{"meta":{"query_hash":"b8afe4694597","filters":{"topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence"},"cohort_total":1849,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":1849,"exported":1849,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b8afe4694597","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Criminal+Law+and+Evidence"},"results":[{"id":"W1011321566","doi":"","title":"Canadian Fundamental Justice and U.S. Due Process: Two Models for a Guarantee of Basic Adjudicative Fairness","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Function (biology); Economic Justice; Process (computing); Constitutional right; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022103056163389728,"score_gpt":0.3240392176661477,"score_spread":0.3019361615027579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1011321566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583368,0.008098001,0.007619352,0.018835505,0.00015857768,0.00054754614,0.000028846218,0.000021340964,0.0063540507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965265,0.0022166348,0.00014371156,0.00016975739,0.0003436078,0.000013960377,0.0000012372279,0.000010088339,0.0005745471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978615,0.00006335862,0.00020735641,0.00016425454,0.0002562485,0.0014472728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935085,0.00009382637,0.00013683281,0.000064116706,0.00019051986,0.00016382955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014954736,0.000099558674,0.0001660384,0.0000920166,0.00068828004,0.00005153713,0.0002552844,0.000051218987,0.00002407443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010431986,0.00009461591,0.00005921732,0.00014665654,0.00018671746,0.0005342589,0.000010664133,0.00042745913,0.0000032491166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120873505,0.00005202749,0.00025411605,0.00004544158,0.000069698166,0.0000022248432,0.016305566,0.00041258783,0.000057570007,0.94486904,0.00017730717,0.037633535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012902289,0.0004421188,0.00017681898,0.00013518758,0.00038325353,0.00019891198,0.12188719,0.0029415872,0.00015039157,0.8632103,0.008829628,0.0003543517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07225337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8543124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7820591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011782773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065290458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1012675263","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-48807-3_13","title":"The Noninteger Powers x v","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.0498016887190147,"score_gpt":0.31004797011928037,"score_spread":0.2602462814002657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012675263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000029605199,0.0011535698,0.000009044891,0.009005967,0.0005465288,0.00010297571,0.0000013859157,0.00005441914,0.98912317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025783712,0.008225073,0.000026401063,0.0003958124,0.00039076814,0.0000018308613,9.236706e-7,0.00001240525,0.9883684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906665,0.000014752242,0.00012525002,0.00015835048,0.00041785807,0.00021712901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931806,0.000261039,0.00005852066,0.00019582616,0.00008198658,0.00008455068],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002699734,0.00011248085,0.000110328605,0.000017160044,0.0010459662,0.00007560898,0.00036631845,0.00016901073,0.002917898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062703795,0.000070155074,0.00013219313,0.0000117670415,0.0007809817,0.00005838664,0.000039750073,0.0002077052,0.0018327414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002849609,7.809847e-7,9.216245e-7,8.0228875e-7,0.000006412392,0.000010454818,0.00083152764,6.5887406e-8,1.1687575e-7,0.6959768,0.29877862,0.004390655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124226235,0.000010399803,0.0000025736379,0.000024797137,0.000010075596,0.0000024935268,0.00039080475,2.6174538e-7,7.573065e-7,0.007159393,0.9922751,0.00011089756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017709704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007630809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69349647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007424121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021563395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101276832","doi":"","title":"The Deep Structure of Roncarelli v Duplessis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitution; Public law; Common law; Constitutional law; Statute; Judicial review; Judicial discretion","score_opus":0.016868314041546123,"score_gpt":0.26957536089354744,"score_spread":0.2527070468520013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101276832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8881551,0.002051172,0.00062691706,0.011459024,0.00020975573,0.00014303278,0.000007869565,0.00003074633,0.09731639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699426,0.0007455304,0.0006661655,0.00000855646,0.00002818756,1.7075731e-8,5.3003225e-7,0.0000022734541,0.001554499],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994144,0.000045983372,0.000044837914,0.00009375005,0.0002511565,0.00014991454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995271,0.0000690574,0.00009306485,0.00015239637,0.0000978487,0.000060533326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012170349,0.00004905112,0.000102129095,0.0000068495474,0.00055817945,0.000009083477,0.00037587967,0.000059655853,0.0025421914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038483136,0.000046160196,0.000069920876,0.000049944258,0.00047533,0.00025826538,0.000053500757,0.000046271405,0.0000045266033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025087546,0.00008583001,0.0030499178,0.0000777139,0.000112746224,0.000018156945,0.47156107,0.00054249604,0.004913971,0.3749897,0.0013848941,0.14301263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071495574,0.000175618,0.22085257,0.00009520084,0.00014375123,0.0000013386907,0.6994391,0.000030096993,0.0008168512,0.0027439722,0.07470543,0.00028110243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56240076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80702347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37224573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018872101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011111166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102111148","doi":"","title":"P. Béliveau, M. Vauclair. \"Traité général de preuve et de procédure pénales\".","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.027499393336718022,"score_gpt":0.30168254457846216,"score_spread":0.27418315124174414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102111148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7898273,0.01007313,0.0026415812,0.083663955,0.0011425812,0.0009005828,0.00010547208,0.000294281,0.1113511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961819,0.0030366413,0.0056620603,0.002653659,0.0021261638,0.000083507184,0.000018073346,0.00007752485,0.024523387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957502,0.0005057195,0.00056004536,0.0007440824,0.000538064,0.0019018761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979121,0.00031290267,0.0002713996,0.0004980125,0.00016926228,0.00083629723],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017690173,0.00035271616,0.00054376293,0.0001043112,0.0006306377,0.00027074473,0.0009750432,0.0007063551,0.0005305972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047840894,0.00055860874,0.00044712724,0.00069141935,0.0008307178,0.0008278135,0.00014516471,0.0010021869,0.0007667244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013175227,0.0006998578,0.009773733,0.001370931,0.00012615278,0.0010423483,0.07967235,0.003636946,0.0015776146,0.8873761,0.006929198,0.007663013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019511548,0.0008705838,0.04579589,0.005043888,0.00085874397,0.0020781877,0.010287427,0.00058267894,0.0031431923,0.6668324,0.2603333,0.0022225808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012154823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012861167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2534041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035849377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022959583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103650110","doi":"","title":"Judicial Deference to Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Its History and Future","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Adjudication","score_opus":0.07450710772692355,"score_gpt":0.3185725959454522,"score_spread":0.24406548821852864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103650110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71285015,0.00052883266,0.000035024965,0.027927972,0.0006015467,0.00020297866,0.0000044442395,0.000018652565,0.25783038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669385,0.00005443981,0.00006873449,0.0013782657,0.00029829858,0.0000060959264,3.5104964e-7,0.0000018954302,0.0014980981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.00009690917,0.00010340338,0.00015030819,0.00021194505,0.00019499227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995737,0.00013252647,0.00002301968,0.00005221335,0.000048266105,0.00017028986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033053075,0.00005627718,0.00010815071,0.00002285975,0.00009581893,0.000012724392,0.00011412768,0.000033901328,0.00045136033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022425839,0.000051873434,0.000009417764,0.00008561395,0.000048119324,0.0000876821,0.000018202114,0.00006680031,0.000011873972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009361842,0.00003126519,0.014656609,0.000021807567,0.0000054662623,0.000024517789,0.02787873,0.000001952612,0.00022777013,0.793945,0.1264734,0.036639858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006814848,0.00004914875,0.03560754,0.000014408623,0.0000037647933,4.9383453e-7,0.007918678,0.000007581563,0.00006336249,0.00048383095,0.9556683,0.00011476559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9410151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058765704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018767647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49420792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1036582426","doi":"","title":"Arresting developements in Canada: arrest warrants and mareva injunctions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lloyd's maritime and commercial law quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.02053901811546427,"score_gpt":0.2786765007738661,"score_spread":0.2581374826584018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1036582426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488093,0.00032949646,0.000120423356,0.004069055,0.00072419876,0.00028607424,0.000014510317,0.00003880857,0.045608096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818164,0.00003969545,0.0002617877,0.0010761949,0.00019854461,0.000009187796,0.000006165976,0.000010064294,0.00021672802],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984482,0.000111760775,0.00032569873,0.00026985962,0.00030999657,0.0005345026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925613,0.0002724131,0.000060079466,0.00011083696,0.000058141493,0.00024240647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072584185,0.00014811993,0.00021130596,0.00005338572,0.0008305754,0.00011875908,0.00015599393,0.00007780797,0.00007064905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050878738,0.00016251404,0.000020764164,0.00020726462,0.00023462549,0.0003271383,0.000035080015,0.00020123282,0.000007799307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015442258,0.00009602752,0.31685263,0.0000652768,0.000027194867,0.00019468674,0.010819004,6.152286e-7,0.00006145887,0.097716406,0.0018720978,0.57214016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008212281,0.00020697727,0.7814204,0.00026107545,0.000053380667,0.000011334313,0.018096685,0.000024564859,0.000016745684,0.0065725497,0.19187202,0.0006430055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97564083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99904054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5714972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018736155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038915194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66271305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W104895083","doi":"","title":"Understanding Canadian Health & Safety Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17999776635710504,"score_gpt":0.3618470343098047,"score_spread":0.18184926795269965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104895083","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23603904,0.0007903954,0.043862347,0.45959097,0.004531583,0.002834376,0.000043378757,0.00037010055,0.2519378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959761,0.00021000087,0.0011227023,0.001983393,0.000048637146,0.000020483714,0.00005085039,0.0000043555997,0.00058348663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988692,0.00008473683,0.0001941894,0.00019126925,0.00029094506,0.00036966315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999419,0.000037788992,0.000057123,0.000051335093,0.00006841958,0.00036634054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006130774,0.000090378795,0.000106017236,0.00006146583,0.0024139334,0.0000947101,0.000087696855,0.00007549989,0.00012035331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016538257,0.00008606732,0.000014776284,0.00009938525,0.00013683001,0.00039131666,0.000025971016,0.00011878781,0.0000387914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015884832,0.00002076629,0.00025964176,0.000013594933,0.000005365907,0.0000053325175,0.018985868,0.000002348722,0.000045339708,0.9758787,0.00045290872,0.004314251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016689989,0.0001847951,0.056821823,0.003573549,0.00002379895,0.000023736193,0.09015205,0.00002015456,0.00095259026,0.37651598,0.4688131,0.0012494434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1135093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5918202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75993705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010538775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036076442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110013805","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Principles in Substantive Criminal Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Public law; Constitutionalism; Proportionality (law); Criminal justice; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Theory of criminal justice; Comparative law; Criminal procedure; Democracy","score_opus":0.046645919272257086,"score_gpt":0.31247206400690913,"score_spread":0.26582614473465205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110013805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34699398,0.00024947184,0.00036213352,0.002303962,0.0005155943,0.00023033166,0.000011687199,0.00010271004,0.6492301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966139,0.000033860742,0.0006805018,0.0011651166,0.00041736514,0.000019141475,0.0000056537847,0.000005809794,0.0010586125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981513,0.0002656105,0.00027411952,0.00032827238,0.00051123236,0.00046944825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905306,0.0003076932,0.00007450068,0.00020298462,0.0001166989,0.00024508842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011709735,0.00013766214,0.00020165429,0.000029867684,0.00067633926,0.00014922717,0.0003516279,0.00011501416,0.00066501374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047124038,0.00013820069,0.00007512672,0.0001950678,0.0022127223,0.0005373027,0.00006115319,0.00025829367,0.0005851274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029809953,0.00004529887,0.0045620077,0.0000145667145,0.0000041622043,0.000016263039,0.0010981987,0.000028911356,0.000095261115,0.99357384,0.00026804756,0.0002636143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034085367,0.000046785735,0.005603832,0.00012384939,0.000021267828,0.0000050592284,0.001845447,0.000029904288,0.00043311823,0.01854479,0.972737,0.00026805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022018278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15061615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97502905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000163653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019889133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11296928","doi":"10.29173/alr380","title":"The Unprincipled Use of Originalism and Section 24(2) of the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Charter; Originalism; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Foundation (evidence); Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11695368785822897,"score_gpt":0.34910727004004066,"score_spread":0.2321535821818117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11296928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5455038,0.17614007,0.000016918346,0.16587271,0.0037954533,0.0031445646,0.000008219419,0.00003468135,0.105483614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659247,0.030111155,0.000021229704,0.0008771243,0.00008981781,0.000012064722,4.014574e-7,0.0000045800234,0.002958942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923265,0.0001972242,0.00017793823,0.00008015796,0.00021359377,0.00009843094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991579,0.00034233034,0.00012862419,0.00021298202,0.0001093754,0.000048760703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071898993,0.000049470873,0.00013907839,0.000003228293,0.00018245005,0.000022614639,0.00016771948,0.000025255764,0.000018920668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052953325,0.000025066644,0.00005548584,0.00012622128,0.00036573972,0.00015499504,0.00004094934,0.000051674808,0.0000061737646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064640867,0.0000113923525,0.0009986958,0.00032904468,0.000010624502,1.6451115e-7,0.0019092449,4.448142e-7,0.000019404144,0.99227846,0.002940429,0.001495634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004328394,0.000014881752,0.00033852138,0.0009043285,0.000053256666,0.0000018175022,0.00006806149,0.0000010607131,0.00004050442,0.0008840074,0.9976161,0.000034188444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071732774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07410602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99467564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021516975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008675863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94278914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134600537","doi":"10.71781/2096","title":"L'admission des confessions et le risque d'erreur judiciaire : toute vérité est-elle bonne à dire ?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.074205232566288,"score_gpt":0.386992971778698,"score_spread":0.31278773921241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134600537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49937585,0.0026448912,0.000048325957,0.0092480695,0.0012614545,0.0009103502,0.000089072164,0.000010189924,0.4864118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7411102,0.000541477,0.0021699276,0.00010445652,0.00029541535,0.000054657517,0.00065129856,0.00004841046,0.25502414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646354,0.0005540569,0.0006925339,0.0009083862,0.00064408715,0.0007374182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795276,0.0003409521,0.00050163467,0.00042628756,0.00031150755,0.00046686566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010421498,0.0005009669,0.0006823026,0.0000937896,0.0028275459,0.0006492093,0.0012747869,0.00066630647,0.005469474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044500845,0.00049411267,0.0002513232,0.0005346493,0.0005518612,0.0011165455,0.00028345315,0.0005980675,0.0011011426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004935524,0.0021623806,0.0042576394,0.000503806,0.0001613138,0.00038575218,0.13648765,0.00041711034,0.0065695914,0.04333097,0.058098804,0.7471314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005662877,0.00017466015,0.009565074,0.004260196,0.0003275311,0.000008991149,0.07908216,0.00021167863,0.0046203067,0.002815397,0.897412,0.0009557409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14669542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2809344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83931315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002078329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024069073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1157515190","doi":"","title":"Les sanctions d'une règle de droit législative incompatible avec la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés: le reading in, le reading down, l'interprétation large, l'interprétation atténuée, etc.!","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Reading (process); Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010672089932790554,"score_gpt":0.22717949051902464,"score_spread":0.21650740058623408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1157515190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72567016,0.003410763,0.010866523,0.0028058633,0.00067502615,0.00032093376,0.000042488904,0.000087899316,0.25612035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96107,0.00054897275,0.0013920302,0.00013206805,0.000088365756,0.000028391793,0.000036791498,0.000026752397,0.036676645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968256,0.000921018,0.0004658005,0.0005820809,0.0003840535,0.00082149776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982382,0.00052894105,0.00032467127,0.00023021412,0.00028262925,0.00039532635],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012835043,0.00031859454,0.00035553344,0.00035403977,0.007338142,0.00013827052,0.0002906145,0.00030703287,0.0000773241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004034013,0.0004341294,0.00019488316,0.0009668216,0.00081005134,0.0018124508,0.00008868772,0.0005384212,0.00003850722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014372983,0.00029192207,0.021290438,0.00007937604,0.00009267773,0.0004962661,0.24232297,0.0033240789,0.0025831244,0.7242224,0.00040094255,0.0047520343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003227854,0.00040225478,0.18614958,0.003363468,0.00044740413,0.0014436252,0.34174004,0.011820552,0.0064029545,0.07718509,0.3660405,0.0017766794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73905206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7169369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091438675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021268758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1160208503","doi":"","title":"Privacy Law in Quebec – Substantially Similar but Different?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Business; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03534685976345713,"score_gpt":0.302771382965586,"score_spread":0.26742452320212884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1160208503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82276505,0.000042550815,0.000047164613,0.01169939,0.00012508061,0.00019318203,5.0610055e-7,0.0000599803,0.16506712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762928,0.000044552442,0.00016776368,0.00064385636,0.00009289582,0.000012893447,8.894486e-7,0.00000519598,0.022739183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900264,0.00008763953,0.0001538025,0.00016746693,0.0002676027,0.00032085786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995457,0.00012098997,0.000026509924,0.00014675762,0.00004916541,0.00011090225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017011275,0.00008084839,0.00011968811,0.000026918104,0.00018234664,0.00018324913,0.000292273,0.00006604683,0.0033432106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007907531,0.000064813255,0.000041800336,0.00011218995,0.00020172849,0.00053621904,0.00004817616,0.00008167503,0.00043523396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000780131,0.00007940048,0.011244336,0.000010933762,0.000003892794,0.000010107664,0.008135605,0.0000012179578,0.0013291904,0.9692812,0.005567091,0.0043292386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008318558,0.00010390808,0.19948553,0.00015217524,0.000030035484,0.0000013009861,0.028164558,0.00015045522,0.0040301536,0.0664964,0.6995372,0.0010163808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77870035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8835897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90278476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007832077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006535287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116898662","doi":"","title":"Oversight of regulations by parliamentarians","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Process (computing); Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018489391304202685,"score_gpt":0.3008221842825642,"score_spread":0.2823327929783615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116898662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11395997,0.17446183,0.00006249864,0.34104154,0.0042392043,0.004215042,0.0013547002,0.00015725539,0.36050794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257949,0.04978114,0.0007213768,0.018286183,0.00030711995,0.00005905346,0.00017401188,0.000026142783,0.004850062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988921,0.000084140185,0.0002604616,0.00018554795,0.00024346614,0.00033426651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896497,0.00006425895,0.00009412208,0.00028275786,0.000060009963,0.0005338924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047022427,0.000099361314,0.00021505031,0.00004888199,0.00033064585,0.000024399324,0.00031611393,0.00006005551,0.008416975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093614246,0.000103137056,0.00009459457,0.00024317352,0.00028590157,0.0002331918,0.000012779853,0.0001471285,0.00010357709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014027667,0.0000199056,0.005038247,0.0001955022,0.000018957731,0.000005813919,0.0005659834,1.3537253e-7,0.0002994547,0.011249305,0.96777,0.014835306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050955932,0.000013030434,0.0004431129,0.00042961963,0.000067096924,0.0000017066737,0.0005006334,6.161676e-7,0.000059654325,0.00023250878,0.9980827,0.000118380056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7540682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9306809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81183493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017795102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068797293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99248946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1198391","doi":"10.1136/thx.30.5.528","title":"Hubert Reid, claire Carrier. \"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et doctrine\".","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017139067819786264,"score_gpt":0.29459102472406995,"score_spread":0.2774519569042837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1198391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62639236,0.001508757,0.00045231037,0.11130942,0.00026340413,0.0006278086,0.000042830594,0.0004565384,0.25894657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808465,0.00079051143,0.00084479456,0.0014909165,0.0017593827,0.00006626577,0.0000057345605,0.00002760982,0.014168275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979098,0.00019148628,0.0003128777,0.00043357068,0.00037746617,0.0007748205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.0002201204,0.00012895721,0.0003825651,0.00012350896,0.0003820964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011206786,0.00015887375,0.00027292283,0.00006196441,0.0005590935,0.00015083284,0.00066558656,0.00020966158,0.0006443462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053909747,0.00021987503,0.00016404658,0.00032152084,0.00028653606,0.00055983436,0.0000833457,0.0003638186,0.00027654637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025488084,0.0004911701,0.18318745,0.0006804674,0.000096589196,0.00064728176,0.087521926,0.001405982,0.0024027172,0.3979208,0.26935613,0.0560346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023387419,0.00006759265,0.007408064,0.00028447312,0.00006297302,0.00012061842,0.00124941,0.0004180067,0.00073204696,0.004378023,0.9846043,0.00044062926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042968303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3699091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71524817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009547812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013806445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96340466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W122484647","doi":"","title":"Rationalizing Similar Facts: A Comment on R. v. Handy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Rationalization (economics); Convict; Law; Value (mathematics); Reasonable doubt; Jury; Character (mathematics); Criminal trial; Verdict; Federal Rules of Evidence; Admissible evidence; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.034232438337659044,"score_gpt":0.32472442659687745,"score_spread":0.2904919882592184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W122484647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23270644,0.012868805,0.026831787,0.42559153,0.0024965103,0.0009787376,0.0000059825175,0.00022661968,0.2982936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265265,0.0021561089,0.000064627595,0.0028317554,0.00023029186,0.0000033816261,7.388939e-7,0.000007862899,0.0020525805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756134,0.00028080674,0.0001663593,0.00012328608,0.00045569797,0.001412517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952227,0.00013186279,0.00008380096,0.000080619364,0.000072541465,0.00010890483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029006798,0.00008849065,0.00009905165,0.000048195554,0.0013530459,0.00016500367,0.00017935541,0.000048543745,0.00021496644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035473073,0.00007867585,0.00007678855,0.00011870272,0.00009022922,0.00020683772,0.0000072274283,0.00058990414,0.00007645969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016319647,0.000044126245,0.00030637998,0.0000011650674,0.000021791375,0.0000028892507,0.0013570862,0.000029552039,0.00004072159,0.992988,0.003401048,0.0017909118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020784423,0.00016224838,0.000032049382,0.00002333,0.000013859197,0.00002621425,0.008913498,0.0000034023924,0.00011597025,0.25120118,0.7391977,0.0001027133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003750996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038113706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010712427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002508192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1227982871","doi":"","title":"Research guides: Aboriginal Law in Canada: On the net","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; RSS; Law; Key (lock); Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.18732428310621058,"score_gpt":0.424469577641156,"score_spread":0.23714529453494543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1227982871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008591306,0.0004676454,3.4676495e-7,0.03070697,0.0009945816,0.00031690468,0.00001968815,0.000019553907,0.9666152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35487524,0.004763269,0.00010117179,0.011243382,0.0035503618,0.00014728805,0.000023608824,0.000053398966,0.6252423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615455,0.00072086253,0.00029996637,0.0003665449,0.0016427309,0.0008153766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730164,0.0017974545,0.000064570246,0.00043304337,0.00025058453,0.00015273169],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040519484,0.00016691785,0.000240903,0.00009257878,0.0007730217,0.00013844007,0.0014661714,0.00019923599,0.005719953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037906604,0.000107075044,0.000050721403,0.0004421008,0.00071106374,0.0001083437,0.000073498246,0.0010593889,0.0002072673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006622327,0.000005672598,0.00005676365,0.000007277112,0.000002642044,0.000028312204,0.0007703678,3.7222148e-7,8.8230564e-8,0.47115955,0.5277406,0.00022171502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025312655,0.000030550724,0.00015601549,0.00020898951,0.0000048030156,4.3358767e-7,0.009064893,9.652841e-7,0.000009451779,0.00949694,0.980857,0.00014461413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46166262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014336745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012535004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99518895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123169991","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2543-0_7","title":"Privacy Impact Assessments in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law, governance and technology series","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Toolbox; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Range (aeronautics); Privacy by Design; Business; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.024180525692469222,"score_gpt":0.28993600147874166,"score_spread":0.26575547578627245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123169991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017824102,0.0042779758,0.0000016096818,0.0050743017,0.0003392561,0.00025876047,0.00009005871,0.000088996945,0.97204494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81526417,0.009487862,0.00007636895,0.00015005433,0.000058275324,0.000013205953,0.0000038610488,0.00002174295,0.17492445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883616,0.000010620655,0.00021042573,0.0003211471,0.00026080053,0.00036082396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935323,0.000032434673,0.00022267782,0.00027492928,0.00005268913,0.00006403792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010022842,0.00022158906,0.00035199165,0.000038537844,0.00021285116,0.00002891072,0.00040035523,0.0003900241,0.0003416659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041879757,0.00021408036,0.000035573685,0.00006711783,0.0008677715,0.00031784174,0.00015560827,0.00037009278,0.000011019941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017540111,0.000004175602,0.00531075,0.000017056866,0.000019825433,0.00011262723,0.0001867971,3.762647e-8,0.0000025837328,0.98475784,0.0016610997,0.007909683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071846596,0.00006356421,0.0022039253,0.00019172122,0.000016737504,0.000009536141,0.0002163501,8.8476106e-8,0.000029862103,0.18115221,0.8158094,0.00023473043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9525436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006197289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014650419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87299436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1247556158","doi":"","title":"Statutory Interpretation in the Courtroom, the Classroom, and Canadian Legal Literature","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory law; Legal writing; Political science; Legal research; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010599834158756457,"score_gpt":0.28274535101202625,"score_spread":0.27214551685326976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1247556158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48129895,0.0008828829,0.0000090522035,0.06988512,0.000096928554,0.00021514986,0.0000053896765,0.000015464886,0.44759107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947227,0.00017155179,0.000018890049,0.0035200915,0.00008066802,0.000006285213,0.0000016608619,0.0000018587617,0.006726741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999318,0.00018367475,0.00007400164,0.00008884435,0.00015161566,0.0001838447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999681,0.00014300253,0.00001012796,0.00008448274,0.00002083974,0.000060524762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064490596,0.000044471457,0.000039803683,0.000024494811,0.0003579106,0.000314847,0.00017749441,0.000041570867,0.00040505512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048212023,0.000023710443,0.000016802394,0.00015574397,0.00015439666,0.0002781235,0.000004013938,0.00015042136,0.00002192481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295936,0.000022620756,0.005072897,0.00001162353,0.0000076150127,0.00006418896,0.28935266,0.000026230291,0.000010040238,0.4986215,0.06829169,0.138466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041412994,0.000016205977,0.016489776,0.000024396842,0.000004546816,0.0000041207027,0.014176564,0.00012545039,8.026665e-7,0.0015546622,0.96751,0.00005205125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47632474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9404261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8992183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005557557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018005578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12510238","doi":"10.29173/alr328","title":"Come on Mann Don’t Search Me! A Case Comment on R. v. C.J.F.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Supreme court; Law; Power (physics); Warrant; Political science; State (computer science); Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Search and seizure; Probable cause; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07560001743052239,"score_gpt":0.39294247898300194,"score_spread":0.3173424615524796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12510238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005720172,0.016551249,0.0000022467332,0.4833188,0.00020022232,0.0010225613,0.000003981418,0.000045445115,0.49313533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8145496,0.028368413,0.000033549393,0.15237498,0.00017836153,0.000026766695,0.000006456611,0.000011171308,0.0044507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981862,0.00039059247,0.00025769466,0.0002907123,0.00047091048,0.0004039365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861073,0.0006395753,0.00005718612,0.00041484987,0.000053525575,0.00022410373],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009705412,0.00015362866,0.00032062072,0.00001983452,0.0005912087,0.00006954992,0.000315296,0.000056215507,0.0008800037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017377635,0.0001232188,0.00013695082,0.00021057762,0.0001444192,0.00012714921,0.000029565423,0.00019931754,0.0013045598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013577157,0.00014240557,0.000018139532,0.0002467637,0.0000080985465,0.00026551017,0.0007705325,9.582529e-7,0.0000014116627,0.91294944,0.06728416,0.018298997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008909166,0.00026560886,0.000025188192,0.0025317355,0.000044894718,0.000047756836,0.000104905725,0.000001927018,0.00001408132,0.00047213573,0.9962445,0.00015817759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058374498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026435524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042246294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13019373","doi":"","title":"Seeking Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada for Personal Injury Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Court of record; Law of the case; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02175163728687978,"score_gpt":0.3083399092966655,"score_spread":0.2865882720097857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13019373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8407214,0.00095391716,0.0044899,0.15133004,0.00043755196,0.00048348913,0.000020653832,0.000014822846,0.0015482099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963178,0.000111699264,0.00004798081,0.0012906257,0.000726488,0.0000019036545,4.3032205e-7,0.0000056790277,0.0014974017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975771,0.00007375329,0.00018386664,0.00012523273,0.0004934175,0.0015466473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993823,0.00014513069,0.000075767144,0.000066544766,0.00016209793,0.00016816144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002110744,0.000085732005,0.00013180455,0.00003952309,0.0008129913,0.000050630446,0.00033419748,0.00003125101,0.000021255448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039005995,0.000065777196,0.00007653791,0.00017361033,0.000036578826,0.00009592933,0.000015579732,0.00040729292,0.0000025003212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017586298,0.00017054792,0.0019918699,0.000028953267,0.00022564421,0.000037772606,0.07859614,0.00025394247,0.004315831,0.4977741,0.16584478,0.2490018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005773904,0.0044817105,0.0030435808,0.0002245527,0.0001632298,0.0004775291,0.20875773,0.00020668985,0.0008523387,0.061233338,0.7192116,0.00077033136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2106721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94752705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7368549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011911818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007952216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W133698474","doi":"","title":"S. Guillermard, M. Saint-Hilaire. \"1982-2001 Vingt ans de grands arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada, 45 décisions choisies, présentées et commentées\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016724723633538604,"score_gpt":0.2798264635686768,"score_spread":0.2631017399351382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W133698474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81999254,0.006618446,0.0006846602,0.097247645,0.0021552863,0.00060753006,0.00036006857,0.00013405857,0.07219976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673779,0.008474559,0.0016138244,0.0045244223,0.0009644279,0.000054815508,0.00003915869,0.00007505963,0.016875802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941204,0.0017899985,0.0006946591,0.00065840944,0.00070370606,0.0020327992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958647,0.0018504102,0.00028301746,0.0006451889,0.00018868007,0.001167998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039278516,0.00040889127,0.0006638865,0.0001093773,0.0012037981,0.00029620377,0.0009314867,0.00048501987,0.001071703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002164819,0.000590291,0.0003353134,0.000683785,0.00086472614,0.0004208083,0.00012949448,0.0008015349,0.00007603986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008091227,0.0006077061,0.1931251,0.00048063372,0.00017603474,0.0015814858,0.017348718,0.0011742722,0.0002614834,0.27236846,0.5094854,0.003309749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007497758,0.00011415888,0.030315075,0.0008723994,0.00026395844,0.0007537163,0.0040857466,0.00070311344,0.00017813423,0.024625493,0.9365285,0.00080993766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8107015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8787087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42704305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043671452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004452518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134739315","doi":"","title":"H. Reid, J. Reid, C. Carrier. \"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Complément, jurisprudence et doctine\".","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Code (set theory); Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.03697541903515466,"score_gpt":0.288761886995865,"score_spread":0.25178646796071036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134739315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3986032,0.036463223,0.0010777332,0.25421804,0.0023128348,0.0013189039,0.00031469544,0.00047419686,0.30521718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903428,0.008740463,0.0009496537,0.0023133,0.001976983,0.00009449768,0.000011416737,0.000067072906,0.082418576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570495,0.00059176324,0.0006796583,0.0008692659,0.0006245984,0.0015297793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741536,0.0005297443,0.00037993243,0.00071629166,0.00021725666,0.00074139773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015003651,0.00037502736,0.0006085205,0.00009271249,0.0009015106,0.00028762582,0.0010987583,0.00044215284,0.004493809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068886054,0.000563416,0.00035830977,0.0007677416,0.00094313995,0.0008457496,0.00020198117,0.00081522093,0.0014548159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013822393,0.0010209645,0.08107729,0.0021196974,0.00018735814,0.0016023564,0.07361238,0.0010474651,0.0010490807,0.34647608,0.469827,0.021842113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048064877,0.00024992073,0.0042846794,0.0014606122,0.00027289175,0.0006086023,0.0024028549,0.0037323616,0.00030141693,0.009449119,0.97583836,0.0009185468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07042859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14552519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50601137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017317515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073425035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135945905","doi":"","title":"Hubert Reid, Claire Carrier. \"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et doctrine\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Philosophy; Code (set theory); Law; Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Theology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.020063749984128253,"score_gpt":0.28578172931701895,"score_spread":0.2657179793328907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135945905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42308846,0.023248205,0.0009063515,0.12667225,0.0020930932,0.0010853271,0.0001433857,0.0003371957,0.42242575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91517913,0.004623326,0.0009298137,0.0016507487,0.0013824673,0.00008932193,0.0000075561916,0.00005806788,0.07607955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594903,0.00073367165,0.0005720854,0.0007840674,0.00052913884,0.0014319933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977316,0.00045637446,0.00026826214,0.0006251122,0.00021403309,0.00070459757],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019942024,0.0003362758,0.0005408445,0.00007966653,0.0007656983,0.00022399727,0.00081948034,0.00050462224,0.0019474557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012105802,0.0005014008,0.000346333,0.0007815093,0.00083237345,0.00076592586,0.00009503619,0.00076019263,0.0005855021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078880126,0.00036026328,0.06665156,0.0011569469,0.00008573821,0.00090213935,0.025566151,0.00048022563,0.0004664464,0.7863385,0.10808423,0.009828918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031878214,0.00016442791,0.0031685825,0.0010073548,0.00020629478,0.00057162734,0.001926086,0.00029892926,0.0007903832,0.021779355,0.9690478,0.00072037993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067307085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22016366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001689282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003113344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142688777","doi":"10.21991/c9gw9p","title":"MEANING FROM CHAOS: REFLECTIONS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 — TWO YEARS AFTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10606902206255776,"score_gpt":0.3520335818041039,"score_spread":0.24596455974154613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142688777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0447295,0.00042412526,0.017021492,0.0043577985,0.004618044,0.0006574815,0.00036572362,0.000471074,0.92735475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927526,0.00006389893,0.0026535594,0.0020809066,0.0005109845,0.00013631498,0.000053404492,0.000014263078,0.0017340595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697524,0.0001543257,0.0004862842,0.0006539378,0.0007253494,0.001004846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984979,0.00022684284,0.00015738764,0.00040746745,0.00027653723,0.0004338424],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048872054,0.00031822876,0.00030845875,0.00022850365,0.002073745,0.00013626584,0.00042780797,0.00022747432,0.005509755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040428858,0.00033783502,0.00026972964,0.00045198426,0.005669324,0.0009791764,0.00013139435,0.0003430175,0.0022800667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012451729,0.00014681034,0.016088814,0.0000031934471,0.000052654446,0.00009412372,0.0015340608,0.00007222153,0.000063669686,0.968213,0.013146917,0.00046001247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009657099,0.0000767412,0.0032441411,0.0003308675,0.00012954973,0.000053929118,0.00844577,0.00004915835,0.00020262819,0.06963035,0.91614777,0.0007233718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008482012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034266915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042407322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013561194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W144961966","doi":"","title":"Product Liability in Canada: Principles and Practice North of the Border","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"William Mitchell law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Liability; Product (mathematics); Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03810034289567787,"score_gpt":0.3242205281595999,"score_spread":0.286120185263922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W144961966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45853975,0.22694945,3.79862e-7,0.073396735,0.00023617788,0.0021808685,0.000018191951,0.000021613858,0.23865682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88879395,0.10592848,0.00014352778,0.003028718,0.000059504768,0.00002294104,8.8627024e-7,0.0000067373967,0.0020152705],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983588,0.0004955864,0.00033731156,0.00023269991,0.00036224464,0.00021336776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899626,0.0003619455,0.0001233976,0.00034588197,0.000103873186,0.000068649315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013966588,0.000092539085,0.00025507002,0.0000041524363,0.00016096588,0.000013024346,0.00027043314,0.000021000687,0.00034532513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014293303,0.000063202664,0.000043127126,0.000319514,0.0003046567,0.00021151207,0.000038666753,0.00013216685,0.00000722905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001285961,0.0006234338,0.40523192,0.016793296,0.000069599555,0.000037358404,0.008583263,0.00007756946,0.00003718659,0.120365605,0.016436053,0.43161613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030306883,0.0000051728994,0.0470164,0.0008808204,0.00003986213,0.0000019616132,0.000073236035,5.0592286e-7,0.000015612108,0.00005737634,0.9518016,0.00007715233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9301429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99436146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93536556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015238184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010089284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3781068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145459232","doi":"","title":"Notions juridiques applicables aux procédures de règlement amiable des litiges au Canada.","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.032002879601724765,"score_gpt":0.2932857415127895,"score_spread":0.26128286191106476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145459232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80706465,0.007895846,0.0013905772,0.04976749,0.0005893065,0.00060854,0.00011132501,0.00013495318,0.13243729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93351,0.006591072,0.0018590797,0.00052957924,0.0018261572,0.00015216431,0.000015820326,0.000032485274,0.055483643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716276,0.00019064937,0.0003994269,0.0004484122,0.00038084728,0.0014178837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985609,0.00026438275,0.00014211443,0.0003219224,0.00018895176,0.0005217452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074897334,0.00021452342,0.00033814492,0.000055917546,0.0012860901,0.0001615296,0.0005212135,0.00019775133,0.00068991963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027293953,0.0003209343,0.00013415521,0.0005274153,0.00068824366,0.0004026066,0.00008564063,0.00026976346,0.00008130857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056597117,0.00053332344,0.098308474,0.0018111829,0.00013190745,0.0005188738,0.016064603,0.0016607993,0.0007818204,0.77336264,0.07069802,0.036071774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014165929,0.00009934265,0.014911526,0.001013404,0.00016911604,0.00012608654,0.0047437767,0.00028865613,0.0008964656,0.0866685,0.89042777,0.0005136703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9242842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81972975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003654209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057180156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146111080","doi":"10.29173/alr149","title":"Seeking More Than Truth: A Rationalization of the Principled Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatoon Medical Imaging","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Deliberation; Law; Rationalization (economics); Supreme court; Epistemology; Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07719237449317133,"score_gpt":0.33975647246347374,"score_spread":0.2625640979703024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146111080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19661283,0.0456249,0.0021391562,0.2425901,0.0029683458,0.008824134,0.000016565396,0.00012071655,0.5011032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341387,0.0023096371,0.00007024009,0.002657669,0.000100071535,0.00004696108,0.0000028764669,0.0000062091513,0.0013924822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989324,0.0002867175,0.00022119272,0.00012896222,0.00029976983,0.0001309559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925524,0.00020938659,0.000121670084,0.00027271907,0.000097895274,0.000043106495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008046014,0.000066286906,0.00013183564,0.00000699994,0.00037998773,0.000019470266,0.00033635524,0.000028813505,0.00043230905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000670986,0.00003706816,0.000095033574,0.00028246501,0.00013170215,0.00014987182,0.000056646877,0.00004845159,0.00007675091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005753746,0.000027072674,0.0016981165,0.00031613934,0.00000937003,1.5063587e-7,0.012334015,0.0000024796518,0.000044114215,0.9816285,0.0013193043,0.0026150162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049594386,0.000019937575,0.01436378,0.0026074632,0.000101811194,0.0000019993136,0.00023823229,0.00001362509,0.0001216023,0.0021546714,0.9802105,0.00011682247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02433073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045822963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97947377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002919454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006302755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98216635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480030692","doi":"10.29173/alr148","title":"Auto Insurance as Social Contract: Solving Automobile Insurance Coverage Disputes Through a Public Regulatory Framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Statute; Insurance policy; Automobile insurance; Business; Actuarial science; Key person insurance; Insurance law; Accident (philosophy); Social insurance; Casualty insurance; Auto insurance risk selection; Product (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Property insurance; General insurance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05878912696404826,"score_gpt":0.3310163964461471,"score_spread":0.27222726948209885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480030692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09641898,0.18683587,0.0002536223,0.026400186,0.0018894606,0.0024213942,0.000039490547,0.00046497813,0.68527603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95127046,0.036747295,0.00034611905,0.009982674,0.0003822827,0.00015426855,0.000006287116,0.00003505198,0.001075558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968372,0.0004795191,0.000629973,0.0005766535,0.0006715523,0.00080508884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976394,0.0009958714,0.0003840651,0.0005400947,0.0002095402,0.00023098757],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011055142,0.0003179266,0.0007214013,0.000019643296,0.0013792256,0.00018076469,0.0008507573,0.00026390923,0.0022381828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018943929,0.00029490146,0.0003202281,0.0005201304,0.0008406166,0.0017456706,0.0001191084,0.00043481778,0.000689446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010787699,0.0001158305,0.0056087477,0.00065281923,0.000035272595,0.000015765267,0.008775571,5.3236516e-8,0.0000057723664,0.97004104,0.002936252,0.0118021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014122557,0.00004637283,0.022782994,0.0034959782,0.00007167083,0.000009529504,0.00010346453,0.0000012758296,0.000021802929,0.025474895,0.94736993,0.00048083375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050940078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01844204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94456613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013276513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033270632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480715691","doi":"","title":"L’Abus De Droit: L’Anténorme - Partie 1 (Abuse of Right: The Antenorm - Part I)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.024856803032552315,"score_gpt":0.2922822322337357,"score_spread":0.26742542920118334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480715691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75741434,0.17591853,0.0012879454,0.031486787,0.0039149043,0.00029064913,0.000011641443,0.00003410394,0.029641096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911998,0.06849325,0.000024577244,0.00023474598,0.0029909583,0.000005570911,8.3570217e-7,0.000022877422,0.016229186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922903,0.0005391184,0.00057975453,0.00018591419,0.00070289377,0.0057020234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840164,0.0003043024,0.0004664135,0.00028450563,0.00015766309,0.0003854721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008637119,0.00023786834,0.00033286904,0.000058012592,0.0010948161,0.00008973051,0.0008258353,0.00019897654,0.0005900207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000196959,0.00017950946,0.00032650173,0.0004596405,0.0010416948,0.0010323137,0.0000455674,0.0022062557,0.00021040654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006438771,0.00033347195,0.006183447,0.00002384024,0.00017943032,0.000005445118,0.012769199,0.000012669067,0.00010370049,0.96403337,0.003207808,0.0130832065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039869704,0.0004286368,0.0016921489,0.0002557545,0.0005031621,0.0012399512,0.02568549,0.000056662266,0.00039032867,0.39148745,0.57746124,0.00040045904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018148076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008654702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57425344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017160323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028473458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481177748","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1253","title":"The Brilliant Career of Section 7 of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Criminal code; Mens rea; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06900587580948803,"score_gpt":0.3334691613772605,"score_spread":0.2644632855677725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481177748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048449803,0.70729244,0.00004350907,0.08123551,0.0058644903,0.0023395855,0.000026482678,0.00005455852,0.15469365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616934,0.036811892,0.000007900154,0.00058624573,0.00027416894,0.000009769791,3.6223324e-7,0.000004058998,0.00061219366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989262,0.00023601894,0.00021768603,0.00006421535,0.00036251382,0.00019333903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992975,0.00011116079,0.00013274349,0.00026640794,0.00014750502,0.00004468211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001591629,0.00005482391,0.00015372619,0.0000033681256,0.00030507994,0.000009797429,0.00028416503,0.000030698862,0.00014286835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013715995,0.000028061557,0.0001377204,0.00013444989,0.00034775693,0.00018595422,0.000040512892,0.00006770659,0.00001795577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010683705,0.000071666975,0.010059507,0.002386964,0.000044138917,2.580688e-7,0.0048782253,4.701623e-7,0.0005818687,0.8951866,0.06589213,0.02088746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016999338,0.000008050163,0.002620179,0.0010228336,0.00006152557,0.0000010683335,0.00015701263,2.9862872e-7,0.00018167551,0.00017640644,0.9957149,0.0000390393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024548466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024278203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025566465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045267585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37110102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481710317","doi":"","title":"Should Canada Enact a New Sui Generis Database Right","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Political science; Right to be forgotten; History; Law; Computer science; Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.12427711234083327,"score_gpt":0.3202032427479464,"score_spread":0.19592613040711315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481710317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056924555,0.0013060827,0.00039106523,0.07930797,0.0008930325,0.00020283405,0.00002558537,0.00013331375,0.8608156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8401531,0.00024091911,0.00063005084,0.0026281755,0.00050356885,0.0000022069198,0.000003430743,0.0000057623843,0.15583281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990091,0.000040541596,0.00009834733,0.00016400879,0.00039436223,0.00029367968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994046,0.00008190492,0.000021569727,0.00017666072,0.000025732845,0.00028951777],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014528053,0.000067957626,0.00008080762,0.000014254164,0.00031921704,0.000057131856,0.00024557818,0.00003248419,0.023191959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110693276,0.000055724908,0.000026611538,0.00014327033,0.000057300826,0.00022655104,0.000030938092,0.00006809501,0.00014539053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015396714,0.000009956207,0.00040428774,0.0000024546528,0.000003243294,0.00004351096,0.0008194582,0.000001271928,0.00006340577,0.014434795,0.97837865,0.0058374014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043890228,0.0000064455835,0.00009788641,0.00000587309,0.000008381172,0.0000014077721,0.00066546444,0.0000644617,0.00035794597,0.00009607638,0.9985505,0.00010168648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99415314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7832285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012716347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041891972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97770095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483860873","doi":"","title":"International human rights and Canadian law: legal commitment, implementation and the charter.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Political science; Charter; Ex post facto law; Fundamental rights; International law; Linguistic rights; Reservation of rights; Right to property; Sources of law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.052001202150730286,"score_gpt":0.32806683574568285,"score_spread":0.27606563359495256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483860873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028359339,0.00035257908,0.000016191645,0.0017319707,0.000244135,0.00091156625,0.000120502955,0.000041484265,0.9682222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31066725,0.0005371009,0.000056064804,0.00003608242,0.0002658771,2.7642253e-7,0.00009818027,0.00001641267,0.6883228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599934,0.0009904522,0.0002545398,0.0006441394,0.0013776548,0.0007338517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997247,0.00059784955,0.00025584287,0.0004352654,0.00079758954,0.00066646165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024659259,0.0002773222,0.0004410139,0.00077899074,0.0067161634,0.00024108635,0.0013652575,0.00040508635,0.00024805666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022235157,0.00030012825,0.00017773327,0.0002431771,0.0074588265,0.0007644815,0.0005797603,0.00092718744,0.00001982071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058862864,0.00005347069,0.00075220014,0.00010476142,0.00032205158,0.0011581731,0.011284811,6.4020986e-7,0.000048421185,0.95805407,0.026441935,0.0011908216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017011836,0.00013465037,0.00047931852,0.00016966199,0.00013704142,0.000023082439,0.02382132,0.000006375549,0.000025755227,0.0024391874,0.9707749,0.00028751275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85831124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8968614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020152505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010970128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484087257","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1110","title":"Twenty-Five Years in Search of a Reasonable Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Scope (computer science); Code (set theory); Criminal code; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Section (typography); Law and economics; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.08967049957305391,"score_gpt":0.35082779431135724,"score_spread":0.26115729473830335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484087257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123878404,0.28500947,0.000071181246,0.007639276,0.00026231256,0.0024280197,0.00002005277,0.00010330437,0.580588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85774547,0.13829389,0.0008788687,0.00052072486,0.00007768947,0.000033090313,0.0000055652295,0.000011162712,0.0024335543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831957,0.00030630853,0.00028216632,0.00021902788,0.00055161107,0.00032130352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993769,0.00009293708,0.000061406354,0.00024406216,0.00012346994,0.000101223726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016200662,0.000084002895,0.0003459364,0.000028831098,0.00014188519,0.000010253254,0.00035353735,0.00005468966,0.00028595267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000188504,0.00008075278,0.000103145634,0.00042317912,0.00042745387,0.00020123823,0.00006146085,0.00014662083,0.000085921965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049221326,0.00061071955,0.009991199,0.006924433,0.000042137228,0.00015580183,0.017612176,0.00002659702,0.000082245424,0.8988433,0.05428835,0.0113738505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014507493,0.000035343826,0.0019050579,0.0027364518,0.00003088903,0.000011533052,0.00058334053,0.00001342991,0.000021508378,0.0004504883,0.9938981,0.00016879162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019649835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017592035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93960977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007368842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002259749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485137107","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1220","title":"Tort Lite?: Vancouver (City) v. War and the Availability of Damages for Charter Infringements","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Damages; Law; Tort; Charter; Political science; Plaintiff; Liability","score_opus":0.08835699322221514,"score_gpt":0.33187557867192813,"score_spread":0.243518585449713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485137107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065486416,0.33597356,0.00059618417,0.01585074,0.002872477,0.013162848,0.000114964605,0.0002277033,0.5657151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016689,0.09185589,0.00080820505,0.0024730572,0.00018108693,0.00020750484,0.0000026583907,0.000015873291,0.002786812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988293,0.00018273042,0.0003259538,0.00020225847,0.00024810774,0.00021164816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907464,0.0001939124,0.00013003669,0.00031799002,0.00021241399,0.00007101308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002488153,0.000101814294,0.00032404286,0.000009818438,0.0002471367,0.000015804279,0.0003034875,0.00003961124,0.00068754127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039438426,0.00006627002,0.00012322444,0.00009228438,0.00075437676,0.00028952988,0.00007804629,0.00006284992,0.000011081834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002983926,0.00030110092,0.015161613,0.012681171,0.00017057885,0.0000031744057,0.018659137,5.3404424e-8,0.000045457567,0.80913234,0.11936982,0.024177168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002292607,0.000038148515,0.0007857147,0.00096073886,0.00014467121,2.1361903e-7,0.00017865065,0.0000011275949,0.000059414855,0.0047201626,0.9927853,0.000096598465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002529125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006710092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87341547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022167998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045369376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75280946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489276393","doi":"","title":"Restraint and Proliferation in Criminal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Fredericton","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Mandate; Constitution; Politics; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01680214579787631,"score_gpt":0.313583114705148,"score_spread":0.2967809689072717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489276393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98122627,0.00027530632,0.00010835853,0.008108139,0.00017408165,0.000081119935,1.8834278e-7,0.000012258087,0.01001428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998159,0.00078564667,0.000091480484,0.000116314084,0.00041630794,0.000002627412,2.705763e-7,0.0000043150526,0.0004240627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984567,0.000083249186,0.00013528406,0.00010602696,0.00020483503,0.0010138596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997371,0.000041102874,0.000044931472,0.000051913958,0.00004468312,0.00008029132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026268028,0.000056412267,0.000070039845,0.000042265667,0.00041340475,0.000114729024,0.00012004407,0.00006564373,0.000029872763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015217921,0.000051721796,0.000022496744,0.00007208518,0.0001893436,0.00031754855,0.000011397243,0.0013842891,0.0000070296082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001854503,0.000015539246,0.0014998353,0.0000019497325,0.0000024239991,0.0000038603284,0.0023942161,7.031852e-7,0.0007424291,0.9864932,0.000013203989,0.008814134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038596196,0.00023151125,0.006203189,0.000026741069,0.000023857918,0.00035997585,0.018728178,0.00002959562,0.00014699226,0.94492114,0.028748952,0.00019392275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002972122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36215612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.359184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018606459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012193633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64948285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491919779","doi":"10.21991/c96m35","title":"Administrative Law, Judicial Deference, and the Charter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Charter; Political science; Judicial review; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.03788362426289593,"score_gpt":0.31262739621202357,"score_spread":0.27474377194912764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491919779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006334362,0.00068406074,0.043937124,0.07716242,0.0019126207,0.00085191365,0.0000887745,0.00018518596,0.86884356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945851,0.000092183225,0.00028051727,0.0040631145,0.00040951688,0.00008120641,0.000017980612,0.000004633669,0.00046573783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978002,0.00027898158,0.00037103434,0.00039660014,0.00053825893,0.0006149281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998371,0.00075079844,0.0001356185,0.00023337096,0.00025957962,0.0002496319],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011064722,0.00022515356,0.00029800017,0.00006480346,0.004415932,0.00025171373,0.0003546075,0.00015734293,0.00023788291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009155549,0.00016909075,0.00014562951,0.0002052525,0.032301646,0.00062242587,0.00011789393,0.0002598713,0.00019379056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012230838,0.000028671886,0.0015885634,0.0000058963565,0.000025207584,0.000003806547,0.0005665315,0.000009595513,0.000010132827,0.9934823,0.003102829,0.0010541355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013833714,0.000049606573,0.0002673645,0.000086314845,0.000067763445,0.000064701344,0.004293616,0.00016489087,0.00003541523,0.260438,0.73286045,0.00028854725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014014994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059987972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98825073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008679122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009535968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492717687","doi":"","title":"Ancillary Issues with Oakes: The Development of the Waterfield Test and the Problem of Fundamental Constitutional Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Balancing test; Separation of powers; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Politics; History","score_opus":0.010293016586053222,"score_gpt":0.25095058875903986,"score_spread":0.24065757217298664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492717687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96202856,0.005375234,0.00044202933,0.021977335,0.00006368406,0.0005135066,0.000001447468,0.0000069763614,0.009591212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977574,0.00080013403,0.00016280326,0.000089545414,0.00006717356,0.000009493092,1.4951651e-7,0.0000024881479,0.0011108114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986621,0.0001926135,0.00020204407,0.00007031856,0.00036407608,0.00050881866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.00034098845,0.00014978592,0.00007839694,0.00010731368,0.000026478749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029559887,0.00006849353,0.00010029368,0.00001203909,0.0008711063,0.0000481394,0.0003182248,0.000027775595,0.00007045055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000687825,0.000025330184,0.000038843362,0.00008375345,0.0024168794,0.0001361034,0.0000445623,0.00040273395,0.0000029756093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055903314,0.000027877648,0.010696979,0.000008044076,0.0000622482,1.2252733e-7,0.013328559,0.0000037928382,0.00023858559,0.9702878,0.00008713548,0.005202955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013303971,0.00034597272,0.015810147,0.00040031798,0.00012887322,0.00025187884,0.21622154,0.000008750915,0.0021489472,0.7263058,0.036800765,0.0002466499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053422374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004887595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24398203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011443033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022517347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8905093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493063613","doi":"10.3968/4433","title":"The Roles of Local Rules of Criminal Procedure in the Process of Rule by Law in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal procedure; Law; China; Local government; Process (computing); Unitary state; Rule of law; Criminal justice; Political science; Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.011871828096083703,"score_gpt":0.2953846283039714,"score_spread":0.28351280020788766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493063613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065544,0.00015890466,0.000009216182,0.0029094745,0.00004720721,0.00016820441,0.000014543272,0.0000026490468,0.0901354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997833,0.000012475305,0.000007810868,0.00012342402,0.00003882768,0.000008574143,4.7851825e-7,0.0000025015966,0.00002263565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845153,0.00014437552,0.00023283131,0.00015813635,0.0006018825,0.00041122708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993914,0.00014526267,0.00012235448,0.000106199615,0.00012850367,0.00010632751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027672786,0.00006550398,0.0001440123,0.00006372869,0.0007252703,0.000039706883,0.0011134305,0.00005870659,0.00000816529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042606823,0.00004509292,0.000033240984,0.00073749566,0.0052816444,0.00020945429,0.000020890591,0.000116708725,9.12928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014496666,0.00003968942,0.009162365,0.000074413925,0.0000012413417,0.000001141448,0.11525559,0.0000063740945,0.000391527,0.86115134,0.00033106585,0.013570763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004792235,0.00023553644,0.16247007,0.00040980312,0.000039288294,0.0000026887762,0.7252595,0.00025755918,0.0066054845,0.060804512,0.042913407,0.00052295724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26728213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8365311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80034685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012962082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011166184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493358019","doi":"","title":"Patrick Brode — Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01702309638900065,"score_gpt":0.26846114672662685,"score_spread":0.25143805033762623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493358019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8281689,0.0014513949,0.000012484519,0.02395629,0.0009262712,0.00025095308,0.00001023035,0.000070876486,0.14515258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976728,0.0001025703,0.000060381237,0.00034144984,0.00020785932,0.000006417239,0.000002993099,0.0000061687338,0.0015993596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922603,0.000047494414,0.00010263997,0.00015028747,0.00015747483,0.00031605273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965733,0.000021584867,0.000031493822,0.0000590736,0.000045072014,0.00018545239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002819861,0.000060963925,0.00009790881,0.00005903578,0.0011379756,0.00004104471,0.000074103635,0.000097364864,0.000050810726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000737119,0.00007274274,0.000026451986,0.00021128496,0.00046691785,0.00020204569,0.000007512423,0.000095989366,0.000022668553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022679778,0.00007690588,0.00814791,0.000023695677,0.000008681881,0.00006563896,0.06290858,0.000024148718,0.00020077932,0.90351474,0.00517546,0.019830761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005460888,0.000025556363,0.010389808,0.00003842842,0.00002181002,0.0000035820103,0.0075808493,0.0000022727975,0.000024662908,0.017547196,0.9635823,0.00023748609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012257174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008222324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87525034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495252859","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2230369","title":"The Governance of Privacy Through Codes of Conduct: International Lessons for U.S. Privacy Policy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Business; Privacy by Design; Corporate governance; Information privacy law; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.06827569980196792,"score_gpt":0.404770199794318,"score_spread":0.3364944999923501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495252859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68348044,0.028545087,0.010759588,0.25355747,0.0022244775,0.0007612698,0.0000703487,0.000036857335,0.020564483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786764,0.018428186,0.0002829223,0.000051424915,0.00092854036,0.000005977412,8.879661e-7,0.000008179761,0.0016175194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781865,0.00009331055,0.0003012386,0.000084657295,0.00043159933,0.0012705678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876624,0.0003764209,0.000430938,0.00013348524,0.00023572224,0.000057179495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00254324,0.00008152581,0.00015087663,0.000021668262,0.0004890005,0.000036355672,0.00078073295,0.00004956098,0.000020000962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014442881,0.000058838847,0.00013852816,0.00014018164,0.0003476253,0.00057561684,0.00006113963,0.00038692422,0.000002658397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052489013,0.000050547147,0.0012607814,0.0000059637623,0.00006336111,5.0107563e-8,0.005693645,0.0000017932573,0.0005056351,0.9809875,0.0005431363,0.010835117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037298133,0.00012859196,0.0028350193,0.000051397063,0.00004039653,0.000027185815,0.008631991,0.000004792867,0.0016381977,0.46034506,0.5258104,0.00011398526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002035208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015838282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5252673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005746496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027083417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4804482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495532371","doi":"10.5040/9781472561091","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07231684435059137,"score_gpt":0.30147326334268726,"score_spread":0.22915641899209588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495532371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024497858,0.0038518338,0.00008653983,0.0016279407,0.003472181,0.00058959855,0.000043272677,0.00052437244,0.9895593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.088074595,0.00009516646,0.00063449953,0.004391002,0.008680485,0.00005457058,0.000097117554,0.00015425363,0.8978183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931669,0.00083744567,0.00085767277,0.0010257119,0.002353795,0.0017584623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542826,0.0013714128,0.0007220892,0.001104473,0.00054073386,0.0008330066],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009574037,0.0007481259,0.0008566669,0.0003200413,0.002571238,0.0054694973,0.0026949884,0.0018254183,0.002475217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016441053,0.00077443843,0.00056351954,0.0001064788,0.001895698,0.0018569356,0.00065545645,0.002802352,0.00029802104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038735336,0.000016672935,0.000014876321,0.00014307498,0.000073077994,0.00006692483,0.025523176,3.1812945e-7,0.000009193727,0.8076117,0.15612362,0.010378634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012779758,0.000028868171,0.000010208769,0.0005825452,0.00039727218,0.000018057566,0.0009993748,2.998477e-7,0.000015231907,0.38328227,0.6139376,0.0006004575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005031822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062101586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.457814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008519281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021939492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496033635","doi":"","title":"More than Words: Enhancing the Proposed Canadian Victims Bill of Rights (Bill C-32)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; Business; Human rights","score_opus":0.01619554934653395,"score_gpt":0.2715232000048499,"score_spread":0.255327650658316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496033635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.766969,0.0003554518,0.00011546258,0.030610532,0.0013654036,0.0009551487,0.000024360106,0.00016192286,0.19944267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953839,0.00001697396,0.0002345838,0.0009516763,0.0005678103,0.000014864821,0.0000034192087,0.000015537878,0.002811237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978306,0.00030526845,0.00032660112,0.00033059047,0.0005690882,0.00063780096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839187,0.0002828599,0.00013693578,0.0004995058,0.00017340806,0.00051542715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014103012,0.00017271707,0.00025051733,0.00006305975,0.0013335403,0.0001482976,0.0007288956,0.0001410422,0.0005639193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004237618,0.00009543407,0.000121002646,0.00036311778,0.00062558154,0.0003619303,0.00005145689,0.00027407694,0.00025004457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010824773,0.00016495265,0.0119656855,0.00012011491,0.00012202385,0.000048297563,0.06478538,0.00010788511,0.005061443,0.89078945,0.022076096,0.004650406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023453466,0.00009932422,0.002742161,0.00021432088,0.00005371709,0.0000031894444,0.005271454,0.000037539307,0.007409303,0.026613135,0.9569582,0.0003631386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94217443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019670946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046926408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497276413","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1171","title":"Sniffing Out the Ancillary Powers Implications of the Dog Sniff Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Search and seizure; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0795397052487384,"score_gpt":0.3767873164550151,"score_spread":0.29724761120627674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497276413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010485769,0.2566505,0.000044533088,0.48207504,0.0006522422,0.0019861136,0.00003652503,0.00010524226,0.24796402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94906396,0.04096401,0.00004300305,0.009235074,0.00012501738,0.0000143221905,0.0000015649434,0.0000053193658,0.0005477297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986634,0.00024721536,0.00030062324,0.000166565,0.00036983736,0.00025231764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987716,0.00027789615,0.00015624755,0.00054442516,0.00018361978,0.00006617763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011261236,0.00010148351,0.00021750246,0.0000075330704,0.0007673865,0.00004026892,0.0007056107,0.00004010813,0.0001974942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058007514,0.000056864672,0.00020209987,0.00025685714,0.00038908908,0.00015405612,0.000052045256,0.0001244119,0.000039459333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003409111,0.00006383296,0.0009806302,0.00040388192,0.000019080037,0.0000038688036,0.0019678124,0.0000019282186,0.00030622256,0.8928036,0.08041096,0.023034787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027036891,0.00001978122,0.005273365,0.0012757622,0.00010190721,0.000009272762,0.0002156277,4.4021678e-7,0.00003752079,0.003432186,0.98951423,0.000092854396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013980608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037151477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005433253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016931324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59021944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497282126","doi":"","title":"When Rights Become Empty Promises: Promoting an Exclusionary Rule that Vindicates Personal Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Rule of law; Appeal; Search and seizure; Status quo; Convict; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.03988807206243631,"score_gpt":0.2954435197896745,"score_spread":0.25555544772723815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497282126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564106,0.0012248342,0.00012943945,0.0017823428,0.00030532308,0.00028049143,0.000002400288,0.0001009564,0.010533168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99525344,0.00032466764,0.00038444085,0.00005660332,0.0007844008,0.000011427413,0.0000041110666,0.00001927935,0.0031616385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954126,0.0004025344,0.0003183752,0.0003931034,0.00081624644,0.002657134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894774,0.00007678346,0.00028060708,0.00017302141,0.00012913787,0.0003926962],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485705,0.00023144869,0.00025148693,0.00013310718,0.0032608076,0.00016182456,0.0008317126,0.00015709082,0.0013220087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005718112,0.0001790054,0.00017077732,0.00015040526,0.0003307088,0.0014427294,0.00008525443,0.001409723,0.000120634206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056827074,0.0016220274,0.03647027,0.00005432849,0.00040798934,0.00023005845,0.41916913,5.972135e-7,0.0009639207,0.51721096,0.00081556145,0.022486892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040882482,0.0005697376,0.0051489044,0.00010456417,0.00008487453,0.0003745703,0.013666312,0.000028926854,0.0004852837,0.96548116,0.013217454,0.0004294138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007998903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037369072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4482702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089381536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021380333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499267772","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1200","title":"Charter Detention and the Exclusion of Evidence after Grant, Harrison and Suberu","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Section (typography); Misconduct; Right to counsel; Political science; Habeas corpus; Meaning (existential); Reasonable suspicion; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07520492235012231,"score_gpt":0.3524689362978585,"score_spread":0.2772640139477362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499267772","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44074386,0.47703907,0.00008150223,0.074897826,0.000726193,0.0019535352,0.000008335022,0.000051395145,0.00449828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8394689,0.15936336,0.00007016959,0.0007886008,0.00008080473,0.000030755727,4.6533617e-7,0.0000046244986,0.00019231677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882406,0.00025043235,0.00024356114,0.0001965453,0.00031912656,0.00016626834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991929,0.0002682232,0.000102463586,0.00022732923,0.0001295188,0.000079581114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025319916,0.000093269955,0.0002543215,0.000011267482,0.00030046186,0.00005293655,0.00016560068,0.00005504449,0.0002905624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039588587,0.000052927637,0.00007616046,0.00009050074,0.00094428094,0.00037283145,0.00008422823,0.00014502552,0.000014383322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062716595,0.000138694,0.02795127,0.014801344,0.00006984541,0.00002443401,0.0134224985,6.878317e-8,0.008446385,0.6714958,0.008505618,0.25451687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034695095,0.000052177867,0.010022164,0.009006645,0.00031162542,0.000016158818,0.00014269276,0.000015282374,0.00016039262,0.0043779877,0.9753244,0.00022354058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023521043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008447712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96681875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000068966974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026989765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47140217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500562463","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1161","title":"R. v. Ferguson and the Search for a Coherent Approach to Mandatory Minimum Sentences under Section 12","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Charter; Law; Sentence; Context (archaeology); Punishment (psychology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13052636827675382,"score_gpt":0.3564753529031405,"score_spread":0.22594898462638666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500562463","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0879226,0.3971137,0.010583226,0.26994008,0.002870681,0.019818356,0.000058776328,0.00038611458,0.21130645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89091754,0.097045206,0.0005920258,0.005513105,0.00065752043,0.000489755,0.000009327039,0.000019725754,0.0047558136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842036,0.00034363812,0.00021973968,0.0002805442,0.0004355396,0.0003001939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992239,0.00025252425,0.000048759593,0.00019067262,0.0001433657,0.0001407874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019642261,0.000115971576,0.0002852411,0.000015963984,0.00097483356,0.00005730428,0.0002444193,0.000050815506,0.000056004275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009550426,0.00007577739,0.00011174895,0.00014279986,0.00047366397,0.00016355589,0.00005630537,0.00010737329,0.00001926799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034238587,0.00023736652,0.0008093163,0.004811444,0.00010811985,0.000004366884,0.012675835,0.000018468172,0.00007830595,0.77448845,0.19898538,0.0074405405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029475812,0.00005695958,0.00020262382,0.000735797,0.00008356103,0.000015277461,0.001205346,0.000032551863,0.000016318198,0.000583626,0.9966247,0.00014845794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004083822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029048603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8029949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009306582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011037778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.749773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503059967","doi":"10.29173/alr1328","title":"A Failed Experiment - Investigative Detention: Ten Years Later","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Parliament; Remand (court procedure); Immigration detention; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.05482765130025396,"score_gpt":0.34210789971130967,"score_spread":0.2872802484110557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503059967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033781074,0.10417655,0.0000075220573,0.021740181,0.0005487203,0.0013829654,0.0000015695148,0.00007037038,0.83829105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96627426,0.0152039975,0.0005003555,0.0070387255,0.000082032726,0.00012712878,0.000003829694,0.000014650658,0.010755027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874955,0.00033907162,0.00021096654,0.00021328166,0.00024401589,0.0002431389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940044,0.0001294411,0.000069694834,0.00020164628,0.000048183956,0.00015060327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005021944,0.00009818664,0.00021312796,0.0000094233155,0.00022130499,0.000050531147,0.00016818153,0.00004397556,0.0021098373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036395062,0.00008403245,0.00010457879,0.00017206598,0.0003227527,0.00023000393,0.00002214177,0.000069171954,0.000838257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001539304,0.000029198427,0.00044089547,0.00019785603,0.000019319532,0.000007651889,0.0025979273,9.6089536e-8,0.00005701109,0.98543704,0.009816676,0.0013948035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058104833,0.000018523118,0.0001839483,0.0010239711,0.00004658691,0.0000015674685,0.00015561264,1.3375062e-7,0.00024480463,0.0019283204,0.9962111,0.00012730515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010027394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012413158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98639446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051274073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007133599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504962747","doi":"10.37974/alf.144","title":"Four Decades of Cannabis Criminals in Canada: 1970-2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amsterdam Law Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Section (typography); Library science; Political science; Law; Media studies; Spring (device); Sociology; History; Engineering; Advertising","score_opus":0.03111809042252403,"score_gpt":0.296881531112344,"score_spread":0.26576344068981994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504962747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94360495,0.00007341883,0.0000062058125,0.020818062,0.0010878321,0.0001844164,0.000013183557,0.000018059962,0.034193862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997114,0.000016118138,0.00015928563,0.00087389874,0.00010103686,0.0000147742585,0.0000014240545,0.000010275206,0.0017091576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983947,0.00008755128,0.0003041325,0.0002148726,0.0004351164,0.00056357175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924195,0.00012576641,0.00010851532,0.00025507872,0.00009796972,0.00017069322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006111911,0.000117041185,0.00022809055,0.000045864315,0.0002299826,0.000034609366,0.00044495074,0.00009667819,0.0002609497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001749944,0.00011378575,0.00005926633,0.0001906311,0.0003443241,0.00027838527,0.00007702887,0.00024620196,0.000013561203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060742765,0.00009674769,0.18140513,0.0001060684,0.000023308168,0.00011766316,0.008745573,0.000010176209,0.0035289745,0.73884106,0.048503675,0.018560896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035801603,0.00008174653,0.07168636,0.00011944223,0.00003718407,0.000012771105,0.015721038,0.000018042801,0.007115417,0.009815863,0.89457774,0.00045640746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99695325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84607404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015647832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012106507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4640048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505333001","doi":"10.7202/043731ar","title":"JEAN CAROL BOUCHER, L'appel à la Cour du Québec d'une décision du Tribunal administratif du Québec, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2002, 191 p., ISBN 2-89451-558-8.","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015021711467490973,"score_gpt":0.24474355928380506,"score_spread":0.22972184781631408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505333001","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3546008,0.0389989,0.0056678113,0.5093206,0.0023415384,0.0011607163,0.000773119,0.0005050427,0.086631455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86266106,0.010110117,0.00040630536,0.0017466587,0.0018137672,0.000070780865,0.000049475144,0.00008622368,0.12305564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947528,0.00078427,0.00097134354,0.00093247154,0.0011470793,0.0014120066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955216,0.0020975485,0.00043752143,0.0006319242,0.00031548206,0.0009959146],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013732624,0.00067451753,0.0008040482,0.0001670587,0.0028267114,0.0004646429,0.0010195742,0.0010415353,0.012601218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001504095,0.00076522905,0.0006310266,0.00094846415,0.003976218,0.0007858978,0.00010027149,0.0013248202,0.0022891732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020422802,0.001160153,0.0033336142,0.0002345135,0.00019910703,0.0010114807,0.032355424,0.00034601754,0.00019193738,0.08067234,0.8478103,0.03248088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010188499,0.00040275953,0.00193682,0.0003635891,0.00044646498,0.0002731499,0.009382959,0.0028281778,0.00010922801,0.0016610525,0.98067254,0.0009044208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6726757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7874582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5080602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028977988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021352274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506611381","doi":"","title":"Section 38 and the open courts principle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Legislation; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Government (linguistics); Open government; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Transparency (behavior); Computer science","score_opus":0.020339244722176405,"score_gpt":0.34231363642640833,"score_spread":0.3219743917042319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506611381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7688727,0.0069833496,0.001632457,0.12731166,0.00059188355,0.0005837733,6.192324e-7,0.000043962093,0.093979605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368824,0.0065882346,0.000038669572,0.00019257555,0.001092142,0.000004248001,1.3699267e-7,0.0000046655196,0.0083911205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984534,0.00019543021,0.0001207359,0.00009707064,0.00022510633,0.00090826757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999654,0.0000829794,0.000078404555,0.00007114633,0.000050337654,0.00006316483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005183201,0.00005472052,0.000085966305,0.000018954353,0.001191846,0.00029265878,0.00036928992,0.000038026745,0.000076732096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012948523,0.000036123995,0.000036018384,0.00007064993,0.00019192389,0.0005294692,0.00006477875,0.00069318677,0.000015460984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008184194,0.000013102502,0.00043691808,7.07923e-7,0.000017666462,5.147829e-7,0.0022462185,0.000010582761,0.000013883607,0.9768614,0.00050912326,0.019808019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000768638,0.00007289402,0.00048730866,0.000012551944,0.000027726433,0.00017716103,0.008346435,0.000057394373,0.000015413514,0.24279837,0.7471426,0.00009346919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001619689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04302969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7466335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047102472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012205321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511740437","doi":"","title":"Unchecked Power: The Constitutional Regulation of Arrest Reconsidered","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Habeas corpus; Mandate; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.05803025011553795,"score_gpt":0.32200586881567245,"score_spread":0.2639756187001345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511740437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07008041,0.00010806542,0.0011068753,0.007921892,0.00046359847,0.00014375974,0.000001596753,0.00002645258,0.92014736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690944,0.000012395144,0.00040363614,0.00012985434,0.000023957895,0.0000019243998,5.2426446e-7,8.8453436e-7,0.0025173856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941134,0.00012348777,0.00011260224,0.00007073397,0.00018861312,0.00009319254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951744,0.00023098286,0.00004501152,0.00008959625,0.00008663999,0.000030354237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006437928,0.000031667852,0.000051188636,0.0000121876,0.0002787848,0.000017370141,0.000071223614,0.00003163242,0.0020753602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006771388,0.00002165989,0.000031400326,0.00010344284,0.00084177713,0.00010043835,0.0000050084864,0.000033580323,0.000037936465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003167039,0.000008180302,0.0012368482,0.000001065363,0.0000026856712,2.0525668e-7,0.0008644642,0.0000140988195,0.0002623443,0.992879,0.0046090507,0.00011889707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018667096,0.000025568159,0.011055781,0.000030309817,0.000019990399,0.0000046837845,0.010902734,0.000015233076,0.0029040799,0.13105704,0.8436664,0.00013155313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055266987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013226253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92682904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022108325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025449487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514322907","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1388602","title":"The Gap in Canadian Police Powers: Canada Needs 'Public Order Policing' Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Public order; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.017076246756477967,"score_gpt":0.2878400949397348,"score_spread":0.27076384818325683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514322907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4767773,0.0024753374,0.00008188485,0.4043465,0.0006279261,0.00024560132,0.0000021047047,0.000025746389,0.11541761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99369997,0.0016348824,0.00000427137,0.0014048021,0.00046804125,0.0000011246008,8.721229e-7,0.0000061827027,0.0027798808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578226,0.00017613162,0.00020940344,0.000097770484,0.00042071287,0.003313699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992245,0.000095683565,0.00008663967,0.000112229216,0.00014727283,0.0003337189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026528852,0.00009673717,0.000095830015,0.00017547984,0.0014578531,0.00023598722,0.00043718616,0.000063089035,0.000026670965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002971313,0.00007828508,0.000035605422,0.00082576426,0.00007216169,0.00035463905,0.000006829365,0.000948222,0.0000063681728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010522869,0.000008887598,0.005874703,4.2094626e-7,0.000011850485,0.000003292437,0.0054239724,0.000026420963,0.000009204929,0.9635194,0.002584252,0.022527058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002698241,0.00013795083,0.011222558,0.000023498467,0.000014027294,0.00008644139,0.064272106,0.000053328433,0.0000029401913,0.091283835,0.83236384,0.0002696495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006828136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05294747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515441809","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1008","title":"A Kindler, Gentler Supreme Court?: The Case of Burns and the Need For a Principled Approach To Overruling","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09241839410031798,"score_gpt":0.35808402014848256,"score_spread":0.26566562604816457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515441809","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062190477,0.40445814,0.013362297,0.19758946,0.0011058061,0.03037591,0.0001434437,0.00041998507,0.2903545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573497,0.034456618,0.0013525931,0.00418993,0.00033041058,0.00042561768,0.0000047451954,0.000040846102,0.0018495029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814713,0.00036288542,0.000422955,0.00030213397,0.00035714937,0.00040776972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848056,0.00051632314,0.00017730307,0.0004665785,0.00019930014,0.00015990749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035652935,0.00017766464,0.00048107756,0.000021951668,0.0006481866,0.00008489422,0.00047695803,0.00006344276,0.000084792526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062125694,0.00010083654,0.00020851975,0.00032722089,0.0006913244,0.0001370809,0.00012485348,0.00012800228,0.000008666802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014663786,0.000106060375,0.00012946638,0.0016503934,0.000082479106,0.000026190197,0.00643505,0.000012726,0.000035465877,0.9717015,0.01649263,0.0031813947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005681022,0.000039372062,0.000019095112,0.0010593582,0.00031621748,0.00013707657,0.0015779443,0.0002520152,0.000008191111,0.0013352334,0.99450874,0.0001786219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009488835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005718473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97801614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003878949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008872731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515931003","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Lawyers' Guide to Extraordinary Remedies [Book Review]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pagination; Publishing; Law; Index (typography); Project commissioning; Criminal law; Political science; Management; Art; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0513728380658188,"score_gpt":0.41695961395766357,"score_spread":0.36558677589184474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515931003","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008494838,0.71151596,0.000012049317,0.2084873,0.0010433006,0.00023743938,0.000001498437,0.000025757568,0.07018188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057658605,0.82841015,0.001066342,0.016039813,0.0031350604,0.000012523303,3.0854122e-7,0.000024384066,0.0936528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756163,0.00027015296,0.00070690794,0.00014974445,0.00088138884,0.00043019207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809146,0.0005771185,0.00027145486,0.00016530202,0.0007053722,0.00018931794],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00315334,0.00016089123,0.00041981996,0.00004595613,0.001930574,0.00012126243,0.00053089194,0.00003715904,0.00030753762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019336011,0.00009938962,0.00022616392,0.00023776281,0.0007277604,0.00053184544,0.00006434077,0.00028663964,0.000055109067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106143576,0.000022840239,0.000051926487,0.0000901537,0.00008358771,0.00014828643,0.007515483,0.0000043969562,0.00003385473,0.0017062061,0.94352007,0.046717033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083673855,0.00025502796,0.0001678351,0.0017554621,0.00017557749,0.00009130564,0.015267805,1.5220874e-7,0.00004087136,0.00033017705,0.9817067,0.00012542907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038664657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009629524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19244748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019527289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023594892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516723310","doi":"","title":"Mistake of Law and Obstruction of Justice: A 'Bad Excuse' ... Even for a Lawyer!","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Law; Mistake; Duty; Criminal law; Mens rea; Economic Justice; Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Political science; Common law; Criminal justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030068005038148674,"score_gpt":0.3312826895287471,"score_spread":0.30121468449059846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516723310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97808415,0.0040577673,0.0036997146,0.0023331905,0.00025966243,0.00021990278,0.0000052237874,0.000013465415,0.011326946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949143,0.0036882856,0.00021018488,0.000030458372,0.00023067325,0.000002526874,4.7180126e-7,0.000005874873,0.000917221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.000059671816,0.0002201398,0.00009498167,0.00021925491,0.00073536567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943024,0.000114573624,0.00018073789,0.00006250459,0.00015212412,0.000059792786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013811537,0.00006127859,0.00014272195,0.00003512009,0.0003165203,0.000020797912,0.00013276035,0.000056756,0.000018734167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015667325,0.00005684092,0.00007167614,0.00009309612,0.00021741628,0.00019177356,0.000009302266,0.00025753136,6.7362373e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014863371,0.0000287219,0.00040201956,0.000034816105,0.000031272197,7.363157e-7,0.0020697804,0.000004984795,0.0013478395,0.9851216,0.0000458722,0.010763687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010861283,0.0008577757,0.00096075865,0.00013221812,0.00037632938,0.00027403064,0.03147283,0.000034078992,0.00058152294,0.84350395,0.120500796,0.00021959856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019197684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018050147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018375937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007420571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516769900","doi":"10.4324/9780203072578.ch21","title":"Rights in the criminal process: a case study of convergence and disclosure rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Process (computing); Political science; Business; Criminology; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.10183539024514793,"score_gpt":0.37305202186754033,"score_spread":0.2712166316223924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516769900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3046484,0.00047410536,0.0000022047677,0.00028451977,0.00014191814,0.000906826,0.00000758127,0.000019253488,0.6935152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92637515,0.000021087099,0.000008558418,0.000020953898,0.00011591587,0.000014625526,9.614662e-7,0.000005410107,0.07343731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825025,0.0001157093,0.00033023502,0.0003381701,0.00076333544,0.00020230474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990655,0.0001971771,0.00016291061,0.00024437494,0.00022358898,0.00010641918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468494,0.00020523697,0.00032337726,0.000074497395,0.0003613378,0.000052302694,0.00037377037,0.00016409012,0.00037147626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033898337,0.00011721576,0.00004238422,0.00005848413,0.000528841,0.0002403491,0.000049248185,0.00025579613,0.000013197989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004738247,0.00020113596,0.0002630036,0.00011549564,0.000026007252,0.003679758,0.22722675,9.695736e-7,2.1999536e-7,0.76635903,0.0018546216,0.00022563172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009433241,0.0014592913,0.000118271826,0.00056116027,0.000784791,0.0008844024,0.33480802,0.000011300772,0.000005455931,0.36272597,0.29672885,0.0009691716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09376157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4809761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62172675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003598713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001351461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91227317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517139555","doi":"","title":"Reconceiving Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Rhetoric; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030506958084614153,"score_gpt":0.30359293618077937,"score_spread":0.2730859780961652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517139555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549771,0.0021177407,0.0013827247,0.0055849124,0.000866222,0.000116469506,5.2871417e-7,0.00007152052,0.034882814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758041,0.012873272,0.00007483204,0.00013937625,0.0015375057,0.0000028467557,2.7987025e-7,0.000010909401,0.009556899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671644,0.00015703938,0.00021896952,0.00015879414,0.0004441715,0.002304586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994286,0.00009147111,0.00011891585,0.00010997689,0.00009096027,0.00016013507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021339643,0.00009863123,0.0001362152,0.000058242433,0.0015623585,0.000055085384,0.00037265097,0.00007034883,0.000140265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023701458,0.00009185308,0.000115016315,0.00016989981,0.0002076788,0.00038608603,0.000027316206,0.0010874509,0.00013473218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006268662,0.0001420736,0.023554109,0.000007309718,0.000099985315,0.000069001355,0.024929726,0.000034480563,0.00054909516,0.8959619,0.008045937,0.046543736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000675503,0.00056205865,0.0062968605,0.0001168034,0.000060226408,0.002025629,0.03249846,0.000038523547,0.00019167959,0.23851936,0.7183025,0.0007124147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014786565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01887289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7102565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011050373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033414874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518073180","doi":"","title":"Jean Carol Boucher.\" L'appel à la Cour du Québec d'une décision du Tribunal administratif du Québec\".","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.01736773204067625,"score_gpt":0.2504581679360994,"score_spread":0.2330904358954231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518073180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7308775,0.011438049,0.0016009281,0.21711874,0.0009926193,0.00037112267,0.00006959348,0.00017261831,0.03735881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9047147,0.0024735783,0.00024016223,0.0014093928,0.0015092047,0.00002504781,0.000008912287,0.00004979762,0.089569226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623585,0.0005712944,0.0006333412,0.0006734332,0.00083495816,0.0010511182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677134,0.0016226709,0.00028257273,0.0004321612,0.00017694873,0.0007143182],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013026572,0.0004516587,0.00056057924,0.00008499679,0.001440073,0.000325852,0.00083443517,0.000776527,0.004352495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013940755,0.00050033565,0.00043249255,0.000580568,0.0031329982,0.0005095424,0.00007832846,0.00094088994,0.001314954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043153772,0.001410661,0.04381527,0.00038692655,0.00028037408,0.0026524572,0.12573132,0.00033799704,0.00048571825,0.16675422,0.425914,0.23179953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006579906,0.00033702457,0.004505165,0.00020416094,0.00026137425,0.00018879851,0.008696243,0.0022906314,0.00014337986,0.0018902067,0.9801842,0.0006408212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7522933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8039328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5542702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028636768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016334757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518101157","doi":"","title":"The Problematic Revival of Section 229(c) of the Criminal Code","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Mens rea; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Conviction; Political science; Criminal code; Recklessness; Jury; Pretext; Homicide; Accidental; Criminology; Criminal law; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control","score_opus":0.016411850688049134,"score_gpt":0.30361685926737747,"score_spread":0.28720500857932835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518101157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820236,0.00068593025,0.00025693758,0.010138883,0.0013433764,0.00022643666,0.0000010273183,0.000009579254,0.0053142617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643046,0.0013822046,0.000029236477,0.000016945,0.00037584384,0.0000026487571,6.3576614e-8,0.0000053117874,0.0017572688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811006,0.00022381029,0.00030012653,0.00007630613,0.00048126958,0.0008084432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.0001954602,0.0003409152,0.00017003674,0.00018502504,0.00003964331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048174914,0.00006451495,0.00011559693,0.000021578826,0.00087645283,0.000038428618,0.00054316455,0.00005647626,0.000028153021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005960347,0.000035046865,0.00013266533,0.0001784523,0.0004266688,0.00013140698,0.000030785646,0.0012895867,0.0000027127903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045828594,0.000040374936,0.0013762098,0.0000379066,0.000036050806,2.2266904e-7,0.0036044645,0.000007858746,0.011482366,0.97468257,0.00030836833,0.008377759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034120464,0.00037937614,0.005243388,0.00021242113,0.00025750345,0.00024395512,0.032446463,0.000043274482,0.0025574665,0.9165369,0.041556764,0.00018127057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008610284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043203674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058145676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001504449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021048696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9742554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519272843","doi":"","title":"Comparing ‘Appels’ and Oranges: An Examination of the Link between Appeal Processes and Judiciary Structures in Canada and France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.03341949782215095,"score_gpt":0.26418834079707515,"score_spread":0.2307688429749242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519272843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953229,0.0038372362,0.000030165696,0.00040027843,0.000028971672,0.000067428955,7.527255e-7,0.0000024283231,0.00030988277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779606,0.0020213495,0.00001763414,0.00001589656,0.00013085874,7.205247e-7,2.0108169e-7,0.0000033692502,0.0000138872265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901634,0.00011812809,0.00013248184,0.000099897545,0.00018379166,0.00044933576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996982,0.000059973157,0.000098792974,0.000042438744,0.000046918274,0.00005362552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089145044,0.000059120066,0.000116049196,0.000028651008,0.00027132893,0.000023654417,0.00013087594,0.00003165204,0.0000022082431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007474287,0.000044671833,0.000006072774,0.00011653078,0.000166943,0.0002328427,0.000023799583,0.00040113824,2.5229289e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009651933,0.0000028773359,0.9050557,0.000029084656,0.000008824704,7.4288135e-7,0.008856016,0.0000011817119,0.00001817971,0.00910625,0.0000011332551,0.07691033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012522849,0.00004935405,0.9343242,0.000056389603,0.000015797516,0.0000116272,0.011349328,0.000008653802,0.000044617573,0.053879254,0.00007592743,0.000059643844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7396263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25071353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015616942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019566992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34711006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519504190","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Hélèna Katz, Justice Miscarried: Inside Wrongful Convictions in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.015210332814278476,"score_gpt":0.29481736980840534,"score_spread":0.27960703699412687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519504190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01777062,0.92939425,0.00013831013,0.033858176,0.0012902861,0.00027211502,0.0000040548157,0.000021296164,0.017250925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7312006,0.2520035,0.000015513826,0.008484843,0.00085003313,0.000009556503,0.0000016580702,0.000013354273,0.007420946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605477,0.00028442856,0.0003474018,0.00013734838,0.00050998584,0.0026660806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991725,0.00015469338,0.00014793548,0.00013720836,0.00009351991,0.00029413964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026090206,0.00012755075,0.00021183041,0.000053919637,0.0006248297,0.000034643224,0.000317913,0.000052875694,0.0006664329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004089929,0.00012203442,0.00007288476,0.00026602767,0.00008126963,0.0006211859,0.000024543579,0.0013859519,0.000053582866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049982304,0.00012442592,0.019924121,0.00020949777,0.00010720688,0.00003377135,0.0038545385,0.000028053608,0.00004755277,0.14161713,0.81809586,0.015907856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014096971,0.000028863875,0.0011571025,0.00022832578,0.00012777417,0.0001412976,0.015154235,0.000002862104,0.000007462058,0.0018296503,0.98100156,0.00017988312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82496315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005233802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01703099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520347466","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047651","title":"<i>R v Hart</i>: A New Common Law Confession Rule for Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Law; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Common law; Criminal law; Certainty; Exclusionary rule; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04186499080328038,"score_gpt":0.31676668930801893,"score_spread":0.27490169850473856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520347466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067774124,0.00016745046,0.06411686,0.07898476,0.0017800936,0.0008205812,0.000049975428,0.0001950562,0.7861111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708004,0.0003065304,0.0031603912,0.0031409406,0.00057884416,4.404938e-7,0.000011898889,0.000012944014,0.0057079527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839526,0.00038860727,0.00021946587,0.00018208691,0.00034943724,0.0004651503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855286,0.00033301374,0.00012771456,0.00019114053,0.00020069287,0.00059457263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010376378,0.00013023667,0.00024011909,0.00005391443,0.0060892454,0.00030398698,0.00053455494,0.00013281454,0.000203219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048044974,0.00013455142,0.00014684009,0.00013762902,0.00031644545,0.0010874352,0.00008282277,0.00036321342,0.000013703283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845,0.000049776838,0.00035728482,0.000012189391,0.000011344494,0.000005448765,0.0014641095,0.0001157943,0.000021364986,0.98140055,0.013215202,0.003248468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008608386,0.00014907501,0.00015395133,0.000076521035,0.00004830439,0.000012373011,0.003408694,0.0002481718,0.000027504018,0.020011634,0.9748395,0.00016342902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030355997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28314072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028904964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039547205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522670710","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1232","title":"Section 7 of the Charter and the Principled Assignment of Legislative Jurisdiction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Denial; State (computer science); Public administration; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04174553504976886,"score_gpt":0.3260634755590338,"score_spread":0.28431794050926495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522670710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10652293,0.34922013,0.00082852866,0.092471436,0.00418195,0.007262494,0.000025602507,0.0000788798,0.43940803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98174417,0.017416969,0.0000146424945,0.00029314484,0.00015594758,0.000022350581,3.4405053e-7,0.0000028079096,0.00034960467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988425,0.0004432108,0.00021210822,0.00007065855,0.0003086474,0.00012286818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940753,0.00013085907,0.00018306177,0.00016145849,0.00008414721,0.000032925156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002124565,0.000055873425,0.00018218707,0.000005249267,0.00021990399,0.0000075662697,0.00012200544,0.000028871293,0.000104257175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011486473,0.000028395936,0.00008636103,0.00010340518,0.0005216057,0.00019297235,0.000041010953,0.0000721109,0.0000034234363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034350447,0.000067453504,0.0036576677,0.001261982,0.0000465616,6.2873646e-8,0.01544653,5.785172e-7,0.0003418876,0.9726649,0.0023626022,0.0041154046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016307688,0.00002048724,0.0039754338,0.0014902764,0.00017757482,0.0000013725391,0.0002633981,0.000004402364,0.000306567,0.0006567374,0.9928851,0.000055542412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012827954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061621756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030871655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003225401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19392116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522895673","doi":"","title":"Common Law Police Powers and the Rule of Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Predictability; Common law; Political science; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022954663328689017,"score_gpt":0.31365202964521705,"score_spread":0.29069736631652804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522895673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3585311,0.00070213736,0.000014411066,0.0054336768,0.00024658334,0.00021622321,0.000007451332,0.000051148007,0.6347973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943295,0.000072333285,0.00015791242,0.0039185295,0.00023470813,0.0000038415264,0.0000013042253,0.000009435093,0.0012724362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985955,0.00016386127,0.0002579318,0.00018650612,0.00041174225,0.00038448544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987726,0.0005641272,0.00010103646,0.00027469703,0.00007506307,0.00021248324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019516974,0.00010974079,0.0002211612,0.000016791113,0.0007758275,0.00010627377,0.00037284312,0.00009685001,0.00016966606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060773717,0.00008282889,0.00008284779,0.00014661106,0.0023027342,0.00032333581,0.00008658821,0.00020021577,0.00007470364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008531316,0.000021098793,0.000558372,0.000012804097,0.00000950082,0.0000029554276,0.006250158,9.2469884e-7,0.00014177634,0.9921462,0.0005122163,0.00025868448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076439336,0.00005586915,0.0016824077,0.000073540905,0.000050582144,0.0000052744,0.0067986795,0.0000026662296,0.0016947427,0.037933815,0.9507225,0.0002155335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4382136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33340424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95421237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044150464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039149094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84845203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526342888","doi":"10.21991/c9r67h","title":"Charkaoui: Beyond Anti-Terrorism, Procedural Fairness, and Section 7 of the Charter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Terrorism; Political science; Law; Immigration; Government (linguistics); Section (typography); Refugee; Business","score_opus":0.03484792083386847,"score_gpt":0.2658367904835917,"score_spread":0.23098886964972323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526342888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6028938,0.0015556791,0.013016182,0.029970406,0.010483751,0.0022490984,0.00027481007,0.00033100508,0.33922526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983885,0.00008954191,0.00018043742,0.0006312063,0.00020585494,0.00004355522,0.000007979248,0.0000058883566,0.00044702995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981439,0.00008958921,0.00040354155,0.00035943292,0.000490369,0.00051314844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990008,0.000066856286,0.00021261384,0.00024389414,0.00031316574,0.00016268992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041383773,0.00020904826,0.00024826557,0.000103672275,0.0019899132,0.000054149863,0.00034900312,0.00018369127,0.00027288272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002771998,0.00016637311,0.0001578606,0.00033718217,0.009965986,0.0009039913,0.00015112339,0.00021998744,0.000030410592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033728298,0.00007104592,0.06196468,0.000030649026,0.000026140726,0.0000036103866,0.0014148267,0.0000049067926,0.00045793774,0.9327063,0.002890798,0.00039536742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003589387,0.0003411913,0.14739227,0.0014320841,0.00055326376,0.00096701016,0.05587777,0.00031989772,0.010022477,0.1809461,0.5963042,0.0022543622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087730924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010499896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7517602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103896564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010692738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526424115","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Duty and Discretion: The Attorney General in the Charter Era","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Duty; Legislation; Law; Scrutiny; Political science; House of Commons; Discretion; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Democracy; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.02027537683318832,"score_gpt":0.30708910682330437,"score_spread":0.28681372999011606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526424115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88757545,0.0032909024,0.00042811208,0.10292306,0.00014640577,0.00011754018,3.3068926e-7,0.0000092822875,0.0055089253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237454,0.0045704576,0.000015081959,0.0010568958,0.00078232377,0.0000018927137,2.4140294e-7,0.0000024755088,0.0011960862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982748,0.00027645685,0.00013860132,0.000101454956,0.00025689654,0.0009517684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971455,0.00007996662,0.000053731983,0.000084764666,0.000027980916,0.000038995793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043160585,0.00006560275,0.00007293856,0.000020165453,0.00079052383,0.00016477623,0.00028297663,0.00003818223,0.00003513674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006365353,0.000035563568,0.000046295954,0.00011757263,0.00011181884,0.00022495133,0.0000063825837,0.0010190353,0.0000065545782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035305653,0.000025584635,0.0022260842,0.000001133505,0.000011101731,0.0000068626573,0.016539807,0.000010567423,0.0000805831,0.8869175,0.00034747212,0.09379804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005827703,0.0005477829,0.04748932,0.0000658442,0.000056324152,0.0006734426,0.061477806,0.00020927913,0.00001907243,0.75117266,0.13736235,0.0003433694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057144725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01467796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13701487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023580733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059403485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8190647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527184592","doi":"","title":"A Flawed Compass: A Human Rights Analysis of the Roadmap to Strengthening Public Safety","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Scrutiny; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Mandate; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.04969152503861261,"score_gpt":0.352417466790031,"score_spread":0.30272594175141837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527184592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79997015,0.000015558373,0.0003338633,0.021424163,0.00006082825,0.0001653969,0.000003992995,0.000056027122,0.17797005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969123,7.7761354e-7,0.00022152286,0.0003212026,0.000047100046,0.000001700891,0.0000016729444,0.0000014360708,0.002492316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880064,0.00015853586,0.00023281263,0.00016062795,0.00041474582,0.00023262274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993479,0.00010129397,0.00007519254,0.00025300446,0.000102703205,0.00011990938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058382796,0.0000685799,0.00020095037,0.00011858024,0.001000071,0.00007644319,0.00047514142,0.00003749313,0.00076297356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009046451,0.000043300297,0.00018113047,0.0014706358,0.000107612505,0.00014630878,0.00003712535,0.000062456784,0.000011380765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011456231,0.00008017524,0.0032357709,0.0000016056505,0.00012808185,8.683727e-7,0.012231244,0.00014191074,0.00039975782,0.97720706,0.0030620599,0.003499981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032881423,0.00017959483,0.3317191,0.00007124747,0.0010551317,3.8967366e-7,0.008457173,0.0010606346,0.0007523523,0.013148203,0.64273727,0.0004900885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013161709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14290607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000593117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039515584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99340975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529430945","doi":"","title":"In Harm’s Way: The Limits to Legislating Criminal Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm principle; Law; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Harm; Charter; Political science; Legislature; Criminal law; Discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.11598880782107583,"score_gpt":0.37274322908642266,"score_spread":0.2567544212653468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529430945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015953775,0.040298834,0.0028576935,0.4343528,0.002201673,0.0047232294,0.0006222142,0.0002838459,0.49870595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747308,0.0035929317,0.00022132747,0.020433107,0.00044858354,0.00013774577,0.000013015482,0.000011100197,0.00041138052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963546,0.00054827286,0.0006728411,0.00053568446,0.0011204216,0.00076817133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732333,0.0008907233,0.00018765863,0.00054378435,0.00077942904,0.00027504668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025605632,0.00034230112,0.00046959185,0.000041888772,0.0021461886,0.00025185363,0.0012145712,0.00010440577,0.00047764785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014199597,0.00022676802,0.00020059565,0.00047829465,0.0056314627,0.001006019,0.00021649925,0.000551459,0.0004018401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038879294,0.000057038582,0.000019101228,0.00012021925,0.000012960917,0.0001137806,0.0031578827,0.00015453299,0.000046767513,0.9903207,0.0055182744,0.00043985358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002883344,0.00012979841,0.00010172819,0.0030056157,0.00016344248,0.00026210683,0.003909053,0.000009773804,0.00011035288,0.020597218,0.9709492,0.00047340643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05520877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09136313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96972346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027758002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013466623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532419641","doi":"","title":"Sustainability and the Courts: A Snapshot of Canada in 2009","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental science; Computer science; Ecology; Database","score_opus":0.006305023844079425,"score_gpt":0.2799499710413897,"score_spread":0.27364494719731025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532419641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88953364,0.00003877192,0.000001828412,0.045093454,0.00006754622,0.00011608842,7.469586e-7,0.0000020627913,0.06514588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885935,0.000008671997,0.000018177363,0.00015805318,0.000017497137,0.000002457831,8.465648e-8,5.5158387e-7,0.0009351846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995699,0.000055431537,0.0000736328,0.000055860663,0.0001322292,0.0001129766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.00027864292,0.000017024448,0.00007378722,0.000071401635,0.00003523648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010572253,0.000022480239,0.000058843474,0.0000062194304,0.00009865503,0.000011323634,0.00009072331,0.000019172687,0.00030711287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093404535,0.000013655342,0.000008207866,0.000058049212,0.0004533657,0.000047800557,0.000016659298,0.000070127426,7.473899e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052238556,0.000018211918,0.031906467,0.000019158988,0.0000016911522,0.0000036163092,0.009311827,0.0000022483569,0.000026004856,0.9404567,0.016418662,0.0017831778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089300046,0.000029480947,0.17935678,0.00001491373,0.000015241248,0.0000021478393,0.11312727,0.00013845948,0.00021003534,0.16876061,0.5372471,0.00020491048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7716961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033018747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008336852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33626705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532661443","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1216","title":"The Journalist-Source Privilege in Quebec Civil Law: Globe and Mail v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing); Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Globe; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.04143474144170627,"score_gpt":0.2844770461666488,"score_spread":0.24304230472494254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532661443","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020231325,0.5036296,0.000027704737,0.052401215,0.0012234645,0.001462134,0.000026398466,0.00008499377,0.42091313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7910505,0.18523987,0.0001441427,0.011945729,0.00048340336,0.000057196685,0.0000036574445,0.000031546046,0.011043994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977321,0.0004912988,0.00043267256,0.00027248703,0.00055434415,0.00051707856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989411,0.00018047488,0.0001483067,0.00034439506,0.00012712886,0.00025859533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020326006,0.00017526028,0.0003412031,0.000010167163,0.00083305157,0.00013240859,0.0005741833,0.000061261315,0.0004151245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021785623,0.00012533941,0.00007760775,0.00018379813,0.0005119629,0.00031672005,0.00010305184,0.00022757992,0.000018776493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094477455,0.00002285508,0.0015974359,0.00043619974,0.000016258957,0.000046185698,0.0013283452,3.1027818e-7,0.0000064896462,0.92492044,0.06454046,0.0070755635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007083414,0.000011595264,0.00080333126,0.0013723046,0.000044296354,0.000009665471,0.00023776706,0.0000020147581,0.000008153421,0.0010682506,0.9961959,0.00017585518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99983037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93165547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030367146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070854026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64072436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533569213","doi":"","title":"The Chimera of the Real and Substantial Connection Test","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Test (biology); Law; Supreme court; Honour; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02315052089063038,"score_gpt":0.30922388047761773,"score_spread":0.2860733595869874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533569213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7965706,0.000095149386,0.000006542878,0.019870419,0.00012550411,0.00006947243,5.6695654e-7,0.000012603095,0.18324915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643916,0.0003573202,0.000018206036,0.000055991157,0.00015165746,7.57054e-7,3.411568e-8,9.529637e-7,0.002975915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996745,0.00003498327,0.00005672622,0.000044459564,0.0001157793,0.00007352402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996075,0.00026928907,0.00002399916,0.00005746613,0.000024859599,0.0000168976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029588243,0.00002043072,0.00002670514,0.000003018824,0.0005352073,0.000027799144,0.000084134845,0.000016724998,0.000054694527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014036206,0.000009961387,0.000015838676,0.000059678554,0.00026376217,0.000066745255,0.00001426315,0.000029345896,0.0000039723623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025082725,0.000036939764,0.035988115,0.0000040526434,0.0000065141257,1.9627942e-7,0.010544622,0.0000034032007,0.003743918,0.8892222,0.0059180823,0.054506887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002181749,0.00007971422,0.24004696,0.000023807052,0.00003505569,0.0000026757966,0.016446522,0.00017974839,0.00890322,0.0037448516,0.7301827,0.00013658262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006924078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06189006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88547736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009103014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002806311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534048536","doi":"","title":"Social Host Liability in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Liability; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.010936009675002644,"score_gpt":0.2761102150038482,"score_spread":0.26517420532884556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534048536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971046,0.00061355426,0.000049791193,0.013495581,0.0001937787,0.00006451848,0.0000011374611,0.000008243361,0.014527427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972544,0.00024437785,0.0000058416704,0.000073409356,0.0007124087,0.0000016111019,5.5913506e-7,0.0000046916466,0.0017027213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973357,0.00015557026,0.00019605464,0.000115162,0.00038647823,0.0018110583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997144,0.00006357851,0.00006833683,0.00004897548,0.0000542233,0.00005053595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018889724,0.0000678482,0.00010974917,0.000030004743,0.0005349651,0.000045427885,0.00023362823,0.000041564814,0.00005875686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085073094,0.00006690993,0.000047043875,0.00019593468,0.00008225459,0.00015982764,0.000013527503,0.00087660376,0.0000073686297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003476395,0.00005401423,0.18191983,0.0000041461785,0.000009506397,0.000018158744,0.0009221262,0.000017457895,0.00005692323,0.80659395,0.0031334723,0.0072356723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048041623,0.00006741157,0.19574432,0.000018804256,0.000021039312,0.00003155421,0.038442347,0.000012621306,0.000033706707,0.6299934,0.13479461,0.0003597696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99497074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17660053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073755006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023462245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534827492","doi":"10.29173/alr99","title":"Causation in Canadian Insurance Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Liability insurance; Liability; Insurance policy; Actuarial science; Tort; Insurance law; Casualty insurance; Business; Auto insurance risk selection; Key person insurance; Economics; General insurance; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03141934140317674,"score_gpt":0.3206979214174632,"score_spread":0.28927858001428647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534827492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015299682,0.027494181,3.57954e-7,0.055214394,0.00018248413,0.00074586953,0.0000015165546,0.000012720675,0.9010488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971493,0.014957722,0.00001780865,0.011788748,0.000051568524,0.0000674294,0.0000036082488,0.0000050610106,0.0016150379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903744,0.00013779537,0.00019241139,0.00014713818,0.00014588167,0.00033929903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999369,0.00015124446,0.000040401635,0.00016146374,0.000056713423,0.00022115151],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004363315,0.00006978325,0.00016143172,0.000014549701,0.00022232698,0.00005390865,0.00018666986,0.000046580182,0.0013314409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023551307,0.0000643221,0.000038247064,0.0002155874,0.00013701277,0.0004568062,0.000009967732,0.00007620086,0.0015664225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9017597e-7,0.0000056371387,0.002960238,0.00016521869,0.0000013148785,0.0000017128745,0.00044535074,1.8158876e-7,0.0000014885386,0.9888143,0.0035170615,0.004087309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024205854,0.000004630222,0.004327769,0.0011110133,0.0000058330825,8.187655e-7,0.000024025294,0.0000012812345,0.0000020492546,0.0013671448,0.9930405,0.00009069872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99911994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013990299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015784273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535297782","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of Australian and Canadian Anti-terrorism Laws","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Charter; Law; Political science; National security","score_opus":0.03959968419385505,"score_gpt":0.3756960561318573,"score_spread":0.33609637193800224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535297782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847067,0.001386178,0.00017509211,0.0068100886,0.00017777988,0.000065371336,9.877863e-7,0.000008244491,0.006669529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743277,0.0005916755,0.000040608484,0.000041716194,0.00020130104,2.2553954e-7,3.7852521e-7,0.000004827404,0.0016864823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977062,0.000055237535,0.00021527612,0.000091902584,0.00023298047,0.0016984504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994565,0.000043932032,0.000099415665,0.00005816683,0.000064763335,0.00027716803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029613404,0.00006573812,0.00014484527,0.000102034486,0.00044657386,0.000040453884,0.00017830492,0.00007453865,0.000042729273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065627086,0.00006318235,0.0000421167,0.00014335457,0.00016810019,0.0001526606,0.000008585411,0.0006687482,0.0000067039978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029437462,0.00005590059,0.31068593,0.000011787314,0.00006200076,0.000020388037,0.015655786,0.000004619597,0.0006089436,0.62494713,0.0013034135,0.046614632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007054104,0.00074851,0.13014227,0.00013183536,0.00013568756,0.0003036767,0.24501495,0.000011520427,0.00090665795,0.12946555,0.49186343,0.00057051075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30763248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95361257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64598006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005467086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021953976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6969781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536848170","doi":"","title":"Secret Evidence and the Due Process of Terrorist Detentions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Terrorism; Dilemma; Political science; Process (computing); Intelligence analysis; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03060036457333357,"score_gpt":0.3263640262883576,"score_spread":0.295763661715024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536848170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92646235,0.0043728063,0.00019406206,0.031216944,0.0002514721,0.0005736827,0.000007084914,0.00009149391,0.03683008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721754,0.00027459135,0.00012913841,0.0006789476,0.00016122265,0.000014169104,6.2847175e-7,0.0000039701267,0.0015197678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987886,0.00018378998,0.00021651342,0.00019945644,0.00037509436,0.00023656433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991095,0.00029629367,0.0001046247,0.00021731829,0.00013463029,0.00013761155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010626158,0.00008917723,0.00017466815,0.00001951477,0.00066672254,0.00011971927,0.00035708025,0.00006019207,0.00012746845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008065569,0.00006397646,0.0000690788,0.0002194777,0.0008547111,0.00042795192,0.000029565565,0.00015171674,0.000021897475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001697129,0.000083604806,0.0043340703,0.000084048486,0.000017041504,0.000012631751,0.0122856805,0.00001343372,0.0006570443,0.9764849,0.001289081,0.0045687626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004063187,0.0009888808,0.16441438,0.0037353202,0.0007235773,0.00008837112,0.062179044,0.00040493876,0.0048283404,0.5380422,0.21869382,0.0018379422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074876132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010842433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43844268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025190831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115475144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W153742565","doi":"","title":"The Proportionality Principle, Counter-Terrorism Laws and Human Rights: A German-Australian Comparison","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Public law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Criminal law; Terrorism","score_opus":0.02413193335707089,"score_gpt":0.3907962341262353,"score_spread":0.36666430076916445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153742565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860715,0.0002348904,0.00006416706,0.009579554,0.00037254315,0.00016489696,0.0000012595088,0.000029027224,0.0034821304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99221534,0.00014877024,0.00002137839,0.000034120403,0.0006894356,0.0000061761534,0.0000014026117,0.0000065879335,0.0068768035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973936,0.00015271959,0.0003236749,0.0001736234,0.00049831654,0.0014580758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927187,0.00007447184,0.00021660335,0.0001555028,0.00013023616,0.00015131838],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154706,0.00011418961,0.00013752095,0.00002665631,0.00377528,0.0003062637,0.00038868363,0.00009509813,0.000063932464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057819325,0.00007643686,0.00006898725,0.00008483368,0.00058196264,0.00031230788,0.000035831228,0.0019931763,0.000017642285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017549753,0.000051422274,0.008649483,0.0000027500328,0.000026023183,0.00000269568,0.0011221138,1.9645165e-7,0.00023583397,0.98818725,0.0006121179,0.0010925902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019774628,0.000103154765,0.008419943,0.000012246431,0.00002862963,0.000105645486,0.002169114,0.0000047540075,0.00004056875,0.3441609,0.6446227,0.00013458346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004378614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30155942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6440263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002866998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007626001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538339521","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Hope for the Innocent?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Commission; Criminal justice; Criminal case; Economic Justice; Test (biology); Criminal trial; Index (typography); Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.3043360029925013,"score_gpt":0.45668675107153356,"score_spread":0.15235074807903226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538339521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000032320717,0.1726907,0.00017035114,0.08751693,0.00055222586,0.0030363086,0.00022839113,0.00005129228,0.73572147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018306592,0.14727756,0.00006960829,0.000083983236,0.00036209673,0.0000052185146,0.00002512459,0.00002240042,0.8503234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582,0.00073037576,0.00025992625,0.00047544902,0.001970755,0.0007435154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908368,0.0050498694,0.00053154276,0.0013079757,0.0019739927,0.00029983252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007355594,0.0002212236,0.0005364614,0.000114316106,0.013853578,0.00024748527,0.0045746723,0.0002705458,0.0003103196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004652834,0.00017713982,0.00044583195,0.00019595688,0.006527927,0.000302025,0.0007774881,0.0009744692,0.00013069146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016422785,0.000026179958,0.0000045529505,0.0010914274,0.000047309124,0.00012492292,0.0010888925,8.911075e-8,6.108271e-7,0.019624477,0.9073305,0.070496775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015498327,0.00014389862,0.00006697546,0.0030532528,0.00026330093,0.000015863796,0.006770782,0.0000070498218,5.1979526e-7,0.0019426792,0.9873784,0.000202274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020503454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027633123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11460189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081021717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00436215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541607608","doi":"10.11575/prism/29741","title":"It Came From South of The Border: Effects of the USA PATRIOT Act and More on Canadian Libraries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Legislation; Patriot Act; Subsidiary; Political science; Business; Public administration; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.010430008022406501,"score_gpt":0.22562567583462964,"score_spread":0.21519566781222313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541607608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98477256,0.00021839121,0.000008294389,0.0027658937,0.00026881217,0.00017563996,0.000016166532,0.000008376623,0.01176587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697006,0.00003226431,0.00006574827,0.000101730475,0.000045164634,8.452663e-8,7.369928e-7,0.000004223581,0.002780006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990376,0.00012419435,0.000113489674,0.00016824815,0.00035860596,0.00019783246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990155,0.00030832062,0.00022096458,0.0002566709,0.00007337554,0.00012517707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017026953,0.000091196394,0.00018520291,0.0000468655,0.0015331324,0.000033158092,0.0005521958,0.00010786446,0.00004367803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013129185,0.000073361975,0.000120396915,0.00028662596,0.0008958119,0.00021621726,0.00016112837,0.00012335274,9.12562e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030298706,0.00014540364,0.6152782,0.00019508114,0.00017308672,0.00008163125,0.35857666,0.000017106291,0.0074639614,0.0054392647,0.008326525,0.004000112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002664769,0.0001258279,0.8757862,0.00023953768,0.00011095894,0.0000016920329,0.056308433,0.0000074782597,0.008576295,0.0000726071,0.058350664,0.00015387284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.542862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4681414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30226824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008818994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046996208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544197200","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, Canadian and American Hearsay and Confrontation Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Jurisprudence; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05538563774118799,"score_gpt":0.3946579378165523,"score_spread":0.3392723000753643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544197200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292783,0.0194735,0.000011583599,0.024286842,0.00010667329,0.0012743934,0.00010634665,0.000005824383,0.025456537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956589,0.0026033698,0.00025789984,0.0013218758,0.00003730965,0.000044121887,0.0000017048734,0.000002147104,0.00007271873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992398,0.0001515851,0.00021021241,0.00012451639,0.00014508652,0.00012880944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999476,0.00014694662,0.00008600119,0.000046845264,0.00011331242,0.00013086587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005435245,0.000073585885,0.0002388363,0.000023504814,0.00014896138,0.000025867408,0.00007265344,0.000021207628,0.000009563124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003566106,0.00005642688,0.000014421413,0.00009722706,0.00061416475,0.00022919687,0.00004069684,0.00007434841,3.635238e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020186562,0.000013967483,0.0021877692,0.000119154385,0.000009066219,7.041004e-7,0.0034216482,9.7662934e-8,0.00009646308,0.9932824,0.00007248017,0.0007761102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000456891,0.00030866713,0.028590089,0.0025741034,0.00006209025,0.000020115647,0.0067513273,0.000061344974,0.00059305667,0.00459343,0.9556983,0.0002905863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33622944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72370267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98868895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039988256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007944595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66819066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544416007","doi":"","title":"The Rebirth of Bicycling Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; The Renaissance; Political science; Cycling; Enforcement; Law; Order (exchange); Law enforcement; Environmental law; Public administration; Business; Geography; History","score_opus":0.03096553146203026,"score_gpt":0.26427190770232517,"score_spread":0.2333063762402949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544416007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420374,0.00023338267,0.000015291072,0.005881246,0.00016491443,0.00022398472,0.0000059608496,0.000038153026,0.051399693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99238735,0.00015155024,0.00036893974,0.00008427627,0.00006349578,3.639288e-7,0.0000016195122,0.000008361687,0.006934031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830157,0.00029685476,0.00018296936,0.00023167153,0.000597782,0.00038918498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842596,0.00047492996,0.00023661226,0.00037096592,0.00031182327,0.00017968638],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013353861,0.00011008294,0.00020957092,0.000065497254,0.0020142493,0.000061879764,0.00093709596,0.00014785465,0.00077052147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002748862,0.000106147214,0.00017649539,0.00035463227,0.0013708597,0.0010147772,0.00021399866,0.000256295,0.0002672502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005307488,0.0003105044,0.2667993,0.00020696067,0.0002548804,0.00003649409,0.06432625,0.000041850828,0.029144572,0.6114754,0.0068039955,0.020068998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012786775,0.00027047805,0.42331856,0.00036074297,0.00019462824,0.0000060406974,0.09190849,0.000034169287,0.0047735604,0.03302619,0.4440837,0.00074475695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013621864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015585176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57844925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008663214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111406895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545986919","doi":"","title":"Proportionate Liability Under the CBCA in the Context of Recent Corporate Governance Reform: Canadian Auditors in the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Audit; Corporate governance; Accounting; Business; Legislation; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Limited liability partnership; Going concern; Sarbanes–Oxley Act; Legal liability; Law; Political science; Auditor's report; Finance","score_opus":0.026533791800995556,"score_gpt":0.2779171014756111,"score_spread":0.25138330967461553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545986919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616296,0.0024356162,0.0000094092175,0.116915606,0.00034729156,0.0006709222,0.0000065328704,0.000005250378,0.01797979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933739,0.0037977004,0.0000018213899,0.00069482607,0.00014876296,0.000018446784,0.0000011307887,0.000007520745,0.0019559332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956514,0.0015738097,0.00040820678,0.00018434312,0.0007429683,0.0014392191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865544,0.000386259,0.0004526942,0.00031576093,0.00012468058,0.000065192144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01575898,0.00013544742,0.00015404983,0.000027652013,0.0011666684,0.0000914164,0.00094836374,0.00007825627,0.00018953084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004916561,0.000059083133,0.00008450175,0.0005427981,0.00057898846,0.00022910758,0.000023334554,0.0015024819,0.000025283749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119623495,0.00009785159,0.01238902,0.0000071106156,0.000040015104,0.000011681052,0.018773539,0.00036295442,0.00002931754,0.9587001,0.0038010688,0.005667673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007208455,0.00029508275,0.060806923,0.00009585535,0.000068588015,0.00022160863,0.30961126,0.00006856306,0.000081312086,0.22272824,0.4049233,0.00037843906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19963105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96954125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76991016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052851005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006580453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548647802","doi":"","title":"Ambiguous Cause-in-Fact and Structured Causation: A Multi-Jurisdictional Approach","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Common law; Law; Tort; Law and economics; Political science; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.028767843018887945,"score_gpt":0.30975134549549177,"score_spread":0.2809835024766038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548647802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787183,0.005294631,0.006920476,0.0016496279,0.00039870112,0.0002543787,0.0000022171787,0.00004291435,0.006718765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544835,0.0025683898,0.00047549425,0.000051535302,0.00017722507,0.00000459301,0.0000010594412,0.000009109087,0.0012642548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976782,0.00026232717,0.00020122138,0.00019364027,0.00035015598,0.0013144483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996219,0.000037329926,0.00008415504,0.00007348094,0.00006320193,0.000119883305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019642795,0.000108745095,0.00013331209,0.00009034642,0.00059922365,0.00010043131,0.0001281094,0.00009258651,0.000055793716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014894892,0.000101143916,0.000046913625,0.00020056799,0.000139046,0.00028807312,0.000009669617,0.00096420076,0.0000056450604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052573934,0.00012179526,0.029069727,0.000009267152,0.000081214814,0.00001707449,0.0071202605,0.00013043013,0.00014758507,0.951824,0.0000896341,0.011336423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004233988,0.00055922195,0.15062678,0.00007817571,0.00019842888,0.0032957338,0.08149159,0.00039601637,0.00012027637,0.7110217,0.046774082,0.0012039994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017489963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025669733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2408023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078813714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020451525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99210924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549952279","doi":"","title":"Common Law Police Powers and Exclusion of Evidence: The Renaissance of Good Faith","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Statutory law; Obligation; Charter","score_opus":0.0442284115639389,"score_gpt":0.32478520024062507,"score_spread":0.28055678867668615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549952279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8664281,0.0034549807,0.00001425378,0.0063884733,0.00018286663,0.00030599645,0.000012939657,0.000042323234,0.123170115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788564,0.00027935163,0.0001635811,0.0003584053,0.00017995761,0.0000060368525,0.0000011903089,0.000008950167,0.0011168744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834836,0.00025175896,0.00032601066,0.00022125397,0.000565981,0.00028662014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986968,0.000518459,0.00021278461,0.00033769434,0.00012810962,0.000106151885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001056965,0.00011984746,0.0002412915,0.000022990822,0.00059525715,0.00006175907,0.00044477225,0.00009418013,0.00010360031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010249386,0.00008219585,0.00007435464,0.0002654919,0.001352522,0.00047488272,0.00012860587,0.00016575307,0.00001408351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007200865,0.00006338744,0.014204042,0.00008686125,0.000009544217,0.0000026471855,0.0034227222,0.000021746304,0.0044173677,0.97258705,0.0046136663,0.0004989549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010759196,0.0006631769,0.09772536,0.0027462586,0.0002405535,0.000017603888,0.016344173,0.000040831394,0.026868708,0.06543024,0.7878987,0.00094847416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38337055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18592666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9071568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043978333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007668537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82892805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550062160","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice: The Impact of Injunctions, Contempt of Court Proceedings, and Costs Awards on Environmental Protestors and First Nations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Political science; Imprisonment; Legislation; Economic Justice; Human rights; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01699583569190439,"score_gpt":0.34010446155599167,"score_spread":0.3231086258640873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550062160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994054,0.0002147498,0.000027865706,0.0035393692,0.0000878285,0.000306317,0.000007692942,0.0000044417634,0.0017577341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810946,0.0015239156,0.000011859474,0.000018936484,0.0001225227,0.000009090271,2.6651514e-7,0.0000049449613,0.00019903132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990283,0.000025065758,0.00014943443,0.000095945994,0.00026307543,0.00043817057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950445,0.00015528464,0.00013928313,0.00004756016,0.000062728126,0.00009070117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012663769,0.00007162012,0.000100509256,0.000077750134,0.00077187235,0.000072853414,0.00019027317,0.000044463297,0.000028299424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049259077,0.000048159844,0.000038585014,0.00013011681,0.00026707046,0.00027263284,0.000032918662,0.00056316913,0.0000013960603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000616783,0.0005588816,0.4280855,0.00008036664,0.00030807577,0.000001275909,0.01926135,0.000056375025,0.008678127,0.51731193,0.0047001042,0.020341232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029467612,0.009543851,0.75668097,0.0007917647,0.00087928004,0.0006012032,0.13725288,0.00021243865,0.0019927283,0.042333644,0.045641806,0.0011226997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015214585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014416153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47497827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032491988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006528939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80445516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552903448","doi":"","title":"L’influence des médias électroniques sur la formation de l’opinion publique : du mythe à la réalité","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011239523625749481,"score_gpt":0.21399876812094848,"score_spread":0.202759244495199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552903448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8464273,0.030835984,0.002217,0.010831528,0.00040143586,0.00025975658,0.00003435054,0.0001947558,0.10879789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974231,0.0061670127,0.00069759024,0.00021656534,0.00040747307,0.000017201344,0.000021748096,0.000016599532,0.01822482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997183,0.00086007017,0.0003394154,0.00037601142,0.00057706295,0.0006644438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983907,0.00048303595,0.0002524101,0.00022664452,0.00036395583,0.00028329133],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010856997,0.00027949194,0.00023388282,0.00013474982,0.006686378,0.0002147682,0.0004283452,0.00038936955,0.000041856576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019102365,0.00032477293,0.0002201423,0.00043313377,0.00152547,0.0030006347,0.00014864992,0.00034085973,0.000038335296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024558778,0.00034243212,0.023982253,0.00020654383,0.00006519135,0.00081216125,0.040819827,0.0067704692,0.0037216588,0.90661585,0.010988737,0.005429302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048699265,0.00010730023,0.09164141,0.00041867731,0.00012597411,0.0013304381,0.007262311,0.0013343527,0.0038669487,0.0141300345,0.8788021,0.0004934148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36940873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027783066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8924858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083572855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026107666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554861059","doi":"","title":"Be Careful What You Wish For? Terrorism Prosecutions in Post-9/11 Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Torture; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Deportation; Legislature; Punishment (psychology); Scholarship; Criminology; Immigration; Human rights; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01282732146322533,"score_gpt":0.2812383531742361,"score_spread":0.2684110317110108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554861059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277082,0.0017561105,0.0006186244,0.06744182,0.001005165,0.0003054055,0.000007187283,0.00001974928,0.0011377373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636406,0.0009922052,0.00002480339,0.00069224345,0.000508748,0.000014937223,0.000005149243,0.0000107932765,0.0013870621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708295,0.00014382962,0.00022995318,0.0001759094,0.00039120295,0.0019761496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993612,0.00010767007,0.000101937825,0.00011208958,0.00017579125,0.00014128824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022102466,0.00010603566,0.00014847428,0.000060377686,0.00068980176,0.00017991407,0.00035058951,0.00007505956,0.000022044247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036112094,0.00010113908,0.000073520634,0.00016644198,0.00008619894,0.0006346203,0.000019621159,0.0007101534,0.0000021826936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095753974,0.00009944463,0.010045281,0.00002265064,0.000064266824,0.000011760435,0.012587096,0.00005624999,0.00019565997,0.91610205,0.0054023685,0.05531739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092615763,0.00043746768,0.0023669456,0.00011992153,0.00006305554,0.00010805542,0.20360965,0.00006399171,0.000059141516,0.1346995,0.6570917,0.00045447415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73212314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99844706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7814026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024089676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010215394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555190754","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493683.014","title":"The post-9/11 migration of Britain's Terrorism Act 2000","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Globe; Political science; Law; Politics; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.038543922509763344,"score_gpt":0.25947983713298467,"score_spread":0.22093591462322132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555190754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002233572,0.00023939919,0.000047436784,0.0003806426,0.00028306505,0.00034457972,0.000070969945,0.00005379432,0.99634653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024152957,0.00030550102,0.000023700622,0.000061621824,0.00022344929,2.6485657e-7,0.000014333374,0.000016819276,0.97520137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986073,0.00007700994,0.00020426296,0.00028201795,0.0005105791,0.00031884565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985406,0.00027896964,0.0002918933,0.0003585632,0.00038419318,0.00014581742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051376846,0.00020061106,0.00024052478,0.00009472686,0.0008189967,0.00006121095,0.00066632894,0.0003468792,0.000009218164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051013627,0.00019579829,0.00022425,0.000012274334,0.0008917564,0.0001402863,0.00014006767,0.000286208,0.000010528904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009867169,0.000005919002,0.000014116185,0.00002827653,0.000036646037,0.00006873209,0.0012810517,3.1548709e-7,0.000027107573,0.9688351,0.025144735,0.00445931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010799232,0.000041587715,0.00012113809,0.000117691525,0.00012863216,0.0000023302969,0.0010683277,0.0000027520398,0.00008938994,0.000020654577,0.99808776,0.00021171919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03030135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077087237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97294307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029155234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004120118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97615594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556567886","doi":"","title":"Governance and Anarchy in the S.2(B) Jurisprudence: A Comment on Vancouver Sun and Harper v. Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Parliament; Law; Charter; Political science; Standard of review; Constitutional law; Corporate governance; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.016026220415887815,"score_gpt":0.27559777243190337,"score_spread":0.25957155201601556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556567886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88055515,0.0011842638,0.000007475735,0.097482435,0.0003768044,0.00035933097,0.000018207844,0.000018631279,0.01999767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788561,0.00041021098,0.000073759715,0.019945355,0.00011137462,0.000018464398,5.3259595e-7,0.000005529167,0.00057870883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986409,0.00011879356,0.00014112452,0.0002455299,0.0005337685,0.00031989545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941045,0.00019051413,0.00004709094,0.0001852212,0.00002681711,0.00013989276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005574912,0.00011045996,0.0001279258,0.000010812921,0.00048796245,0.00015201367,0.00026387692,0.000048674705,0.000048319565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012742961,0.00008377982,0.000018914132,0.00014504617,0.00029957417,0.00032072078,0.000047984435,0.0002381578,0.0000068121326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007297319,0.0001066009,0.015712272,0.00003946301,0.000010561312,0.00017620613,0.008022081,0.00006260684,0.000030020381,0.83511466,0.13909957,0.0015529797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003972324,0.00006883171,0.032270934,0.00013117025,0.000008306565,0.0000026468385,0.0034463792,0.0000023316431,0.00005289706,0.0043508634,0.9590998,0.0001685961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9490037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8307638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029390323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003495616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3753062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556715205","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Cincinnati law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Law; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Homicide; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychology; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.05866183048251948,"score_gpt":0.24791293127653288,"score_spread":0.18925110079401342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556715205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02597325,0.012047022,0.000045522233,0.005245215,0.00017011048,0.00037238744,0.0000115127805,0.000021402851,0.9561136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98032033,0.01830928,0.00017363222,0.0005070539,0.00000693827,1.0697978e-7,8.5819624e-7,0.0000017274025,0.00068004313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994309,0.00009734458,0.00009535037,0.000086917935,0.00016938243,0.000120086916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996459,0.000042570813,0.00006260218,0.00010280496,0.000080729675,0.00006541138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027020444,0.000040794617,0.00015174357,0.000016131924,0.0001432302,0.000001415767,0.00021668251,0.000018345125,0.0019243429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038954582,0.000047011003,0.000034333138,0.00018107193,0.0001438955,0.0001365742,0.000025934427,0.00005610561,0.000017170918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082261295,0.00004001689,0.0060896147,0.000589128,0.000011220299,0.0000881283,0.00455697,7.6210154e-7,0.0000027007645,0.971589,0.0116835,0.0053406944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006382511,0.000008530349,0.0035632318,0.0007513154,0.00002887924,8.260546e-7,0.002386333,0.0000013850206,0.000006178978,0.00021814388,0.9929055,0.00006587931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99933356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026378347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007651764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560253997","doi":"","title":"New Strategies for Enforcement of the Access to Information Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Compliance (psychology); Government (linguistics); Law enforcement; Business; Law; Political science; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.041996010761305526,"score_gpt":0.33917820612983285,"score_spread":0.2971821953685273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560253997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22255498,0.0024690535,0.39960527,0.11634463,0.002493178,0.002945507,0.000011961358,0.00009299943,0.25348243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977342,0.0005018808,0.00007173599,0.00021619348,0.00018305075,0.0000037978837,2.2256339e-7,0.000002158345,0.001286748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987714,0.000029364746,0.00016842152,0.000039056504,0.00027586118,0.0007158835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996343,0.000038098697,0.000115408606,0.00006741082,0.0000859061,0.000058839396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081002904,0.000047172565,0.00006287013,0.000034528028,0.0003633572,0.00019817092,0.0004558156,0.000026752534,0.00020235573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010047,0.00003268311,0.000069118185,0.00014727267,0.000026797836,0.0012411453,0.000026163685,0.00021855129,0.0000096483855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017567427,0.000005732004,0.00013229852,0.000004514457,0.000012960335,1.8590047e-8,0.005712843,0.00014383922,0.000016911043,0.9111932,0.004764066,0.07799606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030557142,0.0002898839,0.0003568352,0.000041968626,0.000033971253,0.000008011041,0.031717353,0.0000653201,0.00017047364,0.5694142,0.3974781,0.00011829624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020928592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011966893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016215879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66778076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561714858","doi":"","title":"Conflicting Stories and Reasonable Doubt: Variations on W. (D.)'s Theme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Appeal; Supreme court; Reasonable doubt; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03375833885951644,"score_gpt":0.3309667963353046,"score_spread":0.29720845747578817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561714858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32986075,0.0010747684,0.00014308747,0.028682325,0.00058818347,0.00037488027,0.000015996076,0.00029947807,0.63896054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98496187,0.00011905738,0.0010127466,0.0011572017,0.0009304951,0.00001538902,0.000002180229,0.000010124748,0.011790931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988554,0.000098543496,0.00015358665,0.0002418953,0.000328412,0.00032217574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915683,0.00029729248,0.000065276465,0.00018588893,0.00008536455,0.00020935677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006747475,0.00010412158,0.00012840312,0.000024574483,0.0012608758,0.000252013,0.00017510209,0.00008186259,0.00058645016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045647268,0.00010042242,0.00003761576,0.00013865628,0.0002102288,0.0005486357,0.0000417586,0.00017948193,0.0002871431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016019641,0.000030308624,0.0012737089,0.000006323892,0.000008070525,0.0000024413687,0.004838071,0.000018943218,0.000111849695,0.9887182,0.0028582057,0.0021178664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001660501,0.000037896298,0.0013709046,0.0000471256,0.000017821438,0.0000017869978,0.0021561808,0.000028565542,0.00025389317,0.0037599704,0.99200654,0.00015324572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015211234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022380427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106993146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009150655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562007790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2560006","title":"Bill C-51 Backgrounder #1: The New Advocating or Promoting Terrorism Offence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08342724735089906,"score_gpt":0.35506988928396616,"score_spread":0.2716426419330671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562007790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5464807,0.013045325,0.027518254,0.37098378,0.0035808054,0.0011929405,0.000001147468,0.0003331319,0.036863938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789997,0.00078882993,0.00022780229,0.0003214016,0.0017402199,0.0000035013907,2.903291e-7,0.000015652075,0.017902644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636984,0.00031218654,0.0002863833,0.00019844336,0.0006762703,0.0021568986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989696,0.00019962028,0.00021458662,0.00016963096,0.00016655188,0.00028001948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006558174,0.00013376166,0.00014278654,0.00004045973,0.0010941841,0.00027051824,0.0007202773,0.00007327823,0.00006912989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011811355,0.00007109794,0.00008262389,0.0003392611,0.00017709272,0.0005877256,0.00006409291,0.0013982272,0.000082945924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003003002,0.00016252992,0.004051604,0.000020282178,0.00018942353,0.00004377698,0.15937248,0.00006758425,0.0004403515,0.44452164,0.021753442,0.36907658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006442009,0.0006181161,0.0002242948,0.00016275141,0.00007942366,0.0006816248,0.2905731,0.00015138657,0.000065192085,0.49502447,0.21137737,0.00039806866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010501563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03845261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43251896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011309446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011351228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568613422","doi":"","title":"Searching and Seizing after 9/11: Developing and Applying Empirical Methodology to Measure Judicial Output in the Supreme Court's Section 8 Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Judicial activism; Judicial opinion; Operationalization; Political science; Judicial review; Majority opinion; Judicial interpretation; Judicial independence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.29014840128974323,"score_gpt":0.4451319402961774,"score_spread":0.1549835390064342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568613422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579195,0.00037139474,0.023146298,0.016043967,0.0002428217,0.00035788317,2.974543e-7,0.000029397,0.0018884408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98663324,0.000042094885,0.011194834,0.0015004803,0.0005265585,0.00005125383,1.5805394e-7,0.000005574174,0.000045806108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978385,0.0009694598,0.00016115983,0.00021446185,0.0003629658,0.00045346926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982987,0.0014246678,0.000027190525,0.0000765491,0.000044930024,0.00012797097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065808804,0.00009318722,0.00014527285,0.00008230825,0.00051684235,0.00013183328,0.00013411442,0.000092307,0.000010513933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011951266,0.000070174734,0.000019272724,0.00024966357,0.00015223463,0.0004338655,0.000108714186,0.00021452762,0.0000045751403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008227731,0.00002397227,0.68888855,0.000047160556,0.000008865414,0.0000114487875,0.24388425,0.0000071965824,0.00049057096,0.019985307,0.00050998776,0.046060387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023142777,0.000060933522,0.78665304,0.0002141176,0.000044298227,0.00006169743,0.08559307,0.000069467605,0.00018913319,0.0034531008,0.12296316,0.00046656758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006724957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024939477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15829118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076190125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007843059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568708948","doi":"10.3968/6550","title":"Reflections on “Not Rescuing People in Danger” From the Perspective of Criminal Law Legislation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Connotation; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Imperfect; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); China; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.33748921769039925,"score_gpt":0.5177260157062584,"score_spread":0.18023679801585918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568708948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386352,0.00080114295,0.000006626179,0.00793614,0.0004696939,0.00010965005,0.000002739857,0.000006988779,0.05203188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926186,0.00019486918,0.00023440577,0.00017826656,0.000087303204,0.000009748756,1.6629791e-7,0.0000015936644,0.00003178286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987192,0.00027183138,0.00019704788,0.00023400885,0.00035816114,0.0002197518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.0011056412,0.000111484864,0.00013422593,0.00035249072,0.000027219357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003117251,0.00005747377,0.00018504275,0.0000701769,0.0005108316,0.0000044800763,0.00037363556,0.00004917438,0.0000037410493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036833012,0.00004346634,0.000028122276,0.0005194423,0.033285223,0.00022074947,0.00010892491,0.00016400097,0.000002135138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025301591,0.000020617386,0.0024026092,0.0000016158762,0.0000030856152,5.593991e-7,0.6311428,0.00006336052,0.00031612505,0.36587375,0.00009594322,0.0000542391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107012806,0.00010836605,0.019508032,0.00005317465,0.000007992266,1.9115704e-7,0.9129226,0.000009688371,0.00019535769,0.066757806,0.00028387888,0.00004589912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043854523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10003267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29911596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040673598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026928962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568732596","doi":"","title":"What is Terrorism? Assessing Domestic Legal Definitions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislation; CLARITY; Political science; Principle of legality; Statutory law; Law; Notice; Scope (computer science); Law enforcement; Jurisdiction; Consistency (knowledge bases)","score_opus":0.3275889453753762,"score_gpt":0.46643166416832027,"score_spread":0.13884271879294408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568732596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242663,0.00018898337,0.00009456422,0.06359561,0.0008639243,0.0009469446,0.0001420469,0.0002351216,0.009666546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94110674,0.0023912888,0.0013480652,0.0002749041,0.0007739938,0.000008708594,0.00011197719,0.000035291454,0.053949036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361867,0.001180886,0.0003981457,0.0008719,0.0020950213,0.0018353647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583226,0.0009826877,0.00016095664,0.00064823346,0.0013799483,0.0009959388],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016084682,0.00036499446,0.00045338785,0.00072658825,0.0027532913,0.001888879,0.0013198147,0.00043211144,0.0027187285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004354415,0.00037328713,0.00023373091,0.0018069998,0.0017370677,0.005213089,0.00042448434,0.0015661992,0.0015601045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045841254,0.0034253218,0.0751351,0.0006397961,0.0005315455,0.003972414,0.038593166,0.00017527517,0.0017963728,0.13628928,0.7144169,0.024566414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018827699,0.00048699407,0.15273543,0.0010929808,0.000187169,0.000083430714,0.2143116,0.0001588018,0.00009671438,0.0064767697,0.6211242,0.0013631325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072172716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027466105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17571843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058845675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009771261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570709259","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1165","title":"Hislop v. Canada: A Retroactive Look","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06325346545679207,"score_gpt":0.3141698399751598,"score_spread":0.25091637451836774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570709259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003823544,0.21131887,0.000036892954,0.056113727,0.00082253217,0.001060752,0.000023500535,0.00013918246,0.726661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82725775,0.1516783,0.00019602428,0.012191232,0.0004061173,0.000045471894,0.000007694967,0.000019477451,0.008197957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982405,0.00021249254,0.00025076262,0.0002526611,0.000660992,0.0003826349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990972,0.00012028752,0.00009028132,0.00028114914,0.00020242433,0.00020864616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005770461,0.00012791369,0.0003300812,0.00001005357,0.00070270774,0.000016004235,0.0003458198,0.00004866724,0.0011607019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033351147,0.00011614086,0.00009877841,0.00022445565,0.00035592206,0.00024940367,0.000041949046,0.00015757699,0.00013883873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008095237,0.00003386397,0.0004988958,0.0005961982,0.00002701391,0.00017113665,0.0008848033,3.1578685e-7,0.000009716983,0.31677777,0.6781932,0.002798972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004371365,0.000014383899,0.00025097627,0.00094117125,0.000044913864,0.0000150519845,0.00009912337,4.4558712e-7,0.00001573532,0.00034338026,0.99807584,0.00015528746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82506603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.904812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041400056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016685723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577588864","doi":"","title":"Troper, Michel. Le gouvernement des juges. Québec: Université Laval, 2006, 53 p","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018435474875056774,"score_gpt":0.2606443649946084,"score_spread":0.24220889011955163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577588864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7374008,0.17758356,0.0003854391,0.05116588,0.0028365676,0.0011438071,0.000110827736,0.00030688968,0.029066185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86619246,0.025260849,0.0012379636,0.0010240376,0.0013676776,0.000046795587,0.000010621801,0.00009309822,0.10476649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955522,0.0005267128,0.0007028217,0.0009147303,0.00090141373,0.0014021677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972858,0.0003504792,0.0004043611,0.00079306227,0.0003937973,0.0007725171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531319,0.00060803175,0.000790836,0.00013949288,0.00222992,0.00035111062,0.001263365,0.00042528322,0.0017204529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055392226,0.0006539236,0.00047127105,0.001058789,0.0022211093,0.00068157463,0.00033651042,0.0009665286,0.0011323603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114904,0.0014378483,0.018772775,0.0007274147,0.00028194964,0.00042827037,0.016436297,0.000015793234,0.005974388,0.13953559,0.7127257,0.10354908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006331254,0.00022840672,0.005928165,0.00039001674,0.000529552,0.00005495318,0.0037697079,0.00004570225,0.0004066773,0.00012395937,0.9871423,0.0007473826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25121754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15501921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27441666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027038166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033189117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579547169","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009947","title":"Constance Backhouse Carnal Crimes: Sexual Assault Law in Canada, 1900–1975. Toronto: Irwin Law, 2008, 442 p.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sexual assault; Sociology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.020380505510634583,"score_gpt":0.2780890863079728,"score_spread":0.2577085807973382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579547169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70321983,0.010704896,0.000023570654,0.016791698,0.0019712362,0.00048064798,0.00033806387,0.000027299993,0.26644275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98063326,0.00058401865,0.00023508746,0.016147286,0.00056479283,0.0000035621274,0.000007624712,0.000028465645,0.0017958871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664915,0.0002638183,0.00078875886,0.000411644,0.00041050004,0.0014761613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958719,0.00031481026,0.00037037866,0.0002754894,0.00051334564,0.002654075],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018788545,0.0003327449,0.0007202739,0.000034259803,0.0012295332,0.00025329413,0.0006254498,0.0003199945,0.00032627236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017428506,0.0003850261,0.00024383236,0.00019473629,0.0009887698,0.000988407,0.000016774691,0.00086568366,0.0000022078334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001675417,0.00002065363,0.00065732223,0.000045774323,0.00006829816,0.0007776766,0.03913321,0.000050795246,0.000034139764,0.9384074,0.019150006,0.0016379731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013209718,0.00031054614,0.0033090482,0.0004522873,0.00014639032,0.0003390293,0.14912592,0.000047891812,0.000022469405,0.009660719,0.83429456,0.0009701545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9287467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070278673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012539106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579678595","doi":"","title":"Prescribing Greater Protection for Rights : Administrative Law and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Right to property; Business","score_opus":0.05996083192953211,"score_gpt":0.2860038829731233,"score_spread":0.22604305104359118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579678595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664425,0.000009725372,0.000063105814,0.0017713149,0.00012996346,0.0009132563,0.000005510573,0.0000064553033,0.03065815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987153,4.3363926e-7,0.000074885495,0.000029739353,0.000057263092,0.000038183378,2.14445e-7,0.0000013473856,0.0010826517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996038,0.000039777395,0.00008464262,0.00008954337,0.00008314511,0.00009910479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972093,0.000026329877,0.000042710435,0.000051616906,0.00009968215,0.000058759157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013160608,0.000040456634,0.000062467814,0.000017589957,0.00051531853,0.0000376237,0.000041204286,0.000049751958,0.0000692586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012127745,0.000023681287,0.00001782615,0.00003792029,0.00034181055,0.00022328392,0.000006713417,0.000032100397,5.1864833e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075800286,0.00004341945,0.0041602114,0.00016290872,0.000056508357,5.4374937e-7,0.074721836,0.0000011513864,0.009547287,0.90715355,0.0027358066,0.0013409931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016520093,0.001801959,0.12195729,0.0006477849,0.00024717135,0.000021594338,0.0133925285,0.0010088233,0.26489207,0.447559,0.14596418,0.0008555832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9760558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45959452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023235394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041379593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39634657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579768026","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - a proposed alternative admissibility framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.13898011366843635,"score_gpt":0.38690226068965083,"score_spread":0.24792214702121448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579768026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605973,0.00097058894,0.0009213081,0.026242806,0.0010216241,0.0015098676,0.00009885386,0.000023703155,0.008613978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984338,0.000012272209,0.0005768828,0.00042519916,0.00046319776,0.0000261019,9.814253e-7,0.00001266039,0.00004887543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889712,0.0067937453,0.0013915502,0.0004781552,0.0014698271,0.0008955615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865681,0.010412891,0.0012085423,0.00059967546,0.0006247971,0.00058597315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049979955,0.00028898814,0.0006156624,0.00013065792,0.004220596,0.00096728327,0.0018609832,0.00028212272,0.00033111242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06504084,0.00015215331,0.00028511754,0.0005825615,0.00316238,0.0007289192,0.00010895528,0.0039257505,0.00000436607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047924227,0.00019044711,0.037687805,0.00005124483,0.00008006287,0.00008776967,0.8202464,0.00016252123,0.0005447733,0.13874418,0.00038320452,0.001342338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013898751,0.0002664084,0.030563658,0.0026040769,0.00044159495,0.000092197915,0.6683799,0.0007024569,0.00040045095,0.2785839,0.015605051,0.00097044936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21998106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.718244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49826294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082362397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006942973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582194580","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1127","title":"Expanding Victims’ Rights in the Charter Era and Beyond","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Substantive rights; Criminal justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.05504296271259491,"score_gpt":0.3383533561587946,"score_spread":0.2833103934461997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582194580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12550344,0.2360492,0.000023520708,0.09196172,0.0005866648,0.0019548475,0.000007395846,0.000105214385,0.543808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93151337,0.06260472,0.00006742312,0.0052749594,0.0001720728,0.000033378965,0.0000017652724,0.0000042010656,0.0003281086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.00025996348,0.00020292115,0.00018553833,0.00033655905,0.00025409015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994987,0.0001607582,0.00004582692,0.00018736425,0.000039847197,0.00006746571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001152567,0.000095967545,0.00021515555,0.000015838039,0.00070902007,0.00004389359,0.00025228603,0.00004002217,0.00030095511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054856773,0.00006196938,0.000056626282,0.00017720646,0.00031620846,0.0003022794,0.00002689546,0.00014501873,0.00008013525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009043752,0.00008214556,0.002076284,0.0008120803,0.000013824188,0.00015251369,0.026473073,1.3091942e-7,0.000037287085,0.9175481,0.048771594,0.0040239054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065058375,0.000016376474,0.0006960931,0.00082894316,0.000023140416,0.000025639933,0.00019998016,7.6617636e-7,0.000006683324,0.002326643,0.9957075,0.0001031415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002837964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006403933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94693595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002933829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003884782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5453281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582799247","doi":"","title":"The Sub Judice Convention: What to Do When a Matter Is 'Before the Courts'","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Parliament; Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027677521366686966,"score_gpt":0.320981256585466,"score_spread":0.29330373521877906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582799247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005043706,0.24115576,0.0000144713495,0.73621947,0.0013799435,0.0013997835,0.00001885716,0.000015101872,0.014752892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14835273,0.20033702,0.000068734495,0.63637435,0.0012104749,0.00017124151,0.00001777934,0.00003763171,0.013430047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983561,0.00015894443,0.00028901352,0.0002257494,0.00036407658,0.000606093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986935,0.00013041771,0.00007545396,0.0004072181,0.00008621921,0.00060718873],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024765446,0.00012524595,0.00017073163,0.000027972674,0.0013032295,0.000394122,0.0006327489,0.00004038478,0.004111609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005188715,0.00007935112,0.00012351641,0.00021947469,0.00027049915,0.00036301388,0.00003326137,0.0001375682,0.001973276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025477582,0.000003218246,0.002348228,0.00008913868,0.000016588832,0.000018426499,0.0036454839,2.6346997e-8,3.033436e-7,0.0026671514,0.88709164,0.10411723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002842421,0.000016637749,0.0013272719,0.001602275,0.000061276405,0.0000067096535,0.0072010015,1.15960056e-7,0.0000037303878,0.00090679503,0.98874503,0.000100730365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27544057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9090693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6336287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041767876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032551034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583043871","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1152","title":"The Shaky Foundation of “Statutory Platforms”: A Comment on Baier v. Alberta","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Legislation; Charter; Law; Political science; Obligation; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.0787740438001787,"score_gpt":0.347654343789321,"score_spread":0.26888029998914226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583043871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011207117,0.09706174,0.00011190262,0.22937956,0.0015843937,0.003143322,0.000012792525,0.00010481487,0.65739435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.678238,0.29378304,0.00014379257,0.020857438,0.0002707519,0.000094611176,0.000018705308,0.000022297392,0.006571363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986135,0.00011427582,0.00032914616,0.00015676122,0.0005335233,0.0002527954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875516,0.0005582238,0.00014548292,0.00031986265,0.00013632471,0.00008496201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001136883,0.00010316705,0.0002284795,0.000010302679,0.00095290644,0.000024658408,0.00034894765,0.000040103296,0.00043185105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033822976,0.0000682532,0.00012505411,0.00013609398,0.0005136894,0.00021502822,0.00003928209,0.00011220818,0.00023883629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001594977,0.000044431592,0.00012988853,0.00028683938,0.000014534713,0.0000021716924,0.0011059063,7.24914e-7,0.0000036472186,0.9028239,0.088999264,0.006572738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065178014,0.00005292945,0.00012892218,0.0011915728,0.00003275176,0.0000020509178,0.0001020671,0.000002960035,0.000017316283,0.0014928409,0.9968239,0.00008752945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007123864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009363338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90782464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009747261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015567025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583143683","doi":"","title":"The Consequences of Compelled Self-Incrimination in Terrorism Investigations: A Comparison of American Grand Juries and Canadian Investigative Hearings","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Witness; Jurisdiction; Interrogation; Contempt; Terrorism; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0347785693407037,"score_gpt":0.31353073315822033,"score_spread":0.27875216381751666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583143683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98682326,0.0018750224,0.0000147971805,0.010575969,0.000035888384,0.00012641851,0.0000011845179,0.000005858822,0.0005415718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521554,0.0044827694,0.0001793092,0.0000378102,0.000024781495,0.0000036862143,5.6144523e-7,0.0000037098528,0.00005186426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982937,0.0003088463,0.00033973157,0.00009765726,0.00027548964,0.0006845478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.00029935566,0.0003052567,0.000059489277,0.00015009659,0.0001317741],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001650857,0.000076202945,0.0002158284,0.00013429373,0.00083060784,0.000027168562,0.00018754991,0.000035105702,0.000001674723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004760768,0.00006114848,0.000031228297,0.00034570388,0.003748054,0.00019632028,0.000012460081,0.0004977118,4.857952e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004135041,0.000045188583,0.358414,0.00001550177,0.00006142688,0.0000030091053,0.15246393,0.000021687698,0.00069659593,0.48473898,0.00013427758,0.003364068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007376836,0.0008742118,0.12617408,0.00020810413,0.00008674293,0.00012151952,0.36153626,0.00017480493,0.0028018565,0.5014747,0.005480993,0.00032906845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4066644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8955689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48890454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004316652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005881046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585666025","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1120","title":"Rewriting the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: Four Suggestions Designed to Promote a Fairer Trial and Evidentiary Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jury; Law; Political science; Jury trial; Substantive due process; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.06931021079766578,"score_gpt":0.33675570795127946,"score_spread":0.26744549715361365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585666025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6707577,0.14863095,0.000096539006,0.14678325,0.0005886117,0.0121103125,0.000054558448,0.00013036605,0.020847682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917561,0.006615988,0.00018220913,0.00094094535,0.00018659378,0.000107709486,0.0000014572312,0.000007967043,0.00020104641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985084,0.00026285247,0.00031824465,0.00024373634,0.0003659169,0.0003008713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903286,0.00014958308,0.00009352277,0.00019570427,0.00024198323,0.00028636953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015717668,0.00011767112,0.00029553036,0.000032800315,0.0013904074,0.00006387747,0.00023941902,0.000058385882,0.000085441876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049637584,0.00008349236,0.000058478083,0.00023020912,0.00054067886,0.0002917863,0.000031774052,0.00011061906,0.000010794754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020599572,0.00050581596,0.005840451,0.018677961,0.00047247068,0.00062368554,0.120855436,0.0000048635366,0.0005354521,0.6412886,0.1596127,0.049522653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020696686,0.00033391622,0.0013854716,0.013221907,0.0004328443,0.00012125177,0.00046543474,0.0000126026525,0.000065131404,0.0059872516,0.97536105,0.00054344116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25649306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6750151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045259352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035288557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587873341","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Common Law Procedural Traditions, Edited by Paul Roberts and Jill Hunter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.01917383262053442,"score_gpt":0.31156649625010074,"score_spread":0.29239266362956634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587873341","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08207996,0.7998776,0.00009740891,0.113652,0.0002524813,0.0008223109,0.000005222351,0.00009445512,0.0031185923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82143086,0.16570672,0.000037286038,0.008749494,0.00057937554,0.000036274563,0.000006726701,0.00001809699,0.0034351326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720955,0.0002791719,0.00038382015,0.00028815027,0.00041259342,0.0014267309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999135,0.00015794318,0.00019283437,0.00012550264,0.0001435838,0.00024512157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013612102,0.00019200194,0.00028550465,0.00004690897,0.0018598122,0.00032995667,0.00027236235,0.00007400515,0.00038024693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060743772,0.00014567768,0.00006655385,0.00011398289,0.0004982302,0.002129759,0.000030737163,0.0012522944,0.00001710927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024922902,0.000095544354,0.00051345245,0.00039213488,0.00007254286,0.000014355454,0.0026243792,1.3158287e-7,0.0003793497,0.193593,0.7973792,0.004910973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035254253,0.0005501033,0.00049174286,0.004599927,0.0003231764,0.0010006494,0.0025397893,0.000010603121,0.00004733189,0.13662401,0.85293853,0.000521586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072472584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010718186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7393509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034250235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031191055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588053002","doi":"","title":"Law & Politics after September 11th: Civil Rights & the Rule of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Civil liberties; Supreme court; Fundamental rights; Rule of law; Deference; Terrorism; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.014189679959716756,"score_gpt":0.28900539590299984,"score_spread":0.2748157159432831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588053002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25667858,0.0048420075,0.00018179601,0.0044196555,0.00045841583,0.00015247769,0.0000031768911,0.000024678342,0.73323923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910983,0.00035619977,0.000029874269,0.0004911318,0.00031209268,0.000003427818,2.2396952e-7,0.000008982197,0.007699755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971706,0.00030543443,0.00024008611,0.00012184264,0.0004614469,0.0017005604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993504,0.00013460015,0.0001133594,0.00016459085,0.00012869822,0.00010834559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021824527,0.00010612807,0.0001439425,0.000021340364,0.00094092975,0.00007863988,0.0003130522,0.00007384763,0.0004444201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045799457,0.0000707585,0.00014572595,0.00011381664,0.0005508341,0.00024939334,0.000017294695,0.00082426565,0.00007793216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009072801,0.000029881538,0.00014601237,0.0000026126133,0.000029355959,0.0000033530087,0.0019520067,0.0000018305393,0.000018589055,0.99753016,0.00020834607,0.00006880321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008810295,0.000045191548,0.000039923485,0.000015356478,0.00003378889,0.00005113894,0.001396346,4.3789254e-7,0.00016406421,0.53191715,0.4661772,0.00007127442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060294196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1347245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7344197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039046755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011259296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9114719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589522395","doi":"","title":"Death, Dissent, and Diplomacy: The U.S. Death Penalty as an Obstacle to Foreign Relations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Battle; Appeal; Dissent; Diplomacy; Political science; History; Politics; Ancient history","score_opus":0.0372630089398062,"score_gpt":0.33443674182640937,"score_spread":0.29717373288660315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589522395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8415837,0.0003027953,0.00021253452,0.009964491,0.000110397785,0.00042047806,0.000009669031,0.00011293107,0.14728297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430794,0.00005889905,0.0009129141,0.0014455583,0.00028830237,0.000040036433,0.000005246955,0.000016106986,0.0029250234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998481,0.00013261172,0.00019606728,0.00034300395,0.00042644353,0.00042091554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998811,0.00017645235,0.00005435875,0.00035925242,0.00008429692,0.0005146128],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005818287,0.00014041827,0.00014019138,0.000027850578,0.0018471378,0.00033338284,0.0003884154,0.000079789985,0.00031253163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040379225,0.000108474436,0.00006343064,0.00020918305,0.00023531092,0.0007295768,0.00008728984,0.00020614064,0.0005011986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017289716,0.000039327242,0.015583767,0.0000035069068,0.00000695147,0.000012448165,0.0029732836,0.000053188982,0.00006298691,0.98072106,0.00024910748,0.00027705828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042829974,0.00023091989,0.10402245,0.00010342639,0.00008045323,0.000024074388,0.0071793245,0.0000091794645,0.00033715885,0.67080104,0.21635887,0.0004247764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03596772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0283289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013976307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018031317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590093714","doi":"","title":"Introduction: The McLachlin Court's First Decade - A Dynamic Time for Public Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.02747134308158231,"score_gpt":0.2854753863027534,"score_spread":0.25800404322117104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590093714","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069157295,0.008443265,0.016400928,0.8608483,0.0026016624,0.0013032267,0.000010155626,0.0002637542,0.040971402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98757255,0.0014612301,0.00014761384,0.00027177864,0.0020897866,0.000021168908,0.0000019507575,0.000016426104,0.008417493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971959,0.00014646622,0.00022057525,0.00019588866,0.00032142233,0.0019197558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992581,0.00013875285,0.00013503408,0.00017545254,0.00017400137,0.00011863236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041868533,0.000113423,0.00013059059,0.000043073727,0.0022151868,0.00016919988,0.000610275,0.000085801985,0.00048855675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027042336,0.000082295934,0.00014230143,0.00018676404,0.00037318424,0.0005001639,0.0000283664,0.00087256654,0.00015513609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004983062,0.000041549913,0.000038490005,0.0000028037002,0.00005004485,8.113475e-7,0.0022384843,0.000001414554,0.000020673924,0.98947513,0.004798158,0.0032826352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020293679,0.00021470244,0.00007129363,0.000008087035,0.000059431484,0.00013943104,0.00607787,0.0000855534,0.000016079066,0.30934122,0.6836426,0.00014077142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011298548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06546965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91841525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085147953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015762823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594900901","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1140","title":"Justice Bertha Wilson: A Classically Liberal Judge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Economic Justice; Classical liberalism; Law; Dissenting opinion; Sociology; State (computer science); Law and economics; Feminism; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.12039602237513411,"score_gpt":0.37005412232146506,"score_spread":0.24965809994633095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594900901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043206224,0.17109042,0.000099170946,0.09020505,0.0009235836,0.0011710506,0.000010301439,0.00035184147,0.731828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4436328,0.48199487,0.0017067108,0.04185652,0.0020563141,0.00012346417,0.00001849521,0.000057592286,0.028553214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976948,0.0003134181,0.0003854267,0.000360699,0.0007128878,0.0005327784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987231,0.000227743,0.00010992505,0.00038031142,0.00024542175,0.00031351065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009088908,0.00018742839,0.00044074148,0.00001640998,0.0009853063,0.000059014335,0.0005328435,0.000099719924,0.0012065336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048876595,0.00016462318,0.00022442032,0.00031091485,0.00065070007,0.00052158243,0.0000789452,0.00023962301,0.0010113146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014835096,0.00010576338,0.00019696634,0.0016548232,0.000021627162,0.00017636779,0.0011165886,5.2090957e-7,0.000021131893,0.5325054,0.4582818,0.005904201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089696165,0.000043644064,0.00017107125,0.0016123846,0.00020511124,0.00003386131,0.00004661203,0.0000036556683,0.000005627048,0.0007864615,0.99677557,0.0002263176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014604579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027509884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7032747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090676185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029340357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596973577","doi":"","title":"The Standard of Proof for Jurisdiction Clauses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Focus (optics); Perspective (graphical); Civil procedure; Standard of review; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Judicial review; Psychology","score_opus":0.018257362630048526,"score_gpt":0.339793371975986,"score_spread":0.3215360093459375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596973577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.635289,0.023257343,0.26803538,0.0424709,0.0024101904,0.0014361771,0.000010264417,0.00008898697,0.02700173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444234,0.0033570807,0.00007304768,0.000018632642,0.00048599878,0.0000025338938,1.979527e-7,0.000005114398,0.0016150605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998175,0.000050747032,0.0001989914,0.0000650914,0.00032159904,0.0011885257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927545,0.00027737004,0.0001382475,0.000060267368,0.00020083829,0.000047816848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079826005,0.00004638018,0.00007806414,0.000028527022,0.0010056596,0.000042223808,0.00019805168,0.000041660365,0.000006079485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029109442,0.000031556276,0.00008010865,0.000105932384,0.00015965357,0.00013839523,0.000007582048,0.00037756117,0.0000012209767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035665967,0.000012596608,0.00042239926,0.0000033991494,0.000025704589,2.5557992e-7,0.0011953998,0.000002103744,0.00013235245,0.906959,0.0005229855,0.09036714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509372,0.0007477214,0.0002613196,0.000021817048,0.000036789388,0.000017725333,0.02144479,0.000002618632,0.0013950514,0.55757034,0.41817832,0.00007256043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020103107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043751594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41765535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005071818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018951824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597958332","doi":"","title":"A Brief History of the Fifth Amendment Guarantee Against Double Jeopardy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Law; Conviction; Supreme court; Convict; Jurisprudence; Verdict; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Equal Protection Clause; Constitutional right; State (computer science); Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.05414645466410535,"score_gpt":0.303914890383577,"score_spread":0.24976843571947166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597958332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35238472,0.0007703442,0.000024067247,0.011732317,0.00045423306,0.00018253198,0.0000010007246,0.000037075977,0.6344137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.931927,0.00012717264,0.0001255407,0.0011246549,0.00013677415,0.0000055673127,2.0871654e-7,0.0000031553939,0.06654993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991723,0.000047594523,0.000142715,0.00011623613,0.00033925576,0.00018192454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963504,0.00003983743,0.000060469036,0.00018338807,0.00004472239,0.000036527657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036006715,0.000055243247,0.00008871691,0.000014214908,0.00013261756,0.0000119591805,0.0002996427,0.000032008375,0.00082325283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025514,0.000037943173,0.000079157406,0.00007123775,0.00028461465,0.0001355548,0.000045265082,0.000059444206,0.0000657122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011126164,0.00030960114,0.0018463851,0.000031281397,0.000026264333,0.00000335645,0.09062968,0.00017856184,0.00383866,0.438856,0.43840644,0.025762519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015503347,0.000011864457,0.00027043358,0.000017842718,0.000008695148,2.3106149e-7,0.0013893595,0.000018207285,0.0007268538,0.00013421322,0.99720776,0.000059534403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006008159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011382464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5795423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038716136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025970454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90825796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598155893","doi":"10.71781/1652","title":"L'émergence des limites à la liberté de tester en droit québécois : étude socio-juridique de la production du droit","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006994411420983061,"score_gpt":0.22078197470474828,"score_spread":0.21378756328376522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598155893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93301564,0.013244991,0.0005962307,0.0015368415,0.0011380769,0.00039653466,0.000017376384,0.00017659944,0.04987772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386079,0.007680906,0.0017784883,0.00014525515,0.000928838,0.000042060718,0.00006938406,0.00004989147,0.050697308],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995878,0.00088249915,0.0005248931,0.00087364524,0.0009209367,0.0009200248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971369,0.0009875471,0.00047134623,0.00035043168,0.00047594932,0.0005778223],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017491061,0.0005470194,0.00045878653,0.0002909265,0.009501357,0.00016641934,0.0007604551,0.0010784596,0.00008767277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079168135,0.0006961784,0.00045506965,0.00085658435,0.0018714526,0.0010875562,0.00014697395,0.00085388916,0.00008033449],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009424986,0.00078196893,0.13191432,0.0006259639,0.00041708793,0.0031671228,0.5958763,0.0033961595,0.031291243,0.21088113,0.0011535229,0.01955273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076590327,0.00030227454,0.43866977,0.0019303627,0.001447976,0.0029297748,0.28389007,0.00068603567,0.023192419,0.011770321,0.23239924,0.002015827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42475817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2948789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31198618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013267718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065007145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599651875","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1141","title":"Justice Wilson’s Administrative Law Legacy: The National Corn Growers Decision and Judicial Review of Administrative Decision-Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Tribunal; Law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Judicial restraint; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Judicial opinion; Deference; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial activism; Judicial deference","score_opus":0.17938520276895004,"score_gpt":0.4461744946053336,"score_spread":0.26678929183638356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599651875","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028995816,0.71159524,0.00067056826,0.036906768,0.00094424374,0.0032088752,0.000119758806,0.00008813354,0.24356681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6108609,0.3760761,0.0010227845,0.01168151,0.00024768425,0.000042103933,0.000005438771,0.000012491606,0.00005097586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961687,0.00052345364,0.000858832,0.00045069182,0.0016470512,0.00035132217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482256,0.0032730282,0.00046749512,0.00028069768,0.0009797657,0.00017642301],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003249483,0.0002574292,0.0006895583,0.000024443469,0.0014259838,0.0000725979,0.00058576505,0.000101764366,0.00054131955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004358204,0.00018669164,0.00022869527,0.00045617408,0.0018141518,0.0007322372,0.00011285072,0.00029990156,0.000047103087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011693935,0.00009772263,0.00004182039,0.0052542635,0.000046779307,0.000045617628,0.0015422436,4.2892714e-7,0.0000053509425,0.9230214,0.057844393,0.011983035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015597872,0.00018835026,0.00029024505,0.07572297,0.0004082877,0.00009250304,0.00051092193,0.0000045609745,0.000010644358,0.010504546,0.9118153,0.00029568555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066031143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038746595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91251683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010592547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088279037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600112519","doi":"","title":"Terrorism Offences and the Charter: A Comment on R. v. Khawaja","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Politics; Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01707341892154092,"score_gpt":0.30741818598590526,"score_spread":0.29034476706436435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600112519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53615916,0.0069270465,0.0025436345,0.41840035,0.00088539126,0.00040854194,8.003254e-7,0.000050147144,0.0346249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899903,0.0054628993,0.000009816483,0.0022236386,0.00053737394,0.0000021373767,1.4221581e-7,0.0000046242635,0.0017690476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774456,0.00017713332,0.00017047729,0.00011285018,0.0003917895,0.0014031971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994018,0.00029026272,0.00009428234,0.00008642379,0.000033194534,0.00009403225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008181199,0.00008263978,0.00011262671,0.00004072574,0.0010546232,0.00010342531,0.0002696838,0.00004399947,0.000029339973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010148648,0.00005030656,0.00006543162,0.00009483555,0.00039572496,0.00013581665,0.000021032198,0.00087975117,0.000020192556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014909187,0.000024045494,0.00059041113,0.000001212802,0.000024821376,0.0000036003585,0.008209783,3.5923313e-7,0.000008119822,0.9499002,0.00077430875,0.04031404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001570754,0.00061695726,0.0019846044,0.000071185175,0.00006427701,0.00017394633,0.13069181,0.00001723945,0.000048550613,0.40555328,0.45895675,0.00025063317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001945477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013397315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5443469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003283284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000447921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81114155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603695401","doi":"","title":"Conflicts Research on Overseas Forensics of Civil and Commercial Matters","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Convention; Law; Business","score_opus":0.13401910218218327,"score_gpt":0.4109650608676636,"score_spread":0.27694595868548033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603695401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13820308,0.000015241302,0.000015697395,0.020478506,0.00030573364,0.00017977232,0.000014709177,0.0000141786895,0.84077305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658746,0.000009757052,0.000020136416,0.002829062,0.00025263018,0.0000027132849,4.652111e-7,0.0000042091997,0.0002935712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796385,0.0001816257,0.00010470106,0.00023748864,0.0008521608,0.00066017656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987004,0.000268202,0.000038772487,0.000116091964,0.00027817982,0.00059834844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033354303,0.00006206268,0.00011679269,0.00019119463,0.0021947555,0.00012707264,0.0004312679,0.000070551825,0.000076769946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069342164,0.000066150074,0.000026426387,0.00079083315,0.005600904,0.00020310184,0.000046302433,0.00015826977,0.000018775645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073123083,0.000005011715,0.0027108844,0.000008263874,0.0000012978771,0.0000026148102,0.0139428545,3.6948657e-7,0.00012382986,0.95324916,0.01799431,0.011954112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118937955,0.00008082503,0.023381554,0.00003884288,0.000005280228,4.4733625e-7,0.012212534,0.00001727364,0.00011320163,0.0053849304,0.95849466,0.00015153806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22399053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6046851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94786423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035371113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090255495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604669359","doi":"10.71781/2394","title":"L'obligation d'information à échelle d'intensité variable: vers une théorisation de l'obligation de conseil","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Business; Supreme court; Political science; Meaning (existential); Philosophy","score_opus":0.008433672464596347,"score_gpt":0.19654621901297561,"score_spread":0.18811254654837928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604669359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8709103,0.0041228305,0.007642746,0.005138464,0.0031721594,0.00094258395,0.000102617596,0.00029795832,0.10767035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574665,0.0028947163,0.002599885,0.0004966984,0.0004734752,0.000051767223,0.0014290928,0.000034315286,0.03455354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613315,0.00043500026,0.0007799867,0.0005760104,0.0012311265,0.0008447538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965945,0.0003600534,0.0009813547,0.00036623533,0.0011433738,0.0005544824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079200295,0.00054879446,0.00048123614,0.0004293003,0.013462188,0.00018898446,0.0005214293,0.0010032499,0.00009104378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052987476,0.0007094349,0.00032482503,0.001289802,0.00080398686,0.002643077,0.00008731331,0.0006554675,0.00024596127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021462662,0.00038276252,0.013650669,0.0006609818,0.0004985431,0.0006898993,0.57042783,0.030656561,0.02799397,0.32362047,0.01509142,0.014180618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024847197,0.00039510502,0.07334483,0.001596142,0.0014785101,0.0015655314,0.37403074,0.025529359,0.019219585,0.0072108335,0.49109948,0.0020451688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40957084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019643744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47600806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01739164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012121767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604749233","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1236","title":"Arbitrary Disproportionality: A New Charter Standard for Measuring the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Sentences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Jurisprudence; Constitutionality; Hearsay; Law; Sentence; Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11462601037613666,"score_gpt":0.3716684552670683,"score_spread":0.25704244489093164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604749233","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020539625,0.7114866,0.0049036196,0.176077,0.0032988065,0.006282713,0.0005608868,0.00019169958,0.07665909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98198074,0.013285399,0.0005600954,0.002931088,0.00076328526,0.000079025995,0.00001752231,0.000008227584,0.00037462343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981755,0.00021632329,0.00041920025,0.00016821423,0.0006932173,0.00032756018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988908,0.0002595387,0.00019083629,0.00023069799,0.00025426768,0.00017382437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037242481,0.000114389426,0.0003136753,0.000009871274,0.00048583883,0.00002871092,0.0002942792,0.00004374369,0.00048066847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038878885,0.00007748579,0.00021580733,0.00010718406,0.00086931285,0.00045259434,0.00003909235,0.00009051432,0.000018497201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027408609,0.000042773037,0.0040284325,0.0013595177,0.0000411562,4.573222e-7,0.0005102667,9.7278466e-8,0.000023855904,0.97006285,0.022014579,0.0018885911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009460802,0.000017210758,0.000875176,0.0016171915,0.00017641256,0.0000032565454,0.0002312742,5.563712e-7,0.00007736055,0.00566106,0.9911327,0.00011324046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011626467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010304311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96911806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055169698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005044468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5262983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604866233","doi":"","title":"Chapter 9, Canada - Electronic Evidence in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Digital evidence; Computer security; Electronic signature; Computer science; Data science; World Wide Web; Political science; Digital forensics; Geography","score_opus":0.027419474247809144,"score_gpt":0.2788139767553629,"score_spread":0.25139450250755374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604866233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518092,0.027602307,0.00009119085,0.014888354,0.0008589268,0.00016208949,0.0000015282442,0.000011640841,0.0045747254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880025,0.009649746,0.0000052741143,0.00046577724,0.00053127686,0.0000043310943,4.0198603e-7,0.000012386589,0.0013283511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344534,0.00017591905,0.00028597316,0.00016016698,0.0007887097,0.0051438645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991819,0.00019353013,0.00012201779,0.00013471524,0.00007376421,0.00029405314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030969798,0.00014440427,0.00017820337,0.000052614665,0.00046360338,0.00004110594,0.00048142043,0.0000450619,0.00023702878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029760096,0.00013906839,0.0000457022,0.00022974108,0.00005608585,0.0006854847,0.000030093506,0.0016010449,0.00001166937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006001052,0.000027936825,0.17618254,0.00000782446,0.000045963767,0.000023932964,0.0013903584,0.00003296559,0.00005908773,0.7996436,0.0016158541,0.020909935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078220974,0.00028871757,0.051543016,0.0003717956,0.000118963595,0.0006824583,0.08812108,0.000044909084,0.00018215326,0.08039281,0.7759233,0.001548585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99990094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7743074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022264887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09521106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98148847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606825656","doi":"","title":"Can There Be Too Much Context In Administrative Law? Setting the Standard of Review in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Supreme court; Standard of review; Legislature; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Categorical variable; Administrative law; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09236820952006088,"score_gpt":0.4289437835473409,"score_spread":0.33657557402728006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606825656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10032936,0.0035628178,0.0000022123606,0.29299954,0.000091786176,0.0007676303,0.00004869401,0.000015339905,0.6021826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941691,0.00036030952,0.000037083264,0.0044863895,0.000040712865,0.000022465389,0.0000026246844,0.0000064290807,0.0008748577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982536,0.00060221425,0.00025195238,0.00019471483,0.000296665,0.00040084642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886686,0.0005305984,0.00012454939,0.00019308939,0.00010832297,0.00017656454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002097846,0.00011551585,0.00028680166,0.000022977953,0.00026454654,0.000043826727,0.00030290868,0.00006626592,0.00019821312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006350593,0.000089151,0.000046962432,0.00025145442,0.0005657154,0.00010091433,0.000020472278,0.00021451942,0.0000051364586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024823483,0.000011928778,0.0012809295,0.000098910794,0.0000050920903,0.000016258628,0.070993945,6.141198e-7,0.000009366042,0.9236873,0.0023824633,0.0014883659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022811837,0.00028085822,0.0011324688,0.0017643115,0.000022246944,0.000002138261,0.18529436,0.000005925962,0.0004478136,0.0033726476,0.80722016,0.00022895055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9016032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99901026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92031467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002541821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012587708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3635472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607008568","doi":"","title":"The Sacred Fire: The Legacy of Antonio Lamer (Chief Justice of Canada)/Le Feu Sacré : L’Héritage D’Antonio Lamer, Juge En Chef Du Canada (French)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.007044087770493533,"score_gpt":0.23539502441093266,"score_spread":0.22835093664043912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607008568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50542897,0.22013946,0.00018409804,0.2501802,0.0041088304,0.00056071696,0.000070117996,0.000021337482,0.019306237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92512167,0.060766265,0.000017202492,0.00058657036,0.0011242419,0.0000029905736,0.0000022796903,0.000023109107,0.0123556955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260026,0.00091168965,0.00094420044,0.00035416646,0.0016370938,0.0035525637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967395,0.0011823677,0.0008645136,0.0004887852,0.00042180633,0.0003030243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004898963,0.00038685897,0.0005600634,0.000035952547,0.0025907806,0.00016761667,0.0017880584,0.00017239607,0.00011244876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008573503,0.0002735113,0.00025079568,0.00073399476,0.00086524663,0.00054596225,0.00008390034,0.0024106754,0.0000025609836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000184102,0.00027473216,0.00042550883,0.00009068565,0.0005006653,0.00007001072,0.005449613,0.0002734416,0.00058402313,0.84981054,0.063734,0.07860266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009474087,0.0007935565,0.004246682,0.0003026247,0.00083675643,0.00045477893,0.061284654,0.00035172538,0.0005964675,0.037504368,0.89198923,0.00069177634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8282552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031151415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06867227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608382484","doi":"","title":"L'autonomie du droit de la consommation","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008303390300457765,"score_gpt":0.20983722850112543,"score_spread":0.20153383820066767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608382484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8276845,0.007827633,0.0018182416,0.10922533,0.0003153849,0.00019417686,0.000010741263,0.00012786304,0.052796114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98862815,0.0032254816,0.0007231833,0.0011982261,0.00044357756,0.0000016919336,0.0000046686387,0.000016022528,0.005759026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791056,0.00053527503,0.00023756638,0.00037793748,0.00032358489,0.0006151043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998163,0.0008825722,0.00017401065,0.00029412273,0.00008717842,0.00039914585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076745474,0.0002444106,0.00029173124,0.00012221231,0.0011849473,0.00011639319,0.00057137007,0.00022670349,0.0008069062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021756717,0.00031088394,0.00023492001,0.00035785657,0.0010794426,0.0008207038,0.000098029515,0.00034579495,0.000581271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011491169,0.0002255777,0.0015904541,0.000027801878,0.000044446526,0.00033881617,0.23208514,0.00024391293,0.00017558462,0.5387187,0.011938365,0.21449628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010527673,0.00036354654,0.064154625,0.00020603088,0.0004353921,0.00016622338,0.075642616,0.004180034,0.00005932838,0.06930756,0.7837287,0.000703186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57016265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44155458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7717903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012788005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011347373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623190492","doi":"","title":"IMPAIRED EXCLUSION: EXPLORING THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW BRIGHT LINE RULE OF GOOD FAITH IN IMPAIRED DRIVING OFFENCES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Good faith; Economic Justice; Faith; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.1319890253518243,"score_gpt":0.35276777740927345,"score_spread":0.22077875205744915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623190492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.850459,0.108267985,0.000018857796,0.0011415608,0.00042100358,0.0010312413,0.0000125336055,0.000034472418,0.038613383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95115733,0.048533365,0.00009076855,0.00007989244,0.00007727228,0.000017482096,0.0000026937923,0.000006712014,0.00003450677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978815,0.0001988593,0.0008762051,0.0002559825,0.00048266895,0.00030483902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987794,0.000106714266,0.00047591075,0.00036175136,0.00013568372,0.0001405244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023119706,0.00016775179,0.000615896,0.000028592873,0.00020968918,0.000012469232,0.00046042612,0.000046897883,0.00007621951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010022981,0.00009791172,0.00019099357,0.0003459613,0.00075138255,0.0005000993,0.0001786554,0.00015144475,0.0000014559806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007492424,0.00040194066,0.008639455,0.010215955,0.000031844025,0.0000023458874,0.022240104,1.7236347e-7,0.00009075327,0.81343985,0.00007709095,0.14478558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002506347,0.001822257,0.1942231,0.17302327,0.00078785204,0.00002315226,0.013138845,0.00004173721,0.011202229,0.050317995,0.5511951,0.0017181016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05279723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026209753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76312184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006014608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017122159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W163065817","doi":"","title":"Chatterjee v. Ontario: Property, Crime and Civil Proceedings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Chatterjee; Constitutionality; Legislation; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Ultra vires; Political science","score_opus":0.01769299269155882,"score_gpt":0.2755887227359524,"score_spread":0.2578957300443936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163065817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81070936,0.0024273822,0.00013177657,0.041527856,0.00020653191,0.00026417014,2.6303368e-7,0.00007673458,0.14465596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738331,0.0018329176,0.000036991038,0.00050954625,0.00039244682,0.00000168958,1.6127403e-7,0.0000062514364,0.023386901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975594,0.000027493488,0.00016004285,0.00017907795,0.00035212206,0.0017218144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959826,0.000014734849,0.00008054411,0.000047711535,0.00010899195,0.00014977562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001705692,0.00010951314,0.00013293918,0.00005366269,0.00075066765,0.00023070618,0.00024643049,0.00006654868,0.00010483091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007280506,0.00007785356,0.000052612242,0.00010649362,0.00011064125,0.0005525547,0.000018702904,0.0010294935,0.000022094671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010679539,0.000109365996,0.01095637,0.000008263937,0.000041612908,0.000010519314,0.021465532,3.1046898e-7,0.0009036459,0.88239425,0.0044743507,0.07952897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055408507,0.0012160153,0.022960788,0.000115973715,0.0000786018,0.0006008387,0.015479635,0.0000050771714,0.00007687401,0.63225776,0.32620528,0.00044907496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021807266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31041425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32173094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009901565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023078038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16363319","doi":"10.29173/alr325","title":"Taking Measure of the Charter’s Equality Guarantee: A Comment on the Court of Appeal’s Ruling in Morrow v. Zhang","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Minor (academic); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; High Court; History","score_opus":0.09682964536252264,"score_gpt":0.36413324369650113,"score_spread":0.2673035983339785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16363319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043634724,0.051641554,0.00001643454,0.7416585,0.0003062675,0.0022993295,0.000006316285,0.000015906198,0.16042097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759753,0.00577465,0.000007988233,0.018127227,0.000034764664,0.000012369412,5.186631e-7,0.000003806101,0.000063430256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804926,0.00066325156,0.00043340056,0.00015068812,0.00048526376,0.00021814638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985822,0.0005636802,0.00036000952,0.0003971061,0.00006999904,0.000027010346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028559926,0.00010366873,0.0003455077,0.000009806912,0.00021755551,0.0000152525745,0.000537328,0.00004086491,0.00010145244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006590387,0.000058259306,0.00016250677,0.00027031646,0.00019249668,0.00008186082,0.00003476721,0.0001546715,0.000009305045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010870761,0.000096710544,0.0004047423,0.0005212613,0.000010065332,6.274681e-7,0.004701435,0.0000033264446,0.000081977865,0.9823868,0.0018567061,0.009925445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029361443,0.0001477961,0.003978226,0.0477239,0.00019793837,0.0000028367624,0.0013839885,0.0000480171,0.00059358106,0.004892817,0.94039434,0.0003429252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036869813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030177685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004833776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053588014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1655023742","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1116","title":"The Common Law Confessions Rule in the Charter Era: Current Law and Future Directions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Interrogation; Supreme court; Law; Suspect; Charter; Political science; Jury; Exclusionary rule; Rule of law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Common law; Due process; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Sources of law","score_opus":0.062391836377596155,"score_gpt":0.3610520596228769,"score_spread":0.29866022324528074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1655023742","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003668063,0.59465927,0.0000015836381,0.18272448,0.001235069,0.0011192263,0.000019610312,0.00006626986,0.21650642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41658226,0.5753039,0.000010294517,0.007258224,0.00054500083,0.00010735852,0.000005460289,0.000007735946,0.00017977365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982493,0.0006271391,0.00026599303,0.0001927584,0.0003616624,0.00030315178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908566,0.00035279544,0.0000696185,0.0003232717,0.000079730875,0.00008891544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012479844,0.0001261447,0.00024158829,0.0000073508427,0.0030245367,0.00009223403,0.00037275974,0.00005091846,0.000115461684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000316444,0.00006880193,0.000096625816,0.0001903077,0.0009766152,0.00022684815,0.00005240386,0.00034978945,0.000056277382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022405106,0.000041087595,0.00013340943,0.0001213796,0.0000042875745,0.0000048671886,0.0022072247,2.3083023e-8,0.0000012697566,0.97688776,0.012895976,0.0077004763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005864339,0.0000105737045,0.000624374,0.00083878456,0.000038750673,0.000014812914,0.0004719759,6.9050066e-7,0.0000012096867,0.0033511692,0.99448985,0.00009916461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061241807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07108444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98159385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033917993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062725936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1661077792","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.1948","title":"Aboriginal Gaming Challenges in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11295550669460834,"score_gpt":0.3270983709033963,"score_spread":0.21414286420878792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661077792","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32311028,0.50819236,0.0000031090021,0.023491716,0.00062098296,0.00032918085,0.0000063715593,0.000024926036,0.14422108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5608117,0.43771586,0.00010649043,0.0011468066,0.00010197804,0.000008406302,9.872067e-7,0.0000052762166,0.00010250623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992858,0.000054871765,0.00019432178,0.00017257819,0.00005707734,0.00023531898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959075,0.00006551834,0.000058524587,0.00010097762,0.00002367306,0.00016057852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008454852,0.000076162345,0.00023429231,0.000011926014,0.000097114695,0.000028915545,0.00012192676,0.000025504947,0.000017894019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395916,0.00007880848,0.000017566083,0.000037253012,0.00006850451,0.0002126622,0.000014563685,0.000071152805,0.000010368747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005484674,0.000013620602,0.0045207124,0.0009370383,0.000010247728,0.000021166716,0.0042610615,0.00001837016,3.9689442e-7,0.8947454,0.0018065403,0.09365994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061403895,0.000007122345,0.00042917635,0.00034204544,0.000016884973,0.0000041654416,0.0017091623,0.000013545202,0.0000010145828,0.00080361794,0.99649817,0.0001137036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9072872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040223842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007435133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32137164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662857842","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1238","title":"Assessing the Impact of the Ancillary Powers Doctrine on Three Decades of Charter Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Doctrine; Common law; Context (archaeology); Unavailability; Constitutional review; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0864488825808428,"score_gpt":0.4299096642051603,"score_spread":0.3434607816243175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662857842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5888234,0.29935974,0.000055391018,0.02354094,0.00095884426,0.0019150791,0.00002317739,0.00005192732,0.0852715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836479,0.015488724,0.000031374235,0.00060482393,0.00015891712,0.000008458704,5.2956864e-7,0.0000072889507,0.000051995612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820024,0.00033781686,0.00034022005,0.00013199182,0.00063659565,0.0003531513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864715,0.00034652752,0.00027168222,0.00048863434,0.00015568215,0.00009032116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026480886,0.00013155876,0.0003216287,0.000012730982,0.00032224372,0.00003699853,0.0006557638,0.000051281688,0.00030337545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000386708,0.00006337707,0.0003282895,0.0003160749,0.0005745134,0.0005026132,0.00007925892,0.00016807552,0.000022267592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056511395,0.00061593513,0.21870479,0.004544114,0.0002879978,0.00000486575,0.008327088,0.000020373931,0.003115152,0.66748196,0.046995636,0.049845587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020104513,0.00018670656,0.2048109,0.016314818,0.00042451307,0.000014223476,0.0005722142,0.000008702583,0.0013894038,0.0020320131,0.77360004,0.00044539824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025768413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052563363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7266044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007879595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017273054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38954306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1664654441","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1122","title":"Section 7 of the Charter and the Common Law Rules of Evidence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Supreme court; Charter; Statute; Precedent; Discretion; Public law","score_opus":0.1424107293925868,"score_gpt":0.35785681000866404,"score_spread":0.21544608061607723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1664654441","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22905816,0.5770153,0.000025213276,0.110473745,0.0010267555,0.0027876962,0.000019816714,0.000058786056,0.07953457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730403,0.125439,0.000016901784,0.0012049376,0.00007604283,0.000011968528,2.8032008e-7,0.000003401251,0.00020715974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985932,0.00050731143,0.0002792795,0.00011360328,0.00038249834,0.00012408328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989692,0.00040388035,0.00017015476,0.00029120364,0.00013273973,0.00003280731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001568882,0.0000729411,0.0002873497,0.000004937682,0.00047528907,0.000011001297,0.0003253218,0.000035662466,0.00008626903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018218205,0.000034779965,0.00012526632,0.00010969149,0.0020528655,0.0002126937,0.000066906636,0.000098800345,0.0000070551014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025318679,0.000022545151,0.0011585082,0.0014235049,0.000014937955,8.6444766e-7,0.0028034858,3.2543304e-7,0.00010125926,0.9889466,0.0038492135,0.0016534452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018407138,0.000041915588,0.0026750444,0.009809326,0.00019234791,0.000020030193,0.00017257541,0.0000052163186,0.00033475674,0.0070735677,0.9793701,0.00012105661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011500387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006442497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98187304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015751504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004769795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99508214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1683310909","doi":"","title":"Property on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Medicine; Geography; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06912450592017458,"score_gpt":0.3243551244564897,"score_spread":0.2552306185363151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1683310909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6415176,0.00060717924,4.6069152e-7,0.008361005,0.001203636,0.0006458153,0.0000100986545,0.00005745907,0.34759676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98762405,0.000035786587,0.0000226266,0.002917843,0.00076408015,0.00004518586,0.0000022929198,0.000010911159,0.008577227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840546,0.00024474825,0.00018943127,0.00018632955,0.00029403923,0.0006800243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987954,0.00019518918,0.00003978016,0.00020271898,0.000043802935,0.00072311534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010177543,0.00011067176,0.0001678914,0.0000614244,0.00045032083,0.00010532804,0.00024423198,0.000108051754,0.0010155418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088223285,0.0000826313,0.000055975514,0.00019051229,0.00018259499,0.000500492,0.000017640403,0.00020963981,0.0012651847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016647102,0.0002692623,0.024578227,0.000021740985,0.000013273842,0.00014902063,0.009529316,0.0000036471802,0.000031938802,0.9070225,0.04409479,0.012621592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014740642,0.00010750405,0.001810671,0.00006154229,0.0000070754886,0.000002608807,0.002417391,6.931161e-7,0.00006111176,0.00027701602,0.99361324,0.00016705829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94668627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9495185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038651147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044606585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1684499473","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1041","title":"The Constitutionalization of Solicitor-Client Privilege","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Charter; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04635053413305692,"score_gpt":0.34955141580249277,"score_spread":0.3032008816694359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1684499473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011510819,0.24699359,0.0011412072,0.018503487,0.0015147122,0.0015040623,0.000012528257,0.000072002054,0.7291073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81066555,0.18601827,0.00021347232,0.0016388318,0.00015599518,0.000043169486,0.000004695303,0.0000075288785,0.0012524849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873745,0.00030002024,0.0002704655,0.00011258459,0.00039739482,0.00018208557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992062,0.00020027168,0.000113548616,0.00019255289,0.0002254103,0.00006201285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015861847,0.000065664484,0.00015479836,0.000006321345,0.0005912288,0.000026304233,0.00020539734,0.00003142209,0.0002937202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075166463,0.000045777055,0.00008330527,0.00016220764,0.00066052185,0.00012360224,0.000015922462,0.000051471605,0.000060285034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.676113e-7,0.000013114091,0.00014151537,0.00019297044,0.0000046890827,3.9036314e-7,0.00009559899,0.0000013197836,0.000013755839,0.98804593,0.0110344365,0.00045542262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031688633,0.000008836206,0.000029143235,0.0009548356,0.000035001067,0.0000016010572,0.000058197573,0.0000011964785,0.000072547155,0.0039680796,0.9947809,0.00005796844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052897935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002478314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045870067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023246414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45473135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1697066185","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1202","title":"Grant, Suberu and Harrison: Detention, the Right to Counsel and a New Analysis under Section 24(2): Some Practical Impacts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Right to counsel; Discretion; Section (typography); Test (biology); Political science; Remand (court procedure); High Court; Statement (logic); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05872340611161409,"score_gpt":0.3696385201887816,"score_spread":0.31091511407716754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1697066185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2206938,0.15785559,0.0029763267,0.6035951,0.002294626,0.0032213156,0.000028110968,0.00023960494,0.009095532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91185564,0.07814866,0.00048020325,0.00775856,0.0006945455,0.000026933141,0.0000055725145,0.000013976536,0.0010158853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839485,0.00025259602,0.00027253307,0.00032649242,0.00044775696,0.0003057491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987562,0.00028485828,0.000106876374,0.00029031513,0.00016726257,0.0003945471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001987228,0.00014443797,0.0003354015,0.00003827843,0.00078091305,0.0002691618,0.00015589756,0.000092177426,0.00050063187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004533219,0.000096435055,0.00012821557,0.0005311189,0.00031328067,0.0006125219,0.000043848828,0.00027441906,0.00003884808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006007717,0.00010828056,0.004205057,0.0008733963,0.00044299805,0.00002197925,0.0026960347,0.0000022115396,0.0011733461,0.8677716,0.116560005,0.0060849665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090981644,0.00003706788,0.0037653567,0.00028724398,0.0012861086,0.000027005824,0.00011921701,0.000011484671,0.000021211,0.005761917,0.9884212,0.00017120731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091135185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11239263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8718612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003199721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015393057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1702021691","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Canadian Legislation and Case Law: Prince Edward Island","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.38526012086536093,"score_gpt":0.5019600754959659,"score_spread":0.11669995463060495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1702021691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004269659,0.0017351883,0.00005874645,0.024267422,0.0007581481,0.0006589087,0.000091415175,0.00009688469,0.96806365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15926422,0.010970661,0.024751924,0.0038131005,0.0071647307,0.00015053796,0.000120456374,0.00014522986,0.79361916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488306,0.0020066882,0.00043765825,0.0006488861,0.0008253402,0.0011983919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497986,0.0027293053,0.000113390604,0.00051037944,0.00078829617,0.00087876344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018306423,0.00027045567,0.0003415756,0.0003303995,0.0021572968,0.0008143583,0.00067156425,0.0018170013,0.0010197157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007789456,0.00025456876,0.000081105696,0.00041667905,0.0013687345,0.00047543467,0.00015027002,0.0023685424,0.00009000798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122380525,0.000013815427,0.00056346424,0.000120358294,0.000023566403,0.001215853,0.011853877,9.446819e-7,0.00002977161,0.11553656,0.8575586,0.013070956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006537035,0.000039847077,0.000043964432,0.00018692242,0.00003146394,0.00022380025,0.0039808964,0.000013597019,0.000042371536,0.018820228,0.97623235,0.0003191867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1744445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012387347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064443876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W170717355","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2465292","title":"LLAbolition Du Registre Des Armes DDDpaule: Le RRle Potentiel Des Principes Non crits (The Long-Gun Registry Case: The Potential Role of Unwritten Constitutional Principles)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012797075183093094,"score_gpt":0.2616013956093119,"score_spread":0.2488043204262188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W170717355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631352,0.004510129,0.017030725,0.0066652116,0.0002323094,0.00024388054,0.000008797252,0.00003519793,0.008138589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414086,0.0028791784,0.000115148374,0.00005957619,0.0009245323,0.000009549835,0.0000045686284,0.0000117178515,0.0018548605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967974,0.00046547077,0.00040913708,0.00024390378,0.0006337643,0.0014503639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858,0.00017685097,0.0003684906,0.00027914543,0.0004659883,0.00012957277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004036581,0.00017967513,0.00020636863,0.000053935295,0.0035141648,0.00021115375,0.0006671535,0.00011974107,0.000043384956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006732562,0.00012285853,0.00018933993,0.0002539405,0.0035083639,0.00045129,0.00008965021,0.00093036727,0.000011093674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008550765,0.00011655607,0.0058550304,0.000030988493,0.00009623911,0.00005708829,0.0016750529,0.000478574,0.0006286172,0.9743263,0.00019504748,0.016454993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012492568,0.00046287256,0.020929169,0.00037630094,0.00043006218,0.020732632,0.116562575,0.00082346855,0.0014149544,0.75563455,0.08072361,0.00066057534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005496788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02804005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21869178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004975749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032563184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1711771721","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1217","title":"The Interrogation Trilogy and the Protections for Interrogated Suspects in Canadian Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Trilogy; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.08277040635567212,"score_gpt":0.3438659246500198,"score_spread":0.2610955182943477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1711771721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008510005,0.14793578,0.00019760472,0.2833307,0.0020340804,0.01657317,0.00003152005,0.0001658513,0.54122126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98926085,0.008360525,0.000035866207,0.0015900218,0.0000581285,0.00037478874,0.000001951595,0.000006254788,0.00031161556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885774,0.00036283807,0.00022721835,0.0001439003,0.00010190171,0.0003064223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992871,0.00026107524,0.00006505724,0.00016635809,0.00011617011,0.00010421257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024807726,0.000076612574,0.0001678959,0.000017195192,0.0009197147,0.00005786863,0.000258723,0.000044446475,0.00008498858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003849364,0.000045116132,0.00006369377,0.0001584458,0.000782338,0.00014938701,0.00002465799,0.00012142684,0.000014177863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023491802,0.0000050100934,0.000019410803,0.000092133014,0.000006156003,8.202219e-7,0.0030413424,2.7731454e-8,9.2640744e-7,0.9948407,0.0006561218,0.0013139024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021013127,0.00003553437,0.000052988686,0.000708307,0.00004210164,0.000003334831,0.0013315572,0.000016197428,0.000011158028,0.01863597,0.9788846,0.00006814128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82049066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98075086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015883935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022843952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70737946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722558755","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1279","title":"The Death of Oakes: Time for a Rights-Specific Approach?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Set (abstract data type); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06730119988863748,"score_gpt":0.3259241155007634,"score_spread":0.2586229156121259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722558755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044230255,0.29328266,0.0005644995,0.016042272,0.00031319022,0.004706403,0.000019836405,0.00009923031,0.6845296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6110195,0.33101898,0.011023127,0.003773337,0.001748638,0.0024554043,0.000052286585,0.00009349758,0.03881525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859196,0.00017899905,0.00033952395,0.00020340411,0.0003601365,0.00032598877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986945,0.0004170905,0.00013231608,0.0003561312,0.00030017956,0.00009977486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014798439,0.000113161725,0.00030673068,0.000008470075,0.0007159093,0.0000803508,0.0005405817,0.00005007059,0.0007706789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013695164,0.00006795325,0.00019955561,0.0001097826,0.00039027337,0.00022255347,0.000032549346,0.00007109766,0.00042726778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030376,0.000023979528,0.00000852978,0.00041424856,0.0000107612805,1.5163255e-7,0.0001884888,1.1985578e-7,0.000019712938,0.93397063,0.06176855,0.0035918122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005174284,0.0000264933,0.000015993302,0.00072038226,0.0000449428,9.206229e-7,0.000065372864,0.000012498514,0.000016310067,0.018356927,0.98059165,0.00009674632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030687146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002673107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9188231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039681883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006192654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8438394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1723956093","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1214","title":"What Happens at a Bail Hearing Anyway?: The Supreme Court's Troubling Retreat from the Openness Principle in Toronto Star v. Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Charter; Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Deference; Context (archaeology); Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10462871659499695,"score_gpt":0.3336438235793268,"score_spread":0.22901510698432986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1723956093","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26540515,0.5683716,0.00001582646,0.09328274,0.0030453105,0.004534931,0.00009805069,0.00014902612,0.06509737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87290967,0.12053899,0.00012332782,0.0047686794,0.00030982975,0.00010695743,0.000019880928,0.000035581845,0.0011871101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638414,0.0006805542,0.00062598195,0.0005578661,0.00096321705,0.0007882212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978242,0.00057951454,0.00020403235,0.00096159393,0.000199674,0.00023099458],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003096706,0.00030295877,0.00057938474,0.000008467619,0.0012673524,0.0003081712,0.0015086948,0.00009610592,0.0033126918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037011702,0.00019152065,0.00016491485,0.000244778,0.00035624046,0.0014676078,0.00042535466,0.00030937383,0.00005948906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045045503,0.00041746808,0.04317772,0.002507415,0.000401536,0.00045535323,0.06966671,0.000012344266,0.00022207348,0.740274,0.123333596,0.019081319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017004776,0.000024895919,0.0036123856,0.004178813,0.00012017681,0.000004540228,0.0059682783,0.000019282332,0.000039742103,0.0003566705,0.98520213,0.00030306273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99939245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8618685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016545564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007333711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1737600285","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720120801.586","title":"The Development of Criminal Litigation Legislation Since the Founding of P.R.C.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07624792978885428,"score_gpt":0.3488322464516246,"score_spread":0.2725843166627703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1737600285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412269,0.0002992197,0.00035207102,0.007865809,0.0013340893,0.00031054474,0.0000037936516,0.000012660954,0.24859488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993164,0.000007147032,0.00021082042,0.000050648756,0.00026681926,0.0000048429793,3.6264743e-7,0.0000019586405,0.00014103297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986451,0.00008114101,0.00018342903,0.00008410096,0.00056676957,0.00043944642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992138,0.00018553057,0.00012834655,0.0000835549,0.0002106074,0.00017817062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036699977,0.00004441324,0.00005846596,0.00004568853,0.003951761,0.00007103808,0.00048118056,0.000031901454,0.000014588834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005111674,0.000031159423,0.000026777278,0.00060814014,0.0022171866,0.00048294992,0.000024421359,0.000057497884,0.000005481583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025284746,0.0000055334763,0.010219793,0.000006196954,0.0000021603082,7.747809e-8,0.15333997,3.5939985e-7,0.0010146806,0.8002912,0.00027111245,0.034846395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006557784,0.000016668826,0.16256934,0.000055365726,0.000029426277,6.962702e-7,0.19475804,0.000021643667,0.0038040292,0.0023314855,0.63613933,0.00020837001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031248724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1858607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7979597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045336926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020999487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1740233832","doi":"","title":"Rounding Up the Usual Criminal Suspects, and a Few More Civil Ones: Section 7 After \"Chaoulli\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Vagueness; Criminal law; Section (typography); Arbitrariness; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01978160009590462,"score_gpt":0.3204070949783039,"score_spread":0.30062549488239926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1740233832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814293,0.0057158745,0.003906508,0.0046469113,0.00089281314,0.00013637144,5.4267105e-7,0.00003697547,0.0032347075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059194,0.003937572,0.000019467934,0.00020778904,0.0021096286,0.000004020325,4.2432976e-7,0.000013916671,0.0031152493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967779,0.0001547789,0.00024198522,0.00021104826,0.00054800045,0.0020663098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993144,0.00019828894,0.000121781166,0.000109604756,0.000104189305,0.00015170062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005760303,0.00014324987,0.00013784332,0.0000925635,0.0014988881,0.00027478783,0.00024681614,0.00010257315,0.00009755339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001757213,0.00010625437,0.00009376035,0.000252567,0.00030220076,0.0004666464,0.00003921941,0.0014514256,0.0000109603625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009922233,0.00012413031,0.020303363,0.000045385987,0.00019387093,0.00011267516,0.083941385,0.000009803398,0.0006057915,0.8176816,0.0008358748,0.07515389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011938104,0.0009831771,0.045612246,0.00025666703,0.0004959602,0.0031827746,0.66338855,0.000044109598,0.00019000746,0.18265407,0.10110173,0.00089687255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026730201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11790948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6350275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011205676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010839162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1741046706","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1201","title":"“Detention” under the Charter after R. v. Grant and R. v. Suberu","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Political science; Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Remand (court procedure); Psychology","score_opus":0.035084537543816165,"score_gpt":0.3195177534237348,"score_spread":0.2844332158799186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1741046706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15088768,0.2973418,0.00014363059,0.4366459,0.0031684851,0.0028379697,0.000026229738,0.00024068734,0.10870762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951738,0.038506396,0.000056333458,0.0077151256,0.0002955697,0.000069612564,0.0000017839473,0.000009836604,0.0016073484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885666,0.00015526588,0.0001936792,0.0002098064,0.00032185033,0.00026276364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932414,0.00010199454,0.00005090406,0.00030691197,0.00010256775,0.000113499824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013174353,0.000106894484,0.00018497015,0.000008262402,0.0004855454,0.00010711236,0.00023771469,0.00005733314,0.0017676515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066686225,0.00006714506,0.00010334741,0.00010114131,0.0005885937,0.00024269195,0.000052068117,0.00021376289,0.00023967886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010438073,0.00003979792,0.0009831499,0.00071316044,0.000024193921,0.00001022771,0.00090437254,3.0638077e-8,0.00024715046,0.9657496,0.020526016,0.010791828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044337194,0.000009360537,0.0024298276,0.00051153125,0.000082946484,0.000007882409,0.00009947928,7.942005e-7,0.00000860525,0.0040366706,0.9926585,0.000110049594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015886882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01779602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000114338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042313117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174738811","doi":"","title":"Finnish Criminal Policy from the 1960’s and Beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal investigation; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04545636650670786,"score_gpt":0.3531117476113966,"score_spread":0.3076553811046887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174738811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8832319,0.002679464,0.0003240421,0.09297459,0.00080677925,0.00012693231,0.0000103301045,0.000016245285,0.019829746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930601,0.00053739885,0.0013605285,0.0021881338,0.0023813157,0.0000015191146,4.0496576e-7,0.000009848889,0.00046076687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983142,0.00027030564,0.0003163695,0.000102044934,0.00059445255,0.0004026463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998293,0.0007833151,0.00032615178,0.00015944253,0.00010707937,0.0003310121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015352439,0.00011685879,0.00020539525,0.00008147272,0.0005751272,0.00013014625,0.00039907484,0.00007680445,0.0001146914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010274583,0.00007820656,0.000116718285,0.00018756883,0.0003510599,0.0004979628,0.000058330592,0.00040418262,0.000031340776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046534016,0.0007271047,0.11493477,0.000021760028,0.00021912914,0.0000555041,0.20735377,0.000015877275,0.0013761097,0.26029912,0.30336586,0.11116566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068598066,0.00029960563,0.102963075,0.000108105676,0.00027926886,0.000048123493,0.04605109,0.0000061919036,0.00031496797,0.004803724,0.8441596,0.00028025813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027426705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004057228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5407938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011912879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002955158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44234714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751803832","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1172","title":"A More Lasting Comfort?: The Politics of Minimum Sentences, the Rule of Law and R. v. Ferguson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.056072567626597764,"score_gpt":0.3494054192767731,"score_spread":0.2933328516501753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1751803832","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09123498,0.4431798,0.000042973617,0.30398065,0.00038522415,0.0020841565,0.000058394315,0.00007654237,0.1589573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689972,0.024807477,0.000108432185,0.005650735,0.000103372,0.0000054256366,0.0000016359868,0.000004898815,0.00032086537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986589,0.0001899754,0.00035289023,0.00013410643,0.00041761153,0.00024652362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989856,0.0003446085,0.00018959136,0.0002633175,0.0001529018,0.000063971434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450938,0.000100675075,0.00030101702,0.00000678541,0.00048376078,0.000028515176,0.0003892583,0.00003837105,0.000037600887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002136056,0.00005587858,0.00010151015,0.00014603513,0.00081000855,0.000119633856,0.000050213144,0.00011003987,0.0000024811789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003836941,0.000032060936,0.0002749265,0.00075770915,0.0000124049575,0.00000170714,0.0028358935,8.4177105e-7,0.00006913738,0.99142027,0.002335072,0.0022561701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008238128,0.00007946714,0.00046319276,0.00421929,0.00019618988,0.000008667132,0.0015236489,0.000021410617,0.00013696191,0.007949879,0.98519105,0.00012783628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008083044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027576964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024722183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000711093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175225971","doi":"","title":"Attaquer une décision en révision judiciaire (Challenging Administrative Decisions on Judicial Review)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Humanities; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047646981294231484,"score_gpt":0.37652056200066264,"score_spread":0.32887358070643113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175225971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046057913,0.38122126,0.023876632,0.46872497,0.0062116045,0.001024757,0.000013748564,0.00012818677,0.07274092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62384534,0.36759654,0.00009227592,0.0011995718,0.0023776588,0.0000055729274,0.0000030523267,0.00003226158,0.004847745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171585,0.0016765255,0.00092022086,0.0006202618,0.0015025041,0.0035646458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648744,0.0018184778,0.000528338,0.00038245984,0.0003239536,0.0004593415],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010240109,0.0004539078,0.0006919209,0.00016118887,0.002115875,0.00011722842,0.00084736856,0.00035972588,0.0003764912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028420552,0.0004094452,0.0004873388,0.0008355676,0.0004495148,0.00059063116,0.00010680441,0.004009521,0.00089351076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001026442,0.00016352504,0.00002888502,0.00003665088,0.000061934756,0.0000191506,0.001213245,0.00004635291,0.000024538918,0.57178634,0.0071153403,0.41940138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000579374,0.0030106877,0.00043799143,0.01121806,0.00035830098,0.00034388364,0.00703827,0.0002079598,0.00002703999,0.4865113,0.4896356,0.00063156727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017759346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012692563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5777874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023133247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031265556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1754226533","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1024","title":"Constitutional Casualties of September 11: Limiting the Legacy of the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Statute; Conviction; Law; Political science; Presumption; Presumption of innocence","score_opus":0.098687175941766,"score_gpt":0.3428456381365486,"score_spread":0.2441584621947826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1754226533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11460571,0.26028073,0.000039610244,0.06366384,0.0014945245,0.0018260302,0.000043530574,0.00006756204,0.55797845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838352,0.01450641,0.000030076248,0.0008678274,0.0001229305,0.000009069124,7.0571537e-7,0.0000035914707,0.00062415825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998387,0.00033520302,0.00038807784,0.00013425299,0.00054593955,0.00020952435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988794,0.00031831124,0.00024932934,0.00030467368,0.0002057505,0.00004256687],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011756456,0.00010055133,0.00029332103,0.000006589679,0.00050999504,0.000030146011,0.00048240012,0.000043733347,0.001169172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004017739,0.000057082238,0.00022272309,0.00020829448,0.002226877,0.00028858735,0.000079534664,0.0001256986,0.000041557916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014801587,0.000055463883,0.004008313,0.001266711,0.000028849041,0.0000025958757,0.0017810293,0.0000053552844,0.00007464246,0.96701247,0.023433357,0.0023297565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049249185,0.000009382782,0.0005321382,0.00303377,0.0001102954,0.000008229277,0.00049466634,0.000007611556,0.00014194794,0.0002504583,0.9952784,0.00008381031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016911983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019190139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029864363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009247372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764206910","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1113","title":"Arbitrary Detention: Whither — or Wither?: Section 9","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Prima facie; Charter; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Test (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.09843138157882267,"score_gpt":0.3471047990116318,"score_spread":0.24867341743280916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764206910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018951753,0.20907775,0.00041914714,0.03617977,0.0022959935,0.0020927403,0.000010094812,0.0005973321,0.7303754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61995226,0.3314728,0.0010712842,0.011834414,0.0019521993,0.00012630782,0.000011057068,0.000049533057,0.03353015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855006,0.00023375759,0.00025664296,0.00023896906,0.00044359374,0.00027699728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993469,0.000062414474,0.00008545854,0.00024262341,0.00013480615,0.00012777612],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071486755,0.00012322541,0.00025322475,0.000014966849,0.00072013476,0.000030757576,0.00023330092,0.00007147118,0.0039196885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010574089,0.00009418472,0.00013739022,0.00027981482,0.00031393688,0.0004126881,0.000024893408,0.00014092553,0.00042508024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022174827,0.00050758215,0.0052329265,0.006001142,0.00017299071,0.0004707486,0.0055869864,0.0000027043102,0.0002800553,0.43604028,0.5091189,0.03636393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007190686,0.000046027308,0.00030049912,0.0015377903,0.000057795158,0.000050515573,0.000079016,0.0000010772982,0.00001673635,0.0005066714,0.9971815,0.00015048673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022549974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006870469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6968453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066305016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001789783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767010817","doi":"","title":"'The Melancholy Truth': Corrective and Equitable Justice for Omar Khadr","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Harm; Law; Constructive trust; Sociology; Appeal; Order (exchange); Proposition; Government (linguistics); Principal (computer security); Faith; Repatriation; Law and economics; Remedial education; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; History; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056058050570153686,"score_gpt":0.38319732613740065,"score_spread":0.327139275567247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767010817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6689311,0.09421959,0.0048633963,0.08141429,0.021235613,0.001183354,0.000028527207,0.00010981011,0.12801431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937181,0.0027820289,0.0004464161,0.00021166955,0.0010854023,0.000006636768,9.129741e-8,0.000008300546,0.001741386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987353,0.00015391901,0.00030093643,0.00011235069,0.00035430555,0.00034320122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567646,0.0032616416,0.00028703717,0.000074333664,0.000600265,0.00010028424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030305122,0.00010025969,0.00028043461,0.000032788223,0.0020648944,0.0001667444,0.0002336735,0.00003827157,0.0000031634381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058694575,0.000064511376,0.00008861356,0.00010282626,0.00046988775,0.00039112577,0.00007632168,0.00015658113,0.000002822033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011987359,0.0001287652,0.0018186067,0.00026836066,0.0007474053,0.000040121853,0.06710765,0.000078655365,0.0002590055,0.6352127,0.15796871,0.13517126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048446574,0.0005186899,0.0009824712,0.00010914919,0.00037117835,0.000028492927,0.052489195,0.00003539479,0.00006949747,0.01243908,0.932331,0.00014137826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028344613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016175174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77436227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073009265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087900444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767433710","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1194","title":"Supreme Court Recognizes (a Derivative) Right to Access Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Access to information; Constitutional right; Right to privacy; Information access","score_opus":0.05450529070080008,"score_gpt":0.36725654651546313,"score_spread":0.31275125581466307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767433710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036545526,0.015612849,0.0019452155,0.25676018,0.005894785,0.006814913,0.00013244683,0.0008772232,0.6754169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9017666,0.046850435,0.004403242,0.042429984,0.001481582,0.00043326052,0.000120117045,0.00005898506,0.0024557924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757266,0.00021473477,0.00059446984,0.00029718617,0.00078068994,0.00054024794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980357,0.00022626341,0.00020614064,0.0004818798,0.0006682874,0.00038170352],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021228478,0.00023333267,0.00044543215,0.000059489208,0.00075260364,0.00040664317,0.0010763697,0.00013532609,0.004434514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013118259,0.00020261621,0.00015621769,0.0005392428,0.00030152933,0.003072751,0.00018836612,0.00034817928,0.0017099463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004822049,0.00011906681,0.0012608782,0.0029314144,0.00006013362,0.000012648614,0.00422405,0.0000020426764,0.00071999116,0.4630945,0.46840245,0.05912462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009313319,0.000030681145,0.0003829727,0.0014325187,0.000068170986,0.0000042090633,0.00008831704,0.0000028141535,0.000454558,0.0019448964,0.995196,0.00030176624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00463058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019314442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8652211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081072605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002418061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778929457","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1237","title":"Charter Protection against Unlawful Police Action: Less Black and White Than It Seems","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Tort; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1360243581166527,"score_gpt":0.36688718135446763,"score_spread":0.23086282323781493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778929457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2181549,0.11016909,0.0004874633,0.21045226,0.0034760346,0.006680512,0.000036325804,0.00062447245,0.44991893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92917895,0.06393853,0.000036617603,0.003593837,0.0010570574,0.00006565356,0.0000046332725,0.000015767167,0.0021089436],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984036,0.0002788262,0.0002512449,0.00023561931,0.00038166455,0.00044903855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923223,0.000037421545,0.00011630249,0.00024186897,0.0001247819,0.00024739292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012789803,0.00015920644,0.00027627847,0.000020753176,0.0004798084,0.00008291716,0.00017461063,0.00009435026,0.0002709121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051960087,0.00014031198,0.000094003495,0.00021457644,0.00031983698,0.0008897555,0.000048254566,0.00017698477,0.00031062495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015218514,0.00084109453,0.018873729,0.0313243,0.00031163235,0.000015110653,0.090070456,0.000006057935,0.0024275887,0.31935486,0.18758848,0.3490345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065962646,0.000022732007,0.0011129788,0.0018227757,0.00007240186,0.0000067899,0.0012212856,0.0000047119556,0.000043647753,0.00007443459,0.99535275,0.00019955546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006131529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013670754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80776423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086474836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000492917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92690784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1783575409","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1275","title":"R. v. Khawaja: At the Limits of Fundamental Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Statute; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.09481146920036855,"score_gpt":0.3702600371720951,"score_spread":0.27544856797172657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1783575409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035268698,0.37249783,0.000013408924,0.13232945,0.0011060566,0.002530706,0.000021368769,0.00009767755,0.45613483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8791007,0.10590552,0.00009299185,0.006321204,0.00024855614,0.00007850588,0.000004874981,0.000012868679,0.008234811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851847,0.0002427213,0.0002959162,0.00017498565,0.00048315385,0.0002847609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897075,0.00029002724,0.00012896911,0.00031890636,0.00018296647,0.000108379005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093488867,0.00010548857,0.00025207168,0.000007179299,0.00055003027,0.000041951407,0.0004354745,0.00004289045,0.005322939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025546423,0.00006925779,0.00013705004,0.00016635936,0.00057327235,0.00026427925,0.00009237738,0.00009692864,0.001410449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007854967,0.000087659195,0.00081169617,0.003862536,0.000040088908,0.000004078952,0.0016716438,8.9222397e-7,0.00046748616,0.5448387,0.4347397,0.013467622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004217354,0.000024222254,0.00036236012,0.0012725837,0.00018974429,0.0000029601076,0.0003920479,0.0000012140429,0.000067471716,0.0005240182,0.997026,0.00009517826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066959537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053605153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84383196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080369085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070700946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785708482","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1229","title":"The Constitution of Criminal Justice in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Psychology","score_opus":0.0695485440875672,"score_gpt":0.3494029155400848,"score_spread":0.27985437145251757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785708482","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017078908,0.62866694,0.000046725352,0.020609444,0.0025728035,0.0010032924,0.000013765845,0.000022914135,0.3299852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94320685,0.05564544,0.000032492404,0.00090611714,0.000112539055,0.000010234646,9.102133e-7,0.0000019294644,0.000083490064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988217,0.00020860498,0.00025093768,0.000073132986,0.00035104988,0.00029459345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992877,0.00029603404,0.000081929415,0.00014772148,0.0000962228,0.00009038525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015841112,0.000059815455,0.00016105612,0.0000054254706,0.00030266476,0.000010534672,0.00022239352,0.000019396879,0.0001248584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048257242,0.000042808442,0.00003643701,0.00013347092,0.00032414362,0.0001886431,0.000024050782,0.00008399939,0.000017232887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037350665,0.000011582179,0.0010969923,0.0011441496,0.0000029368477,0.0000018191292,0.00038552,6.6655116e-7,0.0000063467483,0.9846969,0.008722823,0.0039265035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027350014,0.0000042221873,0.00053511077,0.0012088419,0.00014641027,0.0000022317631,0.0011715845,0.0000010774971,0.000018136085,0.00011571031,0.9967086,0.00006076641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98798573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024514593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010781244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23278832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1788573043","doi":"10.22459/fpwt.07.2008.04","title":"Protecting Constitutionalism in Treacherous Times: Why ‘Rights’ Don’t Matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ANU Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08120039955318752,"score_gpt":0.2998857787756909,"score_spread":0.21868537922250336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1788573043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032056923,0.00074101443,0.000026629152,0.0002138731,0.00023488251,0.0006802367,0.000014364699,0.00008567608,0.99768275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019685324,0.000088876164,0.00011074353,0.0005176605,0.00055153645,0.00007664697,0.00000946049,0.00002859443,0.9789311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998172,0.00010992694,0.00036194452,0.0004603539,0.0005010742,0.0003947271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916923,0.00018128906,0.00018702306,0.0002787227,0.000066203385,0.000117560274],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003644613,0.0002909361,0.00035491967,0.000099992096,0.0005228161,0.00009710647,0.00036759512,0.00045291943,0.0006226346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002959161,0.0002776175,0.00014227942,0.000008471844,0.0009548236,0.00013788049,0.000080590704,0.0006255211,0.00020265183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087157205,0.000045202625,0.00003633885,0.00014312164,0.00009824893,0.00074295833,0.058042057,0.000004864996,0.000022793407,0.8296698,0.10399564,0.007111836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014551694,0.000018401763,0.0000048415627,0.00046014346,0.000033644592,0.000027312659,0.00007053067,0.0000011174991,0.000049002647,0.04281767,0.9560145,0.0003573255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092058495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009413384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85201883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016948901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021750975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792534912","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1111","title":"The Limits of Privacy: Some Reflections on Section 8 of the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Supreme court; Dignity; Charter; Warrant; Law; Jurisprudence; Normative; Autonomy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Right to privacy; Trespass; Sociology; Law and economics; Business","score_opus":0.1565261154772932,"score_gpt":0.39212240396100967,"score_spread":0.23559628848371647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792534912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14171888,0.18573207,0.00004162286,0.26676193,0.006290907,0.0044916426,0.000031325257,0.00018838563,0.39474326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8978667,0.09945356,0.000013892877,0.0010066263,0.00023626913,0.000021246045,4.474361e-7,0.000005815122,0.0013954057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987796,0.00027656974,0.00026373498,0.00011578801,0.00040705758,0.00015727532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990983,0.00018792163,0.00016141763,0.0003571776,0.00015882132,0.000036347392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077372044,0.00006980906,0.00017518798,0.0000091284155,0.00090922427,0.000009102027,0.00035707332,0.00003964328,0.000063008636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003106591,0.000038740887,0.00016204496,0.00024136908,0.0004947647,0.00013630709,0.000030471858,0.00012413529,0.000022968268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001980837,0.000109407134,0.00031902207,0.00069174246,0.000034182754,0.0000010068512,0.003233857,0.0000029158189,0.0008851421,0.9544017,0.036829524,0.0034716937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000336672,0.000048081147,0.000856833,0.0012294636,0.00004179677,0.000003396994,0.000062806146,6.119778e-7,0.00045994422,0.0011548852,0.99605876,0.000049759656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000925984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019469078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95922923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004193075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011064855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.699311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1793832989","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.3092","title":"Vie privée et surveillance ambiante : le droit canadien en chantier","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01498176929965302,"score_gpt":0.29450981758482325,"score_spread":0.27952804828517025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1793832989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6222776,0.012737962,0.00015361937,0.19480263,0.0032187842,0.0010144045,0.00017594021,0.0001767049,0.16544233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8801514,0.0028796764,0.00022822114,0.0027342346,0.00055762235,0.00004938594,0.00003048176,0.000028781877,0.113340214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706846,0.00056316104,0.0003509343,0.0005532726,0.0005464573,0.0009176913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986201,0.00021672793,0.00017149393,0.00034826124,0.00023834304,0.00040505614],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010659684,0.00030011515,0.00040424356,0.00003804411,0.000515351,0.00036553654,0.00067062036,0.0003020973,0.0010255825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037262094,0.00030163288,0.00018557801,0.00040965865,0.0005810474,0.0010134003,0.00013162075,0.00043792688,0.0010495974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013405874,0.00014614273,0.0071912566,0.00012986548,0.00007952758,0.00006851063,0.03821119,0.00003711439,0.00051838486,0.75364745,0.18944849,0.010508633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023905185,0.00009937079,0.06735861,0.000232254,0.000032386197,0.00003282104,0.00836329,0.00011711147,0.0001593867,0.0214119,0.90134436,0.0006094642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47948563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60745525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73223555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002635284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041030304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179477543","doi":"10.29173/alr316","title":"Negligent Investigation: A New Remedy for the Wrongly Accused: Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Economic Justice; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Accountability; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.10715983637272868,"score_gpt":0.34417589197099463,"score_spread":0.23701605559826594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179477543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019837974,0.35543615,0.000126927,0.5498013,0.0016237261,0.006887714,0.000015118461,0.00022332907,0.06604775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15843847,0.60482895,0.0013437434,0.1874544,0.0044615576,0.0006666703,0.00008553735,0.00009224543,0.04262842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979937,0.00023250454,0.00043816355,0.00036139946,0.00053799123,0.00043625577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974961,0.0012630483,0.00024161628,0.00050058926,0.00016576124,0.00033286217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007357906,0.0001995468,0.00033490444,0.000015790543,0.0013213748,0.00007562639,0.0007659897,0.00008221182,0.00021259692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015444071,0.00014020379,0.00024776632,0.0003546217,0.0004371864,0.0004416306,0.000055651217,0.00013056253,0.00018473077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033482826,0.000050411254,0.0015432745,0.0017513199,0.0000990766,0.0000036421056,0.029528927,0.0000060962684,0.0000081275075,0.57772666,0.38052693,0.008722026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011877594,0.000031241263,0.0004280501,0.0014511686,0.00014714923,0.000011236422,0.00027670513,0.000012604668,0.0000072964044,0.00065052655,0.9966747,0.00019050675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42162532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45445248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6161478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074527044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037750503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796572108","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511979170","title":"Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Statutory law; Discretion; Political science; Law; Sentence; Sentencing guidelines; Criminology; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04085265482509632,"score_gpt":0.2358256628848379,"score_spread":0.19497300805974158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796572108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004481595,0.00014207017,0.00006941464,0.00004810426,0.00018401025,0.00024525073,0.000027496,0.00007907106,0.99472296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005756764,0.0002908249,0.000047717207,0.000039023842,0.00016491232,4.114933e-7,0.000030380166,0.000011450536,0.99365854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990654,0.00009193247,0.00009727534,0.00029338768,0.00024732455,0.00020469805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931914,0.00007622344,0.00016289669,0.00015764423,0.00014094674,0.00014316605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019299179,0.00014167308,0.00016275968,0.00007844746,0.00068869523,0.00004043045,0.00020229258,0.00024777482,0.0000059955123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003227623,0.00017957298,0.00006592025,0.000010207105,0.00045029478,0.00015722829,0.00017310778,0.0001644163,0.000011772667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043627544,0.0000038715584,0.000034751556,0.00008983852,0.000025816893,0.00006136066,0.0026767505,1.2950322e-7,0.00006855723,0.8647548,0.13005896,0.0021815333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111241854,0.0000165914,0.00010747977,0.00019032312,0.000118781936,0.000003088721,0.0006713839,0.0000053259023,0.00014445557,0.000032941054,0.99839383,0.00020454398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059270645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005663934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8683349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005280569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022501695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8959988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1797370817","doi":"","title":"Speaking Truth to Power? The Search for Bureaucratic Independence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Political science; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Politics; Independence (probability theory); Public administration; Separation of powers; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03190676826214824,"score_gpt":0.3574533647320147,"score_spread":0.3255465964698665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1797370817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8023062,0.0038586557,0.049796533,0.12113914,0.0009982917,0.00105225,0.0000031204445,0.00008711917,0.020758688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590725,0.00050569215,0.00028154984,0.00047025288,0.0010581304,0.000009537333,2.078453e-7,0.000011471642,0.0017559312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966842,0.00015068293,0.00019525252,0.00017093183,0.00063157966,0.002167352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991553,0.00033247485,0.000063265,0.00013822403,0.00016469197,0.00014607748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061603896,0.00009632346,0.00011160563,0.000059186004,0.0013425539,0.0002212978,0.0006626003,0.00006127042,0.00007876399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041307285,0.00006811041,0.00010097422,0.00023118968,0.00009858859,0.00032435157,0.00003760865,0.0010503972,0.0000856143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062926694,0.000025695113,0.00019855368,0.0000025987645,0.000027918253,0.0000014267656,0.01079853,0.00015588105,0.00017315581,0.9034207,0.0004701475,0.084662504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079208304,0.0013783599,0.00097514305,0.00014068479,0.0001108447,0.00035357114,0.18123928,0.00021836883,0.00068575237,0.36012447,0.4533219,0.0006595348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010842589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03241241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5432962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009763374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025720121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798478995","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1114","title":"Investigative Detention: A Search/Seizure by Any Other Name?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Charter; Constitution; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Supreme court; Duty; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.11004978399148793,"score_gpt":0.3543688446054809,"score_spread":0.24431906061399297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798478995","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026788702,0.5881741,0.00018694812,0.11135205,0.0005676178,0.0024155066,0.00008382485,0.00040120984,0.27003005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7341433,0.22824869,0.0008961178,0.018273171,0.00055084564,0.00011935019,0.000022752385,0.000050042094,0.017695712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978819,0.00046176772,0.00027837078,0.0003057303,0.0006599343,0.000412296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.00009395256,0.0000816483,0.00027313665,0.00021969713,0.00027752967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010111547,0.00015282637,0.00032021248,0.000014220584,0.0007943084,0.00004161751,0.00038245175,0.000079212594,0.002133322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002452426,0.00013398811,0.00015722397,0.0002880378,0.001309295,0.0003789994,0.000052772397,0.00019602092,0.0007639691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011210262,0.0001433737,0.0015004473,0.001629321,0.00006135446,0.00006817096,0.004837259,6.233792e-7,0.00034995825,0.3263678,0.66109306,0.003937418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071176786,0.00003762552,0.00008054598,0.0018486422,0.00004377048,0.000011479813,0.0001442011,0.0000014146365,0.000104190076,0.0010893539,0.9963905,0.00017709738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055174106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002365191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008949218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022762275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798632713","doi":"","title":"Cost of Admission: One Rubber Stamp - Evaluating the Significance of Investigative Necessity in Wiretap Authorizations after R v Araujo","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Authorization; Legislature; Political science; Judicial deference; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.20227030998609552,"score_gpt":0.424135452960932,"score_spread":0.2218651429748365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798632713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831765,0.002376909,0.000089073794,0.01293981,0.00019359698,0.00035229858,0.0000067124433,0.0000045488473,0.0008605467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818623,0.00038561597,0.00085340696,0.000116574534,0.00012953684,0.000022070073,2.182952e-7,0.000005760853,0.00030055828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997695,0.0005263903,0.00068548473,0.000112829846,0.0007757214,0.00020453834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715805,0.00075067335,0.0007820275,0.000114026625,0.0010929322,0.00010226669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131422,0.00010708444,0.0004027314,0.00006994853,0.00027335912,0.00004112504,0.00029909477,0.0000459998,0.00010971525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003001216,0.000070516224,0.00008990227,0.00045884345,0.0011334415,0.0006318929,0.00009043614,0.00026164413,0.0000029612183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072832097,0.0009423363,0.18897848,0.00058487186,0.00078669935,0.000052092517,0.72417426,0.0021224215,0.027400201,0.02209778,0.0075594652,0.024573106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001259857,0.0015105364,0.7474136,0.0034588287,0.0005179905,0.000009020806,0.19671747,0.00027817884,0.010002433,0.029261854,0.009003554,0.0005666869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029970484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027746572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55843514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095372525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004365152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45306605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798828826","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139962964.004","title":"Enough About Me: Why Privacy is About Power, not Consent (or Harm)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Internet privacy; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07493607685941893,"score_gpt":0.2876754027174099,"score_spread":0.21273932585799094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798828826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026039456,0.0003435985,0.0003324698,0.0013233497,0.0008032717,0.0006959792,0.0003905623,0.00022730768,0.99562305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009457755,0.0012277671,0.0000959013,0.0019511041,0.00042673873,0.0000014994505,0.000021560185,0.000055927176,0.98676175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969924,0.00017013852,0.00034579245,0.0008808663,0.00090422004,0.0007065799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973491,0.00045741958,0.0004327184,0.00083747855,0.00039987642,0.00052342017],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044044727,0.0005386984,0.0006896555,0.00016730925,0.0011154868,0.0002197375,0.0014434152,0.0006674653,0.00029481098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013482374,0.0005851733,0.00042532483,0.000018769484,0.0013897247,0.00018898443,0.0005810027,0.0006447841,0.00018741153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002132383,0.0000103851935,0.0000019887623,0.00009922324,0.00008355428,0.00023357292,0.0023012632,2.0789693e-7,0.000019997564,0.6796952,0.31655595,0.0007854514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046567633,0.00008743373,0.000020685593,0.0005679857,0.0003246044,0.000010110788,0.00046325053,0.0000037131476,0.00021645229,0.000025555442,0.9970851,0.0007294413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006682062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024934267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6805292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044905164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007974142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798911260","doi":"10.22230/jem.2013v14n2a550","title":"Social Licence in British Columbia: Some Implications for Energy Development","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecosystems and Management","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Stakeholder; Public land; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03152348958817935,"score_gpt":0.2923900465774794,"score_spread":0.26086655698930006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798911260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781378,0.0012556986,0.0015467287,0.012878288,0.00051877415,0.0008285842,0.0000030072504,0.000014367291,0.00481676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960064,0.0008609609,0.00067782507,0.00015407788,0.00024260838,0.00008921664,5.3253456e-7,0.000003857728,0.0019645111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992536,0.00003198731,0.00032676436,0.0000865431,0.00012890561,0.00017220713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.000038474307,0.00017581927,0.000034142406,0.00011315682,0.000070180286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005386416,0.00003570225,0.00013368635,0.000040235554,0.0003530574,0.00035020275,0.00013462536,0.00003148925,0.000029215138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015823756,0.000048978443,0.000037356738,0.000074647534,0.000027481381,0.00034381152,0.00003206246,0.00003260337,0.0000018713962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122583115,0.0003448608,0.039081257,0.0005326283,0.00016474898,0.000028884744,0.007685496,0.0000069698076,0.00009113051,0.23554908,0.38361806,0.33288464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033216548,0.000038032907,0.15018444,0.00019611378,0.000018153509,0.0000085798,0.0049412344,0.00001198035,0.0000014755008,0.005774401,0.8383865,0.000106938336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028715832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40245825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45476842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010625825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005016509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97775203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1800409070","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1039","title":"Constitutional Recognition of the Role of the Attoney General in Criminal Prosecutions: Krieger V. Law Society of Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05106941723125123,"score_gpt":0.31780788623837236,"score_spread":0.2667384690071211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1800409070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20273109,0.15754324,0.00005726191,0.020319888,0.001217279,0.005267189,0.0002324941,0.000030779815,0.6126008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906882,0.007839999,0.00028953882,0.0008470055,0.000035184046,0.00003306918,0.0000042271727,0.0000036396657,0.000259102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983144,0.00044350978,0.00046226868,0.000149523,0.00045229073,0.00017801773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999027,0.00014755745,0.00025084955,0.00025280664,0.00028631723,0.00003547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011374115,0.00009349544,0.00027030837,0.000004510872,0.00025192302,0.0000076917195,0.00030324285,0.00006780201,0.00029617205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034238145,0.000060249713,0.0002937168,0.00029052133,0.0024346432,0.00015727403,0.000046540274,0.0001286358,0.0000055098785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003702662,0.000072780225,0.0013121845,0.0006415369,0.0000112353455,6.5920254e-8,0.0007378582,0.0000025799702,0.0005216795,0.9957281,0.00067361066,0.00029466907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019687192,0.000026106833,0.000596898,0.0062299054,0.00024497774,0.0000072635944,0.000689063,0.000007722314,0.008074333,0.027084798,0.9566825,0.00015958726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121156275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012667675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056751338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036911597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803760762","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2015.04.10","title":"The Standard of Proof for Redressing Wrongful Convictions - A Comparative Study with Case Analyses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Internal medicine; Medicine; Cardiology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3794452175175761,"score_gpt":0.5165660732146613,"score_spread":0.1371208556970852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1803760762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905721,0.0007037603,0.0016533635,0.0060579963,0.00042565845,0.00014609017,0.000007443931,0.0000030678555,0.00043052353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992463,0.000044093045,0.00042040308,0.000043796867,0.00018028173,0.0000069626994,5.855687e-7,0.0000022139973,0.00005533684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893975,0.0003629476,0.00029774845,0.00007964919,0.00019877033,0.00012110303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970519,0.0009979195,0.00037617507,0.00004731643,0.0014673275,0.000059372727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010558482,0.000059006583,0.00023383043,0.0000684952,0.00035160725,0.000025398449,0.0001970862,0.0000635055,0.0000057765174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004641639,0.00003632691,0.000047182075,0.000013307018,0.0016418415,0.0001390878,0.000026180544,0.00014229878,1.9812958e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0112297265,0.0005122761,0.01782903,0.000013233625,0.002254379,0.0010316217,0.4837419,0.0003303831,0.00019305303,0.4725398,0.0034459508,0.006878615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046223653,0.011460408,0.00457669,0.00007199475,0.0007804257,0.003469229,0.7712175,0.000084142805,0.0005738902,0.17269416,0.030223453,0.00022569695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002595881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009241586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29984564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059548624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003593757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60494334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815604866","doi":"","title":"Unreasonable Interpretations of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Statutory interpretation; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Tribunal; Administrative law; Judicial deference; Ambiguity; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Discretion; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014297814811347943,"score_gpt":0.30914821541209275,"score_spread":0.2948504006007448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815604866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21690623,0.0030281805,0.044227283,0.017400803,0.00068545685,0.00018174904,0.0000017673202,0.000071657734,0.7174969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629104,0.000628896,0.00009986045,0.00010127329,0.00017867188,0.0000010754853,2.8913513e-7,0.0000044094386,0.0026944592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854726,0.00014119821,0.00013914816,0.00006814713,0.00021995192,0.0008842776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956614,0.00011868464,0.000085935455,0.00006927466,0.00009832926,0.00006165516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022299748,0.000045028395,0.0000876239,0.000028215401,0.00036996085,0.00003448124,0.0002211722,0.000033371554,0.00007326905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022842006,0.000040938885,0.00006500497,0.000088156376,0.00016363786,0.00021958996,0.000012440778,0.0004184457,0.000026413656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075668827,0.000013988806,0.00021747968,0.0000018480421,0.000011697431,1.3353423e-7,0.0014211822,0.000008329844,0.00006754537,0.99067223,0.000083566825,0.0074944235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119157216,0.00015355952,0.00010032554,0.000033465833,0.0000270014,0.000021078786,0.005836339,0.00004367154,0.0000872069,0.8347769,0.15872505,0.00007624764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036200883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029295623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77938485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023534677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009075369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823843837","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Independence for Administrative Bodies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Mandate; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Politics; Law; Administrative law; Legislature; Accountability; Separation of powers; Commission; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06059992443973244,"score_gpt":0.3610446900196423,"score_spread":0.30044476557990984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1823843837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88338566,0.026273983,0.009151984,0.033652585,0.001101578,0.00093550887,0.000011280851,0.000061415965,0.04542599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813171,0.012150776,0.00005585244,0.000020393487,0.0001883662,0.0000074762916,1.7719515e-7,0.000004246076,0.006255617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815935,0.00009330229,0.00018225689,0.000085420295,0.00035888262,0.0011207806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991246,0.0003804157,0.00015034959,0.00007595445,0.00021518422,0.00005350134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024082714,0.000060930583,0.0000976829,0.000019300913,0.0021435278,0.000031118085,0.0003558126,0.00004680491,0.0000095635005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005400312,0.000041937365,0.00009389745,0.00006768526,0.0004719071,0.00018896561,0.0000144117075,0.0005173307,0.000004193102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009925951,0.000028675675,0.0017440495,0.0000033786537,0.000045001005,0.000002094,0.0069592576,0.0000022214087,0.000101772035,0.98258543,0.0005984061,0.007830427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003907245,0.00085821905,0.0015048151,0.00003930788,0.000043151977,0.00018767822,0.08554277,0.0000073310403,0.001060304,0.7634449,0.1467226,0.0001981734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004831186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034368783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21914053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023673192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037798653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824540343","doi":"","title":"Prosecutorial Independence and Accountability in Terrorism Prosecutions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Cabinet (room); Accountability; Political science; Law; Independence (probability theory); Convention; Discretion; Legislature; Supreme court","score_opus":0.012075812730335452,"score_gpt":0.3197479915505157,"score_spread":0.3076721788201802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824540343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99351364,0.00025067304,0.00010151957,0.0027047514,0.00092631433,0.00019972982,9.82617e-7,0.000021795177,0.0022806122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979225,0.0005630803,0.000054820022,0.000028843111,0.00093531463,0.000010466551,3.4862597e-7,0.000005843008,0.00047878543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975899,0.00012016428,0.00020941297,0.00019989473,0.00041069766,0.0014699487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.00007604104,0.00007940909,0.000113771515,0.00010046011,0.00011412482],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050184596,0.000090504494,0.00011674043,0.00006836519,0.0005809583,0.00014468683,0.0002699321,0.00015912642,0.00004701177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005070846,0.00008297832,0.000038486418,0.00018765988,0.00029277438,0.0005980961,0.000038357302,0.0029096003,0.000009778105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011446697,0.00012929151,0.07143652,0.0000070320357,0.00001245981,0.000006126512,0.013914597,8.172811e-7,0.002514535,0.8937002,0.000057966838,0.018106004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007822399,0.00023123817,0.034155574,0.000034683635,0.000027053193,0.0002695614,0.03794435,0.00001557728,0.00010147412,0.89354044,0.032532,0.0003657937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008165286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31161493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30344963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046906678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003293382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824946498","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130904.2572","title":"Feasibility of the Application of Common Law Double Tier Model in China from the Burden of Proof Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Perspective (graphical); Constitution; Law; China; Proof of concept; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.041315491627256506,"score_gpt":0.3338449230779411,"score_spread":0.2925294314506846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824946498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87824625,0.000038466143,0.00001902994,0.008003276,0.000045216402,0.0006390088,0.000028335882,0.000002613383,0.112977825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997691,0.0000013708637,0.000028729677,0.00006950614,0.00005116253,0.000016940881,3.3475143e-7,0.0000019941258,0.000060874903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989521,0.00007855581,0.00016510434,0.00017011105,0.00041151524,0.00022260922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924463,0.000055539364,0.00012934562,0.00021885111,0.00026047914,0.00009113001],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008444288,0.00004882962,0.000120636,0.000023943707,0.00051874766,0.00002391586,0.00087953935,0.00005034639,0.000027256223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009671164,0.000033829645,0.000046521323,0.0006958424,0.0033896104,0.00024982807,0.000051579354,0.00009312001,0.0000014346073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007773911,0.000026750917,0.026459446,0.0000060459474,0.0000021245037,5.358594e-8,0.13283241,0.00012633519,0.0019047987,0.8373955,0.00021230854,0.0010264616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047902562,0.000039875136,0.36908218,0.00009303418,0.000036939742,1.552522e-7,0.216396,0.0068657477,0.004475965,0.4004804,0.0017317891,0.00031891433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9709786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8452727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4369151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051625026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011388084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1826707174","doi":"10.7202/1032675ar","title":"Propriété intellectuelle, Cour suprême du Canada et droit civil","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04597333529863941,"score_gpt":0.2884160321260291,"score_spread":0.24244269682738973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1826707174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01795739,0.007724583,0.00015116,0.10014688,0.012525526,0.00026107178,0.00008801303,0.000045499513,0.8610999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97512466,0.0014480009,0.0002113519,0.0021235277,0.0018552656,0.0000037682164,0.000001969261,0.000033265907,0.019198187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959979,0.0006993456,0.0005821857,0.00032134136,0.0014771678,0.000922041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971553,0.00035519726,0.00029113286,0.0002186209,0.00073087896,0.0012488331],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029423733,0.00028972578,0.00039817282,0.000044058706,0.0035352292,0.00026415358,0.00070148415,0.00018736848,0.002281019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008835291,0.0002792772,0.00016598878,0.00039067605,0.0006433392,0.00078935566,0.00013954255,0.0009622988,0.0002836041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099359786,0.00015441845,0.00028939347,0.00004006793,0.00007561818,0.001023386,0.0027530214,0.00020482599,0.0000064067967,0.75580233,0.23010552,0.0094456365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004156269,0.00021507384,0.000045940364,0.0002056155,0.000085530075,0.0012172536,0.004610829,0.00014096776,0.000087172186,0.0091120275,0.9834959,0.00036807932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9411667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95716727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018720508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013545606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1844365475","doi":"","title":"Wolfenden in Canada: within and beyond official discoursein law reform struggles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03621148058030124,"score_gpt":0.28091988510024996,"score_spread":0.2447084045199487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1844365475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27788892,0.0033195335,0.0000057157326,0.0007749927,0.000800421,0.0019935856,0.00019851375,0.000028586306,0.7149897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751694,0.0016483319,0.0005270007,0.00005660789,0.00006018161,0.0000016909343,0.0000072018693,0.000022696162,0.022506855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972749,0.00008987,0.00084048224,0.00046241502,0.0009433097,0.00038903308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735796,0.00016659716,0.0012756822,0.00042500455,0.0005199674,0.00025479117],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052432175,0.00038987762,0.0014727178,0.00021414613,0.00057423284,0.000009967062,0.0007220951,0.00017365743,0.00003481744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007559324,0.00042041132,0.00011344532,0.00006506401,0.002290307,0.00039193121,0.0005038089,0.000560749,0.0000019304052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021135265,0.000390313,0.003759529,0.0016744304,0.0012795951,0.00043058675,0.060770676,0.0005613814,0.00003427955,0.9032499,0.0017519661,0.023983823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006613901,0.002320311,0.007309302,0.004872422,0.0009778833,0.0000062479576,0.67117393,0.0000061000183,0.00008383429,0.021512518,0.28321874,0.0019048064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93556285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99763554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88173735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016545458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003179695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853133962","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Canadian Legislation and Case Law: Federal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.5680596685653162,"score_gpt":0.5417391408534766,"score_spread":0.02632052771183957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853133962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040763365,0.001353174,0.000020993308,0.0326424,0.0007183177,0.000475872,0.000048003996,0.00009169652,0.9605732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19710054,0.0051408582,0.022964455,0.005144744,0.0068090283,0.000109462424,0.00010877718,0.00011717938,0.76250494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951313,0.0020698411,0.000378463,0.0005411647,0.0007255498,0.0011536524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955274,0.0023996856,0.000084123676,0.0003840066,0.0007149877,0.00088982354],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017427398,0.00023305157,0.00029206977,0.00029786953,0.0031228194,0.0011416627,0.0005311331,0.0018457348,0.001228798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070366925,0.00022400996,0.000079909194,0.00034329543,0.001221033,0.000459617,0.00010966591,0.002305946,0.000083354586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006661897,0.000008529989,0.00020563633,0.00005542258,0.00001462671,0.000969381,0.0074884803,3.5667819e-7,0.000022700102,0.14375196,0.83630955,0.011166687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053745018,0.000035179153,0.000029146864,0.00011991842,0.00001936361,0.00022081789,0.007129729,0.000012715876,0.00003137721,0.028653853,0.9634179,0.00027627172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99621034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19806825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013593015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062191254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853219717","doi":"10.4000/books.pur.16181","title":"Justice pénale et justice civile : réflexion sur l’indemnisation des victimes de violence sexuelle et conjugale au Québec","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses universitaires de Rennes eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05685297279825729,"score_gpt":0.2871953130655702,"score_spread":0.23034234026731293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853219717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05874649,0.0058796476,0.0037966445,0.005404766,0.00073037896,0.00068983436,0.00013715592,0.00033886,0.92427623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233187,0.008910408,0.0010342473,0.00048458288,0.0003808461,0.000011754666,0.000028699045,0.00008178076,0.065749004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962255,0.00064117456,0.00049429375,0.00086998066,0.00070348155,0.00106559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538857,0.0025305115,0.0005534212,0.00050164235,0.0004963279,0.00052954233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973968,0.0006955952,0.0006096815,0.00023005862,0.0022200337,0.00022519496,0.00094667554,0.0006779732,0.0013345667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045883915,0.00082228426,0.00032891816,0.000096882315,0.0021470208,0.0010204641,0.00040985778,0.0007444397,0.00022616133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004224121,0.0001973151,0.0022493226,0.0031281414,0.00034877422,0.00045822308,0.05269663,0.0025697513,0.000673099,0.8801725,0.004214274,0.052869588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018623259,0.0013070016,0.0031381613,0.013641867,0.013985386,0.000366125,0.040129535,0.00674113,0.0012126318,0.1351745,0.7781799,0.0042614522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17085125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25160068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86457217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023368245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028076554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1853419240","doi":"","title":"A New Conception of Wilful Blindness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R. v. Sansregret","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Blindness; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04023229177587528,"score_gpt":0.33328394300831143,"score_spread":0.29305165123243615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1853419240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811443,0.006448244,0.00004125264,0.008995808,0.00035953982,0.00010325863,0.0000055058185,0.0000027227493,0.0028993355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603504,0.0028428552,0.00021295666,0.000087981076,0.00022549265,6.2697507e-7,1.2212051e-7,0.000004388658,0.00059051666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980943,0.00014844924,0.0006101672,0.00008289443,0.0008643583,0.00019980183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985607,0.00052178296,0.00036785108,0.000097981734,0.0003765255,0.000075108044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012962308,0.00009150235,0.0003807257,0.000053831347,0.00019150876,0.000018955296,0.0003457168,0.00004088567,0.0001837866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005713449,0.000059241214,0.00009047275,0.00030185177,0.00032891394,0.00026845164,0.000029847,0.00017452714,8.7745445e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032446254,0.00047071045,0.06444832,0.00018566713,0.00060422375,0.00034017506,0.2234458,0.004082621,0.001077328,0.012940346,0.37100202,0.31815815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022986624,0.0010007136,0.10230573,0.0022175785,0.00027734382,0.000061779756,0.12080286,0.000033856944,0.0009957976,0.0065195737,0.76307195,0.00041414663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36024675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8320954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47184864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015476784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001155758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6440134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185378576","doi":"10.71781/23658","title":"Analyse des bornes extrêmes et le contrôle des armes à feu : l’effet de la Loi C-68 sur les homicides au Québec","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.06971092080218569,"score_gpt":0.38573603259340355,"score_spread":0.31602511179121784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185378576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477761,0.0068479287,0.00004142314,0.0015359481,0.00031962516,0.00047003792,0.000060519505,0.000008158944,0.04294029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584994,0.0010465211,0.0040734936,0.000046216457,0.0002481214,0.000055196222,0.0001373506,0.000046869838,0.035846848],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648845,0.0010209816,0.0005723579,0.0007207401,0.0003987511,0.0007986979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996261,0.0022194567,0.00046114382,0.00035195315,0.00036033703,0.00034610165],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027671398,0.0005098039,0.00076952775,0.00012572944,0.0022427444,0.0013697062,0.0014202514,0.0006900653,0.003147864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001799594,0.00049122097,0.000308157,0.0003718632,0.0027510303,0.0013554756,0.00016451055,0.0006111978,0.00030985518],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003501793,0.000506314,0.1513826,0.00026118822,0.00023918542,0.00008581907,0.1533616,0.00007504511,0.015354707,0.0034923966,0.00058742776,0.67430353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009266197,0.00023002298,0.37697226,0.0019199944,0.0010085783,0.000033917215,0.25829074,0.00010760135,0.035447177,0.0032440287,0.32039246,0.0014265995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93555534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67287695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044349083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061348123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860163611","doi":"10.7202/1032677ar","title":"Le Tribunal des droits de la personne devant la Cour d’appel du Québec : appel à plus de déférence","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03809411854686967,"score_gpt":0.30329950606908723,"score_spread":0.26520538752221756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860163611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43240282,0.015042313,0.0028502392,0.051305592,0.0017330294,0.0002657133,0.00011144092,0.00012505607,0.4961638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913205,0.0010695657,0.0019133941,0.0004350613,0.0011969995,0.0000068702707,0.0000012584557,0.000037654005,0.004018731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954608,0.001625045,0.0004935192,0.00034563866,0.0008470242,0.0012279433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696505,0.0007126269,0.0002987876,0.0001814703,0.00044157752,0.0014005109],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057615293,0.00032408582,0.000430674,0.000064068954,0.0054648696,0.00044666673,0.0007809406,0.0003420763,0.00031553925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00114057,0.0003242764,0.00028196746,0.00028370897,0.0026826845,0.00094845786,0.00013923469,0.0009865898,0.00025988554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024556223,0.0003697092,0.0037353812,0.000092926064,0.00009265341,0.0018222197,0.017826376,0.00088247337,0.0001245054,0.9548123,0.008657148,0.011338737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011709085,0.0002289141,0.00072289683,0.00052535575,0.00016595669,0.005901035,0.015580317,0.0011630388,0.00020475504,0.016127016,0.95776504,0.0004447662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3702812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42028347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019911414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027551127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1862935854","doi":"","title":"Damages as a Remedy Against Administrative Authorities: An Area Needing Clarification","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Administrative law; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.06673185567348285,"score_gpt":0.384419086557641,"score_spread":0.3176872308841582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1862935854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87196475,0.0016850218,0.003361951,0.031917542,0.00035930646,0.00025664782,0.00000210332,0.00014269214,0.09031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916796,0.0039218822,0.00016706866,0.00032300918,0.00073686586,0.0000026659332,0.000003724023,0.000007744302,0.0031574508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972358,0.0002540122,0.00025021302,0.00020983217,0.00047795125,0.0015721996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992425,0.000073873605,0.00016580123,0.00013099218,0.00017627564,0.00021058989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032858807,0.00012636688,0.0001421883,0.000088443034,0.0012582256,0.00025542692,0.00036972124,0.00012135807,0.0000459002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041851922,0.00012215099,0.00007868915,0.00024363145,0.0001373802,0.00095492986,0.00000802969,0.0013130887,0.000021971902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049093556,0.000056375662,0.00019525994,0.0000014148521,0.000015776764,0.000009049342,0.009350125,0.0000046933183,0.0011279566,0.9494589,0.00019903526,0.039532315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030651718,0.001688583,0.0016121026,0.00009346047,0.00005631345,0.00013202119,0.27923495,0.000061264625,0.00029886168,0.6753743,0.040755343,0.00038627206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044900202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005031743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2740846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009072231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034966748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96773815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1866902775","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1085","title":"Knowledge is Power: The Criminal Law, Openness and Privacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Jurisprudence; Democracy; Supreme court; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Openness to experience; Separation of powers; State police; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Sociology; Constitution; Computer science; Law enforcement; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.07694085382770983,"score_gpt":0.3821765624806582,"score_spread":0.30523570865294836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1866902775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006018861,0.44331026,0.000019766698,0.13556288,0.00033221452,0.0010664675,0.000010097257,0.00008754178,0.41359192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691179,0.11221821,0.0001898521,0.0154587105,0.00041728455,0.000045275727,0.0000019180916,0.000017305096,0.0025335252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983514,0.00029443274,0.00030112494,0.00031074713,0.00035292283,0.00038939083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989499,0.00020692032,0.000083171864,0.0004133553,0.00017327492,0.00017336628],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017328501,0.0001651015,0.00031476005,0.000009996696,0.0009758424,0.00016794211,0.0006816925,0.000060998842,0.0015055779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015352586,0.000113560935,0.00011794201,0.0001667912,0.00072799774,0.0005016047,0.00019169188,0.0001731317,0.0005580096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005101234,0.000047607202,0.000036309,0.00067329215,0.000012259349,0.0000026356888,0.0067823585,5.81046e-8,0.000007536558,0.9106909,0.06185518,0.01988675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007169074,0.00002435225,0.00010047165,0.0014845844,0.00014061334,0.00001083966,0.00037013632,0.000001826029,0.000027910479,0.0010133004,0.996584,0.00017028235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002259401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008505023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006157244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115151706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868689271","doi":"10.21991/c9737t","title":"Canada, the United Nations Human Rights Council, and Universal Periodic Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Mandate; International human rights law; Commission; Fundamental rights; Law; Promotion (chess); Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07843411927388214,"score_gpt":0.28236564935882386,"score_spread":0.20393153008494172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868689271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005555386,0.008993148,0.0023644117,0.060769606,0.001565688,0.0013185411,0.00035373107,0.00018705158,0.91889244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407226,0.0010798208,0.00013366563,0.0030283525,0.000086701046,0.00003917985,0.000042366715,0.000004161004,0.0015135219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778104,0.00014475513,0.00035030895,0.0003267256,0.0008708506,0.0005263116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830765,0.00025270946,0.0001379526,0.00026204155,0.0007780545,0.00026157039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007098048,0.00020760238,0.00021790796,0.00020171683,0.008864365,0.00007785901,0.00042687464,0.000097761695,0.0007741051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006605403,0.0001651081,0.00008737283,0.0010544562,0.009815943,0.00052352296,0.000104180996,0.00023667855,0.00004349124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007995215,0.00002607,0.0010449197,0.000031484273,0.000027421102,0.000024433197,0.00032027691,0.000004775171,0.000004553551,0.9285309,0.06994036,0.000036821802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002081105,0.00001916923,0.0004631679,0.00056846987,0.00010390131,0.00007769161,0.00208052,0.000012948586,0.000008538837,0.009764654,0.9864443,0.0002485349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8047987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9531894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98851687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007439114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00898781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1877220609","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1934392","title":"The Unfortunate Triumph of Form Over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science","score_opus":0.049987463537957195,"score_gpt":0.3217108380000008,"score_spread":0.2717233744620436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1877220609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74950814,0.0031641515,0.000030883515,0.0035386058,0.00027726343,0.0002043074,0.000004123818,0.000008957301,0.24326354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943165,0.0040336777,0.000008475803,0.00007426229,0.000057193625,0.0000028133975,2.1392691e-7,0.000004827992,0.0015020109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975617,0.000092507034,0.00022574258,0.00008474412,0.00023823311,0.0017971027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994675,0.00008304604,0.000119919874,0.00008771268,0.00007766621,0.00016416606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002872655,0.0000699245,0.00010188902,0.000044085653,0.00061400817,0.000032709533,0.00036784454,0.000054689586,0.00005983292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007912201,0.000051507235,0.000060709095,0.00018954824,0.00029859823,0.00028341584,0.0000056227445,0.0006416034,0.000005301609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004957594,0.0000098966,0.0024991743,0.0000010410952,0.0000121822495,0.000005946892,0.0081313085,1.5137776e-7,0.0000055272676,0.98664826,0.00003071137,0.0026062392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003626593,0.00029255723,0.008016178,0.000040918407,0.000020674419,0.000035990117,0.04200376,0.000005506808,0.00021166568,0.8439542,0.104866765,0.00018914066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66342473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99880296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33537826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001146918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069958908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878148134","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1129","title":"Aboriginal Over-representation and R. v. Gladue: Where We Were, Where We Are and Where We Might Be Going","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Representation (politics); Supreme court; Political science; Law; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.05892869499764502,"score_gpt":0.36327674237386415,"score_spread":0.3043480473762191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878148134","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009364684,0.87184244,0.000017411956,0.106414825,0.0003373827,0.0007253907,0.000031210588,0.000100273486,0.011166388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03636347,0.95708793,0.0003178909,0.00072960206,0.0003933024,0.000038839964,0.000006115327,0.000027847964,0.005034971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971574,0.00038722978,0.00049611356,0.00063847983,0.0007842604,0.000536508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985294,0.0002616524,0.00027451513,0.00039297168,0.0002042696,0.00033721377],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006772309,0.0003252134,0.00065433036,0.000036248563,0.0010866153,0.0001874001,0.0003374861,0.00016109349,0.0011639827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007656834,0.00029338058,0.00015291873,0.0003332448,0.0006586982,0.0010323689,0.00007147127,0.00030087552,0.000091322756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009245874,0.00018273729,0.047614247,0.034904074,0.00013629517,0.0004210181,0.010691182,0.000002189288,0.00016336906,0.10502108,0.77559483,0.025176527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026601812,0.000048271035,0.00090127334,0.016715433,0.00016485476,0.00006466975,0.0007976671,0.000009379855,0.000011431069,0.0006079036,0.98005086,0.00036225442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004361642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05395872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20445602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103539474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018444534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1884302434","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries' Engagement with the Fair Cross Section Right: Aboriginal Underrepresentation on Ontario Juries and the Boston Marathon Bomber's Jury Wheel Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.05628836377254533,"score_gpt":0.38336543852948407,"score_spread":0.32707707475693876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1884302434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44306633,0.12984847,0.0003234111,0.14869292,0.0018105044,0.00666104,0.000030317173,0.00017041684,0.2693966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681096,0.028460516,0.00003839067,0.0015301264,0.00025464126,0.00014161719,0.000008005303,0.000011702484,0.001445409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977588,0.00065504224,0.000297154,0.00029416918,0.00075700984,0.00023781437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880856,0.0002864578,0.00026061793,0.00034035143,0.00020441666,0.000099571844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029780793,0.00017395431,0.00032494828,0.000016038222,0.0008528692,0.00015998592,0.00026007774,0.00004951339,0.00011017139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005477955,0.00008925348,0.00008089747,0.0001559556,0.0014391348,0.0003363087,0.000048236405,0.0002986339,0.000017701619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032464231,0.000092540744,0.00059060653,0.0005302153,0.0000476495,0.0000064606916,0.022894751,0.000016202184,0.0000016013665,0.96944785,0.0049075866,0.0011398621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007373713,0.00019382425,0.0012061371,0.0010338065,0.000183078,0.0000062902313,0.0010098098,0.0000040181817,0.000024912737,0.002349122,0.99311477,0.00013685813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048753638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.291345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98820716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020766917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036291522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9575808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188455200","doi":"","title":"The Rise and Spread of the Special Advocate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; State (computer science); Natural (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.01747033424007563,"score_gpt":0.27840009135303956,"score_spread":0.26092975711296396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188455200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562253,0.009351736,0.00004630678,0.014619853,0.00051320915,0.00010464925,5.2038854e-7,0.000007295998,0.01913115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96817064,0.026531827,0.000004469634,0.000021811462,0.0012205414,7.397581e-7,1.4904458e-8,0.0000034692755,0.004046477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984727,0.00016507607,0.00013429571,0.00006732843,0.00030705426,0.0008535725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995795,0.00011699394,0.0001054889,0.000092929055,0.000058857066,0.000046245194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017208585,0.000051322902,0.00007008599,0.000012012713,0.0017936742,0.000031195304,0.000342942,0.000030609757,0.00001702406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019752452,0.000027587776,0.000066505374,0.0001117841,0.0006545602,0.00011002209,0.000034475146,0.00058903574,0.0000062474073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077466364,0.000026491676,0.010019653,0.0000021958986,0.000039053295,0.0000033083143,0.0076333582,0.0000029792939,0.00011273226,0.9307109,0.0026320773,0.04873979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030283481,0.00015578013,0.015288851,0.00002902444,0.000045781573,0.0003881164,0.01724648,0.000005547892,0.00016871095,0.3682439,0.5979921,0.00013281585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009267592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01855542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5953601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016559742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017222246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1888803890","doi":"","title":"Exceptions: The Criminal Law's Illogical Approach to HIV-Related Aggravated Assaults","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Commit; Causation; Deterrence (psychology); Psychology; Sodomy; Conflation; Generalization; Criminology; Criminal law; Fallacy; Due Process Clause; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Homosexuality; Supreme court; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.045935757854532334,"score_gpt":0.3281204472885819,"score_spread":0.28218468943404956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888803890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30027926,0.000016985585,0.00053198694,0.018006852,0.00041573436,0.00035572986,0.0000031963466,0.00020441334,0.68018585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835975,0.000010263071,0.0018805305,0.0017231198,0.00022038196,0.000037299786,0.0000066083853,0.000007168584,0.012517084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848354,0.00016358441,0.00020620531,0.00028712716,0.00046845817,0.00039111404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911815,0.00020055218,0.00004205518,0.0002698074,0.00014332375,0.00022609763],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010987807,0.00011509147,0.00012190333,0.000030380374,0.0011012233,0.00017912229,0.00054814667,0.00017480247,0.0014953609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046396584,0.000070073576,0.00008238427,0.00035268947,0.0006239664,0.00017673292,0.0000739801,0.00040205443,0.0009797418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015124308,0.00010596781,0.00017173184,0.0000029776108,0.000006605793,0.0000025796328,0.008353445,0.000009339894,0.0015175487,0.9712169,0.016517902,0.0020798775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022453142,0.000078486926,0.009983963,0.00001744765,0.000073223455,0.000018755325,0.022206292,0.00016669005,0.00020494485,0.011184329,0.9554534,0.00038792702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006814481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006324072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026522956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063608175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891044298","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1003","title":"The Impact of Lovelace v. Ontario on Section 15 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Art; History; Geology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05418493241747736,"score_gpt":0.35494021488147326,"score_spread":0.3007552824639959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891044298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41580966,0.05994589,0.00002070026,0.033654407,0.0016172176,0.0023151077,0.000013785703,0.00004612904,0.4865771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750811,0.020289574,0.0000037738996,0.00033709512,0.000121689605,0.0000068530608,5.1295086e-7,0.0000049604873,0.0041544815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988698,0.00021913504,0.00024285322,0.00010991355,0.00037450422,0.00018382586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991723,0.00014748219,0.0001674674,0.00033061983,0.00013827907,0.00004390503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011250025,0.00008266213,0.0001987583,0.0000061345895,0.0003033971,0.000018909777,0.0003424722,0.00004099148,0.00067885424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013542191,0.000040709732,0.0002637756,0.00017820121,0.00027093987,0.000106691994,0.000029449118,0.00013946406,0.000032274795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036167493,0.0006595741,0.05043192,0.0020842317,0.0003537855,0.0000084251205,0.020360745,0.00006853907,0.0011042276,0.5158877,0.3539546,0.05472459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051056744,0.00008840654,0.010205752,0.0016711248,0.000050853097,0.0000027933393,0.000069140544,0.0000012775371,0.00004705356,0.0005405281,0.98721004,0.00006197596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13635285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3224812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6332554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017257305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021472888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86939824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891455159","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120806.2353","title":"Implementation of Respecting and Safeguarding Human Rights Provisions at the Criminal Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of criminal justice; Safeguarding; Criminal justice; Political science; Human rights; Criminal procedure; Law; Criminal code; Criminal justice ethics; China; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09841503542281801,"score_gpt":0.48206651790495214,"score_spread":0.3836514824821341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891455159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98814994,0.00059856486,0.0000060511748,0.0011596121,0.00006202658,0.00018640798,0.000002816541,0.000025502432,0.009809077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908584,0.000066036206,0.00022208836,0.000025502786,0.00010624306,0.000009853625,0.0000147609735,0.0000032563973,0.00046643097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990581,0.00023837913,0.00021159336,0.000087134955,0.00021041516,0.00019436768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898493,0.00029864663,0.0001729341,0.00026405373,0.00022560018,0.000053832795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011605767,0.00006372843,0.00007572282,0.000016472615,0.0053995945,0.0001775669,0.0002712195,0.00003821621,0.0000878311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015315742,0.00004288063,0.000034047942,0.00010579559,0.0007262782,0.001014139,0.00018887954,0.00010786914,0.000007803665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004626458,0.00006339284,0.04494522,0.00012332744,0.00002387007,2.325947e-7,0.33544385,0.000005671295,0.02992401,0.57353824,0.001818224,0.014067701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050976564,0.00008835969,0.4223995,0.00016377676,0.0004991226,0.000014016847,0.3706547,0.000013614117,0.01773017,0.0035247891,0.1840379,0.00036429425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010697127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012973544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57001346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118272284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014318194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99589527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891707747","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1254","title":"The Charter versus the Government’s Crime Agenda","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Arbitrariness; Discretion; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Judicial discretion; Conviction; Deference; Judicial review; Sentencing guidelines; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.11234035499142955,"score_gpt":0.3732694735707201,"score_spread":0.2609291185792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891707747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045916828,0.39863577,0.00001281846,0.13480608,0.0030557339,0.0009492718,0.000011803483,0.00007176176,0.4619976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7401221,0.23243418,0.000033291464,0.01630957,0.0018090529,0.00012232793,0.0000025109728,0.00002335317,0.009143627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979772,0.00037099834,0.00021216414,0.0001344507,0.00078741123,0.00051778724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878526,0.0005157535,0.00008861256,0.00043155267,0.00005668515,0.00012212739],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002750188,0.00011604444,0.00016125228,0.0000018035889,0.0014388122,0.0001082286,0.0006153839,0.000036615136,0.0008535301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035483032,0.000060416995,0.00014901039,0.00010889696,0.0004352667,0.00032273203,0.00008691536,0.00014637885,0.00092618953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001544386,0.000023084976,0.000069960435,0.00014410818,0.000026831096,0.0000010799442,0.0012143948,1.838547e-8,0.000009487717,0.6810262,0.30371848,0.013750926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005719999,0.000014573779,0.0001993918,0.0002886812,0.00010767941,0.0000011636822,0.00036113916,3.28166e-7,0.000013512128,0.00016029135,0.99870133,0.00009469138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001114736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016058594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73966295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011724903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004979471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896091292","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1199","title":"Remedial Minimalism under Section 24(1) of the Charter: Bjelland, Khadr and Nasogaluak","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Remedial education; Law; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Political science; Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03979245113394108,"score_gpt":0.32204685933855426,"score_spread":0.28225440820461317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896091292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5494104,0.082415864,0.00003112177,0.17156996,0.015131942,0.003471205,0.000039012946,0.00018606376,0.17774442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97206557,0.024663704,0.000063489904,0.0016065141,0.0006648468,0.000014284471,0.0000018856892,0.000008835629,0.0009108735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.00019241062,0.00024998785,0.00019580162,0.00041967945,0.000206994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992336,0.0001169916,0.00012499935,0.0002911758,0.00013841495,0.00009478727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001220507,0.00010261705,0.00023837003,0.0000112731805,0.00035793643,0.00003536756,0.00027642728,0.00009117856,0.00059413956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021253047,0.00007104983,0.00011038711,0.00014811875,0.000552542,0.00015385267,0.00006332549,0.00022117258,0.000023063212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033686072,0.00009423711,0.0040379367,0.0020170526,0.000047679634,0.000003945719,0.0034894168,2.8237466e-7,0.009802733,0.9060445,0.06449533,0.009933214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009543351,0.000022737424,0.0010300687,0.00080410263,0.000089082314,0.0000084359335,0.00012850136,0.0000016203046,0.00018787755,0.0018473379,0.99568176,0.00010304866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024160324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036796674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93118644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017508237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009180692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897452689","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n3p158","title":"Modernising the Law: Breaches of the Peace &amp; Justices of the Peace","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Magistrate; Legislation; Political science; Economic Justice; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.1130551996794037,"score_gpt":0.3569241526508915,"score_spread":0.2438689529714878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897452689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92478657,0.0029619464,0.000054543467,0.022062726,0.00047758364,0.00007652535,0.000007638747,0.0000024452654,0.04957002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983033,0.00012567178,0.00009025731,0.00041324305,0.0002639151,1.521168e-7,3.3645208e-8,0.0000036476583,0.00079980824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00020419408,0.00024626285,0.000047101446,0.0004784871,0.00015683156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988826,0.00027920312,0.00035274622,0.00014949053,0.00024924308,0.00008670204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198596,0.000056854456,0.00013508361,0.000008944028,0.00039030155,0.000063384745,0.0004143734,0.000038691436,0.000006566454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025970017,0.000025555528,0.000100739046,0.000058352394,0.0010134695,0.00013892438,0.00008037999,0.00016591132,4.4933358e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009321147,0.000029660105,0.0007589784,0.000029055935,0.000017143953,5.1379413e-7,0.03294169,0.000079937,0.00020192807,0.96422386,0.0015793486,0.00012853811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044153447,0.00013123767,0.005209111,0.00057675445,0.0005442367,0.000086597545,0.08199255,0.00013638148,0.0018495064,0.095034346,0.81381285,0.00018486248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014202008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070887376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86918956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030074052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018883207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897879740","doi":"","title":"L'utilisation de la procédure de l’avis consultatif devant la Cour suprême du Canada : Essai de typologie","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.054620463468527544,"score_gpt":0.38174220310415086,"score_spread":0.3271217396356233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897879740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94494593,0.0011379685,0.000034438217,0.03364111,0.00031476893,0.00043378718,0.00039977467,0.000011310496,0.01908092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98734033,0.008126892,0.0026625805,0.000851572,0.0003649821,0.00001728107,0.0000046793516,0.000024296342,0.0006074048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905657,0.0013709418,0.0012650291,0.0012022735,0.00061901106,0.0049770055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985266,0.0058927746,0.00030934333,0.00051528384,0.0009750628,0.007041547],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027217159,0.00042224585,0.0008377883,0.00048177806,0.0013118853,0.00091529626,0.0014399549,0.00046041587,0.00032343948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025597721,0.00042087073,0.00014292735,0.0010211343,0.027184518,0.0014413637,0.0005008288,0.0011949409,0.000016986458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069816255,0.00023409494,0.046115283,0.00012556129,0.000018595412,0.000016133294,0.00024194371,0.00014110177,0.0003851438,0.95157593,0.0002912413,0.00078516995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020778994,0.00089645793,0.1282696,0.0003415087,0.00013975111,0.00044853598,0.014772692,0.026964208,0.005851398,0.68252605,0.13648786,0.0012240522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48298228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09632057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3866617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046304455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05245626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897915674","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1083","title":"Search and Seizure in 2004: Dialogue or Dead-End?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Discretion; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Suspect; Constitution; Judicial review; Power (physics); Judicial discretion; Prerogative; Politics","score_opus":0.08796202279381093,"score_gpt":0.38201766065352805,"score_spread":0.2940556378597171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897915674","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034566365,0.6931505,0.00005192516,0.17480282,0.0003620486,0.0022362575,0.000034056706,0.00017483786,0.094621174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74405366,0.24647518,0.0005015774,0.00563243,0.0004393164,0.00003832972,0.000007134946,0.000015541385,0.0028368102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983511,0.00030797502,0.00027194613,0.0002663169,0.00039528892,0.00040735854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993283,0.00018154505,0.000032166743,0.0002026796,0.00008249327,0.00017277071],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018031431,0.000120211,0.0003108322,0.000025320636,0.0002537842,0.00006290321,0.00026461843,0.00007598647,0.001287188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002655364,0.000095024014,0.000056580524,0.00027629893,0.0003093238,0.00035580833,0.000064348984,0.0001926446,0.00024619472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007860437,0.00024260518,0.0050736554,0.005267963,0.000032970383,0.00019247907,0.0070246146,0.0000128411675,0.00006231239,0.6049944,0.09466838,0.28234917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010212153,0.000024858478,0.00030709855,0.0019684425,0.000026666214,0.000008268656,0.0001340184,0.000006794826,0.000012058989,0.0002867127,0.99698174,0.000141227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009742494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12520573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90231335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096903204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020007076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900986889","doi":"","title":"Constitutional exclusion under s 35(5) of the Constitution: should an accused bear a 'threshold burden' of proving that his or her constitutional right has been infringed?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constitution; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Constitutional right; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.11860843812498421,"score_gpt":0.34083033410066355,"score_spread":0.22222189597567932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900986889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582778,0.00032920248,0.0077257133,0.005107913,0.003129053,0.00056485477,0.00012931212,0.000037257738,0.024698893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656224,0.000019652183,0.0020957515,0.00018601498,0.00095860625,0.000003909621,0.000002122619,0.000007739073,0.00016397757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962798,0.0002734561,0.0008997051,0.00028734026,0.0018016312,0.00045807194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632585,0.0005619986,0.0012078086,0.00034209577,0.0011642281,0.00039802433],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017735529,0.00026166614,0.00051158044,0.00017652869,0.00139498,0.00012919927,0.00103298,0.00023203445,0.00080955896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015765845,0.00017786356,0.00029065713,0.00043602235,0.015524114,0.00089491473,0.00017024876,0.0008809201,0.0000058442306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001345693,0.00032644608,0.0032705935,0.00038702757,0.000121056255,0.00012724621,0.042707678,0.0018874304,0.009704566,0.93909776,0.0004644587,0.00056002085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077993763,0.002569161,0.00889959,0.005254206,0.01431731,0.0031547814,0.7382649,0.0006278256,0.020667857,0.013194564,0.18268974,0.0025606751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046471765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064762443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9259032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015950533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00490195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1901621180","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1213","title":"Transparency Confined to the Courthouse: A Critical Analysis of Criminal Lawyer's Assn., C.B.C. and National Post","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Democracy; Transparency (behavior); Political science; Section (typography); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.11468649768049417,"score_gpt":0.381161973295792,"score_spread":0.26647547561529783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1901621180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043839447,0.21459231,0.0042421436,0.31017327,0.0012307063,0.00478145,0.0011356135,0.00035376957,0.4196513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98654574,0.008058926,0.00053910713,0.004614117,0.000074218675,0.00003799534,0.00000924247,0.000008694076,0.000111935944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978999,0.0003267039,0.00043737466,0.00027781192,0.00076833204,0.00028990186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982677,0.00042092832,0.00008135827,0.00023694609,0.00078975095,0.00020328852],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020676197,0.00013730784,0.0004654176,0.000062266816,0.000372364,0.000038544476,0.00040926557,0.00005894786,0.0019040949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010075936,0.00010124191,0.00020590854,0.0006010085,0.00061910937,0.00018058241,0.000039231418,0.00011518439,0.00003431882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029696323,0.00008645191,0.00046517307,0.00064430776,0.00016559575,0.0000061929536,0.005109291,0.0000010091421,0.000039943377,0.98869497,0.003279249,0.0014781256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015156517,0.00023171604,0.012658608,0.0017943438,0.0063008117,0.000008715064,0.0013163016,0.000038364033,0.00005181895,0.002220254,0.97481287,0.00041464847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008326696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029836638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003226573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018833576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911534773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2024942","title":"Criminal Justice in America: Constitutionalization Without Foundation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.03545949680480907,"score_gpt":0.3539532693929335,"score_spread":0.3184937725881244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911534773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73219705,0.005014913,0.19058242,0.0075714644,0.0025001664,0.0003844621,0.0000012735331,0.00009120976,0.061657026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951023,0.0029296067,0.00020100779,0.00016537694,0.00091528514,0.0000038738303,0.0000033777883,0.000005256133,0.0006739004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976945,0.00019462217,0.0001903602,0.00009162853,0.00035211997,0.001476799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995612,0.00007090812,0.000112165115,0.0000530317,0.000100589044,0.0001021392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023000692,0.00007337792,0.00009327217,0.00008790825,0.0005773902,0.00006521718,0.0001406974,0.000049492304,0.0001251956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004143752,0.00007242113,0.000036676505,0.00024308178,0.00021803017,0.0009158775,0.000011949206,0.00056402583,0.00010713917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028419689,0.000052542673,0.018331314,0.000006351662,0.000007764974,6.8535286e-7,0.00365231,0.00003808465,0.00004377112,0.9668013,0.000069692906,0.010967757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014959568,0.00035799414,0.026344204,0.00019576002,0.00082967815,0.0006367617,0.2380025,0.00032079726,0.000058509184,0.26745346,0.46337247,0.000931912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013623856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00577468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69934785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001327686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022781002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44408768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915707574","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1101","title":"Has Everything Been Decided?: Certainty, the Charter and Criminal Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Legal certainty; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.075023956811721,"score_gpt":0.340254609789666,"score_spread":0.265230652977945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915707574","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025098922,0.47230017,0.0005286963,0.28055486,0.0013758765,0.0024444605,0.000022793944,0.00029261323,0.2173816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494014,0.03712082,0.00031312893,0.010455585,0.0009873285,0.000043256252,0.000007028192,0.000019985102,0.0016515123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981634,0.00031398784,0.0003242529,0.0002849221,0.0005054781,0.0004079395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893445,0.0004070674,0.00010448849,0.0002898088,0.00015410109,0.000110074936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018273321,0.0001587938,0.0002834616,0.000013849397,0.0014180227,0.0002587997,0.00039653128,0.00006191585,0.00038282355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027127613,0.00011134993,0.000110737026,0.00014550042,0.000648665,0.00036059885,0.00009114239,0.00018875196,0.00012626748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013157527,0.000047524547,0.00029641492,0.003029886,0.00002017119,0.000033608987,0.0034253986,0.0000020620928,0.000048948765,0.86260194,0.11688255,0.01359835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006749636,0.000018982913,0.00046920325,0.0015972254,0.0006213288,0.000019619129,0.0006247938,0.000008568077,0.00000900073,0.003631627,0.99275845,0.00017370273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016348116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01203944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92430246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056460438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010330115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916008992","doi":"","title":"Seeking access to the confidential records of a third party: the accused's right to a fair trial v the third party's right to privacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Right to privacy; Conviction; Constitutional right; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Law; Third party; Information privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to a fair trial; Public disclosure; Internet privacy; Human rights; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.10869781096703321,"score_gpt":0.38302469648797116,"score_spread":0.274326885520938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916008992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5916862,0.00061485387,0.0057919067,0.2648527,0.0025162322,0.0018750413,0.000110369336,0.000028518067,0.13252419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459076,0.000027519838,0.00009990665,0.0023125962,0.0014109251,0.000017266952,7.323261e-7,0.000005846486,0.0015344494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752164,0.0004522817,0.00063175755,0.00020688066,0.0009094147,0.00027801358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776304,0.00067803677,0.0004805915,0.00021817333,0.0006618998,0.00019826376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017783142,0.00017349287,0.0003455856,0.00008350072,0.0009680645,0.00063393847,0.0019532084,0.000051131123,0.00029469124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033108372,0.000082186416,0.00019595286,0.0003213572,0.00027859956,0.00043456798,0.00020683112,0.00031568436,0.000074564836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018577658,0.0005087047,0.00069581793,0.000009881685,0.000582226,0.00003249648,0.5038586,0.00043222107,0.0013897283,0.26703376,0.2023743,0.0045046173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014838135,0.00067738345,0.0006470097,0.0001652784,0.000080978665,0.0000143345105,0.016261373,0.0000484493,0.0005185876,0.0130092595,0.9669204,0.00017315357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000724686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042427666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7645461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007015103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001316687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7445667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191862960","doi":"","title":"Legal Professional Privilege: Is It Absolute?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Subject (documents); Warrant; Privilege (computing); Proportionality (law); Officer; High Court; Suspect; Covert; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.026271096108404373,"score_gpt":0.2822127217620872,"score_spread":0.25594162565368284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191862960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90440977,0.00012992551,0.0000703475,0.031989478,0.00033307017,0.00017848442,0.000014264048,0.000046985402,0.06282766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396191,0.000041772313,0.00031897097,0.00023734299,0.00013581608,1.918954e-7,0.0000030069018,0.0000056967415,0.059638064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985679,0.00019818239,0.00010717738,0.00020964927,0.00060458627,0.00031253777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926585,0.00012573946,0.000124006,0.00025480983,0.00014556361,0.00008401138],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089629216,0.00009745745,0.00014681854,0.00005883796,0.0016865694,0.000069663256,0.0008106916,0.000104102364,0.0012339086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051749197,0.000091679736,0.00012821722,0.00029234696,0.00067162444,0.001023855,0.00018096385,0.00031084908,0.00024851412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025644715,0.00041262095,0.019291729,0.00007355909,0.00008034667,0.00014750462,0.03616138,0.000052669486,0.0030058324,0.32080075,0.6160126,0.0037045563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045638173,0.00005258041,0.14663637,0.0001440104,0.00009762226,0.0000058912624,0.0363257,0.000052432493,0.0001960692,0.0037159382,0.812016,0.0003010047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016150717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008594115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31708482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007597704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021955825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920161452","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1230","title":"The Charter Balance against Unscrupulous Law and Order Politics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Politics; Political science; Redress; Imprisonment","score_opus":0.04140664533343985,"score_gpt":0.3352833756062549,"score_spread":0.293876730272815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920161452","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002457903,0.5507953,0.00002872207,0.059521552,0.0009756374,0.00084833096,0.000014050365,0.000104012535,0.3852545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71668535,0.25435394,0.00010917729,0.026071839,0.0007745219,0.00003547331,0.0000042961346,0.000016992943,0.0019483794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843013,0.0002300787,0.00023061458,0.00015901995,0.00034920612,0.00060094084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990309,0.00021999826,0.000070974755,0.00029854014,0.00014405955,0.0002355144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013853706,0.00012978632,0.00022746547,0.0000049149075,0.0011483593,0.00010876932,0.00027944538,0.00005455953,0.00011313577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018386473,0.00008754282,0.00006526084,0.00012350526,0.0007015158,0.0003575928,0.00006256801,0.00013262327,0.00019307973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011283976,0.000014986618,0.00039282092,0.00028876425,0.000007859779,0.0000012597797,0.0005207211,2.8226122e-8,0.0000061162496,0.98547804,0.010836961,0.002451331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004275164,0.000009130571,0.00010413145,0.00075814873,0.00004619412,0.0000037960438,0.000118092044,0.0000017771844,0.000005293256,0.0012686762,0.9975111,0.00013094599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020839314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003144457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98667413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004606006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051532646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88323677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923440742","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1112","title":"The Impact of the Charter on the Law of Search and Seizure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitutionality; Constitutional law; Constitution; Parliament; Expectation of privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10079378572812524,"score_gpt":0.3801849063068127,"score_spread":0.2793911205786874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923440742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4351586,0.1954073,0.0000027575675,0.16935731,0.00032086176,0.0028486827,0.000049105638,0.000033988792,0.19682138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93886226,0.059760243,0.0000023565458,0.00087934243,0.000055110373,0.000008035646,2.502131e-7,0.00000452527,0.00042785992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985871,0.00045764906,0.00019728215,0.00010780948,0.0004514645,0.00019873636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989039,0.00044911937,0.000075074204,0.00038660064,0.0001379274,0.000047379068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016220233,0.00008174983,0.00019724747,0.0000036628724,0.0008552505,0.000019278008,0.00046949016,0.000031951928,0.0001591215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001554835,0.00003106295,0.00018175335,0.00015279326,0.0014562423,0.00007508354,0.000065617176,0.00014530469,0.000014832617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015303993,0.00003634736,0.00082134607,0.00035626232,0.000038439517,0.0000017317248,0.003284447,0.000001552544,0.0000954715,0.9713075,0.022350954,0.0016906214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089397785,0.0001417414,0.005053622,0.003012531,0.00007249901,0.000013575376,0.0004626864,0.000007930032,0.00027790407,0.0018864872,0.9888562,0.00012539944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00831078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002519479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023852985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011506377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W192887305","doi":"","title":"The Charter in the Administrative Process: Statutory Remedy or Refounding of Administrative Jurisdiction?