00026426584,0.0010081889,0.013433671,0.010792704,0.0014073458,0.0021750613,0.01225107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041168323,0.00027440052,0.0003345416,0.0017967339,0.014433851,0.0028513519,0.0028486485,0.005364797,0.00062082335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004426719,0.000025792668,0.007212351,0.00012513845,0.000020902346,0.00031673105,0.08480624,0.000465797,0.0005226613,0.83909744,0.041028406,0.026334358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014223237,0.00003514763,0.033237353,0.00064208667,0.00004914249,0.0001234885,0.07076978,0.0008135486,0.0007495483,0.020030329,0.87343204,0.00010343169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97682285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07770677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07770677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07127496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56380475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366323396","doi":"10.59259/jd.v2i1.27","title":"THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JURNAL DARUSSALAM Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Judgement; Law; Political science; Section (typography); High Court; Admissible evidence; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.029615592900656264,"score_gpt":0.3119752309448825,"score_spread":0.28235963804422626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366323396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5574267,0.016180763,0.02838119,0.049617738,0.0014535851,0.0009963555,0.00073503895,0.000089287605,0.3451193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886099,0.0014415627,0.00457545,0.0014669141,0.0003758225,0.00012140176,0.0001292855,0.000008011286,0.0032717157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8237355,0.07231338,0.022849124,0.010975834,0.06289996,0.0072262906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63806486,0.26005873,0.037995107,0.026296422,0.03146994,0.0061148633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.105348065,0.000498929,0.001345445,0.009550076,0.007074499,0.011177182,0.005027445,0.0081855515,0.0027246885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43908387,0.0011647686,0.0012178024,0.004296219,0.020466777,0.010774256,0.009172218,0.009797989,0.0008194263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068105356,0.0004952642,0.09705765,0.0013803908,0.0004167833,0.0036447358,0.0134878,0.0020431227,0.001468708,0.71621567,0.0054765204,0.15763223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002293074,0.0015910305,0.15596017,0.0063747703,0.000948971,0.011271331,0.012929522,0.0070807114,0.008673843,0.7325382,0.0619805,0.0004215379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052872594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008756518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105348065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048407214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009639618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55714047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366958521","doi":"10.5040/9781509954308.ch-008","title":"Tolofson v Jensen: Reframing the Canadian Common Law Choice of Law Rule for Torts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11636264669063008,"score_gpt":0.3326545332950051,"score_spread":0.21629188660437504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366958521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008627028,0.01713049,0.005779374,0.25029215,0.0032307468,0.00016340407,0.00079096557,0.00010912904,0.7138767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42206642,0.011864395,0.010014716,0.13362272,0.0016123981,0.00021604344,0.0004014581,0.00033642648,0.41986537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98869145,0.0015529611,0.00038286252,0.00086448574,0.005549696,0.0029585478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99237293,0.0036169332,0.00017129617,0.0002977781,0.0028449437,0.00069608557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008728745,0.000861693,0.00083516986,0.0051218164,0.017408563,0.013379681,0.005810165,0.025515145,0.011377879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024184866,0.0011560478,0.00080372277,0.0055600316,0.020894296,0.0065428843,0.0031485583,0.016123943,0.0012324366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074177374,0.0000062903287,0.00014432904,0.000021402328,0.0000036315057,0.000096893586,0.002756569,0.000122558,0.00004909345,0.8532088,0.13686869,0.006714235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025578574,0.000008426894,0.0021727642,0.00043580844,0.000031747917,0.00021294235,0.004565178,0.00052819774,0.0002477668,0.24466255,0.7469566,0.00015241602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087399796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087399796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17343536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63413286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377225642","doi":"10.1515/9780773571006-003","title":"Introduction: A “Canadian” Bill of Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02222922805592522,"score_gpt":0.22725877265814884,"score_spread":0.2050295446022236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377225642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007040499,0.0067892615,0.0012741593,0.059662517,0.0066689453,0.000084688385,0.001169,0.00010868418,0.9235387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026139142,0.005884059,0.0025071327,0.047656026,0.0024620814,0.00014254877,0.0005972249,0.0002185874,0.91439325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977927,0.00020727867,0.000045841825,0.00023998103,0.0012035123,0.00051069167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985629,0.00024741545,0.000030395713,0.000077235534,0.00089337374,0.00018878284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013466253,0.0008649597,0.0004754034,0.0024991874,0.009335428,0.0074883555,0.0016732106,0.0063589322,0.07744346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003993103,0.000492571,0.00060874334,0.002871164,0.004228862,0.0027197928,0.0013729779,0.007687684,0.010942889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060585007,0.000006324091,0.00005725419,0.00003359851,0.0000011134657,0.000028093364,0.00024803585,0.00005704773,0.00004312842,0.31881562,0.6695878,0.011115985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023121881,0.0000017052647,0.00023265478,0.000063466425,0.0000015102996,0.000022608512,0.00009904052,0.00002953747,0.00002526324,0.013359387,0.9861537,0.000008916137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8421487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.910469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15785128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035495285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039819866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31756175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239256","doi":"10.1515/9780773571006-013","title":"Arthur Roebuck’s Canadian Bill of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 3 November 1949","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027087363338053796,"score_gpt":0.23915214177056027,"score_spread":0.21206477843250648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020769457,0.0300234,0.00097252574,0.13090779,0.009326677,0.00020545766,0.0009117882,0.00008692883,0.82548857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024834944,0.0058461777,0.0007678648,0.0517501,0.0008868296,0.00012303318,0.0001141302,0.000070752685,0.9156062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496645,0.00065232284,0.00015901455,0.0004977263,0.0022345074,0.0014899202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816906,0.0004282476,0.0000545588,0.00012354407,0.0009686933,0.00025578405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034949689,0.0011287959,0.0007089481,0.0027138342,0.017265199,0.0092826355,0.0017073838,0.016590338,0.018485073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009052782,0.00096852897,0.0007801928,0.0021645175,0.011387609,0.003877831,0.0027205737,0.015065593,0.0037389174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001742145,0.000017916107,0.00011575868,0.000040518138,0.0000058753417,0.0000786748,0.001255306,0.000083818006,0.00005644835,0.42710477,0.56053215,0.010691433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009247068,0.0000037320472,0.00044112245,0.00011924689,0.000005336711,0.000022154803,0.00028952202,0.000026036862,0.000073233634,0.019452821,0.97953355,0.000024052619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91187066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9724717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08812934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054929517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07925141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39854342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378385726","doi":"10.1515/9780228002222-003","title":"Finding the Content and Meaning of the Canadian Rule of Law in Its History","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Content (measure theory); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08339818394133315,"score_gpt":0.2359077457332274,"score_spread":0.15250956179189423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378385726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017277554,0.027097417,0.0016503655,0.080198914,0.0015264965,0.000058955968,0.0007704845,0.000052163152,0.8713678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65643513,0.025541047,0.003064736,0.013672463,0.0005990667,0.00006199699,0.0003924355,0.00024692126,0.29998636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565434,0.0006067474,0.0000876469,0.00043119903,0.0020226005,0.0011975336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994114,0.001854152,0.000174705,0.00025215407,0.0030766898,0.0005283451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037886435,0.00056247396,0.00047486942,0.0067514717,0.021646677,0.017379224,0.0019577956,0.0046033827,0.012323836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015016025,0.0006717242,0.00035863268,0.011247509,0.034393836,0.006718915,0.0024661452,0.006241117,0.00087481143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014233065,0.0000066675952,0.00071607437,0.000078836194,0.0000065495174,0.000105246574,0.021015778,0.00014876043,0.000085873864,0.8724101,0.075623155,0.029788705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054782386,0.00000620629,0.0056693284,0.0005415794,0.000016300855,0.00007317265,0.015390659,0.0002104098,0.00016779956,0.08136165,0.8965012,0.00005632977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99694806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17986083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17986083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24264263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9512452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379017104","doi":"10.54648/gplr2023007","title":"Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Privacy Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Legislature; Data collection; Control (management); Internet privacy; Law; Business; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.045397490870108595,"score_gpt":0.3535570972028212,"score_spread":0.3081596063327126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379017104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05056635,0.25371653,0.0040848036,0.10681148,0.0012923963,0.00026658183,0.00096315896,0.00008672441,0.582212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6860944,0.21662053,0.005540726,0.035915796,0.00048079516,0.00015229637,0.00060715294,0.000089266556,0.0544991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855004,0.0015935175,0.0005683433,0.0010953522,0.0092354575,0.0020069156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342955,0.0047039213,0.0010432205,0.0006400575,0.009313325,0.0008698803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009171556,0.00044979455,0.0006485444,0.008020776,0.016145607,0.012308239,0.002305077,0.0034787017,0.004086463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019627247,0.00067937624,0.00065232796,0.014375651,0.019067071,0.004154253,0.003879994,0.0047679897,0.00028971082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002409754,0.000031731917,0.004699196,0.00080801686,0.00003456214,0.00037719027,0.01077331,0.00063497043,0.00022844998,0.8540226,0.045095786,0.08327003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021666774,0.000030133711,0.022849143,0.0035723208,0.00009877807,0.00026729458,0.007165338,0.00056445214,0.00043765045,0.04356006,0.9213068,0.00012638886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18095315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18095315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3324104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94997823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379409582","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4453473","title":"Le recours aux clauses de dérogation aux droits et libertés dans un contexte fédéral: l'exemple canadien (The Use of Notwithstanding Clauses in a Federal Context: the Canadian Example)","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Derecho; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.08274255147069075,"score_gpt":0.3243533674080883,"score_spread":0.24161081593739753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379409582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047368553,0.0041395114,0.0060663815,0.030416751,0.0005198066,0.00011821037,0.0004660349,0.00007787512,0.91082686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74567604,0.0034364038,0.0060200896,0.010716792,0.0002745121,0.0001614289,0.00018936882,0.00019562688,0.23332968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924077,0.0017376654,0.00012803759,0.0007345003,0.0023032797,0.0026888591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976501,0.0010873831,0.00013850111,0.00019943819,0.00072154787,0.00020296042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039427206,0.0007690709,0.000664214,0.002114707,0.027162667,0.0107072005,0.0028163574,0.008947569,0.009552652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073394454,0.000611342,0.0007624479,0.0047189873,0.023712212,0.0050167087,0.003929796,0.008909619,0.0008022781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012640393,0.00000803926,0.00040113606,0.000022413442,0.000004859087,0.00025777143,0.020633776,0.00009813982,0.00017035329,0.9605587,0.013843062,0.003989103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050673818,0.000018218929,0.004988061,0.00029244067,0.00006585229,0.00055211905,0.041818406,0.0006550226,0.0009570607,0.09215055,0.85831916,0.00013242076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98678535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06785253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06785253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060833495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49230683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536754","doi":"10.17118/11143/20327","title":"Un rendez-vous manqué avec l’accès à la justice : le projet d’un tribunal unifié de la famille au Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015548908626709905,"score_gpt":0.24639392816977437,"score_spread":0.23084501954306447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50579137,0.006400994,0.0029512397,0.40253398,0.001797173,0.0007100383,0.00046732323,0.00006344533,0.079284616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89997494,0.0026951344,0.003618429,0.024505246,0.0002004431,0.00048111848,0.00016887615,0.000045074263,0.068310745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924132,0.0024814233,0.00019599564,0.00042079843,0.0015033191,0.0029851927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863928,0.0017626197,0.00051900407,0.00048533612,0.0042213486,0.006618785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009607391,0.00047124422,0.00041350705,0.0010042298,0.016690094,0.008744086,0.002262302,0.0060151224,0.009130769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022740906,0.0004731008,0.00039074427,0.0011186219,0.0065948055,0.003408314,0.0063731833,0.0057165436,0.0004423184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005626434,0.0017547472,0.14652053,0.0007758125,0.00021738444,0.0034129077,0.15831375,0.0025907133,0.004252679,0.19569987,0.18976225,0.29613668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003500548,0.00083696475,0.31286395,0.0017078427,0.0002835076,0.0006291256,0.28346962,0.0028215211,0.001937422,0.012642422,0.38223892,0.0002186961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9607613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98413265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05113594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05113594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21541488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37101895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380268003","doi":"10.1515/9780773576766-011","title":"Developments in Ontario Minimum Standards Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03373032279070482,"score_gpt":0.25691350326301327,"score_spread":0.22318318047230845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380268003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020333374,0.011184982,0.0020951114,0.12835263,0.0019714595,0.00021820317,0.002142996,0.0002634687,0.8334378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09037027,0.0073133428,0.0055445945,0.017755266,0.0004066094,0.00017094954,0.00074865017,0.00017113858,0.8775192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988027,0.0010715345,0.0005162917,0.00067628996,0.0068789483,0.0028299643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883555,0.002106803,0.0006074502,0.0004720808,0.0066728024,0.0017853223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065939873,0.0004975923,0.0005090653,0.0045603067,0.01300059,0.008319256,0.0030626042,0.0055227317,0.024359252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014686215,0.0013019001,0.0010272689,0.006590699,0.0040213875,0.002750171,0.0022824393,0.004158745,0.0021365017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076763485,0.000055468492,0.0032345434,0.0004046288,0.000021234622,0.00033503617,0.0071854237,0.0008465735,0.00057960616,0.4548801,0.4740235,0.05835714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012996336,0.000016191425,0.008720146,0.00018598017,0.000011765568,0.000033687305,0.0009366706,0.00022318578,0.00014130097,0.0044616386,0.98522156,0.000034840916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22161038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22161038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.313316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9028216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381051785","doi":"10.23977/jaip.2023.060406","title":"The significance and scope of application of the principle of legality in criminal law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Scope (computer science); Law; China; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Socialist market economy; Limiting; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10252876638725533,"score_gpt":0.43744207577878397,"score_spread":0.33491330939152864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381051785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08583797,0.028273622,0.103980094,0.10096311,0.0019986308,0.00036698917,0.00014848207,0.000105148676,0.678326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96347046,0.0061830864,0.016319007,0.0062495307,0.0015886795,0.0002608161,0.000049950726,0.00003253364,0.005845867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97807777,0.0105969235,0.0017620556,0.0025693001,0.0055545783,0.0014394054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96850944,0.020777589,0.0022328373,0.0026598037,0.005037313,0.000783004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018930264,0.00033459967,0.0009305838,0.0039045692,0.005723375,0.0070703803,0.0019841073,0.0052232966,0.0020367643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0316059,0.00045679093,0.0010507266,0.0024420086,0.04608992,0.010171174,0.0061016553,0.0071911598,0.00032100384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060207135,0.000014496898,0.0009240257,0.0000721315,0.0000068452705,0.00010852039,0.0009867249,0.00023943151,0.00012025992,0.98793787,0.00064280967,0.0089408895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015796288,0.000046143818,0.003043537,0.0002925198,0.000019107605,0.0003271558,0.001002373,0.00090231985,0.00026677726,0.9620365,0.03201409,0.000033687786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045847455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029548868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018930264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042033633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010636266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10011405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381380466","doi":"10.4324/9781003193982","title":"Leading Works in Criminal Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10227840475323487,"score_gpt":0.37280849064948207,"score_spread":0.2705300858962472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381380466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017554031,0.018428644,0.0006630279,0.006005021,0.0016103945,0.000022060678,0.000026546837,0.0000549268,0.97143406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058917005,0.036024228,0.0017747931,0.005295129,0.0014834207,0.00007019899,0.00010570052,0.00021239498,0.8961172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837613,0.00043388718,0.00003371915,0.00012181426,0.00074739713,0.00028700253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987268,0.0005849601,0.00007161359,0.0001060848,0.00027134587,0.00023912826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094004686,0.000521261,0.00030328264,0.0027853427,0.011469776,0.011301018,0.00072039367,0.0014708212,0.018074032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023996583,0.00022872684,0.00031362512,0.0046621477,0.0083068255,0.0048440946,0.00355219,0.0030238444,0.007065816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007961725,0.000030697334,0.0003176176,0.000121457684,0.0000022562801,0.00015968921,0.015033142,0.00007611044,0.00006258614,0.65170604,0.24367063,0.088811845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.161651e-7,0.000004132567,0.00015357153,0.0002739568,0.0000010101439,0.00007462796,0.0024078514,0.000023105287,0.000033654305,0.0185676,0.97845674,0.0000027810038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006541025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0192448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018074032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052192146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048928084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060463667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381380802","doi":"10.4324/9781003193982-3","title":"James Fitzjames Stephen, Digest of Criminal Law (1877)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08924013903648657,"score_gpt":0.3319581100529624,"score_spread":0.2427179710164758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381380802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024503856,0.28720254,0.0013564767,0.04555644,0.005696171,0.000049585633,0.00033167252,0.000055835444,0.657301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037854984,0.10537704,0.0015709881,0.016833393,0.0013861528,0.00007946698,0.00022374913,0.00009655459,0.8365778],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994318,0.00015257893,0.000021472788,0.00006765614,0.00026381484,0.00006272406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968445,0.00014928429,0.000023700919,0.000014780483,0.00008843183,0.000039398616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000655626,0.00049414375,0.00021244875,0.0015789451,0.002766638,0.0031815986,0.0003014567,0.0018168584,0.013263325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014540794,0.0003666495,0.00013768981,0.0017159659,0.0034657184,0.003104873,0.0010335462,0.0027771946,0.004652881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011000728,0.000012058281,0.00022042303,0.00011806082,0.000002704321,0.00008527754,0.0032616376,0.00006025151,0.00009999951,0.26105124,0.68896604,0.046111256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012573717,0.0000024647293,0.0002706666,0.00015371182,6.1384384e-7,0.000057111167,0.00027288546,0.00001014378,0.000026851172,0.009969812,0.98923117,0.000003293291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03520117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09911524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03520117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045286724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037755694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06999254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381416100","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4473871","title":"State Action in Action: The Charter’s Application in Criminal Investigations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Charter; Political science; State (computer science); Law; State action; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.07501291459564785,"score_gpt":0.374794153197,"score_spread":0.29978123860135214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381416100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062643886,0.005559182,0.55782586,0.12286327,0.007227164,0.0009896114,0.0010522669,0.0020096402,0.23982912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74904096,0.0019489101,0.21597573,0.00831079,0.0022618547,0.0009825595,0.00025447586,0.00036716132,0.02085764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98143643,0.014110313,0.0005124628,0.001445434,0.0018867581,0.00060852896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169266,0.07370198,0.0021880087,0.0027149022,0.0036073718,0.00086122035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026504084,0.000711687,0.0015005313,0.0024180608,0.0051197247,0.0074464665,0.0017506384,0.008462595,0.010628005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09205489,0.00055219803,0.0017735434,0.003219554,0.009804747,0.008805147,0.0036733656,0.0070501193,0.0011162965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017555483,0.00010006744,0.0037763584,0.000113620205,0.000043488853,0.00017235675,0.001512138,0.00655454,0.00008224779,0.84341305,0.039556123,0.10450062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022437898,0.00035093536,0.006508287,0.00053773867,0.00020633044,0.00024899477,0.0021521861,0.09619446,0.00073885365,0.8240466,0.06857149,0.00021976836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031782083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031358592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043284264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009687346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14016867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381798365","doi":"10.4324/9781003176619-37","title":"Indigenous sentencing courts and Gladue reports","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.05688875300863551,"score_gpt":0.30920546919309816,"score_spread":0.25231671618446266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381798365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16026661,0.01724007,0.00073276437,0.009008567,0.0005626455,0.00008915624,0.00015345111,0.000045239485,0.8119016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799612,0.012650618,0.00088120316,0.002107856,0.00019494035,0.00007770945,0.00012268404,0.000032906417,0.18432003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526805,0.0012349202,0.0001223723,0.00021408868,0.0022120196,0.0009485801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946312,0.0029346137,0.0005059368,0.0002001516,0.0014345931,0.00029350683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020477653,0.0001630643,0.00019135483,0.0032260076,0.006378231,0.0053694705,0.0013331472,0.0010809782,0.0068084896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011589581,0.00022954194,0.0002609536,0.0025200802,0.004862879,0.0024568478,0.003678182,0.00269929,0.0004059927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038577604,0.00008401874,0.005008708,0.00032031268,0.000015883877,0.0017970057,0.09761991,0.0004167184,0.0004276817,0.793372,0.024689563,0.07620976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011939878,0.00009398574,0.06276694,0.0014974086,0.00004203318,0.0012870173,0.08115742,0.000515033,0.0009788264,0.018891603,0.8326661,0.00009164918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20616798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3642433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.793832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013722223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090035815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40993595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382394176","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.15667","title":"The Conflation of the Justification Framework for Infringement of Aboriginal Rights with the Oakes Test in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Conflation; Indigenous; Test (biology); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04871593263422157,"score_gpt":0.3712439027538741,"score_spread":0.3225279701196525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382394176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13433142,0.0039944854,0.026026502,0.15703611,0.0019372685,0.00027121702,0.0003220748,0.00012807,0.6759528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93997186,0.00084818725,0.006662239,0.023003882,0.0003019509,0.00015186895,0.000070297436,0.000041705498,0.028948033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97056615,0.0075094895,0.0012671272,0.0020307135,0.014789043,0.0038373892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765545,0.012664107,0.0014275205,0.001372951,0.0067592515,0.0012217616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014551215,0.0003259929,0.00094096403,0.0025246523,0.010929702,0.013093582,0.0028824196,0.007836902,0.0023000971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036881268,0.00055721606,0.00054338935,0.0020959228,0.03448648,0.0042282855,0.0042943796,0.01385343,0.00026556203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015802423,0.000009635096,0.00064788054,0.000026849415,0.000006620021,0.00025759556,0.0023410886,0.00017826162,0.00013414663,0.98595494,0.0053107073,0.0051164227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015322193,0.00010070077,0.013142351,0.0007919935,0.000102750186,0.0006344504,0.010416562,0.004838477,0.002217904,0.7399211,0.22725773,0.0004228189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71458775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78173417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28541225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043292604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06086482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5741862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382653418","doi":"10.29173/wclawr83","title":"Barred: Why the Innocent Can't Get out of Prison","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Misconduct; Prison; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08177313844520986,"score_gpt":0.366859515541614,"score_spread":0.28508637709640416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382653418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016346386,0.46537688,0.0006052314,0.5073654,0.0077534895,0.000022934375,0.000060945764,0.000028114287,0.017152399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04626845,0.24665698,0.00088655937,0.6801343,0.005181746,0.00010266968,0.000098901946,0.0000625915,0.020607749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836716,0.007875625,0.0012212598,0.0015259169,0.0042873886,0.0014181832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97415507,0.016666915,0.0015915083,0.0007235888,0.0052034985,0.0016593856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018007403,0.00044237933,0.001258456,0.0025808036,0.0045795296,0.00797478,0.0027666537,0.014150764,0.005057202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05068709,0.00060598244,0.00082315,0.001218578,0.01550538,0.009179354,0.0034941053,0.0172063,0.002006397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009278416,0.000056757428,0.0014909321,0.0031766535,0.00008940411,0.0008932954,0.004294392,0.00008658058,0.0003641037,0.23984465,0.56499624,0.18461415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005284704,0.00009200318,0.00223421,0.009965112,0.00007166568,0.0006223909,0.0029383237,0.00004562665,0.0002500102,0.03379822,0.94986725,0.000062375235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042533953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07026772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042533953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063172732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013000254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09523338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382683095","doi":"10.1515/9780773560260-008","title":"Les interdictions du district judiciaire de Montréal","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.041272583940564544,"score_gpt":0.25790880788237075,"score_spread":0.2166362239418062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382683095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29401895,0.059086878,0.0046766056,0.034535754,0.0018156373,0.0003869431,0.005646392,0.00033396846,0.5994988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6164623,0.0069537004,0.0016203517,0.0014714941,0.00028700585,0.00012036948,0.0005902021,0.00006454063,0.37243018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971934,0.00041349165,0.000067140325,0.00032689722,0.0009229133,0.0010761505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998965,0.00033046817,0.00012287851,0.00005853645,0.00025393462,0.00026919294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010860515,0.0008011219,0.0006964729,0.0022253946,0.010821684,0.0044384026,0.0020509923,0.0020596872,0.022108443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041483706,0.0009908765,0.0006470029,0.0025202767,0.0027181515,0.00096447684,0.0018692083,0.0033554316,0.00075725577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003945416,0.00017514233,0.030927204,0.00040010057,0.0002869129,0.0022155326,0.0071113696,0.00820752,0.0018969494,0.5547679,0.20486742,0.18874949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017014313,0.00017428097,0.17142221,0.00042057512,0.00014591623,0.00075576524,0.0045538982,0.00390542,0.0015833689,0.014798961,0.8018842,0.00018527838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97192085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049868524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049868524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045797504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36182314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382865325","doi":"10.1515/9780773556188-005","title":"Part-time Montreal Law Practice and Part-time Law School Lecturing of the 1950s and 1960s","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016605561410025366,"score_gpt":0.2264723565137187,"score_spread":0.20986679510369333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382865325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08014592,0.0367519,0.0010148654,0.028229354,0.0028260492,0.000111855166,0.0016865473,0.00022552608,0.84900796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19159994,0.006617031,0.00050683005,0.0013638565,0.00023212672,0.000041795458,0.00019918458,0.00007306532,0.7993662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832195,0.00027258144,0.000031893313,0.00025685292,0.00052661647,0.0005900688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967135,0.0004648811,0.000232358,0.00013391231,0.0007609947,0.0016942761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014665751,0.00049664744,0.00039076604,0.0035612362,0.011560798,0.0064321966,0.0016106946,0.0018964407,0.07006365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057317982,0.00055474264,0.00019737218,0.00550425,0.006276115,0.0025741665,0.0033007197,0.0021618137,0.003375393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010436834,0.00011002099,0.0069854413,0.00028230422,0.000011223917,0.00038282372,0.04303273,0.00039084398,0.0006999872,0.38099703,0.33833456,0.22866869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067750007,0.000029540892,0.036599565,0.00026137373,0.0000035196408,0.00005649499,0.0058455286,0.00013955707,0.00023327411,0.0026385984,0.9541669,0.000018920944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82410115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95063007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17589885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058454577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05112332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4241196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384152451","doi":"10.1515/9780773556102-014","title":"L'avènement de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés : le pouvoir remis aux citoyens, un tournant plus fondamental que prévu","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02301969338907565,"score_gpt":0.24825418473251556,"score_spread":0.22523449134343992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384152451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038296082,0.018784672,0.0013831947,0.037645403,0.003761742,0.0000736469,0.00021118441,0.00006383713,0.93424666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088607624,0.009266237,0.0017015161,0.0052088266,0.0006031455,0.00010207694,0.00015043841,0.00009073008,0.89426935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675494,0.000699758,0.0000837797,0.0003204824,0.001462236,0.00067877315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983076,0.00054862676,0.00010145469,0.0001551269,0.00047182906,0.0004152761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026036445,0.0004300257,0.00038413313,0.0015270611,0.009104155,0.01078558,0.0011651064,0.004425772,0.026850076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051493635,0.00044895755,0.00049609336,0.0022749095,0.008181612,0.0032314507,0.0037485887,0.009763653,0.004522952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018569379,0.000014988688,0.00040245443,0.0000823205,0.000004208019,0.00014504977,0.0066089695,0.00016108736,0.00013733363,0.73380464,0.21993373,0.0386867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003995936,0.0000132376,0.0010293544,0.00019461694,0.0000024525684,0.000070564885,0.0015744704,0.00004454918,0.00010727197,0.014490634,0.982453,0.000015781474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21806546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4087175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78193456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119071985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02616089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43359232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384168566","doi":"10.1515/9780773568075-009","title":"The Exchequer Court of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exchequer; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02061050302600599,"score_gpt":0.22540030184178483,"score_spread":0.20478979881577886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384168566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01344605,0.015058918,0.0005071515,0.08647814,0.002053659,0.000088251414,0.0006696673,0.000067900975,0.88163024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.115689665,0.003589812,0.00039142766,0.018664116,0.00029120367,0.00007001824,0.00013266614,0.00008952523,0.86108154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947008,0.00036964836,0.000098999524,0.00050988904,0.0022126455,0.0021080226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646676,0.00083930866,0.00008224304,0.0001902157,0.0017002104,0.00072128064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002178335,0.0007330962,0.0009994741,0.0018561523,0.032101553,0.015506165,0.0028118826,0.014349017,0.039465528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010653828,0.0013083902,0.0005875802,0.0029227105,0.0063208123,0.0040474124,0.003123748,0.013746199,0.0028054737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034659464,0.000027431832,0.0007747901,0.000040266,0.000014820608,0.00026214696,0.0016661359,0.00027026847,0.0000765601,0.6136953,0.36757,0.015567622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027017237,0.000013354874,0.0025682375,0.0002356529,0.000032299275,0.00009163324,0.002489939,0.00045971872,0.00016057018,0.041585367,0.9522539,0.00008246682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99486214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09255782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09255782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18935551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6715571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384705183","doi":"10.7202/1099313ar","title":"Les acteur.trices de la justice : les légistes","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06302302038413941,"score_gpt":0.40531307011260154,"score_spread":0.3422900497284621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384705183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015932947,0.02017057,0.006890397,0.219498,0.008901092,0.00012428153,0.0006794986,0.00017624273,0.72762704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31737968,0.013004791,0.0035229442,0.036996316,0.0038835797,0.00027401885,0.0004355789,0.00026920185,0.6242339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959996,0.0017735427,0.0001707931,0.0003820837,0.0011751774,0.0004988539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967045,0.001444969,0.0002295591,0.0002030068,0.0011502545,0.00026773577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023617102,0.0007077702,0.0004112092,0.0016806633,0.010401621,0.010214515,0.0012630912,0.0045952355,0.019221153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073783905,0.00027085564,0.00045318724,0.0015971602,0.010047222,0.003955567,0.0027756603,0.007107757,0.0034638944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024652498,0.000016212744,0.00071798585,0.0002675201,0.000009328717,0.00030272093,0.033456266,0.00016153949,0.0003986752,0.6822216,0.25235507,0.03006854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020205277,0.000007729875,0.0014271109,0.00023284386,0.0000034281718,0.00011998366,0.0057315705,0.0001205744,0.00023404851,0.010268944,0.9818387,0.000013124319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17384773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2796226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17384773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01775871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01305745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34567165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385207589","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3812","title":"The Principle of Proportionality in Sentencing: A Dynamic Evolution and Multiplication of Conceptions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Desert (philosophy); Epistemology; Punishment (psychology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Conceptual framework; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028988565804703607,"score_gpt":0.3441027141883296,"score_spread":0.315114148383626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385207589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1088915,0.007891995,0.46075505,0.031092955,0.00079358404,0.00022095536,0.00009851812,0.00026324065,0.38999215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961287,0.0012505898,0.029249057,0.0008425633,0.00018261914,0.00011292676,0.000021732076,0.00008272739,0.006970678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97435385,0.01353604,0.00090178405,0.0025245363,0.0073665413,0.0013171895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98273575,0.010756355,0.0011805053,0.0024343466,0.0022661625,0.00062685757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020660456,0.00054075225,0.000910073,0.0037331798,0.005961614,0.012222223,0.0025212467,0.0035125895,0.0030629376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038320996,0.0007135556,0.00067053933,0.0022143882,0.076178424,0.018469727,0.008594241,0.007009359,0.0003343962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005236458,0.0000035715536,0.000106446605,0.000016081429,0.0000025818013,0.000020868987,0.0034183844,0.00017655805,0.000055597324,0.99165815,0.0001374511,0.004399069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007696425,0.000025130941,0.0005605857,0.000102259786,0.000009002497,0.00011901958,0.0016412348,0.00079916714,0.000195376,0.9771304,0.019380813,0.000029254894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010684661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007834844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020660456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010323255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008712327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109264255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385207603","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3814","title":"Animal Rights Activism and the Constitution: Are Ag-Gag Laws Justifiable Limits?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Government of Canada","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University","keywords":"Legislation; Private property; Public property; Business; Constitution; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law; Permission; Agriculture; Numerus clausus; Law and economics; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.038774735410318485,"score_gpt":0.29621756662216997,"score_spread":0.25744283121185146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385207603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031897426,0.007951258,0.005638453,0.5240527,0.00082914357,0.000073684394,0.0002325648,0.000050301176,0.42927444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8090591,0.0049526636,0.0033822905,0.13755646,0.00094221503,0.00020168812,0.00013736606,0.00005572302,0.043712463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889938,0.0025337667,0.00033210582,0.0011524219,0.0034573695,0.0035305414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772142,0.01578333,0.0015433311,0.0011868278,0.0030707088,0.0012015646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016298419,0.0004832259,0.0008721772,0.0015501825,0.012402401,0.014263116,0.0033761116,0.020042993,0.009237519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03430094,0.0005815529,0.0006764863,0.0015877245,0.0550523,0.011540724,0.004272535,0.019472938,0.0009806084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008082433,0.0000111672425,0.00047287135,0.000019099773,0.0000048999864,0.00007543373,0.0013161121,0.00005483552,0.000035679463,0.98835075,0.007194436,0.002456564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058469952,0.00002234982,0.0031579407,0.0008882517,0.00004535,0.00013637495,0.008186786,0.0004968803,0.0003461964,0.76132184,0.22527535,0.00006428352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48169762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5541458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48169762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024418455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046661448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95778763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385310803","doi":"10.59962/9780774867689","title":"Constitutionalizing Criminal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04041631574321696,"score_gpt":0.2430482774225144,"score_spread":0.20263196167929742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385310803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023517928,0.013059399,0.009378886,0.018616294,0.0008671645,0.000098777724,0.00013609217,0.00008045919,0.95541114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.508732,0.050480947,0.023424735,0.032247018,0.0033652284,0.0007137599,0.0009597209,0.0002522368,0.3798244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518234,0.0012418637,0.00015088766,0.0005340583,0.0022470888,0.0006437529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978168,0.0011640475,0.00010029589,0.0003822482,0.00039208715,0.00014454912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003963375,0.0005723671,0.00058319425,0.001996331,0.0060886475,0.011015986,0.0016693042,0.0039065634,0.0071372585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084478995,0.00048427124,0.0004609138,0.0017483932,0.034901265,0.005986632,0.004352915,0.008140703,0.0012864113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.885536e-7,0.0000023264574,0.000021281641,0.0000137462275,6.4848695e-7,0.000011223292,0.0002006915,0.000102080594,0.00003062952,0.9921034,0.0037473717,0.003766136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005423024,0.000006343871,0.00019632767,0.00019465384,0.000004565995,0.000037440357,0.00038006646,0.00015264851,0.00015090867,0.709274,0.28958803,0.000009599709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08159249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084371306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08159249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021644061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02698966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16223514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312886","doi":"10.59962/9780774867771-009","title":"The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03343787351661778,"score_gpt":0.2336122260564085,"score_spread":0.2001743525397907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004974083,0.0203908,0.00019919798,0.045213226,0.002987604,0.00006973208,0.0007891709,0.000070097325,0.92530614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018709099,0.0027212081,0.00017496532,0.0058207973,0.000120968376,0.00003777209,0.00012348949,0.00004420425,0.97224754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830306,0.00017763572,0.000049072318,0.00014498565,0.00068470446,0.00064062676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985135,0.00032842753,0.000038639195,0.00010656015,0.00067301217,0.00033981111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00117001,0.0005643731,0.00058419287,0.0021257934,0.014609875,0.012099103,0.0015067402,0.0075121312,0.05083463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004025983,0.0008962277,0.0003823076,0.003023449,0.0035634334,0.0018958045,0.0021395087,0.0079924585,0.006198131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021515803,0.00002112099,0.00046103192,0.00006147336,0.0000064283013,0.00016911197,0.00089155487,0.0001290414,0.00010187747,0.07503694,0.8871163,0.035983477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005176835,0.0000031052823,0.0020476775,0.00016285831,0.00000656803,0.000026906126,0.0010131067,0.00008260895,0.00008020683,0.003825669,0.9927287,0.000017366534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.949546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05083463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04693141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08260741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3405128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312904","doi":"10.59962/9780774867771-011","title":"Menzies v. Vancouver Police Department","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Police department; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.037218595455080536,"score_gpt":0.23550276878388393,"score_spread":0.19828417332880338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002141816,0.0066246334,0.00011983459,0.00804454,0.0008071109,0.000060285533,0.00045239145,0.00005049131,0.98169875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009450981,0.001288576,0.00006419359,0.0031292592,0.00005204806,0.000021829337,0.00008331832,0.000023411803,0.98588634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998801,0.00010218296,0.000022744636,0.00010623017,0.00053324044,0.0004344982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926656,0.00016043238,0.000024764,0.00003501939,0.00036957892,0.00014352678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006015082,0.0007470549,0.00043379932,0.0019441766,0.01745473,0.007022897,0.0014760048,0.0055931043,0.07200713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024487039,0.0011020986,0.00033147764,0.0020141974,0.0015607717,0.001248214,0.0011974599,0.0065670544,0.013041237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019972993,0.000017951546,0.0005680914,0.00005009549,0.0000045356082,0.00015821417,0.00087985455,0.0000715068,0.000088518245,0.040714048,0.9308938,0.026533289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072111357,0.000006581449,0.0021698577,0.00010899061,0.000007921553,0.000054761185,0.0008670054,0.00006558014,0.00014977223,0.001955497,0.9945938,0.000012911722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84810907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15189093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015906228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025607489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30557084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385321903","doi":"10.59962/9780774863346-006","title":"Canadian Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02967689959797474,"score_gpt":0.20728535141166682,"score_spread":0.1776084518136921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385321903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004625978,0.0031989308,0.00013720208,0.004478214,0.00076239265,0.000043816763,0.0016126268,0.000095615665,0.9892085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027995345,0.0010238084,0.00013690686,0.00082810456,0.000056418477,0.000017856506,0.0002948366,0.00003681507,0.99480563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829096,0.00009307507,0.000038739712,0.00022225022,0.0009588249,0.00039612682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863666,0.00011177565,0.00002881017,0.00010544645,0.0008983803,0.00021893065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007189401,0.0011094909,0.00061827834,0.0039058789,0.013901157,0.0093501555,0.0015981741,0.003890646,0.3028994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027895153,0.0008296082,0.0006453524,0.0042737625,0.002101557,0.0023108358,0.0018800577,0.0037548,0.05868386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008403901,0.000014450598,0.00019974423,0.000048182403,0.0000027758779,0.000044654687,0.00023513028,0.00006246789,0.00004428745,0.070372626,0.90171766,0.027249755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001908234,0.0000013081224,0.00037236043,0.000038758037,0.00000185167,0.000011778189,0.00015454309,0.000029785568,0.00002518851,0.0017213067,0.9976361,0.0000051930824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9466517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3028994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043178726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06228206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385361822","doi":"10.59962/9780774867184-018","title":"Liquor-Related Laws in Force in Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028280722712198957,"score_gpt":0.2104570404586067,"score_spread":0.18217631774640775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385361822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27162313,0.014281134,0.00034591413,0.040667232,0.0005429733,0.0002415114,0.009086673,0.00009229784,0.6631192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31141943,0.009305125,0.000425145,0.0025444438,0.00007462015,0.00008228995,0.00118568,0.000063921994,0.6748993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986191,0.00007274404,0.000055219494,0.00007046829,0.0005329953,0.0006494761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975744,0.0003690988,0.00022091663,0.00005909676,0.0009798512,0.0007965587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061557925,0.00022807135,0.00030112322,0.0024112174,0.013841397,0.0043134876,0.0012839424,0.0018887195,0.024287151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030010457,0.00086385355,0.00037109366,0.006089225,0.0018964335,0.0011938274,0.0016175683,0.0018943984,0.0012993779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023964548,0.0001584197,0.11430978,0.00073711824,0.00007024437,0.002439377,0.05400365,0.001438423,0.0010449451,0.17964819,0.5197369,0.12617332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003123793,0.000027417012,0.26977023,0.0004360512,0.000042122072,0.00015803002,0.028881125,0.00061357376,0.00031755483,0.002097908,0.6975676,0.00005715139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12517267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12517267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2104215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90819556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385362300","doi":"10.59962/9780774838207-004","title":"Canada’s Opposition to a Covenant on Human Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Opposition (politics); Human rights; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.033824714405430945,"score_gpt":0.23418697109863862,"score_spread":0.20036225669320767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385362300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012414887,0.012112478,0.00037797276,0.23736979,0.0022525177,0.0000701507,0.0006869873,0.000060137696,0.7346552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18520269,0.007097488,0.000752548,0.07867029,0.0004580901,0.00007717137,0.00021120439,0.00012217909,0.7274083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910834,0.0006583204,0.00016574899,0.00048435357,0.0045662997,0.0030417994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933936,0.0017180505,0.00013871602,0.00020679686,0.0032613582,0.0012815555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031288674,0.0006058308,0.00073435204,0.0036961667,0.026440196,0.016233966,0.0023379782,0.0142060295,0.021478843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01208266,0.001064879,0.0007716807,0.00430164,0.008666879,0.0030076127,0.0030832612,0.014981455,0.0015902785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003910204,0.000024564148,0.00083725847,0.000077582954,0.000019466228,0.0003113955,0.002759714,0.00023540518,0.00014838284,0.44806057,0.5291097,0.01837688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003221689,0.000009317319,0.003581246,0.00028169175,0.000030105375,0.000074383715,0.0025178357,0.00028449518,0.00022820188,0.017144654,0.975753,0.00006285908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13695304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13695304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32289314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385433775","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-38157-7_5","title":"The Political, Legal, and Criminal Justice Systems of the UK, the U.S., Canada, and Australia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Critical criminological perspectives","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.15567581556491683,"score_gpt":0.36885526715773853,"score_spread":0.2131794515928217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385433775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10475634,0.06916985,0.0012211413,0.075983636,0.001054631,0.00012857387,0.000931176,0.00006118133,0.7466935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8151439,0.028795075,0.0012815543,0.0041351966,0.00017978669,0.000083172126,0.00042578872,0.00006602286,0.14988962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788517,0.00046777265,0.00004041521,0.00008444221,0.0007139575,0.0008081485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998713,0.00032487637,0.00014062661,0.00002808201,0.00045593272,0.00033746765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008696218,0.00021032302,0.00024983753,0.0022383684,0.005768182,0.00642308,0.0008368762,0.0013665128,0.0050427457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034901642,0.00033314186,0.00015173946,0.0048139314,0.008531265,0.0020544296,0.0014629979,0.0018530294,0.00042724275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026327209,0.000025871874,0.006308274,0.00017903901,0.000016003569,0.00031042076,0.02858244,0.00077724434,0.00022271335,0.77420586,0.11483182,0.07451406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011360679,0.00002717893,0.11921377,0.0009938427,0.000020699843,0.00023600261,0.037124194,0.0010834081,0.000186958,0.08266098,0.75837874,0.000062769344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9231977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07680231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05318256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07325181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38586825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385470913","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-4163-3.ch004","title":"Negligence, Risk Management, and Liability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Appeal; Risk management; Supreme court; Law; Business; Liability insurance; Political science; Actuarial science; Finance","score_opus":0.05963058880957621,"score_gpt":0.32663870198497247,"score_spread":0.26700811317539624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385470913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013294393,0.06161429,0.0035732253,0.015434317,0.0013852065,0.000051775427,0.00004904763,0.00003730646,0.9165254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10779078,0.09249855,0.005181401,0.021586526,0.004335362,0.00020984912,0.00015235766,0.0000836595,0.76816136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981969,0.00038704986,0.0000668445,0.0001307705,0.0010640285,0.00015440804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883157,0.00076877594,0.00006728873,0.00006296415,0.00021572207,0.00005367668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011217111,0.0005894416,0.00033906364,0.0013702661,0.0028067345,0.0038663745,0.0006771868,0.0029293604,0.010523097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027903111,0.0003024372,0.00027306977,0.0010155332,0.009172504,0.0036002917,0.00138059,0.0033100653,0.0025262823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023977432,0.000013695527,0.000077514924,0.00007955675,0.000001764594,0.0000805954,0.0011521011,0.00022000956,0.00006161497,0.8817728,0.090281636,0.026256315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000281792,0.00001257533,0.000341142,0.00054465566,0.0000029573396,0.00016062564,0.0006249966,0.00018033516,0.000067908506,0.27975646,0.718296,0.000009572091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018557638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027082622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018557638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059384285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069034686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04308647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510037","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1426","title":"Touch of Evil: Disagreements at the Heart of the Criminal Law Power","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Parliament; Political science; Criminal law; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Politics","score_opus":0.059901766982270975,"score_gpt":0.3523978768534113,"score_spread":0.29249610987114033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014107129,0.34057552,0.0043030838,0.52954465,0.00282781,0.000024866353,0.00006642465,0.000019098541,0.10853143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5682729,0.13946068,0.003112824,0.26873648,0.0059658135,0.00010138966,0.00008586728,0.000075395925,0.014188683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95811146,0.026615333,0.0014434656,0.0025212977,0.009265916,0.0020426156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9482468,0.043754876,0.0014733509,0.0016181318,0.0041615698,0.00074534887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029846808,0.00041057976,0.0013648357,0.0033714396,0.0075234943,0.013569417,0.0022789142,0.010218517,0.0026983249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04897007,0.0004893165,0.0006072396,0.002146371,0.043863155,0.016400108,0.004996383,0.017239723,0.00063061476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041811352,0.000033410342,0.00077926094,0.0007623325,0.00006325403,0.00050921063,0.010079449,0.00014341334,0.00045145932,0.8659212,0.056343816,0.06487145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037070906,0.000058717404,0.0029701716,0.0042911936,0.000049212384,0.00041506143,0.015231437,0.0001491741,0.0005876141,0.4790395,0.497097,0.00007399464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014734745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029738484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029846808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007875324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010620566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15784687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510428","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3718","title":"Frontline Justice: The Evolution and Reform of Summary Trials in the Canadian Armed Forces by Pascal Lévesque","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Economic Justice; Military justice; Discipline; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Swift; Subject (documents); Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.053165095743292944,"score_gpt":0.34319482815194313,"score_spread":0.2900297324086502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059829094,0.06800543,0.012820394,0.55331963,0.007765478,0.0012101427,0.00094774633,0.0005088181,0.29559335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7759183,0.032806545,0.019570688,0.063647866,0.0027469378,0.00065453147,0.0004536246,0.00055406353,0.103647396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96656245,0.011393786,0.001367744,0.0028108174,0.012047592,0.00581764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91694397,0.028683545,0.002567059,0.003931496,0.04029652,0.0075773583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034184106,0.00048293077,0.0008554232,0.0036956787,0.019588396,0.015674967,0.0053735035,0.0060416264,0.008743801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14266323,0.00077058206,0.000404996,0.0047325203,0.015785191,0.0049106968,0.0044079153,0.0063933344,0.0008255513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018610978,0.00010736201,0.0046729334,0.00046345437,0.000048813967,0.00035354163,0.010303407,0.0024883505,0.00035370467,0.42334995,0.24454518,0.3131273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019666972,0.00016407002,0.030234046,0.001643455,0.00010616893,0.00019037211,0.0065437118,0.0034776465,0.0007571094,0.050121587,0.90629005,0.0002750351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9707069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12494936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12494936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2664282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9065753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1426","title":"Negotiating Trauma &amp; Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legal education; Mental health; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Law; Reflexivity; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychotherapist; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.07473822658891317,"score_gpt":0.40410784692831275,"score_spread":0.3293696203393996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12686466,0.0079640495,0.03894723,0.416782,0.0040480117,0.00030577154,0.0000755661,0.00084975315,0.40416303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86754245,0.004548561,0.011701043,0.04082537,0.0006305852,0.00037129704,0.00005125597,0.00023412608,0.0740954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98584634,0.009689797,0.00023753534,0.0006438378,0.0018815832,0.0017009585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98609805,0.0059151514,0.0016133016,0.0007605595,0.0009770333,0.0046360265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010224914,0.00044493482,0.00037646305,0.0013057746,0.015949816,0.015496604,0.0022328745,0.005190907,0.018921493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025590526,0.0005628389,0.00059815805,0.0008113435,0.024662992,0.01299999,0.013476603,0.012185331,0.005315449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003460257,0.00067434594,0.0052036936,0.00025210905,0.000022713988,0.0012838914,0.48830277,0.0003050102,0.0012096935,0.20325957,0.14500423,0.15444732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023768838,0.00009422775,0.002364667,0.0005474095,0.000011459666,0.0011306453,0.4724565,0.00054413354,0.0009409897,0.100673124,0.42115963,0.000053459287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041243564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008898934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018921493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007969474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008040927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0632987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511500","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1421","title":"The Impact of Vavilov: Reasonableness and Vulnerability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Judicial review; Political science; Immigration; Standard of review; Vulnerability (computing); Administrative law; History","score_opus":0.05779535309543207,"score_gpt":0.39809654890772705,"score_spread":0.340301195812295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16782434,0.06343264,0.012168131,0.4623512,0.0016422117,0.00016728288,0.00063008326,0.000031230164,0.29175287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96719867,0.0064130034,0.000752968,0.022025364,0.00033268813,0.000045774053,0.00005230448,0.000014928655,0.0031643717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97421426,0.011335158,0.00095701753,0.002542992,0.007711638,0.0032389227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94202584,0.045167882,0.0043367264,0.0014890442,0.005383341,0.0015971493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020021934,0.00030841216,0.0006988895,0.00453905,0.008090734,0.009555134,0.0020932814,0.004908162,0.001982934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07222116,0.00032673968,0.0008612034,0.0037387826,0.029722173,0.00796733,0.0060302457,0.00812713,0.00011627948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028391922,0.000009122153,0.0072809868,0.000115272436,0.000051127543,0.0003067094,0.0059171934,0.00028828898,0.00005002545,0.96909493,0.007918668,0.008939349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002924603,0.000060961225,0.022788757,0.0015723989,0.00029995668,0.0005144808,0.014817408,0.0009392595,0.00069452234,0.84000564,0.1181739,0.00010341964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32764295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43210152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32764295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024283398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030445594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65147173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511511","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1417","title":"Policing Arbitrariness: Fleming v. Ontario and the Ancillary Powers Doctrine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arbitrariness; Law; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Power (physics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.03635044261269767,"score_gpt":0.3190331780598511,"score_spread":0.28268273544715344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07918143,0.019789865,0.0042571826,0.113313995,0.0004885921,0.00015814257,0.00033876655,0.000034039665,0.78243804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91425854,0.0064682723,0.0020182473,0.01928903,0.00032842642,0.00007740548,0.00010586686,0.00002112855,0.057433274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941742,0.00064909144,0.0001530173,0.00068107934,0.0029552788,0.0013873945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579334,0.0018864791,0.0005098371,0.0002581989,0.001061878,0.00049031206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00514204,0.00031330268,0.00033699616,0.001629249,0.011084196,0.005059576,0.0018716343,0.0064746547,0.0036802462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014415027,0.00046303062,0.00043028974,0.001767224,0.012730508,0.0027710488,0.002363259,0.0041291807,0.00025746482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052804917,0.000014347111,0.004404743,0.00007657629,0.000014080968,0.0011452393,0.007498307,0.0002768815,0.0002825146,0.9403797,0.024293229,0.021561533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001947506,0.00006700704,0.035041198,0.00090750563,0.00010447966,0.0006937077,0.005626223,0.0014404978,0.00073210726,0.25652048,0.69847155,0.00020050578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94926035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050739646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047413338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07217553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3440094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511540","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1415","title":"Sidestepping the Charter, Again: Muting the Right to Habeas Corpus in Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Principle of legality; Political science; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Immigration; Preparedness; State of emergency; Refugee; Politics","score_opus":0.03941747296194391,"score_gpt":0.302507838068831,"score_spread":0.2630903651068871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028459193,0.014504865,0.002446221,0.799048,0.0058269007,0.000099768076,0.0005989608,0.00007202305,0.14894411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42616645,0.010058528,0.0031256846,0.4937039,0.0022303148,0.000114036906,0.00031535642,0.0001555519,0.06413018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880084,0.0023619144,0.0003765175,0.0013680797,0.004970171,0.0029148816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98593,0.0066438597,0.00044210482,0.00047633803,0.005006676,0.0015010476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015019904,0.00045348844,0.00080038107,0.0024686814,0.025277546,0.015054213,0.003940725,0.015046099,0.0038911172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032270122,0.00069909426,0.00064032676,0.0023929998,0.030398406,0.006591364,0.0043718116,0.025921738,0.0005127735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040885392,0.000017078322,0.0015516422,0.00010382871,0.000026712327,0.00055218715,0.010187153,0.00022511966,0.00035693726,0.67598414,0.2961806,0.014773603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010655948,0.00004208651,0.008109445,0.0013634736,0.0001230412,0.00024283849,0.024616744,0.00066747,0.0014909584,0.13043731,0.83252907,0.00027102866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9661084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98159397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0525311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0525311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14571303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3811416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512088","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1388","title":"Ewert v. Canada: Shining Light on Corrections and Indigenous People","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Supreme court; Alienation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Service (business); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04312486217968218,"score_gpt":0.30159071501481893,"score_spread":0.25846585283513673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03247812,0.38586438,0.00085475383,0.40670645,0.0032804024,0.00009349818,0.0009196417,0.00006085946,0.16974185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45815018,0.20479357,0.0018996551,0.28917715,0.001620096,0.0000894949,0.00030468858,0.000078370715,0.043886766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98818433,0.0018062437,0.00033694794,0.00089782506,0.0064098183,0.0023649363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818449,0.008805855,0.00075154577,0.00038790551,0.006734857,0.0014748607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008742441,0.0004538854,0.0006971758,0.0048009343,0.013473561,0.008813838,0.0026198481,0.007829445,0.0029721176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019671526,0.00039162693,0.00053648907,0.0070230067,0.017768186,0.004023353,0.0026950443,0.008062171,0.00021742251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008514994,0.00003374373,0.0051852027,0.0015715596,0.00011917745,0.0013511511,0.014952073,0.0004946285,0.0005735053,0.55141616,0.33576506,0.088452555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064675456,0.000035145527,0.019740736,0.0044901795,0.00022511263,0.0003264791,0.015915813,0.0002683552,0.0007173357,0.038491778,0.9195481,0.00017609303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99633443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07912491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07912491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23101331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5740941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512102","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1378","title":"R. v. Comeau: A Crack In the Wall?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Corporation; Law; Economic history; History; Business; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1230823411716574,"score_gpt":0.37116021248468095,"score_spread":0.24807787131302356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01745992,0.095026694,0.00075303623,0.57167345,0.0039054807,0.00007201585,0.0004962104,0.00009453459,0.3105187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23665458,0.03843103,0.00087728776,0.6033498,0.001804988,0.00009473882,0.00023478288,0.00007264327,0.11848011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959561,0.000536912,0.00012034426,0.00065714103,0.0015753232,0.0011541866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949492,0.0019381888,0.0002490628,0.00014230542,0.0019371235,0.00078411953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037126353,0.00044443566,0.00066754123,0.0017571853,0.013468682,0.0065704375,0.002468543,0.014119068,0.009497791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012369656,0.00046356834,0.0006612697,0.0016692812,0.00794184,0.003940074,0.0016627089,0.0108725745,0.0015191241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060522663,0.000022290176,0.0030455617,0.00027668194,0.000050224407,0.0023956783,0.0037543804,0.0000666157,0.00033324468,0.28201717,0.6663103,0.04166732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040965697,0.00004230992,0.0059694275,0.0011979154,0.00006684326,0.0008201739,0.004094263,0.00007860153,0.0004343029,0.015753947,0.97143483,0.00006641182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8378857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9339032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16211432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023965392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040590234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32613808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518186","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1182","title":"Appointment of Thomas A. Cromwell to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science","score_opus":0.042000117219170095,"score_gpt":0.3210072597370037,"score_spread":0.27900714251783365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037273407,0.0557817,0.002352438,0.3687955,0.01484078,0.00035477555,0.0006534594,0.00014452163,0.5198034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.343328,0.025745222,0.0020344453,0.10674396,0.0016252103,0.00007760694,0.00021248794,0.00008341221,0.5201497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675375,0.00034630546,0.00007383652,0.00033724995,0.001394451,0.0010944279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722916,0.0007014097,0.000103083294,0.00004403189,0.0014439161,0.00047843027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017295139,0.0002519709,0.00043792828,0.0017071611,0.01807133,0.004543402,0.0011261061,0.0043186247,0.0074895257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008646335,0.00040579092,0.00036610116,0.0014351693,0.0028283412,0.0010710857,0.0012225424,0.0069304225,0.0007001841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040678933,0.000042761905,0.0038930632,0.0001385618,0.000022316293,0.0015037521,0.0036584989,0.00034759764,0.000634328,0.27796796,0.67572993,0.036020525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017404109,0.000030508278,0.008840792,0.00033628324,0.00003321438,0.00026853263,0.0039937864,0.00035055174,0.00075575284,0.008126495,0.97715557,0.00009107447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9593693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0406307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039904557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08385624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2895292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518201","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1053","title":"In Harm’s Way: The Limits to Legislating Criminal Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm principle; Law; Constitutionality; Charter; Harm; Supreme court; Legislature; Criminal law; Political science; Discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.10647320265844608,"score_gpt":0.38585393060511947,"score_spread":0.2793807279466734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052070443,0.015589187,0.098969266,0.27950355,0.0018764433,0.0002053924,0.0001929621,0.00018283699,0.5514099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026671,0.003441148,0.022159075,0.052878115,0.0016152511,0.0005819838,0.000087222055,0.00010938876,0.0164606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93957096,0.029938713,0.0030788851,0.0069834227,0.016953405,0.003474586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9300107,0.0535916,0.0033569804,0.006060083,0.0056011737,0.0013794624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051020727,0.00051506166,0.0010954583,0.0023957482,0.009884923,0.018644629,0.003667822,0.015005483,0.0025509477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08449761,0.0010209759,0.001351344,0.001420897,0.06934607,0.018301876,0.008067335,0.022051403,0.0005879968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008429967,0.000013911529,0.00022615306,0.000028582059,0.000007170814,0.000027970513,0.0019117576,0.00023523734,0.000100109726,0.9894872,0.0025244493,0.0054290975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001869943,0.00003311844,0.00053521764,0.00027639116,0.000018080604,0.000054543634,0.0018378265,0.0004432808,0.00039406234,0.9397256,0.056623846,0.000039256945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151977455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016638985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051020727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006342662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013517751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2698266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599519","doi":"10.59962/9780774835558-005","title":"<i>Auton v British Columbia:</i> Reversal of Fortune","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.027280979908316946,"score_gpt":0.21889314022542827,"score_spread":0.1916121603171113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004573758,0.012420836,0.00022415818,0.046902537,0.003379801,0.00009061994,0.0012871831,0.000113240036,0.93100774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037691858,0.0040701767,0.0002594453,0.044947524,0.00036665247,0.00010365433,0.00042488912,0.00011675573,0.91201913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975752,0.00016597283,0.000080318096,0.00020862593,0.0010129585,0.00095694937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821883,0.0005252691,0.00006144699,0.000110101115,0.0008253175,0.00025907013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013492999,0.000730251,0.00062600116,0.0023844799,0.014664723,0.009425438,0.002753479,0.014597413,0.040070772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061370363,0.00092282536,0.0005323465,0.0030409286,0.0032387911,0.0027733687,0.002049378,0.012697397,0.0073083453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015214299,0.000010920194,0.00030027013,0.00006813182,0.0000057729903,0.00015579992,0.00090096594,0.000048931062,0.000118135766,0.06415101,0.92063755,0.013587285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012134845,0.0000061202227,0.0028184338,0.00044418566,0.000021658587,0.00008743932,0.0014644763,0.00008071483,0.00031486878,0.0067154937,0.9879887,0.000045824516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93830186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06169814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03484392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07029123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25281155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599526","doi":"10.59962/9780774835558-006","title":"<i>Chaoulli v Quebec:</i> The Last Line of Defence for Citizens","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.035974779376377886,"score_gpt":0.23454588028355697,"score_spread":0.19857110090717908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004666772,0.030337986,0.0005640814,0.08965004,0.0035735583,0.000090262925,0.0017660569,0.00011129329,0.86923987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043897536,0.0064383247,0.00047406656,0.03087369,0.0002919652,0.000068750815,0.00034638314,0.000115206465,0.9174942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978794,0.00020824878,0.000043909466,0.0001749246,0.00080477976,0.0008888222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987255,0.0002925473,0.00004954716,0.000070275666,0.00067867053,0.00018354833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013058578,0.00083959434,0.00053246546,0.0017325645,0.018077303,0.009845523,0.0021749744,0.010437927,0.046059843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039029485,0.0006621649,0.0006059004,0.003085522,0.0046704705,0.0033530246,0.0015902603,0.009461542,0.0043041036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012400068,0.000009151787,0.00042984122,0.00007229534,0.000006940785,0.00011789353,0.001964793,0.000061545084,0.000098471515,0.13529773,0.8484083,0.013520608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055847727,0.0000033994102,0.0014869808,0.00020415173,0.000008284024,0.00005743939,0.0016205373,0.00005811619,0.0001424907,0.004463334,0.9919226,0.000027093143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99688417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07436373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07436373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11960671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5395491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385820679","doi":"10.23939/law2022.36.182","title":"The experience of the United States оf America and Canada in the prevention of criminal offenses against the subjects of criminal proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika» Seria Uridicni nauki","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Criminal investigation; Psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine","score_opus":0.018836428935683797,"score_gpt":0.2627632403262862,"score_spread":0.24392681139060238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385820679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60555536,0.027342621,0.0012392909,0.17600922,0.0013790394,0.00016423786,0.000535814,0.00006154088,0.18771295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93388927,0.014989588,0.00082927773,0.01974896,0.000119873606,0.000033899818,0.00016749147,0.000041378244,0.030180313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903713,0.0023881206,0.000192229,0.0005812607,0.0026945646,0.0037726164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680437,0.002647616,0.00079525914,0.00026328885,0.0042722127,0.0052172947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036521156,0.0002791066,0.0004700598,0.001872577,0.025764694,0.0071958965,0.0014129155,0.0029410406,0.004932288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111731095,0.00051217224,0.00046411058,0.004224523,0.008879492,0.0020612532,0.005922473,0.007559133,0.00031798985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033476466,0.00073440303,0.18129705,0.000526092,0.00020209968,0.0065792976,0.29897982,0.00072320615,0.0014954613,0.10743768,0.12156167,0.28012842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043795688,0.00020837183,0.1391215,0.0006244759,0.0001470428,0.0022340552,0.30177048,0.00028443945,0.00085010275,0.002970077,0.5515616,0.00018399257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055939555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055939555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17905225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4058718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385861524","doi":"10.59962/9780774850346-013","title":"Selections from the Dissent in <i>Symes</i> v. <i>Canada</i> <sup>†</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Political science; Nuclear physics; Physics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025354335161872465,"score_gpt":0.21668320457346146,"score_spread":0.191328869411589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385861524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010292752,0.061453916,0.00077369536,0.14172934,0.037853636,0.00014649576,0.0013475536,0.00015158343,0.75551456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00510319,0.009341138,0.00035065747,0.03196608,0.0024586117,0.00006426624,0.00032031818,0.00012913065,0.95026666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894303,0.00010331336,0.000036758163,0.000090365465,0.00066546124,0.00016102167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862874,0.00039632188,0.000033712728,0.00004628587,0.00067083223,0.000224123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009556813,0.0011553895,0.00074582675,0.004293028,0.0098619405,0.0040839985,0.0017295057,0.0028882695,0.053934973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031368942,0.00043701706,0.0006116955,0.0035344067,0.002623353,0.00214685,0.0018589151,0.0048558,0.01810466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004042835,0.0000021377145,0.000013480102,0.000019263722,5.8767813e-7,0.000018147368,0.00012396167,0.00001149262,0.000023479692,0.0066985628,0.9891885,0.0038964553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001955743,0.0000012940005,0.00016653068,0.000068755,0.000001059888,0.000017895574,0.00026437468,0.000010977678,0.000056397323,0.0021383567,0.99726653,0.0000058532714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34547204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72890186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65452796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015480979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010472985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6869223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385861986","doi":"10.59962/9780774817554-001","title":"Preface and Acknowledgments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.027541284581789467,"score_gpt":0.226447934970267,"score_spread":0.19890665038847752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385861986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020978488,0.009847937,0.005251527,0.061055586,0.14978088,0.0011788489,0.028694784,0.0016398599,0.7404527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009914629,0.005487516,0.0032107853,0.015016857,0.0155646745,0.00085529656,0.018049331,0.0009862435,0.93091464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980165,0.0003045562,0.00013861555,0.0003247312,0.0009528166,0.0002627633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909937,0.0011565161,0.00022745132,0.00048239622,0.0061937063,0.0009461998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002379509,0.0008395723,0.00075291714,0.002712326,0.006067492,0.0037478947,0.0020618995,0.0017485538,0.30796784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016745599,0.00036114408,0.00040613537,0.0023403517,0.0010047753,0.0024925391,0.0028455309,0.0041239313,0.16551472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015264655,0.00000880211,0.00010117885,0.0000791674,0.000001073011,0.000046588077,0.0002598603,0.00001771599,0.000056839825,0.0045527513,0.9794629,0.015397713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021630215,0.000004841098,0.0002530182,0.00009012062,9.487557e-7,0.000026743563,0.00019336001,0.000010202177,0.00003243321,0.00080266234,0.9985801,0.0000034112513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04587865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048725225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69203216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054383026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00794361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385865286","doi":"10.59962/9780774852159-004","title":"Policing, the Rule of Law, and Accountability in Canada: Lessons from the APEC Summit","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Accountability; Political science; Rule of law; Law; Public administration; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.048875605153209656,"score_gpt":0.25145752088269385,"score_spread":0.2025819157294842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385865286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11399592,0.040849786,0.0014571506,0.40302145,0.001575886,0.00014209267,0.001481701,0.00010908116,0.4373669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79271543,0.023547653,0.0016105496,0.019118737,0.00030585675,0.00008604908,0.00048697594,0.00011506199,0.16201366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994034,0.00056475285,0.00009879569,0.00026774744,0.002125441,0.0029091428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918309,0.0019955449,0.0002662506,0.00015952617,0.0040294016,0.0017184784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038968523,0.00056467875,0.00079058995,0.0023060092,0.0268435,0.016584124,0.0026745624,0.006198301,0.007207362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014735431,0.0005602094,0.00044482367,0.006258664,0.01255943,0.0033914591,0.0036820215,0.008892141,0.00046317477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110360146,0.00013861537,0.014084106,0.00028771913,0.000056069748,0.0005708744,0.043735933,0.0026409947,0.00016135964,0.37442514,0.37812275,0.18566608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071827526,0.000053532614,0.067072146,0.0011461222,0.00010122439,0.00012883231,0.08915388,0.002290824,0.0005130823,0.06459344,0.7746489,0.00022609417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21393079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21393079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49372047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91172886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385871509","doi":"10.59962/9780774855938-014","title":"Appendix: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021394653704819504,"score_gpt":0.1972834519380624,"score_spread":0.1758887982332429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385871509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009330067,0.0025568958,0.0012433483,0.0074386504,0.0029229585,0.00084195414,0.13007493,0.0006574127,0.8533308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006289369,0.0025622607,0.0034245597,0.0022545778,0.00041365772,0.0004394591,0.02716072,0.00038849298,0.9570669],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971219,0.00013479815,0.00014626341,0.00019645588,0.001958,0.00044273786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855326,0.001270516,0.00024592053,0.00061059924,0.011636611,0.00070383906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018799128,0.0012501302,0.0013343538,0.011060033,0.007613521,0.0063625486,0.0030518465,0.0035921007,0.2875268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012469584,0.0010840115,0.0007348491,0.017371537,0.0015697328,0.002358682,0.0010364994,0.0036938917,0.058594722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038688213,0.000005448264,0.00005723855,0.000036044858,7.742847e-7,0.000009800406,0.00003544616,0.000050456078,0.000009778718,0.008917353,0.98600173,0.0048719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006831815,0.0000015938231,0.0012080339,0.000084204476,0.0000026134942,0.000019219466,0.00007025376,0.000056229168,0.00003703999,0.0014389068,0.9970573,0.000017692164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2875268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061130136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13132429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96187294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385894989","doi":"10.59962/9780774880077-004","title":"Specific Claims in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03042405532981092,"score_gpt":0.20148688688461802,"score_spread":0.17106283155480712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385894989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0286287,0.0110196555,0.00043385295,0.048263766,0.0013287717,0.000118682,0.0018869226,0.000092066824,0.9082275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22281913,0.009288383,0.00082930544,0.021528745,0.00027827185,0.00009174751,0.0009205818,0.00010509139,0.7441387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954619,0.00020591872,0.00011371749,0.00040257417,0.0017697013,0.0020462896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960956,0.00048238132,0.00009510121,0.00014494194,0.002272552,0.00090942107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016889258,0.0006129012,0.00065166346,0.0038575872,0.02916694,0.0116258245,0.0023947412,0.0074314144,0.031122284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006925328,0.0006415078,0.0008238342,0.0062859664,0.004320912,0.0019361196,0.0032945762,0.007200899,0.0022072226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004504752,0.00006667842,0.0035808315,0.00014157844,0.00003102612,0.00066573103,0.0048051495,0.0005050983,0.00019744324,0.42343086,0.5177187,0.048811827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021444133,0.000015350794,0.012357854,0.00035861225,0.00004593236,0.0001653151,0.0068588057,0.0004105691,0.00025091937,0.014920839,0.9645175,0.000077014935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99482226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99804366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120868966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.120868966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2560898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8769698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385895032","doi":"10.59962/9780774880077","title":"By Law or In Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032795647000853176,"score_gpt":0.247668856110957,"score_spread":0.21487320911010382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385895032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000436901,0.007686511,0.00043210652,0.018903784,0.0025905732,0.000037051206,0.00017897246,0.00008440752,0.96964955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011761556,0.004124596,0.00039806403,0.018036077,0.00095640373,0.000046886747,0.00018614533,0.000119904435,0.9643704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943205,0.000850813,0.00016368122,0.0005955474,0.0030030902,0.0010662603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642986,0.0009389361,0.00014749411,0.0004972377,0.0015483372,0.0004381323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016665928,0.00060133194,0.0006781226,0.0013419234,0.009803959,0.01415787,0.0014777024,0.004503813,0.056046847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009347474,0.00036390635,0.0003546794,0.0017041626,0.010804252,0.00647714,0.00441525,0.0074050287,0.022620564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650883,0.000014490166,0.0001344886,0.00007162403,0.0000036278796,0.0000686668,0.0026586747,0.00002957567,0.00006428007,0.30733296,0.6557772,0.033836793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012360679,0.0000018417112,0.00009270673,0.000116402225,0.0000014856058,0.000022520302,0.0006361783,0.000010501738,0.00002727021,0.00735749,0.9917293,0.0000030878646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17986722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27894497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17986722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01310244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027794471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3576405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385978443","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v10i1.4376","title":"Canada: A Pathfinder in Search of a Path","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Obligation; Law; General partnership; Pathfinder; Corporal punishment; Criminology; Section (typography); Repeal; Psychology; Geography; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.025083243410967192,"score_gpt":0.2615469655937457,"score_spread":0.2364637221827785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385978443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001413744,0.012168977,0.0010144722,0.8787891,0.019611187,0.00006936793,0.0007379925,0.00018972973,0.08600544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057093352,0.030047491,0.008301335,0.4746409,0.0064642415,0.00017038651,0.0013781079,0.0008513092,0.42105284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853125,0.0013104138,0.0005261616,0.0012753096,0.008158274,0.0034171918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509392,0.006206134,0.0010222051,0.0012937685,0.028245362,0.012293432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009306794,0.0007555384,0.0012231657,0.004528778,0.026508797,0.021439953,0.0041130045,0.01678742,0.046428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037966065,0.00089210796,0.0009807732,0.0068293023,0.008068694,0.008480779,0.007044697,0.013325574,0.006906491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013579937,0.000009170453,0.00047204553,0.000104239676,0.000009777401,0.00019377605,0.0006501626,0.00005391317,0.00007947989,0.052408054,0.9281904,0.017815394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071898135,0.000003315647,0.00026791767,0.00014866723,0.0000074969794,0.000036165675,0.0007977202,0.000052053547,0.000054531098,0.0032820103,0.9953206,0.000022393802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9512051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09540394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09540394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3958506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6922073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386125806","doi":"10.1177/10575677231197754","title":"Book Review: <i>The timing of guilty pleas: Lesson from common law jurisdictions</i> by Cheng, K.