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Administrative law; Statutory law","score_opus":0.15176508418999007,"score_gpt":0.42895055652382563,"score_spread":0.27718547233383556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W192887305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5835792,0.0018130683,0.0025389495,0.017746642,0.0014378377,0.0022579639,0.00004051647,0.00012604013,0.3904598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983522,0.00049111125,0.00015799807,0.00008444055,0.00029257088,0.000040615938,0.0000027792362,0.0000044052263,0.0005738484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982923,0.00026374546,0.0004607958,0.000229989,0.00040491245,0.00034825376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976099,0.0016771167,0.0002269645,0.00021386778,0.00020033581,0.000071828304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031000383,0.00013075862,0.00017368296,0.000062863444,0.0012903755,0.00010749998,0.00044384066,0.00008504196,0.000052673702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010594747,0.000076888835,0.000067694615,0.00046953032,0.0022457654,0.0003179035,0.000020000902,0.00023295508,0.000009332477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020974521,0.0001122093,0.002090672,0.00004865155,0.000021039501,0.000050418053,0.04994004,0.0000070762217,0.00009170692,0.94596016,0.00018867022,0.0012796129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041425345,0.00038014943,0.008145014,0.0007158067,0.00007197669,0.000058648402,0.61752874,0.000017665847,0.00071805826,0.0057711205,0.3658482,0.00033033686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029076252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03326423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94018906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013905711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011460835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99246556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932693296","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110702.006","title":"Resolution to Conflict of Competency of Evidence: The Analysis Based on Legal Culture and Litigant system/RÉSOLUTION DES CONFLITS DE COMPÉTENCE DE LA PREUVE: L'ANALYSE FONDÉE SUR LA CULTURE JURIDIQUE ET LE SYSTÈME JUSTICIABLE","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07851836060272198,"score_gpt":0.33813753556992165,"score_spread":0.25961917496719966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932693296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59378994,0.01338158,0.012393541,0.013211111,0.0008877788,0.0024350192,0.00090713403,0.00012798875,0.3628659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728566,0.00025941478,0.0010779672,0.00040213924,0.0000964824,0.000023066394,0.000002921045,0.000009701285,0.00084264856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955266,0.0017510873,0.00048379533,0.0005259364,0.00080777117,0.00090479583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969538,0.0006657199,0.00035914988,0.0002952419,0.0009393996,0.0007867006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006881459,0.0002473818,0.00051376264,0.00027773128,0.0017482131,0.0002219128,0.0009237343,0.00033597287,0.000024408277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018734023,0.00019951619,0.00020583966,0.0035184852,0.006791896,0.0007347751,0.00007280196,0.00036954382,0.0000030260421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058094116,0.000081379934,0.01077869,0.00044461963,0.00007656571,0.00003118263,0.08034528,0.000686751,0.002705031,0.90356606,0.0008131256,0.00041322055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011778737,0.0013962104,0.6053367,0.010926992,0.0062295976,0.00009981012,0.22466284,0.04728067,0.008173925,0.0038860298,0.08854966,0.0022796548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6257806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2057535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022711258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011178361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935613573","doi":"","title":"Context, Choice, and Rights: PHS Community Services Society v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Political science; Charter; Politics; Social rights","score_opus":0.03665535828249157,"score_gpt":0.27433113153540206,"score_spread":0.2376757732529105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935613573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950853,0.0010424946,0.0000042651563,0.00097599946,0.00045044083,0.00019676793,0.000031945412,0.000091096445,0.10212172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913211,0.000117836316,0.00038198943,0.0045129787,0.0003435381,0.000015527357,0.000008652236,0.000012559749,0.0032858578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982521,0.00037868606,0.00023788342,0.00025099356,0.0004066245,0.00047373548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986764,0.00022054126,0.0001080223,0.0003874074,0.00014388649,0.00046374972],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071528164,0.00018468362,0.00023986497,0.000012116969,0.0024277782,0.00014128174,0.0006120252,0.00012940915,0.00070622884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049143713,0.0001697939,0.00007934491,0.00014268036,0.0004922102,0.00060312,0.00014436018,0.0004527913,0.00004552343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059499675,0.00029339423,0.12363527,0.00035373183,0.00020243778,0.000034197226,0.06497337,0.0000020757507,0.00038690152,0.69283086,0.11470842,0.0025198604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026623954,0.00003616341,0.02028111,0.00007155858,0.000039684048,0.000002217668,0.0080490615,0.000010710883,0.00028083127,0.0038913507,0.96677655,0.00029453734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8520681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002052133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036215797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936754017","doi":"","title":"Les services électroniques de Revenu Québec, aspects juridiques et protection des renseignements confidentiels","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.023154108390587746,"score_gpt":0.2701675367204721,"score_spread":0.24701342832988438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936754017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722993,0.04228062,0.00089939195,0.011135721,0.00067866826,0.0010725089,0.00047229836,0.00019659312,0.0709649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504023,0.0156597,0.0005572792,0.000055861085,0.00025238053,0.00000244615,0.00010638225,0.000020112207,0.03294353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970157,0.00072318426,0.00044500062,0.00076931546,0.00049170834,0.0005550883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804944,0.0001718426,0.0006567145,0.0006492819,0.00025945727,0.00021325349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074670184,0.00032416708,0.00044634653,0.00010724131,0.0016492715,0.00019120847,0.00074811856,0.00025289637,0.00014879373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046154135,0.00038721185,0.00011171646,0.0001918676,0.0013405663,0.001946755,0.00042836193,0.00025738214,0.000009047748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035450403,0.0049939672,0.11920244,0.009285743,0.0033140865,0.0049279686,0.03630305,0.00018304048,0.02449062,0.17364743,0.36476222,0.2553444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010189875,0.00043738168,0.038845245,0.0015697812,0.001003474,0.00014569561,0.0050888937,0.00011562807,0.002522993,0.0096975425,0.9388775,0.0006768377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9471195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8726024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57411534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011248657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058180443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943010453","doi":"10.32920/24237007.v1","title":"Whither International Law? Security Certificates, the Supreme Court, and the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Principle of legality; International human rights law; Human rights; International law; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Public international law; Right to property","score_opus":0.02641901366170655,"score_gpt":0.28566120161316,"score_spread":0.25924218795145343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943010453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680157,0.000047238365,0.0000035091705,0.1271332,0.0003462727,0.00019671764,0.000015608986,0.000013571811,0.20422813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972962,0.000049964834,0.0000038385083,0.00028028805,0.000047085632,0.000006266367,0.0000010810012,0.0000017062195,0.0023135531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993134,0.000083708495,0.000113186594,0.000084449646,0.00027978318,0.00012543127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941623,0.00039726935,0.00002937488,0.00008671558,0.000043817283,0.000026619902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066629576,0.00003816983,0.000069154485,0.0000113801125,0.00019370312,0.000030584622,0.00026306728,0.000016788037,0.00027219485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004811797,0.000019018707,0.000016654381,0.0001280589,0.00038365135,0.000056530527,0.00004470843,0.00006343274,0.0000072290895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006043984,0.000013659707,0.011857925,0.000008814009,0.00002177601,0.000009985286,0.029215101,0.000018739907,0.00004436603,0.86227,0.09616119,0.00031800495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010550545,0.000015941472,0.080095,0.000078493926,0.000031999763,0.0000030683568,0.058399092,0.0051795687,0.0006872754,0.20941289,0.6447662,0.0002753906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99353945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6528571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060156548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016563844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29803428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950021427","doi":"","title":"A Second Chance for the Harm Principle in Section 7? Gross Disproportionality Post-Bedford","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Harm principle; Harm; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Charter; Sociology","score_opus":0.10357095539118184,"score_gpt":0.42127848035895976,"score_spread":0.31770752496777793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950021427","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089561075,0.6582739,0.00058895815,0.03674986,0.0046920716,0.008604719,0.00032065413,0.00015392933,0.20105484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96710736,0.030587532,0.000032053078,0.0014600845,0.0003605095,0.0001931608,0.00003193065,0.00000864448,0.00021870065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987043,0.00007420111,0.00040960047,0.00020755935,0.0003474113,0.00025690795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991504,0.00007570369,0.00021862694,0.00018386595,0.00025598725,0.00011543453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002529912,0.0001116138,0.00026675194,0.000011555597,0.00030539595,0.00003310336,0.00019878474,0.00004460208,0.000034273307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011129045,0.00006917334,0.00010144054,0.00014707286,0.00040318398,0.00036095566,0.000057445155,0.00012771334,0.0000031884665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032111297,0.00005581071,0.00011421081,0.0030968012,0.0000064324977,2.441585e-7,0.00078159093,1.7335395e-7,0.0000038432872,0.98305386,0.0002695406,0.012585396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019497045,0.00006974491,0.00069755473,0.0018991962,0.00003114448,0.0000021622598,0.00029254486,0.000008968241,0.000033358447,0.00364534,0.99302244,0.00010257257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055192695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038830858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012441157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012331817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97870797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950405747","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.514","title":"Beyond Reasonable Doubt: An Abductive Dilemma in Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Acquittal; Dilemma; Reasonable doubt; Law; Adversarial system; Hearsay; Epistemology; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07507757489754922,"score_gpt":0.332331606111525,"score_spread":0.2572540312139758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950405747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6401737,0.000055176883,0.000024854233,0.00067030767,0.00017774993,0.00013466128,0.000003759131,0.000059705206,0.35870013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683154,0.00006589235,0.00068591174,0.0011257632,0.0002412809,0.000015937741,0.0000065228796,0.000004883459,0.0010222921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870336,0.00006471106,0.00019793762,0.00017289301,0.0003683499,0.00049275573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944735,0.00006852843,0.00006261987,0.00015751093,0.000096978074,0.00016700724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051192066,0.000112129695,0.00015146461,0.000055702716,0.0006502766,0.00006257673,0.0003124267,0.000108483524,0.00036251836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011180543,0.000102180864,0.000041590243,0.00022460529,0.0006045756,0.0015772526,0.000056025856,0.0001845984,0.00019127743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009482127,0.0000633659,0.0028932586,0.000010517141,0.0000024033675,0.000122014775,0.02092778,0.00008138374,0.000027118154,0.9733167,0.00039093048,0.0020696928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012354768,0.0013846429,0.06708941,0.0000950466,0.000051622614,0.00025575125,0.03496653,0.00017323703,0.0006749688,0.09722239,0.7955839,0.0012670286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031758532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031092957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87609434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008632802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016116009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98658705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952198423","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1235","title":"From Smith to Smickle: The Charter’s Minimal Impact on Mandatory Minimum Sentences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitutionality; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06241246396626157,"score_gpt":0.3777623568292147,"score_spread":0.3153498928629531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952198423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4285278,0.32492825,0.000039401075,0.1443889,0.0036856113,0.003207149,0.00026162164,0.00025455176,0.094706714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701327,0.017028991,0.000073652714,0.010322205,0.0016044446,0.0000593941,0.000008174607,0.000017170096,0.00075328175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976229,0.00042507166,0.0003224667,0.00029572874,0.0006770662,0.0006567462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985238,0.00037773058,0.000114208786,0.00048005956,0.00009742986,0.00040679914],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017964682,0.00022575077,0.0003855329,0.000019907138,0.00054530735,0.00010344799,0.0006857123,0.00006525034,0.0018560397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021093311,0.00013384709,0.00023859575,0.0002096069,0.00029751257,0.00040820628,0.00008280843,0.00017976102,0.0017100163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012156066,0.00029224288,0.007767806,0.0006553269,0.00013728504,0.000016904392,0.015623583,9.295246e-7,0.000171064,0.047092635,0.90612686,0.021993803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005796362,0.00008676512,0.00349896,0.002081028,0.00011058369,0.000002434137,0.00090305787,0.0000012400061,0.00003431603,0.00017012653,0.99284273,0.00021077151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007480341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011873147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5416049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001156239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013929272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953862133","doi":"","title":"압수수색과 위법수집증거배제법칙에 관한 연구","year":2008,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"형사정책연구원 연구총서","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Supreme court; Discretion; Law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Injustice; Search and seizure; Admissible evidence; Meaning (existential); Psychology","score_opus":0.08338113836521893,"score_gpt":0.33849270374932156,"score_spread":0.2551115653841026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953862133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190721,0.0025604172,0.00015129297,0.016684955,0.002995332,0.00046957345,0.000031646498,0.00024441723,0.15779023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956124,0.0026687132,0.0003062779,0.0010543508,0.0015623128,0.000014840405,0.000005599275,0.000030490348,0.03823339],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669033,0.00026623302,0.00047686393,0.00061638607,0.0009746677,0.0009755307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837667,0.00029365998,0.00018708935,0.0005202859,0.00017448286,0.00044782003],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006972146,0.00032276782,0.00042934835,0.00009031685,0.0017137697,0.00013588161,0.00080761034,0.00031024154,0.0033958603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037628025,0.00032372112,0.00028271353,0.0006502914,0.001125181,0.00055052486,0.0001729687,0.00040358136,0.0058665457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003351791,0.0013197709,0.184494,0.00041448392,0.00022021482,0.0022936282,0.17594789,0.00007119499,0.0014611547,0.124293275,0.47570664,0.03344257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004672878,0.00026524952,0.049589124,0.00020236477,0.00012399403,0.00006793687,0.0070545226,0.000097110096,0.0005728315,0.0021026304,0.93856907,0.00088786153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009297642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017027735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46286246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018028617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004613336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957645886","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1218","title":"Normative Foundations for Reasonable Expectations of Privacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Charter; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Authorization; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.15935085854212497,"score_gpt":0.39228605571898134,"score_spread":0.23293519717685637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957645886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017105128,0.08861605,0.007784028,0.018058814,0.0006195056,0.004487022,0.000106592226,0.00018038806,0.8784371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376668,0.038467508,0.020016626,0.00095637585,0.00017365997,0.0005612767,0.00004216901,0.000022168098,0.0020934392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990871,0.00010794575,0.00028490453,0.00013045796,0.00020285122,0.00018673946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895513,0.00020163863,0.00014602096,0.00021147178,0.0004123216,0.00007342133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060489366,0.00007227779,0.00021275626,0.000016327882,0.00040025247,0.000015569363,0.0002668228,0.000029781295,0.0008739877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006267882,0.0000666133,0.00012405084,0.0001852525,0.00023327791,0.00043451274,0.000026654689,0.000041907555,0.000080762016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047442077,0.000050395316,0.00006476564,0.00072444644,0.0000139388685,2.5278467e-7,0.0089605795,6.140485e-8,0.000010257121,0.9775665,0.010607416,0.0019966373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006626661,0.000040342267,0.000075920456,0.0013239039,0.000111045425,7.020588e-7,0.0015362586,0.0000028766342,0.000106075364,0.01501954,0.9816179,0.00009916954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002287597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020452137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039867475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015449635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9569552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958197909","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1125","title":"Fault and Punishment under Sections 7 and 12 of the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Punishment (psychology); Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Section (typography); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07239135689893765,"score_gpt":0.32578832363266713,"score_spread":0.25339696673372947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958197909","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19364698,0.4069416,0.00017350506,0.19631404,0.0010824158,0.0027460412,0.000030411265,0.00010741906,0.1989576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87795913,0.1191733,0.000026711657,0.001753669,0.000050737563,0.00001027198,5.672421e-7,0.0000032623802,0.0010223775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.000108806336,0.00013551509,0.00011223681,0.00020471036,0.00011788493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999646,0.000052659707,0.00004803949,0.00014049209,0.000054987362,0.000057822876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034390387,0.00005801544,0.00014432354,0.000005446259,0.00046793235,0.000013154758,0.00010053025,0.000027481918,0.00011264118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004036536,0.000038570986,0.000045947938,0.00007421728,0.0005107669,0.000115029514,0.000044950262,0.00006360278,0.0000059334966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000963993,0.000140359,0.009378908,0.0030228454,0.00007479489,0.0000068773816,0.010669328,0.0000022081379,0.0003575739,0.9239451,0.046416067,0.005976298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004878757,0.000015764423,0.0033052983,0.00086956413,0.000055439996,0.000015510004,0.00020796551,0.0000012776045,0.000024080908,0.0009855927,0.99440575,0.000064992455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016436689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035984835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94798964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016681148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004326577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35990044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960694789","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1174","title":"When Secret Intelligence Becomes Evidence: Some Implications of Khadr and Charkaoui II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Intelligence analysis; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intelligence cycle; Psychology; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Military intelligence; History","score_opus":0.10335455861839292,"score_gpt":0.39145862303280926,"score_spread":0.2881040644144163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960694789","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007825604,0.68393165,0.00030802438,0.2771716,0.00028719087,0.0017369878,0.000031474163,0.00015052634,0.028556917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66727716,0.32826903,0.00037812206,0.0033160062,0.0001126436,0.000023042674,0.00000411348,0.0000060423195,0.0006138262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983828,0.00017158983,0.00045716087,0.0003081622,0.00037024647,0.00031002137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987747,0.00023090134,0.0001769431,0.0004019938,0.00023608502,0.00017938693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014362436,0.00014746726,0.00041376735,0.000029118311,0.00051165256,0.000044995086,0.00051206653,0.000068709356,0.00064667896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004548234,0.00013143095,0.00011885109,0.00021818973,0.00042725063,0.0007195644,0.00008680148,0.00012777386,0.000035338493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004038341,0.000039405062,0.00051805313,0.00076933374,0.00000910002,0.0000011022242,0.001471712,1.875318e-7,0.00012167369,0.95405406,0.011818966,0.031192398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046700356,0.00020136566,0.0036393262,0.010841465,0.00019489169,0.000011119362,0.00025096905,0.000003872319,0.00019186441,0.12921835,0.8550594,0.000340716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014950832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014091639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049720053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012947887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70806813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964458389","doi":"10.7202/1017521ar","title":"Dunsmuir’s Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Winnipeg Regional Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.09913062218168837,"score_gpt":0.3615921520979623,"score_spread":0.2624615299162739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964458389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008009641,0.009527033,0.00007804997,0.051000662,0.0013907168,0.0006774876,0.00004140594,0.00004986834,0.92922515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8690551,0.12604895,0.0013099572,0.0026598054,0.00031370978,0.000012855845,0.0000012557055,0.00001656879,0.00058180944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789745,0.0002716605,0.00046933774,0.00014744814,0.0008889681,0.0003251215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984147,0.00031143,0.00023062715,0.00020420976,0.0005291367,0.00030992893],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014871277,0.00010756555,0.00029761693,0.00003820313,0.0022870784,0.00006633675,0.0003729908,0.000059626895,0.005527647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008889338,0.00008103008,0.00014957391,0.00019535812,0.00020250001,0.00036216676,0.000038726463,0.0002623982,0.00031000262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007976044,0.00012881593,0.000048031565,0.00007727782,0.00003054839,0.000035190755,0.0005168401,0.000006898303,0.00013448781,0.60213757,0.10638257,0.29042202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013054174,0.00022031719,0.0000675434,0.001733896,0.000027445105,0.00001897839,0.00049213757,5.130656e-7,0.0003679514,0.004101965,0.99273604,0.000102675025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014789761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006813668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92864335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014776681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004062309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964723810","doi":"10.7202/017258ar","title":"Le droit pénal de l’environnement : une garantie d'impunité ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Sanctions; CLARITY; Law; Statutory law; Criminal law; Multitude; Politics; Political science; Trespass; State (computer science); Environmental law; Subject (documents); Business","score_opus":0.2425476848064619,"score_gpt":0.3897422239212053,"score_spread":0.14719453911474337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964723810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7952769,0.0006177344,0.0011283017,0.05301639,0.00022895228,0.00017180554,0.000002201434,0.00024473248,0.14931303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492794,0.00037239955,0.0013785504,0.0009213751,0.00037639303,0.000013624404,0.0000025833851,0.000008842189,0.0019982911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986492,0.00008781572,0.00017332079,0.00023637331,0.00025712533,0.00059620093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994338,0.00011100316,0.000050962517,0.00022653375,0.00003682191,0.00014085635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004356147,0.000107351196,0.0001356425,0.00004754694,0.000640891,0.00006208813,0.00044755935,0.00011686906,0.00036908756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023026578,0.00011279078,0.00007675274,0.00011552502,0.00051476475,0.00021575925,0.00007966537,0.00015912142,0.00047864765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028196167,0.00019620398,0.0017133292,0.0000185451,0.00001621711,0.00004526346,0.0056842966,0.00009717113,0.0011185022,0.6349659,0.008097623,0.3480188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025533608,0.00007874086,0.015804466,0.000022304064,0.00004403015,0.000006121325,0.0092293555,0.000044507724,0.0025130264,0.014628548,0.95712024,0.0002533344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064978064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057595097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9490226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017726225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034933537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964798335","doi":"10.7202/1026922ar","title":"L’incrimination du financement du terrorisme en droits canadien et suisse","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014901269573643256,"score_gpt":0.2619158710796743,"score_spread":0.24701460150603102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964798335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79339063,0.0009023792,0.0012788363,0.1137301,0.0022270342,0.00038671817,0.000030178868,0.00007194008,0.08798217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645403,0.0017533001,0.0004822342,0.000921294,0.002063809,0.000044590994,0.000025675079,0.00003136499,0.030137444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973155,0.00053496537,0.00041729896,0.00049961515,0.00037278474,0.00085979403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984925,0.00041029224,0.00021927858,0.00035213016,0.00015815737,0.00036768863],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022847592,0.0002079056,0.00035247311,0.00008719913,0.0004696744,0.00012709295,0.0005363626,0.0002631329,0.0004467575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008171902,0.00032761644,0.00016159378,0.00034005332,0.00028038133,0.000547937,0.00009806698,0.00029429543,0.00044602546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025833086,0.00018323422,0.012455656,0.00036317916,0.000026099891,0.00015205097,0.034054182,0.0002414001,0.00011663378,0.8933296,0.01305685,0.045995265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005000795,0.00044062635,0.04387529,0.0008844589,0.00023967047,0.00012680251,0.00347606,0.006096099,0.00019700418,0.064560376,0.8788228,0.0007807595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057538208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07382246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8657659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013818085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025921466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964881625","doi":"10.7202/1027996ar","title":"Peines minimales obligatoires et exemptions constitutionnelles : la politique du pire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecology","score_opus":0.023811212593317574,"score_gpt":0.28921867564253495,"score_spread":0.26540746304921736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964881625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52422285,0.0041545425,0.0020339848,0.14273447,0.0010532874,0.00025936894,0.00008550364,0.0001683369,0.32528767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975545,0.006190238,0.00094710354,0.0007832227,0.0017397976,0.000036837282,0.000015864758,0.000022428354,0.014719505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763644,0.00069273595,0.00037214576,0.0004054873,0.0002356313,0.00065755035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801314,0.0010298331,0.0001585818,0.0002973575,0.000151734,0.00034935208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011351629,0.00019555893,0.00034217312,0.00008897575,0.00074452476,0.00019890454,0.00040778043,0.0003020709,0.0003619703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010613069,0.00028891733,0.00023888439,0.00032912128,0.0020364926,0.00068043644,0.00008808743,0.00027979104,0.00038437842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009834236,0.00011123521,0.012616027,0.00024565365,0.000019317307,0.00004597223,0.0045198356,0.00009464952,0.00012516748,0.97181624,0.007345892,0.0030501916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025308022,0.00009543104,0.016733944,0.0014127549,0.00015930113,0.0002581751,0.0037628976,0.00069496187,0.00013987753,0.35770836,0.61824983,0.00053138094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074749026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072971038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61410785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023384405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004004313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966391573","doi":"10.7202/043248ar","title":"La nature non purement privée d'un devoir et l'article 844 du Code de procédure civile","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009013353517548534,"score_gpt":0.2763487014162077,"score_spread":0.2673353478986592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966391573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912614,0.0036540804,0.0023769944,0.0647605,0.0003436859,0.00036218067,0.000027840848,0.00010153794,0.03711177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97588974,0.0008748386,0.004116428,0.0049784244,0.0008034706,0.00004333952,0.0000065018075,0.00003567486,0.013251601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973365,0.00042355558,0.0002986545,0.00043785622,0.00056599575,0.0009374068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879545,0.0002905863,0.00013178293,0.0002778289,0.00009976002,0.00040457182],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017987236,0.00025815048,0.00025904583,0.000049963503,0.0006544494,0.0001979503,0.0005273294,0.0009921088,0.0005644934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032537978,0.00028655404,0.0001740641,0.00038656432,0.000935822,0.0004827242,0.00007488597,0.0014347053,0.00025839906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014398414,0.0007607386,0.016708912,0.00037195056,0.0001479508,0.00032758873,0.12360861,0.0010536312,0.003628201,0.70869744,0.042588435,0.101962574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056409097,0.00013712783,0.016753485,0.00033824265,0.00021554042,0.0001128011,0.008667286,0.0015215763,0.009939062,0.013616295,0.94756734,0.00056715717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008874628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015087456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9049789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019408363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041050016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966850877","doi":"10.7202/042370ar","title":"La rétroactivité d'une loi à caractère criminel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Statute; Interpretation (philosophy); Duty; Law; Criminal code; Order (exchange); Political science; Criminal law; Computer science; Legislation; Business","score_opus":0.01942687439225597,"score_gpt":0.292251129255248,"score_spread":0.272824254862992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966850877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8135749,0.00019940182,0.0011431205,0.0075111575,0.00009550923,0.000089575384,0.000004097801,0.000108038475,0.17727418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807883,0.00012083225,0.00085054745,0.00077080063,0.000479782,0.000009976462,0.0000023267658,0.000013994411,0.016963447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882704,0.00013140602,0.00012550833,0.00020664804,0.00029444782,0.00041496925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999257,0.00029763504,0.000053495663,0.00016903838,0.000037772515,0.00018502181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056574185,0.00010495696,0.00014157053,0.000048023045,0.00043237017,0.000091130794,0.00027079097,0.00023175134,0.00016806887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002501698,0.00011412391,0.00009613347,0.00018577593,0.0005447828,0.00030230236,0.00001904571,0.0003591599,0.00014326458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082696824,0.00017314042,0.003195695,0.000050564468,0.00004705296,0.0001380432,0.10098999,0.00013304115,0.0020318346,0.45021278,0.014088293,0.42885685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019190025,0.000029560242,0.009512017,0.00003160862,0.00006224411,0.000021693753,0.013292685,0.00006791529,0.000866309,0.007952868,0.9676879,0.00028330972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075674555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008985904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000618285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012440709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966956664","doi":"10.7202/043235ar","title":"Les défis du droit pénal de l'environnement : les régimes de responsabilité pénale de Sault Ste-Marie à Wholesale Travel","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015710801554566285,"score_gpt":0.2648371682708408,"score_spread":0.24912636671627453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966956664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178262,0.009360644,0.0171733,0.045592982,0.0002608883,0.0004186746,0.0001130635,0.00012732082,0.009126944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91693354,0.0031303198,0.01102102,0.0013779006,0.001390095,0.0000799903,0.00001681122,0.0000800071,0.065970324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940458,0.0013094948,0.000765577,0.00087302085,0.0008839005,0.0021222266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959318,0.0021576653,0.00028761558,0.0005759017,0.000110398,0.0009366024],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004208411,0.00055742695,0.00062317774,0.00016725653,0.001959189,0.00033444748,0.0010976658,0.00106253,0.0018263119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014964781,0.00068539404,0.0005323982,0.0004674011,0.0036893217,0.0005651597,0.0001332672,0.0012827124,0.0002177324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068259385,0.0010755435,0.067565985,0.00043777493,0.00027821588,0.0003461977,0.088385,0.0031944488,0.0055782753,0.41739306,0.007060893,0.40800202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012870074,0.0005190632,0.11602046,0.0006318151,0.0008347412,0.00019938005,0.04585046,0.00418064,0.005902553,0.040409386,0.7825261,0.0016384359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036092322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033523645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7754652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008896771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001037975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968418547","doi":"10.7202/1002078ar","title":"Les droits et libertés à l’heure de la dérogation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche sociologique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3547984232970642,"score_gpt":0.4687723894405342,"score_spread":0.11397396614347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968418547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4479844,0.0069652395,0.009788435,0.011727064,0.00047007372,0.0002637912,0.000011615288,0.00020140523,0.52258795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89081997,0.027129242,0.03330078,0.0022199426,0.00039246868,0.00005399125,0.000008975847,0.000038107715,0.046036515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697245,0.028790493,0.0002552914,0.00036082815,0.0001598236,0.0007091123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912866,0.007944151,0.0001603865,0.00021152358,0.00011511227,0.00028227823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025635816,0.00023786536,0.00027108914,0.000042935822,0.00045009336,0.000058997113,0.00048341704,0.007835134,0.00055363006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010492495,0.00025030805,0.00020647896,0.0002963779,0.003411674,0.0003190308,0.000042684824,0.005652548,0.00012013193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030119205,0.000091923175,0.0033911206,0.000070103946,0.000043126598,0.000038553077,0.18656199,0.0000065070726,0.00035278682,0.7775865,0.0019310603,0.029896183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027443093,0.00031963235,0.013924411,0.00028870208,0.00019858223,0.000062445586,0.062396068,0.000088579276,0.0024394728,0.7770921,0.14225572,0.00065987435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006190343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053793326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47655147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026965681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014018668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969351015","doi":"10.7202/039837ar","title":"La Loi sur l’immunité des États canadienne et la torture","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Torture; Philosophy; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.036683292972897776,"score_gpt":0.31576733022498904,"score_spread":0.27908403725209124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969351015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56328523,0.0017567733,0.000007847734,0.009698284,0.0034674837,0.000070111266,0.00006505852,0.000027947874,0.42162126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903384,0.0019524862,0.0006981204,0.0006554212,0.0007886044,0.000002343612,0.0000018798366,0.000029400428,0.0055333497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712497,0.0010059176,0.0003610069,0.00022161765,0.00040769108,0.0008788124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764866,0.0007931264,0.00020136959,0.0002304142,0.00032580283,0.0008006028],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00357547,0.00024367173,0.00027560693,0.000050352493,0.0058498373,0.00034673885,0.000623321,0.00041032716,0.0019509911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049771706,0.00022649142,0.00020384401,0.00027123856,0.0018763345,0.0010129627,0.00009311025,0.0022213708,0.00012172164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025237528,0.00012850949,0.0004900796,0.00004091496,0.0000476277,0.0008864403,0.004471888,0.000014086674,0.0004269361,0.88848543,0.0017720754,0.10321076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022585424,0.000087090295,0.0030966909,0.00024046554,0.000082917046,0.0022428797,0.0027446283,0.000008968415,0.00012284284,0.010013433,0.9808513,0.00028292663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27804995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94874066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97907925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018909978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013777943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970983722","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831","title":"The Law in Undercover Policing: A Comparative Study of Entrapment and Covert Interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Entrapment; Interview; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.13727744968855873,"score_gpt":0.4025959515357165,"score_spread":0.2653185018471578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970983722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92815644,0.05176073,3.493145e-7,0.007529308,0.00008160572,0.0009223752,0.0000018352558,0.000004838176,0.011542546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98389834,0.014888041,0.0000036368676,0.0009970346,0.000008360195,0.000011142539,3.163587e-7,0.0000027294645,0.00019041981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877256,0.00037677246,0.00033583114,0.00013694569,0.00019441424,0.00018349115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948967,0.00021619904,0.000082130755,0.00012697944,0.00002531032,0.000059703125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007279835,0.00008899799,0.00032624148,0.000015824975,0.00016654546,0.00004251652,0.00016548972,0.000009958418,0.000011297139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018313276,0.000064160144,0.000015690937,0.00031661216,0.00022976192,0.00011326917,0.00007946812,0.0001280706,9.256021e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028297854,0.00032728878,0.040249586,0.0011577838,0.000033312754,0.000051834762,0.028541667,0.000036678397,0.0000077127015,0.92577064,0.0013280278,0.0024671722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001194809,0.00022224242,0.06376894,0.018366095,0.0001033993,0.000005028555,0.010909257,0.000002570312,0.00003909053,0.004675653,0.90031195,0.00040096132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.921095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014594875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008651078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26163748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971757365","doi":"10.7202/043815ar","title":"Échanger est-il péché ? Analyse de la norme de tolérance de la société canadienne contemporaine à la lumière de l’arrêt R. c. Labaye","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012408878495376233,"score_gpt":0.2871082939695794,"score_spread":0.2746994154742031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971757365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8996746,0.005661251,0.0023167997,0.021822004,0.00021464015,0.00023036066,0.00012788564,0.000116564566,0.06983591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9348151,0.0019691756,0.0050918846,0.0036059383,0.0012755147,0.000054038483,0.000013499749,0.00006361062,0.05311121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948049,0.0015974294,0.00049484393,0.0005742922,0.00038540259,0.0021431055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958919,0.0021338838,0.00027634838,0.0003848631,0.00012382379,0.0011891699],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005527332,0.00042152134,0.0005642753,0.00013350928,0.00088092743,0.00030778116,0.00079376437,0.0011036168,0.00042352118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014517192,0.00051117694,0.0003544831,0.0006693184,0.0032312546,0.00046853168,0.000069722635,0.0012324089,0.00008370019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033296956,0.0006689203,0.063869126,0.00059798686,0.00060544256,0.0031791355,0.2827051,0.002094305,0.00642764,0.44437194,0.044492368,0.15065506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009684057,0.00012072927,0.012540036,0.00036264173,0.0005019125,0.0004888309,0.024880057,0.0030025872,0.0008225998,0.022955159,0.93249106,0.0008659872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16016318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3359078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8879987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065907855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018833489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973073041","doi":"10.7202/043535ar","title":"Paramètres d'un véhicule procédural efficace","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015334352095450705,"score_gpt":0.2737350164118932,"score_spread":0.2584006643164425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973073041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89502615,0.013250594,0.001147407,0.06253379,0.0006164711,0.00026880292,0.000015244854,0.00013454918,0.027006999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85360247,0.00086667883,0.0028531768,0.0015130452,0.0013980874,0.000020356229,0.0000046706027,0.000023629727,0.13971788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771804,0.00022837758,0.0002874114,0.00039656245,0.00045164695,0.00091794186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988702,0.00031425623,0.000117016694,0.00025034367,0.000069647256,0.00037856976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064695574,0.00023119613,0.00026374139,0.00004542165,0.0008001345,0.00013619578,0.00048930856,0.00049244263,0.0011924179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029394482,0.0002577238,0.00020474098,0.00032637405,0.002232466,0.00042228165,0.000042292737,0.0006271738,0.0011398672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006077753,0.00023088332,0.000914597,0.00011445987,0.00006386332,0.00009056011,0.048352733,0.0006678121,0.00018254328,0.49688897,0.018261114,0.43417168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027122037,0.00007634274,0.0021146026,0.00014468783,0.00013366828,0.00003857797,0.0050291982,0.0007122663,0.0012960988,0.011488754,0.9782672,0.00042741373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022251084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00299165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96000606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011121889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014854665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973440412","doi":"10.7202/039342ar","title":"L’évolution à la pièce de la défense d’erreur de droit : l’erreur attribuable aux conseils inexacts d’un juriste ou aux jugements des tribunaux fut-elle laissée à la dérive ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025199577702375485,"score_gpt":0.30892025593363664,"score_spread":0.2837206782312612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973440412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197678,0.0024071555,0.0036144354,0.0048217173,0.0011759493,0.0005690378,0.00013491603,0.0002571426,0.067251876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94067734,0.0024733124,0.0022710252,0.0008526254,0.00076877204,0.00006203102,0.00003904566,0.00009806791,0.05275776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931266,0.0019636077,0.000790598,0.0009591755,0.00087800215,0.002282047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425256,0.0030364995,0.0004692628,0.0006982119,0.00040211686,0.0011413184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005664134,0.00065935816,0.0007515329,0.00022756569,0.002434042,0.0006450196,0.0011654127,0.0017350345,0.0004799754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00415841,0.000826781,0.00044567758,0.0010057768,0.0074365595,0.0008401219,0.00023138904,0.0024888217,0.00028205937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064324774,0.0014427953,0.024827616,0.00082097645,0.00045878897,0.0019185342,0.049204502,0.00046909825,0.014421645,0.82500905,0.032458473,0.04832527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019592135,0.00032679143,0.029727485,0.00062213134,0.0007773105,0.0007077023,0.0077231824,0.0019916333,0.0029691379,0.15587674,0.7959545,0.0013641227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016183715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7634961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023379752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024381028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973624887","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01174.x","title":"ACCès à information et reassignments personnel's: le précédent qéuébcois","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Commission; Mandate; Ethnology; Law; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.04713340604759006,"score_gpt":0.30047298034130515,"score_spread":0.2533395742937151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973624887","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044698372,0.0011537606,0.0015274413,0.55540186,0.0038956327,0.00076331117,0.00017548677,0.00007173241,0.39231244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98263055,0.00016621695,0.00030534505,0.0027081973,0.00021579558,0.000038076883,0.00014147449,0.000011672333,0.013782676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774736,0.0004145431,0.00038953006,0.00024671826,0.00048582332,0.0007160324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807656,0.00007740167,0.00019832006,0.00023438587,0.000240542,0.0011727947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011495606,0.00019466926,0.00015160402,0.00017606429,0.0010328651,0.0009235544,0.00026957775,0.00027819801,0.0015191624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009873332,0.0002441126,0.000083964944,0.0005251781,0.00029322898,0.0049745403,0.000010656801,0.0002169684,0.00061684323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036713693,0.000044630993,0.0005205905,0.00003140243,0.000015389316,0.000012735073,0.0057441825,9.167402e-7,0.0000034039624,0.9412683,0.040394768,0.011959966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016530922,0.0001087783,0.00046135986,0.000045292032,0.00002356391,0.000022641245,0.022743354,0.00007047818,0.000037168815,0.0013828506,0.97468007,0.00025911356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12021185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8411932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013975917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014188675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975058548","doi":"10.7202/043592ar","title":"La version française des lois constitutionnelles du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00880620046958429,"score_gpt":0.22686979448509031,"score_spread":0.218063594015506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975058548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90436727,0.00911614,0.0012878401,0.013475382,0.0006698269,0.00009220042,0.000038256498,0.000037264403,0.0709158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713909,0.002226844,0.0007740077,0.000804647,0.0005767277,0.0000037811333,0.000004844084,0.000009519837,0.024208704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985842,0.00018062952,0.00017829642,0.0002301613,0.0003390645,0.00048764903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989774,0.0004525687,0.00006350224,0.00013357121,0.00007405922,0.00029887195],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047343687,0.00014839854,0.00016380621,0.00003188176,0.00116797,0.00006720117,0.00027513911,0.0002985241,0.0011960143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031649138,0.0001748062,0.00008968857,0.00023700773,0.003642597,0.00032305572,0.000029178977,0.00035140797,0.00018618011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056499513,0.0001010173,0.005961486,0.00014128162,0.000048866255,0.000376523,0.061998453,0.0011299386,0.00007871006,0.70011604,0.0919798,0.13801138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019188515,0.000019579695,0.0010489488,0.0001417001,0.00007622136,0.00005898516,0.012380717,0.00021951314,0.00018106103,0.0031874285,0.98227155,0.00022242109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8685099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9472247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89029175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041752723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011522368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976297784","doi":"10.7202/042330ar","title":"Les ordonnances de dédommagement et de restitution en droit pénal canadien","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Restitution; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Constitutional court; Parliament; Paragraph; Criminal code; Compensation (psychology); Criminal law; Constitution; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.01808691012837414,"score_gpt":0.3124062173870811,"score_spread":0.2943193072587069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976297784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90434676,0.00027753544,0.0070151263,0.006881663,0.00010333361,0.00014542439,0.000008131658,0.000088487934,0.081133515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98509705,0.00034433894,0.0040457146,0.0010487846,0.0004468681,0.000024216946,0.0000048342395,0.000010407253,0.008977797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844235,0.00024649705,0.0001681525,0.00022624314,0.00030013188,0.0006166499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999296,0.00019419937,0.00006960356,0.00014697642,0.000043141816,0.00025004265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016191714,0.000112014655,0.00013099656,0.00006398663,0.00069110777,0.00011320742,0.0003601003,0.00018774011,0.00014720038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047147233,0.00012797672,0.0000714623,0.00014424333,0.0005048926,0.00028186667,0.00002702484,0.00031270063,0.000033950553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038991082,0.00003911709,0.010174247,0.000026949916,0.000020989508,0.00007877985,0.03883415,0.0008705018,0.00032229186,0.9020608,0.0032589503,0.044274233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029293803,0.0000845188,0.04453266,0.00012961107,0.00008049138,0.000033856406,0.009257895,0.00036617284,0.00056614855,0.036289196,0.9079698,0.00039670942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15658002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3581504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9047108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039901887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055816176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976545274","doi":"10.7202/1006418ar","title":"Les théories constitutionnelles de Louis-Philippe Pigeon : L’efficience du partage législatif des compétences et l’incrédulité face à la protection législative des droits fondamentaux","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09068385154578733,"score_gpt":0.31561329607460303,"score_spread":0.2249294445288157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976545274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4579866,0.0065217502,0.035079636,0.0040039783,0.0018266636,0.00080464553,0.00015746073,0.00017192836,0.49344736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896214,0.003124971,0.005978339,0.00012856875,0.00031661915,0.000029767574,0.0000023046891,0.000025987738,0.0007720321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952088,0.001640677,0.00073786854,0.000523829,0.000802927,0.0010859276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767435,0.0005490594,0.0005786157,0.00020487956,0.00051273627,0.00048036466],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031614879,0.00046544592,0.00046722812,0.00010379572,0.014055019,0.00050238194,0.00067455217,0.00030852295,0.0008500135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000565974,0.00042796854,0.0002670447,0.0005847306,0.011314864,0.002146857,0.00015969854,0.0008979993,0.00008072474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013121188,0.00039209658,0.006072318,0.000106548934,0.00008020872,0.00015707812,0.050373726,0.00062220433,0.0002061358,0.90943474,0.000050691964,0.032373026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010694155,0.0015235152,0.012086742,0.0031634357,0.00043115902,0.002532625,0.09185347,0.0011606022,0.004151478,0.33041498,0.5501533,0.0014592679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0615537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07891159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5790198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000686301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020776317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977244270","doi":"10.7202/042776ar","title":"La mise en oeuvre judiciaire de l'article 1 de la Charte canadienne et le droit de la preuve","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Legislature; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009023730935217982,"score_gpt":0.27488658256026205,"score_spread":0.2658628516250441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977244270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315246,0.00022956595,0.0008420074,0.0060560037,0.000034121906,0.000118349526,0.000011980533,0.00010839535,0.061074983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083614,0.00018199916,0.0010470635,0.0014791862,0.00025116868,0.000027557171,0.0000027311435,0.000025602632,0.006148544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762183,0.000880899,0.00016988377,0.00025526003,0.00020411542,0.000868004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982505,0.00095984805,0.000064617285,0.00019846107,0.00003255093,0.00049405935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031167476,0.00013878805,0.00017524353,0.000055658318,0.00052491215,0.00016063676,0.00039602426,0.0004210744,0.000099429235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076390774,0.00016817774,0.00010159344,0.00019147024,0.0008900739,0.0002561778,0.000033164837,0.0005745349,0.000035010937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078357065,0.00019565783,0.013065298,0.000051686704,0.000055377295,0.0004113803,0.31187692,0.00053243956,0.004186541,0.6049674,0.006165366,0.05841357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010032906,0.00010101791,0.07937936,0.00019916995,0.00016777517,0.00023866244,0.04243676,0.0012862359,0.0034894822,0.10692386,0.76404554,0.00072884513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12470161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2209582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75788015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024017133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008196613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88112706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977413935","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2000.18068","title":"La surveillance vidéo et le droit à la vie privée au Canada et au Québec : l'impact des chartes des droits et l'exclusion de la preuve","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022798317141870098,"score_gpt":0.3155657898430508,"score_spread":0.2927674727011807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977413935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8444277,0.0022670894,0.00046927246,0.008310888,0.00024555484,0.00021492271,0.00018533977,0.000064989115,0.14381425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258454,0.002420925,0.00041778391,0.0005522635,0.00041216894,0.000036787453,0.000054228418,0.00004736179,0.013473951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955698,0.0019188585,0.0005304776,0.0005125018,0.00066077727,0.00080757047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943568,0.0044186697,0.00025546103,0.00029791877,0.0002395972,0.00043154447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032986132,0.00035237544,0.00047374205,0.00009130296,0.00059240364,0.0003127662,0.0008754074,0.00024609896,0.0006551982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010532252,0.00042936244,0.0002456905,0.0003296186,0.0011249216,0.00071657903,0.00014152951,0.00060297747,0.0000817151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001589049,0.0006680784,0.5612227,0.00038292643,0.00023039016,0.00035363948,0.03869292,0.010148887,0.00022396346,0.32819045,0.0032856914,0.056441486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000446404,0.000082800376,0.6714832,0.0014425219,0.000041097395,0.0004610331,0.00075612334,0.003296429,0.00010340384,0.018266661,0.30312407,0.00049622275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30992377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008087675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010601157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978067332","doi":"10.7202/043531ar","title":"Les moyens alternatifs de résolution de conflits en matière civile et commerciale dans une perspective de réforme du Code de procédure civile","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.018098583035754175,"score_gpt":0.30957313243790996,"score_spread":0.2914745494021558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978067332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8285259,0.0020674653,0.037291806,0.056306537,0.00023934981,0.00053034985,0.0002833616,0.00017436159,0.074580885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97152513,0.0015312823,0.0046677296,0.0023873437,0.0012679112,0.00008039454,0.00002653346,0.000060027072,0.01845363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962498,0.0007852302,0.0004146281,0.0005207202,0.00050580356,0.0015238402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980395,0.0006760568,0.00024408694,0.00029562498,0.00021771278,0.0005270125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020045945,0.00037980932,0.00042697595,0.00010539458,0.001199789,0.00020695385,0.0007300232,0.00075694016,0.00044747314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006701933,0.00046383278,0.00025407167,0.00044052032,0.001584221,0.0006232756,0.00008996963,0.0010862908,0.00009925464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099343735,0.00028362396,0.017389737,0.0001781132,0.000106913016,0.00010699161,0.3949247,0.0021613429,0.0018754174,0.56801385,0.0074678673,0.0073920945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016793791,0.0004914874,0.09522401,0.0012513069,0.00084025005,0.0007513972,0.23248973,0.025897318,0.0062142545,0.111702465,0.5216309,0.0018275148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15256809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27051058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.514163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014745978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001179477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980266038","doi":"10.7202/1027577ar","title":"L’évolution de la primauté du droit comme principe constitutionnel et sa relation avec le pouvoir exécutif en matière de renseignements confidentiels","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.020730553198779478,"score_gpt":0.2781573885644218,"score_spread":0.2574268353656423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980266038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5747417,0.00054584054,0.059143767,0.014339363,0.0009951085,0.00063940947,0.0000433546,0.00017621116,0.34937522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747228,0.0007854234,0.0030705428,0.0008064918,0.0010973836,0.000047658465,0.00005430294,0.00003380471,0.019381607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958673,0.0016917182,0.000627816,0.00050096185,0.0004333667,0.00087881094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766624,0.0010180591,0.0003823271,0.0004173987,0.00016901722,0.00034696938],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00453148,0.0002474287,0.0004142225,0.000112125395,0.0008964969,0.00026167743,0.0005010575,0.0005710865,0.0004433923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015516408,0.00040177203,0.00022051144,0.00035540882,0.0012656179,0.00083571917,0.00012533154,0.000565985,0.00044935232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044331126,0.0002415618,0.012085868,0.00034543395,0.0000502625,0.00005371631,0.019344382,0.00070704904,0.0010359823,0.9574387,0.00335569,0.005297004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015568008,0.00022103122,0.14360034,0.0022152457,0.00045325432,0.0007023466,0.003322259,0.01620098,0.0009253836,0.63531595,0.19445467,0.0010317499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011571705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024796913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39998105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026426816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009855491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981435008","doi":"10.7202/042509ar","title":"Le devoir d'équité procédurale et le contrôle judiciaire ou quasi judiciaire de la procédure administrative","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Commission; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Res judicata; Civil procedure; Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Computer science","score_opus":0.01951758786633224,"score_gpt":0.3251546570569234,"score_spread":0.3056370691905912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981435008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6775461,0.0011579145,0.0027833662,0.07029195,0.00008759569,0.00078966387,0.000026488018,0.0003905231,0.2469264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889232,0.00014304544,0.0016097542,0.0021219752,0.00040927596,0.000097567245,0.000009690436,0.00003205304,0.0066534556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976458,0.0004437366,0.00029602164,0.0004010889,0.00046803677,0.00074530556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987078,0.00045325278,0.00016417893,0.00022560883,0.00013211017,0.0003170927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013975753,0.00021408222,0.0003165155,0.00006540672,0.0012616277,0.00019980564,0.00047706286,0.0004469967,0.0000496894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008874612,0.00024698276,0.00014974701,0.0002906337,0.0014414367,0.00054849207,0.000039777093,0.0006499413,0.00004939954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092955,0.000423326,0.0011539398,0.000056585122,0.000047057256,0.00005956061,0.032931507,0.00003606157,0.0006234407,0.9367665,0.005323201,0.022485834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020608888,0.0004265785,0.013927361,0.00048794612,0.00019150462,0.00009620344,0.088960946,0.0002161709,0.008240053,0.12107287,0.7630696,0.0012498529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062347446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039973296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8156937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064869947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025019627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983117274","doi":"10.7202/042511ar","title":"Le contrôle judiciaire de la procédure administrative : éléments de droit comparé, fédéral, ontarien et québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Law; Judicial review; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01947120545434634,"score_gpt":0.318233499905877,"score_spread":0.2987622944515307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983117274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85292953,0.00025584016,0.001401026,0.007768523,0.00005339006,0.00030759288,0.000019932306,0.00012979379,0.13713439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899482,0.00010607497,0.0014720425,0.0030983915,0.00020368796,0.00004961516,0.00001076542,0.000020007803,0.005091208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801445,0.0003594425,0.00024196842,0.0003179276,0.0003714348,0.0006947887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988642,0.00039309319,0.00012713582,0.00018916349,0.00007051454,0.00035594305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011335879,0.00017459062,0.0002708582,0.000047571193,0.0008505414,0.00018178846,0.00043647317,0.00031919847,0.00009929635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035845273,0.00020924199,0.00012464852,0.00017786419,0.0010504666,0.00035507343,0.00003325211,0.0005627984,0.000039672937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014964915,0.000291763,0.011365596,0.000031765823,0.00006930794,0.00010539502,0.1228351,0.000098517856,0.00042922434,0.8503862,0.0055150404,0.008722458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012599833,0.0002746929,0.039251104,0.00020938482,0.00015822273,0.00007075122,0.0693666,0.0002624621,0.0021748508,0.081772745,0.80441123,0.00078796834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11443163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44376418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7988962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017721064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002345571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8914654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983507877","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0040","title":"Protecting Research Confidentiality : Towards a Research-Participant Shield Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16546054858457637,"score_gpt":0.403462653446372,"score_spread":0.23800210486179563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983507877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7544663,0.016268771,0.00005040146,0.0841103,0.0028808573,0.0008107192,0.00014535675,0.000017192016,0.14125009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807894,0.0006915296,0.00026225272,0.0015808669,0.0028425492,0.000023548588,0.0000050599456,0.000049445043,0.013755339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916185,0.002723234,0.0011296589,0.0005941093,0.0008513631,0.0030831385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216986,0.0015153674,0.00040766093,0.00040006425,0.002311497,0.0031955347],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029170372,0.00032575504,0.00079414225,0.00016574207,0.0056606825,0.0009656197,0.0008785356,0.00066891726,0.00055195985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012532256,0.00037977993,0.0005951238,0.0010124008,0.00826945,0.0010195607,0.00010246395,0.0038097696,0.00001996894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001556558,0.000040091505,0.00007002489,0.00032103615,0.00011150041,0.00044009235,0.11375547,0.000018807508,0.00008450595,0.8742012,0.00885746,0.002084259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050188845,0.00041644153,0.0003797789,0.001262848,0.0001760962,0.0002884854,0.16828467,0.00007254676,0.00010482512,0.17870809,0.6493394,0.0004649635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97400975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6954931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030821613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066355034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984670992","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086147","title":"On the Book of Job, Justice, and The Precariousness of the Criminal Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Law; Injustice; Political science; Mythology; Economic Justice; Subject (documents); Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04706356449537347,"score_gpt":0.27024415678036434,"score_spread":0.22318059228499088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984670992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111311726,0.0068874722,0.0000018043837,0.00453774,0.0002315019,0.0004560208,0.000009709856,0.000014028247,0.87655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96705437,0.0010175509,0.0000022550066,0.0033803957,0.00015300365,0.000014779984,2.431601e-7,0.000003937066,0.028373457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989933,0.00034108016,0.0001427364,0.0000918252,0.00030089877,0.0001301978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988715,0.0007242567,0.000106324194,0.00019554337,0.00008886721,0.000013520156],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000539493,0.000092230795,0.00016910765,0.000004338334,0.0030054788,0.00008689914,0.00035851554,0.000044757446,0.000046954727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080999074,0.000030972325,0.00007994599,0.00004217611,0.01106966,0.00011657694,0.000080286765,0.00015620822,0.0000013564127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010102492,0.000008075165,0.0000066643165,0.000036707504,0.000015352955,4.5319263e-7,0.15526849,8.959463e-7,0.0000059928193,0.8432908,0.0012511659,0.000014364721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088614615,0.00007990012,0.00045255877,0.0001762504,0.0006526585,0.00001711673,0.10341752,0.000005391437,0.0004181063,0.16639024,0.7273693,0.00013480367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012010725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020536097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85574263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062061426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027738628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984726440","doi":"10.7202/043540ar","title":"De certaines tendances en matière de petites créances","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012897054051089377,"score_gpt":0.27945449133245864,"score_spread":0.26655743728136927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984726440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71136004,0.035677038,0.0018042926,0.092349626,0.0007173767,0.00023321125,0.00004102871,0.00016851797,0.15764886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73715544,0.0071137147,0.009720161,0.001963229,0.0033489354,0.000028774684,0.0000042288752,0.000027894817,0.24063762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756634,0.00034977036,0.00029534535,0.00035444868,0.00037393943,0.0010601776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984907,0.00079422054,0.00012878547,0.00019806504,0.00006936429,0.00031887897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00107612,0.000246414,0.00029618075,0.000067423396,0.0007444774,0.00023788668,0.00061950827,0.00042758093,0.0016110002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005566198,0.0002657317,0.00018979752,0.00034390684,0.001716471,0.0005884226,0.0000401991,0.00049391843,0.00031927085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058167483,0.00014911607,0.019515978,0.00043957456,0.00008592891,0.00011373673,0.11666155,0.0006017485,0.0008172319,0.4977929,0.018567123,0.34519696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013942904,0.000074251184,0.00597513,0.00037023998,0.00012369885,0.000061070205,0.017990924,0.0007452525,0.000835927,0.043058887,0.9302281,0.00039705567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011967354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013938514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020140118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032644998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985094360","doi":"10.15209/vulj.v3i1.27","title":"The Growing Acknowledgement of Wrongful Conviction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University Law and Justice Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Griffith University","keywords":"Conviction; Innocence; Appeal; Acknowledgement; Criminal justice; Political science; Commission; Law; Human rights; Royal Commission; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.014055492732978616,"score_gpt":0.2517591540860538,"score_spread":0.2377036613530752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985094360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7277523,0.00067632506,0.0010330637,0.01441759,0.0077859173,0.0002983543,0.0000028432903,0.000042815594,0.24799076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630165,0.001119553,0.00010267509,0.00007988122,0.00062185986,9.163173e-8,1.443427e-7,0.0000020277712,0.0017721205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937814,0.00011809396,0.00009080832,0.00006254497,0.0001941288,0.00015626618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991889,0.00021108998,0.00008287058,0.00005302751,0.00034787107,0.00011625816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045550097,0.000044613073,0.00006642016,0.000021408046,0.0019840735,0.00011092668,0.00015676871,0.000039371796,0.00015843395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009056959,0.00003538561,0.000032476073,0.000098940436,0.00027296782,0.0008824941,0.000040862422,0.00012058229,0.000021084928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035665624,0.000023422866,0.0005248654,0.000025595304,0.00003128672,0.000005937244,0.0059751505,0.0000059138865,0.00051657937,0.9844429,0.0067659263,0.0016467654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019659518,0.00004497084,0.0010924905,0.000033243698,0.00015192843,0.0000049734954,0.04497911,0.000025026637,0.00003689934,0.0013626008,0.95201266,0.000059477607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024163327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017607303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98308027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008118166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000745809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985908656","doi":"10.7202/043537ar","title":"La simplification des procédures spéciales d'administration de la preuve","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02974109185936472,"score_gpt":0.33114762451499785,"score_spread":0.3014065326556331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985908656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91840744,0.0030114243,0.009806396,0.007654546,0.00013713345,0.00022971274,0.000015026707,0.00009392511,0.06064438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725869,0.0012246049,0.004442534,0.00028028208,0.00088574516,0.000030910232,0.000009083328,0.000018697387,0.020521242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981024,0.0006441875,0.00024471438,0.00027153376,0.00026507862,0.00047204678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868625,0.0007520267,0.00012986515,0.0001577577,0.00007029857,0.00020379665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001501844,0.00015783936,0.00014869787,0.000047810507,0.00066818966,0.0002487724,0.00027831527,0.0006069285,0.00012690862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007322046,0.0001896564,0.000099579855,0.00025081594,0.0030155128,0.00047907984,0.00001616796,0.0004347782,0.000091202404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006007486,0.00018877925,0.0028018914,0.00018709591,0.000025740886,0.000026794762,0.060435537,0.0001921585,0.0014912855,0.6519487,0.002870189,0.27977175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022061386,0.00014738717,0.029534277,0.00026186695,0.00018958923,0.00012569885,0.0126091,0.0005226716,0.0051578735,0.14568323,0.80510944,0.0004382633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013830506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043245633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80223924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020154133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058779825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986495945","doi":"10.7202/1026911ar","title":"La complicité par omission : une analyse critique de l’arrêt Rochon c. La Reine","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01989264987192252,"score_gpt":0.30568797239981144,"score_spread":0.2857953225278889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986495945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73168683,0.0025711465,0.008793086,0.053779926,0.00049059046,0.0002813667,0.000022662989,0.00015911469,0.20221525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98103744,0.0016909717,0.0017601252,0.00074485334,0.0012186209,0.00001917802,0.000013026533,0.00003759732,0.013478172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966278,0.0013061131,0.00043410299,0.000497038,0.00029964506,0.000835323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976845,0.0010045795,0.00018447347,0.00044253434,0.00011868405,0.0005652476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002388276,0.00021733504,0.00048106865,0.000085110354,0.00047930196,0.00016760893,0.00054517965,0.00048383395,0.00032741443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082712487,0.00031479294,0.00026739558,0.00065929466,0.000586779,0.00032513821,0.0000939945,0.0005574156,0.00028078735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013958523,0.00045173508,0.013567471,0.0012592555,0.00008447765,0.0005280548,0.014775313,0.0011453804,0.01056208,0.85674363,0.02161535,0.07912765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006832052,0.00027843972,0.022913544,0.0028148396,0.0004906711,0.00043807525,0.0031409094,0.011416671,0.0018939859,0.27532607,0.6796355,0.00096809806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011825728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041217566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65802014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004128285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019716477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987359688","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0014","title":"The Logic of the Rule of Law: Lessons from Willis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Skepticism; CLARITY; Rule of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03158620901448495,"score_gpt":0.28454818479866695,"score_spread":0.252961975784182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987359688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3004466,0.0046970127,0.00015612281,0.03978611,0.00050834886,0.00013721803,0.000056803285,0.000011552362,0.65420026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754024,0.00092036044,0.00041024515,0.000058687303,0.00009705049,8.897258e-9,1.4897303e-7,0.0000014356227,0.00097181665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992647,0.00013635124,0.00010847927,0.00005588968,0.00031307607,0.000121492485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928886,0.00016575631,0.00022253733,0.00012878006,0.00013909879,0.000054943786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038850028,0.00004138586,0.0001065578,0.0000031836578,0.0011405929,0.000014986683,0.00063273904,0.000042962405,0.00060771545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032774347,0.000028056287,0.00013298588,0.000018955561,0.000910809,0.00033574348,0.00007319215,0.00008699637,0.000002145765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000704158,0.000064476226,0.0006418964,0.0000039943225,0.00004801931,0.0000024750327,0.02592904,0.00005225708,0.00057519635,0.9640676,0.0024451353,0.00609949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023103757,0.000039427967,0.0060793213,0.00007126508,0.00007714485,0.000001978324,0.02851801,0.00001036192,0.000562051,0.006226261,0.9581196,0.00006354214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4027876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7151228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95784134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013660415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007420384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87726337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987899877","doi":"10.7202/042507ar","title":"Les erreurs de droit dans l'exercice d'une compétence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Allegation; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.021789314995727397,"score_gpt":0.2959621394531882,"score_spread":0.27417282445746083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987899877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89958715,0.0003384527,0.011906136,0.004992942,0.00012864938,0.0001588154,0.000007652138,0.00018661728,0.08269357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831485,0.0003289711,0.0041137408,0.00080514833,0.00040843745,0.000017188428,0.000004299655,0.000020983593,0.011152742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812347,0.00014300745,0.0002255896,0.0003289444,0.00043318726,0.0007457878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989884,0.00026756173,0.00009167628,0.00026446045,0.00006544572,0.00032247204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008045699,0.00015840153,0.00021531552,0.00006241121,0.0009808996,0.00012445042,0.0006685151,0.0002663074,0.00017441144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027811577,0.00018954478,0.00012656985,0.0003560148,0.0010965504,0.0003106132,0.000036262416,0.00044632156,0.00014130412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009434723,0.00018428713,0.024659267,0.00006431723,0.000042662534,0.00014616252,0.15974104,0.0006548732,0.003872695,0.6200397,0.006922358,0.1835783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084528635,0.00021060693,0.111578435,0.00035528952,0.00024198699,0.00012760476,0.100744255,0.0015262077,0.005358304,0.105455376,0.6718737,0.001682957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033058736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034153845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6649513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015890964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017081333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988242259","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2006.35.3.197","title":"Occupiers' Liability in England and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Liability; Legislature; Law; Tort; Position (finance); Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.021784751265324344,"score_gpt":0.3100154524167192,"score_spread":0.2882307011513948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988242259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14980672,0.36767134,0.000001328372,0.061982203,0.00040043413,0.0008886313,0.000010885247,0.000051543822,0.4191869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982519,0.0137471035,0.000028907925,0.0018689447,0.000086016094,0.000011848343,0.0000025634702,0.0000033060405,0.0017323114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990293,0.00022511759,0.00021659474,0.00015098574,0.00017968977,0.00019833537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999461,0.00023705751,0.000042433312,0.00016144756,0.000024987605,0.00007305186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083276373,0.00007230322,0.00023224729,0.000011693414,0.00018782036,0.000031044066,0.00014491589,0.000018118371,0.0001424278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006506651,0.00006320734,0.000025407184,0.00020242904,0.00019083271,0.00009654077,0.000034478795,0.000105051324,0.000004567125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008722341,0.00006089398,0.27370748,0.0021580863,0.0000036056801,0.000052656538,0.00033307527,0.0000013137037,0.0000017003174,0.6358126,0.060462017,0.027397849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053111624,0.0000028462641,0.013854634,0.0009246768,0.00001054633,4.9870323e-7,0.000011890091,6.2661536e-7,0.0000018039602,0.0024689897,0.9825898,0.00008061516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011707558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015202172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25775206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988893329","doi":"10.7202/042941ar","title":"La compétence des tribunaux administratifs en matière de Charte","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021645477171097487,"score_gpt":0.2976565219879077,"score_spread":0.2760110448168102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988893329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7887962,0.004961534,0.00474387,0.027075857,0.00032259666,0.000228622,0.000056363984,0.00011710069,0.17369787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87565553,0.0013971353,0.0069634104,0.0008275754,0.0009432291,0.000017856983,0.0000057808707,0.000020927846,0.11416855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758625,0.0005617189,0.00030654197,0.0003246302,0.0003567173,0.00086415844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984423,0.00075298315,0.00010728153,0.0002227361,0.00007050565,0.00040422613],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014269749,0.0002224236,0.00027572832,0.000045073364,0.00072006235,0.00020634213,0.0005494197,0.0005335069,0.0012403304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039560808,0.0002627228,0.00016650834,0.0003154185,0.0029048591,0.0004947145,0.00003685809,0.00066852884,0.0005663548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050313567,0.00017355307,0.0018570378,0.00022398222,0.00004481419,0.00018489563,0.1093314,0.00006501955,0.00044608736,0.52468026,0.0067345356,0.3562081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027042892,0.00014732413,0.0076935627,0.00037816988,0.0001391706,0.00018994445,0.017046088,0.0007442632,0.0008063803,0.047079943,0.9250548,0.0004499207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032996773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008640275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91832024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021950349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039987252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988982783","doi":"10.7202/042498ar","title":"« La Loi canadienne sur les droits de la personne » : une Charte méconnue","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Redress; Charter; Law; Legislation; Fundamental rights; Commission; Statute","score_opus":0.012542228335321868,"score_gpt":0.2580288492947892,"score_spread":0.24548662095946733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988982783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92582643,0.00036630267,0.00025242943,0.0066816653,0.00007150742,0.000095179515,0.000012889695,0.00009312637,0.06660049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803092,0.00023210699,0.00042273154,0.0005200582,0.0004208159,0.000013248943,0.0000036793833,0.000020605663,0.018057572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832094,0.00030170978,0.00015573173,0.00026389255,0.00021164851,0.0007460788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987385,0.0005687489,0.00006533193,0.00017074423,0.00005965926,0.00039697142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014516161,0.00014342133,0.00018538698,0.00007062764,0.00071009924,0.00013046201,0.00036487202,0.00033890666,0.00023352163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054745993,0.00016406455,0.000103599494,0.00025205745,0.0010548581,0.00022813508,0.000021008651,0.00044722512,0.00005748259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040500527,0.00007527177,0.005107665,0.000051407216,0.000041272015,0.00027553012,0.14218046,0.00007783217,0.0011184554,0.7222825,0.003917499,0.12483158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035132916,0.000045931673,0.013770715,0.000097795535,0.00006931925,0.00008132639,0.031795193,0.00022970747,0.000291576,0.0112541905,0.9415981,0.00041477793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17168306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42829305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93768066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012924625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030403453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83383274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989843759","doi":"10.7202/042908ar","title":"L'arrêt Morgentaler et l'article 7 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de l'Abitibi Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Section (typography); Charter; Confusion; Humanities; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.013575874446780382,"score_gpt":0.2944263822160566,"score_spread":0.2808505077692762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989843759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378021,0.00018868581,0.00059900625,0.006182692,0.000062599334,0.00009793515,0.0000075565245,0.00009538367,0.05496407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825472,0.0001982987,0.0012982135,0.0028683997,0.00015960893,0.000016238158,0.0000029679625,0.000019758127,0.0128892865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984327,0.00029749703,0.00014855112,0.00021754307,0.00019677888,0.0007069069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905777,0.00027126915,0.000045094872,0.00015751767,0.00003771175,0.00043063916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001450902,0.000116598116,0.00013173393,0.000049573948,0.0005124881,0.0001362541,0.00026795734,0.00018406869,0.0003741129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033164385,0.00013132904,0.00008007844,0.0002002383,0.00082034466,0.0003862885,0.000026200592,0.00031340375,0.00010489882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041875926,0.00012270252,0.015110079,0.000028346987,0.00003618193,0.000107451306,0.18585683,0.00020924618,0.0063684266,0.75074375,0.004890858,0.03648423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006747809,0.00010065578,0.10949813,0.00012677394,0.00010122416,0.00010091115,0.015825203,0.0005520655,0.0055987695,0.10319716,0.7634924,0.00073193625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03848164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1924124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75860155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011062885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020275764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989924674","doi":"10.7202/043799ar","title":"Les agents de sécurité privée doivent-ils respecter les droits conférés par la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026359456369177265,"score_gpt":0.2985724691073548,"score_spread":0.27221301273817755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989924674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338383,0.0049750274,0.0007161551,0.01463444,0.0004615296,0.00042072122,0.00011410621,0.00015185082,0.044687875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9063552,0.0028149409,0.0015399844,0.0016134182,0.0008003582,0.000051628173,0.000022881402,0.00008098248,0.08672058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457777,0.0009955186,0.00063117896,0.00082081207,0.00057755824,0.0023971708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708194,0.0007303421,0.00029089802,0.00047049165,0.00018599069,0.0012403206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022416343,0.0005460591,0.0005930463,0.00017684011,0.0016241416,0.00041063162,0.00092754595,0.00094398484,0.0012966219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005718842,0.00064966246,0.00034704537,0.0005451643,0.0034566892,0.00081859727,0.00011754165,0.0011861654,0.00025424614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012612989,0.00028564048,0.009676932,0.00026785184,0.00018994283,0.00059831387,0.105396,0.00012032089,0.0008639194,0.74052316,0.005442987,0.13650878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073273404,0.0002099293,0.03483683,0.0008835893,0.00031410097,0.00021225057,0.0055043846,0.00029023376,0.0015415547,0.04428603,0.91017795,0.0010103865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099643566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30874857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90473497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002631191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053853693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991217914","doi":"10.7202/042309ar","title":"Uniformité et efficacité des garanties en matière de libertés publiques","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Legislature; Parliament; Civil liberties; Government (linguistics); Officer; Public administration; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.015508466007953163,"score_gpt":0.29170993226630554,"score_spread":0.2762014662583524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991217914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81641394,0.0004285306,0.002111288,0.012598015,0.000054194003,0.00012770035,0.0000047772787,0.00021625448,0.16804533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94649184,0.0006751438,0.0065056407,0.001838413,0.00033216827,0.000014423603,0.000004179525,0.000017742535,0.044120476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986717,0.00021565447,0.00016314076,0.00017453879,0.00026714607,0.00050782965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.00034690378,0.00004736942,0.00014610744,0.00006499808,0.00017355445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010817164,0.00011892162,0.00014961125,0.000069964546,0.0005130848,0.00021222541,0.00036913008,0.00023433373,0.00027002668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050347165,0.00012176249,0.000093770985,0.00017721394,0.0006979282,0.0005816741,0.000028749002,0.0003038507,0.00008796347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004428011,0.00006055643,0.0035756824,0.000053748987,0.000028553332,0.000022887321,0.1297171,0.00007265777,0.00029926794,0.7582907,0.0054986305,0.102335945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020697039,0.000059490634,0.010569869,0.000112524416,0.00004572663,0.000024854897,0.014397793,0.00013162185,0.001615655,0.08220769,0.8902717,0.00035608833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038715922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011202985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007854787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018033982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6251529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991254034","doi":"10.7202/042224ar","title":"Les abus de pouvoir et de fonction en droit pénal canadien","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013405646616204765,"score_gpt":0.29709917492226173,"score_spread":0.283693528306057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991254034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92193085,0.0001405014,0.0046396335,0.0049598864,0.00010819826,0.00010591931,0.00000776068,0.00009886229,0.06800839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98553437,0.00013700867,0.0021228432,0.0012632255,0.00058031315,0.000015459647,0.0000048298216,0.000015974249,0.010325988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851596,0.00021169598,0.00015240927,0.00021900963,0.00026257584,0.0006383169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999189,0.00025639383,0.00006058239,0.00013888744,0.00004349559,0.00031160965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169455,0.00011280373,0.00013415838,0.00006923796,0.0006024619,0.00009836482,0.0003053319,0.0002717462,0.00020219463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036755324,0.00013477348,0.000091427726,0.00015640668,0.00031769375,0.000249255,0.00001791621,0.00038152115,0.00004600791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067247,0.000073445844,0.020738952,0.000037425874,0.000047902548,0.00012416294,0.12096577,0.00093447877,0.0011078113,0.73568684,0.00612586,0.114076704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094754,0.00014723679,0.07559698,0.00010939594,0.00014707184,0.00014487686,0.026641704,0.00082598906,0.0010621998,0.055188548,0.8389329,0.0006936406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16326731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39434093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047060633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005219622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991470258","doi":"10.7202/1000616ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis: Art. 1053 C.C. Revolutionized","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02704984100598097,"score_gpt":0.31607487544745744,"score_spread":0.2890250344414765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991470258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03285337,0.00025484466,0.0001401902,0.012836886,0.003308247,0.0001379537,0.0000123004465,0.00011091017,0.9503453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933591,0.00026343443,0.0014044163,0.00033081273,0.0011486462,0.000004164892,0.0000011240006,0.00001237681,0.00347592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998398,0.00016240448,0.00027893414,0.00016959339,0.00054547883,0.00044557542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998977,0.00011349931,0.00014270551,0.00017676015,0.00023553056,0.0003544834],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013532891,0.00010950541,0.00016590426,0.000040229766,0.007190615,0.00018085178,0.00038724145,0.0001148631,0.0020708789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032912596,0.00009724583,0.00014537583,0.00015511704,0.00038771567,0.0005198385,0.000039329116,0.0006660661,0.00067398197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045104433,0.00007380591,0.0003980559,0.000009855449,0.000023094259,0.00008060934,0.0006717313,0.000007424139,0.0010030272,0.9626458,0.023528218,0.011513255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002121647,0.00002513314,0.00046874752,0.000034072436,0.000027442627,0.00009562838,0.0006132408,0.0000098606215,0.00017754977,0.0036290751,0.99456495,0.00014212534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032978507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08706113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97103673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009164997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041427455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991906732","doi":"10.7202/043536ar","title":"Une réflexion sur l'unification de certains recours extraordinaires","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024626958968824053,"score_gpt":0.2913163589910314,"score_spread":0.26668940002220737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991906732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8223709,0.004959052,0.006662941,0.13785635,0.00057375454,0.00020386209,0.000012496435,0.00011480056,0.027245838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90992385,0.0025956035,0.002160547,0.0009849571,0.0009877023,0.000016973372,0.000010232924,0.000025468173,0.08329466],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978926,0.00028873095,0.00030230926,0.00036610293,0.00035320016,0.0007970415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988079,0.00032229675,0.00015762847,0.00027670024,0.000100176396,0.00033527365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010595825,0.00019807692,0.00021478457,0.00007519643,0.00071168214,0.00012723153,0.00041657087,0.0005006317,0.00038831038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033762396,0.00024566977,0.00016751667,0.00053169084,0.0011527885,0.0005567013,0.000019190422,0.00048467072,0.0002942196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006185831,0.00014812063,0.0019817573,0.00008606501,0.000028767055,0.000031071842,0.036115896,0.0006928759,0.0008805868,0.37143224,0.014780382,0.5737604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002993417,0.00013983171,0.025011042,0.0002990538,0.00019989697,0.0000471767,0.011224116,0.002721474,0.0010949182,0.076790914,0.8815919,0.0005803041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039701574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031842154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8668116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034959333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004309553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992039950","doi":"10.7202/017296ar","title":"L’enjeu des années 1990 : la police, les tribunaux et les municipalités","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victimisation; SAFER; Declaration; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.554087134116249,"score_gpt":0.48311021026143636,"score_spread":0.07097692385481263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992039950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8335655,0.002006967,0.00005951534,0.010368732,0.000105910076,0.00012058921,0.000007934472,0.00030900806,0.15345588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928348,0.0018242816,0.0012937678,0.00047118537,0.00030544234,0.000020573658,0.0000048874517,0.0000141408555,0.0032309026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980271,0.0005129055,0.0002403979,0.00030165105,0.00028482694,0.0006331542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984426,0.00090599444,0.00007124018,0.0003095177,0.00012157445,0.00014909501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011017197,0.00017695417,0.00022020371,0.00008938709,0.0011599777,0.00021061455,0.0006523457,0.000281865,0.00021009067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011769284,0.00015837821,0.0001179506,0.00017341357,0.001901276,0.0006546566,0.00015295905,0.00030315333,0.00017188732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029397126,0.00013066242,0.0052545,0.00004116794,0.000018205512,0.000013822575,0.028433308,0.00003210383,0.00024590752,0.5179284,0.0050294297,0.44284308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018492341,0.00007813782,0.023676636,0.00006657164,0.00005846782,0.00000766171,0.040392697,0.000009782459,0.0011558189,0.008395669,0.9256721,0.00030151778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048934076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04201971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010648304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020302126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97546095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992178576","doi":"10.7202/042616ar","title":"Les articles 8, 9 et 10 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Political science; Warrant; Charter; Search and seizure; Imprisonment; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.020471757379708282,"score_gpt":0.3039930866126004,"score_spread":0.2835213292328921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992178576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9184081,0.00026638547,0.000625264,0.0069393697,0.00003606739,0.00007927126,0.0000072560306,0.0001026806,0.073535636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785918,0.00023637552,0.0015590743,0.0014196949,0.00015947543,0.000014368979,0.0000027957099,0.000018059733,0.017998373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984365,0.00034564015,0.00015055556,0.00021258049,0.000189844,0.00066485145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989149,0.0004801332,0.000050987765,0.00014852652,0.000051118397,0.00035434306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016178107,0.00012009051,0.00014047965,0.000059995025,0.0006035378,0.00016772165,0.0002810869,0.00020747223,0.00045012988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006007733,0.0001316961,0.00007815946,0.00018933708,0.000962622,0.0003292445,0.000024084507,0.00030521234,0.000078952224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003572771,0.00006511458,0.0038736365,0.000024533943,0.000023772753,0.000060872644,0.125667,0.00011624589,0.0014877128,0.7398658,0.0029333173,0.12584625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003458274,0.00008369796,0.039719377,0.00011897576,0.00006959297,0.00004740678,0.012261982,0.00025540436,0.001877765,0.12519306,0.81954825,0.00047863775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07509808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34650952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.816615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093851524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019054164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9310609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994123105","doi":"10.7202/017385ar","title":"Les décisions pénales dans les causes d’homicide au tribunal de Montréal, de 1985 à 1989","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Tribunal; Sentence; Criminology; Prison; Law; Political science; Charge (physics); Psychology; History; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Philosophy; Physics; Medical emergency; Linguistics","score_opus":0.39805796921806147,"score_gpt":0.43167488392183995,"score_spread":0.03361691470377848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994123105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627847,0.002447933,0.001667198,0.014388308,0.00014979196,0.0001444604,0.0000151100785,0.0002780351,0.018124474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207383,0.0019280554,0.003201783,0.00033062033,0.00057859777,0.00002618375,0.0000048471015,0.000016451237,0.0018396381],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978439,0.00026245258,0.00029520303,0.00034015614,0.0003100091,0.00094827916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984793,0.0007745458,0.00009354919,0.00030102578,0.00009333671,0.00025820895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007068691,0.00019971062,0.0002448561,0.00009299938,0.0015250264,0.00011627861,0.000673058,0.00025750042,0.0002552596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017735353,0.0001816818,0.00015317756,0.00014271407,0.0008116553,0.00026585767,0.00012541054,0.00028999505,0.00017844718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016657492,0.00040617096,0.17887717,0.00005257176,0.00006327381,0.00023442238,0.06414053,0.0011197114,0.011247856,0.09909065,0.03215239,0.6124487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003707309,0.00014985797,0.25411665,0.000119915516,0.00022828368,0.000046593104,0.053294804,0.00016350033,0.012650686,0.006389702,0.67187285,0.00059641217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1369613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21880916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6397205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010506121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075521995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994914693","doi":"10.7202/043037ar","title":"L'élargissement du concept de « détention », premier jalon d'une véritable protection contre l'auto-incrimination?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013695211145672783,"score_gpt":0.26640633489518234,"score_spread":0.25271112374950955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994914693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77247727,0.006121296,0.08668432,0.09578914,0.0014764265,0.0015289569,0.000031951353,0.00025790982,0.03563274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634838,0.0005911346,0.0017190797,0.0007354799,0.00123553,0.000108588414,0.000020272975,0.000028646204,0.13207747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972297,0.00042483382,0.00043709963,0.00046739067,0.00056054164,0.00088044873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885666,0.0001383332,0.00024403316,0.00023520777,0.00021973287,0.00030600734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013484498,0.0002637645,0.00028933457,0.00009169067,0.0011258343,0.00020948141,0.00030764876,0.0005597711,0.0008836624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032781114,0.00032299838,0.00020672206,0.00045182704,0.00089049904,0.0008679981,0.00003702919,0.00055790023,0.00022097923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001932258,0.00074701576,0.001608412,0.00035908807,0.00016102272,0.000073800846,0.10209914,0.0022769794,0.008214844,0.40835884,0.023435874,0.45247176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001015056,0.0002713001,0.005259949,0.00042418984,0.00038560663,0.000056492525,0.01836415,0.008725868,0.0070954347,0.0182036,0.93958044,0.0006178925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022188853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00693683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9161446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047888015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023342732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996793311","doi":"10.7202/043888ar","title":"La notion d’expertise du décideur administratif aux fins de l’application de la méthode pragmatique et fonctionnelle","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02119113621968625,"score_gpt":0.32270194741927943,"score_spread":0.30151081119959317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996793311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49056062,0.00098467,0.4281117,0.03795252,0.0001627393,0.00028368292,0.000017968385,0.00012770151,0.04179838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96732,0.0016936014,0.017739138,0.0018903861,0.0007097623,0.0001128756,0.000015281299,0.000029354445,0.010489565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971789,0.0013215716,0.0003232762,0.00035362778,0.00027803562,0.0005445617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823964,0.00096859166,0.00017662878,0.00023518824,0.0000786667,0.00030128966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025834634,0.00020456481,0.00019809173,0.000055623983,0.0006643923,0.0001992643,0.00030268487,0.0007394764,0.00018611105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078409846,0.00025316604,0.0001448868,0.00027085017,0.0009885513,0.0005035004,0.000028881472,0.00065672275,0.00012019888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052305626,0.00025871058,0.00132445,0.00008584854,0.000022675335,0.000038751776,0.056488317,0.0016203533,0.0019028346,0.80646175,0.004791842,0.12695213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005165821,0.00016206353,0.013652725,0.00026599588,0.00017761698,0.00035410438,0.012470953,0.025329659,0.0026528654,0.095945515,0.8478658,0.0006060856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006051966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010776713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.843074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002254981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088718877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996793615","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.2.121","title":"Showing Remorse: Reflections on the Gap between Expression and Attribution in Cases of Wrongful Conviction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Conviction; Criminal Conviction; Psychology; Disposition; Criminal justice; Attribution; Expression (computer science); Criminology; Inclusion (mineral); Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2878678158405966,"score_gpt":0.3872231436201995,"score_spread":0.09935532777960288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996793615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98341626,0.0009956425,0.0012394523,0.012059828,0.00040505308,0.0001814674,0.000022658716,0.000013286646,0.0016663467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997101,0.0009874641,0.00082853687,0.0006789776,0.00032561505,0.00000984602,0.0000043692694,0.000017028891,0.00004714039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971717,0.0007497573,0.00061121455,0.0003226837,0.00013948235,0.001005172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958176,0.0023523944,0.0003960543,0.00022981333,0.00040024353,0.0008039093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025886593,0.00024303868,0.00045207574,0.00056585076,0.00089785934,0.0000841317,0.00039896718,0.00043313115,0.000041327734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076029813,0.0002240924,0.00008693493,0.00021044655,0.0013577018,0.00035328182,0.00003761138,0.0010169124,0.000002086947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049797667,0.00011418096,0.007707837,0.0016230913,0.000095000214,0.0041137934,0.15586159,0.001621993,0.006304984,0.81216097,0.00064695784,0.009251618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017383242,0.0022623993,0.14199312,0.002864287,0.007902654,0.0070568593,0.7843532,0.000037867303,0.004219707,0.03442221,0.012263474,0.0008858774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067559145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27070606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77773875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011160601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029305925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9386501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997095232","doi":"10.7202/042410ar","title":"Le recours en cassation dans le contentieux municipal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Offensive; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02101771330191722,"score_gpt":0.28367808232866965,"score_spread":0.26266036902675244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997095232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88333476,0.00011971389,0.0020939282,0.00933919,0.00013848423,0.00009759958,0.0000033032597,0.00006992894,0.10480311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770342,0.000083718165,0.00066319265,0.0003277212,0.00027624547,0.000009230924,0.000004971818,0.0000089452005,0.02159179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907947,0.00014690807,0.00012506745,0.00014943427,0.00020397783,0.00029514704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953496,0.00012899494,0.00005095962,0.00013408964,0.00003907698,0.0001119325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007233583,0.00006669141,0.00009866454,0.00003495559,0.00067002355,0.00006374268,0.0002451941,0.00015718579,0.000045126162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022988184,0.00008029901,0.00006685733,0.000106864645,0.00039109166,0.0002829215,0.000015476728,0.00019374667,0.000045333723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028093575,0.00006516937,0.0021448904,0.000010174818,0.000020384783,0.000017849685,0.11941531,0.00017143697,0.0020903319,0.83362466,0.0031266408,0.03928508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053304486,0.000062732164,0.016685657,0.000049633756,0.00005731187,0.000014898789,0.16706811,0.000561178,0.0017005206,0.01985423,0.7930077,0.00040501644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041747704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08491618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8137704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053836644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001983893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9646334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997241629","doi":"10.7202/043913ar","title":"La refonte du régime québécois d’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels : les révélations du droit français","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.018878539718168635,"score_gpt":0.2597696980384871,"score_spread":0.24089115832031846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997241629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8961351,0.006768479,0.0128044905,0.023065886,0.000429615,0.0003005787,0.000047733876,0.0002374192,0.060210727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695458,0.0029724457,0.0034613898,0.00073554146,0.0016299783,0.000042810694,0.000020987034,0.0000578703,0.021533184],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968053,0.00052116124,0.00059367274,0.0005793785,0.00060402334,0.00089647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973587,0.001311907,0.00026850388,0.00036389686,0.00028796887,0.0004090562],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013253129,0.00039872935,0.0004338373,0.00018139268,0.0022277657,0.00034136968,0.0005896279,0.000855962,0.0013750808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010763487,0.00047127705,0.0003441781,0.0005793926,0.0033458194,0.0014839898,0.00006646386,0.00076175586,0.0004937178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006204426,0.00023368288,0.023574518,0.00014853831,0.00013019925,0.000055740195,0.28420788,0.00084798987,0.00030108044,0.30863786,0.003122608,0.37867787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000511513,0.00014826887,0.076786034,0.00040370063,0.0005586853,0.00011778194,0.03566052,0.0021211724,0.00063859095,0.051501427,0.83066,0.0008922963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13371101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16787916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022150357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003792295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000590209","doi":"10.7202/043973ar","title":"Gestion d’instance, proportionnalité et preuve civile : état provisoire des questions","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.018963876523958235,"score_gpt":0.29195471022201464,"score_spread":0.2729908336980564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000590209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93283594,0.0023291232,0.0048588556,0.024765579,0.0015846653,0.0005261845,0.00004633174,0.00019655867,0.03285678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927976,0.00096170075,0.0038207015,0.00043757033,0.0005360878,0.000052524585,0.0000163615,0.00002864613,0.06617042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776775,0.0003384943,0.00034480903,0.0004233339,0.00044567173,0.00067996874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867797,0.00024294449,0.00019178365,0.00030361448,0.0002343386,0.00034934096],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014027284,0.00022622864,0.00022429886,0.000072270166,0.0012891982,0.00020623177,0.00033499612,0.0006494711,0.0004813023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001084639,0.0002545462,0.00015411744,0.00048299186,0.0036198325,0.000867494,0.00003484416,0.0012893906,0.00015627976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027181357,0.0001791498,0.0043233973,0.0002024874,0.000022863387,0.000041392836,0.026937898,0.0000679686,0.0013846612,0.87099993,0.002079393,0.09373369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028541515,0.00023381034,0.041224096,0.00093672,0.00025129598,0.000113856404,0.0072454475,0.00043832345,0.00054809713,0.37112427,0.5768978,0.0007009022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008480148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052883945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5748184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009560351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005236252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000798285","doi":"10.7202/1027455ar","title":"Responsabilité, justice et procédure pénale comparée","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03844232178104873,"score_gpt":0.3174339752331102,"score_spread":0.27899165345206145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000798285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6685514,0.0038370932,0.0014993727,0.108922124,0.0023410607,0.0005444959,0.000038475864,0.00017417624,0.21409184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92063606,0.0006627113,0.0018861892,0.0016398506,0.0020063305,0.000031429383,0.000008695103,0.000034010554,0.073094726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966538,0.0010387845,0.00043881143,0.0005590168,0.00041268748,0.0008969169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733675,0.0013347561,0.00018986475,0.0005311137,0.00017108556,0.00043641432],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030294806,0.00020317921,0.00043486405,0.0000629149,0.0005224266,0.00016054646,0.00063985394,0.0003117089,0.00075713615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018654951,0.00031417146,0.00022384305,0.0005462328,0.00075520354,0.0004760426,0.00010184829,0.00052600994,0.0016730974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013532268,0.0002736945,0.003720317,0.0016628936,0.00002783358,0.0000521168,0.015602462,0.00044033772,0.00027647975,0.941126,0.023348253,0.0133343125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031692162,0.00025889443,0.009003473,0.0010451507,0.00044031805,0.00011409765,0.0030573532,0.0030233208,0.00012984974,0.08501661,0.8970206,0.0005734399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001584578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028069285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8736723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043308217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003045841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003043951","doi":"10.7202/1013033ar","title":"L’abus de droit : l’anténorme — Partie 1","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06907063178431219,"score_gpt":0.33019011628675987,"score_spread":0.2611194845024477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003043951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04683813,0.018246055,0.00022336775,0.026922278,0.008664052,0.00012733736,0.000034462344,0.00005406445,0.89889026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831932,0.002437899,0.0005947886,0.0010304217,0.0044796467,0.0000037194213,6.6607623e-7,0.000024894103,0.0082347365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966234,0.00041877246,0.00044081654,0.00017336094,0.0006438285,0.0016998302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801236,0.00020507538,0.0002364279,0.00017837336,0.0001344048,0.0012333696],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027762032,0.00020717102,0.0002736647,0.000037175414,0.005759682,0.00016146222,0.0004376131,0.0002302849,0.004753867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001688329,0.00021453957,0.00026270445,0.0002498609,0.0007078165,0.0016568613,0.000071961425,0.00070572546,0.0014811653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026778873,0.00021340087,0.002159549,0.000029170491,0.00004325471,0.000088691755,0.0018916632,0.000016991558,0.00005129976,0.9605299,0.00741059,0.027538694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018415271,0.00009432002,0.0010493153,0.00017902482,0.00014807771,0.00095589814,0.0016414765,0.000025308822,0.00034962,0.0143839065,0.98070073,0.00028817108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005436417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01162674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97329015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071135577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047479167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003393265","doi":"10.7202/042696ar","title":"L'effectivité des jugements en droit administratif canadien et québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Enforcement; Tort; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Property (philosophy); Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01425839074361596,"score_gpt":0.2929743795174464,"score_spread":0.27871598877383047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003393265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9140403,0.00015060182,0.000832503,0.0026044147,0.000101583326,0.00019515146,0.000010997202,0.00008809999,0.08197631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851725,0.00011628113,0.0014733856,0.0008712073,0.00025154505,0.000029898685,0.0000046444643,0.00001613873,0.012064399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984638,0.00021796605,0.00016402242,0.00026525347,0.00032095876,0.00056799426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.00032944747,0.000060925493,0.00018443831,0.000044268345,0.00031200523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009930207,0.00013323453,0.00016347796,0.000061311635,0.00061422406,0.000114075076,0.00034432588,0.0001801583,0.00020328896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044920132,0.00015417003,0.00008862907,0.00018897258,0.0005474124,0.00034550758,0.000024267762,0.0002787063,0.00008796092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060621,0.0001374017,0.0243165,0.00006914197,0.00007355095,0.00013754744,0.13254967,0.00006629538,0.0004014161,0.64926904,0.0032896048,0.18962917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006562221,0.00039087085,0.08272717,0.0001882297,0.00017363066,0.00005454624,0.028832803,0.00012161276,0.0015016403,0.066515006,0.81786245,0.0009758143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25328523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87001973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8145729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021678563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045222565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75168717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003467181","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0033","title":"The Transformation of Canadian Property Rights?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02176375831598557,"score_gpt":0.252186807063797,"score_spread":0.23042304874781142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003467181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45226392,0.02591953,0.000059370275,0.18108934,0.0049976693,0.00066563435,0.0004470456,0.000009828241,0.33454767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98101145,0.0023234836,0.00013248724,0.0013663403,0.0007809307,0.000003970512,0.0000090855065,0.000021827107,0.014350423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973008,0.00024879,0.0008529402,0.00020465648,0.00020864361,0.0011841926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963267,0.00029449438,0.0004626307,0.00020167454,0.00066327717,0.0020512103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023775233,0.00024722167,0.00047208855,0.00013464964,0.0025396892,0.00024232615,0.00051873934,0.00035657408,0.00016017223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008282845,0.00019255633,0.00049352186,0.0005972476,0.0024085592,0.0007932452,0.0000078205685,0.0006062,0.0000045300535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055350065,0.000009496148,0.000081223494,0.000119004006,0.00008247883,0.00006164614,0.050769426,0.00003901095,0.000011016126,0.9291822,0.015341976,0.004297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030027548,0.00012865826,0.0005160088,0.0003681912,0.00018165052,0.00017602988,0.021819545,0.000086257016,0.000023193614,0.03972145,0.93641514,0.0002636158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92107314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017547946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004836322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003472309","doi":"10.7202/017271ar","title":"L’alcool au volant, c’est criminel depuis 1921 !","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Legislation; Publicity; Criminal code; Law enforcement; Drunk drivers; Parliament; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Criminal law; Enforcement; Drunk driving; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Politics; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.4824835799520262,"score_gpt":0.4458425143745009,"score_spread":0.03664106557752528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003472309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837906,0.0007633075,0.000286976,0.021292344,0.0009161731,0.00025681002,0.0000061723235,0.00048406515,0.19220355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913972,0.00034053088,0.0010387884,0.0010459666,0.0014323966,0.000025432491,0.000005313155,0.000016453363,0.004697889],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978568,0.0001247776,0.0002827345,0.00041485517,0.00039752666,0.00092331023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881357,0.00031551573,0.00008659979,0.00040357883,0.0001274423,0.0002533205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005215752,0.00019843716,0.00023521988,0.000094056464,0.00079511973,0.000120157114,0.00072047266,0.00021691495,0.00078702456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012349216,0.0001842384,0.00012822308,0.00017175524,0.000641648,0.00044874955,0.0001371627,0.00024225499,0.0023537877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086299064,0.00029364857,0.013241508,0.00006825888,0.00003608437,0.00012046476,0.022069085,0.000047769066,0.0013829949,0.10089175,0.05771912,0.804043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024081215,0.00009018103,0.022359347,0.00004021799,0.00009600365,0.000012711103,0.009993616,0.00004348658,0.002240763,0.00195482,0.9624987,0.0004292989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076179504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009547626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9047796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035659748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045378282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003784538","doi":"10.7202/1000627ar","title":"Les rapports entre le droit administratif et les droits et libertés : la révision judiciaire ou le contrôle constitutionnel ?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0862416366487741,"score_gpt":0.32793883425570025,"score_spread":0.24169719760692615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003784538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015511154,0.0050151385,0.0007949555,0.043311782,0.0019045159,0.00027300938,0.000120212724,0.00009070788,0.9329785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893251,0.002054237,0.00077137793,0.0006577571,0.00032892072,0.000007127219,0.0000091634265,0.000031729607,0.0068145683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615204,0.0011544531,0.0007780526,0.00045172242,0.0007212386,0.000742479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788094,0.0003944192,0.000531955,0.00024315917,0.0003338918,0.00061562797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026645272,0.00036357433,0.00048835255,0.0000732226,0.006676908,0.0002931804,0.0005084594,0.0004536321,0.0015683195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024324661,0.0003693178,0.00035319306,0.00022950144,0.0020590173,0.0015644201,0.00011564816,0.001035318,0.0001139732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009199808,0.00054349983,0.0003797442,0.000039412353,0.00006806761,0.0007759803,0.002676617,0.000015271382,0.00003942239,0.96840215,0.0035756656,0.023392178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000871102,0.0002464072,0.0011884192,0.00093662966,0.00014696794,0.0012796323,0.008446843,0.000028169537,0.0006438411,0.045606803,0.9401079,0.00049729756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0810115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15231553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97381395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014095212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005856258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003991614","doi":"10.7202/038893ar","title":"The Confessions Rule and the Charter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Silence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Charter; Bill of rights; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02090596218630384,"score_gpt":0.31377633744655514,"score_spread":0.2928703752602513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003991614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05315149,0.00026253742,0.000009312928,0.14811905,0.0022084916,0.00013614795,0.0000046138066,0.00002162214,0.7960867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974494,0.00032665377,0.000037014273,0.00060480845,0.00047648308,0.0000030362535,5.676936e-8,0.0000032171865,0.00109934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.00016028872,0.00011045389,0.000059451802,0.00022518211,0.00020395835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992163,0.00043731334,0.00005951363,0.00009780523,0.00007271939,0.000116324496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017706556,0.000045612687,0.00006213779,0.0000056860313,0.016506804,0.00025084367,0.000248495,0.000038521128,0.0002283639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002023239,0.000019871657,0.000047253867,0.000034168475,0.0011468816,0.00015472913,0.00003690039,0.00041915767,0.00003595541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015373083,0.000004236443,0.000055540935,4.111222e-7,0.0000042930596,0.0000030276212,0.0007764714,4.620565e-8,0.000062581035,0.9909265,0.0011345631,0.0070169624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019015433,0.000005973328,0.00040885631,0.0000077516015,0.000010982043,0.00005213168,0.0019016335,0.0000051821025,0.000036014688,0.017981693,0.97936285,0.00003676418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018504855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052525856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000076642655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011630454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004086633","doi":"10.7202/004710ar","title":"Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Victim-Oriented Legal Reform in Europe","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Political science; Duty; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Guideline; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.531214141632105,"score_gpt":0.44635642689767474,"score_spread":0.08485771473443027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004086633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678436,0.00094947004,0.000008192486,0.0006319865,0.0001415064,0.00045905382,0.0000013046403,0.000009654201,0.029955259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997805,0.00009508803,0.000025806869,0.000012587039,0.000010958479,0.000034444438,5.9557186e-7,0.0000028296395,0.000037187947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967952,0.0019517688,0.00018214245,0.00014948394,0.0007910497,0.00013038177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858826,0.00028380755,0.00010715034,0.00017569629,0.0008270358,0.000018025652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007915855,0.00006342945,0.00017450172,0.000050100996,0.00009679164,0.000009443032,0.00015848762,0.000057850662,0.00014069649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038677033,0.00004125662,0.000042739946,0.00032890515,0.0003397115,0.00019941776,0.000054461074,0.000074635136,0.0000035234948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000467207,0.0011025039,0.031526424,0.00074558106,0.00078103726,0.000006819181,0.03760534,0.0016711893,0.02310473,0.2941822,0.00025645195,0.6085505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016304686,0.00032932655,0.9224343,0.00014227728,0.008751823,0.0000033338622,0.011242825,0.0047072344,0.03682512,0.009593374,0.0040464844,0.0002934444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029284218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012084488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8909079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021548891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012504274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46302813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004471259","doi":"10.7202/043931ar","title":"La liberté d’expression au travail et l’obligation de loyauté du salarié : étude empirique de l’incidence des chartes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01310741831431206,"score_gpt":0.2798715204994822,"score_spread":0.26676410218517016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004471259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540609,0.0032750324,0.0136458995,0.018374344,0.00019193423,0.00020759348,0.000013792452,0.00013870475,0.010091787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764454,0.0042525027,0.0061556865,0.0023043365,0.0009212674,0.000039989645,0.000008715413,0.00004301096,0.009829136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965099,0.0010741566,0.0003920093,0.00047122763,0.0004794652,0.0010732341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978868,0.0010016912,0.00020545429,0.00027330976,0.00011188228,0.0005208913],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030913085,0.00030426835,0.00030279558,0.00009322796,0.000987868,0.00027773905,0.00058087514,0.00083387096,0.0002693581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094302313,0.00034786735,0.00020038678,0.00040501257,0.0022080322,0.0011421992,0.00006810048,0.0008657974,0.00013897395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013996575,0.000416715,0.06724218,0.00038727224,0.00006108118,0.00022476792,0.53205264,0.0015019012,0.024358023,0.13327143,0.008138919,0.23220508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011157043,0.0004646673,0.39618838,0.0038219183,0.0004440096,0.0005715837,0.034619387,0.0056811017,0.04707881,0.11585604,0.39218011,0.001978274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011920502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49743327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033884125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083869556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005113290","doi":"10.1080/14662043.2011.582736","title":"Judicial and political review as limited insurance: the functioning of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act in ‘hard’ cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth and Comparative Politics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Legislation; Political science; Bill of rights; Politics; Cabinet (room); Duty; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.185225982108789,"score_gpt":0.38345302507022894,"score_spread":0.19822704296143995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005113290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693086,0.00705129,0.0000027176336,0.0064020865,0.00011422756,0.00032256363,0.000015218257,0.000006610568,0.01677666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771124,0.0012183076,0.000020914915,0.00078621105,0.00008013691,0.0000041930016,7.581778e-7,0.0000021373864,0.00017610408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987225,0.00038288263,0.0003020317,0.00011338547,0.00019048808,0.00028869376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988053,0.000625622,0.00014389906,0.0001503406,0.000100418496,0.00017444925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003642014,0.00008963464,0.00029669347,0.000028817938,0.00034717072,0.000012161211,0.00016504797,0.00004166918,0.000025175283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024617257,0.000047628775,0.000038154933,0.00019781782,0.0008893618,0.00007937373,0.00005634624,0.00016006481,0.0000013480078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006158845,0.00006645953,0.1768026,0.00013928671,0.000013038869,0.000002225494,0.016339643,2.783752e-7,0.000003970662,0.8029466,0.0033386361,0.00028561664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043890346,0.00035501577,0.83714634,0.0016435891,0.00008973738,0.000023272307,0.0052858884,0.0000123936825,0.00034650273,0.11234062,0.04214419,0.00017351388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11252962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012856491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.690606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027443633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002839565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8933801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007511583","doi":"10.7202/1027454ar","title":"Le droit de la victime à des dommages punitifs en droit civil québécois : sens et contresens","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Freedom of expression; Philosophy; Human rights; Law","score_opus":0.013225375673420796,"score_gpt":0.2721219004016075,"score_spread":0.2588965247281867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007511583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6259584,0.002601272,0.0030342645,0.029409645,0.0005515032,0.00041065676,0.00009873566,0.0002487406,0.3376868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578811,0.0031529171,0.0012487301,0.00102314,0.0017494812,0.000040880997,0.000021838636,0.00008536378,0.034796547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944619,0.0022134066,0.0005821528,0.0007010792,0.0004862044,0.0015552455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470395,0.0034431985,0.00027338974,0.00064560043,0.00021502342,0.00071882125],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00400425,0.000359522,0.0007141303,0.00014733896,0.00091198395,0.0004302986,0.0008390034,0.000622823,0.00056855514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019284707,0.0005810103,0.00040134625,0.00057114515,0.002073029,0.0007652123,0.00019254723,0.00082039746,0.0006597938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006840559,0.00038802435,0.0070249382,0.00060908194,0.00013197356,0.00053199974,0.049928047,0.00034292068,0.0015526806,0.9120696,0.004676997,0.022675298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010443904,0.00030829775,0.0219374,0.0016079063,0.00046121964,0.000819091,0.016009308,0.0020752791,0.0008218054,0.5210657,0.43256503,0.0012845428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1793196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32055187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42788804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095611834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010366045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007721336","doi":"10.7202/042195ar","title":"Observations sur le Rapport de l'Office de révision du Code civil sur les sûretés réelles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Lien; Political science; Law; Security interest; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law","score_opus":0.05224272354398239,"score_gpt":0.27432068288192035,"score_spread":0.22207795933793795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007721336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636342,0.00048591325,0.0074203038,0.018612904,0.00009578628,0.00014787956,0.000014866562,0.00017182513,0.009416335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870315,0.0006594044,0.0024694027,0.00101931,0.00040319655,0.000018226634,0.000015756868,0.000023575612,0.008359581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982719,0.00020076554,0.00025741485,0.00028792056,0.00035727123,0.00062477007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986799,0.0005443831,0.000105454244,0.00022572848,0.00017704883,0.00026751417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014222169,0.00015210676,0.00019329228,0.00006437292,0.001191605,0.00013526427,0.00045392447,0.00029460195,0.00018126644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011442711,0.00017491274,0.00012574655,0.00032795276,0.0005015281,0.0004312685,0.000039863782,0.00033096856,0.000044320048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020566054,0.00066263886,0.15448081,0.00016489714,0.00010816321,0.0001746342,0.1303423,0.0023408837,0.0135184135,0.4706035,0.17262225,0.054775845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005055537,0.000057004057,0.06963086,0.00012584464,0.00009246967,0.000028231985,0.01619224,0.0026589583,0.002044887,0.007970714,0.9001325,0.00056078396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020654954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078132525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7275102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075865304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010144853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007912515","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106","title":"The Common Enterprise Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Principal (computer security); Common law; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Computer security; Data mining","score_opus":0.10403258259634907,"score_gpt":0.4238262595036901,"score_spread":0.319793676907341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007912515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45278996,0.0030233583,0.006900095,0.52998376,0.0037401984,0.00042378993,0.0000018363506,0.000016055044,0.0031209516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993754,0.0007050676,0.00009275081,0.0020359326,0.0018161315,0.0000044537883,1.338385e-7,0.0000058153455,0.001585679],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973178,0.00027522436,0.00047066982,0.00009646285,0.0015785057,0.00026133377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996593,0.0020265828,0.00035633158,0.00020611724,0.0007091268,0.00010885653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010348711,0.00008486416,0.00010221428,0.00005419117,0.0007958731,0.00037843094,0.0022950298,0.00003434565,0.00009074559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020744668,0.000035695575,0.00013989561,0.00017283778,0.0003079853,0.0005382005,0.00015656352,0.00031293815,0.00008087162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024464906,0.00018609325,0.015722191,0.000009188714,0.00020244687,0.00012490738,0.053517394,0.0005880776,0.0039283335,0.03692634,0.11551303,0.7708355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016254236,0.00023401456,0.029182281,0.0007217639,0.000054873635,0.00014821228,0.0078066885,0.000033404034,0.0021337902,0.019338455,0.9400357,0.00014824631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009740572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065382686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8245227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002507924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001895201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008860857","doi":"10.7202/1026749ar","title":"Une tentative de clarification de la présomption de respect des valeurs de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020481257215218613,"score_gpt":0.31216359368287483,"score_spread":0.29168233646765623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008860857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92214555,0.0009575604,0.05761911,0.004895965,0.00013963586,0.0002004829,0.000026089583,0.00009021875,0.013925385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97595334,0.001941217,0.008241755,0.000830975,0.0003128039,0.000050082224,0.000016679991,0.000043652508,0.01260948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451494,0.0032842716,0.00028829617,0.00042773515,0.00025397292,0.0012308047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703866,0.0017845177,0.00019137762,0.00024304735,0.00011255127,0.0006298205],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060909535,0.0002534998,0.0002634438,0.00011347941,0.0010222674,0.0002808297,0.00043765965,0.0006681124,0.00006521646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017665665,0.00030905457,0.00014577642,0.0005533691,0.0039994856,0.0005134209,0.000029321214,0.0008333571,0.00003798866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009559416,0.0001368496,0.022847835,0.00020173762,0.000068606576,0.000090233916,0.23328526,0.0006112261,0.010627687,0.66004556,0.0008900209,0.07109936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046035528,0.00023122398,0.26828873,0.0005149796,0.00031715713,0.00024958648,0.016526869,0.0028732584,0.0031986276,0.66080445,0.046006292,0.00052849087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18164748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12179797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2454409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005557019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006379818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009143937","doi":"10.7202/042770ar","title":"À la recherche d'une protection efficace contre les inspections abusives de l'État : la Charte québécoise, la Charte canadienne et le Bill of Rights américain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Warrant; Human rights; State (computer science); Business","score_opus":0.06026899105093407,"score_gpt":0.3168692097390976,"score_spread":0.2566002186881635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009143937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9087943,0.00021407923,0.003219407,0.028214999,0.000058316014,0.00039170546,0.000020694804,0.00014981683,0.05893669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919189,0.0003134312,0.0007641837,0.00014889785,0.00013884921,0.00006139436,0.0000034813158,0.00001787586,0.0066329837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974757,0.001393974,0.00022620629,0.00027408465,0.00018741736,0.0004426088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980463,0.0013026522,0.00014418802,0.00017995379,0.00010476949,0.00022218336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411817,0.00015146687,0.00022950917,0.00012170616,0.0006566324,0.000070489885,0.00024012633,0.0004962786,0.000030471687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000959105,0.00014102156,0.000113680726,0.0004652798,0.0009523019,0.00023927607,0.000015936752,0.00076184334,0.0000107886435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001510949,0.00034058196,0.00029819604,0.000070426984,0.00009878066,0.00006685382,0.20555997,0.0004209772,0.0072908495,0.68318504,0.0015695506,0.10094768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067515526,0.00011285276,0.00862776,0.00019967541,0.00008853464,0.00006608044,0.023964118,0.0002362172,0.0032417842,0.06339497,0.89897865,0.00041421124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60781974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8622344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010859342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047593456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57506925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009338544","doi":"10.7202/043068ar","title":"Les règles procédurales entourant la recevabilité des déclarations extrajudiciaires","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03750774742597392,"score_gpt":0.3149122592187984,"score_spread":0.2774045117928245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009338544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8907145,0.030810522,0.0021977266,0.028232789,0.0003316534,0.0003607356,0.000034757784,0.00016688312,0.047150422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93904966,0.0062748496,0.0056196055,0.0003638796,0.00096869364,0.000056642493,0.000007341742,0.000032714168,0.047626603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718374,0.0005724885,0.00045081595,0.00046286714,0.000480624,0.0008494389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980534,0.0009858588,0.00015480202,0.0002795222,0.00019260726,0.00033382795],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011326539,0.00029309606,0.00032149855,0.00009451501,0.0016546386,0.00025591315,0.00048949034,0.00058525434,0.00074952416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009736987,0.00032020066,0.00022917427,0.00055261474,0.0050560026,0.0007756846,0.000041101463,0.00063690386,0.00020526152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035857345,0.00020889562,0.0040676277,0.00019285337,0.000053795597,0.000034490724,0.050784167,0.00023707497,0.00064601103,0.4888253,0.0041607358,0.4507532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026466892,0.0001362397,0.022047738,0.000710505,0.00027018893,0.00008311714,0.020160822,0.00040469648,0.0010775477,0.089885086,0.86430573,0.00065364694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012654632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86014503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015640055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003090765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009451228","doi":"10.4000/champpenal.612","title":"Canadian Prisoners’ Right to a Fair and Impartial Disciplinary Proceedings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Champ pénal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Law; Charter; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Human rights; Minor (academic); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01862969392237048,"score_gpt":0.29822341926336776,"score_spread":0.2795937253409973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009451228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9262078,0.00006768438,0.000016884682,0.026036581,0.00014167553,0.00017311494,0.0000065918375,0.00003719692,0.047312465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954013,0.000004103896,0.0001422795,0.00018153885,0.0006840312,0.000014951168,0.0000019835875,0.0000059520194,0.003563819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905956,0.000011293959,0.000104421975,0.00020696005,0.00020543781,0.00041235154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994489,0.000018166254,0.000023445107,0.000047146674,0.000052028085,0.00041032815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026831805,0.00008032724,0.00009331363,0.00006759299,0.0006492917,0.00013088949,0.00013553267,0.00005913034,0.00015459552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033320153,0.00007344248,0.00002726587,0.0001766632,0.00013220772,0.00020607602,0.000041228104,0.000072927374,0.00006442671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016386819,0.00015275434,0.14136225,0.000091058275,0.000023579354,0.0001900644,0.16051705,0.000013048314,0.0056017283,0.26489833,0.42193812,0.0050481255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020867753,0.00014475739,0.068184175,0.000079086436,0.000015772544,0.000017532071,0.011979143,0.00004926017,0.0006587794,0.010724151,0.90750086,0.00043779216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40402123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72799003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48556274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016374761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024045316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59994745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009796871","doi":"10.7202/1027048ar","title":"L’arrêt Beaudry : la discrétion policière et la discrétion judiciaire balisées","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01637389420142863,"score_gpt":0.29977658088890274,"score_spread":0.2834026866874741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009796871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39716026,0.001994695,0.0020824315,0.090992905,0.0013898453,0.0003798256,0.00007716542,0.00020234013,0.50572056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730115,0.002125643,0.0003168741,0.00080091285,0.0020257274,0.000030734573,0.00004695453,0.00004485722,0.021596804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657714,0.0012957935,0.00043417048,0.0005062595,0.00042180408,0.0007648546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826205,0.00065425667,0.0002489839,0.00040580356,0.00008768579,0.0003412075],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022566626,0.00023732136,0.00040045852,0.00009298855,0.0005059058,0.00027472453,0.00046252625,0.0004566021,0.0002608057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050370424,0.0003337173,0.00029281786,0.0004735105,0.00075971964,0.00081514515,0.000115652256,0.00048336727,0.00038452382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024905068,0.0001539343,0.005596093,0.00030910192,0.000025900828,0.000033128075,0.0076014255,0.000113930735,0.00023866272,0.9122157,0.004783005,0.06890422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038321206,0.00018593282,0.06605301,0.0019190925,0.00030534185,0.00013246198,0.0031581367,0.0013849434,0.000110156696,0.27733898,0.6482662,0.0007625579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114919655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090067005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64348316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033051652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001576313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010562289","doi":"10.7202/042441ar","title":"Quelques mots sur la recevabilité des éléments de preuve extrinsèques devant les tribunaux : le Canada et les États-Unis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Statute; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legislature; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02155887224701705,"score_gpt":0.2879716732807354,"score_spread":0.2664128010337184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010562289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726975,0.0019532498,0.0008139804,0.003986848,0.000078353594,0.0002342076,0.000038063103,0.00013666372,0.020061137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98817915,0.0017150241,0.0025540756,0.00068331836,0.00015877488,0.000036527887,0.000009932455,0.000026881651,0.006636298],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997343,0.0007089235,0.00031663736,0.00037446202,0.0005164598,0.0007405103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998207,0.00091938686,0.00011766854,0.0002496206,0.00017638999,0.0003299678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016945647,0.00022148249,0.00027655973,0.0000612247,0.0014350463,0.00020671368,0.00049644033,0.00032236008,0.00008956036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001726278,0.0002350417,0.00011162362,0.00020792881,0.0011910042,0.0005362991,0.000057076588,0.00048065762,0.000005810187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002649041,0.00044781156,0.05906663,0.00031603413,0.00017988397,0.00022693381,0.09389349,0.0005805178,0.0019480871,0.3188833,0.01831027,0.50588214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065519643,0.00012591366,0.061078556,0.00034985912,0.000114871335,0.00003507992,0.023383273,0.00019733566,0.008251811,0.040589027,0.8643213,0.00089781196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9128893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96999425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.846011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031619056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020735164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011695981","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2007.19537","title":"Le droit de vote des détenus en droits canadien, sud-africain et conventionnel européen","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Democracy; Citizenship; Law; Warrant; Supreme court; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.033871886469537524,"score_gpt":0.31815675723698444,"score_spread":0.2842848707674469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011695981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747483,0.00021534582,0.022352505,0.0034802721,0.00031294912,0.00018284286,0.000026077794,0.00010238373,0.09857934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545843,0.00009231777,0.0013760378,0.0003649825,0.00040532943,0.0000124476355,0.000021338341,0.00002017136,0.012248959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982272,0.00020442912,0.00034852338,0.00028629578,0.00037040326,0.000563193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983493,0.0007507476,0.0001472255,0.00017219581,0.00026858677,0.00031195072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002501086,0.00012498969,0.00019102769,0.00015262977,0.00036543875,0.00012838014,0.0006265895,0.00008906562,0.00008823327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009773998,0.00017302025,0.00013115711,0.00023610587,0.00024944666,0.00030531472,0.00006528677,0.0002195959,0.00009083153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003181309,0.00010980859,0.038569383,0.00003318392,0.000041120264,0.0002050778,0.007384907,0.00023468942,0.00031313728,0.94740915,0.0010032379,0.0046644574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084865553,0.000113857575,0.36742026,0.0005594693,0.00007465607,0.00035652748,0.0052921167,0.002756509,0.00080815394,0.25893548,0.3621044,0.0007299494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085600354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31741798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010400712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047358856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9204887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015954017","doi":"10.7202/043326ar","title":"L'indemnisation des victimes de harcèlement sexuel au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02278429265146582,"score_gpt":0.29113102603519925,"score_spread":0.26834673338373344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015954017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9259206,0.004228677,0.00809252,0.033685103,0.0003285572,0.00018128412,0.000010584199,0.00007798214,0.02747466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9053812,0.0005281581,0.004250171,0.0014909657,0.00107445,0.000020456057,0.0000039123547,0.000019875617,0.0872308],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801457,0.00023022712,0.00027030552,0.00029140484,0.00036282968,0.00083064043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905133,0.0002607311,0.00011120794,0.00018120176,0.0000638593,0.0003316784],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010580751,0.00018220548,0.00018450372,0.00005551292,0.0012267013,0.00011894497,0.0003152144,0.00031531948,0.0010075263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000226177,0.00021815236,0.00013423308,0.00022975214,0.0017078484,0.0005123789,0.000033260752,0.0003527248,0.0004135893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038113754,0.00015163416,0.038897812,0.0001300155,0.000065422006,0.000023650713,0.23504391,0.000644224,0.0003811469,0.1905676,0.0038267896,0.5302297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002786531,0.00012750915,0.032703016,0.00016940811,0.00019849408,0.000027620277,0.025795395,0.0011783753,0.001191951,0.024091933,0.91381264,0.00042499954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35524398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5427658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90998584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011841497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013018259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018015607","doi":"10.7202/017295ar","title":"La déclaration de la victime au tribunal : évaluation de l’expérience du Palais de Justice de Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.17654845129408442,"score_gpt":0.4074500925927109,"score_spread":0.2309016412986265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018015607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96127903,0.00030186778,0.012258677,0.005366252,0.00011180321,0.00012201598,0.0000019523004,0.00016548547,0.020392884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902576,0.00061176735,0.0076809064,0.0005744618,0.0005784326,0.000038359318,0.0000032257376,0.0000088906045,0.00024631433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766576,0.0009421779,0.00019449771,0.00023999928,0.0002969854,0.00066058466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983149,0.0011648849,0.00008561334,0.00016070991,0.00009910261,0.00017475116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034705256,0.0001232651,0.00012774582,0.00005294037,0.0007460909,0.00014878303,0.00035101594,0.00029387887,0.00009940024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004159959,0.00012676342,0.000066153334,0.00014143642,0.0004496606,0.00039717506,0.00005126163,0.00026187868,0.00009158775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024419167,0.00038448026,0.061162394,0.0000981153,0.00003187886,0.00023669332,0.25350598,0.0052723573,0.015201659,0.0702126,0.01209499,0.58155465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075819663,0.00022106158,0.7306589,0.00009628518,0.0006078247,0.00019790941,0.041908678,0.0152929025,0.009947905,0.0170751,0.18262593,0.00060929614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008888165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034040252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66949654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001381152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014489855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018579699","doi":"10.7202/043087ar","title":"L'équité procédurale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Obligation; Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01889436163173303,"score_gpt":0.28219360520212783,"score_spread":0.2632992435703948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018579699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7529577,0.012766593,0.0012601127,0.10033449,0.00080708147,0.00024354548,0.00001355323,0.00012223552,0.13149469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69348985,0.00092272763,0.0016847599,0.0019150033,0.0017353714,0.00001184825,0.0000022253234,0.000016203605,0.300222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982852,0.00012799859,0.00021952004,0.00028861038,0.00034687264,0.00073183654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921554,0.00016079632,0.00008286091,0.00019691605,0.000056607732,0.00028727754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057421334,0.00015865793,0.00018878674,0.000039914594,0.00057710457,0.00010121048,0.00038700242,0.0003845738,0.0015311321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018295771,0.00018737344,0.00014782793,0.00030983373,0.0014416527,0.00045801865,0.00003167366,0.00046436684,0.0014113762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020444882,0.00009192839,0.0007233009,0.000093533294,0.000025033822,0.00004318052,0.028175207,0.00008167815,0.00018075592,0.61045086,0.034955796,0.32515827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012792302,0.000054568507,0.00082413777,0.00010360104,0.0000752974,0.000026581016,0.003760747,0.00022402033,0.00055925036,0.019126737,0.9748546,0.00026252243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025122187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003379391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013708163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016034865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019831013","doi":"10.7202/042697ar","title":"L'effectivité des décisions de la justice pénale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.017493310890399606,"score_gpt":0.3203086638213609,"score_spread":0.3028153529309613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019831013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8726282,0.00037670738,0.009798922,0.0012559429,0.00006608085,0.00008130076,0.000002706932,0.00009154557,0.11569857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98464596,0.0002431367,0.004662509,0.000499555,0.00036956518,0.000012253664,6.323432e-7,0.0000100025245,0.009556388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888325,0.00028044704,0.000089871624,0.00015257233,0.00019977066,0.00039411863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837047,0.0012493674,0.00003067953,0.00012121768,0.000032449603,0.00019580952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011966559,0.00007646103,0.00009823623,0.00004174735,0.00090683234,0.000100208585,0.00022836284,0.00017557098,0.00016314523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011934006,0.00008226864,0.00007422638,0.00017986499,0.00095265754,0.00020661575,0.000019636433,0.0002696506,0.00010399032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006038205,0.00016788227,0.0091623,0.00008680175,0.000030433366,0.00009597248,0.080056936,0.0005330285,0.002995765,0.60315526,0.011279948,0.2923753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035792566,0.00008709585,0.03660822,0.00013932072,0.00028409337,0.00006293024,0.015684363,0.00046049038,0.001789357,0.11193168,0.8321333,0.00046123512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024325626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041373167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82085335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007494973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013589325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69747126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020234690","doi":"10.7202/043292ar","title":"L'interprétation du Code civil du Québec : l'occasion d'une réforme de la responsabilité extracontractuelle de l'Administration publique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00851803363404038,"score_gpt":0.2746368465794925,"score_spread":0.26611881294545214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020234690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8505398,0.0013392504,0.028683372,0.098964885,0.00026667723,0.00027170643,0.000020503394,0.00010895974,0.019804852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785018,0.00094084797,0.0022163074,0.0017437779,0.0009434346,0.000046031215,0.000013592084,0.00003387306,0.015560332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996868,0.0010250503,0.00050512794,0.00042447294,0.0003948883,0.00078246184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968448,0.0020926148,0.00024233211,0.00025799306,0.0001427526,0.00041946268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038026292,0.00026060056,0.00026809456,0.00009505127,0.0008311731,0.00031006848,0.0004073208,0.0007380188,0.00075520005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023823804,0.00030850866,0.0002174487,0.00035429132,0.0016853614,0.0011123768,0.000030342078,0.00070902565,0.00010809126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016584287,0.0010433282,0.024509285,0.0002864763,0.00009117228,0.00032868143,0.21604197,0.0008937817,0.011668025,0.45075697,0.021718822,0.27100307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007486373,0.0004774503,0.037782468,0.00035325225,0.00023531874,0.00051894604,0.024703808,0.011103675,0.0059895897,0.03225185,0.8850953,0.00073969987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082172714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45629138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005259515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030183608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021585713","doi":"10.7202/1002076ar","title":"Du droit libéral au droit bureaucratique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche sociologique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.24214324089171613,"score_gpt":0.38789094293242476,"score_spread":0.14574770204070864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021585713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4795239,0.004660541,0.017375896,0.017110344,0.0020898858,0.0005950056,0.000023984374,0.00033635175,0.47828412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8695562,0.020065917,0.014919449,0.0031697687,0.0020139492,0.0001136157,0.000013586404,0.00006613351,0.09008141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843489,0.012713955,0.0005129896,0.0006746422,0.0002745426,0.0014749503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395615,0.004480113,0.00026566532,0.00044455656,0.00021497255,0.00063855614],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020034302,0.0004198009,0.0005656084,0.00007121914,0.00077753764,0.0000625009,0.0010075773,0.009714884,0.0014250289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00993406,0.00046879143,0.00042436013,0.00050067034,0.005487418,0.0005266452,0.00008744534,0.0071449094,0.00061627384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005907495,0.00015735498,0.0038675766,0.00009345991,0.00009465212,0.00012777037,0.17778888,0.0000033295887,0.00016501191,0.79687524,0.0041276566,0.016639972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028122033,0.00052699767,0.0037852137,0.00020312834,0.00021875936,0.00007227861,0.054393455,0.00008031284,0.0013779699,0.8711119,0.067072816,0.0008759293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015026896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027330657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3900323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007938579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035497767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20216342","doi":"10.1097/brs.0b013e3181bef192","title":"Jean-Claude Hébert. \"Droit pénal des affaires\".","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01972128699490294,"score_gpt":0.276723927990349,"score_spread":0.25700264099544606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20216342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7028391,0.0010386732,0.005394592,0.0013595179,0.00030142412,0.00018941339,0.000006383945,0.00018116104,0.28868973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630473,0.00030599203,0.0020433925,0.0004406342,0.0001769521,0.00001343809,0.000002200634,0.000019799376,0.033950288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981871,0.0002060521,0.00019148526,0.00029452724,0.00041957467,0.0007012538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989292,0.00038983853,0.000066449786,0.00022636385,0.00006910289,0.0003190682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009211487,0.00014542205,0.00018531524,0.00006642377,0.000989662,0.00013953917,0.00036311222,0.00024706012,0.000820502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013018844,0.00016403141,0.00013980533,0.00030556397,0.0012629818,0.00027780805,0.000017801944,0.00033464975,0.00024551604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027668131,0.000058777066,0.0042920806,0.00003535622,0.000026061793,0.00009360856,0.01597871,0.00003589568,0.00048791285,0.9553127,0.0038266156,0.019824594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003436126,0.00009414138,0.0032697076,0.000099957644,0.00008241083,0.00003192155,0.015794322,0.000037477235,0.0018864843,0.33121946,0.64657897,0.0005615056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039179865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009496628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64275235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008471672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019883054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89839214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022122013","doi":"10.7202/042668ar","title":"The Possible Impact of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Administrative Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.020192626669116597,"score_gpt":0.2996139951185351,"score_spread":0.2794213684494185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022122013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094382,0.001192451,0.0000030272438,0.012699699,0.00018580926,0.00016393699,0.00009034444,0.0000032551166,0.07622328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98561674,0.000070701375,0.000031586,0.00025898652,0.00015951833,0.0000028849063,6.922297e-7,0.0000050655276,0.0138538005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893427,0.0001561505,0.00017594754,0.00013243433,0.0002342595,0.00036696176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909073,0.00030579578,0.00012304772,0.00020164232,0.000060787977,0.00021799555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042017183,0.00010856866,0.00014756325,0.000020764537,0.0010706414,0.00006088766,0.0003127669,0.00018343177,0.00011665261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005509214,0.00006589819,0.00014053314,0.00016298922,0.004600373,0.00012489599,0.000012455878,0.00027309143,0.000009463052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032975775,0.00002694681,0.0009018769,0.000011925358,0.000048073634,0.00000393568,0.027987888,0.00002311962,0.00005653878,0.964662,0.0016782774,0.004566402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008632067,0.0019006813,0.123515405,0.0008911315,0.00038771445,0.00005715056,0.014570259,0.0005440348,0.008107909,0.40891042,0.43949297,0.0007591155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73238766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96160835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5557516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007741808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047128974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022732784","doi":"10.7202/042907ar","title":"Réforme des tribunaux administratifs et contrôle judiciaire: les inconsistances et les hésitations du Rapport Ouellette","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Administrative law","score_opus":0.03185750708640252,"score_gpt":0.3136875890923067,"score_spread":0.2818300820059042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022732784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500545,0.001455864,0.0074262097,0.048541706,0.00013205208,0.00030821518,0.000052562682,0.00021296937,0.0918159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98686385,0.00089463923,0.0032477449,0.0022190292,0.00024613764,0.000044466993,0.000024742718,0.000018522805,0.006440883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981266,0.0003097706,0.00034974754,0.00029971547,0.00039817713,0.00051596115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844533,0.00082708284,0.00016416429,0.00018091367,0.00015159135,0.00023091293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016029349,0.00018835015,0.0002696216,0.00007871831,0.0016088887,0.00022384133,0.00033503707,0.000266324,0.00021512271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009299637,0.00019876867,0.00015371386,0.00026030833,0.0017111608,0.00059758476,0.000024715691,0.00041181818,0.000047715785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010190486,0.00015791101,0.0135780545,0.000052192885,0.00007475976,0.0000712239,0.04687742,0.000089390436,0.00040300717,0.8682342,0.026625466,0.043734465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008013589,0.00020090715,0.030079724,0.00018190927,0.00018884,0.000045541732,0.066071905,0.00012551008,0.0006084793,0.07836055,0.82257736,0.00075792853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038733082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07084994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003983169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006072603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023878368","doi":"10.7202/1006413ar","title":"L’interprétation de la portée de la Loi sur l’assurance automobile : un éternel recommencement","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018567389516692227,"score_gpt":0.28187176628351335,"score_spread":0.2633043767668211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023878368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85047567,0.0018384283,0.017895855,0.002878456,0.00067569164,0.00023370184,0.000021820755,0.000106828615,0.12587355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97742975,0.0017252505,0.004685066,0.00091995223,0.00020381642,0.00004991204,0.0000051852035,0.000026294081,0.014954778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737525,0.0008971158,0.00032340328,0.00034898793,0.0002910711,0.00076418126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825656,0.0009509057,0.00019210034,0.00022661498,0.00006640274,0.00030742318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027924336,0.00020985528,0.00023120729,0.000056329252,0.0003926355,0.00013353929,0.0004619812,0.00047203802,0.0013517743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041026066,0.00024959337,0.00015846264,0.0002496652,0.0015975992,0.00037636465,0.000043461503,0.0005398119,0.00011419816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019890102,0.0007031508,0.047720812,0.00033736878,0.00015498885,0.0006122434,0.1980554,0.0001431486,0.0010375007,0.4438161,0.013060176,0.29416022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011180658,0.0005276232,0.16824849,0.001282286,0.00048050444,0.00031476375,0.023656808,0.003181286,0.0053275493,0.24954717,0.54498863,0.0013268085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0181216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018052581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5319285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016824217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041902863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024229701","doi":"10.7202/042890ar","title":"Approaches to the Reform of the Law of Theft","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06401139725772492,"score_gpt":0.2637545460460102,"score_spread":0.19974314878828525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024229701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63507533,0.0027496528,0.00029062387,0.13594131,0.00036055985,0.0002833938,0.000021528895,0.000010995441,0.22526658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682208,0.00012163629,0.0004973643,0.0012345164,0.00031273774,0.0000072777234,3.6106564e-7,0.0000081149465,0.029597223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879676,0.00016580001,0.00022970929,0.00014403755,0.00035272483,0.0003109932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922436,0.00016610589,0.0001342299,0.00035959433,0.000035339755,0.000080356906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009840603,0.00009677054,0.00016531916,0.000014480596,0.00038602552,0.000020523132,0.0007782737,0.00016750478,0.000091072456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007712393,0.000059316648,0.00017370438,0.00031938276,0.0023964194,0.00012343528,0.00007675086,0.0002700049,0.00003235609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014771066,0.000037753827,0.00011854666,0.00004199082,0.000018153867,3.7325975e-7,0.04682431,0.00022780061,0.000067553585,0.9229815,0.00062655506,0.029040707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011096415,0.000089771085,0.0025367385,0.00020825183,0.00014421313,0.000008232807,0.055499084,0.000215116,0.0061834254,0.038422298,0.8963975,0.00018444812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013821537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024931734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005342663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008054248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99286073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024507859","doi":"10.1353/utq.2005.0033","title":"Renegade Lawyer: The Life of J.L. Cohen (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Institution; Law; Opposition (politics); Face (sociological concept); Mentally ill; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.019087234132300398,"score_gpt":0.25910923426730553,"score_spread":0.24002200013500513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024507859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2794745,0.1000029,0.0012031298,0.08504386,0.00085801573,0.0015266578,0.00006479603,0.00017919549,0.53164697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934196,0.0048575276,0.00027196703,0.0001682489,0.000044862165,1.02722645e-7,9.769948e-7,0.000002326752,0.0012344029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993494,0.00008526953,0.0000965278,0.000095232506,0.00024803457,0.0001255217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947995,0.00006109671,0.00010876647,0.00017715992,0.000097201366,0.000075813376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030062415,0.00005053259,0.00014410204,0.000005954477,0.00021511728,0.0000041112903,0.0004181119,0.00003780239,0.00062462175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000349701,0.000045229786,0.00009524611,0.000036673828,0.0003596357,0.00025356415,0.000014714489,0.000037975315,0.000018407973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024489505,0.00046048025,0.0010282545,0.000863173,0.00021932807,0.000040491326,0.44088888,0.000032280983,0.00080419966,0.36034036,0.11803337,0.0770443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006411153,0.0006402387,0.0088502485,0.0008155438,0.00026075423,0.0000014745011,0.1260056,0.0000025447525,0.00004843605,0.0016361742,0.8608695,0.0002283133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29256314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21030563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7428362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009436507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016941493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8041042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024603388","doi":"10.5539/res.v7n6p255","title":"The Current Situation Concerning Investigative and Operational Search Powers of a Crime Investigator in Criminal Proceedings in the Former Soviet Union","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Legislation; Political science; The Republic; Criminal code; Criminal investigation; Law; Context (archaeology); Conformity; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Soviet union; Criminal law; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.2690170575682638,"score_gpt":0.4320444129616591,"score_spread":0.1630273553933953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024603388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.599726,0.3516533,0.000003918805,0.024603778,0.00010965377,0.0010068414,0.0000033808449,0.000008149299,0.02288493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89000165,0.10946721,0.00007699402,0.00036616166,0.00005000547,0.000012189594,0.00000106307,0.0000036500126,0.000021099191],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822944,0.0007741023,0.00034002,0.00011820068,0.000410318,0.0001278901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990421,0.000291613,0.0001411539,0.00005266538,0.0004204146,0.00005203519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074729812,0.00007305856,0.00018914467,0.0000311891,0.0001893707,0.000025322852,0.00018261444,0.0000073686915,0.0000012348453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005188846,0.000041477746,0.0000238376,0.00027141345,0.0011324256,0.00023308395,0.0000870431,0.000128006,0.0000024101776],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003752465,0.00008339996,0.030510848,0.006645169,0.000042823816,0.0000038499834,0.6946781,0.000004950332,0.00018518246,0.19888756,0.027065936,0.041854657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007106484,0.00052503287,0.14106487,0.03942084,0.00020069668,0.0000045809375,0.6204284,0.00004836084,0.00018753551,0.0044242437,0.19259322,0.00039159253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016836295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021033124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29027557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003878463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021390259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6211908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024845134","doi":"10.1093/icon/2.1.139","title":"Canada: Production of private records of victims of sexual assault in R. v. Shearing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.027850139708130797,"score_gpt":0.31555948460722366,"score_spread":0.2877093448990929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024845134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97906625,0.00013429881,0.0007620124,0.005876385,0.0021167202,0.00008289578,0.000026802938,0.0000026295752,0.011932023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985418,0.0000411712,0.0010744254,0.000048326914,0.00023999794,6.8082704e-7,0.0000018918282,0.0000019490676,0.000049799994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794143,0.00005104782,0.0006567409,0.00008495243,0.0011653631,0.00010043947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979863,0.000101404,0.0005519561,0.00005493071,0.00125561,0.000049781313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085267477,0.00006041715,0.00019267264,0.00012386541,0.000048721977,0.0000085435995,0.00030576487,0.0000486363,0.000047301677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060083193,0.000058660044,0.00004944622,0.00013996546,0.0009568829,0.00038390848,0.000028415749,0.00015097627,4.4462547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015593565,0.00011811223,0.009964082,0.000020773257,0.00005781927,0.000024505089,0.0004144285,0.006985995,0.0054876623,0.97618526,0.00012021728,0.00046522217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074970853,0.0013709464,0.23020208,0.0074819475,0.0003473271,0.0011907674,0.0076440237,0.00007972091,0.20357092,0.15748097,0.3819581,0.0011761137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42324948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43998605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042409328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003772926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6693009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026674214","doi":"10.7202/043359ar","title":"Le programme de clercs à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011625910762272988,"score_gpt":0.24022762242116194,"score_spread":0.22860171165888896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026674214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79775023,0.0035308525,0.0006996324,0.10894329,0.0005274689,0.00020389685,0.000023459104,0.00007237214,0.08824879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.909365,0.0005442808,0.0014090702,0.0017800838,0.0010036075,0.00001605981,0.0000032416258,0.000021966482,0.085856676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977097,0.0002630558,0.00021835633,0.00027104362,0.00041418412,0.0011236436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987764,0.0003622146,0.00008076304,0.00017729453,0.000069616704,0.0005337174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010752116,0.00016998244,0.00020583403,0.000025598003,0.00079018617,0.00014824134,0.0004226,0.00035417298,0.00022890164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000342779,0.00021317377,0.000107427135,0.00022620436,0.0011408266,0.00025888637,0.000031312808,0.0005015049,0.00004683967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020968031,0.00010085509,0.0017590648,0.000060330858,0.000030795334,0.00022714227,0.015164004,0.00019705393,0.000035986057,0.8460348,0.04286893,0.09350004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001856876,0.00003451121,0.0015749849,0.000057500256,0.00005364429,0.00008619091,0.0076224995,0.00042765366,0.00010923165,0.008413484,0.98116815,0.00026647482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9058009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97030735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030530246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041781655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8692974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027089951","doi":"10.7202/1027079ar","title":"Arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada en droit criminel, cuvée 2007 : les grandes tendances","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013029561241444665,"score_gpt":0.2579658671095471,"score_spread":0.24493630586810244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027089951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8834167,0.008140601,0.0008903438,0.022961129,0.002107997,0.00029787986,0.00007926453,0.00010137655,0.08200469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96709126,0.0040875934,0.0006440988,0.000601958,0.003661419,0.000029761602,0.00001025978,0.000043551594,0.023830092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963547,0.00083317916,0.00048080474,0.0005555512,0.0005421574,0.0012335931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968651,0.0018171322,0.00022328405,0.00037431737,0.00015675272,0.0005634326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024120547,0.00028997252,0.00054369686,0.000068610556,0.00076012244,0.00020729579,0.00083332503,0.00038393843,0.000854787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012753017,0.00041916236,0.00020781628,0.00034204038,0.0010345421,0.00039398953,0.00008605587,0.00051746727,0.000107616295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013463189,0.00035027435,0.10741586,0.0021178096,0.00016062953,0.0007651331,0.018009378,0.0010042553,0.0005415947,0.6461196,0.14367366,0.07970716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045109756,0.00013953952,0.03281654,0.0009362781,0.00029914544,0.00036318487,0.005038384,0.0012643153,0.0003451475,0.06803389,0.8894763,0.00083617616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8433794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74580264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012748691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012368539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027483662","doi":"10.7202/1021109ar","title":"La Charte Canadienne des droits et libertés à la lumière de la « révolution scientifique » et de la « révolution constitutionnelle » : l’exemple du droit constitutionnel du travail","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01132593808674906,"score_gpt":0.26520903106368693,"score_spread":0.2538830929769379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027483662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6771615,0.00779073,0.017182134,0.01156565,0.0008433879,0.0007397063,0.00006025238,0.0002447704,0.28441185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982289,0.0052721887,0.00058524846,0.00057451683,0.00051799853,0.00015939007,0.0000362417,0.00003517888,0.010530205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924693,0.0040190406,0.0005073209,0.0007503608,0.00042019974,0.0018337487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966884,0.0017420243,0.00023921215,0.0003519809,0.00032589806,0.00065243593],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006949611,0.0004155132,0.000406181,0.00016243584,0.001992469,0.0006673379,0.0005826652,0.00074140157,0.0008742416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014484813,0.00048470858,0.00023407525,0.00081763236,0.009409427,0.0014141503,0.000112778995,0.0010572985,0.00023775092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003237239,0.00033033293,0.002280395,0.00010936718,0.000059505823,0.00004526869,0.009842316,0.0004449551,0.0049361247,0.94570893,0.033059996,0.003150415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009708305,0.00016591731,0.021988984,0.00064759265,0.00023232329,0.0010001097,0.0016575907,0.0035942101,0.0005656798,0.18297097,0.78540665,0.0007991232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24051532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1896163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.762738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031374537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005640889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027877110","doi":"10.7202/042939ar","title":"Le droit et le fait dans l'application des standards et la clause limitative de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012633378250403194,"score_gpt":0.3003383003862277,"score_spread":0.28770492213582455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027877110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82784784,0.0015880264,0.0517803,0.018847182,0.00008932288,0.00033324838,0.00029834433,0.00012745243,0.099088304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713726,0.0023714167,0.0061296765,0.0017601876,0.00016736287,0.00009435661,0.00003795124,0.00006609607,0.018000351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596673,0.0014846036,0.00038420118,0.0005692139,0.0004760525,0.0011191826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973539,0.0012429991,0.0002066193,0.0003213423,0.00024895422,0.0006261705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046929796,0.00033702888,0.00037699132,0.000111931,0.0011367328,0.00033962697,0.0005542282,0.0005941401,0.00006972024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008240682,0.00043500203,0.0001908772,0.000563873,0.0044499394,0.0012039441,0.00006744295,0.0009067101,0.000038429105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055360484,0.00016644687,0.0004998427,0.000076552235,0.00005786134,0.000042212345,0.16521676,0.00048986543,0.0009943828,0.7794499,0.0008940678,0.05205679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080290105,0.00023184322,0.017473703,0.00041310198,0.00019118888,0.00012337197,0.04430356,0.00091442803,0.0016794506,0.38640133,0.54668427,0.0007808647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16234644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65538466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003502407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021462895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028056940","doi":"10.7202/004758ar","title":"Transformations récentes de la législation fédérale sur la mise en liberté sous condition au Canada. Une lecture à la lumière des écrits sur la notion de risque","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0825559660627647,"score_gpt":0.31527762422932476,"score_spread":0.23272165816656004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028056940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8633363,0.0069699045,0.004085095,0.031440273,0.0005525278,0.0004473812,0.00016490328,0.0002394236,0.09276415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898871,0.004926299,0.00041099705,0.00023540149,0.00028446544,0.00003264765,0.000059354494,0.000025589368,0.0041381293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964954,0.0016596395,0.00037299146,0.00032839755,0.00035115515,0.00079241436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995834,0.0034403685,0.00013694777,0.00019401281,0.00017427893,0.00022039539],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085694337,0.0002877036,0.00027758512,0.00008952021,0.00081377,0.000209866,0.0003395083,0.00067448354,0.00023116946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016293452,0.0003122384,0.00013691229,0.00036972438,0.0011823886,0.0009864821,0.00003182707,0.0005543457,0.000041627234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011761037,0.0009052774,0.01413458,0.0017563605,0.00017349482,0.00057707523,0.14704055,0.009856686,0.003918517,0.076022215,0.08549338,0.66000426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012834487,0.00022283834,0.08477216,0.0012894649,0.0007890576,0.0004744822,0.010273659,0.008654269,0.00572884,0.020448124,0.86489624,0.0011674267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5821471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66764134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77940285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013537011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016863993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028321787","doi":"10.7202/043740ar","title":"La multiplicité des rôles du ministre de l’Environnement s’oppose-t-elle à l’exigence de l’impartialité ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0205978200748131,"score_gpt":0.28025544112119455,"score_spread":0.25965762104638146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028321787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95075643,0.0072286646,0.006441521,0.016797695,0.00022678905,0.00025085016,0.00003885177,0.00010301384,0.018156191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641044,0.005024941,0.008362527,0.0012254042,0.0010137291,0.000045184428,0.0000064874394,0.00004146259,0.020175824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965144,0.00060651347,0.0004431974,0.0005159242,0.00045832284,0.0014616365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980477,0.0006755651,0.00017264516,0.00034998174,0.000054561406,0.0006995251],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017235546,0.000346999,0.00033817592,0.00006277425,0.0013541835,0.0001974712,0.0007032434,0.0006159996,0.00089736213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004195465,0.00041379195,0.00026800783,0.00030765403,0.0037363921,0.0003819895,0.000099160105,0.00058166205,0.00030367388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013686219,0.0007795067,0.033635024,0.00039551314,0.00013455536,0.00042990426,0.17268905,0.0030517024,0.0038978227,0.39899442,0.0061788484,0.3796768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058654486,0.00021923713,0.014633581,0.00047048763,0.0003299204,0.00021253902,0.037303828,0.0049258163,0.006524432,0.019205743,0.91469646,0.00089140295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009685097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014760703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030012866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003802737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029366972","doi":"10.7202/042669ar","title":"Vers une judiciarisation du Conseil des ministres?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Duty; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01813469499984094,"score_gpt":0.2797943943182887,"score_spread":0.26165969931844774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029366972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90957403,0.00016848717,0.0010132683,0.009092713,0.00009133046,0.000071565344,0.0000029852506,0.000073997515,0.0799116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928976,0.00024008723,0.0010399688,0.00059924804,0.00030071405,0.0000058127425,0.000003394843,0.0000067011742,0.00490646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991938,0.000069483576,0.00011460841,0.00013837473,0.00020316585,0.00028059477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950135,0.00018541061,0.000049365422,0.00009398793,0.000045074386,0.00012481262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003813806,0.00006770755,0.00008768765,0.00003429412,0.0006826998,0.000067590765,0.00016038082,0.00013520049,0.00012288721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037302438,0.00007808835,0.000053641936,0.00017526503,0.001101185,0.00018693287,0.000008976906,0.00013628247,0.000112322305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012216148,0.00015354212,0.016147228,0.000041387495,0.00004633974,0.00007204997,0.16383138,0.00021157897,0.0007383634,0.4445365,0.032970548,0.34112892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028093715,0.00006186417,0.012326965,0.000046290133,0.000056965386,0.000009203125,0.024565347,0.00013407273,0.00063067477,0.028901426,0.93274206,0.0002442202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014548926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017320642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8997715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008574379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022312091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202945015","doi":"","title":"Negligent investigation by police : can a duty of care be found using the existing negligence principles in Australia?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Duty of care; Law; Tort; Officer; Supreme court; Suspect; High Court; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.12935925179575092,"score_gpt":0.32430045712901234,"score_spread":0.19494120533326142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202945015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963312,0.000066137894,0.00008617338,0.002145878,0.000032897984,0.00017962062,0.000013583287,0.000035264486,0.0011092459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827486,0.00013774226,0.0012316196,0.00001243138,0.000010133236,2.780004e-7,0.0000017734014,0.000003123081,0.0003280641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912167,0.000072292016,0.00016260886,0.00020115946,0.00021545228,0.00022684892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933064,0.00005870154,0.00018955601,0.00022551787,0.00014564587,0.00004991342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020219758,0.00008565416,0.00016911785,0.00014487735,0.000460784,0.0000052864953,0.00047334735,0.00015906562,0.000023266637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121443874,0.00008579234,0.000044479668,0.000503642,0.001359458,0.00010388763,0.0001447519,0.00017232014,0.0000014156191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046975147,0.000051678762,0.87541854,0.00008899494,0.000024288616,0.000031424763,0.093371846,0.00027701128,0.005492936,0.023590311,0.00019066772,0.001415307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010874278,0.00025340857,0.4331738,0.0009640847,0.00016725715,0.0000329256,0.45469776,0.00032070288,0.034380477,0.004805391,0.06925518,0.0008615776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23224731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095824346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44224477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018886819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021425709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9206745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030013073","doi":"10.7202/042657ar","title":"Faut-il réformer la Cour suprême du Canada ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Nomination; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Charter; Subject (documents); Due Process Clause","score_opus":0.008819078932390347,"score_gpt":0.24540869726955652,"score_spread":0.23658961833716619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030013073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88276434,0.0001815057,0.0002589246,0.013790973,0.0001794301,0.00008211774,0.000011418172,0.00005610613,0.1026752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97302,0.00013846556,0.00028914827,0.0014214831,0.00043118285,0.00000607882,0.0000024049818,0.000009131507,0.024682099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988988,0.00007122126,0.0001189662,0.00014922325,0.00034787218,0.00041389078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938184,0.00021835841,0.000039070626,0.000114372124,0.000042299267,0.00020405662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046731232,0.00008429035,0.00010891842,0.000022831171,0.0004863908,0.00006714374,0.00026491785,0.00013017695,0.0003615662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022152536,0.00008945351,0.00004886084,0.00011601487,0.00033454082,0.00017850028,0.000014413916,0.00021747737,0.00005097996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043060445,0.00006151213,0.015565865,0.000035927013,0.000041850883,0.00021579237,0.035993833,0.00015876544,0.00021246701,0.7178089,0.15853865,0.07132334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008382451,0.0000088609695,0.0028645182,0.000010116228,0.000015827321,0.0000114439845,0.0043540746,0.000049313945,0.000080411926,0.0019722402,0.9904124,0.00013696883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84953517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.972025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00121396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076201913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39588964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030437824","doi":"10.7202/043304ar","title":"L'évaluation des objectifs législatifs en vertu de l'article premier de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017494695588873586,"score_gpt":0.286758690292126,"score_spread":0.2692639947032524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030437824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95771945,0.002525471,0.0040496318,0.006273191,0.00021157438,0.00022900681,0.000014865111,0.00009279534,0.028884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94279236,0.0011137698,0.008480206,0.0010403224,0.00052212056,0.0000365027,0.000005271377,0.00004193385,0.045967493],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630576,0.0012531165,0.00032930967,0.0004023329,0.0003459928,0.0013634829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976947,0.0012080576,0.00010937368,0.00025063576,0.00011299634,0.0006242945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039285617,0.00025578972,0.00025931554,0.00008913463,0.00092511205,0.00023987662,0.00037516907,0.00055865676,0.0004786306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014647197,0.0003130465,0.00015655294,0.0004880808,0.0021100005,0.0008640252,0.000043922315,0.0006204693,0.00013466385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006438676,0.0001537396,0.023031408,0.00011823802,0.000075568045,0.000064165746,0.43599305,0.0019363015,0.0048040976,0.14512737,0.00092212326,0.38770956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010508443,0.00031170525,0.23417047,0.00074546284,0.00061138376,0.0003127732,0.01567851,0.020097263,0.009247972,0.4623956,0.25422293,0.001155083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10641959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29534185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42031452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007560448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008033978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030652659","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0020","title":"The Contextual Turn: Iacobucci's Legacy and the Standard of Review in Administrative Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Standard of review; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Scrutiny; Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02791156109271762,"score_gpt":0.3187172411592737,"score_spread":0.29080568006655605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030652659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036472924,0.0970898,0.00033940675,0.029674236,0.0003313491,0.00057722605,0.000016926539,0.000010134619,0.835488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97784483,0.021609914,0.00009549557,0.00012949496,0.00004352854,2.7287639e-8,1.13514396e-7,0.0000014065364,0.00027519788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.00027998118,0.00018152017,0.000066274595,0.0003257255,0.00016057007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988693,0.0005642588,0.00021587836,0.00008014688,0.00018951342,0.000080880374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032922733,0.000054234868,0.00019913018,0.000004860313,0.00097017916,0.000037912094,0.00030702047,0.00003385165,0.00017136591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261102,0.000035342367,0.00008190306,0.000031628133,0.001934459,0.000514271,0.00004140582,0.00014270381,4.727547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078122824,0.00001392328,0.00009071113,0.000024015402,0.000019576171,0.000022187796,0.013687091,1.6495085e-7,0.0000044431977,0.9783027,0.00086673285,0.0061872164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010523831,0.00019640988,0.00084238756,0.00060552376,0.00006648746,0.000017555387,0.13601013,7.7886403e-7,0.000028618453,0.002032595,0.8590745,0.00007268344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11633828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8525948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97627014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014697194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011756685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8895461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031021223","doi":"10.4000/vertigo.8931","title":"Droit d’accès à l’information environnementale : pierre d’assise du développement durable","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"VertigO","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01752975278729941,"score_gpt":0.26490729986263745,"score_spread":0.24737754707533804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031021223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4026083,0.0076532513,0.0033426487,0.34399632,0.006343762,0.0009831508,0.000047691537,0.00022254178,0.23480234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788435,0.0050390153,0.0010604304,0.002653031,0.00060775125,0.000014400938,0.000026600641,0.000008163626,0.011747079],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799764,0.00008400264,0.00043185713,0.0002361192,0.0006139192,0.00063646643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923116,0.00004659058,0.00015350991,0.00024879992,0.000059416852,0.00026050836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004046126,0.00020713254,0.00020299823,0.00006542362,0.00094575697,0.00019062913,0.0003695242,0.00015051445,0.0042057703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007964899,0.00023009615,0.00013297256,0.00033997104,0.00029934704,0.0021542707,0.00005885171,0.00016072516,0.0028791192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000885682,0.0005241689,0.0068753785,0.00010392959,0.00004191925,0.000033965014,0.02090179,0.00010574221,0.00045074648,0.21621883,0.34365407,0.4110009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004047299,0.00022033832,0.019840505,0.00015024256,0.00007856496,0.000006113573,0.0051682754,0.000420727,0.0006216347,0.004554742,0.9682007,0.00033344983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089996425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033102528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62454665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005461111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012550331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033722102","doi":"10.7202/1008030ar","title":"L’interprétation du droit par les juristes : la place de la délibération éthique","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017540849897331033,"score_gpt":0.30058089237453794,"score_spread":0.28304004247720693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033722102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7568143,0.009163498,0.023253778,0.027107738,0.001140939,0.00043260533,0.000020921567,0.00023243908,0.1818338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861024,0.0049316157,0.0030080786,0.0012844433,0.001241278,0.00005006272,0.0000127755875,0.00004143923,0.003327907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563617,0.0025416787,0.00037381088,0.00030980358,0.0003277761,0.00081079453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714994,0.0019232399,0.00022499078,0.00020043792,0.00013981583,0.00036159126],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004276345,0.0002749965,0.0002612489,0.00007326724,0.00076757855,0.00026784756,0.00034369505,0.0010898772,0.00031949268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011873062,0.00031253535,0.00017167846,0.00025385985,0.0011762345,0.0009338291,0.000068106616,0.0008725365,0.00015468098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009251795,0.00020086941,0.031100487,0.00024172437,0.000047562444,0.00003918699,0.0655132,0.0002896722,0.001488596,0.8680712,0.0057033096,0.027211642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005107191,0.0002137514,0.031770844,0.0010017543,0.00031152146,0.00024744094,0.023271076,0.0029404275,0.005674691,0.09788011,0.8351015,0.0010761782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012206236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003002289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82939816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007674381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033804102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033744269","doi":"10.1350/ijps.5.2.112.14322","title":"The Right to Silence and Undercover Police Operations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Police Science & Management","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law enforcement; Criminology; Political science; Law; Enforcement; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.023395089049803995,"score_gpt":0.37365521652212325,"score_spread":0.35026012747231927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033744269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65861946,0.00019896381,0.004574354,0.06661022,0.0033483035,0.00039420437,0.000004427616,0.000021076708,0.266229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940357,0.00039625983,0.001310473,0.0014959329,0.00022189594,0.0000034333718,4.846919e-8,0.000002945869,0.0025333131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979775,0.00007762772,0.00025432635,0.00014596316,0.0012696604,0.00027493772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891096,0.00012915429,0.00009161865,0.00011910784,0.0005329498,0.00021619715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022595525,0.00006972159,0.00006883842,0.00021070869,0.0009852984,0.00073259766,0.0011340289,0.000015315574,0.00006876035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026357354,0.00004943347,0.000039450566,0.0004198981,0.0006183921,0.000850602,0.00012727549,0.00008539612,0.00003183708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011752811,0.00003484557,0.00023665122,0.0000017627111,0.000023304767,0.0000073218434,0.012654954,0.00042637973,0.00053257414,0.97628325,0.002111364,0.007675836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034244562,0.000099693054,0.014852229,0.00012398044,0.000043467666,0.00007252125,0.051215183,0.00007918011,0.0011732082,0.013938849,0.9178168,0.00024244403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004711943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00555924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025002635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023981128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75782186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033979548","doi":"10.7202/1000617ar","title":"L’héritage de l’affaire Roncarelli c. Duplessis 1959-2009","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02911325364606312,"score_gpt":0.30967330317632874,"score_spread":0.28056004953026564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033979548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07193016,0.008727692,0.00014041773,0.0780063,0.0130907325,0.00020528403,0.0001630624,0.000101022706,0.82763535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113924,0.00243966,0.0020047645,0.0008710236,0.0034791878,0.0000040770765,0.0000017666634,0.000038860413,0.010021401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966517,0.0003886424,0.0005437063,0.000354208,0.0008114269,0.0012502837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787337,0.00026351944,0.00028457728,0.00030796783,0.00027024164,0.0010003211],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002125648,0.0003084568,0.00036904076,0.0000611442,0.008288468,0.00037753195,0.0008283966,0.00047440085,0.0049441108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024130178,0.00030768395,0.00039698218,0.0003384208,0.0012579188,0.0010659425,0.0000988706,0.0019157678,0.0006660716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031685344,0.0002064795,0.00066699134,0.000055026023,0.000050802075,0.0006315318,0.0015379142,0.000030332905,0.0007753686,0.9113113,0.013074834,0.071627736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002734692,0.00012238062,0.0004939815,0.0002365643,0.00014610756,0.0009195161,0.0029429635,0.00007270166,0.0006062015,0.008106716,0.985686,0.0003933834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017935237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15991856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028960238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010988221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034604088","doi":"10.7202/042563ar","title":"Une doctrine d'abus de procédure revigorée en droit pénal canadien","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Denial; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.009680553915968441,"score_gpt":0.2699886804967939,"score_spread":0.26030812658082547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034604088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89809036,0.0006830269,0.0010976065,0.018601503,0.00013102748,0.00032009723,0.000012846332,0.00016212196,0.08090144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668461,0.00035984966,0.0016428316,0.0011629049,0.0009156513,0.000025777128,0.0000062447457,0.000018723844,0.029021882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981609,0.00013476804,0.00022437447,0.00029883586,0.00037287414,0.0008082383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990193,0.00018107634,0.000081267404,0.00022075008,0.00007008542,0.00042751315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010007955,0.00014962391,0.0002128004,0.00007211504,0.00058987417,0.00009389642,0.00049330114,0.0002728649,0.00025570154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037689717,0.00016804774,0.00010793762,0.00039342977,0.00043507328,0.00024962839,0.000026823747,0.00047063487,0.000097694676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011305072,0.00010425874,0.00933163,0.00013551068,0.0000712375,0.00037208718,0.0850089,0.00033200468,0.00060991966,0.71737456,0.017402232,0.16914459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039205392,0.00009284246,0.010785803,0.00015658894,0.00011302652,0.0000967838,0.0070813484,0.00018097255,0.00068817695,0.021656321,0.9582213,0.000534781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06404529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20594318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002795194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004453397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9421873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037174929","doi":"10.7202/1000625ar","title":"Roncarelli v. Duplessis and Damages for Abuse of Power: For What Did It Stand in 1959 and For What Does It Stand in 2009?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Damages; Supreme court; Liability; Tort; Economic Justice; Abuse of power; Sociology; Power (physics); Common law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07964043449649322,"score_gpt":0.3457996897785181,"score_spread":0.2661592552820249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037174929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9554178,0.025806852,0.00070531655,0.008573124,0.0011504766,0.0020545772,0.000490238,0.000018673718,0.0057829213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633511,0.034509476,0.0016742409,0.00015182275,0.00007582939,0.00003870587,0.000001476898,0.000017290258,0.0001800682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857616,0.000080933474,0.00043480934,0.00024743087,0.00023184188,0.00042880117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988133,0.00050642836,0.00019925692,0.00010218946,0.00020730516,0.00017154987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016647212,0.00014784094,0.00034403964,0.00009609955,0.0010096056,0.00034253186,0.0001916561,0.00011762381,0.00003720129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015082769,0.00011515952,0.00008466123,0.000093541596,0.00032254437,0.0023524528,0.000029811152,0.0001245037,2.0886566e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008639526,0.0013306043,0.015696842,0.0027295554,0.00029494814,0.00010191091,0.26985723,0.000036022808,0.001050486,0.5731142,0.005216166,0.12193251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030863306,0.00076240365,0.001631249,0.0021703297,0.000094270035,0.000014896756,0.23266691,0.00004783933,0.001925521,0.012467208,0.7447294,0.00040361108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019005276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1264575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7395133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010944914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035254645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8894824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037436209","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.1.0196","title":"Professor Waldron Goes to Canada (One More Time): The Canadian Charter and the Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Political science; Judicial review; Law; Legitimacy; Legislature; State (computer science); Law and economics; Separation of powers; Bill of rights; Power (physics); Constitutional law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01689867215698869,"score_gpt":0.29956660198958646,"score_spread":0.28266792983259775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037436209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009210821,0.015668193,1.8075247e-7,0.9215429,0.0006266502,0.0016710303,0.000032849428,0.000024854342,0.051222537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456656,0.0019075838,0.000016728702,0.03982481,0.000316873,0.0001290283,0.000008080662,0.0000120430495,0.012119273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984904,0.0002928612,0.00023705247,0.00020290581,0.00037742773,0.00039934233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987461,0.00030054068,0.0000715426,0.00045708177,0.000096114876,0.00032862698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013802528,0.00014092815,0.00031801793,0.000014310639,0.001851259,0.0001850467,0.0006635712,0.000039059883,0.0004345645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001274152,0.00007463562,0.000057148623,0.00024935996,0.0006662458,0.00009300455,0.0000794033,0.00036962092,0.00006258358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017623574,0.00002267326,0.0004655248,0.0004289569,0.00003285969,0.000014631741,0.003504243,1.3712321e-7,0.000015588808,0.64883107,0.33014843,0.016518224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008134009,0.0000050229137,0.001661833,0.0007345859,0.000065208886,0.0000025218833,0.00015929317,0.0000031235209,0.000002826497,0.0003449427,0.99681294,0.00012638011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001393287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054818374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037504092","doi":"10.7202/042667ar","title":"La justice constitutionnelle en France","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Sociology","score_opus":0.011285378349540652,"score_gpt":0.28425290092337385,"score_spread":0.2729675225738332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037504092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49685848,0.00071724696,0.018813426,0.008911379,0.00027074467,0.00012420723,0.000005580453,0.00014948736,0.47414944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97908396,0.00021361033,0.0019556324,0.00079982216,0.00044545726,0.000005942654,8.8060165e-7,0.0000043840846,0.017490325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992522,0.0001161062,0.00008813323,0.00012799783,0.00017323969,0.00024232622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993819,0.00035805043,0.000028350634,0.000094014824,0.000029502342,0.00010819814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005813037,0.000057273304,0.000075976364,0.000023361512,0.00055147894,0.000048521902,0.00019524907,0.00016191162,0.0002517488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004322786,0.00006400104,0.00004248356,0.000111803696,0.0008558232,0.0001750691,0.000011483488,0.0002261058,0.0002269108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006885299,0.000019881198,0.0006004596,0.000017391389,0.0000052672326,0.000018684175,0.01972671,0.00015446224,0.00010577136,0.9524532,0.0032191612,0.023672132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100854726,0.000007876204,0.00097637856,0.00002514195,0.000039531486,0.000009510233,0.0071679996,0.00008390863,0.00012922441,0.0066760858,0.9846713,0.00011218915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084141095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009900532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98145217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031992333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011726343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42415857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038744157","doi":"10.7202/004738ar","title":"Judiciarisation et déjudiciarisation : la part de la poursuite et de la défense","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.3380579277308897,"score_gpt":0.4541859260833446,"score_spread":0.11612799835245491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038744157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6241081,0.0069766175,0.0015434895,0.071820565,0.0010256736,0.00023726713,0.0000148182025,0.00028033517,0.29399315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97523135,0.0153614795,0.0014207058,0.0034459194,0.00052568567,0.000033065437,0.000009151276,0.00002868341,0.0039439714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310744,0.0048380475,0.00036495796,0.00044316534,0.00043175768,0.00081464316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406034,0.0050896006,0.00021979504,0.00031095344,0.00010593073,0.00021339548],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055529177,0.00026885985,0.00028931792,0.00010622571,0.00048298872,0.0003625864,0.00041619962,0.0008767121,0.0009601956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044881226,0.0003002843,0.00015568067,0.00028884242,0.001973069,0.0006074987,0.000115569965,0.00084777636,0.0004765455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042541807,0.000568221,0.018702144,0.00009891182,0.00005625058,0.0002687653,0.052383628,0.00045199107,0.0007726746,0.4768809,0.11425711,0.33551687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000353186,0.00013586656,0.11566036,0.00024870876,0.00029836947,0.000076811746,0.0058765276,0.0007644411,0.00032987268,0.09637972,0.77945733,0.0004188118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010048823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066093577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66520023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005932588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049413886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038960565","doi":"10.5235/09615768.24.1.1","title":"Blurring the Civil-Criminal Divide for Process Rights: Closed Material Procedures and the Curious Character of Preventive Security Measures","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"King s Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Suspect; Certificate; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Terrorism; Preventive detention; Order (exchange); Character (mathematics); Business; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.017749985142434244,"score_gpt":0.3005557168032032,"score_spread":0.28280573166076894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038960565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907116,0.0003593613,0.000084084786,0.0049189194,0.00045606034,0.0008033685,0.0000074533973,0.000018430865,0.0026406795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855447,0.000062018116,0.000046126035,0.00018028932,0.001039898,0.000057700126,5.622986e-7,0.0000088893585,0.000050036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983864,0.0003070249,0.00032316303,0.00015332813,0.00049017934,0.00033990806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987525,0.00037677548,0.00033644374,0.000102009726,0.00034989882,0.00008237193],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019586924,0.00012682022,0.00021538229,0.000024123763,0.002226314,0.0005271906,0.0004227914,0.00005998584,0.00010869707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035570146,0.00006457822,0.00011237364,0.000058432495,0.00090252294,0.00056922686,0.000049110047,0.00022665027,0.0000021008548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015716188,0.00023873211,0.002145846,0.0008751864,0.0003423172,0.000011907873,0.30484274,0.0000106436155,0.002064563,0.67481863,0.00221507,0.010862739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003115602,0.00028727527,0.011666877,0.0018296,0.00085710984,0.00026541855,0.022557361,0.00014211544,0.009349717,0.8857923,0.0634821,0.0006545242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004932021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01516125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28228536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002762627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012679031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040229749","doi":"10.1080/02722010609481400","title":"Cross-Border Crime Stories: American Media, Canadian Law, and Murder in the Internet Age","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Publication; Freedom of information; Criminology; Freedom of the press; Sociology","score_opus":0.043130208280106365,"score_gpt":0.4224151373906914,"score_spread":0.37928492911058503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040229749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35502645,0.3352548,0.0000010980799,0.093411624,0.00033973958,0.0011290701,0.00011015214,0.000028905648,0.21469818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100944,0.07107454,0.00004182697,0.018035252,0.00015909263,0.000045251607,0.000003244908,0.000010543602,0.00053589366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809116,0.00043529674,0.00033890177,0.00022140097,0.00033996097,0.0005732901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984225,0.0006527229,0.00021743742,0.0003132816,0.00017351314,0.00022053851],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014504419,0.00016884677,0.00057047897,0.00016748748,0.0004992592,0.00006828949,0.00051697314,0.000016534948,0.000074092335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006609864,0.00010596918,0.0000716727,0.0013583923,0.006826429,0.000099554905,0.000039417064,0.0001665123,0.000010247914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031401556,0.000050543087,0.052891202,0.0014765537,0.0002777778,0.00036444748,0.19846253,0.0000034521945,0.0000045985857,0.39499417,0.20915072,0.14229262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035751822,0.0000363634,0.06714547,0.00052821153,0.000054293563,0.000004037893,0.03138157,1.9313308e-7,7.782007e-7,0.00044546442,0.90022206,0.0001457927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69107133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027249457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057054765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99587643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204023354","doi":"","title":"Code de procédure civile du Québec. Complément, jurisprudence et doctrine, 15e édition (H.Reid, J.Reid).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Computer science; Code (set theory); Philosophy; Programming language; Theology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.028119077550317464,"score_gpt":0.2980201067990636,"score_spread":0.26990102924874615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204023354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5693755,0.009654604,0.0042513404,0.19413392,0.0016957774,0.0011771425,0.000208701,0.00040776224,0.21909525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461793,0.010956888,0.0007441588,0.0020338323,0.0025806446,0.00010325646,0.000038679158,0.000049712504,0.03731357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646926,0.00044951588,0.0005749839,0.0006858684,0.0005554163,0.0012649313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979771,0.00046635655,0.00033341665,0.0004821394,0.00021153832,0.0005294627],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014162824,0.0003130254,0.000492917,0.00010887048,0.0007807874,0.00026499727,0.0008072085,0.00035835832,0.0028522594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036834643,0.00047483706,0.000283357,0.00079297577,0.0007573308,0.00096516777,0.0001427648,0.0005961361,0.0013400088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029342048,0.0012265077,0.14289717,0.0015141297,0.00014153021,0.0016418925,0.021849124,0.0012695943,0.0010692237,0.5537562,0.24963991,0.024701292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005255802,0.0002567226,0.022237193,0.001318551,0.00022896401,0.000816768,0.0016540848,0.0020683028,0.00025661074,0.023519004,0.9463461,0.0007721118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07086862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17791606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6967062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016424143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011098124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W204119075","doi":"10.29173/alr292","title":"The Police Officer’s Plight: The Intersection of Policing and the Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Law; Law enforcement; Officer; Criminal justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Crime control; Situational ethics; Criminology; Pretext; Discretion; CLARITY; Sociology","score_opus":0.04921144117726327,"score_gpt":0.34931352379587144,"score_spread":0.30010208261860816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W204119075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009510105,0.06568562,0.0000050072676,0.19330046,0.00043645847,0.00087497203,8.8626757e-7,0.000015962192,0.73017055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97421384,0.018339803,0.000003976232,0.00591741,0.00017646361,0.000020590003,3.0771525e-7,0.000005299324,0.0013223249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877316,0.00048386768,0.00022493476,0.00010509346,0.00023668996,0.00017623429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979354,0.0014976073,0.00013570486,0.0002785945,0.00008984028,0.00006286628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022045493,0.00007590564,0.00017856382,0.0000032133346,0.0007797161,0.0000761778,0.00037459418,0.000027580898,0.000015206645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040811658,0.00003070303,0.00007855546,0.00016028839,0.001248465,0.0001389087,0.000078758094,0.000100404475,0.000030122406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011583617,0.000003503121,0.000014467031,0.00006580419,0.000009932698,4.910646e-8,0.009735995,1.5944005e-7,0.0000012166845,0.9848003,0.0033879913,0.0019690087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009267423,0.000016257449,0.000021779268,0.0006052657,0.00009144266,0.000005194693,0.002325306,0.0000048685188,0.000010129872,0.0026188833,0.9941601,0.00004806573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72328043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6403657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034225366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052697585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5997025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041703113","doi":"10.7202/042278ar","title":"L'enquête publique et le pouvoir de condamnation pour outrage au tribunal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Legislator; Punishment (psychology); Jurisdiction; Power (physics); Political science; Conviction; Psychology; Social psychology; Legislation","score_opus":0.016334197338007977,"score_gpt":0.29744166155342705,"score_spread":0.2811074642154191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041703113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8479008,0.00011093988,0.013457687,0.054662034,0.00010061022,0.00016653634,0.000012061051,0.00012988037,0.083459444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98380417,0.00004945482,0.0017396763,0.0027946075,0.0003563743,0.000016991495,0.000009389185,0.0000116727915,0.011217642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987454,0.00019742732,0.0001576549,0.00018709246,0.0002580328,0.00045443975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993251,0.00021176455,0.000072691204,0.000116602576,0.00007520922,0.00019862305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012893588,0.00009386748,0.00012285214,0.000067247376,0.0004888693,0.00014009234,0.00026764872,0.00021820246,0.00013059251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057064166,0.000107211694,0.00009157571,0.0001573411,0.00030197835,0.00047237572,0.000016704565,0.0003146986,0.00005352184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027868693,0.00006179955,0.0017955445,0.00001211218,0.000013543962,0.000015089684,0.020642392,0.00013505128,0.0012119431,0.9609919,0.004459082,0.010633665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008587386,0.00006360011,0.01995112,0.00005689029,0.000053945387,0.000027770087,0.015600832,0.00064610114,0.004157062,0.069752924,0.88834304,0.0004879664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006328505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02059614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013990263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011580442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042046526","doi":"10.7202/043466ar","title":"La concrétisation de la primauté du droit dans l'ordre juridique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00824723053923736,"score_gpt":0.26514582993134655,"score_spread":0.2568985993921092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042046526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8173569,0.0016613976,0.011050208,0.013585039,0.00029218217,0.00018991584,0.00001933047,0.00011204563,0.15573297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539831,0.0017867371,0.0024755,0.0011648878,0.001138001,0.00002324386,0.000009014694,0.000033874167,0.039385602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974004,0.0008591945,0.0003063211,0.00036504143,0.00037852267,0.000690533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982506,0.0009748275,0.00015003093,0.00023184544,0.00006541648,0.0003272824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020598196,0.00022094617,0.00025678347,0.000059470643,0.0006003467,0.0002039672,0.0004323442,0.00083062344,0.00040664335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004777903,0.00028256487,0.00018286894,0.00029572775,0.0025825347,0.00050318806,0.00004087107,0.00077444525,0.00023526265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028470742,0.000090520574,0.0032289012,0.00008031376,0.0000326141,0.00012123217,0.060615554,0.0002788503,0.0007599854,0.8419075,0.0045260894,0.088329956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036034107,0.00007452074,0.011809845,0.00018976323,0.00016434868,0.00020592764,0.008407416,0.00085000833,0.0016952236,0.055624057,0.92016244,0.0004560803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007028694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058079595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91563636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032590346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007167774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042170054","doi":"10.1080/13642980310001726126","title":"The new globalism in Canadian charter of rights interpretation: extradition, the death penalty, and the courts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Human rights; Law; Discretion; Charter; Political science; Politics; State (computer science); Bill of rights; International human rights law; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.020557963312995208,"score_gpt":0.31866664947925455,"score_spread":0.29810868616625935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042170054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82517785,0.0015376232,0.00006182306,0.113859355,0.0016760386,0.00034146922,0.0000073854594,0.000005069895,0.057333406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981111,0.00007590176,0.0000121024805,0.0004332278,0.0004290163,0.0000021762512,5.601348e-7,0.0000029169894,0.0009329671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982317,0.00042749054,0.00039921535,0.00007682153,0.00067778333,0.00018697823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847066,0.00066376856,0.000305877,0.00013095801,0.00031998698,0.00010872803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025284244,0.00008378803,0.00012235015,0.000060845592,0.001160129,0.00023454883,0.0010084056,0.000031942356,0.00016335837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112354195,0.000031754294,0.000089899564,0.000061511055,0.00067011424,0.00024882815,0.000019274938,0.00021646573,0.000005092914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049884882,0.000011422495,0.00018267425,5.8582543e-7,0.000047511872,0.000016292948,0.011539634,0.000007882519,0.000005009252,0.9799999,0.008019513,0.00011971579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005475696,0.000030071375,0.0035296544,0.000092090995,0.000035008452,0.000115340175,0.0008584483,0.000033616547,0.00007903758,0.8050717,0.18955044,0.000057007965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22398365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72636706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5023834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016658651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033036259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8922891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042851964","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0035","title":"Constitutional rights in the balance: Modern exclusionary rules and the toleration of police lawlessness in the search for truth","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawlessness; Discretion; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Law; Balance (ability); Human rights; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.04441986453828719,"score_gpt":0.2839734639625264,"score_spread":0.23955359942423918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042851964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8555313,0.00062690955,0.0011941047,0.002796833,0.000118864875,0.0003349237,0.000019412919,0.0000026566115,0.13937505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995201,0.00014566383,0.00021987781,0.000041946423,0.000048356622,2.0455053e-7,6.6552803e-7,4.4186993e-7,0.000022713533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991709,0.0003362405,0.00008752164,0.000055220753,0.00025290487,0.00009719256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937165,0.00040141123,0.00006245317,0.00005805303,0.000086311535,0.000020114794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014514383,0.000035652996,0.000084760286,0.000008405077,0.0008740545,0.00001743345,0.00034791793,0.00003203469,0.00006137676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013302337,0.000019977999,0.000038976144,0.00002397441,0.0013804054,0.0003500724,0.000027363854,0.00008284909,2.127337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023556448,0.000038608632,0.0006511189,0.0000052197283,0.0000036933811,0.000002929204,0.1383717,0.000013760773,0.000004464973,0.8603787,0.000043068463,0.00025118838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005821201,0.00026647453,0.11650473,0.00037487914,0.00013047527,0.00010300288,0.6767231,0.0027162537,0.00005902965,0.15544169,0.041567862,0.0002912976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27573404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.486358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057913465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007483495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7290889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043119841","doi":"10.7202/042675ar","title":"Le recours au Comité des droits de l'homme de l'O.N.U. : une illusion?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitution; Charter; International human rights law; Right to property; Cultural rights","score_opus":0.015574079372907798,"score_gpt":0.2824062114197666,"score_spread":0.2668321320468588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043119841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89845216,0.00020523556,0.002772644,0.016321331,0.00009080415,0.000115134666,0.000004835862,0.00012217315,0.08191567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327726,0.00017403251,0.0039299866,0.0014035909,0.00043930195,0.000013505141,0.000002994779,0.000020890371,0.010738434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982738,0.00018484629,0.00018851971,0.00023997198,0.00027633368,0.00083653827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989957,0.00028621047,0.000074217,0.00019742263,0.000059701033,0.0003867425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012602096,0.00013243506,0.00018067945,0.00006235925,0.0014225469,0.00009628968,0.00044762573,0.0002753453,0.00011694276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004416439,0.00015520173,0.00011698821,0.00030044018,0.0010440086,0.00027789595,0.00004229052,0.00035171353,0.00008425546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007228533,0.0001406594,0.010437987,0.000040181603,0.00003274797,0.00007925512,0.10764965,0.00030657736,0.0015798875,0.77940464,0.0051701507,0.09508599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007668719,0.00012795342,0.039444946,0.00021292445,0.0001256299,0.00009556803,0.04334124,0.00053165446,0.0021068957,0.3758719,0.5365583,0.000816119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034556724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07698998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53138816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021625776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008197046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044105069","doi":"10.3917/riges.303.0059","title":"La responsabilité civile des vérificateurs après la tempête financière : point de mire sur une réforme canadienne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04452409577872107,"score_gpt":0.2813241461053062,"score_spread":0.23680005032658513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044105069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8790817,0.0028103322,0.000099375946,0.10868709,0.0003371062,0.00018083196,0.000026658323,0.000073766125,0.008703092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671381,0.0011418,0.00084051205,0.0001562446,0.00034711589,0.000026833093,0.000007066717,0.000019891115,0.030322421],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974167,0.00083452574,0.0003119489,0.000376344,0.00024069041,0.00081980205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982213,0.0009225883,0.00011167879,0.00025959036,0.00014501206,0.0003398396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002977036,0.00020357878,0.00020905446,0.00006802963,0.0005940951,0.00009765076,0.00027731492,0.00036160168,0.00029192975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016037292,0.0002179783,0.00011355276,0.0005708365,0.0011469855,0.0006649095,0.000038267845,0.0003567312,0.0002650975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021371622,0.00030108518,0.008846289,0.00027344684,0.0000188388,0.000112990914,0.05471056,0.00075361284,0.0014273841,0.13871042,0.015307495,0.7793242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017394767,0.00011134027,0.17274189,0.00053761917,0.00006149037,0.000080258615,0.0053279335,0.00035723313,0.00019682596,0.0050601442,0.81507427,0.00027704882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20436142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5251476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7997668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001047697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006177116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88888973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044152050","doi":"10.7202/042391ar","title":"La connaissance judiciaire des actes réglementaires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Legislature; Statutory interpretation; State (computer science); Supreme court; Position (finance); Judicial review; Judicial interpretation; Business","score_opus":0.025447904117276897,"score_gpt":0.3144374386135144,"score_spread":0.28898953449623754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044152050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88587606,0.0008816807,0.00057606236,0.004340396,0.000058688907,0.00009067219,0.0000039861134,0.0001197945,0.10805265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993116,0.00034334784,0.0010964188,0.0007900076,0.00028513177,0.000011994149,0.0000016950399,0.000009932293,0.0043454547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896896,0.0001252372,0.00012423926,0.00016681082,0.00023149305,0.00038326127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993917,0.0002552899,0.000048313672,0.00011510386,0.00004563172,0.00014400925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058497704,0.0000875586,0.000110690315,0.00003402381,0.00076830806,0.000105954765,0.0002686316,0.00013803529,0.00035141144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035182387,0.00009509382,0.00006347479,0.00013843842,0.0016166646,0.00033869944,0.000019851752,0.00019844137,0.00008115392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036806323,0.000067691675,0.018490609,0.000038436978,0.000028237811,0.000043572883,0.0637445,0.000024506868,0.000782038,0.52221936,0.011060404,0.38346383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021093254,0.000041457854,0.026659863,0.00011643637,0.00004016553,0.000010233308,0.018848157,0.000026529211,0.0015683793,0.055534177,0.8966611,0.0002825533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002808467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011178077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056172896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000874418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62376297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044354767","doi":"10.7202/042777ar","title":"Ce qui est abusif au sens de l'article 8 de la Charte canadienne lors de la recherche de preuves","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Supreme court; Charter; Search and seizure; Legislation; Section (typography); Humanities; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.057091189295126896,"score_gpt":0.3399804534344192,"score_spread":0.2828892641392923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044354767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688114,0.00014729843,0.0015510094,0.0042236415,0.00004297772,0.00010574133,0.000007256697,0.00010366858,0.025007015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856166,0.00023871334,0.007071186,0.0010418027,0.00045426105,0.000018586703,0.000001390463,0.000023807763,0.005533629],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969269,0.0012996867,0.00016927689,0.00025022653,0.0001783173,0.0011755809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997193,0.0018870349,0.000064513304,0.00020640937,0.000039334947,0.00060971035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054609966,0.0001419778,0.00016045685,0.00005244506,0.0005854108,0.00014845325,0.000372972,0.00055841525,0.00011273091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025116298,0.00016309437,0.00008504622,0.000244428,0.0011081798,0.0002149979,0.00002759898,0.00072224374,0.0000382297],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009746061,0.0001674604,0.057963274,0.00007752236,0.00006467408,0.00035037135,0.7677935,0.0014633961,0.024636965,0.095469825,0.004087807,0.047827754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012403572,0.00022248345,0.14994149,0.00036831753,0.00042860862,0.00052229344,0.21669029,0.0063431934,0.032129873,0.1422612,0.44819796,0.0016539525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1701518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3383662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55110323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006931361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014111593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046543401","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2010.13.3.515","title":"The Rule Against Admitting Exculpatory Statements of Accused Persons: A Shiny Coin That has Lost its Currency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Innocence; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.17075454377666324,"score_gpt":0.41894143163557107,"score_spread":0.24818688785890783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046543401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2680643,0.46032426,0.000068812566,0.054419436,0.0046640374,0.0046673976,0.00012026461,0.00028143456,0.20739007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126218,0.0802368,0.00048369486,0.003385455,0.00056251267,0.000055634857,0.000012212448,0.000038287384,0.002603632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714226,0.00035079897,0.00060518907,0.00037623383,0.00092517014,0.00060035364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979924,0.0004997476,0.000457604,0.0004750236,0.00022324135,0.00035198493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024673268,0.0002487298,0.0004602438,0.000027254235,0.0012612635,0.00021027424,0.00095294765,0.000101635786,0.0006760907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011388892,0.00018153923,0.00026203037,0.00023720873,0.0006756715,0.00069983257,0.00012982874,0.00046802434,0.00028522994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009577838,0.0003470734,0.0011927574,0.009380716,0.000105621955,0.0000579308,0.023944236,4.4067124e-7,0.0021542136,0.47023067,0.07488605,0.4176045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016602778,0.00004936147,0.00018327445,0.0033754439,0.00021629907,0.000003232152,0.0016522717,0.0000033635108,0.00033160593,0.00033114522,0.9934598,0.00022814854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035565766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9185738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006357519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007227798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97007465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047125366","doi":"10.7202/045087ar","title":"De Dunsmuir à Khosa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03396127961799788,"score_gpt":0.3236435114768137,"score_spread":0.2896822318588158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047125366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07630777,0.0019191767,0.00008513295,0.06339212,0.013462984,0.000091931375,0.000030511086,0.00004475154,0.84466565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797538,0.0007808217,0.0020509833,0.0012990538,0.0037108173,0.0000018243404,4.2720302e-7,0.00001955512,0.012382752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788713,0.00024612172,0.0003290279,0.00019588186,0.00051472586,0.000827084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998586,0.0001830004,0.00017531357,0.00018045721,0.00018185849,0.0006933892],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018654416,0.00017033971,0.00020223048,0.000033564433,0.006530996,0.00027641188,0.0005168187,0.0002731613,0.0065125935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022233797,0.0001642689,0.0002185893,0.00019975421,0.0009270465,0.0007333319,0.00006222458,0.0013885598,0.0008471815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014407714,0.00008544186,0.000261907,0.000015757818,0.000021008289,0.00024725546,0.0011999399,0.000007172006,0.0005823031,0.94350034,0.0060294364,0.04803503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015454485,0.00007288484,0.00037851516,0.00009072348,0.00006913505,0.0011379182,0.0011921109,0.000032395994,0.0005030343,0.016238183,0.9799165,0.0002140572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013886034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11999092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001552052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006326497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047437190","doi":"10.7202/043164ar","title":"Recent Trends in Criminal Law Reform","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Openness to experience; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminal procedure; Judicial reform; Law; Law reform; Dispute resolution; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.028522203600407126,"score_gpt":0.3119152222262939,"score_spread":0.2833930186258868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047437190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4358541,0.00034203878,0.000043110544,0.010812563,0.00009572048,0.00004330061,0.000002047307,0.000053456635,0.5527536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828571,0.0004750386,0.00065516646,0.0014008512,0.0002816639,0.000008075089,0.000003841885,0.000007771138,0.0143105015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895746,0.000061401035,0.00015234482,0.00017164738,0.00024597882,0.00041118602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963003,0.000042725074,0.000035426205,0.00012841361,0.000026447195,0.00013694458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057458004,0.000077519624,0.00011115053,0.00008189686,0.00028850193,0.00005112716,0.0002292376,0.00015250174,0.0005720223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052239324,0.000081019636,0.000053247262,0.0002701049,0.00040701206,0.00022944115,0.000015432315,0.00025793558,0.000066172164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028200011,0.00003533466,0.0001902244,0.000004802461,0.0000026734867,0.000021282405,0.025173666,0.000010409289,0.000037173937,0.5568924,0.0007741943,0.41682965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015413134,0.00003258891,0.0033946813,0.00002254343,0.000016335287,0.0000055263677,0.007814399,0.000030828203,0.00021412314,0.0057771844,0.98238474,0.00015289371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015757697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14556621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026667248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004886053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99079645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049432150","doi":"10.7202/050745ar","title":"Is Picketing a Crime?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Picketing; Contempt; Political science; Law; Legislation; Criminal law; Trespass; Charter","score_opus":0.08219316870775212,"score_gpt":0.3518721676520014,"score_spread":0.2696789989442493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049432150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18602061,0.00071413536,0.000497207,0.092670806,0.0001691177,0.00016741565,0.000004256172,0.00015304476,0.7196034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96646094,0.00007102674,0.0007566371,0.0003251339,0.0004909947,0.000004594523,0.0000013066259,0.0000048122533,0.03188457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999285,0.000061575054,0.0001366009,0.00012189875,0.00020516825,0.00018978359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950427,0.00020596631,0.000043506298,0.000110131645,0.00005792724,0.00007822259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034122416,0.00005312262,0.000057255333,0.000047762805,0.0008027256,0.000057449735,0.0001275807,0.00014014273,0.0019858803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042958153,0.000055390396,0.000038934442,0.00025969782,0.0001285318,0.0002590796,0.00002147959,0.00019019144,0.0008620489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008183484,0.00008951076,0.028847981,0.0000013759727,0.0000230223,0.0000035909145,0.051164553,0.00027465314,0.000053768526,0.2792816,0.4389408,0.20131098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004928157,0.000005466393,0.0017992414,0.000021125732,0.000013187564,7.098569e-7,0.005635968,0.00009461682,0.00013863025,0.00048144758,0.99168366,0.00007663755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080646225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026234658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78044033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078405064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018720014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050071912","doi":"10.7202/043493ar","title":"Comportement criminel et régimes étatiques d'indemnisation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03602416594752122,"score_gpt":0.3283033278111929,"score_spread":0.2922791618636717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050071912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.778774,0.0061450484,0.014336044,0.12489411,0.00081723224,0.00032986028,0.000022545377,0.00014546375,0.07453567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93958664,0.001914948,0.007868187,0.0050971494,0.00091022643,0.000019918056,0.000017766013,0.000021374997,0.04456378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800223,0.00031245803,0.00036072667,0.00031668582,0.0004598433,0.0005480739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999016,0.0002943724,0.00016953655,0.00019154228,0.00008759068,0.000240948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011703868,0.00019762313,0.00023227051,0.00006142974,0.0004887711,0.00013805278,0.0002850581,0.0003269521,0.00079874793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015735734,0.00023378494,0.0001411786,0.0001835414,0.0009998855,0.0005967718,0.00003050072,0.00041783619,0.00028057655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022151386,0.00015526163,0.0018406516,0.00008851368,0.00004143439,0.00002178925,0.06227949,0.00025427475,0.00019265198,0.7834323,0.021011462,0.13066004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028952217,0.00012821433,0.010349446,0.00021472685,0.00018564692,0.000015071224,0.015231153,0.0013277214,0.0009979281,0.061631598,0.9091714,0.0004575451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005815488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055227154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014542133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020998027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053793258","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.103.36495","title":"Alcohol Provider Liability in Canada and the United Kingdom: Legal and Cultural Influences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Duty to protect; Law; Harm; Paternalism; Legal liability; Political science","score_opus":0.07425810013670905,"score_gpt":0.36264346837789413,"score_spread":0.2883853682411851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053793258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79748327,0.085144386,2.7963827e-7,0.1050291,0.00013544584,0.0010091551,0.0000026114521,0.000022822689,0.011172946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798433,0.014090804,0.000021148433,0.0058508026,0.000031258918,0.000029768773,0.000001268898,0.000002861319,0.0001287789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987448,0.00037170504,0.00026629967,0.00017552997,0.00023008208,0.00021161784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993035,0.00031675713,0.000075602984,0.00016075216,0.000051582476,0.00009176436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010039282,0.00010126336,0.000283118,0.000015138585,0.000379102,0.000111559544,0.0002151299,0.000017560327,0.000027397506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022212959,0.000059552873,0.000029762186,0.00045181726,0.0009427271,0.00030128015,0.00007390116,0.00018118402,0.000001719065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018386636,0.000012733712,0.027591608,0.00078020664,0.000007018216,0.000014220852,0.0008285442,0.000008232223,0.0000011313883,0.96540636,0.0008480104,0.004483575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035674512,0.000006748627,0.0128407525,0.00258788,0.00004214124,0.000003991462,0.00028992773,0.0000028323868,0.0000037126094,0.004246485,0.97948015,0.00013865883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001777737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037053702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34735173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054332008","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.419","title":"Réflexions sur la nomination des juges","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06543552130492349,"score_gpt":0.30749652842365005,"score_spread":0.24206100711872658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054332008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08833264,0.00525584,0.001880694,0.115240276,0.0017435738,0.00038280775,0.000023365092,0.00021034198,0.78693044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94900763,0.0022421067,0.0024969685,0.0038207355,0.0004637402,0.000055175056,0.0000058391493,0.000025921865,0.041881908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977296,0.0008357539,0.0002911294,0.00033367463,0.00027385424,0.0005359813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982754,0.00059547677,0.0001361675,0.00023929248,0.00047204323,0.00028163186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020657894,0.00019367639,0.0001988476,0.000102851714,0.00046033424,0.00017865717,0.00043567482,0.0004877668,0.0017752525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013634028,0.00020793229,0.0001333393,0.00046501344,0.0013520626,0.002112804,0.00009295221,0.00043075468,0.00037115978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017767386,0.0001930642,0.0012202121,0.00008495853,0.000016275075,0.00002327789,0.01755865,0.0000010986728,0.00005221468,0.9545376,0.008681442,0.01761346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010129202,0.00010233569,0.009578441,0.00022176113,0.00004957038,0.00002485263,0.0016571904,0.0000388482,0.0007477218,0.27369007,0.71348965,0.00029826933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030799886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02110355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.860675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025509903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007002538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055128151","doi":"10.1108/13590790310808673","title":"Expectations of privacy and market abuse ‐ support for the Financial Services and Markets Act and the Canadian approach","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial services; Financial regulation; Financial market; Charter; Statutory law; Consumer Protection Act; Business; Tribunal; Market manipulation; Broker-dealer; Human rights; Finance; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030964251006508257,"score_gpt":0.2813038735430223,"score_spread":0.25033962253651404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055128151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531754,0.010879787,0.0001690323,0.014265144,0.00048451524,0.00087199546,0.000034392415,0.000007358462,0.020112328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676555,0.0016385537,0.00063370087,0.00026094672,0.0003357719,0.000008152248,3.0056336e-7,0.000005325041,0.00035169098],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902964,0.00011358839,0.0002877276,0.00010511268,0.00024228312,0.00022164779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987187,0.00060713344,0.00024481048,0.00009198028,0.00019130818,0.00014608119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001356531,0.00008982666,0.00021622208,0.00006879905,0.00094559195,0.00012289156,0.00024452864,0.00007707825,0.000052007483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007184925,0.000055185934,0.000069389615,0.000116982825,0.0005453665,0.00030142406,0.000023511688,0.00014727612,3.5951257e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029066335,0.00028678394,0.036808386,0.00070431974,0.00015065003,0.00006420198,0.594513,0.000006098699,0.00007302381,0.1306597,0.07393134,0.15989587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023115394,0.00029780928,0.6483079,0.00013045258,0.00037131878,0.00015028735,0.011610338,0.0007015441,0.000025477944,0.005975898,0.329834,0.0002833852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013999528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078696124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61149955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003604771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029269917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99256635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056126759","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2009.38.1.0181","title":"Relocating Officially Induced Error of Law: Fitting the Remedy to the Wrong","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Fisheries, New Zealand","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Law; Jurisdiction; Ignorance; Supreme court; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Criminal law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13175978513366343,"score_gpt":0.4190385052998113,"score_spread":0.28727872016614786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056126759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010864067,0.074384846,0.000016279597,0.3881108,0.00042950583,0.0017496942,0.0000019173242,0.00009787287,0.52434504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752509,0.002510671,0.00016872416,0.02101326,0.00026974897,0.000014702226,8.6786275e-7,0.000007977759,0.0007631544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792403,0.00061647984,0.00051290944,0.0001918703,0.00044373746,0.00031098412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984048,0.000584439,0.00024752028,0.000549947,0.0001272141,0.000086062064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033538914,0.00012345589,0.00034031319,0.000015806316,0.0011212383,0.000073947725,0.0009691892,0.00003212137,0.00007460342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005476207,0.000071324546,0.0001354402,0.0006246356,0.00020817574,0.00013687526,0.00010098316,0.00026714336,0.000055367287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042148663,0.000021382511,0.0000365256,0.00016745135,0.0000049310174,0.0000016031807,0.0018541347,0.000004661586,0.00006383872,0.9071705,0.0055121738,0.08515864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000306576,0.00003882514,0.0004654716,0.0055825138,0.00006707385,0.0000011317566,0.00037472896,0.000005172131,0.000118725155,0.001953708,0.99123514,0.00012684667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005819477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13133658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98572296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038773396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009005952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8845143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056985910","doi":"10.7202/043086ar","title":"Que signifie l'expression « les corps politiques et les corporations » utilisée à l'article 33 du Code de procédure civile du Québec?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03739340103296268,"score_gpt":0.29966129218487564,"score_spread":0.26226789115191296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056985910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8523228,0.005516824,0.011730479,0.113057196,0.0002258651,0.00043768628,0.00015018221,0.00025586353,0.0163031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746107,0.0019535264,0.0023829348,0.0017716517,0.001052425,0.00006997609,0.00002267255,0.00004608692,0.018090017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996938,0.00072271144,0.00047139588,0.00049748854,0.0004580334,0.00091236795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978999,0.0007699656,0.00027374655,0.00031839954,0.00024298878,0.00049501925],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00111997,0.00032288113,0.000339272,0.00007957142,0.0015930036,0.00027130113,0.0005203483,0.0007034563,0.0009846251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077279744,0.0003535841,0.00020830856,0.00032291593,0.0021192126,0.00088123034,0.00008236913,0.00089092355,0.00015827287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010840491,0.00045615365,0.040602844,0.0001835155,0.000044357024,0.00009326211,0.0668842,0.00078163063,0.009950845,0.80708194,0.058471728,0.01534114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006235714,0.00028842574,0.017704528,0.00086625444,0.00027618,0.00012888924,0.034355693,0.003917537,0.024599083,0.041886542,0.87432164,0.0010316425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19780003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46636942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018179179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014241677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057004394","doi":"10.7202/043949ar","title":"La Loi sur l’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels du Québec : lorsque le temps court contre les victimes de violence sexuelle intrafamiliale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013401634964813622,"score_gpt":0.24279831521288564,"score_spread":0.22939668024807203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057004394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94914955,0.010823897,0.0065491637,0.018978043,0.0003017703,0.00034043915,0.00003908445,0.00020973959,0.013608318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731154,0.0056533203,0.0020425832,0.00090132444,0.00093125325,0.000040968403,0.000011290822,0.000058337107,0.017245512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964561,0.0007640267,0.00056746526,0.00061880384,0.00050627923,0.0010873632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966362,0.0020044595,0.00027831673,0.00032624594,0.00029995447,0.0004548009],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016220508,0.0004516732,0.00052034436,0.00012239405,0.001743314,0.0003347698,0.0006765341,0.0008473424,0.0006891198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012043979,0.0005216494,0.00025593417,0.0003715311,0.00442843,0.0012741243,0.0000783933,0.00080721924,0.00020572508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027012225,0.0008243095,0.07440354,0.00059546327,0.00024901205,0.00017514848,0.17205727,0.0043696966,0.0030041041,0.11031932,0.010698236,0.62303376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011493304,0.00027383037,0.028684696,0.0013285186,0.00054295216,0.00020847558,0.08122061,0.008482379,0.0073370934,0.020173566,0.8492124,0.0013861472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35749575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2891689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83851415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030538526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022033164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057183870","doi":"10.7202/043538ar","title":"La révision des règles spéciales d'administration de la preuve","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02636496158241898,"score_gpt":0.32574752364501014,"score_spread":0.2993825620625912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057183870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8943289,0.0045468793,0.005257176,0.007560658,0.00022014476,0.0001383407,0.00001516346,0.000080959886,0.08785176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96319544,0.0025594407,0.006375709,0.0003048762,0.0010189231,0.000010842034,0.0000059016847,0.000020811784,0.026508035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977802,0.00078556646,0.00025581033,0.00028856358,0.0003281073,0.0005617267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833894,0.0010679569,0.000112937734,0.00016433753,0.000056265853,0.00025957404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017206077,0.00018361698,0.00018868937,0.00005485061,0.0007506943,0.0002691324,0.00031327785,0.0007033267,0.000276531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063170237,0.00021481939,0.000142887,0.0002478735,0.003650294,0.000523935,0.00002977979,0.00051736756,0.00013536768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059689337,0.00016764925,0.0025408398,0.00012131934,0.000022898657,0.00008503925,0.04761172,0.00013314775,0.00070825213,0.56718713,0.0030419629,0.37832034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023089917,0.00017214876,0.012984432,0.0003960817,0.00014825125,0.00013447991,0.010197895,0.00048472476,0.0025861603,0.11764324,0.85462207,0.00039961925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021928716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006304084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020426447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041164298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057237494","doi":"10.7202/017309ar","title":"De la police au tribunal : formulation et cheminement des plaintes portées devant la Cour du Québec, Chambre criminelle et pénale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1994978769191604,"score_gpt":0.42084272755233465,"score_spread":0.22134485063317424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057237494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92152125,0.00046148925,0.000759014,0.019673785,0.00006868545,0.00017027397,0.0000076094807,0.00018640973,0.057151463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951254,0.0005843265,0.0015378615,0.0010545315,0.00031540226,0.00003354421,0.00001264697,0.000015678177,0.0013205834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828744,0.0002579691,0.00027905204,0.00027980967,0.00030718494,0.00058853853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982184,0.0011799702,0.00011800731,0.00018383942,0.00013455094,0.00016523177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016209679,0.00019011229,0.00020390272,0.00007540344,0.0005589478,0.00015597943,0.00034443685,0.00018187457,0.00033055176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013083032,0.00017227593,0.000106227286,0.000098863995,0.0005916637,0.00041259197,0.000114910064,0.00022093646,0.00007377421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041677,0.0011931125,0.062154464,0.00032676003,0.000129693,0.000111746755,0.34821972,0.0008757692,0.011334114,0.24025929,0.06086294,0.2741156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006646287,0.00015888752,0.09788215,0.00014859541,0.00015845656,0.00006819456,0.0352909,0.00035602288,0.01142507,0.0036990135,0.8496159,0.0005322249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13165627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11439089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7887529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064739346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012944248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90176916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057407474","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9035-7","title":"Strict Confidentiality: An Alternative to Pre’s “Limited Confidentiality” Doctrine","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Privilege (computing); Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.1493687211564676,"score_gpt":0.47922510962706605,"score_spread":0.32985638847059845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057407474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93429756,0.0005279416,0.024946934,0.032354947,0.0026760013,0.00034131866,0.000010456207,0.000048249367,0.0047966205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907519,0.0014535757,0.0006284563,0.0035306686,0.002748641,9.919561e-7,0.0000013879528,0.000014118875,0.0008702202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947882,0.0010867799,0.001162529,0.00024255205,0.002164262,0.0005556374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413365,0.0025318514,0.0008540172,0.00019568011,0.0015109678,0.00077381806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028903576,0.00016802011,0.00037703713,0.00031560878,0.00048848725,0.00015275329,0.0010765532,0.0006539647,0.00018072083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075647635,0.00015904821,0.00016429777,0.0005597023,0.00040974043,0.001050117,0.00009896763,0.0038353312,0.000026011368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027984113,0.00036119763,0.015702965,0.00016987958,0.00039056485,0.0004359037,0.5037791,0.00051812327,0.017012797,0.4207852,0.014496497,0.023549356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017346623,0.0013906403,0.029561786,0.0009575599,0.000528186,0.00022423832,0.08195405,0.000047467856,0.02095748,0.05022383,0.81142175,0.000998328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007449761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004788808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7969253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000273769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081224955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059544678","doi":"10.7202/044140ar","title":"Les étapes de la mobilisation citoyenne et de l’adoption de la loi contre les poursuites-baîllons","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Publics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.012977436322820531,"score_gpt":0.310937301493129,"score_spread":0.2979598651703084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059544678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537213,0.0015986406,0.008158523,0.0077297795,0.00036951492,0.00021605582,0.000037287704,0.0001276613,0.02804124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98194325,0.0013889627,0.0048090336,0.00059755304,0.0006400582,0.00003685091,0.0000171479,0.000038133152,0.010529026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661934,0.0014962506,0.00029239184,0.00037917818,0.0003508318,0.0008620167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543834,0.003651146,0.00018967704,0.00024202718,0.00010426716,0.00037456164],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043973173,0.00026648847,0.00027893396,0.00009898164,0.00093048386,0.0003830503,0.00044316638,0.0010419802,0.00035542596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021883124,0.00031142187,0.00021931742,0.0002780803,0.0033193112,0.00042695235,0.000041129373,0.0013765056,0.000040849027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084125604,0.00023878599,0.04797358,0.00014364049,0.000061366125,0.000104116625,0.05026756,0.00078915665,0.021857847,0.7866796,0.002032072,0.08976812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235863,0.00028712858,0.19865222,0.00061731244,0.0007526663,0.00049308746,0.05283909,0.0040363064,0.004472247,0.23650469,0.49877283,0.0013365606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035133783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027282242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55017495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001410053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065557385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059839979","doi":"10.7202/039343ar","title":"Les sanctions administratives de l’assurance-emploi : entre solidarité, assurance et répression","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02412077641497012,"score_gpt":0.3255428210238179,"score_spread":0.30142204460884775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059839979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428821,0.0029379015,0.007651467,0.03738955,0.00226071,0.0002961881,0.00015337247,0.0001640703,0.106264666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479816,0.0015383769,0.0029948133,0.0005842029,0.00079177716,0.0000390204,0.000009413137,0.000033054872,0.046027727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971809,0.00045931153,0.0003701905,0.00052204006,0.00047173823,0.0009958572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976337,0.0011569471,0.00022184946,0.00035771655,0.00013115552,0.00049861416],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096889044,0.0003201124,0.0003521304,0.00006730411,0.001525466,0.00027851833,0.00055104314,0.00080139434,0.0016397914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010019115,0.0003562457,0.00025722603,0.00037167143,0.0025115216,0.0006582862,0.00004657774,0.0016439214,0.00012347168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016222149,0.00050912227,0.04777427,0.00043480613,0.00013158322,0.00020588115,0.06904387,0.00022678828,0.013061159,0.7201186,0.018888505,0.1294432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004849619,0.00019030421,0.13363042,0.0007939192,0.00022593541,0.00012667867,0.013944264,0.0002804739,0.0041762926,0.06452749,0.78077006,0.00084920984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063765394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058911078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76188153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052440225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008987999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060872817","doi":"10.7202/1022313ar","title":"La relativité aquilienne en droit de la responsabilité civile — analyse comparée des systèmes germanique, canadien et québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018883796378657232,"score_gpt":0.30866635993821934,"score_spread":0.2897825635595621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060872817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.601924,0.0020649135,0.0002980527,0.004857233,0.00044773315,0.00013616058,0.000052364732,0.00005715044,0.39016238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936718,0.00084794004,0.0013460013,0.0004188867,0.0004654804,0.000009177674,0.0000019879726,0.000041370717,0.0031973778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98837006,0.008925034,0.0006640708,0.00040621104,0.00060041016,0.0010342004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930267,0.0051519144,0.00036243608,0.0003454496,0.00022075942,0.0008927769],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012527198,0.00033377795,0.0005673291,0.00012991429,0.0038758873,0.00029574084,0.0006872632,0.0004153559,0.00062365644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015917529,0.00033423374,0.00033933495,0.00048368511,0.002297961,0.000905487,0.00011841846,0.0012594567,0.00010151586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009974879,0.00017361203,0.0058035534,0.00009890652,0.00010820819,0.0003269281,0.0134574305,0.00030186237,0.00009086537,0.95633686,0.0009962021,0.022205811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033097618,0.0002420967,0.018524775,0.00066703197,0.00026961317,0.0014911595,0.005279337,0.0005076471,0.00012676643,0.04588763,0.9262323,0.0004407044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53258485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9360324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92523605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019228796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027270298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061777057","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.75","title":"Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: <i>Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial discretion; Criminal code; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Terrorism; Penal code; Code (set theory); Judicial activism; Criminal law; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08279000444014531,"score_gpt":0.33144560875058204,"score_spread":0.24865560431043673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061777057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587672,0.00085836457,0.0007540253,0.03862791,0.00044481244,0.00026693376,0.0000056700587,0.0000032001262,0.00027189346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869925,0.00016436221,0.000045526023,0.00048504423,0.0005644509,0.00000868374,5.1129666e-7,0.00000531072,0.000026862712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746215,0.00031193998,0.00049162866,0.00015531572,0.0014217551,0.00015722611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799514,0.0005244218,0.00062725466,0.00013162733,0.00067051133,0.000051043953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022948196,0.0001027009,0.00015354707,0.00006276739,0.00038305047,0.00009987576,0.0007215595,0.000049658993,0.000009568556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065311923,0.000057355886,0.000040163795,0.00020975697,0.0007601729,0.0009002747,0.0001093302,0.0003605306,3.3630351e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001058039,0.00034638244,0.68741035,0.00008975546,0.00021704737,0.000053872063,0.05831274,0.02121472,0.03100943,0.1412437,0.0049755094,0.054068428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053962873,0.00014837354,0.87961465,0.001300933,0.00021536899,0.00013463272,0.035970367,0.0019746372,0.004041961,0.07299607,0.0027826333,0.00028076125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62293804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.915563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29262495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039047358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017832911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37957287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062148457","doi":"10.7202/043178ar","title":"Les pouvoirs d'urgence et le partage des compétences au Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026555385334901177,"score_gpt":0.2819153873778359,"score_spread":0.25536000204293474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062148457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8719727,0.008393449,0.002538242,0.043869894,0.0008970845,0.00016214052,0.000054352964,0.000060661732,0.072051466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961127,0.0010955501,0.0028122475,0.0016001622,0.0006109782,0.00001318044,0.0000065834734,0.000019863692,0.03271444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973654,0.0003301079,0.00033501582,0.00040443087,0.00055441546,0.0010106374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985345,0.0005508419,0.00014134691,0.00022899358,0.00008579781,0.00045852872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087889045,0.0002502574,0.00029733617,0.000040301024,0.0016364907,0.00012539211,0.0006298196,0.00027383448,0.00059474126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002669325,0.00028797067,0.00013270798,0.00037246436,0.0030488719,0.0005196449,0.000050015493,0.0005209163,0.000064852764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021066662,0.000102768136,0.009711089,0.00015334362,0.00004613559,0.000116417854,0.038189873,0.0014992371,0.000113896815,0.7805852,0.012768287,0.15669267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015256488,0.000052642125,0.011046835,0.00027942774,0.00007404948,0.000029326648,0.031160083,0.00041005795,0.0004993888,0.0128107965,0.9429805,0.0005042722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98317975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93021226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003222197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026544908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435280","doi":"10.7202/043546ar","title":"Quelques réflexions sur l'ordre public dans le droit processuel québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020585579097319038,"score_gpt":0.2679840251846288,"score_spread":0.2473984460873098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062435280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6796601,0.016884377,0.00778367,0.17760517,0.000773693,0.00046266936,0.00008578988,0.0003804119,0.116364114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86303276,0.0018887866,0.0013460348,0.0033677067,0.0011739642,0.000048773076,0.000021957967,0.00005211667,0.12906787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964823,0.00031394136,0.00050409365,0.0006621671,0.0006784037,0.0013590881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980995,0.0002746849,0.00022536391,0.00045071365,0.0002639441,0.00068580575],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010458312,0.00036616976,0.00043902863,0.00014054858,0.0016068174,0.00039464785,0.0009996982,0.0007004623,0.0006201427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006264561,0.00045444956,0.00030528064,0.00091014325,0.0028796503,0.0017834571,0.0000836874,0.0008475988,0.00046420164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019631976,0.0002732613,0.0011594414,0.00015823018,0.000056521676,0.000044429333,0.040965393,0.000056470013,0.00014471533,0.85580426,0.0034569446,0.09786067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003121969,0.00012045991,0.0018584449,0.00022155755,0.0001498732,0.000059800834,0.033571452,0.0004740525,0.000541932,0.087587684,0.87439203,0.0007105347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2772339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5442062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8709351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027872643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018841454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062874933","doi":"10.1093/icon/1.4.745","title":"The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02086310994059187,"score_gpt":0.30752740761552744,"score_spread":0.28666429767493556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062874933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10345301,0.0011507934,0.00095956266,0.060540188,0.015961783,0.00021354503,0.00013796361,0.000014411948,0.8175687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883664,0.00014790254,0.0000976626,0.00035422732,0.00039463706,9.0523133e-7,0.0000011287315,0.0000021791682,0.00016474807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978167,0.00015731316,0.0004102446,0.00008110736,0.001381228,0.00015343097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772906,0.0006384089,0.00034642717,0.00007859307,0.0011046461,0.0001028513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010412439,0.00007745481,0.00013452105,0.000045254186,0.00038938283,0.00006266066,0.0005370769,0.00004360316,0.00015041654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008649638,0.0000495637,0.000108981716,0.00007462381,0.001746808,0.00021211275,0.000019265524,0.00019116452,0.000005010491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043099062,0.000046750232,0.00089410006,0.0000013407297,0.00006202979,0.000053778745,0.00015249838,0.00037665135,0.000037895203,0.99280715,0.0054052374,0.00011949798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027396026,0.000036364727,0.00040078344,0.00009144799,0.00001678421,0.00008913078,0.0005160875,0.0000085433685,0.00042840655,0.045722313,0.95233893,0.00007721383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1233891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22993574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025841265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026004815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8824483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063111682","doi":"10.7202/043703ar","title":"Le principe de précaution et la déférence judiciaire en droit administratif","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01321010353606324,"score_gpt":0.30241347126463053,"score_spread":0.2892033677285673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063111682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78284913,0.002220505,0.0080792345,0.046283655,0.00038841815,0.00028240232,0.0000268345,0.00014851119,0.15972129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405262,0.0011478363,0.0034799196,0.0016322942,0.0006687695,0.000027298558,0.000009431099,0.00002589984,0.052482337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972334,0.00065991253,0.00035666084,0.0004438037,0.00047115062,0.00083508954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852556,0.0005582794,0.00017192311,0.00027790217,0.000070155984,0.0003961728],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020571374,0.00023517014,0.00027272332,0.00005975848,0.00070354325,0.00019195346,0.0005262765,0.000668638,0.00024092392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005109717,0.0003126679,0.00017695737,0.0003584149,0.0016432581,0.0006568884,0.000055199955,0.00083768566,0.00023934593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033852113,0.00016119669,0.0010834665,0.000077587196,0.000025620191,0.000103724946,0.021318797,0.00020532466,0.00032887945,0.90211165,0.0015165033,0.07303339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038762868,0.00022399859,0.01922393,0.0004685874,0.00017035934,0.00020198584,0.008225327,0.0011615552,0.0013414376,0.09213919,0.8757806,0.0006754071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016153911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87426406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014438094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016170546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063398290","doi":"10.7202/042614ar","title":"Property Rights, Municipal Corporations and Judicial Review","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Commission; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032313444052459346,"score_gpt":0.29544131148331726,"score_spread":0.2631278674308579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063398290","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16950002,0.38058338,0.00078190805,0.23989339,0.0011193049,0.0011308914,0.000050591865,0.00013966417,0.20680083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6630864,0.110757634,0.0029159575,0.008815013,0.0021398247,0.000046123365,0.000016950698,0.00002496009,0.21219712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985283,0.00023487452,0.00027591374,0.00026451857,0.00027035162,0.0004260628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992504,0.00012302952,0.000115339084,0.0001883784,0.00006952617,0.00025332117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074272807,0.00014887421,0.00026099503,0.00002884262,0.00094457675,0.00007221851,0.0002344058,0.00023979203,0.00065906346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017946075,0.0001251027,0.000091435686,0.0002785304,0.0019511414,0.00039670282,0.00003380738,0.00040025558,0.00022014526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015810147,0.00009730051,0.00022729127,0.00050188956,0.000032188513,0.00003795466,0.014380419,0.0000109293305,0.000022490709,0.7572416,0.052440885,0.17499125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009917754,0.000055857246,0.000244883,0.0011351067,0.00021113169,0.000031718104,0.00048953027,0.00022799507,0.000015461539,0.022734491,0.9745413,0.00021332802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012446936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025055468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005374826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013826294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99412924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063433766","doi":"10.7202/1006430ar","title":"Renouveau doctrinal en droit de la prescription","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Medical prescription; Philosophy; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.0210364861292437,"score_gpt":0.27310969907533683,"score_spread":0.25207321294609314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063433766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6448844,0.0026430031,0.0059170895,0.0020344392,0.0009559234,0.00020984985,0.000014360402,0.00011544547,0.34322545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905395,0.0016370603,0.0028180394,0.0004387273,0.0006736081,0.000019631643,0.0000032127703,0.00001964848,0.08899511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748796,0.0007141864,0.00026691591,0.00035847997,0.00035769265,0.0008147747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988607,0.0003467572,0.00012231147,0.00025587593,0.000057072164,0.00035724748],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018364874,0.00019752073,0.00022670631,0.000074810814,0.00051808346,0.00011456208,0.0005224254,0.0006948279,0.0012072526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036553922,0.00024785657,0.00018086482,0.00029556232,0.0018626715,0.00046674735,0.000047100228,0.0007478875,0.00030059798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084124535,0.00013627498,0.003291917,0.00009836904,0.000038603488,0.00018751214,0.0946486,0.000008739755,0.00059868995,0.8567573,0.0036405004,0.04050939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034090228,0.00028525488,0.035306532,0.0002739261,0.00030110637,0.000173757,0.014220473,0.00017335413,0.000941286,0.36072332,0.5867087,0.0005513799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024672525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017125151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58306825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019202409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003035239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064347324","doi":"10.7202/1005846ar","title":"Le bijuridisme canadien à la croisée des chemins ? Réflexions sur l’incidence de l’article 8.1 de la Loi d’interprétation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03711378500389355,"score_gpt":0.296828824594426,"score_spread":0.25971503959053244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064347324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45252723,0.0011496368,0.00064303837,0.005738028,0.00049294106,0.00009131634,0.000033959484,0.000045021246,0.5392788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943477,0.00077436096,0.0023695657,0.000419012,0.00031248815,0.0000070171013,6.608189e-7,0.000027333339,0.0017418868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973535,0.00069364096,0.0003988486,0.00024907026,0.0003542259,0.000950714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810404,0.0005047871,0.00020970056,0.00017008444,0.00022911989,0.000782263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025150164,0.00020022206,0.00021745637,0.000055473323,0.0043512657,0.0002241373,0.0005127214,0.00022646954,0.0007266523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053959247,0.00021577581,0.00018424533,0.00029883828,0.0019135033,0.0012433971,0.00007539049,0.0005769009,0.00009836062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058360223,0.00024054693,0.0028461022,0.00003887462,0.000040735024,0.0005851931,0.01866218,0.0000461775,0.0011894254,0.96701247,0.00086055626,0.008419387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006423482,0.00030256604,0.017539151,0.00091579295,0.0002650222,0.0042601535,0.011114557,0.00039452215,0.018242255,0.14447859,0.80116916,0.00067588675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40919784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6106522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083199743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005525988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064674822","doi":"10.7202/1027456ar","title":"La responsabilité versant acteurs : vers une redécouverte, en droit canadien,de la notion d’imputabilité","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.010509105521225165,"score_gpt":0.2629681914218199,"score_spread":0.25245908590059474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064674822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86837023,0.00045343587,0.00044683155,0.014103072,0.0012339221,0.00034996893,0.000045628996,0.00012776742,0.11486911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98441035,0.0007148277,0.0005853071,0.0002856575,0.0009950916,0.00003193072,0.000010979175,0.00005505751,0.012910803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939634,0.0030062867,0.0005332606,0.0007641003,0.00047728303,0.0012556254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940286,0.0042155483,0.00021674846,0.0006895858,0.0001299258,0.00071956875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061438605,0.0002923777,0.0005201188,0.00013408798,0.00050679105,0.00017225232,0.00078727043,0.00074940105,0.0002832401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037517324,0.00045775622,0.00033316875,0.0008865166,0.0015027543,0.00053702283,0.00010656582,0.00079881895,0.00026874806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056324655,0.0005127405,0.01630009,0.0011036005,0.000126586,0.0005329706,0.074363805,0.0018060892,0.0017236794,0.61959344,0.0061514443,0.27722234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000876714,0.00055910123,0.061663758,0.0011140977,0.0004138596,0.00035602934,0.010115961,0.004918765,0.00022449355,0.11698268,0.8017105,0.0010640741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11733665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068338715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.795559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041520842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009146585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064988402","doi":"10.7202/043500ar","title":"Have the Politics of Rate Regulation Produced a Better No-Fault Regime for Ontario ?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Subsidy; Compromise; Compensation (psychology); Politics; Certainty; Tort; Business; Interest rate; Damages; Subrogation; Actuarial science; Economics; Public economics; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Political science; Market economy; Liability","score_opus":0.020944479956417718,"score_gpt":0.27788931857695803,"score_spread":0.2569448386205403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064988402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96703553,0.000033623106,0.0010535497,0.021749232,0.00009711984,0.0003654101,0.000004930131,0.000022065347,0.009638549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188824,0.000005012638,0.0017450766,0.0009613578,0.00052318996,0.000020608602,0.0000046837963,0.000007502613,0.07785016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992015,0.00006959799,0.00015085739,0.00014061866,0.00016962826,0.00026781159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933505,0.00020557277,0.00009112622,0.00017877252,0.00013418296,0.00005532325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071050116,0.00006429313,0.000100561476,0.000022582839,0.00041855988,0.000038199283,0.00018687478,0.00010497311,0.000056821467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003438376,0.0000541949,0.0000746519,0.000054813667,0.00038323065,0.0001308753,0.000010046667,0.00013128137,0.000013497006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021341768,0.00009612277,0.0066706464,0.00009822444,0.00007040461,0.000003174712,0.23118713,0.00026448307,0.0060654967,0.6986432,0.0351472,0.021540483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003147705,0.000086482934,0.012504572,0.000058485566,0.00009768459,0.000002658281,0.0033884873,0.00038118046,0.0077839848,0.07352366,0.901644,0.00021403257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02201498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09560552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8664968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063594163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017259724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066039189","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.219","title":"Introduction: The Youth Criminal Justice Act - A New Era in Canadian Juvenile Justice?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Juvenile delinquency; Law; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.09502680670693506,"score_gpt":0.320603496681848,"score_spread":0.22557668997491295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066039189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90801346,0.004102856,0.0009167472,0.07320147,0.003425829,0.00046176455,0.00006764832,0.000053327967,0.00975687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98412097,0.0019795012,0.0025157752,0.0060650124,0.00443291,0.000023211702,0.000019736488,0.00007657429,0.0007663299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198055,0.00117554,0.0013651301,0.00091644033,0.00037122783,0.004191138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99060243,0.0016341344,0.0007077592,0.00074244983,0.00084505684,0.0054681785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049652215,0.00074564404,0.0010278679,0.0014836764,0.0024809956,0.0005143164,0.0019650476,0.0010197801,0.00045278782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013988954,0.00073621364,0.00030229398,0.0005788831,0.002412407,0.000988861,0.00009755324,0.0031612318,0.000051894574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060866686,0.00014822716,0.00096725783,0.0031669033,0.00018684365,0.01298159,0.42569986,0.0052308156,0.00017906309,0.52445203,0.011465682,0.014913047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001834952,0.0010004322,0.019365741,0.0007253475,0.03558717,0.010930932,0.8221432,0.00008390893,0.00010657562,0.010092255,0.09683194,0.0012975492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83571386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5143598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051670736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039653346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068868265","doi":"10.7202/1006421ar","title":"The Effect of Alcohol on the Canadian Constitution ... Seriously","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Separation of powers; Political science; Dominion; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06841505137502493,"score_gpt":0.30564085008465974,"score_spread":0.2372257987096348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068868265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034409344,0.00006249745,0.0000013849093,0.0047023916,0.0005646909,0.000144235,0.0000052713453,0.000007545978,0.9601026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995046,0.00004426475,0.000008797085,0.00021075785,0.000101435595,0.0000031308034,9.4084754e-8,0.000002581321,0.00012433606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891376,0.0003504232,0.00013279448,0.00006154019,0.00028666257,0.00025479152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.00031478456,0.00008797412,0.00011165842,0.00007523074,0.00016068181],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021534935,0.0000598754,0.00007595104,0.000017822389,0.011056598,0.000067583394,0.00032155067,0.000045568748,0.0001769908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002737168,0.000029072578,0.000071611685,0.00007826429,0.0007658526,0.000108646214,0.000010875587,0.00021656383,0.000052417425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003461206,0.000003171701,0.000574112,0.000001420069,0.000011534537,0.000016221793,0.00052602286,0.0000017892203,0.000010206363,0.9956265,0.0007431042,0.0024513246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010660549,0.00022097722,0.00090994424,0.000047852463,0.000026172667,0.000037714504,0.0005757965,0.0000018403763,0.0017010206,0.0023104209,0.99400073,0.000060915405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66194046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99331605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013808651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006301089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99023086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069410744","doi":"10.7202/042688ar","title":"Quelques réflexions à propos du document de la C.R.D. traitant de l'homicide","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminology; Diminished responsibility; Criminalization; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.009001181274722665,"score_gpt":0.29225924377208995,"score_spread":0.2832580624973673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069410744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047975,0.00033049556,0.0049729766,0.02414708,0.00007715518,0.00023088488,0.000005463597,0.0001774924,0.065260984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857018,0.00044641463,0.0065844194,0.002427023,0.0004199025,0.000031796404,0.0000018417456,0.000015508926,0.004371315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.00029810282,0.00017719164,0.00020323803,0.00025410246,0.00057534134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924165,0.00025235242,0.00005863169,0.00014273336,0.000035602003,0.0002690476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013493933,0.000117220654,0.00014313303,0.000049446033,0.00060479785,0.00016504338,0.00032899782,0.00021701468,0.00024082657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032713244,0.00012156292,0.00010535478,0.00012537916,0.0007320487,0.00024794042,0.00002231761,0.00030404842,0.00006357288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004081553,0.00006838837,0.0019431402,0.000018168408,0.00001841153,0.00007566221,0.057233587,0.000119164455,0.0015380922,0.9144026,0.0030535862,0.021488365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048367825,0.00013185719,0.011801458,0.00015302034,0.00014300119,0.0001284357,0.02020639,0.0003129683,0.007738393,0.40264902,0.5556265,0.000625282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009757206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007020421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5525729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020469567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043808125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070685751","doi":"10.7202/042598ar","title":"An Evaluation of Canada's Dangerous Offender Legislation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0363514379358066,"score_gpt":0.30549191829958433,"score_spread":0.26914048036377775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070685751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9419436,0.0038314848,0.002285141,0.011120349,0.00065085286,0.0002202887,0.000019955965,0.000017584152,0.03991078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98722506,0.000094733594,0.00090077124,0.0003712115,0.0006193438,0.000007266094,0.000011174431,0.000010384256,0.010760075],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783987,0.00041846433,0.00022922507,0.0002016934,0.00094899145,0.00036176833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991144,0.00011939171,0.00014598209,0.00019274109,0.00025738345,0.00017009706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019418763,0.00010331467,0.0001446296,0.000036612655,0.00030071515,0.000031506097,0.00020575504,0.00021717176,0.0005307541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022985457,0.00012835697,0.00005037122,0.0002189875,0.00046659526,0.0004172964,0.000007419357,0.00019436858,0.000009604938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024511652,0.00009545356,0.001087652,0.0000426616,0.000032703585,0.000005277288,0.03237316,0.009981197,0.00051918783,0.13816029,0.0068635484,0.8108144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009587914,0.00027199477,0.038217146,0.00026623995,0.0009895983,0.000026457987,0.025756178,0.075330816,0.003135361,0.0408804,0.8132909,0.0008761253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6831373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9456972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80993825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033740047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014937384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8822905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071163636","doi":"10.7202/043499ar","title":"Comparer l'incomparable : les indemnités pour préjudice corporel en droit commun et dans la Loi sur l'assurance automobile","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02220570719202869,"score_gpt":0.29247877817813067,"score_spread":0.270273070986102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071163636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85205925,0.0063273893,0.0061400128,0.019185128,0.0006087389,0.00049926597,0.00011417696,0.00028016142,0.114785865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93155086,0.0016421974,0.0055635343,0.0015460671,0.0005875237,0.00005227217,0.000030190891,0.00007256414,0.058954787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483216,0.0015642669,0.00073603436,0.0006847337,0.0008611981,0.001321624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505025,0.00310383,0.00042622685,0.0006807878,0.00020978828,0.0005290865],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028231614,0.0005049741,0.0007976872,0.00012239328,0.0012682494,0.00030860727,0.0014453074,0.0009123423,0.0009968648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044888988,0.0006343842,0.0003420465,0.00068298867,0.0032331687,0.00093769125,0.00016696876,0.0019639477,0.0007821348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017096098,0.0011207855,0.039985918,0.0004293988,0.00024099878,0.00026587278,0.11361269,0.008694349,0.0006148276,0.73842335,0.043597244,0.05284361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012556914,0.00017821969,0.06454238,0.0011231333,0.0003696735,0.0002664461,0.03286516,0.0075788815,0.00071191596,0.04865741,0.84104615,0.0014049527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030237613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062879935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7974489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025231475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009139445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071775082","doi":"10.1353/dss.2006.0020","title":"New Orleans: A Right to Return?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dissent","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decadence; Tragedy (event); Jazz; Nothing; Taste; Romance; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art history; Media studies; History; Art; Law; Economic history; Sociology; Political science; Business; Literature; Archaeology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0180871052801209,"score_gpt":0.32482941867035287,"score_spread":0.30674231339023195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071775082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45712468,0.000392832,0.0011876575,0.06254339,0.0006608927,0.00029574492,0.0000024663047,0.0001479385,0.47764438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596228,0.000007385345,0.0005413903,0.00024176756,0.00055103406,0.000003564122,0.0000014597161,0.000003855148,0.039026756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934787,0.0000245044,0.00008369171,0.00012522208,0.00022344069,0.00019525617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999696,0.000031790245,0.000015641532,0.00010024306,0.000019734809,0.00013657245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012594492,0.000047981102,0.0000592334,0.000018823528,0.00018427623,0.00005838419,0.000139574,0.000025386125,0.00085571484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041188516,0.000041284773,0.000036879792,0.00014763484,0.000030332818,0.000071635666,0.00001632507,0.000032216725,0.00033235163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024968404,0.000059197922,0.005161636,0.000007458573,0.000004182125,0.000047309797,0.00875744,0.0000128486545,0.0017997574,0.39165536,0.583475,0.008994877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004047168,0.000015639367,0.006502582,0.00002363295,0.0000068878144,6.2317605e-7,0.0014352163,0.0000013973248,0.0012730894,0.0068456833,0.98376256,0.00009224189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027668342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02853611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045435336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000629967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072229252","doi":"10.7202/042903ar","title":"La suprématie législative et l'édiction d'une charte des droits britannique","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Charter; Discretion; Parliament; Democracy; State (computer science); Fundamental rights; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.016804810231648138,"score_gpt":0.3035003632217261,"score_spread":0.28669555299007793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072229252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7576663,0.00020843986,0.0072970157,0.0058610816,0.000075073796,0.00016301293,0.000008382577,0.00016239742,0.22855833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829299,0.00032119523,0.001839539,0.0006859048,0.00022913024,0.000020012048,0.0000054922148,0.000014951174,0.0139538655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987002,0.00028770347,0.00016476017,0.0002056638,0.0002730147,0.00036865522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992895,0.0002922855,0.000069288995,0.00012213532,0.00007121148,0.0001555651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009986765,0.00011080929,0.00014241575,0.000058572077,0.0005854863,0.000112493675,0.00019656103,0.00023183443,0.00013462703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002644695,0.00012681335,0.00008322001,0.00024531627,0.0008857164,0.0005794787,0.000017101682,0.00034775268,0.000087349974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036395177,0.00006462247,0.0019691547,0.000028655126,0.000027223583,0.000028502332,0.1539319,0.0000713372,0.0007400617,0.7460652,0.0031217812,0.09391517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043470805,0.00012745106,0.026499523,0.00022028353,0.000079762576,0.000048542435,0.02010891,0.00037330424,0.0017539036,0.2016197,0.7481724,0.0005615386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00498566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013803425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7450506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007109858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010728652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77026355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073000845","doi":"10.3917/risa.734.0583","title":"L'externalisation et la circulation transfrontalière des données : Défi de la protection des renseignements personnels dans le cadre du USA Patriot Act","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Patriot Act; Philosophy; Law; Terrorism","score_opus":0.12486225678482331,"score_gpt":0.3695824317176572,"score_spread":0.24472017493283388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073000845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8816846,0.0015485802,0.059803918,0.0016435788,0.0003675249,0.0003776438,0.000039421204,0.000045707126,0.054489046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98702973,0.0019898925,0.0055548945,0.000045225428,0.00046456564,0.000037403457,0.0000102563945,0.00001777904,0.0048502614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634564,0.0012276055,0.0005369365,0.00058506423,0.00075105595,0.0005537016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980572,0.0009661099,0.00034999228,0.00012035355,0.0002843287,0.00022200092],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004825356,0.00029259827,0.00023124939,0.00016129784,0.002468152,0.00070200744,0.0005581443,0.0002211255,0.00025747553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071325834,0.0003101544,0.0002067621,0.0006492869,0.009150621,0.0024960954,0.000041206316,0.00026817498,0.000017139362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013784316,0.0006196731,0.33234107,0.000443728,0.00009681152,0.00012825623,0.22559059,0.0012886149,0.016548004,0.35861155,0.000031028936,0.06416281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052671565,0.000770945,0.8216374,0.0023316948,0.00010492808,0.0006637548,0.0803782,0.003002183,0.0067908387,0.07437886,0.008755696,0.00065876846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018706335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060804892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48929635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094853895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082736235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073823109","doi":"10.7202/042587ar","title":"L'article 7 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés et les principes de justice fondamentale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Cooley's Anemia Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Humanities; Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.015575405766083607,"score_gpt":0.30552887588733485,"score_spread":0.2899534701212512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073823109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563179,0.00030992203,0.0015462766,0.005448704,0.00004752752,0.000113221555,0.000010209514,0.0001045751,0.03610163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845958,0.0003159844,0.0037974492,0.002113831,0.00016705733,0.0000221394,0.0000026395005,0.000020381734,0.008964732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982408,0.00038214537,0.00016088708,0.00022792748,0.0001974548,0.00079075125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998817,0.00052034913,0.000058684625,0.00014894067,0.000041122523,0.00041388668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018410914,0.0001286215,0.00013959728,0.000050390918,0.0007742341,0.0001736905,0.00030156918,0.00021156012,0.00015925088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005975006,0.00014608991,0.000073576586,0.00017448096,0.00089148624,0.00037466688,0.00003478541,0.00037307324,0.000037974885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051203406,0.00013450319,0.010427562,0.00008040563,0.00003321735,0.0000972679,0.18141742,0.0003996527,0.0067907684,0.7555999,0.0013860993,0.043581963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009827246,0.00019243943,0.106449015,0.00029307517,0.00039623902,0.00017778097,0.050803974,0.0013733109,0.011548974,0.09121835,0.7355808,0.0009833155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045049824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18181916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7341947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014659285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002995929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96130925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073964868","doi":"10.7202/1013007ar","title":"Qu’est-ce qu’un « délit d’opinion » ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028002657842859234,"score_gpt":0.2975306206767695,"score_spread":0.2695279628339103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073964868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7332091,0.07080711,0.004408493,0.021520032,0.008266636,0.0004003699,0.00004135944,0.00019809167,0.16114883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629196,0.0062131467,0.001099304,0.0012350753,0.0027953174,0.00001690417,0.000009694485,0.000031962616,0.02567901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727786,0.00032979975,0.00030790007,0.00033044184,0.0005027408,0.0012512585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984498,0.00039426275,0.00014602691,0.0003250738,0.000066584704,0.0006182483],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013560277,0.00024400602,0.00028136565,0.00005805962,0.0007954708,0.00011358701,0.00047443263,0.0005858578,0.001311016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036860348,0.00028483436,0.00021857006,0.00041961632,0.0014373816,0.00077736995,0.00006123037,0.00062505424,0.0011685821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027869051,0.00016349382,0.0068007205,0.00012698112,0.000039014372,0.000015280071,0.0414477,0.000011807025,0.00010719123,0.8232076,0.014385256,0.11366705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017525043,0.00009590232,0.008367821,0.00018062281,0.00010765113,0.000045200723,0.008317749,0.000052318486,0.0002488091,0.0253395,0.9566238,0.00044540927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007102283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038398657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011088813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016801213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073992155","doi":"10.7202/043506ar","title":"L'assurance des dommages matériels au Québec et l'indemnisation directe : un régime efficace mais encore mal compris","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01853242257965677,"score_gpt":0.274912258945123,"score_spread":0.25637983636546624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073992155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119102,0.0071883453,0.009053145,0.0400772,0.00051096804,0.00035328532,0.000044759105,0.00017644886,0.030685704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489494,0.00200228,0.0070029167,0.001064941,0.0008043954,0.000038093927,0.0000109768725,0.00004088374,0.04008611],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968574,0.00061378104,0.00044344724,0.0005340873,0.0005623697,0.0009889351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997731,0.0011726929,0.00023701508,0.00033962418,0.00012848072,0.00039118718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012953319,0.0003482621,0.0004133257,0.000076945245,0.0013464404,0.0002034318,0.00057050586,0.0005185089,0.00077142724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040337947,0.00040193152,0.00024312267,0.00046528943,0.0028419003,0.00076423964,0.00006363791,0.0006789967,0.00051444897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001738566,0.0004109903,0.027074805,0.00041748286,0.00013804308,0.00010309293,0.19615941,0.0014529023,0.0009885504,0.1738844,0.003866916,0.5953295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008742104,0.00018206862,0.15224363,0.00085264875,0.0003429242,0.00009409569,0.013912056,0.00096189976,0.0042286627,0.011247775,0.8139276,0.0011324345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17221576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43403596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8100607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034629502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007681348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076154020","doi":"10.7202/042412ar","title":"La preuve devant les tribunaux administratifs et quasi judiciaires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Statute; Natural justice; Tribunal; Law; Economic Justice; Administrative law; Criticism; Political science; Administration of justice; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.027478048736962583,"score_gpt":0.3294220962261428,"score_spread":0.30194404748918025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076154020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8636864,0.0006525364,0.0020165672,0.012175334,0.00010091626,0.00018833265,0.000015838621,0.00016758268,0.12099651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99042636,0.00030503958,0.0012760039,0.00075544434,0.0002719497,0.00001818175,0.0000056392782,0.000013972685,0.006927385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844265,0.00031641967,0.0002092069,0.00024279504,0.00036176987,0.0004271506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989268,0.0005641367,0.00008112008,0.00016993769,0.000056055294,0.00020192805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198163,0.00012842825,0.00017617535,0.00004778398,0.0005736844,0.0001573069,0.00033235067,0.00029703634,0.00016895421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007240505,0.00013367189,0.00010483709,0.00015493036,0.00077462394,0.00026758408,0.00002354566,0.00040896647,0.00007834292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007022972,0.00015225193,0.0022195969,0.000032619428,0.000029180708,0.0000793065,0.06265803,0.00002980317,0.00023016644,0.7746075,0.0062423535,0.15364899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025196027,0.00013950995,0.007374119,0.00009553914,0.000063850406,0.000023153243,0.019932905,0.000070948314,0.0008388651,0.02278081,0.94808316,0.00034515242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040351665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036006935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006852726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036189597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076244041","doi":"10.7202/1026917ar","title":"Un nouveau départ pour les dommages-intérêts punitifs","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.030028429148222374,"score_gpt":0.2790477683296691,"score_spread":0.24901933918144672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076244041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51401657,0.004127988,0.0026051998,0.108444326,0.0024070323,0.0003785465,0.000040572315,0.00019759325,0.36778218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9054841,0.0015782308,0.0017718187,0.00068715203,0.0036206548,0.000023126802,0.000011303801,0.000042877033,0.08678076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969834,0.0005887319,0.0004418098,0.000526092,0.0003800143,0.0010799174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980447,0.00059804396,0.00020631109,0.00051088136,0.00016096886,0.00047903805],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015869624,0.00024225851,0.00045478516,0.00007998083,0.000753074,0.00019325785,0.0007350011,0.00036968233,0.0022330969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006532432,0.00037081615,0.0003008997,0.00044548625,0.0006919042,0.00044680148,0.00012697987,0.0004769287,0.0028776512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003904978,0.00025609342,0.0075382977,0.00053761963,0.00006066736,0.0001853348,0.0074943285,0.00010293634,0.00055499765,0.7614683,0.033825133,0.18793723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039388036,0.0001698522,0.0073923045,0.0008913252,0.00023483903,0.00013090333,0.0028388945,0.0011749645,0.00066056085,0.14308584,0.8423184,0.0007082266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055358578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026472078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80849326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041057437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000197234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078039457","doi":"10.2307/825939","title":"Rethinking the Process/Substance Distinction: Baker V. Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Human rights; Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021476845913563917,"score_gpt":0.2455718296829147,"score_spread":0.22409498376935078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078039457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27136523,0.0016639527,0.00072644633,0.017562507,0.0009121231,0.000113032904,0.0000037862173,0.000025708021,0.70762724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966739,0.00040367333,0.00009509394,0.00011600529,0.00020047571,1.9239513e-8,2.0947998e-7,0.0000019274341,0.0025087101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991794,0.000085859334,0.00007452484,0.00007386785,0.0004189348,0.00016737562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945277,0.000067961126,0.000116031544,0.000077373676,0.00018917712,0.00009670474],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040212562,0.000046429057,0.00007324257,0.000002980114,0.0022896554,0.000032348824,0.0003507218,0.000030793497,0.001645274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030554627,0.00004011147,0.000041289553,0.000037808608,0.00026062614,0.0004897381,0.000013896528,0.00013038071,0.000001546191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078884803,0.0001600424,0.042495422,0.00006335762,0.00019351783,0.0012651175,0.33315855,0.0004216522,0.00007356201,0.49263892,0.09999341,0.028747631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117507574,0.000016764589,0.0040631336,0.000050681112,0.000027825852,0.000035287565,0.04486956,0.00001219527,0.0000049087002,0.0016850495,0.9490416,0.00007545631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97985023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000529593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035305237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081253217","doi":"10.7202/043179ar","title":"Le discours commercial en Floride : une psychothérapie-choc pour les professions au Canada et au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016688866071396084,"score_gpt":0.2984876701020092,"score_spread":0.28179880403061314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081253217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435395,0.0008175621,0.000817904,0.42003602,0.0014310819,0.0001994914,0.000062117644,0.00004029795,0.033056032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390562,0.0002851195,0.0005845248,0.0027743306,0.0030599213,0.000032986478,0.000014133162,0.000040592317,0.054152183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968667,0.0005520151,0.00041458616,0.00044850545,0.0005935361,0.0011246568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795324,0.00088218093,0.00018188065,0.00034321024,0.00008302967,0.00055647676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086136424,0.00031698172,0.00037965432,0.00006145391,0.002320825,0.00008298253,0.00071513734,0.0004399455,0.00026861366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036758036,0.00035134377,0.00019314878,0.00041989746,0.0014516521,0.0004795618,0.000060752616,0.0010640118,0.00006714868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009598315,0.00026770076,0.019486137,0.00009731284,0.000092102244,0.0000725732,0.11859052,0.00040858795,0.00009592075,0.6926422,0.06251025,0.10564068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049409166,0.000054415257,0.061663162,0.00038094388,0.00015733771,0.000019697522,0.066998616,0.000100106176,0.000112965485,0.00642156,0.8629951,0.0006020438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99890035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80048484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008736026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021135347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082909822","doi":"10.7202/042349ar","title":"The Supreme Court ofthe United States and the Law of Libel: A Review of Decided Cases","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"review","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Supreme court; Political science; Philosophy; Constitution; Law","score_opus":0.03784071130524521,"score_gpt":0.32733248264205306,"score_spread":0.28949177133680787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082909822","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013960407,0.98233145,0.000029506942,0.011652324,0.00014400859,0.0010389151,0.00011455051,0.000016126294,0.003277081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021883799,0.9922402,0.00012779945,0.001825965,0.00015641318,0.000055642304,0.000036585046,0.000029954994,0.003339071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558043,0.0018080452,0.0011120724,0.00031942048,0.00065494096,0.00052509963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882224,0.0097145,0.0010096418,0.00057016517,0.00031894704,0.00016434476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045455797,0.00036698385,0.0014909218,0.000053650776,0.0008559735,0.00007417665,0.001018619,0.00033860904,0.00014822184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019804335,0.00021074555,0.00058796053,0.0008271596,0.010980487,0.000128941,0.00011060585,0.0006657595,0.000013999757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005901964,0.000037978458,0.000008180013,0.027718402,0.00021872534,0.000017924052,0.0057502594,0.000003377251,3.7565684e-7,0.6470878,0.0027179637,0.31637996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018881906,0.000067326415,0.000006261832,0.04556881,0.0016745933,0.00008697881,0.0026911192,0.000020521398,0.000003421896,0.0073058857,0.94217044,0.00021580284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016149733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072956313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93945247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034498045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031910118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083567563","doi":"10.1186/s13063-015-0571-y","title":"Thanks to all those who reviewed for Trials in 2014","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trials","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Drug trial; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Clinical trial; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Pathology","score_opus":0.7142664024633065,"score_gpt":0.5827133590196666,"score_spread":0.13155304344363994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083567563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21299346,0.08744523,0.013265373,0.35388568,0.033316605,0.07849417,0.0005500006,0.000933079,0.21911642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8677969,0.017681457,0.016257953,0.021511903,0.020072546,0.0040555415,0.000049251474,0.00012874583,0.052445684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941711,0.0037129556,0.0011303587,0.0002564011,0.00036913046,0.00036006825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929986,0.0060108835,0.0003364257,0.000219621,0.00015511275,0.00027937494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09148638,0.00010994129,0.0012618797,0.000077176526,0.00008452527,0.00011033217,0.00033033028,0.00010917495,0.00020224672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09079455,0.000084225256,0.00025496227,0.0001851894,0.0000452809,0.00018490368,0.00003687375,0.000058192672,0.00033295059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097411976,0.000051405816,0.0001059702,0.000038723363,0.000020279722,0.0000032892601,0.018815355,0.0000073733345,0.00032578054,0.026363784,0.9098937,0.043400206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010094213,0.00012020061,0.000036117955,0.00020431411,0.000068017645,1.4551723e-7,0.0014735673,0.0000017216843,0.00039394395,0.0085050585,0.9880534,0.00013409994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031585293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035686044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65480345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009747016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028517208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.935506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084076798","doi":"10.7202/042698ar","title":"L'effectivité des décisions de justice en droit public interne [constitutionnel]","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Surrender; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Charter; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.025066667047781314,"score_gpt":0.3061945492865002,"score_spread":0.2811278822387189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084076798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84871435,0.0003356936,0.07958575,0.0041223825,0.00021723332,0.00017241071,0.0000064996716,0.00018700837,0.06665869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892759,0.00022259679,0.0037139058,0.000650885,0.00058834587,0.000027235015,0.000002704082,0.000012856107,0.005505621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983422,0.0002666793,0.00018097273,0.0002684722,0.00029213837,0.00064952875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846345,0.00084419333,0.000059644968,0.00019935495,0.00008055777,0.00035279262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014246077,0.00012986628,0.00016415674,0.000110433364,0.0011480785,0.00020523003,0.0004551931,0.0002457558,0.00029415573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002638725,0.00014538057,0.000120166325,0.00031733542,0.0014262169,0.0006071249,0.000049828268,0.00040612716,0.00021169671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024283105,0.00009717068,0.0044876602,0.000041229072,0.000027773047,0.000039923914,0.021549292,0.00012278554,0.0006000998,0.86395854,0.0016961071,0.10735512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009803555,0.00022490766,0.031717848,0.00042963133,0.0005846558,0.00024188889,0.039843526,0.0016737261,0.0020137557,0.2604418,0.66062725,0.0012206468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028181674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140227415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65893114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022342387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003355989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88302076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084711052","doi":"10.7202/043442ar","title":"L'émergence d'un principe de proportionnalité","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01862584459687153,"score_gpt":0.28623789661317056,"score_spread":0.267612052016299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084711052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9136233,0.008984433,0.010684599,0.041055933,0.00066104165,0.00023284732,0.000011058647,0.00010720863,0.024639588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88440585,0.0021591922,0.00723008,0.0017548281,0.001333775,0.000023493361,0.0000030424685,0.000021300279,0.103068456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976583,0.00024686503,0.0003543683,0.00036607406,0.0004624284,0.0009119542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989409,0.00011171114,0.00015696685,0.00026240962,0.000092790055,0.0004352304],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013565432,0.00019200234,0.00020658295,0.000045940305,0.00073967624,0.000085193715,0.00046911128,0.00041124676,0.002175021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035481405,0.00022616843,0.00017828296,0.00054037553,0.0014545963,0.0004200434,0.000041232557,0.0005296536,0.0006037149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025048055,0.00013638896,0.004776882,0.00008952035,0.00003365785,0.00007883977,0.027961163,0.00025925273,0.00039530947,0.6238275,0.0028318025,0.3395846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013923483,0.000072304596,0.008137157,0.00014318308,0.00012394506,0.000070026406,0.0031438346,0.000671728,0.0020592988,0.04428528,0.94075793,0.0003961047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004023336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028051091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9379261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018281918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037440783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084741629","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2001.tb00891.x","title":"The notwithstanding mechanism and public discussion: Lessons from the ignored practice of section 33 of the Charter","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Charter; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.060165392053980346,"score_gpt":0.3195389679592179,"score_spread":0.2593735759052375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084741629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090119325,0.0007959287,0.0003485635,0.90219533,0.0018481038,0.00035542907,0.00013532971,0.000007639599,0.0041943374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960971,0.0005032855,0.000030721378,0.00060032855,0.000571173,0.0000145265685,0.000012321295,0.000009105688,0.0021614367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794585,0.00061938085,0.00034531933,0.00023202728,0.00045433373,0.00040308788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788886,0.0007342798,0.0004074021,0.0003533986,0.00029689624,0.00031916713],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013608682,0.00013063317,0.00013322104,0.00003954058,0.0020181674,0.00045965172,0.00042754048,0.00016931012,0.00018411026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001656968,0.00006682701,0.00007480763,0.0006229808,0.0008729798,0.0010993613,0.00003850346,0.0002484233,0.0000034118968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021585027,0.000032388078,0.0018698558,0.000010219496,0.00003883111,0.0000041367816,0.004297892,1.9167703e-7,0.00009264524,0.9681056,0.004437417,0.021089202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001167152,0.00009609775,0.003848885,0.00008441058,0.000095296265,0.000032486,0.06029281,0.00020075751,0.00007565666,0.010746957,0.92429197,0.0001179829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085964285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9083581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95735866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002642898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002315096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085439619","doi":"10.1177/0964663910378434","title":"Between a Hunch and a Hard Place: Making Suspicion Reasonable at the Canadian Border","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Scrutiny; Objectivity (philosophy); Empirical research; Sociology; Law; Sketch; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.06945951445316405,"score_gpt":0.408517035797288,"score_spread":0.3390575213441239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085439619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8199268,0.0016330805,5.9801033e-7,0.11727275,0.00042909788,0.000246223,0.000012108334,0.00004389085,0.060435466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877925,0.00009955459,0.000024762194,0.00038113823,0.001241463,0.00002110643,0.0000012835434,0.00000803993,0.0104301805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879974,0.00010113609,0.000114833994,0.00019892096,0.00032792555,0.00045743564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993983,0.00022889602,0.000053188098,0.00007790914,0.0001424834,0.00009920314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009000844,0.00010613845,0.00017911916,0.000024085546,0.007013061,0.00019294547,0.00016648746,0.0001106245,0.00010251044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005550058,0.00008141555,0.000051853935,0.00016733656,0.0009973187,0.00018141503,0.00012067622,0.0002814124,0.000028601586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057408517,0.000021456683,0.14374797,0.0000671496,0.00029290878,0.000039766983,0.2926924,8.78395e-7,0.00011511065,0.26836964,0.2592057,0.0353896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007101588,0.000013789122,0.0511352,0.000014471727,0.000049050144,7.514859e-7,0.020406323,4.2268908e-7,0.000006705495,0.0012207421,0.9269611,0.0001203905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5493609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027421527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032096342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085666605","doi":"10.7202/1027168ar","title":"Transparence et imputabilité dans le processus de nomination des juges de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011393587174612191,"score_gpt":0.25544229449985206,"score_spread":0.24404870732523987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085666605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95104814,0.0011838173,0.00827398,0.013821949,0.000238301,0.00018196146,0.000038932467,0.000046718196,0.02516622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936314,0.00083161914,0.0012139889,0.00026212752,0.00044147848,0.000032026743,0.0000068634718,0.000022855993,0.0035576234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977277,0.0006752503,0.0002722982,0.0003471823,0.0002629165,0.0007146531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839145,0.0008543972,0.00011680536,0.0001913791,0.00012854638,0.0003174024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022060238,0.00015477031,0.0002530186,0.000030009263,0.0005149879,0.00012905216,0.0004632398,0.00019954238,0.00006112023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007765103,0.00023532688,0.00008806518,0.0002842838,0.00075918046,0.0004038706,0.000026376532,0.0002510046,0.000011938176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006637472,0.00036665404,0.17401844,0.0024906849,0.000045592085,0.00020973948,0.09473463,0.005629972,0.0022676052,0.66591614,0.002275921,0.051978253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011458128,0.0004568846,0.28093112,0.002119225,0.0005214969,0.0009118078,0.023792844,0.030673448,0.0061245365,0.3941167,0.25735962,0.0018464917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7958772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91288435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27179945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014165525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026921509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95963514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086013757","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.3.225","title":"Introduction: La Loi sur le système de justice pénale pour les adolescents - une nouvelle ère dans la justice canadienne applicable aux jeunes?","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07257036217329708,"score_gpt":0.2930160743327079,"score_spread":0.22044571215941078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086013757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8959409,0.013665296,0.008849527,0.06796837,0.0038507413,0.0005268949,0.00020924328,0.000093068666,0.008895937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754254,0.0065039718,0.004797024,0.0025191742,0.0050768545,0.00005436836,0.00002940287,0.00017442995,0.005419371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885043,0.0024075767,0.0018504028,0.001491939,0.00042683716,0.005318976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98763263,0.0027256936,0.0013428952,0.000931785,0.0017659637,0.0056010396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005179823,0.0012949384,0.0017408855,0.0010476983,0.003300054,0.00055514235,0.0022700634,0.0022089721,0.00032611514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009629819,0.0015449479,0.0005193363,0.00079519383,0.0057665007,0.0012465478,0.0002174124,0.0039161155,0.0000746348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009124615,0.0008380261,0.0012190202,0.023581445,0.0005962927,0.033010993,0.16564244,0.020177396,0.0017212144,0.71283835,0.021368954,0.018093422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028896625,0.0011514721,0.014051559,0.0031948835,0.048647866,0.047794748,0.6795526,0.00060844974,0.0003679549,0.012974743,0.18673858,0.0020274457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60886943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79701906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6998636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008655677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038711086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087253847","doi":"10.7202/029649ar","title":"Interprétation large et libérale et interprétation contextuelle : convergence ou divergence ?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0194806162149177,"score_gpt":0.3179889670871959,"score_spread":0.29850835087227817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087253847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59699094,0.007709982,0.23833548,0.08122395,0.004325113,0.0006749876,0.00012938485,0.00025672896,0.0703534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947052,0.0030914114,0.0010117675,0.0071404465,0.0001768437,0.000013216348,0.000035552133,0.000018283146,0.041460473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973831,0.00053007336,0.00043167672,0.00048062103,0.00046901748,0.00070549303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867475,0.00038014012,0.00024312457,0.00024511508,0.00017853429,0.00027831225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014472419,0.00026052733,0.00028797713,0.0000913067,0.0005096537,0.00017465327,0.000497137,0.0003730236,0.0011779447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057827326,0.0003177024,0.00019834546,0.00045992824,0.0006693191,0.0011856972,0.000053251177,0.00063940196,0.0005364137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096750184,0.00017385388,0.0019572792,0.000066591645,0.000026476253,0.000047739915,0.07443349,0.000105339604,0.0004891002,0.86472887,0.008595826,0.04927867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012163339,0.0011856208,0.04019128,0.0017496095,0.00031866046,0.00005255656,0.049025074,0.0102321915,0.0015344493,0.30979568,0.58308464,0.0016139083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026786283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005070552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5744888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075127085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002032596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087641293","doi":"10.7202/043432ar","title":"Le régime juridique applicable aux ouvrages de retenue des eaux au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018045387561738478,"score_gpt":0.27581001364200897,"score_spread":0.2577646260802705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087641293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8529412,0.010879401,0.0065924753,0.05477917,0.00033340414,0.00026118133,0.000023240571,0.0001436717,0.07404623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8581929,0.0013050254,0.0035450466,0.0014110018,0.0012353563,0.000045933935,0.000003334898,0.000038773316,0.1342226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974138,0.00025096725,0.00032245298,0.0004536866,0.00033181306,0.0012272506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985864,0.00034661786,0.00013091977,0.00033991967,0.000092846356,0.00050326233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011007293,0.00026048094,0.00033168987,0.000060788872,0.001779868,0.00015446037,0.00062846794,0.000575055,0.0002665933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035299236,0.00032168563,0.00022398475,0.00037260764,0.0031452442,0.0005328936,0.0000667588,0.00066523615,0.0005006475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056256118,0.00017379696,0.0032443516,0.00021063321,0.00006403691,0.00008626027,0.065393895,0.00078895886,0.0014608209,0.7688106,0.0107217375,0.14898868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021057024,0.0000835109,0.002307587,0.0001731082,0.000113823786,0.000055644843,0.0051953597,0.00028502624,0.0033244332,0.0402998,0.9475012,0.000449965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59652907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.661557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93677944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005266068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060657775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087746324","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0026","title":"Basic rights and substantive criminal law: The Incest Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Substantive law; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.04666004204695751,"score_gpt":0.25993476191343245,"score_spread":0.21327471986647495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087746324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57437915,0.00072886894,0.00006625101,0.00033264465,0.00017586703,0.000067952016,0.0000047270764,0.000010776353,0.4242338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878836,0.00020997575,0.00039135982,0.000045509343,0.000083121085,2.00013e-8,1.1147964e-7,0.0000019357444,0.0004796044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992605,0.00017301022,0.00008174304,0.00009700033,0.00021018668,0.00017760303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994279,0.00008778324,0.00010930597,0.00008443472,0.00014266654,0.00014790428],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048516152,0.00006453914,0.00010230472,0.000007702583,0.0025907727,0.00003746626,0.00026343996,0.000046790126,0.001185564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000105209265,0.000051184554,0.000058862544,0.000020336767,0.0012005841,0.0008087866,0.000049763792,0.00012160124,0.000004978957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012048896,0.000041959906,0.00029822072,0.0000060731686,0.000026689273,0.0016379452,0.13955298,1.6441794e-7,0.00001197069,0.85667455,0.00063289964,0.0009960852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008093771,0.0003868163,0.0050591757,0.00012919714,0.00046824696,0.0023861104,0.4744795,0.000010996469,0.00018061513,0.016714962,0.49902216,0.0003528595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7628325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9290948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83995956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012360424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047206002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089437330","doi":"10.1093/chinesejil/jms048","title":"Dealing with Compliance and Non-Compliance: The Case of the Landmine Convention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Obligation; Convention; Persuasion; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Control (management); Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05044417631193153,"score_gpt":0.3689975353635101,"score_spread":0.31855335905157856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089437330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97611374,0.000525466,0.00033074195,0.005805161,0.00062204286,0.00006322524,0.0000041162143,0.0000019675758,0.01653356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889195,0.00006040495,0.00020847743,0.00016151601,0.00044091526,6.9176116e-7,2.4434644e-7,0.0000030574322,0.00023272733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993884,0.000044442408,0.00019024193,0.0000398975,0.00024945466,0.00008756497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991432,0.0001625612,0.00029105373,0.00006272507,0.00028913733,0.000051343763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067672355,0.00005441797,0.00009664524,0.000015923193,0.00024761324,0.000035370478,0.0002338776,0.000018069697,0.000051628405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001087209,0.0000240073,0.00005438757,0.00006705839,0.00030546403,0.0003140079,0.000031892705,0.00011375685,0.0000014125442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028415187,0.00015230618,0.3044844,0.000068862915,0.00015532278,0.0001043409,0.00953306,0.000114971575,0.00115843,0.68104094,0.00038176196,0.002521449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039386535,0.00047222068,0.7805563,0.004323238,0.00040362924,0.017429419,0.016688917,0.0017210694,0.002289853,0.037329346,0.134133,0.00071431714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083508657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015805857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026071339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026493124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19044659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090170606","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009923","title":"Multidimensional Analysis as a Window into Activism Scholarship: Searching for Meaning with Sniffer Dogs","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.026944733604695032,"score_gpt":0.3102311204016027,"score_spread":0.2832863867969077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090170606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9457036,0.00402665,0.00080096896,0.04321291,0.0006730081,0.00036715876,0.000066806984,0.000010965059,0.0051379143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98438823,0.0004103253,0.0049514086,0.006318137,0.0007125284,0.000005301409,0.000011815531,0.00003518485,0.0031670665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968709,0.00031718952,0.00060465146,0.0004937615,0.0003536546,0.0013598716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946516,0.00073427666,0.0004958501,0.00022246448,0.0008307994,0.0030649975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031188629,0.0003773859,0.0008771351,0.00019105957,0.0023067186,0.00039460228,0.00043467936,0.0003853772,0.0001563126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040106082,0.00039326856,0.0008992038,0.0007667083,0.0011385464,0.0013375677,0.000020261188,0.0011202015,0.000003061334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007472647,0.000043543234,0.0011324729,0.00014058723,0.0014002199,0.00033638353,0.18529119,0.00038628606,0.0001845313,0.7982764,0.00044761066,0.012286013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006624807,0.005092161,0.02877711,0.0053769345,0.012317813,0.0017500247,0.20481601,0.0025596446,0.00022977563,0.30645695,0.42213604,0.0038627246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3579447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8832791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52533436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019135606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003304867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091504930","doi":"10.7202/043534ar","title":"Les facteurs qui militent en faveur de l'unification des voies d'action","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.04182020351605605,"score_gpt":0.31182358699557056,"score_spread":0.2700033834795145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091504930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96501476,0.006256869,0.010129456,0.011697521,0.00039224338,0.00017768807,0.000021854952,0.00010107778,0.0062085167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95110744,0.0053592687,0.0025413248,0.0002991344,0.0007236965,0.000019499035,0.000012028183,0.00002107401,0.03991651],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796367,0.00043182287,0.0002845977,0.00033138684,0.0003388784,0.00064962864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989693,0.00034125647,0.00012695252,0.00020929184,0.00010111381,0.00025205401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091851054,0.00019669239,0.00018892961,0.00008225057,0.0009257604,0.0001365218,0.000326784,0.00045044674,0.00032937853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038356864,0.00023256872,0.00016328895,0.0002881163,0.0015542526,0.00060224347,0.000023689789,0.00045978915,0.0001882861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005051466,0.00013553817,0.015654322,0.00018219098,0.000041421066,0.000011976183,0.118047304,0.00058395613,0.0034639519,0.14949541,0.0012749438,0.71105844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024274342,0.00014360818,0.16702734,0.00026156477,0.0002522762,0.000050797593,0.083847895,0.0010520632,0.004337891,0.030501725,0.7116939,0.0005882187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027561342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025358386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71047026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032549303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013553741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209252254","doi":"","title":"Khelawon: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Testimonial; Supreme court; Admissible evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Confrontation Clause; Federal Rules of Evidence; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.03940033143006439,"score_gpt":0.3080081986644263,"score_spread":0.2686078672343619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209252254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66720194,0.010721134,0.01665898,0.06453585,0.00064436684,0.0011837329,0.0000022139398,0.00020225304,0.23884954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829705,0.0042005577,0.0001993912,0.00063627627,0.00084795733,0.000007834503,6.0471996e-7,0.000011627603,0.011125246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996645,0.0003142275,0.00021944962,0.00018713746,0.00064760726,0.0019865946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993133,0.000087215965,0.00008438069,0.00019861109,0.00013575688,0.0001807675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004284697,0.00010833895,0.00015002575,0.000052663156,0.0020012925,0.00008660068,0.00061695656,0.00006863761,0.000044924418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033116597,0.0000736967,0.00011879126,0.00044248987,0.00018504243,0.00020253939,0.000048042133,0.001326702,0.00014207297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006134073,0.00007460323,0.0014191669,0.0000047218973,0.000048014124,0.000007748434,0.009835261,0.00003194772,0.00007255574,0.97945374,0.004039882,0.004951038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033456,0.00031301574,0.0037020845,0.00004601175,0.000058861155,0.0013717844,0.017552981,0.000040259012,0.000029603902,0.060088832,0.91600436,0.00038886192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016399961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91936487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007250245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024633892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093334220","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000972","title":"The Primacy of Liberty and Proportionality, Not Human Dignity, When Subjecting Criminal Law to Constitutional Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dignity; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitution","score_opus":0.13800594516062956,"score_gpt":0.38004659919723377,"score_spread":0.2420406540366042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093334220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04883169,0.046687536,0.0005134936,0.027850412,0.0005742697,0.0042363564,0.00008135518,0.00016322693,0.8710617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929872,0.0013072913,0.0003398459,0.0049498775,0.00011115191,0.00004813032,0.000002248746,0.0000052870114,0.00024897975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998256,0.00028584566,0.0004635324,0.00023202653,0.0004894444,0.0002731063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998843,0.00030458363,0.00020185861,0.00020277481,0.0002915862,0.00015617556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023527385,0.000120997836,0.00030126254,0.000010988192,0.0013279197,0.00006724416,0.0003226076,0.00004272353,0.00014505023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032166144,0.00008385177,0.00010245999,0.00008652644,0.00240095,0.00026086587,0.00009957781,0.00012278876,0.000027443186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001766705,0.000040265404,0.00090417924,0.00048394946,0.00001679233,0.0000031427235,0.00073140784,2.737116e-8,0.0000603187,0.99598986,0.0003847804,0.0013676101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002862394,0.00012774863,0.0031242396,0.0026379204,0.00040429464,0.000023034143,0.00041709197,5.334886e-7,0.00032962224,0.04528648,0.9470611,0.0003016536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022778405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042166772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016178089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093701036","doi":"10.7202/042942ar","title":"La Charte canadienne des droits et libertés: pour la protection des droits de la personne humaine ou instrument d'évolution de la société?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019662707491051673,"score_gpt":0.28479809938419154,"score_spread":0.26513539189313984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093701036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.929959,0.0016395813,0.0064113033,0.0072123967,0.00018995325,0.0003975619,0.000031711807,0.00015328628,0.05400518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622567,0.0017543647,0.004460271,0.00048245487,0.0007473037,0.000119192555,0.000009446841,0.00006278081,0.03010746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948056,0.0024590108,0.00038222413,0.0005412027,0.0003864005,0.0014255816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772114,0.0010607142,0.00022166553,0.00022829964,0.00011859756,0.0006496155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049784514,0.0003903707,0.00036631187,0.00015657755,0.0015712698,0.00035698424,0.00041224627,0.0010287736,0.00021234511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010364001,0.0004766365,0.00024898394,0.00049237796,0.004523383,0.00077957084,0.00005927256,0.0012529276,0.000062801875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010145261,0.00031090586,0.0013012083,0.0002923448,0.000110416506,0.00014478501,0.11937806,0.00037912698,0.004127933,0.51649946,0.00060388556,0.35675043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00221525,0.0005270825,0.04349183,0.0019626846,0.0006410767,0.0018516139,0.04565528,0.005449461,0.003062571,0.376483,0.5169822,0.0016779803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08016217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09165429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5163783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009541373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008136461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093779849","doi":"10.5539/res.v6n2p120","title":"Our Criminal Law Should Only Be 200 Years Out of Date - and It Should Be Consolidated","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Criminal law; Legislation; Law; Consolidation (business); Political science; Remainder; English law; Criminal procedure; Democracy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.3142786508652401,"score_gpt":0.4538553097503281,"score_spread":0.13957665888508802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093779849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047504883,0.35901582,0.000020499072,0.062141605,0.0007334054,0.0008643142,0.0000964541,0.00008048859,0.5295425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6233718,0.36928007,0.00025851993,0.0052767047,0.00018362615,0.0000025005168,0.0000044323874,0.000018424273,0.0016039582],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803245,0.0006788955,0.00045958627,0.00023173318,0.00037440943,0.00022294995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989909,0.0001916995,0.0002428048,0.00024169283,0.00025015697,0.00008276063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024340977,0.00014019522,0.00057279837,0.000026271378,0.0001768168,0.000019289466,0.00027496455,0.000023140217,0.00004052016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001113031,0.00011500934,0.00009453831,0.00010878924,0.0006290467,0.0001416579,0.00021571048,0.000106228086,0.000034374614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008513465,0.0002544011,0.0017393879,0.023849722,0.0005888331,0.00008474962,0.04417069,0.0000011062302,0.00049394916,0.33396125,0.5246628,0.07010801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010437395,0.00010119512,0.0008960097,0.0046608606,0.0003385754,0.0000022035713,0.0067426944,3.9474847e-7,0.000028287144,0.00004366194,0.9869393,0.00014246046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032549025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007259787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5758669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010508745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003711434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46899447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094737464","doi":"10.7202/1027852ar","title":"Les aspects historiques de la qualification de la prescription en droit international privé","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Medical prescription; Philosophy; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.01526697576060611,"score_gpt":0.3046865031662425,"score_spread":0.2894195274056364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094737464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7313326,0.0022096862,0.08530974,0.0078001954,0.0010886012,0.00018945638,0.000014052974,0.00016616556,0.1718895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587461,0.0011935479,0.0036079204,0.00029476397,0.0012458967,0.000029190796,0.000016479333,0.000024442188,0.034841686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968918,0.0016882356,0.00026697645,0.00032339446,0.00040433844,0.00042525056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981168,0.0012044971,0.00018529998,0.00019963713,0.00009101316,0.0002027456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033946768,0.00016535935,0.00017619853,0.00008747449,0.0004035026,0.00023300516,0.00051490805,0.00063774065,0.00021710109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016349193,0.00021299737,0.00012745138,0.00013627444,0.0012855752,0.0004020789,0.00003472653,0.0005620983,0.00005768139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003324048,0.000096844284,0.004449586,0.00006997975,0.00002990427,0.000012481837,0.040606603,0.00007674325,0.002699949,0.89275855,0.0034063659,0.05575974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017331526,0.00006129371,0.023426166,0.00016036058,0.00008216958,0.000036700178,0.0029045227,0.0014833888,0.0008353573,0.22389781,0.74667674,0.00026216224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014194455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016984366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7432704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005712048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020866035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095035352","doi":"10.7202/043293ar","title":"La technique législative québécoise d'entrée en vigueur des lois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.014284461297190158,"score_gpt":0.2816173892682008,"score_spread":0.26733292797101066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095035352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7149737,0.0075547094,0.02241336,0.021169782,0.00038977672,0.0006124079,0.00004261445,0.00024511619,0.23259854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8973478,0.0023707193,0.008543018,0.0007731979,0.0006813957,0.00005319899,0.000003486399,0.000035072848,0.09019207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751097,0.0006945688,0.0002943615,0.0003890704,0.00035900556,0.00075199857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984287,0.0007949939,0.00012581583,0.00024313937,0.00008728572,0.00032003893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014457017,0.00025339297,0.00028071567,0.000082190265,0.0006127002,0.00011741435,0.0004940597,0.0006931308,0.0005901276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004548614,0.00029254076,0.00021022926,0.00044924582,0.0031990577,0.0005729044,0.000057746558,0.00080754835,0.0003695743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050747018,0.00017047189,0.001302456,0.00013522219,0.000059403286,0.00015507953,0.22800575,0.00011078028,0.0008923415,0.50075704,0.0042656003,0.26409513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016592942,0.00009730908,0.0018723425,0.00035356684,0.00013379466,0.00008325934,0.013109273,0.00012036785,0.0023103422,0.08121359,0.90009606,0.0004441665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026543075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049541134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89583045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038433797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002723539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095042302","doi":"10.7202/042512ar","title":"Processus décisionnels, justice naturelle et équité procédurale dans la jurisprudence comparée de la Cour fédérale et des cours ontariennes et québécoises","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Natural justice; Sociology; Administrative law; Judicial review; Political science","score_opus":0.01711536684098008,"score_gpt":0.3235766174176489,"score_spread":0.30646125057666884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095042302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398393,0.001034894,0.003569998,0.0071125226,0.000094670104,0.0002781481,0.00002335046,0.0002160261,0.047831062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850667,0.0011284921,0.0062440457,0.00234736,0.00019422715,0.000047911355,0.000010231315,0.000033060296,0.0049279868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732214,0.0006568868,0.00028105135,0.00043221228,0.00059806457,0.0007096541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740845,0.0016915768,0.00015726102,0.0002320829,0.00018823841,0.00032237289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024511989,0.00025448622,0.0002945787,0.00008195376,0.0010485725,0.00036449253,0.0007286123,0.00040475267,0.00005659232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013328653,0.00025842787,0.00012068053,0.0003358377,0.0018564698,0.000775847,0.00007339522,0.0009021271,0.000030439103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023022575,0.00048372796,0.013395345,0.0003598056,0.000057114055,0.00020868688,0.36653426,0.0035127143,0.0013410976,0.595407,0.013445868,0.0050241505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011024737,0.0002509743,0.053921793,0.0008979734,0.0006173906,0.00034018233,0.1925016,0.001008004,0.0025636307,0.060721938,0.68462765,0.0014464074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026504265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27494368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67118174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075573137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010553359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099473540","doi":"10.7202/039341ar","title":"La création de la détention pour enquête en common law : dérive jurisprudentielle ou évolution nécessaire ? Un point de vue pragmatique","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Innovative Medicines Canada; GLS Industries (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.006728540014539198,"score_gpt":0.28824518846669844,"score_spread":0.28151664845215923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099473540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9139775,0.0004995869,0.031197703,0.009133728,0.00059963425,0.00032519366,0.000020162506,0.00011265528,0.04413382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983345,0.00051185937,0.003995298,0.0005161707,0.0005627208,0.000050151397,0.000023722716,0.000033430886,0.01096168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963131,0.001887161,0.00037341123,0.00036563244,0.00039936148,0.0006613092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799216,0.0010495506,0.000283424,0.0002716966,0.00011408466,0.00028909338],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003849173,0.00024189975,0.00025891227,0.00008017917,0.0010643458,0.0003417303,0.00043880782,0.0012085262,0.00035273746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045033425,0.0002970223,0.000214095,0.00028773773,0.0019607542,0.0006829262,0.000064922715,0.0014434624,0.00009698388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048902388,0.00021821326,0.0050376253,0.00017332671,0.000044456603,0.000085451844,0.048312124,0.00012443081,0.007035908,0.9028748,0.0017557909,0.034288965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077892345,0.00013942673,0.076616906,0.00054025085,0.00042919046,0.0003089187,0.021297647,0.0046735494,0.008270489,0.72436994,0.16181219,0.0007625483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0285702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030702244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17850484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001206299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040871254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102026828","doi":"","title":"Canada's Experience with Constitutionalism and Criminal Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.014521125493442992,"score_gpt":0.2756632039325957,"score_spread":0.2611420784391527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102026828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96991265,0.0021750955,0.0016517801,0.012641485,0.00024169503,0.00014887848,0.0000013909615,0.000019222847,0.013207783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611515,0.0013311714,0.00010204765,0.0004968578,0.00025445444,0.000007499353,3.3836562e-7,0.000004194539,0.00168827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979549,0.00006500541,0.00012012437,0.00013363204,0.0004288194,0.0012974933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994401,0.00008422143,0.00006415025,0.0000615326,0.00016758821,0.00018243123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052491477,0.000084685074,0.00008845166,0.000024023593,0.0010287644,0.00013237067,0.00018331544,0.00003186995,0.00013922549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012782846,0.00006696671,0.00001540315,0.00008958077,0.00045137727,0.00040704015,0.000016202097,0.0005404785,0.000008898559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016347758,0.000009782856,0.0012194624,0.0000068016966,0.000014676527,0.000012035907,0.0028037592,0.000005160351,0.00003879415,0.99103993,0.0008853107,0.0039479374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010034571,0.00052018766,0.011427561,0.00016488091,0.0004959173,0.0036398566,0.5605478,0.00005892727,0.00008335367,0.1300939,0.29103175,0.00093238876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8078457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94069576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.860946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007096666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012949466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102433557","doi":"10.7202/1000619ar","title":"Building a Law of Human Rights: Roncarelli v. Duplessis in Canadian Constitutional Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Charter; Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Sociology; Constitutional law; Political science; Bill of rights; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06625086608774737,"score_gpt":0.33006917552828835,"score_spread":0.26381830944054097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102433557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036710676,0.00019200977,0.000020958794,0.00038513352,0.00032363008,0.000084075815,0.0000363569,0.0000123643185,0.9622348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986942,0.000017157095,0.0009386717,0.00012209706,0.0001342419,0.0000018939749,9.891129e-7,0.000003546711,0.00008722148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873614,0.000118798205,0.00028550392,0.00012742984,0.00031440382,0.00041774422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992422,0.000026729345,0.00011273421,0.000079404716,0.00015437792,0.00038458375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006975956,0.00009067419,0.00016384842,0.000076750286,0.0045950566,0.000039105726,0.00029435486,0.000108585366,0.00075540616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031143827,0.00007790772,0.00008388604,0.000151334,0.0011486224,0.0003850947,0.000018460569,0.0002766113,0.000011804666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060118737,0.000025070194,0.0011535351,0.000004654321,0.00000907343,0.00009307851,0.0016137572,0.000004436788,0.000067471745,0.99675906,0.00017765156,0.00008620783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018559558,0.000044139342,0.0005109028,0.00017547542,0.000020210415,0.000050624025,0.000911157,0.0000017088312,0.0007813052,0.035283484,0.96189433,0.00014107711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95210534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9621476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035530835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008664377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104325844","doi":"10.7202/017308ar","title":"Significations et interprétations de la gravité des événements violents : le cas des voies de fait traitées à la Cour municipale de Montréal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.2760373960488288,"score_gpt":0.4555213728194736,"score_spread":0.17948397677064476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104325844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754054,0.0010468984,0.003691093,0.0034234545,0.000036634923,0.00013626598,0.000014260777,0.0001591224,0.0160869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864012,0.001772465,0.010481826,0.00025392618,0.000058057867,0.00008301437,0.0000060978573,0.000012957615,0.00093043956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832577,0.000566522,0.00019930344,0.00020600742,0.00016367398,0.00053874846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988086,0.00069622305,0.00006595666,0.00018486954,0.00009290713,0.00015143804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094592234,0.00013117204,0.00013302629,0.000076563156,0.0010063782,0.00018210299,0.00046465106,0.00014958883,0.000056843888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012262109,0.00013399542,0.000081307575,0.00012021183,0.00137183,0.00035022473,0.000071079885,0.00019969179,0.000049814513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070117276,0.0010711742,0.05424543,0.00012553773,0.00010853086,0.000078883255,0.49387133,0.0016529871,0.013121307,0.1793131,0.005979944,0.25036165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053359865,0.00012867573,0.5649546,0.00027483384,0.00023845813,0.0000429737,0.20701508,0.0003804249,0.0061978083,0.13975742,0.079958454,0.00051765976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03814166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07918355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51070917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041222834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049351645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96826345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109432895","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1292","title":"Doré: All That Glitters is Not Gold","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Tribunal; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Political science; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0986680875583345,"score_gpt":0.35984204932029845,"score_spread":0.26117396176196395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109432895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026407647,0.09374616,0.00030742818,0.38042304,0.0015380228,0.0014411518,0.00002461893,0.0003462543,0.51953256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.770538,0.101668514,0.00028878293,0.12090702,0.0005555258,0.000045030447,0.000008177325,0.00002757681,0.0059613716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799794,0.00031237726,0.0002700831,0.0003360378,0.00062913465,0.00045439927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989301,0.0001929815,0.00010754599,0.00044485542,0.000104078295,0.00022046149],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00188636,0.00016506948,0.00037634638,0.000014385982,0.00024195758,0.00009763091,0.0005754592,0.00007473825,0.0013650231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022939792,0.00014138846,0.00021284039,0.00013255031,0.0003001899,0.0003238513,0.0000730973,0.00014538555,0.0012100562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009605043,0.00003867177,0.0003122169,0.0017911335,0.0000311328,0.0000074050777,0.0016017758,1.9745669e-7,0.0000746361,0.48729077,0.478798,0.030044451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006220681,0.000022945316,0.000059614715,0.0018253726,0.00009951614,0.000002085668,0.000060759005,0.000002640337,0.000097121745,0.0010565287,0.99651617,0.0001950573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005750397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032035252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76789725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006937956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052759726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111984693","doi":"10.7202/043495ar","title":"Quebec's Comprehensive Auto No-Fault Scheme and the Failure of Any of the United States to Follow","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Government (linguistics); Individualism; State (computer science); Tort; Politics; Position (finance); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Liability; Finance","score_opus":0.012292465200847962,"score_gpt":0.2622544225348903,"score_spread":0.24996195733404233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111984693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98235625,0.00015713296,0.00015615484,0.016039977,0.00004048678,0.00022038027,0.000010748787,0.000014990297,0.0010038551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940204,0.00007600276,0.0009433572,0.0012773463,0.00005739836,0.0000062250474,0.000002019793,0.0000056318913,0.0036115937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991127,0.00015752923,0.0001557965,0.0001139978,0.00025766596,0.00020229019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.0004101344,0.0000899163,0.00017680682,0.00017714425,0.00007395426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033359329,0.000075454154,0.00016169269,0.00003613548,0.00028993597,0.000031265696,0.00031597778,0.000088177556,0.000030807583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003091185,0.000049210426,0.00007440892,0.00030892622,0.0013409781,0.000079349324,0.000050096605,0.00015862941,0.0000061451083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004898211,0.00008221304,0.0061174976,0.00015550078,0.0001553996,0.000004960584,0.29562318,0.001286589,0.009070894,0.65921545,0.018257538,0.009540956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012479873,0.000091743656,0.024572957,0.00023558426,0.00012907034,0.000004009154,0.08680663,0.0017583233,0.0033485745,0.008695272,0.8728024,0.00030746992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05527066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061924856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8545448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012399808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075473945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95519257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112670833","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2348705","title":"Reconciling the Principled Approach to Hearsay with the Rule of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025418034007989008,"score_gpt":0.2818038341356844,"score_spread":0.25638580012769535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112670833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85095173,0.0011301815,0.0023229404,0.0600156,0.000097966666,0.0005644755,4.432004e-7,0.000021569656,0.0848951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626756,0.00020173773,0.000171324,0.00049138244,0.00022544418,0.0000150985625,1.2085204e-7,0.0000071746413,0.0026201585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804384,0.00019193687,0.0001498223,0.000107433414,0.00039447253,0.0011124719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999387,0.00013719464,0.00009940476,0.0001554765,0.00014691196,0.00007399716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034408406,0.00007292285,0.000106584106,0.000016604954,0.00088525866,0.00011087316,0.0005223802,0.000031927164,0.000038917133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007497506,0.000034193115,0.000058232563,0.00016637327,0.00024589684,0.00019509766,0.000030841493,0.00074554584,0.000033600107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002599587,0.000027131222,0.00020420729,0.0000036875936,0.000039584225,1.9013623e-7,0.012291582,0.00008940507,0.00017772836,0.9825565,0.00022619353,0.004357758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008838964,0.0011740101,0.0032623354,0.00015036202,0.00019614292,0.0003797163,0.23607141,0.00023156892,0.0006287359,0.26828083,0.4880848,0.0006562141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072942474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013178806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7142757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026992866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012094011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112852255","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2005.34.4.316","title":"The Enduring Legacy of ‘Reckless Disregard’","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Demise; Duty; Law; Duty of care; Proposition; Order (exchange); Common law; Political science; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Business","score_opus":0.04968559655905262,"score_gpt":0.38046439981864427,"score_spread":0.33077880325959164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112852255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016124186,0.4411388,0.000005040037,0.06430336,0.00026740704,0.00039756796,0.000001413052,0.000049410453,0.49222457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8507064,0.14140598,0.00007648311,0.0012802164,0.0002733743,0.000020938389,7.741506e-7,0.0000074435025,0.0062283957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987446,0.00026163872,0.0003260145,0.00012359126,0.00029576896,0.00024840832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900365,0.00038007708,0.00013353025,0.0003454789,0.00005598814,0.00008126875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012782561,0.00008501458,0.0002558807,0.000011849631,0.0006845123,0.00008559758,0.0005584181,0.00001880934,0.00023155418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008678036,0.00005639248,0.0001341051,0.0002690932,0.00044249915,0.00031899347,0.00008211024,0.0001304909,0.00008829958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025182896,0.000018466439,0.00015037842,0.0003584241,0.000005644598,0.0000010247275,0.00019917611,6.276905e-7,0.0000040175137,0.8280537,0.010171812,0.16103421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029708224,0.000004335416,0.00013915537,0.0025002481,0.000034681947,6.9317554e-7,0.00008256831,0.0000010817844,0.00008162935,0.0008692,0.9961813,0.0000753941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012202667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07485066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004514346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004048332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9420309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117837668","doi":"10.7202/039339ar","title":"La consolidation des fondements de la responsabilité pénale en droit criminel canadien depuis l’entrée en vigueur de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011381799461153294,"score_gpt":0.2898497564251077,"score_spread":0.2784679569639544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117837668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678707,0.00063999003,0.00092945533,0.002807534,0.00042445984,0.00037006888,0.00012232743,0.00010094082,0.026734505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738966,0.0008609435,0.00309637,0.0007299106,0.00032963167,0.00008340236,0.000026858032,0.000077013254,0.02089927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930072,0.003551067,0.0005173822,0.00067579537,0.00042072774,0.0018278738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920648,0.005823115,0.0002124668,0.00045732182,0.00017259138,0.0012697269],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007802014,0.00043501618,0.00044753894,0.00021061269,0.0011476747,0.00039264146,0.0008614079,0.0012176643,0.00046989272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005191644,0.000549289,0.00022186618,0.0005312779,0.0054694884,0.0006849815,0.00010511138,0.0016544225,0.000054256052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002171228,0.00029111592,0.0453255,0.00036913832,0.00018517782,0.0007651736,0.24939628,0.00011536003,0.010308032,0.63532066,0.0013636622,0.0563428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013751674,0.0003512265,0.23634075,0.0006932424,0.0008378802,0.0013601051,0.029607952,0.0009667465,0.003600504,0.35857278,0.36480898,0.0014846742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39324582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72143173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3634453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005064095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018280447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118048514","doi":"10.7202/042630ar","title":"La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law","score_opus":0.01902072770710905,"score_gpt":0.2910930769058893,"score_spread":0.27207234919878026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118048514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.845906,0.00035544587,0.0018154499,0.0030595423,0.000048392634,0.00006520473,0.0000031422248,0.000114147944,0.14863265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810496,0.0002565118,0.002248478,0.00079767266,0.00034777122,0.0000064014303,0.0000012677497,0.000015155502,0.015277142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876404,0.00019559305,0.0001228319,0.0001735609,0.00022697066,0.0005169997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999265,0.00027049522,0.000042961314,0.0001337587,0.000045168774,0.00024262394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010153906,0.00009330847,0.000115192975,0.000040783263,0.00056457426,0.0001043949,0.0003129318,0.00018469093,0.0001825358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043125715,0.00010469958,0.00007382013,0.00017155141,0.00087151,0.00021532053,0.000021299484,0.00029148982,0.00015849016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027853584,0.000062423795,0.0038817227,0.000024555184,0.000015656733,0.00010359349,0.037617162,0.00005967065,0.0008101495,0.8700432,0.003544576,0.08380945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022517102,0.000045531513,0.010536686,0.00006462177,0.000048299094,0.000056554592,0.0072239577,0.00012750829,0.0006462049,0.090755746,0.88996947,0.00030027598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015527493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026817434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88642484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007382436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012615975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4342306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121600658","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.75","title":"Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Jurisdiction; Law; Convention; Scots law; Common law; Conformity; Legislation; Political science; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.3150991231661772,"score_gpt":0.46799635396163064,"score_spread":0.15289723079545342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121600658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6263308,0.0071285404,0.0028299207,0.36187822,0.0008000954,0.00062451925,0.0000031800064,0.000008195746,0.0003965527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556947,0.0017016708,0.00039780032,0.0011672627,0.00095245405,0.000011541236,2.2091798e-7,0.000006092081,0.00019347241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763906,0.00030657742,0.0005411144,0.00013949623,0.0010801217,0.00029361623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224997,0.006325942,0.00041485523,0.00015052689,0.0007717578,0.00008698121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016071642,0.00010410414,0.00016857772,0.00010468387,0.00034981396,0.00025817417,0.0016578415,0.000055153363,0.000017642862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061298274,0.000051979445,0.00009370935,0.0001779672,0.00037485667,0.0009777576,0.000075710435,0.000331142,0.0000023138405],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059381835,0.00040180862,0.046800263,0.00016703822,0.0001853847,0.0003882072,0.20846644,0.00011765023,0.006370736,0.14637011,0.009133078,0.57566106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036963194,0.0033061907,0.22794971,0.012891611,0.000419836,0.0015129028,0.081004955,0.00061275973,0.004100678,0.10201564,0.5614082,0.0010812036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015067429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010812229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5745799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016960781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035914726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73384184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122430379","doi":"","title":"Sui Not-So-Generous: The Unconstitutionality of Canadian Court Martial Jury Trials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Political science; Appeal; Charter; Democracy; Adversarial system; Jury trial; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.061069714058947164,"score_gpt":0.3479511611826425,"score_spread":0.28688144712369534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122430379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61295587,0.008168285,0.0015003232,0.3324427,0.001916884,0.0007039695,0.000052384865,0.00005043244,0.042209167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935495,0.0036821694,0.00002900663,0.0008703339,0.0011081722,0.0000016173856,0.0000016173796,0.0000035049572,0.0007540763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966005,0.00066375616,0.00045584366,0.0001324308,0.0005536678,0.0015937983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895525,0.0002631262,0.00024154881,0.00014046735,0.00018889962,0.00021070389],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014764657,0.0001012436,0.0002543037,0.00013029379,0.0013411614,0.000109176275,0.00047246143,0.00008987066,0.00015322631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010873072,0.00007092317,0.00019986664,0.00036766022,0.00045170996,0.00020968725,0.000009286727,0.0007810237,0.00001997767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007200511,0.000022944278,0.00032284518,0.0000010512249,0.000041942276,0.0000039986776,0.0007780654,0.000030793264,0.0002701615,0.9751219,0.0027222645,0.020612009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056077034,0.00032203653,0.004503288,0.000041787287,0.00018557295,0.00014762394,0.0073370677,0.00000845837,0.0004453837,0.3663931,0.61978054,0.00027437296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24882585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8511829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6170583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010872917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020924842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124166509","doi":"10.7202/040788ar","title":"La Charte canadienne des droits et libertés comme instrument de dialogue entre le tribunal et le législateur","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Charter; Freedom of expression; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08470558627733961,"score_gpt":0.3577829083021117,"score_spread":0.2730773220247721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124166509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.688174,0.010982873,0.00013281265,0.2614306,0.0034489094,0.00008895835,0.00013256386,0.000007530664,0.035601765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984654,0.008252377,0.00028975922,0.0029460264,0.0007458446,0.0000019358001,0.0000051810616,0.000015655558,0.003089203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760884,0.00037529346,0.00059359986,0.0001622978,0.00052655244,0.0007334138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713194,0.0007165882,0.0003507109,0.00007454276,0.00091408176,0.0008121217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003590035,0.00019728499,0.00033645466,0.0005626944,0.00040612617,0.00015630035,0.0005835109,0.0001245521,0.00008010324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007545043,0.00020577159,0.00018929604,0.0003338139,0.00083477225,0.00070627575,0.000071165516,0.00046160523,0.000015431588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014834476,0.00018947439,0.010427424,0.000038167513,0.0013721973,0.0034955502,0.11898873,0.0001375252,0.00008329922,0.74381953,0.029765012,0.09153475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075560407,0.00013860798,0.020118399,0.00063731184,0.0000795445,0.00064505555,0.029976787,0.000007726075,0.00013013644,0.022614159,0.9246647,0.00023199659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8351473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89489967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019889863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003250435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8391122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125259591","doi":"","title":"Identity Theft and Consumer Protection: Finding Sensible Approaches to Safeguard Personal Data in the United States and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Identity theft; Identity (music); Business; Consumer protection; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Computer security; Commerce; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.22332751756066196,"score_gpt":0.3179300503488369,"score_spread":0.09460253278817496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125259591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792422,0.00008686699,0.00014094713,0.016588688,0.000032072963,0.00024269884,0.0000151886925,0.000009546413,0.0036417968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989102,0.00003528307,0.00013814999,0.0002634619,0.000044803815,0.0000049030537,0.000013056193,0.000001979703,0.0005881559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992381,0.00012348552,0.000077823315,0.000168161,0.00024009573,0.00015235766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999676,0.0001497774,0.000017865055,0.00010090657,0.00001692126,0.000038521488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008220994,0.000051282375,0.000059667746,0.000033892524,0.00041242284,0.00016596846,0.00014286368,0.000021206495,0.000022817001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008552691,0.00003612196,0.0000041425733,0.00020945183,0.00013505381,0.00026808737,0.00007573674,0.000070691516,9.658321e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013450316,0.00013633133,0.58247805,0.00022989044,0.000050568364,0.000111225425,0.08178382,0.00020519264,0.00016889791,0.23993064,0.08465077,0.010120134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003513478,0.00004766498,0.22682385,0.00007943896,0.0000486183,0.000038163118,0.2654681,0.0041657956,0.00007231318,0.00445499,0.4979839,0.00046582342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41333312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037545717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012781098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31720647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130130495","doi":"","title":"All Convictions Are Not the Same: Rethinking CUPE’s Abuse of Process Doctrine in Cases Involving Plea Bargains","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Plea; Rebuttal; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Supreme court; Warrant; Innocence; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.10482562282533785,"score_gpt":0.3827937724761825,"score_spread":0.27796814965084465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130130495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816528,0.0032191407,0.000017618999,0.013008719,0.0004903594,0.00012391481,0.0000036451104,0.000015534075,0.001468301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541926,0.0032947925,0.00009695066,0.00066403154,0.00040286107,0.000004025826,2.0588105e-7,0.000008656556,0.00010923366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980351,0.00030206118,0.00060439756,0.00013157474,0.0006452534,0.00028166597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712676,0.001378027,0.0006517081,0.00012671395,0.00064428075,0.00007248722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022693595,0.00013042561,0.0004286488,0.00011684547,0.00060327613,0.00007764151,0.00041182354,0.000054206004,0.000008460421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003628365,0.00008704844,0.00011822697,0.00033354442,0.000518956,0.0005503396,0.00006370142,0.00034005396,0.00000189042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004446008,0.0005161703,0.12095697,0.00047533851,0.00055647333,0.00036274068,0.78822446,0.0018001323,0.0007305008,0.076845415,0.007299018,0.001788157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020939498,0.00088345294,0.07208332,0.004077545,0.00070377276,0.00031605025,0.584707,0.00018781876,0.0020309957,0.018979466,0.31307042,0.00086618646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036259985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038940255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3057714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011811341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001392663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97859657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130774242","doi":"10.7202/017307ar","title":"La négociation des plaidoyers de culpabilité : une pratique hétérogène","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Sentence; Economic Justice; Minor (academic); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Principal (computer security); Charge (physics); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Physics; Computer science; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.28967699562129556,"score_gpt":0.4402769995500537,"score_spread":0.15060000392875816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130774242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137214,0.00030481076,0.0005982384,0.018285755,0.00009493807,0.00014841792,0.0000012833855,0.00024074799,0.06660445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944329,0.0004174699,0.0034836617,0.00040948932,0.0002495131,0.000025585325,0.0000020941013,0.000007906855,0.0009713518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865645,0.00030735918,0.00016767862,0.00021447444,0.0002018295,0.00045220472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990704,0.00050278683,0.00006098381,0.00016540765,0.00008769579,0.000112692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094960496,0.00010104955,0.000119559634,0.00004335589,0.00048434848,0.00008536531,0.0002848811,0.00020944368,0.00016227963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019279404,0.00009708197,0.0000615859,0.00016600081,0.0007134534,0.00030057246,0.00004213682,0.00018240999,0.00017842051],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035166453,0.000113334776,0.016482772,0.000043581444,0.000014970749,0.000020734264,0.04866886,0.00013947628,0.001422368,0.17464419,0.0049691545,0.7534454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040696847,0.00020250012,0.11883011,0.00009385374,0.00010877671,0.00001828004,0.064439975,0.00012814369,0.0076930956,0.059432525,0.748079,0.00056678243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033040885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009900898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050720223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036344584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55249333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137752808","doi":"10.1177/026975800501200205","title":"The Constitutional Validity of the Corporal Punishment Defence in Canada: A Critical Analysis of Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law Versus Canada (Attorney General)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Charter; Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Human rights; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.053243791391118955,"score_gpt":0.3387063066031367,"score_spread":0.28546251521201776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137752808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7369846,0.0075243767,0.00017676402,0.24079895,0.0023341377,0.0012718348,0.0010277955,0.0000028489517,0.009878669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683976,0.0019388518,0.00006880193,0.001058184,0.00004529932,0.0000161105,0.00002045418,0.0000011186103,0.000011417612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988153,0.00022825204,0.00036058706,0.00010167257,0.00036381994,0.00013038657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980955,0.0012039224,0.00019459159,0.00010987289,0.0003473589,0.00004872764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009549046,0.000054381788,0.00020220898,0.00004179507,0.00020100584,0.000007842844,0.0003608073,0.00002149531,0.000052020343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001628948,0.00003275741,0.00007589572,0.00026100935,0.0013944695,0.000049849496,0.000032843716,0.000062424464,8.415469e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043164862,0.0000073217716,0.02201479,0.000025633557,0.00010758144,2.9804758e-7,0.00020859334,0.00011228326,9.1963244e-7,0.97638947,0.0006083471,0.00048161575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025264672,0.00011635955,0.57950145,0.0014549638,0.0028515158,0.000017641154,0.0034254785,0.0026995842,0.00014485467,0.00581819,0.40100163,0.0004418772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99961036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064071064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00505163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8961375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138053969","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110701.002","title":"On Commitments in Criminal Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal responsibility; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.1060817457554464,"score_gpt":0.34357845616626986,"score_spread":0.23749671041082346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138053969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14562204,0.000009163742,0.0000015225231,0.00074287714,0.00028747763,0.00010208379,0.0000039821316,0.000015449003,0.8532154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972035,0.0000031276459,0.000050289116,0.00223617,0.00009011779,0.00000765638,3.4050635e-7,0.0000037490688,0.00040503425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984355,0.000068163594,0.000106649255,0.00024336048,0.00044144326,0.00070489274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992489,0.00003580316,0.000028364684,0.00010343533,0.000066809014,0.00051668903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009848282,0.000071615854,0.00008611986,0.00014605997,0.0016835876,0.000085885724,0.0006414171,0.000060860508,0.0004753168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016032493,0.00007779238,0.000029112027,0.0007014398,0.0020972523,0.00037419694,0.000023337521,0.00012324807,0.00018132858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042448605,0.00001503043,0.003032251,0.0000012813447,4.2547663e-7,0.000028798533,0.026645053,3.0044184e-8,0.000011469145,0.96719587,0.00071953004,0.002346026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005797467,0.00027116726,0.14433992,0.00012710724,0.000030472167,0.0000031685797,0.11515042,0.000010752339,0.00052724045,0.10120883,0.6366228,0.001128401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6732633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86186165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86598706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092157454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009463565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138983123","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.1074","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Robert J Sharpe, Katherine E Swinton, and Roach Kent, 2nd edn. Toronto: twin Law Inc, 2002. ISBN 1-55221-063-4 Pbk, Np.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02046895009650561,"score_gpt":0.28996619938722806,"score_spread":0.26949724929072244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138983123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5972773,0.0039879307,0.00012797283,0.0036862716,0.0005400613,0.00041580596,0.0002671257,0.000031784566,0.39366576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373966,0.000059870406,0.00013425908,0.00045161965,0.00012219517,0.0000170571,0.000021000636,0.0000061625933,0.005448173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986393,0.00013431939,0.00029316932,0.00033917412,0.00030999805,0.00028404055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918795,0.00010608942,0.000101430356,0.00010681359,0.00019934507,0.00029837165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025572637,0.00018976929,0.0002757465,0.00003036378,0.0003775655,0.0001922291,0.00019748292,0.00008127915,0.0010379435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005471388,0.00016908681,0.000036565103,0.000052212872,0.00061646075,0.00066398864,0.00001641598,0.00010344596,0.000014417593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043201824,0.000090814196,0.0010201901,0.000010163913,0.00008211453,0.0000070397973,0.020696186,7.9078035e-7,0.00038038957,0.9632704,0.013886906,0.00051176746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006386083,0.0003842409,0.001528152,0.00005954651,0.00002869938,0.000020615375,0.00417055,0.00016519519,0.00025231004,0.020083794,0.97233266,0.00033564368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7692775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9323243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011140332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054298827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140211516","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-004","title":"Appointment of Thomas A. Cromwell to the Supreme Court of Canada*","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.025721809059974596,"score_gpt":0.22930305624783698,"score_spread":0.20358124718786239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140211516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000061819694,0.0000042631304,0.000018100094,0.0021157777,0.00020700855,0.0007244155,0.00033894,0.00002568047,0.996504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030206027,0.00007875494,0.00009666395,0.00013847936,0.00006907941,0.0000014173597,0.000005197704,0.00002057387,0.96938384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980601,0.00011124076,0.00027389926,0.00034234044,0.00085264986,0.0003597465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831223,0.00019729853,0.000334455,0.00051813066,0.00040202087,0.00023585044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030435008,0.0002556925,0.00043725586,0.0000830338,0.000564738,0.000017456365,0.0009543227,0.00021331779,0.00020840715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003316267,0.00022984942,0.00017604737,0.000017881546,0.0004266778,0.00007220336,0.00037606317,0.0002401651,0.0000089025225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005467963,0.000010307897,0.000002036128,0.000071546754,0.000085993786,0.00002712608,0.0010080907,0.000023754059,0.000010064439,0.93344146,0.064828545,0.00043639363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011773414,0.00006728691,0.000016297017,0.00020659018,0.00015808451,3.5224153e-7,0.00085352524,0.0000014524663,0.0004931558,0.00049847044,0.99734914,0.00023792066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7904259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042249978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044127335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053955824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97522646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140216640","doi":"10.7202/042629ar","title":"Le droit à la vie privée des personnes homosexuelles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Right to Privacy; Tort; Information privacy law; Charter; Confidentiality; Information privacy; Privacy law; Political science; Statute; Secrecy; Privacy policy; Law; Personally identifiable information; Common law; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Human rights; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.014974942064484922,"score_gpt":0.26975151526740027,"score_spread":0.25477657320291536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140216640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7963785,0.001032844,0.0017559543,0.0034757017,0.0000702481,0.00012022616,0.0000049761843,0.00015317937,0.19700837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98056006,0.0005158751,0.0031353517,0.000378113,0.00043560084,0.000014858495,0.0000027217213,0.000018358158,0.0149390455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998662,0.00014036293,0.00015216913,0.0002486726,0.00029369252,0.00050307857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992297,0.0002849132,0.00005565825,0.00017463362,0.000052417905,0.00020267592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006803228,0.00012265613,0.00016259367,0.00005735768,0.0011112922,0.00016469561,0.00038789646,0.0002192901,0.00014302351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003355458,0.00014072338,0.000121584104,0.00020731823,0.0015351225,0.00036545764,0.000029947092,0.0002606847,0.00015878108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023907938,0.00008877119,0.0028678693,0.00003820834,0.00002328215,0.0000380418,0.06625592,0.000038896895,0.00044299004,0.8415638,0.0022326682,0.0863856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002755052,0.000051778847,0.0038138994,0.00007984687,0.000050631643,0.000029511468,0.044091288,0.00008717487,0.000889167,0.07254296,0.87768066,0.00040759065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005526394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029233877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.875448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041209024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023377911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141118983","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.3.279","title":"Framed by Section 8: Constitutional Protection of Privacy in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Search and seizure; Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Data Protection Act 1998; Privacy law; Privacy laws of the United States; Constitutional law; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Privacy by Design; Right to privacy; Section (typography); Privacy protection; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy law; Computer security; Law; Business; Computer science; Law enforcement; Human rights; Supreme court; Geography","score_opus":0.11214406541490038,"score_gpt":0.3035562360709912,"score_spread":0.1914121706560908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141118983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877515,0.0015201048,0.0020416437,0.0047017327,0.000897254,0.00022128566,0.000039510196,0.000011897858,0.0028151032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664223,0.0012417855,0.0008533327,0.00077521405,0.0003072619,0.000016338352,0.0000060020484,0.000016160619,0.00014165962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667364,0.000697335,0.0007881679,0.00034207152,0.00020711508,0.001291663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965327,0.00095862965,0.00052295,0.00020999761,0.000547512,0.0012282103],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015392777,0.0002739889,0.000559921,0.00053461344,0.0006937979,0.000038315637,0.0005521937,0.00044617106,0.00012134048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061920616,0.00031275366,0.00009819236,0.0002089889,0.002448691,0.00040750878,0.00003261687,0.0011684982,0.0000016494618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016900189,0.00040156682,0.059181042,0.0067683,0.0003820795,0.023229785,0.28538495,0.0043114396,0.007775466,0.55729926,0.022678498,0.030897558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003156696,0.0017204102,0.19687885,0.0015819991,0.0076318937,0.031159462,0.6298166,0.0005469276,0.0020836266,0.008594545,0.11493544,0.0018935739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9536315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98554814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54870474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033529093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031319894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143034414","doi":"","title":"General Defences in Criminal Law: Domestic and Comparative Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Compromise; Doctrine; Punitive damages; Sociology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.149561597980628,"score_gpt":0.3894280440194031,"score_spread":0.2398664460387751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143034414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06207401,0.001442887,0.000022043292,0.0012681254,0.00029799563,0.00103106,0.000049983526,0.00011351207,0.9337004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37076604,0.002275716,0.0001954738,0.000049105005,0.0014510591,0.0000073008323,0.000042745807,0.000039482846,0.6251731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992616,0.0022764893,0.00046425746,0.0013939567,0.0018201472,0.0014291672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952542,0.002134097,0.00026067023,0.00061293243,0.0010556248,0.00068246265],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031818047,0.0005428293,0.0010032328,0.0013303702,0.00208761,0.00040094127,0.0014918682,0.00069354044,0.00034882125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004023675,0.0006105191,0.0002539225,0.00084535725,0.006065351,0.00065988203,0.00058397686,0.0021327836,0.00019365191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030283807,0.000082110455,0.0012175108,0.00014792322,0.00008227167,0.0005833101,0.025064444,0.000014514538,0.0000055736873,0.96799433,0.0032179544,0.0012872022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008207515,0.00034643256,0.0018306352,0.00056076556,0.00015744886,0.000012392043,0.023041638,0.00006218686,0.0000020057146,0.020545194,0.9517842,0.0008363333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02772236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30645376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94856626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012818823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003135778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143436194","doi":"10.7202/042765ar","title":"La primauté du droit. L'origine du principe et son évolution dans le contexte de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitution; Law; Humanities; Rule of law; Meaning (existential); Charter; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.00893895730900366,"score_gpt":0.2637252880007462,"score_spread":0.2547863306917425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143436194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9226813,0.00017017587,0.008217956,0.004773138,0.00009150492,0.00019564643,0.000015618385,0.00016600614,0.06368867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888474,0.00052584615,0.001221543,0.0010319306,0.0003044551,0.000033863664,0.000013163669,0.000033190696,0.007988634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765575,0.0006558554,0.0002493471,0.00034850364,0.00028096038,0.00080960506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985829,0.00057028054,0.000117048476,0.00021469343,0.000085423206,0.00042967722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031389853,0.0002002077,0.00024435448,0.00008162393,0.0009773655,0.0001828028,0.00039896736,0.00034263398,0.000060278533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007001276,0.00023315531,0.00012163236,0.0002457739,0.00159802,0.0005927,0.00004191928,0.0005149174,0.000033855125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055547196,0.00011337668,0.006517377,0.0000354492,0.000030087545,0.00009341767,0.07747019,0.00026254525,0.001847864,0.8846874,0.00070639455,0.02818034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095412554,0.00014873073,0.14532721,0.00023072278,0.00011488754,0.00023963259,0.008170536,0.0016786448,0.001806713,0.07583867,0.7646749,0.0008152103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12156661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33646944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80884874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026707777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006739449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146355027","doi":"","title":"'Time's Up!' Limitation Periods for Subrogated Actions in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Action (physics); Legislation; Law; Set (abstract data type); Political science; History; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02087530570022978,"score_gpt":0.2941322474249191,"score_spread":0.27325694172468934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146355027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98480415,0.00081991655,0.00058485614,0.010467696,0.0003287862,0.00019156351,0.0000040131968,0.000015664436,0.0027833562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926714,0.00040649102,0.00003745021,0.000044883593,0.00027330275,0.000008901249,0.0000065065187,0.000006789767,0.0065442994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981635,0.00008008985,0.00017951925,0.00009884918,0.00022721413,0.0012508065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961144,0.00011672914,0.000077670906,0.000044795866,0.00009875243,0.000050623217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009943857,0.00006338181,0.0000880536,0.000054892385,0.00054663135,0.000054395176,0.00013902933,0.00003805914,0.000041410658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012361608,0.00006419707,0.00004710879,0.00019811395,0.00004576384,0.00023770155,0.000004736515,0.00042282336,0.0000090025505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030653525,0.00018187272,0.03300326,0.000023855982,0.00010091576,0.000016789754,0.0054411446,0.0022159365,0.0026517152,0.86205846,0.031881887,0.06211765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018272994,0.0003523034,0.020624673,0.000088173125,0.00010798195,0.0001224575,0.13971873,0.0012089172,0.0002507466,0.3150784,0.5199088,0.0007115202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94171655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99937814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048360834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01528486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148229429","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2012.es06","title":"Why Re-open the Debate on the Preliminary Inquiry? Some Preliminary Empirical Observations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Empirical research; Economic Justice; Set (abstract data type); Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Procedural justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology; Epistemology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.29031070530761666,"score_gpt":0.3755566009655907,"score_spread":0.08524589565797402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148229429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7900302,0.0016784596,0.00033462027,0.20089316,0.0009951055,0.0006676906,0.000017788223,0.00003132831,0.0053516487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515584,0.0010964721,0.0009501622,0.044462115,0.0010416935,0.00013773829,0.0000069163807,0.00004971414,0.0006967969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937958,0.002218394,0.00092102936,0.00059175247,0.00027701326,0.002195973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883753,0.007532095,0.00063928607,0.00077208795,0.0008449574,0.0018362915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004191372,0.0005021166,0.00064341066,0.00042363687,0.003087175,0.0007545883,0.0030989936,0.0006432572,0.00049542467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013214408,0.0003730728,0.00022995273,0.00026631783,0.003348547,0.0012014931,0.00026053333,0.0020367578,0.00005029248],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056934566,0.00015871039,0.0011318648,0.000720035,0.00019580769,0.002776075,0.16507298,0.0006311048,0.00012031489,0.6349987,0.18311465,0.010510444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007381733,0.0028198368,0.10457763,0.00074913533,0.008658814,0.004166317,0.6838214,0.0004127474,0.00010133094,0.061154664,0.13184534,0.0009546634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081536815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110254936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010179656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055302945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148442110","doi":"","title":"The Grudge Informer Case Revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03791083770159604,"score_gpt":0.28991855517750864,"score_spread":0.2520077174759126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148442110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46167013,0.0009718628,0.00007744861,0.0064011347,0.000102095204,0.00013084373,0.000002903235,0.000045674766,0.5305979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764097,0.0021714799,0.00021588549,0.000034440265,0.000038592476,5.5966506e-8,5.1281853e-7,0.0000020379987,0.021127317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994211,0.00006211376,0.000045552715,0.00008633617,0.00020464364,0.00018024132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994666,0.0001195557,0.00006700616,0.00016001625,0.00009677068,0.000090048925],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002676682,0.00004908369,0.00008688435,0.000007839963,0.0017988834,0.0000108945105,0.00024604998,0.00004639766,0.0040035825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006940147,0.00004669817,0.00006733987,0.00005953734,0.00051972875,0.0005247008,0.000056425863,0.000050397328,0.00004967083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031229432,0.00008981869,0.0055522453,0.000041957243,0.00009648344,0.0025203396,0.5718098,0.0000047990097,0.00018253214,0.11512688,0.10816972,0.1960931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022759032,0.00006312104,0.04886419,0.00002123287,0.000037113325,0.0000986327,0.18626708,0.000027131548,0.0000080558175,0.00003132859,0.76420474,0.00014976962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5873306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4753581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.656035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013753807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009161833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149112291","doi":"10.7202/043613ar","title":"Réflexion sur l'assurabilité du risque environnemental au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012344724729515115,"score_gpt":0.2461448579253962,"score_spread":0.23380013319588108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149112291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925536,0.00396472,0.0006527935,0.0756008,0.0006507447,0.00020317269,0.000021295851,0.00006772198,0.02628512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93813384,0.0006825787,0.00045763954,0.0010901629,0.0016364661,0.000017369917,0.000007100791,0.000026039594,0.057948794],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976271,0.00029897664,0.00035784932,0.00043699986,0.00044748755,0.00083159725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987127,0.00046014466,0.00013020601,0.00027993892,0.00004177854,0.0003752275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009803025,0.00024441365,0.0002726098,0.00005043257,0.0010486856,0.00008565117,0.00043113914,0.00042903487,0.0018780484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031896698,0.0002883312,0.00024235045,0.00022184964,0.002169297,0.00057816674,0.000054354354,0.00048984285,0.00094902335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014713054,0.00066649594,0.043145593,0.00020653922,0.00011177821,0.0001115337,0.15385342,0.0010060753,0.00085263856,0.3425848,0.0100516835,0.44726232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032904747,0.00014673383,0.010097787,0.00009838237,0.00014021932,0.00002880836,0.008023848,0.0007279312,0.0007609498,0.005833558,0.9733505,0.00046220137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57211626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6684206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96329886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015291147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009305961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154168681","doi":"10.5897/ajest11.392","title":"An insight into environmental laws in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Legislation; Legislature; Environmental law; Government (linguistics); Business; Law enforcement; Public administration; Wildlife; Environmental compliance; Environmental planning; Environmental protection; Political science; Law; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.005752899179285244,"score_gpt":0.2190693575810914,"score_spread":0.21331645840180616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154168681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932324,0.0003895861,0.0000029196526,0.004927152,0.000084624946,0.0000905053,0.0000012999996,0.0000043989817,0.0012670574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991709,0.00033795065,0.00028472705,0.00014840961,0.000027662723,0.000003556044,1.4224436e-7,0.0000037184134,0.000022947474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985587,0.000044950302,0.00025055424,0.00018912382,0.0006069159,0.0003497592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994462,0.00003512567,0.0001390202,0.00012788412,0.000011743533,0.00024003851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053882785,0.000086217544,0.00015059057,0.00023912212,0.0003445918,0.00004347275,0.0005952938,0.00005097509,0.00030471882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005980373,0.00007464652,0.000013588717,0.00041504996,0.002467232,0.0009504858,0.0000958214,0.00019557113,0.000010604574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014863021,0.0002339606,0.49559113,0.000003256182,0.000007745324,0.00015133116,0.009301687,0.000007744652,0.23645577,0.0038186272,0.00019971756,0.25421417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007149826,0.0011115298,0.6205499,0.00005266285,0.000026299165,0.00022952378,0.25522172,0.00009979902,0.012202035,0.010936045,0.098228745,0.00062674365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37472233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44744548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25358742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011358685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060124777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90906197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155956786","doi":"10.7202/1006667ar","title":"Les obstacles épistémologiques de la méthodologie juridique : l’exemple de la théorie de l’imprécision","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05425924221755957,"score_gpt":0.3403195170325136,"score_spread":0.28606027481495405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155956786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8205252,0.005425335,0.04560111,0.0022815445,0.00035011547,0.00020834479,0.00003090943,0.00026349403,0.1253139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321767,0.006551909,0.052552644,0.00066910876,0.00041448403,0.00004150862,0.000004801478,0.000046477464,0.0075423843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99195427,0.0054080533,0.00040308642,0.0005352443,0.00032820512,0.0013711593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928087,0.006012868,0.00021895868,0.00037935915,0.000096943695,0.00048319175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009217754,0.00035883617,0.00043302865,0.00009811099,0.0009519603,0.00020828155,0.0009349326,0.0017566234,0.00047237918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004465286,0.00038548766,0.00029798827,0.00032350727,0.0047208485,0.0003634968,0.00014127216,0.0013130477,0.000049730217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001547801,0.00019186623,0.026059177,0.00014264717,0.000049113674,0.0006583215,0.04904477,0.000027557497,0.0016844369,0.8542075,0.0036199563,0.06415984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020686048,0.0002629856,0.030427843,0.00022580336,0.00016668985,0.00021241588,0.011805584,0.00006189793,0.0075018713,0.8600836,0.08851915,0.000525339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063631795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025573277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11777151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002953593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013215373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156841364","doi":"10.7202/042176ar","title":"Feu la D.C.D. L'arrêt Miller et la peine de mort","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Parliament; Political science; Bill of rights; Punishment (psychology); Philosophy; Humanities; Human rights; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012967492179912433,"score_gpt":0.32300622533267637,"score_spread":0.3100387331527639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156841364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7218536,0.00024557835,0.001017399,0.0074744686,0.00006167565,0.00007562317,0.0000037805632,0.000093275914,0.26917458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614732,0.00033489172,0.0021717902,0.0019031162,0.00029411877,0.000010600647,0.0000027318986,0.0000137561565,0.03379579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882436,0.00023173568,0.00011926932,0.00017679825,0.00025913637,0.0003887272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992925,0.00031025405,0.000039456663,0.00014135282,0.000031008956,0.00018545392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001216156,0.00009369439,0.0001207727,0.000040426185,0.00031078444,0.000098340955,0.00026213992,0.00022052042,0.00027735892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027998563,0.000100014164,0.000083782346,0.00013439052,0.0005030279,0.00017796125,0.000023272563,0.0003190435,0.00010177206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055631477,0.00011777269,0.009453836,0.00003641113,0.000041479867,0.00018049126,0.063042015,0.0002536885,0.0009797706,0.82257545,0.03657427,0.06668916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015082437,0.000017346068,0.009313168,0.00002819037,0.000028429444,0.000022789809,0.002978799,0.00006388004,0.00019921872,0.008515138,0.97850996,0.00017223558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022710538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050045103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9419357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003665056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016633394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4078459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157037176","doi":"","title":"Regulated Out of Existence: A Case Study of Ottawa's Ticket Defence Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ticket; License; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Political science; Legislature; Scope (computer science); Work (physics); Public administration; Service (business); Business; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.031082926429866223,"score_gpt":0.3518949880508556,"score_spread":0.3208120616209894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157037176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957928,0.00036560293,0.0002344889,0.00029850562,0.0001516181,0.0003239792,4.424965e-7,0.000028009992,0.002804564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988604,0.00018471057,0.00017495426,0.00000879406,0.00013816703,0.000007253728,2.0850408e-7,0.000008889779,0.00061658997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971418,0.00043581802,0.00044435245,0.00017576951,0.0005671493,0.0012351228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988763,0.00013820287,0.000368688,0.00020120296,0.00030326447,0.00011235294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00440819,0.00010899146,0.00025678703,0.0000779856,0.00036695064,0.00003750311,0.00038953064,0.0000693007,0.000022534863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041586184,0.000094056435,0.00009497114,0.000284616,0.00027803562,0.00019209823,0.00003295115,0.00063174014,0.000004904556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024359381,0.0034958688,0.040893383,0.000093862924,0.0003856051,0.00035342597,0.10355787,0.00007029827,0.0006750727,0.53396094,0.0002694548,0.3160006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030893236,0.01674772,0.0031981084,0.00032915227,0.0006537472,0.004494016,0.77717996,0.000366682,0.00048201086,0.17784514,0.014772756,0.00084139145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066749747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081207044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6736221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023742337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012635019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157906948","doi":"","title":"Chapitre IV. L'erreur judiciaire canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cairn.info","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.026407434378287315,"score_gpt":0.28657200963591123,"score_spread":0.26016457525762393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157906948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61798334,0.0020632865,0.000009154347,0.06492447,0.0107553685,0.0001946275,0.000032165808,0.000081181206,0.3039564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73761135,0.00029099121,0.0001321789,0.00084109616,0.002080898,0.000011391968,0.0000041228236,0.000019318828,0.25900865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997509,0.000086649896,0.0003537861,0.00045890364,0.00041834178,0.0011733155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981193,0.00019200274,0.0001541927,0.00048095858,0.00020915737,0.00084440183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078387506,0.00027874683,0.00031996198,0.00007254903,0.0009017505,0.00014024963,0.000692889,0.00038069361,0.01655702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005754615,0.0003003729,0.00019157866,0.00048218877,0.0014209704,0.0006434642,0.000116305804,0.00064058776,0.0033048652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017364458,0.00007844425,0.0049483143,0.000080499885,0.00002951523,0.00020494562,0.050530907,0.0000057999,0.0005005827,0.79742706,0.08109849,0.0650781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015735948,0.00009428494,0.0105502475,0.00011607628,0.00007965195,0.00003522941,0.0040158713,0.00008693559,0.00012271365,0.003980776,0.98036736,0.00039347366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.683415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8846506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89926887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006036165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058909255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157995933","doi":"10.1177/1362480614568746","title":"Post-Soviet criminal justice: The persistence of distorted neo-inquisitorialism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Persistence (discontinuity); Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Power (physics); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.14566568452595377,"score_gpt":0.36233840103375586,"score_spread":0.2166727165078021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157995933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83451784,0.00090660504,0.0011002504,0.030765157,0.006692467,0.00044120755,0.000025566238,0.0001614233,0.12538947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732965,0.000054205226,0.00028317366,0.0006842801,0.0013008997,0.000008686532,0.0000043530295,0.000011859191,0.000322903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747914,0.00073260063,0.00033870386,0.0002978913,0.0005965205,0.0005551385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976266,0.00094108016,0.00011990298,0.00043000057,0.0005898714,0.0002925396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001419586,0.0001598162,0.00029716163,0.00005134133,0.0004201766,0.00004147977,0.0008924201,0.00021887825,0.0007802099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041815713,0.000113186456,0.00013071486,0.00013783194,0.007981029,0.00012579585,0.00015978407,0.00028871527,0.00016166964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029691446,0.00004494465,0.000043871394,0.00003517947,0.000012647608,0.000017429848,0.037620783,0.0000020066286,0.0003817944,0.9577278,0.002378745,0.0014378964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010177735,0.0016918086,0.00086763053,0.000078530975,0.0029075495,0.00009510762,0.38638508,0.00013371404,0.0010901534,0.4523367,0.15268883,0.0007071408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013463799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011243942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5053911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037446237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158361136","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1240","title":"Police Questioning in the Charter Era: Adjudicative versus Regulatory Rule-making and the Problem of False Confessions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Charter; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Parliament; Criminal procedure; Silence; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.06513747930688289,"score_gpt":0.3798462052119304,"score_spread":0.3147087259050475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158361136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06534989,0.5478614,0.00008503317,0.1260509,0.0006615834,0.0046640835,0.000018285451,0.00009198628,0.25521687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819273,0.016279183,0.00015901614,0.0013771207,0.00013366443,0.00007470348,0.0000010886242,0.0000050910185,0.000042866708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981113,0.0009190785,0.00027257067,0.00011982086,0.00032027383,0.00025697207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987073,0.00076219,0.00016946786,0.00021574975,0.00009275403,0.000052557898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004030257,0.00009008013,0.00024967876,0.000013966854,0.00044101794,0.000028364864,0.00028135054,0.00004250339,0.00007152849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018374411,0.000050270355,0.00006368997,0.00018074605,0.0008341127,0.00029765957,0.000055411754,0.00017929873,0.000011721196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021610198,0.000021587604,0.00064859184,0.00030214348,0.000009866538,2.0570994e-7,0.02060204,1.4441376e-7,0.0000070537562,0.97399294,0.0006233614,0.0037704722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070576556,0.000033843677,0.0092590675,0.012894969,0.00029443429,0.0000060933066,0.006909446,0.000004569094,0.000010250321,0.0045142835,0.96513146,0.00023581329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065066125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048833857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96947867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034160737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007629123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9836095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158441135","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n4p13","title":"Adversary System Experiment in Continental Europe: Several Lessons from the Italian Experience","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adversary; Constitution; Legislature; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Democracy; Law; Democratic system; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.05062946448162339,"score_gpt":0.3336311601023473,"score_spread":0.28300169562072386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158441135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831885,0.00080537744,0.000010207596,0.005056057,0.00031540086,0.000043457494,0.0000070003475,0.0000041497988,0.01056986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868274,0.00019591814,0.000073997144,0.00044397038,0.00034302354,8.2196397e-7,2.9457192e-7,0.0000036477165,0.00025556036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.00011659049,0.00023182886,0.000070818,0.00027302437,0.00019111854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995204,0.00011855534,0.00010370928,0.00006558068,0.00006619085,0.0001255534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002378156,0.000059993883,0.00012901312,0.0000149532725,0.0003758143,0.000049186136,0.00017930834,0.000028879718,0.000021236474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043325545,0.000041353593,0.00004372165,0.000054590015,0.00039989574,0.00020503365,0.000033400218,0.000112237765,0.0000025773734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003206457,0.00007410197,0.010606596,0.000008632936,0.000016857693,0.00052310544,0.15460625,0.000007111484,0.00035938763,0.8316742,0.0020108537,0.000080827806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010373625,0.00018523369,0.047623686,0.0005117637,0.000042303745,0.00039613806,0.25103465,0.00007919211,0.00092962,0.0007287837,0.6971197,0.0003115472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017928496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093865115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83094543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073667725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009049412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159621412","doi":"","title":"R. v. Jones (1703): The Origins of the \"Reasonable Person\"","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Prudence; Reasonable person; Tort; Criminal law; Jury; Normative; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.04864294311384755,"score_gpt":0.29972673633766833,"score_spread":0.2510837932238208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159621412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70974874,0.00034267214,0.00003555419,0.049115993,0.00027330505,0.00014390286,0.000006320668,0.000014924825,0.24031855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97499114,0.0003095179,0.000104432824,0.000015209733,0.000043277436,7.4545135e-8,7.6400674e-8,0.0000022481886,0.024534049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993496,0.00008132924,0.000031342883,0.00010366313,0.00028109082,0.00015295815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991517,0.000086497996,0.00017633413,0.0004476916,0.000091537106,0.000046261077],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003344526,0.00005207088,0.00010670263,0.000004191325,0.0017924187,0.000023797294,0.0011336975,0.00004674624,0.0034388585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014111673,0.000034962723,0.00010636541,0.000023627885,0.0011099387,0.00051309605,0.00013885596,0.000044688695,0.000011125711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001836951,0.00014200422,0.055594612,0.00007318624,0.00011835466,0.000010535064,0.39053592,0.0000070715664,0.002000608,0.4567447,0.02612531,0.06846401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017244686,0.000030930518,0.64553964,0.0000629319,0.00006574194,5.029165e-7,0.18463027,0.000013602505,0.000093292314,0.00009437848,0.16921538,0.00008088331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8672869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70783675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.589945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021208671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013935531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160063269","doi":"","title":"Truth Before Punishment: A Defence of Public Inquiries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSE Research Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Politics; Witness; Punishment (psychology); Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.3971708471475116,"score_gpt":0.5188976835012524,"score_spread":0.12172683635374082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160063269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93752795,0.0011441071,0.00016681965,0.025759846,0.00019936114,0.000321302,0.000033517306,0.000054668326,0.034792405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960329,0.00066003035,0.0007730521,0.000033943124,0.00013467782,0.000012555084,0.000007234306,0.000007605787,0.0023379799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968066,0.00082721317,0.00021332398,0.00022638663,0.0012560554,0.00067039754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827445,0.000554326,0.000048331316,0.00027442625,0.0005811063,0.00026735687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004440055,0.00007432043,0.00015131196,0.00016034224,0.0005175229,0.00010208457,0.00046418337,0.00007813758,0.00041782582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007904462,0.00006491023,0.000057307723,0.00097401196,0.0024908609,0.00037747817,0.00009315384,0.0002841713,0.000041332834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013433844,0.00025228373,0.007851581,0.00005004425,0.0000100151965,0.000014413966,0.006837602,6.7640406e-7,0.00014034065,0.9706331,0.0011378389,0.013058654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025596365,0.00036634106,0.003923481,0.00013380339,0.00000908383,0.000004018845,0.036788773,0.000022602548,0.00087779155,0.06843973,0.88900584,0.000172551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011473764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057190373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90219337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010517964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007410922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94629496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161677596","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1045","title":"Between Here and There is Better Than Anything Over There: The Morass of Sauvé V. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Chief executive officer; Political science; Management; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.036028208413606586,"score_gpt":0.30564712146575795,"score_spread":0.26961891305215135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161677596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6189856,0.2907156,0.000014678074,0.04123309,0.0003132539,0.0011694159,0.00007053991,0.000045456607,0.047452353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271126,0.012119527,0.00004023731,0.00453767,0.00014442175,0.000009679568,0.0000025134266,0.000017164546,0.00041751692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789274,0.0005061746,0.0003411472,0.000264521,0.0006094409,0.00038596446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989471,0.0002765605,0.00017242196,0.00036100528,0.00011719431,0.00012575547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012426596,0.00018352715,0.00042374447,0.000008600984,0.0004730649,0.00006622565,0.0003938749,0.000073195835,0.00075609237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013618177,0.00012305717,0.00010670175,0.0002197018,0.00031883395,0.0002082541,0.000046132143,0.00022914415,0.000008289177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022393544,0.00008786719,0.52823526,0.0052799094,0.0003756836,0.000042724765,0.003946225,0.0000011402398,0.00018785882,0.26173925,0.17691901,0.023162637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078408986,0.00002414863,0.009199486,0.0014302525,0.00015393514,0.0000022680715,0.00029595662,6.408465e-7,0.0000868774,0.0007940971,0.98774165,0.00019228092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66679794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79759336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008970876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047021985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82786816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161752717","doi":"10.1017/s0008197302001551","title":"Digging the Dirt: Disclosure of Records in Sexual Assault Cases","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Attendance; Anonymity; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Law; Section (typography); Psychology; Sexual violence; Poison control; Medicine; History; Suicide prevention; Business; Medical emergency; Advertising","score_opus":0.06966465143572685,"score_gpt":0.3151801492568423,"score_spread":0.24551549782111542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161752717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8888802,0.0016826168,0.000019654466,0.038249265,0.000549677,0.00012932306,0.000008693135,0.000016191,0.07046439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656767,0.0004124846,0.000014348036,0.00034822235,0.0006834335,0.0000026670702,2.3536188e-7,0.0000075451617,0.0019634003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824727,0.0004758864,0.00028823718,0.00010144502,0.00055427005,0.0003329246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884844,0.00062938867,0.00016669258,0.00018809272,0.00008519252,0.00008220239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022019288,0.00009138923,0.00015220609,0.000025156412,0.0012034872,0.00014163835,0.00054139184,0.00005175523,0.00015528192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003170132,0.0000490956,0.000076640834,0.00022925534,0.0005710666,0.00028825118,0.00005180114,0.0004931305,0.000020975545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022912804,0.00048376338,0.06129339,0.00007619488,0.00013881347,0.0010584189,0.07741639,0.00034949466,0.0007224526,0.52527153,0.21366607,0.11929435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007346732,0.00035072144,0.03703982,0.00039791418,0.00016028644,0.0013025987,0.088741444,0.0004185934,0.00025613638,0.0020293288,0.8680511,0.0005173794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023690136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051251512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65438503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007332578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039434133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164156301","doi":"","title":"Alternative Models of Court Administration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial review; Accountability; Administration (probate law); Separation of powers; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Law; Safeguarding; Administrative law; Judicial activism; Independence (probability theory); Business; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.024429410764240513,"score_gpt":0.3175647037899948,"score_spread":0.2931352930257543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164156301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8004479,0.0028517433,0.08212304,0.009111071,0.00041625457,0.00020249843,0.000004257176,0.000039305356,0.10480393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960714,0.0012936678,0.00007137464,0.000016396743,0.00044072585,0.000001162674,9.3791147e-7,0.0000043973196,0.0020999114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984707,0.00008388349,0.00018624184,0.00008085829,0.00035500838,0.00082328153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995844,0.00004431175,0.00014826847,0.000051490508,0.00013306177,0.000038487982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014088395,0.000054837332,0.00008813588,0.000038133014,0.00025043098,0.00003494303,0.00018344546,0.000038549173,0.000027727403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034001972,0.000051194947,0.00006153731,0.000090835354,0.00010902072,0.00034511808,0.0000074499917,0.00038608565,0.0000064364667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026324586,0.000034790162,0.00020933681,0.0000013348144,0.000010843581,0.0000016860536,0.0004444118,0.00029736807,0.0001138121,0.9967076,0.0001655213,0.0019869457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012248127,0.00016154235,0.000084442276,0.000013716168,0.000017406846,0.000029434734,0.0033318393,0.00024564844,0.00036449375,0.9925704,0.0029920992,0.00006649684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005483899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028071847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19562352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039910641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021922544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20065081271940535,"score_gpt":0.4318830265874217,"score_spread":0.23123221386801637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166165129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7945558,0.0043970766,0.0003018198,0.19422165,0.004626565,0.00046701028,0.000004809601,0.0000072043886,0.0014180754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963145,0.001474824,0.0004889459,0.0005119825,0.0009442363,0.000010353775,2.4287394e-7,0.000007394865,0.0002474885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716896,0.00031929888,0.000607924,0.00015429495,0.0014789082,0.0002705939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498886,0.0022319036,0.00048092374,0.00020176411,0.0018822192,0.00021430977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038831343,0.0001263894,0.00023667722,0.00034538208,0.00022434632,0.00013825607,0.0013059711,0.00007157836,0.00029449761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048029083,0.00007409984,0.00016591237,0.00023321834,0.0007996398,0.0016007868,0.000036646685,0.0002704628,0.000006087587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019826377,0.0006359358,0.013233401,0.00009288182,0.00042312682,0.00029384383,0.2639153,0.0004673163,0.05691799,0.15893699,0.012760606,0.49033996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012777384,0.0049009174,0.05831066,0.013107699,0.001034364,0.00054230343,0.07355303,0.0005566609,0.044186193,0.012384872,0.78915054,0.0009950147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.135381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34295338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77638996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008831605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023312047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8703766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167628134","doi":"10.7202/017370ar","title":"La détention provisoire au Québec : éléments de connaissance et propositions de réflexions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Warrant; Harm; Political science; Law; Criminology; Remand (court procedure); Psychology; Supreme court; Business","score_opus":0.31942012997526076,"score_gpt":0.47439129890022974,"score_spread":0.15497116892496898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167628134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190743,0.00030571595,0.0020274892,0.098096035,0.00012877432,0.0003055128,0.000005743838,0.0003149505,0.07974153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452204,0.00012592674,0.0016978113,0.0014432004,0.00015720137,0.000067085326,0.0000040724462,0.000007968607,0.0019747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870116,0.00030099644,0.00014457857,0.00020782674,0.0001722179,0.00047321597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993953,0.00017683934,0.000059901173,0.00016623676,0.000069184134,0.00013252287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061567023,0.00009631322,0.00009912634,0.00004011921,0.0008320131,0.00008357208,0.00027565125,0.00013446763,0.00013659507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006007474,0.0000933257,0.000067393696,0.00008740232,0.0006401356,0.0003524686,0.000054277967,0.00019375465,0.00016056541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006542219,0.00054572243,0.023310583,0.000078802215,0.0000314646,0.000048958856,0.04299628,0.00011458205,0.0038806535,0.6427281,0.012050925,0.27414852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046789544,0.0002091829,0.1251884,0.00023038975,0.00017713127,0.000039784176,0.0183827,0.00016085496,0.004596012,0.019823719,0.83019346,0.0005304941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07419815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14708337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81814253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010554006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002517263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93196684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169189483","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.46.2.107","title":"Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Publicity; Legislation; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Salience (neuroscience); Prison; Subject (documents); Psychology","score_opus":0.1141885114976563,"score_gpt":0.3546432759040277,"score_spread":0.24045476440637142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169189483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96071744,0.002091165,0.0022407148,0.027056132,0.0008930758,0.00019564621,0.000015979429,0.000037747413,0.006752121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98932046,0.002204885,0.0021632207,0.0052782088,0.0007125728,0.000027056092,0.0000024065027,0.00003240296,0.00025879784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958801,0.00080532226,0.00069098466,0.00044640485,0.00019675808,0.0019803992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464,0.0017170443,0.0006232702,0.00042911773,0.00061898,0.0019715726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024225584,0.00036749235,0.0005855294,0.00048673837,0.0019229812,0.0002724209,0.0012624975,0.00032564785,0.000121794954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073023397,0.00033659648,0.00019337038,0.0002718532,0.0050726337,0.00052592665,0.00006338732,0.0013223971,0.000019061416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025012178,0.0000768499,0.0019427058,0.0005541902,0.000115439245,0.0052332007,0.28312895,0.0010157097,0.0004327659,0.6874718,0.0014841543,0.018294124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064094376,0.00080387417,0.037474174,0.0003194335,0.0056720264,0.009082143,0.8696877,0.0000284099,0.00015871826,0.01610783,0.059406802,0.0006179709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19722582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43883935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67136395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001841716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008233098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170895668","doi":"10.7202/043854ar","title":"Fragilité et résistance des codes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0217466793427643,"score_gpt":0.29739815697943023,"score_spread":0.2756514776366659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170895668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8135511,0.024197279,0.0062810145,0.0399004,0.00047557396,0.00014164642,0.000034577097,0.000103018734,0.115315385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8910098,0.004075636,0.007019591,0.0028414957,0.0005775199,0.0000110858855,0.0000032604662,0.000019714877,0.09444187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807715,0.0002716584,0.00024683055,0.00033063092,0.0003557444,0.00071797485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889904,0.00041377117,0.00008879977,0.00022993832,0.00008237559,0.00028609787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000998768,0.00018592982,0.00023339818,0.000037835667,0.0007281737,0.0001351233,0.00039488537,0.0003548659,0.0007566834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033158474,0.00022109007,0.00015754337,0.00033278565,0.0032112831,0.0005532031,0.000030059893,0.00050497125,0.00042397564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028379429,0.0000797513,0.0016952566,0.00009746896,0.000024923254,0.00003323926,0.03656268,0.00017693224,0.00022655269,0.83564395,0.0057026558,0.11972822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014718562,0.000054598586,0.0056943214,0.00023417584,0.00007629451,0.000018626124,0.0067242873,0.00022995168,0.0004517206,0.1688159,0.81722474,0.00032818443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005175796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021739906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8115221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014186028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016514966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171747972","doi":"","title":"The Responsibility Crisis in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Audit; Economic Justice; Responsible government; Public service; Accounting; Law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.030217115693439062,"score_gpt":0.31086380568503946,"score_spread":0.2806466899916004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171747972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03287973,0.28000975,3.127624e-7,0.6628412,0.00037273963,0.0007805071,0.000033993445,0.000010884294,0.023070868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8279758,0.12045458,0.0000390702,0.050665315,0.00014306007,0.000042352814,0.000003838953,0.0000062984054,0.0006696636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985131,0.00033923762,0.00025730726,0.0001773347,0.00024438027,0.00046865855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900794,0.00019396897,0.000038455335,0.00028627945,0.000033705306,0.00043966834],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014676193,0.000077051576,0.00014822719,0.000021265687,0.00048684355,0.000034193163,0.00036855406,0.00001873012,0.00095341477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024905757,0.00006136369,0.00004014563,0.0002662949,0.000084418636,0.00013578674,0.0000130656745,0.00011927634,0.00007517154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000382513,0.0000033270533,0.009941133,0.000069760354,0.0000043132077,0.000029224155,0.00034462957,0.0000015424702,1.7187955e-7,0.0014623089,0.84786487,0.14027491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023712262,0.0000029717714,0.0036489237,0.00029496016,0.000010294703,0.0000010346436,0.0023717978,0.0000015965408,0.0000010378751,0.00009534763,0.9934677,0.000080608384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7950961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004383304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009350314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174084167","doi":"10.71781/2497","title":"Les valeurs afférentes à la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés dans le discours judiciaire : utilisations et sources","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.016222618040542293,"score_gpt":0.22831435031205594,"score_spread":0.21209173227151365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174084167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86453146,0.011753243,0.00021003842,0.005127514,0.0007818936,0.00029638747,0.00015435841,0.00011936139,0.11702572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92607194,0.0040694876,0.00020141543,0.000095950454,0.00015152375,0.000029762663,0.0004228801,0.000038660786,0.06891838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658346,0.00071211206,0.0004335359,0.00073953817,0.00076015067,0.0007712285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782085,0.00046772105,0.000442848,0.00031964164,0.00033152656,0.00061739463],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004833678,0.0005258948,0.00046865756,0.00026036936,0.02082505,0.00014465499,0.00068128004,0.00047761036,0.000058451475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018613509,0.000626271,0.00041393246,0.00054928777,0.0024916471,0.0011897132,0.00012977043,0.0005906019,0.000034288252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001537644,0.00027769085,0.025901267,0.000107646454,0.00021246893,0.0010770422,0.49388823,0.0022040547,0.0017033754,0.47039375,0.0004395543,0.00364116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065867475,0.00015003086,0.24546364,0.0012503774,0.00065940106,0.00075493037,0.60204273,0.0006077335,0.0012858135,0.004917111,0.14110884,0.0011007196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89761466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90844333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46547666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004590215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004138679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2174934790","doi":"10.29173/alr280","title":"Criminalizing Terrorist Babble: Canada's Dubious New Terrorist Speech Crime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07912889308926983,"score_gpt":0.34827155983299,"score_spread":0.26914266674372017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2174934790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018001642,0.15675648,0.000019492878,0.08278825,0.0020537786,0.00096423196,0.000008215462,0.00009884631,0.7555105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85046595,0.025901513,0.0009656451,0.038471375,0.0022670524,0.000060325827,0.000053929845,0.000097912685,0.081716284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714684,0.00028595532,0.0005265564,0.00046594825,0.0008767939,0.00069791987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978544,0.000289437,0.0001949589,0.000552367,0.00020310545,0.00090574607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009717981,0.00027902945,0.0005594366,0.00002051568,0.0004976674,0.00013902929,0.00076034194,0.00009415363,0.000745967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012673887,0.00025455173,0.00013512462,0.0003481378,0.0002378486,0.0003594732,0.00008367964,0.00021417512,0.00040740677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011565526,0.000036339006,0.00033849297,0.000763048,0.00002541607,0.00009857628,0.0019909965,2.935973e-7,0.000008234517,0.1055485,0.8739085,0.017270029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119207456,0.000036189038,0.000059154976,0.0018494226,0.00019443748,0.00003133235,0.0006889403,0.0000010420227,0.000041410516,0.00046155968,0.9961681,0.00034925475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99681795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050150586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026389558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179414445","doi":"","title":"The Legacy of Justice Louis Lebel: The Civilian Tradition and Procedural Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03395930859637696,"score_gpt":0.30747211115176015,"score_spread":0.2735128025553832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179414445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7264024,0.017806126,0.0004972616,0.20342074,0.00094639417,0.0004289847,0.0000021765923,0.000044550896,0.05045135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962091,0.0023378741,0.000007861657,0.00023696927,0.00046288848,0.0000025648696,2.2196613e-7,0.000005060259,0.0007374805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983862,0.00018612125,0.0001562282,0.000080614256,0.00036764782,0.00082319486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994109,0.00017805408,0.00011550784,0.00008113312,0.00012397607,0.000090405236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036098415,0.00006377595,0.00007681658,0.000012685878,0.0012311088,0.00020574454,0.00029053053,0.000034820387,0.0000039394104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029266078,0.000035550118,0.000042620115,0.00011540449,0.0005108692,0.00041740475,0.000015602716,0.0006104724,0.0000044403787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035325727,0.000011314171,0.000034228637,0.000004295827,0.000014526354,5.865621e-7,0.004858989,0.0000027928838,0.000028214181,0.9889834,0.0009662056,0.005060135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029098633,0.00033540622,0.0001698746,0.000034681954,0.00014328763,0.00021194758,0.19565414,0.000033553424,0.000054624954,0.64587885,0.15708056,0.00011209269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024198524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046105403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34310454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025012277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019364429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97130066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181301847","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.55","title":"The Right to a Fair Fight","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Harm; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Deadly force; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04345892375559509,"score_gpt":0.3566706915972829,"score_spread":0.3132117678416878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181301847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030041175,0.058917828,0.0005655988,0.2218469,0.0007746096,0.00090940186,0.0000022606623,0.00014109776,0.7165419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50347847,0.14876594,0.0049720416,0.22398002,0.0073889084,0.00033368418,0.0000121446965,0.00010923838,0.11095955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980492,0.00035687207,0.00030183097,0.0002798855,0.00054034987,0.00047183593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846554,0.0004900769,0.000080920625,0.00043083998,0.00011308409,0.0004195477],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017209514,0.00014739491,0.0002773145,0.000012668303,0.0012583521,0.00016353218,0.0007416855,0.00005022958,0.00075882627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083532755,0.00009254239,0.00015813792,0.00023967751,0.00021515043,0.00017775489,0.00007772028,0.0001421555,0.0018873261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053028207,0.000006942635,0.000002117027,0.0002062725,0.000002768058,0.0000024217445,0.00037581005,1.14632456e-7,0.0000057241214,0.7403997,0.19365571,0.06533713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038493636,0.00006262611,0.000029723342,0.0013835107,0.00010884716,0.000004506594,0.000071450384,7.8195677e-7,0.000037742364,0.004880356,0.99323523,0.00014674729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006109453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01589042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062019244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014082689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181630519","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1046","title":"Re-Constructing the Work of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal: First Steps to a Fairer Process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Process (computing); Rental housing; Renting; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Sociology; Process management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.06177985682178997,"score_gpt":0.3334350345422878,"score_spread":0.2716551777204978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181630519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92643833,0.00007688103,0.000003844034,0.05138729,0.00020869025,0.000105073836,0.0000016617984,0.0000045236907,0.021773698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973288,0.00001662007,0.000041467836,0.0009328062,0.0013250844,8.4619506e-7,3.0634677e-8,0.0000054412644,0.00034886185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988029,0.00011747656,0.00031147056,0.00007363673,0.0004661671,0.00022833442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931055,0.00010350358,0.00032448568,0.00006174267,0.00012046958,0.000079248835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006629561,0.00007715308,0.00019129913,0.000031688676,0.0013592433,0.00012144489,0.00032218965,0.00006431624,0.00005427899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017356093,0.000046524012,0.00013747925,0.00027837534,0.0005052668,0.00020192821,0.000053945252,0.00025251377,0.0000010659925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097834134,0.00007137805,0.015548276,0.000037569505,0.00005461062,0.000006795405,0.89758015,0.000015081045,0.00002193724,0.07309916,0.0035201104,0.009947079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017567809,0.00042090905,0.086043514,0.001410742,0.00043202817,0.00009199334,0.31798533,0.000006011711,0.0004047514,0.021832833,0.5688765,0.0007385938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06798819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22031161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57959485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016933333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019238266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182806550","doi":"10.1089/elj.2008.0028","title":"Regulating Canadian Elections in the Digital Age: Approaches and Concerns","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Download; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05895455357080293,"score_gpt":0.33713673323906207,"score_spread":0.27818217966825914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182806550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5430442,0.00042360238,0.000023506302,0.062119223,0.000095303374,0.00012986871,0.00001031916,0.000018220087,0.39413574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692816,0.00019622307,0.00003285496,0.0012748813,0.0010599755,0.0000011734927,0.0000013656845,0.0000035458156,0.00050181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913836,0.000094294934,0.00014253295,0.00008771149,0.00014600024,0.00039111194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995409,0.000087410306,0.0000452928,0.00004658916,0.000033872628,0.00024588645],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037025998,0.00007072986,0.00007921079,0.00011962857,0.002025797,0.00080227375,0.0000822928,0.000057125264,0.0000046613372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019023949,0.000057125093,0.000026606174,0.00020241056,0.00022396925,0.00026726702,0.0000050759822,0.0002506946,0.0000014425218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015083359,0.000007866758,0.0003762712,0.0000014634824,0.0000025900324,0.0000054540183,0.0054556527,0.0000028247698,0.0000037139866,0.98181176,0.0002388851,0.012092023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020017421,0.00020412798,0.022048354,0.00004132971,0.000018899309,0.0005917347,0.010395379,0.00007541858,0.000016152993,0.39065593,0.57554936,0.0002031502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40530998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52220535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018082235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002824315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183938297","doi":"","title":"The Exclusionary Rule in Canada: Trends and Future Directions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.00674528226926408,"score_gpt":0.21095836243468527,"score_spread":0.2042130801654212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183938297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29576603,0.0010336284,1.8262935e-7,0.44427964,0.0017020488,0.00026381106,0.000046550922,0.00011422868,0.2567939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.082699046,0.017288536,0.000057252386,0.00010153116,0.00033376258,0.0000021448498,0.00013641028,0.000019168328,0.89936215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988435,0.0001850233,0.000093575894,0.00027266808,0.00030345665,0.00030180658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993327,0.00019757022,0.00009812446,0.00016407821,0.0000360462,0.00017147133],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000051504416,0.00015938938,0.00017151645,0.00016222324,0.0014291119,0.000102018836,0.00038046588,0.00018482169,0.0006061248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016359409,0.00014599576,0.000056082652,0.0005724511,0.000107985834,0.00089159474,0.000082953,0.00033982634,0.000008701358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011901058,0.000029860856,0.008395197,0.000045686156,0.000032201453,0.00014021517,0.010016488,0.0000018835677,6.311108e-7,0.022832617,0.9175574,0.040828772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005445257,0.0000069523503,0.118581116,0.00004076511,0.00002020681,7.143659e-8,0.05583413,4.9619797e-7,0.0000043402747,0.00018754469,0.8251171,0.0001527902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98964596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98813426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64256823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036675867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002004664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184374928","doi":"","title":"Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Plaintiff; Complaint; Service (business); Credibility; Freedom of information; Law; Law enforcement; Business; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Conviction; Political science; Information privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.034874594703694556,"score_gpt":0.2925480181742436,"score_spread":0.257673423470549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184374928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82075757,0.000018781508,0.000025051118,0.0032899259,0.000028133507,0.00005054058,2.6686607e-7,0.0000026936864,0.17582706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969882,0.000046081317,0.00010119258,0.0000820933,0.0000058190367,2.968012e-7,1.4366886e-7,3.870553e-7,0.0027758272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999707,0.000022571974,0.00008793906,0.000018055629,0.00012594533,0.000038487375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997287,0.000096457654,0.00004851981,0.0000639144,0.0000437307,0.000018671992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108947366,0.000016329079,0.000037219554,0.000007469995,0.0001301174,0.0000031119855,0.0000928863,0.000016531276,0.000105374806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024067594,0.000009527529,0.000013360008,0.0000675639,0.00018960264,0.0002176207,0.000033013068,0.000017503817,0.0000041719395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007282436,0.00009748313,0.15525833,0.00012795631,0.000013599984,2.2753623e-7,0.24705474,0.000015027002,0.0011039409,0.5232809,0.058896832,0.014078128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012898998,0.000024393803,0.18690524,0.000041991258,0.000009036087,0.000002057188,0.0047780024,0.000033853412,0.0027878422,0.00050233846,0.8047278,0.000058491547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022721943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014256545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74583095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034503853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046217156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9837858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187441579","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p277","title":"Standardization and Development: Brief Discussion on Chinese Quick Transaction Mechanism of Minor Criminal Case","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Minor (academic); Criminal procedure; Political science; Suspect; Database transaction; Criminal justice; Computer science","score_opus":0.043047806521127864,"score_gpt":0.3350958529672758,"score_spread":0.2920480464461479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187441579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886962,0.00013723203,0.007098934,0.0015246974,0.00022931413,0.000055460194,0.000007024756,0.0000034184786,0.002247683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989269,0.000054069467,0.0006918508,0.00008075763,0.00011903055,2.2423556e-7,4.0816866e-7,0.0000034688564,0.00012333025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992515,0.000060825816,0.00022353565,0.00005681887,0.00029641602,0.00011090071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939847,0.000041156713,0.00013875793,0.000031320444,0.00018700382,0.00020331553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000581112,0.000057291312,0.00012726664,0.000043829474,0.00020853803,0.00004164266,0.000034757384,0.000043310196,0.000009779842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072851064,0.000035915276,0.000022221346,0.000037898448,0.00011660843,0.00020468555,0.000006528734,0.00006762271,2.2821128e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019624886,0.00012103468,0.00037126231,0.00012663552,0.00002561958,0.00023369401,0.06528356,0.000026023381,0.00028877737,0.9246817,0.00014945828,0.0084959725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007857299,0.0058126156,0.005482929,0.0018036382,0.0008621831,0.006414408,0.1973581,0.00045036856,0.01564805,0.19392742,0.56305206,0.0013309494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011104402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011313212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7307543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054147302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016374017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16786608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188622380","doi":"","title":"The Etobicoke York Community Council enacts: 1. Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, is amended as follows: A. By inserting in Schedule XXIII (Prohibited Turns) in § 950-1322, the following in","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Schedule; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Operations research; Transport engineering; Computer science; Programming language; Operating system","score_opus":0.07663790383458777,"score_gpt":0.31157416352792366,"score_spread":0.2349362596933359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188622380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662534,0.0015603297,0.0000013271771,0.0076520857,0.00012643394,0.00069846434,0.0000025920863,0.00005429899,0.023651088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996573,0.00039291105,0.00005937151,0.001664029,0.000030125588,0.00010356067,0.0000020335021,0.00001916197,0.0011558074],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964832,0.0010226335,0.00060778623,0.00031927566,0.0007836112,0.0007834901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997601,0.0015775618,0.00015137138,0.00045382808,0.00008431049,0.00013193504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067843217,0.00024599864,0.00032874758,0.00006212985,0.0012139812,0.0004769874,0.00084203563,0.00018576696,0.0001227888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012772987,0.00016363311,0.00009621597,0.0005580958,0.00046973178,0.00057394535,0.00021617407,0.0009767767,0.000031059928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022664169,0.00061231863,0.05319578,0.000063024534,0.00007393804,0.000034125515,0.91062766,0.00013913213,0.0029491829,0.013869992,0.0036152487,0.014592951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033956782,0.00029263747,0.013010555,0.0010085495,0.00005382749,0.000006224007,0.73902565,0.0073282053,0.0005617061,0.0049634045,0.22924466,0.0011088906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24484955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6254629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38061333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043737158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023143036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9337084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191046006","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Original (Non-Delegated) Provincial Jurisdiction to Prosecute Criminal Offences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Business; Law; Criminal law; Criminal jurisdiction; Political science","score_opus":0.014253426626739335,"score_gpt":0.2948680790768284,"score_spread":0.28061465245008904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191046006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96637976,0.0005807372,0.007504219,0.006977386,0.0011057032,0.00047741644,0.0000033292258,0.00012298067,0.016848464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98730695,0.0006178839,0.0005041631,0.00013097335,0.0036203833,0.000018844947,0.0000029425094,0.000020727728,0.0077771023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542904,0.0001808905,0.00041022594,0.00034489087,0.00079423306,0.0028406933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.00005958442,0.00020134528,0.00011707447,0.00026652144,0.00021224552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032442708,0.00020111985,0.00021715021,0.00018613259,0.001618001,0.0003300435,0.0004608278,0.00012515867,0.00007210308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000136127,0.00016818843,0.00013514838,0.0004777943,0.00015513528,0.00076984306,0.000035828303,0.0012794217,0.00017720684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010489197,0.00046869265,0.013891142,0.00006066308,0.00014028304,0.00010296085,0.015119161,0.00015764609,0.004269332,0.71109915,0.013056569,0.24058548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012210711,0.0027371882,0.0061316956,0.00033064393,0.0004386169,0.0008455461,0.04384974,0.000109041954,0.0014870843,0.4052999,0.5361179,0.0014315876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016935814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06325049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52306134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016647684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005299571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191580116","doi":"","title":"The Relevance of Delayed Disclosure to Complainant Credibility in Cases of Sexual Offence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Complaint; Credibility; Relevance (law); Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.0618151556740623,"score_gpt":0.319511505385235,"score_spread":0.25769634971117267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191580116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911634,0.0004164593,0.000047157682,0.00058949983,0.00020381245,0.0002939894,0.00002259148,0.000017782979,0.0072453436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989325,0.000064566964,0.00056800863,0.00006609519,0.000052164687,0.000015441581,7.401005e-7,0.0000059094154,0.00029458778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983466,0.00021389517,0.00041168527,0.00026788304,0.0004238164,0.00033607343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834055,0.0007531479,0.00014601643,0.00043616453,0.0001677247,0.00015641686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015132481,0.000103126236,0.0002298657,0.000022761425,0.00038211799,0.000018664454,0.0005719819,0.00006345796,0.00008915078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017005784,0.0000763357,0.000044500342,0.00031719287,0.0007791537,0.00022336534,0.00010400351,0.00015555377,0.00002242107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013171185,0.00052525615,0.15079956,0.0002088738,0.00003438893,0.00008849076,0.030027306,0.00006210518,0.0050134426,0.80384666,0.0026473294,0.005429462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015168836,0.003899061,0.61393803,0.0012174984,0.00017824964,0.00003043751,0.07298959,0.00012073588,0.032643437,0.06306602,0.20884727,0.0015527855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122593865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38860223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74078065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063764375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012193618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88324887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201014884","doi":"","title":"A Short Note on Plea Agreements in Canadian Antitrust Cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.06266646806627628,"score_gpt":0.37539624624546875,"score_spread":0.31272977817919245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201014884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91614753,0.0004127299,0.0000017762912,0.0018486085,0.00052008464,0.00019373767,0.000013648256,0.00003377835,0.0808281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978977,0.00017562271,0.00003929489,0.0007955068,0.00038785924,0.0000080438695,0.000005465154,0.000012934556,0.00067756826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998081,0.00008291846,0.00017768548,0.00021492112,0.00033937345,0.0011040556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999161,0.00008736834,0.00002768388,0.00021982283,0.00003327979,0.00047085763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006559934,0.00012402562,0.0001505122,0.0001354619,0.00048350022,0.00007265673,0.00026636818,0.000101464524,0.00090196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019879443,0.00012868305,0.00005544767,0.00034884427,0.00016875344,0.00053212955,0.000035232013,0.00015949286,0.0007502124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025642394,0.00016961788,0.92565894,0.00002271545,0.000010198754,0.00015300741,0.0048392205,0.000011718695,0.00015678196,0.044917688,0.012463743,0.011570721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019598113,0.000067504945,0.41577062,0.00008613833,0.00001543832,0.0000071800455,0.0014854704,0.000037015532,0.0005155117,0.000061227416,0.581478,0.00027990117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86450905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95187014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56901425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007903502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005185605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201423329","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North Carolina Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adversary; Criminal justice; Law; Identification (biology); Political science; Psychology; Economic Justice; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.012924781916645959,"score_gpt":0.30627195417558384,"score_spread":0.29334717225893786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201423329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93669444,0.00016803344,0.00008076709,0.0055491724,0.022087513,0.000073606585,0.000014084963,0.000014697359,0.035317667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879813,0.00017789126,0.00051490194,0.00018938283,0.010908959,0.0000010850431,0.0000023803295,0.000005258151,0.00021882232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988277,0.000051392286,0.00029762136,0.00009627813,0.0005912628,0.00013576138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987399,0.00019694443,0.00023136933,0.00006738283,0.00062350044,0.000140878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047915668,0.00007592427,0.00012995418,0.00006860458,0.00028560584,0.000094475094,0.0003241955,0.00007960048,0.00038545465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041178783,0.00006654303,0.00009275719,0.000058871396,0.0003858779,0.0005608019,0.00003890811,0.00034261786,0.000016259477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037325165,0.00008464274,0.10708048,0.0000055090477,0.000105765714,0.00005591535,0.005165603,0.0000186986,0.0006046408,0.88001204,0.0040846555,0.0024088053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065133005,0.00009323476,0.016315142,0.000022745959,0.000045247045,0.000097454315,0.0006135281,0.000012799729,0.00012408925,0.0053542294,0.9765606,0.00010962936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012376307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00936678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044429325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016302612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52268827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202211952","doi":"","title":"The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Too Strong, Too Weak, or Both?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Interpretation (philosophy); Reinterpretation; Cross-examination; Law; Section (typography); Privilege (computing); Admissible evidence; Political science; Charter; Self-incrimination; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01966456986191412,"score_gpt":0.310651484683745,"score_spread":0.29098691482183087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202211952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44805077,0.022356408,0.003548609,0.23294668,0.002530418,0.001194744,0.000006937645,0.00055905315,0.28880638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454891,0.020265026,0.00019622441,0.00038108323,0.002377678,0.000010120133,9.496865e-7,0.000018433368,0.031261392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958279,0.00028888026,0.00034971358,0.00021604293,0.000758342,0.0025591017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989729,0.0002864478,0.0001976175,0.00020933295,0.0001577117,0.00017598059],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043244576,0.00016575835,0.00015444602,0.000052614185,0.002689738,0.00038822056,0.00078681746,0.00010065595,0.00010499941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031886288,0.000110906,0.00013706625,0.0002397443,0.00020406077,0.0007341647,0.000052701216,0.0013079211,0.00012949677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074738695,0.000085569605,0.00025012722,0.000004735048,0.00007225145,0.0000056527438,0.003502703,0.000024178318,0.0000376228,0.809705,0.0090623945,0.17717503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030079889,0.00020981839,0.00026782617,0.000020374326,0.0000628899,0.000093090355,0.021571605,0.00008015364,0.00003806923,0.014364778,0.96277755,0.00021305495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025431934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04069181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95371515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022482823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005026398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202648162","doi":"","title":"Standards of Suspicion","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Enforcement; Reasonable suspicion; Law enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08326140152307351,"score_gpt":0.41846224571745705,"score_spread":0.33520084419438356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202648162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26969638,0.00059733295,0.00028209348,0.008696776,0.0005770506,0.00010061395,0.000017033202,0.000027846541,0.72000486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941471,0.00022986121,0.00012067366,0.000054143668,0.00015629,6.142917e-7,4.029106e-7,0.000003146866,0.0052877394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986957,0.000084061954,0.00015422533,0.00010448304,0.00080147054,0.00016007181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991808,0.00005843087,0.000061737956,0.00011376094,0.00043989383,0.00014535426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013620078,0.000057359128,0.00013052775,0.000023164224,0.000066658286,0.000041302563,0.00015834029,0.00006245892,0.00041510825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041535753,0.0000477537,0.00004690678,0.00015902982,0.00026261958,0.0001616696,0.000041519386,0.000044682587,0.000064044616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014260664,0.00012548099,0.011546156,0.00009555978,0.000016344407,0.0000065379254,0.017259197,0.000011427264,0.00019664216,0.8417206,0.10776012,0.021119362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021210595,0.0003112234,0.0009544385,0.00009290363,0.000030578172,4.811126e-7,0.017540952,0.00002602814,0.0013008196,0.004471025,0.9749511,0.00010838314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073481933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009047465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86719096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000926361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005089198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204721237","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-026","title":"A Thousand and One Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Fantasy; Immigration; Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); Class (philosophy); Criminology; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04230994759335325,"score_gpt":0.2498661968757523,"score_spread":0.20755624928239905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204721237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051119347,0.0022438047,0.000024189823,0.000054127646,0.00006487895,0.00016858954,0.000016668675,0.000034831384,0.9973418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028631275,0.0023753184,0.00021414588,0.000009402646,0.00010647731,5.7839465e-8,0.0000015953503,0.000007089134,0.9944228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924666,0.000028300135,0.000080494305,0.00022033099,0.0002713318,0.00015286265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994372,0.000061266066,0.00012283039,0.00016677052,0.00008492685,0.00012699638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000118819255,0.00012158477,0.00023890685,0.000011376135,0.00037917818,0.000020253001,0.00026014828,0.00022510444,0.0007414325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045235306,0.0001462318,0.000076327524,4.0439554e-7,0.00059664407,0.0001254706,0.000114902956,0.00009381638,0.000004418936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007635541,0.000009392027,0.0000026256996,0.00004344665,0.000059982467,0.000045457426,0.016611114,1.0815797e-7,0.000006505822,0.96886456,0.0039497623,0.01033067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001374882,0.000038428912,0.000015065046,0.00017865532,0.00014060357,9.790813e-7,0.00015366328,5.8873405e-7,0.0000080423215,0.0068223802,0.9923444,0.00015970896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55218107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.513942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012666163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007416269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8118166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204845976","doi":"","title":"The Principle International Human Rights Instruments to Which Canada Has Not Yet Acceded","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Negotiation; Convention; Government (linguistics); Law; Democracy; Law and economics; International human rights law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.019640334525564334,"score_gpt":0.30987673156628337,"score_spread":0.290236397040719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204845976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94177413,0.000059508475,0.00005353786,0.029447457,0.00078821095,0.0001318865,0.0000029783632,0.000017338974,0.027724922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788907,0.0000389408,0.000015797417,0.00013340682,0.0006739913,0.0000051617167,0.0000026632727,0.0000065756835,0.02023275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972573,0.00009924808,0.00024588645,0.00014889384,0.00078274,0.0014659514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994111,0.000063228785,0.0001130326,0.00011275933,0.00018710672,0.00011275057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014480755,0.00009548253,0.00008651007,0.000036848283,0.0034101803,0.0003854904,0.0007756056,0.000039143124,0.0001346527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009589954,0.00007031597,0.00004207512,0.00017181814,0.00007247176,0.00021867268,0.000057628087,0.0006343483,0.000034496064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037506143,0.000026154541,0.0017559144,6.513909e-7,0.00004212314,0.00000363779,0.00022091388,0.000028241298,0.00017284494,0.9884204,0.0066742157,0.0026173792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019999011,0.000051717925,0.0039174305,0.000013095164,0.0000109834,0.000023851953,0.0006173702,0.000007999466,0.00019969404,0.090077154,0.90475535,0.00012537283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78876543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89834327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026961342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005187642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208567640","doi":"","title":"Slipping Through the Gate: Trusting Daubert to Reveal the 'Pseudo-Historian' - Troubling Lessons from Holocaust-Related Trials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; Law; Craft; Nazism; Credibility; German; Supreme court; Nazi Germany; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.08415315685775286,"score_gpt":0.38979413471632646,"score_spread":0.3056409778585736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208567640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4301654,0.0129575515,0.0086125145,0.52441734,0.003539281,0.0010716006,0.000008145206,0.00019612424,0.019032063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891889,0.0022898437,0.00019681916,0.0014106192,0.0029867236,0.000007972676,0.0000019728548,0.00001935461,0.0038977757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399275,0.0015064458,0.00081862224,0.0003511217,0.00079045084,0.0025405972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974531,0.0013973272,0.0005037737,0.00033107432,0.00015997802,0.00015477678],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016170898,0.00023462395,0.00045064883,0.000060401366,0.0038587686,0.00046081777,0.0011575965,0.00016774588,0.00009704858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003631535,0.0001403959,0.00031636207,0.00066293695,0.00018938757,0.00054239586,0.00005102936,0.0025290637,0.000059803308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028717009,0.000073131414,0.0000817919,0.00000255338,0.00026906686,0.000018467903,0.06081092,0.00095236674,0.0018793143,0.8173925,0.0060113994,0.11222128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092033646,0.00037870722,0.0004686148,0.00022755336,0.0004517433,0.00015091314,0.08122819,0.00008128745,0.000094869974,0.7179534,0.19753897,0.00050545053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075973147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074434383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5590235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015978817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002510339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211030804","doi":"","title":"Negotiation, Mediation, Globalization Protests and Police: Right Processes; Wrong System, Issues, Parties and Time","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Globalization; Political science; Government (linguistics); Mediation; Summit; Negotiation; Political dissent; Law; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy","score_opus":0.007413245696545718,"score_gpt":0.27626401348668383,"score_spread":0.2688507677901381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211030804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86333686,0.07809933,0.008456376,0.021245634,0.0006740557,0.0019576699,0.0000066895504,0.0003779093,0.02584547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926873,0.00530212,0.000056720208,0.00003533334,0.0003081022,0.000009677117,0.0000019860013,0.000008641754,0.001590124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809957,0.0002497046,0.00022480545,0.00016286208,0.0003592354,0.0009038016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993082,0.00006027174,0.0001701464,0.000060655966,0.0002802389,0.00012043438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019832132,0.00010383735,0.00012910638,0.0000523607,0.0009254127,0.0002245444,0.000098769335,0.000076016215,0.000028946937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050591683,0.00009206467,0.000016342074,0.00026681434,0.00012541823,0.0006485013,0.000010082215,0.0002524467,0.000015720223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014302206,0.000022601613,0.0117665585,0.0000899975,0.00003104915,0.0000010668895,0.007531661,0.0000106148,0.000053743453,0.9791405,0.000522035,0.0008158352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021872432,0.0009233045,0.009611921,0.0007424773,0.00042379735,0.0015369131,0.10001401,0.0003898785,0.00084159436,0.64436156,0.23740695,0.0015603735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014944691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010760408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.334779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048343526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019686834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71176195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221225313","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-78845-4_7","title":"What is in a Clause?","year":2012,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Medizinrecht, Gesundheitsrecht und Bioethik der Universitäten Heidelberg und Mannheim","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Université de Montréal; Canada Research Chairs; Division of Materials Research; Génome Québec","keywords":"Dependent clause; Non-finite clause; Linguistics; Establishment Clause; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; First amendment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.09850979620492568,"score_gpt":0.35951739711179725,"score_spread":0.2610076009068716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221225313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014475901,0.5791877,0.00086672534,0.024131715,0.021686992,0.004521946,0.0010608544,0.0009926,0.35307556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117854945,0.6218757,0.0052869534,0.006455628,0.0058971145,0.00010962302,0.0017574105,0.00085543614,0.23990718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836844,0.0012166159,0.0032287869,0.003884624,0.004463893,0.0035216466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891005,0.002192334,0.0023349784,0.0021462797,0.0020453103,0.0021805842],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003776397,0.0032843235,0.0027010427,0.0030134788,0.0023979594,0.0020249225,0.0055027087,0.003388687,0.0039277044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008053301,0.0036081772,0.0016707826,0.0017205719,0.0073475833,0.010701103,0.0027173618,0.0043034293,0.006973405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019343379,0.0020438796,0.0036382452,0.0015555938,0.0190724,0.0027310501,0.03854106,0.00014349743,0.00080368156,0.77931327,0.019959623,0.13026337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022526442,0.00047362444,0.0008554858,0.0055405153,0.0070022694,0.00008566104,0.0037947902,0.00013323965,0.0011152882,0.0070033353,0.9679676,0.0037755303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009413166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03356709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039423513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002191519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215040816","doi":"","title":"The Operational Realities of the Charter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Harm; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Permission; Population; Law and economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.02119631511834286,"score_gpt":0.3062490135462332,"score_spread":0.2850526984278903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215040816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.758986,0.01932723,0.0006055942,0.14074378,0.002579548,0.0003001832,0.000003828448,0.000023886343,0.077429995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988706,0.0027759871,0.0000049126393,0.00012245853,0.0008083912,0.0000019589932,1.1322946e-7,0.0000027852318,0.007577421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833167,0.0001882509,0.00012063575,0.000033769742,0.00033019093,0.0009954867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962413,0.000115594245,0.000070265356,0.00007935478,0.00007183933,0.000038824706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033263138,0.00003843174,0.000045037297,0.000008221056,0.0012974264,0.000051765695,0.00030825564,0.000024307888,0.000045872566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001482053,0.00001923045,0.00006491215,0.00006708658,0.0002323101,0.00023714949,0.000020238962,0.00042807165,0.000010831491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000560981,0.0000077427185,0.003002637,5.0257853e-7,0.000011497286,1.8668858e-8,0.0031670164,6.53144e-7,0.000039490144,0.9903423,0.0008133701,0.0026091624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011510537,0.00005491607,0.008884892,0.000019907704,0.000029925339,0.00006091364,0.05242527,0.000003453803,0.00017242513,0.36203572,0.57610226,0.00009520504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007134033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073507526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62830657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022028587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012912444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221552570","doi":"","title":"Kwiatkowski : Privacy Protection and Risk Analysis: Losing the Forest in the Telephoto Shots of the Trees","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Supreme court; Normative; Entitlement (fair division); Sight; Law; Balance (ability); Business; Law and economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02221279542262649,"score_gpt":0.2856049322414753,"score_spread":0.2633921368188488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221552570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99161124,0.00019429157,0.000031190993,0.0040659457,0.00014393474,0.0005401664,0.0000040673767,0.00001543383,0.0033937327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993129,0.00009243836,0.000058509442,0.00016096617,0.0001729815,0.000048773236,4.1282635e-7,0.000005161341,0.00014787864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984532,0.0004691343,0.00021781995,0.00019990989,0.00042617868,0.00023377218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989771,0.000298218,0.00016423913,0.00044980823,0.000058441412,0.00005216661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020890539,0.00009795982,0.00014787482,0.000040082297,0.0010026033,0.00019149332,0.0006350982,0.000085317646,0.000058059424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075600063,0.000048153754,0.00012118172,0.0007613404,0.00057962514,0.0002627879,0.0000819428,0.0005062662,0.0000062710906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000613922,0.0001281776,0.8766846,0.000027656088,0.00012699144,0.000003249274,0.028861577,0.00021612612,0.0026314275,0.0846623,0.00034903956,0.006247459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017608682,0.00004120222,0.9290663,0.00004958227,0.00034855225,0.00000294855,0.006493275,0.00020865732,0.0007038516,0.009531966,0.053232044,0.00014554342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09012664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6703911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58026445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023808176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068000605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9159323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217361879","doi":"","title":"Rights-vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Charter; Legislation; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Publishing; Obligation; Bill of rights; Public administration; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03275547374255387,"score_gpt":0.3047101050061511,"score_spread":0.2719546312635972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217361879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73644984,0.00043316602,0.000026336873,0.25297803,0.00045995822,0.00005293206,0.0000046560817,0.0000056860404,0.009589422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96873766,0.00033193117,0.00018557427,0.0011329553,0.0008720566,2.8878404e-7,0.0000016120448,0.0000042769334,0.02873363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987664,0.000065094326,0.00035465055,0.00011505449,0.00047424156,0.00022456235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990803,0.00020845993,0.00018020914,0.00004123741,0.00010931826,0.0003804666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051486865,0.00010301314,0.00021244159,0.00008890784,0.00014645411,0.00021651055,0.00020629358,0.000052505053,0.00021463078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016332598,0.00007231107,0.000042309497,0.00004509696,0.00008055726,0.0006251403,0.00003894725,0.00018892922,9.3019383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005073483,0.000072834635,0.5984774,0.0000043398086,0.000083862644,0.000038509217,0.0025461244,0.000010398976,0.000020667356,0.22975576,0.14384007,0.025099251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070401974,0.000039337167,0.11188284,0.000040623738,0.000011281909,0.000029370882,0.00022429638,0.000023766184,0.000007746998,0.006580982,0.88036704,0.00008868084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62344754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9493472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73652697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016860789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000565796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37905997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218554148","doi":"","title":"Enforcing the Right to Reasonableness in Social Rights Litigation: The Canadian Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Entitlement (fair division); Political science; Human rights; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Enforcement; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Social rights; Economics","score_opus":0.015397517568409463,"score_gpt":0.2941811052310584,"score_spread":0.27878358766264894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218554148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.820282,0.00056234683,0.00013357359,0.131553,0.0003778607,0.00045359475,6.550729e-7,0.000017202005,0.046619765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952382,0.00010353978,0.000008968367,0.0007982572,0.0008526598,0.00004307365,3.000909e-7,0.000005169419,0.0029498418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970222,0.00025667102,0.00018751963,0.00013471424,0.00042596343,0.0019729484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939424,0.00012461885,0.00006480355,0.00011062369,0.0001336758,0.00017204016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025138962,0.00008933841,0.00009106366,0.000060246948,0.004986585,0.00041562933,0.0006951964,0.000064841355,0.0003085192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013629052,0.000050998064,0.000053402124,0.00042058373,0.00022757586,0.00047373,0.000022890757,0.0008970553,0.00010560719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004210393,0.0000048825664,0.0008678667,6.9137286e-7,0.0000062441763,0.000002905964,0.03743721,0.000012668951,0.000013764877,0.9564161,0.0011162166,0.0041172937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012053405,0.000042819258,0.0071213106,0.000036147227,0.000010545447,0.000054662745,0.06358177,0.00002773676,0.00006248127,0.6445175,0.2842229,0.00020161514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75479186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31189856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021083448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044586193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220102439","doi":"","title":"A Comparison of the Impact of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms on Judicial Review of Administrative Action","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Law; Bill of rights; Publishing; Political science; Judicial review; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights","score_opus":0.08819755292381076,"score_gpt":0.3964468918595072,"score_spread":0.30824933893569645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220102439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95123726,0.0023072318,0.000005472441,0.026453428,0.0004004449,0.00030633507,0.00004980404,0.0000010964678,0.019238902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984312,0.0007578999,0.000012776163,0.00007895514,0.00011304562,3.72082e-7,7.80375e-7,0.000002183657,0.00060276524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986144,0.00025942008,0.0004978675,0.00007494056,0.0004469892,0.00010642548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824154,0.00024441298,0.00092180195,0.00008525092,0.00036530106,0.00014167588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009026323,0.00008509508,0.00034702953,0.000062665684,0.0001479148,0.000028490103,0.00024062411,0.000056198573,0.00011178033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022630469,0.000034658246,0.00014127792,0.00012310641,0.0007556439,0.0002187431,0.000016936136,0.0001534863,7.704829e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008522183,0.00036029628,0.14262858,0.00016543685,0.00071164704,0.0000016348083,0.018625645,0.000008271922,0.00044434617,0.7600497,0.0728891,0.0032631462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00723595,0.003057727,0.4259647,0.007444619,0.000604126,0.00015832263,0.001525032,0.00006702536,0.005889366,0.20081545,0.3468674,0.00037024837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28380537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23710456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5592342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004469203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006884983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7768163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222141872","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the Avenues of Redress: The Post-Conviction Review Process in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Redress; Appeal; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Commit; Prison; Criminal code; Criminology; Statutory law; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.040148865371233765,"score_gpt":0.3479604715189953,"score_spread":0.30781160614776154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222141872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005489112,0.9294268,9.004576e-7,0.022929817,0.00026547047,0.0010079584,0.000020559648,0.000007313093,0.04085206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5647193,0.43365026,0.0000012768085,0.0015319184,0.000038085946,0.000038112456,0.0000049949003,0.0000031350064,0.000012882939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986263,0.00023633786,0.00044688198,0.00013446814,0.00039180767,0.00016420241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990414,0.00010555427,0.0002770188,0.00019144309,0.00030268237,0.00008192574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019953195,0.00009857655,0.0003773458,0.000008530436,0.00020412615,0.000013360118,0.00021364524,0.000022223248,0.000011667669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018795357,0.000050251914,0.000047128593,0.00021128904,0.00076195534,0.00018867965,0.000043908272,0.00014403048,8.97904e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028968985,0.000026325632,0.00039067472,0.017307557,0.000013834632,6.2023724e-7,0.0025858218,2.1029828e-7,4.7458397e-7,0.9622946,0.0012925554,0.016058365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025086553,0.000030041121,0.00028312916,0.026051007,0.000117966454,0.0000057874604,0.0016471557,0.0000029554512,0.0000074457935,0.0014618672,0.9700555,0.00008623546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80141026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8859579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001111583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005077932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28074563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224111528","doi":"","title":"Au Revoir, Monsieur Big? Confessions, Coercion, and the Courts","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Appeal; Suspect; Coercion (linguistics); Criminology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020644478027684664,"score_gpt":0.29218211667508354,"score_spread":0.2715376386473989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224111528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17827617,0.15518703,0.0026829715,0.6534514,0.0034616555,0.000289331,0.000007166189,0.00002744547,0.0066168862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7592674,0.17977042,0.00001166931,0.00042014883,0.0016324641,0.0000042036227,1.8793429e-7,0.000014029948,0.05887946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492836,0.0010702875,0.00039986926,0.00026260002,0.0005296797,0.002809188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812925,0.0009219235,0.00028530433,0.00020618174,0.00019496933,0.0002623906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007973155,0.00020778769,0.00029883746,0.000049023245,0.001858964,0.00011964953,0.00044456558,0.00016822177,0.00018005798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072257494,0.00010858095,0.00015957815,0.00017363938,0.0022560365,0.000410029,0.000086650674,0.001357446,0.00015689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013208682,0.000029937786,0.00092817214,0.00000717187,0.00006396561,0.00000774953,0.0023835837,3.2493674e-7,0.000051864452,0.8196368,0.0047549186,0.17200342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013236976,0.00015895885,0.00049055566,0.0004130057,0.0001712117,0.0006694864,0.010380861,0.00000841158,0.000016137608,0.55321836,0.4329493,0.00020001775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004459162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020545237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65303123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012817726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005910003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225290797","doi":"","title":"Commentary on \"Prosecutions, Politics and the Public Interest: Some Recent Developments in the United Kingdom, Canada and Elsewhere\"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kingdom; Politics; Political science; Public interest; Law","score_opus":0.07549714640242551,"score_gpt":0.3246354857830783,"score_spread":0.24913833938065283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225290797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7066031,0.000019188987,6.1662246e-7,0.2912317,0.00016494785,0.00013749041,0.0000022837987,0.000005751292,0.0018349176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664251,0.0001634576,0.0000343997,0.03318043,0.000054023316,0.000009901517,0.000004509896,0.000002344621,0.00012580985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915576,0.0002021621,0.0001165949,0.0001015891,0.00020419204,0.00021967675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929273,0.00046264453,0.000027413222,0.00010552731,0.000036823498,0.00007483083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000839724,0.00006274145,0.00006382786,0.000036517908,0.00058634294,0.00015095097,0.00022204508,0.000031941807,0.000043184464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024841574,0.00003413799,0.000006761458,0.00016423073,0.00041866823,0.0001115118,0.00006208207,0.00022050904,0.0000010773224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009184898,0.000021382519,0.010195257,0.0000031559337,0.0000048435054,0.0000035236806,0.002793925,5.2151243e-8,0.0000041806993,0.96381813,0.021800343,0.0013459908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027733954,0.000010509295,0.011659559,0.000013765199,0.000004891147,0.0000030214933,0.0075522605,0.000011230418,0.000011396644,0.0044568693,0.97592854,0.00007061093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87971556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008142771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023540859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4509735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226649503","doi":"","title":"The Unfinished Project of Roncarelli: Justiciability, Discretion and the Limits of the Rule of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Justiciability; Economic Justice; Political question; Power (physics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018979670868941725,"score_gpt":0.32012134387680236,"score_spread":0.30114167300786066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226649503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97762996,0.0014266082,0.00011401626,0.012905022,0.000329618,0.00032351402,0.000002613195,0.0000041896183,0.00726443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757713,0.001985076,0.00001355485,0.000020483856,0.00010444845,0.000002841884,9.4077855e-8,0.00000401871,0.00029236937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832207,0.00036645727,0.0002825081,0.000080839825,0.00040537494,0.00054277043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866235,0.00063986157,0.0003100486,0.00018827169,0.00017704336,0.000022395745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005557143,0.0000630327,0.00014309058,0.000012246448,0.0006759492,0.000033170254,0.0004935784,0.00005567401,0.0000073520164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069395953,0.000027615306,0.00011400587,0.00014163084,0.0020250275,0.000097258744,0.0000398767,0.0008229729,2.964235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009701613,0.00002173416,0.00074712525,0.000010346474,0.000022241458,3.43463e-8,0.0042324928,0.0000028524837,0.00090258115,0.9894839,0.000010513127,0.0044691744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009920319,0.00039215904,0.0057741283,0.00010915,0.00033929574,0.000039086706,0.040271226,0.0000972494,0.004760591,0.93101895,0.016047835,0.0001583224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005016295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055452034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058464967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055762375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00133285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9617835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227705386","doi":"","title":"The Governor General opens national conference on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Governor; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08110723644788768,"score_gpt":0.33488453670754303,"score_spread":0.25377730025965534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227705386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17938298,0.0000118699745,0.0000033512808,0.074317835,0.0001669945,0.00011090677,0.000010394726,0.0000044369713,0.74599123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98126984,0.000007073969,0.000018397035,0.00070450385,0.00022896075,0.0000031786913,3.11404e-7,0.0000010398055,0.01776672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994057,0.00005158698,0.000058974358,0.00007250774,0.00027775986,0.0001335049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948466,0.00015151122,0.000023024559,0.000068787136,0.0002006614,0.00007135037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046530314,0.000033747274,0.000035467787,0.00000823325,0.0012133807,0.00010528579,0.00020000471,0.000024648609,0.00061420375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091091875,0.000015884147,0.000011083204,0.000047495625,0.0008964802,0.00006463726,0.0000146074335,0.000037730744,0.000056439225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025896345,0.0000019397544,0.00014155758,2.204453e-7,0.0000025354295,1.6946278e-7,0.0014456885,3.2350346e-8,0.000029767412,0.9554457,0.042790875,0.0001389302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066650675,0.000068866044,0.00953764,0.0000129615855,0.0000050871568,7.3959535e-7,0.0011469376,0.00024536252,0.00031567377,0.0709479,0.9175718,0.00008039848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7584521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99008834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8844978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004440868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029758172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93324655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228131771","doi":"","title":"'Pulling the Patches' on the Patchwork Defence of Duress: A Comment on R. v. Aravena","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Harmonization; Political science; Criminal law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0652323083463739,"score_gpt":0.31699781750507977,"score_spread":0.2517655091587059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228131771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6713953,0.0035885868,0.001087828,0.30570465,0.0006713238,0.00043562113,0.0000023862663,0.000032481385,0.017081833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99525964,0.0018947277,0.0000092574255,0.0020474533,0.00039803158,0.000006611124,2.0639453e-7,0.000007998928,0.00037609003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972182,0.0004850278,0.00022401827,0.00012509477,0.0007631899,0.0011845062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987722,0.00058731186,0.00020360362,0.0002208216,0.00011735886,0.00009869176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066618556,0.000107225605,0.00012919743,0.00002618573,0.0008106289,0.000077947654,0.0006931441,0.00005126912,0.000023241948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005224697,0.000055901393,0.00010826805,0.00019353206,0.00023706921,0.000077206736,0.000032242995,0.001314867,0.000038409853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014478654,0.000084639374,0.00083014194,0.0000023323244,0.000043226566,0.0000029570613,0.011521076,0.00024084645,0.000020485668,0.9759495,0.004665242,0.0064947675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039420955,0.001159341,0.000349716,0.0003110716,0.000068838934,0.000036763595,0.13693742,0.000056384688,0.00034715695,0.71697414,0.14312685,0.00023810222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019228345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004663305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32386434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005935873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015626344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62347835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229581093","doi":"","title":"The Pluralism of the Charter: Revisiting the Oakes Test","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Substantive due process; Substantive rights; Fundamental rights; Declaration; Democracy; Human rights; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.012328739375110049,"score_gpt":0.2889855904866441,"score_spread":0.27665685111153404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229581093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36328533,0.016810277,0.000086132444,0.5948048,0.00053821586,0.000328018,0.0000014834886,0.000032441574,0.024113275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98965,0.005964185,0.0000030477743,0.00036739776,0.0010572616,0.0000010353873,5.868812e-8,0.0000037847751,0.0029532185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978776,0.00024714097,0.00021331893,0.00007976291,0.0004277558,0.0011544002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990084,0.00046518387,0.00021005185,0.00018442268,0.000095849435,0.000036050697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043861805,0.00007220208,0.00008663432,0.000010767115,0.002515871,0.00014609276,0.0008475103,0.000033086075,0.000014924741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007325757,0.00003073753,0.00013712587,0.00019131575,0.00027199832,0.00014182806,0.000022683806,0.00092887454,0.000008462939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008778645,0.000008943177,0.0011306442,0.0000011313027,0.00001571549,5.626755e-7,0.0035671564,0.000002713106,0.00038372874,0.8557034,0.0005074861,0.13866974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023917915,0.00025097778,0.015514476,0.00018692543,0.000097446384,0.00018782851,0.05068319,0.000025824878,0.0002639624,0.5728856,0.359453,0.00021165285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036905127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029686214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6263647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021715151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094187696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230176755","doi":"","title":"THE DEFENCE COUNSELS ETHICS IN PLEA BARGAINING:LOSING SIGHT OF THE INNOCENT?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Negotiation; Surrender; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.20871199877432872,"score_gpt":0.4047578393578987,"score_spread":0.19604584058357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230176755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4840007,0.0012919573,0.00029722572,0.06638722,0.00090796297,0.0003894363,0.000001874143,0.000051622337,0.446672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997776,0.00016665684,0.00008800268,0.0005629879,0.000052192117,0.0000024639914,8.854915e-8,0.0000030827816,0.001348579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985366,0.00036301417,0.0001764247,0.000102289916,0.0006009038,0.00022075837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984049,0.0010920796,0.0000720859,0.00017401931,0.00019803163,0.00005886529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036145672,0.000051985226,0.00007534884,0.0000129038945,0.00048785013,0.000069239446,0.00050067157,0.00007930051,0.000020602758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025839387,0.000027775854,0.000030691328,0.00036324016,0.0006061315,0.00014976283,0.00006348761,0.00026646967,0.000011748011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002334992,0.000026452717,0.023151634,0.0000076204706,0.0000038201033,0.0000017765343,0.118084915,0.000057523717,0.00018568675,0.85285616,0.0037282174,0.0018728405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003691613,0.00007549858,0.008415892,0.00030544063,0.00002337581,0.0000024874062,0.15761764,0.00034109442,0.0029124739,0.12575094,0.7038811,0.0003049165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075915754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027883513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7271052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006848727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060221436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231620613","doi":"","title":"Anchoring the Law in a Bed of Principle: A Critique of, and Proposal to Improve, American and Canadian Confrontation and Hearsay Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Confrontation Clause; Admissible evidence; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Common law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.012052283138683005,"score_gpt":0.323288714775776,"score_spread":0.31123643163709297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231620613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99165636,0.0013497124,0.000033395507,0.005862189,0.00003018554,0.0001591044,0.0000017264682,0.0000019683646,0.0009053277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988844,0.00073392695,0.000117750795,0.00014328302,0.000080158476,0.0000037940972,1.1969546e-7,0.000003816224,0.00003277465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988426,0.000114174,0.00013501265,0.00007385876,0.00011559835,0.00071872986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963284,0.000057900572,0.0000650156,0.00004066956,0.000046868005,0.00015668655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017803198,0.000050371393,0.00011014426,0.000039077153,0.00021370687,0.000032215463,0.00006310677,0.000023595769,0.000001724673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007207221,0.00003977823,0.0000108594695,0.00009570635,0.00035657827,0.00022763826,0.000015544128,0.0002868919,1.1529979e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021817505,0.0000088833785,0.014021512,0.0000084572475,0.0000075624184,4.1257073e-7,0.008822529,3.3285443e-7,0.00094227324,0.9691486,0.000002547664,0.007015117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026083842,0.00435732,0.26814348,0.00062226807,0.00026185153,0.00049924507,0.30915657,0.000109725435,0.005019691,0.34058192,0.06744217,0.0011973617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6065863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96548414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6285666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020396554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009583064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39603353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231804219","doi":"","title":"Destruction of Documents Before Proceedings Commence: What is a Court to Do?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Contempt; Fair trial; Test (biology); Discretion; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Human rights","score_opus":0.019560513640293545,"score_gpt":0.31006258907944195,"score_spread":0.2905020754391484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231804219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512791,0.0004018696,0.00003279586,0.008534648,0.00073403283,0.00049350195,0.0000047521376,0.000061373255,0.0384579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949992,0.00020204029,0.0014265565,0.0014324174,0.00014295438,0.000029165629,9.0242594e-7,0.000010976714,0.0017558215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843514,0.00005017368,0.00025405755,0.0002848762,0.0006019417,0.00037381556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999111,0.00003330268,0.000111634385,0.00015467001,0.0002816706,0.00030770467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007456267,0.00012701732,0.00018890708,0.000045331686,0.00047242237,0.0003739798,0.00030799603,0.000101807884,0.00078605645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002209434,0.00012493301,0.00006978992,0.00037289245,0.00022474793,0.001665002,0.000041852385,0.00014303718,0.00019084192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047823403,0.00008784863,0.026929911,0.00008759705,0.000024159066,0.000003697825,0.02065674,0.0000026786277,0.00068659044,0.92454803,0.021321416,0.005603506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037234268,0.0002765372,0.0032932744,0.0005537112,0.000049827722,0.000008788902,0.027988702,0.0000022236302,0.0052087824,0.047176167,0.91473645,0.00033322148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004155663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018446781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89341503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016648269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010719109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8606767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231866243","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Subject Guides at Cambrian College. Law & Legislation. Books.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Legislation; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06725198866164864,"score_gpt":0.31777618992205303,"score_spread":0.2505242012604044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231866243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027259483,0.003747745,0.000021587897,0.0044459733,0.0033471608,0.0007889154,0.00023309911,0.00053903664,0.9866039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019297583,0.0024888362,0.0014278004,0.0033058678,0.0037273162,0.00007958126,0.00014416118,0.0001131974,0.96941566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532264,0.00043826798,0.0009478126,0.00093736796,0.0012665375,0.0010873476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710196,0.0006618011,0.00046363097,0.0008262246,0.0004798303,0.00046654494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016645631,0.00059257296,0.00081617135,0.00019984928,0.002173835,0.00031426107,0.001402992,0.00089087465,0.010807621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065725774,0.0005534698,0.000457595,0.00035292204,0.0014077865,0.0007622218,0.00037807514,0.00043836987,0.0019389907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023509043,0.000020268837,0.000111393405,0.000047008903,0.00003945909,0.00003062084,0.0019300496,3.1819548e-7,0.000006041131,0.3730536,0.62448454,0.0002531535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015558736,0.000076263634,0.00011129328,0.00028908803,0.00015165593,0.000010708358,0.0019323315,0.0000015352174,0.00015262065,0.005529426,0.99084955,0.0007399351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2201791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4579951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3675242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066473015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012105831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W223269129","doi":"","title":"R. v. Gomboc : Considering the Proper Role of the 'Biographic Core' in a Section 8 Informational Privacy Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Determinative; Plaintiff; Element (criminal law); Core (optical fiber); Meaning (existential); Law; Internet privacy; Charter; Section (typography); Personally identifiable information; Test (biology); Political science; Petitioner; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Advertising; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03345552542870135,"score_gpt":0.27004442504336956,"score_spread":0.23658889961466822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W223269129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944287,0.0007563142,0.00020042568,0.0008422193,0.00009128383,0.00013204108,5.333316e-7,0.0000075144167,0.0035409632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905634,0.00067633187,0.00001490216,0.000037041777,0.000075900854,0.00000458231,2.3046853e-7,0.0000028362617,0.00013186401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985771,0.00011075041,0.0002525815,0.000068670284,0.00033663763,0.00065421965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950963,0.000052884156,0.00019078926,0.00011724444,0.000100098456,0.000029338893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023922257,0.000061237886,0.00010313002,0.00014749142,0.0004830137,0.000031332904,0.00036003976,0.000043799624,0.00006681727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014314956,0.00003447577,0.0001630208,0.0010317571,0.00027490186,0.00030431693,0.00003934539,0.00070727064,0.000002557158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052048803,0.0000634813,0.37549856,0.000004936499,0.00034284816,4.5049305e-7,0.049464017,0.00012673422,0.0003113162,0.5694838,0.000022815966,0.0046289773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040190993,0.00016978924,0.3962513,0.0000700143,0.0004992082,0.00007226465,0.09084488,0.00077462185,0.0002269868,0.50339466,0.007045738,0.00024861665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047750864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05696086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06608912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022502235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012165018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96024716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234091314","doi":"","title":"Textual Regulation of Child Welfare: A Critique of the Ontario Risk Assessment Model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Risk assessment; Economics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020881249759436595,"score_gpt":0.31001753731631926,"score_spread":0.28913628755688264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234091314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20918475,0.003115477,0.00006077249,0.24226315,0.00030414597,0.002156338,0.0016765944,0.000028503457,0.5412103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934424,0.0021989327,0.00018476526,0.0024035838,0.0003466302,0.00004087465,0.000012121377,0.000024623958,0.0013460428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691385,0.00087658816,0.00073840865,0.00025217538,0.00024541141,0.0009735613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751985,0.000085806045,0.0007080459,0.0003352144,0.0007072014,0.00064389093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022725428,0.0002013889,0.000650824,0.00016866287,0.0011066064,0.000017458144,0.0005371054,0.0002710268,0.00030228106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028942903,0.00021336522,0.00044884105,0.0007322722,0.0009142569,0.00015838255,0.000027195398,0.00039590517,8.175348e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016271761,0.000019284993,0.0014461926,0.0011455998,0.000029246943,0.0000010974314,0.015108033,0.000010217223,0.000010180871,0.9793319,0.002008703,0.00088793115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041841387,0.00007973719,0.12234916,0.005344305,0.00047554445,0.000015968779,0.014204503,0.000023631817,0.00019068386,0.08554036,0.7706368,0.0007209112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98973644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053261044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016388074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234102304","doi":"","title":"Future of Administrative Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Economic Justice; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Public administration; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.15010953640951769,"score_gpt":0.4080569052022564,"score_spread":0.2579473687927387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234102304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1788911,0.00017663772,0.00011935499,0.0065796417,0.00027416638,0.00005569403,0.0000014253276,0.00002733195,0.81387466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891009,0.00020437165,0.0006674917,0.00012279412,0.00029013093,8.435677e-7,2.0237101e-7,0.0000010232203,0.009612257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999623,0.000029251807,0.000060370232,0.000054800326,0.00015169356,0.000080908954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997572,0.000068519934,0.00002234502,0.000047851347,0.000059501355,0.000044594293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010005756,0.00002484684,0.00004908643,0.000007992817,0.00020778087,0.000003429603,0.00008512934,0.000027436223,0.0006071781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006008071,0.000020410458,0.000022179172,0.000083135536,0.00020898311,0.00008657897,0.000006893254,0.000029558369,0.00003386764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018361494,0.000040686846,0.0011451899,0.000016258755,0.00000395025,0.000017342636,0.033160366,5.2443943e-7,0.00013687863,0.92696154,0.03648871,0.0020101857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082664854,0.0001026882,0.007909372,0.000011654523,0.000032218974,0.000006613467,0.08982134,0.0000026639946,0.0015314546,0.0014881025,0.89890313,0.00010807993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009196454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014140666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92547345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008144747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012906519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6648174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234217147","doi":"","title":"Enhancing the Enhancements? Section 146 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the Supreme Court of Canada: A Comment on R. v. L.T.H.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01920899303693628,"score_gpt":0.27753711767691563,"score_spread":0.25832812463997934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234217147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92952394,0.0012755373,0.0005351196,0.0637621,0.0005544154,0.00030348313,0.0000024826536,0.000004939419,0.0040380047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967489,0.0014488712,0.0000036404188,0.0011855484,0.00027099616,0.0000011105572,1.8321212e-7,0.0000035259834,0.0003372012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977936,0.00038798447,0.0002769658,0.00009856175,0.00065476174,0.00078811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912554,0.0002747173,0.00029238415,0.0001472746,0.00011745678,0.000042631345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039501837,0.00009212217,0.00014632668,0.000018151839,0.0011545514,0.000035742498,0.00039286265,0.000033131473,0.000013609682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027911604,0.000045361125,0.00007298898,0.00013660082,0.00025527846,0.000089001835,0.000025153042,0.00078424107,2.2059858e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015269519,0.00021134935,0.00048111452,0.00005897403,0.00024228748,0.000001682203,0.116307765,0.0002055604,0.0030903923,0.861958,0.002520658,0.0133952545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030196116,0.0020153215,0.009853908,0.00067572866,0.0024928602,0.00013302625,0.8747642,0.00012342258,0.01549078,0.074307166,0.016632158,0.0004918209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14801946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64606756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7876508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006759185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003104306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235689524","doi":"","title":"Criminalizing Sex at the Margins","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Imprisonment; Criminal code; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sexual intercourse; Nullification; Criminal law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.06133462864017296,"score_gpt":0.31027403355647554,"score_spread":0.24893940491630256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235689524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69424623,0.008381168,0.0015260637,0.012200347,0.0007382452,0.00021988535,0.0000010782024,0.000076215205,0.28261074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647695,0.0044808276,0.000034627497,0.0002452894,0.0004501339,0.000002938935,2.3681189e-7,0.000010004921,0.030006463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997178,0.00021494317,0.0001587491,0.00013066313,0.0003699012,0.0019477153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995224,0.00007953403,0.00009686094,0.00014027028,0.000060319082,0.0001006324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034390353,0.00009007383,0.00009439731,0.00003273966,0.0017423527,0.000065676475,0.0004875595,0.000052132826,0.00074045226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011060357,0.000061728315,0.00010608456,0.00012346852,0.0002475352,0.0002245616,0.00005730256,0.0008797326,0.00020053789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005388488,0.000036313246,0.0036118263,0.0000031796976,0.00005079784,0.0000131201605,0.03431464,9.124075e-7,0.00012429728,0.93542624,0.0022998983,0.024064872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023461336,0.00023813969,0.0026343737,0.000030736053,0.00012107963,0.0004737162,0.15047283,0.000005128805,0.0003179767,0.4374688,0.40770727,0.00029533732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053641815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05874642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49795747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009938832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013576361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2238444062","doi":"10.71781/2085","title":"L'utilisation du domaine de la preuve par la Cour suprême du Canada dans la détermination des droits économiques des Autochtones conformément à ses propres valeurs","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04295335503482812,"score_gpt":0.3339635280718605,"score_spread":0.2910101730370324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238444062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94015783,0.00032213773,0.0001034438,0.0004528414,0.00028085822,0.0010379702,0.00011127572,0.000009508136,0.05752416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809096,0.0021870127,0.0017992371,0.00002487027,0.00022653217,0.00018304372,0.00034092527,0.00003507498,0.014293696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967744,0.0010740166,0.0005973145,0.0005574455,0.000475774,0.00052109046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973519,0.0013058614,0.00050062063,0.00021882664,0.0003664717,0.0002563432],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016697595,0.00043022647,0.00047021464,0.00007821553,0.0017411163,0.00078799285,0.0008276695,0.0004361635,0.0003919602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007204753,0.0004406553,0.00010653187,0.00020288973,0.0018510048,0.001435757,0.000106027255,0.00026367142,0.00002315593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054624357,0.0006535818,0.11012384,0.0007497485,0.0002829991,0.0006182438,0.66052514,0.00074689003,0.0020961964,0.030871797,0.002911677,0.18987362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011318497,0.00044504474,0.345071,0.0025045495,0.0007595542,0.00043909578,0.15425196,0.0020924672,0.03301185,0.005357845,0.4532506,0.001684183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8285471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9371986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5062732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014468493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004353085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241033841","doi":"","title":"Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04554061431224795,"score_gpt":0.3190094333473102,"score_spread":0.27346881903506226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241033841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6143648,0.000037560425,0.000035600588,0.001336584,0.0003439474,0.00021416141,3.8082194e-7,0.000016143917,0.38365084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98606676,0.000001483806,0.000029883442,0.00007172272,0.00012068938,0.0000071737927,4.6312294e-7,0.0000025748734,0.013699277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985184,0.0003045453,0.00030859467,0.00013120362,0.0005750744,0.00016216324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917674,0.00029048166,0.000144552,0.00030624267,0.000059475962,0.000022499085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017208854,0.00006688859,0.000117008625,0.000021945136,0.00038096312,0.00003833519,0.00041769212,0.00005679015,0.00003573162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012118474,0.000033160173,0.00006219163,0.00015568628,0.00011465769,0.000068608926,0.000028930048,0.00014480492,0.00001352471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080194295,0.00019125162,0.020214137,0.0007477093,0.000005102332,0.00031970875,0.06351413,0.00024685694,0.00037440227,0.89380515,0.020002216,0.0004991666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005855956,0.00019544142,0.29628363,0.004050557,0.0008819484,0.0011660162,0.5104388,0.00013181068,0.0011111284,0.0014379275,0.18319607,0.0005210963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5011772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40137538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8923672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026768283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018623026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.609548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242657706","doi":"","title":"Improving New Zealand's prosecution system: A practical reform proposal to avoid miscarriages of justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Misconduct; Criminal justice; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Power (physics); Miscarriage; Quality (philosophy); Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04270603438513282,"score_gpt":0.3644047792279266,"score_spread":0.32169874484279376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242657706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06920126,0.21503519,0.004222324,0.20365228,0.01018521,0.022906795,0.00013323338,0.0018447433,0.47281897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98103267,0.003783923,0.0073793307,0.0013423259,0.0020810135,0.00013484208,0.000011743119,0.00003951169,0.0041946536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972069,0.0003897799,0.0006201369,0.00032254058,0.0007696575,0.00069097383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982436,0.00014622539,0.0003482253,0.0004049019,0.00023964624,0.0006174286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029566125,0.00020996624,0.0005033656,0.00004000694,0.0004407495,0.00007627948,0.00032309658,0.00013528117,0.00009983656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010909847,0.0001637722,0.00015202607,0.00035099476,0.00017869548,0.0009413465,0.00011538808,0.00022349409,0.00026347776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008618027,0.0001517203,0.00014536986,0.009966023,0.000027594891,0.000010665569,0.006412183,5.661961e-7,0.0010210001,0.9240287,0.050829343,0.0073206844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018364645,0.00015014033,0.00007902472,0.005034631,0.00059486856,0.00004632551,0.0035305708,0.000007781048,0.0009737814,0.00013034792,0.98893315,0.0003357635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02614965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003459483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004241025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048502986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243273353","doi":"","title":"Cops, Crime & Capitalism: The Law and Order Agenda in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05368917277048744,"score_gpt":0.28402606341095377,"score_spread":0.23033689064046634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243273353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9078175,0.0007277995,0.0000024808455,0.0018748309,0.00031344246,0.00009325091,0.0000038683893,0.000011317237,0.089155525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997549,0.0001925963,0.000049188915,0.0014052216,0.0000632024,0.0000052310074,5.394249e-7,0.00000438409,0.00073064765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929976,0.00006901742,0.000099516976,0.00012684944,0.00017638164,0.00022846536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999677,0.000093931245,0.000030861323,0.000107156535,0.00003364912,0.000057382287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022104297,0.00006359741,0.000078048455,0.000009630124,0.00020152729,0.00004282476,0.00023507533,0.00001829942,0.00021613923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004332656,0.000045808956,0.000011277957,0.000072176605,0.00016661033,0.00016050324,0.000047573812,0.00007158242,0.000018808674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022466598,0.000025925196,0.10618579,0.000014011906,0.000024692246,0.0001976549,0.06304121,0.0000025906102,0.00006529623,0.82224053,0.005863648,0.0023161983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073369953,0.000099245124,0.26508364,0.00016121511,0.00009299249,0.00003071047,0.062264025,0.000108830856,0.0026566999,0.043116,0.62467307,0.0009798952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99932355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000844272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021733943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2366573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244415706","doi":"","title":"The Transnational Judicial Discourse and Felon Disenfranchisement: Re-examining the Textual Premise of Richardson v. Ramirez","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038082577830004787,"score_gpt":0.3461734799922609,"score_spread":0.3080909021622561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244415706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77243805,0.00078915426,0.00037220164,0.120165646,0.00018348981,0.0004250139,0.000011706515,0.00003818228,0.10557658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700177,0.00019341099,0.00008120187,0.00014030619,0.00033019707,0.000011078771,0.0000013116427,0.0000041609815,0.0022365882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887925,0.00011697429,0.00018548095,0.0001361526,0.0004792796,0.00020287414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.00050382246,0.00006619931,0.000108362074,0.00005134976,0.000058460537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010102782,0.000071976254,0.00008454727,0.000014351763,0.0010981973,0.00007275793,0.00023008279,0.000034644163,0.00020168677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012656004,0.000039521023,0.000037898742,0.00010510015,0.0007011599,0.000201108,0.00002682048,0.00008644231,0.000003077435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088288645,0.00006881915,0.0027443636,0.000009251022,0.000023309096,6.6983415e-7,0.032670677,0.00003711765,0.00033720152,0.8178178,0.0041198614,0.14208266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012971204,0.00025961487,0.16588011,0.00010269101,0.0002559423,0.0000033247188,0.15606785,0.0017376291,0.0011146519,0.011139958,0.6615459,0.0005952502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042546226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009860924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8066778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030068428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007279752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84465563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244818772","doi":"","title":"Stopping Vehicles on a Downhill Slope: R. v. Nolet","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.027230698290303796,"score_gpt":0.30166925562167957,"score_spread":0.2744385573313758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244818772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7433941,0.00013586857,0.000014281236,0.011468066,0.0011643328,0.0002210976,0.000009026117,0.0002095395,0.24338374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990945,0.00004614904,0.00047542082,0.0026330212,0.0010529597,0.00001914065,0.0000027793728,0.000016509272,0.004809009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982757,0.00011648578,0.00020581747,0.00035617917,0.00053624145,0.00050958875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887997,0.00021164257,0.000074512405,0.00038341506,0.00009745312,0.00035300542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082529074,0.0001527549,0.00017893591,0.000043667602,0.00097281724,0.00026294377,0.0005050458,0.00016825073,0.0014505505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004896949,0.00014350722,0.00009964043,0.00020776752,0.0003907657,0.00043257474,0.00007166375,0.0005761919,0.0020652818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005069349,0.00010363215,0.0032705634,0.000022095526,0.000015105017,0.00004317592,0.0025461933,0.000009546557,0.011328455,0.9500351,0.019632144,0.012943328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019759494,0.00005396041,0.0039246255,0.00006664321,0.000013864723,0.0000026971925,0.000808008,0.0000052242403,0.0014305053,0.0042120293,0.9890334,0.0002514613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009860543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03922794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96940124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006243987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013855858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245175412","doi":"","title":"Reforming Homicide Law to Separate Guilt from Sentence: An International Gloss","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Homicide; Sentence; Surprise; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Presumption of innocence; Reasonable doubt; Criminology; Psychology; Simple (philosophy); Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Poison control; Epistemology; Human factors and ergonomics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.047426615117072524,"score_gpt":0.3379117326207648,"score_spread":0.29048511750369227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245175412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88297766,0.00008287379,0.000056524692,0.005053214,0.0010150074,0.00017425278,0.00004311468,0.00013650143,0.11046082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818517,0.000099411714,0.002475163,0.0040711802,0.0013392303,0.000018044835,0.000027342405,0.00001673629,0.00376772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979611,0.00012609886,0.0003040053,0.0004530373,0.0006841628,0.00047159957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859184,0.0000842126,0.00008899346,0.0005361117,0.00018449788,0.00051432516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046074984,0.00016510121,0.00020433111,0.000037670197,0.0010666696,0.00019769001,0.001213889,0.000112992326,0.00087751023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002629295,0.00016283024,0.00009084665,0.00018717874,0.00036464853,0.0014757437,0.00021457931,0.00021358351,0.0014148321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004225309,0.0002956359,0.056428105,0.000014282217,0.00009176046,0.0005681654,0.027019888,0.00028547342,0.009919701,0.87809944,0.024115264,0.0027397296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035235047,0.000087636865,0.010702959,0.00010663565,0.00002073963,0.000017990373,0.0033833045,0.000056534027,0.0031929293,0.009802623,0.9718054,0.00047090923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18557568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101606175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025704454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014143043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245328831","doi":"","title":"Ontario (Attorney General) V. $29, 020 in Canadian Currency: A Comment on Proceeds of Crime and Provincial Civil Forfeiture Laws","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Currency; Organised crime; Charter; Criminal law; Constitutionality; Legislature; Civil law (Civil law); Business; Economics; Public law; Constitution","score_opus":0.011713126825214071,"score_gpt":0.2651457106834606,"score_spread":0.2534325838582465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245328831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94313705,0.0028291284,0.00002227077,0.013147228,0.0002084462,0.00035563877,0.00000558224,0.000011391611,0.040283293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969311,0.00036022635,0.000023795636,0.0003691535,0.00039697066,0.000006693699,0.0000028002912,0.000008319074,0.0019009418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731874,0.000085524414,0.00027805244,0.00017945138,0.00035357644,0.0017846602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994894,0.000027011945,0.00012353514,0.000074756725,0.00008397515,0.00020127583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015005835,0.00013260078,0.00019449319,0.00015022537,0.00039615968,0.000067601664,0.00023468825,0.00010455746,0.00007129093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051840634,0.00012186691,0.000059573566,0.0001647765,0.00011641496,0.0001864031,0.000016756681,0.0010742075,0.0000047974563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006421886,0.00012053739,0.104580015,0.000016295095,0.000017942897,0.000010609662,0.0049433885,0.000011275911,0.000052367082,0.8815374,0.004031375,0.0046146023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008981429,0.0008141439,0.033296447,0.00017854641,0.000056032834,0.000060545968,0.0030944105,0.000016716935,0.00009593418,0.17797272,0.78311497,0.00040139482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98224074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7790836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038616622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014120412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245648687","doi":"","title":"'Canada' in Electronic Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Supreme court; Common law; Civil procedure; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil code; Public law","score_opus":0.0215770741561695,"score_gpt":0.2969440318780948,"score_spread":0.2753669577219253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245648687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90548134,0.0011923205,0.000011312072,0.020186953,0.0009839457,0.00029066688,0.0000034660466,0.00008385573,0.07176613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942213,0.00018386179,0.00011117812,0.0016316561,0.00039639973,0.000019805857,7.983862e-7,0.0000095386295,0.0034254086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981504,0.0001251887,0.00020539958,0.0002935399,0.0005298494,0.0006956049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989991,0.00031704872,0.00005392923,0.00029606107,0.000070779264,0.00026306722],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001076413,0.00011231035,0.00014925111,0.00003015883,0.00037115221,0.00011678092,0.00055751484,0.000103484475,0.0014182423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010332352,0.000115411254,0.000044070304,0.0002993943,0.00022344654,0.000555952,0.00005108606,0.00064725376,0.00022695914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028343125,0.00003389123,0.014654453,0.000016585209,0.000004805437,0.000041875603,0.0005594689,0.0000068458244,0.002484803,0.9611447,0.018849079,0.0021751774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098675904,0.000025733341,0.007449411,0.00007141987,0.0000069605153,0.0000027219278,0.0003147927,0.000007219678,0.00049818074,0.006566841,0.9847563,0.00020172294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9521387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029163525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024624793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246492865","doi":"","title":"Is There a Tyranny of the Charter in Criminal Justice and Security Policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Criminal justice; Temptation; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02036313857419476,"score_gpt":0.33710782809370854,"score_spread":0.3167446895195138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246492865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803528,0.0027713326,0.00009730033,0.008979632,0.00009771739,0.00007429614,9.835879e-7,0.00000436081,0.0076215845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954368,0.0032663334,0.0000072806333,0.00030839228,0.000378797,4.890168e-7,4.0090068e-8,0.0000045786005,0.0005973205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981388,0.00011143803,0.00018743204,0.00009836607,0.00029340215,0.0011705519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995982,0.000087830966,0.00009923367,0.00008521631,0.00006220325,0.00006729153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003269478,0.000069128066,0.00010140376,0.000067395464,0.000328021,0.000029819548,0.0002568163,0.00006166093,0.000031301242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018298186,0.000049261667,0.000059750957,0.0002504326,0.00022270836,0.00015447676,0.000029885075,0.0008165203,0.0000030897108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011321023,0.000068159825,0.013855594,0.000048728543,0.000023383183,0.0000058218193,0.06770619,5.6831334e-7,0.00025178588,0.9006886,0.00012553702,0.017112432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081677194,0.0003073893,0.079361536,0.00019056181,0.0002982754,0.00029303873,0.23207058,0.000017406232,0.00046742675,0.66800034,0.017883511,0.00029314592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050915116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050632842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23268822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003611347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015254717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96669066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2247805046","doi":"","title":"Keeping 'Reasonable Grounds' Meaningful","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Standard of review; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Certainty; Democracy; State (computer science); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05706473386376535,"score_gpt":0.2937734979247573,"score_spread":0.23670876406099198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2247805046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106287576,0.0005828632,0.00023622304,0.0009314096,0.0007164862,0.00019325504,0.0000026806365,0.00027350982,0.890776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864421,0.00008275163,0.002024964,0.001206191,0.0005460971,0.000020384929,0.0000019576428,0.000019441028,0.009656128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818337,0.00016191059,0.000223154,0.0003426111,0.00047487204,0.00061405293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899733,0.000108280045,0.00008559331,0.00031251158,0.00011769144,0.0003785662],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009851531,0.0001454486,0.00019118802,0.000034707635,0.0010304428,0.00018162405,0.0005203022,0.00012129358,0.0033936966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003452728,0.00015069393,0.00010676581,0.00024797284,0.00033648184,0.0009004353,0.00009083346,0.0002332097,0.001789771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025835187,0.000053971882,0.0041519823,0.000017064227,0.0000148195795,0.00003347285,0.0072538536,9.532768e-7,0.00012971436,0.9824858,0.00452123,0.0013113588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022396374,0.00007462386,0.0036028961,0.00012609817,0.00004298178,0.000006855226,0.0058991225,0.0000088484685,0.0006475183,0.041013725,0.94794273,0.000410608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07861007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031223515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94342154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013150547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014103121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249886553","doi":"","title":"Across the Rubicon and into the Apennines: Privacy and Common Law Police Powers after A.M. and Kang-Brown","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Political science; Right to privacy; Geography","score_opus":0.009976294823833233,"score_gpt":0.313977231201031,"score_spread":0.3040009363771978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249886553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94196784,0.011605988,0.000018118157,0.044690542,0.000054524542,0.00012397724,5.456654e-7,0.000012571436,0.0015258705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881683,0.00926783,0.000009180401,0.0017758801,0.00025789562,0.0000027374479,1.7834923e-7,0.0000059822846,0.0005120214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981469,0.00017717751,0.00015223419,0.00015535599,0.00023731582,0.0011310253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994712,0.00017529984,0.000078274505,0.00012867767,0.000039775663,0.000106769774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002099202,0.00011716117,0.00012503694,0.000015510448,0.0017130973,0.00043213269,0.00027813506,0.00006095996,0.000009915969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043123742,0.00006640077,0.000036689962,0.00010606202,0.00068723445,0.00037637993,0.00006837318,0.0007988599,0.0000027365459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026486613,0.00004584706,0.012179319,0.000010343754,0.00006684059,0.0000072233966,0.21650356,0.0000010049599,0.00030429018,0.6598881,0.00028507633,0.110443525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000807728,0.0007665181,0.056603063,0.00009905568,0.00012545688,0.0006860377,0.15423703,0.000016821818,0.000049657145,0.5979848,0.18818906,0.00043478515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012397422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12005195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18790399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013710857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025153745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253119515","doi":"","title":"Surveilling the Stopgap","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Political science; Law; Parliament; Tempest; Government (linguistics); Politics; Computer security; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06028098316163124,"score_gpt":0.3042727295705397,"score_spread":0.24399174640890844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253119515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75676286,0.0100601595,0.009547092,0.016555062,0.001561188,0.0002803009,8.8945126e-7,0.00012020114,0.20511223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910741,0.0042450964,0.000032563003,0.00011396138,0.0004532769,0.0000014722361,9.90631e-8,0.0000062711792,0.004073179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977249,0.00022616958,0.00012870136,0.0000880347,0.00028231562,0.0015499047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999596,0.0000893716,0.000074050324,0.00009904864,0.000073507814,0.00006801353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053581665,0.000061197534,0.000069204085,0.00002478115,0.0011226448,0.00006167018,0.00044062606,0.00003926128,0.00020397308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001652465,0.00004034935,0.00007761936,0.00013317868,0.00016406231,0.00020869306,0.000019699633,0.00094795116,0.00008053207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800416,0.000017964725,0.002829389,6.605127e-7,0.0000223948,0.0000026212022,0.009462384,0.0000010595219,0.000015336787,0.96629155,0.00022820597,0.021110427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014986808,0.00015691758,0.0031477448,0.000015494126,0.00003565745,0.00011737734,0.06474302,0.00000671693,0.00004385377,0.8018082,0.12959343,0.00018172337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00489786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042271424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23431121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033557203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015729737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97520465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254021402","doi":"","title":"Duty, Causation and Third Party Perpetrators: The Bonnie Mooney Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Duty of care; Law; Duty; Harm; Tort; Criminology; Liability; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01463328706713153,"score_gpt":0.2819967522627262,"score_spread":0.2673634651955947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254021402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97538805,0.004264819,0.0003538995,0.012776197,0.00013233628,0.000106554304,0.0000011167525,0.000027494572,0.006949548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442935,0.0023010434,0.000014839162,0.00011282355,0.00084409496,0.0000030803574,5.563432e-7,0.0000064049036,0.0022877902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980288,0.00020057605,0.00017309372,0.00012675115,0.00030253764,0.0011682343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995569,0.000115265604,0.00009509401,0.000088460845,0.000072334995,0.00007191884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002830309,0.00008656046,0.00008695336,0.00003169677,0.0015869569,0.00020990903,0.00014276909,0.000060818416,0.000033376953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010353778,0.000059584756,0.000052101474,0.00013878457,0.00020926679,0.00032372616,0.000018619827,0.00077428186,0.000015443744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245357,0.0000365132,0.0071137594,0.0000037887623,0.000024464705,0.00011908083,0.00346422,0.000013450843,0.0001345476,0.9791871,0.003481257,0.0063993703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046899568,0.00026173473,0.004505342,0.000033778313,0.00013803822,0.008786894,0.059561465,0.00008406321,0.00007468695,0.79120946,0.13451482,0.00036071407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15970606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18797763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040068454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011461319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254515376","doi":"10.71781/23620","title":"Analyse comparative de l'impact généré par l'existence du programme NAOMI sur les niveaux de commission d'actes criminels et incivils à Montréal et Vancouver","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17828725387295014,"score_gpt":0.4388510293696507,"score_spread":0.26056377549670057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254515376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503035,0.0027528433,0.0003485569,0.0012816906,0.00043961342,0.0012394588,0.000108918626,0.0000118051,0.043513644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816373,0.0010190478,0.008863781,0.00015679735,0.00018783101,0.000059151687,0.00033365705,0.00004337954,0.007699048],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458116,0.0014656459,0.0008748965,0.00090167136,0.00088561623,0.0012910013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954931,0.001496928,0.00089920143,0.0004275117,0.0008539536,0.0008292834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041763126,0.00072633056,0.0011186292,0.00018381188,0.0011801154,0.0009661781,0.0015521935,0.000670179,0.002026347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011499164,0.00066777464,0.00043770103,0.0007473704,0.0006216452,0.0017413894,0.00023470423,0.0008963749,0.000190838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030179576,0.0026964063,0.10159753,0.00038325624,0.000745136,0.000680855,0.6082954,0.0020199511,0.007297068,0.0027390467,0.02240034,0.24812709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018835765,0.0013955557,0.3175477,0.0041927244,0.0017739418,0.000051046456,0.37433532,0.0036972847,0.014161896,0.001487526,0.2767179,0.0027555274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4168771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79040295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37352586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009985354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025640847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254649385","doi":"","title":"The Principles of Fundamental Justice and s. 488.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Privilege (computing); Scrutiny; Supreme court; Political science; Confidentiality; Economic Justice; Parliament; Criminal code; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.105560486193494,"score_gpt":0.4068096936782019,"score_spread":0.3012492074847079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254649385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947129,0.0005193539,0.0000120984905,0.006923304,0.00013293231,0.00008608095,0.0000016184044,0.0000063251646,0.045189302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99131036,0.00054895034,0.000065368775,0.00005083601,0.000054199038,0.0000015876373,6.904641e-8,0.0000023109117,0.007966329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993826,0.00007860136,0.00009450453,0.00007101216,0.00024128957,0.00013194853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944264,0.00027103713,0.000080963575,0.0001257525,0.00004545515,0.0000341252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043845148,0.00004045779,0.00006439381,0.0000065147888,0.00043561836,0.00002138525,0.00021644309,0.000022668291,0.00004135053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024642047,0.000023318165,0.000029543775,0.00008987746,0.00070692546,0.00004676142,0.00007136722,0.00005157948,0.0000023329608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024744935,0.00012639124,0.04923648,0.00024514095,0.000033193457,0.0000063170114,0.21077524,0.000036024063,0.0065728063,0.719926,0.0034750323,0.009319904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018585988,0.000089728346,0.09785526,0.000109290355,0.0002537751,0.000010150924,0.27147198,0.00006711255,0.0023923235,0.00079103437,0.6266578,0.000115661336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032371879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068026944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.719135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017970282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006386704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48936814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255146246","doi":"","title":"Using the Criminal Law, 1750-1850: Policing, Power and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Parliament; State (computer science); Politics; Power (physics); Criminal justice; Oppression; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.052827464539258365,"score_gpt":0.3295284260009131,"score_spread":0.27670096146165474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255146246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94659567,0.0040993597,0.0021561254,0.0063178265,0.00034104235,0.00021183112,9.3012915e-7,0.000027400061,0.0402498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954218,0.0024150354,0.00006241231,0.0006431448,0.00025196662,0.0000015605639,5.552673e-8,0.000010056066,0.0011939448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741036,0.00037919433,0.00018591277,0.00012274558,0.0003399222,0.0015618727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943054,0.00013090656,0.00013239923,0.0001350516,0.00008368711,0.0000874394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503783,0.00010529173,0.00012497607,0.000027936227,0.0019067104,0.00016265121,0.00042131174,0.000039333474,0.00006368865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009831186,0.000056095545,0.000087021275,0.000114449555,0.0010162034,0.00027867037,0.00005369115,0.0009860765,0.000008400605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010273217,0.000011237394,0.00027655347,0.0000013572918,0.00003390041,0.0000027669262,0.04193029,0.0000019175616,0.000033377735,0.9561137,0.00005029329,0.0014418826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061139156,0.00017034206,0.0007175126,0.00003380645,0.0001824407,0.0005185854,0.08695698,0.0000410366,0.00007194345,0.8983332,0.012162117,0.0002006468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055443652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061935406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057780493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027505713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010760002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255281031","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2600272","title":"Googling 'Dunsmuir's Standards of Review' in the Evolution of Law Surrounding Substantive Judicial Review in Canadian Administrative Law: A Paradigmatic Peep and Many Thoughts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Administrative law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.055409092741845994,"score_gpt":0.3817138325936928,"score_spread":0.3263047398518468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255281031","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22669129,0.73057234,0.00023383409,0.010842039,0.00019925178,0.0011862823,0.000027022325,0.000007275435,0.030240681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882352,0.11147013,0.00001534296,0.00016209517,0.000086172564,0.000005668064,8.463901e-7,0.0000047953263,0.000019750949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966762,0.0009109067,0.0005352749,0.0001382361,0.0006918472,0.0010475416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989916,0.00019375158,0.00031987406,0.00010072397,0.0002577845,0.00013627158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017574856,0.000110083914,0.0003958891,0.0000814614,0.00023389695,0.000030634947,0.00027515384,0.000053469365,0.0000057185584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000812632,0.00008438571,0.00006508457,0.0004413922,0.00033525354,0.00035546086,0.00001079127,0.00069782586,6.307334e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030685274,0.000020214713,0.0011511985,0.00029579055,0.000013643074,0.0000108845825,0.008050523,0.0000013460354,0.000004147194,0.9898418,0.000052417272,0.00052734866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011442904,0.0010704678,0.0015906707,0.035093714,0.0003790144,0.000308683,0.118185945,0.00004211628,0.000031934618,0.81065524,0.030978268,0.0005196763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40407786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032347962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010413517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255318061","doi":"","title":"Do We Need a Parol Evidence Rule","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Mistake; Underdevelopment; Criticism; Law and economics; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05060742206206762,"score_gpt":0.3289836783727825,"score_spread":0.27837625631071483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255318061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8544832,0.07337481,0.0018589593,0.05758257,0.0007092249,0.00027007336,9.7159e-7,0.00013755019,0.011582681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87376124,0.118873715,0.00006677489,0.00012075872,0.00073798845,0.0000044677645,1.18553885e-7,0.000010292852,0.0064246496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621326,0.00024507215,0.00024495224,0.00020238453,0.0006774478,0.002416897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916756,0.00020550938,0.00013132769,0.00015738556,0.00013564367,0.00020258395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028607678,0.00012562053,0.00017012404,0.000077659875,0.0014952032,0.00009964041,0.0005460476,0.000087579945,0.00022103604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051989063,0.00011201256,0.00014339261,0.00031417373,0.00027230362,0.00069106696,0.0000349246,0.0012665243,0.00026178543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027547788,0.00017264382,0.023156706,0.000017867369,0.00013461373,0.00014896107,0.025174176,0.000034567784,0.0009755728,0.8446114,0.009158115,0.09613989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006277119,0.00059232675,0.0022218735,0.0003913513,0.000099011595,0.001995946,0.041409153,0.000021994572,0.00015348141,0.6423515,0.30948102,0.0006545902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017175449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041901544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30032292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090361485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048005325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255455827","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1979210","title":"The Niqab and Witness Testimony: Balancing the Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Law; Psychology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.018690705257834953,"score_gpt":0.3140327712100625,"score_spread":0.29534206595222756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255455827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162657,0.040625103,0.0011071346,0.035279814,0.0008025108,0.00014662264,2.888742e-7,0.000031554002,0.005741225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673946,0.0107781915,0.000005950798,0.00012521839,0.00082022086,0.000002794942,6.143612e-8,0.0000060697107,0.0015220431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976254,0.00020550296,0.00012086538,0.00006911604,0.0002543926,0.0017247413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926364,0.00041370117,0.00007842016,0.00009578042,0.00004940537,0.00009902459],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005304984,0.00007053506,0.00006690002,0.000015258236,0.0021973292,0.00019948646,0.0003367327,0.000033569482,0.000010813875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042563662,0.00003620055,0.00003794062,0.00011303399,0.00035337108,0.000328415,0.00004464688,0.0008782581,0.000016101108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026982523,0.000017289563,0.035216857,0.0000022364227,0.00003529343,0.0000010692199,0.0080038225,0.0000014694104,0.000048916983,0.8874539,0.0010071691,0.068185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033674217,0.00021315465,0.034348227,0.000097867785,0.00011510073,0.00081813947,0.14644782,0.00005273765,0.000047416026,0.5173486,0.29982445,0.00034975228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010331356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01646597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37010533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007087229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255920396","doi":"","title":"R v Hart: A Welcome New Emphasis on Reliability and Admissibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Reliability (semiconductor); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics; Power (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.024346094017009906,"score_gpt":0.3208968020501407,"score_spread":0.29655070803313077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255920396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103989,0.001336159,0.0010667037,0.0811816,0.0002983132,0.00015140598,0.000001856017,0.000053950447,0.0055111013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858052,0.004473029,0.00005454194,0.00017750022,0.00053719396,0.0000015403656,8.5261235e-8,0.0000073475353,0.008943542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997331,0.0002432182,0.00021607072,0.00027229424,0.0003868768,0.0015504966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989845,0.00030531015,0.00008988985,0.00019543772,0.000072966555,0.00035187713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003985104,0.00011035299,0.00015104763,0.000044002478,0.0005802961,0.00007811773,0.00025675565,0.000079649304,0.00028330175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014074582,0.00007136439,0.00009258427,0.000119145996,0.00021540117,0.00036146844,0.000029695655,0.00055546523,0.00007350933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035621246,0.00012425732,0.022697644,0.000007940882,0.00003906923,0.0000057535403,0.0023661167,7.9123356e-7,0.00029894884,0.48988715,0.0031931286,0.48102298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005967726,0.0005264989,0.008194483,0.00008053706,0.000029711899,0.000050359155,0.002077575,0.0000011995401,0.000086136475,0.7683607,0.2197884,0.00020767027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016767085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010396494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48081532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010796371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034212132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60690856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256065387","doi":"","title":"Introduction - The Human Rights Revolution in Criminal Evidence and Procedure","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Torture; Presumption of innocence; International human rights law; Political science; Common law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Right to a fair trial; Sociology","score_opus":0.028444114663867308,"score_gpt":0.3279999851622667,"score_spread":0.2995558704983994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256065387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704635,0.01096498,0.00012467228,0.017396044,0.00027087313,0.00014045517,8.6759464e-8,0.00001520006,0.0006241577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934096,0.0022640114,0.00001743674,0.000036370056,0.0030710022,0.0000055545515,2.5315506e-7,0.000004340022,0.001191476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976808,0.00027553458,0.00017539121,0.00012922371,0.00030828267,0.0014307959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960524,0.00007084504,0.00009551671,0.00008625689,0.000060921077,0.000081210535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053584245,0.00008027205,0.00008637027,0.000058906837,0.00143323,0.000073000534,0.00018960016,0.000058397007,0.00004095865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027077086,0.00005570306,0.000032873257,0.0001896201,0.0002088438,0.0010585224,0.000021053434,0.0010128798,0.000014532751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002977442,0.000049979233,0.015176587,0.000012220274,0.000009422928,7.20745e-7,0.008612076,0.0000027613698,0.00034049174,0.97179455,0.0012346931,0.002736739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041977543,0.00045309117,0.11521086,0.00031632982,0.00021055996,0.0010659553,0.0485239,0.000019998512,0.00016463884,0.68690175,0.14621408,0.0004990871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032166794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042411122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2848928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084356434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045736966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256370955","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Law of Evidence: Plus Ça Change…?","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14357124532806942,"score_gpt":0.3258891899508425,"score_spread":0.18231794462277306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256370955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35646987,0.23439269,0.00015990266,0.06785399,0.016940102,0.0027375945,0.0000908045,0.00011824499,0.32123682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98233175,0.002007043,0.00011671344,0.00041163134,0.0007125656,0.0000373314,3.200195e-7,0.000014832629,0.014367784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969762,0.0007290706,0.00053878024,0.00030952235,0.0008856063,0.00056081766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768,0.0005734621,0.00046118628,0.0007538691,0.0003485496,0.00018291782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020653782,0.00020051522,0.00030822528,0.000018762905,0.00113988,0.000054383174,0.0013187876,0.00022306616,0.0007764632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056804,0.000119175806,0.00029557344,0.0005947314,0.0040269373,0.00094937824,0.00027302437,0.00036628504,0.00025906588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075590964,0.000060688257,0.0021507426,0.00012608152,0.0000279873,0.0000019305178,0.009507387,0.0000031135953,0.00020990783,0.9838557,0.001869794,0.002111066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052106194,0.0005677178,0.034534153,0.004373568,0.00054409023,0.000012673563,0.025296673,0.0000982786,0.0071594506,0.117145054,0.80910146,0.0006458009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3151017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12574434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86671066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040923234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040373832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256806795","doi":"","title":"Public Interest Immunity after Bill C-36","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Legislation; Constitution; Political science; Jurisdiction; Preamble; Public interest; Terrorism; Secession; Sovereign immunity; Bill of rights; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.184133385017116,"score_gpt":0.3956970407353083,"score_spread":0.2115636557181923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256806795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6937282,0.00036087574,0.00007388931,0.027897775,0.00036324665,0.00009229411,5.701493e-7,0.00007748117,0.27740565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981012,0.000057962287,0.00015473529,0.00031077163,0.00006661979,0.000008848748,3.688183e-7,0.000005373352,0.018383363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915916,0.00022308924,0.000073421324,0.00011696985,0.00015196968,0.00027540664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949527,0.0000915305,0.000026726928,0.00019255145,0.00006757278,0.00012636898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058809074,0.00006271522,0.000074602474,0.00003145747,0.00026189952,0.00011252677,0.00018608535,0.0000521959,0.0026425775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065694086,0.000048984977,0.000043290187,0.00019015318,0.00019888025,0.00021058797,0.00003265242,0.000118281685,0.0004651445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008986762,0.00029177984,0.02638697,0.000039778104,0.00003247962,0.00006625913,0.1111023,6.0582664e-7,0.0008797888,0.80658096,0.044453755,0.010075481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051766685,0.000019602423,0.002873021,0.0000144549995,0.000005530419,0.0000015171833,0.012318615,5.573283e-7,0.00019461081,0.0025508164,0.98186904,0.00010047186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052369544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013398413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006089673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103457234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257134394","doi":"","title":"The Evolving Test for Stays of Proceedings","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; Test (biology); Prejudice (legal term); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02508658694503403,"score_gpt":0.3007706753364625,"score_spread":0.2756840883914285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257134394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9200606,0.01445302,0.0027041757,0.024781836,0.00053892046,0.0007021302,0.0000037624702,0.000067771165,0.036687825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98773855,0.0076567144,0.000082174745,0.000020372863,0.00036864882,0.000005081562,8.521505e-8,0.0000062467116,0.004122116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981915,0.000015507834,0.00016949368,0.00007622226,0.00028936873,0.001257924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991076,0.00036071223,0.00013826393,0.000040457904,0.0003006056,0.000052356685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025778746,0.000053885455,0.000083076186,0.000022904618,0.0018320291,0.000047002413,0.00031435897,0.000033603537,0.000008465111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012558916,0.000037452286,0.00008184567,0.00012391298,0.00023384832,0.00023606961,0.000013329281,0.00041093683,0.0000029731484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004857997,0.000044349916,0.01170602,0.000009375568,0.000031527652,7.1184434e-7,0.0061540804,0.0000011537993,0.0008065977,0.96817565,0.004503662,0.008518268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005901732,0.0011117177,0.0033068897,0.00008168236,0.00006965324,0.0002942342,0.07572967,0.00008643225,0.0006433092,0.65502757,0.26277712,0.00028154164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003189547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003120854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3131481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003591094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021404352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257617230","doi":"","title":"Les principes de justices fondamentale en matière de sécurité nationale (Principles of Fundamental Justice in National Security)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.039495793520413956,"score_gpt":0.343872322105937,"score_spread":0.30437652858552305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257617230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89186954,0.04503441,0.00030503716,0.0048894524,0.00078769925,0.00020495616,0.00003764508,0.00001666726,0.056854602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732108,0.01183477,0.00061423733,0.00010068491,0.0019123045,0.0000123138425,0.0000058994424,0.000020185485,0.012288777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949552,0.00061355904,0.00059121574,0.0001988596,0.00096658734,0.002674581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847203,0.00065754086,0.00038155314,0.00008029896,0.0001869717,0.00022160218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006854521,0.00021981375,0.00026280058,0.00020946603,0.00052397005,0.00008092449,0.00049886585,0.0002189652,0.0008402465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005933633,0.00024192916,0.00015936828,0.00041582622,0.00041490613,0.0011272354,0.0000968949,0.0014852734,0.000040150233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005449162,0.00043405578,0.04211108,0.00022627048,0.00008803757,0.0000035599926,0.015200486,0.00018077837,0.0003752329,0.9382369,0.00008919758,0.0029999248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016711275,0.0005424262,0.03433967,0.0010880382,0.0008356053,0.001110433,0.17702915,0.0012134878,0.0010243149,0.48465484,0.29555443,0.0009364578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054546394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02533209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45358205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065953876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004826217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257657705","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0008","title":"privacy’s second home: Building a New Home for Privacy Under Section 15 of the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Guard (computer science); Information privacy; Right to privacy; Law; Enforcement; Section (typography); Privacy law; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Human rights; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.069157753108154,"score_gpt":0.30974649138274274,"score_spread":0.24058873827458874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257657705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020991363,0.0013975194,0.0037596836,0.013888611,0.0043874523,0.002577653,0.000059331076,0.00020313126,0.95273525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12585273,0.00036960945,0.00059613487,0.00044555226,0.0016659795,0.000012034029,0.0000040705777,0.000040773226,0.8710131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984105,0.00002864305,0.0003532697,0.00037560242,0.0005036192,0.00032831327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880934,0.0002184394,0.00029195717,0.00040187253,0.00014769517,0.00013067611],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030177445,0.00024200056,0.00035623848,0.00008625275,0.0005052982,0.00006713787,0.0006188593,0.00038912505,0.0027692588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006254724,0.00018101341,0.00036152004,0.00006120574,0.0002977439,0.00025780106,0.00014750958,0.00027702405,0.000027914719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007230736,0.000029370618,0.00008039466,0.00021247647,0.00012624245,0.0000024487326,0.012584338,0.0000046813434,0.00042811234,0.7127437,0.26682973,0.0068861665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020153908,0.000059121743,0.00047146165,0.00018360557,0.00006521391,0.0000068735594,0.0002060146,0.0000026431487,0.00013270274,0.048235424,0.95015746,0.00027795404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009025669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024637699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017905337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005125074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257775551","doi":"","title":"Setting Standards: Evidence, Proof and the Certification Motion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Plaintiff; Class action; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Action (physics); Law; Summary judgment; Burden of proof; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.04930555754490166,"score_gpt":0.3212158796490763,"score_spread":0.2719103221041746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257775551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72332954,0.054264918,0.061676405,0.09173809,0.0013933867,0.0018669444,0.0000048072015,0.00019300908,0.06553291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327606,0.005483334,0.000057655114,0.000057382484,0.00027295545,0.0000066386315,1.5518823e-7,0.0000052064725,0.0008405947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980213,0.00036532103,0.00017795071,0.00012077735,0.00043687297,0.0008777507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993779,0.00013870816,0.00014138226,0.00008932458,0.00019670228,0.000056002962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011105293,0.000063795414,0.0000819814,0.000033732846,0.0010471364,0.00010782982,0.00021251959,0.000042132677,0.00004723855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091081974,0.000042079835,0.000046258723,0.00012484308,0.00031805196,0.00052608264,0.000019220979,0.00060597167,0.0000056040635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018272638,0.000014211869,0.0016118806,0.0000059008507,0.000021428406,7.1107763e-7,0.016454708,9.182977e-7,0.00004305687,0.83797294,0.00014193181,0.14354959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005613869,0.00022208953,0.0030750537,0.00016063452,0.00011255389,0.00012004681,0.048407268,0.00008020803,0.00020368006,0.93115735,0.015705725,0.00019398595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013513215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061720945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26994655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005221574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014119429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8053832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257981024","doi":"","title":"Smith and the Supreme Court: Implications for Sentencing Policy and Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Punishment (psychology); Law; Sentencing guidelines; Reform Act; Charter; Vision; Sentence; Commission; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03130250775665623,"score_gpt":0.3259870783984141,"score_spread":0.2946845706417579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257981024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7156306,0.010384044,0.0054507502,0.2588215,0.00009189039,0.00049282616,0.000005183502,0.00003619902,0.009087044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703073,0.027496373,0.000072102586,0.00021370305,0.00047479302,0.0000089265,2.6428032e-7,0.000005290396,0.0014212406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870735,0.000056763638,0.000121154495,0.00009334951,0.00011509531,0.000906285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952406,0.00016941926,0.00006935208,0.00006852248,0.00009094376,0.0000777246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017710709,0.000058260135,0.000090648115,0.000036950158,0.0020374851,0.00005677819,0.0001391197,0.000031470237,0.0000018199705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026482722,0.000037704707,0.000042585296,0.00009961877,0.00041664136,0.00018732448,0.000020953667,0.00034377712,0.0000010042108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003893831,0.000005603524,0.0013608123,0.00000245938,0.000017658103,1.999609e-7,0.0032733446,4.1803412e-7,0.00002783248,0.9869106,0.00013437236,0.008227793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011868797,0.00015571657,0.010027555,0.000024797682,0.00006201569,0.0012483065,0.035064925,0.000044336903,0.000010974342,0.9047635,0.047253355,0.0001576171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071465005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01615029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25860777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005723015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002098433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258099037","doi":"10.29173/alr382","title":"Improving Wrongful Conviction Review: Lessons from a Comparative Analysis of Continental Criminal Procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Criminal law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.10539955246626069,"score_gpt":0.40427462869686653,"score_spread":0.29887507623060583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258099037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029731441,0.8552083,0.00009742521,0.028647482,0.0003749344,0.0019476867,0.000069651505,0.000056247038,0.08386687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999139,0.09516551,0.00019710015,0.0037003297,0.00011600261,0.000072245755,0.00012374534,0.000008650022,0.000702513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979965,0.00037401632,0.00056049007,0.00034176165,0.00047889006,0.0002483218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822575,0.00037137797,0.0004454331,0.000294146,0.0004537913,0.00020952802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009225975,0.00016881646,0.00097141706,0.000036877525,0.00017968788,0.00003265606,0.00031532615,0.000060625312,0.00044143398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009020105,0.0001437801,0.00027913935,0.000889271,0.00030483052,0.00035579526,0.000055488286,0.00012420767,0.00008210675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020068637,0.00087791076,0.010744069,0.029459385,0.0033312584,0.000024643734,0.048791047,0.000013649359,0.0004263665,0.73286796,0.15085468,0.022408338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023524459,0.00009230649,0.0008569863,0.015874462,0.013490151,0.000002973223,0.0025140368,0.00012361341,0.00007966527,0.00011031366,0.9662337,0.00038659622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22209215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20078602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87018245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088934474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022598018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81379753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258436064","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3244","title":"Polycentricity and queue jumping in public law remedies: A two-track response","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polycentricity; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Adjudication; Law; Political science; Sociology; Negotiation; Legislature; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05971884230427966,"score_gpt":0.30081584581321086,"score_spread":0.2410970035089312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258436064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82365596,0.0017571929,0.000091027476,0.011583918,0.00031028115,0.00010686452,0.0000032827431,0.000024552743,0.16246694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845046,0.00038234727,0.0006070663,0.0001051696,0.00008890171,2.0126741e-8,1.6734687e-7,0.0000025734755,0.0003633069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986783,0.00046323927,0.000121596284,0.00011948766,0.00035588426,0.00026144134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990768,0.00015957619,0.00011402268,0.0001044127,0.0001973207,0.0003478793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022345257,0.00006415355,0.00014828533,0.000029685849,0.0006386543,0.00007252562,0.00034369464,0.000060665327,0.00016648752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040597847,0.00007212557,0.000045725363,0.000058806025,0.00044184958,0.0013348351,0.00010492669,0.00014805168,0.0000034840496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034778721,0.0002326864,0.014864156,0.000025859928,0.00005419033,0.0005932883,0.15668005,0.000021409107,0.0004467692,0.8125607,0.0071149804,0.003928056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018797898,0.00020799063,0.0058759158,0.00016298563,0.00003604771,0.00005494075,0.17695846,0.000046775058,0.000039166294,0.003719812,0.81078625,0.00023187426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48505667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85746753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8088409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070145883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025743534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51837236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258502979","doi":"","title":"Our Evolving Judicature: Security Certificates, Detention Review, and the Federal Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutionality; Civil liberties; Immigration detention; Terrorism; National security; Supreme court; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.014131244572268494,"score_gpt":0.29330720471966504,"score_spread":0.27917596014739654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258502979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02395178,0.49408388,0.0011578547,0.4691425,0.00048234526,0.0006116908,0.0000020404125,0.00008085861,0.010487057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190379,0.07853593,0.000016885846,0.0003631267,0.0005389199,0.000005656653,0.0000014165761,0.0000069958246,0.0014931742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976228,0.00036283676,0.00024826947,0.0001598008,0.00036959836,0.0012366823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945825,0.00006602426,0.0001770615,0.000104301325,0.00012735253,0.000067010915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005378573,0.000101501355,0.00017874855,0.000025303341,0.0015322305,0.00023019544,0.00026796167,0.00006500523,0.000023535142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025941874,0.000069001966,0.00011021495,0.00015403738,0.00017796874,0.00029509573,0.000027103677,0.0011488895,0.000015529708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000991409,0.000076475975,0.0034083808,0.000082592334,0.00008473267,0.0000059599743,0.0009510611,0.0000021304716,0.000113740185,0.9124724,0.07480672,0.007896638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063852005,0.000059574377,0.0023730597,0.00020550289,0.00027526487,0.00027173033,0.0052463124,0.00003871084,0.000014261591,0.8963608,0.094283596,0.00023265513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004212151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023037987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8950861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040783297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006999965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258880212","doi":"","title":"On the Improvement of China’s Community Correction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Imprisonment; Legislation; Enforcement; Communism; Political science; Doctrine; Law; International community; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0744186931725974,"score_gpt":0.33296907932748565,"score_spread":0.25855038615488823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258880212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45755067,0.0000057806214,0.000008559502,0.006632712,0.0008535483,0.00012344052,0.0000050075632,0.000010865011,0.5348094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850166,0.000001926187,0.0000036779861,0.0006678871,0.00010380113,0.000004817252,3.7802744e-7,0.0000020004557,0.0007138724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988551,0.00014716868,0.00008557002,0.00009025079,0.00050709286,0.0003147865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918914,0.000094776195,0.000053808973,0.0001369924,0.00017943371,0.00034584408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003408548,0.000046201363,0.00006225848,0.00005723679,0.0027215444,0.00007541603,0.0006231607,0.000034654084,0.00006526723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013388463,0.000036509788,0.000027071108,0.00063628075,0.0017479842,0.00016989921,0.00003104809,0.00017495916,0.000017321192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011051277,0.000038607373,0.0017572257,0.0000033141835,0.0000029743785,0.0000015711299,0.11484194,0.0000035138216,0.00044431954,0.78992975,0.059685625,0.03328009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031666987,0.0006699794,0.04635473,0.000089516434,0.000029221874,0.0000013991005,0.5293851,0.000107527514,0.002698252,0.04936503,0.37042728,0.0005553004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72076094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57500494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74056476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008237873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019787026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259074632","doi":"","title":"Problems with the Newly Expanded Power of Citizen's Arrest","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01577623504199432,"score_gpt":0.27708069868237517,"score_spread":0.26130446364038085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259074632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497676,0.0065699513,0.0021101139,0.015841832,0.0003858675,0.00024469537,7.911139e-7,0.000029012022,0.025050124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964302,0.0009294189,0.00002931672,0.00008368027,0.00039622845,0.0000038106414,1.8982536e-7,0.000008626873,0.002118508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748516,0.00014754412,0.00014032987,0.00007553586,0.00043574447,0.0017156992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944973,0.0000878284,0.00014893962,0.00011092006,0.000094754,0.00010782169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002802485,0.00008254852,0.000111555106,0.000029005223,0.0005112801,0.000047852423,0.00032542946,0.000042764797,0.00009156046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006305574,0.000047524023,0.00006265037,0.00017561282,0.00024967728,0.00032921665,0.000017430684,0.00071014854,0.000016297701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012301785,0.00011634192,0.014840236,0.000009082358,0.000101598715,0.0000015544337,0.02790233,0.000022043912,0.00053425314,0.94833267,0.001549912,0.00646699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020677117,0.0020038655,0.014025789,0.00025783826,0.0003628247,0.00059820915,0.33413666,0.0000053082317,0.0006199471,0.2723214,0.37266508,0.00093535334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081616204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008245967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67601126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024469526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013987886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4601443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259100371","doi":"10.3917/rffp.132.0053","title":"Les droits garantis par la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés dans l’administration et l’application du régime fiscal","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue française de finances publiques.","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Political science; Sanctions; Law; Constitution; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035146741824086884,"score_gpt":0.30702927813448927,"score_spread":0.2718825363104024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259100371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7638692,0.009092107,0.00825367,0.122662425,0.0012090084,0.0007444545,0.00020753007,0.00022781335,0.093733735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97949237,0.00573868,0.0012307065,0.0006505568,0.00095871993,0.00020824381,0.00010957941,0.000054732838,0.011556434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615556,0.00087384816,0.0006629617,0.00078349916,0.00042905554,0.0010950456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997532,0.0003703416,0.00043098186,0.0004644656,0.0004880597,0.00071415084],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031657275,0.0004296734,0.00054420443,0.00012008073,0.00060863554,0.00048008413,0.0007018186,0.0005722971,0.00009296117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009296935,0.0005004228,0.00020357368,0.0008476908,0.0011488367,0.0022919013,0.00008295434,0.00055174506,0.00013149694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010534488,0.0003304061,0.021352183,0.00038303187,0.000038307695,0.00016392852,0.039192498,0.00014209839,0.00012914088,0.8822519,0.014190986,0.041720167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041716624,0.00035250906,0.084411174,0.0007155601,0.00010364479,0.00019081014,0.00073179323,0.0014965853,0.00033896594,0.031097412,0.87951756,0.00062682986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08439629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19313382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8653266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065171754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013234763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259148470","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years of the Charter and Criminal Justice: A Dialogue between aCharter Optimist, a Charter Realist and a Charter Sceptic","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Skepticism; Political science; Law; Ambiguity; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Subject (documents); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.033901561681655396,"score_gpt":0.2928578853237201,"score_spread":0.25895632364206467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259148470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925792,0.000918845,0.00026972505,0.0050459094,0.00021118972,0.0002194139,0.000014176872,0.00001721526,0.00072429556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937472,0.0039030376,0.000047708432,0.00028354506,0.00085801963,0.0000073264873,0.000002099791,0.000017613324,0.0011334538],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971462,0.00025023828,0.00034536634,0.00027829164,0.00050674274,0.0014731877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914604,0.00012554022,0.00022083212,0.00020531926,0.00009994097,0.00020230794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014921849,0.0001788459,0.00029738224,0.00007812133,0.0009227179,0.00008711147,0.00035099415,0.00011883841,0.000054112385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011036308,0.00014134588,0.00012656875,0.00015077116,0.00086318457,0.00034545743,0.000077348115,0.0009833033,0.000011474307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009387858,0.0007146271,0.15134344,0.0006949178,0.0012271744,0.00021665872,0.4226987,0.00000662215,0.004685776,0.2267543,0.009208232,0.18151078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067478633,0.0033290633,0.7167246,0.0010532992,0.0051428922,0.0058507407,0.106807396,0.00017172779,0.0003494855,0.09661528,0.054535165,0.0026725244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080072944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017828743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5653811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020798254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081259914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7096893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259243144","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Canada’s Legal Aid Crisis: Breaching the Right to State-Funded Counsel within a Reasonable Time","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; Charter; Constitutional right; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; State (computer science); Representation (politics); Criminal procedure; Constitution; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.008845543556325292,"score_gpt":0.2649118013732611,"score_spread":0.2560662578169358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259243144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.674752,0.020689854,0.003016019,0.24322845,0.00250266,0.0014554344,0.000030012652,0.000086611304,0.054238986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484665,0.0006948066,0.000020706502,0.0004761578,0.00037637365,0.000006653128,4.3563622e-7,0.000012062722,0.013566129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958535,0.00041859076,0.000302454,0.00011647433,0.00084328355,0.0024657166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886465,0.00032881025,0.00021301181,0.00018874873,0.0001645307,0.00024022456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009560154,0.000120580306,0.00015658748,0.000024604768,0.0025343334,0.00018459199,0.0006816199,0.000038306986,0.000050140174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003073935,0.00006883338,0.000069935355,0.00020197073,0.00013161573,0.00042249105,0.000034720393,0.00108373,0.000019431081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029477864,0.00007201614,0.0006865961,0.00000598975,0.00019127487,0.0000060538705,0.021645846,0.00017992087,0.00024805937,0.8916088,0.08038815,0.0046725273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023184407,0.00013562074,0.00032536287,0.000048554382,0.00007841204,0.00020943662,0.049571533,0.0000404883,0.00024335519,0.046762746,0.90211606,0.00023657625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6518713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97231525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84484607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016864907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011626315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259265551","doi":"","title":"Tracking 'Terrorists' or Solidifying Tereotypes? Canada's Anti--Terrorism Act in Light of the Charter's Equality Guarantee","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Legislation; Law; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Charter; Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; History","score_opus":0.030528518366668218,"score_gpt":0.3108468360752404,"score_spread":0.2803183177085722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259265551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885597,0.0010656863,0.00013918568,0.005249701,0.0007245044,0.00016055588,0.0000016211634,0.000009727176,0.004089278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978244,0.0008635575,0.000008879985,0.00012574071,0.00017789684,0.0000022002102,1.8745659e-7,0.00001174264,0.0009854515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963059,0.0005940814,0.00045783335,0.00019149848,0.0006038478,0.0018468695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992385,0.000109384484,0.00029871933,0.00019514195,0.0000884151,0.000069843016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039468086,0.00014652488,0.0002655994,0.00005908214,0.0005820691,0.00006587124,0.0005572875,0.00008634259,0.00006973241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044384194,0.00010007402,0.00011720271,0.00034441397,0.0000993752,0.00028224898,0.0000248337,0.001247029,0.000002189604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043742778,0.00054492295,0.16303,0.0001696068,0.00035545105,0.0001580582,0.08417294,0.00010551151,0.0072173206,0.70713025,0.00093061535,0.035747875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041222135,0.0008422997,0.0676769,0.001854428,0.00035279497,0.001448971,0.36691266,0.00007796422,0.014073193,0.18360202,0.3566695,0.0023670774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30785632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014592455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01016422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259649106","doi":"","title":"To the Rescue: Antonio Lamer and the Section 2(B) Cases from Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Cornerstone; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Law; Freedom of expression; Political science; Expression (computer science); Sociology; History; Human rights; Business; Computer science; Archaeology; Advertising","score_opus":0.014922832080666824,"score_gpt":0.2971762142766932,"score_spread":0.2822533821960264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259649106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8328289,0.006218476,0.00056474097,0.15756108,0.00035782796,0.00018121304,0.0000011993752,0.000022619339,0.00226397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890401,0.004895423,0.000010743788,0.0011286243,0.0014416158,0.000002153278,3.04683e-7,0.0000036519946,0.003477434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982709,0.0003133132,0.00012515626,0.000118575816,0.00028724739,0.0008847505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948364,0.00023377655,0.000049856597,0.00010868582,0.000054986805,0.000069043694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002580622,0.00007216287,0.00009337909,0.000022657883,0.0013358289,0.00022774741,0.0002524864,0.000041016887,0.00003341999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030503073,0.00003800365,0.000056209734,0.00015476403,0.00016878793,0.00019709155,0.000016523867,0.00074991176,0.00001695523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048256823,0.0000315642,0.00060116395,8.1690234e-7,0.000057524707,0.000011262214,0.019649642,0.00003908477,0.00019228384,0.8133663,0.005200131,0.16036764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096122816,0.00049089594,0.013855794,0.0000590986,0.00015933768,0.00040910128,0.07430127,0.0000386808,0.000073820425,0.39416808,0.51517904,0.00030362647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15247062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7525871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6001165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036964758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009222314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259780296","doi":"","title":"The Trial Judge's Duty to Give Reasons for Judgment in Criminal Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Conviction; Supreme court; Law; Acquittal; Jury; Political science; Jury trial; Credibility; Trial court; Psychology","score_opus":0.11588454233110357,"score_gpt":0.4600192935085334,"score_spread":0.3441347511774298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259780296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7748438,0.00031484588,0.00021794393,0.19357309,0.0007287327,0.0015810954,0.000004749788,0.0000566406,0.028679103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990169,0.00006154454,0.0003885109,0.0007249169,0.00045552163,0.0000647626,6.7644805e-7,0.0000038882517,0.0081312135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989998,0.0000980495,0.000121561316,0.0001749742,0.00024707516,0.00035858213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894196,0.00069498236,0.00003816653,0.00014899916,0.00005503734,0.000120879944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009089587,0.0000746329,0.000108986234,0.000026432452,0.00057592534,0.00009883518,0.00022667335,0.000042743923,0.000035917375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001374145,0.000056391662,0.0000613897,0.00015316637,0.00008102976,0.00007313191,0.000019167655,0.00006916603,0.000029630912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028189594,0.00044457396,0.0002026081,0.000022661126,0.00001629969,0.00009892889,0.19283135,0.00004732164,0.00044743292,0.36763433,0.31331936,0.09674553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029969648,0.0011314304,0.0020627398,0.00005317275,0.000039902116,0.0000030572326,0.060499847,0.0000103062,0.0002908858,0.002943514,0.9297632,0.00020497668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008159714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028298326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6164439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012593964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014426355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260082425","doi":"","title":"Ten Ways to Improve Canadian Anti-Terrorism Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Conviction; Criminal law; National security; Immigration law; State (computer science); Immigration","score_opus":0.023104908033760457,"score_gpt":0.28016981903306787,"score_spread":0.2570649109993074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260082425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80288607,0.0020201127,0.001907608,0.05776401,0.001669906,0.00042231605,0.000008750898,0.00009517998,0.13322605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339277,0.0014070864,0.00008758428,0.0010730771,0.00086315395,0.0000035908974,6.5103774e-7,0.000012953055,0.003159135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996264,0.00006235004,0.00018094564,0.00018572356,0.00037393355,0.0029330375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908614,0.000033459735,0.00005594412,0.0001310165,0.00010801404,0.00058541965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014984573,0.00011006946,0.00014687995,0.00009724255,0.0018603591,0.00007689672,0.00044384014,0.00008796271,0.000107422726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010651999,0.00010269404,0.00009102515,0.00021503537,0.00015304128,0.00031342957,0.000021174474,0.0009463675,0.00025078477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009681239,0.000015394078,0.0009995366,0.000001310404,0.000023862915,0.000052681607,0.0051603555,0.000004496312,0.00025698144,0.9861926,0.002105143,0.0051780003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032632428,0.00044749008,0.001763748,0.000030540858,0.00003898507,0.00060985587,0.01481173,0.000005250919,0.00020156978,0.17714551,0.8041444,0.00047462824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6426032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95226747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80904704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018508037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071758106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260291965","doi":"","title":"“The Relevance of Prior Record in the Criminal Law: A Response to the Theory of Professor von Hirsch”","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Criminal law; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04442344463517078,"score_gpt":0.3273808466940629,"score_spread":0.28295740205889214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260291965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78353685,0.0011101955,0.00012595864,0.17931047,0.0008610647,0.0007832946,0.0000075756525,0.000016968906,0.034247626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502003,0.0004318982,0.0002530365,0.0009637876,0.0002855674,0.000019063844,6.1839295e-8,0.000009363039,0.0030171669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950673,0.0030751368,0.00052119215,0.0001471118,0.000778685,0.0004105499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555486,0.0034392169,0.0003313363,0.00035900666,0.00022446935,0.00009110244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010702736,0.00011474405,0.00019441744,0.000037025242,0.0015803183,0.000119647135,0.001130391,0.000071079514,0.00013707919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021137637,0.00005730705,0.00012999403,0.00031188552,0.00084412994,0.00025226708,0.000060633392,0.0005400546,0.000025949785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022438746,0.00012541565,0.00021080933,0.00002555697,0.000016700913,0.0000376698,0.06446055,0.000010138222,0.00027803789,0.89972705,0.007334201,0.02553001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033543044,0.0005269823,0.0032591396,0.00039312214,0.00006640797,0.000045690325,0.06299404,0.00000919568,0.0004524347,0.035607066,0.89614326,0.00016725801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036637632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019377572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008561995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010336332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260816901","doi":"","title":"Catastrophic Threats and the Fourth Amendment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Search and seizure; Supreme court; Harm; Reasonable suspicion; Law; Probable cause; Wonder; Political science; Element (criminal law); Government (linguistics); Terrorism; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053051317637785714,"score_gpt":0.38498951027609657,"score_spread":0.33193819263831087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260816901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7016196,0.0032826762,0.0006696132,0.23542455,0.00020817637,0.0003274252,0.0000010670304,0.000065913344,0.05840095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961417,0.0007157375,0.00027172695,0.00026308736,0.00010575991,0.0000066845864,2.553012e-7,0.0000024361855,0.002492626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995141,0.000043245567,0.000041604682,0.00008900836,0.00016345561,0.00014855487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997559,0.000058557882,0.00002049772,0.00009425111,0.000015012248,0.000055741722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033150846,0.000041292253,0.000058607235,0.000007553999,0.0003572555,0.000052735668,0.000100048404,0.000017394841,0.000049772818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036490783,0.00002632262,0.000019279905,0.00005756138,0.00040335848,0.000055168195,0.000027896742,0.000052328556,0.00004359361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058744343,0.000019954172,0.00027271482,0.0000063607513,0.000008525595,0.0000107912465,0.10007283,0.00006291411,0.00008301495,0.8913534,0.0008038565,0.007246844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005045311,0.00026032852,0.004805405,0.00020613504,0.00018281776,0.000029969138,0.1765,0.000024141471,0.001039313,0.27352303,0.5377647,0.0006188522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012536361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041983267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6178304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003899855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052785632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99403924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261008081","doi":"","title":"The need for clarity on whether 'suspects' may rely on section 35 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 : a comparative law analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; CLARITY; Law; Adversarial system; Duty; Political science; Section (typography); Interpretation (philosophy); The Republic; Constitutional law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09916064664287683,"score_gpt":0.3490144440462874,"score_spread":0.24985379740341057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261008081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84459245,0.0002208713,0.00031386362,0.0041763093,0.00088333566,0.0004130097,0.00021417186,0.000005663461,0.14918034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990477,0.000007691258,0.00006278035,0.000044816163,0.00016010621,0.0000048263864,9.691239e-7,0.0000031072625,0.00066799816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982747,0.0003431532,0.0005138155,0.00013332488,0.00060453295,0.00013048884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969003,0.0007913042,0.001145766,0.00018749632,0.00092517916,0.000049933504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001171506,0.000115079216,0.00033234255,0.00007717239,0.0006750887,0.00006037308,0.0005482548,0.00007454162,0.000043617063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019923829,0.000058331785,0.00034917658,0.00035173428,0.0017947095,0.00014238313,0.000050030816,0.00036596952,0.0000013600367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006423641,0.00016114638,0.0021753516,0.0000055294386,0.00044930915,1.5535026e-7,0.04433918,0.00023770756,0.001741441,0.9498011,0.00039469605,0.00005200924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039261156,0.002369672,0.04043558,0.0009092181,0.0022516076,0.000017436805,0.25819013,0.0021313955,0.028373802,0.14739989,0.51323736,0.0007578056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080604415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075386264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80240124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005198175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010544547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261035168","doi":"","title":"Legitimating Penal Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Public law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal procedure; Legitimacy; Subject (documents); Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07332613279523376,"score_gpt":0.4530018182184408,"score_spread":0.37967568542320707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261035168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09466735,0.00006520533,0.00103611,0.0047846367,0.00014546402,0.00005244308,1.5171825e-7,0.00006899879,0.89917964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98758817,0.000004246908,0.0015066807,0.00039999263,0.00030513696,8.16343e-7,3.0624628e-7,0.0000033323424,0.010191293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993808,0.000023865457,0.00006323348,0.000081024176,0.00020951408,0.00024153627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996543,0.00013912587,0.000025099389,0.000066248576,0.00003209175,0.00008315661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089037814,0.000036070178,0.000047738093,0.000011355584,0.00040066504,0.0000500641,0.00010709495,0.000029914396,0.00045846708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010853005,0.00003543184,0.000024621926,0.00008424204,0.00015228895,0.00012511462,0.000018129758,0.000060717277,0.00021445252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000783247,0.000010543804,0.000346654,0.000005968317,0.000001756285,0.000018931156,0.035670996,0.0000019480726,0.0007081409,0.9558374,0.003252943,0.0041368417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006162719,0.000017794284,0.0006761176,0.000027958917,0.0000062109507,0.0000026696773,0.038477127,0.0000095913365,0.0008677304,0.0025476846,0.9571963,0.00010921276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016761295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015336874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036629943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030184246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98978615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261125889","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v30i3.12409","title":"THE REVISED CANADIAN TEST FOR THE EXCLUSION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OBTAINED EVIDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Constitution; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06271134722376055,"score_gpt":0.34468097125984165,"score_spread":0.2819696240360811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261125889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04464972,0.026536362,0.0019710336,0.79993117,0.0028145423,0.0021652854,0.000116542324,0.00006583637,0.12174952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168104,0.00055561226,0.0001651326,0.0009755598,0.00018462383,0.00002201295,0.000001636748,0.0000025590189,0.0064118383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931747,0.00006817546,0.000119456054,0.00010318751,0.00020198655,0.00018974305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629927,0.00309501,0.000041348136,0.00017539757,0.00031561597,0.00007336172],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094033516,0.000043278487,0.00005909012,0.000010587645,0.0013059794,0.0000824508,0.00025662832,0.000031812815,0.00016018885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004081686,0.00002488039,0.00006211196,0.00015840109,0.00036212264,0.00011297996,0.000030113497,0.000047438825,0.000015100557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006627565,0.0000426771,0.015892148,0.00009930139,0.000036502286,0.000028502805,0.008299366,0.000042868316,0.004296286,0.8144263,0.11969761,0.037072156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005024646,0.000013864435,0.0039057233,0.00015735105,0.000021765083,0.0000017449959,0.0011577896,0.000043321867,0.0002155554,0.0016023545,0.99277985,0.00005044363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04682809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5291475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008637422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014908238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261591876","doi":"","title":"Judicial and Prosecutorial Control of Lying by the Police","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Deception; Political science; Exclusionary rule; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Supreme court; Medicine","score_opus":0.010529202448625685,"score_gpt":0.28608895387092775,"score_spread":0.27555975142230205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261591876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9485016,0.0050811716,0.005826199,0.03485584,0.0009057154,0.0003062667,0.000008183629,0.0000250828,0.004489973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568456,0.0021775234,0.0000030721947,0.00007637654,0.0013200123,0.0000021730202,4.6518377e-8,0.0000046151345,0.0007316265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983395,0.0001630314,0.00015150955,0.00008293267,0.0002906994,0.00097234716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994581,0.00023308548,0.000120632656,0.000056760462,0.00007188199,0.000059538896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023864333,0.000057504476,0.000102956175,0.000018664135,0.0005171923,0.000038253096,0.00020840466,0.000044860586,0.000018798106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020720842,0.000030742158,0.000044717664,0.000067099936,0.00029025692,0.00017963508,0.000014075568,0.00031224018,0.0000037604948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022206755,0.000027249165,0.0029840043,0.0000028413747,0.00006638097,4.6295003e-7,0.005176538,1.699367e-7,0.01225416,0.9005185,0.0014214598,0.07732617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042515346,0.0011179213,0.0012610895,0.00016834249,0.00024629317,0.00020658721,0.033571523,0.000006477138,0.0011401504,0.6753324,0.28223744,0.00046023048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005469609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009523523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.280816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023320572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011500024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8268449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261915661","doi":"","title":"Statutory Immunity from Charter Damages: Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Charter; Damages; Political science","score_opus":0.027053999608283433,"score_gpt":0.28911640601084104,"score_spread":0.2620624064025576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261915661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233721,0.008152686,0.0016658123,0.009189219,0.0014257848,0.00011275641,0.000008069396,0.00008055322,0.055993035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768162,0.0018879913,0.000031957752,0.0002612467,0.001142561,0.0000029902524,0.000006910609,0.000017446273,0.019832712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996644,0.0004257468,0.0002474253,0.00019370152,0.0005725633,0.0019165596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891496,0.0001553336,0.00015184167,0.00025236694,0.00017698001,0.00034853548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022087009,0.00014539553,0.00018714953,0.00006039725,0.0006363504,0.00016183163,0.0005897948,0.000113973874,0.00020698307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025373686,0.0001333077,0.00010650612,0.00014995286,0.00022075325,0.0006089396,0.000057438276,0.001053164,0.00010365105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018909412,0.00012993476,0.0037996327,0.0000023312666,0.00018060688,0.000015107012,0.015383271,0.000008715754,0.0003254813,0.93337715,0.009297137,0.037291534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005604754,0.00025369707,0.0011260854,0.00003673963,0.00006078415,0.000038412938,0.031702336,0.000019240799,0.00007356649,0.2940231,0.67178965,0.00031593454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11989141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25111717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6624925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013588391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051867063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9200994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261919887","doi":"","title":"A Plea to Reject the United States Supreme Court's Due-Process Review of Punitive Damages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Law; Windsor; Political science; Due Process Clause; Mistake; Common law; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.020781998655695192,"score_gpt":0.34253579625397623,"score_spread":0.32175379759828104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261919887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759442,0.012848222,0.00057208905,0.104187645,0.0003902299,0.0005741849,0.000012500461,0.000047418067,0.0054235277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91827625,0.07916982,0.00002711031,0.001339448,0.00028319508,0.0000087875815,0.000004813199,0.000012439436,0.00087811524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972299,0.00034254263,0.0003030987,0.00015135927,0.0005919525,0.0013811702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984506,0.0003496392,0.00021260548,0.00019195829,0.000651604,0.00014363462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00602433,0.00012548646,0.00023046312,0.00009783041,0.0006899725,0.0000767623,0.0007655992,0.000056750712,0.00020520626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014908399,0.00008485144,0.00010193107,0.00072036166,0.00029681678,0.00024161737,0.0000404529,0.0016815913,0.00002311343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002828117,0.00023853633,0.001971519,0.00084438355,0.00032558173,0.000029472358,0.04015324,0.00007064387,0.00168463,0.9133555,0.013653594,0.027390085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005905398,0.0011298291,0.0014186735,0.0043255384,0.00038536455,0.0004307749,0.17072055,0.000048040612,0.0010522791,0.29177168,0.52738494,0.00074177096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004250682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03544789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6215838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018523225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024216208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262318772","doi":"","title":"The Fiscal Impact of Changes to Eligibility for Conditional Sentences of Imprisonment in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05192891126289238,"score_gpt":0.4067442219223407,"score_spread":0.3548153106594483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262318772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923626,0.00008428698,0.000049129307,0.006283681,0.00007648185,0.00019987847,0.00004332704,0.0000013331882,0.0008992569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997037,0.000018301329,0.00006597407,0.00006216159,0.000043769345,0.0000149057005,0.0000012587768,8.4247864e-7,0.00008907464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938744,0.000035766898,0.00011293746,0.000052081963,0.00022097379,0.00019082092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993692,0.00042124145,0.000040361345,0.0000565962,0.000039633804,0.000072940085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065549754,0.0000319912,0.00007705461,0.0000091840375,0.00007929488,0.00000417921,0.00010757468,0.000012429469,0.00009962215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018650024,0.000019087618,0.000032145806,0.00006186487,0.00008692231,0.00005129621,0.000017093986,0.000016801732,4.7059046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008666623,0.00006997964,0.9421933,0.000022172926,0.000016030795,1.1391373e-7,0.0056486046,0.000036156904,0.00069674914,0.022624733,0.02448452,0.0041209213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008116553,0.00010997493,0.96270794,0.000011870529,0.0000064134,1.8035487e-7,0.020162001,0.000028627825,0.0022575168,0.0014192933,0.013148475,0.00006655737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97705907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021205438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024542224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039982426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10907927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262521744","doi":"","title":"Unreliable Evidence and Wrongful Convictions: The Case for Excluding Tainted Identification Evidence and Jailhouse and Coerced Confessions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Eyewitness identification; Political science; Hearsay; Confession (law); Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Jury; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.10938419417523636,"score_gpt":0.3736123377119432,"score_spread":0.2642281435367068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262521744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94906396,0.028288545,0.0068764216,0.014913495,0.00021444664,0.00053939497,0.0000027426443,0.000039658215,0.00006132979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157531,0.08233047,0.00008052183,0.00010550316,0.00016593825,0.000031462994,3.816497e-7,0.000010840337,0.0015217487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997878,0.00028843153,0.0003106284,0.00028488325,0.00023218965,0.0010058584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973218,0.0018964452,0.00020515046,0.00014575964,0.00027007458,0.00016080464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043666135,0.00013114176,0.00016335241,0.00007167528,0.0044259056,0.0002615387,0.00018293558,0.00008252406,0.000012847895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027833518,0.00010097881,0.00004413075,0.00019079875,0.0007260726,0.0010874426,0.000055660254,0.0006417669,0.0000028493473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062397454,0.00016971074,0.02631882,0.00020750065,0.00028614287,0.00025324116,0.06543591,0.000055220284,0.00938293,0.85538155,0.004322525,0.03756245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00282806,0.0018198565,0.016986962,0.0036066293,0.0012443683,0.059089467,0.58880985,0.0053683147,0.00061147736,0.28601032,0.031929165,0.001695562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042415247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013912205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5693713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037957254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012624093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262618429","doi":"","title":"The Charter and Administrative Law: Cross-Fertilization in Public Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Common law; Administrative law; Public law; Jurisprudence; Judicial review","score_opus":0.06334033959590497,"score_gpt":0.35704202823780834,"score_spread":0.2937016886419034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262618429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93413466,0.0032561936,0.00015213978,0.02007705,0.00016794851,0.00014303895,6.986392e-7,0.000020967702,0.0420473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917077,0.0061461586,0.0000044145672,0.0002186164,0.00016445809,0.0000040305813,4.281378e-7,0.0000047535564,0.0017494723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816084,0.00017201007,0.00016887183,0.000111044035,0.00025191458,0.0011353174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995897,0.00011349185,0.00006788572,0.000063734384,0.000086387176,0.00007880687],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018087574,0.00006620341,0.000074685755,0.000020358724,0.0020337643,0.00024426682,0.00018459641,0.000051045463,0.000017290084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001155422,0.000047847294,0.000031186355,0.00012093325,0.00069385755,0.0005703295,0.000016043085,0.0005975117,0.0000090445565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024284043,0.000014055828,0.0037846782,6.6698e-7,0.0000061924443,0.000003892045,0.0026126662,3.6469206e-7,0.000012715818,0.9924473,0.000026725136,0.0010664271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000539314,0.00031949993,0.014287222,0.00002241223,0.000010039445,0.00035514947,0.016300272,0.000023648152,0.000057629077,0.77736175,0.19050407,0.00021900161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016274294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20411666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2150856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003226963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013110894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263245835","doi":"","title":"Review Essay of Mark Ribeiro, Limiting Arbitrary Power: The Vagueness Doctrine in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Doctrine; Law; Statutory law; Notice; Constitutional law; Political science; Discretion; Premise; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02228272235619991,"score_gpt":0.2938384146666561,"score_spread":0.2715556923104562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263245835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23116978,0.3347933,0.00017267844,0.07472072,0.0007389459,0.000757811,0.000016992624,0.000037117803,0.35759267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9156259,0.08271815,0.000015987222,0.0011997558,0.00014935917,0.000003902858,0.0000013620499,0.0000041495273,0.00028144277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972162,0.00029574762,0.0003492625,0.0001290822,0.00035937174,0.0016503093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992677,0.00018603167,0.00014702449,0.00011395609,0.00011585026,0.0001694532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00453262,0.00009923293,0.00020323502,0.000068612964,0.0009689525,0.00002154709,0.0004202532,0.000056195488,0.0001267157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030212235,0.00007618226,0.00010485046,0.00034331993,0.00097434025,0.00025510587,0.000018395565,0.0010854152,0.000013199423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009241921,0.000016434506,0.005451195,0.00002130488,0.00001609095,0.000027064862,0.00042897576,0.000005072852,0.000007857616,0.99292356,0.00026660974,0.00082661834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006715785,0.00019350041,0.006235423,0.0025588856,0.0000996825,0.0027597225,0.005128515,0.0000080669715,0.00005121623,0.1878017,0.793976,0.0005156936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30873847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84837055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80512184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012657061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017802685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263667907","doi":"","title":"Victim Privacy and the Open Court Principle","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Administration of justice; Openness to experience; Criminal justice; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.0496707106092654,"score_gpt":0.37308633632950483,"score_spread":0.3234156257202394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263667907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17291276,0.00007025919,0.00007183593,0.108336285,0.00008440495,0.0006589534,1.9141883e-7,0.000029917015,0.71783537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764198,0.000082925435,0.0004767688,0.0010443368,0.000062549094,0.000032559405,1.13797206e-7,0.0000020036803,0.021878954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995176,0.0000726569,0.000064298205,0.0000896163,0.00012888084,0.00012691205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958944,0.00017349776,0.000019879679,0.00011576298,0.0000413675,0.000060075807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000619679,0.0000332399,0.00006170876,0.000004930346,0.00046349177,0.00040986613,0.00043436832,0.00001972596,0.0019829345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001801417,0.000018116465,0.000013091235,0.000051156316,0.0003018947,0.00041751465,0.0002542193,0.00003916376,0.00023418911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011424131,0.0000112731195,0.002783484,0.0000025744057,0.0000044694902,4.184413e-7,0.013002973,2.4736093e-7,0.000013648961,0.9527125,0.026555706,0.004901289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023841552,0.000009177821,0.009243078,0.000005815831,0.000005934044,7.554552e-7,0.005136288,0.000065706445,0.000018553752,0.017649643,0.9675712,0.000055406916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038356602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025969478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94101554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011612934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045276443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264764557","doi":"","title":"Ignorance of Law, Criminal Culpability and Moral Innocence: Striking A Balance Between Blame and Excuse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Ignorance; Excuse; Culpability; Political science; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Maxim; Civil law (Civil law); Blame; Mistake; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04672827736169968,"score_gpt":0.30913434348503466,"score_spread":0.26240606612333495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264764557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98961866,0.006106633,0.00032411193,0.0017813413,0.00005327948,0.000101701145,0.000004862285,0.000017341263,0.001992099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261564,0.006739196,0.00011815983,0.000040742918,0.00026033717,0.0000017600316,2.9337343e-7,0.0000073876276,0.00021650348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761254,0.00018522498,0.0002986671,0.00022944782,0.00039633794,0.0012777899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992791,0.00015180004,0.0001804674,0.00011430413,0.00013092371,0.00014341492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021294076,0.00012512649,0.00025062385,0.000046132514,0.0005483059,0.0000784,0.000239745,0.00008383354,0.00003470395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020071903,0.00011756357,0.00004968464,0.0001713925,0.00075709564,0.00053423544,0.000045822235,0.0008396727,0.0000017428011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006392334,0.000080213606,0.21668053,0.00007735269,0.000058052883,0.000008308794,0.01621489,0.0000034018258,0.00024723524,0.70957166,0.00007324816,0.05692121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002073976,0.0015096568,0.09499071,0.00048242832,0.00042243162,0.0003761738,0.057656873,0.00026049328,0.00037562207,0.82584965,0.014934198,0.0010677848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017749133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033872956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12168982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024799161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032927084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47941032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265427457","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1120","title":"Offence Definitions, Conclusive Presumptions, and Slot Machines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Normative; Nothing; Function (biology); Law; Criminal law; Position (finance); Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.047114428625259434,"score_gpt":0.32527035994316905,"score_spread":0.2781559313179096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265427457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12674402,0.0013840782,0.00041056954,0.023690758,0.0016556468,0.00021671667,0.00002995363,0.000096339805,0.8457719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942148,0.0018760756,0.00225507,0.0005044415,0.000675836,0.0000058189526,0.0000025272132,0.000009035844,0.00045643313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880457,0.00014559439,0.0002154101,0.00016614905,0.00036192272,0.00030633953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903554,0.00025021014,0.0001207791,0.00012722057,0.00016679813,0.00029945717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007967542,0.00010774244,0.00013186644,0.000037026635,0.0026731025,0.00035525172,0.00027059935,0.00009901598,0.000678801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026820792,0.00009618724,0.00006229656,0.000073590025,0.0006448211,0.00054405816,0.00006707001,0.00054098445,0.00006801926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012620297,0.00003065853,0.0011035277,0.000006527238,0.000008769392,0.000034577344,0.0015842189,0.000002320256,0.0008137218,0.99191386,0.0014401879,0.0030490127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005095524,0.00009406587,0.005820084,0.00012049487,0.00009114231,0.00094069244,0.0027922809,0.000112896174,0.00018684953,0.7648658,0.22406434,0.00040176866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037500586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3452021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86747074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025867892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009859774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265627871","doi":"","title":"Sentencing of Terrorism Offences after 9/11: A Comparative Review of Early Case Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Discretion; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type); Terrorism; Sentence; Common law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.11495337160992988,"score_gpt":0.4155493845721682,"score_spread":0.30059601296223837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265627871","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036263702,0.99735457,0.00003730477,0.0001612586,0.00028387117,0.00046119225,0.000012122398,0.000008577567,0.0013184599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04554726,0.95351404,0.00003578374,0.00003440783,0.0004528642,0.000021546804,0.0000019556514,0.000016964379,0.0003751914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514943,0.0010256161,0.00112015,0.00023143341,0.00069080276,0.0017825618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754095,0.00029192888,0.0014622941,0.0002312712,0.00029997958,0.00017359508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005452692,0.0003183654,0.0018487558,0.00011385908,0.00029499587,0.000032560452,0.0005421067,0.00019061187,0.00013648518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008774628,0.00023667343,0.0007914883,0.00040078606,0.00050799403,0.00042999673,0.0000649214,0.001605247,0.00002129085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031627416,0.00017367299,0.00007336742,0.06277073,0.000678157,0.0002188242,0.010193962,7.0344484e-8,4.2344897e-7,0.23768318,0.000166581,0.6880094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000676954,0.00020701847,0.0000013755318,0.098347336,0.0021637557,0.0027896017,0.0073056575,9.8184806e-8,5.641734e-7,0.0019008884,0.88690025,0.00031578093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012402739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044435635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88673365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007085958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004485101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99417377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266333732","doi":"","title":"Social Hosts' Responsibility for Their Intoxicated Guests: Where Courts Fear to Tread","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Duty of care; Supreme court; Law; Duty; Duty to protect; Political science; High Court; Business","score_opus":0.07011957761425468,"score_gpt":0.4149698103921388,"score_spread":0.3448502327778841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266333732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8744921,0.00007204902,0.0022235964,0.04437481,0.0002984024,0.0008460237,0.000017462557,0.00023779165,0.07743776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98909104,0.00001076312,0.0009342,0.00066510815,0.00049043866,0.000014477216,0.0000025201969,0.000009099492,0.008782356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986611,0.00011387032,0.00021172182,0.00028629205,0.00026316807,0.00046387198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879634,0.0005869259,0.00004514471,0.00016021464,0.00020751737,0.00020386178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030419272,0.000104368075,0.00015836829,0.00004738213,0.00072142837,0.00007688611,0.00027101501,0.00012937807,0.00023905994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007400881,0.000086521606,0.00009770463,0.00023950454,0.00020258686,0.00016185647,0.000041185733,0.00007718376,0.00008555653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002864269,0.00044112327,0.0052242866,0.000071378425,0.000044546225,0.000016171147,0.15091428,0.0000010116315,0.008196706,0.42055067,0.29424325,0.117432326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025628312,0.00019622422,0.016957976,0.000025143767,0.000017226943,6.6869654e-7,0.026653096,0.000004871304,0.003371708,0.014232099,0.93800646,0.0002782529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004472279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07020569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6437632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019322753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001649635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94676065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266499148","doi":"","title":"Invading the Mind: The Right to Privacy and the Definition of Terrorism in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Terrorism; Jurisprudence; Political science; Legislation; Law; Right to privacy; Order (exchange); Element (criminal law); Information privacy; Ideology; Economic Justice; Politics; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.018403554709919844,"score_gpt":0.275938584849652,"score_spread":0.25753503013973217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266499148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95547664,0.0012426688,0.00030244922,0.039326653,0.00014742113,0.00014848194,3.8628684e-7,0.0000010786551,0.003354196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985579,0.0007578571,0.000012912085,0.00036689176,0.00013795253,0.0000019714428,8.919845e-8,0.00000273403,0.00016165328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984123,0.00019746962,0.00018978486,0.00006731502,0.00031010958,0.0008229843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999171,0.0005697271,0.00009519813,0.000086511885,0.000035157853,0.000042411793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069052344,0.000051500043,0.000080746926,0.000026004413,0.00059260183,0.000038372622,0.00035920955,0.000020121615,0.000014280317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028650972,0.00002343378,0.000027913751,0.00018639977,0.00016454846,0.00008649062,0.000030471356,0.0006476905,0.0000012687996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015402825,0.000011424154,0.0076620216,0.0000027448416,0.000027109983,0.000006583914,0.029020425,0.000008736364,0.00010107441,0.9329381,0.00039452044,0.02967324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084744615,0.00011761059,0.02036191,0.000100318146,0.000069446956,0.00020618652,0.23718692,0.000019264859,0.00032755238,0.6761619,0.064402126,0.00019933996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81329215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2567762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082682754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031251498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55438817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266793662","doi":"","title":"Section 24(1) of the Charter: Strategy and Structure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Charter; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Discretion; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Appeal","score_opus":0.019074150281520014,"score_gpt":0.27043555486646936,"score_spread":0.2513614045849494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266793662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943336,0.0014362473,0.000054919696,0.0016382996,0.00026690614,0.000048849688,8.456453e-7,0.000006105233,0.002214203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323773,0.0043375916,0.000004730379,0.000029214747,0.00037217818,2.8898336e-7,1.04636975e-7,0.0000031061227,0.0020150535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891365,0.0000966108,0.00010199072,0.000068425325,0.00022191108,0.0005973923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997474,0.00002020288,0.00008424013,0.000059292488,0.000051144536,0.00003772161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048148728,0.000047873247,0.00006844794,0.000019528976,0.0006787077,0.00001884626,0.00014616609,0.000048112986,0.000035584202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035490528,0.00003222961,0.000042134197,0.00010480599,0.00019730174,0.0001577865,0.000012242223,0.0006306242,7.945365e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079810794,0.000044818757,0.03255735,0.000014831093,0.00009148818,0.0000048317797,0.015926313,0.000046224413,0.007898801,0.91036075,0.0012003784,0.031774394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010906833,0.0009928263,0.095179595,0.00010271935,0.00014100438,0.003701697,0.05941584,0.00003527702,0.001743599,0.7357779,0.10130611,0.0005127408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096475723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014564838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17458285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001558985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001132981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8127521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267406232","doi":"","title":"A Constitutional 'Work in Progress'? The Charter and the Limits of Progressive Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Interpretation (philosophy); Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial interpretation; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020609082498623654,"score_gpt":0.3075890471431205,"score_spread":0.2869799646444969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267406232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310521,0.022825727,0.00051709206,0.042204604,0.0001778306,0.00048688625,7.048976e-7,0.000010865159,0.0027241844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676853,0.0028605761,0.000020158048,0.00007823923,0.0001318242,0.000015392476,2.2552926e-7,0.0000017262638,0.0001233021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866027,0.000259562,0.00016953383,0.000075366275,0.00027028407,0.00056497206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995058,0.00019441113,0.00013499118,0.00005234501,0.0000863864,0.000026057029],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002032986,0.00005442779,0.00009515371,0.00002228408,0.0005331518,0.00003139679,0.00018563427,0.000032135496,0.000011452623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019029017,0.000028589717,0.00004523644,0.00016700434,0.0031921295,0.00016663097,0.000014565031,0.00056783145,0.0000025061395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003722472,0.000026731603,0.010961498,0.0000024193337,0.000026707625,0.0000046908253,0.01857806,0.0000037212253,0.0000021706633,0.95092636,0.000062598316,0.01903278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007089528,0.0009779945,0.07065043,0.0010959881,0.00024224854,0.0035361417,0.10500817,0.00041037233,0.00012329049,0.77839434,0.031789448,0.0006820713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009866482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012348411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17253205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013363714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011860196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267630323","doi":"","title":"Twenty Years in Charterland: One Westminster Country's Experience with an Entrenched Bill of Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Just policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Bill of rights; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04037486354295924,"score_gpt":0.3606532972281062,"score_spread":0.32027843368514697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267630323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861166,0.000019440593,0.000014131945,0.0006327664,0.000065853856,0.00012362139,0.0000051725538,0.000020646714,0.013001752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868655,0.00001783696,0.00013012432,0.00020729218,0.0003228263,0.0000044381213,0.000002456908,0.000004798244,0.00062368053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884695,0.000046556346,0.00019471273,0.00018284474,0.00035988237,0.0003690479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994922,0.000050831364,0.000079269244,0.00018332533,0.0000427699,0.00015155869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036919222,0.000080604346,0.00014701427,0.00013418132,0.00008894727,0.00003052767,0.00022200959,0.00006768438,0.00015272449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036181475,0.000060452752,0.000020225385,0.00041837423,0.00032549642,0.0003317,0.000018180863,0.000075722586,0.000019311832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048083175,0.0008799072,0.09277693,0.00005769628,0.000019399538,0.0001432566,0.78858036,0.000007008645,0.0020108337,0.10245568,0.0005842119,0.012003871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018041998,0.00094907155,0.67313635,0.00038459088,0.000040660354,0.000011982156,0.060872626,0.000022189191,0.0034470556,0.0035057312,0.25505877,0.00076676306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1750895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11957406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72770774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009540294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013120001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8964914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267942469","doi":"","title":"Did September 11 Really Change Everything: Preserving Canadian Values in the Face of Terrorism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Democracy; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Dissent; Criminal law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.05898891311412934,"score_gpt":0.3157298285722342,"score_spread":0.25674091545810485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267942469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96958524,0.0024785723,0.000039536142,0.0136533305,0.00016665812,0.00019560936,0.000001462424,0.000010258426,0.0138693275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941446,0.0030307593,0.000014495127,0.00025343365,0.00035957756,0.000005960599,6.2295277e-7,0.000007974689,0.0021825403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971709,0.00034867763,0.00022277141,0.00012855638,0.0004880816,0.0016409787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943423,0.00010927762,0.00011565277,0.00014761426,0.00007335471,0.00011984376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036041136,0.00009237206,0.00013829024,0.00010596329,0.00071342743,0.000038723465,0.000671353,0.00007795581,0.000054053173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000184786,0.0000703485,0.00007991617,0.0002680091,0.00014189296,0.00045511988,0.00002483237,0.0008870826,0.000010310615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064166336,0.00016104539,0.22783859,0.00003669281,0.00009816013,0.00020922476,0.6278581,0.000075343414,0.00012150579,0.12603106,0.008957976,0.008548152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085193786,0.000575724,0.17508216,0.00038340766,0.000104750914,0.0012157295,0.43011147,0.00013268659,0.00006088657,0.16556935,0.22512083,0.000791072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61970806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96217644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34246838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079700956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033163514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5883065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268518203","doi":"","title":"New Clouds on the Legality of Unilateral Conduct in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.0515209685268091,"score_gpt":0.3103969746571791,"score_spread":0.25887600613037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268518203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574779,0.000054786717,0.000005234121,0.0099135,0.0002071021,0.00006632849,0.000001442753,0.0000062332406,0.03226742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987077,0.000017040806,0.000015263418,0.000516742,0.00009933871,7.365277e-7,3.9407732e-7,0.0000029684468,0.00063980155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992005,0.00013616003,0.00012403047,0.00010380935,0.0002269403,0.00020855863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995567,0.00015877014,0.00004235641,0.00016560378,0.000022382957,0.000054195436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050797214,0.00004968131,0.00009824618,0.000009480222,0.00012598508,0.00001906671,0.00024300802,0.000023698272,0.0004973716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011892761,0.000036463305,0.000023983739,0.0001429343,0.0000998827,0.00009130456,0.000023203107,0.00009062944,0.000015146052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000276114,0.000025796278,0.076340966,0.000020151656,0.0000073274114,0.0000052575697,0.0022769072,0.00008462934,0.00065662205,0.8739886,0.040205315,0.0063607823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049403525,0.00011071255,0.22233516,0.0001259183,0.000013842297,9.774303e-7,0.0032684102,0.0003111618,0.0085823685,0.0055863108,0.75891453,0.0002565519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99447286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99475664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025531178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015339276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.544587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268700288","doi":"","title":"Compte-rendu de l'ouvrage : « Traité de sécurité intérieure, sous la direction de Maurice Cusson, Benoît Dupont et Frédéric Lemieux, Montréal, Editions Hurtubise HMH, coll. « Cahiers du Québec : Droit et criminologie », 2007 ; Lausanne, Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, coll. « Sciences forensiques », 2008 »","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030801460760787575,"score_gpt":0.2739969433715005,"score_spread":0.24319548261071292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268700288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665945,0.03956948,0.0042826077,0.027996093,0.0005196878,0.0011098325,0.0002915772,0.00036046057,0.05927577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7965259,0.19698502,0.004384127,0.0002916464,0.00008345651,0.000004496954,0.000015997342,0.000016575414,0.001692783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962278,0.0015083733,0.0003271511,0.0006882029,0.0005278759,0.0007206163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974354,0.0010179145,0.00046277727,0.0002845658,0.0003540514,0.00044532202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016866691,0.0003766022,0.0005572857,0.0028018167,0.0037971423,0.0003628678,0.0010701648,0.0005025638,0.00011847036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020414715,0.00045064065,0.00032120876,0.005647663,0.00497716,0.0029494185,0.00038372647,0.0005557288,0.0000023375078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005813314,0.0009549193,0.15131892,0.00020510497,0.000312998,0.0011485902,0.015462666,0.00031471538,0.001711604,0.02253618,0.8048025,0.0006504692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020658213,0.003008016,0.6644186,0.0021242138,0.0017695781,0.0015670403,0.0721651,0.0006806508,0.0033521168,0.008398988,0.238388,0.0020619088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64958996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070087306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57950264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021850035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016067554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269205455","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Anti-Terrorism Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Presumption of innocence; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Proportionality (law); Criminal code; Punishment (psychology); Racial profiling; Criminology; Sociology; Race (biology); Psychology","score_opus":0.022527174020868262,"score_gpt":0.26826550703922347,"score_spread":0.2457383330183552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269205455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27198845,0.030256046,0.0012885071,0.33562177,0.0033260072,0.00036736883,0.0000049077107,0.00015645057,0.35699052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967314,0.0040645767,0.000019443996,0.00074837013,0.0010276712,5.19579e-7,2.4001213e-7,0.000008549306,0.026816597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970668,0.000089110385,0.00016266879,0.0001278666,0.0004885945,0.002064989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00004372705,0.0000770122,0.00009770731,0.00005018724,0.00023659664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008399521,0.0000902284,0.00011870517,0.000024088597,0.00082088745,0.000095648684,0.0003578173,0.00005372859,0.0005481937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068604626,0.00008436585,0.00006225738,0.00013646412,0.00008392357,0.00024950705,0.000016347103,0.00092504744,0.00006422073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036592248,0.000016119038,0.00037026827,0.0000012668996,0.000024459758,0.000020195715,0.0010717646,0.0000054065285,0.00002470677,0.948356,0.03307355,0.017032644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015748723,0.000057051122,0.00014086868,0.000013933084,0.000020883252,0.000115199895,0.003957394,0.000008481834,0.000017793365,0.06592821,0.9294348,0.00014789563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94005364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89636123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014179741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006349975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269595583","doi":"","title":"Better Late than Never: The Canadian Parliamentary Review of the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Political science; Terrorism; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02270312633931941,"score_gpt":0.2815574291146427,"score_spread":0.2588543027753233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269595583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7538868,0.036345225,0.0000074366276,0.20400271,0.0005025234,0.00027773122,0.0000031397042,0.000009394019,0.004965019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8839829,0.1098031,0.0000041148073,0.0047228206,0.00029718896,0.0000021105166,4.7709295e-7,0.0000066113935,0.0011807036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997537,0.00032283922,0.00022160482,0.000103106555,0.0004721449,0.0013432592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994044,0.00005127237,0.00016064732,0.00019804618,0.00007242375,0.00011321408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023485785,0.0000920774,0.00014846164,0.000026770987,0.0017104758,0.000028539716,0.0007045503,0.0000477656,0.0001416304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000812128,0.000051035484,0.00017724409,0.00021344649,0.00031148145,0.00024404813,0.000028825618,0.0010684326,0.00002144739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083076884,0.0002476617,0.49784058,0.0005909303,0.0011334475,0.0001743419,0.051373158,0.000026748698,0.00037335168,0.17433633,0.15426403,0.11955634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030999785,0.00016222504,0.08730408,0.0019807087,0.00024554148,0.0006783619,0.006816637,0.0000042847346,0.00010187174,0.038097765,0.86390436,0.0003941702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3723245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8555468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7096403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082326075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057184906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269709512","doi":"","title":"The Application of Section 24(2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in a Civil Action","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scrutiny; Political science; Realm; Law; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.018814127902786772,"score_gpt":0.2903531990119211,"score_spread":0.27153907110913433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269709512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831524,0.00004073571,0.00035255594,0.0008666892,0.00008609252,0.000132812,5.4450487e-7,0.000003409522,0.01536478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940276,0.000014549886,0.000012363748,0.000003927548,0.000047233105,0.000004729135,1.4612071e-7,6.945638e-7,0.0005136198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963355,0.00004415283,0.000109111585,0.000046233996,0.00012200996,0.000044929304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973494,0.00007142006,0.0000812126,0.00006891649,0.000038095153,0.000005394256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774407,0.000020161711,0.000042463238,0.000012429947,0.00009604722,0.000004550406,0.00006040568,0.000026394648,0.000008567196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011824028,0.000010748616,0.000017135502,0.00011792298,0.0002104463,0.000067769455,0.000008317115,0.00002559538,3.0728197e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108574604,0.0002064134,0.075750016,0.00008680352,0.0000108074155,7.374396e-8,0.012440594,0.00006553617,0.1247288,0.7661611,0.003664234,0.016777046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042640488,0.00010173646,0.70666426,0.000091729504,0.000037674312,0.0000011868296,0.0072133443,0.0009347519,0.07913901,0.13183653,0.07342034,0.00013305263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08038054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30441293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63432455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012132263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011975134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9257433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269810752","doi":"","title":"Admissibility of Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Reports","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Presumption; Commission; Law; Political science; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.020713446846291984,"score_gpt":0.3217402286989018,"score_spread":0.3010267818526098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269810752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99129516,0.00039143203,0.000048473164,0.00048807616,0.00015789107,0.00006251969,1.9328262e-7,0.000005116721,0.007551157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973623,0.00020385621,0.00014419649,0.0000056421063,0.00007248709,4.138422e-7,1.76811e-7,0.0000032875103,0.002207644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861246,0.0000623938,0.0003007085,0.00011117322,0.0002924777,0.0006207871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929327,0.000066317865,0.00027689454,0.00012899043,0.00012107978,0.00011342773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040232926,0.00005756269,0.00014649924,0.000034012686,0.00023657603,0.000016578155,0.00012139424,0.0000685315,0.0001225967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044736275,0.00004897032,0.00005814577,0.00006705914,0.00019407853,0.00016950908,0.000026705076,0.0009691046,3.312044e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001767113,0.000234856,0.6481869,0.000052271178,0.000076436096,0.000023645236,0.027368255,0.0000019502459,0.043747302,0.20834194,0.00016115955,0.071628526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067032874,0.000745367,0.1496953,0.00022230968,0.00016718973,0.0011732272,0.017159512,0.000010676276,0.007754276,0.7305104,0.09149453,0.00039688707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070428565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59504586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5246173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029815626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056843315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272155419","doi":"10.59962/9780774817349-011","title":"Contextualizing Criminal Defences: Exploring the Contribution of Justice Bertha Wilson","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07025515391255831,"score_gpt":0.24975401010808987,"score_spread":0.17949885619553158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272155419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03186253,0.0007469922,0.00019081903,0.00006744479,0.0008954222,0.0006779188,0.00024010966,0.000070486065,0.9652483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5455729,0.0013291771,0.00018116775,0.00003224421,0.00023196594,0.0000014903744,0.000012573602,0.000020179414,0.45261833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838513,0.00010108511,0.00026864867,0.0003235812,0.0006283318,0.00029320532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980661,0.00042306122,0.000469097,0.00026994414,0.00065049366,0.000121261655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005754456,0.000121724755,0.00041154746,0.000030136967,0.0009621947,0.00013904899,0.0007447567,0.00030114682,0.00021498205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016271579,0.00022349418,0.00022697244,0.000012522468,0.0020176335,0.0002359993,0.00019489843,0.00047107463,0.000003246311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035723858,0.00011388588,0.00019576617,0.0012724006,0.00046084463,0.00052637677,0.057368807,0.0000063010657,0.000571322,0.74556285,0.020240856,0.17332332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003657498,0.00009322386,0.00024822121,0.0018395669,0.0012092051,0.000013565418,0.010090064,0.000004385258,0.000039553983,0.0027897726,0.98296136,0.00034535458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5639204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79770076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96272045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081489634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002448004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9113828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272184850","doi":"","title":"Developments in Criminal Procedure: The 1993-1994 Term","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Law; Criminal procedure; Interpretation (philosophy); Criminal justice; Computer science","score_opus":0.03200722309273895,"score_gpt":0.30797954426807106,"score_spread":0.2759723211753321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272184850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821219,0.0020389762,0.000085372834,0.0040598833,0.00022725607,0.00016314133,2.7413736e-7,0.000023902428,0.011279308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894613,0.0063929963,0.00004333137,0.00025616467,0.00033749317,0.000008416265,4.6055914e-7,0.000009007276,0.0034908263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693644,0.0001511968,0.00024356846,0.0001585305,0.0005160082,0.001994284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960476,0.00007202304,0.00009704412,0.00009114753,0.000044908615,0.00009013197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022940682,0.00010949168,0.00011942711,0.000071032475,0.0013174341,0.00005695603,0.000536248,0.00006288629,0.000031907693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000172918,0.00007856217,0.00006391926,0.00028980162,0.00024881004,0.00030064245,0.000033888085,0.0012606775,0.000045467656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021153709,0.000260645,0.1846927,0.00002211698,0.000086810716,0.0001630834,0.08106909,0.000014474891,0.00022640913,0.67917895,0.0020620837,0.05201208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022370773,0.00068428233,0.3695597,0.00032769487,0.00014805849,0.006468049,0.14719982,0.000016073363,0.00025987593,0.23068297,0.2410341,0.0013822835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015425129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03301934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.448496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010802236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062083146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272898030","doi":"","title":"The Possession Paradigm: The Special Part and the Police Model of the Criminal Process","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Mens rea; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Strict liability; Voluntariness; Political science; Psychology; Liability","score_opus":0.021813775778286568,"score_gpt":0.3125966711749324,"score_spread":0.2907828953966458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272898030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85091144,0.0042139753,0.0006047085,0.13395694,0.0005533473,0.0004649498,0.000002012633,0.000013681198,0.009278923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903717,0.0068453997,0.000003594829,0.0002682451,0.0016793705,0.0000072352414,7.322822e-8,0.00000718554,0.000817179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752855,0.0003102192,0.00024895603,0.00012205947,0.0006349079,0.0011552867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991305,0.0002801895,0.00023384904,0.00020152966,0.00009732155,0.00005663889],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038312392,0.0001087933,0.00012296902,0.000013120541,0.003747517,0.00018778205,0.0009526201,0.000052095347,0.0000065456156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002100291,0.00003950169,0.00012250921,0.00019090554,0.0014178965,0.00020878065,0.00006253788,0.0011306903,0.00000261331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016511418,0.000019140036,0.000089746696,0.0000036234078,0.000021741947,1.798484e-7,0.020738943,0.0005750296,0.000015967054,0.97472143,0.00014883015,0.0035002702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005494599,0.00006476605,0.00026667953,0.000054369528,0.0001143861,0.000101735815,0.057105776,0.00014034181,0.00008199198,0.9359559,0.0054746834,0.000089903464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026812355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035871543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13946025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026395632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029789659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273105983","doi":"","title":"Using Protection of Privacy Legislation to Erode Privacy: R. v. Chehil","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Warrant; Enforcement; Personally identifiable information; Law; Expectation of privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Business; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Law enforcement; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06529860378899911,"score_gpt":0.33736560571801083,"score_spread":0.27206700192901173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273105983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801838,0.000032076703,0.0025217908,0.0032111825,0.0006886898,0.0006137788,0.0000034980085,0.000093027345,0.012652162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99136287,0.0000059351773,0.0067695617,0.00016736817,0.0006446693,0.000022452732,0.0000015107106,0.000014139127,0.0010115185],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985494,0.00011293718,0.00026631675,0.00028016794,0.0004746287,0.00031657494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999035,0.00005066199,0.00014101501,0.0003517369,0.00019713148,0.0002244298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090688205,0.00011478265,0.00016677294,0.000060134214,0.00052082195,0.00011335262,0.0003544235,0.00014266037,0.00032257542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009595643,0.0001184155,0.00007159224,0.0003479234,0.0001826435,0.00069007993,0.000091353,0.00030037135,0.00013084534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001519447,0.00017987825,0.008473717,0.00009112683,0.000026003645,0.00000523104,0.013873332,0.00023137502,0.62291986,0.33968204,0.0013815458,0.012983982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044170447,0.00015773573,0.015440001,0.00020238601,0.000059517606,0.000006666975,0.0007665034,0.0003685984,0.0468,0.010961294,0.9242554,0.00054021616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032377176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016936315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92287385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090697504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019955602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9740663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273359719","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights as an Effective Manner and Form Device: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in \"Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General)\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012501353211383789,"score_gpt":0.2754712596877646,"score_spread":0.2629699064763808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273359719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99377936,0.00017847192,0.00002939652,0.0025541384,0.00010994111,0.00025818826,0.00012526805,0.0000019452932,0.0029632663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.00002015456,0.00013281558,0.000093504445,0.00005173451,0.000010459213,0.000012669408,0.0000022838215,0.00013449979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.00014553554,0.00030046512,0.0001621218,0.0005103724,0.00020410011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984938,0.0004914376,0.00016499862,0.00017558064,0.0005026826,0.00017150438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001026345,0.00007362682,0.00018465967,0.00013788993,0.0006774175,0.000019329917,0.00028108133,0.00007091199,0.000026583079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006695476,0.00005298693,0.000044775166,0.00063198846,0.00037711672,0.00020394444,0.00001493291,0.00008931771,1.1177083e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029009616,0.000038228176,0.073169425,0.000015690943,0.00009209195,0.0000052497026,0.002577966,0.014505632,0.00006306814,0.9073275,0.00042456904,0.0017515685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038734335,0.000038136397,0.91006047,0.00018303406,0.00032710982,0.000011352939,0.002485555,0.0231154,0.0007886273,0.02354696,0.03879849,0.00025754486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99978334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88378054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002012112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073508327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273430324","doi":"10.14288/1.0093677","title":"The administration of justice in the three higher criminal courts of Vancouver","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Administration of justice; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04310937119689483,"score_gpt":0.242744570441843,"score_spread":0.19963519924494816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273430324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745201,0.00009186019,0.00005801546,0.00020419098,0.00022119882,0.00013650702,0.000013312144,0.0000060085476,0.02474882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992608,0.00010318461,0.000109983564,0.000017961987,0.000024778848,2.7319373e-7,5.4018676e-7,0.0000021801507,0.00048031972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920654,0.00010725643,0.00011224989,0.000112352835,0.00032436644,0.00013723089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993178,0.00017470674,0.00014943977,0.00015526346,0.00017096185,0.000031782085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063730695,0.000020928865,0.00010901484,0.000012262562,0.00032274768,0.000022577045,0.00046079906,0.000054611966,0.00012423903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006335448,0.000044456767,0.000058890182,0.00015240686,0.0007984051,0.00022404424,0.000035615438,0.00007357238,0.0000020308064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076675846,0.0014871794,0.06400139,0.0008288662,0.00010411624,0.0005123422,0.098238975,0.0000063642397,0.0002966986,0.010409099,0.07170682,0.7516414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015012527,0.00009305058,0.9564385,0.00007102969,0.00008848664,0.0000023635823,0.03925094,0.0000051961497,0.0000017400431,0.0021416957,0.0017065027,0.000050378152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37034276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9600139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8924371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024174504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013965378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63385016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274591495","doi":"","title":"R. v. O'Brien: Can the End Justify the Means?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04716949040171145,"score_gpt":0.29563438709719725,"score_spread":0.2484648966954858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274591495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33948138,0.014602963,0.0018656453,0.3380751,0.0026390383,0.0007100254,0.0000048241022,0.00014545735,0.30247557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915726,0.0035597438,0.000015096121,0.0004994242,0.0007240663,0.0000045881575,1.7178367e-7,0.00000863085,0.0060310317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971425,0.00031038543,0.00016396193,0.0001211446,0.00044907062,0.0018129426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939346,0.0001377626,0.00010855884,0.00018947147,0.00008242344,0.0000883103],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004501321,0.00009398355,0.000086959204,0.000021709413,0.0020999375,0.000111295754,0.00086880365,0.00005214792,0.00034470716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020307946,0.00004875809,0.00010606822,0.00018904405,0.000529232,0.00016470265,0.000037650905,0.0014157647,0.000060583447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018100693,0.000014578351,0.00036584906,8.3884606e-7,0.00003188713,0.0000033175475,0.020874472,0.0000011407819,0.000013440682,0.95401734,0.0010988398,0.0235602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015551489,0.00017587526,0.0021287764,0.000016998389,0.00012265108,0.00024870207,0.1021783,0.000008009591,0.000068444235,0.45113486,0.44357395,0.00018789785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013408036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17117603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64967585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004341781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023771636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276111950","doi":"","title":"Hired Guns and Smoking Guns: McCabe v British American Tobacco Australia Ltd","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Supreme court; Adversarial system; Political science; Law; Tobacco industry; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.034751498818561835,"score_gpt":0.3078857873069314,"score_spread":0.27313428848836957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276111950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98227465,0.004755165,0.00014764533,0.006782755,0.0002623885,0.00010412614,0.0000022922798,0.000054383425,0.00561659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706051,0.01782318,0.00006638865,0.00017243916,0.00062279275,0.0000028513866,5.386715e-7,0.000013691419,0.010693014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966174,0.00016674484,0.000248381,0.000244453,0.00044654633,0.0022764937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936354,0.000070917515,0.00016636452,0.00011175137,0.00007448485,0.00021291232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014837204,0.00012755107,0.00020556188,0.000056527897,0.0009849179,0.00039703693,0.000337228,0.00006872725,0.00042701373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839778,0.00014488121,0.00009327238,0.0002874583,0.00041162292,0.0004585744,0.00003469877,0.001063064,0.00003594833],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039281942,0.0001586424,0.07132805,0.000011677119,0.000202887,0.00012670127,0.0074306866,0.000008989251,0.00023442341,0.20752259,0.013391537,0.69954455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017944704,0.001545742,0.042509966,0.0004425784,0.00039880475,0.0034292082,0.0843299,0.000068869966,0.00006131517,0.2122761,0.65128714,0.0018558821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025337087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10146618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69768864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070549897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034702037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98115325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227614572","doi":"","title":"Canada's New Consumer Product Legislation: A Shield or a Sword?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Consumer protection; Product (mathematics); Law; Business; Legislation; Commission; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Liability; Commerce; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09851926336921897,"score_gpt":0.3031498479018137,"score_spread":0.20463058453259475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227614572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44757673,0.013584208,0.0030893025,0.08078692,0.011439188,0.0012489333,0.000035064135,0.00028940372,0.44195023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97914505,0.0009258585,0.0009581768,0.0014419174,0.0013556146,0.000002635147,6.087503e-7,0.000012610908,0.01615755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983007,0.00014200437,0.0002701395,0.00018255929,0.00068760826,0.00041703368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887645,0.00013562567,0.00015480703,0.00016547715,0.00025389358,0.00041371715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008194214,0.00011904928,0.0001574655,0.000047419624,0.0007750809,0.00015513462,0.0003010427,0.000053842363,0.0031503115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047756487,0.000095055904,0.000060719634,0.00022657386,0.00015031865,0.0003363145,0.000013186741,0.0002997936,0.00005505609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004447465,0.000053737745,0.0051227068,0.000010304457,0.00006212583,0.0008999489,0.046098784,0.0000023375214,0.00003429297,0.012483585,0.9099509,0.024836514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019668954,0.000043685097,0.0015032032,0.000052861717,0.000046006033,0.00038505136,0.0025716138,0.00000201534,0.000037866866,0.0018817007,0.9931022,0.00017709343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75239927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9525084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5315683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016161348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075078835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277189023","doi":"","title":"Dans l'affaire Charkaoui c. Canada, la Cour suprême du Canada invalide une procédure permettant à l'exécutif de détenir indéfiniment et sans procés des suspects de terrorisme","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit penal et de criminologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05384868106455565,"score_gpt":0.3273620263150581,"score_spread":0.27351334525050247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277189023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90017843,0.0023752658,0.00083150255,0.08084929,0.00064652227,0.0007338983,0.00016044488,0.00013531657,0.014089347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853662,0.0018761973,0.0022988752,0.004459632,0.000717823,0.00009080749,0.000039285318,0.00008924322,0.0050618825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251145,0.0011583442,0.00093132467,0.0010013176,0.0010583786,0.0033391772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956719,0.0016815984,0.00044204888,0.0005660019,0.00034841208,0.0012900035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049040765,0.0007278189,0.0008382906,0.00014416133,0.0009867961,0.0002628658,0.0014627986,0.0007303965,0.00017079318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028164107,0.00082655024,0.00024580414,0.0007040927,0.0012466032,0.00048021015,0.00026989388,0.0015679669,0.000014790644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008793943,0.0012841704,0.19752227,0.0043593557,0.0006333859,0.057493545,0.15155782,0.002722937,0.016156584,0.46826977,0.07880462,0.02031616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016861155,0.0010982957,0.42054808,0.0033309918,0.0015701945,0.00997623,0.14989929,0.0013091947,0.02055983,0.02543684,0.36111557,0.003469371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99349093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44283292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018420523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04352281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277522755","doi":"","title":"More Criminalisation in Canada: More of the Same?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.044999098703249266,"score_gpt":0.318343759731686,"score_spread":0.27334466102843674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277522755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92443085,0.000039106155,0.0000053389545,0.056687847,0.00007221599,0.00006709932,0.0000011023187,0.000004203179,0.018692229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753875,0.000008806123,0.00008892796,0.0008971197,0.00005702179,0.000001849433,2.1809821e-7,0.0000013794345,0.0014059405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941987,0.000038226714,0.0001009547,0.000060449485,0.00027006026,0.00011041688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997691,0.000055740755,0.00003080667,0.00008455059,0.000033240394,0.000026552685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000181554,0.000029636922,0.000051202904,0.000010617277,0.000079841775,0.000006151655,0.00016287316,0.000017152553,0.00024904715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011324522,0.000020319423,0.000017690778,0.00012222762,0.00009623204,0.000093379065,0.000017005694,0.000040699146,0.000002117434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003556212,0.00009275993,0.37891355,0.00006131607,0.000009665804,0.0000069011635,0.16430414,0.0012844752,0.00050699286,0.297466,0.06585756,0.091461055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013971943,0.0000087660055,0.72004783,0.000066338784,0.000018577624,0.0000010089556,0.1508479,0.0004837516,0.0033935106,0.0007979319,0.12403692,0.00015776361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99597937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99956197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34113425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002929889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008036592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2726892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278476361","doi":"","title":"Criminal Appeals as Jury Control: An Anglo-Canadian Historical Perspective on the Rise of Criminal Appeals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jury; Criminal justice; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal law; Context (archaeology); Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.025775780889411196,"score_gpt":0.31611340107566815,"score_spread":0.290337620186257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278476361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.840374,0.0075075515,0.001032653,0.11014649,0.0007395182,0.00063890475,0.000013791982,0.000066154906,0.03948096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959264,0.001211614,0.000032911874,0.00071207463,0.0009304758,0.00000932636,6.4425836e-7,0.000023950735,0.0011526486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503267,0.000592372,0.00042101755,0.00035419592,0.00092538196,0.002674393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982054,0.00020751427,0.00028292558,0.00028935663,0.0004299123,0.00058488443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00462821,0.00024398507,0.00035637178,0.00022062418,0.0015090347,0.00012427084,0.0008848804,0.00016097102,0.0001631353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007777502,0.00018832677,0.00026901052,0.0003186814,0.00033828814,0.0004013883,0.000019616797,0.0018228318,0.00009291022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028362052,0.00016020933,0.00013650105,0.000005452594,0.00006738415,0.00003679155,0.011767886,0.000051626575,0.0001286524,0.9832086,0.0004296334,0.0037236493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013890497,0.0036306637,0.0011589243,0.00013713843,0.0005012634,0.00046530942,0.20037512,0.000010532902,0.00013862716,0.75448895,0.03714325,0.000561181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35515368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51184887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22871965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02025713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011695863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278549597","doi":"","title":"Property on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context ed. Eric Tucker, James Muir, Bruce Ziff (review)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.039407165941338015,"score_gpt":0.29291311381129825,"score_spread":0.2535059478699602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278549597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4225358,0.24263525,0.000009492809,0.20333019,0.010275009,0.002098326,0.00041424634,0.000024873383,0.11867678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9009115,0.043235485,0.00009700673,0.042450354,0.0014526368,0.00002375632,0.000012174162,0.00006696735,0.011750118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949981,0.0008848674,0.0012158359,0.00059148704,0.00030679116,0.0020029412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922444,0.0009211039,0.0006359347,0.0004048628,0.00056102884,0.00523263],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043789838,0.0005365394,0.0013332977,0.00018137485,0.0011989847,0.00023942877,0.0007717602,0.0005566832,0.0007568788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016827909,0.0005135484,0.0007401006,0.0006104135,0.0017914122,0.00071929756,0.000025598014,0.001321209,0.00003289707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022452361,0.0000923438,0.0002908671,0.0014793422,0.00023579401,0.0015612877,0.054769095,0.000028032407,0.000002599241,0.63998085,0.23320581,0.06812945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036318335,0.00093884993,0.00026230322,0.0058815787,0.00026435198,0.0005051138,0.023814756,0.000060277147,0.0000019544477,0.0024738617,0.961465,0.00070011796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97702754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7282592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035801786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076809986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279900049","doi":"","title":"Développements récents relatifs au droit à la protection contre les fouilles, les perquisitions ou les saisies abusives dans les écoles et autres lieux publics (Recent Developments Regarding the Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures in Schools and Other Public Places)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Political science; Art; Ethnology; History","score_opus":0.07416733354734356,"score_gpt":0.30238135371022873,"score_spread":0.22821402016288517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279900049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9200093,0.021664968,0.0023841388,0.05284878,0.00017405482,0.00111824,0.000016956683,0.00005967272,0.0017238489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993554,0.094048075,0.00019853213,0.00007064984,0.00022114905,0.00013613743,0.000006453882,0.00004449328,0.005919082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412763,0.0017203586,0.00063207606,0.00056415604,0.00082656386,0.002129204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984895,0.0002920904,0.0004608644,0.00016756197,0.00035175768,0.00023821824],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046969703,0.00043468134,0.00038361317,0.0003360399,0.0056142947,0.0008109963,0.00041529688,0.00039566436,0.000032459815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010324673,0.00036691508,0.000107999644,0.0007081349,0.0010658959,0.0015779994,0.00017535248,0.0028546632,0.0000052823134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036701412,0.0004811281,0.3621011,0.00021106658,0.0006485682,0.000036293917,0.043806206,0.00040263098,0.00051657256,0.18250708,0.00044347032,0.40847886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035870287,0.0006578369,0.2590557,0.0033741882,0.00021408992,0.0020278734,0.446622,0.00090121536,0.00026340186,0.057216175,0.22457637,0.0015040832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020366019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23530987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40697476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036339446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041983705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280062980","doi":"10.7202/1027799ar","title":"Notions juridiques applicables aux procédures de règlement amiable des litiges au Canada. Joëlle Thibault, Les procédures de règlement amiable des litiges au Canada, Collection bleue, Montréal, Wilson et Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 428 pages, ISBN 2-89127-490-3","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02743201783232916,"score_gpt":0.2709401230011389,"score_spread":0.24350810516880975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280062980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8582004,0.04089311,0.0017830974,0.044981692,0.00082934654,0.0026833536,0.0007286441,0.0003627176,0.049537655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8600542,0.043984663,0.0041831476,0.0010553942,0.0018009002,0.0011766824,0.00014304153,0.00014624425,0.087455705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919202,0.000866612,0.0012191859,0.0012564523,0.0012488577,0.0034887004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610263,0.00073399144,0.0005716608,0.0006941916,0.00072171015,0.0011757916],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021481714,0.0008058002,0.0009868423,0.00022717824,0.0049803164,0.0005708584,0.0010027412,0.0005353659,0.0005910146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008182479,0.001060607,0.00027723343,0.0014469306,0.0011042857,0.0010300133,0.00023287481,0.00083356,0.000021886735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046392463,0.0019112749,0.19324559,0.0067028394,0.00074825407,0.0009950933,0.033706747,0.026465792,0.0026656594,0.077244096,0.6361465,0.019704226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076133845,0.0005093031,0.048979722,0.003523965,0.000613075,0.0002834739,0.019853525,0.0014699342,0.005414551,0.016541155,0.9003675,0.0016824839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99896914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26422098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022670766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03782867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280485996","doi":"","title":"Le rôle des valeurs et du contexte dans la transformation de la fonction de juger","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007647450277384231,"score_gpt":0.20923222242810158,"score_spread":0.20158477215071735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280485996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7944416,0.0019939842,0.007076728,0.004635984,0.0007506613,0.00014244528,0.000021465512,0.00008065389,0.19085649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878869,0.00082368526,0.0008129164,0.00012464957,0.00022153958,0.000009878311,0.00001177276,0.000013126927,0.010095509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998054,0.0006612378,0.00021225479,0.0002665328,0.00038423852,0.00042173106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988694,0.00036998853,0.00012946229,0.00016214311,0.00014604593,0.00032294373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012113727,0.0001904909,0.0001685331,0.000082295075,0.0074531706,0.00012658202,0.00029336818,0.00036355335,0.00004650668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014022326,0.00023503583,0.00019664514,0.00023935917,0.0022243725,0.0014313912,0.000055613426,0.00045853027,0.00003698451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013641643,0.00019989935,0.016007531,0.000057921374,0.000053975895,0.000427406,0.13911472,0.001068757,0.030498037,0.8032243,0.0005079031,0.008703129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010533443,0.00011519324,0.077391915,0.00019610417,0.0002972181,0.002511781,0.11942498,0.0020212617,0.006980844,0.008253172,0.7812809,0.00047330375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17327991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07967999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7949711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022829385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026356406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99383897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280581562","doi":"","title":"Good Faith, Bad Faith and the Gulf between: A Proposal for Consistent Terminology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Faith; Terminology; Phrase; Confusion; Bad faith; Jurisprudence; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.048996816244247884,"score_gpt":0.29784516596780924,"score_spread":0.24884834972356135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280581562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64980024,0.0022958978,0.0011796243,0.051901847,0.0016278566,0.004584638,0.00011683815,0.0004063593,0.28808668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935014,0.00005558736,0.002395973,0.0007217185,0.00044703766,0.00012662915,0.0000031963261,0.000013644726,0.0027347833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839586,0.0002654996,0.0002660948,0.00033867874,0.00024901365,0.00048485902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988239,0.00046003563,0.00011480859,0.00027472278,0.000111459856,0.00021507814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010457666,0.00015348996,0.00029562606,0.000025194142,0.00090683805,0.00012759442,0.0004079839,0.00014294856,0.00019625011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034640275,0.00010467185,0.00011436349,0.000089313835,0.0018130217,0.00026976634,0.00010625042,0.0001930053,0.000087976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013942941,0.000031681004,0.009613682,0.00002523495,0.00003782203,0.00000718674,0.004963897,7.514217e-8,0.000023562934,0.9804412,0.0016604271,0.0030558165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034961947,0.000635378,0.021537554,0.00013224715,0.00041935092,0.000031400024,0.010865573,0.000012448729,0.00084476656,0.23169594,0.72963244,0.00069669425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009766562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018401109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74874526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004192398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024818294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281632046","doi":"10.5623/cig2013-006","title":"<i>Black v. Norris</i>: A New Synopsis of Survey Law","year":2013,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0638483562228107,"score_gpt":0.30286507742339536,"score_spread":0.23901672120058465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281632046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71870786,0.00084950536,0.00023822668,0.015336047,0.0008562126,0.0010263639,0.00006944722,0.0000828749,0.26283348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97680146,0.00018864476,0.0006117911,0.0005309554,0.00023521416,0.00000772903,0.000006676672,0.000017565315,0.021599986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724996,0.00048475512,0.0006202945,0.00032653954,0.0006871017,0.00063133857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743843,0.0010752981,0.00026648125,0.0004997371,0.0002898148,0.00043023605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011455792,0.00022092876,0.0004932612,0.000040130748,0.00029253933,0.00019293097,0.00063894986,0.00019514396,0.010616819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077987503,0.00020334795,0.00016390039,0.00049756904,0.0009262624,0.00042895682,0.00014735418,0.00015862976,0.008981433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041770032,0.0003328326,0.012736707,0.0006703247,0.00014969353,0.000008229977,0.038686465,0.000020063715,0.000686977,0.08472245,0.8528199,0.00912454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014017643,0.0009517164,0.4298574,0.0023800088,0.00078669365,0.0000104097535,0.026570983,0.0013191577,0.0016871707,0.07248135,0.4602109,0.0023424758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42967486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03757461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4171207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048134305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031448662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281825073","doi":"","title":"Summary Judgment Has its Day in Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summary judgment; Appeal; Mandate; Law; Credibility; Political science; Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Supreme court; Psychology","score_opus":0.05574907517458608,"score_gpt":0.3138775116869349,"score_spread":0.25812843651234885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281825073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5238985,0.008089936,0.00003805145,0.027672477,0.0028960381,0.0007005858,0.000018371857,0.00022254362,0.4364635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896288,0.00018362899,0.00016047551,0.0012543427,0.0008324197,0.000028824914,0.0000042218944,0.0000123312775,0.007894969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998108,0.00024106244,0.00023374855,0.0002189984,0.0005069695,0.0006912004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990814,0.00017182018,0.00005858018,0.00022312909,0.000051135972,0.00041396276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769133,0.00012828852,0.00017915142,0.000041206502,0.00048923295,0.00014978214,0.0003470988,0.00011564285,0.0012948434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002692631,0.00012668068,0.00006716945,0.00022057425,0.00022523274,0.0009238366,0.00008431316,0.0002440625,0.0015866722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005933181,0.00047053248,0.08512113,0.00006681398,0.000025079107,0.00004878683,0.014035841,0.000020899855,0.0015088948,0.73269546,0.16250142,0.0034457915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001738054,0.000021348742,0.01227766,0.00008558996,0.000012785041,0.0000010428299,0.0012860415,0.0000044809776,0.0005023883,0.000807343,0.98462677,0.00020073872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152758015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029072315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8221254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002197235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014524661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281954044","doi":"10.11575/prism/33978","title":"Whatever Happened To ... Feeney?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0427106296052758,"score_gpt":0.24499373465293375,"score_spread":0.20228310504765795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281954044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4412288,0.000072024355,0.041448656,0.0036563177,0.00018896922,0.00021577557,2.0595074e-7,0.00007879177,0.51311046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438229,0.00009107885,0.03377919,0.00021827914,0.000017534278,1.7323461e-7,8.224502e-7,0.000005379121,0.022064626],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933875,0.000053838005,0.000052805968,0.00014581688,0.00021798616,0.00019081098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995606,0.000026153017,0.00004022433,0.0001347327,0.00005950668,0.00017878452],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022854393,0.000053125503,0.00010644421,0.000059660128,0.0002977002,0.000008396129,0.0003654419,0.000062110346,0.0014989431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003530513,0.000066547516,0.000060311588,0.00013834269,0.00018885694,0.00032645706,0.000098313714,0.00005470081,0.00033771116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044246146,0.00024791728,0.014049256,0.000047399553,0.00006243073,0.00017395269,0.25187063,2.1076727e-7,0.0008982257,0.18221983,0.04073396,0.50925374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035716745,0.00015131518,0.11751619,0.000067346875,0.00007356959,0.0000010184142,0.007266354,0.00007469309,0.00059966237,0.004933121,0.86862123,0.00033836352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030801335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013791024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82788724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003929027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075371434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284973347","doi":"","title":"Exclusion of Evidence Obtained in Violation of Fundamental Rights in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.03354760912979791,"score_gpt":0.31418138694565834,"score_spread":0.2806337778158604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284973347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99620503,0.0022164637,0.000019634486,0.0012511176,0.00007656038,0.00006750315,3.502021e-7,0.0000011124454,0.00016224597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780214,0.0015965651,0.000021446864,0.000009639543,0.0000885558,3.3437252e-7,2.8265092e-7,0.0000018234581,0.0004792383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858457,0.00012632001,0.00022873371,0.000062690684,0.00028533046,0.0007123726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995987,0.00012692517,0.0001272523,0.00003848679,0.000028626368,0.00008004905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001904055,0.000050561477,0.00011846491,0.000067796114,0.00008550526,0.000007694004,0.0000978517,0.0000352557,0.000020044305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011482265,0.00004012616,0.000016434386,0.00014053272,0.00004862154,0.0004058249,0.00001821081,0.00029681885,2.3093041e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011385426,0.000036112455,0.9554745,0.000009237189,0.0000061984256,0.000001389304,0.0048538703,0.000010547451,0.0011089287,0.033957794,0.00010516633,0.0043224236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013361792,0.00041621033,0.8562484,0.0008940419,0.000038406673,0.00006848783,0.019912606,0.000055002143,0.0007393611,0.1106577,0.009330903,0.00030274797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94969636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99606127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099226125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096947764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037657192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66802245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285113285","doi":"","title":"Les poursuites-bâillons : frontière entre liberté d’expression et droit à la réputation","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Publics; Ethnology; Art; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.008528379982824803,"score_gpt":0.21800276467907126,"score_spread":0.20947438469624646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285113285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.691929,0.011893403,0.0007575152,0.01740497,0.0029432483,0.00030453733,0.00006812227,0.00017132673,0.27452788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8656916,0.0006413318,0.0015870667,0.00016262583,0.00038081218,0.000008145986,0.000033160275,0.000019562274,0.1314757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974824,0.0003911651,0.0002908179,0.00053330616,0.0007749204,0.0005273575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831873,0.0004410269,0.00025411346,0.00029941185,0.00022632605,0.00046040147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005161038,0.0003006193,0.00026556363,0.00013719752,0.0076174713,0.00015504728,0.00048716777,0.00052537245,0.0004762224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018980562,0.0003508404,0.00027673162,0.00032525064,0.0010936003,0.0011226992,0.00022732362,0.0007119313,0.00017280118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034988145,0.00052105595,0.025244232,0.000106161075,0.00012765844,0.0019747398,0.12246618,0.0010466055,0.046883605,0.7424504,0.010986395,0.04784309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065201515,0.00007602195,0.032172382,0.00035156737,0.0002568935,0.00054298906,0.029689485,0.0006825278,0.0036423756,0.004207722,0.92718244,0.0005435954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13943955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059233204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91619605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021168855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013122333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285289919","doi":"","title":"La divulgation préalable au procès des éléments de preuve et des moyens de défense de l'accusé en droit pénal canadien (P.G.Amyot).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0346658857466383,"score_gpt":0.30373960561168434,"score_spread":0.269073719865046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285289919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9566698,0.0011931952,0.0023996467,0.0033242658,0.00023801252,0.00053212116,0.000055324796,0.000108596534,0.035479058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637637,0.0034448076,0.004249981,0.00045315127,0.000791132,0.00011746663,0.000020280757,0.000059106384,0.027100336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953143,0.001099847,0.00049350696,0.00059429073,0.00043123958,0.0020668441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975578,0.00069250807,0.00024662793,0.0003643497,0.00021630299,0.00092238135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034540396,0.00030796297,0.00041649415,0.00012041814,0.0010064051,0.00029663034,0.0006619375,0.0005269075,0.00026779037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014931858,0.00046856137,0.00021369118,0.0006636919,0.00091275154,0.0010101655,0.00013343626,0.00059924484,0.00015321579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002080921,0.0005622312,0.6690501,0.0012066943,0.00016427191,0.0014469199,0.21455243,0.0022477568,0.00200959,0.06433647,0.0020578885,0.04215756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012929721,0.0006943027,0.41289327,0.004016291,0.00091637846,0.0033388687,0.015135663,0.005974036,0.0027066881,0.47571316,0.075535856,0.0017825085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20114966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38133925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41137668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012752987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022107053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285940806","doi":"","title":"'Equality and Supreme Court Jurisprudence: Never the Twain Shall Meet' - Chapter in The Supreme Court of Canada and the Achievement of Social Justice: Commitment, Retrenchment or Retreat","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Constitution","score_opus":0.022800795458022972,"score_gpt":0.311787899144377,"score_spread":0.288987103686354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285940806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90991133,0.0009230983,0.000021573456,0.085511565,0.00022967643,0.0004532658,0.000012842192,0.000003885333,0.00293274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962962,0.0022009965,0.000013020618,0.00052768417,0.00022040078,0.000009154233,7.4719253e-7,0.0000063100592,0.0007254439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671334,0.0006496362,0.00046369666,0.000181716,0.0009800207,0.0010116143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985822,0.0006762389,0.00032794385,0.00021384153,0.00012966384,0.00007010374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011599123,0.00015665327,0.00027538804,0.00003112019,0.0010248128,0.00007529465,0.0006529177,0.000082454884,0.00007466007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025981973,0.000075257434,0.00006902218,0.00015190286,0.0009985456,0.0001834248,0.00008993803,0.0012151396,2.3689131e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004913046,0.00009106639,0.008412077,0.00003053169,0.00010594884,0.000004678782,0.025818788,0.0000017017596,0.00018258876,0.9613925,0.0020551041,0.00141369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007743946,0.001533618,0.20283431,0.00025722795,0.0016530687,0.00032895638,0.3622494,0.00023453121,0.000319668,0.26239473,0.15941288,0.0010376656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.272593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9643311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6989978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033090217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7882135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286221447","doi":"10.7202/1034457ar","title":"Le silence des textes constitutionnels canadiens - expression d’une constitution encore inachevée","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Auteur theory; Art; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.03802661926262237,"score_gpt":0.2759903942513464,"score_spread":0.23796377498872404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286221447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74462116,0.009815888,0.022376489,0.0065386733,0.0017006604,0.00032773515,0.000069202746,0.00010735915,0.21444285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97698426,0.00050167984,0.001894922,0.00037788486,0.0004354664,0.00002191215,0.000012275201,0.000011307941,0.01976031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730545,0.00037658677,0.00039502184,0.0004870242,0.0005776571,0.000858237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978742,0.000387605,0.00020205152,0.00031391098,0.0003594074,0.0008628472],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001394719,0.00025380895,0.00032799935,0.000099553174,0.0017004291,0.00017598957,0.00050796656,0.0005106025,0.00012972044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021869,0.00028706994,0.00013416633,0.00068434677,0.013380825,0.0009961394,0.000066719476,0.00051769015,0.00017268171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003508724,0.0000829613,0.0027784584,0.00006789969,0.000015901076,0.00016810853,0.055424303,0.00068435975,0.0008525387,0.91905636,0.006920153,0.013913898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066114066,0.00020477395,0.0012006073,0.0011383853,0.00015749846,0.00025470587,0.15254588,0.00039761694,0.0037776248,0.3674124,0.4714837,0.00076568377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16030458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06578555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55164397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023431818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002759934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286322069","doi":"","title":"The Principled Exception and the Forgotten Criterion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Witness; Judgement; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Law; Federal Rules of Evidence; Original meaning; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011957897237715997,"score_gpt":0.314395254354852,"score_spread":0.302437357117136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286322069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9113114,0.008301886,0.010442954,0.057322532,0.00050515175,0.0002930197,1.8440116e-7,0.000032345317,0.011790567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98304653,0.013030235,0.000010988788,0.0001426542,0.00059492275,0.0000020070017,1.17539955e-7,0.0000043805085,0.003168145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980461,0.00018374808,0.0001591138,0.00007807821,0.00029124497,0.0012416866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936485,0.0003453019,0.00008779906,0.00007861772,0.000066921755,0.00005649788],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013087034,0.00005612323,0.000064659616,0.000018763281,0.0023133918,0.0001889186,0.00023676496,0.000038266342,0.00001027013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030991572,0.000028657125,0.00005431212,0.000092239316,0.00040468722,0.00018453678,0.000026833311,0.0006581286,0.0000089707255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017080213,0.000004820348,0.0006556572,0.0000010432893,0.00001307749,8.694481e-7,0.0030458043,2.596666e-7,0.00005859422,0.9138508,0.00008331261,0.082115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006747179,0.0001080201,0.006974821,0.000017264574,0.000038752634,0.00014978046,0.030609947,0.000016605441,0.000015676927,0.7656149,0.1956768,0.000102679405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072142575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03697161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19559349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050019345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286525259","doi":"","title":"Independent Legal Representation for Victims of Sexual Assault: A Model for Delivery of Legal Services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sexual assault; Legislature; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Representation (politics); Criminology; Legal process; Process (computing); Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Politics; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.028421690228102214,"score_gpt":0.34086658368091305,"score_spread":0.31244489345281085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286525259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171307,0.00089788047,0.078064956,0.002657307,0.00012934205,0.00042546002,0.000020509395,0.000015757292,0.0006580867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557996,0.0004409084,0.00121158,0.000049432005,0.00043370383,0.000016429276,0.000004784157,0.0000111622885,0.0022520155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978942,0.00006184282,0.0003885731,0.00017279475,0.00051163865,0.0009709285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989141,0.00013329936,0.0003298318,0.00009968644,0.0004549442,0.00006811382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022854388,0.00009453358,0.00019794349,0.000079256155,0.00030947567,0.00005030855,0.00031595322,0.000099692916,0.0000088016495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007268582,0.000091044494,0.00012529691,0.000107040694,0.00007495498,0.00082436425,0.000021383192,0.00037046618,9.979218e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017250797,0.000381711,0.0013290351,0.00020152573,0.0003105986,0.0000010414916,0.015169112,0.020111877,0.013058768,0.86705863,0.0004602395,0.08019235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008456783,0.0053357375,0.00087850966,0.00032532457,0.0013839253,0.00023900376,0.22677784,0.34325042,0.013473899,0.3436042,0.05488493,0.0013894126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004119817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080124095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5234545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042617193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024773285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93666124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286891959","doi":"","title":"R v Khawaja and the Fraught Question of Rehabilitation in Terrorism Sentencing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Terrorism; Deterrence (psychology); Trial court; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Sociology; Psychology; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.005884176239330065,"score_gpt":0.282505382553309,"score_spread":0.2766212063139789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286891959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764168,0.0009379008,0.0025017383,0.018635558,0.000103963364,0.00009041677,7.7491954e-8,0.0000059112945,0.0013076282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998422,0.0011521677,0.000082811064,0.000036974852,0.00013543705,0.0000019023479,1.1420361e-7,0.0000026702567,0.00016592436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985273,0.00052246626,0.0001761694,0.000072400486,0.00020100096,0.000500698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993598,0.00040254433,0.00010193554,0.000053887543,0.000056381774,0.000025464986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008481188,0.000041239553,0.00009332129,0.000046273337,0.00021193062,0.000022864948,0.00010069684,0.00003609451,0.000004296396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010470448,0.000028635146,0.00003456477,0.0001067875,0.00023788333,0.00018273608,0.000010446034,0.00045870134,0.0000013919127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005906026,0.000011655351,0.012597022,0.000005633165,0.0000049546343,1.3551478e-7,0.010826958,0.000015797454,0.00008501407,0.94906473,0.00001623476,0.0273128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007282145,0.00018661135,0.013295914,0.000099124634,0.000019944013,0.000019949908,0.070471406,0.00029266393,0.000016089429,0.9120236,0.0027725794,0.00007393051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076445476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052844964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059644446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024419161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034226783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287127029","doi":"","title":"'Stacking the odds against the accused' : appraising the curial attitude towards amici participation in criminal matters","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Odds; Political science; Jurisprudence; Compromise; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13068801411180464,"score_gpt":0.37079714021066074,"score_spread":0.2401091260988561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287127029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738628,0.00044620893,0.0026658406,0.012138908,0.0016637496,0.00030695417,0.0000045087554,0.000020813677,0.008890164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961174,0.00008574095,0.00029027864,0.0020035484,0.0014264934,0.000009922464,3.3406215e-7,0.00001941124,0.000046854868],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960154,0.0011325593,0.0008068048,0.00021988068,0.0011335796,0.0006917254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735385,0.0009827999,0.000763837,0.0003327528,0.0003809783,0.00018577486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005121127,0.00022791562,0.0003053514,0.00015106976,0.001359184,0.00031366863,0.0014570449,0.00008175184,0.00009368624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001847399,0.00011957265,0.0002301379,0.0005485186,0.0011246924,0.000552711,0.00012370481,0.00080074265,0.000022976528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007522061,0.00012522437,0.0010104466,0.00011221597,0.000053917858,0.00011389755,0.96779525,0.00044482824,0.00013664392,0.012403323,0.0005233285,0.016528692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048126956,0.00025139222,0.021377526,0.0003560786,0.0026641767,0.000047190173,0.96662116,0.00019942617,0.00015377403,0.0007235123,0.0068224245,0.00030204328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011455319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072998134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022254562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016927092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050851726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287406766","doi":"10.7202/1034466ar","title":"L’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels et l’impossibilité psychologique d’agir : une réforme à deux vitesses","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05858885056913623,"score_gpt":0.3428261036675258,"score_spread":0.2842372530983896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287406766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9161098,0.005439023,0.0060730777,0.02170401,0.0010070801,0.0003680223,0.000032932992,0.0002126515,0.049053393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736474,0.0022592812,0.005261984,0.0024659159,0.00054022594,0.00004570028,0.000024322819,0.000046552665,0.015708625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964509,0.000698434,0.000552446,0.0006459589,0.0006132093,0.0010390352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718237,0.0010320133,0.00027979884,0.00043737126,0.0004193266,0.0006491037],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002708898,0.00039758405,0.00044446083,0.00013238678,0.0007543508,0.00034141587,0.0006283745,0.00088686496,0.0002684306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023531448,0.0004201769,0.00022408609,0.0008542426,0.0035024704,0.0015680093,0.000068510824,0.00081169774,0.000260749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032774988,0.00067590113,0.04407185,0.0004671619,0.00015511939,0.00015248622,0.31455392,0.00048692105,0.0016566492,0.4837183,0.0149599705,0.13877396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008450122,0.000782259,0.04309664,0.00049070746,0.00034196576,0.00014796329,0.070245765,0.00030722955,0.0022931064,0.6765966,0.20378788,0.0010649008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012962077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008771164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24430814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017537499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006550815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288463069","doi":"","title":"Developments in Constitutional Law: The 2011-2012 Term","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Charter; Plaintiff; Commission; Context (archaeology); Geography","score_opus":0.027800173496849188,"score_gpt":0.31664727246753477,"score_spread":0.28884709897068556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288463069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5036833,0.031447753,0.0021325953,0.02515695,0.0033103586,0.00054744456,0.0000035358537,0.000071999966,0.43364602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473584,0.001733127,0.000039087234,0.00028082752,0.0005650054,0.0000045483753,6.3505786e-7,0.0000033815109,0.0026375784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972869,0.00015923903,0.00016961212,0.00007488961,0.00035473864,0.001954582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996354,0.000090093745,0.00006700683,0.00006253227,0.000042557458,0.000102428115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039633457,0.00007362232,0.00007869537,0.000035963458,0.0008496889,0.000056739227,0.0003014602,0.0000524168,0.0001809056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006160876,0.00005189451,0.00004445942,0.00008790625,0.00055451255,0.0007002735,0.000028483952,0.00083908805,0.00024921878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009305974,0.00003090543,0.02583923,7.153721e-7,0.00001209681,9.233509e-7,0.0015219257,7.343083e-7,0.000016678232,0.9687834,0.00033186722,0.0034522288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040941278,0.000039372237,0.038013496,0.000040878436,0.000027726608,0.0003061377,0.0102156205,6.0406245e-7,0.000030792944,0.18409345,0.766559,0.0002635106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010270613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021601977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78468996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009186333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026347933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291008671","doi":"","title":"Taking Remedies Seriously: An Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Tribunal; Theme (computing); Political science; Subject (documents); Administration of justice; Sociology; Library science","score_opus":0.03038149575380293,"score_gpt":0.3376205380709367,"score_spread":0.3072390423171338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291008671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95385903,0.0051657897,0.0017265786,0.029925968,0.0022967583,0.00010509877,2.6050165e-7,0.0000972461,0.006823257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858806,0.0026909544,0.000103294515,0.000078289006,0.009394481,0.0000017560087,7.835774e-7,0.000009327908,0.0018404861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705726,0.00019471376,0.00014495508,0.00010727737,0.00033743292,0.0021583878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999502,0.00002545613,0.0001359014,0.00009719403,0.00008220555,0.00015721637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00453993,0.0000765594,0.00009232938,0.00005436268,0.0009284834,0.00008870069,0.00020541887,0.000055899305,0.00018825383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031691729,0.00006976,0.000049708535,0.00014358934,0.0001131685,0.0012913404,0.000016165917,0.00082752854,0.000042136304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028725624,0.000049063925,0.006557505,0.0000025498873,0.000025049565,7.888555e-7,0.009553741,0.000005187745,0.0006253011,0.9144394,0.00068300456,0.06802972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025409987,0.0003902491,0.0054190774,0.000021567088,0.000093224895,0.00052110705,0.115514174,0.00001067832,0.0002472478,0.18313089,0.69399035,0.00040734746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011146815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014626435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73130846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082122773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084856205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8161894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291316273","doi":"","title":"The Purpose, Nature and Constitutionality of the Presumptions of Section 69 of the Competition Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Constitutionality; Law; Charter; Political science; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02165344818239979,"score_gpt":0.3103482877832978,"score_spread":0.28869483960089803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291316273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813143,0.003376086,0.00019330526,0.0085431915,0.0006080299,0.00018555568,0.0000067054843,0.0000038759886,0.005768927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982361,0.0012817907,0.0000061121577,0.000017136066,0.00010675467,0.0000011646658,2.2596036e-7,0.0000014055729,0.00034927033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881005,0.00030277774,0.00016753498,0.00005193702,0.00038353942,0.0002841621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925303,0.00013093857,0.00024073153,0.00010341993,0.0002449594,0.000026908829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024621526,0.000040147108,0.00007077693,0.000011952116,0.00061684515,0.00001737108,0.00025077673,0.00006268403,0.000005300587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004075398,0.00001987154,0.0000720713,0.00014631732,0.0008687334,0.00011976496,0.000033643526,0.0006911141,2.4454044e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030826952,0.00002116183,0.01005427,0.000004922973,0.000021455427,2.1653515e-8,0.0006820194,0.00003360004,0.0004330246,0.9880253,0.00013031831,0.0005630799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005053017,0.00017494087,0.109873645,0.00017562688,0.0001457294,0.0001068049,0.017709835,0.00003110381,0.0014691103,0.8147788,0.054921925,0.00010719121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008809971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01728135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17324652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019379973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022264041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96433985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293869997","doi":"10.14288/1.0077473","title":"The reasonable person in substantive Canadian Criminal Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019115152084621542,"score_gpt":0.2168281545225562,"score_spread":0.19771300243793466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293869997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90347695,0.00028438726,0.00000341569,0.0029920104,0.0000726558,0.00012851544,0.000018390332,0.000017420381,0.09300626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737847,0.00024290002,0.000043633918,0.00013552512,0.000026896658,1.2595511e-7,0.0000017484663,0.0000026385333,0.0021680598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904567,0.00009440341,0.00005650219,0.00018871756,0.00023733161,0.00037736763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946195,0.00007043685,0.00004232456,0.00011959847,0.0001224459,0.0001832462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004659933,0.000024521683,0.00011021136,0.000022085946,0.0013206677,0.00016341977,0.0003669296,0.000071999384,0.00008120376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058523256,0.00007599875,0.000055514633,0.00027034327,0.0005582661,0.00035410805,0.000012119852,0.0001148064,0.000016452781],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004115272,0.000102969716,0.014730783,0.00002269777,0.000015168116,0.0010229644,0.026040016,0.0000038479366,0.00004344033,0.01240714,0.02053154,0.9250383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015592908,0.000041350762,0.9051855,0.00008033545,0.00001406218,0.00000645524,0.07060254,0.0000101564865,1.7936111e-7,0.0010781289,0.022728214,0.0000971271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002631806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003413222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294124469","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1430","title":"Anger and Intent for Murder: The Supreme Court Decisions in R. v. Parent","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Anger; Law; Jurisprudence; Scope (computer science); Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09311821305916881,"score_gpt":0.35331538144474406,"score_spread":0.2601971683855753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294124469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13335985,0.009510319,0.007303445,0.08437118,0.0027350173,0.0014537496,0.00002302172,0.000058312286,0.7611851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968625,0.0012873007,0.0009131588,0.00042911925,0.0001476176,0.000014022868,3.8728595e-7,0.000007166531,0.00033872816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877745,0.0002059434,0.0002302779,0.00013603964,0.00031042745,0.0003398692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900377,0.00052829407,0.00007330675,0.00010760223,0.00012188363,0.00016514052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018644389,0.000085025444,0.00012623773,0.000028498489,0.0011528366,0.00021851233,0.00021810825,0.00005571537,0.00013164285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006578032,0.000056656452,0.00007501009,0.000084303385,0.00023274556,0.00020253882,0.0000253387,0.00022140805,0.00000795947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028119564,0.00005580052,0.0026811087,0.000002726886,0.000009749689,0.000013450011,0.0033292058,0.000018218168,0.00004397232,0.98272777,0.0050763832,0.006013515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055758056,0.000100709265,0.0024441371,0.00014547474,0.000039045448,0.00010923606,0.013073668,0.000048617025,0.00006228019,0.2710715,0.712169,0.00017878048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118503515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35734877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077592194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087722015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294162132","doi":"","title":"Innocence Compensation: A Comparative Look at the American and Canadian Approaches","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Innocence; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06001516030452464,"score_gpt":0.30062165550251807,"score_spread":0.24060649519799343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294162132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445715,0.0016551547,0.00010506844,0.03994843,0.000054978133,0.00018506024,8.3192e-7,0.000010092155,0.013468892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960931,0.0010502823,0.000032931854,0.00039141736,0.00016220399,0.000008333113,6.8655993e-7,0.000003757766,0.0022572738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809986,0.00020363831,0.000116600255,0.00012186307,0.00021947111,0.0012385622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994288,0.00011389967,0.00011002708,0.00007942914,0.000081380014,0.00018645312],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001094929,0.00007788579,0.00011772687,0.000040352537,0.0015173499,0.00017348942,0.00023674581,0.000020795493,0.00011423304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042486186,0.000054486925,0.00002889908,0.00020151719,0.0007815516,0.000250397,0.00002489222,0.0005698236,0.00009799866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025162966,0.00002542675,0.032437474,0.0000030211625,0.000083988445,0.0000029236428,0.026524726,0.00002292904,0.000044752385,0.8857373,0.0044923015,0.05059998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004071589,0.00051237876,0.09936283,0.0000411681,0.00007903672,0.0005086505,0.4674946,0.0004379094,0.000044640346,0.25108933,0.17940009,0.0006222021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39470193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.934438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63464797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010532265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002305645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296093784","doi":"","title":"The Plight and Solution Concerning Hearing and Adopting Lawyer's Defense","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Law; Active listening; Order (exchange); Political science; Defense attorney; Self defense; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.05002147495412592,"score_gpt":0.3034149743780358,"score_spread":0.2533934994239099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296093784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80936015,0.0007799834,0.00012341214,0.03853127,0.000491836,0.00021336773,0.0000059741055,0.00005303007,0.15044098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883235,0.00013207675,0.00005394412,0.00021545314,0.000210822,0.0000032619837,4.2650825e-8,0.0000030152216,0.0005490361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.000055897894,0.00008172354,0.00020855395,0.00025730632,0.0005528337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992324,0.00020024389,0.000038923296,0.000057687816,0.00007933995,0.00039140924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015711836,0.00005467614,0.000058823494,0.000035935725,0.0070482832,0.0003213086,0.00020314821,0.000042525542,0.000010375064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060927635,0.000037430073,0.000013579142,0.00024097375,0.0030402374,0.00041910546,0.000051950872,0.000058956448,0.00000706929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049000664,0.0000013615331,0.03341339,0.0000041276567,0.0000026176187,0.000008181625,0.021624746,5.359237e-8,0.0021672652,0.6729871,0.00069173006,0.26909453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013759414,0.000020961963,0.03110653,0.0000804564,0.000010944264,0.0000058312544,0.015105766,0.000022023487,0.00009701933,0.0023978935,0.9507616,0.00025337428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084207326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3259491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034926698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060076825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296934204","doi":"","title":"Canada - Criminal Code in 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Law; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.026653243167066944,"score_gpt":0.29938239892290797,"score_spread":0.272729155755841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296934204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30588663,0.00009218109,0.000041063377,0.010283856,0.00016689411,0.000059663133,0.000006546372,0.000021946144,0.6834412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755981,0.0000054177094,0.00011675163,0.00048167986,0.00012247106,0.0000020659345,0.0000010749544,0.0000018618645,0.023670567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993525,0.000035226192,0.00009002364,0.00008839503,0.00022299806,0.0002108186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998162,0.00005660962,0.000012886905,0.000051835068,0.000021895732,0.00004056461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020112014,0.000035983787,0.000051611725,0.000015829559,0.00012014033,0.00002430544,0.000109455825,0.00002209538,0.0005304626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003570459,0.000034001423,0.000011039272,0.00010377111,0.00005920622,0.00008181682,0.000009611753,0.00004147241,0.000018590694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007655228,0.000031548334,0.030726064,0.0000075358853,7.0602357e-7,0.00006877047,0.0006598968,0.000055630062,0.000053737727,0.38316694,0.5836704,0.0015511005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052900992,0.0000048794823,0.04177543,0.0000074290683,0.0000034192833,6.6788505e-7,0.0023302299,0.00001562759,0.00009825613,0.0015756191,0.95405215,0.00008339244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6697115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018307663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079951173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5808193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297412333","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-020","title":"Cutting off the Flow of Funds to Terrorists: Whose Funds? Which Funds? Who Decides?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Property (philosophy); Enforcement; Business; Terrorism; Flow of funds; Law and economics; Law; Convention; Subject (documents); Political science; Law enforcement; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04516146450924835,"score_gpt":0.27241493427602415,"score_spread":0.2272534697667758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297412333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047446587,0.0020702034,0.00019918385,0.0003623652,0.00032087963,0.0005222189,0.000087761066,0.00005855189,0.9959044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03388809,0.0014507344,0.00050093606,0.00008127864,0.0003685009,8.828644e-7,0.000007941777,0.00003565053,0.96366596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976113,0.00012862313,0.0003657819,0.00052032823,0.000891061,0.0004829098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975494,0.00033707684,0.0005198764,0.0007217301,0.0005866412,0.00028523253],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007024179,0.00034490315,0.00062808115,0.000050871044,0.0007436926,0.000066419816,0.0015306433,0.00041867042,0.0010281906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010965816,0.0003506329,0.00031393775,0.000009344687,0.0006482108,0.00031509687,0.0005292943,0.000303289,0.000016158698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010941707,0.000104016675,0.0002108997,0.0004980798,0.00067063124,0.00014035968,0.27099234,0.00012402328,0.000115401424,0.45962477,0.06905626,0.19736904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021067094,0.00013242691,0.00009197164,0.0006943492,0.00025987628,0.0000020087814,0.0045802374,0.000022517115,0.000027527889,0.0005741928,0.99304616,0.000358034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28885743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4835268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92398995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005401295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028970197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299148173","doi":"","title":"Requested Individual Testimony on Canadian Bill C-13","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Law; Political science; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.08752148932701544,"score_gpt":0.3369172204130936,"score_spread":0.24939573108607815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299148173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07734589,0.000032374242,0.000006167991,0.011568508,0.00026115827,0.000117419,0.0000047130925,0.00006806788,0.9105957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984545,0.000010899769,0.0003165463,0.0020807234,0.00006422223,0.0000040633813,0.0000016107879,0.0000047271897,0.012972219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990556,0.00010790295,0.00008499294,0.00014933172,0.0002594135,0.0003427418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993338,0.00013226726,0.000017278771,0.000117735835,0.00004855924,0.00035033317],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053643127,0.000062476414,0.00006490788,0.00006797927,0.0004411745,0.000089077796,0.00016761471,0.0000683505,0.0015933979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082465215,0.000046656725,0.00002403517,0.00022630733,0.00011491943,0.00012619859,0.000005030914,0.00008205124,0.00049917074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034308814,0.000038205853,0.025748562,0.0000029942757,0.000008477098,0.000047205398,0.005051186,0.000009446746,0.000017713188,0.8300355,0.13249414,0.0065431343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006252129,0.00005837388,0.010157633,0.000016279804,0.000008995858,0.0000015427964,0.002026072,0.0000019359484,0.000120956356,0.005272591,0.98213345,0.00013964305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84710276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9461094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9071991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011683777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005853281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299250469","doi":"10.14288/1.0077753","title":"A general perspective of Canadian constitutional interpretation as illustrated by the criminal law power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Power (physics); Criminal law; Constitutional law; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.023728478062008694,"score_gpt":0.2254467550614493,"score_spread":0.2017182769994406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299250469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7654238,0.00007542672,0.000077849734,0.00048380316,0.00008703125,0.00011210239,0.00011138288,0.000010982602,0.23361768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882066,0.000029791348,0.00010326692,0.00010572762,0.000011832887,2.2889698e-7,0.0000050639815,0.0000020779926,0.0009213492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993148,0.000085881424,0.00006985312,0.00015399234,0.00020572016,0.00016975815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929804,0.000029884271,0.00007021501,0.000083287974,0.00039137955,0.00012721281],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020336002,0.0000243228,0.000097319535,0.000035857796,0.0005430599,0.000039086866,0.00026210764,0.00006574424,0.00084777136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005219133,0.00006585903,0.00006355187,0.00024175792,0.002982473,0.00029671675,0.000023179375,0.00008008874,0.000013876814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021322588,0.00043618388,0.0075559844,0.0000639684,0.00026324467,0.00043710298,0.21572895,0.000010793544,0.00084619666,0.6656801,0.06077979,0.047984462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050173525,0.0002268222,0.6650602,0.0001633542,0.00015107765,0.0000689301,0.31321937,0.0000406167,0.000010459828,0.008913602,0.011359152,0.00028470202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99716634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99701375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015557888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005622803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300178100","doi":"","title":"Hearsay after Starr","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Law; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05110651621350291,"score_gpt":0.41332294812748943,"score_spread":0.3622164319139865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300178100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73408735,0.0003644083,0.00009560152,0.02780053,0.0001799626,0.00006233638,2.7733054e-7,0.0000659957,0.2373435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94453245,0.00013680547,0.00017560401,0.00046384466,0.0002103742,0.00000476247,1.677553e-7,0.0000034708366,0.054472543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943113,0.000044923494,0.000042976037,0.00009421102,0.00018270615,0.00020402066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973935,0.00004089642,0.000011827389,0.00009541805,0.00002623,0.00008630512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002296511,0.0000384386,0.00004929698,0.000013638558,0.00014707628,0.00004049722,0.00009004964,0.00003096053,0.002933208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061585495,0.000036097543,0.000026500906,0.00010872243,0.00009600402,0.000101287136,0.00001672086,0.000048526515,0.0006487442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048072098,0.00023538801,0.12339008,0.0000436322,0.00003135923,0.00069224404,0.47629142,0.000018381052,0.001239254,0.1209918,0.22218138,0.05440433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033523695,0.000013157445,0.0060279425,0.000009909261,0.0000040021814,0.0000013443981,0.006620222,0.000002059773,0.000030562944,0.00059298694,0.9866032,0.00006109947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008104617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065645706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003400485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042963013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300581667","doi":"","title":"Benefits Provided, Hidden and Denied: A Critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's Test in \"Auton v. British Columbia\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.017167560847835696,"score_gpt":0.24367490213500673,"score_spread":0.22650734128717104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300581667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959971,0.01580859,0.000038457492,0.012058932,0.00070388656,0.00050943845,0.0005511596,0.000007625384,0.010350879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453264,0.0005543323,0.00023687552,0.00016930877,0.00021513988,0.000025137844,0.000006079092,0.000005885605,0.004254604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846154,0.0001292643,0.0004264725,0.0001787249,0.00044617124,0.00035782644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983086,0.00076163566,0.0002105923,0.00012383302,0.0004548814,0.00014047368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009280361,0.00008302168,0.0002267838,0.000033228866,0.00031034875,0.000055407327,0.00023386235,0.00015653449,0.00013370762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030388706,0.00013006484,0.000058769783,0.0004068015,0.000986685,0.00040396125,0.000058388934,0.00018038925,0.0000011282602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043974796,0.00021138712,0.4516424,0.0005249834,0.000012325218,0.0000062100776,0.0011681647,0.00012321817,0.000067523724,0.5403299,0.0034037677,0.002505752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058580993,0.000028526832,0.9588847,0.0030778006,0.000101548576,0.00035360508,0.0017671408,0.00033066343,0.0001858995,0.015217812,0.019181497,0.0002849573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8863876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52511203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076219626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034122933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6053262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302104317","doi":"","title":"Canadian Evidence Law in a Nutshell","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.056341360550383315,"score_gpt":0.33541577639741815,"score_spread":0.27907441584703485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302104317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039312654,0.0005998903,0.0000011004155,0.00893833,0.00056177354,0.0002458211,0.0000055420273,0.00003677052,0.98957145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016531166,0.00043777088,0.000115045674,0.0017767359,0.0005304173,0.000010621743,0.0000038050982,0.00001506073,0.9805794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985071,0.00006289627,0.00019827961,0.0003212451,0.0003976283,0.0005128972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881715,0.00032661445,0.000051915613,0.00027669163,0.00008455447,0.00044306592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086297304,0.00015453855,0.00022002622,0.00013193513,0.0003017502,0.00013906528,0.0006408005,0.00059533666,0.0050721806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026022072,0.00015542403,0.00007522354,0.000094196905,0.00039459884,0.00028801002,0.000037920774,0.0006914193,0.001326369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022515403,0.000003326933,0.00007239703,0.000022005877,0.0000017916149,0.000069013884,0.0016291619,1.4777166e-7,0.0000020690584,0.849332,0.14781407,0.0010518183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018919145,0.000009854933,0.000026686499,0.00039911893,0.000009577226,0.0000010327295,0.00018390332,6.967556e-7,0.000002081989,0.026423343,0.9727184,0.00020636793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98376256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011000803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006339339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303367599","doi":"","title":"Reconsidering the Constitutionality of Mandatory Minimum Sentences Under Section 231(5)(e) Post-Luxton","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Criminal code; Charter; Supreme court; Life imprisonment; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Imprisonment; Due Process Clause; Criminal law; Psychology; Prison","score_opus":0.2818321278958325,"score_gpt":0.35729975043200346,"score_spread":0.07546762253617095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303367599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919643,0.00007638766,0.0005153564,0.0051459526,0.0006824007,0.00020050775,0.00003154452,0.000075571494,0.0013079735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547225,0.0001361424,0.000011417399,0.00025544976,0.00016824884,7.603704e-7,0.0000023622672,0.0000079640495,0.003945415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980376,0.00054784724,0.00023435036,0.00035086446,0.00048745578,0.00034187912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984788,0.0005131494,0.00021695232,0.00030780624,0.00032925952,0.00015408544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010715602,0.00015632092,0.00019383852,0.00014921789,0.00075845124,0.00010717654,0.00055798615,0.00015008257,0.0001403235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020423693,0.00011568845,0.0001306667,0.00027773992,0.0012401837,0.0017301154,0.00015953663,0.00020676105,0.00007019843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010972738,0.000047691607,0.9862875,0.000028485569,0.000044776007,0.00003106571,0.0016056821,0.0000050046906,0.004327686,0.0067765396,0.000004729481,0.0007311088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006332622,0.00010618997,0.95066977,0.00050043286,0.00011844637,0.000030607862,0.0125219915,5.453498e-8,0.004134799,0.0015376846,0.029376345,0.0003704439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001523527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03173667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03561776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024684842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035643988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98593163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306320626","doi":"","title":"Terrorism, Law & Democracy: How is Canada Changing Following September 11","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.024377414429212138,"score_gpt":0.2948682507291748,"score_spread":0.2704908362999626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306320626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31685352,0.0001815329,0.00015697516,0.19145305,0.000786274,0.00015445886,0.0000027031858,0.000121827485,0.49028966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200167,0.0000042879637,0.00045084138,0.006371215,0.000449156,0.0000035264618,7.261178e-7,0.000007682022,0.07269588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987527,0.00004060553,0.000093985094,0.00018579478,0.0004401218,0.00048676957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999582,0.00007441603,0.00003070661,0.00012681623,0.00003094613,0.00015514281],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029687068,0.00009088468,0.000113057446,0.000024065259,0.00087630906,0.00011584352,0.00019996418,0.000047833786,0.00096036703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030607927,0.000084267296,0.000078308076,0.00017599385,0.000051286483,0.0004684586,0.000042313095,0.000067641995,0.000062720115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005908911,0.000039031213,0.012399847,0.00002425007,0.0000527078,0.00011921508,0.04257097,0.000017733024,0.00020944494,0.16203552,0.76778936,0.014736015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005277612,0.000003474871,0.00011841623,0.000019261735,0.000016728358,9.399099e-7,0.012569901,0.00006416221,0.0004955544,0.00018594062,0.9863291,0.00014374348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8706309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99525744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6031632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022258966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026670058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311034161","doi":"","title":"The Analytical Structure of Reasonableness Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Deference; Political science; Law; Nothing; Law and economics; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01954854158999688,"score_gpt":0.33863660061885276,"score_spread":0.3190880590288559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311034161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35361475,0.5998616,0.00047968718,0.028977076,0.000930241,0.00035006,0.0000029719731,0.00002897879,0.015754648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85373247,0.14434981,0.000007926516,0.00008469307,0.00041396293,5.506212e-7,2.3139555e-7,0.000004045894,0.0014063178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974675,0.00024008003,0.00019773724,0.000060220176,0.00040870186,0.0016257627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993555,0.0001603792,0.00013413205,0.00011648183,0.000118156146,0.00011537864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004106902,0.00006306429,0.0001323526,0.000014608236,0.0006132466,0.00002847379,0.00034947167,0.00004481153,0.000097881384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058351265,0.00003819283,0.00009316663,0.00019410667,0.0002436991,0.00025522048,0.000020524212,0.0007182044,0.0000071381137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010324348,0.0000119874285,0.0061432165,0.000024355524,0.000031151336,2.4353193e-7,0.0003062573,3.6491613e-7,0.000015946642,0.9733064,0.0010929991,0.01905676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018657344,0.0001352352,0.0076429583,0.00073853356,0.0003373094,0.00020391897,0.011772386,0.0000059009835,0.00006705496,0.2969377,0.6816994,0.0002730111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043583292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040597674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003081749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014225164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47166592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313177308","doi":"10.2307/744302","title":"The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Face (sociological concept); Penal code; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.0707177499783157,"score_gpt":0.3285282453521934,"score_spread":0.2578104953738777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313177308","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009867302,0.74555916,0.0000024344522,0.0026712138,0.000103890285,0.00008125321,0.0000011871623,0.000013085663,0.25058103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10964267,0.8497957,0.00006283243,0.0030245995,0.00009703382,0.000015331749,0.0000019602187,0.000005193389,0.03735465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918544,0.0001578989,0.00021118886,0.00011601502,0.00020483727,0.00012462631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950886,0.0001573602,0.00006463241,0.00015339539,0.00004413179,0.000071594935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007358844,0.00005493998,0.0002843579,0.000015738782,0.000389434,0.000008444233,0.00015465058,0.000026267293,0.0015489304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048931084,0.000038317507,0.00014627783,0.0001610404,0.00046822443,0.000065086424,0.000008038385,0.00005424585,0.000015015667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001767032,0.000039425344,0.00012373742,0.00058398343,0.00010456369,0.000004133403,0.0029638966,4.3026125e-7,0.0000055959813,0.78492016,0.10526904,0.10596738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013514797,0.000015267491,0.00020716425,0.00014283558,0.0011169394,4.6376877e-7,0.00004760148,0.0000017679354,1.8678122e-7,0.00012360995,0.99828,0.000050687875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010888066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011638393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028712375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000588174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317275053","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1462","title":"The Legislative History of Mandatory Minimum Penalties of Imprisonment in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Legislature; Legislative history; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030787884353172725,"score_gpt":0.26648430801171247,"score_spread":0.23569642365853974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317275053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08344344,0.005757115,0.000024157192,0.0029304519,0.0009681417,0.0001096958,0.0000036766735,0.0000032229818,0.9067601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956221,0.0015588644,0.00005373495,0.00007700845,0.000087859546,0.0000018267536,1.6213478e-7,0.000004376196,0.0025940791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985233,0.00020274826,0.00036060475,0.000081987964,0.00057120644,0.00026014444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991414,0.000260591,0.0002898731,0.000109387576,0.000102387705,0.00009638252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010019197,0.00007133393,0.00016476482,0.000024000647,0.00027649838,0.000014117881,0.00032796056,0.00003103599,0.00020969735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007485185,0.00005363094,0.000057778507,0.000057782392,0.00042418553,0.0001776344,0.000031343243,0.00019967966,0.0000013611026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004582331,0.00018886966,0.058226205,0.00005502942,0.00010257705,0.0002449338,0.06412569,0.00018784008,0.00070177804,0.8199631,0.03996799,0.015777761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037707857,0.00010104588,0.0077148513,0.00015145268,0.000027454973,0.00002918453,0.027216004,0.00003247811,0.00014134122,0.008055733,0.9559956,0.00015777178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99259186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016195114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021295946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4234966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319399261","doi":"10.7202/1027416ar","title":"Simon DesCôteaux, Guide du praticien pour le partage des régimes de retraite, Brossard, Publications CCH Ltée, 2002, 209 pages, ISBN 2-89366-350-8 Jean-Claude Hébert, Le droit pénal des affaires. Éditions Yvon Blais, Cowansville, 2002, 831 pages, ISBN 2-89451-607-X Hubert Reid, La réforme du Code de procédure civile, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2002, 395 pages, ISBN 2-89127-575-6","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.028630920733541034,"score_gpt":0.2616395813973873,"score_spread":0.23300866066384626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319399261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106826,0.19564709,0.04071256,0.1868099,0.001817912,0.0079077715,0.004817991,0.002711395,0.45274937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.456174,0.16660257,0.033008393,0.0022073544,0.0027197422,0.001447149,0.0010011271,0.0007338799,0.3361058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837135,0.0030049062,0.0030364913,0.002922967,0.0019610026,0.0053611016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98874736,0.0028707755,0.0016455831,0.0024432417,0.0016949202,0.002598151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006776104,0.0018292334,0.002175588,0.00078310154,0.006283152,0.0023289649,0.0028974789,0.0021576497,0.003495908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007905504,0.002479808,0.0012931725,0.0040769456,0.0052207178,0.004797814,0.0004657005,0.002605567,0.0012692098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019196868,0.0029970217,0.010830612,0.0014374016,0.0004429996,0.0005937993,0.007630826,0.0022849634,0.0020748721,0.07737445,0.8886627,0.0054783877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002488994,0.00047159064,0.013428363,0.003033126,0.0011501585,0.0015287789,0.008256403,0.004013658,0.0015813262,0.026362754,0.9345415,0.0031433038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053165536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28779656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34934798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036060717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005979689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322183196","doi":"10.5623/cig2013-023","title":"Doubtful Boundaries, Hierarchy of Evidence, Well Triangulated Evidence and Procedural Diligence: <i>Morrison v. Van Den Tillaart</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hierarchy; Diligence; Due diligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.0843028826421699,"score_gpt":0.3440898575742523,"score_spread":0.2597869749320824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322183196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96587116,0.0048821596,0.00017198958,0.019821314,0.000350296,0.0015205016,0.0000044809276,0.00016044344,0.007217635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439824,0.0006535539,0.001155129,0.00035792505,0.00014919048,0.000069817885,0.0000017282799,0.000015278312,0.0031991533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727476,0.00028598524,0.00059017836,0.00040753285,0.00082441804,0.00061713206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977328,0.0009723933,0.0002533668,0.00038235492,0.0003355057,0.0003235356],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233197,0.00021743841,0.0004063114,0.00010157015,0.0008400779,0.0005144982,0.00052784395,0.00015634771,0.0017187856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027715685,0.00017048155,0.0000911343,0.0005586092,0.0016015859,0.0015001711,0.00014599503,0.00017606311,0.0004046047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011180635,0.0008772278,0.16537963,0.00585396,0.00044142996,0.000107242464,0.24060051,0.000058708654,0.021484843,0.077519216,0.32437623,0.16218294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020162247,0.0021452343,0.16450791,0.013438016,0.001060674,0.0001179759,0.03579884,0.0025955208,0.012447718,0.1379265,0.62460536,0.0033400347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105851535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015156706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30022913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008080582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005198044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324944905","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000294636.99123.bf","title":"Fighting C. Difficile","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.054503347554294125,"score_gpt":0.36510889292721227,"score_spread":0.3106055453729181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324944905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094769344,0.0016803514,0.00027440986,0.02523035,0.0028150093,0.00013574869,9.7258e-7,0.00013152312,0.8749623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92498124,0.00045234157,0.0000841004,0.00012549345,0.004899575,0.000008889069,0.0000053348135,0.0000093606495,0.06943368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986612,0.00007861951,0.00031868648,0.00018785032,0.00043110555,0.00032253456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995289,0.00007120518,0.000080986596,0.00014745229,0.00007221924,0.000099271056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044018618,0.00009088307,0.00013958038,0.00004425251,0.00043565873,0.000004658606,0.00020598722,0.000049192928,0.016781492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004156326,0.000073011535,0.00004958877,0.00029977475,0.00014781211,0.00011556516,0.000019576248,0.0000891493,0.0002234256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043980017,0.000030524778,0.009026236,0.0000119734605,0.0000025802026,0.000005057008,0.0033468863,0.000006502279,0.0009512233,0.05012843,0.9337078,0.0027784328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009488542,0.00003445206,0.0038053899,0.00003585086,0.000016547363,4.4599096e-7,0.0028841363,0.000013331103,0.00004519786,0.004190445,0.988775,0.00010429313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07165944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021253712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8302119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038086753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041733525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325869288","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2015.1084787","title":"The Prime Minister v the Chief Justice of Canada: the Attorney General's failure of responsibility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10879450810990925,"score_gpt":0.37673589949381714,"score_spread":0.2679413913839079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325869288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2544748,0.0009260874,0.000053245072,0.67638737,0.001321051,0.00043159295,0.000031382635,0.000016750526,0.06635769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914459,0.000033542074,0.00009030865,0.001841502,0.00027108635,0.0000045773572,5.162255e-7,0.000004695842,0.00630785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970646,0.0012844182,0.0002541829,0.00013426351,0.0010180864,0.0002444788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949615,0.003776317,0.00016165941,0.0005002369,0.0005130865,0.000087193504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00820195,0.00007696488,0.000118965116,0.000006083965,0.0009921096,0.00006172486,0.00076640636,0.00013104638,0.000011007791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008386581,0.00003571448,0.00005625056,0.0001836482,0.0016162617,0.00009244168,0.00010379332,0.00066148775,0.0000024666056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019385487,0.000024371928,0.0004096518,0.00005105383,0.00002280033,0.0000035325934,0.055352006,0.000050875195,0.0002186628,0.8731785,0.07012466,0.0003700526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055773016,0.00003526953,0.0020307435,0.000019131608,0.000056672965,0.0000014206719,0.017559743,0.000027755363,0.0005133568,0.0021220918,0.97751915,0.00005888822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6788512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90739447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009874027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00650915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327512905","doi":"","title":"Coherence and the Committed Civilian: Justice Lebel's Contributions to Canadian Accident Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Accident (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Economics; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023814389727191007,"score_gpt":0.3298915477457478,"score_spread":0.3060771580185568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327512905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13464725,0.0106585,0.0018008519,0.76825,0.0014648838,0.0010512575,0.000024166908,0.0000756573,0.08202743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473435,0.0005984016,0.000016393004,0.0024593517,0.00044494122,0.000009432394,9.156512e-7,0.0000057586703,0.0017304862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972242,0.00036088872,0.00017356602,0.00013055827,0.00036133168,0.0017494715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984756,0.00023818323,0.00006535311,0.00012757609,0.00041144405,0.0006818512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005123725,0.000092754184,0.0001432747,0.00004497668,0.0017542708,0.0002631813,0.00042695305,0.000061069295,0.00003115669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001330912,0.00006852281,0.00004421615,0.00023018138,0.0004242636,0.00023803319,0.00003667779,0.00088389125,0.00006949894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004958719,0.000006608071,0.00027748817,8.053108e-7,0.000020230393,0.000004409831,0.0029824795,0.00000887035,0.0000036863696,0.9901709,0.0051855696,0.0012893948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011826815,0.00017184488,0.00039798638,0.00003862137,0.00018620878,0.00019035325,0.050433874,0.00001808909,0.000011866703,0.38698158,0.5601704,0.00021648526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63149685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86008704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021794257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008192454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329886300","doi":"10.1515/jetl-2013-0006","title":"Jacques De Mol,Le dommage psychique – Du traumatisme à l’expertise (Larcier, Bruxelles 2012). xviii + 314 pp. ISBN-10: 2804451968; ISNB-13: 9782804451967. € 90.00 (paperback).","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Tort Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tort; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.024034279821950843,"score_gpt":0.2709604210683596,"score_spread":0.24692614124640877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329886300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15840842,0.16778482,0.0006720263,0.065828145,0.0054502874,0.0007624577,0.000050211816,0.00014537085,0.60089827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657181,0.04930963,0.004121527,0.00604424,0.008416298,0.000013226739,0.000007992949,0.00022451808,0.06614443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918433,0.0026613437,0.0020536566,0.0006438705,0.0013058484,0.0014920274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952436,0.00044209795,0.0014263889,0.00069797155,0.00081667135,0.0013732552],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038087496,0.000743916,0.0010413658,0.000110529356,0.0013005935,0.00092491787,0.0019246142,0.00033069064,0.012290285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032871813,0.00068636215,0.00085040496,0.0004468387,0.0018510175,0.00394339,0.00027882593,0.0011254528,0.0036834683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022486359,0.0010680549,0.00054418936,0.00020951375,0.00025454361,0.0012240397,0.014139735,0.0000984339,0.003653777,0.097823136,0.8595319,0.021227809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011405107,0.000766661,0.0068806377,0.0010382648,0.00021042778,0.0007097508,0.0026842777,0.00010046076,0.00032208828,0.0019829774,0.98333716,0.00082680065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016269842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029494353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004683902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062586594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331213455","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpr193","title":"Recipe for a new tort? Common law right to privacy in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Denial; Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.11533280217112857,"score_gpt":0.3759141895787113,"score_spread":0.26058138740758274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331213455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18679021,0.001701553,0.0026201257,0.10928876,0.003466268,0.0018911139,0.0000028247073,0.00005335627,0.6941858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96694535,0.00007868347,0.011318573,0.00617473,0.0011917951,0.000009529867,6.2120654e-7,0.000021334774,0.014259368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975241,0.00043237646,0.00068382727,0.00016745675,0.00061892497,0.00057330896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956438,0.002771687,0.00037345264,0.0001920818,0.00047421514,0.0005447848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038599507,0.00016632558,0.00036872827,0.00009903935,0.00042722156,0.000218405,0.0005699375,0.00012732438,0.0010746884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007931197,0.00010678654,0.00015133768,0.0003074034,0.00014787554,0.0031448088,0.00009293313,0.0006866883,0.00017270318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012096484,0.0019151812,0.001129884,0.00005415903,0.00020110427,0.00010667728,0.47737914,0.00003996472,0.0012622322,0.21463975,0.2648173,0.02635809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003308621,0.000846646,0.000056849138,0.00016679149,0.00008393837,0.000120937184,0.0033800085,0.0000029909197,0.00071473594,0.0010113505,0.99309605,0.00018880832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42947307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.662481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008771778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010545041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333036059","doi":"","title":"Reconciliation and Third-Party Interests: Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; White (mutation); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02995919190446803,"score_gpt":0.3040051644537528,"score_spread":0.27404597254928476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333036059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928812,0.00002491548,0.000012713243,0.0018709922,0.00034083807,0.00009913035,0.0000011737545,0.000036873487,0.068801366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011385,0.000073095645,0.00025343918,0.0001777073,0.000106879386,0.0000062031545,0.000001368558,0.0000022642844,0.009265196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945503,0.00004369406,0.00011084101,0.00013310794,0.00013621495,0.000121110046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997177,0.00008719746,0.000028846682,0.000052467476,0.0000611051,0.000052688574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065451855,0.000025709276,0.000056553865,0.000014013843,0.00018870765,0.00038633792,0.00007264625,0.00007097504,0.00090483134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052579434,0.000039070448,0.000012738988,0.0000915811,0.000111691064,0.00039666952,0.000016511622,0.000111139925,0.000022044616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012870207,0.00009071836,0.69167197,0.000028976241,0.0000047979934,0.000015694475,0.010969553,4.7671946e-7,0.002584328,0.03997938,0.090008005,0.1646332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002801326,0.00003950508,0.73069984,0.0000628686,0.0000066510734,0.000007921344,0.0050454675,0.00015002566,0.00007204689,0.017310785,0.24612167,0.0002031005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40417165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99115574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5869841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003210772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005145698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335441580","doi":"10.14288/1.0102845","title":"Parole, public safety and the administration of justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); Political science; Criminology; Administration of justice; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.014895006089976773,"score_gpt":0.22451115133868643,"score_spread":0.20961614524870967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335441580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97915816,0.0000578291,0.00010915302,0.0033250444,0.00012952716,0.00012051809,0.00002271965,0.000014647989,0.017062414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873805,0.0002750757,0.00013095427,0.000028740871,0.000036038185,1.0725398e-7,0.000001812853,0.0000018067987,0.00078738434],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994119,0.00008336509,0.000073621515,0.00011932337,0.00019862482,0.00011320137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939334,0.00016989256,0.00009451165,0.00011226095,0.00015804498,0.000071922695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066855917,0.000015501282,0.00011128495,0.000010138375,0.0005874689,0.000079217614,0.00022370373,0.00006246608,0.00012049699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024369718,0.000042631393,0.000042625456,0.00013463762,0.0014541035,0.00030847,0.000047257516,0.00009778738,0.000002798865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028184688,0.00015578482,0.012036927,0.00017478564,0.000038292284,0.0000446433,0.007215257,6.574201e-7,0.0003566664,0.012151104,0.0044787214,0.9630653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005155893,0.000029369994,0.9708971,0.000025641277,0.00006880282,0.000012497049,0.012451686,0.000028977916,4.9747536e-7,0.0010861215,0.014821139,0.00006257514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2269405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8856082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96300274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009464869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014184978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77820736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336643544","doi":"","title":"Relevance, Social Context and Poverty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Commit; Inference; Context (archaeology); Jury; Common sense; Order (exchange); Psychology; Criminal justice; Poverty; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01647448164382174,"score_gpt":0.2954714832558532,"score_spread":0.27899700161203145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336643544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73707956,0.011694669,0.0074610165,0.20421761,0.00092788815,0.00025638397,0.000006015048,0.00012503214,0.038231827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756845,0.00909196,0.000010561849,0.00037187303,0.000677627,0.000001313461,7.273186e-8,0.0000067435467,0.014155319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997955,0.00011496924,0.0001290225,0.00012424908,0.00026579518,0.001410968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957687,0.00014035527,0.00007706567,0.00004562664,0.00007120292,0.00008887028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015652683,0.000071480026,0.00010652289,0.000029211287,0.0008420297,0.000058714282,0.00016601443,0.000061972016,0.00008826245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027206496,0.00004709426,0.000055469765,0.000073072144,0.00022145755,0.00036002373,0.000020985624,0.0004121717,0.0000465493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035746405,0.000008662595,0.00075957633,0.0000010145479,0.000015175065,0.0000018055765,0.0009366665,1.0035475e-8,0.000257874,0.6869865,0.0022629618,0.30873397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004339001,0.00011445676,0.00080681185,0.000028551585,0.000019863135,0.00006582485,0.008443877,3.1294718e-7,0.000031023148,0.39571676,0.59419936,0.00013923853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004834344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014426825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5919364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060472125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013353647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8050507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337467981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1466","title":"Searching for Smith: The Constitutionality of Mandatory Sentences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Parliament; Punitive damages; Proportionality (law); Political science; Constitutional review; Constitution; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.09996215917625473,"score_gpt":0.391120778265037,"score_spread":0.29115861908878227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337467981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169484,0.0016066531,0.0068490584,0.023589673,0.0009831985,0.00033557942,0.000019640756,0.000029408382,0.92489195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978179,0.00041472816,0.0007226162,0.00021070805,0.000462495,0.0000038488215,5.6799985e-7,0.0000030994047,0.00036406855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987654,0.00020847356,0.0002182764,0.00009706298,0.00045264664,0.00025811084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898756,0.00045580475,0.00013498108,0.000091796945,0.00021784489,0.00011201515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00251274,0.00006143374,0.000110683664,0.000018261055,0.0020377005,0.00011633304,0.00034587784,0.000038575068,0.00016170045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026172466,0.00004128854,0.00011758113,0.00007575291,0.0010416247,0.00029932932,0.000028069291,0.00018598881,0.000006933622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039206367,0.000028548335,0.0029697446,0.000010681821,0.000016060661,0.000008150873,0.0009804949,0.000035070443,0.0000574162,0.99281985,0.0006835197,0.0023512335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004155024,0.00008724925,0.0025869126,0.00020193512,0.0000631944,0.000216616,0.010532866,0.0000786311,0.00019192878,0.30499628,0.6804613,0.00016759663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034203097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10722784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95612305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048659855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026587673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337488397","doi":"10.7202/1035637ar","title":"Arbitres de griefs, tribunaux des droits de la personne et normes de contrôle judiciaire : une critique des arrêts Ross et Green Bay","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02014792303526885,"score_gpt":0.3175606948947046,"score_spread":0.29741277185943576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337488397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90487754,0.010540836,0.0036520746,0.052362666,0.00024006146,0.0003582565,0.00021438843,0.00018447553,0.027569696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676365,0.01209669,0.0025655802,0.0018681964,0.00093142124,0.00008547067,0.0000101135965,0.00007782891,0.01472819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470246,0.0017226525,0.00053292426,0.0006677936,0.00039787203,0.001976292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958107,0.0024171318,0.00024128419,0.00040535894,0.00028635777,0.0008391735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040515345,0.00039046953,0.00066918234,0.000110721834,0.0009822934,0.00032750497,0.00077343785,0.0006299282,0.00031215625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025727923,0.00046412545,0.00039868167,0.00060737896,0.0030311428,0.0011906981,0.00013442745,0.0005733954,0.00013412249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003203494,0.00061315624,0.15236156,0.0012161627,0.0002218395,0.0016874669,0.07938454,0.00009625173,0.010438011,0.67931896,0.0071614427,0.06718025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015074221,0.0004551685,0.15732199,0.0064758556,0.00046450956,0.0010939086,0.00928636,0.00028009215,0.004618482,0.7714108,0.04585871,0.0012266991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077058464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1305618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092091836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018517681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013181141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337802252","doi":"10.14288/1.0076625","title":"The Canadian Criminal Code: Past, Present, and Future?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.028706611623950117,"score_gpt":0.217428137935286,"score_spread":0.1887215263113359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337802252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123003,0.00046216292,0.000009840973,0.004658754,0.00027289006,0.00018043471,0.000053261083,0.000029913683,0.08203248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967966,0.00051286304,0.00010355516,0.000041320865,0.00025631292,2.36143e-7,0.0000010929098,0.0000037319355,0.0022842675],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921054,0.00007803952,0.00005380965,0.00017315152,0.00020488582,0.00027958525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.00004398297,0.000046316174,0.00013086668,0.00013086603,0.0002643457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003329671,0.000022789389,0.00008606487,0.000016112588,0.002071529,0.00015547159,0.00033986793,0.00007223618,0.00016372214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012706969,0.000065819826,0.00004213427,0.000117373,0.00095509697,0.00025469277,0.00005364571,0.000086976426,0.000012292058],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011871286,0.000027290593,0.022426046,0.000023148468,0.000019261048,0.00016638504,0.012135843,4.8285983e-8,0.000002422469,0.0006228958,0.05575814,0.9088066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082056344,0.000020425168,0.734626,0.0000151577315,0.00002423404,0.000010034966,0.02304665,0.000002661589,5.9434853e-8,0.0005717633,0.24153538,0.00006555745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9087411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006942116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024559285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338010741","doi":"10.14288/1.0077737","title":"Terrorism and the administration of justice in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Administration (probate law); Political science; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Administration of justice; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02157187330370656,"score_gpt":0.20253212678228802,"score_spread":0.18096025347858147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338010741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894416,0.00006836127,0.0000136959425,0.00033573632,0.0000656676,0.000079201345,0.000009823052,0.0000028288616,0.009983135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958205,0.00012181192,0.000058116628,0.000019523999,0.0000078667645,9.734243e-8,4.0887593e-7,0.0000010413611,0.00020905833],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958116,0.00006515882,0.000056450892,0.000080685706,0.0001345431,0.00008202033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997322,0.000063108935,0.000057925303,0.000059511178,0.00005080767,0.00003647963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024776146,0.000010763556,0.000084072555,0.0000069152793,0.00014595305,0.000010961676,0.00013904452,0.000023201343,0.000058182315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000507655,0.00003091251,0.000015768514,0.00009061587,0.00042226052,0.00013633257,0.0000248888,0.000040941064,4.197692e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041425577,0.00017593837,0.15937816,0.0003564893,0.000038658283,0.00054043025,0.067546114,0.00000192633,0.00004663438,0.0015414243,0.0072546224,0.7627053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025981574,0.000014467696,0.9480587,0.0000416288,0.000025155043,0.000003793008,0.050835405,0.000012305707,3.7908725e-7,0.00042511418,0.00028921064,0.000034029366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78868055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052098538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047570423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15558365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338304353","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448","title":"Hearsay by Implication: <i>R</i> v <i>Baldree</i>","year":2014,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0907127877805838,"score_gpt":0.3793831550748223,"score_spread":0.2886703672942385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338304353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071927965,0.023370303,0.0070376163,0.8778459,0.008207883,0.0006688153,0.000031916417,0.000038319435,0.010871289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98254424,0.0045988215,0.0002440477,0.0048117386,0.0038980874,0.000007405371,0.0000015458338,0.000020946516,0.0038731445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946864,0.0006766608,0.0011276432,0.0003094429,0.002755423,0.00044440737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938444,0.0020901635,0.0014112563,0.00042139628,0.0019605218,0.00027227355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069047865,0.00025744026,0.00038544514,0.00009111891,0.00047056348,0.00060413755,0.003988841,0.00014024063,0.0006933303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029714017,0.00016054326,0.0003614017,0.00032524197,0.00070543645,0.0015101332,0.00027439103,0.0006449015,0.00028306033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006051832,0.00032550865,0.0025181593,0.00004708611,0.00033087737,0.000029095087,0.0082656685,0.00013338099,0.020636097,0.023568416,0.8466197,0.09692078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037099706,0.00049702585,0.0010291077,0.0016609905,0.00019490316,0.00028039608,0.0011404594,0.000116360374,0.006921395,0.0096071595,0.9778745,0.00030671057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008607164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016282382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005839387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75914806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339012338","doi":"","title":"Separating Minimal Impairment from Balancing: A Comment on R. v. Sharpe (B.C.C.A.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Balancing test; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01819409341828528,"score_gpt":0.30873847043149727,"score_spread":0.290544377013212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339012338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93613046,0.001486232,0.00010304428,0.033484273,0.00023717381,0.00017775508,0.0000054258694,0.00005970984,0.0283159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991264,0.0023341477,0.000084609055,0.0018356302,0.0008892091,0.0000062746944,0.0000031892168,0.000012555032,0.003570405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965918,0.00021779379,0.00028148905,0.00022459656,0.000581267,0.0021030586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.00014972499,0.00010299247,0.00013317725,0.00004179185,0.00018493859],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019017897,0.00014632066,0.00017485162,0.00003993594,0.00097501994,0.00016022129,0.00036411243,0.000071805836,0.0018143046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053596643,0.00013145209,0.00012719962,0.00012910787,0.00007730057,0.00022145925,0.00001816984,0.0010743495,0.0003481443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015299043,0.0012427886,0.012650874,0.000013627428,0.00049652345,0.00012066203,0.03954695,0.00041955584,0.00057540904,0.4516266,0.05834459,0.4334325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012115571,0.0018466709,0.0027074167,0.0002029047,0.00009291016,0.00007450089,0.0250686,0.00021091315,0.00013651655,0.12050368,0.8473814,0.00056290114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005451064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008050243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78903687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015456933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014629072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340332448","doi":"10.7202/1035752ar","title":"Le renvoi des jeunes contrevenants devant une juridiction compétente pour adulte","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02720262707741394,"score_gpt":0.274729090381779,"score_spread":0.24752646330436506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340332448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8239952,0.010791038,0.0076026106,0.12625301,0.002456261,0.0004697081,0.0001263473,0.00017882236,0.028127046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142462,0.008623222,0.0008073702,0.0002092407,0.001283628,0.000020881496,0.000004727859,0.000032588378,0.07477214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736243,0.00036710763,0.00045899005,0.00048729844,0.00030199348,0.0010221483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845284,0.00036343565,0.00024704836,0.00033022198,0.00020958086,0.00039685747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075529265,0.00020433473,0.00040969896,0.00006815965,0.00068896776,0.00008327194,0.00040804356,0.00023335748,0.00022104057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003954994,0.00023246033,0.0002501511,0.0004137675,0.0010034147,0.00068007683,0.000076891265,0.0001744922,0.001059032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031199682,0.00073089567,0.045575593,0.0009055046,0.00019621654,0.00039527164,0.011861814,0.000055748467,0.01584399,0.5605391,0.03844701,0.32513684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020644665,0.0003659955,0.060296178,0.008909054,0.00042779557,0.00036567333,0.0063841366,0.000438045,0.003995082,0.3230675,0.59249103,0.0011950653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016993977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019316776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005082126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045203394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340512580","doi":"10.7202/1035212ar","title":"Le parcours tumultueux des propos injurieux en droit québécois depuis 2009 : l’arrêt Génex Communications inc. c. Association québécoise de l’industrie du disque, du spectacle et de la vidéo (ADISQ) est-il toujours pertinent ?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.010520626253903992,"score_gpt":0.2711744292725134,"score_spread":0.2606538030186094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340512580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83240265,0.002141241,0.0035931033,0.13592242,0.000283806,0.0006230171,0.0002588547,0.00022398787,0.024550928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717547,0.01051616,0.0020473592,0.0013402617,0.00061802793,0.00014966514,0.00003376588,0.000086369284,0.013453648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351186,0.0028140345,0.00073138403,0.0006209164,0.00076376717,0.0015580591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940332,0.003315097,0.0005933374,0.000854726,0.00037123825,0.0008324082],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004735354,0.00047740992,0.0005468466,0.00015608247,0.0020496591,0.0003875142,0.0016209938,0.0010947426,0.00025087156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005163613,0.000491613,0.0003315455,0.0006608572,0.0037598868,0.0011044394,0.00025148122,0.0012222641,0.00014825062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019891474,0.0012091168,0.16728944,0.000115519986,0.00028026715,0.00012561223,0.10060307,0.000101301055,0.0020275335,0.65358216,0.019350829,0.05511627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019439269,0.0004984077,0.15719771,0.0011960994,0.0009976722,0.00019731277,0.05032102,0.00086391205,0.0021742522,0.10696175,0.6758371,0.0018108223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30947435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39057618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6564863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105071375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041143573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340524384","doi":"10.7202/1035667ar","title":"Les sûretés en questions : Les tendances jurisprudentielles récentes","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.03183956810808285,"score_gpt":0.31541612146937437,"score_spread":0.2835765533612915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340524384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6563615,0.069132976,0.0037742064,0.16614491,0.0030277546,0.00054434646,0.00023377824,0.00033294444,0.10044758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8529585,0.023764413,0.0008873755,0.00008278858,0.00174922,0.000032297656,0.0000034504062,0.000029056147,0.12049293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747163,0.0004272575,0.00042787293,0.0004955249,0.00035460136,0.000823122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981731,0.0008551862,0.00019295773,0.0003401067,0.00013745202,0.00030118192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007988891,0.00021341616,0.00035383226,0.00008731189,0.00078707637,0.00014032175,0.00067638676,0.00033313685,0.0018341814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058566086,0.00023880975,0.00027816833,0.00034522972,0.0011138304,0.0006283407,0.00011594079,0.00024891822,0.0007802891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021570419,0.00017463444,0.032247763,0.00037647405,0.000053913915,0.0000827361,0.00537029,0.000009601724,0.001258787,0.63485247,0.008197983,0.31735376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029274513,0.00015719191,0.026251912,0.005944208,0.0002280591,0.000087450586,0.0049512177,0.0000481756,0.0010905451,0.106272325,0.8539818,0.0006943732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014609187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009904759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8457838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005564568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020195972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341321733","doi":"","title":"The Origins, Evolution and Puzzling Irrelevance of Jury Recommendations in Second-Degree Murder Sentencing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Jurisprudence; Verdict; Political science; Law; Hung jury; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Jury instructions; Reasonable doubt; Power (physics); Criminal code; Criminal justice; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.048474277384341256,"score_gpt":0.33244473106061995,"score_spread":0.2839704536762787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341321733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643948,0.0130795725,0.0025536765,0.016492197,0.00053823716,0.00013757608,0.0000012392165,0.000015562528,0.0027871057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324936,0.005733091,0.00009487732,0.000024065363,0.00016740237,0.0000021063238,3.390568e-7,0.0000045759307,0.00072417187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984253,0.00017964777,0.00022850416,0.00009720986,0.00023068221,0.00083864137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940944,0.00017810175,0.00013644907,0.00007025005,0.00013418823,0.000071597344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004459205,0.000059024358,0.00008915802,0.000054148917,0.0004972608,0.00005213609,0.0001683968,0.00003966955,0.00000827427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003896499,0.000046326313,0.000029542809,0.00019662373,0.00012600161,0.00035853864,0.000022556236,0.0006675283,0.0000036291553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006667664,0.000036035253,0.010421662,0.000008260928,0.000038199687,0.0000019281808,0.0065322313,0.000054808752,0.00020035799,0.8713928,0.00074169686,0.11050537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007942674,0.00021058296,0.005120142,0.00017445664,0.000039118622,0.0001352453,0.21602237,0.00031844608,0.000043576096,0.6251615,0.15172786,0.0002523989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026643574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19088234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24623124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013479746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023700106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8238819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341543272","doi":"10.7202/1035885ar","title":"Le droit d’être entendu et l’évocation","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.026870498053830273,"score_gpt":0.28610250694236244,"score_spread":0.25923200888853215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341543272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35548383,0.00384514,0.005289671,0.30973324,0.0026774372,0.0004994675,0.00009646952,0.00020143087,0.3221733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930024,0.003361326,0.00036490825,0.0006566381,0.0010899693,0.000026046753,0.000008706672,0.000027809592,0.10146218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791867,0.0002723748,0.00034397366,0.00044981713,0.00030320516,0.00071198936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986705,0.00033474943,0.000180851,0.00038428488,0.00013334618,0.0002962256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097472453,0.00014991614,0.00026897487,0.000062523635,0.00033447644,0.00009410636,0.0004639923,0.00025805965,0.0007717316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038660548,0.00019860976,0.00020516124,0.00035022097,0.00051104114,0.0008492558,0.00007443076,0.00018960325,0.0018451089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019799018,0.00013356887,0.002931947,0.00012718163,0.000021772581,0.00005708685,0.0030004075,0.000006280832,0.0012643192,0.912223,0.0070411502,0.07317352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005352602,0.000158727,0.010932593,0.0017613592,0.00013037666,0.00012898356,0.0023164707,0.000093395836,0.0011245158,0.36686182,0.61533785,0.00061867107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00758199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00799476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6082967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005171312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004813445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341790205","doi":"","title":"Nothing Plus Nothing Equals... Something? A Proposal for FLIR Warrants on Reasonable Suspicion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Nothing; Prima facie; Probable cause; Law; Order (exchange); Reasonable suspicion; Jurisprudence; Reasonable doubt; Section (typography); Expectation of privacy; Political science; Supreme court; Business; Philosophy; Advertising","score_opus":0.042710408069387015,"score_gpt":0.3357256185661975,"score_spread":0.29301521049681045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341790205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65830374,0.0021245051,0.007894116,0.2014182,0.004205503,0.0048222803,0.00007879776,0.0017374939,0.119415365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654413,0.00005078543,0.016419347,0.0058965287,0.002535035,0.000114373586,0.00000928663,0.000054299573,0.00947907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677485,0.00021720266,0.00045227606,0.0006310698,0.0009302965,0.0009943222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980829,0.00071652903,0.00019484737,0.00039384255,0.00021004226,0.0004018472],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027794822,0.00027506257,0.00037854238,0.00009154102,0.0020484803,0.00048666834,0.0006298553,0.00027643036,0.000343363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016395772,0.00026558837,0.00020645771,0.00027602442,0.00025290684,0.001439212,0.000090273315,0.0005204294,0.0005477619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044835825,0.0001923043,0.00018758784,0.00016512051,0.00004027029,0.000024016277,0.056923103,0.00077694433,0.0027658837,0.9161502,0.010472875,0.011853347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009628927,0.0002306384,0.0000677282,0.00047795114,0.000053394324,0.000004182624,0.0045560463,0.000982455,0.0036940712,0.008414217,0.9799905,0.0005659222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01282063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012667296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96951765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062817446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006441361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341940334","doi":"","title":"The Rise and Fall of Duress (or How Duress Changed Necessity Before Being Excluded by Self-Defence)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Supreme court; Law; Self defense; Principal (computer security); Statutory law; Action (physics); Political science; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.017670128510339046,"score_gpt":0.2742180158787014,"score_spread":0.25654788736836237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341940334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771812,0.001871415,0.000014208079,0.014996667,0.0002782564,0.00055315904,0.000015314112,0.00011627415,0.0049735014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415183,0.0006245505,0.00022874365,0.00022805075,0.00027929174,0.00006426557,0.000002028796,0.00001552283,0.0044057393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979428,0.0003164688,0.0002411931,0.00034369712,0.0005997763,0.00055608107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985946,0.0003322123,0.00019527432,0.000346825,0.00019653102,0.00033458314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093846343,0.00018804705,0.00027320266,0.000024714649,0.0015911064,0.0005013791,0.00064809655,0.00015709756,0.00015228699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042039115,0.00012707191,0.000076814766,0.00021822238,0.00072336063,0.0008269047,0.00017228449,0.0002672222,0.000040718096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055536523,0.0007984664,0.19593574,0.0012115063,0.00042078472,0.000089505425,0.10808835,0.0000039804927,0.007226295,0.47214592,0.18374373,0.02978037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014649932,0.00042398667,0.06143438,0.00056463847,0.00022059148,0.000013035408,0.024245761,0.00016183799,0.0033208171,0.027450733,0.8796139,0.0010853241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030434486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084003165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69587016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062184765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009446616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343070288","doi":"","title":"Protecting Reasonable Expectations: Mapping the Trajectory of the Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Legislature; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Honesty; Incentive; Political science; Law; Legal doctrine; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08579485785569538,"score_gpt":0.3044174413324854,"score_spread":0.21862258347679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343070288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3172959,0.00039015326,0.0012909068,0.05970212,0.00035560742,0.0007682077,0.0000013896221,0.000091631315,0.6201041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99319625,0.0000074269274,0.00016657072,0.00011569037,0.000078653655,0.00002339861,1.0678618e-8,0.0000021361284,0.0064098365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993554,0.0001739854,0.000087621556,0.00007073767,0.0001917354,0.00012056417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993115,0.00044287415,0.000050514805,0.00012760406,0.000050987062,0.000016500426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006177735,0.000030241341,0.000040031326,0.000006296723,0.00082440814,0.000019807989,0.00022793928,0.000019824352,0.00017394175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051075575,0.00001167127,0.000042152602,0.00013224031,0.00030672553,0.00013656628,0.000025312702,0.000042694828,0.000015320265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048169104,0.000015130725,0.0010926411,0.000011616114,0.000007422923,2.5109202e-7,0.04894671,0.000001158138,0.008979251,0.92887354,0.0013379819,0.0107294815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025445686,0.00003867667,0.00871749,0.0006066488,0.000026604648,0.0000030205226,0.500556,0.000013240363,0.029352983,0.03443329,0.4257427,0.00025491245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070059365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007383929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89444023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000288255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006395884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344462979","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1351","title":"Book Review: Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy, by David R. Boyd","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Environmental law","score_opus":0.01375388791006874,"score_gpt":0.28442814922294446,"score_spread":0.2706742613128757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344462979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029738585,0.26150385,0.0000034399536,0.124430105,0.00020984281,0.00018971544,0.0000388581,0.000030523755,0.6132963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8375585,0.050262,0.0002506932,0.10650194,0.0009788489,0.000003325411,0.000009526787,0.000020390626,0.0044147754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978417,0.00024322516,0.0003382327,0.00025934487,0.0005885528,0.0007289415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869037,0.000068051566,0.00014903846,0.00017223475,0.000029409772,0.0008908897],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009989837,0.0001928882,0.000247686,0.000046417645,0.0028260306,0.000345769,0.00039656882,0.00015239776,0.0012009307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004490425,0.00018182109,0.00010831109,0.0000857365,0.00070338463,0.0010979866,0.00005779168,0.00064097095,0.00008760466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008198642,0.000022682065,0.000043447373,0.00003224519,0.000018381717,0.00005581694,0.0019945318,0.0000014273272,0.00013241393,0.7936746,0.20202842,0.0019878156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015627057,0.000035654757,0.000023760711,0.00040251575,0.00004256116,0.00022312299,0.00022981522,0.000004233764,0.00007927913,0.0077115735,0.990864,0.00022722305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83151346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95926225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83726114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006440816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019435848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344548867","doi":"","title":"John Gardner's Transatlantic Shadow","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Shadow (psychology); Criminal law; Law; Criminal responsibility; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.02783539033050048,"score_gpt":0.30017488881613313,"score_spread":0.27233949848563266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344548867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122159466,0.000073646675,0.0005411722,0.032729086,0.0003243067,0.00018370248,3.534808e-7,0.00014424966,0.843844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795457,0.00006465461,0.00031199653,0.00046244863,0.00017085411,0.000009333518,3.6526976e-7,0.000003176907,0.019431451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.000040664985,0.00007698376,0.00010454872,0.00019782179,0.00022138226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996663,0.00008406037,0.000011439995,0.000082767605,0.000043230204,0.000112215246],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017500206,0.0000451086,0.0000633381,0.00001690431,0.00021331341,0.000098280616,0.0001613453,0.000038189548,0.011239649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006033543,0.000035915356,0.000041663436,0.0000831414,0.00011626423,0.0002494792,0.000007346511,0.000045494486,0.0024064865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008045489,0.00010643189,0.00910067,0.00003086235,0.000018793524,0.000012530898,0.017933078,0.0000040985014,0.0013476806,0.4687549,0.43972087,0.06296207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107654254,0.00003387087,0.013755571,0.000022353217,0.000016167683,0.0000017364307,0.0059447763,0.000066879584,0.00022114595,0.008759476,0.97085804,0.0002123497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041169196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070899925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85738623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016709477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040468844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345743899","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06726659079461812,"score_gpt":0.3286751651652943,"score_spread":0.2614085743706762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345743899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97041434,0.00004737683,0.000017658984,0.023023967,0.00005373234,0.00015418515,0.0000066145076,0.000012067677,0.0062700827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992699,0.000096537966,0.000020432451,0.0004329935,0.00005203979,0.0000034122215,0.0000025276925,0.0000020846664,0.1001201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909836,0.00018106811,0.00012634968,0.00013077086,0.00020629897,0.00025714166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887794,0.0008413811,0.000035935096,0.000075166376,0.000032381722,0.00013720918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046555538,0.00007126218,0.0001385981,0.000027226077,0.00019670028,0.00003565145,0.00012826936,0.00002910553,0.00061240204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009263789,0.000035622277,0.000012878487,0.00015152522,0.0003051723,0.00009556495,0.000040722556,0.000058166224,0.000019965699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001009296,0.00002525186,0.21164586,0.000008359417,0.00005269933,0.00006158455,0.28011027,0.00008321406,0.000083914114,0.10799865,0.3953204,0.0036005236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022380464,0.000026508842,0.013936422,0.000055476405,0.000011974545,0.0000022190438,0.014243316,0.00005826928,0.00008596527,0.004188538,0.96499574,0.00015751364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016557536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027421996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6705373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346317093","doi":"","title":"Rational Connections: Oakes, Section 1 and the Charter's Legal Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Deference; Scholarship; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011115316061070753,"score_gpt":0.269419501294481,"score_spread":0.25830418523341026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346317093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6317288,0.006962212,0.025032971,0.2955036,0.003276556,0.0006162561,0.0000052755727,0.00014123858,0.03673309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861651,0.0028861011,0.000008214914,0.000105808824,0.0015624288,0.0000069997895,2.5596387e-7,0.0000037436694,0.009261323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984687,0.00024719542,0.00013765335,0.00011221657,0.00026305506,0.0007712061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994658,0.00024718852,0.000079515834,0.000059339152,0.00008785943,0.000060280116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025489675,0.0000647407,0.00007936916,0.000036663776,0.0016556246,0.00013038385,0.00012609788,0.000045859135,0.00013622147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015331383,0.000032905227,0.00005574557,0.00008249252,0.00035559645,0.00051919965,0.000010325018,0.00041325114,0.000027386197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006810125,0.000007942692,0.00012177277,4.1914285e-7,0.000023486158,6.6495744e-7,0.0005072145,3.3211438e-7,0.00008953243,0.9926582,0.0005721816,0.0059501617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085018843,0.000087322165,0.00034540187,0.000020835827,0.000028388853,0.00032483845,0.002302984,0.000006748142,0.000025444551,0.6234157,0.372505,0.000087111446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002073409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04510819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37193283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039815644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000902588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2349069524","doi":"","title":"Study on Several Issues of Administrative Violations of Law and Administrative Crime——A Comparative Study Between China and Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Forum of Nandu","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; China; Legislation; Administrative law; Harm; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Action (physics); Public administration","score_opus":0.21274400938976476,"score_gpt":0.4472309657058028,"score_spread":0.23448695631603803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2349069524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927733,0.00021617142,0.0000019424203,0.00077616744,0.000034706827,0.0006695926,0.000087301516,0.0000061559704,0.0054346626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969465,0.000058754595,0.0000308414,0.00002582192,0.0000347951,0.000009478444,0.0000025476336,0.0000041584713,0.00013892891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983929,0.00026388056,0.000443755,0.00022591441,0.00047952431,0.00019402805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882954,0.00052985456,0.000299709,0.00010809352,0.0001238715,0.00010891307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037422866,0.0001389581,0.00048187954,0.000041178468,0.00036857868,0.000005163373,0.00018290806,0.00008204936,0.000007467767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011905445,0.00012236502,0.000027073196,0.00013275628,0.0008090766,0.00020701627,0.000055370503,0.00024595097,2.0967124e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001634712,0.00029099634,0.772192,0.000016622733,0.00012336159,0.000008892969,0.20788586,0.0000020908403,0.00007219434,0.018454019,0.00072970404,0.000060795795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058955845,0.002928,0.73526764,0.00007334303,0.000087462424,0.0000020579964,0.25742212,0.000001984722,0.0022774881,0.0005777527,0.0006283841,0.00014423358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4935206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39608774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097432874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003665792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047905662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6149321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2350166895","doi":"","title":"The Development of Plea Bargaining in Other Countries and Its Teachings","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dangdai faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Phenomenon; Value (mathematics); Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03919997824790123,"score_gpt":0.3484357302492413,"score_spread":0.30923575200134007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2350166895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96795917,0.00066597556,0.00013337158,0.0007095555,0.00005900678,0.000085237254,0.0000010244005,0.000012056305,0.03037461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987789,0.000032802905,0.0004077793,0.00013887614,0.00003781829,0.0000022118556,2.3982352e-7,0.000003416092,0.00059800025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993353,0.000039013503,0.00015994858,0.00008152027,0.0001896562,0.00019459125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995194,0.00032391655,0.000044731885,0.000046252902,0.000028998484,0.00003670752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023461299,0.000044208962,0.00006616736,0.000026938209,0.00040600303,0.00003390473,0.00012155313,0.000033199194,0.000013152311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020685449,0.000032624113,0.000009613577,0.00008519455,0.00012362683,0.000103911276,0.000030006897,0.000068117566,0.000008036334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006955857,0.00002938338,0.074580595,0.00003116945,0.000013144456,0.0000066293237,0.37170425,0.000002114526,0.0008477266,0.51072073,0.000597482,0.041397236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012973386,0.000013660971,0.03624943,0.000085913365,0.0000039453316,6.225559e-7,0.037132785,0.0000104762785,0.0019123212,0.0010450071,0.92330414,0.000111969195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014037086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029174834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92270666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038620772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008862171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2354175897","doi":"","title":"The Development and the Problems of Sino-Canadian Criminal Judicial Assistance System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Minjiang University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Affection; Criminal procedure; Psychology","score_opus":0.02979729047327221,"score_gpt":0.24296156598229457,"score_spread":0.21316427550902237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2354175897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95723313,0.0017658543,0.00015887676,0.004957156,0.00052440475,0.00012865358,0.0000020719247,0.000004253331,0.03522558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895614,0.00008424881,0.00025081463,0.000018012748,0.00014105104,6.13937e-8,4.9832387e-8,0.0000015820408,0.0005480495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991265,0.00019592678,0.0001546054,0.000038817383,0.00028132033,0.00020284865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912757,0.00023488763,0.00023816546,0.00005510977,0.00017056483,0.00017369112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002201953,0.000045036522,0.0001138818,0.000042761865,0.001032599,0.000026874204,0.00026497812,0.000035511275,0.000006330819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000977262,0.000027854408,0.000050515704,0.00010910473,0.0004637461,0.00022835599,0.00002386382,0.00010699682,0.000002240838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009466168,0.000081128506,0.036631323,0.00018346656,0.00020384471,0.00007069159,0.23625885,0.000010709019,0.00007812298,0.6878366,0.008223411,0.029475244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054605136,0.000035257053,0.055500023,0.00025174956,0.00017222756,0.00003202997,0.19641222,0.0000055255036,0.00007010486,0.00010051868,0.7467745,0.000099815996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013251961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113434836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7385511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028971213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005016173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99331886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359822578","doi":"","title":"Comparison on application of tempering justice with mercy in arrest censorship between countries(regions) of Anglo-American law system and our country","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Tempering","score_opus":0.035783856486190785,"score_gpt":0.3096061267926808,"score_spread":0.27382227030649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359822578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959112,0.00027002738,0.0028578972,0.0001532332,0.00015289347,0.000105531435,0.0000055502455,0.000010216537,0.00053345395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980429,0.0001350872,0.001641409,0.000005226815,0.00016270019,0.000001530876,6.6651313e-7,0.000008117725,0.000002372537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988034,0.000026227583,0.0005164074,0.00008903415,0.0004158043,0.00014915761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990085,0.000121337755,0.00051245996,0.000097550335,0.00017796789,0.00008221138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050364085,0.0000990927,0.00045601244,0.00014816485,0.000081822436,0.000009279695,0.0001709512,0.00004794116,2.550683e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093875184,0.00008926296,0.0000356898,0.0003122065,0.00025269206,0.0003096407,0.000013694489,0.0001702024,2.2279833e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006855638,0.00028734282,0.4297527,0.005188961,0.00025533565,0.00013885842,0.021716638,0.2433598,0.008615739,0.28898147,0.00010227021,0.0009153184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051581636,0.0032880777,0.7502248,0.026310874,0.0017758325,0.000380004,0.10652221,0.008481088,0.02398556,0.00006214336,0.071869664,0.0019415652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026581106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042142396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32047212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011841199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010032501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4018286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2360878871","doi":"","title":"Legal Application of Evidences for \"Drug Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Commit; Engineering ethics; Drug; Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.06359993828934064,"score_gpt":0.38918085595921015,"score_spread":0.3255809176698695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2360878871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44178057,0.0015667052,0.030249655,0.012240467,0.0005515822,0.0015068115,0.000009745651,0.00014551306,0.51194894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401593,0.000035396828,0.0017752919,0.000066821696,0.000047359386,0.000028692246,3.8018396e-7,0.0000017305729,0.004028384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953187,0.000040218332,0.00009721162,0.00008978117,0.00013658768,0.000104321065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938023,0.00039315617,0.00004042492,0.000067508605,0.00008371147,0.00003496688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005150442,0.000030759842,0.000060928836,0.000014277316,0.00016303797,0.000019619127,0.00009345856,0.000018552482,0.00009897057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054948026,0.00002612062,0.000036341164,0.000088140536,0.0001135401,0.00019474454,0.0000038372496,0.000014319346,0.000010506373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056774165,0.000014857823,0.0020556499,0.000014634302,0.0000015275517,2.4635466e-7,0.00072034437,0.000002400473,0.00015223313,0.9898388,0.003936289,0.0032573605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049282397,0.000031339798,0.00017990368,0.000012348716,0.000013749687,0.0000014005012,0.006856106,0.000024185207,0.0050778463,0.008452086,0.97923315,0.0000685835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011065093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01303903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013577314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008343081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361027757","doi":"","title":"The Research of In - Custody Informers in Prevention of Miscarriages of Justice of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; False accusation; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0457054966009129,"score_gpt":0.39726469932327657,"score_spread":0.3515592027223637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361027757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702119,0.000059859718,0.0000011948499,0.0025270774,0.00016728314,0.00013095846,0.000003886073,7.439577e-7,0.026897069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890363,0.00003067555,0.000027885904,0.0000045520246,0.000012360535,0.0000028641728,3.4315588e-7,0.0000015339934,0.0010161526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.00009760985,0.0002733009,0.000052380637,0.00046495092,0.00020941532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992077,0.0004136254,0.00010526729,0.000106367464,0.00014110118,0.000025984275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019551094,0.0000286268,0.00010348257,0.000057942147,0.00007552197,0.0000046994596,0.00024388875,0.00004275344,0.000020911682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010309344,0.000022448636,0.000025190486,0.0003159026,0.00037023597,0.00013404372,0.00003875399,0.00016646384,1.599871e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033387533,0.00015023327,0.05910761,0.00057055696,0.00001472381,0.0000039241777,0.014753297,0.0001262825,0.018878033,0.8840891,0.005553302,0.016419047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009794062,0.0007437119,0.26274264,0.0010386739,0.00006424786,0.000001525622,0.38722056,0.00018957088,0.109809704,0.02550268,0.21138401,0.0003232794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8871615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85858643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034992147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091501226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16231924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361061843","doi":"","title":"On the Emergency Monitoring from the Perspective of Discretionary Power","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Beifang faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Legislation; Statutory law; Perspective (graphical); Law; Control (management); Business; Power (physics); Criminal law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0418418218616751,"score_gpt":0.35529399488322877,"score_spread":0.31345217302155365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361061843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8135682,0.0008983048,0.000052916406,0.072522745,0.0005618389,0.00015431235,0.000011722602,0.000025659012,0.11220435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862397,0.00010691331,0.000034033856,0.00013571129,0.00033720443,0.0000034883456,5.361084e-7,0.0000026567282,0.0007554774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992824,0.00010889842,0.000087954315,0.00011021995,0.00028569935,0.00012478413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993671,0.0003283844,0.000043516997,0.00016473416,0.00006883404,0.000027435875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027007368,0.000053076314,0.000057256133,0.0000086197415,0.00044632168,0.000017285482,0.00027882267,0.000030025272,0.00039478383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035981555,0.000029283667,0.00006502481,0.00012633349,0.00011710207,0.00008705506,0.000017112176,0.0000956772,0.00004051507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020709822,0.00003787799,0.00402756,4.2120598e-7,0.000009573485,0.0000017323639,0.031807657,0.0000057235125,0.0005292263,0.95659006,0.0061888825,0.0007805563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007953724,0.00013946048,0.49527407,0.00011109196,0.00003594785,3.1582363e-7,0.13208331,0.0000056907716,0.00062112,0.3448319,0.02664439,0.0001731359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006467931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002916607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6117582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000463823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031804393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.977762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361486098","doi":"","title":"On Sino-Canadian Criminal Judicial Assistance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Minjiang University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Multinational corporation; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.036447800006605593,"score_gpt":0.2846593504511692,"score_spread":0.2482115504445636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361486098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420815,0.00018145057,0.00012828762,0.004739958,0.0009915037,0.000040529198,0.0000054162347,0.000007734308,0.15182364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966375,0.000043945573,0.000271767,0.00023919094,0.0005900523,1.1593124e-8,1.9569305e-7,0.0000028913437,0.0022144495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990635,0.00012515008,0.00009910629,0.000057139714,0.00033716354,0.0003179683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990238,0.0001201757,0.00013604431,0.00006478785,0.00014874528,0.0005064475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007061916,0.0000583946,0.00011364082,0.00014989804,0.00051124126,0.000022474602,0.0002615206,0.00006741767,0.00036095982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019648447,0.0000606104,0.00009757515,0.00016493577,0.00015027777,0.0005289299,0.000011775152,0.00018084416,0.000068480236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000969446,0.00044075045,0.043370362,0.000030453995,0.00010357228,0.0011871052,0.04941813,0.000022868107,0.00030342498,0.61540407,0.26397124,0.024778565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022965076,0.00012147698,0.05132576,0.00007604235,0.00010394605,0.000019289235,0.01806106,0.0000010499281,0.000050660266,0.00041200264,0.92946446,0.00013457293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0213372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06690321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66549325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000580576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046153236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236336940","doi":"","title":"Issue Estoppel and Similar Facts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Acquittal; Rules of evidence; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07970209412214053,"score_gpt":0.3947720567397317,"score_spread":0.3150699626175912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W236336940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82089084,0.0005907816,0.000036378104,0.033646084,0.00015564679,0.00007590988,4.3643294e-7,0.0000652032,0.14453875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96471405,0.0005193948,0.0003295281,0.00036402186,0.00015138382,0.0000012963066,2.2767834e-7,0.0000033658139,0.033916727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995023,0.00003362934,0.000040485458,0.00010371175,0.00015626376,0.00016363802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997185,0.000064083775,0.000016028158,0.00007448474,0.000023695015,0.00010323441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012829983,0.000044449862,0.0000632939,0.0000134190805,0.0004040812,0.00001905368,0.00007595562,0.000028783072,0.00036923203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013461696,0.000042274358,0.000014804313,0.000066578614,0.00021386384,0.00010218742,0.000021612883,0.000048201313,0.00020395935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044544075,0.00008912351,0.03437193,0.000053465592,0.000016030222,0.00024620735,0.5920048,0.00001418967,0.0017928865,0.0491582,0.30670848,0.0155001525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052265063,0.000017162647,0.0073816553,0.000009610658,0.0000046123378,0.0000055070027,0.009915069,0.000005259543,0.00027978505,0.00033896143,0.9819101,0.00008002631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058630737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013217209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6752016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016342696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046544916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8863253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364787803","doi":"","title":"Comparative Research Upon the Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence Between Canada and Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebei University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Exclusionary rule; Empirical evidence; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.18211674404804468,"score_gpt":0.39598480996829716,"score_spread":0.21386806592025248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2364787803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99093944,0.00025502234,0.00001357633,0.006358736,0.000066353205,0.000065872126,0.000005793621,0.0000016825285,0.0022935227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972462,0.00009764081,0.000099227815,0.00001028507,0.00014160098,2.1187715e-8,2.3290983e-7,0.000001174725,0.0024036053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830717,0.0005259928,0.00016347303,0.00007579284,0.0007498477,0.00017772625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980069,0.0010673259,0.00018017093,0.00007422919,0.0005755523,0.00009583587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017312663,0.00004963853,0.00017034638,0.0000672396,0.00071667176,0.000019673864,0.00038475933,0.00003743466,0.000055790097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014486592,0.00003772663,0.00004204017,0.00027142518,0.00043070424,0.0003691268,0.000096845535,0.0002614678,9.623014e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014107744,0.00019929952,0.6258121,0.000124896,0.00018039631,0.0010374612,0.031005165,0.00044375574,0.0033830306,0.051196538,0.28391823,0.0012883407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002718377,0.00020193568,0.8137385,0.00026342596,0.0000753855,0.0000125586275,0.035949968,0.000007881867,0.0003704169,0.0016711822,0.1473216,0.000115307244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85608625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83296984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1879264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030010188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010826556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5512132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2366159395","doi":"","title":"Rules of Hearsay Evidence in Canadian Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebei Polytechnic College","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.048778789317707946,"score_gpt":0.35690962962606,"score_spread":0.308130840308352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2366159395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514491,0.0050901473,0.0000804683,0.010657918,0.0005436742,0.0002550356,0.000015101555,0.0000150555925,0.031893477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981255,0.00036452885,0.00069664995,0.00027015162,0.00017389267,7.335428e-7,8.5033356e-8,0.00000682689,0.00036164554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979999,0.000102768536,0.0006854459,0.00010240898,0.00059816486,0.0005112758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842143,0.00051929324,0.0002940361,0.00015143285,0.00021775915,0.0003960648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054228646,0.00009043167,0.00028908017,0.00040202157,0.00018291817,0.000020732445,0.00048570448,0.00012796631,0.00015046082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006410551,0.00008448706,0.00012743348,0.00049660273,0.00032351154,0.00043986132,0.00002741215,0.00028927356,0.00000901059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039381094,0.00017908009,0.035163958,0.00008390306,0.000031504653,0.0013083,0.0059162946,0.00001972625,0.004061202,0.93399864,0.011544345,0.007299228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093804137,0.00091566955,0.12963778,0.0034826875,0.000103362196,0.00036830682,0.012748748,0.000018197288,0.006336822,0.019880392,0.8249354,0.0006346263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6221723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93647385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91411823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006074937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3803437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372037830","doi":"","title":"Protection of Credit Rating Agencies under the First Amendment:From the Perspective of Judicial Precedents","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credit rating; Agency (philosophy); Malice; Business; Liability; Consumer Protection Act; Credit reference; Law; Economics; Actuarial science; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Credit risk; Sociology","score_opus":0.18244977531919718,"score_gpt":0.4357700157728696,"score_spread":0.2533202404536724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372037830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87682855,0.00013029775,0.00045787566,0.09607819,0.00059269957,0.0007425602,0.000014814174,0.000011476731,0.025143566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860007,0.000077515586,0.000024993207,0.00003998926,0.0006074315,0.00009310234,0.0000019205752,0.000004218417,0.00055077433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979173,0.00020420058,0.00017529255,0.00013910973,0.0013994557,0.00016466386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962119,0.0007703626,0.000102763406,0.00012629532,0.0027676914,0.000021008627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010705383,0.000049765342,0.000071262395,0.00005885138,0.00058004947,0.00013102828,0.0006766286,0.00003740356,0.00083267054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017210302,0.000030463005,0.0000366458,0.00044195814,0.0008182441,0.00031932446,0.00016357642,0.00017101796,0.00003668543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008139592,0.0009194596,0.055653144,0.00014165245,0.000745467,0.000006919532,0.26741806,0.0023136653,0.06602819,0.53751546,0.053011872,0.015432115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032063617,0.00007964907,0.6614446,0.0003986507,0.000019416259,0.0000013642177,0.22035764,0.0005097709,0.0056085503,0.09429329,0.016815793,0.00015066702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21981731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012622646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60579145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025617058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021693096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91171587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2375055342","doi":"","title":"On Construction of Antisuit Injunction in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Yangtze University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; China; Construct (python library); Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02073543483180496,"score_gpt":0.25350796572852535,"score_spread":0.2327725308967204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2375055342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98490375,0.000015062721,0.00010751067,0.0005442315,0.00023203624,0.000022085174,7.502561e-7,0.0000028608756,0.014171702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999056,0.00029639975,0.0002502424,0.000008560181,0.00004661065,3.365864e-9,8.3499614e-8,9.3583117e-7,0.00034120548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994927,0.000083088205,0.00010256587,0.000040188348,0.00021392076,0.00006751402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961007,0.000050211624,0.000175819,0.000033533408,0.00008946821,0.000040903768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002774784,0.000028896644,0.00009556056,0.0001504523,0.00013643505,0.0000026895593,0.00009500267,0.000038545233,0.00007910815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010078038,0.000029285273,0.000052381383,0.00020860689,0.00019275541,0.00029143866,0.000009317391,0.00011044009,0.0000028353938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002949232,0.00079693506,0.5603225,0.000057256617,0.00007706915,0.0013489529,0.042097867,0.0005614258,0.0035390547,0.348707,0.011079727,0.028462948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014949342,0.00085533765,0.9014468,0.0002826214,0.000055791395,0.00018624944,0.018962104,0.000017689337,0.0011783672,0.004455332,0.07087492,0.00018980655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016537643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005704513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34425166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013437311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119083066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25000077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2379713756","doi":"","title":"Plea Bargaining: the Choice from the Effectiveness of Lawsuit and the Justice of Lawsuit","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of North China Electric Power University","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Lawsuit; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008868414887946425,"score_gpt":0.2439900598089934,"score_spread":0.23512164492104698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2379713756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910094,0.0003732016,0.000101850404,0.0016297584,0.00024843117,0.00014728923,0.000006766619,0.0000035432613,0.006479727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933445,0.00036273815,0.00001837624,0.000060047914,0.00012966663,9.2311566e-8,2.5701814e-7,0.000003668298,0.0000906748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981011,0.00095836574,0.00019458194,0.00009979003,0.00045790477,0.00018827153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228144,0.0067272,0.0004693757,0.00018894294,0.00025845924,0.000074600845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029912265,0.00009169449,0.0002526836,0.000045687535,0.00070005504,0.000027583988,0.0008786423,0.00005657613,0.000042224434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016725302,0.00004785209,0.00014292535,0.00048980553,0.00069943833,0.000266813,0.000087872606,0.00060067,8.8728376e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075936,0.0004927148,0.69570196,0.00012209165,0.0008184132,0.00007718733,0.049138222,0.00014084487,0.0035540322,0.23176132,0.002851717,0.0077478928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088439946,0.00014078079,0.97909856,0.000041850326,0.0005433595,0.000010829381,0.0016505332,0.00002485671,0.00016204886,0.001255607,0.016111262,0.000075910495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008888011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073758294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2833966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043251603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027587567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2380701235","doi":"","title":"Basic Legal Principles of the Admissibility of Video Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Xiandai faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admissible evidence; Law; China; Video recording; Computer science; Political science; Multimedia","score_opus":0.09186361653498636,"score_gpt":0.36002540162873875,"score_spread":0.2681617850937524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2380701235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96065694,0.0008112812,0.00005561432,0.011757018,0.0001956403,0.00022824341,0.00000808954,0.000020919373,0.02626623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949866,0.00009439363,0.00033444553,0.00013031378,0.00016196076,0.0000043675486,1.5240457e-7,0.0000040428145,0.0042837188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985715,0.0002073437,0.0003154827,0.00018679306,0.00051218335,0.00020669741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988424,0.00036154108,0.00017171094,0.00037981567,0.0001549985,0.000089502966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013226565,0.00007769925,0.00017213845,0.000021540229,0.00022628011,0.000025066984,0.0005362555,0.00006243463,0.00034601858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020794647,0.000054466356,0.00013357747,0.00025122915,0.00055617414,0.0004154874,0.00009628637,0.000107293185,0.000016156451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045994166,0.0006700904,0.3183891,0.00068460096,0.000067594745,0.0000059616727,0.04778319,0.00052581663,0.027575636,0.50843257,0.010762952,0.08464257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018768926,0.00007948365,0.14170255,0.00066627,0.000054462693,0.0000021509325,0.0016978498,0.00008439601,0.03403904,0.00083869323,0.8204599,0.00018752698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042642984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076282737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8096969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069454894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004687928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64463717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2380827553","doi":"","title":"Quarter Division of Acts Reflection of the Mode of the Constitution of Crime in China","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dangdai faxue","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; China; Perspective (graphical); Law; Position (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Division (mathematics); Reflection (computer programming); Mode (computer interface); Sociology; Law and economics; Criminology; History; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.02588039589658718,"score_gpt":0.3551836976815033,"score_spread":0.3293033017849161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2380827553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775601,0.000037991093,0.00010126346,0.0010625899,0.0001425952,0.00013836821,0.0000063873163,0.0000033635956,0.020947335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998503,0.000014050104,0.000033998273,0.000023996205,0.000015749545,7.259957e-7,4.4510685e-7,9.778818e-7,0.00005979982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922574,0.00013615935,0.00021255789,0.00007238208,0.00026861497,0.000084550564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995257,0.000046295707,0.00018247824,0.00016849766,0.000063646476,0.000013354888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029174724,0.000041951487,0.00011759661,0.000031136886,0.000077288874,0.0000034094953,0.0002022194,0.000050178583,0.000008182917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001874488,0.000025595775,0.00006716039,0.00027834132,0.00032011038,0.00011934271,0.000021220287,0.00006635293,4.785754e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001663669,0.0004916163,0.03696313,0.00014224632,0.00001348795,5.7725134e-7,0.0554582,0.0009998037,0.41669568,0.47922057,0.0011804629,0.008667858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030548172,0.000192887,0.73099625,0.0006004058,0.00003549744,7.733927e-7,0.0024543898,0.00019255329,0.24974598,0.013138308,0.0022424767,0.0000949805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008507223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002470005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69403315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029290504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008948069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2384357643","doi":"","title":"Tipping the Scales in the Reasonableness-Proportionality Debate in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Law; Administrative law; Political science","score_opus":0.04149552550877914,"score_gpt":0.34451116525193876,"score_spread":0.3030156397431596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2384357643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7900178,0.0014573731,0.00006143617,0.18754694,0.00013694368,0.00022396269,0.0000048625507,0.000008080396,0.020542618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706256,0.0019112808,0.0000024839906,0.00053679786,0.0001725525,0.000010190411,4.9554336e-7,0.0000038702,0.00029975415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708915,0.00054489006,0.00020904774,0.00012784758,0.00034593738,0.0016831498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931926,0.0003410639,0.00008006023,0.000106580585,0.000060645158,0.00009236538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008506679,0.00007509813,0.00009277044,0.000050728533,0.00079017546,0.000093594674,0.0004815192,0.000051753148,0.000042738964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036384913,0.00003613298,0.000048109916,0.0002760729,0.00034843487,0.00029643395,0.000010906875,0.0006336896,0.000012963369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139309095,0.000011716294,0.0143793905,7.3830637e-7,0.000007452879,0.000014032255,0.00213266,0.0000014672302,0.000013748449,0.9787744,0.000041757066,0.004608693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020189259,0.000065771914,0.07442975,0.000107687316,0.00001420461,0.000103487335,0.034098424,0.000005408776,0.000010173841,0.82148576,0.06933231,0.00014510551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61041534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38840306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001850287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070418427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387574630","doi":"","title":"The Age Divide of Criminal Responsibility in Criminal Law --The Study of the 17th Clause of the Criminal Law of 97 Version","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Legislation; Criminal responsibility; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminal procedure; Geography","score_opus":0.09621401664060643,"score_gpt":0.3429144618812104,"score_spread":0.24670044524060397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387574630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699798,0.00018355798,0.000004378548,0.002119381,0.00024329238,0.00078643765,0.000010943656,0.0000094117895,0.026662763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984841,0.00004394373,0.000029569328,0.00020469159,0.000046450346,0.000011286308,2.2658634e-7,0.000009006581,0.0011707786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948162,0.0020593922,0.00087883533,0.00032825058,0.0015106985,0.00040663313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957091,0.0022428338,0.00048786702,0.0011789901,0.00032199992,0.00005916207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041277027,0.0001935375,0.00039420943,0.00004095272,0.0009351547,0.000037797457,0.0018800297,0.00010587642,0.00023500678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001141835,0.00008946818,0.00027722502,0.000567477,0.0039056893,0.00022443346,0.0005073443,0.0003612435,0.000005245214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028443658,0.004323739,0.0438969,0.0005176063,0.000116037205,0.00001862787,0.3593416,0.00013525935,0.006426343,0.5744664,0.0034396555,0.004473479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020876748,0.0021474725,0.39644954,0.00069723144,0.0013717326,0.000007658503,0.54668343,0.0001370629,0.02871963,0.009275962,0.011914625,0.00050798315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0825198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15895246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56519043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000930215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013564831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2390171878","doi":"","title":"On the judicial applicability of the eliminating rules to the illegal evidence","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Forum","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; China; Kingdom; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.047435678838248375,"score_gpt":0.33656991075490467,"score_spread":0.28913423191665627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2390171878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64095527,0.0001008273,0.00009460305,0.3142518,0.00039913593,0.0005554124,0.000004368343,0.00002454035,0.043614022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954284,0.000019806997,0.000026768557,0.0031858517,0.00030114525,0.00004064896,1.184375e-7,0.00000552247,0.0009917761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982425,0.00028871305,0.0002047838,0.00020524127,0.00067960593,0.00037915647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979216,0.0013812796,0.00009025105,0.0004535603,0.00009441856,0.0000588762],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017929255,0.00009526383,0.000113510185,0.000013204198,0.0014758329,0.00009752659,0.0010496199,0.000050063518,0.00012987375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002835371,0.000044022538,0.00012878297,0.0003591293,0.0005171404,0.00018038745,0.00019973492,0.00023202742,0.00008438846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007930202,0.000040515315,0.0029348787,0.0000066756265,0.0000057110956,0.0000013795743,0.005724893,0.000059633752,0.00019015276,0.9616051,0.013825871,0.015525923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083216844,0.00020118666,0.029150937,0.00032626075,0.00004259557,0.0000045382258,0.021387547,0.00011410652,0.001121169,0.0310109,0.91632056,0.00023696307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010913128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017118799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93059415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006961208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011757783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392576107","doi":"","title":"Research on Canadian Sentencing System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Henan Police College","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggravating Factor; Legislation; Sentence; Political science; Law; Sentencing guidelines; Common law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.15006576821150128,"score_gpt":0.43651966890222793,"score_spread":0.2864539006907266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392576107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7840328,0.00039033865,0.0000028695172,0.01192934,0.0011785111,0.00014137405,0.000012888676,0.000011175062,0.20230065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956761,0.00003818481,0.00006444902,0.00026427515,0.0023610306,0.0000014387331,8.0342865e-8,0.000008158378,0.0015862739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997493,0.00048739367,0.0002722256,0.00006744736,0.0008905373,0.000789374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979524,0.00038522333,0.0001213537,0.000119093944,0.00043710857,0.000984839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052376767,0.00006696934,0.00016136633,0.00045396062,0.000941914,0.000055918186,0.00035599052,0.000077513425,0.000064636784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024696894,0.000054734886,0.000083000836,0.0005181443,0.00013351216,0.0003912084,0.000020940759,0.0003810429,0.00014469863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011411406,0.00010926878,0.0084999865,0.00009391896,0.000044384073,0.00018609149,0.060331807,0.000022145869,0.00021195885,0.62599933,0.303227,0.0011599833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018725253,0.00016812448,0.005879852,0.000475952,0.000019880756,0.0001547334,0.31559762,0.000006122957,0.00013957541,0.00010118845,0.6771454,0.00012425859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66862446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53311175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6258982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001469031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001386469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7244536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392784077","doi":"","title":"Mens Rea for Animal Cruelty Offences after R. v. Gerling: A Dog's Breakfast","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Cruelty; Criminology; Animal welfare; Law; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.049269329107928285,"score_gpt":0.3615896948593452,"score_spread":0.3123203657514169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392784077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.757819,0.00026357273,0.0044727274,0.066619135,0.0006839088,0.00069893163,0.000042320273,0.00028306732,0.16911733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981072,0.000059814647,0.0009246303,0.00032815142,0.00042984978,0.000060587332,3.700059e-7,0.000006818932,0.017117789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989005,0.000047896887,0.0001515641,0.0002513237,0.00026659304,0.00038217174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922657,0.00035283662,0.000043146374,0.00013014858,0.00010947282,0.00013781966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000528464,0.000090430665,0.00012140345,0.000026677028,0.00030463576,0.00007974636,0.00021552439,0.00007045101,0.001478883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021480843,0.000054315944,0.00009094544,0.00008435218,0.0002957589,0.00036432577,0.000036662346,0.000029247474,0.00013570866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009776853,0.00025663013,0.023653883,0.000091112954,0.000068224166,0.000050967476,0.022327505,2.6184347e-7,0.017022502,0.7164927,0.107367344,0.11169118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025900724,0.00019806586,0.006147615,0.00008187092,0.000028486023,0.000002836132,0.0026711181,0.0000062121876,0.0013497429,0.0058926702,0.9831106,0.00025178428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015390136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005415103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87574327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038818747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103706065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2396812244","doi":"","title":"Human rights issues and employee benefit plans.