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06487509257758106,"score_gpt":0.40349005784142017,"score_spread":0.3386149652638391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386125806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001461653,0.67864245,0.00072626176,0.15653707,0.14021954,0.00010391354,0.00078850525,0.00012970861,0.022706376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032696673,0.6845004,0.0010950437,0.15320022,0.0818325,0.00030373893,0.0008818834,0.00021254767,0.07470403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967039,0.0008359301,0.00028461328,0.00041640087,0.001605654,0.0001535605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760993,0.01603107,0.0010945316,0.00032480832,0.0058207945,0.0006295259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002852198,0.0012010084,0.0023639887,0.0038340313,0.0011038834,0.00410967,0.0023259625,0.0060520004,0.020485478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029277055,0.0008359768,0.0010783811,0.0056643193,0.00248241,0.0036798706,0.001207026,0.008925642,0.014406249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009109469,0.0000027205929,0.000024877803,0.0004089884,0.000007530425,0.000007953843,0.000009942142,0.000017166363,0.000013182936,0.0007011649,0.98493814,0.013859195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028124823,0.000030082392,0.00075380545,0.0030212635,0.000042081276,0.0001903962,0.000049121623,0.00006277511,0.00007562042,0.002260987,0.99345934,0.000026414327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018459482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038037658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020485478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045097587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092079695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0685308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386143797","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192859945.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sketch; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Human rights; Test (biology); Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07552678517021437,"score_gpt":0.32689772049016924,"score_spread":0.25137093531995486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386143797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005018459,0.003995377,0.0025409767,0.0074206335,0.0049326047,0.00007007737,0.0008349912,0.00024825305,0.9794551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004870294,0.0025264611,0.0012105624,0.0024279424,0.0010605993,0.000054397227,0.0007329206,0.00017577114,0.9869409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992853,0.000119184195,0.000029348123,0.00017153802,0.00031225887,0.000082474406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928087,0.00014128313,0.000028407125,0.00009648447,0.00033956737,0.00011341057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062836136,0.00064111326,0.00043423395,0.0014603948,0.0022041628,0.0048243734,0.0013957263,0.0025480096,0.3359785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018257953,0.00028554405,0.00045062494,0.0013035174,0.0013278635,0.0036100138,0.002438864,0.002853702,0.16413479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016195052,0.000031720596,0.00014856705,0.00011926376,0.0000018601206,0.0000997044,0.0006254635,0.00016622718,0.00017777944,0.20810099,0.6949579,0.095554374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.556155e-7,0.0000031584607,0.000062210216,0.000066981316,3.609675e-7,0.00003583792,0.00007809602,0.000020022144,0.00002406448,0.004764863,0.9949418,0.000001846627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065461337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006539367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6640215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030460923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021792878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94714606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386572973","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4565804","title":"Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Constitutional Subordinates or Equal Partners?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.09885225845889264,"score_gpt":0.4022402447982665,"score_spread":0.3033879863393738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386572973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46394578,0.008480348,0.0023401899,0.15455575,0.0009693275,0.00024717103,0.001010126,0.00011208845,0.36833924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95943797,0.0011063074,0.00056428125,0.009951384,0.0000876783,0.000041261555,0.000108271975,0.00004339509,0.028659426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731355,0.0023678828,0.00058240915,0.0021979953,0.005417969,0.01629828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743721,0.004582279,0.0015627835,0.0008999345,0.007533076,0.011049886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008584986,0.000510941,0.0012377063,0.0038132549,0.039465327,0.019282784,0.005429891,0.009197356,0.018794376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035482902,0.00081315846,0.00059989054,0.007644362,0.018345388,0.0065121716,0.007609664,0.01067939,0.0009116091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013964754,0.00013440677,0.032247283,0.00013782448,0.000055180524,0.0004999314,0.02064511,0.0005722732,0.00026376545,0.8358794,0.07020181,0.0392234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030930783,0.00012631463,0.18757755,0.0013550037,0.00037690823,0.00046000097,0.18842722,0.0038073082,0.0012560295,0.12413804,0.49170065,0.00046567238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8279666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17203343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35369933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96032387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386576290","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4566150","title":"A Guide to the Revised Alberta Personal Property Security Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Computer security; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022122154100201564,"score_gpt":0.3288808928558761,"score_spread":0.3067587387556745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386576290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018555138,0.026663493,0.018241033,0.063195676,0.010448992,0.0024720738,0.012561256,0.0015504551,0.8630115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010242266,0.014842287,0.029337835,0.020495748,0.0009795432,0.0014012527,0.005539013,0.00046188053,0.9167001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924315,0.002081892,0.00069237023,0.0005330454,0.006463575,0.0009859188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855278,0.0048053004,0.0002871644,0.0010322791,0.0076586227,0.00068880257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119644515,0.0014329002,0.0011643486,0.007489299,0.00637534,0.010608464,0.0045758467,0.011394025,0.047128845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024393067,0.0017777382,0.0011404961,0.0055125486,0.0052761533,0.0034727212,0.0030135105,0.010764543,0.03176274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012384186,0.000052392035,0.00031701173,0.00009028029,0.0000042746638,0.00010137533,0.00048315286,0.00038514996,0.00016104935,0.10376528,0.84556836,0.04905938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006336563,0.000011805495,0.0012543453,0.0003414905,0.0000050425097,0.000056452616,0.00028617348,0.00014921588,0.00007255603,0.008064138,0.98972243,0.000030115183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6115751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7455837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38842487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024143063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081552856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78142476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386578930","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000578576.55357.db","title":"Reasonable Doubt","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0607087812201191,"score_gpt":0.38314128467501046,"score_spread":0.3224325034548914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386578930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007017362,0.007112937,0.0021786084,0.3630507,0.08307165,0.00025014734,0.0019281455,0.0008786702,0.5408274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01479815,0.00866315,0.00183212,0.38579196,0.028793113,0.00041559388,0.0021108247,0.0006509425,0.5569441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260193,0.0016679174,0.00049163523,0.001295441,0.0028544648,0.001088661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822274,0.0039990614,0.0008149619,0.001900292,0.0069019236,0.004156343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051499326,0.0009982773,0.0010557123,0.0017390795,0.003651704,0.0102655105,0.0034052571,0.01281416,0.5207995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05965403,0.00050709804,0.0014481104,0.00097048306,0.003151397,0.0070981286,0.0052273637,0.011026725,0.31677857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001916817,0.000017630762,0.00016835982,0.00008795412,0.0000043238483,0.00022093221,0.00007466912,0.000020626903,0.000038248745,0.011393062,0.95687526,0.031079695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010776736,0.000008069232,0.000098374745,0.00026850987,0.0000029191285,0.00034630962,0.00013670413,0.000026357935,0.000029160914,0.0047773053,0.9942878,0.000007779608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030883614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038872245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5207995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034278557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077415244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68352133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386927580","doi":"10.7202/1094115ar","title":"La notion d’accident dans le cours normalde l’usage d’une automobile reliéeà l’application de la Loi sur l’assurance automobile à la lumière de l’affaire Rossy","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013921280995494183,"score_gpt":0.30828928304414926,"score_spread":0.2943680020486551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386927580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5082288,0.027322186,0.08370408,0.03394261,0.0013888133,0.00023827708,0.0016966624,0.00015842506,0.34332025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640118,0.0052670385,0.006141476,0.0005118057,0.00038040284,0.00008401878,0.0002907531,0.00002273986,0.023289936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954566,0.00093023875,0.0004705471,0.00049944303,0.0022133484,0.00042989937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264103,0.0023220147,0.002451325,0.00036045222,0.0017103005,0.0005148777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021001697,0.00052416325,0.0004109506,0.00285202,0.001941583,0.0035002176,0.00085397647,0.0018320584,0.005507247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007398565,0.00026937333,0.00074175186,0.0011706253,0.0074794837,0.003491483,0.0027836622,0.0028019634,0.0006154897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042041176,0.000117394586,0.06428295,0.00064369605,0.00013715906,0.0021735416,0.021733478,0.006032499,0.006530965,0.79922974,0.012165419,0.08653274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045662517,0.0009044835,0.27441692,0.0018754092,0.00022079656,0.007310611,0.024064612,0.0104176905,0.006774046,0.29550433,0.37792942,0.00053599733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024352867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01360865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024352867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052421233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020932874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048422277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386941184","doi":"10.7202/1091880ar","title":"Obligation de défendre : conflit d’intérêts de l’assureur","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Jonquière","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1487556443896438,"score_gpt":0.3487553981621955,"score_spread":0.19999975377255166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386941184","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014093063,0.05615237,0.029032322,0.6266833,0.0052727344,0.00013073835,0.00029242111,0.00008686655,0.26825625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487383,0.01735165,0.012165965,0.08911669,0.006754036,0.00064695906,0.00023376242,0.00020996535,0.02478276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87935233,0.06676494,0.007092795,0.009856564,0.031653263,0.005280072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7499047,0.18498346,0.01790828,0.016864743,0.024809554,0.0055293282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06891299,0.0007329471,0.0013787157,0.0037196474,0.007506995,0.021974258,0.003690913,0.022375189,0.010068644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22945262,0.0008529043,0.0011155556,0.0029128138,0.07400774,0.027905023,0.016721575,0.025149517,0.0018403752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047516827,0.000020172554,0.00077865337,0.00017281616,0.000025961746,0.00016036884,0.007803041,0.0000872892,0.00009155965,0.9458128,0.025554413,0.019445397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039302962,0.00004777506,0.0023076327,0.0015934159,0.000028846345,0.0009687412,0.007470522,0.00052112946,0.00035791096,0.7711884,0.2153608,0.000115604555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005791139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039185053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06891299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010627554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012899193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3644511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387245819","doi":"10.32920/24233083.v1","title":"The Administration of Justice? Certificate Proceedings, Charkaoui II, and the Value of Disclosure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Certificate; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Terrorism; Public administration; Administration (probate law); United States National Security Agency; Economic Justice; National security; Value (mathematics); Service (business); Human rights; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.15356717561659314,"score_gpt":0.375232122248321,"score_spread":0.22166494663172784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387245819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023874402,0.0059285234,0.0040540965,0.19517866,0.0010468918,0.00010126146,0.0001298898,0.000097685785,0.7695886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87587494,0.0032795696,0.0012800328,0.03333337,0.001149308,0.000113827366,0.00005751192,0.00008591526,0.08482561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747405,0.0091202995,0.0009058581,0.0019148609,0.0067175124,0.0066009164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542302,0.02405735,0.005098549,0.0036297324,0.008686482,0.0042976323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02204854,0.0002814933,0.0005631445,0.0023064723,0.0136574535,0.025713254,0.0025336696,0.009475096,0.009446591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070288576,0.000399396,0.000360288,0.0027085054,0.023337943,0.0093736295,0.006974672,0.011063799,0.0014858426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136956305,0.000013482477,0.00076890946,0.000023501192,0.0000047415947,0.00008601775,0.0018207761,0.000085302454,0.000031657077,0.9645594,0.020448824,0.012143758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050674833,0.00007099351,0.005673023,0.00077419885,0.00005130254,0.00038931318,0.009112532,0.00085085566,0.00071651075,0.48173493,0.5004698,0.00010591953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09001795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09514309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09001795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018388137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040039826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17898798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387245896","doi":"10.32920/24233083","title":"The Administration of Justice? Certificate Proceedings, Charkaoui II, and the Value of Disclosure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Political science; Terrorism; Agency (philosophy); Certificate; Public administration; United States National Security Agency; Economic Justice; National security; Administration (probate law); Human rights; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.15356717561659314,"score_gpt":0.375232122248321,"score_spread":0.22166494663172784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387245896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023874402,0.0059285234,0.0040540965,0.19517866,0.0010468918,0.00010126146,0.0001298898,0.000097685785,0.7695886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87587494,0.0032795696,0.0012800328,0.03333337,0.001149308,0.000113827366,0.00005751192,0.00008591526,0.08482561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747405,0.0091202995,0.0009058581,0.0019148609,0.0067175124,0.0066009164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542302,0.02405735,0.005098549,0.0036297324,0.008686482,0.0042976323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02204854,0.0002814933,0.0005631445,0.0023064723,0.0136574535,0.025713254,0.0025336696,0.009475096,0.009446591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070288576,0.000399396,0.000360288,0.0027085054,0.023337943,0.0093736295,0.006974672,0.011063799,0.0014858426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136956305,0.000013482477,0.00076890946,0.000023501192,0.0000047415947,0.00008601775,0.0018207761,0.000085302454,0.000031657077,0.9645594,0.020448824,0.012143758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050674833,0.00007099351,0.005673023,0.00077419885,0.00005130254,0.00038931318,0.009112532,0.00085085566,0.00071651075,0.48173493,0.5004698,0.00010591953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09001795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09514309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09001795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018388137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040039826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17898798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387307864","doi":"10.32920/24237007","title":"Whither International Law? Security Certificates, the Supreme Court, and the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International human rights law; Principle of legality; Human rights; International law; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Public international law; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.04491864003135857,"score_gpt":0.3040954948744174,"score_spread":0.2591768548430588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387307864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4140001,0.013310498,0.000894475,0.18694988,0.0008711602,0.00009238527,0.00069106556,0.00004977172,0.38314068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419165,0.0036682738,0.00032116924,0.008896352,0.00009943099,0.0000146109,0.00012351372,0.000023957293,0.044936106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969234,0.000196529,0.00005208747,0.00025117514,0.0007682074,0.0018086808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959363,0.0007514778,0.0002588307,0.00008005457,0.0012042297,0.0017691597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015661645,0.00024740526,0.00039888974,0.001548904,0.027666936,0.011980968,0.0018976189,0.0033569357,0.009432658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053983317,0.00034047136,0.0004104348,0.002972717,0.012671026,0.0028172813,0.002853937,0.005850038,0.00028054457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072264585,0.000088460416,0.026171211,0.00011780641,0.000032285607,0.0011507535,0.025404865,0.0009150032,0.00031301012,0.83032125,0.08344214,0.031970877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008954529,0.000054432785,0.11569097,0.0007607657,0.00015512227,0.0004331918,0.111335374,0.0037144034,0.0010249534,0.077446684,0.6889664,0.00032820532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2099396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2099396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2735066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9163581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388068924","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0015","title":"What’s in a Name: Who Benefits From The Publication Ban In Sexual Assault Trials:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pseudonym; Sexual assault; Criminal trial; Law; Fair trial; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control","score_opus":0.1953837229529289,"score_gpt":0.36497961424524067,"score_spread":0.16959589129231176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388068924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004738764,0.16280788,0.0038717906,0.48498505,0.0049669542,0.0001437407,0.000475037,0.000107460175,0.33790332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17527863,0.19697729,0.007376796,0.38821453,0.017271461,0.0007150043,0.000477148,0.0003964616,0.21329269],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924154,0.0052092024,0.00029769036,0.00025863884,0.0014384881,0.00038062653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722402,0.022468891,0.0009459763,0.00060391566,0.0023865541,0.0013544825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014679406,0.00024407778,0.0006823403,0.0010309927,0.0016551417,0.0052913986,0.0012174393,0.004481676,0.014790974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035296205,0.00024902064,0.00033059556,0.0015253999,0.0044609196,0.0065991585,0.0011358632,0.0052448437,0.003935553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024921386,0.00007984451,0.0007635528,0.0012367344,0.00003186705,0.00023090074,0.002992859,0.00013844094,0.00040432968,0.1874077,0.4410523,0.36541232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017388588,0.00007920334,0.0023686297,0.0067226663,0.00008965137,0.00033996924,0.0018618914,0.00027123227,0.0004293845,0.1068445,0.8807598,0.00005913794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03505507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092430405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03505507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061030434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013763619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07763302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388120969","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0008","title":"The New Zealand Bill of Rights Experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Parliament; Charter; Political science; White paper; Law; Government (linguistics); White (mutation); Fundamental rights; Public administration; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.0371073726653522,"score_gpt":0.3102528343357002,"score_spread":0.27314546167034803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388120969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015710453,0.0068098055,0.0003388009,0.0537649,0.0006967441,0.000058123635,0.00016970436,0.00003633595,0.9224152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25482693,0.012593213,0.0010199335,0.01146154,0.00032832738,0.00018576105,0.00027082206,0.00022860616,0.71908486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510765,0.0010269096,0.00015222422,0.00045638028,0.001966009,0.0012908872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968935,0.0007311813,0.000188214,0.00036130936,0.00067718147,0.0011485973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059438804,0.00046175328,0.00050163403,0.0016441535,0.010804247,0.010773819,0.0014787709,0.004360233,0.0413257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009146054,0.0005968289,0.00047987528,0.003084217,0.013031353,0.01051093,0.0056118905,0.0057351277,0.0036027161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026283615,0.0000417339,0.00068873947,0.000120849756,0.000004434988,0.0007606399,0.017711343,0.0000961831,0.00025006643,0.687108,0.25997096,0.03322079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075907224,0.000005706847,0.001154606,0.00010995615,0.0000016305341,0.000111643945,0.0031104889,0.00003189192,0.000045281366,0.0077837748,0.98762614,0.000011242395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62506753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7240447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62506753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041552138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026275648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75428104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388146991","doi":"10.1515/9781773851181-008","title":"The Text Book Edition of James Kent’s Commentaries Used in Canada v. Gerring","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0340172747017374,"score_gpt":0.2149737153614228,"score_spread":0.18095644065968539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388146991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013948986,0.027517203,0.0010541299,0.13173728,0.015709812,0.00010722975,0.0029098217,0.00023226591,0.8193375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0114740655,0.0056278263,0.00061009364,0.04954639,0.0011692664,0.00005991758,0.00047029517,0.00022286936,0.9308192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797446,0.0003026461,0.00006873992,0.00015581367,0.0011686939,0.00032961255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971301,0.0012439857,0.0000900526,0.00011204961,0.001257289,0.00016653172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015374954,0.0008174268,0.0005535909,0.0023452144,0.008468439,0.005532829,0.0021532134,0.006541939,0.048288632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063939374,0.00059271057,0.0004441432,0.0034239385,0.0031423161,0.0024986903,0.0013920313,0.006212675,0.012520979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003830457,0.0000027928145,0.00003500922,0.000023341127,8.247651e-7,0.000027505612,0.00031435155,0.000020296768,0.000030370247,0.014166774,0.9825587,0.0028160964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001723296,0.0000014784197,0.00045672563,0.00009554258,0.0000018758902,0.000023478917,0.00037776292,0.00002409186,0.00007152847,0.002117386,0.99681693,0.000011497097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61443824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8626935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38556176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019749166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012829014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7756648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147000","doi":"10.1515/9781773851181-003","title":"Family Defamation in the Quebec Civil Courts: The View from the Archives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.054873643064652686,"score_gpt":0.23531563273843217,"score_spread":0.1804419896737795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08253139,0.07062776,0.0006935925,0.36125967,0.0014477811,0.00008953409,0.0008716203,0.00008418839,0.48239452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5763783,0.02475048,0.0007199333,0.034571495,0.0006523542,0.00005838345,0.00019028728,0.00006935336,0.36260945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653244,0.0006865261,0.000068947644,0.00020445973,0.0009084868,0.0015991853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931162,0.0020450482,0.00039256274,0.00031344022,0.003017223,0.0011155137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030988897,0.00029788943,0.0004752326,0.0018985656,0.02134014,0.012950591,0.0026423302,0.008635923,0.020659095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010328669,0.00056833477,0.00046139842,0.0032970933,0.009407421,0.0038636462,0.002339369,0.008209321,0.0008751308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056350804,0.00006354577,0.0063398136,0.00019298338,0.000028433144,0.0011585188,0.028301537,0.00070345565,0.00018074921,0.44925544,0.4421512,0.07156797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023983199,0.00003057223,0.026366532,0.0010566938,0.000050849772,0.00059015147,0.035367396,0.00071388663,0.00035041396,0.017737383,0.9176095,0.00010256058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093061015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093061015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13950843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6752081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147586","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199278091.003.0012","title":"Oral Confessions To Non-Investigator Witnesses","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Criminal investigation; Recall; Psychology; Political science; Law; History; Geography; Cognitive psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06620973512286499,"score_gpt":0.3456236893756851,"score_spread":0.2794139542528201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10121211,0.0064348257,0.004237318,0.025276171,0.00684208,0.00018847085,0.000579289,0.00013041953,0.8550995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5884422,0.0049678083,0.0016589165,0.005329205,0.0031054576,0.00015447642,0.00039747785,0.00012606158,0.39581838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985259,0.0008545263,0.000069670714,0.00010880828,0.00033038214,0.00011068874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928611,0.0050406707,0.0007407472,0.0004950693,0.0005658567,0.00029644743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015040246,0.00027843364,0.00026034153,0.00066589075,0.0016670696,0.0024166096,0.00047564867,0.00125996,0.028377403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017069222,0.00017561307,0.00017489452,0.00040538303,0.001675834,0.0019176523,0.0024702472,0.002603397,0.0052484223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002698103,0.00015524778,0.0027538503,0.00053599593,0.000029736433,0.004547607,0.084478736,0.00015028674,0.00277506,0.34163922,0.37432262,0.1883419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029878856,0.00012945753,0.0026793175,0.0007989514,0.000015906753,0.0036027345,0.026824635,0.0002360077,0.0022498118,0.022528714,0.94087666,0.000027995286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032915676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006151048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028377403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005453749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035215565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0949319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147707","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199571796.003.0003","title":"Tock-Tick: The Working of a Judicial Mind","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Sentence; Statement (logic); Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.08734618662814995,"score_gpt":0.32747795583048667,"score_spread":0.2401317692023367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065267175,0.007941807,0.007598551,0.0735552,0.0012377021,0.000022104881,0.00005916718,0.00007573078,0.90298307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6164481,0.005855887,0.0058598705,0.016440362,0.001173335,0.00005884892,0.00007902285,0.00019845078,0.35388613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849653,0.00085391465,0.00002859545,0.00016437695,0.00029543389,0.00016121301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975407,0.0014094132,0.00008492499,0.00019878478,0.0004995419,0.0002666104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025479647,0.00021400016,0.00023044474,0.0006085574,0.004118027,0.008479777,0.0008964792,0.002820677,0.015891574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006165125,0.00025193894,0.0001640501,0.00057047256,0.012651684,0.0056986213,0.0017143101,0.004472565,0.002061349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068702675,0.000008085509,0.00009435341,0.000022530885,0.0000019153827,0.00007634125,0.005916718,0.000095189986,0.00010157486,0.91176695,0.069364555,0.0125450585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014541537,0.000010267346,0.0004065375,0.00026058056,0.0000037269117,0.00010145885,0.005914344,0.00062759797,0.00022341743,0.4986026,0.4938181,0.000016734475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079249935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02195644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015891574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036866232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004420835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053162634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388183427","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195141245.003.0004","title":"Penal Developments in English-Speaking Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05359571719700974,"score_gpt":0.31210331109604794,"score_spread":0.2585075938990382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388183427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03054815,0.024581457,0.00021545307,0.0037423337,0.00034425102,0.000010129945,0.00008332526,0.000010524921,0.9404643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5132828,0.040011004,0.00042777046,0.0018048219,0.00044092297,0.00002988899,0.00016548266,0.000021316762,0.44381592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998241,0.0000599878,0.000007041966,0.000018101908,0.00005333589,0.000037521695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977726,0.00009389815,0.000021124497,0.00001154756,0.000071642295,0.000024591087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032322502,0.00014945,0.00008592474,0.00083061826,0.0012212587,0.0019898165,0.0001980093,0.00034946058,0.0066751633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047308733,0.000070829345,0.0000844867,0.0010225758,0.00087358616,0.00085952936,0.0008300894,0.00082579086,0.00047410934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022047489,0.0000811144,0.0022777733,0.0002183451,0.000006847237,0.0006983865,0.01570228,0.000716915,0.00040476755,0.7785967,0.08761476,0.11366008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004664064,0.000020825699,0.011247375,0.00055267144,0.0000051423,0.00020975401,0.0037718997,0.00022841047,0.0002938479,0.011978005,0.9716793,0.0000082541765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019551812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049699113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019551812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020851127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010648567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038875997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417797","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198256977.001.0001","title":"Contempt Of Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Political science; Human rights; Convention","score_opus":0.05053437488703912,"score_gpt":0.33709853552399544,"score_spread":0.28656416063695633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008014486,0.001436005,0.007034285,0.017272264,0.0011417307,0.00013672948,0.00009127685,0.00007621224,0.964797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66369045,0.0026824237,0.0033011087,0.03223401,0.0017503586,0.0003361413,0.00019022345,0.0001558546,0.29565948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895795,0.003228302,0.0005225133,0.0016085912,0.003023079,0.0020381354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927677,0.0033770418,0.00065821083,0.0010487611,0.001080485,0.0010677103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056374595,0.0006158453,0.0004750795,0.0013829344,0.0076171253,0.00859702,0.0022087903,0.0065517826,0.028367503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020008558,0.00043370257,0.0007430133,0.0009539529,0.013337071,0.0074173654,0.009689515,0.008144943,0.004714264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016377438,0.000018500143,0.00046698138,0.000037514368,0.0000027267604,0.000488777,0.0036531126,0.00017037582,0.0003017201,0.9553902,0.023969533,0.015484155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145905815,0.00006575402,0.0009888454,0.0006535669,0.000006687723,0.00063768984,0.0041140974,0.00049298356,0.00073146896,0.4040184,0.5882378,0.000038134018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046637035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049779927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028367503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004399835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071500633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0948987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388432072","doi":"10.61737/tnps5755","title":"Cadre juridique applicable à l’utilisation de la reconnaissance faciale par les forces de police dans l’espace public au Québec et au Canada : éléments de comparaison avec les États-Unis et l’Europe : rapport","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09604136630153566,"score_gpt":0.335079966514459,"score_spread":0.23903860021292334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388432072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48247293,0.008589516,0.01431393,0.035196193,0.001127412,0.00067026226,0.01502341,0.00041409678,0.44219223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89697474,0.004185623,0.0067239003,0.0018873576,0.00013402241,0.00036644703,0.0036470958,0.00011648621,0.085964285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918222,0.0012814112,0.00031020417,0.00079221686,0.004238589,0.0015552912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738777,0.0025537356,0.0014574551,0.0009032438,0.018849215,0.0023585916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006131562,0.00068739144,0.0006911587,0.005503188,0.008766694,0.008732777,0.002085476,0.0011899412,0.026265789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020636214,0.00038637748,0.0007771423,0.0070472825,0.0032855181,0.0028200157,0.0037877636,0.0020445678,0.0023954941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002769644,0.00013817732,0.48280242,0.0011105937,0.00028330562,0.00067646673,0.07269735,0.0047620963,0.0012683317,0.059488375,0.10605906,0.27043685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000188059,0.00009919124,0.6951317,0.0013378882,0.00014928616,0.0002145254,0.08775119,0.0016798963,0.00084851944,0.0033802139,0.20919777,0.00019095738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97461593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04420727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04420727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074596666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32074773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388435064","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199246342.005.0001","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Human rights; Political science; Law; Civil rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.0453343866732524,"score_gpt":0.2943468934764826,"score_spread":0.24901250680323017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388435064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095731625,0.010439862,0.0013623893,0.028567687,0.0031355415,0.00017298269,0.0033124916,0.00015794853,0.9518938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027148327,0.009246417,0.00331572,0.0055340105,0.00067769724,0.0001686301,0.0013854423,0.00022590221,0.95229787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921936,0.0005312224,0.00019755433,0.0005708862,0.0052710176,0.0012357972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99386203,0.00048783157,0.00009422464,0.00043377574,0.0044237087,0.0006985073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039543384,0.0010507386,0.000983298,0.0072836415,0.015452274,0.012705099,0.0024583347,0.00463428,0.052908547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011313002,0.0010646184,0.00064758526,0.0086943,0.008217081,0.004066828,0.0024821656,0.0077778045,0.007370223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036925792,0.000005810893,0.000109005436,0.00003234152,0.0000019141526,0.000014956814,0.0004168476,0.00006193181,0.0000206624,0.3054158,0.6764096,0.017507333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023415714,0.0000016615664,0.0006017147,0.00009847996,0.0000028636557,0.00001232653,0.00025785723,0.00004784399,0.000028061646,0.010445126,0.9884864,0.000015438478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98776054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99217504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103127144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103127144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2532554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74824333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388435236","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199246342.001.0001","title":"Fair Trial Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to a fair trial; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Charter; Convention; Reservation of rights; Criminal justice; Ex post facto law; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.06271582959452816,"score_gpt":0.3561109550655135,"score_spread":0.29339512547098534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388435236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030353572,0.0022763587,0.004606372,0.0057039945,0.0013981992,0.000081513506,0.00013127684,0.0000941744,0.98540455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020174956,0.0023296815,0.002594485,0.006601916,0.0009820488,0.00017386566,0.00026947338,0.00015944938,0.966714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941527,0.0013984271,0.00027102017,0.00076387654,0.0028889142,0.0005249666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963331,0.0013195346,0.00013561749,0.0008168741,0.0011629731,0.00023174472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003660064,0.0006007336,0.00073410367,0.0011679583,0.0038134577,0.008955348,0.0016507823,0.004988308,0.109254695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012453013,0.000373563,0.0006349322,0.0008325089,0.0069864294,0.0070066745,0.003442431,0.0053562573,0.0371323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000794156,0.000011914533,0.00003526223,0.00005903983,0.0000022737138,0.000045836972,0.0004943371,0.0001231334,0.00005840305,0.80918616,0.15993863,0.030037032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000472555,0.000008908549,0.00008256771,0.00022540394,0.0000023604766,0.00006981835,0.00016710263,0.00008383926,0.00009396637,0.11471354,0.88454014,0.000007660778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004999314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006225536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109254695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003945246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053272657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36549336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439169","doi":"10.7202/1091950ar","title":"L’obligation de défendre de l’assureur de responsabilité civile en droit québécois : aide-mémoire de doctrine et de jurisprudence","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Obligation; Political science; Doctrine; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.035410507157508986,"score_gpt":0.35260473368603334,"score_spread":0.31719422652852436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1319473,0.029436268,0.0109327575,0.35107195,0.0013829899,0.000122525,0.00041451884,0.00005290905,0.47463888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89312416,0.0063651195,0.0039889757,0.019114003,0.00028466506,0.0000613205,0.00007523153,0.00003046341,0.07695595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931479,0.0017894595,0.00027040977,0.00059346075,0.0025273138,0.0016713719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901064,0.003832392,0.00056785514,0.00053225405,0.0038469806,0.0011141266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007226347,0.00033975806,0.00042896732,0.0012344961,0.010244684,0.0063727396,0.0015190134,0.007375601,0.007070417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012286098,0.00041626667,0.00044706158,0.00096917694,0.019292103,0.0026642517,0.0029987078,0.009378656,0.00036447714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002859091,0.000033195367,0.0043847864,0.00012645073,0.000029031404,0.00055776985,0.018020222,0.00052415824,0.0006743605,0.91306835,0.039458543,0.023094656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052906173,0.000059798094,0.037968274,0.0013697889,0.000059565413,0.00065787375,0.015778303,0.0014386396,0.0011742018,0.1410259,0.80020154,0.0002132186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91998863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94699013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08001137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04589391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07563785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33298516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388445333","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4619067","title":"Submission to Justice Canada on the Criminalization of Coercive Control","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.028107110426717093,"score_gpt":0.3143298831449935,"score_spread":0.2862227727182764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388445333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03111675,0.007881785,0.0007754148,0.6946497,0.042259842,0.00108222,0.003111513,0.00015740261,0.21896528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20282792,0.0073011965,0.0016418163,0.488598,0.011630406,0.0006003367,0.0011970166,0.00021110498,0.2859922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96260977,0.0042000157,0.0025513843,0.0023314024,0.01371788,0.014589502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91742545,0.023066182,0.0021348442,0.0027406476,0.042566232,0.012066708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01582647,0.0012956144,0.0027904143,0.0048087095,0.03364053,0.013152645,0.0067084404,0.051986523,0.012436951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077918045,0.001284639,0.0016978581,0.0038582599,0.00824252,0.0027626914,0.0058761,0.032570116,0.0019846219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015252337,0.000109836044,0.003057612,0.00021511786,0.00006962873,0.00092582434,0.0026336878,0.00027904077,0.00035396824,0.029069217,0.9529227,0.010210933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020354189,0.00016332947,0.026174683,0.0014201462,0.00023419154,0.00030853492,0.010832315,0.0009765345,0.0010144971,0.010876548,0.94737524,0.00042031496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9521096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06362042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06362042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3242088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4616006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388984871","doi":"10.1515/9780776625980-013","title":"Saskatchewan Penitentiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.04976794912855472,"score_gpt":0.2636307708269299,"score_spread":0.2138628216983752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388984871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067205774,0.007168656,0.00022415388,0.0030811166,0.0006557552,0.000037797152,0.00043717495,0.000058760357,0.9816159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013544187,0.00337717,0.00013186662,0.000568242,0.000015295811,0.000017877072,0.00014542561,0.000019741708,0.98218024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998727,0.000014684654,0.0000042504003,0.00002725908,0.000034380257,0.000046701214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998691,0.000020258587,0.0000057493994,0.0000094180805,0.000063594336,0.00003179018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012617031,0.0005647727,0.0002024276,0.0006514533,0.0054524336,0.0027782947,0.0009178668,0.0010814067,0.11279642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029994018,0.00025860535,0.00012364062,0.0013884963,0.001269781,0.0011713833,0.001163904,0.0019039443,0.018633178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005275809,0.00006989525,0.00226714,0.00042707473,0.000008704732,0.002685414,0.009579929,0.00026704048,0.002044717,0.16056655,0.61251503,0.20951577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021987466,0.0000069496023,0.0013920404,0.00016450383,0.0000024359642,0.00018559025,0.0030135592,0.000032313335,0.00021700781,0.001010221,0.99396557,0.0000075600274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59218264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.908341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40781736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01348231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011106327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82043815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389050268","doi":"10.29173/wclawr100","title":"The Plea of Innocence: Restoring the Truth to the American Justice System","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Plea; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07288576524903469,"score_gpt":0.392702693195836,"score_spread":0.31981692794680133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389050268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002197906,0.024299407,0.0009009936,0.88670915,0.025600014,0.00005897153,0.00012611283,0.00006258716,0.060044844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096201606,0.031520598,0.001848803,0.78597784,0.032107204,0.0003056114,0.00017774025,0.00012826336,0.05173225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98082125,0.0086964285,0.0013376791,0.001640603,0.0059356405,0.001568473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93656653,0.040390387,0.002232917,0.0030337444,0.014544554,0.0032318227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027391348,0.00041137822,0.0009794468,0.003031208,0.009579221,0.015184564,0.0023448898,0.023561483,0.009208817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1206852,0.000684826,0.0006931317,0.0013845573,0.01197823,0.009290984,0.004002376,0.018888682,0.002662243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006740775,0.000046927464,0.00053995854,0.0004161345,0.000030909203,0.00025224773,0.00065393426,0.000112068825,0.00020713783,0.091768615,0.8483638,0.057540923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005739645,0.000041541243,0.0023523467,0.003440801,0.00009344623,0.00019575602,0.0014297356,0.0004065434,0.00046884362,0.13489981,0.8565278,0.0000861042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03727814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067083694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03727814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060173213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032781348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14486098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389050279","doi":"10.29173/wclawr97","title":"Queer in Fear: The Role of Homophobia and Transphobia in Wrongful Convictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transphobia; Queer; Prejudice (legal term); Criminology; Criminal justice; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Transgender; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.027931934192261688,"score_gpt":0.3231997813060729,"score_spread":0.2952678471138112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389050279","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19815981,0.40920654,0.0013891315,0.15777265,0.00087513693,0.00009270345,0.000407761,0.000017559412,0.23207873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8233232,0.15733336,0.00030692568,0.012958319,0.00054730993,0.00003015342,0.00013086287,0.000012477898,0.005357358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680376,0.0013877847,0.00013531017,0.00022197628,0.00083811255,0.00061301835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910918,0.0052938983,0.0016064858,0.0002632459,0.0012218272,0.00052277086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057288855,0.00017632837,0.0005009648,0.0022344603,0.0024824834,0.003981268,0.0009257236,0.0015686988,0.00474479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015277447,0.00020077873,0.00049822,0.0022733589,0.009759984,0.0024871223,0.002019155,0.0034174984,0.00019017055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021187046,0.00020349187,0.11108533,0.0036636363,0.00047346906,0.0022214476,0.048045848,0.00034430402,0.00036163602,0.4583319,0.027029578,0.34802753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101787235,0.00019776904,0.49346453,0.017902385,0.0010445194,0.0026932843,0.10655889,0.00037115198,0.0005315584,0.11487576,0.26210338,0.00015488983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3785498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53638065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3785498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007151343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013638958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7526928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389107446","doi":"10.1163/9789004479593_003","title":"Preface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06794273723833068,"score_gpt":0.33578140403283735,"score_spread":0.2678386667945067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389107446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007067621,0.0046161986,0.0020133452,0.009000198,0.034935553,0.00019288957,0.0035557302,0.0006604751,0.94431895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034821122,0.0032927946,0.0010745795,0.0024179735,0.0045827627,0.0001002702,0.0031825334,0.0004184766,0.9814485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.000075205186,0.000034850338,0.000115556875,0.0003736278,0.00006555086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982765,0.0003047785,0.000059293427,0.00016262777,0.00092613784,0.00027074336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007064184,0.00067239255,0.0005387153,0.0016044,0.0025225445,0.0035051785,0.0012357786,0.0010630535,0.44687495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004314274,0.000274276,0.0003993149,0.0016035204,0.0006944874,0.0027594182,0.0016641002,0.0024752603,0.27177995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011586073,0.000015383112,0.00008879434,0.000064302985,8.4861813e-7,0.00003592974,0.00015335513,0.00004726115,0.00007766488,0.00831014,0.9514831,0.039711714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2948125e-7,0.000004545546,0.00011738399,0.000050149407,3.4614195e-7,0.000025834084,0.00006749183,0.000010593837,0.00001910127,0.00075220596,0.99894994,0.0000014576234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005793604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008589614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.553125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019354749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023377156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332677","doi":"10.7202/1107386ar","title":"PERSPECTIVES POUR UN PRINCIPE DE SÉCURITÉ JURIDIQUE EN DROIT CANADIEN : LES PISTES DU DROIT EUROPÉEN","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.009678190695934698,"score_gpt":0.22155146753008895,"score_spread":0.21187327683415424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14779752,0.09964548,0.003931292,0.20176353,0.002024727,0.000095148105,0.00035908312,0.000052635096,0.54433066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736458,0.03712032,0.0019811057,0.014347833,0.0006068341,0.0000997883,0.00014808202,0.000046589495,0.072003566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690455,0.0010542838,0.00009175648,0.00039338155,0.0005776921,0.000978315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976301,0.0009929466,0.00025134673,0.000101258775,0.00059499696,0.00042931375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004524534,0.0006734633,0.00056687894,0.0038861078,0.012971466,0.014222098,0.001957559,0.005104512,0.012813968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005620087,0.0003157146,0.00053539994,0.004101797,0.016298914,0.0066373865,0.0047246367,0.0062878965,0.0009217036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032532695,0.000033091048,0.0040791077,0.00017764272,0.000021778562,0.00063892006,0.08978874,0.00037787185,0.00013420025,0.87396437,0.009414756,0.021336908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030567637,0.000048440386,0.015724882,0.0023132032,0.000041516916,0.0005354195,0.1277904,0.00032403125,0.0003562682,0.104464665,0.7482802,0.00009041437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33061168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36264792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6693883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020753559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023943147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6573746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332922","doi":"10.7202/1106030ar","title":"LES DOMMAGES PUNITIFS EN DROIT QUÉBÉCOIS : TRADITION, ÉVOLUTION ET… RÉVOLUTION ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.026007284179518968,"score_gpt":0.25758895508544927,"score_spread":0.2315816709059303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36403647,0.023981394,0.002748297,0.08892748,0.0008285057,0.00005652497,0.00043716427,0.00006313392,0.5189211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852745,0.0031153562,0.0005911907,0.0038020676,0.00010472416,0.000027324142,0.00006380285,0.000033623917,0.10698743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980878,0.00031196084,0.00003553392,0.00031282275,0.00039395026,0.00085778564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837095,0.0003257015,0.0002059505,0.00012905618,0.00058208825,0.00038637585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017948287,0.00035112348,0.00042652042,0.0016220176,0.019398358,0.008763392,0.0016237885,0.0025907056,0.0075349463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002743512,0.0002845505,0.0002365173,0.0029245038,0.023050442,0.0025820397,0.001755556,0.0044384487,0.0003637834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042655054,0.000028255608,0.008069976,0.000085484266,0.000021373044,0.00033586158,0.10505724,0.00030605035,0.00039139285,0.8218968,0.021949058,0.04181592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028148344,0.00004438669,0.077620596,0.0006371019,0.000043672077,0.00025688394,0.07370687,0.0006879857,0.0005343286,0.03838369,0.8079052,0.0001511379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088388264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088388264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062461637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64130473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355440","doi":"10.7202/1105803ar","title":"DU NON-DROIT DE L’APPLICATION DE LA CHARTE CANADIENNE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.014526274813882745,"score_gpt":0.24418930310009532,"score_spread":0.22966302828621257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012277843,0.007688728,0.020376246,0.13065907,0.0030159599,0.00011858539,0.00021435047,0.00007046143,0.82557875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57965267,0.009935643,0.012327679,0.037986495,0.002286108,0.00037521726,0.00021827138,0.00026977732,0.3569481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831198,0.0064348322,0.00038263042,0.0017566505,0.0063672597,0.0019388483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891088,0.004894981,0.0005415546,0.0010896478,0.0036514313,0.00071354234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00816406,0.00071614195,0.00075054885,0.0018372218,0.010087411,0.01666672,0.0022938116,0.006583376,0.012364175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01608729,0.00043051317,0.0008805761,0.0019671998,0.025643565,0.0063388105,0.0059859254,0.01399586,0.002051625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005875077,0.000004906026,0.00011521316,0.000029292834,0.00000321619,0.000031903925,0.0025942018,0.00007048059,0.0000658767,0.98978525,0.0045057,0.0027881109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020794681,0.000036605466,0.0014435363,0.00047979716,0.000021985988,0.000117316136,0.006100789,0.00049853814,0.00061716145,0.29452664,0.6960862,0.00005066602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21142523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28640518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02368559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038212422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42038924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389363178","doi":"10.7202/1105765ar","title":"LA « RAISONNABILITÉ » SELON DUNSMUIR : DICHOTOMIE ENTRE LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ET LA COUR D’APPEL DU QUÉBEC","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Valacta (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009245957935380033,"score_gpt":0.22109475811620077,"score_spread":0.21184880018082075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389363178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3283226,0.004136795,0.0048446413,0.031135883,0.00023561939,0.00007204636,0.00015742076,0.000042014293,0.6310529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658658,0.0005797388,0.0003801806,0.001284258,0.000018551851,0.000014734202,0.000018612423,0.000013452427,0.031824596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946248,0.0011413007,0.00008129603,0.00056687597,0.0018332063,0.0017524635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960812,0.000945911,0.0003093401,0.00020015285,0.0016355789,0.00082788826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024508538,0.0002940564,0.00032504948,0.00092521735,0.018893272,0.00969271,0.0012755904,0.0019990383,0.0058314204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004947392,0.00022163289,0.0003186007,0.001269093,0.018087953,0.0015234512,0.0027263656,0.003877188,0.00028777833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004781,0.000024518411,0.010416019,0.00006709053,0.000030133378,0.00029919416,0.078968786,0.0005825478,0.0007599711,0.8774858,0.009094943,0.022223232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035344707,0.00010039142,0.110467084,0.0007557792,0.00013831112,0.00025600728,0.15491861,0.001578002,0.0018605434,0.07962904,0.65000325,0.00025763494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97306067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09516209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09516209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09474639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6904526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389676937","doi":"10.1515/9780889778276-034","title":"Appendix: Timeline of Gehl v Canada","year":2021,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Appendix; History; Geography; Archaeology; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.038338869945772,"score_gpt":0.23051730310071977,"score_spread":0.19217843315494776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389676937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015436462,0.0020363359,0.00062084716,0.008377226,0.0021247335,0.0010733623,0.2949179,0.0005839238,0.6887221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013097107,0.0026082888,0.0009342521,0.0057311445,0.000575987,0.0010147281,0.0636145,0.0005114919,0.91191256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979777,0.000096429976,0.00008633168,0.00018539673,0.001059933,0.00059428706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908766,0.0013098636,0.00032146857,0.00027308796,0.006649281,0.0005696138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009513425,0.0013263349,0.0011768977,0.009111854,0.005168116,0.004261483,0.0023775739,0.004431482,0.3993543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008344573,0.0010307713,0.0008385853,0.011858343,0.00077885564,0.0024149616,0.0012093517,0.002954496,0.09859363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013295414,0.000009288079,0.0001301507,0.00007373008,0.0000017097628,0.000035019464,0.000043200067,0.00004186631,0.000018045534,0.0032482208,0.9935302,0.0028552685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024732124,0.0000060015263,0.0037461428,0.00015046031,0.000006659462,0.00006662077,0.00021503109,0.00006267837,0.00009453372,0.0010348181,0.9945741,0.000018240778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94033635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3993543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040628728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058791675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85674816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390033283","doi":"10.7202/1106940ar","title":"La cessation de l’indemnisation du criminelde la route : une analyse constitutionnelle","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07570058635646965,"score_gpt":0.3611052929968608,"score_spread":0.28540470664039114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390033283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25682163,0.007065049,0.007689977,0.027937375,0.00029252522,0.00013483579,0.00079639006,0.000052030402,0.6992102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90486306,0.0023763159,0.0010376233,0.0015307325,0.00008558462,0.000098657816,0.00015898477,0.00006712113,0.08978208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734,0.00053876516,0.00005871009,0.00038015775,0.0008506705,0.0008316688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961081,0.0009296056,0.00034891695,0.000311457,0.0019714956,0.00033036384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023068683,0.00031843642,0.00047044264,0.001957314,0.011896869,0.010724863,0.0017732161,0.0024306828,0.015269938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004357532,0.00033705527,0.000537377,0.0024700619,0.014920248,0.003350809,0.0021118813,0.0036815577,0.00066941686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027100145,0.000022617942,0.006924094,0.00010985372,0.000022011596,0.0002039258,0.055904534,0.00040292722,0.00027414484,0.917689,0.0077987043,0.010621071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030296314,0.000059055234,0.0916256,0.0010421185,0.00011869883,0.00025292972,0.12003909,0.0019878724,0.0009283364,0.066618696,0.7171354,0.00016180896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90260524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90260524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057101764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043717586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41430426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390541916","doi":"","title":"Criminal liability for homicide in the Canadian Criminal Code","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminal code; Criminal liability; Criminology; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Law; Psychology; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.5279060530858918,"score_gpt":0.6087061334301103,"score_spread":0.08080008034421848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390541916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17833985,0.041469615,0.006017225,0.3557439,0.0028420729,0.00048241406,0.002807368,0.00015868552,0.41213888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274347,0.020997068,0.0067121047,0.02482495,0.0007688555,0.00012790579,0.0008913179,0.000041931235,0.018201236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971849,0.0034253069,0.0013056988,0.0011389191,0.016860032,0.005421078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688158,0.007038292,0.002947693,0.001000242,0.017087977,0.0031100577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008162214,0.00041595765,0.00069033384,0.0074860207,0.017285785,0.0062454566,0.0030715652,0.0056513245,0.002631451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0597766,0.00069143344,0.00077981956,0.00993291,0.009032628,0.002711459,0.003936174,0.0046055964,0.0002484349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005179664,0.000053647083,0.03374351,0.00033991376,0.00004796449,0.0014461764,0.008163094,0.0013982644,0.000249541,0.74127513,0.14035529,0.07287565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119268116,0.00011511907,0.34373814,0.003982174,0.0003568946,0.0026563175,0.02324518,0.0063402713,0.0008308033,0.1366499,0.48130035,0.0006655433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98860055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08813078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08813078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20431915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63943654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390694002","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4667906","title":"Informing the Debate on Lowering the Criminal Rate of Interest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interest rate; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05353096997292049,"score_gpt":0.3375794851894404,"score_spread":0.2840485152165199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390694002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003974601,0.007221783,0.0021081024,0.9577429,0.00568464,0.000027563607,0.00009391807,0.000028555623,0.023117961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2760546,0.0066360976,0.005285813,0.68266463,0.024238622,0.00023780136,0.00012978932,0.00013269055,0.0046199453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88659835,0.07453588,0.008055165,0.0069605988,0.018749213,0.0051008505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38951996,0.54269165,0.02462499,0.009671627,0.026536256,0.00695551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16187201,0.0010418415,0.0029737076,0.0043953843,0.0045056585,0.02200176,0.006637962,0.05293148,0.012341819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4607148,0.0011236779,0.0016630421,0.003952012,0.021665933,0.020082442,0.0065295915,0.062157404,0.0029910877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075881614,0.00016901953,0.0025678254,0.0012955451,0.00023411585,0.00024999483,0.0034009854,0.0009295095,0.0005553804,0.8281466,0.10905335,0.05263897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005773856,0.00023609128,0.0051741535,0.0067180437,0.00056065654,0.00020808096,0.0035067042,0.0019804342,0.0017991434,0.70953006,0.2695185,0.00019077706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005876883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063818013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16187201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076716663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01600054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85607123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600462","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1437","title":"“Silly Anecdotes”: From White Baselines to White Juries in R. v. Chouhan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); White paper; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.06038181993000382,"score_gpt":0.3639288062861421,"score_spread":0.3035469863561383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4311266,0.017820923,0.013540289,0.19741291,0.006906579,0.00033668109,0.00048612806,0.0002156046,0.3321543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346329,0.0037990578,0.0029909073,0.024223175,0.0011976071,0.00013628049,0.00011001978,0.00013626217,0.03277377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768534,0.015976183,0.00043201356,0.0012139935,0.0038195467,0.0017049211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771756,0.017096246,0.0015577796,0.0007263777,0.002245076,0.0011988559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010843512,0.0007289199,0.00062507077,0.0029369758,0.024235023,0.009178777,0.0014915606,0.004731144,0.0037717975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041755218,0.00063313026,0.00031066738,0.0022843708,0.013655582,0.0069363713,0.0076760487,0.009455135,0.00057756633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008472241,0.00004528796,0.0019943558,0.00023374724,0.000022153517,0.00318887,0.7790317,0.00011001894,0.0009769162,0.1208696,0.066668496,0.02677418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011125167,0.000046420333,0.0030686432,0.00067928317,0.000022933404,0.00096120016,0.56444734,0.00030473658,0.0007993968,0.020049985,0.40951803,0.00009080014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034518525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10713727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96548146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008499311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005110741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068635225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392456227","doi":"10.29173/wclawr108","title":"Wrongfully Convicted: Guilty Pleas, Imagined Crimes, and What Canada Must Do to Safeguard Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Safeguard; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.027691045812374113,"score_gpt":0.33729865197090986,"score_spread":0.3096076061585357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392456227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014784137,0.4570799,0.00077988236,0.4449148,0.006398256,0.000104268016,0.0015819654,0.000033069708,0.074323736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37481657,0.42890579,0.0023185671,0.16275819,0.0042369845,0.00018528028,0.0011740926,0.00007525376,0.025529237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98588645,0.0030510852,0.0010873114,0.00083881686,0.0071316464,0.0020046483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9230506,0.02569,0.0068554673,0.0017236047,0.038392656,0.004287766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016384063,0.000490125,0.0013750689,0.00591381,0.0059946105,0.01293535,0.0038157192,0.008081088,0.0068785083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10327711,0.0008402002,0.0010306686,0.005330956,0.011086899,0.00513907,0.00264529,0.012219971,0.00065625994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023239576,0.00014870391,0.025200624,0.005293186,0.00055367197,0.0003227588,0.003197457,0.00057919783,0.00014806981,0.21670124,0.4723006,0.27532205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028101343,0.00013955409,0.10972632,0.060139403,0.002099132,0.000404392,0.014865104,0.0011353131,0.00056526094,0.115453415,0.6947676,0.00042351332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9496187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054206334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24731779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3932963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392607603","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4721464","title":"The 2023 Human Rights Based Approach Framework of the Ontario Human Rights Commission is a Major Leap Forward to Serve as an Example, but also to Be Improved","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Human rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03681389245677763,"score_gpt":0.33052608665280564,"score_spread":0.293712194196028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392607603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034451247,0.002114939,0.031454038,0.13012014,0.0013458983,0.0004162388,0.0010540311,0.00017902123,0.82987064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26460856,0.0039347922,0.089706436,0.08198968,0.00097479124,0.00096978643,0.0013900825,0.0004341283,0.55599177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97401285,0.006348257,0.00081514125,0.00204587,0.013836688,0.0029412552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874659,0.001748778,0.0005241649,0.001321115,0.0071993945,0.0017406036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017648226,0.0008538785,0.0007399709,0.00395792,0.0096118115,0.013873151,0.0051372955,0.010736484,0.017177338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015272648,0.00067505334,0.0010449716,0.004201216,0.017963558,0.00554033,0.0032786594,0.008888188,0.004547154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053008243,0.000010636349,0.00031139186,0.00004035392,0.0000062750214,0.000040402978,0.00066056335,0.00018586133,0.000093567614,0.9602607,0.032326862,0.00605802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022944248,0.00002384191,0.0027656378,0.0003123042,0.000019832538,0.00010670143,0.0015050909,0.0012279416,0.00030693735,0.40025237,0.59336615,0.00009021679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83752936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92596066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16247064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07600948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19272256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55148995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392669592","doi":"10.7202/1109765ar","title":"Les règles de preuve devant la Chambre de la jeunesse : Une analyse en vertu des principes de justice fondamentale","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028766348811292877,"score_gpt":0.33630023841880774,"score_spread":0.3075338896075149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392669592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60726106,0.04241296,0.008830629,0.023471475,0.0005712994,0.00009407271,0.00064502156,0.00008438834,0.31662905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752892,0.00409279,0.0012362759,0.0003379595,0.00010890558,0.000045724042,0.00011016305,0.000041371863,0.018737447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691737,0.00081757066,0.0001264008,0.0003563682,0.0009914611,0.0007908063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928478,0.0037384105,0.0011606856,0.0004921695,0.001274068,0.0004867318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036186946,0.00037134366,0.0004561261,0.0022379104,0.005219695,0.0074896067,0.0011450164,0.0018101843,0.008259118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013113278,0.00032038838,0.00069203833,0.0024226578,0.008252797,0.004952456,0.0039241337,0.0032060242,0.00069985085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015834994,0.000049255534,0.02781074,0.00026412113,0.00006299002,0.00067900977,0.08360326,0.0010732778,0.0009279693,0.78698874,0.007498191,0.09088408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022721797,0.00025726837,0.33835664,0.0015872163,0.00013236297,0.0015835725,0.11052007,0.0013780094,0.0023393675,0.30310586,0.24051678,0.00020020072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04286772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084948175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04286772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006982656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063382816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08523643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392823229","doi":"10.29173/jaed123","title":"An Overview Of The Gambling Provisions In Canadian Criminal Law And First Nations Gambling","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.10113067130281615,"score_gpt":0.37719241642569107,"score_spread":0.2760617451228749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392823229","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020426333,0.817204,0.0017376357,0.04014856,0.0015557642,0.00020631382,0.0026406546,0.000055458073,0.116025195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11449669,0.8564888,0.004658743,0.007831353,0.0012825589,0.00010247445,0.0019747955,0.000033584267,0.01313091],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951133,0.0005140091,0.00036416008,0.00023610968,0.0025683404,0.0012039773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851008,0.0061007487,0.0007812391,0.00021897262,0.006929033,0.00086921686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052504297,0.0009153656,0.0008427267,0.033220436,0.008294524,0.010034742,0.002362291,0.003718501,0.004496119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010390962,0.0007875399,0.0013990327,0.043476433,0.006422395,0.0039218157,0.0017517479,0.0040783687,0.00025011663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009436776,0.00018360696,0.04269415,0.007752732,0.00016072288,0.0012430917,0.013396819,0.0023005118,0.0006639829,0.3766091,0.14061795,0.41428298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112220605,0.000051489515,0.20361157,0.012824126,0.0002474449,0.00068676256,0.0135784745,0.000888475,0.00031982808,0.024712423,0.7428831,0.00018512011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99433583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10081683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10081683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18696906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7314807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019964","doi":"10.7202/1105761ar","title":"La place des autorités jurisprudentielles, de la doctrine et des faits d’intérêt public dans l’interprétation des lois au Canada : l’ascendance du contexte","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.026926064634788065,"score_gpt":0.33038732473353577,"score_spread":0.3034612600987477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050980482,0.2101202,0.007243111,0.381812,0.0024858415,0.00009062262,0.00086832145,0.00006535337,0.34633416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8391302,0.088097766,0.0043710363,0.02550045,0.00092469464,0.000074074436,0.00023930594,0.00011964492,0.041542746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747967,0.0060397214,0.0006661484,0.002211147,0.0123394225,0.0039468366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96989095,0.011073226,0.0015225883,0.0015793174,0.013487037,0.0024468366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012032578,0.0005545843,0.0010485972,0.006646286,0.022924822,0.02471817,0.0030419438,0.0068140635,0.0051716473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019628812,0.00089982705,0.0005907175,0.007457555,0.06663209,0.009644376,0.0065590087,0.012956976,0.00049001403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031096366,0.000017378856,0.0018336381,0.00046373837,0.000032818512,0.000189044,0.019715236,0.00019078361,0.00028840313,0.9213877,0.026002875,0.029847383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039570208,0.00003083471,0.01640065,0.0027026571,0.000100734236,0.00026121418,0.029903129,0.0003712337,0.00075520744,0.16632774,0.78292716,0.00017988568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95963466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98080325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1548637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1548637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31151748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393281015","doi":"","title":"Procédures dématérialisées : éléments de droit comparé québécois, JCP G 2019, supplément au n° 14, du 8 avr. 2019, p. 56.