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statute; Human rights; Legislation; Legislature; Equity (law); Business; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058977305887395234,"score_gpt":0.3177346007931034,"score_spread":0.25875729490570815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2396812244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9151913,0.0003302642,0.000001209296,0.0035493628,0.00011423598,0.00018167774,0.000001833865,0.00006885443,0.080561265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810596,0.000076488555,0.000017560093,0.00009455331,0.00032853818,0.00009076487,9.060776e-7,0.0000035347775,0.01832803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999257,0.000026319747,0.000082627375,0.00014506189,0.00018853968,0.0003004442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969655,0.000032543718,0.000020808418,0.0000860871,0.000023727667,0.00014029493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030547124,0.00005608469,0.000081113154,0.000026477723,0.000613707,0.000093645016,0.00012965013,0.0000453493,0.00009274034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027668415,0.00004922217,0.00001993687,0.000078909296,0.0001512342,0.00019071647,0.000023202876,0.000046825407,0.000022676304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035050714,0.000083994804,0.39321882,0.000023023194,0.00003044867,0.00010225999,0.010552397,0.0000015629818,0.000015822063,0.44171605,0.032719504,0.12150106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051503917,0.0000055495616,0.46230438,0.000003557585,0.0000073138767,0.0000016115781,0.00013194067,1.2533738e-7,0.000019465893,0.014908689,0.5224993,0.00006653281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017367624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045833603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48977983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023044206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003929488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399915542","doi":"","title":"Comparative Reflections on Duncan v. Louisiana and Baldwin v. New York","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plea; Political science; Mistake; Jury; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1459965362001065,"score_gpt":0.3795157850505571,"score_spread":0.2335192488504506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399915542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13634539,0.0012611196,0.00011446465,0.016801912,0.0008479197,0.00033707352,0.000007198225,0.00019530019,0.8440896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800526,0.000029139374,0.0007322823,0.0012736664,0.0007288094,0.000008538772,0.0000025971021,0.000008512551,0.017163865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998634,0.00018766012,0.0001604638,0.0002909416,0.00040277198,0.00032415974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987873,0.00013369945,0.00005810921,0.00020562063,0.00008467573,0.00073058537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047413012,0.00012865191,0.00020111936,0.000038760318,0.00063814456,0.0002043542,0.00020733541,0.000088260145,0.00029395646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021074951,0.0001224742,0.000045191297,0.0002849046,0.00030765493,0.00029240566,0.00003701126,0.00022863086,0.00071327086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008343546,0.00005663329,0.0008272584,0.0000051650177,0.000019026147,0.000010863601,0.017806217,0.00004088736,0.000092767215,0.7376523,0.24268192,0.0007235292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027148653,0.0001773631,0.0010603062,0.00004968442,0.000021135555,0.000003032224,0.009845353,0.00000604835,0.00014442907,0.013896312,0.9743368,0.0001880293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057766903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14432405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8437072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015991021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003551512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9485075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402456381","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Law, Canadian: Articles - News","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3288104820208269,"score_gpt":0.4694332160104712,"score_spread":0.1406227339896443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402456381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016874977,0.00225884,0.0000013786108,0.055278324,0.0010508794,0.00027722583,0.000036428206,0.00008400554,0.9408442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03963099,0.001828254,0.0005589514,0.004495156,0.0051499344,0.000043640473,0.000046731617,0.000048308968,0.948198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588513,0.0005834579,0.00030486856,0.0004160797,0.0016351516,0.0011753163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967922,0.0005107822,0.00004888055,0.00044590273,0.0010193931,0.0011828176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004910909,0.00016517323,0.00027276063,0.0002652556,0.0012375459,0.0005542297,0.0010570496,0.000477778,0.004139414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017245999,0.00014840078,0.0000860622,0.0005534781,0.0011384686,0.00031042314,0.00012133652,0.00057815254,0.0028438289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023748337,0.0000053163426,0.00002577133,0.000014338775,0.000005783474,0.00003376731,0.0022249706,3.7568714e-7,4.865669e-7,0.223068,0.77198267,0.0026361719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033771044,0.000031454307,0.0000060231705,0.00009892244,0.00001241974,0.0000011350533,0.021269673,0.0000015074505,0.000006924775,0.024438966,0.9539051,0.00019410324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99729115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19862904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094209326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068775816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2402674181","doi":"","title":"Best Practices in Administrative Decision-Making: Viewing the Copyright Board of Canada in a Comparative Light","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Tariff; Process (computing); Economic Justice; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Best practice; Administrative law; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08165649802691646,"score_gpt":0.4064513355718958,"score_spread":0.3247948375449793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2402674181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94913405,0.0032306213,0.00026656795,0.027144263,0.00022857223,0.00023087772,0.000002158753,0.0000040345235,0.019758835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974751,0.0016940333,0.00003929239,0.00005596687,0.00010180179,0.000005107106,4.5073918e-8,0.000004080868,0.00062458415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733067,0.00043940078,0.0003793403,0.00015410548,0.00053154404,0.0011649646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997307,0.0018859481,0.0005182995,0.00010287518,0.00012438545,0.00006149891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002990832,0.0001010764,0.00022131753,0.000066306304,0.00033476343,0.00004628057,0.0004544278,0.000046298836,0.00007037731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001285014,0.000055626748,0.000045448713,0.0003373362,0.00015936368,0.00045526537,0.00002660705,0.0007151883,0.0000045007146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014861793,0.00047452835,0.04682137,0.000020903171,0.00019354929,0.00018958015,0.09380818,0.000047662168,0.00086061953,0.7898644,0.0038491695,0.06238384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001478975,0.0010314591,0.009105243,0.003045428,0.00008283715,0.00020020544,0.33841786,0.00003250772,0.00071518705,0.4013264,0.24392205,0.0006418812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21087654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99447995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7836034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017231246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0141057465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99148333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412098336","doi":"10.7202/1036483ar","title":"L’art de juger : sources et méthodologie. Ce que révèle l’œuvre du juge Louis LeBel","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03549583394563205,"score_gpt":0.2939813796759891,"score_spread":0.25848554573035704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412098336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7867827,0.004618172,0.023732446,0.1247641,0.0014603395,0.00027613228,0.000067619476,0.00022194296,0.058076564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6977398,0.004308263,0.0038141217,0.004357353,0.0010126431,0.00003146969,0.0000043450086,0.000046979087,0.28868502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615383,0.0010920168,0.00037768137,0.00059838814,0.0004708189,0.001307263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681747,0.0019639598,0.00020903046,0.00042050602,0.00010716829,0.00048188813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029879361,0.00033427338,0.00041540325,0.000083320774,0.00077026,0.00019847973,0.0008187358,0.0007883414,0.0016312165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016883217,0.0002941912,0.00029965767,0.00035507564,0.00279344,0.00056039006,0.000119420765,0.0004625774,0.001297704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008777424,0.00013959536,0.011787762,0.00012057688,0.00006925951,0.000186885,0.025471745,0.000031144555,0.0031132349,0.8253837,0.08613258,0.047475737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032442677,0.00014551496,0.0060990886,0.0003602461,0.00013856885,0.000074670854,0.0055112215,0.000035185098,0.0011618831,0.08707062,0.89853466,0.00054392475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006172718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045352606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81240207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016555241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061562273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413819913","doi":"","title":"Criminalization confusion and concerns: the decade since the Cuerrier decision.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Confusion; Supreme court; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.0635375325936003,"score_gpt":0.3279187207725473,"score_spread":0.264381188178947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413819913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5973625,0.008356917,0.005746928,0.30991122,0.0012136525,0.0029060615,0.0000057830675,0.00018433003,0.07431261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522954,0.0007184316,0.000034004697,0.002859852,0.00024358823,0.00006904773,5.2338663e-7,0.0000028810273,0.00084212446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990101,0.00013659563,0.000119709795,0.00014578123,0.0003399525,0.00024786018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917173,0.0004723225,0.000053628362,0.00015265489,0.00006512845,0.00008454423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010601019,0.0000633485,0.00006691739,0.000013837478,0.00094341085,0.00018030421,0.00027290068,0.00004780601,0.000029547487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008980411,0.000034063894,0.000026549522,0.00015416121,0.00036724945,0.00019590365,0.000033095228,0.000081391445,0.0000075255093],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044449465,0.000016357415,0.00097599317,0.0000024575506,0.0000034458733,0.0000029404189,0.011141628,0.0000081025455,0.000012762512,0.18781209,0.011618216,0.78836155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012861575,0.0000151537415,0.2676779,0.000017156734,0.000038002112,0.0000037579634,0.0047284374,0.00005150052,0.00007084928,0.022884812,0.70427775,0.000106033214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007214413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082096615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034450968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003547954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7256049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414053322","doi":"10.7202/1036487ar","title":"Spleen et idéal : les immunités juridictionnelles en droit canadien","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015804587456187985,"score_gpt":0.27048534295733123,"score_spread":0.2546807555011432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414053322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90469855,0.0042221216,0.0032942942,0.047951877,0.0013801913,0.00023105631,0.00018048499,0.00012522089,0.037916206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896521,0.0038829066,0.0003785601,0.00052862574,0.00066727854,0.0000208076,0.000009295872,0.000031282656,0.10482914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971179,0.00060937623,0.0003700015,0.00044251536,0.00045044164,0.0010097831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782974,0.0010410482,0.00015253744,0.0003880842,0.00010887771,0.00047973773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014002967,0.00028481195,0.00032813314,0.0001162867,0.0010811321,0.00011376114,0.00071959663,0.00063032965,0.0014342559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005185277,0.00027309035,0.00023266881,0.00035135582,0.0019720278,0.000549326,0.00008685391,0.0005998329,0.0004969696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051412542,0.00006794815,0.0037994136,0.000062824285,0.00010088715,0.00013509957,0.0358893,0.000017293494,0.0006055089,0.7800677,0.007815983,0.17138664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000489441,0.0002191528,0.0112562915,0.00052578625,0.00022561383,0.00010063028,0.021309985,0.00003348519,0.00050371495,0.08258163,0.8820539,0.000700366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15584183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14582926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029050822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004973128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418172035","doi":"","title":"Canadian developments. Criminal charges laid in three new situations.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07218636201605907,"score_gpt":0.287908660898104,"score_spread":0.21572229888204494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418172035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5658013,0.00075184193,0.00007961211,0.17254892,0.0005598977,0.0010062467,0.000005898538,0.000093009075,0.25915328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916234,0.00006089204,0.00054395566,0.0008086038,0.00031831817,0.00015529999,0.0000025444238,0.000004739781,0.0064822547],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989451,0.000029273735,0.00013129925,0.00014704012,0.00022271552,0.0005245579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994186,0.000041593394,0.000024409183,0.00007685534,0.00003185956,0.00040668817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005264776,0.00006306557,0.000076290984,0.000116459356,0.00025402918,0.00007067159,0.00021574245,0.00005325319,0.00026165054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025706718,0.000067486755,0.000020717529,0.0002253983,0.000047378497,0.00031275692,0.000014857249,0.000076323144,0.0001614826],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064516776,0.000019403087,0.045465123,0.0000045375664,0.0000047406866,0.00000894582,0.0098054055,0.0000074328905,0.0000013086144,0.030859675,0.011859386,0.9019576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077653494,0.0000013510737,0.5588546,0.0000050266813,0.000005500042,5.4072626e-7,0.00059606234,0.0000026327566,0.000019164856,0.0013735543,0.43897384,0.00009009833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6158485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9018675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058569387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007863383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3867096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W242310400","doi":"","title":"Investigative Hearings into Terrorist Offences: A Challenge to the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Obligation; Supreme court; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Interpretation (philosophy); Suspect; Criminal procedure; Criminal code; Computer science","score_opus":0.09540794634238248,"score_gpt":0.40028758582822466,"score_spread":0.3048796394858422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W242310400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4430721,0.00029410707,0.00003289701,0.41064292,0.00011225664,0.00021120452,8.41087e-7,0.000040323135,0.14559333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941216,0.000029302082,0.0010806076,0.001256041,0.0003254617,0.000013717767,2.0779247e-7,0.0000043503683,0.0031686772],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991976,0.00007942006,0.0001035002,0.00014249832,0.00028723356,0.00018977113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995114,0.000098151824,0.00004979376,0.00016170113,0.00006124469,0.00011767672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005057051,0.00006469495,0.00010374921,0.000016894885,0.00032141432,0.000031911593,0.00031859885,0.000036894187,0.000121983954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016479797,0.000047128993,0.00003593204,0.0001496742,0.00062642136,0.00014128233,0.000068371395,0.00008344858,0.00015160024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009007211,0.000024958093,0.000051260733,0.000012792324,0.000004904913,7.94115e-7,0.7939768,0.0000170139,0.00056772446,0.19906308,0.0037890035,0.0024827158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004508675,0.00006795525,0.0002679458,0.000064532884,0.000008398945,2.9020714e-7,0.074897,0.000011015523,0.0020797874,0.0045992043,0.91786987,0.00008889817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075866915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0653818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91408086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058397236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072948664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95167255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2430966300","doi":"","title":"The Elusive Goal of Impartiality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Faith; Law; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.034034443408597854,"score_gpt":0.3183315617562773,"score_spread":0.28429711834767946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2430966300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642005,0.00358772,0.00084717065,0.0016685631,0.00033825552,0.000103421284,0.0000011017999,0.000009136226,0.029244117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576885,0.0035284346,0.000019798472,0.000009173183,0.00013703946,7.641594e-7,4.7258162e-8,0.0000026306743,0.00053326273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841255,0.00016509878,0.00020773492,0.000054072465,0.0002596823,0.0009008889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942863,0.00009928146,0.00019500867,0.00008889117,0.00014077172,0.00004744009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003540753,0.000042322397,0.0000896254,0.000015551916,0.00041776517,0.000011208745,0.00034263256,0.000031898355,0.00004757728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022742577,0.00002793758,0.000088781366,0.00009918291,0.0003537071,0.000117724165,0.000021590435,0.0004034874,0.000005449508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007053776,0.000024414674,0.002877252,0.0000017181718,0.000030637068,4.6178607e-7,0.0060409694,3.278852e-7,0.00021342713,0.98031294,0.000064631065,0.0103626605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001705901,0.00036691202,0.005648774,0.000019859337,0.000052753192,0.000025923982,0.04459131,0.0000023844543,0.0019985759,0.9348732,0.012159485,0.00009017877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046861027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02240419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04543971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016447998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020063194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243170063","doi":"","title":"Beyond Self-Congratulation: The Charter at 25 in an International Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Charter; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.014464263385026087,"score_gpt":0.3339902461082677,"score_spread":0.3195259827232416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243170063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89741015,0.0007350451,0.00029809328,0.019194456,0.0008679764,0.0001371646,7.510388e-7,0.000029995805,0.081326365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497324,0.00072384457,0.000029134786,0.00022346091,0.0015191435,0.0000017601272,9.639324e-7,0.0000061029523,0.0025223196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803364,0.00012233504,0.0001738784,0.00014402483,0.00041149178,0.0011146487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994826,0.000090518086,0.00008556032,0.000089751644,0.00017728494,0.000074336676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040164893,0.0000744626,0.00007087762,0.000080099155,0.00061512843,0.000112224516,0.0003937607,0.00006022471,0.00016280462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007983306,0.000056325036,0.000057267265,0.00017705781,0.00010420621,0.00061142846,0.000025442367,0.00083408627,0.00002804003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053460306,0.000047267295,0.024763191,3.3853422e-7,0.000024554309,0.000007951176,0.02381557,0.000004644592,0.00006686969,0.94827443,0.00009711995,0.0028446119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080560456,0.00033185852,0.10798854,0.000022851946,0.00004311298,0.00030853297,0.17813557,0.00008058064,0.000046181365,0.58013886,0.13174973,0.0003485515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010995448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17899337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36813554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031380835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008299668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83598787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W243230475","doi":"","title":"Process and Substance: Charkaoui I in the Light of Subsequent Developments","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Minimalism (technical communication); Law; Political science; Principle of legality; Charter; Terrorism; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03575217836785541,"score_gpt":0.30254065242771777,"score_spread":0.2667884740598624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W243230475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97952634,0.002642637,0.000034599376,0.0014590983,0.00006162873,0.000103904684,1.8895211e-7,0.0000045483703,0.016167058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995331,0.004275337,0.000019309502,0.000048484802,0.000049476956,0.000004507068,1.1290337e-7,0.0000036274166,0.00026814628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840385,0.00011552899,0.00018045877,0.00009134179,0.0003093053,0.00089952105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971277,0.000023677108,0.00010086535,0.00005510003,0.00006753348,0.00004007762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030070483,0.00006174525,0.000092494935,0.000045996927,0.00022716992,0.000018933013,0.0003185022,0.00003752237,0.000024460824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052704243,0.00004227423,0.000023208266,0.00020040183,0.00010706866,0.00021119272,0.0000073898345,0.00048330828,0.000002778132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009205345,0.00010823852,0.083151646,0.000019283276,0.000029229535,0.000012255715,0.17593491,2.2291205e-7,0.00016392913,0.7311516,0.00004602931,0.009290624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069477205,0.00032410023,0.07963847,0.0001965322,0.000045817535,0.00021612202,0.22920792,0.0000014722779,0.0012986189,0.68099594,0.0070459023,0.00033433834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004237478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022299908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053273007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019874459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012293237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99554056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2434966172","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2792472","title":"Facial Attacks on Telewarrants: Failure to Define 'Impracticable'","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Computer security; Psychology","score_opus":0.02247972472123791,"score_gpt":0.3250773761652835,"score_spread":0.3025976514440456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2434966172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6672941,0.00056474656,0.009278759,0.2906555,0.0011209729,0.000417028,0.000010299442,0.00015118373,0.030507429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877391,0.0015050425,0.00010704311,0.00062241254,0.0010955272,0.000005480458,2.5530093e-7,0.000016360487,0.008908778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960947,0.0001882495,0.00023454292,0.00024824412,0.0006320877,0.0026021446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990489,0.00024904907,0.000110835004,0.00016313283,0.00013609978,0.00029200467],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024909447,0.00014761116,0.00017476462,0.00010356422,0.0008507782,0.00012189914,0.00045131735,0.00010619146,0.00047103618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011393335,0.00009930772,0.00011024292,0.00024172846,0.00011273099,0.00047679365,0.00003265087,0.00085628865,0.0010992913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040000502,0.000115884046,0.0020841705,0.0000032578496,0.00007708262,0.00002238291,0.0020970395,0.0000054989114,0.0031660579,0.702382,0.013187657,0.27645895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005539744,0.0007862586,0.00042299344,0.00009571941,0.00003556941,0.00011845901,0.006770557,3.660171e-7,0.0002545077,0.09916139,0.8914969,0.0003033104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058205775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023170164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87830925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012622118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002336706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2435699182","doi":"","title":"Ontario Court of Justice dismisses police negligence case: HIV infection a factor.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Res ipsa loquitur; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Law; Political science; Criminology; Tort; Medicine; Psychology; Virology; Liability","score_opus":0.07934118437442574,"score_gpt":0.32304969357856195,"score_spread":0.24370850920413623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2435699182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95931464,0.000066628156,0.00028785874,0.0011781408,0.00039280488,0.00029377372,0.000004433621,0.00004612096,0.038415577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99232864,0.00019074242,0.000033670152,0.000081943086,0.00021605066,0.00009144768,8.5406487e-7,0.0000045845904,0.0070520756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897635,0.00006826157,0.00016522387,0.00015886714,0.00027387106,0.0003574471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932885,0.0001733427,0.00008908236,0.00013110727,0.00010644027,0.00017117812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002983906,0.000079509795,0.00011827881,0.000044805587,0.00032601025,0.00005091576,0.00012609866,0.00006445937,0.00022007673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026687593,0.00007806969,0.000051458905,0.00025261182,0.00015671276,0.00034427163,0.000027401202,0.0000969565,0.00002133237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017702878,0.00042005946,0.5901783,0.00020492804,0.00006803828,0.00047891893,0.1276184,0.000081347775,0.000073227224,0.013055644,0.010792867,0.25685126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090392925,0.000015001282,0.6414573,0.000017023376,0.00009206893,0.00010875838,0.0027578329,0.000004832837,0.00009368295,0.00018680404,0.35502467,0.0001516125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7501693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8056852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34423178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022161314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013540074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31835893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244850686","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1421","title":"When the Law Breaks Down: Aboriginal Peoples in Canada and Governmental Defiance of the Rule of Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011896151923030843,"score_gpt":0.25592211491973,"score_spread":0.24402596299669915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244850686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3725086,0.0010353139,0.0000049878677,0.003394218,0.00030157805,0.000110846784,0.000024938829,0.0000024638748,0.62261707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894196,0.00025365784,0.00015464942,0.00045073451,0.000055038592,0.0000018274559,1.4740338e-7,0.0000054291804,0.00013654267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840754,0.00025528666,0.00028140598,0.00011165025,0.0006743452,0.0002697909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992614,0.00022695123,0.00021601442,0.00014629729,0.000057162273,0.00009220071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007179355,0.000094091134,0.00017059884,0.0000058240043,0.000659402,0.000059347454,0.00037741184,0.000038600105,0.000117939984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004373132,0.000058824433,0.00005767282,0.00007759285,0.0006525424,0.00022173722,0.000029629318,0.00024504957,8.1980517e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016004515,0.000021755493,0.014853746,0.000013486991,0.000008778801,0.0000074284285,0.0028060277,0.0000122214215,0.0001881635,0.98183125,0.00015733582,0.000083809195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022178027,0.0001935248,0.07008325,0.0012198712,0.000231856,0.00075181894,0.08241275,0.000019697223,0.012003224,0.27759424,0.5524232,0.000848804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.704237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003594889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007673121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5071654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461021661","doi":"10.7202/1036577ar","title":"Municipalités et hydrocarbures : chargées à blanc sur la ligne de front?","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.029500633432145828,"score_gpt":0.2974677440520522,"score_spread":0.26796711061990636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461021661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75233,0.013283823,0.00030278385,0.07528567,0.00089124654,0.0002682809,0.00008367989,0.00014678309,0.1574077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632904,0.009860998,0.00039484407,0.00076448557,0.0011656227,0.0000320539,0.0000036983492,0.000038057806,0.1244498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703556,0.0007136197,0.00037483734,0.00047019267,0.0003279594,0.0010778481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977233,0.0011254208,0.00016472358,0.00048265755,0.00007918269,0.00042474933],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018842572,0.00021818296,0.00042318384,0.00006421882,0.00027012115,0.00012072259,0.0007006174,0.00039470312,0.0008979057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006913685,0.00025630093,0.00026673236,0.00021081972,0.00064367586,0.0006105945,0.00012374212,0.00027012656,0.00093562034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010827927,0.00041509356,0.020090219,0.0006435059,0.00016307046,0.00066613505,0.044231806,0.000056235018,0.0061871605,0.8022976,0.055213943,0.06992693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006429093,0.00019566718,0.008700535,0.0029488564,0.00024732554,0.00017828973,0.0019371142,0.00034313273,0.0016237929,0.13340734,0.84895474,0.0008202976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014807307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010442268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7937408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051926036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039471392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470822190","doi":"","title":"Les tribunaux et les possibilités de redressement d’une politique défectueuse: l’exemple de la cause Wynberg","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019772998910635886,"score_gpt":0.2757011076817791,"score_spread":0.2559281087711432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470822190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8593765,0.023938827,0.001958817,0.012807092,0.0006103244,0.00032464686,0.00007393873,0.00014844845,0.100761406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627023,0.00255573,0.0013079315,0.0003203562,0.00041475543,0.000011019783,0.000016545015,0.000025792942,0.032645587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612767,0.00096816884,0.00045119808,0.00059270114,0.0007565418,0.0011037374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716145,0.0012251918,0.00025663277,0.00038794396,0.00023150932,0.00073729566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026305343,0.00037369775,0.00034322464,0.00017473206,0.0084964065,0.00014393353,0.0005544027,0.00063976937,0.000121859244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043547023,0.00044174845,0.0003203051,0.0005397425,0.0017850284,0.0006335916,0.00025356273,0.00065822614,0.00003773531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000642513,0.00060256885,0.06002885,0.00017520407,0.00024971217,0.006189263,0.12516104,0.0012117812,0.007143911,0.785283,0.0042162803,0.009095837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010634756,0.00023602882,0.15727735,0.0005085426,0.00047300523,0.0016432509,0.07449969,0.00021649442,0.00816304,0.009561043,0.745571,0.00078708684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68511415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19961208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77572197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010925268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027191392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474446899","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Browse Acts by Department","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Public administration; Public relations","score_opus":0.06534571506068343,"score_gpt":0.31036194272545564,"score_spread":0.2450162276647722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474446899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26166892,0.00045810154,0.0009961097,0.008740178,0.0002199609,0.00028988026,0.0000017095663,0.00013752838,0.7274876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608589,0.00011209143,0.0023633041,0.00024882564,0.00006637538,0.0000012753019,0.0000016209319,0.0000035132698,0.03634413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994192,0.000032834465,0.000079863734,0.00012894918,0.00015569775,0.00018346147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958086,0.00004822061,0.000025343546,0.00009216043,0.000023229031,0.00023021491],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015096736,0.000052817104,0.00005939743,0.000014015795,0.00027120946,0.00004682041,0.000091999274,0.0000422831,0.0012393257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059344587,0.000046520796,0.000017889059,0.00007400343,0.00008347453,0.0002859148,0.000026667009,0.000031642758,0.000083382896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021433254,0.000056517267,0.0106943585,0.0000061216397,0.000011449492,0.0000038244343,0.015973296,2.2488274e-7,0.00025642157,0.7713722,0.19085297,0.010751186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001180863,0.00004633783,0.04236083,0.000012222331,0.00002149321,0.0000013258397,0.0014707326,0.0000026747484,0.0011875787,0.0058745584,0.94877326,0.0001309008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037636787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057485994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7654976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024267743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021613123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476760318","doi":"","title":"Tickets … and More Tickets: A Case Study of the Enforcement of the Ontario Safe Streets Act","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Law enforcement; Advertising; Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03803191071512667,"score_gpt":0.31200037193663355,"score_spread":0.27396846122150686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476760318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758738,0.000014204007,5.8986166e-7,0.0010143925,0.0000829079,0.0006138918,8.61839e-7,0.000004253096,0.022395045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960272,0.0000034489892,0.000020469935,0.00009268289,0.000014292095,0.000010387255,5.839768e-8,0.0000023327102,0.0038291842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991089,0.00009819516,0.00018081289,0.000107663895,0.0003645581,0.00013985975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941,0.000114623326,0.000092090224,0.00025582375,0.00007824878,0.000049225535],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027232384,0.00006578732,0.00010831087,0.000010786817,0.00028392576,0.000026827527,0.00024888094,0.000028032926,0.0011647654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007323727,0.000032151518,0.000041179926,0.00009266404,0.00027493425,0.00012168611,0.00015450474,0.000069657304,0.00000327473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018371547,0.00046841116,0.41035533,0.00003502614,0.00006241145,0.000021332004,0.57045543,0.000020747173,0.00012605163,0.009392628,0.0023086818,0.0067355935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006408542,0.00038319797,0.341083,0.00009859721,0.00017564035,0.00003482956,0.64833266,0.000087005385,0.0007263978,0.0007590087,0.007485933,0.00019292849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8478324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90389335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07787721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056584413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478701778","doi":"","title":"Annotation: United States v Wakeling (Supreme Court of Canada 2014)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Annotation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02610424271897465,"score_gpt":0.29400875368371004,"score_spread":0.2679045109647354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478701778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94689775,0.0055251922,0.0030084415,0.03487678,0.0009976985,0.00015573898,0.000008527618,0.00003557933,0.008494311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527895,0.0021892134,0.000056130168,0.00014321945,0.00026810885,8.2921514e-7,0.000005380642,0.0000066322727,0.002051532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771565,0.00014605263,0.00022487868,0.000089788584,0.0006146612,0.0012089743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902177,0.000089561894,0.00014897769,0.00007396284,0.0004816257,0.00018409909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027956287,0.00007213613,0.000115723786,0.000061904895,0.00032806984,0.00003866758,0.00024690022,0.000036299036,0.000041944266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002677297,0.000066640954,0.000033413173,0.00023414414,0.000086081964,0.00020698004,0.000013630555,0.0005121815,0.0000058839573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003173394,0.00012672137,0.010465976,0.000030199752,0.0002656632,0.000039332026,0.035782997,0.008513306,0.00019034212,0.7547395,0.17741418,0.012114444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005995358,0.00033103075,0.00026393612,0.00006389117,0.00006438387,0.000080602695,0.1913109,0.00066720566,0.00013897687,0.255161,0.55101174,0.0003067762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6891169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95075494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4995785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012828698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01570612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480676912","doi":"10.29173/alr291","title":"Enforcing American Letters of Request: The Fickle Charter Guarantee of Evidentiary Immunity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Self-incrimination; Sociology; History; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.05785432683546389,"score_gpt":0.3551757091715892,"score_spread":0.2973213823361253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480676912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53639036,0.1902255,0.000060589522,0.11226048,0.00082722364,0.0019523414,0.000009095713,0.000048371196,0.15822603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97330254,0.022720346,0.000050591298,0.0035058735,0.000065467575,0.000013454859,0.0000022807517,0.0000073756105,0.00033207415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840915,0.00048401178,0.00039901357,0.00012636435,0.0003732146,0.00020823014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984668,0.00056934735,0.00032406507,0.00044588142,0.00013280023,0.00006110785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017618035,0.000096880736,0.0003795643,0.0000135588925,0.00015833501,0.00001780704,0.00054503913,0.000021143034,0.00010732111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068595377,0.000066289474,0.00015354308,0.0002820433,0.0008731468,0.00028213285,0.00006964406,0.00010868786,0.000047868605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007064614,0.000187356,0.00450971,0.004463345,0.00019290134,0.000010053763,0.04720526,0.000008016807,0.0013398331,0.8213386,0.07434787,0.04632641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009212617,0.00008008134,0.00044022946,0.0050410964,0.00022092153,0.0000052592377,0.0015423303,0.000004113025,0.00030395653,0.00041958946,0.9916725,0.00017779153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26519227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031231916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91732466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030336496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008558139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483492331","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267805.003.0005","title":"The Admissibility of Expert Evidence: (1) Evidentiary Reliability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rules of evidence; Federal Rules of Evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Admissible evidence; Set (abstract data type); Construct (python library); Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Criminal procedure; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.105476845067538,"score_gpt":0.3847749821384953,"score_spread":0.2792981370709573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483492331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021665411,0.017097514,0.000038351103,0.012028871,0.00069690257,0.0005884404,0.000004669417,0.00008949432,0.9692391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04725934,0.041187376,0.00012061079,0.00021988254,0.00056705985,0.000015223943,0.00000164222,0.000023698269,0.9106052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669695,0.00022544673,0.00075590826,0.0005939005,0.0013179304,0.0004098679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472076,0.0028899356,0.00036725632,0.0011939253,0.00057520287,0.00025294314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044183517,0.0002770249,0.00043547645,0.000040305007,0.00088371296,0.00011514108,0.0011597356,0.0004327684,0.0065557905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034493832,0.0001877595,0.00042630685,0.00006869455,0.0019004971,0.00040687414,0.00022443487,0.00040298924,0.0001651334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020895402,0.000052443727,0.0006747969,0.0001640422,0.00005564616,0.000018527993,0.003459635,0.0000011707974,0.00002012271,0.8012977,0.14506866,0.04897826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029103483,0.00004805758,0.00017455446,0.0006447316,0.000049608818,0.0000013300938,0.0006286104,0.0000018689026,0.000023167395,0.07868009,0.91949683,0.000222014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010844623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009873954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7744282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027745258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085323426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99574226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489364563","doi":"","title":"Six Degrees of Separation: Canadian Accessory Liability in Afghan War Crimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Doctrine; Causation; Law; Torture; Commit; Political science; Liability; War crime; Principal (computer security); Criminal law; Legal doctrine; Sociology; International law; Criminology; Human rights","score_opus":0.16316883978141764,"score_gpt":0.40295478023378983,"score_spread":0.2397859404523722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489364563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96176004,0.0059796497,0.000004931922,0.0022724848,0.0005413566,0.000103506005,0.00000513527,0.000007127454,0.029325793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979128,0.0011520752,0.00036769107,0.000062945306,0.00017239868,0.0000019640484,1.4122031e-7,0.0000050287786,0.0003249105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985005,0.00019113226,0.0005293053,0.00011331015,0.00038754597,0.00027819758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869806,0.00019199497,0.0002969745,0.00010526767,0.0005423113,0.0001653822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015235828,0.00010428467,0.00036309782,0.00016213684,0.00028442597,0.00002271709,0.00035841065,0.000060227787,0.000093662005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096012885,0.000085377906,0.00010624127,0.0002592985,0.0004778074,0.000707773,0.0000465809,0.00018566269,0.0000051697666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039220884,0.00040654594,0.5549697,0.00019390079,0.00038667716,0.00043531618,0.38238978,0.00013673505,0.00019005769,0.039897986,0.01479871,0.005802343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005484491,0.00061478565,0.72982514,0.00039081107,0.00019329008,0.000021709327,0.11838874,0.000007750599,0.0011892581,0.004115947,0.14428768,0.00041640663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34285972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.869171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020571375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006646665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66151625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490014595","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Canadian law: Law reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07051856764996028,"score_gpt":0.31627127700367474,"score_spread":0.24575270935371446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490014595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021360873,0.0008597703,0.000002597786,0.0076146405,0.0024668584,0.000309114,0.00009307186,0.00021918895,0.9884134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05463108,0.0039624893,0.00092389964,0.020969063,0.003948208,0.000054177755,0.00016022933,0.000101143334,0.9152497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717444,0.000106043466,0.0004500613,0.0005206974,0.0006200308,0.0011287003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979938,0.0000966758,0.00014492394,0.0005594169,0.00023905342,0.0009660751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087860576,0.00034637735,0.0004467692,0.00013669548,0.0014836367,0.0003188299,0.0013136393,0.00081859843,0.008677946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010921013,0.0003005801,0.0002310423,0.00020268389,0.0009753283,0.0005692835,0.00010273454,0.0004924432,0.0009237915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028606905,0.000006038376,0.0000072835464,0.000032226257,0.00001461647,0.000030226916,0.0020014145,2.0865976e-8,1.2993091e-7,0.6820112,0.31507918,0.00081480056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040844174,0.000040337476,0.0000079513875,0.00017695998,0.000053825723,0.000003173417,0.0027095878,2.0160007e-7,0.000013597114,0.017702319,0.9788019,0.00044927167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99893796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66430885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012154807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021265731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493488433","doi":"10.29173/alr12","title":"History of Factums","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.04623457965126544,"score_gpt":0.32147762775727123,"score_spread":0.2752430481060058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493488433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038086678,0.07580436,0.000013728096,0.006019293,0.0003223834,0.0001506979,2.3510472e-7,0.000011644812,0.91729677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88340247,0.05947798,0.0001189406,0.009532807,0.00018042812,0.000017431437,0.0000025111171,0.000011705127,0.047255706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992251,0.00016328333,0.00017945385,0.000110542096,0.00018418836,0.00013742823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992428,0.0003519076,0.00008761583,0.00019994682,0.000046488196,0.00007123877],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000599128,0.000056050478,0.00021357341,0.000006146855,0.00005799163,0.0000040360324,0.0002158083,0.000029162205,0.0012736472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005288483,0.000047331025,0.00008798917,0.00005188961,0.00024985406,0.00011061655,0.00001913911,0.000043906013,0.00027627326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.679582e-7,0.000010480819,0.00006730354,0.0006265774,0.0000030288259,1.729279e-7,0.00062892656,2.6894504e-8,0.000008314772,0.9386619,0.048188925,0.01180362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018564007,0.000014113251,0.00004041442,0.0010102433,0.00003407704,3.9278495e-7,0.000010356049,5.880549e-7,0.0000064308488,0.00054193614,0.99826264,0.000060217157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0652427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027052073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007607975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007743865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495669462","doi":"10.29173/alr381","title":"Tessling, Brown, and A.M.: Towards a Principled Approach to Section 8","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Order (exchange); Law; Section (typography); Balance (ability); Expectation of privacy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10847502019986824,"score_gpt":0.3655767767496166,"score_spread":0.2571017565497483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495669462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073328987,0.037130218,0.00014726637,0.018000782,0.0003667911,0.0010547761,9.465599e-7,0.00005879957,0.93590754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94071114,0.024871737,0.0022812593,0.01321636,0.0009073683,0.00022845497,0.000009574127,0.000031358824,0.017742755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988545,0.00017468566,0.00019126307,0.00025501568,0.00029315034,0.00023138578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923366,0.000081506405,0.000053959557,0.00018796342,0.00011505428,0.00032782435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012067514,0.00009976654,0.00023765428,0.000014314111,0.00021082806,0.000070694354,0.00017797611,0.00005392977,0.000042002746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094327057,0.00008306659,0.000047676487,0.00024841866,0.000101116144,0.00021684066,0.0000701957,0.0000817806,0.00010294141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001897136,0.000114236136,0.0006109892,0.0017741891,0.000024570047,0.000002528322,0.012437574,0.0000029423504,0.000011130384,0.91174376,0.042413414,0.030845707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062480096,0.00003444851,0.000082386825,0.0006576938,0.00003853827,0.0000068692934,0.00018141157,0.0000063954917,0.0000046078244,0.00030436317,0.99849796,0.00012282388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072494194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028963499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95608455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011570271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496769881","doi":"10.29173/alr178","title":"Discarding Reasonable Expectations of Privacy: A Critique of R. v. Patrick","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expectation of privacy; Warrant; Appeal; Law; Residence; Political science; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02491581214226828,"score_gpt":0.3569125698918367,"score_spread":0.3319967577495684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496769881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11719602,0.119887725,0.000081078615,0.03796453,0.0007123456,0.0016897687,0.000017543785,0.000052977313,0.722398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808055,0.017417591,0.00074431545,0.00018474313,0.000065217326,0.000029524228,0.0000025720685,0.000006787247,0.00074370793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904156,0.00012328997,0.00030647582,0.00014006207,0.00022480526,0.0001637857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987363,0.00060181785,0.00014835624,0.00027864656,0.00015893085,0.000075926546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050834735,0.00006980569,0.00029549765,0.0000148144345,0.00015141141,0.000012381753,0.00026982455,0.00004683992,0.00035368092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016796485,0.00006051568,0.0001477523,0.00027056216,0.0002318797,0.00023334897,0.000039054634,0.00009710592,0.000024533454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016022256,0.000035136356,0.0010307272,0.0010634908,0.000009434909,6.9198035e-7,0.0021588167,5.656052e-8,0.0003332475,0.9894137,0.0025007552,0.0034523655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004877996,0.00002104931,0.00024414936,0.0022600659,0.00011991278,0.0000029442879,0.0005143275,0.0000010860036,0.0004748282,0.00242872,0.9937689,0.00011525925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049173735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030114802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010019646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009926814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497831312","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139924511.006","title":"The Attorney General, Select Committees and Penal Populism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Law; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.06904944099096307,"score_gpt":0.26986519098702794,"score_spread":0.20081574999606489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497831312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048029397,0.0013948885,0.000010077829,0.00046824946,0.0002933313,0.00026621122,0.000057633388,0.00007765151,0.99695164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044342624,0.0010552788,0.000028950357,0.00007571676,0.00043775176,4.7613125e-7,0.000009532287,0.000019836481,0.9939382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860764,0.00012677185,0.00012738268,0.00033814184,0.0004592783,0.0003407994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988296,0.0001764943,0.0001463951,0.00030490386,0.00025032036,0.00029225464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045349795,0.0002315763,0.00025206985,0.000047437392,0.0017547681,0.0001829175,0.00063868955,0.00026799622,0.000005460822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043082862,0.00021185265,0.00010721268,0.000007870226,0.0010843998,0.00011957967,0.00031600145,0.00038808023,0.000013900367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003468625,0.0000016812195,0.000005271324,0.000010145587,0.000029384008,0.00005008559,0.00029188354,1.8020508e-7,0.0000026880048,0.7278139,0.27071202,0.0010480924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014679463,0.000033480297,0.000022810034,0.00005975877,0.00013299014,0.0000067805267,0.00031467047,0.000005930812,0.000005555113,0.00013685777,0.9988666,0.0002677405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075257695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081429956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7281546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021338997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030102715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502483087","doi":"10.3917/puf.incha.2010.01","title":"L’erreur judiciaire","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Presses Universitaires de France eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.017987787991761484,"score_gpt":0.2554283134352458,"score_spread":0.23744052544348432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502483087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006980942,0.005852913,0.0003800308,0.009547685,0.0030307928,0.00056518195,0.00008769602,0.00027149837,0.97328323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38132554,0.0010877241,0.0005573278,0.00049654086,0.0018199993,0.000010619509,0.000021828953,0.00007336646,0.61460704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635196,0.00031479928,0.0003922353,0.0008794626,0.00084835506,0.001213183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972694,0.00066874165,0.0004295179,0.0007354158,0.00032172937,0.0005752011],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043954706,0.0006464057,0.0006863274,0.00018182113,0.00170181,0.00016690302,0.0018762682,0.0012410885,0.0016149093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017732041,0.00078129116,0.00045538344,0.00014629448,0.003680809,0.00051210483,0.00042514637,0.0016935654,0.0006864208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011705321,0.00009941762,0.0018740534,0.0006587144,0.00023542802,0.00086640695,0.006809939,0.000061057704,0.00032601348,0.6111415,0.10699042,0.27082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028127336,0.000098598684,0.00050905405,0.0009896362,0.00043964162,0.000019555442,0.0008387646,0.00005604861,0.00020456106,0.030636914,0.9651221,0.00080385315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059313364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053955154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005483262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00182226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503225817","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493874.028","title":"Postscript: Some recent developments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); Terrorism; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05531350893714272,"score_gpt":0.25496451295626077,"score_spread":0.19965100401911806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503225817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008872341,0.00043260166,0.0000126283485,0.0004473852,0.00060633227,0.00035120497,0.00007273833,0.00015446168,0.9978339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006013967,0.002785246,0.00014059214,0.0003342896,0.0004912649,5.0527706e-7,0.000024505396,0.000030115449,0.99559206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823135,0.0000610754,0.00019028269,0.00048390529,0.00058230705,0.0004510539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886966,0.00005894256,0.00018408782,0.00032280094,0.00024302001,0.00032146447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023298756,0.00029838996,0.00031619053,0.00013062058,0.0007262875,0.00008390617,0.0007467415,0.00041136635,0.00005962531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029287112,0.0003749615,0.00015127787,0.000009910798,0.0004671367,0.00026259795,0.00030561307,0.00039433606,0.00014886292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044090542,0.000007259764,0.0000021360465,0.000020265987,0.000047529407,0.00015394425,0.00045028992,1.9178961e-7,0.0000064248106,0.8945128,0.09402159,0.01073349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018117031,0.000018079501,0.000023421364,0.00016141067,0.00011301869,0.0000031296004,0.00020464725,4.818253e-7,0.00004216029,0.000035142017,0.9987849,0.00043242853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001257544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017379376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90476334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007917253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005409986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508640702","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/et3dq","title":"Instrumentalizing the Expressive: Transplanting Sentencing Circles into the Canadian Criminal Trial","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Instrumentalism; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Law reform; Mediation; Sociology","score_opus":0.05673834850736007,"score_gpt":0.3474162921212752,"score_spread":0.29067794361391514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508640702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86936396,0.000060802286,0.000068117544,0.019951394,0.0008044595,0.0003222596,0.0000014478217,0.000039767798,0.1093878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968917,0.000023201417,0.00013623491,0.0011907673,0.001243581,0.000012527204,9.3874957e-7,0.000005674925,0.0004954111],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986832,0.00021093525,0.00016257387,0.00016769141,0.00036707873,0.0004085098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993571,0.0002246156,0.00005303364,0.0001589168,0.00007005499,0.00013629123],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011914049,0.0000822629,0.00007760677,0.00003215681,0.005218901,0.00032858187,0.0005087039,0.000052585827,0.00036579595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019219986,0.000047289173,0.0000613069,0.00015351291,0.0008320927,0.00024369427,0.000028700559,0.00013562196,0.00005290312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086376606,0.000027354235,0.0023411831,0.00002608707,0.000042072235,0.000026961376,0.7309667,0.0000023134378,0.0019291283,0.16225077,0.005906783,0.09561691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028897694,0.00017786413,0.00154074,0.00021033545,0.00015847907,0.0000161189,0.6592841,0.00013623486,0.003680637,0.0040084254,0.32748547,0.00041180555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9199031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3215787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013630686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043178428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515375725","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2016.20603","title":"La résolution judiciaire du conflit (JDR) par les juges en Alberta : un modèle hybride","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03473260091732318,"score_gpt":0.2789906476953491,"score_spread":0.24425804677802593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515375725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8240276,0.0036578982,0.0069020544,0.089400545,0.0014019219,0.00023522366,0.000087746346,0.000072965115,0.07421406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94549924,0.0029572144,0.00031996085,0.0002372383,0.0013924247,0.00003187032,0.0000138111845,0.00002441661,0.049523808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977114,0.0004586316,0.0004695624,0.00043459472,0.00044278378,0.00048297894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662006,0.0024150196,0.00025363825,0.00024359091,0.00025244022,0.00021523792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088196393,0.00022076273,0.00032029886,0.00008919158,0.00035593877,0.0001088754,0.00069484353,0.0001992796,0.0016890509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000854374,0.00022810289,0.00021706051,0.00015240672,0.0007269419,0.0005059642,0.00012744716,0.00021959748,0.001013825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004681773,0.00020507365,0.036016207,0.00008049409,0.00012244385,0.00008299627,0.0033691667,0.00014042838,0.00048211523,0.7860134,0.0076616937,0.16577914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044673128,0.00005926471,0.045546316,0.0015741093,0.00011302173,0.00020882036,0.00044521014,0.0033858833,0.00070494635,0.05069237,0.89641756,0.00040575993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021648034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107545545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88875586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008862226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016879641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516326442","doi":"","title":"Parliamentary Privilege: A Relational Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028662243825128844,"score_gpt":0.2894202858813248,"score_spread":0.26075804205619596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516326442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16250294,0.0005944597,0.00009696783,0.00093367865,0.0005618046,0.0002584575,0.00001368274,0.000052166768,0.83498585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87584937,0.00065038295,0.004764237,0.00001563768,0.00019901934,5.817495e-7,0.0003377405,0.000012742062,0.11817029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889606,0.00007501213,0.00007708185,0.0002556572,0.00049717247,0.00019898919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929297,0.00006163387,0.00021419811,0.00018476389,0.00012918122,0.00011724453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026562667,0.00012274201,0.00021300382,0.00002819475,0.00053251395,0.000015386626,0.0003997195,0.00037115085,0.022790471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036966892,0.000165594,0.00014068348,0.000048162317,0.00019684828,0.00054612366,0.000032329386,0.00026036243,0.000035778572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001025439,0.0005458328,0.0025679565,0.000630053,0.0002963007,0.000037416892,0.6573303,0.000011708043,0.00092805276,0.17713769,0.036580272,0.12290902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003463422,0.00008433568,0.24321392,0.00015696116,0.000286912,9.945765e-7,0.549076,0.00004586758,0.000014627684,0.00024171743,0.20605063,0.00048169954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62814736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8092744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71681553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026221306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034492926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516442558","doi":"10.29173/alr244","title":"Do We Throw Our Privacy Rights Out With the Trash? The Alberta Court of Appeal’s Decision in &lt;i&gt;R. v. Patrick&lt;/i&gt;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Garbage; Law; Bin; State (computer science); Personally identifiable information; Control (management); Business; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03905461183162117,"score_gpt":0.3173526991077906,"score_spread":0.27829808727616945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516442558","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07273882,0.42809996,0.000102703605,0.26967755,0.00074828544,0.0050818124,0.000010775124,0.000057294117,0.22348279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84384,0.15009445,0.000099707286,0.0011667784,0.00016432033,0.000074437696,0.0000026838534,0.00002263653,0.004534974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651647,0.00067714154,0.000695404,0.0004955676,0.0010311163,0.00058427727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581206,0.0024666626,0.0003823276,0.0009975444,0.00017679161,0.00016459894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001664392,0.0003199286,0.0007162741,0.000036699985,0.0010186246,0.0000647498,0.0014803045,0.00012671182,0.00021618343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006051712,0.00015451919,0.00026765466,0.00073732977,0.0006661491,0.0003976637,0.00013705266,0.00028072164,0.00029806452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011514749,0.00038980588,0.0016473181,0.0009193941,0.00010604866,0.00005059495,0.03159186,0.000009586737,0.00004917786,0.7785776,0.1613463,0.025197119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023354676,0.00008289394,0.0007535028,0.0035725797,0.00015504927,0.00002604727,0.0001665731,0.0000039502133,0.000012646018,0.0015061187,0.9932367,0.0002503722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032684073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5289753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083645624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025483442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519542234","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2016.6","title":"<i>Kazemi</i>ou l’inhumaine immunité de l’État tortionnaire en droit canadien","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010662635580372561,"score_gpt":0.2556372702774987,"score_spread":0.24497463469712616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519542234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21886116,0.0014027655,0.00046302917,0.15499432,0.009756855,0.0005698998,0.004267199,0.00009351867,0.60959125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8595609,0.00069051905,0.00039894073,0.0027527227,0.0021631848,0.000060360995,0.000112950205,0.00007738089,0.13418306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521285,0.00027133085,0.0009714571,0.0007314147,0.0011709289,0.0016420311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507177,0.00049719634,0.00044952927,0.00052493234,0.0013413641,0.0021152054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014690764,0.0004712005,0.00047540732,0.0006419424,0.0005062462,0.00017539562,0.0025704908,0.0005340246,0.006758115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011698006,0.00054950017,0.0003869556,0.00034337124,0.001493029,0.0010854227,0.00015301477,0.00051857816,0.000305155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006862538,0.00007099157,0.009451614,0.000039618953,0.0004380159,0.0007674199,0.0033747526,0.000056515513,0.00028320483,0.9477751,0.022276137,0.015397997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007483119,0.00015891415,0.009537567,0.0013944575,0.00010986018,0.00046474425,0.001320978,0.0002676253,0.00048496996,0.03961304,0.94514245,0.0007570843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.911274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9832059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9228663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022744669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005942452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520075891","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1320","title":"Hart and Mack: New Restraints on Mr. Big and a New Approach to Unreliable Prosecution Evidence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Discretion; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Law; Federal Rules of Evidence; Political science; Admissible evidence; Digital evidence; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; History; Digital forensics","score_opus":0.2886321541641624,"score_gpt":0.3911996219176977,"score_spread":0.10256746775353531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520075891","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013245247,0.47864333,0.0016966836,0.23304437,0.0015703508,0.007729316,0.000018772791,0.00041126515,0.26364064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60024184,0.3051456,0.012724441,0.030902576,0.0027333328,0.00019737176,0.000020130936,0.00009074567,0.047943972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980765,0.00021063232,0.00027163862,0.00048463736,0.0005837806,0.00037279888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984757,0.00013087722,0.00007722358,0.00031135272,0.00013508147,0.0008698192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020153413,0.00017392465,0.00033914094,0.000028472248,0.0002595165,0.00017907862,0.00026539873,0.00007894899,0.0000593631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014986102,0.00015021574,0.000045688677,0.00030376113,0.00020193074,0.00040575946,0.00009479018,0.00014491414,0.00020830735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009417351,0.00007340245,0.0003606203,0.0018570162,0.000016735754,0.000010074288,0.0041217646,0.000005189473,0.00007421211,0.30667794,0.61129427,0.07541457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014628354,0.0001337629,0.00015958,0.0073137716,0.0000737924,0.000010820472,0.00018459558,0.0000071071836,0.000018246143,0.0033050766,0.9884352,0.0002117693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013266856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022629106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5869966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010318107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056226767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520499638","doi":"","title":"Failure to Fund: The Link between Canada's Legal Aid Crisis & Unconstitutional Delay in the Provision of State-Funded Legal Counsel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; State (computer science); Law; Order (exchange); Charter; Political science; Business; Constitutional right; Constitution; Finance; Supreme court","score_opus":0.029944859982759406,"score_gpt":0.3068753765478664,"score_spread":0.276930516565107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520499638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6657923,0.0015160423,0.002667677,0.32559863,0.00042306757,0.00055847445,0.000029846582,0.000016919801,0.0033970268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806494,0.0001774347,0.000043411073,0.00051341415,0.0007634244,0.0000064194146,0.0000028061168,0.0000066460543,0.000421537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962857,0.00046212832,0.00036902935,0.00017410741,0.0013113973,0.0013976682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894375,0.00025311142,0.00015724648,0.00016861515,0.00030100383,0.00017626269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006379967,0.00013119531,0.00018745566,0.00006435565,0.00064992753,0.0001762405,0.00082797895,0.000063976455,0.000013189851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027550344,0.00007953659,0.00007266362,0.0004200778,0.00021118725,0.00037907527,0.000037075777,0.001349674,0.0000069480366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028147278,0.00004748207,0.007865185,0.000009109124,0.0001084419,0.000047849717,0.013659257,0.001038801,0.000034882036,0.92771,0.03352904,0.015668493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041776476,0.00033750702,0.00083585357,0.000036097033,0.0000519702,0.00012423904,0.059992276,0.000010763572,0.000027672826,0.058005366,0.8799782,0.00018230619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.784052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8697046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001786976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029215321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97628814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522421002","doi":"10.7202/1067938ar","title":"L’ÉTAT DE DROIT, AU COEUR DU DIALOGUE ENTRE LE CANADA ET L’AMÉRIQUE LATINE ?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; International law; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025400009666532917,"score_gpt":0.2726014270415647,"score_spread":0.2472014173750318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522421002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33019564,0.0011490972,0.0019441021,0.23163286,0.0059761954,0.00031231076,0.000406894,0.00007904019,0.42830387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95598745,0.0005025945,0.00037005328,0.002865337,0.0028632637,0.00002780278,0.00011370125,0.000032574557,0.03723721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974818,0.00029150804,0.0004542577,0.00041182735,0.00067698734,0.00068360084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793833,0.0005071038,0.00024604745,0.00022299348,0.00042127777,0.00066421955],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012132442,0.00023653722,0.00029963301,0.00007155214,0.000224872,0.00014176122,0.000760834,0.00019509846,0.00034321003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014742722,0.00031984624,0.00015118529,0.00022510764,0.00027635554,0.00048442805,0.00010076854,0.0003822131,0.0001232146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079103185,0.00019835764,0.016232947,0.00006666738,0.00008304829,0.00056003773,0.012792622,0.0014899011,0.000047547746,0.9123278,0.05197954,0.0041423766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049212115,0.00006349988,0.004652943,0.0003335762,0.000050815303,0.00028704913,0.002924666,0.00430138,0.000081872,0.040703464,0.94570667,0.00040196677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98383844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055440366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012098541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523706814","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4722","title":"Administrative Judicial Decisions as a Hybrid Argumentative Activity Type","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Task (project management); Presentation (obstetrics); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14837381276895004,"score_gpt":0.4268070866641011,"score_spread":0.27843327389515105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523706814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871534,0.000016835282,0.0004645264,0.0037715607,0.00036726004,0.00018276717,0.000017090431,0.0000621878,0.30796438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627,0.00010115826,0.0001702592,0.00050332636,0.00016930002,0.000010291571,0.0000011106908,0.0000031597572,0.0027713845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895775,0.00007510797,0.00014571093,0.00013879256,0.0003576887,0.0003249587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894214,0.0005689238,0.00009098476,0.00010661567,0.00013169566,0.00015965449],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003681884,0.000095456104,0.00012178924,0.00003710099,0.00048243158,0.000058148045,0.00022589418,0.000051481096,0.0012781229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013966698,0.00006174325,0.000057994188,0.0001543329,0.0004071587,0.0008596832,0.000064196254,0.00008446943,0.0016288178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013528999,0.00019340802,0.002493484,0.000005632362,0.000053140244,0.00015529928,0.018567856,0.0000022741028,0.0019716076,0.6493932,0.01090688,0.3149043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001264588,0.0029530493,0.03741365,0.000243684,0.000080223464,0.000048816102,0.014289167,0.000009016766,0.017122334,0.12615462,0.7994626,0.0009582213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010319718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010551198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78855574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084952124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042507087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523956693","doi":"","title":"Acte fondateur ou loi ordinaire? La Charte des droits et libertés de la personne dans l’ordre juridique québécois","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international (RQDI)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035686281021801804,"score_gpt":0.3189085013754637,"score_spread":0.2832222203536619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523956693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5695553,0.0024499898,0.0018692608,0.042288765,0.0017863386,0.00034257714,0.00020029585,0.0001996868,0.38130778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178354,0.004021949,0.0010563583,0.001502934,0.0017599956,0.00008766095,0.000064988664,0.00010820669,0.07356247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952509,0.0012220201,0.0006951049,0.0008430555,0.0009050704,0.0010838868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630964,0.0011968212,0.00040460587,0.00046711933,0.00062413566,0.0009977006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033445419,0.00054309674,0.0005672933,0.0002298653,0.00041719593,0.0005544931,0.001483801,0.0006122554,0.00042625054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001970286,0.000667991,0.0004640108,0.0005535676,0.0012971532,0.0014688513,0.00022845088,0.0009257889,0.00061878416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002035121,0.00052809535,0.004473796,0.00023569871,0.00021840895,0.00096479827,0.08086051,0.00024186396,0.0006031364,0.8840388,0.009195732,0.018435635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072608737,0.00020265384,0.007149211,0.0013608455,0.0002151583,0.0014208404,0.006887949,0.0012171422,0.000292166,0.07524347,0.9044676,0.0008169097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24187668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24702944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89527184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029456506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003925751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525048104","doi":"10.7202/1067978ar","title":"COMMENTAIRES SUR LES DIFFICULTÉS CONCEPTUELLES QUE POSE LE RECOURS EN DIFFAMATION DANS LES ARRÊTS PRUD’HOMME ET BOU MALHAB : L’ABSENCE DE RECOURS POUR ATTEINTE À LA RÉPUTATION EN DROIT QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Québécois du P.E.N. International","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.034079194963019005,"score_gpt":0.29864429568713746,"score_spread":0.26456510072411843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525048104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6842065,0.0011458866,0.011115005,0.2919247,0.0008624933,0.00045649774,0.00029150688,0.00017150241,0.009825941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866137,0.003188139,0.001632134,0.0024423539,0.0015491358,0.00008963974,0.00023869095,0.00008095449,0.0041652657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952656,0.0014644397,0.00090709655,0.00082570186,0.00079120364,0.00074597436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958543,0.0022842332,0.0006463889,0.0002712151,0.00044740338,0.00049643265],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015526784,0.0004937309,0.00052799267,0.0001407104,0.00052098546,0.000396193,0.0011764254,0.0004891773,0.00044266917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020207723,0.0006286244,0.00040285438,0.0003335524,0.0006123382,0.0011653578,0.00015877942,0.00080840226,0.00014234909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036683446,0.000865921,0.03699278,0.00052477163,0.00037785436,0.00033129816,0.17069873,0.0060061584,0.008117883,0.69536203,0.012611684,0.067744076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031158887,0.0006450506,0.18471882,0.0056625074,0.0006499797,0.0007624357,0.17010286,0.067037806,0.0032156026,0.04218828,0.5189662,0.0029345525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31204388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3025729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65317374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022455337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016736775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525175687","doi":"10.7202/1068645ar","title":"LE FORUM NON CONVENIENS AU QUÉBEC, UNE VINGTAINE D’ANNÉES PLUS TARD : ENCORE QUELQUES QUESTIONS NON RÉSOLUES","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Law","score_opus":0.0234641316345461,"score_gpt":0.2850369654265361,"score_spread":0.26157283379199003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525175687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19313397,0.0021462734,0.012489325,0.66736394,0.0033372643,0.0005590726,0.0002563911,0.00021718223,0.1204966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822945,0.0011275773,0.000746622,0.0041869273,0.0030926086,0.00006309259,0.000073481504,0.000049716713,0.008365476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971833,0.00014253073,0.0006625806,0.00065728405,0.00058477354,0.000769501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980111,0.00034778353,0.0003495668,0.0002639723,0.00045468126,0.0005728881],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040962128,0.000345787,0.00047949978,0.00011413681,0.00077285606,0.0002027281,0.00096898637,0.0002757955,0.0004598765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086385035,0.00044875662,0.00037404743,0.00044375268,0.00083695014,0.00086300535,0.00017006474,0.0004809442,0.00049225264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023094796,0.00032375104,0.009263386,0.00037339295,0.00022988148,0.00032122427,0.08037947,0.0017898214,0.0009350375,0.87861115,0.016201431,0.011340502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061875983,0.00038165838,0.0029951707,0.0012037235,0.0001888385,0.00008589957,0.01229748,0.034870647,0.0004170471,0.015835386,0.93035287,0.0007525358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8145974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8499063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91415143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024000104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005867528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525597952","doi":"10.7202/1100729ar","title":"LE CONTRÔLE DE LÉGALITÉ DES DÉCISIONS DU CONSEIL DE SÉCURITÉ – UN BILAN APRÈS LES ORDONNANCES LOCKERBIE ET L’ARRÊT TADIC","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04983678606375305,"score_gpt":0.3063957635781011,"score_spread":0.2565589775143481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525597952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7546119,0.009206938,0.0016795355,0.14342411,0.0018893834,0.0003274876,0.0003427206,0.00029589023,0.08822203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96033156,0.01023709,0.00089229684,0.0017245017,0.0012224757,0.00007405147,0.000057270092,0.000044644483,0.025416128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970191,0.0004675154,0.000561033,0.00052564463,0.00052239123,0.00090431585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973036,0.0013890564,0.00026749267,0.00027554622,0.00033884437,0.0004254266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020120302,0.00028017003,0.00036607325,0.00019378179,0.000866224,0.0002885763,0.0009914389,0.00028860438,0.00064523536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020298013,0.00034553438,0.00031329598,0.0006421196,0.0012050113,0.00053697184,0.00014333539,0.0004112366,0.00044269735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007912411,0.0002625243,0.017151095,0.00014250656,0.00014470151,0.00049235934,0.008047364,0.0006356744,0.0005123186,0.93192935,0.016448194,0.024154812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005274784,0.000082710554,0.015507468,0.0011597367,0.000101362995,0.00032698832,0.0032551403,0.004005291,0.0002590539,0.13942665,0.83490795,0.00044015486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14311868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09716679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81845975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006771643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031049224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525758832","doi":"10.29173/alr239","title":"The Primacy of Expectancy in Estoppel Remedies: An Historical and Empirical Analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Law; Political science; Doctrine","score_opus":0.0971105376908705,"score_gpt":0.39418911143978713,"score_spread":0.29707857374891666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525758832","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29304567,0.5705816,0.00001776323,0.058875546,0.00024624393,0.0007918388,0.0000010786819,0.00002945916,0.07641078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82389283,0.17422082,0.00009064854,0.0006651552,0.000051559135,0.00001873822,0.0000011473097,0.0000045810075,0.0010545059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986281,0.0003065095,0.00035879103,0.00020570644,0.00029558068,0.00020531841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864876,0.0008033728,0.000102725164,0.000273952,0.000059858798,0.000111318186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006499797,0.00008236543,0.00038778735,0.00002572173,0.00036553066,0.000011302894,0.0002511215,0.000033699234,0.000056214656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084543665,0.00005566555,0.000116236726,0.0006392373,0.00038952814,0.00017049826,0.000034840898,0.00008809352,0.000006133273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006343843,0.00055705017,0.30387044,0.0012424634,0.000221394,0.00006420641,0.046396792,0.000001287286,0.000018627088,0.5914687,0.022683088,0.03341251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051956784,0.000039150458,0.006643856,0.00030133876,0.00019600774,0.0000036686495,0.00018470197,0.0000052337846,0.000002087448,0.00033473482,0.99213666,0.00010060769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07698115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28010237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012515213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008573805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9291653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526391125","doi":"","title":"Barreau du Québec et Tribunal des droits de la personne, La Charte des droits et libertés de la personne : pour qui et jusqu’où?, Cowansville (Qc), Yvon Blais, 2005","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04787705781536856,"score_gpt":0.3544702158719009,"score_spread":0.30659315805653237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526391125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7527229,0.008257306,0.002192596,0.05750702,0.00022091807,0.0006680796,0.00027458736,0.00036884297,0.17778775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94100916,0.01101705,0.012553506,0.005325549,0.00082376617,0.00023827997,0.00012299539,0.00026470853,0.028644966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96605265,0.026768064,0.0011057577,0.0015460094,0.001329414,0.0031980937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97982234,0.017318502,0.000492061,0.00070605497,0.00039068089,0.0012703382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032770876,0.0013097004,0.0011925916,0.00030804236,0.001701394,0.0014472192,0.0013357187,0.002371606,0.0022023055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00607745,0.0014781095,0.000887062,0.00089278165,0.0045452476,0.001189808,0.0003302161,0.0034398637,0.00026053554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007969215,0.0024295566,0.01084808,0.0009138203,0.0003441543,0.0017247497,0.75943726,0.0004071129,0.006992553,0.13221677,0.07981201,0.0040769987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003032374,0.0006539896,0.019231768,0.0015133616,0.0008992053,0.0018954624,0.122220844,0.0013341387,0.0011857317,0.019985002,0.8260708,0.0019773229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38314408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32707167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7462588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061929245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011120988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528212924","doi":"","title":"Essays in the History of Canadian Law: A Tribute to Peter N. Oliver","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Law; History; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.07328971323882177,"score_gpt":0.2777787014765783,"score_spread":0.20448898823775652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528212924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025792222,0.00049067015,0.0000011330158,0.0040547396,0.00037796338,0.00022435865,0.000018813998,0.00000752133,0.994799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044159507,0.0002874222,0.00003662634,0.003656977,0.00019061171,0.000015680014,0.0000057280804,0.0000071685904,0.99138385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888545,0.00010185142,0.00018420076,0.00016354844,0.00037833423,0.00028659604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993463,0.00015049579,0.000052164858,0.00019859632,0.00008361224,0.00016880085],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005525974,0.00010165805,0.00019048533,0.00023114597,0.00011327341,0.000011902741,0.00052299426,0.0001644886,0.00094176107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073049676,0.00007742608,0.00007519651,0.00011973406,0.00034105845,0.00007097338,0.000020243313,0.00018366841,0.00016849149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024529768,0.0000035423268,0.0000052380083,0.000006644319,0.000002115308,0.000036979647,0.013687247,2.6493737e-7,2.300913e-7,0.25077963,0.7353888,0.00008685003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029418648,0.000019735071,0.00006356908,0.000055104454,0.00001123907,0.000001590264,0.00031787157,1.1678072e-7,2.4144651e-7,0.001165037,0.9982297,0.000106384854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9525587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99598616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2628409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00183783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004350404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528333999","doi":"10.3138/9781442688391-012","title":"10. Fitness to Stand Trial and 10. Criminal Responsibility in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal responsibility; Criminal trial; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law","score_opus":0.051808920004830505,"score_gpt":0.2671148429674839,"score_spread":0.21530592296265338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528333999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004622721,0.0007787894,0.000003859536,0.00007554212,0.00012157743,0.0005453064,0.00008338067,0.000012499495,0.9937563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009359629,0.0002539555,0.00005168375,0.000012951323,0.00008255083,3.762686e-7,0.000002487103,0.000009051592,0.99022734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.000115516224,0.00019479035,0.00039337715,0.00048625036,0.00026420594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989485,0.00022853765,0.00013869436,0.0002801639,0.00016270825,0.00024140508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041711956,0.00018021322,0.00039067806,0.000025746387,0.00022380048,0.000022275864,0.00040254887,0.00018616751,0.0042458647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008574015,0.00022629273,0.00006607614,0.0000021066894,0.00031402375,0.00012574853,0.0001922534,0.00012944969,0.000004105575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.28067052,0.00015038945,0.000113969516,0.0010187486,0.00027604523,0.0018718306,0.117394306,0.000030568874,0.000021868773,0.31115216,0.14200975,0.14528982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019356258,0.00017007288,0.00009737211,0.00017807227,0.000070748,6.467104e-7,0.001350481,0.0000013933604,0.0000031566638,0.00018049877,0.99577874,0.00023322122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99958575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85376894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001734073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020393278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528653986","doi":"10.29173/alr441","title":"To Serve and Protect Whom? Proximity in Cases of Police Failure to Protect","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Statutory law; Plaintiff; Duty; Context (archaeology); Duty of care; Law; Order (exchange); Business; Duty to protect; Political science; Common law; Geography","score_opus":0.042174286070996554,"score_gpt":0.3443868178561022,"score_spread":0.30221253178510565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528653986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66229707,0.012978022,0.000038381368,0.29262134,0.00011651635,0.014436697,0.000018046116,0.000055055152,0.017438848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942416,0.0018227692,0.0003265469,0.0021965252,0.000057519475,0.00044373213,2.707758e-7,0.000010113333,0.0009009159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986472,0.00026793234,0.00028134385,0.00028735385,0.00022493435,0.00029123365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989924,0.0003952826,0.00007629712,0.000258407,0.00008711847,0.000190517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008343019,0.00011888504,0.0003487901,0.000029421344,0.00013860244,0.000030094881,0.00024469246,0.000052387153,0.000110221255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001509302,0.00007785845,0.000053243108,0.0003946707,0.00014908816,0.00027103384,0.000096011965,0.00005968209,0.00008105967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002621446,0.00041024943,0.017800717,0.02522216,0.000072620845,0.00005161211,0.035559434,8.84437e-7,0.0055128667,0.6518665,0.017875599,0.24536523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010035414,0.00019433432,0.00086124387,0.013983556,0.000028104549,0.000009167613,0.000112849564,7.4093755e-8,0.0007394904,0.00042142574,0.9833436,0.00020579757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35837534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71171045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.965468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005196694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010372049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64589727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528659496","doi":"10.3138/9781442620810","title":"Courted and Abandoned: Seduction in Canadian Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030263439910556033,"score_gpt":0.24741351914116017,"score_spread":0.21715007923060414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528659496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008900452,0.000013213914,0.000001984601,0.00078161014,0.0002687777,0.0005039459,0.00004174485,0.00007303798,0.9974256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21813497,0.52448756,0.00014266663,0.0005715469,0.0010371931,0.000005322474,0.00011760595,0.00009524633,0.25540787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841505,0.0001513645,0.00013770528,0.0004436003,0.0002863311,0.0005659719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992156,0.00008824062,0.00009847356,0.00019603045,0.000104256906,0.00029740823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029080067,0.00022779545,0.00028868395,0.007347606,0.0005480889,0.00009619306,0.00031568122,0.00042910347,0.00016032583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044458546,0.0002865553,0.000077569144,0.0020839637,0.0004273718,0.00046576484,0.000056799297,0.00041423348,0.000042363197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018389584,0.00016668749,0.00074864546,0.00033851896,0.00016215423,0.0027656043,0.10079948,0.000009202918,8.530677e-7,0.8127282,0.048716564,0.033380184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029750442,0.000037724472,0.000025405066,0.00016913554,0.00007697255,0.0000059010113,0.0011019811,0.000011192111,9.1579534e-7,0.000016575787,0.9979362,0.0003204963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99901813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94921964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020042579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029231473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529238904","doi":"","title":"Pulling the Ivy Out of the Windows: Presumptions of Privacy in the Home and R. v. Gomboc","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expectation of privacy; Charter; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Search and seizure; Privacy law; Power (physics); Sociology; Business; Political science; Privacy policy; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06641061789450314,"score_gpt":0.3639180378415194,"score_spread":0.29750741994701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529238904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738149,0.0030899893,0.0000052253445,0.021135923,0.0005491449,0.00014589244,0.00000337202,0.0000021293588,0.0012534151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796134,0.0015219875,0.00006160092,0.00009130994,0.00023586192,0.0000023809641,2.7049694e-8,0.0000033694914,0.00012211158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986732,0.00022654345,0.00038793051,0.00006618292,0.00049437647,0.0001517911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841523,0.0007764637,0.00039741775,0.00015978122,0.00022576649,0.000025368778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023106239,0.0000741117,0.00022809832,0.000034212666,0.00049649156,0.00004791555,0.00062509626,0.000034449145,0.000006369163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011448858,0.000031924395,0.00010634137,0.00016972735,0.0009936345,0.00024573048,0.00012916823,0.0004117176,5.594434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017268796,0.0003526049,0.20238495,0.00017045494,0.00036850807,0.00002330379,0.6933301,0.00013463924,0.007302935,0.08364086,0.0063877474,0.0057312176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000737999,0.0002750041,0.62111956,0.0006148124,0.0003826791,0.000055276832,0.15235351,0.000012784196,0.0007495091,0.015746664,0.20771943,0.00023279604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082122674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009308539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014870845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098077224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5194383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529395944","doi":"10.3138/9781442620889","title":"Canadian State Trials","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0834452761965339,"score_gpt":0.2817166087921418,"score_spread":0.19827133259560786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529395944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068230015,0.0020871724,0.000007788928,0.00011215861,0.0002602051,0.00033409355,0.00019370156,0.000034024306,0.99696404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002741675,0.0016029519,0.000079150355,0.000025120904,0.00014908287,1.5205208e-7,0.000007709941,0.000010579095,0.9978511],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986077,0.0002698458,0.0001859728,0.00024073765,0.00037046356,0.00032526004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872726,0.00021070727,0.0002756376,0.00025178195,0.0001551706,0.00037946808],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071792427,0.00015163729,0.000491921,0.000027600447,0.0004234503,0.000034199104,0.0006470214,0.0002750272,0.0024498308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008123453,0.00018921464,0.0002286021,0.0000011422435,0.00033544694,0.00014600935,0.0000671809,0.00013318869,0.000027027221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059979604,0.00001021774,0.0000031239035,0.00008576461,0.00014489779,0.00012019127,0.06356983,0.0000022885226,0.0000026356847,0.06266347,0.842246,0.031091634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013573954,0.000025624167,0.0000053084136,0.00012560365,0.00014309895,2.5427534e-7,0.0003447986,0.0000015575991,0.000003494055,0.00051322504,0.99851215,0.00018913718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99713963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1562662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018899326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014487453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529611183","doi":"10.71781/1864","title":"Surveillance électronique et métadonnées : vers une nouvelle conception constitutionnelle du droit à la vie privée au Canada?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0078529784796115,"score_gpt":0.20735558828813674,"score_spread":0.19950260980852524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529611183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6766891,0.008767803,0.00056256604,0.004869033,0.0036445227,0.00062898354,0.00017909624,0.00013695525,0.30452198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704206,0.0020411795,0.00015667682,0.00018985588,0.0005078751,0.000028771223,0.0005006212,0.000028801853,0.026125623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995704,0.00074530777,0.00054240506,0.0008198784,0.0013774214,0.00081098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707496,0.0004829446,0.00060087873,0.0003571683,0.00081720727,0.0006668218],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009558388,0.0005634351,0.00059903314,0.00014355633,0.010950808,0.000103493374,0.00065442757,0.0006338292,0.000092373375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032922544,0.0006978303,0.00028062958,0.00065948226,0.0017078888,0.0007217568,0.00013953015,0.000659265,0.000065719716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012189198,0.00033243833,0.035839666,0.00031967583,0.00039997228,0.002134362,0.14905277,0.011603369,0.0022098145,0.78126246,0.012611397,0.0030151675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012098093,0.00016092119,0.03645513,0.0005681065,0.0003197439,0.00040722732,0.16571811,0.000767457,0.0007750042,0.0012627272,0.79120517,0.0011506218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99594134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77999973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03143502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05015174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529611800","doi":"10.7202/1037538ar","title":"Le projet de loi no 49 et la responsabilité civile en cas de déversement d’hydrocarbures extracôtiers dans le golfe du Saint-Laurent","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.010049775735218014,"score_gpt":0.26938251019474063,"score_spread":0.2593327344595226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529611800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9084483,0.0010941902,0.009414851,0.040837407,0.00057610346,0.0005069548,0.000077498924,0.00012730612,0.038917385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096815,0.0012975711,0.0018862456,0.0009878377,0.0004699819,0.00009363724,0.0000059075874,0.000051453782,0.04423921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484783,0.0021584441,0.00044738295,0.0006499849,0.0006027981,0.0012935571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708354,0.0015991811,0.00018542558,0.00046543722,0.00009834105,0.00056804856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045316587,0.0003561155,0.00037683497,0.00010010866,0.0008123265,0.00015582866,0.0007475514,0.00064775115,0.00025793278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015278283,0.0003474039,0.00031025044,0.00029302886,0.0025695164,0.0004747865,0.0001186676,0.00058693695,0.00016982091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051851553,0.00055119966,0.026800815,0.00025375886,0.00016499156,0.00047940385,0.100532286,0.00023006332,0.016765328,0.80956197,0.017806865,0.026334798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008352949,0.00032481106,0.008437636,0.0004812523,0.0001726066,0.00010887511,0.026482118,0.00019329674,0.0034973756,0.023549266,0.9352295,0.0006880092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06091816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04321983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005375877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021088943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529761178","doi":"10.3138/9781442684119-007","title":"5. Reform of the Trial Courts in Quebec","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06122229047586671,"score_gpt":0.2800538037000476,"score_spread":0.2188315132241809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529761178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005250567,0.0004001767,0.000003131561,0.00004971033,0.00026567405,0.00036171163,0.000015076898,0.000009841633,0.99836963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01179122,0.00020928502,0.00003280779,0.000009612803,0.00009363498,7.532955e-8,8.4913637e-7,0.0000061470223,0.9878564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990556,0.00004151373,0.00016686936,0.00015579906,0.00042691742,0.00015325203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992354,0.000068684,0.00028131122,0.00025941673,0.00010135549,0.00005381628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037121747,0.00010605997,0.00025908393,0.00001664893,0.00013732453,0.0000070529127,0.0006095401,0.00027110273,0.00022318469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012829257,0.00009910274,0.00017729553,9.675265e-7,0.0006550353,0.00010683784,0.00015867733,0.0001382497,0.0000011740799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003243151,0.000022849777,0.0000032597043,0.000059871574,0.000036388512,0.000016980921,0.029968332,6.545355e-7,0.000007690859,0.95102227,0.0014679794,0.014150594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015126492,0.000045296714,0.000052860985,0.00024522396,0.000060755854,1.17938e-7,0.0011894695,4.2411762e-7,0.00002470676,0.00060820073,0.99615085,0.00010943722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97759444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99468285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079727947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002832244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40412927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529801733","doi":"10.7202/1068711ar","title":"BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES DROITS DES ENFANTS, CONNAÎTRE LES DROITS DE L’ENFANT : COMPRENDRE LA CONVENTION RELATIVE AUX DROITS DE L’ENFANT AU QUÉBEC, MONTRÉAL, LA COURTE ÉCHELLE, 2009","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Humanities; International law; Law; Art","score_opus":0.025591400024010075,"score_gpt":0.3169289891458682,"score_spread":0.29133758912185814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529801733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63613474,0.01290633,0.0065714037,0.02309981,0.0016847797,0.0006202989,0.00050957076,0.0002649876,0.3182081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365548,0.0077068075,0.0018005441,0.00061298383,0.0015916782,0.000065742424,0.00018120022,0.000081205035,0.051405028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422663,0.00090945116,0.0012321827,0.0010314216,0.0011792383,0.0014210483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995621,0.0014154366,0.0008009123,0.00042213837,0.0009431651,0.000797327],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022077805,0.0007268583,0.0007584739,0.00040087098,0.0011784614,0.0005297334,0.0015891113,0.00078345713,0.0010883261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001512266,0.0009113825,0.00067659194,0.00052941183,0.002005587,0.0016490984,0.00017617624,0.0011274768,0.00021563128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004293516,0.0009523723,0.012294844,0.00015382576,0.0005764087,0.0007817683,0.03634841,0.0010471549,0.00111101,0.89713836,0.0039432747,0.045223214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020639556,0.0004486432,0.062305406,0.0049485774,0.0006298007,0.0021368195,0.0056784726,0.019813616,0.00042996797,0.28854042,0.6114801,0.0015242129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43685085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35865247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60859793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060739787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028879193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531591372","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1437","title":"The Ideal Victim, the Hysterical Complainant, and the Disclosure of Confidential Records: The Implications of the Charter for Sexual Assault Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Compromise; Charter","score_opus":0.042410411089898396,"score_gpt":0.3055980323655133,"score_spread":0.2631876212756149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531591372","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059980765,0.0037631986,0.001578814,0.57828444,0.0022604316,0.002773577,0.00019391114,0.000035182264,0.3511297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808127,0.00025982174,0.000030606192,0.0005922964,0.0004993671,0.000037364738,5.580772e-7,0.0000098570345,0.0004888513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768215,0.000804759,0.00046694162,0.00014616763,0.0005655445,0.0003344456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996773,0.002020715,0.00045680892,0.00039766222,0.00028083404,0.000070988295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026910505,0.00012669218,0.00021385239,0.0000075504295,0.006686059,0.0003327915,0.0011440458,0.00007546822,0.000064079104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019458731,0.000044365213,0.00019982674,0.00012438606,0.0033324275,0.00017325551,0.00011940929,0.00043020773,0.0000032733644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077877594,0.000035129175,0.0003773725,0.000008580737,0.000057017965,3.934204e-7,0.0067926273,0.0000064436435,0.00010751923,0.9865824,0.004222263,0.0017323882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026559255,0.00042213808,0.016458847,0.00019710905,0.00074432825,0.0005768725,0.05204797,0.0008852173,0.00021375284,0.22581361,0.69956666,0.0004175728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026291542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.265869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002809589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004115325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535502015","doi":"","title":"Droit de la preuve appliqué au commerce électronique au Canada: droit civil / common law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.005659001118924552,"score_gpt":0.1922600511559521,"score_spread":0.18660105003702754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535502015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4744405,0.009467304,0.00060238916,0.0056303735,0.0008483411,0.00031534265,0.0000686694,0.00009586793,0.5085312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92882687,0.0002554165,0.00017441036,0.0004811447,0.0007422152,0.000017727456,0.000030212213,0.000023663079,0.06944837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964754,0.0006144817,0.00039069593,0.0005461435,0.0008651411,0.0011081643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809426,0.00056870666,0.00026536183,0.00038410383,0.00015214333,0.0005354129],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510625,0.0003689256,0.00040907084,0.000072015726,0.011287873,0.000094403375,0.0006916182,0.00045960085,0.00007664785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003436588,0.0004921656,0.00023892225,0.00039056732,0.0021858374,0.00055500166,0.00023842564,0.0006455799,0.00003119231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019018124,0.0002530982,0.022176148,0.00009489816,0.000094684125,0.0017402506,0.014525972,0.002659516,0.0007614308,0.94795024,0.008340157,0.0012134023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006314137,0.00010750875,0.044276815,0.00027536807,0.00033053083,0.00086027815,0.012121829,0.00058020203,0.0021018526,0.017172623,0.9208181,0.00072349265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99877185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9307776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06605408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015137564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536284630","doi":"","title":"La légitimité des modes amiables de prévention et de règlement des différends à l’ère du nouveau Code de procédure civile du Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Nouveaux cahiers du socialisme","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018175849684024865,"score_gpt":0.2923270333366779,"score_spread":0.27415118365265306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536284630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89535946,0.003705124,0.015598676,0.054281943,0.00071296626,0.00064738473,0.00029654297,0.00034781758,0.029050061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747165,0.008881175,0.0030692262,0.0014725355,0.0017873453,0.00028601688,0.000017409473,0.00010929487,0.00966052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937228,0.0020378325,0.0006660742,0.0007598508,0.0008544401,0.0019590093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967713,0.001286483,0.00042236032,0.00033532412,0.0004418916,0.00074268435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037791242,0.0006137699,0.0006347232,0.00014092583,0.0030215078,0.0004291907,0.00085356116,0.0010017111,0.0011856147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015671146,0.000569782,0.0005333175,0.0005546942,0.006836302,0.0013012247,0.00018479301,0.00057859905,0.000093144015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022338497,0.0009976821,0.0982898,0.00082851044,0.00030571086,0.00021942893,0.28560847,0.00021354899,0.003693125,0.54034305,0.041361574,0.027915718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030514277,0.0006677695,0.044784456,0.0033329332,0.0013407837,0.00022367405,0.10531801,0.0007801266,0.0029895643,0.117138654,0.7180026,0.0023699873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09372293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35409567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67664105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075426083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056172456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538167768","doi":"10.29173/alr451","title":"Alberta's Statutory Privacy Regime and its Impact on the Workplace","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Business; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Labour law; Privacy law; Public relations; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04004848864388003,"score_gpt":0.35439093381180903,"score_spread":0.314342445167929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538167768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03175375,0.120375045,0.000002398486,0.36837134,0.00030567448,0.0015062027,0.0000055874834,0.000043338936,0.47763667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81450224,0.12327811,0.000007045324,0.0075104577,0.00017414318,0.000047951427,9.0910197e-7,0.000018584762,0.054460585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983432,0.00042617452,0.00022201106,0.0002954583,0.0003127179,0.00040043084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995093,0.0041127843,0.00011995068,0.00041603236,0.000058668047,0.00019958435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000974014,0.00017628873,0.00028432542,0.000011090481,0.0004580531,0.00006838884,0.0004263838,0.000060690767,0.00152176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019055218,0.000079558515,0.00013048503,0.0001681689,0.00027717356,0.0003362466,0.0000752722,0.00010874944,0.0010360782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017464617,0.000020383615,0.00018272424,0.00017702214,0.000022451517,0.0000024553572,0.0008561551,3.516431e-8,0.000014430336,0.9282229,0.060779944,0.009704066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067409426,0.00004941795,0.00022411166,0.0043029133,0.000053058917,0.0000038259805,0.000023017954,3.3255765e-7,0.000016889107,0.0010486748,0.99405926,0.0001510591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03321603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022391045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93327934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008331301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011664081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538751486","doi":"","title":"Ontario’s Green Energy and Green Economy Act: Why a Well-Intentioned Law is Mired in Controversy and Opposed by Rural Communities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable energy law and policy review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Energy (signal processing); Natural resource economics; Political science; Energy law; Economy; Economics; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Environmental law","score_opus":0.033756444204371315,"score_gpt":0.30446141338821164,"score_spread":0.27070496918384035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538751486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012664181,0.16779163,0.000017317689,0.11519185,0.00017512144,0.00043059813,0.00006494163,0.00005854598,0.70360583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6441443,0.28279793,0.000020085845,0.03932569,0.0002686718,0.000051264713,0.00003084919,0.000018416287,0.03334281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986746,0.00025118986,0.0003280038,0.0002049407,0.00013519629,0.0004061183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894595,0.00013061409,0.00021194552,0.0003930211,0.000059211554,0.00025927144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043305935,0.00022607263,0.0005717282,0.000042998774,0.0013397343,0.00035597113,0.0003454798,0.0001220637,0.00017132735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018548246,0.00021124563,0.00007952639,0.00005683118,0.0008905795,0.0007502008,0.00018318146,0.00008114967,0.0000014967414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005001524,0.000037920992,0.0010858725,0.0005372917,0.000060185783,0.0000062543977,0.0027802489,3.7728515e-7,0.000023792916,0.96719813,0.01347602,0.014743886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005333854,0.00005169016,0.00009305287,0.0011306416,0.00006168033,0.000009070572,0.00054055173,0.000009289463,0.000031210715,0.012554325,0.9847405,0.00024462573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99659973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010445375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015473216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539311535","doi":"10.29173/alr455","title":"Who Controls the Past Now Controls the Future: Counter-Terrorism, Data Mining and Privacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Counter terrorism; Charter; Politics; Computer security; Internet privacy; Business; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04947851111280584,"score_gpt":0.34041903120508055,"score_spread":0.2909405200922747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539311535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004305938,0.2999741,0.000057177804,0.67037725,0.000632947,0.0016748029,0.00003754408,0.000030778912,0.022909423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6465489,0.3149493,0.000039920382,0.030612595,0.0021600423,0.0001222872,0.000009706704,0.00002677509,0.00553047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788636,0.00056076923,0.00036495863,0.00039024904,0.0003920767,0.0004055837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953555,0.003058196,0.00021360737,0.0011652156,0.000087423854,0.00012008449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223755,0.00018449676,0.00042101918,0.000006342936,0.00084939203,0.00021202293,0.0015565627,0.00006187407,0.00024619084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007576773,0.00007545381,0.000087013694,0.00012395192,0.0007224487,0.0006019126,0.00031041386,0.00010630057,0.00012387267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057328914,0.000048931885,0.0032473663,0.0007503512,0.00016666933,0.000011178601,0.0045868224,1.76045e-8,0.00005510396,0.35216808,0.37184498,0.26706314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024034489,0.000024327208,0.00027904045,0.0023289174,0.00020614028,0.000009402487,0.0003046207,0.0000040589675,7.7057325e-7,0.00020073933,0.996263,0.00013861289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004000516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052719682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64224297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027192978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007171753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9645657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548911607","doi":"","title":"Minding the Gap: Why and How Nova Scotia Should Enact a New Cyber-safety Act — Case Comment on Crouch v. Snell","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Law; Political science; Computer security; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science; Aeronautics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.07372683352904794,"score_gpt":0.3096898517758798,"score_spread":0.23596301824683188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548911607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29695866,0.0010218242,0.0000908655,0.694251,0.00032238083,0.00012204005,0.000011282789,0.000011155501,0.007210797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959531,0.00013633483,0.00006782158,0.0033472832,0.0001456146,3.6339335e-7,1.0311099e-7,0.000006634639,0.00034274868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991561,0.00007136073,0.0001509345,0.00013251501,0.0001223078,0.00036674243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989402,0.00026110033,0.00012838001,0.00013930793,0.000078213234,0.00045279114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057201885,0.00010467421,0.00017940583,0.00016334179,0.0006145947,0.000115033225,0.0002511084,0.00016735923,0.00012497285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023973847,0.00006182493,0.000038303853,0.00015566644,0.000927368,0.00018111177,0.000022889246,0.00025964875,0.000004651743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045336375,0.000014474078,0.00805459,0.000010574977,0.00006406437,0.0036572325,0.003234704,2.946826e-7,0.0002749025,0.84018713,0.056858163,0.08759855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034623762,0.00023084324,0.00012566037,0.0001699098,0.0000386232,0.0022249774,0.002536527,4.5618052e-7,0.00037966314,0.006523951,0.9873068,0.000116392075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11178006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75822014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9304486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001613597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005043225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8941347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549338198","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2997","title":"Equality Before the Law? Evaluating Criminal Case Outcomes in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Adjudication; Conviction; Premise; Normative; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Representation (politics); Criminal justice; Criminal Conviction; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.10838694095173472,"score_gpt":0.3910181827780401,"score_spread":0.2826312418263054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549338198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7287121,0.00017061568,0.00009726978,0.04967345,0.0009914897,0.00021534237,0.000019913297,0.000021625643,0.22009821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774206,0.000016662452,0.00018772682,0.0011558931,0.00033538733,0.000006239402,2.1381979e-7,0.000009813169,0.0005460252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709606,0.00075099844,0.00044494067,0.00019110285,0.0009186647,0.0005982452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985635,0.0006036881,0.00020094727,0.00021546536,0.00016584787,0.0002505347],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036753856,0.00014128344,0.00022027075,0.000019311718,0.0019374973,0.00016908423,0.00046407306,0.00005631048,0.0004914522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005212662,0.00007535544,0.00009759274,0.00009273414,0.00033486076,0.00045250042,0.00007109574,0.000331819,0.000017994467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002202917,0.000027207363,0.025439274,0.0000097467255,0.000017461467,0.0013174517,0.006006228,0.000010851465,0.000026056285,0.9521429,0.0003184492,0.014662326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004564617,0.0007520655,0.06437197,0.0014934061,0.0006388183,0.012159086,0.27747083,0.0002318812,0.00041623495,0.5422364,0.09365368,0.002011006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99874616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40990654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009905606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550209800","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869613","title":"Code is Law, But Law is Increasingly Determining the Ethics of Code: A Comment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0502243919787117,"score_gpt":0.3533770688665483,"score_spread":0.3031526768878366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550209800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55443317,0.0022794912,0.004754416,0.36024863,0.00068952306,0.000426467,0.00002731216,0.00007899618,0.07706203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863629,0.0013411811,0.000085809515,0.011346056,0.0003175855,0.000002292089,5.300844e-7,0.000012910733,0.0005307498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967484,0.0006774016,0.00031937132,0.00015821183,0.0007124524,0.0013841651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984117,0.0007728218,0.0002632531,0.00020085603,0.00024347399,0.000107899665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086452635,0.0001229418,0.00020157022,0.000024888652,0.0016803382,0.00013578897,0.0006358673,0.00013572506,0.00005449983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037889215,0.00009154802,0.0001300296,0.000116805575,0.0006267627,0.00020980346,0.00006561033,0.001991687,0.000017153687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111811,0.00003639152,0.0008004514,0.000007712163,0.000036132937,5.5906133e-7,0.012050003,0.0000016038707,0.00006248834,0.9824063,0.0007168461,0.0038503464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049332046,0.00045552562,0.00017996218,0.0001351598,0.00011989363,0.00005630215,0.015736131,0.00010333244,0.00064673513,0.3452373,0.6366022,0.00023409672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013013272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0835143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.637169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004388451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001379996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553346101","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter and Criminal Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Arbitrariness; Duty; Discretion; Politics; Panacea (medicine); Criminal justice; Criminal law; Doctrine","score_opus":0.02044072827461811,"score_gpt":0.29721199263953385,"score_spread":0.2767712643649157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553346101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5160466,0.013729166,0.0012886564,0.3944179,0.0019130228,0.00030310877,0.0000044122944,0.00005678606,0.07224034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98001415,0.010379752,0.0000070298897,0.0002468771,0.0006134204,0.0000016879515,4.5747953e-8,0.0000050135695,0.008732038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975988,0.0001084027,0.00009995711,0.00009446866,0.00023083118,0.0018674949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993973,0.0001708424,0.00004307901,0.00007246296,0.00008024414,0.00023609505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002539343,0.00006039524,0.000053817323,0.000032227326,0.002965316,0.00018258543,0.0002374681,0.00004447779,0.000043707412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027015852,0.000032139196,0.000031323863,0.000055092463,0.0002911315,0.00021584966,0.000011560955,0.00042787762,0.00005623564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001257627,0.000002328934,0.00036902277,0.0000014102541,0.000011366011,0.0000036854676,0.0015882748,2.4730443e-8,0.00003591139,0.8986424,0.0007362604,0.09859671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023262827,0.0001476286,0.0018745358,0.000036213154,0.00015293474,0.00027367246,0.03160168,0.000001739418,0.00001288028,0.2649161,0.7005792,0.00017074973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08812208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96596307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009357969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004423381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553369501","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869304","title":"A Comparative Overview of Victimss Rights, Enforcement Mechanisms and Redress (2013) in England and Wales and the American Federal Jurisdiction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Jurisdiction; Download; Enforcement; Political science; New england; Internet privacy; Business; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023326895805446737,"score_gpt":0.31385792070632323,"score_spread":0.2905310249008765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553369501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98962873,0.006698985,0.00035371401,0.00255337,0.000037002814,0.00023011003,6.380408e-7,0.0000048200864,0.000492639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651499,0.034572337,0.000056153578,0.00004332339,0.00005249274,0.000009285692,2.872309e-7,0.0000026336634,0.000113588874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863756,0.0002927343,0.00018985475,0.000116427065,0.00020140925,0.0005620076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952114,0.000144373,0.00017132075,0.000046931316,0.000053936503,0.00006232836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015404387,0.00008460937,0.00023400945,0.00004467392,0.00047001077,0.000104527855,0.00008348217,0.000024963805,0.00001734541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016091377,0.00005356545,0.000023364915,0.00008855394,0.0005102262,0.00025165672,0.000029983627,0.00037301995,8.5816924e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029136575,0.00003137682,0.0023319519,0.000015327425,0.00007312298,0.0000010137009,0.034080837,0.0000048123893,0.00014382167,0.946942,0.00004168496,0.016042706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002434835,0.00079773733,0.015734075,0.00013290548,0.00007250604,0.00012460619,0.04392161,0.0005980507,0.00009252076,0.9288295,0.0070353537,0.00022631578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041480668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11159732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070116654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013913332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019966271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9649022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554322188","doi":"","title":"Posturing, Tinkering and Reforming the Law of Negligence - a Canadian Perspective?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Law; Tort reform; Project commissioning; Political science; Law reform; Liability; Common law; Perspective (graphical); Publishing","score_opus":0.04385904964817727,"score_gpt":0.2452122505781492,"score_spread":0.20135320092997191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554322188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73551434,0.0017441522,0.0000756255,0.010592255,0.0001252598,0.000104388004,0.000008819825,0.000013745843,0.25182143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982607,0.00030066483,0.00025528154,0.000050459155,0.000077466044,6.329237e-9,4.7318075e-8,0.0000024313913,0.0010529949],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938506,0.00006089748,0.000080739155,0.00008208675,0.00019464007,0.00019656579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943805,0.00003699972,0.0001075298,0.000075048345,0.000107547145,0.00023480435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027109394,0.00005276706,0.000095580035,0.000040628773,0.0014881764,0.000031155243,0.00028203026,0.00003990134,0.0001680605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033369797,0.000046700894,0.000054998985,0.00008377095,0.00060371635,0.00025472525,0.000040858376,0.00015209151,0.0000037739494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019657524,0.000012685217,0.0026367952,0.000012357261,0.000036745216,0.00007515142,0.5215649,0.000024244577,0.00009935426,0.47224241,0.00040388774,0.002871819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029117594,0.000085131374,0.0026872319,0.00022573212,0.000077957746,0.000076979566,0.79614943,0.00003982126,0.000066668974,0.003284338,0.19684507,0.00017048836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81587774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86305726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46895805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014141887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098381985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555650109","doi":"","title":"Criminal Justice and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Charter; Law; Legislation; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Politics","score_opus":0.027377853820953497,"score_gpt":0.29373267886491566,"score_spread":0.2663548250439622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555650109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386273,0.0112258205,0.00021208721,0.02095402,0.0004182531,0.00017898847,0.0000020831587,0.000009698997,0.028371764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778914,0.0009256204,0.000022713975,0.00012389923,0.00031656653,0.0000010362144,1.499516e-7,0.0000030607762,0.00081781956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850106,0.0001512595,0.00012076866,0.000082041995,0.00025514062,0.0008897282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994092,0.00008807794,0.00006579411,0.000060234357,0.00012256383,0.00025411928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032439767,0.000059958882,0.000106595755,0.00004495742,0.0007510618,0.000084330735,0.00016127987,0.000045644952,0.000012018305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001697818,0.000038250768,0.00002542479,0.00006622351,0.0007043001,0.00017331193,0.000014174786,0.000496526,0.0000041464864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000608723,0.000004706845,0.00023844253,0.000005168127,0.000017656954,0.000003010799,0.0163437,5.7919584e-7,0.0000034792129,0.9808839,0.00043824548,0.0020002641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012312671,0.0002321807,0.0006968457,0.000031863594,0.0004944111,0.0003787622,0.06688212,0.000049178612,0.000009682367,0.89589185,0.033952978,0.00014889656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5033336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9484909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44515732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029933493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028105164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5776636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557202064","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1323","title":"Towards a Public Law of Privacy: Meeting the Big Data Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law enforcement; Jurisprudence; Privacy law; Information privacy law; Law; Information privacy; Political science; Data Protection Act 1998; Supreme court; State (computer science); Privacy laws of the United States; Relevance (law); Privacy by Design; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.4180145909454242,"score_gpt":0.4069288338756114,"score_spread":0.011085757069812796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557202064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032341064,0.3289817,0.000039884268,0.19198796,0.00065289036,0.00078753656,0.00003121018,0.0000818795,0.47711354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875992,0.10801629,0.00023831459,0.0031748249,0.0006852672,0.00002847034,0.000020750396,0.000017372055,0.00021955489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974256,0.0005715443,0.0004212975,0.0003198306,0.0008834994,0.00037821752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777627,0.00018091165,0.00020337816,0.0012372,0.00038812394,0.00021413722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069995,0.00013567886,0.0003841138,0.000012123579,0.00036742803,0.0000954108,0.0021455728,0.00006164671,0.00010788156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018819432,0.0000907765,0.00009557013,0.00029023923,0.0006555191,0.00052705756,0.0006532505,0.0001597242,0.000084631094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034895709,0.000050864877,0.000037722548,0.00090491254,0.000022910546,0.0000036463464,0.0018983885,1.09678126e-7,0.0000030595652,0.9317695,0.029466726,0.035838682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067768866,0.000028054868,0.0000073040706,0.0017793512,0.00008778858,0.0000021398453,0.00045236739,0.0000051036723,0.0000052755863,0.0041870284,0.99326175,0.00011609283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02060426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036312092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005612763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005151483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559824207","doi":"10.71781/2138","title":"La protection de l'environnement par les sanctions administratives pécuniaires au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; China Scholarship Council; Hydro-Québec; Government of Canada; Autorité des Marchés Financiers","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020596512412398262,"score_gpt":0.23652303697195118,"score_spread":0.2159265245595529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559824207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8986161,0.010799914,0.00027575772,0.0035990605,0.00096313044,0.00050668325,0.00004093999,0.00011050876,0.085087955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94423264,0.00057798345,0.00031563785,0.000031084375,0.00042256457,0.00009221364,0.000085835374,0.000023168932,0.054218885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693686,0.0006682288,0.0003953865,0.00060066377,0.0008453315,0.0005535234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827474,0.00018964546,0.00044041013,0.00026880307,0.00029578852,0.0005306009],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005735562,0.0004281726,0.0003550519,0.0001725688,0.01966858,0.00009714253,0.0004187733,0.00061667967,0.00012696198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000203306,0.000500298,0.00030795034,0.00034114713,0.0015008334,0.00057629193,0.000092629205,0.0005687168,0.000092064365],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017406797,0.0011732535,0.07668545,0.00058500696,0.0007105229,0.0016489626,0.71159387,0.0032697518,0.010671192,0.12822196,0.0022072617,0.061492067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004838584,0.0002871602,0.13514279,0.0005160819,0.00059657544,0.00032009266,0.37962186,0.0002978156,0.0019548957,0.0006231649,0.47949773,0.00065797055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8816539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8727079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47729048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02161239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014111206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561087","doi":"10.29173/alr177","title":"What has Dunsmuir Taught?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05356113111974656,"score_gpt":0.3567823824491154,"score_spread":0.30322125132936883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008824846,0.15032092,0.0000043457194,0.3272703,0.0048452644,0.000997253,0.0000013291898,0.00009557405,0.5076402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5600877,0.3700093,0.00029456138,0.030304777,0.0011317695,0.000091732036,0.000010724116,0.000032393655,0.038037065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987949,0.000119126984,0.00022755304,0.00024055222,0.00029684816,0.0003210321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887365,0.00039710567,0.00007723768,0.00038245335,0.00008030876,0.0001892684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075057347,0.0001150332,0.00025169193,0.000009089178,0.00057801185,0.0003185073,0.00043192998,0.000079482495,0.0035901817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004538947,0.00009433248,0.00013332009,0.00018750386,0.0005057636,0.0009897,0.000048725484,0.0002070043,0.0020194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012357294,0.000022075481,0.00006014616,0.00031605156,0.0000059134645,0.0000042847983,0.0009360719,1.3305424e-8,0.00004220433,0.9461444,0.03421569,0.018251928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003063251,0.000009185384,0.00002666639,0.0014814447,0.000049190458,0.0000053746826,0.00010379985,3.37093e-7,0.000027049302,0.00180309,0.9963256,0.00013764622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04285403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.359968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9621099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001523926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010525026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562298834","doi":"","title":"Ответственность за убийство по уголовному кодексу Канады","year":2008,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.11263651762826267,"score_gpt":0.3457000944602312,"score_spread":0.23306357683196854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562298834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45197514,0.029201405,0.0011338667,0.037065625,0.024087269,0.006876926,0.0023028825,0.0037849387,0.44357195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828792,0.010704117,0.0014497279,0.0058467425,0.00822518,0.00036219123,0.00025541437,0.0006604965,0.089616925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730877,0.0025385383,0.0047572274,0.005273428,0.0065519195,0.0077911294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98418176,0.0024007391,0.0025007476,0.0047231633,0.0017903129,0.0044033015],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049386933,0.0037488912,0.004101081,0.0014187546,0.008376673,0.0012586978,0.0066489493,0.0029504437,0.01184085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032100384,0.004016688,0.002778438,0.0054575023,0.007212313,0.0039532646,0.0021414764,0.00410652,0.024484394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024025016,0.00644298,0.03884485,0.0018917962,0.0017651514,0.006303072,0.10102834,0.00039726763,0.0053199013,0.060122136,0.6992349,0.076247096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003903278,0.0014459289,0.029861558,0.0012470166,0.0011162073,0.0011435469,0.015419221,0.00041907237,0.002895356,0.0043310598,0.93229496,0.005922794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017287793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005562291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43090406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002089178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044921576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563272628","doi":"10.21991/c9t96s","title":"Trial Lawyers of British Columbia v British Columbia: Section 96 Comes to the Access to Civil Justice Debate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Autonomy; Habeas corpus; Sociology","score_opus":0.034974618822124756,"score_gpt":0.30304966708798214,"score_spread":0.2680750482658574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563272628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60150415,0.0009184871,0.12689821,0.101884924,0.030210178,0.008969068,0.005313333,0.0007681607,0.123533465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777413,0.00018424554,0.00027042784,0.0028117574,0.000874295,0.00031553407,0.000022372304,0.000014128204,0.0077330773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960821,0.00024720363,0.000807406,0.0007239588,0.0011082763,0.0010310105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971339,0.0007056044,0.00026353865,0.00040981756,0.0009325412,0.0005545762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012557923,0.00019317192,0.00047124134,0.00008556351,0.004022782,0.0019159352,0.0011085898,0.00025580497,0.0016280274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002906304,0.0002700683,0.00028696549,0.0009234513,0.0058147833,0.0014623627,0.0004094621,0.00022332075,0.00019168644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006868425,0.00022973103,0.027959872,0.000050277682,0.000098919045,0.00006585301,0.00019728074,0.00019802594,0.00012991592,0.16938213,0.787323,0.013678157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060096923,0.00025072784,0.0065282,0.0010137958,0.00021909429,0.000262947,0.0028452459,0.000009391596,0.000019391755,0.0065614334,0.97566545,0.00061463524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32574195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96451557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050017337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024000555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564128943","doi":"","title":"Teisiniai lyginamieji lygtinio paleidimo iš pataisos įstaigų aspektai","year":2006,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Political science; Quality (philosophy); Economic Justice; Process (computing); Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.018953986799077033,"score_gpt":0.3008439083473893,"score_spread":0.28188992154831227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564128943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6066549,0.01137865,0.00046374582,0.030037478,0.0064260345,0.0017895192,0.00025979485,0.0008165662,0.34217334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521206,0.0010232141,0.00049368705,0.0007637841,0.0048166653,0.00006129851,0.00004951698,0.000102569014,0.04056867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916493,0.00067882537,0.0014062641,0.0015602361,0.0024088477,0.0022964708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960779,0.000748318,0.0006762607,0.0012822297,0.0005518891,0.00066340715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002175726,0.00089836784,0.0010036423,0.0002754808,0.0019686096,0.00092346634,0.0018477666,0.00082855887,0.0032531088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053674844,0.0009161769,0.0006537662,0.0014950326,0.0013844684,0.0012628911,0.00045101286,0.00094237714,0.0062859217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000386778,0.0022607732,0.0839952,0.00078553765,0.00021318451,0.0018277657,0.016107595,0.00014552468,0.0022999058,0.15861309,0.7011829,0.03218177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077735854,0.0004227051,0.053163305,0.00046337093,0.00035614936,0.000042717675,0.0053478875,0.00012867562,0.0007747493,0.009127631,0.9278524,0.0015430682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04208356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016605694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34546572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068939227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011247441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564725354","doi":"","title":"수사와 기소 기능분리의 원칙과 한계","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"경찰학연구","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Quarter (Canadian coin); Filter (signal processing); Public prosecutor; Service (business); Criminology; Business; Sociology; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.07475471664815504,"score_gpt":0.3673692487097122,"score_spread":0.2926145320615572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564725354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63389885,0.0075256093,0.000045566147,0.015910842,0.005640059,0.0002999959,0.00001742179,0.00013121578,0.33653042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715946,0.00054301025,0.00013879097,0.00069835933,0.002748657,0.000007311964,0.000002336742,0.000015177794,0.024251789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978959,0.00017809738,0.00023732793,0.00024798606,0.00054673787,0.0008939446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989141,0.00020403409,0.00009950698,0.00029338474,0.00006731246,0.00042166113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009946411,0.00017339199,0.0002167359,0.0000371107,0.0006007898,0.00012614887,0.00042337526,0.00018242378,0.004009029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024535356,0.00016526766,0.00014313495,0.0002886852,0.00034228637,0.0006264904,0.00011562526,0.00021682089,0.0072944015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008608267,0.00072764605,0.22223943,0.00023839783,0.00009443729,0.000041895677,0.12091014,0.0000033553724,0.0010724185,0.36431906,0.22130214,0.06896502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119386175,0.00006060797,0.03194122,0.000091291084,0.00008806902,0.000004900863,0.006251487,0.000008560496,0.00035922992,0.0017096635,0.95902854,0.00033704273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059198835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012118163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7377264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001269754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011686399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567059005","doi":"","title":"The accused's right to be present: a key to meaningful participation in the criminal process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Fair trial; Right to a fair trial; Criminal court; Criminal trial; Criminal procedure; Key (lock); Process (computing); International law; Computer security","score_opus":0.13665797964209617,"score_gpt":0.41582747773424333,"score_spread":0.2791694980921472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567059005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7514404,0.00052773155,0.00050965545,0.12541799,0.00022271328,0.0003325822,0.000015859394,0.000007859978,0.12152519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773896,0.00001863403,0.00013003204,0.0008093398,0.00050742255,0.000016121852,3.9935935e-7,0.0000033139204,0.0007757846],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860436,0.00020811814,0.00031375466,0.00010554448,0.0005795487,0.00018867324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998862,0.00040191202,0.00015687729,0.000069058864,0.00039632237,0.000113791066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010010393,0.00008275841,0.00012334487,0.000055085242,0.00053303706,0.00026309863,0.00058405596,0.000023368686,0.00008361915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018823017,0.000046279565,0.000046544123,0.0001572075,0.00016005305,0.0003077722,0.000038106427,0.00015338355,0.00004721385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004571521,0.00018346602,0.0005759475,0.0000038327835,0.00004520916,0.0000085397405,0.78737617,0.0009949087,0.000087200955,0.200953,0.0065171705,0.0027973887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019259687,0.0001558115,0.000835839,0.000059148773,0.000024669129,0.00000719159,0.096661024,0.0001708233,0.00019099309,0.0044311257,0.8971787,0.00009208927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024727103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008372185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89066154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064021944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000414068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46718755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567143047","doi":"","title":"Lygtinio paleidimo paskirtis baudžiamojoje teisėje","year":2003,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Prison; Law and economics; Generalization; Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03436080647523355,"score_gpt":0.32130157242637053,"score_spread":0.286940765951137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567143047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37912858,0.011631661,0.00044502108,0.016575947,0.0090033505,0.0013520818,0.000075867596,0.00047504605,0.5813124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599797,0.0026374315,0.0007365616,0.0011796227,0.0013872087,0.00004451984,0.0000058277155,0.000070169976,0.033958927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326205,0.0010256359,0.0009780718,0.001178997,0.0017618019,0.0017934482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966586,0.0007123399,0.00042845495,0.0009962565,0.0003424199,0.00086188095],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025861484,0.00064414646,0.0007510745,0.00016988875,0.0015768469,0.0005474143,0.0011618772,0.00063665264,0.0077912915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018177631,0.0006528667,0.00052052573,0.0012537374,0.0009563316,0.0008070814,0.00016596579,0.0007688638,0.0069852583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016137617,0.001333954,0.047032315,0.000570833,0.00030098247,0.0011385282,0.05225831,0.00003917161,0.0017756983,0.41194013,0.4482355,0.035213202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047060632,0.00025156658,0.005944835,0.0002659029,0.0002095812,0.0000424019,0.008242709,0.000018139379,0.0013605303,0.004522185,0.9777071,0.00096443645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003522987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032267475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58085114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003790212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010491371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570247237","doi":"10.5596/c16-021","title":"Medically Assisted Death in Canada – Unsettled (and Unsettling?) Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008527495730996275,"score_gpt":0.2613907718901916,"score_spread":0.25286327615919535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570247237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49848005,0.018147435,0.00011193893,0.47533357,0.0027950334,0.0003671412,0.00029481997,0.000023369472,0.0044466634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713722,0.007881302,0.00035730633,0.018914536,0.00093102123,0.0000025701127,0.0000013859301,0.000020430205,0.00051927724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921189,0.003731403,0.0010999218,0.00015640125,0.0016111829,0.0012821832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995084,0.00529828,0.0023598487,0.00012567702,0.00059560715,0.0016697783],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010402903,0.00019393266,0.00048552072,0.00017091967,0.0015516098,0.00073223794,0.00064713514,0.00032785186,0.00018351378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012920174,0.00014540342,0.00012886837,0.00041936326,0.0001015687,0.0008766937,0.000035047513,0.0009616314,4.9769847e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003406239,0.000014488504,0.6915135,0.00001815633,0.00010890333,0.0002158618,0.0023173622,0.000027482112,0.000008595996,0.009780751,0.29442134,0.0015395478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007131972,0.000038060753,0.4105802,0.00034645462,0.00004386374,0.00024160638,0.0012108716,0.000024706478,0.000017992634,0.006113444,0.58046556,0.00020403485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47289214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08859526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16967794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572592180","doi":"10.32920/29936543","title":"Demonstrations and the Law: Patterns of Law's Negative Effects on the Ground and the Practical Implications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.040538349047345636,"score_gpt":0.3773111344270751,"score_spread":0.33677278537972943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572592180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12013968,0.00008496918,0.0010454151,0.5662426,0.000052745163,0.00073828624,0.0000039162196,0.000014112314,0.31167832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553275,0.000104195125,0.000050347488,0.0036584237,0.000029200823,0.0000654929,2.102699e-7,0.0000012407781,0.0005581533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914515,0.00047329912,0.0000932954,0.00009304584,0.000108644024,0.000086577355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987007,0.012741913,0.000039703842,0.00014159232,0.000048363185,0.000021378057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008478368,0.000046018235,0.00007899497,0.0000065108025,0.0011719431,0.00012862856,0.0001133204,0.000026795004,0.000016237798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007046909,0.000018467472,0.00002829343,0.00007756167,0.0018866162,0.000111483576,0.00004297381,0.000103225684,0.0000018167157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002930818,0.000010155931,0.00033259866,0.000004895153,0.000013566388,8.752242e-8,0.0045765867,1.2971583e-7,0.000009755074,0.99431854,0.00027297428,0.00043136952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008981961,0.00004496013,0.03192948,0.00006820396,0.00017182644,0.0000026745606,0.021282172,0.00006873036,0.0004131315,0.9312869,0.013753373,0.00008037195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018932415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029583126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87539303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009058902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048391554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98812443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573131317","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Research Manual: Ontario Statutes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3445844152168141,"score_gpt":0.5415079563397083,"score_spread":0.19692354112289417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573131317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066557026,0.0014899671,0.000014613953,0.042752326,0.0019196541,0.0008016584,0.00005770049,0.00017920058,0.9521193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004974571,0.0040930677,0.0005456035,0.00027794007,0.0050674076,0.000121084384,0.000038872062,0.00006804029,0.9848134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98582345,0.002851688,0.0006852926,0.0011702176,0.006668761,0.0028006127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934716,0.005749578,0.00010994558,0.0010546335,0.003097829,0.0006408529],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02662223,0.00034464573,0.0005524167,0.00094904064,0.003368926,0.0013861202,0.0028848476,0.0009297289,0.025162313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037228016,0.0002574368,0.00022642469,0.00092652446,0.0037942822,0.00094182073,0.000975598,0.0030660175,0.004599588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036241283,0.000036081954,0.00011450178,0.00006258884,0.000023398234,0.00010337636,0.0051412447,5.94188e-8,0.0000069815287,0.20798655,0.7819734,0.004515522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099900244,0.00017026022,0.000103693754,0.0007141735,0.000012871816,0.00000272595,0.012862704,1.5775343e-7,0.000046102272,0.022980949,0.9626404,0.0003660391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93149865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.960556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1850056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030833283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012366442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575313095","doi":"10.1504/ijhrcs.2016.079632","title":"Monetising constitutional rights: the award of damages in constitutional claims","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Redress; Law; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.06256506241237965,"score_gpt":0.3813605190712536,"score_spread":0.318795456658874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575313095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910836,0.011804618,0.011188676,0.04257411,0.0054834,0.00048521053,0.00022684796,0.00003765002,0.037115905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981833,0.00050936,0.00019827689,0.00009331542,0.00060889265,0.000004660731,0.0000019248737,0.0000015165136,0.00039875833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976909,0.00015567576,0.0007272487,0.00017799331,0.0010405988,0.00020754008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973012,0.00085612346,0.00042505987,0.00007576414,0.0012568712,0.00008497348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010154283,0.00015230566,0.0003123991,0.00022100228,0.001055153,0.00006544971,0.00044796529,0.000066833585,0.00017342185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023242705,0.0000789626,0.00013294371,0.00010274515,0.03945405,0.0006284905,0.000098626755,0.00016891907,0.000006688943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007598053,0.00007876415,0.0060486477,0.000005173721,0.00023741653,0.00009538174,0.0007471864,0.00002530052,0.00035334914,0.99021256,0.0017207953,0.00039942507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001747,0.00011894079,0.0069430983,0.001366288,0.00009127103,0.00036858482,0.0012508945,0.0000027094081,0.0005352671,0.6195611,0.36774507,0.00026981343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029137637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000877264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3706515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025188294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043915692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580276317","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttw250","title":"Using Social Insurance numbers for identification purposes: Canadian perspective on legal and privacy risks","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Business; Perspective (graphical); Social insurance; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Actuarial science; Finance; Internet privacy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12724727448177497,"score_gpt":0.41775356483750825,"score_spread":0.2905062903557333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580276317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97291785,0.00014676897,0.00018469822,0.01332633,0.0003961,0.00059404265,0.00011723099,0.000055204084,0.012261798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798596,0.00006629843,0.00017292566,0.00013950517,0.00043349425,0.000029313416,0.0000012865664,0.000014308678,0.0011569143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987556,0.000106227395,0.00016824016,0.00032547177,0.0002458485,0.00039861063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992382,0.00018620702,0.000100424615,0.00012052817,0.00017443059,0.00018019258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045246643,0.000120651704,0.00015513488,0.00008968592,0.0012128064,0.00018179607,0.00021167044,0.00010721068,0.00006444383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004629928,0.000100929305,0.000065787055,0.0001166348,0.00037329827,0.00057124265,0.000016477132,0.00006794065,0.000021502383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003160877,0.000080713886,0.02461751,0.000059223625,0.00007093469,0.000013378769,0.07905818,0.0000068692952,0.0014499363,0.8170186,0.003918237,0.073390305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021793344,0.0002905012,0.3682292,0.00043633138,0.00024463303,0.000016217058,0.087182045,0.000101141835,0.0019705503,0.06480591,0.47302744,0.0015166852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39173004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36357728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7522127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007166543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004253364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93280494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581992304","doi":"","title":"Omnibus Bills: Constitutional Constraints and Legislative Liberations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Separation of powers; Legislature; House of Commons; Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics; Judicial deference; Legislation; Doctrine; Law and economics; Judicial review; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.02276897726288724,"score_gpt":0.30467975851094264,"score_spread":0.2819107812480554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581992304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2643794,0.00878959,0.2747174,0.16663562,0.0016437345,0.0006861172,0.000054854907,0.00020169374,0.2828916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990866,0.0046662493,0.00010830367,0.00010222426,0.00035274943,0.000002727343,4.0779614e-7,0.000003173293,0.0038981822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982897,0.0001275361,0.00014989248,0.00013139128,0.00025115657,0.0010503139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938595,0.00023745427,0.000073790594,0.000050953222,0.0001285782,0.00012324296],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013987592,0.000075034775,0.00008984427,0.00005036316,0.0009297357,0.00008344379,0.000119572454,0.000053847823,0.00025114638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039059998,0.000050661914,0.000042832246,0.000088687564,0.0029907338,0.00049885595,0.000015885858,0.0003684556,0.000048316975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008953015,0.000011889385,0.0010952797,4.6951115e-7,0.000024477742,0.0000025831848,0.0011013385,3.7083134e-7,0.00020686885,0.96948534,0.00022911135,0.027833296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059634814,0.00014342845,0.00056406995,0.00007808324,0.000036779707,0.00044838295,0.00964442,0.0000020211778,0.000050334063,0.86583054,0.1223991,0.0002064711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019379903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039374917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72648656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004631131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044580763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W258366820","doi":"","title":"'Denying Justice': Does the Tort of Negligent Investigation Go Far Enough?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Duty; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Conviction; Plaintiff; Political science; Duty of care; Liability","score_opus":0.03543966414883289,"score_gpt":0.30260863191779114,"score_spread":0.26716896776895827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W258366820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98229384,0.0032949648,0.0007762426,0.009518173,0.00049104495,0.00013338545,7.0355014e-7,0.00002243659,0.0034691852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825009,0.014086966,0.000057785288,0.0001580668,0.00066195347,0.0000026427515,4.2901817e-7,0.00000693562,0.0025242968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978069,0.00019376038,0.00025468742,0.000112309746,0.000558107,0.0010742577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932635,0.00012840364,0.00019212753,0.00011477878,0.0001514956,0.00008686477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022545261,0.00008268822,0.000115918454,0.00003892,0.0014047008,0.00003775929,0.0003680767,0.00006044879,0.00004097959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032871688,0.000051050833,0.00008885979,0.00019199678,0.0003577589,0.00027792357,0.000024673725,0.00075339805,0.000018123805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042298954,0.00004466054,0.012667508,0.000019282108,0.00007856833,0.000009067852,0.03367008,0.000085929234,0.0019302361,0.93753713,0.00085730373,0.0130579425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006903184,0.0006622822,0.01850047,0.00018458346,0.0005883523,0.0007433434,0.20738417,0.000097318276,0.0032460205,0.54613405,0.22107577,0.0006933436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025281124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011775957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39140308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000502846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030834423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586512860","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Legal Research Manual: WestlawNext Canada & Lexis Advance Quicklaw","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20420700723952837,"score_gpt":0.5089320897582671,"score_spread":0.30472508251873875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586512860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014218685,0.0044787717,0.000013770126,0.08051427,0.00209059,0.0008152004,0.000119397555,0.00014475807,0.91168106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009800102,0.00687236,0.0003160115,0.00085698906,0.005718955,0.00013431697,0.00002960995,0.00010302201,0.97616863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835188,0.0024856045,0.00087281945,0.0014490734,0.008422325,0.0032514236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98795855,0.0059973756,0.00017442509,0.001393969,0.00353595,0.00093974883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015620266,0.00046254077,0.00069929555,0.0005528587,0.0039032653,0.0007932687,0.0036642745,0.00076331047,0.0074366583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045650783,0.00037208752,0.00018232853,0.0012055062,0.0037275364,0.0009665728,0.00091454707,0.0025276328,0.0016484963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031741176,0.000016496866,0.000016607257,0.00009951209,0.000016715894,0.00018702997,0.0005057838,3.5887902e-7,0.000008101821,0.3035553,0.69014364,0.005418704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010977241,0.00011375043,0.000021622203,0.0009166367,0.000011208765,0.000006061434,0.0089210365,4.9331794e-7,0.00006945278,0.014166122,0.97514725,0.0005165998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99208474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2893892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034032874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587453561","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006032","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Law edited by François Tanguay-Renaud and James Stribopoulos Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing Ltd, 2012. ISBN 978-1-84946-010-1. xii + 321 pp.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Publishing; Law; Subject matter; Queen (butterfly); Index (typography); German; Sociology; Political science; History; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.029609670987713454,"score_gpt":0.2849894635113597,"score_spread":0.25537979252364623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587453561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59702903,0.03524801,0.00013619907,0.33867612,0.00084641244,0.0007284442,0.00030312486,0.000016539174,0.027016101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551004,0.00090989086,0.00032577678,0.0025736857,0.00048194345,0.000005504342,0.000010402479,0.000015420037,0.00016730664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770534,0.00028222965,0.0005280589,0.00031362876,0.00065249094,0.0005182356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972407,0.0006215204,0.00031652141,0.00015923932,0.00059592404,0.0010660713],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018619099,0.00022609608,0.00033603367,0.00023048364,0.00077639055,0.0013265895,0.0007447496,0.00019944823,0.00035982585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051336084,0.00019063866,0.00007315343,0.00026235176,0.0017964519,0.003982971,0.000025956017,0.000627791,7.888788e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029065846,0.000016254313,0.0022423195,0.000027268137,0.000043061726,0.00009807138,0.050707646,0.000002514024,0.00005496861,0.93447673,0.011305556,0.000996518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014481944,0.00032555626,0.012106645,0.0008625522,0.00023687599,0.0006016687,0.059824523,0.000036638507,0.000076179684,0.46074858,0.46300498,0.0007275958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7028163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9314522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47372815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023209747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016119748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587900814","doi":"","title":"Loosening the Law's Bite: Law, Fact, and Expert Evidence in R v JA and R v NS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Status quo; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Rules of evidence; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06039795706589633,"score_gpt":0.36650891274634095,"score_spread":0.3061109556804446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587900814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197529,0.032982193,0.00012349959,0.036251348,0.00020706035,0.00015548692,4.7369747e-7,0.000016835404,0.010510225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711622,0.027352117,0.000024518335,0.00032520934,0.00029421903,0.0000031200375,5.2521326e-8,0.0000066932867,0.0008318534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979934,0.00016880821,0.00015717186,0.00017608129,0.0002862611,0.001218264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992899,0.00025856865,0.00013213842,0.00017900803,0.000041864925,0.000098561606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032432552,0.000098521865,0.00012952532,0.000025695179,0.0028221095,0.0006444969,0.00045963528,0.000060796137,0.000013662507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040048716,0.00006998481,0.000036025605,0.000043874996,0.0007513481,0.0009906945,0.00009440491,0.00090610114,0.000004658305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003590278,0.000011298474,0.0074986997,0.0000040617165,0.0000143829475,0.000013010139,0.009861708,9.510563e-7,0.00029392823,0.95111156,0.00004739505,0.031107105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010641383,0.0005233066,0.020633103,0.0009297973,0.00007860972,0.0007806349,0.088593595,0.00009778641,0.00030096984,0.71094996,0.17528641,0.00076167635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028322663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25209883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24016158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023273155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588436416","doi":"","title":"Disenfranchisement as Punishment: European Court of Human Rights, UK and Canadian Responses to Prisoner Voting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Voting; European union; European Union law; Convention; Parliament; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.065308629649263,"score_gpt":0.35823655440416263,"score_spread":0.29292792475489965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588436416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79747057,0.00004629618,0.000046783003,0.0064098253,0.000053694068,0.00043131012,0.00009181617,0.00001454467,0.19543515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926315,0.0000649388,0.00061592564,0.000022134112,0.00007267418,5.925974e-7,0.000012855037,0.000011279589,0.006568094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969401,0.00068190886,0.00021053315,0.00042985287,0.0009939929,0.00074362155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977048,0.00023918232,0.00019675485,0.00051759346,0.0003149579,0.0010266977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030055805,0.00013850245,0.00028009075,0.00044134964,0.0057322816,0.00011363669,0.0012410787,0.00005119045,0.0006484366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055256824,0.00015627213,0.00009876221,0.00016404269,0.0026132567,0.00035431221,0.00065364403,0.0003199775,0.000069419504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012458477,0.0004397428,0.26309356,0.00035721864,0.00032348494,0.0027409082,0.2114135,0.000008348715,0.008783786,0.42146575,0.07475212,0.0153757315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009448852,0.0010434134,0.69016975,0.0007020182,0.00007961555,0.000008290646,0.05080142,0.000041250936,0.00038288438,0.008701799,0.2465602,0.00056449673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7721367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8231905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42707616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009587864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005315058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99556214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588661555","doi":"","title":"The Evolution and Reform of Summary Trials in Canadian Military Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.015243780546323565,"score_gpt":0.2543765170753396,"score_spread":0.23913273652901604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588661555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2612359,0.0023603917,0.0000049849186,0.21317852,0.0015836343,0.0011542835,0.00028576487,0.00009933073,0.5200972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5984482,0.012174575,0.0000768411,0.000045716075,0.00017055373,0.0000012237942,0.000101459715,0.000017305747,0.3889641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823225,0.0006424076,0.00023021254,0.0002510068,0.00025937107,0.00038472825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984941,0.000793908,0.00019401916,0.00019419419,0.00006513745,0.00025864967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008287462,0.0001450277,0.0003493278,0.00030744972,0.00075693225,0.000030082312,0.0004212741,0.00030146434,0.00008300742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045084322,0.0001162323,0.00010951397,0.0003415039,0.00025766992,0.0010687619,0.000041512118,0.00020039505,0.0000072741336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022737498,0.00006480097,0.015819548,0.0009216765,0.00014635595,0.00020839277,0.023688149,0.0000027891083,0.000019438252,0.53726554,0.4132026,0.0063869404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033081826,0.0000714753,0.043322213,0.0008527831,0.00025787202,7.540115e-8,0.1740724,8.5307215e-7,0.00006989088,0.0028892376,0.7777761,0.0003562693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9571528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5343763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008145003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023688455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5821787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588787282","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1339","title":"\"Chartering\" in the Shadow of Lochner: Guindon, Goodwin and the Criminal-Administrative Distinction at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Administrative law; Statutory law; Shadow (psychology); State (computer science); Criminal law; Power (physics); Psychology","score_opus":0.054096900128114064,"score_gpt":0.3226209074071395,"score_spread":0.2685240072790254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588787282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21057165,0.13921094,0.00015764292,0.5409196,0.00097315124,0.005776117,0.00028086206,0.000045473083,0.10206457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813344,0.016951308,0.00000864776,0.0010353508,0.00007800078,0.000057581707,0.0000021287997,0.0000071362742,0.0005254345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973996,0.00083697797,0.00053164654,0.0002308989,0.00070069084,0.00030014507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977813,0.0012086513,0.0002972641,0.00045195755,0.00019832396,0.000062539475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035876385,0.00015934752,0.0004130275,0.000010343852,0.00043638088,0.000026886477,0.0006186241,0.000044545362,0.000303224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006629353,0.00006586264,0.000106324485,0.00018988406,0.001625513,0.00014325598,0.00009701067,0.00011984485,0.0000041538383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037781158,0.00012451506,0.0036518932,0.0032712445,0.0000879513,0.000023539902,0.014297944,0.0000014062181,0.0005333599,0.897667,0.06789675,0.012066591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007004919,0.00014467411,0.006374696,0.0052093416,0.00039456013,0.000029312112,0.0045567555,0.0000061276746,0.00039160685,0.0032960237,0.9786183,0.0002780695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36129025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89899945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012730283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039152338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.642963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588847849","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4376","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 225 RE-EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE: THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF CROWN-POLICE ALIGNMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Plea; Windsor; Warrant; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.15238276535311923,"score_gpt":0.44048746539275985,"score_spread":0.2881047000396406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588847849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87113184,0.0010624272,0.00067452027,0.0069120787,0.0012369592,0.002076938,0.00002710981,0.000114341594,0.116763815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952462,0.00010445697,0.0010161594,0.0007045723,0.0011695337,0.000082733524,0.0000018644129,0.000035077777,0.0016394006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955286,0.00042298363,0.00077001314,0.00042127163,0.0019017919,0.00095537404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712044,0.000760187,0.00062954065,0.00060222344,0.0005270437,0.00036059073],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004344322,0.000274864,0.00042684414,0.00018006317,0.0007086739,0.0002936436,0.0024487188,0.00018923452,0.0016453558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006887459,0.00022587512,0.00013806924,0.0007750814,0.00042589524,0.0025217067,0.0008561158,0.00035307193,0.000107298125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014005725,0.0020163956,0.20007837,0.0059383907,0.0006875064,0.000015607307,0.5585271,0.007152461,0.021062044,0.06517019,0.08136933,0.05658199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031708383,0.0012146434,0.37511292,0.005382299,0.006609632,0.000022968006,0.2706247,0.00060468825,0.058773924,0.0027222277,0.27162498,0.004136187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011448359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012059617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28790244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001252715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040224244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590945711","doi":"","title":"Telus: Asking the Right Questions About General Warrants","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Statutory law; Law and economics; Law; Limiting; Point (geometry); Political science; Business; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021561184179729388,"score_gpt":0.2988212752063284,"score_spread":0.277260091026599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590945711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6342689,0.0017834294,0.00029025882,0.033570804,0.0017371059,0.00078428106,0.000011082121,0.00033235224,0.32722178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805686,0.00014675397,0.0005427029,0.002047973,0.0012547858,0.000075984215,0.0000025734016,0.000013843342,0.015346779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828035,0.0002694691,0.00022971866,0.00023000613,0.00047242054,0.00051804184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896806,0.00019646842,0.00007597967,0.000352911,0.00014461677,0.0002619371],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678725,0.00013656398,0.0001491243,0.000024374262,0.0019899048,0.0004833677,0.0006012273,0.000105074316,0.0038967556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002975463,0.00009545968,0.00010247326,0.00021578725,0.0004975427,0.0007463105,0.00007363461,0.0002851115,0.003007657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005929205,0.000053168777,0.0034067973,0.000012580957,0.000022956634,0.000010819168,0.0046380046,0.000041682615,0.0007366705,0.9307898,0.05590491,0.0043766676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001257795,0.000021153204,0.014616073,0.000089324414,0.0000288435,0.00000490426,0.0014113792,0.00006627333,0.00022176426,0.023133075,0.960036,0.00024546843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08403062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009764978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013455987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591041822","doi":"","title":"Une malheureuse célébration de la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne par la Cour suprême du Canada: l'arrêt Chaoulli","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0053224407382736335,"score_gpt":0.1929465265155906,"score_spread":0.18762408577731698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591041822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87134576,0.013346385,0.00048262853,0.0128192175,0.0005132525,0.00018839035,0.00006457532,0.00008906173,0.10115075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537756,0.001783122,0.0005486912,0.00027775587,0.00052392355,0.000011995845,0.000025650283,0.000024150737,0.043029115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663156,0.0012118521,0.00028930543,0.0004594294,0.00071008655,0.00069778756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.00080069446,0.00020850882,0.000232251,0.00019650547,0.00044146128],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011337938,0.0003258525,0.00028956283,0.00009634071,0.006836485,0.00019526968,0.00043194828,0.00042716676,0.00007487337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019036661,0.0003985515,0.00018370786,0.0004503767,0.001960168,0.0008175182,0.00011976516,0.00045272062,0.000021781458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028865278,0.00041434486,0.05347908,0.00013365204,0.00014062795,0.008909526,0.069212504,0.005294507,0.007199557,0.83546805,0.017728023,0.0017314603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093721756,0.00009037766,0.17485432,0.00031609242,0.00034435312,0.002951635,0.021249672,0.0018794027,0.0016409326,0.006434142,0.7886306,0.00067122804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9755057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9003154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8290339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077339862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006610082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591742251","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1472","title":"Distorting the Prosecution Process: Informers, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, and Wrongful Convictions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Law; Prison; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.025094286748516083,"score_gpt":0.315542606470057,"score_spread":0.2904483197215409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591742251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2318608,0.002169805,0.0008680321,0.019122308,0.0011296032,0.00044164385,0.000006418808,0.00009951526,0.74430186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973673,0.0009744008,0.00007704953,0.00032039807,0.00051073264,0.000008952447,0.000001514723,0.00000649882,0.0007331193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869055,0.00010550364,0.00027821903,0.00013793305,0.00043698464,0.00035083326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926776,0.00008872977,0.00021194972,0.000091525326,0.00015377121,0.00018624007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010469529,0.000101809084,0.00010961631,0.000028083592,0.0034515061,0.0003397519,0.00022453001,0.000066706074,0.00014530768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014011162,0.00007224846,0.000055971992,0.0001377115,0.000594004,0.000856879,0.000029137038,0.00031620168,0.000018189203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014605414,0.00015463962,0.06694572,0.00007547119,0.00008266763,0.000106885615,0.046448663,0.000049215632,0.00017623475,0.8571318,0.00487649,0.02380621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006897561,0.00020575056,0.0115842065,0.00036129443,0.0001766813,0.0010107962,0.13295302,0.00025085988,0.000054301803,0.04957241,0.8026194,0.00052152504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013578371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12212682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8075594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009413796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001416463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592778477","doi":"","title":"Réflexions venues d'ailleurs: comparaison entre les droits du dommage corporel québécois et français","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gazette du palais: Recueil bimestral","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.03148408365774839,"score_gpt":0.28689284130022785,"score_spread":0.25540875764247944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592778477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76186675,0.009868669,0.00020296629,0.1892336,0.003774013,0.0005208892,0.00041742768,0.00031980046,0.03379591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785872,0.006681252,0.00034149288,0.0013448811,0.0021455537,0.000050663697,0.000035564906,0.000075107826,0.0107382685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949431,0.00089735736,0.000818491,0.0009563982,0.00092038896,0.0014642732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970453,0.00094207167,0.0004529858,0.0006165385,0.00025196734,0.00069114903],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001028133,0.0006722229,0.00076339376,0.00015128817,0.0011116693,0.00025925547,0.0009995295,0.00053923693,0.001979244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044708877,0.0005771217,0.0005507435,0.00062354567,0.002397175,0.0011199272,0.00018664045,0.000579134,0.002728418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035888428,0.0010403413,0.22447732,0.00026071997,0.00030425165,0.00086131494,0.054097,0.000028750354,0.0014774989,0.3448884,0.27123433,0.100971185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001083346,0.000329448,0.08937513,0.0014253195,0.00024991497,0.000099397395,0.0027526345,0.000031480027,0.000345448,0.004235028,0.89916384,0.0009090215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08202251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034878977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6279295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027872864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070711685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592872947","doi":"","title":"L’Alter Ego Code de procédure civile du Québec : complément jurisprudence et doctrine","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02878190209511188,"score_gpt":0.3306087828680942,"score_spread":0.3018268807729823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592872947","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090545274,0.0025697013,0.010649149,0.4718655,0.0014182162,0.0005312751,0.000016253825,0.00020232602,0.42220232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138915,0.0006080226,0.0010698505,0.006065822,0.0011328203,0.000029563149,0.000002220954,0.000016272592,0.07718394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974431,0.00045354993,0.00034427017,0.0004420486,0.0005569475,0.00076010934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985231,0.00052637345,0.00012446954,0.0003074783,0.00014487795,0.00037368407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016719042,0.0002404077,0.00029191712,0.000035799367,0.0004979028,0.00017234895,0.0005719315,0.00014546062,0.006995623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023778898,0.00021846416,0.00013285037,0.00025142782,0.0006959109,0.0004561864,0.000169447,0.0002823182,0.0016406347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003971816,0.00032892526,0.021806156,0.00019631539,0.000025816691,0.000021256606,0.010830948,0.00012399707,0.0002069585,0.7238675,0.22271572,0.019836713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021122771,0.00019277353,0.0064452607,0.00019958407,0.00005987313,0.000020614865,0.0008177503,0.0012577843,0.00044533116,0.0019481722,0.98808926,0.0003123504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25389993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6153355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8233462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040750616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085125526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594526090","doi":"","title":"Self-governing Codifications of English Criminal Law and Empire: The Queensland and Canadian Examples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Politics; Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Sociology","score_opus":0.03147503646858546,"score_gpt":0.25830422925128205,"score_spread":0.2268291927826966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594526090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86392933,0.0010411373,0.00013253535,0.0036465828,0.00010985652,0.00012230348,0.000023202329,0.000012552204,0.13098253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856967,0.0007468889,0.00029984294,0.00011929978,0.00011663562,2.4588381e-8,7.0332305e-7,0.0000029055334,0.00014405682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991818,0.0001714786,0.000121492616,0.00008449466,0.00022544255,0.00021525707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886596,0.00045244454,0.00013806947,0.00010105303,0.00025424862,0.00018824756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016536094,0.00006478138,0.00011568624,0.000032638487,0.002620045,0.00005404287,0.00024221887,0.000053752672,0.00004285378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008963143,0.00004633126,0.00003815175,0.00007983346,0.0012318788,0.00018151966,0.0000331742,0.0001996603,8.476058e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103146915,0.000024252375,0.023462402,0.00003986184,0.000074674834,0.000032042455,0.23490897,0.0000068722347,0.000018704126,0.7384593,0.0019826263,0.00088716863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003629781,0.00006249464,0.05620947,0.00008320793,0.00023653849,0.000045113018,0.15636456,0.000011334786,0.00003451919,0.0016423485,0.78482455,0.00012285449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57000434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9149869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7828419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049557642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001473919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594803311","doi":"","title":"Moteurs de recherche, déréférencement, oubli et vie privée en droit québécois","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15535014985927173,"score_gpt":0.42733608590397665,"score_spread":0.2719859360447049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594803311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104311615,0.03432151,0.015046764,0.59034437,0.0025557387,0.0008443207,0.000032861833,0.00034299042,0.25219986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8140803,0.032821838,0.001893195,0.0027435238,0.0013299315,0.000050334547,0.0000034352852,0.00004578091,0.1470317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947408,0.0020695124,0.00039278372,0.0006139786,0.0005366927,0.0016462309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974259,0.0014580638,0.00017795662,0.00047077355,0.00011093431,0.00035634844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046627927,0.00029347013,0.00032326355,0.00006607872,0.00032696803,0.0001193458,0.0009109577,0.0005547939,0.0016120377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013227764,0.00025543524,0.0002069346,0.0005767933,0.00059898227,0.00072102074,0.00013117888,0.0007841961,0.0009740322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007603846,0.00017468765,0.00061612105,0.000043253487,0.00006229634,0.000012202925,0.004774102,0.00000261107,0.0062111393,0.77532035,0.021985179,0.19072203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029333518,0.00041656496,0.00046621627,0.00026224373,0.0000876746,0.000012128169,0.0004223909,0.000019893734,0.0022733598,0.12551437,0.86986274,0.00036907318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03874736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116939485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84787756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031351706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039378735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595711559","doi":"","title":"Guides thématiques: Droit canadien et québécois: Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034707715261496845,"score_gpt":0.3373364054441613,"score_spread":0.3026286901826645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595711559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00589938,0.00867211,0.0006308872,0.12837525,0.004509388,0.00065424095,0.00022488565,0.0003109473,0.8507229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0963739,0.03265398,0.002689579,0.009591759,0.003948889,0.000120694516,0.000034263685,0.000117165924,0.8544698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937735,0.00077998586,0.0011812416,0.0012061674,0.0014267873,0.0016323037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951822,0.0018591755,0.0006013758,0.0009178186,0.00058887765,0.000850565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024654763,0.0007915913,0.0009943089,0.00019619615,0.00092371204,0.00038673735,0.002318117,0.00097580155,0.008702152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014929413,0.0006395586,0.00046390804,0.0005240725,0.0019516702,0.001437004,0.0003426906,0.0006856896,0.00288034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010247021,0.000038619335,0.0003537778,0.00021957346,0.00006511145,0.00014140793,0.011162314,0.0000014148262,0.000016498774,0.585318,0.3888845,0.013788471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110124136,0.00017044642,0.00037447546,0.0026751596,0.0001591964,0.00004369926,0.006351166,0.000008839406,0.000083675695,0.036959343,0.9520948,0.0009690662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87924397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94969225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5632103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001570927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004665621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596434462","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2016.20740","title":"Étude franco-canadienne du principe légaliste : le processus qualitatif et interprétatif du texte pénal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Legislator; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Legislation; History","score_opus":0.02902429272706703,"score_gpt":0.3096303512717241,"score_spread":0.2806060585446571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596434462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121728,0.00013972493,0.011183338,0.029891703,0.00060674455,0.00022149799,0.000047378096,0.00010852454,0.045628313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991853,0.00014519878,0.000679954,0.0006088879,0.0005721371,0.000057022346,0.0000094380175,0.000019599469,0.0060547465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822605,0.00020065755,0.00040148434,0.00035241165,0.0003862822,0.000433093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980769,0.00087125564,0.00021384597,0.00019762098,0.00039145298,0.00024888737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013231974,0.00015156099,0.00023658856,0.00011156299,0.00026990497,0.00013557424,0.0007468009,0.00007161698,0.0004169114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013720627,0.00014524176,0.00012240365,0.0001569718,0.00026589708,0.0005264281,0.00009032704,0.00013473493,0.00024621614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008348318,0.0001649982,0.041058786,0.00007407929,0.000066287044,0.00007473907,0.031295575,0.00006860882,0.00047551244,0.9086491,0.0029892446,0.014999602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011394508,0.00013388756,0.10436444,0.0013298093,0.00004724072,0.000117521544,0.0054592015,0.0012665561,0.00038585646,0.07159969,0.8134348,0.0007215698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02061186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13327731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83704937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000563051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036504577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596939739","doi":"","title":"The Law Union of Ontario Brief to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-51","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; National security; Public administration; Legislation","score_opus":0.1038717309274204,"score_gpt":0.3356494534749983,"score_spread":0.2317777225475779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596939739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08489357,0.000027099557,0.00004656408,0.14905757,0.00023756667,0.00021656275,0.000008150806,0.000019174662,0.76549375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504703,0.00001316157,0.000018159275,0.0013840892,0.00007367906,0.0000021862138,0.000001084146,0.0000020354835,0.0034585558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885064,0.00018154967,0.000110853034,0.000104344035,0.0006091428,0.00014346903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.0005138529,0.00003833778,0.000107420754,0.00017760585,0.00009900242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028523258,0.000049862636,0.00006340156,0.000015916628,0.0008112598,0.0001236402,0.00020567991,0.000030814757,0.00005176219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036513337,0.000023740837,0.000020231693,0.000120142904,0.00022614509,0.00013645313,0.00005404238,0.000100879675,0.000010888825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044516848,0.0000165714,0.0008484539,7.777643e-7,0.0000031448246,1.4591186e-7,0.010568991,0.000007448167,8.886857e-7,0.97660226,0.011336873,0.00056990946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090988346,0.000103793696,0.0022566512,0.00001248295,0.0000024961964,2.8452217e-7,0.0046281544,0.000009931511,0.000019691353,0.026263932,0.96656734,0.000044242996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2574527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8817314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039231565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033378354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74749196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597316920","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Conviction and Perceptions of the Canadian Criminal Justice System: Interviews with Community Members","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Criminal justice; Criminology; Perception; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminal Conviction; Law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.07116009076056408,"score_gpt":0.33380311438425053,"score_spread":0.26264302362368647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597316920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8160445,0.000053660322,0.00005629432,0.000927958,0.00027774123,0.00012772053,0.00000325687,0.000012532506,0.18249635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985153,0.000012504426,0.000093717026,0.00014505489,0.00005859974,0.0000044967887,6.3362864e-7,0.0000024956416,0.0011671982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916357,0.00038471972,0.00009060777,0.0000426311,0.00014363325,0.00017484865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947417,0.00008370776,0.000041146282,0.00013980747,0.00009314942,0.0001679934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085046067,0.000047401227,0.00007239609,0.000023622822,0.0013972529,0.000031754742,0.00014584593,0.00003821659,0.00027093387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052712425,0.000029675712,0.000019033216,0.000116866824,0.00041136908,0.00021971004,0.00002573042,0.00013577344,0.000008840677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038529604,0.00009109853,0.106472045,0.001251825,0.000031885487,6.4593826e-7,0.5711451,0.000008100879,0.00010627161,0.31300107,0.005802874,0.002050543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006374805,0.000038450053,0.120061375,0.00015591906,0.00044475225,0.000014303392,0.8591308,0.000021314972,0.000017151442,0.000013188285,0.019954149,0.00008482391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92847717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98965764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3129879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016353109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001367944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599540835","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869326","title":"Victim Impact Statements at Sentencing: The Relevance of Ancillary Harm","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Harm; Criminology; Sentencing guidelines; Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Law; Psychology; Computer science; Sentence","score_opus":0.021959984172440637,"score_gpt":0.36692199519070906,"score_spread":0.3449620110182684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599540835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99176544,0.0012379417,0.00021947216,0.0039340747,0.00043505177,0.0001114942,0.0000026171558,0.000014749083,0.0022791557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921579,0.0056740977,0.000031025615,0.00008300192,0.00034544303,0.0000017056627,5.8719036e-7,0.000009347344,0.0016969447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973606,0.00012763185,0.00025206475,0.00012759551,0.00056689314,0.0015652305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991486,0.00015476509,0.00023700984,0.00017296421,0.0001747592,0.000111921705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036292954,0.00010073665,0.00013058922,0.00003450392,0.00086783705,0.00004790094,0.0004551401,0.000056892535,0.00019375667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037826074,0.00006532962,0.00013410948,0.00017754416,0.00030269992,0.0003645299,0.000049289396,0.0012831856,0.0000323069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010859041,0.00048413622,0.15502872,0.000057951976,0.0009010771,0.00005066467,0.05866243,0.0002125869,0.14005356,0.49255577,0.012086668,0.13882053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018929353,0.0016370909,0.02304427,0.00017427209,0.00030906624,0.0011211933,0.12194155,0.00017949833,0.0052705337,0.41939738,0.42400372,0.0010284799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027670607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043871876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41191706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084597286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024682493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599611594","doi":"","title":"Leaving Dumb Phones Behind: A Commentary on the Warrantless Searches of Smartphone Data Granted in R. v. Fearon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Charter; Supreme court; Warrant; Law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Element (criminal law); Statute; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Dissent; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.1420565112009654,"score_gpt":0.3509380723470759,"score_spread":0.2088815611461105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599611594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94232136,0.0005920611,0.000014723576,0.048482727,0.00039912143,0.00037129543,0.00006240153,0.000046176185,0.0077101057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997137,0.0001175345,0.00012214856,0.0018423456,0.00026221276,0.0000123846075,0.000028808898,0.0000132828345,0.0004642575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765354,0.0006006032,0.0002855163,0.00032222926,0.0007320611,0.00040607402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983393,0.00058878853,0.00009565685,0.0006939058,0.00008190504,0.00020044642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031978246,0.00013546465,0.00024250435,0.00005123319,0.00037130012,0.00009690532,0.0011708889,0.000079691985,0.00017794958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006354416,0.00010374704,0.000047487167,0.00025384614,0.0005730517,0.0005121699,0.0003135389,0.00036924405,0.000119451724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001973146,0.0018477213,0.1414276,0.00033617814,0.00018741653,0.0002439672,0.1344475,0.00018950988,0.0068178633,0.099140614,0.5982463,0.015142221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037517338,0.00064439315,0.035484236,0.0023332646,0.00013821798,0.000011127002,0.14384028,0.00063446036,0.01103565,0.014900985,0.7858908,0.001334839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18668897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22623497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18764456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012003253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017285686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81872696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600341827","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4852","title":"THE IDEA OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE: REFLECTIONS ON NEW ZEALAND’S ACCIDENT COMPENSATION (OR PERSONAL INJURY) SYSTEM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17549995626458265,"score_gpt":0.45649297266376465,"score_spread":0.280993016399182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600341827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7798103,0.00012117235,0.0011935931,0.063871294,0.005947709,0.0030496952,0.00006864765,0.00019861327,0.14573894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907383,0.00005514097,0.00019607492,0.00045335427,0.0010512501,0.000033565084,0.0000012505096,0.000018355764,0.0074527217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778754,0.00014756946,0.0004434427,0.00034276413,0.0008850193,0.0003936537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758977,0.0006266975,0.00047489698,0.0005941824,0.00039635948,0.0003180977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009333982,0.00016988961,0.0002995412,0.00013942321,0.0018184095,0.0009885107,0.0021808844,0.0001059604,0.0001242485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019625365,0.00013004431,0.00009501171,0.00027358782,0.00020761191,0.0009348532,0.00039726787,0.00018271062,0.00010006053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013537007,0.0007436341,0.03098731,0.0030215965,0.00049181824,0.00007329967,0.104009725,0.0027213788,0.0069916537,0.19788295,0.5824895,0.057050105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014576691,0.0016799335,0.59413177,0.003919076,0.002856309,0.000010514948,0.0438357,0.00028649258,0.007961961,0.0007513108,0.3418342,0.0012750603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018760124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016539847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56314445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020972006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051296357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601240183","doi":"","title":"Informing the Future of End-of-Life Care in Canada: Lessons from the Quebec Legislative Experience","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Autonomy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Politics; Legislature; Right to life; Law; Public administration; Humanities; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.018062679284181597,"score_gpt":0.2964679113254858,"score_spread":0.2784052320413042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601240183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95006675,0.012897915,0.00014230965,0.03486717,0.00030002225,0.00010881236,0.000011634946,0.000003014658,0.0016023559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955779,0.003768548,0.000005973973,0.0000997005,0.00032840492,0.000003488417,2.6347513e-7,0.0000036571098,0.00021209512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981794,0.0001809296,0.0002550917,0.00008805275,0.00045735785,0.0008391823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989722,0.00050495,0.00022560143,0.00013409811,0.00011256868,0.000050577815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085227273,0.000076166936,0.00013660853,0.000018274437,0.00036106442,0.000017893259,0.0006174831,0.000036881465,0.000052924566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023329882,0.000035343255,0.000055994646,0.00016970212,0.00030274087,0.0002844174,0.0000369289,0.00050933973,8.225358e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007624902,0.00000808158,0.038594868,0.0000030232727,0.000039754508,0.0000023282262,0.19255586,0.000010492344,0.00018422985,0.4661832,0.00018346643,0.30215845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023862674,0.000042834596,0.017415844,0.00012572586,0.000015283213,0.000004409898,0.8861439,0.0000014989095,0.00018967869,0.01235995,0.08335795,0.00010425947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98804617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018582713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032500714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97298414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602532921","doi":"10.11575/prism/30035","title":"Mandatory Minimum Sentences: Reforming Canada's Sentencing Practices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04986321669837596,"score_gpt":0.27141528204655696,"score_spread":0.221552065348181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602532921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8805403,0.00040140483,0.003656524,0.010215362,0.00048943347,0.00016399524,5.7329487e-7,0.00005462376,0.10447774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98614985,0.0001738413,0.0057442295,0.00017151194,0.0000592214,1.6352098e-7,0.0000030686,0.000005922933,0.0076921987],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878263,0.00011448615,0.00009413157,0.0001764178,0.0005857903,0.0002465413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903584,0.000109019355,0.0002904051,0.00013920787,0.00016763287,0.00025790083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006497108,0.00007182292,0.00014053615,0.000048654223,0.00041889044,0.000015952182,0.00036483127,0.00006089855,0.000073385076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036538305,0.000082810766,0.000042991265,0.00013464215,0.0002481388,0.0006170469,0.00010021719,0.00011666146,0.000012864693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007702414,0.0003233727,0.08390069,0.0003727427,0.00025589543,0.0020051727,0.26077372,0.0000059672634,0.0010823539,0.020101724,0.20535102,0.42505708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033761133,0.000051940242,0.0027561134,0.0000926845,0.0000727336,0.0000060323655,0.15103896,0.001179166,0.0000652712,0.00035676835,0.8438178,0.00022497133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9689736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8572565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6384667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003145433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016321233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3376925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604877886","doi":"","title":"“Windows to our Inner Private Lives”: Cell Phones, Informational Privacy and the Power to Search Incident to Arrest in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.022178387114042637,"score_gpt":0.29204043825878634,"score_spread":0.2698620511447437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604877886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346748,0.0001306502,0.00005235934,0.05708074,0.00023487651,0.0006780696,0.0000029886635,0.000012118878,0.0071334215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945521,0.000016083479,0.00017759942,0.0041971123,0.00015359464,0.000054161665,0.000001605292,0.0000067510637,0.0008410016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998158,0.000149781,0.00022370958,0.00019024087,0.0006756353,0.0006026352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991411,0.00009510352,0.000034848836,0.00020079174,0.00010611598,0.00042202356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011161335,0.000104133316,0.0001472708,0.00007092491,0.00020312228,0.00011739034,0.00050288026,0.00003034985,0.000027538072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043667364,0.00008064651,0.000018913457,0.0004723829,0.000036327787,0.00021130334,0.00024996925,0.00021750332,0.00013102578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023120618,0.00020261097,0.03569968,0.000062333056,0.00004975168,0.000054285676,0.42773134,0.0071356096,0.001777939,0.15056756,0.36574206,0.008664782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092492404,0.00023512809,0.030904766,0.000046879093,0.000008223645,0.0000035177575,0.015436003,0.00007260741,0.00070784695,0.0011135082,0.9501709,0.00037570213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8132942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95484155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58442885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011143843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037041414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65709877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605447899","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Safer Communities and Neighbourhoods Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Environmental planning; Legislation; Business; Environmental protection; Geography; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law; Computer security; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09727103351673626,"score_gpt":0.31979761048108357,"score_spread":0.2225265769643473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605447899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42922917,0.00029594108,0.00037263962,0.004406598,0.00007926115,0.00009491263,4.6543838e-7,0.000061679166,0.5654593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858677,0.00028562095,0.0019943768,0.00021381103,0.000058807425,4.9935613e-7,5.488462e-7,0.00000334521,0.011575334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956644,0.000064757885,0.000070793256,0.00006420307,0.000095246134,0.00013858067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995916,0.0001234037,0.000020310177,0.00010110986,0.000025071377,0.00013851143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019809451,0.000051398074,0.0000684574,0.000023515995,0.00049338193,0.00007424374,0.000090758556,0.00004308808,0.0014246043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035438974,0.000044578985,0.000012541623,0.000056925852,0.0002230889,0.00035519875,0.000050228078,0.000054823813,0.000012033592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111822665,0.000010634854,0.048403952,0.000005608315,0.000006045938,7.631424e-7,0.06864371,6.2385226e-8,0.000014200845,0.86966866,0.0021293797,0.011105786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016357588,0.00006259198,0.8188235,0.000036609727,0.000031340052,0.0000044172,0.039800137,0.000012469076,0.000107835345,0.026249012,0.1145245,0.00018399907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19569191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19496793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8434197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009503135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015679852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605940818","doi":"","title":"Proportionality As a Moral Process: Reconceiving Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimum Penalties","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Discretion; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Judicial discretion; Political science; Constitutional law; Due Process Clause; Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.03258079987474709,"score_gpt":0.36176128704216204,"score_spread":0.32918048716741494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605940818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811108,0.0011381999,0.0002795755,0.008960538,0.00025665734,0.00013742714,0.0000014102117,0.000022541557,0.008092839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943423,0.0023590513,0.000019731116,0.000056201825,0.00075843796,0.0000064848036,8.707736e-7,0.000007413699,0.0024494748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979122,0.00011235164,0.00021190582,0.00019226443,0.00045173385,0.0011194868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992519,0.00003386526,0.00032804438,0.00012290587,0.00014085184,0.00012241455],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032163437,0.00009933652,0.00014137254,0.000035237426,0.0032095339,0.00040983138,0.0003346769,0.00007029139,0.00010510258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056561804,0.00008821757,0.00005951569,0.00003270476,0.00058513705,0.0010723359,0.000031200325,0.0007155141,0.000013944844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039398536,0.00010286232,0.08683724,0.000055624347,0.00010907615,0.000025635496,0.01306758,0.0000031884128,0.00015192489,0.8243709,0.00025332766,0.07462866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035504298,0.00025802158,0.022922378,0.00012365426,0.000059568196,0.00017793184,0.02639385,0.000020502692,0.00004915404,0.94564337,0.0037533871,0.00024315774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026695721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021386566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12127246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038724908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003157022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606606565","doi":"","title":"Recent Development in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05329449941115426,"score_gpt":0.3195878401051497,"score_spread":0.2662933406939954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606606565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34297717,0.0017788289,0.000044254113,0.007985312,0.0011840749,0.00021542438,0.0000044610206,0.000043524127,0.645767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953097,0.0002397529,0.0014622281,0.0012341233,0.0009335529,0.000008963221,0.000005887211,0.000019094477,0.00078669563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968088,0.00023769651,0.0005930026,0.000290966,0.0007675988,0.0013019056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984954,0.00008919932,0.00013535719,0.00015251158,0.00028691874,0.0008406174],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019165229,0.00021637972,0.0002529967,0.0001845705,0.0026171708,0.00044277948,0.00052534224,0.00015279838,0.0010643866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010086137,0.00021635438,0.000091239905,0.0002567685,0.0005017522,0.0005521803,0.000038862774,0.0005570279,0.0001905215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055678884,0.000103762235,0.0013940916,0.00002595605,0.0000076768965,0.00083437574,0.006894117,0.000031670945,0.000048846214,0.9655784,0.0038679931,0.02115743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023724488,0.0000467605,0.0050405175,0.00012364467,0.00004821668,0.00019449274,0.005962632,0.0000040862415,0.00033646714,0.0050989054,0.9825983,0.00030874455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8833674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99545425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016136982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017487169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606776311","doi":"10.11575/prism/28760","title":"Absolute and Conditional Discharges in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Absolute (philosophy); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016276678938622613,"score_gpt":0.23730037246577232,"score_spread":0.2210236935271497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606776311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7738294,0.00010594603,0.0034007863,0.011300492,0.00007925859,0.00014099834,0.0000016669673,0.000017899074,0.21112356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972663,0.00004257591,0.0014243965,0.00013407113,0.000013045988,1.3014913e-7,0.000004095486,0.0000017352138,0.0011136275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994701,0.000057609584,0.000042530715,0.000106391846,0.00013186723,0.00019149008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996415,0.00006005743,0.00002529806,0.00005152939,0.000024509927,0.00019715678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002752209,0.000039478757,0.00008250067,0.00006353429,0.00032234314,0.000011279259,0.00012465398,0.000050165592,0.0002322888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031347798,0.000050822287,0.00002223117,0.00005112448,0.0004400771,0.00021860782,0.000024853443,0.000065818065,0.000015645413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011975956,0.00001208692,0.006438813,0.000016049727,0.000003703579,0.000016893855,0.007556849,1.4982244e-7,0.000023837352,0.9745916,0.0010088055,0.010319237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031446174,0.000044204877,0.28958136,0.000041456464,0.000032016214,0.0000018870091,0.0019794006,0.0013900171,0.000008530253,0.018827075,0.6876087,0.00017089931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8821469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83078235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95576453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057702837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121243145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25433993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606922302","doi":"10.1177/016934410402200104","title":"Codes of Conduct for the Judiciary in Civil Law Countries: The Dutch Example","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Law; Political science; Safeguarding; Code of conduct; Civil code; Code (set theory); Independence (probability theory); Ethical code; Individualism; Computer science","score_opus":0.06134808012574244,"score_gpt":0.34776196725601105,"score_spread":0.2864138871302686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606922302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869445,0.0005253729,0.00010397749,0.00249952,0.00017356953,0.0005683788,0.000019179604,0.000020086762,0.009145432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994915,0.00001309453,0.000030812225,0.0001012978,0.00017338282,0.000031119853,0.0000033251074,0.000007174996,0.0001482759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874836,0.0001326698,0.0003394656,0.00016499676,0.00035207887,0.00026243678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984477,0.0009551789,0.00016817388,0.0002771078,0.000116320494,0.00003552569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012219478,0.00010737527,0.00024513688,0.00003233175,0.0008468379,0.00004004245,0.0005169467,0.00007860909,0.00013730643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010647838,0.000057249174,0.00009342772,0.00011209445,0.0012186304,0.0001534408,0.000008077239,0.00010902731,0.000004617701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055213975,0.00006781412,0.00020757604,0.000028210521,0.000024656909,0.0000018232802,0.09018823,0.000016232145,0.00031923692,0.90804344,0.00084092515,0.00020664984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012367408,0.0013718097,0.002115787,0.00020652844,0.00007494925,0.000001647937,0.016655453,0.000008710043,0.0012151613,0.8768429,0.10007089,0.00019938956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19075288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6194452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42869234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003643193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000848344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.814636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607234028","doi":"","title":"Judging Sexual Assault Trials: Systemic Failure in the Case of Regina v Bassam Al-Rawi","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Sexual assault; Psychology; Cross-examination; Criminology; Political science; Witness; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.07683977261115024,"score_gpt":0.36694719748358634,"score_spread":0.2901074248724361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607234028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363222,0.00065978523,0.00006541193,0.042668622,0.0006970983,0.000722171,0.000026303796,0.00005870489,0.018779673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974378,0.00005970412,0.00017408677,0.00043844248,0.000533674,0.0000395135,0.0000020530754,0.0000126418,0.0013021082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673104,0.0014437279,0.0004298818,0.00035407083,0.000585223,0.0004560339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718225,0.0010755083,0.0005312126,0.0009056418,0.00015326055,0.00015215408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011388018,0.00016959691,0.00048910594,0.000051797724,0.0015383778,0.0005197828,0.0011278916,0.00018562799,0.00010388617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050925915,0.00012605681,0.00013208209,0.00014956479,0.0005266655,0.00079207873,0.00010353462,0.00045369493,0.000084695166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002374863,0.00024374288,0.02581006,0.00061389274,0.00010706143,0.004954807,0.026837902,0.00009355429,0.0029931008,0.7713505,0.15536511,0.011392785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019382748,0.00023868289,0.002299855,0.00142063,0.00024349222,0.00077228213,0.13509387,0.00015709159,0.00036403004,0.0043188008,0.8523106,0.00084239646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09299372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19955845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76703167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011319843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023641779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607265275","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4558","title":"Laverne A. Jacobs &amp; Justice Anne L. Mactavish, eds., Dialogue Between Court And Tribunals – Essays In Administrative Law And Justice (2001- 2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Administration of justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Administration (probate law); Administrative law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10415412601389791,"score_gpt":0.40192674316524135,"score_spread":0.29777261715134345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607265275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7334242,0.0040961606,0.0008972604,0.022483813,0.001244314,0.0023121308,0.00051340525,0.00019686125,0.23483188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332404,0.0009152888,0.00112044,0.002151572,0.0011007115,0.00001581709,0.000017998087,0.00002220328,0.0013319133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706954,0.00024349794,0.0005978926,0.0006214558,0.0006878489,0.000779787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971386,0.001393113,0.000263707,0.00031138823,0.00030753785,0.000585612],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015958309,0.0003134966,0.0006168683,0.000177678,0.00046548084,0.00032311978,0.0006574284,0.00025626668,0.00020490456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017483146,0.00033063116,0.0000555227,0.00052986987,0.00057962036,0.0010770682,0.0001727088,0.00037132186,0.00004651871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006371026,0.0033674329,0.04670659,0.009597101,0.0005599277,0.0010156534,0.1078834,0.00083715166,0.006466809,0.49310067,0.27403817,0.05005605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050674416,0.0024754251,0.32934427,0.0027757217,0.009740591,0.000045286775,0.024347788,0.00016603147,0.0020432116,0.018849472,0.60157275,0.0035719902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048773848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005521072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4742512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009429806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002668218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608718183","doi":"","title":"Une revue de certaines décisions d’intérêt rendues en 2016 par la Commission des oppositions du Canada : leçons à tirer en quatre thèmes","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023647038687881598,"score_gpt":0.29123824802620774,"score_spread":0.26759120933832614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608718183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39288163,0.012475914,0.0054516434,0.29701424,0.0022996718,0.00093507336,0.00018488415,0.00019233061,0.2885646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574343,0.008172201,0.0027754388,0.00026702756,0.0008531279,0.000055595276,0.000016812193,0.000053132484,0.13037239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568355,0.0016083333,0.0005292664,0.00059624267,0.0004767396,0.0011058876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945147,0.003387028,0.00031346155,0.0008133004,0.00028243213,0.0006890755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016547694,0.00045495832,0.0005147626,0.000108344,0.0074281706,0.00048272853,0.0015257298,0.0007259583,0.0015867393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062148124,0.00042844092,0.00028493244,0.00034988247,0.0038227572,0.00052038784,0.00033260588,0.0011267882,0.00008094879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003220216,0.0005266596,0.010742677,0.00060287194,0.00030502066,0.00064962043,0.1528509,0.0002919201,0.0019916352,0.10790124,0.56425655,0.15955888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032398335,0.00022012729,0.0050246855,0.0016905003,0.0003295782,0.00018889482,0.020037293,0.0013762912,0.0024059142,0.02793161,0.939721,0.00075011235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8194538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.788887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46455264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001983502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029832083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609370083","doi":"","title":"Regulating Inductive Reasoning In Sexual Assault Cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Credibility; Witness; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04829442865174226,"score_gpt":0.36874147960823345,"score_spread":0.3204470509564912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609370083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864506,0.00051523716,0.00010755603,0.0033159696,0.0002146019,0.0000674761,3.9130526e-7,0.000016222139,0.009311934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640507,0.00041817108,0.000109249115,0.000023720453,0.00071631937,0.0000022749718,2.5950052e-7,0.000008859256,0.0023160658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973095,0.0001848069,0.00018755982,0.00017373577,0.00040676442,0.0017376246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992605,0.00011666277,0.00025854463,0.00017332708,0.000103403756,0.00008756216],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043704296,0.00009092418,0.00013832522,0.0000608311,0.0022640382,0.0003129897,0.00046614098,0.00009806564,0.000020356001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024296842,0.000087098764,0.00004241562,0.00007426948,0.00020875726,0.0008601423,0.000052572064,0.0015648581,0.000012235479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008970061,0.000055531636,0.12807825,0.000005095327,0.00004824452,0.00010789356,0.011604229,0.000025401376,0.000389086,0.68407965,0.00014739466,0.17536952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013250203,0.0007162513,0.09554634,0.0004246047,0.00008206666,0.0011673707,0.41029137,0.00013278506,0.00019759029,0.47555628,0.013704054,0.0008562566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037177183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28538913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39868712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011064655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024066889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610341274","doi":"10.17118/11143/10458","title":"L’éventualité de mécanismes réflexifs dans le cadre du procès pénal français","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.009153411711967608,"score_gpt":0.22190961534700634,"score_spread":0.21275620363503875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610341274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290597,0.0016141693,0.0018753083,0.013849354,0.00084377243,0.00028862106,0.000045301982,0.00013945575,0.15228432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365322,0.00075644965,0.0013540011,0.0004306705,0.0011296411,0.0000059979147,0.000008274952,0.00004468356,0.15973811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731624,0.00024372633,0.00029795017,0.000559992,0.00038850898,0.0011935633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831486,0.00022736266,0.00016420837,0.00042209937,0.00014090951,0.0007305374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009508163,0.00031629673,0.00037796094,0.00010127918,0.0012484009,0.000127668,0.0010013159,0.00061280944,0.0018449136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017039257,0.0004406896,0.00034841962,0.0004660184,0.00095605874,0.00055697357,0.00022636155,0.00079956074,0.00034567164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116805946,0.0002526408,0.038005665,0.00047299158,0.00009429594,0.0011227842,0.08375343,0.00017250891,0.02153676,0.8431522,0.0049540587,0.0063658115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006783326,0.00015977272,0.029657753,0.00047161203,0.00035965224,0.0006732042,0.013038999,0.00084272266,0.0071737296,0.015098398,0.9310943,0.0007515595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05247431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08350877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026256964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009946703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611576022","doi":"10.17118/11143/10459","title":"Perspectives pour un principe de sécurité juridique en droit canadien : les pistes du droit européen","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008372292835846104,"score_gpt":0.21802871036258814,"score_spread":0.20965641752674202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611576022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79664904,0.0024948611,0.00045562274,0.014073333,0.0004504221,0.00032623133,0.0000534888,0.00015067811,0.18534632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8323373,0.0029815636,0.0021013163,0.0001774207,0.0014091905,0.0000068079266,0.0000064574124,0.000073244264,0.1609067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965296,0.00041192846,0.00035194267,0.00083123974,0.00038241447,0.0014928894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973133,0.00059536647,0.00023724568,0.000569107,0.00027840355,0.0010065362],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012104707,0.0004323162,0.00050011795,0.000190949,0.0013235998,0.00014742013,0.0013296274,0.00066058256,0.0020231009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056620373,0.0006257008,0.0003848565,0.00052772457,0.0008793962,0.0005087639,0.00032697353,0.001116904,0.0002440903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000934474,0.00020360023,0.021891087,0.0002989501,0.00012702087,0.0018967516,0.039224647,0.00010789097,0.004933649,0.9222575,0.00090569,0.008059798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008750532,0.00029051016,0.054770857,0.0007280084,0.0006383438,0.0013914317,0.02174715,0.0010180096,0.003090515,0.054722812,0.8593655,0.0013617722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07689425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24552883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86753464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006857623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018038558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612230206","doi":"10.33137/cal.v4i1.28143","title":"Making Modern Criminal Law Theory: Reflections on Farmer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Public law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Political science; Order (exchange); Theory of criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal justice; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.25974253422175475,"score_gpt":0.5072798401635514,"score_spread":0.24753730594179668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612230206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029442562,0.0001015098,0.003866455,0.011164396,0.00022143677,0.00006186034,0.000017797563,0.000047610174,0.9550764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978602,0.000008459941,0.00039469393,0.0008588399,0.00014531963,0.00000558551,0.000002012533,0.0000063485436,0.000718532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985204,0.00018825011,0.00021473637,0.00028824486,0.00046803,0.0003203404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984109,0.000611235,0.00007156802,0.0005431999,0.00023405593,0.00012903482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085170346,0.000098828044,0.00029920475,0.00008581128,0.0031644956,0.00039866372,0.0005152729,0.00008689982,0.0007116013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011145772,0.000089158915,0.00032351847,0.00015844994,0.0031018178,0.0003538004,0.00007186061,0.00014385337,0.00003804312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034036562,0.00008419669,0.00008985728,0.000011567031,0.00014836776,0.000008033673,0.0019657048,0.000024758612,0.00017880928,0.99627763,0.000037007405,0.0011400328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016537234,0.000177014,0.0022749354,0.00017359483,0.009760121,0.0000014116035,0.0055835843,0.0010733202,0.0007543138,0.8432363,0.13628091,0.0005191036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00551756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025729664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96841764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004322933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003561406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612415927","doi":"","title":"Electronic Evidence in Canada - Chapter 9, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Digital evidence; The Internet; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Digital forensics; History","score_opus":0.053739326934055406,"score_gpt":0.31132971184675484,"score_spread":0.2575903849126994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612415927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68470055,0.025439898,0.000014696411,0.010374454,0.0025932135,0.00048526935,0.0000072714715,0.00006344282,0.2763212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473035,0.0003592039,0.000014547958,0.0004939403,0.00053823733,0.000023690958,0.0000011720697,0.000015075458,0.0038237576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743444,0.00016967578,0.00028240008,0.0002702627,0.00051874475,0.0013244598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987049,0.00042379808,0.0000699768,0.00026516058,0.000110643356,0.0004255284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086905394,0.0001791745,0.00022804942,0.000044372475,0.00035934226,0.000036452835,0.00049336045,0.000065046945,0.0010163178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044270934,0.00018340503,0.000040209114,0.00036502056,0.000111790396,0.0005771579,0.000076476375,0.00029935793,0.00015038143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007580916,0.00014787361,0.31616974,0.00012671402,0.00004309984,0.000060581737,0.01669844,0.00002179215,0.00023850588,0.54034054,0.093434155,0.032642715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089814566,0.000013949289,0.026012013,0.00011436625,0.000014641695,0.000003341818,0.0018385692,0.000020563748,0.00017949061,0.00020852267,0.97120804,0.00029670174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8777739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003760483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124417925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613250512","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2017.470","title":"Cell Site Simulators: A Call for More Protective Federal Legislation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Legislation; Internet privacy; Government (linguistics); Conversation; Computer security; Personally identifiable information; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04312109194144873,"score_gpt":0.3245830469146637,"score_spread":0.28146195497321497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613250512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16107588,0.09274118,0.08624873,0.18105963,0.0020368977,0.031142266,0.00024621538,0.00074627926,0.44470292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331397,0.0045144493,0.00037438684,0.00023142064,0.00008626941,0.0000015299854,0.0000031106365,0.0000058383525,0.0014690127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999251,0.00006979473,0.00010370157,0.00018956611,0.00020812811,0.00017781576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990715,0.00008138615,0.0002628437,0.00027341125,0.00022692124,0.00008398859],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004978868,0.00008189606,0.00024162214,0.000014391867,0.0016515043,0.000043056265,0.00037271835,0.00006379268,0.00006453775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014812562,0.00008896745,0.0001698312,0.000039426333,0.0004777834,0.00050876,0.00006787476,0.00006904557,0.000009971905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057556614,0.0006454158,0.008821667,0.01506077,0.00019681908,0.00010188639,0.0534414,0.00010555765,0.00070125324,0.7656956,0.11213255,0.042521548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002643585,0.00005694091,0.00075967243,0.0013452516,0.0000997995,2.4519082e-7,0.00041546658,0.00002472936,0.000021695974,0.0023108907,0.9945599,0.00014106171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023966325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037146695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88242733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007538379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009663499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613999954","doi":"","title":"Anti-Gang Legislation: Is the Disease Worst than the Cure?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Criminal code; Constitutionality; Civil liberties; Political science; Humanities; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Constitution; Criminal law; Art","score_opus":0.023341826691470054,"score_gpt":0.30760349360517064,"score_spread":0.2842616669137006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613999954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38227642,0.016964424,0.0016139693,0.5751863,0.0007578598,0.00031992546,0.0000020800376,0.000058868023,0.02282017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96970755,0.019102257,0.0000032606388,0.0007858167,0.0015224088,0.0000037138436,4.4762822e-7,0.000008357576,0.008866199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746877,0.00024019282,0.00015880012,0.0001331515,0.0005349624,0.0014641453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993432,0.00014982384,0.000109101784,0.00019929829,0.00007972747,0.00011883532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002709664,0.00009639893,0.000085871594,0.000025649844,0.0024634432,0.00026386383,0.0006319953,0.000036392008,0.00020005867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011525124,0.00005258301,0.00013855108,0.0003085134,0.00026937257,0.0003572311,0.000031308566,0.0009868611,0.00008827519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065954264,0.00004978697,0.037052512,0.0000019619783,0.00006985373,0.000020714298,0.010745205,0.00003615469,0.000016896001,0.9226433,0.009235639,0.020062046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013654327,0.000041343163,0.012006946,0.000028678967,0.00008239072,0.000100543126,0.018298632,0.000044265496,0.000004007603,0.2687812,0.70032775,0.00014772713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012365178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016112052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69109213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032136496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018277832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615912535","doi":"10.71781/2166","title":"Les implications de la Commission de vérité et réconciliation du Canada pour l'État de droit et la justice transitionnelle : étude comparée avec l'Afrique du Sud","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034979884024936424,"score_gpt":0.35919343871647186,"score_spread":0.32421355469153545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615912535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84802884,0.00017750163,0.008474125,0.044090033,0.00021899788,0.0006018307,0.00030208385,0.0000085233105,0.098098084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880343,0.000611157,0.0030154632,0.00036530953,0.0002235276,0.000091256654,0.00037261282,0.00003192269,0.0072544636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965743,0.0016708202,0.0004510903,0.00046046532,0.00035698566,0.00048634986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996304,0.0024387415,0.0003261109,0.0002447468,0.00031538412,0.00037101685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025514183,0.000297069,0.0003552032,0.000054803553,0.0013110817,0.00040761151,0.0008482169,0.0004366548,0.0015675218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005730554,0.0003141331,0.000098729884,0.0002196276,0.00020219503,0.00048628828,0.000055932374,0.00041741447,0.000058321362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052883837,0.0010101381,0.030055605,0.0006200348,0.00020744279,0.00023568142,0.32163963,0.0020292364,0.027978508,0.51427174,0.017882021,0.08354112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015698503,0.00014094598,0.44094005,0.0024758712,0.0013333808,0.00024461697,0.07578941,0.0026778495,0.005699878,0.014540485,0.45303696,0.0015506872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7052509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94856685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49973127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012593553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007025204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616016891","doi":"","title":"Breslaw v Montréal (Ville)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.03152090902814618,"score_gpt":0.3136406745343929,"score_spread":0.28211976550624673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616016891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011588266,0.018942282,0.0001901024,0.29238063,0.0011272655,0.00008134722,0.0000017068555,0.00006468329,0.6756237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6970595,0.0018433802,0.0005568338,0.0036085388,0.0007168576,7.076678e-7,4.2445603e-7,0.0000033949436,0.29621038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878657,0.00008769788,0.0001655959,0.00020550318,0.00032691957,0.00042774118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948096,0.00008128932,0.000036415226,0.00015074272,0.00005384461,0.00019674611],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003061373,0.0001083963,0.00013502387,0.00001772024,0.00035489086,0.00008373796,0.0002186643,0.00012301246,0.004278291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059684462,0.0001025567,0.00010286928,0.00023953248,0.00029102244,0.00037907247,0.000019918501,0.00011593588,0.0026175894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007641661,0.0000632616,0.000049620878,0.0000042202287,0.0000032568266,0.000023807843,0.0018649175,0.000006166508,0.000030568597,0.68269897,0.1648814,0.15036614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007587441,0.00012822535,0.0017473926,0.000039720802,0.000024259882,0.000006061113,0.0018540197,0.00007479415,0.000054846034,0.021406934,0.97443384,0.00015401952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047812317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014235868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80955243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007686059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006869018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622509506","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Privacy Law In Canada by Colin H.H. McNairn and Alexander K. Scott","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020821476155695275,"score_gpt":0.2703251312553222,"score_spread":0.24950365509962694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622509506","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022596644,0.7715514,0.000005298186,0.05403352,0.0004402365,0.0009709894,0.00003575299,0.000082942075,0.15028326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7026324,0.10957098,0.00011197726,0.13868345,0.00032404374,0.00007646738,0.000009204765,0.000034871344,0.048556544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808896,0.00019669936,0.00032992818,0.00035558103,0.000511975,0.0005168553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906296,0.0001515978,0.00008325926,0.00027327193,0.000057510366,0.0003713816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047494218,0.00016313263,0.00029758975,0.000016877935,0.00041930875,0.00009860976,0.00034771557,0.000077090466,0.006044661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002001785,0.00016323407,0.000041211893,0.00021083838,0.00027709454,0.0005351495,0.00007653221,0.0002681154,0.00014550512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046357613,0.00002350776,0.0017729173,0.00011521812,0.0000049453424,0.00002880926,0.00031047533,8.1505726e-7,0.000017506949,0.013155666,0.9841268,0.00043867147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020759928,0.000017562135,0.00032728133,0.0005401879,0.000015780133,0.0000032344042,0.00017187596,0.000010285943,0.0000492397,0.00015575535,0.998283,0.0002181915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99026054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6800358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043863236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003010488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626888679","doi":"10.1017/9781108333436.012","title":"Canadian Constitutional Law of Freedom of Expression","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Content (measure theory); Law; Freedom of information; Political science; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Mathematics; Human rights; Programming language","score_opus":0.044083150834223796,"score_gpt":0.2511995627698897,"score_spread":0.2071164119356659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626888679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006711582,0.000107523774,0.000038064234,0.0000544573,0.00027117817,0.00018679287,0.00059273955,0.000014832735,0.9986673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.122579895,0.00007058381,0.00007344369,0.000011614345,0.00009944518,1.4753735e-7,0.000015353722,0.0000062560644,0.87714326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904835,0.000036162404,0.00014599468,0.00022063313,0.0003465682,0.00020227546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867696,0.0000762922,0.00031406383,0.00037006472,0.0003040888,0.0002585354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017243496,0.00014212805,0.00029532574,0.00009956646,0.00065739464,0.000021115917,0.0006769736,0.00031109518,0.000029141578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003450902,0.0001704154,0.00015487013,0.000002496489,0.004112951,0.00012690412,0.00013252697,0.00018433617,0.0000045436195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029030118,0.000003287057,0.0000071033,0.00005080698,0.00002364947,0.0000618146,0.00020046304,0.0000020591885,0.000069897695,0.9844977,0.014958476,0.000095680094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014067379,0.000016768587,0.000008782765,0.00050124637,0.000088641966,0.000001390931,0.000120782555,0.0000013439893,0.0003405208,0.000080213154,0.99853575,0.00016386564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5410624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09150098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024331006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001290224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635332471","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5496478","title":"Le droit moral au Canada : facteur d'idées","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009984059097620275,"score_gpt":0.25981680309734917,"score_spread":0.2498327439997289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635332471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48946583,0.0675473,0.002301659,0.23591588,0.009391127,0.00026679324,0.000020007366,0.00004637941,0.19504504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87321854,0.007355361,0.000013793698,0.00058818667,0.00095776416,0.0000022861059,0.0000014991645,0.000011382181,0.11785117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994688,0.00027534887,0.00037170752,0.00026349834,0.0005358387,0.0038656062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991627,0.00015583662,0.00016031049,0.00016153866,0.00014564217,0.00021396877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017887075,0.00020293465,0.0002759658,0.00007091926,0.0014863462,0.00013289442,0.000656793,0.00013839411,0.00014463841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018885509,0.00022436962,0.0001642033,0.0005075292,0.00034440085,0.000452647,0.00006469143,0.002108019,0.000033888373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031160667,0.000045516565,0.0032887512,0.000020441283,0.00011425269,0.000020140185,0.00051825534,0.000039161758,0.000012483008,0.95033085,0.004345861,0.041233115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028524935,0.00014125406,0.0021050167,0.0001567973,0.00011170082,0.00010576669,0.016482204,0.000027844046,0.00005015422,0.4974751,0.48280472,0.00025420648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47845885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007623215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13482367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W265319787","doi":"","title":"Crimes of Colour: Racialization and the Criminal Justice System in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Criminalization; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal justice; Gender studies; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Race (biology); History","score_opus":0.11623980732258908,"score_gpt":0.38895627827256823,"score_spread":0.27271647094997914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W265319787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89868164,0.0026531955,0.000022624348,0.0041274596,0.00014952659,0.00094391184,0.000021186532,0.0000143440775,0.0933861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981934,0.00018625418,0.00003131173,0.000035399553,0.00012593337,0.000050388524,6.221682e-7,0.0000060537063,0.001370625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979325,0.0005293731,0.00023455406,0.0001667945,0.00076281774,0.00037395617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968198,0.002686343,0.00006550007,0.00013200764,0.00020959288,0.00008675445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033918454,0.00005964634,0.00016735788,0.00007521778,0.00083247514,0.00008115209,0.00031919536,0.000047306752,0.00003589316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015358222,0.000045039407,0.000027729802,0.00034189905,0.0008837138,0.000050299743,0.000059768,0.00013886635,0.000002119273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012255714,0.000083250394,0.007978602,0.003559705,0.000026059624,0.00003460402,0.26257616,0.000056826713,0.00006865885,0.68852186,0.02455552,0.011313164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001010737,0.00012345827,0.0018416243,0.00030740816,0.00012138321,0.0000070985398,0.5975698,0.004481534,0.00012336137,0.0003824488,0.39387912,0.00015201853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8853891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87583447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68813944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003367989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038512377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64028096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656835543","doi":"10.21991/c96966","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, II : l’article 33 de la Charte canadienne ne permet pas de suspendre la répartition fédérative des compétences","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05619664453501023,"score_gpt":0.33656291197268334,"score_spread":0.2803662674376731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656835543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.641491,0.0041781263,0.044031177,0.092504315,0.002161943,0.0006964732,0.0011159932,0.00018519412,0.2136358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909821,0.0009424807,0.0031649193,0.00085016765,0.00053682696,0.00011177961,0.0000456476,0.000017807148,0.003348262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949791,0.0008850606,0.00063895166,0.0007090852,0.00052604167,0.0022617625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966032,0.0008951267,0.00044439003,0.00052299036,0.0004938678,0.0010404374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654248,0.00051651214,0.00052363303,0.00015397737,0.017380428,0.0008436788,0.0009813036,0.0005545027,0.0009244887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002497461,0.00056596636,0.00036074646,0.00030694387,0.051265873,0.0022453635,0.0003643209,0.00071705383,0.00014329096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008691426,0.00031907958,0.06796832,0.00006763849,0.00012534551,0.0002758746,0.0039952463,0.0009106454,0.0007415872,0.9146174,0.004807979,0.006083944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014785271,0.00023318226,0.02888786,0.001328899,0.0004118117,0.0017208388,0.021047305,0.0025822672,0.0010846875,0.39709458,0.54310596,0.0010240682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08378612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20582765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.538298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019027123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065500196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2692194743","doi":"","title":"A Question of ‘Desirability’: Balancing and Improperly Obtained Evidence in Comparative Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Common law; Jurisprudence; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Political science; Perspective (graphical); High Court","score_opus":0.3217763733101101,"score_gpt":0.45304869729556135,"score_spread":0.13127232398545124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2692194743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6333166,0.002581535,0.00009429751,0.013248257,0.00019236973,0.0027885218,0.0005159868,0.00011333338,0.34714913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753052,0.0035007212,0.00033352943,0.000011050383,0.00015740952,8.989508e-7,0.000017700817,0.000012552858,0.12066097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963257,0.00084634987,0.0002883846,0.00079633004,0.0011949537,0.0005483161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950379,0.0014461613,0.00028292494,0.0005550834,0.0023686772,0.0003092152],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044496334,0.00026308658,0.00070769887,0.0005029791,0.0011873227,0.00011579724,0.000990861,0.00042589914,0.000101733756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032163877,0.0002934105,0.00014491867,0.0001599094,0.0041839615,0.0010344702,0.00058580644,0.0015286232,0.000008699897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024427627,0.00043149656,0.021649938,0.0006158245,0.00013403065,0.0003848443,0.04334899,0.000008089988,0.0004093573,0.9248174,0.00070681557,0.005050438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005342877,0.0050590886,0.24479628,0.025750227,0.00064474734,0.000031378357,0.14038813,0.0012971763,0.00034227993,0.23390824,0.3381577,0.0042818733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10165689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24793078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6909092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019527277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016548549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2695559067","doi":"10.21991/c9ft21","title":"Was the Supreme Court right to change the law on the right to a speedy trial?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science","score_opus":0.09176488806049153,"score_gpt":0.34214430239926347,"score_spread":0.2503794143387719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2695559067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043178634,0.00023276766,0.0029397826,0.6671952,0.0048298845,0.00351734,0.00020668324,0.00010789133,0.3166526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674226,0.00005179982,0.00010828608,0.028003337,0.0015755033,0.0006755804,0.00001139621,0.000011129935,0.002140392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607694,0.00031103494,0.0005108603,0.0006301685,0.0013252404,0.0011457453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963036,0.0011062677,0.00026004057,0.0014758339,0.0004283692,0.0004258559],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025197195,0.00038910302,0.00035046888,0.000088766305,0.024178892,0.00116707,0.0027752272,0.00018589986,0.00093250984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002432404,0.00020043187,0.00033837,0.00031042396,0.014346133,0.00085434923,0.00053434545,0.00048355758,0.002253608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006683568,0.000081237915,0.00020923959,0.000003432351,0.000038356266,0.000021427817,0.0009534582,0.000030242272,0.000020106654,0.9211196,0.076461695,0.0003928915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015730237,0.00013956582,0.00020740241,0.00018887958,0.00007427752,0.000032917866,0.0028342253,0.000026492999,0.00022038646,0.039881032,0.9544682,0.00035361483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047207107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027781252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003446137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001149433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701570167","doi":"10.4324/9781315197166-7","title":"The Domestic Implementation of International Law: A Canadian Case Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05394344754980281,"score_gpt":0.4069404085289421,"score_spread":0.3529969609791393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701570167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024403785,0.000054003216,0.0000017969382,0.0017709716,0.00057877065,0.00046240306,0.000024945608,0.000007393942,0.99465936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6515649,0.000042207696,0.000005769617,0.000073859665,0.00008528499,0.0000031837144,0.0000032822604,0.000004662163,0.34821683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992222,0.00002401218,0.00017918636,0.00011976918,0.0003258975,0.00012892754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993647,0.0001885875,0.00009428673,0.00012931808,0.00014291161,0.00008022524],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045005087,0.00007270331,0.00008996611,0.00004485679,0.000355988,0.00007260448,0.00023145376,0.000050893414,0.0020714363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018520237,0.000053708958,0.000045359735,0.000012084172,0.00013593092,0.00007312686,0.00002812453,0.00007729231,0.00008050258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019003066,0.0000032773057,0.00033217997,0.000002465045,0.000032408534,0.00021753558,0.0043160673,2.664547e-7,1.114752e-7,0.98978,0.0013855415,0.003928209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010630488,0.00007003342,0.000111609115,0.00001683483,0.000060154933,0.000044152835,0.059667557,0.0000010915178,3.8553236e-7,0.006307655,0.93350893,0.00010528208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95967215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018916896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000848773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2705872271","doi":"","title":"Canada. La Supreme Court conferma la legittimità costituzionale di alcune disposizioni dell’Anti-Terrorism Act del 2001","year":2017,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057443398910410504,"score_gpt":0.34071983036960607,"score_spread":0.28327643145919557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2705872271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7752118,0.001505801,0.00018815798,0.14724536,0.004249127,0.000887574,0.0025659357,0.00012395732,0.06802228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96518034,0.003110324,0.00019551435,0.0009268106,0.0014365562,0.000012753127,0.00022645952,0.000049222497,0.028862018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957674,0.00040810916,0.00062814547,0.00076590304,0.0012765992,0.0011538415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650526,0.0007804708,0.00054583355,0.0010138645,0.00041607695,0.0007384665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011978723,0.0005089465,0.0006860759,0.00006053007,0.002454411,0.0007564004,0.0018071881,0.00040483897,0.00074242946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000938272,0.0005012758,0.00022476021,0.00014951767,0.0013346951,0.0008696808,0.0004074294,0.00069411175,0.00014602186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047483385,0.0027061435,0.10561672,0.0003743713,0.0005374824,0.003155329,0.0048249373,0.00045498792,0.002111069,0.05162205,0.8138276,0.014294491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005925538,0.000060559578,0.10011264,0.00041432364,0.00023044679,0.000042607455,0.0011573025,0.0017878953,0.00011500245,0.00012422031,0.89472467,0.0006377896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81819934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18996854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037164494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004385965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2713442250","doi":"10.7202/1040052ar","title":"Le rôle des normes comptables dans la responsabilité civile des auditeurs de sociétés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999221718854669,"score_gpt":0.3817974042466343,"score_spread":0.29180518705808756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2713442250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3493311,0.0036315792,0.00022701408,0.013680942,0.0017072279,0.00012439823,0.00008961979,0.000048393154,0.6311597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856689,0.0036391912,0.002655512,0.00009431681,0.00076749397,0.0000065342897,8.66776e-7,0.00003534077,0.007131828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963597,0.0011720336,0.00047665366,0.0003303138,0.00056330505,0.0010979977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973514,0.00084079243,0.00045304067,0.0004515392,0.00029547155,0.0006077352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038304068,0.0002802165,0.00040785735,0.000044277956,0.036652517,0.00098536,0.0012973264,0.00026110426,0.0010244063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012353327,0.0002804167,0.0003642292,0.000119704026,0.009091099,0.002141686,0.00023586213,0.0006403631,0.000121619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012695658,0.00030770153,0.013690809,0.00012509547,0.00008351494,0.0003034522,0.0048924237,0.0000883218,0.000685354,0.93293005,0.0026076003,0.044158693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041010673,0.00016197737,0.012401154,0.00062447326,0.00012584413,0.0006636632,0.017121967,0.000042565724,0.0012844465,0.08114584,0.885658,0.00035991354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04778475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3360623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88305044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054010615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002469852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2718497283","doi":"10.21991/c9b37r","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, I : quelles sont les voies de recours extraordinaires contre un arrêt de la Cour suprême?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.03809130245330594,"score_gpt":0.3435488994852651,"score_spread":0.3054575970319592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2718497283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3091152,0.06090269,0.10968267,0.2681801,0.007522696,0.0014977294,0.0017704796,0.0005558538,0.24077258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815129,0.004843616,0.0041678697,0.00066436914,0.0009487206,0.000105999105,0.000036654597,0.000033898308,0.0076859673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368155,0.0008823447,0.00091062486,0.0009488742,0.0008477553,0.002728868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524266,0.001591178,0.00069549464,0.0008276848,0.0006026418,0.0010403595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031422814,0.0007960002,0.000805975,0.00021638058,0.015803082,0.0012519863,0.0016496464,0.0010627718,0.0010947064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004396064,0.00086546584,0.00070957065,0.0002303911,0.04975315,0.001896451,0.00040756667,0.001082773,0.00021347815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013980179,0.00031655366,0.14243048,0.000113097434,0.00022007193,0.00034072722,0.0012731084,0.00083205296,0.00021724662,0.81121725,0.022790873,0.02010872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015649532,0.00011853805,0.014799613,0.0018553096,0.0005501843,0.0014725262,0.030384101,0.00090333767,0.00062211056,0.18947099,0.75703233,0.0012260205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072018616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047758225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001944313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010025288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273134675","doi":"","title":"Independent Legal Representation for Victims: Not a Leg to Stand on: The Unconstitutionality of New Brunswick Regulation 84-20, Section 2 (D)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Obligation; Context (archaeology); Law; Representation (politics); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03531820220026055,"score_gpt":0.3300077164312087,"score_spread":0.29468951423094814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273134675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7816709,0.00046231135,0.15291382,0.053885452,0.00094703364,0.0009516602,0.000007838621,0.000040661853,0.009120258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921813,0.00009708085,0.00009477392,0.00010962595,0.0013393827,0.000005082812,0.0000036634058,0.0000054711973,0.006163643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810463,0.0001585362,0.00029807066,0.00017004344,0.000602052,0.0006666381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919397,0.00019245967,0.00020603226,0.00011303797,0.00023003865,0.000064458865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027330304,0.00008355976,0.000112205336,0.00006646823,0.00073826785,0.000101154896,0.00017162072,0.00006779491,0.00004207043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025926396,0.00006665783,0.0001050468,0.00024272222,0.00009943156,0.0003552148,0.0000120959985,0.00040096694,0.0000052026385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033328126,0.000036659607,0.0011267628,0.000004076494,0.00002231972,3.2935912e-7,0.0006194304,0.0021310572,0.0009034315,0.9901606,0.0023629735,0.0022990864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012569822,0.0008687081,0.02408994,0.00013781493,0.00012688994,0.0000873038,0.012875379,0.00021038817,0.0035561055,0.7390698,0.2173808,0.00033984333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024263747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17835654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25109076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011718738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006790385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737160251","doi":"10.7202/1040521ar","title":"L’infraction d’attroupement illégal dans la régulation de la manifestation : un embarras pour la théorie pénale","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017449872015139894,"score_gpt":0.30184238898507276,"score_spread":0.28439251696993284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737160251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77300346,0.00023194052,0.0048422734,0.013083093,0.0006604962,0.00023574855,0.000019220517,0.000060358216,0.20786339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98011094,0.0012861897,0.0015349406,0.00008087396,0.0012300157,0.000032322685,0.000019101788,0.000030389108,0.015675215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765193,0.0007343351,0.00033489877,0.00038126044,0.00036579953,0.0005317421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820983,0.00060328585,0.00042553843,0.00042437768,0.00011627824,0.00022066516],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002201195,0.00017500842,0.00022860052,0.000055559747,0.0013073626,0.00057645486,0.0004344622,0.00036963032,0.00035513265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051511533,0.00026774855,0.00016623788,0.00011321736,0.0005885276,0.001067211,0.00007396175,0.00035953167,0.0002199755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009480201,0.00042221192,0.09240002,0.00040418725,0.00009019248,0.0005091058,0.030280324,0.0010806074,0.005419202,0.7949251,0.0020849493,0.07228931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066785363,0.000102153674,0.57698756,0.0006464692,0.0003815685,0.0003961882,0.0063784663,0.004986153,0.0010375996,0.33809274,0.06974958,0.00057366164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056999787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017505644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48458752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093637005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003344236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738361053","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2017.20.3.391","title":"Mandatory Sentencing Around the World and the Need for Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09892597009970915,"score_gpt":0.39100292239636747,"score_spread":0.2920769522966583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738361053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036999271,0.16199893,0.00013613112,0.4228654,0.0009976276,0.0028883044,0.0000074605514,0.000066772394,0.40733945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79225147,0.11943159,0.0009087757,0.04951175,0.0036985928,0.00027563542,0.000004789039,0.000044037293,0.03387335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987842,0.00014462417,0.00024639087,0.00020929248,0.00030857584,0.00030692897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985692,0.00041710367,0.00022665608,0.0005749071,0.000088268185,0.0001238585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027726134,0.00012807692,0.00030415304,0.000009758382,0.003778182,0.00042519803,0.00078190863,0.000032166696,0.000063828236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051766424,0.00006343255,0.00016099685,0.000049534552,0.0012759236,0.00038512194,0.00012569386,0.00015287017,0.000025044828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004794306,0.00000456442,0.000017965896,0.0006308769,0.00001089213,0.0000018865486,0.0008598914,2.7091128e-8,0.0000021106312,0.9516627,0.012593792,0.03416735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002792809,0.000017882763,0.00012993264,0.0016287657,0.00037671995,0.000007648018,0.0019696609,0.0000049648465,0.0000073147266,0.007498538,0.9879759,0.00010341021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04289961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075453736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007875207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012572705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738620536","doi":"","title":"Anti-terrorism, the Charter, and International Law","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Charter; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Fundamental rights; Terrorism; Reservation of rights; Guard (computer science); Duty; Ex post facto law; Right to property; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04597458160345978,"score_gpt":0.297171645317838,"score_spread":0.2511970637143782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738620536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23270108,0.049459387,0.001305631,0.24719428,0.010674961,0.00059619267,0.000107094966,0.00013203343,0.45782936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809691,0.0035530874,0.00018428294,0.00046549484,0.002137091,0.000013440761,0.000011736948,0.0000072583935,0.012658557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873567,0.00012738885,0.00029578546,0.0003106661,0.00021553005,0.00031497967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928856,0.00022269094,0.00011749469,0.00018400286,0.00010648752,0.00008078731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042043533,0.00017318502,0.00019205833,0.00003327123,0.0011125609,0.00026262505,0.00035254107,0.00012721086,0.000338307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053419124,0.00014773835,0.00009919218,0.00016251205,0.004041246,0.00049171865,0.000098525314,0.00017885119,0.0001753702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054803922,0.00008454837,0.0016415064,0.000043562533,0.00002823956,0.00002360991,0.0013563719,0.000087156615,0.00008914327,0.9915377,0.0023714888,0.0027312206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018219663,0.000019796622,0.0017265837,0.00034228634,0.00008754598,0.00011468204,0.0031063007,0.00027073553,0.000041443276,0.017257893,0.9766321,0.00021841512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006417885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007956574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97427976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096731084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011362227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739629923","doi":"","title":"L’arrêt Lampe Berger c. Pot pourri Accent de la Cour d’appel et sa portée devant les tribunaux québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stress (linguistics); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03257755887388797,"score_gpt":0.32833022139577406,"score_spread":0.2957526625218861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739629923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6741653,0.02438925,0.009941895,0.08080095,0.002544414,0.0011448198,0.00010269294,0.00026697884,0.20664372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055036,0.0104526505,0.0019303666,0.0016726635,0.0007054723,0.000065828535,0.0000129993105,0.00009836939,0.079558074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938944,0.001670488,0.0007780412,0.0009332845,0.000936354,0.0017874446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954939,0.0016177417,0.0006514391,0.0010463345,0.0004078805,0.00078274513],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048107603,0.00067680114,0.00076224783,0.00016339254,0.004267635,0.0010793429,0.001991376,0.0013145215,0.0033770015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064084856,0.0006618424,0.0005707233,0.00030963775,0.0052499897,0.000714615,0.00042671725,0.002107119,0.00048322955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010311622,0.0012653064,0.026371686,0.00078266143,0.00058383,0.0009147972,0.12991633,0.0002827184,0.002683494,0.38887185,0.13161619,0.31568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006925611,0.00025822464,0.0048618726,0.00057710806,0.00033836724,0.00015610509,0.019365506,0.0008283243,0.004226533,0.014857439,0.9528651,0.0009728451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104947284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041206896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82124895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018428996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024229297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741565324","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Legal Research: Provincial Regulations Table","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Political science; Business; Public administration; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.2791761825938271,"score_gpt":0.48689408571267234,"score_spread":0.20771790311884525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741565324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057331903,0.00040975006,0.0000034098916,0.06371713,0.002068895,0.001075442,0.00019205925,0.00011363552,0.9318464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025287163,0.00044769404,0.0010045697,0.0003273495,0.010270829,0.0001635498,0.00015867373,0.00006602592,0.96227413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905595,0.0015851529,0.0005102047,0.0008398608,0.0039005368,0.0026047132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922374,0.001714074,0.00007983314,0.00091837434,0.0037010394,0.0013492877],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019702885,0.00024441877,0.0003620107,0.0014935716,0.007868194,0.0016216902,0.0022092739,0.0013940292,0.009083566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009927353,0.0002373292,0.00012563207,0.0021640537,0.0030492423,0.00075167674,0.00032884834,0.0041483985,0.0015228288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058040014,0.00001491511,0.000030508045,0.0000322234,0.0000067849173,0.0000412038,0.0012975862,5.19062e-7,0.000014003418,0.26002806,0.7373333,0.0011951058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047266578,0.00005568415,0.00009491954,0.00015491091,0.000011505521,0.0000028271843,0.00688099,0.0000050100625,0.000035521396,0.009357843,0.9830689,0.00028463863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99642235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25067022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016258253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038395435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743809315","doi":"","title":"Innocence Canada Becoming ‘Shadow of its Former Self’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Shadow (psychology); Self representation; Art; Political science; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Humanities","score_opus":0.03894593149147545,"score_gpt":0.3054877400766108,"score_spread":0.2665418085851353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743809315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.531187,0.00022094329,0.0005511031,0.034411207,0.0005981258,0.00021898828,0.000010127629,0.000079136786,0.43272337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991946,0.00009072641,0.00027213298,0.00025230317,0.00005076258,0.000001909932,6.778899e-8,0.000002222324,0.007383916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993146,0.000023868757,0.00011321812,0.00009160263,0.00025864865,0.00019806476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995321,0.00017762357,0.00004164946,0.00007330971,0.00010092148,0.000074372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023307705,0.000041125026,0.000071577866,0.000013203633,0.00013563485,0.000008414281,0.00017941551,0.000024566594,0.0008763302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020871668,0.000026455318,0.00001759903,0.00010452668,0.000055811062,0.00022247877,0.000025188847,0.00002026758,0.00002024966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024073035,0.000060128925,0.047422882,0.00008944002,0.00002710159,0.000013506093,0.009446709,0.0000010152049,0.0056708204,0.76023173,0.09627973,0.08073284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022726091,0.00004098636,0.009618544,0.00019122692,0.00001818275,0.0000015712355,0.005428919,0.00001284568,0.01819275,0.0019330698,0.9640573,0.00027731483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.840756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9777868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101672784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006290777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9595201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27479547","doi":"10.1111/jdi.12558","title":"“The Slow Creep of Complacency”: Ongoing Challenges for Democracies Seeking to Detain Terrorism Suspects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legislature; Safeguarding; Government (linguistics); Terrorism; Law; Civil liberties; Supreme court; Judicial review; Politics; Criminal justice; Medicine","score_opus":0.04308377382002733,"score_gpt":0.3170399035795467,"score_spread":0.2739561297595194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27479547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672981,0.0005667431,0.00026719522,0.030197589,0.0008126232,0.00018695675,0.0000012273331,0.000010085668,0.00065950846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376744,0.000089011446,0.0053641493,0.00012156143,0.00057263573,0.0000060540824,3.5182796e-7,0.000007817627,0.000071002934],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998713,0.00012683812,0.00040066184,0.00009316874,0.00041050062,0.00025583853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997555,0.0012345358,0.00047736178,0.000110577115,0.00045504453,0.00016744943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002892239,0.000081297105,0.00018516109,0.00008836494,0.0005796047,0.00008551376,0.00033192485,0.00006998491,0.000004731264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037310917,0.000063082094,0.00009476091,0.00014039839,0.00032564916,0.00038444792,0.000026854153,0.00019699405,0.0000017634238],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008571989,0.000103372564,0.11163475,0.00040248208,0.0001468676,0.0000036063248,0.0937679,0.00023600184,0.4581695,0.20794411,0.0057120016,0.121793695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014101345,0.0020852007,0.16510312,0.0022204644,0.00041037108,0.000012195363,0.06931613,0.0027418833,0.1910896,0.37954566,0.18508095,0.000984286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003602932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2670799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017541005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44667348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748649386","doi":"","title":"for Retaining and Destroying Personal Information Privacy and Insurance in Canada, England, and France – How Does the Responsible Insurer Put Guidelines and Procedures in Place","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03103617864427241,"score_gpt":0.28676317742012164,"score_spread":0.25572699877584926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748649386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92976034,0.0029969418,0.000004027227,0.06700742,0.000043424476,0.000113628936,0.000008755439,0.0000016741025,0.000063777254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998654,0.0007508076,0.00028490904,0.00024848612,0.000031496438,0.0000045934607,1.35936e-7,0.0000024627373,0.000023123606],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999452,0.000027916085,0.00016583558,0.000085060856,0.00007122224,0.00019799516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941677,0.00013779759,0.00015131656,0.000057110006,0.000120705816,0.00011632885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000691307,0.000066988236,0.00014440341,0.00012727096,0.000739325,0.00019808402,0.00012280952,0.00008068322,4.951031e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019320694,0.000047434118,0.0000052314626,0.00005441577,0.0006179675,0.00055997627,0.000024102228,0.00016635316,8.538569e-9],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037972422,7.285424e-7,0.9574767,0.000050762363,0.000004297999,0.000022606393,0.007094451,7.5674865e-7,0.000022153517,0.013969623,0.00006918985,0.021250777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016701752,0.00014920517,0.7749707,0.0006863873,0.000017711753,0.00034529087,0.018436277,0.00023902403,0.00009092557,0.011132768,0.19201843,0.00024311438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5748942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99556637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42067215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048704816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001410684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5686365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748742866","doi":"10.14288/1.0351981","title":"Democratic rights on trial : judicial reasoning, charter litigation, and the shaping of Canadian democracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.026687097387287556,"score_gpt":0.23725385394117351,"score_spread":0.21056675655388596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748742866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721918,0.000039911203,0.0000072651615,0.0045249294,0.00018713293,0.00028700844,0.000018995444,0.000008904609,0.022734052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895895,0.0000906605,0.00004522315,0.000055113,0.00014668884,3.6086027e-7,0.0000014115407,0.0000028532609,0.00069872616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918187,0.00012166934,0.000094576026,0.0001735095,0.00023812361,0.00019025688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999204,0.00011418687,0.0001900549,0.00020604464,0.00013924696,0.00014648768],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006128486,0.000026802814,0.00017881364,0.00004366607,0.0032555154,0.00020000765,0.00039154963,0.000069997535,0.000071640505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003287382,0.000065070504,0.00006640084,0.000090645124,0.0015127728,0.00036890933,0.000041864227,0.00008554283,0.0000048484244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003993847,0.00032954552,0.05264562,0.00023230327,0.0003148678,0.000501809,0.06600776,0.000004684991,0.00006625259,0.033823363,0.08552784,0.7565521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005918302,0.000083718274,0.9666926,0.0003397876,0.00006393851,0.0000035475105,0.002523437,0.000052873413,5.5223654e-7,0.02178987,0.0024163215,0.000115053546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004799575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022993833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750765677","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3013748","title":"Reconsidering Calder: Re-Evaluating the Rule of Absolute Exclusion in the Context of Real Evidence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.19563002219356074,"score_gpt":0.4177824146193639,"score_spread":0.22215239242580315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750765677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746453,0.002729103,0.00004885214,0.019434195,0.00015464588,0.0001573206,4.7206942e-7,0.0000039492134,0.0028261656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873709,0.012069487,0.000035310455,0.0000695504,0.00017989904,0.0000032741802,6.651784e-8,0.0000051277066,0.0002664043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974681,0.00052548153,0.00038306572,0.00012375246,0.0005990055,0.00090060476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980075,0.0008750452,0.0005970666,0.00034046525,0.00014821682,0.000031725165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016520603,0.00007810415,0.00017322606,0.000034932254,0.0015103507,0.00010162865,0.00107118,0.000052925556,0.000027460208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026697193,0.000047461355,0.00010002971,0.00008268106,0.00042782532,0.00043799347,0.00009311695,0.00086459244,0.0000029460002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005363436,0.0001329913,0.024842845,0.000077729135,0.000107001855,0.000019652955,0.25281125,0.00009522093,0.0125004,0.3173334,0.00045821263,0.39108494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011366899,0.0015663361,0.06507322,0.0024946914,0.00021172826,0.00023996642,0.533677,0.00061740505,0.0013418078,0.39026925,0.0029042829,0.0004676734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017180324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13429843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39061728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028984135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019302564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755346295","doi":"","title":"Happy Sisyphus: A Review Article of G Palmer and a Butler, a Constitution for Aotearoa New Zealand","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Legislation; Democracy; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Habeas corpus; Constitutional law; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10949296423553974,"score_gpt":0.42939616545898396,"score_spread":0.31990320122344423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755346295","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005016821,0.9963579,0.00018275382,0.0018219016,0.00013810876,0.00071949227,0.000007762371,0.000009538423,0.0007575234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000069820635,0.9898192,0.00006691021,0.000038347174,0.0004784225,0.00001965128,0.0000027682627,0.00001182544,0.0094930185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750066,0.00020519702,0.000526797,0.00022471366,0.00029253325,0.0012501258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849856,0.00023090583,0.00076814735,0.00020098244,0.00012070601,0.00018069982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038025258,0.00019831343,0.0010298771,0.00006273193,0.0005291477,0.00010396492,0.00038934604,0.0001671739,0.000033024276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001126096,0.00015347333,0.00040015846,0.00010051365,0.00032515574,0.00022846695,0.0000334793,0.0008439886,0.000012249033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044456,0.00001578494,0.0000042685947,0.003360976,0.00011203299,0.0000013768624,0.00018305061,2.2370159e-8,3.046602e-7,0.05833363,0.0041336175,0.9338445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015098065,0.00011506376,6.275489e-7,0.027650017,0.0010228292,0.00017256434,0.00010335513,2.7976412e-7,1.4027309e-7,0.03554659,0.9350805,0.00015700514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001712055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038555562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003732838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010798343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756895187","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1013","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Twenty Years Later","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03437041727917637,"score_gpt":0.30895696503574077,"score_spread":0.2745865477565644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756895187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08702484,0.3424586,0.0000068161453,0.12931287,0.0014907175,0.002216141,0.00003864374,0.00008394483,0.4373674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95112944,0.045782782,0.000019673627,0.0012567688,0.00011445847,0.000009642923,0.0000016249074,0.000004885301,0.0016806984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910086,0.00011232139,0.00016915143,0.00011971106,0.00023745658,0.0002604844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944735,0.000067742694,0.00004866181,0.0001887358,0.000079772566,0.0001677712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085970067,0.000065140885,0.00015718912,0.0000105936115,0.00053499656,0.000055241813,0.00022071092,0.00004015537,0.00040104412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004224626,0.000043227727,0.000053876454,0.0000958476,0.0004885194,0.00012383654,0.000020014879,0.00007149071,0.000078515994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010568087,0.000025289468,0.0039840913,0.00045624212,0.000046761605,0.000053494452,0.0030153708,1.542016e-7,0.000013872048,0.8581985,0.110453315,0.023742342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033079814,0.000010064836,0.0011790375,0.00052766065,0.000030846535,0.0000031806492,0.000024467825,7.5635387e-7,0.000003108889,0.0032493407,0.99487627,0.000062173196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52231175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9426516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88442296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004203142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094223375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48086923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757321729","doi":"10.15353/lsuj.v2i0.159","title":"The Difficult Progression of the Rights of Canada's Indigenous Peoples and the Obligation of Fiduciary Duty Indigenous Rights in the Canadian Legal Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Political science; Fiduciary; Indigenous; Law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Obligation; Public administration; Duty; Sociology; History; Art","score_opus":0.020770043581391767,"score_gpt":0.30592120540273327,"score_spread":0.2851511618213415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757321729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343243,0.0035140088,7.070862e-7,0.05867129,0.0005153974,0.00053378113,0.0000115065195,0.0000019029621,0.0024270648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841815,0.0010602791,0.000005952656,0.00008619037,0.00014480155,0.0000100510915,3.4585227e-7,0.0000038213097,0.00027040546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972492,0.000725947,0.0005028867,0.0001300011,0.0009615041,0.00043048948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732137,0.0008875265,0.00094280724,0.00031479434,0.00044480147,0.00008871199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023565677,0.00014590025,0.0003218213,0.000040273393,0.012897367,0.00032367316,0.0010864373,0.00006225653,0.0000013361349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074929895,0.00005451801,0.00009833998,0.0001795801,0.002510304,0.00025882828,0.00010413011,0.00042374857,1.4714324e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005114891,0.0001871251,0.04477159,0.00013779734,0.00063827686,0.00012266361,0.580799,0.000058816393,0.000047288864,0.3542858,0.008461423,0.009978725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028118477,0.000410746,0.58935446,0.0015782134,0.00043353523,0.00022135492,0.18817739,0.000028246788,0.0009917358,0.10757626,0.10786965,0.0005465629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5445829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003263449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025687178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757418413","doi":"10.29173/mlj992","title":"Beyond Finality: R v Hart and the Ghosts of Convictions Past","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04547843127892877,"score_gpt":0.32821503313180866,"score_spread":0.2827366018528799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757418413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69871104,0.0005709002,0.00009828593,0.06429169,0.0013151786,0.00018194434,0.0000076915285,0.000014851763,0.23480842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984597,0.0002636445,0.00007622926,0.00026623596,0.0007283058,0.0000018729983,1.3954764e-7,0.0000032344606,0.0002006297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991742,0.00014376568,0.00016493638,0.000074967276,0.0002777895,0.00016437087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.00015405874,0.0002159505,0.00018823637,0.00012599392,0.00009071661],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013293393,0.00005534759,0.00012434018,0.000012982478,0.0048748804,0.00050089904,0.00036583474,0.00003665034,0.00009118243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019599673,0.000037175596,0.000066024964,0.00002124387,0.0017772058,0.00036166693,0.000070761,0.00018061878,0.0000131143115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006492668,0.000023968325,0.012957974,0.000008906218,0.000026816826,0.00001723654,0.0037938752,5.657626e-7,0.00002225131,0.96704555,0.0037302014,0.012307712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014336983,0.000087895554,0.10052076,0.00014021165,0.00017656173,0.00019932662,0.061938226,0.000012479864,0.000108369044,0.19440186,0.6407737,0.0002068839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04917333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25294447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7726437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022993652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037376158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757932447","doi":"","title":"Differentiation of Approachesof Legal Regulation of Rights and Freedomsof Citizens in the Regional Legislation of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.060125091860794184,"score_gpt":0.2798606843094278,"score_spread":0.2197355924486336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757932447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670303,0.00020410861,0.00089534244,0.00081433466,0.00003852751,0.00021488713,0.000002971939,0.0000011734905,0.030798377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952435,0.0000146561315,0.0003033378,0.00002360573,0.000060832816,0.0000021823428,0.0000032727937,0.0000014823065,0.000066281245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860257,0.00023119447,0.0005111199,0.00007183861,0.00049510394,0.0000881961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984684,0.000272625,0.0007584772,0.000062532294,0.00040093684,0.000037054782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056570565,0.0000701522,0.00024614242,0.00007184024,0.00011975534,0.000025200714,0.00009479794,0.000044583903,0.000024705318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026798205,0.000049139875,0.000040682964,0.00014730805,0.00037056932,0.00058631605,0.0000085289985,0.00009112642,5.9092653e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069404094,0.000044869423,0.005396091,0.000016677925,0.000018996547,2.9212814e-7,0.010848821,0.00023266397,0.0009994451,0.9813779,0.0008070195,0.00018780923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001238709,0.0003514779,0.7225609,0.00025776293,0.00007883182,0.000016678812,0.014640344,0.0051436564,0.0019286539,0.2492026,0.0044074403,0.00017295576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11993239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19807975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7321753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035387213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001378321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88592803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757998191","doi":"","title":"Why Don't We Have the Same Driving Laws All Across Canada?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04726410821943143,"score_gpt":0.3370061482359869,"score_spread":0.28974204001655546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757998191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21268605,0.0001824149,0.00030268473,0.69293815,0.00065820897,0.00017868784,0.000009190175,0.00007704578,0.09296755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515852,0.00013849416,0.000039286453,0.0072169164,0.00023916856,0.0000051699167,1.3801157e-7,0.000004564227,0.040771063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988871,0.000081676924,0.000101004975,0.00014896477,0.00036989758,0.00041134606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991517,0.0004739753,0.00003320137,0.00017469801,0.000050415685,0.00011600031],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005295546,0.000066320885,0.00007480782,0.000003171762,0.0006070855,0.00009947966,0.00038787458,0.000037499292,0.0010289137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022689618,0.000031882577,0.000035932026,0.000051543895,0.00025095043,0.00018755134,0.0000723042,0.000052342115,0.00004062282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072830658,0.000013209714,0.018296491,0.0000054299308,0.00001652545,0.000017198248,0.019219078,0.0000011254002,0.00047901002,0.056498885,0.87327385,0.03217191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003962567,0.000005858103,0.001964805,0.00002559104,0.000004357447,7.906532e-7,0.0111992825,0.0000018366712,0.00019004953,0.0008440738,0.98564523,0.000078499535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97353905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99959046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7388992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014766034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002119302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759548624","doi":"","title":"Public acts of the Province of British Columbia ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History; Political science","score_opus":0.02771289158840725,"score_gpt":0.23230732494993322,"score_spread":0.20459443336152597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759548624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23793024,0.00015294646,0.0000017451459,0.0035662693,0.00027726084,0.00031745588,0.00020308542,0.000010646587,0.75754035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255779,0.0003398917,0.00005128998,0.000087091874,0.000081028425,0.000006711949,5.1780796e-7,0.000008239311,0.07384736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986786,0.000109005465,0.0002986164,0.00015723822,0.00039723678,0.00035927648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883753,0.00016022752,0.00020593336,0.00028087478,0.0002057902,0.00030965003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043603772,0.00005796849,0.0001954745,0.000066007386,0.00015991567,0.00003363724,0.0005900478,0.00008760055,0.000339336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067090336,0.00005928906,0.00009105764,0.00025403537,0.0007401254,0.00023185268,0.000040781935,0.00005478439,0.0000041504522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014093505,0.00009522201,0.2597224,0.0002501251,0.00005669298,0.00004648675,0.0023851318,4.20516e-7,0.0005583023,0.24115305,0.34164533,0.15407273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009627262,0.00002682089,0.07218074,0.00018213519,0.000014378701,0.0000015642428,0.00018394635,7.2112954e-8,0.000046100475,0.0016243694,0.92555606,0.00008755754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96723247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68764764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110829234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028695539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50904655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759909679","doi":"","title":"Update '94: what's new in the law?: Calgary, Alberta, June 17, 1994, Edmonton, Alberta, June 20, 1994.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01592067519406207,"score_gpt":0.25243587210328444,"score_spread":0.23651519690922237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759909679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006245759,0.0017509582,0.0000067474184,0.09975891,0.0015516501,0.00072260725,0.000033991346,0.000026844327,0.88990253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1983621,0.008325074,0.0002464525,0.00924038,0.0016518699,0.000089908965,0.000042898955,0.000076419085,0.7819649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657184,0.0003062352,0.00064558163,0.0005486896,0.0007126729,0.0012149574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970737,0.0009139573,0.00020142325,0.0007141357,0.000060064893,0.0010366826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008986435,0.00034135152,0.000467748,0.0003105778,0.000497305,0.00021938319,0.001290443,0.00026912594,0.0013020727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028358155,0.0002466412,0.00018506165,0.00052918965,0.00065148075,0.0013111965,0.00006292457,0.0002529544,0.0002364199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041482777,0.00004081484,0.0012849657,0.000021806081,0.00002851421,0.0000901898,0.013311814,0.0000017121554,0.000022339418,0.41634583,0.54108727,0.027723284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036716225,0.00003861491,0.000937302,0.00021070908,0.000052674273,0.0000067327337,0.0013797866,0.0000012969955,0.000017886,0.005186214,0.99141616,0.0003854401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99241525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45032895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031937004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017935804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759974795","doi":"","title":"The Canadian justice system : an overview","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06351832421984444,"score_gpt":0.3109475986053553,"score_spread":0.24742927438551088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759974795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061724028,0.0015843904,0.0000019616718,0.012512799,0.0010106633,0.00032856752,0.00009210656,0.000043471202,0.97825366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627657,0.0033638973,0.00006537715,0.00053584215,0.0006459205,0.000028262619,0.000002468419,0.000021973945,0.03257055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801016,0.00022920614,0.0002859133,0.00024025541,0.00041093738,0.0008235025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729306,0.0003168299,0.000095209674,0.00043280327,0.00018250616,0.0016796148],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065728,0.00013632601,0.00018144569,0.00021633589,0.0018583562,0.00010785156,0.00071557966,0.00013271382,0.00014769113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003764244,0.00009130974,0.000070747075,0.00027537896,0.00040753154,0.00030347906,0.000016287588,0.00009007419,0.00012024024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004149233,0.0000024407866,0.0009050103,0.00004693995,0.000008487099,0.000034048102,0.0014297043,3.006008e-7,0.0000030197418,0.9511191,0.019595154,0.026851626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065197695,0.000025418596,0.0045558847,0.00013835367,0.000063551444,0.0000034709672,0.0019087474,0.0000011652379,0.0000030332658,0.00085093273,0.9922252,0.00015900304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99803466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010111538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051819147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760474255","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1312","title":"Punitive in Effect: Reflections on Canada v. Whaling","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Whaling; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.13946561486101672,"score_gpt":0.41382715313013757,"score_spread":0.27436153826912085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760474255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009114372,0.05996563,0.000012599588,0.04445495,0.0014023883,0.0013448828,0.00001443237,0.00009148466,0.8835993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98295045,0.010497661,0.000037350146,0.005468016,0.00020170143,0.000058167956,0.0000068421264,0.000010392274,0.0007694448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843335,0.00046404486,0.00019405418,0.00017964847,0.00045312487,0.0002757528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991869,0.0002644272,0.000049351143,0.00016311285,0.00014965521,0.00018660794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016346071,0.00009821754,0.00024402628,0.000019297646,0.00023547813,0.00003264222,0.00018939134,0.000038159982,0.00012013601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080715667,0.00008664363,0.00003991354,0.00030821725,0.00009291088,0.00016076028,0.000022807126,0.00017143853,0.0000816004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000451173,0.0000861945,0.00081562094,0.0013639104,0.00002447001,0.00015942348,0.0031789714,0.000030956602,0.00001837472,0.83041567,0.15154825,0.012313068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007714182,0.00005356729,0.00003796687,0.0028034425,0.000025814621,0.0000018792598,0.00035677795,0.0000012221041,0.000019482994,0.00049931207,0.99601513,0.00010828522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9040624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98927087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97383606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051093876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007715044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35332248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760898809","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Evidence Revolution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.05757881699764225,"score_gpt":0.3145149915663895,"score_spread":0.2569361745687473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760898809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11961776,0.0009095304,0.00044903945,0.24174416,0.000683041,0.00039470528,7.0068864e-7,0.00011750205,0.63608354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96867496,0.00009016334,0.0002254206,0.0009739321,0.00010914062,0.0000073749334,1.1652975e-7,0.0000013902782,0.029917495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937934,0.00004575598,0.000065476044,0.000084061125,0.0002562284,0.00016915968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996044,0.00011890192,0.00001610911,0.00007877869,0.00008898749,0.00009283499],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000201203,0.00002982481,0.000037762682,0.0000075500234,0.0002539781,0.000040842966,0.00013221167,0.000019809282,0.0033498353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042272816,0.000025741281,0.000012256728,0.000073001145,0.00006190099,0.00041579606,0.000014521716,0.000032693737,0.00032312627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.958187e-7,0.0000031349937,0.0028443348,0.000004359495,9.997526e-7,0.0000011514167,0.00046847502,0.0000011206009,0.00015365584,0.08329504,0.9078156,0.005411243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015035753,0.000008944469,0.034878384,0.000043441814,0.0000038501653,5.3201717e-7,0.0022065167,0.000031864372,0.00007842905,0.0019199898,0.96072143,0.00009156306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99905396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99755555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017849909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010478431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761177664","doi":"","title":"Practical statutes being a collection of statutes of practical utility in force in Ontario, with notes on the construction [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statute of limitations; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05534061644859097,"score_gpt":0.31583801123410676,"score_spread":0.2604973947855158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761177664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64254826,0.0000054558964,0.0002075368,0.001694712,0.00006405342,0.00027564893,0.000004807135,0.000010874836,0.35518864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675745,0.00008014259,0.0023771564,0.00003530897,0.000024991334,0.0000051367842,7.130716e-7,0.000009736036,0.00070934807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979621,0.00071640906,0.00045187323,0.00022142477,0.00041785967,0.00023032686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964406,0.002884722,0.0002993408,0.00019133001,0.00012943722,0.000054588796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015824973,0.00011195839,0.00023427604,0.00006737438,0.00010045851,0.000013317323,0.00012121601,0.00004379483,0.000092358045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014853007,0.000067838315,0.0000430693,0.00015330288,0.0010231697,0.00038319753,0.00004406063,0.00020521876,0.0000027760163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084378535,0.00023563649,0.14872289,0.000039456387,0.00001668074,0.000029007939,0.010090025,0.0000026458322,0.00052452576,0.8375829,0.00018070989,0.0017317542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033835764,0.0031421697,0.7799875,0.0032461977,0.00022700163,0.00004680881,0.015989281,0.00003139854,0.011908997,0.046586167,0.13450979,0.00094108476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114665255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4032759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79099673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012116424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049927254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8912303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762100885","doi":"","title":"Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.05040988705811547,"score_gpt":0.31326511768894577,"score_spread":0.26285523063083027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762100885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27045843,0.00007904434,0.000001761105,0.0026402182,0.0007595309,0.00023194005,0.000007093168,0.000008907488,0.7258131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175143,0.00010794369,0.00004025669,0.00015206679,0.0003161199,0.000015351701,0.0000014901036,0.0000066872476,0.007608661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850357,0.0002225359,0.0002492026,0.00018606949,0.00044931532,0.0003892953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870855,0.00022870694,0.00016552952,0.00055089756,0.00006558244,0.00028071363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012630483,0.00011058384,0.00018943675,0.00018124956,0.0013363023,0.00013285271,0.001061351,0.00010925387,0.0000869541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043116973,0.00008690999,0.000056623,0.000116830844,0.00022367031,0.00022217524,0.000022369082,0.00024013601,0.00006997696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083096566,0.00006022097,0.016207064,0.0007440024,0.000012751112,0.0006476845,0.24000013,0.00003386135,0.000013034992,0.6875626,0.044317447,0.0103180995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016655837,0.000057665096,0.051099382,0.0006730096,0.00012540036,0.000015645266,0.038307488,0.000006437513,0.0000047987846,0.00013029309,0.90924776,0.0001655935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006180929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001212609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762203183","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Manitoba : passed in the sessions held in the ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.036981732594829834,"score_gpt":0.2855283085431455,"score_spread":0.24854657594831564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762203183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4050342,0.00015849898,0.0000019606443,0.021211097,0.00013843848,0.00035701177,0.000044824457,0.000005353973,0.5730486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751425,0.0005716603,0.000034192457,0.00054768065,0.0000897708,0.000027303106,0.0000010396049,0.0000048190996,0.0012092707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986231,0.00030997186,0.00025275737,0.00012680428,0.00034126252,0.00034612956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986455,0.00087654596,0.00007643104,0.00025460313,0.000040893385,0.00010604478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010732501,0.00007859421,0.00014039091,0.00019481742,0.00014153575,0.000018721155,0.0006220058,0.000064853564,0.00008007298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039171663,0.00004132586,0.00004699817,0.00036339872,0.00027266264,0.00014800072,0.000014349983,0.000100410965,0.000007561059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024907344,0.00008182107,0.18630108,0.000044433094,0.000009597806,0.00010825543,0.05627513,0.0000018308573,0.00013275006,0.6770958,0.046303138,0.03362132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012761353,0.000030172292,0.18372259,0.00013181717,0.00000908247,9.3230824e-7,0.017260186,2.3818079e-7,0.000016570173,0.005594874,0.79301935,0.00008657233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87404984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99756676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7467162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008563795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078816176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16852196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762417814","doi":"","title":"Alberta Law Conference: [papers]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02666860447666757,"score_gpt":0.2635985025117345,"score_spread":0.23692989803506692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762417814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009627271,0.00007222859,0.000002174594,0.011303022,0.00032676585,0.00016454347,0.00003153125,0.000022124734,0.97845036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8300214,0.00056531926,0.000076569566,0.0006384421,0.00023816626,0.000012145251,0.0000019201207,0.000011965048,0.16843408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998558,0.00008645239,0.00023553737,0.00024067561,0.00032406545,0.00055529043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985387,0.00029364036,0.00007577115,0.00026486657,0.00011108328,0.00071594125],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029389377,0.0001276689,0.0002011533,0.0001508107,0.00033246685,0.00003661121,0.0004184683,0.00013033698,0.002630478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027410325,0.0001013353,0.00007965295,0.0001635546,0.0005890112,0.00024647315,0.00002263292,0.000068428955,0.00019440016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062846316,0.0000058021155,0.0017822906,0.000008003428,0.000008141536,0.00001122299,0.0020720314,5.696245e-8,0.00006888097,0.9681871,0.017842956,0.010007258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118784716,0.000027837861,0.0015393988,0.00007299115,0.000017106746,0.0000012698262,0.0004260835,1.1639702e-7,0.000046661262,0.0050821113,0.9924939,0.00017370732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9645058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015844978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011354203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762635708","doi":"10.7202/1021634ar","title":"La légalité du boycottage","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.035407117974855594,"score_gpt":0.2918102839284494,"score_spread":0.2564031659535938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762635708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118015066,0.0050108368,0.0025413705,0.13280636,0.0017719192,0.00018550576,0.000018188317,0.00010862771,0.7395421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8685502,0.00082534354,0.00022110323,0.00018012286,0.0011013366,0.000007093379,0.0000061414908,0.000013491949,0.12909521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980613,0.0007368464,0.00028510706,0.00024862925,0.00032071455,0.00034741827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806243,0.0013119899,0.00011463288,0.00023959094,0.00008609657,0.00018526409],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012507696,0.00014836724,0.00016178115,0.00006169835,0.0008543047,0.00011697775,0.0002601223,0.0006260448,0.0022901753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001182841,0.00016154278,0.00010218862,0.0005765105,0.0007998989,0.0004028286,0.000058388458,0.0005736469,0.0020030383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028658217,0.000066224806,0.008095849,0.000003494862,0.000015778252,0.000005726944,0.0047506513,0.00023300515,0.000003718985,0.7628237,0.101017825,0.122981146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012240272,0.000034634722,0.002644252,0.00016647404,0.0000791083,0.00000913287,0.0040541375,0.0006525696,0.000017572276,0.0057189832,0.98631155,0.000189205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027540647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040795215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8852937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012491437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023894297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762669912","doi":"","title":"City of Ontario v. Quon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cases | US Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; History","score_opus":0.09876655245041216,"score_gpt":0.34246684105417313,"score_spread":0.24370028860376097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762669912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5394324,0.00014981313,0.0000043607,0.000136024,0.00026332555,0.00006328305,0.0000053941367,0.000012195159,0.4599332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919852,0.000089766436,0.00029421132,0.000069194626,0.00015197085,0.0000034716636,0.0000024160272,0.0000046292585,0.0073991227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989612,0.0000723786,0.00024029268,0.00014276053,0.0003852835,0.00019807051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913263,0.00017596384,0.00012478096,0.0001917563,0.000198134,0.00017673943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048758776,0.000077462275,0.00019966875,0.00002340726,0.00009354414,0.000010795393,0.0002140822,0.00007166097,0.00026312098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041962703,0.00007382761,0.000072681236,0.000102289494,0.0004799028,0.0002177911,0.000048600177,0.00007785146,0.000017234634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023074333,0.00037752307,0.27614173,0.00011249244,0.000035518908,0.0002393709,0.124219716,0.000020182133,0.00007688304,0.5755986,0.018555751,0.0043914733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013399587,0.00014526588,0.0038833928,0.0000382452,0.00002723514,0.0000066991674,0.0013136494,3.8414316e-7,0.0002506725,0.0030036084,0.99109155,0.00010529123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68682265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69761485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001694329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009486318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31526282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763731455","doi":"","title":"The ... annotated Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01357245597307617,"score_gpt":0.23841083858503903,"score_spread":0.22483838261196287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763731455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16884914,0.00048780613,0.0000014767002,0.012559958,0.00039407998,0.00029530903,0.00014250516,0.000013642706,0.8172561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780958,0.0006147989,0.000031102038,0.00014469451,0.00014414424,0.000008903759,0.0000014139599,0.000008295358,0.020950831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876505,0.00008398144,0.00024020034,0.00016551642,0.00023000407,0.00051522645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849427,0.00024610848,0.000084483334,0.00022440444,0.00013281999,0.000817932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004323254,0.00010140971,0.00016214752,0.00021926634,0.00055311725,0.000027526321,0.00031424072,0.00009171099,0.00016568873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001615709,0.00006373837,0.000044080283,0.00018160777,0.0008356089,0.00015815215,0.00001237092,0.0000578147,0.000017072363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027703943,0.000010430921,0.016662015,0.000024230865,0.000052744283,0.00005598376,0.010401913,2.0655997e-7,0.0001509924,0.80720156,0.11838664,0.047025602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105490384,0.000028810717,0.013502655,0.000052617106,0.000014410473,0.0000014330035,0.0002682465,4.5931762e-7,0.000036931124,0.006217892,0.9796624,0.000108634085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99626464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8612758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013382494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012811718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42541865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763859269","doi":"","title":"Canadian constitutional law handbook: leading statements, principles and precedents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.047140691831844085,"score_gpt":0.31503301295929304,"score_spread":0.26789232112744893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763859269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032405052,0.00045030212,0.00002428817,0.0039656325,0.00037969902,0.00033279732,0.0002265233,0.000023589342,0.9621921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95646065,0.0013236412,0.00022144297,0.00041931184,0.00015680537,0.000018520428,0.00000715075,0.000010197879,0.04138229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843943,0.00007237396,0.00027314524,0.00025877112,0.00031827978,0.0006379908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982677,0.00012881013,0.00008005922,0.00015411757,0.00010372595,0.0012655868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042168208,0.00013363894,0.00018379561,0.00029334085,0.0006995466,0.00006357867,0.0002492614,0.00010146926,0.00042792276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018275344,0.00011734474,0.000039588846,0.000117985124,0.0011700076,0.00047202565,0.000024993959,0.00006610951,0.00005490522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052228916,0.000004087653,0.025708929,0.000015177251,0.000016245498,0.000023183664,0.0010153413,6.8053265e-7,0.00003180558,0.9642314,0.004993271,0.003954655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017278612,0.000020124442,0.0035522599,0.00019853168,0.000018438688,0.0000031969037,0.0002345935,4.2639425e-7,0.000048130198,0.002646822,0.99292696,0.00017774536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98890924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99975634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006433338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030762705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5457172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764285637","doi":"","title":"All about law : exploring the Canadian legal system","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05427303569610364,"score_gpt":0.26497195718237526,"score_spread":0.21069892148627162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764285637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02394597,0.00017994514,0.0000018152903,0.01549974,0.0010013052,0.00029471907,0.000072739116,0.00004662333,0.95895714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789075,0.00028177706,0.000040293795,0.000930737,0.0006180131,0.000060598377,0.0000018686942,0.000021197518,0.01913799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979107,0.0001543761,0.00030413986,0.00026337832,0.00044713888,0.0009203123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978683,0.00021304966,0.0000843511,0.00039127757,0.00012834105,0.0013146631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079396006,0.00016039793,0.00021199326,0.0002473202,0.001113866,0.00011914,0.00069453317,0.00010596298,0.00016185401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015544893,0.00011050965,0.00010032385,0.00022667462,0.0005227796,0.00048211816,0.000023526978,0.0001276268,0.00013870528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034673915,0.0000018150942,0.0010421794,0.00001691697,0.000013845412,0.000060136776,0.0024995306,6.2596206e-7,0.0000054289426,0.97875106,0.011849388,0.005755574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007780165,0.000014362905,0.003930205,0.00015180903,0.000027358838,0.000004859696,0.0013494918,4.4418525e-7,0.000017617847,0.0004137362,0.9938314,0.0001808879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99952525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98198205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011100209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030386737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765488684","doi":"","title":"The 1999 annotated Canadian charter of rights and freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013591256133573561,"score_gpt":0.23786283903416694,"score_spread":0.22427158290059337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765488684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17719719,0.00075154606,0.0000015536734,0.013049399,0.00046036212,0.0003468551,0.00018354265,0.000016250957,0.8079933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98009574,0.0007384981,0.000032071533,0.0001563647,0.00015807086,0.000009735081,0.0000018107982,0.000009055589,0.018798651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870247,0.00008748111,0.0002520782,0.00017576262,0.00024204285,0.00054017274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844474,0.00025195742,0.00008933838,0.00023525089,0.00012646681,0.00085222675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044203276,0.000108132364,0.00017141277,0.00022724917,0.0005761976,0.000029426184,0.00032981913,0.00009645898,0.00016233663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016007044,0.00006845825,0.000047013214,0.0001897294,0.00085881056,0.00016415867,0.000013285382,0.00006211614,0.000018300649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033343797,0.000012650622,0.01882731,0.000029286297,0.00006286563,0.000068719004,0.011898554,2.5539973e-7,0.0001688518,0.7599266,0.15676087,0.052210692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011165026,0.000030566716,0.01324542,0.000055780292,0.000015544305,0.0000015477433,0.00025777522,5.280379e-7,0.000036865993,0.005591301,0.9805377,0.00011529102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82377684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014084781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012984878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44317043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765582690","doi":"","title":"All about law : exploring the Canadian legal system","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05427303569610364,"score_gpt":0.26497195718237526,"score_spread":0.21069892148627162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765582690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02394597,0.00017994514,0.0000018152903,0.01549974,0.0010013052,0.00029471907,0.000072739116,0.00004662333,0.95895714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789075,0.00028177706,0.000040293795,0.000930737,0.0006180131,0.000060598377,0.0000018686942,0.000021197518,0.01913799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979107,0.0001543761,0.00030413986,0.00026337832,0.00044713888,0.0009203123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978683,0.00021304966,0.0000843511,0.00039127757,0.00012834105,0.0013146631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079396006,0.00016039793,0.00021199326,0.0002473202,0.001113866,0.00011914,0.00069453317,0.00010596298,0.00016185401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015544893,0.00011050965,0.00010032385,0.00022667462,0.0005227796,0.00048211816,0.000023526978,0.0001276268,0.00013870528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034673915,0.0000018150942,0.0010421794,0.00001691697,0.000013845412,0.000060136776,0.0024995306,6.2596206e-7,0.0000054289426,0.97875106,0.011849388,0.005755574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007780165,0.000014362905,0.003930205,0.00015180903,0.000027358838,0.000004859696,0.0013494918,4.4418525e-7,0.000017617847,0.0004137362,0.9938314,0.0001808879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99952525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98198205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011100209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030386737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8567069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765742902","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1332","title":"Henry v British Columbia: Still Seeking a Just Approach to Damages for Wrongful Conviction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Conviction; Political science; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Charter; Wrongful death","score_opus":0.06746170237539233,"score_gpt":0.3345962879397789,"score_spread":0.2671345855643866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765742902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0349373,0.27910557,0.06778128,0.13385987,0.005878525,0.02526253,0.0008767752,0.0018397127,0.45045844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031384,0.062190395,0.0035224108,0.007624631,0.0012035816,0.0008250967,0.000025765266,0.000063648215,0.021406094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981355,0.00019464876,0.00034440114,0.00043729282,0.00041110368,0.00047704918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987542,0.00023253291,0.00010613368,0.000287881,0.0003851035,0.00023414708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016244025,0.000117648444,0.0003871253,0.0000126299365,0.00058357307,0.00031075682,0.0003827776,0.0000883552,0.00040824205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073815434,0.00013071146,0.00014903105,0.00023825845,0.00023789959,0.00044854285,0.0000693328,0.00007540092,0.00009847373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026386588,0.000243738,0.002157907,0.007144843,0.00007487657,0.000013747668,0.0015040598,0.0000010861731,0.0003746563,0.094402604,0.73841614,0.15563999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015519669,0.000048726444,0.00038184514,0.0050557293,0.00011550558,0.000009119792,0.00021476211,0.0000030170731,0.0000038705653,0.00048233542,0.99330676,0.00022314911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036836356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13735671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8682011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015184756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013130496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96957743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765911270","doi":"","title":"Crankshaw's Criminal code of Canada; a commentary on the Criminal law of Canada including an appendix containing all relevant [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05093558450218146,"score_gpt":0.285345178579715,"score_spread":0.2344095940775335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765911270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52771395,0.00016000324,0.0000066785265,0.06200101,0.00062806526,0.0005859356,0.001021166,0.000016426493,0.40786678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898694,0.000117083946,0.00008790614,0.008434647,0.00014913508,0.000014318172,0.000011778146,0.00002258308,0.0012931603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969389,0.00030094595,0.0006304969,0.00031608753,0.0009879172,0.00082568807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971829,0.0010659139,0.00035197832,0.00044014378,0.00021378988,0.0007452891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010950881,0.00022913906,0.0004350249,0.0001432995,0.0006064959,0.000017954153,0.0008264413,0.00008227778,0.00036058822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040462016,0.00017098096,0.000077540695,0.00015617392,0.0006016676,0.00020004838,0.000060978055,0.00018392772,0.0000011254407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033797024,0.00005090744,0.0030552878,0.0001424831,0.000097374366,0.00018994072,0.011864949,0.000017762064,0.00035094336,0.6834684,0.2968674,0.003556576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027003716,0.00023634433,0.0019138709,0.00039082032,0.00010989212,0.000004682626,0.010192286,0.0000064102824,0.00065961597,0.00084651035,0.9850837,0.00028582598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99993753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6882163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010652711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008695133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99692464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766005526","doi":"","title":"Digest Canadian case law : 1900-1911","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02665911487579928,"score_gpt":0.2655692158513737,"score_spread":0.23891010097557444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766005526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04467477,0.00018888236,0.00000154884,0.011054557,0.0005356671,0.00027394848,0.00023986184,0.00003766984,0.9429931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96259665,0.00038192802,0.00008620581,0.001072376,0.00043311412,0.000019705692,0.0000041975773,0.00002440735,0.03538143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978855,0.000116589996,0.00031645427,0.0003268797,0.00033157514,0.0010229503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967809,0.00023326417,0.00008478437,0.00038338028,0.00014368918,0.0023739848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005002881,0.00018476925,0.00024887902,0.00042360538,0.00083228905,0.000059204478,0.000436928,0.00018465919,0.0010186945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002812087,0.00015988202,0.00010164633,0.00030997684,0.0006166293,0.000367229,0.000021262857,0.00011153018,0.00019166133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007312987,0.000010190123,0.0076043503,0.000018270379,0.000018643992,0.0028394484,0.0038135601,4.4334604e-7,0.000018258945,0.9248879,0.041059785,0.019721815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012314797,0.000030712887,0.0016554209,0.00006696141,0.000025661257,0.00006884282,0.00064634415,1.5052422e-7,0.000020879632,0.0017809791,0.99531907,0.00026184472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99962026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067861605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004027761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766119890","doi":"10.71781/1844","title":"État de droit et lutte antiterroriste : étude parallèle des systèmes juridiques français et canadien quant à la collecte et au partage des renseignements","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.07824659693397171,"score_gpt":0.3888743734554714,"score_spread":0.31062777652149964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766119890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83178246,0.0010812709,0.00005818605,0.0008736128,0.0004569965,0.00084138394,0.00023369632,0.000007833831,0.16466458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403426,0.0024586841,0.003139451,0.00013861117,0.00009315915,0.00013424159,0.00030403578,0.00005440751,0.053334817],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542886,0.0013216771,0.0006580278,0.00086845964,0.0006233355,0.0010996661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974272,0.00051870657,0.0007007042,0.0005479679,0.00030377883,0.0005016402],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00356068,0.0005480276,0.00081460713,0.00012008969,0.0029241282,0.0019141433,0.0017314756,0.00046964432,0.00096014893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007355525,0.00058935635,0.00022381126,0.00026662124,0.0010343513,0.0015267414,0.00018319051,0.00046967366,0.00022117344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040910186,0.00033120037,0.038501732,0.0007239587,0.00036761537,0.00074093975,0.9065985,0.000064968524,0.0008128988,0.01371739,0.0021608484,0.035570834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014937812,0.0010491251,0.49576893,0.014045177,0.0014550381,0.00008715627,0.10949776,0.00023281484,0.005516751,0.012827021,0.3551179,0.0029085558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7071213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7971007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009856571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041153673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766247746","doi":"","title":"Ipeelee et le devoir de résistance (Ipeelee and the Duty to Resist)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.01270681140432618,"score_gpt":0.2912106568454974,"score_spread":0.27850384544117124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766247746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18343087,0.069078036,0.012240847,0.7250343,0.00070288713,0.00024940487,0.000008233502,0.000029582969,0.00922585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913837,0.047893036,0.00018852223,0.0016403248,0.00083411986,0.000008997225,1.4428805e-7,0.000020226344,0.058030926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948695,0.000914186,0.00035391797,0.00031166393,0.00053254375,0.0030182474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840987,0.00070012285,0.00019566501,0.00023236775,0.00015509478,0.00030685985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008147227,0.00021317252,0.00029349647,0.000050143546,0.0012915673,0.0002085426,0.000653312,0.00013347309,0.0000761725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000860083,0.00013154192,0.00016720427,0.00029393335,0.0010257438,0.00055335456,0.00009208617,0.0011656039,0.00010986426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029681282,0.000034695146,0.000543132,0.00000846348,0.000066041976,0.000008067552,0.0021769544,0.0000032046037,0.00024282496,0.93481284,0.004233198,0.057573784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012290432,0.00022738124,0.002003849,0.00023729811,0.00009964002,0.00036857408,0.0062015997,0.000006830247,0.00007868843,0.6606263,0.32866558,0.00025519799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036976223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069783404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015051658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054635433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766297629","doi":"10.1017/9781108333436.016","title":"The European Court of Human Rights and the Canadian Case Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.04210361219989183,"score_gpt":0.25287147148181116,"score_spread":0.21076785928191932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766297629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023066656,0.00015344951,7.4686966e-7,0.00032265525,0.00013319975,0.00028194988,0.00007311393,0.000015504813,0.9987887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2827039,0.000031059964,0.0000013670365,0.000023334462,0.000117683536,1.2329579e-7,0.0000018333009,0.00000797694,0.7171127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899894,0.00023435976,0.00010918258,0.00020358768,0.00022507888,0.00022884112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987309,0.00018779635,0.00021198724,0.00049411407,0.00015887007,0.00021632393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008969574,0.00014534111,0.0001952108,0.00003184178,0.008922413,0.00019950239,0.0007642045,0.0001206673,0.0000022230315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001592011,0.00010318605,0.00010548657,0.0000019109568,0.005313876,0.00007316158,0.0001872657,0.0002814257,0.0000039381016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017229771,7.236546e-7,4.294049e-7,0.000009457452,0.000033990535,0.0013963375,0.00095577055,3.0380097e-8,3.4643386e-7,0.982789,0.014526538,0.00027014976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022681897,0.000011298878,0.000006672798,0.000076442855,0.00016284677,0.000038070393,0.00020308205,7.9679e-7,0.000003986169,0.00041830714,0.9987196,0.00013210693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.893746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9106929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012311936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016783604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766345990","doi":"","title":"Canada statute annotations : R.S.C. 1970 edition : being a compilation of case annotations to the Revised statutes covering [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02131715114395199,"score_gpt":0.264937140476401,"score_spread":0.243619989332449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766345990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4882521,0.00032419234,0.0021439989,0.0784986,0.0019664008,0.002500052,0.006940237,0.00007863552,0.41929576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593085,0.00017480306,0.00055010343,0.00046834856,0.00022751428,0.00003591618,0.000027439994,0.0000117234895,0.0025733176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985391,0.00013029485,0.000381465,0.0001835485,0.0003971318,0.00036846948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830633,0.00057690917,0.00017020368,0.00022511624,0.000335505,0.00038593388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004211664,0.000110088644,0.00017263985,0.00023277513,0.00062856305,0.00003153936,0.00020679961,0.00004441355,0.00010242866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006532794,0.000088187444,0.000046751822,0.00048990874,0.00015429962,0.00032760383,0.000018390916,0.00006646634,0.000004645169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062599735,0.000041777625,0.012529956,0.0001695835,0.000100744895,0.00039289254,0.037144516,0.0008188097,0.0005431006,0.5042535,0.37632605,0.06761649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012019443,0.000031323703,0.012297577,0.00015553585,0.00004264198,0.0000075878393,0.0018787825,0.000010201605,0.000055995846,0.0007694184,0.9844821,0.000148626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6081561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040565943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040785377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72351503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766395255","doi":"","title":"Digest of reported cases touching the criminal law of Canada : with references to the statutes and an index.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Index (typography); Statute; Criminal law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03597540531136806,"score_gpt":0.2769291324209339,"score_spread":0.24095372710956586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766395255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8066575,0.00013046121,0.000002208169,0.005160554,0.00008559066,0.00023089486,0.00009497682,0.0000050448743,0.18763278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99783593,0.00013842179,0.000045958823,0.00024133906,0.000077224955,0.000009158399,0.0000011052578,0.000006812528,0.0016440228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865913,0.00012004919,0.00029244408,0.00017758903,0.00043161729,0.0003191394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984746,0.0005146167,0.00019446708,0.0002964698,0.00017976426,0.0003401087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005155123,0.000104298735,0.00019345732,0.00007240199,0.0003911501,0.000023500717,0.00034942856,0.00003866485,0.000040066403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036724255,0.000052107473,0.000020336878,0.0001752687,0.00061227486,0.00018022273,0.00002514544,0.00006585723,1.5093809e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024948717,0.00003861558,0.14067623,0.00013215361,0.00010961137,0.00022708526,0.04583302,0.000022916043,0.00021514144,0.7698303,0.010957223,0.031708233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016030215,0.0003675303,0.12654331,0.00035315697,0.00011727867,0.000024836481,0.021323793,7.52463e-7,0.00038693432,0.0011302144,0.8493247,0.00026721263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99909616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83836746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007869142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031514585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5590552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766780520","doi":"","title":"Foundations of criminal and civil law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminology; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025065075741016758,"score_gpt":0.25852150653741407,"score_spread":0.2334564307963973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766780520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27607548,0.00013373011,0.000002545823,0.00324619,0.00015247255,0.00012271148,0.00005899092,0.000003838368,0.72020406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962441,0.00039949632,0.000076355755,0.00017733274,0.000050873758,0.000006112689,0.0000010717633,0.000005308362,0.003039354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990695,0.00005491008,0.0002285115,0.00013233475,0.00022395195,0.00029078458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921614,0.0002175265,0.000066525674,0.00012305508,0.0000674138,0.0003093139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022676271,0.00006918075,0.00015313561,0.00014288505,0.00012023111,0.000008597754,0.00016276231,0.000040249706,0.00023581229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001638917,0.00006098375,0.000020885791,0.00014426703,0.00031032102,0.00015913717,0.0000143383595,0.00004190587,0.0000020098487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000951251,0.0000078653475,0.04807484,0.000043787968,0.0000070675283,0.00002621007,0.0030647113,7.5820157e-7,0.000048394595,0.9276044,0.005730758,0.015381708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014064288,0.000020155276,0.049600396,0.00010914293,0.000017754677,0.0000013265848,0.0015255585,5.3610313e-7,0.00003531465,0.0034372266,0.9449878,0.00012414828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.939257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037508024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004719377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83719724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767390495","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment : index to Canadian legal literature, 1985-1986","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.015509346898178043,"score_gpt":0.25934072108219713,"score_spread":0.2438313741840191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767390495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010702532,0.00053965196,0.0000027589233,0.104360625,0.0012288069,0.00067455973,0.00040690912,0.000028625354,0.8820555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9079709,0.0006349113,0.0000537138,0.0039397352,0.0006322455,0.00005952747,0.000008245592,0.00003075684,0.086669944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668217,0.00015494262,0.0004001239,0.0004179154,0.00061280845,0.0017320333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934617,0.00022581537,0.00008474665,0.00055304536,0.00032935812,0.005345311],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009603653,0.00025521766,0.00025643336,0.00092754856,0.0021455227,0.00036094966,0.0010209916,0.00023980835,0.00031248847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065658323,0.00018750805,0.000120436394,0.00075951824,0.00040556764,0.00035320764,0.00003066719,0.00022290304,0.00019864475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001889243,0.000005959699,0.009990296,0.00001263499,0.00003398298,0.00026814567,0.0048604524,0.0000028360205,0.000009162521,0.5665362,0.36675757,0.05150385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010498393,0.000038936632,0.01697797,0.0001398835,0.0000151004715,0.000005254191,0.00034550374,5.4976493e-7,0.000011575294,0.0011725548,0.98088837,0.00029934623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99994123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8972684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029648915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017844504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767505135","doi":"","title":"Les écueils du contentieux antidiscriminatoire au prisme de la jurisprudence canadienne","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.024869839325445262,"score_gpt":0.27117490918214304,"score_spread":0.24630506985669778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767505135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5640443,0.0028906583,0.035831254,0.12589462,0.0011701545,0.00064994226,0.00013758808,0.00023971777,0.2691418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305221,0.0041654366,0.0053246077,0.00013312645,0.00018414596,0.0000874131,0.000059345308,0.000065621156,0.059458222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807489,0.014910701,0.0008659539,0.0012867713,0.00076493854,0.001422759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881045,0.00559453,0.000859243,0.0019659668,0.002587061,0.0008886968],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016732188,0.0006300533,0.00070307055,0.0001755844,0.0023113478,0.0007019987,0.0029806814,0.00079838315,0.0006648734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005562238,0.0006271993,0.00046544662,0.00052504573,0.0035961943,0.0005194296,0.001416403,0.0009793787,0.00016703145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018877501,0.00039789206,0.018358935,0.00022102361,0.000073458505,0.000048672817,0.06725189,0.0000052377236,0.0013848287,0.8147311,0.0023996765,0.09510838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093806104,0.00000267925,0.082806595,0.013168126,0.00037049648,0.00009941096,0.0072587053,0.0012701792,0.014134205,0.056558263,0.82161033,0.0017829638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.395281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31154937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81921065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016245447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021030374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767710311","doi":"","title":"Statutes of British Columbia judicially considered : 1960-1977","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Statute of limitations; Political science; Self-incrimination","score_opus":0.0208517243171804,"score_gpt":0.24862432686304597,"score_spread":0.22777260254586557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767710311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2641147,0.00039033787,0.000005118097,0.0025148694,0.00040944392,0.00031723242,0.00055020413,0.000033267395,0.73166484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94158465,0.0015579382,0.00034211896,0.0002811783,0.00020302006,0.000012310353,0.0000034949408,0.000017498245,0.055997793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982532,0.00011309323,0.0004202942,0.00024948447,0.00041928142,0.000544649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839854,0.00036426666,0.00018045936,0.00023537318,0.00024763847,0.0005736948],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046869,0.000090753885,0.00031840007,0.00013324784,0.00022833618,0.000060115082,0.00034769787,0.00012783014,0.0012921089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006629672,0.00012281202,0.00009723603,0.00023757026,0.0008035985,0.00023676305,0.000027273345,0.00006756707,0.000021109548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002270818,0.0000508656,0.08784589,0.00009101704,0.00006481005,0.00019651126,0.0039005359,4.3256628e-7,0.00033398138,0.05577197,0.72749865,0.12422262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002160117,0.000055806024,0.043471184,0.0002228164,0.000031755546,0.000003745766,0.0005492789,9.612583e-8,0.000021813607,0.0078544365,0.9473851,0.00018797646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67746997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014005044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029220816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768383290","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Criminal Law Through Civil Processes: How Does Human Rights Law Treat ‘Civil for Criminal Processes’?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Political science; Criminal Conviction; Criminal procedure; Human rights; Procedural law; Conviction; Public law","score_opus":0.04063194723556551,"score_gpt":0.3483867546552124,"score_spread":0.3077548074196469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768383290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46409592,0.009173065,0.016324569,0.032540306,0.0026480856,0.00316492,0.00007344334,0.0006273059,0.4713524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866031,0.0010875328,0.00021728734,0.0002287175,0.0026336124,0.00007310238,0.000007603631,0.00004877342,0.009100293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938597,0.00013783165,0.00047116663,0.00063086196,0.0009677378,0.00393268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972471,0.00028648265,0.0007317577,0.0005002195,0.0009501995,0.00028421966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002490776,0.00044738932,0.00052032265,0.00007039761,0.016094696,0.0021271624,0.0018042176,0.00024538225,0.000088769266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060383626,0.00033111635,0.0002661143,0.00015213167,0.0012757679,0.003804612,0.00010638969,0.0013379249,0.00001584933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000161325,0.00012700714,0.00011685882,0.0005397374,0.00008002173,0.000019728208,0.012522489,0.0000023145055,0.00015200269,0.9851599,0.00042188205,0.0006967877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010523922,0.00082891167,0.00002513924,0.00046931708,0.0006117308,0.00019185485,0.023951216,0.0000040884397,0.0028547724,0.8029945,0.16633345,0.0006826495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0264365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8103888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010766962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004064716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769121512","doi":"","title":"Revised statutes of Alberta, 2000 : prepared and published in accordance with the Statute Revision Act.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Statute of limitations; Political science","score_opus":0.011446269487247435,"score_gpt":0.24621287362600933,"score_spread":0.23476660413876188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769121512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5799492,0.0010744726,0.000006719544,0.017561167,0.00010411265,0.00078200124,0.00005518193,0.000013549122,0.40045363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778491,0.0031251463,0.00020801532,0.00020100985,0.00006276243,0.000017461365,0.0000025038175,0.000013140363,0.01852081],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985256,0.00015406108,0.00031725317,0.00026270884,0.00032669547,0.0004136576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846065,0.00059142936,0.00019509566,0.0003262472,0.00013232364,0.00029425646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007188833,0.0001271784,0.00027178164,0.0001928415,0.00014460486,0.000047876856,0.0003575335,0.00006786809,0.00022771931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062683184,0.00007516075,0.000035080335,0.00036478427,0.0004764097,0.0005935372,0.000028995133,0.000082485225,0.0000028222225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008083509,0.000093024515,0.24595396,0.00050096895,0.00009393628,0.000077085155,0.0846847,0.000007049762,0.0003377797,0.2022315,0.16094178,0.30426988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002866881,0.00007189687,0.033343557,0.0004246677,0.000019881882,9.746993e-7,0.00082707213,6.854734e-7,0.000034424836,0.00050789485,0.96433914,0.0001431123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78327715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98253787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80339736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013529218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001802836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31981537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769775469","doi":"","title":"Public and private acts of British Columbia.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.0331771188164451,"score_gpt":0.24134564405365969,"score_spread":0.20816852523721457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769775469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.431366,0.00023657703,0.0000022034683,0.002710311,0.00014398854,0.00016546737,0.000106977895,0.000015252211,0.5652532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617884,0.0019063434,0.00013596154,0.00011391907,0.00009879495,0.0000066977054,0.0000011255303,0.000009110073,0.035939652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.00006507801,0.00022156887,0.00017658337,0.00025119242,0.00038419737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893206,0.00013994827,0.00009816758,0.00015560613,0.000113943584,0.00056024827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003800497,0.000056553825,0.00018138422,0.00010064815,0.00015883031,0.00006793029,0.00023944025,0.00008693886,0.00035089793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045645193,0.000073163035,0.00003959001,0.0001759063,0.00050468894,0.00029862396,0.000028234233,0.00004287725,0.00000647172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010199258,0.000041751293,0.3027872,0.00013761496,0.000045211895,0.00009082885,0.0024967685,5.183914e-8,0.00029578406,0.31142703,0.11800693,0.26466063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011376895,0.000027428476,0.08005353,0.00009996675,0.000010192618,0.0000028855427,0.00013462387,5.9525153e-8,0.000007306397,0.0029218595,0.9165273,0.00010111096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95620614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7985203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007488479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078077475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38420862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770722283","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3069932","title":"R. v. Marakah: The Complexities of Standing in the Context of Sent Text Messages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Computer science; Linguistics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06046030337314867,"score_gpt":0.3580102117230839,"score_spread":0.2975499083499352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770722283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347705,0.004881674,0.00013943588,0.033039708,0.00019369916,0.00019668388,0.0000050185213,0.000004623454,0.026768656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955241,0.0035134235,0.0000044265057,0.00005554923,0.00014004661,0.0000017325744,1.2780112e-7,0.0000034011082,0.00075720577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982284,0.00029476508,0.00022612151,0.000066783505,0.0004310025,0.0007529569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990453,0.00032170038,0.00033551842,0.00020274291,0.00007439634,0.000020358199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055784085,0.00006285352,0.00014791798,0.000030320416,0.0010815912,0.000109719935,0.0009263443,0.000030102005,0.000037475234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003013256,0.000034763067,0.00008332302,0.000054910306,0.0007356224,0.00020065121,0.00004049258,0.0005951857,0.0000015121991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035052457,0.000020783638,0.00517067,0.0000061990786,0.000022872307,0.00000146025,0.018570647,0.0000019438467,0.0000905979,0.96872765,0.00022784316,0.0071243034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035019603,0.0001794295,0.016887017,0.00013443774,0.000039853665,0.00004007255,0.5865009,0.000010534021,0.0001986479,0.38215923,0.013400907,0.00009878878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00893434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08299608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58656836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021345435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086767465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771226430","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Alberta : consolidated to ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0220611669621233,"score_gpt":0.2753203096689318,"score_spread":0.2532591427068085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771226430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16567594,0.000064435146,0.000006761321,0.007768148,0.00021176308,0.00022846549,0.000084761916,0.000012697416,0.82594705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94237125,0.00029963962,0.00024255535,0.00031562842,0.00009626159,0.000009904978,0.000002126647,0.000010921493,0.05665173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880666,0.000067934736,0.000268929,0.00017806451,0.0002569015,0.00042154355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851245,0.00036948253,0.000084359934,0.00022810147,0.00014885618,0.0006567717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026695002,0.00009476249,0.00020865389,0.00027492736,0.00011720904,0.000011710191,0.00033026966,0.000074573894,0.00080456666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006358315,0.00007721664,0.000054099146,0.00027852043,0.00028672963,0.00015148468,0.00002323667,0.000036932837,0.000075626005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006146466,0.000032905973,0.024698706,0.00005263592,0.00004455016,0.000026448111,0.018558228,0.0000012567408,0.0010583987,0.7378041,0.17296876,0.044692554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009454354,0.000046653226,0.0051250537,0.00009000765,0.000015206649,5.066209e-7,0.00048776565,8.0040664e-8,0.00039674374,0.0011442353,0.99247515,0.00012408002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9405904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81950635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009929572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013601176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8809441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771266232","doi":"","title":"The Socioeconomic implications of Ontario's Joint and Several Liability Arrangement: Insights from Municipal Political Elites in Perth County","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Socioeconomic status; Liability; Political science; Joint (building); Geography; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Population; Engineering; Civil engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.13359524494519337,"score_gpt":0.35393179057192503,"score_spread":0.22033654562673166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771266232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928189,0.000082029495,0.0000073795854,0.0042346194,0.00011718513,0.00022477833,0.00003690654,0.000018523728,0.0024596788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998166,0.000077407785,0.000015188621,0.00012869244,0.000059075956,0.0000015975578,0.0000050450626,0.0000070181954,0.0015399738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856114,0.00026058676,0.00023971511,0.0003505139,0.00020063028,0.00038743194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985665,0.00030090773,0.00019359298,0.00063038064,0.00010212397,0.00020650512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051723723,0.00014169524,0.00023496305,0.000070958245,0.0015399171,0.00042722555,0.00086698955,0.00012892966,0.00003430605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012991902,0.00013286107,0.00008360459,0.000043950145,0.0011081717,0.0013751116,0.00035327443,0.00033693376,0.000014737841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042879823,0.000043127664,0.97306377,0.000008143233,0.000017942988,0.000005925244,0.008521912,0.0000011408673,0.00006484029,0.018037658,3.3249006e-7,0.00019233642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034448897,0.000028066304,0.9787048,0.000056925175,0.000036815283,6.0147823e-7,0.0029771398,3.5362865e-7,0.000055786943,0.007073347,0.0105751585,0.00014652504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05392126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8946251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8407039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008357392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042399313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773902196","doi":"","title":"Ontario. Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Business; Workplace safety; Actuarial science; Occupational safety and health; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020903846980782893,"score_gpt":0.2672110351912151,"score_spread":0.24630718821043218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773902196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32550853,0.0013455682,0.0000039770343,0.009080686,0.00067957316,0.00029570746,0.000125459,0.000023309716,0.66293716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97368395,0.015216693,0.00023635746,0.00013798583,0.00020103068,0.000007981731,0.00000482585,0.000009248405,0.010501909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985711,0.00007018514,0.00026805597,0.0002693711,0.00029954888,0.0005217629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985758,0.000104903884,0.0001971121,0.00040951814,0.00010492245,0.00060776214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006034869,0.00014819033,0.00027033873,0.00054405275,0.0017572729,0.00016160228,0.0005744191,0.0001479531,0.00020791934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027889205,0.00015288651,0.000104426654,0.00046708513,0.0015470448,0.00044219728,0.000045571538,0.00014635222,0.000011046364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007293882,0.0000140194325,0.91394174,0.000026533695,0.000029356948,0.00002376412,0.0054283715,4.3189502e-7,0.0000044175304,0.05160428,0.015049079,0.013805064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109413006,0.000019948082,0.40453807,0.00004440283,0.000012446037,9.793631e-7,0.00042732686,9.714894e-8,0.0000021214328,0.00056006986,0.59416825,0.00011688567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65243524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086416934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007158348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774724821","doi":"","title":"Ontario's Bill 175 on Policing: Improved Accountability but Lagging Governance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Community policing; Criminal justice; Lagging; Public administration; Unit (ring theory); Law; Police science; Criminology; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.030783874355245724,"score_gpt":0.3297382951063991,"score_spread":0.2989544207511534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774724821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93828523,0.00026055062,0.00013916081,0.017659111,0.000723082,0.00016185985,0.0000026708433,0.000036304365,0.04273202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981901,0.0012741516,0.000029074094,0.00024641585,0.0008723511,0.00000334743,2.928383e-7,0.000012122523,0.015661282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654186,0.00009677599,0.00024053814,0.0002757888,0.00050872663,0.0023362932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878424,0.00009466891,0.00039962784,0.00044113642,0.00012028174,0.00016006712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003295453,0.00015743457,0.00020258433,0.00002806017,0.0031620446,0.0005031288,0.0009955161,0.0001022211,0.00016036698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063865574,0.0001223378,0.00014767691,0.00004920725,0.0002707339,0.00079893635,0.00007452562,0.0017519786,0.00006143461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041705824,0.00023454917,0.08817708,0.000013351895,0.0001260272,0.000016101256,0.011929337,0.000011472795,0.0018397949,0.78300315,0.0008761775,0.11335591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013825692,0.0008767628,0.18355207,0.00023901951,0.000115934614,0.00013382631,0.013632248,0.00003609296,0.0006392344,0.35765582,0.44080245,0.00093395787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6870272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94284356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43992627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004755651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005083959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775070820","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Public Law : Readings on the Law, State, and Citizen","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Constitutional law; State (computer science); Municipal law; Charter; Common law; Private law; Constitution; Administrative law","score_opus":0.05899538876255789,"score_gpt":0.3075914701599615,"score_spread":0.24859608139740363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775070820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000107414584,0.000044905773,0.0000075391436,0.14715227,0.00034657013,0.00025879178,0.0000066306075,0.00004904568,0.8520268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00827495,0.00007052241,0.0000350239,0.004376085,0.0022369926,0.0000141516375,0.000007430997,0.000013437035,0.9849714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868536,0.000093093215,0.00013604,0.00032372377,0.00050130195,0.00026050358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990907,0.00020095176,0.00006014217,0.00022079727,0.00021671035,0.00021071038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013782514,0.00013284087,0.0001614162,0.000038939812,0.00053777423,0.0003894709,0.00027057627,0.0001239128,0.0009861578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026612612,0.000089765,0.000032795364,0.00007773101,0.000505816,0.00021348106,0.0000800798,0.00020539657,0.0006654934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047529575,0.000002297022,3.2200558e-7,0.0000032782687,0.0000033021508,6.0736045e-7,0.0014430811,5.6802328e-8,0.0000010930996,0.5207452,0.47723585,0.00056012324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021628008,0.000060881644,0.0000013280634,0.000025922976,0.000010092649,9.755959e-7,0.00092708564,1.6474722e-7,0.0000074954205,0.107042104,0.8917859,0.00011643048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073064715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035959937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41455004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002631202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026033993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776141614","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746420","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Bradshaw</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Reliability (semiconductor); Test (biology); Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.268432360058455,"score_gpt":0.458226880767542,"score_spread":0.18979452070908698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776141614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17476235,0.0036393953,0.0011823656,0.76400095,0.008059603,0.00031463456,0.000004308083,0.000026213324,0.048010204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930639,0.0010535523,0.00024393028,0.0011521229,0.002090655,0.0000023434056,8.152361e-8,0.000005737471,0.002387648],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788165,0.00011910342,0.00034264807,0.00009889013,0.001372132,0.00018558285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737334,0.00050055893,0.0007932623,0.00030921862,0.0009230031,0.00010060049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032108014,0.000079071244,0.00013186761,0.000044565582,0.00088144495,0.00073087955,0.003961404,0.000040023697,0.00022688629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047781756,0.000045302277,0.00015213816,0.00003546655,0.0005701418,0.0018721087,0.00019523276,0.0002425607,0.000049239137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017103254,0.00039416362,0.05293356,0.000040500334,0.00054337806,0.0009307323,0.031837653,0.0001749079,0.010995557,0.22415446,0.31732753,0.35895723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003321978,0.00015706339,0.008550142,0.0012728358,0.00008196696,0.00018983104,0.0018323982,0.00002580233,0.0049634865,0.03052011,0.95187366,0.00020050019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010216614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008382899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81830156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115833594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041256283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777005456","doi":"10.5623/cig2017-303","title":"Geomatics And The Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Geomatics; Law; Political science; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.03791496737115112,"score_gpt":0.3539571924344309,"score_spread":0.3160422250632798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777005456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12940815,0.0001623133,0.000119599244,0.09734638,0.0002203264,0.00022150663,0.0000013127919,0.000041242885,0.7724792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973329,0.000067359775,0.0004346265,0.00043928876,0.000115776675,0.000006699388,1.156406e-7,0.0000024091999,0.0016008572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947286,0.000060737,0.00008121711,0.0000655187,0.00017212045,0.00014753712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992933,0.0002593518,0.00006311866,0.00030783587,0.00002407954,0.000052315823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008108399,0.000039192357,0.000082243205,0.000004103754,0.0025538385,0.0004105425,0.00033282494,0.000027019252,0.00009969645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006595896,0.00002422953,0.00002395367,0.000011146968,0.0017159878,0.00017724953,0.00008346614,0.00004328541,0.00009799123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004291896,0.0000033201811,0.00016019355,0.000008749978,0.0000032341625,0.0000013876459,0.0065916125,8.906177e-8,0.0000014771323,0.9901427,0.0010568794,0.0020260352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064066105,0.000016771126,0.009027546,0.00008550657,0.00007187804,0.000005350485,0.0073896535,0.00038125314,0.000026408725,0.5299477,0.45223802,0.00016926926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061594937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004583806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86792475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006503071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019495637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778785691","doi":"10.29173/alr1422","title":"Evidence Not in a Form Familiar to Common Law Courts: Assessing Oral Histories in Land Claims Testimony after Delgamuukw v. B.C.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Key (lock); Oral history; Political science; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09665511402190467,"score_gpt":0.3903933249545366,"score_spread":0.2937382109326319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778785691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5619431,0.16590118,0.000058381724,0.09599343,0.0010427062,0.0034702509,0.000007710729,0.00014011086,0.17144313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96080244,0.023818832,0.00035859237,0.013885907,0.000080396996,0.00016612156,0.0000024731223,0.000018755054,0.00086646894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975621,0.00033625474,0.0005966168,0.0004336281,0.00047114008,0.00060025835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979757,0.0012078277,0.00011358065,0.0003947916,0.00009441906,0.00021368593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015987268,0.00023143814,0.0006180041,0.00004853363,0.00025671924,0.00016366056,0.00045812284,0.00011324102,0.0001507975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075013,0.00020943463,0.00009765874,0.00061370153,0.00030405808,0.0014008252,0.00010660425,0.00024833795,0.00012679402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002690297,0.00039674315,0.43403685,0.003346682,0.000021533297,0.0006770305,0.013960934,0.000017744022,0.000035348326,0.45513356,0.006050428,0.08605411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001390297,0.0000618953,0.010561123,0.017592775,0.000054250213,0.000012119029,0.00014540087,0.000013450102,0.000006228515,0.0016283859,0.96940243,0.00038290772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44373766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9243944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054509856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016373974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8540496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779213843","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030651366788262895,"score_gpt":0.29370229857612146,"score_spread":0.26305093178785854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779213843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02678569,0.00004720815,0.0000020460977,0.06472828,0.0012391111,0.0002701214,0.000050849027,0.000019601463,0.9068571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547717,0.00013397561,0.00040897154,0.001907315,0.003076936,0.000020983713,0.000007610785,0.000019785666,0.03965272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983312,0.000059417496,0.00022589271,0.00031830752,0.0003240637,0.0007411164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711174,0.00003497335,0.00009877263,0.0006236852,0.00019369888,0.0019371556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055047526,0.00013665609,0.0002027341,0.00039018714,0.0020903528,0.00020498373,0.0007705322,0.0001251486,0.00077411724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006558514,0.00015788856,0.0000686239,0.00012374308,0.00042426668,0.00042681707,0.000030150875,0.00013515346,0.00018643493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001017641,0.000005876257,0.0011471724,0.000017716566,0.000009283629,0.000061865816,0.004113579,0.0000032362616,0.000016024938,0.79442334,0.1892838,0.010907901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005338774,0.000035486337,0.009632895,0.000024201745,0.000029422674,0.0000032385542,0.0007585224,4.966684e-7,0.0000329191,0.0013966402,0.9878409,0.00019190603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000569186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024752386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781044514","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Human rights; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01876450353820249,"score_gpt":0.2518688070905756,"score_spread":0.23310430355237308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781044514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024996528,0.00024151182,0.0000016678841,0.014639193,0.0005570387,0.0002427306,0.00009088879,0.000012148986,0.95921826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665382,0.0003538826,0.000039870898,0.00017802615,0.00027516187,0.000012635062,0.0000012671161,0.000009641316,0.032591347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844044,0.00009562623,0.0002858953,0.00017414983,0.0003626604,0.0006411973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821275,0.00027178568,0.00010552477,0.0003294221,0.00016705054,0.00091347797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057814474,0.00011123782,0.00017662645,0.00024679623,0.00088432827,0.000033953973,0.0005652094,0.00011781878,0.00039799695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020789781,0.000069366244,0.00008594833,0.00020671998,0.000881297,0.00016745772,0.000013263232,0.00007389332,0.00006748879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008288527,0.0000051050647,0.0047542914,0.0000073558745,0.000020147712,0.000019850331,0.0029551128,1.3680102e-7,0.000029719191,0.9118618,0.063943096,0.01639512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008570853,0.000025064048,0.007443304,0.000054016557,0.000014523911,9.027339e-7,0.00017861223,2.1444427e-7,0.00004752829,0.010322922,0.9817117,0.00011552011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031116835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026411666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6801627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782384083","doi":"","title":"Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.03377678052959541,"score_gpt":0.2963913922807696,"score_spread":0.2626146117511742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782384083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16294514,0.00009828209,0.0000016175879,0.0069640167,0.0005563495,0.00008315963,0.00008671175,0.0000039490046,0.82926077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886427,0.00029752438,0.000172384,0.0001277863,0.00018778176,0.0000028068546,0.0000014490586,0.0000061305427,0.010561449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989092,0.000039362494,0.00019400338,0.0001266243,0.00036126788,0.0003695387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878454,0.00007532119,0.00016997142,0.0003572752,0.00013933018,0.00047357357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003443901,0.00007218858,0.00016912744,0.00009727849,0.00069359096,0.000026896318,0.0006606004,0.000056679084,0.0004587284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077750464,0.00007790984,0.000041518248,0.00008722618,0.0004269366,0.00017906772,0.00002371114,0.00007262518,0.000004424313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003161868,0.000029178254,0.057792906,0.00015063994,0.000035635643,0.00017509457,0.015208885,0.000012800535,0.00006301765,0.46021578,0.44576275,0.020521713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005506847,0.000014704667,0.03869976,0.000031732245,0.000019324916,6.5194234e-7,0.0014480529,0.0000014441408,0.000099031044,0.0004911594,0.95904726,0.00009181235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99974656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82569754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015665274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070106927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784283951","doi":"10.7202/1042777ar","title":"Le « dialogue » des parties et la vérité plurielle comme nouveau paradigme de la procédure civile québécoise","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Power (physics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.06243198502734576,"score_gpt":0.342602126200495,"score_spread":0.28017014117314926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784283951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055999037,0.0043491614,0.00010541163,0.045833565,0.0012933111,0.00019725652,0.000117362804,0.00006108104,0.8920438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898535,0.004416634,0.0005246465,0.00083397265,0.00085423654,0.00001654021,0.0000020772427,0.000038258408,0.0034601334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625206,0.0015632024,0.0004452412,0.00030148792,0.0005084149,0.00092960685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755055,0.00079216436,0.0004696799,0.0004167259,0.00016670368,0.0006042086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033908612,0.00030205425,0.00041250768,0.000037305195,0.018811006,0.0012458161,0.0010722288,0.00037009796,0.00023926648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007071799,0.00029625525,0.00029354953,0.0000873377,0.004424602,0.0017090297,0.00021079349,0.0010315364,0.00011063303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006895683,0.00030959267,0.0020529944,0.00009192001,0.00006349205,0.0004251658,0.010454369,0.000081908,0.000039775332,0.97516364,0.0049463264,0.0063018734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047794732,0.00013233168,0.0026546458,0.0005689562,0.000106555904,0.00063618436,0.0032762,0.000041808777,0.00026038446,0.062965766,0.9285204,0.0003588683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18009573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56329304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93385446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017901997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003516925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786609162","doi":"10.29173/alr1360","title":"Defence Disclosure: Is the Right to Full Answer the Right to Ambush","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Silence; Law; Set (abstract data type); Statement (logic); Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Position (finance); Common law; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03570520392435393,"score_gpt":0.313282738327093,"score_spread":0.2775775344027391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786609162","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020084027,0.055999756,0.000023057195,0.60573184,0.00048694364,0.0015102739,0.0000067312435,0.000032135722,0.33420086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6293144,0.06352204,0.00018282628,0.23590657,0.0009156061,0.00036884137,0.0000025546997,0.000040686286,0.06974646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771976,0.00039785219,0.00035163772,0.00040726687,0.00059468905,0.00052879204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977454,0.00095307454,0.00008879967,0.0008374222,0.0001063218,0.0002689986],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656766,0.0002042488,0.00032292027,0.000011898361,0.0012925414,0.00018504524,0.0013228884,0.000056600886,0.007941894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058273145,0.00009941363,0.00021732297,0.0007198888,0.00034758658,0.00025040712,0.00013800937,0.00017773538,0.006855937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003950269,0.000036484154,0.00007494141,0.00014622395,0.000017628205,0.0000058424503,0.006120238,6.031152e-7,0.000009979259,0.41210932,0.5750984,0.0063763876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024457202,0.000036800906,0.00006940705,0.0010646797,0.00010344186,0.0000062105846,0.00007080768,0.0000016832022,0.000031800566,0.00072078005,0.9976766,0.00019333247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021753943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15057883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62730604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053294887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029551557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787300424","doi":"10.4000/books.pum.6643","title":"Hommage à Denis Szabo et aux professeurs de l’École de criminologie de l’Université de Montréal","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.053715143453711395,"score_gpt":0.26777546757250137,"score_spread":0.21406032411878997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787300424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37461725,0.0104331635,0.0020080283,0.011772975,0.00054019416,0.0011614582,0.00025411643,0.0005743922,0.5986384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49200708,0.012859623,0.007484259,0.0025173312,0.0006423154,0.000048665337,0.000051474264,0.00024840556,0.48414087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314374,0.0009001315,0.00061574375,0.0013154193,0.0009335383,0.0030914368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948361,0.0012625228,0.0007212008,0.0010989744,0.00041238527,0.0016688498],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402603,0.0012037198,0.0010895019,0.00034736033,0.0036797486,0.00027837916,0.0027055575,0.0024542809,0.0045824386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040484229,0.001463355,0.00084302697,0.000116141826,0.0020699974,0.00053966435,0.0022097798,0.0025493759,0.00035463477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051898337,0.00064734375,0.042851992,0.0014641067,0.001642594,0.02762885,0.20891571,0.0019438491,0.053386264,0.5359728,0.058872722,0.061483968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026251364,0.0007207014,0.04627872,0.0012556751,0.004215007,0.0015868151,0.01976768,0.0014024555,0.0152366245,0.04081943,0.8628288,0.0032629913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1332481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23797914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80395603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007363238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021829498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787804057","doi":"","title":"Toronto Innocence Project Tackles 1983 Brantford Murder Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06137030841555057,"score_gpt":0.38934823812425534,"score_spread":0.32797792970870476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787804057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27612618,0.0004749034,0.0012856056,0.013022448,0.0005526362,0.00046688376,0.000009822107,0.00030174045,0.7077598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696403,0.00027817843,0.0005577594,0.00027544846,0.00022472155,0.000013305914,1.9622873e-7,0.0000059891418,0.02900411],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898463,0.00007521971,0.00013599888,0.00021640952,0.00025365697,0.00033409288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942064,0.00019304329,0.000035392077,0.00016495946,0.00009403991,0.00009192909],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042456805,0.00008478368,0.00009532353,0.000015431395,0.00038751154,0.000064202315,0.00020172067,0.000060197024,0.002406345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026666492,0.000050762996,0.000043439417,0.00010346606,0.00025084193,0.0007871316,0.000046205667,0.000028940325,0.00017494934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066543405,0.00010410799,0.004518239,0.00003462049,0.000020271164,0.00086260255,0.027482342,9.159735e-8,0.00175173,0.43335396,0.07859424,0.45321125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018959005,0.000068444955,0.00038092516,0.00006401216,0.000013787555,0.00011960774,0.021522911,0.0000027519798,0.00043821207,0.0010576135,0.97588456,0.00025756017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.162468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31623527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89729035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012453235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018461225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787935789","doi":"10.29173/alr1283","title":"Legislative Reform and Equal Access to the Justice System: An Examination of Alberta's New Minor Injury Cap in the Context of Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Law; Economic Justice; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Minor (academic); Political science; Constitution; Nova scotia; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04360210762322076,"score_gpt":0.3326266104978964,"score_spread":0.2890245028746756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787935789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84635687,0.012087976,0.0000044630515,0.02036838,0.00027070782,0.002491915,0.000022623013,0.0000024338065,0.11839466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984055,0.0005537392,0.00000611738,0.00055693055,0.00008425136,0.000014344955,0.000001476174,0.0000032460582,0.0003743787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986732,0.00044154565,0.0003741342,0.00013287744,0.00024653785,0.00013172535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987781,0.0005017774,0.00027508062,0.00024362374,0.00012988671,0.00007152907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011066088,0.00008549492,0.00027118583,0.000029911276,0.00019109387,0.000023070575,0.00037272877,0.00005557883,0.00002659571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021596128,0.00004294121,0.000038807557,0.00027654864,0.00033102158,0.0003967391,0.000034031604,0.00007636418,0.0000010124728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039402945,0.00006403729,0.0006383825,0.0038994227,0.000039685183,3.2477578e-7,0.19210865,0.000002542176,0.000096930664,0.7667554,0.0016810861,0.034674138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010149542,0.0010193806,0.07539409,0.024172625,0.002580094,0.000029385808,0.042921912,0.00017996739,0.0018582877,0.0006792013,0.84940755,0.0007425295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84772646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008659034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013264512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17510916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788177574","doi":"10.29173/alr1314","title":"Brief Investigatory Detentions: A Critique of R. v. Simpson","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Discretion; Enumerated powers; Doctrine; Political science; High Court; Parliament; Jurisprudence; Separation of powers; Power (physics); Democracy; Constitution; Charter; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04229899534236255,"score_gpt":0.3577575826494064,"score_spread":0.31545858730704385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788177574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019981422,0.3871136,0.00016521357,0.113858715,0.00050435535,0.0017463685,0.000007995591,0.0001072313,0.47651508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8645782,0.115769885,0.00074726564,0.01737839,0.00012699002,0.000064951,0.000004795585,0.000016452048,0.0013130727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989611,0.00012733167,0.00030061006,0.00016923007,0.00023683296,0.00020489962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991995,0.00021680434,0.00009904808,0.0002297017,0.00010794707,0.00014697986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005743845,0.0000859824,0.00024982882,0.000012873071,0.00020938602,0.0000193357,0.00024113816,0.000054591444,0.00027972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011317519,0.00008043757,0.00013657153,0.00022583382,0.00048590716,0.00027706008,0.000028978213,0.0000822612,0.00011207172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.339333e-7,0.000028179444,0.0000601686,0.00090952875,0.000005775567,0.0000022151844,0.0004150342,5.573352e-7,0.000028717619,0.9949926,0.0019872037,0.0015691746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073329815,0.000027855045,0.00007738572,0.005808415,0.00007496446,0.000003364586,0.00006370001,1.4712113e-7,0.00015870357,0.016451357,0.9771507,0.00011007141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14045396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11378736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97854125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004919268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022355551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788185674","doi":"10.7202/1043361ar","title":"Le renvoi : un instrument de défense important dans les poursuites Américaines contre les Canadiens","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06133054588687164,"score_gpt":0.3228278215796482,"score_spread":0.26149727569277653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788185674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76415586,0.010722936,0.00019913964,0.18545838,0.0008303465,0.000242286,0.00012129035,0.00011331133,0.038156442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677535,0.020377789,0.0015078976,0.00020190039,0.00037046336,0.000036402183,0.000011499676,0.000028586857,0.009711939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969148,0.0007120958,0.00052820775,0.0005221089,0.00046911495,0.00085364183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975105,0.0007095984,0.000586277,0.00050352607,0.00030892744,0.0003811803],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001678093,0.00035500288,0.0004372996,0.000069803864,0.003993302,0.00066398,0.0007628624,0.00030450695,0.00013373929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020661196,0.00035226138,0.00019781286,0.00014949177,0.002928832,0.0012530482,0.00010309759,0.0003443264,0.000022543918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009894583,0.00025501754,0.45674026,0.00019920888,0.00017633868,0.00025962084,0.030323029,0.0006787582,0.0007620473,0.16363798,0.012201919,0.33466688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053775223,0.00028400676,0.5940261,0.0013878642,0.00027794915,0.000080074075,0.022179173,0.0014416721,0.0021799584,0.017736908,0.35904783,0.0008207254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6263225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7965087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34684592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003987262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006656636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788220173","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.38","title":"Plea Bargaining under the Common Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Constitutionality; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Economics; Supreme court; Geography","score_opus":0.10959591741947135,"score_gpt":0.3686482351885158,"score_spread":0.25905231776904447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788220173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012900447,0.002266492,0.000038055117,0.0067665316,0.0014201347,0.00023956939,0.000011925309,0.000082938604,0.9890453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28374892,0.016413568,0.000041991265,0.0038433487,0.0014230408,0.0000123722975,0.000036045214,0.000024968558,0.69445574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980984,0.00027795637,0.00021126564,0.00028835697,0.0006818546,0.00044220584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849725,0.00082709943,0.000113035254,0.00039492204,0.00007035036,0.000097366305],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073168776,0.00018759453,0.0003034799,0.00002577741,0.00090383796,0.00028573856,0.0008527984,0.00035802467,0.002429239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037003338,0.00011613813,0.00014167307,0.00012988232,0.0004485865,0.00015522446,0.00015798412,0.0005780893,0.0012130566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028868471,0.000006881665,0.00003407524,0.000020282387,0.0000141048395,0.000001570709,0.0010573159,0.000001872924,4.178653e-8,0.70151484,0.29299927,0.004346877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004053789,0.000017964172,0.000045002016,0.00021322975,0.000047344416,8.9274573e-7,0.010236917,0.0000035231628,0.0000010325249,0.016315216,0.9728893,0.00018902107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04940533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06297222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6851996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013829129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004436276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788667413","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court confirms plaintiffs' ability to obtain disclosure of wiretap evidence obtained in connection with criminal competition law investigations (Imperial Oil)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Competition (biology)","score_opus":0.026632222436148094,"score_gpt":0.27651343996927363,"score_spread":0.24988121753312553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788667413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.755427,0.000083497995,0.00049492274,0.19306634,0.0006144241,0.00087507645,0.00008128844,0.000114159026,0.049243268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745923,0.00003433938,0.0009572392,0.000681743,0.0002521828,0.0001466752,0.000032883072,0.000015600372,0.0004200755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705666,0.00086616894,0.00049626094,0.00042124448,0.0006059951,0.00055365585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971335,0.0013775175,0.00015145246,0.00042529177,0.00048900244,0.00042326236],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026942848,0.00020122628,0.00028040193,0.00013789129,0.0024689287,0.00025809798,0.0004593848,0.00013064533,0.0010558566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020027861,0.00017027835,0.0000795985,0.0005086357,0.0018829765,0.00019033636,0.00004007796,0.00029571695,0.00015462705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013937373,0.000074465555,0.0026370296,0.00006718679,0.0000098223445,0.000003905333,0.007903111,0.00032014854,0.0006216246,0.9863348,0.0016467854,0.00024173647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094165077,0.000636287,0.043232027,0.0016111764,0.00012930155,0.00001788882,0.016502285,0.0002012123,0.000604076,0.01102066,0.9243472,0.0007562179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5096557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9625023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97531414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050417753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071079656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788828802","doi":"","title":"The Canadian law dictionary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02264744216608287,"score_gpt":0.259527525284474,"score_spread":0.23688008311839112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788828802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003206142,0.00028230896,0.000001145905,0.030385775,0.00061914604,0.00017929736,0.00006376662,0.000022369208,0.96524006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296599,0.0010826321,0.000038334136,0.00091408554,0.00042173042,0.000020706671,0.00000204791,0.000013122354,0.06784743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849564,0.00010129668,0.00021051097,0.00017968814,0.00034179696,0.0006710669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812365,0.00031685748,0.0000581004,0.00027065477,0.00012217362,0.0011085733],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005700534,0.00010236408,0.00011617028,0.0001731402,0.0020029347,0.00006316169,0.00046536728,0.00011243806,0.00033786418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023867503,0.00006851596,0.00006970877,0.0002039753,0.00080834224,0.00021759758,0.0000147104,0.00008523493,0.00013001372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033354347,0.000001822746,0.0026824148,0.0000021373592,0.0000072692706,0.000016791018,0.00065961696,1.5081086e-7,0.0000034522186,0.9325466,0.05015169,0.013924707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055953584,0.000015624955,0.006544277,0.00002954387,0.000010396654,0.000001880964,0.00027716087,1.675099e-7,0.00000622148,0.008767161,0.9841768,0.000114817056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005928488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035353173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788954873","doi":"10.11575/prism/34314","title":"Spinning Wheels in the Castle: A lost Decade for Sustainability in Southwestern Alberta","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Geography; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.09380505524430019,"score_gpt":0.41358909701403324,"score_spread":0.3197840417697331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788954873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92166233,0.000045736557,0.000026672335,0.0073020533,0.000053416865,0.0010443069,0.000002469046,3.4631844e-7,0.06986269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548835,0.0000024853543,0.00032861796,0.00010919791,0.000026250804,0.000041584914,8.768123e-7,0.0000037369537,0.003998909],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988599,0.00027860026,0.00017567971,0.00022178757,0.00014346755,0.0003205576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912894,0.00057052576,0.000042800868,0.00016552668,0.000049636914,0.0000425838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026613038,0.000067715104,0.00011625576,0.000029706114,0.00017863855,0.00024017268,0.00050554576,0.000058174104,0.00047339092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017463805,0.000053342475,0.000029633013,0.00024846412,0.00012067837,0.00029295884,0.000046226953,0.00009855105,0.00005474182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017662821,0.0003818902,0.31893653,0.0000635245,0.000008440558,0.000086306994,0.5711384,0.000071584764,0.000054104283,0.03640161,0.0009809951,0.07169999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062591967,0.00008041943,0.017436016,0.00009719167,0.000015049752,0.0000045830475,0.17938477,0.000022118295,0.00014972164,0.01032131,0.7916206,0.00024229752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042652696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42086703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79063964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013487312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035511478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96372235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789024057","doi":"10.29173/alr1288","title":"Rules of Court Project","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Law; Project charter; Business; Project management; Political science; Project management triangle; Computer science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.056870058364180354,"score_gpt":0.382275348462692,"score_spread":0.32540529009851166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789024057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036907955,0.12146893,0.000003956268,0.04316155,0.00010504815,0.0006104047,0.0000029155863,0.00002376231,0.8309326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.679965,0.2946489,0.0013687433,0.008631203,0.00052885414,0.000061676954,0.0000080414875,0.00001917223,0.01476837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914455,0.00011275476,0.00022224401,0.00012248987,0.00022509113,0.00017288463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938446,0.0002401453,0.00008662731,0.0001764337,0.000063608844,0.00004869393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054409116,0.000066320456,0.00022292123,0.000008799558,0.00013103415,0.0000136960625,0.00023197176,0.000031664145,0.0006185001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028676263,0.000053535903,0.00009402485,0.00010190524,0.0001999218,0.00019189996,0.00002388834,0.00004762603,0.00036608664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001824536,0.000030511386,0.00007571001,0.00068007264,0.0000071949903,5.486406e-7,0.0007344366,8.737257e-8,0.000005857449,0.9387646,0.034914758,0.024784412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025805699,0.000012714759,0.000025865627,0.001637887,0.000047634287,0.0000013498471,0.000031512474,8.2848794e-7,0.000025513556,0.00026705713,0.99785477,0.000069073096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05949451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05933866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023486127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009282276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95782596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789237171","doi":"10.5553/rdw/138064242017038002003","title":"Het besluitvormingsproces van civiele rechters in procedures over de gevolgen van een (echt)scheiding met een beschuldiging van seksueel kindermisbruik","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Recht der Werkelijkheid","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Context (archaeology); False accusation; Child sexual abuse; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Child abuse; Social psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.053365089582501274,"score_gpt":0.37743775456552375,"score_spread":0.32407266498302245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789237171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76970845,0.0026210223,0.000605526,0.007927268,0.0008217625,0.0013704073,0.000032810447,0.00052601437,0.2163867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108976,0.0011465774,0.0021996251,0.0007997762,0.0007480601,0.00010096083,0.000011096042,0.00008646097,0.0038176572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510425,0.000368695,0.0007308867,0.0010532943,0.0010834943,0.0016593823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973242,0.0004511743,0.00054956035,0.00092856906,0.00019881577,0.00054763065],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033812353,0.0005386791,0.0006968793,0.00030628277,0.0023949076,0.0010208036,0.0019068602,0.00051595096,0.00047415757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032360947,0.0005552296,0.00027081915,0.00042126141,0.0005015315,0.0021520464,0.0003982099,0.00074886275,0.00014542673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064633763,0.00085840694,0.549363,0.0015799776,0.0006486144,0.000753752,0.089429475,0.0002409573,0.02430624,0.032251336,0.021962903,0.27795896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025547212,0.00040943068,0.06080236,0.0031487918,0.00062515266,0.00010142381,0.01845873,0.00071546284,0.02445165,0.065194204,0.81984997,0.0036880823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008238278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012292948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7978871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006068551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010397572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789292187","doi":"","title":"Ramsay's appeals cases: with notes and definitions of the civil and criminal law of the province of Quebec, including a large number [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.0503758408984799,"score_gpt":0.290817566300573,"score_spread":0.24044172540209308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789292187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70297915,0.00018044563,0.0000036393083,0.0018460345,0.00006319584,0.00036117385,0.00021452521,0.0000037821296,0.29434806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986931,0.0002700445,0.00009032025,0.00011367889,0.00003577795,0.0000071113036,7.267936e-7,0.000007729455,0.0007815181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896467,0.0001018659,0.00024833108,0.00014947739,0.00028590893,0.0002497433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986696,0.0003084258,0.00036855007,0.000373956,0.00012877515,0.00015066643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040917637,0.00010166702,0.00023757367,0.000042116993,0.0008607285,0.00003467717,0.00039912845,0.00006745674,0.000025355548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049845513,0.00006773618,0.000054462267,0.000080192825,0.0018362941,0.00020453396,0.000114636256,0.00009449766,2.9200748e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002813505,0.0000320912,0.0899353,0.00029396266,0.000024313857,0.000012581534,0.009742133,0.0000013366097,0.00006209437,0.8982931,0.00069773,0.00087726046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001533887,0.0002962366,0.6403232,0.0038122786,0.0009783491,0.00008078455,0.019203065,0.000011165128,0.0020971664,0.023611994,0.30717817,0.0008736611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9322194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99875355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87468106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003803982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010479435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6765902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789323451","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code of Canada ; and, the Canada Evidence Act: with their amendments, including the amending acts of 1900 and 1901, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Criminology; Criminal law; Programming language; Sociology; Computer science; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04512774575006161,"score_gpt":0.27831594266083187,"score_spread":0.23318819691077025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789323451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75244063,0.0023217036,0.0000020782416,0.023432774,0.00039784293,0.0007224784,0.00014053083,0.0000051062393,0.22053683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521005,0.0030525972,0.000024821464,0.00023938177,0.00008069099,0.000015769087,5.8031367e-7,0.000010132535,0.0013659718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981687,0.0001805811,0.0003286511,0.00020373311,0.0006189613,0.00049936917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969212,0.0016109586,0.00049561594,0.0005134279,0.00014178755,0.00031704863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001397715,0.00016350583,0.00029879552,0.000046037614,0.0027091564,0.0001107061,0.0009796658,0.000042459087,0.0000115992425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094403373,0.00008570646,0.00003306458,0.000097043434,0.0019484187,0.00023245053,0.00012535752,0.00017536659,4.8403656e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093081774,0.000024628864,0.14055608,0.0005978739,0.00044560138,0.00012612597,0.077704035,0.00005073054,0.00019247079,0.7057454,0.024321824,0.049304415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053215964,0.00008299838,0.0780386,0.0007615219,0.00021699614,0.000014017016,0.02925575,0.000027815322,0.00037976902,0.0011501135,0.889205,0.00033528838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002889932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074833566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789383471","doi":"","title":"Crankshaw's Criminal code of Canada; a commentary on the Criminal law of Canada including an appendix containing all relevant [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal code; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0670297515716922,"score_gpt":0.3083096560830036,"score_spread":0.24127990451131137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789383471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4462745,0.00010931079,0.0000016202323,0.035949226,0.00060100976,0.0004530175,0.00060934713,0.000009313655,0.51599264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157363,0.00009270775,0.000096422096,0.0069623017,0.00017144514,0.000012794533,0.000018073599,0.000021738566,0.001050904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970835,0.00023033592,0.00058720866,0.00031500877,0.0009854565,0.00079848664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971635,0.000580778,0.0005646385,0.0007379283,0.00021608328,0.0007370695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011968722,0.00023166789,0.00046620413,0.00011595002,0.0017257133,0.000055862216,0.0013878291,0.00008635532,0.00021338977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005651684,0.00020945347,0.00008136719,0.00007638688,0.0007914265,0.0002606171,0.0000969791,0.00027723738,7.537241e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003324665,0.000058472535,0.0057148994,0.00021248574,0.0001170577,0.0003113103,0.017335216,0.0000477905,0.00010738855,0.69835764,0.27516198,0.0022432655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024976823,0.00021127942,0.0063243727,0.0003073511,0.00014128622,0.0000046762925,0.013493626,0.000026152573,0.00036004354,0.0007953376,0.9777765,0.00030955637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99997675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70261455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007993157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00872063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789428332","doi":"","title":"Update '92: what's new in the law!: Edmonton, Alberta, May 28, 1993, Calgary, Alberta, May 31, 1993.