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Chemistry; Crystallography","score_opus":0.01396933778286938,"score_gpt":0.2481252936427909,"score_spread":0.23415595585992152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393281015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10646585,0.15397017,0.04638037,0.13715342,0.009579909,0.0061069685,0.065850675,0.0014024666,0.47309017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53987527,0.04446681,0.113290414,0.020652264,0.0018363871,0.007252987,0.040986728,0.0015331426,0.230106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94145936,0.015764235,0.0060540834,0.003063476,0.03147003,0.002188816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84778434,0.05757939,0.007624352,0.00810962,0.07640899,0.0024933557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061675783,0.0008541429,0.0012527013,0.014168597,0.0075846245,0.0101506775,0.0027216868,0.0037243068,0.017294323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16199814,0.0008502825,0.0014250326,0.013080803,0.007272035,0.004699443,0.0032340826,0.0042621833,0.0022000605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083406677,0.00023209587,0.019523533,0.0040708506,0.00024113954,0.00034872966,0.02264986,0.0018106633,0.0017351444,0.12804131,0.40870547,0.41180712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078955,0.00017062773,0.11699936,0.00834527,0.00015007895,0.0003166734,0.010250824,0.0008370596,0.0020144952,0.01487666,0.84573585,0.00022409475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88111764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9085412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11888236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08755717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11675274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63527465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404908","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1307","title":"The Moral Foundation of Criminal Defences and the Limits of Constitutional Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10634585772018647,"score_gpt":0.3563337948703247,"score_spread":0.24998793715013823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08682684,0.010655937,0.03553997,0.13134274,0.0005428532,0.00009348623,0.00019260954,0.00012454488,0.7346811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707771,0.0011961326,0.004550274,0.0077685667,0.00030397496,0.00009471482,0.000042813303,0.00004133485,0.015225065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743963,0.003590319,0.00035766626,0.0015346585,0.0043477225,0.0027300648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079984,0.0047327,0.00065694406,0.0010669556,0.00181315,0.0009303757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010655119,0.00038810697,0.0007120323,0.0018692235,0.009458365,0.014248984,0.002462625,0.0075900634,0.0036208148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015779894,0.00053844036,0.0007769983,0.00096017815,0.09045373,0.0068586343,0.005658835,0.012834848,0.00045119366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018094308,0.0000027326803,0.000065990134,0.000005468648,0.000001164147,0.000017891958,0.00059762155,0.00009256364,0.000039239014,0.9977983,0.0004652668,0.00091192435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015290345,0.000009131622,0.00073963817,0.000104570485,0.0000061278406,0.000039866198,0.0007192747,0.0005553128,0.00012543386,0.9598053,0.037855458,0.000024680226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28986484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25080362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28986484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04143647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041259687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5763553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393860008","doi":"10.25071/pc5n3t08","title":"Federalism, Disaster Planning Standards and Canadian Charter Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Management","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Federalism; Environmental planning; Public administration; Political science; Business; Environmental science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05627912969639782,"score_gpt":0.35154815101218717,"score_spread":0.29526902131578936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393860008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00972962,0.0028032733,0.005218852,0.0774028,0.0011463694,0.00012787839,0.00092392525,0.00017665436,0.90247065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6653097,0.0062156073,0.014106728,0.033054277,0.0006266923,0.00027276418,0.0018817892,0.0004034158,0.278129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842179,0.0019315724,0.00050756236,0.0015392342,0.007852628,0.0039511183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825539,0.0032383099,0.0007687417,0.0016812511,0.009188263,0.002569569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009733544,0.0005229561,0.00047688783,0.0019567022,0.022011222,0.016110145,0.0027477187,0.004025775,0.025700606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025259811,0.000575929,0.0005952757,0.004006712,0.017610468,0.0052525564,0.0058990577,0.0071476605,0.0012587928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010643718,0.000013723592,0.0008094013,0.00003531409,0.0000043369414,0.000044726887,0.0030725352,0.00024638436,0.000052773226,0.90379345,0.075920165,0.015996587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022001363,0.00001377162,0.0051081628,0.0003496746,0.000013893564,0.000054180175,0.0027331857,0.00038209415,0.0001409247,0.06779931,0.9233093,0.00007344496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98001057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099989444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099989444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21482283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7254776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393952193","doi":"10.26034/la.cfs.2024.4442","title":"La responsabilisation des auteurs de violence conjugale","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie Forensique et Sécurité","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17103584021702736,"score_gpt":0.4194079442039518,"score_spread":0.24837210398692441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393952193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7766295,0.006330518,0.0037185643,0.025081294,0.0007033043,0.00029631658,0.0005959191,0.000047036763,0.18659759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95771724,0.0027723312,0.0007729118,0.0022363965,0.000050684564,0.000082280865,0.00021466712,0.000016987859,0.03613643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645966,0.0011858029,0.000107004045,0.0003339073,0.00089772575,0.0010158925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943298,0.0007184418,0.00070477364,0.0002781044,0.0019911907,0.0019776323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024638025,0.00044672465,0.0004922893,0.0012819024,0.01273769,0.0039581396,0.0013278775,0.0012235064,0.016429996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006168094,0.00027360817,0.00050940434,0.0014507358,0.0057541137,0.0014479582,0.0038691466,0.002706099,0.00074777246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027710668,0.0004685364,0.4102813,0.0009981887,0.00030064874,0.0022175435,0.28257382,0.0009730268,0.0029445954,0.08930132,0.024378676,0.18528524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034581844,0.00028121262,0.53742546,0.0014967655,0.00015115709,0.0008311298,0.22043589,0.000572872,0.0012145089,0.0066473708,0.23074244,0.00016671613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93317723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96789503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93317723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032657042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055202954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23694456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394701392","doi":"10.25071/9v6azb17","title":"How Canada’s highest court has given security certificates a red light","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03355916607115146,"score_gpt":0.24777549978702318,"score_spread":0.21421633371587173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394701392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088067755,0.0037450956,0.0009872353,0.61298996,0.0043651937,0.00009787015,0.001461436,0.00017889169,0.28810665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6744513,0.0026005486,0.001061425,0.11265425,0.0006077243,0.000038545346,0.00056869764,0.0002189114,0.20779862],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98508596,0.0014580654,0.0003260335,0.0009555244,0.0064232415,0.005751201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651954,0.0038324078,0.0006949535,0.00063434115,0.02006105,0.009581742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007729465,0.00030841038,0.00052353484,0.003046443,0.033887003,0.020937724,0.0025981388,0.009327674,0.020389492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0380846,0.00079164054,0.0010213606,0.003002511,0.006612116,0.003877722,0.0034058383,0.013434751,0.0016002259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009222264,0.000079819496,0.023176618,0.00010779574,0.0001193807,0.0006266428,0.008372502,0.0005199081,0.00038368133,0.12554348,0.79329735,0.047680542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047681457,0.00003695235,0.04416624,0.00035306596,0.00018872325,0.00018436326,0.02247919,0.00048844714,0.0008059578,0.010850308,0.92017883,0.00022018811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99431604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14925888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14925888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26316577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867391},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4394725099","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae006","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Kingdom; Public administration","score_opus":0.12789518429323685,"score_gpt":0.3925559634415649,"score_spread":0.2646607791483281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394725099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11851185,0.020957762,0.03483156,0.14417115,0.0006505638,0.00026671495,0.00009291949,0.00008115696,0.6804363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849235,0.0016789194,0.0035303663,0.005138081,0.00011734351,0.000058218033,0.000012683981,0.000021189693,0.0045197913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9340182,0.034408826,0.002481971,0.0027311265,0.02034602,0.0060138498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.897786,0.06758398,0.0035720484,0.0030653893,0.023698824,0.0042937114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03975221,0.00032515483,0.0009749927,0.0056674923,0.015326477,0.019906836,0.0018959768,0.0075287484,0.001990635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09918703,0.0006224369,0.00059717515,0.0040090308,0.06868989,0.005965529,0.006380066,0.0075419145,0.00020645378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073294846,0.000005111118,0.0003030612,0.000017380942,0.000007209303,0.00006594479,0.0036525337,0.00047909812,0.000045751385,0.992098,0.0012019443,0.002116589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033648594,0.000020443815,0.0036001916,0.00053851184,0.000054324133,0.00008958304,0.0057957545,0.0032049285,0.00029407567,0.9489165,0.037322354,0.00012966487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7559122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7471816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084081955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084650025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6100601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394730524","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4752500","title":"Ontario Evidence Act Handbook with Common Objections &amp;amp; Evidentiary Foundations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.055767952584011335,"score_gpt":0.36135746298171856,"score_spread":0.3055895103977072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394730524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069802103,0.014056583,0.0057180165,0.037815794,0.002162152,0.00094635907,0.013197352,0.0008149579,0.9245907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013633888,0.016239338,0.015586859,0.009824904,0.00096788985,0.000981631,0.006657725,0.0006896814,0.9354181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701075,0.0027742267,0.0021675106,0.0010617678,0.022235673,0.0016532349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93708295,0.01278332,0.0026526987,0.0040391157,0.04093365,0.0025082096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016789488,0.0011650731,0.001247814,0.012497305,0.0092874905,0.0138416765,0.0062020915,0.009782227,0.116228156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05678876,0.0024996758,0.0010033973,0.01280391,0.0074357735,0.0053247726,0.0035322357,0.006115343,0.038375273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010700673,0.00001909028,0.00025381517,0.00020781308,0.0000038882545,0.00005595785,0.00026275797,0.00014466933,0.00004381238,0.07318503,0.9016971,0.024115449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051945017,0.0000036949791,0.0007843999,0.00037536645,0.0000060321267,0.000038373422,0.00012404493,0.00007751867,0.00005661908,0.006305638,0.99220455,0.000018494888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8572743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93197733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8572743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062214788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2288545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.451402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394909283","doi":"10.4337/9781802206678.00024","title":"Deferred prosecutions and justice: a whodunnit?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05578548030368578,"score_gpt":0.31534922111750896,"score_spread":0.25956374081382316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394909283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047077294,0.044537522,0.00036603236,0.9386354,0.0066775624,0.0000036553383,0.000012554405,0.000014956117,0.009281445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05696597,0.06798815,0.00071843853,0.8198316,0.03740539,0.000044204873,0.00004218835,0.00013908441,0.0168649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98253584,0.0070469826,0.0008932343,0.0023218656,0.004033649,0.0031684972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9499069,0.03131717,0.0023880596,0.0024646425,0.006865508,0.0070577245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019028798,0.00084664114,0.0016848969,0.002519554,0.014611056,0.025967462,0.003962197,0.029141532,0.017523745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05066863,0.0007843359,0.0007826098,0.0022351758,0.052895565,0.047457624,0.011891136,0.038942453,0.0031898268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035196674,0.000059850438,0.0006389845,0.00027933062,0.000016446302,0.00028481017,0.0070460346,0.000041687927,0.000041808165,0.44258195,0.46841425,0.08055967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002972052,0.00005270005,0.0010886551,0.002689187,0.000016842774,0.0005785659,0.014995809,0.00014458934,0.000057334313,0.2991845,0.6810886,0.00007351719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023331618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039250504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029141532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012703042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018311132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10063511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914617","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.8294","title":"Safety in Numbers or Lost in the Crowd? Litigation of Mass Claims and Access to Justice in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.11137195080881866,"score_gpt":0.3938040363502775,"score_spread":0.2824320855414588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28684708,0.015129811,0.0019346937,0.13334662,0.0006275905,0.00019877062,0.0005350101,0.000056527224,0.56132394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88066757,0.008969492,0.00097355986,0.007912522,0.00017212958,0.00006448258,0.00013614025,0.00003344856,0.10107062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948132,0.000514158,0.0002382739,0.0002438537,0.0027927614,0.001397735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921943,0.0034213725,0.00090341206,0.0002619301,0.0017175053,0.0015014833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032122992,0.0001995344,0.00034526605,0.0017063421,0.022087706,0.008081951,0.0018697813,0.0031589787,0.007999921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178942,0.00037055966,0.00029689423,0.002779574,0.01147667,0.002903304,0.0043754326,0.0025024156,0.0004391569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821703,0.000097396325,0.032033585,0.00058963295,0.000037982798,0.003938013,0.16022602,0.00078637403,0.0008754117,0.5231355,0.17127417,0.10691776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034900422,0.00007977884,0.08343024,0.0012848692,0.000072018796,0.00091802125,0.12133791,0.00095508323,0.0006755353,0.044515528,0.7465404,0.00015568869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9765513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99383247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111481816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111481816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13203229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80886096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031020","doi":"10.29173/alr2735","title":"Remedying Unreasonable Delay","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07072834924317896,"score_gpt":0.37511198147496916,"score_spread":0.3043836322317902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18199942,0.008095596,0.08092156,0.055164278,0.0023886964,0.0006543218,0.00037016848,0.000937388,0.66946864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88831717,0.0021410675,0.012441657,0.027271243,0.000630642,0.00023663908,0.000105731575,0.00013202602,0.06872395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554707,0.0017103305,0.000981165,0.0027217478,0.0058696168,0.003170136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875882,0.006108185,0.0013193232,0.0017165685,0.002393777,0.00087393506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009877733,0.0006069394,0.00070138526,0.0011896074,0.0046230885,0.0047203247,0.0035822357,0.011119528,0.0072348327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027994541,0.00055843283,0.0011315494,0.0006154229,0.0069862143,0.0045228787,0.004817766,0.011028243,0.0011610703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006827753,0.00008751839,0.0021565517,0.00017196266,0.00005158427,0.0017289438,0.0024856909,0.0013523867,0.003748867,0.94880277,0.014144912,0.025200544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022347902,0.0009974418,0.0064073107,0.0011465693,0.00030617462,0.004175554,0.003943778,0.0064197825,0.011876633,0.5011483,0.46304867,0.00030629156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02301609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03646543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02301609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064150714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01762023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05223906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031095","doi":"10.29173/alr2741","title":"Uncertainty Over the Scope of Borrower Protections in Mortgage Enforcement Proceedings in Alberta: The Problems and Potential Solutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Mortgage underwriting; Finance; Economics; Law; Mortgage insurance; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04525285719647719,"score_gpt":0.3206136954996343,"score_spread":0.2753608383031571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35612506,0.0991438,0.013911721,0.35078686,0.00070353557,0.00029305974,0.0010518484,0.00011644317,0.17786765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677555,0.0141185615,0.0026170968,0.010932612,0.00028275308,0.00005281301,0.00015191657,0.000015011897,0.00407373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548291,0.011626514,0.0024977757,0.004078129,0.021443715,0.0055247876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8479139,0.10541271,0.015877074,0.0034624452,0.022928895,0.0044049053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057937607,0.00030934182,0.00125419,0.008119247,0.009523592,0.015458197,0.006087522,0.0057476494,0.0034661682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107815,0.00090340595,0.00057054707,0.008227436,0.021930385,0.0067793187,0.0068703145,0.0066361795,0.00019547535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021764658,0.00014150498,0.11731559,0.001558882,0.00031665157,0.0025830688,0.03899643,0.007029026,0.00066388276,0.5539852,0.025593912,0.2515982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011241241,0.00013625699,0.34824556,0.010525696,0.0004233892,0.0012838958,0.097991616,0.0054184664,0.0010673277,0.36695156,0.1672888,0.0005550976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8230651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1769349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08620813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.111349545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031097","doi":"10.29173/alr2733","title":"Freedom of Expression: Values and Harms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.05570262532108206,"score_gpt":0.36446524926745744,"score_spread":0.3087626239463754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048301328,0.00480315,0.031335935,0.07978997,0.00072147953,0.00011628341,0.000090376285,0.00008394988,0.8347576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94133407,0.0018297908,0.003542852,0.0146559,0.00042378312,0.00020310079,0.000059546328,0.00011030315,0.037840657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9561809,0.017883843,0.0014562777,0.003101965,0.01686346,0.004513569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97695017,0.012908722,0.0014163477,0.00427545,0.003359137,0.0010901954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02364386,0.00087585486,0.0010137936,0.0020637773,0.015230173,0.015635941,0.002684711,0.009585561,0.0038111433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033968017,0.0005487109,0.00089822436,0.0017554491,0.11109495,0.012145304,0.015233542,0.014015074,0.0007097428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006806373,0.000008349083,0.000292746,0.000015293703,0.000004117253,0.000074430245,0.005587401,0.00011241323,0.00007667752,0.9869261,0.001638577,0.005257088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016029247,0.00002349205,0.0006818488,0.00036143264,0.000015965583,0.00031920176,0.008220574,0.0004293077,0.000572362,0.8889006,0.10041733,0.000041904113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04645162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036754083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04645162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016017765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018226184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1250422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031192","doi":"10.29173/alr2745","title":"The Lost Art of the Plea Inquiry: Learning From the Past to Prevent Wrongful Convictions in the Future","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.04786598903364865,"score_gpt":0.34312357015872513,"score_spread":0.2952575811250765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07353049,0.014509422,0.21172665,0.4845879,0.0020959165,0.00038053474,0.00023800711,0.0011169732,0.21181408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86579806,0.009554553,0.065555915,0.030350238,0.0012709236,0.00043900503,0.00025620888,0.0002974661,0.026477654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876139,0.00601678,0.0005708088,0.0011690041,0.003303974,0.0013255829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392486,0.036470342,0.005374024,0.00745116,0.007025079,0.0044308016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025451252,0.00065256143,0.00069643307,0.0018310761,0.008382363,0.008873539,0.0029629723,0.0065535894,0.010400783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106034294,0.0008524797,0.0007879373,0.0007313835,0.012549227,0.023614978,0.008818345,0.013738101,0.0030026766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020532496,0.0007493169,0.015478598,0.00046860785,0.00004982597,0.0016292093,0.015415397,0.0038435005,0.000990458,0.41456115,0.109655745,0.43695292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010139729,0.00038604916,0.0102117555,0.0035860103,0.000112507914,0.00189338,0.011688825,0.011865628,0.0029436764,0.6392999,0.31765392,0.00025697675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00839938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018592052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025451252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055973013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018216131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1346007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395058869","doi":"10.29173/alr2738","title":"Equitable Crime and Constructive Punishment: Deemed and Actual Agency Gains in Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Constructive; Law; Criminology; Constructive trust; Criminal law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.058821821623517324,"score_gpt":0.3603355605315148,"score_spread":0.30151373890799743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395058869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18870485,0.01401813,0.004437887,0.05004748,0.0003484525,0.00017410258,0.00027259366,0.000033127602,0.74196345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98220223,0.0040580183,0.0009080818,0.0025620586,0.000042809046,0.000030178468,0.000044319895,0.000013707539,0.010138604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394126,0.0024923806,0.00043413724,0.0010004052,0.008399912,0.0037318475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98177564,0.0072749467,0.0017035175,0.00096413825,0.0069659417,0.0013159056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071529304,0.00042186896,0.00066852616,0.005416368,0.014778484,0.011716568,0.0024634944,0.0036143435,0.006023773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03565672,0.00048968225,0.00048165038,0.005377386,0.03730593,0.004679845,0.00525625,0.0051037804,0.00019211353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027594457,0.000030692794,0.004433943,0.000121638135,0.000018074536,0.00024247197,0.008864626,0.00046979586,0.00010761732,0.96254086,0.0057866178,0.017356062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015911442,0.000120638986,0.13215007,0.0025754524,0.0002578169,0.0007748656,0.0561559,0.004186867,0.001387312,0.5386195,0.2632217,0.0003907417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1148162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1148162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15424217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83305377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059436","doi":"10.29173/alr2687","title":"Reflections on COVID-19 And Criminal Law: How Does Judicial Doctrine Function in A Crisis?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Function (biology); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Economics; Medicine; Virology; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.09382345835857536,"score_gpt":0.41422065767767263,"score_spread":0.32039719931909727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059436","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072623957,0.04552743,0.0024145353,0.9043278,0.0017866702,0.000012680559,0.000020768,0.000016616537,0.038631182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63571554,0.05974297,0.0037517124,0.28109676,0.0062855994,0.00006822156,0.000058285532,0.00011783347,0.01316305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98475164,0.007134931,0.000517009,0.0010198449,0.0040100613,0.0025665099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96409446,0.0273937,0.0014803086,0.0010178946,0.0043645543,0.0016491389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028957974,0.00038144825,0.0010687144,0.0026711584,0.009819201,0.019093206,0.0029039711,0.015851036,0.00442141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03996042,0.000563598,0.00074663956,0.0028913608,0.0935981,0.02216813,0.0073534,0.031514753,0.000722426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086380805,0.000010475658,0.0002432501,0.00004639398,0.000004261947,0.00011781735,0.003083987,0.00017622566,0.00005147746,0.97033596,0.016175048,0.009746318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019249881,0.000035310117,0.00149035,0.00087441783,0.000006982572,0.00017063471,0.016977157,0.00027807828,0.00017448823,0.69434774,0.2855608,0.00006486447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06435649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064845055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06435649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024683772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024842849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17909414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059440","doi":"10.29173/alr2692","title":"The Dawn of Vavilov, The Twilight of Doré: Remedial Paths in Judicial Review of Rights-Affecting Administrative Decisions and The Unification of Canadian Public Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Remedial education; Twilight; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Judicial review; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07461095937881579,"score_gpt":0.350044930785816,"score_spread":0.2754339714070002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059440","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030938214,0.036059655,0.018343724,0.6774482,0.0023413969,0.00017339595,0.00023200782,0.00017416873,0.2342892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8219198,0.014066043,0.014462828,0.087418936,0.0011048004,0.00012692729,0.00009109255,0.0001911394,0.060618326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978131,0.005004334,0.0006390528,0.003013325,0.009591929,0.003620296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96710837,0.017262172,0.0013757884,0.0019336769,0.010003176,0.0023168423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02287325,0.0004590928,0.00071025535,0.0030983842,0.01935342,0.020295328,0.002990839,0.010708342,0.0062490595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062360615,0.00073562196,0.00070905685,0.0024294436,0.04075892,0.011280859,0.0049716225,0.011479701,0.0005751235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316925,0.000012486181,0.0006440641,0.00007565761,0.000013352453,0.00010513601,0.004781832,0.0005064488,0.00017597433,0.9394953,0.03157734,0.0225807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011013435,0.00004815269,0.004904769,0.0008415725,0.000084287974,0.00012204092,0.006945726,0.002489433,0.0012866791,0.5033834,0.47956118,0.00022268426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8955479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93732834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112093195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112093195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1698257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81329685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395078647","doi":"10.1163/9789004535091_039","title":"Montreal Universal Declaration on the Independence of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Independence (probability theory); Economic Justice; Political science; Declaration of independence; Law; Mathematics; Statistics; Politics","score_opus":0.07025357894546123,"score_gpt":0.3069955011116634,"score_spread":0.23674192216620216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395078647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008730266,0.018810218,0.0018128692,0.03691214,0.006731388,0.0001999127,0.0026920738,0.00021168479,0.9317567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019760717,0.004528638,0.002477294,0.028981524,0.0012295241,0.00031080513,0.0004748765,0.0001759967,0.94206065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951557,0.0007239341,0.00016044133,0.00056464766,0.0022053288,0.0011900297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784243,0.00057089946,0.00011769997,0.0002308021,0.00093153503,0.00030664384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038726141,0.0014084881,0.0010522853,0.0024312725,0.008502829,0.0074530165,0.0034541998,0.012086616,0.03328405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008343689,0.0014664284,0.0009809948,0.00223293,0.006633891,0.0025646274,0.0031347536,0.013749573,0.0057962746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017425582,0.000016284039,0.00012378673,0.0000614057,0.000009367159,0.000053019292,0.00036384328,0.00013345126,0.000083326304,0.44211963,0.5479745,0.009043873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012687077,0.0000052580326,0.0010055269,0.00015645182,0.000009276701,0.000032235657,0.000094170704,0.00007338548,0.00013138715,0.020936955,0.977514,0.000028628367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81934994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8818137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18065006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03241271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06605197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36342782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395095264","doi":"10.5040/9781509970483.ch-010","title":"A Field Trip into Québec Law: Exploring the Theoretical Ramifications of Sentience Recognition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentience; Field (mathematics); Law; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08637490120057668,"score_gpt":0.34898034250987725,"score_spread":0.2626054413093006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395095264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25514117,0.006263741,0.0030721002,0.109179914,0.0007173053,0.00017417606,0.0027648716,0.00008956313,0.62259716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87197936,0.0027456733,0.00097030366,0.006047698,0.00009322037,0.00006346864,0.00037434054,0.000056829205,0.117669106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902296,0.0003905685,0.000010038499,0.000075204785,0.0001600756,0.00034120385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524325,0.0016917123,0.00019863265,0.00018076983,0.0017471449,0.000938536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018465713,0.00033432545,0.0002778823,0.0022002147,0.017197168,0.007562056,0.0014590994,0.0028140938,0.040208858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063293236,0.00018118229,0.0002821298,0.003718851,0.0060836053,0.004229304,0.0023613742,0.0037430676,0.001282915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001610882,0.00019151547,0.03735107,0.00020507674,0.000036029982,0.0012567362,0.07626234,0.001146293,0.0004513498,0.48152387,0.2676853,0.13372935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003800387,0.00013248167,0.12362056,0.0010387936,0.000040330095,0.00039056144,0.34112266,0.003913657,0.0004620983,0.06082248,0.46830967,0.00010867485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97925925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99299026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94456303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055436958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04866744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40222514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395461938","doi":"10.1515/9782763731483-007","title":"L’obligation de faire adopter la version française des textes constitutionnels canadiens","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.0503902051621805,"score_gpt":0.2977136727258381,"score_spread":0.24732346756365758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395461938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010917447,0.022213055,0.016079579,0.3227554,0.022834001,0.00013747068,0.00037100844,0.00040926726,0.60428274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23907444,0.010807401,0.01960197,0.077715896,0.0085445205,0.0004948274,0.00046127956,0.0010202263,0.6422794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9585875,0.01613338,0.002524636,0.0036205857,0.015124049,0.0040097903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524887,0.024423776,0.00200988,0.006476468,0.013382638,0.0012185646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03299102,0.001011873,0.0012179769,0.003041867,0.009640223,0.022329377,0.0027302527,0.018290477,0.013661963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06353907,0.0011131396,0.0013054954,0.002093148,0.016720336,0.01320686,0.005346871,0.023037381,0.0063869287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021440314,0.00002058056,0.00015620528,0.00006624968,0.000017402615,0.00010410925,0.0037929513,0.0001145016,0.00034263765,0.9061505,0.07253912,0.016674155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018260223,0.000016198333,0.000418959,0.00028241274,0.000015421308,0.00020808486,0.00087538175,0.00017638672,0.00044887728,0.056741174,0.94075364,0.000045084496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08776305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049628835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9122369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016682755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02264198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1745044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395473776","doi":"10.1515/9782763731483-011","title":"Rapport définitif du comité de rédaction constitutionnelle française chargé, en 1984, d’établir un projet de version française officielle de certains textes constitutionnels à l’intention du ministre de la Justice du Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02160101134844848,"score_gpt":0.25937976487646236,"score_spread":0.23777875352801386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395473776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019034268,0.010628307,0.0065595633,0.024692602,0.0028743003,0.00057731697,0.001342831,0.00012543729,0.9341653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1817126,0.007148429,0.010791614,0.0059225266,0.0004532446,0.00068638305,0.0013186184,0.00023198024,0.79173464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914691,0.0015723082,0.0004414417,0.0010495894,0.0041428166,0.0013247627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99070084,0.0026459785,0.00035315292,0.00046401334,0.0051951343,0.00064085674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008309418,0.00058548857,0.00037274515,0.003973485,0.009371516,0.0088032205,0.0013759735,0.0032232455,0.0132303145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00974708,0.00063257536,0.0005243481,0.0033188283,0.0083896555,0.003429467,0.002668836,0.005204549,0.0017159219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005758197,0.000051659772,0.0014226966,0.00019632305,0.000012326663,0.00032097552,0.01886315,0.00023965388,0.00095752056,0.7611151,0.15439296,0.062370054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011124466,0.000014054263,0.002990444,0.00024809781,0.0000067126584,0.00008511349,0.0021272905,0.000051356616,0.00067380385,0.00437524,0.9893925,0.000024243513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69779277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7625498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30220723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05613763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08712565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60797393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395661108","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4808628","title":"Local Reform or Legal Transplant: Ontario’s Amended Certification Test","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Test (biology); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02970750760028566,"score_gpt":0.3072226517016559,"score_spread":0.27751514410137024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395661108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22823791,0.0007249072,0.0038328907,0.05857724,0.00088389165,0.0009730452,0.004171537,0.00016754857,0.7024311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9310089,0.00020831193,0.002245588,0.011658176,0.0001947424,0.00032114147,0.000889113,0.000050976545,0.053423084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97880954,0.0020927715,0.0010477373,0.0023899109,0.010030959,0.005629206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382376,0.022512075,0.0038683973,0.0056000818,0.02458071,0.005201045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014912352,0.0003442944,0.0009600583,0.002453414,0.008493744,0.0045727678,0.0037411547,0.006067768,0.026081644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10063525,0.00044568913,0.0011157751,0.0029372564,0.007629332,0.0042633433,0.0033840358,0.0037982662,0.001690297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010661108,0.00039474966,0.17757754,0.0004257261,0.0002918802,0.0011989465,0.007465419,0.0018792447,0.0010817436,0.45746705,0.27624524,0.074906364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013315902,0.0005619021,0.46888304,0.00092035084,0.0012653448,0.00064279034,0.018194316,0.0073022875,0.0030709698,0.07980173,0.4176051,0.0004206514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90395135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9569755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09604865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031298023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10894245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22708416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396501616","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4809755","title":"Truth and Reconciliation: why Canada should repeal s. 43 of the Criminal Code","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.034343851111677676,"score_gpt":0.3046922529303892,"score_spread":0.27034840181871156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396501616","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03297113,0.0023007516,0.0011699975,0.78224593,0.0018101775,0.00012749934,0.00042262487,0.000100344776,0.1788516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52031326,0.0014470543,0.002773665,0.3995798,0.0009164912,0.000116653086,0.00020141935,0.0002291877,0.074422546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681921,0.005963194,0.00093806605,0.0024037722,0.01000889,0.012493992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.926792,0.026047094,0.0023999878,0.0024842466,0.03207099,0.010205582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02319376,0.00046078663,0.0008562347,0.0021332086,0.033304017,0.01493714,0.0046318257,0.032697413,0.017972369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10781202,0.0010716282,0.0011628346,0.0024788799,0.017208591,0.006367084,0.005746758,0.03052896,0.0016116219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012081812,0.00008673022,0.008120938,0.00011601448,0.00006906795,0.0004243504,0.007896436,0.0006805297,0.00031293934,0.4632296,0.482593,0.036349542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033811547,0.00014148478,0.033721123,0.0012000435,0.00037182844,0.00030907406,0.021949457,0.00278853,0.001636234,0.1643167,0.7727653,0.00046220506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07506076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07506076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36425596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5446065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396542125","doi":"10.1515/9782760636002","title":"La détention avant jugement au Canada","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018755042048181805,"score_gpt":0.2240351820072148,"score_spread":0.205280139959033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396542125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09548807,0.043325253,0.0020011426,0.12149532,0.0055881543,0.00021056233,0.0014115317,0.00023333992,0.7302466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19668478,0.011054122,0.0005467325,0.008247254,0.00027274402,0.00004389059,0.00029951558,0.00006561788,0.78278536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975344,0.00013627268,0.00004575231,0.00013143853,0.00081544387,0.0013366999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982686,0.0002755251,0.000061812825,0.000041073854,0.00085281645,0.000500214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088139874,0.0005070505,0.0005109025,0.0010320108,0.01581903,0.003989297,0.0018840965,0.0038873355,0.012897731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044068256,0.0005188351,0.00046295955,0.0018280483,0.0034035053,0.00075253163,0.0020133522,0.0053610965,0.0013866766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009598611,0.000097299075,0.008854582,0.00027305173,0.00004894666,0.0017394022,0.013742959,0.0019835972,0.00082885026,0.21554697,0.5639258,0.19286254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024161835,0.000049961935,0.02440853,0.00045610257,0.000033147262,0.00034560575,0.009458343,0.0006885715,0.00037889136,0.005294923,0.9587823,0.00007954528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05245845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05245845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21014664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38061446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686519","doi":"10.29173/mlj1117","title":"The Problematically Low Threshold of Evidence in Canadian Extradition Law: An Inquiry into its Origins; and Repercussions in the Case of Hassan Diab","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14763968215421863,"score_gpt":0.36994081375479765,"score_spread":0.22230113160057902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686519","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13128124,0.007573375,0.004242398,0.73872125,0.00088182994,0.00021416864,0.0003031042,0.000040999807,0.11674164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256875,0.002723033,0.004056553,0.058665395,0.0002581233,0.00008607955,0.00005949991,0.000052805877,0.008410978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9444206,0.009858615,0.0033438718,0.004028455,0.026486661,0.011861789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7958674,0.10005892,0.007155933,0.004818642,0.07292567,0.019173415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05884621,0.0005478066,0.0013989167,0.008719311,0.058821496,0.027256973,0.008943655,0.020560132,0.0036764087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17212428,0.0016885663,0.001292687,0.01113717,0.06166952,0.008372927,0.014669636,0.031313654,0.00018722404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045359666,0.000043574688,0.017362764,0.00023594001,0.000085509695,0.0031992127,0.06399393,0.000569215,0.0005291501,0.8674835,0.027459716,0.018992156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020779647,0.000073985284,0.059451066,0.0037592342,0.00062920124,0.0033004433,0.23696932,0.004202613,0.002247944,0.39677802,0.29118094,0.0011994134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99107707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19536036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19536036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38954815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93326795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686663","doi":"10.29173/mlj1251","title":"Chapter 13 – The Dangers of Charter-Proofing the Toronto 18’s Prosecution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.057905607585483715,"score_gpt":0.31239602280322304,"score_spread":0.2544904152177393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02255626,0.020964544,0.005914455,0.09511316,0.0045537516,0.00034207248,0.00033177037,0.00026329028,0.8499606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30010605,0.014702228,0.0061065806,0.07038146,0.0023635954,0.00029602944,0.0002625839,0.0002943056,0.60548717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082667,0.0010348583,0.00028255777,0.00068378367,0.0057556424,0.0014164809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290246,0.0027669468,0.00037930967,0.00038144866,0.0031019263,0.00046787484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051869685,0.00047137312,0.00029394397,0.0011393602,0.014172118,0.013141781,0.0024003328,0.0077827997,0.009667157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009668714,0.00056189415,0.000546069,0.0010028057,0.007906741,0.0027800126,0.0022376804,0.009799883,0.0022631665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014880281,0.000023751152,0.0010724082,0.00013825632,0.000012562221,0.00071288465,0.012290355,0.0006791658,0.00075950683,0.6641652,0.28963888,0.030492168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005578938,0.000030302364,0.0018713765,0.0005906242,0.000014355698,0.0002722694,0.0043156664,0.00038843811,0.0009534167,0.016306326,0.97520036,0.000051292198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52650815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64500993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47349185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031943295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038781658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95256066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686678","doi":"10.29173/mlj1245","title":"Chapter 7 – Curing Complexity: Moving Forward from the Toronto 18 on Intelligence-to-Evidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Warrant; Law; Intelligence analysis; Government (linguistics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.2013073444227001,"score_gpt":0.369750869727238,"score_spread":0.16844352530453788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011693156,0.031633124,0.031147998,0.36394975,0.0031217071,0.00023370572,0.00031063904,0.00030193018,0.55760795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5036072,0.0492241,0.04010181,0.11277525,0.0046484303,0.00043723173,0.00039018717,0.00068289967,0.2881329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570967,0.0031443094,0.00049481203,0.0012695094,0.0073569906,0.002024626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98652714,0.0062077944,0.000497233,0.0012794953,0.003939426,0.0015488582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00896682,0.0009735882,0.0008247996,0.002350862,0.012664693,0.018935258,0.0032455546,0.009548917,0.0147877345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014477839,0.0008622089,0.0009047747,0.0018188588,0.048049584,0.011972859,0.007450686,0.01742943,0.0020463031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000562603,0.0000046336586,0.00018137033,0.000051616207,0.000003143949,0.0000684107,0.0022562286,0.00020576468,0.000116318486,0.9632545,0.025030963,0.008821458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009297482,0.000022311267,0.0009675139,0.00084652007,0.000015026593,0.00011768715,0.0035228238,0.0005371665,0.000473366,0.19276854,0.80067396,0.000045847515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7359492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79572314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26405078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08858547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1043509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6427356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686707","doi":"10.29173/mlj1252","title":"Chapter 14 – Sentencing the Toronto 18: Lessons from Then, Lessons for Now","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Terrorism; Culpability; Harm; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sentencing guidelines; Sentence; Law; Criminology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.11957844813978605,"score_gpt":0.3684143606725446,"score_spread":0.24883591253275858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031083414,0.056896254,0.0063369023,0.57645524,0.009041571,0.00017421006,0.0006277342,0.00030104947,0.31908354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56423193,0.061537348,0.010330251,0.07420581,0.003614355,0.00019020283,0.0009496746,0.00032489526,0.2846155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916391,0.002292472,0.00029851377,0.0006519593,0.0036726317,0.0014453883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99032074,0.002653418,0.00025550945,0.0005105839,0.0046298853,0.0016298627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008461275,0.00054840423,0.00041276388,0.0007673531,0.011954196,0.011101536,0.0026861262,0.004838322,0.011888363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017546041,0.00055379147,0.00054995413,0.0009652117,0.0081252735,0.0059653986,0.0031354108,0.013880648,0.0024825246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113385046,0.00007623819,0.0026790048,0.00071508077,0.00003553773,0.0013493904,0.037376158,0.0016472484,0.0009022897,0.32816923,0.44524434,0.18169205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014744285,0.000059284244,0.006831581,0.0015427613,0.000027113174,0.0003545237,0.025312023,0.00039631815,0.00071100367,0.022411704,0.9422419,0.00009705426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84846157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93407416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15153843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06372775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08470964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46237934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686732","doi":"10.29173/mlj1248","title":"Chapter 10 – Trial by Jury and the Toronto 18","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Terrorism; SWORD; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04234916095598757,"score_gpt":0.31460750203745547,"score_spread":0.2722583410814679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120635,0.09650164,0.0031847912,0.08724524,0.004425984,0.00031651658,0.0003793026,0.000056744724,0.7958263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39223439,0.10617877,0.004670106,0.04413969,0.0060767606,0.00082859216,0.00058407034,0.00017256741,0.445115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990351,0.0029949262,0.00043541248,0.00074897544,0.0041127135,0.0013570078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920001,0.004548907,0.0006723525,0.00034539867,0.0016485405,0.00078471366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005321455,0.00037148566,0.0004993125,0.0014986271,0.00810362,0.008450112,0.001841084,0.0049850247,0.022666331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016966077,0.0005093771,0.0004965504,0.0020134863,0.010315387,0.003373302,0.0037286226,0.006461031,0.0025947664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080485224,0.00003136994,0.0016216931,0.00036058578,0.00001763528,0.00036972426,0.004759984,0.0005183418,0.0001805949,0.73788416,0.2063276,0.047847778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004613581,0.00009035625,0.00589877,0.0016451314,0.000025250052,0.00026385282,0.0034350208,0.00031564175,0.00033045112,0.036840945,0.95105875,0.000049751347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40052062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60551995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5994794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04042771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04701674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7963787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396713418","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4818633","title":"Cisg Ratification in Hong Kong – a Closer Look at Conformity of Goods Under the Cisg: Third-Party Rights, Claims and Assertions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Conformity; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021757651267767675,"score_gpt":0.32028410846032435,"score_spread":0.29852645719255666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396713418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764796,0.00022624135,0.000105324136,0.0007427123,0.000022162616,0.000029876972,0.000118169446,0.0000033492533,0.02227266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899339,0.00012280825,0.00008310059,0.00014241402,0.000004779842,0.0000098934615,0.000071537914,0.000003301803,0.009628209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970066,0.00071474153,0.00026120536,0.00024966805,0.0005343443,0.001233372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916665,0.0029947744,0.0016742175,0.00063717715,0.0022294808,0.0007979225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054756147,0.00015048072,0.00039494198,0.0018015698,0.0036689306,0.005140974,0.00082015013,0.0009241747,0.0051037655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073952186,0.00035204674,0.0003843974,0.00322546,0.0034876326,0.0017058264,0.001928552,0.0018953425,0.00032957378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006298945,0.00032803754,0.73903054,0.00029609984,0.00017809027,0.0071405843,0.09939465,0.0019296161,0.0020564669,0.11001594,0.006714756,0.032285266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025527714,0.000231197,0.86368626,0.00015728781,0.00006660804,0.00026425644,0.10420016,0.0016071678,0.0012345025,0.0021833917,0.02627065,0.00007306649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66431373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66472465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66431373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015325325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015502468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67532635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714839","doi":"10.29173/mlj1347","title":"Part B Drawing the Curtains in the House of Justice: Analyzing the Impact of Pandemic Measures within Manitoba Courts on the Open Court Principle, Access to Justice, and Charter Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Pandemic; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.1580360929708698,"score_gpt":0.418078896647061,"score_spread":0.2600428036761912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66430867,0.0035218669,0.0029420406,0.10742252,0.00052406447,0.001325964,0.002213854,0.00002655406,0.21771443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392561,0.0018169762,0.001959714,0.02209178,0.00019373633,0.00047722505,0.00032396635,0.00001922678,0.033861257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431264,0.0014200343,0.00014102436,0.00040272,0.0013759021,0.0023476854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98743874,0.006458841,0.0018994154,0.00034039107,0.0022506,0.0016119322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040323455,0.00045276273,0.0006368179,0.002016648,0.011275814,0.008624941,0.002537961,0.006229426,0.01019664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019519854,0.00056412333,0.0009677911,0.004242933,0.0075598126,0.0030422574,0.0038169788,0.007051652,0.00042795035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023852973,0.00075099274,0.11748169,0.00027799114,0.0003714866,0.0032368563,0.032820866,0.012252438,0.0023038725,0.70306486,0.086121954,0.04107851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022126378,0.00063415203,0.50813425,0.0014957022,0.0007078409,0.0003609694,0.17782937,0.009595328,0.0032048018,0.13329224,0.16422129,0.00030279523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8236898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92115676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17631018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046070624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08559799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.354697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715350","doi":"10.29173/mlj1303","title":"Predictive Policing and the Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023026530596553605,"score_gpt":0.2785940423774501,"score_spread":0.2555675117808965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715350","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094522454,0.004250244,0.69719726,0.08169873,0.001104245,0.000327028,0.0007586028,0.0017708217,0.1183706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9113711,0.0012789159,0.07921659,0.0018360124,0.0004794686,0.00011537102,0.00024929506,0.00009422516,0.0053590406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875131,0.006287418,0.00035555958,0.0014907646,0.003667784,0.00068533455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563736,0.027752938,0.00516551,0.004816966,0.0051240725,0.00076687307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01659745,0.00075796584,0.0006817007,0.0037628154,0.002308792,0.007126046,0.0025502208,0.002766284,0.0028672486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07260703,0.0005250984,0.0006606461,0.002550478,0.012938669,0.008153873,0.0027078923,0.0045892433,0.00056025427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007927725,0.000046406087,0.013505516,0.000069145986,0.000031240546,0.00011467305,0.00089099765,0.042651888,0.00012700573,0.8424129,0.007824637,0.092246234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036773614,0.00010710222,0.004800524,0.00031465272,0.00002508159,0.0001628852,0.0005659316,0.20164916,0.0006465346,0.7716927,0.019904101,0.00009457643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03194486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018427363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03194486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067556878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008209783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08777678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715371","doi":"10.29173/mlj1297","title":"Blurred Lines: A Critical Examination of the Use of Police Officers and Police Employees as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Impartiality; Gatekeeping; Supreme court; Admissible evidence; Objectivity (philosophy); Law; Harm; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1987371124765167,"score_gpt":0.3971998836199393,"score_spread":0.1984627711434226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.259111,0.10782094,0.026374908,0.37842113,0.0052156905,0.0020468,0.00012389054,0.00010791034,0.2207778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89548355,0.02025426,0.0116596855,0.06442949,0.0011702836,0.000573889,0.000025430554,0.00006651292,0.0063369307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8376511,0.10770332,0.01038426,0.006399473,0.03064699,0.0072149383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48182344,0.4595616,0.0132732345,0.0057918746,0.036343757,0.0032060074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14402704,0.0005809164,0.0009381478,0.012518332,0.024697011,0.02461334,0.0057799206,0.019028181,0.0013571861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4519113,0.0016125061,0.0010945835,0.0071230573,0.046388075,0.021623882,0.0076913335,0.0184776,0.00019227626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023605605,0.000083829116,0.008005636,0.0014412166,0.00010308365,0.0021944155,0.31952026,0.00067917455,0.00064084714,0.5292834,0.016988473,0.120823584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024523347,0.00087696454,0.026745887,0.02328628,0.00073427893,0.0018591081,0.33829018,0.0038441007,0.002066946,0.1868874,0.41461653,0.00054709177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17311116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3411239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82688886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047171198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06644328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7616969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715374","doi":"10.29173/mlj1292","title":"The Devil’s Playground: A Case Study of Elgin-Middlesex Detention Centre (EMDC) Demonstrating the System Failings of the Ontario Corrections Regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Action (physics); Democracy; Prison reform; Political science; Plague (disease); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Public administration; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03835937613428785,"score_gpt":0.2671913196198138,"score_spread":0.22883194348552593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93464404,0.001587464,0.0010297534,0.02026486,0.00021503154,0.00018628481,0.00019049921,0.000032558233,0.041849524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971193,0.0016284286,0.00093314395,0.0028293827,0.00005048241,0.00006871214,0.0000628169,0.000037807884,0.023196189],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720395,0.0010889989,0.00006118148,0.00021132476,0.00064359966,0.0007908967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792814,0.0005649222,0.00024057002,0.00008158595,0.00032544837,0.0008593735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015765902,0.0007913871,0.00054385,0.0014206492,0.035092622,0.0036232497,0.002744132,0.0036118652,0.004616487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039870255,0.0004970718,0.00044833653,0.0016246027,0.011387732,0.0017596027,0.005172987,0.004409822,0.0003836614],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003455191,0.00009681474,0.011636276,0.00017196988,0.000016547323,0.040719755,0.916206,0.00017839149,0.0007362409,0.012986776,0.0107712215,0.0064453697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006419219,0.000049957827,0.007879125,0.00022290497,0.000012438143,0.0047567687,0.9341973,0.00016558052,0.00024472567,0.00061308953,0.051825937,0.000025725505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7790323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9583689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22096771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030721815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025909515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44453806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715375","doi":"10.29173/mlj1294","title":"Reconsidering Luxton in the Post-Nur Revolution: A Brief Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Recent Challenges to Mandatory Minimums and Other Sentencing Provisions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Proportionality (law); Phenomenon; Momentum (technical analysis); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2201731222614722,"score_gpt":0.3953958835768836,"score_spread":0.1752227613154114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91698277,0.0009783709,0.0009326038,0.010005039,0.00004924608,0.00017788788,0.0004262867,0.000011218675,0.07043652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872256,0.0006748951,0.0004718812,0.0015226848,0.00004031484,0.00014708604,0.00024021594,0.000022287464,0.009655016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892029,0.004558683,0.000401842,0.0006479365,0.0034179266,0.0017706444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649848,0.026650269,0.0034995754,0.0005422448,0.0036147812,0.000708287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013609968,0.00020561376,0.00035805328,0.0034051132,0.005289266,0.007870527,0.0014822868,0.0027853267,0.0037210544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03960023,0.00032924625,0.00033940855,0.0045733694,0.0115899965,0.008479729,0.003357684,0.004039516,0.000398432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025174115,0.00021043832,0.06285526,0.0005212259,0.000040895167,0.0016772655,0.6032306,0.0008526077,0.0026080217,0.27275103,0.01218988,0.042811006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016399155,0.00021121303,0.17377678,0.00042482113,0.000015847776,0.0003087093,0.71617246,0.0011271846,0.0013639558,0.010076444,0.09641021,0.00009603388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041337367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063803375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017677356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005400132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12825876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715377","doi":"10.29173/mlj1289","title":"Year in Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Skepticism; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Period (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.05163883475013758,"score_gpt":0.3343908235187593,"score_spread":0.28275198876862173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715377","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007705308,0.48503178,0.0019888545,0.054254472,0.24537659,0.0019643682,0.020653224,0.001170055,0.18879017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010148572,0.57786125,0.0028244525,0.06401674,0.09867569,0.0015495494,0.019561961,0.0011607205,0.22420111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951933,0.00080105354,0.0010580184,0.00059672876,0.0017720234,0.0005788555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801558,0.0028760955,0.0023818624,0.0012148228,0.010755806,0.0026155922],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037557243,0.0010101752,0.002545191,0.007443714,0.0014788039,0.011581373,0.002562216,0.003056478,0.31277117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028522449,0.00054905534,0.001620937,0.006222923,0.0009551252,0.006804773,0.003575213,0.0035289794,0.16282664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068188376,0.000024656796,0.00024267253,0.015039267,0.0000804604,0.00015382117,0.00008634034,0.000039308146,0.00018307594,0.0030119438,0.86256254,0.11850766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014323996,0.000014900538,0.00029574774,0.0061348276,0.000038307127,0.00020961618,0.000056702393,0.000008252852,0.00003795349,0.00059251883,0.9925896,0.0000072862777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025718869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004472433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034745536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014539446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715380","doi":"10.29173/mlj1301","title":"11(e) Shattered: The Historic and Continued Breaching of Indigenous Persons Right to Reasonable and Timely Bail","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021260275935667202,"score_gpt":0.2604292109257729,"score_spread":0.23916893499010572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25431332,0.0065710833,0.0023378427,0.09364271,0.0014885557,0.00011764943,0.0004846354,0.00009136206,0.64095277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7389579,0.0019472797,0.0013877603,0.031604357,0.00014446044,0.00005333122,0.000066560664,0.000024110677,0.22581431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987463,0.00017955549,0.000041740037,0.00017599258,0.0003810062,0.00047535857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990219,0.0002910494,0.000108178756,0.000080431506,0.00030808768,0.00019040634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014342034,0.00017779802,0.00013601195,0.00041648553,0.013610244,0.0035344486,0.0012252511,0.005006903,0.0043934523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002596323,0.0003243845,0.00021812638,0.0006094731,0.011174811,0.0013962514,0.0020008103,0.00520153,0.00043155748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003679355,0.000040671828,0.012259181,0.00019083795,0.000010461489,0.0034549762,0.12032496,0.00021043468,0.0017728236,0.76620036,0.06606502,0.029433532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016203912,0.00009834814,0.061908606,0.0006634446,0.000038184386,0.0017609927,0.07423725,0.0004949324,0.0022614335,0.017587498,0.8407897,0.00014344137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8699294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95424396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13007063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015040058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028273642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2616732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715927","doi":"10.29173/mlj1200","title":"Reclaiming Prima Facie Exclusionary Rules in Canada, Ireland, New Zealand ,and the United States: The Importance of Compensation, Proportionality, and Non-Repetition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Proportionality (law); Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.036697639324328464,"score_gpt":0.27024006849156507,"score_spread":0.2335424291672366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79657084,0.002360026,0.0020413077,0.044580437,0.000338952,0.00045436143,0.0003289121,0.000042246604,0.15328291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987043,0.0006378406,0.0016618792,0.0035614932,0.000036199872,0.00006350731,0.00012823814,0.000021418975,0.0068463143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97550607,0.0031539367,0.0019281843,0.0014696465,0.011256824,0.0066853804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93405825,0.01723042,0.009587262,0.0040261205,0.027921602,0.007176433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021163542,0.00030874283,0.00090382213,0.0038280932,0.014704982,0.010425897,0.004065233,0.0026812623,0.0027397913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0888892,0.0005257547,0.00069775706,0.003939346,0.0122959735,0.0043599927,0.005169901,0.007873231,0.00022199962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057339296,0.00047548953,0.34692496,0.0004273767,0.0002808917,0.002151796,0.07790691,0.0030067447,0.0010309853,0.30378938,0.043493856,0.2199383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025219534,0.00017078701,0.70120615,0.0014827879,0.00033571653,0.0006111882,0.118497945,0.006685807,0.0035335943,0.046066478,0.12066143,0.0004958872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98220026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99367106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067945324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067945324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21040225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49298012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396717253","doi":"10.29173/mlj1004","title":"Challenging Infanticide: Why Section 233 of Canadas Criminal Code is Unconstitutional","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; History; Law; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Operating system","score_opus":0.06206093319474116,"score_gpt":0.32946729573582184,"score_spread":0.2674063625410807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396717253","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04986352,0.0051550926,0.003949142,0.6235421,0.0041025653,0.00010702043,0.00019249684,0.00016100041,0.3129271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54241896,0.003467214,0.0039349673,0.39069918,0.0015247829,0.00012878951,0.00015120581,0.00018536742,0.057489514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97827893,0.00329746,0.00064130174,0.0023843946,0.009330504,0.006067355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798554,0.0066389823,0.000804404,0.00075185485,0.009727415,0.0022218565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013857783,0.00044750393,0.00047758155,0.0011485043,0.020484556,0.010519056,0.0037349393,0.014125415,0.005114302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045387875,0.00049244304,0.00058554526,0.0009816792,0.018720586,0.0034588003,0.0035229998,0.016616069,0.000902893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021173624,0.000023683366,0.0040572393,0.00006185884,0.000015376268,0.0006031028,0.0121764615,0.0002958345,0.00039775306,0.78792113,0.17199244,0.022433894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007332037,0.00009404848,0.012531974,0.0011086895,0.00008644056,0.0005646338,0.022267273,0.0014483685,0.00125261,0.14472878,0.81558007,0.00026380873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8908341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9055741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10916591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037068605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099306874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2689528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784722","doi":"10.7202/1111190ar","title":"Les délais injustifiés dans l’administration publique : la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’arrêt Law Society of Saskatchewan c Abrametz","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02260898432843,"score_gpt":0.31728082083192416,"score_spread":0.29467183650349416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049840815,0.14110963,0.0007854017,0.65434706,0.006096968,0.00021015001,0.0010267198,0.000034965058,0.1465482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56392217,0.1007064,0.0012008104,0.1481412,0.0015659701,0.00020756011,0.00048412167,0.00007797048,0.18369378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676896,0.0025720668,0.0007596235,0.0010212434,0.005161692,0.0037163827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832444,0.006112431,0.0006585144,0.00035241514,0.006882692,0.0027494768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009774037,0.0005307703,0.00083012175,0.0026268647,0.0152993705,0.013661609,0.0021064437,0.0094164,0.0068313335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016380053,0.000905626,0.00062917575,0.0036161165,0.011355589,0.0034607782,0.0038794982,0.011711302,0.0007061794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014794181,0.000047739195,0.008711874,0.00080996077,0.00014670935,0.0011350857,0.012310114,0.00076114456,0.001128718,0.4132255,0.5224782,0.039097022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010034982,0.00005167271,0.037827242,0.0027083538,0.00020143356,0.000268474,0.023742888,0.00037909133,0.0011748697,0.022499222,0.9106232,0.00042321318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99152136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11859801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11859801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27759892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8604928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791208","doi":"10.4324/9781003496236-6","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.044417152827837876,"score_gpt":0.3051911268003689,"score_spread":0.26077397397253105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031883045,0.00191889,0.0003049296,0.009527047,0.0005080849,0.000040735715,0.00024274504,0.000022312051,0.9871165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02017981,0.002194326,0.00070806086,0.01049614,0.00027197404,0.00013078313,0.0001631176,0.000068137226,0.9657877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946414,0.0005197221,0.00009550322,0.00053269754,0.0028393893,0.0013712834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981926,0.00023683895,0.00003472992,0.00018771827,0.0011070981,0.00024100306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023812028,0.0011954346,0.0009155174,0.0036471945,0.017041946,0.01344183,0.002446834,0.010451934,0.05613317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006095216,0.0009521581,0.00077671296,0.003586195,0.010903696,0.004402618,0.0030533327,0.011583164,0.010448788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032082435,0.0000052677915,0.000037055044,0.000012927889,0.0000016689795,0.000014456293,0.00023823527,0.00003973633,0.000014193689,0.8142349,0.1792707,0.006127608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005414811,0.000001997926,0.00023074086,0.0000932907,0.0000037853274,0.000018932687,0.00023641484,0.000063292246,0.000027093325,0.08472371,0.91458046,0.000014960728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9358768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96290576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07107126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07107126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09655632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5156605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396958677","doi":"10.1515/9780776629261-011","title":"CHAPTER 9 A Human Rights-Based Approach to Data Protection in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.11958815203808106,"score_gpt":0.26093903945613955,"score_spread":0.1413508874180585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396958677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025206024,0.014116602,0.003641157,0.030760713,0.00090637297,0.00015030528,0.0006214792,0.000121589575,0.9471612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07568093,0.020002639,0.0067309025,0.010912375,0.0002879043,0.00012565342,0.00038035566,0.00019256434,0.8856867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619365,0.00038209747,0.000113561386,0.00032535466,0.001991189,0.0009942355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745256,0.00062478083,0.00006392797,0.00013274584,0.0013678664,0.00035802744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023867586,0.0006297217,0.00053873763,0.0038613637,0.016574709,0.0153249,0.0025631494,0.005137673,0.031871744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055451086,0.00084226666,0.00073787494,0.005959385,0.009320811,0.0033124825,0.0024763388,0.0062107733,0.0026946226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070646693,0.000017080407,0.00029114317,0.0000931703,0.000006535508,0.00012649717,0.0024850045,0.00036878977,0.00011302835,0.7764297,0.19395319,0.026108736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041531503,0.0000038910644,0.0009759547,0.00024714856,0.000009350741,0.000071905066,0.0012937095,0.00032177003,0.00016425928,0.045578144,0.951303,0.000026629856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13600859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13600859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2484786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398133286","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4831917","title":"Data as Protected Investment in the Background of Einarsson v. Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05626605959258878,"score_gpt":0.34793295820745224,"score_spread":0.29166689861486345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398133286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085989706,0.0036109015,0.003057931,0.18628478,0.0012196396,0.00017827358,0.003952486,0.00013930873,0.71556705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75675505,0.001960584,0.0019063436,0.05994803,0.00047773976,0.000079312376,0.00093007693,0.00014894562,0.1777939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987818,0.0010212293,0.00028135962,0.0012897636,0.0058430154,0.0037466316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98385483,0.0049760737,0.0006484143,0.0012580513,0.0072304634,0.0020320946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007096025,0.00041965346,0.0006304342,0.0017133289,0.010274376,0.010482358,0.003058772,0.0098874895,0.011713471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032051347,0.00061258406,0.00047166483,0.0031646325,0.0060472097,0.003405827,0.0030106956,0.010436524,0.00081532093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008746528,0.000023466791,0.004804093,0.000060879138,0.000023211407,0.0005436302,0.0024771318,0.0004274668,0.00032714277,0.8641177,0.11449653,0.012611348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008209585,0.00006910409,0.021355148,0.00069327996,0.00016928914,0.00033014693,0.004110599,0.002326421,0.002303417,0.12101853,0.84734356,0.00019848782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98185456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069059014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069059014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1537212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5010606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763430","doi":"10.29173/mlj924","title":"The Restorative Justice Act: An Enhancement to Justice in Manitoba?