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019255249835190173,"score_gpt":0.26289198773813294,"score_spread":0.24363673790294277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789428332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0241752,0.0011327543,0.000004276672,0.09056675,0.00082927616,0.00067493453,0.000023048664,0.000024129804,0.8825696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7438375,0.0052899676,0.0001689391,0.006544108,0.0011200374,0.00007094862,0.000019899617,0.00005432466,0.2428943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671715,0.0003209724,0.00060190476,0.00048632332,0.0006806297,0.001193021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970404,0.0009775594,0.00018666328,0.00070083095,0.00008502965,0.0010095543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093207974,0.00033454652,0.0004333286,0.00029135894,0.00047583142,0.00022027083,0.0013114465,0.00025750804,0.0008857157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038335408,0.00023864266,0.00018056504,0.0004635309,0.00060282386,0.0012252418,0.000062274565,0.00024030395,0.00041687157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039799204,0.000035625777,0.004882071,0.000023425991,0.00002791121,0.00008996768,0.015856309,0.0000010149084,0.000016447493,0.71334654,0.22082938,0.044851527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003333321,0.00004747696,0.004928503,0.00020956823,0.000045383615,0.000007052627,0.0021419865,7.52303e-7,0.000022189392,0.004590772,0.98729306,0.00037994533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76646364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003849173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021089716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789485244","doi":"","title":"Understanding Charter decisions: a guide to judicial reasoning and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.053047364268047695,"score_gpt":0.284264058982167,"score_spread":0.23121669471411932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789485244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10051145,0.00047396604,0.00015575107,0.031225435,0.00047992513,0.0008378337,0.0001292478,0.000017741397,0.8661687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99496037,0.00034449704,0.00024320216,0.000552156,0.00022306203,0.000014510095,7.4346826e-7,0.000010100016,0.003651383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856645,0.000109594504,0.00029810597,0.0002328971,0.00031116753,0.00048175827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817204,0.0005109513,0.00008615222,0.00020644332,0.00009075281,0.0009336511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009234648,0.00012287503,0.00025629948,0.00038186953,0.0007508889,0.000055843833,0.00024507116,0.000101487545,0.00011331795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000622767,0.00007999876,0.000046350353,0.00019663865,0.000903756,0.00018189079,0.000028480497,0.000070357426,0.0000073220517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004628025,0.0000030068334,0.00357184,0.000006591316,0.0000238518,0.000021097467,0.013768107,1.8486081e-7,0.000018797396,0.9436772,0.03384085,0.00502221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005974756,0.000052260304,0.00738522,0.00041495074,0.00004837748,0.000005953307,0.0014800854,0.0000031422937,0.000011120882,0.036166124,0.9536231,0.0002121676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003330631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009934586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5775306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789578454","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada, relating to criminal law and to procedure in criminal cases: passed in [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Parliament; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.030462463604504567,"score_gpt":0.2838917775752629,"score_spread":0.25342931397075835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789578454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86001414,0.000041401243,1.509087e-7,0.0037417253,0.0001471489,0.0004838574,0.000036629528,9.909625e-7,0.13553393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987555,0.000020602854,0.000086657245,0.0003262334,0.000035498033,0.000015770938,2.6798546e-7,0.0000069325333,0.0007525019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984989,0.00011237502,0.0004303051,0.00018360605,0.00043376072,0.00034101238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987816,0.00018381832,0.00029728346,0.0003746323,0.00010219405,0.0002604412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006403563,0.00010824081,0.0002734409,0.00011248473,0.0002870924,0.00001718218,0.000590742,0.000071990515,0.000011196885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013757955,0.00008287988,0.000043339896,0.00017502664,0.000323003,0.00011188415,0.00009492225,0.00012378026,1.3079008e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034211422,0.00011711659,0.43117595,0.0012893983,0.000032196727,0.00009286559,0.15472306,0.0002235421,0.0015910658,0.39737844,0.0074389735,0.005595254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038903297,0.00014208893,0.89242405,0.0015870485,0.0000678335,0.0000049003843,0.019731358,0.000005729609,0.0017875361,0.0006123093,0.083007365,0.00024075506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46124807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025281846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030706255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54471576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789589349","doi":"","title":"The transformation of Canadian law: 1937-1982","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02436261338366802,"score_gpt":0.25539014604866905,"score_spread":0.23102753266500103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789589349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021764446,0.00020372636,0.0000031459836,0.016262619,0.0003200022,0.00025893218,0.00013412621,0.000012365001,0.9610406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548293,0.0019565404,0.000035706038,0.00030347533,0.00014345458,0.000013626758,0.0000033465233,0.000010187971,0.012050736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985763,0.000094886025,0.00032616843,0.00013079122,0.00032551435,0.00054635503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985762,0.00024196475,0.000095161224,0.00023330134,0.00013903753,0.0007143225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065650436,0.00010132751,0.00015678152,0.00039319124,0.00062792527,0.000029042036,0.00042691812,0.00010527243,0.0001944888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017021723,0.000069911344,0.0000817598,0.0003691263,0.00054437603,0.00029500003,0.000006187768,0.0000664244,0.00003428783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006926437,0.000002697074,0.00051465625,0.000011972886,0.000009036596,0.0000039704105,0.004349475,7.705536e-7,0.000045345092,0.9642739,0.011972168,0.018809035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009192079,0.000025398862,0.002233441,0.00005572442,0.000016311116,6.676245e-7,0.0008998535,5.4320157e-7,0.000114072864,0.002868595,0.9935857,0.00010775166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000251681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002201283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48295566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789653898","doi":"","title":"Gangsterism: Canada's law of criminal organizations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.022552951469887696,"score_gpt":0.2727643352926782,"score_spread":0.2502113838227905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789653898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07892315,0.00008043755,0.0000034387315,0.0038810773,0.00044247272,0.00014850117,0.00010836382,0.000009783583,0.91640276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98606825,0.00015276046,0.0001771115,0.00032771064,0.00018800865,0.000004049004,0.000006445834,0.00001310875,0.01306254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880785,0.000045546087,0.00026041112,0.00016165462,0.0003599072,0.0003646165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985184,0.00006692745,0.0002126971,0.00043515902,0.0002940519,0.00047277036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021747542,0.00010101333,0.00021079353,0.00010402697,0.0010054993,0.000056480872,0.00067133957,0.00007852166,0.00037850608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049935706,0.00011212756,0.000038242888,0.0001237328,0.00052854273,0.00021925407,0.000038584923,0.00007856531,0.0000059870076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090105395,0.000016738395,0.013425773,0.00008247587,0.000022952454,0.000069270944,0.007773409,0.000003148888,0.00004676125,0.9259243,0.049631685,0.0029944968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077628676,0.000019545201,0.026568443,0.00005025973,0.000049455226,0.0000017932873,0.0016938896,9.1116635e-7,0.0001446718,0.000763699,0.97047997,0.00014976662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99982244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018274553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048076636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8528589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789657666","doi":"10.29173/alr1366","title":"A Triumph of Liberalism: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Exclusion of Evidence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Seriousness; Charter; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09589099118009374,"score_gpt":0.31981860132533957,"score_spread":0.22392761014524581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789657666","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048337,0.6078635,0.000002737046,0.28708935,0.0002178076,0.0014861427,0.0000073825395,0.000005539754,0.054990567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456418,0.15076303,0.00001204587,0.0017431919,0.00002271464,0.000008736705,1.8271705e-7,0.0000032989738,0.0018050025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984693,0.00044579484,0.00038468305,0.00010997846,0.0004476934,0.00014256554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651426,0.0027367382,0.00026261716,0.00030275123,0.00013721711,0.00004642917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001525629,0.000074030286,0.00035842753,0.000005148852,0.00019194194,0.000007931095,0.00041051142,0.000025854428,0.00038212613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013549335,0.00003439177,0.00008410794,0.0002032141,0.0008458669,0.00012216326,0.00007663331,0.00006348172,0.0000014764576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307477,0.000057615256,0.0008356755,0.004891413,0.000058344063,0.0000023604991,0.014042623,0.000002063944,0.00008928327,0.89379656,0.076666795,0.0094942115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026393152,0.000049582686,0.00047047768,0.009788677,0.0003185835,0.000006769498,0.00029981037,0.000033458455,0.00019100924,0.0010824575,0.9873647,0.00013055932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9582467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9424522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019294966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012797855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41840133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789673800","doi":"","title":"A treatise on criminal law as applicable to the Dominion of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02684177489962293,"score_gpt":0.2896069637019608,"score_spread":0.2627651888023379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789673800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08540134,0.00004192819,8.586893e-7,0.010237596,0.00026787986,0.00034517853,0.000080802245,0.0000054128773,0.903619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704385,0.000082481056,0.000065911845,0.0010682162,0.00023974729,0.000031331718,0.0000015340103,0.00001026129,0.028062036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986175,0.00005869292,0.00022175815,0.00020273241,0.00046458916,0.00043475197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984342,0.0001556108,0.00015200346,0.00058342447,0.00009518479,0.0005795911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041545357,0.00011623736,0.00021451662,0.00007980171,0.0011813166,0.000058731588,0.0008031469,0.0000631674,0.00020232573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033763415,0.00009600052,0.000055659297,0.00008215114,0.00031383606,0.00010806967,0.00003510916,0.000091513364,0.00001960466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054498414,0.000015335121,0.0009036845,0.000028543283,0.000013947082,0.000036138925,0.0049350243,0.0000140838065,0.000012404013,0.89101136,0.08661904,0.016355913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094205185,0.00007639167,0.007726563,0.000058460733,0.000028763641,0.0000011720113,0.0011109061,8.9090804e-7,0.00014238014,0.0011004496,0.9895419,0.00011792706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90292287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002424671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029663804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90858513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789925663","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment: Criminal code (1954) judicially considered","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05898467493305496,"score_gpt":0.3172819403649254,"score_spread":0.2582972654318704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789925663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018627526,0.00036926568,9.662447e-7,0.026860742,0.0011032264,0.00039270995,0.00015434001,0.000022369051,0.9524689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97073025,0.0011433794,0.00010562747,0.0010230561,0.00057980855,0.00002470506,0.0000061847245,0.00002296901,0.02636402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997533,0.00012803398,0.00037576605,0.00031089768,0.0005615137,0.0010907655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683225,0.00025334186,0.00025610454,0.000782119,0.0002541513,0.0016220362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010979666,0.0001918161,0.00026680547,0.0002544654,0.0077395057,0.00055311713,0.0013430428,0.00017680562,0.00022579356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013982159,0.0001781905,0.00011581359,0.00010440379,0.0015865801,0.0003148775,0.000048511,0.00023885258,0.00009121809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025433766,0.000010202868,0.011262524,0.000024588278,0.000045881025,0.00024324458,0.006358774,0.0000022712534,0.0000073250767,0.80515826,0.15338798,0.023473518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012833584,0.000029116567,0.03586815,0.00005290897,0.000058892874,0.000004390736,0.001164188,0.0000025685665,0.000013626977,0.0047286907,0.95772576,0.0002233556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99917793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006071333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098589845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790009439","doi":"","title":"A subject-index to the books in the library of the Law Society of Upper Canada at Osgoode Hall : Toronto, January, 1st, 1923","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Index (typography); Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.013692326278774938,"score_gpt":0.22756318904292905,"score_spread":0.21387086276415412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790009439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07714292,0.0006825398,7.8122275e-7,0.038070615,0.00030674489,0.0006503418,0.00021352795,0.00000808916,0.88292444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622488,0.00045672015,0.00003301633,0.0038871597,0.00018557195,0.00003265765,0.0000014916952,0.000015768774,0.03313884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782616,0.00028171224,0.00041444678,0.00023733218,0.0006824004,0.00055797864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983812,0.0005080824,0.0001683955,0.0006029316,0.00006293484,0.00027644818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064147805,0.00016675517,0.0002628979,0.000029688295,0.00037869188,0.000022200873,0.0013663577,0.00010687883,0.00029418062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009515777,0.00008544224,0.00018070545,0.0002233652,0.000550866,0.0002452589,0.00012657016,0.00012167095,0.0000030285908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046247733,0.000024674518,0.055697013,0.000056493307,0.000040206516,0.000008722004,0.027450906,0.000006296715,0.00008859298,0.29608998,0.61684215,0.003648691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012419053,0.0000300203,0.040196966,0.00011399253,0.000021068312,0.0000014425742,0.003928015,0.0000011778536,0.00017676104,0.0009870472,0.95428234,0.00013697606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99949765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88510585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047793976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037050429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6572587},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2790048109","doi":"","title":"100 years of the Criminal Code in Canada: essays commemorating the centenary of the criminal code in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); History; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.03911979276269225,"score_gpt":0.26685640679931094,"score_spread":0.22773661403661868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790048109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8594422,0.0001545054,1.7717475e-7,0.007748821,0.00062756205,0.00037659222,0.0003039377,0.0000018081064,0.13134444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833876,0.000111834976,0.00001862065,0.0005544489,0.00007658612,0.000011049095,0.0000015515917,0.000012555989,0.0008745788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976097,0.00030537523,0.0005420698,0.00020861602,0.0007521057,0.00058217463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808353,0.0003660137,0.00045872305,0.00075060903,0.00011854413,0.00022259928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075592654,0.00015117308,0.00033073116,0.0000803208,0.0006209654,0.000028856772,0.0019702925,0.00006469512,0.000046216217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008003633,0.000108018605,0.00007799589,0.00021986547,0.0006798816,0.00013371266,0.00015244086,0.00034871098,3.6935282e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005319839,0.00003299911,0.9040388,0.00019533033,0.00002739752,0.0001505032,0.018503297,0.00030619322,0.000044747743,0.035879124,0.029820655,0.01094775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022899751,0.00001537402,0.86710894,0.00034696466,0.00005905783,0.000004187713,0.022882912,0.000056450473,0.000077086006,0.0003542628,0.1086775,0.00018828103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99999684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13889661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018186066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03438254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790117848","doi":"","title":"All about law: exploring the Canadian legal system, second edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04345530211492521,"score_gpt":0.2562554150268402,"score_spread":0.21280011291191497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790117848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022048067,0.0001846152,0.0000024695112,0.011692218,0.0016744742,0.00031721374,0.00021020026,0.000044920613,0.9638258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689511,0.00020833049,0.000039050712,0.0012115013,0.0013351926,0.0000829349,0.0000050545277,0.000022221177,0.028144626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979141,0.00015158264,0.00032906275,0.00027679,0.00044937117,0.0008791247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978566,0.00023773851,0.00009851922,0.0003700988,0.00015510028,0.0012819099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077104673,0.00016750637,0.00021643912,0.0002772323,0.001197236,0.00013429816,0.00062131154,0.000118585674,0.0006855867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015460551,0.000120179,0.00010299229,0.00020531338,0.0005376215,0.0006624468,0.000021457648,0.00014472914,0.0001637166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035860544,0.0000025074178,0.00056119816,0.000026998594,0.000017529002,0.000059298975,0.0023246245,5.425547e-7,0.000008287657,0.93413043,0.060072985,0.0027920075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009265805,0.00001617914,0.004165244,0.00014918424,0.00002630562,0.0000063523366,0.0012968476,3.4790935e-7,0.000027991104,0.0007026193,0.99332273,0.00019351202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94690305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010729969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003066798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9208293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790182070","doi":"","title":"The Canada statute and criminal code citator","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Statute; Political science; Law; Code (set theory); Statute of limitations; Criminal law; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.029613760604173183,"score_gpt":0.28437638592906817,"score_spread":0.25476262532489496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790182070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17484261,0.0005595805,9.953479e-7,0.014349229,0.00075047545,0.00020733336,0.00014214106,0.000009675972,0.80913794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676233,0.0019045032,0.00008698386,0.00039608404,0.0002530862,0.0000108240265,0.000001778973,0.000010828176,0.029712627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875975,0.000056990433,0.00017794683,0.00017102355,0.00034438237,0.0004898867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985539,0.00021493215,0.00012937821,0.00037078361,0.000097788274,0.0006332202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000444895,0.00009955293,0.00013893865,0.000052546206,0.0027727664,0.00019421773,0.0005871959,0.000052316183,0.00003906921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062650046,0.00008412582,0.000029183944,0.000041420735,0.0006852253,0.00019392994,0.000039644176,0.00010780614,0.0000030387425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032733227,0.0000061889973,0.029230474,0.00005226691,0.00003482991,0.00016545174,0.006436491,8.1310327e-7,0.000007456113,0.64524895,0.2649145,0.053869832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061256156,0.000013280828,0.055733025,0.000020026982,0.000023203782,0.0000016006488,0.0017316999,0.0000013864341,0.000005091977,0.0009890648,0.9413109,0.00010949792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99957937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7927807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018533134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047153486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790188748","doi":"","title":"Canada statute annotations : R.S.C. 1985, being a compilation of case annotations to the Revised Statutes covering the period 1971 to 1988","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Period (music); Statute of limitations; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026427720725243083,"score_gpt":0.27748338698159114,"score_spread":0.25105566625634806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790188748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6243128,0.00028634295,0.00081853225,0.15978377,0.0009643528,0.0026374885,0.0038425648,0.000046158566,0.20730796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351597,0.00009068457,0.0006248858,0.001206129,0.00015443987,0.00006136002,0.000010050859,0.000013988793,0.0043225144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983405,0.00016501456,0.00039450606,0.00021128691,0.00044149428,0.00044720666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981035,0.00062989956,0.00014118724,0.000337321,0.00031310582,0.0004749944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054289476,0.00013090955,0.0001907149,0.00018919795,0.001004675,0.00005825694,0.0003726032,0.000038172064,0.00008419952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008398716,0.0000875933,0.000055130105,0.000634315,0.0001806663,0.00021621179,0.000035790534,0.000081300015,0.000007897347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009112611,0.000038686514,0.013916348,0.00012914024,0.0001363206,0.0004282214,0.149046,0.0017351325,0.00044414515,0.4411054,0.30431366,0.088615835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086276625,0.000033538847,0.012349165,0.000110940986,0.000039461458,0.000008934968,0.005040229,0.000007427328,0.000028426226,0.000259066,0.9818913,0.00014528034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6775776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038029146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043295403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.772725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790198200","doi":"","title":"The criminal law in Canadian society","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03360786720040559,"score_gpt":0.2998870056394943,"score_spread":0.2662791384390887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790198200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036687568,0.00027082357,2.1281278e-7,0.013531952,0.0004937129,0.00021905468,0.000032533095,0.000009449938,0.94875467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98004216,0.0011209261,0.00009163647,0.00084491697,0.00030876807,0.000018518283,0.0000024026115,0.00001303635,0.01755762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998161,0.000075597316,0.00024701777,0.00021593577,0.00031201402,0.0009884102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804586,0.00015057903,0.00011445403,0.0005332042,0.00008170449,0.0010741928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011057991,0.00012456578,0.00017221944,0.0001103148,0.00344056,0.00025821594,0.0010822096,0.00014079291,0.000105117055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003658103,0.000112532296,0.00011313167,0.00010101301,0.0010969589,0.00031650937,0.000033683784,0.00020404282,0.000028940483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005025974,0.0000046075547,0.01747493,0.00001396749,0.00000896817,0.00004792765,0.0073534353,0.0000010604263,0.0000017032634,0.93751734,0.028816437,0.008754587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007785061,0.0000123645505,0.0373795,0.000033989592,0.000014947777,0.0000011163564,0.0020586208,0.000003592578,0.0000043638465,0.003061797,0.95720977,0.00014206987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005546551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041716215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790302541","doi":"","title":"The criminal law in Canadian society: highlights = Le Droit penal dans la societe canadienne: faits saillants","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.019949912796070658,"score_gpt":0.25634187091507427,"score_spread":0.2363919581190036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790302541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16595222,0.0020764498,7.391986e-7,0.04665279,0.0020227204,0.00046096728,0.0004952434,0.000016090038,0.78232276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90855074,0.005296429,0.000113515714,0.0008996297,0.0007272515,0.000035957208,0.000016968477,0.00005497426,0.084304556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946858,0.00034650808,0.00070381234,0.0006814618,0.0005985401,0.0029838257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469,0.00044819535,0.00040253374,0.000970212,0.00019859751,0.0032904893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002099768,0.00046837973,0.0005788393,0.00020453213,0.0060839257,0.0005908922,0.0022757724,0.0005805817,0.00016261912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003120559,0.00047757648,0.00038314512,0.00030556726,0.004393889,0.00077010156,0.000109630026,0.00063332205,0.00006901394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010626461,0.00001778093,0.005168351,0.00007914946,0.000060428545,0.00043635155,0.022419577,0.0000064458136,0.000005945321,0.9356294,0.030153709,0.0060122088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030956502,0.000052603224,0.04631079,0.0002621055,0.00010899044,0.000031468862,0.008398351,0.00004321469,0.000013523303,0.009085378,0.9348332,0.0005507987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99996114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9265441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029541834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016162943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790344710","doi":"","title":"The criminal code of Canada and the Canada evidence act, 1893: with an extra appendix containing the Extradition act, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminology; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04013733927693978,"score_gpt":0.27356838163152203,"score_spread":0.23343104235458226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790344710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67599094,0.0015404924,0.0000068553613,0.034273524,0.0006760309,0.0010532025,0.00018364444,0.000012869149,0.28626242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958413,0.00085736834,0.000031030533,0.00044521014,0.00020295843,0.000029679231,0.0000031950058,0.000013332301,0.0025759093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775344,0.00030301005,0.00032626034,0.00025080485,0.0007720477,0.00059442874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680907,0.0014006217,0.00041410944,0.00071057986,0.00018663754,0.0004789683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015973881,0.00017769233,0.00026633256,0.00003897918,0.0039960737,0.0002255084,0.0013056952,0.000054630087,0.000047467347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092247943,0.00009922399,0.000039245602,0.000083787374,0.0019541772,0.00044550563,0.000042326537,0.00024048386,3.9618826e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014006522,0.000023519478,0.052160837,0.00019171854,0.00019499083,0.00032667775,0.03690805,0.000049731072,0.000026164253,0.78765464,0.06583968,0.05522333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043587957,0.00013993453,0.10734826,0.00029941043,0.00018201367,0.000028388551,0.016998362,0.000046942776,0.000034178956,0.0012371724,0.8729316,0.00031784122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99996644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80709195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003530605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015184579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790488308","doi":"","title":"Crankshaw's Criminal Code: being the Criminal Code of Canada with digests of cases, histories of sections, references to articles, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.044283130305471936,"score_gpt":0.2838823829009014,"score_spread":0.23959925259542947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790488308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929808,0.0002890206,0.0000070940946,0.004513052,0.00035753974,0.00030779577,0.00035104045,0.00000784372,0.20118581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957752,0.00019130208,0.0002659289,0.00012404304,0.000083463936,0.000014963273,0.0000028140691,0.000012664356,0.0035296113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797195,0.0001083263,0.00049087097,0.00024141702,0.00073161256,0.00045582873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772096,0.000346306,0.00047317942,0.0005629487,0.00046971743,0.00042686783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057369453,0.00016330124,0.00039042888,0.00016980032,0.0008908425,0.000035613026,0.00080673676,0.000069513735,0.00006021249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089992554,0.00013362808,0.00006191829,0.00018818073,0.00101585,0.00025402132,0.000048419388,0.00013875487,3.95836e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006711404,0.00013794171,0.13483952,0.00095155236,0.00017201687,0.00032253936,0.08312538,0.00016534531,0.00037468466,0.69827384,0.06570564,0.0152604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021243925,0.00038149024,0.07623885,0.00035930652,0.0002783946,0.00002088692,0.016364988,0.0000030992896,0.0014391021,0.0007321333,0.9036501,0.000319222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99725175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83794445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029864296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055470015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790588315","doi":"","title":"The British Columbia statute citator : a complete annotating service for R.S.B.C. 1960.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Service (business); Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.03202747014790282,"score_gpt":0.26396795468914636,"score_spread":0.23194048454124355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790588315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25355417,0.00077176985,0.000083086255,0.026663257,0.0014413763,0.0019403568,0.0018947285,0.00011103192,0.71354026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7668719,0.0024410354,0.0028500692,0.0038600273,0.0014294133,0.0003975917,0.00002987112,0.000095877585,0.22202416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982595,0.000104659855,0.00033017568,0.00025134036,0.0003235444,0.0007307871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775136,0.0010097764,0.00014550245,0.00022815629,0.00034158828,0.0005236091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007492411,0.00009520028,0.000195358,0.00004593335,0.002373785,0.00051944895,0.000503637,0.00007722519,0.00011564947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007127889,0.000099957666,0.00008550392,0.0002612996,0.00032419106,0.00023627451,0.000027592436,0.000066868815,0.000016740436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042414875,0.00002104138,0.016072497,0.00013966448,0.00007081171,0.00004892847,0.006595404,9.3578484e-7,0.0001442423,0.06841707,0.63463306,0.2738139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021166982,0.00003698361,0.008958371,0.00013418065,0.000020835063,0.0000023400241,0.0010696673,0.0000027688873,0.0000014132474,0.0039390535,0.98545384,0.00016884781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98571825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5133178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017723194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014057583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790606597","doi":"","title":"Canada. Parliament. House of Commons. Sub-Committee on the Recodification of the General Part of the Criminal Code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; House of Commons; Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; House of Representatives; Select committee; Commons; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.04384357462903912,"score_gpt":0.26657919733828644,"score_spread":0.22273562270924732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790606597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91997015,0.00023419507,2.556822e-7,0.028905425,0.00078079465,0.0004115581,0.000502106,0.0000052362293,0.04919027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708736,0.0020160829,0.000018631199,0.00025997421,0.0001006699,0.000015473066,0.0000017055524,0.00001115929,0.00048894924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982408,0.00027668366,0.00041914688,0.00015965526,0.0005941173,0.0003095866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763024,0.00025153116,0.0006876773,0.001082089,0.00020559266,0.00014289112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065466797,0.00013002892,0.00024199807,0.00016215394,0.0009641809,0.000026990128,0.0016761614,0.00008524479,0.00003686391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047856188,0.00007787694,0.0001960836,0.0005902788,0.0023774977,0.00008852161,0.000064443935,0.00013945742,5.0331704e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005980459,0.00009125736,0.31823432,0.000110831716,0.00010336927,0.0000020059676,0.0053377883,0.000014724779,0.0005030089,0.21560094,0.45604566,0.0038962923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008584463,0.00003551112,0.3546082,0.00012305767,0.0000925261,3.4905491e-7,0.0020509386,0.0000016953803,0.002755537,0.0005150951,0.63962424,0.00010701406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21508585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006585836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015465091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790794665","doi":"","title":"Dominion law reports: a weekly series of reports of cases from all the courts of Canada. (Third series).","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Series (stratigraphy); Law; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.020541186561807322,"score_gpt":0.24462839067208594,"score_spread":0.22408720411027863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790794665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58124,0.00067474594,0.0000014407188,0.011202234,0.001024441,0.0005284977,0.0005596535,0.000016979104,0.40475202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880947,0.0005151386,0.00013923056,0.00015856489,0.00014288291,0.000013724282,0.000008375287,0.000015526643,0.010911899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742067,0.00014444473,0.0010211233,0.00028199935,0.00071060384,0.00042118042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971462,0.00048728913,0.0009949665,0.0006231545,0.00037756102,0.00037081685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085486594,0.00016943543,0.0004958611,0.00010200938,0.00019336228,0.000011392385,0.00029820416,0.00012488916,0.00021969927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010057329,0.00012172299,0.00011058089,0.00016764384,0.0010611613,0.0003305996,0.00004270347,0.000076975055,3.5921627e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059666287,0.0001428037,0.059867978,0.00050871837,0.0004921337,0.006460896,0.032103464,0.000012884906,0.004453317,0.48333648,0.40633982,0.0056848517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008955234,0.00009981437,0.0044569573,0.00027255437,0.000083562794,0.00009682125,0.0024261773,7.5509895e-8,0.0028608341,0.005602267,0.98383355,0.00017785229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5774937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019079534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005416023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96077925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790800774","doi":"","title":"A manual of Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.04583158987747085,"score_gpt":0.3100708088843528,"score_spread":0.26423921900688196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790800774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09402862,0.000121761324,4.885839e-7,0.0037944717,0.00042708384,0.00019862293,0.0001319584,0.000010559515,0.9012864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98011625,0.00040073073,0.00026480042,0.0004084838,0.00031584024,0.000009811152,0.0000056080667,0.000016038426,0.018462418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982483,0.00006983174,0.00032047578,0.000244752,0.0003950432,0.0007216257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976082,0.00007648432,0.00020992513,0.0005788796,0.00017889481,0.0013476193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005405296,0.0001487605,0.00029293675,0.00067350134,0.0012528871,0.00009304045,0.0009759138,0.00016114952,0.0005056782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003497085,0.00016651438,0.00011182256,0.00016796347,0.0010134495,0.00036708495,0.000035597765,0.00014286868,0.000034574005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012026619,0.000010643506,0.0048101903,0.00005455835,0.00001796539,0.00013029865,0.005833501,8.911757e-7,0.000018681987,0.9637275,0.019687377,0.0056963903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010523343,0.000042266507,0.02144922,0.00007051857,0.000051569183,0.000002872492,0.0014209221,7.7887506e-7,0.00006792796,0.0021888316,0.9744085,0.00019132684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022472917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031121445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9636321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790819898","doi":"","title":"Table of private acts: Statutes of Canada, 1867 to December 31, 1990.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Table (database); Business; Law; Political science; Database; Computer science","score_opus":0.017190522517333107,"score_gpt":0.25104132413655755,"score_spread":0.23385080161922445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790819898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28891066,0.00015933155,0.000007822235,0.0034624594,0.00029363483,0.00030293752,0.00032566127,0.000009782674,0.7065277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547487,0.00035602035,0.00059970055,0.00029966023,0.00011073816,0.000013318122,0.0000028323318,0.000016582671,0.043852456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818796,0.000058811893,0.00042187038,0.00021558412,0.0005058154,0.00060997263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982365,0.0002760644,0.0001823845,0.00030462188,0.00021778238,0.0007826859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040635112,0.00013214939,0.0003223182,0.00021291757,0.00014171089,0.000010196407,0.00045309638,0.000080666294,0.00042736853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006369159,0.00011169867,0.00005303066,0.00037064927,0.00024457203,0.00020047894,0.000038865404,0.000053962816,0.0000075892644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009472242,0.0000451475,0.04028555,0.0002011446,0.0000793669,0.000048796228,0.0061213616,0.000018015851,0.0023690339,0.44787565,0.49021077,0.012650461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011237097,0.000046590972,0.00940724,0.00015637158,0.000019717785,4.769244e-7,0.00035860945,2.0292279e-7,0.0015840635,0.0008952638,0.9872636,0.00015550069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66583806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002776498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006972066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790921945","doi":"","title":"The Criminal statutes of Canada: with notes and a copious index","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Index (typography); Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019445782415580586,"score_gpt":0.2571724943953016,"score_spread":0.237726711979721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790921945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44931132,0.0006162759,0.0000033165575,0.009039149,0.0002173071,0.00026511317,0.00006689752,0.0000069511602,0.5404737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948474,0.0007715412,0.000072029805,0.00009887995,0.000078220175,0.000006600451,7.030545e-7,0.0000071997747,0.0041174125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989275,0.000039482475,0.00016795826,0.00013707903,0.00034641937,0.00038161443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987092,0.0003096091,0.00017827473,0.00029897268,0.00013593599,0.0003679918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031504955,0.000092563634,0.00016720076,0.000058186448,0.0013815388,0.000080566024,0.00042004674,0.000046590638,0.000020105528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046091597,0.00006855159,0.000020042324,0.000048616057,0.00095224526,0.00014098355,0.00002878015,0.00008564303,3.3170792e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019563621,0.00002276927,0.3407017,0.00021437339,0.0001043977,0.00021084174,0.020111822,0.000009482837,0.000017183242,0.5357799,0.040250298,0.06238158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013718207,0.00006221044,0.19955198,0.000070905,0.000038840175,0.0000031173208,0.0024252273,0.0000027197514,0.00003094139,0.00097270915,0.7965671,0.00013709917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99935496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7563168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097788645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052363668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791047618","doi":"","title":"Report of the Canadian Committee on Corrections: towards unity: criminal justice and corrections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.056761581302077806,"score_gpt":0.3178578366745517,"score_spread":0.2610962553724739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791047618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11842525,0.00006194158,0.0000016207223,0.006460316,0.0024059464,0.00027446626,0.00008245493,0.000012102451,0.8722759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699964,0.00026201562,0.000066294364,0.00039642636,0.0002571688,0.000013864261,0.0000033746692,0.000011705528,0.028992752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986062,0.00012036082,0.0002892333,0.00021774034,0.0003618033,0.00040463178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997975,0.0001525542,0.0002697875,0.00065075146,0.00026208127,0.000689862],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065975304,0.00012911315,0.0002112826,0.00028149082,0.0038076355,0.00011316426,0.0005592584,0.00013923422,0.00010196193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021922863,0.000118721844,0.0000785663,0.00017415508,0.00101978,0.00018656676,0.000040834053,0.0002615577,0.000005731315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006101323,0.00010107609,0.21091157,0.00035735482,0.0001159817,0.00048609998,0.033474322,0.000033028955,0.000012042841,0.52049243,0.16011184,0.07384323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075063435,0.000045015215,0.1797234,0.00010517838,0.0002385544,0.000021688644,0.003648464,0.000004134777,0.000017527573,0.0006957353,0.8152814,0.00014387262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85157114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036604577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004701564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791055735","doi":"","title":"A digest of the criminal law of Canada (crimes and punishments) founded by permission on Sir James Fitzjames Stephen's Digest of [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Permission; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.020375130130334224,"score_gpt":0.2635020390065998,"score_spread":0.24312690887626556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791055735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54517174,0.00024163614,7.4259674e-8,0.0019074646,0.00019794863,0.00023035749,0.00017573054,0.000003306761,0.45207176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912433,0.00040068288,0.000021559072,0.00016049124,0.000056379293,0.0000060799466,0.0000034734137,0.00001275113,0.008095264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819416,0.00011795465,0.0004046453,0.00024217236,0.0006486073,0.0003924736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810493,0.00026822364,0.0004980866,0.00056740537,0.00017047758,0.00039086814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486517,0.00017348649,0.0003910066,0.00008081458,0.00072286534,0.000041456497,0.0008889591,0.000113133174,0.000062074025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000513516,0.00014103256,0.00008708152,0.00007687807,0.0012742924,0.0002125101,0.00009321657,0.00013241805,3.0154192e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033317797,0.00027579846,0.15346277,0.0011805879,0.00020103763,0.000052019932,0.03266543,0.0000115787525,0.0028144638,0.68379414,0.10782924,0.017379778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047516168,0.0002756822,0.11046441,0.0007272824,0.00017300788,0.0000025094066,0.00886576,0.0000014933208,0.006123528,0.0014749519,0.87104553,0.00037070375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99639577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99781525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76321626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014901724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002511984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5751141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791056079","doi":"","title":"Tremeear's annotated Criminal Code, Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminal justice; Computer science; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Programming language; Sociology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04127604396841739,"score_gpt":0.2924260998876329,"score_spread":0.2511500559192155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791056079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12396423,0.00012988069,0.0000010193361,0.006218246,0.00071131054,0.00018971736,0.0001601234,0.00001952896,0.868606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546026,0.00036395495,0.00012440598,0.00045531715,0.00034463403,0.0000098636665,0.000008604725,0.000016841417,0.0440738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982199,0.00007306646,0.00027472313,0.00026091846,0.000511403,0.0006599556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812806,0.00009047295,0.00019356974,0.0005297716,0.00018466871,0.0008734333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003794027,0.00015060986,0.00024791062,0.00015957878,0.0015346779,0.0001249065,0.00088366534,0.00010016489,0.00038984744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060920086,0.00016432955,0.00006425301,0.00010271196,0.00045089851,0.00030133344,0.00003728755,0.00014375342,0.000018081335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006671278,0.00003759113,0.05324272,0.00012343866,0.00006888342,0.00081655267,0.00940854,0.000010485857,0.000045083234,0.22916415,0.6582681,0.04874772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011356233,0.000021027181,0.05233579,0.000040592255,0.000036780315,0.0000021830879,0.0009825118,0.0000030104518,0.000023320641,0.00039182004,0.94584894,0.00020044463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83063835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003788879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069646304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791079309","doi":"","title":"A guide to using the Criminal Code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Computer science; Computer security; Law; Political science; Programming language; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.05192455960075113,"score_gpt":0.3319171390283961,"score_spread":0.27999257942764494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791079309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15949394,0.00007677822,0.000010996881,0.007602362,0.0004644312,0.00023951587,0.00009732027,0.000004913088,0.83200973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97005695,0.000070612565,0.00064960786,0.0006514929,0.00027813093,0.0000063585107,7.86324e-7,0.000011586101,0.028274473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861836,0.00006104493,0.0002663447,0.00015967447,0.00043965352,0.0004549117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985021,0.00010915462,0.00017885918,0.0005073781,0.00017396866,0.0005285803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005515399,0.000097318545,0.00019126316,0.000097785676,0.0011765973,0.00005405115,0.0009354908,0.00005135391,0.000107901265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000830512,0.00008475422,0.000052006595,0.00008997283,0.00034295538,0.00012911606,0.00005321487,0.00008001916,0.000001947962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006797587,0.000026642849,0.024798105,0.00016225646,0.000074753836,0.00021223664,0.029745879,0.00016522133,0.0003538598,0.39851695,0.5208059,0.025070226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047190388,0.000015787351,0.009619685,0.00005849866,0.000036679965,0.0000018181097,0.0022609644,0.0000064263336,0.000078779594,0.00023173142,0.98753095,0.000111483525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030882313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007211675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791140533","doi":"","title":"A by-law to regulate the proceedings in the Municipal Council of the City of Toronto and the Committees thereof","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.03192229261658758,"score_gpt":0.2501108299370848,"score_spread":0.2181885373204972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791140533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4700983,0.0005236496,1.7877335e-7,0.0186734,0.00006216375,0.0005244704,0.000036101566,0.000003154613,0.5100786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934477,0.0005003866,0.000007781596,0.0008848133,0.000058651334,0.000032102667,1.14057606e-7,0.0000064350993,0.005061987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984408,0.00020189563,0.00029308925,0.00014007186,0.00062156055,0.00030258036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859697,0.00060535857,0.00015974176,0.000339633,0.00018746007,0.000110857836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027341212,0.000106840416,0.00021260545,0.000016072545,0.00038897278,0.000028480159,0.0010812233,0.000065021726,0.00006179139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005253712,0.000041477757,0.00007117269,0.00015040472,0.0017244642,0.00014367967,0.00007318819,0.00008778562,8.16328e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008777366,0.000017847704,0.008817673,0.000025801211,0.00002023874,6.3353957e-7,0.14540167,2.7751562e-7,0.00014450986,0.8233702,0.019684808,0.002428554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026994964,0.00003868898,0.020974118,0.00012383315,0.000032505835,0.0000010420177,0.010675304,9.328328e-7,0.00005905327,0.00481668,0.96292394,0.00008397836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99667233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9432391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024385526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062147406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63538605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791186218","doi":"","title":"Your guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: including a complete text of the Charter, a discussion of its meaning [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0457075182645472,"score_gpt":0.2910619004155625,"score_spread":0.24535438215101532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791186218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39551547,0.000447155,0.000015330828,0.04995155,0.0007202204,0.0014203775,0.0007372933,0.000014228293,0.5511784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355537,0.000084170315,0.000073984746,0.00021256316,0.00013233902,0.000011132544,8.5686827e-7,0.000010476935,0.0059191114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832815,0.0001508235,0.0004512852,0.00020325411,0.00043364172,0.0004328402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855334,0.00015446871,0.00024179244,0.0003411218,0.00019796808,0.00051132817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006951327,0.00013508002,0.00029977981,0.0002633458,0.000518759,0.000016111147,0.0006138063,0.000084754996,0.00011104424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003106017,0.00006517477,0.00008933006,0.00028727448,0.0005101608,0.0001538623,0.000074653064,0.00007928464,0.000004737742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009209275,0.000054358676,0.03707109,0.00034899483,0.00017662859,0.00002568645,0.20581049,0.0000083026025,0.012140443,0.61948293,0.08442584,0.04036314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021064677,0.00006532582,0.018185932,0.00076081796,0.00004777323,0.0000022647882,0.001614328,0.000005377201,0.00051400263,0.0017999546,0.97662824,0.00016531543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97640496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89220244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017385841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010516656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39899272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791190925","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada relating to criminal law and to procedure in criminal cases: passed in the 2nd, 3rd [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Dominion; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032928937333050495,"score_gpt":0.2863090079949846,"score_spread":0.25338007066193413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791190925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85884297,0.000048408423,1.6028687e-7,0.0068294685,0.00015107782,0.0006166372,0.000036997222,9.816335e-7,0.13347332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869543,0.00002437303,0.000057984274,0.00065940776,0.000046999605,0.000023492572,3.3165242e-7,0.0000067907094,0.0004851804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830407,0.0001862651,0.00043042068,0.00018559085,0.000536969,0.00035668744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862003,0.00030353057,0.00030985894,0.00046476774,0.000100171,0.00020163502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000949114,0.00011850515,0.0002590175,0.00008938465,0.0004038212,0.000026836224,0.0008678901,0.00006974042,0.000010888526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014302721,0.00007679377,0.000050274248,0.00020020932,0.00037407823,0.00011299041,0.000091343965,0.00015397395,1.3846547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033390836,0.00012848014,0.25988796,0.0010854342,0.000036186477,0.0001064087,0.27453724,0.0001927701,0.00088905304,0.4447933,0.012374248,0.005635019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045754536,0.00019441877,0.75990176,0.0014464033,0.000107471584,0.00001035228,0.057429127,0.000006328656,0.0010614526,0.0009284617,0.1781671,0.00028957764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50001377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002061951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026651262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47278196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791192207","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal law, international and transnational aspects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.028662836394348135,"score_gpt":0.291074258910035,"score_spread":0.2624114225156869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791192207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044275407,0.000063646534,0.0000015039236,0.032810517,0.0006012235,0.000134356,0.00011639806,0.0000105795525,0.92198634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896616,0.00018508206,0.00021192484,0.0005447996,0.00033688586,0.000008463221,0.00001177459,0.000010058941,0.009029422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987871,0.0000353126,0.00018246884,0.00021876693,0.0003565769,0.0004197498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850273,0.0000627718,0.000087006076,0.0002224658,0.00014241989,0.0009825923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003455635,0.00010916649,0.00014162948,0.00029867442,0.0012927986,0.00020231357,0.00058890705,0.00010505769,0.00055928016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019024515,0.00012575932,0.000050395498,0.00004623033,0.0005233061,0.00045607265,0.000018762685,0.000112227644,0.000010830317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044569338,0.00000388441,0.004198351,0.000008296636,0.000011141674,0.000047589176,0.00239518,4.977732e-7,0.0000035090263,0.98755354,0.0023597663,0.0034137813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012193816,0.00001560021,0.06428175,0.000019432071,0.00002438627,0.0000055606047,0.0006603316,0.000004025393,0.0000069359053,0.010897798,0.9238113,0.00015094562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033134752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002235622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791235451","doi":"","title":"Canada : La Cour supérieure du Québec précise que les demandeurs d'un recours collectif peuvent obtenir l'accès à la totalité des communications interceptées lors de l'enquête publique (Jacques/Pétroles Irving)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03328801142566479,"score_gpt":0.2844342081318829,"score_spread":0.2511461967062181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791235451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73678267,0.05572083,0.00021713386,0.18939672,0.0013609553,0.0009673805,0.00014625063,0.00015152851,0.01525651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696402,0.02123287,0.0008190131,0.00042859424,0.0004131496,0.00032762764,0.000018574634,0.000040623534,0.007079345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462605,0.0024814678,0.000811453,0.00063263084,0.0004875635,0.00096084696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937404,0.0035495094,0.00051205524,0.00073076924,0.0007333377,0.0007339221],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016722893,0.00050562265,0.0006665422,0.00011938215,0.0018710399,0.00080653804,0.0021349385,0.0003916394,0.0016961294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023932208,0.0005110488,0.00027550448,0.0007241446,0.0041844524,0.0011596282,0.00044905965,0.0007968853,0.000050685016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057720965,0.0007113487,0.2988921,0.0013921593,0.00041988707,0.00014415916,0.085598454,0.00017643966,0.00015067676,0.06926708,0.23661123,0.30657873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027754073,0.00016225717,0.033294223,0.0023693787,0.00028771922,0.00019679204,0.04892101,0.001293442,0.00007306886,0.0030506975,0.9092467,0.0008271616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001270645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012155213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791290139","doi":"","title":"First principles: recodifying the general part of the Criminal Code of Canada: report of the Sub-Committee on the Recodification [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Law; Computer science; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.08850588311043471,"score_gpt":0.28603463486335984,"score_spread":0.1975287517529251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791290139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6228502,0.00009287401,9.331656e-7,0.03476681,0.00081870425,0.00058473024,0.00011207223,0.0000039745523,0.34076974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989399,0.00030460238,0.000027540085,0.00028061707,0.00020456681,0.000026316535,0.0000015618551,0.000011673371,0.009744088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978032,0.00026401426,0.0006350129,0.000209908,0.00072950637,0.00035833713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964807,0.0004532697,0.0011683953,0.0015004472,0.00025755333,0.0001396567],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017826781,0.00013807953,0.00025413086,0.000045938265,0.0017772248,0.000032654385,0.0018739603,0.00008702869,0.000049149778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021641762,0.00007331353,0.00015802101,0.00014989445,0.0011318319,0.00009141412,0.000090891364,0.00021641144,6.0892614e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008797747,0.00008645067,0.13494205,0.00031897178,0.00014628418,0.000029377343,0.026174394,0.00048822784,0.00024644454,0.65390223,0.17851709,0.0050605116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006248371,0.000020157026,0.20548883,0.0002298928,0.00007796735,0.0000048621555,0.001676572,0.000021214295,0.0011626985,0.0006742087,0.790474,0.000107123895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.653228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023815935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041095237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791398884","doi":"","title":"Canada. Court Martial Appeal Board","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01939655142603287,"score_gpt":0.26431768439627884,"score_spread":0.24492113297024598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791398884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09766839,0.0005033857,0.0000020412642,0.04737329,0.0021138992,0.0002927272,0.00020935011,0.00003069107,0.8518062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99008733,0.0034243632,0.00014274461,0.00037418422,0.00062224496,0.000011550999,0.000006247504,0.000013930275,0.0053174244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821895,0.00006441317,0.00025472746,0.00025108113,0.00053120154,0.00067963713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826175,0.000064655236,0.00018439701,0.00051545294,0.0001502644,0.0008235088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036815714,0.00015177694,0.00023574026,0.00049203984,0.0017269803,0.00013823259,0.0009195841,0.00012587156,0.00024013555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000302366,0.00016103817,0.00011972232,0.00046191487,0.0011874379,0.00029574995,0.000045002813,0.00011975605,0.000010559305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002490292,0.000016438724,0.18236877,0.000031631847,0.000044410855,0.0001061908,0.0011980217,9.543395e-7,0.000012563439,0.11804423,0.69166714,0.006484765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089250825,0.000019783696,0.11271839,0.000025613885,0.000026669746,7.4821344e-7,0.0007303044,6.772745e-7,0.000011072621,0.0004391865,0.8857556,0.00018270849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8924189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012341951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039278716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791535764","doi":"","title":"British Columbia. Criminal Records Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal record; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030514366328622974,"score_gpt":0.291660578771269,"score_spread":0.261146212442646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791535764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05523599,0.01834823,7.726643e-7,0.010165186,0.001415815,0.00051026203,0.00013180959,0.000047130565,0.9141448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25618595,0.7131779,0.0005393046,0.0013539565,0.00069983513,0.000052813,0.000016832792,0.000027779777,0.027945586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982236,0.00010324859,0.00034807768,0.00030728808,0.00041584764,0.00060192135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813706,0.00006862638,0.00025896603,0.00060076604,0.00024356255,0.0006910297],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007638375,0.00011455436,0.0003380394,0.0002935891,0.0016236418,0.0004921229,0.0010253614,0.00013429447,0.0029408722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095453014,0.0001801199,0.00023132566,0.0006815009,0.001527013,0.00047797957,0.000049254475,0.00013359726,0.00002510067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002680326,0.000017160153,0.09034404,0.00035120847,0.000019456007,0.00007702766,0.00043949566,1.2095401e-8,0.0000010511993,0.003042198,0.8518871,0.053818587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006378105,0.000036649133,0.116426796,0.00095729704,0.00009033905,0.0000058368037,0.00047004243,6.1492116e-8,4.819326e-7,0.000605483,0.8811403,0.00020293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99643594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88619924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005223495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069526816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791675951","doi":"","title":"Statutes of British Columbia : compiled for use of justices of the peace.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Statute of limitations; History","score_opus":0.040936044243725295,"score_gpt":0.2618984943051306,"score_spread":0.22096245006140533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791675951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92343146,0.00035526376,0.000016311882,0.0008320917,0.0003990571,0.00068853935,0.0021580737,0.000009095804,0.07211009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978457,0.0008028555,0.0005883885,0.000050456154,0.00006883525,0.000012957595,0.000002229988,0.000010263055,0.020007012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878937,0.00008827573,0.00039422585,0.00014285545,0.00030091617,0.00028432944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998224,0.0007293453,0.00032138586,0.00022739205,0.0003138104,0.00018403694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036058048,0.00006238336,0.00028142004,0.0000622288,0.0001265303,0.000022152617,0.0003881908,0.000074289725,0.00019219494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006944027,0.000063631225,0.00012309165,0.00016744,0.00076218025,0.00019542305,0.000028122357,0.000037084916,5.608653e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011433165,0.00015802488,0.31575406,0.001187882,0.00015276851,0.000010027383,0.00956674,0.000008527576,0.0015600458,0.07011756,0.4934053,0.107964724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026806613,0.000086934546,0.11272752,0.00046771564,0.00009909051,6.7681873e-7,0.0009440125,0.0000017632076,0.00015119015,0.0010354491,0.8840953,0.00012225512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005201379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010795938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28082848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791784496","doi":"10.29173/alr1367","title":"Searching for Truth but Missing the Point","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Perception; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Process (computing); Criminal trial; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11667165081332377,"score_gpt":0.37442881498338926,"score_spread":0.2577571641700655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791784496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009935319,0.16654898,0.00013144602,0.31347725,0.00039386994,0.0013148073,0.0000022350225,0.000041816387,0.51709604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464262,0.10554239,0.00081721984,0.026892895,0.00084089115,0.00015285073,0.0000037074667,0.0000346768,0.019289203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892277,0.0002090305,0.0001864667,0.00016849123,0.00021332958,0.00029991905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766153,0.001916413,0.00006141952,0.00022153098,0.00004502773,0.00009409292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011176008,0.00007994191,0.00017528207,0.0000057730535,0.00097536395,0.000106100684,0.0003253991,0.000026881198,0.0006493445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014245036,0.00005133183,0.00014222774,0.000113693524,0.00019921323,0.00019371913,0.000030396364,0.000090418675,0.00019598106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001328566,0.00001277857,0.0000072021503,0.0005023538,0.0000069203693,9.2664317e-7,0.0019126546,1.4055932e-7,0.0000050634317,0.91748154,0.010456855,0.06961222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035916604,0.000013215357,0.0000052408877,0.0014691375,0.000052420113,0.000003279459,0.00013051971,0.000031915217,0.000009377277,0.004086865,0.99407965,0.0000824775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019295251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01150871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030282039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022412616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98723537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791820295","doi":"","title":"The prerogative writs in Canadian criminal law and procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.027291115713064328,"score_gpt":0.2964880012928698,"score_spread":0.2691968855798055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791820295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11620529,0.00039783595,6.021558e-8,0.009670354,0.00018568723,0.00033069617,0.000033126933,0.000006839823,0.87317014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019957,0.00079832296,0.000039274022,0.00046830834,0.00015391652,0.000026470801,0.0000015651314,0.000010102906,0.00830247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985446,0.000076594224,0.00019845778,0.00022326696,0.00023373126,0.0007233922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983861,0.00013953312,0.00010514585,0.0003149965,0.00009611519,0.0009581409],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006775214,0.000119869066,0.00016152527,0.0001529133,0.0024099317,0.00022843796,0.00059957773,0.000114732145,0.000034566696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068687095,0.00010556935,0.00003321948,0.00008349869,0.0010783353,0.0003502362,0.00003131958,0.00016828734,0.000008752495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110149485,0.0000046229,0.030972444,0.000031289812,0.000007924826,0.00006152481,0.01287547,4.6127704e-7,0.0000016978248,0.945994,0.004249431,0.0057900767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009441744,0.000024913554,0.10194486,0.0000758573,0.000016417915,0.0000024770163,0.002729341,0.0000024950568,0.000006527561,0.0041951607,0.8907695,0.00013804142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94179887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027512683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030712679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791854956","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code and other selected statutes of Canada: with the amendments passed up to the end of the session of Parliament, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Statute; Session (web analytics); Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Statute of limitations; Business; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02499127191965161,"score_gpt":0.2727245933309915,"score_spread":0.2477333214113399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791854956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90166533,0.00020396237,0.000002628508,0.015928157,0.00024216725,0.00065109733,0.00025986944,0.0000030772835,0.081043735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445766,0.00014272965,0.000021767431,0.00028278492,0.00004703008,0.000016870958,5.606453e-7,0.000009241888,0.0050213384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852467,0.00017450952,0.00025151682,0.0001427344,0.00056455645,0.00034201687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983581,0.00033730213,0.0004115393,0.0005170775,0.0001998587,0.00017612471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060573604,0.00011360263,0.00019162112,0.000034365352,0.0011887773,0.000043578297,0.000899801,0.000040064722,0.000028716737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030241697,0.0000512909,0.00003465943,0.00013987323,0.0010357802,0.000073260446,0.00006317452,0.00010501088,1.8057706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000800968,0.000099351266,0.27178478,0.00038938824,0.0005233009,0.000017152457,0.14229216,0.00007714619,0.002797771,0.23106064,0.3177212,0.032436147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019139849,0.000086710344,0.14542538,0.00015320581,0.00009965004,0.0000010041398,0.010568366,0.0000037180866,0.0013641516,0.00022525153,0.8417704,0.000110780806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5240492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000972188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031815562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9143234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791882989","doi":"","title":"Pocket dictionary of Canadian law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027378203416501937,"score_gpt":0.2566357099408883,"score_spread":0.22925750652438637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791882989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030464407,0.00024368647,0.0000015958841,0.008266885,0.00041229578,0.00018284463,0.00024556447,0.000018439889,0.9601643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971502,0.00096161914,0.00014145747,0.00073823007,0.00026752002,0.000011142556,0.000005141881,0.000015512602,0.026357388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850285,0.000086147935,0.0002991594,0.00020737998,0.0003341788,0.00057026645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981897,0.00016595481,0.00009589465,0.00025945168,0.0001498679,0.0011391136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003777899,0.00011836564,0.00021255737,0.00077575154,0.00033868747,0.000013739404,0.00037639734,0.00013704144,0.0013477006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018369664,0.00010341288,0.00008838704,0.0004662869,0.00054933695,0.0002552876,0.000015248488,0.00006949058,0.00004805312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008529391,0.00000882959,0.006060858,0.00001752023,0.000016679258,0.000041616473,0.001549772,4.5042952e-7,0.000071143586,0.9298563,0.053501952,0.0088663185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009395416,0.000033632597,0.008264174,0.00007817885,0.00001860614,0.000002462003,0.00035756515,1.3430437e-7,0.000073120376,0.0037806726,0.98715454,0.00014294029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99907947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003156058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027367852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791987152","doi":"","title":"Statutes of the province of Manitoba : passed in the session held in the ...","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Statute; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.022801570599286558,"score_gpt":0.261809003778329,"score_spread":0.23900743317904244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791987152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70453185,0.00016511891,0.0000016654895,0.015397565,0.00015424743,0.0006212516,0.00004369717,0.0000035694027,0.27908105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981228,0.00027644497,0.000020050666,0.0003105596,0.0000587512,0.000017742268,4.331375e-7,0.0000045729903,0.0011886514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984812,0.0003909968,0.0002918944,0.00012433773,0.00042991954,0.0002816496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987624,0.00064903626,0.00015012371,0.00032473536,0.00005193585,0.00006171822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001159063,0.000080161175,0.00014858699,0.00011089127,0.00012052324,0.000012522333,0.0008461078,0.00006374533,0.000027021453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003935803,0.00003588739,0.00005659652,0.0003254147,0.00039320902,0.00013627908,0.000026113032,0.00010308358,0.0000017237782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007161136,0.00014709789,0.33541828,0.00019048265,0.000014590197,0.00006397552,0.053012874,0.00000606525,0.0006757591,0.51711226,0.03255278,0.060734242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021135708,0.000059755654,0.39012858,0.0004098116,0.000016749844,0.0000011049956,0.013884654,7.124837e-7,0.0002668054,0.0054357755,0.5894667,0.000117964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7751098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5569139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000876044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011862129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22638774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792076423","doi":"","title":"Rethinking criminal law theory: new Canadian perspectives in the philosophy of domestic, transnational, and international criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Public law; Comparative law; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06883193463250704,"score_gpt":0.32392304830760876,"score_spread":0.25509111367510173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792076423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068098895,0.00039945362,0.00000479864,0.03996017,0.00027647978,0.0002583194,0.00007414647,0.0000070954993,0.89092064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970832,0.00025368587,0.00031150138,0.0008148095,0.00034310747,0.000008710126,0.000006393536,0.000011274714,0.0011673094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844706,0.00016491931,0.00028353912,0.00026298244,0.00045199756,0.00038952436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859613,0.00031725547,0.00015773243,0.00030402042,0.0001635008,0.00046133695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011031356,0.0001473535,0.00021681968,0.00031585235,0.0009441569,0.000192239,0.000967087,0.000119588534,0.0002003265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038039568,0.0001364939,0.00007511581,0.00009043947,0.0014521993,0.000582952,0.000023407294,0.00022492696,0.0000015774687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021543134,0.00001054636,0.0006224221,0.00002079326,0.000013879537,0.000045430304,0.05784397,0.0000014816166,0.0000030558745,0.9401268,0.00025105727,0.0010390676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037439304,0.00007097576,0.0327145,0.00013551995,0.00011564962,0.00002090438,0.02097137,0.0000047005915,0.000008473247,0.63685083,0.30845088,0.0002818301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99919546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92898434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022751855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019314673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7261787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792150346","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal code offences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Criminology; Code (set theory); Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04939344378777781,"score_gpt":0.31130212759855236,"score_spread":0.26190868381077453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792150346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073233604,0.00018672124,0.0000011096822,0.010892499,0.00079201156,0.000219791,0.00014913901,0.00002101607,0.9145041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95586234,0.00071696023,0.00023853424,0.00053329,0.0005067443,0.000014750388,0.000006398758,0.000016908409,0.04210407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980061,0.00007983051,0.00027766952,0.0003061283,0.00042710622,0.0009031859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714607,0.000092284215,0.0001767354,0.0005978282,0.00016023699,0.0018268541],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063417887,0.00016731497,0.000261296,0.00043308677,0.0024240036,0.00023783298,0.0012764111,0.00016685996,0.0007478315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069934217,0.00018148046,0.00009997123,0.000114937524,0.0007171667,0.00048572983,0.00003439679,0.00016621209,0.00011116129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023466324,0.000022591295,0.1109057,0.000091790826,0.000045590357,0.00044001106,0.01671013,0.000003810426,0.000016836364,0.66560984,0.15516545,0.0509648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007655003,0.000029268082,0.05251823,0.000058378115,0.000039500705,0.000002923198,0.001535838,0.0000021115618,0.00001341565,0.0019353101,0.9435613,0.00022716941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88262874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045668567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058716387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792341683","doi":"","title":"A treatise on the criminal law of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03993453976252985,"score_gpt":0.2771795110867957,"score_spread":0.23724497132426586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792341683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10511738,0.000053195476,1.9785578e-7,0.008631886,0.00023955431,0.00015996421,0.000062658546,0.0000043136934,0.88573086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773619,0.00011719842,0.00002885881,0.0006086566,0.0001569141,0.0000098923465,0.0000011177019,0.000008091609,0.021707343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987749,0.000073922114,0.00020119191,0.00014829572,0.00042164495,0.0003800779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860764,0.00023216211,0.00017793907,0.000513602,0.00009495484,0.0003736776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037571305,0.00010199247,0.00018395082,0.00006380773,0.0012116112,0.000047858226,0.000735768,0.000056825585,0.00029646407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000474281,0.000081162696,0.000059116574,0.000054266016,0.0006228253,0.0001164758,0.000023056089,0.00009721768,0.0000047849735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012610191,0.000007254886,0.0014678676,0.000016496255,0.000010091348,0.000032506563,0.0024317906,0.000001185834,0.0000045281854,0.9518794,0.04125579,0.0028804718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007079765,0.000040186653,0.01648396,0.000069303576,0.000033572855,8.289728e-7,0.0012689821,0.0000010534241,0.000090186884,0.0020213393,0.9798073,0.00011244268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99980533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94985807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019144647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033694047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93188566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792538670","doi":"","title":"Supplement to the Criminal Code and the Canada Evidence Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.048854105201100145,"score_gpt":0.3100154661500383,"score_spread":0.26116136094893816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792538670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10520093,0.00095575256,0.00000595535,0.3917163,0.0011186333,0.0011792015,0.00019066728,0.000012583663,0.49961996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98527855,0.0010365114,0.00007453144,0.0022626433,0.00035149942,0.000040022944,0.0000010520454,0.000008093027,0.010947073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842113,0.00015052286,0.00021641585,0.0002138611,0.0005136573,0.00048440995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998143,0.00049946987,0.00012791032,0.00059756445,0.00010126663,0.0005307868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012743272,0.000119257194,0.00018258567,0.000054829718,0.0023345684,0.00020818724,0.0011745711,0.000039696304,0.00017023325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014401121,0.000076633136,0.000044314413,0.00006929885,0.00068318116,0.00020139103,0.00010092775,0.00012642816,0.0000071592967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011238675,0.0000061879377,0.017049437,0.000049983613,0.00003394316,0.000062176914,0.023166751,0.000008250311,0.000004020747,0.38074613,0.5552788,0.023481932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011428609,0.000018879755,0.036464915,0.00006524216,0.000049852864,0.0000022025931,0.0022649348,0.0000028813893,0.0000078645935,0.00040027557,0.9604986,0.00011012168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88007766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022983138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035248632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792641917","doi":"","title":"Statutes of Québec.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02324458454230403,"score_gpt":0.26495313608822363,"score_spread":0.2417085515459196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792641917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08631449,0.000380935,0.000007726889,0.006912053,0.00021266859,0.0001400551,0.00007210401,0.000017831626,0.90594214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949795,0.0010583854,0.00019441116,0.00013636966,0.00014267658,0.0000064901897,9.2389485e-7,0.000009646248,0.048656095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896604,0.000056538916,0.00023402194,0.00013865785,0.00026311536,0.00034163095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989703,0.00024515874,0.00009606182,0.00018884033,0.00011037868,0.00038920995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002945037,0.0000788196,0.00017217564,0.00020277574,0.00012502936,0.000008048277,0.0002840896,0.00006696047,0.0007930115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037739176,0.00006197542,0.0000640536,0.0001623013,0.0004052805,0.00017388373,0.000014766728,0.000036676614,0.000034859553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028710994,0.000027645654,0.058121372,0.000063236774,0.000031961175,0.00002650529,0.009317652,5.787826e-7,0.00042558627,0.70079166,0.123622954,0.107542135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008124475,0.000031453994,0.009674138,0.000064789136,0.000013136384,4.0191048e-7,0.00040510215,6.98477e-8,0.00015345434,0.001899085,0.9875817,0.00009546161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98650545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99815726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014235666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024986346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86829203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792702472","doi":"","title":"Agreement between Province of Manitoba and the Manitoba Association of Crown Attorneys","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Association (psychology); Archaeology; History; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.028680706019230298,"score_gpt":0.265915980947636,"score_spread":0.23723527492840574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792702472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51422036,0.00017786816,0.0000022959844,0.0039510457,0.00021268778,0.00047343323,0.00008298174,0.000005537607,0.48087382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931935,0.00051772845,0.00007530673,0.00004912174,0.00025497423,0.000008844677,0.000002408907,0.0000066029756,0.005891503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862903,0.00013773543,0.00033960489,0.00015358813,0.00045331515,0.0002867425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839973,0.00029912623,0.00059825944,0.0003421589,0.00016988431,0.00019081146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013229907,0.000096448995,0.00029176025,0.00009528549,0.0005386332,0.000052210155,0.00053629914,0.000099195386,0.000028650518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007027518,0.00008107768,0.00007275657,0.000054167704,0.00066063757,0.00020677446,0.00005801019,0.00009044124,0.000003953018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004430822,0.000017304354,0.82573164,0.00014173635,0.00008412911,0.000007062433,0.004120464,7.0276633e-7,0.00001797904,0.13773881,0.011081766,0.021014104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038867106,0.000044371278,0.5906713,0.00009609147,0.00011331217,2.0719575e-7,0.0016101735,9.521341e-7,0.00009669419,0.0021871175,0.40467045,0.0001206601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92791796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47897318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021757922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007031054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41427857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792716262","doi":"","title":"The Canada statute citator; a complete annotating service for R.S.C. 1952 and the Criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Service (business); Political science; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04900938342915353,"score_gpt":0.2959298449750608,"score_spread":0.24692046154590727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792716262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21468638,0.0013053743,0.000024811017,0.12820292,0.0015334112,0.0018533601,0.0012244818,0.000027268119,0.651142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98933583,0.00063265406,0.00030786282,0.0023944613,0.0003951749,0.000085455344,0.0000073324713,0.000020125159,0.0068211113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985184,0.000114195565,0.00026041982,0.00019838508,0.00034361897,0.00056497904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975627,0.0011687699,0.00023916946,0.00040266322,0.00024004202,0.0003866706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010614069,0.00012742696,0.00020734106,0.000039475224,0.004925641,0.00028072626,0.0008161166,0.000046589794,0.000010411594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010390017,0.00008926738,0.0000483113,0.000067596426,0.00083059113,0.00017324716,0.00005304026,0.0001213054,0.0000011841981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001701184,0.000004231499,0.0025757642,0.00012832068,0.000054001965,0.000024527188,0.017318081,0.0000054649017,0.000005372614,0.8927733,0.065187834,0.021753022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041208504,0.000015251511,0.0098895095,0.000038580005,0.000056995814,0.0000019464055,0.0053346036,0.00007082144,0.0000016954012,0.0025681881,0.981479,0.00013135021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014264477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032693015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792742115","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code of Canada as in force on January 1st, 1901: with the reported cases and appendices containing, the Canada Evidence [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.041906672062771724,"score_gpt":0.29158636369918006,"score_spread":0.24967969163640835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792742115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67447174,0.0009720284,1.4469114e-7,0.02451601,0.00020212121,0.0004903515,0.000052348954,0.0000038297467,0.29929143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913225,0.0007077381,0.0000048753845,0.00077565765,0.00008762652,0.000027742144,0.0000011925326,0.000009473997,0.007063169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794126,0.00018376314,0.00034031758,0.00025136527,0.00074013905,0.0005431825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961558,0.0022619662,0.00047678713,0.0006487655,0.00013927076,0.00031742573],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012082017,0.00016381138,0.00023977742,0.000052236646,0.0023432698,0.00011917636,0.0009936114,0.000050586226,0.000021025711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021587599,0.000090543304,0.000029564195,0.000107356325,0.0011229197,0.00019032421,0.000052022788,0.00022418937,2.7542998e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014966892,0.000041553405,0.32579216,0.00031717855,0.00030162575,0.005910251,0.047459986,0.0001419133,0.000024629424,0.2800792,0.30172727,0.036707576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015136546,0.00018392966,0.18183084,0.0003862861,0.00008561027,0.000050187202,0.026165867,0.0000068138056,0.000034265777,0.0002560106,0.7906319,0.00021693663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48890463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003457199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015303171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792761314","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms = la charte canadienne des droits et libertes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.01364356158585045,"score_gpt":0.24149461988505658,"score_spread":0.22785105829920613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792761314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34888354,0.00045007013,0.0000012495714,0.010034555,0.00023689122,0.0002523519,0.00015055218,0.000013481714,0.63997734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97741383,0.0008363761,0.000042789117,0.00019598311,0.00011783667,0.000016150834,0.0000018697393,0.000013768822,0.021361401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983503,0.00016732317,0.00027019222,0.0002192384,0.00022333676,0.0007696014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997668,0.00052270776,0.00010186658,0.00025388872,0.00015664296,0.0012968566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008817964,0.00014620699,0.00021605952,0.0002674319,0.00089429336,0.00006371402,0.00038278234,0.00013010313,0.00012086816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027778355,0.00009805799,0.000056903635,0.00019281369,0.0015470224,0.000260789,0.000018553226,0.00009284301,0.000011039318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104109695,0.0000065477884,0.008319656,0.00002060137,0.000034464712,0.00004094002,0.015503497,1.2154574e-7,0.000056111643,0.93635863,0.012766526,0.026882512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012779697,0.00003904125,0.029344482,0.000113828406,0.000021874655,0.000005003022,0.00027745485,5.483056e-7,0.000030928953,0.02963858,0.9402441,0.00015636515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027171307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019250722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68782717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792833204","doi":"","title":"The Criminal code and other selected statutes of Canada: with the amendments passed up to the end of the session of Parliament, [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Statute; Session (web analytics); Law; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminal code; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.02499127191965161,"score_gpt":0.2727245933309915,"score_spread":0.2477333214113399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792833204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90166533,0.00020396237,0.000002628508,0.015928157,0.00024216725,0.00065109733,0.00025986944,0.0000030772835,0.081043735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445766,0.00014272965,0.000021767431,0.00028278492,0.00004703008,0.000016870958,5.606453e-7,0.000009241888,0.0050213384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852467,0.00017450952,0.00025151682,0.0001427344,0.00056455645,0.00034201687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983581,0.00033730213,0.0004115393,0.0005170775,0.0001998587,0.00017612471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060573604,0.00011360263,0.00019162112,0.000034365352,0.0011887773,0.000043578297,0.000899801,0.000040064722,0.000028716737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030241697,0.0000512909,0.00003465943,0.00013987323,0.0010357802,0.000073260446,0.00006317452,0.00010501088,1.8057706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000800968,0.000099351266,0.27178478,0.00038938824,0.0005233009,0.000017152457,0.14229216,0.00007714619,0.002797771,0.23106064,0.3177212,0.032436147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019139849,0.000086710344,0.14542538,0.00015320581,0.00009965004,0.0000010041398,0.010568366,0.0000037180866,0.0013641516,0.00022525153,0.8417704,0.000110780806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99970543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5240492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000972188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031815562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9143234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792932786","doi":"","title":"British Columbia annual criminal practice 2013","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.017151396963118206,"score_gpt":0.2668256818071106,"score_spread":0.24967428484399237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792932786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06545259,0.00039717453,0.000008814033,0.010353938,0.00067404984,0.00029919075,0.00021183402,0.00004958556,0.9225528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68167764,0.0053473604,0.0011239072,0.0016095908,0.001185368,0.0000410864,0.000006233119,0.000039452963,0.30896938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998082,0.00017748418,0.0003037321,0.00029696967,0.00048632082,0.0006535166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796706,0.00048122698,0.00013854897,0.00023934392,0.00035219052,0.0008215977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000678015,0.000099577235,0.0002090056,0.00011602403,0.00039606687,0.00015979835,0.00042026708,0.00014033979,0.0037245213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014738382,0.00012941584,0.000081608305,0.00022388576,0.0004792291,0.0008510576,0.00003094385,0.00010289471,0.00011903362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011358415,0.000024121196,0.004501013,0.000019469328,0.000015152542,0.00018044395,0.0029107057,1.2474145e-7,0.0000109069815,0.014398796,0.9229516,0.054976325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014369132,0.000056922116,0.01208712,0.00010436107,0.000055025444,0.000022814475,0.0026999381,9.1935604e-8,0.0000021302735,0.00086516305,0.98375666,0.0002060727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99962765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.616225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022711257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001613566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792952382","doi":"","title":"Canada. Exchequer Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exchequer; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0157652570926837,"score_gpt":0.23879631468319712,"score_spread":0.22303105759051342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792952382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06410204,0.0010771793,0.000008969816,0.08236013,0.0013216778,0.00029626148,0.00035459475,0.000048943006,0.8504302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768147,0.009696594,0.00015271107,0.00069658196,0.00034239402,0.000014406878,0.0000031847756,0.000014879451,0.012264565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839866,0.0000780101,0.00024210055,0.00022081503,0.00045084974,0.0006095361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985894,0.00018138949,0.00008346028,0.00024986942,0.00016683392,0.00072904077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003275203,0.0001310549,0.00018631265,0.00069794734,0.00033077074,0.000021053724,0.00041221987,0.00010670241,0.00072834356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024979218,0.00010294713,0.00009179895,0.001385859,0.0007208164,0.00020319101,0.00001776798,0.00005676007,0.00001759399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009224258,0.000009217084,0.042869456,0.000013991847,0.00002538408,0.000036592064,0.0008098031,1.1930048e-7,0.000062936735,0.11328519,0.8322337,0.0106443595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008513573,0.000017250291,0.019574776,0.000044848995,0.000017336019,8.9474815e-7,0.0007630608,4.5836728e-8,0.00003816051,0.0006500076,0.97863334,0.00017512329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91271263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018309972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7974851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792958058","doi":"","title":"The Criminal law consolidation and amendment acts of 1869, 32-33 Vict. for the Dominion of Canada. Vol. I: as amended and in force on [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Law; Political science; Consolidation (business); Criminal law; Amendment; Business","score_opus":0.028167435135798117,"score_gpt":0.2954097752682783,"score_spread":0.26724234013248016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792958058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5701683,0.00038794917,0.0000036158788,0.011885495,0.0005012589,0.0011223578,0.00014339104,0.0000037349582,0.41578385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658954,0.00084595743,0.000034287612,0.00020892307,0.00006695497,0.00002837115,0.0000019492866,0.000006000166,0.0022180064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897975,0.000058940182,0.0002591146,0.00014714076,0.0002710377,0.00028404142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860024,0.0005866846,0.0002545239,0.00024693616,0.00012791238,0.00018370368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006956081,0.00009298224,0.00018067927,0.000057079666,0.0008275224,0.000050337687,0.00028674354,0.000054126584,0.000008880132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006251788,0.000068560774,0.000026396354,0.00003822209,0.0006839479,0.00011983491,0.000026956635,0.00006830863,1.38227e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022830791,0.000012936485,0.00088999583,0.00008629554,0.00002304802,0.000004143237,0.0057701436,0.000006088694,0.00012899195,0.97989327,0.0042439364,0.008712828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052366307,0.00016936124,0.0134499585,0.00015413998,0.000065838416,0.0000013257097,0.0067320215,0.0000229514,0.0014057074,0.0061429157,0.971181,0.00015116064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98307425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97375035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012436578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013486345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6364717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792985396","doi":"","title":"A century of criminal justice: perspectives on the development of Canadian law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.055322879923309275,"score_gpt":0.30540764920909336,"score_spread":0.2500847692857841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792985396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17873147,0.00019303299,6.807766e-7,0.0024238364,0.00025902392,0.00023193094,0.000057927886,0.000004838007,0.81809723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962547,0.0004986698,0.0004739216,0.00016774959,0.00014517315,0.00001124232,0.0000019956317,0.00001141381,0.0024351347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984477,0.00008261791,0.00033765647,0.00021351106,0.00043119714,0.00048730578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825823,0.00017460965,0.0002668774,0.00047885103,0.00023552788,0.0005859214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006777559,0.00013699263,0.00024410494,0.00041986333,0.0014137245,0.00004641444,0.0008757921,0.00010168322,0.0002633001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058769324,0.00011732463,0.00008442846,0.00016155583,0.0009783647,0.00015161745,0.000032175078,0.0001403614,0.0000098471155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014896888,0.000017171578,0.00052247336,0.00006960108,0.00002243049,0.000012587087,0.07198924,9.976011e-7,0.00002233403,0.92201596,0.002244202,0.0030681195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008809664,0.000045053926,0.01362629,0.00015337754,0.00009908738,7.8402184e-7,0.059600733,5.307498e-7,0.00020563671,0.00051404577,0.92550164,0.000164706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99960613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92325747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000297748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004238426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793118442","doi":"","title":"Criminal law and the Canadian criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04248858460950564,"score_gpt":0.2998926238185834,"score_spread":0.25740403920907773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793118442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030903088,0.00031373484,8.3809925e-7,0.016393123,0.00042798423,0.00031027364,0.000086712585,0.000013687916,0.95155054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853317,0.0005753988,0.0001388799,0.0021760755,0.0004166253,0.00002104885,0.000003591303,0.000016459691,0.011320217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981608,0.00014179654,0.0002623151,0.0002808302,0.00039905528,0.00075525034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763155,0.00018704381,0.00015843075,0.0005828167,0.00014864761,0.0012914863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903587,0.00017024002,0.00027989838,0.00019384833,0.004778376,0.00041912834,0.0009481826,0.00015248379,0.00019933825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005863316,0.00014427702,0.00008891881,0.000067905465,0.0032546239,0.0003625406,0.000051589996,0.00022537053,0.000029322395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024085488,0.0000031466273,0.0019140568,0.000024176601,0.000011481662,0.000057994846,0.008050532,3.5900084e-7,8.280079e-7,0.9790512,0.00751149,0.0033506902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031088895,0.00002359209,0.018370785,0.000046179655,0.00012320372,0.000009438491,0.0020988367,0.00000425584,0.000005681095,0.006377471,0.97242826,0.00020142198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99960274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025518372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002755513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793206150","doi":"","title":"Criminal law and the Canadian criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04248858460950564,"score_gpt":0.2998926238185834,"score_spread":0.25740403920907773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793206150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030903088,0.00031373484,8.3809925e-7,0.016393123,0.00042798423,0.00031027364,0.000086712585,0.000013687916,0.95155054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853317,0.0005753988,0.0001388799,0.0021760755,0.0004166253,0.00002104885,0.000003591303,0.000016459691,0.011320217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981608,0.00014179654,0.0002623151,0.0002808302,0.00039905528,0.00075525034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763155,0.00018704381,0.00015843075,0.0005828167,0.00014864761,0.0012914863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903587,0.00017024002,0.00027989838,0.00019384833,0.004778376,0.00041912834,0.0009481826,0.00015248379,0.00019933825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005863316,0.00014427702,0.00008891881,0.000067905465,0.0032546239,0.0003625406,0.000051589996,0.00022537053,0.000029322395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024085488,0.0000031466273,0.0019140568,0.000024176601,0.000011481662,0.000057994846,0.008050532,3.5900084e-7,8.280079e-7,0.9790512,0.00751149,0.0033506902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031088895,0.00002359209,0.018370785,0.000046179655,0.00012320372,0.000009438491,0.0020988367,0.00000425584,0.000005681095,0.006377471,0.97242826,0.00020142198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99960274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025518372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002755513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793311086","doi":"","title":"The birth of a criminal code: the evolution of Canada's justice system","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Code (set theory); Criminal code; Law; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.0229213517737482,"score_gpt":0.2662652306118718,"score_spread":0.24334387883812358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793311086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10478319,0.0007684916,0.000009573941,0.0047564255,0.0009825875,0.0003602299,0.00019023895,0.000008761524,0.8881405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897541,0.00019880034,0.000027559816,0.00003365234,0.00019556237,0.000009894828,5.8743416e-7,0.000007594319,0.009772279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984201,0.00014022518,0.00034475958,0.00013739766,0.0005581633,0.00039931558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807006,0.00036928494,0.00043465954,0.0005791879,0.00028579208,0.000261041],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010237596,0.000097648786,0.00020245742,0.00006812127,0.0019374437,0.000043704844,0.0010673882,0.00006413952,0.000015810552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009134257,0.00006760008,0.00006643391,0.000103211016,0.00084980996,0.00011096925,0.000040594037,0.00010497899,0.000001282874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083893,0.000005869513,0.0031897249,0.00031381834,0.00002343461,0.000012586062,0.0037125058,0.000011920261,0.000015717671,0.970614,0.019381473,0.0026881024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010877721,0.00004128567,0.046989538,0.00019060799,0.00022980712,0.000003670192,0.029610803,0.00003255423,0.00003735092,0.00059251196,0.9220286,0.0001345139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054181856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007598832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793332329","doi":"","title":"First annual conference of the British Columbia Provincial Judges' Association, held at Kamloops, British Columbia, September [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Columbia university; Association (psychology); History; Geography; Archaeology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.011363817551093074,"score_gpt":0.2101160875403808,"score_spread":0.19875226998928772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793332329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6304131,0.00012346148,0.0000010648212,0.0019204734,0.00059854856,0.0005946352,0.0013884146,0.000030935207,0.36492935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.609093,0.00035993362,0.000035378853,0.00026142,0.00027726262,0.000034919467,0.0000055028863,0.000018885117,0.38991368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727345,0.00022287705,0.0005398472,0.0003884745,0.00083953387,0.00073584466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758774,0.00035366486,0.00041876332,0.0003255069,0.00079746626,0.000516836],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000763074,0.00011405848,0.00037501534,0.000036844136,0.0016285531,0.0007115582,0.0007313658,0.0002902545,0.0039258916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016770881,0.00017282773,0.00017658896,0.00033501984,0.0006307485,0.00041273178,0.000118851094,0.00013893533,0.00004017874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023633108,0.000018289891,0.47063714,0.000028242062,0.000017929544,0.000016292037,0.000949854,1.4192199e-7,0.000004356692,0.00023428729,0.5231804,0.004910685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021163668,0.000029716128,0.31084743,0.0002447558,0.000037474874,0.000006578848,0.00034907204,1.8141978e-7,0.000002797343,0.000707394,0.68737555,0.0001874039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16419515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010190689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027090088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793498934","doi":"","title":"The criminal code of Canada and the Canada evidence act as amended to date, with commentaries, annotations, forms, etc. [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Law; Programming language; Criminal law; Computer science; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.029159631694286002,"score_gpt":0.2848574269710231,"score_spread":0.25569779527673714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793498934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4399717,0.00087000773,0.0000034002894,0.15114777,0.0005020638,0.0013061769,0.0004265277,0.000009706753,0.40576267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990758,0.0007452511,0.00008367622,0.002409265,0.00006123598,0.000035916695,0.0000047897324,0.000009783968,0.005892053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826103,0.00012046594,0.00028946277,0.00019656809,0.0006398306,0.0004926354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973651,0.0010826996,0.00026127687,0.0005482883,0.00020871371,0.00053392415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008005775,0.00014076434,0.00023460438,0.000046205136,0.0027312315,0.00016018833,0.0009528213,0.000036197966,0.000031529624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001453464,0.00008968267,0.000023777045,0.00010280964,0.0009615465,0.00027216898,0.000068968126,0.00013305155,4.3248323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006385537,0.000012048783,0.03460894,0.000108166256,0.00012594649,0.00010340706,0.019103475,0.000021551112,0.0000059869203,0.47050485,0.46014547,0.014621593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021355586,0.00004998555,0.025489068,0.0001169636,0.00006321138,0.000004112696,0.00793155,0.0000022982624,0.00003437969,0.0004809452,0.96546924,0.00014470432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5507864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003690434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018175801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793505393","doi":"","title":"The British Columbia statute citator (R.S.B.C. 1960 edition): a complete annotating service for R.S.B.C. 1960.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Service (business); Political science; Law; History; Business","score_opus":0.028724359923567637,"score_gpt":0.2602599907223003,"score_spread":0.23153563079873268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793505393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15209894,0.0009651753,0.00023036945,0.03775219,0.0036969918,0.0031397126,0.005054078,0.00020964249,0.7968529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74326074,0.0039949208,0.0045177294,0.0070313364,0.00493565,0.00092186534,0.0001376007,0.00017739185,0.23502274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770254,0.00014156006,0.00045295872,0.00033863715,0.0004645849,0.00089969754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706036,0.0012703234,0.00021206828,0.00028954,0.00050627976,0.0006614316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009035824,0.00013578091,0.00025662902,0.00007094586,0.0030944122,0.00064421515,0.0006000637,0.000111709895,0.0002136913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000863216,0.00014528801,0.000119814045,0.00035185996,0.0004516005,0.00037503702,0.000035430516,0.00009917848,0.000029150735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000371678,0.000023608342,0.006225244,0.00011880909,0.00006261615,0.000040135492,0.003441863,0.0000010899442,0.00009726588,0.04729364,0.8405661,0.102092445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030832685,0.00005257856,0.007932736,0.00019369663,0.00003210499,0.000004189925,0.0010716179,0.0000037924547,0.0000026930204,0.00543534,0.98472685,0.00023607584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9733744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99962217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59116185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002544777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016886215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793603297","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: reflections on the Charter after twenty years","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027833930131516072,"score_gpt":0.2732450616857849,"score_spread":0.2454111315542688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793603297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19925603,0.00019480179,9.656601e-7,0.03631524,0.0007165191,0.0004466806,0.00012830539,0.000012911333,0.76292855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779248,0.00026010795,0.000010880024,0.00055735215,0.00022708,0.0000375985,6.1265257e-7,0.000008623503,0.0209729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988156,0.000116449744,0.00019440844,0.00016934045,0.00026456252,0.00043965137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987925,0.00028645215,0.00006866323,0.00029593523,0.00008205851,0.0004743778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046681712,0.000099844874,0.00012291789,0.0001731432,0.00074197433,0.00004733177,0.0002884606,0.00008820643,0.0003316456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010575624,0.000054649034,0.000058920385,0.00015001473,0.00082915823,0.00011519299,0.000012710701,0.000096180534,0.000039878545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052051902,0.00001750946,0.007034985,0.00001254353,0.000067948946,0.00004166793,0.023480551,1.6541969e-7,0.00003923704,0.8140348,0.13558677,0.019631762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006470904,0.000035934245,0.024501577,0.00005567153,0.000015882484,0.0000010351379,0.00036194368,1.636701e-7,0.000013539388,0.005868688,0.9689911,0.00008973518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83340436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018329614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007756803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5706742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793707576","doi":"","title":"A guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016120359640493465,"score_gpt":0.2644842084453889,"score_spread":0.24836384880489543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793707576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04554213,0.00016066391,0.0000051077373,0.031581573,0.0003014007,0.00035529956,0.00012935957,0.000009269721,0.9219152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498207,0.00011697831,0.00014876811,0.00076312514,0.00027194523,0.000016462329,9.126395e-7,0.000008832897,0.04885228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877614,0.00006999349,0.00023397077,0.0001819194,0.00026869506,0.0004692677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998396,0.0001382359,0.000060479895,0.00026406354,0.0001240025,0.001017247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049477606,0.00009937059,0.00016799483,0.00028134938,0.00042569663,0.000026468208,0.00037834368,0.00008446252,0.00029275732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020096693,0.00006282489,0.00004489083,0.00019466112,0.000429354,0.0001240524,0.000018786923,0.000051398696,0.00004125706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013371728,0.000007486267,0.0072245807,0.000018342313,0.000028973962,0.000035428395,0.015268999,5.16877e-7,0.00007452538,0.54197675,0.40346777,0.031883273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007615355,0.000031348234,0.008582725,0.00006155288,0.000014672246,0.0000014963421,0.00020466167,2.234026e-7,0.000028745677,0.0022254793,0.9886673,0.00010565553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99900436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019979171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015455851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32741573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793729734","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Code of Canada and the Canada Evidence Act as amended to date: with commentaries, annotations, forms, etc., etc. and an [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Law; Political science; Criminology; History; Criminal law; Computer science; Programming language; Sociology; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.03142461581093048,"score_gpt":0.30064020858523743,"score_spread":0.26921559277430696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793729734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80339956,0.000869371,0.0000022324555,0.07347868,0.00027036623,0.0009546,0.00032782854,0.000007637743,0.12068972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943127,0.0009460277,0.00010283511,0.0021094424,0.00006194971,0.000027750335,0.0000056676963,0.000009788599,0.0024238161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983814,0.00013977404,0.00026296955,0.00022213583,0.0005432222,0.00045052698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764144,0.0008049004,0.00022467838,0.00050578074,0.00017353965,0.0006496426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008321261,0.00014446874,0.00023198123,0.000045565055,0.002610627,0.00020212539,0.00072295073,0.00003958752,0.000020607931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009779988,0.00009405121,0.000015740334,0.00008205586,0.0010645364,0.00038211857,0.00006657075,0.00013050382,1.6961182e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010791856,0.000019046647,0.06762393,0.00018103655,0.00015786976,0.00014822742,0.04426835,0.000023750319,0.000013799398,0.617577,0.23489228,0.03401552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002802537,0.00009951725,0.042261716,0.00011632627,0.00008085047,0.000006872062,0.012752827,0.0000069061916,0.0000315758,0.00069606415,0.94348234,0.00018476526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70859003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002976358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013755767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793731855","doi":"","title":"New directions in legal rights : proceedings of a conference held at the Faculty of Law, Dalhousie University, February 16, 1974","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.026744523261707023,"score_gpt":0.25477247203246983,"score_spread":0.22802794877076282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793731855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2834394,0.00004917623,0.000002036462,0.003049818,0.00008606982,0.00019027718,0.00008337549,0.000010482423,0.7130894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90709305,0.00022167689,0.00007256684,0.00003776645,0.00006363668,0.0000017717038,0.0000016234101,0.000005314323,0.092502594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893546,0.000035553367,0.00023055567,0.0001897359,0.00030069688,0.0003079894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999128,0.00012866766,0.00015030673,0.00011928689,0.00017664421,0.00029713736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002475136,0.00010308631,0.00021839811,0.00019498316,0.00033791637,0.000013425422,0.00042105405,0.00009440526,0.00032496473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070864946,0.00007521864,0.00007503315,0.0003154595,0.00075200957,0.0003224646,0.00005727917,0.00007757356,0.0000069118823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038959875,0.000019129815,0.00975753,0.000027853603,0.000016120819,0.000011096407,0.007063843,3.2351667e-7,0.00024415553,0.95855844,0.02083801,0.003424527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020807401,0.00004907593,0.01485683,0.00016578319,0.000028944803,0.0000021815442,0.0011358755,2.1984278e-7,0.00056720246,0.0037171259,0.9791483,0.00012038654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9583103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032984713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012280055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3558136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793776575","doi":"","title":"9. Police Investigation of Sexual Assault Complaints: How Far Have We Come Since Jane Doe?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Forensic engineering; Psychology; Engineering; History; Medical emergency; Medicine; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.06652837737680233,"score_gpt":0.298888206144632,"score_spread":0.23235982876782968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793776575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018223616,0.0019235781,0.0008646686,0.18385382,0.0043853656,0.0028155975,0.0032431474,0.00037182137,0.8007196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5150853,0.003165846,0.0015200871,0.0147308,0.0064761885,0.00023436535,0.0054188557,0.00019995992,0.4531686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528813,0.00032112782,0.0008373542,0.00077450933,0.0020824503,0.0006964422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958082,0.00059689954,0.00119778,0.0006533745,0.0011425535,0.0006012294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015113539,0.0006153809,0.0008555203,0.00031832658,0.0010864605,0.0003490227,0.0009194488,0.00091319653,0.004294856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001930937,0.0006657596,0.00020391482,0.00016229146,0.0016171507,0.009788412,0.00022725806,0.0007441355,0.0012790081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006932304,0.0000685456,0.00009956573,0.0002776572,0.00009132936,0.000013306654,0.002509227,0.000008308165,0.00036396776,0.96238756,0.030374192,0.003737004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005456387,0.0002792812,0.0026540342,0.0010600326,0.0003884452,0.000028641893,0.002629452,0.00001168791,0.00043153987,0.0132151935,0.97768354,0.0010725028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04796672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005219065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000470801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793815299","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada, relating to criminal law, to procedure in criminal cases and to evidence: compiled [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Parliament; Law; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0524002021043856,"score_gpt":0.30988433615076555,"score_spread":0.25748413404637993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793815299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323036,0.00009860038,4.068903e-7,0.0075279833,0.00024007831,0.00076336466,0.00005492376,0.0000018610796,0.059009172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794877,0.000032302272,0.00017309042,0.000498734,0.00006274015,0.000021747246,2.4147343e-7,0.000008532846,0.0012538669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981428,0.00013475966,0.0004812126,0.00023339546,0.0006146633,0.0003931929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998123,0.00040071775,0.00033321616,0.00048733468,0.00020340327,0.00045232987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007579669,0.00013521958,0.00033499498,0.00011959167,0.0004994864,0.000027749486,0.00082582916,0.00007062481,0.000020907817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003434918,0.00010254633,0.000058428144,0.00020676044,0.00036437387,0.00014795281,0.00016263206,0.00012059151,3.8614365e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007719073,0.0001307341,0.47298962,0.002073676,0.00006666974,0.000086129105,0.2054826,0.00044503334,0.003477718,0.2685493,0.03546255,0.010464064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025645611,0.00027928094,0.87782896,0.0036951678,0.0001304285,0.000007628483,0.016054733,0.0000042119223,0.0029508562,0.00031270934,0.09817316,0.0003064335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99382883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4048393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026710698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033313825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59097296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793830147","doi":"","title":"Accidental, incidental, fundamental: the impact of the Charter of Rights on Canada's legal and political culture","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Charter; Political science; Politics; Law; Political culture; Legal culture","score_opus":0.012635476544918103,"score_gpt":0.27473730986177547,"score_spread":0.2621018333168574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793830147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244608,0.00008625442,9.4571256e-8,0.004298039,0.0001920448,0.00023540472,0.00018472355,0.0000034215036,0.17053922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957277,0.000073353556,0.0000032325918,0.00025004262,0.00015449461,0.000004937787,0.0000011738715,0.00000709294,0.0037779266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859744,0.00011684308,0.00025950753,0.00015335306,0.00045934645,0.00041348164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989952,0.00016235885,0.00013064663,0.0002542111,0.00007056633,0.0003870518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020111637,0.00012671828,0.0001994108,0.00007028872,0.00030086676,0.000021148851,0.0004260712,0.00007270167,0.00015870492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010318088,0.000059605012,0.0001117117,0.0001319892,0.00073520374,0.00014444783,0.000041769526,0.00009350295,0.0000018151558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084774896,0.00006221355,0.19834554,0.00003356504,0.0001194867,0.00003448629,0.006710372,9.271852e-7,0.00073237345,0.6257349,0.16618706,0.0019542566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003339643,0.000195028,0.45497712,0.00025274933,0.0000590576,0.000014619565,0.0023630336,4.890565e-7,0.0009088693,0.0046030995,0.5360633,0.00022866164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99885625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62113184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047077483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019252583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34153256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793833437","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Criminal Recodification Task Force","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Task force; Task (project management); Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Geology; Public administration","score_opus":0.024611312275310823,"score_gpt":0.2766210391878722,"score_spread":0.25200972691256135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793833437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074771956,0.0004919346,0.000004438136,0.042769384,0.0015288418,0.00041156347,0.00031731528,0.000042230044,0.87966233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737169,0.007293223,0.0003485814,0.00037061132,0.0005149746,0.00002994688,0.000030042322,0.000018962066,0.017676748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979312,0.00011061158,0.0003279658,0.00031471383,0.00046991342,0.00084561115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973579,0.00012377732,0.0003534895,0.00058696826,0.00036451052,0.0012133392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009543532,0.00016710596,0.00023580405,0.0013623971,0.0027061421,0.00027525978,0.0009580794,0.00027091563,0.00039089122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013283849,0.00019153813,0.00017291695,0.00066727446,0.0004920567,0.0006088876,0.000022434231,0.00015706872,0.00008949574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017225297,0.000026996071,0.42978427,0.00005886986,0.00008895623,0.00003594117,0.00883385,0.000002133296,0.000040344778,0.20456813,0.34110603,0.015437252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078549674,0.000023581817,0.16116123,0.000030436513,0.00006368141,6.1027526e-7,0.0016765721,0.000001387023,0.000012466474,0.001250825,0.8354934,0.00020728871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.898945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065168913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021802497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793974233","doi":"","title":"In pursuit of justice : issues in Canadian law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02379990379892244,"score_gpt":0.29897189283703834,"score_spread":0.2751719890381159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793974233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09022805,0.00040819502,3.3308467e-7,0.017380856,0.00034467093,0.00024428952,0.000074670985,0.0000073127,0.89131165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98007745,0.0009453176,0.00008673991,0.0006067036,0.00015621388,0.00001269904,0.00000129677,0.000011804132,0.01810175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823356,0.00011442322,0.00036439707,0.00021291175,0.00032557762,0.0007491586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986368,0.00020656988,0.000076284334,0.00022044496,0.0000814038,0.0007784961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084639725,0.00011428085,0.00026457917,0.00066208816,0.00010692199,0.00001796708,0.000509417,0.00014035872,0.0005631186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046215454,0.00010590713,0.00004554895,0.00042538083,0.00038341602,0.00033107583,0.000017564242,0.00008993911,0.000028424862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011117894,0.000013689855,0.020617398,0.00005236895,0.0000046597156,0.0001490558,0.0054598534,0.0000017827904,0.00006015499,0.95546836,0.013818656,0.0043429327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014848531,0.000025013485,0.013731138,0.00016375312,0.000013577761,9.0737603e-7,0.0008472511,3.9999566e-7,0.000057553894,0.0042188345,0.9806463,0.00014679633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96682763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005784272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026978455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61657536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794178963","doi":"","title":"The digest of Canadian criminal case law: comprising the reported cases on criminal law decided in any of the courts in [...]","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07531184584852742,"score_gpt":0.32266360485561224,"score_spread":0.24735175900708484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794178963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64255524,0.0001575543,5.509406e-8,0.0037800376,0.00029734304,0.00037442663,0.000056671026,0.0000033661197,0.3527753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984586,0.00021958428,0.000018553119,0.00040632696,0.00010108453,0.000015783777,0.000001854412,0.000015760377,0.0007624355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974326,0.00032631285,0.0007159354,0.00027676093,0.00052857044,0.0007198458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689394,0.0009161055,0.0005457658,0.0010109997,0.00019435603,0.00043881623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016385593,0.0001948199,0.0003554224,0.00032781568,0.0020664928,0.000121163386,0.0011173163,0.00013875162,0.000025719122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014211114,0.00013108719,0.0001248682,0.00028798514,0.0022367034,0.0002145341,0.000063468724,0.00033108576,0.0000015103001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001084458,0.00006173152,0.044563584,0.00008658887,0.000034194065,0.005516445,0.0243506,0.000054365362,0.000045117675,0.9185972,0.0030139023,0.0035677783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061125006,0.00018398691,0.33972192,0.0009465012,0.0002461056,0.0005557186,0.02443351,0.000017174982,0.00050579273,0.0043444145,0.627892,0.0005415841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037751198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002701457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794189104","doi":"","title":"Entrapment in Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Restitution; Criminal justice; Criminology; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.03610771842042323,"score_gpt":0.3035160603853845,"score_spread":0.26740834196496127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794189104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099772215,0.00013726788,2.3990475e-7,0.0059173205,0.00046873852,0.00023847906,0.000042373693,0.000009809613,0.89341354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884218,0.000417747,0.00010804247,0.0006664289,0.00023563091,0.000017889255,0.000004758079,0.000012846487,0.010114887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980589,0.000070423994,0.00027593152,0.00025891,0.00032835282,0.0010074582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997698,0.000055141318,0.000109350985,0.00046629104,0.00007193121,0.0015992969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006665567,0.00013997513,0.00022443522,0.0003999971,0.0011646901,0.00015055094,0.00080942677,0.00013855992,0.00051577925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027135186,0.00016107025,0.0000700456,0.00009806194,0.00054253853,0.00036349977,0.000026241752,0.00015898433,0.00004666642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008708361,0.00001383089,0.03874669,0.000029067887,0.000008754987,0.0003384699,0.0069141383,0.000002107259,0.000005456317,0.93824774,0.007837517,0.007847548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011511309,0.000020270883,0.06615685,0.000062438055,0.000017131837,0.0000019654592,0.0008432807,0.0000014426157,0.000014530296,0.0018112137,0.9307725,0.00018325205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99992645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072812155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037781822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89579725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794411980","doi":"","title":"Snow's Annotated Criminal code of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snow; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Geography; Political science; Computer science; Meteorology; Criminal law; Law; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.035669955076311446,"score_gpt":0.28877912148614193,"score_spread":0.2531091664098305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794411980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16350259,0.00009795021,0.0000015152751,0.0034152057,0.00050265255,0.00016356363,0.00019255074,0.000009531956,0.83211446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458553,0.00023556365,0.00013866865,0.00018492772,0.00017571556,0.000005946365,0.0000054976413,0.000012049054,0.02465607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984143,0.00006276794,0.00030896164,0.00020132,0.00047303792,0.0005396438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826044,0.00012358748,0.000265413,0.00047230313,0.00022485708,0.0006534249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040479886,0.00012391632,0.0002685061,0.00014647968,0.00087593537,0.00004704754,0.00080125895,0.00008857075,0.00027994032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091712293,0.00013469535,0.00006157385,0.00009447375,0.0005184484,0.00022107626,0.000035864403,0.000110014174,0.0000043229415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010542363,0.000057523423,0.05898063,0.00027951095,0.00009934601,0.0005006432,0.01751873,0.000021107999,0.00014655235,0.44272536,0.44379592,0.035769247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113238166,0.000029021114,0.050825864,0.00008176511,0.000039799426,0.0000016481243,0.0012726798,0.0000031833406,0.00014147104,0.000613939,0.9467052,0.00017216103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81108296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024392885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072137453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794426105","doi":"","title":"Newfoundland. Department of Justice.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03330978501612564,"score_gpt":0.3034568449634155,"score_spread":0.2701470599472899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794426105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19639008,0.00096365187,0.000003283442,0.0055060154,0.0011200921,0.0002727721,0.00014120826,0.000018643588,0.79558426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98601,0.011315762,0.00035795633,0.00009045987,0.00027402345,0.0000103149505,0.00000713103,0.000008663845,0.0019256976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880046,0.000048164653,0.00025174915,0.00017450945,0.0003270219,0.00039811034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986411,0.00008359573,0.00023637766,0.00045935588,0.00014777073,0.0004318107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035686462,0.000109200955,0.0002192287,0.0006298104,0.00090562244,0.0000635322,0.0006596192,0.00010144768,0.00017253045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032508245,0.00010888342,0.0001421695,0.00044504562,0.0012487599,0.00025898652,0.00003434608,0.000062366795,0.000011620786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004642508,0.000071038165,0.4628829,0.0001858839,0.00009414177,0.000044027744,0.005038212,0.0000017236406,0.000045923316,0.4047369,0.11173918,0.015113623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097029006,0.00004594146,0.123018235,0.00004089206,0.00008840251,4.6792354e-7,0.0009288311,2.9396557e-7,0.00001579818,0.0011102996,0.874536,0.000117832635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9032838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79365855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004230783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049033714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6965407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794783408","doi":"","title":"Toward a new General Part of the Criminal Code of Canada: details on reform options","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law and economics; Computer science; Criminal law; Sociology; Programming language; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.0694303143122252,"score_gpt":0.29164327381409877,"score_spread":0.22221295950187359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794783408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21613407,0.00010715531,0.000001232658,0.008968935,0.00060418644,0.00022361949,0.00018579661,0.0000047763233,0.7737702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95739996,0.0002832377,0.00018451165,0.00025171222,0.000317239,0.0000069503694,0.0000020358425,0.000009852646,0.041544516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985527,0.000058438876,0.0003277014,0.00016321064,0.00049925176,0.00039868962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984761,0.000053732125,0.0003092605,0.0005527728,0.00013280685,0.000475346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032484738,0.00011176588,0.00024464994,0.00008526766,0.0006171014,0.000024885807,0.0008867245,0.00008014388,0.0001398475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038853925,0.000090904316,0.00010481256,0.00008462368,0.00045037916,0.00013329451,0.000044676483,0.00011433917,0.0000016458819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004704562,0.000029764566,0.007939562,0.00009933407,0.000047972262,0.00002590919,0.0067803864,0.000036862508,0.00006640335,0.8579906,0.117090024,0.009846095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012795345,0.000051381703,0.057554074,0.00012872722,0.00006690494,0.0000015911556,0.0010987798,0.0000029089383,0.0003594021,0.0013521526,0.93911654,0.0001395873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8566385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004207935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009080225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794799786","doi":"","title":"The principles of Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06429185903477523,"score_gpt":0.3009383358003623,"score_spread":0.23664647676558703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794799786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04323463,0.00026383836,3.0271585e-7,0.0074966713,0.00047436493,0.00021840117,0.0000662471,0.000008703856,0.9482368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96722746,0.0012902239,0.00013282808,0.0002527713,0.00028478494,0.000012786645,0.0000026176933,0.000013974887,0.030782549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983395,0.000082201426,0.00031928674,0.00019643542,0.00037806112,0.00068452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775314,0.0001786925,0.00023503955,0.0006772161,0.00018708748,0.000968834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008271758,0.00012768616,0.0002121908,0.00031353725,0.0028942947,0.00015299619,0.0012648036,0.00011774534,0.00013101628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006685961,0.00011058781,0.00009960126,0.0001425105,0.001449372,0.0002580837,0.000042882304,0.00013624798,0.000018209823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006350548,0.0000037187028,0.003110905,0.000018805624,0.000011336449,0.00002830176,0.0025700137,0.000001107585,0.000005554618,0.98452395,0.005221949,0.0044980347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006115696,0.000024926703,0.02436193,0.000049425053,0.000034327113,0.000001753466,0.001357722,0.000001254699,0.000047577363,0.0017934754,0.9721352,0.00013123527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99952555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98273045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019469684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033018333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794915509","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal cases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05326525378524356,"score_gpt":0.3151482237126901,"score_spread":0.26188296992744653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794915509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0867966,0.00017921337,4.9615096e-7,0.007535069,0.00062764075,0.00019220132,0.00009874927,0.000018202554,0.9045518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95753086,0.0004878275,0.00015334021,0.0004954474,0.000496606,0.000012311932,0.000005976155,0.000016683454,0.04080092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982651,0.00006536976,0.0002367915,0.00026203162,0.00033670658,0.0008340249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717,0.000109230714,0.00013868893,0.00058812683,0.00014658293,0.0018474162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045732196,0.00015079761,0.00022743754,0.00042753792,0.0022995707,0.00020129069,0.0009303057,0.00014758026,0.0008102515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001006791,0.00016847074,0.00009453637,0.00009621902,0.00051876623,0.0004131635,0.000030193694,0.00014378635,0.00010963241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022645827,0.000020384525,0.07825407,0.00008036681,0.000037420195,0.001660401,0.011456018,0.000002154671,0.000010231522,0.7053852,0.15421508,0.048856027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007048533,0.000030015033,0.040418472,0.000046736197,0.00004081368,0.000010306203,0.0012390082,7.8940604e-7,0.000009839654,0.00074862636,0.95717615,0.00020873809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8707343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037690563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055236374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794975037","doi":"","title":"Note – “Between” a Rock and a Hard Place: Martin Marietta v. Vulcan and the Rise of the Backdoor Standstill","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backdoor; Geology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.019632331935467862,"score_gpt":0.2777221952549317,"score_spread":0.2580898633194638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794975037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265598,0.00074700895,0.0019095865,0.04339748,0.00038803334,0.0003184314,0.00001222311,0.000025131423,0.026642328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983891,0.00006468619,0.0002819016,0.00026920065,0.00041744203,0.0000016680979,7.489764e-8,0.000007620899,0.00056828954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984133,0.00043608216,0.0002841103,0.0001394339,0.0004436459,0.0002833789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846005,0.00081461814,0.00030956353,0.00012719388,0.00012732786,0.00016122048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033266505,0.00010404025,0.0002135732,0.000016791719,0.0017405815,0.00026986617,0.00029203945,0.0000610404,0.00006342097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014097505,0.000057151825,0.00007067669,0.00011574366,0.0009658742,0.0001910351,0.00012899285,0.00034852873,0.0000029823066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022608705,0.00011982668,0.17193608,0.00033204918,0.00019508043,0.00002285492,0.11303538,0.00015811068,0.0012493472,0.58027625,0.030922724,0.09949141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038130046,0.00025595998,0.037740752,0.000796451,0.00039225208,0.00019425488,0.00777291,0.0022709502,0.00031817766,0.029320372,0.9166782,0.00044671888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002550439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039470065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000267735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007337996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795072251","doi":"","title":"An abridgment of the Canadian criminal case law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science","score_opus":0.046727257032540964,"score_gpt":0.31729041890149745,"score_spread":0.27056316186895646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795072251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24785629,0.000069798494,4.2901615e-7,0.0036152718,0.0005007197,0.00025947345,0.00012042044,0.0000072960684,0.7475703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946265,0.00006107596,0.00011151479,0.0005126846,0.00024114056,0.0000098166465,0.0000022482575,0.0000129256705,0.004422096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842334,0.00011386284,0.00027248132,0.00022315735,0.00038903573,0.000578123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975247,0.000049282877,0.00020675368,0.00087855523,0.00016378862,0.001176947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006107725,0.00013234597,0.00020731096,0.00015831644,0.0028405318,0.00013852405,0.0010749347,0.00012709625,0.00020848746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020824313,0.00011780605,0.00010303002,0.00008697728,0.0011314664,0.00034020148,0.000034353507,0.00014930616,0.0000064260853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010139185,0.000023341643,0.011227553,0.000051172396,0.000020364147,0.00097022223,0.010356291,0.00000822641,0.000021311214,0.96200204,0.0076568895,0.0076524755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011224255,0.00005183094,0.021929022,0.00006849381,0.00007812233,0.000057639438,0.0020791853,0.0000056362037,0.00011774159,0.0012196208,0.97407174,0.00020874914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99985915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9664148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003735976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035953627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795170171","doi":"","title":"Common Canadian Criminal Code offences and procedures 2014","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); Psychology","score_opus":0.035624105976031155,"score_gpt":0.3052703561717316,"score_spread":0.26964625019570043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795170171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22035947,0.00053938566,3.755873e-7,0.008678529,0.00036004084,0.00026647685,0.00012282196,0.00001754933,0.76965535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863707,0.0017727759,0.00013957797,0.00048498003,0.00029324437,0.000015477144,0.000005180944,0.0000141352375,0.010903969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983845,0.0000708388,0.0002422768,0.00029199288,0.00031736563,0.00069302326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777013,0.000097094344,0.00016175235,0.00040022648,0.000109299064,0.001461482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051388954,0.00016178966,0.00026478956,0.0003230525,0.0021296253,0.00024386261,0.00075885555,0.00014791977,0.00022123012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005514361,0.00016847247,0.000053081385,0.0000656552,0.000978594,0.0004230115,0.000037110825,0.00014569996,0.000028932835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034110046,0.00002200119,0.33721033,0.00026077082,0.000042172072,0.00024328651,0.019039314,0.000002067725,0.000019432122,0.38436326,0.22313286,0.035630368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008417065,0.000039330633,0.15160215,0.00008839711,0.00004255871,0.000005710614,0.0015542526,0.0000024750932,0.000011455122,0.0021719742,0.84418076,0.00021678429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001703558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037737144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795254289","doi":"","title":"Towards a codification of Canadian criminal law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0637236969040211,"score_gpt":0.3122696101341357,"score_spread":0.24854591323011457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795254289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05352399,0.000117619136,0.0000019719203,0.005769537,0.0003764419,0.00023258151,0.0001266616,0.000011433138,0.9398398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906159,0.00055951235,0.0003403032,0.0002877804,0.00023231206,0.000013632432,0.00000959771,0.000013415687,0.007927513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846035,0.0000691031,0.0003160544,0.0002284314,0.000373045,0.00055301306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783325,0.000051172578,0.00023776674,0.0005782614,0.00024289357,0.0010566734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057956134,0.00012848376,0.00025095613,0.00059927657,0.0011181383,0.00009240711,0.00085648295,0.00015125221,0.0003111178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044702998,0.00014416953,0.00009207552,0.00018614321,0.00083800335,0.00034565895,0.000023421246,0.00011580714,0.00002422499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000910084,0.000009537804,0.0022150453,0.000047137364,0.000012090234,0.000031721367,0.0053109857,8.761801e-7,0.000033427263,0.972792,0.009115544,0.010422488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009196724,0.000033510707,0.033643,0.00006070232,0.000049056653,0.0000018810781,0.0011069992,0.0000017485802,0.00012916884,0.0024056842,0.96231055,0.00016573447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99973714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026576495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037453834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795258406","doi":"10.29173/alr1445","title":"Getting Away with Murder: the Canadian Criminal Justice System by David M. Paciocco (Toronto: Irwin Law, 1999)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0193489653874117,"score_gpt":0.29558439819127197,"score_spread":0.27623543280386026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795258406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010653582,0.12701084,0.000001977631,0.020994918,0.00020433603,0.0008446357,0.000014083703,0.000053395008,0.8498105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939167,0.02767282,0.00009830572,0.020646196,0.0005110439,0.00012438776,0.000025035255,0.00004366885,0.011711542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732506,0.0004998025,0.0003956526,0.00042178435,0.00057655125,0.0007811517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820983,0.0005429858,0.00012895207,0.0005394906,0.00010704191,0.0004717065],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012855134,0.0002587421,0.00041524315,0.000006982579,0.0026677854,0.00025655184,0.00070998183,0.00010480711,0.001966949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012457102,0.00017209798,0.000120703706,0.00019259607,0.0005308345,0.0004986896,0.000023826717,0.0002200347,0.00053686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013350894,0.000027293563,0.0000386794,0.0041537904,0.000043260694,0.00003751523,0.0060485173,0.0000020438363,0.0000025683182,0.9255186,0.045243055,0.018871348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007231742,0.000040350766,0.000014768974,0.0038536394,0.00096045906,0.000038900445,0.002006655,0.0000057355796,0.0000032386051,0.000015776794,0.992706,0.0002821686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99096316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005243779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003860599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795312601","doi":"","title":"All about law : exploring the Canadian legal system, third edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.046232001581840515,"score_gpt":0.26050587964386873,"score_spread":0.21427387806202822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795312601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010132887,0.00017565418,0.0000037255866,0.020049825,0.0017091434,0.00032808137,0.00013171435,0.000056343462,0.96741265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97958976,0.0003628278,0.000048973914,0.0013167247,0.0014136211,0.00008861602,0.000004417043,0.00002185104,0.017153213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778277,0.00016596161,0.00033627442,0.00028077804,0.0005237193,0.0009104975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780196,0.00025056954,0.00009983221,0.00039245756,0.00016829498,0.0012869004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008521515,0.0001721696,0.00022159776,0.00026879937,0.0013375762,0.00013672387,0.0006789116,0.00012360276,0.00020048473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019728937,0.000120810924,0.00011005723,0.00023835927,0.00059856306,0.00064972613,0.000023847788,0.00015232382,0.00016709951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036395486,0.0000024486906,0.00058698154,0.000018979976,0.000014844306,0.00005361585,0.0022614573,8.012434e-7,0.0000050982803,0.9465579,0.047922622,0.0025716538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008659738,0.000016947875,0.0035671645,0.00018408684,0.00003220363,0.0000055833702,0.001430246,4.5518496e-7,0.000018892686,0.0008434327,0.993619,0.0001953413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9991414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96945685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011075838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031438915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795692973","doi":"","title":"Canadian criminal cases: selected highlights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0351658351896131,"score_gpt":0.2931825906930289,"score_spread":0.2580167555034158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795692973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12058292,0.00015449928,7.10013e-7,0.009711376,0.0006932487,0.00028394398,0.00010642691,0.00003306708,0.8684338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95894545,0.00053650886,0.00017895715,0.00036608524,0.0005504387,0.000017173297,0.000013381973,0.000022587396,0.039369427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781966,0.00009906042,0.0003009075,0.00034158668,0.00041163914,0.0010271578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661326,0.00012299561,0.00017884806,0.00064309343,0.00031722794,0.0021245943],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004233504,0.00019772204,0.0002894141,0.00054785196,0.0026859234,0.0002380343,0.0010601901,0.00020584572,0.0007083499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010554483,0.00021447465,0.00008969239,0.00021846719,0.00047360655,0.00046590855,0.000030033285,0.00017937348,0.000119578224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003743311,0.000030665346,0.035985027,0.000096305426,0.00006539178,0.0019778132,0.014635957,0.0000019237816,0.000031281957,0.73307234,0.19923905,0.014826832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109275345,0.000044503806,0.041380655,0.00005710103,0.000060802962,0.000013378246,0.0006905671,0.0000014042105,0.000024277097,0.00079094147,0.9565477,0.00027939052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8383625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007422113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008113169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796252764","doi":"10.11575/prism/34190","title":"The Abuse of Criminal Record Checks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.020058997699264135,"score_gpt":0.251745915074539,"score_spread":0.23168691737527483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796252764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88078445,0.00007940815,0.0031565686,0.0018518253,0.00029315334,0.0000921524,1.5702089e-7,0.000019830371,0.11372248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810593,0.0006214071,0.009798293,0.000027386408,0.00003908102,1.348361e-7,5.762333e-7,0.000004147054,0.008449683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993775,0.000052855932,0.00007335649,0.00009863293,0.0002442716,0.00015340102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993844,0.00016613546,0.000101773,0.00017340692,0.00009695728,0.00007732477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044544385,0.000044916123,0.00009625442,0.000028039225,0.00051874307,0.000010006632,0.0004699559,0.00007400861,0.00015612472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097940414,0.000042999687,0.00007878303,0.00009026765,0.0008165793,0.00016164471,0.000047744525,0.00016270461,0.00001842425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020333346,0.0001264787,0.004302057,0.000048183992,0.00003649508,0.000016601487,0.07350776,5.0845095e-8,0.0038692902,0.20292331,0.008223762,0.7067427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019935798,0.00005799498,0.022623468,0.000022720567,0.00008902366,7.099894e-7,0.0059521548,0.00022446564,0.00038944505,0.0027919286,0.9675309,0.00011785055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018170726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049731764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95930713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013983652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009819457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796758370","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n2p16","title":"The Credit Card and the Crimes Associated with It","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credit card; Credit card fraud; Card security code; Chargeback; Legislature; Credit card interest; Liability; Computer security; Business; Criminal liability; Political science; Computer science; Criminal law; Law; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.030946850836978335,"score_gpt":0.32203123777876624,"score_spread":0.2910843869417879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796758370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7040386,0.002243523,0.000024049814,0.123190604,0.0006351229,0.00011676762,0.0000067536507,0.000007695119,0.16973685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966751,0.00033230297,0.000016454494,0.0009751845,0.00067580247,2.6252394e-7,5.0509815e-8,0.0000024474957,0.0013224431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993339,0.00011624009,0.00012106436,0.000036063982,0.00023218266,0.00016052212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998889,0.0006248458,0.000114594644,0.00004644409,0.00023899374,0.00008609875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011734759,0.0000396655,0.00009372988,0.0000073124315,0.0010602676,0.00019290614,0.000109692846,0.00002649742,0.000008038301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035773165,0.00001706767,0.000026698504,0.000034387427,0.0020410398,0.00009125271,0.00001827095,0.00009525347,6.793088e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002818129,0.0000049101277,0.00030037755,0.0000013849693,0.000028323018,0.0000035271146,0.0055258726,8.404402e-8,0.0000019301456,0.9874926,0.0064540007,0.0001587851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051400263,0.0002605747,0.0031138656,0.000078710524,0.00012991618,0.000028306285,0.012009801,0.000013521779,0.000033039785,0.052473675,0.9312802,0.00006436843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030546535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00624437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93501896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001828102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008794586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8154828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796979865","doi":"10.29173/alr1356","title":"The Rest of the Story of R. v. Stinchcombe: A Case Study in Disclosure Issues","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Law; Duty; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Political science; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Computer science","score_opus":0.07175251714409084,"score_gpt":0.37182720912482137,"score_spread":0.30007469198073056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796979865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.588022,0.32428065,6.9182285e-8,0.041094717,0.00024227447,0.0017250337,0.0000024925714,0.0000073617434,0.04462537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97031546,0.026263986,0.0000027960496,0.00018113303,0.000030752097,0.000022994827,7.422737e-8,0.0000045419897,0.0031782708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979098,0.0011683844,0.00032533074,0.00012897531,0.00030794874,0.00015958831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799633,0.001291356,0.00017012615,0.00044424686,0.000063098145,0.000034848457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001710375,0.00007805675,0.00025887677,0.0000067390342,0.00042582856,0.000013847266,0.00044660433,0.000026110636,0.00013974546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011659592,0.000040573887,0.00009436089,0.0003110664,0.00048166368,0.00009400803,0.00007742339,0.0001514345,0.000012951094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022527991,0.0016987573,0.09371997,0.004016142,0.00011950265,0.0003096353,0.13679084,0.000003498506,0.000014797011,0.653451,0.049780637,0.060072638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009152137,0.000064856424,0.0024557342,0.0020994516,0.00009915248,0.000018747789,0.006221679,0.0000013841819,0.0000037640007,0.00013996927,0.98872006,0.000083676874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19524522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6978073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93893945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002278909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028652266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8101137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799451503","doi":"","title":"Examining the Role of Courts in Canada's Policy-Making Process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Process management; Law; Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03627179171506214,"score_gpt":0.34450689808745605,"score_spread":0.30823510637239393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799451503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71850896,0.00004086705,0.0000042619126,0.0022167035,0.000041874526,0.000049479426,4.3543142e-7,0.0000055114433,0.27913192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992766,0.0000038372527,0.000020949647,0.0002824203,0.0001771281,0.0000024265157,4.5987306e-8,0.0000019784338,0.00023463221],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938637,0.000040769573,0.00009175182,0.00007054686,0.00023299153,0.00017758994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996836,0.000119424214,0.0000382876,0.00006962147,0.00006308683,0.000025978328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000358082,0.000031390242,0.00005583264,0.00002020015,0.00016393057,0.000014715047,0.00020849383,0.000015126565,0.00011969097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025348223,0.000021702663,0.0000063104667,0.00018164123,0.00015765941,0.000070223,0.000021524074,0.00003651591,0.0000024803317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026495476,0.000027658558,0.41128254,0.000028007424,0.000009021395,0.0000064892943,0.12678055,0.00003768978,0.00042467736,0.3775865,0.0016172864,0.08217306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016578475,0.00009747506,0.17288321,0.00032695243,0.000016446504,0.0000031144702,0.55163366,0.00074712385,0.00621723,0.035053372,0.23249893,0.00035670426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4248531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013234318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001890323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33533517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800268292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0001","title":"Reforming the bifurcated process under section 38 of the Canada Evidence Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Principal (computer security); Political science; Process (computing); Criticism; Law; Privilege (computing); Law and economics; Relation (database); Business; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02897294672493908,"score_gpt":0.2765586495432078,"score_spread":0.24758570281826872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800268292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92332846,0.0004116896,0.000099124125,0.008288348,0.0008907156,0.000121290024,0.0000023597488,0.000008621309,0.06684937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891883,0.00012654027,0.000017362694,0.000056816192,0.00018884256,1.7647903e-8,4.581374e-8,0.0000017032886,0.00068982504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914664,0.00013426339,0.000089755784,0.00006592308,0.00042445786,0.00013894757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991749,0.00008018989,0.00020608435,0.000107886946,0.0003738515,0.000057108482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231846,0.00004458735,0.00007630163,0.0000050216613,0.0018156886,0.000016889748,0.0005472291,0.00003583606,0.00045504794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007810802,0.00002906646,0.000051157618,0.000067833236,0.0005736986,0.00067087554,0.000046281824,0.00010780911,5.464108e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002526351,0.00041060484,0.069352254,0.00042049418,0.0007980545,0.00007520409,0.60138947,0.0011711144,0.013390992,0.20790794,0.07059249,0.031965047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004629979,0.00029144637,0.058418203,0.0010875479,0.0002272189,0.00006191045,0.5444763,0.00010633627,0.0040636533,0.0014345399,0.38905755,0.00031233625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9803145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31846505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006294869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007738818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801425793","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0114","title":"The need to justify and limit procedural innovation in national security litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Legitimacy; Plaintiff; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Procedural justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law; National security; Business; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.024272660860192585,"score_gpt":0.29378463912315755,"score_spread":0.26951197826296497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801425793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8450338,0.00010542753,0.000086040316,0.028796537,0.00021021685,0.00012838938,0.0000026280613,0.000009386705,0.12562753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990911,0.00007035555,0.0002799988,0.00013576743,0.0001721854,4.456345e-8,3.9932956e-7,0.0000010119843,0.0002491303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994228,0.000059723097,0.00009290507,0.000059294343,0.0002607578,0.00010454226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992606,0.00006094416,0.00007910267,0.000026708765,0.00052166986,0.000050968374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080456154,0.00003095103,0.000045404944,0.000020115902,0.0010456697,0.000049082522,0.00012930317,0.000034125584,0.000084858424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021416979,0.000029321505,0.000012776952,0.00008966441,0.0002990676,0.0005584361,0.000029005849,0.00006402183,0.000002668552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103212835,0.000012498974,0.0009714762,0.000004679754,0.0000050779786,0.00000153012,0.03054609,0.0000018905693,0.00017559138,0.9616012,0.0041841087,0.00239264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005352516,0.00023105343,0.034659084,0.00012418565,0.000018222987,0.000011708814,0.1103224,0.0001509172,0.00016054254,0.031928007,0.82170194,0.00015669779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04159879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5295134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002774054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012316334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801470191","doi":"10.1163/18786561-00801001","title":"Accountability or Accounting? Elaboration of the Paris Agreement’s Implementation and Compliance Committee at cop 23","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Obligation; Compliance (psychology); Mandate; Political science; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Modalities; Politics; Accounting; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08577791533271274,"score_gpt":0.4124142641102893,"score_spread":0.3266363487775766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801470191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98022705,0.000050915824,0.000010530523,0.0027655168,0.00028834512,0.00031937688,0.000050613133,0.000020388854,0.016267246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989627,0.00011629619,0.00009835846,0.0005439071,0.000111529436,0.000009153771,0.000007711576,0.00000390824,0.00014641274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990283,0.00011420947,0.00022185426,0.00015980449,0.00026448406,0.00021133709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992499,0.00012332767,0.00017729122,0.00020236589,0.0002145154,0.00003262361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007949308,0.00006831853,0.000105965264,0.000007494215,0.0010659351,0.000077952056,0.00018063193,0.000041001324,0.0006876812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044461813,0.000048667975,0.000023545748,0.00016288311,0.0008704734,0.00035050604,0.00014236702,0.000043488064,0.000048203998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002305112,0.00008712818,0.76209104,0.00024324028,0.000019547939,5.7299064e-7,0.020828284,6.537684e-7,0.003972987,0.19218221,0.016908938,0.003434902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007432186,0.00020884737,0.4446926,0.00018588414,0.00010577283,0.000001933071,0.029197609,0.00006579333,0.010218746,0.003885147,0.5103675,0.00032694812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006523518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1423406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49345854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093885494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042108346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98616517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802150874","doi":"10.22145/flr.46.1.6","title":"The Survival of Reasonableness Review: Confirming the Boundaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Standard of review; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Proportionality (law); Political science; Substantive law; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.056110595003917504,"score_gpt":0.37315237777572585,"score_spread":0.31704178277180833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802150874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019075678,0.7715436,0.000014203073,0.0828326,0.00079798454,0.0006911357,0.000004235207,0.00002955735,0.1438959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13856013,0.8462811,0.000042002615,0.0106817195,0.0006473376,0.000087727385,0.0000021926253,0.000011890729,0.0036858956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979464,0.0006882004,0.00037766513,0.00016609213,0.00050692214,0.0003147601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841285,0.00055201375,0.00021173614,0.0003854919,0.00037506418,0.00006284769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004347322,0.00011082457,0.0003354846,0.0000030556419,0.004509485,0.00027108905,0.00062299956,0.000033013217,0.00038805604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011861061,0.000056176243,0.00014571835,0.00019949932,0.0029171377,0.00017307124,0.00008419341,0.00011105434,0.00010002381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057477832,0.0000062274607,0.000048186354,0.0017970626,0.000010762605,9.113687e-7,0.00025525552,4.7718864e-9,0.0000019018737,0.91958237,0.06194291,0.01634865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022578597,0.000024487188,0.000055842083,0.010218041,0.00006092336,0.0000025315555,0.00013801272,2.9098774e-7,0.0000149728785,0.0017889163,0.98759186,0.00008155847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010041851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021029532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029777679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029486095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802823186","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Superior Court allows the enforcement of the letters rogatory issued by a US District Court to obtain evidence as regards an allegation of price-fixing of foam (Neuwirth / DeCosta)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.015181105933129246,"score_gpt":0.28090962042635015,"score_spread":0.2657285144932209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802823186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81487834,0.00043156598,0.00037364493,0.16626234,0.00038681165,0.0012156375,0.00008713982,0.000026389998,0.01633813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975266,0.00012836045,0.00020305456,0.0011932194,0.000087080785,0.000063981046,0.000007389251,0.000011147082,0.00077917706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975226,0.000622677,0.0004458899,0.00023549204,0.0008035542,0.0003697709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787724,0.0008112914,0.00025737777,0.00056412426,0.0002878703,0.0002021092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025752566,0.00013849174,0.00019899664,0.0000556199,0.0014514085,0.00009966697,0.0009626883,0.00005953661,0.000870832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014764179,0.000091329755,0.00012282543,0.00032257565,0.00066374673,0.00010786489,0.000075463395,0.0001633701,0.000030572577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032973854,0.000404669,0.018568957,0.00022860026,0.00021016492,0.0000065221298,0.06286212,0.001957025,0.019962063,0.42194346,0.47002918,0.003497513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001317597,0.00014147731,0.007351104,0.0002700409,0.000047549707,0.0000016168797,0.0061608283,0.00007460947,0.0012213723,0.00016474996,0.98429686,0.0001380213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27985674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4527229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5142677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028565637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053797837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803031062","doi":"","title":"The limits of police deception in obtaining a confession from a suspect who is neither arrested nor detained : the Canadian Supreme Court leads the way","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Confession (law); Deception; Law; Supreme court; Interrogation; Power (physics); Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Self-incrimination; Criminal procedure; Political science; Sociology; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.13040775523057196,"score_gpt":0.37581766269111194,"score_spread":0.24540990746053998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803031062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91326445,0.00051900145,0.00003517309,0.035546817,0.00025593585,0.00014387579,0.000048211867,0.0000023932646,0.050184138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986321,0.00010388631,0.000016575996,0.00017942014,0.00027213758,0.0000027904334,7.5454676e-7,0.0000044952913,0.0007878465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876475,0.0002661786,0.00030379515,0.00009508078,0.00039252447,0.00017764288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816334,0.000633425,0.0005101009,0.00014936527,0.00045610336,0.0000876678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010360697,0.00009118693,0.00017182535,0.00003936247,0.0018784668,0.0003616429,0.000821846,0.00004654256,0.000098836616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001881502,0.0000452438,0.00007356571,0.000054997705,0.00079708,0.00024209265,0.00004417489,0.00024168544,0.000010699621],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086049055,0.000096393094,0.10077561,0.000004638731,0.00031979475,0.000011040089,0.6779401,0.00006615433,0.0011992701,0.20934166,0.005156801,0.00422809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015596475,0.0003240416,0.210083,0.0008096701,0.00012844476,0.000013761859,0.34493014,0.002056868,0.0006165283,0.024772618,0.4143539,0.00035138096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27989447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87493116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5950367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011066861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019246234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803181336","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3264","title":"A Culture of Rights: Law, Literature, and Canada, by Benjamin Authers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.009691257091265358,"score_gpt":0.26827277857342174,"score_spread":0.2585815214821564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803181336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023045022,0.0038956422,0.000041346306,0.0031963575,0.000570691,0.0000995,0.00006571608,0.000017439892,0.9690683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964188,0.00016804598,0.0003671775,0.0005254279,0.00047839884,8.572248e-7,0.000002326723,0.000006289284,0.0020326993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987723,0.00012849536,0.00020602398,0.00014527823,0.00045153644,0.00029633488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992082,0.000049897655,0.00013570851,0.00009824593,0.00024132614,0.00026662927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043599433,0.00010716219,0.00016047155,0.000014945214,0.0012318222,0.00020118129,0.00024879488,0.00010505227,0.00018126803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037421625,0.0000811084,0.000044951048,0.00009086894,0.0006377722,0.00034462297,0.00002534109,0.0002444247,0.0000033359813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028007365,0.00002418665,0.00013246947,0.000011488511,0.000024982714,0.00003310165,0.011900549,2.0488712e-7,0.00044708533,0.9121669,0.07490544,0.0003256123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002752619,0.00015060669,0.00007208455,0.00026863892,0.000042366744,0.00009084605,0.0025075008,0.0000041791177,0.0013438797,0.102122374,0.89292234,0.00019990443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008782634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015895897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9474305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803500806","doi":"","title":"Privacy and Insurance in Canada, England, and France – How Does the Responsible Insurer “Put Guidelines and Procedures in Place for Retaining and Destroying Personal Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Business; Internet privacy; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03319001248784729,"score_gpt":0.2990744582008913,"score_spread":0.265884445713044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803500806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97785276,0.0015959257,0.0000072403786,0.019974347,0.00006280424,0.00033961155,0.000015833202,0.0000072774974,0.00014421761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788225,0.0007251018,0.0006720306,0.00043217445,0.000087626315,0.000039838797,9.228771e-7,0.000004764535,0.00015531112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999091,0.00007910178,0.00018894533,0.0001894411,0.00020144692,0.00025001724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991898,0.00036644712,0.00013119548,0.00011970783,0.00009632489,0.00009652303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011957596,0.00010847554,0.00015806805,0.000034350258,0.0010923381,0.0005326759,0.00015685926,0.000059359958,0.0000016457465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036824134,0.00007740745,0.000009105029,0.000053913736,0.00030810077,0.0014222394,0.0000823509,0.0001553838,1.3897866e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013744258,0.0000024943351,0.9765652,0.00012281536,0.0000031672969,0.0000030305875,0.01256459,0.0000054502343,0.000046586647,0.0030148055,0.00017279739,0.007361616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094255677,0.000030275556,0.93207955,0.00037094508,0.0000064289243,0.0000073614865,0.0068434193,0.000511503,0.00005146726,0.0011018511,0.05787576,0.00017889183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5254624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4431836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054109703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005668816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8401492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804053906","doi":"","title":"La Contribution du Juge Lebel au Droit Judiciaire et à la Tradition Civiliste (The Contribution of Justice LeBel to Procedural Law and the Civilian Legal Tradition)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Common law; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008944032260718632,"score_gpt":0.2681750354249182,"score_spread":0.25923100316419956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804053906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61380064,0.0063003185,0.016280713,0.35345975,0.0011094437,0.00096940907,0.00008972667,0.00004296525,0.007947042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119896,0.0055444976,0.0000058856635,0.001278701,0.0012072109,0.00003396698,0.000008784837,0.000019395286,0.00070258474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945,0.0021350652,0.00061740977,0.00032092177,0.0007086598,0.0017179861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970458,0.001649479,0.0004900665,0.00017770927,0.0004149068,0.00022202679],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011139908,0.00027334242,0.0004172728,0.000060618804,0.0017869013,0.00021273963,0.0004314552,0.0002387936,0.000033123928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011127657,0.00016959629,0.00025476745,0.00038491935,0.002593109,0.0012943317,0.000038655355,0.0013610495,0.000023852062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067781674,0.00011695528,0.000073028044,0.000029867506,0.00011302998,0.000007631183,0.0027205525,0.000008993042,0.00044395527,0.9867731,0.00043755156,0.008597533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057117394,0.0010214306,0.0060392036,0.0013240094,0.0016396119,0.002828427,0.016436055,0.00014771233,0.00034365998,0.86230904,0.10165792,0.0005412246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050919955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08306666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3773983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019062575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037416178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W280588165","doi":"","title":"Changer les lois, les idées, les pratiques: Réflexions sur l'échec de la réforme de la détermination de la peine (Changing Laws, Ideas and Practices: An Essay on the (Failed) Sentencing Reform)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology","score_opus":0.026759228871104834,"score_gpt":0.36418160204272637,"score_spread":0.33742237317162155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W280588165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9199918,0.021661822,0.003606053,0.044989176,0.0000957461,0.00023925783,0.0000051678476,0.00006336811,0.009347629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95298254,0.042993616,0.00048188766,0.0005576624,0.0011223295,0.000013522099,0.0000043602818,0.000031509957,0.0018125552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262077,0.003692274,0.00039176922,0.00033218862,0.0005245549,0.0024384318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683726,0.0018451742,0.0007044071,0.0001899829,0.00016682998,0.00025635827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02071774,0.0003211006,0.0002730586,0.00017580904,0.002455017,0.0007358877,0.00045885632,0.0004429564,0.00005999471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016738687,0.00024986718,0.00013582055,0.0003678038,0.0006945149,0.0015178985,0.000051554878,0.0028854162,0.0000042542824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010899914,0.00023256577,0.0023194903,0.000048079677,0.00007705382,0.000052705578,0.03922733,0.000049073064,0.0012187266,0.8573092,0.00009506489,0.099261686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007797846,0.0016884205,0.0070758024,0.0017536113,0.00057558384,0.004014481,0.33657786,0.0027840927,0.0009199079,0.59217316,0.050846465,0.0008108141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019436993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059852067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29735053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004947161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046076747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806450971","doi":"","title":"Shifting the Balance of the Oakes Test from Minimal Impairment to Proportionality of Effects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Rationality; Charter; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015274970824091922,"score_gpt":0.3144726820540078,"score_spread":0.2991977112299159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806450971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817214,0.00052381185,0.00011251546,0.01617857,0.000190431,0.00020267078,0.0000032080186,0.000004036834,0.0010633708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908555,0.00014106331,0.000061663486,0.00005636037,0.00030547826,0.0000043259693,1.2366905e-7,0.000003933561,0.00034151223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830633,0.00015433962,0.00022717424,0.00010490719,0.0004992219,0.00070801127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877286,0.00035290673,0.0004493767,0.0002642604,0.000110557405,0.00005001611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029915834,0.00006758185,0.00012926583,0.0000103388675,0.0012093829,0.00006509652,0.0008964363,0.00003248139,0.000016733607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017762281,0.000037239777,0.00010984177,0.000059661306,0.00033014704,0.00013911711,0.00008644128,0.00043523093,0.0000036333015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011359828,0.00020449708,0.75696015,0.00003555712,0.0000974589,0.0000020633129,0.008100271,0.000015914822,0.006210622,0.21633407,0.00031890752,0.011606899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024918953,0.00033164708,0.8602124,0.0002417132,0.00006387356,0.000008640618,0.0049108504,0.000011864893,0.0022064403,0.1300138,0.0016434463,0.0001061606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053203846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013604138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10325225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023481682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001495377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9301717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807580390","doi":"","title":"Robson Crim: Manitoba Law Journal Criminal Law Edition","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09740531909828255,"score_gpt":0.3711384528234904,"score_spread":0.27373313372520786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807580390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030223137,0.00006373549,0.0004186433,0.010729173,0.0022169938,0.00008344238,0.0000019031929,0.000060332255,0.9562026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99328876,0.000080865386,0.000600801,0.0010004824,0.0031104244,0.0000028595375,9.73997e-7,0.0000069441726,0.001907916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987456,0.00008501005,0.00016598211,0.00015852827,0.0004949425,0.00034990636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991565,0.00006190411,0.0001400534,0.00025711692,0.00017532338,0.00020915159],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080668856,0.000090656824,0.00011466363,0.000018187446,0.006678201,0.0013286081,0.00059381366,0.00008517648,0.0010951816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016729474,0.0000791471,0.00008768929,0.000019705814,0.0007223394,0.0015566987,0.000064791035,0.00019969192,0.00026878068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014712191,0.000028060975,0.00013613013,0.000007903568,0.0000043927566,0.000038605518,0.0012517239,5.734554e-7,0.000080111065,0.975857,0.0181258,0.0044549643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022710982,0.000106427215,0.0033551657,0.000085770065,0.0000821296,0.000050931238,0.023495749,0.000008960569,0.0009976235,0.05857135,0.9127551,0.0002637089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14335269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4184197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010089946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000646807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807640423","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Home","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05340679440478912,"score_gpt":0.3280323025176166,"score_spread":0.2746255081128275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807640423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009697886,0.0016770435,0.000026418029,0.009418868,0.0102117,0.0003867864,0.00016073536,0.00038829603,0.9776332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040655218,0.0017888661,0.00086001767,0.0037250917,0.021089438,0.000051139952,0.00013969887,0.00011007806,0.9315804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664813,0.00025129193,0.00047599172,0.00060118816,0.000878512,0.0011448555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974252,0.00034575403,0.00018558918,0.00053298107,0.00048973813,0.0010207382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014073177,0.00034796647,0.00050604215,0.000288649,0.0018296994,0.0005219471,0.0013306214,0.00083214726,0.0043844674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066779234,0.00032631462,0.00019408608,0.00037957856,0.00068712025,0.00033836014,0.000091593305,0.00037434543,0.0044974335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027055462,0.0000044262256,0.000018443749,0.00060624926,0.000022916936,0.00006191039,0.0021704594,2.0979303e-7,2.8873527e-7,0.073719725,0.92294383,0.00044882065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004407337,0.000036531084,0.000024448052,0.00063568336,0.00042456825,0.000007355754,0.017047476,0.0000054076304,0.0000017996284,0.00041364756,0.9808923,0.00046671985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97204524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073306076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013296648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00538319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807751550","doi":"","title":"LA METHODE D’INTERROGATOIRE « REID » ET LA METHODE POLICIERE D’ENQUETE « MR BIG » : LES ERREURS JUDICIAIRES ET L’ECART ENTRE LA VERITE ET LE MENSONGE","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Interrogation; Conviction; Prison; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08118404489453272,"score_gpt":0.3864088105546689,"score_spread":0.3052247656601362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807751550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015291661,0.21301156,0.00011482217,0.48074248,0.00056222815,0.00068120135,0.00014751717,0.000067563844,0.30314344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5518664,0.37421393,0.0023993067,0.057854738,0.00057209365,0.00012589693,0.000034600514,0.00013879444,0.01279424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97510296,0.022125673,0.0006060573,0.00060515536,0.0005553416,0.0010048371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449325,0.0032670987,0.00031885618,0.0008390997,0.00015275789,0.0009289272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017270999,0.0005075385,0.0009826978,0.00011349338,0.001034523,0.0003545683,0.0012298025,0.00038994834,0.0004915574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002528651,0.00042476805,0.00046201382,0.000615961,0.0015210502,0.0003694751,0.00017495135,0.0011290688,0.0002600525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056583754,0.000021050795,0.000068249,0.00092564314,0.00007100142,0.00006134151,0.008647458,0.000009557042,0.000013598803,0.6986887,0.0384677,0.25302005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001449263,0.00004565351,0.00050646736,0.008562846,0.00045094753,0.00010677925,0.0018584852,0.00003820838,0.000016011782,0.0056975065,0.9821149,0.00045723218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7452721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9173363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038429355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022556782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809064659","doi":"10.71781/1654","title":"Le contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois pénales a posteriori : essai comparé sur la protection des droits des justiciables en France et au Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05752740831395392,"score_gpt":0.3500013565660056,"score_spread":0.2924739482520517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809064659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87927073,0.0020300276,0.00043806178,0.0006457942,0.00062259735,0.00090013165,0.00013184271,0.000004649469,0.11595619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969314,0.00025545404,0.0014401437,0.000034457727,0.00020330567,0.00011061473,0.00007168805,0.000020454632,0.028549919],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997088,0.0008089125,0.00045866525,0.00054176996,0.00044316027,0.0006594512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778104,0.000600111,0.00051809876,0.00027205507,0.0005557554,0.00027294652],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018110335,0.0003606343,0.0005654902,0.000046494722,0.0040049306,0.0010486251,0.0010042511,0.00031987985,0.0003627138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001550279,0.0003959484,0.000099156125,0.00018130789,0.0024767574,0.0014677783,0.00009234016,0.0003415676,0.000048569473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010203752,0.0007797536,0.06154063,0.0036780383,0.00052785786,0.0003925566,0.2142935,0.0015335731,0.0088011,0.17905737,0.00046531897,0.52790993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017327205,0.00028362003,0.16371486,0.017241806,0.0010700619,0.00016578268,0.07733179,0.00039474835,0.015968138,0.008780421,0.7113768,0.0019392439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7109115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010446784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015351156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809394529","doi":"10.7202/1048586ar","title":"Les biens et l’immatérialité en droit civil et en common law","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026840807377282613,"score_gpt":0.3184205012095705,"score_spread":0.2915796938322879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809394529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7047556,0.0022404112,0.0016241765,0.031160828,0.002140197,0.00033578993,0.00011005936,0.00018601929,0.25744691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95474446,0.0011963082,0.0009688351,0.0046790154,0.0016925453,0.00001891585,0.000020687967,0.000051939773,0.036627304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586785,0.0014558503,0.00046382434,0.00055876694,0.00063140853,0.0010223184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973518,0.0014436956,0.00019919494,0.00047820658,0.00012658819,0.0004005191],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031742037,0.00034005882,0.00048089522,0.000079226025,0.0010822966,0.00031013653,0.0008452915,0.0008721428,0.0011702458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039312223,0.00039861872,0.00027249387,0.00043115998,0.0039940053,0.0005968811,0.0001531788,0.0009550321,0.00076291314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005559167,0.00009245212,0.00057311315,0.000084349274,0.000052557454,0.00006852127,0.076968774,0.000011694361,0.0002825674,0.90536064,0.0043204403,0.012129273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003294197,0.00030401972,0.0030190044,0.00033902924,0.00018084756,0.000053126478,0.011215771,0.00013879013,0.00058648805,0.22244066,0.76082003,0.0005728037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08360375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19855432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014282351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022933156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810134542","doi":"10.29173/alr1358","title":"Applications for Third-Party Records: The Realtionship of the O'Connor Procedure to Other Application Procedures","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Third party; Law; Production (economics); Record keeping; O'Connor; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.05719340708182324,"score_gpt":0.3521613584949219,"score_spread":0.2949679514130987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810134542","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082884316,0.05763186,0.0019804025,0.5646725,0.00023081747,0.026566308,0.000049160393,0.00010659126,0.34793347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90416545,0.017527925,0.00059240515,0.038022645,0.0006915978,0.016950475,0.000007868592,0.000045196022,0.021996463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890745,0.00012704892,0.00030826364,0.00023676618,0.00021603543,0.00020445946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843025,0.00061994273,0.00019276308,0.00051411265,0.00017512805,0.00006778431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006814,0.000098766766,0.00017961412,0.000008921707,0.0007811812,0.000030500716,0.00064275565,0.000050951745,0.000097926495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009330331,0.000055423494,0.00012961519,0.0004726756,0.00022214736,0.00009895922,0.000034178214,0.00007904826,0.00012785995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003086456,0.000046544166,0.0002589761,0.0012426043,0.000008022263,5.9142886e-9,0.0011920648,8.3795584e-7,0.000017174654,0.91772026,0.073351376,0.0061590215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029779883,0.00001388914,0.00012060676,0.0007196055,0.000079917016,0.0000010658375,0.000110714056,0.000006624622,0.000028178209,0.0046396516,0.9941696,0.00008037862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062389523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0958462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032200664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007467929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9431471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883672782","doi":"10.29173/alr2482","title":"The Prejudicial Effects of \"Reasonable Steps\" in Analysis of Mens Rea and Sexual Consent: Two Solutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Mens rea; Statutory law; Law; Plaintiff; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Statute; Excuse; Deliberation; Criminal law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04280125876061211,"score_gpt":0.36699413362238104,"score_spread":0.32419287486176895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883672782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4931862,0.30123922,0.000027572618,0.016275845,0.0004462842,0.002399685,0.00001780786,0.000023067521,0.18638432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97184896,0.02731074,0.0000205491,0.00023778618,0.000038743845,0.000016983118,0.0000016678428,0.0000031253423,0.0005214376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987582,0.00038125506,0.0002905954,0.00014876705,0.00020485274,0.0002163464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969164,0.0025650167,0.00014767089,0.00021117093,0.00010363455,0.000056121597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010838195,0.000069174865,0.00036441392,0.00002668604,0.00031827114,0.000014307458,0.00016764879,0.000029901406,0.00004939692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012549286,0.00004964275,0.000071592374,0.0006715277,0.0010263273,0.000087051056,0.00005740858,0.00004693854,0.0000064480223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016620337,0.00007067629,0.0054635806,0.0010774233,0.00026142295,0.0000014615669,0.0031286853,8.2009495e-7,0.00010017537,0.98136556,0.0022420136,0.006271567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005572186,0.00039832803,0.013013933,0.007439626,0.0066289417,0.0000031579953,0.0010440282,0.00015096378,0.0002196963,0.0032307254,0.96690834,0.00040503804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22619633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71878755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021196509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096748496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7789565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884898066","doi":"10.1007/s12207-018-9325-y","title":"Navigating the Legal System After a Motor Vehicle Collision","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Injury and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Action (physics); Legal psychology; Compensation (psychology); Class action; Settlement (finance); Remuneration; Legal action; Legal process; Business; Law; Personal injury; Function (biology); Court decision; Computer security; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04090566737379726,"score_gpt":0.39416272006527664,"score_spread":0.3532570526914794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884898066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94734484,0.00014079476,0.000021286985,0.0047846795,0.00033687026,0.00014013548,0.0000049874748,0.00006153194,0.047164906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706715,0.000018552122,0.00009447018,0.0019206136,0.00060440315,0.0000246671,2.415645e-7,0.0000030185406,0.0002668798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908286,0.00019555114,0.00012451461,0.00020481039,0.00017703058,0.00021525698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995395,0.0001580125,0.00003482608,0.00012981084,0.000047807156,0.000090044596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006701076,0.00006677983,0.00008520124,0.0000029582473,0.000940096,0.00015188828,0.00016865268,0.00008806149,0.00013588839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006829552,0.00003842331,0.00003664025,0.00010466217,0.0010277581,0.00015745613,0.00004540757,0.00019272626,0.0001056276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006628193,0.00009887982,0.0012320125,0.000019534598,0.000008189408,0.000032775166,0.005415927,8.658809e-8,0.0013853081,0.9650239,0.002517041,0.02360354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023284032,0.0011692246,0.018609853,0.00027361562,0.000031121464,0.000018991623,0.0073368894,0.00006671366,0.00034658177,0.0038354828,0.9677834,0.0002953143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011969396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031402044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96526635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017255677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051013176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7230553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885547096","doi":"","title":"Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; House of Commons; State (computer science); Law and economics; Commons; Public administration; Political science; Law; Economics; Parliament; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03544045504200584,"score_gpt":0.35412527795838145,"score_spread":0.3186848229163756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885547096","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019607414,0.5525748,0.0000042218267,0.2728183,0.00033281904,0.0020326555,0.000014467533,0.000029744266,0.1525856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37491116,0.5038444,0.0004005452,0.11825424,0.0001739096,0.00017146478,0.000009632187,0.000016650005,0.0022179976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860334,0.0006166577,0.00016632183,0.00016818111,0.00012548572,0.0003199903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998832,0.0005033006,0.000042678283,0.00013657089,0.000041888812,0.00044355798],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018764867,0.000076259195,0.0001552907,0.000048688056,0.00015938024,0.000061126644,0.000148313,0.000033347907,0.002971267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010530528,0.000069753034,0.00002479844,0.00019686809,0.00016085827,0.00056213455,0.000013619042,0.00009141099,0.00042954498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008738199,0.000032134474,0.0065567927,0.0007685809,0.000023336517,0.00013256872,0.004500247,2.1314297e-7,0.000009737237,0.0641745,0.39324278,0.53055036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003890697,0.00001222889,0.0018191515,0.0010547095,0.000027983586,0.000009633445,0.0037481093,2.533453e-7,5.122442e-7,0.0017847616,0.9913998,0.000103948674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8521123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8187518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59815705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023941528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037090926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885549935","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v50i2.2026","title":"Cases of Mistaken Identity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07238438431476989,"score_gpt":0.3793907287514035,"score_spread":0.3070063444366336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885549935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96783113,0.00083190313,0.000010906715,0.017026322,0.0013296864,0.000072405426,0.00000961879,0.0000029037246,0.012885128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983898,0.0000517345,0.000033234002,0.00025991173,0.0009309905,2.8793679e-7,1.3137686e-7,0.0000045088077,0.000329446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990986,0.00009560679,0.00021985265,0.00005139459,0.0003010643,0.00023346153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875367,0.0000985889,0.00020423761,0.00008952398,0.00046905488,0.00038490165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092977803,0.00005515117,0.00010985734,0.000060677627,0.0006129652,0.00009592484,0.0005776998,0.00001688701,0.00079834776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052263594,0.0000408736,0.000090883324,0.00018032119,0.0010221341,0.00054842024,0.000010600297,0.00012708196,0.000033174918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002646768,0.00020126233,0.13475733,0.000084662825,0.00037190306,0.0020772077,0.19027765,0.00001397832,0.001042718,0.13004321,0.51221114,0.028654246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004892001,0.0006223879,0.013307048,0.00012844423,0.00017216985,0.000104901366,0.009857262,0.0000051154007,0.002702125,0.010683476,0.9616919,0.00023595201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3046685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6132308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44948074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011868935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015567252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8741348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885640677","doi":"10.29173/alr1357","title":"The Frayed and Tarnished Silver Thread: Stinchcome and the Role of Crown Counsel in Alberta","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Charter; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.017170421928131153,"score_gpt":0.2755454357642354,"score_spread":0.25837501383610423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885640677","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034717612,0.68545115,5.6230664e-7,0.057674866,0.00010943001,0.0014747009,0.000002107761,0.000009977284,0.22055958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74870294,0.24686028,0.000009919269,0.0013923008,0.000033599088,0.000050537637,5.812164e-7,0.000006850906,0.0029429898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858683,0.0003730749,0.00033181344,0.00020074888,0.0002533095,0.00025421914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959049,0.0035591982,0.00013211432,0.00028178943,0.00005093239,0.00007102249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012622863,0.00011967488,0.0003468542,0.000008041886,0.00047583884,0.00007886423,0.00031345536,0.000052454972,0.00027458338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007998914,0.00006418556,0.00006497418,0.0001818154,0.0012419019,0.00018164549,0.00006067881,0.0001321011,0.000029675413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002884953,0.000027046013,0.0020863144,0.00023293482,0.000018618657,9.106916e-7,0.0050394624,1.6403372e-7,0.0000041205217,0.9722767,0.0016593529,0.018625548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023971104,0.000019637457,0.00041676802,0.00072393083,0.000071945564,0.000003680331,0.00023984474,0.000028004011,0.0000034856103,0.00787198,0.9902809,0.00010007748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22978893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41225556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012886626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001934052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77533996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885956722","doi":"","title":"The Metis and \"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms\"","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Charter; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01032829162902723,"score_gpt":0.252300894622472,"score_spread":0.24197260299344478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885956722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6516831,0.0016506752,0.000023957864,0.014290352,0.00019272868,0.00026349534,0.000009632103,0.000014827614,0.33187127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976591,0.00023856151,0.00006833452,0.00012033121,0.000033561115,0.0000016537558,3.0340516e-7,0.0000027331253,0.0018754117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909973,0.00038393892,0.000056908426,0.000099852696,0.00014331215,0.000216281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989987,0.0006592403,0.000038939143,0.000108592525,0.00003861068,0.00015589582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010225653,0.000055280463,0.00009312491,0.000039757746,0.0012836531,0.00010881026,0.00015400107,0.00007029927,0.00006976539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015285448,0.00003708093,0.000029830395,0.00013046124,0.0018100489,0.00012212229,0.00001505085,0.00008794525,0.000004597211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015232174,0.000002722376,0.0011896134,0.0000024236433,0.000012827731,0.000010381129,0.014974707,3.3388352e-7,0.000009403974,0.97901344,0.0035334867,0.00123542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053573336,0.000018730181,0.0134319905,0.000013458053,0.000051916126,0.0000073137107,0.006798879,0.000020926187,0.000031327338,0.061167996,0.91782385,0.00009788261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61715406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89400655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9178454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055704157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019391949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98729515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887056903","doi":"","title":"Vie Privee et \"Droit a L'oubli\": Que Fait le Canada?","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art; Sociology; Humanities","score_opus":0.045413038349509056,"score_gpt":0.25905743631765304,"score_spread":0.213644397968144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887056903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13077062,0.0094745355,0.0038490032,0.41397145,0.003824519,0.0002783267,0.000027377177,0.000042728796,0.43776143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098104,0.0011682517,0.0023338157,0.0010254815,0.0006222372,1.0117314e-8,0.000002331183,0.000014519293,0.08502295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977241,0.00035821515,0.00025436745,0.00023280925,0.0008970491,0.00053344195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976484,0.00010094448,0.00036480348,0.00018599286,0.0004699446,0.0012299077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094057946,0.00017781316,0.0003455065,0.00006233591,0.0009913467,0.000093891984,0.00081647956,0.0001720671,0.000692827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107745574,0.00022782682,0.00017963762,0.00032188537,0.0007867426,0.0012169827,0.0001529722,0.00056589773,0.000057853238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106003106,0.000087515094,0.00065796636,0.000026052801,0.00006870033,0.00047711522,0.010388783,0.000159,0.000010607166,0.739907,0.24511777,0.0029934354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009201466,0.00014957442,0.0010485454,0.00023062756,0.000110492176,0.00017952413,0.031007757,0.000034089866,0.000019962099,0.008175415,0.95788485,0.00023903677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99567175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99904764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7790398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010508888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031161021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889040298","doi":"","title":"The difficult application of canadian criminal law in Nunavut","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publications Doc Du Juriste","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.024395689549291666,"score_gpt":0.30194487752733923,"score_spread":0.27754918797804756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889040298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099367864,0.0003845787,0.0002509779,0.29141697,0.00012876543,0.0006443258,0.000017457536,0.00007902089,0.60771006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833316,0.0001779694,0.000142,0.00040543487,0.00009717378,0.00006333431,0.000009864431,0.000003084047,0.0007679687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.00007667704,0.00023036421,0.00015285262,0.00021753619,0.0002734648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990379,0.00014196271,0.000087455795,0.0002965513,0.0002808255,0.00015528283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064867846,0.00005972559,0.000076954195,0.0001689724,0.00078901806,0.00013673201,0.00046969103,0.00005244134,0.00002183425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029094267,0.000049978302,0.00003448758,0.0011762842,0.00027538266,0.00026281615,0.000011281977,0.00008749529,0.00003568745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002527861,0.000035616602,0.0014175833,0.000002152069,0.0000012353715,1.8203178e-7,0.002373616,0.0000038744197,0.000038699127,0.98421085,0.0037579318,0.008155735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047215515,0.000011103758,0.11252274,0.000005592766,0.000009018093,8.7405823e-7,0.0013845705,0.000047819587,0.00002420084,0.0055280086,0.88035387,0.000064985164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40096816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.879025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001630087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032669547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6068569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890214374","doi":"","title":"Tranchemontagne and the Administration of Rights: Lessons from the Game of Jurisdiction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Administration (probate law); Human rights; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.0608751866163732,"score_gpt":0.29428738140437,"score_spread":0.2334121947879968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890214374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710785,0.0001453119,0.0020261253,0.02545967,0.00011439482,0.00021540315,0.00009043891,0.000015794938,0.00085437036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602586,0.00017383133,0.00021730605,0.0000139382255,0.00009303469,1.6467774e-7,0.000003753036,0.0000030610252,0.003469028],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990026,0.00016592508,0.00016979846,0.00017757413,0.00032677548,0.00015736923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989062,0.0004024161,0.0002859396,0.00022474704,0.000087983724,0.00009269254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041229898,0.00009059963,0.00022419245,0.000031655884,0.00027747563,0.000013438571,0.0003659266,0.00013674179,0.00025901772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006186856,0.000058388916,0.00012233097,0.00017076015,0.0015808552,0.00023283131,0.00003459206,0.00010309702,0.000005096645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006664915,0.00032937617,0.02382383,0.00012686977,0.0004868798,0.0000262159,0.5650654,0.000031737465,0.0043226713,0.34020603,0.029625326,0.029290749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012450973,0.00069868605,0.44459495,0.0024983876,0.0023187604,0.0000106401485,0.28215626,0.00008285627,0.0044738534,0.09838558,0.15129457,0.0010344657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04871533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02597989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42077112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031530326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012924758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99179345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289046656","doi":"","title":"Is Discretion the Last Refuge of Scoundrels? A Comment on Criminal Lawyers' Assn v. Ontario (Ministry of Public Safety and Security)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Statute; Judicial discretion; Statutory law; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03447309103902768,"score_gpt":0.2895659932702547,"score_spread":0.255092902231227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289046656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8801843,0.00012468027,0.00018552424,0.029192764,0.000054446835,0.00015308507,0.000014836178,0.000010926464,0.09007943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997848,0.00022018148,0.00010657339,0.0001375062,0.000014663833,5.1224664e-8,0.0000020782131,0.0000018534162,0.0016691452],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991088,0.00011878228,0.000095700765,0.00014816907,0.00036611396,0.0001624475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993559,0.000084170104,0.00018433326,0.00018872389,0.00010448598,0.00008237745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047111104,0.000078104036,0.00018650792,0.000020566802,0.0003608055,0.000016163138,0.00027825692,0.00007421661,0.0021419893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024150826,0.00007663289,0.000079558406,0.000056929926,0.00052213203,0.00038275807,0.000048267397,0.000094799645,0.0000015434191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009564369,0.0005499653,0.006398347,0.00013884425,0.00008949085,0.000009075187,0.5662793,0.0000037249963,0.00027280196,0.40233788,0.0018754564,0.021088704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008592225,0.0012702688,0.5710898,0.00028771328,0.00023481809,0.0000022256627,0.25006965,0.000038007252,0.00015625317,0.0007299669,0.1749964,0.00026565258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5909791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80768734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5646915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003409948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015376242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890655603","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2018.1467155","title":"The Process is the Punishment: Criminal Libel and Political Speech in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication Law and Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Punishment (psychology); Charter; Political science; Harassment; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.036144650582995236,"score_gpt":0.3686513146431431,"score_spread":0.33250666406014784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890655603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3650695,0.0011990735,8.308338e-7,0.39042932,0.000036428093,0.00016284635,0.0000048113043,0.000009684394,0.24308752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973554,0.00082075666,0.00001732993,0.008929923,0.00012669455,0.000009482857,6.443128e-7,0.0000026591006,0.00035695487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924356,0.00017741765,0.000110054854,0.00007814563,0.0001494505,0.00024134941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917775,0.00032822601,0.000031361255,0.00030117226,0.00006969008,0.0000918189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044266932,0.000050686307,0.000054724882,0.000010849108,0.0015364623,0.00013517414,0.00042448434,0.000034849076,0.0000121855155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013989302,0.000032153566,0.000008118073,0.00012110268,0.0013315489,0.000110689434,0.000108865795,0.0001473138,0.0000029659313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052852492,0.0000045744914,0.00079532404,0.0000050611834,0.0000015263726,1.8013361e-7,0.0102345925,1.3738391e-8,0.0000012068666,0.98350245,0.001139541,0.0043102456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009774252,0.000020719526,0.008936669,0.00003614101,0.000011915445,0.0000059459353,0.026170414,0.000038178146,0.00010311847,0.07585124,0.8886385,0.000089441295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97374195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9861029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9076512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010303591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006975258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890863487","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3238229","title":"The Ultimate Creation Story: The Confidential Informant as a Creation of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Law; Psychology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.013776674539029626,"score_gpt":0.32994792575610127,"score_spread":0.3161712512170716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890863487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6958681,0.0021678645,0.002385726,0.031555016,0.0010813721,0.00046671816,0.0000018427475,0.000047282163,0.26642612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937166,0.0024457593,0.000006074576,0.00010144163,0.0006057694,0.0000031604616,6.50445e-7,0.0000043201376,0.003116214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829865,0.00021023043,0.00018866612,0.00006428184,0.00043642343,0.0008017785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991929,0.0001757968,0.00022136942,0.00010929758,0.00026012686,0.00004052022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043472955,0.00006141804,0.000073067866,0.000020954247,0.002530658,0.00016008648,0.00034761117,0.00004255309,0.00006187114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002541701,0.000035052777,0.000065777065,0.00009517302,0.0007845343,0.00036243492,0.000020012987,0.00048444569,0.00006218353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007859808,0.0000075289104,0.0000680625,0.0000010943835,0.000026853453,1.697615e-7,0.0072478843,0.000002830891,0.00013291823,0.9806952,0.00025761864,0.011481252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003670178,0.00062631647,0.00066022045,0.00004394356,0.00010665383,0.00010437985,0.048082672,0.000106609834,0.00080944,0.3533828,0.5955723,0.00013765726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072657405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059477005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6273124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015006942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891052014","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198788478.003.0006","title":"Unfit to Stand Trial Canadian Law and Practice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Political science; Disposition; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.059211813782948985,"score_gpt":0.29887481071117705,"score_spread":0.23966299692822807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891052014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059299975,0.00005321463,0.000018318926,0.000669307,0.0004033609,0.00068563374,0.00010603695,0.000042592415,0.99796224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00053582835,0.00014929935,0.00022107153,0.00062005664,0.0005782015,8.500943e-7,0.0000056004037,0.000014752107,0.9978743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998546,0.00021664645,0.00010451853,0.00037142876,0.00035868632,0.0004026981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983221,0.00039369432,0.00010504395,0.00024645356,0.00022826846,0.0007044172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005960155,0.00017388843,0.00022834651,0.0001055966,0.0010848144,0.00017880362,0.00045193944,0.0003372934,0.00005417651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019768804,0.00021207197,0.00006145252,0.000018381394,0.0006168045,0.00025101376,0.0001591909,0.00022993096,0.0000044188782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002680823,0.000004426301,1.8027798e-7,0.000020194495,0.000032253076,0.000108762455,0.0038299728,1.278921e-7,2.6210407e-7,0.8788054,0.113775104,0.0007424715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342426,0.00018330208,4.2776682e-7,0.00009760797,0.00017836316,0.0000025433858,0.0012700409,2.390907e-7,0.000001223139,0.00068031705,0.9959888,0.00025470307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44001317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70054865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8822137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000743238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020367268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8648044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891524381","doi":"10.29173/alr1361","title":"Charter Roadblocks to Defence Disclosure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Silence; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05359206156690044,"score_gpt":0.3294825560525907,"score_spread":0.27589049448569025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891524381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021689588,0.07131873,0.000014710153,0.14171387,0.0003331948,0.00076824997,0.000002384387,0.000051330553,0.7836286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88030744,0.0478143,0.00013087632,0.027396565,0.00035203417,0.0000973193,0.0000019024435,0.000017588422,0.04388196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986787,0.00013691427,0.00022713559,0.0002736635,0.00032222166,0.00036139798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991077,0.00019643169,0.000050507595,0.00033526355,0.00005700787,0.00025306141],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037461004,0.000121110854,0.0002511765,0.000011233309,0.00036375434,0.000061821724,0.00040128606,0.00004725905,0.005323949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035344352,0.0000994891,0.000117345495,0.00028162514,0.00012959818,0.00023624915,0.000049919377,0.00008960944,0.0052549825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002397975,0.00007420856,0.0006897684,0.0006436405,0.000015277816,0.000012005332,0.004958995,3.9312462e-7,0.000014230936,0.6581133,0.29290953,0.04256622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024503997,0.000022554032,0.00007031929,0.0015989628,0.00004122599,0.0000032592745,0.000036713813,0.0000013552127,0.000005825424,0.0001764636,0.9978647,0.00015406826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019066138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048229776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8781385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032709297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013921075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892157663","doi":"","title":"Taking One Step Forward, Preventing Two Steps Back: Applying Criminal Lawyers’ Association to Invalidate Extreme Legislative Restrictions on Access to Government Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Legislation; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Democracy; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.07750818150812522,"score_gpt":0.35504727522910645,"score_spread":0.27753909372098123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892157663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56927645,0.00012458312,0.21755227,0.020016156,0.0029383025,0.0028935485,0.000029283316,0.00016078641,0.18700865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946249,0.000158024,0.00085142656,0.0007084841,0.001681896,0.000045871977,0.0000026847238,0.000014123752,0.00191258],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568224,0.00029311466,0.00047680148,0.0002272132,0.0014768349,0.0018437748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841183,0.00019464553,0.00066329405,0.00014904104,0.00035628513,0.00022490829],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004611349,0.00016722117,0.00019201192,0.00015811663,0.0017200212,0.00080270064,0.00052013266,0.00008053879,0.00014129502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011739011,0.00017633698,0.00009846536,0.0005961396,0.00003841494,0.0024445795,0.00013396193,0.00081882457,0.00032487142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009063271,0.00031972516,0.017319074,0.000048625527,0.00054190046,0.000002992672,0.07055949,0.0012100557,0.0013165921,0.39558166,0.0093934955,0.50280005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034215716,0.0047595585,0.023659294,0.0016778485,0.0010226123,0.00005044786,0.17712073,0.00082434184,0.0023660765,0.046580255,0.7362455,0.00227177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004211298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043719307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.726852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006460017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000966736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894116523","doi":"","title":"Making the Mandela Rules: Evidence, Expertise, and Politics in the Development of Soft Law International Prison Standards","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Normative; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Soft law; Politics; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.056673119231982004,"score_gpt":0.3876219887162333,"score_spread":0.33094886948425134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894116523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474909,0.007015627,0.00814799,0.018718785,0.00046273548,0.0002355443,0.0000026354642,0.000012940893,0.017912872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978311,0.0011057871,0.00020812791,0.00022568792,0.00042990065,0.0000038420862,1.7281745e-7,0.0000043043233,0.00019106371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792916,0.00019110464,0.00026485827,0.00010023464,0.00073108193,0.00078354974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994106,0.00019788354,0.000120664816,0.0000806758,0.00016167844,0.000028489767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060530915,0.000070429945,0.00008495189,0.000040341976,0.00080137263,0.00012759985,0.0005069082,0.00003964645,0.00003114303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026762194,0.000041893683,0.000031626227,0.000095965064,0.0004577756,0.00025954345,0.000049791597,0.00047070003,0.000002475823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036861282,0.000019584602,0.0018322874,0.000004191178,0.000022725573,0.0000011166427,0.056662947,8.225848e-7,0.000017138158,0.9255228,0.00014523363,0.015734263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004877096,0.00035844347,0.0054954966,0.0007628609,0.00004882145,0.00014683067,0.18179134,0.00010552657,0.0001486355,0.47218284,0.33817443,0.00029707456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005384139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034496404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007994754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023884266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9831215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894989073","doi":"10.4324/9780203597286-7","title":"Wrongful Convictions and Miscarriages of Justice in Comparative Perspective: Preface and Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Extant taxon; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04080265859918631,"score_gpt":0.3686743012718951,"score_spread":0.3278716426727088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894989073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94800425,0.0004244403,0.00006663085,0.01555412,0.000100463614,0.00020751575,9.3592064e-7,0.000013544062,0.035628106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766403,0.00018023449,0.00030097974,0.00001804365,0.000105850704,0.000007677799,1.9604117e-7,0.0000011604257,0.0017218143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995561,0.00007416584,0.000079813806,0.00012643357,0.00007898372,0.00008446372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965686,0.000118661075,0.000027244692,0.00004341555,0.00011238264,0.00004144155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015725687,0.00003934697,0.00008765671,0.000031501062,0.00013317533,0.000031193424,0.00003239089,0.00002635645,0.00028572566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010925872,0.000034878965,0.00000730126,0.000091839254,0.00034563112,0.0003052273,0.000016415788,0.000049230468,0.000006868237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003268002,0.00010201915,0.017673109,0.00006726201,0.000020310945,5.1220167e-7,0.19466008,0.000029626332,0.0047526984,0.7660599,0.0154568,0.0011450532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026251687,0.000103296465,0.2255534,0.000025971744,0.00005999359,0.000003137186,0.7512538,0.00023036808,0.00090935384,0.007301001,0.014150904,0.00014626911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02730494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009143289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75875884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031218995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020904741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97917235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895749759","doi":"","title":"Location Tracking by Police: The Regulation of ‘Tireless and Absolute Surveillance’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Seriousness; Context (archaeology); Internet privacy; Tracking (education); Phone; Anonymity; License; Secrecy; Computer security; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.03911756228731976,"score_gpt":0.3556573052824298,"score_spread":0.31653974299511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895749759","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14932753,0.6472947,0.00059557473,0.1017171,0.0008273841,0.0024672952,0.00002321201,0.0001758924,0.097571336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973919,0.02473448,0.000032044416,0.00082641555,0.0002117934,0.000005977449,0.000003403712,0.0000044809913,0.00026242295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991621,0.00017631236,0.00020714352,0.00011904386,0.00020612724,0.00012930328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932814,0.000117832155,0.00013749358,0.00017060283,0.00021007341,0.000035858546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012274652,0.00005957571,0.00015620832,0.000006671682,0.00030764556,0.000029205465,0.0001498153,0.000031793777,0.000116431656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011406112,0.00004180653,0.000027969229,0.00022622845,0.0004317193,0.00015096825,0.000023210489,0.00004034209,0.000016051443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021281832,0.00004618904,0.0009779164,0.0037739887,0.000021357053,2.4223735e-7,0.005548866,7.463969e-7,0.00089134293,0.7781016,0.04531926,0.16529717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005829572,0.000036586367,0.009939213,0.0019543008,0.000034817956,0.0000022966708,0.00013220613,0.00002501092,0.00014452629,0.00074064906,0.9868285,0.00010357938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015490247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013069734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94150925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019658397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029797604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895755850","doi":"","title":"Regulating Unreliable Evidence: Can Evidence Rules Guide Juries and Prevent Wrongful Convictions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1058909358999378,"score_gpt":0.3692711919033421,"score_spread":0.2633802560034043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895755850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9141952,0.008306091,0.00048350563,0.03485043,0.0005252395,0.0005508968,0.0000051561296,0.00031213873,0.040771358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459955,0.005917627,0.0031387599,0.0002954072,0.00023593531,0.000029016153,8.0221497e-7,0.000009791472,0.04437713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981584,0.00018311107,0.00033416075,0.00036461747,0.0005354225,0.0004242711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980675,0.0011540552,0.000102754464,0.00025169525,0.00020309148,0.00022092494],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010269523,0.00014354491,0.00019516733,0.000054915385,0.002027747,0.00013362928,0.00026310692,0.000087755,0.0004051979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023671065,0.00013086008,0.00006086482,0.00023105268,0.0008699171,0.0010424685,0.000110822315,0.00012458432,0.000053926564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013080829,0.00024083332,0.21695822,0.00042262985,0.00010644226,0.00010645156,0.12344677,0.0003052539,0.003418411,0.38475835,0.2512126,0.018893221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004672236,0.00056375057,0.12616684,0.006618168,0.00032304192,0.00022477399,0.05101916,0.0006756967,0.006324417,0.01763338,0.7880532,0.0019303231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040547892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014742929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5368406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014381389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004847459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895999949","doi":"10.29173/alr2496","title":"The Shopkeeper’s Privilege and Canadian Tort Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Privilege (computing); Jurisprudence; Corporation; Economic Justice; Political science; Liability; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03065830103122638,"score_gpt":0.32994579063932195,"score_spread":0.2992874896080956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895999949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010103773,0.054879118,3.80184e-7,0.06554739,0.00033055997,0.00038636726,0.0000021392402,0.000012022893,0.87783164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885273,0.0765958,0.000026575475,0.024745002,0.0005050478,0.000032308715,0.0000017250097,0.000011182818,0.009555093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989986,0.00012894902,0.00015774801,0.00017746672,0.0001765515,0.00036069495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998992,0.00033841195,0.00003762482,0.0002641607,0.00007711299,0.00029064095],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077903795,0.00008479153,0.0001471611,0.000005235257,0.0016652048,0.000117237985,0.00030444586,0.00004351998,0.00042959527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027752577,0.00005708476,0.000046845194,0.00011140771,0.0009697689,0.00018304378,0.000036530746,0.000067770656,0.0003657353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2255094e-7,0.0000019055647,0.00012330907,0.000058826212,0.0000044496346,0.0000013789373,0.00040571668,8.754835e-10,4.5044584e-7,0.97502583,0.01819548,0.006182047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016315049,0.000017483497,0.000097397075,0.0005366308,0.000033023683,0.000003817313,0.00004987918,3.4508642e-7,0.0000026026182,0.0010905265,0.9980635,0.00008846165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.948226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97986805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005539031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017365356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896023821","doi":"","title":"L’agent civil d’infiltration dans le cadre d’enquête au Québec : le portrait de son utilisation et de ses problématiques","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Portrait; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.013815500792014171,"score_gpt":0.2240008809335619,"score_spread":0.21018538014154775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896023821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8576851,0.0036012789,0.005977306,0.020212213,0.0006493076,0.0003636979,0.000029570583,0.00014166562,0.1113399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592106,0.00032093216,0.0011754414,0.00034375655,0.0005760783,0.000019877149,0.000023699198,0.000017680533,0.03831196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747604,0.0005519248,0.00034053437,0.00044998375,0.0005655815,0.000615952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864256,0.00014163867,0.0002973556,0.00024729825,0.00028767186,0.0003834836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009123742,0.00026780585,0.00023249343,0.00010326219,0.00977124,0.00011749042,0.00035586013,0.0003045641,0.00008884569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001464043,0.00032977387,0.00019756267,0.00030175844,0.0014869946,0.0013414526,0.00010985381,0.00025800744,0.000047102785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022527888,0.00035294396,0.05086375,0.00013450522,0.00012032363,0.00039586006,0.46090248,0.001216422,0.024663238,0.45361748,0.003502692,0.0040050354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008286118,0.00041669802,0.19970748,0.0006157267,0.00037335858,0.0009023317,0.1943085,0.0030388888,0.037244704,0.0038500365,0.55783796,0.0008756835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93516725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9076171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5543353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012481067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021602498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896136361","doi":"","title":"Engagement with Human Rights by Administrative Decision-Makers: A Transformative Opportunity to Build a More Grassroots Human Rights Culture","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Human rights; Discretion; Jurisprudence; Political science; International human rights law; Charter; Redress; Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.044220014575189266,"score_gpt":0.3883270531728037,"score_spread":0.34410703859761443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896136361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542979,0.0002465818,0.0034052688,0.0069231265,0.00015679891,0.00084173173,0.000028619817,0.00006657997,0.03403338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955426,0.000088740606,0.00019781078,0.00011916551,0.00028766165,0.0000270372,0.000008231186,0.00001487641,0.0037138935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957133,0.0003109162,0.00041083925,0.00038317006,0.0010524015,0.0021293825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980109,0.00008625261,0.00039698926,0.00038826236,0.0003119266,0.000805715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002722413,0.00032167023,0.00035110067,0.00009328041,0.015454134,0.0006852,0.0011968556,0.00014479097,0.00021467992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013083892,0.00022176781,0.00016114264,0.00013784613,0.00050882925,0.001211162,0.000052402484,0.002031866,0.000022406924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045974087,0.0004898018,0.00047423743,0.0000128409865,0.00043438104,0.00015681083,0.06437151,0.0000044420217,0.00055824965,0.91338,0.014584482,0.005073469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017369988,0.0037260843,0.000953959,0.0005442061,0.00024188038,0.0001509773,0.042381983,0.0000020757257,0.0007778248,0.562701,0.38587782,0.00090520666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007607479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32775617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37129334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001136819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017197841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896164668","doi":"10.29173/alr2494","title":"Consent Searches for Electronic Text Communications: Escaping the Zero-Sum Trap","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Dissenting opinion; Communication source; Supreme court; Adjudication; Law; Doctrine; Charter; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Internet privacy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.17285005703172263,"score_gpt":0.42596920399767624,"score_spread":0.2531191469659536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896164668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000676466,0.4389888,0.00033841078,0.3263477,0.00024129263,0.0029008272,0.0000039733077,0.000056079476,0.23044644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7002497,0.2845917,0.00024961235,0.010732893,0.00024329589,0.0002722509,0.0000064995806,0.000014053575,0.0036400135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853784,0.0004541315,0.0002361641,0.00017248969,0.00018854128,0.00041086218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959865,0.0030321293,0.00008746827,0.00067822356,0.0001465388,0.000069104346],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019076399,0.00009321015,0.00019422939,0.000008143614,0.0013865929,0.000077781406,0.0009298943,0.000038226353,0.00020449958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010289376,0.00006427108,0.00013334517,0.00018932745,0.0012245807,0.00014362366,0.00008425709,0.000126008,0.00028929408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036901538,0.000018104107,0.000015480618,0.00026166398,0.000017039796,4.7655963e-8,0.001260843,1.590172e-8,0.000012064387,0.9635388,0.019865517,0.015006725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004599406,0.00004707266,0.000010208213,0.0012506415,0.000077688404,0.0000019257145,0.00020590647,0.000013013945,0.000022214886,0.0068409205,0.99139345,0.00009095647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02328524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19113663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97152793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007157677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027768503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896576887","doi":"10.7939/r3z31p331","title":"Punting terrorists, assassins and other undesirables: Canada, the Human Rights Committee and requests for interim measures of protection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Human rights; Treaty; Law; Political science; Faith; International human rights law","score_opus":0.05500992013052437,"score_gpt":0.2500364854403857,"score_spread":0.19502656530986134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896576887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9473375,0.00009417896,0.00010850142,0.0026312703,0.00004409724,0.00025228324,0.0000037836385,0.000008293236,0.049520086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615395,0.000005625241,0.00020983437,0.000037866314,0.000011674406,1.8145991e-7,6.085484e-7,0.0000030065978,0.0035772237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995459,0.00011894439,0.00006395433,0.000091036585,0.00009229049,0.000087909946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996355,0.00016019186,0.00007925918,0.000069382484,0.000019985784,0.000035677844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015708797,0.000045734487,0.00008648637,0.000022229922,0.00059885695,0.000019406501,0.00011031804,0.000036579448,0.00003485507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037396723,0.000039292867,0.00001868989,0.00005355308,0.00029750203,0.00031235933,0.000022885346,0.00004395694,7.9353654e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015820602,0.00010647057,0.1048425,0.0003783862,0.00012628507,0.0000052972737,0.08740129,0.0000034778932,0.0012678723,0.7820589,0.02186672,0.0017845928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030548018,0.00009467077,0.009626771,0.00021391471,0.000051908617,0.0000019105312,0.022333238,0.00001581661,0.0017707576,0.0071615763,0.9582785,0.00014546815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84210545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9396462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93641174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019194074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115521885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4605984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896922696","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Wills Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08282866817183414,"score_gpt":0.32400769154687636,"score_spread":0.2411790233750422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896922696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13048398,0.000088642446,0.0005537783,0.004781806,0.00012560887,0.00008967499,1.5064943e-7,0.00007267584,0.8638037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95628947,0.000057492118,0.0032989832,0.0001579715,0.000091621696,2.8726464e-7,1.8434552e-7,0.0000021398114,0.040101852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996174,0.000022055598,0.000053616655,0.000085068874,0.00010026593,0.00012160675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00004680364,0.000016217664,0.00007041259,0.000019252444,0.00013416515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013961481,0.000032899614,0.00004260427,0.000014495074,0.0002141523,0.000032526932,0.00007455201,0.00003216156,0.0018287756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007288172,0.000028085786,0.0000144011,0.0000708792,0.0000792486,0.00028237875,0.000017596092,0.000026072199,0.000079477846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056371873,0.000009492712,0.015271469,0.000002137182,0.0000031683296,0.0000013961325,0.017450286,9.563529e-8,0.000046139532,0.94032675,0.012812018,0.014071403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009446493,0.00003656794,0.3802258,0.000019105313,0.000018823313,0.0000017481983,0.0031166573,0.0000041871863,0.00036402346,0.024451908,0.5915263,0.00014038463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07027903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065573506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91587484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010300999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022165524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897396376","doi":"","title":"The Canada's Federal Court calls for tougher criminal sentences for infringing cartel criminal offences (Maxzone)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Law; Political science; Criminal court; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Federal court; Criminology; Business; Supreme court; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.039565808969672225,"score_gpt":0.30735111394980597,"score_spread":0.26778530498013375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897396376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3772819,0.0062981565,0.016076604,0.46288672,0.013589886,0.005315534,0.00062813575,0.00046487147,0.11745818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811491,0.00010867397,0.0048138034,0.0010898751,0.0020036146,0.00042746932,0.000021473184,0.000021252681,0.010364756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977668,0.00012408476,0.00033242404,0.00026553762,0.00052631844,0.000984835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975831,0.0015337672,0.0001307938,0.00018942516,0.00030002062,0.0002629056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012267547,0.00019221194,0.00020879912,0.000038238843,0.004458388,0.00030224398,0.0004624729,0.00007448313,0.0006555299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062790903,0.0001569274,0.00015791779,0.000107621716,0.00045121537,0.00015964713,0.000047311143,0.00014707007,0.00004937343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001703715,0.0001769939,0.0025312519,0.00018659665,0.00006804991,0.000005709582,0.014319526,0.000036682482,0.00011904016,0.30330926,0.6747912,0.004285295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017788814,0.00005194051,0.0025214413,0.000075082644,0.00008698395,0.000007831334,0.03654146,0.000023679742,0.00010272916,0.00049829535,0.9596753,0.00023735713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30151197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51987123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002289084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006038965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W289751062","doi":"","title":"Re-Evaluating Independence: The Emerging Problem of Crown-Police Alignment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Law; Warrant; Legislature; Accountability; Criminal procedure; Business","score_opus":0.04335142690477112,"score_gpt":0.3744433845908143,"score_spread":0.33109195768604316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W289751062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94911695,0.0072470703,0.001614001,0.0109544415,0.0004689418,0.0003753511,8.010937e-7,0.000035026802,0.030187428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956697,0.0017910152,0.00018358238,0.00010280251,0.0007607357,0.000006705648,1.9583995e-7,0.000009336673,0.0014759117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602085,0.000396787,0.00031252782,0.000107371176,0.0009942057,0.0021682626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991515,0.00017339358,0.0002877648,0.00013177653,0.00014337077,0.000112154776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013794032,0.000097711774,0.00012851146,0.00004499516,0.0010101268,0.00005869939,0.0004793492,0.00006505561,0.00012458426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015522071,0.000068748755,0.00009615509,0.00023303207,0.0001584285,0.000465856,0.000057054214,0.0010293116,0.000020570273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006668727,0.00011712654,0.026778849,0.00002101405,0.00012730178,5.5778554e-7,0.10323257,0.00009080666,0.0013759703,0.814203,0.00058907625,0.05339699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066559704,0.0006261175,0.00313635,0.00025428427,0.00030143702,0.00015279837,0.68886876,0.00006279234,0.0015018515,0.2516455,0.052219674,0.0005648442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005511204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01403737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5856362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005296735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018250741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83313286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897844261","doi":"10.7202/1052480ar","title":"L’intoxication en contexte suicidaire et les deux sens de l’acte volontaire en droit criminel canadien : une critique de l’arrêt R. c. Turcotte","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01965018544779788,"score_gpt":0.30140028978773575,"score_spread":0.28175010433993786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897844261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90455115,0.0018803034,0.008648402,0.06937019,0.00057626935,0.0003895173,0.000094829345,0.00016126118,0.014328092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598987,0.0011184962,0.0016118737,0.0037347865,0.0014919642,0.000049036546,0.000028715445,0.00007321656,0.031993195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525476,0.0013020122,0.0005340228,0.00072873774,0.0004758246,0.0017046701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968515,0.0011887777,0.00024916374,0.0005219485,0.00034442998,0.0008441869],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028984859,0.00044968625,0.0005094247,0.00013711187,0.0014745614,0.00021708776,0.00085925125,0.0012095956,0.00024361708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018675016,0.0005631111,0.00025651907,0.00049726735,0.002561614,0.000615921,0.000088582565,0.0012103874,0.00012941833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017652771,0.00016528668,0.016276803,0.0003402183,0.00016794987,0.0004940849,0.24465293,0.000065385255,0.0062103034,0.6648572,0.011567801,0.055025496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015002562,0.0012407816,0.21984436,0.0018446351,0.001440527,0.001177205,0.14235675,0.003569471,0.01181508,0.19289704,0.41933104,0.0029828623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4415607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71919334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4719602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051927734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012109382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898179403","doi":"","title":"Report on the Japan : Canada Law and Politics Seminar 2007 \"Problems on Contemporary Criminal Justice : Japan and Canada\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œJournal of law & politics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.060575952621861474,"score_gpt":0.2965814410263041,"score_spread":0.23600548840444266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898179403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85895073,0.000705726,0.0000037546959,0.016310016,0.0007218554,0.0001799515,0.00004072745,0.000008490193,0.12307876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98166925,0.00015929503,0.000019308161,0.014532208,0.00087695883,0.0000012853772,0.0000014559172,0.000016999524,0.0027232254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726474,0.00027243642,0.0005793684,0.00017332177,0.0011087328,0.0006014252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691707,0.0015159509,0.00040271986,0.0002958704,0.00034860472,0.0005197555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011906765,0.00021068954,0.0002996093,0.000025704716,0.0021025764,0.000076343225,0.00039679222,0.00008153364,0.000018676039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002532214,0.00013881514,0.000051316965,0.000058774927,0.001367475,0.00013587324,0.0000539929,0.0005074426,9.494751e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004483907,0.000052219024,0.0021381506,0.000079974816,0.000053215063,0.0010774578,0.00842833,0.000021361617,0.000012353602,0.9204515,0.067614794,0.000025771133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002583599,0.00038075738,0.0025541615,0.00025352693,0.00034741242,0.003234994,0.025408832,0.000016815764,0.00011987798,0.0028254108,0.9642923,0.00030754734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99340737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91762614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048161193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898831201","doi":"","title":"LA CONTRIBUTION DU JUGE LEBEL AU DROIT JUDICIAIRE ET À LA TRADITION CIVILISTE","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04526007921419212,"score_gpt":0.3393400224150378,"score_spread":0.2940799432008457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898831201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073971595,0.16968407,0.000014509518,0.5912618,0.0011140909,0.0007284435,0.00017757165,0.000022113498,0.2296002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560739,0.13475583,0.0000038251414,0.0055819093,0.00051433477,0.000026369746,0.00001959187,0.000012938378,0.0030112662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972608,0.001384795,0.00028036127,0.00024536246,0.00030331366,0.00052536244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982066,0.00029827305,0.00026439747,0.0005736971,0.00012713214,0.00052990415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005159875,0.00017723624,0.00036460566,0.000024007184,0.0030968785,0.00033637098,0.00078936975,0.00018339114,0.0006282748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013743042,0.00015564077,0.00019999295,0.00012201015,0.0015112379,0.00052147347,0.000033542772,0.0003630616,0.00073047075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023184102,0.000010555904,0.00020044803,0.00052511157,0.000016309166,0.00007058618,0.00087508943,3.167034e-7,7.789244e-7,0.8997877,0.035359755,0.06315102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009499193,0.0000191754,0.023271885,0.007682425,0.00028629624,0.000056330107,0.00010480193,0.000009414674,9.733549e-7,0.009192546,0.9590947,0.00018648333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7818011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96784514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9237349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010460529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024243053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898893873","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1355","title":"The Hours are Long: Unreasonable Delay After Jordan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maxim; Charter; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05316084632723779,"score_gpt":0.3553215033738679,"score_spread":0.30216065704663014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898893873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008905887,0.63652885,0.000029110714,0.1485819,0.0014534707,0.0013347291,0.000017671482,0.00012360851,0.20302474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82421815,0.16588384,0.00004941332,0.002511109,0.0003985538,0.00009433162,0.0000014619418,0.000016929129,0.0068262024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822396,0.00023107608,0.00023828736,0.00026530726,0.000539006,0.0005023472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825037,0.00016508703,0.00022888093,0.00094340544,0.0002147713,0.00019749241],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020369166,0.00014985738,0.00028059745,0.0000061659202,0.0032580926,0.0005554277,0.0011631426,0.00006312617,0.00047999303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007931164,0.000100283745,0.00018689563,0.00006286896,0.00082475564,0.0005125763,0.0001501555,0.00016970323,0.00048133585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069279435,0.000109404384,0.02869456,0.0020034579,0.00011003989,0.00033000647,0.0009966226,7.8740356e-7,0.000002785322,0.64675766,0.25653604,0.06438934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047587564,0.000011954643,0.0038024415,0.0032862306,0.00011103928,0.000005097455,0.00010037227,6.9117095e-7,0.0000045181837,0.0014964576,0.99097574,0.00015789056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052040066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048877057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81531227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006298453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001321554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900451763","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3089941","title":"The Democratic Resilience of the Canadian Constitution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Political science; Resilience (materials science); Law; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018191811074797858,"score_gpt":0.31195783041561065,"score_spread":0.2937660193408128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900451763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49258938,0.00482828,0.00041601746,0.18196408,0.0024103154,0.00044868473,0.0000024060257,0.000015201342,0.31732562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947383,0.0013514729,0.000004490018,0.000051231607,0.00014222768,0.0000010193327,2.4914375e-8,0.0000015058291,0.0037097484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983444,0.00012842623,0.00011875333,0.000061918305,0.00029939105,0.0010470839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.00007517986,0.00018309869,0.00023733862,0.0001026722,0.00008268255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031658483,0.000041923246,0.000052633106,0.000013812641,0.011339696,0.000230295,0.0010002136,0.000036764803,0.000007418129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012350986,0.000023262373,0.000055486445,0.000049139417,0.0013067288,0.00021116542,0.000025088431,0.0005927684,0.000007306743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040499513,0.0000020667173,0.0075418274,6.03177e-7,0.000006772215,5.8565354e-7,0.00033776485,0.0000045332076,0.000024425428,0.9854243,0.00028914885,0.0063639325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001254483,0.000054732114,0.024804847,0.000062129555,0.000036758076,0.00007499948,0.0074158562,0.00002142508,0.000105118386,0.88642615,0.08077106,0.00010149814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3773523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6158673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008089216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014236257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900928205","doi":"10.3138/9781487519117-005","title":"4 Canada’s “Constitution outside the Courts”: Provincial Non-enforcement of Constitutionally Suspect Federal Criminal Laws as Case Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Law; Constitution; Political science; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032434340986842086,"score_gpt":0.2626252715337703,"score_spread":0.2301909305469282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900928205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018494668,0.00016615665,0.000043696655,0.00008309555,0.0004067884,0.0013018822,0.00016900893,0.0000149632515,0.99596494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.622537,0.000030689338,0.000024637291,0.00002819061,0.00009559981,4.5236297e-7,0.000006179113,0.000005082004,0.37727213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819195,0.00008330043,0.0002715469,0.00031407186,0.0008935366,0.00024560897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857795,0.0001341352,0.00042449468,0.00031957068,0.0004216926,0.00012213392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038412208,0.00022972577,0.00039413237,0.000018904197,0.0009555024,0.000035509205,0.00053534925,0.00016159654,0.00058194116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028058577,0.00022473196,0.0001562634,0.000001326473,0.0013092705,0.00017177382,0.00021515012,0.00019703282,0.000003074309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024881077,0.000044209653,0.000036839723,0.00008750867,0.00018431706,0.001100091,0.021090232,0.000052683896,0.0000052320256,0.9714742,0.0051497426,0.00052613404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055644044,0.00027889563,0.000035942256,0.00017794904,0.00060237746,0.00006541569,0.021615006,0.000009467675,0.000015748567,0.00017968129,0.97615737,0.00030568693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99926955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012406997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010016397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900941409","doi":"","title":"Tanudjaja v Canada (Attorney General): Distinguishing Injusticiability and Deference on Motions to Strike","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Appeal; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Motion (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042243220621576365,"score_gpt":0.31598493763063534,"score_spread":0.27374171700905897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900941409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818962,0.00037928147,0.0012901422,0.008420714,0.00046085735,0.00012229655,0.0000070019287,0.000021877882,0.0074016023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977156,0.00018415443,0.0001198669,0.0003224641,0.00060458475,0.0000029980279,9.337128e-7,0.000007008601,0.0010423807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974469,0.00019904763,0.00019368774,0.00020693615,0.0005367057,0.0014167458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899226,0.00012399016,0.00007623277,0.00011755689,0.00021424613,0.00047568133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002568888,0.00010643255,0.00013302287,0.00003900129,0.0007330567,0.00014898888,0.00027902977,0.000045888413,0.000014202814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029897853,0.000098566314,0.00002753172,0.00019393928,0.00008308468,0.00015759151,0.00004342994,0.0008097587,0.000006097751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058981146,0.000063730266,0.020116465,0.000007963629,0.000031954256,0.000012855831,0.0044463654,0.0006262414,0.000044536693,0.9473746,0.0059591923,0.02125714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010533102,0.001730897,0.040546685,0.00025232998,0.00021347278,0.00017614516,0.09932428,0.00036045813,0.00008860986,0.5848146,0.2700934,0.0013457837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62570024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9731203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36255994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028617561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01011559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99549615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900948938","doi":"10.21810/jicw.v1i2.649","title":"A Canadian Perspective on Lawfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Intelligence Conflict and Warfare","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06100555119053641,"score_gpt":0.37292887486014437,"score_spread":0.31192332366960795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900948938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5710969,0.0069168964,0.000665858,0.17368199,0.0015871145,0.00039993192,0.000016627246,0.000030226287,0.2456045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604917,0.0014546686,0.00002379542,0.0011076928,0.0005596635,3.759285e-7,6.999374e-8,0.000004346317,0.000800222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915475,0.00012409234,0.0001648535,0.00006906571,0.0002584081,0.00022884406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986602,0.0002128946,0.00010457808,0.00010053071,0.00067881384,0.00024297484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095487334,0.000075041564,0.00011161158,0.00007993442,0.0007453499,0.000066859335,0.00036636755,0.00004961823,0.0003790767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043113736,0.000046901856,0.000045325367,0.00015362282,0.0005624913,0.00013576551,0.000016984537,0.00019539335,0.000054422675],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037832267,0.000037586182,0.0015269717,0.000009022952,0.000072724746,0.00006110114,0.4756612,0.000014641727,0.000109676825,0.4687812,0.013983024,0.039364517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062338455,0.0008554569,0.0013581943,0.00021434217,0.000058030106,0.00007907526,0.28707272,0.000021320438,0.001415325,0.009338334,0.69935095,0.00017390068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.338747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68536794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002056257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003666226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76269525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901670390","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0086","title":"<i>Dunsmuir</i> and the scope of admissible evidence on judicial review: Principled limitations or path dependency?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Charter; Judicial review; Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Duty; Law and economics; Law; Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0840774017677635,"score_gpt":0.3263102886251629,"score_spread":0.2422328868573994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901670390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05899976,0.108643115,0.0008779272,0.03272115,0.001070775,0.001341916,0.000020433466,0.00005060683,0.7962743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8480835,0.14939123,0.0008652587,0.0003642224,0.0001930661,1.3050382e-7,1.7824331e-7,0.0000032533137,0.0010991736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987802,0.00032960842,0.00017644415,0.000112856826,0.00044408237,0.0001567894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984967,0.00054751727,0.0002737377,0.00013719045,0.00040406157,0.00014077024],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014577315,0.000068197725,0.00020779352,0.000011434907,0.0012750063,0.000025149355,0.00041613774,0.00004255908,0.0010044327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009376041,0.000048921615,0.00008719444,0.000060768147,0.0012411878,0.0006342194,0.00006867634,0.000106755106,0.0000069558237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006637482,0.00033637098,0.00084449875,0.00057346595,0.00020137968,0.00009880671,0.07208092,0.000005694082,0.000504912,0.8162713,0.046185244,0.05625995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029776602,0.0022273029,0.004978274,0.014671381,0.0008424267,0.00006871598,0.03439918,0.000031703414,0.00046416596,0.003834229,0.9350525,0.0004524714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050286047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3406353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88886726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011152862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033183538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901792650","doi":"","title":"Power and wound: A study of the intersection of privilege and disadvantage in Symes v. Canada .","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Privilege (computing); Intersection (aeronautics); Power (physics); Political science; Geography; Law; Cartography; Physics","score_opus":0.0077394524844179215,"score_gpt":0.2928387641318213,"score_spread":0.2850993116474034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901792650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97425854,0.00010932839,7.714036e-8,0.00006057501,0.00019232961,0.00027421932,0.000003299835,0.000002063468,0.025099548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960878,0.00005100155,0.0000013275064,0.000008085993,0.000007526513,0.0000046100013,0.0000015748087,0.0000030017204,0.0038350578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936104,0.00006898837,0.00016138815,0.000115734154,0.0002182688,0.00007461198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997269,0.00007157164,0.00008537011,0.00007060335,0.000024762347,0.000020814057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013399229,0.00006329339,0.00014047424,0.000024623458,0.00007385927,0.000011660957,0.00008564759,0.00004765336,0.00008956149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042105068,0.000044732085,0.00001344886,0.00009599986,0.00006217917,0.000071932496,0.000011892394,0.00007886794,4.5263942e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006037417,0.00052451616,0.37734297,0.0004804464,0.00007430788,0.000010958392,0.59595174,0.0000043594505,0.00035075573,0.013575685,0.0009925811,0.010087971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012627662,0.00008866078,0.5087148,0.00016382623,0.000025219297,3.7328266e-7,0.48908013,0.0000012759297,0.00007345243,0.00017534768,0.0014713547,0.00007932314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9367505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99927175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1313718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006020495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024620155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18241215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902380474","doi":"","title":"KEEPING SECRETS: SURVEILLANCE POST PRIVILEGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Discretion; Secrecy; Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; Disadvantage; Scope (computer science); Enforcement; High Court; Computer science","score_opus":0.03150780530205958,"score_gpt":0.29836898566846004,"score_spread":0.26686118036640044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902380474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00662293,0.14886323,0.000004280939,0.62808233,0.0004370595,0.0015462679,0.000019652942,0.00006601089,0.21435826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204182,0.044103123,0.000030673975,0.03256401,0.0002896487,0.00005376958,0.000005616508,0.00001237487,0.0025226031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876976,0.0002988517,0.00015977387,0.00014067686,0.00020918892,0.00042172812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989697,0.00013681164,0.000053241813,0.00029802718,0.0001476589,0.00039456988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012680585,0.000082576684,0.0001697274,0.00002008308,0.0008314497,0.00011410543,0.0005085846,0.00003866318,0.004123794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074815634,0.000059865215,0.000067382985,0.0002094618,0.00020330503,0.0001787133,0.000020803744,0.00012064293,0.0027412553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014284768,0.0000090770745,0.0040026326,0.0014530431,0.000032860975,0.000031096508,0.0047853407,8.1788085e-7,0.00002158166,0.37886873,0.45845836,0.152335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012768158,0.000005369567,0.0057285586,0.00077236135,0.000009181244,0.000003276609,0.00014725931,0.0000016589972,4.4018697e-7,0.0004205523,0.99279946,0.000099128345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82376957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9580359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91379523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024353282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007168635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903715421","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Evidence Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.17555174541546748,"score_gpt":0.3600767748440726,"score_spread":0.1845250294286051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903715421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21465111,0.00089545094,0.0022468348,0.0154337445,0.000305386,0.00025660364,1.9940059e-7,0.00019604265,0.76601464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966994,0.00024161888,0.004719044,0.0001718306,0.00010759259,6.053663e-7,9.027303e-8,0.00000272717,0.027762497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994358,0.00004172333,0.00007718517,0.00012819604,0.00015709388,0.00016003176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995101,0.0001428084,0.000024973026,0.00010789269,0.000034969304,0.00017926068],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002808247,0.000045526376,0.000056096953,0.00002049247,0.0002836677,0.000050668878,0.00012884593,0.000039833176,0.0019423151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003030516,0.00003969419,0.000019252306,0.00011184048,0.0001148834,0.00062263076,0.000030750016,0.00003976214,0.00010896267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016997947,0.000012081086,0.033074528,0.0000069511652,0.000004376221,0.000003287597,0.025254281,2.0123305e-7,0.00011213909,0.90832734,0.012632725,0.020555098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109681394,0.00008611941,0.6781129,0.00015366593,0.00004246831,0.0000045991846,0.004781571,0.000013469161,0.00071829226,0.026520975,0.2891797,0.00027653194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092572846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07156051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8818064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017916474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039622933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903961450","doi":"","title":"Judging the Social Sciences in Carter V Canada (AG)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adversarial system; Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Expert witness; Charter; Witness; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.023248629641344526,"score_gpt":0.31499093539499246,"score_spread":0.2917423057536479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903961450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8289186,0.00091143645,0.0001916786,0.15824564,0.00044376292,0.00008005792,9.124683e-7,0.000011528065,0.011196417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966125,0.00066409906,0.0000033682634,0.0004465982,0.00056627474,0.0000020671812,3.0141635e-8,0.000003767978,0.0017013055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971749,0.0002066259,0.00014840068,0.00012090944,0.00050606474,0.0018430861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963135,0.0001736146,0.000070936425,0.000047574882,0.00004228018,0.000034262674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037893727,0.00006593154,0.00008299044,0.00003837521,0.0017483389,0.000085031585,0.0004795343,0.000031480547,0.00004929577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001549884,0.000035290024,0.00004239558,0.00023594209,0.0003609046,0.00026777323,0.00002293848,0.0004875761,0.000008030166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017905666,0.000013997273,0.030656343,0.000001485957,0.000017463108,0.00001070636,0.005536253,0.0000035435967,0.0001951893,0.89828134,0.0049293535,0.060336433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079293887,0.00018843357,0.017456554,0.00013291699,0.00004074856,0.0001534794,0.13129339,0.000014868569,0.00009182072,0.45845532,0.39082855,0.00055098895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61071056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.439826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017845826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012202488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904406678","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada issues important ruling on disclosure and implied consent under PIPEDA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04899394381235447,"score_gpt":0.3279208245709068,"score_spread":0.2789268807585524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904406678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197958,0.00022111715,0.000047675603,0.05548208,0.00016122089,0.000111467016,0.000012626515,0.000018807663,0.024149168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381953,0.000270065,0.000048379665,0.00026176719,0.00006291172,0.0000014746578,2.9764144e-7,0.0000037198786,0.005531821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.000036401845,0.0001678808,0.0001396479,0.00031261484,0.00021125526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935484,0.00032522395,0.000056167,0.000099221004,0.00005001316,0.0001145154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031062093,0.00006668703,0.00012023966,0.000012681051,0.00016835243,0.000017493723,0.000087334316,0.000031920576,0.00035225315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013049487,0.000039860162,0.000018978295,0.00003814987,0.00018982602,0.000060732822,0.000022270317,0.000027937122,0.0000020876953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100003606,0.00005407835,0.10759915,0.000047934936,0.00004160773,0.000023093353,0.003515702,0.000003461492,0.00968362,0.8064704,0.07059276,0.0018682004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001901358,0.0005709188,0.15852408,0.0011428451,0.00017091258,0.00002122654,0.09423481,0.000028383673,0.033276193,0.061633795,0.6469177,0.0015777894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7538413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9616558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74483657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071390816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058747036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38569248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905004868","doi":"","title":"UNMASKING THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN DISCRETIONARY NATIONAL SECURITY DECISIONS IN CANADA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; National security; Torture; Political science; Law; Criminalization; Civil liberties; State (computer science); Public administration; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.11396264168841275,"score_gpt":0.3348469862344929,"score_spread":0.22088434454608014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905004868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014705989,0.018700968,0.0000030491817,0.9119579,0.00027870183,0.0004963061,0.000019558594,0.0000056934036,0.05383181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840585,0.0069174212,0.0000035988471,0.008841353,0.00007590972,0.000022548851,0.0000047799963,0.000003396629,0.000072485134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857235,0.0005582252,0.00019372723,0.0001144452,0.00028012195,0.00028110988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989151,0.0006334367,0.000040853432,0.00016293704,0.00006701752,0.00018067184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027713105,0.000060388895,0.00011462908,0.000042252716,0.00047440792,0.000055579127,0.0005697958,0.000022040855,0.00035007243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00283284,0.000037647773,0.000030545227,0.0004141662,0.00013489832,0.00011409992,0.00003259686,0.00020458926,0.00003688713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2712912e-7,0.0000024627034,0.0033831187,0.000019834715,0.0000015120025,0.000006048696,0.0004245536,0.0000024435835,5.122265e-8,0.9606448,0.026573298,0.008941481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020026911,0.0000015453761,0.010025003,0.00081286015,0.0000033461017,0.0000027740716,0.00035970894,0.000044840282,3.7023614e-8,0.017109422,0.97156256,0.000057843852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99768984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96935254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016661345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059228614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905285799","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Local Governance Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Public administration; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.060262664740831945,"score_gpt":0.305191904016407,"score_spread":0.24492923927557506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905285799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061680406,0.00026894925,0.0075267544,0.0071528796,0.00019332381,0.00011136071,4.3879177e-7,0.00008767518,0.9229782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648429,0.000107935855,0.0023871604,0.00015499223,0.000085824984,3.403577e-7,1.408721e-7,0.000002424768,0.032418285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995387,0.000020398515,0.00006113616,0.00010328209,0.00013713654,0.00013935233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970114,0.00004292922,0.00002440451,0.00007767616,0.000019943205,0.00013388538],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012363163,0.000039098424,0.000048975668,0.000005988928,0.00019857219,0.00002766729,0.00009386739,0.000036541274,0.0014593625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006148688,0.00003438503,0.000015981494,0.00007394434,0.0001413567,0.0002994324,0.000022325754,0.000035497982,0.00008115845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007627443,0.0000074526574,0.00523212,0.00000199391,0.0000019371114,0.000001699716,0.005545836,3.4044177e-7,0.000009722712,0.9527926,0.009109968,0.02728872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100087454,0.00003393088,0.43954036,0.000022481316,0.000013022407,0.0000020241607,0.0020501888,0.000021469075,0.000287173,0.012246586,0.5455498,0.00013283605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11830873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13273446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023745552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028834777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906086483","doi":"","title":"2. Jane Doe v Toronto Commissioners of Police: a View from the Bar","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Engineering; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.04500768707799285,"score_gpt":0.31013209552219223,"score_spread":0.2651244084441994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906086483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062868436,0.009543989,0.00006237151,0.047638506,0.0021185346,0.00093529955,0.001046834,0.00008195072,0.93850964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15502991,0.0368402,0.0010767407,0.04594459,0.0155523615,0.0003986685,0.0044880244,0.0002475088,0.740422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966051,0.00024930548,0.0007507883,0.0005084572,0.0013831595,0.0005031626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698263,0.00069131714,0.0006861569,0.0007718619,0.00043950748,0.000428541],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011340239,0.00044863307,0.00065831235,0.000046075365,0.0011280802,0.00019680863,0.0011598006,0.0005351725,0.0652997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013593967,0.00035773314,0.00033420813,0.00006657716,0.000806974,0.0064520235,0.0002448152,0.00040819705,0.0020246557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056989436,0.00006113694,0.000010702601,0.000048346177,0.000083135485,0.000004961595,0.0023979032,0.0000010523169,0.000033171375,0.88857,0.0962322,0.012500375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002409899,0.00006691888,0.0007882548,0.0009238345,0.00028633655,0.0000037905738,0.0017526828,7.8781585e-7,0.000052079547,0.010093068,0.9853349,0.00045635688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042951435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10770578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8891027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044268253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003920292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906206383","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0033","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); Section (typography); Equal Protection Clause; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Business; Constitution","score_opus":0.07602330628816954,"score_gpt":0.28483974136079315,"score_spread":0.2088164350726236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906206383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015770413,0.00012396956,0.00003469893,0.00034525592,0.0004176344,0.00022721074,0.000022494716,0.000071566115,0.9987414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029766213,0.0020526245,0.00002582084,0.000022314322,0.00025826172,2.5066132e-7,0.0000017630807,0.000016570802,0.9946458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886745,0.000043505905,0.000097306816,0.0002657492,0.00040629288,0.00031967778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987481,0.00021946047,0.00023747719,0.0005350527,0.000111056324,0.00014880349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035250295,0.0001771247,0.00018435123,0.000038336973,0.0042958804,0.0002959083,0.0011809457,0.00027858093,0.00003525692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004964444,0.00015740242,0.0001590274,0.0000019786,0.0010442998,0.00015561204,0.00029129552,0.00035382406,0.00000380535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005390799,0.0000012038338,0.0000031442103,0.000009571385,0.0000335553,0.00007179041,0.0012488168,1.7957778e-7,7.4107845e-7,0.9825172,0.0062127067,0.009847229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092653594,0.000017057826,0.00000351077,0.00013410757,0.00010530946,9.628063e-7,0.0004357268,0.0000014221072,0.0000040912137,0.0037799848,0.9952182,0.00020695908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012908004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004772166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022891656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020536594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907040471","doi":"","title":"STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN A NEW NUTSHELL","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpreter; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Legislature; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04890395639949631,"score_gpt":0.3395160502354411,"score_spread":0.29061209383594483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907040471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015523818,0.2794363,0.00003858565,0.1167031,0.00043449504,0.0009901088,0.0000034004365,0.000024886453,0.6008168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89817584,0.06925629,0.0001232518,0.018057736,0.00009287943,0.000016485537,0.0000019673746,0.000010669806,0.014264879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912083,0.0003255977,0.000121624325,0.00008816263,0.00011964295,0.00022414238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995099,0.00006359265,0.000027914311,0.00013744818,0.00002324761,0.00023794008],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011569875,0.00004871688,0.000100007404,0.00002856153,0.00018516555,0.00003538954,0.0001888427,0.000025066603,0.0011472588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006356918,0.0000378116,0.00003444639,0.00021161656,0.00007847295,0.00009850667,0.0000034973605,0.000094886884,0.0003856833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016433288,0.000003984306,0.0005229181,0.00023209437,0.0000037183747,0.000015543848,0.007903687,0.0000020143937,0.0000010393389,0.79574317,0.1170384,0.07853177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020631649,0.000004092229,0.00030289163,0.0008333555,0.000010559986,0.0000011201553,0.00023364821,0.0000012148928,6.2033934e-7,0.002222062,0.99631816,0.0000516716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6208872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97890425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89662343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003379327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002378567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907973464","doi":"","title":"LA LEGITIME DEFENSE EN DROIT PENAL CANADIEN : ANATOMIE D'UN MOYEN DE DEFENSE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Self defense; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Criminal law; Section (typography); Penal code; Criminology; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.022987089396512266,"score_gpt":0.28436157626453895,"score_spread":0.26137448686802667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907973464","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030305842,0.44386938,0.000012954942,0.39121133,0.0005592759,0.0011227683,0.00015335761,0.000043189128,0.13272187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8079224,0.15476319,0.00028086637,0.022062307,0.0006595175,0.00006549809,0.000012662181,0.000059324106,0.014174245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961314,0.0012665406,0.00041818718,0.00039864882,0.00041232305,0.0013728838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969937,0.00037674018,0.00013796112,0.0005753221,0.00012593147,0.0017903068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037390841,0.00031300174,0.00050033117,0.000071987626,0.0012370899,0.000162555,0.0010502259,0.00025067033,0.0027059028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079290493,0.00028302,0.00029498007,0.00062915287,0.0010006296,0.00026174,0.00005728082,0.0006049638,0.001892921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058222604,0.000022032487,0.00013693832,0.0009367687,0.00007958561,0.002075619,0.007897473,0.000033332402,0.0000010517031,0.88095564,0.035716444,0.07213928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001403731,0.000033211687,0.00048683758,0.0039789937,0.00044385588,0.0007652499,0.000497067,0.0000052865144,0.0000034363889,0.019035777,0.9742395,0.00037037148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96184015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046694544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007342766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908018640","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i1.6837","title":"Two Myths of Administrative Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statutory law; Supreme court; Law; Administrative law; Judicial review; Deference; Political science; Duty; Legislature; Judicial deference; Standard of review; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial interpretation; Computer science","score_opus":0.15059853832563846,"score_gpt":0.45761073179224954,"score_spread":0.30701219346661107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908018640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90530217,0.0035228168,0.000010849669,0.0049886922,0.0007606178,0.00008585428,0.0000023198647,0.000005819326,0.08532084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689233,0.00036074256,0.00012910394,0.00015001863,0.00026832128,5.1088386e-7,4.4276472e-8,0.0000036884041,0.002195244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988861,0.00011050986,0.00034222496,0.00007378619,0.00043080715,0.00015659168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988693,0.00025488113,0.0003529023,0.00006773613,0.00038912077,0.00006608529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065639935,0.00007526765,0.00031583835,0.000029134704,0.00013361045,0.000036488032,0.00021551839,0.000022350749,0.00004320665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000125081,0.000056402296,0.000110408,0.00007908237,0.00039927318,0.00045406318,0.000041566924,0.00012577896,0.000025588812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006559477,0.00031450717,0.1495809,0.00026139052,0.00092169666,0.00030910352,0.17673166,0.000048843674,0.0021341771,0.66182464,0.0034187196,0.0037983977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013804602,0.0023117946,0.010336219,0.0011091719,0.00023459907,0.00009906481,0.27104324,7.273635e-7,0.0038317135,0.0036280707,0.7056503,0.00037458885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050022284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032564048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70223165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046219993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012523762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2300019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908624351","doi":"10.7202/1054351ar","title":"Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor’s Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Power (physics); Criminal justice; Obligation; Economic Justice; Bargaining power; Sociology","score_opus":0.04453274096055949,"score_gpt":0.3485523148975887,"score_spread":0.3040195739370292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908624351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14122158,0.00034009467,0.00069893274,0.059564434,0.0024944602,0.00037861185,0.000034639914,0.00021113253,0.7950561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995604,0.00007076382,0.0003862051,0.0014698928,0.0019462956,0.0000057630336,7.9553683e-7,0.000014979107,0.0005013083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979046,0.00036669374,0.0003056034,0.00019410554,0.0006969532,0.00053203973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987757,0.00038161376,0.0001625787,0.0001520579,0.00028950052,0.00023853814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020782116,0.00011947775,0.00013367127,0.000029960958,0.021774804,0.0003663958,0.0004840186,0.00017233887,0.00035543734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081797625,0.00008897032,0.00008807174,0.00023995878,0.0007949998,0.00041877895,0.00008830569,0.0010667351,0.0001126762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003441742,0.000029902165,0.00026847774,0.00001561699,0.000029145313,0.000028231349,0.0094004525,0.00001149467,0.0017718825,0.98249376,0.004918136,0.0009985099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022774964,0.000075406075,0.0005734973,0.00014581352,0.00010434397,0.00012915696,0.010229192,0.00009720388,0.00077204657,0.0057996036,0.9816342,0.00021177591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002306465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013835966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001669506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043156706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910558519","doi":"","title":"The Quebec Court of Appeal sentences to prison individuals found guilty of offenses in relation with bid-rigging in public construction contracts (Fedele)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Prison; Relation (database); Criminology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030299927636234954,"score_gpt":0.2955840605131331,"score_spread":0.2652841328768981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910558519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509465,0.00006840166,0.00043206234,0.034573134,0.0001685733,0.0004052339,0.000009639585,0.00002209054,0.01337438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964391,0.000038797712,0.00310371,0.00006738783,0.00008609855,0.000023022001,0.000004341825,0.000005381832,0.0002321518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984492,0.00025894065,0.00042697444,0.00018596296,0.00041194807,0.00026695465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987702,0.00050155947,0.00023776587,0.00015819567,0.000270145,0.00006218335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013976273,0.00008939501,0.00018363363,0.00017922463,0.0004426966,0.00008347294,0.00022835382,0.00006602245,0.0002508876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006503819,0.00007140302,0.000031187625,0.0005323945,0.0009551708,0.00016203905,0.000035650886,0.00012197227,0.000037861937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028732335,0.00046303708,0.32042402,0.00008747488,0.000050051418,0.000006582723,0.040313203,0.000095593154,0.0014566496,0.62014943,0.0064318874,0.010234758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008364949,0.00031818124,0.50231874,0.0011862684,0.000031387113,0.000009675234,0.05818224,0.000044089025,0.0006338258,0.0037488735,0.43237835,0.0003118553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0348602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31004217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61640054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116058545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002874336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97156674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910596530","doi":"10.7202/1054354ar","title":"« Why Couldn’t You Just Keep Your Knees Together? » L’obligation déontologique des juges face aux victimes de violences sexuelles","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08803811472317494,"score_gpt":0.3690641221948028,"score_spread":0.28102600747162787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910596530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58695966,0.039590765,0.0064521576,0.09285492,0.007963489,0.0006338934,0.00017007087,0.0003169661,0.2650581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790362,0.009097267,0.0031338164,0.0019507017,0.0026389563,0.000011161838,0.0000024710955,0.000037920458,0.0040914873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957674,0.0010533339,0.0006777289,0.0004887728,0.0008025993,0.0012101765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759287,0.00037648567,0.00048942585,0.00025422467,0.00071023183,0.00057677214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023311917,0.0004266909,0.0004670822,0.000097624936,0.010357741,0.0005304385,0.00086526276,0.0005273763,0.0015868995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043257212,0.0003850281,0.0002658873,0.00044719523,0.0039756917,0.0017304391,0.000121871366,0.00075268705,0.00030914572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036389113,0.00056595815,0.010313637,0.00032780925,0.00041467228,0.00029120166,0.045273986,0.0006718288,0.0016705629,0.6507256,0.018010017,0.27137086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027873096,0.00076774706,0.0010605798,0.00085355056,0.00022720214,0.0004324804,0.045172542,0.0003381021,0.0043327105,0.03164302,0.91433954,0.00055379566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03372574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1358888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8963295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052526616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001656496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911581924","doi":"10.7202/1059325ar","title":"Judicial Review, Judicial Revisionism and Judicial Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nagging; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Judicial review; Political science; Certiorari; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Original jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.020171180920885375,"score_gpt":0.30900866047303455,"score_spread":0.28883747955214917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911581924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8335138,0.00933777,0.000045399804,0.019521374,0.0010004033,0.0013106774,0.000022103717,0.00016077165,0.13508771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807838,0.012743076,0.00030916324,0.002303453,0.0015766982,0.000020778914,0.0000076862125,0.000022668293,0.0022326815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737257,0.00045304763,0.00048012746,0.00057810894,0.00049276213,0.0006233715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848634,0.00040116088,0.00018660749,0.00047209993,0.00015337118,0.00030043884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032623236,0.00015234688,0.0005343425,0.00007449072,0.0005349264,0.000096480806,0.0003944287,0.00020371069,0.0007740365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019275944,0.00021062649,0.00017312779,0.00040172625,0.00038850814,0.00033500345,0.0001288085,0.00033497877,0.0005370049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012566522,0.00045259928,0.08547805,0.005217212,0.00011085512,0.00040390776,0.015270746,0.0000097548345,0.00421749,0.64225954,0.095536135,0.14978705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010778403,0.00053873507,0.08304557,0.0087758275,0.00042311737,0.000105462226,0.0014635276,0.000088804816,0.00022275583,0.27377608,0.62906665,0.0014156246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027353463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001456179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53353053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002731432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003850755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8589099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911869162","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Joan Barrett,","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Charter; Political science; Statutory law; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019036106994754692,"score_gpt":0.30678205173696055,"score_spread":0.28774594474220583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911869162","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018114996,0.9384093,0.00034086694,0.03982004,0.00028080033,0.00013602227,4.3138348e-7,0.00004698539,0.019154044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09324167,0.8495721,0.000017740318,0.009018219,0.00076232635,0.0000034726363,5.460855e-7,0.000010173356,0.04737375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699265,0.0001927419,0.00022437035,0.0001413802,0.0004934236,0.0019554237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994475,0.00005387012,0.000106542924,0.00012414681,0.000103833096,0.00016407724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023084183,0.000096776,0.00016615706,0.000038325466,0.0012081638,0.000028796252,0.00038143687,0.000052053336,0.0010258476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002692356,0.00008532943,0.00013878221,0.00017617237,0.00020066406,0.00040794138,0.000019960064,0.0011226125,0.00024965036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016639762,0.000033208144,0.0006165693,0.00002240242,0.0000351407,0.00003838685,0.0012613699,8.177003e-7,0.000016512502,0.11052529,0.87884825,0.008585404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090396476,0.00007867167,0.000105503554,0.0001392823,0.000026086058,0.0005252086,0.00071531744,6.762301e-7,0.000007797276,0.011977648,0.98621416,0.00011925331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047292738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016925789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1073659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006844399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036152292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911900466","doi":"10.4324/9781315165950","title":"Criminal Law and Precrime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.08425168733058977,"score_gpt":0.3675954641243153,"score_spread":0.2833437767937256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911900466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015374826,0.0007424755,0.0000061488054,0.0012367795,0.00031308207,0.0001386459,0.0000046400996,0.000055735723,0.9974871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030565225,0.00049163937,0.00014352836,0.0005092891,0.0007745632,0.0000041210333,0.0000043402874,0.000011789673,0.9950042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990497,0.000034067456,0.00010787373,0.00025953806,0.00031584516,0.00023298086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993086,0.000113642105,0.00009002166,0.00026477707,0.00006725668,0.00015572336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036312113,0.00013266188,0.0001989223,0.00002101686,0.0010147006,0.0003062026,0.0003696491,0.0002497579,0.0009705171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008778946,0.00012072962,0.000059732796,0.0000053260624,0.0010806763,0.00022236675,0.000098174976,0.0001798085,0.0002604672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040908485,0.0000031836564,0.0000027047183,0.000041220796,0.000005495774,0.0000108872655,0.0015037784,4.2062265e-9,6.71903e-7,0.824815,0.17061713,0.002995888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029978359,0.000023327613,0.000020196154,0.00011668492,0.00008008095,0.0000024781505,0.00024697292,1.9634453e-7,0.0000037307511,0.042976804,0.9563352,0.0001643365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011980466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027119776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072910596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043831542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912319985","doi":"10.7202/1055484ar","title":"L’approche canadienne : assurer la protection des droits de la personne de façon distinctive","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017808781985040285,"score_gpt":0.25756029108215583,"score_spread":0.23975150909711554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912319985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8694249,0.0008400215,0.0015593134,0.0033045972,0.0003629576,0.0005171676,0.000024498322,0.00007022783,0.12389633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529379,0.00026253093,0.0011514481,0.00008680442,0.0006965038,0.00008487827,0.0000047764847,0.000038283273,0.044736847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701357,0.00086136564,0.00023967655,0.0004905568,0.00021452102,0.001180283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984759,0.0005013424,0.00016189637,0.0002547594,0.00012884788,0.00047727252],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025651718,0.00020388875,0.00032067997,0.00007087357,0.00048423372,0.00017627414,0.00035635335,0.00047378367,0.0004155529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008476789,0.00030276066,0.00018656613,0.0004993812,0.00077861256,0.00042227906,0.00005668794,0.00061049423,0.0002714274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028107024,0.00054101576,0.06154852,0.0026631576,0.00020641582,0.0005554818,0.18704967,0.00075341255,0.01073066,0.64159495,0.0013752356,0.09270041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013839696,0.001008825,0.16436207,0.0041184695,0.0008637214,0.0021380603,0.05794586,0.011129462,0.0023634015,0.40003684,0.35245913,0.0021901985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08773679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03743872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35108387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024920166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000538789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913197957","doi":"","title":"Strafrechtelijke afhandeling van seksueel kindermisbruik in de context van scheidingsproblematiek","year":2018,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Theology; Art; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05422706619301375,"score_gpt":0.32575305457336884,"score_spread":0.2715259883803551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913197957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97208744,0.0035020332,0.003272504,0.0018271115,0.000758575,0.0006542142,0.00032080367,0.00017822937,0.017399112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99210817,0.0029092564,0.0016248049,0.00080758106,0.0016011242,0.000013137506,0.00022498604,0.000054516986,0.0006564002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.994811,0.0008350217,0.00088177784,0.0013014743,0.00062545197,0.0015452912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969118,0.0009188644,0.000386105,0.0011372735,0.00010122376,0.0005447194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039675944,0.00053552724,0.0006663497,0.00015915089,0.001520629,0.00071439915,0.0026146085,0.00027255932,0.000273911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114837865,0.00053174724,0.00008589559,0.0006783497,0.00083949516,0.0013163665,0.0013092667,0.00071941654,0.00017511555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011153554,0.00072647264,0.195145,0.004703029,0.0004689322,0.0002505109,0.5193566,0.0017599148,0.003102067,0.010453713,0.0077343676,0.25518402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002346389,0.0006711782,0.03170428,0.016803952,0.00063477625,0.00009004517,0.2210124,0.5915032,0.00021354815,0.030933393,0.10128148,0.0028053534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028931383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17656685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58974326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011379948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002780418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913346266","doi":"10.3968/10690","title":"The Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Obatianed Co-defendant Confession in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Witness; Law; Criminal procedure; Legislation; Political science; Voluntariness; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0233669500163668,"score_gpt":0.3375525587376357,"score_spread":0.3141856087212689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913346266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5057816,0.00006870484,0.0000031384366,0.0069337566,0.0005588747,0.00015892879,0.000011819177,0.000011839019,0.48647135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856687,0.000023445034,0.000023301865,0.00024344672,0.0002978397,0.0000040862724,6.958468e-7,0.0000035680923,0.00083674607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982385,0.0001275505,0.00018115954,0.00021785156,0.00060717895,0.0006277548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991823,0.00009689388,0.00007737749,0.00012770783,0.00017280041,0.00034295008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021044891,0.00007055,0.0001081112,0.00010656822,0.004285261,0.00009287591,0.00078261964,0.00006828286,0.00022641926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005335243,0.00005584904,0.00003670359,0.0009214175,0.0058874753,0.000297153,0.000056634693,0.000113007096,0.000040331255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058308087,0.00004655588,0.037831053,0.000013414151,0.0000044412013,0.000045899087,0.1279183,6.1255724e-7,0.0044872393,0.7337185,0.020304538,0.07557109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020352274,0.00007760401,0.17557327,0.00007692542,0.000005827162,0.0000016880826,0.04525355,0.000060361865,0.00072407076,0.005558154,0.7721817,0.000283335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31053796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6176894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7518771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004963499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030632112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913809600","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2018.20995","title":"La réforme du Code de procédure civile du Québec : une nouvelle culture de l’exécution ?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021109636610618657,"score_gpt":0.28794609108785985,"score_spread":0.2668364544772412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913809600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81550616,0.0023044352,0.009033742,0.06188749,0.0010755385,0.0002941969,0.000088750836,0.00011926737,0.10969044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95215005,0.0009836546,0.0007256994,0.0008529722,0.0032556828,0.000039181068,0.000024226834,0.000022961221,0.041945554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814105,0.00020355587,0.00036051773,0.00035683622,0.00038203405,0.00055598136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985211,0.00035602693,0.00022720518,0.00018662788,0.000449916,0.00025915264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009055195,0.00020691771,0.0002536793,0.00006639754,0.0005151036,0.00015873449,0.0006831616,0.0002652799,0.001231737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043793547,0.00024423253,0.00018184798,0.00030815566,0.00080793304,0.00041276513,0.000100828125,0.0003593041,0.0007553511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018799554,0.0007787876,0.10138926,0.00040810255,0.0001918279,0.00020274542,0.12373368,0.0007163736,0.0010097318,0.5353562,0.22087975,0.015145508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002823583,0.00011974514,0.017780429,0.0007189167,0.000086947904,0.0004967072,0.00377034,0.013756143,0.00044660713,0.008578379,0.9536603,0.00030313365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105489254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3055157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7327805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024378262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012583743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913819351","doi":"10.3390/laws8010005","title":"The Evolving Common Law Jurisprudence Combatting the Threat of Terrorism in the United Kingdom, United States, and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Convention","score_opus":0.030481947602808448,"score_gpt":0.30861611831997876,"score_spread":0.27813417071717034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913819351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802736,0.00025044061,0.0000019647428,0.013580662,0.00015355014,0.00025082694,0.0000044309527,0.000009615539,0.0054748957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833417,0.00012543217,0.0000081403205,0.0012996969,0.00003224383,0.0000060444595,0.00000502882,0.0000050729545,0.00018417835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985316,0.00046713155,0.0001929412,0.00011894379,0.0004139801,0.0002754406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972186,0.0022925667,0.00010624291,0.00027906877,0.00006880265,0.00003471107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015705148,0.000082930484,0.00011447282,0.000021086378,0.00085096504,0.00012676607,0.00060455623,0.00003737151,0.000014171528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010395549,0.000041659696,0.000019456307,0.00039591044,0.00044561984,0.00011472574,0.00008112467,0.00022564396,0.0000016484265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037022222,0.000030057578,0.15799588,0.000048790997,0.000019278315,0.000016986478,0.045815405,0.00025654217,0.000085776795,0.78994566,0.0048185973,0.00093001546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003338173,0.000073562886,0.05440893,0.00032592833,0.000040086124,0.0000056259496,0.09248941,0.0022410087,0.00010770157,0.008187532,0.84153295,0.00025345993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98977166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99151176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8367143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065768465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011475489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6545021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914140473","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Allan Manson,","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01922482970445926,"score_gpt":0.3061189524680304,"score_spread":0.2868941227635711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914140473","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035195404,0.92158777,0.00040767263,0.049334627,0.0002395728,0.00015072554,3.5174216e-7,0.0000518552,0.024707893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073878385,0.87069374,0.000019889714,0.008353649,0.0006087623,0.0000030548858,4.9247865e-7,0.000009148603,0.04643289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723136,0.00016483599,0.00020730705,0.00013253301,0.00044865705,0.0018153278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995134,0.00004333305,0.00009955191,0.00011364719,0.00009406054,0.00013604044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020329438,0.000089517416,0.00015235024,0.000033752614,0.0009879152,0.000025374484,0.0003580835,0.000048410035,0.00079913763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015857039,0.00007874306,0.00011847749,0.00014015395,0.00012066927,0.00029260502,0.000017186529,0.00091741554,0.0002609588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019831863,0.000039069397,0.00068448036,0.00002773973,0.000041875977,0.00004838938,0.0014832168,9.054257e-7,0.000028088485,0.12089995,0.86816597,0.0085604675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085380045,0.00007621026,0.00011963252,0.00011924507,0.00002358811,0.0005055216,0.00069995667,4.993347e-7,0.000006335426,0.011980075,0.9862758,0.00010775438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059118296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026049209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11810982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005946431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025772697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87499964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914151147","doi":"","title":"Is the Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full? An Exploratory Study of Defence Lawyers’ Constructions of Plea Negotiations and Accused Persons’ Rights within the Ontario Criminal Justice System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Brock University Digital Repository (Brock University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Criminal justice; Law; Negotiation; Political science; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.034495128071860975,"score_gpt":0.24918093415555795,"score_spread":0.21468580608369697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914151147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788428,0.000030134815,0.000054485998,0.000010024641,0.00078971504,0.000867839,0.000068504676,0.00007619229,0.019260319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8462514,0.0000096436315,0.000026914742,0.0000060630846,0.00005315034,6.8451607e-7,0.000023805578,0.000014384065,0.1536139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973755,0.0004713542,0.0003810178,0.0006370077,0.0008179544,0.00031716423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969261,0.0005640161,0.0009068306,0.0006041324,0.0007746832,0.00022419184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000028165647,0.0003618029,0.0004912544,0.000330311,0.0029679474,0.00022127644,0.0012257828,0.00031375908,0.000008849909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007371998,0.0002970866,0.00022054203,0.00067858305,0.00064915785,0.0020104337,0.00019678407,0.00050182536,0.0000057736706],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010265059,0.0030333756,0.07006058,0.003712687,0.0024297421,0.00055876706,0.8650596,0.0007600447,0.0041837664,0.028173862,0.011487324,0.00027519424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060332246,0.0004986683,0.0037827026,0.0003002461,0.002695542,0.000031234562,0.98327917,0.000007768024,0.000103289094,0.000011339266,0.008340273,0.00034645153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057761144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68899727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63123614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007900499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015801598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914773908","doi":"10.1177/1365712718824123","title":"The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Convict; Mistake; Law; Jury; Statute; Reasonable doubt; Order (exchange); Common law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.16362823244949623,"score_gpt":0.4585632105028251,"score_spread":0.2949349780533289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914773908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6333557,0.011627294,0.0006534419,0.3440513,0.002302905,0.0003651725,0.000009554744,0.000010978454,0.0076236892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975303,0.0006236015,0.0002415235,0.00039771208,0.0006234543,0.00000371225,1.245383e-7,0.0000034823358,0.0005760934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810725,0.0003544741,0.00028042545,0.00012937866,0.0009694141,0.00015903295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252814,0.0052964846,0.00025262157,0.000109106775,0.0017347474,0.00007891936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016630535,0.00008621127,0.00015545364,0.000033151726,0.0003892073,0.0003731404,0.0009759626,0.00003344294,0.00015540312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029589278,0.00004177501,0.000079890604,0.0000900613,0.00082285696,0.0009073557,0.000113089016,0.00030902904,0.000042776344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019189693,0.00013184988,0.011093438,0.000006604792,0.00038878492,0.00006849509,0.18659514,0.00008876293,0.0028867577,0.7779797,0.010744012,0.008097502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067957345,0.0007965811,0.02350653,0.002005009,0.00020900184,0.00012572457,0.38455456,0.0005282162,0.003588568,0.50587213,0.07772271,0.0004113668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015577711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001070035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36417463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020110878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035051967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35982016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915010883","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Study of Terrorism Charges and Terrorism Trials in Canada between September 2001 and September 2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Conviction; CLARITY; Political science; Criminology; Law; Demographics; Criminal law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.054776744281488876,"score_gpt":0.38189772587430443,"score_spread":0.32712098159281555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915010883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99641854,0.00088207825,0.000009123387,0.0010813384,0.00019437246,0.00035527797,0.000003763024,0.000006032505,0.0010494769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979114,0.0005457777,0.000009392443,0.000047476984,0.00029436135,0.000003791141,9.2937876e-7,0.000011540661,0.0011753242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619246,0.0010427539,0.00061214826,0.0002682011,0.0005138307,0.001370586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989111,0.0003816836,0.00029004674,0.00014378797,0.000058577247,0.00021481587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008040071,0.00015256494,0.0006072007,0.00009810651,0.00019583107,0.000056479636,0.00022989624,0.00009072608,0.00018105414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014467454,0.00012637152,0.000048037098,0.00016485696,0.00007674274,0.0003807422,0.0000362236,0.0008381193,0.00000598329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049041424,0.0000822912,0.9891105,0.0000082376,0.000067939036,0.0000061181527,0.00554679,0.0000028214768,0.00006444706,0.00014959714,0.0012067282,0.0037054443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028928353,0.0019891094,0.7309349,0.00010610393,0.00022888275,0.00006455034,0.23592693,0.000039480237,0.000037244376,0.009790772,0.017443558,0.00054560706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67050403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98327947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31277543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008652633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042154873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74780935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915173087","doi":"","title":"Resisting to Penal Populism By Which Means? Discursive Strategies to Barrier Conservative’s Criminal Law Reform in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"XIX ISA World Congress of Sociology (July 15-21, 2018)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Deportation; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Immigration","score_opus":0.03446119606055683,"score_gpt":0.32617390047113265,"score_spread":0.29171270441057584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915173087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82446826,0.00038131,0.00003288695,0.039263066,0.001961721,0.00073275645,0.0002949653,0.000057679244,0.13280733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900572,0.000018416818,0.00050434645,0.00348572,0.0003999237,0.000060981572,0.000019648267,0.00002426987,0.005429525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641013,0.00050644466,0.00070510275,0.00067640113,0.00062281254,0.0010790895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974703,0.0005591369,0.00030607104,0.0004091342,0.00078546454,0.00046988457],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011352983,0.00033890855,0.00066790864,0.00015004742,0.0011283936,0.000089257395,0.0010146551,0.00019718794,0.000628473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074454775,0.00031633748,0.00008266988,0.0005056289,0.0022135242,0.0005277473,0.00024129215,0.00044696793,0.000087726294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088280346,0.00011234111,0.025108006,0.00014937477,0.00016093644,0.0000795825,0.10522268,0.00002390054,0.0021023892,0.4743481,0.39096358,0.0008463199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014119607,0.0009390799,0.07970643,0.0009930546,0.00024022693,0.000009554933,0.3270577,0.000032002816,0.003771611,0.018911608,0.56488585,0.0020409215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45543647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001195332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024072353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916002909","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n1p74","title":"The Accused Privacy Rights in the Sudanese Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Political science; Right to privacy; Human rights; The Right to Privacy; Legislation; Statutory law; Criminal procedure; Law enforcement; Bill of rights; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.02406401330468809,"score_gpt":0.3171481105581854,"score_spread":0.2930840972534973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916002909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277614,0.0002241438,0.0000015550111,0.009029885,0.0003446977,0.000076887634,7.3149374e-7,0.0000023328048,0.062558405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987558,0.00003498067,0.000010193249,0.00023928925,0.00030983766,3.8775156e-7,4.0147995e-8,0.0000016008566,0.00064784946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990957,0.00017212072,0.00019628384,0.0000412961,0.000303317,0.00019131848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.0004468866,0.00010721564,0.000092644244,0.00007288491,0.000062834784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013484068,0.000042573756,0.00009502974,0.000015541316,0.00041086768,0.00023395653,0.00030191932,0.000030425243,0.000007073321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053490174,0.000019448104,0.00004492858,0.000052983953,0.00016111959,0.00018533194,0.000017512606,0.00014402039,0.0000069853018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000628726,0.000008521456,0.00063976867,0.000009663649,0.0000034984016,0.00002085754,0.0035582406,7.0977705e-7,0.000006299912,0.9953569,0.0003642342,0.000025009605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016598841,0.00006253443,0.0029143698,0.00007698915,0.000014375361,0.00005341971,0.008481707,0.0000111752,0.000014895349,0.011098657,0.97706234,0.000043546792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00929585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028881708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98425823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046031255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008132422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916111119","doi":"10.22459/ca.2019.11","title":"Sentencing Acts: Appraisal of Court Records in Canada and Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ANU Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.08710162567786404,"score_gpt":0.3285061917631983,"score_spread":0.24140456608533423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916111119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04182278,0.00021072633,0.0000019749564,0.000076012264,0.000812978,0.00029243322,0.00004534656,0.000011268979,0.9567265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31681368,0.00011994301,0.000030963012,0.000049111197,0.00013213568,0.0000029957455,0.000003027299,0.00001447133,0.6828337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988152,0.00003371866,0.00027235955,0.00024725072,0.00038519676,0.0002462739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923354,0.00024126377,0.00018236156,0.00017996189,0.00006742023,0.000095447154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002592078,0.00015493325,0.00031394835,0.000039518658,0.000048962083,0.000025767946,0.00021481217,0.00016272756,0.00007149501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049674436,0.00016063008,0.000040534782,0.0000043344594,0.00017727005,0.00006300852,0.00007168974,0.00024614343,0.0000027656754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002875287,0.00002629038,0.007907998,0.0018647126,0.00024132075,0.00045119255,0.044207178,0.000021336371,0.00026025827,0.8338715,0.070643626,0.040217068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001774257,0.000043995675,0.0005272738,0.0009877761,0.00006853345,0.0000039084543,0.0011283964,0.000006497013,0.00012101301,0.00312879,0.99340475,0.0004016616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99807173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001654903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010989404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6550304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918754399","doi":"","title":"The “Best Interests of the Child” as a Factor in Allowing Foreigners with Criminal Records to Enter Canada and in Staying the Deportation of Foreign National Offenders from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Criminology; Criminal record; Political science; Immigration; Foreign national; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.22727127223096946,"score_gpt":0.5141562471285382,"score_spread":0.2868849748975688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918754399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933018,0.0005334938,0.00000832402,0.0012890036,0.00022034427,0.00035041175,0.000030472831,9.820839e-7,0.0042651743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993006,0.00039261428,0.000019472674,0.00019167514,0.000036701178,0.000014441685,0.0000011396902,0.000008529777,0.000034798304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789655,0.00020907885,0.00047791022,0.0001842817,0.0010035378,0.00022864465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980876,0.000661837,0.0006947092,0.00023420584,0.00022836591,0.000093317845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010171179,0.00012314295,0.0002527709,0.00008587399,0.0007314773,0.00043145113,0.0018178514,0.00003222729,0.00013185023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012877741,0.00007118183,0.00004105029,0.00019751806,0.00025436954,0.0008251042,0.00025944586,0.00021255866,5.680428e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017712548,0.000017476112,0.9912671,0.000017410386,0.000041831972,0.0000115469,0.0031301063,0.00013446469,0.00033286147,0.00028229493,0.00077203714,0.0038157615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016522392,0.000006260201,0.98193914,0.00065812154,0.000021543894,0.0000016865066,0.013963917,0.000017739447,0.0010180757,0.0014981508,0.0006122016,0.0000979344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99747634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99975866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010833811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032981113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020482442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56260055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919878300","doi":"","title":"TRANSFORMING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW THE DIDACTIC ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Political science; Precedent; Mainstream","score_opus":0.05413915082977199,"score_gpt":0.31507479021099816,"score_spread":0.26093563938122616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919878300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024995781,0.07920714,0.0000012272849,0.45941666,0.0002622406,0.0016641467,0.00006849332,0.0000072348366,0.43437707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98967135,0.006732416,0.0000018380605,0.0028344656,0.000038143753,0.000010067972,4.3992063e-7,0.000004231713,0.00070703356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988438,0.00027101606,0.0002086666,0.000077683646,0.0003383897,0.0002604566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918365,0.00020286022,0.00009954527,0.00028095293,0.00008961172,0.00014335763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010120725,0.00007170068,0.00017342174,0.000005742667,0.00077955506,0.000015387037,0.00064838835,0.000023719942,0.00038432743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020165098,0.000035300338,0.00008363234,0.00022910639,0.0004786668,0.00006555191,0.0000095956275,0.00012197563,0.000003106571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006878579,0.000009363887,0.00059225364,0.00038459283,0.0000407766,0.0000082506385,0.009965897,0.000003311317,0.000035021283,0.9672363,0.012633705,0.00908365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001805228,0.000009402252,0.0004900015,0.00071133464,0.00007473262,0.0000059072318,0.0022929548,0.0000012069679,0.000088555775,0.0009429925,0.9953131,0.000051722396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021412942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004023039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71366984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920824330","doi":"10.7202/1056926ar","title":"Le pouvoir discrétionnaire de poursuite limité par l’instauration d’un programme de mesures de rechange","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02603215084303591,"score_gpt":0.2833058125478369,"score_spread":0.257273661704801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920824330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747141,0.0035384824,0.0019807462,0.082090184,0.0007426683,0.00075445615,0.00002899035,0.0001754011,0.035974976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97658646,0.0016792407,0.0029965418,0.00074102305,0.0012705135,0.000092988856,0.000021727074,0.00004737747,0.016564142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966764,0.0005777639,0.0003685303,0.00049269275,0.00034927033,0.0015353446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849176,0.00024029808,0.00023911301,0.00039192353,0.00012338466,0.0005135092],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002275406,0.0002216777,0.00034578505,0.0000789534,0.00069895433,0.00027418346,0.00052273634,0.00044922528,0.0002587828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049866067,0.00032976957,0.00027200548,0.00048598187,0.00030963705,0.000702938,0.00008163629,0.00041758476,0.00030201676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015475336,0.00064066687,0.06856174,0.0010443403,0.000111332614,0.00024108945,0.054030824,0.00047217336,0.0050348397,0.7294653,0.006065584,0.13417737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016993319,0.0010027322,0.107431784,0.0038868145,0.0006863606,0.000792347,0.03091543,0.011290622,0.0074560274,0.52878743,0.30380493,0.0022461985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054623657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007052545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29773936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011979854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011462944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921761527","doi":"","title":"The Question of the Constitutionality of Non-Economic Damage Caps in Personal Injury Cases in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Personal injury; Political science; History; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.016910806222451422,"score_gpt":0.3132199670846373,"score_spread":0.29630916086218584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921761527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840148,0.000024862931,4.7962254e-7,0.0014737782,0.00019274357,0.00010567663,0.00001476993,8.5136287e-7,0.014172006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962705,0.000017782224,0.0000043773816,0.000044224074,0.000011250252,0.000001661941,3.544382e-7,6.146586e-7,0.00029269562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947983,0.00010086707,0.00013829186,0.00006212662,0.0001324981,0.00008637689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954724,0.00028830342,0.000053405478,0.000072513794,0.000023389124,0.000015145388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060997915,0.00002846032,0.00006708167,0.0000097760385,0.00007116907,0.000005653927,0.00014215684,0.000017238413,0.00013501315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001149767,0.000017764141,0.00001819423,0.00006124766,0.00029474363,0.000075986616,0.000023341208,0.00005144278,0.0000025163383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001729251,0.000007289404,0.87340987,0.000009024306,0.0000016666763,8.163865e-7,0.000808902,0.00006962069,0.00012666664,0.12481198,0.00048014845,0.00025672148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008500638,0.000011340862,0.98230714,0.00006008527,0.000003164317,6.901525e-7,0.013021585,0.00023952544,0.00044283376,0.0004229109,0.003354623,0.000051128853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99721193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12438906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003665066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026606922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47199538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923835347","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198794578.003.0001","title":"Responding to Wrongful Convictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Law; Commission; Political science; Criminal law; Royal Commission; Criminology; Criminal procedure; Criminal court; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.06723504331728755,"score_gpt":0.35200779436921165,"score_spread":0.2847727510519241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923835347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003420427,0.00007256368,0.00012746132,0.0074260077,0.00083032984,0.00025774518,0.000008731433,0.000089983856,0.991153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005957496,0.000091418406,0.0001826413,0.0007139665,0.00044259336,0.0000028945622,0.0000028439813,0.00001726207,0.9925889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900955,0.000017379098,0.00014543609,0.00025751727,0.00035196615,0.00021815277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929607,0.00018805322,0.000047716272,0.00022273013,0.00008531825,0.00016009383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034958395,0.00012049793,0.00016929336,0.00025132956,0.0003315482,0.000086098116,0.0002516044,0.00020382338,0.012588554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008560027,0.000118501244,0.000096515876,0.00006217059,0.00009727393,0.00010575759,0.000065371154,0.00016182523,0.01122031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074546488,0.0000013663021,0.000007899221,0.000004835105,0.000006457712,0.000003452765,0.0010949288,8.8075495e-7,0.0000075897005,0.94406873,0.053608246,0.0011881476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019521247,0.000028216153,0.000010856015,0.00010057072,0.000022261871,6.7447104e-7,0.0005112026,3.656413e-7,0.0000032855203,0.007647928,0.9914851,0.00016997411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008646481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004130799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015500105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026056598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929839016","doi":"10.11114/ijlpa.v2i1.4117","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the State Risk Harm Paradigm","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Harm; Context (archaeology); Normative; Criminology; Charter; Risk society; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.02664774922519254,"score_gpt":0.3360038582367707,"score_spread":0.3093561090115782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929839016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938228,0.000319484,0.00053798873,0.079000205,0.0010440608,0.00013294708,0.000015478128,0.000008835786,0.025118211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977836,0.00090310373,0.00006473913,0.00046088384,0.00028095758,0.0000015293709,0.0000020889229,0.0000025111797,0.00050056464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906945,0.0001483786,0.00024015862,0.00007306287,0.0003776421,0.000091311886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900335,0.00032833713,0.00027696707,0.000046235626,0.0002537843,0.0000912959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010040787,0.000051083858,0.00008936417,0.000037304842,0.00022904499,0.00042995202,0.0001683893,0.000030587646,0.00013687265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016160407,0.0000354304,0.00004281792,0.000035769845,0.0003676785,0.0007260519,0.000018186352,0.00013641137,0.000007310879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017549006,0.00002628108,0.0056748134,0.0000021742753,0.00005344945,0.00000556524,0.0030686348,0.0000022423035,0.00000999603,0.9874996,0.0002357009,0.0032460343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017970786,0.00030091117,0.008371988,0.000042660413,0.00005770498,0.00022947579,0.004423452,0.00021563465,0.00005058032,0.10151654,0.8828588,0.00013519425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085882796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016892214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8859831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002864517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018095183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41460374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2931356137","doi":"","title":"WHITHER JUDICIAL REVIEW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Economic Justice; Administrative law; Judicial activism; Standard of review; Remedial education; Action (physics); Law and economics; Judicial deference; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.043854095294708524,"score_gpt":0.3552670090950194,"score_spread":0.3114129138003109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2931356137","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000091934315,0.34934917,4.1737837e-7,0.4156669,0.00043907983,0.00057485787,0.000004653622,0.000019798435,0.23385319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057275698,0.8160811,0.00004395567,0.11907808,0.00091033144,0.00005356938,0.0000032919006,0.000016987407,0.006537003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998905,0.0002041179,0.00017227377,0.00013176294,0.0002462096,0.00034064148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904704,0.000060261485,0.00005569708,0.000361031,0.00008786162,0.00038812243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022705276,0.00008282569,0.00020912568,0.00001530269,0.0007716659,0.000043258566,0.0005707221,0.000046635505,0.009127637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088966487,0.000055761895,0.000095749194,0.00024631468,0.00028015103,0.000084688974,0.000015416983,0.00026192283,0.0021353841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3475277e-7,0.000002684228,0.00007057803,0.0011254523,0.000005343549,0.000009248138,0.00031438816,6.879774e-9,0.0000025707766,0.20921168,0.7065631,0.082694575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010447637,0.000003425661,0.00019405766,0.0045377607,0.00007089966,0.000004879401,0.000016256203,7.7842024e-8,3.9854666e-7,0.0007993521,0.99427813,0.000084330044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46412733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.973519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50939167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007944767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010256374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935913652","doi":"","title":"Injury and Mischief versus the Public Interest","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Freedom of expression; Supreme court; Political science; Expression (computer science); Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.15113245724839375,"score_gpt":0.39378759888558157,"score_spread":0.24265514163718782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935913652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5748933,0.000070172966,0.000023298799,0.08954802,0.0006565978,0.000056781064,4.883863e-7,0.00003932748,0.334712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579,0.0000396498,0.000046580357,0.00042342342,0.0003651547,0.0000015004048,9.555434e-8,0.0000015493329,0.0033320629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961644,0.000048098027,0.00004266298,0.000076863456,0.00008760962,0.00012833698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996837,0.00012219533,0.000011789207,0.00008343462,0.00004081209,0.000058071044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032524858,0.000029153067,0.000029399438,0.000010331526,0.0004742797,0.0001408234,0.00015889214,0.000021954673,0.0007414941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025268845,0.000017393535,0.0000120333625,0.00007663578,0.0006554519,0.00015849578,0.000053271473,0.000039986364,0.00016958742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003467993,0.0000075112266,0.00055322476,0.0000011736015,0.0000041759404,4.6886828e-7,0.002614233,4.47651e-10,0.0000476566,0.921638,0.051214546,0.023884319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045819692,0.000074198666,0.00076026545,0.0000029788748,0.000003733954,3.0868526e-7,0.0045870426,0.0000024131689,0.000056096967,0.0013153944,0.9931156,0.000036144163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010932223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03443113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001034656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035595327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935949159","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199589111.003.0002","title":"The Legal Right to Security of Person","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Meaning (existential); Human rights; Charter; Law; Fundamental rights; Convention; Politics; Right to property; Context (archaeology); Original meaning; International human rights law; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035008710131329744,"score_gpt":0.30386989609369086,"score_spread":0.26886118596236114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935949159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015830994,0.00024302457,0.0000042508987,0.007876254,0.0004276157,0.00020665328,0.0000069846265,0.000017355678,0.99105954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07768969,0.00013594053,0.000017468434,0.00017532942,0.00024358375,0.0000010283624,7.189864e-7,0.000006966506,0.92172927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911064,0.000020066429,0.000115553725,0.00016082017,0.0004266378,0.00016626845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993554,0.00019532829,0.00006845865,0.00020925008,0.00009549006,0.00007612294],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043168018,0.000095677526,0.00015591666,0.000020941172,0.00028580613,0.00005919365,0.0003723074,0.00013728658,0.0022503422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049479175,0.000060266095,0.000117455194,0.00001597311,0.00022523089,0.00007003747,0.000042583233,0.00014180156,0.00064563716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008106779,0.0000017419425,0.0000031743866,0.00000886502,0.000006834862,0.0000015608907,0.0020692456,7.7785494e-8,0.0000024948083,0.9520349,0.04507256,0.00079043396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148566705,0.000033294295,0.0000071581253,0.000050771796,0.000016714042,3.3929655e-7,0.000884357,6.549436e-7,0.000020982197,0.010302528,0.98857474,0.00009360081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007986132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03594186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052495474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021229211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940409106","doi":"","title":"Smart Devices in Criminal Investigations: How Section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Can Better Protect Privacy in the Search of Technology and Seizure of Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law enforcement; Certainty; Search and seizure; Data Protection Act 1998; Criminal law; Computer security; Law; Political science; Enforcement; Criminal investigation; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.018183162111168143,"score_gpt":0.2550223109746564,"score_spread":0.23683914886348825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940409106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895397,0.00005599467,0.0000016325113,0.009128759,0.00003855073,0.0005225863,0.0000097792445,0.0000025296251,0.0007005012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996848,0.000004967922,0.00013451066,0.00012210557,0.000014320558,0.000015906287,0.0000014241218,0.0000016812678,0.000020243488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918634,0.00015027837,0.0002085844,0.00008105861,0.00023889788,0.0001348673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994936,0.00006521118,0.00013242575,0.0001601569,0.00011081714,0.000037765854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007008713,0.000055947014,0.0001319375,0.00019622865,0.00011457586,0.000025520547,0.00021909131,0.00010572613,0.000011359754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013252425,0.000037368507,0.000017407045,0.00046565416,0.0006355975,0.00039371266,0.000028880599,0.00019146422,5.244987e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024706744,0.00002575636,0.84857494,0.00051277166,0.000012062144,6.787031e-7,0.05218801,0.000013662251,0.0028868003,0.09467474,0.00010053754,0.0009853331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005798711,0.00023368337,0.94121706,0.0007753222,0.000033071075,0.0000070829724,0.019202579,0.000093142786,0.012728695,0.015455487,0.009516643,0.00015735473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62734514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91900265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2916575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044373166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022665707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37513638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940804553","doi":"","title":"‘Rescuing the Canadian Unconscionability Doctrine? Reflections on the Court’s “Applicable Principles” in Downer v. Pitcher’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07203743871741729,"score_gpt":0.29795892631618487,"score_spread":0.22592148759876757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940804553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31382775,0.00003940752,0.000058399994,0.03967353,0.0003705166,0.00052130845,0.00004339207,0.000031976844,0.6454337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928447,0.000029597537,0.000019248655,0.00016308177,0.00018274273,0.0000034071588,0.000004857206,0.000004656636,0.0067477236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983711,0.00018394686,0.00021297335,0.00029988185,0.0005710656,0.00036102693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820435,0.0005235291,0.00019523651,0.0006873918,0.0002281556,0.00016130757],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086696324,0.0001498373,0.00017064292,0.00006920982,0.009176866,0.00038935812,0.0011564613,0.00012729788,0.000051418825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052954577,0.00009131548,0.00014952029,0.00016097544,0.0029885254,0.0005343441,0.00013806453,0.00042239824,0.000049860708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022523622,0.00014628537,0.17908241,0.000018694715,0.000077382625,0.00012698502,0.006335887,0.0016940654,0.000040529198,0.80212486,0.009100599,0.0010270487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002418388,0.000035477817,0.26092216,0.000097615535,0.000026675172,0.000016568805,0.0023952227,0.00006929798,0.000030121808,0.0046745483,0.7313245,0.00016597661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48296627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76187795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7974503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006853214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015858576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940991144","doi":"10.7202/1058625ar","title":"Présence et omniprésence de la notion d’atteinte initiale dans l’arrêt Montréal (Ville) c Dorval de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.008378027274041733,"score_gpt":0.25693390506199115,"score_spread":0.2485558777879494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940991144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87138647,0.0013333387,0.0008106362,0.01771944,0.0016697188,0.0003709986,0.00009804089,0.00007223717,0.1065391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823496,0.0023576664,0.00067653524,0.0009776813,0.0011522272,0.000029705361,0.0000136542585,0.000045908833,0.012397065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566215,0.0014962087,0.00045736402,0.00059324986,0.00060525135,0.0011857488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696594,0.001697725,0.00023916073,0.00043373907,0.00014820213,0.00051523733],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026607816,0.00028470467,0.00044682398,0.00005942867,0.00043494193,0.00025415025,0.000743898,0.00043318066,0.0004848868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007935423,0.0004208911,0.00020052835,0.0004089256,0.00083329715,0.0006267621,0.00013408581,0.00074185786,0.00023851849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033492735,0.0006415254,0.15770076,0.0015055087,0.00016114916,0.0048725377,0.07146065,0.008262325,0.014297892,0.68726546,0.045784894,0.0077123996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019469004,0.00055402506,0.1693303,0.0037157382,0.0005773743,0.004404098,0.04742651,0.017923763,0.0030096928,0.049577482,0.69869214,0.0028419408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91349524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8085984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65290725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002239477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003117779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941922000","doi":"","title":"APPROPRIATE LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINATION OF COMPENSATION FOR INFRINGEMENTS OF ABORIGINAL TITLE IN CANADA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03954718599351613,"score_gpt":0.3739969426043751,"score_spread":0.33444975661085896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941922000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7045595,0.0000529538,0.0024601598,0.00020295504,0.0026275495,0.0019160825,0.00009973815,0.000011011967,0.28807005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96499467,0.000018745373,0.005660476,0.000010966929,0.00012836615,0.000053417745,0.0001400011,0.0000073182982,0.02898606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955237,0.0000082826355,0.00016146785,0.00006758725,0.00014316784,0.000067116234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957156,0.00004660455,0.00014895695,0.00003660929,0.00018507811,0.00001119509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017844641,0.000037520633,0.00008964747,0.000035273875,0.00003114573,0.000005488708,0.00007449553,0.000038881437,0.00010856537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061853745,0.000037499944,0.00002033771,0.000038443617,0.000014773082,0.000063744956,0.0000018252094,0.000016020223,0.0000010886814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006867272,0.00014189265,0.0023760465,0.0044564614,0.000046825626,0.000001100318,0.013677163,0.000014581574,0.0015467996,0.8670488,0.020063182,0.089940436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032618162,0.00009422143,0.004649271,0.000259975,0.000055187113,5.457652e-8,0.00485045,0.000852839,0.0089954175,0.002935236,0.9767985,0.00018271455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69896954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95673525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121784906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010077955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30303508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942641253","doi":"10.7202/1058346ar","title":"L’article 7 de la Charte canadienne et la discipline carcérale","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Administration of justice; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.014000138434191126,"score_gpt":0.2912391789809407,"score_spread":0.2772390405467496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942641253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84358716,0.0014134205,0.00004542104,0.024376534,0.00046038878,0.00020914056,0.00004532155,0.000050991846,0.1298116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190821,0.0007205805,0.00033971743,0.0004887812,0.0005764885,0.000017328966,0.000006944894,0.000031032534,0.07873705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742174,0.000636146,0.00026743347,0.0003915885,0.0001938105,0.0010892509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983325,0.0006106011,0.000105699015,0.0003520368,0.000056526194,0.00054266065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018016952,0.00015463021,0.00030309494,0.000049412844,0.00023100253,0.00016181602,0.00041903195,0.0002619436,0.0011770244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015624012,0.00023227229,0.00016934735,0.000382597,0.0005176529,0.00043081804,0.000103247665,0.0004163929,0.000975406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004688503,0.00024032104,0.06025752,0.00047705666,0.000050870163,0.00040471397,0.046449337,0.00048456452,0.0035735131,0.86434644,0.0039603645,0.019708417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085302856,0.00025488719,0.094621204,0.0010948478,0.00024676978,0.00040437008,0.0102854185,0.0036943995,0.00069300935,0.14395405,0.7429456,0.00095242163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04623687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05625016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73898524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005844946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942719136","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1337","title":"Caron, Carter, and Bedford at the Supreme Court of Canada: Society Can Change But History Will Always Stay the Same","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional court; Constitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06991777902156548,"score_gpt":0.28270529773256386,"score_spread":0.21278751871099838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942719136","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036957,0.61730653,0.000013266064,0.33043084,0.0016036299,0.0025795407,0.00043122921,0.000073937525,0.010604035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7082431,0.26313707,0.000029235342,0.01690955,0.0006278757,0.0001762249,0.000009579953,0.000040065228,0.010827345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973944,0.00038993527,0.0004101975,0.00035140157,0.00087294175,0.00058112026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981926,0.00045955798,0.00024400809,0.0006099776,0.0002849382,0.00020891384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098044,0.0002330125,0.00048117657,0.0000074534382,0.00084595336,0.000020253761,0.0006557189,0.00008264659,0.00065309205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017342585,0.00011859362,0.00020723301,0.0001072789,0.0014679311,0.00025493905,0.0001830239,0.0001519979,0.000006575777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014765861,0.000025581518,0.001664711,0.0012723804,0.00009842427,0.0000085945585,0.009342634,9.363596e-8,0.0002979352,0.047792625,0.93005615,0.009426074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011260676,0.000031644835,0.00058224535,0.0012099233,0.00017930113,0.000006952506,0.0006973373,0.0000010075119,0.000041704123,0.0001794074,0.9967674,0.00019045256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77225196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96961236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67128605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012659683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010369571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942808126","doi":"10.7202/1057115ar","title":"Change of Terminology? Change of Law?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Realisation; Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Civil code; Law; Law and economics; Extension (predicate logic); Terminology; Political science; Code (set theory); Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0814592853559841,"score_gpt":0.31640734734720216,"score_spread":0.23494806199121807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942808126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143137,0.00036131917,0.0000026458038,0.0016496918,0.00022482222,0.00030164947,0.000012904119,0.00002263241,0.083110645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754745,0.0002541651,0.00011460804,0.00021713559,0.00032163993,0.000023942455,0.0000024708072,0.000007277712,0.001511326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992145,0.00005760098,0.00016970096,0.00014668456,0.00014553733,0.00026601073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944264,0.00008596299,0.00012614789,0.00022086588,0.00006035138,0.00006406171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034166704,0.000051553285,0.0002240028,0.00004599422,0.000050715673,0.000006828555,0.00027741515,0.000108374974,0.00027327103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048948514,0.000071897,0.00008443193,0.00011897377,0.00021614516,0.00020922066,0.000045462984,0.000073310286,0.00010442083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044025197,0.000121019,0.11108612,0.0007141947,0.000021192891,0.000024213237,0.04898849,5.798464e-7,0.0037136883,0.8188529,0.00023563964,0.016197937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017224357,0.0016148399,0.4467942,0.0032662596,0.00034285337,0.000053798372,0.016533783,0.00016181775,0.017525865,0.13556024,0.37483057,0.0015933309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008220527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019894543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052280735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000305174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943076925","doi":"10.7202/1058324ar","title":"Daigle : un oubli des questions de droit civil et constitutionnel ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030078089540344504,"score_gpt":0.2908784442393147,"score_spread":0.26080035469897017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943076925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67197824,0.00641283,0.0057361536,0.018448494,0.0017186442,0.00048217192,0.000086648586,0.0001768099,0.29496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94982105,0.0028828764,0.0025930502,0.00073483563,0.00061299506,0.000031627096,0.000016700822,0.000026646767,0.0432802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747044,0.00035519767,0.00038673053,0.000490922,0.00030968024,0.0009870175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983465,0.0004055575,0.00016595284,0.0004457324,0.00018290598,0.00045334978],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014439587,0.00019482923,0.00036187886,0.000093265364,0.00067970995,0.00022551318,0.00053578045,0.00032734388,0.0024957561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005463399,0.00032116086,0.00024248475,0.0006379405,0.0013534948,0.00091175083,0.00010449629,0.00045122366,0.0025244276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670301,0.00019173269,0.018700907,0.00030932567,0.000037446585,0.00008135578,0.0063672783,0.00059210666,0.0003902283,0.96469563,0.0020071922,0.0066101095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059929414,0.00021688189,0.022695268,0.0023324746,0.0003160653,0.0004777968,0.004723608,0.0015251467,0.0002794213,0.75381064,0.21215971,0.00086367613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008482199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010583242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2778428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001163458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008784181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943113700","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1348","title":"A Withering Instrumentality: The Negative Implications of R. v. Safarzadeh-Markali and other Recent Section 7 Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Parliament; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.09600120144211084,"score_gpt":0.39102804646399125,"score_spread":0.2950268450218804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943113700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10648911,0.09605793,0.0003114258,0.3915315,0.0012192866,0.0046440675,0.00009434501,0.00014583157,0.3995065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914657,0.08344512,0.00012756298,0.0014039596,0.00011458585,0.000055578657,5.718166e-7,0.00000787623,0.00018773042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990244,0.00018685375,0.00021890755,0.00018052713,0.00023072178,0.00015861621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989795,0.000107567364,0.00026083481,0.00046995873,0.000120377794,0.00006177801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011821297,0.00008631877,0.0001884056,0.0000069540683,0.0012751172,0.0001008471,0.00041285777,0.000037597703,0.00019728423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033268178,0.00006140674,0.00005207019,0.00007598166,0.0008720931,0.00030511298,0.000099037396,0.00010102982,0.000007746983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000251542,0.00007677733,0.01852538,0.0013766554,0.00008036078,9.691787e-7,0.005516144,5.1490406e-7,0.00059142784,0.850079,0.0049088146,0.1188188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061127546,0.000020849837,0.0063554575,0.0017545816,0.00007617026,0.0000033748663,0.00039115982,0.0000012393806,0.00012754885,0.0044817403,0.98663485,0.00009187816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011949305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016088959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98172605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054497392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006935035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943115346","doi":"10.7202/1058122ar","title":"En relisant Ross c. Dunstall","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Rite; Philosophy; Obligation; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.01867795514089262,"score_gpt":0.27685526283479844,"score_spread":0.25817730769390584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943115346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71432626,0.0073267384,0.00006896753,0.02800537,0.0028664067,0.0003437797,0.000027310134,0.00007798362,0.24695717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8082142,0.0030624836,0.00041984362,0.0005455122,0.0011581526,0.000009529694,0.0000064960373,0.000026982796,0.18655685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978122,0.0002347474,0.0003249699,0.00044964656,0.00033212866,0.0008463198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998727,0.00032948784,0.00013383923,0.000431757,0.0000786794,0.0002992108],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010046469,0.00015445046,0.0003361427,0.000045405133,0.0002122218,0.00012882242,0.0005537402,0.00031753807,0.0028380712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018855672,0.00024440765,0.00023122893,0.00036501524,0.00030892054,0.0004934217,0.000109691566,0.00036806232,0.0076929512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007368274,0.00025246633,0.020905,0.00077809347,0.000075685864,0.00037022764,0.027540814,0.00039884515,0.001600923,0.87469786,0.03399254,0.03931383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002720189,0.0001665733,0.00809452,0.0009053516,0.0001070739,0.00009975145,0.0024808953,0.00069484144,0.00019234534,0.04160755,0.94486916,0.00050989137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050662495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014801464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91087663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057590345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002187607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943129660","doi":"10.7202/1058322ar","title":"Les troubles de jouissance et les atteintes aux droits d’autrui résultant de travaux publics non fautifs","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Publics; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0386731860621237,"score_gpt":0.3135820500437,"score_spread":0.27490886398157627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943129660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720554,0.0058738803,0.001483708,0.038092528,0.0008903781,0.00053196866,0.000081963975,0.00015328272,0.080836855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319792,0.0041125705,0.0018606149,0.00065192184,0.0010175171,0.000045154688,0.000019509673,0.00007606681,0.060237456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956258,0.0005229854,0.00067973544,0.0008140535,0.0005746412,0.0017827959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735373,0.000752295,0.00037175903,0.00061360694,0.00030757108,0.00060104067],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023760572,0.0004040505,0.0007099113,0.00014078639,0.00068922277,0.0005651452,0.001189103,0.0006985385,0.0010235114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007649706,0.0005802034,0.00040542532,0.00074833125,0.00077431666,0.0010682826,0.00015823208,0.0009599242,0.0006017029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085770844,0.0003006638,0.05694653,0.0010618846,0.00010589459,0.00015180548,0.019804863,0.0006244607,0.008273737,0.8672873,0.004472943,0.040884156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017237787,0.0009434936,0.14046462,0.0059770145,0.000703295,0.0005446921,0.023762528,0.015271893,0.0059830006,0.12618603,0.6756435,0.0027961733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03175632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0150903715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74110126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001213176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010881503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943588959","doi":"10.7202/1057476ar","title":"Le nouveau droit de la preuve en matières civiles selon le Code civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.009841112205534169,"score_gpt":0.24603345880473976,"score_spread":0.2361923465992056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943588959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7501525,0.0030630517,0.00034239647,0.029680114,0.00066429493,0.0004367939,0.000044232358,0.00013712118,0.21547945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466931,0.0014301089,0.0006403917,0.00039185327,0.0011026204,0.00004265714,0.000009934037,0.00006137451,0.04962793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673647,0.00077566766,0.0004709794,0.00060275994,0.00039563567,0.0010184974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738264,0.0013746067,0.00024934142,0.0005158392,0.00010633432,0.00037120792],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018023351,0.0002629542,0.00053857244,0.00008046478,0.0005696298,0.00025648176,0.00088948105,0.0005026466,0.0010584798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049834454,0.00041806573,0.00031084602,0.00036971862,0.0007705473,0.0006949697,0.00018545076,0.0005311855,0.0013393484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008501259,0.0005566609,0.048398905,0.0014428543,0.00012736791,0.00022121573,0.08622007,0.0007799309,0.003829521,0.83381164,0.01784894,0.006677901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111721,0.0003537861,0.021617163,0.0023796814,0.00032220242,0.00042735928,0.02920255,0.0051513836,0.003299441,0.1006446,0.8339628,0.0015218322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26728958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.447361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8161138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014355386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031160987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943743192","doi":"10.7202/1058221ar","title":"La décision de la Cour suprême dans l’affaire Mahé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015253848435101152,"score_gpt":0.28818842059722916,"score_spread":0.272934572162128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943743192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.723575,0.0019480922,0.00022165704,0.0074912747,0.0006905818,0.00020948955,0.000023927387,0.000065782,0.2657742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931144,0.0019384845,0.00065176294,0.00017859542,0.0006808142,0.000010369073,0.0000052472296,0.00003344531,0.1033869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973181,0.00076770445,0.00030167014,0.0004383111,0.00036203835,0.0008121716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815714,0.0009095531,0.000120944496,0.00040450678,0.000064749285,0.0003430873],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020927296,0.00017696894,0.0003393034,0.00005480754,0.0002771509,0.00018575379,0.00059628714,0.0005175934,0.0012653441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024505964,0.00026442812,0.0002457748,0.0003662256,0.00060064846,0.00042468647,0.00009817567,0.0005051245,0.0022511813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099996156,0.00037268086,0.0729287,0.001048767,0.000058520174,0.0008979481,0.03949508,0.00040769856,0.004587357,0.813362,0.016594704,0.050146524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004987221,0.00020712084,0.034579188,0.0017564333,0.00019003375,0.00053935166,0.015128501,0.0017284877,0.0003705987,0.08901057,0.8552916,0.00069940573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071396288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020551803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8386969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072607986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036111314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944015268","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1340","title":"R. v. Nur: A Positive Step but not the Solution to the Problem of Mandatory Minimums in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Conviction; Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Sentence; Context (archaeology); Political science; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0335330232733288,"score_gpt":0.29734338735551935,"score_spread":0.26381036408219055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944015268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04020672,0.0839955,0.00035626968,0.81568205,0.000721163,0.005955201,0.00023857807,0.000042113166,0.05280243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98196554,0.011852345,0.00007875858,0.005227937,0.00008850881,0.00007736852,9.989327e-7,0.0000066299863,0.0007019031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836266,0.0004045957,0.00029790538,0.00017161659,0.0004835397,0.00027966595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990834,0.00033456337,0.000104249106,0.0002550312,0.00014867302,0.00007405926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014062831,0.00009080194,0.00021606631,0.000008864798,0.0002422767,0.000014496871,0.0004753533,0.00002510142,0.0001541609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012826279,0.000042598145,0.000060301772,0.00018490251,0.00020823444,0.00012398612,0.00006727856,0.00007544608,0.000039890867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011564247,0.000093179005,0.0015806054,0.0017675002,0.00006664516,0.000025755342,0.0054989294,0.000003014462,0.0014639767,0.4747462,0.27147734,0.24316123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006696827,0.000026202211,0.0012853058,0.0040967464,0.000039332583,0.0000015332303,0.00040469057,0.0000010271458,0.00016044546,0.00017213037,0.99365264,0.00009300314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90835637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99141866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036964475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092438236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18634209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944601930","doi":"10.29173/mlj991","title":"Bargaining for Justice: The Road towards Prosecutorial Accountability in the Plea Bargaining Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Discretion; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Economics","score_opus":0.1151852980119802,"score_gpt":0.415100337242644,"score_spread":0.2999150392306638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944601930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82937187,0.0002573162,0.00028024378,0.018663269,0.0046770773,0.0013712811,0.000012501245,0.00004503675,0.1453214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99312264,0.000027525366,0.00011393909,0.0006222501,0.006017192,0.000063551735,7.100038e-7,0.000011946446,0.000020250473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977197,0.00033011276,0.00035328904,0.00022461735,0.00080036453,0.0005718816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985261,0.0003549199,0.0003342817,0.00038684934,0.00030138576,0.00009644201],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008151801,0.00014775264,0.0001909966,0.000022137841,0.010433152,0.0023953875,0.0019049416,0.00010603184,0.000040390456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026431105,0.00008642089,0.00012232801,0.000080428734,0.00065929384,0.0010197363,0.00008995894,0.000608175,0.000008327643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010855799,0.0002979651,0.012278015,0.0001394854,0.00007374456,0.00010070637,0.25363842,0.00012161926,0.0000688577,0.5065369,0.0037839503,0.22187477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001124377,0.000203868,0.030896246,0.00021909253,0.0002029599,0.00007313301,0.75611097,0.0002351445,0.000060462757,0.10062766,0.10984996,0.00039610613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05450707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27563405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017488167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036046706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945873252","doi":"","title":"National security and counter-terrorism in Canada: past, present and future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DPCE Online","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislator; Parliament; Legislation; Political science; National security; Counter terrorism; Law; Work (physics); Public administration; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015302049352184419,"score_gpt":0.29744126424473827,"score_spread":0.28213921489255384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945873252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96448797,0.00043619386,3.356783e-7,0.031246642,0.00019898874,0.00008824844,0.00003847997,0.0000046076498,0.0034985095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982566,0.0001596087,0.00002943392,0.00033310315,0.0009333607,0.0000013946816,0.000008938126,0.0000020665507,0.0002754777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993849,0.000032655087,0.0000754029,0.00012002289,0.00026779834,0.000119219454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978215,0.00005417808,0.00002234996,0.000039322967,0.000045058485,0.00005697472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001713741,0.000044529268,0.0000719117,0.000015751903,0.000055277753,0.000019334566,0.000057983798,0.000030190866,0.00007713951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001056751,0.00004096557,0.000006230819,0.0000555194,0.00004090776,0.00010852324,0.000028457425,0.0000783994,0.0000019224767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013826533,0.0002905419,0.8042496,0.00024194036,0.000029478859,0.00008582156,0.035601173,0.000027253851,0.00011750952,0.053349018,0.084225126,0.02164426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002043642,0.000017682794,0.18402904,0.00002632542,0.0000033245194,0.0000027756803,0.011401336,0.0004689034,0.0000023242167,0.0015626452,0.8021811,0.00010016268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7833065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.717956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012451467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004022367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2181365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945995780","doi":"","title":"The power of persuasion : the politics of the new right in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Black Rose Books","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Politics; Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.0318731851168803,"score_gpt":0.29019189004054613,"score_spread":0.2583187049236658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945995780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062905797,0.0007233325,0.0000035591559,0.0023602364,0.0004644221,0.00046662698,0.00000609741,0.000008395808,0.9896768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08564008,0.00008570453,0.000009634509,0.0001923057,0.00017806141,0.0000014386117,9.905594e-7,0.000013584563,0.9138782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811393,0.00013394127,0.00042055364,0.00018438268,0.00078333094,0.0003638403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828494,0.0006233286,0.0003260687,0.000566395,0.00012065873,0.000078636076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112814,0.00016988922,0.0002499701,0.000037105554,0.0004994104,0.000043662556,0.0010098509,0.00026277403,0.00020062327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013583938,0.00008275957,0.00024428172,0.00006105616,0.0017297297,0.000047535817,0.00017417723,0.0005659018,0.000018590836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038449216,0.000023250464,0.00037694225,0.00001908843,0.000019834937,0.0000044976446,0.058658637,0.0000025038971,0.000010427019,0.812488,0.12797445,0.000383887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009423805,0.00003534776,0.0021415844,0.00026500333,0.000043588047,7.65141e-7,0.0023790738,4.4530842e-7,0.000077400735,0.050504014,0.9443532,0.0001053399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17287078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7454755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8163788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054933556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038859847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83263713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946096329","doi":"","title":"Les procédures d'urgence devant le juge de l'Administration au Québec","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04922682452168812,"score_gpt":0.3089659430221098,"score_spread":0.25973911850042164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946096329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58485407,0.0049967957,0.042616487,0.1544404,0.0008128186,0.0009264134,0.00008058949,0.00033365833,0.21093878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94005126,0.0008008897,0.011516829,0.00008957281,0.00013883988,0.00011008357,0.00013167321,0.00004228318,0.04711858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883237,0.008253567,0.0007701314,0.0009832976,0.00088026084,0.0007890471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99259067,0.0016980825,0.0007352581,0.0014223164,0.002938896,0.00061480654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012293285,0.0004550309,0.0004730012,0.00010688286,0.0018020254,0.0005654313,0.001902405,0.0005205164,0.0003024273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043153823,0.00051093457,0.00027806638,0.0005031379,0.0014246142,0.00044349243,0.00080195867,0.0007667713,0.0002032465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004484402,0.0009375424,0.009820875,0.00034249533,0.00006474737,0.000017973054,0.13130417,0.00011608216,0.0015559131,0.7889909,0.0040585827,0.06274584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005858919,0.000004305584,0.019431202,0.0048309406,0.00026300046,0.000056969086,0.010435916,0.0057866722,0.037970845,0.02140322,0.8976511,0.00157997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65604925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7827164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015431703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012302224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946648245","doi":"10.7202/1070286ar","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt’s Literary Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Judicial opinion; Sociology","score_opus":0.13267640555325838,"score_gpt":0.3690378664706056,"score_spread":0.23636146091734722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946648245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89470935,0.00029675246,0.0000324539,0.005127698,0.0011719936,0.00036233576,0.000025910482,0.000051844356,0.09822168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800247,0.00006168004,0.00020067362,0.0008826001,0.0007927546,0.0000037214072,3.329578e-7,0.000009332177,0.000046423185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978711,0.0003338911,0.0004624177,0.00022835577,0.00074409676,0.00036013403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.00014922062,0.00024166802,0.00011191134,0.00019292014,0.00042360253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007753392,0.00012736651,0.00025600943,0.00003693074,0.0044089113,0.000104719926,0.00033156542,0.00005667783,0.00027605525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025282474,0.0001109924,0.00009340083,0.0003028645,0.0002252628,0.000613923,0.00010242322,0.00032402272,0.000030022225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010292041,0.0038168966,0.007053419,0.0004011663,0.00048337164,0.10764513,0.6732554,0.00029650534,0.00038730173,0.14301944,0.009728752,0.05288345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017332315,0.0025129465,0.00024192804,0.00020790407,0.000731189,0.0033747023,0.2548732,0.00008909948,0.00012995914,0.0015279788,0.7340718,0.00050608534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013137615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030340549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.724343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006758831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036957204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946861318","doi":"10.7202/1059326ar","title":"La compétence globale de l’arbitre de griefs et l’erreur juridictionnelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01914906466047106,"score_gpt":0.2830613906821091,"score_spread":0.26391232602163806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946861318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6740107,0.0036258742,0.00093226356,0.024719734,0.0012412309,0.00028738801,0.000051010316,0.00012370458,0.29500806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519112,0.0029058282,0.0017216776,0.0014488804,0.0007891491,0.000017233653,0.000008659375,0.000031546286,0.04116584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714583,0.00063354196,0.00033445482,0.0004934195,0.0003350105,0.0010577347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984007,0.00046471128,0.00016985781,0.00042274283,0.000090939364,0.00045103612],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017715277,0.00020110153,0.0003561583,0.000051558287,0.00035542567,0.00017607807,0.0006501241,0.00039690823,0.0011583713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022727136,0.00031634656,0.00024736876,0.00051146484,0.00046540456,0.00050813355,0.00012730682,0.0005832429,0.002021711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070156755,0.00037337883,0.08127726,0.0008003348,0.00006246695,0.00040526807,0.020284181,0.0015763405,0.0010259452,0.8597185,0.02656953,0.007836643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061042677,0.00025279753,0.043022238,0.0018343395,0.00022964831,0.0008916003,0.007694608,0.0052091423,0.0003580712,0.14244074,0.7965673,0.00088905176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098196445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030258412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7699978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010207625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007014896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946873475","doi":"10.29173/alr2564","title":"Instrumental Rationality and General Deterrence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Office of National Drug Control Policy","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Supreme court; Rationality; Charter; Deterrence (psychology); Law; Deterrence theory; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027501699175308085,"score_gpt":0.33839006818190687,"score_spread":0.3108883690065988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946873475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57056683,0.03583131,0.0000040878467,0.02161943,0.000434424,0.0008045523,0.0000020479242,0.000023474631,0.3707138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745042,0.016712561,0.00012426048,0.0045448593,0.000067147565,0.000011474404,0.0000047174576,0.0000030685667,0.004027752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993062,0.000104872975,0.00013410191,0.00015864756,0.00016087454,0.00013533044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996237,0.00012570639,0.000042212378,0.00011936356,0.000015735735,0.00007326534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026620555,0.00005961886,0.00013489278,0.000003886326,0.00015978805,0.000039886087,0.00011818252,0.000024377918,0.0009381825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056923436,0.00005125692,0.0000373116,0.0000632134,0.00013714092,0.00027674052,0.000036776593,0.000044171855,0.00025294843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017414291,0.000008964971,0.010237613,0.00024014966,0.000003884203,4.7259283e-7,0.00023896515,4.8007987e-8,0.000032481108,0.97927123,0.0007330713,0.009231356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048441085,0.000015253435,0.0016304947,0.0006152827,0.0000191399,0.0000037318819,0.00002743541,0.000004765813,0.00001762538,0.00085879816,0.99666446,0.00009457848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017032715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0167523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015557098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003466811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946938629","doi":"10.7202/1058582ar","title":"La vérité et la liberté d’expression","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017289728657490584,"score_gpt":0.29124787502063976,"score_spread":0.2739581463631492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946938629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5123335,0.0021774487,0.000056826717,0.01077548,0.00079021364,0.00018876244,0.000013338911,0.00006235452,0.47360206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398517,0.0019598454,0.00060265063,0.0005083807,0.00047100725,0.000011487201,0.000005807031,0.000027967395,0.15656118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774474,0.00075241143,0.00025411756,0.0003938622,0.000296168,0.00055868464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840975,0.000808847,0.00012570195,0.00035653266,0.000051959585,0.00024720002],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013833296,0.00014636373,0.0002893303,0.000045450364,0.00016089593,0.0001626833,0.00044824978,0.00041576088,0.0013626543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016939224,0.00021341669,0.00019507039,0.00028503907,0.0003007122,0.00054086145,0.00012612126,0.00048693302,0.0026628715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006957949,0.00031625197,0.015605284,0.0010016736,0.000031184765,0.00034308675,0.023111755,0.00014490794,0.0048820176,0.87922025,0.019352024,0.055921983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002699853,0.00008765082,0.005447592,0.0018691296,0.000059015965,0.00012836908,0.0017424927,0.000222713,0.0005741306,0.047412634,0.9417994,0.00038687556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016323399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038739725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017508579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018327824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947096386","doi":"10.34632/catolicalawreview.2018.9101","title":"Extradition and trial delays: recent developments (and lessons?) from Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Charter; Law; Paragraph; Political science; Odds; Human rights; State (computer science); Medicine","score_opus":0.06710911780850506,"score_gpt":0.30087391331984226,"score_spread":0.2337647955113372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947096386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95103836,0.0009805416,0.000032044725,0.038416177,0.00055674266,0.00027857174,0.00004273696,0.000043283715,0.008611532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950702,0.00078900263,0.00053641427,0.002921133,0.00050063763,0.000013484185,0.000014786952,0.000007110591,0.000147239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885017,0.000113116635,0.00017769095,0.0002812345,0.0003502969,0.00022748584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926263,0.00013775993,0.000055088345,0.000071968054,0.000044237062,0.0004283289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021355553,0.00009744933,0.00014473259,0.000007867283,0.00050716015,0.00014019315,0.00013263906,0.0000638413,0.00036138433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030124665,0.000099552395,0.000015417125,0.000097877375,0.00012291386,0.000262799,0.000044847875,0.00013758577,0.000020439997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012172037,0.00025251703,0.023706226,0.0001817223,0.00032016973,0.00046713042,0.03965528,0.000015392354,0.0022689058,0.47916082,0.23652077,0.20527904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002850303,0.000055001492,0.0052361847,0.000044145705,0.000029479033,9.215351e-7,0.0019268367,0.000008490734,0.00020545413,0.0023541076,0.9870632,0.00022583318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8107557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9067022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75054246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012791193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005873801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40596288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947166640","doi":"10.7202/1058578ar","title":"Le recours collectif au Québec et aux États-Unis","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02878305176646637,"score_gpt":0.2939045417073459,"score_spread":0.26512148994087953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947166640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5873144,0.0018926071,0.000042367068,0.12429454,0.001741766,0.00031978948,0.000021151678,0.00006791071,0.28430545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74288267,0.0008262192,0.00026681312,0.0011271029,0.0006130718,0.000017796552,0.0000049667024,0.00003138632,0.25422996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997594,0.00033307535,0.0003479559,0.00050020224,0.00032838472,0.0008963688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984123,0.00047669592,0.00018201995,0.00043490098,0.00014142875,0.00035264777],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009791511,0.00018134677,0.00040983967,0.00007563166,0.0010466983,0.00014875962,0.0005590449,0.00025039978,0.0017055938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003241999,0.00029877492,0.00026201224,0.0006531309,0.000660797,0.00056520023,0.000094310344,0.00040709105,0.0031374563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011062492,0.00039477038,0.03665935,0.00074655947,0.00011026366,0.00020806676,0.062120236,0.0003097602,0.0005081295,0.80586624,0.063120574,0.029845402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047012707,0.00031357538,0.008309535,0.0008281605,0.00014607189,0.00010757393,0.011392995,0.00043742114,0.00019958908,0.0470327,0.930049,0.0007132576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6221382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62413865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015932452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071446816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947206550","doi":"10.7202/1059258ar","title":"À propos de l’affaire Vérificateur général du Canada : commentaires sur les documents du cabinet et la protection de leur caractère confidentiel par convention constitutionnelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Convention; Cabinet (room); Physics; Philosophy; Art; Law","score_opus":0.017508954320837582,"score_gpt":0.249051279445782,"score_spread":0.23154232512494444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947206550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94725543,0.00078198477,0.0006572714,0.035273865,0.0017199641,0.0013244435,0.00009087176,0.00008924036,0.012806921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98482335,0.0010793199,0.00008317189,0.0004633824,0.00049106876,0.00011585765,0.0000633839,0.000033892018,0.012846579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659324,0.0010150649,0.0005273104,0.0005266603,0.00045591313,0.0008818359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852693,0.00022067709,0.00036845848,0.00031086273,0.00022503015,0.00034803728],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014806178,0.0002727944,0.00041717108,0.00006855628,0.0007389218,0.00027239253,0.00043935055,0.00033370362,0.0005648397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002733935,0.00040303517,0.00019696391,0.00029266227,0.000587029,0.0007964452,0.0000849521,0.00052978506,0.00012865585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027728974,0.00063013483,0.55187696,0.002404654,0.00023022485,0.00068023783,0.008460099,0.0014175322,0.0039468487,0.39518386,0.027797582,0.0070945914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039227516,0.00060182065,0.10430944,0.0041383244,0.00086312334,0.0023073088,0.031113088,0.009786932,0.0050179535,0.021640573,0.81398535,0.0023133361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86075085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5985738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78618777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019195171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023324152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947210133","doi":"10.7202/1059296ar","title":"Le nouveau mandat d’enquête créé par la Loi sur le Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012519541661640692,"score_gpt":0.2255168654966934,"score_spread":0.2129973238350527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947210133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83749515,0.0016129527,0.00004073148,0.047012698,0.0008534554,0.000461332,0.000060149723,0.000063833206,0.11239971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569317,0.0012258727,0.00037827285,0.001529988,0.0007729914,0.00003597485,0.000020605568,0.000044912038,0.039059665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711233,0.00033787402,0.00041554068,0.0005878925,0.00035137293,0.0011950125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982744,0.00027193793,0.00020218948,0.0005361791,0.00019092968,0.0005243899],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012270501,0.00023529504,0.00044432556,0.00006470811,0.00058848935,0.0001845887,0.00074339384,0.00032051143,0.0006527991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010815659,0.0003765725,0.00019696497,0.00048416224,0.00026418414,0.0005168349,0.00016211167,0.00035301363,0.0009778395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016355759,0.00071439636,0.037877865,0.0027630804,0.00019269192,0.0012888769,0.06281608,0.0010415192,0.0019298786,0.8428747,0.03835596,0.009981395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008624911,0.00017775084,0.007417653,0.0010503854,0.00016618894,0.00027499,0.005818465,0.0015273651,0.00065434776,0.019441968,0.961832,0.0007764216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44193083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3939659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92347604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007002689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021974489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947236643","doi":"10.7202/1059254ar","title":"Expressions incitant à la violence : le droit américain, le droit canadien et l’affaire Dupuis c. La Société Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Montréal","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.01221494351065762,"score_gpt":0.25879010628338134,"score_spread":0.24657516277272373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947236643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.793309,0.009116416,0.0011517827,0.05343256,0.0010611457,0.0009096513,0.000280179,0.00023567598,0.1405036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548431,0.006323727,0.00111172,0.0011413147,0.0005540771,0.00008709253,0.000030875402,0.00009304535,0.035815068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947113,0.0010960207,0.00073330523,0.0010072296,0.0006431101,0.0018090771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956915,0.0017944452,0.0004097328,0.000860264,0.00024028985,0.0010037659],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024389974,0.00043467977,0.0008073114,0.00014151423,0.0009042362,0.0003005509,0.0012799859,0.0007090063,0.00042822395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010771145,0.00065864425,0.000513288,0.00066341786,0.00089620776,0.0008732531,0.00030786314,0.0010218838,0.0005897858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089104935,0.00039863348,0.0048822667,0.0005278086,0.000101710975,0.0011236655,0.014993979,0.0018582365,0.0017610871,0.93725145,0.008421761,0.028590271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019005992,0.0004921123,0.010195418,0.008367802,0.000417578,0.0008272642,0.058397625,0.008763496,0.00060612295,0.3649536,0.5424912,0.0025871708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5289874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27076745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5722979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028851489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00199629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947264233","doi":"10.7202/1059381ar","title":"LA DÉSOBÉISSANCE CIVILE EN CONTEXTE CANADIEN ET CONTEMPORAIN","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019214607826638943,"score_gpt":0.28551222077635774,"score_spread":0.2662976129497188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947264233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56163424,0.004124057,0.000067087516,0.027310241,0.0012197691,0.00041673693,0.00008075304,0.000054701635,0.4050924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84646064,0.0007194076,0.00018318712,0.00097156054,0.0004740931,0.000021216101,0.000009660854,0.000029799901,0.15113042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710834,0.0009512479,0.00035408078,0.0004844005,0.0002839304,0.0008180176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781746,0.0010920122,0.00018844317,0.00041068374,0.0000944157,0.00039697674],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026603076,0.00018673664,0.00044382992,0.000051469633,0.00020571805,0.00012692793,0.0005700521,0.0003430363,0.0013785696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044686883,0.00029481048,0.00019629345,0.00032625662,0.0004979315,0.0005159116,0.00008246121,0.0004969888,0.0017029232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052177784,0.000108560154,0.023627901,0.0005691464,0.000060716375,0.000456072,0.037801955,0.00008388709,0.0004455011,0.9003613,0.022136051,0.014296753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004161481,0.00016175544,0.0074179224,0.0012434224,0.000062968335,0.00013872657,0.0057955403,0.0002856676,0.00007337739,0.026484502,0.9574148,0.0005051552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06638893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10982114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007744388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051347225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947294769","doi":"10.7202/1059281ar","title":"La nouvelle compétence fédérale en matière de poursuite criminelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.020540159330230387,"score_gpt":0.2768219654922177,"score_spread":0.2562818061619873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947294769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6043112,0.0025179153,0.0003679466,0.022440543,0.0011604712,0.0003990858,0.00004300052,0.00009660555,0.3686632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7129755,0.0014430411,0.0024847237,0.0005445504,0.0010948488,0.00001710903,0.000008977282,0.00003915099,0.28139213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688464,0.00060438976,0.0004103824,0.0005523452,0.00039874355,0.0011495027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788386,0.00090867805,0.00017901814,0.0005178637,0.00010496432,0.00040559896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015421815,0.0002426088,0.00047746647,0.00007919612,0.00032372284,0.00017138384,0.0009117475,0.00045987917,0.006060593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024149822,0.00037711233,0.0002796989,0.0004511316,0.00049348426,0.0005077785,0.00018904271,0.00058277155,0.0062719546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001942686,0.0010150957,0.0641531,0.004529105,0.00018736252,0.0009389716,0.16365135,0.0015676831,0.007831115,0.56640875,0.0946778,0.09484538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008351756,0.00033574947,0.015343723,0.0026625867,0.00035586779,0.0005535286,0.029578656,0.0063113,0.0010088591,0.0530744,0.8885487,0.0013914965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073644654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012950343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79387087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008804367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038703717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947331614","doi":"10.7202/1059438ar","title":"DE L’IMPACT DE LA CHARTE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS DE LA PERSONNE SUR LE DROIT CIVIL DES CONTRATS ET DE LA RESPONSABILITÉ AU QUÉBEC","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Freedom of expression; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.019669125474096747,"score_gpt":0.3115153637882065,"score_spread":0.2918462383141097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947331614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154192,0.0041841986,0.0005160185,0.0053119184,0.00015287033,0.00043627774,0.000083569095,0.00015943279,0.07373651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974232,0.002215332,0.0011782416,0.00075811055,0.00048867054,0.00006378824,0.000009055648,0.00011032547,0.020944448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904683,0.005672492,0.00054278923,0.0007488634,0.00042885882,0.002138665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921263,0.008749329,0.000261864,0.0006005179,0.0001609166,0.0010147339],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011915518,0.00044919233,0.0007642315,0.00014191472,0.0007717443,0.0006453385,0.0008957848,0.00086280936,0.0005885574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042177695,0.0006284405,0.0005987818,0.0006035576,0.0029048547,0.0010425883,0.00013432385,0.0010723254,0.00021862159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077134673,0.0010518105,0.49564752,0.0012885148,0.00024419077,0.00085247,0.1931134,0.0012731308,0.020214098,0.2704151,0.0018144442,0.013313983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022199813,0.0008326977,0.6772223,0.0034688383,0.0004980786,0.0028739113,0.011080165,0.0032833922,0.0025441314,0.2442247,0.05003896,0.0017128465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43513712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25180236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18333477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060421247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101119485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947500724","doi":"10.7202/1058584ar","title":"La vérité et la législation sur la procédure civile en droit québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012898095204174405,"score_gpt":0.27293784835703233,"score_spread":0.26003975315285793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947500724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66945916,0.0018440121,0.00009876901,0.008365107,0.0005146441,0.00043951074,0.000037942777,0.000104125036,0.31913674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90550596,0.0014414355,0.00029612298,0.00029016807,0.000616937,0.000034463417,0.000021072357,0.00004684649,0.091746986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968197,0.0011348715,0.0003926351,0.00054897857,0.00044151352,0.0006623383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723476,0.0017808181,0.0002183187,0.0004048778,0.00012249616,0.0002387221],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025164601,0.00022289465,0.00040519112,0.0000828594,0.00017997129,0.00023715357,0.0005168518,0.000652409,0.0008828086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004979655,0.00034138115,0.0002528497,0.00046644802,0.0003266356,0.00091174024,0.000107450716,0.0006813804,0.0013133935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008305847,0.00043720007,0.048862394,0.0018273371,0.000088624074,0.00031015268,0.05136841,0.0004660674,0.0011038432,0.8227471,0.008412167,0.06429362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004994284,0.00015090185,0.032797527,0.0016354612,0.00016874167,0.0002636123,0.0034058944,0.0010468246,0.00013633393,0.04574648,0.9134485,0.0007002929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026877848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036719892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90503633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041927703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006667313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947516013","doi":"10.7202/1059187ar","title":"La vérité et la justice","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.023653906482414517,"score_gpt":0.30921302457960265,"score_spread":0.28555911809718815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947516013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41938737,0.002369874,0.000087393186,0.013745242,0.0011759541,0.00016844846,0.000016662874,0.00005403661,0.562995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85922265,0.0024064297,0.0005373744,0.0008017064,0.00068227603,0.000008514721,0.000004141147,0.0000237371,0.13631317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793226,0.00065613905,0.00023288725,0.00035064886,0.0002649846,0.0005630695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.001051173,0.00010770202,0.00031205534,0.00006419917,0.00022902871],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017047554,0.00013030019,0.0002664607,0.000039928287,0.00016261026,0.00015697502,0.0004279951,0.00033699852,0.0012567447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027960446,0.00020755135,0.00016726603,0.00032530155,0.00034789392,0.0004360781,0.00008708406,0.00046599284,0.0042256517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021258928,0.00011393036,0.0052018147,0.00093940203,0.000021517335,0.00020834892,0.008860484,0.00010689539,0.00019943363,0.9563476,0.0063539697,0.021625377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023074965,0.00008466171,0.0075475965,0.000905392,0.00026096628,0.00019674798,0.0042757457,0.00032162163,0.000043595526,0.043710914,0.94204605,0.00037593686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002266689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007772122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93569213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019450147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022662382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947522684","doi":"10.7202/1059298ar","title":"Évolution de la notion de « délai raisonnable » en matière de recours en évocation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0162890948952963,"score_gpt":0.2898395285926688,"score_spread":0.27355043369737253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947522684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85957193,0.0010537802,0.004583669,0.015049229,0.00087340915,0.00040960862,0.000015913962,0.0000963419,0.118346125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93513304,0.0017701972,0.0035784834,0.000240594,0.001916961,0.000036762838,0.000020255065,0.00003099945,0.057272676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971508,0.0010993937,0.00030378348,0.00035597253,0.000251536,0.0008385582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844384,0.0007748024,0.00017800122,0.00028113349,0.000088654524,0.0002335562],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035776696,0.00015347784,0.00025315667,0.000081272534,0.00028429524,0.00014890845,0.00037769985,0.00053288304,0.00068272883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007648176,0.00024723948,0.00015955164,0.000373341,0.00024347322,0.000674083,0.00004410623,0.00040767874,0.0012156203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019790835,0.000636811,0.14613925,0.0027270785,0.00011472641,0.00010204645,0.11057741,0.0073734964,0.021900041,0.5098959,0.018062556,0.18227278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001100124,0.0004359611,0.28664094,0.0036145374,0.00058947405,0.00052918,0.016381305,0.035993256,0.003306861,0.34346086,0.30650753,0.0014399914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01661581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022930668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28844497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041365544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063707324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947673921","doi":"10.7202/1059470ar","title":"Le précompte syndical obligatoire revu à la lumière de la décision de la Cour suprême américaine dans l’affaire Janus","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013914589812017321,"score_gpt":0.2938059647433079,"score_spread":0.27989137493129057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947673921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64336455,0.0040925858,0.0012575135,0.052141562,0.000425368,0.00039733946,0.0000448989,0.00012690369,0.29814926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92212886,0.0013614286,0.0008033065,0.00008427034,0.0003738977,0.00001613138,0.000015620635,0.00003414678,0.07518233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957518,0.0020978115,0.00047182405,0.00045918958,0.0005549975,0.0006643735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946042,0.004312264,0.00019469064,0.0003892569,0.000100864425,0.00039872705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026027916,0.00027350607,0.00034519663,0.00012653582,0.0011265611,0.00026341644,0.0005252115,0.0014909564,0.0005696716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001406385,0.00029885603,0.00020238056,0.00097654527,0.0018462102,0.0005280226,0.0001404307,0.0014985026,0.0005637407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003185946,0.0004100024,0.070097096,0.000032903703,0.00006429755,0.00018274171,0.011707876,0.0025076582,0.00018687111,0.8495486,0.04585899,0.019371111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047823624,0.000089450434,0.016578995,0.0009290162,0.00014709788,0.0002025331,0.020585032,0.0026584687,0.000098156845,0.008824939,0.94901025,0.00039783682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009083848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006740472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004451746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025031506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947708920","doi":"10.7202/1059283ar","title":"Le déroulement du procès pénal français (aperçus comparatifs avec le droit canadien)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.014743552705142573,"score_gpt":0.24401316719237356,"score_spread":0.229269614487231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947708920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8129889,0.0028416316,0.0002690457,0.02701934,0.0019371846,0.0008309011,0.00007188896,0.00008287615,0.15395823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93366224,0.00035800552,0.0004250852,0.00062659814,0.0012558122,0.00005538512,0.000028261431,0.00004440732,0.063544184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964367,0.00028003915,0.00061851216,0.000745044,0.0005624682,0.0013572508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981794,0.00020030663,0.00025091963,0.000553215,0.00019010955,0.0006260891],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001137481,0.0002903084,0.00063571514,0.000093488554,0.00075736234,0.00022179406,0.0008595454,0.00030315234,0.0018427839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000963514,0.00047503292,0.00031161023,0.0005378612,0.0005244192,0.00078143325,0.00013968027,0.000473763,0.0030607632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007741948,0.00048651584,0.032203373,0.00076738896,0.000119925426,0.00034945775,0.050114777,0.00061475637,0.00040403713,0.8947708,0.011106764,0.0089847585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015504996,0.00060096546,0.030286357,0.001271211,0.0002649949,0.00037402954,0.011549814,0.005422356,0.00069260417,0.042329848,0.9040553,0.001602043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30247048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28868577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8929485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011397583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015200052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947710438","doi":"10.7202/1059405ar","title":"LA COMMISSION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE DU QUÉBEC : CINQ ANNÉES DE LUTTE POUR LE DROIT À L’ÉGALITÉ","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017383015883573324,"score_gpt":0.267263502678603,"score_spread":0.24988048679502967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947710438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8369818,0.0043343008,0.00045031265,0.022127878,0.00027302143,0.0002526319,0.000024159262,0.00011744873,0.13543849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93779033,0.001351157,0.0014039748,0.00032014298,0.0009007548,0.00002134389,0.0000059783574,0.000063088366,0.058143254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962683,0.0011515405,0.00041510648,0.0005706574,0.00036078432,0.0012336407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971878,0.0013578972,0.00022175377,0.00045892806,0.00012939748,0.00064422487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028195665,0.00029172012,0.0005197625,0.00009977294,0.000831582,0.0002666888,0.0008175752,0.00056662393,0.00088210305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007529738,0.0004333967,0.00036203195,0.00047042975,0.0012865615,0.00060459337,0.00015254808,0.0006592191,0.0008421204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019100311,0.0008335561,0.34797516,0.0020599717,0.00013229412,0.0009146608,0.10034172,0.0005712922,0.009433846,0.48271877,0.013735597,0.041092135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018885164,0.000486722,0.21375197,0.0055558234,0.0005495198,0.0024272199,0.050230164,0.008721422,0.0026746732,0.2572256,0.4544757,0.0020126586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26068643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041385617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4407401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016475756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023371708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947806186","doi":"10.7202/1059346ar","title":"TROIS MOYENS DE DÉFENSE GÉNÉRALE : LA CONTRAINTE PHYSIQUE, LA CONTRAINTE PAR MENACES ET LA NÉCESSITÉ","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013610192011210585,"score_gpt":0.28477506804209446,"score_spread":0.27116487603088385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947806186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73419243,0.0027460912,0.0004497608,0.022112163,0.00061898684,0.0006517016,0.00015259435,0.00018049806,0.23889577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93494827,0.004229685,0.0006654415,0.0017238902,0.0007463638,0.00006641299,0.00002084644,0.00008324713,0.057515822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940359,0.0023758134,0.0006542326,0.00084599346,0.0005211596,0.001566914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952843,0.0028524161,0.00040946744,0.0006226874,0.00020057242,0.00063056435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037273697,0.00043503958,0.0009421063,0.00010698227,0.00036407926,0.00046678947,0.00089937466,0.0006548385,0.00070940395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006199965,0.00062126305,0.00059579284,0.00047413076,0.0014358871,0.000830676,0.00015432897,0.0009981578,0.0006997406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040460553,0.0006295194,0.017750943,0.001331106,0.00043400723,0.0015409709,0.053807326,0.0005750902,0.010606574,0.86622745,0.015935458,0.030756935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031508973,0.0005884432,0.03274003,0.004064082,0.00089051976,0.0011192845,0.015532853,0.002999013,0.0019818658,0.16757399,0.76704293,0.0023161117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075113606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005787854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75110745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006020122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007084349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947843570","doi":"10.7202/1059228ar","title":"Mining Claim Disputes in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statute; Excuse; Test (biology); Compliance (psychology); Seriousness; Rule of thumb; Political science; Business; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.026977943463461183,"score_gpt":0.27304859417342997,"score_spread":0.24607065070996878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947843570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841859,0.000052880594,0.0000100627885,0.0013092121,0.0001979599,0.000118009,4.986738e-7,0.000026379434,0.156426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97834706,0.000025753265,0.0004537459,0.00014588442,0.00012044193,0.0000075702796,0.0000022923543,0.0000067883916,0.020890448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991217,0.00004865713,0.00014171422,0.00019253707,0.00014474188,0.0003506163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995568,0.00013686651,0.00004194419,0.00015472352,0.00001953897,0.00009014846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046142045,0.000051526597,0.00014172698,0.00004640676,0.000089182286,0.000053642198,0.00022864678,0.00007935177,0.00072788255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008513932,0.00007748973,0.0000546722,0.0001428775,0.000056934867,0.00021651696,0.000032203556,0.00015278364,0.00034317325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014546326,0.000031189826,0.9102064,0.000032816955,0.0000038270036,0.000043900844,0.027154088,0.000040936447,0.000188088,0.059176464,0.0005764799,0.002531311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048177887,0.00011417878,0.71290267,0.0007115644,0.000027119473,0.000018747402,0.011417853,0.00023336476,0.00015283957,0.03753462,0.23584715,0.00055815675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17297533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7749134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.601938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004960647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021288014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83253187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947899387","doi":"10.7202/1059191ar","title":"Le Code de procédure pénale du Québec : éléments de problématique et de solution","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016778657376221168,"score_gpt":0.27318353212430285,"score_spread":0.2564048747480817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947899387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8572767,0.0016047348,0.0042795856,0.0836447,0.0003445966,0.0007524687,0.00003222853,0.000110066074,0.051954936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96046317,0.00092037243,0.0022246903,0.0016517264,0.0005413721,0.000085231346,0.000010018078,0.00003560848,0.0340678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974211,0.0005035683,0.0003438479,0.00041435863,0.00026972583,0.0010474132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987983,0.00021997411,0.00021901603,0.00029998954,0.00010903001,0.0003537019],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019437342,0.00018205044,0.00031420062,0.000048654474,0.00039230552,0.00013530535,0.00049531105,0.0003563995,0.00038167345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030049967,0.0002810823,0.00018753666,0.0002709826,0.00027477246,0.00058144314,0.00009811991,0.00044363708,0.0005373904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014587148,0.00081541785,0.21919452,0.0025211407,0.000108980224,0.0001528661,0.07777947,0.0024536299,0.0124220885,0.6577011,0.02175007,0.0049548564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017403414,0.0007108878,0.08850295,0.0051784934,0.0004880952,0.0009558495,0.008430387,0.02437718,0.006484393,0.13142969,0.7297703,0.001931449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15347365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20144843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7080202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024857267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005675561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947990800","doi":"10.7202/1058503ar","title":"Do Inferior Tribunals have the Power to declare a Law Unconstitutional? A case in support","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Charter; Law; Duty; Political science; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Legislature; Power (physics); Common law; Geography","score_opus":0.029238384044872518,"score_gpt":0.31477875234280983,"score_spread":0.28554036829793733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947990800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8486264,0.00007556233,0.00003713803,0.009635315,0.00018267837,0.0005203221,0.000034013745,0.000028333756,0.14086023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511904,0.000017073895,0.0001174478,0.0019077865,0.00011427349,0.00004508289,0.0000033678023,0.000007442529,0.0026684718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987311,0.00012153771,0.00022972937,0.00025418092,0.00023953327,0.0004239298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.00025480337,0.00005350957,0.00029087742,0.00008390561,0.0001762046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011773225,0.00008255148,0.00018879228,0.000056015106,0.00026831718,0.00013018177,0.0002990908,0.00009911443,0.0012085639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032426993,0.00008972359,0.000095096155,0.00027729422,0.00019756971,0.00022902439,0.00006716888,0.00017605026,0.00067611254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047811922,0.0000564193,0.056441195,0.000033885906,0.000010755851,0.0018067845,0.014416479,0.00012789466,0.000103195365,0.9239972,0.0024397052,0.0005186519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005940663,0.00018988243,0.011176014,0.00034150432,0.000045748457,0.001663317,0.017097235,0.00002793116,0.00013843938,0.042893264,0.925277,0.0005556072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073991106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046746425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92283726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002994813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032260234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948005597","doi":"10.7202/1059403ar","title":"LES TRIBUNAUX ET LA PROTECTION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE AU CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.021947298133521226,"score_gpt":0.2862527807053273,"score_spread":0.2643054825718061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948005597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8321089,0.0008703679,0.00022078172,0.005139976,0.0004701686,0.00032240854,0.000024878545,0.000040167844,0.16080236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658103,0.00041836922,0.00030943588,0.00014261466,0.00057839416,0.0000335009,0.00000453375,0.00002544808,0.032677386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997615,0.0008365489,0.00021674145,0.00033330166,0.00028682995,0.0007115879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881345,0.00050870003,0.00012434559,0.00020274209,0.000090171015,0.0002605695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017451904,0.00015004652,0.0002606638,0.000041321015,0.00044665768,0.0001355169,0.00029743687,0.000296084,0.0004233832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004685123,0.00022762327,0.00012663829,0.0003498097,0.00043926458,0.00035303374,0.000044544624,0.00044993602,0.00010681847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009919361,0.0001954373,0.062043585,0.0018365781,0.00007602336,0.00033099978,0.03108431,0.0007833154,0.0018894942,0.8162335,0.0018055127,0.083622016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009382135,0.0004125909,0.16179933,0.0033386755,0.0002966091,0.0009985243,0.019964205,0.0023213516,0.0011950799,0.07886056,0.7285881,0.00128678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9425976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89694524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.737373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002653595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020911985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92822075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948007502","doi":"10.7202/1058583ar","title":"Du droit de l’État à la vérité au droit à la vérité de l’État","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics; Political science","score_opus":0.01597913899252085,"score_gpt":0.26497626830222454,"score_spread":0.2489971293097037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948007502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7450442,0.0030114152,0.0006195679,0.016638048,0.001354591,0.00058405736,0.00006769341,0.00020543662,0.23247503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8998729,0.0040824935,0.0012868205,0.0010237747,0.002379708,0.000063924315,0.00002154514,0.00011897421,0.09114985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939442,0.00096522894,0.00079160207,0.001064583,0.0007448925,0.002489472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957743,0.001706602,0.0003774758,0.0008876916,0.00019028252,0.0010635951],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037599057,0.00049588014,0.0009062577,0.000171255,0.0006992073,0.0004664931,0.0014633095,0.0010202957,0.0014316383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077440357,0.00079579477,0.0006546032,0.0009075644,0.0011242467,0.0009273469,0.00028641423,0.0011551721,0.0034225816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017813458,0.00063890225,0.10174839,0.0016279242,0.00017547615,0.0017358188,0.023494901,0.0005464177,0.0021084356,0.82266134,0.011078155,0.034006096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015513105,0.00049248536,0.042726237,0.0028357753,0.0006613492,0.002219613,0.0072368323,0.0038811527,0.0009828871,0.3749815,0.56033635,0.0020945156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015945844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005316767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54925823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025256863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014184288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948260689","doi":"","title":"License to Kill","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student Research Proceedings","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.24423694469833657,"score_gpt":0.49975837657728645,"score_spread":0.2555214318789499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948260689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6426945,0.0000065079835,0.00001013614,0.014296414,0.000085100066,0.000368755,0.0000015577702,0.000082760955,0.34245428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94593805,0.00005237436,0.00023070809,0.00018601665,0.0004754082,0.0000015557214,2.481333e-7,0.0000068154086,0.053108796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727565,0.00008065184,0.00007813583,0.0003799098,0.0014228168,0.00076283317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783224,0.000100912,0.00002381113,0.00010691854,0.001430469,0.0005056394],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023249097,0.00008623654,0.00010869439,0.00030994226,0.0023682008,0.00024071708,0.0010033104,0.00007266838,0.0005384325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047268518,0.000095105686,0.000043824457,0.0012791158,0.00085253065,0.00039360792,0.0006346983,0.00025952034,0.001240927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034381647,0.00022293573,0.044328492,0.000036382644,0.00003490854,0.00007457647,0.2715264,1.5960941e-7,0.0025208928,0.2647592,0.41114983,0.0050024143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011933273,0.0002647527,0.012742364,0.000037481484,0.0000059300687,6.472085e-7,0.12740825,0.0000011442826,0.0002568519,0.00017304384,0.8588812,0.00010903409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055427398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004623512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44773135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049729005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001750587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948261530","doi":"10.21991/cf29383","title":"Constitutionalizing (In)justice: Treaty Interpretation and the Containment of Indigenous Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Political science; Treaty; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Colonialism; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.011877901389146147,"score_gpt":0.28299654782823386,"score_spread":0.27111864643908773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948261530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4679902,0.014593078,0.04022637,0.03457916,0.0052843913,0.005444039,0.000410179,0.00019648923,0.4312761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791896,0.00066237804,0.0002630473,0.00066045584,0.00006433288,0.000070432165,0.000016132324,0.0000047427243,0.00033953285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759746,0.0002012,0.00062200095,0.00039281533,0.0006535241,0.00053302053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982298,0.0008495218,0.00030532168,0.00024239854,0.0002486515,0.00012428054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011293133,0.00022064503,0.00040932826,0.000108406515,0.0010514561,0.000083454266,0.00033099452,0.00014906238,0.0002032884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007682382,0.00018079337,0.00014710266,0.00032733413,0.0126868775,0.0007267175,0.000117929194,0.00024237995,0.00007003212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040181394,0.00006344539,0.041415397,0.000055120825,0.00003590256,0.000008825461,0.0018410041,0.000785501,0.00006528411,0.9540058,0.00019308885,0.0011288535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.032602277,0.0005208756,0.049256198,0.0049401317,0.0010851879,0.00072363997,0.12632035,0.006608494,0.00066228356,0.29078966,0.48359355,0.0028973653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028276488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030919937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6632161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004168574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018009621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950743607","doi":"10.17062/cjil.v5i1.84","title":"Disrupting Law, Reclaiming Justice – Remarks, Responses, and Summary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10108331889861627,"score_gpt":0.3740073523353142,"score_spread":0.2729240334366979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950743607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76385593,0.007887214,0.0004012085,0.059895467,0.0025052174,0.0003243757,0.0000049391833,0.000058732516,0.1650669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124056,0.00021603717,0.0013183854,0.00046604412,0.00085201097,0.0000011660461,0.0000010418782,0.000021516771,0.0058832653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755615,0.0005544681,0.0005953957,0.00025709442,0.000551203,0.00048566313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974743,0.0013376538,0.00044107775,0.00020871106,0.0002296737,0.00030856556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003068921,0.00018337203,0.0003651622,0.00017505533,0.0008615487,0.00019232385,0.00047371327,0.00014816214,0.00026054026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004614287,0.00015842191,0.00017149824,0.00019810032,0.0005448135,0.0011218992,0.0002451911,0.0005925618,0.000041325617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012533934,0.0005188028,0.018587632,0.003377493,0.00042387296,0.0029353218,0.38372362,0.000067321525,0.013355715,0.45562744,0.058424722,0.05042412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016556195,0.0020620606,0.00597652,0.00876291,0.0006924326,0.0013955428,0.8111917,0.00013002295,0.0011617063,0.024864806,0.1409299,0.001176796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007981503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027599797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43076265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016612872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018695838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6626423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950821204","doi":"","title":"L'INDEPENDANCE JUDICIAIRE : FONDEMENT DU PRINCIPE ET SON APPLICATION AUX TRIBUNAUX ADMINISTRATIFS","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionality; Political science; Charter; Constitution; Judicial independence; Legislature; Independence (probability theory); Parliament; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.052851209967884276,"score_gpt":0.35544119216988096,"score_spread":0.3025899822019967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950821204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011068339,0.28126347,0.00012598446,0.6896361,0.00044281443,0.001385027,0.000037815673,0.000025517447,0.025976436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7812712,0.1888842,0.00009860392,0.025922416,0.00045046431,0.00016515474,0.000022126485,0.00002249786,0.0031633046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975414,0.000388336,0.00047675267,0.00039473816,0.0005112478,0.0006874935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982576,0.00008324748,0.00023082414,0.000553098,0.00018804312,0.0006871856],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025406135,0.00024480396,0.0003771275,0.000028335317,0.0013123539,0.00012410132,0.00077967317,0.00013954737,0.000969199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033150485,0.0002083478,0.0001737902,0.0005129611,0.00053899095,0.00028514676,0.000042561576,0.0003492587,0.0016933263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002511953,0.000029375859,0.00008918781,0.00077108934,0.000017759525,0.00002553747,0.0012129855,0.000015934678,0.0000018715906,0.88848597,0.014436793,0.09491102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011059663,0.00006307151,0.0016402637,0.0039409655,0.00020349592,0.000025276797,0.00017063564,0.0000073892434,0.000008881871,0.00898658,0.98459923,0.00024362834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63781714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9701624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017061234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074356915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952789473","doi":"","title":"The New Law of Criminal Organizations in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Convention; Criminology; Organised crime; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.030980766265372914,"score_gpt":0.3077849890407311,"score_spread":0.27680422277535816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952789473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055814665,0.19280621,0.000017255454,0.5425027,0.0005950235,0.0010616183,0.000014758799,0.000012295904,0.25740865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746575,0.016498946,0.000016161763,0.0072772047,0.00008654655,0.000001731135,0.0000011428297,0.0000054017332,0.001455401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991782,0.000095138945,0.00018684365,0.000061913845,0.0001997894,0.00027813224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922913,0.00021489986,0.000046074463,0.00017827723,0.000086132415,0.00024550082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278842,0.00004495512,0.00009806343,0.000011396666,0.00060473994,0.000019612457,0.0004028112,0.000015723717,0.00033302204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051861105,0.000028231429,0.000018096265,0.0004438674,0.00015908938,0.00003988951,0.000010394649,0.00008229391,0.000021173259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.187481e-7,0.0000011685459,0.0005120008,0.00008230798,0.0000030155918,0.000010699195,0.0013285636,0.0000017994204,8.030579e-7,0.91765815,0.06427351,0.016127177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012832191,0.0000021828987,0.0018551542,0.00032221872,0.000021084745,0.000001576887,0.00092930975,3.7916655e-7,0.0000048560883,0.00045032636,0.9963604,0.000039641043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99993074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070248096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009816421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952856709","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: SOC215 - Canadian Justice System: Finding Articles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08714474745084512,"score_gpt":0.34520902552870547,"score_spread":0.25806427807786037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952856709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085311866,0.001235073,0.000048006357,0.008673798,0.0056904145,0.00034904733,0.00008190016,0.00034700235,0.9827216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31391385,0.0009462749,0.0016039421,0.0030733405,0.01646869,0.00004994727,0.00007314725,0.00010918949,0.6637616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971099,0.0002212669,0.0004352889,0.00048699524,0.00071080547,0.0010357826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793106,0.00043565166,0.00016680549,0.00037951634,0.00031419942,0.0007727504],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014451896,0.00027400488,0.00037720284,0.00025848445,0.001996809,0.00055968104,0.00089648896,0.0005539009,0.0028761844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011334554,0.0002584678,0.00014712528,0.00036886224,0.00051557895,0.0003452785,0.00007816261,0.00029040014,0.0025261284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025037202,0.0000044730405,0.000044945984,0.0004490633,0.00002067738,0.000050676823,0.0041114995,5.428375e-7,0.0000017254481,0.062412314,0.93193406,0.0009675423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003771437,0.000026347008,0.000026283002,0.00073375966,0.0003532547,0.00000546394,0.035204183,0.0000225703,0.000016314636,0.00041122653,0.96280736,0.00035551927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9174589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95994145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31896004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010066227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029675972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952879402","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v9i2.8069","title":"Assessing the Damage: Money Awards by the OHRT in Sexual Harassment Cases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Damages; Entitlement (fair division); Psychology; Tribunal; Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10727226551777226,"score_gpt":0.44547524043829306,"score_spread":0.3382029749205208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952879402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594457,0.0049898103,0.000010643814,0.033661675,0.00061671034,0.000112658854,0.0000015088474,0.000005094422,0.0011561862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968702,0.00044294167,0.000014587997,0.00045840058,0.0003206251,0.00000262702,1.11802876e-7,0.0000055767478,0.0018848852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.0003710916,0.00034256224,0.000104601764,0.00063899095,0.00025352978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986312,0.00077998935,0.00025802388,0.000119089826,0.00016337438,0.00004832229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022265206,0.0001041074,0.00024067456,0.000029811681,0.0005097121,0.00037673826,0.00043020872,0.000028770688,0.00001808111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031950112,0.00005217804,0.00006328208,0.0001397736,0.00033220084,0.0008284821,0.0001028396,0.0003218109,0.000014471018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009269575,0.0001867552,0.8558108,0.000065878936,0.00031782387,0.00042478266,0.08452632,0.00020189813,0.00070237747,0.0015436424,0.03612671,0.02000027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045820486,0.0003698279,0.16992947,0.00033304002,0.00010986066,0.00012746408,0.39776126,0.000010079131,0.000116333926,0.00019457763,0.43036896,0.00022091217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033204153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006713964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6858814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015158152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001549087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50194967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953029123","doi":"","title":"INTERRELATED POLICE INVESTIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Law; Interrogation; Work (physics); Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.1315689610285244,"score_gpt":0.32624042227241323,"score_spread":0.19467146124388884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953029123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021952357,0.11829476,0.0000031535783,0.32224125,0.0002640636,0.0009374504,0.000018649182,0.00006048452,0.5362278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96679664,0.02369599,0.000045409444,0.007519824,0.000054259108,0.000012388893,0.0000016519126,0.0000051614143,0.0018687008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994533,0.00014231421,0.00008940848,0.000075352,0.00007309031,0.00016651393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945974,0.00003061341,0.000026577125,0.00013239932,0.00003097647,0.00031970866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049182255,0.00004627636,0.00007903221,0.000017216214,0.0005484863,0.000026599322,0.00019519971,0.000027888978,0.0006548854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017463505,0.00003180875,0.000023726718,0.00015371044,0.000350499,0.00008861077,0.000013012328,0.00008569281,0.00016776976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.1678695e-7,0.0000042639444,0.0029100059,0.0002531735,0.000017561846,0.0000054288676,0.04634812,2.9725639e-8,0.0000013884033,0.86490023,0.07037403,0.015184937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012496946,0.0000059484473,0.0034685032,0.0008634833,0.000053002226,0.0000040316827,0.0005345352,6.5003456e-7,9.687566e-7,0.0023978532,0.99259424,0.0000643006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89063805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97808844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94484425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006195061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033284642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7170536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953762600","doi":"","title":"L'appréhension du territoire penal par le Canada et la France","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009086713970331962,"score_gpt":0.20830179990544637,"score_spread":0.19921508593511442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953762600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7212933,0.0046412777,0.00022882716,0.07371197,0.003874352,0.00035821387,0.00015668891,0.00018166317,0.19555373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8692911,0.004030177,0.00023500924,0.0009013929,0.0007964416,5.9677666e-7,0.000024477775,0.000042939948,0.12467786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996201,0.0007157112,0.00026974734,0.000858952,0.0009783491,0.00097628793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975289,0.00042510367,0.00030123538,0.0005218537,0.0005371646,0.0006857078],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052920706,0.0004903422,0.0005175477,0.000165059,0.002821452,0.000121641686,0.0012247942,0.00040690895,0.00034775998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078782294,0.0006160588,0.00027241942,0.0010420883,0.0016506691,0.001228291,0.0005640683,0.0005793865,0.00010552152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085175596,0.00060820306,0.044215817,0.00027416964,0.00039926142,0.0076162624,0.09167749,0.00014560117,0.01038865,0.5360288,0.19965377,0.10814023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010449629,0.00026215022,0.013274328,0.0003570789,0.0002532453,0.00011863898,0.012684259,0.0002377737,0.002587632,0.0004005748,0.96805406,0.00072529505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76840025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012140354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004227666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954662585","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2019v44n2a3555","title":"The Unfulfilled Promise of Press Freedom in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.022038389069013162,"score_gpt":0.26113127747698134,"score_spread":0.23909288840796816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954662585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95423675,0.004352691,0.0000025042684,0.012534602,0.00028053674,0.00017745045,0.0000030068777,8.0750544e-7,0.02841165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991917,0.00043589648,0.000045668894,0.000028705523,0.00001648551,0.0000010163058,3.3019953e-7,0.000002203237,0.00027801568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992064,0.00023333913,0.00023888689,0.000026630682,0.0001657069,0.00012901553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887484,0.00031878645,0.00021107658,0.00024944893,0.0002028016,0.00014306801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090242,0.00002957363,0.00008848678,0.00003290526,0.00017371205,0.00002836732,0.00073001324,0.000020925692,0.000046712943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030764425,0.000023295946,0.000022944909,0.000097700446,0.00012187177,0.00012907186,0.000010561747,0.00013567765,0.0000011903388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002586486,0.00005489261,0.4641978,0.000080874604,0.00010630775,0.000039372728,0.07544636,0.0058361883,0.00032862264,0.32389325,0.056728747,0.07302894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047006484,0.000043027256,0.07309928,0.0003300775,0.000018185212,0.000006241013,0.022428356,0.00030310612,0.00009807114,0.0022717738,0.9008086,0.00012326422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99740887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8440798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005174033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008256234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955041574","doi":"","title":"Acts of the Parliament of the Dominion of Canada relating to criminal law and to procedure in criminal cases","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Dominion; Law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025792686856163507,"score_gpt":0.27162973995952444,"score_spread":0.24583705310336093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955041574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81489193,0.00005173357,2.7286578e-7,0.0022469626,0.00018416771,0.0003825113,0.00003778531,0.0000014645539,0.18220317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982186,0.0000149914995,0.00013291852,0.00056230935,0.00007677517,0.0000095463065,2.614061e-7,0.0000068268305,0.0009777542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858946,0.000104182036,0.0003790813,0.00016710653,0.00044065845,0.00031953742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894804,0.0001880641,0.00018543322,0.00023166827,0.00016829881,0.0002785008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044826994,0.00010099427,0.00022357333,0.00009446276,0.00021683963,0.000008114282,0.00036735463,0.000058089907,0.000026310692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000828277,0.00007445367,0.000040457206,0.0003229929,0.00042573528,0.00007062133,0.00007032885,0.00008552746,2.5973125e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035866836,0.000097516946,0.10464073,0.0011636599,0.00004685317,0.000037617887,0.20358208,0.00009431276,0.0022291215,0.6563899,0.025149498,0.006210058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041844803,0.00055942166,0.3170654,0.0021632656,0.00019083734,0.000016381367,0.04325323,0.0000063642788,0.010350372,0.00092909933,0.6245975,0.00044973224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99508405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6554608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016120268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029595173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52500564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295536601","doi":"10.20381/ruor-23674","title":"Why There Should Be No Constitutional Right to Contact Counsel from a Police Car","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Law; Charter; Constitutional right; Supreme court; Political science; Right to privacy; Principal (computer security); Right to counsel; Constitutional law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.212490332066596,"score_gpt":0.3745199890871766,"score_spread":0.1620296570205806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295536601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97922736,0.00009187934,0.00054225366,0.005945581,0.00074026344,0.00035839912,0.00019395749,0.00018778637,0.012712502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856577,0.00003821989,0.000062644045,0.005899832,0.00048404624,0.0000018071609,0.000029445317,0.000018598766,0.0078076953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971266,0.00045764906,0.00022041636,0.00058627786,0.0009933717,0.000615678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997606,0.00026504174,0.00012539572,0.00042321364,0.0005905033,0.0009898881],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064167555,0.00028598186,0.0003323869,0.00021226623,0.00068868796,0.0004414914,0.001104284,0.00027511333,0.00027095337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001624916,0.00030821215,0.00013584978,0.00046634386,0.0006057224,0.0020528913,0.00021820974,0.00044170348,0.0011196771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046178672,0.00014968187,0.96675396,0.000017572007,0.00010442824,0.00038490017,0.014353254,0.00001989746,0.00078839506,0.016085314,0.0008084198,0.00007236589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009006488,0.00015717816,0.08422204,0.00019463681,0.00012177096,0.000007802888,0.005597326,1.2931609e-7,0.00037830876,0.00038838308,0.90747666,0.00055510906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068221167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13973962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90666825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006425343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075898896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956273921","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0038","title":"The <i>Charter</i> and Criminal Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Duty; Arbitrariness; Discretion; Economic Justice; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057569177977399105,"score_gpt":0.2766184970796385,"score_spread":0.21904931910223938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956273921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005074463,0.00026565723,0.000021760769,0.00036978396,0.00036584525,0.00019510213,0.00002485197,0.00004608864,0.99866015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020769667,0.0036185868,0.000031681157,0.000062048966,0.00029526165,3.5166707e-7,0.0000017215124,0.000013197878,0.9939002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998973,0.000044831824,0.00009115031,0.0002854593,0.00031859725,0.0002869277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988945,0.00023234742,0.00018772407,0.00040415977,0.00011219369,0.00016906371],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028574833,0.0001800728,0.0001785658,0.000028849176,0.0037990417,0.00027907593,0.00078283896,0.00022999864,0.00001700552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040129165,0.00016445336,0.000095051335,0.0000014048911,0.0013623879,0.00015343972,0.00029589917,0.0003085628,0.0000021582996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060243823,0.0000016332358,7.638261e-7,0.000052993855,0.000023198385,0.00007179178,0.002478658,5.3576777e-8,0.0000011501797,0.9742959,0.005073029,0.017940553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010211336,0.000027980035,0.0000050474555,0.00010791428,0.0006559972,0.0000038503795,0.0014277393,0.0000019358624,0.0000026945888,0.0019052558,0.995557,0.00020246071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009501692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020683755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007356849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013991955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956679824","doi":"","title":"Comparaison de la nouvelle California Consumer Privacy Act avec le cadre juridique canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.015906095685237518,"score_gpt":0.27465764178012464,"score_spread":0.2587515460948871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956679824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8781358,0.007795358,0.0027943861,0.013901669,0.0010746262,0.0009404029,0.0000641647,0.00013942223,0.095154196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8721108,0.0014396111,0.0013575071,0.00095097016,0.00027246567,0.000041558975,0.000012294822,0.000074617354,0.12374018],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486583,0.0016340488,0.0005809469,0.0007648456,0.0005389679,0.0016153271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966888,0.0015158259,0.00025307745,0.0005754796,0.00021230878,0.0007545236],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021435986,0.0005188516,0.0006707069,0.00016090645,0.0011806436,0.00024923167,0.001041743,0.0010957585,0.0044168937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011416852,0.00055086357,0.0003375,0.0006590105,0.002646981,0.0002882425,0.00019454469,0.0018213629,0.002172041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011244023,0.0011588337,0.06163878,0.0018516212,0.0006755595,0.000602885,0.45031986,0.0010871879,0.0061889524,0.1648089,0.2326209,0.07792212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005957502,0.00022667619,0.0006654451,0.000335634,0.00013082578,0.00014244416,0.014103625,0.0025562707,0.008040071,0.0031060835,0.96932966,0.0007675275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14690013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023396002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73670876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00244987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004634995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960765459","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jly012","title":"Reflections on Themes from The Realm of Criminal Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Criminal law; Law; Politics; Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Retributive justice; Public law; Political science; Social science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.22764602111522103,"score_gpt":0.5030289001686215,"score_spread":0.2753828790534004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960765459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01426541,0.40148905,0.0000061399614,0.04444165,0.00083179225,0.00054821966,0.000042227402,0.000047975045,0.5383275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7817598,0.21379037,0.0002655611,0.0026577339,0.000771609,0.000023964223,0.0000013087722,0.0000069013863,0.00072274386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986176,0.0002593331,0.00035590385,0.00016789972,0.00042791807,0.00017135096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982775,0.0007889557,0.00021864443,0.00027105992,0.00041104932,0.000032799446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076279585,0.00010323052,0.00037083664,0.000012850723,0.00063819287,0.000013612594,0.0003263048,0.00002801769,0.00013882085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010017756,0.000060480445,0.00014477983,0.00022924886,0.001643979,0.00012081543,0.00007894581,0.00009492707,0.000042588832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003843019,0.0000774315,0.00013873896,0.0010891302,0.0001457801,0.0000019593683,0.01975525,8.451401e-8,0.00010478647,0.8925119,0.07679199,0.0093445275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045509445,0.00022373846,0.0006261577,0.005537452,0.00022290114,5.33791e-7,0.011278578,8.7312344e-8,0.0004187548,0.0027297568,0.97883683,0.00007971876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151406685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017161474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90204483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003887753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006486186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961168636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0057","title":"A new legal science with an old aftertaste","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Scholarship; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Criminal justice; Argumentative; Normative; Criticism; Criminal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010563075363505973,"score_gpt":0.248315783896043,"score_spread":0.23775270853253702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961168636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.651145,0.00013350825,0.00042023236,0.0010113132,0.00030708543,0.000088649285,0.0000011214961,0.000018462322,0.34687462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869175,0.000048034453,0.0037814248,0.000050506984,0.000097405595,5.229717e-9,1.1359902e-7,0.0000024248377,0.007328326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989992,0.000046912613,0.000058862795,0.00013671412,0.00052372226,0.00023459188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992623,0.000018479135,0.00008658184,0.00012889718,0.00016587954,0.00033788552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046810502,0.000055068173,0.0001004535,0.0000175394,0.00086185674,0.000105674066,0.000561721,0.000028731183,0.0025003892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008162193,0.000052255462,0.00004000068,0.000056684432,0.00047726417,0.0030637276,0.000042995347,0.00008719067,0.000020937252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001031133,0.00011831347,0.011254504,0.000017863918,0.00003856528,0.00017166305,0.055396177,0.000066197405,0.0020846247,0.912519,0.0021266635,0.015175345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011751017,0.0012297845,0.011453256,0.00019737754,0.00007379921,0.000086288244,0.09430077,0.00004533379,0.00020501686,0.00064312434,0.8902611,0.00032905213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.490849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.611426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91187584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002910998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005160231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962852945","doi":"","title":"Éducaloi - Espace jeunesse","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Public space; Art; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03286930031846414,"score_gpt":0.3186110627488826,"score_spread":0.2857417624304185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962852945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10456294,0.008885394,0.0003877847,0.21077661,0.002977064,0.0001071569,0.000003345328,0.000086422726,0.67221326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5293719,0.0001593898,0.00038816937,0.00028181175,0.0009596395,0.0000021008589,8.909546e-7,0.00000517294,0.46883094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875534,0.00011081624,0.00015853342,0.00022378091,0.00030475855,0.00044679755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946237,0.00015785632,0.000043422904,0.00015054077,0.000067636356,0.000118165684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003546607,0.00011328749,0.00012869714,0.000020971936,0.00034298908,0.00010526411,0.00020617226,0.00012289264,0.006410326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052897223,0.000110160436,0.00008640445,0.00033889996,0.00056926446,0.00037122512,0.000038544018,0.00010316731,0.0031218797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046665414,0.00008361735,0.0007011951,0.000021370828,0.000002541809,0.000016640433,0.0012445784,0.000012968547,0.000054205902,0.7721532,0.21927284,0.0064321794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056282122,0.000019676885,0.002232401,0.000041066676,0.000028601662,0.000003907249,0.0036647252,0.000033016415,0.00019018543,0.019331338,0.9742326,0.00016620333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11292866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050154775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75495976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095725256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011616126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965865542","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0022","title":"Criminal Law in the Federal Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Jurisdiction; Constitution; Federal jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Parliament; Criminal law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Federalism; Criminal jurisdiction; Section (typography); Federal law; Legislation; Business; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.08337311197529869,"score_gpt":0.2876290359989117,"score_spread":0.20425592402361303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965865542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001241126,0.00007695199,0.000007208633,0.00047173706,0.00019337448,0.00030488698,0.000020617264,0.000032573436,0.9987685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09746132,0.00018981399,0.00001510895,0.00029465902,0.00019210126,6.2452557e-7,0.0000042519155,0.000011215142,0.9018309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876213,0.00009888896,0.00011447898,0.0002919762,0.00042241722,0.00031013147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990793,0.00015147132,0.00016799952,0.0004320825,0.000077567434,0.00009160109],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037672275,0.00019576502,0.0002427395,0.000046410885,0.0016444217,0.00025023957,0.0013162316,0.00029208735,0.00006355361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019685083,0.00018159449,0.00016226596,0.0000022869474,0.0011037716,0.00019716015,0.00018313059,0.00045913973,0.0000039914617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006575008,0.000005891765,0.0000045637776,0.000021397595,0.000013269361,0.00025929965,0.0076913736,1.6162191e-7,3.4150392e-7,0.9840827,0.0027025575,0.0051526977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017984667,0.000032825563,0.000015457186,0.00014860684,0.000084059866,0.0000033196293,0.0030551765,7.792315e-7,0.0000020812047,0.005933956,0.9903253,0.00021859049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020367317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06738194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98762274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014724542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015968399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965982429","doi":"","title":"What (is) a Nuisance? Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister of Transportation)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Truck; Political science; Engineering; Law; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.049560778947759204,"score_gpt":0.3123423020960813,"score_spread":0.26278152314832215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965982429","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055482216,0.549288,0.0000021235282,0.33890966,0.0017261206,0.0016870473,0.00007696372,0.000028241815,0.052799664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279778,0.051177222,0.000032164422,0.010570174,0.00015685165,0.000009178811,0.000009463806,0.000008643223,0.010058505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989502,0.00011878292,0.000222125,0.00010030284,0.00023294243,0.00037565306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920434,0.00005339447,0.000086064974,0.00021993261,0.00007123687,0.00036502967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076137023,0.000084306164,0.00020839681,0.000018565646,0.00030899447,0.000046057332,0.0002837009,0.000043212833,0.005318932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032214615,0.000062249506,0.000106119725,0.0001474999,0.0001843985,0.0004505143,0.0000029663706,0.00009607884,0.0002566375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016382259,0.00005771213,0.05110124,0.0023204435,0.00007378898,0.000023155304,0.32326415,3.1298669e-7,0.000004005486,0.3215239,0.21364036,0.08797452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031829444,0.00000492433,0.010020329,0.0014212158,0.00008857791,0.0000010985985,0.00096479227,3.9522817e-8,0.000006428921,0.00013040227,0.98724884,0.000081495506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7802928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99581116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8724956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002738544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093797717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970283393","doi":"10.29173/mlj1002","title":"Robson Crim: A Vision for Multivalent Interrogations of Criminal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminal law; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Publication; Notice; Variety (cybernetics); Jurisprudence; Legislature; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.1109177424403509,"score_gpt":0.4143466183227221,"score_spread":0.3034288758823712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970283393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8276777,0.0003429859,0.004571427,0.0151862195,0.0039022525,0.00077586964,0.0000368777,0.00006154331,0.14744513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702257,0.00004476851,0.0018975085,0.00011795589,0.00074856606,0.0000078496205,0.000001054691,0.00000964376,0.00015005846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987939,0.0000914989,0.00029620848,0.00014265077,0.00038531303,0.00029041283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874735,0.00014492068,0.0003595735,0.00023984238,0.0003500523,0.00015828632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091242086,0.000097858385,0.00017176014,0.00003261289,0.004264188,0.00048643173,0.00061613886,0.00006887083,0.00008619378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003306603,0.00008660586,0.00017554345,0.000021432448,0.000650823,0.00078250415,0.0000810828,0.00017363505,0.000015728496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019114545,0.00022759182,0.0006246796,0.00009008234,0.000035562138,0.000023588887,0.00918945,0.000011887621,0.0015613897,0.9537324,0.0029226504,0.031389624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023034385,0.0012958604,0.014885334,0.0014341627,0.000538199,0.00012038748,0.19420119,0.00035938295,0.006187759,0.08665569,0.69131327,0.00070531486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4855302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86707664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112684545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060991595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970698243","doi":"","title":"A Treatise on the Criminal Law of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.013062235972318531,"score_gpt":0.2119529821214523,"score_spread":0.19889074614913377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970698243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000080338905,0.00013000984,2.1778277e-8,0.0022680112,0.00012698815,0.00031847178,0.0000615558,0.000021759652,0.9969928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068751755,0.00013238075,0.00004271774,0.0012368995,0.00015394039,0.0000053159406,0.000026638567,0.000010007081,0.99151695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787855,0.0001193415,0.00058767555,0.00013853003,0.00097472564,0.00030116318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980613,0.0006690662,0.0005256451,0.00030493,0.0003158504,0.00012323212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005031216,0.000228759,0.00035247864,0.000021566906,0.00034558086,0.00004482591,0.0005087957,0.00022512133,0.06818936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027917523,0.00018329138,0.00015284416,0.0000051408324,0.00043290516,2.842454e-7,0.000035153036,0.00028341293,0.00050950743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008165822,0.000016475262,9.4078565e-8,0.00013604057,0.000017459643,0.000016079894,0.0012152429,0.0000809513,2.9330408e-8,0.035792936,0.96144855,0.0011944534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009669671,0.00016637545,0.000003917417,0.00033303196,0.0000806611,0.000008599561,0.00068746734,0.0000014653139,0.000006754067,0.0004190915,0.9980125,0.00018344392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78226805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.885944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10367602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002855488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084395334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971740830","doi":"","title":"Terrorism Prosecutions in Canada: Elucidating the Elements of the Offences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Criminal code; Law; Mens rea; Meaning (existential); Product (mathematics); Criminology; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01094927600188977,"score_gpt":0.2623822108659582,"score_spread":0.2514329348640684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971740830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98653054,0.00053475006,0.000018554467,0.009177439,0.00033593943,0.00018426291,9.254604e-7,0.0000021526255,0.003215449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984315,0.00036702337,0.000005678439,0.00008513094,0.00008174018,0.0000030136248,1.2566196e-7,0.0000027898043,0.0010230112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981006,0.00019689513,0.00022546752,0.000078669975,0.00045180708,0.0009465606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995484,0.00009023092,0.00017747901,0.000111208465,0.000047394344,0.000025311509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023211315,0.000052098494,0.00008076334,0.000018124754,0.0004302953,0.000023880619,0.0005411609,0.000019865895,0.00005259725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001405747,0.000029033854,0.00004321276,0.00022943127,0.00008130926,0.00013185252,0.000036744033,0.00072284444,0.0000035382975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018232744,0.00003507148,0.5786934,0.000009440339,0.000045949728,0.0000010858523,0.008941511,0.00010395311,0.0005584279,0.3966081,0.00040475494,0.014580089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007569428,0.0002359871,0.21105841,0.00034993718,0.000073297684,0.00006664637,0.5364019,0.00021284398,0.00062283664,0.20822166,0.041604053,0.00039548354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8575968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5274604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014100386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013140558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972240141","doi":"10.21991/cf29388","title":"Ford et Irwin Toy 30 ans plus tard: une conversation avec le juge de Montigny","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022283115270421167,"score_gpt":0.28672480930960176,"score_spread":0.2644416940391806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972240141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060151063,0.01136634,0.2225988,0.32236105,0.017671479,0.0029596316,0.0012366683,0.0005233479,0.3611316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97526324,0.0009782743,0.0017367767,0.004371923,0.0004932165,0.00009671045,0.00024830073,0.000027941309,0.01678361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448,0.0004226041,0.0010151747,0.001066981,0.0011490068,0.0018662027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971339,0.0005205526,0.00045349618,0.0006037469,0.00061744574,0.0006708491],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014824511,0.00067695644,0.00076278945,0.0002592336,0.0022665395,0.00033883873,0.00077609124,0.00072625006,0.0031889777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000533875,0.0007833364,0.000560315,0.0009455759,0.012319825,0.0028539973,0.0002889833,0.00074907084,0.0038855157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014890915,0.00020185117,0.0108852675,0.00014247878,0.00014611971,0.0000787558,0.002692836,0.00710825,0.00025002615,0.9562519,0.020013751,0.0020798612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028747933,0.00020211017,0.0008630493,0.00089540856,0.00024596887,0.0003204552,0.021800023,0.006303065,0.00027494808,0.071769714,0.893268,0.001182449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012767517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006118597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017777652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011505012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976735168","doi":"","title":"The Provincial Statutes of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02089482005896802,"score_gpt":0.2734105629638496,"score_spread":0.25251574290488155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976735168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023031202,0.00079815864,0.000002012914,0.0020429282,0.00061028125,0.00013090165,0.000015427593,0.0000087211965,0.9963685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040536,0.0001272521,0.000015084923,0.000073858966,0.00066824834,0.0000028933478,0.0000021302624,0.0000050846184,0.99505186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898905,0.000036595837,0.00013031183,0.00007200085,0.00051597174,0.0002560632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920756,0.00039643166,0.00009930057,0.00011747534,0.00009764603,0.000081563034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045809025,0.00006728909,0.000106609805,0.0000067899614,0.00045968796,0.000024588422,0.00030590026,0.000076925964,0.00042794898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016045762,0.00004201868,0.000036889785,0.000019949814,0.0002896668,0.000053958684,0.000036689824,0.00010223318,0.000008231812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002477374,0.0000013548675,0.000012345915,0.0000102887225,0.0000042119727,5.415219e-7,0.00044333294,2.8048783e-8,2.0296697e-7,0.4164881,0.5803713,0.0026657921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008243698,0.000005553401,0.00003746977,0.000017149645,0.000013987921,9.120437e-8,0.0005586479,7.6065895e-8,0.0000058149903,0.0041988683,0.9950933,0.000060839688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9466383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41472194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028455004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013085186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977191326","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.42.4.511","title":"Due Process and Victims' Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Criminal justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Due process; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Theory of criminal justice; Process (computing); Sociology; Public law; Sources of law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04523311179069807,"score_gpt":0.3153036313941911,"score_spread":0.27007051960349304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977191326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581698,0.0025126236,0.000015885098,0.0126888845,0.00022707085,0.00006267434,0.000004712436,0.000003089344,0.02631525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742246,0.00018387947,0.0001349238,0.0012230275,0.00038554892,3.999757e-7,1.8075876e-7,0.000004674314,0.00064493413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990342,0.000111271656,0.00026385463,0.00009666949,0.00014353942,0.0003504097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883044,0.00017394288,0.00012015421,0.00008935492,0.00019154187,0.00059457903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030494467,0.00008438855,0.00020119152,0.00008204064,0.0006542266,0.00005479542,0.0002687937,0.00009961491,0.00039840044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016737008,0.0000627892,0.00003301252,0.000058090107,0.0015223372,0.00021046323,0.0000063571106,0.00020786271,0.0000033763688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050001505,0.000013471886,0.00023364119,0.00012785118,0.00003558588,0.0002718244,0.0782815,0.000016778957,0.000024321076,0.90535676,0.003811024,0.011777246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005444132,0.00053072884,0.0046261554,0.00016666364,0.0012301165,0.002106567,0.030449323,0.000013000198,0.00028216676,0.1257021,0.8340813,0.0002674878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15805717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19072205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83027023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004427471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013094376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8475494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977532631","doi":"10.29173/alr2573","title":"Building Haystacks: Information Retention and Data Exploitation by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Law; National security; Data retention; Constitutionality; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science; Politics; History","score_opus":0.06282083647697459,"score_gpt":0.35079777997837536,"score_spread":0.2879769435014008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977532631","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06859777,0.14117697,0.0007416279,0.44840112,0.0018780032,0.0075397165,0.00017375409,0.00013133623,0.3313597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634033,0.024194984,0.000116073585,0.0118824085,0.000039600076,0.000019286485,0.00014229199,0.0000050864196,0.00019698922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990513,0.00015585299,0.0002189941,0.00015837124,0.00023078041,0.00018470183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990311,0.0002463696,0.00010469404,0.00038848867,0.00012058989,0.00010870603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013789729,0.000072330564,0.00011261333,0.000012878846,0.0005029277,0.00020338823,0.0004742217,0.000045578938,0.00016794569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041013566,0.000056073965,0.00001793952,0.00023423762,0.00007243026,0.0022188518,0.00007591371,0.00009488414,0.0002543162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026901278,0.000004819948,0.00025887234,0.00146496,0.000009766947,1.9606071e-7,0.005704237,9.612561e-7,0.0000055057817,0.94531053,0.017625118,0.029612327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000159257,0.000006907061,0.000035389334,0.0008811474,0.000034692835,0.0000018031469,0.00058292516,0.00017070246,0.000004933997,0.0017961558,0.9963848,0.0000846053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9006231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.963744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074157986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011912063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3868164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978682605","doi":"10.4324/9781843927273-14","title":"Police interrogation in Canada: from the quest for confession to the search for the truth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Willan eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Confession (law); Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08027657883831996,"score_gpt":0.32449580037681547,"score_spread":0.2442192215384955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978682605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009858003,0.000450435,0.00040217867,0.07733189,0.0037665288,0.0071766754,0.00068181806,0.000045508685,0.900287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8510048,0.000025713329,0.000027323127,0.0019950802,0.0015116085,0.00024291831,0.000021195745,0.000026591273,0.14514478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988867,0.00007014606,0.00020005423,0.00022555131,0.0003397553,0.00027781833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963091,0.0031064104,0.000089683184,0.00029086813,0.0001336624,0.000070260554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006622627,0.00014057773,0.00015855004,0.000019242787,0.00066614215,0.00010871131,0.00067081884,0.00010627924,0.0000918795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007568651,0.000068354966,0.00007456265,0.000010997517,0.00016363773,0.000023643071,0.00007618212,0.0002004268,0.000022948829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000948889,0.000002073401,0.000054291693,0.000020658923,0.00003696331,5.622285e-7,0.053974878,0.0000086293385,0.000011096403,0.85080916,0.04840294,0.046583883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009137705,0.000028432856,0.00033393202,0.00021650545,0.00002974509,2.5068832e-7,0.015667176,0.000054277323,0.000017847662,0.0051909504,0.9782458,0.00012370043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98769206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044549326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015311613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5123494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980798085","doi":"","title":"An analysis of penal law objectives in child abuse cases: a comparison of the Kenyan and Canadian experiences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"SU+ Digital Repository (Strathmore University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Law; Criminology; Political science; Child abuse; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.011845505144846303,"score_gpt":0.27292585115019735,"score_spread":0.26108034600535107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980798085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8338751,0.000106108746,3.98522e-7,0.000013944102,0.0001379428,0.00015262328,0.00006520918,0.0000074448776,0.1656412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997849,0.00001954838,0.0000027144747,0.0000029020007,0.000030283562,0.000001116256,0.000028232846,0.000005723954,0.0020604804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987457,0.00012201485,0.0002499787,0.0003178007,0.0003413119,0.00022318626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990063,0.00012230664,0.00029032334,0.00022845065,0.00016275476,0.00018989861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000078430014,0.0001537694,0.00037360349,0.00046896734,0.0005101373,0.00013260898,0.0004692374,0.00017480509,0.000011170314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049908333,0.0001280397,0.00017103463,0.00079699524,0.0007750986,0.0007763665,0.000015246251,0.00013767325,2.2782926e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003473507,0.00034110856,0.52647996,0.00011925908,0.00044814553,0.00044488508,0.4302399,0.000037502294,0.00035825535,0.03956239,0.000016784492,0.0016044867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001345548,0.00015738427,0.12660635,0.00039315326,0.00045508266,0.000005435388,0.86868745,0.000013513531,0.0011334255,0.0000379756,0.002082377,0.0002932714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32501498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9019162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5769012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019712177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063995004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6794798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29822783","doi":"10.29173/alr314","title":"Advisory Review: The Reincarnation of the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reincarnation; Constitutionalism; Law; Political science; Constitution; Blessing; Democracy; Constitutional law; Cornerstone; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.058130698862709405,"score_gpt":0.3359071735402127,"score_spread":0.2777764746775033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29822783","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013740363,0.66126835,0.000005011997,0.111252904,0.0003319426,0.001204946,0.000001510702,0.000016178594,0.2245451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23293169,0.750712,0.000011668619,0.012724666,0.00007951608,0.000021942247,0.0000010018707,0.000006308548,0.0035112381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984193,0.0004624113,0.00034030734,0.00014396706,0.00045969026,0.0001743124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856865,0.00058919296,0.00023379695,0.00044423464,0.00011934065,0.000044783006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010995888,0.000088763714,0.0002534884,0.0000058481696,0.0007488323,0.000009990706,0.000559982,0.000033225893,0.00022913274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014678641,0.00004562537,0.00018641217,0.00036653067,0.00048616025,0.00018237095,0.000062142775,0.00012760762,0.00006526326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004054473,0.000029762707,0.0007741946,0.004403118,0.000023919807,0.0000025002075,0.0023311554,5.170315e-7,0.000016565627,0.83816344,0.14741868,0.0068321135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025786148,0.000007662097,0.00020777332,0.012037222,0.00010778583,0.000007614672,0.00003174379,6.723242e-7,0.00001406975,0.000226975,0.9872665,0.00006621142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017387567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011442287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8398478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046535864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093558694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983326089","doi":"","title":"A Review of Decisions Rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Criminal Matters: January 1 to November 30, 2017","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Criminal court; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0858502374018159,"score_gpt":0.33936372764448813,"score_spread":0.2535134902426722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983326089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042912125,0.97982156,0.000053593467,0.011343572,0.0001729711,0.00088468974,0.0004932242,0.000005868302,0.007181579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008767203,0.9958983,0.00020951654,0.00048244116,0.000041871976,0.0000019830961,0.000013642155,0.000009866867,0.0032547012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976241,0.00042278232,0.0005035294,0.00034275863,0.0007730678,0.00033373514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971065,0.0012240257,0.00068649906,0.0005373245,0.00025869728,0.00018698024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011175708,0.00021542147,0.0013173767,0.0001357893,0.00023203708,0.000007845449,0.0014921199,0.0001729878,0.00090057746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045151875,0.00017604683,0.00034655514,0.0005442477,0.00040178976,0.00015767389,0.00029508935,0.0002107295,0.00002586131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670577,0.000051959,0.000006171318,0.01247354,0.000049201368,0.000021192485,0.001140294,2.0093708e-7,0.0000013096776,0.00038838477,0.83381504,0.15203603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009229132,0.000032684526,0.000037775633,0.09631845,0.0003113479,0.0000032862715,0.0021474792,2.188978e-7,2.9966318e-7,0.000043613036,0.90084743,0.0001651033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41940764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.646693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22728537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003639565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003024148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98606914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984667296","doi":"","title":"An Ounce of Cure for a Pound of Preventive Detention: Security Certificates and the Charter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fluid ounce (US); Charter; Pound (networking); Preventive detention; Computer security; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.037955733711687714,"score_gpt":0.3112380326076232,"score_spread":0.2732822988959355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984667296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98932457,0.0011487354,0.00015329331,0.0042394167,0.00014285707,0.0005812495,0.00003537815,0.000020709678,0.0043538054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873495,0.000212188,0.00021124967,0.000083549545,0.00012260741,0.000034673998,0.0000029125144,0.0000048070824,0.00059303764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00017257666,0.00020841531,0.00017563047,0.00023696251,0.00016478417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918616,0.00021765068,0.00013547871,0.0001880621,0.00019226238,0.00008039932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007331728,0.0000734558,0.00018135145,0.000013392247,0.00044840924,0.000030493278,0.00022480878,0.000057467696,0.00008130292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014426558,0.00005375492,0.00009161997,0.00009391954,0.0011633371,0.00035517386,0.000022784396,0.00007527476,0.0000051185807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009828275,0.0004273163,0.014301352,0.0003243911,0.00010335652,0.0000048148427,0.054870803,0.000004412078,0.0050224313,0.9142489,0.00850399,0.001205431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005805972,0.0012174377,0.05413242,0.00066725136,0.00053072814,0.000034743927,0.030992366,0.00039899623,0.024643274,0.37052947,0.5100028,0.0010445388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003939476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004893378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5437194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014704811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006260846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5955335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985659700","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1382","title":"Methods and Severity: The Two Tracks of Section 12","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Sentence; Proportionality (law); Charter; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law; Life imprisonment; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Constitution; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11393883092333436,"score_gpt":0.43000025474578124,"score_spread":0.3160614238224469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985659700","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006117333,0.46630368,0.0050615245,0.3343795,0.0010240605,0.0022791128,0.000018186936,0.00018909096,0.18462753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8101434,0.16771922,0.0050699287,0.01589834,0.0007671693,0.000031197094,0.000002422663,0.000016320915,0.00035198758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986955,0.0006051742,0.00020055695,0.0001493842,0.00021851272,0.00013086808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940944,0.00022125289,0.00008059422,0.00012696291,0.00007335951,0.0000883833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019570333,0.00006953422,0.00023170935,0.000003957703,0.00024382194,0.000027447502,0.00018143153,0.000030411695,0.00026414444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003879995,0.000048305432,0.000077614284,0.00014912449,0.00028388365,0.0001623225,0.000042188054,0.00011682317,0.000009234387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031642598,0.000044830456,0.00069880794,0.0056676064,0.00006361973,0.000005689384,0.011886204,0.0000014716709,0.0010426913,0.5773934,0.032228492,0.3709355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004053789,0.000024427993,0.00011651468,0.0004960399,0.00010166519,0.0000023374178,0.00023353532,0.000012196628,0.00009842809,0.0012908571,0.99751955,0.00006388629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00248235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019517929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001368209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047552414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3752587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986280286","doi":"10.29173/mlj1137","title":"Unconstitutional or Just Unworkable? The Life and Death of a Prohibition on Floor-Crossing in Fletcher v The Government of Manitoba","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06354402324846914,"score_gpt":0.30575096659283046,"score_spread":0.24220694334436133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986280286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802519,0.00019828968,0.000028999631,0.0035174333,0.00030062906,0.000249198,0.0000049420278,0.0000040520563,0.015444544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991816,0.00007090361,0.00008384287,0.00032122165,0.00027553504,0.00000371108,2.1156443e-7,0.0000045423253,0.000058429858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836874,0.00020460492,0.00029050975,0.000109995155,0.0008262033,0.00019995152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930114,0.00024198035,0.00020671943,0.00011317722,0.00007817714,0.00005880076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014368284,0.00008605875,0.00014057473,0.000017227861,0.00079928094,0.00017548424,0.0002214178,0.000051671777,0.00012019765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015420227,0.000045968973,0.000051970816,0.00011593059,0.00057127094,0.00021046962,0.00004792034,0.0002631005,0.000007866108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010127085,0.00030514615,0.13594691,0.00012575969,0.00006768953,0.000041028292,0.007945997,0.0007972683,0.0008877659,0.8366929,0.0006584803,0.01551831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028600711,0.0008365213,0.35933414,0.0030962732,0.00023558941,0.00026268855,0.53371716,0.00033829873,0.0019747147,0.02457788,0.07215982,0.0006068442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013254223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16668089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8121151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017195531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024628473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988661056","doi":"10.11575/prism/34113","title":"Minimum or Reasonable Notice of Termination?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Computer science; Environmental science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04443185923288525,"score_gpt":0.2583339876115119,"score_spread":0.21390212837862663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988661056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5040502,0.00007464769,0.011007999,0.0011293025,0.00014529159,0.00018982794,5.643059e-7,0.000040040955,0.48336214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500069,0.000091331196,0.023398483,0.00002216721,0.000010230937,9.722049e-8,8.370123e-7,0.000003018076,0.026466953],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994264,0.000058531234,0.00006922658,0.00010391111,0.00021630805,0.00012561942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999524,0.00008627212,0.0001002651,0.00011350537,0.00010601452,0.00006994365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026605118,0.00004224678,0.000112823145,0.000050125913,0.00018103539,0.0000030988904,0.0002865036,0.00006370524,0.0011329979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010258023,0.00004662775,0.00004998118,0.00013441699,0.0003430303,0.00028223734,0.000056247976,0.000048010686,0.000025077514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013386087,0.00090865075,0.018481597,0.0003757263,0.00010586609,0.0002875015,0.33015773,1.7558476e-7,0.0015475951,0.22523455,0.024622666,0.39693934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020142635,0.0009198649,0.29865453,0.00044115237,0.0005801351,0.000008113746,0.04866019,0.0022091353,0.0034284578,0.012371814,0.6298175,0.00089487655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023265807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000852999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6051948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002623703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001303056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990007664","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919000945","title":"By the Court: Anonymous Judgments at the Supreme Court of Canada Peter McCormick and Marc D. Zanoni, Vancouver, UBC Press, 2019, pp. 269.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014904273218911423,"score_gpt":0.2586889435702533,"score_spread":0.24378467035134188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990007664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932423,0.001745945,0.000008291697,0.030467233,0.0020976132,0.00030989907,0.0001463429,0.0000032528192,0.032798413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991218,0.00005748858,0.000022067592,0.0014506773,0.00012920513,0.0000010045143,3.1299135e-7,0.000005806612,0.0071154786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997035,0.00013165956,0.0003348478,0.00019534239,0.0011186552,0.0011844944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722385,0.00041271572,0.00018010997,0.00024643424,0.00036415676,0.00157273],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019476342,0.00012065577,0.00019845055,0.0000375785,0.001014488,0.00015621226,0.0011501901,0.000050440107,0.00049987104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006537565,0.00007296275,0.00005820063,0.00022209651,0.0028986635,0.00039296856,0.0000784746,0.00025052932,0.000007256443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025001676,0.000016158967,0.021497132,0.000020005173,0.000017858794,0.000047550602,0.0013956313,0.000014934255,0.00090174784,0.0757458,0.8998958,0.0004223851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038839498,0.00022014258,0.06382228,0.0001355788,0.000070058486,0.00013452726,0.0048773265,0.00006377534,0.0014508693,0.0019529363,0.9265627,0.00032137553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95769364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07379286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010581174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009734703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990141245","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v4i1.91","title":"Children's Charter and Convention Rights in Canada: An Advocacy Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Convention; Political science; Human rights; Law; Constitution; Convention on the Rights of the Child; International human rights law; Ex post facto law; Public administration; Bill of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.016191828367445153,"score_gpt":0.262919791374827,"score_spread":0.24672796300738187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990141245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922581,0.0006251785,0.0000042456477,0.000785534,0.0005925842,0.0002931833,0.00007524516,0.000005983311,0.0053600036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.00007660042,0.00008279644,0.000068926034,0.00067696685,0.0000030083079,0.000007892159,0.000018321749,0.00040754248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997535,0.00021237036,0.000513859,0.0004075944,0.0002201416,0.0011110551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591047,0.000058200378,0.0004995086,0.000428705,0.0005107502,0.0025923573],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078397716,0.00027561572,0.00049376494,0.00039876593,0.0029048733,0.00041670803,0.0009685104,0.00013603059,0.00016715185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032478376,0.0002608006,0.00010225295,0.00016968862,0.001377739,0.0016183306,0.000022846196,0.00041170703,0.0000039360675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007860574,0.000047408037,0.8058166,0.000028982426,0.00020234969,0.0019443326,0.06911408,0.000016906699,0.000012244837,0.11181714,0.0004840643,0.01043727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007204285,0.00014909454,0.9513827,0.0005092852,0.000082080995,0.00081181194,0.0017517746,0.000010817317,0.000043941247,0.039280936,0.004831417,0.00042571488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14556608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048649563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990366225","doi":"10.3917/rsc.1101.0239","title":"Chronique canadienne - Une décennie de populisme pénal et de contre-réformes en matière punitive au Canada","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04488026796265475,"score_gpt":0.31242938902731593,"score_spread":0.26754912106466117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990366225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8294583,0.0007444209,0.0018730111,0.02362733,0.001364626,0.0004920689,0.00019462213,0.00007657155,0.14216907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812989,0.00046386704,0.0035163208,0.0038339794,0.0010165477,0.000052150746,0.000020113766,0.000047416044,0.00975071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926437,0.0010550497,0.00078366447,0.0009699843,0.0008622956,0.0036852777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524313,0.0010791509,0.00040596185,0.0005730222,0.0005250228,0.0021737225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007183766,0.00057544286,0.00079607044,0.0002589064,0.0016363383,0.00032336568,0.0022490954,0.00030863367,0.00083618506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017805351,0.00067519373,0.00023436465,0.001547879,0.002914969,0.0013911502,0.0002919222,0.0010911763,0.0000562759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016415167,0.00032694888,0.01947719,0.00052379724,0.00007358607,0.0013507023,0.20171815,0.0009655207,0.0013851156,0.75923294,0.011648262,0.0031336334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017945095,0.0011845882,0.42603427,0.003965143,0.001024078,0.0034617942,0.14439575,0.019664008,0.0066158995,0.080545954,0.30734494,0.0039690617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.678687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016392594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040976096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990663109","doi":"","title":"The Institutions of Innocence Review: A Comparative Sociological Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Adversarial system; Law; Criminal justice; Sociology; Consciousness; Perspective (graphical); Criminal law; Political science; Comparative law; Law and economics; Criminology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11057433575268176,"score_gpt":0.40841946823299735,"score_spread":0.2978451324803156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990663109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079118416,0.02868862,0.00024936057,0.044522908,0.00072389556,0.0008813984,0.000021356203,0.00010221993,0.8456918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323136,0.0037116036,0.00024155676,0.0013525924,0.00037489986,0.00002694398,7.581715e-7,0.0000023742923,0.001057898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865067,0.0003330684,0.00022345802,0.0002062494,0.0003162343,0.00027033457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854803,0.0003715133,0.00011907666,0.0002202399,0.00062348106,0.0001176597],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093842775,0.000089691,0.00020250719,0.000011191555,0.001742033,0.000046413734,0.0004624679,0.00006449805,0.0004095348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011813756,0.00005925491,0.00008595903,0.0003080545,0.0047131004,0.00023415896,0.000076072145,0.00021055747,0.00049705594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014503015,0.000027392625,0.00023444874,0.00001060348,0.000010330391,0.0000010461198,0.004023566,4.246554e-7,0.000050647694,0.97846067,0.017064622,0.00010174729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009885878,0.00016746705,0.0020656195,0.00038157965,0.000034799144,0.0000016370973,0.01545888,0.0000040651153,0.0001873684,0.03172346,0.94972897,0.00014729575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059264256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014550191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94673723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014419363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036365312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990731961","doi":"","title":"The Cooperative Relationship between the Police and the Crown Counsel in Canadian Criminal Procedure and its suggestive Ideas","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The korean Association of Police Science Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Criminology; Criminal investigation; Law; Psychology; Criminal procedure; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03879976697601925,"score_gpt":0.352436124190951,"score_spread":0.31363635721493177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990731961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38963807,0.019942317,0.000002428762,0.5766922,0.00009490651,0.0020141555,0.00005635922,0.000018264556,0.011541262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97307724,0.024541134,0.0000024265576,0.0011920418,0.000110351015,0.000037323087,3.9553922e-7,0.0000043154164,0.001034792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715114,0.0010883803,0.00033623778,0.00020818856,0.00070713303,0.00050895225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920146,0.0066593564,0.00041523896,0.00022110205,0.00051117863,0.00017855906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622789,0.00011496973,0.000222886,0.000049935243,0.0029747956,0.00017853222,0.00077086745,0.000052499876,0.000008173142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010150256,0.000043023505,0.000042397012,0.001030102,0.0031157446,0.00044291187,0.00006439247,0.00019333042,0.0000138258565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018225366,0.000009513519,0.06055473,0.00012615231,0.00001859876,1.8029164e-7,0.10830261,6.552716e-7,0.000017631992,0.82276165,0.0030682706,0.005121788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044761747,0.000047177156,0.9360958,0.0019198607,0.00027626735,0.00000656768,0.01635422,0.000019613724,0.000033025914,0.008482714,0.036072228,0.00024492262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42677537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7076735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87554103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048356398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013864514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991746385","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.002","title":"The disappointing remedy? Damages as a remedy for violations of human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Punitive damages; Tort; Law; Human rights; Common law; Proportionality (law); Disappointment; Discretion; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.018075868416494403,"score_gpt":0.29953905966886396,"score_spread":0.28146319125236957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991746385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56957227,0.00035343703,0.00026150187,0.0020092996,0.00033756206,0.0002778932,0.0000057693514,0.000014480491,0.42716777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950007,0.00006461071,0.00051038945,0.000007296226,0.000088079134,4.0532385e-8,6.1737893e-7,0.0000021814697,0.0043260464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993031,0.00009429297,0.00012446949,0.00007503767,0.00024724548,0.00015588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991133,0.00024605702,0.00022001387,0.000110427536,0.00023915619,0.000070997914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007453215,0.000045434583,0.00010897439,0.000009138029,0.0027216955,0.00003315045,0.00036641493,0.000039025545,0.0004598042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052440333,0.000038170332,0.000118339674,0.000021813508,0.00030417446,0.0004936595,0.000038318605,0.00006989056,0.0000042867387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008396568,0.00003753545,0.0015474411,0.000015823056,0.000042007345,0.0000025429952,0.017269393,0.0000058727555,0.0017958417,0.9761447,0.0021038642,0.00095105276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059896294,0.00028928355,0.0038733676,0.00019711505,0.00009997742,0.0000041676685,0.05112656,0.000034140263,0.00040959215,0.020277893,0.9229485,0.00014044458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14167021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52049273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95586675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012739308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054335225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991977886","doi":"","title":"Understanding the Ottawa Convention’s Obligations to Landmine Victims","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mine action; Convention; Law; Political science; Aeronautics; Criminology; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.08620748438187222,"score_gpt":0.2918734776836435,"score_spread":0.20566599330177132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991977886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23069255,0.00011634489,0.0141301565,0.11178383,0.00052421895,0.0006267483,0.00003878861,0.0003440042,0.64174336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697116,0.000020138988,0.00021731292,0.0002513935,0.00015680266,0.0000017293171,0.000012581915,0.000008681618,0.029619778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986966,0.00025385144,0.00014929878,0.00024060179,0.00031011543,0.00034949524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914247,0.00023918417,0.00008775867,0.00028145235,0.00009164058,0.00015749488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004441317,0.00012012496,0.00014200306,0.00026338318,0.0018660408,0.00022401428,0.00058882183,0.00008446075,0.00020426109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008184188,0.00011109385,0.00011590765,0.0012756226,0.00032400532,0.00053147617,0.00010855749,0.00020965368,0.00016536488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003098729,0.00007672242,0.036977977,0.0000043246278,0.000018638186,0.000030898624,0.0023387475,0.00022729723,0.000053854175,0.8580667,0.10187541,0.0002984824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024089398,0.000046067926,0.012006982,0.000031530384,0.00005685765,0.0000015821379,0.0196349,0.000029626439,0.000019722129,0.005041242,0.9627099,0.00018069342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071978243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043493524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050399604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010299914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992267669","doi":"","title":"Research on the Modification of Chinese Death Penalty Review Proceedings: Comments on Chinese Criminal Procedure Amendment on the Death Penalty Review Procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal procedure; Law; Process (computing); Realization (probability); Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.26062390785496464,"score_gpt":0.4670355043222729,"score_spread":0.20641159646730828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992267669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39696038,0.0050922157,8.484519e-7,0.2626674,0.0002626387,0.0046700803,0.00004827717,0.000044914068,0.33025327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97869545,0.0040882085,0.0000094256475,0.016022516,0.0003444826,0.0003360036,0.0000049213622,0.000015285394,0.00048368107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942371,0.00043169822,0.0004388995,0.00067055254,0.0031969799,0.0010247625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996605,0.00035651302,0.00030821242,0.00040755182,0.0015004895,0.0008222632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013125708,0.0002803647,0.0003805669,0.00017117379,0.0037073544,0.00024379596,0.0022531678,0.0000952139,0.00013678921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00745102,0.00015467414,0.00012588518,0.002743409,0.0014631798,0.0003848043,0.000101653706,0.00068688876,0.00011088589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103219245,0.00034093167,0.014920359,0.0028549945,0.000021025933,0.000011025305,0.0271726,0.0000027577723,0.00008629535,0.7408712,0.21092702,0.0026885688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014899385,0.0040959693,0.16439684,0.080780745,0.0005646413,0.000048967428,0.14624643,0.00029587964,0.00043916053,0.054897282,0.54303324,0.0037109246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021156715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014062317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018780783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004078469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992558985","doi":"10.3968/11128","title":"Diversion Mechanism of the Criminal Produces in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Mechanism (biology); China; Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal procedure; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02018850688681668,"score_gpt":0.2794011103095935,"score_spread":0.25921260342277685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992558985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8047146,0.000013809974,8.21835e-7,0.0035427914,0.0005202088,0.00018372721,0.0000033697174,0.0000050499407,0.19101557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988812,0.000005161685,0.000013280192,0.00017336308,0.00007437194,0.0000017754631,1.1977305e-7,0.0000020662994,0.0008486339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867207,0.000068436326,0.000095384305,0.00020978811,0.0005396982,0.00041459952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995673,0.00002034541,0.00005315553,0.00012237235,0.00007661559,0.00016022818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001156709,0.00005132597,0.00008393205,0.0000978419,0.0009267001,0.000048964484,0.0008279418,0.000046323497,0.0001840657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022846792,0.0000419928,0.00003857516,0.0010209284,0.0009693529,0.00032408984,0.00006696722,0.00009711445,0.00002958604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004632825,0.000012881947,0.054052893,0.000017053831,9.1036503e-7,0.0000031126183,0.05908035,0.0000010285262,0.0035277181,0.8786807,0.00048099682,0.0041377237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038190227,0.000106443455,0.71599406,0.00022913485,0.000034875804,0.0000022134288,0.16170834,0.00006016809,0.0075707985,0.022483604,0.090764485,0.0006639501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3145038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30994153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8561971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046659217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015914997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71275216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992746368","doi":"","title":"The Duty of Fairness in the Administrative Investigation Process in Canadian Jurisprudence","year":2012,"lang":"id","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Duty; Law; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.08092247987961074,"score_gpt":0.38612331294261637,"score_spread":0.3052008330630056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992746368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93567824,0.00056671904,0.0000020860941,0.022755837,0.0002256005,0.00044570345,0.00000382901,0.0000038905287,0.040318105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987377,0.00012749674,0.000007054959,0.0002883833,0.00009478555,0.00003858237,0.0000010244811,0.000003574899,0.00070137705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978451,0.00055242435,0.0003393959,0.00015576438,0.00047127763,0.0006360027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864763,0.00071686483,0.00013141788,0.00017605703,0.00010458938,0.00022344537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036479607,0.00011435282,0.0001370131,0.000054953118,0.00043212087,0.00009867999,0.00067398825,0.00010599354,0.000066331595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007551225,0.00006696777,0.000032745706,0.000883153,0.00089641096,0.0006039938,0.000019589466,0.00024018042,0.000029123383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020272979,0.00006710903,0.45297825,0.00006658842,0.0000040300156,0.0000047162484,0.33066452,0.0000044815733,0.000022876915,0.21479444,0.0006369234,0.0007358046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107679305,0.00008013969,0.6678119,0.00021978801,0.000018053917,0.0000025869988,0.31199962,0.0000504303,0.00093089056,0.0057089147,0.012862779,0.00020723762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.775683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21504281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018235193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019235575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34123084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993690901","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1367","title":"“All Arabs Are Liars”: Arab and Muslim Stereotypes in Canadian Human Rights Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Terrorism; Racialization; Conviction; Tribunal; Political science; Existentialism; Citizenship; Islam; Law; Islamophobia; Sociology; Criminology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03567727920030854,"score_gpt":0.3483544763090948,"score_spread":0.3126771971087862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993690901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967196,0.00009313373,7.351122e-8,0.0143070975,0.00011094142,0.000073222225,0.0000052776,0.000004030119,0.088686645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958629,0.00004307997,0.000008724119,0.0024389387,0.001113413,5.0035294e-7,4.3376897e-7,0.000005778953,0.0005262318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890274,0.00012920966,0.00025115264,0.00010655168,0.00023054605,0.00037980097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935526,0.000052171254,0.00016812238,0.000050301158,0.000078802375,0.00029535202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006052206,0.00009388104,0.00026059363,0.00012009999,0.0007904908,0.00015076384,0.00014856397,0.00012922935,0.000034503995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019378112,0.00008271603,0.00006080816,0.00008680937,0.00034709374,0.00036213853,0.00002037218,0.00022645669,0.000008236915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014060207,0.000016959764,0.0027092097,0.000020375153,0.000013728313,0.000037579666,0.037137482,2.741846e-7,0.000034052104,0.9595104,0.0003639797,0.0001419285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078231253,0.00015777894,0.048255026,0.00016458597,0.00004000042,0.00002293486,0.01058247,0.0000020269588,0.000019370735,0.06638613,0.87329507,0.0002922849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91696405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019029202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002015449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6079896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993890907","doi":"10.71781/23059","title":"La perception des juges à l'égard des hommes et des femmes trafiquants de drogue au Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.17608602461312328,"score_gpt":0.43689374106868123,"score_spread":0.26080771645555795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993890907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94446903,0.0018381578,0.000047898466,0.0008832825,0.00035139566,0.00057111017,0.00004721666,0.000007366874,0.051784538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427815,0.0018037318,0.0041757845,0.000063052685,0.00016688893,0.000050097424,0.00014857444,0.00004505367,0.050765283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966205,0.0010363404,0.00044977735,0.00066800567,0.00044208422,0.0007833216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815124,0.0007084845,0.00028651446,0.00026342375,0.00025202165,0.00033833485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021316423,0.000449281,0.0005525992,0.000095565796,0.0016354729,0.00090462156,0.0010951271,0.0005885521,0.003448575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067868206,0.0004448777,0.00024211292,0.00028615465,0.0016700067,0.0015210607,0.00011882352,0.00040820212,0.0017256462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012632753,0.00015616357,0.07286766,0.00026442477,0.000050683288,0.000016285252,0.38793683,0.000029663881,0.0012157498,0.00046703083,0.00018214183,0.536687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036308152,0.00032107698,0.48048028,0.0029095274,0.0004233468,0.00003100733,0.45995855,0.00006711856,0.0017499593,0.0014035542,0.051429812,0.0008626735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5868447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93821925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53582436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012822102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038136588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994542279","doi":"","title":"The \"Report on Prosecution\" in the Light of Canadian Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St. John's law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.039732358542612305,"score_gpt":0.35759035666456995,"score_spread":0.31785799812195764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994542279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018451845,0.014648341,0.0000014845679,0.25502977,0.00017537273,0.00059884664,0.000002409971,0.000007722902,0.7293515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89944774,0.07865404,0.00006723972,0.020087846,0.00030603536,0.00010851041,0.000004585066,0.000010057308,0.0013139336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809927,0.0007951166,0.0002829143,0.00014235482,0.00042633398,0.0002540253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986028,0.0006304037,0.0001748178,0.0003739308,0.0001350079,0.00008301015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006745668,0.000071656505,0.00015707838,0.000025613272,0.00057325955,0.00005919105,0.00041714922,0.000036143698,0.000054296826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003311867,0.000038196,0.00006370849,0.0004959094,0.00020869932,0.00016009614,0.000014310989,0.00015218955,0.000054875676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025251677,0.000014082829,0.000025516785,0.00012691571,0.0000029882242,0.00002003782,0.0007571409,1.7894908e-7,6.297783e-7,0.9686955,0.025327343,0.005027129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019620144,0.00003012386,0.00014850764,0.0008371084,0.00003069693,0.00001152348,0.00040175274,2.3921328e-7,0.00000339851,0.0014551387,0.9970088,0.000053101176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35689643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78035516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006871498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030425136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6473861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995259627","doi":"10.29173/mlj1141","title":"Bill 16: Manitoba’s Change to the Fatality Inquiries Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.12264929914032842,"score_gpt":0.34239694565009343,"score_spread":0.21974764650976503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995259627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87150455,0.00037068408,0.000106911255,0.061581783,0.00462529,0.0006960733,0.000012383564,0.000079875914,0.061022457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192035,0.00011308977,0.0000531927,0.0039021273,0.003645517,0.000014168833,0.0000013862599,0.0000145335625,0.00033561394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977723,0.0004065935,0.00026351673,0.00022152861,0.00077755726,0.0005585445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891865,0.00018054222,0.00012841703,0.00032032182,0.00017887284,0.00027317053],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002047718,0.00015557604,0.00019170673,0.0000477833,0.0021564653,0.00067617686,0.0008612366,0.000085647975,0.0006122378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000161627,0.00009312371,0.00013647327,0.0002229599,0.0004677404,0.0007834872,0.00016523781,0.00045918615,0.0018834447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034470996,0.00025581953,0.10355925,0.00008761104,0.00014732846,0.00018161244,0.0685732,0.000020364465,0.00023753996,0.49819463,0.10969788,0.21870005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118772194,0.00009909738,0.0129906945,0.00006475934,0.000025212816,0.00004708602,0.109495014,0.0000015723501,0.00007523497,0.005725602,0.87116635,0.00019058594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22163083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8000696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76146847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032091557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007539804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995332741","doi":"10.71781/1787","title":"La constitutionnalité du par. 515(6) du Code criminel et d’autres sujets touchant la libération provisoire au Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.010094602154413018,"score_gpt":0.21188935215780585,"score_spread":0.20179475000339284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995332741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7870397,0.0038869309,0.00033837222,0.0069982065,0.0036655853,0.00061767414,0.00026145315,0.00014073806,0.19705136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96875924,0.0012157237,0.00027483646,0.0003398064,0.0010277842,0.00004926449,0.0005248611,0.000034748646,0.027773757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531615,0.00096803857,0.0006541812,0.00091006514,0.0014036765,0.00074791873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683714,0.00065916195,0.000676092,0.0003850643,0.0008331526,0.00060936145],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008604664,0.00064722274,0.0005715306,0.00018881238,0.01455325,0.00021903338,0.00071742706,0.0007510477,0.0001622171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051291205,0.00073531334,0.00031956157,0.0004476606,0.002100937,0.0010443158,0.00018329406,0.00059181574,0.000056858527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010450098,0.00046079283,0.027284225,0.00058426056,0.00039595395,0.0050427523,0.17170694,0.0013705393,0.0018727122,0.77113456,0.014867119,0.0042351154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000792729,0.00013466261,0.042049486,0.0010579062,0.0006736655,0.0009344652,0.09595934,0.0010335287,0.0018862686,0.0004793546,0.85400146,0.0009971405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96866804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83913434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010624397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02920873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995976599","doi":"","title":"A comparative analysis of the \"connection\" and the standing threshold requirements under section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter and section 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Constitution; Law; Connection (principal bundle); Position (finance); Political science; Economics; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.17041157001336582,"score_gpt":0.3301689180096998,"score_spread":0.15975734799633395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995976599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.873551,0.021503344,0.00004594487,0.0040958365,0.0012220647,0.0029685656,0.000114237286,0.00000944772,0.096489556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822706,0.0015149593,0.0000040535683,0.00010959489,0.000022286084,0.000011113587,4.8738536e-7,0.000002461789,0.00010795868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795645,0.0007813959,0.0004983193,0.00016780233,0.00045340526,0.00014264176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983162,0.00014602412,0.0008008842,0.00044100446,0.00025819364,0.000037657224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019528934,0.000104403814,0.00043110744,0.00004811624,0.00073926366,0.000015661695,0.0003268262,0.000064020875,0.00006602231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001634132,0.000044327327,0.0002552256,0.0011763689,0.0023342336,0.00015617222,0.00009332787,0.00014748413,1.1175417e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077193,0.000065787375,0.044046104,0.000981529,0.00073675823,6.018536e-8,0.05337335,0.000040939474,0.0004627538,0.899649,0.00029830652,0.00026820193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004401063,0.0007057463,0.6149481,0.03242314,0.030258797,0.000027145834,0.13412632,0.0010175644,0.020570006,0.030932885,0.12915918,0.0014300346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10905632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3951753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8687161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008363404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002326089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8968766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996337360","doi":"10.71781/1810","title":"L'introduction d'un régime de responsabilité civile pour le préjudice écologique dans le corpus juridique québécois","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027062294480429655,"score_gpt":0.32009042145695893,"score_spread":0.29302812697652925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996337360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759983,0.00039967286,0.00043652285,0.022895865,0.0018340028,0.0012584325,0.00005133702,0.000012191974,0.097113684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.760368,0.00035710496,0.01724548,0.0001551187,0.0032975834,0.00023679962,0.00023863104,0.00006857272,0.21803272],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498665,0.0018413627,0.00069467636,0.0012294439,0.00044534417,0.00080253114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972431,0.000678017,0.00061351235,0.00064629194,0.0005017283,0.0003173281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004187488,0.00043103666,0.00060881884,0.000099002486,0.001807152,0.00043307972,0.0015841151,0.0008721388,0.005786791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002017661,0.00050988054,0.00022852798,0.0005790163,0.00089530443,0.0009269171,0.00018298977,0.00060303527,0.002181646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048211724,0.003341105,0.0035855076,0.00043442787,0.00044390094,0.00024220909,0.352887,0.00019958754,0.16722633,0.10567931,0.051838517,0.30930093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039126177,0.0005196809,0.00967272,0.000287839,0.0002474688,0.000048560094,0.07083206,0.00006989988,0.116112925,0.00422597,0.796825,0.00076661975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43094826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71551937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7449865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082815357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015122358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996441726","doi":"","title":"Healing Ourselves: Interrogating the underutilization of Sections 81 & 84 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Indigenous; Legislature; Representation (politics); Service (business); Legislative history; Political science; Business; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.05087026599923574,"score_gpt":0.3607802419133256,"score_spread":0.30990997591408986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996441726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563597,0.000039624963,0.005953557,0.00672854,0.0005291485,0.00017239248,0.000008359381,0.000024866724,0.030183805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990643,0.000016377064,0.00008771076,0.000109540466,0.00011076356,0.0000026158782,9.887461e-7,0.0000019468494,0.00060573727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994871,0.00010682755,0.00012024397,0.00006706583,0.00014642855,0.00007232827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939257,0.000267627,0.000087940745,0.000076789045,0.00015184822,0.00002320006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030596743,0.000031617707,0.000047013116,0.000017717242,0.0008428193,0.000018478599,0.000087284745,0.000024584571,0.00015745628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039299455,0.000019329687,0.000032652246,0.00020190357,0.0007057874,0.00010928835,0.000026101307,0.00005292141,0.0000015809725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039455717,0.00015106151,0.041751448,0.00005491952,0.000059644193,1.654854e-7,0.116470896,0.0005725885,0.0028902856,0.8272021,0.006890278,0.003917196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004887317,0.00038575186,0.110413566,0.0006394735,0.00025736078,0.000016965263,0.7813033,0.012003168,0.01722066,0.050212048,0.026724886,0.00033413243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043785996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0367433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022183904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102191094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98083365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996573978","doi":"10.7202/1066351ar","title":"Du principe de proportionnalité en droit pénal","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010456653925060917,"score_gpt":0.2610593010917604,"score_spread":0.2506026471666995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996573978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94248766,0.0013280442,0.002830259,0.013724212,0.0010907539,0.0003606947,0.000013524721,0.00008768563,0.038077176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8333879,0.00048385462,0.001003563,0.0010056946,0.0009424882,0.00001754802,0.000006151872,0.000026035756,0.16312677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973395,0.0003409931,0.00036336796,0.00043945367,0.00057593326,0.00094075326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987181,0.0002794907,0.00018214903,0.00031259988,0.00010590917,0.0004017684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018971589,0.00021889583,0.00029725392,0.00006222051,0.00044929414,0.00013904412,0.0005456971,0.0005544192,0.0021919196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039147833,0.00025950404,0.00023406974,0.00035654934,0.0010283093,0.00042560705,0.00006397693,0.00067562686,0.0014146729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005809993,0.00012170167,0.04545631,0.00024037964,0.00005529565,0.00013929933,0.026587436,0.00012090526,0.00047877207,0.9011484,0.0018230653,0.023770338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044803537,0.0002676735,0.043681502,0.0003886785,0.00021815732,0.00018502893,0.009937201,0.0009790283,0.0006371064,0.12897728,0.81356674,0.0007135645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057864026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012179891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002512015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000541392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997343504","doi":"10.71781/1615","title":"Responsabilité civile en cas de diffamation sur Internet : étude comparative entre les systèmes québécois et français","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013343040529097705,"score_gpt":0.22852587103234734,"score_spread":0.21518283050324963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997343504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398975,0.009749441,0.0002738446,0.0014364972,0.0012022634,0.0006137637,0.00009856445,0.00009961001,0.046628546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435123,0.00054220855,0.00017921983,0.00009193356,0.00020832565,0.00003407746,0.0002604045,0.000025480134,0.055146005],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958272,0.0012233215,0.0005551909,0.0007665686,0.0009874739,0.00064021774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969701,0.0012777512,0.00054458936,0.00035650356,0.0004771802,0.0003738288],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007697384,0.0005401691,0.00065893907,0.0002485399,0.004903668,0.0001260758,0.0007034684,0.00068637636,0.00024750704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027847078,0.0006168133,0.0004401465,0.00040250446,0.0006561911,0.00086670613,0.00016433616,0.0006299892,0.00025946068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011652015,0.00028177217,0.08679835,0.00042511124,0.00029682188,0.00038850986,0.8230642,0.0021484313,0.0035684416,0.07916602,0.00059138093,0.002105786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069556857,0.0002057604,0.4541752,0.0013234509,0.00055431406,0.0001791094,0.46694517,0.0022821566,0.0040669013,0.00021831055,0.06852542,0.0008286228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8912977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.864988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36737686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011902339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051724296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997523092","doi":"","title":"“Mr. Big” Confessions, R v Hart, and a Proposal for a New Right of Appeal based upon Fundamental Post-conviction Changes to the Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Appeal; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038975463143340584,"score_gpt":0.38101995867310423,"score_spread":0.3420444955297636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997523092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.683219,0.0019230485,0.00034066322,0.26857767,0.00562448,0.007966332,0.00021237176,0.00014858168,0.03198785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473403,0.000057079775,0.00038621871,0.0007795191,0.00055648974,0.000101800244,0.00023950181,0.000023985263,0.05051508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989762,0.000093765375,0.0001309742,0.0002536029,0.00031605698,0.0002294575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992436,0.00015902845,0.0001640286,0.00014579654,0.00017018449,0.000117324984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038389396,0.0001451177,0.00021325401,0.000056264696,0.00042941116,0.00008254054,0.00017480922,0.00016410735,0.00014501113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009024582,0.000105046034,0.000059213755,0.00011172976,0.00007366584,0.000065549764,0.000016460517,0.00011079148,0.000021032129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050208047,0.00028638486,0.00028198006,0.0022555722,0.00014965386,0.000006111676,0.44651195,0.000011395438,0.041461065,0.39262673,0.079275236,0.0321131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006358975,0.00074702105,0.00067584467,0.0009205082,0.00020589124,0.0000011634969,0.14752713,0.00006801516,0.008186314,0.00040883478,0.84025455,0.00036882833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03403255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30286664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7609793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054678527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074629585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9723999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998625737","doi":"","title":"La présomption absolue de préjudice au consommateur : la lumière sur certaines controverses","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028412074002838038,"score_gpt":0.31126330876618463,"score_spread":0.2828512347633466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998625737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54944664,0.0017144927,0.0008747521,0.09915196,0.0024398933,0.0003537434,0.000042679632,0.00019852613,0.3457773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359111,0.0015748625,0.00011868141,0.00040283508,0.0006307739,0.000014526619,9.577295e-7,0.0000150757505,0.1613312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975103,0.0008424857,0.00028771174,0.00033343365,0.00034465536,0.0006813769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960783,0.0031428616,0.00013595818,0.0001946103,0.00018041169,0.000267874],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317252,0.00019969484,0.00026273253,0.000040325267,0.0003776899,0.00013021998,0.0002347253,0.00030139592,0.0021463886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00114145,0.00015473383,0.00013963148,0.00017696968,0.0014474556,0.00079586246,0.00006950091,0.0001312428,0.0008717878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013335621,0.00025220335,0.03183564,0.00021690334,0.000073683106,0.000115895746,0.009092075,0.0000071472155,0.0033283145,0.7942891,0.09509155,0.06556412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065140397,0.00008159141,0.015848393,0.0005505176,0.000110826986,0.000046483998,0.005956474,0.000060449584,0.0003576002,0.005090226,0.9709271,0.0003189411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051457062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033532903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87583554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034519515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006577558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999488397","doi":"","title":"De zucht naar vrijheid","year":2019,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.04338430485135986,"score_gpt":0.2938159514711914,"score_spread":0.2504316466198315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999488397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04504743,0.011174095,0.0010113711,0.002393963,0.0024456158,0.0011502912,0.0022127011,0.0003284778,0.93423605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65190154,0.053304985,0.0018070491,0.0032144675,0.0076803747,0.00001721044,0.0051286262,0.0003311097,0.27661464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504304,0.00036076375,0.00072017236,0.0017032375,0.0008443457,0.0013284282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953555,0.001248296,0.00052767375,0.002185602,0.00007060857,0.00061235804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021355262,0.00081585214,0.00092303805,0.00012529598,0.0014771915,0.0007307369,0.004206879,0.0004924335,0.000627818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033082146,0.0007826103,0.0001854316,0.0001373183,0.00081708207,0.0008798141,0.0025520872,0.00104519,0.0009413704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015557604,0.00038304695,0.03896152,0.011311672,0.002190388,0.0006222284,0.14719623,0.001759015,0.0006465638,0.4424686,0.041669462,0.31123552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000272424,0.00013499994,0.0036835861,0.0042319223,0.00060973695,0.000043430846,0.003832049,0.027381025,0.0000026135554,0.005653948,0.95296746,0.0011867802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015099995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019229002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91129804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009130131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033065586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000048186","doi":"10.7202/1066337ar","title":"David a déjà vaincu Goliath ... L’efficacité de la protection contre les clauses abusives selon un paradigme de prévention : inspirations du droit belge","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021551056165149518,"score_gpt":0.2801893528066505,"score_spread":0.258638296641501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000048186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88532794,0.0031260604,0.0037365532,0.014933781,0.0016334313,0.0010133396,0.00008161585,0.00014037441,0.090006895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933829,0.0017892469,0.0006611613,0.00026430964,0.0009789243,0.000033764765,0.0000040786526,0.000033799264,0.00285186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648106,0.0013228406,0.000550478,0.00035193563,0.00054946163,0.00074420543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984001,0.00030191353,0.00048569473,0.00018968689,0.00025071437,0.00037190714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002135628,0.00027730776,0.00033459757,0.0000954635,0.006075738,0.00038572005,0.00035905073,0.0004056177,0.0008447627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028099222,0.0002887605,0.00029675674,0.00039794325,0.00057034375,0.0011729709,0.000052574032,0.00087176776,0.00018188833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001682303,0.00061920204,0.0063633,0.00017300478,0.00015188393,0.00013432665,0.005782077,0.0010937166,0.0021438838,0.9315464,0.00033331703,0.05149066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010825124,0.0005659512,0.015257324,0.0009975827,0.00032633866,0.0010614789,0.00379343,0.00080190576,0.0012609382,0.025709553,0.9486359,0.00050708844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011575223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028390191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94830257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008439024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012834217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004388379","doi":"","title":"5.2 British Columbia’s Police Act","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Business; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08124052963988004,"score_gpt":0.3495800070203647,"score_spread":0.26833947738048464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004388379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2653251,0.00003733134,0.000014798125,0.0019917225,0.00018182128,0.000048337602,6.1939676e-7,0.00008076866,0.7323195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85968655,0.000020582673,0.00019039698,0.00051250315,0.00022788634,0.0000021558233,4.2369615e-7,0.0000025692732,0.13935694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938434,0.000045569926,0.000058520833,0.00009051788,0.00023725476,0.00018378587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960405,0.000035658737,0.0000135888795,0.000066639936,0.00007691542,0.00020315693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038787868,0.000020296711,0.000050594663,0.000004589183,0.00013327919,0.0004003168,0.0001479098,0.00003466478,0.0028782268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015776383,0.000032593274,0.000021787015,0.00009628314,0.000109030436,0.00021282604,0.000023279226,0.0000356654,0.00024929486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014085854,0.00001769193,0.016636815,0.0000015685769,0.0000017448425,0.0000055441055,0.0048822686,2.2987722e-7,0.0000041464223,0.0034466092,0.9645856,0.0104163475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006215003,0.000017858567,0.0062945257,0.0000075308253,0.0000036863462,0.0000039481747,0.00901256,0.000001960671,0.0000024740204,0.0016041533,0.98292065,0.00006851328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96323586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047704223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018429845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005898092","doi":"10.4000/crdf.3790","title":"La motivation des actes administratifs au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Activation Laboratories; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Port (circuit theory); Philosophy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.13088218499887594,"score_gpt":0.35437466266818624,"score_spread":0.2234924776693103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005898092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410761,0.0025054545,0.00011120091,0.0051760734,0.0007132901,0.0002873517,0.000037514335,0.000049491184,0.15004355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92818296,0.0011098005,0.0014920187,0.00047881875,0.00026680494,0.000019400708,0.000018253611,0.00004100945,0.06839094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992857,0.004823902,0.0003836684,0.00048648467,0.00058222533,0.0008667503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98794436,0.010917824,0.00020114754,0.0003068781,0.00020759657,0.0004221678],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054544997,0.00033479315,0.00035553463,0.000058000136,0.0005285965,0.00024809636,0.00053141604,0.0013566251,0.0011122302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00575712,0.00037762453,0.00015334079,0.0006033337,0.0021761002,0.0006527547,0.00005718842,0.0017830987,0.00007879742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001919369,0.0004496572,0.17775351,0.0013705553,0.0003154942,0.00021696794,0.121675886,0.000105737425,0.006479056,0.40518722,0.012487039,0.27376693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006517581,0.00020853907,0.056493767,0.0009391647,0.00018696366,0.00006616895,0.05221173,0.00009393202,0.003428839,0.01565513,0.86925095,0.0008130249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7765371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73596793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85676396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013107155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008453429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006647981","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0066","title":"Criminal law as public ordering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Order (exchange); Law; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Verb; Noun; Philosophy of law; Leverage (statistics); Phrase; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05364129303452982,"score_gpt":0.2770848625728848,"score_spread":0.22344356953835495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006647981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046933822,0.0006088839,0.0006284929,0.019982915,0.00023198419,0.000061747596,0.0000026327098,0.000044280318,0.93150526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762744,0.00031519294,0.0008813273,0.0005262433,0.00024707665,1.1753248e-8,3.56726e-7,0.000003585626,0.0003987914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990977,0.00010185595,0.00009410971,0.0001113028,0.00036201152,0.00023301419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992401,0.00004150648,0.00009914807,0.00006287788,0.00017090714,0.00038547246],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027587413,0.000063623884,0.00012610159,0.000006613866,0.0013848286,0.000086893655,0.00044658585,0.000053278298,0.004676019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067124085,0.00007427748,0.0001011554,0.00003385039,0.00039945086,0.0012100117,0.00007792534,0.00013691983,0.000042889125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007623986,0.000028967634,0.00016527226,0.000015705975,0.000024169405,0.00011154672,0.031747535,0.0000055918667,0.00016927555,0.9621094,0.0025378345,0.0030084513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002158723,0.00012029731,0.000149684,0.00002321693,0.000043677293,0.000015378466,0.068920754,0.000012948872,0.000034702713,0.00057499955,0.9297894,0.000099017634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2594647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3923528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96153444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019793627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013987852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006657236","doi":"","title":"De PlayStation-moorden : Over bewijs van medeplegen","year":2019,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012530153990842294,"score_gpt":0.2449326698551782,"score_spread":0.2324025158643359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006657236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74413145,0.00050927536,0.00014835215,0.0010289156,0.0010097596,0.0007688048,0.00025529432,0.00015778744,0.25199035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8147524,0.0004345673,0.00006521934,0.00014851845,0.00029902975,3.5997937e-7,0.00006066664,0.000051711242,0.18418755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430513,0.0005219505,0.000881491,0.0013518516,0.0015714557,0.0013681414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958073,0.0006872642,0.0012220129,0.0008971073,0.00049258646,0.0008937318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006030822,0.00076324755,0.0010477761,0.00074328843,0.0010745631,0.0003422753,0.002605023,0.001121034,0.001004561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010419869,0.0009744986,0.00074680406,0.0012495329,0.0014389732,0.0056650187,0.0010500469,0.0012672655,0.0008740229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008413464,0.0019131894,0.56724584,0.0032697676,0.003444071,0.0043118168,0.21357808,0.0028416645,0.033973467,0.052664183,0.09459206,0.013752402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037898652,0.0010825528,0.017576687,0.0018488591,0.0011070764,0.00013953286,0.13111106,0.000847802,0.0017483605,0.00060616294,0.8378417,0.0023003786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023405948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012317568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7432496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017834925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009932753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006896565","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3370335","title":"A ‘Bad Rap’: R. v. Skeete and the Admissibility of Rap Lyric Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admissible evidence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030864749628063123,"score_gpt":0.3434884430731081,"score_spread":0.312623693445045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006896565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676202,0.01625921,0.0004928314,0.010202091,0.00021887483,0.00020388531,3.664254e-7,0.000018169756,0.0049843937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856127,0.011931776,0.000040907245,0.00010818987,0.00044843354,0.0000028259074,5.060149e-8,0.000005636073,0.0018494708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973373,0.00050564425,0.0002857947,0.000182535,0.00045344827,0.0012353034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987511,0.0004916135,0.00020655744,0.00019389209,0.00023253582,0.00012430918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009737421,0.00009771179,0.00019378366,0.000041581952,0.0008608161,0.00007783221,0.00046278414,0.00006105609,0.0001304469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017196059,0.000063054125,0.000110364745,0.00026876183,0.0013105226,0.00037468562,0.000044220305,0.0006970582,0.000014229986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001395637,0.000057988967,0.008353848,0.000022578577,0.00010418434,0.000002413777,0.019620622,5.917907e-7,0.0008180413,0.88474196,0.00033928832,0.08454284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011514968,0.00080283865,0.011416911,0.00023367505,0.0001603726,0.00014024328,0.020612273,0.000041182127,0.0004986432,0.95239013,0.0123014655,0.0002507876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018918931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020394301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084292054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003011124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027732067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007369708","doi":"","title":"Evidence Disclosure and Discovery in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Scrutiny; Political science; Common law; Law; Possession (linguistics); Norm (philosophy); Right to counsel; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02887404506583387,"score_gpt":0.3345006115399106,"score_spread":0.30562656647407677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007369708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96713364,0.0067490516,0.0005151999,0.013894923,0.00028715792,0.000108190594,0.0000011305596,0.000023212791,0.011287502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985217,0.012417841,0.00001778843,0.00014269896,0.00061772857,0.000002856381,2.1755724e-7,0.000006485993,0.0015773972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790406,0.00020092569,0.00018815862,0.00015468763,0.00027463541,0.0012775192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995376,0.00015504514,0.000068732115,0.00009822191,0.00005178934,0.00008864577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002381103,0.00008232225,0.00012347505,0.00005364179,0.0009219109,0.00020570763,0.00022596797,0.000060826693,0.000025392677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009062685,0.000071712864,0.000043686858,0.00020612178,0.00058058964,0.0012562124,0.0000394811,0.00085472944,0.000018564098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749585,0.00002577142,0.029350013,0.0000026444995,0.000010069752,0.000003635489,0.0033993921,8.379023e-7,0.00006417301,0.9618678,0.000098019606,0.0051401225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027331858,0.0005335761,0.014808784,0.00033649587,0.000046801975,0.0002119173,0.014647019,0.000014085133,0.000040040108,0.9350064,0.033827975,0.00025360473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007779311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4598254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45204607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005233246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010409658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010798493","doi":"10.3917/apd.611.0104","title":"Quelle garantie de justice pour les modes extrajudiciaires de règlement des conflits ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de philosophie du droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05014452592502678,"score_gpt":0.3075960574460871,"score_spread":0.2574515315210603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010798493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73260456,0.013337986,0.0041770167,0.04018417,0.00040742639,0.0004273161,0.000053375352,0.00010783504,0.20870033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764326,0.0066537363,0.005785191,0.0011777781,0.0021756191,0.000028838458,0.0000064936303,0.000052614174,0.0076870797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964209,0.00066578336,0.00045751792,0.0005944682,0.00045446158,0.0014068387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975022,0.0013259514,0.00019449953,0.0003840543,0.00006968726,0.0005236209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089899317,0.00037676963,0.00043264852,0.00013068141,0.0009852197,0.00013452361,0.00082430796,0.00018141276,0.0009651452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032589663,0.00043879452,0.000292783,0.00022852069,0.0019829168,0.00033401206,0.00018875732,0.0004364128,0.00050326035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018425223,0.00035047016,0.016463883,0.0007731142,0.00009935046,0.00013910724,0.021041961,0.0012104044,0.007032063,0.93474036,0.00068233,0.017282706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060953706,0.0002672234,0.012026914,0.0010342858,0.00050797185,0.00008791592,0.006438044,0.008919056,0.0014555751,0.94187003,0.026176678,0.00060676824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005584109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075276935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2438281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032969605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006153694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011425559","doi":"","title":"After the Revolution: Being Pragmatic and Functional in Canada's TrialCourts and Courts of Appeal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.020031224354271904,"score_gpt":0.23854932586225394,"score_spread":0.21851810150798204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011425559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96695334,0.003132987,0.000047626225,0.015829917,0.000507684,0.00015703941,0.0000053083872,0.0000056014555,0.0133605255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870336,0.00050917594,0.00005721091,0.00025552124,0.00034161663,0.0000030674,2.0095464e-7,0.0000037835018,0.00012604256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988758,0.00019248933,0.00024148358,0.00008836482,0.00039928666,0.0002026085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994538,0.00022067186,0.00010870157,0.000059339956,0.00005658711,0.000100910554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009843188,0.000063333464,0.00012862918,0.000024527382,0.0005389648,0.000065212465,0.00007282829,0.000031854168,0.00024880728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001145044,0.000046391597,0.000022777991,0.00007601056,0.00024570955,0.00019275484,0.000026486769,0.00018371228,9.828788e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013324536,0.0003434461,0.2869414,0.00041648233,0.00022926525,0.0012522592,0.10125692,0.00043204325,0.00022444637,0.45820576,0.060713068,0.08865247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035473404,0.00023749613,0.45425266,0.0012086026,0.00026981725,0.0018265729,0.02192992,0.0017567581,0.000025479505,0.046381872,0.4677785,0.0007849843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4904284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9544846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4640562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012069646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001850114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5129649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011836690","doi":"10.29173/alr2593","title":"Enjoy the Silence: Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Silence; Cornerstone; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043481721992379034,"score_gpt":0.30365045602737956,"score_spread":0.2601687340350005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011836690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004383285,0.09985099,0.0000014972724,0.6786029,0.00024348927,0.00069609645,0.000008673103,0.000010381792,0.21620269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90948904,0.037595913,0.0000062346667,0.047936033,0.0001828934,0.000024829405,0.0000022347897,0.0000084083085,0.004754446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998462,0.0003001209,0.00026603416,0.00017143313,0.0005440163,0.00025637398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998243,0.0010900712,0.000125027,0.0003150832,0.00009867512,0.00012816864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007152235,0.000097189586,0.00023690268,0.0000014748481,0.0006589987,0.000033570526,0.0007485796,0.000027846376,0.0017898816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000967357,0.00005092141,0.00009945019,0.0002265483,0.0004416732,0.00013177673,0.00011133075,0.00011766151,0.000076602424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007091791,0.000008326694,0.00027007252,0.0007692314,0.00002309879,0.0000034932716,0.0041251536,0.0000021670082,0.000029394285,0.49497595,0.49819365,0.0015923559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022059981,0.00001240045,0.000055582186,0.00051823765,0.00007228168,0.0000018849753,0.00041871017,0.0000033834565,0.0000533449,0.00013084649,0.998638,0.000073279276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9051057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006425946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004680899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012031401","doi":"10.3917/apd.611.0074","title":"Développer la médiation, pourquoi et comment","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de philosophie du droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.02690727995388507,"score_gpt":0.3011377154763096,"score_spread":0.2742304355224245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012031401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11865268,0.0014941928,0.00039844593,0.5474283,0.0007326115,0.00028946318,0.000027816064,0.0000591907,0.3309173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97208786,0.0023878291,0.0014838296,0.012240402,0.0012795664,0.000018853092,0.00001679962,0.000033365002,0.0104514705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752474,0.000705808,0.00032603412,0.00042045192,0.00040922195,0.00061377336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.0016728864,0.00014894367,0.00034524777,0.000039023045,0.00030275612],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007638195,0.00023943695,0.00028297352,0.00009646792,0.0003156003,0.00012128081,0.00054949184,0.00013162401,0.0011107998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018186629,0.00027491877,0.00019999816,0.00023668708,0.0007289202,0.00032585004,0.00019000047,0.00039171608,0.0016685221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004551867,0.00021245642,0.011427984,0.00008468751,0.000039078383,0.0000307294,0.0117860045,0.00010103519,0.00017496654,0.9639632,0.0059517473,0.006182584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026670628,0.00007970768,0.009584272,0.0001560579,0.000041650263,0.000019734953,0.000491708,0.00034100737,0.000024188403,0.5385228,0.45023477,0.00023743414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076613156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001058387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8534352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012629574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000381176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015169960","doi":"","title":"Combatting Stereotyping & Facilitating Justice: McLachlin's Vision for the Law of Evidence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Law; Discretion; Oath; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Political science; Witness; Criminal justice; Admissible evidence; History","score_opus":0.08744174748217966,"score_gpt":0.4024636352868819,"score_spread":0.31502188780470225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015169960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89557433,0.022228695,0.046036147,0.026145691,0.001925335,0.0014378473,0.000005257745,0.00007297349,0.006573699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962099,0.0017032836,0.00029143394,0.00013179556,0.00028276868,0.000004419353,2.5528368e-7,0.000008948106,0.0013671812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975287,0.00020516383,0.00032084732,0.00015894823,0.00044027038,0.0013461107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616176,0.0031407517,0.00025885314,0.00014779686,0.00023689718,0.00005393086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008238906,0.00009352627,0.00016296926,0.000030741263,0.0011793985,0.00010419715,0.0004848803,0.000055923236,0.00002776107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010942818,0.0000609513,0.00013663604,0.00013541659,0.00018152405,0.0005529035,0.0000439536,0.0007367073,0.000018138173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010440241,0.00001831555,0.0007320705,0.00010116833,0.00004285751,2.9507524e-7,0.007408367,0.0001774035,0.0015269401,0.9479208,0.000055283483,0.041912086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001372269,0.0021429565,0.0009442845,0.0025068033,0.00069705606,0.00008150543,0.61472785,0.005072645,0.00044976894,0.3112666,0.060030356,0.0007079338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012377432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048201787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6366542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037441222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010694674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9071099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30152349","doi":"10.29173/alr165","title":"Distinguishing Charter Rights in Criminal and Regulatory Investigations: What’s the Purpose of Analyzing Purpose?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Charter; Law; Political science; Self-incrimination; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Criminal investigation; Interrogation; Business; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03058051503000783,"score_gpt":0.3200954985026871,"score_spread":0.2895149834726793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30152349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100488,0.10802061,0.000004486635,0.04095654,0.00092245574,0.0015065786,0.000002134987,0.000030595493,0.038507767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876187,0.010276777,0.00019540609,0.0013644651,0.00012688152,0.000037830865,0.0000027230062,0.000006450972,0.00037076714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868655,0.00023955232,0.00038077377,0.00022272971,0.00024590816,0.00022448933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986275,0.00069182704,0.00017005151,0.00031737005,0.000085213345,0.00010806255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001568997,0.000111259906,0.0002754539,0.000025833106,0.0004403679,0.0001531576,0.00031927976,0.00006099431,0.00010480603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011162013,0.00007718505,0.000067626606,0.00024853012,0.00080721633,0.0007744399,0.000057115838,0.00024105122,0.000011880002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019022972,0.000018903196,0.002254802,0.0006666616,0.0000062552444,0.0000028490683,0.0051014246,1.1161049e-7,0.000105402745,0.9827408,0.00041471035,0.008686169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007546414,0.000016162923,0.0037481012,0.0067020454,0.0001621656,0.000009237585,0.00045402156,0.000009491561,0.00008159758,0.010266436,0.978284,0.00019127318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054691292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31091356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016923212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064587395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015707781","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Police Foundations: Canadian Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.08865983755033381,"score_gpt":0.37709803509270856,"score_spread":0.28843819754237476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015707781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000115442435,0.0006428734,0.000002325463,0.045813322,0.002038869,0.00024193003,0.00014906247,0.00017269702,0.9509274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009054184,0.0026608289,0.000825009,0.010992845,0.0051297746,0.00002833039,0.00028875584,0.00004776505,0.9709725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981989,0.000112825386,0.00027104706,0.00036060007,0.00041868447,0.0006379004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982299,0.00023750197,0.00016832718,0.0006442219,0.00010389935,0.00061610487],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003821736,0.00020912742,0.0002668225,0.00015183527,0.0031809804,0.0016497798,0.0015840791,0.00045750197,0.010147141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031857373,0.00020435758,0.00014110624,0.000105144674,0.0007738711,0.0015263901,0.000105681,0.0002711238,0.001484118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1555716e-7,0.0000024851886,0.0000327317,0.000016252776,0.000008279463,0.0000061341643,0.0010055824,5.7903478e-8,5.491778e-8,0.38453823,0.6132236,0.0011659429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026306261,0.000009539325,0.00003921093,0.00017506674,0.000033597258,0.0000013919266,0.0017857015,6.1303473e-7,0.0000020851364,0.008987752,0.98866,0.00027873338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99793184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99786025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37555048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020969774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049588555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015945068","doi":"","title":"Mr.Big: The Undercover Breach of the Right against Self-Incrimination","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Law; Suspect; Political science; Privilege (computing); Supreme court; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.01838319241934098,"score_gpt":0.27261278206842965,"score_spread":0.25422958964908865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015945068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7191837,0.0002034907,0.000015110493,0.008139548,0.001002768,0.00042832136,0.000006353569,0.00006303235,0.2709577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906552,0.00007079166,0.000058673348,0.0014347933,0.00030573385,0.000009914939,0.0000020758746,0.000011061785,0.0074517485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982086,0.00034542286,0.00022763152,0.00023083074,0.0006830269,0.00030453247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998805,0.00031959976,0.0001456605,0.000504563,0.0001379218,0.000087255656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010413893,0.00011902147,0.00015315074,0.000019313631,0.0006717708,0.00011775102,0.00076392305,0.00010885933,0.0004297814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001599618,0.00007051409,0.00014224435,0.00027556185,0.00031292753,0.00034516267,0.00011156053,0.00024820943,0.00044737576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021447426,0.000110543224,0.009400987,0.00006256374,0.000036134912,0.000002159238,0.0070130136,0.000053665957,0.0017511115,0.97127646,0.00816627,0.002105641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003451738,0.000047442583,0.020478588,0.00013221664,0.00008355328,0.0000025070303,0.0042219614,0.000060789425,0.0031929628,0.011599735,0.9595685,0.00026654132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007900288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014046742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95967674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015030669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021395345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023163165","doi":"10.61737/rslz5365","title":"Repenser la protection des renseignements personnels à la lumière des défis soulevés par l’IA","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.13727958921815997,"score_gpt":0.3520573723879974,"score_spread":0.21477778316983742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023163165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08131516,0.0017227012,0.0012472722,0.0040228465,0.0010051102,0.0013121042,0.0000298115,0.00033600573,0.909009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78783506,0.006337657,0.0027133352,0.00015027281,0.0014098265,0.0002026673,0.000022832271,0.00008405755,0.20124428],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940602,0.0014454203,0.0008416696,0.0011807805,0.0015419868,0.0009299302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974528,0.0004368659,0.0005503563,0.00042081752,0.00061494135,0.00052420853],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029408524,0.00063854904,0.00078744267,0.00010547447,0.002459592,0.0004916001,0.0005590778,0.0009713935,0.005067605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021396799,0.0005987696,0.0005417473,0.00077847746,0.0030389833,0.00069039257,0.0002341381,0.0009178863,0.00057477586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051841955,0.001126477,0.03248514,0.010732232,0.0014007274,0.002505145,0.20967783,0.000054850534,0.0031852364,0.06538936,0.05716017,0.61576444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027206115,0.00046254642,0.011673967,0.0026194951,0.0006284154,0.00039510534,0.029316688,0.0000688796,0.00046273746,0.01126896,0.94164133,0.0011898117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05306782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017151635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8844812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007987337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012034343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023244763","doi":"10.7202/1068780ar","title":"La conception jurisprudentielle de la notion de « confiance du public dans l’administration de la justice pénale »","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Administration of justice; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022480771004793534,"score_gpt":0.2989020281930855,"score_spread":0.27642125718829197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023244763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78455544,0.0008678847,0.13639571,0.019773487,0.0003078323,0.00017231834,0.000027031065,0.000104217164,0.057796065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98847294,0.0015169822,0.0015796543,0.0015459838,0.0009922539,0.000024138444,0.000018053943,0.000023787563,0.005826194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967008,0.001699198,0.00027778558,0.00034966593,0.0003549494,0.0006176051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802125,0.0011098351,0.00018395297,0.00013731825,0.00008185317,0.0004657866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021935625,0.0001884012,0.00020159017,0.000035852016,0.0007294588,0.0004859276,0.00037874523,0.0007209064,0.00022872644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012565384,0.00024988543,0.00013826451,0.0003761366,0.0023804686,0.00054349995,0.000032036267,0.0007391557,0.00008475534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001176181,0.00021111766,0.009368419,0.00044041508,0.000047885304,0.00034196136,0.10724372,0.00051465945,0.008664895,0.8432977,0.0076032565,0.022148322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009958385,0.00039599295,0.029227417,0.00032999564,0.0008987843,0.00040012872,0.09340966,0.015069624,0.0041494225,0.022802973,0.83146113,0.00085902156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016307276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008405278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8238579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014448488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008366438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023517729","doi":"10.7202/1068720ar","title":"Canadian Administrative Law: The Case for Judicial Humility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humility; Law; Skepticism; Supreme court; Political science; Dispute resolution; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.1736884450367656,"score_gpt":0.37155251308401666,"score_spread":0.19786406804725107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023517729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0952105,0.0002776686,0.00081429316,0.6359704,0.00031989953,0.0011740912,0.0002619261,0.00008426224,0.26588696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976169,0.0000066285215,0.00006846681,0.0010108304,0.00043446003,0.000025245456,0.0000067904994,0.0000038994763,0.00082678394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934524,0.000098764576,0.00012678506,0.00013405918,0.000096116506,0.00019903858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990607,0.00049036345,0.00003673702,0.00008632011,0.00008691573,0.00023894584],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031166806,0.000056494493,0.00006505902,0.000013402607,0.0023473226,0.000068988375,0.00014295196,0.00013165642,0.00025371762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009062362,0.00004705394,0.0000455812,0.00022202606,0.0002420674,0.00012759192,0.000011520854,0.00019750818,0.000043000164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001345324,0.000009991671,0.0006521391,0.0000010219766,0.000014076625,0.000069401234,0.024244184,0.00008173093,0.000001492355,0.9024723,0.06892525,0.0035149374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006817473,0.000038815044,0.00008570724,0.0000051646466,0.00003298368,0.0000070115084,0.03371246,0.00016758003,0.000022505697,0.003812368,0.96196973,0.00007750211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4887682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8546367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011473086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012446402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023688852","doi":"10.7202/1068779ar","title":"Enjeux politiques et juridiques autour du principe de la confiance du public dans l’administration de la justice pénale","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05246962726247177,"score_gpt":0.3420629490544156,"score_spread":0.2895933217919438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023688852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67280626,0.0011584493,0.022664843,0.18576835,0.00022168123,0.00020298209,0.000058400088,0.00024648837,0.11687253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804275,0.0037345947,0.0034212673,0.0066007986,0.0012569049,0.000029053732,0.000013644188,0.000033791468,0.0044824593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961413,0.0019057313,0.00034339816,0.0004228144,0.00037788806,0.0008088371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972458,0.0015131072,0.00020066753,0.0001860566,0.00016715747,0.00068721373],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024815365,0.00025463864,0.00028372646,0.000042515287,0.0006657891,0.00064234,0.00055859477,0.00062578573,0.00021344722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034707813,0.00031529748,0.00016213587,0.00031329118,0.0023873055,0.0006888689,0.000060458027,0.0008235719,0.00005084939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042725555,0.00010352989,0.00564722,0.00031774823,0.000031976782,0.00027061228,0.06476283,0.000043024193,0.00064668973,0.9211593,0.004937072,0.0020372337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038366142,0.00039910447,0.03555944,0.0003087331,0.00044140033,0.0003616974,0.03164891,0.002377106,0.0035989173,0.097754925,0.8264198,0.00074636005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052342517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022207825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82340443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012890487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024461728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30242879","doi":"10.1002/jcb.27679","title":"Jurisdictions américaines et jurisdictions françaises face à l'article 33 de la Convention de Montréal: un dialogue de sourds?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.01439759107054561,"score_gpt":0.3170262186212822,"score_spread":0.3026286275507366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30242879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8378319,0.0004916259,0.08812534,0.0253976,0.0014308939,0.00010481064,0.00003608623,0.00012231481,0.046459436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353915,0.0013288606,0.0014212182,0.0005500762,0.0018790851,0.000018702985,0.0000051579027,0.0000144343885,0.0012432927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998282,0.00041712096,0.0002903625,0.00011127709,0.00046468602,0.0004345184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987258,0.00048100515,0.00016484217,0.00007889708,0.00018587356,0.00036362393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024099536,0.000103119615,0.000109314606,0.00012233295,0.0010166668,0.00030578228,0.00029081083,0.000114711314,0.0005249693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008575588,0.00010615092,0.00017306405,0.00015523318,0.00020583454,0.000934427,0.00004146086,0.00038979072,0.00008544994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010739008,0.0010931273,0.48459047,0.000010680517,0.00024000181,0.00007286656,0.07426884,0.0020948988,0.0028726594,0.39588255,0.033218227,0.005548278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005650023,0.00004904156,0.39553732,0.00007669085,0.00011815566,0.00077946024,0.0062422734,0.0015883304,0.00044753053,0.029628905,0.5647311,0.00023618557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043807197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013216516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53151286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005850367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026546212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78194815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026709010","doi":"10.29173/wclawr12","title":"Unveiling Wrongful Convictions Between the U.S. and Italy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi Roma Tre","keywords":"Plea; Paragraph; Adversarial system; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.09630053066186586,"score_gpt":0.35066775521128807,"score_spread":0.2543672245494222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026709010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012775369,0.13808642,0.0006928813,0.7371685,0.00067385513,0.0022056964,0.00002796603,0.00040236465,0.10796693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94384986,0.03952916,0.00002606768,0.015248044,0.000837177,0.00004837402,0.00000617952,0.00001584522,0.0004392841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998124,0.0005516069,0.00036918608,0.00028423173,0.00037239635,0.0002985465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986772,0.0005374688,0.00015771072,0.0002981484,0.00013367189,0.00019577832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149293,0.00015985624,0.0002975556,0.000009454832,0.0018993076,0.00015363505,0.00043747533,0.00006350634,0.00070066896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035770188,0.000097015,0.00011743698,0.0004338926,0.000854651,0.00033246708,0.00009911682,0.00031599423,0.0005470722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020155408,0.000025051066,0.0018653965,0.0010624598,0.00014389427,0.0000048537036,0.009204902,0.000010585584,0.00004980562,0.919705,0.0364558,0.031452145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075240474,0.00003537267,0.000791128,0.00035452758,0.00026856703,0.0000045239503,0.00091948255,0.000020356536,0.00001276241,0.0005328793,0.9968518,0.00013332965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018862648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063267915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96039605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004633635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008336084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026761338","doi":"","title":"La transmission du SIDA en droit pénal suisse, avec des aspects de droit français et canadien","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Jusletter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01560113730280138,"score_gpt":0.2762462616195872,"score_spread":0.2606451243167858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026761338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85792536,0.0031081033,0.0009736927,0.057787567,0.0007892078,0.00015575917,0.000011721366,0.000051363026,0.07919724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793064,0.00033939257,0.0007940773,0.004917935,0.0024099313,0.000013544152,0.0000037957511,0.000033966688,0.012180951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721354,0.000586372,0.00026546084,0.00030385863,0.00045907378,0.0011716731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984443,0.0005433283,0.00007157134,0.00020219471,0.000057804013,0.0006808116],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015650191,0.00023795891,0.0002603813,0.00006316599,0.0004681827,0.00012597574,0.0003767358,0.00035114615,0.0031281803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014574129,0.00025273918,0.00017959741,0.0002724699,0.00062995474,0.0008503853,0.000045661272,0.0004981729,0.00065839046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080898106,0.0005052929,0.09615479,0.00044266952,0.0001054327,0.0008310509,0.5597912,0.000024325811,0.0023769361,0.13037372,0.10152603,0.107787654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022536193,0.000079402926,0.09103085,0.00029266492,0.00013820805,0.00016482595,0.0018109428,0.000054810138,0.0008504419,0.0068716523,0.8980578,0.00042304036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09924322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037888363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79653174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005720133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021410966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027067719","doi":"10.29173/wclawr6","title":"Edwin Borchard’s Innocence Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Scholarship; Denial; Law; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.13099619454145284,"score_gpt":0.38687729845660057,"score_spread":0.25588110391514773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027067719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017238159,0.099869676,0.00044900458,0.5974026,0.0009287828,0.0028568357,0.000013722967,0.00052943046,0.29622614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78674644,0.13106629,0.00014238525,0.07901114,0.0013490367,0.00014947765,0.000008352421,0.00002536642,0.0015014834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834675,0.0004797561,0.00027398398,0.00023957208,0.00039798787,0.00026196326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926156,0.00012120506,0.00012025018,0.00023684633,0.00015023166,0.000109919194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011831104,0.000116642324,0.00022677334,0.000008367811,0.00066249404,0.00007397503,0.00047345247,0.000043061744,0.00078846974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004343709,0.00008041514,0.0000956329,0.0005758021,0.00038602843,0.00030820016,0.00006589609,0.00020061599,0.000902451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021484924,0.000020688009,0.00007208626,0.001050534,0.000020688092,0.000006113659,0.0059059174,0.0000013901889,0.00007178854,0.874483,0.10017754,0.018168794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000464307,0.00003542426,0.000038696395,0.00058476784,0.000059800965,0.0000028546751,0.0003655789,0.000011922835,0.000026794325,0.00019817079,0.99851996,0.00010959012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037263085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006278731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89834243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005264556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015331325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027333067","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3486","title":"Re-Charting the Remedial Course for Section 11(b) Violations Post-Jordan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Section (typography); Charter; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07075285999779458,"score_gpt":0.34410968145068865,"score_spread":0.2733568214528941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027333067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06713597,0.0005121632,0.012566087,0.61890984,0.0049426733,0.0010804766,0.000033278055,0.00022296603,0.29459652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913006,0.000039869974,0.00074482826,0.002158789,0.005597332,0.000009081346,0.0000031951604,0.000012348591,0.000133977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986779,0.00018385587,0.00026658506,0.00014946355,0.00039189585,0.00033030528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998862,0.00032737255,0.0001906175,0.00008780408,0.0002835548,0.00024861444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011857535,0.00008948185,0.00011328038,0.000012852347,0.0032698023,0.0002955442,0.0002809116,0.00007172179,0.00023417729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000684725,0.00006913292,0.00013955146,0.0001293213,0.00017244101,0.0004249248,0.000027383663,0.0003047913,0.000022120148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017930643,0.00006526738,0.0020003188,0.000019312625,0.00004404865,0.00001980978,0.029112741,0.00025577995,0.0024570879,0.94157684,0.019435262,0.0048342515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011379013,0.00063528464,0.0019402121,0.00016225857,0.000356421,0.00007735309,0.07003793,0.002289491,0.00075446465,0.07363268,0.84840465,0.0005713596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01457477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48277578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058999114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013972713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028255754","doi":"10.29173/wclawr8","title":"Miscarriages of Justice in Canada: Causes, Responses, Remedies (Kathryn M. Campbell)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Economic Justice; Happening; Subtitle; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Performance art","score_opus":0.07744738437431024,"score_gpt":0.3296450780506297,"score_spread":0.25219769367631945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028255754","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051990096,0.45220447,0.000044231274,0.4257204,0.0019423497,0.0026040187,0.000071284165,0.00013654733,0.06528661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040644,0.08732026,0.000023327279,0.007908391,0.00022629686,0.00002494809,0.0000028346956,0.000009674559,0.00041987316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979124,0.00074707135,0.00043751,0.00019907305,0.00045758227,0.00024634547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987637,0.0005412541,0.00019296804,0.00023189026,0.00014667581,0.00012353832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012687105,0.00011629421,0.00034686612,0.000012106016,0.00028819405,0.000015999625,0.0003610444,0.000036151658,0.00036172764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011632327,0.000087570035,0.00005751409,0.00041712017,0.0002918482,0.00014599696,0.00005042513,0.00018065138,0.000031635293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041875005,0.00007334754,0.0029831727,0.013597457,0.00012449698,0.0001239077,0.017062686,0.0000746315,0.0008265682,0.7570288,0.19434278,0.0133433705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083026636,0.000026141244,0.00072619546,0.0011713273,0.00017803084,0.0000027593733,0.0022829552,0.000007674141,0.00010411089,0.00008267348,0.99522316,0.000111925256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9153973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8520743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024957475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011424674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3960664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W303022657","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics after Auschwitz: The Case against SNCF","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ecumenical studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Honor; Nazism; Refugee; Morality; Resistance (ecology); Spanish Civil War; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.288916643576832,"score_gpt":0.4427933279766645,"score_spread":0.1538766843998325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303022657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317925,0.008221798,0.000035285622,0.036224928,0.0012630365,0.00010922157,0.00000149903,0.000014729813,0.022337003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942622,0.0027437438,0.00037239477,0.0013728443,0.0006798179,0.000003822616,1.72695e-8,0.0000051613633,0.00055996125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838287,0.00038338636,0.00041108273,0.00009757859,0.0004610744,0.00026400236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979877,0.0010664628,0.00022586786,0.000115939154,0.00046812402,0.00013589086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032217414,0.00009826959,0.00023967725,0.000026748467,0.0007913414,0.000065642904,0.00030021512,0.00009111802,0.0001046288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028926637,0.00005403448,0.00018891157,0.00012626965,0.0008839399,0.00036246562,0.00011955905,0.00069549435,0.000025395218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016185374,0.0007162904,0.0118224695,0.00014462629,0.0016457863,0.045875493,0.5701445,0.00001222199,0.000118001306,0.24579151,0.09269858,0.029412013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005051738,0.000648661,0.005044255,0.00030182677,0.00042115423,0.0012155593,0.1520097,0.000003089888,0.00013315953,0.017311174,0.82204026,0.0003659779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009620766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00730031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7293417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008579761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015775848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60864383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033699722","doi":"","title":"De positie van het slachtoffer bij de voorwaardelijke invrijheidstelling en de voorwaardelijke beëindiging van de dwangverpleging in rechtsvergelijkend perspectief","year":2020,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Research portal (Tilburg University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.09042382122545853,"score_gpt":0.36270239221584394,"score_spread":0.27227857099038544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033699722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72143596,0.0017922542,0.0037594687,0.019368073,0.00034440443,0.0011414641,0.000103045626,0.00033445482,0.25172088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755903,0.00600931,0.0009765074,0.0007639987,0.0011790327,0.000004589359,0.000020156387,0.00009985541,0.015356283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881805,0.0035016928,0.00066710694,0.0014562894,0.002075961,0.0041184607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457115,0.0016013563,0.00025806567,0.00054042763,0.00067912025,0.002349906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077293417,0.00063190557,0.0008108819,0.0013584781,0.0020132717,0.0004317799,0.0021817808,0.0007850113,0.0033497282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001967173,0.000816731,0.00052835554,0.0039016237,0.0010522668,0.0014004424,0.00091573194,0.003247873,0.0003342052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003448806,0.0014335056,0.16712038,0.0019323132,0.0010463723,0.054792807,0.55247116,0.02280342,0.020833962,0.0691451,0.09058543,0.014386726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002168835,0.0013442346,0.0024967566,0.0020354048,0.0004469999,0.000172609,0.4705393,0.025754262,0.0034750707,0.0037927707,0.48553148,0.0022422643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026785849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055618905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39494607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004611739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057274587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035842853","doi":"10.7202/1067975ar","title":"ACTE FONDATEUR OU LOI ORDINAIRE ? LE STATUT DE LA CHARTE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS DE LA PERSONNE DANS L’ORDRE JURIDIQUE QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Bombardier (Canada); Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024783736133724813,"score_gpt":0.30210376539980666,"score_spread":0.27732002926608185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035842853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6650677,0.0016748095,0.0051609688,0.094333835,0.00061050436,0.00028298917,0.00029716163,0.0001891705,0.23238285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97215754,0.0042305286,0.0014212215,0.0034758742,0.0014811144,0.00006164992,0.000060443905,0.00009005194,0.017021587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613225,0.0011144283,0.00053257926,0.0007190178,0.0005630659,0.0009386276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729216,0.0010951086,0.00029861406,0.0002654456,0.0002603111,0.00078836235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017192027,0.0004183144,0.00044483496,0.000113293434,0.0005131609,0.0004984227,0.0011664227,0.00046576658,0.00048406757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001465307,0.000542928,0.00040358555,0.00044390745,0.0011906669,0.0010942254,0.00016882615,0.0009334452,0.0002189229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017791637,0.00034570793,0.0046281563,0.00033703737,0.00018409164,0.00086137606,0.10885691,0.00033829192,0.0026793752,0.8645017,0.0051887613,0.011900681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006663755,0.0001970066,0.011377604,0.0009654193,0.0001717508,0.00071732973,0.008449035,0.0025137719,0.00074430514,0.031063246,0.94241214,0.0007220481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2206553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12187297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016652643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006752684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036796238","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850410.003.0002","title":"Defining the Scope of the Hearsay Rule in Criminal Cases: A Comparative Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Legislation; Admissible evidence; Criminal procedure; Perspective (graphical); Criminal law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1081255818963649,"score_gpt":0.3727505329961835,"score_spread":0.2646249510998186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036796238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061000127,0.003230283,0.0000043822347,0.007763965,0.00013956559,0.00035762237,0.000017393204,0.000015275453,0.9878615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8808002,0.00029546797,0.000108163986,0.0007157782,0.00015397147,0.0000100535335,0.0000011952022,0.000014247786,0.11790094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986439,0.00014711524,0.00024772514,0.0002758249,0.00049454253,0.00019092359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986877,0.00071021717,0.00017021879,0.0002073598,0.00016681121,0.000057708778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004280182,0.00016970329,0.00033477688,0.00003471274,0.00038757088,0.00005282058,0.00053043047,0.000116082,0.0007187511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025223108,0.00009741033,0.00017274906,0.00008855752,0.0010258675,0.0000871229,0.00015935123,0.00045906336,0.00011399801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030293886,0.000009850387,0.00001930492,0.000013036576,0.00001519952,0.0000144974865,0.052089285,0.000004628784,0.0000018667123,0.9455868,0.0020579766,0.00015726633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037003166,0.0003961485,0.0012379168,0.0019572685,0.00044209836,0.0000316633,0.4638743,0.000020456033,0.00025078192,0.18622528,0.34435627,0.0008377516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028415548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04946964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020926887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005744403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97805434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038450938","doi":"10.71781/2288","title":"L'impact des recommandations des commissions d'enquête sur la législation québécoise","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.10481419918785237,"score_gpt":0.41807622452364046,"score_spread":0.31326202533578806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038450938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68362296,0.000501641,0.00007547947,0.00061375176,0.0005382218,0.0007673726,0.000105926214,0.00000436305,0.31377026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113825,0.0009484933,0.0031406642,0.000017003134,0.00013559205,0.000039856342,0.0007637191,0.000037582693,0.18353462],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997353,0.0006738253,0.00052848324,0.00052921806,0.0004156064,0.0004998776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997222,0.0011813681,0.0004280541,0.00040409854,0.00044524376,0.00031922405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011731768,0.00036688705,0.00046771823,0.00011683948,0.0019632631,0.0009781447,0.0010190964,0.00044092294,0.0174047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008313329,0.00035121886,0.000252468,0.00058171526,0.0006339936,0.0020646018,0.00012491147,0.00039900522,0.0027351922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000225251,0.00047707598,0.04415333,0.00014085989,0.00013573378,0.000013032066,0.13629991,0.00029598025,0.00061696407,0.0023917593,0.003936458,0.8113136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049840845,0.00027042243,0.1456474,0.0025451682,0.00050265965,0.000011181084,0.025284665,0.00050578476,0.00031354357,0.0022582526,0.8212985,0.0008640182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15204887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37445655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.817362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040658834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016176751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038687493","doi":"10.32850/2414-4207.2019.11-2.19","title":"CRIMINAL PROTECTION OF LAW SUPPORTING PERSONS UNDER LIGISLATION OF ENGLAND AND CANADA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.026127836886975227,"score_gpt":0.27721452076706826,"score_spread":0.25108668388009303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038687493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95004296,0.000036360405,0.00002809887,0.0036017948,0.00009108156,0.00016955863,0.0000039387032,0.000007502509,0.046018675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.00000420123,0.00009689112,0.00011847615,0.000042690026,0.000002618796,0.0000010695948,0.0000033376741,0.00071419956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993587,0.00005992502,0.00014173621,0.00010161435,0.00021487905,0.00012314449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965334,0.00007820724,0.00010989109,0.000061925224,0.00005961111,0.000037008827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003472273,0.000044278822,0.000098346674,0.000009191148,0.00012793115,0.000012736658,0.000051013718,0.000038863647,0.00029867658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041425883,0.000043406417,0.00001817113,0.0000290908,0.00013441309,0.00004113934,0.000014503076,0.00005422569,0.0000033734211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009698215,0.00003807106,0.0073118,0.0003520947,0.00001656868,0.000003142861,0.019760322,0.00005386592,0.006304587,0.96391773,0.00077488367,0.0013699728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051931274,0.0002139248,0.006217939,0.00020011821,0.00006840265,0.0000061521027,0.017699458,0.000050980718,0.0074214516,0.0018724288,0.96549135,0.00023846813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92691886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033397333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010693614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32702988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039321764","doi":"10.7202/1070088ar","title":"Repenser le secret ministériel","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.044936643948144415,"score_gpt":0.27912217373445036,"score_spread":0.23418552978630594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039321764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21027966,0.0053740684,0.00056438026,0.40664703,0.00096700527,0.0003110433,0.00004921794,0.00014277804,0.37566483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356922,0.0007576846,0.0010117987,0.004543337,0.002378334,0.000012009527,0.000009745357,0.000030934192,0.055563956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980127,0.00020354809,0.0003462041,0.00048566874,0.00027179075,0.00068004703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987288,0.00017718917,0.00014301276,0.00028560814,0.000078662066,0.0005866999],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048478774,0.00014729731,0.00033644403,0.000020483913,0.00037628948,0.00012531747,0.00049025286,0.00025285303,0.0014042327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045989628,0.00025252177,0.00022969343,0.0004604724,0.0004803706,0.0003752936,0.00010074076,0.00033382786,0.0017872676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090690744,0.00013207899,0.0023647035,0.00077219214,0.00005082916,0.0008492824,0.036280617,0.00006896305,0.0008765829,0.82896423,0.113270834,0.016279023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026061846,0.00020079999,0.0009863875,0.00041052408,0.00010511657,0.000079588346,0.005690465,0.0010555289,0.0005029119,0.0407555,0.9494626,0.0004899773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038619258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007729818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8361918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017496302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044956597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039854006","doi":"10.7202/1070096ar","title":"Euthanasie, abattage et mise à mort d’animaux : comment interpréter la Loi sur le bien-être et la sécurité de l’animal? Commentaire sur Road to Home Rescue Support c Ville de Montréal","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033291207201605326,"score_gpt":0.3049380673679497,"score_spread":0.2716468601663444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039854006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67303836,0.0013738079,0.00033550832,0.29904857,0.00024387857,0.0005953928,0.00032521095,0.00015021786,0.024889031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614169,0.0016785621,0.00078182126,0.029116865,0.0004420905,0.00008684773,0.000060553895,0.00010261071,0.0063137533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952313,0.0011912945,0.0007385364,0.0008543695,0.0005564835,0.0014280322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731374,0.0005348891,0.00020830185,0.0005174228,0.00013978432,0.0012858353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023459448,0.00045221392,0.0007770931,0.00010972208,0.00041938634,0.00036459777,0.0010506077,0.00041725472,0.00057640235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033270757,0.0006511139,0.0004484989,0.0005861682,0.0003698904,0.0007416513,0.00056634034,0.00088225544,0.00037229678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015492631,0.0028308984,0.10150793,0.0022376704,0.00048722827,0.009126787,0.18240175,0.0012782286,0.005199402,0.12086949,0.5516777,0.020833638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014385192,0.0010231888,0.027351871,0.0013752463,0.00029583712,0.00047227525,0.014975257,0.002676629,0.00090038346,0.0011367258,0.94709754,0.0012565433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0916521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05654916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3954198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007570027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000988165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040201991","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.604","title":"International and Comparative Legal Perspectives on Victim Participation in Criminal Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Legal process; Theory of criminal justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.22032928683974545,"score_gpt":0.45648960803239785,"score_spread":0.2361603211926524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040201991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19874632,0.0047517978,0.000044944507,0.0039680316,0.001199069,0.0005958133,0.00008383444,0.00003974227,0.79057044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.519665,0.47055507,0.00048560614,0.00017528805,0.0016235762,0.000117921634,0.00006635921,0.00002684294,0.007284349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941966,0.0014382568,0.00073132565,0.0011128652,0.0014767885,0.0010441459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948013,0.0032498557,0.0003050921,0.00028825708,0.00090451725,0.00045101435],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014772449,0.0004603129,0.00086085737,0.0007684106,0.0008478945,0.00016627474,0.00076413626,0.0006996048,0.00027409277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040937588,0.0004556931,0.00010190683,0.00028609467,0.0029406382,0.00055884465,0.00042292275,0.0024297198,0.000025377125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004041128,0.0009823745,0.00021566941,0.00691935,0.00018354534,0.00051856606,0.40843388,0.000016516704,0.000011445376,0.45018426,0.01814679,0.11034649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005793575,0.0012401015,0.0020912727,0.0007182944,0.0022423835,0.000022684673,0.4769112,0.00009307571,0.00001565051,0.0009652697,0.5146704,0.00045034016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002633452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012331277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7832861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030132572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009520394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040561312","doi":"10.7202/1070090ar","title":"Étude comparative des programmes canadiens de mesures de rechange ou comment favoriser le désengorgement des tribunaux","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec); Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11986454629354087,"score_gpt":0.35149742704073544,"score_spread":0.23163288074719457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040561312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8495303,0.0125525,0.0031697822,0.12368283,0.00039274016,0.001081145,0.00015786124,0.00016410294,0.00926874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844958,0.0033813482,0.0066525354,0.0025477295,0.00082418515,0.00015451857,0.000024436971,0.0000336621,0.0018857432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642164,0.0006884288,0.00044512295,0.0005275021,0.00032701902,0.0015903023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796206,0.00029975423,0.00019881103,0.00025069882,0.00020356839,0.0010850973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013828191,0.00028334785,0.0005496339,0.00005320276,0.0009828929,0.00022617263,0.00061006227,0.00021765815,0.00020828794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034802617,0.00040821766,0.00025213292,0.0006505739,0.0009995276,0.00037175935,0.00013795102,0.00039661376,0.0000921357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002754125,0.0008951626,0.06529406,0.0017053615,0.0004385963,0.00052549405,0.62950045,0.00081484957,0.00054424664,0.18265618,0.06267487,0.05467529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011310115,0.0012512649,0.03693802,0.0013941171,0.00069132535,0.00007321359,0.102207266,0.0036190036,0.0043584267,0.05517129,0.7917488,0.0014162343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09270679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20978263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72907394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021889685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070257933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040873337","doi":"10.2307/jj.17610838.13","title":"A Human Rights-Based Approach to Data Protection in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Data Protection Act 1998; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Human rights; Analytics; The Internet; Digital rights; Internet of Things; Data analysis; Computer security; Political science; World Wide Web; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.069253950882884,"score_gpt":0.24140351139025612,"score_spread":0.17214956050737212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040873337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019636036,0.00015161622,0.0017560802,0.00064014486,0.00012230143,0.0011249086,0.00037010788,0.00010676502,0.99553174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.616733,0.00006265199,0.0023209713,0.00018363011,0.00028147022,0.0000031424452,0.00030537712,0.00009768053,0.3800121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970397,0.00022753557,0.00032991503,0.000992787,0.0008778431,0.00053221465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782366,0.00010670622,0.0004422874,0.00095749914,0.00021597662,0.00045384624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003403071,0.00042962437,0.0006520759,0.0002463768,0.0009829544,0.000060170983,0.002988096,0.00046325315,0.00040937468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036385183,0.00056999474,0.00014846909,0.00006587807,0.0004436972,0.0002985597,0.00082189747,0.0007672332,0.0000073660767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004639753,0.00017211339,0.0003039807,0.0014935494,0.0004349937,0.0013173617,0.0102757085,0.0015658977,0.00018933631,0.6202764,0.35516682,0.008339861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005260857,0.000075919765,0.00023032437,0.00039463543,0.00026633826,0.000002619374,0.0011380618,0.00042342197,0.0000660041,0.0006547231,0.995627,0.000594854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98869514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6404602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014806676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016229745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041054523","doi":"","title":"Committing to Justice: The Case for Impact of Race and Culture Assessments in Sentencing African Canadian Offenders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Legal culture; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05734236290949063,"score_gpt":0.3685529271919873,"score_spread":0.31121056428249666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041054523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96692306,0.00016814815,0.00012451844,0.025649821,0.00010629303,0.000597091,0.000052486055,0.000017117782,0.006361477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762326,0.000012732233,0.00057625026,0.001528381,0.00012874023,0.000013971136,0.0000015737521,0.000007093117,0.00010797267],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.00012720254,0.00016681766,0.00018496602,0.00013463845,0.0003444911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989979,0.00024056902,0.00006279165,0.00010394768,0.00007886076,0.0005158989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006066515,0.0000911379,0.00015906632,0.000026390304,0.00058840367,0.000104568746,0.00019940177,0.000052579617,0.000030073119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076743943,0.0000695582,0.00005662139,0.0002875197,0.0001083355,0.0002017511,0.00003982292,0.00016646057,0.0000035757812],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005094839,0.00013904863,0.13651079,0.000935555,0.00027328864,0.0016087844,0.6055026,0.0026144218,0.0038620767,0.11999096,0.11072352,0.017329453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011681151,0.0007213224,0.011347098,0.00031464893,0.00028581492,0.00006663057,0.84338814,0.0024367191,0.00019674868,0.001398307,0.13798147,0.0006949607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8263558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9332325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23788553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002228121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035075372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45255846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041316142","doi":"10.17613/2pk1-2b62","title":"A Recipe For Wrongful Confessions: A Case Study Examining The Reid Technique And The Interrogation Of Indigenous Suspects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Michigan State University College of Law (Michigan State University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Confession (law); Innocence; Indigenous; Suspect; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Right to counsel; Criminal investigation; Law enforcement; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; History; Supreme court","score_opus":0.046781492985756186,"score_gpt":0.2658260750660992,"score_spread":0.219044582080343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041316142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98410445,0.000032114345,0.0011053005,0.0010906864,0.000051171748,0.0023829206,0.0016764657,0.00007351848,0.009483394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810326,0.0000448532,0.00014239106,0.0000581803,0.000014472756,0.0000013452204,0.000013956251,0.000017279135,0.0016042788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798125,0.000585397,0.00033279762,0.0004041682,0.00032366082,0.0003727206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972372,0.0013739209,0.0004455295,0.00033825284,0.00038861088,0.0002164911],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006637224,0.00024275968,0.0004844122,0.0002465269,0.0016591328,0.00006880977,0.000820067,0.00007880848,0.0000063679117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012829177,0.00020948595,0.00014793494,0.0010484436,0.0020949254,0.00085220847,0.00050776696,0.00029741973,0.0000010882288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005464974,0.0005092486,0.0016823002,0.00016036216,0.00046917304,0.0029003979,0.7169338,0.00006998611,0.00035714227,0.27069044,0.00012428187,0.00063794374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034889996,0.0010879118,0.00012910928,0.00014023083,0.00028680137,0.00006911532,0.95882756,0.00009808499,0.000461388,0.0009932413,0.034069028,0.00034850536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006175059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08556944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2696972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100437406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046482918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042812747","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - Public Interest Disclosure Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.183449894794901,"score_gpt":0.3361380578789892,"score_spread":0.1526881630840882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042812747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38373917,0.00012493145,0.00073121063,0.035172597,0.00023798231,0.00014357973,5.1480106e-7,0.00012567575,0.5797244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759709,0.00003842443,0.0010959068,0.00011504628,0.00011829292,5.9767547e-7,6.7659494e-7,0.0000034369396,0.022656677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947524,0.000041146348,0.00008015578,0.00012210285,0.00010613068,0.00017525037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.000052340954,0.000025884154,0.00010542434,0.0000329873,0.00021529407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001910924,0.000049935676,0.000059149545,0.000027943268,0.0002689216,0.00010750607,0.00014132747,0.000045946275,0.0020868897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015541479,0.000040433275,0.000022919754,0.000114187445,0.00012816777,0.0005613816,0.0000433657,0.00005065878,0.00006751547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003825569,0.000012501227,0.029811572,0.0000024686763,0.0000038454205,0.0000011348442,0.0065284544,7.831556e-9,0.000016728673,0.94813377,0.0075191595,0.007966561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010508323,0.000046940233,0.3665791,0.000024165536,0.000017977314,0.0000025404559,0.005284151,0.0000035864382,0.00010472506,0.019681938,0.60798764,0.00016217247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023685668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2737084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9284518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016892087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029457733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043009569","doi":"10.7202/1070287ar","title":"Who’s Afraid of the Lucky MOOSE? Canada’s Dangerous Self-Defence Innovation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self defense; Law; Honour; Property (philosophy); Accident (philosophy); Homicide; Political science; Sociology; Poison control; Philosophy; Human factors and ergonomics","score_opus":0.04184741893304051,"score_gpt":0.269954528803408,"score_spread":0.22810710987036747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043009569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20922703,0.00035183798,0.00019139826,0.15504897,0.0020648253,0.00040562192,0.000078918354,0.000090967085,0.63254046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970666,0.000044532815,0.00021082896,0.0022233105,0.0003039922,0.0000010386907,3.3313287e-7,0.0000064329693,0.00014291078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985033,0.00014826586,0.00029823414,0.00011525734,0.0006946596,0.00024024714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914783,0.0000714811,0.0002410713,0.000105928244,0.00030879438,0.00012487287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050445384,0.00007904112,0.00013304687,0.00001566902,0.0024979238,0.000047082594,0.00047375902,0.000046466026,0.00011497737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003449607,0.000058646085,0.00005045987,0.00048754382,0.00014744165,0.00024585,0.000060182938,0.00027470515,0.000004930515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037262856,0.000041570293,0.0028932202,0.00004494212,0.00003988276,0.000043459146,0.006373589,0.00012827663,0.0005819584,0.958842,0.024181206,0.006792667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095007184,0.000031532374,0.0012870533,0.000044217904,0.000019551733,0.000015858024,0.0015208775,0.000020866946,0.0009853825,0.0005871388,0.99530315,0.00008933607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45103085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88644725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97112197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001877343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028242747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043652341","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - School Districts and Subdistricts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.06862353800425482,"score_gpt":0.30035542486366684,"score_spread":0.23173188685941204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043652341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5089882,0.0006587845,0.0014419033,0.0045552338,0.00015199311,0.00023656157,0.0000015021741,0.00012477106,0.48384106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834243,0.00023707082,0.0019917185,0.00009181085,0.00008889047,7.487058e-7,9.2682546e-7,0.0000032864045,0.014161264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994081,0.00003172107,0.00008908743,0.00015240273,0.00014126522,0.00017738229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994015,0.000072821465,0.000029091649,0.00009033185,0.00003240478,0.00037384842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014879003,0.00005999113,0.000070383714,0.000028199363,0.00034987807,0.00008293481,0.00008085898,0.000051165287,0.00065455673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002666221,0.000053287346,0.000013579683,0.00015839296,0.00013057399,0.0003578368,0.00003858973,0.00004929604,0.000036142126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015512902,0.000019961713,0.089137785,0.000010313134,0.000006229567,0.0000059627305,0.0057296497,7.0061276e-8,0.000041653868,0.8788774,0.015116776,0.011038689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015030328,0.000037301343,0.8891577,0.000016929902,0.000026777874,0.00000392312,0.0020458265,0.000006410985,0.00011465865,0.0113947475,0.09689531,0.00015011796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059729278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02846703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86748266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020665575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002849067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046552460","doi":"10.29173/alr2603","title":"The Jury is Out: The Controversy About Jury Trials Under the Alberta Securities Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Supreme court; Charter; Jury trial; Political science; Section (typography); Enforcement; Prison; Business","score_opus":0.10636989358145811,"score_gpt":0.38661057344511784,"score_spread":0.28024067986365975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046552460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020596774,0.2016689,0.000004021941,0.61835456,0.00062778895,0.0012984662,0.000010301723,0.000022287964,0.1778077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3120384,0.42186514,0.000005066263,0.24114223,0.0016439611,0.0002136173,0.0000059766217,0.00003760165,0.023048032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560654,0.0020223414,0.0007642332,0.000371733,0.00066949776,0.00056562567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981406,0.01721261,0.0003896165,0.0006866193,0.00011836152,0.00018681813],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041316645,0.0002729359,0.0007288162,0.0000051113684,0.0024230885,0.0004983397,0.0015166166,0.00009908657,0.0013110143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051715234,0.00011781883,0.0006122827,0.0002567964,0.0011363084,0.00032556654,0.000171453,0.00035612125,0.00090397894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002401781,0.000009470532,0.000009548518,0.00019303168,0.000089522546,9.161651e-7,0.0077321897,2.0339066e-7,0.0000020911298,0.7505112,0.23370498,0.007722781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001362594,0.000032312026,0.000035955167,0.00077439414,0.0004358957,0.0000019070917,0.0018667469,0.0000031184316,0.000010327288,0.002284553,0.9942342,0.00018431738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049512617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17011349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005010466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025804926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046767836","doi":"10.7202/1070653ar","title":"Culture juridique des droits de la personne et justiciabilité des droits économiques, sociaux et culturels : tendances à la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.017434882614736545,"score_gpt":0.27954023040706966,"score_spread":0.26210534779233313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046767836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824356,0.012104308,0.0015002802,0.055918656,0.00039446095,0.0004119934,0.0002970939,0.00018867139,0.04674889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662949,0.0099403085,0.0036983253,0.006694105,0.0009858848,0.00004120223,0.000024037152,0.000068345085,0.01225293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949241,0.0020520668,0.00049252494,0.00076783844,0.000491242,0.0012721801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640214,0.0018675369,0.0002612719,0.00021846067,0.00027100736,0.000979594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022834179,0.0005444748,0.0006662347,0.00003815508,0.0012892704,0.0004807742,0.0008193756,0.0010035229,0.0002119551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030374667,0.0005797842,0.00031474116,0.0005316189,0.0045902296,0.0007964983,0.000103369275,0.0015938865,0.00002711408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006625703,0.00010525428,0.004212836,0.00070815143,0.00012613427,0.00044088825,0.20237246,0.00039202947,0.00047300901,0.7639745,0.023344949,0.003783543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053222466,0.0002507873,0.0054831197,0.0007378785,0.00048482628,0.0002362816,0.08043406,0.00040836885,0.0007981148,0.10179559,0.80769706,0.0011416711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5786261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7507538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004150285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058084023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3065343496","doi":"","title":"The Price of Prevention: Anti-Terrorism Pre-Crime Measures and International Human Rights Law,","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Scrutiny; Human rights; Law; Democracy; International human rights law; International law; Normative; Law enforcement; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04751888616490402,"score_gpt":0.33249226279529404,"score_spread":0.28497337663039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3065343496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69057894,0.001971905,0.00021714439,0.02075205,0.0009519866,0.0006452037,0.000017632014,0.00014785411,0.2847173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636716,0.000058938127,0.00012389883,0.00032847753,0.0005095229,0.000009381991,0.0000022341353,0.0000060233797,0.0025943937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869657,0.00017161928,0.0002426371,0.00022358465,0.0004671744,0.00019843441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993244,0.000108602704,0.000119713695,0.00014578676,0.00012958811,0.00017190892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054962694,0.000093550334,0.00013584107,0.000010886589,0.0010661879,0.00017371913,0.00044804873,0.00006250076,0.00024280307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011128269,0.00007190169,0.00006854917,0.00009393095,0.0005003843,0.0003958899,0.00009465984,0.00015044377,0.000032211017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003052308,0.000035287645,0.00096681615,0.000019498766,0.00003770353,0.000003842475,0.0031685894,0.000002558377,0.00093419425,0.99169016,0.002638733,0.00047212193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025809146,0.00010071014,0.008146654,0.00007643017,0.00003601574,0.0000019089903,0.00067794084,0.000011281258,0.0012976254,0.030759847,0.9584777,0.00015579328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006818285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012357851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028613276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042737585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080249192","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Nunavut Law Program Research Guide: Sentencing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.44149698063445914,"score_gpt":0.5906893278705666,"score_spread":0.14919234723610747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080249192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021561443,0.0028329664,0.000006476125,0.032155454,0.0020560075,0.002190129,0.000030778567,0.0004961956,0.96001637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015678557,0.007950537,0.0031250448,0.0004318573,0.009593665,0.0006092443,0.000078294936,0.0001330717,0.9623997],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832042,0.0032531049,0.00094882044,0.0015243889,0.0077051073,0.0033643905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874211,0.0034925493,0.00027051996,0.0022987663,0.0057197367,0.00079733535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042753574,0.0004478694,0.0007607039,0.0006767958,0.01231009,0.003932748,0.0055852653,0.00129858,0.0024115432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012236185,0.00039772733,0.00035230705,0.00092705357,0.008191145,0.0009693472,0.0017028535,0.0037769566,0.0026543508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014933215,0.00009194156,0.000048630613,0.00022626387,0.000031231026,0.00015591139,0.0024171136,2.813895e-7,0.000007635847,0.14080796,0.8210998,0.03509829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010348146,0.00022301743,0.000023805353,0.0014397143,0.000024640025,0.000005816192,0.027986737,0.0000071515665,0.000065883105,0.01385479,0.95581204,0.0004529329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5947093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47847593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13471222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001312316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047370084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085040321","doi":"10.11575/prism/34351","title":"Book Review – \"Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy by David R. Boyd\"","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0353143775393057,"score_gpt":0.33989532997178934,"score_spread":0.3045809524324836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085040321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035753113,0.15162076,2.7984186e-7,0.03284943,0.000101079364,0.00054414064,0.000047989633,0.0000017276468,0.81125927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892739,0.029432934,0.00066262175,0.0942589,0.00015056237,0.000018536142,0.00003171363,0.000020829459,0.08615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989498,0.00015668757,0.00012967174,0.00023532283,0.00019363475,0.00033486277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994488,0.0000406579,0.00004379883,0.00014376252,0.0000071781988,0.0003158258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006424648,0.000092110444,0.00014098766,0.000017979917,0.0007832086,0.0002367538,0.0003061644,0.00006995897,0.006651259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006922745,0.000089694804,0.000026950875,0.00008062468,0.00033492563,0.00055329344,0.000052790136,0.00012819968,0.00024933444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012303569,0.000053980915,0.00032301538,0.000104483224,0.00003156721,0.00009374811,0.023046501,1.8408137e-7,0.00044551666,0.25301296,0.6885287,0.034347013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059720292,0.000013716794,0.000015983947,0.0002056539,0.000017158356,0.000007116377,0.00039564387,1.8722561e-7,0.00015931504,0.00042924596,0.9985712,0.00012503506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44603923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44253993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7856986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018846957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023162787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085718539","doi":"","title":"The Competition Bureau and the Public Prosecution Service of Canada launch revised immunity and leniency programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Service (business); Business; Public service; Political science; Public administration; Marketing","score_opus":0.022861639225160515,"score_gpt":0.2684932843717512,"score_spread":0.24563164514659067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085718539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39186692,0.0018740472,0.0000832697,0.51761085,0.00046695778,0.0014722734,0.000024117599,0.000082067934,0.0865195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977994,0.0004782021,0.00018021067,0.00043446055,0.00013029682,0.000060439048,0.000012421252,0.000005162322,0.00089940603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985864,0.0004525079,0.00021582753,0.00015261491,0.00033041276,0.00026222016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987275,0.0003873524,0.00012102119,0.00022570763,0.00045391094,0.00008449424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015535976,0.00008987299,0.00012746519,0.000019494024,0.0028862115,0.00018736557,0.00025626452,0.000042444804,0.00034699327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039395757,0.00005790094,0.000026784317,0.00028002533,0.0017429112,0.000079776386,0.00008131562,0.00014010472,0.000014958367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050775812,0.00004775393,0.00039607487,0.000053229487,0.000013202107,7.132445e-7,0.00440669,1.1282658e-7,0.000051939227,0.9881362,0.005278223,0.0015651105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034589725,0.00004680536,0.0036156795,0.00011067396,0.00002120173,0.000008183735,0.0081844935,0.00001980711,0.000020079664,0.004566912,0.9829661,0.000094158975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3930469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7856459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98356926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059761944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002903064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088419429","doi":"","title":"Tribunal de Québec impõe condenação histórica a fabricantes de cigarros, Proc. nº 500-06-000076-980:","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito do Consumidor","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039891438599252003,"score_gpt":0.3425671799231405,"score_spread":0.3026757413238885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088419429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89213604,0.061862912,0.0020871453,0.01949771,0.0009909007,0.0024300735,0.0005211054,0.00071625045,0.019757846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662189,0.0016807435,0.00030386585,0.0015396782,0.0016518716,0.00013242505,0.000020581116,0.00009730334,0.02835464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929785,0.0009630727,0.0011815099,0.0012798089,0.0010638749,0.0025332097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474204,0.0014476269,0.00072399515,0.00090589654,0.000764128,0.0014163444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030271527,0.00079147436,0.0011944887,0.000198312,0.0018254068,0.0012673936,0.0016385543,0.00055855047,0.0025886323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035897526,0.00079599145,0.0005950927,0.0010892726,0.0028214946,0.00045511583,0.00033132386,0.00076936866,0.0015373529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013720029,0.001541683,0.27141535,0.002732191,0.0009364885,0.0012067595,0.08144767,0.0000041794833,0.019714983,0.062234897,0.49631312,0.061080668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082973525,0.00042070964,0.007000221,0.0013227212,0.0007829922,0.00020141675,0.005616341,0.00043714247,0.0009553176,0.00044007506,0.9807743,0.0012190224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047216993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010754753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4844612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027368132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070767347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092308306","doi":"10.7202/1071749ar","title":"L’évolution récente du concept d’indépendance judiciaire et les menaces internes à la détermination de la peine juste","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035899695317970604,"score_gpt":0.3385506678202538,"score_spread":0.3026509725022832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092308306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14731632,0.0146232005,0.0027205423,0.31012082,0.0051228725,0.00039128034,0.00017840153,0.00018764251,0.5193389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99074197,0.004488767,0.0004321352,0.001503386,0.0016592067,0.0000041292474,0.0000041462913,0.000024445044,0.0011418103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641925,0.0017573051,0.00045215338,0.00029842346,0.00057430624,0.0004985703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0005575399,0.0003993762,0.000090170666,0.00021779086,0.0003794253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018279871,0.00024034291,0.0002997753,0.000036785532,0.0027947365,0.00031076765,0.00044288227,0.00026961882,0.000439232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005486003,0.00023976271,0.00019563417,0.00024769362,0.00148569,0.0012111733,0.00010858377,0.0008858146,0.000068130794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010997915,0.00013897681,0.0015065066,0.0001037791,0.00006341567,0.00041901317,0.010591861,0.00033227447,0.00032084802,0.9167979,0.008399947,0.061215505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048682158,0.00021735266,0.0018970908,0.0006512637,0.00012896738,0.00044644237,0.004631995,0.0011368126,0.00066138944,0.0017480336,0.98771334,0.00028050886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00862022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010679783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030584662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007351514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093449273","doi":"","title":"Safeguarding Confidential News Sources? Assessing the Protections in the Federal Journalistic Sources Protection Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Legislation; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Confidentiality; Privilege (computing); Common law; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.02768329318802379,"score_gpt":0.3273801872224771,"score_spread":0.2996968940344533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093449273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652895,0.00082505675,0.0070713256,0.020626247,0.0006377292,0.0008283494,3.2110412e-7,0.00003409667,0.0046874145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650794,0.0004854577,0.0000124905255,0.00018085595,0.0014022401,0.000028415116,3.518313e-7,0.000015111147,0.0013671594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546254,0.0013306587,0.00038446859,0.00021308495,0.0008164247,0.0017928336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903613,0.00025525523,0.00035867555,0.00017539559,0.000107865555,0.00006664506],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008505712,0.00016058872,0.00018450113,0.00012613201,0.003650606,0.0017967346,0.00069338374,0.00010548158,0.00011546382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045908228,0.00009769948,0.00018961553,0.0004724152,0.00016003317,0.00086894596,0.000035050634,0.0032739816,0.00005061173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000514221,0.0005099296,0.12936966,0.00010054613,0.0005728575,0.00005740218,0.13278498,0.004866411,0.0077503123,0.57541806,0.0007585917,0.14729701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013660435,0.00064581307,0.017646968,0.00042169433,0.00019140646,0.0030870251,0.6530264,0.0005788339,0.000120286924,0.2387041,0.083480366,0.0007310677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013003661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045895185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52024144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009575479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022711563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093539572","doi":"","title":"Race and Criminal Justice in Canada: An Overview","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.09651861466301768,"score_gpt":0.3641162075356282,"score_spread":0.2675975928726105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093539572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927672,0.0007136036,0.00006752827,0.0054876823,0.00020084914,0.00006662623,5.926001e-7,0.000015774633,0.065775305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974589,0.000371821,0.00022910748,0.0010705149,0.0000885484,0.0000014303301,2.476876e-7,0.000001949011,0.0007775086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937093,0.00010718521,0.00007429014,0.000113342285,0.00016763365,0.00016660556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996404,0.00014055891,0.00001478999,0.0000688526,0.000022054179,0.000113367496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046336936,0.000039528997,0.0000756582,0.000011668469,0.00014015002,0.000029682678,0.00009778895,0.000018254334,0.00019363587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018222263,0.000035863304,0.00000571657,0.00006570894,0.000051386232,0.00017868594,0.000017755512,0.000045609617,0.0000058859146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001688223,0.000026123054,0.014977429,0.00017427943,0.0000016981635,0.000016027463,0.013366938,0.0000126343975,0.000037758546,0.9021025,0.0061869305,0.06308082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026786164,0.00008910926,0.18779597,0.000101581725,0.00012680242,0.000005717684,0.09190655,0.001199899,0.0000517922,0.0031071468,0.7149578,0.00038978053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99447423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89899534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117239884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045503257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2120177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W309360223","doi":"","title":"The Languages of Constitutional Dialogue: Bargaining in the Shadow of the People","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yesterday; Shadow (psychology); Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Wish; Point (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Anthropology; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.014352398418619199,"score_gpt":0.31484476972959524,"score_spread":0.30049237131097606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W309360223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9022462,0.011915298,0.0015103613,0.014758119,0.00036870423,0.00027077968,0.0000034260054,0.000008509292,0.068918616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981357,0.0014528414,0.000008091915,0.000069890746,0.00017016115,9.864224e-7,2.0085555e-7,0.0000017490554,0.00016039622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831104,0.00023283735,0.00021280957,0.00005458368,0.0004276407,0.00076108804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989443,0.00072199514,0.0001473524,0.000099040226,0.00006760619,0.000019716852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086258985,0.000046827812,0.00007879588,0.00002349715,0.00064950116,0.000025620559,0.00057128235,0.00003371952,0.000011201336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006543685,0.000022327094,0.000078074525,0.00028939196,0.00072601985,0.00007856131,0.000025807161,0.00064515613,0.0000014873278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017292945,0.000014286158,0.01589039,0.0000011025071,0.000009210492,7.501961e-7,0.006050286,0.000010996566,0.00009538074,0.9741998,0.000051727566,0.0036588043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040274308,0.00014484141,0.08160836,0.00009285344,0.000047323792,0.00015216,0.35938907,0.00000897678,0.00026388135,0.54682815,0.010927602,0.00013399689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030782432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18785481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4273716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016861821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018542055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82696474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093705965","doi":"10.4324/9781315243450-18","title":"Sentencing Reform in Canada: Who Cares About Corrections?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04622954098586549,"score_gpt":0.33315997077627235,"score_spread":0.28693042979040684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093705965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51704735,0.000054503907,0.000007716718,0.0047312514,0.0008517951,0.000052475007,7.9248736e-7,0.000012464752,0.47724164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915932,0.00007175061,0.000017937338,0.00016464811,0.00009739444,0.0000032258176,1.8202489e-7,0.0000018810993,0.008049819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942565,0.000019494813,0.00008320241,0.00009562654,0.00018453169,0.00019147036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996624,0.000029112438,0.000039757328,0.00015728654,0.000046546436,0.000064915905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021611514,0.000037565995,0.00006973364,0.000015228623,0.0009885104,0.00010356026,0.00022356765,0.000020955995,0.0001368319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020818524,0.000032248823,0.00001495413,0.000034621353,0.00007876594,0.00027145693,0.00003369957,0.00006398432,0.00000980145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129599875,0.000011709145,0.86626136,0.000015299978,0.000004992334,0.000060766008,0.010383034,0.000012509956,0.00002695624,0.06093808,0.01637221,0.045900147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109636916,0.000012040155,0.6815894,0.00013413676,0.0000061297683,0.0000014835389,0.16602822,0.00016060595,0.00028527246,0.00039766732,0.15107802,0.00019735527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99992543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4745458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013394089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011643133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76029223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094550903","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198837718.003.0006","title":"Meta regulation in data protection law: the risk-based approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Statute; Data Protection Act 1998; Accountability; Risk management; Scope (computer science); Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Function (biology); Law and economics; Actuarial science; Computer security; Law; Computer science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.3590182269235872,"score_gpt":0.3352411077949509,"score_spread":0.02377711912863628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094550903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011390182,0.00026678052,0.0075456076,0.010861721,0.00008870636,0.00088300975,0.000029255352,0.000073069685,0.9802507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17180805,0.00028637252,0.0037530875,0.0013918994,0.0013440149,0.00014172823,0.00037737662,0.00006483941,0.8208326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860525,0.00016208,0.00020793827,0.0004228529,0.00047492428,0.00012696188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990421,0.00012375768,0.00017548462,0.0005679014,0.000044074422,0.000046676894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014093023,0.00014046319,0.00021765432,0.000032491545,0.0003846684,0.00010600323,0.0006392843,0.00019556074,0.00054747023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119087315,0.00009133015,0.000092185895,0.000058061476,0.0002533303,0.00023251824,0.00010707629,0.00037269373,0.00007574028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002019964,0.000007857891,0.0000015806396,0.000023949635,0.00006476096,9.446518e-7,0.00057247677,0.00010007507,0.0000012708522,0.9949947,0.0024404887,0.0017716754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055769207,0.0000147522505,0.000014927832,0.000022719165,0.000584653,2.5101198e-7,0.00022646518,0.0036718773,0.0000043926893,0.04861404,0.9466289,0.0001612316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023715774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051775753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9463807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066753695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013952432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9827854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094600681","doi":"10.29173/wclawr19","title":"Innocence and Prevention","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Blame; Criminal justice; Criminology; Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10419797418617617,"score_gpt":0.37346698486029783,"score_spread":0.2692690106741217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094600681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067410716,0.20891725,0.0015037437,0.6149211,0.0005297628,0.0019674476,0.000003970432,0.0003244623,0.16509122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86728144,0.11338402,0.00008316533,0.018295484,0.00029300043,0.000028353488,0.0000020040934,0.000006587716,0.0006259183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991442,0.00025864143,0.00015560466,0.00013937088,0.00018298072,0.000119197684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960625,0.000065792,0.00007251741,0.00010269477,0.00006743293,0.000085295986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007058253,0.00006027242,0.000120940356,0.0000035728094,0.0004391474,0.000046360197,0.00015093916,0.000024796554,0.00043006125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019163573,0.000043193828,0.000036281705,0.0002140224,0.0002573389,0.00024079037,0.00003603744,0.000090682865,0.00019055106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000809602,0.0000069470216,0.0000824098,0.00061875535,0.000008484912,0.0000011750374,0.0017685303,5.476279e-7,0.000033162178,0.94293743,0.008482115,0.04605237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705357,0.000029652021,0.00011522368,0.00050510716,0.000050293547,0.0000022401814,0.00019460746,0.000008954688,0.000011914658,0.0012764822,0.99770904,0.000059425824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065766106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034681978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98922694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017169821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038421207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47088692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095256180","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v6i3.412","title":"The authority to order search in a comparative perspective: a call for judicial oversight","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control; Uniwersytet Wrocławski; McGill University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.14768825182116055,"score_gpt":0.43816610989112104,"score_spread":0.2904778580699605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095256180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7669272,0.014053987,0.014432933,0.15894525,0.0009898073,0.01174377,0.0006902779,0.00031978608,0.03189703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947874,0.00008093873,0.00025187535,0.0013762786,0.0015046251,0.00014109019,0.0000070645415,0.00003033272,0.0018203771],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546546,0.00068475876,0.00060631067,0.0009844311,0.0010465058,0.0012125449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964155,0.0012939139,0.00018856146,0.0002245934,0.001087126,0.0007903353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956711,0.0004083005,0.00072326756,0.00008331221,0.0016700039,0.0009238545,0.0011763575,0.00021908121,0.00012522405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029741977,0.0003496313,0.00022873288,0.0018104219,0.00046113794,0.00044609277,0.00028590273,0.00073872134,0.0001499073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006242458,0.00063660694,0.02494031,0.0015900054,0.00021782397,0.00012349943,0.50530356,0.00034523712,0.00050378946,0.38819548,0.070308335,0.0015929157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003838123,0.0042564124,0.07138863,0.0021548872,0.0006739274,0.000021166234,0.3421467,0.017227883,0.00055780396,0.0017177686,0.55280364,0.0032130461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004047965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063132206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48249534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074908306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027091736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095658211","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Law Journal: Criminal Law Edition (Robson Crim)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Scholarship; Punitive damages; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1065546482413894,"score_gpt":0.33803584010640597,"score_spread":0.2314811918650166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095658211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019745344,0.00020984984,0.0017088472,0.080079995,0.0013343437,0.00015770759,0.0000034780946,0.00022839603,0.89653206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392415,0.0000939114,0.0007267942,0.01170848,0.003201737,0.000002640984,0.000001932901,0.000009371667,0.00033100718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868137,0.00012744345,0.00019210114,0.00017854686,0.00050573854,0.0003147909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992797,0.000088679444,0.00006324293,0.00007975821,0.00014201137,0.0003466536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004067034,0.00009400151,0.0001225071,0.000014020543,0.0012210336,0.00033624782,0.00029054133,0.00007322962,0.0017523052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012006464,0.00008439779,0.00009138711,0.00011166668,0.00031424558,0.0007102941,0.000039282793,0.00021771788,0.0005451286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023302298,0.000022309048,0.0000265877,0.000017827131,0.0000050323615,0.000040932016,0.0054273256,0.0000026997313,0.00020031746,0.9315963,0.060589734,0.002047645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000128405,0.00013236316,0.00009531555,0.000029840065,0.00005693679,0.000014915584,0.044081494,0.000017777336,0.0008741539,0.012353733,0.9420423,0.00017276476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035127442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08281944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076493954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056203717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096837467","doi":"","title":"Roderick Muchikekwanape: Convicted killer escapes Canadian prison, may be hiding out in Washington state","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Q13 FOX","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; State (computer science); Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06260651595254114,"score_gpt":0.31261379766587905,"score_spread":0.2500072817133379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096837467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82139516,0.00041465837,0.000052615473,0.13392706,0.0006839903,0.00041520683,0.000019619012,0.00015144533,0.04294023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944371,0.00008830819,0.00014602313,0.003321152,0.0001354792,0.000008950728,0.000007684631,0.00001592098,0.0018393731],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838626,0.00014659822,0.00023815515,0.00031730696,0.00032367845,0.0005880027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921,0.00011064196,0.00006395368,0.00012210045,0.000061004022,0.00043228208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037793626,0.00013192317,0.00019723328,0.00007393289,0.00036683984,0.00015728213,0.00034349118,0.00008595894,0.00062764686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047478089,0.00013689169,0.00005228997,0.00028426418,0.000118314434,0.0003290706,0.00004503736,0.00021014847,0.00017546838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011479029,0.00008905037,0.11354708,0.00015876448,0.00006739253,0.00042839197,0.6570942,0.00028134833,0.0016008028,0.015943458,0.1582816,0.052393172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018064887,0.000044624583,0.0073225037,0.000045323803,0.000011559817,4.677796e-7,0.009269301,0.00023564139,0.00019283482,0.00026187467,0.98217833,0.00025686895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4685134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8777084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82389677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023784698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004828392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6872293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097606201","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679329","title":"Policing Arbitrariness: Fleming v. Ontario and the Ancillary Powers Doctrine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018561553476829605,"score_gpt":0.2688407926203571,"score_spread":0.2502792391435275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097606201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80620265,0.0060197976,0.00068398926,0.15328826,0.00024159219,0.00021339841,4.2063783e-7,0.00005346443,0.033296447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885717,0.007885787,0.000035590696,0.00182648,0.00069785846,0.0000014328631,2.6813166e-7,0.0000072999655,0.000973563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978551,0.00012890129,0.00018904787,0.0001432379,0.00032502878,0.0013586419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994856,0.00012954335,0.00009692223,0.00006733623,0.00006215398,0.00015845911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023127892,0.00009929629,0.00016007753,0.000025775018,0.0009110943,0.00014782994,0.00028131015,0.000043950306,0.00007194796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028855805,0.00006929617,0.00007020535,0.0001948299,0.000248803,0.00026951925,0.000050279392,0.0013928987,0.000008873873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033416884,0.00000848999,0.0061667017,0.000005332975,0.00006552127,0.000011696346,0.036333345,0.000010938552,0.000071572336,0.9384965,0.00028594345,0.01820985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003315954,0.00040000534,0.0046543074,0.00008271305,0.00022816546,0.00061918533,0.08256167,0.0000832028,0.0000567514,0.43354398,0.47386885,0.0005852231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0982916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5197913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50495243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000686171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035535144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90771294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102022006","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3721754","title":"Racial Profiling and the Perils of Ancillary Police Powers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology); Gender studies","score_opus":0.01947878356691712,"score_gpt":0.2968553729822947,"score_spread":0.2773765894153776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102022006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433315,0.006885023,0.00048244768,0.04066195,0.0001354559,0.00018106909,0.000001219092,0.000018495099,0.0083028525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937761,0.005086913,0.000036370064,0.000410361,0.00055722793,9.640978e-7,1.3498425e-7,0.0000046990103,0.00012726865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984444,0.00017739413,0.00015803991,0.0000896002,0.0002961794,0.00083442795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995819,0.00010681412,0.00010501084,0.00004439133,0.00006983195,0.0000921067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022230358,0.000059290596,0.00012781635,0.000016636772,0.0004646532,0.000046966477,0.00021303013,0.000036820304,0.000018534492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031287916,0.000040716815,0.00006767127,0.00014742115,0.00037236506,0.00016100288,0.000028049102,0.00060471206,0.0000034467912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038703144,0.000009626929,0.001487572,0.000011393404,0.00004673451,0.0000014204904,0.05787719,0.000006392485,0.00068385265,0.92949516,0.00010496073,0.0098886825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004037958,0.0013651301,0.0011307758,0.000101312995,0.00031346965,0.00027630088,0.6369234,0.00029904553,0.0011037452,0.25954637,0.094254225,0.0006483312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016933304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031733632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66994876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120992634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001635082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35737836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108179891","doi":"10.29173/mlj1225","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada’s Justification of Charter Breaches and its Effect on Black and Indigenous Communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Indigenous; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.050209020745421926,"score_gpt":0.2705179045605164,"score_spread":0.22030888381509445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108179891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99136496,0.00034262665,0.0000015814375,0.0061952793,0.000071308794,0.00009996839,0.000005902883,0.0000031940424,0.0019151998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940723,0.0003069538,0.0000032322994,0.00014808733,0.00011861472,8.454354e-7,4.7857617e-7,0.000003460857,0.000011078924],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991658,0.00022215107,0.00015283638,0.000045842186,0.0002807179,0.00013266299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992725,0.00037019406,0.00011972473,0.000056751065,0.000090839436,0.00008998389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006539867,0.00005662325,0.00011288826,0.000009671747,0.0009813623,0.00006973894,0.00016468018,0.000026665295,0.000007987698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006139475,0.000039812363,0.000017864399,0.000032848,0.0003235103,0.00008753248,0.000023710065,0.00015036785,6.4329544e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011431979,0.00015184216,0.048812944,0.0010184961,0.00031483432,0.000047005848,0.7267318,0.000068426976,0.0070088166,0.12618022,0.009812927,0.07870952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007756907,0.0017591531,0.10704387,0.00043533195,0.00023082207,0.000067954614,0.81989515,0.00022923686,0.010753364,0.0011750876,0.057260077,0.00037423865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.601403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96685094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3654479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003567412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012136617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7547944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108439118","doi":"10.22215/etd/2000-04459","title":"The Evolution of private policing in Canada; towards an effective regulatory famework.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.009477628736582422,"score_gpt":0.3060621006606167,"score_spread":0.29658447192403425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108439118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225615,0.0002985471,0.0000025973902,0.0002131879,0.0003394787,0.0003199502,0.000002461125,0.000012102005,0.07625014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956671,0.00013943303,0.000013754625,0.000023102035,0.00010580224,0.00001988309,0.000012156911,0.0000083113055,0.0040104478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858457,0.0002510695,0.00023449476,0.00018000811,0.00048559412,0.0002642902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936104,0.00018501468,0.00013004938,0.00017589623,0.000081963415,0.00006600977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059799064,0.000108407425,0.00017916234,0.000056453362,0.0003293745,0.000026625416,0.0002917036,0.00014785581,0.00005982227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015193142,0.00008392537,0.000042100706,0.0002509908,0.000080554964,0.00013360677,0.00000703195,0.00020176554,0.0000017884458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091789267,0.00006953264,0.01814855,0.0002567983,0.00005844666,0.000010805123,0.07443075,0.00030856716,0.00046413287,0.4665757,0.0019059307,0.43685287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007154955,0.000039649338,0.9306778,0.00036319328,0.00002717606,2.0046046e-7,0.057179224,0.000036584966,0.00045417625,0.0057296734,0.00521885,0.00020195305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91252923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023879646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036691385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6508894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108470929","doi":"","title":"L’émergence des actions climatiques au Canada à l’ère de l’Accord de Paris","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cairn.info","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.10727923016738093,"score_gpt":0.3439074312594891,"score_spread":0.23662820109210814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108470929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59660965,0.0073680794,0.0021739097,0.149901,0.0019644916,0.0002742841,0.00009746436,0.00015176169,0.24145937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758223,0.0053078607,0.0014465905,0.002721463,0.0012510214,0.00002148838,0.0000034760214,0.000017212273,0.013408569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978783,0.00019923982,0.00032308014,0.00029922623,0.00038520322,0.00091495423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00030881097,0.00012927887,0.0001832028,0.00014157731,0.00079777703],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039674467,0.00020637563,0.00024056339,0.000019299536,0.0010629769,0.00010542245,0.0004584688,0.00016786746,0.0028673424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081942586,0.00023356613,0.00012383032,0.0006974204,0.0006663738,0.00058897096,0.000093932926,0.00031245526,0.0001654243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006387188,0.00008799329,0.17093702,0.00067127345,0.00009503386,0.00024131485,0.19456492,0.0006313111,0.00066633144,0.2400784,0.34391657,0.048045978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006663527,0.000087226115,0.014123012,0.00016212945,0.00010639452,0.000013661531,0.017970774,0.0004622276,0.0008109452,0.0011091586,0.9647716,0.0003162081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6208551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044188863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054165376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109532656","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.32.2.07","title":"Suzanne Zaccour, <i>La fabrique du viol</i>, Montréal, Leméac, 2019.","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.024816780961681918,"score_gpt":0.24242419461433629,"score_spread":0.21760741365265437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109532656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23935445,0.06622,0.000094050934,0.6691166,0.0013345483,0.00023051658,0.00007333871,0.000010308452,0.023566194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607687,0.013869912,0.00005221641,0.015249333,0.0019243959,0.0000052490673,0.000001661016,0.000030646046,0.008097905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997305,0.00068340375,0.00059468136,0.00024920018,0.00025120185,0.0009165533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962178,0.0006519498,0.000421362,0.00018288907,0.00020610506,0.0023199301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028734845,0.00026432687,0.0006649992,0.000073114956,0.00070059573,0.00048792578,0.00072005595,0.00019973148,0.00053437916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049863773,0.00022630146,0.00026044564,0.00032567236,0.0018251553,0.00070045283,0.000053164833,0.00075873104,0.00008159616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023165453,0.000027648539,0.0006650723,0.00012050448,0.00016961175,0.0011373104,0.124027126,0.000095949435,0.000011925816,0.7760909,0.08953744,0.007884854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001128633,0.00026267866,0.00025488116,0.00043060322,0.00010982823,0.000612083,0.014170813,0.000114112605,0.000006887173,0.049586948,0.93303996,0.00028259715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15887451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26826754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8435025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049324136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013021218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9228306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109580876","doi":"10.7202/1075599ar","title":"The Presumption of Restraint and Implicit Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Statute; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Sovereignty; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042840599871330924,"score_gpt":0.3357891345843867,"score_spread":0.29294853471305576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109580876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14215131,0.0016856221,0.00003368593,0.019337833,0.00059071905,0.00010083868,0.000014953144,0.00001933208,0.8360657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841547,0.00093957805,0.00013275455,0.000111194175,0.00014711318,7.9162743e-7,1.9871257e-7,0.0000029057253,0.00025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.00015134271,0.0001594979,0.00007369707,0.00024543024,0.0001658216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994441,0.00016880949,0.000078413825,0.00008031247,0.00013781845,0.0000904918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007914411,0.000040102033,0.00007074062,0.0000053930776,0.0039977343,0.00010222727,0.00011069839,0.000034855868,0.000059961712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011261886,0.000028262799,0.00004436954,0.000049252638,0.0003604587,0.00016274182,0.000033756587,0.00013193347,0.0000033745414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001022439,0.000008762346,0.00004664287,0.0000040322802,0.0000069325692,0.0000150133255,0.0003351907,0.0000022216873,0.0007100054,0.9928055,0.00015143353,0.00590408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008602494,0.000026398247,0.0010823997,0.00003970527,0.00001561294,0.000093105395,0.0019520068,0.000002715483,0.001645712,0.024459131,0.9705508,0.000046430967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041191718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087390386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028347185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015418766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109785129","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2020.1822892","title":"Sitting in limbo or being the flaming Phoenix: the relevance of the archival discipline to the admissibility of digital evidence in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives and Manuscripts","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Tianjin Municipal Education Commission","keywords":"Relevance (law); China; Phoenix; Context (archaeology); Law; Transition (genetics); Political science; Computer security; Internet privacy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.07647964900657235,"score_gpt":0.3206665596465246,"score_spread":0.24418691063995224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109785129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92433256,0.00025816905,0.00010460304,0.072537385,0.000073026036,0.0004270701,0.0000055161745,0.000006218099,0.0022554656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990371,0.00022743101,0.00008341602,0.00034016403,0.00009873736,0.000010730853,2.35012e-7,0.000005035066,0.00019716969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857235,0.00031951442,0.00032413576,0.00023984924,0.000287569,0.0002565747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755895,0.0019684278,0.000117950614,0.00027674256,0.000011547383,0.0000663667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008105477,0.00009884271,0.0001657359,0.000018948418,0.00042328658,0.000073700125,0.0007851136,0.000013688741,0.0000034099742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027928853,0.000040634855,0.00006993231,0.00034378073,0.00065265514,0.00022290145,0.00054349523,0.00025205236,5.5407975e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054868875,0.00006821654,0.08721317,0.00019375248,0.000012155802,0.000007947727,0.78632486,0.0003313674,0.0042188466,0.018762605,0.00012571021,0.10219268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016509634,0.00015938855,0.93277377,0.0010614074,0.000022314149,0.00000253823,0.042735077,0.0012575609,0.0008513467,0.016519051,0.0043096826,0.00014274895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014191042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043610656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8455606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010339338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009126811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3343546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111591130","doi":"10.3968/11932","title":"On the Regulation and Improvement of the Right of Prosecutorial Counter-Appeal in Plea Bargaining","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Appeal; Dilemma; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Criminal procedure; China; Sentence; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02406311713391468,"score_gpt":0.2745460662645503,"score_spread":0.2504829491306356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111591130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172388,0.000011619114,0.0000031521843,0.016026484,0.0002596165,0.00030206694,0.000011594018,0.000003541631,0.066143125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920034,0.0000017754113,0.0000038727253,0.0005975552,0.00016403261,0.0000033140693,1.2907938e-7,0.0000016051232,0.00002739891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990588,0.000053967546,0.00012420522,0.0001324637,0.00041847152,0.00021213831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959564,0.0000806805,0.000078232995,0.000061262865,0.00007018771,0.00011399277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096087455,0.000040696134,0.0000722304,0.000026089814,0.0006548023,0.000039410203,0.0003499176,0.000031854684,0.000037708305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005245411,0.000027195425,0.000020756934,0.00056446,0.001299124,0.000117925534,0.000032608023,0.00007453417,7.5298715e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013399909,0.00000535596,0.005170491,0.000007432725,0.0000013411176,5.798063e-7,0.04861463,0.0000023721732,0.0059605115,0.93719697,0.0007482878,0.0022786236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019334832,0.0011721858,0.44683,0.0006687931,0.00008298508,0.0000011237879,0.21164075,0.0016835704,0.027106542,0.10573123,0.20190051,0.0012488104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057544228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13306545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8314657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020386928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008938274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94873166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112642154","doi":"","title":"Guides de recherche · Research guides: Canadian Legislation and Case Law: Federal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5680596685653162,"score_gpt":0.5417391408534766,"score_spread":0.02632052771183957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112642154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040763365,0.001353174,0.000020993308,0.0326424,0.0007183177,0.000475872,0.000048003996,0.00009169652,0.9605732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19710054,0.0051408582,0.022964455,0.005144744,0.0068090283,0.000109462424,0.00010877718,0.00011717938,0.76250494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951313,0.0020698411,0.000378463,0.0005411647,0.0007255498,0.0011536524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955274,0.0023996856,0.000084123676,0.0003840066,0.0007149877,0.00088982354],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017427398,0.00023305157,0.00029206977,0.00029786953,0.0031228194,0.0011416627,0.0005311331,0.0018457348,0.001228798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070366925,0.00022400996,0.000079909194,0.00034329543,0.001221033,0.000459617,0.00010966591,0.002305946,0.000083354586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006661897,0.000008529989,0.00020563633,0.00005542258,0.00001462671,0.000969381,0.0074884803,3.5667819e-7,0.000022700102,0.14375196,0.83630955,0.011166687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053745018,0.000035179153,0.000029146864,0.00011991842,0.00001936361,0.00022081789,0.007129729,0.000012715876,0.00003137721,0.028653853,0.9634179,0.00027627172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99621034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19806825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013593015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062191254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115887807","doi":"10.29173/wclawr37","title":"The Right to Silence and the Pendulum Swing: Variations in Canadian and Scottish Criminal Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Right to a fair trial; Presumption of innocence; Justiciability; Constitutional right; Common law; Statute; Human rights","score_opus":0.035821348309807786,"score_gpt":0.3124186517150486,"score_spread":0.27659730340524086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115887807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005267776,0.06213963,0.000054440887,0.8473197,0.00038784705,0.0018980392,0.000011433861,0.00004384896,0.082877256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519553,0.024195064,0.000018787832,0.023425026,0.00015411743,0.000062529616,9.230812e-7,0.000005697223,0.0001825526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984489,0.00058450626,0.00024371028,0.00020300795,0.00022033138,0.0002995548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988756,0.00052398286,0.00006789363,0.0001935261,0.00007802698,0.00026097408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022484276,0.000097723845,0.00018027036,0.000009441898,0.002096389,0.0002456864,0.00034145667,0.000033923458,0.00014446654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051312114,0.000052835436,0.000036570986,0.0003019337,0.00079241436,0.00021319419,0.00006125713,0.00018754594,0.000057647434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008842376,0.000002075429,0.000064683016,0.00008144545,0.000004889384,0.000001941026,0.004792393,0.0000010334089,0.0000020988664,0.9914068,0.001441187,0.00219261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103997445,0.000019130448,0.00072865887,0.00038737743,0.00008975581,0.0000066801485,0.0011316374,0.00006287828,0.0000023328396,0.0019958764,0.99538505,0.00008662029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.857935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99394387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006801378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001624691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117581872","doi":"","title":"SHOPKEEPER’S PRIVILEGE: COMING TO A STORE NEAR YOU?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Privilege (computing); Law; Corporation; Political science; Business; Liability; Computer security","score_opus":0.04474109172410389,"score_gpt":0.33428936882677385,"score_spread":0.28954827710266995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117581872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044234473,0.07340329,0.000004172076,0.6814727,0.0009551382,0.0028936418,0.000029688914,0.0000651649,0.19694173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331464,0.009423429,0.00013313946,0.041546844,0.00028036936,0.000041401872,0.000003174201,0.000021308277,0.015403886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884033,0.00018186477,0.00014167426,0.00017059402,0.0002578908,0.0004076565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989464,0.00007195639,0.000034693112,0.00037496464,0.000062522166,0.00050946133],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013268626,0.00008724336,0.00019708124,0.000022574657,0.0007032684,0.00011140031,0.0005738694,0.00003987338,0.002685826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032591328,0.00006506263,0.00007468606,0.00026602575,0.00011231006,0.00010049801,0.00003257408,0.0001326524,0.0044582677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058687147,0.000010760279,0.0036841526,0.0012640539,0.000027174663,0.000038141443,0.01874077,0.000009211298,0.000012448596,0.3098623,0.55458844,0.11175672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019140836,0.000012561585,0.0005776112,0.001187799,0.00002465649,0.0000022776364,0.00026352273,0.0000028729921,5.261357e-7,0.00009092932,0.99771506,0.00010303603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51483977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9147558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88891196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036016575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001006492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118406741","doi":"10.15173/ijrr.v3i2.4582","title":"Shifts in the significant risk threshold","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Risk and Recovery","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.021875635667998473,"score_gpt":0.3146973945310843,"score_spread":0.2928217588630858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118406741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98559314,0.0016913004,0.00020512738,0.006210642,0.001197954,0.000024884732,0.000011765537,0.0000021088317,0.005063052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768278,0.022086082,0.00014769142,0.00022607749,0.0005963634,4.5877061e-7,5.624498e-7,0.0000020951659,0.000112852664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891436,0.00022352173,0.00021629267,0.00007104134,0.00048250207,0.00009229984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989103,0.0005978838,0.00019819771,0.000048043992,0.00020447295,0.000041068066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001441096,0.000043581767,0.000085529406,0.000059317255,0.0001199704,0.00015378601,0.00027714524,0.00003658497,0.00007413534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007747491,0.000028400791,0.000081539605,0.00008540501,0.000086978085,0.00025668807,0.000025873387,0.00025238574,0.0000046537416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005581507,0.00043411276,0.5962363,0.000009607422,0.00022702858,0.002279652,0.04723851,0.0006939486,0.00028809096,0.046094507,0.013931824,0.29200825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086802617,0.00014263266,0.51235175,0.00029064142,0.00010682768,0.00016758328,0.03464851,0.00005835153,0.00020565515,0.13304035,0.3178931,0.0002265687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010921016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023933332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30396125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040383202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015722099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16509381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121157541","doi":"","title":"The Institutional and Substantive Effectsof the Human Rights Act in the United Kingdom","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; International law; Law; Kingdom; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.054285899526758226,"score_gpt":0.343612094592552,"score_spread":0.28932619506579377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121157541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622692,0.00020712372,0.000029035502,0.009476824,0.0002311567,0.00016566199,0.0000012698396,0.000012200728,0.027607543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987201,0.00015906645,0.000007341567,0.0005236721,0.0004960218,0.0000050178214,0.0000011627375,0.00000381505,0.00008376936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980885,0.0007503428,0.00018692571,0.0001069715,0.000531846,0.0003354218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.001019632,0.00009966096,0.0001348465,0.00008283805,0.0000697729],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029509687,0.00009494621,0.000090823225,0.000036763857,0.010540209,0.00058400695,0.00057703396,0.000052074756,0.00003617437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001153375,0.000040468476,0.000054149863,0.00038585573,0.0013122999,0.00027869892,0.000037717,0.00051047705,0.00000877851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398667,0.000029333503,0.0047508413,0.0000014696435,0.00001281854,0.00017730196,0.008959521,0.000023366683,0.000030732925,0.9850154,0.0004430644,0.00052215566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028739581,0.000046792582,0.042085614,0.000057908488,0.00002262208,0.0002897136,0.0024467576,0.000016608941,0.000015883386,0.028322114,0.9263151,0.00009347967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022545557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19913916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9566933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062555555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058500977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121225154","doi":"","title":"Sniffing Out the Ancillary Powers Implications of the Dog Sniff Cases","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Doctrine; Dissent; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Search and seizure; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.038769248112420794,"score_gpt":0.3250363933978203,"score_spread":0.28626714528539954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121225154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6819465,0.0016575966,0.000045057597,0.1015416,0.00068825745,0.0005842546,0.000029265711,0.00011198036,0.21339545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945231,0.000106743275,0.00008285786,0.003028823,0.00025457647,0.000008680596,0.0000010942807,0.0000056951626,0.001988427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873465,0.00016631083,0.00022384142,0.00019058508,0.00037107637,0.00031351412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881536,0.00032306777,0.0001232133,0.00050081324,0.00012302813,0.00011454235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006125185,0.00010076196,0.00012815685,0.000015105109,0.0012265467,0.00010393995,0.0007135577,0.000068423586,0.00019920639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059597666,0.00006252089,0.00013693454,0.00025969627,0.00044599874,0.0002445309,0.00006065407,0.0001919349,0.00007715955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001700753,0.00009490933,0.012819789,0.000013466883,0.000020087748,0.00000783628,0.0066440613,0.000035328405,0.0033027076,0.94003266,0.030909037,0.006103125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018397234,0.000086884385,0.21793775,0.00012207626,0.00008111742,0.000018711906,0.0061351005,0.000004483466,0.0012871749,0.028680688,0.74516505,0.00029695278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006552644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01638388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076734286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001926574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99056816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121240205","doi":"","title":"Offence Definitions, Conclusive Presumptions, and Slot Machines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Normative; Nothing; Function (biology); Law; Criminal law; Epistemology; Position (finance); Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.047114428625259434,"score_gpt":0.32527035994316905,"score_spread":0.2781559313179096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121240205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12674402,0.0013840782,0.00041056954,0.023690758,0.0016556468,0.00021671667,0.00002995363,0.000096339805,0.8457719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942148,0.0018760756,0.00225507,0.0005044415,0.000675836,0.0000058189526,0.0000025272132,0.000009035844,0.00045643313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880457,0.00014559439,0.0002154101,0.00016614905,0.00036192272,0.00030633953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903554,0.00025021014,0.0001207791,0.00012722057,0.00016679813,0.00029945717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007967542,0.00010774244,0.00013186644,0.000037026635,0.0026731025,0.00035525172,0.00027059935,0.00009901598,0.000678801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026820792,0.00009618724,0.00006229656,0.000073590025,0.0006448211,0.00054405816,0.00006707001,0.00054098445,0.00006801926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012620297,0.00003065853,0.0011035277,0.000006527238,0.000008769392,0.000034577344,0.0015842189,0.000002320256,0.0008137218,0.99191386,0.0014401879,0.0030490127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005095524,0.00009406587,0.005820084,0.00012049487,0.00009114231,0.00094069244,0.0027922809,0.000112896174,0.00018684953,0.7648658,0.22406434,0.00040176866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037500586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3452021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86747074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025867892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009859774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121386091","doi":"","title":"The 'Great Writ' Reinvigorated? Habeas Corpus in Contemporary Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Law; Writ; Political science; Doctrine; Charter; Sociology; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.044504727123854684,"score_gpt":0.29174367547162167,"score_spread":0.247238948347767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121386091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5635832,0.018229736,0.000006736067,0.030244788,0.0029545713,0.00067074544,0.000026605101,0.00012726495,0.38415638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883171,0.00017910576,0.000031327127,0.0015133383,0.0005196407,0.000027320142,0.0000048177735,0.000013213044,0.009394188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979017,0.00035107616,0.00028709075,0.00020602389,0.000554362,0.0006997656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867654,0.0004008088,0.000094520765,0.0003173771,0.000071119626,0.00043963068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013240232,0.00014340797,0.00018313903,0.00001824509,0.0009969905,0.00017152242,0.0004731582,0.000098305485,0.00019822484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038731514,0.000112391725,0.000048628313,0.00029714085,0.0003576201,0.0006334809,0.00006701881,0.00030267346,0.00015747445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091643225,0.00006285717,0.23986013,0.000021353946,0.000023318526,0.000093666145,0.002119971,0.0000071515346,0.000093167415,0.57477385,0.18069406,0.0021588213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001658934,0.00001665809,0.0110547915,0.000047170957,0.000006780196,0.0000028007062,0.0020663666,0.0000034712814,0.00013716152,0.0011624902,0.98515755,0.00017885737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96928674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003744941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011695152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76681453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121450697","doi":"","title":"Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Canadian Charter","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.022195066896264853,"score_gpt":0.2671570873081357,"score_spread":0.24496202041187085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121450697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.832014,0.00013416364,0.0000012975415,0.019509126,0.00034218794,0.00022780075,0.000007712243,0.000019814437,0.14774388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870926,0.000011015203,0.000034007047,0.0007152146,0.0001503677,0.000014129186,4.1129277e-7,0.000003765147,0.011978496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936515,0.000066020024,0.0000892935,0.00010542315,0.00016311821,0.000211002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994524,0.00004166524,0.000030135438,0.00015481545,0.00008390801,0.00023704117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000191248,0.000049736125,0.00006752802,0.000018138566,0.0008344262,0.00010755268,0.000174402,0.000057547015,0.0026015544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010059459,0.00003746865,0.00003530768,0.00012000341,0.00034431083,0.00024519063,0.00002433643,0.00008891076,0.00027872733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034956113,0.000032577253,0.07816504,0.000030875846,0.000019797691,0.0000025682236,0.007831682,0.000004523332,0.00060896616,0.77387035,0.13780376,0.0016263775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061153776,0.000013468564,0.073054776,0.000026920714,0.000011795418,0.0000016534487,0.0013791609,0.000005384146,0.00018883703,0.0041454597,0.9210248,0.00008658442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9474372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78322107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060004033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020157653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121563406","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Criminal justice; Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Economics","score_opus":0.06677401222662385,"score_gpt":0.3303004870182024,"score_spread":0.26352647479157854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121563406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729875,0.00004584496,0.000013134541,0.022015814,0.000045037654,0.0001330279,0.0000058913247,0.000010917873,0.004742862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90947926,0.00009586952,0.000022182754,0.0003661141,0.00005062051,0.0000032914872,0.00000239317,0.0000019251888,0.089978375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991498,0.00017827004,0.00011870593,0.00012273208,0.00018954072,0.00024095438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987767,0.00096742494,0.0000338666,0.000068135494,0.00003078818,0.0001230963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004303833,0.00006801207,0.00013213923,0.00002603355,0.00019622738,0.00003594568,0.00012066355,0.000026669071,0.0005392936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000096215146,0.000033510823,0.000012114052,0.00013870899,0.0002972405,0.00009428507,0.000038051927,0.00005192674,0.000017551756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009609896,0.000023329441,0.2749022,0.000008210139,0.00005177801,0.000048308746,0.2917356,0.00007494375,0.000106191575,0.11153083,0.31763408,0.0029235703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022928938,0.000031962805,0.017925251,0.00006660531,0.000013584547,0.0000023099283,0.021056322,0.0000637805,0.00013753554,0.005992151,0.95224196,0.00017564379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99894387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6346079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013516039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023351736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5904886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121620811","doi":"","title":"“Detention” under the Charter after R. v. Grant and R. v. Suberu","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Law; CLARITY; Political science; Scope (computer science); Meaning (existential); Remand (court procedure); Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0501916679819801,"score_gpt":0.3192826819509025,"score_spread":0.2690910139689224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121620811","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18961127,0.12649323,0.0034559586,0.4662458,0.0062155034,0.0064210338,0.0017995768,0.0005187617,0.19923887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98305076,0.009328435,0.000047158108,0.0061031333,0.00039002104,0.00013903012,0.000016339221,0.000008253977,0.0009168741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974952,0.00041305818,0.0004166421,0.0004193977,0.00077400653,0.00048170617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977328,0.0006680547,0.00014552857,0.0005136458,0.00072936213,0.00021059296],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018914151,0.0002682409,0.0003264686,0.000022996623,0.0018858069,0.00025136795,0.00062051945,0.00011227831,0.0019065863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039731475,0.00015698139,0.00017974163,0.00017921923,0.010378371,0.00063189486,0.00017499214,0.00055967347,0.00020360606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003080591,0.000029880235,0.000183162,0.00008136368,0.000022448923,0.00002518158,0.00041539696,7.518137e-7,0.00007648591,0.99354875,0.004983691,0.00060205325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016904659,0.000049232447,0.001802899,0.0006683705,0.00023844345,0.00035538443,0.0013293112,0.000013952394,0.00002252827,0.017412659,0.9775833,0.00035490957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005437854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028154602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97613615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033744815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005501315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121800950","doi":"","title":"Clements v. Clements: A material contribution to the jurisprudence - The Supreme Court of Canada clarifies the law of causation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Windsor; Jurisprudence; Causation; Test (biology); Tort; Political science; Common law; Liability","score_opus":0.0875953254984473,"score_gpt":0.3425636486344378,"score_spread":0.2549683231359905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121800950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910462,0.00004867364,0.000118981516,0.0072038206,0.00064604025,0.0005383937,0.00009423667,0.0000143031675,0.0002893396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985214,0.000023629484,0.0000042180727,0.0005793532,0.00018766234,0.0000028684037,0.000008791997,0.0000072903836,0.0006648024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755335,0.0007196982,0.00026851057,0.00017437167,0.0008252456,0.00045883044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986605,0.0002348922,0.00026761624,0.0003954629,0.0003108646,0.00013066862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002039012,0.00013487895,0.00017086782,0.000044729702,0.0010237959,0.00015758233,0.0010418246,0.00008125658,0.000056548866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014012176,0.000088562854,0.00006246779,0.00032451825,0.00037406097,0.0010223706,0.0002523451,0.00020888401,0.000010840165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022177014,0.00006954606,0.94821054,0.000028966891,0.000076504104,0.0000047090175,0.009657879,0.000024675954,0.001370043,0.0401272,0.00008269988,0.00012544065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003152036,0.000079325175,0.81478935,0.00012271894,0.00016300997,0.000002213199,0.010041314,1.3635623e-7,0.00847696,0.000159718,0.16566376,0.00018626073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06531178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80082154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73550975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030521763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030476335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94091237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121854992","doi":"","title":"L’action collective au secours du droit d’auteur","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.034388022732535155,"score_gpt":0.2863502425095217,"score_spread":0.2519622197769865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121854992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49987817,0.018753253,0.042751603,0.047003265,0.00900973,0.0008907991,0.00004764933,0.00028788132,0.38137767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57538885,0.003733286,0.0012645726,0.0009812432,0.001219045,0.00004659035,0.000011689189,0.00005348945,0.41730124],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566716,0.0011472289,0.00048923446,0.00080144906,0.00067549414,0.001219416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722534,0.0010945385,0.00021242922,0.0003871598,0.00060023763,0.0004803046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013923065,0.00039664484,0.0004860191,0.00013755866,0.002256038,0.00025424943,0.0004670377,0.00083956274,0.0072900048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002643666,0.0004727627,0.00039568433,0.0016264553,0.0022122136,0.00045196922,0.00013770614,0.0013537531,0.0008455985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007567937,0.0012201834,0.004199205,0.00084131234,0.000645788,0.0010370729,0.25258738,0.0006069446,0.0028393972,0.19261421,0.19545662,0.3471951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045891717,0.0002980096,0.00044598815,0.00028985587,0.00028668766,0.00027686005,0.053803515,0.0017992904,0.016310966,0.038852233,0.8864771,0.00070056645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087900935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128567545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6910205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064436747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004294379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121879578","doi":"","title":"Framed by Section 8: Constitutional Protection of Privacy in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Search and seizure; Privacy policy; Expectation of privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Internet privacy; State (computer science); Section (typography); Data Protection Act 1998; Privacy by Design; Constitutional law; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy protection; Political science; Right to privacy; Context (archaeology); Information privacy law; Profiling (computer programming); Business; Law; Computer science; Supreme court; Geography; Advertising","score_opus":0.03578978219224712,"score_gpt":0.24020716226852978,"score_spread":0.20441738007628266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121879578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.788228,0.0000019687075,0.0009265516,0.0005390172,0.00027677722,0.0004869624,0.000019618197,0.00003927403,0.20948184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99163944,0.008152054,0.0000863741,0.000025434128,0.000047764566,0.0000019014204,0.0000042393626,0.0000027958679,0.000040026145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990567,0.00013594919,0.0001152545,0.00017955374,0.0003100573,0.00020249844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961126,0.000055646942,0.00008394782,0.00009201578,0.000103239145,0.000053870477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013089173,0.00007609437,0.000118478354,0.0010194397,0.00031234664,0.0000065720847,0.00017478837,0.00006989374,0.000042398147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013347658,0.00009011716,0.000034699442,0.0033103118,0.00037936788,0.00035652882,0.000034787074,0.00015364504,0.0000019692861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035524152,0.0028472356,0.3587648,0.0008265877,0.00040050157,0.0025242802,0.27741677,0.0014656066,0.002212699,0.20299815,0.030024722,0.11696624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002762528,0.000031726267,0.0010689836,0.000030935495,0.000008544711,0.000005614449,0.002025558,0.00003505581,0.000434001,0.0000013741266,0.9959768,0.00010512227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99509126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012408607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045963367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8153704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121942453","doi":"","title":"Propriété Intellectuelle, Cour Suprême Du Canada Et Droit Civil","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Art; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.00974194046619861,"score_gpt":0.25089572231471535,"score_spread":0.24115378184851674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121942453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41980058,0.07937016,0.020775435,0.32471347,0.012660829,0.0007204136,0.000017787685,0.00012007845,0.14182124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008395,0.02600346,0.00003106544,0.0010562784,0.0024205104,0.000004271363,0.000001789028,0.000036090893,0.06960703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284405,0.00089811103,0.00052893645,0.00038331602,0.0010696726,0.0042759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981583,0.0005607262,0.00030600102,0.00023915985,0.00031198034,0.0004238412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072272653,0.00031886634,0.0004014582,0.000072562114,0.0011206977,0.00022088288,0.0008563079,0.00019548928,0.001069789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011197553,0.00031729185,0.00020265278,0.00046933244,0.00042427247,0.00049486634,0.000085317486,0.0033041579,0.00018773142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059447917,0.0000884741,0.0007518099,0.00002809068,0.00011538084,0.0000233068,0.0019839385,0.00007176902,0.000024079849,0.9243927,0.023506489,0.048954524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033382082,0.00044518046,0.00013846255,0.00012067408,0.00010681391,0.0007658669,0.0062835948,0.00035948324,0.000026621607,0.2521077,0.73893064,0.00038111815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76202595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7154242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055238255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030163456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121976183","doi":"","title":"R. v. Khawaja: At the Limits of Fundamental Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Statute; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Criminal code; Criminal law","score_opus":0.13409736895316915,"score_gpt":0.4401468566850881,"score_spread":0.3060494877319189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121976183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8067398,0.0012273048,0.000009843114,0.010737311,0.0004416392,0.000080086014,0.0000010536609,0.000018267227,0.18074466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96651435,0.000098592136,0.000054543,0.00019714166,0.0003028517,0.0000027351477,3.6004323e-7,0.0000033128708,0.032826126],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932224,0.00007824669,0.000063590305,0.000059760783,0.00024227586,0.00023391574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995049,0.00022774507,0.000045825047,0.00011601003,0.000026738431,0.000078783654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050297426,0.00004292701,0.000059919334,0.000008156136,0.0003785259,0.000013010388,0.00014805574,0.000029962757,0.00085071445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001525967,0.0000300677,0.000035198565,0.00009548238,0.00026494576,0.00011827193,0.00004764412,0.000049234073,0.0002800565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010641934,0.00023340473,0.06530641,0.00011702279,0.0000366307,0.0000033955857,0.4497493,0.000009451604,0.011443027,0.3092155,0.1574133,0.0063661765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006522247,0.000024786626,0.018258901,0.000017830664,0.00007728915,0.0000021664503,0.073408164,0.00000172581,0.0021695253,0.000080190606,0.9058132,0.00008096852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026875727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015661278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7483999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005979882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030318755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93147266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122023523","doi":"","title":"Moral Rights in Canada: An Historical and Comparative View","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Waiver; Jurisprudence; Law; Anonymity; Convention; Moral rights; Legislation; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Prejudice (legal term); Right to property; Human rights; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.07528376541315537,"score_gpt":0.3068270752748078,"score_spread":0.23154330986165242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122023523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868058,0.0055790492,0.000027336857,0.0024663226,0.00015650755,0.00006006235,3.1987912e-7,0.00000658485,0.0048980466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961165,0.0025611382,0.0000231594,0.000057502984,0.00016942674,0.0000012684161,2.6935902e-7,0.0000018691671,0.001068874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816823,0.00018519809,0.00015730648,0.0001178389,0.00029033652,0.0010811033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965614,0.000046042216,0.00005496525,0.000048355152,0.000042660373,0.00015186277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006846668,0.00007088827,0.00016374649,0.00003484142,0.00060366106,0.000016129043,0.00015434524,0.000028910514,0.000024402634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018364048,0.00006092504,0.000020410425,0.00012376376,0.00008609556,0.00027503652,0.000009454196,0.00071180303,0.000002775845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053614,0.000059368016,0.03202921,0.000002505824,0.000016853814,0.00010483892,0.008201748,0.000011919665,0.000009286192,0.95463014,0.0016343248,0.003246169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010463486,0.00070351874,0.05439406,0.00006778893,0.000044034987,0.0014627925,0.024322491,0.00011170093,0.000020887013,0.3796255,0.53750753,0.00069332786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57500464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009183391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110043185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122149169","doi":"","title":"Two Myths of Administrative Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory interpretation; Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Standard of review; Statute; Duty; Legislature; Common law","score_opus":0.04916571809114916,"score_gpt":0.3941677685298033,"score_spread":0.3450020504386541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122149169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25333384,0.0016888226,0.0013407086,0.009075189,0.0005837947,0.00015123146,0.0000024451167,0.00003754157,0.73378646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549097,0.0006274051,0.00010558336,0.00011649533,0.00083399576,9.003e-7,1.9993121e-7,0.0000052109517,0.0028192485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980698,0.00013386151,0.00017723585,0.00009989124,0.0003145235,0.0012046437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994372,0.00007009674,0.00012823711,0.00008150614,0.00019572859,0.00008724794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018948425,0.00006553719,0.000111679125,0.000027527496,0.0005478026,0.000038978804,0.00027321736,0.00003868818,0.0001781823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011107984,0.000057632482,0.000071551694,0.00013637332,0.000652979,0.00023333688,0.000016400758,0.00051136053,0.000054478816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034896373,0.000022056729,0.00012812178,0.0000011251004,0.000021241,0.0000014171868,0.00296534,1.5744547e-7,0.00021642861,0.9930916,0.0001318385,0.0033857976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004284486,0.0013930299,0.0001162684,0.00004980579,0.00005432648,0.0001135338,0.07647521,0.0000037495465,0.0021538867,0.76447576,0.15453516,0.00020084389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020897142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08085022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74215716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030364617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028178832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93592185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122179429","doi":"10.3138/utlj.11117-2","title":"CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND CONCEPTIONS OF PENALITY IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction; German; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Universal jurisdiction; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.03976751809362463,"score_gpt":0.31766872520294265,"score_spread":0.27790120710931804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122179429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84910184,0.00045089392,0.00018515046,0.00085845415,0.00005753101,0.00009350085,0.0000036685833,0.000004292601,0.1492447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897975,0.00031045818,0.0004964283,0.0000082824645,0.000030102528,4.7091422e-8,1.8782892e-7,8.045723e-7,0.00017395196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941057,0.00015612703,0.00009415337,0.00007291574,0.00016677486,0.00009948816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993766,0.000064620086,0.000116498144,0.000039084633,0.00032072773,0.0000824595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025410153,0.000040495856,0.0001302142,0.000015718904,0.00039059666,0.000015636148,0.00010663243,0.00003574916,0.0013766511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017717106,0.000044521385,0.00004225025,0.000025553729,0.00070573925,0.00081842794,0.000023429126,0.00008805849,0.0000027830483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012259363,0.00015193215,0.008147328,0.000015627116,0.0000341627,0.000007656822,0.39339986,0.000017817547,0.00059776596,0.59551805,0.001063052,0.00092415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040772633,0.0001478086,0.16535202,0.000065757216,0.000048943573,0.0000075137477,0.8240432,0.00003714469,0.00004485733,0.003765956,0.005998656,0.00008038398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64015937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5205754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5917521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032104793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006693039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122414803","doi":"","title":"Open justice and suppressing evidence of police methods: the positions in Canada and Australia [Series of two parts] Part 1.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne University law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Series (stratigraphy); Project commissioning; Political science; Criminology; Criminal justice; Publishing; Sociology","score_opus":0.16517730287131535,"score_gpt":0.4365781877813235,"score_spread":0.27140088491000813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122414803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7711804,0.13938728,0.00074549427,0.051868476,0.00060221576,0.0029492879,0.0000880655,0.000027203505,0.033151615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96034276,0.036067635,0.0027899356,0.0003166202,0.000023227314,4.1743448e-7,5.663293e-7,0.0000025718439,0.00045625315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988009,0.00052883005,0.00019928107,0.00012996972,0.00016312204,0.00017795026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987803,0.00074393227,0.00015006549,0.0001383394,0.000096935444,0.00009042423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024734142,0.0000656766,0.00025109458,0.000018114939,0.0003545108,0.000026461224,0.0003677266,0.00002024959,0.00006192772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018082974,0.000055973058,0.000023196388,0.00025379437,0.00049742043,0.00058335165,0.00019020693,0.00008906476,2.6618778e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012555583,0.000057236197,0.01081031,0.0060987445,0.000048155132,0.00006198151,0.012689078,0.000008785169,0.00040686154,0.95540047,0.0036644058,0.010628443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045522788,0.00010859932,0.022624956,0.026479201,0.0015990543,0.000041642517,0.032876737,0.000003941054,0.0013918342,0.0014311747,0.91254395,0.00044367087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98501533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99464977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95396924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010385538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033861597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27266464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122434101","doi":"","title":"Muscutt Misplaced: The Future of Forum of Necessity Jurisdiction in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Connection (principal bundle); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Geology","score_opus":0.010413372428683869,"score_gpt":0.26532788934522583,"score_spread":0.254914516916542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122434101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95564425,0.0011201549,0.000010623747,0.022540215,0.0004792179,0.00018275653,0.000010971559,0.00001251639,0.01999932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986153,0.00013693815,0.000053334454,0.00068838225,0.00018624692,0.000002509352,0.0000013721918,0.0000028494576,0.00031305206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882823,0.00013874317,0.00023412445,0.00013420772,0.0004180883,0.00024658677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942195,0.00009476695,0.0001238837,0.00019833338,0.00007157933,0.00008946759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048142893,0.000075297496,0.00016082748,0.000019590063,0.00022342103,0.000016617618,0.0003202506,0.000064147804,0.00013313825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006166475,0.000058038946,0.000050894178,0.00026348382,0.000118048025,0.00021466496,0.00002006849,0.00017551659,0.0000037747293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000340739,0.0002534831,0.17793567,0.00013931903,0.000034263394,0.00003476462,0.010145073,0.00039811927,0.0023452132,0.6830684,0.07891243,0.046392515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517965,0.00014225062,0.2510708,0.00020639123,0.00004286053,0.0000023692198,0.030346064,0.0000479515,0.0027440968,0.011182354,0.7033981,0.00029879384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99754846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.671886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019749746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071729126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23667596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122457892","doi":"","title":"Police Questioning in the Charter Era: Adjudicative versus Regulatory Rule-making and the Problem of False Confes-sions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Parliament; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Criminal procedure; Silence; Politics","score_opus":0.07814882466621065,"score_gpt":0.36307306211005885,"score_spread":0.2849242374438482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122457892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10831325,0.2953314,0.0020058558,0.16975735,0.0017850997,0.010497123,0.0011331178,0.00025278633,0.41092405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989864,0.007739862,0.00012943239,0.0018232292,0.00022408931,0.00014883562,0.000011119371,0.000005806428,0.000053610045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642247,0.0015447426,0.00054182566,0.00026271684,0.0007567194,0.00047154422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564445,0.0029275343,0.00034194614,0.00039300096,0.0005822908,0.0001108025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048055365,0.00022724371,0.00042148877,0.00003533404,0.0013995995,0.000086831016,0.0006767994,0.000082920786,0.00013172056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007368322,0.0001245498,0.00013422503,0.00028827888,0.010489298,0.00069945306,0.00016047,0.00043133384,0.000021737545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012068606,0.00004369612,0.0003645421,0.00011114267,0.000026266942,0.0000024023436,0.010079307,0.000004375013,0.000007802202,0.98777837,0.0006821739,0.0007792534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030154155,0.000279856,0.0109901605,0.014004183,0.0013028018,0.000492167,0.046406955,0.0000880258,0.000042158135,0.032982413,0.88916063,0.0012352439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017625386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011632632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95479596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007712925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065793376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122546123","doi":"","title":"Small Claims Disputes in Nova Scotia and Access to Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Nova (rocket); Criminology; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0833404281761269,"score_gpt":0.33912659551722435,"score_spread":0.25578616734109744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122546123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91100943,0.00043972835,0.00022331874,0.058177512,0.00044924725,0.0003837352,0.000008762915,0.00009485743,0.02921342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853177,0.00005627729,0.00077162695,0.009808828,0.0005077815,0.000006482347,0.000001727438,0.000011241634,0.0003042446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866575,0.000106655054,0.00020304901,0.0003738651,0.00026563223,0.00038506044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990095,0.0002030772,0.000040669365,0.00014460842,0.00005560433,0.0005465601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003882222,0.00012252302,0.00018814096,0.00003170246,0.00023767976,0.00041654444,0.0005238667,0.000081784485,0.00040201732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061601686,0.0001226134,0.000034101733,0.00044436852,0.00017972906,0.0005971104,0.00022297312,0.00021572858,0.00048788497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003573832,0.00019448563,0.22752549,0.00064327044,0.000035504174,0.00026054628,0.032538477,0.00027080745,0.00225407,0.67290473,0.049935177,0.013080047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001042422,0.0003322564,0.13572028,0.0005410267,0.0001722544,0.000005224913,0.0105372,0.0001615452,0.0012559331,0.0067605083,0.84227467,0.0011966645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041350976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26689947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004957446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000954682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96503276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122678072","doi":"","title":"Crime Victims and Constitutional Rights","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Law; Constitutional right; Supreme court; Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.013721003292570822,"score_gpt":0.3010310579319528,"score_spread":0.287310054639382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122678072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43523848,0.026632639,0.027940514,0.054019812,0.0011764633,0.0003900972,0.0000049800815,0.00019784401,0.45439917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930841,0.0022872337,0.00015566986,0.00016180509,0.00096317613,0.0000010826811,3.710082e-7,0.0000024668636,0.003344093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998231,0.00007237465,0.00012842454,0.00011163434,0.00027948167,0.0011770937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999655,0.000057792633,0.000050821734,0.000046996673,0.00006702464,0.00012236934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013507258,0.00006818694,0.00008124792,0.0000417474,0.0011233499,0.00008837249,0.00014208777,0.000051115698,0.00018019868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058175156,0.000058242447,0.000041987063,0.00007255766,0.0010010104,0.00040127288,0.000014596462,0.00063271064,0.00008723114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109812,0.000015502445,0.00027701294,5.8131064e-7,0.000014175826,0.0000019296451,0.0005289233,0.0000031730299,0.000031788953,0.9918329,0.00040103126,0.0068819975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021395215,0.00006235441,0.0003409619,0.000013528656,0.000024191093,0.00033347492,0.0017196009,0.000011842892,0.000032190812,0.43659425,0.56053543,0.00011823744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038118166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005026209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56013435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054071756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019291417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8640013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122694758","doi":"","title":"Why Can't We Be Like France? How the Right to Bear Arms Got Left Out of the Declaration of Rights and How Gun Registration was Decreed Just In Time For the Nazi Occupation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Opposition (politics); Possession (linguistics); Politics; Left-wing politics; Martial law","score_opus":0.04641019634464937,"score_gpt":0.299991437671563,"score_spread":0.2535812413269136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122694758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43762434,0.00012779779,0.006712051,0.5524753,0.00029643413,0.0014622941,0.000032523832,0.00001698303,0.0012523194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99165386,0.000047652695,0.00019491215,0.0006653939,0.00009411797,0.000024330551,0.0000019498343,0.000003986274,0.007313771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989926,0.00014830631,0.00015275294,0.00016445994,0.0003848098,0.00015707672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988778,0.00051583396,0.00015990435,0.00023848432,0.00016853424,0.000039409915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085657625,0.0000847238,0.00012023939,0.000027000613,0.00039507027,0.00008406384,0.00032495992,0.00007761974,0.000049983715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030491303,0.00003344261,0.00005369231,0.00012979895,0.00028070062,0.00028680422,0.000027545588,0.000046800094,0.000001626463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010151942,0.00032092465,0.028880706,0.0002120522,0.00014421057,0.0000018399849,0.20501788,0.000074179305,0.10786402,0.1607718,0.47326112,0.022436079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013087644,0.00045604387,0.057726525,0.00055062096,0.00020352511,0.0000023565565,0.010631732,0.0008822145,0.06876146,0.020008061,0.8389783,0.0004904101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053425203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22285824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5540295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041315896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008336914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8076328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122798332","doi":"","title":"Searching for Smith: The Constitutionality of Mandatory Sentences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Parliament; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Punitive damages; Political science; Proportionality (law); Constitutional review; Constitution; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.09996215917625473,"score_gpt":0.391120778265037,"score_spread":0.29115861908878227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122798332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169484,0.0016066531,0.0068490584,0.023589673,0.0009831985,0.00033557942,0.000019640756,0.000029408382,0.92489195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978179,0.00041472816,0.0007226162,0.00021070805,0.000462495,0.0000038488215,5.6799985e-7,0.0000030994047,0.00036406855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987654,0.00020847356,0.0002182764,0.00009706298,0.00045264664,0.00025811084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898756,0.00045580475,0.00013498108,0.000091796945,0.00021784489,0.00011201515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00251274,0.00006143374,0.000110683664,0.000018261055,0.0020377005,0.00011633304,0.00034587784,0.000038575068,0.00016170045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026172466,0.00004128854,0.00011758113,0.00007575291,0.0010416247,0.00029932932,0.000028069291,0.00018598881,0.000006933622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039206367,0.000028548335,0.0029697446,0.000010681821,0.000016060661,0.000008150873,0.0009804949,0.000035070443,0.0000574162,0.99281985,0.0006835197,0.0023512335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004155024,0.00008724925,0.0025869126,0.00020193512,0.0000631944,0.000216616,0.010532866,0.0000786311,0.00019192878,0.30499628,0.6804613,0.00016759663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034203097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10722784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95612305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048659855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026587673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122808219","doi":"","title":"The Oversight of Executive Police Relations in Canada: The Constitution, the Courts, Administrative Processes and Democratic Governance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Politics; Political science; Separation of powers; Constitution; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013859310018390253,"score_gpt":0.27402845296017175,"score_spread":0.2601691429417815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122808219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68314296,0.03249046,0.0009415597,0.24620989,0.00032867873,0.00079292053,0.000019163786,0.000011022787,0.036063366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908252,0.008480495,0.000004589162,0.00012442356,0.000057913567,0.0000048908173,1.4227362e-7,0.0000019008451,0.0005004591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986453,0.00013842637,0.00018437844,0.00007841872,0.0003264906,0.0006269761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888885,0.00065638,0.0001997132,0.0000728996,0.00014532162,0.00003680698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011434825,0.00006552877,0.000077586585,0.000007790849,0.0016806915,0.000049128354,0.00028157487,0.000022580698,0.0000035379132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005387746,0.000033022625,0.0000199645,0.00023255139,0.0007491603,0.00019553112,0.000015683101,0.0006047063,5.848094e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001967326,0.000008327831,0.0016487871,0.0000022173463,0.000020541933,0.0000011329862,0.0066608707,0.00007826434,0.0000031577042,0.990889,0.0003601149,0.0003079238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046655358,0.00014415501,0.015091078,0.00014924325,0.000081925886,0.00018631705,0.32747847,0.000010655546,0.00010220165,0.62328494,0.03283889,0.0001655775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8089887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99836826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36760405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017250032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04528411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122961693","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.30619","title":"Wither International Law? Security Certificates, the Supreme Court, and the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; International human rights law; Political science; Human rights; Reservation of rights; International law; Public international law; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.01103091151819874,"score_gpt":0.2604447960094575,"score_spread":0.24941388449125879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122961693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701724,0.00014069711,8.4195966e-7,0.025561502,0.0011419731,0.0001454624,0.000034187036,0.0000026042255,0.0028003124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764174,0.00008055092,0.000011749862,0.0015574181,0.00027744446,0.000004305075,0.0000011391763,0.0000073976075,0.00041826343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980232,0.00021449133,0.00035771728,0.00015454498,0.00093596324,0.00031406057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882406,0.00037360465,0.0002297826,0.00021060505,0.00017372602,0.0001882237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011975094,0.00012338538,0.00020842573,0.00003116151,0.0006067037,0.00008685955,0.000636091,0.000052724372,0.00032630796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015407376,0.000066331675,0.00004522783,0.00012700465,0.0005116009,0.00011358979,0.000039533006,0.0007506139,9.085376e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022070273,0.000025111009,0.0023973119,0.000008846459,0.000048287588,0.00015136457,0.00047394293,0.000017506158,0.00018964244,0.98966926,0.0066561596,0.00014187631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042736199,0.000012286224,0.0036391588,0.000050147533,0.000014905053,0.000043874043,0.00010961219,0.000077948665,0.00020203498,0.005038571,0.990284,0.0001000849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98911554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9846307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005394157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026325197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4669977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123230603","doi":"","title":"Dismantling Regulatory Structures: Canada's Long-Gun Registry as Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Legislation; Law; Repeal; Gun control; Federalism; Parliament; Supreme court; Political science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.01987016449860858,"score_gpt":0.2900390755757322,"score_spread":0.27016891107712365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123230603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665439,0.0002159533,0.002445458,0.0019403935,0.00059103296,0.00034654088,0.000017583525,0.00007081281,0.027828332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675,0.000016164762,0.00019172911,0.00026165522,0.0006651206,0.00002158674,0.000012304442,0.0000072882763,0.0020741725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983784,0.00016689539,0.00026331758,0.0003063311,0.000554975,0.00033010702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986702,0.0004038136,0.00013450762,0.00025614546,0.00029816208,0.00023717104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086866564,0.000114194816,0.0001565661,0.000067131245,0.0013091823,0.000096381955,0.00025900058,0.00009556804,0.00014182283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023840931,0.00013869791,0.000052971453,0.00021505497,0.00041193268,0.00020963389,0.00003233105,0.00018286162,0.000014334908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009113521,0.000059954433,0.019657178,0.000036552236,0.000024061823,0.0012821002,0.0024982875,0.0013332794,0.000008796794,0.9722489,0.0012609985,0.0015807635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033165854,0.00024037057,0.10525083,0.0008088815,0.0006332341,0.018261606,0.14017522,0.0044069136,0.0001470558,0.18978196,0.5342231,0.002754271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61147314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9083562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78246695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010636018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029736883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123231957","doi":"","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice & the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Justiciability; Duty; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Rule of law; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05603704184581181,"score_gpt":0.3688218263243543,"score_spread":0.31278478447854247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123231957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92645514,0.00031671897,0.0025560902,0.028970104,0.00093231926,0.0002640418,0.0000035751984,0.0000043996215,0.04049761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929804,0.00009304183,0.00008078307,0.0002399889,0.00015052417,0.0000038046,1.8781091e-7,0.0000019659278,0.00013166294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981157,0.00008441633,0.00024742418,0.000100951926,0.0004620938,0.000989407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933517,0.0001612914,0.0001435942,0.00014575751,0.0001290107,0.0000851856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030123808,0.000060858692,0.00010510245,0.000020000492,0.0019608717,0.00013777844,0.0010620897,0.000023006423,0.00003443304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006832409,0.00004580453,0.000023636616,0.00006498302,0.00047284437,0.00029172288,0.000111324916,0.00050438667,0.000003989676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021039272,0.0000148902745,0.012377396,0.000007522547,0.000011835647,0.000002183664,0.001164667,0.000099802004,0.0000130740655,0.9808344,0.00013405035,0.005319107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009738026,0.00012812002,0.19957943,0.000403594,0.0002544361,0.00009187201,0.1277427,0.000045484903,0.0005934015,0.44155157,0.22786292,0.0007726812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87663573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53928286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002782806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046906807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123265210","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1128","title":"The Charter of Whiteness: Twenty-Five Years of Maintaining Racial Injustice in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Charter; Political science; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Racial profiling; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Critical race theory; Mass incarceration; Race (biology); Criminology; Racism; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05880741501285712,"score_gpt":0.33170948987890886,"score_spread":0.2729020748660517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123265210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35983273,0.2882259,0.000118701115,0.048333675,0.0042253123,0.0072031324,0.00017160119,0.00012433047,0.29176462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98571813,0.013015474,0.00004099611,0.00093425467,0.00017192819,0.000028469314,0.0000022417719,0.0000075263883,0.00008100167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763227,0.00068900693,0.00048219974,0.00017047409,0.0006320371,0.00039399302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984914,0.00060037285,0.00021082496,0.00031616696,0.00027271893,0.00010853823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035320937,0.00010807073,0.00033189522,0.000035446687,0.0007997613,0.00003270583,0.00072203565,0.00006347055,0.000037401715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068076054,0.00007509729,0.000110802175,0.00035359722,0.0006932311,0.00015762696,0.000036602712,0.00019282223,0.000025586633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003817123,0.000039375343,0.00041308807,0.005971566,0.000026308257,0.00012266284,0.0630922,0.000010650614,0.000010275592,0.92192507,0.0038361002,0.004514506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002392361,0.000113408874,0.0039548352,0.01052807,0.001451,0.000061683866,0.076755,0.000034650715,0.00001035426,0.00024274514,0.90628725,0.0003217575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2916815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6265938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92168236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017013028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064962264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7130352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123285976","doi":"","title":"Beyond Finality: R v Hart and the Ghosts of Convictions Past","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Confession (law); Federal Rules of Evidence; Political science; Admissible evidence; Suspect; Reasonable doubt; Duty","score_opus":0.0477950287016182,"score_gpt":0.3620190832449032,"score_spread":0.31422405454328495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123285976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23984781,0.00012861259,0.00007838904,0.09682622,0.00022318,0.00013050168,0.0000034076577,0.000014682984,0.6627472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910826,0.00009984155,0.000061626604,0.00020368799,0.000087929715,0.0000029165033,1.2622435e-7,9.898857e-7,0.008460258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963504,0.000044211516,0.0000648843,0.0000618199,0.00011574007,0.00007828408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995488,0.00014912168,0.000052301875,0.00017221783,0.00004502801,0.00003255383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005495943,0.000025976897,0.000064652,0.0000055863084,0.0011446822,0.00009966901,0.00017232326,0.000020057889,0.00018675122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022770702,0.00001597678,0.000024784431,0.00001528979,0.0012563906,0.00015414137,0.0000472237,0.00003224646,0.000013387157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013533549,0.0000073729752,0.010689556,0.0000040552227,0.0000046867876,4.4472714e-7,0.0041876743,5.245755e-8,0.000017485207,0.97677076,0.005652313,0.002652051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007076154,0.000038455408,0.22474712,0.000037117195,0.00007280643,0.0000026169444,0.014013831,0.000024791063,0.00025080133,0.09658703,0.6633807,0.00013714269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014538791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009643302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88018376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004389335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025491037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99202347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123377603","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1023","title":"The Unfortunate Triumph of Form over Substance in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Judicial review; Law; Administrative law; Statutory law; Political science; Judicial deference; Judicial activism; Autonomy; Statutory interpretation; Standard of review; Action (physics); Judicial opinion; Judicial discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.06541899757497943,"score_gpt":0.3560236760628816,"score_spread":0.29060467848790217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123377603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05231624,0.0013027343,0.000007071459,0.0035064926,0.00050587114,0.0001231315,0.000010672017,0.0000063768202,0.9422214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983094,0.00044905324,0.000063024934,0.00028225413,0.00023859895,0.000003742491,6.1535593e-7,0.0000071073346,0.00064623606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982771,0.0001487539,0.00031592874,0.00008369612,0.00040539933,0.0007690835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.0002232037,0.00016845035,0.00012167397,0.00010638589,0.0005465969],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021167607,0.000096270036,0.00014846127,0.00003231861,0.001347231,0.00011933163,0.00036312998,0.00008305922,0.00017746199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090762536,0.000070831265,0.000083104474,0.00015762192,0.00048759495,0.0007611872,0.000011293913,0.00029962018,0.000012996248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030460993,0.000020483698,0.004589644,0.000003678181,0.000008493519,0.00001544198,0.006334559,0.0000012481938,0.000015511978,0.98790276,0.00029482934,0.00078289455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005503025,0.00010581892,0.0150345825,0.00015534165,0.000036405007,0.00006646383,0.012321328,0.00001163499,0.00060887844,0.12233924,0.84843564,0.00033438325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.921489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99948907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003278128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046081556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123466186","doi":"","title":"Toward a harmonized approach to animal welfare law in Canada - A comment.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Law and economics; Political science; Public economics; Law; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.08945803012929887,"score_gpt":0.2655153726892904,"score_spread":0.1760573425599915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123466186","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008531974,0.00007333416,0.0000027421788,0.88343614,0.00051872013,0.0011885362,0.0000541019,0.00003406001,0.11383919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39473486,0.000008195949,0.00009211362,0.599864,0.0020229649,0.0017845203,0.0000375568,0.000022804348,0.0014329656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700713,0.0002696928,0.0002819421,0.00049324025,0.0008423089,0.0011057043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921274,0.000096433825,0.00009205269,0.00026990357,0.00007815058,0.00025073305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063750055,0.00023062403,0.00039266804,0.00007415904,0.00031098683,0.00017156468,0.00083587837,0.00029126453,0.00010297361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015462778,0.00023045376,0.000073360636,0.000309073,0.00017868206,0.00012899819,0.0001441347,0.00068976195,0.000018832838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029670246,0.000014201831,0.00010327601,0.00006782997,0.000012626497,0.00012001183,0.0014170371,1.653196e-7,7.8166615e-8,0.0022475964,0.994438,0.001549504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014149453,0.00000842228,0.0031470405,0.000020257417,0.000021913953,0.0000019598253,0.001043216,0.0000010043373,0.0000024948383,0.000051642623,0.9952655,0.000295057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39388168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017974486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064391596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9397632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123641313","doi":"","title":"A More Lasting Comfort?: The Politics of Minimum Sentences, the Rule of Law and R. v. Ferguson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Rule of law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04272593862801228,"score_gpt":0.33448787251338763,"score_spread":0.29176193388537536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123641313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8491658,0.00036986315,0.000031180585,0.043170005,0.000054176697,0.00012257269,0.0000036018341,0.00001385555,0.10706892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973732,0.00004461664,0.00013589927,0.0009862373,0.00005623353,6.538351e-7,2.1087222e-7,0.0000013321489,0.0014015789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993681,0.000050209346,0.00013703157,0.00006713477,0.00022754383,0.00015002125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994374,0.00030493276,0.0000665455,0.00010118304,0.000056422617,0.000033528915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004002104,0.000043944776,0.00008675286,0.000007434781,0.00035821626,0.00002293275,0.0001885527,0.000025909208,0.00002067732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097804084,0.000022200102,0.00003133733,0.00008077534,0.00052392774,0.000070119386,0.000026487383,0.00004992097,6.1663695e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006688023,0.000028317416,0.0027372092,0.000014679316,0.0000056046506,8.068671e-7,0.02269627,0.0000046019845,0.0003729925,0.971799,0.00091413513,0.0014197078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008019645,0.00083386444,0.07442933,0.0006524584,0.00031537056,0.000028512757,0.4398874,0.0018427512,0.012299059,0.15239407,0.31581625,0.0006989776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018531298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040175044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8194049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011312171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038110422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123693333","doi":"","title":"Improperly obtained evidence in the&#13;\\nCommonwealth: lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Law; Jurisdiction; Convention; Conformity; Scots law; Political science; Legislation; Common law; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.18527211324114032,"score_gpt":0.396091479276055,"score_spread":0.21081936603491466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123693333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601591,0.00054057734,0.00078833464,0.032600317,0.00010608879,0.0009449998,0.00001532592,0.000028639877,0.0048166057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974878,0.0006564538,0.00063669647,0.0001407973,0.000113881375,0.0000027777319,0.0000046214386,0.000010089821,0.0009468968],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745876,0.0004065739,0.00023958021,0.0004033218,0.00072597637,0.0007658091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666137,0.0023770877,0.00012460734,0.0003537666,0.00022092526,0.00026224705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068105296,0.00015366526,0.00028063435,0.0002874007,0.0008976975,0.00009516649,0.0010334032,0.00014910882,0.00004942971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062243117,0.00014466161,0.000096281896,0.0005037413,0.0011186332,0.0007004999,0.00018598564,0.0003121875,0.00001697076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025050426,0.0005679296,0.08018435,0.00088981166,0.000053689488,0.00043420595,0.36731735,0.000004828336,0.0019611795,0.034971092,0.0028692055,0.5082413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026308338,0.0013751918,0.43969494,0.0008586166,0.00006662063,0.000029230789,0.19742668,0.00018485464,0.00006950908,0.0011794381,0.3559517,0.0005323977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025659246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22699825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5077089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013514033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028387838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123816104","doi":"","title":"What Butler Did","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Objectification; Supreme court; Criminal law; Criminal code; Law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10494825153257663,"score_gpt":0.3652403799615271,"score_spread":0.26029212842895044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123816104","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073132603,0.45919842,0.0020804019,0.121302135,0.008652552,0.0032457334,0.00068210723,0.00049979996,0.3970256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93266547,0.058386393,0.00007658691,0.0061420402,0.00086099084,0.000084238796,0.0000394434,0.000010243982,0.0017346002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964972,0.00062639435,0.00052053307,0.00037554206,0.0011099888,0.0008703464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971174,0.0008319119,0.00020425857,0.0005284849,0.00088379934,0.0004341312],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002542739,0.0003188979,0.0004551088,0.000030736956,0.0017644359,0.00030221144,0.00084521534,0.00012385169,0.002963694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010040358,0.00023057483,0.00024650342,0.0002792357,0.006713251,0.003170147,0.00020826932,0.0003760876,0.0010356784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020470927,0.00007076133,0.00020111795,0.00013475295,0.00002426522,0.000016852919,0.0010102628,0.000002224318,0.000017424698,0.97074157,0.02662836,0.0011319092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010672818,0.00003981317,0.00014850184,0.0017563732,0.00017400482,0.00016752876,0.0027113475,0.0000036329952,0.000037383546,0.0035373773,0.9909483,0.0003689635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004836162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035092826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014414711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081843155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123944707","doi":"10.1080/09546553.2018.1432211","title":"Yesterday’s Law: Terrorist Group Listing in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Terrorism and Political Violence","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Terrorism; Listing (finance); Proscription; Yesterday; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.02449064130932022,"score_gpt":0.30980397285378236,"score_spread":0.28531333154446215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123944707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363995,0.00015903944,0.000050657734,0.004109453,0.00049981114,0.00010334156,0.000011046779,0.000032749507,0.05863437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724835,0.00002635882,0.000089103385,0.0019521676,0.0005611856,0.000006289183,0.0000013130747,0.00000609283,0.000109136294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984418,0.0001069361,0.00021028264,0.0002606568,0.00026771796,0.0007125911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922955,0.00020821152,0.000030145275,0.00014105902,0.00003899704,0.000352026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033953038,0.0001072901,0.0001497438,0.000024292956,0.0003450059,0.00005634782,0.00021279315,0.00005828109,0.00009127515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016538623,0.000102589045,0.000018132601,0.00010289432,0.0007625497,0.00019326969,0.00007192367,0.00014757973,0.000023245837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000160586,0.000021365571,0.051732037,0.000030458683,0.0000019697004,0.00006071468,0.0034013276,4.2191992e-8,0.000029761022,0.9359209,0.00039122076,0.008394141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011009184,0.0005662854,0.41730216,0.002940936,0.0000756661,0.00006225296,0.10105077,0.0004634693,0.00047615115,0.17825028,0.295733,0.001978126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75767064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000282375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037068612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.418346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123945254","doi":"","title":"Tracking ‘Terrorists’ or Solidifying Stereotypes? Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act in Light of the Charter’s Equality Guarantee","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Terrorism; Law; Tracking (education); Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0525581576463101,"score_gpt":0.3182461462045441,"score_spread":0.265687988558234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123945254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671576,0.0003273157,0.000016936934,0.0045054974,0.0012590549,0.00035215841,0.000010959426,0.000030298552,0.026340162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715644,0.000049808667,0.000050793155,0.0006582418,0.00016206042,0.000010828649,9.034201e-7,0.00001610432,0.001894797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971168,0.00065812713,0.0005337535,0.0003531581,0.0007184556,0.0006197299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988631,0.00018713508,0.00023926378,0.00046914333,0.0000989167,0.0001424191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014953562,0.00019661408,0.00036607235,0.000038348517,0.0005584551,0.000106733314,0.0006385624,0.0001304122,0.00040243493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005936057,0.00014518294,0.00011718974,0.0003572115,0.00019405542,0.00045528504,0.00006022809,0.0003793306,0.000017889723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045462957,0.0008119309,0.3437632,0.0009936097,0.00018623068,0.00043968827,0.10112135,0.00013245875,0.013744841,0.51757467,0.015812896,0.0049644937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010589638,0.000091333815,0.061597917,0.00096779945,0.000071006914,0.000019703046,0.022688575,0.000020063077,0.014945587,0.0023292273,0.8953545,0.00085530465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73235655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87954164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033196495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014153864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59203887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124354858","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.1.308","title":"Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Secrecy; Acknowledgement; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Confidentiality; Law and economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Masking (illustration); Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19723020262983734,"score_gpt":0.4376579170917017,"score_spread":0.24042771446186437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124354858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7734457,0.009696345,0.0022330633,0.21246418,0.0005369163,0.0003874858,0.0000027804533,0.000006243077,0.0012272237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962984,0.0026975016,0.0001943346,0.00045322726,0.0002653423,0.0000028435254,1.8711265e-7,0.0000027147205,0.00008547427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969513,0.000412688,0.00068867585,0.0001030954,0.0016978079,0.00014647866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957744,0.0020057845,0.000952488,0.00019913638,0.0010303963,0.00003780283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055242935,0.00008373532,0.00019535681,0.0001181693,0.000086495966,0.000060252678,0.0023039542,0.000045084,0.00007296402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005578804,0.00004499115,0.00012344416,0.00034646914,0.00035447246,0.0011289397,0.000047171612,0.00023155099,0.000002844273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00446281,0.0016369483,0.07643048,0.00027085922,0.00032577568,0.00018266912,0.28439787,0.005108954,0.11227334,0.2132139,0.021635305,0.28006107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016403022,0.003983005,0.51148796,0.03887073,0.00060864637,0.00068226765,0.108442806,0.0008036491,0.09269403,0.20145433,0.03832798,0.0010042829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000829306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005500329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4350575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009545051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004514403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66787523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124371828","doi":"10.29173/alr243","title":"Conceptions of Privacy: A Comment on &lt;i&gt;R. v. Kang-Brown&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;R. v. A.M.&lt;/i&gt;","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.04705594501995303,"score_gpt":0.31280550185294653,"score_spread":0.2657495568329935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124371828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05615992,0.3497717,0.00006129395,0.12915944,0.0011789819,0.00482246,0.00011114463,0.0002576974,0.45847735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334582,0.24211618,0.0003827167,0.012833126,0.00037353626,0.00024474112,0.00005118928,0.000067388864,0.010472874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951363,0.0007768058,0.001146954,0.0008658794,0.0011320682,0.00094195287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959076,0.0015281583,0.0005508109,0.0011077014,0.00031777908,0.00058797456],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013327717,0.00055245904,0.0012727582,0.00008527773,0.0013883,0.00008900363,0.0009940785,0.00025539525,0.0014451444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010756078,0.00049313233,0.0004742951,0.0007048856,0.0019227547,0.0005652541,0.0002987093,0.00029597007,0.0006389958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029952096,0.0003478642,0.00015323315,0.0010654927,0.000091998285,0.000022147258,0.0036416678,0.000002158599,0.0017348456,0.8052104,0.18341441,0.0042858236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044446596,0.00027375127,0.0008498761,0.0041756537,0.00032622353,0.000035633373,0.00003533013,0.0000073115534,0.00008179218,0.0007154699,0.99249244,0.000562051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002701526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022896547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80907804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021469948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032390174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124416878","doi":"10.1177/1365712717690752","title":"Loosening the law’s bite: Law, fact, and expert evidence in <i>R</i> v <i>JA</i> and <i>R</i> v <i>NS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Face (sociological concept); Status quo; Hearsay; Political science; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.21898713318697063,"score_gpt":0.4240047522478299,"score_spread":0.20501761906085927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124416878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47996065,0.046330947,0.00026932787,0.46011165,0.0023197217,0.00068378437,0.0000060183693,0.000026815616,0.010291088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98264,0.010235156,0.00019755658,0.005680802,0.00084859604,0.00001100123,1.0724505e-7,0.000011696857,0.00037506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714947,0.00033915884,0.0005746919,0.00025396224,0.0013484403,0.00033430217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959784,0.002203714,0.00076284324,0.00038755886,0.00052038534,0.00014706705],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051398445,0.00018281952,0.00026649798,0.00005670565,0.001362819,0.0013612433,0.0025305806,0.00007637092,0.000028854163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028460897,0.000100631194,0.0001039562,0.00007821491,0.0019863443,0.0033835815,0.00049864256,0.0005099921,0.000005344966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032489055,0.00039969207,0.07729454,0.00016440632,0.0004463595,0.0012677968,0.14083043,0.00018122586,0.038677048,0.5227394,0.02567953,0.18907064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018782349,0.00071113475,0.01628766,0.017596008,0.0002577682,0.0016245143,0.019235795,0.00028026474,0.01887596,0.063554466,0.85851085,0.001187315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014307602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011765016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022895008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124568432","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.2.157","title":"The Litmus Test of Legitimacy: Independent Adjudication and Administrative Segregation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Litmus; Legitimacy; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Test (biology); Imprisonment; Subject (documents); Computer science","score_opus":0.09757585497193504,"score_gpt":0.3395621777628097,"score_spread":0.24198632279087468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124568432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97448283,0.0038907684,0.000667939,0.012472599,0.00037810567,0.00021357728,0.00003098472,0.000015434987,0.00784773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585795,0.0018312982,0.0011118785,0.00043013963,0.00035942186,0.00001449567,0.0000057957805,0.000018956021,0.0003700778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970783,0.0006131735,0.00072314386,0.0003183855,0.00017343828,0.0010935507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937624,0.0036427754,0.00068797317,0.00024235825,0.0007590386,0.00090545235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002597752,0.00025961577,0.0004153925,0.0003308283,0.0012115358,0.00018887434,0.0005614102,0.00039566314,0.000033966106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076855076,0.00024210758,0.000098582976,0.00013390044,0.002546671,0.00039518505,0.00004110813,0.0007550001,0.0000022984161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024448324,0.000087518754,0.0066024098,0.0011153279,0.00007905809,0.0013815215,0.049911316,0.00012807485,0.0010697618,0.90587914,0.0020796026,0.031421788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013230816,0.0018738902,0.3188436,0.0007587804,0.011336491,0.0072518676,0.5415267,0.00028102906,0.0011942481,0.075637616,0.03905408,0.00091867667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07294128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41881463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8302415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006136571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005070208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98728603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124609147","doi":"","title":"Dunsmuir's Flaws Exposed: Recent Decisions on Standard of Review","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Deference; Supreme court; Standard of review; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Doctrine; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05852698514068313,"score_gpt":0.36641939578292443,"score_spread":0.3078924106422413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124609147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19041632,0.62848604,0.0038553826,0.07636498,0.0029439018,0.0011120886,0.00001670865,0.00010693239,0.09669766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56414825,0.43437734,0.0000756164,0.00030361756,0.0003652588,0.0000024930473,5.8852e-7,0.000007513874,0.0007193519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966061,0.00029650086,0.00035310315,0.00011256152,0.00078116177,0.0018505353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989528,0.00024473082,0.0002097484,0.00017033027,0.00020296252,0.00021944419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824511,0.00010505225,0.00025694107,0.000056890236,0.00046059454,0.000025077696,0.00034637164,0.000058282145,0.00046413063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011994462,0.00008318775,0.00014297436,0.00026954248,0.00011259692,0.00030862333,0.000025105433,0.0008406508,0.00008222049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012913803,0.0001095979,0.0005216708,0.000023027515,0.000042202784,0.000001551552,0.001342617,0.0000012774088,0.00007360633,0.7311482,0.008414879,0.25819227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002129384,0.0005726412,0.0001677891,0.0010506284,0.0000857197,0.000051497627,0.004682223,1.9858027e-7,0.00017731925,0.055359945,0.9374755,0.00016357124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011699053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019773762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92906064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008938089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021048456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5081905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124650751","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1242","title":"Beyond Self-Congratulations: The Charter at 25 in an International Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Cultural rights; Law; Perspective (graphical); Fundamental rights; Linguistic rights; International law; Law and economics; Right to property; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.030083288701501745,"score_gpt":0.357012665060272,"score_spread":0.3269293763587703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124650751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106939904,0.00020120821,0.00010186148,0.012408633,0.0011865044,0.00012875456,0.000003260664,0.000031868793,0.878998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673164,0.00010387664,0.00042317936,0.00052286003,0.0014454961,0.0000027522703,0.0000015486262,0.0000076162155,0.0007610265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861073,0.00015738132,0.00023720125,0.00016171572,0.0005090361,0.00032392345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917686,0.0001606555,0.00011136621,0.00012407305,0.0002736006,0.00015343749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001853622,0.00008840286,0.00009018753,0.0000659478,0.0012540154,0.00028217304,0.0004490982,0.000076554,0.0006090207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090839756,0.000066812456,0.000072142764,0.00013855609,0.00020616088,0.00093828805,0.00004268378,0.00034493586,0.000049038783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032096337,0.00008538955,0.009457379,7.021788e-7,0.000014349355,0.00004744202,0.020152157,0.000010901654,0.00008269858,0.96924096,0.0003647247,0.00051118445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012663768,0.00025370548,0.13312155,0.000119706354,0.000079388956,0.00042203176,0.08993621,0.00021007523,0.00018057239,0.47482085,0.29897594,0.00061356626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022498732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6879637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8897917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005936277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007253074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124683041","doi":"","title":"Navigating the Fine Line of Criminal Advocacy: Using Truthful Evidence to Discredit Truthful Testimony","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Harm; Law; Cross-examination; Political science; Legal ethics; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Scholarship","score_opus":0.2914187536965564,"score_gpt":0.4346985201472391,"score_spread":0.1432797664506827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124683041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945268,0.00046881166,0.0011438646,0.0025752618,0.0005714947,0.00042534363,0.000016456268,0.00009651891,0.00017547321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755627,0.00004228031,0.00042533636,0.00024416647,0.00073229795,0.0000017163806,0.000003497144,0.00003152819,0.00096287945],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651545,0.00068018894,0.0004275581,0.00047758754,0.00095396396,0.0009452612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715453,0.000929064,0.00034869715,0.00061382155,0.00034997103,0.0006039073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002080778,0.00032263075,0.00040325907,0.00014237328,0.0010690587,0.00023934117,0.0014933028,0.0001834999,0.000071898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014663774,0.00029219623,0.00019542946,0.001063129,0.0005622834,0.0033216188,0.00055379537,0.00079147203,0.000101638085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017009296,0.00011338999,0.9734273,0.00008817144,0.000029991117,0.000044623273,0.0203599,0.000116867435,0.0022057465,0.00050056196,0.000002221878,0.0029411297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067053025,0.00048426614,0.95001566,0.00481047,0.00081055536,0.000057426307,0.027834928,0.0000059491426,0.0067063514,0.00018654253,0.007328036,0.0010893093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006361785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057406225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023411667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003280982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003445181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124722718","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2347033","title":"Counting on the Court: The Preservation of Fundamental Freedoms and Liberties in the Era of the Security Revolution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Civil liberties; Politics","score_opus":0.01910575680561668,"score_gpt":0.27063227480383784,"score_spread":0.2515265179982212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124722718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97468567,0.0021641662,0.000020647696,0.020929815,0.00008078275,0.00018292888,8.641692e-7,0.0000018877408,0.0019332567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779487,0.0018672968,0.0000020859716,0.00015148881,0.00007383441,0.0000034829143,9.9597095e-8,0.0000026106425,0.00010424962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.00071215606,0.00018498387,0.000062441235,0.00044772556,0.00044398673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991766,0.00042832745,0.00020109865,0.000118972595,0.00006502122,0.000009929829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066741817,0.00005429998,0.00006979525,0.000012061929,0.0007351822,0.000049534217,0.00035233682,0.00003233098,0.000012222788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054362183,0.000022988675,0.000048855523,0.0001913086,0.0004174427,0.00019098095,0.000019378831,0.0008966008,4.6569704e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028130158,0.000035605764,0.01800986,0.0000055838345,0.000014278112,8.633719e-8,0.024365613,0.000022644175,0.00014067932,0.9566795,0.0002374261,0.00046059073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030399786,0.00024848795,0.04418696,0.00019366339,0.000056869743,0.000035683024,0.15846054,0.0001578494,0.00026829747,0.78343874,0.012548598,0.00010029871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027834985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024456616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17324075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018899563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055135484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124783219","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1012","title":"Book Review: Criminal Evidence and Human Rights: Reimagining Common Law Procedural Traditions, by Paul Roberts and Jill Hunter (eds)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.028603034759155887,"score_gpt":0.31872944199691877,"score_spread":0.2901264072377629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124783219","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012596115,0.64122367,0.00006036022,0.1284741,0.00049004174,0.0011830135,0.000021764796,0.000158164,0.21579279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94298047,0.037210498,0.00034803624,0.017017767,0.00044144542,0.000038706512,0.0000065529716,0.00002229892,0.0019342237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976386,0.00036080313,0.00052740326,0.0003606506,0.00056489714,0.00054763444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861807,0.00022694081,0.00026132292,0.00018754286,0.00020517159,0.0005009589],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080776727,0.000248829,0.0003797987,0.000036942005,0.003434364,0.00078445626,0.00035084967,0.00010088558,0.001347852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049434988,0.00019002784,0.000091659975,0.000081845894,0.00092882005,0.0031817954,0.000057869875,0.0006713086,0.000037134425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015094995,0.00007971816,0.00023649857,0.00040825666,0.000026885878,0.00005943453,0.0016654606,2.034525e-7,0.00034060268,0.2245526,0.77069443,0.0019207866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029351778,0.00021490415,0.0004810564,0.0058546686,0.00022234878,0.00079800683,0.00050423766,0.000009587153,0.0001296932,0.0428618,0.94818205,0.00044815714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099625684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09032202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93038434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008432558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004554641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124816542","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries: Examining the Regulation of Prosecutorial Discretion and Misconduct in Canada and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Political science; Dismissal; Discretion; Law; Accountability; Innocence; Tort; Jurisdiction; Wrongdoing; Economic Justice; Tort reform; Culpability; Liability","score_opus":0.01340213047541248,"score_gpt":0.2616171957947579,"score_spread":0.24821506531934542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124816542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963263,0.0007733515,0.00006438826,0.0025628163,0.0000636832,0.00015226798,9.205884e-7,0.0000010456863,0.00005520805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979059,0.0019009858,0.0000055047844,0.000020247293,0.00007058149,0.0000032974708,8.620645e-7,0.0000021630096,0.00009042058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899536,0.00021640953,0.00016978188,0.00005301398,0.00021804705,0.0003473579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940765,0.00029195182,0.00015070023,0.00004306503,0.00008621074,0.00002039956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019400308,0.000040976214,0.00008825352,0.000024771853,0.00019389055,0.000037018177,0.00008595865,0.00001510802,0.0000137284405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012015327,0.000022770344,0.00000893768,0.00012154996,0.0003360615,0.0001658128,0.00001009035,0.000242639,7.267321e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005029409,0.000023552457,0.060713015,0.000049435035,0.00009973077,7.75923e-7,0.08052495,0.0006982374,0.0015693924,0.84471077,0.00019278687,0.010914419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035438074,0.00035231697,0.05543986,0.00024950813,0.00010975582,0.000059300066,0.36120632,0.003048298,0.0004014043,0.57256323,0.002782314,0.00024388162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.961306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28068137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002679851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019843844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35202128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125352381","doi":"","title":"\"Chartering\" in the Shadow of Lochner: Guindon, Goodwin and the Criminal-Administrative Distinction at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Shadow (psychology); Psychology","score_opus":0.06865969122698284,"score_gpt":0.32342380307887975,"score_spread":0.2547641118518969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125352381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2537466,0.07741285,0.0020413585,0.5029939,0.0018218827,0.008777864,0.0053576506,0.00009346213,0.14775445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99152285,0.006577598,0.0000101856385,0.0012545483,0.000116876756,0.00009882392,0.000012032883,0.000005912205,0.00040118227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960568,0.0012632231,0.0007554976,0.00035561222,0.0011426376,0.00042624038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482995,0.0032684049,0.00041339753,0.0005701018,0.0008183059,0.000099859884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003710355,0.0002771946,0.0005166987,0.000020296022,0.001196192,0.000058970374,0.0010149162,0.00007069911,0.00040529846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017442986,0.000114823946,0.00015100304,0.00023658757,0.013455491,0.00031324496,0.00020813357,0.00025074254,0.00000661718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024234079,0.000038508275,0.00036399314,0.00020418043,0.000030520067,0.000019878877,0.0021898171,0.000005591645,0.00008502409,0.98932207,0.006969703,0.0005283565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029268826,0.0007101139,0.009877701,0.009754952,0.0014958346,0.00112492,0.03731387,0.00010537421,0.0009496567,0.026633391,0.90781426,0.0012930663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37097532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82673305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017274877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002000807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125352928","doi":"","title":"The Problem of 'Relevance': Intelligence to Evidence Lessons from UK Terrorism Prosecutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Criminal justice; Human rights; Relevance (law); Dilemma; Legislature; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04208206344052312,"score_gpt":0.2877412551848344,"score_spread":0.24565919174431128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125352928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38696575,0.0011050432,0.00827743,0.040021006,0.0031346784,0.0018029071,0.0003522258,0.00044038208,0.55790055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555741,0.0013869668,0.0014328152,0.00010844371,0.00035914432,0.0000014901078,0.000012296364,0.000016131758,0.041108612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970124,0.00038482985,0.00033611996,0.00077519694,0.0008775364,0.00061392575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967962,0.00075658556,0.00049339357,0.0010046656,0.00039519885,0.00055395334],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034255188,0.00030977966,0.00035059752,0.00031673684,0.010328277,0.0004586173,0.0033453852,0.00026017192,0.00008407786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031880173,0.00032595106,0.00031474128,0.0006607401,0.0033660592,0.0035640532,0.0010523011,0.00043808325,0.00003905585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067198125,0.00010524981,0.009945034,0.000046414476,0.00014984462,0.0008872106,0.004098666,0.0008411783,0.003139785,0.9671049,0.0057023554,0.0073073693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022738356,0.000119160395,0.005908119,0.000681445,0.00018751466,0.000010563477,0.012670878,0.000040680774,0.0059298454,0.0014948023,0.97223115,0.0004984771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011546148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025587343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9665288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076156296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002400876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125516008","doi":"10.7202/1073845ar","title":"L’indemnisation des victimes d’actes criminels au Québec : la loi exclut-elle les victimes de violences sexuelles ou conjugales ?","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04135098196270157,"score_gpt":0.290767640459992,"score_spread":0.24941665849729042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125516008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9111848,0.020446904,0.006429054,0.038572032,0.0003974294,0.00035660376,0.000057327557,0.00028767547,0.02226821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791849,0.005132143,0.00242601,0.0013954286,0.0011450115,0.000040615272,0.000014191584,0.00006514939,0.010596544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957886,0.00089842186,0.00062316546,0.0007761508,0.00065569405,0.0012579702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961569,0.0022543743,0.0003402687,0.00027512282,0.00021038418,0.0007629608],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175208,0.00054220646,0.00061113323,0.00011221504,0.0023929717,0.00043579788,0.0008641719,0.00082178105,0.0010402054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015729633,0.00059651484,0.0003468982,0.00056943594,0.005739458,0.0010014718,0.00012259062,0.0008253031,0.00024815547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026856796,0.00030494708,0.10469433,0.0012758354,0.00032155545,0.00019364477,0.46490964,0.0011189351,0.0029011967,0.12347856,0.004750199,0.2957826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088887615,0.00076345826,0.034546774,0.0014813656,0.0011085736,0.00011867774,0.31098804,0.0037004054,0.008798149,0.046966672,0.58864427,0.0019947665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21428226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11393903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5838941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021948328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002217239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125517748","doi":"10.36348/sijlcj.2020.v03i09.007","title":"Transplanting Legal Context without the Law: Double Criminality in Meng Wanzhou’s Extradition Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transplanting; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11482981634586617,"score_gpt":0.3852039120817417,"score_spread":0.27037409573587556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125517748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213897,0.0010948502,0.0005319674,0.029932704,0.0011163529,0.00015071523,0.000017290824,0.000016912889,0.04574953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994409,0.00022341876,0.0002927658,0.004145082,0.00088226644,0.00000152544,0.0000013987535,0.0000067760006,0.000037751437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838823,0.0002351688,0.00042874584,0.00014773793,0.0006134882,0.00018663074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989148,0.00027624037,0.00021410201,0.000056888603,0.00037516185,0.00016280155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016740693,0.00010164176,0.00017142971,0.00003674412,0.00050693116,0.00043260283,0.0003708763,0.00005956853,0.00007044507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021579333,0.00008003476,0.000080598635,0.00007124298,0.0003139003,0.0016308626,0.000031293108,0.0005437922,0.0000056182116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008950684,0.00007337915,0.0005689629,0.00006730861,0.00006850032,0.0032653413,0.030344428,0.000043989567,0.0008095813,0.96040803,0.00027201264,0.0031834156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009003,0.00072857254,0.003320651,0.0017567144,0.0023339903,0.014927964,0.22136007,0.0007837795,0.006126988,0.011895085,0.72664523,0.0011179467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01087051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056343223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006560537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011037625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125659810","doi":"","title":"Canadian Fundamental Justice and American Due Process: Two Models for a Guarantee of Basic Adjudicative Fairness","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Political science; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Politics; Law; Human rights; Economic Justice; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04156798825757578,"score_gpt":0.3523028877556587,"score_spread":0.3107348994980829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125659810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91114694,0.00020740832,0.003660712,0.0029873066,0.00008953403,0.0005864539,0.000039238716,0.000024297473,0.08125814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820095,0.000045845758,0.00078810897,0.00025954915,0.000025440168,0.000038676204,0.00000116628,0.0000056173008,0.0006346181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919814,0.000055150118,0.00012204866,0.00018378947,0.00015941742,0.00028144853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994323,0.0001360132,0.00006794546,0.00007258656,0.00013582419,0.00015527886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031611242,0.00007326639,0.00015118101,0.000048655096,0.00032869817,0.000028685568,0.0001228048,0.000021780093,0.00006265529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017485388,0.00006788523,0.000028082992,0.00021399598,0.0004619807,0.00023485602,0.0000063526154,0.00003868066,0.0000023815094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004521362,0.000051117142,0.0016372352,0.0001289353,0.000022377437,0.000003589803,0.040120516,0.00011177643,0.00004466579,0.9520161,0.000694762,0.0051236837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013670325,0.0005819246,0.0014488109,0.00019121754,0.0005374955,0.000014986292,0.80652887,0.00600052,0.0013552424,0.15555577,0.02555384,0.0008643066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53775126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.802641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79646033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000970755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061909034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46532688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125722114","doi":"","title":"The War on Terror: Constitutional Governance in a State of Permanent Warfare","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Legislature; Principal (computer security); Legislation; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Corporate governance; War on terror; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.024151158854916404,"score_gpt":0.2930094908237304,"score_spread":0.268858331968814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125722114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6764748,0.0030253127,0.000027203689,0.008870236,0.0008538345,0.00048150404,0.000063562635,0.000047297337,0.31015623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722517,0.00048263214,0.00006116472,0.00034956142,0.00004372381,0.0000146675575,0.0000010732716,0.0000036482904,0.0018183615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866045,0.00018304869,0.00021460564,0.00017556286,0.00047503985,0.0002912986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993892,0.00017958453,0.0000875137,0.00018449634,0.000060795162,0.00009843831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070619327,0.00008591792,0.00011698651,0.000011182704,0.0004601778,0.00003438189,0.00025201988,0.000037144488,0.0002181152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042282726,0.00006531485,0.00005497629,0.00013536954,0.0009988493,0.00017374886,0.000020989837,0.00017138004,0.00014458448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031909596,0.000044253597,0.0028740796,0.000008250041,0.0000042133292,0.000011946341,0.001068385,0.0001068775,0.000056181616,0.9935273,0.0014908416,0.000775794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026510112,0.000051654435,0.0057858974,0.00015869281,0.0000056192644,0.0000025635732,0.0012709725,0.0000063437246,0.00055325933,0.012617847,0.9791426,0.00013946713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042019784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015768941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002581489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98554516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125735005","doi":"","title":"Threading the Needle: Structural Reform & Canada’s Intelligence-to-Evidence Dilemma","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Political science; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Terrorism; Confidentiality; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05164387273702871,"score_gpt":0.313018193409592,"score_spread":0.26137432067256333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125735005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91900206,0.0003550072,0.00009367882,0.02754394,0.003363326,0.00032635775,0.000003076734,0.00003114242,0.049281392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654543,0.00008028413,0.0001298495,0.0017028024,0.0011727876,0.0000031576978,3.2460622e-7,0.000011643797,0.00035371113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774015,0.00015786265,0.0003202927,0.0002019422,0.00097197946,0.0006077607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987702,0.00027609203,0.00014474464,0.00026225782,0.00022739329,0.00031933075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00120494,0.00015221252,0.00017550003,0.000034956538,0.0022786236,0.00060795096,0.0010803704,0.00005624985,0.0006123777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021487108,0.000098429904,0.00008334068,0.00024448827,0.00019239809,0.0007391976,0.0001219841,0.00049538363,0.00018448522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012472672,0.000009632402,0.0102093555,0.000027533422,0.000043425945,0.00011747386,0.0085338345,0.00037400782,0.0001045511,0.89625895,0.006053186,0.07814334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009351602,0.00025256857,0.011374733,0.0006400803,0.00006919953,0.00039569964,0.34075582,0.00012371075,0.0005384108,0.022333972,0.62276417,0.0006581478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98193175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012558884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068305316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312586974","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2355875","title":"The Influence of Freedom of Speech on Tort Law: Where to Draw the Line?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Line (geometry); Law; Free speech; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Liability","score_opus":0.015697633133082596,"score_gpt":0.31127349222217293,"score_spread":0.29557585908909034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312586974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97674465,0.0031912846,0.00005779231,0.011824512,0.00025019073,0.00014654141,0.0000011070995,0.0000073887322,0.0077765323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540627,0.0024708314,0.000024233299,0.00011549917,0.00066476484,0.0000022867935,5.592172e-8,0.000006113769,0.0013099199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769706,0.00017465849,0.00024717939,0.000074076524,0.00055041985,0.0012565814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990344,0.00033412228,0.00016967913,0.00019438766,0.0001696938,0.00009768283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004431897,0.00007780973,0.00011727314,0.000020225014,0.0007068791,0.000042107895,0.0006611379,0.000047581496,0.000019900644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032761836,0.000042862626,0.000088806235,0.00017809511,0.00034611434,0.00021283602,0.000039989605,0.00067549717,0.000025212325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005426388,0.00002999113,0.002617222,0.0000031775096,0.000027132975,3.019871e-7,0.0030447633,0.00021584803,0.000519361,0.98721385,0.00035402493,0.005920052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053692353,0.0020090023,0.019700753,0.00037952536,0.00017729483,0.00012761752,0.058973245,0.000008128628,0.003168826,0.21472861,0.69969016,0.00049990544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065206247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05834941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77248526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025084254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009161741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125875054","doi":"","title":"Calling on U.S. Courts to Adopt Canada's Unified Approach to Statutory Interpretation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Legislative history; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Law; Legislature; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02019172881396807,"score_gpt":0.32368522083580364,"score_spread":0.30349349202183556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125875054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7929613,0.00047317878,0.016465582,0.07119099,0.000551533,0.00042489026,0.0000021215124,0.000015209211,0.117915176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951571,0.00019078385,0.00044920403,0.003792549,0.00020291442,8.344979e-7,1.7080423e-7,0.000006008082,0.00020043124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870515,0.00030858812,0.00021346145,0.00008748597,0.00050714496,0.00017817334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821156,0.00089495524,0.0002494728,0.00007826091,0.00035847322,0.00020729192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031346998,0.000075829805,0.00012533269,0.000043463562,0.00031327255,0.00009679585,0.00024360635,0.000031386888,0.0000054121547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013504074,0.000052238214,0.000015277012,0.00014229253,0.00004036043,0.00032855116,0.000019055813,0.00023366143,0.000005575724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012780074,0.0004354297,0.00031086997,0.00053103984,0.00023437741,0.00004369,0.54512393,0.11631514,0.00078268186,0.030630602,0.03333609,0.25947607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029417846,0.0007224729,0.00039992566,0.0003969004,0.0002452387,0.0000744492,0.07727876,0.0011987109,0.0005635911,0.0016022319,0.91691774,0.00030578594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055793278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034939513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88358164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007045555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046783825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125890649","doi":"","title":"Seeking Justice by Plea: The Prosecutor's Ethical Obligations During Plea Bargaining","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Negotiation; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminal justice; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Obligation; Bargaining power; Sociology","score_opus":0.027514980794915444,"score_gpt":0.34808984295665424,"score_spread":0.3205748621617388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125890649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8273106,0.0029793358,0.0033077477,0.12839834,0.0010952061,0.00038060473,0.0000046746263,0.000119763026,0.036403682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932164,0.0020633428,0.000040752428,0.0002821013,0.0012786803,0.0000075393077,7.108877e-7,0.000014984194,0.003095477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996687,0.00026295191,0.0002393585,0.00020029773,0.00060770987,0.0020026823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989092,0.00025743668,0.00028483488,0.00027438294,0.0001354374,0.00013870434],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004934902,0.00012272211,0.00013624155,0.000032832242,0.011586162,0.00087266497,0.0010264869,0.00017036588,0.00004242197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019101966,0.00009432464,0.00010184364,0.00009067714,0.00044200406,0.0005502036,0.00009969312,0.0037582768,0.000037626654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003056681,0.00002137997,0.0024086253,0.000009436057,0.000056351997,0.000007450142,0.008361771,0.000014382806,0.001347488,0.98374933,0.00086976046,0.0031234843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012455831,0.00029874413,0.012486206,0.0003551805,0.0005598475,0.00050089735,0.13132888,0.00034932978,0.0003386046,0.73471254,0.116933644,0.0008905367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016508676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010262891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24903677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007026518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020254683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125891016","doi":"","title":"Search and Seizure in 2004 - Dialogue or Dead-End?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Discretion; Supreme court; Law; Suspect; Political science; Constitution; Power (physics); Judicial review; Prerogative; Judicial discretion; Politics","score_opus":0.04029662111072017,"score_gpt":0.326380885851404,"score_spread":0.2860842647406838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125891016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93986475,0.0018068566,0.00002703827,0.015725762,0.00020632397,0.00032127814,0.000014465207,0.000096026,0.0419375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98983055,0.00032966238,0.00066429994,0.001128829,0.00063785765,0.000014976356,0.0000034587913,0.000011335834,0.007379009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984051,0.00019681455,0.00019587974,0.00030064114,0.0003963056,0.0005052721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999237,0.00019845145,0.000025072584,0.00018332768,0.00005153973,0.00030461917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000924138,0.000117620744,0.00017496679,0.000050004208,0.00042155327,0.00017255386,0.00026974204,0.00013254108,0.0012640271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026587432,0.000103068596,0.00003745262,0.0002771915,0.00036445085,0.00058247946,0.00007524228,0.00030302705,0.00048003413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004739556,0.00041556003,0.078276135,0.00016294855,0.000039085076,0.00045192288,0.02844146,0.00032688637,0.00090210844,0.7861424,0.03719427,0.06717325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005284768,0.00008149651,0.010797009,0.000112566784,0.000014187105,0.000011311325,0.0029525878,0.0000444128,0.00035171487,0.002070171,0.98271847,0.00031760902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051858753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39859393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014666538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024813256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125934396","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Sentencing Regime for Murder","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Compromise; Flexibility (engineering); Position (finance); Homicide; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Economics; Human factors and ergonomics; Management","score_opus":0.05356430709796579,"score_gpt":0.32074137411145476,"score_spread":0.267177067013489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125934396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5445078,0.0021561857,0.003093645,0.13522954,0.0025398403,0.0015871607,0.000009010107,0.0005358285,0.310341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805474,0.0001486455,0.0010666696,0.0036074242,0.0012620842,0.000042614454,0.0000020781354,0.000016115086,0.013306927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985299,0.00014272792,0.00018936412,0.00025867665,0.00040361276,0.00047571587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886316,0.0004700847,0.00008155866,0.00029869212,0.00013670551,0.00014977335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015545593,0.0001086902,0.00013243931,0.00001847211,0.0018029184,0.00023796133,0.00046513678,0.00009603596,0.00035698907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069026474,0.00008206319,0.00011823295,0.00020488059,0.00029096357,0.0003930062,0.00005592761,0.00022042295,0.00018335231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007308571,0.000035223624,0.0028182268,0.000029095932,0.000027603242,0.0000276575,0.018093908,0.000035378074,0.00048981403,0.9344053,0.03774583,0.006218841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015037952,0.00002598484,0.00030019367,0.00007588594,0.000026876343,0.000007088661,0.0059447633,0.00004724604,0.00010857988,0.05149338,0.94166857,0.00015104175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022713969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046747867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90392274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009933895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011631801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126026167","doi":"10.29173/alr169","title":"The Administration of Justice? Certificate Proceedings, Charkaoui II, and the Value of Disclosure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Agency (philosophy); Certificate; Terrorism; Public administration; Economic Justice; Administration (probate law); National security; Political science; United States National Security Agency; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Law; Public relations; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04608611807496349,"score_gpt":0.34024097622189636,"score_spread":0.2941548581469329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126026167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28444117,0.08590425,0.0000024188457,0.3357724,0.0008509971,0.002750068,0.0000082608885,0.00002290208,0.29024753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96172935,0.036753565,0.000018605937,0.000255098,0.00007863113,0.00002636634,7.211697e-7,0.0000038266126,0.0011338568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991504,0.000070650334,0.0002998729,0.00011890363,0.00023106343,0.00012909321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875605,0.0006685721,0.00023690122,0.00016327568,0.00012883663,0.000046390996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016243727,0.00007018654,0.00020113458,0.0000037716738,0.0006423367,0.000037184887,0.00030313927,0.00004004627,0.000041806627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00122411,0.000034537086,0.000070236136,0.00012283008,0.0011779414,0.00013219487,0.0000429947,0.00011452012,0.0000037721998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026075442,0.000013377942,0.00006758004,0.00073148846,0.000007535103,6.7315916e-8,0.0011937458,7.948089e-9,0.00015667861,0.9944845,0.0011423011,0.0021766394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001039755,0.00004610221,0.00057380093,0.0009830141,0.00040306433,0.0000043349446,0.00039380437,0.000007686205,0.00039329485,0.0039604814,0.99305105,0.00007940393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045087547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017896138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034490065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059221453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126101507","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0041","title":"Comparative Criminal Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Principle of legality; Comparative law; Section (typography); Political science; Criminal procedure; Parochialism; Public law; Context (archaeology); Criminal jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Geography; Business","score_opus":0.13926402087759937,"score_gpt":0.39691443517097774,"score_spread":0.25765041429337837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126101507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001309596,0.0024894166,0.000061359286,0.0009585057,0.0011433183,0.00020532048,0.000039995157,0.00012151479,0.9948496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05736313,0.006461298,0.00041671345,0.0004968932,0.002523742,0.00002159484,0.0001400681,0.00001554728,0.93256104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794286,0.00019280883,0.00026352942,0.00037555033,0.00074049237,0.0004847315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990827,0.0002491055,0.00012685466,0.00020919944,0.00017421875,0.00015793629],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028110368,0.00024055825,0.00047678623,0.00005355624,0.0007111494,0.00021624572,0.0004916918,0.00037302397,0.0025500401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000262773,0.00020825617,0.00015842865,0.0001364697,0.000706278,0.0001943766,0.00006875096,0.00041414567,0.0008834586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051309717,0.00002734569,0.000005600813,0.000046484758,0.000008846796,0.000008865275,0.0016091425,3.4041673e-7,5.2639464e-8,0.33856317,0.658242,0.001483042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004875892,0.00003075884,0.000039226696,0.00019889131,0.00010631297,0.0000012673758,0.0036422703,0.000001126909,0.000008093607,0.0032272656,0.99240965,0.000286389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121743895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13774303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3353359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001934866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005085143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126114360","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1074","title":"Police Independence and the Military Police","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Parliament; Charter; Political science; Military justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal code; Criminal law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05197959954786438,"score_gpt":0.3026798840666218,"score_spread":0.25070028451875737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126114360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039072793,0.001316997,0.00008397331,0.0040268814,0.00036583364,0.00013253803,0.0000025507873,0.000034233522,0.9549642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958364,0.0011780321,0.0005614587,0.001171296,0.00055002136,0.0000035811954,1.4232339e-7,0.0000087978,0.0006902901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983027,0.00038638173,0.00022677411,0.00016070332,0.000513749,0.00040969875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991061,0.00021848225,0.00009066566,0.00017477346,0.00013015667,0.0002798133],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001965986,0.000113583985,0.00015864024,0.00003000833,0.0019317644,0.00010505123,0.00053828646,0.00009812159,0.00037194375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007106289,0.00007620794,0.000087712106,0.00011113782,0.0012256206,0.0005727949,0.00008961804,0.00045313672,0.000057609566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011104657,0.00002518675,0.00077471527,0.000005401431,0.000017044315,0.0000095768655,0.07246446,6.7228285e-7,0.00001683189,0.9243233,0.00067667314,0.001575097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034969414,0.0003362162,0.022483125,0.00035204666,0.00035909805,0.0019076274,0.13898554,0.0000791025,0.00035289887,0.7123423,0.11821962,0.0010854696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92445236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86764956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95676357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004416539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099456796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126805376","doi":"","title":"A Study on the Canadian Criminal Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Journal of Comparative Criminal Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Political science; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17513455031260405,"score_gpt":0.39294682322198965,"score_spread":0.2178122729093856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126805376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7101808,0.00012237027,0.00003941912,0.010986939,0.00042239277,0.00034828356,0.000006274903,0.000013662647,0.27787983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968446,0.000006606007,0.0001608937,0.0022174087,0.0006009542,0.0000070401784,7.627687e-7,0.000012861164,0.00014886448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682224,0.0006537157,0.0005645436,0.00022638771,0.0011466056,0.00058650365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975889,0.00045069098,0.00035062942,0.00026881573,0.00070890016,0.0006321032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020061494,0.0002538236,0.00045191296,0.0001304835,0.0024573202,0.00038754538,0.0009246006,0.00007238063,0.0001830941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001212538,0.0001718843,0.000220254,0.00025669168,0.0014774487,0.00047959393,0.000035022098,0.0006780954,0.00013487233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017056697,0.00027031894,0.000108502645,0.00000493618,0.00005275417,0.00039555575,0.10095348,0.0000948578,0.000021271731,0.89656335,0.0013031096,0.00006130517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002139712,0.0070913886,0.0101063335,0.0006219046,0.0011021133,0.00040392549,0.66239953,0.000003308745,0.0026933698,0.08427486,0.22826876,0.0008947719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28069153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86208236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81228846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063658605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011470736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128056352","doi":"","title":"Foundations of Criminal and Civil Law in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Criminology; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.03902490765349789,"score_gpt":0.30102886521849276,"score_spread":0.26200395756499484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128056352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074700767,0.00020253289,0.0000013168213,0.0006486856,0.000075310956,0.00007929238,0.000010889413,0.00000461118,0.99823034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19203593,0.0003873014,0.00004713425,0.00027859304,0.000085509666,0.0000029781008,0.000008529481,0.000005442687,0.8071486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992812,0.000029009123,0.00016118976,0.00012537565,0.0002644011,0.00013879917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996195,0.00016031504,0.0000443161,0.00007949895,0.00003389479,0.000062514555],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013627239,0.000069698144,0.00015374168,0.00002936501,0.000115152194,0.000019710462,0.000121609024,0.00006656916,0.0027180167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020108568,0.000070267895,0.000019413868,0.000036533613,0.0002571516,0.000077184144,0.000016610255,0.00009735704,0.000006452041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056346707,0.000006077228,0.000106038555,0.00006178099,0.0000044265107,0.000011901423,0.0018285923,0.0000016480635,3.879259e-7,0.9273622,0.067691535,0.0029197647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003281082,0.000008533713,0.00022806428,0.000099529316,0.000023349296,7.2615546e-7,0.0011322337,0.0000013878067,0.0000011663675,0.011030056,0.9873477,0.00009439476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040636736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056447876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128715866","doi":"","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms = Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis Butterworths eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Law","score_opus":0.019654060815114675,"score_gpt":0.2687384684076379,"score_spread":0.2490844075925232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128715866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023345556,0.0006103893,0.000005555872,0.0023411966,0.00046732332,0.0006073605,0.00023898554,0.000080108,0.9723035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17874391,0.00007895385,0.00017908243,0.0013271032,0.00093861175,0.000035702808,0.000050064522,0.000067012916,0.81857955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967884,0.0001592027,0.00059541466,0.0007043674,0.0005010101,0.0012516144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749196,0.0001797001,0.00031715172,0.00053423597,0.00023561988,0.0012413331],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073849683,0.00052602834,0.0007433222,0.0004132321,0.00080487033,0.00017303466,0.0006347094,0.00064258,0.0006141329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037776255,0.0005362267,0.00021293556,0.00006538865,0.0015197386,0.00026006092,0.00009036481,0.0005877223,0.0000934842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065712375,0.000040622996,0.00049089704,0.00036658932,0.00030273694,0.00045026417,0.09542762,0.0000016641347,0.0000462238,0.7693535,0.087138966,0.046315182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019792172,0.000093897615,0.00038645507,0.00065674813,0.000111881884,0.000019861915,0.00015753861,0.000003128665,0.000030481233,0.06369494,0.93405026,0.0005968988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8868633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99757177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8469113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009519841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001967152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130270817","doi":"10.29173/mlj1013","title":"An Analysis of Third Party Record Applications Under the Mills Scheme, 2012-2017: The Right to Full Answer and Defence versus Rights to Privacy and Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); The Right to Privacy; Right to privacy; Plaintiff; Deliberation; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.06267139408840833,"score_gpt":0.3646206850977449,"score_spread":0.3019492910093366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130270817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811765,0.00017189702,0.00411598,0.0080889035,0.00025661336,0.00033015996,0.000014523281,0.000014572482,0.0058308793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740803,0.000075522636,0.0012323342,0.0006625783,0.00054624066,0.000015497304,8.205685e-7,0.000004356704,0.000054629567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984143,0.0003348488,0.00028787603,0.0002476959,0.0004238707,0.00029145868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984413,0.00038862572,0.00015634666,0.0004142901,0.000303699,0.0002957731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001726648,0.00011440302,0.00019309725,0.00006435204,0.0027362525,0.0003168792,0.00061176956,0.000058658305,0.00014800996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060387898,0.00006423982,0.00007271383,0.00053368235,0.0007706543,0.0003818083,0.00010828444,0.00017515861,0.000025112582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010300134,0.00032510128,0.015537925,0.000028757317,0.0009189724,0.000008357882,0.037584525,0.000055466793,0.002034478,0.9051813,0.013596606,0.023698526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027815197,0.0004230536,0.042293236,0.00003535356,0.0008543719,0.000012368423,0.025304535,0.00010249641,0.0002973129,0.020402173,0.9096907,0.00030627553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02875969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7034956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005871358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046341018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132978165","doi":"","title":"Collaboration with Justice in the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Canada: A comparative study on the provision of undertakings to offenders who are willing to give evidence in the prosecution of others","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Order (exchange); Law; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.17927932165641292,"score_gpt":0.39807744608146367,"score_spread":0.21879812442505076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132978165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99238986,0.0004160998,0.000058821588,0.003164266,0.00008557337,0.0022403877,0.00011302806,0.0000044654685,0.0015275257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990479,0.00046627223,0.000020194468,0.0002295507,0.000109391935,0.00005515592,0.000028784454,0.000008847787,0.000033941342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970192,0.00094910676,0.00034496977,0.00044790716,0.000994355,0.0002445031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965138,0.0019972501,0.00058480864,0.00070257776,0.00015185545,0.000049711893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042724726,0.00020187376,0.00038888,0.00007266627,0.00064755714,0.00022817394,0.0014051426,0.00005238679,5.4833646e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023358875,0.00010357575,0.000013102592,0.0003638448,0.00020332799,0.00030323816,0.00019288775,0.00029836196,1.07540416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066420896,0.00012080965,0.06541372,0.0008716272,0.00007360042,0.000024946847,0.92602926,0.0023069344,0.00002412585,0.00021029898,0.0029850176,0.0012754751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001576416,0.0004337657,0.29207057,0.009380171,0.0002006766,0.000003326453,0.692106,0.0019144363,0.0000022852314,0.000052875734,0.0034640292,0.00021419238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7442343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99087906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24664474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097865704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084642705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49805516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134350734","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1416","title":"Ending the Erasure?: Writing Race into the Story of Psychological Detentions – Examining R. v. Le","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Construct (python library); Race (biology); Supreme court; Law enforcement; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Ethnic group; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.14484145803454884,"score_gpt":0.4063267709386004,"score_spread":0.2614853129040516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134350734","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054509785,0.6758438,0.0005559938,0.12316502,0.00095418957,0.00095495227,0.0000047712874,0.00011381729,0.14389773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95313925,0.043997377,0.0003670454,0.001761906,0.00016750037,0.000031601976,0.0000017814066,0.00000720977,0.0005263133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725705,0.0015298054,0.00031347145,0.00022855877,0.00042608645,0.00024502692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811345,0.0010964104,0.00014039701,0.00037284003,0.00021992375,0.000056962217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054541393,0.00009342336,0.00024674108,0.0000077846325,0.0017404461,0.0000659258,0.00047103697,0.00004932646,0.0002920494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015613176,0.000057469708,0.00015475751,0.00031143308,0.00056115363,0.00017026275,0.00010101405,0.00032246704,0.000025707137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004119083,0.00009106844,0.00079826376,0.0007933079,0.000039005306,0.000020614,0.0065451977,0.0000036256533,0.0019346027,0.91994846,0.009479172,0.060342558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054218704,0.000022365788,0.00081823533,0.002555989,0.000106506275,0.00001131299,0.0074793827,0.0000024980384,0.000077523524,0.0012966811,0.9874677,0.00010758065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000709409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027414272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97798854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038055456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012878816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134415273","doi":"","title":"Entrapment Minimalism: Shedding the 'No Reasonable Suspicion or Bona Fide Inquiry' Test","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Misconduct; Commit; Reasonable suspicion; Law; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Political science; Criminology; Commission; Warrant; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07210370149154356,"score_gpt":0.37605115872123984,"score_spread":0.3039474572296963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134415273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42967442,0.000242619,0.00022968398,0.051585622,0.0020672088,0.0006593915,0.000004159782,0.0002688595,0.515268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94195074,0.00012381065,0.0006001778,0.0013010495,0.0015854124,0.000015858363,0.0000010422716,0.0000071991212,0.054414727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986812,0.00008602101,0.0001704436,0.00022275845,0.00041333956,0.00042622277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988554,0.0006198813,0.000053229636,0.00020273413,0.00015345303,0.00011529383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009816565,0.00009637748,0.000102542144,0.000021067272,0.0010485322,0.00017304694,0.0003673122,0.000060716306,0.0052216076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011218251,0.000055998105,0.00004731238,0.00021726827,0.00056893856,0.00027057558,0.00007910317,0.00007590484,0.0009448698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018977253,0.00019194852,0.011708434,0.000031297677,0.000023443896,0.00003074837,0.06003991,0.0000010849583,0.0023316867,0.17386365,0.74094576,0.010642262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009257272,0.00019895892,0.0023152013,0.00005268404,0.000018674027,0.0000031550744,0.016312392,0.000057892525,0.0010516313,0.00064046314,0.97911865,0.00013774195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006811961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008740124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5122763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095857235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015508868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135497003","doi":"10.29173/mlj1001","title":"Voluntary Intoxication and the Charter: Revisiting the Constitutionality of Section 33.1 of the Criminal Code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Charter; Mens rea; Political science; Jurisdiction; Criminal code; Legislation; Section (typography); Prerogative; Criminal law; Politics; Business","score_opus":0.0529956871023922,"score_gpt":0.3291084618731677,"score_spread":0.2761127747707755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135497003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594322,0.00025209915,0.00016004934,0.026246276,0.00068032753,0.0001640135,0.000008622244,0.000004039365,0.013052405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985579,0.0001709225,0.00003007414,0.00016031964,0.0010599828,0.000001993716,2.0741753e-7,0.0000017664505,0.000016808204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889404,0.00035745127,0.0002293043,0.0000697803,0.0003457477,0.00010367095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885786,0.00021253328,0.0004890021,0.00022299048,0.0001878722,0.000029751262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027518782,0.000050425115,0.0001019349,0.00000790047,0.004502296,0.00017338994,0.0004659878,0.00003207122,0.00002376908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043324073,0.000024638235,0.00007998501,0.000030120613,0.0029111584,0.00027710776,0.000078767785,0.00021727278,9.793735e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011559942,0.000015951968,0.030884238,0.00004793938,0.000032278942,0.0000013628556,0.006744498,0.000006793121,0.00045711428,0.93992776,0.0003175524,0.021448929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011373922,0.0000627147,0.7417151,0.00074323843,0.00049969566,0.00033169775,0.104142584,0.00020787114,0.0015289102,0.05286257,0.09655892,0.00020934416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041710693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09672422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004015742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007323418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137533241","doi":"","title":"Enjoy the Silence: Pseudolaw at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Silence; Political science; Cornerstone; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01988925066666814,"score_gpt":0.26936745252033734,"score_spread":0.2494782018536692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137533241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57162315,0.0072001466,0.00018835817,0.40772384,0.000410409,0.00021428725,0.00000696128,0.0000140034645,0.012618876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925192,0.002577688,0.0000030640283,0.0013139349,0.00050598517,0.0000018161327,3.215766e-7,0.000006181538,0.0030717966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973699,0.00023924882,0.00020296969,0.00011256553,0.00075573195,0.0013196085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922794,0.00025409242,0.00014448442,0.00012452682,0.00012897009,0.00011998969],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023202084,0.00008191953,0.00011429993,0.0000071296154,0.0013260802,0.00006656441,0.0007783178,0.000035327677,0.00027968414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040868903,0.00004565925,0.00008018607,0.00019438672,0.00028803112,0.00016413795,0.000061255414,0.0009531044,0.000010528582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002346903,0.000036130306,0.006222589,0.000020918958,0.00021051452,0.000017383567,0.03412944,0.0002651227,0.0017906536,0.8296099,0.11765157,0.009811096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037942,0.00036401668,0.0013606407,0.000045912548,0.00014172931,0.00017461542,0.2306726,0.00011814124,0.00088612596,0.07768447,0.6878457,0.00032662178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41357026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9465278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7519254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008782322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010225654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138576700","doi":"10.29173/alr2650","title":"Private Records, Sexual Activity Evidence, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Legislation; Notice; Possession (linguistics); Right to counsel; Charter; Constitution; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.04353705924492598,"score_gpt":0.3305260008523696,"score_spread":0.28698894160744365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138576700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47662732,0.38980618,0.000014459787,0.077845685,0.00037784057,0.0011278706,0.000004450343,0.000020613505,0.0541756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8895199,0.10605348,0.00005654149,0.0013129256,0.00009819139,0.000020925143,7.1070343e-7,0.0000047832523,0.0029325506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987053,0.00050061,0.00019201246,0.00022688005,0.00021081566,0.00016432663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979609,0.0015182004,0.00010998272,0.00025836966,0.00007465286,0.0000778582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010320421,0.00009214397,0.0003401701,0.0000057671527,0.00031086736,0.000049806717,0.0001493569,0.00004145541,0.00020957325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006709802,0.00005652355,0.000050070168,0.00015027403,0.0009195976,0.00033840677,0.000091780385,0.00009365447,0.00001409362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002969014,0.000033668446,0.00083728915,0.0014539675,0.000035180245,0.0000058685546,0.0020556687,1.400522e-8,0.000074368574,0.97495955,0.0033411155,0.01717364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018816133,0.000033187778,0.0009795765,0.0038137222,0.00018986675,0.000014531719,0.00006269937,0.0000035197254,0.00010571348,0.0060136165,0.98846114,0.00013426694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07092594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10252171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009303368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046610105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93526083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139652525","doi":"10.29173/mlj993","title":"Jackpot: The Hang-up Holding Back the Residual Category of Abuse of Process","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Misconduct; Redress; Law; Substantive due process; Political science; Due process; Criminology; Sociology; Common law","score_opus":0.08971413420176451,"score_gpt":0.35842435941035067,"score_spread":0.2687102252085862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139652525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93765175,0.00038519793,0.00001360591,0.0063912896,0.00098955,0.00015213403,0.000003324769,0.000006343808,0.054406803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985391,0.00022342362,0.000023505896,0.00012440563,0.00083479204,0.0000021973985,1.4528239e-7,0.000007616719,0.00024480032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985353,0.00018946492,0.00029392354,0.00010184192,0.00061187433,0.00026760658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839795,0.0002022914,0.0005722866,0.0003623259,0.00039380044,0.00007132706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018814182,0.000087752116,0.00015558927,0.000019061143,0.0035866946,0.00036198224,0.0014850396,0.00005655194,0.000106093874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038650108,0.000048080212,0.00009562804,0.000059412996,0.0014282947,0.00047361155,0.000069951486,0.0002988825,0.000021908409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051784405,0.00036279007,0.0383168,0.0003866287,0.00029597257,0.00008452918,0.25711724,0.00014332033,0.002068123,0.6023557,0.061569862,0.03678115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010010423,0.00025372815,0.055814568,0.00083385967,0.00031693955,0.0001557128,0.620262,0.000030677344,0.01348323,0.05558816,0.25174984,0.0005102413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037213042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18717994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5467676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033418353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011806296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140234991","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198843566.003.0018","title":"The Crown Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Medicine; Archaeology; Orthodontics","score_opus":0.04999217319125858,"score_gpt":0.31826803621067995,"score_spread":0.26827586301942136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140234991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023822158,0.00060382986,0.000009242818,0.0125346165,0.0007036924,0.00013949815,0.000002013336,0.000039386367,0.9859653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002307915,0.0015053959,0.000015937598,0.0003751004,0.00045148144,0.0000011040303,9.69455e-7,0.000010156889,0.99533194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991785,0.000013023351,0.000105222556,0.00014272027,0.0003793025,0.00018117779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.00031691778,0.00005813428,0.00022021154,0.000074975935,0.0000560152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044412192,0.00009110186,0.000104812374,0.000010916708,0.0005974551,0.00013981089,0.00037474956,0.00015822942,0.0038920343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046933335,0.000056043864,0.00009330176,0.0000073261594,0.0003567766,0.000055780263,0.00004755065,0.00015873145,0.0042537595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002962643,5.4617186e-7,0.0000021534686,0.0000022653,0.0000050420854,0.0000014466727,0.00021679825,4.7571902e-8,2.2966428e-7,0.81606233,0.17942466,0.0042815455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012552039,0.00000954687,0.000007777052,0.000028612687,0.000014458541,3.532316e-7,0.00023181959,4.452822e-7,6.551395e-7,0.032558993,0.96704155,0.000093226074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001256467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102438545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7876169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051202016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026966736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142525426","doi":"","title":"Mr Big: the covert technique that solved the Morcombe case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10877627757390419,"score_gpt":0.33095847412681423,"score_spread":0.22218219655291005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142525426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105951205,0.000050579212,0.0008308995,0.013830076,0.00020611747,0.0010231868,0.000035430436,0.00016226085,0.87791026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146432,0.00021796719,0.00008163496,0.00014052817,0.00014348431,6.1130373e-7,0.0000049785394,0.00001173043,0.08475584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963949,0.0010869146,0.00010850381,0.00046226688,0.00108837,0.0008590707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973186,0.0011496822,0.00009822579,0.0006720497,0.00039056424,0.00037086915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031467765,0.00018412904,0.00020442088,0.00036476942,0.005616313,0.0001741768,0.0016895764,0.0002054629,0.00022382573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029846618,0.0001452788,0.00020620137,0.0016298086,0.0024635736,0.00062141544,0.00069744297,0.00085237995,0.00007141661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002009053,0.00011066865,0.0025451425,0.000020884598,0.0000597234,0.006645936,0.004771572,0.0000070496003,0.0002902283,0.89904684,0.08455098,0.0017500871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028709357,0.00009304366,0.0003360161,0.000028535376,0.00005318707,0.00007669696,0.08505602,0.000026360265,0.00023844256,0.0011141069,0.9124872,0.00020330779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029655509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047240578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8979327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027882316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006079805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99567825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148716808","doi":"","title":"Sentencing Acts: Appraisal of court records in Canada and Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029838335325457557,"score_gpt":0.260922209767163,"score_spread":0.23108387444170547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148716808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7067685,0.0006713678,0.00006916433,0.011166283,0.0011234541,0.00064338115,0.00020205851,0.00009842616,0.27925736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151251,0.00057605066,0.0003714966,0.000012850191,0.000016745558,1.0925557e-7,0.0000045145666,0.000009650687,0.08388354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990222,0.000019668803,0.0001585332,0.0002976374,0.0002694917,0.00023248023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914265,0.00012793022,0.00028638038,0.00026746426,0.00011087952,0.00006472547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017138079,0.00014512172,0.00045497454,0.00032844552,0.00009642548,0.0000037431669,0.00054172694,0.0005009705,0.0003007013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008870742,0.00018610936,0.00005370579,0.00008903572,0.00083884853,0.00013178428,0.00023094879,0.00037863237,0.0000064183737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019821379,0.000050335566,0.19661252,0.0008114186,0.00028185002,0.00059268164,0.0054736347,0.000020376496,0.0003756419,0.75627536,0.021379376,0.017928625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007533747,0.00015876083,0.012314987,0.0019867104,0.00028580427,0.000017087154,0.038981255,0.000033523764,0.00016004196,0.0077355965,0.9367639,0.00080900476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9705234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9153845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026626734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008808215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75893193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148845190","doi":"","title":"Comparing \"Appels\" and Oranges: Evaluating the Link between Appeal Processes and Judiciary Structures in Canada and France","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Nothing; Simple (philosophy); Law; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10820533125378311,"score_gpt":0.37221740506654694,"score_spread":0.2640120738127638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148845190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97574633,0.0154816145,0.000015519912,0.0072587375,0.00004170499,0.00013752883,8.128224e-7,0.0000027519302,0.0013150172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257237,0.006817162,0.00011524856,0.00023965142,0.00023864178,7.7108825e-7,8.329149e-8,0.0000056071153,0.000010496755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987302,0.0002975132,0.00027833658,0.000112147114,0.00038188387,0.00019991961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977377,0.0014698892,0.00042146863,0.000059728594,0.00021531568,0.000095877316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030661803,0.00010418853,0.00021084181,0.000029474571,0.0005573696,0.00010126947,0.00019180098,0.000043497883,0.0000054145326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078859413,0.000060928833,0.0000070415936,0.00017329247,0.00031325943,0.00066345435,0.000057637353,0.00041754087,1.6262416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009551994,0.000014703828,0.57386327,0.0008549717,0.00010825449,0.00003799396,0.25121006,0.00007045249,0.0000643364,0.00038250096,0.0000648251,0.17237344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015697518,0.00078452186,0.58518445,0.0017233074,0.001236872,0.000725854,0.345518,0.0005527862,0.0004339303,0.053110287,0.008461209,0.0006990185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47202134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42539006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17167443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019866167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006588176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58509505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149021583","doi":"","title":"L’intoxication en contexte suicidaire et les deux sens de l’acte volontaire en droit criminel canadien: une critique de l’arrêt R. c. Turcotte","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Appeal; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01967242660546481,"score_gpt":0.3015155236801193,"score_spread":0.2818430970746545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149021583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90217143,0.0021391422,0.009379265,0.07100111,0.0006411568,0.00038878212,0.00009493472,0.00016493692,0.014019225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95994604,0.00123638,0.0016903809,0.0042344653,0.001583791,0.000049079623,0.000029066325,0.000074862925,0.03115593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951688,0.001318903,0.00054684066,0.00074437034,0.00048688287,0.0017342177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968009,0.0011977875,0.0002554296,0.0005317872,0.00035297536,0.00086111046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029224902,0.00046130695,0.0005196344,0.00013910289,0.0015233353,0.00022387021,0.00085237616,0.0012471409,0.00025119598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018736561,0.0005790325,0.00026421994,0.00051202014,0.0027181276,0.00062726653,0.000085829,0.0012485349,0.00013629386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017676583,0.00017068798,0.013287402,0.00034766863,0.0001607033,0.00051555136,0.21962571,0.00006777584,0.0064920583,0.69753593,0.012682392,0.048937336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015989444,0.0013454637,0.18052885,0.0019648822,0.0014594038,0.001354271,0.15204182,0.0038420968,0.013868726,0.18781354,0.4510051,0.003176932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39976224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6944581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5097224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051192525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012207733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150041875","doi":"10.7220/2029-4239.22.3","title":"Kai kurie vagystės kriminalizavimo probleminiai aspektai Lietuvos ir kitų užsienio šalių baudžiamuosiuose įstatymuose","year":2020,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Legislator; Lithuanian; Criminal law; Criminal code; Political science; Law; Legislation","score_opus":0.08537116852398068,"score_gpt":0.3477368655277646,"score_spread":0.2623656970037839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150041875","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018455324,0.5677961,0.0001380786,0.22442642,0.0021130007,0.0060228975,0.00023243146,0.0006657865,0.19675975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2707323,0.5981793,0.0015166836,0.11448001,0.0039961506,0.0004910898,0.0001401509,0.00027884258,0.010185489],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902994,0.0015435913,0.0021833202,0.001932028,0.0020660206,0.0019756176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467397,0.0005699283,0.001026872,0.0012660169,0.00056777184,0.0018954293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026792588,0.0011337168,0.002373023,0.000053516065,0.001374532,0.0006044075,0.0022702022,0.0005034403,0.008589161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012126778,0.0010606854,0.001080781,0.0019309948,0.0013666594,0.0012793319,0.0006827008,0.0011500516,0.010100771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018054014,0.0007263684,0.00021978367,0.055301305,0.0003388049,0.0010626818,0.017117029,0.000006910112,0.00041861463,0.3947447,0.48524785,0.04463542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042851604,0.00056479964,0.00005074898,0.016626878,0.001662509,0.00004660994,0.0006087377,0.000026369189,0.00019795491,0.001031889,0.97746485,0.001290136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042669177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014245593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.492217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030211834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088557723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151050510","doi":"","title":"Criminal law and the Canadian criminal code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Criminal law; Law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04248858460950564,"score_gpt":0.2998926238185834,"score_spread":0.25740403920907773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151050510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030903088,0.00031373484,8.3809925e-7,0.016393123,0.00042798423,0.00031027364,0.000086712585,0.000013687916,0.95155054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853317,0.0005753988,0.0001388799,0.0021760755,0.0004166253,0.00002104885,0.000003591303,0.000016459691,0.011320217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981608,0.00014179654,0.0002623151,0.0002808302,0.00039905528,0.00075525034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763155,0.00018704381,0.00015843075,0.0005828167,0.00014864761,0.0012914863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010903587,0.00017024002,0.00027989838,0.00019384833,0.004778376,0.00041912834,0.0009481826,0.00015248379,0.00019933825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005863316,0.00014427702,0.00008891881,0.000067905465,0.0032546239,0.0003625406,0.000051589996,0.00022537053,0.000029322395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024085488,0.0000031466273,0.0019140568,0.000024176601,0.000011481662,0.000057994846,0.008050532,3.5900084e-7,8.280079e-7,0.9790512,0.00751149,0.0033506902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031088895,0.00002359209,0.018370785,0.000046179655,0.00012320372,0.000009438491,0.0020988367,0.00000425584,0.000005681095,0.006377471,0.97242826,0.00020142198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99960274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025518372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002755513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152564363","doi":"","title":"WCS Canada Comments - Ontario’s Sustainable Bait Management Strategy - November 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.01534385728168926,"score_gpt":0.26941201244527424,"score_spread":0.254068155163585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152564363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18946673,0.000024149387,0.000010461472,0.003191119,0.0002839557,0.00033433133,0.0000015147668,0.0000230896,0.80666465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52777225,0.000008197754,0.00004279235,0.00074747094,0.000019823356,0.000003741031,0.0000031154284,0.000003356361,0.47139925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861777,0.000037722864,0.00013588626,0.00020505853,0.00048414484,0.0005193986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995086,0.000043089294,0.000037047103,0.00020356831,0.000073102,0.00013459157],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003084791,0.00009449353,0.00011357503,0.000022220649,0.00029120262,0.0001212036,0.00029976742,0.000039863982,0.012119963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005689104,0.000087731205,0.00002959618,0.00011504056,0.000039307855,0.00029782907,0.000098952034,0.00009007957,0.00029670936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013243824,0.000038926344,0.021110363,0.000037257814,0.000024961655,0.00005923243,0.0010637909,0.000057607802,0.000002365258,0.42680508,0.5501903,0.0005968254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015457744,0.000023987366,0.016261077,0.000010987578,0.00001312129,3.4032763e-7,0.020289348,0.000004583875,0.000010247868,0.000866132,0.96222425,0.00014133942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99946064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42593896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011380903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001008321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152998903","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Canadian Statistics Related to Courts, Crime and Justice: Hate Crime, Cybercrime and Organized Crime Data from the UCR","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cybercrime; Criminology; Dark figure of crime; Crime statistics; Criminal justice; Hate crime; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.2114752518177409,"score_gpt":0.461260991834616,"score_spread":0.2497857400168751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152998903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021246758,0.02023401,0.00013079777,0.07588184,0.0052785333,0.0032656824,0.020918353,0.00028873613,0.8718774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.075590886,0.05277207,0.018145353,0.011441731,0.00682802,0.00009281646,0.0071468283,0.00054354296,0.8274388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304616,0.0012143042,0.0008043503,0.0016105126,0.00171961,0.001605063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890293,0.0049793664,0.00023932617,0.0028450107,0.0013041818,0.0016028127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070020915,0.0005561586,0.00082632725,0.00030011576,0.006401042,0.003017978,0.004441177,0.0008293923,0.0029202136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017017793,0.00043840086,0.000044739285,0.0003175381,0.0023967435,0.00075825775,0.001914674,0.0015035647,0.00071578217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003184386,0.000014348797,0.00008422087,0.000085843545,0.000096961885,0.00014435199,0.004537441,1.1435834e-7,0.00002237409,0.040559366,0.9529741,0.0014490794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025856416,0.00007111135,0.005349195,0.00051560416,0.0007404826,0.000009130611,0.010747951,0.000026734251,0.000012596001,0.0104114,0.9712223,0.00063496083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97617376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9093197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073466204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041829073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057434742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153105991","doi":"","title":"De verdachte in beeld","year":2020,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Amsterdam eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immediacy; Videoconferencing; Political science; Standardization; Public relations; Law; Telecommunications; Engineering","score_opus":0.057197918245152225,"score_gpt":0.30185579895636033,"score_spread":0.24465788071120811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153105991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028723523,0.0003806819,0.000024626255,0.004253888,0.0006884928,0.0005417055,0.000035847494,0.000093022354,0.9911094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6468608,0.00018945438,0.00013201428,0.00284962,0.00097547594,0.000022877131,0.000008246747,0.00007198878,0.34888956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966215,0.00015989182,0.00071814086,0.0008751039,0.00076068385,0.00086467835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983013,0.00034865417,0.00030870296,0.00046259558,0.00007497499,0.00050372194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070624443,0.00056542153,0.0007596014,0.00014505164,0.00038815863,0.00026344633,0.00095450465,0.00069062243,0.0014374283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011042042,0.00063213723,0.00037158676,0.000049790524,0.00077333127,0.00015031298,0.00035078565,0.0010576195,0.002553463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019774126,0.000028927449,0.0005102387,0.00025152767,0.00007958562,0.0010408717,0.022691758,0.0000031486104,0.0001727238,0.92896277,0.0037721405,0.042288557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038326628,0.00027059088,0.00032892884,0.0011304569,0.0001699263,0.000016723507,0.0015678413,0.000033262233,0.000102769096,0.042208154,0.9529032,0.0008848765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042550866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048998073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036112303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051228364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153280904","doi":"","title":"The Limits of Legislation as a Tool of Reform: A Study of the Westray Reform to Organizational Sentencing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Discretion; Legislature; Political science; Reform Act; Law; Criminal law; Law and economics; Law reform; Humanities; Public administration; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02799897484760974,"score_gpt":0.3049734801350045,"score_spread":0.2769745052873948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153280904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850586,0.00013869777,0.00013738034,0.0123346215,0.00007353918,0.0002150977,8.2141503e-7,0.00000465914,0.0020365678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992769,0.00025184662,0.000012140967,0.00006522987,0.00013516899,0.0000013751298,1.6744784e-7,0.000005415582,0.0002517647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982871,0.00013257498,0.0003497214,0.00008482053,0.0006376004,0.0005082035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999153,0.000060756123,0.00030453244,0.00010315734,0.00033030423,0.000048241793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017227246,0.000059206282,0.00011747994,0.000022780227,0.00044089125,0.000020836696,0.00043231147,0.000028929744,0.000011273568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006198098,0.00003348565,0.00005807138,0.00050722715,0.00008133412,0.00015834096,0.000043600518,0.00036762466,0.0000021885337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044037393,0.0002948855,0.032029416,0.00002525035,0.00023320407,0.000001390881,0.11036378,0.00026242534,0.013649943,0.82945377,0.00009137774,0.013154165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095911574,0.0035906166,0.031491213,0.00016841762,0.00018618813,0.000052995976,0.89856386,0.00007323249,0.0055345106,0.056373034,0.0027587384,0.00024809103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051785433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03167301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006177951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024775597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153394644","doi":"10.69554/cvje6605","title":"Data protection and privacy in Canada: A balanced approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied marketing analytics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Privacy protection; Data Protection Act 1998; Computer science; Information privacy; Business","score_opus":0.07614690909519434,"score_gpt":0.2934011525176709,"score_spread":0.21725424342247657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153394644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71113926,0.00066271855,0.003086378,0.009754013,0.00023752765,0.0008220425,0.000039317845,0.00010002269,0.2741587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971326,0.00015594346,0.0022248446,0.00009130057,0.00007488786,0.000009018738,0.0000166629,0.0000056768667,0.00028903576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998891,0.00013241167,0.00015825646,0.00031711112,0.00026433184,0.00023692042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932235,0.00021598964,0.000055880217,0.00029549038,0.0000389926,0.00007129943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016502069,0.00006802344,0.00013021233,0.0000236608,0.00019427079,0.00006274545,0.00021866802,0.000039670755,0.00001874395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009937919,0.000074223055,0.000008120197,0.00034446627,0.000055798075,0.000072244664,0.00018914917,0.000147779,9.912828e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011695107,0.00077204016,0.21774143,0.0027710919,0.00035473058,0.00053479616,0.022235582,0.0020336683,0.00666894,0.1012771,0.056415323,0.5880258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00166499,0.000020261154,0.21034569,0.00046080718,0.00026880496,0.00003443972,0.1003468,0.087466694,0.0003695145,0.0031640232,0.59423506,0.0016229267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6255797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90535873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5864029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023083572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012430205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3769136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153775865","doi":"","title":"Familial DNA Searching and the Charter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Charter; Law enforcement; Political science; Criminal investigation; Law; Search and seizure; Internet privacy; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.015934804188315183,"score_gpt":0.301017470300988,"score_spread":0.28508266611267286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153775865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8857907,0.008476237,0.0011451419,0.08231294,0.00041439116,0.00010704285,6.578325e-7,0.000023144341,0.021729736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839559,0.010155488,0.000014967555,0.00033555756,0.0006784618,0.0000013742329,2.1487963e-7,0.0000044195704,0.004853621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800193,0.00036297954,0.00010220629,0.00010112134,0.00029394266,0.0011377973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995954,0.00016563616,0.000036591813,0.00006956389,0.000064801585,0.000068022695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003583454,0.00005207218,0.00008649505,0.000016279764,0.0010535493,0.00017720144,0.0001621401,0.000030274108,0.000053728407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025739678,0.000034894834,0.00006184502,0.00009311399,0.0002703669,0.00017604609,0.00003662694,0.0009299251,0.000017070217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041538347,0.00000840651,0.00035825348,0.0000017317295,0.00002603805,0.000008865375,0.0065989885,5.5816497e-7,0.00018859949,0.96219444,0.00016348419,0.030409073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010467983,0.0000669134,0.0009931746,0.000033526907,0.000053719745,0.00050397345,0.07341791,0.00003846239,0.00009300744,0.82551736,0.09807629,0.00015885079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007532828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013955693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13667709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018397665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001914346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8103156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154330720","doi":"10.71781/1806","title":"La communication de la preuve civile au préalable dans les litiges commerciaux internationaux","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08230419390672043,"score_gpt":0.41598245748313656,"score_spread":0.3336782635764161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154330720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5053368,0.00053866435,0.000047597656,0.0012412821,0.00024804208,0.00041109117,0.000044050685,0.000002654663,0.4921298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85976034,0.00095858495,0.001883093,0.000033450513,0.000093777526,0.00006620393,0.00048950576,0.00002491752,0.13669011],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669343,0.00178018,0.00038609255,0.000391492,0.00039249458,0.00035629774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678355,0.0019904315,0.00039290404,0.00048081606,0.00022563616,0.00012665149],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024073618,0.0002500775,0.00032898213,0.00006050033,0.0009766096,0.0007603679,0.0020627007,0.00056154653,0.0031421108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045450503,0.00027597434,0.00011386953,0.0002050181,0.0006407562,0.0007797304,0.00029628264,0.0005663018,0.00095602666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111622954,0.00048184814,0.046433795,0.0002015308,0.000116157586,0.000011510297,0.67705995,0.00013287381,0.0007555877,0.050057527,0.0032226522,0.22141492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000277518,0.000067990775,0.033283845,0.0019276759,0.00018397858,0.000008230429,0.18780291,0.0004225732,0.0018976362,0.0008820626,0.7728015,0.00044405923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15286072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2339751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7695789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009264402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013665123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154864199","doi":"","title":"Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest: A Case Comment on the Ontario Court of Appeal's Decision in R. v Fearon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Charter; Phone; Smart phone; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03024602025830636,"score_gpt":0.3104287704989319,"score_spread":0.28018275024062556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154864199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96908724,0.00019389216,0.0009951302,0.027091745,0.00015094638,0.00020952975,4.3529943e-7,0.0000053695253,0.0022656932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981061,0.0003668653,0.000070786125,0.00069963996,0.00013766486,0.0000054987872,2.14948e-7,0.000007369984,0.00060581055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972944,0.00039493077,0.00027214122,0.00015350038,0.00065342576,0.0012315535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989292,0.00056279206,0.0001180129,0.00017467479,0.00007353729,0.00014177382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007996607,0.000102038386,0.00016382703,0.000094206785,0.00045562125,0.00006706995,0.00039596847,0.000051884475,0.0000758781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028809765,0.00007243069,0.000074254174,0.00019955315,0.00009059693,0.00009386445,0.00006200201,0.0011898294,0.00005436514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002500912,0.0018117542,0.041720368,0.000045044933,0.00011857885,0.0004936451,0.19476011,0.0024929305,0.0013248143,0.5685235,0.03684502,0.14936331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028212548,0.0049319174,0.01621237,0.00096099766,0.00010492948,0.00087522616,0.1512259,0.00023384076,0.0022179906,0.3571841,0.46228567,0.00094578665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18899305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86211914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6731261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024951168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016661052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8164075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154957571","doi":"","title":"Proving History: The Role of the Expert","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Gatekeeping; Supreme court; Certainty; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Function (biology); Political science; Admissible evidence; Principal (computer security); Law; Flexibility (engineering); Indigenous; Administration of justice; Epistemology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.023381213690428546,"score_gpt":0.29532527265618524,"score_spread":0.2719440589657567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154957571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6058966,0.06623556,0.00019464846,0.09563573,0.0027227658,0.000494336,7.735345e-7,0.000043245436,0.22877632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150914,0.0018293036,0.000005494482,0.00008224154,0.00046027012,0.0000021680037,1.544083e-8,0.0000045216975,0.0061068735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985584,0.00012410841,0.00010395931,0.000069552516,0.0003224708,0.0008215017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935013,0.000044360902,0.00023892414,0.0002740791,0.00006030687,0.000032201642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021743043,0.000049711947,0.000068040456,0.000009656998,0.0020364097,0.0000720006,0.0011660666,0.000032229476,0.00004324512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040840014,0.000026401854,0.00009698799,0.000020856194,0.0004186608,0.00023031005,0.00006426047,0.00064413185,0.0000056920994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015039892,0.000017594188,0.0043269014,0.0000011801461,0.000022210002,3.95398e-7,0.010830961,8.555864e-7,0.0010230014,0.9308916,0.0011525587,0.05171776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080064754,0.00004350456,0.0017824483,0.000029748287,0.000018773962,0.000022504635,0.02400987,0.000009535858,0.00024216369,0.19450997,0.7791815,0.00006995749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00775801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0288864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7780289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009151184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030674834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155074877","doi":"","title":"Digital Evidence and the Adversarial System: A Recipe for Disaster?