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13681973693014327,"score_gpt":0.38382854104674136,"score_spread":0.2470088041165981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763430","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25784776,0.101745516,0.0013043734,0.4646137,0.0027193371,0.00029933767,0.00044816162,0.0001207038,0.17090116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7975056,0.05565638,0.0038216156,0.05430477,0.00062739913,0.0001698174,0.00020792957,0.000041758074,0.08766479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990864,0.00019377879,0.000027779204,0.000053352527,0.00015558851,0.0004832106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866974,0.00020008517,0.00013221972,0.00005012057,0.0003211881,0.0006266341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009464852,0.00034015992,0.00019787095,0.0011655566,0.00942543,0.0052714758,0.0015163393,0.0030362397,0.004589474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022249615,0.00036348298,0.0003001152,0.0022389297,0.0057906583,0.0017493307,0.0030456102,0.0024842352,0.0003727283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023565744,0.0004289906,0.09438168,0.002355296,0.00007186316,0.012754528,0.09767876,0.0012377418,0.005659814,0.36081356,0.15971407,0.26466796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046098856,0.00011439266,0.17962423,0.0023776905,0.00007072541,0.0012907038,0.08126851,0.000682082,0.0008675291,0.01343064,0.7200785,0.00014880185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9522749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04772508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04179882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11933164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30327302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398770012","doi":"10.29173/mlj916","title":"The First by the Court Decisions: The Emergence of a Practice of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02609555368168191,"score_gpt":0.2896054080458155,"score_spread":0.2635098543641336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398770012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5034602,0.0049630417,0.0043717353,0.27903053,0.0014652517,0.00017381406,0.00032294434,0.000106988846,0.20610546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636387,0.0007619927,0.0016442701,0.00996869,0.00010352382,0.000027140186,0.000039124196,0.0000800099,0.023736555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885244,0.0022930687,0.00025000304,0.002101681,0.003358691,0.0034720458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96564275,0.008108458,0.0015641978,0.001441471,0.013157873,0.010085331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008223145,0.0002697064,0.000544624,0.0021014002,0.050577015,0.01713702,0.003963057,0.0088506965,0.0056910533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037352752,0.0007043493,0.00046067307,0.0046522496,0.02336627,0.0032983252,0.0041856314,0.012905454,0.00030436422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009759944,0.00010969613,0.028646447,0.000119087075,0.00006149775,0.0016546877,0.17610398,0.000956144,0.0011017169,0.6440837,0.08203426,0.06503125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007125422,0.0000833469,0.06622832,0.0006922401,0.000094671384,0.0005777521,0.160508,0.0032308046,0.0011367357,0.044822898,0.7222119,0.00034195828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16055301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16055301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38404334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97363955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399041416","doi":"10.29173/mlj808","title":"Bill 25, the Manitoba Evidence Amendment Act (Scheduling of Criminal Organizations) Reviews: 4th Session, 39th Legislature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Advertising","score_opus":0.0878629700160003,"score_gpt":0.3502726637624275,"score_spread":0.2624096937464272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399041416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033786103,0.009522009,0.0076267105,0.3988869,0.03668741,0.014169786,0.036451355,0.0041938694,0.458676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022633646,0.00247762,0.0101002,0.3224563,0.0040614717,0.0047778357,0.0038532407,0.0004401834,0.62919956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96539104,0.0053347666,0.0038621838,0.0028446498,0.016084285,0.006483093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925044,0.029199589,0.0036806513,0.0030900335,0.03192097,0.007064792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036848705,0.0021710899,0.0021581766,0.0074268994,0.022807226,0.01338308,0.010302586,0.05325184,0.027318664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07861504,0.006629889,0.002639278,0.005392531,0.004126866,0.0027773501,0.0036404063,0.019834435,0.020081611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019600823,0.00027943746,0.0027061792,0.00019697478,0.00006277148,0.00036836462,0.0008091036,0.00021337126,0.0011505875,0.014413856,0.97157615,0.008027175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043840826,0.00024612702,0.032186728,0.0011032877,0.0002789969,0.00017409929,0.00095607433,0.00072237756,0.0022045278,0.0030730162,0.9583644,0.00025185538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6145243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89081895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3854757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03645785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16655245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77549165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060783","doi":"10.29173/mlj757","title":"Khosa - Still Searching for That Star","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Tribunal; Political science; Immigration; Legislature","score_opus":0.09696587295950729,"score_gpt":0.3625784842182593,"score_spread":0.265612611258752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060783","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020374795,0.016833149,0.00721472,0.5379654,0.0130043365,0.00019548787,0.00031360376,0.00041167732,0.40368688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34863648,0.006631442,0.010484685,0.42412847,0.00306457,0.00015388353,0.00021648285,0.00029167449,0.2063923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916751,0.0017466133,0.00066652265,0.0015545341,0.0033535918,0.0010036903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871336,0.0038891716,0.00096551573,0.0022463517,0.0046214024,0.001143983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009347197,0.00035279966,0.0006216161,0.0011010031,0.010165617,0.015785739,0.0014161007,0.0077126194,0.013160742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01764043,0.0005412746,0.00059196475,0.0010717502,0.011419421,0.009875751,0.00475876,0.010172251,0.0054709893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005752042,0.00003820477,0.0011427199,0.00021881431,0.000019821697,0.0002837635,0.0040893694,0.000047425732,0.0008292097,0.729925,0.22520275,0.03814551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022867394,0.000040117186,0.001527563,0.00035852232,0.000023062972,0.00038470593,0.00413911,0.00013462041,0.00070192345,0.049375996,0.94322854,0.00006300368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013381218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02104467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98661876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053216466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010669354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04943329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060925","doi":"10.29173/mlj728","title":"Conditional Sentences in Manitoba: A Prisoner in Your Own Home","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science; Criminology","score_opus":0.059374622234024364,"score_gpt":0.32431513232138276,"score_spread":0.2649405100873584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731847,0.00053531124,0.00011333214,0.016724067,0.00012785586,0.00006436652,0.00025474746,0.00001142629,0.008984158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782758,0.0011477611,0.00019875793,0.007769111,0.000049934846,0.000040152256,0.00011402741,0.000017267968,0.01238716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991411,0.00013693087,0.000035470464,0.000064429885,0.00007819927,0.00054381933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976157,0.00045748844,0.00032611346,0.000051779403,0.00055569445,0.0009931951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083572115,0.00043216962,0.00043441946,0.00078237336,0.018934589,0.001961697,0.0021988626,0.005098418,0.0067950436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038783187,0.0006218244,0.00034855725,0.0013325048,0.0023975256,0.001362243,0.0034053256,0.008034264,0.0005984551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007767643,0.0018014606,0.5216106,0.0003065228,0.00013300788,0.14064941,0.2116506,0.0006128658,0.0032516047,0.012915946,0.07222306,0.03406818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009314216,0.00043084807,0.45221114,0.00068345375,0.00023950572,0.015176367,0.50388813,0.0009231193,0.0011133505,0.002215198,0.022853699,0.00017204028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.863205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13679498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014706984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031617846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27520114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399523422","doi":"","title":"« Commentaire » de l’article du Professeur David Gilles, Université de Sherbrooke, « Refus d’obéissance, désobéissance civile, désobéissance civique, comme outils de réflexivité juridique »","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02616213689432237,"score_gpt":0.27889803828389503,"score_spread":0.2527359013895727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399523422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005841088,0.0041618706,0.00040710747,0.9116342,0.080042705,0.000023139248,0.00011857789,0.00004944222,0.002978867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0106284665,0.0031264652,0.0003156471,0.88828063,0.06902408,0.00010795047,0.00006556706,0.00015324299,0.028297938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986447,0.00543956,0.00116196,0.0021107441,0.0037073444,0.001133345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93912864,0.042299382,0.0037453012,0.0011636293,0.010788047,0.002875072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007937329,0.0011165071,0.0013802679,0.0017937758,0.008300818,0.010022466,0.0029092333,0.023451587,0.0072500682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087119125,0.00076662033,0.0011322686,0.0014126813,0.008571126,0.0061323377,0.0036041134,0.036294058,0.0049596583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002806388,0.000010099866,0.00016018453,0.000112924245,0.000011021146,0.00015692083,0.0016549687,0.000040278086,0.00014087894,0.0044839582,0.9916338,0.0015669167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015573933,0.000013373521,0.0010035993,0.00023638763,0.000013503642,0.00021426957,0.0025806304,0.00010965476,0.00042505522,0.0015745676,0.993772,0.000041324056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060563117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07877616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008848354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009520408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12042123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399765260","doi":"10.7202/1111997ar","title":"Évaluer une politique judiciaire hybride : trajectoire des dossiers d’accusés admis à un programme de justice réparatrice implanté à la Cour du Québec","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.017879059217829747,"score_gpt":0.28579341820988297,"score_spread":0.26791435899205324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399765260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8354886,0.004473242,0.03486464,0.011448256,0.00020477269,0.0012707413,0.0009931691,0.00011651163,0.11114013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639639,0.0007442448,0.014535644,0.0005875816,0.00001955951,0.0004611229,0.00021738428,0.000030051187,0.019440457],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926324,0.00596635,0.00021799756,0.0007667322,0.0027877325,0.0009979204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823444,0.009673427,0.0015209398,0.0007928575,0.004505534,0.0011629298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017723918,0.00045904986,0.0006171098,0.0015782447,0.0039903866,0.005885634,0.0010412441,0.0021754599,0.009761062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031611614,0.00032246203,0.000511694,0.002346288,0.0038289952,0.0023487245,0.0030091642,0.0022534956,0.0006190732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001528514,0.0010618927,0.14841017,0.0012440283,0.0008748948,0.0005453347,0.05501353,0.061082687,0.005383821,0.16721791,0.01947121,0.53816605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006109382,0.0056943377,0.58372164,0.003241877,0.0008466932,0.00032473446,0.10334681,0.06526716,0.0071116826,0.05197433,0.17730278,0.0005569721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63331586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7351054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36668414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03699678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042272206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73768723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399820974","doi":"10.1515/9782760526983-011","title":"La Sûreté du Québec","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.025441567247950058,"score_gpt":0.21225977999252807,"score_spread":0.18681821274457802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399820974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018737046,0.051502828,0.001411657,0.01841174,0.0027183543,0.000094199895,0.005925999,0.0003231623,0.90087515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03720483,0.007691091,0.0007777106,0.0011975953,0.00008343465,0.00003403825,0.0006924999,0.00007356913,0.95224524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926704,0.00007686542,0.000028786597,0.000119135766,0.00030606065,0.00020210227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994442,0.00008502288,0.000034847795,0.000039383664,0.00031481474,0.00008181625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054152077,0.0006955609,0.0005905666,0.0013450172,0.006109943,0.004048241,0.00078744267,0.0015462221,0.08220551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013098571,0.0004836273,0.000446466,0.002455831,0.0011148481,0.0010627218,0.00093528995,0.0028172696,0.005377863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112926755,0.000066399385,0.005737739,0.0003547432,0.00006250436,0.0007127233,0.0019566342,0.0008527359,0.0010530375,0.20837581,0.5191846,0.26153013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011230666,0.000010218131,0.008274583,0.00015932466,0.0000097637385,0.00007378253,0.0003388154,0.00017363492,0.00018551844,0.0010531889,0.98969424,0.000015738433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97756004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99002004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08220551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028213143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041295797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2750048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400152437","doi":"10.1787/1b20375e-en","title":"The Regulated Conduct Defence ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; European Commission","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.12646414298901454,"score_gpt":0.36907640341275016,"score_spread":0.24261226042373563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400152437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052672694,0.010337168,0.008744404,0.33328703,0.011848487,0.00040730298,0.0009850377,0.00017489222,0.6289484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21021685,0.005788483,0.007658424,0.49721053,0.0059202346,0.0015093654,0.000772445,0.00030162744,0.27062201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9204154,0.02340041,0.00433261,0.008657702,0.03496318,0.0082307365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96265584,0.016546782,0.00295185,0.003783125,0.011725193,0.0023372732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043183535,0.0014796265,0.0014092402,0.003460709,0.009627813,0.025205664,0.003956114,0.047441375,0.008017711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082785845,0.0010592373,0.0029781247,0.003609676,0.01942635,0.009357088,0.010147094,0.03661012,0.0041309674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019694691,0.000020031928,0.00020462304,0.00005963514,0.000009112227,0.00009011399,0.00063847966,0.00014556834,0.00012004574,0.90602076,0.086476795,0.00619521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046677247,0.000049619855,0.00067594077,0.0007615667,0.000026790634,0.00015050195,0.00085780816,0.00023277674,0.00052190584,0.10355122,0.893058,0.000067239525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077191815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05023899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077191815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02747413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0658786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22837907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400238336","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4878572","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Common law","score_opus":0.0462843191204068,"score_gpt":0.33549360916416326,"score_spread":0.28920929004375645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400238336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48981684,0.01139668,0.013099401,0.17867833,0.00029465393,0.00019436935,0.00023340253,0.000077023804,0.3062093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570125,0.000444557,0.0004089335,0.0018356428,0.00004792914,0.000021742459,0.000013493867,0.0000131770585,0.0015132122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96240026,0.019476408,0.0013922072,0.0020235297,0.007409681,0.0072978735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383161,0.122469746,0.005909364,0.0037004163,0.022525614,0.007078879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0385941,0.0002556937,0.001344101,0.005177163,0.016763022,0.018228088,0.0026036557,0.007775564,0.0043121628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13732211,0.0005642935,0.0009742935,0.005394027,0.059953846,0.010427949,0.006893995,0.011087961,0.00023366304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054344946,0.000041302825,0.0028514105,0.000027130049,0.000027205806,0.00009371518,0.009409799,0.00086153153,0.000051341056,0.9800591,0.002681423,0.0038416004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001019871,0.00004871171,0.019628018,0.00026925225,0.00010654745,0.000085079344,0.017869234,0.0032658072,0.00025688898,0.93629533,0.021918813,0.00015441343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8080002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79962665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1919998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058367234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09042908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42348593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400292151","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4852570","title":"A Lifeline During Custodial Interrogations? The Right to Counsel and Reflections on R. v. Dussault and R. v. Lafrance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; Political science; Law; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02209849200361528,"score_gpt":0.3503834680058488,"score_spread":0.3282849760022335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400292151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003294624,0.0021975893,0.0003066296,0.9761287,0.0013241568,0.000007204047,0.000021624275,0.000012320388,0.016707212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26465583,0.005169637,0.0007707513,0.7057885,0.0036739416,0.00007672022,0.000035399487,0.000081352264,0.019747904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670934,0.020902256,0.0014045669,0.0020108952,0.0029242912,0.0056646713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916316,0.06320883,0.0036785824,0.003114829,0.0070641884,0.0066175815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051210407,0.00039006,0.0008246746,0.0008046796,0.019367337,0.015800066,0.0050918744,0.06410426,0.006687474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12303494,0.0009454628,0.00085860275,0.0007493657,0.02892732,0.016246231,0.006766597,0.046782635,0.0016069026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020336565,0.000112768,0.0018858135,0.00019468312,0.000024686284,0.002627663,0.07416468,0.0002161163,0.00076967094,0.31849408,0.5562037,0.045102753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014150656,0.00014622894,0.0045912075,0.0025652943,0.000054405948,0.0012440368,0.119236924,0.0002740161,0.00097654096,0.090762526,0.7797561,0.00025116157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09870352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1893424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09870352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012222965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025757939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27082974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019200","doi":"10.29173/alr2781","title":"Transforming Canadian Criminal Justice: A Review of Indictment: The Criminal Justice System on Trial, Benjamin Perrin (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal trial; Sociology","score_opus":0.0785363183776411,"score_gpt":0.37041615143805157,"score_spread":0.29187983306041043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019200","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016627342,0.99527067,0.000031294498,0.003522994,0.00059152674,0.000007419305,0.000046157642,0.000003875502,0.00050939794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005542039,0.9956436,0.00017070764,0.0027258277,0.00040972943,0.000012127476,0.000050816518,0.000005536838,0.0004273884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937895,0.0014074902,0.0006910618,0.00036318973,0.0033429374,0.0004058314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98164314,0.0067670676,0.0010519872,0.00025343464,0.009253048,0.0010311875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013977262,0.0017906099,0.0035028127,0.01272187,0.0024464733,0.00806301,0.003112797,0.004800602,0.006865143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03043203,0.0010177769,0.0014472654,0.022649612,0.0053449264,0.0031879216,0.002584143,0.005383089,0.0011623153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009108026,0.00003315911,0.00029676786,0.04019431,0.00020938282,0.000079629805,0.00043715152,0.0002488275,0.00012786739,0.009583225,0.4914322,0.4572664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058723097,0.000042839052,0.0036230148,0.06473534,0.00041754104,0.00014146349,0.00041247116,0.00006922915,0.00006612119,0.0034336706,0.9269312,0.000068313915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7996742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9341444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047079492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15899386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40301108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401224343","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.3","title":"Reasonable Bail or Bail at All Costs? Defence Counsel Perspectives on a Coercive Environment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer security; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0259015396429139,"score_gpt":0.2830606211934454,"score_spread":0.25715908155053147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401224343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6798999,0.0051232576,0.006469565,0.14510077,0.00023170731,0.00007954194,0.00006445577,0.000026581693,0.16300423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433607,0.00058632425,0.0005706267,0.0023654888,0.000037723858,0.000010993595,0.000005530458,0.0000067017986,0.002080472],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97978336,0.014671584,0.0004900696,0.0006175159,0.0022145635,0.0022229427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96703166,0.025046537,0.0031870604,0.0006084052,0.0015423341,0.0025840816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014526136,0.00031754086,0.00047333268,0.0015671976,0.013472654,0.013075259,0.0014888763,0.0067254384,0.005168356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03065793,0.00038126772,0.0002477272,0.0014104344,0.02818348,0.008777528,0.0055775526,0.0064184465,0.00039125342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004736522,0.000062554536,0.004337101,0.00013368162,0.000012893158,0.0036055562,0.7026332,0.00016680684,0.00086860923,0.27445012,0.0036916544,0.009990412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015273552,0.000035083485,0.0035846932,0.00052390655,0.000009528848,0.0010742823,0.87839615,0.00038673906,0.00033235629,0.056527797,0.05907939,0.00003471896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01635709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033954445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011696222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011070595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08486241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401309785","doi":"10.59962/9780774870498-006","title":"2 Quebec and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014895869664800523,"score_gpt":0.19424806057983904,"score_spread":0.1793521909150385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401309785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033276519,0.03670446,0.00059570087,0.039351348,0.0020488813,0.00007877809,0.0016609746,0.00007781027,0.91615444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058769822,0.011953538,0.0009470426,0.008809506,0.0003429699,0.00007363911,0.0003808112,0.000094401046,0.91862816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981831,0.00026054896,0.000040304665,0.0001850187,0.0006580931,0.0006728087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987264,0.0002267101,0.000043255506,0.000079242614,0.00074023823,0.00018423019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010329551,0.00088116026,0.00053333765,0.003239002,0.014191646,0.010860921,0.0014294295,0.005031767,0.045900032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002829084,0.00068221317,0.00053116784,0.0054015303,0.0056754593,0.0026277632,0.0014008118,0.0051837564,0.0028932143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018307424,0.000017127444,0.00054970325,0.00006695952,0.000005924185,0.00011140551,0.0017068271,0.00025505864,0.000063803345,0.4788856,0.49249464,0.025824683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005158255,0.0000030976594,0.0015539194,0.00014398863,0.000005486846,0.000028092207,0.000730816,0.00009895891,0.000041118277,0.007760992,0.9896101,0.000018241706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99545634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09290427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09290427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13474298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67407084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401504973","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4907051","title":"Tribunals for Access to Justice in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Computer security; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.042783526163790865,"score_gpt":0.3849530558555388,"score_spread":0.3421695296917479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401504973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30507556,0.0094708875,0.0010090946,0.33571023,0.005121955,0.00078405713,0.0044348873,0.0002642947,0.33812904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7320941,0.0027627475,0.0011960706,0.071912244,0.0005923464,0.00027152692,0.0007693608,0.00018102727,0.1902206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97882,0.0010276303,0.000594124,0.0010044429,0.004906652,0.013647095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646605,0.003207582,0.00089844957,0.00057550834,0.012337371,0.018320464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005302081,0.00049944984,0.0014240552,0.0038180342,0.032542758,0.015427029,0.005136832,0.011806482,0.03044377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027138636,0.0011864777,0.0016044916,0.0042872103,0.004800517,0.0031188235,0.008881369,0.01458238,0.001138603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000491069,0.00032590187,0.05797748,0.00049157767,0.0002919392,0.0017512712,0.011004073,0.0016950025,0.00093638716,0.31471488,0.5425711,0.06774934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038141786,0.00024050147,0.1931409,0.0017112019,0.00044007227,0.00053150527,0.037543032,0.0036404054,0.0009315194,0.022863945,0.7380027,0.00057286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18507344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18507344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44985813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535339","doi":"10.7202/1107397ar","title":"LES NOUVEAUX ALINÉAS 258(1) C) ET D) DU CODE CRIMINEL : PROBLÈME DE CONSTITUTIONNALITÉ ?","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04540679286980958,"score_gpt":0.2697645118999523,"score_spread":0.22435771903014273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020534948,0.05137239,0.010825002,0.6747917,0.0141734015,0.00011570097,0.00036606993,0.00008306887,0.22773771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5767153,0.035019375,0.013408192,0.23888956,0.014622578,0.0005729797,0.00035557628,0.00021607574,0.12020032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98353577,0.0056127347,0.0008130819,0.0020185392,0.0063742953,0.0016455365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97023207,0.01801253,0.0028021187,0.0021549824,0.0055485233,0.0012497908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013237046,0.00047695602,0.0009765937,0.0022762227,0.0089742765,0.009213682,0.0023748544,0.014574448,0.008013052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056425005,0.00046488259,0.00075591874,0.0024549307,0.031565346,0.009495126,0.0049166726,0.014641383,0.0016471659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002512579,0.000017899385,0.0010329842,0.0001371252,0.000010393262,0.00013610674,0.004311753,0.00008141648,0.00011142216,0.8639452,0.10914685,0.021043707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026378319,0.0000429548,0.0045656217,0.001355808,0.000024192004,0.0006098248,0.0064553465,0.00039177822,0.0008698215,0.27731168,0.7082335,0.000113146016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051581547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056112364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051581547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008530187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011799213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102562666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535386","doi":"10.7202/1107471ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]\"CRIMINAL LAW SOURCEBOOK\"","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01501260120989535,"score_gpt":0.23509588906636109,"score_spread":0.22008328785646575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093964575,0.01329788,0.0071188947,0.02065851,0.06379398,0.00075618055,0.17551358,0.0068384674,0.7110828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028800478,0.0088982005,0.0024836825,0.0030623367,0.005067642,0.0004346721,0.04607314,0.0017936272,0.9293067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987847,0.0001530387,0.0001592023,0.000108754415,0.0006974067,0.000096915996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101114,0.0025415586,0.0004126319,0.0008864421,0.004801324,0.00034681158],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011229535,0.0015142852,0.001346767,0.014684048,0.0014733248,0.005421816,0.0024686086,0.0021907934,0.36763844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01078762,0.0009071995,0.00081538345,0.017022809,0.0008334844,0.0030063344,0.0015624928,0.0027136714,0.2773522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011315078,0.0000051810375,0.000031867756,0.00016167275,0.0000017367713,0.0000062806293,0.000012455005,0.000039194198,0.000041770814,0.0015443998,0.98236036,0.015783818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006026045,0.000006219847,0.0005728356,0.0001887172,0.0000030672484,0.00002123107,0.000017866507,0.000053119322,0.00009585234,0.00077614933,0.99825174,0.0000071430695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035271343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038842145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36763844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002319505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051184935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.901987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535623","doi":"10.7202/1107464ar","title":"LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ET L’IMPRÉCISION : QUAND L’AVERTISSEMENT RAISONNABLE DEVIENT SYMBOLIQUE","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012334892202827913,"score_gpt":0.23703598648366236,"score_spread":0.22470109428083446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09782327,0.050321072,0.010869891,0.18268384,0.001649115,0.00005482877,0.0012143205,0.00007020991,0.65531343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398236,0.011120181,0.001743719,0.009280056,0.00036319168,0.000025708172,0.00018050247,0.000056412722,0.03740655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898947,0.0015350241,0.00040263915,0.0009998824,0.0056027058,0.0015650947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842433,0.0073558083,0.0015225564,0.0007695287,0.005357536,0.0007512679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047917683,0.0004086175,0.0007581273,0.0020984604,0.010634153,0.011198779,0.0018257448,0.004241865,0.01184895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031528357,0.00048075023,0.0005091922,0.0031983564,0.03203715,0.0066868085,0.0049592773,0.0075818715,0.0005427059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076892735,0.000010336766,0.005820931,0.00017909647,0.0000542588,0.00035450776,0.015560884,0.0003920809,0.00019338963,0.9265576,0.024696173,0.026103742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054527638,0.00004538266,0.039137162,0.0018598116,0.00017119522,0.000596543,0.030914491,0.00093617325,0.0013841076,0.47169995,0.4528653,0.00033531425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8603581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9057799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13964188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038883638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055263992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2821219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401673234","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2023-040","title":"The Great Rise . . . and Then the Great Fall: Toronto Police Service's Enforcement of the <i>Ontario Safe Streets Act</i>, 2000–2022","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Service (business); Law enforcement; Political science; Business; Public administration; Criminology; History; Law; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.02832835872979492,"score_gpt":0.2830987621332533,"score_spread":0.25477040340345836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401673234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88785946,0.0048524938,0.000411045,0.033563398,0.00040199613,0.0001441469,0.014993468,0.000035992558,0.057738017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96930593,0.0020418195,0.00027893236,0.0019415226,0.00008911661,0.00006529929,0.0034599027,0.000028918244,0.02278856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970795,0.00021695171,0.00014011863,0.00024520725,0.0013965219,0.0009217528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991601,0.000666088,0.0022655204,0.00029270613,0.0033956242,0.0017790617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019613283,0.00022347347,0.00035894188,0.0015593806,0.0038388567,0.003936366,0.0011390505,0.0008918581,0.0037367959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009181739,0.00045019994,0.00033294724,0.0047649564,0.0035955084,0.0012111743,0.0022067463,0.0017946664,0.00047793836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031668082,0.00004052065,0.8578796,0.00027973196,0.00013073765,0.0003539126,0.0426746,0.00067772105,0.0004173742,0.011057608,0.059581026,0.02659062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009734254,0.00002426147,0.9394384,0.00011623282,0.000025158453,0.000023489629,0.023511862,0.00014328137,0.00011015611,0.00012774032,0.036448505,0.000021183036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060893185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060893185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07923801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44181305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401881495","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4916196","title":"Substantial deference and tribunal expertisepost-Dunsmuir: A new approach to reasonableness review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Deference; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.039573070708174944,"score_gpt":0.33825559929090565,"score_spread":0.2986825285827307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401881495","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021557944,0.035942663,0.50528055,0.16137461,0.0062311157,0.0011331304,0.00056390476,0.00026989877,0.26764616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79154223,0.008866805,0.11790875,0.024993446,0.0061463383,0.0022466755,0.00022873425,0.00022422994,0.04784279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9390591,0.045188595,0.0024018195,0.0042924467,0.0073958784,0.0016622802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8265712,0.14445098,0.0053430796,0.008785589,0.012877097,0.0019719948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0583849,0.00081520056,0.0024261707,0.0068565235,0.0043207025,0.009063856,0.0037071013,0.00825177,0.012303046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1807148,0.0009578336,0.0020599873,0.003441059,0.009727856,0.015082839,0.00528502,0.008391969,0.0009610622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003961309,0.000017079754,0.00022444117,0.00025025403,0.000056234792,0.00008208734,0.00051115936,0.00049938593,0.000039940034,0.96587235,0.010153846,0.022253677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033562155,0.000027935781,0.0002246878,0.00030790217,0.00007207265,0.00006221346,0.00023827078,0.002197071,0.00008769037,0.96846014,0.028264996,0.000023442766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005346022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00922312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0583849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006361059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115326885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3087725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401912214","doi":"10.54648/aila2024031","title":"Richard Arthern v. Ryanair","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Air and Space Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.020982382014231152,"score_gpt":0.3099198387789103,"score_spread":0.28893745676467913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401912214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010420738,0.0059832763,0.00095153827,0.050589483,0.0012789447,0.00010993247,0.0005067036,0.00012011027,0.9300392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11338397,0.0029055816,0.0011821828,0.061609033,0.00050179585,0.00011024037,0.0002671281,0.00009168973,0.8199484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951663,0.0004324128,0.00011395107,0.00053997064,0.0027740148,0.00097329397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972632,0.0007719885,0.00012110715,0.00011915658,0.0012733681,0.0004511235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025846702,0.00042696483,0.00044324255,0.0008352423,0.009805089,0.0041587236,0.0011850834,0.0063886987,0.030924508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009306165,0.0005289037,0.00043967986,0.0005573515,0.002273348,0.0016285117,0.0018555862,0.008055485,0.004918672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094833704,0.000037797286,0.0037327413,0.00017645267,0.000021180227,0.0008212114,0.0024472398,0.00024296556,0.0013774399,0.23106177,0.72061455,0.039371837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015265132,0.000031087842,0.002844902,0.00018291998,0.000019362633,0.00022462753,0.0006181035,0.0001509773,0.00076976797,0.0048324973,0.99026006,0.000050486826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43234864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6581658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43234864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061164093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017902358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8596642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402029116","doi":"","title":"La propagande terroriste saisie par le droit pénal : étude comparée du droit français et du droit canadien","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Criminal law; Political science; Comparative law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019981300905861067,"score_gpt":0.28373701639914317,"score_spread":0.2637557154932821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402029116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137353,0.0037530488,0.00023242629,0.0037303541,0.00010121188,0.000027192169,0.00031003667,0.0000064779524,0.078104034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886375,0.001380401,0.00005469217,0.00032082017,0.000020048967,0.00002436319,0.00013069331,0.000012070434,0.009419381],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973928,0.00080484536,0.00009608291,0.00022733772,0.00060799636,0.0008709187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944022,0.0018629993,0.0012183592,0.00026618788,0.0013796672,0.00087049464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021520467,0.00032199998,0.00037336667,0.003430455,0.0064777345,0.006339979,0.0007362861,0.0009892649,0.009538546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007128249,0.00024440984,0.00038730088,0.0062079253,0.0060074213,0.002939672,0.0035514408,0.0021722557,0.00063502055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019674283,0.00012519173,0.18691699,0.0003770295,0.0001223787,0.0011695618,0.6777991,0.00026837038,0.00043811832,0.07918381,0.008349399,0.045053247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092912505,0.00005170909,0.29356423,0.000678548,0.00005260871,0.0003263667,0.6176752,0.0001911142,0.00014104233,0.0011228806,0.08613607,0.000050904597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60456675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6514874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39543325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016399417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01073098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79552406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402150640","doi":"10.61737/lylc4661","title":"Use of facial recognition by police forces in the public space in Quebec and Canada : elements of comparison with the United States and Europe : English summary","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law enforcement; Software deployment; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Intrusion; Public order; Political science; Executive order; Law; Legislation; Business; Computer security; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.08520904410900011,"score_gpt":0.31107546557194915,"score_spread":0.22586642146294905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402150640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51621425,0.039304607,0.0020227542,0.023960507,0.00063596026,0.0005261406,0.044027805,0.00016347402,0.37314445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8909413,0.024097523,0.0023652234,0.0022004694,0.00013265581,0.00017930486,0.01021004,0.00007582759,0.06979762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996287,0.00036102993,0.00015079693,0.00028629633,0.0021674288,0.0007474927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893582,0.0009832953,0.0007355626,0.0001280284,0.00844569,0.00034913057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022958608,0.00046302844,0.00032859837,0.004660783,0.0036571159,0.0039241374,0.0010331278,0.0004186564,0.007700623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056360103,0.00017433609,0.00050218997,0.009636259,0.0013897716,0.00087939843,0.0008547255,0.0007019259,0.0006698236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003014742,0.00012569208,0.4558857,0.0022281045,0.00018380918,0.0011491154,0.03537198,0.0015453455,0.0019928967,0.013354281,0.12794188,0.35991973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006557465,0.00004962713,0.8391565,0.00082739344,0.0000678822,0.0002206493,0.03155437,0.00037804683,0.00079422566,0.00016932149,0.12669466,0.00008071842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057994496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057994496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059256606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4207815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402310317","doi":"10.1522/revueot.v33n2.1802","title":"Intégrité publique au Canada : description, critiques et observations des réformes proposées par le projet de loi C-290 à la Loi sur la protection des fonctionnaires divulgateurs d’actes répréhensibles","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Organisations & territoires","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04598117788292807,"score_gpt":0.2732151909205739,"score_spread":0.22723401303764582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402310317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13916479,0.022272024,0.0037366725,0.18393758,0.0015921036,0.00046419853,0.001304605,0.00036585325,0.6471622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67970514,0.013018927,0.002948248,0.022073423,0.0002788848,0.00026653078,0.0005661452,0.00018880569,0.2809539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868304,0.0010594409,0.00024846866,0.00075125723,0.007065085,0.004045377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98461723,0.0034481513,0.00080995477,0.0005933104,0.007529031,0.0030022697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064713703,0.0005704013,0.0004465209,0.0036363169,0.02077608,0.014203346,0.0026195964,0.0036702296,0.010895733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015169908,0.0005791387,0.00057626754,0.007669147,0.0146402,0.002602231,0.005245615,0.0068410365,0.0006773695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010897337,0.00015174625,0.011445963,0.00086709514,0.00006391714,0.0012214562,0.10443056,0.00094446976,0.0015412865,0.63387823,0.120892644,0.1244538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003389525,0.00004740935,0.030218907,0.0006579679,0.00004634177,0.00015407136,0.04846305,0.00041958195,0.00065834133,0.0046638274,0.91455245,0.00008410358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74291945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25708055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47254258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8616812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402501614","doi":"10.3917/rjj.190.1239","title":"Injonctions, outrages au tribunal et le droit de manifester au Québec","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de la recherche juridique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.1987796980824261,"score_gpt":0.41695793802268233,"score_spread":0.21817823994025623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402501614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2992156,0.019382272,0.0029992342,0.2094146,0.0015065335,0.000100350204,0.000693448,0.00007475901,0.46661314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85587895,0.0044741426,0.00069761387,0.01036821,0.0001175955,0.000039357223,0.00011727205,0.00003113695,0.12827575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953746,0.0015972184,0.00011037488,0.0003210002,0.001466443,0.0011303195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898342,0.0027584252,0.00081019907,0.0005121158,0.0041784397,0.0019067263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042783325,0.00025957765,0.0003797341,0.0015878237,0.017881135,0.009423385,0.0011208523,0.002334735,0.015067086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014289547,0.00023009609,0.00020509526,0.0019781045,0.011805386,0.0020030646,0.0026409908,0.004419209,0.00072714523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013333197,0.00012626604,0.039815694,0.00044783813,0.00009300991,0.0015597657,0.13344239,0.00061938167,0.0010306,0.5509952,0.15718342,0.11455314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026005933,0.00006482152,0.09298166,0.0016498346,0.000084294996,0.00030362656,0.12648083,0.0005547774,0.0008913951,0.019369688,0.7574489,0.00014415392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98796034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061468095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061468095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08179122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4459843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402869720","doi":"10.5040/9781509966936.ch-011","title":"Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Constitutional Subordinates or Equal Partners?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.17019739520161173,"score_gpt":0.4443136360724759,"score_spread":0.27411624087086417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402869720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15122461,0.012143581,0.00168912,0.22992432,0.0013080419,0.00024888455,0.0023055584,0.0001721854,0.6009837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7548195,0.0039826822,0.0014487143,0.03379833,0.0002858739,0.00011302762,0.00043623376,0.00012870166,0.20498694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853631,0.0012389863,0.00026287173,0.0009148942,0.002891508,0.009328583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839392,0.0028150645,0.000698787,0.00044678838,0.0051196804,0.0069804033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049587972,0.0005481839,0.00091056735,0.0036819635,0.030577697,0.0152622815,0.004575758,0.009197947,0.034090813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020738494,0.00066739175,0.00063127564,0.0064720507,0.012166411,0.0046919524,0.0059897453,0.008479116,0.001658043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008590178,0.00011884659,0.015235727,0.00014657383,0.000036984744,0.00039588488,0.009729726,0.00054019265,0.00018618349,0.68658096,0.2306799,0.05626314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014932668,0.00006256805,0.09275748,0.0009925162,0.00016747975,0.0002739428,0.07854793,0.002416306,0.0006881767,0.08622937,0.7374331,0.0002818425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99670094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99876785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85183024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14816973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40169308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98800236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402956675","doi":"10.46626/affc.2024.18.2.8","title":"A Study on the Improvement of Punishment System in the Inquisitorial Structure : In Relation to an Introduction of the Discipline System in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"교정담론","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Punishment (psychology); Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.02131950438015638,"score_gpt":0.30086681878508914,"score_spread":0.27954731440493275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402956675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644862,0.00056626066,0.00038349844,0.004246907,0.00004627407,0.00013435306,0.00015138718,0.0000128824595,0.029972376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905449,0.00025541306,0.00039036683,0.0003290399,0.000009633867,0.000017992837,0.000039931423,0.000005118739,0.00840753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941136,0.0012035802,0.00020298216,0.0005031241,0.0018090361,0.002167708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98206127,0.0045594033,0.0016893629,0.0005337266,0.008296008,0.002860262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042754086,0.00020754838,0.0004813872,0.0018659445,0.012930999,0.004646733,0.0021267557,0.001639237,0.0039949603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021945205,0.00029860684,0.0003718256,0.0035667687,0.004779528,0.0013161779,0.0021767416,0.0030908815,0.00016753736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009214058,0.0011364006,0.40299702,0.00063798326,0.00019802767,0.0025327462,0.19894047,0.003726775,0.004194386,0.18668531,0.019256195,0.17877331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009879518,0.0004007231,0.7939902,0.0002753879,0.00016845808,0.00018112978,0.120744966,0.002330834,0.0019420736,0.0031666027,0.07658909,0.00011167078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9828114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99257106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11519709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11519709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17631012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83581734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403010128","doi":"10.3138/9781487560218","title":"Canadian Criminal Law in Ten Cases","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04197789523678117,"score_gpt":0.269140855534661,"score_spread":0.22716296029787983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403010128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00491079,0.009480558,0.00041103878,0.009169136,0.0013357595,0.00010815324,0.0009168217,0.00010225711,0.9735656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12399149,0.02274941,0.0018237481,0.009991367,0.00025032347,0.00011759981,0.0023476712,0.000109693305,0.8386187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980976,0.00009747162,0.000037487738,0.00010253265,0.00091840856,0.0007464729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983639,0.00017304948,0.0000540693,0.00004331021,0.00084078475,0.00052491965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084315677,0.00067266397,0.00026626152,0.004583831,0.014845373,0.0058119805,0.0018934222,0.0019441851,0.020932253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027743222,0.00040338657,0.00058053696,0.005555602,0.004281482,0.001246476,0.002004384,0.0027451015,0.0028218706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014009598,0.000022918215,0.0012267168,0.00011411451,0.0000049032155,0.00059004215,0.0031997857,0.00029286122,0.00013366426,0.20750351,0.73990804,0.04698946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035414832,0.0000034195878,0.0026208814,0.00011325479,0.000004592422,0.00014935383,0.0014491418,0.00009415093,0.000059635742,0.0038771557,0.99160916,0.000015718466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12714459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5606502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403267736","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue09-14","title":"BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THESE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES IN ANGLO-SAXON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Presumption; Burden of proof; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17731804151152897,"score_gpt":0.43609654220686533,"score_spread":0.25877850069533637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403267736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001034784,0.99701166,0.0002509086,0.0008167272,0.00010840048,0.000007904641,0.000012886761,0.0000022073536,0.0016857293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019199249,0.996849,0.00042492867,0.00041445706,0.00014312642,0.000012843879,0.00001767624,0.0000023779485,0.00021569461],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601436,0.0014301253,0.0006370665,0.00030162188,0.00146125,0.00015568393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852857,0.011046941,0.0010844423,0.00023277677,0.0021755002,0.000174587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006946199,0.000894827,0.0017751736,0.0075895535,0.0010346451,0.004687314,0.0012323122,0.002333711,0.0030547844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014955612,0.00081562554,0.00074028264,0.007487502,0.0029881147,0.005188263,0.0017222974,0.0030321563,0.0008335309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039785835,0.00006345638,0.00076340634,0.046980012,0.00018691643,0.0001408173,0.0010353408,0.0009518026,0.0003616041,0.10301599,0.026723264,0.8197376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010286783,0.00010669783,0.004013819,0.07629476,0.00023613324,0.0004168962,0.0006433552,0.0002561433,0.00023713274,0.027838184,0.8898877,0.000058858936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011291087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016764104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011291087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045408667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011931673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036735475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403954946","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5004791","title":"What to Do about the Decay of the Conventions of the Canadian Constitution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.020080256739263003,"score_gpt":0.3190123575640495,"score_spread":0.2989321008247865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403954946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06279026,0.014267801,0.006039613,0.48482707,0.0022594444,0.00007960308,0.0013644624,0.00015481384,0.42821687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92716616,0.005357614,0.002723236,0.028113328,0.0006522902,0.00005443821,0.00038035272,0.00018041003,0.035372123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854735,0.0027505192,0.00030217462,0.0013945702,0.0050784987,0.0050006867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695654,0.0066829184,0.0016388602,0.002559335,0.017137036,0.0024165341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014674648,0.00050220866,0.0009638821,0.0039798897,0.022241797,0.01973502,0.0034840717,0.006145613,0.0150714815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058399435,0.00044819765,0.00069346733,0.005767983,0.050027914,0.016097737,0.003501227,0.010661314,0.0010434695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003892803,0.000009080983,0.0018547558,0.00008196278,0.000026523883,0.00006131146,0.007570525,0.0003747278,0.000102483966,0.9452466,0.028813712,0.01581938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003408477,0.000020540685,0.016128294,0.00074406207,0.00010731249,0.000121649005,0.03104179,0.0009519214,0.0006199214,0.5180967,0.43191,0.00022377673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97899204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13377753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13377753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2087964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97062844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403973737","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5006054","title":"Synopsis - Indefinite Detention Under Part XX.1 of the Criminal Code and Winko v. British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.020443718064620198,"score_gpt":0.28095428259806127,"score_spread":0.26051056453344107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403973737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014859573,0.09798445,0.002106956,0.19843502,0.15200815,0.0017458302,0.018219518,0.0005867227,0.5140538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10028773,0.05880642,0.0013397915,0.35087776,0.030995298,0.0013748966,0.0052883457,0.0002799272,0.45074984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997227,0.00031591617,0.0003480823,0.00027417997,0.001264154,0.0005706146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937784,0.0028472494,0.00037350028,0.00019480645,0.0024142456,0.0003917043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023421138,0.0006730035,0.000838674,0.004087769,0.0054763756,0.0040252297,0.0034335717,0.010585485,0.011329767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076629696,0.0006488087,0.000672572,0.00484201,0.0016180465,0.0012169797,0.0015487818,0.007587927,0.003718185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005735444,0.000024355813,0.0006117644,0.0007985957,0.000014333018,0.00083057804,0.00062830286,0.00017342003,0.0006608325,0.012360632,0.97108823,0.01275145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001783308,0.000036090347,0.0083943475,0.0010740414,0.000023644398,0.00027529805,0.00088020385,0.0000859057,0.00024807834,0.0017477487,0.9871651,0.000051698713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4987615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6997895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50123847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121123735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123955645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404021743","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5007163","title":"&lt;span&gt;Toward a Trauma-informed Approach to Evidence Law: Witness Credibility and Reliability&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Span (engineering); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Law; Political science; Engineering; Structural engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.044395370758889614,"score_gpt":0.3337618910412258,"score_spread":0.28936652028233617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404021743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024053467,0.0064058304,0.22980995,0.5445712,0.0012234746,0.00031280634,0.0004596353,0.00026654816,0.192897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82032436,0.0046232035,0.12338072,0.02187727,0.0011679106,0.0005674311,0.00015669253,0.00028236443,0.02762008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97946006,0.014072138,0.0010032112,0.0013430367,0.0034301511,0.00069142797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84597343,0.11290239,0.009224954,0.00852941,0.019547954,0.0038219145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04276346,0.0005060582,0.0010298785,0.0073349513,0.006014558,0.014277974,0.0033862074,0.007680114,0.018976385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1873614,0.00090807985,0.0006871308,0.0032139535,0.024185868,0.022054037,0.0089042485,0.008440325,0.0019764786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005700909,0.00007386719,0.004422036,0.00020217763,0.00004775045,0.0004104684,0.008494533,0.001271995,0.00036341615,0.85605127,0.03271159,0.09589391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068516806,0.000016429964,0.0024968795,0.0003081907,0.000013213953,0.00018778048,0.0057113925,0.0028416116,0.00034588826,0.97474074,0.013297356,0.000033641252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013138516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01853484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04276346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009655222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104455985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22615749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404021835","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5005205","title":"&lt;span&gt;Judicial Misconduct in the Sexual Assault Trial&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Sexual assault; Misconduct; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Poison control; Engineering; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.041687808377399244,"score_gpt":0.34429651335593775,"score_spread":0.30260870497853853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404021835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13189942,0.006697359,0.0018944812,0.19671562,0.006346371,0.00049709494,0.0021977823,0.0002037817,0.6535481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68765813,0.0026816288,0.0010883817,0.06377689,0.0029234341,0.00068440475,0.00066549523,0.00013591045,0.24038579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374735,0.00221544,0.0004780082,0.0005506872,0.0011521679,0.0018563243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893523,0.0065520243,0.0008016244,0.00044391342,0.0013793729,0.0014707271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076719276,0.00038028474,0.00073706673,0.0023220908,0.011342454,0.003943241,0.002106546,0.023857156,0.038199753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04484403,0.00065288064,0.00070811826,0.0012930053,0.0026290256,0.0031157192,0.0036867405,0.009348318,0.0044630063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060782797,0.0003472217,0.016135572,0.00026629813,0.00009656418,0.008546714,0.0049566017,0.0008482172,0.0008745751,0.23384982,0.6649812,0.0684894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007880018,0.00095260027,0.11053114,0.0024064681,0.0004245895,0.0045693293,0.017720839,0.008528775,0.005842559,0.22127539,0.62653846,0.00042187952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05550903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15933217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05550903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004846888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010659251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12779093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404136825","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4967612","title":"The Rules-Standards Debate and Ontario Civil Procedure Reform: A Case for More Rules?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016289584401450216,"score_gpt":0.3214042181843624,"score_spread":0.30511463378291215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404136825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03983553,0.0038451345,0.0014901287,0.80069137,0.0012265339,0.00011388509,0.0007255111,0.00003903906,0.15203296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.732743,0.0046854503,0.004198541,0.15502505,0.0020095296,0.00022238321,0.0005747321,0.00013982036,0.100401446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660405,0.0072636153,0.0013279312,0.0028934372,0.0141422,0.008332289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92312056,0.028966084,0.004918618,0.0037945474,0.02575184,0.013448325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02736544,0.00045618173,0.001170544,0.0023025014,0.018260328,0.016976992,0.004489753,0.01775886,0.017013334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08464862,0.00090768543,0.0012886346,0.0040922672,0.022959372,0.010068943,0.006001061,0.015759172,0.0008020599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026423734,0.00012135151,0.008584743,0.0003026779,0.000093465336,0.00019784179,0.006543906,0.0015657538,0.00033303234,0.83717114,0.11749265,0.027329234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006553352,0.00013333804,0.0776756,0.0012252285,0.00021485925,0.00009891393,0.013710107,0.002283598,0.0007765384,0.24165155,0.66117,0.00040487162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99006224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17535274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17535274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3381637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95647395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404297544","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4980786","title":"Mirroring &lt;i&gt;Mens Rea&lt;/i&gt;: The \"Two Pathways to Conviction\" Argument in Canadian Sexual Assault Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Argument (complex analysis); Mirroring; Mens rea; Sexual assault; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.023364901047795435,"score_gpt":0.2977568247208122,"score_spread":0.2743919236730168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404297544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105445795,0.0030125135,0.0042473935,0.36723888,0.00076315436,0.00018060039,0.0008559256,0.000060596212,0.5181953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94458926,0.0015244023,0.0010542644,0.01651903,0.0002005696,0.000044755645,0.00009992094,0.000051019095,0.035916794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312603,0.0010110735,0.00017832113,0.00061242445,0.0021599485,0.0029122026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851436,0.0051879147,0.0006861864,0.00045014767,0.0037925057,0.0013689696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006314511,0.0005795272,0.0006234008,0.0031996516,0.019335233,0.012697498,0.0037398043,0.012369498,0.031054359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039970428,0.00064487563,0.00089922105,0.0031403778,0.020054441,0.0071617914,0.004183807,0.014051467,0.0009438687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053639542,0.000026283215,0.0032358426,0.00006241308,0.000017476415,0.0002349735,0.004083605,0.00029009845,0.000085410975,0.95700204,0.02418628,0.010721864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043030726,0.00006176727,0.044307657,0.0010455295,0.00045262944,0.0004899983,0.053875636,0.0058791135,0.0017690648,0.71068627,0.1806737,0.0003283642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0927312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0927312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20361273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6728151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404307780","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5019889","title":"Unveiling the Truth: Admissibility of Truth Serum Tests in Indian Legal Proceedings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Post truth; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.01764163506431544,"score_gpt":0.32601901384980186,"score_spread":0.30837737878548643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404307780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5113006,0.010923506,0.07169234,0.2497527,0.0025766592,0.00048067913,0.0010244963,0.00028643134,0.1519625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98813105,0.0004065467,0.0054876506,0.004365727,0.0003778602,0.000051663945,0.00005307131,0.000014419669,0.0011119494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9192543,0.045923386,0.0066153514,0.0059349188,0.017233009,0.0050390307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5004331,0.4198551,0.026173333,0.024355978,0.024749804,0.004432631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10997366,0.00048647582,0.0013275847,0.0054635457,0.005062832,0.010983348,0.0054361443,0.009021614,0.00409356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46943521,0.0006554186,0.0012495344,0.0028452615,0.019816862,0.012389093,0.006107632,0.012684587,0.00051253045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012502675,0.0002453218,0.073007315,0.00066126755,0.00023337732,0.0023724504,0.01084788,0.002178965,0.0009581194,0.7914983,0.011382117,0.105364576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015605183,0.0005595185,0.02764997,0.0012137773,0.0006487772,0.004344199,0.00798349,0.016620597,0.0056416215,0.9052164,0.029790409,0.00017508773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007195215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068643237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10997366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004748286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011683211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5816033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404325138","doi":"10.1080/08003831.2024.2410113","title":"Exercising rights over data: a journey towards First Nations data sovereignty in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Borealia","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.11662473458262486,"score_gpt":0.3764881373423983,"score_spread":0.25986340275977343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404325138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14996572,0.028319877,0.0055660047,0.5227871,0.001288988,0.00019517413,0.0006051381,0.00008702823,0.29118505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067444,0.021582793,0.005069227,0.03468855,0.0001256534,0.00007820829,0.00028275762,0.00006897988,0.031359512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97567016,0.0048980997,0.0006787622,0.0014855153,0.010011319,0.0072562154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593354,0.018454453,0.0013826467,0.0015120475,0.012228072,0.007087392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017687203,0.0003690161,0.0006924793,0.0028656214,0.049575765,0.028784815,0.003192852,0.005201464,0.00445966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036373958,0.0006293698,0.0005403715,0.0068366253,0.03528162,0.009549991,0.011237401,0.013220221,0.0003005579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003233863,0.000043106313,0.005781014,0.00033253746,0.000029686918,0.0011336127,0.10065037,0.0005169976,0.0002364791,0.80892366,0.041362666,0.040957488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022413582,0.000033763583,0.015529367,0.0021123413,0.00004690543,0.0004210183,0.1601496,0.000976738,0.0007525926,0.075886354,0.743857,0.0002119625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99679536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95042425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23345174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5289684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8890873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469161","doi":"10.29173/alr2788","title":"Principled Justice for Indigenous Peoples? An Empirical Analysis of the Application of Gladue Factors in Canadian Lower Courts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04345932600342585,"score_gpt":0.39547253393137005,"score_spread":0.3520132079279442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963365,0.00090041594,0.00027081952,0.003618487,0.000026260082,0.00010268373,0.00011255327,0.0000040468717,0.031599674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811363,0.00044629734,0.00016675514,0.00028468226,0.000005498295,0.0000110256415,0.000026428539,0.000002255089,0.00094341044],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98795575,0.0018785544,0.00029478202,0.0008491774,0.0058710594,0.0031507139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825959,0.0053989217,0.0034726996,0.00084047666,0.005616025,0.0020759578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008479945,0.00026658765,0.0004906932,0.0037996324,0.014986003,0.004508215,0.0021130445,0.0013342401,0.0032368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04813545,0.0003328793,0.00031365053,0.0050723427,0.009978971,0.0022166248,0.0034138202,0.0026146353,0.00013116955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018720214,0.0003831818,0.3934567,0.000491744,0.00016128487,0.0009795557,0.40743193,0.00057129323,0.00087845535,0.07615175,0.0069682603,0.11233864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020108022,0.00005607498,0.763965,0.0004983266,0.000080375416,0.00013279625,0.20707232,0.0005848755,0.00021542032,0.0033851566,0.023922501,0.00006689226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98523533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06735614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06735614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089134574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48870528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696590","doi":"10.7202/1114751ar","title":"L’accompagnement des personnes victimes lors d’entrevues sur les faits au Québec : pratique ou droit ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07283077099402628,"score_gpt":0.3271521683299568,"score_spread":0.2543213973359305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5871767,0.016545726,0.005249917,0.2180998,0.002595577,0.00022565025,0.00042536287,0.00019725233,0.16948403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8950112,0.0108857,0.0019934108,0.013641979,0.00032652254,0.00009953177,0.00016972472,0.00007551202,0.07779651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960336,0.00147533,0.00009753479,0.00029397814,0.0009819507,0.0011176188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226815,0.0011187709,0.00091551995,0.0003304946,0.0033475137,0.0020195323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034622108,0.00047584888,0.00048032586,0.0010281041,0.016665524,0.005415459,0.001766342,0.0029413917,0.015549778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011505822,0.00036353065,0.00036733068,0.0009621159,0.007947023,0.0033430434,0.0035627529,0.004908712,0.0016040854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011126856,0.00021995066,0.08881598,0.0006984886,0.00007937518,0.0051178853,0.58292085,0.00031883593,0.0020615598,0.034515493,0.088182606,0.19695762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001433971,0.00015827121,0.07123929,0.0015822491,0.000062768246,0.0022572058,0.5973821,0.00037495093,0.00068153744,0.0032083995,0.32290292,0.00013596527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8304949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91947204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16950512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01998734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040610794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3410067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696846","doi":"10.7202/1114754ar","title":"Return to <i>Smith</i>? Harper-Era Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canadian Courts (2008–2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Charter; Judicial deference; Jurisdiction; Political science; Discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.036966572389436986,"score_gpt":0.34042043962415347,"score_spread":0.30345386723471646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29828745,0.020108156,0.0016576316,0.2300274,0.0041266475,0.0004095215,0.022627486,0.00044575828,0.4223099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7580532,0.008813879,0.0029969504,0.0759424,0.00059449015,0.00014606686,0.0048075723,0.0002092265,0.14843619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430484,0.00018426645,0.00012949195,0.00043537884,0.0026043155,0.002341719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058187,0.0007674306,0.00042889445,0.00027187518,0.006309285,0.00164062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003705381,0.0003296492,0.00031755542,0.002530577,0.013697167,0.0054659247,0.0019808712,0.0034049302,0.0064879563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012486577,0.00047043458,0.00079981226,0.0031289598,0.0027124987,0.001324519,0.001435286,0.0043775,0.00074484583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111233334,0.00007421102,0.040588137,0.00029162358,0.00006634348,0.001499962,0.015401183,0.0007678658,0.0015939876,0.12395478,0.74330527,0.07234546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561181,0.00003843441,0.22023925,0.0005981317,0.00006713476,0.00037582766,0.0076082502,0.00058250787,0.0011536207,0.00302472,0.7660629,0.00021350791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99807966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99944264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13820125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13820125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21562926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405001101","doi":"10.1515/9780776636429-008","title":"CHAPTER A-5 Pandemic Data Sharing: How the Canadian Constitution Has Turned into a Suicide Pact","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pact; Constitution; Pandemic; Data sharing; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.24028348415686115,"score_gpt":0.29753483751487986,"score_spread":0.0572513533580187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405001101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003685235,0.027301896,0.0024595344,0.15561323,0.004558693,0.000097354976,0.00056281395,0.00013641197,0.80558485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15341423,0.024017625,0.005233953,0.08782371,0.0013042206,0.00011349158,0.00047586355,0.0003161617,0.7273007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954099,0.0007112289,0.00007567104,0.00033536993,0.0024862164,0.0009815987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615735,0.0010748283,0.00007474019,0.00020620335,0.0019475836,0.0005393043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004626149,0.0006446347,0.00032217163,0.0026417607,0.026727485,0.018696725,0.002699978,0.006602154,0.013564758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008347426,0.00046737146,0.00055765786,0.0044748075,0.01646589,0.0046957107,0.0025353634,0.0076713907,0.0020124153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046184146,0.000006621759,0.00021964549,0.00004071543,0.0000030573578,0.0001093404,0.0032587214,0.00016534644,0.000055522734,0.68233925,0.29822,0.015577252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031787777,0.0000034101647,0.0006212951,0.00022057907,0.0000057196453,0.000070677605,0.0025703658,0.00020068175,0.00009099858,0.03723194,0.95895594,0.000025100235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97220683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89188796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10811205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15954109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7844115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405001236","doi":"10.59962/9780774869980","title":"The Independence of the Prosecutor","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019451198429000713,"score_gpt":0.22218170377015428,"score_spread":0.20273050534115356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405001236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025682436,0.003467241,0.018000213,0.022004802,0.0016841056,0.00024283116,0.0001889015,0.0002194056,0.92851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6852598,0.0028554325,0.016977454,0.014473389,0.0012618443,0.0005824018,0.00031631225,0.00031600203,0.27795723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99074966,0.0029836765,0.000658412,0.0015745942,0.0026430355,0.0013906589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98126924,0.006666011,0.00095540535,0.003881555,0.0049127154,0.002315001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007331754,0.0002499226,0.00052565295,0.0014557545,0.0062538204,0.008211957,0.0013585291,0.002830035,0.00873791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018003138,0.00066234736,0.0004555729,0.0012211202,0.0075270096,0.0043117185,0.0064306427,0.012790187,0.005574681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010721747,0.000057919966,0.0026478325,0.0001577843,0.000014574353,0.00071631075,0.014106132,0.0002213614,0.0021014216,0.8382757,0.065040804,0.07655292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050702714,0.00012374592,0.004607079,0.0009315763,0.000051645817,0.0009960482,0.00488376,0.00057491683,0.0029190492,0.050522946,0.93427765,0.000060890685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006313539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011174279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00873791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003830671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011798723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03877449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405189789","doi":"10.7202/1114914ar","title":"La quérulence ou la manie des procédures : une vision québécoise","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014270447051653326,"score_gpt":0.2685174177141623,"score_spread":0.254246970662509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405189789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051833943,0.10836187,0.02673464,0.303381,0.005598581,0.0001383949,0.00042633613,0.00020733793,0.5033179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599255,0.041785315,0.010311342,0.03615783,0.0018489836,0.00015267315,0.00018040318,0.00019148023,0.14944655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930443,0.002287908,0.00018475454,0.0007729625,0.0027318888,0.000978089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307466,0.0025549543,0.00056736846,0.000568579,0.0024145683,0.00081987784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005720654,0.00067097205,0.00066696893,0.0034030057,0.010573346,0.010356669,0.002306977,0.0065361187,0.006903479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011417947,0.00041773386,0.00054551836,0.002556187,0.037515823,0.0055233217,0.0028099166,0.00845568,0.0005211234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040256054,0.000018022018,0.0018598117,0.00012434233,0.000014020151,0.00024469063,0.016475055,0.00026241757,0.00042554343,0.8927017,0.028277948,0.059556227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017706641,0.00007161116,0.00992709,0.0012616722,0.000035470217,0.0003986501,0.011991396,0.00084561715,0.0005194337,0.08136878,0.89344597,0.00011660133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8948431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91564816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1051569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056441557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074205816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40951413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190042","doi":"10.7202/1114912ar","title":"Les controverses jurisprudentielles administratives et la persistance de l’arrêt <i>Domtar </i>: quelle suite ?","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017221823753380716,"score_gpt":0.2970952891125175,"score_spread":0.27987346535913676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043129522,0.024610074,0.012410739,0.68382585,0.0013575112,0.00006649588,0.00019266103,0.00006105259,0.23434605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712801,0.011424543,0.004970439,0.061525904,0.0011338296,0.00009189141,0.00008948291,0.0000924389,0.04939153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700112,0.009630748,0.0010203201,0.003225232,0.010871651,0.005240965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570172,0.023296703,0.002965235,0.0025726808,0.011982661,0.0021656232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030341934,0.00037808728,0.00094621244,0.00302077,0.020180477,0.03088959,0.0042365794,0.008991303,0.006196648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044840775,0.0005425383,0.00081186707,0.0037211622,0.053949136,0.009481731,0.005528942,0.015822185,0.00080310536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010275823,0.000009777955,0.00088239636,0.000052676398,0.000012518903,0.000066936846,0.0075435676,0.00009671151,0.00010357795,0.97708863,0.007898348,0.006234543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049293914,0.0000450521,0.008758079,0.0009721714,0.000065773915,0.00017935217,0.04024806,0.0007207095,0.0014878223,0.41530234,0.5320143,0.00015698341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5960999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7049994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4039001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07590603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110310234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81255746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405375266","doi":"10.21257/sg.268","title":"La qualité de victime en matière climatique selon la CourEDH","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"sui generis","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Thetford","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02437061525450331,"score_gpt":0.35913880558412303,"score_spread":0.33476819032961974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405375266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7148309,0.006981825,0.0014220317,0.039435323,0.0007257488,0.000092290175,0.0021808655,0.00015072287,0.23418039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91745746,0.002439034,0.0003237632,0.002094767,0.00013105222,0.00007427882,0.00033938314,0.000051980343,0.07708836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963349,0.0011462434,0.00012411889,0.0003406285,0.001092212,0.00096183835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442816,0.0010946608,0.0015108516,0.00026436112,0.0013130174,0.0013889597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025743344,0.00021861382,0.00041080118,0.0014986115,0.00541399,0.005364067,0.00081066537,0.0010554604,0.0384243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009032047,0.00024834016,0.00044239237,0.0020190869,0.0036442617,0.0028209947,0.0044310996,0.002084942,0.0042693755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021066968,0.00015027716,0.38087848,0.00047493732,0.00012203997,0.0015817827,0.3257912,0.0004215057,0.0009980509,0.085168146,0.072170764,0.132032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009112984,0.00019495815,0.52351475,0.0007586562,0.000035470097,0.0008582324,0.17330487,0.00023870012,0.000540842,0.0036567193,0.29677743,0.00011029074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06443041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10926868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06443041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038660476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004045356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.128542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405465103","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5059519","title":"Book review: Colton Fehr, Constitutionalizing Criminal Law (UBC Press, 2022)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03039932922715176,"score_gpt":0.3441544643674382,"score_spread":0.3137551351402864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405465103","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001366693,0.7908313,0.0005488802,0.074407436,0.07992791,0.000064203676,0.0015156072,0.0001793935,0.05238861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026233802,0.51287824,0.0007208141,0.04208129,0.052837655,0.00016351296,0.0017859335,0.00027227635,0.38663685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881446,0.0001780623,0.00006864311,0.00018929054,0.00064636656,0.000103097605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721766,0.0010782132,0.00016624168,0.00010810755,0.0011638951,0.00026583337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012527788,0.0017992578,0.0021664207,0.008676166,0.0013656281,0.005096302,0.002096601,0.0052659055,0.0814629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060730595,0.0007656388,0.00056663697,0.012397263,0.0014578535,0.0038138668,0.0022970834,0.003781762,0.06054377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004744064,0.0000025969134,0.000010657341,0.00022261291,0.0000025830125,0.000006127939,0.00000725485,0.000018544539,0.000010555231,0.0005032031,0.979123,0.020088226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007853057,0.0000042567854,0.0001343406,0.00065667706,0.0000091377915,0.00003662137,0.000018049588,0.000020665595,0.000019185469,0.0009954763,0.99809116,0.0000065731865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023228263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06419703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0814629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052988306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00618222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27252054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405487500","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5038145","title":"The rules-standards debate and Ontario Civil Procedure reform: a case for more rules?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.016289584401450216,"score_gpt":0.3214042181843624,"score_spread":0.30511463378291215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405487500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03983553,0.0038451345,0.0014901287,0.80069137,0.0012265339,0.00011388509,0.0007255111,0.00003903906,0.15203296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.732743,0.0046854503,0.004198541,0.15502505,0.0020095296,0.00022238321,0.0005747321,0.00013982036,0.100401446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660405,0.0072636153,0.0013279312,0.0028934372,0.0141422,0.008332289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92312056,0.028966084,0.004918618,0.0037945474,0.02575184,0.013448325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02736544,0.00045618173,0.001170544,0.0023025014,0.018260328,0.016976992,0.004489753,0.01775886,0.017013334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08464862,0.00090768543,0.0012886346,0.0040922672,0.022959372,0.010068943,0.006001061,0.015759172,0.0008020599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026423734,0.00012135151,0.008584743,0.0003026779,0.000093465336,0.00019784179,0.006543906,0.0015657538,0.00033303234,0.83717114,0.11749265,0.027329234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006553352,0.00013333804,0.0776756,0.0012252285,0.00021485925,0.00009891393,0.013710107,0.002283598,0.0007765384,0.24165155,0.66117,0.00040487162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99006224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17535274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17535274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3381637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95647395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405588948","doi":"10.7202/1115109ar","title":"Relic of a Bygone Era? A Comparative Review of the Defence of “Reasonable Correction” in Canadian and Israeli Criminal Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Criminal code; Jurisdiction; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Dignity; High Court; Criminal law","score_opus":0.06197593593849592,"score_gpt":0.357827525335634,"score_spread":0.29585158939713807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405588948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017743443,0.99727637,0.000014136751,0.000847599,0.000062550476,0.0000037265538,0.000022722612,7.7202407e-7,0.001594815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004402255,0.9948614,0.000047321726,0.0004475962,0.00006046835,0.000005147206,0.0000218532,0.0000013877849,0.00015251111],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996278,0.0010175663,0.00034262045,0.00032524037,0.0017293546,0.00030715272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98834723,0.0068081156,0.0009352468,0.00017133645,0.0033869618,0.0003510649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056326874,0.0008656028,0.0019725817,0.016112639,0.0021952123,0.0053765397,0.0016121538,0.0020787427,0.0041446765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01623277,0.0006234055,0.0007039962,0.029138997,0.0065806136,0.0025809878,0.0013855399,0.0023395435,0.00042016225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017763134,0.00006890579,0.0017296297,0.1250491,0.0005093149,0.00024739784,0.004804078,0.0003157058,0.00032739431,0.05371891,0.0480277,0.7650242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036698093,0.00008949384,0.015407855,0.12620683,0.00062594656,0.00039982563,0.004174575,0.000075814074,0.0002466903,0.0041343356,0.84852064,0.000081340506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7354177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87499624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26458228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036641918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09024125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5322809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405596258","doi":"10.2307/jj.22247014.15","title":"Saskatchewan Penitentiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03250919055961949,"score_gpt":0.24054436972596713,"score_spread":0.20803517916634764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405596258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032995846,0.0023609893,0.0005511627,0.0026517496,0.00049957074,0.00011262461,0.0035236673,0.0001543353,0.9571501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01974074,0.0007932044,0.0002846756,0.00035642734,0.0000074006452,0.000043213942,0.0006670517,0.00004312625,0.9780642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957997,0.000030060322,0.0000148679155,0.00008016536,0.00010813829,0.00018676977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997002,0.000040465635,0.00001289935,0.000040921983,0.00013059875,0.00007492535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024033288,0.00070372055,0.00033673106,0.0009849829,0.0062198243,0.0033370736,0.0011209815,0.0009231424,0.19423932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000613886,0.00059883227,0.00034243526,0.0025048985,0.0009441683,0.0010676993,0.0021428608,0.0018599728,0.030261217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003573081,0.00019861378,0.0120862955,0.00039403126,0.000059926566,0.0029959471,0.0071480884,0.0006458123,0.005130936,0.1561431,0.4970306,0.3178094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015230355,0.000031690848,0.012014653,0.00013614079,0.000010708067,0.00019091878,0.0033729153,0.00012628123,0.0006782377,0.0014711214,0.98192745,0.00002460767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6541375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9450256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3458625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012328851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022676539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6957987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405970048","doi":"10.29173/wclawr120","title":"Wrongful Convictions and Prosecutions in Latin America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Latin Americans; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04359108180642501,"score_gpt":0.3651545631520995,"score_spread":0.3215634813456745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405970048","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024778822,0.93040216,0.000836957,0.024315862,0.0012042242,0.00008245876,0.000553494,0.000028680968,0.017797412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19596325,0.794397,0.0013370311,0.00516295,0.0009809384,0.00019712954,0.0005804396,0.00003169635,0.0013495985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775224,0.012789273,0.0033481,0.0011416479,0.004375673,0.0008229455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88005847,0.087201506,0.018273044,0.0017175539,0.011421334,0.0013281452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026298478,0.0005189209,0.0012617649,0.022561485,0.0026913811,0.007811567,0.0013409283,0.00195707,0.0035837507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100773364,0.00040145734,0.0011358843,0.026173238,0.0045140246,0.00422001,0.0041279593,0.001894411,0.0003533793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023766888,0.000114603325,0.05731301,0.14146839,0.0010247496,0.002373872,0.054372452,0.0005411488,0.00054145337,0.07029509,0.03959528,0.6321223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000528565,0.00013950624,0.06534235,0.41899693,0.0011347182,0.0019984178,0.078744344,0.00022527656,0.0005556237,0.013709563,0.41900244,0.00009792107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014997276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022088941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026298478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006037227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026872905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1390813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406144377","doi":"10.59992/ijlrs.2024.v3n6p1","title":"The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in Canadian law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Majallah al-dawlīyah lil-buḥūth wa-al-dirāsāt al-qānūnīyah =","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Rules of evidence; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04245483583098457,"score_gpt":0.34638967081809247,"score_spread":0.3039348349871079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406144377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05407502,0.0067566335,0.041603297,0.049346544,0.00072410813,0.00041432006,0.00073532463,0.00011907465,0.8462257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88583803,0.004743064,0.0316134,0.009277492,0.00038863177,0.00021211331,0.00035499368,0.00008569106,0.06748663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9575563,0.00623825,0.0026590982,0.0046660616,0.024196368,0.004683828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936481,0.022594934,0.0043548495,0.00541017,0.028063858,0.003095295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019954024,0.0006169304,0.0013778612,0.006858943,0.023042647,0.022654926,0.0034970385,0.0054573203,0.00934683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06784643,0.0011714179,0.0014298708,0.00815856,0.03426129,0.007898611,0.0066673583,0.010341769,0.0009857288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015740772,0.000010849677,0.0015343581,0.00009070984,0.000014046753,0.00023769999,0.0046268385,0.00027515786,0.000112141766,0.9798537,0.004373527,0.008855135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086315464,0.00004228206,0.01196675,0.0014644418,0.00021842113,0.000509903,0.0068932693,0.0049985177,0.0011722553,0.596366,0.3759883,0.00029356033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93605816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9533162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09735378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09735378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2066132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7063544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406310853","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9185","title":"No-Fault, Motor Vehicle Accidents, and The Civil Resolution Tribunal: Effective Justice or False Prophet?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Fault (geology); Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Seismology; Geology","score_opus":0.03893748772347299,"score_gpt":0.3611627251944742,"score_spread":0.3222252374710012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406310853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4242449,0.006345298,0.0057701943,0.27803633,0.0010118763,0.00004854926,0.000082777944,0.000033254546,0.2844268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847733,0.0006627545,0.00043547963,0.007917105,0.00013061447,0.000014182861,0.000013055502,0.00001734823,0.006036072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842569,0.0060405983,0.0003874518,0.000998444,0.004050057,0.004266533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98848397,0.005214973,0.0017981827,0.00095895166,0.0015826242,0.001961259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008135648,0.0002302787,0.00038248784,0.0016585902,0.022195956,0.020223051,0.0020979224,0.0043540024,0.0061083357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029817203,0.00029230354,0.00019687937,0.0021840886,0.055419385,0.015705308,0.009516726,0.0073123216,0.0004213951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030412055,0.000052377254,0.0068241074,0.00005941129,0.0000125566185,0.00038002583,0.105564065,0.00018131876,0.00011742219,0.8329071,0.016432285,0.037438974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010795725,0.00005291742,0.018488448,0.0005768088,0.000018651257,0.00033276918,0.5792051,0.000436513,0.00023190748,0.21695642,0.18360448,0.00008513372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1114881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19775625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98238635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01761362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018644253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22167832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406323765","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9017","title":"Introduction: Harnessing the Untapped Potential of the Canadian Charter/Réaliser le potentiel inexploité de la Charte canadienne","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.026606116428856158,"score_gpt":0.2964037499439292,"score_spread":0.269797633515073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406323765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047833663,0.024214098,0.0029134636,0.2807006,0.012750025,0.00016991579,0.0045846975,0.00036931632,0.6695145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17030706,0.05433135,0.014120343,0.07638798,0.0060222624,0.000179755,0.003145156,0.0006424935,0.67486364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297225,0.00049644243,0.000097568205,0.00055053405,0.004603092,0.0012801045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925931,0.00098217,0.000184195,0.0003044744,0.0045533474,0.0013826448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004290291,0.00070597586,0.00035104263,0.0034039307,0.009912556,0.014574851,0.0018600632,0.0040546306,0.05830954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011391388,0.00035186068,0.00053385587,0.0046239514,0.007075544,0.0038770188,0.0033024303,0.0050551323,0.0050007943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013355332,0.0000097603715,0.00079297513,0.00021753258,0.0000055587943,0.00008511366,0.001836952,0.0002644428,0.00017895109,0.23707293,0.7116398,0.047882702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014674083,0.0000027177932,0.0012513802,0.00021891046,0.0000028706138,0.000019947056,0.00066908833,0.000059471964,0.00005188459,0.0035843363,0.99411964,0.000018403727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9781503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0760991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0760991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18699792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5521402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326532","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9067","title":"Un rond dans un carré: l’expérience professionnelle des spécialistes de la justice réparatrice dans le cadre d’un programme québécois de déjudiciarisation pour adultes","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04081260786727914,"score_gpt":0.34879418418495695,"score_spread":0.3079815763176778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118392,0.00485691,0.0020475283,0.035147127,0.0004634562,0.00010836962,0.00014685624,0.000032994805,0.04535744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97089875,0.0016701642,0.00069411844,0.0047939117,0.00004924424,0.00007374986,0.0000577514,0.00003936471,0.021723043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900034,0.0058226795,0.00018013685,0.0006732461,0.0016425479,0.001678006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913731,0.0026630124,0.0007043305,0.00026469986,0.0023461413,0.0026487047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007071023,0.00029481403,0.00054220256,0.0011104033,0.020684697,0.006678364,0.0010971046,0.0022167957,0.0066988766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011148871,0.0004851364,0.0003156514,0.0014370929,0.016402086,0.004942352,0.0056940946,0.004575067,0.0007897456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024955796,0.000025608591,0.0047933254,0.00007628627,0.000004280482,0.00030101993,0.9772689,0.000024193687,0.0002936937,0.0033319697,0.004656609,0.009199149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046905498,0.00006301723,0.012458341,0.00036709633,0.000007156062,0.00018328194,0.9146929,0.00005509749,0.00013871945,0.0004148788,0.07158293,0.000031899755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8199012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35065693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026697015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0340647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.705444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406981158","doi":"10.1525/collabra.127729","title":"Harm Is Key to Judgments That Stealing Is Immoral","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collabra Psychology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Key (lock); Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10823863255613063,"score_gpt":0.4681381670086949,"score_spread":0.3598995344525643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406981158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814187,0.00015778797,0.0012262557,0.001069857,0.00003255524,0.000058167312,0.000037745438,0.000013410019,0.01598556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833626,0.00007971462,0.00085129373,0.000300849,0.0000139930935,0.000016637729,0.00004717533,0.000005530658,0.00034863868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912661,0.0043575517,0.0005983477,0.0007138734,0.002584962,0.0004791778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484673,0.018435868,0.021546206,0.004029211,0.0051993723,0.002322059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065166987,0.00036639025,0.0004213646,0.0015094251,0.0014371147,0.0032006616,0.00046384038,0.001958542,0.0031999908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065944105,0.00041078372,0.00039780865,0.0005901862,0.005125268,0.003275938,0.0022097477,0.0026808684,0.00033156775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002305826,0.0015697441,0.7733858,0.00057998,0.00031220246,0.0009493923,0.10363168,0.00071936386,0.021139853,0.020956201,0.0023701503,0.07207981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006207959,0.0007212043,0.90535986,0.00032149683,0.00012490759,0.0010553396,0.053927563,0.0013628107,0.0044931,0.02525081,0.007174444,0.00014632368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002783657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051800567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065166987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012176132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089342816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407032580","doi":"10.17159/wh71jh46","title":"DOUBLE INCHOATE CRIMES: SERVING A USEFUL PURPOSE OR DOUBLE TROUBLE? Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Law; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05560598496038626,"score_gpt":0.3316085947277179,"score_spread":0.27600260976733165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407032580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035540145,0.027302084,0.0008522766,0.46562257,0.0024434137,0.00014979718,0.00062952493,0.000074208176,0.46738604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.289031,0.011255152,0.0012556616,0.42158812,0.0009684427,0.00013722111,0.00019914494,0.00007152323,0.27549377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688405,0.00032242932,0.00008889752,0.0002856857,0.000989286,0.0014295748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.00070891966,0.00015122876,0.00006161054,0.0007987171,0.0006287266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016871908,0.0005561676,0.00034732049,0.0008147637,0.012681595,0.007089051,0.0017893269,0.012610175,0.0071043484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006250402,0.00051845366,0.00032508388,0.00079048413,0.006473777,0.0021370049,0.0023365505,0.007899336,0.000895099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003236195,0.000031944226,0.0050352956,0.00012452793,0.000012343265,0.0011357081,0.006541466,0.000091476766,0.00025136757,0.26071438,0.70782626,0.01820297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080914986,0.000045773024,0.015542071,0.0012106479,0.0000808882,0.00096047553,0.021574292,0.000495429,0.00073559175,0.026511395,0.93263245,0.00013006906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88852704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111472964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021046204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0587548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22425884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407363729","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5115311","title":"Who Holds the Keys? Section 473 and the Prosecutor's Gatekeeper Role in Canadian Murder Trials","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Criminology; Law; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.013071561637972873,"score_gpt":0.3139514537365709,"score_spread":0.30087989209859806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407363729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3911486,0.011153404,0.00083988474,0.24867219,0.0012006088,0.00012374857,0.000610433,0.00003428802,0.34621686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95396423,0.0031765415,0.00026178293,0.019455172,0.00015851052,0.000029300532,0.000077694494,0.000043557855,0.02283324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796274,0.0029731514,0.00059036666,0.0010914757,0.0040017376,0.0117159905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96241736,0.015890542,0.0032561321,0.0005836966,0.009401254,0.008451018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017604455,0.0003534905,0.00083135464,0.0023028518,0.029755672,0.012815216,0.0035353652,0.010694893,0.013695171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09114004,0.0008965228,0.0005687076,0.0040016538,0.012055693,0.005436562,0.0039727795,0.011325815,0.001152083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001135089,0.0002602794,0.12482034,0.00042661664,0.00015776984,0.0040468,0.11100888,0.0011502524,0.00082268124,0.40492252,0.26272637,0.08852244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023862967,0.00018409664,0.3037743,0.0028331368,0.0005885859,0.0015123831,0.2977638,0.0014453123,0.0012871257,0.05764425,0.33201572,0.00071272854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11983111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11983111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25235027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407875552","doi":"10.5771/9780810881037-97","title":"Appendix E: Ponemon Institute / Information Privacy Commissioner of Ontario Corporate Privacy Comparisons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Computer security; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10363709070819088,"score_gpt":0.2787781041707814,"score_spread":0.17514101346259053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407875552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002102668,0.0015582397,0.0010136667,0.007134164,0.0019299933,0.00089367764,0.075112276,0.00046349855,0.9097918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011366376,0.00079764426,0.0016536338,0.0016688396,0.00023676225,0.00038991423,0.014110827,0.0002881293,0.96948785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963523,0.0002912294,0.0001781384,0.00034182498,0.0023280506,0.0005084018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858766,0.0023712583,0.00044924158,0.00085998233,0.00964415,0.00079886656],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030602016,0.0005548095,0.00070223334,0.0066168997,0.0055742795,0.0038932336,0.0018100869,0.002493885,0.3981095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017193187,0.0006920149,0.00042208136,0.012169258,0.0010870456,0.0027777187,0.0013642041,0.0017108618,0.08552461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015251988,0.000009469922,0.00017788724,0.00004318424,7.928751e-7,0.000013597093,0.00016458219,0.000016784423,0.000030836556,0.004805338,0.98705417,0.0076681473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014130202,0.0000065308577,0.004697361,0.00008949907,0.000003151864,0.00001925198,0.00034966,0.00003168568,0.00008714971,0.0011190976,0.9935703,0.000012168477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75119966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8500432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3981095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031376112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032629494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8585237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932888","doi":"10.21991/cf29483","title":"Negating Positive Rights: A Note on Mathur v Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01889805905399201,"score_gpt":0.3111670329715735,"score_spread":0.2922689739175815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032665174,0.0051225876,0.0019971076,0.34066823,0.0023944161,0.00019302801,0.0005478119,0.00005497889,0.6163567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4850955,0.005549156,0.003432079,0.2894419,0.0019178714,0.00027439787,0.00021268548,0.00010706959,0.2139694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479337,0.0014871628,0.00056729437,0.0014374973,0.008749816,0.0029648922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426985,0.0027416206,0.00029203985,0.00026411924,0.0017922533,0.0006401211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006924826,0.0005328128,0.0006357009,0.0011527707,0.020712234,0.009514177,0.003800401,0.015481016,0.0045202943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014990298,0.00091283204,0.0009452781,0.0011537793,0.015617955,0.004378186,0.003751507,0.011950328,0.00071144657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055818855,0.000022146893,0.0024489493,0.000117509866,0.000029395711,0.0012278433,0.010174905,0.00017296718,0.00094578153,0.8227072,0.15198618,0.010111328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010023688,0.000051185056,0.006101145,0.00050547696,0.0001373941,0.00039045312,0.0076422663,0.00039638104,0.0015764898,0.0696029,0.9132664,0.00022966585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9475461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06722401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09355193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4877466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407941842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5151429","title":"Irrelevant and Invasive Police Inquisitions Into the Sexual History of Sexual Assault Complainants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Sexual history; Psychology; History; Medicine; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.024372074015359336,"score_gpt":0.3170149604945873,"score_spread":0.2926428864792279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407941842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902076,0.0007546011,0.000247245,0.0005192065,0.000029780966,0.000039085906,0.00032065928,0.0000027303684,0.007879199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855787,0.00045950693,0.00009511436,0.000115892835,0.00003568949,0.000009620097,0.00014002454,0.0000029509297,0.00058338826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956052,0.002234276,0.0006454551,0.00023106865,0.00084477325,0.0004392241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95934856,0.021902999,0.010810152,0.003115713,0.0032121676,0.0016103867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038851833,0.00022436054,0.00021609277,0.0030768143,0.0013724249,0.0012853091,0.00062766793,0.00073358475,0.002436496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08067563,0.0003189076,0.00018549616,0.0017203761,0.0014085256,0.002052034,0.0020960583,0.001436739,0.00023455117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012705285,0.00027556304,0.9408775,0.0002040942,0.00005962982,0.0017888077,0.02543233,0.000107589985,0.0011109894,0.0028271822,0.00072533987,0.025320318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079277,0.00020029099,0.9713821,0.00019184028,0.00007253463,0.0020110107,0.020111402,0.00023930485,0.0012253687,0.001481704,0.0030517234,0.0000247823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070454674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0144305285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070454674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006675069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014986607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020547032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407968524","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5153998","title":"The Puzzle and Promise of Human Dignity: R v Bissonnette","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013831293519551925,"score_gpt":0.33014680202469926,"score_spread":0.31631550850514734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407968524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066255464,0.016095597,0.00047770425,0.9586524,0.012535059,0.000013816384,0.000026910267,0.000019478688,0.011516571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040348444,0.01977196,0.0011380025,0.8986217,0.020707658,0.00009388758,0.000030254594,0.00009745852,0.019190641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930228,0.0033715982,0.00038793831,0.0012568153,0.0013893301,0.00057152624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765202,0.016567659,0.0005306547,0.0014178327,0.0029210232,0.00204279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016466724,0.00068916247,0.0017446389,0.0012104714,0.0043709436,0.006154234,0.002728878,0.036434695,0.0064300364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053958092,0.00054853334,0.0006070672,0.0008451294,0.017515538,0.0076435334,0.0049057454,0.035227954,0.002262288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005614813,0.000028517974,0.00049656845,0.00016821266,0.000030628133,0.0005208369,0.0004470678,0.00018407892,0.00006630355,0.15073742,0.82343733,0.023826998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007722291,0.000037433336,0.00044192743,0.0011643532,0.00003110687,0.0008196499,0.00073743804,0.00041650352,0.00015973575,0.25960383,0.7364335,0.000077383615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014613761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01487296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036434695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033714524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012816489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087085366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407970801","doi":"10.1515/9782760327689-002","title":"Affidavit présenté dans le cadre de la plainte devant la Cour fédérale du Commissaire aux langues officielles du Canada visant les compressions budgétaires de Cbef Windsor","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Humanities; Art; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.022008492082505923,"score_gpt":0.24618032965380474,"score_spread":0.22417183757129883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407970801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05516098,0.0047771097,0.0009077923,0.01807643,0.0010557892,0.00010705448,0.0016978468,0.00011086412,0.91810614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23829857,0.003990564,0.0007617753,0.0032877119,0.00033614592,0.000065482986,0.0009961504,0.00005103946,0.7522125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959489,0.00017976433,0.00012712165,0.00022864512,0.0024834333,0.0010321324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981198,0.00032738163,0.00017087517,0.0000648376,0.0010619396,0.00025514167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014744562,0.0002986988,0.0003589436,0.0015042673,0.005968493,0.0048062117,0.00071825256,0.002261197,0.024681425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040629655,0.00035963033,0.00039097565,0.0014854613,0.0016208113,0.0012608442,0.0015751167,0.004600938,0.0034583353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017775211,0.00011388564,0.018262146,0.0002874148,0.000045043864,0.002515323,0.014196769,0.00088689325,0.0028567803,0.3094262,0.4881602,0.16307165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001851615,0.00005709907,0.04524519,0.0005502927,0.000058833884,0.000660131,0.004796918,0.00035055817,0.0015038803,0.010381376,0.9363012,0.000076048025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55285144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82497776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44714856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013617812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024145702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8995638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407988223","doi":"10.1515/9782760327689-004","title":"Affidavit présenté dans le cadre de la plainte devant la Cour fédérale du Commissaire aux langues officielles du Canada visant les compressions budgétaires de Cbef Windsor","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Political science; Humanities; Art; Geology","score_opus":0.022008492082505923,"score_gpt":0.24618032965380474,"score_spread":0.22417183757129883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407988223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054593697,0.0047842045,0.00090371794,0.018016182,0.00103699,0.00010627875,0.0016903013,0.00010980812,0.9187588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23948696,0.0040523354,0.0007666128,0.0032840532,0.00033483125,0.00006568043,0.0009947063,0.000050990315,0.75096387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959383,0.0001806313,0.0001273375,0.0002292385,0.0024936534,0.0010307792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981029,0.00032993208,0.0001730006,0.000065195454,0.0010722298,0.0002566232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014775512,0.00029827934,0.0003594288,0.0015073208,0.005953617,0.004822416,0.0007195302,0.002257536,0.02475089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00409245,0.00036009314,0.0003900344,0.0014874628,0.0016260225,0.0012652014,0.0015801213,0.004594461,0.0034698416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017617791,0.000113756985,0.018237388,0.0002880607,0.000045018474,0.0024980255,0.014189589,0.00089353195,0.00283048,0.30951244,0.48712534,0.16409023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018573452,0.000057098958,0.04541858,0.00056232786,0.00005944468,0.00066301425,0.004857315,0.00035296523,0.0015045014,0.010594448,0.9358351,0.00007660151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5530556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8254156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98628193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013718056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024312107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8991531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408050539","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5159223","title":"Negating Positive Rights: A Note on Mathur v Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009961321501835698,"score_gpt":0.3076634782958994,"score_spread":0.2977021567940637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408050539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04640957,0.0021261664,0.0020999173,0.41900784,0.0014234072,0.00024079079,0.0006226042,0.000062387466,0.5280073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44245926,0.0026822549,0.0029742524,0.3588942,0.001044008,0.00029013873,0.00018016208,0.00015420545,0.19132157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98320466,0.0015918119,0.0005740385,0.0019741494,0.007826457,0.004828758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850935,0.0077889324,0.00067031005,0.00071176956,0.003744795,0.001990745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008796242,0.0006149878,0.0011218479,0.0011633055,0.020661484,0.008687797,0.00537211,0.027670555,0.010148224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029086946,0.0011069572,0.001234692,0.0014390292,0.015550726,0.0051409276,0.005094786,0.019765776,0.0012986072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011844615,0.000057181467,0.007853224,0.00019008083,0.00011211102,0.0014513273,0.015037956,0.00034266614,0.0015079663,0.6436092,0.31005847,0.019661373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027041096,0.00010716417,0.020625953,0.00092760427,0.0005488948,0.0008057962,0.016158858,0.0008099099,0.003501969,0.11511013,0.8407885,0.00034482198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92295694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97995824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07704306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046037856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.128217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33402956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092874","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1451","title":"A Lifeline During Custodial Interrogations? The Right to Counsel and Reflections on R. v. Dussault and R. v. Lafrance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.05705271651545326,"score_gpt":0.3901966772321616,"score_spread":0.3331439607167084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024153052,0.013096594,0.0013856936,0.7828637,0.0019385865,0.00004476637,0.00011880457,0.00004590916,0.176353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49574685,0.009582133,0.0012048065,0.43770882,0.0020752887,0.00012580553,0.000067647554,0.000097512115,0.053391077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758463,0.010311792,0.0007140682,0.002075339,0.0038630462,0.007189471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816403,0.01221904,0.0007959642,0.00081998727,0.0022367458,0.0022880184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023521712,0.00052425446,0.0007181383,0.0010792768,0.027655078,0.01639295,0.0051465547,0.037693173,0.004642621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034597762,0.00088636426,0.0009100131,0.0007986439,0.047011774,0.011517233,0.006960585,0.028397826,0.00085447915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006229862,0.000054009397,0.0013878078,0.000085254826,0.00001235913,0.0024232354,0.0917642,0.0001407267,0.0005503429,0.77164847,0.11324953,0.018621873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077788274,0.00008354669,0.004422002,0.0014791742,0.000038831073,0.0013271073,0.100386344,0.00021208885,0.0009225705,0.09881051,0.79198635,0.00025369358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6154698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7489313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6154698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03515201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050283786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7735895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408589153","doi":"10.5040/9781509970087.ch-004","title":"Making and Re-Making of Public Law: The Canadian Way","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1182034056314279,"score_gpt":0.3762835084232998,"score_spread":0.2580801027918719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408589153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028231796,0.005659354,0.0025663811,0.2721239,0.0016447598,0.00009360058,0.00081352325,0.00020151222,0.71407384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26375633,0.015613319,0.0137835005,0.06034566,0.0013619249,0.00017559089,0.0009963871,0.00067433907,0.64329296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785483,0.0038407245,0.00045251058,0.001489967,0.010234315,0.0054341834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621318,0.007879199,0.0006830735,0.0021075087,0.019450167,0.0077481614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015482904,0.0011368298,0.00093059574,0.008232881,0.031085785,0.031477638,0.004117159,0.011434358,0.050616544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040580645,0.0006796291,0.0010474664,0.008155519,0.030198576,0.010997788,0.009529887,0.012686606,0.0038918103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013557172,0.00002112321,0.0005886,0.00007255639,0.000011357805,0.00009447464,0.0032478129,0.0002849183,0.00006780759,0.644104,0.31377786,0.03771599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012100946,0.0000064110873,0.002080779,0.000344681,0.000018304203,0.00005506261,0.0063977973,0.0005242862,0.00018615951,0.12967806,0.86062354,0.00007280947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99245036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99559623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8129399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1870601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49872023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94289505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408669280","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.440","title":"Police operational independence and the rule of law in Canada: Improving police governance and accountability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Accountability; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012645489495890044,"score_gpt":0.28788595923725674,"score_spread":0.2752404697413667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408669280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6646396,0.006053453,0.0041868645,0.14042194,0.00038810176,0.00035891728,0.0006153262,0.0000774577,0.18325841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853998,0.0018382916,0.0015250812,0.0021087849,0.000025230906,0.000036744834,0.00008515943,0.000015697844,0.008965225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991106,0.0013257351,0.00022315708,0.0005477054,0.0033312088,0.0034662043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882041,0.0019743904,0.0010685598,0.00031690238,0.0047875876,0.0036483507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045397826,0.00027844188,0.0003783707,0.0022354426,0.02697853,0.009796075,0.0018660573,0.0014056058,0.0031221788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01950059,0.0004294391,0.000288963,0.004305862,0.009359414,0.0029472876,0.004537874,0.004306264,0.00013539704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014736924,0.0002820963,0.1758945,0.00041264834,0.00006522196,0.0011957143,0.19595835,0.0033180998,0.0012083333,0.32783443,0.061639283,0.23204397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004277567,0.00012140567,0.48453495,0.00094698335,0.00009764686,0.00016575857,0.20401591,0.0046354397,0.0011790349,0.025833901,0.2781406,0.0002856593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99803835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25486907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25486907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50517297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86424625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408720570","doi":"10.1515/9780776645285-013","title":"À PROPOS DE LA REVUE DE DROIT D’OTTAWA","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026274456709677756,"score_gpt":0.2513519874385374,"score_spread":0.22507753072885966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408720570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010783401,0.123346046,0.0024922923,0.22157784,0.0138839185,0.00012844498,0.0012437841,0.00014232623,0.6264019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1485174,0.037303556,0.0036812178,0.037269212,0.0015902708,0.00019666208,0.00027891775,0.0002557395,0.77090704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188554,0.0016195613,0.0005738312,0.0011044875,0.0027165972,0.0021000188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582005,0.0015906154,0.00018109693,0.00044101584,0.0014001568,0.0005669567],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036708154,0.0009887326,0.0009241571,0.0036265322,0.01528913,0.01861522,0.0021872844,0.00946936,0.021222092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010688674,0.001305253,0.0011195494,0.0032320514,0.016997328,0.0074696597,0.0067100734,0.012998437,0.0032142776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041462317,0.000014117423,0.00041659767,0.00020297016,0.000022617394,0.0003770463,0.010666807,0.00015337527,0.00013618484,0.79022175,0.17815343,0.01959356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007223798,0.000006075395,0.00072743965,0.00037559977,0.0000199045,0.0000879194,0.0023532931,0.000039039267,0.00013199184,0.016959341,0.97923905,0.000053208212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8756573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9435732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98138475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072512664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10323224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52611864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408815946","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5172476","title":"Message Undeliverable: An Empirical Assessment of the (Un)Readability of Canadian Court Decisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Political science; Programming language","score_opus":0.05637727611359311,"score_gpt":0.3973884611788661,"score_spread":0.341011185065273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408815946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8955603,0.0014322787,0.00066885696,0.009785599,0.00014694926,0.00020436838,0.0040614773,0.0000786019,0.08806162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994493,0.0003497795,0.00024291377,0.00044457047,0.00004945873,0.000020537242,0.00073135877,0.00003466706,0.0036338097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985299,0.0023915446,0.0010794248,0.0011376668,0.008758709,0.0013336656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73909867,0.15063813,0.034904663,0.008647079,0.05985167,0.00685985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011446211,0.0002815972,0.00038888658,0.006224813,0.0053417333,0.005780153,0.002657458,0.0021654498,0.017241742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29021668,0.00033998597,0.00047855405,0.0052638454,0.004455658,0.0039240313,0.0021861224,0.0030384476,0.0007843886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012712503,0.0004870624,0.6644894,0.0007456878,0.00031178322,0.0015449523,0.14533699,0.0023636539,0.0016325761,0.030444551,0.0386611,0.11271099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006592245,0.00013189203,0.9081291,0.0005220026,0.00016820217,0.00039074736,0.040259365,0.0023521276,0.00076983054,0.006125587,0.040861506,0.00022365431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94293594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94555455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031643603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03955997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22959143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409006058","doi":"10.59962/9780774870672-007","title":"5 Narrating the After of the Moment of Redress: Fred Kelly’s “Confession of a Born Again Pagan” and Roy Miki’s Redress: Inside the Japanese Canadian Call for Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Confession (law); Economic Justice; Moment (physics); Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.0214757962150913,"score_gpt":0.22338134513550942,"score_spread":0.20190554892041812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409006058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021526635,0.020543572,0.0016650199,0.15227655,0.019834915,0.00007460037,0.0002918732,0.00009576704,0.783691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23781127,0.007819562,0.0011119966,0.048530694,0.002011391,0.00009365088,0.00016044875,0.00024490207,0.702216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998553,0.00058035454,0.000022972341,0.00009753729,0.00041323705,0.00033281412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905366,0.00030788424,0.000048917806,0.00003294265,0.0003058028,0.0002506784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012435603,0.00058877765,0.00035959555,0.000876887,0.01879838,0.0048657823,0.0010190023,0.0040041213,0.009237367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029465058,0.00034534323,0.0002973602,0.0010162028,0.010216028,0.002754041,0.002983084,0.008799589,0.0020890406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027248181,0.000010651347,0.00029620092,0.0000803511,0.00000526826,0.0016790456,0.2016614,0.000048112805,0.00043625289,0.10986652,0.67856544,0.0073235203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021651804,0.000005956265,0.00071001315,0.00017868234,0.0000037827517,0.00045371382,0.067382134,0.000022645398,0.00017286821,0.0017339275,0.92931104,0.000023084509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37869763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6638251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62130237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013829335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085875355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7529867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081068","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1490","title":"Probative of Prejudice: Procedural Unfairness Underlying Security Threat Group Classifications in Canadian Prisons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06450815909641282,"score_gpt":0.4076119381828813,"score_spread":0.34310377908646844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91672915,0.0006525729,0.0017176624,0.016781898,0.00006540879,0.00011623759,0.00013069368,0.000013278719,0.06379298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975834,0.00016591261,0.00026200307,0.00055235205,0.000013188401,0.000011338534,0.000018362636,0.000004326841,0.00138899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675925,0.0022864542,0.00044107705,0.001023144,0.0056586205,0.0038313803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97328013,0.0072943284,0.0070160413,0.0016431212,0.008156283,0.002610094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011181241,0.0003039962,0.00039048193,0.0026339116,0.01934148,0.0056099435,0.0026423791,0.0023181604,0.004166646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05393129,0.00037227714,0.00060290436,0.0023945803,0.015786925,0.00213482,0.0056373333,0.004384971,0.00013922631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027218464,0.00025714625,0.4812244,0.00023919171,0.0001859929,0.0011068644,0.18034679,0.0012587886,0.0012511392,0.24457262,0.010014921,0.07927004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039236715,0.000093587034,0.77124506,0.0007972905,0.00032349554,0.00040480835,0.15622653,0.0028195179,0.0011741209,0.037781797,0.028899914,0.00019470607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98725045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066897854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066897854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081115566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48538017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409239273","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p106","title":"The Creation of an English Criminal Code: 6 Acts Third Act - State Crimes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); State (computer science); Criminology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.10812334661914991,"score_gpt":0.4942373070025287,"score_spread":0.3861139603833788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409239273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18903683,0.011609585,0.015215627,0.2615332,0.024232661,0.0014579106,0.013155742,0.0005984429,0.48315993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5767488,0.0054640654,0.04512048,0.06339185,0.004014884,0.0017772516,0.009911953,0.0003709604,0.29319984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832991,0.0031468428,0.0022396776,0.0008015581,0.0085013155,0.0020116232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707958,0.0070172227,0.0040298016,0.0017912656,0.0119722625,0.004393687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010440864,0.0005230902,0.00055120076,0.003002524,0.0044301967,0.0047909818,0.0012609822,0.006739258,0.0063829655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027734403,0.0008392004,0.0009836274,0.0014602302,0.004032064,0.004832374,0.005218999,0.0071775,0.0023248086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025252384,0.00036640093,0.027662143,0.0003390601,0.00004397245,0.0014129606,0.008549227,0.0004597179,0.0015327248,0.40642178,0.46344048,0.08951898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008733842,0.0002938236,0.15951164,0.0010437575,0.00007459722,0.001537539,0.007697364,0.001036636,0.0023435312,0.03034208,0.79573685,0.00029485687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07519555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13002789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07519555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042378088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026385562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14951575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409345272","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p139","title":"The Creation of a UK Criminal Code: 6 Acts Fourth Act – Weapons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Computer security; Criminology; Law; Business; Computer science; Criminal law; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.14359065504143279,"score_gpt":0.5050186937625969,"score_spread":0.36142803872116414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409345272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026414074,0.013184127,0.0055973167,0.349031,0.051733922,0.001186875,0.0118461065,0.0011529089,0.53985363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1417157,0.004497835,0.0117824115,0.08106822,0.0045758123,0.0013466983,0.008321543,0.0004794825,0.74621236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97125006,0.0044869063,0.003662878,0.0012462173,0.015774492,0.0035794952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447106,0.010894082,0.006065745,0.004225154,0.026644805,0.0074595753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009278058,0.00093630154,0.00094657054,0.0037907986,0.004982974,0.00916931,0.001943284,0.018760106,0.02490563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05377962,0.0013751431,0.0015195357,0.0016868471,0.0039287494,0.0041488786,0.006067222,0.01033453,0.015752444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011436752,0.00006298795,0.0021181896,0.00022338622,0.000019679343,0.00033099653,0.0007254022,0.00017560426,0.0006927895,0.044035986,0.9236486,0.027852131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006448356,0.00013507322,0.02227836,0.00056604337,0.000024321771,0.00032811885,0.0005909058,0.00023228777,0.000602569,0.0028619228,0.9721819,0.00013383687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16641417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22240211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16641417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016727494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041799862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33089107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674518","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-05-x","title":"Left Wanting: A Case Comment on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0309976237075008,"score_gpt":0.294895670142851,"score_spread":0.2638980464353502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014859668,0.0028851265,0.00097110396,0.88385427,0.0044788085,0.00010063653,0.00021527556,0.00006916311,0.09256599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081132464,0.001373775,0.00059035444,0.88514775,0.0016043574,0.0000625244,0.00006466312,0.000082095125,0.029942015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98552793,0.0022458418,0.0005994497,0.0021561172,0.0046600546,0.004810675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900365,0.0061893594,0.0003844118,0.00025742187,0.0018907936,0.0012414978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009025153,0.00081833935,0.0010397468,0.0012785121,0.0322423,0.009966932,0.0071021155,0.04481408,0.0046064816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02383769,0.0012903025,0.0018550387,0.0018283199,0.015219407,0.0052297097,0.004804328,0.059917916,0.0011332219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007235859,0.000060969356,0.0024626874,0.00012663772,0.000046411937,0.008067559,0.022423238,0.00035468227,0.0010945474,0.26468444,0.6904691,0.01013728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000726332,0.00007774064,0.0041287825,0.0008068809,0.0001316668,0.0028347804,0.031055385,0.0007984857,0.0016993084,0.027112797,0.93083584,0.0004457286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82337606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88145155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17662394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040081028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.064449884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3553282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409680646","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.70010","title":"The Quest for Regulating Crime Scene Investigation in Forensic Science: Can We Learn About Discretion and Standardization From Other Fields?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Forensic Science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Technology Sydney","keywords":"Discretion; Standardization; Forensic science; Engineering ethics; Crime scene; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.041318856793865016,"score_gpt":0.378505258542524,"score_spread":0.337186401748659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409680646","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012506859,0.72855854,0.015278692,0.22223517,0.0026029192,0.00006161368,0.00004368481,0.000053351956,0.018659236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31176808,0.62225294,0.012701241,0.047656134,0.0036830993,0.00023720162,0.00007766264,0.000073750445,0.0015498289],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9342622,0.04263109,0.005608668,0.0026075034,0.013505746,0.0013848214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74974775,0.19239633,0.020015458,0.015629837,0.018910436,0.0033002256],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07871476,0.00045414318,0.0019917882,0.004265392,0.0029361355,0.014090601,0.002675449,0.00615459,0.0018272958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13413619,0.00057192723,0.0013828699,0.0037017444,0.033801027,0.019211855,0.006938274,0.009261618,0.00037278034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010594437,0.00014941176,0.0049273833,0.015094308,0.00026741732,0.00021455987,0.021669986,0.0011051308,0.0007906548,0.44737872,0.014781674,0.49351484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066276574,0.0001991608,0.012288326,0.073759064,0.00025722515,0.000687437,0.021285504,0.0009463349,0.0014679183,0.5288739,0.3599643,0.00020446966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008680556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008045523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005486513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017642232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41628838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409689670","doi":"10.1177/00220183251336101","title":"The Criminal Cases Review Commission - A Quarter of a Century On","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Commission; Political science; Criminology; Law; History; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04902798316237291,"score_gpt":0.38338424633758017,"score_spread":0.3343562631752073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409689670","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006114736,0.1415636,0.005549722,0.6216112,0.06383136,0.00052087597,0.00060913386,0.000605399,0.159594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10864405,0.054065704,0.009463418,0.56511223,0.026526112,0.0006532932,0.00071056373,0.00078897784,0.23403557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87515855,0.022570072,0.010082344,0.012137562,0.068561345,0.011490101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7732376,0.09284878,0.010705542,0.024010913,0.0842955,0.014901632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0747485,0.0007817146,0.0019349875,0.009745468,0.009667308,0.031685222,0.004952982,0.031868536,0.008265658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1782106,0.0016623298,0.001809229,0.005421122,0.017641034,0.013550467,0.008407684,0.024101632,0.0049948352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005293336,0.000050725186,0.0011519165,0.0003816381,0.000033030152,0.00042269158,0.0013947885,0.0001429299,0.00042273913,0.33872524,0.58168375,0.075537644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011878254,0.000027532931,0.0012220328,0.00069071655,0.000014169198,0.00013765703,0.00031154376,0.00008015891,0.00020310332,0.0047490643,0.99250764,0.00004439983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08975143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08975143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030547138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08630295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3953126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410456896","doi":"10.3917/dpo.008.0013","title":"Protection des données et sanction : une nécessaire quête d’effectivité","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DPO news","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15986708082407397,"score_gpt":0.32751352278703144,"score_spread":0.16764644196295747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410456896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4421445,0.008785948,0.011633784,0.09659402,0.000706992,0.00013670042,0.00025251234,0.00008531893,0.4396603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97255415,0.0017390706,0.0011478441,0.0038439014,0.00007678083,0.00006736402,0.00004875286,0.00005762021,0.020464636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817853,0.010120664,0.00041259392,0.0010649298,0.004629827,0.0019868356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695504,0.015918275,0.002872903,0.002220793,0.0075488486,0.0018887174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013388893,0.00033486102,0.0005162041,0.0016430755,0.021662304,0.011854154,0.0016593009,0.0024379012,0.008204135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02894885,0.00038800415,0.00035739064,0.0025185319,0.03558163,0.0066876644,0.0067125056,0.005508754,0.000624573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005092712,0.000027230275,0.009588435,0.00023009765,0.000026160464,0.00044312584,0.7816519,0.00013105855,0.00053419766,0.16369975,0.005982194,0.037635002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013317315,0.00004275292,0.029931063,0.00090498215,0.000037242917,0.00042573508,0.584546,0.00020508251,0.00050531793,0.017827101,0.36549345,0.00006788487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46422812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57868105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46422812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02535575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03307904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.923052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410626381","doi":"10.5040/9798881810528.ch-008","title":"Wrongful Convictions In Nigeria And Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.018855616314608893,"score_gpt":0.2814454182175364,"score_spread":0.26258980190292747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410626381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81446964,0.00375022,0.00016805917,0.022845592,0.00031804445,0.00014075509,0.0053599956,0.000036260073,0.15291141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524214,0.0023361724,0.00013550237,0.0018201312,0.000026082904,0.000027992135,0.00072729914,0.00001980904,0.04248566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974559,0.00018332954,0.00008233331,0.000100061494,0.0005520672,0.0016263727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907211,0.0011619749,0.000759149,0.0002076744,0.0042599672,0.0028901051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012268621,0.00021490146,0.00035970355,0.0030148777,0.013561231,0.0027916408,0.0015498084,0.0020646565,0.009672463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012211842,0.0003059107,0.0003214353,0.0042510917,0.0020565905,0.00087920105,0.0025771153,0.0029352477,0.0005678296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003339127,0.0003646678,0.600377,0.00031250194,0.00009974008,0.0040045306,0.023511816,0.0019638939,0.00019041527,0.09082952,0.18293038,0.09508151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005533923,0.000069348156,0.7806883,0.00080046896,0.000117824755,0.00129552,0.12430036,0.0021441998,0.0005221177,0.008008233,0.08184698,0.0001513171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99905187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04969741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04969741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13929056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36058164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785023","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0018","title":"Extensions of Term and Supplementary Protection Certificates","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.15581831881220876,"score_gpt":0.3144423831785037,"score_spread":0.15862406436629495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029270211,0.004764628,0.04152985,0.007838017,0.0009461548,0.00022384283,0.00022127973,0.000255038,0.91495097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7823223,0.0046918583,0.030192763,0.0070105647,0.0013048741,0.0005320602,0.00031521465,0.00021436393,0.17341597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778977,0.0076562073,0.0014083014,0.0024617468,0.0091915885,0.001384475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655826,0.020552633,0.0016354617,0.0065726857,0.004896742,0.0007599393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013613349,0.0005110988,0.00079743285,0.0029890877,0.0031346185,0.008953368,0.0027363163,0.0046382253,0.014178283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036787152,0.0007170837,0.0011043824,0.002414832,0.016831217,0.0096372655,0.0058565983,0.009748147,0.0030426218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018459918,0.000017297534,0.00022570278,0.00008215811,0.0000039038277,0.00014640305,0.0012369197,0.00030417775,0.00039853159,0.96934074,0.0045599155,0.023665769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038049304,0.00017556796,0.0018088153,0.0010921725,0.000037507667,0.001020732,0.0010726237,0.0013365088,0.00238491,0.4781065,0.5128295,0.00009722126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032351958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031478265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014178283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042161727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075091776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07199508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411088767","doi":"10.29173/wclawr125","title":"Reasons for Exoneration Among Fresh Evidence Cases in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07574556604782746,"score_gpt":0.3660804613256722,"score_spread":0.29033489527784473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411088767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7690662,0.16843443,0.0013874467,0.029115228,0.00060502754,0.0010383669,0.0045606894,0.000073170326,0.025719464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478497,0.043994717,0.0009433914,0.0030011525,0.0000767234,0.000097025215,0.0011657903,0.000029251938,0.0028422363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97786546,0.0024440244,0.0026367537,0.0018464923,0.011052524,0.0041547646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90583175,0.031745195,0.020527473,0.0020006313,0.03479783,0.005097184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016068844,0.00041511157,0.00094739156,0.013098766,0.0074208244,0.0043444624,0.0031855889,0.0019219476,0.0027564506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112530746,0.0007909385,0.0009779168,0.015755009,0.0034327882,0.0010349256,0.0026478702,0.0022524463,0.00015157547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006837446,0.00009828975,0.67930007,0.006246202,0.00063263427,0.008694704,0.030928936,0.0011778274,0.00072973873,0.019044798,0.042464085,0.20999898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009031367,0.00007992965,0.8904358,0.0068887738,0.0006180206,0.0022562963,0.02623255,0.000993637,0.0007320183,0.0021160103,0.06935402,0.00020259524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07310444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07310444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14301896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5304123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411542049","doi":"10.1162/99608f92.dc58eb7a","title":"Navigating the Privacy Landscape: Harmonizing Legislative and Public Sector Approaches in the Canadian Context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard Data Science Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Context (archaeology); Public sector; Political science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Public administration; Geography; Computer science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.35686093694706433,"score_gpt":0.4034727452268728,"score_spread":0.046611808279808487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411542049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09525631,0.025651786,0.014306633,0.62022316,0.0011000218,0.0004118767,0.0007353351,0.00017381915,0.24214098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282249,0.013633707,0.011385784,0.032373164,0.00020635204,0.00018661511,0.00024212075,0.0001255542,0.013621795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9234424,0.027209716,0.0025351446,0.0049359156,0.02523106,0.01664585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90353364,0.0407812,0.0032925066,0.0034941386,0.03897553,0.009922929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062363848,0.00069761573,0.0011894209,0.011701681,0.06430032,0.04348149,0.007844977,0.0075821048,0.0040682536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07501945,0.0011436876,0.001036062,0.019967975,0.059576016,0.01079135,0.01427923,0.011517581,0.00027182372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004903227,0.000044571094,0.0073970323,0.0004990572,0.000060978895,0.0006324354,0.17446668,0.0021463905,0.0005928638,0.731578,0.037827324,0.04470574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033255594,0.000037601887,0.020969642,0.0020090665,0.00013367833,0.00022085742,0.31861824,0.0022092545,0.00086479814,0.098812796,0.5557391,0.00035179686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99643886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4934841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.4934841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.7156559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5874866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411871392","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105424","title":"Facilitating police reform: Body cameras, police-involved homicides, and law enforcement outcomes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Criminology; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.049416228047314534,"score_gpt":0.3407960028178037,"score_spread":0.29137977477048915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411871392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948538,0.00017295821,0.00032452837,0.0008334193,0.0000097630145,0.00010283521,0.00009577145,0.0000103659195,0.0035967045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991725,0.00009394379,0.00018457475,0.000089679925,0.000014602434,0.00006279768,0.000053296506,0.0000026050986,0.00032586104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293363,0.004310651,0.00024250329,0.0005655053,0.0006766502,0.0012709827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96819055,0.009411103,0.017879805,0.0012963593,0.0009637244,0.002258493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004033453,0.00024096867,0.00041246414,0.0010292012,0.001270303,0.00273234,0.00095244084,0.0012648387,0.0074586733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03236356,0.00027995248,0.00041364998,0.0010837849,0.0025220923,0.0021126994,0.0029764757,0.0013483289,0.00055916916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001237037,0.007603853,0.90800756,0.00023696558,0.00026193805,0.00021763069,0.0035178054,0.0019316089,0.0012836483,0.006072258,0.0028115613,0.066818066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009746536,0.00081113464,0.9889031,0.00012270694,0.00008323396,0.000032581396,0.0061524506,0.0007109177,0.0005306717,0.00085153733,0.00168894,0.000015258075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012351563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017519476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012351563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022468923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024287826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024951816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411960152","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5335949","title":"L'article 33 de la Charte canadienne et le pouvoir déclaratoire du tribunal //&amp;nbsp;Section 33 of the Canadian Charter and the Declaratory Power of the Courts","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Humanities; Section (typography); Tribunal; Power (physics); Law; Philosophy; Physics; Business","score_opus":0.008735321097805449,"score_gpt":0.2513879126482933,"score_spread":0.24265259155048785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411960152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154104745,0.012491009,0.0063978946,0.10021486,0.012473719,0.0007613503,0.0064115394,0.00046108197,0.845378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14616805,0.004937341,0.0073415833,0.04215997,0.0024152596,0.0005766972,0.0018315681,0.00037629594,0.79419315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98349357,0.0014166768,0.00066714466,0.0015565667,0.007956392,0.00490974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98913467,0.0037264312,0.0004638565,0.0010561091,0.0045960634,0.001022836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653687,0.0011458255,0.0012954065,0.002772869,0.013407614,0.018720344,0.002942488,0.015529645,0.032630187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022321446,0.0011874252,0.0015857854,0.0046140486,0.0064792787,0.0031372015,0.0023241828,0.0145747345,0.0045078215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004970131,0.000033441054,0.0008036484,0.0001020077,0.000018560866,0.00015779685,0.0014989328,0.00026725928,0.0005394208,0.66555554,0.3198605,0.011113265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003440354,0.000015735788,0.0057150233,0.00021130689,0.000024554623,0.00008307213,0.00058191916,0.00025464158,0.0006059563,0.021117477,0.97126365,0.00009217266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96499056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06328486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15535747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45916593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411986273","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2025.06.006","title":"The need to implement better integrated and reasonably optimized protection strategy – One Protection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.05619275820073229,"score_gpt":0.3443051172662218,"score_spread":0.28811235906548954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411986273","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03324116,0.02930169,0.2709342,0.49797216,0.0026704064,0.0018095705,0.00034873167,0.0009682391,0.16275392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5086716,0.020603295,0.3664339,0.07987452,0.001205796,0.0015189623,0.0005342399,0.0004310113,0.020726765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498753,0.024009598,0.003240662,0.004139089,0.014891508,0.0038438533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94277114,0.019853586,0.0073942584,0.0086688,0.014177471,0.0071347086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0441417,0.0011770221,0.0014714783,0.0039193444,0.004406319,0.015934091,0.004428687,0.00872705,0.00675158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04994439,0.0007935571,0.0014032245,0.0021595429,0.01067174,0.018830763,0.015426507,0.013694649,0.0027658606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118324206,0.0010280327,0.013181581,0.005022237,0.00060096756,0.0008812825,0.010981046,0.01035386,0.0063814754,0.54530746,0.055237155,0.35090664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000801704,0.00068496127,0.01149086,0.009256264,0.0002318045,0.001123451,0.018847993,0.003262446,0.0034322762,0.5260403,0.42524996,0.00029949826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072973664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080861235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0441417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009681608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06178916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23344636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412021662","doi":"10.22201/iij.24485306e.2025.1.19606","title":"Toward a New Regulation on the Exclusionary Rule. What Can Mexico Learn from American and Canadian Experiences?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04976149122974346,"score_gpt":0.32843880271412995,"score_spread":0.2786773114843865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412021662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018811041,0.085902035,0.0078883115,0.6339513,0.006066513,0.00016740439,0.000791233,0.00017817368,0.24624397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3996452,0.13773273,0.029835911,0.33832625,0.0045303227,0.0006378681,0.000986652,0.0002325586,0.0880725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99192727,0.0019250273,0.00043058346,0.0013147086,0.0033834034,0.0010190019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98615044,0.004905712,0.0008840801,0.0010260361,0.0061605833,0.00087319466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013156841,0.0004666543,0.00075156096,0.0033771277,0.009935593,0.010971141,0.0024828564,0.006374259,0.0050158855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018587315,0.00039273922,0.0007927865,0.0031471862,0.012844428,0.005966154,0.003156694,0.0118378885,0.00051526004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076743345,0.00006037377,0.0027085347,0.0005447316,0.000033699755,0.00034317037,0.005943396,0.0002918644,0.0007738816,0.8113023,0.095695786,0.08222555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041105282,0.000041950923,0.006598935,0.0022463761,0.00006703521,0.00010044163,0.0028830757,0.00020890977,0.00044569667,0.040486865,0.9468098,0.00006976598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.824104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18519002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043159265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08528817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37256128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412073486","doi":"10.7202/1118442ar","title":"Revoir l’interprétation de la clause de dérogation à l’article 33 de la <i>Charte canadienne</i> suivant le recalibrage méthodologique de l’arrêt <i>Québec inc</i>","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.018881166952890282,"score_gpt":0.29543655110125244,"score_spread":0.27655538414836217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412073486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04733199,0.011731337,0.089660704,0.23544094,0.005083581,0.00033879405,0.0009987827,0.0003217498,0.6090921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67974234,0.00485959,0.03723809,0.037506048,0.0007325054,0.00035416748,0.00031829101,0.00036795033,0.23888102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916328,0.0032259938,0.00022274019,0.0012184194,0.0027248168,0.00097528024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087733,0.0034675817,0.00042866782,0.0008011659,0.003971369,0.00045391865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084475,0.0005920956,0.00045229428,0.0015302685,0.008701795,0.009116763,0.0022623278,0.0037422122,0.008599028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011905808,0.00038566763,0.00073269114,0.0015639747,0.02537292,0.0031253416,0.0024385925,0.007883357,0.00096988684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013471572,0.0000048756706,0.0004371807,0.00006056478,0.000008005128,0.00008489606,0.01048914,0.0002467634,0.00027957428,0.96232164,0.01944895,0.0066049187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021654381,0.000025628815,0.0034503513,0.00057412806,0.00003929105,0.00011137789,0.010328886,0.0008837106,0.0016372046,0.12236986,0.8604395,0.00011830578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81766945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8903847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18233055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05580275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062223464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40487915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412073497","doi":"10.7202/1118439ar","title":"L’intérêt pour agir et le conflit des normes : analyse de l’article 85 du nouveau <i>Code de procédure civile</i> au regard de l’arrêt <i>Downtown Eastside</i>","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.02316147214268907,"score_gpt":0.28513917163083885,"score_spread":0.26197769948814975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412073497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15134436,0.003885145,0.008219159,0.046660405,0.0003306555,0.00011397957,0.00016001626,0.000023432533,0.7892629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265166,0.0010996707,0.0016588973,0.0042426963,0.00010855746,0.00007762692,0.00007378271,0.00005305133,0.06616897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834594,0.0049782665,0.0003392295,0.0011119058,0.0074827266,0.0026284256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98569554,0.007389269,0.0010765183,0.0004993801,0.004495939,0.0008432848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008978069,0.00033681167,0.0004023103,0.002048587,0.011937341,0.017514365,0.0015105753,0.0036648768,0.0046833027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01392831,0.00033253102,0.00046571708,0.00309214,0.03274223,0.0036189675,0.003684993,0.0060989177,0.0004847705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009381039,0.000009491086,0.0013978521,0.00003703973,0.000005928499,0.00017505734,0.05625171,0.00017831422,0.00010014308,0.9304918,0.0062980633,0.0050452226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022838283,0.00003475697,0.033397667,0.0010576234,0.000054652755,0.00021567772,0.17603788,0.0017440972,0.000866446,0.17886525,0.60761535,0.0000878037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63513887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68460923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63513887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057934403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06802393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73401976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412261424","doi":"","title":"Commentary:Introduction of Fresh Evidence by the Prosecution During Cross-Examination in the Special Court for Sierra Leone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Special court; Law; Political science; History; Ethnology","score_opus":0.06874709827467554,"score_gpt":0.3451065918163597,"score_spread":0.2763594935416842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412261424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004995627,0.0036003795,0.00015474389,0.9327434,0.05932305,0.00002475824,0.000084603314,0.000026915648,0.0035425974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003913789,0.0012186295,0.00016941802,0.95350295,0.03852464,0.00003796152,0.000020869033,0.000050972532,0.0025608148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97305965,0.0101760095,0.003368994,0.0040680114,0.006688595,0.0026388012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8479252,0.12171561,0.004879511,0.0024490606,0.0191834,0.003847317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022595983,0.0013540663,0.0029484844,0.002444275,0.014419316,0.010109547,0.011427741,0.10640983,0.005118717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1385864,0.0019210496,0.0026454057,0.0022123505,0.014660493,0.009710576,0.0041328887,0.09696615,0.0035906057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027277047,0.000007769014,0.00011172938,0.000246209,0.000022074337,0.00086905545,0.0023351645,0.000040941686,0.00011976849,0.0051897587,0.98854697,0.002483214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004172221,0.00003063813,0.0005825796,0.0030581837,0.00007470047,0.0008508121,0.0040395656,0.00017718627,0.00033881946,0.006207048,0.98449796,0.00010074841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05798868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07977408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10640983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016598828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026177337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12043351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412274051","doi":"","title":"Constructing Remorse as a Legal Category: Plea Bargains at the ICTY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Plea; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1301054246176766,"score_gpt":0.3508797986428793,"score_spread":0.22077437402520272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412274051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29416162,0.0006634336,0.07066359,0.017505184,0.00018279324,0.00020564329,0.00018345917,0.00011345649,0.6163208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818839,0.00006976503,0.0058252607,0.00042258576,0.000024899933,0.000056500885,0.00004108709,0.00005104498,0.011625044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272437,0.010008698,0.00067923364,0.001741266,0.0024345212,0.0024119837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97890353,0.013683697,0.0016156737,0.0028047485,0.0017002713,0.0012921888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013239469,0.00043220792,0.00086617866,0.002933918,0.0115053775,0.018912988,0.0024956628,0.0077312565,0.02211908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049948275,0.0006969141,0.00092594227,0.0026412145,0.024338534,0.02324495,0.011711721,0.008675502,0.0016341365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043839296,0.000037198017,0.0018456839,0.000020677648,0.00000880828,0.00014973812,0.008766388,0.00028814044,0.00014562599,0.9809201,0.0010491783,0.0067245997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021343805,0.000039363924,0.0034512726,0.00014418155,0.00003104247,0.00018338575,0.022378761,0.0031978118,0.00061798614,0.9485826,0.021305783,0.000046430014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013417886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0173141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02211908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066583417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007176362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07399565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412620447","doi":"10.17118/11143/23019","title":"La circulation des modèles de règlement des différends entre le Québec et la France : l’exemple de la médiation familiale et de la conciliation par le juge","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de prévention et règlement des différends","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028076693752577125,"score_gpt":0.354768676853983,"score_spread":0.3266919831014059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412620447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35278502,0.009032589,0.047311764,0.07076656,0.0004918988,0.00016089896,0.0005734631,0.00023525652,0.5186426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97486615,0.0012293675,0.0027324683,0.00083723554,0.000042574324,0.000052636133,0.0000761406,0.00003422741,0.020129219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975349,0.0012044993,0.000041790954,0.000321007,0.0004963327,0.0004015233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972898,0.0009789959,0.00027596828,0.00024799714,0.00088981766,0.00031743705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028801097,0.0005025731,0.00043981234,0.0019998355,0.01056318,0.008456876,0.0016905183,0.0022156874,0.00966734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047881724,0.000256453,0.0004669943,0.0020899852,0.018973917,0.004615063,0.003837637,0.0026332138,0.0004545544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030106925,0.00001846697,0.005783372,0.00006571794,0.000025369985,0.0003907156,0.062402334,0.0012608053,0.00018400633,0.9142831,0.0033682145,0.012187795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007604403,0.00010221841,0.042302284,0.0011186254,0.00014543138,0.0004508432,0.1578086,0.0093354285,0.00062201737,0.32942346,0.45842305,0.00019192511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8254358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.808889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04608607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033577047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35118443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243843","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.157","title":"Une Proposition Plus Modeste: Soumissions Bilingues Au Minister de la Justice de Québec Dans the Cadre de Réformes Possible au Régime D’Action Collective","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07169375138471744,"score_gpt":0.3659684716094626,"score_spread":0.29427472022474516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243843","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014861821,0.53546464,0.0012265026,0.31747594,0.00553677,0.00026170912,0.0016849445,0.0000518259,0.1234359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43595174,0.35287148,0.0045855227,0.12000297,0.0023469252,0.0005771256,0.0012937847,0.00006900056,0.082301416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993427,0.0029505773,0.0004205587,0.00076261006,0.0041884696,0.0017434076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982081,0.0061465725,0.0008892212,0.00045013672,0.00934512,0.0010879714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013419647,0.0005734726,0.00088413997,0.0031605691,0.0053363545,0.008145293,0.002252081,0.004272184,0.007920814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019127429,0.00030524065,0.0006658492,0.004664153,0.0059641125,0.0026666755,0.0012811456,0.0047749276,0.0005425758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002156322,0.00006373085,0.0033727447,0.008174199,0.00022594396,0.0002755483,0.0072121783,0.0011227423,0.0010664621,0.49459335,0.35521176,0.12846568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006625813,0.00006506116,0.013714191,0.006523811,0.0002610002,0.000068523776,0.0034509806,0.00025763543,0.00040943242,0.008390736,0.96672386,0.00006847622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96627253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97996897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114193045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114193045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24029131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8285324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243923","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.157","title":"A Wrench in the Social Justice Toolbox: Assessing the Constitutional Class Action as a Tool for Addressing Racial Discrimination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Racial profiling; Charter; Certification; Class action; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.23614461289656694,"score_gpt":0.47982218160432744,"score_spread":0.2436775687077605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243923","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06565012,0.46055117,0.012031496,0.1998447,0.003879287,0.0012391723,0.0010215039,0.00010891906,0.25567362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81144327,0.13192824,0.017124789,0.024746664,0.0009086778,0.000506814,0.00036575078,0.000052310275,0.012923491],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587785,0.018693855,0.0013927219,0.0012154443,0.017751057,0.002168462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873072,0.05139687,0.0071839835,0.002294271,0.048398092,0.0034196095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054176345,0.0006423812,0.00090632564,0.01530583,0.009358458,0.010614156,0.0029308046,0.0024603372,0.004145385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09391592,0.00041094588,0.0008761717,0.009382165,0.014692102,0.004166792,0.0034657235,0.0037731922,0.0003237132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012473579,0.00021220256,0.035426464,0.0069932244,0.00025326465,0.00020227683,0.011397152,0.0009908967,0.00037671436,0.33062267,0.08148095,0.5319194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010632803,0.00056733954,0.20289254,0.045834184,0.0013871513,0.00020447218,0.032927427,0.0030763822,0.0015873775,0.060188487,0.6508971,0.00033123122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85585934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.946735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14414066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06657314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17820704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48302424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244049","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.085","title":"<i>L’oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal V JJ</i> and the Growing Complexity of Quebec’s Authorization Criteria","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Supreme court; SAINT; Expansive; Authorization; Political science; Context (archaeology); Class action; Sociology; State (computer science); History; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10122455447083115,"score_gpt":0.33173791158624116,"score_spread":0.23051335711541002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024006197,0.033259578,0.0027743268,0.6869722,0.005375973,0.0002210683,0.0014526988,0.00011556586,0.24582238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48737562,0.012207709,0.004360319,0.41190544,0.0037978499,0.00017952,0.00050502527,0.00013898026,0.07952947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742361,0.0057076816,0.0012808635,0.002205822,0.011646058,0.004923406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93917304,0.030538933,0.002347097,0.0015843979,0.02387788,0.0024787001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026297526,0.00053720444,0.00084604317,0.0040147486,0.016400032,0.01433049,0.0051517524,0.014279899,0.0069969445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041211948,0.00073504064,0.0012805308,0.0037335039,0.0122244675,0.0029718124,0.0020977128,0.014267857,0.00093458453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090725356,0.000029525198,0.005957904,0.00046793098,0.000107493535,0.0011161672,0.005211954,0.0006079099,0.0005508518,0.37110463,0.5945412,0.020213688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008822419,0.000041703774,0.021405466,0.0016644088,0.0001677786,0.0003627306,0.0041797208,0.0011168362,0.0010683006,0.022348477,0.94723904,0.0003172555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10240683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10240683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13079336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.743017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244056","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.005","title":"L’accès À la Justice Pour les Personnes Vulnérables par la Voie de L’action Collective en Droit Québécois","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Damages; Collateral; Settlement (finance); Compensation (psychology); Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Geography; Computer security; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.11050649169997039,"score_gpt":0.3520173006824248,"score_spread":0.24151080898245442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16847931,0.19541046,0.0022742462,0.23423329,0.004690078,0.0003711543,0.0020340506,0.00009776146,0.39240968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81423056,0.06799138,0.0022373365,0.024263285,0.0008603355,0.00021659886,0.00064261677,0.000037458005,0.08952033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548054,0.001236488,0.00016921808,0.0002784204,0.0016699762,0.0011654021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904857,0.0033709605,0.00063886755,0.00023216254,0.0038853968,0.0013868699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008185459,0.00038568157,0.00045857704,0.0032780143,0.00823141,0.0058175297,0.0014263775,0.003520818,0.014062663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014029011,0.0002990496,0.00045257463,0.0019933546,0.0034371205,0.0015517,0.0018645579,0.0036338142,0.00053336256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025454402,0.0002413398,0.039834972,0.0029315348,0.00020850911,0.0030173778,0.030478392,0.0011596264,0.0013182387,0.2359802,0.35259503,0.3319802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006301125,0.000116236566,0.057085022,0.0076723564,0.00017805568,0.000577041,0.017523607,0.0005469688,0.0006711602,0.005290224,0.91018146,0.00009489079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045703553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045703553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116800405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33160406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244112","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.093","title":"The Unworkability of the Workable Methodology Standard","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Harm; Class (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Standard of review; Management science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Law; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Economics; Judicial review; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.24558615611904988,"score_gpt":0.4420005306699135,"score_spread":0.19641437455086364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023846518,0.0054194513,0.26010197,0.33479768,0.0044074454,0.0009173779,0.00082778774,0.000578913,0.3691029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7520853,0.0020743292,0.12650208,0.0869838,0.0015462679,0.00087543076,0.0003063754,0.00023328784,0.029393008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88163155,0.029242372,0.008283993,0.01310795,0.061714247,0.0060198577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8259412,0.08491315,0.0063441107,0.02165216,0.057245772,0.003903747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09864448,0.0008737835,0.001253821,0.004275863,0.010052179,0.013857646,0.008425756,0.018105429,0.0051141926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1625721,0.001391372,0.0022372333,0.0022013665,0.064945474,0.010996377,0.008898493,0.026644425,0.0018238557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973063,0.000008591314,0.0002464187,0.000050458093,0.00000949828,0.000045798344,0.0008145159,0.00013198347,0.00013162199,0.9897531,0.004573373,0.004224853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007434776,0.00006156332,0.0015429922,0.0006643752,0.0000649953,0.00022457074,0.0008691868,0.0017546524,0.0012402621,0.9059145,0.08745539,0.00013320002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24704602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1883545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24704602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029993525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07840907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5216881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413375438","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5393506","title":"Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Laws in Canada: Legal Framework, Challenges, and Future Directions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy laws of the United States; Computer security; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Law; Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03976092922511073,"score_gpt":0.32919435739142855,"score_spread":0.28943342816631784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413375438","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08785188,0.02829435,0.003691369,0.7759289,0.0010700177,0.00026577956,0.0035487176,0.00018697343,0.09916204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8253267,0.030944744,0.012766156,0.08992066,0.0005960116,0.00016747382,0.0017441155,0.00012883852,0.0384053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834362,0.0018250386,0.00059139903,0.0012659769,0.005983295,0.0068979273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93128,0.017917765,0.0030754842,0.0013651388,0.034699306,0.011662277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012798993,0.0005860388,0.0012538771,0.0069591277,0.019078504,0.026197955,0.0054719467,0.0071694893,0.010613774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04274113,0.0007667139,0.001405654,0.013416088,0.014633042,0.007289284,0.004736284,0.011058109,0.00046227098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013130359,0.00021024156,0.050175868,0.00076566765,0.00015271292,0.0005483245,0.0070269755,0.0031039275,0.00044971544,0.7296962,0.1297428,0.07799622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020886604,0.00013630542,0.15353806,0.006502684,0.00046477973,0.0003499396,0.07793784,0.011293281,0.0015753555,0.20797867,0.539307,0.0007072083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28531137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28531137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.664726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82893753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413396821","doi":"10.1007/s12286-025-00649-8","title":"The rule of law under permanent pressure and the compensatory role of external accountability: A comparative study of independent police complaints bodies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Accountability; Rule of law; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0310984087084388,"score_gpt":0.36781338807091907,"score_spread":0.3367149793624803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413396821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9311266,0.0003732474,0.0009000986,0.0007959919,0.00001904245,0.00005394273,0.000027239048,0.000004075733,0.06669977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985001,0.00008984276,0.00008650086,0.000049446633,0.000010365002,0.000016051026,0.000011831652,0.0000038878393,0.0012320243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832291,0.0104824,0.00044845775,0.0010099326,0.0023278843,0.002502147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93590415,0.04228925,0.012199321,0.0032250832,0.004338086,0.0020440384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011750967,0.00015454128,0.0005918073,0.0041462593,0.0062126783,0.008651447,0.0011003305,0.0014154689,0.006897022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033851646,0.00035250175,0.00031243823,0.0049726698,0.01569161,0.0059822495,0.005824704,0.0018668923,0.0003865149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028755842,0.00071427267,0.11357595,0.00025255486,0.00007754742,0.0023591048,0.45601702,0.00081266987,0.00076075917,0.3787103,0.0020181504,0.044414207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006851956,0.00039621326,0.294055,0.0007034812,0.00008309454,0.0006989895,0.63575095,0.001388391,0.000699377,0.015856309,0.050224867,0.00007473693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017878385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019909421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017878385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00849515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055452455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06214577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413469227","doi":"10.29173/mlj1394","title":"Getting Rid of the Riot Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Repeal; Charter; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Criminal code; Law and economics; Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02681296220836043,"score_gpt":0.3197490507229217,"score_spread":0.29293608851456127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413469227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013508923,0.006247203,0.002335812,0.24696952,0.0033002521,0.0002279351,0.0005123299,0.00017210825,0.7267258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30307505,0.013033372,0.005139132,0.4126508,0.0016984127,0.00030763782,0.0011105883,0.0003284593,0.26265666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871989,0.0020011012,0.00044491334,0.0010323406,0.0066821575,0.0026405673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98517114,0.002881785,0.0006977116,0.0016496754,0.007245024,0.0023547658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069301827,0.00048284605,0.00054590876,0.0017149494,0.02148007,0.00819436,0.0030244973,0.008941465,0.012559945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039259687,0.0003878041,0.0007147344,0.0015827457,0.014899119,0.0052532693,0.005103383,0.01570558,0.0031006474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001731681,0.000043785196,0.0044894298,0.0001775487,0.000024670031,0.0005750348,0.010290315,0.00018077697,0.00028402358,0.3939654,0.53518444,0.054767285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130143735,0.000020072517,0.006962191,0.00062525464,0.00005082443,0.0003269095,0.0068972115,0.00010620365,0.00040289975,0.024123728,0.96041965,0.000052019874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8070734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8793958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19292659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015721835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09411875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38812548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413614359","doi":"10.64628/aam.dy6x5dgj9","title":"How police are recovering the victims of the Toronto serial killer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.035969271133543194,"score_gpt":0.3099297992675217,"score_spread":0.2739605281339785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413614359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.278814,0.0065940716,0.0007588575,0.56204176,0.003793691,0.00012973165,0.00044456596,0.00010943686,0.147314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89385545,0.010496403,0.00060985197,0.02428499,0.0011010299,0.00005364556,0.00034505475,0.00015411977,0.06909949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940386,0.0019323184,0.00017539322,0.00027708645,0.0012872705,0.0022894149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884155,0.0017799723,0.0013150327,0.00054711784,0.0036123488,0.0043300195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036552835,0.00052487466,0.0005010281,0.0023917628,0.028167002,0.011155984,0.0027649214,0.0063757394,0.018546963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03785838,0.00061604433,0.0005881657,0.0022807298,0.013189024,0.0053148437,0.007064498,0.009966043,0.0025564497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023062131,0.00020395336,0.04976327,0.00037854258,0.00018252748,0.0046251253,0.3173149,0.00068767107,0.00058034307,0.028029766,0.4739305,0.124072716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018071152,0.00011336243,0.034863688,0.00072041096,0.000117790514,0.00085747597,0.72107744,0.0002049196,0.00044666493,0.006916394,0.23453791,0.00012585998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61131895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38868105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024465453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049297705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78194016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413634966","doi":"10.64628/aam.5nfqpp9mf","title":"10 privacy violations in the federal government’s proposed changes to the Canada Elections Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Internet privacy; Public administration; Privacy policy; Law; Political science; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.036798148470274065,"score_gpt":0.3165036552643556,"score_spread":0.2797055067940815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413634966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10129592,0.00297966,0.0029946754,0.5104581,0.0070371157,0.00070251967,0.0017898233,0.00018596517,0.37255627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51106626,0.0016324611,0.0043034446,0.29597947,0.001682621,0.00029179134,0.00038736872,0.000120616445,0.18453598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9512785,0.006325348,0.0017207881,0.00306365,0.018481964,0.019129658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96770513,0.013236429,0.0012275401,0.00132894,0.011248309,0.0052535795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020616854,0.0008324537,0.0011026957,0.002659005,0.02918483,0.021426773,0.006191097,0.034746338,0.007874248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07365617,0.0013907023,0.0021068277,0.0025897536,0.010954063,0.004072487,0.005702024,0.030710928,0.0009786433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028529813,0.00023045317,0.011498143,0.0001024974,0.00012648232,0.0011748892,0.0095759705,0.0019452851,0.000914115,0.61894697,0.33686495,0.018335022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044193456,0.00014740342,0.048044275,0.00050011004,0.00054422946,0.00031112327,0.013324585,0.005020042,0.0036361008,0.052148037,0.8752418,0.00064041134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99371487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13756225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13756225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30663913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413639863","doi":"10.64628/aam.hj4kdrnst","title":"Calls to designate the Bishnoi gang a terrorist group shine a spotlight on Canada’s security laws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Criminology; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.032133175016556936,"score_gpt":0.32944572575898434,"score_spread":0.2973125507424274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413639863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032865606,0.0028972556,0.0026844905,0.75565135,0.008137241,0.00021134898,0.0008077093,0.00032067447,0.1964243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38445577,0.0033192888,0.009140097,0.25787026,0.0015105018,0.00016977578,0.0006793273,0.00055656506,0.3422985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98893344,0.0011941724,0.00026151133,0.00077550934,0.0048452765,0.0039901836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697224,0.0057092723,0.00061362836,0.0011709365,0.01239642,0.010387317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072735297,0.0006171956,0.00066467753,0.002407592,0.029625775,0.0130942855,0.0031930793,0.011181425,0.021159584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030877508,0.00073794316,0.000795244,0.0019911532,0.013195318,0.0034885365,0.003820418,0.01581511,0.0018907557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057913883,0.000051094106,0.0058991434,0.00009039971,0.000025562736,0.00018266086,0.0045240656,0.00037249684,0.0006359841,0.2169017,0.7396712,0.031587865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046091158,0.000028245555,0.0095905615,0.00026163523,0.00004119773,0.00006727093,0.008837025,0.0005947273,0.000762761,0.0155882845,0.9640696,0.0001125747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110236324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110236324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3254321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79982424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413733822","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.159","title":"To Certify or not to Certify: Third Parties, Necessary Parties, and the Certification of Class Actions in Common Law Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Law; Class (philosophy); Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2073191494114714,"score_gpt":0.393964020773789,"score_spread":0.1866448713623176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413733822","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005089121,0.94115543,0.00047833702,0.025672916,0.0008128573,0.00005094083,0.00014488335,0.000008169599,0.026587322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18057291,0.80043,0.0014743578,0.011502889,0.00041860147,0.000052997588,0.0002120573,0.000018610932,0.005317616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982545,0.0032563116,0.0011858927,0.0009082644,0.010457086,0.0016473144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94581133,0.022230899,0.004488641,0.0007106496,0.024635723,0.0021226825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019716537,0.00043291677,0.0009804934,0.012387237,0.005282479,0.008740747,0.0030915237,0.0033289446,0.00267846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048482943,0.00048040895,0.00075440673,0.014120901,0.00971403,0.0025421893,0.0016861863,0.0038447657,0.00022019658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010303851,0.00009051647,0.010682497,0.017235383,0.00036506014,0.0005496003,0.00848327,0.0012608835,0.0003273784,0.30357352,0.15811542,0.49921352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006098649,0.000080439866,0.05116425,0.053868335,0.0010074627,0.0004156941,0.007043087,0.0005641432,0.0005675209,0.025104985,0.85993445,0.00018862716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98814523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09909667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09909667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27196676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71900004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803083","doi":"10.29173/mlj1469","title":"Zora , the Charter , and the Youth Criminal Justice Act : Defending the Rights of Youths is the Responsibility of all Court Participants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.09147198667652984,"score_gpt":0.3585794246392055,"score_spread":0.26710743796267566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14655109,0.028878897,0.011457961,0.2829879,0.002369306,0.00017130506,0.00020230594,0.00017933041,0.5272019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247512,0.005642013,0.0033193459,0.028129525,0.0003149064,0.000073392956,0.000044961784,0.000053797023,0.0376709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98430485,0.0051521766,0.0004897443,0.0012808946,0.004260107,0.004512212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410534,0.0024471502,0.0006519722,0.00035327475,0.001565888,0.0008762483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061067324,0.00037814604,0.00040165175,0.0008731912,0.021580297,0.015409996,0.0023019714,0.0078788195,0.0018759934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013512216,0.00039531075,0.0004380784,0.0011699169,0.031641033,0.005784488,0.005126513,0.0096213855,0.0003190326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009369589,0.000009303468,0.0015820655,0.000059029244,0.000005521456,0.00025994104,0.052467503,0.00014275701,0.00016628136,0.90555686,0.028922983,0.010818391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018216822,0.000056773733,0.015215179,0.0012152983,0.000056411747,0.0007190581,0.11122433,0.0008731554,0.0008692339,0.10605737,0.76349497,0.00020001094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8390644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9045236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16093558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033009272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087908335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3237667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803092","doi":"10.29173/mlj1436","title":"The Dangers of Police “Operational” Independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Independence (probability theory); Law; Legislature; Statute; Law enforcement; Political science; Legislation; Enforcement; Statutory law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.026235348595649827,"score_gpt":0.32984606926507104,"score_spread":0.3036107206694212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14845517,0.0066049555,0.036508467,0.33175984,0.0015029928,0.00016098944,0.0002760605,0.00022403977,0.47450742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515487,0.0021356656,0.0043246574,0.025267761,0.00071938086,0.00010885052,0.00008794914,0.00008206085,0.015724894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97241205,0.0070593674,0.0012646649,0.002333121,0.013337807,0.0035929524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96928865,0.01253008,0.0028410114,0.0045595355,0.008578952,0.002201732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019796425,0.00039243457,0.00051093224,0.0019946005,0.011108905,0.0060333335,0.0022569504,0.0033703041,0.0018588506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036232825,0.000853425,0.000512087,0.0017325116,0.04657202,0.005687541,0.007108719,0.014250324,0.00049110194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030637515,0.000016913802,0.003136257,0.000058742153,0.000010550385,0.00015735334,0.013414724,0.00031160924,0.00026887027,0.948884,0.014572805,0.019137518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062569554,0.00006587494,0.019691955,0.0009185686,0.000035099845,0.0006040567,0.020833176,0.0020171846,0.001222845,0.57727605,0.37710884,0.00016380977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21067402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19875757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21067402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01357206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031573478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41889554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803093","doi":"10.29173/mlj1467","title":"A Rush to Justice: The Institution of Presumptive Ceilings in R v Jordan and Their Potential Implications for Wrongful Convictions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Economic Justice; Law; Criminal justice; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03519614542772662,"score_gpt":0.34546262910588454,"score_spread":0.3102664836781579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8890805,0.002952592,0.0015021715,0.026811494,0.00007212513,0.00006983865,0.000090955255,0.000020597185,0.079399645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925694,0.0010666687,0.00056518684,0.0027675938,0.000046152854,0.000022731523,0.00001953726,0.0000092049895,0.0029335227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926583,0.002736193,0.00026412078,0.0005475393,0.001729356,0.002064544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97940516,0.009327392,0.005999477,0.0007674713,0.0022268142,0.002273603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011763843,0.00022230165,0.0004515684,0.0016291289,0.008320451,0.009502695,0.002491906,0.002776611,0.0032643278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033641633,0.0004267813,0.00047994457,0.0017686791,0.014933633,0.004965601,0.0080599515,0.0058218804,0.00023598164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035297722,0.0004027372,0.12124668,0.00027577358,0.000060687435,0.0073223207,0.15284383,0.002224612,0.00081685564,0.6606359,0.008533289,0.045284364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014620642,0.0005220974,0.17534262,0.002433318,0.00020613219,0.002446962,0.44493553,0.0048279124,0.0028091476,0.26588017,0.09999884,0.00045108012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25683603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42621663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74316394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015792305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034914017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5106821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803095","doi":"10.29173/mlj1446","title":"The Problem of Threshold in the Emergencies Act – A Triple Incapacity Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Ambiguity; Political science; Declaration; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.053497907233864356,"score_gpt":0.32845232724072465,"score_spread":0.2749544200068603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048361782,0.0021643466,0.16872403,0.14282535,0.000866242,0.0002874079,0.0005547323,0.00020711501,0.636009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631571,0.000709296,0.014030814,0.007918877,0.0003339113,0.00039771336,0.000111333124,0.000074098316,0.013266858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912197,0.0037855725,0.00039068793,0.001064876,0.0023125086,0.0012266242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98720855,0.0071497727,0.00089085597,0.0013172711,0.0021429404,0.0012905971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011844869,0.0007198753,0.0010239254,0.0020313263,0.0062220646,0.009482761,0.0040692138,0.0070124962,0.007974143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021442084,0.00066962134,0.0012445434,0.0014746091,0.02451543,0.012711651,0.0050743357,0.012564546,0.0011907507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033781891,0.0000044254534,0.00009114368,0.0000051156503,0.0000017152807,0.00002265524,0.00034433138,0.00032914506,0.000007968749,0.9980246,0.0006708961,0.00049469055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018530936,0.000008176681,0.00018602515,0.000048197693,0.0000058664255,0.000042091935,0.0005432117,0.002832821,0.000029431656,0.9877293,0.008542093,0.00001437482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06577697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036203787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93422306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013916474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015469521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1307882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803105","doi":"10.29173/mlj1466","title":"“Interrogators often use honey, not vinegar, in pursuit of the truth”: Resistance, the Constitutional Right to Silence and Judicial Responses to Cell-Plant Operations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Silence; Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.028899689069268993,"score_gpt":0.2978155939401019,"score_spread":0.2689159048708329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25976843,0.018542545,0.05451481,0.22175215,0.0028605352,0.00029448437,0.00018390351,0.00052815286,0.441555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9253024,0.0029210977,0.0042040963,0.039211288,0.00070342387,0.0001551364,0.000068080095,0.00032628697,0.027108278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96353865,0.027636068,0.001084804,0.002503286,0.0034226913,0.0018145803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967208,0.022960411,0.00347657,0.0025270858,0.0031480489,0.0006799212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023350239,0.0007009041,0.00073180423,0.0014532163,0.013248611,0.0143679045,0.0027622485,0.008381242,0.0044691605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060082987,0.0010614394,0.0005573765,0.001373947,0.03822046,0.012829515,0.0075359805,0.008445555,0.0022801147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070366295,0.000019840363,0.0020083124,0.0002389418,0.00003656102,0.0016158017,0.6028251,0.0000961431,0.0027838652,0.34247386,0.029377399,0.018453721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003871838,0.000052065607,0.0021666307,0.0009196482,0.000057088506,0.0020509297,0.33695525,0.00061241793,0.003989158,0.07495144,0.57806206,0.00014468007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014555988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016146403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023350239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004674229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040127872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12348932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803113","doi":"10.29173/mlj1437","title":"Public Order Policing: a Proposal for a Charter-compliant Legislative Response","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Legislature; Public administration; CLARITY; Government (linguistics); Commission; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09954293055492032,"score_gpt":0.3641933856721289,"score_spread":0.2646504551172086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057340055,0.0014285459,0.11717778,0.76821005,0.02641125,0.0102433795,0.0003847434,0.0032127176,0.067197464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08030085,0.001583919,0.406938,0.3881614,0.010302867,0.015160475,0.0007118693,0.0009794435,0.09586128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8658305,0.043457434,0.015299876,0.014304565,0.03926623,0.021841425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.862944,0.051512677,0.009566125,0.013511174,0.045352746,0.01711328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1744559,0.0028692083,0.0023689687,0.007580545,0.018389821,0.033524275,0.014356826,0.09626552,0.012651642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17340606,0.0034630897,0.0062675257,0.0037777026,0.027169624,0.02099662,0.016075565,0.052859746,0.007237891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058477002,0.0007348533,0.00085622113,0.00038554394,0.000052883304,0.0010982256,0.005048471,0.0030547332,0.0012043959,0.7435529,0.21869464,0.025258755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056529924,0.0006233771,0.0019143188,0.0017876405,0.00012162819,0.00044860903,0.0069849626,0.006328815,0.0014532888,0.1680496,0.8109483,0.0007741144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03540455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042052843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96459544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023711406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1657268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92262197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803134","doi":"10.29173/mlj1440","title":"Interjurisdictional Accountability for Interjurisdictional Problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Mandate; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Commission; Political science; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Order (exchange); Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.040417446634113695,"score_gpt":0.3566701150574818,"score_spread":0.31625266842336813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0690514,0.0056461114,0.010811275,0.414194,0.001222227,0.00016711479,0.00021909352,0.00013212759,0.49855667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407387,0.0029853913,0.0015788164,0.031336017,0.00030023037,0.000039074213,0.000060710037,0.00003607366,0.022924969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838844,0.0028664875,0.00043423884,0.00087679474,0.007228013,0.0047101513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962339,0.014091668,0.0037224554,0.0015934362,0.015080215,0.0031731753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010223293,0.00030107013,0.00039508773,0.0021255012,0.020066096,0.010044651,0.0031883402,0.006736836,0.0068336953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051200926,0.00028271088,0.00050640706,0.0020228252,0.02617191,0.0046155555,0.004719164,0.010523554,0.00037399773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012478727,0.000055426026,0.021121612,0.00017201625,0.000026327623,0.00058598747,0.020018155,0.00088964397,0.00015493717,0.8492603,0.07065178,0.037051443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040436084,0.000053777745,0.08359935,0.0026739114,0.00016532927,0.00080845994,0.069359064,0.005432564,0.0011802114,0.23591752,0.600584,0.00018539392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9106401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95875967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08935988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05328943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19048376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38664365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803135","doi":"10.29173/mlj1480","title":"Racializing Terror: Reassessing the Motive of the Motive Clause","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Terrorism; Legislation; Racism; Criminology; Criminal justice; Law; Legislative history; Political science; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.03388675302078331,"score_gpt":0.34456557747940575,"score_spread":0.31067882445862244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1477802,0.017090986,0.055992473,0.36693722,0.005023485,0.00029994783,0.00011235801,0.00011003989,0.4066533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91157544,0.0042979806,0.013162681,0.054151602,0.0010565543,0.00014683715,0.000037691414,0.000091819755,0.015479394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909507,0.004042528,0.00029900693,0.00067034794,0.0027352476,0.0013021668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794939,0.011755707,0.0018512869,0.0013570499,0.004601933,0.0009401355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017385608,0.00029610048,0.00036510953,0.0015570282,0.008277761,0.007831468,0.0017201664,0.004869649,0.0018690384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02680991,0.00036000166,0.00045653174,0.00076129497,0.032788318,0.006610156,0.004401216,0.009060666,0.00025375906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008458659,0.000008886335,0.0017580335,0.000047743797,0.0000053616577,0.000105511084,0.0076001133,0.00009374654,0.00025505052,0.9755549,0.003286399,0.011275895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041341802,0.00006869825,0.0136087835,0.0020079599,0.000080853824,0.00053861056,0.024943879,0.0010970724,0.0032868774,0.2679884,0.6862212,0.00011624112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12440032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21586329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8755997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0122932745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027679322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24735248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803180","doi":"10.29173/mlj1482","title":"Establishing Police Accountability: How Do We Stop Charter Violations from Happening","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Accountability; Misconduct; Political science; Law; Wonder; Pledge; Psychology","score_opus":0.04308281489198616,"score_gpt":0.328212989770504,"score_spread":0.28513017487851783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00884769,0.0042500086,0.014756223,0.92927057,0.0042958683,0.00015702785,0.00015366294,0.000760133,0.037508797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6286901,0.01876583,0.037965428,0.26499236,0.0059772274,0.000542851,0.0005286505,0.0011350322,0.04140253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9396797,0.015456739,0.0016643839,0.004471494,0.021843614,0.016884077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8645513,0.024466345,0.012424457,0.00796866,0.058159444,0.032429766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051709004,0.0013325778,0.0015737166,0.005323376,0.030525511,0.023615615,0.004872159,0.009653577,0.0070821135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13759786,0.0009713188,0.0012697339,0.004116848,0.029122477,0.025413048,0.010712258,0.024927936,0.002981489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011936783,0.00035393075,0.02566546,0.0011595832,0.00021864148,0.000516535,0.031412233,0.0029031525,0.0012898889,0.19066904,0.44309166,0.3026005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000122011195,0.00023984667,0.024340764,0.003096829,0.00020611283,0.00024410046,0.029095242,0.0028394097,0.0018570682,0.13371323,0.8036725,0.0005727891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7015884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71516806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2984116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05328466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25936902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.600338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413949777","doi":"10.63478/5zj20aul","title":"Proud Boys face Canada’s Anti-Terror Law: But Who’s Next?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.11650255617685304,"score_gpt":0.3642092182995316,"score_spread":0.24770666212267858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413949777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032845438,0.0070098517,0.00031237214,0.77416855,0.0020410058,0.00010158575,0.0010863218,0.00006547601,0.1823694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3084661,0.008370041,0.00075779663,0.28364208,0.0010228781,0.00011116481,0.00066809467,0.00012434466,0.39683753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924386,0.00057032023,0.00007332704,0.0001800364,0.0030939612,0.003643676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918349,0.001647093,0.00028118587,0.00011211126,0.0032452026,0.0028795274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003071181,0.0005667396,0.00042315948,0.0015716493,0.030469488,0.010563354,0.0018433926,0.010650807,0.013368929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010761457,0.00049995544,0.0004431836,0.0015776212,0.0063603213,0.0030451193,0.002976801,0.012097331,0.0011958521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050944625,0.00005406755,0.011244032,0.00008013239,0.000022842152,0.00037648977,0.00944086,0.00011129908,0.00021198121,0.077951364,0.87634283,0.024113173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033052747,0.00003616385,0.036259096,0.00029245226,0.000051856197,0.00017985649,0.05567695,0.00021909532,0.0007249482,0.007410062,0.8989958,0.00012070088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98997724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055426907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055426907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17513984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40215224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414204183","doi":"10.61205/s199132220031084-8","title":"Criminal Liability for Fraud in Anglo-Saxon States (Using the Examples of UK, USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Criminal liability; Criminal law; Proportionality (law); Criminal procedure; State (computer science); Liability","score_opus":0.17736655301466211,"score_gpt":0.38988399475969393,"score_spread":0.21251744174503182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414204183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727225,0.00044781424,0.00013328837,0.00018722446,0.00000436637,0.000020445794,0.000082429884,0.0000024996002,0.026399463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809676,0.00042852992,0.00025255996,0.000054916123,0.0000014621678,0.0000081606695,0.00006276979,0.0000010957483,0.0010937465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986405,0.00048393366,0.00009068865,0.00009988345,0.00033191484,0.00035311098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971908,0.0011142844,0.00073668425,0.00014076648,0.0006611062,0.00015648143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011516272,0.00011500222,0.00017278742,0.0042986325,0.0042342967,0.0019338018,0.00033466634,0.00038003287,0.0016358154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040350985,0.00016773956,0.00015160322,0.006238222,0.0037470863,0.0012173465,0.0015584448,0.00054921897,0.00009532679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016273095,0.0001185373,0.4185444,0.00025795668,0.000057300233,0.0016088642,0.36584917,0.00083043886,0.0013492203,0.13162327,0.0023455303,0.07725251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073091987,0.000064917884,0.8827781,0.00016109279,0.000044018987,0.0006029178,0.09006662,0.000659429,0.00043269905,0.0028799323,0.022268627,0.00003433018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55089796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7841424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44910204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009444967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00535614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90349376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415280268","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102533","title":"Corrigendum to “Is the Static-99R valid for all men with ‘identifiable’ victims? Examining cases of online sexual solicitation of children” [Journal of Criminal Justice 97 (2025) 102358]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre; Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Ottawa; Government of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sexual violence; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.1211340924608414,"score_gpt":0.4026846393693931,"score_spread":0.2815505469085517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415280268","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020956849,0.0016739947,0.00060922623,0.44216684,0.49152064,0.00041511204,0.0047075134,0.001120905,0.055690046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0156743,0.0016962981,0.00086910976,0.5535263,0.05667697,0.0008706375,0.0021943103,0.0004264629,0.36806563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932395,0.0008768228,0.000945785,0.0010271888,0.0026039851,0.0013066889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688993,0.009878498,0.001345393,0.0017040496,0.016743837,0.0014289076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004905417,0.0016383998,0.002655957,0.004231451,0.009090413,0.005067138,0.006372746,0.021351423,0.07781165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05939251,0.001696358,0.0031122672,0.002290443,0.003309933,0.0025258847,0.0046841605,0.012073369,0.05811863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071085083,0.000010813432,0.00023087503,0.000027377648,0.000009009492,0.00016231838,0.000079755875,0.000013766451,0.000026834805,0.00032719524,0.99727196,0.0018329808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005020111,0.00005680578,0.014828824,0.000462557,0.00013878588,0.00041596932,0.0013060004,0.0005700508,0.00033071268,0.00200257,0.97968125,0.00015628885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1586623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2592867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007845341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009374683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3154776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415583124","doi":"10.61345/1339-7915.2025.1.11","title":"The principle of the free evaluation of evidence","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Visegrad Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conviction; Element (criminal law); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Enforcement","score_opus":0.2619277938794468,"score_gpt":0.47478912046713007,"score_spread":0.21286132658768325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415583124","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072313575,0.010287676,0.6541816,0.05668875,0.0027206934,0.0012067788,0.0009106526,0.0002790252,0.26649347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40313858,0.0077012572,0.51801825,0.02735505,0.0066476543,0.005167656,0.00046432702,0.00035629258,0.031150887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87983906,0.04671845,0.011108977,0.015046537,0.043817703,0.0034693177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8904316,0.07456586,0.0044781175,0.014166088,0.014799847,0.0015585014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08531607,0.00152314,0.0042594075,0.007013203,0.0051044947,0.01558986,0.0050766445,0.01409092,0.0044097384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114307314,0.0018963,0.004098882,0.0026639667,0.06551364,0.0149504,0.0107132625,0.013890755,0.0034319926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013432459,0.000009448699,0.00009806964,0.000119124845,0.00003298011,0.000064216416,0.0002689165,0.00035802406,0.0001230658,0.99181116,0.001679965,0.005421584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029733686,0.000027001715,0.00012085874,0.00023755041,0.000025112862,0.0001647318,0.000045554556,0.0005484345,0.00027241991,0.9806146,0.017878348,0.000035666544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002689585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014010273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08531607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064471676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013190974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4511999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290318","doi":"10.29173/alr2826","title":"Licencing State Misconduct: Revisiting Nasogaluak and Ward","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Misconduct; Charter; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); Section (typography)","score_opus":0.033512376375265975,"score_gpt":0.3523474182841691,"score_spread":0.3188350419089031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014125541,0.5328888,0.0013394426,0.37239596,0.01175077,0.00022218208,0.00022435623,0.000043712414,0.06700912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19837265,0.62310517,0.005540595,0.1461565,0.0057806084,0.0001721978,0.00022789561,0.00009150303,0.020552877],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226743,0.00301394,0.00073444727,0.00048211587,0.0030019407,0.000500125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95455605,0.025093785,0.0018346114,0.0012472626,0.016113779,0.0011544509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01594921,0.00031004392,0.0009261359,0.006121711,0.0024268874,0.0051148576,0.003218726,0.005414968,0.0039065615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049787205,0.00049382384,0.00055165647,0.0042250664,0.005359271,0.004777314,0.0023324348,0.0063270805,0.0011910399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014695131,0.00020868263,0.003598322,0.0037519962,0.00007358736,0.0007707563,0.0040595224,0.0006716414,0.0002910531,0.20344028,0.37638584,0.4066013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007940577,0.00009942747,0.008030704,0.017127723,0.00022610677,0.0006117011,0.0037273462,0.00053479394,0.00032523158,0.0373258,0.9317945,0.00011721587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12098441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26228768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12098441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007957318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029090857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24056041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416416295","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5647750","title":"The Consent Integrity Clause (2025)&amp;nbsp;&lt;div&gt; The First Forensic Doctrine of Autonomy&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Consent Integrity Audit and Evidentiary Framework)&lt;/div&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Audit; Agency (philosophy); Criminal procedure; Criminal code; Data integrity","score_opus":0.07907630550485088,"score_gpt":0.3668040353423497,"score_spread":0.2877277298374988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416416295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009302194,0.0008398699,0.018165542,0.04522645,0.003434151,0.00080682663,0.0029630628,0.00038810517,0.9188737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3041015,0.0008815509,0.04671528,0.12476328,0.002548841,0.0022430292,0.0020049822,0.00036310646,0.51637846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984568,0.0027866466,0.0013411056,0.0019367435,0.0066794297,0.0026880957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198456,0.0068162866,0.00084416015,0.0029421349,0.0066332454,0.00077956426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012992523,0.00064336765,0.00084586296,0.0013930784,0.0054541687,0.006531844,0.0023311656,0.026374394,0.022228552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044798605,0.0013964995,0.0015075562,0.001313039,0.006341508,0.006011768,0.0032086587,0.017384598,0.016609993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021653395,0.000029172752,0.00016303221,0.00003794419,0.0000042876936,0.000076320255,0.00044421875,0.00005600877,0.00045952972,0.93870974,0.054731686,0.005266309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013046598,0.00006519415,0.002848456,0.0004250076,0.000044802884,0.0005938297,0.00044195485,0.0010053264,0.0036354633,0.41092396,0.5797472,0.00013829627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043227408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032235347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043227408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042564496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01841967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08595157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416878322","doi":"10.4000/1597s","title":"Lanceur d’alerte ou informateur de police : quand le statut du dénonciateur influence le régime de protections","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Workaround; Legislation; Poison control; Criminal liability","score_opus":0.01559623106755947,"score_gpt":0.29264118055015154,"score_spread":0.27704494948259206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416878322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47827,0.005442318,0.03825404,0.058562476,0.00043358584,0.00024647804,0.0008116044,0.00017169403,0.41780785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862519,0.0006187732,0.0010920716,0.0011030769,0.00011202629,0.000054027038,0.00006257887,0.00003816198,0.010667433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97119755,0.0132201305,0.0013735921,0.002883733,0.008124318,0.003200669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8972472,0.069781594,0.014595082,0.00674975,0.008993001,0.0026334736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019887768,0.00035867371,0.0007019336,0.003781369,0.00531475,0.01357644,0.0016067934,0.004392201,0.014346325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093096204,0.0006543198,0.00056151673,0.0031342132,0.01156827,0.008493938,0.0055061136,0.0045069247,0.0015684674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026986047,0.000098558885,0.034042872,0.00025996563,0.00010104125,0.00047536852,0.035619866,0.00080466236,0.0006642768,0.8860126,0.004025538,0.037625395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026372957,0.00038551132,0.17708711,0.0030869683,0.00040751032,0.0010007912,0.06737638,0.0044073006,0.0046740007,0.5309803,0.2100045,0.00032597609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026817173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021551691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026817173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008617719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012005013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10517776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417042885","doi":"10.3138/chr.106.4.br16","title":"<i>Canadian Criminal Law in Ten Cases.</i> Martin L. Friedland","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.04193980006277599,"score_gpt":0.3185597430915202,"score_spread":0.2766199430287442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417042885","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044615785,0.716527,0.00022899793,0.17976992,0.020687137,0.0001103619,0.0031548024,0.00008393873,0.07899171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023967754,0.6775121,0.0012637501,0.16946153,0.008772072,0.0002222824,0.004036575,0.00016129663,0.11460271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948442,0.00050666276,0.00030238842,0.00035356835,0.0030884426,0.000904718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793066,0.0024355073,0.00061730586,0.00023651398,0.007856828,0.0009231267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039531556,0.0015961052,0.0009944646,0.014529228,0.011767474,0.0064261355,0.0043136026,0.0062223417,0.016578726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016321499,0.00085586275,0.0010610815,0.02290564,0.0052636126,0.0035249607,0.0019151398,0.005814615,0.0037539976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005251258,0.000001965681,0.00010459186,0.00027397383,0.000004445469,0.000024495619,0.00009887195,0.000010588759,0.000008673115,0.002586666,0.98804957,0.0088309245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055093665,0.0000031533257,0.0032335047,0.002171508,0.000027857808,0.000073086194,0.0005077643,0.000024777532,0.000056661887,0.0011335069,0.9927389,0.000023687435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96751696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061759528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061759528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11935382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44809884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49823495","doi":"10.71781/23468","title":"Les négociations des plaidoyers de culpabilité : la pratique des avocats de la défense","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06708335478473432,"score_gpt":0.4179866696126532,"score_spread":0.35090331482791887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49823495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7114661,0.009873705,0.011679447,0.113812484,0.0003846414,0.00021249142,0.00008502408,0.000039851355,0.15244633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976487,0.0014595494,0.0008566712,0.0039546113,0.00005596001,0.000049145532,0.000014648538,0.00000845867,0.017113982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902829,0.0054996954,0.00015845573,0.00064675155,0.0016298152,0.0017824485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799989,0.010291319,0.0026621046,0.0007295592,0.003398721,0.0029195354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009733627,0.00035788812,0.00036997968,0.0013825881,0.016225439,0.0076120626,0.0018449243,0.0030097954,0.00673914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02954317,0.00030092834,0.00028899495,0.0011454572,0.029622665,0.003562059,0.0063748932,0.0052829273,0.0005004623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005111497,0.00008899582,0.042117268,0.00022418356,0.00002969025,0.0014799926,0.77342904,0.0002001146,0.0014657917,0.12333803,0.0069308076,0.050645057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027497028,0.0001365976,0.06536756,0.0010484421,0.00004658336,0.00084347505,0.6618193,0.0003179587,0.0012589947,0.03071012,0.23832558,0.000097827506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4153579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6093931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4153579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021187468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044348903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82588047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5348346","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04561.x","title":"Examining the Creation of Common Law Police Powers in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04453032803495625,"score_gpt":0.30630372237106257,"score_spread":0.2617733943361063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5348346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510958,0.00076528033,0.0002968459,0.008265505,0.00003864722,0.00009937403,0.00049111707,0.00001010912,0.03893728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950871,0.00029818903,0.00018499888,0.00031827748,0.000005343714,0.0000128960055,0.00009616902,0.0000050528893,0.003991986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334985,0.0008573141,0.00017757685,0.00046365173,0.0018170626,0.003334503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736689,0.005239741,0.002278085,0.0006943118,0.013070246,0.0050487453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036265359,0.00021972344,0.0005524847,0.0045217364,0.018975578,0.008008853,0.0024922998,0.0016864762,0.0051601618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02969133,0.0005530925,0.00045553016,0.0062848763,0.005499582,0.0025075842,0.0037427102,0.0029984927,0.00022134314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002977899,0.00033117936,0.6589119,0.00023489908,0.0002231803,0.0012167911,0.079893954,0.0026627153,0.00045145443,0.1754811,0.025325792,0.054969203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059092046,0.0000786843,0.73461556,0.00031073167,0.00018113233,0.00015152428,0.18907958,0.0031245968,0.00066801533,0.0063131195,0.06531324,0.000104752595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99809295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20266895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20266895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3021176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.924791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565481306","doi":"","title":"Criminal law, evidence and procedure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis Butterworths eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Index (typography); Common law; Statement (logic); Table of contents; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08044698336053552,"score_gpt":0.32789383697281177,"score_spread":0.24744685361227625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565481306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020290066,0.054207146,0.02790963,0.0481663,0.00743081,0.0012854505,0.002783356,0.0005925534,0.85559565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09157979,0.058207717,0.04823551,0.035125796,0.010407034,0.003173647,0.003764393,0.0006689105,0.74883723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789368,0.00816925,0.0019780751,0.0022934084,0.007707518,0.0009151364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850884,0.0071449406,0.0007716337,0.002932787,0.00338795,0.00067434093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013737985,0.000856995,0.0013234459,0.0061858213,0.0048748692,0.016477678,0.0024061769,0.0056719086,0.030849705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040599853,0.0007576784,0.0004345582,0.004628095,0.012002831,0.009389152,0.005683689,0.005500701,0.026810981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020593017,0.000024122422,0.00028943142,0.00030910285,0.000007761173,0.00014115853,0.001023922,0.00018208673,0.00011375641,0.6067652,0.28817865,0.10294421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047762755,0.00001912337,0.00041924082,0.0007264933,0.0000037431078,0.0001868566,0.00045557992,0.000105994455,0.000078501726,0.117699206,0.8802861,0.000014428415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008506946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008065096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030849705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006347114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015646446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10320252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W571158780","doi":"10.1007/0-306-48059-x","title":"Hazardous Decisions: Hazardous Waste Siting in the UK, The Netherlands and Canada. Institutions and Discourses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hazardous waste; Control (management); Competition (biology); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Quality (philosophy); Relation (database); Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Environmental planning; Engineering; Management; Economics; Waste management; Geography","score_opus":0.06383298863076835,"score_gpt":0.31571271296529835,"score_spread":0.25187972433453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W571158780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24909009,0.040971246,0.001876693,0.07251036,0.0007480784,0.000092597125,0.0014205904,0.00005125363,0.6332391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8783639,0.011799219,0.00078084075,0.0020561018,0.00006674227,0.00004680837,0.00046275815,0.00005670072,0.10636684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972187,0.00071635796,0.00009070751,0.00014565788,0.00097552326,0.0008530272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698204,0.0015404293,0.00031790193,0.00006782376,0.00075019064,0.00034156383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020943237,0.00051176664,0.00040847124,0.002944551,0.017325163,0.010956347,0.0023946124,0.0033588458,0.0070055304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064675114,0.00036327148,0.0002510455,0.008409943,0.0178211,0.0047361376,0.0040296195,0.002375095,0.00053561485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075428434,0.00003562854,0.00505628,0.00026774761,0.00001945106,0.0012077881,0.37506646,0.0012832963,0.00022034286,0.44470203,0.12775636,0.044309143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010764963,0.00001229782,0.018619252,0.0009610207,0.000023181845,0.0001704389,0.5640503,0.0004535438,0.00038875875,0.024420302,0.39081568,0.000074357835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0942692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0942692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08538959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68397415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W573957308","doi":"10.71781/23448","title":"Dissuasion, sécurité routière et inférence causale : le cas des actions policières contre la délinquance routière","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09390357935863057,"score_gpt":0.4311661752307846,"score_spread":0.337262595872154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W573957308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5359702,0.032353327,0.25147417,0.07977888,0.0034492216,0.0017904773,0.0039518527,0.00065151893,0.090580314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96248066,0.0027506978,0.021587024,0.0033520856,0.00051054277,0.00057007355,0.0003944544,0.000069406895,0.00828505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613957,0.027155831,0.0010985268,0.005655284,0.0033801722,0.0013144905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72563815,0.24868438,0.013031431,0.0058758464,0.0054303636,0.001339836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040674075,0.0011808133,0.0016579129,0.001986871,0.0024342153,0.0046399185,0.0021780285,0.0027924054,0.013365948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1583446,0.0006952685,0.0028140806,0.0018343899,0.0069525735,0.0045060567,0.003030342,0.004707099,0.00066707574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025647855,0.0007143161,0.39458382,0.004025467,0.009351944,0.0026847133,0.010244814,0.021265466,0.0013396213,0.42411068,0.012465135,0.11664926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009452986,0.0010967815,0.20290431,0.0027099536,0.008313663,0.0008544965,0.009060494,0.08761069,0.002968641,0.63375056,0.049454726,0.0003303755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15610676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080737084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15610676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007490745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012557248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31039625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W575126043","doi":"","title":"Failing to Heed Blackstone: A 50 Year Review of Tougher Sentences for Impaired Driving in Canada and How the Judiciary Strives to Avoid Their Imposition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forum on public policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Conviction; Punishment (psychology); Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029751241814343583,"score_gpt":0.31945915372654865,"score_spread":0.2897079119122051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W575126043","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016756542,0.98955977,0.000031386313,0.007638437,0.0017460395,0.000009185292,0.00007923629,0.0000056208937,0.00076269533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025148205,0.9883553,0.00012353991,0.0063536614,0.001869233,0.000012581665,0.00012452784,0.000012953793,0.00063340436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943386,0.00072505523,0.00080492656,0.00055547367,0.002975259,0.0006007658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483872,0.009922872,0.004426379,0.00055373524,0.033348735,0.0033610899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008418879,0.001040321,0.0021894523,0.018387375,0.0031291875,0.005986356,0.003640723,0.003985407,0.0037372059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029555505,0.001046148,0.0011770014,0.02492651,0.0053841975,0.0032222008,0.0016015123,0.005242235,0.00089245697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011364522,0.00007034462,0.0038546058,0.032865684,0.00026655194,0.00027831082,0.0014235476,0.00025811655,0.00022248067,0.0057727955,0.45495284,0.49992108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017922912,0.00007308278,0.018099254,0.047755342,0.00023701957,0.00040552477,0.00070450554,0.00007102454,0.0000881803,0.00042717325,0.93202376,0.00009721299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87032336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9398098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12967664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056801893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1408438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4121285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577856475","doi":"","title":"Portalis c. Bentham ? Les objectifs assignés à la codification du droit civil et du droit pénal en France, en Angleterre et au Canada","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006564801000858904,"score_gpt":0.19080876137318808,"score_spread":0.18424396037232918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W577856475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06784955,0.054199673,0.007728716,0.39723706,0.007392121,0.00010321482,0.0029847363,0.0006996387,0.46180522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39979196,0.02808357,0.006233423,0.019725585,0.0015769621,0.00009595474,0.0006930185,0.00055208744,0.54324734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969631,0.0007511571,0.00015517081,0.00038066992,0.0013667363,0.0003831581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171454,0.0035746244,0.00055963505,0.00045915353,0.0028948206,0.0007972833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030403663,0.00038384684,0.00052306673,0.002703771,0.005371012,0.007815482,0.0011435247,0.0032282192,0.04012986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025898263,0.00047192595,0.00030461274,0.0029198702,0.0021182871,0.0042090295,0.0022010952,0.0030040117,0.0045657996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014290836,0.00004546942,0.0152883455,0.00035602995,0.00004288682,0.00094445987,0.006468983,0.00042573386,0.00039590962,0.2884323,0.36411119,0.32334584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026368423,0.000031379586,0.027044948,0.00095705653,0.000038275783,0.0006857426,0.008727182,0.0007788413,0.0013373091,0.025854113,0.93443197,0.00008671141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5094017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.585773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49059832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067770104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013941034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98697513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58126738","doi":"10.3406/aijc.2010.1991","title":"Vingt-cinq ans de droit pénal canadien «constitutionnalisé» : la désillusion ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.0134209020538385,"score_gpt":0.3018022740844395,"score_spread":0.288381372030601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58126738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31099817,0.05195415,0.0019649514,0.40009776,0.014223686,0.0001277863,0.0019844936,0.00008488084,0.2185642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7967817,0.015018768,0.0013449147,0.056733284,0.001723248,0.0002220371,0.0009699513,0.00011679661,0.12708922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959857,0.0010132984,0.00025984945,0.00048604497,0.00078549347,0.0014695481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507695,0.0015376846,0.0007559825,0.00046845074,0.0011661223,0.0009947347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004988533,0.00027849816,0.00064525555,0.0010111025,0.0063511096,0.0056605446,0.0012880862,0.0041733226,0.011039722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016943911,0.0003850453,0.00041327355,0.0017104823,0.004079827,0.0042717517,0.0049035368,0.012684139,0.0009951039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033897962,0.00015964812,0.03224916,0.0005067451,0.00013747378,0.0017129148,0.04997347,0.0002937392,0.0011648481,0.66563183,0.10819579,0.13963535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049701182,0.000108328386,0.11238427,0.0015498018,0.00007416635,0.0007520865,0.026172096,0.00018445673,0.00074734265,0.034361463,0.82352203,0.0000943062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22869003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3856566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009684191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01834969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45471781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58936539","doi":"10.29173/alr28","title":"You Don't Know What You've Got 'Til It's Gone: The Rule of Law in Canada - Part I","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Theme (computing); Law; Historicity (philosophy); Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; History; Economics","score_opus":0.05963767548372212,"score_gpt":0.32230814965598353,"score_spread":0.2626704741722614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58936539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03672632,0.630737,0.0010658781,0.15856448,0.002701164,0.00010278321,0.0007656083,0.000036493944,0.16930027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48964432,0.43104354,0.0015503196,0.024712902,0.0005532199,0.000049951588,0.00055567943,0.00005221529,0.051837884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326766,0.0007081216,0.00029313267,0.00043960617,0.003963106,0.0013284044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98764634,0.0030578233,0.00083540136,0.0001963442,0.0071782386,0.0010856739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039401203,0.00032696527,0.0006532914,0.0037521857,0.008943743,0.007947,0.0024959145,0.002814688,0.0028479982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015932791,0.00036612435,0.00036369287,0.009651024,0.0076060276,0.0022332508,0.0014354214,0.0037253476,0.0002622418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076890465,0.00006292493,0.015095612,0.003943055,0.00016246927,0.00096215523,0.015317107,0.0015302786,0.00042718556,0.49631348,0.2710018,0.19510704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002218264,0.000041548446,0.054533686,0.0042426246,0.00020890924,0.0004303255,0.01627777,0.0008116987,0.00040613045,0.02075011,0.90212417,0.00015084611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99810684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16213314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16213314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33149272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97180676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59773144","doi":"","title":"Entrapment and Equality in Terrorism Prosecutions: A Comparative Examination of North American and European Approaches","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commit; Political science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Politics; Law; Human rights; Entrapment; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.060080895162219955,"score_gpt":0.3208121352356987,"score_spread":0.2607312400734787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59773144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5171493,0.05321099,0.002848435,0.026429256,0.0005278782,0.00007831922,0.00004472814,0.000022935623,0.39968807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737707,0.011013869,0.0007988516,0.008752985,0.00019594912,0.000044134977,0.000027455406,0.000019920453,0.005376087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97856176,0.010422115,0.0010945379,0.0014801782,0.00509332,0.0033481233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744622,0.013830773,0.0034187837,0.0012734514,0.0052907923,0.0017239995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022557009,0.00025549412,0.0004949928,0.005955782,0.01029239,0.01002717,0.0019105852,0.0044768704,0.002318256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02315943,0.00038702646,0.0007769809,0.006271775,0.011738088,0.004318791,0.006769264,0.003578845,0.00020897592],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036776194,0.00033694285,0.03205139,0.0005748407,0.00015562963,0.0014319182,0.093988135,0.00056317257,0.0009797206,0.6945138,0.00675332,0.16828333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001791849,0.0007521277,0.32834715,0.005019646,0.00046018846,0.0034827685,0.18342584,0.0011882987,0.003287657,0.06669379,0.40679038,0.0003729121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042224366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10873441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042224366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009983678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00863407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119294286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W602574368","doi":"","title":"Criminal law in Canada : an introduction to the theoretical, social and legal contexts : cases, notes and materials","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03304165243929784,"score_gpt":0.28490308997511227,"score_spread":0.2518614375358144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W602574368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015479305,0.16255519,0.005368501,0.054669105,0.0042363587,0.0009946154,0.00963648,0.0005629968,0.7464976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09210006,0.1891337,0.010480787,0.011817041,0.0011015906,0.00075820327,0.0052611064,0.00041977514,0.68892777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987117,0.0001006058,0.00004598796,0.00008186076,0.0006838187,0.0003760219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880075,0.0002954326,0.000043287284,0.000030699553,0.00061887753,0.00021089126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091705745,0.001067824,0.00068315555,0.006415826,0.012465897,0.0072128945,0.002413509,0.003685063,0.030923853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024472321,0.0008095804,0.0005838461,0.015279714,0.004439635,0.0027019868,0.0017033111,0.0024560075,0.0029287003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010604302,0.00009009858,0.00095768186,0.0005561209,0.0000053224335,0.0002907655,0.0028515547,0.0007788691,0.00019851608,0.14532676,0.7478232,0.101110496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000532368,0.000014351924,0.006197144,0.000704337,0.000010510311,0.00023014643,0.0038587123,0.0002906802,0.00021355638,0.011379827,0.9770438,0.000051657047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09630716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09630716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14686458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6987606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630040309","doi":"","title":"The Criminal's Handbook: A Practical Guide to Surviving Arrest and Incarceration in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Etiquette; Guard (computer science); Criminology; Criminal justice; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Psychology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.027425894229628114,"score_gpt":0.3510637366144426,"score_spread":0.3236378423848145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630040309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024990113,0.04829322,0.0056033763,0.014835227,0.003911694,0.00054744433,0.008296209,0.002487553,0.91352624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051057204,0.03196573,0.0073111965,0.0019406768,0.00016724509,0.00013187584,0.002687917,0.00045466484,0.9502351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993993,0.00002579097,0.000020154088,0.000035997757,0.00041802978,0.000100703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993606,0.000047771828,0.000019487336,0.000014275265,0.00042311367,0.0001345908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035146708,0.0009809321,0.0005753598,0.00279684,0.0062006605,0.003955984,0.0016164775,0.0014535749,0.07323123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013212595,0.00049968576,0.0003214114,0.0046793856,0.0009506168,0.0015774417,0.0012683547,0.001728801,0.031783674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031364902,0.000017612272,0.00017882044,0.00008526406,8.818018e-7,0.00007635233,0.00056806987,0.00013399599,0.00007032732,0.0039593466,0.89769125,0.09721493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.8402e-7,0.0000032028854,0.0005034829,0.000098037606,9.4485716e-7,0.00007841101,0.00041438147,0.00004231813,0.000021309923,0.00033718802,0.99849284,0.0000070660285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91416883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9782186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085831165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019609272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05820445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24498284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63443872","doi":"","title":"21. An Equality-Oriented Approach to the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Sexual Assault Prosecutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.14263734055100932,"score_gpt":0.383432579460353,"score_spread":0.24079523890934365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63443872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022039494,0.0055420315,0.081942625,0.18303299,0.0036847482,0.0008256648,0.0010062221,0.00021212999,0.70171416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69652706,0.0022289404,0.094505325,0.11983784,0.0057007405,0.0019748823,0.0003464222,0.00017275085,0.07870595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93540925,0.025461659,0.006561571,0.009710579,0.01600778,0.0068492666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91836786,0.05692743,0.00352903,0.0059066606,0.013430484,0.0018386298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04376409,0.0012548956,0.002889302,0.0071791997,0.013446062,0.013774743,0.007544506,0.049056925,0.011424493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09142182,0.0019111725,0.0042467033,0.002248015,0.034711946,0.013187225,0.010018252,0.021441353,0.0026789936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046446614,0.000049825336,0.00058022543,0.00008316217,0.00006433529,0.00026821406,0.00093871105,0.00027474354,0.00015976116,0.983881,0.007952716,0.0057008076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015932835,0.0001287047,0.0026557564,0.0005991175,0.00029186127,0.0007428751,0.0007479801,0.0018364057,0.0015078592,0.92746043,0.063691504,0.00017819731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017608661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028289923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049056925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007811796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01116561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23144937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644065874","doi":"10.5040/9781474202220","title":"Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11068102907618442,"score_gpt":0.3713923294949639,"score_spread":0.2607113004187795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644065874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00558284,0.076066464,0.0014578445,0.024340264,0.0013051158,0.00001997004,0.000056128956,0.000022384611,0.89114904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6666506,0.10793045,0.0032174208,0.028977867,0.006419166,0.000345567,0.00031590427,0.00014431035,0.18599862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939481,0.0040163957,0.00013426009,0.0003908591,0.0007736494,0.000736769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966755,0.0020413788,0.00021663704,0.00023014775,0.00058301014,0.0002534053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043651997,0.0006573547,0.00079837383,0.005315504,0.008601768,0.011732934,0.001798673,0.0049193883,0.016136702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006747057,0.00033765333,0.00046069484,0.00533127,0.023344677,0.010348672,0.0051720473,0.006374542,0.0015517186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032831833,0.000010140575,0.00010138812,0.00006958979,0.0000033451267,0.00006829641,0.0046106367,0.00004960611,0.000019800753,0.97681785,0.012805223,0.0054407096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006657018,0.000032821943,0.0013500296,0.000985206,0.000008976991,0.00028033362,0.014561635,0.00013306268,0.00005336222,0.1984346,0.78413993,0.000013482256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01459487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018040558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016136702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015608302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035228094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11324668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648019763","doi":"","title":"The Law of Public Inquiries in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06595487874010127,"score_gpt":0.30445275902244706,"score_spread":0.2384978802823458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648019763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006975344,0.015395721,0.0048926966,0.055992942,0.0011073432,0.00016766651,0.0010443133,0.00018314875,0.9142409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19093354,0.011498885,0.003281371,0.01411712,0.00071680103,0.00017322475,0.0003646929,0.0002319633,0.77868235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887692,0.0011570596,0.00034204117,0.00082683755,0.006131279,0.002773644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886862,0.004047874,0.0002695721,0.0005033552,0.00558736,0.00090554176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051964084,0.0007278142,0.00102804,0.0033860127,0.019601177,0.020071141,0.0035273768,0.009009677,0.015604642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023334622,0.001696677,0.00071611605,0.006399657,0.012855303,0.00405127,0.0025600682,0.009672472,0.0017671206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001108375,0.000013046193,0.00063497724,0.000043572494,0.000011624446,0.000118421085,0.0013917107,0.0007068681,0.000039743114,0.8356316,0.14550535,0.01589207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033531207,0.000013852285,0.0041021896,0.0004987731,0.000065792825,0.00014873873,0.0022456127,0.0035821258,0.00024993168,0.18069074,0.80823684,0.00013180688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99661523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1565774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1565774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2847703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651559902","doi":"","title":"Youth crime and youth justice : comparative and cross-national perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.14706786000808927,"score_gpt":0.4097403561255992,"score_spread":0.26267249611751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651559902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04477251,0.28017494,0.0021195763,0.026169375,0.0011387018,0.000018125202,0.00029164765,0.00004210363,0.64527303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60442907,0.2706144,0.0031602683,0.0039995834,0.00083198556,0.00010979147,0.0006666643,0.00009052774,0.11609773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960107,0.00016310762,0.000015212054,0.000030464247,0.00009304411,0.00009708043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994836,0.00031143124,0.00004762013,0.000019731358,0.00008204624,0.000055440974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007676175,0.00039148642,0.0004324882,0.0033134145,0.003085289,0.004618207,0.0005413938,0.0009507309,0.0038540435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086531165,0.00015285007,0.00036483412,0.0056187175,0.003971449,0.0038470475,0.00201911,0.0012713985,0.00024901686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023838387,0.00003515205,0.007393089,0.00035717143,0.000028251176,0.0007660445,0.03632226,0.0005007479,0.00011089279,0.7654191,0.07584,0.11320348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006232085,0.000038258117,0.02954792,0.0022225955,0.00007216866,0.0017113108,0.07815946,0.00051137805,0.00027519508,0.10456477,0.78286755,0.000023153436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054763544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15084273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054763544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004078043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030795608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10888958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658376493","doi":"","title":"La preuve électronique : étude de droit comparé Afrique, Europe, Afrique [i.e. Canada]","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03559857921521,"score_gpt":0.27501662936261584,"score_spread":0.23941805014740583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658376493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051993866,0.21415035,0.013159211,0.020205177,0.001377986,0.000116277384,0.0034323446,0.0001789595,0.69538575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45146278,0.08301112,0.012949539,0.0021920707,0.0003540671,0.000120073695,0.0015138874,0.00029460576,0.44810185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981744,0.00029674429,0.000047563382,0.00014477271,0.0010979404,0.00023856518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974638,0.001141344,0.00010978862,0.000085477775,0.0011342334,0.00006538196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022228442,0.0004600776,0.000613369,0.0053787283,0.004564677,0.0062871366,0.0011796571,0.001194623,0.011766947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058244257,0.00027758387,0.00034686978,0.010729442,0.004831686,0.0033213573,0.0010987086,0.0014255308,0.00082753174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063853455,0.000021797143,0.0058436496,0.0004239636,0.000045861838,0.00023527593,0.011309298,0.0005998938,0.00029298957,0.66840947,0.101568185,0.21118571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000892784,0.000028002674,0.030868262,0.0010817898,0.0000402246,0.0006633124,0.012481624,0.0005136062,0.0009179206,0.075800315,0.87754786,0.00004821684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8206345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9098647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17936552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02623124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028659038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36084366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6917657969","doi":"10.58066/wrbe-kc83","title":"British Columbia Blackout - No. 84","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blackout; Directory; Poison control; Freedom of information","score_opus":0.04156115123080675,"score_gpt":0.3060355223850873,"score_spread":0.2644743711542805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6917657969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036763214,0.0015919534,0.00010498669,0.005724647,0.0013044483,0.00009757563,0.027741322,0.00027814048,0.9594806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002275939,0.00022980361,0.00003003976,0.000547835,0.000021321091,0.0000138008845,0.001794277,0.00004899913,0.995038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963033,0.000016827207,0.000013423627,0.00006561244,0.00014555966,0.0001282941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999074,0.00005727817,0.00002733296,0.00006757673,0.0005993551,0.00017454242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035348546,0.00051991554,0.00037828233,0.0012224906,0.0051704235,0.0023751594,0.0010026585,0.0019810966,0.48588228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086892355,0.00047383693,0.00023694591,0.0018258152,0.0005013568,0.00071509107,0.00079750136,0.0015053493,0.20794554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034347977,0.000018034172,0.0005392655,0.000046305802,0.0000019311055,0.0000645347,0.000047331272,0.00001867567,0.00012187686,0.0013524469,0.9827643,0.014990881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009256552,0.0000068403015,0.0046548313,0.00007115669,0.0000025127852,0.000019676027,0.00018519019,0.000029276402,0.00016573357,0.00017565991,0.99467236,0.000007472829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8061439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95096856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48588228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008768741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015473837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73332655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920597455","doi":"10.60770/pev6-vx16","title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Evolving Evidentiary Rule","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Constitution; Criticism; Test (biology); State (computer science); Scope (computer science); Section (typography)","score_opus":0.020749477452289097,"score_gpt":0.28555443043237116,"score_spread":0.26480495298008205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920597455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024530038,0.031726167,0.026512915,0.12298481,0.0018668385,0.0004361116,0.0012351782,0.00014634289,0.7905616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73519653,0.02955274,0.043693915,0.054336097,0.0013893652,0.00037701888,0.00078652456,0.0001740916,0.1344936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749614,0.0018359976,0.0004416693,0.0013949847,0.017453583,0.0039124223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889894,0.0035031212,0.00053779996,0.000556476,0.0057243328,0.0006888529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01115772,0.00084613543,0.0008477596,0.0051772264,0.017349647,0.017787546,0.0036438776,0.0070234383,0.0031701562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015040023,0.0009578358,0.0013324338,0.0057630325,0.026421122,0.0054383283,0.0022903865,0.011162368,0.00054524053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040828554,0.000008556176,0.00030969686,0.000047750513,0.000004938522,0.00012431623,0.0018981855,0.0005469726,0.00016861001,0.9734281,0.015112382,0.008346368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014862275,0.000033292345,0.008387642,0.0011218821,0.000047927355,0.00015726723,0.0039797453,0.001943984,0.000869585,0.3107498,0.6724586,0.0002354684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97712153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98665154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13511886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13511886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28859282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6961026974","doi":"10.14288/1.0400188","title":"British Columbia’s Bicycle Helmet Charter Challenge : Regina vs. van der Eerden (April 2011 – January 2013)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01767324015405441,"score_gpt":0.21486857433805512,"score_spread":0.1971953341840007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6961026974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053907212,0.06467729,0.0004939466,0.44582698,0.010463393,0.00026675913,0.0036041155,0.00011512789,0.42064515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34914905,0.04040058,0.00084955763,0.23247677,0.002154942,0.0002577983,0.0018892422,0.000151172,0.372671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909725,0.00087035703,0.00036539373,0.0008759377,0.004891332,0.002024542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98496026,0.0044619404,0.0006724179,0.00044121256,0.007861613,0.0016025085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008327706,0.0004881323,0.00068659824,0.0026419542,0.018667117,0.011051436,0.0028721525,0.009984108,0.008360695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026486807,0.000895622,0.0005310921,0.0039958064,0.0042423466,0.0022401677,0.0023828049,0.011323273,0.0014705537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007890699,0.00003953996,0.00442854,0.00032443224,0.000048613976,0.00054733874,0.004152147,0.00021191794,0.00022330717,0.018421046,0.9328274,0.03869681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000372639,0.000043295615,0.049834732,0.0024689848,0.00014349104,0.00017578827,0.01279608,0.00019675659,0.00066681404,0.0023074376,0.9311798,0.00014953555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96043396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99028087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06732421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06732421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09640803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48847365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981259741","doi":"","title":"The economic agent and its representation(s)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Paris; Région Normandie; University of Cape Town; Université de Montréal; Université de Strasbourg; Simon Fraser University; Helsingin Yliopisto; University of Hertfordshire; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Oxford; Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne; Università degli Studi di Milano; George Mason University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.05723648447475314,"score_gpt":0.33827749870104384,"score_spread":0.2810410142262907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981259741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020057393,0.0036443064,0.036233116,0.04561994,0.0011359811,0.00005400455,0.00078263594,0.000116553536,0.89235604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69674957,0.004458937,0.009686157,0.0020446046,0.0014031618,0.00011582435,0.00038278708,0.00011143797,0.28504753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964914,0.0018482099,0.00019015982,0.00044779392,0.0007498815,0.0002725244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995014,0.002554955,0.00056497176,0.0008823905,0.000660375,0.00032337476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004121529,0.00036095755,0.0005597373,0.0018901413,0.0015565138,0.012067114,0.0011030834,0.0045007807,0.031039415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015225939,0.00023755757,0.0003574181,0.0025070081,0.003914478,0.006995215,0.002195138,0.003620271,0.004109032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000493176,0.00001074334,0.0001591877,0.000012032509,0.000003392236,0.000016963415,0.00010313337,0.00018834186,0.00001640662,0.98698735,0.0056442455,0.0068533625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069329217,0.000008127963,0.00050839514,0.00010293701,0.000012786581,0.0000985015,0.00036105013,0.003344653,0.0001955252,0.89301825,0.102332,0.000010976146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031391585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023920303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031039415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003063053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003455664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10383719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981658142","doi":"","title":"ESPN-TV! Edmonton Oilers vs Buffalo Sabres Live Streaming","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Identification (biology); Key (lock); Terminal (telecommunication)","score_opus":0.021829603843049612,"score_gpt":0.2957765725151596,"score_spread":0.27394696867211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981658142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027699252,0.00040198953,0.00045415526,0.0060935626,0.0011712349,0.00005447106,0.008815557,0.0014546085,0.9787846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026476573,0.00046490238,0.0008912566,0.002496326,0.0007778966,0.000092903225,0.007006888,0.0016215225,0.96017176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991517,0.00013666878,0.000021173137,0.00009944317,0.00040443454,0.00018650344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627966,0.0011380626,0.0001389611,0.00049921835,0.0011434554,0.00080061133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017158991,0.0003880574,0.00031057556,0.0011978677,0.0015417887,0.004541313,0.0010277643,0.0018557365,0.6987249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009795992,0.00025334785,0.00036187717,0.0009393543,0.00056391204,0.0031058753,0.0021717553,0.0017465724,0.23069888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024529613,0.000029456021,0.00020997346,0.00004439899,0.000002900149,0.000017797109,0.000064382424,0.000038781367,0.00006730306,0.004206712,0.9529165,0.042156573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013581921,0.000044529643,0.0025025709,0.00017943923,0.00001113379,0.00003580467,0.00047993232,0.00028473503,0.00032237117,0.0032905384,0.9926963,0.000016775279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029706838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054539144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30127507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016186706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020743387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42973232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981764086","doi":"","title":"Extradition and Trial Delays: Recent Developments (and Lessons?) from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Paragraph; Charter; Human rights; State (computer science); Odds; Fair trial; Bad faith","score_opus":0.05376176113869135,"score_gpt":0.31137781618601656,"score_spread":0.2576160550473252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981764086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0795522,0.3194174,0.0016931463,0.41136125,0.002900275,0.00013686602,0.0024294995,0.000088451656,0.18242094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53759956,0.37974495,0.0029133253,0.054371756,0.0013561439,0.00006382325,0.0013753826,0.00012664958,0.022448417],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907827,0.00079249934,0.0005549807,0.00089942507,0.004868371,0.0021020272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446507,0.016956126,0.0037624962,0.0010822464,0.026554253,0.0069941855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008650992,0.0004926583,0.0010601034,0.0051536104,0.0100622615,0.012496558,0.0035913459,0.0037108948,0.008613308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028342037,0.0006695042,0.00083815743,0.015350235,0.010729437,0.0031794277,0.0034255206,0.0071785944,0.00042162594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035119633,0.00022051162,0.04072563,0.004216149,0.00015964756,0.0019014503,0.020118572,0.002451188,0.000519605,0.2844123,0.20737593,0.43754786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072160394,0.00011091676,0.11206369,0.0074957944,0.00032060107,0.00089048635,0.0331055,0.0010810324,0.0007685607,0.015953353,0.82770824,0.00042960857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99771225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18737616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18737616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35435686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9425285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981782572","doi":"","title":"+91-9116799099 family problem solution specialist in ottawa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bengali; MAGIC (telescope); Cheating; Kali; Phone","score_opus":0.033605578069996214,"score_gpt":0.30930744935841903,"score_spread":0.27570187128842283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981782572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016586334,0.0008250525,0.00032719068,0.012318097,0.002228667,0.0002073012,0.0028047746,0.0012327685,0.9783975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013886419,0.0002645189,0.0002057519,0.0008930622,0.00004074414,0.000026853808,0.00040378195,0.00014156761,0.99663514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988059,0.00010098336,0.000057779984,0.0002542305,0.0004051881,0.0003759419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932482,0.00026313448,0.00011493827,0.0002328971,0.0021229126,0.0040178453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007163037,0.0012475972,0.0008169229,0.0009796371,0.0059522935,0.0050307666,0.0017897545,0.0034300685,0.88064635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030602743,0.00066574576,0.0005837643,0.0010306569,0.0010648242,0.0024508855,0.004156907,0.0019486878,0.7286213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002837213,0.000044187436,0.00029710704,0.00006054551,0.000002195438,0.000094593335,0.00013118476,0.000026174199,0.0002267664,0.00036704118,0.97524434,0.023477549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011384373,0.000022174774,0.0010436209,0.00007099122,0.0000036744705,0.00008608161,0.0007548266,0.000041679257,0.00007757374,0.000121874655,0.99775714,0.000008999393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16790672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50350606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16790672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064235753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015007832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33385873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986900776","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Public law; Comparative law; International law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Proportionality (law)","score_opus":0.10143523433243229,"score_gpt":0.35782855323386004,"score_spread":0.25639331890142775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986900776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027415052,0.10878735,0.0140789375,0.336133,0.0037120925,0.00006875884,0.0003635758,0.00012403367,0.50931734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7527695,0.116662346,0.018183654,0.032653537,0.0015246822,0.000143653,0.0002930634,0.00027151176,0.077498086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214774,0.0022918233,0.00021970566,0.0007373651,0.0029911285,0.0016122585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909445,0.0036421462,0.0003280141,0.00036792704,0.0036282428,0.0010891265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007610931,0.0010502442,0.0012953085,0.011169385,0.029467262,0.020957753,0.0033818346,0.0048368224,0.006720659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008056122,0.00060898246,0.00091347715,0.016240845,0.07107172,0.011532546,0.005700745,0.009448233,0.0004973718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074928807,0.000009297141,0.00043180012,0.000087058346,0.000005120833,0.00006886212,0.015283853,0.00017023624,0.000041234474,0.9609447,0.013573628,0.009376736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001400134,0.000016224067,0.003168898,0.0009322151,0.00004144881,0.00014909246,0.046577938,0.0014383758,0.00014168715,0.38790566,0.5595268,0.00008769894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7770971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2229029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20554914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9013225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986925560","doi":"","title":"Release: 35th biennial Canadian Congress on Criminal Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.03453229721784231,"score_gpt":0.2738991105888982,"score_spread":0.2393668133710559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986925560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019044221,0.0032002337,0.0005783447,0.030085955,0.01551337,0.0017881468,0.040958054,0.0018703447,0.9041012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021493721,0.0003579164,0.00013468692,0.0027687133,0.0004964396,0.00022556096,0.0020494664,0.00017390816,0.99164397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371284,0.0001943455,0.00018379987,0.0003155321,0.003998095,0.0015952789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908388,0.00074549625,0.00015031768,0.00055283407,0.0058647357,0.0018477711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048466125,0.001650073,0.0018414177,0.006619273,0.013947254,0.014781061,0.0037136232,0.0109954905,0.31165463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142127285,0.0011859772,0.00172724,0.0038273279,0.0021003175,0.002838737,0.0035813418,0.0076808124,0.119043194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012050596,0.000012255748,0.000080914564,0.000021292615,0.0000027687706,0.00001397607,0.00003615208,0.000024844094,0.00003070883,0.0022013693,0.99403316,0.0035304888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021837797,0.000008086453,0.002709142,0.00009856505,0.000008016855,0.000008458374,0.0001726887,0.00006484132,0.00009926253,0.0007687026,0.9960127,0.000027842088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83915544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9349923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031007832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08807979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98184115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986970546","doi":"","title":"R v Fearon Case Commentary","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Law enforcement; Data Protection Act 1998; Search and seizure; Permission; Enforcement; Criminal law","score_opus":0.2618415846451397,"score_gpt":0.395712819689144,"score_spread":0.13387123504400433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986970546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035844108,0.005722609,0.00037139075,0.7061454,0.01580215,0.000096043535,0.00017549096,0.000104596846,0.26799783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03676053,0.0021533172,0.00022442381,0.88998646,0.0065955096,0.00012638861,0.00005081775,0.000060376704,0.064042255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99098665,0.0015927074,0.0003195809,0.0015989982,0.0027380432,0.0027640534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310476,0.0042142347,0.0002749759,0.00026805716,0.0011990815,0.00093886413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006115801,0.0011825705,0.0011564586,0.002386056,0.0211516,0.0074285627,0.005986195,0.060114693,0.02738599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02363055,0.0009241545,0.0021687152,0.0022923583,0.011460085,0.0054721856,0.005435356,0.031439327,0.004512919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017464477,0.000024511373,0.00019593947,0.00007920099,0.0000060047487,0.0024420423,0.0018350739,0.00006989496,0.00014970299,0.12382198,0.8658892,0.0054690368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027556473,0.000023431146,0.0005832287,0.0010698357,0.000028513214,0.0016686254,0.0032167293,0.00017744208,0.00021630057,0.03361004,0.9593038,0.00007443087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16765825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21763694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16765825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020414537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033075575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33336478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989525816","doi":"","title":"Beaudry: New Impetus Towards Equality in Law Enforcement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Supreme court; Conviction; Officer; Suspect; Criminal justice; Discretion; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.04820206146596288,"score_gpt":0.3517665639408504,"score_spread":0.3035645024748875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989525816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02377302,0.009435332,0.005571876,0.41476262,0.0021050633,0.00007392688,0.0001320453,0.00007114192,0.54407495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7392849,0.0044394834,0.0048640105,0.17803252,0.002450922,0.000081350874,0.00008531558,0.00007760963,0.07068393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787369,0.004363771,0.00048348255,0.0030663444,0.008733928,0.004615575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786052,0.010872545,0.00077686156,0.0027660085,0.00453408,0.0024453674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016949376,0.00035189875,0.0007596261,0.0017770038,0.013826278,0.0122313965,0.0030116588,0.0135986805,0.009943251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039937243,0.0004929796,0.00065041194,0.0015238551,0.053575628,0.009383331,0.009438862,0.015141988,0.0006005281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011708306,0.000011941408,0.000579106,0.000027672928,0.0000055651776,0.00011533521,0.0023143252,0.00008037832,0.00007370417,0.9678628,0.018856948,0.010060614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010486503,0.000055371933,0.0054529514,0.0005053731,0.000037756632,0.00028164673,0.0048833047,0.00044431098,0.0007958995,0.35410762,0.6332522,0.00007875449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5814387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68021756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5814387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028673405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05794164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8420525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989666937","doi":"","title":"Canadian Evidence Law in a Nutshell","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Common law; Statutory law; Subject (documents); Comparative law; Public law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.06565954398396258,"score_gpt":0.34215800116699735,"score_spread":0.2764984571830348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989666937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084652874,0.06316217,0.014204669,0.29085276,0.020013617,0.00038743936,0.0035585752,0.00081238005,0.6061619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0403181,0.089503676,0.061149724,0.21227431,0.0073359166,0.0005252432,0.0037324575,0.0010750523,0.5840855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755992,0.001681495,0.0014562795,0.0016430407,0.018098498,0.0015214623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96690327,0.0038234207,0.0006070269,0.0016076209,0.024563136,0.0024955457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012137777,0.0013204457,0.0013640112,0.009900289,0.010666269,0.02386358,0.004934671,0.0109313615,0.027187778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043608155,0.0015531301,0.0012927376,0.010919433,0.015169247,0.008974819,0.0054785577,0.012549457,0.010513047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055521887,0.000009210678,0.00014245514,0.000171076,0.000009712258,0.00008595033,0.0004878952,0.0001945761,0.00008745243,0.3672007,0.59695315,0.03465226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034670752,0.0000022864494,0.00018338056,0.00026508232,0.0000056874374,0.000042890988,0.00012532175,0.000079728816,0.000030377128,0.016589189,0.9826512,0.000021522152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92230767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94775766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09955623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09955623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23216616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7223344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990498251","doi":"","title":"De rol van de slachtofferadvocaat in het Nederlandse strafproces","year":2023,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Ven; European union; Holy See","score_opus":0.054110371793363365,"score_gpt":0.30884665580960213,"score_spread":0.25473628401623877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990498251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15987994,0.04425803,0.00809049,0.12130943,0.004447154,0.00030879123,0.0022367537,0.0003537511,0.65911573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35233676,0.022315502,0.007268888,0.019708062,0.00067971554,0.00024607594,0.0021828949,0.00032543903,0.5949366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246216,0.0014266178,0.00042438204,0.0008964843,0.0024884348,0.0023018955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943739,0.0010442092,0.00067716924,0.0003075153,0.0014484074,0.0021487293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004746571,0.0004235158,0.00050934753,0.0009903465,0.004287292,0.00784941,0.0014468168,0.0035628595,0.03144706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008549507,0.0004808393,0.0006137927,0.0011869502,0.002384904,0.0035984614,0.004346204,0.0045491424,0.005892429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000427334,0.00034732217,0.022868333,0.0015005248,0.000057235844,0.0026622664,0.024845583,0.0012178431,0.0064418693,0.34890082,0.29827762,0.29245323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011271808,0.000053738186,0.005909287,0.00048890297,0.000009813742,0.00015456101,0.004076127,0.000066023684,0.00044775885,0.0017447076,0.98701394,0.000023804685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16946091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20097438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16946091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009625257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027838694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33694905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991875723","doi":"","title":"Independence and the Director of\\nPublic Prosecutions: The Marshall Inquiry\\nand Beyond","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Nova scotia; Government (linguistics); Control (management)","score_opus":0.026859682381086165,"score_gpt":0.2954902920246089,"score_spread":0.26863060964352276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991875723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03401726,0.03216436,0.0009792437,0.43391404,0.0030792765,0.00009889774,0.0003247504,0.00008832115,0.49533388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32322043,0.013983172,0.00082041015,0.042944763,0.0011386158,0.00005750183,0.00013830817,0.000050329167,0.6176465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683917,0.00048915733,0.00009636628,0.00022302732,0.0012184714,0.0011338097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428904,0.001201072,0.0004364091,0.0002365388,0.0018106094,0.0020263132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023462577,0.00017578111,0.00023604104,0.0011095406,0.010273066,0.0067777075,0.0007719877,0.00270001,0.008690429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076856297,0.0003966659,0.00013390204,0.0011147908,0.003961333,0.0015996218,0.0025678899,0.00409279,0.0013862592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048549242,0.00003270449,0.008165688,0.00013623571,0.0000082917795,0.0006405857,0.0076308604,0.00010811544,0.00045780293,0.26380077,0.6558579,0.063112505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008710033,0.000012883697,0.018621337,0.00022009251,0.000010692619,0.00014580657,0.004676317,0.00009878693,0.000305797,0.005022839,0.97085446,0.000022207429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6126411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82952344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6126411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020145696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050561108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77928025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992022858","doi":"","title":"Jailed by a \"black box\" : the impact of opaque algorithms on the right to a fair trial in the United States of America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to a fair trial; Fair trial; Opacity; New Right","score_opus":0.023238055569076,"score_gpt":0.2822950404001226,"score_spread":0.2590569848310466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992022858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5038131,0.0025102387,0.012103195,0.1373304,0.00070624804,0.00017407011,0.00026219874,0.00008325847,0.34301728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760325,0.00034317147,0.0009618251,0.0071830056,0.00010809233,0.000051011797,0.000021244166,0.000030977364,0.0036974626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96185625,0.026613936,0.0008214299,0.001980816,0.004388634,0.004339003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79632586,0.17394374,0.010077527,0.008017926,0.007437608,0.0041973586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052169636,0.00028177552,0.00078482146,0.0012798486,0.00744912,0.011402579,0.0021864625,0.0064009055,0.015660914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21911725,0.0005135361,0.00078586437,0.0015691394,0.020975424,0.008382676,0.005303487,0.012303075,0.0005687634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007590882,0.0003039361,0.020565083,0.00008625701,0.00010518828,0.00023512021,0.004830553,0.0042091087,0.00016318719,0.91281694,0.019980038,0.03594546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006424295,0.00031578797,0.030340696,0.0007020292,0.00041406747,0.00015488634,0.009445349,0.013863342,0.0011219715,0.90701914,0.03582299,0.00015741475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08910245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12228437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08910245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008305007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016744845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2759027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992542321","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v St. Clair&lt;/i&gt;","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Test (biology); Officer; Subpoena; Expert witness","score_opus":0.024858842165407805,"score_gpt":0.28581118991880666,"score_spread":0.26095234775339887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992542321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011200952,0.0037319262,0.00070701726,0.4249401,0.004698483,0.0003068682,0.0017368662,0.000339415,0.55233836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040257297,0.0008621635,0.0005767661,0.6548079,0.0012722655,0.00029117768,0.00032690426,0.00012228171,0.30148324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961073,0.00034485298,0.00013678317,0.00059348193,0.0014142132,0.001403276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650794,0.0014858993,0.00015398486,0.00014633765,0.0012330549,0.0004727434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027274536,0.00097532157,0.00062445685,0.0009811737,0.018241335,0.005619727,0.003308826,0.042526282,0.024075447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007679511,0.0015198418,0.0015286257,0.0009905339,0.0029724767,0.0018898768,0.0018083474,0.02223201,0.01053921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006769959,0.000035232726,0.0013406329,0.00006704386,0.000011526642,0.00066356966,0.0010876823,0.00008691507,0.00059344963,0.04034128,0.95191455,0.0037903974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009706954,0.00009743728,0.010402031,0.00038156207,0.00007041387,0.00038293892,0.001955457,0.0005839111,0.0011144152,0.008109478,0.9766495,0.00015572112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55633414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.791583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55633414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00900488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019031366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8925574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995820580","doi":"","title":"Placing Expediency Before Principle: An Empirical Analysis of the Joint Sentencing Practices of Canadian Crown Prosecutors and Defence Lawyers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Crown (dentistry); Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Empirical research","score_opus":0.048378754794063276,"score_gpt":0.3556598089897825,"score_spread":0.3072810541957192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995820580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962728,0.00010960138,0.00008927583,0.00044073505,0.0000057187744,0.000031974425,0.000031172556,0.0000019208437,0.003016826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982481,0.00015260198,0.0001908298,0.000116261755,0.000003861266,0.000019355315,0.000047027428,0.000004765059,0.0012172211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98142254,0.005384725,0.0009805566,0.0011004515,0.0065825963,0.0045291167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9198047,0.03738758,0.014112899,0.0019340517,0.021326818,0.0054340614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012052763,0.0003845534,0.00068129605,0.0045561614,0.018897649,0.005866473,0.0030887227,0.002536673,0.0030431254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121992484,0.0007397735,0.00027261322,0.0068935803,0.0073885047,0.0022003497,0.004365828,0.002647574,0.00032432145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000231936,0.00035076542,0.38759142,0.00009235706,0.000056860485,0.00058255455,0.5742539,0.0003660786,0.0005056319,0.0058698254,0.002365773,0.02773293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016000216,0.00009348411,0.53406596,0.00014985619,0.000048158952,0.00021138796,0.45737118,0.0007518525,0.00025898384,0.000585044,0.006377376,0.00007063977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9555587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044441283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04288161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09968765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31112927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998620211","doi":"","title":"Annual Review of Criminal Law 2020","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Criminal law; Criminal code; Criminal justice; Legislation; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.02863176121537044,"score_gpt":0.324158980091506,"score_spread":0.2955272188761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998620211","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029508505,0.6791062,0.00069080334,0.03608242,0.01485704,0.00011320187,0.00095800863,0.00011575672,0.2677816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008012877,0.6984479,0.001176635,0.014298572,0.0089551965,0.00019218959,0.0018365198,0.00010849871,0.26697162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484825,0.00083795347,0.0002885741,0.00037931415,0.0032850893,0.0003608419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918801,0.0013335453,0.0003903328,0.0004290161,0.00536115,0.0006057822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029779463,0.0007954065,0.00094884494,0.0062899855,0.0021022253,0.0060126516,0.0014227241,0.003206073,0.061039936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01163251,0.00041937997,0.00054920296,0.0057769697,0.0025045231,0.0037822654,0.0018375288,0.0030974124,0.032037105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004407049,0.0000077609675,0.00014995503,0.00040629,0.0000058318524,0.000027687458,0.00006527345,0.00006528292,0.000021315558,0.020766983,0.85922694,0.11925224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.1868357e-7,0.000002335144,0.00019910975,0.00059918984,0.0000012424916,0.000022745151,0.00002633715,0.000008873242,0.0000037851473,0.0010913655,0.998042,0.0000023193238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05200221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07426105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061039936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011545551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02129563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20419896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999564576","doi":"","title":"Cornell: A Divided Court Accords Too Much Latitude to the Police – 'Canada Is Not a Police State'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intimidation; Charter; Warrant; Jurisprudence; Entitlement (fair division); Suspect; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Criminal justice","score_opus":0.027437953519445342,"score_gpt":0.3013234704882355,"score_spread":0.27388551696879015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999564576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10622824,0.0031629044,0.0015404715,0.23207685,0.0025463756,0.00012632056,0.0005787844,0.00031208308,0.65342796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6437687,0.0007961468,0.0010265278,0.106423505,0.00036684837,0.00006344144,0.00017434744,0.000102588245,0.24727784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957217,0.00029806182,0.00008775504,0.00059793534,0.0015769447,0.001717596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973254,0.0006916922,0.000109467284,0.00012869733,0.0010076971,0.00073694537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017688712,0.00039301338,0.00028805883,0.0006544608,0.02390972,0.010364243,0.0015275518,0.008935859,0.0126539115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008753659,0.0004660426,0.00032101822,0.0008372125,0.006946703,0.0021500571,0.0019953458,0.0068937433,0.0010814246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009381154,0.000033849865,0.005428376,0.000052471616,0.00002206418,0.0014385177,0.009350514,0.0001865151,0.0014787228,0.39103228,0.56568354,0.025199391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007195983,0.000063745756,0.018108869,0.0002553987,0.00007067427,0.0003418062,0.011328355,0.0006543228,0.0011367992,0.018802527,0.94896364,0.00020190758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9676215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038625628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038625628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06796726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28024983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000505167","doi":"","title":"Europees Hof tikt België opnieuw op de vingers voor fnuiken gerechtsjournalistiek","year":2023,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.05394763368925882,"score_gpt":0.28618626676981335,"score_spread":0.23223863308055454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000505167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01272013,0.15840076,0.0015003599,0.099287204,0.01293801,0.00012116802,0.009029398,0.00053569576,0.7054673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04295221,0.02735685,0.0015777616,0.0062320326,0.001870943,0.00008342841,0.002483536,0.0003211289,0.9171221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623495,0.00072495214,0.00019236215,0.00042364592,0.0015946158,0.0008294644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995477,0.001234689,0.00057656126,0.0002886673,0.0011582886,0.0012647386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034990648,0.00061254296,0.00079692283,0.003567516,0.0044944696,0.009327437,0.0007494632,0.0031988004,0.1659971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008541641,0.00038341695,0.00051973993,0.0052024634,0.0026386431,0.003255329,0.0030310738,0.0032761886,0.03662063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008829466,0.000038096034,0.0011273642,0.00036928523,0.000017055467,0.00026508048,0.0015442843,0.00009572867,0.0005754352,0.06686435,0.86332375,0.06569128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027421456,0.0000037109012,0.0014981612,0.00009164423,0.0000027959709,0.00003300756,0.000277151,0.0000071527516,0.00007463403,0.00045401487,0.9975516,0.000003384545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09363321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1282694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1659971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008231398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01744135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5553156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000840301","doi":"","title":"Hart: More Positive Steps Needed to Rein In Mr. Big Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Balance (ability); Autonomy; Supreme court; Big data; Guard (computer science); State (computer science); Worry","score_opus":0.029876852699220077,"score_gpt":0.31170426600205003,"score_spread":0.28182741330282995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000840301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005224083,0.003948423,0.0016691806,0.8747267,0.00943128,0.00011049588,0.00013883311,0.00026252648,0.10448843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08854129,0.0025695723,0.0043025054,0.77801776,0.0047946926,0.00009089574,0.000105343104,0.0001477384,0.12143013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902064,0.0017217037,0.00032222352,0.0007642805,0.0041994783,0.0027859367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685735,0.005650746,0.0005209548,0.00076628383,0.0035611035,0.0026435836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009274023,0.00051122357,0.00061193283,0.00081026065,0.008520523,0.009523574,0.0029423232,0.023557007,0.013878324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023983283,0.00052461086,0.0009437617,0.0005158829,0.007612023,0.008624403,0.0032733341,0.017605124,0.0027668262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003708803,0.00006277677,0.0007501919,0.00006291606,0.000011231943,0.0004754288,0.0014695126,0.00016937223,0.00047578823,0.2748665,0.70218885,0.019430308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033241355,0.000060279177,0.0013043917,0.00019463811,0.000016658278,0.00013356184,0.001708726,0.00024206896,0.00029315945,0.018556751,0.97738326,0.000073270916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3940272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6096671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3940272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011051268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04079099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002076416","doi":"","title":"McNeil: A Welcome Clarification and Extension of Disclosure Principles: \"The Adversary System Has Lingered On","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Element (criminal law); Context (archaeology); Surprise; Comity; Duty; Mistake; Adversary","score_opus":0.051357759370072704,"score_gpt":0.29424984921878855,"score_spread":0.24289208984871585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002076416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014803427,0.0036002924,0.003095083,0.9449258,0.008989223,0.000050089227,0.00008303973,0.00008824406,0.037687972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049030557,0.0025711162,0.0072806515,0.84654325,0.0102296425,0.00023718984,0.00004769763,0.00018939842,0.0838705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97661006,0.009061853,0.001338251,0.004380102,0.005704833,0.0029048168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765654,0.015311376,0.0008045868,0.0014726757,0.004406273,0.0014397347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017753737,0.0012834724,0.0013759964,0.00093247695,0.014738311,0.023778722,0.008401783,0.050166193,0.009184281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043876484,0.0010397393,0.0015814196,0.00078339997,0.030712673,0.02121387,0.007938362,0.055205505,0.0023298163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017516979,0.000018936542,0.00012652729,0.00007612942,0.000007023132,0.0004978366,0.0071469615,0.00012146364,0.00024334663,0.5752149,0.40952235,0.00700694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020325953,0.000024384492,0.00041917784,0.00049666077,0.00001035346,0.00031260465,0.0035403182,0.00049917656,0.00048322754,0.07715041,0.91693234,0.00011089199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08849164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11164695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08849164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011653966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022435505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17595315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008860536","doi":"","title":"Court Review 54:2 (2018)- Editor's Note","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Economic Justice; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.027460187689383395,"score_gpt":0.30547825605496265,"score_spread":0.27801806836557924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008860536","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018076262,0.025383288,0.00020544008,0.551153,0.40341887,0.000074892974,0.00026653399,0.00013909138,0.019178089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029773822,0.015268846,0.00043270978,0.6008917,0.32713178,0.00012068176,0.00013725953,0.0001293465,0.05291032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581194,0.00081879226,0.00034552242,0.0005542553,0.0020158035,0.00045364298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98422205,0.0052526733,0.000623059,0.00060610566,0.008148712,0.0011475389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052038305,0.001609518,0.0019117902,0.0028677941,0.0056686793,0.009621881,0.004735589,0.021048019,0.02801722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027928337,0.0012382788,0.0020775571,0.0028754044,0.0029435921,0.0051750615,0.002347114,0.017965233,0.022342809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005555763,0.000008007169,0.00005680497,0.00006667911,0.00000486845,0.00004100098,0.000024082485,0.000014609649,0.000019214593,0.0012399381,0.9951565,0.0033627055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023760824,0.00000830975,0.0003767942,0.00047556285,0.0000151586955,0.000050613482,0.00006682898,0.00005430619,0.000030421901,0.0016183923,0.9972658,0.000014094265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027427545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08162702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02801722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007784933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098682195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09372693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011240406","doi":"","title":"Making Room for a Serial Killer Within Canada's Faint Hope Statute: Clifford Olson, Master Manipulator in the Criminal Justice System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Interrogation; Manipulator (device); Economic Justice; Control (management); Criticism; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.07261253742185192,"score_gpt":0.27289047925354776,"score_spread":0.20027794183169584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011240406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047258227,0.00521683,0.00044606894,0.95289844,0.0029905168,0.00004488861,0.00007947683,0.000035966892,0.033562005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17278288,0.01094283,0.0019487833,0.61181736,0.0035058416,0.000110086155,0.00011493836,0.00019300813,0.19858427],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186724,0.001445171,0.00023755789,0.000653326,0.0024218406,0.0033749249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865327,0.0045494675,0.00038732533,0.00020816669,0.003814799,0.0045075114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012499396,0.00078275334,0.0009829281,0.001886198,0.06189398,0.02105619,0.004293205,0.024815347,0.008535433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031569637,0.0009938552,0.000697022,0.0016982185,0.02024259,0.008533923,0.0065182983,0.038368236,0.0011075267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019969291,0.00003645841,0.0013520072,0.00003441012,0.000014631402,0.0002604955,0.00748585,0.0002783213,0.00009021477,0.101891726,0.87291867,0.015617177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052745494,0.000028218175,0.004226319,0.0007063498,0.00007060484,0.00011925986,0.050879307,0.0005314135,0.000343112,0.05324412,0.88962775,0.00017082925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95553017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06349971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06349971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3108195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46072483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011865983","doi":"","title":"Nasogaluak: Foregone Opportunities in an Unduly Restrained Sentencing Decision","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conscience; Charter; Misconduct; Power (physics); Guard (computer science); Nightmare","score_opus":0.07333201517934546,"score_gpt":0.34117207772953273,"score_spread":0.2678400625501873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011865983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20131718,0.0028384067,0.0063586636,0.3513545,0.0074050343,0.00033879915,0.00010669291,0.00040751815,0.42987308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76239,0.0010358446,0.005056781,0.103497416,0.00061086484,0.00029972882,0.000055474036,0.000089089655,0.12696478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874702,0.0039838883,0.0005786829,0.0008715893,0.0032566972,0.0038389268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99476033,0.0020328234,0.00024803382,0.0003993808,0.0010020665,0.0015573894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104786195,0.00043963437,0.00039084296,0.00087308814,0.029368587,0.009130571,0.0032803067,0.016656743,0.0056686904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024268227,0.00059677486,0.00050038355,0.0005503167,0.008479921,0.00390877,0.008804577,0.015010538,0.0013761787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020723413,0.0002609372,0.003276957,0.0001325891,0.00003583894,0.025352512,0.075343706,0.0010234364,0.0052568396,0.63338614,0.19237076,0.063352995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000637858,0.00015993841,0.004249104,0.0004799365,0.00006515475,0.0033373693,0.087280564,0.0021238935,0.002101548,0.082396686,0.81741714,0.0003248037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1351855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4105989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1351855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013682861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03749276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26879722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014856829","doi":"","title":"Prosecutions, Politics and the Public Interest: Some Recent Developments in the United Kingdom, Canada and Elsewhere","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.26293921352028327,"score_gpt":0.41039938156051503,"score_spread":0.14746016804023176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014856829","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1258705,0.41491637,0.00042006452,0.37484798,0.0020474743,0.00005698291,0.0019194164,0.000064333886,0.0798569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68130994,0.24056226,0.0010572061,0.042190075,0.0011881749,0.00004096204,0.00083060627,0.00009460556,0.032726247],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937348,0.0008853977,0.00039737255,0.0005322838,0.0020011715,0.0024490952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94516534,0.015368789,0.004882259,0.0007084231,0.021462535,0.012412669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007490734,0.0004196339,0.0010175888,0.007548266,0.01188945,0.023144094,0.0028034186,0.008223698,0.014523099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022474887,0.00065376604,0.00068995636,0.0253608,0.014403453,0.0066155805,0.004888019,0.006522725,0.0006944944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007958243,0.00041597325,0.099765226,0.005952025,0.00020489855,0.0020851633,0.06878538,0.0016328888,0.00075281376,0.21388635,0.20373331,0.40199018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049411563,0.000102095015,0.2983831,0.0044206893,0.00012015447,0.0004337108,0.08753416,0.00032935516,0.00029797124,0.004654354,0.6034175,0.00025752612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99580836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16063009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16063009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22124468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97355014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015156577","doi":"","title":"R. v. N.S.: What Is Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Opinion on the NIQAB in the Courtroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory interpretation; Public opinion; State supreme court; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.037983347569102814,"score_gpt":0.2953825797984283,"score_spread":0.2573992322293255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015156577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048971605,0.013030994,0.003762454,0.50849724,0.003623303,0.0002214004,0.0015801241,0.00017228727,0.4201405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5686773,0.0040704985,0.004345707,0.2945616,0.0009023689,0.00015951684,0.00043172398,0.0001110002,0.12674032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871192,0.0018440888,0.0006066114,0.0011239614,0.005040471,0.004265723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894918,0.0040683667,0.00037778853,0.00031903276,0.0039546383,0.0017883722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013382841,0.00060181355,0.0010802863,0.0014692597,0.022322785,0.011305506,0.003793693,0.019212268,0.005174629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03428814,0.00072085526,0.00078289467,0.0017482609,0.00924357,0.00395398,0.0026125782,0.016067293,0.0011125443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019863345,0.000058761474,0.0073792273,0.00014228343,0.000066813576,0.000749489,0.006055798,0.00043132025,0.00071694417,0.5790921,0.38069817,0.024410486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031617103,0.00011717645,0.02954335,0.0021410666,0.000491475,0.0005648643,0.015624593,0.0025880013,0.002760549,0.22994797,0.7154157,0.0004889939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93438596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98012733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065614045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04326394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14484867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31390333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015158212","doi":"","title":"R. v. Seruhungo: The Supreme Court of Canada 'Substantially' Affirms a Powerful Tool to Protect Against Wrongful Convictions Caused by Vetrovec Witnesses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Liability; Hearsay; Tort","score_opus":0.020558356179139304,"score_gpt":0.2806058922319038,"score_spread":0.2600475360527645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015158212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10421317,0.0054578483,0.0038903437,0.24668446,0.003915477,0.00040123757,0.0018963419,0.00048529892,0.6330558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5258966,0.0027089545,0.0032989122,0.20489034,0.0006411697,0.00011902706,0.00035490008,0.000120826204,0.2619693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952435,0.00023944053,0.00012630536,0.00040162198,0.00204099,0.0019480928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572974,0.0012547547,0.00018355745,0.0001772593,0.0018295321,0.00082520815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033142618,0.00047621573,0.0005370334,0.00097419514,0.018353451,0.006483811,0.0029062803,0.015556554,0.0072580897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011858948,0.0006679094,0.00085227063,0.001087949,0.0040435754,0.0013892442,0.0019580845,0.011254001,0.00110219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016750758,0.00008503667,0.014977562,0.00021341283,0.00012304385,0.0018221217,0.005128326,0.00060622115,0.0029363276,0.40636185,0.53506595,0.03251268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033649546,0.00013210381,0.04358765,0.0008209129,0.0006537673,0.0007014204,0.0070290575,0.0026940065,0.005916754,0.044877287,0.89288545,0.00036499076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9673921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99147344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032607913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01999249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11655434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1450563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016238269","doi":"","title":"Workshop on Criminalization (September 2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Criminal code; Deportation; Common law","score_opus":0.07180738783820485,"score_gpt":0.3747301917893052,"score_spread":0.3029228039511004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016238269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012924592,0.023784822,0.003967261,0.21686453,0.1454116,0.0009723308,0.005078156,0.00049677974,0.5904999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034795117,0.008387788,0.0022402476,0.015545819,0.009294237,0.0005758224,0.0034225371,0.0002350404,0.9255034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983652,0.00041783624,0.000075133634,0.00026998846,0.0003442755,0.000527525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973928,0.00026625814,0.00013227754,0.00015815055,0.00075316476,0.0012971961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030521078,0.0009271857,0.00043243833,0.0011015744,0.004021758,0.0041688704,0.0016114342,0.0040261536,0.12973674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036554497,0.00044036738,0.00076454406,0.0006944239,0.0010129166,0.0022689656,0.0063129226,0.0045151156,0.03813083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006694357,0.00006455194,0.00029797945,0.000079354824,0.000003659405,0.00013651526,0.0005524509,0.00005787944,0.00025419734,0.0033954855,0.96191305,0.03317785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007613224,0.000017659715,0.0012637896,0.00019852955,0.0000017401294,0.00005596671,0.0007972389,0.00003056518,0.00016556916,0.0010080105,0.99644715,0.000006120222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010104166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03378148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12973674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003623362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005914082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4340126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018240532","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Stopping ofMotor Vehicles in Canada andthe United States:A Comparative Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Power (physics); Proposition; Supreme Court Decisions; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.05660643949922553,"score_gpt":0.269740567376073,"score_spread":0.21313412787684746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018240532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4760211,0.023692427,0.0005364248,0.02294492,0.0003000401,0.00010083046,0.0011411507,0.000015110938,0.47524804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815051,0.007084184,0.00023665222,0.0033359425,0.000045732406,0.000030651794,0.0003300601,0.000011680579,0.007419988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961127,0.0010569711,0.00020548853,0.00054565375,0.0041926275,0.00438789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99156976,0.0019043174,0.000662672,0.00020660703,0.0047601406,0.00089649175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036885238,0.00035860206,0.00078778155,0.005996136,0.018187338,0.01027925,0.0022908626,0.0030433785,0.006274952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013821371,0.00038280504,0.000625333,0.011595443,0.011306401,0.0028305477,0.0032066368,0.0041672057,0.0002159202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034639635,0.00019171876,0.07807812,0.0004942415,0.00034289414,0.001533073,0.04228978,0.002732916,0.0005512832,0.77850205,0.037576336,0.057361186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016723605,0.00022443778,0.380403,0.0020996705,0.000867139,0.00052345835,0.20115949,0.0019589998,0.001114222,0.02368329,0.38747165,0.00032742292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16127174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16127174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12955208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018932218","doi":"","title":"The effective participation of suspects in police custody","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Criminal justice; Interrogation; Law enforcement; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03739101275247101,"score_gpt":0.38047022107882517,"score_spread":0.34307920832635413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018932218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34014872,0.0030147114,0.010199809,0.12247689,0.00060284714,0.00027813748,0.00011870119,0.0000576657,0.5231026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98068446,0.00051921525,0.0011214542,0.0038573379,0.00014001911,0.000086361055,0.000027838967,0.000006993861,0.013556262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803705,0.012123057,0.0007403757,0.0011178977,0.002544567,0.0031035068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98545873,0.008323074,0.0022160609,0.0010842365,0.0013139866,0.0016039297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01509052,0.00033445167,0.00039109198,0.0018359246,0.008658868,0.0060689505,0.0018188269,0.007847468,0.0058295634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033121724,0.00038293385,0.0005630919,0.0006280943,0.017856186,0.0059304787,0.008967595,0.004630373,0.0008882284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016722329,0.00025718048,0.041373476,0.00031162065,0.000042203763,0.008184984,0.22068754,0.000310843,0.0017438227,0.5569549,0.028932257,0.14103392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006198252,0.0008928017,0.06221671,0.0026643127,0.0001278353,0.014252369,0.30877638,0.0008134907,0.002832195,0.31554076,0.2916558,0.00016530296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057951864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013405539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01509052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014132599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004722948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07980728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020550757","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v Chapman&lt;/i&gt;: Can You Believe Without Believing?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Work (physics); Order (exchange); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.028828856561482714,"score_gpt":0.2829789498087328,"score_spread":0.2541500932472501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020550757","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011669684,0.003296893,0.0015524322,0.66837364,0.002628101,0.00007540936,0.00051875046,0.0001484337,0.31173667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2615583,0.0018646363,0.0014192929,0.5729267,0.0008676973,0.00013934117,0.00015620005,0.00009203418,0.16097584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969222,0.0006948419,0.00014423797,0.00028566993,0.00090514525,0.0010479052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553657,0.0019388845,0.00032468358,0.0002818074,0.0012698586,0.0006481669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003905493,0.00046079978,0.00040278287,0.00077293103,0.008554876,0.0066745942,0.0017622563,0.018906845,0.0208286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016692333,0.000572201,0.0006877423,0.0005667171,0.0077219857,0.0037747729,0.0021716973,0.014400909,0.007794393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074322365,0.000023227225,0.0025699225,0.000064118714,0.000016046182,0.00092524436,0.0022628272,0.0000662547,0.00056038983,0.31317115,0.66829664,0.011969819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011741486,0.00008126158,0.011363121,0.00096839,0.000105946485,0.0011039234,0.010333243,0.0008437685,0.0031977221,0.18114425,0.7905071,0.000233886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30814105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46216178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30814105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010696089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015030941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.612695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020775949","doi":"","title":"Ministerial Misfeasance: R. v. Morris and a Unique\\nEarly Privacy Breach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Statute; Information privacy; Nova scotia; Perspective (graphical); Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Data Protection Act 1998; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.03062384374743567,"score_gpt":0.31417314842757854,"score_spread":0.2835493046801429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020775949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14062361,0.025896747,0.0010713784,0.6014975,0.0022559648,0.000049877723,0.00018060165,0.00013704182,0.22828723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81198317,0.0063206796,0.0006523521,0.124112114,0.0004770965,0.00002212981,0.000025628737,0.000038350277,0.05636841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976585,0.00050109776,0.0000619029,0.0003737788,0.00061255007,0.000792209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985366,0.00058475893,0.0001595051,0.00011143165,0.00024037261,0.00036740638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018512522,0.00030523512,0.0002821478,0.00054628117,0.014128728,0.0047408305,0.0013970886,0.007488728,0.0018628804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006993887,0.00041778747,0.000267313,0.00055478705,0.012326303,0.0018801561,0.0029006521,0.009372093,0.00028656135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052495838,0.000040166815,0.0067125787,0.0001125338,0.000021589165,0.006326273,0.08807623,0.00019921646,0.0009231076,0.6306474,0.24705422,0.01983431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003598802,0.00006694375,0.02062809,0.0008522484,0.00006309911,0.00620945,0.05066471,0.0005184799,0.001467586,0.055334736,0.8639965,0.00016199514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69028914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8069877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69028914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014000145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018351113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62306964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024689898","doi":"","title":"Sporenonderzoek op de plaats delict","year":2024,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Gulag; Legal history","score_opus":0.23404696054428195,"score_gpt":0.4660813253211008,"score_spread":0.23203436477681885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024689898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01642246,0.026457066,0.0042024236,0.33067164,0.013537168,0.0001391104,0.0014538543,0.0003855877,0.6067307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11324658,0.015988914,0.0018739952,0.039122462,0.0029116024,0.0001424332,0.0011045502,0.0004991746,0.8251103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647695,0.0007735162,0.0001711718,0.00052713696,0.0012253572,0.00082587154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958949,0.0011221535,0.00025572194,0.00034640377,0.0012357788,0.0011450555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026230933,0.00057854597,0.0005288621,0.0012341882,0.0063884626,0.009099274,0.0017844824,0.0042742332,0.16559187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010045368,0.0005269716,0.00057213986,0.0011589665,0.0043293,0.0065343506,0.0078378245,0.0075155017,0.030734707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006276472,0.000059114183,0.0019479054,0.0003134772,0.000014718458,0.0015561366,0.00961679,0.00013332834,0.00041957851,0.22650316,0.6710511,0.08832195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004297444,0.000008688098,0.0006987075,0.00021948945,0.000004619216,0.0003493221,0.0038245248,0.000030782423,0.00012195207,0.0077668307,0.9869617,0.0000090686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03247693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041080378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16559187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007921878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013754437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55395997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028040080","doi":"","title":"Discussion Following the Remarks of Mr. Power and Mr. Cole","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Immigration; Deportation; Phone; Power (physics); Residence","score_opus":0.013406147857826674,"score_gpt":0.2751604205440951,"score_spread":0.26175427268626844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028040080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024719903,0.0030659589,0.00036462184,0.8371074,0.14160079,0.00008867709,0.00013033791,0.00018837697,0.017206715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026359048,0.002029592,0.000512674,0.6901973,0.042885665,0.00013407474,0.00012649591,0.00019556862,0.26128274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966761,0.0006765794,0.00015160232,0.00050374,0.0014170397,0.0005748898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877407,0.0015841315,0.00045321984,0.00045952096,0.0056692394,0.0040932586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039093774,0.001149404,0.00088114257,0.0007696959,0.0069502397,0.005346346,0.0028042693,0.014531768,0.10218784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029727815,0.0005388188,0.0012513238,0.00047037652,0.0020660618,0.0054696635,0.003475551,0.02556832,0.06904052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005891877,0.000005979441,0.000030900865,0.000012064263,9.337457e-7,0.00006409961,0.00007169642,0.000004403273,0.000036297683,0.00032252946,0.99680567,0.002639562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033307388,0.000007548252,0.000105931096,0.00005372265,0.0000017051576,0.00010437964,0.0005141147,0.000012528333,0.0000463059,0.00035821914,0.99878556,0.0000066638827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010695216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020219864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10218784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040909904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006556216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34185237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029568555","doi":"","title":"Joseph Fabics v. City of New Brunswick","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.1533844669108018,"score_gpt":0.3748256413343371,"score_spread":0.2214411744235353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029568555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021112528,0.012434754,0.00086015766,0.15092954,0.0032951394,0.00030434874,0.0022515722,0.00016595752,0.8086459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10350046,0.006306889,0.0010638629,0.0921943,0.00039415862,0.00020010554,0.00083738286,0.000086423584,0.79541636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976998,0.00017346327,0.000073925694,0.00023009203,0.00076060364,0.0010621172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723,0.0010539468,0.000119157274,0.00014971192,0.0009554449,0.0004918227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018968524,0.0007021423,0.0005019799,0.0018200001,0.012398559,0.0051909415,0.001733358,0.0068731327,0.032254975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006595693,0.0009799144,0.0005342636,0.0018474709,0.0019592189,0.0017827469,0.0021096605,0.009839476,0.0038226873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017515426,0.00005092571,0.00815651,0.00021093391,0.00004384063,0.0013575206,0.0016863066,0.0002829279,0.0015463782,0.15093681,0.8001616,0.035390988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007363439,0.000026716596,0.011803,0.00041672908,0.000058499674,0.00022441328,0.0016445018,0.00021935506,0.0015589896,0.0075696846,0.9763081,0.000096414806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78749925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95570403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78749925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020861782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050519705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42750436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029627650","doi":"","title":"La protection des secrets industriels appartenant à des tiers sous le régime fédéral de la Loi sur l'accès à l'information","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Identification (biology); Unfair competition; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.018329759697837098,"score_gpt":0.22063400578070613,"score_spread":0.20230424608286904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029627650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3066205,0.010776524,0.009768604,0.04238898,0.00041875796,0.00013917187,0.00080846256,0.00012225035,0.6289568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728225,0.0031168102,0.0027682965,0.0032854574,0.00012831528,0.00007329224,0.00018518047,0.00002761941,0.11759254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926345,0.001563653,0.00033112653,0.00091189676,0.0026562433,0.0019025527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98968,0.005200406,0.0014346195,0.00131626,0.001859642,0.0005091496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049758865,0.00035578338,0.00043723357,0.002808513,0.010327822,0.009967253,0.0012667194,0.0042963866,0.011054308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012464465,0.00038824612,0.00056667416,0.003076304,0.00952693,0.003935119,0.0033844218,0.003626853,0.0011007431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055077417,0.000041797877,0.00899299,0.00017665242,0.000022015287,0.00038006753,0.018707294,0.00033397204,0.0015873252,0.9186424,0.009375576,0.041684728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003782149,0.00016550686,0.11131698,0.0013841462,0.00012518399,0.0008562335,0.020208083,0.0012393759,0.006911655,0.089037575,0.7685395,0.00017794147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3183944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41385388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6816056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01687596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020464143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029749839","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v Griffith&lt;/i&gt;","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Charter; Legislation; Hearsay; Subpoena; Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.025538441889498168,"score_gpt":0.2889928778528873,"score_spread":0.26345443596338913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029749839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00930207,0.0032767062,0.0017098937,0.16298018,0.0062808567,0.0005605882,0.00286247,0.0006687553,0.8123585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04822428,0.0007412263,0.0016351345,0.32505307,0.0008476008,0.0003561583,0.00044187807,0.00020563373,0.622495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940148,0.0005983041,0.00028709514,0.00078210136,0.0022714252,0.0020462975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953244,0.0016150522,0.00016548419,0.000285683,0.0020801064,0.00052930176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005330491,0.0007502375,0.0005500651,0.0009912745,0.011633081,0.007885722,0.0023357847,0.025870517,0.031970926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012490481,0.0011046465,0.0012825851,0.0008127232,0.0039804983,0.0023970478,0.0023807634,0.015628127,0.01617377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006566635,0.000034941542,0.0009893795,0.00011083843,0.000010566079,0.00038182738,0.000994253,0.00013028573,0.00086030416,0.13080136,0.8569319,0.008688652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033339034,0.000053211745,0.0033580207,0.00025287416,0.000033278044,0.00013552791,0.0009735292,0.00030134752,0.0011072584,0.009804141,0.9838667,0.00008081335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5480173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6969542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5480173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009774613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025677294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029899080","doi":"","title":"Legal outlier, again? U.S. felon suffrage: comparative and international human rights perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Jurisprudence; Treaty; Proportionality (law); International human rights law; Suffrage; Criminal law; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.07062672387551965,"score_gpt":0.3062630479449132,"score_spread":0.23563632406939355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029899080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013734939,0.05820736,0.0007916223,0.13614206,0.0010897426,0.000012341397,0.00007472522,0.000024210845,0.78992295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8401267,0.070403606,0.0014828097,0.05037374,0.0032705748,0.000105028645,0.00020116182,0.00008903223,0.033947486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538547,0.0024090344,0.000111117304,0.00048957235,0.0005673549,0.0010375195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577004,0.0026349078,0.00038574782,0.00023841622,0.0005616828,0.00040909654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005785428,0.00062063406,0.0006042767,0.006119512,0.009955379,0.019051403,0.0017200165,0.008726707,0.010536058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005274422,0.0002447818,0.0006018308,0.005954859,0.024613122,0.013440579,0.0043849153,0.008731453,0.0007381404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006172237,0.000015930917,0.0002432166,0.000056042176,0.0000030992924,0.000083102685,0.0044430955,0.00004421285,0.00003330074,0.9811091,0.0070806267,0.0068820673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126131745,0.000083136365,0.003622296,0.0026649777,0.000038884453,0.0004619557,0.045845017,0.00029691975,0.00033274232,0.28731182,0.6592906,0.00003902942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029974919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038683895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029974919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0148698855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005965566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107889056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030515106","doi":"","title":"In a Nutshell: Correcting the Record About Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Medical record; Government (linguistics); Legislation; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.028946420192286413,"score_gpt":0.3180327778697666,"score_spread":0.28908635767748014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030515106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092590717,0.0032748105,0.0010161104,0.96583164,0.018672116,0.000007977948,0.00013056412,0.000041232037,0.010099728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023862334,0.0040995176,0.0020639251,0.9447682,0.0112345265,0.000024212055,0.00014050928,0.0001285822,0.013678111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775679,0.0059054904,0.0025606307,0.0021484615,0.009380284,0.0024372279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9022624,0.06360929,0.0048793727,0.0041321577,0.021452958,0.0036637145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020696089,0.00074056594,0.00096073997,0.001976137,0.012635403,0.014364124,0.004604949,0.027137855,0.003623904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1334522,0.00073581754,0.0010175854,0.0022004722,0.017500756,0.011644013,0.0038353645,0.0507241,0.0018175503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023117735,0.000008302368,0.0007294263,0.000109193,0.00002377744,0.00016361606,0.0031490966,0.00008209427,0.000083865256,0.08303339,0.901111,0.011483123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019216144,0.000021233407,0.0015028673,0.0013150902,0.000048911294,0.00030715324,0.00476147,0.00024782182,0.0004910397,0.021528162,0.969637,0.00011998014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33042955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47708097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33042955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010624145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029130122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65701246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038269912","doi":"","title":"Graduate Students in the Canadian Historical Association","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.054293210490205676,"score_gpt":0.28396477739740045,"score_spread":0.22967156690719476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038269912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043995395,0.0100274505,0.00038014675,0.04978166,0.006145637,0.00039239533,0.011630311,0.0003015114,0.87734544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07125406,0.004747117,0.00050663395,0.005287951,0.0005735401,0.000113196336,0.0032344116,0.000106189655,0.9141769],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948344,0.00023539699,0.00009514817,0.0003512255,0.0018390075,0.0026447875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752606,0.00021926902,0.00021558278,0.00026063586,0.0035882986,0.00819024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030271658,0.00067621627,0.00069147826,0.0076925233,0.028153077,0.0078075915,0.0025974126,0.0026286405,0.15129212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007330238,0.00059986225,0.0005551687,0.010690202,0.0027367221,0.002231182,0.0052840724,0.0030095004,0.022551663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032256765,0.000079873265,0.01685106,0.00011558908,0.000006065689,0.00025652754,0.009200199,0.000036128342,0.00014564653,0.023765884,0.86344016,0.08607062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026434557,0.000006051628,0.017515479,0.00008777372,0.000002873401,0.000045696535,0.006325933,0.000023860994,0.000027502996,0.00046469018,0.97548646,0.0000110390165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95451325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95451325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048156623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17572969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5061226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039379751","doi":"","title":"La saisie de données situées dans le nuage en droit criminel canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Développement du Porc du Québec; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Legislation","score_opus":0.018902962460254844,"score_gpt":0.2663863277277084,"score_spread":0.24748336526745357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039379751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25498372,0.014672632,0.023775905,0.046243858,0.0012767847,0.0006651346,0.007049916,0.00088704855,0.65044504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66953593,0.010739357,0.019195072,0.0030865674,0.00016011212,0.0003560114,0.00353622,0.0005632653,0.29282743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98955065,0.0026966257,0.00075432094,0.0013105358,0.0041240295,0.0015637624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98018336,0.0084898,0.0013514329,0.001915854,0.0068725124,0.001187069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079869935,0.00067514146,0.0006026036,0.008977152,0.020989845,0.014233113,0.001990906,0.0027466777,0.024279164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022358704,0.00075763365,0.000497249,0.017624348,0.013630096,0.008679083,0.0073227994,0.0029051516,0.0032531843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013359175,0.00003492078,0.017714988,0.0007629255,0.00004031,0.0035928993,0.64907676,0.0005227869,0.002491935,0.18273595,0.033880893,0.109012105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042207403,0.000016506172,0.013326197,0.0007190075,0.000023547867,0.0007139655,0.15308489,0.00021025547,0.00085391663,0.005066681,0.82588196,0.00009892055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71923816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7779124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28076184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03649099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046045713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56483054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039504632","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v Ibrahim&lt;/i&gt;","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Categorical variable; Depiction; State (computer science); Connection (principal bundle); Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.02572681383876039,"score_gpt":0.28933730455280277,"score_spread":0.26361049071404236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039504632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008811636,0.0040957727,0.00097009836,0.3406057,0.005148357,0.00012007927,0.0009265226,0.0003824385,0.63893926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060461454,0.0011932175,0.0010297651,0.5470459,0.0012447926,0.00018122172,0.00021963147,0.00017455452,0.3884495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997498,0.0002797394,0.00010109437,0.0004331105,0.0007271086,0.0009609851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982066,0.0008060597,0.0001279978,0.0001080981,0.0005533359,0.00019780723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002548212,0.0005705876,0.00043354035,0.0005975748,0.008678126,0.005136038,0.0027694413,0.021169364,0.023345709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063912272,0.00069065404,0.0008241082,0.0005579652,0.0026465154,0.0020536615,0.0020266774,0.014982371,0.013001263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004282769,0.000026446138,0.0010129637,0.00008432762,0.000007657499,0.00057935336,0.001961872,0.00006383894,0.0007337184,0.11504971,0.8721483,0.008288983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002011219,0.000028313221,0.0029476057,0.00019664258,0.000024747098,0.00022569126,0.0013026033,0.00015139238,0.0010182126,0.0049726027,0.98906225,0.000049801507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19859713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32460627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19859713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006040318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076210294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39488232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7040986749","doi":"","title":"USA v. Mosley","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Legislation; Culpability; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.031708603439576856,"score_gpt":0.33268072267955096,"score_spread":0.3009721192399741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7040986749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073627466,0.0036937925,0.00053431577,0.039796084,0.003024261,0.00010624824,0.0014602984,0.00014557078,0.9438766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06151806,0.0029663143,0.0006252876,0.12833166,0.0010583651,0.00029084316,0.0006069605,0.00008891982,0.8045137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883896,0.00012500054,0.000050933922,0.00019733243,0.00042065515,0.00036711933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904186,0.00037746754,0.00007082232,0.00008676696,0.0002986763,0.00012430454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011680123,0.0005382772,0.00043531856,0.0012251537,0.0060139736,0.00397107,0.0012067293,0.0073507484,0.062888294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049307295,0.00051528926,0.00060560915,0.0009951575,0.0010860483,0.0019743107,0.0022085852,0.0076853563,0.012213009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007558275,0.00004080484,0.0017890531,0.00012293554,0.000025183814,0.0011638266,0.00045420157,0.00017464766,0.0006966939,0.28469574,0.67457765,0.036183655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000231584,0.000021812393,0.0019566466,0.00015115929,0.000020046244,0.00019231929,0.00014584015,0.00010323839,0.00030089403,0.0077949543,0.98927003,0.00001977934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08543714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20749591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08543714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004015275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007661969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21038228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042949477","doi":"","title":"3rd Qtr Crime Report from ep. 314 of City Hall This Week","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Commission; Police department; Crime analysis; Royal Commission","score_opus":0.016502528809721077,"score_gpt":0.23610836077341946,"score_spread":0.21960583196369837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042949477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017622169,0.0015214117,0.00041980785,0.0065860795,0.005308071,0.00049319805,0.07008046,0.0016621982,0.9121666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001349476,0.00054635806,0.00010906255,0.0005967427,0.0002095866,0.00007326989,0.006886136,0.00026878953,0.98996055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991541,0.000048408903,0.000036643727,0.000073086696,0.00056122284,0.00012644903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850225,0.00010601079,0.00007179996,0.00011527199,0.0009509051,0.00025371803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060165295,0.0008818737,0.0005963871,0.0019600873,0.0026785745,0.0027376555,0.0011915705,0.0018518366,0.59997845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032330574,0.00057928835,0.000629004,0.0016241743,0.0002939129,0.0013620815,0.0019774109,0.0021033739,0.43114242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010157736,0.00000776589,0.00012751797,0.000022048926,9.434759e-7,0.000013587875,0.000014798954,0.0000071008594,0.000026018564,0.00013133704,0.9928375,0.0068012765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012020952,0.00003148473,0.006574384,0.00013948532,0.00000448029,0.00003371002,0.00015089814,0.00005016073,0.00014772979,0.00022724352,0.9926173,0.000011105906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07479612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20558189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59997845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018698215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003265855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57058215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043997636","doi":"","title":"Wrongfully Convicted Guilty Pleas, Imagined Crimes, and What Canada Must Do to Safeguard Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.031901552444164746,"score_gpt":0.32908927157367646,"score_spread":0.2971877191295117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043997636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21532594,0.015752958,0.0014158919,0.5647792,0.0012226243,0.00009390082,0.0014827189,0.00004959029,0.19987719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496012,0.00611729,0.0011625056,0.030611062,0.00022267718,0.00003254679,0.00025760228,0.00003716631,0.011957938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876903,0.0021519691,0.00060282706,0.0009357931,0.0049285917,0.0036904856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94459105,0.01600465,0.0046445467,0.0020901936,0.025654797,0.007014678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011847839,0.00033665996,0.0007192471,0.0025803738,0.014217579,0.012145184,0.004104864,0.008802455,0.009885786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103909105,0.0005994073,0.00055692776,0.0022738338,0.015616071,0.007817527,0.003558892,0.013911469,0.00068417983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036620165,0.0003747316,0.17840289,0.00064335146,0.0002655706,0.0012906713,0.025003603,0.0011136436,0.00036451782,0.48198918,0.17502119,0.13516451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022818864,0.0001728982,0.33007175,0.0063925167,0.0008810688,0.0009926767,0.092549615,0.0030711773,0.0019486604,0.27459267,0.28839347,0.0007052039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9640805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05582594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05582594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17276838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40504748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046054625","doi":"","title":"Civil liability and the police use of force in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Harvard University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Demotion; Triacetin; Hemopericardium","score_opus":0.008630488093284877,"score_gpt":0.20810972083909568,"score_spread":0.1994792327458108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046054625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6922761,0.0201442,0.0007296668,0.077008575,0.00054502016,0.00016593824,0.002129514,0.000045228742,0.20695575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784959,0.0075127548,0.00032028425,0.002931415,0.000054953474,0.00001975303,0.00036370402,0.000016416117,0.010284761],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941843,0.00040142535,0.0002287774,0.000279745,0.0026406946,0.0022651297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801996,0.0028125558,0.0025592986,0.0002971536,0.008826966,0.005304348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019583772,0.0002176581,0.00052472315,0.0047490117,0.015371192,0.005782214,0.002298368,0.0022609571,0.007303784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0238934,0.000527105,0.00056929927,0.007881213,0.0044076582,0.0014607453,0.0031283367,0.005179912,0.00032117433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002901923,0.00043029553,0.5226447,0.00043657763,0.00019452188,0.003692896,0.028190099,0.0035557952,0.00038240064,0.25536668,0.08734604,0.09746982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013043032,0.00009615164,0.80701476,0.0015124866,0.00025568187,0.0013932139,0.029405,0.0044848835,0.00041147557,0.01935222,0.13567796,0.00026565415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16490942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16490942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2546792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067837433","doi":"","title":"Non-Disclosure of Relevant Material and Chapter III: The Tantalising Promise of Due Process Rights Protection by the Australian Constitution in the Gageler High Court Using Separation of Powers Principles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"High Court; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Process (computing); Separation of powers; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07245225550536545,"score_gpt":0.3427873845343191,"score_spread":0.2703351290289537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067837433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10377486,0.0056971465,0.047854967,0.07873962,0.0015031304,0.0005743771,0.00018660478,0.00017854174,0.7614906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8352624,0.002318512,0.014631196,0.019291092,0.0006317623,0.00039054823,0.00009831363,0.000077761135,0.12729844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97971994,0.006487176,0.001357068,0.0018783585,0.008386695,0.0021706999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761836,0.016825767,0.0014331263,0.0032606157,0.001764725,0.0005321438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018259145,0.00033903355,0.0008881535,0.0010458127,0.004653577,0.0138566615,0.0022352578,0.0116029605,0.0062360265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03707763,0.00095225207,0.0008756004,0.0008219242,0.017822208,0.0064667887,0.007852237,0.011360884,0.0012549703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015926355,0.000018245972,0.00036138485,0.000090667556,0.000008863743,0.0003307497,0.00480176,0.00019299738,0.00085770397,0.9776903,0.0033223426,0.012308911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059270777,0.00022087095,0.004915919,0.0017126715,0.00008651642,0.00092857564,0.0029999684,0.0021388985,0.0062338435,0.6915152,0.2890432,0.00014515132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013166757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017486373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018259145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004762915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013708987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09656477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070652118","doi":"","title":"The principle of the free evaluation of evidence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific periodicals of Ukraine","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conviction; Element (criminal law); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Enforcement","score_opus":0.2030428212577023,"score_gpt":0.46066831068426145,"score_spread":0.25762548942655916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070652118","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008168156,0.013110138,0.6580817,0.049750667,0.002988339,0.0013035913,0.001078626,0.00032333794,0.26519555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41638133,0.00866036,0.509163,0.023956122,0.0064686523,0.004811082,0.00049616554,0.0003221131,0.029741202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8931444,0.038064353,0.011804885,0.014647691,0.039284896,0.0030537695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90793866,0.05965019,0.0044172313,0.012105327,0.014554279,0.0013341613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07478186,0.0013389545,0.004051801,0.0072554066,0.0045243194,0.014798826,0.0043694773,0.012040522,0.003969113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09883785,0.0016862506,0.003865131,0.002595675,0.05543358,0.011609509,0.009654442,0.011791959,0.0034329337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016449241,0.0000109745615,0.0001447886,0.0001868185,0.0000480366,0.00008943617,0.00033075755,0.0004215166,0.00019240752,0.98892385,0.001979572,0.00765533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034531873,0.000035029905,0.00020466592,0.0003568671,0.00003870146,0.0002704934,0.00006333861,0.0006840579,0.00042407136,0.97088695,0.02695284,0.000048370275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024932397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013197673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07478186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061045852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012599042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39548898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094497017","doi":"","title":"The Filing of Additional Reasonsin Canada","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Supreme court; Conviction; Paragraph; Criminal code; Sentence","score_opus":0.024038247147693297,"score_gpt":0.20524812343802895,"score_spread":0.18120987629033566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094497017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043956485,0.0016908097,0.006389318,0.025437152,0.004740345,0.0023226032,0.010808263,0.0012038893,0.90345114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17873424,0.0015976451,0.011044744,0.0128416335,0.00052009406,0.00050724193,0.0059849536,0.00030974555,0.7884597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813664,0.0009667105,0.0009959149,0.001233853,0.009804561,0.0056326105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96200305,0.0035343666,0.0008896262,0.0031377096,0.026892133,0.003543168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007357585,0.0007303328,0.0008434055,0.0043203495,0.022726255,0.0069448343,0.0026842235,0.004815764,0.056280296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027882526,0.0010629856,0.0013053033,0.0033702094,0.0020093627,0.0015464717,0.0051094517,0.0062319944,0.011496791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019775516,0.00017948619,0.009714556,0.0002939619,0.000042495678,0.0019142344,0.004041722,0.00041020513,0.0024950316,0.14515121,0.7281712,0.10738812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004641058,0.000068590125,0.020389792,0.00027024426,0.000047309513,0.00029281157,0.0017255829,0.00075562374,0.002232031,0.0032041522,0.9708081,0.00015937146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91172457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9699608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08827543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041035846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17344612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2977373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097452286","doi":"","title":"Firearms – Mandatory Minimum Sentences – Consecutive Sentences – Notice of Greater Penalty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Criminal code; Public policy; Paragraph; Legislation; Criminal law","score_opus":0.0639084087610424,"score_gpt":0.3455534127800999,"score_spread":0.28164500401905745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097452286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026527686,0.0007660752,0.007600574,0.059044484,0.008678,0.003149625,0.0067493683,0.0038684339,0.8836157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2133275,0.00091583,0.012660289,0.16393109,0.006147229,0.0035522375,0.0050732275,0.0008891517,0.59350353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98982006,0.001477605,0.0010306549,0.0010355625,0.0047742273,0.0018618822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852642,0.0046224436,0.0015775639,0.0018848494,0.0049841856,0.0016668617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005619304,0.00047756406,0.0004886236,0.0012195476,0.0031415394,0.0030974655,0.0027216116,0.012673031,0.09106293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027229313,0.0008026157,0.00076931895,0.00072738394,0.0010630727,0.0025652007,0.0024044286,0.005457931,0.0578596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027526196,0.00057566375,0.0025023322,0.00026018886,0.000014286033,0.0007141062,0.0006307374,0.00039385856,0.003916306,0.040878497,0.8910901,0.05874864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023587218,0.00042671157,0.021209454,0.00041574615,0.000018839824,0.00074402895,0.0003828923,0.0010244609,0.002302752,0.009414493,0.963694,0.00013066597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016947025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026581157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09106293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002289358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008641817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30463588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097708844","doi":"","title":"SUBJECT: Appeals by Crown to the Court of Appeal and Supreme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Acquittal; Supreme court; Law of the case; Argument (complex analysis); Jury; Remand (court procedure); Trial court","score_opus":0.060835135841402356,"score_gpt":0.338374096094975,"score_spread":0.2775389602535726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097708844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004821785,0.0008398946,0.00084871054,0.027659582,0.0020358313,0.0029050158,0.005452468,0.0011992084,0.95423746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019899366,0.00055764045,0.0008045469,0.025902316,0.001327648,0.00097463967,0.00145574,0.0003779177,0.94870025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861427,0.0006056684,0.000691989,0.0013721945,0.0058001415,0.0053873425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97819877,0.0036419483,0.00047874785,0.0019378596,0.013450014,0.0022926717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004990981,0.0015218222,0.0025009045,0.004035823,0.019703621,0.01812517,0.0066133314,0.036815327,0.19807129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036277458,0.0023933493,0.0018268706,0.0032479388,0.003783444,0.0030797543,0.0038869993,0.013103791,0.14427571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110217574,0.00017804992,0.0011084281,0.00012969514,0.000025905627,0.0008805402,0.00045962963,0.00026735393,0.0009332393,0.043685786,0.9331824,0.01903866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010955127,0.00004511162,0.004278972,0.00029660817,0.000044647662,0.00015030368,0.00042852992,0.00060712366,0.0004698009,0.003788391,0.98969835,0.000082659026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73207134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8480271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73207134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04248906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12863806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66261446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097885465","doi":"","title":"and","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminal offence; Work (physics); Restitution; Legislation; Criminal investigation","score_opus":0.09603738423026005,"score_gpt":0.34592789001591695,"score_spread":0.2498905057856569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097885465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015008801,0.0023792426,0.0021581552,0.048300974,0.009728566,0.00014599765,0.0013537215,0.00031913858,0.9341134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009867598,0.0011471673,0.0011271515,0.014548277,0.00072778744,0.00007697021,0.00066694233,0.00014612412,0.97169197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820864,0.00023561627,0.00006877277,0.00055149157,0.0005987338,0.00033669348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983746,0.00017860587,0.00008166317,0.00018217493,0.0009084769,0.00027450887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013877895,0.0007078595,0.0003999286,0.0008144536,0.004224589,0.0049924115,0.000998481,0.0027404935,0.4102627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050485437,0.0002566472,0.00054769276,0.00065899506,0.0013819891,0.0045696283,0.0022153922,0.003321408,0.21668704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040895095,0.000024756913,0.0007301532,0.000059984024,0.0000052989985,0.00008527628,0.0004794308,0.0000471378,0.0001739213,0.09441732,0.8649357,0.03900011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040480822,0.0000059130225,0.0003536703,0.000032911696,0.0000014636679,0.00006216621,0.00023192154,0.00002209153,0.00006819833,0.0036587603,0.99555403,0.0000048197167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016541405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024421202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5897373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024605552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029792748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098349229","doi":"","title":"Estimation of a High-Accuracy Marine Geoid Offshore Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geoid; Altimeter; Undulation of the geoid; Bathymetry; Geodetic datum; Ocean surface topography; Submarine pipeline; Gravitational field; Sea-surface height","score_opus":0.05607599913959358,"score_gpt":0.3460735052191679,"score_spread":0.2899975060795743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098349229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9303137,0.00020228075,0.056727972,0.00027372708,0.000056558794,0.000043168307,0.003685697,0.0003220291,0.008374834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797665,0.00007329913,0.017761795,0.000024090872,0.0000053988224,0.000010906358,0.0011631247,0.0000135292685,0.0011813522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998503,0.000022544682,0.000010456112,0.000042665597,0.000046732202,0.000027330001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999498,0.00005768552,0.00010476455,0.00009700963,0.00021718362,0.00002535174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031018822,0.00023402825,0.00017148796,0.00083131273,0.00030473675,0.0006819866,0.0003365733,0.00021161501,0.00065576914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013496946,0.00014821025,0.00019547237,0.00077129545,0.00020913698,0.000499343,0.0005827192,0.00035496047,0.00023669485],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103597115,0.00005396869,0.5716765,0.00010762712,0.00017016316,0.00051584805,0.0004129493,0.213393,0.023576448,0.002088137,0.0033983644,0.18450333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016900813,0.00004523228,0.67333347,0.000048772683,0.00004356115,0.00008941024,0.0005785446,0.30950835,0.008562878,0.0004337155,0.0073046195,0.000034598273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40903732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5949743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59096265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013835402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014517324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8133129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100378162","doi":"","title":"ARTICLE Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Guidelines for Treating Mild Diabetic Foot Infections: A Decision-Tree Model for Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formulary; Christian ministry; Foot (prosody); Health care; Amputation; Medical prescription; Diabetes mellitus; Health economics; Diabetic foot","score_opus":0.11319300397528886,"score_gpt":0.4126541490281165,"score_spread":0.2994611450528276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100378162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8046054,0.004556046,0.110707335,0.015710806,0.000323332,0.0027735438,0.026452813,0.00068886834,0.03418185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93403953,0.001686071,0.05010727,0.0005645043,0.0001007984,0.00091663975,0.0049037714,0.000052390962,0.007629153],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840313,0.00081978843,0.00006666094,0.00020880425,0.00022051475,0.00028109638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98587567,0.010791283,0.00061104604,0.00011544929,0.0020434312,0.00056312355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047452473,0.001104424,0.0016428839,0.0035522426,0.0014942304,0.0026144623,0.0018622634,0.0018579263,0.007986374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017715743,0.00071139407,0.0016950301,0.00319818,0.00084595487,0.0007881363,0.0007918544,0.0017201845,0.00034263462],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035029624,0.0001634525,0.010922231,0.00015487759,0.00018151944,0.00014387908,0.000091758004,0.9649938,0.00005290185,0.006579932,0.0052929404,0.011072399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001273632,0.000036102756,0.0014481003,0.00003197536,0.00007147741,0.00001794064,0.00004324513,0.99497354,0.000018011715,0.0023076865,0.00090875884,0.00001571951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86328787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81081796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13671213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03603828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2750345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100403598","doi":"","title":"Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Warrant; Treaty; Crown (dentistry); Convention","score_opus":0.04078256199493512,"score_gpt":0.3187948458126955,"score_spread":0.2780122838177604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100403598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026973259,0.001607481,0.0017037572,0.11508321,0.00095331605,0.00036276848,0.0003948895,0.00042411804,0.85249716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19808951,0.000707226,0.001565134,0.031733442,0.00026699074,0.00021587595,0.0002670925,0.000076456716,0.7670782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885824,0.0023031621,0.000330159,0.0007696535,0.002600963,0.0054136943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98829204,0.0018417129,0.0006521376,0.0010361928,0.0026328673,0.0055450527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059283515,0.00043703165,0.000586141,0.0016034127,0.010562861,0.008023842,0.003191104,0.009867721,0.12271654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021056594,0.00047436974,0.00047913688,0.0011108859,0.0037376955,0.0046917857,0.01569078,0.005299808,0.009620213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007205853,0.0002411453,0.0053216433,0.00026331373,0.000025300567,0.0013097104,0.004657021,0.00068052456,0.00039849244,0.32356676,0.5392213,0.12424278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019451834,0.000053725602,0.0075059943,0.00035837793,0.000010664003,0.0004524074,0.0031143276,0.00043802228,0.00019405356,0.009845517,0.9779651,0.000042288673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17907137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41921115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17907137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01446999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057545315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41052777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100982594","doi":"","title":"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION / June 2002 Thompson / CHINESE PERSPECTIVES CHINESE PERSPECTIVES ON THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF AN MBA TEACHER","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marketization; China; Supply and demand; Work (physics); Business education; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.015315504040166383,"score_gpt":0.33354718164428765,"score_spread":0.31823167760412124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100982594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1713538,0.0529747,0.00053041626,0.31691596,0.0018014532,0.000035384644,0.00041096853,0.0000389672,0.45593834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7649817,0.033516034,0.00046935715,0.01184925,0.0012555306,0.00003384351,0.0001884294,0.000027594228,0.18767823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994925,0.00013667603,0.000020975247,0.000042573323,0.00015501255,0.00015224589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940693,0.00011183434,0.00005523439,0.00003730541,0.00011325853,0.00027539034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010801381,0.00024244355,0.00023111256,0.00095938484,0.0034967542,0.0044554234,0.0003069692,0.0011414177,0.025876103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013394041,0.00014912146,0.00012245265,0.0022375537,0.0025886304,0.0020591863,0.0013274185,0.0011787949,0.0010519215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074302836,0.00021231704,0.03758307,0.00060640863,0.000026324926,0.0011195778,0.07538394,0.00025016896,0.001124929,0.27206632,0.45265788,0.15889472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008885033,0.000023269942,0.060615428,0.00039325614,0.00001233167,0.0001629114,0.03644109,0.00014997041,0.0002658823,0.0065209726,0.89538974,0.000016340504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050316937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10786432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050316937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058973106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008650686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100048125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101083735","doi":"","title":"51 Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Pip’s Cognitive Development in Great Expectations From the Viewpoint of Space Product","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Product (mathematics); New product development; Cognition","score_opus":0.06563416272331053,"score_gpt":0.34252031383845943,"score_spread":0.2768861511151489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101083735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14814307,0.0004054288,0.0005582291,0.005932426,0.00012743167,0.00002339284,0.00025831498,0.000049972543,0.84450173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8907503,0.00065370876,0.00082960515,0.0008163096,0.00002006095,0.000028677074,0.00014856846,0.000029655519,0.1067231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995832,0.00006850693,0.000013798659,0.00006077829,0.0001395537,0.0001342062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990876,0.00013238244,0.00006036331,0.00007925569,0.00042290086,0.00021749026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005848121,0.00023621442,0.00014359111,0.0006675005,0.0028088253,0.006051963,0.0004042346,0.0005920922,0.054862868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002131362,0.00011718768,0.0001326581,0.0007657854,0.003662313,0.0013028354,0.0014168547,0.0008095495,0.0035470005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015363829,0.00020184088,0.0680035,0.0001430532,0.000029629624,0.0016101884,0.10571196,0.0006657698,0.0048374366,0.43176568,0.13944542,0.24743195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018926154,0.000054162552,0.24658296,0.00021835034,0.000027952321,0.000509255,0.11293761,0.00054016337,0.0012071569,0.024822611,0.61302507,0.00005587983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5412511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50103915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5412511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065743383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009191565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9229011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103316784","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Stopping of\\nMotor Vehicles in Canada and\\nthe United States:\\nA Comparative Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Power (physics); Proposition; Supreme Court Decisions; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.0740734188477374,"score_gpt":0.30944910478508225,"score_spread":0.23537568593734487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103316784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41589826,0.02394168,0.00068674854,0.036654267,0.00035466478,0.00009099299,0.001560587,0.000014715806,0.5207981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788063,0.006776169,0.00028086934,0.0045655835,0.000060193266,0.000027132448,0.00040009373,0.0000112812295,0.009072268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910095,0.0008652318,0.00023358306,0.00063685887,0.0034410048,0.0038138828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99129117,0.002089386,0.0008388594,0.0002686536,0.0046455646,0.0008663647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040321583,0.00028114652,0.0007029223,0.0054762354,0.015544224,0.010164959,0.0021957513,0.0029076112,0.005885503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015636448,0.00032329868,0.0005930066,0.008117442,0.01119425,0.0027037633,0.0025214301,0.004577969,0.00020800879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018432998,0.00009277378,0.054527793,0.00038947165,0.000252462,0.000736128,0.023362707,0.0016093294,0.00038020272,0.8462535,0.031809513,0.040401697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012430552,0.00019717675,0.40004948,0.0022265445,0.0009968318,0.00042490216,0.13972242,0.0016680607,0.0016371591,0.031170739,0.4214748,0.0003076084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98949254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117113665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117113665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10842147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8497231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104259451","doi":"10.71781/2587","title":"La reconnaissance du droit constitutionnel aux services d'un expert en droit criminel canadien","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Expert system; Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.009406467149788472,"score_gpt":0.21623771033575512,"score_spread":0.20683124318596666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104259451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958902,0.010096885,0.006228311,0.07715783,0.0022379085,0.00048759757,0.0010115699,0.00037447832,0.30651522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82166564,0.006486614,0.004653918,0.0052205482,0.0003818653,0.00019740603,0.00045311838,0.00014856407,0.16079229],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890793,0.004095285,0.00043538224,0.00067789305,0.0031417797,0.0025703777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804401,0.010316672,0.0010329218,0.0010705183,0.004890013,0.0022497221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009278251,0.0005971074,0.00051519496,0.0030730288,0.0083785355,0.0062887194,0.0017809788,0.004946845,0.020348521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054091886,0.0006769861,0.00064341206,0.0016773983,0.0032297908,0.002747954,0.003125783,0.006502621,0.0028083592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081604696,0.0016736595,0.08289504,0.0006527684,0.00015649897,0.024117298,0.10130604,0.002896249,0.004004013,0.07861805,0.18149129,0.5213731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019415513,0.00063449546,0.1457326,0.0018465533,0.00024228668,0.008657614,0.0890015,0.0028860706,0.0071005123,0.007300871,0.73616433,0.00023897666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4411768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43672702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5588232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010981665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027154451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8772177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104292295","doi":"10.71781/2457","title":"Extradition, extraterritorialité et application de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.012288852521777948,"score_gpt":0.2345604343380687,"score_spread":0.22227158181629075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104292295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026767101,0.0035964195,0.016267207,0.021259204,0.00073276216,0.00012341517,0.00021131181,0.0001057954,0.9309367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69674987,0.004093087,0.010250596,0.007265677,0.00030007144,0.00022585737,0.00018888591,0.00010938302,0.2808166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274665,0.001574438,0.00021817617,0.0010474554,0.0030556254,0.0013575779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949037,0.0014268953,0.00029438263,0.00075199275,0.002240903,0.00038220052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046200487,0.0005984685,0.0005630589,0.001544427,0.006985676,0.009970562,0.0019043828,0.004054005,0.016183008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00827452,0.0003570239,0.0007175233,0.0015464363,0.016163068,0.0043241335,0.004563113,0.006236706,0.0016485599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008379891,0.000008036069,0.00030127188,0.000036203113,0.0000049635623,0.00006982274,0.002271397,0.0001926199,0.00014104057,0.9885389,0.003012874,0.0054143905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053596254,0.00009208063,0.007917679,0.00075598515,0.00007145115,0.0003243613,0.0074549364,0.0010286076,0.0016581344,0.30277088,0.6777271,0.00014514859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3257718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46367213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6742282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016565384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035557672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6477512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104435345","doi":"10.71781/23675","title":"Les relations de coopération entre la police et le secteur de l'investigation privée au Québec : la perspective de l'enquêteur de police","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Criminal justice; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.009254813869465325,"score_gpt":0.23826897330507923,"score_spread":0.2290141594356139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104435345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6762883,0.004150475,0.0031031342,0.1304343,0.00017043426,0.00008389887,0.00027049502,0.000027046897,0.1854719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768808,0.00090697786,0.0003694441,0.0016211497,0.00003305351,0.000032275973,0.00003490151,0.000008382236,0.020113004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406946,0.0021618076,0.00007236443,0.00028347634,0.0007522817,0.0026606543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664886,0.004782882,0.0012609366,0.00028242695,0.003632545,0.0033923264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00518595,0.00029985438,0.0003620048,0.0020467988,0.01859086,0.0091971215,0.0015018772,0.0036539722,0.008926549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010343731,0.0004735073,0.00033125305,0.0032484762,0.011909673,0.0035033205,0.0040331674,0.003096532,0.00035134365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022148731,0.00014597217,0.07775201,0.00018542436,0.000113245536,0.0014944983,0.24495852,0.002258828,0.0010926666,0.59980845,0.03352815,0.03844091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010233102,0.00010838915,0.33362225,0.00070508546,0.00011023146,0.00025443314,0.39331618,0.0022228274,0.0004912494,0.030062387,0.23886843,0.00013624885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97674483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98561317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07127346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07127346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1184407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5171276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106822531","doi":"10.14288/cjur.v6i1.192518","title":"\"Playing Breathalyzer Roulette\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Supreme court; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Test (biology)","score_opus":0.09762835565376125,"score_gpt":0.3579168316254176,"score_spread":0.26028847597165633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106822531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10588726,0.0013986368,0.013349895,0.0079924585,0.0016191948,0.00095866574,0.0020024022,0.0028142969,0.8639772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2746462,0.0009714738,0.011493846,0.004955948,0.00011545903,0.00019783393,0.00076527847,0.00027959063,0.7065743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902964,0.0000960814,0.000019099021,0.00014111782,0.00044709904,0.00026700125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966633,0.0000444608,0.000023870934,0.0000414727,0.00014412183,0.0000797849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008964425,0.00053229596,0.00026862288,0.0007572745,0.0049261856,0.001493394,0.0013771817,0.0012043547,0.062303048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018277238,0.00021631272,0.00040339175,0.00034470446,0.0022729512,0.0010027202,0.0013957787,0.0014025231,0.013990589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005373182,0.0004882871,0.008323858,0.0004665391,0.000029425471,0.0022501354,0.008518848,0.000477862,0.009589331,0.11115794,0.46171525,0.39644527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006303082,0.00032056216,0.010774719,0.00021615218,0.000029787569,0.0010091638,0.005354034,0.00074055186,0.005200616,0.0031296231,0.9730896,0.000072220544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18360397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44937018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18360397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027470146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006652513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36507058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112360526","doi":"","title":"Arbitrary Detention Powers and Section 1 of the Charter: Two Critical Blind Spots in Luamba","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Section (typography); Power (physics); Legislation; High Court; Ex parte","score_opus":0.021085079488006718,"score_gpt":0.32170926150950147,"score_spread":0.30062418202149477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112360526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4157349,0.0028662663,0.038319528,0.04833671,0.0009776945,0.0007971048,0.0005451663,0.00020329379,0.49221936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581688,0.0005139494,0.004692824,0.013378382,0.00024361402,0.0002568632,0.000052370884,0.000046671543,0.022646615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793149,0.0061075953,0.00049512705,0.0020786922,0.004625062,0.007378655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98072916,0.012227669,0.0019139772,0.0012590967,0.0028749015,0.0009952232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013211683,0.0010703722,0.001618421,0.0031477667,0.011955024,0.013790248,0.0035130472,0.011916149,0.006498273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03491198,0.0011625893,0.0028147523,0.0019267934,0.0296124,0.008620774,0.006107123,0.015523595,0.00057724875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001557901,0.000055888755,0.0016283102,0.000044959295,0.000020888403,0.0006444844,0.002749927,0.0008014735,0.00034195077,0.98411095,0.005171537,0.0042737955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048441396,0.0006351068,0.010623928,0.0008842207,0.0004815572,0.0005438051,0.011681447,0.012211321,0.006162216,0.8869996,0.068797596,0.00049483427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26135793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3370519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26135793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022196453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023912013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51967335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114767725","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17887521","title":"The Right to Silence in Criminal Law: A Shield for Justice or a Loophole for the Guilty?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Silence; Privilege (computing); State (computer science); Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sanctions; Presumption; Lawsuit","score_opus":0.07033495285742981,"score_gpt":0.3498501494438844,"score_spread":0.2795151965864546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114767725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03386211,0.058268245,0.015961133,0.4373402,0.004802313,0.000050106148,0.00014472184,0.00010465221,0.44946665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8508144,0.023068378,0.003734661,0.058145363,0.0061355946,0.00008386443,0.000080897364,0.00020101901,0.05773576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385417,0.002845691,0.00030044152,0.0009000863,0.0012225482,0.0008770835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902953,0.0061219465,0.0007943282,0.0011618896,0.0007904953,0.0008360753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062651304,0.00033255672,0.00054409914,0.0009297118,0.0048822677,0.016448384,0.0015980889,0.009245261,0.003942185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015665267,0.0003410753,0.00046904042,0.000837601,0.058705688,0.01645958,0.0053109177,0.011525411,0.00138432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012911695,0.0000066570915,0.00014056882,0.000043412012,0.0000027462024,0.00008708644,0.008811392,0.000042232343,0.00013829109,0.9736511,0.0053626443,0.011701006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019038718,0.00006315996,0.00073040597,0.0009972518,0.000016717142,0.0003849077,0.008091934,0.00019027312,0.0005507868,0.6277266,0.36117968,0.00004928769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081037665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007156755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016448384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004836712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073527424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03509295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114804445","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17887522","title":"The Right to Silence in Criminal Law: A Shield for Justice or a Loophole for the Guilty?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Silence; Privilege (computing); State (computer science); Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sanctions; Presumption; Lawsuit","score_opus":0.07033495285742981,"score_gpt":0.3498501494438844,"score_spread":0.2795151965864546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114804445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03386211,0.058268245,0.015961133,0.4373402,0.004802313,0.000050106148,0.00014472184,0.00010465221,0.44946665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8508144,0.023068378,0.003734661,0.058145363,0.0061355946,0.00008386443,0.000080897364,0.00020101901,0.05773576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385417,0.002845691,0.00030044152,0.0009000863,0.0012225482,0.0008770835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902953,0.0061219465,0.0007943282,0.0011618896,0.0007904953,0.0008360753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062651304,0.00033255672,0.00054409914,0.0009297118,0.0048822677,0.016448384,0.0015980889,0.009245261,0.003942185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015665267,0.0003410753,0.00046904042,0.000837601,0.058705688,0.01645958,0.0053109177,0.011525411,0.00138432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012911695,0.0000066570915,0.00014056882,0.000043412012,0.0000027462024,0.00008708644,0.008811392,0.000042232343,0.00013829109,0.9736511,0.0053626443,0.011701006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019038718,0.00006315996,0.00073040597,0.0009972518,0.000016717142,0.0003849077,0.008091934,0.00019027312,0.0005507868,0.6277266,0.36117968,0.00004928769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081037665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007156755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016448384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004836712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073527424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03509295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115578585","doi":"10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.804","title":"Real Justice, Real Impact with the Prosecutors in Action","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Normative; Legitimacy; Legal certainty; Action (physics); Criminal justice; Enforcement; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.020510308607506748,"score_gpt":0.3485561938184933,"score_spread":0.32804588521098654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115578585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086628415,0.003919843,0.031272158,0.08384868,0.0013238578,0.00024314094,0.00008633715,0.00029741196,0.79238015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416613,0.00072943413,0.007918933,0.0055899746,0.0002522538,0.00010945181,0.00004984069,0.000102356804,0.04358649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98438233,0.0088005485,0.0005311756,0.0016112026,0.002920281,0.0017543447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875656,0.0041297064,0.0012803754,0.0023315917,0.0022416753,0.0024510676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012587573,0.00035822587,0.00032764865,0.0017614228,0.010548458,0.014129319,0.0017228976,0.003882206,0.011358073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025538987,0.00035865832,0.00035403922,0.0008842697,0.020419594,0.007283373,0.008800475,0.0046265023,0.001867247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027056238,0.00012103397,0.004201663,0.00007436838,0.000013280925,0.00044888418,0.021990757,0.0003305573,0.0004714443,0.91052383,0.012778873,0.049018286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048237307,0.00017581218,0.006587429,0.0006289409,0.000031108902,0.00078278856,0.0452802,0.0008892339,0.0012559363,0.42578658,0.51846725,0.00006647791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004697737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011331802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014129319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047932127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015282175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06657028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115599934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5922524","title":"Different but Equal: Indigenous Criminal Law in Canada, the U.S., and China","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Criminal law; Indigenous; Criminal justice; Legislation","score_opus":0.017583558735787812,"score_gpt":0.27988710391320737,"score_spread":0.26230354517741955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115599934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983335,0.0011985607,0.00007366474,0.0038495627,0.00001978825,0.000024379968,0.00033225332,0.0000037449233,0.011163049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971306,0.00055200874,0.00005081961,0.00033696214,0.0000073000438,0.000005851469,0.00013152398,0.0000025208556,0.0017825009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972409,0.00021776235,0.00006343202,0.00020859977,0.0005155691,0.0017536302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636495,0.00048322574,0.00048369882,0.00010331152,0.0013084216,0.0012563865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013538535,0.00027502386,0.00066623604,0.004497274,0.013799057,0.004775431,0.0017717497,0.0011592165,0.0040770285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052766018,0.00022104809,0.00031113037,0.009837865,0.0076259645,0.002152403,0.003771667,0.0026518977,0.0001488135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030975943,0.0003013039,0.7202773,0.0002569439,0.00021274842,0.002197859,0.11433927,0.0015048481,0.00047998014,0.08412971,0.012774343,0.063215956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022837945,0.00005049444,0.8218232,0.0003048411,0.000119515935,0.00019510953,0.15744378,0.0011569138,0.0002527989,0.005004156,0.013556577,0.00006987904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99588096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99885154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071490385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071490385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0992971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51870143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116122621","doi":"10.1017/9781009608282.003","title":"The Challenges of Preventing the Common Immediate Causes of Wrongful Convictions","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Liability; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Blame","score_opus":0.05103222579365938,"score_gpt":0.26672466217245594,"score_spread":0.21569243637879656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116122621","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013636651,0.17493665,0.030393014,0.5261358,0.0052385665,0.00015900184,0.00015154651,0.0002215901,0.24912725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40813324,0.3224877,0.0433374,0.118094385,0.009120506,0.0005154895,0.00028355015,0.00026617938,0.097761564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881236,0.00442736,0.00074072444,0.0008653383,0.0049665812,0.0008765253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9293941,0.059270456,0.002630647,0.0022092904,0.0053933533,0.0011020844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01556871,0.0006699031,0.00077104405,0.002990802,0.0036686866,0.009446966,0.0026107507,0.0069674402,0.0056732073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03233597,0.0005326708,0.00081734534,0.0014908037,0.012254565,0.008612778,0.005300947,0.013150101,0.0016695457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012754961,0.0000837668,0.0017174911,0.0008322632,0.000039965093,0.00045965923,0.0026960853,0.0015116761,0.00018542819,0.6723962,0.055494085,0.26457065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001737724,0.00007694197,0.0029196113,0.006016616,0.000055030025,0.0012251564,0.004993861,0.0012199908,0.00074533455,0.62866896,0.3539933,0.000067836394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005074502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008438207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01556871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049582515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016813781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08233613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237023","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.335","title":"The Increasing Settlement Costs of Mass Privacy Breaches","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Appeal; Intrusion; Tort; Mass tort; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.08748923583546808,"score_gpt":0.37850383064787857,"score_spread":0.2910145948124105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237023","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0808996,0.65931815,0.002398077,0.08705049,0.0016494351,0.00026055204,0.0011265369,0.000040293693,0.16725685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6846633,0.29216114,0.0017590414,0.008986953,0.0010794807,0.00011624552,0.00042721722,0.00002212626,0.010784627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96761703,0.006908236,0.0013095321,0.0017195425,0.019474799,0.0029707688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9360634,0.02362613,0.013500287,0.0015639309,0.02373384,0.0015123829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017794194,0.00045521263,0.00094894355,0.0061965715,0.0035692453,0.0071587446,0.0031173297,0.0038005188,0.012625092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04963601,0.0003723694,0.0013318767,0.005280973,0.006059911,0.0029817245,0.0023127736,0.0048200777,0.00048386425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006859541,0.00025729463,0.030167695,0.014613027,0.0013734438,0.0011501157,0.0034918163,0.0038946501,0.0010447598,0.19462003,0.095839314,0.652862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042544727,0.00058221695,0.21997717,0.040443692,0.0030304417,0.0022688066,0.011827594,0.0018873304,0.0024179886,0.040443566,0.6764543,0.00024140485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52593106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7083757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47406894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04538421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045455113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95372164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128868511","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Proposition; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.030156999611461857,"score_gpt":0.31012421283079283,"score_spread":0.279967213219331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128868511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0530124,0.017964628,0.012763455,0.048367035,0.0011444528,0.00009902181,0.00042826912,0.00005413212,0.86616653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799513,0.011606702,0.004450976,0.0144317765,0.0006577256,0.000118911405,0.00016013155,0.00003305081,0.16902778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272305,0.002853395,0.0003157663,0.0009964188,0.0022591974,0.00085220847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588514,0.00817534,0.0018438572,0.0011797153,0.002516253,0.00039965485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057083047,0.0003403302,0.0004728646,0.002247566,0.0037694692,0.0049957475,0.00096779334,0.0031423161,0.0103482045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011597028,0.00018944392,0.00046445229,0.0016173265,0.008481533,0.0034266408,0.0026458963,0.0024337312,0.0015806238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007892095,0.000015250585,0.0021669592,0.00010541576,0.000012715294,0.00013371145,0.0032402612,0.000068309935,0.00012002379,0.96285075,0.009208949,0.022069747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015922747,0.00009463549,0.012969954,0.00092608365,0.00005845076,0.0013027983,0.004972565,0.0007031892,0.0017971742,0.29904824,0.6780564,0.000054572116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017790593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026237221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017790593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005208908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054363455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037793458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130763993","doi":"","title":"Criminalisering van Compliance","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"other","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.3315964532403658,"score_gpt":0.5137177564045362,"score_spread":0.1821213031641704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7130763993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033697349,0.002098778,0.0013524275,0.007861652,0.001643162,0.00041449157,0.0067849634,0.001159774,0.975315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046161793,0.003348966,0.0025313324,0.006017392,0.0007758845,0.0005383191,0.010760066,0.0013482716,0.92851794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864356,0.0036167766,0.0011061094,0.0009909647,0.0056436975,0.0022068666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98367333,0.005947014,0.0012550154,0.0019709258,0.0050808135,0.0020729136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069257277,0.0008656497,0.0011418876,0.006373588,0.0044984245,0.01223977,0.0017934461,0.0064306245,0.4132539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05044154,0.0008852215,0.0009924031,0.0040181535,0.0016196097,0.00404861,0.005580002,0.004421129,0.13647921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079806654,0.00011034891,0.0017168715,0.00043643385,0.000024018014,0.00021965143,0.0005674555,0.00011261145,0.0001924367,0.040911257,0.8319572,0.1236719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035343895,0.000049876733,0.003378395,0.0008166179,0.000020830894,0.0002857017,0.0008295762,0.00028292363,0.0006495355,0.012076613,0.9815438,0.00003078348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028964834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0426743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4132539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002864766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012861422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8369221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132895183","doi":"","title":"Section 24(2): Before and After Grant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Permission; Criminal law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05806297065017399,"score_gpt":0.33912152839807275,"score_spread":0.2810585577478988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132895183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001768346,0.00073314883,0.003047518,0.016807428,0.01467759,0.002964771,0.007649326,0.0023712784,0.94998074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017669631,0.0010659664,0.0034271616,0.04335246,0.0050468454,0.0043712915,0.00266328,0.0014740501,0.9209293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825231,0.0022448227,0.0020893419,0.0029259054,0.0058086896,0.004408236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603483,0.012446671,0.0009815149,0.0077991285,0.016304446,0.0021199957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019421114,0.001986905,0.0034243895,0.0033731195,0.008992447,0.014267601,0.005230908,0.045743644,0.28370064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061240885,0.0031084705,0.0030729745,0.0034009186,0.0038147331,0.006462942,0.004371197,0.0136533035,0.4235136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019325133,0.00020392885,0.0006588804,0.00026363763,0.000033533524,0.00044193736,0.00042680535,0.00011060173,0.00082803145,0.043503463,0.93454534,0.018790632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015866282,0.0001070192,0.0023018671,0.00052971096,0.000042398766,0.00036244479,0.00033109618,0.0002730739,0.0006048664,0.009698721,0.9854777,0.00011247552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02763662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04684075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28370064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054952595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019058248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9490732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132983535","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Remand: Miscarriages of Justice in the Canadian Bail System","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Conviction; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Criminal justice; Plea; Adversarial system; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.04256560876055109,"score_gpt":0.3976901203036725,"score_spread":0.3551245115431214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132983535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.859317,0.0020844552,0.0031216475,0.038760643,0.00028318228,0.00022337392,0.00036709124,0.00009132022,0.09575125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795019,0.00096038054,0.001186959,0.0029705586,0.000041465024,0.000070603426,0.000083769155,0.00003603674,0.015148418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98789096,0.0032962386,0.00037734516,0.0010880923,0.004742423,0.0026049716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98388624,0.0075718006,0.002444923,0.0010518401,0.0036643776,0.001380987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007911003,0.00034134334,0.00058879814,0.0026035146,0.04071137,0.0061441166,0.002632693,0.0029895583,0.004350847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040679842,0.00062062696,0.00038435654,0.0031216138,0.015287693,0.0033194795,0.006096403,0.005181585,0.00041008805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010169159,0.00007515765,0.02865775,0.00017587429,0.000018928708,0.0051314156,0.79666716,0.00032590269,0.0012636716,0.10911185,0.0188705,0.039600052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029778466,0.00008726924,0.06907776,0.00085704913,0.00007237717,0.0021582018,0.69645363,0.0023005523,0.0016625539,0.018032035,0.20891918,0.00034959937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9738357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087506674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087506674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09370614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6349083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133051254","doi":"","title":"Wrongful convictions in Canada and defence counsel: It&apos;s time for mandatory professional education and competency safeguards","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Continuing professional development; Continuing education; Legal profession; Criminal law; Professional responsibility; Professional association; Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.024901201941362167,"score_gpt":0.42221759202034015,"score_spread":0.397316390078978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133051254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44553804,0.010274,0.00063174573,0.40949398,0.0008943622,0.00008240095,0.0002895025,0.000044198012,0.13275178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402414,0.0051477947,0.00058705005,0.019395478,0.00011574675,0.000023674738,0.00011805915,0.00002666472,0.034344096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386287,0.00066863233,0.00011050098,0.00029929023,0.002035913,0.0030227157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98394287,0.0017117148,0.0009485501,0.00017768031,0.0038574438,0.009361649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032128769,0.00019176472,0.00049897656,0.0012380158,0.03014436,0.009099296,0.0020030702,0.004257357,0.009762971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01668972,0.00039546716,0.00031358414,0.0025011934,0.009396211,0.0024789197,0.0045592072,0.009262069,0.00045178755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019126887,0.00035854915,0.10143948,0.00036548456,0.00006956886,0.0035531013,0.23784783,0.0006727793,0.0008094869,0.17969257,0.24737841,0.22762139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004618625,0.00010648931,0.21932086,0.0010168164,0.00006243704,0.00082780235,0.35676304,0.00051298586,0.0005520687,0.014286872,0.4063054,0.00019912663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99307925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.138674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.138674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34363434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133089547","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Trial: Morality Play and Rule of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Criminal law; Permission; Rule of law; Due process; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.09998112650732016,"score_gpt":0.42494406741610885,"score_spread":0.3249629409087887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133089547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025105212,0.00924923,0.015277594,0.16234349,0.001236826,0.00007289917,0.00013600732,0.000040122522,0.7865386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512881,0.003009289,0.002787168,0.007135286,0.0007503876,0.000082147664,0.000036841368,0.00006930813,0.034841362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778577,0.012280983,0.00057480624,0.0019230833,0.004427219,0.0029362848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97055763,0.021182004,0.0014843511,0.0017559421,0.0032192413,0.0018008751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020702574,0.0004106565,0.0010933008,0.0013559522,0.009497665,0.019810515,0.0022492283,0.00940499,0.013792758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06435289,0.00048903906,0.00064412225,0.0013663,0.05202523,0.009621109,0.0063749775,0.012497848,0.001355869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011962231,0.0000052897267,0.00011391457,0.000014376062,0.000004229304,0.000037969658,0.0008184605,0.00010551645,0.00001806367,0.9920488,0.004248448,0.0025729293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021474,0.00001004781,0.00043961787,0.000098136734,0.0000077268,0.000041307358,0.0011364551,0.0004970099,0.00005244792,0.9732189,0.024463573,0.000013188831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041074056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03854713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041074056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011374238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018066877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10948694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134507383","doi":"","title":"The programmed death of the \"juge d'instruction\" to the \"procureur-roi\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Death with dignity; Order (exchange); Tort","score_opus":0.06464920727855736,"score_gpt":0.3327394691165588,"score_spread":0.26809026183800144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134507383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13899356,0.0041133575,0.02693712,0.073818736,0.0011998235,0.00014613823,0.00021691338,0.00035147727,0.75422287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74520946,0.0013844761,0.0037194984,0.012481873,0.00015571971,0.00015591363,0.000080225014,0.00024979736,0.23656316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915181,0.0035722295,0.00020973085,0.0012185985,0.001886909,0.0015945025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929765,0.0018422854,0.0008210623,0.0009418878,0.0020611032,0.0013572202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067216232,0.00046018197,0.00036061084,0.0007914267,0.008201831,0.009658045,0.0014356859,0.0032131774,0.011163662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014565402,0.0003225724,0.000363766,0.00060571596,0.022081599,0.0060014906,0.0068830606,0.00737382,0.0028494883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046052388,0.0000336691,0.0025507053,0.00007467837,0.000008262914,0.00012113567,0.03109755,0.00016717984,0.0006586608,0.9065363,0.018583206,0.04012254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023147208,0.0001685934,0.011370483,0.00071950234,0.000027472868,0.00023977544,0.021333622,0.00040612472,0.0020816384,0.062384926,0.9011652,0.000079506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062393267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11951395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062393267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014719413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026793543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12406021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135887461","doi":"","title":"The role of the Right to a Fair Trial in an Era of Social Polarisation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Fair trial; Right to a fair trial","score_opus":0.06743268374124958,"score_gpt":0.46145384281175256,"score_spread":0.39402115907050295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135887461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030942135,0.005500686,0.0083959075,0.2858757,0.002283167,0.00006869283,0.00011239348,0.000030313164,0.6667909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356863,0.0014680746,0.0022640303,0.02409769,0.0015547724,0.00016367018,0.00003354611,0.00009712038,0.034634855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94511926,0.036308438,0.0015177081,0.00579279,0.0051971166,0.0060646925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91058713,0.06585478,0.004171293,0.0075569623,0.0052616466,0.006568264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063643746,0.00045028576,0.0012554963,0.0021853955,0.013717268,0.022613863,0.0029048768,0.023272017,0.019408247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116467975,0.0008057991,0.00080975087,0.0013050211,0.08706881,0.024654703,0.012532279,0.021598458,0.0021279773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024647314,0.000010722557,0.00011100175,0.000013443047,0.000003903202,0.00005342781,0.0024428936,0.00005731006,0.00002468554,0.99217457,0.003107214,0.0019761224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003300043,0.000012720483,0.00029684874,0.00017417202,0.00000848541,0.00005002882,0.0018966051,0.00013808855,0.00007679697,0.96212906,0.035164874,0.00001930752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012754083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012799229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063643746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096628675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016598579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33658427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139462042","doi":"","title":"R. v. S.A.B:Putting self-incrimination in context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Legislation; Chose; Context (archaeology); Search and seizure","score_opus":0.06872243031623743,"score_gpt":0.3339493224873253,"score_spread":0.26522689217108786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139462042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057443053,0.017118987,0.0064461594,0.3739142,0.0022583725,0.00019734654,0.00063808274,0.00031682604,0.5416669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6986385,0.0075632585,0.0052843704,0.22123496,0.0013019816,0.0001121816,0.000175925,0.00014412413,0.06554475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858102,0.0023498472,0.00044889355,0.0012208787,0.0061690887,0.0040010745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746616,0.006351285,0.0007497491,0.0004943874,0.0036382698,0.0013002526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008928887,0.00069798756,0.0012485143,0.0019666625,0.014422156,0.013454725,0.0036353942,0.027204663,0.0035646118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017475579,0.0010373495,0.00091220514,0.0019670546,0.018925747,0.004268751,0.0033752648,0.022463052,0.0009203513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041774652,0.000022508584,0.0015165372,0.00009395981,0.00002109529,0.00080837635,0.0031715734,0.00029212635,0.0011999616,0.9273471,0.05674906,0.008735954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020681042,0.00030669628,0.014346174,0.0017399223,0.00037021565,0.0009922547,0.006338758,0.0024508692,0.006403677,0.34751275,0.618843,0.0004887872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85230047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9261955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85230047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03238952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07925506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2971387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148972342","doi":"10.70675/880d715bz4b00z4eb7z8189ze3f19eb21717","title":"L'auto-incrimination","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Proposition; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03723981696856513,"score_gpt":0.37620084564433603,"score_spread":0.3389610286757709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148972342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06632418,0.015703855,0.010194927,0.044282224,0.0005652611,0.00006275637,0.00024021305,0.000039602943,0.8625869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71890473,0.011894926,0.0029132608,0.0074383146,0.00037149581,0.00008210226,0.00008157093,0.000027580607,0.25828603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953099,0.0017297753,0.00014523425,0.00047918074,0.0015416776,0.0007942856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919586,0.004379916,0.0010077751,0.00072563504,0.001635856,0.0002922153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036524034,0.00032539302,0.00033040714,0.0013993824,0.0036756545,0.0063123996,0.0009454844,0.0023883565,0.010628386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059175957,0.00022343404,0.0004346703,0.0012095533,0.0067227823,0.0027366038,0.0026123805,0.002119129,0.0014341493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008554145,0.00001943122,0.001970691,0.00011939163,0.000012169864,0.00013788532,0.006573717,0.00012201049,0.0002024052,0.9542536,0.006194836,0.030385178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016245483,0.00010233892,0.01106573,0.0009342294,0.00005284173,0.0008848688,0.007303483,0.0006603355,0.0024736372,0.15641443,0.82003915,0.000052700714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030509716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046723705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030509716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056915227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009156319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060664237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161795956","doi":"10.82308/1543","title":"Research on entrapment in China--with reference to the experience in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Power (physics); Jurisprudence; Medical jurisprudence; Human rights","score_opus":0.11931989009463131,"score_gpt":0.4436338901052293,"score_spread":0.32431400001059796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161795956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683635,0.0027941163,0.00012355625,0.004998272,0.000055245073,0.000049007944,0.00016974652,0.0000073893193,0.023439072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841388,0.0039783427,0.00012941909,0.00056429126,0.000011341217,0.000015530994,0.00012329275,0.000007858979,0.011031083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974039,0.000338544,0.0000897419,0.00023476315,0.0007062639,0.0012266643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540824,0.00076943455,0.00048254128,0.00016182743,0.0019580738,0.0012198688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019941365,0.0004467849,0.00050854974,0.0033650785,0.01960681,0.0040097353,0.0015251422,0.0009989856,0.0052321088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051109036,0.0003472925,0.00034280878,0.01145319,0.00754337,0.0024390763,0.0031645063,0.0021668,0.00024606506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010395596,0.00017631032,0.155132,0.0003545733,0.00003116877,0.004081505,0.74346507,0.00026750535,0.0006359208,0.023843847,0.010936871,0.06097128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009162644,0.00006778431,0.18667823,0.00030049589,0.000022473683,0.0006610963,0.75620466,0.0002526971,0.0003674101,0.00058767677,0.054780647,0.000067637215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99596655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09818024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09818024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1240001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71235085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161799514","doi":"10.82308/52543","title":"The theory, design and reform of the exclusionary rule: A comparative study between Canada and China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Charter; Rule of law; China; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Substantive rights; Judicial review; Judicial reform","score_opus":0.041376451915862436,"score_gpt":0.3446385841210607,"score_spread":0.30326213220519826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161799514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8833688,0.0049908212,0.0018059764,0.0051151114,0.000050044306,0.00013337069,0.0003538499,0.00001580909,0.104166254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994548,0.0012647996,0.0006432776,0.00018789459,0.0000044120693,0.000015148701,0.0000836967,0.000004588802,0.0032481486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968364,0.0005428113,0.00009680954,0.00025753886,0.0012683339,0.0009980153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526656,0.0011493516,0.0004489507,0.00017598695,0.002367216,0.00059190637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002480413,0.00021350449,0.00041129743,0.0035483218,0.009076417,0.0039431006,0.0012823866,0.0007074546,0.0035527153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050574616,0.00016532377,0.00035768855,0.008821272,0.006648393,0.0014340306,0.0017264812,0.0011213035,0.00009638325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018304176,0.00015636456,0.19468413,0.0008528179,0.00013515793,0.0033288633,0.10739415,0.003837461,0.0016497734,0.56172144,0.008741308,0.11731545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051515966,0.00013300689,0.5973593,0.0011048738,0.00022823943,0.0005652329,0.21989176,0.007478207,0.0014028132,0.018089795,0.1534995,0.00019573918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9805509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09350103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09350103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11476943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67840064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161811057","doi":"10.82308/54264","title":"The Canadian criminal legislative response to hate crimes /","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Criminal justice; Discretion; Criminal law; Hate crime","score_opus":0.04296545352274738,"score_gpt":0.38049060603525525,"score_spread":0.33752515251250786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161811057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11819405,0.011441196,0.0010579823,0.12379154,0.001287668,0.00023857271,0.0014054684,0.0000776538,0.74250585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7050477,0.014984938,0.00203614,0.018131478,0.00037947492,0.000077677585,0.00072599883,0.000058056394,0.25855848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535394,0.000361377,0.00007904435,0.0002450982,0.0025080338,0.0014526113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466234,0.00043730278,0.00028953538,0.000087474946,0.0037619295,0.0007613546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023734944,0.0003108235,0.00026402302,0.002416889,0.013306203,0.0066559645,0.0012476768,0.00175885,0.012858069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007447667,0.00026789858,0.00034131538,0.0026122883,0.0039052966,0.00093746645,0.0014254297,0.0020360316,0.00084413996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084680185,0.00007698374,0.02646318,0.00058052974,0.00004121492,0.0005866574,0.038421735,0.0011264993,0.0016320751,0.47734162,0.34241876,0.111226045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012505997,0.000025506977,0.07320496,0.00045299463,0.000043123906,0.000119529934,0.029576002,0.0004793456,0.00090329803,0.004258749,0.8908621,0.00006187491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12060547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12060547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21453135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163563281","doi":"10.18192/politika.8207","title":"Abolishing Mandatory Minimum Sentencing as a Beneficial Reconciliation Measure","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Politika – Undergraduate Journal of International Affairs Politics and Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Term (time); Deterrence (psychology)","score_opus":0.03230516201697104,"score_gpt":0.33382970056727107,"score_spread":0.30152453855030004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163563281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24263702,0.0024262127,0.15604216,0.04939044,0.005752641,0.0011376513,0.0007079882,0.0010350582,0.54087085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96065736,0.00022397592,0.022779843,0.0036809144,0.0007716377,0.0003667762,0.000096600765,0.000055267847,0.011367691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96795714,0.012730631,0.0017630009,0.0025980775,0.011619267,0.0033318582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415353,0.037765287,0.0063280687,0.0066341492,0.0054570455,0.0022800586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017888647,0.0005086971,0.0014722547,0.0013505947,0.0024687906,0.0041620564,0.003879452,0.0049787797,0.017195266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07506443,0.00056756067,0.001229872,0.0010364125,0.003383338,0.005084608,0.005256103,0.0068712095,0.0016280009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000389278,0.00035688412,0.0022092613,0.00045641608,0.00011754589,0.00008405586,0.00034923383,0.0025373949,0.0014210471,0.8912903,0.017075527,0.08371304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041038444,0.0021202548,0.023143202,0.0010703707,0.00062695297,0.00056584814,0.00085800496,0.027627341,0.008260104,0.88221085,0.05292734,0.00017939143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006412624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023761143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017888647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001812311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006199964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09460533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72209951","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.157","title":"Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Criminal law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08588962696890812,"score_gpt":0.396669655413895,"score_spread":0.31078002844498687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72209951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6910559,0.0030451044,0.0005088167,0.08349675,0.000526121,0.000046247478,0.00009039235,0.000022575425,0.22120813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988896,0.0006486231,0.000094200695,0.004613425,0.00011640944,0.000022166316,0.00002640839,0.0000056136373,0.005577126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826176,0.0053584785,0.0004074121,0.0005446517,0.0021460603,0.0032817177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865155,0.0048409174,0.0047774147,0.00059482973,0.0011942855,0.002077026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072399843,0.00012758144,0.00037112724,0.0015487655,0.009311764,0.0058043557,0.0008777769,0.0055549433,0.0043947645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022215633,0.0002369963,0.00027194712,0.0015508352,0.005663836,0.0022318487,0.0068885386,0.0055754236,0.00047308343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017690784,0.00031607735,0.114838816,0.00023565927,0.000085436324,0.0025739905,0.09966638,0.00063900434,0.001592286,0.6475846,0.05788442,0.07440637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010915738,0.00033180867,0.34663105,0.001903567,0.00011516723,0.0020258208,0.1280983,0.0012395812,0.0020495206,0.055035807,0.46230733,0.00015280332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032469533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059983443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032469533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006891256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01171584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06456107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78769640","doi":"","title":"Gilles Létourneau, Pierre Robert. \"Code de procédure pénale du Québec, annoté\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0204237918361292,"score_gpt":0.2635721819699471,"score_spread":0.2431483901338179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78769640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008594738,0.25741768,0.011175538,0.37868553,0.03134127,0.00045555638,0.0111167235,0.0010121225,0.30020085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10370604,0.059538882,0.009755193,0.09248438,0.0034970276,0.00061490445,0.0027143073,0.00064866384,0.72704065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962876,0.0006585981,0.00023066321,0.0002823868,0.0019405147,0.0006002729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074215,0.002202198,0.00019792242,0.00019293361,0.0063612023,0.0003036085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035511437,0.0012446162,0.00074742193,0.003515255,0.011859652,0.0038548638,0.0028977313,0.008749652,0.019093292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013736009,0.0007360082,0.0009243023,0.0044070072,0.003308076,0.0027427268,0.0011882767,0.007227178,0.005277405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023775921,0.000011372507,0.00081580534,0.00010339201,0.00000963753,0.00012213849,0.001214496,0.00013437374,0.00009845611,0.023997651,0.956365,0.01710383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018575602,0.00001364814,0.014165393,0.000654515,0.000028512088,0.00011602025,0.0016656533,0.00022715621,0.00043666948,0.00609827,0.9765015,0.000074032556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95457757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9722987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045422435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021165371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025440747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15356624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79884336","doi":"10.21991/c9j380","title":"Failing Students by Taking a Pass on the Charter in Pridgen v University of Calgary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02695350916186013,"score_gpt":0.2769865945668648,"score_spread":0.2500330854050047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79884336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8247431,0.0007464605,0.00059055345,0.08288101,0.00071732205,0.00014247806,0.00011032049,0.00003101535,0.090037756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643162,0.00035501146,0.00043022927,0.014449057,0.00006777845,0.00003425505,0.000047445814,0.000022338303,0.020277709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982457,0.0031649873,0.00062055467,0.0012015366,0.0034768311,0.009079012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97957397,0.00825526,0.00199699,0.00069277216,0.0035675378,0.005913462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012085671,0.00042367406,0.0013018864,0.0017962124,0.036761563,0.012447051,0.0028854692,0.011647532,0.0055584847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046075046,0.0007674536,0.0007062901,0.0022718064,0.016580803,0.0033241715,0.00829696,0.023792788,0.0006996135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004838764,0.00063073816,0.1400509,0.00021545615,0.000115926945,0.014811821,0.34809646,0.0011881728,0.0013531221,0.3247302,0.11724265,0.051080696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020970247,0.00046610256,0.2382915,0.0012548611,0.00032420817,0.0016150599,0.4969685,0.0014932074,0.0070930333,0.08036493,0.17140743,0.0005115185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6233746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8472529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37662542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03162968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05429296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75768685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80164192","doi":"","title":"Les appels administratifs au Canada (Administrative Appeals in Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Standard of review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07004114231247068,"score_gpt":0.331068986672506,"score_spread":0.26102784436003534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80164192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3977907,0.00812282,0.0018319378,0.047587886,0.0007995241,0.00027501365,0.0044010705,0.00024232102,0.5389488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.699105,0.0014887294,0.00060128653,0.0033827485,0.0001167715,0.000057535104,0.0004950253,0.000065206514,0.29468763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341375,0.0005530808,0.00019209784,0.00066689803,0.0023094837,0.0028646635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926301,0.0015648709,0.0004511141,0.0002408414,0.0034257802,0.0016872673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025049138,0.00036925965,0.000510192,0.0024246639,0.026093852,0.009444455,0.0018870941,0.004094281,0.03297436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008499899,0.00060900976,0.0004668692,0.0050249845,0.005555122,0.0012575244,0.0024570078,0.0038089587,0.0021448713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018629691,0.00012562994,0.042768158,0.00029027613,0.00006670967,0.0024892315,0.052022085,0.0012531596,0.0012438344,0.50277513,0.33701193,0.05976754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030194315,0.000030620296,0.07309857,0.00016420399,0.000036767808,0.00023293907,0.018237093,0.0010872764,0.00049372495,0.003807552,0.90269023,0.00009094611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99570054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14571331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14571331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15243562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99085146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80501292","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1489","title":"Book Review: Essays in the History of Canadian Law, Volume VIII: in Honour of R. C. B. Risk, by G. Blaine Baker and Jim Phillips (eds)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Volume (thermodynamics); Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.021528734559580084,"score_gpt":0.2571350853691778,"score_spread":0.2356063508095977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80501292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033862863,0.798531,0.00036301804,0.07358241,0.06797637,0.000060745373,0.00093445944,0.00011956895,0.058093835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00775626,0.62958336,0.000859352,0.027071267,0.04753402,0.00011731423,0.0013670573,0.00018837194,0.28552297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981438,0.00014477517,0.00007240854,0.00013348385,0.001295415,0.00021011998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99093354,0.0016212204,0.00040669664,0.00018740162,0.005994587,0.00085664826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001531622,0.0016166253,0.0017735604,0.008706033,0.004268826,0.00598859,0.002531771,0.0023650783,0.048887905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01056312,0.00059534435,0.0007421428,0.016572626,0.0033319583,0.0032902542,0.0013902163,0.0027784002,0.01662596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037655664,0.0000020660066,0.00002564703,0.0001432583,0.0000020192217,0.000007750166,0.000028550818,0.000017525352,0.0000136895205,0.00052523986,0.9863049,0.012925509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031557286,0.0000031484778,0.00048169005,0.0005234356,0.000008424165,0.0000388036,0.000086536675,0.000014558456,0.00002106892,0.0007369544,0.9980737,0.0000085387455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4483612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73503715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55163884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026146427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041139606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89150286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W812244214","doi":"10.21991/c9h091","title":"Judicialization or Renunciation? Judges in Today’s Landscape of Anti-Terrorism Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Judicial review; Political science; Constitution; Renunciation; Suspect; Constitutional law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0675757815920345,"score_gpt":0.33689811964666444,"score_spread":0.2693223380546299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W812244214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06374898,0.022471912,0.009406642,0.72910905,0.0058370843,0.00007340037,0.000086341235,0.00013519205,0.16913143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111776,0.0048208614,0.0022251857,0.060261853,0.0055392506,0.00008424764,0.000051349572,0.00012184462,0.01571775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526609,0.025158634,0.0016818261,0.006485328,0.006854557,0.007158877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95677423,0.026006972,0.0030800686,0.0037257674,0.00639489,0.0040180557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053132467,0.0002576151,0.00076317374,0.0019054925,0.012417222,0.022066379,0.0037389763,0.011981182,0.0048641455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08259173,0.0006830938,0.00058823696,0.0017497045,0.042243384,0.0149859525,0.0063806227,0.017913233,0.000804504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028758745,0.000029391647,0.0008803252,0.00006280355,0.0000101297655,0.00019453955,0.0076750973,0.00018720322,0.00038024932,0.9444661,0.028312506,0.01777292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012692761,0.00009076861,0.0047073932,0.0005550872,0.000033253575,0.00023035363,0.0138873,0.00094286865,0.0008400475,0.52671564,0.4517327,0.00013759492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013424067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012710261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053132467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009377682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011576136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28099465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8127670","doi":"10.1093/nar/22.3.332","title":"SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nucleic Acids Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Economic Justice; Freedom of information; Order (exchange); Section (typography); Law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Business; Psychology; Advertising","score_opus":0.05381806012043803,"score_gpt":0.3684252796566635,"score_spread":0.31460721953622545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8127670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086578395,0.0010849634,0.00366311,0.0072632963,0.0026361456,0.0005380681,0.028382868,0.0029311196,0.95263463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018170292,0.00079853507,0.0010397063,0.0011612126,0.00008773701,0.00016525113,0.004436196,0.00048071513,0.9900136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952436,0.00075459847,0.00035089842,0.0008913417,0.0021942032,0.0005653724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870186,0.001960983,0.0004910981,0.00384501,0.005287938,0.0013963277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038924871,0.0014072091,0.0012183447,0.0023229427,0.0031385722,0.008434079,0.0016486369,0.0031510573,0.7874075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011733161,0.001159618,0.0006927747,0.0047009727,0.0015600028,0.0030362685,0.0030400339,0.0042507746,0.75393444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007573304,0.000048908583,0.0004944732,0.00015109984,0.000012128257,0.00014287222,0.000113721944,0.000102660466,0.0008174996,0.01702382,0.8826893,0.09832777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000851986,0.000009077989,0.00066229963,0.000095145435,0.0000027259273,0.000041117848,0.0000816139,0.00008184601,0.00016437964,0.0010178487,0.99782455,0.000010950414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07517841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09856638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9248216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00701611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022057785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30323732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813148417","doi":"10.1515/9780773580961-012","title":"Confidential Information and Privacy Related Law in Canada and in International Instruments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Internet privacy; Law; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.011870945948242085,"score_gpt":0.21630626146355642,"score_spread":0.20443531551531433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W813148417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021762913,0.033994973,0.0015464374,0.05962899,0.0009826098,0.00005991267,0.0003642577,0.00007956805,0.88158035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4882871,0.03911877,0.0023864754,0.015042206,0.00037414653,0.000062639796,0.0004109168,0.00010157838,0.45421618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476767,0.00046745647,0.000086616674,0.00029428792,0.00269805,0.0016860263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748623,0.0007139604,0.000120601246,0.0001169911,0.0010647185,0.0004975269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022078403,0.0005122586,0.00039195898,0.0023522938,0.015946614,0.013287548,0.0019619016,0.0038668185,0.006892543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064606336,0.00042087762,0.0003492063,0.0077747293,0.02086712,0.0029907255,0.0025085695,0.0045529227,0.0004847003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010754522,0.000018579665,0.0012038453,0.00008740559,0.000008518285,0.00021235216,0.013436546,0.00032934532,0.00008827724,0.85093343,0.09429947,0.039371595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006243664,0.000010992133,0.006520268,0.00039620604,0.000020636568,0.00014019287,0.013618571,0.00047564926,0.00023556205,0.04476833,0.9337543,0.00005301145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99448293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99642855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17633605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17633605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26384577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9553334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824787426","doi":"","title":"The American Exclusion Rule Debate: Looking to England and Canada for Guidance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Law; Adversarial system; Confession (law); Magistrate; Political science; Adjudication; Suspect; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Search and seizure; Statute; Warrant; Supreme court; Constitution; Probable cause; Economic Justice; Business","score_opus":0.01913004110962151,"score_gpt":0.31507131750670125,"score_spread":0.29594127639707973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824787426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019750162,0.12996198,0.00054543075,0.6390071,0.012645324,0.000090414855,0.0006075225,0.00008211743,0.21508509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07633349,0.10451025,0.003411083,0.47629422,0.007857486,0.00025887846,0.00063613174,0.0003203803,0.33037803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222785,0.001213256,0.0002852215,0.00067150133,0.0030070127,0.002595235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936886,0.0029164993,0.0003918795,0.00039232898,0.005176118,0.0017543277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006796138,0.0011570383,0.001982213,0.0052695908,0.024561984,0.018709118,0.0064434214,0.025008716,0.03951007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015922852,0.00057734945,0.0012096178,0.008142038,0.016319677,0.011602797,0.00471105,0.01643002,0.004982305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025699563,0.00004382241,0.00041890494,0.00022022404,0.0000069673915,0.00022314342,0.0010044845,0.00014018826,0.000056383127,0.2379981,0.73978376,0.020078275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137937395,0.000004723234,0.0011307705,0.0008870108,0.000006634891,0.000036674155,0.001707533,0.000115729614,0.000034440294,0.015611377,0.98040384,0.000047584657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97603476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9776754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12500863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12500863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15889864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9070053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825869049","doi":"","title":"THE POTENTIAL LEGAL AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF LOWERING THE CRIMINAL CODE BAC LIMIT IN CANADA","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALCOHOL, DRUGS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Criminal code; Enforcement; Limit (mathematics); Code (set theory); Law enforcement; Law; Speed limit; Political science; Penal code; Criminal law; Business; Engineering; Transport engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04301882283141481,"score_gpt":0.30200008905452924,"score_spread":0.25898126622311446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825869049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3063126,0.011693996,0.0037636997,0.453811,0.0011376406,0.00037829138,0.0016657771,0.00023829818,0.22099878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297492,0.005716885,0.003489556,0.038725417,0.0002510059,0.00010507962,0.0004119888,0.00003530087,0.021515608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989494,0.0014001615,0.00026611186,0.0005443779,0.0037899013,0.0045052976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863985,0.0022922126,0.0011880542,0.00021805205,0.0065586967,0.0033444294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004110995,0.00034329985,0.00042186436,0.0021517577,0.009736812,0.005473735,0.0031097813,0.003941133,0.005480312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023399102,0.00037968668,0.0006999162,0.0026403153,0.0036633015,0.0013980224,0.0022663255,0.003484166,0.00026423862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066162396,0.00068672217,0.20232241,0.0010359962,0.0002660367,0.0027882822,0.00713625,0.02221269,0.0045677484,0.33945504,0.1712637,0.24760355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005376375,0.0007544031,0.5324461,0.002164705,0.0008117512,0.00078969967,0.024827087,0.025953583,0.005138029,0.047093913,0.35887575,0.0006073882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99510795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99691015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11863401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11863401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2682833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W832122363","doi":"10.1163/15730352-40012001","title":"Understanding Russia’s Low Rate of Acquittal: Pretrial Screening and the Problem of Accusatorial Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eesti Teadusfondi","keywords":"Acquittal; Discretion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24749195321097,"score_gpt":0.32619949215944577,"score_spread":0.07870753894847576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W832122363","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.416129,0.49808836,0.005061738,0.03131866,0.0005027616,0.000047420115,0.000203273,0.000030278072,0.048618484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89672065,0.09871203,0.0006665405,0.0026903655,0.00033852932,0.000015253226,0.00006024202,0.0000066988514,0.0007896745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884437,0.0072760433,0.0010664962,0.0008736699,0.0017844269,0.0005556613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725893,0.018213054,0.0065609305,0.000532866,0.0018835469,0.00022034055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01324416,0.00011375635,0.0005152743,0.003693597,0.0010190256,0.0033048936,0.0007366107,0.0015732822,0.0007343345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030348666,0.00020465397,0.00024204608,0.0035812263,0.0036331879,0.0023452758,0.0011357854,0.001202509,0.00016448757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029179914,0.000119605524,0.32296616,0.006224408,0.00055150135,0.001968496,0.028464528,0.0011849081,0.0015639565,0.15404066,0.0072696195,0.47535437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031557618,0.00044525386,0.78612155,0.013276057,0.0007080057,0.0034511236,0.03385886,0.00118573,0.0022623525,0.048012186,0.11054533,0.00010192929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009156665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018999102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01324416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018825245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003402506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07004267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W916319588","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2806","title":"Book Note: Speaking Out on Human Rights: Debating Canada’s Human Rights System, by Pearl Eliadis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pearl; Human rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05604149994742987,"score_gpt":0.3409321369111774,"score_spread":0.28489063696374756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W916319588","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006363761,0.03396338,0.00061460456,0.84470165,0.027456736,0.000062423525,0.0005051094,0.000070666756,0.091989055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012880594,0.019605378,0.0011088795,0.49273175,0.0123394625,0.00012364787,0.00019939974,0.00017652032,0.46083435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980714,0.00028613373,0.00007211978,0.00027960114,0.001012111,0.00027863408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931078,0.003647197,0.00011883561,0.00014840673,0.0024348688,0.00054285035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024921077,0.00077370147,0.0007432908,0.0017648678,0.017766846,0.01094877,0.0024672234,0.018311841,0.01830035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010762516,0.00075660984,0.000457847,0.0031158791,0.008144996,0.008966639,0.0019129589,0.017186057,0.004340962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017119512,0.0000029178457,0.000038762028,0.000013284897,9.851932e-7,0.000014676446,0.00023783577,0.000023862493,0.000010078839,0.012418253,0.98482436,0.002413289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076129545,0.0000043776845,0.0004715984,0.00017188197,0.0000052068804,0.000028748256,0.0009856614,0.0000843682,0.0000640065,0.010057716,0.9880883,0.000030444991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82208663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92792743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97188693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028113073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050174788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35792226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W937076574","doi":"","title":"Chronique de jurisprudence: Arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada en droit criminel, cuvée 2007","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.00995786280144436,"score_gpt":0.2750865707742725,"score_spread":0.26512870797282817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W937076574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1667672,0.14026886,0.0033218449,0.36457738,0.00635133,0.00022767718,0.0022769086,0.00021369105,0.31599513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71898353,0.03051964,0.0025807116,0.0267782,0.0015999647,0.00012340274,0.00045515876,0.00021999486,0.2187395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865144,0.0018202878,0.00042879776,0.0010735423,0.0067943563,0.0033686426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776829,0.0071240896,0.0010127232,0.0004708293,0.010342502,0.0033669632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008330195,0.0006268325,0.0008224318,0.005486531,0.023867523,0.01812796,0.0015759682,0.007296669,0.009600561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025947714,0.0009152339,0.0006936233,0.0075612552,0.0111017255,0.0036726175,0.004191216,0.013053955,0.00067848846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029544352,0.00011681747,0.011447074,0.000519398,0.00008407886,0.0012232313,0.048204057,0.00092647993,0.0014818923,0.5856998,0.26433146,0.08567024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027448577,0.000028856975,0.031222371,0.00047412986,0.000027130216,0.00013529231,0.013902194,0.00025872912,0.0006288818,0.005201014,0.94801754,0.000076268225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99043465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1653151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1653151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22507706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96811616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93869013","doi":"","title":"Traité général de preuve et de procédure pénales, 7e édition (P.Béliveau, M.Vauclair).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03227399737557953,"score_gpt":0.30198079831733,"score_spread":0.2697068009417505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93869013","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002672481,0.7811353,0.031305164,0.030581564,0.02334992,0.00047142367,0.019210812,0.0021170492,0.10915632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036142107,0.4614738,0.061416313,0.011970317,0.018980568,0.0021734862,0.027123118,0.0025372803,0.378183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950604,0.0013212493,0.00089972746,0.00044562257,0.0020646686,0.00020824888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391174,0.0028168752,0.00063639134,0.00047183968,0.0019795464,0.00018362691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005472671,0.0029802092,0.0019874687,0.008394183,0.0017225017,0.0034650583,0.0029171184,0.004614219,0.022929503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012150351,0.0017986849,0.0018877005,0.0057693287,0.0027232454,0.0033963576,0.001582978,0.0045828177,0.013167805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008115615,0.00011516368,0.0010008854,0.0012126386,0.00005097361,0.00013627775,0.00064669206,0.0007266411,0.0005637873,0.023990005,0.79196537,0.17951044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035485133,0.00006796211,0.012425562,0.001505751,0.000028750495,0.0009367101,0.00025219025,0.0004912246,0.00037233645,0.011386684,0.97245365,0.00004367431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06328237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058448583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040190294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052146884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12582803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W950222520","doi":"","title":"Reactie op artikel Cor van Montfort over ontwikkelingen rond toezicht","year":2010,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028271435110794385,"score_gpt":0.3303729805875001,"score_spread":0.3021015454767057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W950222520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007811235,0.049510367,0.028707415,0.07206499,0.063085146,0.00025808718,0.00732407,0.0039996146,0.76723915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04770675,0.012091541,0.009605299,0.005045718,0.0042276355,0.00019471321,0.0026035476,0.0050609857,0.91346383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547404,0.00145341,0.00020499661,0.0005128178,0.0019916808,0.00036312145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680734,0.0018388995,0.0001348456,0.00028976295,0.00070265663,0.00022652061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027659761,0.0018319417,0.0009624266,0.001874339,0.00271791,0.011793859,0.0014943293,0.0038381035,0.29369128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012866048,0.0010468678,0.00094322016,0.0014884591,0.0017583853,0.0040534255,0.004154961,0.0059777284,0.077714086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712673,0.000050401162,0.0001433211,0.0005032707,0.000039541465,0.00039163994,0.0023098374,0.0012373583,0.001307301,0.043129377,0.83329207,0.11742447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086019545,0.000005595152,0.00009468727,0.0003088917,0.000008508373,0.00008982422,0.0003841275,0.00025888195,0.00044076671,0.00556035,0.99282163,0.000018039096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023175072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030760234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29369128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034345489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003572746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9525550","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1059","title":"The Ontario Tenant Protection Act: A Trust Betrayed","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.055566843752669084,"score_gpt":0.3433718898515991,"score_spread":0.28780504609893004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9525550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23715596,0.0054939906,0.0032966237,0.2655418,0.000552949,0.00009908667,0.0004554259,0.00008806532,0.48731613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90276694,0.0015497591,0.000405556,0.010235451,0.00009264289,0.00003399679,0.000061079125,0.0000332593,0.084821366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99088144,0.0013207316,0.0002908063,0.00044904248,0.00427222,0.0027857323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98611414,0.004696232,0.0018068432,0.0009417061,0.0039605573,0.002480605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046368716,0.0001760478,0.0002916007,0.0009142856,0.014746741,0.005999707,0.0012274389,0.0041694324,0.006340087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020124322,0.00039524594,0.0003403205,0.002121306,0.010646051,0.0028867715,0.004103675,0.0031885356,0.0005252716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015927629,0.0000328958,0.042612355,0.00022703926,0.00004378678,0.0018496189,0.105605006,0.0004977562,0.0009561527,0.6717173,0.1268914,0.04940731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003710118,0.00006250888,0.059234142,0.00040925635,0.0000732562,0.00045860463,0.038804285,0.00072212995,0.00051745656,0.026211202,0.873368,0.00010203793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9520552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07274715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07274715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10484545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W980562234","doi":"","title":"Entrapment as defence: a brief overview of the law in England, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, and USA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IIUM Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; New england; Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.10889036203707377,"score_gpt":0.30822707856558434,"score_spread":0.1993367165285106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W980562234","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014282356,0.5876118,0.0023438935,0.02377394,0.0016602874,0.0001239351,0.0002524338,0.000039488245,0.36991185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13473763,0.58721423,0.0019940617,0.010399739,0.00097515277,0.00015115153,0.00025524184,0.000057654765,0.26421523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986987,0.0003617141,0.000074568154,0.00009942993,0.00037376888,0.00039183834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991259,0.00042765017,0.00009620069,0.000028156168,0.00021101363,0.00011099443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010741425,0.00066807965,0.0006309644,0.0028517463,0.0035728663,0.0066623706,0.0012427452,0.0047729407,0.008616143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020645503,0.0004804119,0.0004133301,0.0051765246,0.006077424,0.0057526515,0.002156566,0.0028995448,0.0013132328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003039625,0.00007756589,0.0019752695,0.0018128426,0.000013703329,0.0008874369,0.014089353,0.0007785897,0.00023623156,0.71393377,0.0955296,0.17063534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003593464,0.00004613463,0.009084523,0.002939664,0.000011871212,0.0006771623,0.0079338355,0.00032636125,0.0001196047,0.029648423,0.949177,0.000031798474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29578534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57652813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7042147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016214902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02263488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5881274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W991412592","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399.017","title":"Judges, bias and recusal in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Range (aeronautics); History; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07987745961855523,"score_gpt":0.22494656796141513,"score_spread":0.1450691083428599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W991412592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08158595,0.04786529,0.0017540138,0.1485406,0.0017286263,0.000103388425,0.0005848528,0.00010428729,0.71773297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8373778,0.020356972,0.0013442709,0.019680832,0.00029019074,0.00006238317,0.00022166251,0.00012307773,0.12054284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867424,0.0015377253,0.00031611603,0.00093489763,0.0069742133,0.0034946788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98758715,0.0038639032,0.0005578925,0.00035434606,0.006158087,0.0014785823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006812563,0.00031004185,0.0007624908,0.0028100756,0.026612166,0.014325411,0.0030389791,0.0044861543,0.007292098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025682326,0.0006425967,0.00028213763,0.0064068167,0.020492082,0.0030470456,0.003929072,0.006267113,0.00054701924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035111912,0.000026407028,0.005020667,0.0001779055,0.000021313985,0.00053434545,0.032039948,0.0004317688,0.00016659319,0.78186184,0.12705371,0.05263044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075325326,0.000018910696,0.0155975185,0.00089570595,0.000045344506,0.00024326748,0.019769063,0.00061150553,0.000361353,0.09401725,0.86823547,0.00012938518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99054223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99578625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14787023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14787023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24829692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98834974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}