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legislature; Deference; Judicial deference; Constitutionality; Political science; Law and economics; Adjudication; Law; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03518808634820638,"score_gpt":0.33194664786966277,"score_spread":0.2967585615214564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155074877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6406712,0.028543923,0.043934144,0.18089995,0.007233153,0.0036051583,0.000028516592,0.00020400329,0.09487996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236345,0.0022893639,0.000022350567,0.000029263427,0.0013204962,0.000012942516,1.9217389e-7,0.000007331435,0.003954595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804175,0.0001130775,0.00017827703,0.00015509407,0.00030457744,0.0012072546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882793,0.00052612653,0.00024005203,0.00021499398,0.00009985857,0.000091042995],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585002,0.00008970855,0.00015703234,0.00001860105,0.0035536988,0.0012258112,0.0006800255,0.000053187458,0.000003912778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021835836,0.000057694822,0.00011714337,0.000027102324,0.0006716782,0.0012231381,0.000071107854,0.0004755949,0.000009407175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059929333,0.000008403635,0.00073149684,0.000014732464,0.0000428669,0.0000018317342,0.0028728254,8.2198403e-7,0.0000051970487,0.95315224,0.00019020731,0.042380087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006436358,0.0009168823,0.0012776168,0.0011840186,0.0005059492,0.0006919145,0.16582732,0.00042511016,0.000011240679,0.6709498,0.15106457,0.0007091932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009604543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069824755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042921014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012291736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155889527","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v28i2.4805","title":"A Correctional Plan for the Canadian Federal Penitentiary System","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Law; Criminology; Psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08348274547826251,"score_gpt":0.3210316049180903,"score_spread":0.2375488594398278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155889527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12989941,0.0017592098,0.027787482,0.7758328,0.0115905125,0.002000404,0.000096801545,0.00013693827,0.05089645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963687,0.000020821688,0.00057469786,0.0015564851,0.0011586798,0.0000067920005,7.840083e-7,0.0000090723415,0.00030394504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987175,0.00012096807,0.00027969334,0.00010640345,0.00049169094,0.00028374422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985339,0.00048057703,0.00024431836,0.000069203095,0.00021730315,0.00045468344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008996249,0.000086186104,0.00016589058,0.00006913517,0.0015154077,0.0002050311,0.0003935444,0.000063084575,0.000057788067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048557506,0.0000611963,0.00018717682,0.00015890562,0.00009006944,0.00016746145,0.000013479169,0.0003138612,0.000025174553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010004542,0.00009728047,0.011618756,0.0000917042,0.00029832075,0.0001527025,0.0380069,0.0015022572,0.0001481328,0.10509113,0.8301182,0.011874175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078448467,0.0005099649,0.0030339907,0.00013195556,0.00015323776,0.00007943777,0.051339142,0.0018209212,0.000057048575,0.00012861146,0.9417508,0.00021036943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043821912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19427384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8664693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035228176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012072473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158122767","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v25i1.5022","title":"“With Liberty and Justice for All”? A Look at Criminal Justice in America when the Blindfold is Removed*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05467087593697693,"score_gpt":0.34480966713022976,"score_spread":0.2901387911932528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158122767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6255179,0.0014174553,0.012886314,0.3493316,0.0008985944,0.00089337357,0.000027452756,0.00003543107,0.008991926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96696377,0.0021074174,0.013779715,0.007995117,0.00089990086,0.000023300146,4.1154883e-7,0.000039956514,0.008190396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806464,0.00020788574,0.00043034914,0.0002387282,0.00060839124,0.00044998448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969058,0.0019135353,0.00050619553,0.00020787802,0.00022567192,0.00024093724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013538689,0.0001675146,0.00030494577,0.00012187841,0.00046617832,0.000093298055,0.0004514548,0.00008707502,0.00009317299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010373115,0.000085127205,0.00011102601,0.0001618492,0.0004621041,0.00038997168,0.00006683255,0.00026486555,0.000015038473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012087203,0.0010649003,0.0070028584,0.0005560666,0.0004119615,0.00033728554,0.22257306,0.00007999302,0.0045059593,0.028687684,0.5346725,0.18802053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003325526,0.0016811439,0.0030831685,0.00074912515,0.0024422926,0.00012452311,0.04154594,0.00012497322,0.0005720417,0.0022120923,0.94366914,0.00047001804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003581749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009668393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40899664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025874408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028699997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35855138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159314728","doi":"10.24908/fede.v22i1.14459","title":"Addressing the NCR System","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federalism-E","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Jurisdiction; Political science; Focus (optics); Public administration; Federal jurisdiction; Federalism; Business; Law","score_opus":0.25231660590179555,"score_gpt":0.4043100161719303,"score_spread":0.15199341027013474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159314728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15126407,0.0026082334,0.00030417248,0.11245327,0.0022190446,0.00020689181,0.000005704323,0.00029399694,0.73064464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98950577,0.000029621151,0.000116829935,0.00093737023,0.0005539322,0.0000065996483,0.0000016503233,0.0000050082613,0.008843192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990347,0.00023713804,0.00009687459,0.00013141063,0.00028486294,0.00021498927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950916,0.0001440098,0.000033552868,0.0001579329,0.00009432558,0.000060995866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004293283,0.000051085168,0.00007788766,0.0000073228844,0.0015687672,0.00041381532,0.00017600128,0.000042655793,0.0002226498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016647877,0.000036853467,0.000053827465,0.00013334642,0.00011398741,0.0001366952,0.000043741533,0.00008403701,0.00014374217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008489545,0.000021228036,0.00070592074,0.000067442335,0.000017237662,0.00018684733,0.02508571,0.0000111698,0.00056618167,0.8769036,0.09016708,0.006259092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006366877,0.0000043376926,0.0008733745,0.0001400081,0.000017469209,0.000017778799,0.03762027,0.000029318247,0.0005324091,0.00073583936,0.9598642,0.000101317426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031851877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034465687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8761678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006482886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015970887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159602959","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Human Rights Code’s Distributive and Recognitional Functions in the Workplace","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive property; Code (set theory); Business; Computer science; Political science; Programming language; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics","score_opus":0.034135031908694456,"score_gpt":0.26524797259001065,"score_spread":0.2311129406813162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159602959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629096,0.00004079146,0.000039825616,0.0063535576,0.000102182275,0.00018230065,0.000024550181,0.000016910413,0.030330285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988605,0.000007189004,0.000045664663,0.00006311265,0.00006695784,8.6434926e-7,0.000019567613,0.000003227867,0.011188383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982989,0.0005971168,0.00011547524,0.00024391433,0.00044676126,0.00029787765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865246,0.0008074431,0.000106682506,0.00020990109,0.00012326895,0.0001002686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019592086,0.00010284573,0.00013212298,0.00005433194,0.005053743,0.000098723955,0.0005302259,0.00011772766,0.00030137127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014902289,0.000083302155,0.00008043691,0.00026855298,0.00092736096,0.0005041299,0.00010798358,0.00043793974,0.000057118894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005701814,0.00025495683,0.72327167,0.000022717737,0.00008491754,0.000030195255,0.077956475,0.000008761636,0.00019370468,0.18680829,0.008397848,0.0024002842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037565368,0.00006286734,0.65212864,0.000050090315,0.000047810638,0.0000036682893,0.010942986,0.0000019313807,0.000010524095,0.017786803,0.31846035,0.00012867374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03504423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87691283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8418686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002267619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083228304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99624157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159747714","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10017","title":"Freedom of Thought in Canada: The History of a Forgetting and the Potential of a Remembering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Phenomenon; Freedom of thought; Law; Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; Forgetting; Freedom of the press; Freedom of association; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.030290128625064618,"score_gpt":0.2543291883215786,"score_spread":0.22403905969651397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159747714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378348,0.020047652,0.000105389845,0.0020482144,0.00029304862,0.00005467845,0.0000046427454,5.6182e-7,0.03961101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987129,0.0006493116,0.00015985368,0.000076933684,0.00006739387,1.2520907e-7,3.414465e-8,0.0000023861676,0.0003310871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860615,0.00060195074,0.0003665437,0.000057110345,0.00028476998,0.00008346551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998788,0.00029131476,0.00064902805,0.00006920967,0.00017480063,0.000027651486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012076778,0.000050060957,0.00024642562,0.000005535849,0.000065862594,0.0000070964747,0.00016625666,0.0000056931535,0.000009227652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104444385,0.000030642215,0.0000431723,0.00006708293,0.000660168,0.00010945556,0.0000510135,0.00012589383,4.2738126e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009162108,0.00007154369,0.0052883932,0.000155422,0.00012315498,0.00024083833,0.07699135,0.0010982633,0.0066968976,0.89830166,0.007898319,0.0022179668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050721588,0.00030668624,0.32579544,0.002732504,0.00022366035,0.00016192807,0.055955626,0.0007392669,0.0046939324,0.0027178514,0.60123026,0.00037068405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17716089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5986085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007927476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005340821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161893035","doi":"10.32920/24233095","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Secret Law and the Special Advocate System in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Secrecy; National security; Law; Certificate; Political science; Security interest; Clearance; Computer science","score_opus":0.0209342376014512,"score_gpt":0.265503398194201,"score_spread":0.2445691605927498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161893035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5102724,0.000050079736,0.0000011606852,0.011249724,0.00055573497,0.00022752055,0.0000042547576,0.00004434259,0.4775948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704504,0.000034072607,0.000004660982,0.00039809794,0.0005861804,0.000007288676,9.793574e-7,0.0000029396315,0.0019207558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913263,0.0001368898,0.000119021075,0.00011682015,0.00027188542,0.00022274378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952877,0.00028644095,0.000023412833,0.00008016966,0.000018011418,0.00006318114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082560367,0.000049577884,0.00010355768,0.000014869332,0.00029880865,0.00006411851,0.00015574784,0.000025061725,0.00010122053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005383003,0.000032571414,0.000016116372,0.00015804634,0.00020832683,0.00008749166,0.00004110079,0.00006617271,0.000035879555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038207523,0.0000018303326,0.0016885416,0.000023094852,0.000003932521,0.00005211649,0.011665284,0.000006812819,0.0000031123445,0.9709025,0.014691291,0.0009232743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011267442,0.000017167822,0.016112365,0.00013111874,0.000025283127,0.0000042891893,0.2527329,0.00052003656,0.00005706219,0.005380372,0.72360367,0.0002889704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019076417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004978628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22982249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163644874","doi":"","title":"LE DROIT A L'INFORMATION GOUVERNEMENTALE: L'INTERPRETATION RESTRICTIVE DES EXCEPTIONS S'IMPOSE-T-ELLE TOUJOURS COMME LA BONNE?","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Access to information; Information access; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04539991461337515,"score_gpt":0.31120393074152175,"score_spread":0.2658040161281466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163644874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003511729,0.23800984,0.00087176636,0.16389693,0.0011005142,0.0020615368,0.00016928567,0.0000485403,0.5903299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85250694,0.13291992,0.00017872767,0.0070809475,0.0000936186,0.00008190563,0.00003556708,0.00001684298,0.0070855087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755055,0.0010917542,0.0004027396,0.00015811957,0.00029769336,0.0004991497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868435,0.00022760873,0.00019692551,0.00028886422,0.00016270042,0.00043954962],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018235501,0.00017242985,0.00024639344,0.00006430881,0.0018903796,0.00019612051,0.00038868995,0.000104334074,0.0026192584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064587995,0.00016413315,0.00016248305,0.0006083579,0.0008532865,0.0010856002,0.000021185444,0.00026182222,0.0011909419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035020817,0.000024665505,0.00019395731,0.0006919876,0.000032777123,0.000007455035,0.010982794,0.000017950348,5.6654017e-7,0.83078766,0.0843161,0.072940566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010311543,0.000040337913,0.001235596,0.0033301096,0.00019397883,0.000033160843,0.005716056,0.00004281068,0.0000018465205,0.010968804,0.9781377,0.00019649458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57192534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.840125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013721702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019946499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164765015","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3309921","title":"A Primer on Interlocutory Injunctions","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Primer (cosmetics); Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.01723984645550887,"score_gpt":0.31117517846627407,"score_spread":0.2939353320107652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164765015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7148496,0.00804062,0.008514367,0.16958895,0.006335593,0.0005398628,0.000014903555,0.00019081104,0.09192532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422278,0.021441538,0.0000112770485,0.00026832262,0.0016975848,0.0000045520046,2.040756e-7,0.000021565482,0.034327175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957123,0.00032219192,0.00032760805,0.00028892665,0.0005947928,0.002754187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989733,0.0002459115,0.00021582203,0.00021869177,0.00013948524,0.00020679036],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025430883,0.00020660118,0.00020873704,0.00014632227,0.00087572355,0.00016171476,0.0005011034,0.00014654723,0.00042017424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003177161,0.00013517067,0.00024031627,0.00023053488,0.00036718076,0.000460502,0.000047721383,0.0014740697,0.0014138179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017280522,0.00014226366,0.0011054778,0.000004457531,0.00013364376,0.0000050436,0.0008210676,7.414149e-7,0.00052292185,0.8255387,0.0026231832,0.1689297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008397756,0.0023684395,0.0014704141,0.0006505873,0.00017578718,0.0001744512,0.0079950625,0.0000018598827,0.00017117853,0.2533524,0.7323371,0.00046293763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057945546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022935213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7297139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024251707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038750481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165723968","doi":"","title":"Canadian Legal Developments","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.025074134614304855,"score_gpt":0.27685606041164285,"score_spread":0.251781925797338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165723968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30385494,0.000048856065,0.00013965317,0.001898113,0.00014596936,0.000120606564,0.000038116796,0.00008085096,0.6936729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63564765,0.00009953347,0.0135094235,0.00042550958,0.00014063859,4.5826053e-7,0.000009601808,0.00001785801,0.3501493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823225,0.00061863847,0.000096180804,0.00027722254,0.00029330686,0.0004823944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909806,0.00006568634,0.000031235595,0.00018312347,0.00008437125,0.00053754065],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012391157,0.00011443737,0.00012707777,0.00018466813,0.0018105513,0.00016980244,0.0005621047,0.00012070809,0.004586938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017701424,0.00013376522,0.00007681207,0.0005969362,0.00016094824,0.0005792754,0.000026759104,0.00030237518,0.0018697866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032099453,0.00014334595,0.04928535,0.000035691624,0.00017864176,0.0018328445,0.0906584,0.0000429582,0.00037408792,0.2651705,0.005047521,0.58690965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013068371,0.000007643512,0.0014644923,0.000014001923,0.00002381557,0.000001536799,0.0138098635,0.0000010392959,0.000022380063,0.0002260437,0.98411775,0.00018077271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56453323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6466878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063806813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009689937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165917194","doi":"","title":"Les secrets de commerce, un droit éparpillé en attente d’une loi","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026966500140954464,"score_gpt":0.2909492631034481,"score_spread":0.2639827629624936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165917194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60411525,0.05729745,0.033793718,0.06883991,0.0021798057,0.0006939342,0.000045170815,0.0002768147,0.23275794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159486,0.013431028,0.0030306734,0.0022832607,0.00065990933,0.000039749924,0.000023553344,0.00008198799,0.1645012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438643,0.0017748072,0.00065506995,0.0008561328,0.0007370741,0.0015904559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964642,0.0016749089,0.0002229947,0.0005979201,0.0003938339,0.00064614904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018036123,0.00051972317,0.0006477589,0.00012124038,0.001860977,0.00027525538,0.0009265445,0.0010835498,0.007904245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020278138,0.0005922049,0.0004916413,0.0013361934,0.002699216,0.0003608766,0.00030636953,0.0019568275,0.00074693165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037592085,0.0007501411,0.005914217,0.000875519,0.00043832156,0.0011529141,0.1396123,0.00021776407,0.004741938,0.3096542,0.036066793,0.5002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005493055,0.00025349093,0.00077353365,0.0006263672,0.00035944337,0.00036207374,0.038685933,0.001683664,0.014612989,0.03033433,0.9108513,0.0009075438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012059927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005970765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019933654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092046557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167020393","doi":"","title":"A Jurisprudential “House of Cards”: The Power to Exclude Improperly Obtained Evidence in Civil Proceedings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Nothing; Jurisprudence; Political science; Power (physics); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061878701009776646,"score_gpt":0.3434289064114926,"score_spread":0.28155020540171594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167020393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15802152,0.24638966,0.0000030946665,0.55846983,0.00055450626,0.0028816368,0.000021606935,0.000059070342,0.033599064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666471,0.026234465,0.000022341053,0.006155463,0.00010152625,0.000060046415,2.7374972e-7,0.000014471812,0.0007643096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982942,0.00022756451,0.00030521833,0.00023430852,0.00046474452,0.00047401243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988272,0.00013425425,0.00007739421,0.0003181774,0.00033494036,0.00030799015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002869565,0.00011251987,0.0002783911,0.000042128584,0.0004892144,0.00011694747,0.00082030526,0.00004898326,0.0005093798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022512802,0.00006988992,0.00011319437,0.0008558301,0.00021571683,0.00018903452,0.00007934854,0.00018868381,0.00013122833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009008373,0.00011305515,0.007840122,0.006666153,0.00012657975,0.00042574623,0.16930605,0.000009827644,0.0021917447,0.3593804,0.3885527,0.06529754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057825,0.000037912636,0.0044883983,0.0061752805,0.000082331484,0.0000113523365,0.0023490903,0.0000010445435,0.00005802441,0.00018551125,0.9863953,0.00016516788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37167633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93859714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031507947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021000148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63250774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168285016","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Animal Law in Canada: A Case for Federal Animal Welfare Legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Federalism; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Legislature; Jurisprudence; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Federal law; Politics","score_opus":0.027300680925867966,"score_gpt":0.286120793130313,"score_spread":0.25882011220444506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168285016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8662554,0.0011041104,0.00014563995,0.13094404,0.00007117576,0.00019762978,0.0000058236947,0.000012898581,0.0012632684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858433,0.00023534613,0.000050317456,0.00064770924,0.00040531068,0.0000052122414,0.0000013225352,0.000009349496,0.000061082086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980234,0.00009614849,0.00020112316,0.000173949,0.00022736093,0.0012780201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999601,0.000057312962,0.000078336874,0.00003271131,0.00006110216,0.00016955081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007459457,0.00009639217,0.00014385977,0.000019974223,0.0011625207,0.00016949998,0.0001101452,0.00004846789,0.000019039857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010483806,0.000096502095,0.00004050361,0.000100034,0.00005961963,0.00037864715,0.000019308258,0.0005916472,7.0255675e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002927667,0.000010276678,0.0024369599,0.000010842561,0.000018264469,0.00024481927,0.0034082767,0.000009484936,0.000103157276,0.98985326,0.00032883213,0.0032830762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061526624,0.004244313,0.009515394,0.0001260018,0.00018198503,0.009537259,0.3668144,0.0038385626,0.00013810625,0.11747267,0.4801312,0.0018474411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92596275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87238055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001462001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049321377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8941287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170316163","doi":"","title":"The Early Years (1985-2000): Pioneering the Charter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Parliament; Law; Legitimacy; Political science; Period (music); Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.019196475312868302,"score_gpt":0.3035101797308633,"score_spread":0.28431370441799503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170316163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987584,0.0039391965,0.00040567972,0.07061079,0.0015791043,0.00019787403,7.07821e-7,0.000038715316,0.024469504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208463,0.006060264,0.0000039450083,0.00007562774,0.0010059272,0.0000034991374,4.8554693e-8,0.000007819506,0.010758207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978023,0.00010094624,0.00012300281,0.00009320897,0.00036744174,0.0015130595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993587,0.00010343857,0.0001358547,0.0002854483,0.00005040823,0.00006612398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003513896,0.00006727407,0.00006659606,0.000013168663,0.005769569,0.0008743846,0.0010954648,0.000040738887,0.00002174761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002309895,0.000038867878,0.00008773795,0.000037976293,0.00033597794,0.00035809432,0.000051813437,0.0010109537,0.00011908827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033693912,0.000012448019,0.0026432972,0.0000010321864,0.00006421999,0.000008011372,0.010094284,0.0000030960853,0.00009030824,0.8127664,0.0010229705,0.17326024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022994314,0.00013389469,0.047651917,0.00003282267,0.00004217054,0.00008535432,0.013995041,0.0000146819975,0.000016723045,0.23403408,0.70357,0.00019337577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025491167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019388307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.702547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038260236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012532249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170381205","doi":"10.29173/alr2695","title":"Breaches, Bargains, and Exclusion of Evidence: Bringing The Administration of Justice Into Disrepute","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10007347982826421,"score_gpt":0.3878837029583781,"score_spread":0.2878102231301139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170381205","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12368641,0.71201444,0.00010559616,0.10772003,0.000661488,0.0022307378,0.000008957515,0.00003446309,0.053537868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441333,0.054439228,0.00007250014,0.0007659289,0.00003878924,0.000022147333,0.0000023742052,0.000004360959,0.00052139605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986139,0.00039918078,0.0003089508,0.00015702247,0.0004000465,0.00012092963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839205,0.0010783442,0.00020736991,0.00021599303,0.000058944992,0.000047328795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019393303,0.00006912948,0.00020381852,0.000010592962,0.00068068405,0.000017616621,0.00028546547,0.000018486584,0.00021198978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007747182,0.00004788374,0.000063257925,0.0002314449,0.00025426643,0.00021694676,0.00019676604,0.00009687458,0.0000024031356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000836567,0.00011837347,0.00066472375,0.0107646715,0.00003786154,0.0000067650735,0.025119826,0.000007851852,0.0006051468,0.8709362,0.004805697,0.08684923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006285032,0.00015589655,0.00055470935,0.005331151,0.0005169645,0.000020162466,0.002605965,0.000040637606,0.0001312217,0.0011328106,0.9892916,0.00015601932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044368252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015823597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9844859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035927467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119143784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96199536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170456961","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing De Minimis Non Curat Lex","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Law; Political science; Statute; Criminal code; Charter; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02714707616689497,"score_gpt":0.32566866911246806,"score_spread":0.29852159294557307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170456961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8968008,0.0033140387,0.015378676,0.04219135,0.00078577915,0.0001625594,0.0000017283631,0.000089688,0.04127536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751224,0.008879062,0.00010409182,0.00016154752,0.00087037706,0.0000025887102,1.1531881e-7,0.000010620276,0.014849203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693894,0.00017549214,0.00018382343,0.00014717547,0.0002839891,0.0022705735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940026,0.00016029639,0.00010761659,0.00009576739,0.00007545487,0.00016058142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002855265,0.00009034109,0.00011529674,0.00004621682,0.00062638544,0.00007457418,0.00034522117,0.00007834523,0.00028705574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033970675,0.00006392355,0.00009962286,0.00011394953,0.00017663097,0.00046094143,0.000020134295,0.00051231275,0.00013786714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007486555,0.000048954338,0.00898485,0.0000053271137,0.00006943861,0.000017952836,0.011558985,0.0000016237909,0.0059646927,0.5127429,0.0057456,0.4547848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008633272,0.00038943157,0.0012020213,0.00026492463,0.00007174218,0.0003678803,0.056375667,0.000007179816,0.0015201421,0.4541678,0.48424822,0.0005216681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010485925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010954205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4785026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015016643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003173672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61127037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170502834","doi":"","title":"Automatism and the Burden of Proof: An Alternative Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Automatism (medicine); Pleading; Bullion; Burden of proof; Supreme court; Force majeure; Presumption; Law; Reasonable doubt; Res ipsa loquitur; Conviction; Law and economics; Decriminalization; Extraterritoriality; Acquiescence; Contingency; Indictment; Witness; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Jurisdiction; Liability; History","score_opus":0.027666045119082595,"score_gpt":0.3013957625948746,"score_spread":0.273729717475792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170502834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8086427,0.010527561,0.021863885,0.12580739,0.00020476447,0.0008529466,0.000003400699,0.0000731566,0.032024223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975916,0.0013135686,0.00014294547,0.00010323015,0.000609027,0.0000029968019,2.75725e-7,0.0000050147687,0.0002313565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984822,0.00029927978,0.00014914681,0.00010817824,0.00030658388,0.0006545623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995902,0.000073363946,0.000125554,0.00005663063,0.000060261285,0.00009396947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021211656,0.00006125405,0.00013030422,0.00001563006,0.00035232614,0.00006033639,0.00032404868,0.000030611045,0.000013158771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017978103,0.000039332277,0.0000447526,0.0001066088,0.0003748676,0.00025844006,0.000029303486,0.0005892836,0.0000019422198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008276179,0.000013187406,0.00005012208,0.0000066799976,0.00004242494,8.4312484e-7,0.06343425,0.000075152995,0.000044200315,0.9191524,0.0000575273,0.01704046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015974558,0.00064324995,0.00012801819,0.000034699537,0.0001146875,0.00011233567,0.1950571,0.011962222,0.00011460313,0.78232247,0.007693938,0.00021921292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026764337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006237695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18894891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000953141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008320876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40459847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171534268","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Law Journal: Criminal Justice and Evidentiary Thresholds in Canada- The Last Ten Years 43(3) 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Calgary; University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Publishing; Law; Pleasure; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02300772216673051,"score_gpt":0.2754929415263409,"score_spread":0.2524852193596104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171534268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9298039,0.013717075,0.000121377634,0.052272286,0.00060972385,0.00016496262,0.0000023658,0.000016620259,0.003291705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199856,0.014308707,0.000019055049,0.0022254873,0.0013544591,0.0000017113705,3.651963e-7,0.000015179163,0.00007649784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967553,0.00032915935,0.0003320012,0.00019248608,0.000719236,0.0016718112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999162,0.00019103728,0.00016187923,0.000092692884,0.00009086935,0.00030152578],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023950308,0.00013852041,0.00018725384,0.000032639007,0.0011036599,0.0003278713,0.0006365428,0.000058422956,0.000058550835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002749761,0.000109648856,0.00006961888,0.00026260526,0.00020398916,0.0005024285,0.00008073779,0.002365376,0.000013675232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006388417,0.00012218166,0.060761698,0.00019587482,0.00039633465,0.0022417845,0.050717626,0.00040274806,0.00025828803,0.75082403,0.035949126,0.09749146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010166097,0.00045305045,0.029973255,0.00021020566,0.00096725003,0.0032012132,0.79436094,0.00012598796,0.0000151755285,0.054161124,0.11487651,0.0006386514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7572404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74364334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015258339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007211902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171617816","doi":"","title":"Schrems II et invalidation du Privacy Shield, un goût de « déjà vu »","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Déjà vu; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03887194882315802,"score_gpt":0.2768162615606441,"score_spread":0.23794431273748606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171617816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24930857,0.0029753163,0.0433428,0.61042535,0.00037594978,0.0003474753,0.000029647757,0.00020676365,0.09298813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96241623,0.0035479509,0.017363196,0.0025409246,0.00015854939,0.000022060805,0.00008626032,0.000033872115,0.013830936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971826,0.007973601,0.0004977757,0.0006255821,0.00060879375,0.00057598326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995597,0.0016887634,0.00035583306,0.0007995775,0.0010386987,0.00052010635],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007518234,0.00026507734,0.00028863965,0.00006202286,0.0013568818,0.0005128195,0.0013448271,0.00025368322,0.001455665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005899858,0.00031074154,0.00018893022,0.0009529096,0.00067211257,0.00085254054,0.00072792696,0.0004939887,0.00035466813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020838275,0.00044114317,0.0039517647,0.00010673704,0.00003791954,0.000011154407,0.16410741,0.00002744104,0.0034019484,0.760084,0.0106484,0.057161264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006078414,0.0000035079122,0.003336654,0.0011664536,0.00011453594,0.000014101606,0.0027943125,0.006654608,0.032734297,0.009907538,0.9420817,0.00058447605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008242403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041154213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93143326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019400395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054031995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172109281","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10018","title":"Introduction to a Comparative Study of the Right to Freedom of Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04399751502040146,"score_gpt":0.32629332117035204,"score_spread":0.2822958061499506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172109281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95914656,0.0004641997,0.00026212726,0.0062835454,0.00047358705,0.00018052975,0.0000087048675,0.0000024021024,0.033178344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974958,0.000029391686,0.00050864095,0.00016560138,0.00058818044,6.153183e-7,8.425072e-8,0.0000038331154,0.0012079114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767256,0.0011163618,0.0004411461,0.0001491827,0.0004983585,0.00012238136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984361,0.00014084092,0.0005153714,0.00017262505,0.0006281698,0.00010690453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084732205,0.00009405807,0.00036905386,0.000015830414,0.00021955525,0.000036760986,0.00032788212,0.000009052135,0.00005594796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009737796,0.00006448094,0.00006872579,0.00036791406,0.00024963243,0.00020230089,0.000102947364,0.00014879978,0.000007734644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091340754,0.0011921402,0.0026405775,0.000033836903,0.00021725992,0.00008986413,0.3085543,0.0029625706,0.012254156,0.5782486,0.09238222,0.00051107846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077633787,0.0014413699,0.09976646,0.00030536536,0.00008151783,0.00002282427,0.029943807,0.000005518314,0.017260442,0.00035189601,0.8498688,0.00017569716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002107968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040709684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7574865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032846798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007763783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26294565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172337906","doi":"","title":"Dommages punitifs et action collective en droit québécois: Électrochoc aux fabricants de cigarettes","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"RTDciv : Revue Trimestrielle de droit civil","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06081302426901593,"score_gpt":0.3209518049488637,"score_spread":0.2601387806798478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172337906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.676976,0.011707962,0.0077308887,0.1917928,0.0013892063,0.0016297525,0.00020131258,0.0006221112,0.10794995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404545,0.0074638487,0.00023023007,0.0034208326,0.0018324647,0.000089155415,0.000026341717,0.00008692764,0.046395727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945746,0.0013988062,0.0007261699,0.0010177379,0.0006742909,0.0016084097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956982,0.0020575107,0.00044003202,0.00044111698,0.00032431964,0.0010388342],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015809292,0.00055014837,0.000839362,0.0001651437,0.0010415624,0.00035182765,0.0009990108,0.00065219955,0.00084029435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030916494,0.0007338825,0.00044676938,0.002349853,0.0007363502,0.00095792155,0.00018877958,0.0013916823,0.00029386257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002053746,0.0016618106,0.005800222,0.0013763366,0.00095828157,0.0015949503,0.3772158,0.0011110759,0.009988468,0.13680094,0.33242303,0.12901534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00241193,0.002090173,0.0115793375,0.0014759767,0.0012313446,0.0002853372,0.062026646,0.003985925,0.011860675,0.04049744,0.8601844,0.0023708171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048204865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018753635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52776134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030042783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009584204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172923753","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3854006","title":"Digitally Rethinking Hunter v Southam","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.023532968274534004,"score_gpt":0.30377815075381565,"score_spread":0.28024518247928165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172923753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63655,0.012777369,0.008868364,0.046320435,0.001601461,0.00015189959,0.0000026859425,0.000173858,0.2935539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803378,0.0029302742,0.000079837904,0.000345445,0.0007268499,9.5024365e-7,0.0000010341504,0.000010367214,0.015567432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723774,0.00015138274,0.00017888057,0.00016062001,0.0004478109,0.0018235451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944675,0.00008067599,0.000079484744,0.000111284025,0.00017187269,0.00010990431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020357205,0.000082563296,0.00011263348,0.00003311991,0.00074491836,0.00031418382,0.0002744045,0.000072373616,0.00019127653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039287654,0.000078743964,0.00012595643,0.00017528298,0.0000988399,0.00044626775,0.00004316586,0.0011960018,0.0001011313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020903377,0.00004140991,0.002978987,0.0000042187908,0.000062854895,0.00007059755,0.010767289,0.000007144927,0.00021071473,0.9601589,0.0006826168,0.02499436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018616208,0.00007515815,0.00028070246,0.0000580689,0.00003239968,0.00035759294,0.037983686,0.000003379535,0.00010546196,0.82231164,0.13841076,0.0001949793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002805009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018366484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3437878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061934633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047153826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175018809","doi":"","title":"Ius puniendi and Constitution: A Comparative (Canadian-German) Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; German; Obligation; Law; Human rights; Political science; Criminalization; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Constitutional court; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04852281668302009,"score_gpt":0.35195399515505726,"score_spread":0.30343117847203716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175018809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30527997,0.021218034,0.0025204518,0.23624226,0.00051936024,0.000540717,0.000014444877,0.00010805791,0.4335567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962954,0.0022620508,0.000038298618,0.0006187757,0.0003499056,0.0000016933159,5.0502075e-7,0.0000029775242,0.00043039306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981203,0.00012717556,0.00011414345,0.00016058254,0.0002141766,0.0012636094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992859,0.000051474544,0.000057619876,0.000041330797,0.00014428007,0.00041943506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066927174,0.000086752356,0.00013609821,0.000048033697,0.0010515178,0.00012270431,0.00017403149,0.000048881713,0.00010832666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013547933,0.000082709594,0.000046795612,0.0001918331,0.0004468119,0.0003420507,0.000015736669,0.0008601765,0.000071715156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021960028,0.0000056064528,0.0003339533,0.0000011073186,0.000030125773,0.00001321546,0.022615932,0.0000031364052,0.000014797394,0.9758288,0.00053609686,0.00059525867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052269734,0.00043565253,0.00057910284,0.000029348908,0.00007856629,0.00035904036,0.32535142,0.000084652194,0.000020015657,0.31530413,0.35690013,0.0003352746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053473804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48678684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6910154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012600721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006377735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176644622","doi":"10.71781/2274","title":"La protection de la vie privée dans le cadre de la lutte contre le terrorisme au Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02221603363352455,"score_gpt":0.3219413091953063,"score_spread":0.29972527556178175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176644622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.724404,0.0001499039,0.00011897964,0.0016147523,0.0005023911,0.000816411,0.000042507803,0.000002460262,0.2723486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90114164,0.00003447778,0.0002637958,0.00003798682,0.00020654993,0.000080321886,0.00006534282,0.000024634133,0.09814527],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698496,0.0014254529,0.00028327332,0.00044710623,0.0003670172,0.00049220194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877596,0.00044560563,0.00028015923,0.00021459267,0.0000865114,0.00019714834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018281295,0.000253295,0.00033573667,0.000033141867,0.0009145189,0.00041968835,0.0007421541,0.00058056513,0.000388605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029588767,0.00027500695,0.00008856427,0.0001926338,0.0003593054,0.00041624025,0.00007181655,0.00056675845,0.00008053411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006478002,0.000677427,0.032672543,0.00092074816,0.00033569988,0.00073839194,0.550304,0.00087291456,0.029018862,0.023004588,0.0069682323,0.3538388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045980298,0.000064003456,0.022356408,0.00073338364,0.00014934615,0.000043124015,0.16354507,0.00021322607,0.00580453,0.00021584009,0.80592257,0.0004926872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99516356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79895437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012106856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018375807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176814128","doi":"10.7202/1077699ar","title":"L’arrêt Vavilov : à la recherche de l’équilibre perdu entre la primauté du droit et la suprématie législative","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06476375195694965,"score_gpt":0.3425187939748964,"score_spread":0.2777550420179467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176814128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47941718,0.0041697193,0.0040327217,0.030783815,0.00040922395,0.00025916126,0.000085980115,0.00015508712,0.4806871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7440755,0.0052296664,0.01317552,0.0020970919,0.00058582926,0.00003939613,0.000041084957,0.00008682084,0.23466912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990725,0.006415451,0.00045300965,0.0007039934,0.0006318202,0.0010707484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012196,0.0085275,0.00020709373,0.00043330202,0.00021188216,0.00049823616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054524303,0.00040469292,0.0005277593,0.00007634178,0.000542773,0.0004588198,0.00066479994,0.0017589332,0.0012774696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041274442,0.0004944251,0.00039801796,0.00081692106,0.0023075151,0.0007121019,0.00018186103,0.0024307016,0.00018058061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006336084,0.0002671846,0.0029649832,0.0002541514,0.00012706379,0.0011580059,0.15302338,0.00006397308,0.0010347705,0.78976613,0.006382489,0.04489451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006394766,0.00010736503,0.0042580296,0.0007458115,0.00039267584,0.00050721894,0.04782497,0.0008785028,0.0014606396,0.27410614,0.66824365,0.00083548616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022788562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024970379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026135065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020644695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176978327","doi":"","title":"The Law of Evidence, 8/E","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08485086586115496,"score_gpt":0.33247200833234447,"score_spread":0.2476211424711895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176978327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025926824,0.008385542,0.0000070018914,0.014039313,0.0009630876,0.00044684482,0.00002751501,0.00010571037,0.97599906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023640566,0.004065571,0.00013092766,0.0023670255,0.0023845297,0.000033941877,0.000010301623,0.000049248185,0.9673179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688333,0.00030926158,0.0005432446,0.00047665348,0.0012674929,0.00052001217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967323,0.0015812317,0.00038140855,0.0006310112,0.00027674658,0.00039728987],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013628833,0.0002891516,0.0004945198,0.00002409429,0.0013699273,0.00030244354,0.0015438523,0.0003802353,0.00079472555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097545737,0.00020044601,0.00034073455,0.00016872132,0.0020470382,0.00043476996,0.00023666397,0.0007576454,0.0013759368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000297572,0.0000069220864,0.0000112675625,0.00007900748,0.000028235283,0.00001493157,0.00064522884,7.84571e-7,0.000010188889,0.7962577,0.20225559,0.00066038425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059143567,0.00007082751,0.000010427935,0.0007403813,0.000093370385,0.0000011309893,0.00039398763,8.459849e-7,0.00004056911,0.04944898,0.94889057,0.0002497718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013613405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057497885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002515817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013396187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180126862","doi":"","title":"Mr. Big and the New Common Law Confessions Rule: Five Years in Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Discretion; Doctrine; Political science; Common law; Test (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Management; Economics","score_opus":0.030696488304902278,"score_gpt":0.32737013601135195,"score_spread":0.29667364770644966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180126862","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06961317,0.25336617,0.00015545246,0.6545068,0.00029604387,0.0005399222,0.0000019359193,0.000037482372,0.02148303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8160985,0.17785713,0.000008726717,0.004897899,0.00031123153,0.0000019011803,3.4021562e-7,0.0000047180843,0.00081952097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983868,0.00033725685,0.00018310061,0.000103496066,0.00022384623,0.00076547096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995284,0.00016374612,0.00008182542,0.00006322725,0.000023607496,0.00013920113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019949782,0.00006443946,0.00018173328,0.000012379037,0.00033512572,0.00006146994,0.0002679271,0.00003728652,0.000053294425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020871649,0.00004429172,0.000057305384,0.0001799812,0.00024685226,0.00011787407,0.000040197207,0.001054076,0.000023307752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039985323,0.000006757693,0.00018184159,0.000014726172,0.000012218531,0.00000637146,0.0041849157,8.6900747e-7,0.000006816728,0.9599904,0.002964697,0.032590415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012175863,0.00012178934,0.00044795213,0.0008094763,0.00009371819,0.00006982824,0.014119799,0.000014625585,0.000003954206,0.47341463,0.5095015,0.00018514672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007136785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051954795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74648535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014359276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015429094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182379942","doi":"","title":"When Efficiency Calls: Rethinking the Obligation to Provide Reasons for Administrative Decisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Balance (ability); Quality (philosophy); Supreme court; Law and economics; Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Ideal (ethics); Economic shortage; Political science; Business; Law; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.07482044169617426,"score_gpt":0.3867717577138122,"score_spread":0.311951316017638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182379942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39224517,0.0013998629,0.3362034,0.24687468,0.0013700436,0.0022235047,0.000011601186,0.00012964066,0.019542083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942248,0.00025939228,0.0011482133,0.00048535387,0.0011311321,0.000027757327,8.0742564e-7,0.000009999381,0.0027125725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732214,0.00021512325,0.0002388715,0.00020563423,0.000489709,0.001528509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835014,0.00079164875,0.00014190929,0.00015669719,0.00041173503,0.00014788807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006051303,0.00009905597,0.00010822797,0.000055364588,0.0028489581,0.00024064796,0.00058896723,0.00007039805,0.000031429863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039174356,0.000068473564,0.00009896336,0.00026960537,0.0002735825,0.0002773157,0.000034984005,0.0006457652,0.00004163367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011215225,0.000033360873,0.00012187635,0.0000013365433,0.000023906745,8.0260094e-7,0.037787154,0.0000048246743,0.000202703,0.92788756,0.0036068663,0.030217448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014791438,0.00091819244,0.0001536961,0.000084436775,0.00004420101,0.00003705397,0.028644176,0.00004347451,0.00014178685,0.82152385,0.14812425,0.00013698837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083232793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11165177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6019796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007601022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049670567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182697146","doi":"","title":"Dissipating Normative Fog: Revisiting the POGG's National Concern Test","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legislation; Political science; Jurisdiction; Test (biology); Abandonment (legal); Law; Doctrine; Legislature; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.05355706795702781,"score_gpt":0.3451867450639342,"score_spread":0.2916296771069064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182697146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108666524,0.0064836745,0.008895756,0.7479221,0.00041018619,0.00049991306,0.000014470655,0.0001705844,0.1269368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945277,0.0008240687,0.000047020378,0.0014993387,0.0026660182,0.0000030749425,0.0000010099424,0.000008005663,0.00042374272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976101,0.00021391916,0.00023878766,0.00012533313,0.0006440653,0.0011677755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987835,0.0006194587,0.00021306521,0.00004461121,0.0002222846,0.00011704365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003006921,0.00008890661,0.0001081586,0.000016527329,0.0016579846,0.00019839333,0.00040841577,0.000036709687,0.00010221003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030473848,0.0000641144,0.00008703329,0.00023676528,0.00015836638,0.00042488473,0.00004229286,0.001217387,0.00006806285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026379254,0.00001359404,0.0064346353,0.0000110874125,0.000056863963,0.0000050669355,0.030427562,0.000057660014,0.00023871906,0.90304166,0.0015349995,0.058151778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008037906,0.00052262045,0.0025515093,0.0002236778,0.00012696533,0.00021794344,0.26480213,0.001510562,0.000124224,0.3746308,0.35377502,0.0007107532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038211423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010061043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8858612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061839964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024543232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183808766","doi":"","title":"Innocence Compensation: The Success Rate of Actions for Negligent Investigation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Law; Mistake; Punitive damages; Political science; Tort reform; Compensation (psychology); Criminology; Business; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.24044514039966616,"score_gpt":0.37750581917824655,"score_spread":0.13706067877858039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183808766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037395686,0.0125161465,0.0000707479,0.97876483,0.00013177977,0.0010725866,0.00001927674,0.000011662716,0.0036733986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629995,0.009785432,0.00003837302,0.026798047,0.00016072791,0.00005061753,0.000005842612,0.0000041458015,0.00015726415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930674,0.00022486207,0.00015320003,0.000080434555,0.00010321937,0.00013151993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927783,0.00018918465,0.000087450615,0.00012940625,0.00014412068,0.00017203117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009038901,0.00004493951,0.00010128497,0.000008553939,0.0007727006,0.000037130758,0.00033979162,0.00001808553,0.00017417829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007138951,0.000028052176,0.00004557475,0.00031273975,0.00025925154,0.00009520875,0.000009397661,0.00006186937,0.000034371147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039761235,0.000002454601,0.00066344225,0.0008639938,0.000015256866,7.42267e-7,0.008811483,0.000023956032,0.00003626135,0.89039904,0.085823216,0.013356173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018766294,0.0000102943695,0.0010923931,0.0003435779,0.000047224064,3.4390374e-7,0.00038967095,0.000031652136,0.000038899154,0.0013215333,0.9966613,0.000044324654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17786169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56700796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000778453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078615925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.827613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184383708","doi":"","title":"Trial by Jury and the Toronto 18","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Terrorism; SWORD; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.050745364031610285,"score_gpt":0.4114201833595153,"score_spread":0.360674819327905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184383708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29062864,0.011780244,0.0000391532,0.0799459,0.0007094005,0.00022689532,0.0000013133243,0.000042623586,0.61662585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91724426,0.0011744079,0.00005463865,0.0004722192,0.00039771208,0.000007778224,6.096907e-7,0.0000029125035,0.08064545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994801,0.00013840394,0.00004356294,0.00008653623,0.00014406226,0.000107330576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996311,0.0002010082,0.000016151667,0.00008337542,0.000024359926,0.000044020297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042568872,0.000030708994,0.000063316205,0.0000011820614,0.00026362675,0.00007269717,0.000073281444,0.000026532407,0.0010545639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002669593,0.0000213195,0.00002445008,0.000032927666,0.00020002942,0.000078980745,0.000029227223,0.00003425937,0.000015764776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00322418,0.00004788623,0.00004544246,0.000009631283,0.000016845423,0.000011885231,0.10426932,1.4631732e-7,0.00055560895,0.28105554,0.59380317,0.016960373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028016288,0.000016398555,0.000028837998,0.000004984733,0.00001325985,6.8783817e-7,0.03039591,0.0000016741456,0.00012371567,0.0007783148,0.9657913,0.00004331718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01997625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01979633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62661564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026901596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070055656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184672076","doi":"","title":"Is Password Compulsion Constitutional in Canada? Two Views","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Silence; Suspect; Order (exchange); Constitution; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024288330935174966,"score_gpt":0.31428217725030105,"score_spread":0.2899938463151261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184672076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466197,0.0028273626,0.0005789214,0.017030984,0.0009596308,0.0002148635,0.0000032192536,0.000012243625,0.031753108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586153,0.0015567007,0.000025790769,0.00059807365,0.00020654652,0.0000012781434,9.853406e-7,0.000003461589,0.0017456409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754864,0.00014198676,0.00022133214,0.00014248615,0.00048905873,0.0014564892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995858,0.000079812206,0.000091774054,0.000079423175,0.0000633215,0.00009983367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015962297,0.00008180188,0.00014544779,0.00004911794,0.0002930243,0.000041031235,0.00026477294,0.00003207933,0.00049804896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004318167,0.00007459764,0.000053061955,0.00017867652,0.00013030817,0.00021143323,0.00002205321,0.0009079551,0.00011152216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002757114,0.000019036237,0.08410345,0.0000031922534,0.000013153359,0.000008789968,0.00057525065,0.000077560195,0.00005386596,0.90184003,0.001736551,0.011541531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012906422,0.00013628461,0.011224985,0.00017365854,0.000024386285,0.00021440785,0.018998543,0.00020401557,0.00004054229,0.22724882,0.73999125,0.0004524959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84538525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73825467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004368691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02592217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185596930","doi":"","title":"Negotiating Trauma & Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.057483983902578355,"score_gpt":0.3935547551056512,"score_spread":0.3360707712030728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185596930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40133095,0.0006233304,0.000057008623,0.04908689,0.00043198705,0.000038796636,0.0000033187307,0.00001652454,0.5484112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910565,0.00007418579,0.00025863748,0.0031754167,0.0048339153,2.518597e-7,2.7968764e-7,0.0000059013046,0.0005949236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885726,0.00027022112,0.00025240477,0.00007277114,0.00031584056,0.00023151717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994006,0.00012357788,0.00017311548,0.000036021236,0.00014878735,0.000117871474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008425472,0.00006439015,0.00018984804,0.000026527696,0.0014872317,0.0002483267,0.00011101873,0.00007833977,0.000023480356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020654977,0.000060817016,0.00011086836,0.00006962309,0.0002808949,0.00040791446,0.000029517509,0.00028900572,0.0000022637685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006326086,0.000023731222,0.00003264355,0.000009060006,0.000013018008,0.000029882443,0.040869553,0.00000115506,0.00015405248,0.95213604,0.00060133357,0.0061232126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033217182,0.00005847516,0.000543865,0.00005792044,0.00005232866,0.000062776075,0.03341086,0.000003703287,0.00010949372,0.04039275,0.9248272,0.00014845621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023838315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035669482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92422587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007347829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002632532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186127184","doi":"10.29053/pslr.v14i2.1817","title":"THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF WARRANTLESS SEARCH AND SEIZURE OPERATIO","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pretoria Student Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search and seizure; Constitutionality; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Psychology; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.09316596242632554,"score_gpt":0.41426896489091636,"score_spread":0.32110300246459084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186127184","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038980357,0.611012,0.00017233701,0.22766152,0.0015329113,0.0035655277,0.000044636177,0.00009801436,0.116932705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9022545,0.09616098,0.000031357653,0.0012868094,0.00019712254,0.00001617124,0.0000010952393,0.0000021087362,0.000049855666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987299,0.00029368815,0.00021382702,0.00014356147,0.0004889772,0.00013004472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940133,0.00019740334,0.000038475573,0.0001080571,0.00015218908,0.00010256129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013402944,0.00005904105,0.00018496289,0.0000018445284,0.0005909061,0.000064839274,0.0002817014,0.000024400973,0.00007339193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024265319,0.00003948831,0.000044658955,0.00010514944,0.00062865904,0.000109009576,0.000089905625,0.000087802946,0.000013557319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047538697,0.000009947504,0.0015990306,0.000540401,0.000014137471,0.000001113651,0.002330921,8.2580624e-7,0.000014776576,0.9934785,0.0011795162,0.0008260817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006507442,0.000020586824,0.00061422016,0.00058279396,0.000051599472,5.7458163e-7,0.00048751387,0.0000027861226,0.000021609048,0.0001854194,0.9979048,0.00006305008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001127349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009975882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99672526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021079823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001272674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45448315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186149690","doi":"","title":"Nevsun, Atlantic Lottery, and the Implications of the 2020 Supreme Court of Canada Motion to Strike Decisions on Access to Justice and the Rule of Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Plaintiff; Political science; Civil procedure; Supreme Court Decisions; Economic Justice; Common law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.025394997871988425,"score_gpt":0.3147616564819254,"score_spread":0.289366658609937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186149690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80657876,0.0006538932,0.00077619037,0.19005246,0.000111553854,0.00025593583,0.000009987186,0.000001597603,0.0015596048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976257,0.0013490127,0.0000121986905,0.0007961625,0.00006689603,0.0000035564433,3.1013295e-7,0.0000031983332,0.00014298517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868417,0.00024369726,0.00022989503,0.00009592692,0.00035133245,0.0003949947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985302,0.0008618206,0.0001395491,0.00017575768,0.00022777703,0.00006489129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016279407,0.00005572209,0.00014506308,0.000014595463,0.00058346015,0.000052376035,0.00042181837,0.000021866594,0.000011861275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008276266,0.000029151552,0.000045335546,0.00025404175,0.00027270918,0.00007935697,0.00010015933,0.00028803086,2.2824169e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016012535,0.000021695761,0.001191074,0.000009303955,0.000039519065,3.3767813e-7,0.0025034794,0.00020624799,0.00029703966,0.9922089,0.0012032962,0.002158969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044651665,0.00046604432,0.20454955,0.00075053016,0.0017402766,0.0003242092,0.065495275,0.00020946989,0.0033006351,0.6844386,0.033772554,0.00048768343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20023806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85998017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65974206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014267197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020898334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8050876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186406658","doi":"","title":"The Dangers of Charter-Proofing the Toronto 18 Terrorism Prosecutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Terrorism; Legislature; History","score_opus":0.02350748093011518,"score_gpt":0.3225714292013905,"score_spread":0.2990639482712753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186406658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5247767,0.13324364,0.004076824,0.19423807,0.0039789616,0.00088103145,0.000007685789,0.00010081637,0.1386963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462796,0.008919312,0.000014744198,0.000081144375,0.0005171342,0.0000068181707,4.023717e-7,0.000005702264,0.0058268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979185,0.00025407108,0.00019180604,0.00010116132,0.0003706106,0.0011638587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993181,0.00018211533,0.00012264952,0.00016768096,0.00015699104,0.0000524559],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028196077,0.00006610009,0.00008525303,0.0000074390323,0.0019440339,0.0001219109,0.0004010697,0.000040159863,0.000087292115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000262608,0.000038874325,0.000111558475,0.00012078873,0.00024716216,0.00023198659,0.000035107587,0.00062072667,0.000006725834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019148412,0.00003459423,0.000416922,0.0000038983326,0.00008235661,0.0000039212464,0.01537606,0.0000029534071,0.0012148685,0.93812495,0.0019138753,0.042806458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025096833,0.00018806824,0.0010963995,0.00007221293,0.00010580535,0.00019480522,0.36937395,0.000021323374,0.00065899035,0.22380805,0.40403125,0.00019817623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002756476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15301874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7143169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006874409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027904867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190185424","doi":"","title":"Criminal Law & Digital Technologies: Drawing Lessons from the Canadian and American Experiences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Parliament; Legislature; Institution; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.024770566816783742,"score_gpt":0.3122259319741356,"score_spread":0.28745536515735187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190185424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9033265,0.0057857926,0.00014359459,0.08294065,0.00017236637,0.000052053038,0.000005756906,0.000050912055,0.0075223832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965599,0.0026534642,0.00005965838,0.00028544603,0.00020945004,0.0000050370713,0.0000013461798,0.000006446646,0.00021925618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977098,0.000075125325,0.00013368505,0.00020280968,0.00030809845,0.0015704563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938554,0.00019409128,0.00007313013,0.00013048074,0.00008294333,0.00013379655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006598047,0.000096598604,0.00012435285,0.000028452743,0.0025821174,0.000844966,0.00041671097,0.000054415843,0.00002931376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034120932,0.00007281075,0.000056641245,0.00024167322,0.0012613687,0.00042446013,0.00005394813,0.0009217475,0.000008275443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075014336,0.000011842669,0.0032811088,8.531673e-7,0.00003786627,0.00004304049,0.035400562,7.3409916e-7,0.000029350133,0.8356097,0.00016279166,0.1254147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004913629,0.000046640107,0.00029906398,0.000019533078,0.00002403819,0.00009882056,0.7747413,0.0000025112568,0.00003945866,0.16888675,0.0556802,0.00011254944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45710734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7393407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006883048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005475435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190312094","doi":"","title":"Police Independence vs Military Discipline: Democratic Policing in the Canadian Forces","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Law; Political science; Appeal; Parliament; Charter; Conviction; Democracy; Military justice; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03469928588067964,"score_gpt":0.3264900781105808,"score_spread":0.2917907922299011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190312094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047892,0.00009514769,0.000017601273,0.017710969,0.000525537,0.00015770049,0.00000260878,0.000013743518,0.076687455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943815,0.00004309644,0.00011399076,0.0029999793,0.0023636909,0.0000039473816,4.8382327e-7,0.00000776166,0.00008555782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794394,0.0003304898,0.00026465143,0.0001510755,0.00065358443,0.0006562555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991494,0.00017194169,0.00006498485,0.00017092656,0.00014147886,0.00030131044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020847376,0.00011359425,0.00012777548,0.00011074262,0.0043307147,0.00030423456,0.0008471869,0.000095999836,0.00011119013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118232965,0.000081908576,0.000060021845,0.0003259869,0.00065527315,0.00056415476,0.0000437156,0.0004819638,0.00007656462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014483812,0.00014257364,0.17106095,0.000057263547,0.00005444261,0.0004405425,0.44614837,0.00008826265,0.00011533523,0.33493507,0.027407067,0.019405318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055165397,0.00045515184,0.24174742,0.00047183395,0.00008842127,0.0006955565,0.576892,0.00026636283,0.00008835756,0.083204664,0.09478782,0.0007507275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99709666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25173038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000404896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044550194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191397226","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Examination of Police Interrogation of Criminal Suspects in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, New Zealand, and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04300386071974556,"score_gpt":0.31496062095054483,"score_spread":0.2719567602307993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191397226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99760556,0.00021525116,0.0000034673271,0.0013836521,0.000040333638,0.000114010356,0.000011689703,0.000003439358,0.00062261394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980128,0.00011592274,0.00006173176,0.000076624005,0.00004071493,0.0000027579463,0.000020314676,0.0000023516077,0.0016668241],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989638,0.0003484068,0.00020167242,0.00012681502,0.00022503511,0.00013430098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991383,0.0004412527,0.000103256854,0.00007863991,0.00014780406,0.000090761976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046182575,0.00006941311,0.00018722376,0.000039431838,0.000090204696,0.0000376295,0.00008047897,0.000036746107,0.000050181086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010506284,0.000057128473,0.000013580312,0.00024427145,0.0003480115,0.00014943884,0.000031586846,0.0001021807,4.7768077e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005994034,0.00012334346,0.02958353,0.00027903574,0.00007621913,0.00003007465,0.7402,0.00019496391,0.0012881075,0.22339585,0.002860792,0.0013687203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006331176,0.0002736246,0.48390654,0.00080317305,0.00022390774,0.000023773859,0.41909504,0.000546697,0.013171574,0.007969506,0.0671611,0.0004938963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98810786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99724966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.454323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007914908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032361224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23296316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192292574","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v40i3.11189","title":"The Role of Expert Evidence in the Defence of Provocation and Emotional Stress in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; CLARITY; Culpability; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Liability; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04652257504750107,"score_gpt":0.31233174186825174,"score_spread":0.2658091668207507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192292574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941494,0.0014719983,0.0000034733978,0.0010198107,0.000026475695,0.00015703455,0.0000011049849,0.0000014550134,0.0031692642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997206,0.00008306759,0.000028265285,0.000022675356,0.000016758415,0.000009466195,1.6955953e-7,0.0000010788407,0.00011794021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993975,0.000122056794,0.00010647089,0.00007651018,0.00021035038,0.000087111344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942774,0.00038285824,0.000049615694,0.00009429246,0.00003599147,0.000009520269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064718997,0.000028523333,0.000048379246,0.000017800221,0.000047683887,0.00001977205,0.00017624452,0.000021430627,0.000017185792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001587537,0.000016641696,0.000012757042,0.00012009687,0.00014329552,0.00015452006,0.00002116409,0.000042917873,0.0000035362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042434804,0.000049067527,0.56175005,0.000034036915,0.0000017058894,4.202083e-7,0.39762098,0.000015426096,0.003182378,0.031150147,0.00005235259,0.006100982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024211903,0.00014449863,0.7437435,0.0015077787,0.0000076269134,8.91987e-7,0.22742413,0.00039251603,0.0031482961,0.009776419,0.013433388,0.00017884765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008725091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001266345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011953158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004273419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13189785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193835978","doi":"10.29173/mlj1204","title":"Involuntary Detention and Involuntary Treatment Through the Lens of Sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05638311809240237,"score_gpt":0.2618505486272782,"score_spread":0.20546743053487582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193835978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98912156,0.000755542,0.0000051126176,0.007920073,0.0001318674,0.0001346115,0.00001787639,0.0000021980036,0.0019111782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992332,0.0002866611,0.000047355716,0.00024948,0.00016885989,0.0000013644043,4.790734e-7,0.0000028524876,0.000009742253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932843,0.00012195593,0.00017679554,0.00008120377,0.00017370583,0.00011788061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995932,0.00005966697,0.000118112446,0.00006698825,0.00006797826,0.00009402723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016735088,0.00006401117,0.00012195789,0.00001651584,0.0009888618,0.000037270893,0.000096236465,0.000041326628,0.000021384987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013938568,0.000036681697,0.000044524644,0.00007919692,0.00078125834,0.00022264796,0.000027178836,0.000107391046,2.7176583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029236783,0.00028635547,0.37065747,0.00032945635,0.0007490309,0.000051277388,0.3368498,0.000052457057,0.0042103194,0.268097,0.005775154,0.012649258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002242811,0.002062016,0.5154551,0.0006338369,0.0012218201,0.00032066024,0.22729982,0.00020598296,0.0042893933,0.092625335,0.15310997,0.0005332338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9259922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17547168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054199114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000775031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76056254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197001350","doi":"","title":"Similar Fact Evidence & Crime Linkage Analysis: In Search of an Empirical Foundation to Support the Identity Inference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Foundation (evidence); Identity (music); Criminology; Empirical evidence; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10207483421274736,"score_gpt":0.466844231543874,"score_spread":0.3647693973311266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197001350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832737,0.00018895823,0.011163294,0.0043757423,0.00009922569,0.00016287641,8.9957075e-7,0.00001309582,0.00072225195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814045,0.0009705115,0.00009631433,0.00021319125,0.00032817575,0.000003342975,0.0000012085792,0.0000058165842,0.0002410052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962421,0.0007503452,0.00040492255,0.00025135497,0.000942782,0.0014084837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986733,0.00033674747,0.00013777413,0.00026427725,0.00042484395,0.0001630296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011067271,0.00010801973,0.00022290242,0.0002650481,0.00060786563,0.00021662068,0.00094087684,0.000079233185,0.00033543687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010972798,0.000082804836,0.00012761401,0.0016218368,0.00034908726,0.0014389406,0.000084175976,0.00096411,0.00008201152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065359124,0.0005698455,0.5209653,0.000040021718,0.0006108622,0.000029567449,0.08636184,0.00052395766,0.0025858532,0.30415657,0.0002148539,0.08328773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005342451,0.005154543,0.6334599,0.00027427866,0.00087575195,0.00004703837,0.081285544,0.0014542066,0.001315197,0.27050823,0.0043245945,0.0007664261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075386986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24685688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23931818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077160663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039765127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197232492","doi":"","title":"Access to Justice of Young People in Quebec and in Canada - General Observations and Basic Challenges (L’accès à la justice des jeunes au Québec et au Canada – grandes observations et enjeux de base)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Humanities; Context (archaeology); Political science; Paternalism; Convention; Empowerment; Sociology; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Human rights; History; Art","score_opus":0.06904516779055446,"score_gpt":0.31292479091826664,"score_spread":0.24387962312771216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197232492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91839397,0.017554546,0.00006953075,0.06291961,0.00037108513,0.00019719262,0.000027628097,0.0000037172879,0.00046270443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699139,0.02822605,0.00012987234,0.0005207161,0.00014294453,0.00001307989,0.0000031605432,0.000016774351,0.0010335088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661976,0.0005453236,0.0004471739,0.0002864548,0.00047273055,0.001628545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998018,0.0011762219,0.0001878081,0.00013074452,0.00024049992,0.00024668826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028624986,0.00021278551,0.000348689,0.0001068247,0.0004419277,0.00012247983,0.00038105305,0.000089936984,0.000016364222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009245021,0.00022623637,0.000033731023,0.000514027,0.00014410717,0.0011237173,0.00009582843,0.00086869154,2.6951616e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005240185,0.00005265129,0.8155964,0.00048368354,0.000037106758,0.0000093498475,0.021587625,0.0034301642,0.00008319588,0.1556021,0.00013678773,0.0029285268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003868284,0.00006835516,0.9086347,0.00046493913,0.00018439516,0.0000703074,0.08251338,0.00054870895,0.000008371698,0.0047104075,0.002161805,0.00024780622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1541923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012407864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16660017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197260318","doi":"","title":"Humorous Styles of Cause in In Rem Actions: A Comparison of Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Psychology; Political science; Law; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04464207755282544,"score_gpt":0.3305857353715567,"score_spread":0.28594365781873127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197260318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98542315,0.0017764749,0.000024270103,0.012546265,0.000015961927,0.000065922686,0.0000011550675,0.0000018508213,0.00014497642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956831,0.0041735787,0.0000056129957,0.000076218355,0.000023141842,9.740479e-7,4.7239388e-7,0.0000023709897,0.000034581004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987788,0.00022674073,0.00023821642,0.00005757083,0.00021063101,0.0004880209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950886,0.00023809502,0.00012968956,0.00003546912,0.00004643736,0.000041477615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011609788,0.00004261214,0.00015343117,0.000045044453,0.000109517874,0.000012045993,0.0001361619,0.000019888132,0.0000054211605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003005947,0.00003148114,0.000016451162,0.00033788942,0.00016028591,0.0000692061,0.000013965623,0.0005408996,8.3676014e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009883951,0.00011522228,0.20698656,0.00005242822,0.000100926496,0.000015021214,0.124730125,0.0030323372,0.00023057984,0.6586813,0.00052729575,0.0045398013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022476108,0.0003992395,0.021123253,0.00017159287,0.00006283086,0.000027288414,0.9066686,0.0020599412,0.000288809,0.057996523,0.008744386,0.00020989517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87875617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7819385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033951938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025910935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45964888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198677971","doi":"","title":"RACIAL PROFILING AND THE PERILS OF ANCILLARY POLICE POWERS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Harm; Distrust; Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Law; Accountability; Profiling (computer programming); Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.0399597694476228,"score_gpt":0.3306205285925329,"score_spread":0.2906607591449101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198677971","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02719897,0.54021484,0.0000013868138,0.31252423,0.00025772824,0.0007978074,0.00001927616,0.000011750174,0.118974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.869815,0.11912692,0.000039852403,0.0098926965,0.00017812845,0.000010551715,0.0000015617109,0.0000054469533,0.0009298231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990798,0.0003492231,0.00012693512,0.000086645035,0.00016663228,0.0001907482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939704,0.00014217156,0.0000454478,0.00017392468,0.00009732442,0.00014410925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015661748,0.0000489884,0.00016139162,0.000009446857,0.00054634595,0.000036248963,0.00019341856,0.00002454477,0.00024173675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006147786,0.000028706825,0.00005804285,0.0001968116,0.00050359324,0.00005107762,0.000021167702,0.00007887541,0.00001583195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011408011,0.000004511359,0.00050661666,0.0010814127,0.000030955816,0.000020092366,0.030638294,5.531431e-7,0.00002886941,0.9126282,0.012427206,0.042621907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055542903,0.000004277844,0.00028144245,0.0006481824,0.000062642655,0.000008726143,0.00214298,0.0000012996763,0.000017070428,0.00045729303,0.9962646,0.00005595627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4527458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8397759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98383737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006517705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012097497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55089843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198821212","doi":"10.7202/1079765ar","title":"La « formule d’amendement constitutionnel » de la commission Pepin-Robarts : sa genèse, ses mérites et ce qu’il en reste aujourd’hui*","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin d histoire politique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02659669930789583,"score_gpt":0.31536297143297637,"score_spread":0.28876627212508055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198821212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0293688,0.026618544,0.0013029531,0.39323518,0.0012829719,0.0003625413,0.00018252859,0.00018787409,0.5474586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90979165,0.005515736,0.002555785,0.0026755477,0.0005978293,0.00005466484,0.000031175736,0.000039069317,0.07873855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339163,0.0038440663,0.0006030151,0.00060628087,0.00057502784,0.00097995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962215,0.0022171943,0.00024639675,0.00044423982,0.00027449703,0.00059620006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002657204,0.00039416848,0.00045969582,0.000085114014,0.0017442121,0.0003166052,0.00045567626,0.0005809086,0.0038271134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017451748,0.0004476804,0.00027301026,0.00024155759,0.002434377,0.00024403394,0.00029987455,0.00076285825,0.00032527553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002709198,0.00032438192,0.00046065927,0.00027105658,0.0000311078,0.000540354,0.016555874,0.00005901239,0.0004371685,0.7603362,0.21813633,0.0028207335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003952787,0.000072792776,0.001547226,0.0012248126,0.000111266694,0.00041954187,0.011978477,0.000022692499,0.00078671385,0.01630786,0.9666436,0.00048973813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029603748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006317617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88042283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015234742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023035759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199003475","doi":"","title":"La valorisation des renseignements personnels au Québec et au Canada : la promesse des projets de loi no 64 et C-11","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03055051117052922,"score_gpt":0.2908561575292319,"score_spread":0.2603056463587027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199003475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89052606,0.0033349204,0.0033288198,0.007090755,0.0006632549,0.00052408036,0.000024885554,0.00007742964,0.09442981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433681,0.0012635405,0.0036379301,0.00089945376,0.00028860246,0.000101172176,0.000017943154,0.00006141994,0.05036183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938982,0.0029931248,0.00047938174,0.0006717977,0.0007342009,0.0012232577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964639,0.0019683712,0.00020825528,0.00032852133,0.0005615397,0.0004694029],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029387018,0.00042945187,0.0004157766,0.000087774344,0.0019311012,0.000276962,0.00048024152,0.00055113004,0.0010460328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00677706,0.0004504585,0.00020059716,0.0007347755,0.0028939405,0.00047807768,0.00015936584,0.0009593838,0.00006336624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025066704,0.00055631204,0.028443234,0.0016641953,0.0002464853,0.0006671301,0.84526783,0.00022592452,0.0020980814,0.02888068,0.013760745,0.07793871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088602636,0.00041215206,0.008595119,0.00235707,0.0004236036,0.00038061215,0.16700362,0.0010111831,0.013190628,0.008259594,0.7961707,0.0013097143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99641895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78240997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010959512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03328847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199135211","doi":"10.7202/1080618ar","title":"Hugues Parent et Julie Desrosiers, Traité de droit criminel, t. III « La peine », 3e éd., Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2020, 1 164 p., ISBN 978-2-89400-447-0.","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.020289873778138373,"score_gpt":0.2793832642507377,"score_spread":0.25909339047259927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199135211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46142304,0.16157818,0.022023937,0.21577613,0.003874111,0.0011724441,0.0017551832,0.0007352372,0.13166173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7302511,0.08051692,0.0060351645,0.0067563537,0.0017265864,0.00018213545,0.00042724385,0.00015703385,0.17394748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942537,0.000987032,0.0008575365,0.0010788536,0.0010092505,0.0018136424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962865,0.0012792516,0.00033791238,0.0007166779,0.00033096375,0.001048688],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015852937,0.0006391031,0.00085067935,0.00012262625,0.0018946792,0.0006086073,0.00085951586,0.0009859742,0.0022051074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001011851,0.0008071428,0.00066701666,0.0009903308,0.0026705328,0.0007813549,0.00018097466,0.0015289258,0.00033576647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013383037,0.0009211702,0.000603797,0.00050008623,0.0003426858,0.0024267856,0.037990108,0.00063032226,0.0018366377,0.43452603,0.49709317,0.022995384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011108309,0.00021024224,0.0056685684,0.00092747906,0.001128792,0.0006301686,0.034415077,0.0005166435,0.00089371926,0.0907262,0.86246395,0.0013083298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016405093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018554347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36537078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002312683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013210851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199741977","doi":"","title":"La protection des sources journalistiques en droit civil québécois : une oeuvre inachevée","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025360657288765198,"score_gpt":0.2813458070264901,"score_spread":0.2559851497377249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199741977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78321487,0.054046184,0.045930278,0.025809309,0.001046765,0.0005990465,0.000013710596,0.00025359433,0.08908622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87620413,0.011063079,0.0020849667,0.00041819547,0.0007582846,0.0000690349,0.000004893911,0.00006512561,0.10933226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430573,0.0027713103,0.0006001354,0.0006705581,0.00066613196,0.0009861256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974043,0.0010417037,0.00026982254,0.00035415794,0.00050655316,0.00042351382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002492353,0.00042959102,0.000508091,0.00015367847,0.0019058608,0.00046249,0.0005697533,0.0010453223,0.002551062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003731668,0.00046095444,0.0003891527,0.0014876999,0.0038379151,0.00052054564,0.00015836184,0.0020973904,0.00019871413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025152194,0.00044048033,0.0009074323,0.0010216192,0.00025480977,0.00038587378,0.43102583,0.00020531534,0.0029125265,0.08835197,0.004120479,0.47012213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000323719,0.00036723053,0.0006979115,0.0012699594,0.0002954502,0.0007018386,0.10802103,0.0005474738,0.022294143,0.101788454,0.7629292,0.00076362205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101999775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14592923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7588087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021957515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013628629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200096151","doi":"","title":"At the Heart of Youth’s Access to Justice in the Child Welfare System: The Stakeholders Brought Together (Au cœur de l’accès à la justice des jeunes en protection de la jeunesse : les acteurs rassemblés)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Dialog box; Humanities; Child protection; Sociology; Library science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.08242002063319945,"score_gpt":0.3283807263137649,"score_spread":0.24596070568056547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200096151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77629113,0.012459072,0.0015959311,0.20642667,0.00034888394,0.00071126764,0.000011105409,0.000026059206,0.0021298819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925776,0.004987138,0.000020635754,0.0007512571,0.0012340511,0.000036315705,8.03982e-7,0.00003512139,0.00035706465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905649,0.0058097853,0.00047894567,0.00031961233,0.0007224113,0.0021043539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784213,0.0012501135,0.00031355277,0.00025798116,0.00015576206,0.00018043927],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011244347,0.00029091115,0.0003092686,0.000058500962,0.003061569,0.00049203105,0.0016240914,0.00024388137,0.000030036315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014024214,0.00017316165,0.00021351008,0.00097249984,0.00073405594,0.00060926616,0.00017128726,0.0027005652,0.000012247546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013842051,0.00042417893,0.018491345,0.0023142628,0.0004293165,0.000056566034,0.67359704,0.011300272,0.0014664335,0.25249586,0.001191844,0.036848694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003811984,0.00031880802,0.0099630235,0.00066287897,0.0012675674,0.0010382922,0.92255604,0.00018786252,0.0003118134,0.002201619,0.060825247,0.0002856725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029671056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09404432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25029424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020674688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016198391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200241596","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3785707","title":"Overdue Improvements Needed: Canada’s Public Sector Privacy Act (Submission to the Department of Justice, Canada)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Public sector; Law; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.021040072925508305,"score_gpt":0.2815215304382162,"score_spread":0.2604814575127079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200241596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88330466,0.002019688,0.0003385212,0.108565934,0.0013812602,0.00031068688,0.000021879803,0.000009426773,0.0040479708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406445,0.00072146655,0.000025003292,0.0012868502,0.00042293547,0.000004880059,0.0000038156577,0.000009739357,0.0034608496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646467,0.00018592516,0.0002774105,0.00017737746,0.0011363926,0.0017582049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989426,0.000108019674,0.00016245841,0.00020135316,0.0002826654,0.00030291596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013097199,0.0001173787,0.000156471,0.000029020557,0.00093241845,0.000100007965,0.00053004426,0.000040119143,0.00015902807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066233065,0.00008830956,0.00005955267,0.00030143803,0.00003224456,0.00016324701,0.00009050867,0.00062745024,0.0000018004663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036655963,0.00050514645,0.019619878,0.00016460218,0.0010109314,0.00023720718,0.0076033887,0.00024116032,0.009709888,0.3760655,0.4172282,0.16724755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030414583,0.00015202562,0.004962221,0.000046812052,0.00011939463,0.000057504327,0.03782342,0.00001157743,0.0015513448,0.0038621665,0.9508765,0.00023293837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98619497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53364825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045278743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11268615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200313530","doi":"","title":"Relocating Officially Induced Error of Law: Fitting the Remedy to the Wrong","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Excuse; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Ignorance; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Criminal law; Common law","score_opus":0.04459809228247275,"score_gpt":0.3503929474665618,"score_spread":0.30579485518408905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200313530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615998,0.0011180077,0.0007614741,0.11050336,0.00029253095,0.00029223703,3.5382928e-7,0.000030099112,0.025402134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973151,0.00020107419,0.0000708252,0.0010263686,0.0007569489,0.0000014627186,1.2916787e-7,0.0000067541396,0.0006213369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973014,0.00031056427,0.0003193567,0.00012945397,0.00053301564,0.0014062102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913025,0.00023704393,0.00022044366,0.00018064691,0.00015953982,0.00007208975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067154015,0.00009140282,0.00012995173,0.0000307873,0.0016299612,0.00009647215,0.00076420023,0.000054458516,0.000013300651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090224954,0.00005434086,0.00009412113,0.0002850562,0.000097968674,0.00016875743,0.000033142736,0.0011800191,0.000014621162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028784196,0.000020527901,0.00009818413,0.0000013287615,0.000016919348,0.0000010414517,0.012099485,0.00007968088,0.0014462008,0.926442,0.00015855326,0.05960727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006886487,0.0022867613,0.008017327,0.000535472,0.00025252067,0.00023365459,0.26541653,0.00020967794,0.0025179451,0.6069427,0.11208657,0.00081216387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003970635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07906944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31949928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031538654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021376526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200326481","doi":"","title":"The operation of the presumption of innocence and its role in bail proceedings under Canadian and South African law (Part 2)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Law; Presumption; Political science; Restitution; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.043317458131724745,"score_gpt":0.2571281629778647,"score_spread":0.21381070484613998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200326481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9358738,0.00024049154,5.476551e-7,0.007466445,0.000021475398,0.00015710383,0.0000017654675,0.0000029658265,0.056235377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882376,0.00011440997,0.0000068145882,0.00008401964,0.000013294852,0.0000032930975,5.3394906e-8,0.0000012514366,0.00095309207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959075,0.000022860153,0.00009160114,0.00007258066,0.00012108111,0.00010113503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980426,0.00003228036,0.00003448051,0.000032354954,0.000055785138,0.00004083293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031563092,0.000029827132,0.000043000317,0.00001397158,0.00026697974,0.00004098926,0.000085361055,0.000026352933,0.000032105232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065461,0.000017872619,0.000006344822,0.00011337193,0.0002169676,0.00017723604,0.000016733036,0.00003549015,7.5799807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007934606,0.000011939183,0.025728116,0.00001935611,0.0000030225144,7.9867185e-8,0.056150634,0.000015978128,0.00081188086,0.9155962,0.00040652129,0.0012483697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081969827,0.00024998919,0.5128643,0.00042789904,0.000073615716,0.000004309856,0.3179013,0.0110771125,0.008361353,0.014411366,0.1332287,0.00058032374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1632243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7563469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9011848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022271071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035637928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84234786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200458124","doi":"","title":"5Q IA CLARTÉ PLUMCr Qc : cinq questions permettant d’appréhender l’usage d’intelligence artificielle pour accroître la clarté du plumitif criminel québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03425857703274676,"score_gpt":0.3228391989097632,"score_spread":0.28858062187701644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200458124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.195178,0.09741293,0.006994475,0.35243148,0.0055002244,0.0011445698,0.0001816272,0.0006792769,0.3404774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86135465,0.008746843,0.0009192252,0.0021688142,0.0023473569,0.00007142054,0.00003879676,0.000089940055,0.12426297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99257725,0.0015893533,0.0010026171,0.0014556231,0.0010476778,0.0023274987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598986,0.0014529644,0.00031318853,0.001056988,0.00054560386,0.0006413943],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015768228,0.0006975492,0.00076288317,0.00013251373,0.0017324061,0.00054755923,0.0010632228,0.00078482064,0.006321565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093017216,0.00078185246,0.0006473683,0.0013371542,0.0014047147,0.00072796503,0.0003140688,0.0017532285,0.001592032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091503454,0.0012830104,0.00037176898,0.00021548725,0.00022206167,0.00063255534,0.016527753,0.0006513868,0.011528945,0.87601364,0.061230216,0.031231647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024219036,0.00023386118,0.0007884584,0.0003377692,0.0004994661,0.00030128835,0.012651912,0.0025031394,0.005849079,0.018457834,0.9571491,0.0009859067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026804853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07875806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096937286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005171902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201141576","doi":"10.32920/24233095.v1","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Secret Law and the Special Advocate System in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Secrecy; National security; Law; Certificate; Political science; Security interest; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0209342376014512,"score_gpt":0.265503398194201,"score_spread":0.2445691605927498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201141576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5102724,0.000050079736,0.0000011606852,0.011249724,0.00055573497,0.00022752055,0.0000042547576,0.00004434259,0.4775948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704504,0.000034072607,0.000004660982,0.00039809794,0.0005861804,0.000007288676,9.793574e-7,0.0000029396315,0.0019207558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913263,0.0001368898,0.000119021075,0.00011682015,0.00027188542,0.00022274378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952877,0.00028644095,0.000023412833,0.00008016966,0.000018011418,0.00006318114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082560367,0.000049577884,0.00010355768,0.000014869332,0.00029880865,0.00006411851,0.00015574784,0.000025061725,0.00010122053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005383003,0.000032571414,0.000016116372,0.00015804634,0.00020832683,0.00008749166,0.00004110079,0.00006617271,0.000035879555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038207523,0.0000018303326,0.0016885416,0.000023094852,0.000003932521,0.00005211649,0.011665284,0.000006812819,0.0000031123445,0.9709025,0.014691291,0.0009232743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011267442,0.000017167822,0.016112365,0.00013111874,0.000025283127,0.0000042891893,0.2527329,0.00052003656,0.00005706219,0.005380372,0.72360367,0.0002889704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019076417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004978628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22982249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201541166","doi":"","title":"Revue des décisions marquantes de l’année 2020 en matière de vie privée et de protection des renseignements personnels","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0501760318816469,"score_gpt":0.3115207963325583,"score_spread":0.2613447644509114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201541166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657156,0.018424788,0.14759074,0.017897524,0.00064513076,0.001161552,0.000038574435,0.00022504808,0.048301052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83684117,0.014481956,0.055553455,0.0010013793,0.0007890133,0.00024340164,0.000012683308,0.00009751736,0.090979435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937924,0.0027978516,0.0005938297,0.0007640337,0.0004870754,0.0015647911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971784,0.0012059527,0.00021328969,0.00042347508,0.00041842496,0.0005604775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032999823,0.00046323863,0.00048883975,0.00013164524,0.0024687746,0.0003914371,0.000642967,0.000816954,0.0028474687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008846579,0.0005120433,0.00038463034,0.0011693346,0.00233356,0.0004935121,0.000239388,0.0014181299,0.00022688624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061468105,0.0008742356,0.005342179,0.0030992737,0.0004006738,0.0008368814,0.6642567,0.00077862147,0.05294344,0.028661182,0.011694541,0.23049758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012038335,0.0014616854,0.0032239403,0.0073751793,0.0009526874,0.002640822,0.21777685,0.013749452,0.12575153,0.25641036,0.36728355,0.002170113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006642411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007881805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44647986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004509695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020176894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202738108","doi":"10.3917/cdlj.2102.0269","title":"France / États-Unis, deux réponses au terrorisme","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de la Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018762274956384026,"score_gpt":0.3113504354019693,"score_spread":0.2925881604455853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202738108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7993789,0.047020994,0.011221048,0.050569583,0.00556963,0.00017106373,0.000061389044,0.00013588021,0.08587157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8596424,0.0056547704,0.005230383,0.0041753254,0.0018157193,0.000014898406,0.000007716366,0.000035643796,0.12342318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964147,0.0013541466,0.00030705353,0.00049534085,0.0005039253,0.00092482613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962004,0.0026207224,0.00017107156,0.00036349034,0.00023999136,0.00040435113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010968759,0.0002659648,0.00031304033,0.000041345833,0.001935113,0.00022202655,0.0004663961,0.00066174223,0.000705982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003465985,0.00031304228,0.00016471045,0.00081718276,0.0042063324,0.00039531488,0.00008657199,0.00090771803,0.00032544453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100822566,0.00039830938,0.0051338403,0.0018268361,0.0001504755,0.0032413416,0.20837301,0.00050208386,0.0018525708,0.63296324,0.036547095,0.10891037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022099401,0.00005033477,0.004388091,0.00037368975,0.00084652327,0.00015856599,0.053819776,0.00019037981,0.00062351825,0.0060478067,0.93285745,0.00042289225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010740403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004168904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8963103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065817946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012864165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202818119","doi":"","title":"Saskatoon charging and disposition patterns under section 213 of the Criminal Code of Canada .","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Disposition; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Criminal law; Psychology; Programming language; Operating system; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019383183411572285,"score_gpt":0.2882874916357407,"score_spread":0.2689043082241684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202818119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746012,0.000096491225,0.000046824298,0.00037291012,0.0007870523,0.00014717656,0.000023897961,0.0000050971857,0.023919316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98512095,0.000056292887,0.000008905928,0.00006310804,0.000054797718,0.0000039396155,0.000025449935,0.0000063551,0.014660189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904686,0.00009753339,0.00018668026,0.00013730208,0.0003973721,0.00013423129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994987,0.0000590895,0.00019639097,0.00008956694,0.0001170285,0.00003920173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020497975,0.00008803379,0.00014011386,0.000026115535,0.00026628256,0.000018307435,0.00009962103,0.00010007051,0.00013907887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003169115,0.000068851085,0.000042826265,0.00008851479,0.00005842306,0.00008957143,0.0000067195033,0.00010400775,1.2654186e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000937728,0.0006072233,0.11090153,0.013358063,0.0004005299,0.000017009123,0.25067374,0.0003578248,0.04159157,0.5220666,0.03469696,0.024391199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031877353,0.00014754996,0.5905127,0.0019786847,0.0006152423,0.0000059138392,0.36793375,0.000052392872,0.028064324,0.0015564067,0.008182598,0.00063170755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8290116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99484277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5205102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012055263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005740311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28076658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203526704","doi":"","title":"The Boundaries of Judicial Review Since Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Wall","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Ambiguity; Political science; Criticism; Judicial review; High Court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017249331416854547,"score_gpt":0.3126693933389262,"score_spread":0.29542006192207165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203526704","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17865215,0.67443943,0.0012749557,0.13356945,0.0014477994,0.0004068643,0.0000056546105,0.000035789348,0.010167878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.800559,0.19834854,0.00002130794,0.00010864688,0.00015515932,0.0000016346128,9.1962625e-7,0.000004450686,0.0008003732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792945,0.00029413163,0.00037458804,0.00010222324,0.0005157605,0.0007838283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859536,0.0002535349,0.0003579411,0.0001288251,0.00062133645,0.000043020245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029892845,0.00007371638,0.00021476681,0.00001840804,0.0009840744,0.00009421609,0.00029584244,0.00004309381,0.00004036104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001219614,0.00005466448,0.00011301307,0.00028917188,0.0007607359,0.00023919532,0.00002705831,0.00045962722,0.0000037077587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026183332,0.000027451777,0.0002961157,0.000076940305,0.00004887054,0.0000019731317,0.0007302482,8.8684095e-7,0.0002442747,0.983089,0.00056417094,0.014893874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029132605,0.00024616398,0.00054033217,0.0013889642,0.00023736179,0.00011048089,0.0103836255,0.000002726325,0.002175273,0.5428779,0.44156715,0.00017868287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014121723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04219879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6219068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002553291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009652556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203861865","doi":"10.29173/wclawr56","title":"Causes of Wrongful Conviction and the Challenges Involved in Convincing Courts to Reopen Cases of Wrongful Conviction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08898005804125378,"score_gpt":0.3540589190423354,"score_spread":0.2650788610010816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203861865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44837776,0.3947452,0.00015473562,0.118708014,0.0024534834,0.0056486945,0.00006525757,0.00016601216,0.029680848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83925086,0.158498,0.000035211637,0.0014652984,0.00016278708,0.00012304306,0.000008279259,0.000022099275,0.00043441146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952183,0.0019824489,0.0011221586,0.0005340284,0.00070760556,0.00043550512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960176,0.0014779537,0.0006393131,0.00070591585,0.0009989464,0.00016029362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004663867,0.00030857624,0.0009902031,0.000081409285,0.00058802654,0.00007960719,0.00043667853,0.00015947447,0.00046405985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001794645,0.00022083685,0.00016683465,0.0008366317,0.0013117236,0.0005310116,0.00020636362,0.00033611688,0.000036707283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006144185,0.00026284056,0.0027100178,0.004940705,0.0002548438,0.0000497778,0.021755964,0.0000926323,0.0010067297,0.9531432,0.00325651,0.0119123645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029132378,0.00047179783,0.010997591,0.014900988,0.00129643,0.00019513948,0.03667118,0.00012068862,0.0037933986,0.0032024337,0.92448103,0.0009561013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02556356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07707122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94994074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019156796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035907284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204229003","doi":"","title":"The Difficult Road to Accountability: A Study on Complaints Mechanisms to Investigate and Address Victims’ Rights Violations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Accountability; Criminal justice; Political science; Law enforcement; Economic Justice; Human rights; Criminology; Empirical research; Public relations; Law; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04114426501647765,"score_gpt":0.3612321858558445,"score_spread":0.3200879208393668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204229003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823772,0.00005701829,0.00037407826,0.014418233,0.00029638704,0.00058627815,0.0000025114555,0.000022410391,0.0018658943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880147,0.000082911916,0.00002816242,0.00019950945,0.00022241601,0.000024578289,2.2676848e-7,0.000007797112,0.0006329479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974353,0.00025175055,0.00021048989,0.00025718226,0.00053457264,0.0013107592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988629,0.00016312201,0.0001337629,0.0003511013,0.00018302597,0.00030606153],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033436527,0.00013275196,0.00015379826,0.00004953855,0.0089822095,0.00088810106,0.0007808861,0.00004589261,0.0000110301025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006472812,0.00008779815,0.000042246014,0.00011186784,0.00018221096,0.0002943666,0.00011919873,0.00070288725,0.000060152648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002754911,0.00030536045,0.0069225575,0.0000026233859,0.0001447254,0.000009731122,0.03795253,0.00003509365,0.0005472882,0.9289567,0.0004289361,0.024418954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008563322,0.0021944826,0.1900541,0.00013126989,0.00012382404,0.000052030526,0.08784881,0.00003955137,0.000110528614,0.69001156,0.028032308,0.0005451712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008883329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32882285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31993952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005687389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055843114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205870016","doi":"10.26108/0tfs-g965","title":"Has the application of section 217.1 of the Criminal Code succeeded in remedying the deficiencies in Canadian criminal law at the time of the Westray disaster?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AcadiaU-DEV","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Criminal code; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Criminal investigation; Criminal procedure; Computer science","score_opus":0.05709864995360307,"score_gpt":0.29449737465743087,"score_spread":0.23739872470382778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205870016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494898,0.00018359539,0.000009600892,0.043462943,0.000113757655,0.0005714748,0.000020903653,0.0000063968832,0.0061415676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.00002462188,0.0000064182664,0.0010041439,0.00009526151,0.00003007058,0.0000012771611,0.000008094608,0.00011269123],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802995,0.00047092492,0.00039595575,0.00020787898,0.0005381151,0.00035720016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986579,0.0005358624,0.00026345262,0.00038402257,0.00008659117,0.00007219245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015369479,0.000119054814,0.00017329639,0.000030742318,0.00088914967,0.000043735225,0.0012273537,0.00009705575,0.00003957515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045268188,0.00005513462,0.00011048878,0.0007339299,0.0018919344,0.00014116264,0.00013832968,0.00033092118,0.000007659436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020387072,0.00010474888,0.09739875,0.0002230574,0.000033061246,0.0000023108337,0.65952027,0.0023920021,0.03557586,0.19728918,0.0023722635,0.004884641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005341232,0.00017601185,0.63249457,0.00039208573,0.0003840613,0.000016975482,0.25038365,0.0029878872,0.025769316,0.003622126,0.08277636,0.00046281723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6230396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91724396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5350958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002069297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047876974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6970911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205894304","doi":"10.7202/1092012ar","title":"Why De Minimis is a Defence: A Reply to Professor Coughlan","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Supreme court; Statutory law; Harm; Legislature; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054853185311162345,"score_gpt":0.35023954790170503,"score_spread":0.2953863625905427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205894304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18826449,0.00044514006,0.00014967022,0.47397584,0.002443884,0.00071166235,0.00015968047,0.0001710051,0.3336786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94778395,0.000044232424,0.0010677222,0.048512653,0.00037109587,0.000041528132,6.0401015e-7,0.00001435399,0.0021638589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978045,0.00038487863,0.00024826647,0.00021166122,0.00080780196,0.00054286415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990745,0.00011299642,0.00011864546,0.00016658734,0.00012616346,0.00040107648],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018946719,0.000094806834,0.0001486492,0.00004313952,0.010684853,0.0001208765,0.00055485504,0.000035043427,0.0024464824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021859707,0.00009759923,0.00011473233,0.0003165275,0.0001116934,0.00021740932,0.00015312339,0.00042558435,0.00005713467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002727485,0.00026085004,0.0017800223,0.000027477785,0.000056460623,0.0006316822,0.04565399,0.0000799897,0.00038000286,0.23300049,0.71096563,0.0068906834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013000947,0.00015783373,0.00010711274,0.000026829803,0.000021237809,0.00018833604,0.01641015,0.000006069456,0.0001610869,0.0021475921,0.98050064,0.00014313262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014391528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025761092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75951946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000427503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008440325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206254426","doi":"","title":"L'évolution et la structuration des principes directeurs de la procédure civile du Québec, 1867-2016","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.008327271605339583,"score_gpt":0.22452403650902222,"score_spread":0.21619676490368264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206254426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8470088,0.0044887336,0.00028697352,0.007843026,0.0007660776,0.00044988914,0.000044845987,0.00024763405,0.13886397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008422,0.010707066,0.00034620982,0.00011464624,0.00023611725,0.0000014006758,0.000022579916,0.00004126676,0.08768855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963293,0.0013905792,0.00023027234,0.00068428833,0.0006119741,0.0007535593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976472,0.0008929657,0.00031799014,0.00036635774,0.00035949817,0.00041598346],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008860957,0.0004244895,0.00041572607,0.00023892065,0.001221454,0.00018569228,0.00078258367,0.0005335457,0.0005101125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018986226,0.0004974096,0.00030036355,0.0008605558,0.0013878123,0.001840746,0.00032579247,0.00055519445,0.0002093314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086332246,0.0004019546,0.21442713,0.00058445754,0.00030688147,0.00074645993,0.16373016,0.0010210141,0.028073363,0.46924862,0.008314257,0.11228239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00124729,0.00030616779,0.10383023,0.00062787684,0.00049750245,0.00016070038,0.017832812,0.0005533408,0.0024641943,0.0020362744,0.86964244,0.00080115296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33678198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.294999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8613282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029039986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026574293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206310714","doi":"","title":"Three Strikes and the Interpretative Obligation: Parliamentary Intention and the Ascription of Meaning under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Law; Statutory law; Bill of rights; Statute; Appeal; Political science; Parliament; Legislature; Obligation; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislative history; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.021201402470366,"score_gpt":0.2766731578535902,"score_spread":0.2554717553832242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206310714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7441143,0.008489506,0.021054508,0.2245973,0.00018887613,0.0005319119,0.0000018016791,0.000011865152,0.0010099343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642754,0.0031493711,0.00001712338,0.00021249185,0.00012643587,0.000001511559,3.979489e-7,0.0000027523886,0.000062354855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988417,0.00031497603,0.00020801892,0.0000846245,0.00025765822,0.0002929933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992337,0.00036393054,0.00023968164,0.00005332229,0.000071241855,0.000038108472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021995136,0.000064401705,0.00013437493,0.000016520844,0.00040547067,0.000066580236,0.0001858285,0.000025532992,0.000014521275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011570342,0.00002530089,0.00006351738,0.0001192121,0.00073942094,0.00024632353,0.000033744313,0.0004523026,4.140805e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079338293,0.0000071458057,0.0010301319,0.000004021629,0.00015740578,1.6391812e-7,0.053425435,0.000013620179,0.0001192338,0.9338135,0.00033173838,0.010304203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010179926,0.00014903281,0.0009272158,0.000054656863,0.0001288743,0.000012646965,0.0673777,0.0003031411,0.000095326846,0.9294096,0.00048331896,0.000040477677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016366249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04458999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25231326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075906886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032425224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99018383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207397342","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3600350","title":"Le juge et la victime dans le cadre du processus de détermination de la peine (The Judge and the Victim in the Sentencing Process)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0042483526869631005,"score_gpt":0.2818092915531747,"score_spread":0.2775609388662116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207397342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8811664,0.0055622254,0.00084746355,0.097332254,0.00009940498,0.0003105149,9.79677e-7,0.00001147675,0.014669285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905572,0.00629049,0.0000111795525,0.00062273623,0.00032145958,0.00001881062,6.353792e-7,0.00001558608,0.002161908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567086,0.0021620586,0.00024940434,0.00019473079,0.0004102234,0.0013127277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998602,0.0009048593,0.00021387251,0.00012708541,0.00009689892,0.000055314595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015304951,0.00015717723,0.00017533595,0.00004095182,0.0011254292,0.00031916128,0.000622025,0.00012863771,0.00001411059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003082942,0.000093532515,0.00008355413,0.00039468758,0.0007023433,0.0005910494,0.000045617424,0.0020475413,0.000009797308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013532983,0.00014682421,0.012014789,0.00007580282,0.00005390958,0.000022126002,0.1526189,0.0004051104,0.00029547254,0.82320994,0.000074646196,0.010947163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002533398,0.0003093905,0.016553447,0.00036076413,0.00024602434,0.0058269543,0.5555189,0.0049624722,0.00017562446,0.38581106,0.02731859,0.00038334468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0095777325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038631883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43739888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004551952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060780304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209671816","doi":"","title":"‘Mr. Big’ Under Scrutiny: The Right to Silence and Elicited Undercover Confession Evidence in New Zealand","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Suspect; Scrutiny; Appeal; Officer; Law; Silence; Criminology; Political science; High Court; Psychology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07516981061061166,"score_gpt":0.3534094327763857,"score_spread":0.278239622165774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209671816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89417166,0.007488203,0.002344322,0.09318976,0.00043686168,0.00030807627,5.591591e-7,0.000029926588,0.002030644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498565,0.0049231932,0.000030065537,0.001022415,0.0004781656,0.0000023636662,2.2844414e-7,0.0000095483165,0.008548384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697256,0.00037255767,0.00025134144,0.00023800283,0.0006026835,0.0015628806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988913,0.00036426104,0.00010490771,0.00015158957,0.00012310248,0.00036482952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045450698,0.00013475087,0.00016645451,0.000098109,0.00046730775,0.00022055433,0.00044662636,0.000091719965,0.00003659086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073122204,0.00009005956,0.00004091687,0.0004571548,0.00017046646,0.0004674408,0.000076578865,0.0010083751,0.000043972894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008240183,0.00013548635,0.055414118,0.000014532466,0.000079562225,0.000041454055,0.047707148,0.0004729786,0.0020770517,0.79450667,0.02715462,0.07157233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011958566,0.00065062573,0.013069038,0.0007976022,0.00007049324,0.0002489963,0.06618532,0.00007431714,0.00017417247,0.80396026,0.113032155,0.0005411835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01735442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11821819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10086378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092989317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065739546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209721665","doi":"","title":"Enforcing American Letters of Request: The Fickle Charter Guarantee of Evidentiary Immunity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer security; Computer science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.029740365611308998,"score_gpt":0.3185562827631956,"score_spread":0.2888159171518866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209721665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98779696,0.0021671855,0.0007818353,0.0073920786,0.0001820136,0.000085973785,8.475854e-7,0.000009491891,0.0015836144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686635,0.002398628,0.000032255393,0.00014474292,0.00021371925,0.0000014504926,3.934683e-7,0.0000068657205,0.00033557843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977731,0.0003810671,0.00030201982,0.000083340776,0.00050179847,0.0009586745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990938,0.00014442332,0.00035815983,0.00017935199,0.00016736331,0.00005693374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052108727,0.0000805111,0.00018651616,0.000056547506,0.00030197302,0.000033000502,0.0005517325,0.000025998283,0.000019190644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003043032,0.000058216134,0.00012235223,0.00024047928,0.0005679952,0.00032906965,0.00003847749,0.00075887854,0.000007491464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070911855,0.00028223245,0.028364884,0.000058289734,0.00058473274,0.00001745353,0.14417933,0.00027898265,0.022438554,0.70247203,0.0063204705,0.094293945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001754956,0.0025326107,0.011737882,0.0006820787,0.0005565568,0.0004897177,0.6573383,0.00015306308,0.00534958,0.2699891,0.048456613,0.0009595391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015497631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009864511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.513159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034873452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016033889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99105823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209828805","doi":"","title":"Misspent Youth: The (Mis)application of the Youth Criminal Justice Act by the Criminal Code Review Boards of British Columbia and Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal code; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal procedure; Criminal law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06440637157402879,"score_gpt":0.33003962505944456,"score_spread":0.2656332534854158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209828805","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046156727,0.8903429,0.000031369756,0.01365865,0.00033255407,0.0030664152,0.00063482043,0.000027254255,0.045749314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.698748,0.29658204,0.000011667505,0.0044063823,0.00008991852,0.000027608958,0.00002789435,0.000010287749,0.00009624718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977707,0.00027176642,0.00073012203,0.000288124,0.00068882364,0.00025045653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851745,0.00010534057,0.0006188911,0.000379645,0.00023891068,0.0001397714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015925505,0.00014956755,0.0005493631,0.0000032611067,0.00050657487,0.00006424272,0.0006610431,0.00004965129,0.000050607046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012742844,0.00009841608,0.00020175465,0.00019255035,0.0012937279,0.00016143438,0.00014918363,0.00028062635,0.0000014288818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268395,0.00052406895,0.0009068682,0.22946467,0.00017330315,0.0000020709292,0.088923775,3.4307584e-7,0.00007473727,0.34251755,0.032276414,0.30500937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017571155,0.0001230688,0.0005901409,0.024136342,0.003007803,0.000008919537,0.0070089623,0.000002761222,0.000027506921,0.00012807474,0.964613,0.00017768439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4059967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4101692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9323366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069219095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017529608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6005937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210365955","doi":"","title":"Accommodating the Unknown: Balancing Employee Human Rights with the Employer Duty to Ensure Safety: A Dialogue on Stewart v Elk Valley and the Cannabis Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Adjudication; Supreme court; Prima facie; Law; Legalization; Political science; Jurisprudence; Corporation; Reasonable suspicion","score_opus":0.017024600603596885,"score_gpt":0.27782303039138534,"score_spread":0.26079842978778844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210365955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71492076,0.0005329848,0.00030195134,0.2800042,0.000101424484,0.0005483485,0.0000027437088,0.0000452529,0.0035423078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995212,0.00020001722,0.000010771461,0.0028982554,0.0009927588,0.000017296268,9.115742e-7,0.000020256595,0.0006477045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963555,0.00087249716,0.00026430373,0.00027530186,0.0006826549,0.0015497844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877125,0.00051686313,0.00017073457,0.00024096157,0.000114808216,0.00018539547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043712296,0.00021049651,0.0002562016,0.000026346976,0.005340371,0.00036731374,0.00084361195,0.0000628873,0.000027309143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026419418,0.000087748784,0.00010886031,0.00032108353,0.00040018733,0.00020879901,0.00010504438,0.0019012768,0.00001543896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013498134,0.000042353626,0.0061114347,0.0000127336025,0.00037917902,0.000021144439,0.093209,0.00035350118,0.00014678862,0.8826215,0.0075578336,0.008194685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049131447,0.0038870608,0.035346657,0.00045670202,0.0007865903,0.0003996459,0.08596023,0.00009623363,0.00015555564,0.14631073,0.7202141,0.001473299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076870313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25088984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7363108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003704487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093778316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211161288","doi":"","title":"Can PIPEDA ‘Face’ the Challenge? An Analysis of the Adequacy of Canada’s Private Sector Privacy Legislation against Facial Recognition Technology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Face (sociological concept); Business; Private sector; Internet privacy; Facial recognition system; Computer security; Law; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Pattern recognition (psychology); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.044178919319240104,"score_gpt":0.2799029223704864,"score_spread":0.2357240030512463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211161288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92496055,0.00013246266,0.000044279535,0.06936412,0.00016168687,0.0003530954,0.00009409962,0.00004283088,0.004846839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988941,0.00007715533,0.00005650148,0.00069976953,0.00016123257,0.000013360439,0.000016798756,0.000008793793,0.000072303264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981941,0.00029515152,0.00036374832,0.0002811147,0.0005777385,0.00028815714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988579,0.0001049891,0.0003229719,0.00039074232,0.0001827879,0.0001405888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004447633,0.00012593242,0.00028123913,0.000060933868,0.00056034623,0.00003634353,0.000750184,0.00012291383,0.00019986332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063501816,0.00009007361,0.00012512108,0.0010964976,0.0003995206,0.00023471628,0.000104296436,0.00026379517,0.0000034535308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006658188,0.0006779869,0.12534392,0.00042157905,0.002591703,0.00003688011,0.18614203,0.0067574973,0.033418,0.546517,0.004717068,0.09271053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020011754,0.00089658494,0.12589647,0.00046080016,0.0038532796,0.0000022701447,0.07783077,0.0052101747,0.035437297,0.026315788,0.72004586,0.0020495455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4480674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9499672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71532875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014541238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078631996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.555608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212222693","doi":"","title":"Litigating Informer Privilege Under Section 37 of the Canada Evidence Act: A Critique of R. v. Basi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Law; Legislative history; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Section (typography); Jurisdiction; Statutory interpretation; Legislature; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; History","score_opus":0.023604098534780658,"score_gpt":0.30557749772724135,"score_spread":0.28197339919246067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212222693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98696023,0.0027210342,0.00049705995,0.0054276227,0.00060972996,0.00012226617,0.0000013166095,0.000006358389,0.003654386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997445,0.0012780258,0.000019636087,0.00015201962,0.00044960782,0.0000020803157,1.07400275e-7,0.0000056588824,0.00064788293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976829,0.00019887106,0.0002894144,0.00006620356,0.00056378794,0.001198806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906033,0.00026709284,0.0002780802,0.000110676,0.00019249966,0.000091309164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029589674,0.00007596534,0.00012326374,0.000022371165,0.00041688143,0.000019449597,0.00031150514,0.000058763617,0.000053145992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080300146,0.00005643785,0.00008325278,0.00023598073,0.000156492,0.00072284165,0.000033856573,0.0008021607,7.2732627e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044357566,0.000059703267,0.11065413,0.00008200209,0.00008185594,4.4433918e-7,0.00946744,0.000059029662,0.0038108453,0.8652624,0.0009369648,0.009540826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001078872,0.000909569,0.30980077,0.0040473207,0.0005439356,0.0007520704,0.30512938,0.00007188952,0.032608256,0.23529278,0.10836438,0.0014008003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4584041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9123204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62996966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011456541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01010767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214089832","doi":"10.7202/1107728ar","title":"INTEGRITY, DIGNITY AND THE ACT RESPECTING INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES: CAN THE ACT PROVIDE MORE APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION FOR SEXUAL HARASSMENT VICTIMS?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Harassment; Compensation (psychology); Damages; Law; Political science; Commission; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037141312389285794,"score_gpt":0.29158519994193005,"score_spread":0.25444388755264424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214089832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906908,0.00006645442,0.00010596452,0.0062203594,0.00005415001,0.0007820171,0.000030358095,0.000031632975,0.00201823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704385,0.00009258426,0.000089317444,0.00017567731,0.0003142869,0.000014770172,0.000015288548,0.000007874631,0.0022463666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988934,0.0002285423,0.00013896798,0.00023831445,0.00023581077,0.00026496383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989434,0.00062825996,0.00009678577,0.00013710378,0.00006175734,0.00013268598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085292646,0.00010785955,0.00014653854,0.000031707805,0.0014352599,0.00019347612,0.00026225057,0.00010011242,0.00006177858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003221735,0.000085083426,0.00005377462,0.00011779864,0.00032097465,0.00023659704,0.00008535866,0.00023643965,0.0000016804853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076332814,0.00017436511,0.61268544,0.0002109409,0.0002608942,0.000044746743,0.09260667,0.00043232687,0.00021853487,0.0839462,0.0017558399,0.20003077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007580794,0.00030430322,0.8189302,0.00042495344,0.0009351874,0.000065483284,0.04396409,0.0070752096,0.00016229492,0.017651549,0.1021479,0.00075802166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007959127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015838409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20624478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008884201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003261801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214689974","doi":"","title":"Paroles de déraison et paroles de dérision : les excès de langage à l’épreuve du droit criminel canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1588344370771158,"score_gpt":0.365102848786491,"score_spread":0.2062684117093752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214689974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89612937,0.0033218754,0.0010141822,0.03494124,0.00047632196,0.00017619054,0.000029756724,0.0001285908,0.063782476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699206,0.0014379233,0.0020432326,0.0017387511,0.00067362795,0.000022168715,0.000008722097,0.00003191047,0.024123067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962947,0.0010965172,0.00035119755,0.00044933756,0.0005292848,0.0012789659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764735,0.00065184315,0.00011683692,0.00030478957,0.00017834925,0.0011008551],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004030204,0.00029976407,0.00035011995,0.00007615423,0.00058412744,0.00021841045,0.00064276165,0.00046938425,0.00047272182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015148007,0.00029935708,0.00015541418,0.00025410985,0.00051028613,0.0005390253,0.00015278968,0.0005079915,0.00019535855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017027804,0.00042130283,0.15858696,0.00021766097,0.00007939724,0.000583882,0.23413092,0.00079935987,0.0010183838,0.33854213,0.20511632,0.060333423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008347631,0.00053512835,0.072218485,0.0006290542,0.0004064241,0.00019166504,0.20581368,0.006441971,0.0019205472,0.049540393,0.6602445,0.0012233848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70730984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7270993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4551282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012325043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014135512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214765505","doi":"","title":"Section 24(2) in the Trial Courts: An Empirical Analysis of the Legal and Non-legal Determinants of Excluding Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Nova scotia; Law; Political science; Ideology; Empirical evidence; Criminal trial; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06111297904677972,"score_gpt":0.3466347057576162,"score_spread":0.2855217267108365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214765505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99647266,0.00017683979,0.000014573155,0.0017184648,0.00040648718,0.00020571162,0.0000112570915,0.0000031183229,0.0009909209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999369,0.00004795229,0.000055460652,0.00030652093,0.00013222614,0.000012649972,0.0000016358451,0.000002715376,0.00007182825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772924,0.00066973374,0.00043980902,0.00025337373,0.00067871786,0.00022915284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986983,0.0006684806,0.00016121699,0.00024695837,0.00014571522,0.00007932363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016671462,0.00009514339,0.00030691974,0.00006656436,0.00028306566,0.00007857229,0.0003415377,0.00006768706,0.000046674617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001308643,0.00006865266,0.00008807001,0.0011624065,0.00035243572,0.0005635695,0.0000640125,0.00023157355,2.8397056e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001210315,0.00017124391,0.9739298,0.000054018277,0.00007118275,0.00012994414,0.003920881,0.0013076578,0.0008421293,0.017430767,0.0003187237,0.0006133148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031755578,0.00015815138,0.9647788,0.0005579379,0.00046440514,0.000017623704,0.01741927,0.001789426,0.00075027853,0.000593397,0.009966644,0.00032852942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94418144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054604996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033630332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039056875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6928522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214953611","doi":"","title":"Manitoba Law Journal Criminal Law Edition (Robson Crim) 41(4) 2018","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06552420480471455,"score_gpt":0.3225223531526971,"score_spread":0.25699814834798257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214953611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28355175,0.0012773431,0.0022839908,0.013853387,0.02822623,0.00059287355,0.000035860376,0.00032968854,0.66984886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594065,0.00034000908,0.0014038611,0.0036411018,0.034940694,0.000006863993,0.0000049718315,0.000055557655,0.0002004272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946426,0.00071616034,0.000905104,0.00045939063,0.0018909905,0.0013857179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674404,0.0002190151,0.00059290294,0.00037363026,0.0011279687,0.000942439],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003034546,0.00042323483,0.00045931205,0.00013662691,0.0115615735,0.0024334448,0.0012063269,0.0003272008,0.0021694195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017901933,0.00039102067,0.00038708444,0.0002645818,0.0026624543,0.0025907988,0.00015889504,0.0013904395,0.0013676772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028422778,0.00028580165,0.00023474426,0.00004753297,0.00009527836,0.0007013829,0.004816895,0.000005217863,0.00055004784,0.87505764,0.10160491,0.016316302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070809847,0.00078971026,0.0005767516,0.00035557782,0.00030555928,0.002549741,0.086322,0.000012218114,0.0012294442,0.062642254,0.8438702,0.00063840894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17262313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85497427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8124154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008694753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022981415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215317100","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v1i1.134","title":"Privatization of Law Enforcement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Accountability; Discretion; Law enforcement; Community policing; Public administration; Democracy; Enforcement; Political science; Police brutality; Public relations; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.24856146540022492,"score_gpt":0.47811207115600374,"score_spread":0.22955060575577882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215317100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03635889,0.00018539981,0.00003141906,0.008184327,0.00013764067,0.00020674933,0.000019082354,0.0000368897,0.9548396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98811865,0.00036841456,0.000370754,0.00007425441,0.000058722562,0.000013200038,0.000007170002,0.0000045250436,0.010984335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824375,0.00031013414,0.00014400629,0.00014300711,0.0008663488,0.0002927804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987853,0.00018105429,0.00002725413,0.00017185463,0.00075536687,0.000079131416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001293615,0.000042599047,0.000089587345,0.000037328035,0.0009204562,0.000049097354,0.00017572335,0.000044056014,0.0008922005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009205395,0.000041676052,0.000029767434,0.0004107575,0.00060546625,0.00036472158,0.0001317518,0.00010246662,0.000032470907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019212519,0.000024951409,0.00010548153,0.00004421885,0.000004916571,0.000008380215,0.0021073164,0.0000056845106,0.003069095,0.992553,0.00077565626,0.0012820805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004871059,0.000055051118,0.00012295894,0.000042190488,0.0000021765238,5.4927807e-7,0.0052445843,0.0000030075025,0.047921106,0.015125725,0.93138754,0.00004637041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006598374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100086555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008210519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016015455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338309623","doi":"10.29173/mlj826","title":"The “Great Writ” Reinvigorated? Habeas Corpus in Contemporary Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Writ; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Charter; Sociology; History; Constitution","score_opus":0.07248617957876874,"score_gpt":0.2967868044174128,"score_spread":0.22430062483864405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338309623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73252463,0.010966557,0.000013280371,0.029025031,0.004838542,0.00028730408,0.0000064375004,0.00003647644,0.22230174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973612,0.00025846486,0.000020630223,0.0007321026,0.0011534507,0.0000038953453,7.519646e-7,0.000008913925,0.0004606197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981109,0.00036229848,0.00028685323,0.00009277834,0.00056715304,0.00058002054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.0002721482,0.00013208123,0.0001321783,0.00008852428,0.00031666917],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017500063,0.00010409066,0.00013333617,0.000020507736,0.002115486,0.00028947755,0.0003980736,0.000059344926,0.00007265648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014759735,0.00007458997,0.000045925342,0.00016152965,0.00027743206,0.00054976076,0.00004077992,0.00039074352,0.000029255307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018708537,0.00010735077,0.35466957,0.000017477465,0.000053411157,0.00076939695,0.005107136,0.000014046091,0.000057169287,0.39220923,0.21132128,0.03548684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001573543,0.000019493504,0.011258283,0.00004593933,0.000007820963,0.00007556131,0.026964312,0.000003147422,0.00004243851,0.0018303511,0.95946735,0.00012793424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98330224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74814606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049970066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000700666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W340801201","doi":"","title":"Strike Laws, Not Children.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phi Delta Kappan","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Wife; Girl; Brother; Sociology; Officer; Economic Justice; Daughter; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.035353907764039925,"score_gpt":0.3212412113292659,"score_spread":0.285887303565226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W340801201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82301474,0.00023804551,0.00001623431,0.008253873,0.00015086093,0.00018318777,0.000023835286,0.00016091506,0.16795829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907802,0.00028475825,0.00012375572,0.0006654668,0.0005500127,0.00000686985,0.000009568142,0.000008960937,0.0075704176],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.000075198266,0.00014152563,0.00022159173,0.0003571978,0.00036079038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951273,0.00006476941,0.000028685301,0.000196003,0.00003381959,0.00016397031],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034105696,0.00009247585,0.00011670141,0.00002560288,0.00049953785,0.0000928393,0.00034052262,0.00006759442,0.0045956345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057998943,0.000090293,0.00006667156,0.00019396255,0.00020067654,0.0002305886,0.000021680813,0.000112805996,0.0010456982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016333724,0.0003063051,0.01917437,0.000019780078,0.0000621242,0.000033976343,0.015853101,0.000099683064,0.00019494435,0.158052,0.088706315,0.71733403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001979026,0.00004043719,0.02112548,0.000022428623,0.000029179462,0.000004300452,0.00053126307,0.0000235658,0.00016743153,0.0017431196,0.9758658,0.00024909797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009859862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00418266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88715947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003814755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007416848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343696641","doi":"","title":"Proceeding with Precaution: Environmental Principles as Interpretive Tools in Application for Pre-Trial Injunctions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02222540161658648,"score_gpt":0.33095232665803914,"score_spread":0.30872692504145266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343696641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95583063,0.0003140375,0.033219833,0.0042796526,0.00011929087,0.0015589651,0.0000028809054,0.00003560564,0.004639115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979605,0.00036327157,0.00014983559,0.000043608485,0.00046346214,0.00009270662,0.0000029889945,0.0000056191725,0.00091802067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848425,0.00004405276,0.0001948194,0.00017480372,0.00025020045,0.00085184467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965245,0.000073510826,0.00012843807,0.000055205364,0.000030400506,0.000060027305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001199626,0.00008715848,0.00009978444,0.000063471125,0.0004635364,0.00008960307,0.00017592995,0.00005463487,0.000016115899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013717511,0.00007634801,0.000049849234,0.00013029769,0.000084164734,0.00057016744,0.000009904576,0.0004933994,0.000006409441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00846957,0.00029889846,0.0025662412,0.0000045271913,0.000039793496,6.291244e-7,0.010353511,0.00013520129,0.0008014949,0.9187363,0.000025263696,0.058568563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014449791,0.0127169555,0.013163648,0.0004215168,0.00022232872,0.0002027433,0.11324884,0.00048412837,0.0007110973,0.7852758,0.058139272,0.00096384366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014898342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024769749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13346048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001449146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013202796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37894663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344466164","doi":"10.71781/2252","title":"La détention à des fins d'enquête en droit criminel canadien et son impact sur les droits constitutionnels","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01641044909972117,"score_gpt":0.23686507619957303,"score_spread":0.22045462709985186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344466164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91135,0.013978737,0.00038558437,0.00046537092,0.0011838457,0.0004888265,0.00022592556,0.00013870887,0.071782984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485311,0.005710998,0.0002977582,0.000053186173,0.0002724265,0.000030306863,0.0005264936,0.000038098562,0.044539638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575526,0.000781434,0.0006009925,0.00086435606,0.0010921466,0.0009057991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703985,0.0005691278,0.00056560204,0.00035781128,0.0007155088,0.00075207226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006921278,0.0006669692,0.00062716095,0.00038399402,0.015163137,0.00015369682,0.0006835276,0.0009622386,0.00021020886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045220458,0.0007905508,0.00071041594,0.0006135568,0.0022763512,0.0014170083,0.00013349482,0.0007956654,0.00012347518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012284652,0.00076300855,0.09231242,0.00072587957,0.0008820924,0.009197194,0.39750615,0.009746721,0.00661602,0.4605232,0.0019702648,0.018528594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021282318,0.0005239376,0.61869264,0.0030510614,0.0017504871,0.0052157547,0.23772702,0.0017742128,0.0019885572,0.002653098,0.122003704,0.0024913338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8437603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68482697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015497797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005962645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W357905171","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17007412.v1","title":"Non-disclosure of information in the prosecution of preventive detention regimes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certificate; Order (exchange); Terrorism; Political science; Kingdom; Law; Control (management); Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013907541134761513,"score_gpt":0.3146600912582378,"score_spread":0.3007525501234763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W357905171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8511682,0.00007364846,0.00005029494,0.00019027204,0.00020137458,0.00093324104,0.000003962112,0.0000068968197,0.14737207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308914,0.00012729251,0.000072528965,0.000008947071,0.000026937056,0.0000554276,0.00017889499,0.000002332335,0.0064384714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989322,0.00010557825,0.00035950058,0.00007134825,0.00043031026,0.0001010697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990875,0.000059974227,0.0004514537,0.00010502272,0.0002828761,0.000013167467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007287545,0.00007417269,0.00014374244,0.000101060206,0.00007694165,0.00003092007,0.00021270903,0.00016269532,0.00009621252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014311564,0.000051918767,0.00007972116,0.00022985134,0.00006828879,0.0007658275,0.0000061585333,0.00009935494,0.000014560253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031694138,0.00034304184,0.004932762,0.0030253662,0.00006348135,6.710673e-7,0.61483264,0.000020782156,0.0018160674,0.31705686,0.013231442,0.044359934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004159025,0.0002993424,0.34335002,0.002036152,0.00019423533,5.0413394e-7,0.6175258,0.00008177903,0.0099505335,0.016810017,0.008958391,0.00037732534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012295698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010194019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33841726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030931016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015015397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36030072","doi":"10.1016/j.beha.2022.101349","title":"De Nederlandse Grondwet geëvalueerd; anker- of verdwijnpunt?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.3455723197882213,"score_gpt":0.6277819884860828,"score_spread":0.2822096686978615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36030072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6332914,0.001485828,0.00027568743,0.16826043,0.0005400397,0.00071418984,0.000006375873,0.000096348616,0.19532971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923164,0.0026655514,0.0017758026,0.0011606172,0.00042776685,0.000015470927,0.0000026399775,0.000011705368,0.001624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99035436,0.005929221,0.00086911884,0.0005035126,0.0012478484,0.0010959583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98051035,0.017094346,0.0002894885,0.00054662337,0.0010176395,0.00054155174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021165527,0.0001365052,0.0005887329,0.00014954015,0.000627911,0.000118610275,0.0008962342,0.00045036626,0.00041841366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0716586,0.00012871128,0.00018213979,0.00060147507,0.0020122542,0.00079575257,0.00016887835,0.0012965185,0.00053238054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018291959,0.0030573606,0.01245021,0.00008488877,0.00007534862,0.0018338814,0.0064061102,0.0000030708163,0.00018637328,0.87171763,0.049995225,0.05236068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007264715,0.002874365,0.0031630131,0.00012693807,0.00010009932,0.00029571046,0.012823331,0.00006081029,0.00010573402,0.04956049,0.92992115,0.00024187988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005515491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013048059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011882072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016054453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9361612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.034599470662853536,"score_gpt":0.34732308704007686,"score_spread":0.31272361637722335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36457722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98431396,0.0015463283,0.000008603534,0.002859245,0.00016384452,0.000121573794,0.000003860693,0.000003919114,0.010978638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979374,0.001636006,0.000076245786,0.000102410246,0.00013625028,0.0000034753912,2.037528e-7,0.0000033465953,0.00010466787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882823,0.00010829205,0.00020969273,0.000066550994,0.00034393338,0.000443314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986652,0.00031305998,0.000107873624,0.000045050052,0.00028555203,0.00058324204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032051255,0.00006252075,0.00009135505,0.00007513841,0.00092669716,0.00011541849,0.0001302127,0.000058023074,0.000026381356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010451238,0.000047086705,0.000037089732,0.00024537827,0.00048136205,0.00054388255,0.0000069702082,0.00024404645,0.000002142842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025900907,0.000030680723,0.80180836,0.000007006232,0.000011679339,0.0000027686806,0.05284615,3.4291395e-7,0.000022291175,0.14167665,0.0029806306,0.00058751716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030709663,0.00012384426,0.6451995,0.00011048491,0.00007121562,0.00024146511,0.13223109,0.000028893686,0.00007107229,0.030387204,0.19099525,0.00023291989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12176014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38923672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26747656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008656852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008139289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88408816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W368270615","doi":"","title":"The Law of Government Ethics: Federal, Ontario and British Columbia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Public administration; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02035021057703492,"score_gpt":0.2942341455171852,"score_spread":0.2738839349401503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W368270615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029702645,0.004456318,0.000012045092,0.027397266,0.0021991846,0.0003107595,0.000019568839,0.000024459361,0.93587774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035002038,0.010768162,0.000035296656,0.0034391736,0.0002922077,0.000018059496,0.000008582956,0.000010817356,0.9504257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801105,0.00036523366,0.00030254517,0.00030591915,0.00066968135,0.00034555202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716496,0.0022300214,0.00015259994,0.00014055026,0.00006922823,0.00024263487],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022821266,0.00010221043,0.0003815621,0.0000060405478,0.001122348,0.00010528076,0.00032036402,0.0019576324,0.0033204504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011783567,0.00011003393,0.000047260964,0.000017149021,0.009148115,0.000034140674,0.00021854711,0.0019836293,0.0000063529583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006601835,0.000072285155,0.011018998,0.00010759924,0.00012975563,0.00050918234,0.008932112,6.826506e-9,0.000001809206,0.8448489,0.08342873,0.05088465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018053208,0.000147859,0.0020218256,0.00007071886,0.000046886256,0.00018706615,0.00024979693,2.7727808e-7,2.9018986e-7,0.12585102,0.87113917,0.00010458619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79883987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99917763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7877104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010291993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013375481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W39443587","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-75077-x","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud. \"Code civil du Québec annoté\".","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028068561808073086,"score_gpt":0.26206805696058805,"score_spread":0.23399949515251495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W39443587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7498656,0.0012059428,0.0002447107,0.029052185,0.0004269333,0.0002743787,0.000018483346,0.0002932811,0.21861851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98052883,0.0016924854,0.00031923142,0.00067136553,0.0012449557,0.000024488407,0.0000068542276,0.000026366386,0.015485442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981153,0.00014684812,0.00030315993,0.0003988759,0.00037515373,0.00066064874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987069,0.00033604584,0.00012349742,0.00038929147,0.00013046052,0.00031380774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064000627,0.00013999266,0.0002839075,0.00007276057,0.0008551975,0.00008054815,0.00054511736,0.00016759173,0.0010287882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009175889,0.00019969634,0.0001819756,0.0003567128,0.00044747186,0.00033305597,0.00007163786,0.00023888682,0.00074593205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027445157,0.0007140103,0.21229,0.00045571962,0.00012865853,0.0028455285,0.13877867,0.0003102233,0.0046816063,0.118969254,0.49592865,0.024623232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031961346,0.000114275674,0.006931028,0.00020328596,0.000060798055,0.00014520518,0.0027708139,0.00022583564,0.0006422395,0.006037498,0.9819763,0.000573118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07434319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27585006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48604766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047890903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064415694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40392389","doi":"","title":"Vancouver Area Community Corrections and Aboriginal Justice: A Review of Aboriginal Federal Offenders and Sentencing Alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07134317181790664,"score_gpt":0.3536987596419658,"score_spread":0.2823555878240591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40392389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040429443,0.98525065,0.000059883685,0.00006368816,0.0007187128,0.00048509054,0.00014724706,0.000045952605,0.012824494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093818025,0.99701136,0.00006965478,0.00005516516,0.00013684564,0.0000022890933,0.00003459855,0.000015648462,0.001736252],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976972,0.00096943957,0.00030075273,0.00029470105,0.00035709268,0.00038083573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812573,0.0006674335,0.00043239104,0.00026081063,0.00022099695,0.0002926302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067679456,0.0003237979,0.0009966999,0.00026451683,0.001243009,0.000051635277,0.00043050922,0.00019009804,0.00020286789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011129163,0.00032290304,0.00021436573,0.00065466727,0.0006284415,0.00062446547,0.000100024095,0.00072754076,0.0000070522087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008752181,0.0004715118,0.026613837,0.26536217,0.0007421106,0.00020156037,0.0027389352,0.0000011421721,9.771138e-8,0.011672014,0.07157003,0.62053907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001169042,0.000037575257,0.00001934251,0.032697216,0.002098839,7.950181e-8,0.03625182,9.949118e-7,2.3082875e-7,0.000018610574,0.9284727,0.00028568463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136278905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3104994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85690266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006418128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40421862","doi":"","title":"Post-Offence Conduct: Investigative Strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; CLARITY; Interrogation; Innocence; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Presumption; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.1528907106846487,"score_gpt":0.3856384865011614,"score_spread":0.23274777581651268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40421862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4555116,0.00010982142,0.00002661512,0.040771063,0.000088328554,0.0001033456,0.0000022702495,0.000089968125,0.503297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764674,0.00002693255,0.0010965377,0.0018617689,0.00023104048,0.0000038109033,8.5680506e-7,0.0000029276155,0.020308753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999247,0.00007212201,0.00009735263,0.00014154993,0.00022200309,0.00021993436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995315,0.00008964737,0.00002814512,0.00008592899,0.00011304687,0.00015170367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029141386,0.00005866725,0.0000694009,0.000017736655,0.00028770158,0.00006946151,0.0001875284,0.000043716627,0.0013813516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023154472,0.00004996661,0.00002693427,0.00011516678,0.00058449054,0.0005144307,0.000018722676,0.000074883494,0.0006448247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000368175,0.000018322813,0.00029364048,0.0000028499262,0.0000031191269,0.0000028448603,0.009445504,0.000012594294,0.004492854,0.9647387,0.008119683,0.012866179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018359233,0.00015715856,0.0057482496,0.00003623634,0.000019686779,0.0000035429787,0.04172843,0.00007175171,0.015753571,0.02566031,0.9102118,0.00042567853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008025009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018679446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045275086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021573942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205402466","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3969982","title":"Denying &amp;amp; Reckoning with Implicit Law: The Case of the City of Toronto v. Ontario (A.G.)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03250534484053531,"score_gpt":0.3137640131478073,"score_spread":0.281258668307272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205402466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97948086,0.0030195278,0.000444818,0.0018193054,0.00012648581,0.000086694556,9.689694e-7,0.000005808575,0.015015556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500245,0.0005943401,0.00015712602,0.00007573927,0.00013024175,0.0000018981813,2.6486452e-7,0.0000072123134,0.0040307376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980332,0.0002763121,0.00025262812,0.00013197528,0.0003425551,0.00096330943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989929,0.0001801052,0.00025310006,0.00026603037,0.00024978124,0.00005806477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002396084,0.00009263355,0.00016722336,0.0000067276437,0.0010733202,0.000061202125,0.00038166734,0.000052001335,0.00024071244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016652141,0.000052944935,0.0001322316,0.00013008801,0.00026631835,0.00024672635,0.00006819133,0.00087497884,0.0000016789536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008976397,0.000065718305,0.020385988,0.000012717707,0.00017129243,0.000037257752,0.03566765,0.000032092972,0.0019272851,0.93578744,0.00010784651,0.0057149604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016827366,0.0005303152,0.014254636,0.0009258641,0.0010385922,0.025700904,0.27100915,0.0000065041004,0.0040256805,0.3979129,0.28191367,0.0009990601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75678736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99891824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5378745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014419901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052191527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9258553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205507244","doi":"10.7202/1027549ar","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Patrice Deslauriers (dir.), Droit à l’égalité et discrimination : Aspects nouveaux, Association Henri Capitant (section québécoise), Montréal, Yvon Blais, 2002, 330 pages, ISBN 2-89451-556-1 Pierre-Claude Lafond, Techniques de repérage des sources documentaires du droit, 2 édition, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2002, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-591-X Andrée Lajoie, Quand les minorités font la loi, Paris, P.U.F., 2002, 217 pages, ISBN 2-13-052330-7 Pierre Laporte, Hélène OuiMET, Code du travail du Québec, Législation, Jurisprudence, Doctrine, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 14 édition, 2001, 852 pages, ISBN 2-89127-547-0 Ouvrage collectif, Le droit à l’égalité : les tribunaux d’arbitrage et le Tribunal des droits de la personne, Montréal, Themis, 2001, 273 pages, ISBN 2-89400-142-8 Jeffrey Talpis, If I am from Grand-Mère, Why Am I Being Sued in Texas?: Responding to Inappropriate Foreign Jurisdiction in Quebec-United States Crossboarder Litigation, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 250 pages, ISBN 2-89400-139-8 Daniel Turp, Le droit de choisir : Essais sur le droit du Québec à disposer de lui-même, Montréal, Thémis, 2001, 996 pages, ISBN 2-89400-158-4 J.-P. VILLAGGI, L’évaluation psychologique dans le contexte légal : Sources et commentaires, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2001, 284 pages, ISBN 2-89451-498-0","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Section (typography); Art; Art history; Cartography; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.011454539894189583,"score_gpt":0.2379682453715552,"score_spread":0.2265137054773656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205507244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57018334,0.3087891,0.04031029,0.051742084,0.0010407895,0.0110554835,0.0070963083,0.0023760372,0.007406562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48574498,0.47444528,0.0039541754,0.0018220597,0.0012334685,0.002217121,0.009475304,0.0010358229,0.020071791],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95767534,0.015664564,0.008002412,0.006376623,0.004579768,0.007701272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97609776,0.007669905,0.006430781,0.0032506278,0.0033623828,0.0031885342],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026330153,0.004925277,0.00566003,0.004016184,0.008094632,0.0048590577,0.0033590526,0.0049922513,0.0008221156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009777802,0.0063428986,0.002092515,0.008266685,0.0036360521,0.00845259,0.0007714875,0.006222964,0.00006823226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004775257,0.008980555,0.0982187,0.0015874181,0.0018775132,0.0018947467,0.030298576,0.01820784,0.0067356154,0.0060779112,0.8137389,0.007606985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02584951,0.0025549864,0.1521786,0.007267016,0.0036402259,0.0015265609,0.050144967,0.015221771,0.008350117,0.021449257,0.7013654,0.010451612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9556336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98232937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16565618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016994582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010049461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206510466","doi":"10.7202/1081771ar","title":"LES IMPACTS POTENTIELS DES ENQUÊTES DU MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE SUR L’IDENTITÉ MÉTISSE","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches amérindiennes au Québec","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Saint-Boniface","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07976891672701765,"score_gpt":0.3516151272423994,"score_spread":0.27184621051538177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206510466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91017205,0.02020567,0.00021966305,0.008229185,0.000828287,0.00026686193,0.000026465561,0.00015785442,0.059893943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95305175,0.0042600445,0.0018824558,0.000091418064,0.0017968342,0.00003070314,0.0000074801337,0.0000694244,0.038809866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476165,0.0018988693,0.0006253079,0.00065638946,0.0004920978,0.0015657133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937788,0.004703211,0.00032858268,0.00040087383,0.0002947809,0.00049375184],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040962333,0.0005187409,0.0005259352,0.0001349487,0.0024702682,0.00039707954,0.00081499084,0.0008096187,0.00034198034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035476077,0.0005394799,0.00041078555,0.0007161851,0.0029250619,0.00096624583,0.00027910643,0.00068027043,0.0002645513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014459393,0.0016825078,0.55932456,0.0028587568,0.0002200712,0.0008694186,0.13638224,0.00028176192,0.0039166063,0.16358788,0.009095066,0.12163652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077726337,0.0003963224,0.6084208,0.0018530447,0.0014393057,0.0006395805,0.0975453,0.0002341009,0.0033388035,0.015145389,0.26853558,0.0016745094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9527341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2594405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040788986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028005363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210949216","doi":"10.7202/1085791ar","title":"Examen parlementaire et contrôle judiciaire de la législation exécutive : évaluation de l’expérience canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029657543650187683,"score_gpt":0.31293348090838424,"score_spread":0.28327593725819655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210949216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91003984,0.0032079807,0.001894758,0.01802348,0.00048661671,0.00028884437,0.000046475045,0.000050679188,0.065961316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876484,0.0022220395,0.0017219548,0.0011681534,0.00051394454,0.00005768654,0.000039211154,0.000022563385,0.0066060117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965544,0.0013707733,0.0003571724,0.00045559104,0.00030150003,0.00096058147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981996,0.0007365815,0.00020771586,0.00026333408,0.00020937588,0.00038340007],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032272069,0.0001602462,0.00028513596,0.00004749639,0.00053607515,0.00017800629,0.0002670971,0.00026221192,0.00051438535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011182611,0.000269507,0.00013156977,0.0005387215,0.00048198612,0.0006003712,0.00007041235,0.0003258822,0.00005623921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049957933,0.0002586046,0.08754618,0.00026263646,0.00008681591,0.0010862589,0.16875257,0.0014351059,0.0032046032,0.6337627,0.0040572016,0.09949737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013769866,0.0003158374,0.3267213,0.0029265245,0.0007318627,0.00075169146,0.092277884,0.013219695,0.004752257,0.40324482,0.15238638,0.0012947551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07677354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14042462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23917513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002516426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019242883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212961305","doi":"10.1002/9781118269565.indcas","title":"Cases Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. George's, University of London; Louisiana State University; Georgetown University; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; York University; University of Miami; Emory University; Michigan State University; University of Pennsylvania; Università degli Studi di Firenze; Florida State University; Purdue University","keywords":"Index (typography); Citation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05104125988770594,"score_gpt":0.3687903258739418,"score_spread":0.31774906598623587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212961305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000026511143,0.0005142623,0.000026537984,0.0014144864,0.00016996614,0.00006585662,0.000001566829,0.00018824152,0.9976164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061821174,0.00034965048,0.00008851245,0.00040058146,0.0007010058,0.0000012363411,9.936571e-7,0.000034872257,0.992241],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950254,0.000026504356,0.000042722786,0.000106494335,0.0001840673,0.00013766732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997807,0.000033477696,0.000028863824,0.000090569556,0.000008533552,0.000057844638],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008208914,0.000060784754,0.00008534378,0.000042029467,0.00007133727,0.000033007895,0.00014002169,0.00014145348,0.030094372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006102911,0.00005191164,0.000032625197,0.00005904324,0.000089427915,0.000022509843,0.000008932631,0.000051815252,0.0007499406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9760544e-7,0.0000052668415,0.00004257081,0.0000030618362,0.0000017553525,0.000021544374,0.0001283473,1.2951045e-8,9.619717e-8,0.02804389,0.9642062,0.007546665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012100593,0.000007928856,0.000044842607,0.00004132117,0.0000055553996,9.5240455e-7,0.00031459003,8.0169755e-8,3.740478e-7,0.00036058458,0.99913186,0.000079802485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07195361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13737701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06542339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018781577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000754334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97079223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213248514","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.43531","title":"Grimes, Hon. Roger (Dale), (born 2 May 1950), MHA (L) Exploits, 1989–2005; Premier, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 2000–03","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.02922701572947382,"score_gpt":0.2897968117371346,"score_spread":0.2605697960076608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213248514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015452945,0.10571055,0.000028597646,0.0071514947,0.005476092,0.0013556995,0.00094758504,0.00025609045,0.86362094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016079878,0.14520204,0.00017779146,0.0011920248,0.0050634425,0.00006018126,0.00031415102,0.00013906632,0.83177143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372846,0.00036006808,0.0008037934,0.0012524647,0.0019776782,0.0018775433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678355,0.00063366257,0.00046171888,0.0007258475,0.00028214,0.0011130762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012407951,0.0008321492,0.0012093609,0.00025150215,0.001292905,0.0005604656,0.0011017787,0.0010925075,0.0014891576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003779975,0.0007970099,0.0002126189,0.0005290289,0.0006645474,0.00055006554,0.00026890755,0.0012573763,0.00014653531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068153495,0.00005855168,0.0052643665,0.00038286607,0.000111141126,0.0002427883,0.0033038512,0.0000013009408,9.964515e-7,0.0033577078,0.9419094,0.0452989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038202264,0.000057515103,0.0050246934,0.0012344184,0.00021090815,0.000027320984,0.0015451099,0.0000035849766,0.00001061222,0.00029686966,0.99021864,0.0009882835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94805104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99070585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048309285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022256877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008050939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221090915","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0096","title":"The reinvention of Canadian tort law, 1945–95: <i>Jordan House</i> as case study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Pleading; Law; Plaintiff; Lawsuit; Redress; Political science; Tort reform; Doctrine; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.026942741274139426,"score_gpt":0.26372171234855196,"score_spread":0.23677897107441254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221090915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81519455,0.0006796033,0.0000038108724,0.0017762017,0.00054169516,0.00022163417,0.000013031463,0.000015107367,0.18155438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817485,0.00025963376,0.000037455782,0.000053885047,0.00006271831,1.2179135e-7,2.9120147e-7,0.000004324898,0.0014067463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987229,0.0003778494,0.00013257923,0.000093989824,0.0004619792,0.00021070526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992704,0.000066413355,0.00017120858,0.00013297703,0.00013716723,0.00022182737],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012059431,0.000054693646,0.00010893007,0.000022786526,0.0058381376,0.00003657047,0.0004358414,0.000023553304,0.0010757222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002128352,0.000055891822,0.00010421603,0.000079594865,0.00031379974,0.00036179254,0.00008454354,0.00014987857,0.0000023895966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035729288,0.00045969823,0.004339731,0.000014176262,0.00022607477,0.00916495,0.17651357,0.00014422757,0.00006221336,0.7706552,0.03322485,0.0048379814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002054692,0.00026715314,0.00017499097,0.0000067849064,0.00005570811,0.00025180043,0.3781836,0.0000025088448,0.000003962536,0.00033887048,0.6204527,0.00005644657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77031636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007201511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003656846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224298600","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.6","title":"Justice in Extreme Cases: Criminal Law Theory Meets International Criminal Law. By Darryl Robinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 305 + xix pages.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.030777963084795027,"score_gpt":0.2596928976830463,"score_spread":0.2289149345982513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224298600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062885985,0.0005319365,0.0000864969,0.013636088,0.004903411,0.00056667655,0.0069341487,0.00008608904,0.91036916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95838237,0.00028602284,0.00023735438,0.0033833256,0.00074307394,0.000047153124,0.00067258923,0.000053682525,0.036194433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954809,0.00042158517,0.00069510785,0.0008335966,0.0015991866,0.0009696121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714166,0.00039804855,0.00037808166,0.00037981113,0.00077973097,0.00092268514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014758178,0.00037817424,0.00038261083,0.00038586106,0.0009162122,0.00022966621,0.0028364838,0.0001972682,0.0018712907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048776247,0.0005388366,0.00024952908,0.00026501846,0.0009830883,0.0010202806,0.0003548415,0.0007478641,0.000028433515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029755165,0.00012494941,0.0004473267,0.000029334515,0.00017478532,0.002250002,0.001650363,0.00031083933,0.00009690961,0.90727544,0.0870282,0.00031431852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008022548,0.00009984003,0.0008888289,0.00012701818,0.0001621826,0.00033939967,0.008658404,0.0006232363,0.00012583766,0.00067606475,0.98691887,0.0005780673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.798122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8352314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90659934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009913788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022261974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225504452","doi":"10.36642/mjil.43.2.criminal","title":"Criminal Law in A World of States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of International Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Criminal law; Political science; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Municipal law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.029243267011669325,"score_gpt":0.3300993353739787,"score_spread":0.3008560683623093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225504452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87363404,0.00039397366,0.00005097636,0.009361023,0.0012063513,0.000064140506,0.000027192873,0.0000060791863,0.115256205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753183,0.000036219804,0.0004351951,0.00074557855,0.00018508956,0.0000019315603,0.000002509122,0.0000053350964,0.001056338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984284,0.00015883663,0.0004482082,0.00007946781,0.0007421307,0.00014293996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918437,0.00017170994,0.0003120642,0.000055066535,0.00021217536,0.00006458685],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011363799,0.000059950216,0.00015248187,0.00017006168,0.00017671775,0.000032361462,0.00056010275,0.0000131535435,0.0010538008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006151817,0.000059544476,0.00010154345,0.00017482214,0.00023738205,0.00028231397,0.00007947857,0.00025321206,0.0000032097712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019627961,0.00014335837,0.002369964,0.0000069996763,0.000025801193,0.00008816492,0.011883964,0.0006159107,0.000714941,0.9832116,0.00052854687,0.00021451108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071836455,0.00029458976,0.0027924618,0.00015160594,0.000038621652,0.00009298909,0.025025949,0.000056267516,0.0017798144,0.046164874,0.92270994,0.00017453112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042197816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03516926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9370467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011338215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011982561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225562594","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4063124","title":"It Shouldn't Be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards Under Canada's Personal Information Protection Legislation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Business; Personally identifiable information; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science","score_opus":0.01957235627340888,"score_gpt":0.2604508874145545,"score_spread":0.24087853114114563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225562594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5667298,0.0024451467,0.010197317,0.39718145,0.002278413,0.0010326658,0.00004093145,0.00005799566,0.020036312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971421,0.00046066332,0.0000064017318,0.00076443783,0.00044115924,0.0000166604,0.0000070139768,0.0000057092448,0.0011558884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764764,0.0003220181,0.00024430547,0.00008366806,0.00088487973,0.0008174919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999402,0.000046809844,0.00026044992,0.00008166341,0.00015640538,0.000052663636],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029059828,0.000086350396,0.00009418205,0.000061597486,0.001886096,0.000075235745,0.00031017183,0.00004275019,0.00021536573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006128696,0.000069697206,0.00007445965,0.00030040444,0.000077445635,0.00047047992,0.00003974208,0.0013592808,0.0000010311882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043802545,0.00011539789,0.0013708997,0.00004551924,0.00025562482,0.000005297892,0.09873373,0.006067918,0.00028525657,0.751719,0.017484907,0.12347843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024983732,0.00022082184,0.0011738149,0.000010983016,0.000045836892,0.00009270201,0.3209457,0.00047651285,0.0000149294065,0.01911256,0.6575058,0.00015046498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3791384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7326064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002406291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011179214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226521428","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4061125","title":"The Real Lesson of the Freedom Convoy ‘Emergency’: Canada Needs a Public Order Policing Act","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Public order; Order (exchange); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.017454993032595966,"score_gpt":0.2755493330074708,"score_spread":0.25809433997487485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226521428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94836056,0.0010145732,0.00001939858,0.041318037,0.0012621083,0.00018678237,0.0000031528832,0.0000101199685,0.007825256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929844,0.0018936482,9.945269e-7,0.000070706235,0.00032158272,0.000008390048,3.0051402e-7,0.000009624118,0.004710369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963008,0.000653801,0.0002921529,0.00010173493,0.0009756513,0.0016758305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991351,0.00014487286,0.0002659592,0.00020362213,0.0001660809,0.00008435824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040892595,0.00009177234,0.0001224484,0.000044216347,0.0043885303,0.00006312928,0.0010962497,0.00002349622,0.00018029843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002964406,0.000058091075,0.00009195291,0.0008301611,0.00013863452,0.00013625939,0.00014326848,0.0013879323,7.402018e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005674095,0.00007948186,0.06546147,0.0000031740253,0.00015380634,0.0000030571953,0.014432712,0.00021050044,0.00015771369,0.9052088,0.0053488933,0.008883618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005448979,0.0004556327,0.013966589,0.0000128547035,0.000118814445,0.00011260108,0.5521993,0.0000992891,0.000020385494,0.049851097,0.3822828,0.00033572322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93837523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99618584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002133145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020643324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230387117","doi":"10.7202/042818ar","title":"Duquet Revisited","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018064131597059538,"score_gpt":0.28433694206368576,"score_spread":0.2662728104666262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230387117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51357937,0.03447765,0.0043115267,0.13231885,0.0011314355,0.00032503332,0.00003962818,0.00019558951,0.31362092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72042584,0.0028245614,0.002194563,0.0035281861,0.0017809349,0.0000064069104,0.000005839521,0.000019042041,0.2692146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982924,0.000206668,0.00023732046,0.0002884001,0.00032531132,0.0006499139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990976,0.00021903857,0.00008946489,0.00023073185,0.000062562074,0.00030060855],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078026345,0.00015565012,0.00021380487,0.000047892274,0.0005165447,0.00010653966,0.00035795895,0.00040484406,0.0022124697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028044617,0.0001873618,0.00015889294,0.00039597566,0.0012118123,0.0003804572,0.000027929093,0.0004827434,0.0014800237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001926444,0.000059377187,0.0005884457,0.00007814743,0.000025609817,0.000056036035,0.016205827,0.000055855595,0.00010994698,0.68565583,0.05006481,0.24708086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011704249,0.00003997948,0.0008119685,0.00016065633,0.00008437982,0.000022129183,0.0019056064,0.0002243435,0.00014554452,0.01714465,0.97910285,0.00024086906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024817872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016325517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92903805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013882815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231199517","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.2.153","title":"LEGITIMATING PUBLIC POLICY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Public policy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Policy making; Democratic legitimacy; Policy analysis; Position (finance); Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.049899822072171154,"score_gpt":0.28419272028929593,"score_spread":0.2342928982171248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231199517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063113324,0.0003993111,0.00051705795,0.006348528,0.00013972732,0.000042247255,0.0000020215045,0.000026495361,0.9294113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951168,0.00070901425,0.0016503504,0.00006529524,0.00028600227,8.049367e-9,2.2783306e-7,0.0000021767512,0.0021701385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927014,0.000092507085,0.00007667613,0.00006324804,0.0002893597,0.00020807465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944097,0.0000458688,0.00010480765,0.000063785235,0.00016099706,0.0001835911],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031280896,0.00004247977,0.000091819384,0.000017653325,0.0023103824,0.000028695655,0.000302086,0.000040430998,0.0014906259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009068976,0.000048843984,0.000082301834,0.000038309947,0.00047873636,0.0011615139,0.000039909468,0.000083285355,0.00001388804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028862762,0.00006689439,0.0025925606,0.000008084104,0.000028853525,0.0001532988,0.043483593,0.000007461151,0.00008877822,0.93370944,0.010436279,0.00939587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025520017,0.000051553114,0.0028904951,0.00003126868,0.000012662619,0.00010212165,0.030475026,0.000012480305,0.000011401684,0.0008782175,0.9651743,0.000105275474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42948765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29450658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038378252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032640412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231452064","doi":"10.7202/042661ar","title":"A Response to the Suggested Amendment Relating to Provincial Administrative Tribunals","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03613728939388007,"score_gpt":0.3339286611360973,"score_spread":0.29779137174221726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231452064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144632,0.00053699646,0.0015544822,0.27412918,0.00034746813,0.0007682961,0.0000603863,0.000044930966,0.008095102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868259,0.000033038432,0.002442746,0.006471246,0.0009132275,0.00009826794,0.0000023654904,0.000019633835,0.121760435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965797,0.0010718539,0.00041976038,0.0004428622,0.00062573946,0.0008600528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975022,0.0013704451,0.00014401293,0.0002983185,0.000119172655,0.00056582585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036261159,0.00022955627,0.00026462716,0.000076654935,0.0011689605,0.0002091782,0.00054664415,0.00028648588,0.00032405037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028038018,0.00021304567,0.00015174651,0.0007707777,0.0006029641,0.00024106693,0.00007924298,0.00056793226,0.0007285074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003913113,0.00027518027,0.00034086226,0.000046600853,0.00008755541,0.00017368635,0.46125668,0.0013105819,0.004190424,0.27332652,0.051470328,0.20360845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023061829,0.00076710526,0.0014117429,0.00023290516,0.000087354354,0.00002127328,0.027625626,0.000092794566,0.001503584,0.0017479565,0.9659304,0.00034861956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028744896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018684145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91446006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00304047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006591587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231564628","doi":"10.29173/alr788","title":"You Don't Know What You've Got 'Til It's Gone: The Rule of Law in Canada — Part II","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Rule of law; Independence (probability theory); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.056558306083832006,"score_gpt":0.3189460206199108,"score_spread":0.2623877145360788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231564628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013096055,0.40999773,2.3940794e-7,0.1646149,0.0012968164,0.00095632975,0.000009025517,0.000013156716,0.41001576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6774027,0.28075525,0.00002762415,0.028795712,0.00029831627,0.000107102656,0.000014723214,0.000026472133,0.01257212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979693,0.00035629072,0.00046510276,0.00025590273,0.00054856826,0.0004048044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998571,0.00044463872,0.00017364217,0.00046396154,0.00013999006,0.00020678864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014471512,0.0001555378,0.00044577336,0.000007695085,0.000298238,0.00006731922,0.00063368585,0.000053740907,0.00035722242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048369312,0.00010822339,0.000097157674,0.00029029808,0.00034952752,0.00057727785,0.00012384182,0.00015517887,0.00007656954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001450376,0.00007625727,0.0006102463,0.0007593863,0.000025701958,0.000014253723,0.00944197,0.0000039924,0.0000018933108,0.8278029,0.13640413,0.024844766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008415891,0.000022562419,0.000023825976,0.0032607038,0.000062334446,0.0000025935651,0.0018537184,0.0000013513655,0.000012431839,0.0006088216,0.9939256,0.000141909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99522066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026367878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010604621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44132218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231995041","doi":"10.7202/1027462ar","title":"Alain Baccigalupo, Police et droits de l’homme : droit pénal comparé Canada-France, Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2001, 1032 pages, ISBN 2-89451-519-7 John Currie, Public International Law, Essentials of Canadian Law, Toronto, Irwin Law, 2001, 446 pages, ISBN 1-55221-051-0 Maurice MARTEL, Paul MARTEL, La compagnie au Québec : Les aspects juridiques, volume I, Montréal, édition spéciale, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002, pagination par chapitre, ISBN 2-920831-88-7 Donna F. Ryan, John S. Schuchman, Deaf People in Hitler's Europe, Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C., 2002, 233 pages","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02033145907969716,"score_gpt":0.23744157701433521,"score_spread":0.21711011793463805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231995041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122314535,0.038230956,0.00051757507,0.091734916,0.0031974223,0.0032537263,0.0057816296,0.0004444078,0.73452485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058314,0.05346803,0.00093060354,0.0016414794,0.0011656946,0.0000735978,0.0011542571,0.00023661954,0.035498336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874814,0.0034096295,0.0019661728,0.0018987948,0.0018769179,0.0033670613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929108,0.0008682504,0.0014987491,0.001228928,0.0014669055,0.002026347],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004225998,0.0012013072,0.0018132146,0.0006707083,0.0017671854,0.0008029584,0.002223849,0.0010025102,0.004515467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007052044,0.0018412517,0.00044884373,0.0021754885,0.0015188265,0.003656767,0.00033859856,0.0014824857,0.00010822933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014383785,0.0009803363,0.008727673,0.000657034,0.0002668555,0.0005634873,0.0023404548,0.000557036,0.00019646565,0.36631182,0.61839557,0.0008593976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018199978,0.00019207218,0.021260168,0.0013336756,0.00038927534,0.00023854536,0.0014055527,0.0008579706,0.000315389,0.0017025825,0.96873325,0.0017515138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008588687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008232392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233329049","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181012","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen and Lorena Lam <i>[2014] A.J. No. 428, 2014 ABPC 90 LEXIS 420 (Alberta Provincial Court, April 17, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Lexis; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Botany; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018510656965219644,"score_gpt":0.26642897037290825,"score_spread":0.2479183134076886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233329049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22345367,0.09283423,0.0003136959,0.12458489,0.0024614187,0.004663891,0.00019580171,0.00028526346,0.5512071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64321434,0.30763966,0.00086111616,0.020683268,0.0059149032,0.000111779074,0.0000715573,0.000118668395,0.021384688],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.00022824408,0.0004756534,0.0004831216,0.000118353244,0.00049261976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984916,0.00053884985,0.0002640547,0.00039017881,0.00007094436,0.00024437206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154751,0.00025784117,0.0006029658,0.000018415725,0.0008255781,0.00026514602,0.00040156185,0.00014491855,0.00017044332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018908601,0.00019743582,0.00011703255,0.0000414237,0.0006505954,0.0004707078,0.000167584,0.0002194827,0.0005192851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037119917,0.00006242886,0.033477914,0.0023915628,0.00013536376,0.0000024608933,0.0027483166,0.0000056866797,0.000007448257,0.39765286,0.50329274,0.060186133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013600625,0.000053169224,0.00169431,0.000280222,0.00019880643,0.000003216255,0.000052138992,0.000018410356,0.0000047175404,0.0015199438,0.9957458,0.0002932546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033334393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034413077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52982247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006713979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010994001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233430983","doi":"10.7202/1027463ar","title":"William M. Clements, Oratory in Native North America, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, 2002, 186 pages Gilles Létourneau, Pierre Robert, Code de procédure pénale du Québec annoté, 5 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2002, 871 pages, ISBN 2-89127-553-5 Hubert Reid, Claire Carrier, Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et Doctrine, 18 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2002, 1494 pages, ISBN 2-89127-555-1","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017948350443539544,"score_gpt":0.23871220949038408,"score_spread":0.22076385904684453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233430983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41361398,0.355743,0.012830683,0.14234701,0.002813923,0.013894795,0.010771142,0.0014058098,0.046579666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54447436,0.26994458,0.0031434249,0.0030417212,0.0020086234,0.0007673426,0.0009528266,0.00046677812,0.17520037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887752,0.00305913,0.0018743437,0.0021763984,0.0016442252,0.0024707278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927475,0.0011651353,0.002057799,0.0014917792,0.0015223849,0.0010154085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025661413,0.0013163683,0.0017209456,0.00042763876,0.0030622613,0.00039135618,0.0018032325,0.0010262629,0.002425731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015404389,0.0015963434,0.00069272047,0.0028609973,0.0026913178,0.0024706917,0.00035599223,0.0022311152,0.00024088661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078155205,0.0016456526,0.044589467,0.0010230566,0.00038635527,0.00040933676,0.013841842,0.007640221,0.00024582434,0.0015709266,0.92531115,0.0025546404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019830551,0.0006134436,0.022384254,0.002038005,0.00074971747,0.00034477763,0.005136696,0.0014904994,0.00023823827,0.00067624304,0.9626382,0.0017068885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4883781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95685434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46847624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00476063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005621256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234953274","doi":"10.29173/alr104","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04124957388427745,"score_gpt":0.3541180729194079,"score_spread":0.3128684990351304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234953274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084705383,0.17065452,0.000010903267,0.15204535,0.0012808912,0.00033270768,2.9099874e-7,0.000038107464,0.6747902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7907707,0.1562801,0.00023570564,0.0139716165,0.0076561607,0.000052649135,0.000008130104,0.000016079939,0.03100882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992531,0.00014163149,0.000118301126,0.00009304262,0.00015403912,0.00023987934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995452,0.000111781286,0.00003906431,0.00015862424,0.000031759315,0.00011353268],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080701895,0.000051659306,0.00011837339,0.000004889239,0.00023098578,0.000017208964,0.00011396631,0.000026032698,0.00282228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039044497,0.000043511085,0.00005426341,0.0001262096,0.000106390326,0.00043267698,0.000016689093,0.000050825794,0.0022115828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.106427e-7,0.00001354399,0.00016455218,0.0001662379,0.0000024440642,8.204058e-8,0.0003482784,1.0279023e-8,0.0000033523309,0.88749367,0.10461703,0.007190319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010140894,0.00000417903,0.000068781825,0.00025314398,0.00003770097,0.000002369624,0.000029144165,4.2398778e-8,0.000010653944,0.0001844785,0.99933803,0.000061357874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022963583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009661036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030249526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017155338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235167399","doi":"10.21991/cf29417","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026382444784000644,"score_gpt":0.3017124128306336,"score_spread":0.27532996804663296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235167399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005427863,0.0028905259,0.10947536,0.32115585,0.010292627,0.0005160821,0.00012715365,0.0005691276,0.5495454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886972,0.00027072622,0.0016835247,0.001692977,0.0016387479,0.000038421134,0.00011595202,0.000006755068,0.005855719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975044,0.0001523033,0.00039596902,0.00055199314,0.00066533324,0.000730001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983667,0.00016085652,0.00010547206,0.00034049054,0.00072719494,0.00029927044],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049979845,0.00020481812,0.00023848169,0.00011494248,0.0029481705,0.00020519234,0.00026603657,0.00018884944,0.003132524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016516875,0.00022618729,0.00020138177,0.0005863136,0.006508083,0.0010171862,0.000120505436,0.00025627358,0.0011045845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002039685,0.00008119353,0.0029699912,0.000009004003,0.000027051266,0.00006173096,0.00014348894,0.00015989228,0.00039939044,0.9151811,0.07928452,0.0016622262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033424728,0.0000149618745,0.0001812901,0.000051064602,0.000040989802,0.00023223988,0.0055678706,0.000033070846,0.00076320465,0.030492807,0.9619915,0.00029674248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003262796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017627946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98326933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035511155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036390454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235702979","doi":"10.4135/9781412963916.n52","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Encyclopedia of Education Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.019353915251439334,"score_gpt":0.2983462665646404,"score_spread":0.2789923513132011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235702979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065756333,0.004944131,7.9771183e-7,0.0014407153,0.0028227319,0.00022251254,0.000077513665,0.00000876932,0.9839072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33363506,0.17012706,0.00042975933,0.0002991915,0.003436579,0.000053860356,0.00022791917,0.000028846232,0.4917617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877167,0.00008699343,0.00031594516,0.0002304827,0.00034475722,0.00025013037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988606,0.00013153808,0.00023347359,0.00022211597,0.00024851688,0.0003037608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001691147,0.00014413861,0.00030372103,0.0001501547,0.00028529082,0.000017315997,0.0002687927,0.00027576697,0.00073004025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008824747,0.0001383357,0.00006510673,0.00014966846,0.0006218347,0.00017824843,0.000018345187,0.00017432024,0.00002544531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038008557,0.00007987881,0.000656441,0.00016995563,0.000018879377,0.000001465159,0.014463062,6.4301055e-8,1.8059474e-7,0.16369015,0.8094768,0.011439342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036266058,0.00002271976,0.0006744233,0.00031444922,0.0000396153,0.0000017508763,0.0007923305,8.377685e-8,0.0000030632607,0.0049507073,0.99302137,0.00014321579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88452137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7988697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49214548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015478967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041790796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7993429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236249622","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17007412","title":"Non-disclosure of information in the prosecution of preventive detention regimes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certificate; Order (exchange); Terrorism; Political science; Law; Kingdom; Control (management); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.013907541134761513,"score_gpt":0.3146600912582378,"score_spread":0.3007525501234763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236249622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8511682,0.00007364846,0.00005029494,0.00019027204,0.00020137458,0.00093324104,0.000003962112,0.0000068968197,0.14737207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308914,0.00012729251,0.000072528965,0.000008947071,0.000026937056,0.0000554276,0.00017889499,0.000002332335,0.0064384714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989322,0.00010557825,0.00035950058,0.00007134825,0.00043031026,0.0001010697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990875,0.000059974227,0.0004514537,0.00010502272,0.0002828761,0.000013167467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007287545,0.00007417269,0.00014374244,0.000101060206,0.00007694165,0.00003092007,0.00021270903,0.00016269532,0.00009621252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014311564,0.000051918767,0.00007972116,0.00022985134,0.00006828879,0.0007658275,0.0000061585333,0.00009935494,0.000014560253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031694138,0.00034304184,0.004932762,0.0030253662,0.00006348135,6.710673e-7,0.61483264,0.000020782156,0.0018160674,0.31705686,0.013231442,0.044359934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004159025,0.0002993424,0.34335002,0.002036152,0.00019423533,5.0413394e-7,0.6175258,0.00008177903,0.0099505335,0.016810017,0.008958391,0.00037732534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012295698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010194019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33841726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030931016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015015397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236626227","doi":"10.4324/9780203854389-17","title":"Applying “the McCarthy Test” to Canadian and American security legislation: A 10-year retrospective on the impact of September 11, 2001 on privacy rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Test (biology); Political science; Computer security; Law; Internet privacy; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.030857048252489687,"score_gpt":0.3163075934345032,"score_spread":0.2854505451820135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236626227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016420968,0.00001122578,0.000001030676,0.0060811737,0.00008779139,0.0011985608,0.00006586994,0.000022160964,0.97611123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7839272,0.000018597228,0.000036570436,0.00043111024,0.000398459,0.000046085228,0.0000032529172,0.00001801576,0.21512073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985131,0.00005849423,0.0001929683,0.00035793448,0.0005099685,0.00036750405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982061,0.0006064336,0.00018637574,0.00044751423,0.00021156404,0.00034201308],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060040504,0.00024337201,0.00030006506,0.00009006799,0.0013281015,0.00019615206,0.00037795817,0.00016360731,0.0036839468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031380713,0.00013482544,0.00015240029,0.00011817963,0.0007195555,0.00008561678,0.000048170932,0.0004560847,0.00018459247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007185507,0.000035921577,0.0042831195,0.000007991127,0.000094992894,0.000016158236,0.012303481,0.0000040674004,0.000018004717,0.74945426,0.23218732,0.0015228454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049435243,0.00031074302,0.0035625598,0.00009034022,0.000031865133,0.0000015922022,0.00041190602,0.000004268312,0.000012329671,0.025604801,0.96968544,0.00023471558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7065378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93395025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7675062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040832406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004785617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238264043","doi":"10.7202/1027267ar","title":"Henri Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, jurisprudence, doctrine, Collection Alter Ego, 17 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1327 pages, ISBN 2-89127-658-2 Hélène Dumont, Anne-Marie BOISVERT (dir.), La voie vers la Cour pénale internationale : tous les chemins mènent à Rome /The Highway to the International Criminal Court: All Roads Lead to Rome, Les journées Maximilien-Caron 2003, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2004, 616 pages, ISBN 2-89400-187-8 Hubert Reid, Claire Carrier, Code de procédure civile du Québec. Jurisprudence et doctrine, 20 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1704 pages, ISBN 2-89127-646-9","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.01839942350318345,"score_gpt":0.2639160330164789,"score_spread":0.24551660951329546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238264043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23567869,0.2509102,0.013751537,0.46995214,0.0024164587,0.005350688,0.006234177,0.0010957937,0.014610314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5447455,0.22257902,0.0044813175,0.0046565887,0.0063786693,0.0020703545,0.0025867375,0.00044890586,0.21205293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885378,0.0018535214,0.0022176164,0.002240317,0.0026079833,0.0025427963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911591,0.0021959462,0.0013268574,0.0014733128,0.0024474384,0.0013973565],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044495948,0.0015451079,0.001388844,0.00077523856,0.0046165865,0.0018974998,0.0027739615,0.0011770315,0.0019440987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002666072,0.0016811008,0.0008248881,0.00228344,0.00199333,0.0027849714,0.00047195677,0.002372762,0.00047472923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006400007,0.0013409993,0.0061895307,0.0003232859,0.0005407785,0.00035265044,0.013241297,0.030368585,0.0015231723,0.0028472606,0.9349354,0.007697037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018456266,0.00039350943,0.0146063855,0.0021014067,0.0009980672,0.0019536396,0.0038394385,0.0043151085,0.0005164751,0.0012459062,0.9663543,0.0018301365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16933285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6828083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5134754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060353107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026733556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238924844","doi":"10.5040/9781784518899.chapter-016","title":"Canada – Comparisons Chapter written by Professor Bruce Welling, University of Western Ontario, Barrister and Solicitor (Ontario Bar). Note that this chapter on Canada was last updated in October 2012. Please therefore take further professional advice on the latest position before making decisions based on this chapter.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury Professional eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.027907135556625558,"score_gpt":0.2581736959272805,"score_spread":0.23026656037065496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238924844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46608835,0.00022534022,0.000014527367,0.035105843,0.0038770658,0.005218575,0.0023618743,0.00013993462,0.4869685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52914864,0.000008640579,0.00005253177,0.0038587793,0.00018171183,0.000017433867,0.00016246625,0.00007789943,0.46649188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949581,0.00026367605,0.00073733606,0.0010884416,0.002116323,0.00083614455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689114,0.0006755026,0.00085038494,0.00076355145,0.0003809068,0.00043851387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074486074,0.0008913216,0.0008521405,0.00020607607,0.0017151962,0.00007022078,0.00091360055,0.0007523144,0.013712227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032977754,0.0006685638,0.00020119223,0.000040875013,0.0007198421,0.00020372061,0.00031132234,0.0019225859,0.000076717544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017520148,0.0014668946,0.041641008,0.0004702374,0.0010445418,0.0013795885,0.10157171,0.00010733115,0.00027026943,0.18223223,0.645317,0.006979016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011038834,0.0003209597,0.007699301,0.006453865,0.00018444695,0.0000076181673,0.0011129869,0.00009530761,0.000038878898,0.00073691277,0.9812839,0.00096191885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3359669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016359641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004960831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238986525","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007402","title":"Reporting to the Human Rights Committee: The Canadian Experience","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Obligation; Political science; Law; Politics; Treaty; General assembly; International human rights law; Right to property","score_opus":0.03068383240583386,"score_gpt":0.3195047538595294,"score_spread":0.28882092145369553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238986525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2030233,0.000031132884,0.000027090615,0.08038406,0.0016044744,0.00034366714,0.0001352841,0.0000260222,0.71442497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704839,0.00000535885,0.000095681935,0.005509628,0.000982473,0.00006783904,0.000034678586,0.000017804823,0.022802666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724114,0.00009732605,0.0007096567,0.0003421078,0.0008671882,0.0007425842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997181,0.00013995272,0.00038695062,0.00039839168,0.000809168,0.0010845267],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015123379,0.00016932246,0.0001744683,0.0003104174,0.00215772,0.00032567926,0.0023142144,0.0001223171,0.0017330264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009389411,0.00014686387,0.00013703988,0.0002727699,0.0005977867,0.0003114579,0.00006620657,0.00031807262,0.000092583345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071940035,0.000008838866,0.017918525,0.0000015138855,0.000059094837,0.00028853273,0.008681969,0.0000950385,0.000014256305,0.9458134,0.026519645,0.0005919616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007425902,0.000016693766,0.014976604,0.00007125383,0.000011309407,0.00009950351,0.0015796939,0.000081167316,0.0000413193,0.0068127564,0.9760497,0.00018569306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99682647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9495301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004702877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002086851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239659277","doi":"10.5040/9781474202930.ch-005","title":"From Formalism to Reasonable Justification: The Transformation of Canadian Administrative Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.11289508212781757,"score_gpt":0.30924344321833974,"score_spread":0.19634836109052217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239659277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000473643,0.00005407425,0.00005553478,0.04008325,0.0004106344,0.0004513607,0.00050225185,0.000037118312,0.9583584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2607312,0.000028281305,0.00015614295,0.0016364532,0.0011334302,0.000048323072,0.00008230331,0.00002766532,0.7361562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844277,0.00005533504,0.00035554668,0.00024561887,0.0005774188,0.00032329865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841225,0.00029703995,0.00020581724,0.00035132383,0.00039156922,0.0003420121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009972446,0.00016916494,0.0002090154,0.0001706843,0.0007889663,0.00093693286,0.00072603853,0.0003090977,0.00070159254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023037159,0.00012479382,0.000105830026,0.000044714936,0.00035701608,0.0013272673,0.000028125809,0.00026785608,0.00010425416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010328442,0.0000011615231,2.8002933e-7,0.000010511899,0.000014143602,0.0000018368663,0.02370674,1.2738029e-7,0.00001555989,0.9262212,0.04367926,0.006338835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040359337,0.000019261339,0.0000074553886,0.00035847534,0.000044553984,7.6247164e-7,0.0017872277,4.8730055e-7,0.00014998585,0.042366322,0.95506465,0.00016043283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46822885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8261948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9113854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021503975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011191922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90348655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239670633","doi":"10.1017/9781316417119","title":"Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Criminal justice; Misconduct; Law; Political science; Criminology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03544369850264419,"score_gpt":0.2538950697789851,"score_spread":0.21845137127634093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239670633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008120677,0.00042082617,0.000059142705,0.0006636473,0.0003789996,0.00040833437,0.000088634566,0.00006580306,0.99783343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003092747,0.00086086005,0.000007863165,0.00004694018,0.0003116612,0.0000011262784,0.0000131550805,0.0000073680844,0.9956583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893725,0.00020468139,0.00009238485,0.00028013106,0.00025891003,0.00022661703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888897,0.0002230266,0.00020335759,0.00042250042,0.00013686047,0.00012527622],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043710403,0.0001496891,0.00023367692,0.00004596509,0.0026217317,0.00014754251,0.0005920938,0.00024871083,0.000004291162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010011809,0.00013834279,0.00012666578,0.0000056570484,0.002863452,0.0001655347,0.00023896174,0.0003198508,0.000015604042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049997623,0.0000018084659,0.000002019935,0.000020746698,0.000023281042,0.000016665652,0.00055013486,6.070544e-8,7.377755e-7,0.6975436,0.30143252,0.00035842397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038435432,0.0000099658855,0.000046901278,0.00011326187,0.00026280896,0.0000038744233,0.00048544412,0.000005704509,0.0000023686266,0.00006525212,0.9984571,0.00016299292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073481207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004078899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69747835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027830547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004396968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240520657","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2467682","title":"Rights-based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Ontario: The Constitutional Framework","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.023458300275682888,"score_gpt":0.31286957647014974,"score_spread":0.2894112761944668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240520657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96391493,0.0031088933,0.013377769,0.007959236,0.00065547496,0.00027163775,0.0000023953874,0.00002326119,0.010686417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989171,0.00012278261,0.000095073236,0.00033249526,0.00026775664,0.0000075013922,4.425933e-7,0.000003151311,0.00025369463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976319,0.00019280451,0.00015466956,0.00011049402,0.0003630362,0.0015470996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993452,0.0003139086,0.00005626202,0.000082703766,0.00005642576,0.00014551947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028436093,0.000096257565,0.00012570577,0.000054585853,0.0008205595,0.0001792595,0.00025806023,0.00008147872,0.00014531509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012685079,0.000064323845,0.00004096449,0.00016736909,0.00042573875,0.0004958283,0.000022641834,0.0013242016,0.000014310597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046847315,0.000034024124,0.026896935,0.0000014668378,0.000010730905,0.0000016689672,0.0042480472,0.000048495214,0.0000056969006,0.9680737,0.00006624568,0.0005661163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030933996,0.000097539116,0.044693567,0.00010635129,0.000031012543,0.000052091487,0.03277317,0.0000050092617,0.00001553983,0.85929286,0.062375866,0.00024763125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10084955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91172546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010949782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051336056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9106796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241338448","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u43531","title":"Grimes, Hon. Roger (Dale), (born 2 May 1950), MHA (L) Exploits, 1989–2005; Premier, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 2000–03","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Exploit; Geography; History; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.02922701572947382,"score_gpt":0.2897968117371346,"score_spread":0.2605697960076608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241338448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015452945,0.10571055,0.000028597646,0.0071514947,0.005476092,0.0013556995,0.00094758504,0.00025609045,0.86362094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016079878,0.14520204,0.00017779146,0.0011920248,0.0050634425,0.00006018126,0.00031415102,0.00013906632,0.83177143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372846,0.00036006808,0.0008037934,0.0012524647,0.0019776782,0.0018775433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678355,0.00063366257,0.00046171888,0.0007258475,0.00028214,0.0011130762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012407951,0.0008321492,0.0012093609,0.00025150215,0.001292905,0.0005604656,0.0011017787,0.0010925075,0.0014891576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003779975,0.0007970099,0.0002126189,0.0005290289,0.0006645474,0.00055006554,0.00026890755,0.0012573763,0.00014653531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068153495,0.00005855168,0.0052643665,0.00038286607,0.000111141126,0.0002427883,0.0033038512,0.0000013009408,9.964515e-7,0.0033577078,0.9419094,0.0452989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038202264,0.000057515103,0.0050246934,0.0012344184,0.00021090815,0.000027320984,0.0015451099,0.0000035849766,0.00001061222,0.00029686966,0.99021864,0.0009882835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94805104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99070585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048309285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022256877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008050939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241341417","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.4.545","title":"MIND THE GAP: CANADA'S DIFFERENT CRIMINAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARDS OF FAULT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Fault (geology); Criminal procedure; Section (typography); Ambivalence; Criminal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.037307828059278375,"score_gpt":0.25725847926338236,"score_spread":0.21995065120410398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241341417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7779123,0.0012682097,0.0022398015,0.0011867463,0.00045512608,0.00012461928,0.00015691484,0.0000043793348,0.21665187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990951,0.00029491424,0.00023579621,0.00001898872,0.000032920616,1.0048188e-8,2.8178832e-7,7.9974336e-7,0.00032118315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991951,0.00008551037,0.000086972344,0.000060049788,0.00045375017,0.000118638294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993953,0.000077407865,0.00011100621,0.00005334963,0.00025257867,0.00011037634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002961855,0.000047791273,0.000101048565,0.000005703653,0.0007727653,0.000014770739,0.00018997141,0.000028662951,0.0014250849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045933582,0.000037814323,0.000041450807,0.000009991402,0.0024884683,0.00024122022,0.000036827936,0.00007313712,1.3001555e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002784503,0.0000569117,0.0062646186,0.000017177283,0.00006441894,0.000059530656,0.02923027,0.000003107085,0.00006388018,0.9545559,0.0041796193,0.005226064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064646685,0.00020147311,0.046875793,0.00015389259,0.00028306703,0.000072061746,0.1423832,0.0000123378095,0.00026275768,0.0009115107,0.8080001,0.00019737137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95249206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95364445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031802114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006445929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241661006","doi":"10.4324/9781003080510-6","title":"Cy près settlements in privacy class actions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Class (philosophy); Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Geography; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1585607141219234,"score_gpt":0.3716286158135156,"score_spread":0.21306790169159218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241661006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033851466,0.00005827336,0.000023041752,0.021523288,0.00029327854,0.00026247973,0.000015357706,0.00007034794,0.9777201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03991085,0.00039451578,0.00019340242,0.00090703386,0.00043431227,0.000010165795,0.00001733021,0.000019040139,0.9581134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988451,0.000024656592,0.00021958385,0.0002886936,0.00040780072,0.00021415328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994965,0.00008224282,0.000080552265,0.00016194693,0.000043536882,0.00013520259],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017865037,0.00014229855,0.00019031251,0.00006520705,0.0002009891,0.00007100699,0.00032197617,0.00019589615,0.0053055747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009077583,0.00014193032,0.000089454865,0.000046138426,0.00013047132,0.00017655831,0.00010514071,0.00030365968,0.0012349085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054600964,0.0000085426145,0.00007019148,0.000015349338,0.000010808898,0.000017782762,0.0015662361,3.469745e-7,0.000004155959,0.95301497,0.042298853,0.0029872733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005549426,0.000018251687,0.00008045642,0.000076690034,0.000020560376,3.3826478e-7,0.00040555294,0.0000018716571,0.0000030414371,0.02326786,0.9759077,0.00016221267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002021442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013306709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93360883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023336479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002836518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242197345","doi":"10.5040/9781472560391.ch-012","title":"‘Because I Said So!’ Is That Ever Good Enough?—Findings and Reasons in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.07963822009162705,"score_gpt":0.3046414681264842,"score_spread":0.22500324803485713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242197345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073368946,0.00021471502,0.0000019325203,0.0123736495,0.00035997294,0.0003787639,0.00016898532,0.00007218258,0.98569614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46646944,0.000045104,0.000073064075,0.003139556,0.00037383387,0.000018236711,0.000026647855,0.000046878733,0.5298072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724704,0.00011093103,0.00032749755,0.0007177689,0.0007146636,0.0008820735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792045,0.00042983642,0.00018596015,0.00038649223,0.00016476103,0.0009124689],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018068542,0.00038987765,0.0004752638,0.000261188,0.001050952,0.0038439464,0.0006482525,0.00078146794,0.0007630159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005110155,0.00041505837,0.00012413571,0.000035214656,0.00088695507,0.0012132623,0.0001287314,0.0009315848,0.000088847366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008387894,0.0000032667529,0.00030744154,0.000030018211,0.000022398555,0.000069347814,0.014890478,2.0146835e-8,0.0000021757446,0.936396,0.046392974,0.0018774999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011647419,0.000036540234,0.00020815908,0.00063993264,0.000049818053,0.000009219639,0.000645072,7.9678307e-7,0.000021707723,0.011589233,0.98620635,0.0004766826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74379367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98056644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005609942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019394143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242206263","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19611","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Nicky Fortunato <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1502; 2015 ONSC 1845 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera","score_opus":0.06143848215864963,"score_gpt":0.32837721160953137,"score_spread":0.26693872945088176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242206263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59250003,0.22812371,0.0000748898,0.08639139,0.0019571115,0.003102699,0.00030401233,0.00011034618,0.087435834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7469008,0.22316441,0.00202129,0.007464531,0.0014461873,0.00009895621,0.00006458405,0.00009003745,0.018749237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998463,0.00014010111,0.000515937,0.0003344134,0.00014813658,0.00039843668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869424,0.00027042447,0.00020720015,0.00033678528,0.0001696137,0.00032172844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024688242,0.00019923909,0.0006050877,0.000021924328,0.000377999,0.00012120532,0.00033677198,0.00011564128,0.00009233247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001542567,0.00015825838,0.00009081474,0.000062975014,0.0006145488,0.00043114086,0.00017441272,0.00021060655,0.00008129083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015269757,0.00019417054,0.15791799,0.007144648,0.0004054016,0.000018856686,0.01713684,0.000015081765,0.000014736625,0.227527,0.5586264,0.030846138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019140134,0.00006223212,0.0015768344,0.0003791364,0.00044862565,0.0000066942966,0.00057743763,0.000009866525,0.0000031523252,0.00080670224,0.9957193,0.00021861232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05612262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10972293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43709287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014750496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039851773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95016277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242455817","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-07709","title":"Police perceptions of the Youth Criminal Justice Act and its implementation: Ontario case study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminology; Humanities; Law; Library science; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.10437374710081586,"score_gpt":0.4620763847836884,"score_spread":0.3577026376828725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242455817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96187073,0.000029103026,0.0000015760215,0.000055283963,0.00044106273,0.0005838963,0.000014046035,0.000014379229,0.036989912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977078,0.000020993177,0.00002842761,0.000054605338,0.0001646379,0.000010101382,0.000026652231,0.0000082087945,0.02260838],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986531,0.00012493652,0.00029373993,0.00022833844,0.0004813212,0.00021855271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992137,0.000116529525,0.000171185,0.00014731773,0.000258047,0.00009322873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053728366,0.00014121474,0.00016430746,0.00006822518,0.0010352546,0.000070681956,0.0002034655,0.000105736064,0.0013212002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035743084,0.000108759734,0.00007243944,0.00017564463,0.000066423636,0.00017938271,0.000029565064,0.00020868435,0.000006973415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025760788,0.000083596344,0.009519479,0.00008324394,0.0000195263,0.000017837161,0.98793864,3.5665218e-7,0.000013853251,0.0011433094,0.00013585953,0.0010185165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011753513,0.000078131605,0.09087755,0.000027763259,0.0014684859,0.00002322528,0.90702146,3.220671e-7,0.000021243519,0.00000691287,0.0002422374,0.000115127616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93059987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08135807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016005215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060830684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243055318","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199248179.013.0034","title":"Criminal Process","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Criminal justice; Process (computing); Criminology; Sociology; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08559882581464091,"score_gpt":0.39542365208355035,"score_spread":0.30982482626890945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243055318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021930506,0.003145126,0.000036960082,0.0034717205,0.000993188,0.00018598247,0.000013411495,0.00015289102,0.9917814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02426645,0.05372742,0.00023453723,0.00050564687,0.0054112994,0.000028289684,0.00003417741,0.000022633818,0.9157695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792075,0.00008598492,0.0002330119,0.00037787852,0.0008652454,0.00051714893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916124,0.00011523068,0.00011028285,0.00020204726,0.00019234334,0.00021885025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030181315,0.0002114997,0.00029351457,0.000079669924,0.00048546656,0.00017398149,0.00063779636,0.00042982402,0.008431152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020436577,0.0001822763,0.00012371651,0.00016635776,0.0002720665,0.00024383063,0.0000481244,0.00041874108,0.001006243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008928876,0.000041565218,0.000033801065,0.00025406733,0.000010628568,0.000011615665,0.004603459,6.21349e-7,2.3783379e-8,0.02139117,0.80233175,0.17131238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038545255,0.000020698502,0.000031143063,0.0002991739,0.000092073016,0.0000022570214,0.005406928,0.0000011731855,0.0000038042297,0.0008921459,0.9929433,0.00026875507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010741028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19061156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016871543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090237666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244171339","doi":"10.3138/9781442630116","title":"Implementing and Working with the Youth Criminal Justice Act across Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05342773392366959,"score_gpt":0.27048694531601164,"score_spread":0.21705921139234205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244171339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017093976,0.0008148383,0.000042978678,0.00012196084,0.00011671699,0.00021124982,0.00008781746,0.000018184548,0.99687684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0770068,0.00022552405,0.00006335776,0.000046063906,0.00025314154,2.0738706e-7,0.000003716855,0.000012482799,0.92238873],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987372,0.00007806362,0.000086577886,0.00023968557,0.00043851743,0.000419914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991281,0.00022129536,0.00023612047,0.0001923896,0.000114439994,0.00010764747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036306202,0.00014865937,0.00019856865,0.0000030627598,0.0014377254,0.00006264393,0.0005120878,0.00009559917,0.00005849152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000137367515,0.00011402591,0.00004352279,0.0000012924698,0.00057309953,0.000120127115,0.0002963157,0.00012485142,2.3776234e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053521525,0.000011658063,0.00016192802,0.00062925275,0.00033025088,0.00014596547,0.79611176,0.0000015438201,0.000010144851,0.06192251,0.036204956,0.103934795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015131153,0.000023444742,0.000057259687,0.0003174069,0.0006128077,9.065847e-7,0.05313399,5.0305204e-7,0.0000039881647,0.000009922227,0.94552755,0.00016093151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90932256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005722159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009126869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244225838","doi":"10.22215/etd/2001-04791","title":"Designating \"Dangerousness\": implications of indeterminacy in Canada's dangerous offender provisions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04754216035098004,"score_gpt":0.34378178603086584,"score_spread":0.2962396256798858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244225838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59605765,0.000536975,0.00016401579,0.0015596623,0.00063107914,0.0011360652,0.00003449856,0.000056899837,0.39982313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98279196,0.00015875543,0.00042668846,0.000068904585,0.00007980121,0.000093941184,0.00009953244,0.000021124522,0.016259303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820316,0.00012978309,0.0004829337,0.0003119607,0.00049034954,0.00038179322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986986,0.0003829045,0.0003008582,0.00024779342,0.00025527502,0.00011458936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035420348,0.00017358431,0.0003218134,0.00015891256,0.00028899062,0.000035230056,0.00044611804,0.00018767721,0.00033731048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038710656,0.00017682639,0.000052081992,0.00053620327,0.000057400444,0.0001591375,0.000020694904,0.00024670342,0.000004360666],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011121263,0.00037366274,0.06221749,0.0007633558,0.00006712082,0.00010420145,0.06189532,0.00007580964,0.001914002,0.047424555,0.014271791,0.8107815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008675668,0.00020580206,0.4554711,0.00274913,0.0003604506,0.000014763551,0.42652038,0.00008761099,0.0022138087,0.013175686,0.09566629,0.0026674096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99973637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80811405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007692362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060266578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245173030","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2235669","title":"Prescribing Greater Protection for Rights: Administrative Law and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Reservation of rights; International human rights law; Administrative law; Human rights; Right to property; Business","score_opus":0.02980456805583189,"score_gpt":0.2709683516265878,"score_spread":0.24116378357075588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245173030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935176,0.00019652794,0.0002500666,0.0023736027,0.00016344406,0.00059253187,0.0000033245697,0.0000040654004,0.002898833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.00002297904,0.00001963753,0.000019266068,0.00015553822,0.000015797554,1.6525674e-7,0.0000026746256,0.00047221748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990875,0.00008028982,0.00013066725,0.00008566361,0.0001263407,0.00048953126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996172,0.000024150588,0.000108154214,0.0000473586,0.0001351708,0.000067943736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006068196,0.000055212848,0.00008361285,0.000032449505,0.00086799206,0.00005478193,0.00007527208,0.00005912772,0.000016768012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021611302,0.00003485577,0.000034402587,0.000052487987,0.0002903257,0.00029084983,0.000006309015,0.00027299015,3.534712e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067103785,0.000021237627,0.0012658814,0.000027976985,0.000085341555,2.879142e-7,0.012968953,0.0000013063561,0.0025454597,0.9810859,0.00015526976,0.0017752587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004870904,0.0007997418,0.0036948316,0.00012823756,0.000079721176,0.00009418505,0.0052037355,0.00006837223,0.0054788888,0.9745931,0.0092169065,0.00015516373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6236525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95789516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3342426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022578635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056781917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66759807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245675147","doi":"10.5040/9781472560346.ch-006","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms : A ‘Direct Driver’ of Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Canada?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.0746993679230497,"score_gpt":0.30367415095886374,"score_spread":0.22897478303581403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245675147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000592146,0.0019223789,6.0299396e-7,0.0023684495,0.0003494043,0.00038193326,0.000088372064,0.0000046598743,0.9942921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521768,0.0009175365,0.000014022438,0.0002947913,0.00023150381,0.000011360362,0.000011956011,0.000013832872,0.0463282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839926,0.0001176878,0.00047481677,0.00019891413,0.00058051746,0.00022883456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839723,0.00035241293,0.0005354769,0.00020678346,0.0003453352,0.00016277842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013352641,0.00014076137,0.00045873513,0.000096059935,0.00027083876,0.00010022628,0.0003509972,0.0001623116,0.000084167856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040418076,0.000111867266,0.00007322262,0.00002944237,0.00059099565,0.00019919538,0.000033069486,0.00029372476,5.674746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039935316,0.0000053204017,0.00015566815,0.0016496406,0.00008388118,0.000018007526,0.0061314735,1.1682182e-7,0.000018755813,0.87211925,0.0978616,0.02191634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073203526,0.000043410895,0.00030612102,0.00648483,0.00006136445,0.0000012354102,0.00022971736,0.0000012572344,0.00007035345,0.005490195,0.9870931,0.00014522913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95158464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038726203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005608281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99488497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245722510","doi":"10.1353/cpp.2012.0001","title":"Failures in Children’s Protection in Newfoundland and Labrador: From the Hughes (1991) to Markesteyn and Day (2006) Inquiries and Beyond","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.024924525213883594,"score_gpt":0.27886246890319694,"score_spread":0.25393794368931333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245722510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8882023,0.0011971997,0.0000021109645,0.10859679,0.00006117245,0.00034505242,0.000043742108,0.000009786893,0.0015418534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969704,0.00013786356,0.000023990171,0.0021026155,0.00049123133,0.00003716711,0.000005300708,0.0000071993973,0.00022420647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988352,0.00019116132,0.00012157043,0.00019083457,0.000119169155,0.00054205797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990843,0.00013077898,0.000027855718,0.00011645114,0.000019298353,0.0006213095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076366996,0.00010152458,0.0001176467,0.00028452984,0.000400668,0.0003810359,0.00013299048,0.0000923015,0.000024011895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087067287,0.00008577535,0.000008821707,0.00042729426,0.00046888695,0.0007116867,0.000048356524,0.00013151382,0.000003966342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004016753,0.0000053680337,0.8873257,0.000003385289,0.0000044025833,9.4388815e-7,0.023205934,7.6104776e-8,0.0000053746076,0.05873437,0.00153422,0.029176213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010243332,0.0000114513505,0.8080371,0.000014227516,0.000003094737,0.0000045639945,0.0028047715,0.000001490078,5.0250327e-7,0.0014856377,0.18743867,0.00009604135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98352426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18590446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032309716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005407047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3674338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246569697","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274260.003.0009","title":"Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Business","score_opus":0.04007442190304661,"score_gpt":0.28126322383446534,"score_spread":0.24118880193141873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246569697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000014079936,0.00016143723,0.000003407819,0.007975304,0.00031359572,0.00005686862,0.0000057883667,0.000023634333,0.99145854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013073129,0.00015593633,0.00003671048,0.0009893611,0.00030795552,5.914911e-7,0.0000020506022,0.0000074029044,0.98542684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993034,0.0000033941155,0.00007784191,0.0001188308,0.0003593017,0.00013722494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970126,0.0000352705,0.000030900883,0.00009328615,0.000042481268,0.0000967848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007766905,0.00007592681,0.00009417108,0.0000111578765,0.00018125934,0.00002323547,0.00016149723,0.00010114841,0.0141179105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018971155,0.00007115555,0.00003567671,0.0000063524253,0.00009842519,0.000032392454,0.000017507598,0.000098526456,0.00017718384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7590845e-7,3.7513433e-7,6.912641e-7,0.0000035163039,0.0000025973516,0.000020584512,0.0000853133,3.143081e-7,5.528877e-8,0.8890008,0.10974731,0.0011379932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010992544,0.0000031573452,0.0000029024834,0.000039870705,0.000008709205,3.0001783e-7,0.0000620952,1.9753418e-8,8.7501456e-7,0.07036211,0.9294124,0.000096515076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99626076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81966513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045509447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048509617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246814161","doi":"10.7202/1021771ar","title":"Avis de congé chez les commis de magasin","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05393345813758487,"score_gpt":0.3097705559380063,"score_spread":0.2558370978004214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246814161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5272561,0.0053437375,0.008032674,0.18281919,0.0009044637,0.00026940182,0.000036724003,0.0001384019,0.27519932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88237333,0.00054736465,0.0010687202,0.00025979662,0.0006854625,0.000008985556,0.000007134677,0.000015732736,0.115033455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802595,0.00068121083,0.00028337573,0.00022540073,0.0002519334,0.00053209753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833655,0.0009535035,0.00012531431,0.00023064238,0.000095605326,0.0002584055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013286129,0.00016021264,0.00018057197,0.0000628072,0.0011589216,0.00012375471,0.00030833494,0.00065499346,0.0026314496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011266274,0.00018380936,0.000102682854,0.000484437,0.0010631272,0.0002615236,0.000053667773,0.00066022744,0.00065691903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108263675,0.00014617594,0.10869653,0.000011665169,0.000042160875,0.000009470941,0.017251555,0.0011285931,0.00006676271,0.5182653,0.17224886,0.18212213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015451366,0.000047218553,0.012228909,0.00018674736,0.00012118074,0.000012703606,0.006411291,0.0016888281,0.00014323699,0.0060797282,0.97270876,0.00021686961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013170053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00172238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8004599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038398258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005373278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247566433","doi":"10.1163/9789004355972_013","title":"Slow and Not-So-Steady: Canada’s Long Journey toward Protecting Children from Corporal Punishment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Political science; Law; Human rights; Supreme court; Constitution; Government (linguistics); House of Commons; Punishment (psychology); Convention; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06009175591358088,"score_gpt":0.2816462978030799,"score_spread":0.22155454188949905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247566433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03904977,0.00097568554,0.000119651646,0.014728151,0.0013735805,0.0016269141,0.00017531042,0.00016536422,0.9417856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4834263,0.0002884841,0.0005074249,0.0010685271,0.0020749802,0.000009902007,0.000038673843,0.000046978734,0.51253873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977587,0.00006406938,0.00034597673,0.0005322652,0.00087107276,0.0004279353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988177,0.00013142734,0.00030465264,0.00024289497,0.0001537863,0.00034954993],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006033156,0.00031519434,0.0003995194,0.000047985515,0.0010376105,0.0003552593,0.00038817854,0.00030692035,0.0029504113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116680705,0.0002877278,0.00008411485,0.000022008371,0.0004754116,0.00018879688,0.00017410818,0.0005194543,0.00005683696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042385102,0.000073664036,0.032060724,0.00032144174,0.00124911,0.000761895,0.063560784,0.0000034014713,0.000051891042,0.30753833,0.4358476,0.15810728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039179227,0.0001791782,0.011382439,0.0010254831,0.00029938598,0.000025912512,0.002741438,0.000009008229,0.00013925714,0.012578011,0.96977925,0.0014488394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.954988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98213106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5339316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042551718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019607076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248185039","doi":"10.4324/9780203727850-10","title":"Restorative justice implemented: the Canadian and Belgian case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0822843929015191,"score_gpt":0.35251850281402647,"score_spread":0.2702341099125074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248185039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034808312,0.0002699119,0.000014175002,0.021060184,0.00022167353,0.00023798604,0.000031325155,0.000018575387,0.9781114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18783705,0.0001467801,0.000046963716,0.0015771607,0.00047390143,0.000004572289,0.0000050659996,0.000012552814,0.80989593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990824,0.000056921166,0.00013471978,0.00021062233,0.00024074611,0.0002746105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999041,0.00025838093,0.000071008486,0.00018710102,0.00012163294,0.00032087034],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068112003,0.0001374976,0.0001337629,0.000051869218,0.0022150343,0.00016854351,0.0001795686,0.0001641421,0.0016819184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110202986,0.000096972246,0.000037633345,0.00001985701,0.00053326035,0.000060702012,0.000041951815,0.00022965288,0.00012079283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016013436,3.6240513e-7,0.0000054372354,0.000010179655,0.000009793714,0.0002558457,0.0039148093,5.7687167e-8,5.0283465e-8,0.9215994,0.0705007,0.0037017944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026419497,0.00002477185,0.000008804506,0.000029258139,0.00013907925,0.000069622954,0.0047840155,0.0000023220985,1.4125942e-7,0.005815024,0.9889587,0.00014181178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91091985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91845804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021491706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006159362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248566805","doi":"10.7202/1022627ar","title":"Le code criminel et les unions ouvrières","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08118531510652602,"score_gpt":0.3298272211039969,"score_spread":0.2486419059974709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248566805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03283307,0.005577531,0.008920431,0.46728906,0.0015230443,0.0002443622,0.00007421252,0.00014651631,0.4833918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8389821,0.0008454495,0.00061375235,0.0003589003,0.0005392853,0.000011653783,0.000021214408,0.000020120124,0.1586075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978245,0.0007331036,0.00035612588,0.00031796668,0.0003463448,0.0004219805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978474,0.0013319368,0.00014721247,0.00030903172,0.00015461784,0.00020984035],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096587447,0.00019058406,0.00020839825,0.000101612364,0.0016722535,0.0001320799,0.00033770816,0.0006256558,0.00085865654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012897981,0.00021476514,0.000120474586,0.00061864505,0.0010124138,0.0005228986,0.00008826485,0.0007508428,0.00061960396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032290268,0.000101567464,0.0015009992,0.000003926661,0.00001894681,0.0000016287884,0.0034083521,0.0017963258,0.0000103925795,0.8769278,0.090559565,0.025667274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016617551,0.000048587397,0.0022215112,0.00018149032,0.000103655075,0.0000045438987,0.009755253,0.00097440335,0.000045428525,0.0099890055,0.97626114,0.00024883382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017161343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007469259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88570154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007232052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072574674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248870123","doi":"10.5040/9781472561145.ch-003","title":"Tapping Reeve, Coverture and America’s First Legal Treatise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Tapping; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03222923112311438,"score_gpt":0.25783515834891585,"score_spread":0.22560592722580147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248870123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041733292,0.0003855315,0.00017377922,0.008564826,0.00050798577,0.000256092,0.00003707926,0.00018858859,0.9898444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022931598,0.00017304564,0.00029103993,0.0019320378,0.0015938111,0.000015407772,0.000035624194,0.000057806654,0.97296965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783427,0.000062794425,0.0003254978,0.0005948653,0.0007159785,0.00046658827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983693,0.0004304291,0.0002983338,0.00038811832,0.00017837883,0.00033546376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006752121,0.0003408622,0.00047226893,0.00013904546,0.0010459556,0.0035133075,0.0005531562,0.0005339981,0.0003967279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007115535,0.00033658766,0.0001512129,0.000024278772,0.0006415896,0.0010282568,0.00020213016,0.0007190234,0.00007578073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015698144,0.0000030543154,0.000020698804,0.000069164635,0.000031829517,0.000038179227,0.0035062993,5.282542e-7,0.0000048818474,0.6455012,0.3115137,0.0392948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011666252,0.00003798016,0.000024829033,0.0005114677,0.00007628329,0.000008798237,0.00021971946,0.000008768189,0.0000018782317,0.0059241387,0.99266845,0.0004010004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01370036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6811548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015997376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028703743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249036407","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_100805","title":"Crimes Judged","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06634229812553699,"score_gpt":0.3286206930148595,"score_spread":0.26227839488932253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249036407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003364254,0.00025629342,0.00013559674,0.003578954,0.00040641153,0.0000916235,0.0000015346841,0.00011151378,0.99541473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009153241,0.0002843502,0.00014180453,0.0007211032,0.0007990409,0.0000015891346,0.0000026747055,0.000015837913,0.98888034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991014,0.000019580726,0.00013258978,0.00020689656,0.00035174683,0.0001877676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942446,0.00013813612,0.00006217643,0.00018538172,0.00007703277,0.00011280457],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034946873,0.00012548559,0.00018632438,0.000036817775,0.00027745953,0.000066470886,0.00026455612,0.00023299136,0.0119282175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077126686,0.000111750654,0.000113502334,0.000008444176,0.00026680206,0.000047090034,0.000039100596,0.0001439913,0.0032181223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017172365,8.9754184e-7,0.0000018098721,0.0000068873846,0.0000048655374,0.0000024722308,0.0003180961,3.180748e-8,9.798449e-7,0.85670435,0.13559386,0.007364026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018381626,0.000013561317,0.0000050983103,0.000045102483,0.000027362234,3.715443e-7,0.00007900065,2.8154977e-7,0.000004650236,0.06808951,0.9315619,0.0001548263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022230514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044888956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.795968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045129218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012563937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249580651","doi":"10.7202/1027850ar","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud, Code civil du Québec et Code de procédure civile, 2000-2001, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2000, pagination multiple, ISBN 2-89127-509-8 Henri Brun, Pierre Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne. Législation, jurisprudence et doctrine, 13 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 1187 pages, ISBN 2-89127-502-0 Commission des Nations Unies pour le droit commercial international, Annuaire, Volume XXIX : 1998, New York, Nations Unies, 1999, 469 pages, ISBN 92-1-133620-1 et Rapport de la Commission des Nations Unies pour le droit commercial international sur les travaux de sa trente-deuxième session, 17 mai-4 juin 1999, New York, Nations Unies, 1999, 62 pages, ISSN 0251-9151 Nicole Duplé, Droit constitutionnel : principes fondamentaux, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 1 édition 2000, 545 pages, ISBN 2-89127-505-5 André Gouron, Juriste et droits savants : Bologne et la France médiévale, Aldershot, Ashgate-Variorum, Collected Studies Series, 2000, x + 304 pages, ISBN 0-86078-816-4 Luc Huppé, Le régime juridique du pouvoir judiciaire, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2000, 246 pages, ISBN 2-89127-520-9 Dominique Loslier, Marie-Andrée Miquelon et Sylvie Théoret, Mesure disciplinaire et non disciplinaire 1982-1998, 4 édition, Collection Atout-Maître, Montréal, SOQUIJ, 1999, 793 pages, ISBN 2-7642-0118-4 Ejan Mackaay (dir.), Les certitudes du droit, Montréal, Thémis, 2000, 278 pages, ISBN 2-89400-126-6 Mary Jane Mossman (dir.), La montée en puissance des juges : ses manifestations, sa contestation / The Judiciary as Third Branch of Government: Manifestations and Challenges to Legitimacy, Montréal, Thémis, 1999, 468 pages, ISBN 2-89400-135-5 Ouvrage collectif, Théories et émergence du droit : pluralisme, surdétermination et effectivité, Montréal, Thémis, 1998, 266 pages, ISBN 2-8027-1140-7 Solange Pelletier, Injonction 1987-1998, 3 édition, Collection Atout-Maître, Montréal, SOQUIJ, 1999, 455 pages, ISBN 2-7642-0113-3 Service de la formation permanente, Barreau du Québec, Développements récents en droit familial 126, Montréal, Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1999, 410 pages, ISBN 2-89451-368-2","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Police Service","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02278431880880574,"score_gpt":0.2661045867963369,"score_spread":0.24332026798753117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249580651","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16503984,0.4672148,0.047640823,0.2692006,0.0019721633,0.01473954,0.024504324,0.0028855244,0.006802407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3265381,0.6151237,0.0053381957,0.0016002739,0.00087398035,0.003015324,0.021280177,0.0007325399,0.025497766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671171,0.0135986535,0.0061035967,0.0046259505,0.0045782547,0.003976494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748697,0.010814043,0.0059223785,0.0025037052,0.003666514,0.002223651],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010978022,0.0045499783,0.004115266,0.003340554,0.013903192,0.0034418516,0.0031692623,0.0031822165,0.00026912158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066947853,0.0054612304,0.0014235508,0.0061446787,0.004155636,0.010648929,0.0014961539,0.0050056106,0.00008995418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033751985,0.008441014,0.029264381,0.0027720572,0.0021061297,0.0008534891,0.05147184,0.024528433,0.0022515028,0.0048624338,0.85919553,0.010877998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014383958,0.0014538504,0.16482009,0.010600374,0.0028125995,0.0034391624,0.02260288,0.017095283,0.0006391462,0.009407803,0.746869,0.005875829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6242378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.958892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3346542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012431542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016115751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250209088","doi":"10.7202/1027241ar","title":"Claude Dallaire, La mise en oeuvre des dommages exemplaires sous le régime des Chartes, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2 édition, Montréal, 1995, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2003, 377 pages, ISBN 2-89127-583-7 Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), La solitude en droit privé, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2002, 302 pages, ISBN 2-89400-152-5 Madeleine MAILHOT, Les bons mots du civil et du pénal, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002, 296 pages, ISBN 2-89127-581-0","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Art history","score_opus":0.02109684088473684,"score_gpt":0.2507895418561821,"score_spread":0.22969270097144523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250209088","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14981796,0.6976213,0.0063309735,0.106067255,0.0020502696,0.0053502144,0.005454818,0.0028077834,0.02449942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1433295,0.7061151,0.015048979,0.0019266128,0.004452928,0.0014439718,0.0033806087,0.0011738499,0.123128414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97428024,0.005585046,0.004653338,0.005107448,0.0036385674,0.0067353398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837985,0.0036158783,0.0026462474,0.0044696373,0.0018943067,0.0035754465],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067559443,0.0039403625,0.004422707,0.0013199472,0.008037611,0.003142485,0.0043375813,0.0036949753,0.0032598444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042207274,0.0050668987,0.0023350532,0.0042159515,0.005417847,0.0062202443,0.0014566765,0.0050494056,0.003608874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009892364,0.006367835,0.0022957975,0.0024542925,0.0013481489,0.003525459,0.01455736,0.0106889205,0.0024854296,0.022483679,0.91692144,0.015882397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060297633,0.00065352255,0.012997499,0.005637618,0.002316453,0.0038741918,0.0038677084,0.00056357495,0.0002569233,0.02071275,0.93793124,0.005158731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2196783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52849805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30881974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004450197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021555235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253056947","doi":"10.3138/9781442630116-011","title":"6. The Implementation of the Youth Criminal Justice Act in Newfoundland and Labrador: No Problem?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.034397820982944534,"score_gpt":0.2768044702031529,"score_spread":0.24240664922020838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253056947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018507866,0.0005285089,0.000005266781,0.00011059537,0.0001334176,0.0003571724,0.000059849914,0.000006907746,0.99694747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1313505,0.0020905298,0.00007498134,0.00001730268,0.00012254712,3.8060276e-7,0.000001830922,0.000011269742,0.8663307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992189,0.00007289633,0.00013079475,0.00015215263,0.00028029375,0.00014498977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925625,0.00014940741,0.0002534168,0.00017473078,0.00012327955,0.00004290163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028232925,0.0001008866,0.00014802856,0.0000086584405,0.00038064193,0.000020720203,0.00039967423,0.00009947298,0.000093098664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012641541,0.00007029052,0.000064097585,9.979788e-7,0.0006097962,0.00013341192,0.00016482835,0.000081023354,9.1465273e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021880073,0.000007766129,0.00032498207,0.00023720312,0.000053178752,0.0000033448173,0.16683462,2.466814e-7,0.00003845345,0.7973952,0.0005307563,0.03435542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053818885,0.00009261292,0.0017893652,0.0004902379,0.00072027085,5.85856e-7,0.022200285,8.373275e-7,0.000015670992,0.0015578547,0.9723959,0.00019818726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60534596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8187663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9718651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023859902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016191074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3972821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253206351","doi":"10.3138/temp-utlj-barkow","title":"LAW VERSUS POLITICS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Discretion; Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Legal doctrine; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.04343393329329004,"score_gpt":0.2977326394517626,"score_spread":0.25429870615847255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253206351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026638094,0.0009690221,0.00009108496,0.0009304466,0.00093033473,0.000030670155,0.000003462285,0.000015560541,0.97039133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698824,0.00027946936,0.00078801345,0.000056305424,0.0004824778,5.432802e-9,2.9938155e-7,0.0000023678658,0.0014027955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992398,0.00008869747,0.00006440614,0.000046797468,0.00026911777,0.00029117733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993933,0.00007700552,0.000072897245,0.000071038,0.00010206267,0.00028369026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003769983,0.00004597513,0.0000860646,0.0000056994877,0.0012284125,0.000022865152,0.0002443883,0.000052949494,0.0020711226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024480485,0.0000524073,0.00008126082,0.000014401268,0.00042145076,0.0010819483,0.000038249607,0.00008416034,0.000027672004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045912024,0.000034138564,0.00030689253,0.0000028908307,0.000015677244,0.0000062307868,0.010691139,7.31605e-7,0.000014711135,0.98628384,0.0021648717,0.00043294867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029582396,0.000048848633,0.0005336021,0.00001515697,0.000045150922,0.0000053116987,0.032092962,7.55928e-7,0.00002288651,0.0005209437,0.96634823,0.000070328286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3463433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37184495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003770361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055254306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254083702","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3694046","title":"Generation and Deployment of Common Law Police Powers by Canadian Courts and the Double-Edged Charter.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Common law; Software deployment; Engineering","score_opus":0.028941471522397573,"score_gpt":0.29046797558901405,"score_spread":0.2615265040666165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254083702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91324407,0.004485225,0.0000652397,0.079151444,0.000076225384,0.00017179015,0.0000034946943,0.000007688279,0.0027948096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462444,0.0038443587,0.0000033755084,0.0012259585,0.00018836158,0.0000016934628,0.0000011651628,0.0000049160503,0.000105754116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988266,0.000120758916,0.000130755,0.0000897361,0.000182334,0.00064980367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996079,0.00003493925,0.00007129732,0.000042901316,0.000038170554,0.0002047557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010560614,0.00006113648,0.00010779832,0.000015417276,0.0006190007,0.00008669499,0.00012128637,0.000035771875,0.0000118061935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010446376,0.00004590786,0.000024784129,0.000049250262,0.00026912874,0.00014413267,0.000011749035,0.0003500395,0.0000012577477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012029039,0.000009410096,0.000596192,0.0000039304923,0.00005035788,8.920624e-7,0.018964348,0.0000026019925,0.0007734886,0.97477853,0.0019148147,0.0027851325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019888844,0.0027838931,0.0020469094,0.00017339055,0.0010305959,0.00052889483,0.1804896,0.0019423298,0.004040815,0.18915501,0.59623075,0.001688958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47342408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8746003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78562355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021833717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008286244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5300824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254710195","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.1.119","title":"CHOICES AND APPROACHES: ANTI-TERRORISM LAW AND CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM AFTER SEPTEMBER 11","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Civil liberties; Law; Political science; Kingdom; Civil society; Commission; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Counter terrorism; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.06355987544218396,"score_gpt":0.2555994116095605,"score_spread":0.19203953616737657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254710195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972268,0.0006898985,0.000032860284,0.0010309671,0.000038183378,0.0001144048,0.000004099226,0.0000068248323,0.02581479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997802,0.0014702393,0.00019004225,0.00038754052,0.000038496848,1.6487272e-7,0.0000013114264,0.0000030697367,0.0001071349],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999029,0.00036220497,0.000101315214,0.00011899272,0.00020653075,0.00018196611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994614,0.00020186137,0.00010694691,0.000084099585,0.00006174841,0.00008393961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001113613,0.0000879352,0.00014253793,0.000016973296,0.0009726433,0.0000936932,0.00022962756,0.00006859626,0.00015107385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010081293,0.000058535636,0.00005286117,0.0000664786,0.0018547064,0.00059040694,0.00008594867,0.00016490537,3.4716857e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003803376,0.00010664849,0.043738667,0.000059743736,0.00011128613,0.00005222474,0.6947969,0.000008269611,0.0000052295763,0.25941813,0.0010468655,0.0002756757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020524573,0.00009010868,0.08951489,0.00015285151,0.00021894832,0.000046058678,0.45696267,0.00044100813,0.0000046347773,0.0021317266,0.44814458,0.00024005676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5726361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6480589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44709772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045870365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017884868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7480885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255165646","doi":"10.7202/1021482ar","title":"Congédiement illégal — Délai de la plainte en vertu des articles 21a et 21b de la Loi des Relations ouvrières de Québec","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03131557184515169,"score_gpt":0.32409260854840205,"score_spread":0.29277703670325034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255165646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84576833,0.0050570657,0.02437581,0.032254342,0.00020804838,0.00024940516,0.000030110114,0.00013549552,0.0919214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674933,0.0014579347,0.0061950553,0.0002927903,0.00031446895,0.000030097792,0.0000068123923,0.00003044026,0.024179079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953661,0.0028000139,0.00045840445,0.00031773502,0.00034313035,0.0007146181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911712,0.007868142,0.00016022094,0.00025319698,0.00017021592,0.00037702973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003940585,0.00024991517,0.00023033645,0.00012431618,0.0017255363,0.00029272106,0.00034081325,0.00072202197,0.0009711172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007159654,0.0002688002,0.0001519614,0.00054294354,0.0032717765,0.00059035036,0.000105917854,0.0008894634,0.00030183443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040062274,0.000299087,0.25525448,0.000020215968,0.00013487841,0.00002060869,0.07911751,0.019427193,0.0001730709,0.56503737,0.022626316,0.05784922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041713016,0.00013898815,0.07643456,0.0006142081,0.000335317,0.000051632676,0.0228389,0.0071390835,0.00040636008,0.053715687,0.837505,0.00040312525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08185071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047582958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8148787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016468489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024599254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255172578","doi":"10.21991/c9vt00","title":"The Role of the Federal Court in National Security Issues: Balancing the Charter Against Anti-terrorism Measures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; National security; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03150337659570767,"score_gpt":0.2847661601787739,"score_spread":0.2532627835830662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255172578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14285743,0.008739363,0.0027193555,0.09406155,0.0074387463,0.0031239854,0.0003417068,0.00020537782,0.7405125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840033,0.00023886036,0.000039636598,0.00083985936,0.00020981306,0.000093766605,0.0000067796755,0.0000054251223,0.00016553591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997038,0.00029012898,0.00055911765,0.0003137307,0.0011471459,0.00065187487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847424,0.00033067548,0.00024365456,0.0003136122,0.0005358946,0.000101949016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018543506,0.00021730647,0.00022815901,0.00007207577,0.0043667676,0.0001325138,0.000908165,0.00015412006,0.00006378855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009705561,0.0001284328,0.00023414036,0.00038139842,0.009844953,0.0005708665,0.00018910336,0.00038989706,0.0000384001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030294965,0.000053545686,0.062404796,0.000004866044,0.000029586068,0.0000027088697,0.0020701298,0.00007705835,0.00008062139,0.932233,0.0024836129,0.0005297926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068524334,0.000027042683,0.018898154,0.00030607963,0.00004178587,0.000052010666,0.040271416,0.0005942431,0.0010026231,0.25593704,0.6817356,0.00044877143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023191397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010611517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026163892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018372126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255256504","doi":"10.7202/1028077ar","title":"Jean-Louis Baudouin, Yvon Renaud, Judico, Code of Civil Procedure, Montreal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2000-2001 &amp; 2001-2002, 1215 pages (each), ISBN 2-89127-540-3 H. Brun, P. Brun, Chartes des droits de la personne, législation, jurisprudence et doctrine, 14 édition, Collection Alter Ego, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2001, 1237 pages, ISBN 2-89127-537-3 Éric Dunberry, La preuve et l’archivage des documents électroniques, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2000, 148 pages, ISBN 2-89127-517-9 Yvon Duplessis, Jean Hétu, Loi sur les cités et villes, Collection municipale et de droit public, Brossard, Publications CCH Ltée, 2001, 300 pages, ISBN 2-89366-371-0 Ysolde Gendreau (éd.), Les fictions du droit, Fictions in the Law, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2001, 145 pages, ISBN 2-89400-138-X Y. Jégouzo, Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques, Annales du droit 2000, Droit public, Paris, Dalloz, 2000, 223 pages, ISBN 2-2470-4157-4 Ouvrage collectif, Code Criminel / Criminal Code, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur Ltée, 2001, ISBN 2-89127-542-X Ouvrage collectif, La coopérative d’habitation et la loi, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2000, 314 pages, ISBN 2-89127-482-2","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art history; Art; History","score_opus":0.06405020907221162,"score_gpt":0.30585663854812656,"score_spread":0.24180642947591494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255256504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093802206,0.43921158,0.09121957,0.1523848,0.0035106237,0.026333245,0.049560297,0.0073487866,0.1366289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.095281914,0.6870375,0.011593823,0.0033792842,0.0017498664,0.0070932987,0.02037175,0.0014456512,0.17204687],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94623137,0.018942762,0.009436464,0.008370347,0.006273385,0.010745657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961022,0.012941678,0.0075117345,0.0064531025,0.0072518806,0.0048195943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02050503,0.0066651786,0.0069002016,0.006144971,0.014345476,0.008505753,0.005855495,0.0058428035,0.0042117415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015837088,0.008377638,0.0031603444,0.015309767,0.008839318,0.014114291,0.0016006092,0.01078968,0.00063481147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018842831,0.016421217,0.0061467807,0.0021919708,0.0022920372,0.000669084,0.023720773,0.022699062,0.0022750546,0.028418018,0.8916284,0.001653313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010805533,0.0013833484,0.014554473,0.0056409924,0.0042555826,0.005098551,0.007134,0.013802784,0.0002145965,0.011487795,0.9178201,0.0078022787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40971386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9450998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5353859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017906133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014405867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255663690","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000012232","title":"The Historical Analysis of Criminal Codes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Criminal law; Code (set theory); Face (sociological concept); Penal code; Political science; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0707177499783157,"score_gpt":0.3285282453521934,"score_spread":0.2578104953738777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255663690","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009867302,0.74555916,0.0000024344522,0.0026712138,0.000103890285,0.00008125321,0.0000011871623,0.000013085663,0.25058103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10964267,0.8497957,0.00006283243,0.0030245995,0.00009703382,0.000015331749,0.0000019602187,0.000005193389,0.03735465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918544,0.0001578989,0.00021118886,0.00011601502,0.00020483727,0.00012462631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950886,0.0001573602,0.00006463241,0.00015339539,0.00004413179,0.000071594935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007358844,0.00005493998,0.0002843579,0.000015738782,0.000389434,0.000008444233,0.00015465058,0.000026267293,0.0015489304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048931084,0.000038317507,0.00014627783,0.0001610404,0.00046822443,0.000065086424,0.000008038385,0.00005424585,0.000015015667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001767032,0.000039425344,0.00012373742,0.00058398343,0.00010456369,0.000004133403,0.0029638966,4.3026125e-7,0.0000055959813,0.78492016,0.10526904,0.10596738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013514797,0.000015267491,0.00020716425,0.00014283558,0.0011169394,4.6376877e-7,0.00004760148,0.0000017679354,1.8678122e-7,0.00012360995,0.99828,0.000050687875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010888066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011638393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028712375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000588174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255719593","doi":"10.7202/1027004ar","title":"Nabil N. Antaki, Emmanuel Darankoum (dir.), La justice en marche : du recours collectif à l’arbitrage collectif, Les Journées Maximilien-Caron 2006, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2007, 210 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-236-0 Tara Collins, Rachel Grondin, Véronica PlÑERO, Marie Pratte, Marie-Claude ROBERGE (dir.), Droits de l’enfant / Rights of the Child, Actes de la Conférence internationale, Ottawa 2007, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2008, 555 pages, ISBN 978-2-89127-831-7 Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly (dir.), La santé et le bien commun, Droit, biotechnologie et société, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2008, 275 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-251-3 Maurice Martel, Paul Martel, La compagnie au Québec — Les aspects juridiques, Édition spéciale (livre 1), Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, Martel Ltée, 2007, pagination par chapitres, ISBN 978-2-923355-07-8 Louis-V. Sylvestre, Le régime de protection du territoire et des activités agricoles au Québec et la pratique notariale, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2008, 495 pages, ISBN 978-2-89127-883-6 Tribunal des droits de la personne, Barreau du Québec (DIR.), L’accès direct à un tribunal spécialisé en matière de droit à l’égalité : l’urgence d’agir au Québec ? / Access to a Specialized Human Rights Tribunal: an Urgent Need to Act in Quebec?, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2008, 58 pages, ISBN 978-2-89635-144-2","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Art; Cartography; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.015293662422623857,"score_gpt":0.2708860277881537,"score_spread":0.2555923653655298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255719593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6048841,0.11580966,0.013207731,0.20260994,0.0026107992,0.018536096,0.016590403,0.0027133632,0.023037905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77131706,0.16676766,0.010156529,0.0016101698,0.0037881245,0.0073275827,0.0064687417,0.00117121,0.03139293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96342736,0.02006095,0.004706833,0.0040615243,0.0028925722,0.0048507396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976448,0.01189011,0.0039890544,0.002713974,0.00223344,0.002725451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014633649,0.003574381,0.0040785125,0.0028138729,0.013127973,0.0035941754,0.0040332587,0.004554981,0.0018347298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010660363,0.004191679,0.0017260782,0.005994347,0.005299498,0.0058088894,0.0011364068,0.007868585,0.00007087665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005620557,0.013387618,0.017532911,0.0016636769,0.0020376863,0.0012698644,0.01368657,0.010795182,0.011822482,0.011368502,0.9034407,0.0073742606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008210694,0.0012836508,0.13502753,0.004436264,0.0026525166,0.0036451132,0.004183046,0.0032052437,0.0029117067,0.0062359283,0.8235382,0.004670119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99784535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20099977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021563303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040888194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255987194","doi":"10.24124/2004/bpgub310","title":"The September crisis: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Anti-Terrorism Act.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Terrorism; Law; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015854123049822772,"score_gpt":0.30048735200890037,"score_spread":0.2846332289590776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255987194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49508476,0.0042975247,0.0000042703136,0.08042053,0.0026248852,0.0010190964,0.00001471577,0.000030452917,0.41650376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537967,0.0008194074,0.0000034789512,0.00035415165,0.00013809658,0.000018351682,0.000006778796,0.00000824948,0.044854805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848866,0.00019113724,0.00023592355,0.00015813377,0.000670158,0.0002559979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987325,0.000620189,0.00017679005,0.0002491913,0.00016893906,0.0000523732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011424778,0.00013104535,0.00019363409,0.000009596484,0.0014014925,0.00013192958,0.00054253975,0.00010610913,0.0001584832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017152383,0.000053598906,0.000080142956,0.00010513648,0.00036870386,0.00007647154,0.000023038281,0.00022046886,0.0000034914337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027115725,0.000031505697,0.0007345597,0.00017626502,0.00024518135,0.00001014844,0.11549433,0.000021710397,0.000027023818,0.24302085,0.63758093,0.002386331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033261318,0.000018197921,0.012410768,0.00016044642,0.00026869596,0.0000022734134,0.44405866,0.000009474197,0.00023986904,0.007966209,0.53426087,0.00027194794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9508504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99755454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45871192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007588671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015689031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256268805","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190664817.003.0032","title":"<i>Charter</i> Remedies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Damages; Harm; Legislature; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Constitution; Habeas corpus; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.06634939697342102,"score_gpt":0.27303228333169144,"score_spread":0.20668288635827042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256268805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014139986,0.0001075248,0.000019339563,0.00034506634,0.00046940712,0.0002190793,0.00004472447,0.00011620869,0.9986645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001337978,0.0014615373,0.000058462992,0.000061373314,0.0004083026,3.3770897e-7,0.000006270918,0.00001960897,0.9966461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876326,0.000034985154,0.00010858415,0.000350274,0.00042633901,0.00031655753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883264,0.00007585175,0.00023651504,0.0005222054,0.00014010399,0.00019267692],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021106284,0.00021983091,0.00028668274,0.00006683691,0.0014530207,0.0001297077,0.000979845,0.00036118194,0.00012013092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030625426,0.0002579963,0.00019235279,0.000001662033,0.0009496653,0.00020754726,0.0002866103,0.00031900592,0.000008699982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003945014,0.000002909005,0.0000028173297,0.000030742412,0.000038388247,0.0001504954,0.0019104012,8.341509e-8,0.0000029313653,0.9669943,0.022078292,0.008749214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011654986,0.000025480285,0.000003150592,0.00021420406,0.00013323882,0.0000014041169,0.00026657656,5.160276e-7,0.000011010356,0.003186655,0.99574924,0.00029195994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015620431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030130697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97367096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014420152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018935857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281632400","doi":"10.3917/tvii.008.0044","title":"Utilité et limites des objectifs de valeur constitutionnelle sur le plan contentieux","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Titre VII","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10167043375871049,"score_gpt":0.2992539409148618,"score_spread":0.1975835071561513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281632400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81890154,0.022095017,0.00025341773,0.019446645,0.0027914988,0.00028531326,0.0002373291,0.00014918853,0.13584007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93447185,0.00077402184,0.0002071094,0.0007151301,0.00020249923,0.000025678577,0.000016272434,0.00001231982,0.063575104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980429,0.0005305177,0.00022474502,0.00030998568,0.00036907074,0.0005227737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990332,0.0004054366,0.00008993721,0.00020175158,0.000094690266,0.00017496063],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009924055,0.00015525633,0.00020447583,0.00005204292,0.0020035787,0.00010261243,0.0003700673,0.00007607954,0.004047789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003277524,0.00017941438,0.00013921027,0.00039634263,0.0012676765,0.000400254,0.00021556468,0.00030804312,0.000267203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013229095,0.00078000105,0.044262495,0.0001940465,0.00009236664,0.0002515136,0.041490864,0.00056977256,0.0009110285,0.79843664,0.100250915,0.012628091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036106046,0.0001641585,0.004746902,0.00009524152,0.00007542115,0.00007672817,0.027392073,0.00029244853,0.0002837986,0.008553392,0.9576875,0.0002712692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06055804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014912873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002876135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010774289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285036526","doi":"","title":"Approche comparative sur l’articulation des sources de protection des droits fondamentaux. Les États d’Amérique du Nord – États-Unis et Canada","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04827481920474505,"score_gpt":0.2794876868798813,"score_spread":0.23121286767513624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285036526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86107355,0.0016784885,0.08202928,0.02370645,0.00018727759,0.0009835236,0.00003946572,0.00015999963,0.030141978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97034603,0.0013786427,0.020842945,0.00016784943,0.000071032104,0.0001679127,0.00016006434,0.00003669384,0.0068288194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852261,0.011394733,0.0007586268,0.0009319806,0.00088787236,0.0008006639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299747,0.0018238472,0.00081496284,0.00085131574,0.0030721533,0.0004402507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007663244,0.0005403045,0.0005711962,0.00012681862,0.0035699345,0.00073905004,0.0010864529,0.00038884467,0.00014917171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019733377,0.00060405413,0.00023825598,0.00076836953,0.0020339945,0.0006548725,0.0004468946,0.0008457356,0.000023173836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012146401,0.0014633404,0.016207013,0.00072341855,0.00021987407,0.00002221987,0.47182724,0.004966282,0.006245687,0.34847435,0.0027448088,0.14698428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019381683,0.000020183099,0.25448048,0.015632786,0.000606677,0.00013080289,0.039862193,0.06939138,0.12257999,0.13148609,0.36008412,0.0037871327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82474494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96436423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43196505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016421148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020340953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285232790","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4139639","title":"It Shouldn’t be Small Potatoes: The Future of Civil Damage Awards under Canada’s Personal Information Protection Legislation. Part Two: Inadequate PIPEDA Damages and the Way Forward","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Legislation; Personally identifiable information; Business; Law; Personal injury; Political science","score_opus":0.019370124000882116,"score_gpt":0.2605029007190654,"score_spread":0.24113277671818328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285232790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36255544,0.004674478,0.0058251475,0.6125661,0.0013653169,0.00131516,0.00004280604,0.00004063021,0.011614886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543285,0.0015937198,0.0000057088328,0.0010984184,0.00042885958,0.000035154364,0.0000057488055,0.0000073167207,0.0013922252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972435,0.00062813656,0.00030817665,0.00011112866,0.00084878755,0.0008602665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991968,0.00015139589,0.0003196531,0.000116528594,0.00015143407,0.000064170905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005085702,0.000120821205,0.00014678627,0.00005408192,0.0028191966,0.00014684998,0.00037314827,0.00003947212,0.00011454968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112638634,0.00007743951,0.00008170468,0.00024598607,0.00028161617,0.0005611401,0.0000779091,0.0014699133,6.465509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005993848,0.000042099353,0.00057043985,0.00003312479,0.00023325761,0.0000029520259,0.08405629,0.0025894106,0.000029142342,0.83500785,0.0101972725,0.066638775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009832293,0.00018712069,0.0007420936,0.00001698351,0.000103698665,0.00011195854,0.35650095,0.0010741603,0.000009280261,0.041572236,0.598515,0.00018330339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33046335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97120506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79343563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011498409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069486005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285274888","doi":"10.7202/1088250ar","title":"La preuve au soutien du contrôle judiciaire des décrets et des arrêtés d’urgence sanitaire en droit administratif","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026580351040807575,"score_gpt":0.29847303889224247,"score_spread":0.2718926878514349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285274888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428265,0.00512016,0.00104541,0.007687255,0.00081055175,0.00042527102,0.00017051671,0.00014554245,0.041768793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775188,0.0007632675,0.0005305464,0.0009896996,0.0004087418,0.00012525206,0.000023519868,0.00005285933,0.019587308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949914,0.0017376115,0.0005056857,0.00066751806,0.000850495,0.0012472835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972548,0.0014146132,0.00025782918,0.00037624777,0.00013609658,0.0005604014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029434233,0.00038207372,0.00048011105,0.00009208371,0.0036649972,0.00022707017,0.001007769,0.00046600954,0.0013398613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011582193,0.0004924478,0.0003186015,0.0006743292,0.005611865,0.00063993875,0.00024355948,0.0013427609,0.00009857138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020763575,0.00034798757,0.02146364,0.00030399655,0.00014426958,0.0010672257,0.34600398,0.00030414024,0.00020730933,0.5023139,0.0036787805,0.12395715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007644709,0.0011398089,0.030436581,0.0005732659,0.0005205006,0.0006951354,0.2793858,0.0005547004,0.0003141358,0.290518,0.393707,0.0013905976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024810717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029467031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3900282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005425934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014638777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285547894","doi":"10.7202/1088287ar","title":"Les impasses théoriques et pratiques du contrôle de constitutionnalité canadien","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04619538886680562,"score_gpt":0.34984692042985843,"score_spread":0.3036515315630528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285547894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035968125,0.022234498,0.0006135188,0.16349751,0.0027152244,0.00013237573,0.00015013317,0.00006370159,0.77462494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818441,0.009564815,0.0013226726,0.0021617417,0.0011734461,0.0000054849274,0.000003465432,0.000014350042,0.003909881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968703,0.0013236323,0.00044648504,0.00024862727,0.00042822878,0.0006827554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788,0.0004287754,0.00024184579,0.00014574603,0.0007464526,0.00055719225],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001841201,0.00020905177,0.00031601902,0.00003105315,0.0055299136,0.00043361334,0.00027863507,0.00021100431,0.0014816491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007762337,0.00020422367,0.00020448373,0.00020399017,0.0010111947,0.000997248,0.00006610472,0.00059415057,0.000033594544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014987402,0.00009522318,0.0015840405,0.000045420562,0.00007442847,0.0014493816,0.0021905522,0.000034467655,0.0000718439,0.9844378,0.0050183064,0.0049835006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022349964,0.00010258383,0.00060765,0.00053544133,0.000112458,0.0029403702,0.006190577,0.000021581705,0.0013791998,0.017113648,0.9705196,0.00025336744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31669822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8674748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087281625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079382904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289463007","doi":"","title":"Sécurité et justice au Canada","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.026635952695675973,"score_gpt":0.27728934493214175,"score_spread":0.25065339223646577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289463007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10565428,0.0026738574,0.011150361,0.19201,0.0035085746,0.0005763121,0.00017383674,0.00018056008,0.6840722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87757444,0.0021827745,0.010695055,0.0010142489,0.00035942305,0.000050566392,0.00020337016,0.000055292006,0.10786481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850821,0.011100446,0.00071125384,0.0010699744,0.0011573089,0.0008789187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890509,0.004274725,0.0006708271,0.001993315,0.0034346918,0.00057549047],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01112727,0.00047679764,0.0005051565,0.00007915737,0.0017729902,0.0004599194,0.0023639917,0.0004203768,0.0013257195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004533143,0.0005490148,0.00023674959,0.0006147101,0.0014304147,0.00032398317,0.0014277408,0.0008906998,0.00028875683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011427665,0.00027349722,0.0013257295,0.00031367707,0.000057145215,0.000015099758,0.02435287,0.000034090368,0.00011185318,0.9315174,0.03113651,0.010850666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021156092,5.0959255e-7,0.00456774,0.0030070737,0.00024588368,0.000010688422,0.0013610597,0.0012943989,0.0018302283,0.0053010625,0.9815048,0.0006649752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008128443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071269297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290189911","doi":"","title":"La réforme du code de procédure civile du Québec","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020040763061136224,"score_gpt":0.2593977219082596,"score_spread":0.23935695884712338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290189911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27528393,0.0028746307,0.0278971,0.22760798,0.0008433778,0.00084587384,0.000119348486,0.0004290514,0.46409872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9352109,0.0030818998,0.008906668,0.0004292538,0.0003217273,0.00012321562,0.000106339096,0.00006573139,0.051754303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857926,0.010761283,0.00071789214,0.001051604,0.00081011985,0.0008664939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99039483,0.0037521357,0.0007046623,0.0017388783,0.002874205,0.00053531665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014691928,0.0005047376,0.0005384711,0.00011633941,0.0017136716,0.00069325994,0.002588054,0.0007008491,0.0021972328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044966214,0.00054682384,0.0003900282,0.0005739801,0.0027273318,0.00043104688,0.0014940483,0.00096480164,0.0008570684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004998823,0.00126787,0.034318235,0.0005193699,0.00013899866,0.000034008866,0.16672526,0.000045934972,0.0005382192,0.69906515,0.05437397,0.042923007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030844705,0.0000012744728,0.010296673,0.0028391064,0.00013618662,0.00004723381,0.0016290301,0.0031822268,0.0032407923,0.00537125,0.9722951,0.0006526819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21938892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5033163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091029675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033790153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290644151","doi":"10.32920/19642794.v1","title":"Sin of Omission - Coded Data and List and Description of Immigration and Refugee Board files in Data Set","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Credibility; Law","score_opus":0.19980529521079823,"score_gpt":0.4022193607713374,"score_spread":0.20241406556053917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290644151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943841,0.0015170216,0.00014202402,0.0016891995,0.00010381071,0.000283628,0.0012079423,0.0000114026725,0.00066088873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230933,0.004543121,0.0013285535,0.00001811185,0.000029275412,0.0000037218579,0.0013304522,0.000004448558,0.00043299288],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986682,0.00022144835,0.0002915817,0.00046065662,0.0002645674,0.0000935711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989653,0.00015258093,0.00018660475,0.000609275,0.000034958142,0.00005128049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015277591,0.00009116266,0.00023425675,0.00006945111,0.000120255805,0.00007473619,0.00045794417,0.00011007644,0.00013499965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038175183,0.00008511759,0.000008394564,0.000078802914,0.0002716034,0.00046494012,0.0026803834,0.0001574507,1.0045043e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002219124,0.0007853715,0.42257088,0.009158723,0.00019056273,0.000039828006,0.14902318,0.000076463264,0.037700184,0.06346913,0.19731256,0.11745401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020338544,0.0004661649,0.2729151,0.0037854367,0.0006676836,0.00001106006,0.1636968,0.05542568,0.0013379264,0.02661924,0.4712483,0.0017927814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06480143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10217162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2739357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025253381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012052546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94142616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291253996","doi":"","title":"New tainted-blood class actions in Québec and Alberta.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Commission; Settlement (finance); Political science; Law; Certification; Public administration; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.044788089395322854,"score_gpt":0.2811699016765171,"score_spread":0.23638181228119426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291253996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47664335,0.0005916193,0.00004187896,0.029527543,0.0003127619,0.00045461906,8.400027e-7,0.000038814975,0.49238858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739175,0.00007432955,0.000046765534,0.0001641955,0.000058104637,0.00008580238,1.9812094e-7,0.0000032591772,0.025649864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936783,0.000069745765,0.00007948754,0.000120198994,0.000102173784,0.00026055056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956167,0.0001765539,0.000019637517,0.00006609021,0.000013566169,0.00016251211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028878558,0.000044499702,0.00006483085,0.000033407403,0.00014234657,0.000046984747,0.00006883893,0.00004198855,0.0001242897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000797445,0.000043863314,0.000018429027,0.00016201963,0.00007480497,0.0001607745,0.000009640885,0.0000717831,0.000013830541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026046451,0.00014222875,0.19884902,0.000018496268,0.000028265888,0.000018390632,0.018299717,0.000005631682,0.000030140776,0.5504391,0.025418866,0.20672409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014681838,0.000004371757,0.1023692,0.0000041962617,0.000014337327,0.0000026322923,0.0018988879,7.2068417e-7,0.00004702365,0.0012387572,0.8941987,0.00007435882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5192476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89533263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86877984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006538945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018385143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48395377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293289980","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7017409","title":"Ontario's Consumption Treatment Services Model: Problematizing Conservative Safe Consumption Site Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Business; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.10786028051701646,"score_gpt":0.32533443625957037,"score_spread":0.2174741557425539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293289980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8391742,0.00017730535,0.0014472798,0.008120117,0.00015374116,0.0017077363,0.00047711827,0.0010259881,0.1477165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216855,0.00021367731,0.0003223671,0.00032380226,0.00008801254,6.1092493e-7,0.00077511993,0.00029357566,0.005814277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977799,0.0006868618,0.00024130789,0.0003620058,0.000543018,0.0003868936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990879,0.000050302977,0.00015846659,0.00024203265,0.00029038396,0.00017088477],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009288968,0.00013225312,0.00014903105,0.0001935419,0.00815252,0.0005868198,0.0005297807,0.00004095472,0.019943457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112488044,0.0001471672,0.000055681227,0.00033090587,0.00024856758,0.0004515844,0.0005846296,0.00020245784,0.0027647512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008583969,0.0011252036,0.0023664793,0.00058523123,0.00023911141,0.00006979433,0.52942854,0.008489314,0.0074920617,0.31993768,0.05495491,0.0744533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041032085,0.00023610907,0.0009905014,0.00003711606,0.000029050727,0.000029779967,0.0032521887,0.0016536178,0.000051065406,0.000887933,0.99223864,0.00018365908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023332069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027257174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93728375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019077339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004974845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294321759","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.9","title":"Legalizing Illegal Mass Surveillance: A Transnational Perspective on Canada’s Legislative Response to the Expansion of Security Intelligence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Legalization; Political science; Legislation; Democracy; National security; Soft law; Public administration; Perspective (graphical); Corporate governance; Law; Political economy; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.02586694613372424,"score_gpt":0.2994757318317242,"score_spread":0.27360878569799996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294321759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8046766,0.00066348247,0.00019548844,0.17192714,0.0012401461,0.00041603393,0.00057794596,0.0000064858345,0.02029671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958432,0.00003870405,0.00007222284,0.0033765533,0.00015671978,0.000008920915,0.0000029171028,0.0000130327735,0.000487756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997794,0.0006817111,0.00037562047,0.00022987595,0.00041509187,0.00050375727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735326,0.00083986146,0.0002448907,0.00015045,0.0006124921,0.0007990725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00376887,0.00014358711,0.0003160788,0.00006848701,0.0018433792,0.00006807258,0.00047338902,0.00006542719,0.00016358151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000527004,0.00014198225,0.00021229265,0.0003424079,0.00045873172,0.00019499981,0.000021444464,0.0006072309,1.8073355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010655345,0.000006128894,0.000069685055,0.000011398908,0.000046986417,0.000062713414,0.29384533,0.0006835064,0.000034563847,0.70321006,0.0017555057,0.00016755836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024040492,0.00038908972,0.001288758,0.000066421046,0.0000354352,0.00006612947,0.60683274,0.00010010089,0.00003460426,0.01268895,0.37797764,0.00027974136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6905211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004053109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010275937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296009488","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4209817","title":"Remedying Unreasonable Delay","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.021686829442083513,"score_gpt":0.30041932320209314,"score_spread":0.27873249376000964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296009488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81634825,0.017179122,0.0024080083,0.03774543,0.0019342515,0.000317913,0.000003364778,0.00017996377,0.123883694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811564,0.002073017,0.000039579194,0.00022046387,0.00043073326,0.000007975222,7.4975213e-7,0.000009800581,0.016061282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674815,0.00029416493,0.00014593668,0.00013195636,0.00060897734,0.0020707867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995944,0.00007362266,0.000088828965,0.00008792428,0.000053632462,0.00010162564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005208229,0.00006753128,0.00009004163,0.000057002388,0.0031269328,0.000077374505,0.00042997164,0.000024149713,0.0005653551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015121867,0.00006962944,0.00008417896,0.00027264518,0.00006699236,0.00024149212,0.00007253709,0.0015454093,0.000035284233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039257215,0.00003798652,0.0011239054,0.0000014303095,0.000029340868,0.000022025963,0.0028473535,0.00013916718,0.000079431855,0.97856605,0.0023726646,0.01474138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017526047,0.00017772899,0.000056665544,0.000006324187,0.0000249391,0.00043188504,0.048260592,0.00001740372,0.00001376189,0.28401282,0.666673,0.00014962089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027196885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008719136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69455326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021109367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038945961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297439865","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2005.tb02194.x","title":"Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Commission; Butcher; Government (linguistics); Biography; Political science; Balance (ability); Dissent; Toll; Law; Management; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06663271940801403,"score_gpt":0.33926621713222466,"score_spread":0.27263349772421064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297439865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020791183,0.013887816,0.00008994125,0.7493216,0.00033957863,0.0003983347,0.000013901415,0.00008661741,0.23378313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714149,0.0010308985,0.0002497969,0.007065819,0.0007419364,0.000022632737,0.000026505237,0.000005794462,0.019441703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989928,0.00010162475,0.00019103459,0.00016928068,0.00017621552,0.00036905808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989795,0.000035890604,0.000060900606,0.0001577165,0.00007450824,0.00069150014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056637754,0.00007558188,0.00009472357,0.00008207709,0.0006183876,0.00024091911,0.00020739174,0.00008517596,0.009010556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000380828,0.00008160186,0.000043234755,0.00018660216,0.00012619862,0.0007809112,0.000005110646,0.000089251254,0.0012311606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.803808e-7,0.000007174348,0.00020130264,0.0000037135408,0.0000015626441,0.0000044424914,0.00023176121,4.1038998e-8,0.0000040931745,0.19203289,0.7841796,0.023332436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029527593,0.000021183452,0.00017376369,0.0000119385495,0.0000051677553,0.0000034290053,0.00020899244,0.000010130078,0.000016145223,0.00015129274,0.9992677,0.00010072169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010365933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85820425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037075422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021911804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298311304","doi":"","title":"(2012) 30 Windsor Y B Access Just 225 RE-EVALUATING INDEPENDENCE: THE EMERGING PROBLEM OF CROWN-POLICE ALIGNMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Independence (probability theory); Crown (dentistry); Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.46387740870988653,"score_gpt":0.6213644238508419,"score_spread":0.15748701514095537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298311304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137314,0.020876074,0.00044104186,0.0028058102,0.0014041144,0.001358037,0.000027983242,0.00006470596,0.059290852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151796,0.0056652557,0.00024926424,0.00046657506,0.00079936325,0.000081018676,0.0000024498054,0.000041927695,0.0011761623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337107,0.0011689175,0.001258247,0.00046126285,0.0027175527,0.0010229781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540937,0.0010127305,0.0017666821,0.00062217115,0.0007164566,0.0004725998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011100821,0.00035887602,0.00073076034,0.00038664925,0.00150836,0.0017046762,0.0059321295,0.00019344235,0.018375983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006380967,0.00027728637,0.00024958348,0.0013491822,0.00057534425,0.008073111,0.00180925,0.00056589936,0.000029275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029299883,0.0006333753,0.7925161,0.00036894312,0.0003343384,0.000008501228,0.039199956,0.00031688702,0.021582454,0.005321452,0.09322019,0.046204768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072042,0.000061269755,0.7570369,0.0028979648,0.0008919501,0.000021648377,0.03292499,0.00010127996,0.035361666,0.013874229,0.15402421,0.0017318545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035300292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020641936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0777866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020064495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005184718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301376184","doi":"","title":"Power and wound: A study of the intersection of privilege and disadvantage in &lt;italic&gt;Symes&lt;/italic&gt; v. &lt;italic&gt;Canada&lt;/italic&gt;.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deep Blue (University of Michigan)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.007694148817736251,"score_gpt":0.21606177887173528,"score_spread":0.20836763005399903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301376184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927853,0.00042004147,0.00013162626,0.0011651727,0.00043947913,0.0008445699,0.00014926003,0.000039366554,0.0040252055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806106,0.00015177894,0.00007139385,0.00007169526,0.0000555923,0.000002445186,0.0000056339823,0.000027207461,0.0015531724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678737,0.00041963707,0.00050103763,0.00072031777,0.0009700943,0.00060154306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979276,0.00036767754,0.00056506717,0.000630155,0.00023725966,0.00027222547],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008521173,0.0003776919,0.0007174633,0.00024159343,0.00057595066,0.000050517494,0.0009039892,0.00023322723,0.00013091482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023278686,0.0003343854,0.00018506404,0.00067706616,0.0013766766,0.0010700256,0.00059025007,0.0002240232,0.0000060316975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013753106,0.0022118364,0.042100906,0.0004699838,0.0007008359,0.00023517344,0.76198393,0.000027497876,0.115084976,0.06909918,0.0014482908,0.005262068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005957653,0.001876063,0.27404156,0.0010790946,0.00064109446,0.000057120065,0.6516975,0.00021641394,0.0013526697,0.0012823992,0.06023436,0.0015640464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051446255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9441826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8927364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030141606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030726736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302095910","doi":"10.22215/cpopp.v1i0.2734","title":"Confronting Caligula: Toward an Effective Ethical Infrastructure for Local Governments in Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Carleton Perspectives on Public Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Environmental planning; Critical infrastructure; Public administration; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.059354006868062595,"score_gpt":0.37049255061901804,"score_spread":0.31113854375095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302095910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85430646,0.00019444796,0.0034294683,0.036021095,0.000631685,0.0015373289,0.000053184896,0.00015906946,0.10366723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996581,0.000008585155,0.00025138856,0.0012874486,0.0006747712,0.000103639504,0.00000750608,0.000021439255,0.0010642159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972119,0.00043655248,0.0002396396,0.0005954008,0.0007568953,0.0007596307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983681,0.00031362465,0.00010729971,0.00025380697,0.0003374988,0.00061968685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014726997,0.00022958488,0.00033699375,0.00020546697,0.0002902868,0.0002560483,0.0004585171,0.0004295795,0.00006119414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035437199,0.00022471837,0.00012140602,0.00033683647,0.00069736136,0.00057215994,0.00008462857,0.0008144097,0.000012203169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022415287,0.00013262799,0.007442435,0.00001011219,0.000027599,0.000009517064,0.2708242,0.00007676974,0.000035953508,0.70789623,0.0025169705,0.0108034415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027960911,0.0012304212,0.092935495,0.00008426377,0.00003582887,0.000008252828,0.5514485,0.00028190628,0.00010688746,0.032999124,0.31727505,0.0007981463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.430094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35234475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6748971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008459085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026653935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99534726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302571571","doi":"10.3138/9781442609556-005","title":"1 The Evolution of Human Rights Protection in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.0365873133703862,"score_gpt":0.2778207153715336,"score_spread":0.24123340200114737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302571571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016407132,0.00019532687,0.0000061512233,0.00029571418,0.00045373157,0.0005801569,0.000010051141,0.000024051908,0.9820277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636222,0.0000033640267,0.00000106173,0.0000023146436,0.0002953449,0.000012124666,0.0000015635607,0.0000072124612,0.363455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984107,0.000081752245,0.00036409078,0.0002612464,0.00060486334,0.00027735817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991552,0.00007973262,0.00028581102,0.00027916653,0.00012843491,0.0000716119],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037653153,0.00016916396,0.00022575188,0.00008147848,0.002352873,0.000029853647,0.00036892318,0.00017487175,0.0005065229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006670359,0.000101090736,0.000076127224,0.000029579916,0.00041912458,0.000115381044,0.000030178691,0.00023156693,0.00003767058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006695612,0.0000039989477,0.000009693545,0.000013221877,0.000008171035,0.000008307028,0.0003357155,1.4031261e-7,0.000036686706,0.9978305,0.0015758056,0.00017106686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006311753,0.000026605905,0.00023509724,0.00028498628,0.000012816088,4.5293967e-7,0.000028694396,2.5113522e-7,0.000040347073,0.50556946,0.49361283,0.00012535646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98749256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6198149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002405751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005833516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310248845","doi":"10.1177/13657127221139506","title":"The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.16063495164697966,"score_gpt":0.401471797130705,"score_spread":0.24083684548372536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310248845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81932676,0.022405386,0.00009402185,0.13797149,0.003479937,0.00055764645,0.000015105923,0.000011302058,0.016138349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973862,0.0012881474,0.000035166675,0.00048876205,0.00024237765,0.000010649659,2.9365862e-7,0.00000448381,0.00054391904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.0005191089,0.0005521976,0.000084270425,0.0015726653,0.00021409092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968446,0.0019861117,0.0006277148,0.00012760842,0.00035057217,0.00006338525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005091595,0.00006564947,0.00013811071,0.00009372317,0.00035795206,0.000089526446,0.0017651743,0.00002163767,0.00021411164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002049268,0.000036776015,0.000111169786,0.00023227929,0.00034152667,0.00052791403,0.00022802365,0.000417519,0.0000025239547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077135814,0.0008267563,0.25441468,0.00005294472,0.0005463035,0.00076050253,0.16360652,0.0020079731,0.0052209473,0.34689948,0.080658525,0.13729182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008646782,0.0008391315,0.048188694,0.00088579516,0.000047869027,0.0001231939,0.06830055,0.00009700289,0.0022920868,0.036184452,0.8419053,0.00027125262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002268112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090758724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76124674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025472298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001121927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311063081","doi":"10.29173/wclawr74","title":"Remanding Justice for the Innocent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plea; Innocence; Criminal justice; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Economic Justice; Law; Value (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.10825764446537754,"score_gpt":0.3963334976963441,"score_spread":0.2880758532309665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311063081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007277581,0.32913563,0.0029411374,0.5367778,0.006273512,0.005678591,0.000032764496,0.00026520595,0.11816762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86202365,0.09604395,0.00006382815,0.03316792,0.0011150943,0.0011614661,0.000009365409,0.00002316403,0.0063915704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986555,0.00042317013,0.00020935416,0.0001441191,0.00035436323,0.00021351852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998733,0.00074359635,0.00012571174,0.00026418507,0.00009613112,0.00003739843],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036934523,0.00007266003,0.00013153715,0.000007893123,0.004728459,0.000056811907,0.00046439588,0.000014335511,0.0011173111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028436867,0.00004339978,0.000099358214,0.0003073683,0.00020631395,0.00011348419,0.00009768769,0.00016616823,0.00005373298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012330814,0.000010551291,0.0000043137256,0.0003294628,0.000012252594,4.3950777e-7,0.0009702898,0.000025251818,0.0000050230924,0.9539373,0.037259363,0.007433421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053589418,0.000026630974,0.000016746077,0.00016708225,0.00031783732,0.0000056529284,0.0019607302,0.000048691443,0.0000029126518,0.0010025057,0.9963321,0.00006553652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013748306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006164566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001419514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070350354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311063134","doi":"10.29173/wclawr77","title":"Conviction Integrity: The Canadian Miscarriages of Justice Commission","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Innocence; Economic Justice; Appeal; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Conviction; Criminal justice; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.08386865433143473,"score_gpt":0.3660994438326292,"score_spread":0.2822307895011945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311063134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004399157,0.09881565,0.00007751566,0.43607053,0.0042185877,0.0027602022,0.00007533679,0.00015646331,0.45342654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146564,0.0109285535,0.000010015632,0.005185941,0.00019407156,0.000088658926,0.000009542912,0.000009348389,0.002108214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727684,0.0014458847,0.0003192384,0.00016399303,0.0005486231,0.0002454361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986799,0.00035914872,0.00020584768,0.00038638443,0.00024245746,0.00012629227],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003861909,0.00010528895,0.00021159521,0.000025584559,0.0044569336,0.00005452626,0.0006065989,0.000042919677,0.0026477098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003600385,0.00006643238,0.00010037435,0.00054141897,0.0005168815,0.00014207137,0.000086505854,0.00049047655,0.00005908658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017678265,0.000026052525,0.00010011348,0.00048976316,0.000026830776,0.000002618755,0.003437184,0.000025727844,0.000033598615,0.9269233,0.062107414,0.0068097347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053123185,0.000036718142,0.00020013217,0.00031241003,0.00027225117,0.000011802786,0.0035059697,0.00002424971,0.000016598377,0.0006533661,0.9948309,0.00008245263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60003287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.542816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032789394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004610851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312286105","doi":"10.17223/2312461x/35/4","title":"A judicial identity: the Canadian Metis before the courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Computer science; Art; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03600102426211883,"score_gpt":0.3197562625729193,"score_spread":0.28375523831080046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312286105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04525559,0.007076259,0.00015428802,0.37312287,0.016060742,0.0025954787,0.00017641127,0.0004691074,0.55508924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849669,0.00005148472,0.000045243105,0.002421891,0.0016100374,0.00016158113,0.000009089092,0.000035295398,0.010698476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995787,0.0007313689,0.00034469564,0.0004376857,0.0017655969,0.0009336371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828357,0.0003148616,0.0001823234,0.0006663437,0.00019723982,0.00035566787],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039040854,0.00022654339,0.00024683686,0.00012814828,0.01500277,0.00040404848,0.0020260413,0.00010081185,0.0025357539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068316684,0.00016380852,0.00022884982,0.0011092152,0.00070679863,0.00043954042,0.0003387834,0.00078219315,0.00027580088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023725506,0.00006049046,0.0015107065,0.000008172383,0.00006595128,0.00013729115,0.05724369,0.000048297625,0.000015288833,0.6728856,0.26300818,0.0049926084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010805297,0.0000698062,0.0016679133,0.0000060441166,0.0000938339,0.000017958597,0.017423248,0.000015842748,0.000004889512,0.04495106,0.9354463,0.00019500255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.764683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9787415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93971133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002730787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016369311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312410912","doi":"10.7202/1093269ar","title":"De la fiducie de données en droit civil québécois : étude exploratoire pour un outil en construction","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.028089620729622483,"score_gpt":0.2831094994036393,"score_spread":0.25501987867401676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312410912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54460806,0.022678781,0.0036539207,0.10197874,0.0071653435,0.00023698567,0.00015953404,0.0001708145,0.31934783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798008,0.008793745,0.0067029833,0.00086324033,0.0018801448,0.0000062437825,0.0000021450664,0.000032464126,0.001918214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956219,0.0020715771,0.0004869962,0.0003546907,0.0006129841,0.0008518527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978912,0.00078531745,0.00025260603,0.00021288176,0.00030179461,0.0005562413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025976927,0.00026202144,0.00035261625,0.00005048197,0.004399187,0.00042554256,0.00045366827,0.00038581318,0.0020922564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007046411,0.00028691837,0.00030965614,0.00036305317,0.00089432095,0.0008227342,0.0001261925,0.0009876435,0.00013411009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035250065,0.00020893029,0.0018828547,0.000072859,0.0001306258,0.0015380206,0.011319917,0.00011938862,0.00077087345,0.8689837,0.001036827,0.11390078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042953077,0.00007055794,0.0012535853,0.0006093583,0.00024128822,0.0054267906,0.033679824,0.00008427395,0.0034847546,0.06910462,0.88523656,0.000378885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02402027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18864673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8841997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011350916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063324627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313353907","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-19373-6_3","title":"PRC Impacts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Democracy; Charge (physics); Law; Political science; Psychology; History; Physics; Psychoanalysis; Politics","score_opus":0.07409426855794043,"score_gpt":0.34111886048506923,"score_spread":0.2670245919271288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313353907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000073814026,0.0004036184,0.000002308431,0.0044401414,0.00038365024,0.00012124088,0.000007197955,0.00008269575,0.9945518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048316643,0.00090429344,0.00004097241,0.0004943312,0.00037458577,0.0000033164085,0.000005851529,0.000014379168,0.9933306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990137,0.00001709855,0.00010893681,0.00017709436,0.00048909214,0.00019404973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995423,0.00008914553,0.000060304625,0.00015087951,0.00003383266,0.00012354793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032662277,0.00010207848,0.00013254055,0.000038744474,0.00043921766,0.000051712355,0.00025877502,0.00011170126,0.11695337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005473119,0.0000962934,0.00010132382,0.000015686539,0.00013882518,0.00011053034,0.0000865182,0.00020972165,0.0007722485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027103547,0.0000020229345,0.0000026970142,0.0000059652825,0.0000056598833,0.000016355623,0.0008169356,1.1022411e-7,7.4500025e-7,0.9156028,0.08120625,0.002337727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015366913,0.000023755732,0.0000052425735,0.000018765635,0.000018345854,0.0000010563944,0.00023660406,1.0112612e-7,7.8727965e-7,0.03389532,0.9656527,0.00013193989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049269865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065999585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88444644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015868135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027620414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99259496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313426299","doi":"10.1017/s0962728600005856","title":"Canadian code of practice for the care and handling of beef cattle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Welfare","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code of practice; Animal welfare; Code (set theory); Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Engineering; Programming language; Biology; Ecology; Engineering management","score_opus":0.024454810898905954,"score_gpt":0.3256563238841294,"score_spread":0.30120151298522346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313426299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106474,0.0054822923,0.0001374843,0.12583059,0.0002915698,0.0007063751,0.0002623312,0.000022679038,0.05661927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995054,0.000060035458,0.00022458386,0.000096945434,0.00005488254,0.000004922168,0.0000017705904,0.0000026866244,0.00004875636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995803,0.000037878417,0.000078290446,0.000076003584,0.000102165606,0.00012535958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992022,0.00041798849,0.000055547614,0.000070046,0.00019230529,0.00006189949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033144097,0.00003421629,0.0000726928,0.000014808756,0.0004217742,0.000016891678,0.00011330918,0.00003318284,0.000022805758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082711614,0.000026659736,0.00002463499,0.000050942104,0.00012233887,0.0000866946,0.00001277646,0.000032412605,9.31304e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025904618,0.000039805207,0.016120171,0.000432352,0.000063167856,0.0000022271086,0.14644146,0.000035548605,0.0009772021,0.7728327,0.005367465,0.057428874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008566751,0.00020420738,0.007947842,0.00002700358,0.000061585204,8.493876e-7,0.06354943,0.000023729544,0.00036821788,0.00007555778,0.9275994,0.000056570065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5653786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76505274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92223185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025605852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102881095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4375156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313451812","doi":"10.31468/dwr.1009","title":"Commissariat aux plaintes du CIUSSS : la simplification par la communication verbale","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.1260361892928179,"score_gpt":0.4259376307065015,"score_spread":0.2999014414136836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313451812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7168542,0.019842694,0.00014941802,0.19203001,0.00052343507,0.0003706156,0.0001699254,0.00016061243,0.069899045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910664,0.006078055,0.00017205715,0.00046125852,0.00019915571,0.00008137186,0.00010363406,0.000021640572,0.0018164023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658656,0.0017273062,0.00038811137,0.0004069927,0.00039353684,0.0004974683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966171,0.002422791,0.0002516597,0.0004436519,0.0001007826,0.0001640433],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022631944,0.00023124446,0.00030752918,0.000056374614,0.0030154334,0.000281721,0.00068314694,0.00017712166,0.0006195991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047129786,0.0002511939,0.00011722157,0.00029453266,0.0020518,0.00048888783,0.00048163082,0.0006526067,0.000033962668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000797354,0.0006075544,0.041562047,0.00011564808,0.000059729045,0.00007736674,0.020494767,0.0000710121,0.00016200608,0.8439429,0.03585855,0.056968715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055399875,0.00017211091,0.025916997,0.00023015773,0.00025140654,0.00011261445,0.14851281,0.0006452728,0.000097338336,0.024404274,0.79850256,0.00060044037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039817425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000571578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015772933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026701734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316925998","doi":"","title":"Le contrôle à travers le droit : une lecture franco-canadienne: codirigé avec M. H. Prince (Professeur, Université de Montréal (Canada)), Thémis, Montréal (Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0065877675640903365,"score_gpt":0.18971507319634504,"score_spread":0.1831273056322547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316925998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4078439,0.01113311,0.020710265,0.33584377,0.0021743134,0.0015653303,0.00070524943,0.00026357564,0.2197605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92669904,0.0029975441,0.002507021,0.0006610807,0.00012911696,0.000038083585,0.00025452144,0.00007734533,0.06663622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989514,0.0053059775,0.00083886523,0.001433368,0.0013134609,0.0015943528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160194,0.0018241038,0.0009141324,0.0020610585,0.0024335475,0.0011652216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324748,0.0007271167,0.0008657133,0.000112965914,0.0038025272,0.0002758812,0.0028413744,0.00063790684,0.00053689576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011963664,0.00090539927,0.0003291851,0.000905708,0.0015241733,0.00031673533,0.0011956823,0.001191635,0.000035740217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002628612,0.0007658835,0.004169641,0.0003948539,0.0004457878,0.00034920694,0.05776299,0.0010935803,0.0010857664,0.8013135,0.09966581,0.03269009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011404173,0.000002756128,0.01908424,0.0013221985,0.00017736935,0.00004081028,0.0053914813,0.0046880245,0.005890266,0.0044406643,0.9566926,0.0011292183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99950117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85702676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042755934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01795149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318816809","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.14627","title":"Wrongly Imprisoned, Released as a Pauper: Canada’s Ineffective Approach to Innocence Compensation and Avenues for Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Compensation (psychology); Statutory law; Status quo; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Payment; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.06828437774955226,"score_gpt":0.37404854191733944,"score_spread":0.3057641641677872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318816809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848372,0.0010327741,0.0001578649,0.012313085,0.00037470527,0.0002772678,0.000007810554,0.000015201334,0.0009841291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998449,0.00037769598,0.00020168796,0.000246518,0.00028494388,0.000014367926,7.3148965e-7,0.0000066617254,0.0004183927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989341,0.000079191814,0.0002492771,0.00012537083,0.00038356901,0.00022851842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898905,0.0002709598,0.00016429854,0.000054441505,0.00040239195,0.000118891956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085954973,0.00009208266,0.00025716424,0.000069835565,0.00045203642,0.00006824212,0.00014780213,0.0000282557,5.767964e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072962634,0.00007300373,0.000040963114,0.00020370563,0.00011865319,0.00029843493,0.00005574197,0.00010530647,0.000002633876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042585745,0.00039611728,0.20249398,0.0016402554,0.0016393174,0.0005027506,0.56005484,0.0005372152,0.002503468,0.052116923,0.091352895,0.08250366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017546061,0.0021443502,0.33252728,0.00090452377,0.00024576503,0.0001151829,0.23970789,0.00008294598,0.00049299886,0.0020152358,0.41934115,0.00066806754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21631911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45559317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32798827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038084725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038810293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7888995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319780493","doi":"10.17118/11143/19039","title":"Le postulat d’inévitabilité de la notion d’atteinte initiale à la base de l’arrêt Montréal (Ville) c. Dorval de la Cour suprême du Canada","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.004107731597982737,"score_gpt":0.19636284545824592,"score_spread":0.19225511386026317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319780493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83231145,0.0017199431,0.00040215484,0.0075497427,0.00032688383,0.00026831974,0.00007279988,0.00006539997,0.15728328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685438,0.0011468614,0.0005690227,0.000501117,0.00045424965,0.0000044021167,0.00001364818,0.000049455837,0.028717425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961511,0.0014477818,0.00029991087,0.0005289927,0.00040953804,0.0011626804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969307,0.0017002155,0.00015749945,0.00039080548,0.00013693777,0.0006838389],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021084992,0.00032416827,0.00042172507,0.00009522372,0.0006921177,0.00014678042,0.0006396357,0.00058440724,0.00054995506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003726685,0.0004564432,0.00027150242,0.00033826663,0.00061125465,0.00045584165,0.00019902182,0.0006420362,0.00008401042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000919755,0.0005906712,0.10805514,0.0012358716,0.00025222922,0.008658296,0.033387307,0.011818063,0.014903065,0.80185527,0.012490568,0.0058337753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016075618,0.00019311684,0.04051125,0.0007533758,0.0003928332,0.0015247298,0.017771853,0.0055643497,0.0014656724,0.0038350038,0.92550665,0.0008735781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89128023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83707684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086760195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045136386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320028286","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.24","title":"La gouvernance plurinormative des manifestants : reconfigurations pénales, exceptionnalité et dégradation des droits pendant le G20 à Toronto","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.029347618391616724,"score_gpt":0.2842478285658607,"score_spread":0.254900210174244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320028286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92017657,0.01784502,0.00029137635,0.0117099965,0.0014167438,0.00030006922,0.0007617834,0.000014209839,0.047484227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98155034,0.0048127356,0.00047478074,0.0017672786,0.0003415643,0.000020056284,0.000029918985,0.000034924855,0.0109684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967082,0.0010601182,0.00071872014,0.00033144257,0.00027996048,0.00090156624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966785,0.00049492304,0.0006722863,0.00018709239,0.0004858707,0.0014813365],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003219148,0.00028733254,0.00046543984,0.000046512003,0.004009531,0.00028221114,0.0004824216,0.00016838906,0.0009635831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002418695,0.0003716158,0.00036864195,0.0002930628,0.0020483427,0.0021636577,0.00004864009,0.0008196751,0.0000034367422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013810602,0.000046844838,0.00042728044,0.0001722053,0.00011144036,0.00020066198,0.23647034,0.00011179818,0.000028545788,0.7545224,0.0027970865,0.0050975992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088653434,0.0006098237,0.01349036,0.0008246528,0.0002573742,0.0018594876,0.38325644,0.00011362683,0.0000119893175,0.08846672,0.5095095,0.0007134786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76701957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6660557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059323823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043015587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321613926","doi":"10.3138/9781487546052-017","title":"Appendix 1 Previous Titles in the Canadian State Trials Series","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); State (computer science); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; History; Algorithm; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.07501526251061343,"score_gpt":0.28174967665276224,"score_spread":0.20673441414214883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321613926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002124257,0.001518238,6.422439e-7,0.00033684296,0.00013578362,0.0004637216,0.00018903746,0.0000136644585,0.99732083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00305133,0.0019058449,0.000029645224,0.000046904603,0.00005798663,7.1273035e-7,0.000016875674,0.000008879787,0.9948818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987744,0.00028582363,0.00015964996,0.00018376553,0.00039217583,0.00020419723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926215,0.00017075891,0.0001975427,0.0002274979,0.000048409554,0.00009364175],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011865059,0.00012119704,0.00032199957,0.000026965688,0.0005899884,0.000041287873,0.0007287832,0.0001186148,0.0051276456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004341372,0.00011939123,0.00013691201,0.0000013261689,0.00036141108,0.00015325629,0.00009804944,0.0001752127,0.000013760761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010299272,0.000006750918,0.0000065289983,0.00005141097,0.000060311486,0.00015892394,0.10969819,0.000004453096,0.0000010312656,0.84752434,0.03533421,0.007050825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008696617,0.00003486698,0.000013563462,0.00005598247,0.000071375485,9.240345e-7,0.0015254495,2.3614905e-7,0.0000010861451,0.0015646962,0.9965189,0.00012591423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96118474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006427622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006100172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321613957","doi":"10.3138/9781487546052","title":"Canadian State Trials, Volume V","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); State (computer science); Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.05577626392587905,"score_gpt":0.2716416219011151,"score_spread":0.2158653579752361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321613957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009937674,0.001702287,0.0000073479123,0.00016258108,0.000432449,0.0003728982,0.0004393436,0.000039486025,0.9968337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021898486,0.00080660556,0.00005779281,0.000031583335,0.00012763523,4.0842465e-7,0.000028194332,0.000013040715,0.99871576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982873,0.00041621845,0.0001876788,0.0002779049,0.0004918702,0.00033903203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987881,0.0001602494,0.00029632746,0.00027949337,0.000121272344,0.00035451833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010471541,0.00015248464,0.00047768853,0.00003238448,0.0008011575,0.000033367192,0.00085626874,0.00018433288,0.00882023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007752631,0.0002056779,0.00024986418,0.0000017007536,0.00031058534,0.00014575812,0.00017097172,0.0002067231,0.000014065493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010997001,0.000010248723,0.0000078469175,0.00007052131,0.00013787895,0.00014144515,0.058137532,0.0000073925034,0.0000015754903,0.058615714,0.86595476,0.016805092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013502849,0.00004138322,0.0000118841235,0.000046549692,0.00015148641,3.2588585e-7,0.0010554169,0.00000231033,8.662174e-7,0.0004741765,0.997875,0.00020561733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13192017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034985736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003729967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321786296","doi":"10.5463/thesis.194","title":"Outlaw biker crime","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Law enforcement; Extant taxon; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal investigation; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal behavior; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07288184301749688,"score_gpt":0.4168009147166292,"score_spread":0.34391907169913233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321786296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01304656,0.00012933357,0.0000021165854,0.0011614115,0.0027578752,0.00013429768,0.0000023122307,0.00029885574,0.98246723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11471594,0.0002539142,0.0000415602,0.0001247701,0.0004635139,0.000015095063,0.00010472376,0.000020080388,0.8842604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989715,0.000042373304,0.00013321383,0.00020518323,0.00040641864,0.00024127316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.00010832307,0.00005078792,0.00012117716,0.000099701974,0.00008493575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003033514,0.00009846415,0.00013363095,0.00006002293,0.0003439352,0.00010177133,0.00023865259,0.00021330972,0.0022278375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023118246,0.000091227055,0.00009081122,0.00019177796,0.000049446855,0.00009817797,0.000009774153,0.00012922127,0.0047474783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003081839,0.000027346268,0.00014203272,0.00012625991,0.000028336726,0.000029243974,0.03687298,3.3118195e-7,0.00009007417,0.43875226,0.5074807,0.016419658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032263837,0.000014033432,0.0046801725,0.00010317034,0.000049983984,1.0107614e-7,0.053561028,9.473647e-7,0.00012632547,0.0054552695,0.9357264,0.00025029478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02837216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0997741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.433297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000431154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002208711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322390777","doi":"10.5040/9781509940790","title":"Landmark Cases in Privacy Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.108116627465776,"score_gpt":0.33657457990416406,"score_spread":0.22845795243838807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322390777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022122094,0.00015038748,0.0000012330976,0.0030424069,0.0011099179,0.00031304496,0.00004147052,0.00036549973,0.9947548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012891331,0.000039398383,0.000041834894,0.0008006132,0.0015166485,0.000042981672,0.00006139856,0.000058511745,0.98454726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975253,0.00017832265,0.0003661068,0.00048930675,0.00081952283,0.00062146154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978614,0.0012306953,0.00016723473,0.0003975223,0.0001322094,0.00021094114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019950194,0.00023901516,0.0003728185,0.00021342152,0.0004984823,0.0027667233,0.0009841132,0.0005236178,0.00022164991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025175917,0.00024800803,0.00014336592,0.00009507997,0.00037758268,0.0011830211,0.00029804287,0.00083566166,0.000381662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008877427,0.0000064924047,0.000046224628,0.000063868574,0.000008825043,0.00037856546,0.0046066605,3.3744635e-7,0.000001386486,0.4221965,0.57000613,0.0026761463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008012633,0.000016245434,0.0000464751,0.0007244326,0.000019717165,0.000005012109,0.0003536152,8.127365e-7,0.0000023952875,0.02796635,0.9704997,0.00028512167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024682064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13472825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40049356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004596415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012285599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323660945","doi":"10.33137/ic.v15i.40365","title":"Taking Rights Frankly: Justice Iacobucci and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.029295445264535976,"score_gpt":0.29371127566500366,"score_spread":0.2644158304004677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323660945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71454346,0.001591667,0.000004621369,0.050248083,0.0012267836,0.00065522286,0.00016953495,0.000073053285,0.23148754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967607,0.000025950287,0.000018337993,0.00044218803,0.0002326421,0.000008532392,0.0000035907083,0.000007053326,0.0025010016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987952,0.0001003632,0.00015792057,0.00021137059,0.00025697213,0.00047817556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888384,0.00022660235,0.00007060982,0.00017280415,0.00006687006,0.0005792852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006295856,0.00010499358,0.00017365084,0.00015945718,0.0015517657,0.00013946132,0.00022358884,0.00009481666,0.0002647533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014021702,0.00007932622,0.00003740076,0.00036708583,0.0010968229,0.0001785443,0.000019364146,0.00011042552,0.000042114552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020119185,0.0000046441874,0.001584233,0.000067165245,0.00006020134,0.0002075341,0.053259026,0.0000042052843,0.000011566788,0.8661895,0.07646298,0.00212885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070670183,0.000035737754,0.031560834,0.00014487635,0.00020780101,0.000013645163,0.0060935616,0.0002928611,0.000023701143,0.05138434,0.909148,0.00038794242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99458593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99944085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012457628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037891022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360994723","doi":"10.22329/tclr.v1i2.7931","title":"Admissibility of Hearsay Gathered Under MLAT: A Tempest in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Criminal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; State (computer science); Tempest; Political science; Admissible evidence; Work (physics); Resistance (ecology); Engineering; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.08576572488900898,"score_gpt":0.36449516725802383,"score_spread":0.27872944236901487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360994723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6544847,0.02874918,0.000058053116,0.24995832,0.0005789462,0.0023020506,0.00023732384,0.00015466589,0.06347679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959978,0.0024632937,0.000071373135,0.0012048328,0.000026492835,0.000026412772,0.000019670313,0.000007617748,0.00018250327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979309,0.0002631863,0.00047691862,0.00023585407,0.0008061524,0.000286983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990541,0.0004120049,0.000078668265,0.00015789724,0.00015854601,0.00013878965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014482108,0.00011101451,0.00031906902,0.00003808531,0.0001426996,0.000010813276,0.0002635844,0.000039619747,0.00077637227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001458452,0.00010532365,0.00009881326,0.0005917339,0.00018123467,0.00015823722,0.000012146816,0.00012453455,0.000015316948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001464152,0.00003328,0.0004993701,0.0017689092,0.0000060385787,0.00001297395,0.0005281283,0.000030554278,0.00003291464,0.9954814,0.00058068463,0.0010111347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006774669,0.000111541616,0.13240816,0.0049610543,0.0003298769,0.000012612025,0.0043603824,0.000083531515,0.00022410815,0.041064057,0.81496435,0.00080287375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83681524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034135635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024185132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8500732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393004","doi":"10.7202/1098445ar","title":"Vers une théorie de la fin de non-recevoir en droit privé québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Doctrine; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015576148114654527,"score_gpt":0.29426636034274894,"score_spread":0.2786902122280944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16155298,0.0036526558,0.0003022722,0.11145855,0.00734329,0.00028509725,0.0001845029,0.00007976993,0.7151409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888181,0.0014380417,0.0008258481,0.0011232141,0.0014637061,0.000015313819,0.0000021446724,0.00003323548,0.006280375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960606,0.0014462513,0.00040625746,0.00028419413,0.0008462059,0.0009565052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813235,0.0007980385,0.00024885318,0.00019659685,0.00008292656,0.00054125185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039774827,0.00022099764,0.00029180554,0.000060877195,0.008934005,0.00017417832,0.00083909265,0.00017840786,0.0027666283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002475086,0.0002516139,0.00029078347,0.0005449874,0.0006863543,0.0004631934,0.00021584226,0.001482427,0.00011620838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012517821,0.00030136356,0.0008644861,0.000046492358,0.00010292065,0.001187233,0.015933504,0.0024834494,0.00021505138,0.9369422,0.012899809,0.028898269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038143923,0.00024692307,0.0004948108,0.00009275821,0.00012972268,0.0009519839,0.010744863,0.00013909752,0.00015818085,0.02567333,0.96069366,0.00029324825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25214937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1975481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94779384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030863632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057880895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393007","doi":"10.7202/1098443ar","title":"Rééquilibrer le rôle de la Cour suprême du Canada en procédure criminelle","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014494343375557108,"score_gpt":0.26251071006144366,"score_spread":0.24801636668588656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2421885,0.008822604,0.000038843285,0.21786344,0.00750118,0.0003618906,0.00040606488,0.00006951914,0.52274793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98094654,0.0003973499,0.00021062556,0.0011278297,0.0013724035,0.000014849795,0.0000027327976,0.00003435957,0.015893312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957789,0.0016474075,0.00040124863,0.00028249895,0.0010412645,0.0008486331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984244,0.0005394593,0.0002084794,0.00017191183,0.00013960998,0.0005161433],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520966,0.00022356026,0.0002818668,0.000035508645,0.011408737,0.00016479145,0.0007880019,0.000122034675,0.0048533254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020595173,0.0002407839,0.00017010105,0.0002889646,0.0004570154,0.00048824056,0.00026992572,0.001203122,0.000024092147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007947014,0.0002933197,0.0008149007,0.00007133395,0.000069924616,0.0018405908,0.0035608078,0.0017433172,0.00017517715,0.77881765,0.20994973,0.0025838008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003457769,0.00011823293,0.00020738893,0.00004648307,0.00008608,0.002465416,0.017489742,0.0001782609,0.00016242018,0.0026999598,0.97590405,0.0002962198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92063653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9278668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016161217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014036762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393784","doi":"10.7202/1098239ar","title":"L’« égalité des armes » — une expression bénie ? — en droit processuel au Québec : le rôle du droit international","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025749966424812688,"score_gpt":0.28760895523232355,"score_spread":0.26185898880751085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8768862,0.0016682107,0.00049503247,0.05934835,0.0017403498,0.00037990237,0.00006374579,0.0003347276,0.059083473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90729356,0.0019902345,0.00042737962,0.0001511344,0.002591613,0.00009154487,0.000047703572,0.000059001068,0.08734786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659085,0.00023326272,0.0005978262,0.00074599736,0.0006999024,0.0011321576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804455,0.00058445625,0.00027820456,0.00039764564,0.0002536245,0.00044149798],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013622104,0.00028467103,0.00045837546,0.00017944611,0.001053111,0.00022693374,0.0011968527,0.0003546663,0.00060576136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092748797,0.0004306043,0.00030657405,0.0011791401,0.0009447711,0.0011644544,0.00031257243,0.00041757667,0.001379657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031636862,0.0012167775,0.16114496,0.0032338104,0.0002939977,0.0012141746,0.14460945,0.0017036299,0.010245415,0.48057103,0.03248621,0.16296417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011481167,0.00027781358,0.052136827,0.0041341675,0.0002733706,0.00024522663,0.04221511,0.003688565,0.0055075604,0.44103828,0.4477374,0.0015975672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24637541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18832235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41525117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019140538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017347756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366323396","doi":"10.59259/jd.v2i1.27","title":"THE ADMISSIBILITY OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JURNAL DARUSSALAM Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Judgement; Law; Political science; Section (typography); High Court; Admissible evidence; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.029615592900656264,"score_gpt":0.3119752309448825,"score_spread":0.28235963804422626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366323396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96349245,0.00065536256,0.00001169642,0.0058278413,0.0007511094,0.00056580757,0.000052118517,0.000092861286,0.028550772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691993,0.00029625464,0.000061549064,0.00018876136,0.00027910448,0.000096707285,0.000011928011,0.00003046654,0.0021152978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600345,0.00033260143,0.00085136975,0.00057994615,0.0013841348,0.0008485047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981647,0.0005216994,0.00041172418,0.00037920006,0.00020541369,0.00031726595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038847125,0.000271847,0.00041164036,0.0002013025,0.0037224249,0.0002676255,0.0012811259,0.00009319419,0.00037035372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009095224,0.00023702574,0.0002412139,0.0010270108,0.0010209157,0.00056612556,0.00034288684,0.0010134504,0.000006121285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018694265,0.0012163434,0.41588974,0.0004335995,0.00011757016,0.00014745313,0.12990251,0.00011545831,0.008116693,0.39433268,0.042884704,0.004973802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013429823,0.0006466616,0.1453872,0.00018833397,0.00018378685,0.00011057035,0.14582203,0.00026176163,0.0004919006,0.004509066,0.70031476,0.000740946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016354223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038825758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65743005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005890685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061960384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366958521","doi":"10.5040/9781509954308.ch-008","title":"Tolofson v Jensen: Reframing the Canadian Common Law Choice of Law Rule for Torts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11636264669063008,"score_gpt":0.3326545332950051,"score_spread":0.21629188660437504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366958521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013180706,0.000115911054,0.0000019922736,0.008122647,0.0012968616,0.00059952016,0.00017356694,0.00012734607,0.98943037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17606407,0.000010002241,0.00010059868,0.0026980683,0.001455096,0.000057509482,0.000088135836,0.00009180858,0.8194347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774736,0.00007331143,0.0004267749,0.0004078739,0.0007228182,0.0006218831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973451,0.0011420031,0.00031382174,0.00052737683,0.00035921187,0.00031251126],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020253249,0.0002524591,0.00041140366,0.000104760344,0.0021339117,0.001863347,0.0009961354,0.0005866486,0.00008744319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045246162,0.00022191956,0.00023467046,0.000030456584,0.0008198256,0.0006481682,0.00013152469,0.0006289504,0.000032388834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005847803,0.0000018239851,0.000005695427,0.000059257418,0.000025212483,0.000010715461,0.0033127114,6.345199e-7,0.0000052057526,0.9400676,0.054151323,0.0023539716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006278648,0.00002420953,0.000011635575,0.0003430797,0.0000658815,0.0000013427195,0.00029972085,0.000002988214,0.000030098314,0.07508583,0.9238385,0.00023393065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8595867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99150395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035006306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075462495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377225642","doi":"10.1515/9780773571006-003","title":"Introduction: A “Canadian” Bill of Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02222922805592522,"score_gpt":0.22725877265814884,"score_spread":0.2050295446022236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377225642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004111067,0.00000424043,0.00000643162,0.0027969314,0.00056132814,0.00033452574,0.00019523028,0.00006640443,0.9960308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029538784,0.00015372339,0.00012943243,0.00011520889,0.0003935125,5.523066e-7,0.000011798017,0.000022700391,0.9962192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820906,0.00012089223,0.00022516622,0.00052365917,0.00049419183,0.0004270469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984335,0.00007693853,0.0002447459,0.0004728151,0.00035683415,0.00041521294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025344017,0.00028782492,0.00041562287,0.00030439606,0.0010755897,0.000029358307,0.00054000417,0.00049761124,0.0006082674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030010438,0.00029175027,0.0002339507,0.00002729131,0.0006958383,0.00017751248,0.00009370685,0.00037368975,0.00003962729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029385425,0.0000065734466,7.5231526e-7,0.000025539253,0.00006104484,0.00009494709,0.00034104116,0.0000023266862,0.0000011112671,0.93612516,0.06305406,0.00025805846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014531039,0.0000434479,0.0000013984196,0.00009842233,0.00018501181,0.0000017837136,0.00014489822,2.4125904e-7,0.000091202106,0.00755839,0.99137855,0.0003513631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48172858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046059787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92856675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005878685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023944875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239256","doi":"10.1515/9780773571006-013","title":"Arthur Roebuck’s Canadian Bill of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 3 November 1949","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027087363338053796,"score_gpt":0.23915214177056027,"score_spread":0.21206477843250648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047890772,0.000005900323,0.0000012012728,0.00035098864,0.00022696414,0.00042486997,0.0004910805,0.000050617353,0.99796945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09797011,0.00004535323,0.000044289623,0.00013362015,0.00008215318,6.8557455e-7,0.000022237386,0.00002850046,0.901673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806654,0.000106350424,0.00025549319,0.0005528296,0.00049852725,0.0005202297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984964,0.00008222443,0.000256867,0.00037238316,0.00019465311,0.000597467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021612097,0.00036726947,0.00048558586,0.00028047766,0.0017477382,0.000053504784,0.00045444712,0.0005132418,0.00027359597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009481405,0.00037514893,0.00018634876,0.000019523535,0.0011218487,0.00019618103,0.00016000625,0.0003989992,0.0000101837995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020626137,0.000011377676,0.000025985026,0.000037821614,0.00008336325,0.0001636713,0.00063226116,6.509904e-7,0.000007372599,0.990736,0.008161893,0.000118941476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032788856,0.000076510434,0.00003114558,0.00019476298,0.00019542377,0.0000021147446,0.00022368813,3.5290216e-7,0.00008701339,0.0063944594,0.9920093,0.00045735057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78380907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15134259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98434156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005807918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015676042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378385726","doi":"10.1515/9780228002222-003","title":"Finding the Content and Meaning of the Canadian Rule of Law in Its History","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Content (measure theory); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08339818394133315,"score_gpt":0.2359077457332274,"score_spread":0.15250956179189423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378385726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001227917,0.000014888525,2.3544553e-7,0.00096623483,0.0001309898,0.0002754177,0.0000798841,0.000009454811,0.9984001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5580122,0.00006194074,0.000008471449,0.00017568127,0.000022475422,3.3565462e-7,9.842439e-7,0.00000996044,0.44170797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990487,0.00010838751,0.0001516251,0.0002026934,0.00030620213,0.0001823573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992513,0.00013082342,0.00021177008,0.00017798619,0.00010667733,0.00012143746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023468847,0.00013059525,0.00024378317,0.00006518203,0.0005551318,0.0000097330485,0.0004980787,0.0001735091,0.000022596334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040991792,0.00010927835,0.00009988219,0.0000103221455,0.0007301051,0.00007055082,0.00020886173,0.0003153433,7.283362e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015749385,0.0000015347066,0.000015735912,0.000046424095,0.000021321017,0.000021986729,0.0044980515,0.0000019161155,0.000014254061,0.9949849,0.00028273175,0.00009538202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001118739,0.000014150112,0.000042298696,0.00029357747,0.00008068814,2.9921816e-7,0.0008340776,0.0000023262123,0.000106878775,0.00082738564,0.99756646,0.000120005716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67805755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116900176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007271507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002644303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8992141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379017104","doi":"10.54648/gplr2023007","title":"Collection of Personal Information in Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Privacy Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Legislature; Data collection; Control (management); Internet privacy; Law; Business; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.045397490870108595,"score_gpt":0.3535570972028212,"score_spread":0.3081596063327126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379017104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030183006,0.0121734785,0.000005747699,0.035105366,0.00054919656,0.0011682084,0.000075734795,0.00011266696,0.9206266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937404,0.008420012,0.000028864382,0.0020509274,0.000027002348,0.000012988924,0.000015861136,0.0000014286329,0.00006888941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907726,0.000098781966,0.00023283319,0.000073653806,0.0002511352,0.00026633887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996154,0.000026731164,0.00006118564,0.00008520715,0.0000771958,0.00013428851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008969014,0.00005347519,0.00014758356,0.00002610021,0.0002097265,0.000026985694,0.0001737132,0.000043173823,0.00015676163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029285633,0.0000535328,0.000052592568,0.0009466905,0.0001156368,0.00049121556,0.000026755764,0.000048020076,0.00031274473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031522727,0.0000049599603,0.0013040423,0.00063804945,0.0000029372084,0.0000030172246,0.0009409132,0.000001392986,3.4664183e-7,0.96937054,0.021288687,0.006441983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046944824,0.000010178164,0.002248033,0.0008643907,0.000009944257,0.0000013166873,0.00012468411,0.000016025097,0.0000012988179,0.0019001092,0.9947186,0.00005848223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93909544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9304558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039812957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040336407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40198052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379409582","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4453473","title":"Le recours aux clauses de dérogation aux droits et libertés dans un contexte fédéral: l'exemple canadien (The Use of Notwithstanding Clauses in a Federal Context: the Canadian Example)","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); Derecho; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.08274255147069075,"score_gpt":0.3243533674080883,"score_spread":0.24161081593739753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379409582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847535,0.0031378549,0.00024718145,0.10975437,0.0006724166,0.00042983703,0.000033543987,0.000029442397,0.0009418575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98688555,0.0050935014,0.000021498208,0.0010746565,0.00027370977,0.000014551193,0.000008030654,0.00004251738,0.0065859887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346995,0.0013583136,0.0006277513,0.0003256143,0.00057314,0.0036452538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974703,0.001237865,0.00037778247,0.0002628917,0.00026965796,0.00038147293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006426729,0.00027452104,0.00036693516,0.00021440737,0.0031121115,0.00050061836,0.000769432,0.00022006221,0.00005827819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009621966,0.00022133258,0.00019140712,0.0011951358,0.00087261555,0.0009719852,0.00005952678,0.0021198462,0.000022038876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006479788,0.00003503631,0.026395228,0.000014010356,0.00015386689,0.000048512593,0.05516028,0.0006662696,0.00008467167,0.9023905,0.0016723041,0.013314527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016312668,0.00082627684,0.05243208,0.0009369085,0.00028524525,0.0008276813,0.25759757,0.0015413754,0.0001990299,0.3709624,0.311881,0.000879156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5314281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051093707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0383419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379536754","doi":"10.17118/11143/20327","title":"Un rendez-vous manqué avec l’accès à la justice : le projet d’un tribunal unifié de la famille au Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015548908626709905,"score_gpt":0.24639392816977437,"score_spread":0.23084501954306447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379536754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61086965,0.0025114666,0.00081291934,0.017853823,0.00053541467,0.0003724663,0.00007468393,0.00036374727,0.36660582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7500618,0.003643555,0.00075462094,0.0002388377,0.00063236465,0.000009125256,0.000022268136,0.000059926755,0.24457748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961863,0.0010064951,0.0003392867,0.00063714373,0.00042723594,0.0014035517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973842,0.0012449127,0.00019466864,0.00043908667,0.00011809931,0.00061901694],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021559263,0.00035204814,0.0004390343,0.00019680546,0.0017341699,0.00013903806,0.000983222,0.00062590145,0.00043377923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038425828,0.0004816097,0.00033340117,0.0012281685,0.0009171695,0.00039948063,0.00038332844,0.0006775857,0.0005042683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039780058,0.00041155895,0.010168758,0.001572799,0.0002842029,0.009466454,0.08042355,0.0017108391,0.001102284,0.80881006,0.0149757,0.07067603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009096031,0.00013969708,0.015369171,0.0005567222,0.0008233921,0.0005559959,0.020988954,0.0027273973,0.0005016879,0.00559878,0.9511967,0.0006319117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18033326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11419949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.936221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008469102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031236254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380268003","doi":"10.1515/9780773576766-011","title":"Developments in Ontario Minimum Standards Legislation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03373032279070482,"score_gpt":0.25691350326301327,"score_spread":0.22318318047230845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380268003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007554304,0.0000017176275,0.000010816495,0.00021012971,0.00022432535,0.0004276684,0.00009333572,0.000089017034,0.99886745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015445634,0.00009908006,0.00022036252,0.000088558736,0.000054783268,6.648509e-7,0.00002374104,0.000020327514,0.9840469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771285,0.00009177854,0.00026730407,0.00052150077,0.00096525426,0.00044131267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896806,0.00007718628,0.0002247418,0.0002660844,0.00027236526,0.00019155072],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043989057,0.000320301,0.0003917211,0.0002512557,0.0007000036,0.00006351316,0.0005007342,0.0005051335,0.0001109809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002725991,0.000402342,0.00013939301,0.000018560091,0.00024173653,0.00029169716,0.00017290754,0.0005616205,0.000011684422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015401239,0.0000151792265,0.00005568343,0.000017173494,0.00003641984,0.00027076097,0.003394827,0.0000055732758,0.0000010965284,0.9851948,0.00228123,0.008573232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036154166,0.00004475239,0.00029551022,0.00032960385,0.00006943112,4.865918e-7,0.0002902528,3.5666736e-7,0.000014320706,0.0013693939,0.99678147,0.00044287095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26205656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04661528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033540996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097155746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381051785","doi":"10.23977/jaip.2023.060406","title":"The significance and scope of application of the principle of legality in criminal law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Practice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Scope (computer science); Law; China; Criminal law; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Socialist market economy; Limiting; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10252876638725533,"score_gpt":0.43744207577878397,"score_spread":0.33491330939152864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381051785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97762996,0.00075505825,0.0032119378,0.013225635,0.00044518762,0.00042925298,0.0000043529626,0.000005939805,0.0042926497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864686,0.0008754577,0.0003262632,0.00003711092,0.00007649317,0.0000029977373,6.1944476e-8,0.0000033094755,0.00003147973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790776,0.00045033378,0.0008077016,0.00009498404,0.0005886537,0.00015055791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569374,0.0022240048,0.0012311497,0.00017956765,0.00062824955,0.00004327774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059823575,0.000058323778,0.00017805905,0.000047098903,0.00022595536,0.000035681358,0.0004465507,0.000047361413,0.0000065537583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046289074,0.000038215352,0.00007015226,0.0006273026,0.0009511552,0.00052394083,0.00006613671,0.00022780517,0.0000027516794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059138174,0.00018939812,0.0010436451,0.00009675346,0.00002024187,0.0000037552506,0.011968923,0.00078571774,0.024286332,0.9174473,0.000042606604,0.04352393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011914143,0.0007021463,0.015731351,0.00067847804,0.00036435953,0.000033614488,0.14177394,0.0018526048,0.5914474,0.10324661,0.14373481,0.00031553162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053508156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005093602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8142007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039133065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026922158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8088868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381380466","doi":"10.4324/9781003193982","title":"Leading Works in Criminal Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10227840475323487,"score_gpt":0.37280849064948207,"score_spread":0.2705300858962472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381380466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045797195,0.00024728573,0.000016318694,0.0013861533,0.0005893868,0.00012741973,0.0000013559086,0.00015056493,0.9974357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056266007,0.00036062358,0.00006489563,0.0003975114,0.0006732171,0.000008940593,0.0000071929817,0.000023108303,0.9928379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865156,0.000056173285,0.00020488256,0.00028089396,0.00041818482,0.00038829618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929386,0.0003745103,0.000053069838,0.00014400101,0.00003750359,0.00009707508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007154467,0.00013601613,0.00024095518,0.00009879282,0.0002464071,0.00015394243,0.00035202905,0.00033981595,0.0009589914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105322084,0.00013780994,0.00009072042,0.00012655456,0.00032203493,0.00019953065,0.00007233626,0.00040456202,0.002406409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045692436,0.0000045428474,0.000008768973,0.000038917646,0.000003148031,0.000073873176,0.0034437631,0.0000020630275,5.14597e-7,0.86058646,0.13198593,0.003847413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038474413,0.000012404042,0.000016709113,0.000811082,0.000025731637,4.8214497e-7,0.0028924297,0.0000024650715,0.000001265386,0.04727074,0.948709,0.00021919011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009911695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20192187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8167231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000360496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041792452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381380802","doi":"10.4324/9781003193982-3","title":"James Fitzjames Stephen, Digest of Criminal Law (1877)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08924013903648657,"score_gpt":0.3319581100529624,"score_spread":0.2427179710164758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381380802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000093484035,0.00046172584,0.000008460423,0.0019251,0.00058922917,0.0002154447,0.000040673523,0.00018720719,0.9964787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03982756,0.0013652274,0.00010893896,0.00033036116,0.0005406066,0.000006446044,0.000014633678,0.00004839586,0.95775783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979206,0.000036273595,0.0004183891,0.00039624286,0.0008500262,0.00037851266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985376,0.0004982537,0.00022454289,0.0003458459,0.00022441194,0.00016934506],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004809257,0.00027285508,0.00048072846,0.000094289004,0.00033785982,0.00008408204,0.0005541793,0.000377388,0.0033556987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011354358,0.0002504943,0.00027223091,0.000050067603,0.0011524846,0.00018985794,0.000148218,0.00027305548,0.0010100862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014834695,0.000009706357,0.000009792151,0.00010980982,0.00003071625,0.000025990515,0.002745227,7.731289e-7,0.0000057337024,0.970638,0.02454445,0.0018649824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060559076,0.00007961362,0.00003408296,0.0003857246,0.00016792573,0.0000014608069,0.003578735,5.5145205e-7,0.000048661455,0.050429095,0.9448789,0.00033471777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018702395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02789734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9203344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007088222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023656937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381416100","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4473871","title":"State Action in Action: The Charter’s Application in Criminal Investigations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Charter; Political science; State (computer science); Law; State action; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.07501291459564785,"score_gpt":0.374794153197,"score_spread":0.29978123860135214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381416100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698253,0.00018171086,0.00089443434,0.027865386,0.00020624674,0.00018913754,5.761146e-7,0.00004211666,0.0007950791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929089,0.005293077,0.0000069384228,0.00009567829,0.00026641932,0.000034397424,0.0000023855728,0.0000061143137,0.0013861178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814165,0.00021749955,0.00020252829,0.0001277667,0.00028466652,0.0010258866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996284,0.000098174,0.00009104994,0.000088448425,0.000042480675,0.00005139959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031234012,0.000064478365,0.0000718371,0.0001588317,0.00051807286,0.00007697521,0.00021498503,0.000043968746,0.0000133992335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120583725,0.00005422867,0.000035689965,0.00080291793,0.00010912158,0.0004187034,0.000014190577,0.0009892976,0.000102251615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089810135,0.00008951195,0.020790694,0.000020487456,0.000023290244,0.000009154876,0.037314467,0.001096746,0.0017730023,0.6518957,0.0008833619,0.28601375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039490755,0.000109553956,0.07048182,0.000053585132,0.000024602321,0.000061093626,0.117530994,0.0009411538,0.00012209325,0.75710326,0.052958284,0.00021863772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056406413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3167103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31106964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010550084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014191592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85270005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381798365","doi":"10.4324/9781003176619-37","title":"Indigenous sentencing courts and Gladue reports","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.05688875300863551,"score_gpt":0.30920546919309816,"score_spread":0.25231671618446266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381798365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010448195,0.00057361176,0.000009750451,0.0009490748,0.00069097284,0.00023552844,0.0000034031068,0.00020534307,0.9962875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013883304,0.002318992,0.0000619567,0.00017546331,0.00043082575,0.0000032198957,0.0000058514497,0.000029234057,0.9830912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865794,0.000013295112,0.000243721,0.00034290462,0.00047030245,0.00027181001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928886,0.0001304796,0.00015073466,0.00018610028,0.00008996565,0.00015386306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006257005,0.00015219797,0.00022554601,0.00007066717,0.0005146416,0.00010451859,0.00009644604,0.00024735628,0.00043114118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010045409,0.00014429503,0.00006762874,0.000017271952,0.00021914917,0.00009782436,0.00008379024,0.00018477709,0.00016758777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010704056,0.00001108341,0.00058538705,0.0002146539,0.00008980716,0.005971912,0.029992785,0.0000016647223,0.000009475145,0.88105214,0.045848254,0.036212124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019190633,0.000023054943,0.000088846755,0.00021656833,0.000053261043,0.000067182846,0.0012886653,7.885482e-7,0.0000025256395,0.0960893,0.90188307,0.00026757573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016407015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02444037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85603476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000816199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026387267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99336106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382394176","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i2.15667","title":"The Conflation of the Justification Framework for Infringement of Aboriginal Rights with the Oakes Test in Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Conflation; Indigenous; Test (biology); Supreme court; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04871593263422157,"score_gpt":0.3712439027538741,"score_spread":0.3225279701196525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382394176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888744,0.00064465904,0.000085040854,0.009735407,0.000243706,0.0002752111,0.0000035490557,0.0000030120052,0.00013504674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988458,0.00055451127,0.000052119598,0.000016463235,0.000117571624,0.000014734807,1.7927019e-7,0.0000027442936,0.00039587414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896336,0.00010247146,0.0003422219,0.000062701816,0.0004097373,0.00011952067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978312,0.001245388,0.0004488984,0.00006823792,0.00039368647,0.000012591796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015676679,0.000041497744,0.00013704278,0.000026235026,0.00044257886,0.00011733751,0.00023354667,0.00002533448,0.0000015861119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051487476,0.000026132826,0.00004150925,0.0003377765,0.0003586498,0.00018847166,0.000017041762,0.00011879062,3.3585297e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016000558,0.0001140843,0.91545445,0.00013580991,0.00010152602,0.000008379877,0.04733652,0.0009931397,0.00017538268,0.026812572,0.0026386392,0.006069509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028405734,0.00016340554,0.92709744,0.0008953415,0.000051657673,0.0000031220154,0.018995795,0.000024117246,0.000087658984,0.0060771983,0.046263147,0.000057034835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008449323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5059068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49745753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070225266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000920171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382653418","doi":"10.29173/wclawr83","title":"Barred: Why the Innocent Can't Get out of Prison","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Misconduct; Prison; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08177313844520986,"score_gpt":0.366859515541614,"score_spread":0.28508637709640416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382653418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015170572,0.10952341,0.00014554245,0.7211669,0.004525447,0.0037774625,0.000044655335,0.00054557296,0.14510041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8536538,0.13235353,0.000010098677,0.010225989,0.00041862423,0.00010182066,0.000010503399,0.000017507684,0.0032081546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826825,0.0005281144,0.00033156003,0.00016068364,0.00045738218,0.0002539852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892694,0.0002683481,0.00018022332,0.0003946667,0.00017046234,0.000059367685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026122828,0.000101184225,0.00022779041,0.000015525691,0.0007172605,0.000041525313,0.0004918332,0.00004296875,0.00046648306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028133238,0.000056809047,0.000111882335,0.00055106584,0.0005260711,0.00012085929,0.000078710866,0.00015081099,0.0004241058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013258575,0.000028755661,0.0002623373,0.001049169,0.000046579346,0.0000027454257,0.009050126,0.000012548529,0.00006360501,0.7585289,0.20570318,0.025238784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039863044,0.000018954153,0.00029934495,0.00072589424,0.00008278167,0.000001068421,0.00085626583,0.000009407876,0.000035967256,0.00085772236,0.99699974,0.00007296052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006313109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082784165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8384832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000600906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010026386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382683095","doi":"10.1515/9780773560260-008","title":"Les interdictions du district judiciaire de Montréal","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.041272583940564544,"score_gpt":0.25790880788237075,"score_spread":0.2166362239418062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382683095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026510935,0.000025584355,0.0013236931,0.0021340125,0.0006977767,0.00040631634,0.00048539357,0.00024644038,0.9944157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28448942,0.0015191381,0.00029159305,0.00016892146,0.00047798248,0.0000014771896,0.000023882489,0.000053483258,0.7129741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707276,0.00025586117,0.00039898325,0.00074703805,0.0006740636,0.0008512888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978406,0.00041382576,0.00037893865,0.00047526823,0.00031308248,0.0005782833],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044786188,0.00058134703,0.0005802032,0.00025417467,0.003532196,0.000072351904,0.00091161666,0.00085440715,0.00026076124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006041703,0.0007110197,0.0005763098,0.00005784379,0.0017819077,0.00030474275,0.0006111654,0.00093770085,0.000071922615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014744714,0.000051947158,0.00012683147,0.00007220292,0.00018794756,0.0008810479,0.0011424219,0.000035803274,0.0000030088138,0.9662652,0.0029034647,0.028182667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033201033,0.00013202037,0.0004443247,0.00049574365,0.0007297515,0.000015572143,0.0017677558,0.000036014648,0.000041518037,0.00088476395,0.9944417,0.000678855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2998784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010786452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019814621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012077737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382865325","doi":"10.1515/9780773556188-005","title":"Part-time Montreal Law Practice and Part-time Law School Lecturing of the 1950s and 1960s","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016605561410025366,"score_gpt":0.2264723565137187,"score_spread":0.20986679510369333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382865325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012030202,0.000026530852,0.0000010245319,0.0008683421,0.00015422764,0.0005943293,0.00019344725,0.00007210557,0.9979697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017677063,0.0004377345,0.000059892478,0.00033720417,0.00015979758,9.282395e-7,0.000005755103,0.000036000205,0.98128563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795496,0.00026337348,0.00024320523,0.0005736713,0.0005723002,0.00039247374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802285,0.0005798839,0.0004264722,0.0004997937,0.00020936105,0.00026163043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003817473,0.0003440815,0.0004924916,0.000056188896,0.0012650024,0.00010144712,0.00051269063,0.00041292526,0.00010236072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000829975,0.00032181913,0.00016056256,0.000016162401,0.0012559273,0.00045127366,0.00063771533,0.0005129228,0.000030660158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019102338,0.0000135898845,0.0000034521033,0.00008804467,0.00012562824,0.000043174234,0.00074531906,0.0000046160126,0.000014349728,0.9966643,0.0015589906,0.00054752594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033019978,0.00007970372,0.000010811702,0.0004041221,0.00047988284,0.0000043459604,0.0002539232,0.000003943677,0.00012467754,0.0012445045,0.9967037,0.0003602031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048007827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032069144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015308724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012300005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384152451","doi":"10.1515/9780773556102-014","title":"L'avènement de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés : le pouvoir remis aux citoyens, un tournant plus fondamental que prévu","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02301969338907565,"score_gpt":0.24825418473251556,"score_spread":0.22523449134343992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384152451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010680594,0.000034942914,0.00011449829,0.0033044505,0.0007233182,0.0009859449,0.0006909477,0.00014997864,0.98331535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28919378,0.0012108351,0.00038580244,0.00041149405,0.00016623766,0.0000034334118,0.000030247385,0.00007781099,0.70852035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546415,0.0008336204,0.00048655798,0.001073314,0.00071890047,0.0014234462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969832,0.0005606837,0.0005292913,0.0006469006,0.00030813823,0.0009718074],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011358522,0.00080097734,0.00084821694,0.00022499505,0.0025117307,0.00016699875,0.0012111424,0.0008340094,0.00031055306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073371884,0.0009528296,0.0004990175,0.000055181627,0.0016831907,0.0005092623,0.00081172615,0.0010364898,0.000047877023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002104902,0.00007232569,0.000039595132,0.00023169792,0.00031365443,0.0010162285,0.0066767535,0.000063909334,0.00016324801,0.9849647,0.0014310984,0.0048162723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011206662,0.00023907973,0.00014227563,0.0012243706,0.0005026678,0.000036599162,0.0025803212,0.00004611463,0.0007647621,0.0037350126,0.98855317,0.0010549437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38425398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00535553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98712206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003793709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015762487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384168566","doi":"10.1515/9780773568075-009","title":"The Exchequer Court of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exchequer; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02061050302600599,"score_gpt":0.22540030184178483,"score_spread":0.20478979881577886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384168566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009351669,0.0000074479485,0.0000019335732,0.0012608898,0.00023547457,0.00026843703,0.00021201215,0.00004231907,0.9979621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008405581,0.0007424459,0.00001606112,0.00009436335,0.000097629054,5.188978e-7,0.0000044673584,0.000021426722,0.9906175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981984,0.00010223632,0.00020872896,0.00031928468,0.0007581944,0.00041317302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860674,0.00031352902,0.00023595708,0.00042315345,0.00021390282,0.00020669062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026362712,0.00024274451,0.00031315107,0.000048155405,0.0016190306,0.000031114338,0.0008408716,0.00027478865,0.00018857849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025550886,0.00022728996,0.00016240009,0.0000116433675,0.0007129732,0.000082721206,0.00016900629,0.00035954974,0.0000048903303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000694871,0.000003401698,8.6335064e-7,0.000021176325,0.000061263054,0.00009650593,0.00031394997,0.0000048623647,6.4248235e-7,0.96593976,0.03178291,0.0017051989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010823673,0.000019911355,0.000004950532,0.000118784264,0.000115630784,5.464734e-7,0.00042937053,7.454684e-7,0.000041991538,0.0018203864,0.99708414,0.0002552905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8279456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08987678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052522053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007995267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384705183","doi":"10.7202/1099313ar","title":"Les acteur.trices de la justice : les légistes","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06302302038413941,"score_gpt":0.40531307011260154,"score_spread":0.3422900497284621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384705183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44004694,0.06488173,0.00020262726,0.076173946,0.0021557577,0.00030932706,0.000020053505,0.00065809983,0.4155515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965353,0.015722046,0.00015765925,0.00021054466,0.0019013687,0.000019711662,0.0000053322324,0.00002700482,0.085421026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695486,0.0007553807,0.00024769775,0.00038872598,0.0004118521,0.001241463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972048,0.0021825987,0.00011913106,0.00023051626,0.00007230823,0.00019065675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015312476,0.0002116042,0.0002329865,0.000080547594,0.0011289028,0.00022636366,0.0006157389,0.00032248299,0.000902472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007587378,0.00022323802,0.00015505112,0.0011091933,0.0009445656,0.00030846777,0.00010322409,0.00057854946,0.000863579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818306,0.00010168297,0.0017390433,0.0002943922,0.00005358707,0.000051812043,0.0050768293,0.000083694526,0.0018616144,0.79137766,0.07397034,0.12535119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011216324,0.00014884486,0.005088635,0.00011109973,0.00027942724,0.000011964914,0.0026154856,0.00025539528,0.00038868756,0.014200211,0.9765113,0.00027680246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020902205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007037386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042927786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060163107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385207589","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3812","title":"The Principle of Proportionality in Sentencing: A Dynamic Evolution and Multiplication of Conceptions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Desert (philosophy); Epistemology; Punishment (psychology); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Conceptual framework; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028988565804703607,"score_gpt":0.3441027141883296,"score_spread":0.315114148383626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385207589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98542124,0.000623907,0.00086621975,0.0036284844,0.00013298726,0.0002460082,0.000012425333,0.000007583089,0.00906112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956536,0.0001038234,0.00020736876,0.000009898078,0.000019582729,0.000012351667,0.0000012675063,0.0000021467458,0.000078190096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891365,0.00025273423,0.00027857602,0.00007620641,0.00036378167,0.00011502887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993874,0.00010817698,0.0002613843,0.00007556517,0.00012785215,0.000039645325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016299847,0.00003483553,0.000075555705,0.000023774272,0.0011282217,0.000016723954,0.00013630281,0.000017949229,0.000038306945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014064518,0.000028768847,0.00003620277,0.00012887028,0.00035564014,0.00013032516,0.000051519928,0.00016007487,3.402864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031068474,0.00006614943,0.018422235,0.000008481168,0.000004969936,9.79204e-7,0.0016814767,0.00031544914,0.0016905845,0.97690535,0.000009098341,0.0008641619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001158906,0.00032466764,0.49861348,0.00014880802,0.00006880407,0.0001593062,0.062136654,0.00588127,0.0002447028,0.4063372,0.024648588,0.00027758523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032153323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18958025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57056814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021056266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001507645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9742916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385207603","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3814","title":"Animal Rights Activism and the Constitution: Are Ag-Gag Laws Justifiable Limits?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Government of Canada","funders":"Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University","keywords":"Legislation; Private property; Public property; Business; Constitution; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law; Permission; Agriculture; Numerus clausus; Law and economics; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.038774735410318485,"score_gpt":0.29621756662216997,"score_spread":0.25744283121185146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385207603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02026169,0.0018763611,0.00009356774,0.027859824,0.0010651217,0.00023324377,0.000013661621,0.000052737865,0.9485438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670595,0.000194555,0.00013938967,0.0006335365,0.00064203935,0.000015813088,8.7791335e-7,0.000006066869,0.0016617948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997898,0.00059929554,0.00023284572,0.0002037843,0.00067477854,0.0003912972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901825,0.0003128961,0.00022230971,0.00014542392,0.00009840135,0.0002027252],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019681288,0.00012368638,0.0002145069,0.000030314026,0.010214381,0.00043345164,0.00040656768,0.000052256593,0.0009800305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009745396,0.00008810796,0.00010309918,0.00015083062,0.0013285915,0.0005095076,0.00011961664,0.00067645154,0.000023996135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001849526,0.000041183233,0.00011281282,0.0000054697784,0.00002131251,0.00010949469,0.0019770022,0.000054886226,0.00004724614,0.9925045,0.0046382854,0.0003028849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052989,0.000107341984,0.0002423061,0.000052835236,0.00011457796,0.0007588285,0.009303833,0.00006682568,0.00008563426,0.14787562,0.8401124,0.00022683127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044920407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09082007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97644424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014081059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016958882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385310803","doi":"10.59962/9780774867689","title":"Constitutionalizing Criminal Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04041631574321696,"score_gpt":0.2430482774225144,"score_spread":0.20263196167929742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385310803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001927257,0.0005019364,0.00001856568,0.00002599024,0.00032767392,0.00029635234,0.0005976755,0.00008387283,0.9979552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055300854,0.00023908667,0.00016950263,0.00008427726,0.0001323477,8.200904e-7,0.000046448964,0.0000129442815,0.9937845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826694,0.00015948812,0.00016725907,0.00036950933,0.00074651133,0.00029028536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999061,0.00015084562,0.0002210875,0.0002024573,0.00021391155,0.00015068341],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034391182,0.000092284965,0.00032402444,0.000026431482,0.0016118365,0.00018498274,0.00070645707,0.00021980319,0.0034671493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027037724,0.00026569632,0.00021219884,0.000013875212,0.0026485298,0.00014432335,0.0003536333,0.00037115547,0.0000075336957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019260026,0.000028326585,0.000008627299,0.0001805643,0.000060690152,0.00072305574,0.0025639108,0.0000026241396,0.0000012531536,0.39312962,0.59807986,0.0052021923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019596136,0.000034678353,0.000020018017,0.00036051797,0.0002303313,0.000027343223,0.0019760742,7.476336e-7,2.620298e-7,0.0035863167,0.99330616,0.00026161564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85751504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85811365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39522627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042464785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013031597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312886","doi":"10.59962/9780774867771-009","title":"The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03343787351661778,"score_gpt":0.2336122260564085,"score_spread":0.2001743525397907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038556857,0.00027740767,0.0000031560687,0.000042454492,0.00051512866,0.0006830257,0.0007324764,0.00024315485,0.9936475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012356521,0.0005683129,0.00002400305,0.000015987192,0.0002562646,0.0000014876739,0.000034001318,0.00003983878,0.9867036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973507,0.00013964054,0.0003458088,0.0006025865,0.0009920283,0.00056922063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981235,0.0003205049,0.0003916721,0.00041940226,0.00047780605,0.00026711304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006567056,0.00013712417,0.0005089875,0.000019252288,0.009102179,0.0036576123,0.0013626878,0.00052938645,0.0008636226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004065649,0.00037559128,0.00040005406,0.000023557508,0.0026636284,0.0001608797,0.00041265777,0.00053163525,0.00003636798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013042321,0.000023024782,0.000060814695,0.00007947341,0.0001645824,0.0013752189,0.00059664866,2.8688325e-7,0.000001431114,0.019788232,0.9498624,0.028034816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035139118,0.00006530171,0.0007949667,0.0010102506,0.00020020801,0.00002557736,0.00032901316,9.904127e-7,1.7260462e-7,0.029711202,0.96710163,0.00040928158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99953073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027625533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019032127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002478951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312904","doi":"10.59962/9780774867771-011","title":"Menzies v. Vancouver Police Department","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Police department; Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.037218595455080536,"score_gpt":0.23550276878388393,"score_spread":0.19828417332880338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005149851,0.00011406119,0.0000065448075,0.000021888702,0.00045727665,0.00037002205,0.00045301978,0.00014409143,0.9979181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050721522,0.0008446587,0.00009334008,0.000029548448,0.00013977455,6.105234e-7,0.000012843736,0.000027893877,0.9937792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985607,0.000045663943,0.0001579121,0.0003619954,0.0005763492,0.0002973788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908644,0.0000990104,0.00019538571,0.00024020147,0.00021395722,0.00016501984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020937862,0.00010925836,0.00032348477,0.00003594555,0.0005346615,0.00012867646,0.00052336836,0.0002916509,0.00041686374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014465738,0.00027812153,0.00019823386,0.000009960205,0.0007998364,0.00008301248,0.0002737954,0.00018357969,0.000031769057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021713491,0.000015673708,0.000022808366,0.00011214433,0.0001319627,0.0002416355,0.0036398694,0.0000015208882,0.0000011792337,0.020786235,0.9568403,0.01818496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001751959,0.000041930893,0.000108985776,0.00046346546,0.0001528212,0.000002403748,0.0013252941,6.868153e-7,6.682885e-7,0.0028148766,0.9946418,0.00027187917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86342955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1266027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014037492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023476956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385321903","doi":"10.59962/9780774863346-006","title":"Canadian Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02967689959797474,"score_gpt":0.20728535141166682,"score_spread":0.1776084518136921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385321903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005136416,0.00018525586,0.0000025122727,0.00020613987,0.00014584202,0.00024639405,0.0005253376,0.0000558176,0.99858135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0358018,0.00020634124,0.000079011596,0.0001881126,0.00011117682,1.2069891e-7,0.000012919943,0.00001686369,0.96358365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989255,0.00003430186,0.00011487703,0.00031392375,0.0003532494,0.00025811428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990239,0.000041959745,0.00011576813,0.00016989757,0.00017568454,0.00047279528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000111267334,0.000082874074,0.00028207942,0.000020674532,0.00062633614,0.00017542133,0.00057247316,0.0003170636,0.0011944039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013123394,0.00023746052,0.00015698867,0.0000059479703,0.0008382587,0.000088431414,0.00011135407,0.00025098838,0.00003316269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009762226,0.0000048486204,0.000013446725,0.000090379355,0.00007215666,0.0013597031,0.0022518807,3.118429e-7,9.200213e-7,0.64499694,0.33285642,0.018343221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101426325,0.000025104728,0.000020324804,0.00030752516,0.00009479701,0.0000048801476,0.00035652478,7.458432e-7,2.2649962e-7,0.005586308,0.9932726,0.00022953395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6604162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025375487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007060792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385361822","doi":"10.59962/9780774867184-018","title":"Liquor-Related Laws in Force in Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028280722712198957,"score_gpt":0.2104570404586067,"score_spread":0.18217631774640775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385361822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018059142,0.00017880027,5.0724685e-7,0.000045007626,0.00015926134,0.00044001886,0.00007104162,0.00003628586,0.98100996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049843885,0.00023097827,0.000034433047,0.000026551736,0.000012393072,7.8961517e-7,0.000015491305,0.000015250221,0.9498202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851114,0.000091094946,0.00024739112,0.00039592956,0.00045760852,0.00029683352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993483,0.00009354399,0.00019291147,0.00019641359,0.00007182502,0.00009702409],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003830189,0.0001009194,0.00039201367,0.000077677476,0.0002778419,0.000077473334,0.0005937148,0.0003331655,0.0047365027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001690162,0.0002799592,0.00014685538,0.000017780889,0.00050342584,0.00015662354,0.00031024753,0.00072567223,0.0000049832815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006294954,0.00050307286,0.010959037,0.0006640708,0.00041270364,0.022316566,0.15755364,0.00024892465,0.000014325445,0.48572338,0.22621359,0.09476121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046259997,0.000054773005,0.0019240992,0.0004937131,0.00004177482,0.0000074592667,0.0007396275,0.0000022957959,1.0801025e-7,0.004818879,0.9911692,0.00028542837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76495564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086329435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005935588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385362300","doi":"10.59962/9780774838207-004","title":"Canada’s Opposition to a Covenant on Human Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Opposition (politics); Human rights; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.033824714405430945,"score_gpt":0.23418697109863862,"score_spread":0.20036225669320767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385362300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029453598,0.00002449562,0.0000039198203,0.00011527014,0.00021703988,0.0005349347,0.0006077211,0.00003130132,0.99551994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.119595945,0.000013089961,0.000023410168,0.00011060893,0.000072813105,2.1870724e-7,0.000017685908,0.000012112849,0.88015413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998559,0.0000454904,0.00014066385,0.0003712263,0.0006312005,0.0002524185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991131,0.000060179726,0.00015925808,0.00024493586,0.00020510441,0.00021744719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013028093,0.00010291517,0.00031538936,0.000031798816,0.0007771093,0.00011843507,0.0004832052,0.00022027816,0.000475212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006216431,0.00023414414,0.00011221007,0.000005742615,0.00024682903,0.000060957624,0.00012025431,0.00019639723,0.000017838423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045049743,0.000023664692,0.0000068372356,0.00010083081,0.00007105339,0.00070850155,0.0009789666,0.0000047194144,0.000015281865,0.17968462,0.81283903,0.0055214525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017423615,0.00011639207,0.00016837835,0.0011153128,0.000076688055,0.0000037480868,0.00009382684,4.0402455e-7,0.000003613358,0.0014721636,0.9964993,0.0002759275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18366028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047277057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093405996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9548121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385433775","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-38157-7_5","title":"The Political, Legal, and Criminal Justice Systems of the UK, the U.S., Canada, and Australia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Critical criminological perspectives","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.15567581556491683,"score_gpt":0.36885526715773853,"score_spread":0.2131794515928217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385433775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062032197,0.027675265,0.000028318571,0.25826135,0.005168728,0.0022516637,0.00043784053,0.00023044781,0.6439142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91735685,0.0010378405,0.0000090953445,0.00034114622,0.0005706521,0.0000196129,7.0462e-7,0.0000205654,0.08064353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969399,0.00031961952,0.0004336586,0.0005724523,0.00090806565,0.00082630187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223804,0.0064394497,0.000107128675,0.00045066804,0.00044209612,0.00032259364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006351861,0.00034112888,0.00044642802,0.000029977662,0.0024698346,0.00038487735,0.0008068155,0.00038245658,0.00009465817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006277024,0.00016610304,0.00014725627,0.000060708146,0.014782088,0.00008457,0.00040674154,0.0009998839,0.000010205065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025963844,0.00001107798,0.00003762997,0.00017002695,0.00003099505,0.000037486916,0.0015502337,3.176054e-7,0.000005779358,0.99305737,0.0049737873,0.00009932192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020054344,0.00039739496,0.012728383,0.000701851,0.0033771896,0.00014915154,0.512745,0.000013746171,0.000016384516,0.2928346,0.17588204,0.00095370313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42053378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38128048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025137246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055401254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385470913","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-4163-3.ch004","title":"Negligence, Risk Management, and Liability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Appeal; Risk management; Supreme court; Law; Business; Liability insurance; Political science; Actuarial science; Finance","score_opus":0.05963058880957621,"score_gpt":0.32663870198497247,"score_spread":0.26700811317539624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385470913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024469759,0.033812914,0.0000105824265,0.010354473,0.00073700503,0.0005495528,0.000044531298,0.00008085006,0.9541654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012608909,0.16521895,0.0006596494,0.00021707788,0.0005773451,0.000069125716,0.000052837702,0.000029385526,0.8205667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979582,0.0002050234,0.000449374,0.0006240404,0.0004225825,0.00034081953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977817,0.0014104783,0.00031629097,0.00020693966,0.00012522095,0.0001593651],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001581281,0.0002853618,0.0002638585,0.00014938187,0.0007382563,0.000173708,0.00019878727,0.0002095599,0.0005255967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008588731,0.00032327225,0.00005387846,0.00008785626,0.0015336021,0.0013324511,0.00004348777,0.00031765853,0.000026685406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017986112,0.00002723057,0.011272478,0.00069315475,0.000021972182,0.000006639124,0.003745564,0.0000016462094,9.5593265e-8,0.9737283,0.0029589285,0.0073641185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006300258,0.000048631653,0.012002902,0.00048730284,0.00004648351,0.0000046810037,0.01001822,6.676994e-7,6.300385e-7,0.1524712,0.8245438,0.0003125278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086031934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010450717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089877205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045038297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510037","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1426","title":"Touch of Evil: Disagreements at the Heart of the Criminal Law Power","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Parliament; Political science; Criminal law; Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Politics","score_opus":0.059901766982270975,"score_gpt":0.3523978768534113,"score_spread":0.29249610987114033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12895332,0.3066823,0.00000890542,0.15076117,0.0025259233,0.0042716977,0.00021594032,0.000066807996,0.40651393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878614,0.0049533946,0.000015826954,0.0049525406,0.000043625652,0.00005033968,0.0000025879922,0.000009029291,0.002111289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719536,0.0008408546,0.00040455433,0.0001934427,0.001098423,0.00026738716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988245,0.00020983416,0.00020757907,0.0005692932,0.00012988399,0.000058919202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021700796,0.00010889748,0.000316094,0.0000066372236,0.0010791555,0.000014582691,0.00086016953,0.000022844439,0.005593265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015239183,0.00006490238,0.00028551128,0.0002665149,0.0008623305,0.000108061366,0.0005104437,0.00015955877,0.00003211195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026696382,0.00015784705,0.0016952327,0.0014849278,0.000042874773,0.0000022240597,0.0035491495,0.000005273365,0.00039754494,0.8973578,0.094230525,0.0010498563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005494857,0.00005676136,0.0004285996,0.0007333882,0.00015663198,0.0000040769096,0.000791447,3.8739404e-7,0.00018442786,0.0006412261,0.9968668,0.00008129678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007672169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008178816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9026363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011285805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011308458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510428","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3718","title":"Frontline Justice: The Evolution and Reform of Summary Trials in the Canadian Armed Forces by Pascal Lévesque","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Economic Justice; Military justice; Discipline; Political science; Criminal justice; Law; Swift; Subject (documents); Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.053165095743292944,"score_gpt":0.34319482815194313,"score_spread":0.2900297324086502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0990636,0.014914765,0.0002983789,0.13758333,0.0011376019,0.0005018252,0.000079874524,0.000014203888,0.74640644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766743,0.0008879274,0.00010007221,0.00056429574,0.0004142228,0.000004536648,0.0000041781936,0.000004660623,0.00035269937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974789,0.0012087696,0.00043755653,0.00011686094,0.00044280684,0.00031507527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987026,0.00067249895,0.00020027225,0.00012683934,0.00013479343,0.00016300469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073454096,0.000082660794,0.00024307804,0.00003157675,0.0014125203,0.00022066833,0.000310814,0.00009911593,0.00008767608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086100184,0.00004673861,0.0000916918,0.000160575,0.00032677088,0.00026456267,0.000023712131,0.0003509262,0.0000018731922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057681067,0.000039225037,0.00066615304,0.000024461388,0.000024776937,0.000056308527,0.008132713,0.0000116199,0.00028479597,0.98183846,0.006985972,0.0018778355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002211921,0.0002908676,0.014546621,0.0007224502,0.0008485337,0.00050886214,0.3328255,0.00027050546,0.0006591862,0.30538523,0.34112403,0.0006062698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9315516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8986038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052257656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066270825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1426","title":"Negotiating Trauma &amp; Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legal education; Mental health; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Law; Reflexivity; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychotherapist; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.07473822658891317,"score_gpt":0.40410784692831275,"score_spread":0.3293696203393996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47239995,0.0006047269,0.00009979238,0.047733504,0.00045815427,0.000042135434,0.0000041686644,0.000018527231,0.47863907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903648,0.000079816506,0.00045352103,0.0030831306,0.004986861,2.9248318e-7,4.993383e-7,0.000006709171,0.0010243848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875927,0.00029807282,0.00027269154,0.0000801656,0.00034042305,0.0002494006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993382,0.000139312,0.00018860293,0.000043421922,0.00016116715,0.00012930913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092370796,0.00007095925,0.00020432047,0.000029667626,0.0015659576,0.0002703139,0.0001201026,0.000087052074,0.000031902364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026679123,0.000067214714,0.000120807614,0.00007698772,0.00029620255,0.00040948906,0.000032953154,0.00031591652,0.000004172359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071726954,0.000026568265,0.0000403085,0.000010427295,0.000014566289,0.000017918277,0.046634663,0.0000014755002,0.00019136976,0.94741523,0.0009659145,0.00467439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022911403,0.000028530461,0.00034380495,0.00004240754,0.000037927624,0.000046288103,0.014595721,0.0000012278175,0.000042278574,0.02796465,0.9565551,0.00011290304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026875507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008424905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95558923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008032876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026853927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511500","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1421","title":"The Impact of Vavilov: Reasonableness and Vulnerability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Supreme court; Law; Trilogy; Judicial review; Political science; Immigration; Standard of review; Vulnerability (computing); Administrative law; History","score_opus":0.05779535309543207,"score_gpt":0.39809654890772705,"score_spread":0.340301195812295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511500","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062600784,0.83043593,0.00002701836,0.029064883,0.00027222247,0.0007285001,0.000025082934,0.00006348699,0.07678207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7900981,0.20918092,0.000043471257,0.00020579877,0.000060122642,0.000011096303,0.0000020350908,0.000004670202,0.00039383306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985209,0.00053342903,0.00024309561,0.00018736474,0.00028906064,0.00022615593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986585,0.0004685094,0.00008244873,0.00034754025,0.0003378172,0.00010518751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023617987,0.00008534895,0.00027131135,0.000003364132,0.0005137117,0.00005621486,0.00020489239,0.000037223766,0.00028590753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010323267,0.00005352886,0.00015286148,0.0001948053,0.0005221285,0.00015540166,0.00006768648,0.00009305173,0.000010450898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025034087,0.000116221185,0.007401207,0.002947702,0.00007311159,0.000017609082,0.00083684555,0.0000022598465,0.00023473913,0.9112032,0.027591236,0.04955085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000621508,0.00003237277,0.0035614937,0.0019563655,0.00008081136,0.000008243021,0.00017763383,0.0000044983453,0.000082921055,0.006632946,0.98727953,0.00012101267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008719406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052525657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055545126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033646566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511511","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1417","title":"Policing Arbitrariness: Fleming v. Ontario and the Ancillary Powers Doctrine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arbitrariness; Law; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Power (physics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.03635044261269767,"score_gpt":0.3190331780598511,"score_spread":0.28268273544715344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154195335,0.39625776,0.000027421464,0.12377214,0.00057434395,0.0007808203,0.000003541542,0.00009304394,0.4630714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43238306,0.527814,0.0004505077,0.03180958,0.0005741542,0.000043177988,0.0000112279695,0.000023662953,0.0068906792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846166,0.0002680518,0.0002891437,0.00025352792,0.00039001735,0.0003375937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990251,0.00027142203,0.00008172314,0.0002965119,0.00020025525,0.00012499883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017676678,0.000130409,0.00037197035,0.000010304356,0.0006376295,0.00011683149,0.00023260704,0.000045734683,0.00081523514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045389764,0.00009294881,0.0001137571,0.00026180418,0.00045160778,0.00024085962,0.00012004139,0.00021964111,0.000027552833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018290897,0.00002090706,0.0014328522,0.00092827476,0.000039479342,0.00007137829,0.004827031,5.6710866e-7,0.000036361493,0.97453785,0.0074121626,0.010674862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019166038,0.000006188616,0.00033054018,0.0018064455,0.00012122358,0.000031710475,0.00030029425,9.732759e-7,0.000022439359,0.0021613436,0.9948952,0.00013196765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19971055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5207121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013127216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004965161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89262533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511540","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1415","title":"Sidestepping the Charter, Again: Muting the Right to Habeas Corpus in Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Principle of legality; Political science; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Immigration; Preparedness; State of emergency; Refugee; Politics","score_opus":0.03941747296194391,"score_gpt":0.302507838068831,"score_spread":0.2630903651068871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05312113,0.436161,0.00004903551,0.44081587,0.002075672,0.0024142864,0.000033168642,0.00007014804,0.0652597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016839,0.09054385,0.000023638651,0.006718717,0.00020061998,0.00006014253,0.000005931313,0.000014017455,0.00074916915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973471,0.00070181367,0.0005148077,0.00036792702,0.0005452449,0.0005230967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869126,0.00032479284,0.0001323357,0.00047510568,0.00019013477,0.00018634116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002304386,0.00016571478,0.00035065223,0.000011413305,0.0011910717,0.00010339588,0.0005338723,0.00003535667,0.0005509596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092243036,0.00010590114,0.00007794616,0.0005866162,0.00014188614,0.00024080154,0.00019169615,0.00020806486,0.000017103028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033301643,0.00010957908,0.017965851,0.0041144458,0.00012700834,0.00039807428,0.028843597,0.000023550521,0.00013490755,0.7942528,0.07336844,0.08062841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052485804,0.000006901037,0.0013235235,0.0017950775,0.000040712475,0.00001361166,0.0015566715,0.000017043487,0.000007371584,0.0004198075,0.9945992,0.0001675783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73635525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99276274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9212308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038127607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015232941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9160881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512088","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1388","title":"Ewert v. Canada: Shining Light on Corrections and Indigenous People","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Supreme court; Alienation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Service (business); Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.04312486217968218,"score_gpt":0.30159071501481893,"score_spread":0.25846585283513673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03602719,0.20648308,0.00006897374,0.48568118,0.0022693386,0.0022729016,0.000049438357,0.00034435134,0.26680356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410625,0.038479716,0.00003505786,0.019669121,0.00029326847,0.000023175,0.000004622189,0.0000124554535,0.00042009552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880946,0.0001258113,0.00019323126,0.00023192295,0.00037305133,0.00026651914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933964,0.00012930315,0.0000616594,0.00012575806,0.000077864344,0.0002657603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036726816,0.00010634311,0.0002678861,0.0000074101135,0.00074069435,0.00005436493,0.00019290819,0.00003691438,0.00032906176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000372534,0.00009684289,0.000047463738,0.00022793817,0.000062064115,0.00012910677,0.00003797134,0.00015654556,0.000053600397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041493913,0.00011084576,0.009500499,0.0045747804,0.000095627074,0.00012985193,0.055213004,0.000006827472,0.000066783025,0.35962942,0.52664465,0.043986227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000334356,0.00004472122,0.0003665902,0.00088971824,0.00005042559,0.0000022448412,0.000562114,0.000002868591,0.000010051907,0.000047559908,0.99786353,0.00012674493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6566545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9548192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010946545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005645811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5696897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512102","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1378","title":"R. v. Comeau: A Crack In the Wall?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Corporation; Law; Economic history; History; Business; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1230823411716574,"score_gpt":0.37116021248468095,"score_spread":0.24807787131302356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010354505,0.10645164,0.000018423423,0.7370768,0.00012322729,0.00093909475,0.0000034315294,0.00006646853,0.15428546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79472464,0.084881514,0.00008492838,0.11975615,0.00023740933,0.000049216185,0.0000035546202,0.00000982131,0.00025276042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840635,0.0004382913,0.00024750075,0.00018929731,0.00045757898,0.00026097472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937767,0.00019702075,0.00005474066,0.00020544542,0.000058912927,0.00010621081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014640889,0.00009177056,0.00024263444,0.0000060017405,0.00023327267,0.00006628133,0.00063797465,0.000037509824,0.000742743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043487028,0.00006124897,0.00010434404,0.00035854374,0.00019450627,0.0001928171,0.000041497762,0.00018133913,0.0005855273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008722958,0.00005189157,0.00071025727,0.0016686172,0.000008058095,0.00005148823,0.00913316,6.5087016e-7,0.000012227182,0.79637957,0.18520546,0.0067698914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000479844,0.000022209484,0.00015837139,0.00086851226,0.000028977913,0.0000013840438,0.0003264828,0.000004696734,0.0000012997289,0.000929652,0.99752176,0.00008866867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004062893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007729675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032188498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007997428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81325155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518186","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1182","title":"Appointment of Thomas A. Cromwell to the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science","score_opus":0.042000117219170095,"score_gpt":0.3210072597370037,"score_spread":0.27900714251783365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518186","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011841314,0.19828103,0.0001867598,0.42881304,0.0011139829,0.0044815964,0.00012477797,0.00008471796,0.35507277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97004056,0.019399358,0.00029356836,0.008209603,0.00016733853,0.000021889267,0.000004792395,0.000011129944,0.0018517758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759567,0.00026766045,0.00055179576,0.00023932371,0.00094362255,0.00040193394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985848,0.0001705157,0.00020117973,0.00052424415,0.00032290278,0.00019634457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018747502,0.00015826283,0.0004989332,0.000015240823,0.0002820535,0.000020438343,0.0007416738,0.000043897035,0.00046650725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003027995,0.000111951886,0.00015396476,0.00031871872,0.00019816954,0.000108056374,0.000056893394,0.00010989544,0.000023686129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028987375,0.00012961937,0.0001387616,0.0013817078,0.00004201231,0.000012594749,0.0016217004,0.000021877102,0.00029083504,0.43239304,0.5545965,0.009342376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585804,0.00009746981,0.00033646915,0.0019491584,0.000092685375,0.0000019415836,0.00021960495,0.0000018223398,0.0004178295,0.00081032387,0.9958801,0.00013400817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37163615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71256477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015311746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008215389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63254815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518201","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1053","title":"In Harm’s Way: The Limits to Legislating Criminal Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm principle; Law; Constitutionality; Charter; Harm; Supreme court; Legislature; Criminal law; Political science; Discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.10647320265844608,"score_gpt":0.38585393060511947,"score_spread":0.2793807279466734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008033671,0.08854521,0.00012940099,0.4471961,0.0010178611,0.0022899834,0.000008757876,0.00014573618,0.4526333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365375,0.016355636,0.0006313714,0.04506265,0.00051944517,0.000093622555,0.0000019391719,0.000020477853,0.0007773377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801904,0.0002426446,0.00038084257,0.0003026652,0.0005498642,0.00050495693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911374,0.00017432877,0.000078591234,0.0003444127,0.00012099148,0.00016792485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020796994,0.00015652913,0.00031238364,0.000018437526,0.0006361017,0.000116897885,0.00060304103,0.00005609498,0.00029780008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041354366,0.00011574063,0.00012447409,0.0003734757,0.00029962076,0.00046052694,0.000077822624,0.00023485799,0.0005323302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045035163,0.000028085678,0.000017206945,0.00037951636,0.0000039082843,0.0000232296,0.0038567386,0.000009960502,0.00004143586,0.9859431,0.006944741,0.002747587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087853085,0.000035031764,0.00005919223,0.0036710978,0.000057088553,0.0000063371467,0.0004771301,6.839538e-7,0.00006772607,0.0045737163,0.9907932,0.00017092522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032947756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08188371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98384845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017353262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001512468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599519","doi":"10.59962/9780774835558-005","title":"<i>Auton v British Columbia:</i> Reversal of Fortune","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.027280979908316946,"score_gpt":0.21889314022542827,"score_spread":0.1916121603171113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011625727,0.00041544568,0.00001896974,0.000021412734,0.000418971,0.00066910917,0.0014053928,0.00010962358,0.9853153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01923335,0.0012669265,0.00037753858,0.000043776814,0.00020978434,6.313574e-7,0.00003193822,0.000040948067,0.9787951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751574,0.000090792375,0.0004140903,0.0006234001,0.00090624846,0.00044974024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977595,0.0001305951,0.00064365903,0.00042502364,0.0007731853,0.00026803737],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046423497,0.00014239835,0.0007525471,0.00003192728,0.0006835423,0.00044713126,0.0009941465,0.0006633517,0.0040535354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006107654,0.000493068,0.00041391343,0.000021467968,0.0029760918,0.00023862669,0.00039434375,0.00034444113,0.000013019066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040346724,0.000063990075,0.0003281029,0.0004483979,0.0001934106,0.00072404044,0.0018951965,2.5776484e-7,0.000013593729,0.0015800305,0.9490992,0.04561347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005058736,0.00017720589,0.0006111714,0.002341839,0.00029423364,0.000038847586,0.0006762746,0.0000017331482,0.0000021155886,0.003976235,0.99089307,0.00048142628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96795595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99332416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04513205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016780352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005025167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599526","doi":"10.59962/9780774835558-006","title":"<i>Chaoulli v Quebec:</i> The Last Line of Defence for Citizens","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.035974779376377886,"score_gpt":0.23454588028355697,"score_spread":0.19857110090717908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023309356,0.00038361768,0.0003228844,0.00010543718,0.0002718391,0.0008710151,0.001070113,0.000050205064,0.994594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023515232,0.00044119422,0.00027462316,0.00005207195,0.00021949543,9.785325e-7,0.000011562064,0.00001951028,0.97546536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987003,0.00005089624,0.00022108952,0.00032549386,0.00043987654,0.00026233407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982612,0.0002850638,0.00038647986,0.0003066754,0.0006583637,0.00010221859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038079164,0.000108099375,0.00037737197,0.000022449056,0.0005785776,0.00010069525,0.0008422081,0.00029333797,0.0004715144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060108974,0.00020038144,0.00028282436,0.000010678064,0.0027115718,0.00008067365,0.00020830898,0.00017288943,0.00000487235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017754984,0.00006680319,0.0000496776,0.0007390837,0.00028966286,0.000104088256,0.014200145,0.000003453035,0.000045740784,0.11074804,0.7976461,0.07592965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002701992,0.00011105235,0.000047351637,0.0008673949,0.00022428499,0.000004648006,0.0011054015,0.000004444879,0.000010343811,0.0060817883,0.99104977,0.00022332843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6830072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96453047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28152332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007006772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031698772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385820679","doi":"10.23939/law2022.36.182","title":"The experience of the United States оf America and Canada in the prevention of criminal offenses against the subjects of criminal proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika» Seria Uridicni nauki","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Criminal investigation; Psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine","score_opus":0.018836428935683797,"score_gpt":0.2627632403262862,"score_spread":0.24392681139060238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385820679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912754,0.00070225506,0.000002597754,0.005945934,0.00022247579,0.0005856305,0.0001145193,0.000012538074,0.0011386409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787325,0.0010434228,0.000023968552,0.0004916721,0.00005684015,0.000022372411,0.000019349869,0.000012858293,0.00045624725],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643797,0.00071423955,0.00052909553,0.00032783413,0.0014571201,0.0005337402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722177,0.00121542,0.000694693,0.00035651855,0.0004079139,0.00010370503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059602,0.00023690805,0.0003162906,0.00018893922,0.0020316644,0.000057095454,0.0015564476,0.000059033067,0.00006253148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039160252,0.00014537155,0.00015409985,0.001626417,0.0018963019,0.00030562488,0.0004431195,0.0003767364,3.2958422e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023281293,0.00080004445,0.018432396,0.0006308762,0.000244353,0.000055377284,0.7007253,0.0007111094,0.015360684,0.23860061,0.018998267,0.003112815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049554015,0.00036225485,0.022040872,0.00016315581,0.00019186267,0.00002347071,0.7849403,0.00014314114,0.0031800317,0.00063713785,0.18755147,0.00027079665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4194046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12104518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29835942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033358723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012696413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385861524","doi":"10.59962/9780774850346-013","title":"Selections from the Dissent in <i>Symes</i> v. <i>Canada</i> <sup>†</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Political science; Nuclear physics; Physics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.025354335161872465,"score_gpt":0.21668320457346146,"score_spread":0.191328869411589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385861524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036768592,0.00062970835,0.000015106254,0.00023383253,0.00016349381,0.00043778057,0.00071123336,0.00004378066,0.99408823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053977504,0.00068240013,0.00006167998,0.00021467969,0.00019276995,5.624629e-7,0.000027217115,0.000021651016,0.94482154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982675,0.000082992636,0.00022984433,0.00039529122,0.0006735692,0.00035084502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880064,0.0003929216,0.00018223582,0.00028617188,0.00018427138,0.00015373653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029070882,0.0001261319,0.00033134353,0.000023753062,0.0006907408,0.00014135793,0.0007393051,0.000291448,0.0004963594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033454322,0.00024971325,0.00014923877,0.000024022811,0.00082361506,0.00009128628,0.00017744409,0.0004839098,0.0000036358342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058977792,0.000056241628,0.0008525451,0.00006009468,0.0001683523,0.0011251647,0.008224153,0.000041476233,0.0000031931734,0.01585428,0.9296367,0.043918796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020439814,0.000015146148,0.00067708205,0.0005140424,0.00010751659,0.000005514202,0.002141417,0.000007220994,9.443574e-7,0.0013185808,0.99475205,0.00025611723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99902797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065115295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003547363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007508555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385861986","doi":"10.59962/9780774817554-001","title":"Preface and Acknowledgments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.027541284581789467,"score_gpt":0.226447934970267,"score_spread":0.19890665038847752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385861986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033833438,0.00037118237,0.0000065407758,0.000023518374,0.0002081166,0.0002972801,0.00015489556,0.000048386766,0.99550676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010939064,0.0008835583,0.0002496736,0.000012964818,0.000080588856,1.7679585e-7,0.000004184226,0.000013771162,0.98781604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904484,0.000028518165,0.00010812734,0.00031178133,0.00031451197,0.00019224593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992377,0.00005998921,0.0001516527,0.00018140626,0.00020494947,0.00016428159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017029185,0.00008372314,0.0002570206,0.000019611389,0.0004888303,0.00015287503,0.0003764811,0.00039958206,0.000765853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022922828,0.00021330152,0.000088036606,0.000003661278,0.0012470563,0.000104044266,0.00024179404,0.00031494777,0.0000109008715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013008663,0.00013042224,0.00056100014,0.0011433084,0.0004921187,0.001119717,0.02214817,3.3952878e-7,0.00021361116,0.10319275,0.3675032,0.5033653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018648819,0.000028546152,0.00022336253,0.00044273332,0.00010853581,0.000005899795,0.00024220221,4.6551108e-7,0.0000024725057,0.0030327116,0.9955172,0.00020940752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3841844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8383621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62801397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004434856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013899711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86981833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385865286","doi":"10.59962/9780774852159-004","title":"Policing, the Rule of Law, and Accountability in Canada: Lessons from the APEC Summit","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summit; Accountability; Political science; Rule of law; Law; Public administration; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.048875605153209656,"score_gpt":0.25145752088269385,"score_spread":0.2025819157294842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385865286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0838801,0.0005027465,0.0000014327949,0.0003021062,0.00008877638,0.0003548153,0.00084717036,0.000009100638,0.91401374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80662066,0.00044432245,0.000022407023,0.00024552795,0.000072019226,2.948496e-7,0.0000065182508,0.000011190476,0.19257706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883604,0.000076524935,0.00018307469,0.00024714926,0.00044529382,0.00021192292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987609,0.0005504172,0.00020633813,0.00027241142,0.0001400059,0.00006995559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044258716,0.00008110381,0.0002921134,0.000010190646,0.0004261435,0.00006667169,0.0006353991,0.00015922185,0.0001609606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027093083,0.00012267196,0.000073024974,0.00000941591,0.001679676,0.00006529616,0.00023048292,0.0002839016,3.2087706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037639608,0.00013315029,0.039247073,0.00054228125,0.0006145068,0.0006910857,0.09739355,0.000010485335,0.000018160179,0.5162512,0.13039273,0.21432936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025146184,0.0000139006725,0.042514082,0.00064759696,0.00014593093,0.0000018856803,0.007363368,0.0000023972384,0.0000022523482,0.00500742,0.9438243,0.0002254059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81343156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029223066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081626466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6188836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385871509","doi":"10.59962/9780774855938-014","title":"Appendix: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021394653704819504,"score_gpt":0.1972834519380624,"score_spread":0.1758887982332429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385871509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043281815,0.00048784135,0.0000020737205,0.000026142545,0.00010977348,0.0002791269,0.0005648942,0.000019930761,0.99418205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097043484,0.00066800445,0.00006895925,0.00001594593,0.00006149138,1.3646516e-7,0.00001380179,0.000010716885,0.90211743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898106,0.000031304455,0.00014449855,0.0002765921,0.00032588153,0.00024066927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991351,0.000045136894,0.00017074218,0.00017729828,0.0001832113,0.0002885237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011140374,0.000088233166,0.0003409552,0.000054325952,0.00050438306,0.000052950458,0.00036059594,0.00030791637,0.00082195085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065428785,0.00020575692,0.000110983514,0.0000060116267,0.0017609737,0.0000950622,0.000083239975,0.00016927482,0.00000862377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041545514,0.00003165779,0.00026174908,0.00030716535,0.00026189347,0.0020899477,0.018487018,4.3333594e-7,0.0000063378247,0.04831108,0.8918131,0.038388085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019359196,0.00003879424,0.00032457316,0.00047961244,0.00008374251,0.000023138356,0.00020757176,9.784269e-7,8.774134e-7,0.0020121308,0.99642384,0.00021115202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99686694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10461075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008564872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031461538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8999785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385894989","doi":"10.59962/9780774880077-004","title":"Specific Claims in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03042405532981092,"score_gpt":0.20148688688461802,"score_spread":0.17106283155480712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385894989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00626498,0.00027377869,0.0000022583888,0.000027306134,0.00028634243,0.00025315586,0.00022222984,0.000020677693,0.99264926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037299562,0.0007312165,0.00006217462,0.000024059495,0.00011742506,1.4498876e-7,0.000006512164,0.000014062887,0.96174484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986713,0.00004418483,0.00016869693,0.00033560017,0.0005018493,0.0002783838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923104,0.000072118,0.00016106281,0.00021472384,0.0001787347,0.00014229491],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001703773,0.00008414984,0.00031600843,0.000027164333,0.00025684226,0.00008513734,0.00057137635,0.00021064341,0.0034881977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000062234226,0.0002358433,0.0000875493,0.000008795337,0.00073892245,0.000076161305,0.0001452176,0.00023385002,0.000013896945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003134437,0.000012638901,0.00019871052,0.00009229076,0.000040229068,0.0015643364,0.0026825857,5.774383e-7,0.0000017798051,0.008181867,0.93956023,0.047633413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001676725,0.000019081494,0.00058844016,0.0005823534,0.00002627442,0.000004723074,0.0009711708,7.0513016e-7,5.030103e-7,0.0030966029,0.9943029,0.00023953969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99977523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054742705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070521986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015498961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385895032","doi":"10.59962/9780774880077","title":"By Law or In Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.032795647000853176,"score_gpt":0.247668856110957,"score_spread":0.21487320911010382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385895032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004407477,0.00023729434,0.000008284318,0.000023997873,0.0002239342,0.00032174427,0.00038360787,0.00004990433,0.9983105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029618957,0.00039412637,0.00012118606,0.000068275695,0.00014202938,3.9457413e-7,0.000016467571,0.000014451885,0.99628115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985837,0.00013787662,0.00016450841,0.00036223044,0.00043861775,0.00031308073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909955,0.00018662804,0.00017434898,0.00020320031,0.00019752207,0.00013872219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003266982,0.00008899271,0.00033758726,0.00002230293,0.00051498914,0.00016402113,0.00070551713,0.000392466,0.00080911856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051133266,0.0002133357,0.00009377839,0.000018610628,0.0017034828,0.00014701982,0.00019056605,0.0002480917,0.000015181853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039045517,0.000026787176,0.0000062390754,0.00019782859,0.000018567454,0.00031702322,0.0019205604,9.905669e-8,0.0000010637939,0.004641886,0.9881558,0.0046750978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028837717,0.00006415662,0.000021589398,0.00087381405,0.0001571578,0.0000052318014,0.0010580764,0.0000012424791,6.9035895e-7,0.00090332184,0.9963861,0.00024021356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8819046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1038697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002476927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048294975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8859281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385978443","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v10i1.4376","title":"Canada: A Pathfinder in Search of a Path","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Obligation; Law; General partnership; Pathfinder; Corporal punishment; Criminology; Section (typography); Repeal; Psychology; Geography; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.025083243410967192,"score_gpt":0.2615469655937457,"score_spread":0.2364637221827785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385978443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947735,0.00051947875,0.0000051706857,0.00069579366,0.000387565,0.00020193342,0.00015270094,0.000007627304,0.0032562201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852216,0.00012454491,0.00008119879,0.000074575815,0.00023377404,0.0000026034613,0.000008265857,0.000022077917,0.00093079],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997158,0.00024148196,0.00067323574,0.00025367038,0.00033000277,0.0013436144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684745,0.00019412728,0.00024088347,0.00024244782,0.0005014476,0.0019736686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015363311,0.00019703755,0.0004883707,0.00076889736,0.00061246584,0.000069989335,0.0007903452,0.000135016,0.00019682047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005405915,0.00018939497,0.00012817151,0.001508368,0.00083425554,0.00037652592,0.00002124524,0.00038010665,0.000007711253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012444203,0.00007486627,0.6771189,0.00032025683,0.00032729752,0.0127534205,0.17414156,0.0010127298,0.00012805655,0.08315562,0.01172635,0.039116476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009340266,0.00025588254,0.9284884,0.0018798572,0.000085360436,0.00069097994,0.004508563,0.000064452935,0.00022726976,0.02110332,0.041083235,0.0006787018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25136942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002107284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009381293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386125806","doi":"10.1177/10575677231197754","title":"Book Review: <i>The timing of guilty pleas: Lesson from common law jurisdictions</i> by Cheng, K.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06487509257758106,"score_gpt":0.40349005784142017,"score_spread":0.3386149652638391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386125806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020549023,0.88248867,0.00007532881,0.088348664,0.00095138606,0.00047591486,0.000156617,0.00009573652,0.027202196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005318001,0.9358202,0.00006084867,0.055171143,0.0005032457,0.00007698511,0.00016790169,0.000016658349,0.0028649815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973362,0.0003599335,0.0006922887,0.00030453957,0.001019415,0.0002876106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779725,0.0010016161,0.00036675544,0.00035883716,0.00036034032,0.00011519898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001604752,0.00017418432,0.00041502295,0.00003648163,0.0004553578,0.00005509352,0.0010647754,0.0000653269,0.0020209579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009873612,0.00014085554,0.00023329875,0.00034216695,0.00035015645,0.00037971366,0.0001612033,0.00026471636,0.00045823673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009246009,0.000038701226,0.0000072080743,0.0043654046,0.000035497567,0.000008558923,0.0011043879,0.0000015405286,0.000046341953,0.008267004,0.9769045,0.009211615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060737504,0.000019594727,0.0000340256,0.016486268,0.0015784134,0.000004651414,0.0007581374,0.00003545439,0.000055382945,0.00023258214,0.9805893,0.00014545226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006253076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006086138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05333157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013025635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009546731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386143797","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192859945.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sketch; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Process (computing); Human rights; Test (biology); Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07552678517021437,"score_gpt":0.32689772049016924,"score_spread":0.25137093531995486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386143797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.9175575e-7,0.000035661775,0.000014676851,0.027739706,0.0012999008,0.00006433141,0.0000013397091,0.00020045617,0.97064304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00014958146,0.00057952077,0.000036521476,0.000084670195,0.005262628,0.0000014631095,0.0000055305736,0.000013480887,0.9938666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993697,0.0000072074486,0.00008327816,0.00016901236,0.00025795805,0.00011284962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970734,0.000044995322,0.000033720007,0.000113413,0.00005222503,0.000048299225],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026684842,0.00006599026,0.00008671364,0.0000400316,0.00018783682,0.000037914706,0.000109492474,0.00014258722,0.009679546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006892268,0.00006305977,0.000055890734,0.000017375049,0.00013305567,0.00006393746,0.000024546474,0.00010969878,0.009723942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.354477e-7,3.985687e-7,2.1998794e-7,0.0000029652533,0.0000026279045,0.0000020752077,0.00018162491,1.0483158e-7,5.4828075e-7,0.67457944,0.32095873,0.004270425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060875527,0.000006273508,0.0000022598445,0.000013233811,0.0000122643,2.6780762e-7,0.00013525151,1.7373297e-7,0.0000012254908,0.092641406,0.90710694,0.00007462347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009811798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004838039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5861482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052813015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006716304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386572973","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4565804","title":"Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Constitutional Subordinates or Equal Partners?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.09885225845889264,"score_gpt":0.4022402447982665,"score_spread":0.3033879863393738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386572973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408833,0.0018119738,0.00064228236,0.035720848,0.0008957444,0.00034037212,0.000032949552,0.000080939055,0.019591602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358875,0.0025735544,0.00000648184,0.00010015838,0.00024512797,0.000007803593,0.000004450047,0.000004354186,0.0034693344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996694,0.00021895276,0.00027261514,0.00016075738,0.0005379151,0.0021157602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916565,0.00042831062,0.00009780466,0.000058147863,0.00009936831,0.00015071013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028805258,0.00010270773,0.00017007886,0.000090719994,0.0005635359,0.00006445865,0.00027422252,0.00005055317,0.00023997815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071672915,0.00008565296,0.000051068782,0.00061300397,0.0003473655,0.00026276617,0.000022043101,0.0008511496,0.0000438066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107837724,0.000016336478,0.008321225,0.0000026362943,0.000026055573,0.00012719144,0.0007658213,0.000042383755,0.0000136728,0.9856162,0.002324044,0.0026365863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015060523,0.0005717598,0.009810613,0.00015687227,0.0000570695,0.00040812127,0.24387217,0.00010389436,0.00015707356,0.5246687,0.2179753,0.0007123864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62227494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4609475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037670734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085057914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9850766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386576290","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4566150","title":"A Guide to the Revised Alberta Personal Property Security Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Computer security; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022122154100201564,"score_gpt":0.3288808928558761,"score_spread":0.3067587387556745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386576290","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31778026,0.0019339167,0.0002986645,0.56667435,0.0010511118,0.0009783455,0.000004371095,0.00019243376,0.11108652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947188,0.002909299,0.000009375738,0.0007523195,0.0010888426,0.0000125645,0.0000010182708,0.000012755835,0.10049497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647313,0.00029946916,0.00021955596,0.0001978632,0.00060108583,0.0022088664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933106,0.00015191553,0.0000770138,0.00014260739,0.00011799215,0.00017942271],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005943425,0.00011146822,0.00013760652,0.00006014908,0.0014081381,0.00017988317,0.0005762913,0.000055927736,0.00018973702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010789211,0.0000610486,0.00014600213,0.00057500415,0.00010066929,0.00022168744,0.00006756494,0.0010340507,0.00079853693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023463831,0.000100188256,0.0021811237,0.000028085735,0.00021154346,0.000035909492,0.09500045,0.00002847519,0.0004522335,0.36512327,0.40361595,0.13298813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000122019075,0.00011848593,0.0002728643,0.00003994414,0.000025207679,0.0000589958,0.017581679,0.00006154787,0.000008869585,0.01726982,0.96430784,0.00013272603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016338872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15799883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57693857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076833344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034680439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386578930","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000578576.55357.db","title":"Reasonable Doubt","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0607087812201191,"score_gpt":0.38314128467501046,"score_spread":0.3224325034548914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386578930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11917005,0.0013112791,0.000031127696,0.02725307,0.0047593564,0.0002175738,5.07981e-7,0.00007807949,0.84717894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7115717,0.0024291216,0.00005875628,0.00033315975,0.0019404569,0.000009555847,0.0000032536243,0.000010891868,0.28364313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986547,0.00008039914,0.00024029636,0.00021872912,0.00048063096,0.00032519302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993822,0.0000560719,0.00006652131,0.00024064217,0.00008482085,0.00016976747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006378517,0.00008852275,0.00016408421,0.000040556137,0.00019671959,0.0000040301256,0.00026960528,0.000056697627,0.069838345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003755637,0.00007070665,0.00005023337,0.00031827693,0.00010507418,0.00018669292,0.00002533506,0.000101994694,0.0021126776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018108874,0.000023139713,0.03731851,0.000027845615,0.0000075470807,0.0000030442714,0.009219472,0.0000021253652,0.0006386635,0.0738516,0.8751918,0.0036981432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013791927,0.0000730923,0.0025865126,0.000044644996,0.0000139894155,4.9165385e-7,0.0054804087,0.000005497767,0.000015665326,0.0025904821,0.98895526,0.00009605229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031201418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056637293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5924016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003801676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007611275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386927580","doi":"10.7202/1094115ar","title":"La notion d’accident dans le cours normalde l’usage d’une automobile reliéeà l’application de la Loi sur l’assurance automobile à la lumière de l’affaire Rossy","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.013921280995494183,"score_gpt":0.30828928304414926,"score_spread":0.2943680020486551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386927580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8557533,0.0036906754,0.008624518,0.02748997,0.0009949266,0.00071658974,0.00009739213,0.0007372491,0.101895384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823386,0.008231427,0.0030778379,0.00013976132,0.0005502047,0.00031344203,0.000050939216,0.000080000515,0.0052177985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937651,0.002845936,0.00070468825,0.00082610786,0.00079778564,0.0010603659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499726,0.0030855767,0.00051654305,0.0005680665,0.0003961303,0.00043640964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006869736,0.0005204131,0.0005349172,0.0001264045,0.0013455447,0.0007041991,0.000810757,0.0010700814,0.00013533888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010765898,0.00057873526,0.0002971882,0.00085926417,0.003148551,0.0024685229,0.00009502041,0.0013851373,0.00013824903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032721926,0.0021680729,0.12991533,0.0010896099,0.00020816512,0.00028445493,0.043634076,0.0519915,0.040312976,0.15689988,0.026720313,0.5464484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008134709,0.00025324253,0.46757257,0.0013588264,0.00029492172,0.00042150216,0.0053127245,0.025262427,0.007146906,0.010475179,0.47997046,0.0011177652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044166155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08159423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54533064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006026664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010968174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386941184","doi":"10.7202/1091880ar","title":"Obligation de défendre : conflit d’intérêts de l’assureur","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep de Jonquière","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1487556443896438,"score_gpt":0.3487553981621955,"score_spread":0.19999975377255166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386941184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52664727,0.019294476,0.004644788,0.06312752,0.0023430975,0.00046302303,0.000054125085,0.0004211248,0.38300458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707684,0.009513781,0.006079902,0.0005633174,0.0004952535,0.000036923444,0.000007864209,0.000025629482,0.012508912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966798,0.0012644457,0.00039999984,0.00040756055,0.00044514454,0.00080309383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983652,0.0005195539,0.00022747114,0.00023441666,0.00032366812,0.00032965647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026511515,0.00026520088,0.00029212507,0.00008389732,0.0005593052,0.00018845401,0.0003875214,0.00037343387,0.0010171414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086387194,0.00028698402,0.00015562095,0.0004485303,0.0012644152,0.0015350183,0.000041669366,0.000374181,0.00033361805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020217597,0.00042839424,0.078664534,0.0005155741,0.00015145006,0.00011937644,0.12192005,0.0010250965,0.0007720016,0.5034587,0.037101023,0.25564164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041624473,0.00049444934,0.36814663,0.0017301169,0.0003775839,0.00009764504,0.008129992,0.0029510069,0.006785111,0.17506345,0.43487647,0.00093128183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029508345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011683224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44412112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043217023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036018222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387245819","doi":"10.32920/24233083.v1","title":"The Administration of Justice? Certificate Proceedings, Charkaoui II, and the Value of Disclosure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Certificate; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Terrorism; Public administration; Administration (probate law); United States National Security Agency; Economic Justice; National security; Value (mathematics); Service (business); Human rights; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.15356717561659314,"score_gpt":0.375232122248321,"score_spread":0.22166494663172784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387245819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71808803,0.001257338,0.00008285748,0.19909202,0.0015904503,0.0019876028,0.00004922382,0.000121462275,0.07773101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022007,0.0020013703,0.00004737683,0.000020339927,0.00017632695,0.00003965938,0.0000023839343,0.000006634543,0.0074858516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987786,0.000073704185,0.00034024296,0.00021298659,0.00043818002,0.00015632175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987474,0.0004987475,0.0003309821,0.00016941648,0.0002114029,0.0000420446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022776145,0.000100794095,0.00020196395,0.000018903123,0.00071384414,0.00011162916,0.00047474442,0.00012439229,0.000016587539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008687721,0.00005130072,0.0000867505,0.000116013936,0.001243766,0.00006369552,0.00033500217,0.00020178311,0.0000022153554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025875084,0.000024753464,0.0003276974,0.00046795481,0.00003822604,4.0955166e-7,0.019431585,0.0000066419702,0.00012752801,0.97347575,0.00485664,0.0009840584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011623688,0.00051444356,0.06559795,0.0022185477,0.003095264,0.000006314411,0.27388123,0.0029822506,0.008042405,0.55231905,0.08902116,0.0011590156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002516275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020833754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4211567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015604608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021796342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5490384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387245896","doi":"10.32920/24233083","title":"The Administration of Justice? Certificate Proceedings, Charkaoui II, and the Value of Disclosure","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Political science; Terrorism; Agency (philosophy); Certificate; Public administration; United States National Security Agency; Economic Justice; National security; Administration (probate law); Human rights; Service (business); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.15356717561659314,"score_gpt":0.375232122248321,"score_spread":0.22166494663172784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387245896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71808803,0.001257338,0.00008285748,0.19909202,0.0015904503,0.0019876028,0.00004922382,0.000121462275,0.07773101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99022007,0.0020013703,0.00004737683,0.000020339927,0.00017632695,0.00003965938,0.0000023839343,0.000006634543,0.0074858516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987786,0.000073704185,0.00034024296,0.00021298659,0.00043818002,0.00015632175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987474,0.0004987475,0.0003309821,0.00016941648,0.0002114029,0.0000420446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022776145,0.000100794095,0.00020196395,0.000018903123,0.00071384414,0.00011162916,0.00047474442,0.00012439229,0.000016587539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008687721,0.00005130072,0.0000867505,0.000116013936,0.001243766,0.00006369552,0.00033500217,0.00020178311,0.0000022153554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025875084,0.000024753464,0.0003276974,0.00046795481,0.00003822604,4.0955166e-7,0.019431585,0.0000066419702,0.00012752801,0.97347575,0.00485664,0.0009840584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011623688,0.00051444356,0.06559795,0.0022185477,0.003095264,0.000006314411,0.27388123,0.0029822506,0.008042405,0.55231905,0.08902116,0.0011590156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002516275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020833754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4211567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015604608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021796342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5490384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387307864","doi":"10.32920/24237007","title":"Whither International Law? Security Certificates, the Supreme Court, and the Rights of Non-Citizens in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International human rights law; Principle of legality; Human rights; International law; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Public international law; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.04491864003135857,"score_gpt":0.3040954948744174,"score_spread":0.2591768548430588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387307864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3458844,0.00033582965,0.000037037993,0.3263374,0.0032392028,0.0012176412,0.00020559123,0.000045037177,0.32269785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958519,0.00019123021,0.000014050718,0.00025005455,0.00013226908,0.000027131664,0.000005802073,0.0000055149835,0.003522054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986273,0.00019318002,0.00025708147,0.00022589834,0.00051554653,0.00018099556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988494,0.00064822374,0.00011229696,0.00023994826,0.00010646843,0.000043642518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011660376,0.00010341843,0.00019183241,0.000020568543,0.00021716578,0.00008455298,0.00073966105,0.000077543365,0.00029308983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009232357,0.00005456434,0.00004983151,0.00007511344,0.000685568,0.000041914234,0.0003531133,0.00031566733,0.0000055905366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014360817,0.000037999594,0.010120928,0.0000922721,0.00013311222,0.000025642345,0.05132113,0.00018158485,0.000009993087,0.8216452,0.116002835,0.00028568137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080732093,0.000011109971,0.031996995,0.00045964797,0.0001036241,0.0000028090942,0.03185977,0.004229928,0.00020102378,0.67808765,0.25169936,0.0005407748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9987274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6499675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020097585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067083555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32091284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388068924","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0015","title":"What’s in a Name: Who Benefits From The Publication Ban In Sexual Assault Trials:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pseudonym; Sexual assault; Criminal trial; Law; Fair trial; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control","score_opus":0.1953837229529289,"score_gpt":0.36497961424524067,"score_spread":0.16959589129231176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388068924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050780564,0.009109513,0.0000055620394,0.0797079,0.0011972303,0.0011494092,0.00006178383,0.000083742496,0.90360683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045486353,0.023924029,0.00007389154,0.0022265133,0.0016287916,0.00007285253,0.00014200725,0.000040403305,0.92640513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974586,0.0003060299,0.00067606894,0.00045620927,0.00081174774,0.0002913536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997344,0.0017552365,0.00028701843,0.00034672816,0.00017916784,0.00008784678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003454616,0.0002123476,0.00051837415,0.00011559527,0.00022089976,0.000429068,0.000622219,0.0005681158,0.002224887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016701862,0.00015515459,0.00010422539,0.00010302351,0.00024213834,0.0008590352,0.00007575372,0.00052004727,0.00023955453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006050793,0.0000417683,0.000558867,0.000007958174,0.000026999678,0.00001537074,0.026297398,0.0000064112564,0.0000015220498,0.61757296,0.14974879,0.20566143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021134526,0.00002319754,0.0026146274,0.0003040963,0.000021057393,6.349904e-7,0.0051326086,0.00001182563,0.0000010567398,0.005904674,0.9855287,0.00024614745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08323848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44894123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83577996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004362189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388120969","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0008","title":"The New Zealand Bill of Rights Experience","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Parliament; Charter; Political science; White paper; Law; Government (linguistics); White (mutation); Fundamental rights; Public administration; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.0371073726653522,"score_gpt":0.3102528343357002,"score_spread":0.27314546167034803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388120969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000083792605,0.0005680854,0.000003038262,0.0032953466,0.00020880777,0.000120984325,0.0000019963272,0.000026429167,0.99569154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016922975,0.0018837177,0.000038434588,0.00006876747,0.0003197356,0.0000015781656,7.4279745e-7,0.0000067040355,0.98075736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998975,0.000016384567,0.00020415142,0.00018003165,0.00043034175,0.00019410024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992766,0.00022167359,0.00009443835,0.00024100344,0.00004783336,0.00011850158],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016855249,0.000117309166,0.00016071867,0.000021947786,0.00044130586,0.000054672197,0.00044690273,0.00014864565,0.005736691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001921316,0.00005836146,0.0000975804,0.000021833659,0.0006080371,0.00008531636,0.00002767177,0.00010853742,0.00021218463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013977136,0.0000023586429,0.0000044314793,0.0000011087818,0.000006480402,0.000003446827,0.0062113684,1.773914e-7,0.0000016305834,0.88134825,0.10475321,0.007653567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020000733,0.000015039216,0.000004784528,0.000041060375,0.000009254079,5.426367e-7,0.00013824894,1.3716108e-7,0.000020120671,0.2501836,0.7494879,0.000079343095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06294945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03803352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027471406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018481679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388146991","doi":"10.1515/9781773851181-008","title":"The Text Book Edition of James Kent’s Commentaries Used in Canada v. Gerring","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0340172747017374,"score_gpt":0.2149737153614228,"score_spread":0.18095644065968539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388146991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020574102,0.00068811193,0.000024038472,0.00083554117,0.00019507395,0.00026168433,0.00003420927,0.000011642472,0.99774396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06930738,0.0016210821,0.00008888689,0.00059073826,0.00016427868,7.130707e-7,0.000026484207,0.000025734462,0.9281747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.000058857157,0.00016191392,0.00015198025,0.00042760352,0.00014813652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.00036481768,0.00021240479,0.0001441187,0.0000642675,0.0000774193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012724698,0.000111047615,0.0002398545,0.000029361998,0.0003239258,0.000013413589,0.0004239051,0.00009140574,0.000094821706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020952313,0.000116655145,0.00007813897,0.0000055506357,0.00059576856,0.000083013554,0.0001515432,0.00021551645,8.9259856e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018704816,0.000006592997,0.00021380594,0.00013288893,0.00007371619,0.00008410502,0.01338173,0.000005659594,0.000011104892,0.9349493,0.044993218,0.005960872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013686653,0.000019578747,0.000072182855,0.00022369031,0.000054086082,2.1445899e-7,0.0029132399,0.0000133620615,0.000082289705,0.00093260146,0.995439,0.00011288584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9761162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003483949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096456986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47570586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147000","doi":"10.1515/9781773851181-003","title":"Family Defamation in the Quebec Civil Courts: The View from the Archives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.054873643064652686,"score_gpt":0.23531563273843217,"score_spread":0.1804419896737795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018036249,0.0014133368,0.00027359862,0.0022859375,0.00008367461,0.0004678799,0.000027775584,0.000020819793,0.9952466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073378704,0.0053536217,0.00021183194,0.003834506,0.000622253,0.0000032214011,0.000064961554,0.0000399354,0.916491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987128,0.00033739695,0.00014148653,0.00020681029,0.0004630005,0.00013851168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983118,0.0011142743,0.00017861555,0.00031683242,0.00003551428,0.00004296104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003264959,0.00014062217,0.00020382395,0.000019707995,0.0005333411,0.00005691225,0.0012488542,0.00012005387,0.00006099451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003170803,0.00008861128,0.00014784957,0.000008786638,0.0011342306,0.00007483783,0.00017483163,0.00040275717,0.000010854156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005574004,0.000005002884,0.000007938486,0.000021749376,0.000034081902,0.000025148149,0.056095555,0.0000018975085,0.000006148371,0.9223425,0.0033114457,0.018092828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009412195,0.000014621123,0.0005197153,0.00026801164,0.000137725,3.270335e-7,0.004805032,0.000030833497,0.0000015021834,0.018348826,0.97566736,0.00011194105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20268792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29465976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038413484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021510842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8026214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147586","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199278091.003.0012","title":"Oral Confessions To Non-Investigator Witnesses","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Quarter (Canadian coin); Criminology; Criminal investigation; Recall; Psychology; Political science; Law; History; Geography; Cognitive psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06620973512286499,"score_gpt":0.3456236893756851,"score_spread":0.2794139542528201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010357046,0.000064371554,0.00021697624,0.011725695,0.0005275489,0.00028157255,0.000016490678,0.000110773166,0.986953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021988768,0.000042131447,0.0006996564,0.0020740672,0.00060713454,0.00001060911,0.000010990957,0.000025448368,0.9745412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864733,0.000019002135,0.00021835059,0.0003304313,0.00047607394,0.0003088206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988893,0.00012621439,0.00007546803,0.00022737344,0.00015653431,0.00052510423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002323197,0.00021055347,0.00028943448,0.000076985685,0.00048630685,0.000107951055,0.00035062298,0.0002833648,0.0043747798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001669021,0.00018234114,0.00010421168,0.000042469925,0.00046363065,0.00012250694,0.00008612193,0.00018273006,0.0017806483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002505539,0.0000041481576,0.000022852168,0.000009692128,0.000004357451,0.000013339215,0.0002866336,0.0000011009599,0.00001161161,0.55967796,0.4394662,0.0004995925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033705594,0.000025403651,0.000031898995,0.0002232892,0.000037187387,7.3513235e-7,0.00020741337,6.6693127e-7,0.000029645227,0.021121312,0.9780055,0.00028320213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011681635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019665388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53855664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008146198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008034554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147707","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199571796.003.0003","title":"Tock-Tick: The Working of a Judicial Mind","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Sentence; Statement (logic); Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.08734618662814995,"score_gpt":0.32747795583048667,"score_spread":0.2401317692023367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007872412,0.00045833006,0.000015002413,0.0042513562,0.00022425182,0.00017586128,0.000001283703,0.000013312246,0.99478185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17681994,0.00019550674,0.00013400505,0.00033586888,0.000983724,0.0000011417231,9.0906497e-7,0.000008683049,0.8215202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989438,0.000023278886,0.00021378713,0.00016490881,0.0004758616,0.00017833333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993445,0.0002139696,0.00014501573,0.0001789142,0.000065107626,0.000052493226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045243042,0.00011679999,0.00020446835,0.000034297558,0.00028351572,0.00004135093,0.000368421,0.0001827987,0.001252482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006721744,0.00007983687,0.0001432887,0.000029583533,0.00039950592,0.00004027224,0.000039612965,0.00018414881,0.00008772393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010422511,0.000004389177,0.000006585223,0.0000037568561,0.000010232074,0.000005325719,0.0022723216,4.7281927e-7,0.0000028589825,0.8889397,0.0052117407,0.103532195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434225,0.00003123839,0.000024137766,0.00020492818,0.000058976464,7.8494304e-7,0.0005364035,6.496212e-7,0.000009470532,0.06639084,0.93260694,0.00011129285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001816655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011088336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92739516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041735646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002241812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388183427","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195141245.003.0004","title":"Penal Developments in English-Speaking Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05359571719700974,"score_gpt":0.31210331109604794,"score_spread":0.2585075938990382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388183427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010760599,0.00029227856,0.000011278357,0.00042444107,0.00048661345,0.0001472569,0.0000023532245,0.00007762105,0.9984506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038354453,0.0016394847,0.00020292836,0.00035332132,0.0005710768,0.000004397665,0.000006290804,0.00001886535,0.9588492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853987,0.000018625864,0.00026448639,0.0002702142,0.0005765152,0.0003302749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994183,0.00013208044,0.00008957367,0.00010762008,0.00016450767,0.00008792893],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053264067,0.00017407925,0.00022954716,0.00010972233,0.00025675618,0.00012868358,0.00030130433,0.00025460692,0.005921346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011991071,0.00016946883,0.000055131946,0.000037183916,0.00022625146,0.00024186989,0.000069475565,0.00023764627,0.00045107811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010429704,0.000004289091,0.00067941606,0.000014482496,0.000007935992,0.00007632935,0.015634887,3.9374336e-7,1.2585122e-7,0.97632974,0.0031454694,0.0040964694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006156661,0.0000064992932,0.00017146039,0.00025364308,0.000009024225,0.0000010174626,0.0007738865,1.744481e-7,0.0000014574752,0.0047641858,0.99372035,0.00023675583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041732425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0653782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99057484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029733285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004323174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99498737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417797","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198256977.001.0001","title":"Contempt Of Court","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Political science; Human rights; Convention","score_opus":0.05053437488703912,"score_gpt":0.33709853552399544,"score_spread":0.28656416063695633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000119861625,0.00042083763,0.0000054695083,0.0011491423,0.00013746452,0.00009832868,0.0000074260006,0.000028918788,0.99814045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059712618,0.00057391095,0.000037786034,0.00014668713,0.00026318803,0.0000014052579,0.0000040839363,0.000006176733,0.9929955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992543,0.000028133658,0.00015009221,0.00011374332,0.00032919887,0.00012457483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956465,0.00012600562,0.00006702237,0.000118868826,0.00006419716,0.000059277205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024400972,0.00007189399,0.00019234724,0.000026994823,0.00008523753,0.00001482148,0.00022432776,0.00017043689,0.0102369385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030420404,0.000064610715,0.00008707402,0.00002245701,0.00032336242,0.000051869472,0.000012354349,0.000090897745,0.00038796387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057847087,0.00000562527,0.0000046522487,0.000017929713,0.0000067245355,0.0000030332935,0.0009352134,1.005991e-7,5.182191e-7,0.26759428,0.72781956,0.0036065697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002483205,0.000017078868,0.000004408763,0.00009666436,0.000018991503,2.2688646e-7,0.00020962073,1.7142385e-7,0.000004023451,0.009388129,0.9901579,0.00007792257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030502686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022908265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26233837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060405746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006771388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388432072","doi":"10.61737/tnps5755","title":"Cadre juridique applicable à l’utilisation de la reconnaissance faciale par les forces de police dans l’espace public au Québec et au Canada : éléments de comparaison avec les États-Unis et l’Europe : rapport","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.09604136630153566,"score_gpt":0.335079966514459,"score_spread":0.23903860021292334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388432072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5245658,0.0005530283,0.005965776,0.03667307,0.000407152,0.0008089657,0.00018828393,0.0001934102,0.4306445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619556,0.0030562168,0.00057520927,0.001833911,0.00072012935,0.00020218464,0.00013891332,0.00009597141,0.031421848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245286,0.002175568,0.0010524833,0.0011815092,0.0012996837,0.0018379121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541503,0.001344266,0.0009821844,0.0005488291,0.00048369178,0.001225974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046056267,0.0008278646,0.0010715771,0.00011406436,0.003104577,0.0004422248,0.0012692482,0.00072214624,0.00041359384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001140612,0.000875776,0.00029398326,0.00082689396,0.0019817401,0.0007149394,0.00027420744,0.0012443332,0.000020896077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010607419,0.00027412342,0.6883155,0.0014093941,0.0002830281,0.00017312773,0.1428485,0.0007273639,0.0006900117,0.09283018,0.061926,0.010416686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018000566,0.00008039916,0.09101053,0.00030547008,0.00017984651,0.00012241569,0.018555671,0.0003159038,0.000716408,0.00015176686,0.88755596,0.00082563167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82562995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00869047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13471186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388435064","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199246342.005.0001","title":"The Canadian Charter of Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Human rights; Political science; Law; Civil rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.0453343866732524,"score_gpt":0.2943468934764826,"score_spread":0.24901250680323017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388435064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000074306913,0.00022521206,8.314966e-7,0.006421916,0.00025520302,0.0000964134,0.0000044263465,0.000009865732,0.9929787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04989218,0.0002856871,0.0000062471618,0.00016020011,0.00028051843,0.0000011783346,0.0000013526763,0.000005114387,0.9493675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927986,0.000011533948,0.0001214147,0.00010359452,0.00027775404,0.00020582438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944526,0.00008891456,0.000054893855,0.00016193738,0.00009318324,0.0001558252],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002678242,0.00007743115,0.00010313741,0.00003328956,0.0008956887,0.000052088566,0.0002822409,0.00016004874,0.0045957076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012834341,0.000047916972,0.00007189321,0.000013032043,0.00042497605,0.000040298404,0.0000106106945,0.000108948225,0.00037251879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.445894e-7,4.5992616e-7,0.000003558845,0.0000011671203,0.0000056840972,0.000005788717,0.000461777,1.16768755e-8,7.757642e-8,0.95547545,0.042323537,0.0017215156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086920945,0.0000066564435,0.000010700977,0.00002494241,0.000010809777,5.1232905e-7,0.00005625142,1.5300498e-7,0.0000011456852,0.1220166,0.8778005,0.000062993226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8961278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.835477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010993394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004237359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388435236","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199246342.001.0001","title":"Fair Trial Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to a fair trial; Political science; Law; International human rights law; Charter; Convention; Reservation of rights; Criminal justice; Ex post facto law; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.06271582959452816,"score_gpt":0.3561109550655135,"score_spread":0.29339512547098534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388435236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016339653,0.00009777716,0.000028137765,0.0013049023,0.0012870331,0.0003326421,0.0000022915488,0.00011957431,0.99681133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00041321863,0.00014626529,0.00005226453,0.00015517828,0.0040950878,0.000007628905,0.000008381389,0.000008256702,0.99511373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987778,0.000057225272,0.00017123562,0.00023247697,0.0005037097,0.00025752216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993982,0.00016966416,0.000071999326,0.00017160007,0.00005989695,0.00012867886],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003599102,0.00012607752,0.00021157652,0.000042617743,0.00043148317,0.00008867656,0.0003460633,0.0003310352,0.010378569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000537633,0.00010205297,0.00014822365,0.000045321594,0.00023737243,0.00011411414,0.000031015268,0.0001839454,0.0019275515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021761117,0.000010870293,1.3936643e-7,0.0000030589442,0.0000046618693,0.00001667434,0.00033562456,2.4731866e-8,2.8334469e-8,0.39599875,0.6025579,0.0008546591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001045226,0.000048747606,2.808163e-7,0.000033061006,0.000025800155,4.9140914e-7,0.00006054621,1.0987563e-7,5.1745087e-7,0.10881878,0.889823,0.00014340226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065167104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029810378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28726515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019299545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065974967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439169","doi":"10.7202/1091950ar","title":"L’obligation de défendre de l’assureur de responsabilité civile en droit québécois : aide-mémoire de doctrine et de jurisprudence","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Obligation; Political science; Doctrine; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.035410507157508986,"score_gpt":0.35260473368603334,"score_spread":0.31719422652852436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410807,0.008793414,0.00809313,0.12580726,0.00030505468,0.00037918537,0.000047075737,0.00033565288,0.015158522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96527034,0.013207828,0.013756669,0.0021672542,0.00063506945,0.00006706163,0.000012326201,0.000035354744,0.004848119],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921582,0.0042293803,0.00066193496,0.0006952919,0.0007350493,0.0015201588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951216,0.0032006674,0.0003297753,0.000434988,0.0003186255,0.0005943418],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096719405,0.00044225238,0.00049430743,0.00017579792,0.000753969,0.00041146748,0.00076391746,0.0006185354,0.00018600389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005484941,0.0005069211,0.00026668882,0.00091738754,0.0008604434,0.0019191105,0.00005975439,0.0008342035,0.000066359105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011355923,0.0010629899,0.18802331,0.0008215081,0.00016159951,0.00041377574,0.11229414,0.04716631,0.017317628,0.25160244,0.023343269,0.35665745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005297502,0.00090392714,0.683815,0.0023290627,0.00033116242,0.00031848508,0.0049731266,0.007827372,0.010754431,0.13883373,0.14836024,0.0010236857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08992864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11176506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4957917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003293531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028895552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388445333","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4619067","title":"Submission to Justice Canada on the Criminalization of Coercive Control","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.028107110426717093,"score_gpt":0.3143298831449935,"score_spread":0.2862227727182764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388445333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.814619,0.0006104459,0.004915898,0.16499473,0.0013700038,0.0005757917,0.000008941803,0.000057542125,0.012847623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608546,0.0007143194,0.0000024729377,0.00070008234,0.00023101961,0.0000033723763,6.920296e-7,0.0000059580484,0.0022566312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979929,0.00021125378,0.00015770756,0.00009211921,0.00055966765,0.0009863735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912846,0.00043027537,0.00009148347,0.00008471822,0.00016669082,0.0000983678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002476478,0.00006288435,0.00009444643,0.000048396203,0.0006814556,0.000030119932,0.00027876976,0.000030385272,0.00005440459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001110113,0.000043774562,0.00003787253,0.0003664031,0.000046863457,0.00006533664,0.000012483394,0.00040120733,0.000023878549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012952466,0.000015786633,0.00029568662,0.000009886257,0.000026666165,0.000006217723,0.003379253,0.00059458683,0.0004067382,0.96617746,0.02333451,0.005623665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012091245,0.0015959999,0.008453479,0.0005137541,0.0006987869,0.000064220156,0.3774645,0.0008213394,0.0013283738,0.29381225,0.31331858,0.0007195723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27428687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8268733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67236525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007953593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005268178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9345522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388984871","doi":"10.1515/9780776625980-013","title":"Saskatchewan Penitentiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.04976794912855472,"score_gpt":0.2636307708269299,"score_spread":0.2138628216983752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388984871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038576018,0.00019001089,0.000040244537,0.00014527117,0.0002095718,0.00018760074,0.00004744731,0.000051179803,0.9990901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038951274,0.00011962184,0.0001910053,0.000015183517,0.0001324529,6.407986e-8,0.000006491595,0.000014245289,0.9605697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998933,0.000036944228,0.000118283504,0.0002781,0.0004201102,0.00021353984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879885,0.00006888954,0.00035358273,0.0004679579,0.00016442634,0.00014631187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464767,0.00016483884,0.00029522702,0.000067588044,0.0008309114,0.000045481975,0.0009860778,0.0003301964,0.00054530817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019234285,0.00021142724,0.00022607272,0.0000014117259,0.001206773,0.00013032713,0.00022280379,0.0002446182,0.000047332167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033094046,0.000010187365,0.000019239456,0.00009677336,0.00009121762,0.00019017963,0.013978815,4.6069866e-7,0.0000131968545,0.94325894,0.029010426,0.013297479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012165965,0.000021560907,0.000021577407,0.00021019316,0.0001734266,0.000001123876,0.0009880685,6.28319e-7,0.000022488457,0.0035435094,0.9946784,0.00021738121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048023693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06517982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96566796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006255221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036436733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389050268","doi":"10.29173/wclawr100","title":"The Plea of Innocence: Restoring the Truth to the American Justice System","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Plea; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07288576524903469,"score_gpt":0.392702693195836,"score_spread":0.31981692794680133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389050268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061152276,0.09998621,0.0003989945,0.7184488,0.011761925,0.006215826,0.000033445143,0.00087234343,0.10113014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95308065,0.043450307,0.000005956366,0.0017847824,0.00060412084,0.00014146167,8.322075e-7,0.000012162545,0.00091973465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715036,0.0013116051,0.0003852054,0.00018659316,0.0006324269,0.0003338152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590796,0.002784536,0.00031930686,0.0007069976,0.00021649754,0.000064719396],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007604569,0.00011580051,0.00024233469,0.000013869422,0.0028389364,0.00010899269,0.0011164754,0.000021000367,0.000019482808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014767523,0.000046886158,0.000107843625,0.0016217529,0.000865156,0.00010474812,0.00013475363,0.000208508,0.0004151416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019088066,0.000004357053,0.000027575368,0.0006007724,0.000022305316,0.0000011670379,0.0034740015,0.000044186636,0.00001501609,0.9598335,0.015556557,0.020401457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022092096,0.000031041436,0.0007086738,0.0010852497,0.00023513203,0.000004076651,0.014173771,0.000042268795,0.000010580651,0.00011393157,0.98350006,0.00007312686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077314707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027899449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109127504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097958466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389050279","doi":"10.29173/wclawr97","title":"Queer in Fear: The Role of Homophobia and Transphobia in Wrongful Convictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transphobia; Queer; Prejudice (legal term); Criminology; Criminal justice; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Transgender; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.027931934192261688,"score_gpt":0.3231997813060729,"score_spread":0.2952678471138112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389050279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55614954,0.20972519,0.000025422212,0.12468305,0.0011047423,0.004722642,0.000047811525,0.0003270353,0.103214584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91128963,0.0874337,0.000005301973,0.00063303387,0.000052777566,0.00009397709,0.000003194497,0.000010048432,0.00047834832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981557,0.00060343865,0.00043151726,0.00021468138,0.0002968104,0.0002978129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904925,0.00041278903,0.00010946478,0.00029879756,0.0000733832,0.000056306824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025758003,0.00012298433,0.00029859509,0.000053231175,0.0003855017,0.000039748105,0.00031825833,0.00007023366,0.00029755902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011820416,0.00008180819,0.000083957144,0.0011410259,0.000648861,0.0002242761,0.000041923075,0.00025526376,0.00012449788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053655458,0.00009744083,0.010744031,0.0010181498,0.00003631637,0.000010916903,0.023726985,0.00007405208,0.00051027926,0.9340898,0.0032268085,0.026411567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019633606,0.000030691688,0.015747825,0.0014031299,0.00007183562,0.0000061517094,0.0040797153,0.0000732759,0.00006076258,0.0042669177,0.9739183,0.00014506358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058058802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065623375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008327537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98310226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389107446","doi":"10.1163/9789004479593_003","title":"Preface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06794273723833068,"score_gpt":0.33578140403283735,"score_spread":0.2678386667945067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389107446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002538464,0.00050383114,0.000017328393,0.0052244663,0.00017613225,0.000096747484,0.0000021329913,0.00008782427,0.993889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001824292,0.00085362134,0.00023361623,0.00036448246,0.00090294244,0.0000012233345,0.0000015273756,0.000011099959,0.9958072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927443,0.0000073236297,0.00009850624,0.00016286982,0.00030359277,0.00015329411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996381,0.000053244825,0.00004238232,0.00013310848,0.000044258664,0.0000889467],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017361395,0.00009452915,0.00011322349,0.000022484222,0.00018308169,0.000043724383,0.00020492793,0.00019389612,0.022386476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002258647,0.00008654608,0.00007505761,0.000007043341,0.00016818417,0.00008648319,0.000031397933,0.0001281917,0.003366133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013054918,0.0000014596078,9.908052e-7,0.0000032561707,0.0000035908838,0.0000025724926,0.00046311916,1.8780983e-7,4.0943308e-7,0.9197739,0.06377717,0.015972044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012443092,0.0000072177886,0.0000026780438,0.000036214587,0.000015196308,3.7743897e-7,0.00007436384,2.4493306e-7,0.0000018447947,0.019667622,0.98006076,0.00012104536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089546386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008993941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007333322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012316578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332677","doi":"10.7202/1107386ar","title":"PERSPECTIVES POUR UN PRINCIPE DE SÉCURITÉ JURIDIQUE EN DROIT CANADIEN : LES PISTES DU DROIT EUROPÉEN","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.009678190695934698,"score_gpt":0.22155146753008895,"score_spread":0.21187327683415424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72605354,0.0073566833,0.0008527868,0.026020858,0.00021316031,0.00036809177,0.000044266213,0.00018040753,0.23891018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83798146,0.006067025,0.0015828668,0.0003708452,0.0010503343,0.000003573047,0.000006474268,0.000051337694,0.1528861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639547,0.00049956905,0.00036621362,0.00082123314,0.00039140906,0.0015261106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976913,0.00042888627,0.00023078502,0.00048962753,0.00023954212,0.00091987825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010069186,0.00043928478,0.0005314669,0.00019687778,0.0012287911,0.00013676347,0.0011816924,0.0005261575,0.0010216839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037356289,0.00064238,0.00039782378,0.00060620584,0.0005352321,0.0005176973,0.00018676357,0.0006745031,0.00017915855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278639,0.00025520648,0.008365737,0.00021080574,0.000109392895,0.0026215077,0.041978575,0.00033594525,0.0012963685,0.9274536,0.0012112044,0.016033787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012314266,0.00077742536,0.09571264,0.0015566179,0.00085850776,0.0015092216,0.030008186,0.0013667964,0.0022171633,0.11630455,0.7466595,0.00179795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06069622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81114906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012192743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014995937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389332922","doi":"10.7202/1106030ar","title":"LES DOMMAGES PUNITIFS EN DROIT QUÉBÉCOIS : TRADITION, ÉVOLUTION ET… RÉVOLUTION ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.026007284179518968,"score_gpt":0.25758895508544927,"score_spread":0.2315816709059303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389332922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6602462,0.017640932,0.008214204,0.012736003,0.0012686286,0.0003954852,0.000079418416,0.00022029688,0.2991988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098377,0.00449092,0.00069400173,0.00023001878,0.0013273113,0.000006480372,0.000039448256,0.000034027686,0.08334009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733216,0.0006174645,0.0002895848,0.00036461832,0.00035364577,0.0010425138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984125,0.00040457203,0.00018413886,0.0002969438,0.0001298397,0.0005720234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013358378,0.00027521246,0.0003080691,0.00016149777,0.0010399497,0.00006691419,0.0004440298,0.0004991103,0.0011679934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016887754,0.0004040754,0.0002857501,0.0005057802,0.00057051453,0.0014273821,0.000100218705,0.00046978483,0.00033892418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006875567,0.00022448541,0.009373163,0.0003470109,0.00006170801,0.00007162689,0.03456641,0.00021653845,0.0010061524,0.93315333,0.0040899836,0.016820855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004236003,0.0001230912,0.090708174,0.0007667594,0.00049118197,0.0002604595,0.015089908,0.00049009384,0.00037415882,0.011170663,0.8794915,0.0006104274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12327315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08459922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92198265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008035295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036826808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355440","doi":"10.7202/1105803ar","title":"DU NON-DROIT DE L’APPLICATION DE LA CHARTE CANADIENNE DES DROITS ET LIBERTÉS","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.014526274813882745,"score_gpt":0.24418930310009532,"score_spread":0.22966302828621257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7903639,0.0016087246,0.0077436003,0.0074022654,0.00020655394,0.0002700071,0.00002618147,0.00009015178,0.1922886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135995,0.002297084,0.0015538844,0.00054950244,0.0005137675,0.000011935264,0.000013549016,0.000044988108,0.08141581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741423,0.00038886172,0.00023433584,0.0004691607,0.0002312422,0.0012621774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764836,0.00032914768,0.0001553214,0.00035820433,0.00017839753,0.0013305979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021504927,0.0002576492,0.00031700378,0.00011450358,0.0006096297,0.00011392076,0.0006979854,0.00045946013,0.00017661878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024036995,0.00038267227,0.00017656675,0.00053606956,0.0006837749,0.00054105907,0.00015141393,0.00040147343,0.00022512744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016276169,0.0002030708,0.024176765,0.00040318756,0.00009130308,0.0009547634,0.077361725,0.0014283127,0.0028540317,0.8589387,0.006877591,0.026547803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007827056,0.00019018597,0.018528247,0.0006848641,0.0003463446,0.0006759416,0.005586374,0.006992569,0.00074185466,0.07923981,0.8855929,0.00063823914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12420987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1847109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8787153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011953114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011963026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389363178","doi":"10.7202/1105765ar","title":"LA « RAISONNABILITÉ » SELON DUNSMUIR : DICHOTOMIE ENTRE LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ET LA COUR D’APPEL DU QUÉBEC","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Valacta (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009245957935380033,"score_gpt":0.22109475811620077,"score_spread":0.21184880018082075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389363178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74571556,0.0025577797,0.000089369256,0.0323211,0.00049273635,0.00029072855,0.0000864861,0.0000991323,0.21834712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89009655,0.0013779672,0.00012265997,0.00053399266,0.00048563493,0.00000528266,0.000012825122,0.00004756219,0.10731754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962636,0.0012391979,0.00033780234,0.0005979187,0.0006226974,0.00093878835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965023,0.0015358848,0.00020149627,0.00041092094,0.00028300786,0.001066431],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019684446,0.00038930535,0.00050466816,0.00008244448,0.0005896364,0.00014622051,0.0008604025,0.000522411,0.0007420329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064014515,0.0004978765,0.00023958033,0.00041568372,0.0007521203,0.00047182207,0.00025410682,0.00063814886,0.000132806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051273784,0.00049483933,0.21853238,0.0009300987,0.00025656685,0.009761369,0.07944758,0.0016877201,0.00016255003,0.5103166,0.169174,0.008723544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009247321,0.00007982849,0.008465256,0.0004289256,0.00025394096,0.0005911875,0.016856099,0.0006691427,0.00005783428,0.0010336787,0.97009814,0.00054121984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9509502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8009242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010692925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009886887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389676937","doi":"10.1515/9780889778276-034","title":"Appendix: Timeline of Gehl v Canada","year":2021,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Appendix; History; Geography; Archaeology; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.038338869945772,"score_gpt":0.23051730310071977,"score_spread":0.19217843315494776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389676937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011107568,0.0029106387,0.00008749415,0.0022357788,0.00055651594,0.0003387953,0.00031812684,0.000021553798,0.9924203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033906553,0.001975644,0.00026948072,0.00003467993,0.00015464448,7.6565115e-8,0.000054242886,0.000020196358,0.9635845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980468,0.00009934801,0.00019580194,0.00046155413,0.00085882324,0.0003376394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979309,0.00019810675,0.00063814025,0.0005196928,0.0004892852,0.00022386972],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023619909,0.00028735088,0.00071123155,0.00007476855,0.0003422336,0.00001517601,0.0008917315,0.00032161677,0.0009367599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033187527,0.00037258526,0.0002709246,0.00001820747,0.001254351,0.00007403556,0.00037399412,0.0003326788,0.00002263705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027241648,0.0000386449,0.0000615125,0.0010472694,0.00052669685,0.0010717819,0.0056358944,0.000030170735,0.00012343151,0.8650352,0.11676942,0.009387557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002474653,0.000061612765,0.000008709896,0.00089615607,0.00039542106,0.0000033755964,0.002240235,0.000016944805,0.00033259683,0.00014958838,0.99532384,0.0003240478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88608414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81020445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002093193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017144345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390033283","doi":"10.7202/1106940ar","title":"La cessation de l’indemnisation du criminelde la route : une analyse constitutionnelle","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07570058635646965,"score_gpt":0.3611052929968608,"score_spread":0.28540470664039114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390033283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7195803,0.0025189128,0.010651505,0.108467385,0.0012795215,0.00028286083,0.00006063873,0.0005688046,0.1565901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795489,0.015242518,0.0008285486,0.00018462277,0.0004221252,0.000041901574,0.00006193907,0.000017257778,0.0036522334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962846,0.0019835983,0.00039880114,0.00038283694,0.00049194,0.00045821676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972114,0.0019658168,0.00021585562,0.00017354643,0.00026667127,0.0001667347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003440471,0.00022772736,0.00026253957,0.0001725314,0.0008949677,0.00032984972,0.00023973615,0.00036894277,0.00020534954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001363217,0.00024355593,0.00014282347,0.0014246758,0.001918884,0.0015598956,0.000044162254,0.0003121108,0.00029667807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010881863,0.00027407546,0.071039446,0.00041807923,0.00017422506,0.00015324795,0.068301104,0.09359115,0.00059412076,0.43122843,0.04934389,0.2847734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076443824,0.0001766215,0.43349916,0.0015645138,0.000679988,0.0000969521,0.036306612,0.049465433,0.0015904917,0.079032026,0.39590576,0.00091800373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028055456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014029038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3624597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037227172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038409207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99319226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390541916","doi":"","title":"Criminal liability for homicide in the Canadian Criminal Code","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Criminal code; Criminal liability; Criminology; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Law; Psychology; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.5279060530858918,"score_gpt":0.6087061334301103,"score_spread":0.08080008034421848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390541916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694069,0.002802792,0.00007845461,0.00372486,0.00053113536,0.0009830323,0.00007591784,0.000018259427,0.022378651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954658,0.002255062,0.0002502114,0.0011774602,0.0003556246,0.00008353251,0.00000586473,0.000021228865,0.00038518797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964451,0.0006626718,0.00072653015,0.00043870957,0.00093838334,0.00078859756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970606,0.0012183387,0.00037801175,0.00044428656,0.00043169648,0.00046705618],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053057806,0.00024364778,0.00054085586,0.0004562536,0.0020002483,0.0010023057,0.0040930356,0.00015116128,0.0023215592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001870646,0.0002005882,0.00022855376,0.00076527265,0.0008274737,0.0019591702,0.00020510616,0.00045802334,0.000013565211],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004287916,0.0003277178,0.83531225,0.00014885566,0.000039505187,0.00019773946,0.025822897,0.00009251441,0.0012314982,0.0072372556,0.12066571,0.008495258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002891966,0.000019186587,0.84792644,0.00016783972,0.00010648812,0.000028451244,0.004527604,0.000027647737,0.00071240606,0.007940543,0.1378996,0.00035460375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71694857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8196612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10271263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050527265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017803145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390694002","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4667906","title":"Informing the Debate on Lowering the Criminal Rate of Interest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interest rate; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05353096997292049,"score_gpt":0.3375794851894404,"score_spread":0.2840485152165199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390694002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568735,0.0041424166,0.0008833669,0.02759382,0.00082762714,0.00011576493,6.3907595e-7,0.00003208475,0.009530825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942235,0.0032262912,0.000002374218,0.0002071231,0.00046356375,0.0000023015182,1.2202447e-7,0.000007680037,0.0018670806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983745,0.00012222325,0.00020169167,0.00008976843,0.00019490128,0.0010168679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993397,0.00038728942,0.0000713716,0.00011034874,0.000050887615,0.000040420233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046648183,0.00008171199,0.00008281201,0.00004704795,0.000707486,0.00021155544,0.0004959732,0.000032910146,0.000042772084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022735063,0.000041901127,0.00011265153,0.00019147496,0.00022335791,0.0002545384,0.000038690072,0.0012911197,0.000040175335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037571062,0.000007173488,0.000025523597,0.000011100165,0.000041164694,0.0000077486475,0.008690589,0.000024129806,0.00020039588,0.9254844,0.000204677,0.065265514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020356539,0.00075040065,0.00035720711,0.0008043548,0.00024277417,0.0004953393,0.14733718,0.00027546048,0.0016578917,0.6299055,0.21765426,0.0003160425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008792417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013807095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29557887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035432508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014055514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7704683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600462","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1437","title":"“Silly Anecdotes”: From White Baselines to White Juries in R. v. Chouhan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); White paper; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.06038181993000382,"score_gpt":0.3639288062861421,"score_spread":0.3035469863561383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07996866,0.17457266,0.00015337986,0.60607237,0.0029941238,0.0044140588,0.00035065107,0.0015064498,0.12996766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71308106,0.23394427,0.0018226076,0.033330124,0.0020736647,0.0004062406,0.00019529166,0.00011492445,0.015031844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746704,0.00035339603,0.00050069334,0.00046854134,0.0006331734,0.000577158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987629,0.00027228633,0.00008406255,0.0004402521,0.00017443046,0.00026605494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002055151,0.00020714408,0.0005123513,0.000073683645,0.00033551536,0.000119037846,0.00058012747,0.00008824281,0.0014659992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000917769,0.00019077252,0.00014068956,0.0012201014,0.00018367013,0.00038618018,0.00014105055,0.0001681376,0.0021642076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006742642,0.00015204078,0.054711778,0.0032394163,0.00005566442,0.00025825674,0.015021071,0.00006705811,0.00020087087,0.11203221,0.7659986,0.048195634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007413556,0.000023613638,0.00540817,0.004149329,0.00004369312,6.286515e-7,0.00035060899,0.0000091367465,0.000014306742,0.0012618114,0.988403,0.00026157356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009743523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082035445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6331124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079442165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015458668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392456227","doi":"10.29173/wclawr108","title":"Wrongfully Convicted: Guilty Pleas, Imagined Crimes, and What Canada Must Do to Safeguard Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Safeguard; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.027691045812374113,"score_gpt":0.33729865197090986,"score_spread":0.3096076061585357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392456227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003309683,0.6244055,0.0002074309,0.30829003,0.0058231866,0.0022264854,0.000048596667,0.00039062634,0.055298436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6566007,0.30286056,0.00014476973,0.033405732,0.0013544206,0.0001691676,0.00002652187,0.00006241496,0.0053757173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739367,0.00047036246,0.00046493177,0.000509976,0.0006593735,0.00050167425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982848,0.00047566817,0.00008649056,0.0005119879,0.00027716137,0.00036385944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016689207,0.00026429447,0.00039546768,0.000034266675,0.0009609955,0.00095453707,0.0005127137,0.00007260839,0.0013540688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004053771,0.00019828674,0.000090782814,0.0005960323,0.0003978948,0.0011045227,0.0001367114,0.000312919,0.00031436086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033355685,0.0000200261,0.000018460152,0.0037927025,0.000083411964,0.000062468076,0.0024821924,0.000009924675,0.000046525773,0.6015337,0.29725862,0.09465858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067039815,0.000030805677,0.000115699426,0.003738637,0.00052572077,0.000033174787,0.0025241093,0.000020294397,0.000013847754,0.0003430004,0.9923235,0.00026412812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.507775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5334161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037917116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008944731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392607603","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4721464","title":"The 2023 Human Rights Based Approach Framework of the Ontario Human Rights Commission is a Major Leap Forward to Serve as an Example, but also to Be Improved","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Human rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03681389245677763,"score_gpt":0.33052608665280564,"score_spread":0.293712194196028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392607603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751911,0.0004505501,0.0023371854,0.013081825,0.00048240164,0.000819976,0.000006884513,0.000058799764,0.0075712353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97316676,0.000008190763,0.00031582304,0.0003834037,0.0004929925,0.000026970436,0.0000027692881,0.000022466607,0.02558065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959232,0.00043141827,0.00046188085,0.00043508297,0.00089703983,0.001851335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985413,0.00023657072,0.00015280517,0.0005350217,0.0001757654,0.00035855465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037198523,0.00024687508,0.00027423317,0.00010169677,0.0056198156,0.0005187323,0.0014504544,0.00018800651,0.00026819442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005259404,0.00013968523,0.00028692101,0.0005189228,0.00020211076,0.00029633372,0.00012460526,0.002109082,0.000028138373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001227047,0.00013260801,0.0001800098,0.00002008447,0.00013033896,0.000004825813,0.023731852,0.00001593102,0.0024530494,0.9687816,0.0036525726,0.00077445584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020227302,0.000922629,0.0004978238,0.00022118262,0.00012833446,0.000022440478,0.004602205,0.000042261152,0.0012903298,0.6361452,0.35562614,0.00029918356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48605725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93842787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45237064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015316784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019431744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392669592","doi":"10.7202/1109765ar","title":"Les règles de preuve devant la Chambre de la jeunesse : Une analyse en vertu des principes de justice fondamentale","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028766348811292877,"score_gpt":0.33630023841880774,"score_spread":0.3075338896075149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392669592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776758,0.004160816,0.0036022628,0.0036424787,0.0002268563,0.00021172599,0.00005389356,0.00021596723,0.010210201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656378,0.005697906,0.0032250008,0.00034826365,0.00039199702,0.00005495093,0.000013440369,0.00005197212,0.024578683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604,0.0013485603,0.00035160073,0.00048556793,0.0004505441,0.0013237302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622995,0.002731968,0.00015103302,0.00028977974,0.00007894737,0.0005183471],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029015949,0.00032778908,0.00037612751,0.00015860733,0.0012902592,0.00028383918,0.0006622419,0.0007336972,0.000114119845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015402943,0.00037262525,0.00025283275,0.0011061253,0.0031403652,0.0003803845,0.00014762137,0.00076810486,0.00011769194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028025729,0.00044532426,0.04489336,0.0022533562,0.0004297619,0.0024973124,0.4841469,0.004698298,0.009565991,0.32416964,0.0033874018,0.123232394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009215713,0.00032240915,0.20190558,0.0016769136,0.002867919,0.00047892088,0.36798325,0.008665672,0.006487308,0.11921767,0.28800407,0.001468697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031540386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016387945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28461668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036269315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072405825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392823229","doi":"10.29173/jaed123","title":"An Overview Of The Gambling Provisions In Canadian Criminal Law And First Nations Gambling","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.10113067130281615,"score_gpt":0.37719241642569107,"score_spread":0.2760617451228749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392823229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814091,0.0011721399,0.0000066620305,0.0045369384,0.0004804095,0.0001290198,0.0000034336974,0.0000030547799,0.012259283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964779,0.001750658,0.0013999287,0.00016156968,0.0001029816,0.00000230164,2.0495222e-7,0.0000049161645,0.000099512275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989029,0.00006004847,0.0004926154,0.000106308486,0.00017968657,0.0002584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999182,0.00012701078,0.0002559455,0.00008496297,0.00009599712,0.0002541121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011006072,0.00008023386,0.00017560372,0.00021514695,0.0005935219,0.00008406359,0.00029848955,0.000044055323,0.0001851331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007325967,0.00006617713,0.00004431817,0.00015044902,0.00013700683,0.0004931757,0.000013287709,0.00014759357,0.0000066381076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005157639,0.00028689453,0.09957679,0.0002834721,0.00008158874,0.00006832076,0.113851376,0.0028369674,0.00006763516,0.76557916,0.0012112597,0.016104944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002869138,0.000058514222,0.038959805,0.0006053688,0.00003211687,0.000038767383,0.004016833,0.00031001298,0.00010283196,0.00042368672,0.9549933,0.00017185934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13771208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92280465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071470096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015796976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86802995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019964","doi":"10.7202/1105761ar","title":"La place des autorités jurisprudentielles, de la doctrine et des faits d’intérêt public dans l’interprétation des lois au Canada : l’ascendance du contexte","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.026926064634788065,"score_gpt":0.33038732473353577,"score_spread":0.3034612600987477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10750303,0.64198697,0.0016218395,0.02026167,0.0011959431,0.00051222777,0.00009872343,0.00010246211,0.22671716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7409954,0.24532366,0.0013460285,0.0021672787,0.0003067265,0.000051843912,0.000020861104,0.000037924252,0.009750246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937488,0.0033705565,0.0006972032,0.00057585974,0.00064015226,0.00096746214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966707,0.0015875531,0.00029400823,0.00037179407,0.0005472334,0.0005286718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004205596,0.0003913174,0.0006841011,0.00002573971,0.0012405134,0.0004359023,0.0006060894,0.00020197955,0.0009257957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024046062,0.00040410613,0.00025894944,0.0008936587,0.0025863673,0.0010225668,0.00016342735,0.00045449284,0.00006947914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007129119,0.00017765997,0.007833605,0.0076198624,0.000095518866,0.00047763684,0.008727926,0.000008152187,0.000068336296,0.81288534,0.020035068,0.14206377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020786707,0.000045054177,0.0039320416,0.014347025,0.000293959,0.00028630527,0.0017798198,0.000023860135,0.00012837084,0.0018905216,0.9766532,0.00041198262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8659187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95661813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029380664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049910257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393281015","doi":"","title":"Procédures dématérialisées : éléments de droit comparé québécois, JCP G 2019, supplément au n° 14, du 8 avr. 2019, p. 56.","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Chemistry; Crystallography","score_opus":0.01396933778286938,"score_gpt":0.2481252936427909,"score_spread":0.23415595585992152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393281015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6422613,0.01661549,0.008348179,0.18680795,0.003926621,0.001975611,0.0002534925,0.0003731703,0.13943818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8290495,0.00496635,0.004233553,0.0006464214,0.0002872433,0.000058771104,0.00020099558,0.000060173432,0.16049697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946655,0.006392471,0.00082014117,0.0009613197,0.0011253796,0.0012341557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935681,0.0019623747,0.0006127564,0.0016093237,0.0016429037,0.00060454087],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009258113,0.0004715694,0.0005998321,0.00014342525,0.0012540709,0.00063220476,0.001952619,0.00036293382,0.0022807964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012974406,0.0005372464,0.00039921104,0.00070182374,0.0012671022,0.0008260741,0.00062595,0.0005221661,0.0018837176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081471444,0.0018155716,0.03902229,0.00036846992,0.00018560604,0.000014889734,0.09134281,0.00008112007,0.0019572275,0.70839643,0.13358657,0.023147527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011272987,0.0000048511997,0.016181841,0.0025066377,0.0001920467,0.000024110765,0.0025317096,0.0017513339,0.009314902,0.0067476197,0.9587288,0.0008888332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20784467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124933906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82514226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011279751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015771316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393404908","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i3.1307","title":"The Moral Foundation of Criminal Defences and the Limits of Constitutional Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.10634585772018647,"score_gpt":0.3563337948703247,"score_spread":0.24998793715013823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393404908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20614822,0.0010424058,0.00012797887,0.031387433,0.0020788985,0.00038253222,0.00003415509,0.00004480182,0.7587536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998972,0.00065391057,0.000071861294,0.00007932415,0.00013329874,0.0000024293308,6.1641106e-7,0.0000018401832,0.00008469521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880505,0.0002276175,0.00025317934,0.0000707066,0.0004719263,0.00017152973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986803,0.00080740027,0.00018416534,0.000067720684,0.00020506418,0.000055357796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022407353,0.00005299888,0.000111850626,0.000018304583,0.0053009465,0.00007884484,0.00022857779,0.000031191557,0.000037161255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002917254,0.000028966237,0.00006965478,0.00014782845,0.0060867392,0.0002446415,0.00003393389,0.00012332441,0.000008475375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219115,0.0000067414476,0.00017737577,0.000007097185,0.000012267326,0.0000021085473,0.00072126766,0.00002263835,0.000025514972,0.99634206,0.000113058886,0.0024976544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083425996,0.00012416748,0.0023108725,0.00015150056,0.0001502728,0.00007156404,0.01700954,0.00014142493,0.00071203406,0.18916258,0.7891904,0.00014134316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038548263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0205693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8071795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001983917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004011883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393860008","doi":"10.25071/pc5n3t08","title":"Federalism, Disaster Planning Standards and Canadian Charter Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Management","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Federalism; Environmental planning; Public administration; Political science; Business; Environmental science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05627912969639782,"score_gpt":0.35154815101218717,"score_spread":0.29526902131578936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393860008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6520074,0.0017394425,0.000105036466,0.039433006,0.0077710096,0.000433181,0.00009272432,0.000035049186,0.29838318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99185085,0.00027736704,0.000036596513,0.00021541567,0.00035957788,0.000002839849,0.0000023989064,0.0000092988375,0.0072456417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854666,0.000067533,0.00028481588,0.00013383379,0.00038767114,0.0005794931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983752,0.000013632904,0.00008038757,0.000101400336,0.00015726394,0.0012721086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001035526,0.00010192292,0.00013652419,0.00047730166,0.0010511639,0.00013021378,0.00025744838,0.000045528694,0.0016505845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043922762,0.00009606025,0.00006449513,0.00033856733,0.00008366793,0.0002948318,0.000014430972,0.0001116227,0.0000408313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012080334,0.0000049643395,0.015673105,0.00006488891,0.00013560863,0.0022321155,0.04171412,0.00007353169,0.0000025586226,0.07041805,0.8635069,0.006162037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093260314,0.00003108433,0.014304284,0.000090762456,0.000035691603,0.0000038617304,0.0078431405,0.00001070312,8.0736817e-7,0.003431401,0.97402346,0.00013156123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55886286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.973344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41448116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035163198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062523986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393952193","doi":"10.26034/la.cfs.2024.4442","title":"La responsabilisation des auteurs de violence conjugale","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie Forensique et Sécurité","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17103584021702736,"score_gpt":0.4194079442039518,"score_spread":0.24837210398692441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393952193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8614497,0.06203845,0.0018620677,0.04547645,0.0038156882,0.00037598365,0.00003435439,0.0007107019,0.02423656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959974,0.027566569,0.002435884,0.00079219294,0.0004170312,0.000053369597,0.000009484568,0.000043221986,0.008708254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592894,0.001639443,0.00040988353,0.00068229943,0.00038120605,0.00095825206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601775,0.0030770064,0.000083162326,0.00038394227,0.00018401298,0.00025413567],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002851146,0.00033679028,0.0003120765,0.00013895021,0.00044367145,0.00040198935,0.0005291717,0.0006441744,0.00051742117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026938082,0.00034691126,0.00023274342,0.0005091337,0.0049985717,0.0009895157,0.00016955353,0.00085103174,0.00063622795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052848867,0.00006442883,0.0008393064,0.0005761354,0.000026249303,0.0003672237,0.015129292,0.000041649982,0.0003402414,0.63469476,0.009957472,0.33791038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012568146,0.00029946613,0.006591533,0.0036872427,0.000219486,0.00022873982,0.00814883,0.00054755853,0.002994246,0.45359617,0.5230302,0.00053085486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046885046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025146757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5130727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049981556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011805716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394701392","doi":"10.25071/9v6azb17","title":"How Canada’s highest court has given security certificates a red light","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada Watch","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03355916607115146,"score_gpt":0.24777549978702318,"score_spread":0.21421633371587173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394701392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033016866,0.0002582865,0.0000022521763,0.9860666,0.0005519677,0.00013555847,0.000023069997,0.00003573641,0.0096248435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102813,0.000031992717,0.000019572182,0.0015339878,0.0003147033,0.0000044965395,0.000008283296,0.0000068336935,0.0070520067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827194,0.0000807477,0.00014744073,0.00027803326,0.00069866265,0.0005231972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999083,0.00008079235,0.00006719128,0.00024210049,0.00014908686,0.00037782665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020522415,0.00013490657,0.00018648567,0.000012140689,0.0007751634,0.00021043983,0.00041791683,0.00007048668,0.000107324384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020007008,0.0001293432,0.00003471135,0.00017657535,0.00010459135,0.00016525625,0.000017731556,0.0001524615,0.0000023090502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007270208,0.00000956854,0.00045304885,0.000006261867,0.0000052589853,0.00009744891,0.0010493599,0.000001091836,0.0001727774,0.000093260154,0.997537,0.00056761014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059932285,0.000016667662,0.0023219353,0.00001982947,0.000015434467,0.0000021232286,0.0019248511,0.0000065181293,0.0010344145,0.0008605826,0.99354786,0.00018982921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99959874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98772645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010132061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004265623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75670326},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4394725099","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae006","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Kingdom; Public administration","score_opus":0.12789518429323685,"score_gpt":0.3925559634415649,"score_spread":0.2646607791483281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394725099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822678,0.00048524747,4.6587428e-7,0.01602349,0.00003339018,0.0002778398,0.00001596912,0.000001945975,0.00089385075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669856,0.0010216882,0.0000017771222,0.0022372215,0.000020445299,0.000008687452,0.0000028426357,0.00000381759,0.000004959737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022216,0.008607638,0.00039837207,0.000082544844,0.00047514267,0.00021416004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994133,0.00493403,0.00049613585,0.00020392225,0.00018549294,0.00004740851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040942254,0.000120650904,0.00042146497,0.00008048419,0.00055472524,0.000044192107,0.00067614915,0.000016881466,0.0000061917904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023565425,0.000056688412,0.000036647987,0.0016609585,0.002233602,0.00008405575,0.000090125344,0.0006877468,3.1574453e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002052039,0.00014495585,0.006033475,0.00004185381,0.00005405512,0.000050740444,0.08824352,0.0005817657,0.00007971017,0.90182954,0.00047489954,0.00041343697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088572624,0.0012933195,0.22096369,0.00571338,0.00013701405,0.000056208573,0.62384534,0.00018398535,0.0006327963,0.07249412,0.07344628,0.0003481441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87183875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9429221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82933545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009969376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055195595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394730524","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4752500","title":"Ontario Evidence Act Handbook with Common Objections &amp;amp; Evidentiary Foundations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.055767952584011335,"score_gpt":0.36135746298171856,"score_spread":0.3055895103977072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394730524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67508185,0.100915015,0.120629236,0.047485802,0.004331208,0.0012597298,0.0000070402043,0.0007592751,0.049530815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091847,0.01035329,0.0002880133,0.00010034095,0.0006824309,0.000017936389,0.0000042220604,0.000021018031,0.07934805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967422,0.00024392735,0.00029234437,0.0002982767,0.00067916693,0.0017440845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988902,0.00044092583,0.00009594232,0.00022786023,0.00015881252,0.00018625011],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027041323,0.00017408386,0.00018201194,0.00017027107,0.0020010741,0.00093104906,0.0004343054,0.00008879613,0.0010682198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019741985,0.00014672318,0.00016824326,0.0004805718,0.00027698794,0.0017843938,0.0000406916,0.0021361618,0.00077601743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041839975,0.00030450278,0.048579812,0.00011273276,0.0011306294,0.00009473672,0.06021214,0.00022331355,0.0008329257,0.7664463,0.030072352,0.09157217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014140907,0.00020917725,0.0016559941,0.0012762973,0.00032825946,0.000835911,0.0044177943,0.000008222936,0.0000115961475,0.12237141,0.8683783,0.00036562094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112723306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98274076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87001747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004070356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014491168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394909283","doi":"10.4337/9781802206678.00024","title":"Deferred prosecutions and justice: a whodunnit?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05578548030368578,"score_gpt":0.31534922111750896,"score_spread":0.25956374081382316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394909283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062457715,0.0021958938,0.000030296658,0.0061119767,0.002454731,0.00044655573,0.00006462175,0.00045456336,0.9881789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017577402,0.00020411791,0.0002768584,0.00043735292,0.0027373678,0.000033833054,0.000030753665,0.000083196974,0.9786191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975237,0.00004899774,0.0003705131,0.00068808993,0.00083298446,0.00053568836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998555,0.0002850714,0.00015491832,0.00037095856,0.000261674,0.00037238083],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001242233,0.00035396998,0.00037422337,0.0002669779,0.0010199028,0.004783014,0.00057153206,0.0006764535,0.00026089343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071055896,0.0003561816,0.00018341321,0.0000478352,0.00066036166,0.00086517335,0.0003287694,0.0011718821,0.0002812352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008611944,0.0000037800528,0.0000020866282,0.00021084398,0.00004751044,0.000053802003,0.006686775,2.2328791e-7,0.0000044761973,0.8811175,0.103269145,0.008595205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058947095,0.000025303198,0.0000053022495,0.00060565205,0.0003673845,0.000012266086,0.00085311156,0.0000048329402,0.0000021042079,0.1692787,0.8284378,0.0003485686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012900354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042798505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7251687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022907014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006560307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394914617","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.8294","title":"Safety in Numbers or Lost in the Crowd? Litigation of Mass Claims and Access to Justice in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.11137195080881866,"score_gpt":0.3938040363502775,"score_spread":0.2824320855414588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394914617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705441,0.000019423915,0.00003845042,0.006577346,0.00022574684,0.00070607313,0.00000968258,0.000013499172,0.021865705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795246,0.00006164043,0.00017720634,0.0006847648,0.000090440604,0.00002881579,0.000002869706,0.000010249714,0.0009915291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981379,0.00020565279,0.0004698047,0.00030261083,0.0005136647,0.00037038486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853325,0.00093536545,0.00011487311,0.00021737261,0.00009287689,0.00010628759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016792517,0.00012353189,0.00026595508,0.00030513757,0.00009808041,0.00016533319,0.00091737724,0.00010624585,0.00019456362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008933777,0.00010545676,0.000029046569,0.0015342537,0.00015553563,0.0008464045,0.00021534186,0.00024168225,0.00003584549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030364105,0.00038522884,0.62295353,0.0021732955,0.000030720785,0.00025998463,0.32806608,0.010701856,0.0013475145,0.015661988,0.008354316,0.0070290538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046395225,0.00009215995,0.9641362,0.0006688588,0.00009955357,9.073172e-7,0.025982862,0.000074792064,0.0003037551,0.0008465628,0.0071162754,0.00021412202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23010257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79643005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5663275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021547024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038786352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77502424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031020","doi":"10.29173/alr2735","title":"Remedying Unreasonable Delay","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07072834924317896,"score_gpt":0.37511198147496916,"score_spread":0.3043836322317902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020493148,0.05881004,0.000005178357,0.05509419,0.0004426656,0.00049964583,0.0000011542751,0.0001781984,0.8829196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45226154,0.42942148,0.00018890048,0.017468253,0.00060106243,0.00014513603,0.000026399255,0.00004257446,0.09984467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876803,0.00015720661,0.00019200168,0.0002047884,0.0003022981,0.0003756546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898255,0.0005360527,0.000053158572,0.00023672867,0.000057164158,0.00013434935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011443082,0.00008563877,0.00020654127,0.000014313282,0.0005188373,0.0000490747,0.00029155164,0.000043014345,0.0009188259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000841836,0.00007533211,0.00010012732,0.0006056165,0.00013415003,0.0002470283,0.000056368197,0.00007821627,0.00441223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011799696,0.000007630387,0.00015849438,0.0005877831,0.000007806888,0.000015657466,0.00054258725,5.1802436e-7,0.0000057237717,0.8778653,0.10910068,0.011706601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002350236,0.0000066215407,0.00003134252,0.0020398605,0.000039411887,0.0000027184128,0.00007594334,0.0000034410564,0.000005672583,0.001040957,0.99662477,0.000105762054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07128052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061248466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88752407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003878596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073967116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031095","doi":"10.29173/alr2741","title":"Uncertainty Over the Scope of Borrower Protections in Mortgage Enforcement Proceedings in Alberta: The Problems and Potential Solutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Mortgage underwriting; Finance; Economics; Law; Mortgage insurance; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04525285719647719,"score_gpt":0.3206136954996343,"score_spread":0.2753608383031571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2549205,0.06606729,0.000014527737,0.23026411,0.00075891113,0.019395571,0.000014745011,0.00009547979,0.42846885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641871,0.03274984,0.0000039699403,0.00051145226,0.00003900211,0.0005345023,0.0000024515077,0.000007930188,0.0019637642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986042,0.0001344624,0.00038487886,0.00021867652,0.0003015866,0.00035622672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927765,0.00032337004,0.000120732184,0.00016708332,0.00006386338,0.000047281315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018005918,0.00011206087,0.00022427757,0.000035175508,0.000531753,0.000054787117,0.00029067704,0.00004920744,0.00018489722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005156615,0.00006614595,0.00007515108,0.00096531736,0.00044280227,0.0002473741,0.00012610358,0.00019655719,0.000025716608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010792235,0.000078129386,0.0010555572,0.0013914581,0.000022850512,0.0000024707053,0.010112627,0.00020262995,0.000060805785,0.9796436,0.005411791,0.0020072951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021417787,0.00005593682,0.0039227735,0.0049444665,0.00009676931,0.0000069742377,0.0010610899,0.00023694012,0.000009855974,0.0034166987,0.9858296,0.00020475136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.428263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49714252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060022074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008684815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57554424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031097","doi":"10.29173/alr2733","title":"Freedom of Expression: Values and Harms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.05570262532108206,"score_gpt":0.36446524926745744,"score_spread":0.3087626239463754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041069645,0.34056342,0.000008454341,0.066814885,0.000864487,0.0012097153,0.000008323532,0.00016036199,0.54930073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5826136,0.40124217,0.00019800139,0.0018012973,0.00022675883,0.000039182443,0.0000060584553,0.0000142436575,0.013858729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992256,0.00011372612,0.00017047512,0.00013714521,0.00020214294,0.00015089524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992086,0.00045479965,0.000060443068,0.00015919894,0.000039635845,0.00007729405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057301926,0.000059346432,0.00020453177,0.000010276796,0.00018091426,0.00001723532,0.00016465232,0.00003082046,0.00037542538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041744756,0.000045719255,0.000054883803,0.00021557783,0.0002796484,0.00015307964,0.00006294056,0.000040267856,0.00016669152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005652742,0.000028357937,0.0010338547,0.0037448108,0.000016499556,0.000007797717,0.004798237,5.697567e-7,0.00034072902,0.7892223,0.18492289,0.015878279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034704564,0.000013630451,0.00018729859,0.003620952,0.00003620412,8.952869e-7,0.0001635481,0.0000017616879,0.00010065861,0.0023683517,0.993399,0.00007299703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017907742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041834116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8084761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005645744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024006848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031192","doi":"10.29173/alr2745","title":"The Lost Art of the Plea Inquiry: Learning From the Past to Prevent Wrongful Convictions in the Future","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.04786598903364865,"score_gpt":0.34312357015872513,"score_spread":0.2952575811250765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031192","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030518703,0.041454725,0.0000029464402,0.8840197,0.0012880848,0.0020820396,0.0000071496443,0.000023997585,0.04060271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88641787,0.088218786,0.0000049600267,0.01363016,0.001312863,0.00021942763,0.000011098638,0.000018616858,0.010166202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977071,0.0011619334,0.00028579312,0.00017581838,0.00040637676,0.00026296874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643135,0.002855597,0.00012294941,0.00050152245,0.000047880283,0.000040679086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019477581,0.00010228921,0.0001817474,0.000006342801,0.0011630462,0.000084207,0.00103467,0.000042309654,0.0001849268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072730926,0.000040845876,0.0001491298,0.0007894531,0.0003701888,0.000087212735,0.00014922208,0.0002890147,0.00066452887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000978107,0.000058930396,0.0052983277,0.00020144285,0.000047072528,0.0000020783466,0.051969234,0.00004460082,0.000009707624,0.57205063,0.35773572,0.012572431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022811213,0.000013925392,0.005557977,0.00097282935,0.00005957825,7.4502924e-7,0.0073117167,0.0000023025525,0.0000016224793,0.00050014415,0.9854974,0.00005891496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018688487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28265905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87038946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030051095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006563076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98784614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395058869","doi":"10.29173/alr2738","title":"Equitable Crime and Constructive Punishment: Deemed and Actual Agency Gains in Canadian Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Agency (philosophy); Constructive; Law; Criminology; Constructive trust; Criminal law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.058821821623517324,"score_gpt":0.3603355605315148,"score_spread":0.30151373890799743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395058869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07918549,0.061206438,3.7392587e-7,0.020411488,0.0002406608,0.001106096,0.000020455911,0.000040094343,0.8377889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94089454,0.0547945,0.000021554224,0.002975783,0.000030452913,0.000030970466,0.000008070247,0.000007831842,0.0012362835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986511,0.00015739954,0.00019792191,0.00025228556,0.00015630818,0.00058502384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904,0.00039428275,0.00004128939,0.00013360716,0.00003580864,0.00035498175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008260716,0.00010949934,0.00026106052,0.000035224068,0.00047888944,0.00007467544,0.00014366483,0.000058816746,0.00025974077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003692532,0.00010358725,0.000030052342,0.00033357248,0.00049923523,0.00032379813,0.00006928227,0.000093935014,0.00009996038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012972539,0.0000040378413,0.0009629554,0.00030009777,0.0000069479606,0.000019141347,0.002282729,2.9647486e-8,0.0000046540536,0.99137044,0.0012411661,0.003806522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009374742,0.000019858377,0.001326304,0.0012022216,0.000048247366,0.0000066703165,0.00056342693,0.0000030047188,0.00000607893,0.0050074356,0.99155504,0.00016794637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96840554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99200004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009038971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022549256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42241654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059436","doi":"10.29173/alr2687","title":"Reflections on COVID-19 And Criminal Law: How Does Judicial Doctrine Function in A Crisis?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Political science; Criminal law; Function (biology); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Economics; Medicine; Virology; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.09382345835857536,"score_gpt":0.41422065767767263,"score_spread":0.32039719931909727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059436","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01302479,0.04282184,0.000033326953,0.61881906,0.0017654777,0.0020402223,0.000021774069,0.00013297758,0.3213405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93659836,0.016206112,0.000018541996,0.04530962,0.00020709608,0.00014318721,0.000009180546,0.0000097658485,0.0014981399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981909,0.00056909025,0.00022174764,0.0003530466,0.00038398386,0.0002812499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900365,0.0004860182,0.000094831725,0.00019791724,0.00003220699,0.00018537987],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010644083,0.00012508681,0.00027483096,0.00004767264,0.0014564274,0.00007597979,0.00018115454,0.00003837546,0.0010183263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005103469,0.000104660816,0.00008342177,0.0004270337,0.0001889314,0.00029569832,0.00008710606,0.00025165922,0.000025631389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004875828,0.00006186163,0.00005762953,0.00045106333,0.000007192557,0.000010910827,0.0015734042,0.0000029304715,0.000007086886,0.98605967,0.010627112,0.0010923923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001390993,0.00017071383,0.000057529647,0.0002124525,0.00012433596,0.000010143432,0.0015224614,7.5527913e-7,0.000001969518,0.006828058,0.9907899,0.0001426036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24271598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48170915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98016274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002504485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001374838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059440","doi":"10.29173/alr2692","title":"The Dawn of Vavilov, The Twilight of Doré: Remedial Paths in Judicial Review of Rights-Affecting Administrative Decisions and The Unification of Canadian Public Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Remedial education; Twilight; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Judicial review; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07461095937881579,"score_gpt":0.350044930785816,"score_spread":0.2754339714070002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01842955,0.58166903,0.0000023414264,0.1963622,0.00045946726,0.0047054742,0.000059325277,0.0000058835535,0.19830675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84119034,0.1579445,0.000008954035,0.00071724155,0.000025345435,0.00006152858,0.0000047965937,0.0000037747154,0.000043507138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647945,0.0018406458,0.0008059814,0.00016516284,0.0005089751,0.00019979468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279004,0.0058108936,0.0006506151,0.00042340433,0.00025094015,0.00007408484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006391539,0.00009616015,0.0004848022,0.000035357458,0.000869571,0.000015539788,0.00066833926,0.000030048941,0.00012502458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037794479,0.000048828373,0.00014457418,0.001049646,0.0016163696,0.00011612527,0.00009023452,0.00018448324,9.89754e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013077211,0.00002230187,0.000075140044,0.0006240668,0.000014426491,4.834428e-7,0.00219916,8.786675e-8,0.0000073862984,0.9929817,0.0008321772,0.0032300504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015805567,0.00008122541,0.00023583583,0.008851759,0.00018218021,0.0000036700942,0.0011704514,0.0000017390597,0.00006595564,0.006455938,0.982712,0.00008123972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66835636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97490263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9865257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005104657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056027866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6688125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395078647","doi":"10.1163/9789004535091_039","title":"Montreal Universal Declaration on the Independence of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Independence (probability theory); Economic Justice; Political science; Declaration of independence; Law; Mathematics; Statistics; Politics","score_opus":0.07025357894546123,"score_gpt":0.3069955011116634,"score_spread":0.23674192216620216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395078647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008044658,0.00017061699,0.00004391726,0.004361493,0.00033144507,0.00014040423,0.0000085968595,0.00003416846,0.99482894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1890379,0.00036933977,0.000013567306,0.00014005894,0.00021747447,0.0000010297138,0.0000017699645,0.000008009137,0.8102108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899113,0.000021944414,0.00012776385,0.00017922859,0.0005709745,0.00010898617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992333,0.0003887569,0.000073509946,0.00015750561,0.00010441979,0.000042487914],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037439598,0.00010306856,0.00011268006,0.000044800072,0.0001950437,0.000046645826,0.00027386317,0.00020986958,0.0014555072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000662182,0.00006957019,0.000078833604,0.000030503397,0.00026110047,0.00008396463,0.000041949188,0.00027292478,0.00042026505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012961709,0.00000299526,4.968478e-7,0.000021327362,0.000011853219,0.000011446425,0.0015563115,0.0000046776995,0.0000033836557,0.98782825,0.009244227,0.0013020852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034863908,0.000089418565,0.000018914488,0.00037123726,0.00036581067,0.0000011700411,0.0042529074,0.000044780038,0.0000347689,0.23573971,0.7588554,0.00019101896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006542986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024123859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75208855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008269901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020561775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395095264","doi":"10.5040/9781509970483.ch-010","title":"A Field Trip into Québec Law: Exploring the Theoretical Ramifications of Sentience Recognition","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentience; Field (mathematics); Law; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08637490120057668,"score_gpt":0.34898034250987725,"score_spread":0.2626054413093006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395095264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009682184,0.00058094977,0.0006472541,0.014063521,0.00054417684,0.00019118952,0.0000042388756,0.00011219833,0.98375964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2856796,0.00090390624,0.0004341192,0.00042243974,0.0005646004,0.00011180834,0.0000032908667,0.00007139134,0.7118088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991783,0.00009915026,0.00014962521,0.00018566468,0.00025676022,0.000130531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993001,0.00036506046,0.00005491967,0.00019794793,0.000038328966,0.00004359119],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003990742,0.00008223983,0.00011421163,0.00004819,0.0001407434,0.00006132194,0.00027950003,0.000093956274,0.0065551577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000319004,0.000054393277,0.00008382612,0.00016864449,0.0008107596,0.00006506286,0.00004157852,0.00015281604,0.0005874369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003770129,0.00001157108,0.0000018884534,0.00004824447,0.000009621349,8.605186e-7,0.0051281457,1.5958483e-8,0.0000062908994,0.80810696,0.17476286,0.0119197965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016163543,0.00002280723,0.0000011941742,0.00030166432,0.000059210448,4.1682966e-7,0.006523266,0.000004274977,0.00011706309,0.059913155,0.93294895,0.00009184848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28269452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25963062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7581861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032983884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014623835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395461938","doi":"10.1515/9782763731483-007","title":"L’obligation de faire adopter la version française des textes constitutionnels canadiens","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Humanities; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.0503902051621805,"score_gpt":0.2977136727258381,"score_spread":0.24732346756365758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395461938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0154994875,0.00094423693,0.0006897,0.0040100627,0.0007377261,0.00025029064,0.00005736937,0.00006468323,0.9777464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71567255,0.0010390251,0.000651446,0.00017906209,0.00032611424,0.000004750664,0.000013503773,0.000014377957,0.2820992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982364,0.00009250906,0.0002885468,0.00043333054,0.00041316717,0.00053602405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834675,0.0003625875,0.00023901505,0.00034619178,0.0002825951,0.0004228462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070583395,0.0003284352,0.00031630386,0.0000867389,0.003017944,0.00024851007,0.00048647696,0.00058267725,0.0054321876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034182123,0.00032201526,0.00021593075,0.000029218798,0.006320268,0.00076539174,0.00009388067,0.0003247114,0.001238855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016294538,0.000015163869,0.0016878353,0.00007842455,0.000029238643,0.00008420407,0.004828281,0.000018989384,0.000030027462,0.95941806,0.0024562024,0.031337306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016133652,0.00006166738,0.0019858726,0.0012335596,0.00020556875,0.000033699842,0.0010822715,0.00006017243,0.00006978333,0.042290278,0.95235664,0.00045918243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1797105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27646714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044761863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007881595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395473776","doi":"10.1515/9782763731483-011","title":"Rapport définitif du comité de rédaction constitutionnelle française chargé, en 1984, d’établir un projet de version française officielle de certains textes constitutionnels à l’intention du ministre de la Justice du Canada","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.02160101134844848,"score_gpt":0.25937976487646236,"score_spread":0.23777875352801386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395473776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106786735,0.001260004,0.02345595,0.02125646,0.0034576585,0.0016369274,0.00067281653,0.00031443159,0.84115905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526088,0.0042867637,0.0010346659,0.0008822979,0.0013656341,0.000060618146,0.00018736589,0.000055782082,0.039518066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951565,0.0007698164,0.000896676,0.0009574987,0.0008992704,0.001320213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481636,0.0021783873,0.0008091146,0.0006018345,0.00069813227,0.00089614006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003225915,0.0008369516,0.0008148852,0.00020518164,0.0064149094,0.00037525376,0.0009795747,0.0012888814,0.0046920083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002367065,0.000897722,0.00044839137,0.00013453914,0.005049729,0.00071970565,0.00022088528,0.0010566121,0.00021708287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046200407,0.000495456,0.020622127,0.00069146015,0.00026221265,0.0015871956,0.009855806,0.0008918661,0.0005815544,0.90470093,0.0571687,0.0026806903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015051685,0.00016534963,0.0023337568,0.00123421,0.0017297793,0.0011416696,0.01275295,0.005081421,0.0005981903,0.002107609,0.9700822,0.001267642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78468156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52962697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91291356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023239718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01595073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395661108","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4808628","title":"Local Reform or Legal Transplant: Ontario’s Amended Certification Test","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Test (biology); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02970750760028566,"score_gpt":0.3072226517016559,"score_spread":0.27751514410137024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395661108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47120515,0.017743358,0.089753784,0.15846993,0.005540932,0.0011875998,0.00003245799,0.0010992469,0.25496754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608092,0.0027805748,0.000025091422,0.00006537116,0.0004062856,0.0000052780347,0.000003226819,0.000012416354,0.035892565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747777,0.00006137405,0.00024691198,0.000205902,0.00043595437,0.0015720621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995725,0.00009945018,0.00004636516,0.00009672896,0.000055901564,0.00012905936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018108825,0.00011401665,0.00011836073,0.00007706338,0.000635041,0.00030597634,0.00029902853,0.00009072091,0.00040667577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040948617,0.000084368825,0.00010319518,0.00023306243,0.00015476094,0.0006227906,0.0000084078765,0.0014641158,0.00014850406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016166623,0.00006737085,0.00021880737,0.000018133738,0.00006349282,0.00007994435,0.009404237,0.000007967451,0.00037457282,0.92514664,0.00054041855,0.06391677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030065578,0.00072662,0.0005053751,0.00025097214,0.00017396735,0.001316798,0.028965842,0.0001541461,0.00042611474,0.12711102,0.83965516,0.0004133076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09657646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9018323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063844128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009341168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396501616","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4809755","title":"Truth and Reconciliation: why Canada should repeal s. 43 of the Criminal Code","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.034343851111677676,"score_gpt":0.3046922529303892,"score_spread":0.27034840181871156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396501616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.872231,0.024308907,0.00053173956,0.081757,0.0029466506,0.00021093556,0.000019301051,0.000041851676,0.017952584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453956,0.0026316743,0.000010554976,0.00024198189,0.0003933707,0.0000011994973,2.9620432e-7,0.0000060842594,0.0021752794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826723,0.00013698188,0.00019804806,0.0001330592,0.00046460205,0.00080010487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949884,0.00016935282,0.00007210233,0.00008838492,0.00009875471,0.000072545714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898846,0.000071424955,0.000100361474,0.000024769333,0.0004548721,0.000084317755,0.0002360575,0.00004511863,0.000064662316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030804783,0.00005050916,0.000052975927,0.00020039806,0.00014577451,0.00017419415,0.000024166491,0.00080624793,0.0000010997891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003543318,0.000010339622,0.0014825907,0.000040918465,0.000064822336,0.000011613785,0.004268922,0.000010428463,0.00007743466,0.9485039,0.010079794,0.035413776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032791763,0.00030214826,0.0031211977,0.00035195547,0.00034971852,0.0006931338,0.07354596,0.0001889115,0.00035443256,0.2816454,0.6387309,0.0003883498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34367743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66685855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081778184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012674927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396542125","doi":"10.1515/9782760636002","title":"La détention avant jugement au Canada","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018755042048181805,"score_gpt":0.2240351820072148,"score_spread":0.205280139959033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396542125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01579423,0.005071832,0.00026287587,0.0015683827,0.00114073,0.00039357477,0.00013398477,0.00007683253,0.97555757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.314845,0.001092073,0.00028007315,0.00024707709,0.0006670886,0.000011985799,0.00006828117,0.000050113566,0.6827383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965458,0.0006388704,0.00033155098,0.0005454301,0.0009854698,0.0009528903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979867,0.00035446038,0.00034738556,0.00039319997,0.000241648,0.0006766263],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068202295,0.00046053008,0.00046752446,0.0000769017,0.001278404,0.000093880146,0.00089438463,0.0006076555,0.0009482871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000906571,0.00052694435,0.00023024181,0.00004455114,0.00071073347,0.00014936182,0.00059857225,0.0006210335,0.00010620588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032601896,0.000071006325,0.0017391389,0.0005482405,0.0003190869,0.0030056068,0.016200276,0.0005951706,0.00012963364,0.056299437,0.76056945,0.16019693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038683054,0.00009260287,0.0019031852,0.0005346923,0.0006136939,0.00006332139,0.004249297,0.00014281191,0.000071077906,0.0019349427,0.98946923,0.0005383249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98853123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99826473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29905075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01602891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071398793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686519","doi":"10.29173/mlj1117","title":"The Problematically Low Threshold of Evidence in Canadian Extradition Law: An Inquiry into its Origins; and Repercussions in the Case of Hassan Diab","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14763968215421863,"score_gpt":0.36994081375479765,"score_spread":0.22230113160057902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206644,0.00032674562,0.0000031365382,0.004944961,0.00018793021,0.00032250612,0.000001814645,0.0000029662071,0.0021435225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993814,0.00024384235,0.00006784351,0.00017450619,0.00011384665,0.000007957945,3.4747984e-7,0.0000051190054,0.000005123761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982695,0.0005026208,0.0004155118,0.00013549054,0.00033302902,0.00034384357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880564,0.00053721544,0.00014291146,0.00020721515,0.00011739824,0.00018964321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045924396,0.00008502238,0.00016044352,0.000067586596,0.000803769,0.0001857732,0.00039660186,0.00007157314,0.000033982647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028265768,0.00004642958,0.000037125657,0.00021659161,0.00051755,0.00078879384,0.000026309091,0.000337131,0.000003510409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037118105,0.000082361206,0.0127959335,0.00011047467,0.000006460435,0.00052909914,0.04238189,0.000057674555,0.0004936781,0.9391249,0.00010437245,0.0042760735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009992449,0.0012287017,0.048870083,0.0061214045,0.00010839714,0.0025239575,0.711856,0.0015104056,0.00050440535,0.21527791,0.010320101,0.00067939644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84840626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021437644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003125385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61820227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686663","doi":"10.29173/mlj1251","title":"Chapter 13 – The Dangers of Charter-Proofing the Toronto 18’s Prosecution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.057905607585483715,"score_gpt":0.31239602280322304,"score_spread":0.2544904152177393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6692408,0.004333924,0.00027218604,0.0400096,0.0027789306,0.0003782207,0.000004890033,0.00003670736,0.28294477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808383,0.00026989574,0.000042734995,0.0004444723,0.0009845989,0.0000040988994,3.7102595e-7,0.0000054644,0.00016456068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988498,0.00019337091,0.00019053965,0.000097350676,0.00044549914,0.00022343486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935293,0.000104804196,0.00012960163,0.0001591367,0.00019226641,0.000061230014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001083233,0.00006883923,0.0000915149,0.000005630367,0.0016412933,0.00022289481,0.000317589,0.00003806616,0.00065017573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008061154,0.00003955875,0.00009968058,0.000054470194,0.0003173233,0.00034247697,0.000049790862,0.00018279758,0.000015451114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047516485,0.000072295916,0.0016278169,0.00002694639,0.00007269209,0.000083755935,0.043005116,0.000012644644,0.004040942,0.86050636,0.0043284125,0.08617548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492483,0.000080506536,0.006495203,0.00018506449,0.00010641047,0.00022054126,0.37370732,0.000030964915,0.0030453068,0.012242707,0.60341996,0.00021674093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043950815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62243456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8482637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000622468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686678","doi":"10.29173/mlj1245","title":"Chapter 7 – Curing Complexity: Moving Forward from the Toronto 18 on Intelligence-to-Evidence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Warrant; Law; Intelligence analysis; Government (linguistics); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.2013073444227001,"score_gpt":0.369750869727238,"score_spread":0.16844352530453788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67167705,0.0073640374,0.010696614,0.09275397,0.006425257,0.00060650817,0.000022979651,0.0001802174,0.21027336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922709,0.00073216646,0.0010588866,0.0036166504,0.002192378,0.0000042570778,6.313643e-7,0.000013298904,0.00011084126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979399,0.00025102118,0.00030292865,0.00027598097,0.0007860135,0.0004441459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984113,0.0006830439,0.00011204778,0.000287463,0.0002247351,0.00028138614],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010191533,0.00014778787,0.00018281839,0.000013730028,0.0024388123,0.0008059838,0.000711431,0.000056752957,0.0027134172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051156804,0.00011380072,0.00014513885,0.00009826272,0.00025275516,0.00068141456,0.00019048732,0.00035477307,0.00027114555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088600595,0.00005915039,0.0020627137,0.000009156377,0.000052545856,0.00029891753,0.01329793,0.000101746184,0.00024432957,0.82515264,0.0023154803,0.15631682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011039776,0.0001985038,0.005816795,0.0016783369,0.000102796665,0.00009977964,0.2547511,0.00009082663,0.0025024093,0.10957759,0.6244874,0.0005840789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17757957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82725734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71557504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036307855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008629329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686707","doi":"10.29173/mlj1252","title":"Chapter 14 – Sentencing the Toronto 18: Lessons from Then, Lessons for Now","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Terrorism; Culpability; Harm; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sentencing guidelines; Sentence; Law; Criminology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.11957844813978605,"score_gpt":0.3684143606725446,"score_spread":0.24883591253275858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24392033,0.009892546,0.010600764,0.51021194,0.009368282,0.0007552529,0.00015032977,0.00016710165,0.21493348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940525,0.00076418766,0.0006680241,0.0014044851,0.0025357609,0.00000951298,0.0000028952543,0.000015933594,0.00054667325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850976,0.00016755903,0.00023174155,0.00021200598,0.0004544732,0.00042444872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987649,0.00041732233,0.0001264823,0.00021545631,0.00030873565,0.00016712424],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086489756,0.00012442897,0.00016865706,0.000008538251,0.0031184983,0.0005676937,0.00044147563,0.000073696836,0.0011219083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016896943,0.00009022702,0.00020519401,0.000046847596,0.000258277,0.00044911934,0.00008231861,0.00024062012,0.0000464144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005025018,0.000074647425,0.00042235787,0.000010000261,0.00010470904,0.00012823996,0.013290985,0.000012628585,0.0013014288,0.90548253,0.014185992,0.064936206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023921905,0.000028065626,0.0010155491,0.00010259464,0.000099973935,0.000058915677,0.23970294,0.00003063325,0.0005064569,0.030050103,0.7279811,0.00018443727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11123733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94027656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87543243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021663643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012540753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686732","doi":"10.29173/mlj1248","title":"Chapter 10 – Trial by Jury and the Toronto 18","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Jury trial; Political science; Commission; State (computer science); Terrorism; SWORD; Criminology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04234916095598757,"score_gpt":0.31460750203745547,"score_spread":0.2722583410814679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26533353,0.01057152,0.000054122404,0.031409014,0.002834581,0.00027806545,0.0000056127205,0.000035365654,0.68947816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348503,0.0013333153,0.000054246906,0.0008002483,0.0019548996,0.0000033985445,5.3152144e-7,0.0000062561007,0.0023620578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989516,0.00022108426,0.00016285558,0.000109464556,0.00034639772,0.00020860047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.00015999618,0.00006734689,0.000093505376,0.00009906502,0.0001235031],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010332877,0.00006826591,0.00012150635,0.00000386002,0.0014492287,0.00045134075,0.000174146,0.000046522593,0.0034060476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295145,0.0000460286,0.0000779527,0.000025661673,0.00039684115,0.0003280303,0.00005023513,0.00014740592,0.00003376183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004178677,0.00006614897,0.00004135312,0.000006001537,0.000048539674,0.00011729776,0.0047785016,2.2844236e-7,0.00011786202,0.85514987,0.06681835,0.06867717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004715404,0.000051764415,0.000031225638,0.000015384358,0.000035874345,0.00006587262,0.026932707,0.0000015390019,0.000050493873,0.0065690475,0.9614481,0.00008261545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03572358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46575138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8946297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006688137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004820603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396713418","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4818633","title":"Cisg Ratification in Hong Kong – a Closer Look at Conformity of Goods Under the Cisg: Third-Party Rights, Claims and Assertions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Conformity; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.021757651267767675,"score_gpt":0.32028410846032435,"score_spread":0.29852645719255666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396713418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770045,0.0062550227,0.0009108184,0.010737633,0.00023838758,0.00019231725,0.0000020261575,0.000025791722,0.0046334523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99380505,0.0031787367,0.000013524687,0.00004823716,0.00015911424,0.0000057734064,0.000001551711,0.0000062843874,0.0027817395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981606,0.00021168898,0.0003010528,0.00016372965,0.0003368738,0.00082606875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994085,0.00024290544,0.0000962106,0.00012468784,0.000063452695,0.000064286745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032518227,0.000094461895,0.00013005776,0.00007321076,0.00078222173,0.00015236596,0.00022347902,0.00008802004,0.00005714625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040760668,0.00006276942,0.00007752548,0.00028716138,0.000308845,0.0004724683,0.00003343132,0.0009638006,0.000016604235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021276364,0.000023681307,0.0029440888,0.000009908594,0.00003601776,0.0000019040988,0.0029148143,0.000015968633,0.0005523071,0.99068797,0.00034179425,0.0024503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025321834,0.00011090067,0.017792191,0.00012650275,0.000088548455,0.000110802794,0.019773215,0.0003803686,0.00043985434,0.9425438,0.018182801,0.00019780004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016716691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13020892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12853727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007282146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015110199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8856625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714839","doi":"10.29173/mlj1347","title":"Part B Drawing the Curtains in the House of Justice: Analyzing the Impact of Pandemic Measures within Manitoba Courts on the Open Court Principle, Access to Justice, and Charter Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Pandemic; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine","score_opus":0.1580360929708698,"score_gpt":0.418078896647061,"score_spread":0.2600428036761912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98606694,0.00011483793,0.000023521974,0.009700677,0.00040926045,0.00078240957,0.000010233581,0.000020074449,0.002872052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839014,0.00029786758,0.000007714282,0.00060718186,0.00063440856,0.000026357922,4.80358e-7,0.000016674225,0.000019195086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669224,0.0011374123,0.0005408741,0.00021611292,0.0009340775,0.00047925411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698585,0.0018327702,0.00042479267,0.00041972508,0.00022035954,0.00011652393],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009336641,0.00019553122,0.0002905908,0.00009064072,0.0033762215,0.0011844244,0.0024926648,0.00006958031,0.000029655686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059367385,0.00007794852,0.00013245123,0.0006059744,0.0005541355,0.00054010906,0.0003274193,0.0006566566,0.000010724419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001503603,0.000664054,0.19236144,0.00032671858,0.00094804476,0.00040266107,0.32373825,0.019257247,0.0008465071,0.3738908,0.0760361,0.010024586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010830981,0.00063520425,0.4445024,0.0016971892,0.0016940678,0.00018469524,0.48537022,0.0010399865,0.00026523383,0.02829838,0.034545347,0.0006841674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055509098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44337595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38786682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013243119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018303095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715350","doi":"10.29173/mlj1303","title":"Predictive Policing and the Charter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.023026530596553605,"score_gpt":0.2785940423774501,"score_spread":0.2555675117808965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84432644,0.000556629,0.000090701215,0.051082514,0.0012098758,0.00022995374,0.000005487342,0.00003550235,0.10246289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974067,0.00007347006,0.000014492723,0.0015260644,0.0008409434,0.0000081441995,1.3856102e-7,0.000003876019,0.00012614425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989181,0.00035846073,0.00010084723,0.00006926799,0.00036410458,0.00018919726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996403,0.00013582472,0.0000611672,0.00005585192,0.000033191263,0.00007369563],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013888944,0.000044222194,0.00007219514,0.000017654613,0.005015605,0.000185673,0.00020317928,0.000012121413,0.00027792825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003991986,0.000030402427,0.000041752577,0.00006565053,0.0004030761,0.00016577962,0.00009644786,0.00030676255,0.00000662829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019849098,0.000024290719,0.0021768752,0.000003309472,0.00003071876,0.00004755508,0.04643517,0.000032698263,0.00001927662,0.93224514,0.006499194,0.012287298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007911,0.00012057471,0.0038993845,0.000016423792,0.00005707393,0.00039134154,0.34482744,0.00009690987,0.000009708052,0.043523606,0.60614264,0.0001238254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06845492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09532196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009063409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003374544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715371","doi":"10.29173/mlj1297","title":"Blurred Lines: A Critical Examination of the Use of Police Officers and Police Employees as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Impartiality; Gatekeeping; Supreme court; Admissible evidence; Objectivity (philosophy); Law; Harm; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1987371124765167,"score_gpt":0.3971998836199393,"score_spread":0.1984627711434226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99612063,0.00022894505,0.00001503952,0.002134348,0.00041831174,0.00017567351,0.00001182375,0.0000078002395,0.0008874313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905854,0.00014945389,0.00015303778,0.00027454217,0.00032151837,0.0000110485435,4.995128e-7,0.000008724128,0.000022655486],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965725,0.001689498,0.00059859257,0.00014107529,0.00075246044,0.00024589282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744874,0.001801664,0.00029909294,0.00012741843,0.0002269106,0.00009616099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024206252,0.00010313104,0.00031444774,0.00011375481,0.0008575181,0.00012269939,0.00034388003,0.00004985625,0.00012925797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001942652,0.000081266546,0.00010830477,0.00031446974,0.0006707695,0.00047305002,0.00013969737,0.00026206125,6.5660566e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018946513,0.0021312747,0.014643578,0.0004458005,0.0001474258,0.00007057329,0.5340908,0.0006609472,0.01128765,0.3782135,0.003575952,0.052837808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010938783,0.0007181644,0.03143312,0.00039244522,0.00022672335,0.00024731376,0.91238356,0.00005244577,0.002158954,0.0020187586,0.048924297,0.00035037132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4073778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30093166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3782927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012941855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022432735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7118245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715374","doi":"10.29173/mlj1292","title":"The Devil’s Playground: A Case Study of Elgin-Middlesex Detention Centre (EMDC) Demonstrating the System Failings of the Ontario Corrections Regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Action (physics); Democracy; Prison reform; Political science; Plague (disease); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Public administration; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03835937613428785,"score_gpt":0.2671913196198138,"score_spread":0.22883194348552593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99280995,0.00011979705,0.00001972469,0.0009300758,0.0014388291,0.00037338585,0.0000026440957,0.0000144372025,0.0042911614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994036,0.0000055704854,0.00001746864,0.000028143568,0.00017962603,0.000014923313,1.6968731e-7,0.0000076026017,0.0003429219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970534,0.0011720941,0.000500415,0.00013664854,0.0008602764,0.00027720534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983259,0.0005210445,0.000618318,0.00025833122,0.00021396719,0.000062467894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026725791,0.00010416558,0.00015631525,0.000025688578,0.012632271,0.00024682214,0.00064296724,0.00003030097,0.000039038787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010948328,0.000058271373,0.00016805562,0.00028638224,0.0003137833,0.0001785739,0.00017007164,0.0006573026,0.0000014185512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038431844,0.0014836403,0.21475464,0.00013109577,0.00066048,0.0016914228,0.58215755,0.0040084235,0.0003478306,0.16043335,0.001909097,0.032038167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019077421,0.00013474117,0.0015335554,0.000069444635,0.00015321063,0.0019190888,0.98355633,0.00010993382,0.0000149067455,0.00017121222,0.012076001,0.000070796545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7569734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99279684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40139878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006900711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026858528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715375","doi":"10.29173/mlj1294","title":"Reconsidering Luxton in the Post-Nur Revolution: A Brief Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Recent Challenges to Mandatory Minimums and Other Sentencing Provisions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law; Proportionality (law); Phenomenon; Momentum (technical analysis); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2201731222614722,"score_gpt":0.3953958835768836,"score_spread":0.1752227613154114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977828,0.002222513,0.00003155956,0.017214803,0.000099391575,0.00020577821,0.000021505366,0.000005855941,0.002370538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795645,0.00088477466,0.0005291241,0.00055588625,0.00004406812,0.000014690802,6.44532e-7,0.0000051858297,0.000009173266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976175,0.0012989648,0.0002929841,0.00018257555,0.0004141147,0.00019390526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881786,0.0006996968,0.00016676202,0.0000937238,0.0001384764,0.000083453226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033124543,0.00008118361,0.00021200876,0.00019158416,0.0011309176,0.000072935145,0.00015693987,0.00002312221,0.000110483954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037231162,0.00006593427,0.000054590368,0.0004348013,0.00021274584,0.0001858752,0.00008925562,0.00023816178,5.3315364e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016964937,0.00009357627,0.0023187923,0.000028689401,0.00019279064,0.000044338656,0.9076735,0.00009846302,0.00016451065,0.07417475,0.00022383509,0.014817124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012327192,0.00023569468,0.008260259,0.000051977422,0.00012458328,0.000032146407,0.962322,0.00004420428,0.0000053643475,0.0016773565,0.027034437,0.00008871531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027174968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57175875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54458374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062803374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9793032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715377","doi":"10.29173/mlj1289","title":"Year in Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Supreme court; Skepticism; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Period (music); Sociology","score_opus":0.05163883475013758,"score_gpt":0.3343908235187593,"score_spread":0.28275198876862173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16182156,0.036686946,0.000020536289,0.07419076,0.003187673,0.00055288774,0.000007081434,0.00007595839,0.7234566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918349,0.004622857,0.00008035856,0.0028194033,0.0003895779,0.000009262565,4.601996e-7,0.0000054187744,0.0002377862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883354,0.0003073751,0.00015677839,0.00007308108,0.0004289227,0.00020031302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997336,0.00003999188,0.000057662215,0.0000666507,0.000027851665,0.000074235664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016931145,0.000039968152,0.00009227195,0.00002614092,0.00113068,0.00005716962,0.00028303917,0.0000116448855,0.0026448646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000686202,0.000039840488,0.00005172759,0.00017142494,0.00006375494,0.00014606596,0.00006320007,0.0003331843,0.00007730714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044890297,0.00018782563,0.010202072,0.00015894236,0.000013909996,0.00090154563,0.004745707,0.00003799591,0.0000242352,0.74775726,0.16908441,0.066841185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007127945,0.000026336133,0.0005336659,0.00012764148,0.000007383958,0.000055212175,0.02006133,5.5001203e-7,0.000001141222,0.004342831,0.97471327,0.0000593898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024760459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1874194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83001333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020412797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067213725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715380","doi":"10.29173/mlj1301","title":"11(e) Shattered: The Historic and Continued Breaching of Indigenous Persons Right to Reasonable and Timely Bail","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Charter; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021260275935667202,"score_gpt":0.2604292109257729,"score_spread":0.23916893499010572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817013,0.0019550887,0.000025284959,0.005127858,0.00032824493,0.00015786481,0.000009806098,0.000012245563,0.010682312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984007,0.000060451726,0.00012276034,0.00046590157,0.00022952467,0.0000060113616,4.2056809e-7,0.0000076029623,0.0007066502],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875855,0.00027791318,0.00016103317,0.00012944452,0.00041291388,0.0002601279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.00014628167,0.00012013097,0.000088576846,0.00004981079,0.00014494787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013962188,0.000077570156,0.00014002415,0.000042837833,0.0040925504,0.0001764966,0.00027602032,0.000023476685,0.00020097545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003968556,0.000061045335,0.000040688108,0.00011675646,0.00017985562,0.00022106228,0.00013259948,0.00027236142,0.000002385351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034916855,0.0003530078,0.050261114,0.0000999285,0.00017258644,0.0006009999,0.62186956,0.00008878963,0.0019613039,0.14730084,0.067542195,0.109400526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022154128,0.00016575721,0.0049440633,0.000035897694,0.00006565176,0.00044573843,0.13371873,0.000009870917,0.000026979065,0.002991885,0.8572173,0.00015659041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100059904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23029724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7896751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019535616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006895683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715927","doi":"10.29173/mlj1200","title":"Reclaiming Prima Facie Exclusionary Rules in Canada, Ireland, New Zealand ,and the United States: The Importance of Compensation, Proportionality, and Non-Repetition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Proportionality (law); Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.036697639324328464,"score_gpt":0.27024006849156507,"score_spread":0.2335424291672366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90825766,0.00023911297,0.00004099089,0.09084973,0.00006281833,0.00017088142,0.0000073071838,0.000003435588,0.0003680394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973594,0.0006602326,0.00007828418,0.001701254,0.00016440889,0.0000020328678,0.000008963847,0.000003803116,0.000021651938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988106,0.00019870946,0.00031740317,0.00010458068,0.00042304606,0.00014564929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992246,0.0002821488,0.00021769297,0.000058477166,0.000101920756,0.000115132665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092667365,0.00007113998,0.00013214741,0.00001741774,0.0009143113,0.00008727605,0.00015525981,0.000024846482,0.000040466864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001252677,0.00004241836,0.000021319149,0.00013132153,0.0003783525,0.00016106323,0.000060361523,0.00020844789,6.281936e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004716128,0.000027647182,0.88409543,0.00006903447,0.000040550593,0.000087051325,0.03126864,0.00046528582,0.000042936954,0.06962727,0.009408139,0.004396431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022262186,0.00009464751,0.6681825,0.00035007572,0.000086313354,0.0001569318,0.14019011,0.0016576551,0.000043502117,0.064747185,0.121965475,0.00029937964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9549821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2159129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011445108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004930249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7032236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396717253","doi":"10.29173/mlj1004","title":"Challenging Infanticide: Why Section 233 of Canadas Criminal Code is Unconstitutional","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Code (set theory); Criminal code; Political science; History; Law; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Operating system","score_opus":0.06206093319474116,"score_gpt":0.32946729573582184,"score_spread":0.2674063625410807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396717253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220637,0.0003792845,0.0037566049,0.00984349,0.004984352,0.00016940874,0.000024270905,0.000055059038,0.15872383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565536,0.00009197072,0.00033553236,0.000822321,0.0030321234,0.0000012652745,7.727984e-7,0.0000067387778,0.000053892592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984119,0.00011160685,0.00030442647,0.00014688096,0.0006736814,0.00035152168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989842,0.000078462115,0.00017506855,0.00010370413,0.00046991179,0.0001886583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008332023,0.000103849045,0.00015324277,0.00007770058,0.0020854005,0.00012531108,0.00025630373,0.000082454106,0.00079968246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114918184,0.00010101746,0.00008659863,0.00015147911,0.00095472555,0.000445955,0.000035579655,0.0002566134,0.000029125546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016511779,0.00013439592,0.009046333,0.00010016198,0.00011717665,0.00014181102,0.017458232,0.00005242515,0.0010903673,0.9166995,0.044200722,0.010793704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004229106,0.00028023726,0.004560315,0.000367466,0.00017043379,0.00050494034,0.072998144,0.0001098877,0.0023112367,0.012097876,0.90580606,0.00037046944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32228488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8836892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9046017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023566588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035540646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784722","doi":"10.7202/1111190ar","title":"Les délais injustifiés dans l’administration publique : la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada dans l’arrêt Law Society of Saskatchewan c Abrametz","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02260898432843,"score_gpt":0.31728082083192416,"score_spread":0.29467183650349416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09182888,0.2748637,0.0007337339,0.18535249,0.0024421278,0.0025350684,0.001331234,0.00019033976,0.44072244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568536,0.031634454,0.00093291904,0.0040024067,0.00024130433,0.00010810023,0.00005843955,0.000040300674,0.0061284653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386597,0.0029511452,0.00090808445,0.00053875556,0.0011209007,0.000615168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971654,0.0012962878,0.0005133959,0.0004890097,0.00020551328,0.0003303904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060728057,0.00034271824,0.0007029126,0.000013352702,0.001533746,0.000145321,0.00086388394,0.00022495983,0.0014564266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025822892,0.00036003417,0.00043341363,0.00070029136,0.0015386833,0.00045419534,0.00021954908,0.00068837864,0.0000063791445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011170803,0.00025771884,0.0009765578,0.0040886705,0.000059948426,0.000076656004,0.0075705694,0.000036222067,0.00023448547,0.88380325,0.09285832,0.0100264065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012492656,0.00013680334,0.0003184145,0.0016642023,0.000327723,0.00011504169,0.011345291,0.000046119574,0.00018215015,0.0013350612,0.98404694,0.00035731375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8911886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012440912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005264451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396791208","doi":"10.4324/9781003496236-6","title":"The Canadian Bill of Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.044417152827837876,"score_gpt":0.3051911268003689,"score_spread":0.26077397397253105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396791208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000020882112,0.000993,1.7585133e-7,0.012573295,0.0005447561,0.00008498637,0.000009690821,0.000016806405,0.9857752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048951793,0.00023235856,0.000007057732,0.00007179878,0.00022826262,0.0000010167524,9.587671e-7,0.0000060754023,0.95050067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993417,0.000006488361,0.000112480695,0.00011324222,0.0002651142,0.00016092285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995071,0.000121162935,0.00003066598,0.00013821638,0.00007207468,0.00013075782],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028674092,0.00007156698,0.000089687936,0.000042996497,0.00061805185,0.00008221386,0.0002614156,0.00014664265,0.0016430937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016116595,0.000034552046,0.00008089363,0.0000182474,0.00043146242,0.000027307166,0.000018533716,0.00013204168,0.0007242501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7228323e-7,2.1446797e-7,4.213088e-7,0.0000031911147,0.000008264397,0.000007443149,0.00046282425,2.5618592e-8,6.9058984e-8,0.94126594,0.057670407,0.0005807325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022702,0.0000037856619,7.421918e-7,0.000037432535,0.00001365266,1.9612983e-7,0.000049658564,2.0831925e-7,0.000001129887,0.41170886,0.5881448,0.000037253063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53047436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013494736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006135394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396958677","doi":"10.1515/9780776629261-011","title":"CHAPTER 9 A Human Rights-Based Approach to Data Protection in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Data Protection Act 1998; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.11958815203808106,"score_gpt":0.26093903945613955,"score_spread":0.1413508874180585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396958677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000722512,0.000015853979,0.00045842,0.00030548227,0.00006127932,0.0006547447,0.00012772258,0.000026680045,0.99827754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7272397,0.0000023623352,0.000620047,0.0001075161,0.00011845523,0.0000010594092,0.000058137433,0.000021955631,0.27183074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866706,0.000043926986,0.00015563561,0.00046961734,0.00047807666,0.00018569475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991274,0.00002603625,0.00015468661,0.00044216515,0.00007703125,0.00017270033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019051573,0.00016096818,0.0002788748,0.00008764509,0.00035994593,0.000017865077,0.0010103435,0.00014012615,0.00009752287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010772344,0.00019605819,0.00004951179,0.0000113677825,0.00019680898,0.00008664638,0.00024679909,0.00026629522,0.000004722966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005389096,0.000012374633,0.000007884685,0.00011637894,0.000027385444,0.00007164773,0.0019709966,0.00003254442,0.000012753499,0.99143136,0.0050583025,0.0012044961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016092787,0.000031799827,0.00001630772,0.00015110167,0.00004839132,2.965791e-7,0.0001913283,0.00012285136,0.000020859477,0.00077498227,0.9982562,0.00022494733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003722515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000593275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79950213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398133286","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4831917","title":"Data as Protected Investment in the Background of Einarsson v. Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05626605959258878,"score_gpt":0.34793295820745224,"score_spread":0.29166689861486345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398133286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421886,0.014131672,0.00008884655,0.030652238,0.00037560525,0.00032914983,0.000012860451,0.00001358619,0.012207411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968166,0.0018436682,0.000015043658,0.00022452285,0.0001939817,0.000004196928,0.0000036770182,0.0000051631087,0.0008931583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791515,0.0002676963,0.00018625698,0.00014078998,0.0005379358,0.0009521544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995355,0.0001359383,0.00005106159,0.00020006919,0.00003406132,0.000043350596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038685494,0.00006526748,0.000086390246,0.000040549254,0.00021032011,0.00010132071,0.0008259325,0.000032669708,0.000044916305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108059474,0.00004464954,0.000024114679,0.00034708204,0.00008489987,0.00027260208,0.000045770685,0.00093911705,0.0000065070403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016949534,0.000030248413,0.00013078692,0.000017112026,0.000035011584,0.000044237735,0.0019177917,0.0000043192917,0.00007847571,0.989009,0.0036414335,0.00507464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016959799,0.00027902683,0.0007411781,0.00022099649,0.00005684509,0.00022222845,0.13299657,0.00010476253,0.00003045489,0.3393851,0.52561635,0.00017689298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8339768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64962393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012165469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017949617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9876177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398763430","doi":"10.29173/mlj924","title":"The Restorative Justice Act: An Enhancement to Justice in Manitoba?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13681973693014327,"score_gpt":0.38382854104674136,"score_spread":0.2470088041165981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398763430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277455,0.00063132757,0.0008897321,0.026395962,0.0068142517,0.0006267665,0.0000033293068,0.00005919653,0.13683394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995016,0.0001598272,0.0006988669,0.0012743606,0.0025308623,0.0000169349,6.4291567e-7,0.000012737341,0.00028977924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735963,0.00058939046,0.0003503739,0.0002129563,0.0009020887,0.00058554515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983419,0.00029526596,0.0001425779,0.00022514418,0.00040399045,0.00059110444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034367254,0.00014350837,0.00015359353,0.00005501968,0.0024324586,0.00072446594,0.00073992426,0.000070014314,0.00003707215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076439074,0.00010861801,0.000043352575,0.00027929677,0.00024606552,0.0007960038,0.0000929379,0.00043561755,0.00027615234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012418558,0.00060104573,0.0017372597,0.00006153153,0.00005499217,0.00084133266,0.11886557,0.0005733979,0.00046382143,0.6885607,0.084674045,0.10232444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024998502,0.00031271062,0.00088605064,0.000069553986,0.00009441734,0.000028893306,0.4712447,0.000021147165,0.000111257534,0.0058710733,0.5209193,0.00019090048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05594379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8946538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000776607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029695197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398770012","doi":"10.29173/mlj916","title":"The First by the Court Decisions: The Emergence of a Practice of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.02609555368168191,"score_gpt":0.2896054080458155,"score_spread":0.2635098543641336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398770012","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33621043,0.005832633,0.0005689731,0.5420682,0.005350164,0.0010467203,0.00005463645,0.000014210937,0.10885404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981175,0.00076710666,0.00003440925,0.00073131133,0.00022771818,0.0000036407935,9.165909e-8,0.0000060662937,0.00011216032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708,0.00066281814,0.0004841227,0.000094873125,0.0013912612,0.00028691188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371415,0.004483006,0.0007029258,0.00042859255,0.0005999311,0.000071371665],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049501625,0.00009425723,0.00015406118,0.000007388557,0.0033807303,0.0000829228,0.0017326297,0.000040090086,0.00007677352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003918467,0.000038138493,0.00011681122,0.00021631253,0.0010353448,0.00018283665,0.00012830364,0.0003456627,0.0000016084327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016813212,0.00012644318,0.003632494,0.0000195881,0.00014452879,0.000004264944,0.009207514,0.00027513536,0.00024915766,0.23383428,0.7411174,0.011221044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086469816,0.000045499764,0.002040029,0.00009741993,0.00007916731,0.000033070388,0.08068513,0.000052020223,0.00033364497,0.003390114,0.91309744,0.00006000104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8087661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6619071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006386232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046898972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399041416","doi":"10.29173/mlj808","title":"Bill 25, the Manitoba Evidence Amendment Act (Scheduling of Criminal Organizations) Reviews: 4th Session, 39th Legislature","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Advertising","score_opus":0.0878629700160003,"score_gpt":0.3502726637624275,"score_spread":0.2624096937464272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399041416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85020703,0.07046086,0.0049482607,0.03833366,0.009488041,0.0021425216,0.00001574516,0.00019990838,0.024203993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98701715,0.0072569856,0.001611093,0.0008611936,0.0030676755,0.000009780122,0.0000016647307,0.00002426074,0.00015016264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652165,0.00083885924,0.00069915655,0.00022087131,0.0010244498,0.000695026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976087,0.00044242962,0.0006362233,0.00037094933,0.00059425464,0.00034739266],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040879194,0.00024289927,0.0003575751,0.00007080747,0.0028915193,0.00034423172,0.0009128738,0.0001349423,0.00068881334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013654679,0.000140264,0.00017701156,0.0005922071,0.00049963756,0.0016238717,0.00014949904,0.00069377787,0.0001429081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004292816,0.0018675294,0.14797813,0.0012442243,0.00043008666,0.00017369287,0.17835143,0.00038451073,0.0120109115,0.37741995,0.12096099,0.15874925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003121321,0.00019040958,0.009069491,0.002922613,0.00065115467,0.0003777416,0.21166638,0.000016414559,0.0016282242,0.0023816002,0.77015436,0.0006294875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023288708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057960466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64919335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031877472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022466718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060783","doi":"10.29173/mlj757","title":"Khosa - Still Searching for That Star","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Tribunal; Political science; Immigration; Legislature","score_opus":0.09696587295950729,"score_gpt":0.3625784842182593,"score_spread":0.265612611258752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8758959,0.00078673573,0.0031043289,0.0350406,0.0017254162,0.00053014094,0.0000138961395,0.00013394016,0.08276901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957332,0.00011659029,0.0016290402,0.00086817873,0.0014540866,0.000002883999,7.551453e-7,0.0000067264764,0.00018852256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868095,0.000115088485,0.00015005177,0.00012523265,0.00047611512,0.0004525549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993384,0.00015993987,0.00007934186,0.00008976406,0.0001089289,0.00022364245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013044102,0.000084964726,0.000118666554,0.000036379595,0.001727949,0.0004602492,0.00032653892,0.000051238418,0.00013187862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012550183,0.00007480862,0.00011050625,0.00006470639,0.00012467675,0.00051065144,0.000017310289,0.0002501183,0.000029740762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019965589,0.00014449787,0.0012863983,0.000025748108,0.000034398872,0.00016219338,0.0135734035,0.000034472763,0.00044126765,0.715344,0.022713946,0.24604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002713689,0.0002086075,0.0023430393,0.00007539586,0.000028330196,0.00004768886,0.033172294,0.000031767442,0.00021171113,0.09296978,0.8704582,0.00018185395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100876745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095585994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012809888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007509391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060925","doi":"10.29173/mlj728","title":"Conditional Sentences in Manitoba: A Prisoner in Your Own Home","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science; Criminology","score_opus":0.059374622234024364,"score_gpt":0.32431513232138276,"score_spread":0.2649405100873584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687009,0.0004214772,0.000039172977,0.011415321,0.00049904647,0.00014869781,0.000005194592,0.000026058824,0.018744139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691296,0.0002334826,0.00038883797,0.0006678446,0.0016542932,0.000009563025,0.0000024068054,0.000009602795,0.00012102658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786645,0.0002429107,0.00043658548,0.00020873686,0.00069302047,0.0005522952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993665,0.000119962366,0.00013774057,0.00009383952,0.000098991986,0.00018297223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012550498,0.0001389478,0.00020926703,0.00016293353,0.0006459864,0.00029025233,0.00039784095,0.000105524385,0.00053290004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008979334,0.00012768991,0.00008667357,0.0002719549,0.0003176974,0.00092970696,0.0000478387,0.0005257353,0.00022101057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026484797,0.0010658317,0.5430709,0.000045940975,0.000051477236,0.0019117208,0.019062664,0.0008776056,0.00031748466,0.3507341,0.013471852,0.06912553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015772978,0.00013328667,0.28953165,0.00035555346,0.000029956245,0.00045558665,0.20299578,0.00014305816,0.000084021354,0.047937162,0.45607397,0.00068265223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07547306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91563416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8401611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005105096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013712778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93068343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399523422","doi":"","title":"« Commentaire » de l’article du Professeur David Gilles, Université de Sherbrooke, « Refus d’obéissance, désobéissance civile, désobéissance civique, comme outils de réflexivité juridique »","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02616213689432237,"score_gpt":0.27889803828389503,"score_spread":0.2527359013895727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399523422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28407395,0.02835869,0.02460374,0.38465753,0.00091564585,0.00088281836,0.00015030321,0.00079835294,0.27555898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903403,0.007939585,0.006851587,0.0014118941,0.0001897454,0.00008150816,0.000055406097,0.000099098026,0.093030855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98636687,0.009214532,0.00076959096,0.0011454318,0.00076341745,0.0017401726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293333,0.0033030263,0.00035969837,0.0015511984,0.0009623614,0.0008903751],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010601778,0.00059884554,0.0005810438,0.00017911756,0.0023040809,0.0005603547,0.0019948552,0.00053751713,0.0010257399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013412856,0.00071729085,0.0003835198,0.0015152416,0.0018135578,0.0010831392,0.0009127874,0.0011077696,0.0002702959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010277506,0.00091476244,0.01572722,0.000814392,0.00013549296,0.00025625085,0.05549693,0.000071398994,0.0072726626,0.8108827,0.083427995,0.02489741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006501578,0.0000064178516,0.011539271,0.0067087263,0.00021890947,0.00017124412,0.0022468278,0.008869711,0.03669948,0.012538832,0.9194017,0.0009487425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017920123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06555357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8359737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002789617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016879383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399765260","doi":"10.7202/1111997ar","title":"Évaluer une politique judiciaire hybride : trajectoire des dossiers d’accusés admis à un programme de justice réparatrice implanté à la Cour du Québec","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.017879059217829747,"score_gpt":0.28579341820988297,"score_spread":0.26791435899205324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399765260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8624649,0.032268967,0.0039056002,0.050360747,0.0011532147,0.0005010733,0.00013093182,0.00049893296,0.048715644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965364,0.003901067,0.0013112779,0.0012176469,0.0012939713,0.000076431985,0.00001135479,0.0000883727,0.026735911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509686,0.000762324,0.0005417323,0.0007635,0.000631633,0.0022039432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963135,0.0019313714,0.00014679223,0.00031912583,0.0001563313,0.0011328594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023343433,0.0005013822,0.0005127741,0.00017364617,0.0018430272,0.0006827399,0.0007010237,0.00074312976,0.00036238387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011483799,0.0005496534,0.0004418942,0.0015397919,0.004150222,0.000642015,0.00006481187,0.0013147602,0.00019219391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001482786,0.00024384104,0.0026871476,0.0019835962,0.0003542457,0.0049099554,0.14143075,0.0002584312,0.00018818972,0.5572137,0.021707192,0.26887465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005864789,0.0003790982,0.012851172,0.0017620529,0.003041644,0.0025865515,0.06977867,0.0027397603,0.0006543035,0.12568845,0.77839535,0.0015364611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41872877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.131168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7566882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006584637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005106564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399820974","doi":"10.1515/9782760526983-011","title":"La Sûreté du Québec","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.025441567247950058,"score_gpt":0.21225977999252807,"score_spread":0.18681821274457802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399820974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024824692,0.004822611,0.00037437148,0.0048734616,0.0004763462,0.00037816193,0.000040212206,0.00024160756,0.9639685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71321774,0.0015920171,0.00011620664,0.00039618445,0.0006547006,0.000007705,0.000005225115,0.000082563005,0.28392765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970104,0.00032570446,0.00044234536,0.0008146925,0.00058980373,0.0008170288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679744,0.0011827943,0.00046339977,0.00062872097,0.00031527827,0.00061237736],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053108257,0.00071304286,0.0006932528,0.00015817529,0.0012419536,0.00014654199,0.0016440618,0.00083263934,0.042965204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018163527,0.0007952226,0.0005718359,0.000041459807,0.0034790218,0.0003739975,0.0006929762,0.0008560266,0.0052567674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004689083,0.00013556978,0.015282248,0.00052617263,0.0005974709,0.0019651738,0.123207316,0.000014725193,0.00013590773,0.5894523,0.039068736,0.22914547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032025806,0.0001462523,0.0010409172,0.0005181484,0.00085973385,0.00011682625,0.0021279384,0.000016793789,0.000106707106,0.0032050957,0.990685,0.00085634476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8989538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9119722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014017236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044103926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400152437","doi":"10.1787/1b20375e-en","title":"The Regulated Conduct Defence ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; European Commission","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.12646414298901454,"score_gpt":0.36907640341275016,"score_spread":0.24261226042373563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400152437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023377001,0.0028276576,0.0000013491718,0.007184801,0.0011512343,0.00028593568,0.000010343214,0.00012772645,0.9881772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92732304,0.020891247,0.000049514336,0.0015703059,0.0031665098,0.000051643856,0.000032594697,0.000037598515,0.04687756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975976,0.00032051394,0.00034930537,0.00039945278,0.0007671958,0.0005659432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847835,0.00046699462,0.00029691117,0.00037917672,0.00016919235,0.00020935456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013992026,0.00026441185,0.00031939297,0.00006389123,0.0028333124,0.00038514164,0.0004435165,0.00033430883,0.00045090204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020214387,0.00020555842,0.00014831296,0.00017355682,0.0015978308,0.00008555632,0.0000825178,0.00043827918,0.00009896888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012692296,0.000009546203,0.00006105547,0.00003245388,0.000028792727,0.000008678662,0.0014106614,2.510957e-7,0.00002078872,0.9823417,0.004836751,0.011236642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006278289,0.00002435014,0.00023637927,0.000395702,0.000057212957,0.000027061835,0.00048862596,3.068423e-7,0.000014211634,0.006964782,0.99146354,0.00026503968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04910966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027059399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023554655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011046829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400238336","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4878572","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Common law","score_opus":0.0462843191204068,"score_gpt":0.33549360916416326,"score_spread":0.28920929004375645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400238336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973671,0.009995208,9.1080125e-7,0.015510294,0.000051899737,0.0002468742,0.000008322951,0.000002663671,0.00051280204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824956,0.016750941,3.4386838e-7,0.00068830367,0.000028034441,0.000009280433,0.0000040919203,0.000005081232,0.000018345392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949357,0.0036958822,0.00026688594,0.00010586557,0.00037183784,0.0006238568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981565,0.0015123768,0.00009292409,0.00013599005,0.00006764038,0.000034562316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069528986,0.000104005834,0.0001720708,0.00009251013,0.00053902005,0.0000797229,0.00041833264,0.000044866807,0.000007877685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058660284,0.00005630812,0.000027495695,0.0008932792,0.00033091346,0.00008941118,0.00005356874,0.002044305,1.828459e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019564496,0.00004127002,0.0017878608,0.00004906804,0.000017547289,0.000018594834,0.0071144816,0.000018565337,0.000014820375,0.9895963,0.000041482825,0.0011043332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069595565,0.0006304023,0.024635328,0.009678254,0.00014554932,0.00023963186,0.26497406,0.00015507067,0.00017102985,0.58260006,0.115693994,0.00038065386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9381296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40699625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058613135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049401843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88816017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400292151","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4852570","title":"A Lifeline During Custodial Interrogations? The Right to Counsel and Reflections on R. v. Dussault and R. v. Lafrance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; Political science; Law; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02209849200361528,"score_gpt":0.3503834680058488,"score_spread":0.3282849760022335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400292151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8887514,0.00871435,0.0011579887,0.09612088,0.0007087542,0.00021501644,0.0000032588543,0.0000784418,0.0042499043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987292,0.0068834866,0.000023141554,0.000249823,0.0010014322,0.000008255734,2.505177e-7,0.000007935449,0.004533658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986305,0.000103123864,0.00013608937,0.00016405537,0.00023118043,0.00073502806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996067,0.00014209775,0.000027397613,0.00006729403,0.000056049725,0.00010043694],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013543793,0.00008068161,0.00007738179,0.00007532114,0.0014411779,0.00029282348,0.00012708287,0.000042846397,0.000025485113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015277845,0.000055685367,0.00003574668,0.00024453353,0.0001432388,0.00021459012,0.000014782897,0.0009257937,0.000028333241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015822222,0.000041789226,0.00023477197,0.00002236376,0.00009869695,0.000022261891,0.027117992,0.00004930581,0.0016953716,0.94810253,0.002444575,0.020012138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004631239,0.00067306944,0.0016437292,0.00047883517,0.00013605344,0.0010159385,0.028181432,0.00013590742,0.0002525207,0.21539398,0.7512135,0.00041194714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000541024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044275805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7487689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003453189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006199695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401019200","doi":"10.29173/alr2781","title":"Transforming Canadian Criminal Justice: A Review of Indictment: The Criminal Justice System on Trial, Benjamin Perrin (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal trial; Sociology","score_opus":0.0785363183776411,"score_gpt":0.37041615143805157,"score_spread":0.29187983306041043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401019200","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.2465823e-7,0.8336921,9.2760234e-7,0.00047240005,0.0009715998,0.004627673,0.00019375552,0.00002055496,0.16002068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000027788927,0.9958934,0.0000199078,0.00050143595,0.00042940793,0.00010012947,0.00007944772,0.000052349224,0.0028960952],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939807,0.0016284657,0.0016710396,0.0008111171,0.0011187133,0.0007899664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567556,0.0014092046,0.0010596673,0.0010576581,0.00027835066,0.00051958114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003352238,0.0007375776,0.0034278845,0.00002559319,0.0008451486,0.000069953014,0.0019406943,0.00039069197,0.0014064594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065197214,0.0005314038,0.0015610488,0.00027425203,0.00054502103,0.0004549116,0.000119869735,0.0005461179,0.000120953846],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049903825,0.000043249143,5.6442917e-9,0.696517,0.00017585995,0.000033369022,0.0018841112,3.149661e-8,9.33851e-9,0.16929832,0.013890443,0.1181077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018703521,0.00012806428,2.4862013e-8,0.3860672,0.06978078,0.00001721979,0.0017570948,3.222902e-7,3.8349725e-8,0.0000013149506,0.54180396,0.00025692274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95048004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95645255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5279135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023259243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002866043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401224343","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.3","title":"Reasonable Bail or Bail at All Costs? Defence Counsel Perspectives on a Coercive Environment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Law and economics; Computer security; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0259015396429139,"score_gpt":0.2830606211934454,"score_spread":0.25715908155053147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401224343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8642606,0.016942315,0.000082244216,0.032832745,0.0014513893,0.0005115266,0.00034214932,0.000044942142,0.08353205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97364867,0.0074372357,0.0002310164,0.00382164,0.0004524918,0.000010144787,0.0000068052404,0.00003438627,0.014357585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978798,0.00016991704,0.0003620282,0.0004149184,0.00027368654,0.0008996593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969729,0.0005765645,0.00015539142,0.00019800835,0.00019235208,0.0019047668],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017273756,0.00023931758,0.00038984607,0.00006355399,0.0011558109,0.00036159105,0.00037028588,0.00022267069,0.0009855125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023887052,0.00023029839,0.00034443315,0.00017412262,0.0010827928,0.0005230316,0.00002467308,0.0005439319,0.000029705043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038800492,0.000018908599,0.00007276667,0.000082143844,0.00017548057,0.00081535615,0.26788068,0.00002203741,0.00003867158,0.7042233,0.024783822,0.0018480433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024548732,0.00028008994,0.00014408557,0.00043747597,0.00014390539,0.00023249717,0.14798966,0.00005981516,0.000008927481,0.003472286,0.84666383,0.00032191214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2071239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8301131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82188004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056116697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023689482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401309785","doi":"10.59962/9780774870498-006","title":"2 Quebec and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014895869664800523,"score_gpt":0.19424806057983904,"score_spread":0.1793521909150385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401309785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00313967,0.0013984236,6.529785e-7,0.00018125682,0.00011499732,0.00030509572,0.00027840253,0.000014672344,0.99456686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1628451,0.0002478501,0.000012493777,0.000017306511,0.000045276836,1.8157203e-7,0.0000022461343,0.000006293776,0.8368232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992646,0.000031993117,0.00010530234,0.0002172641,0.00023160264,0.00014923298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994318,0.000086025386,0.00008937658,0.00012768048,0.00011613735,0.0001489941],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021530774,0.0000679223,0.0002600153,0.00003177256,0.00048090026,0.0001885101,0.00023766277,0.00020541353,0.0001716539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000066701514,0.00011139976,0.00007739602,0.0000051284646,0.0034855308,0.000063771164,0.00010659006,0.00017692012,0.0000018336567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003270011,0.0000042104316,0.000024162044,0.00023602921,0.00016099928,0.0003208914,0.0145089645,7.509696e-8,8.077509e-7,0.89837486,0.071149655,0.015186644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027869965,0.000016937745,0.00023832949,0.00066694856,0.00021308662,0.0000107043,0.0004354463,0.0000034910381,2.3527814e-7,0.034792632,0.9632028,0.00014069828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8920531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006684404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024749784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401504973","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4907051","title":"Tribunals for Access to Justice in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Computer security; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.042783526163790865,"score_gpt":0.3849530558555388,"score_spread":0.3421695296917479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401504973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6982356,0.022410495,0.023585862,0.23644431,0.0060052737,0.0012128826,0.000035142555,0.00007553394,0.0119949095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532986,0.001421802,0.000026002428,0.0005018444,0.00065202743,0.000013731206,6.0551355e-7,0.000008033443,0.0020460777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976444,0.00006333582,0.00017368812,0.00013954176,0.00028872513,0.0016903074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994515,0.00028222302,0.000024934378,0.000050663737,0.000062950996,0.00012773552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023407808,0.00006588321,0.00010294634,0.000077601035,0.00028199155,0.00024994463,0.00040059778,0.000027886477,0.000048939444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037427864,0.00006024356,0.00004556693,0.0003521898,0.000016614544,0.00034259885,0.000021538952,0.00056366983,0.000010382415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011182659,0.000019609153,0.0012889757,0.00007136571,0.00005018014,0.000044667147,0.0022589667,0.0003508822,0.000055268847,0.86140555,0.032894276,0.10144841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021156414,0.00014393413,0.000612812,0.00018420296,0.00009698129,0.000055959325,0.027951501,0.00018120835,0.00005239828,0.23523577,0.7350124,0.0002612684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87922966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7021181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004658775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029792039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535339","doi":"10.7202/1107397ar","title":"LES NOUVEAUX ALINÉAS 258(1) C) ET D) DU CODE CRIMINEL : PROBLÈME DE CONSTITUTIONNALITÉ ?","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04540679286980958,"score_gpt":0.2697645118999523,"score_spread":0.22435771903014273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5479341,0.008730199,0.011740544,0.033650678,0.0006819496,0.0005136768,0.00011604662,0.00024977385,0.39638302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89102817,0.012590723,0.0033527098,0.0011125194,0.00065674516,0.000007097604,0.000019143712,0.00003631068,0.09119658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972792,0.00040676465,0.00034794587,0.0005376604,0.0003669741,0.0010614563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832135,0.0003067694,0.00019181389,0.00035572343,0.00021446422,0.0006098725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008718505,0.00032183868,0.00041432583,0.000114922776,0.0016509616,0.00006406351,0.0006907082,0.00046927205,0.0010177478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023974116,0.00044227284,0.00032112005,0.00043350257,0.0017214824,0.000492722,0.0001959836,0.00047130758,0.00027117104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012230009,0.00020855165,0.020532725,0.00040175577,0.00008302698,0.0021705122,0.022870492,0.0018597592,0.00064131955,0.94021046,0.009116343,0.0017827227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069025764,0.00013797177,0.009538911,0.00087442744,0.00037392322,0.0018287199,0.0037630214,0.0017671512,0.00050087506,0.006278612,0.9736098,0.00063633715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025394741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01857873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96449345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046413457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012883982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535386","doi":"10.7202/1107471ar","title":"[ Sans Titre - No Title ]\"CRIMINAL LAW SOURCEBOOK\"","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01501260120989535,"score_gpt":0.23509588906636109,"score_spread":0.22008328785646575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013566491,0.0023692765,0.00017915556,0.0040976275,0.00034620482,0.000084405845,0.000013808334,0.000058410194,0.97928464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15558957,0.0012659471,0.0012474536,0.0008935685,0.0015391677,0.0000010024698,0.0000047272983,0.000022971737,0.8394356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989744,0.00006213216,0.00011299058,0.00022238817,0.00016123711,0.00046689282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994092,0.00006379493,0.00005052896,0.00018623463,0.00005109354,0.00023915233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019860808,0.00012614821,0.00014992846,0.00003536363,0.000374515,0.00003781223,0.00030705868,0.00019612368,0.01627229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001835531,0.000173795,0.00014535105,0.000114104034,0.00030635542,0.00017842877,0.00007564629,0.00020126185,0.010650318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032093387,0.00005885926,0.00018058068,0.00018518924,0.000028347597,0.00018359492,0.0053982544,0.00010395541,0.000289575,0.91287357,0.06598069,0.014685288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012734195,0.000040500636,0.00010362061,0.00020508544,0.00014960209,0.000053985586,0.00072040205,0.0003803571,0.00023370518,0.0011141303,0.99667066,0.000200609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021621312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006297189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017702819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012045692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535623","doi":"10.7202/1107464ar","title":"LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA ET L’IMPRÉCISION : QUAND L’AVERTISSEMENT RAISONNABLE DEVIENT SYMBOLIQUE","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012334892202827913,"score_gpt":0.23703598648366236,"score_spread":0.22470109428083446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7815734,0.012486156,0.00092140096,0.049121276,0.0006432009,0.00039903057,0.00004880166,0.00006736287,0.15473936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8833067,0.008723098,0.00047670558,0.0010030442,0.0004491945,0.0000043714676,0.000008284324,0.000028966006,0.10599968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973652,0.00043060162,0.0003222638,0.0004642822,0.00048089997,0.00093680236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837697,0.00040772607,0.00014865122,0.0003093849,0.00014044513,0.00061684666],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012010311,0.000278518,0.0003639104,0.0000721925,0.00069792476,0.00009149069,0.00056123984,0.00029860684,0.001496246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014142322,0.00036500132,0.00017218296,0.00033592497,0.00021038816,0.000425629,0.00019895188,0.00037597548,0.00011807472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021698819,0.0003320048,0.011086666,0.0006860936,0.00012728001,0.0021029797,0.022318743,0.0050037373,0.0008613287,0.8292941,0.09513094,0.03283915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046206889,0.00008382635,0.0036929701,0.000729902,0.00015881432,0.00022320433,0.003501852,0.0015691157,0.0006365364,0.00067523244,0.9878477,0.00041876503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6538878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.940534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89271677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011804538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001800267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401673234","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2023-040","title":"The Great Rise . . . and Then the Great Fall: Toronto Police Service's Enforcement of the <i>Ontario Safe Streets Act</i>, 2000–2022","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Service (business); Law enforcement; Political science; Business; Public administration; Criminology; History; Law; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.02832835872979492,"score_gpt":0.2830987621332533,"score_spread":0.25477040340345836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401673234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13077423,0.044151135,6.0075286e-7,0.550716,0.0023341365,0.0008857924,0.00046908218,0.00003660741,0.27063245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87801737,0.0029127172,0.0000034758257,0.006369801,0.0012780834,0.00004895279,0.00000600714,0.000031156243,0.111332454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966171,0.0004026477,0.00042920513,0.0004417209,0.000674737,0.0014346364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997277,0.0004222328,0.00013547779,0.00090687675,0.00018326154,0.001075156],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012035226,0.00035632658,0.00026740794,0.00009057713,0.002465744,0.0010466947,0.0017909522,0.00021903364,0.0025023588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001301392,0.00020616569,0.00020996518,0.0010258526,0.0013835824,0.00088482193,0.0003126659,0.00044053915,0.00006961644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011379326,0.000013581109,0.0026439033,0.00010231093,0.00018534719,0.000007678625,0.16658078,0.0000049816144,0.0000036964213,0.6179302,0.09653471,0.11598149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010499857,0.000043223157,0.005866784,0.0001408227,0.00012347607,0.000024451498,0.012082347,0.0001130868,0.0000047942585,0.0021589578,0.9791058,0.00023125917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8825711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050925585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016789226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401881495","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4916196","title":"Substantial deference and tribunal expertisepost-Dunsmuir: A new approach to reasonableness review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Deference; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.039573070708174944,"score_gpt":0.33825559929090565,"score_spread":0.2986825285827307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401881495","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049104482,0.8562919,0.035460852,0.038031988,0.00080617314,0.00079859135,0.0000053722665,0.00020589468,0.019294737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71198195,0.27808198,0.00036296924,0.00049140456,0.00086854614,0.000013785664,0.0000019488277,0.000019565903,0.008177828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968167,0.00020727652,0.0002768002,0.00035429187,0.0005338298,0.0018110978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924594,0.00010098229,0.000050021627,0.00013160029,0.000089245645,0.0003822078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031348974,0.000158211,0.00024509244,0.000080165875,0.00051118736,0.000356455,0.00037846167,0.0000762932,0.00010761833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031787192,0.0001329743,0.000112177644,0.0005099394,0.0000937915,0.00044474643,0.000046348603,0.0009182171,0.00007671943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007916083,0.00003769572,0.00008751336,0.00021302099,0.000066286004,0.00002094711,0.00483532,0.000002197703,0.00015082693,0.7846885,0.011277284,0.19854127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036569944,0.00033388438,0.00014250296,0.0035469679,0.00030082255,0.0016482389,0.011837105,0.000060298436,0.00005385522,0.10803454,0.8729952,0.0006809079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00193239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036606637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006230979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054953704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401912214","doi":"10.54648/aila2024031","title":"Richard Arthern v. Ryanair","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Air and Space Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.020982382014231152,"score_gpt":0.3099198387789103,"score_spread":0.28893745676467913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401912214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18206125,0.009671884,0.00019534377,0.10907732,0.00080168986,0.00013660485,0.0000050119165,0.00033002486,0.6977209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856613,0.0004684893,0.000043611435,0.0005590347,0.00023485722,0.000002620551,3.630551e-7,0.000004686045,0.013025037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995166,0.000029600313,0.000043158325,0.00012914377,0.00012723723,0.0001542357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997672,0.00007317033,0.000005890226,0.00006169821,0.000013595104,0.00007844569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020852085,0.000046805584,0.000058002577,0.0000123309665,0.00025529307,0.00009505941,0.000059329763,0.000037489797,0.00012655277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015845739,0.00003939136,0.00002996873,0.00008849954,0.00019043067,0.0001608138,0.000018410843,0.000060788178,0.00022978056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026328307,0.000004622916,0.00046215454,0.00002508054,0.0000057662814,0.00002293748,0.0066087516,7.157047e-7,0.000034767432,0.9739521,0.014483166,0.004397308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001904582,0.00001673562,0.00024807145,0.000036955156,0.000009658509,0.0000017067867,0.0015652666,0.000018845863,0.0000602532,0.0106112,0.98734915,0.00006312952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008286276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015375847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97286594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014270835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029358735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402029116","doi":"","title":"La propagande terroriste saisie par le droit pénal : étude comparée du droit français et du droit canadien","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Criminal law; Political science; Comparative law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019981300905861067,"score_gpt":0.28373701639914317,"score_spread":0.2637557154932821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402029116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7641533,0.0021715756,0.00007263614,0.0043837046,0.0025393565,0.00088673626,0.00018608403,0.00026775873,0.22533883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915241,0.0010273794,0.00010258412,0.00044054366,0.0013976546,0.00018155325,0.00038978504,0.00017899318,0.004757417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934197,0.0007380259,0.0011624936,0.0014635387,0.0016557097,0.0015605096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964976,0.0010006415,0.0005327256,0.0007515649,0.00038547,0.0008320041],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002492743,0.0009909098,0.0013463014,0.00029359874,0.0014491208,0.00069567416,0.0017788127,0.000908769,0.0011317162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005078862,0.0010645032,0.000667606,0.0009773086,0.001204558,0.0008130653,0.00021633314,0.0016108019,0.0020426284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025181056,0.00052455824,0.008219924,0.0013035147,0.00045486988,0.0013078051,0.33809608,0.00013056854,0.00043251246,0.63975096,0.0024854254,0.0070419726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015312072,0.0007774647,0.076442584,0.0062203687,0.0024495116,0.0004013192,0.27211282,0.0017243956,0.0016405659,0.049497817,0.582976,0.0042259893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69699955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81681794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5902531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000972357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016465915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402150640","doi":"10.61737/lylc4661","title":"Use of facial recognition by police forces in the public space in Quebec and Canada : elements of comparison with the United States and Europe : English summary","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law enforcement; Software deployment; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Intrusion; Public order; Political science; Executive order; Law; Legislation; Business; Computer security; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.08520904410900011,"score_gpt":0.31107546557194915,"score_spread":0.22586642146294905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402150640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98136055,0.00026074555,0.0000018001175,0.006048118,0.00005677602,0.00043665324,0.00020763409,0.0000059849394,0.011621725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993196,0.005070825,0.000017715052,0.00020555251,0.000048123646,0.000009780481,0.00037161694,0.000008075885,0.001072324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824166,0.00041457167,0.00031807154,0.00017628845,0.0006602878,0.0001891326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855095,0.00064610626,0.0002913612,0.00008650502,0.00037019813,0.000054880642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008618533,0.00011878304,0.00026018295,0.00007401545,0.00010345792,0.000118557036,0.00018329598,0.000058476504,0.000021858978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052219717,0.00006932661,0.00001152534,0.00049178104,0.00030939552,0.00023064685,0.0000551459,0.00020413996,4.4286686e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015370209,0.000096555115,0.45105827,0.0004483266,0.00007142108,0.000011559591,0.095388405,0.000006719559,0.000010789305,0.0004870205,0.44456774,0.0076994984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010417679,0.00006211568,0.008637787,0.00014224333,0.00003422131,4.7520626e-7,0.08067787,0.000017343576,0.0000125263805,0.0000063386296,0.9101947,0.00011021702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46562696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093899485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013822775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28270572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402310317","doi":"10.1522/revueot.v33n2.1802","title":"Intégrité publique au Canada : description, critiques et observations des réformes proposées par le projet de loi C-290 à la Loi sur la protection des fonctionnaires divulgateurs d’actes répréhensibles","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Organisations & territoires","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04598117788292807,"score_gpt":0.2732151909205739,"score_spread":0.22723401303764582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402310317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79342103,0.008016126,0.005747313,0.18661998,0.0012999161,0.0011565007,0.00019248493,0.0006858686,0.0028607456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825193,0.0030733303,0.005132558,0.00029516523,0.0010674787,0.0004070446,0.000076167715,0.00009681547,0.007332137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959416,0.0012532922,0.00073525397,0.0007018299,0.000512352,0.0008556962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734026,0.00094694766,0.00018989136,0.00033914155,0.00087011006,0.00031363155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015086522,0.0004731067,0.000393905,0.00028550814,0.002883632,0.0019706811,0.0004511804,0.00039372724,0.00008557787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028319247,0.00050052017,0.00018241837,0.0013571854,0.0021976684,0.005323639,0.00013025335,0.0006260552,0.0000129381415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004957419,0.0010640065,0.14853638,0.006959378,0.00039601023,0.0001816022,0.13851126,0.0003534003,0.010389213,0.5283542,0.06679292,0.098412044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015542914,0.00016081483,0.17332877,0.004675499,0.0002551264,0.00030798835,0.009554905,0.0004566987,0.0038711447,0.08031195,0.72622186,0.0006998142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65942895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047798436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029030837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402501614","doi":"10.3917/rjj.190.1239","title":"Injonctions, outrages au tribunal et le droit de manifester au Québec","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de la recherche juridique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.1987796980824261,"score_gpt":0.41695793802268233,"score_spread":0.21817823994025623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402501614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36106446,0.009762192,0.007801847,0.45905703,0.0010020782,0.0002614536,0.000042134794,0.00013974651,0.16086906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86512965,0.006539128,0.008918283,0.00205664,0.001995178,0.000058421356,0.000014886192,0.000053442163,0.11523439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059564,0.0075258976,0.00039403443,0.00046506047,0.00022003225,0.00079934235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401474,0.0049321526,0.00014085718,0.0003678863,0.00017370899,0.00037066537],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009171664,0.00024671972,0.00036544958,0.000051537896,0.00044849908,0.00019157844,0.0003807515,0.0011770483,0.0003126153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004653552,0.00030538847,0.000300993,0.0005230013,0.00047079418,0.00044216696,0.00011047799,0.0017279773,0.00017750177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081256905,0.0008170337,0.018565109,0.00096546195,0.00014462594,0.0011840792,0.073684014,0.00015636913,0.0031201392,0.8482723,0.009289423,0.043720186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212196,0.00007800681,0.018293416,0.00081746996,0.00018659563,0.00086268754,0.0064458726,0.00006207046,0.0054274085,0.031316828,0.9357039,0.00048454126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47926116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.680047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065324614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032154497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402869720","doi":"10.5040/9781509966936.ch-011","title":"Administrative Tribunals in Canada: Constitutional Subordinates or Equal Partners?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.17019739520161173,"score_gpt":0.4443136360724759,"score_spread":0.27411624087086417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402869720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019219997,0.0012191354,0.000027997456,0.0038309174,0.0006194472,0.00020480873,0.00015926086,0.00006105602,0.99385816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15744682,0.00019110512,0.000048147045,0.00018442776,0.00029925743,0.000021431506,0.00001279448,0.000030021072,0.841766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869573,0.00009239701,0.00018906915,0.0002806832,0.00042952932,0.00031258148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994731,0.00022692159,0.000059237533,0.000082507126,0.000029693781,0.00012856715],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029374321,0.00015134804,0.00024970592,0.00008246556,0.00006509646,0.00006351421,0.00019774643,0.00014043436,0.030029913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002491813,0.00011472302,0.00004117384,0.00023593573,0.0006634707,0.000050381987,0.000028714256,0.00017593525,0.00032950775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009064312,0.0000062912522,0.00010246583,0.00002381757,0.000011583711,0.0001657107,0.0001831932,1.43548e-7,1.3634144e-7,0.4085132,0.590862,0.00012242184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006047846,0.00001710065,0.00001607312,0.00028033127,0.000018529356,0.000002267319,0.0057018306,0.0000010933843,0.000005566446,0.0014226609,0.9922926,0.0001815042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.987286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4070905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005788099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015597047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402956675","doi":"10.46626/affc.2024.18.2.8","title":"A Study on the Improvement of Punishment System in the Inquisitorial Structure : In Relation to an Introduction of the Discipline System in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"교정담론","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Punishment (psychology); Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.02131950438015638,"score_gpt":0.30086681878508914,"score_spread":0.27954731440493275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402956675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907851,0.000020723237,0.0000017281423,0.0061318837,0.0020139862,0.0009004824,0.000006872048,0.0000042145193,0.00013500695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,4.7368394e-7,0.0000012094578,0.000012806078,0.00061894,0.000027854141,8.264492e-7,0.0000026567552,0.00001153033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863535,0.00035049187,0.0002610994,0.00014365125,0.00050639594,0.00010303497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958205,0.000104612904,0.00005753042,0.00021557198,0.00002572262,0.000014518768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001396986,0.00005418228,0.000097536846,0.000040465296,0.000083744315,0.000030918476,0.00026460033,0.000023766217,0.0000029744779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062482315,0.000026399295,0.000014733843,0.00048403375,0.000026209611,0.000068059264,0.00004076104,0.00013289352,2.4177828e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028677686,0.0002672824,0.0638812,0.0005366899,0.00003030382,0.000026209911,0.60340077,0.0079171285,0.0037302524,0.31327885,0.002049788,0.004594767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016894638,0.00024166168,0.21686949,0.00040925373,0.000019862971,6.447788e-7,0.77987534,0.00032542503,0.00035095695,0.0001561126,0.0015113835,0.0000709525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7445355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9656808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31312275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010701779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002741777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2798478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403010128","doi":"10.3138/9781487560218","title":"Canadian Criminal Law in Ten Cases","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04197789523678117,"score_gpt":0.269140855534661,"score_spread":0.22716296029787983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403010128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006025069,0.0027712265,5.6858613e-7,0.0001234653,0.00023923685,0.00019663286,0.00010988996,0.000031757747,0.996467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009062226,0.000291809,0.000047919068,0.000044571167,0.00013121069,2.4660048e-7,0.000009087285,0.00001193754,0.99040097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893534,0.00007010849,0.00011310747,0.00027809455,0.00028739416,0.0003159646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930817,0.000100111465,0.00006496738,0.0001949341,0.00008037189,0.00025145765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019512426,0.00014650947,0.00025290213,0.000039529743,0.0002530309,0.000041385192,0.0005308449,0.0002524738,0.00038975824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016792299,0.00018707255,0.00011929061,0.0000020374673,0.00047629306,0.00015335047,0.00010734155,0.00019762904,0.000021403035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004920407,0.00001009849,0.0000062019863,0.00030169557,0.000046003835,0.0018157252,0.064196795,0.0000014550421,0.0000015083881,0.80363107,0.123995386,0.005944849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060903505,0.000032526375,0.000016863529,0.0004180946,0.00015452856,0.0000028780557,0.0015302596,0.0000017119513,0.000002542456,0.0009350221,0.9966552,0.00018945748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024429106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018799304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76285976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403267736","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue09-14","title":"BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THESE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES IN ANGLO-SAXON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Presumption; Burden of proof; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17731804151152897,"score_gpt":0.43609654220686533,"score_spread":0.25877850069533637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403267736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052141856,0.9455981,0.0000040489904,0.0007598849,0.00021207999,0.0004429325,0.000023943438,0.0000033248293,0.00081383117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3358958,0.66383505,0.00006153537,0.00008018488,0.00010697329,0.0000056212243,3.7671228e-7,0.000005650647,0.000008797842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961781,0.0008518263,0.0013391775,0.00028501305,0.0007558907,0.0005900317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966342,0.0009776292,0.0014342503,0.00022360153,0.0004855516,0.00024477212],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026963644,0.00022521919,0.0018402485,0.00025144048,0.0001242715,0.000039842304,0.00079860765,0.0000846092,0.000007847844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070986524,0.00013349847,0.00018274072,0.00061000267,0.016376058,0.0002104267,0.00026457664,0.00044287252,7.889495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004748006,0.000060696795,0.000010950585,0.07709679,0.000043461965,0.000021191734,0.0038360776,9.497782e-7,0.000045448007,0.8579016,0.000011520721,0.06092384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056778453,0.0071156994,0.0009678557,0.4268056,0.020146362,0.0034426022,0.16517875,0.00006920894,0.00009543973,0.009130477,0.36533657,0.0011436882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070771007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060720453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8487711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015750183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010493718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403954946","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5004791","title":"What to Do about the Decay of the Conventions of the Canadian Constitution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.020080256739263003,"score_gpt":0.3190123575640495,"score_spread":0.2989321008247865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403954946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6104151,0.04056954,0.000609025,0.29224348,0.008273932,0.0009023105,0.000016778347,0.000020929776,0.04694888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578017,0.0018577635,0.0000016428638,0.00013941423,0.00014360221,0.0000025483143,8.6532516e-8,0.000002542075,0.0020722528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986231,0.00018381364,0.00015749344,0.000070932656,0.00032326064,0.0006414174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995437,0.00008812859,0.00006243403,0.00013708617,0.00010338715,0.00006523928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022210411,0.000047656962,0.00006280559,0.00003575581,0.001131897,0.00019333711,0.00051619817,0.000038007296,0.00006184212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013017739,0.000022974835,0.00013933357,0.0003781182,0.00050402974,0.00020324353,0.000026355978,0.0005883799,0.000010903281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002163717,0.0000037400123,0.0005780722,0.000003234716,0.000023152335,2.891259e-7,0.0030307935,0.00002404459,0.00007059414,0.99191564,0.0004736002,0.0038746672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116623094,0.000086422,0.0055070887,0.000925847,0.00019070793,0.00013112277,0.060585115,0.00001758196,0.0008980433,0.35995734,0.57143885,0.00014524227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12387023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94897825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.825108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072937616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011172436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403973737","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5006054","title":"Synopsis - Indefinite Detention Under Part XX.1 of the Criminal Code and Winko v. British Columbia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.020443718064620198,"score_gpt":0.28095428259806127,"score_spread":0.26051056453344107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403973737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825367,0.011161145,0.00039093813,0.0027947114,0.0005756802,0.000104890496,0.000008498746,0.000027817176,0.0023996208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817924,0.009404979,0.00001389247,0.00008455185,0.00026034887,0.00000269167,5.8750504e-7,0.00000994953,0.008430593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980869,0.00018877808,0.00022270903,0.00016095962,0.00040926604,0.0009313361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995722,0.00011077852,0.00008132303,0.00008294362,0.00008116452,0.000071581235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020131941,0.00006260165,0.00011956787,0.00002591748,0.00073496,0.0005849726,0.00022216287,0.00007639067,0.00014095369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001269181,0.00006814945,0.000112740505,0.00023073757,0.0003182427,0.0002830275,0.000041236992,0.0008271546,0.0000061778683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006381088,0.0001711316,0.04048743,0.00022717786,0.0004928909,0.00005054941,0.0065662037,0.000027040196,0.000784679,0.6523556,0.01587951,0.28289396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036235043,0.00034697534,0.039762657,0.0009885039,0.00058959576,0.0013535182,0.029092452,0.000064497544,0.000032414457,0.8184223,0.10861782,0.00036688652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023618463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5675128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54389435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034481482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016956266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98288333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404021743","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5007163","title":"&lt;span&gt;Toward a Trauma-informed Approach to Evidence Law: Witness Credibility and Reliability&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Span (engineering); Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Law; Political science; Engineering; Structural engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.044395370758889614,"score_gpt":0.3337618910412258,"score_spread":0.28936652028233617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404021743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.870286,0.028641382,0.020150136,0.028528044,0.0015469653,0.0017155955,0.000014362727,0.00046833698,0.048649166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899549,0.00596514,0.00054365443,0.00022781194,0.0008716938,0.00005490439,0.000002027222,0.000032961823,0.002346896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99359965,0.00047266492,0.0007371741,0.0008200213,0.0012999454,0.0030705698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770933,0.00079986715,0.00015273369,0.0004219386,0.00030548274,0.0006106355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011084704,0.00036745952,0.00056065904,0.00017335177,0.001122505,0.0008284205,0.0008851042,0.00024194898,0.00006475648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001896786,0.0003069848,0.00029693847,0.0007841472,0.0008087618,0.0017345939,0.00015322125,0.001961403,0.000080469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046101297,0.00014900269,0.000791385,0.00033717044,0.00010926363,0.0000154988,0.016350206,0.00013639762,0.00024599777,0.95432454,0.0008916092,0.026187927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010503057,0.0015879661,0.0049418006,0.001550499,0.0005856851,0.00088983035,0.030507296,0.0017331694,0.00019146604,0.7596647,0.19558966,0.0017076138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024790862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016371548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19469805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024813735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006145579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404021835","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5005205","title":"&lt;span&gt;Judicial Misconduct in the Sexual Assault Trial&lt;/span&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Sexual assault; Misconduct; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Poison control; Engineering; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.041687808377399244,"score_gpt":0.34429651335593775,"score_spread":0.30260870497853853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404021835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8999138,0.021571547,0.00044160656,0.04469925,0.0031211276,0.000751768,0.0000076231186,0.00013494771,0.029358348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855592,0.0038766933,0.000016703005,0.0003141222,0.004252939,0.000021234102,0.0000029578273,0.00002696212,0.0059291557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939118,0.00090778247,0.00052867376,0.00040766626,0.0013467578,0.0028972947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884087,0.0005233801,0.00013642226,0.00023321052,0.000111800684,0.00015429873],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011719671,0.00024486822,0.0003143272,0.00019104344,0.00094788417,0.0006577247,0.0010114321,0.00023380824,0.000261416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006820762,0.0001780061,0.00021395057,0.0007821869,0.00030300158,0.0006381232,0.00005033656,0.0031963412,0.00021853893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014789052,0.00021761749,0.00018314987,0.00002396849,0.00017399483,0.00018401374,0.017988464,0.000031825384,0.0014089312,0.89993966,0.017321603,0.06104787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004494735,0.0015135898,0.00032686122,0.00016908438,0.00024512855,0.00045042922,0.04323677,0.0001236898,0.000043349988,0.30316693,0.6455913,0.00063809525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028941466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09852427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62826973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012833757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007192471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404136825","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4967612","title":"The Rules-Standards Debate and Ontario Civil Procedure Reform: A Case for More Rules?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016289584401450216,"score_gpt":0.3214042181843624,"score_spread":0.30511463378291215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404136825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91042995,0.03819641,0.0012303556,0.036561973,0.0007245567,0.0005922039,0.00004047651,0.00010429078,0.012119773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98155457,0.006159328,0.00004590205,0.00007835113,0.0005179548,0.000021635191,0.0000014483145,0.00001718718,0.011603611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742305,0.00005988593,0.00020432247,0.00020115917,0.0004284648,0.0016831179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994134,0.00013630254,0.000061004124,0.00009473105,0.00016170315,0.00013291257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00478208,0.00012749538,0.00012519152,0.000042475876,0.002239589,0.0006044997,0.00022488402,0.000079650774,0.000024421017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019752243,0.000079905294,0.00011406492,0.000100375226,0.00024376306,0.00035851842,0.00003107136,0.0010938948,0.000006215118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016708348,0.000015226956,0.00012593389,0.000053127274,0.00013066613,0.00026974818,0.01664369,0.0000012272778,0.000013560637,0.9137495,0.0023938783,0.06643636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022452773,0.0002695381,0.000075489734,0.0001366144,0.000113181304,0.0078059216,0.028853334,0.00008190026,0.0000066887183,0.38418853,0.57805514,0.00018914383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029702028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89230716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86260515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041379826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116344765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404297544","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4980786","title":"Mirroring &lt;i&gt;Mens Rea&lt;/i&gt;: The \"Two Pathways to Conviction\" Argument in Canadian Sexual Assault Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Argument (complex analysis); Mirroring; Mens rea; Sexual assault; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.023364901047795435,"score_gpt":0.2977568247208122,"score_spread":0.2743919236730168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404297544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86737114,0.009598191,0.00025611327,0.06761162,0.002299014,0.0006069909,0.000018497723,0.00012643899,0.052112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934647,0.0010373389,0.000022926273,0.00055214716,0.000756303,0.00002210644,0.000001955476,0.000021395661,0.0041211075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538773,0.0002655859,0.00032538842,0.00031174405,0.00067206676,0.0030374755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903363,0.00016041387,0.000054163407,0.00017935042,0.000120108125,0.00045234888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055534625,0.00017299606,0.00016874609,0.00017447153,0.0012443252,0.00041965966,0.0004918291,0.00010336028,0.00012435645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012546619,0.00013984862,0.00007985101,0.0006019697,0.00013858343,0.00034778842,0.000038778617,0.0014828861,0.00021279756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012524188,0.000016681664,0.00021013724,0.0000052059872,0.000042379183,0.000054809196,0.009501396,0.00007295875,0.0018110289,0.9800239,0.0011219637,0.0071269907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019231644,0.00022258742,0.0006360182,0.000107612774,0.00004695835,0.00015559449,0.013556776,0.000114685194,0.00006195966,0.04819759,0.9364271,0.00028075557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42995217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99486804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9353052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005271577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008387286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404307780","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5019889","title":"Unveiling the Truth: Admissibility of Truth Serum Tests in Indian Legal Proceedings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Heritage College","funders":"","keywords":"Post truth; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.01764163506431544,"score_gpt":0.32601901384980186,"score_spread":0.30837737878548643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404307780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98484886,0.0034397824,0.000017308554,0.006339411,0.00047656926,0.000112542475,0.0000016175103,0.0000309913,0.0047329175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788505,0.0010110894,0.000012749177,0.00002399073,0.0004334513,0.0000029691037,1.9952977e-7,0.00001034981,0.00062015484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974684,0.000093448696,0.00032621532,0.00020971106,0.00044214615,0.0014600744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.0004243342,0.000090985406,0.00007872271,0.000084810556,0.00010365004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060426206,0.00010650894,0.00015405733,0.000107609565,0.00034172402,0.00021254443,0.00043061006,0.00008115845,0.00007217983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013307469,0.000074626194,0.00011149964,0.00060829887,0.00019656829,0.0005416722,0.000030491461,0.0016427232,0.000013022811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053189095,0.00005672338,0.011447476,0.00006429283,0.000038919527,0.000017514627,0.014163847,0.000006920417,0.00022535183,0.94673645,0.000093891904,0.027095431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004914427,0.0006181857,0.031859264,0.0007922285,0.00010342974,0.0004371168,0.14237387,0.00023193279,0.0006210636,0.7940299,0.027966637,0.0004748973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001470392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014006091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15270652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008569174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051340437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91075736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404325138","doi":"10.1080/08003831.2024.2410113","title":"Exercising rights over data: a journey towards First Nations data sovereignty in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Borealia","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.11662473458262486,"score_gpt":0.3764881373423983,"score_spread":0.25986340275977343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404325138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19567822,0.0060294834,0.00022310985,0.09868411,0.010075054,0.0014339022,0.015406455,0.00044423813,0.67202544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981216,0.00041508247,0.000110798246,0.000110260386,0.00036739875,0.0000032641885,0.00048752682,0.000008571911,0.0003754748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983934,0.00006802311,0.00021285904,0.00042477832,0.0005658629,0.00033506274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861735,0.00036236088,0.000036431116,0.0008111953,0.0000352055,0.00013747941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007366458,0.00010113993,0.00013427837,0.00007677902,0.0005721796,0.00032771882,0.0013481269,0.000052588704,0.0005474137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005327478,0.00009007829,0.000017018516,0.0005097647,0.00007962645,0.0015954563,0.0003868137,0.00018245738,0.000012395914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103821885,0.0000265318,0.0014493471,0.00007202199,0.000023924275,0.0002443158,0.0043451963,0.000006565259,0.0000041108237,0.09931142,0.8906744,0.0038317714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058426882,0.0000035662893,0.0070996317,0.00027680688,0.000032079486,0.000002874869,0.0013106129,0.0015623384,0.000005325441,0.004174799,0.9853204,0.0001531425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9978203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066150667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033514174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5993796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469161","doi":"10.29173/alr2788","title":"Principled Justice for Indigenous Peoples? An Empirical Analysis of the Application of Gladue Factors in Canadian Lower Courts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04345932600342585,"score_gpt":0.39547253393137005,"score_spread":0.3520132079279442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96288407,0.02208914,0.00009612729,0.006956293,0.0002725757,0.0021335487,0.0000635198,0.000013132255,0.005491603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963126,0.0030609828,0.000024876588,0.00039277982,0.000023920204,0.000046111436,0.000018148776,0.00000598991,0.00011457711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892706,0.00013795878,0.00032078804,0.00019263678,0.00019832446,0.000223206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986711,0.00074990926,0.00009414192,0.000274531,0.00008653469,0.00012379224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007591315,0.000077433375,0.00032319163,0.00006236861,0.00014720517,0.000019949395,0.0003215069,0.000059579423,0.00006428289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051116553,0.00005392158,0.00018889559,0.0011106514,0.00011434652,0.000111201116,0.00001660927,0.00006136137,0.0000033967137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001821158,0.00017688688,0.103956334,0.008767706,0.00033785476,0.0000024742048,0.04191618,0.00008059659,0.000030739102,0.83767486,0.00041119035,0.0066269934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046747085,0.000048393456,0.040876444,0.001534469,0.0040042433,4.9784614e-7,0.00060626166,0.0005118456,0.00002485112,0.00029901273,0.9518594,0.00018782905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8975328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013809973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007371222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21988583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696590","doi":"10.7202/1114751ar","title":"L’accompagnement des personnes victimes lors d’entrevues sur les faits au Québec : pratique ou droit ?","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07283077099402628,"score_gpt":0.3271521683299568,"score_spread":0.2543213973359305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696590","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03177145,0.6700732,0.000018791194,0.21609356,0.0011859218,0.0012029865,0.00003474021,0.0003235516,0.07929578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37358505,0.5365547,0.00035319047,0.0029735595,0.0013068548,0.00023047393,0.000028893588,0.00007895756,0.0848883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961353,0.0007483721,0.0007863864,0.00064495974,0.0006647824,0.001020216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795157,0.0006464617,0.00032874808,0.00042671684,0.00028112833,0.00036540293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002086721,0.00044208713,0.0008414149,0.000054149077,0.0015146368,0.00017869117,0.00067703746,0.0001784857,0.0046243872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065499626,0.00041760935,0.00045834781,0.0010553618,0.0013837799,0.0007850186,0.00016143128,0.0002755211,0.0041941023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005762355,0.00020216375,0.0053371233,0.018848475,0.00012327069,0.00010069201,0.017840158,0.0000082567585,0.000018976294,0.61636776,0.1394934,0.20165396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009932184,0.000103864426,0.0021999066,0.016894072,0.0003767988,0.00001312148,0.0039477223,0.000022097289,0.000028965034,0.0009663644,0.9748705,0.00047723597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5802798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87971103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8353771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007460707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008770272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696846","doi":"10.7202/1114754ar","title":"Return to <i>Smith</i>? Harper-Era Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Canadian Courts (2008–2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Charter; Judicial deference; Jurisdiction; Political science; Discretion; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.036966572389436986,"score_gpt":0.34042043962415347,"score_spread":0.30345386723471646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02762002,0.14645526,0.000002548831,0.28409058,0.0026202407,0.0025399455,0.000110941764,0.00033171993,0.5362287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7161137,0.20087324,0.00031771872,0.053055476,0.0009106856,0.000344559,0.00004797889,0.00007039488,0.02826628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975091,0.00027288048,0.00040786993,0.0004135447,0.00050150865,0.00089508906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986193,0.00014987685,0.000073002855,0.00032472616,0.00010168727,0.00073141657],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002606593,0.00017340784,0.0003942606,0.00011837764,0.0004635997,0.00010205381,0.0005358896,0.00009279562,0.0009929066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005006513,0.0001624095,0.00010495724,0.0011047607,0.00019949261,0.00027086714,0.00005651787,0.00019252965,0.002337257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003265124,0.000019972149,0.005273409,0.0010572525,0.000010112829,0.00034212548,0.0014144819,0.0000016276567,0.000015823036,0.058865912,0.9219269,0.011069092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047367063,0.00001947641,0.0015133376,0.003272938,0.00002095998,0.0000034960958,0.00026860778,0.0000037744076,0.000005685564,0.0002468004,0.9943798,0.00021774441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6856051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68849367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026401426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086742983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405001101","doi":"10.1515/9780776636429-008","title":"CHAPTER A-5 Pandemic Data Sharing: How the Canadian Constitution Has Turned into a Suicide Pact","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pact; Constitution; Pandemic; Data sharing; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.24028348415686115,"score_gpt":0.29753483751487986,"score_spread":0.0572513533580187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405001101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004504012,0.00025867714,0.000085348736,0.0056314184,0.00016048347,0.00038837706,0.00019783124,0.000057054003,0.99317575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77334964,0.00012988357,0.00010312671,0.00019468676,0.000162405,1.8857263e-7,0.0000675235,0.000013780989,0.22597878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985994,0.00004384082,0.00013321618,0.00052307633,0.00042918185,0.0002713042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984578,0.00010321592,0.00023515843,0.0007369401,0.00013710085,0.0003297817],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004680108,0.0002061995,0.00028898916,0.00008429149,0.0013974998,0.00016548585,0.0021109933,0.00030869138,0.00017687376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095044925,0.00020253182,0.00011521975,0.000009725521,0.0022159705,0.00022713919,0.00050813804,0.00043308578,0.000021346616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021299786,0.0000017614433,0.00013739437,0.00003204032,0.000073248724,0.00008684778,0.0058900104,0.0000011733781,0.000009242022,0.98586506,0.0059607504,0.0019211954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001258852,0.000021810372,0.000036198948,0.0001779703,0.00020735085,0.0000031417567,0.0006484131,0.000028674056,0.000007789127,0.0036333955,0.99488103,0.00022834448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80302763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9688612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002674799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010004948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405001236","doi":"10.59962/9780774869980","title":"The Independence of the Prosecutor","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019451198429000713,"score_gpt":0.22218170377015428,"score_spread":0.20273050534115356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405001236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012016847,0.0012683594,0.0000022914683,0.000114062204,0.00057149015,0.00057336804,0.00020614416,0.000038532566,0.9960241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028097508,0.00048059726,0.000014490076,0.000012669541,0.00009223877,6.806583e-7,0.0000012877007,0.000011523642,0.971289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983696,0.00014416991,0.00017020792,0.00026407547,0.00082405104,0.00022789421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988178,0.00021639519,0.00025322384,0.00034866825,0.00029760494,0.000066278226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049871346,0.000076322896,0.00022609411,0.000011996204,0.00082258,0.00023590901,0.0014524213,0.00028416622,0.000068855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007322059,0.00011132254,0.00023871777,0.000025147043,0.002342467,0.00007040601,0.00050358684,0.00043600134,0.0000050069066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020251424,0.000018017543,0.00006386289,0.00034851173,0.00011027463,0.00009780022,0.0061374893,6.691871e-7,0.000006891654,0.02720093,0.93413687,0.031858455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000707099,0.000021830456,0.00023542528,0.0011928319,0.00014725114,0.0000056019326,0.0011117727,0.0000017212153,0.0000031607153,0.005792962,0.99129283,0.0001238761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4897538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84297454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35322073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014666292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012508999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8630917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405189789","doi":"10.7202/1114914ar","title":"La quérulence ou la manie des procédures : une vision québécoise","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014270447051653326,"score_gpt":0.2685174177141623,"score_spread":0.254246970662509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405189789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3649686,0.04556398,0.0015639903,0.016768621,0.00070606975,0.0003383527,0.00003185963,0.00036050894,0.56969804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77582234,0.012665897,0.0006764333,0.00012184112,0.0003826695,0.0000042966003,0.000003737532,0.000040394167,0.21028237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780667,0.00036131183,0.00022304495,0.00055473304,0.0003261811,0.00072809024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856085,0.0006313262,0.000066709785,0.000271453,0.000079590325,0.00039006706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089645624,0.0002613845,0.0002630319,0.00013394673,0.0006645284,0.0002615428,0.0005873553,0.00043146304,0.00046795318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011465739,0.0003245584,0.00026067998,0.00082350115,0.0011039404,0.0007024243,0.0001871642,0.0004965906,0.000495237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008713219,0.00011427986,0.0009929184,0.0025248725,0.00006710467,0.004205714,0.028484024,0.00024190205,0.0013534488,0.8573443,0.006268984,0.098315306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015685722,0.00012976043,0.0036334,0.004393663,0.00029123898,0.00045801024,0.004014743,0.0012660503,0.00032325074,0.027474567,0.9574595,0.00039896634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026520258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057082415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95119053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032199402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005611693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405190042","doi":"10.7202/1114912ar","title":"Les controverses jurisprudentielles administratives et la persistance de l’arrêt <i>Domtar </i>: quelle suite ?","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017221823753380716,"score_gpt":0.2970952891125175,"score_spread":0.27987346535913676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405190042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25530282,0.07968057,0.0026408168,0.01834691,0.0009048116,0.00035034431,0.00017809145,0.00027002106,0.64232564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6966927,0.014217555,0.000669441,0.00022577021,0.00034587536,0.000004170895,0.000006676589,0.00003569759,0.28780213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973462,0.000576113,0.0002628224,0.000585856,0.00033129792,0.0008976903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799013,0.0011177143,0.000104695,0.00026408464,0.00008261286,0.00044073272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010235904,0.0003226131,0.00036814477,0.000107044645,0.0007446145,0.00034655424,0.00059012906,0.0003983866,0.0011862026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013992461,0.000428586,0.00044086753,0.0004313636,0.00091295043,0.00063059735,0.00013992772,0.0005462956,0.00017405534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016403601,0.00011609337,0.0025328929,0.0011306752,0.00019263943,0.0024997073,0.03109109,0.0002116653,0.0023142383,0.94594234,0.008893058,0.0049115587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031193765,0.00013969792,0.001406256,0.0018117924,0.0004357015,0.00021105274,0.01887934,0.00069170725,0.0007919453,0.0054743327,0.9693752,0.00047104154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058044824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016248735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026032007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083071087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405375266","doi":"10.21257/sg.268","title":"La qualité de victime en matière climatique selon la CourEDH","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"sui generis","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cegep de Thetford","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02437061525450331,"score_gpt":0.35913880558412303,"score_spread":0.33476819032961974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405375266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.616367,0.049011998,0.0009076281,0.078155056,0.0030647144,0.0002941875,0.00014774324,0.0003777457,0.25167394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91272396,0.0058934866,0.0020901423,0.0005309479,0.0018271136,0.00003170175,0.000011383398,0.000045660614,0.07684558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970338,0.001445409,0.0002839873,0.00034401883,0.00036791246,0.0005248744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852276,0.0009842386,0.000048763322,0.00020033568,0.000046906607,0.0001969705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026412238,0.00019679374,0.00022302462,0.00005046926,0.00028566015,0.00036130633,0.00031988817,0.00041721843,0.0020438796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016578849,0.00019948414,0.00016408403,0.00040620737,0.00038681645,0.00033273824,0.000086028536,0.000386039,0.001590282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025669427,0.00012619409,0.0015361386,0.0013649028,0.00014317788,0.0006298312,0.2279231,0.00008248366,0.0022701588,0.39589822,0.22627242,0.1437277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047009216,0.000044537486,0.00078406977,0.0004089224,0.00010848509,0.000058840105,0.009208173,0.0007749979,0.0005615986,0.007996448,0.97974545,0.00026145292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008997339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040125484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75347304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031639534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048090934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405465103","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5059519","title":"Book review: Colton Fehr, Constitutionalizing Criminal Law (UBC Press, 2022)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03039932922715176,"score_gpt":0.3441544643674382,"score_spread":0.3137551351402864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405465103","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010062378,0.8932678,0.00035024548,0.024389165,0.0023211439,0.00056030316,0.000023264989,0.000118951306,0.07886851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02227016,0.9273204,0.00004551628,0.0071562184,0.0022265988,0.00006311344,0.000024078181,0.00004239431,0.040851515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993831,0.00050640316,0.00073095754,0.0006484837,0.0013384721,0.0029446767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983946,0.00016011568,0.00042931558,0.00035927465,0.00037420465,0.0002824696],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005828337,0.0004121095,0.00059340365,0.000095863776,0.0013555489,0.0005513268,0.0010980176,0.00037924413,0.0009170472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034112218,0.00039584917,0.0005402946,0.00017019418,0.0008741767,0.00034019013,0.0006186585,0.0078211455,0.00025145884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022367545,0.000031080857,0.0000026914881,0.0007576713,0.00014143113,0.00004785176,0.00041961187,0.000013016003,0.000008274733,0.73745835,0.25927648,0.0018211837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083901825,0.00004890739,0.0000013703711,0.003976908,0.0006012532,0.00026223125,0.00074473425,0.0000074905247,0.000009089227,0.24309649,0.75082684,0.00034079325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007901743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014598205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49436185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033519533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017417092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405487500","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5038145","title":"The rules-standards debate and Ontario Civil Procedure reform: a case for more rules?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.016289584401450216,"score_gpt":0.3214042181843624,"score_spread":0.30511463378291215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405487500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91042995,0.03819641,0.0012303556,0.036561973,0.0007245567,0.0005922039,0.00004047651,0.00010429078,0.012119773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98155457,0.006159328,0.00004590205,0.00007835113,0.0005179548,0.000021635191,0.0000014483145,0.00001718718,0.011603611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742305,0.00005988593,0.00020432247,0.00020115917,0.0004284648,0.0016831179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994134,0.00013630254,0.000061004124,0.00009473105,0.00016170315,0.00013291257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00478208,0.00012749538,0.00012519152,0.000042475876,0.002239589,0.0006044997,0.00022488402,0.000079650774,0.000024421017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019752243,0.000079905294,0.00011406492,0.000100375226,0.00024376306,0.00035851842,0.00003107136,0.0010938948,0.000006215118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016708348,0.000015226956,0.00012593389,0.000053127274,0.00013066613,0.00026974818,0.01664369,0.0000012272778,0.000013560637,0.9137495,0.0023938783,0.06643636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022452773,0.0002695381,0.000075489734,0.0001366144,0.000113181304,0.0078059216,0.028853334,0.00008190026,0.0000066887183,0.38418853,0.57805514,0.00018914383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029702028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89230716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86260515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041379826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116344765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405588948","doi":"10.7202/1115109ar","title":"Relic of a Bygone Era? A Comparative Review of the Defence of “Reasonable Correction” in Canadian and Israeli Criminal Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Criminal code; Jurisdiction; Section (typography); Charter; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Dignity; High Court; Criminal law","score_opus":0.06197593593849592,"score_gpt":0.357827525335634,"score_spread":0.29585158939713807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405588948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032157823,0.975531,6.6371604e-7,0.000296404,0.00023887474,0.00074085477,0.000075245014,0.000006227835,0.022789145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0128387045,0.98587584,0.000048921178,0.00008021654,0.00006174914,0.000052222666,0.0000066946573,0.000012881233,0.0010227802],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979949,0.00038753313,0.0007105174,0.00029296504,0.00026303894,0.00035103038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986001,0.00032474633,0.00043474606,0.00031399974,0.00015908944,0.00016731776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012552341,0.00016200566,0.0013827146,0.00012681022,0.000109454624,0.000018052287,0.00046089035,0.00016844209,0.000048054775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043290472,0.00015934407,0.00032734152,0.00094278826,0.00060239236,0.000093439936,0.000070815906,0.00039798007,0.000010022345],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016487793,0.000116035175,0.00034941037,0.6440788,0.00014865132,0.000054955795,0.012317096,0.0000034574794,0.000002350098,0.21212818,0.013063439,0.117721155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030081816,0.000037722195,0.000060764105,0.28684977,0.0009593472,0.00005502589,0.0006213411,0.000008220439,0.0000025246845,0.0009933274,0.7102209,0.00016101028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.569293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6763462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69715744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044905278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019933751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6497863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405596258","doi":"10.2307/jj.22247014.15","title":"Saskatchewan Penitentiary","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa | University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03250919055961949,"score_gpt":0.24054436972596713,"score_spread":0.20803517916634764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405596258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025035362,0.0014555703,0.0003872878,0.00048913655,0.00027690054,0.0005476626,0.00025179647,0.00022925447,0.99611205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07386925,0.0021451067,0.00072591455,0.00003857422,0.00025975972,4.3697898e-7,0.00005507876,0.00007045442,0.9228354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969084,0.0002064561,0.00034240304,0.00083728693,0.0009434513,0.00076199207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642944,0.0003214892,0.0010593167,0.001195574,0.00049390545,0.0005002682],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051042496,0.0005871828,0.00083521043,0.00027953484,0.0023789955,0.00017172389,0.0032220287,0.001067246,0.0030582007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062831416,0.0007931406,0.0006467237,0.000014812312,0.0023229318,0.0005600681,0.000919766,0.0008361975,0.00006358801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004196959,0.00013458924,0.0007041792,0.0010675585,0.0011588234,0.0027023947,0.044595446,0.000042098916,0.0003208923,0.62615585,0.26065075,0.062047727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058563304,0.000084140236,0.00029638095,0.00062393333,0.000931136,0.000014041089,0.0044947253,0.0000081188755,0.00016446157,0.0027076323,0.9893189,0.0007708798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09473479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09182102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72866815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003876352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079869304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405970048","doi":"10.29173/wclawr120","title":"Wrongful Convictions and Prosecutions in Latin America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Latin Americans; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04359108180642501,"score_gpt":0.3651545631520995,"score_spread":0.3215634813456745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405970048","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010394813,0.44174758,0.0008193018,0.26643056,0.0021641704,0.0034900487,0.000045705936,0.00082266406,0.27408513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700744,0.123569675,0.000071414244,0.002950108,0.0002592756,0.00021394377,0.000008994734,0.000016962,0.0028352283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984983,0.00037431243,0.0003259219,0.0002795171,0.00024720634,0.00027473705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992369,0.00031208797,0.000056194625,0.00022968794,0.000070960494,0.00009417441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010164782,0.00012913105,0.0002229177,0.00004444294,0.0006799413,0.00016549093,0.00017682796,0.00005633531,0.0007872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014829094,0.00009602422,0.00007600534,0.00075244164,0.00069655536,0.00037681137,0.000047112728,0.0002765062,0.00042127038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003894587,0.000023568984,0.0001606801,0.00061859936,0.000017028346,0.000007004283,0.0027079373,0.0000033065082,0.000023400473,0.9701865,0.007970779,0.018277306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045057826,0.000023802164,0.00063857745,0.0018200394,0.000087739034,0.000011470968,0.0006799555,0.00010207346,0.0000032137557,0.001817012,0.99464947,0.00012157609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083096875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006994311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011653782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012702277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406144377","doi":"10.59992/ijlrs.2024.v3n6p1","title":"The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in Canadian law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Majallah al-dawlīyah lil-buḥūth wa-al-dirāsāt al-qānūnīyah =","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Rules of evidence; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04245483583098457,"score_gpt":0.34638967081809247,"score_spread":0.3039348349871079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406144377","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31081852,0.03957251,0.00004282597,0.43346992,0.007774543,0.0029312563,0.00036199205,0.0008893778,0.20413904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697232,0.0056221285,0.00034395952,0.012967743,0.0005012105,0.00015157048,0.000032394164,0.00011739145,0.010540362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909308,0.0009599422,0.0014870783,0.0017809505,0.0022481014,0.002593111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352324,0.0028380065,0.0002931134,0.0015646949,0.00050228636,0.0012786502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069250506,0.0007552175,0.00086959475,0.0005098121,0.0023908655,0.00085765345,0.00238826,0.00041766872,0.0010617004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002167642,0.0006250911,0.00053189613,0.002101154,0.0019381898,0.0016256983,0.00056470925,0.0011995721,0.0008712343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043583743,0.0003216106,0.009008655,0.00037311224,0.00024745305,0.0014737933,0.02905432,0.00017050169,0.004481616,0.28019074,0.6518816,0.022360794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032033975,0.00016577324,0.0041613313,0.0012884398,0.00008303085,0.000037277667,0.004517868,0.00070282,0.0002921014,0.0036991294,0.9839114,0.0008205068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7066921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8592569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65890473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013407425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029549655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406310853","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9185","title":"No-Fault, Motor Vehicle Accidents, and The Civil Resolution Tribunal: Effective Justice or False Prophet?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"American Bar Foundation","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Fault (geology); Political science; Resolution (logic); Law; Humanities; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Seismology; Geology","score_opus":0.03893748772347299,"score_gpt":0.3611627251944742,"score_spread":0.3222252374710012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406310853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8260526,0.012453824,0.0023721936,0.032911964,0.006998969,0.009798888,0.00014300125,0.00078705174,0.108481534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904365,0.00046329407,0.00017777979,0.000559279,0.0011651688,0.00014869738,0.0000015497793,0.000025542191,0.007022217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978349,0.00037847165,0.00031734022,0.00042062195,0.0006478934,0.00040072456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972419,0.0019191626,0.00010003109,0.000266294,0.00028370586,0.00018889162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016805963,0.00017546322,0.00028340524,0.000112044116,0.0005235781,0.00056035566,0.0006699646,0.00011847257,0.00019570978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034294054,0.00011837103,0.000089599336,0.0005547891,0.000507737,0.0009078716,0.00028506163,0.00026202083,0.00020875123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048860613,0.0012601468,0.0032730808,0.02300848,0.0013419414,0.0008423505,0.1560443,0.0017821143,0.020268116,0.30636874,0.2784119,0.15853822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044011683,0.0015325584,0.04520249,0.004500828,0.007823634,0.000034010067,0.015726047,0.008640616,0.0021907007,0.004623455,0.90375584,0.0015686374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038977456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018606664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.625344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011978262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002365489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5892252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406323765","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v39.9017","title":"Introduction: Harnessing the Untapped Potential of the Canadian Charter/Réaliser le potentiel inexploité de la Charte canadienne","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Humanities; Art; Law","score_opus":0.026606116428856158,"score_gpt":0.2964037499439292,"score_spread":0.269797633515073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406323765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51956373,0.0045332117,0.0002394638,0.44755197,0.010228278,0.0006363053,0.00010889279,0.000039317583,0.017098837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814665,0.0001432798,0.00005102639,0.0008578238,0.0036777777,0.000016825552,0.000002324271,0.00002892513,0.013755528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771947,0.0004314367,0.00037951497,0.00036583305,0.00043086708,0.00067291094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986866,0.00018781977,0.00013925046,0.00042611416,0.00021197424,0.0003482048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012516074,0.00019588532,0.00024682592,0.00014266181,0.0008823097,0.00053118466,0.0011752214,0.00018775872,0.0006497104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028968824,0.00015148608,0.00016716786,0.000949016,0.0011478629,0.00074829755,0.00018450517,0.00042889305,0.00005392377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023153213,0.00031141678,0.0014989336,0.0042527877,0.000625879,0.00028758094,0.1141332,0.0065438338,0.017309625,0.43278268,0.34972063,0.072301924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001775199,0.00006120364,0.021197308,0.0010953958,0.0011992133,0.00005885619,0.010730578,0.0010147117,0.0020801965,0.0018448698,0.96018934,0.0003508037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8175602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69608426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61046875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037663506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025466022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71138734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406326532","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v40.9067","title":"Un rond dans un carré: l’expérience professionnelle des spécialistes de la justice réparatrice dans le cadre d’un programme québécois de déjudiciarisation pour adultes","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04081260786727914,"score_gpt":0.34879418418495695,"score_spread":0.3079815763176778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406326532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346016,0.014196275,0.014103622,0.009447129,0.0016367827,0.0010344553,0.00007945072,0.00024097829,0.02465973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846441,0.0010323238,0.008244687,0.00043131204,0.0017423172,0.0001344708,0.000008633132,0.00007892831,0.0036832173],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950744,0.0011577226,0.0007471967,0.000856793,0.0008840754,0.0012798219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960109,0.0021798578,0.00030945378,0.00043730353,0.00044309575,0.0006194118],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024249887,0.00047090076,0.0004996286,0.00019832188,0.0014965805,0.0007291305,0.0014896081,0.00050267205,0.00030305274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002352314,0.00049630925,0.0002194589,0.0018151116,0.0015764183,0.0016784959,0.0004038422,0.0006678637,0.00012221679],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003585877,0.0013576781,0.02210214,0.007767578,0.00030965183,0.0006987735,0.7110627,0.0035061634,0.017884225,0.14647904,0.0071638734,0.08130958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014324432,0.00088417396,0.1186844,0.010015971,0.011383314,0.0002647213,0.6832451,0.007447764,0.08246898,0.03513413,0.046263717,0.0027752474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20240186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023149561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1792523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080941996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028290192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406981158","doi":"10.1525/collabra.127729","title":"Harm Is Key to Judgments That Stealing Is Immoral","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collabra Psychology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Key (lock); Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10823863255613063,"score_gpt":0.4681381670086949,"score_spread":0.3598995344525643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406981158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4153238,0.0005778475,0.0004903215,0.2186499,0.00394785,0.00048095244,0.000020092832,0.00010394885,0.3604053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89860845,0.00012492274,0.0005566113,0.05573764,0.0001714184,0.000031382046,0.0000013242214,0.000008249914,0.044759978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985978,0.000118803946,0.00018247013,0.00041599176,0.00024093516,0.0004440243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929804,0.00008819941,0.000048668684,0.00032737578,0.00008961046,0.00014812185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004374609,0.00011304143,0.00019088495,0.0001232748,0.00044242927,0.00009298794,0.00048502014,0.00014469452,0.0015132934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009204099,0.00011925629,0.000063376545,0.00061162625,0.0001696999,0.0001228718,0.00009045551,0.000115962976,0.0006924694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001046532,0.00006768483,0.01140538,0.000014663642,0.00002925822,0.000013043873,0.01768102,9.681287e-7,0.00030315277,0.016509345,0.9349965,0.018874342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002708721,0.000057081445,0.009119356,0.000047389552,0.000020133257,8.3347044e-7,0.0024596783,0.0000027965316,0.0004491091,0.0030893546,0.9843485,0.0001349163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013726492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009771398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48328468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091104535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013047387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407032580","doi":"10.17159/wh71jh46","title":"DOUBLE INCHOATE CRIMES: SERVING A USEFUL PURPOSE OR DOUBLE TROUBLE? Déry v The Queen; Attorney General of Canada et al, Interveners [2007] 213 CCC (3d) 289 (SCC)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Law; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05560598496038626,"score_gpt":0.3316085947277179,"score_spread":0.27600260976733165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407032580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93804467,0.0004367806,0.000021549733,0.033909924,0.0016525798,0.0005597469,0.00004867335,0.00006586937,0.02526018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522987,0.00006669925,0.00018392004,0.011833467,0.00019944033,0.00013666444,0.00001607513,0.00003287704,0.035232138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734414,0.00036569507,0.0004231641,0.00039412285,0.0008490367,0.00062384777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881846,0.00020061905,0.00020762485,0.0004603534,0.0001324303,0.00018052295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001469688,0.00020909884,0.00028549373,0.00006420506,0.00095679663,0.00017641962,0.00096409884,0.00005229449,0.0034069007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004143606,0.00015526309,0.00014461145,0.00037888705,0.00019098732,0.00045253476,0.00049037475,0.00036357503,0.000014494382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018330156,0.00021922277,0.014268838,0.00012701414,0.00014426495,0.00015119728,0.027284326,0.0016022983,0.00075107504,0.01836234,0.93448055,0.0007758805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091722154,0.00010020296,0.0010811558,0.000050763567,0.000043772772,0.0000075817534,0.005214321,0.00007996168,0.00051132526,0.00010858955,0.9916216,0.00026347677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.871536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7716795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09985644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005515502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001633754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407363729","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5115311","title":"Who Holds the Keys? Section 473 and the Prosecutor's Gatekeeper Role in Canadian Murder Trials","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Political science; Criminology; Law; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.013071561637972873,"score_gpt":0.3139514537365709,"score_spread":0.30087989209859806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407363729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77470446,0.020391505,0.00016514694,0.16778444,0.0010846931,0.0009425226,0.0000020067682,0.000022913326,0.034902338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868562,0.005885813,0.000001577691,0.00055038295,0.00051037344,0.00001714434,2.498644e-7,0.0000047882136,0.006173473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969316,0.001025103,0.00026479023,0.00013250766,0.00022605892,0.0014199073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928206,0.00036705093,0.000093089475,0.00010318738,0.000067020206,0.0000875915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016362585,0.00008720832,0.00019570721,0.00010040738,0.0012646811,0.00027495073,0.0002913676,0.00008993543,0.000038056278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009164518,0.00004874653,0.00008272414,0.00033256086,0.00027744146,0.00020010635,0.000019742572,0.0011314168,0.000004385188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017256425,0.000013606694,0.0063835657,0.000004167004,0.0000725506,0.0000023312327,0.012521386,0.00003181669,0.00003782322,0.9529309,0.0013282592,0.026501026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015115902,0.00008041056,0.007620659,0.00008865606,0.00011346497,0.00005068101,0.059451766,0.00013756809,0.000028475391,0.5422148,0.38852373,0.00017820072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5992102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97727656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41071612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010806415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00568366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407875552","doi":"10.5771/9780810881037-97","title":"Appendix E: Ponemon Institute / Information Privacy Commissioner of Ontario Corporate Privacy Comparisons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Computer security; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10363709070819088,"score_gpt":0.2787781041707814,"score_spread":0.17514101346259053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407875552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013453418,0.00008825204,0.000318555,0.001322904,0.0013914183,0.0007426144,0.000022743752,0.00014349606,0.9946247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14956163,0.000020343903,0.0008168342,0.0005453665,0.0003226391,0.00002262633,0.0003181401,0.000045182333,0.84834725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969674,0.000071387956,0.0010395702,0.00041394125,0.0009582524,0.0005494899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966552,0.00010692988,0.0014421161,0.0008974218,0.00046625602,0.000432057],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008163494,0.0004811686,0.00074240484,0.0003437592,0.00057707226,0.0006396283,0.0013803648,0.0008681422,0.0039314986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001795227,0.00048146895,0.0003282511,0.000053927382,0.00077132444,0.0025053807,0.00042049258,0.0010943821,0.0003601414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107495995,0.000029302173,0.0005014915,0.00013156733,0.00009976483,0.000012086577,0.037638918,0.0000013380078,0.0000036157314,0.7454818,0.20722158,0.008771024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027339195,0.00009638465,0.0002870256,0.00039081776,0.00013288127,0.0000035105431,0.00043496894,0.0000013299838,0.000030666437,0.037276708,0.96057075,0.0005015689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061835904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7533492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048684355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025513326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932888","doi":"10.21991/cf29483","title":"Negating Positive Rights: A Note on Mathur v Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01889805905399201,"score_gpt":0.3111670329715735,"score_spread":0.2922689739175815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016759615,0.00028022664,0.03877582,0.033011664,0.0036628055,0.00086268823,0.00013137715,0.000303987,0.9062118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871791,0.000015487698,0.0011218128,0.0035444396,0.0001702624,0.00007071244,0.00004776992,0.0000050673425,0.007845327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971721,0.00012801087,0.0005232909,0.0006088045,0.0006724617,0.0008953316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829495,0.00056414364,0.00015434148,0.00032074985,0.00041458182,0.0002512307],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053171,0.0003237017,0.00033984464,0.00028721476,0.0052092485,0.00025414745,0.00047700966,0.00026376513,0.0005621839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067978754,0.00031753976,0.00025718493,0.00054177846,0.006548985,0.0007951825,0.00014578122,0.0004774489,0.0005226323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110750065,0.00011976121,0.004416368,0.000010319762,0.000049670685,0.000059305075,0.00070186617,0.0001654735,0.000054714517,0.98238504,0.010911477,0.0010152801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008329697,0.00006738675,0.0012761876,0.000815696,0.0000885247,0.000031907402,0.0022010885,0.00007811327,0.0003330173,0.17103776,0.82276285,0.00047452553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05538038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21822171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001569002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00543494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407941842","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5151429","title":"Irrelevant and Invasive Police Inquisitions Into the Sexual History of Sexual Assault Complainants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Sexual history; Psychology; History; Medicine; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.024372074015359336,"score_gpt":0.3170149604945873,"score_spread":0.2926428864792279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407941842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96843165,0.010710117,0.0007041895,0.010844996,0.0005247156,0.0001641854,0.0000023931393,0.000020402942,0.00859736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886069,0.0023809513,0.000030378715,0.00030406596,0.0001868056,0.0000036977335,8.5190914e-7,0.0000051390302,0.0084811915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806446,0.0002818454,0.00023382613,0.0001500358,0.0003458865,0.00092391844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907726,0.00040288956,0.00013916109,0.00012425777,0.00018691705,0.000069525726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002275183,0.00009515523,0.00015395324,0.00009361576,0.0007657263,0.000035827787,0.00034579047,0.000077252145,0.000022874181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028722582,0.000073188006,0.00003121018,0.00018342953,0.0006843167,0.00020067435,0.00006406962,0.00097466086,0.000005818598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073636176,0.000084526575,0.0026828863,0.000037436588,0.0001356699,0.0000032833552,0.07789178,0.000008076721,0.002005971,0.88552237,0.005776316,0.02577806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008541986,0.0009074406,0.007466845,0.00016806788,0.0003408044,0.00016874376,0.56337,0.000045583587,0.00008067916,0.24417129,0.18202776,0.00039858907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033743396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23636648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64135104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018392546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007024815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407968524","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5153998","title":"The Puzzle and Promise of Human Dignity: R v Bissonnette","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013831293519551925,"score_gpt":0.33014680202469926,"score_spread":0.31631550850514734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407968524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265413,0.015084835,0.0002110604,0.02977684,0.00021546004,0.00020864408,7.0223416e-7,0.000021375497,0.027939739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823055,0.005603571,0.0000048468432,0.000042675907,0.00009889088,0.0000022568233,9.606968e-8,0.0000027711426,0.011939362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985966,0.00012631986,0.0001503077,0.00008044456,0.00018176527,0.00086452713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996073,0.00011970891,0.00008140615,0.000079816564,0.00007014512,0.000041585317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026149722,0.00005186656,0.00008588021,0.00003467667,0.001649098,0.00008946941,0.00024502512,0.000035072906,0.0000083191535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020073957,0.00003601259,0.000043456446,0.00014503644,0.00027701503,0.000113008035,0.00003202513,0.0005242086,0.0000016888565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018993866,0.000015149719,0.002280771,0.0000057874145,0.000040994448,4.717213e-7,0.0009185614,2.8999784e-7,0.00040066792,0.97517717,0.00039047803,0.020750646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002577048,0.00013809184,0.0018281001,0.000056158995,0.00007312117,0.000011939848,0.014269165,0.0000045979664,0.00024240183,0.83479166,0.14824389,0.00008317823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009631103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025151283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1478534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014356327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010218655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407970801","doi":"10.1515/9782760327689-002","title":"Affidavit présenté dans le cadre de la plainte devant la Cour fédérale du Commissaire aux langues officielles du Canada visant les compressions budgétaires de Cbef Windsor","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Humanities; Art; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.022008492082505923,"score_gpt":0.24618032965380474,"score_spread":0.22417183757129883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407970801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1572068,0.0006395892,0.0006004215,0.001733308,0.00030070392,0.0004151863,0.00059491384,0.000103510014,0.83840555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003235,0.00028195113,0.0004023191,0.00006733039,0.00027738351,6.8353455e-7,0.000022705563,0.000039951457,0.19858417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971371,0.00073032826,0.0003337121,0.00051042915,0.00064864126,0.0006397599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718016,0.0012118659,0.00044366645,0.00040631217,0.00030645172,0.00045154462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065249053,0.00046864236,0.0006272465,0.00008550344,0.002044961,0.00007526628,0.0012950497,0.00058080273,0.0005102437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119708595,0.0005301709,0.00028476366,0.000023720768,0.0049819383,0.00013355115,0.0004814252,0.00056253717,0.000007930921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020848711,0.00022182774,0.004697099,0.0004521847,0.00039247135,0.0016711359,0.047025107,0.00038303077,0.00083209167,0.8392255,0.10259632,0.0022947593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047511334,0.00009842195,0.0016100061,0.001189767,0.00037640784,0.00007581607,0.019964099,0.00041418278,0.001031641,0.00034005303,0.9738629,0.0005616292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9374558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87126654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053054007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027505613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407988223","doi":"10.1515/9782760327689-004","title":"Affidavit présenté dans le cadre de la plainte devant la Cour fédérale du Commissaire aux langues officielles du Canada visant les compressions budgétaires de Cbef Windsor","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Political science; Humanities; Art; Geology","score_opus":0.022008492082505923,"score_gpt":0.24618032965380474,"score_spread":0.22417183757129883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407988223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1572068,0.0006395892,0.0006004215,0.001733308,0.00030070392,0.0004151863,0.00059491384,0.000103510014,0.83840555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003235,0.00028195113,0.0004023191,0.00006733039,0.00027738351,6.8353455e-7,0.000022705563,0.000039951457,0.19858417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971371,0.00073032826,0.0003337121,0.00051042915,0.00064864126,0.0006397599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718016,0.0012118659,0.00044366645,0.00040631217,0.00030645172,0.00045154462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065249053,0.00046864236,0.0006272465,0.00008550344,0.002044961,0.00007526628,0.0012950497,0.00058080273,0.0005102437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119708595,0.0005301709,0.00028476366,0.000023720768,0.0049819383,0.00013355115,0.0004814252,0.00056253717,0.000007930921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020848711,0.00022182774,0.004697099,0.0004521847,0.00039247135,0.0016711359,0.047025107,0.00038303077,0.00083209167,0.8392255,0.10259632,0.0022947593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047511334,0.00009842195,0.0016100061,0.001189767,0.00037640784,0.00007581607,0.019964099,0.00041418278,0.001031641,0.00034005303,0.9738629,0.0005616292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9587162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9374558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87126654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053054007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027505613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408050539","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5159223","title":"Negating Positive Rights: A Note on Mathur v Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009961321501835698,"score_gpt":0.3076634782958994,"score_spread":0.2977021567940637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408050539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67391914,0.00078165636,0.0024914716,0.018132081,0.00080481777,0.0002251655,0.0000012354811,0.00006480191,0.3035796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674111,0.00020468212,0.00007965396,0.00044096628,0.00026208127,0.0000025459503,5.0528377e-7,0.000004713571,0.031593766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758226,0.00014317404,0.00018851383,0.00016648187,0.00032583336,0.0015937155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994733,0.0001735297,0.000090942274,0.00009142951,0.000095144176,0.00007566062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016281637,0.00010402816,0.0001309706,0.00008652466,0.0013812218,0.00014890872,0.00029464104,0.00007490113,0.0000925725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013119292,0.00008950554,0.000103074686,0.00020358393,0.00009483446,0.00023353368,0.000024175544,0.001556092,0.00006729871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006007559,0.000033025208,0.0004135017,0.0000014801801,0.000035522775,0.000011484593,0.005101751,0.000004492251,0.000044817705,0.9834412,0.00033682535,0.010515865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030153955,0.00024558586,0.0014864753,0.00019729797,0.00005452108,0.000030950483,0.0054654498,0.000007517054,0.0001307852,0.904707,0.087205745,0.00016710754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14529783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8399993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6947015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038749683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005739162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092874","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1451","title":"A Lifeline During Custodial Interrogations? The Right to Counsel and Reflections on R. v. Dussault and R. v. Lafrance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to counsel; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.05705271651545326,"score_gpt":0.3901966772321616,"score_spread":0.3331439607167084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04051562,0.41125804,0.00021035896,0.48311484,0.0018327421,0.0023107072,0.000049522172,0.00040264602,0.060305495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88496464,0.106646456,0.00010889805,0.004886158,0.0006617811,0.00009868564,0.0000024169535,0.000013843164,0.0026171023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989322,0.00014972812,0.0001993695,0.00026369144,0.00026017212,0.00019485512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993841,0.00021290184,0.000026117372,0.00016933943,0.00008636404,0.00012115798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082776527,0.00010676726,0.00016883534,0.000025082474,0.0008849972,0.00018830877,0.00014327091,0.00003972047,0.00015068361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022692955,0.0000724269,0.00005046799,0.00028971137,0.000258987,0.00020229103,0.000030134668,0.0001827182,0.00011833204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042055854,0.00005717261,0.0000628699,0.0032892483,0.00006104429,0.00004450221,0.011286468,0.0000059295803,0.0005516956,0.8900047,0.08167868,0.012915625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037024663,0.000031691525,0.00008103328,0.0040451805,0.00006422579,0.000014042594,0.00013655928,0.000007698577,0.000027756334,0.0008404333,0.9946162,0.00009815289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010287041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015132765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051894196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058753445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8444438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408589153","doi":"10.5040/9781509970087.ch-004","title":"Making and Re-Making of Public Law: The Canadian Way","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1182034056314279,"score_gpt":0.3762835084232998,"score_spread":0.2580801027918719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408589153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000033332133,0.0009569218,0.000019469375,0.014453538,0.00019706218,0.00011916205,0.000006697356,0.000029471685,0.98421437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41582826,0.0000701448,0.00010788481,0.0009811695,0.00012950036,0.0000025154297,5.0763583e-7,0.000018118944,0.5828619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926156,0.000088609595,0.00008833464,0.00013806195,0.00019209737,0.00023132186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996062,0.00009262922,0.00006556212,0.00014994004,0.000035687644,0.000049977803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054463523,0.00007411592,0.00012132976,0.00009044367,0.00042891377,0.00014999909,0.00028833078,0.0001485807,0.0036900854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016518985,0.00005193354,0.000032228054,0.00013098799,0.00037706573,0.000044227356,0.000043061395,0.00010124982,0.000011361939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1690865e-7,0.0000010788667,0.00014424206,0.000022601043,0.000008613276,0.0000016281451,0.0008669705,2.1655998e-8,1.1663589e-7,0.7909158,0.20350385,0.0045348657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010761105,0.0000025609995,0.00006485817,0.00023565008,0.000014635895,1.729703e-7,0.002244965,9.4249884e-7,3.6401977e-7,0.0017665916,0.9955943,0.000064184074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9414993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99937224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7920905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070537855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005709463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408669280","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.440","title":"Police operational independence and the rule of law in Canada: Improving police governance and accountability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Accountability; Corporate governance; Rule of law; Law; Political science; Business; Public administration; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.012645489495890044,"score_gpt":0.28788595923725674,"score_spread":0.2752404697413667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408669280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712296,0.0005438497,0.00004261537,0.009485334,0.000071206014,0.00007906239,0.000002737888,0.000001418425,0.018544191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761057,0.0012434308,0.000056085246,0.0010155003,0.000034278182,5.0184184e-7,1.6086827e-7,0.0000017965824,0.000037652553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985721,0.0005853452,0.00036811203,0.000052255094,0.00028639796,0.00013575141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978309,0.0016419948,0.00020615454,0.000116420386,0.00014905844,0.000055446184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032996945,0.00006969116,0.00022148078,0.000024212639,0.00088082085,0.000062995605,0.00027838905,0.000046822086,0.000008179955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021376596,0.000053928994,0.000023581026,0.000121829056,0.0005492678,0.00047516165,0.00017113728,0.00057645317,4.5397325e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009713832,0.00007199734,0.12458703,0.00025617075,0.00004478663,0.0000021088497,0.20152687,0.00012820197,0.0002200907,0.6604674,0.00007680341,0.011647202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017755249,0.00005218778,0.8881501,0.00060977833,0.000061534214,0.000034862416,0.078689046,0.0002924678,0.000240648,0.01818058,0.011731086,0.00018217691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99408257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98656946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7635631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018891093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008193428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6774651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408720570","doi":"10.1515/9780776645285-013","title":"À PROPOS DE LA REVUE DE DROIT D’OTTAWA","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026274456709677756,"score_gpt":0.2513519874385374,"score_spread":0.22507753072885966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408720570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007369166,0.00041532077,0.001089921,0.0010010551,0.0002650262,0.00040447977,0.000096449396,0.00007355509,0.99591726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10752061,0.0004962815,0.0028204776,0.00006830028,0.0001975895,5.287998e-7,0.0000053866415,0.00002125423,0.8888696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980145,0.00032409656,0.00028023266,0.00049596396,0.00036521495,0.00051996025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793446,0.0007268509,0.00037322738,0.00042237452,0.00026448054,0.00027862465],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088714104,0.00031103537,0.00051475834,0.00013267568,0.0006447673,0.00004581709,0.0010982838,0.00077500934,0.0005493351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001579866,0.00044648358,0.0003287831,0.000029474366,0.0028607906,0.00014067128,0.00030064269,0.00059441983,0.00003381219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045744055,0.000038796366,0.00018527156,0.00089941005,0.00012452005,0.00031176984,0.006242669,0.000026399573,0.00005881458,0.9769576,0.007680588,0.0074283844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028157965,0.00008651339,0.00013381752,0.0016998315,0.00054464187,0.000017817301,0.0006803247,0.000055999422,0.00026347526,0.013442669,0.9823926,0.00040074924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0468643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115738595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056128576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010092721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408815946","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5172476","title":"Message Undeliverable: An Empirical Assessment of the (Un)Readability of Canadian Court Decisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Political science; Programming language","score_opus":0.05637727611359311,"score_gpt":0.3973884611788661,"score_spread":0.341011185065273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408815946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89797604,0.003080762,0.0031539816,0.03557656,0.0015961537,0.0008278891,0.00018162333,0.000025177414,0.057581834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093145,0.0071842857,0.00034221052,0.00009889406,0.00012653893,0.0000055448436,0.0000037164898,0.0000072961097,0.0013000505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957358,0.001001264,0.0005639205,0.00030913422,0.0009026585,0.001487222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977895,0.00043153146,0.00041425478,0.000563134,0.0005316869,0.0002699021],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071365437,0.00017998333,0.00040953708,0.0002665492,0.00084401085,0.000068319845,0.0015796007,0.00030411102,0.00018068947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006962009,0.00013701347,0.0003073861,0.0005605925,0.00040656628,0.00010622127,0.00025621214,0.00335971,7.3383404e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007184206,0.0005822516,0.108546324,0.00009421514,0.0005726377,0.000008432211,0.0067419196,0.0018115345,0.000054905,0.82555866,0.0034503534,0.052506927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018734223,0.0002275064,0.047374487,0.0005958299,0.00044144908,0.000022721653,0.018808715,0.00029896188,0.000065124616,0.9074849,0.02411928,0.00037367415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49484926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9549293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46008003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033756327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06976344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409006058","doi":"10.59962/9780774870672-007","title":"5 Narrating the After of the Moment of Redress: Fred Kelly’s “Confession of a Born Again Pagan” and Roy Miki’s Redress: Inside the Japanese Canadian Call for Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Confession (law); Economic Justice; Moment (physics); Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.0214757962150913,"score_gpt":0.22338134513550942,"score_spread":0.20190554892041812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409006058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1501291,0.0037159692,0.000023821045,0.001898282,0.0007562815,0.004887831,0.00556931,0.000031233893,0.8329882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6494696,0.0002531912,0.000060871378,0.00008270823,0.000040545594,0.0000037260738,0.000004814155,0.000011417912,0.3500731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843377,0.00019715338,0.00035496824,0.00029307586,0.0004690559,0.00025198876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790144,0.00047740192,0.00056677766,0.0004210231,0.00053129526,0.00010208135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006509125,0.0001267234,0.0004183719,0.000041218846,0.0006795596,0.000050943956,0.000819871,0.00027462564,0.000041192216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017256594,0.00014676794,0.00020576888,0.000025363788,0.0016734193,0.00006652107,0.00030766317,0.00025425488,6.58604e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015367343,0.00023289847,0.0015834427,0.011348946,0.001684971,0.00030076594,0.41651246,0.000091582806,0.0007860345,0.0513266,0.42076296,0.0938326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019155435,0.000324809,0.0079225665,0.020313457,0.0029141135,0.000016113774,0.08298041,0.00017383663,0.00015082094,0.0041612266,0.878232,0.0008951048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9424251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98459333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49934056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010788464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075947755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081068","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1490","title":"Probative of Prejudice: Procedural Unfairness Underlying Security Threat Group Classifications in Canadian Prisons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06450815909641282,"score_gpt":0.4076119381828813,"score_spread":0.34310377908646844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7655705,0.00033048796,0.000044495177,0.10857496,0.00017475037,0.0003589918,0.000017904702,0.000009993252,0.12491787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989907,0.00009869857,0.00004176298,0.0005068637,0.0002034003,0.0000040259547,6.3833386e-7,0.0000032210637,0.00015067935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998983,0.00014801515,0.00031860225,0.000084979285,0.0001945344,0.00027084808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993276,0.000093447925,0.000201439,0.00004168867,0.00020452269,0.00013132904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006640577,0.00006976038,0.00021765596,0.00019360457,0.00060733064,0.000055237466,0.00016958789,0.000109027955,0.0000064997666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019796615,0.000066089524,0.000066605404,0.0004063392,0.00049604423,0.0003221461,0.000018527957,0.00020846052,3.9006582e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017017735,0.000041822674,0.0031619065,0.000052045107,0.000016702366,0.0000022079666,0.05907064,6.6453754e-7,0.000043043103,0.93658763,0.00037901336,0.0006273362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011925586,0.0002052265,0.18525693,0.00074404327,0.00016350065,0.000010221673,0.12700444,0.000033191976,0.0000910719,0.5828316,0.10209261,0.00037455052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6570143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87626344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35375595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040370284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023887558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4671158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409239273","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p106","title":"The Creation of an English Criminal Code: 6 Acts Third Act - State Crimes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); State (computer science); Criminology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.10812334661914991,"score_gpt":0.4942373070025287,"score_spread":0.3861139603833788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409239273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25743532,0.00012989162,0.00004007799,0.008294632,0.00070235546,0.00020502492,0.000021986041,0.000035958932,0.73313475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802305,0.0002354345,0.000085108535,0.00009805074,0.0002430432,0.00002149474,0.0000077898985,0.000004675239,0.019073872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974038,0.0005062123,0.00022340586,0.00020174932,0.0013493407,0.00031551372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961797,0.0016184045,0.000053728872,0.00020611034,0.0018598193,0.00008225778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037031146,0.00006343039,0.00008487207,0.000105761734,0.0009748602,0.00037525888,0.00096452585,0.000046707435,0.00012047781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021211205,0.000049637852,0.000049686198,0.00024589399,0.0010591036,0.00051998004,0.0001432059,0.00026373632,0.000022228303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019113018,0.00006944485,0.00055064907,0.000012345579,0.000024638211,0.0000041927065,0.0056210314,0.00001623362,0.00026264865,0.98314923,0.0026851376,0.0074132937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015237422,0.000081619255,0.0060395943,0.0000860485,0.000009700614,4.032378e-7,0.007265006,0.00018472469,0.0043813693,0.04307885,0.9386493,0.00007101377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015118922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027318357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017691385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004827031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409345272","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p139","title":"The Creation of a UK Criminal Code: 6 Acts Fourth Act – Weapons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Political science; Computer security; Criminology; Law; Business; Computer science; Criminal law; Sociology; Programming language","score_opus":0.14359065504143279,"score_gpt":0.5050186937625969,"score_spread":0.36142803872116414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409345272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04603626,0.00011274243,0.0002232588,0.045400172,0.00050339755,0.00020256605,0.000014866816,0.000017530752,0.9074892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658296,0.0002376539,0.000092894996,0.000083978404,0.0001652657,0.000026012725,0.0000038120975,0.000003282619,0.03355751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977981,0.0003451511,0.00018726784,0.00016015625,0.0012246883,0.00028465618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966505,0.0021097856,0.000045579298,0.0001697529,0.0009636135,0.000060741157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030185287,0.000052038195,0.0000728183,0.000104003164,0.0009910454,0.00021698262,0.0008146369,0.000055358476,0.00028656752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020872022,0.000040175284,0.000059570335,0.00028629092,0.0012800302,0.00016763448,0.00015525172,0.00022878346,0.00005005211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001213368,0.0000339362,0.0008906211,0.000007810804,0.000022885168,0.0000030604301,0.0009492684,0.0000059617428,0.0003979816,0.98829764,0.0043602926,0.004909189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012821183,0.000039969666,0.004003776,0.00010192857,0.000009110949,6.29119e-7,0.0026545282,0.00011937727,0.001554123,0.039259017,0.9520802,0.000049116912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011711065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027288537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9490386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019141148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055857364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409674518","doi":"10.3138/cjwl-05-x","title":"Left Wanting: A Case Comment on <i>R. v Kirkpatrick</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0309976237075008,"score_gpt":0.294895670142851,"score_spread":0.2638980464353502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409674518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5688492,0.0011448046,0.000032119966,0.30819196,0.0007855566,0.00020749858,0.000012017952,0.000008369719,0.120768465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977845,0.00015591206,0.000022443139,0.018365595,0.00018162589,0.0000025833674,3.002929e-7,0.000005931855,0.0034205741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877256,0.00025055604,0.00027829985,0.0001111185,0.00013003036,0.00045742054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985809,0.00048608164,0.00014593816,0.00014204826,0.00009900567,0.00054602517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024727057,0.0001006988,0.00026441095,0.00012702786,0.00087066565,0.0002367966,0.00029818274,0.00005647685,0.00008911469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003075578,0.000077650606,0.00009572585,0.00016929746,0.00050295226,0.00014414957,0.000021054015,0.00029501502,0.0000062781705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000707595,0.000013305842,0.0007714803,0.000026856696,0.000044144803,0.0012220222,0.043441467,0.000009353898,0.0000011191795,0.9408155,0.011402028,0.0021819454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008722543,0.000103594335,0.00012730586,0.00021496337,0.000048439073,0.0006798459,0.024848087,0.000010170765,0.000011290744,0.06515325,0.9078064,0.00012438574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062260687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23671027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8964044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042479346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076679816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409680646","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.70010","title":"The Quest for Regulating Crime Scene Investigation in Forensic Science: Can We Learn About Discretion and Standardization From Other Fields?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Forensic Science","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Technology Sydney","keywords":"Discretion; Standardization; Forensic science; Engineering ethics; Crime scene; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.041318856793865016,"score_gpt":0.378505258542524,"score_spread":0.337186401748659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409680646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8567828,0.026171584,0.032604095,0.06234173,0.004320352,0.0052703666,0.000060816077,0.00015278693,0.012295455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927963,0.0028603836,0.0033135996,0.00032700752,0.00016320214,0.0001178344,0.000005766047,0.000009522215,0.00040637422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725956,0.00019384468,0.0006114137,0.0007112353,0.0006348895,0.0005890735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837244,0.00043762353,0.00028195488,0.0004224679,0.0003296056,0.00015591514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058604637,0.00018950041,0.0003154338,0.00022765079,0.003473422,0.0005704816,0.0007312802,0.000067626584,0.000013528766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016531595,0.00013646374,0.00007984415,0.0017743843,0.005336603,0.0010745346,0.00038827423,0.00018147,0.000003961354],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097179036,0.000018526289,0.00968017,0.00013697043,0.0000065144013,0.0000010673584,0.03706938,0.000108398744,0.0020129173,0.0637044,0.0014447988,0.88571966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012041908,0.00047764715,0.050630327,0.020954393,0.00019429541,0.0000073103915,0.04739292,0.032729845,0.011520283,0.756651,0.07691102,0.0013267858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004487762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058866706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8843929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069083774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009756077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409689670","doi":"10.1177/00220183251336101","title":"The Criminal Cases Review Commission - A Quarter of a Century On","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Commission; Political science; Criminology; Law; History; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04902798316237291,"score_gpt":0.38338424633758017,"score_spread":0.3343562631752073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409689670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19577068,0.1841128,0.0001902456,0.21389335,0.0031486298,0.0010910521,0.000013482013,0.000040550647,0.4017392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781765,0.018776407,0.00003957643,0.0021193414,0.00018651219,0.0000017618408,1.8376602e-7,0.0000049047917,0.000694854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975741,0.00080812594,0.00057992584,0.00007823323,0.00070313417,0.00025647954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967653,0.0020187588,0.0004516441,0.0002784739,0.00038850727,0.00009730409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034361556,0.0001211481,0.00029668296,0.000043135813,0.0009993222,0.000053602864,0.0008016165,0.0000469213,0.000099501194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073973986,0.00005958051,0.00021540593,0.00019177717,0.0007727159,0.00016644508,0.00005259719,0.00034224865,0.000009175227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015518119,0.0002053477,0.000026094056,0.0009867534,0.00006677981,0.000092868206,0.009560271,0.0000052050773,0.0002524248,0.86719716,0.10061382,0.019441472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022241034,0.000762871,0.0003780907,0.007119669,0.0012048808,0.00018592003,0.02271175,0.000002531773,0.0006510422,0.005423435,0.9612187,0.00011870219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014363136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068509736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074820644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027265822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7686079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410456896","doi":"10.3917/dpo.008.0013","title":"Protection des données et sanction : une nécessaire quête d’effectivité","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DPO news","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15986708082407397,"score_gpt":0.32751352278703144,"score_spread":0.16764644196295747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410456896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57007796,0.0059997467,0.008889031,0.3821648,0.0025272719,0.00096009317,0.00001125595,0.00028629994,0.029083576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99274564,0.0011407528,0.00021356488,0.0014714478,0.0013492112,0.000056047586,0.0000028579254,0.000018424247,0.0030020701],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809504,0.00056898536,0.00021824024,0.0004068353,0.00033946533,0.0003714183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931914,0.00011774474,0.0001317989,0.00013078302,0.00008040515,0.00022013868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045777386,0.0001886083,0.00022323869,0.000027236312,0.0008693408,0.00021572906,0.00017009772,0.00017916897,0.00032470457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003520294,0.00019006626,0.00013733748,0.00086908066,0.00064078026,0.0009581114,0.000052597843,0.00030715755,0.0005570612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002671873,0.00019914682,0.0039282213,0.00094682083,0.00004840483,0.00003302403,0.07371914,0.00031816293,0.005334834,0.047938325,0.017335273,0.8499315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025662128,0.00055696105,0.008850253,0.00038764754,0.000089444395,0.000008165354,0.0065722642,0.00058090006,0.0014054112,0.007210219,0.9737529,0.0003291917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06604287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061720576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015014694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014162117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9554006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410626381","doi":"10.5040/9798881810528.ch-008","title":"Wrongful Convictions In Nigeria And Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.018855616314608893,"score_gpt":0.2814454182175364,"score_spread":0.26258980190292747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410626381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007071338,0.00024793216,0.0000048907646,0.007714593,0.00026009287,0.00008112754,0.0000088929755,0.000032941978,0.9915788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019904224,0.00036210005,0.00006401815,0.0005896267,0.00023133875,0.0000042902334,0.0000022481076,0.000029640827,0.9788125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957246,0.000028910994,0.000054364737,0.0001174397,0.0001184111,0.000108388565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998186,0.000031088766,0.000020299762,0.000044583147,0.000004028162,0.0000813788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000045823617,0.00005301519,0.00009471246,0.00002083553,0.0000551111,0.00002129398,0.00007215994,0.00006698459,0.008023184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003883888,0.000051271367,0.000008068945,0.000054327404,0.00007283496,0.000017021099,0.000015760634,0.00006489494,0.000020900985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5923636e-7,0.0000014516457,0.0013518328,0.00000873833,0.0000023042317,0.000009277933,0.0005290858,2.8110565e-8,4.99319e-7,0.008032524,0.98985213,0.00021154608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021882901,0.0000025938693,0.0002650963,0.000025153071,0.000002693535,1.7894962e-7,0.0025183822,4.3174137e-7,3.2209192e-7,0.000045557143,0.9970517,0.00006601057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01983351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005531505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005003513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785023","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0018","title":"Extensions of Term and Supplementary Protection Certificates","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.15581831881220876,"score_gpt":0.3144423831785037,"score_spread":0.15862406436629495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008309493,0.00025667957,0.00003500697,0.0025848795,0.00016149896,0.00046204438,0.00003472756,0.000029403851,0.9956048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35504723,0.001017806,0.00021017018,0.00005766682,0.00012660587,0.000010774446,0.000012011526,0.0000131627,0.64350456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939513,0.0000126519,0.00015910032,0.00016984988,0.00016008603,0.000103202125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996495,0.000030627947,0.00008769885,0.000113848946,0.000059121496,0.00005914918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016848225,0.00008794974,0.00013417553,0.000046919773,0.0001801465,0.000013309318,0.00008589259,0.00011506676,0.0072569763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015103251,0.00007543217,0.00004574091,0.0000097492575,0.00032986843,0.000058050726,0.000042265252,0.00008725016,0.000021700935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031898482,0.000020312315,0.0001288998,0.00008903992,0.000030778767,0.0000051132124,0.003650812,1.5422033e-8,0.0012590695,0.9490014,0.010342043,0.03544063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045427103,0.000088166074,0.00035788066,0.00016702508,0.00008918287,0.0000025025863,0.00050417194,3.265217e-7,0.000631621,0.059823908,0.9381053,0.00018452761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012281883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074088858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018778414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040493545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411088767","doi":"10.29173/wclawr125","title":"Reasons for Exoneration Among Fresh Evidence Cases in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.07574556604782746,"score_gpt":0.3660804613256722,"score_spread":0.29033489527784473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411088767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1352708,0.4455428,0.0016590741,0.32914218,0.0045715994,0.010052944,0.00005519588,0.00022975658,0.07347562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643799,0.030312648,0.000028773284,0.0037584961,0.00009470898,0.00024710692,0.000003935058,0.0000044899716,0.0011699084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986994,0.00036758962,0.00029395678,0.00019177013,0.00022527104,0.00022196102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838287,0.0010704943,0.00009870012,0.0002390888,0.00015928174,0.000049541206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014961399,0.00009090074,0.00020189593,0.000017452596,0.00060201896,0.000054449003,0.00025194246,0.00003325269,0.00016091924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013853542,0.0000706559,0.00005495071,0.00038107144,0.00016796094,0.00033911603,0.000025763757,0.00010489206,0.000009297947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036961428,0.000022848384,0.006308231,0.0017377903,0.000018277338,0.000010255283,0.0005317484,0.000049831106,0.000027842947,0.8645451,0.11215382,0.014557311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077119774,0.00001572411,0.0032273193,0.007134933,0.00010501316,0.0000022001743,0.00071147055,0.00006694227,0.00004326115,0.00056102953,0.98793036,0.00012460297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97468597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99842185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8757766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055566407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011316394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46303037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411542049","doi":"10.1162/99608f92.dc58eb7a","title":"Navigating the Privacy Landscape: Harmonizing Legislative and Public Sector Approaches in the Canadian Context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard Data Science Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Context (archaeology); Public sector; Political science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Public administration; Geography; Computer science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.35686093694706433,"score_gpt":0.4034727452268728,"score_spread":0.046611808279808487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411542049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022948308,0.16944475,0.00015806484,0.66641945,0.00062598573,0.0041793366,0.0001493271,0.000073297626,0.1360015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975378,0.01956181,0.0001636353,0.004750344,0.000051753068,0.00003864554,0.000012128486,0.000002597573,0.000041130468],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791986,0.00044433528,0.00022636486,0.0004199905,0.0005002242,0.0004892152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984381,0.00050085975,0.000085957516,0.0007567011,0.000084737214,0.00013360195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010528211,0.000097795026,0.0001769289,0.00004149961,0.002314687,0.0010141863,0.0028396745,0.000028629242,0.00007005289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046419185,0.000054877364,0.000023214348,0.0018464688,0.0013929738,0.0018091031,0.00039472766,0.00036115642,0.000034752506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016847774,0.00002513708,0.02183512,0.00054202636,0.00001041853,0.00001061011,0.03429788,3.0348832e-7,0.000006795792,0.3372995,0.015133374,0.5908371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037617014,0.0000041200065,0.004012678,0.0019380389,0.000021025038,0.0000037269951,0.010245635,0.00018479748,0.0000010707764,0.00034897562,0.98311496,0.00008737589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19449158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6467139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116735246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020931074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411871392","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105424","title":"Facilitating police reform: Body cameras, police-involved homicides, and law enforcement outcomes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Criminology; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.049416228047314534,"score_gpt":0.3407960028178037,"score_spread":0.29137977477048915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411871392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9066279,0.00027738337,0.00010429223,0.012188239,0.0004949636,0.00010156823,0.0000087732,0.000014403172,0.08018248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952122,0.0006318782,0.00065221515,0.0017871616,0.00019947886,0.0000020409782,0.0000012031279,0.0000060858133,0.0015077199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862534,0.000100609424,0.0006474812,0.00013739598,0.00012923706,0.00035994852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986839,0.00034850833,0.00041485176,0.00013939077,0.00018182672,0.0002315137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019196852,0.00012376455,0.0003390256,0.00017686008,0.00045098024,0.0003559078,0.0003542556,0.000084989486,0.00006200631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002198602,0.000110232504,0.00012735128,0.0001070779,0.0002561445,0.001073052,0.000090238864,0.00019858046,0.0000060733364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001758911,0.00003485924,0.024862494,0.0000304155,0.00011311903,9.54881e-7,0.010274181,0.000016055472,0.00003760484,0.95780385,0.0011162189,0.005692684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010984088,0.00017010739,0.010831043,0.00011848529,0.00010675822,0.000010952479,0.17549881,0.00021919791,0.00012908083,0.013317139,0.7981244,0.00037562865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12553191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080472074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007209634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005025071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9363069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411960152","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5335949","title":"L'article 33 de la Charte canadienne et le pouvoir déclaratoire du tribunal //&amp;nbsp;Section 33 of the Canadian Charter and the Declaratory Power of the Courts","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Charter; Humanities; Section (typography); Tribunal; Power (physics); Law; Philosophy; Physics; Business","score_opus":0.008735321097805449,"score_gpt":0.2513879126482933,"score_spread":0.24265259155048785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411960152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9078905,0.004431247,0.00011413429,0.08272472,0.0011544214,0.0003768079,0.000062184925,0.0000054414704,0.0032405267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926994,0.0028297561,0.00000623722,0.000780765,0.00029229614,0.000013658833,0.0000010075624,0.000013896076,0.0033629823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945379,0.0023373896,0.0005179328,0.00028453697,0.00046549566,0.0018567371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980978,0.0004007793,0.0005426404,0.00041014407,0.00029799962,0.00025068174],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009686361,0.0002608799,0.0003907829,0.000078303645,0.0020953876,0.0001424693,0.00096206204,0.00035474767,0.000066106455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044031825,0.00015847872,0.0003692983,0.00035625426,0.0019565665,0.00017823541,0.00017277198,0.0034892638,0.0000020682735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011803625,0.00006259584,0.008660431,0.000029185781,0.00026452472,0.000002342467,0.015712716,0.00020895858,0.00030820526,0.97167206,0.00092721253,0.0020337529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027702015,0.00021398484,0.119641155,0.0010132076,0.0008939881,0.00096394756,0.02672232,0.00041841253,0.00070681376,0.47177368,0.3742177,0.0006646058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67550015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49989834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026459289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03190697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411986273","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2025.06.006","title":"The need to implement better integrated and reasonably optimized protection strategy – One Protection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.05619275820073229,"score_gpt":0.3443051172662218,"score_spread":0.28811235906548954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411986273","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18372114,0.0015789383,0.27491313,0.52149606,0.0012267239,0.011648188,0.0000051144293,0.0003554234,0.0050552576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576986,0.00066495483,0.00026207796,0.00056233694,0.00045683866,0.0009388915,0.0000045574766,0.000007686933,0.0013328001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862236,0.00035133242,0.0002713264,0.00026104678,0.0002766177,0.00021732751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942356,0.000078147765,0.000111429305,0.0001099022,0.0001795194,0.00009743825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017097748,0.00011707982,0.00014767172,0.00016267084,0.0014142111,0.00013848423,0.000062275125,0.00010475315,0.000035398836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072138675,0.000085928754,0.000020551599,0.00061219226,0.0001249653,0.00019580782,0.000018649265,0.00022027499,0.0000036513518],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038399128,0.000016005979,0.00004137451,0.000049200265,0.000026961912,3.4184745e-7,0.0037629658,0.00006048845,0.0036528157,0.0050221053,0.0008455156,0.9861382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025671013,0.0017452217,0.0109234555,0.0006541869,0.00018984146,0.000009191112,0.029887134,0.010114382,0.0020740319,0.013401629,0.92801905,0.0004147912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026004286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003660385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98572344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017446511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011470486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412021662","doi":"10.22201/iij.24485306e.2025.1.19606","title":"Toward a New Regulation on the Exclusionary Rule. What Can Mexico Learn from American and Canadian Experiences?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04976149122974346,"score_gpt":0.32843880271412995,"score_spread":0.2786773114843865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412021662","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09845343,0.11624371,0.000026004742,0.7030313,0.00076474395,0.0011329217,0.000014224838,0.00008618967,0.0802475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018481,0.05793206,0.000087051245,0.037863236,0.00015545874,0.00005992697,0.000009340544,0.0000075537955,0.002037267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847114,0.00036166393,0.00021582723,0.0003180628,0.00032329946,0.0003099839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989418,0.0003013784,0.00009412375,0.00029684472,0.000045972272,0.00031988093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005707,0.00013601,0.00028173288,0.00003344214,0.0008819415,0.00019914578,0.00036780548,0.00004149262,0.00094037014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027358727,0.0000964895,0.00007218661,0.00044896125,0.00071118365,0.00023877798,0.0000587701,0.00013764332,0.00003051045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014335105,0.000020759977,0.00036108203,0.000120907,0.000024622197,0.000013156189,0.025977142,0.0000011028693,0.000010999945,0.5769127,0.0494031,0.34714007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035127585,0.000026392365,0.0013766165,0.0027361645,0.000040913234,6.7468204e-7,0.013914764,0.0000045427714,0.000019894293,0.00520877,0.9765037,0.0001324766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81707954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70708036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92710054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018158776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006581221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412073486","doi":"10.7202/1118442ar","title":"Revoir l’interprétation de la clause de dérogation à l’article 33 de la <i>Charte canadienne</i> suivant le recalibrage méthodologique de l’arrêt <i>Québec inc</i>","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.018881166952890282,"score_gpt":0.29543655110125244,"score_spread":0.27655538414836217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412073486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92252415,0.004461833,0.017215904,0.03616291,0.0004932202,0.00034598264,0.000085193016,0.00027736757,0.018433454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980777,0.003489076,0.0054096403,0.0015274341,0.000918275,0.0000793529,0.000017268345,0.00006661719,0.0077153225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384415,0.0034318932,0.0005106734,0.0005662264,0.0002043772,0.0014426797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549896,0.0032244131,0.00016183691,0.0003395451,0.000077767174,0.0006974974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791948,0.000251256,0.0003571869,0.00010729286,0.00049695314,0.0004798686,0.0005001937,0.0006069175,0.00021227112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019514798,0.00036525395,0.00023368649,0.00059579115,0.0007865141,0.0008324075,0.00009094773,0.00083229644,0.00015045264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002188824,0.00037156863,0.032896593,0.0020639861,0.00015209665,0.0030691565,0.111834675,0.002451716,0.05485259,0.7119786,0.03719609,0.04291401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070202595,0.00037779004,0.01399163,0.004012706,0.00063075655,0.002199676,0.010462243,0.038079213,0.018895179,0.3986054,0.5107209,0.0013224373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31372514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3074245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47352484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036864725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032975622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412073497","doi":"10.7202/1118439ar","title":"L’intérêt pour agir et le conflit des normes : analyse de l’article 85 du nouveau <i>Code de procédure civile</i> au regard de l’arrêt <i>Downtown Eastside</i>","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.02316147214268907,"score_gpt":0.28513917163083885,"score_spread":0.26197769948814975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412073497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8121301,0.010547458,0.003343851,0.100314155,0.00062308507,0.0005374447,0.00014933741,0.00042525958,0.07192932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705368,0.0041663684,0.00341233,0.0020853214,0.0020406577,0.00011660722,0.00001533157,0.000111735695,0.017514829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942677,0.0008113654,0.00078125496,0.0010186579,0.0005584445,0.0025625706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699074,0.00072584546,0.0002258179,0.0006283722,0.00027048812,0.0011587258],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037779585,0.0004833955,0.00071457546,0.0001534763,0.0009554393,0.0007973178,0.0009848792,0.00055459025,0.00071646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095603854,0.0006629638,0.000647776,0.0012695972,0.0014166131,0.0012604858,0.00022267392,0.0009546075,0.00064046704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031941722,0.0011740454,0.22647914,0.005153425,0.0006647593,0.004182704,0.10292234,0.003801509,0.02732717,0.52895236,0.064545855,0.034477293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019304784,0.00065087416,0.044801336,0.008857401,0.0027543176,0.004755386,0.030881993,0.035484556,0.023818735,0.25604007,0.5865112,0.0035136482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025083296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060360618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5219653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028886085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004540466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412261424","doi":"","title":"Commentary:Introduction of Fresh Evidence by the Prosecution During Cross-Examination in the Special Court for Sierra Leone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Special court; Law; Political science; History; Ethnology","score_opus":0.06874709827467554,"score_gpt":0.3451065918163597,"score_spread":0.2763594935416842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412261424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92601806,0.0009780277,0.00074839947,0.058671564,0.00009649205,0.0016524512,0.000090984264,0.000010780389,0.011733267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044977,0.00057439605,0.000050159328,0.000021435453,0.00018362346,5.901284e-7,0.000010951385,0.0000052977834,0.09465587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963661,0.0016353221,0.00018018174,0.00030521766,0.0011069857,0.0004062109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969833,0.0015945982,0.0002576117,0.0004373649,0.0006550352,0.000072121285],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067765564,0.000107092594,0.00022199345,0.000098677796,0.0024115609,0.000037768525,0.0016269826,0.00009536872,0.039105643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005071689,0.00007803281,0.00013428721,0.00063631695,0.0027050506,0.001038592,0.00033559627,0.00019905041,0.0008090279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013002375,0.000103564984,0.000057242076,0.000070295755,0.00003305817,0.0000062594067,0.020606661,0.000013649163,0.020091204,0.0009349425,0.95423216,0.0025507084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012052448,0.00036211696,0.0415648,0.0001884404,0.000069990594,0.0000024295732,0.068702765,0.000029070434,0.009302682,0.00005659573,0.87837046,0.00014539668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006808831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016220378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0829226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053606194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020084345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412274051","doi":"","title":"Constructing Remorse as a Legal Category: Plea Bargains at the ICTY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Plea; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1301054246176766,"score_gpt":0.3508797986428793,"score_spread":0.22077437402520272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412274051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42717862,0.0014607989,0.00013373228,0.008281024,0.000095395386,0.00062946434,0.00004062622,0.000036369165,0.562144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5640452,0.0001530612,0.00010598484,0.000031046075,0.000032918448,7.610494e-8,0.0000102087,0.000008556013,0.43561298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460715,0.0021135586,0.00018674466,0.00047464986,0.0018151052,0.0008027926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962869,0.0010744057,0.00027365005,0.000765243,0.0010633856,0.0005363935],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056227953,0.0001923801,0.00040223706,0.00013516661,0.0048565865,0.000078833225,0.002468334,0.0001763116,0.19571032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073858193,0.00018041571,0.00024197341,0.0010607848,0.0051448504,0.0008776885,0.0018612046,0.0005293781,0.0528401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092174945,0.0000561504,0.00003295767,0.000032310414,0.00009423608,0.00027043477,0.030943885,0.000029305555,0.000743668,0.0097938655,0.95522225,0.0018592142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062882656,0.00015279726,0.0004662286,0.000043642947,0.00007541068,0.000017653818,0.24484012,0.000050529332,0.0008452305,0.000056303186,0.7526633,0.00015996373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0738368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100578375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21389623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013010052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019049845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412620447","doi":"10.17118/11143/23019","title":"La circulation des modèles de règlement des différends entre le Québec et la France : l’exemple de la médiation familiale et de la conciliation par le juge","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de prévention et règlement des différends","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028076693752577125,"score_gpt":0.354768676853983,"score_spread":0.3266919831014059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412620447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8679514,0.0059927395,0.08984374,0.0044604805,0.0001988272,0.00046850042,0.000108008215,0.00017090044,0.03080538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98142904,0.0060286704,0.0039498652,0.0004909099,0.00013177896,0.00028221894,0.00017946091,0.00004438837,0.007463646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912995,0.005915186,0.00078359264,0.00063144293,0.00051435345,0.00085590844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687463,0.00189068,0.00045718675,0.00034470746,0.00018986975,0.00024289821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065373615,0.00041974292,0.00042712846,0.00020251112,0.0010109796,0.0005463434,0.00039236742,0.0004746119,0.00022562523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008348589,0.0005132082,0.000370859,0.00062141154,0.0011153108,0.0010245092,0.0001566472,0.00048409178,0.00000971318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010092212,0.0012933086,0.48562524,0.001568213,0.0002009001,0.000024795201,0.034263555,0.010450976,0.0074362047,0.3940398,0.0013737824,0.063622296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014030555,0.00012363715,0.7370004,0.0016990707,0.0003641686,0.000016655302,0.003295455,0.0079953,0.0016844983,0.044675503,0.20123886,0.0005033676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07502381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060330886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3493643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021391802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020943142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243843","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.157","title":"Une Proposition Plus Modeste: Soumissions Bilingues Au Minister de la Justice de Québec Dans the Cadre de Réformes Possible au Régime D’Action Collective","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07169375138471744,"score_gpt":0.3659684716094626,"score_spread":0.29427472022474516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18404396,0.10895909,0.0022979614,0.5750456,0.0043690098,0.0037338797,0.00039064797,0.00016604507,0.12099385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89905834,0.026909055,0.0002377386,0.007480794,0.00093171716,0.00050706574,0.000030110916,0.000047900303,0.06479727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962418,0.0018969415,0.0003528683,0.00034845097,0.00035452185,0.00080542784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807864,0.0005724672,0.00024566578,0.0002586257,0.00013383965,0.00071076275],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00198059,0.00022414596,0.00029735127,0.000098260556,0.005279994,0.00014338038,0.00034027715,0.00016224514,0.00074483955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056697003,0.0002067248,0.00020467737,0.0011099988,0.0006119402,0.00035834342,0.00003942401,0.0006466292,0.000042888332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030270166,0.00056243315,0.009210503,0.016676508,0.00047467282,0.00051917386,0.28248927,0.014831867,0.0028490457,0.06435362,0.44396675,0.16376346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013100178,0.000115116985,0.003671367,0.0016839701,0.0011556532,0.000434123,0.03751636,0.0024544322,0.00008847422,0.000787167,0.95164764,0.00031470484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9609831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98181176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7150144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036229853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043539107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243923","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.157","title":"A Wrench in the Social Justice Toolbox: Assessing the Constitutional Class Action as a Tool for Addressing Racial Discrimination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Racial profiling; Charter; Certification; Class action; Profiling (computer programming); Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Computer science; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.23614461289656694,"score_gpt":0.47982218160432744,"score_spread":0.2436775687077605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037742216,0.028702015,0.0058929813,0.77236813,0.0072422684,0.0043711774,0.00014669963,0.00011101187,0.1434235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98074317,0.004350608,0.000090457776,0.012412279,0.0014824541,0.00025425607,0.00007327979,0.000008663172,0.0005848118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787754,0.00072514353,0.00031789238,0.00026185362,0.00044243957,0.00037512762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986561,0.0006235646,0.00017285618,0.00014499712,0.00030043063,0.00010206619],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018979815,0.00012447883,0.00019727527,0.00006237107,0.0029561417,0.0005383662,0.00023272133,0.00011317281,0.00027776364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025135067,0.00009574582,0.0001445412,0.0005690386,0.00042669952,0.00075797,0.00001088816,0.00029582862,0.000026390537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001323601,0.000054915028,0.00013332744,0.0014940689,0.000025051862,0.00004054528,0.006262059,0.00002071289,0.00031451156,0.6949123,0.07676613,0.21996315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011317121,0.0000068511044,0.002279545,0.0009390218,0.0002516386,0.000027667656,0.012485135,0.00006578229,0.000013633891,0.0006220502,0.9830486,0.00014690227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015012053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4194929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009495992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036511524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244049","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.085","title":"<i>L’oratoire Saint-Joseph du Mont-Royal V JJ</i> and the Growing Complexity of Quebec’s Authorization Criteria","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Law; Supreme court; SAINT; Expansive; Authorization; Political science; Context (archaeology); Class action; Sociology; State (computer science); History; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10122455447083115,"score_gpt":0.33173791158624116,"score_spread":0.23051335711541002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020488411,0.040550355,0.00047625997,0.92384547,0.0007766556,0.0013638369,0.00004953401,0.00007440237,0.012375092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718472,0.013636689,0.000047747224,0.014003567,0.0002659077,0.000017104441,0.000009714575,0.000007742891,0.00016436992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988356,0.00039780448,0.00023993531,0.00016760649,0.0001778946,0.00018116328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992443,0.000089823414,0.00011831888,0.000100612444,0.00011115181,0.00033583408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006745895,0.000084984546,0.00024779027,0.000019888694,0.0005122414,0.00007530769,0.00015752208,0.000047384638,0.0003459863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006778927,0.00006931643,0.00007005728,0.00024654838,0.00049351767,0.00030938687,0.000017059345,0.0001076256,0.000015441517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025047328,0.000006917084,0.0005455498,0.0015860243,0.000022080905,0.0000082855995,0.0031314837,0.0000054030197,0.00012087162,0.8653384,0.07949737,0.049712576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010993588,0.000009037341,0.0009556895,0.0005046662,0.00006507014,0.0000012688223,0.00084445754,0.00027610591,0.000009421175,0.0002570765,0.99687743,0.00008984877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6724006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84072345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95135874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002136549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003809185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39397985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244056","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i1.005","title":"L’accès À la Justice Pour les Personnes Vulnérables par la Voie de L’action Collective en Droit Québécois","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Political science; Damages; Collateral; Settlement (finance); Compensation (psychology); Vulnerability (computing); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Geography; Computer security; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.11050649169997039,"score_gpt":0.3520173006824248,"score_spread":0.24151080898245442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05186021,0.07752136,0.0008549758,0.438601,0.0010725873,0.002000566,0.000120268654,0.00041669098,0.42755234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85061675,0.13340436,0.0002771733,0.00925208,0.0013078165,0.00010975609,0.000009947775,0.000035728608,0.004986396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817723,0.000746778,0.00019502296,0.00028269837,0.00022192151,0.0003763723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840564,0.0005989862,0.00011395705,0.0001094275,0.00013088883,0.0006411306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008045436,0.00014054739,0.0002571887,0.000063807856,0.0008642157,0.00012697015,0.00022505992,0.00014612508,0.00074253953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020328544,0.00015337783,0.00011642839,0.0004782144,0.00013909963,0.00031747934,0.000011279211,0.00028430315,0.00017379265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056220655,0.0000664303,0.003188917,0.0076143392,0.00015840973,0.00018215546,0.035313576,0.000065655586,0.00081460853,0.05892264,0.7064085,0.18720855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064645494,0.000019230785,0.0016707419,0.00066993124,0.0002708632,0.00001792638,0.01385348,0.0000536275,0.000029792007,0.00015683689,0.98301136,0.00018157517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57775867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9160232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79875654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012985937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032156303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81302875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244112","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.093","title":"The Unworkability of the Workable Methodology Standard","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Harm; Class (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Standard of review; Management science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Law; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Economics; Judicial review; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.24558615611904988,"score_gpt":0.4420005306699135,"score_spread":0.19641437455086364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070375046,0.2871067,0.00031520342,0.59338903,0.004156255,0.0010238643,0.000037074533,0.000032236407,0.10690213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.473331,0.49230582,0.00088874536,0.014373365,0.0004940093,0.000085660475,0.0000042440606,0.000020955176,0.018496208],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792266,0.0013350984,0.0001922941,0.00012719144,0.00019515488,0.00022761003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984942,0.00069716177,0.000091914386,0.0003396555,0.00022393923,0.00015312953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026577688,0.000049919523,0.00016667238,0.000008948913,0.00081137184,0.000033247787,0.00025128832,0.00004689742,0.0007152996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035595626,0.000031046406,0.00011611107,0.00047638064,0.00032636532,0.00006046845,0.00001994526,0.0001401924,0.000014671483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011050341,0.000010324814,0.004216813,0.0009064026,0.000037935333,0.000007295111,0.000775694,0.000009135577,0.00010054747,0.31062984,0.20004565,0.4832493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001335776,0.0000029059106,0.0011261549,0.0003920449,0.000033415738,0.0000020930622,0.00058755936,3.776045e-7,0.00007929801,0.0014022157,0.99632424,0.000036321293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09308507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9137595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8206745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036131733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002058575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91295415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413375438","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5393506","title":"Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Laws in Canada: Legal Framework, Challenges, and Future Directions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy laws of the United States; Computer security; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Privacy law; Law; Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03976092922511073,"score_gpt":0.32919435739142855,"score_spread":0.28943342816631784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413375438","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09154177,0.71293974,0.00013188433,0.17364934,0.0031654297,0.0005644019,0.00012399779,0.00005076231,0.017832687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41559476,0.5827995,0.00010621362,0.0000807124,0.0010233837,0.0000048764095,0.000007211482,0.000006611515,0.0003767269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699956,0.00032676922,0.00028727457,0.0005266311,0.0003958625,0.0014639129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989697,0.00020551268,0.00015817914,0.0004319513,0.000069752736,0.00016493564],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002555051,0.00020462685,0.00032832785,0.00010067631,0.00050527643,0.00016097674,0.00085409253,0.00029690415,0.000012871454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033855045,0.00020619895,0.000036661975,0.00012294222,0.00013007104,0.00031650264,0.0008329011,0.0057391776,4.1083356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025738995,0.000029936318,0.000983612,0.00006852859,0.00009088695,0.000022649829,0.0056932108,0.000001498849,1.4189655e-7,0.81572497,0.0005881889,0.17677067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011973315,0.000020750831,0.0036022987,0.00029179303,0.000075328106,0.000067848545,0.02828239,0.000018803168,1.275842e-7,0.33816633,0.6291064,0.00024822642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9402151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99937713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62851816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032036568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031853337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413396821","doi":"10.1007/s12286-025-00649-8","title":"The rule of law under permanent pressure and the compensatory role of external accountability: A comparative study of independent police complaints bodies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Accountability; Rule of law; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0310984087084388,"score_gpt":0.36781338807091907,"score_spread":0.3367149793624803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413396821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408691,0.005597951,0.000009949983,0.0010637895,0.00017301613,0.00095241884,0.00004501097,0.000023975463,0.05126479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926466,0.00009112572,0.000021024909,0.00013385274,0.000065018925,0.00002909477,0.000001380884,0.000009741916,0.0003841197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660134,0.0010066018,0.0007353195,0.00033240402,0.0008784064,0.00044590884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658674,0.0018125571,0.00042334216,0.0005675794,0.000500512,0.00010927832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015938801,0.0002420812,0.0007061854,0.00008124585,0.0008379756,0.00006778895,0.0007220314,0.0001110989,0.00002890644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084340034,0.00016101694,0.00014576258,0.00016530057,0.0031306373,0.00018601622,0.00039047332,0.00032138024,0.0000029015803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005373558,0.00043124997,0.005885493,0.000099392164,0.00026290372,6.305989e-7,0.12748273,0.000083739695,0.0012461245,0.86386704,0.000053898817,0.000049461803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040923664,0.0003844752,0.15915135,0.0004492593,0.0009082876,0.000008904279,0.7767803,0.00026731638,0.009928351,0.018266892,0.029332954,0.00042955356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1381162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041848306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8456001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019406427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022204098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413469227","doi":"10.29173/mlj1394","title":"Getting Rid of the Riot Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Repeal; Charter; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Criminal code; Law and economics; Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02681296220836043,"score_gpt":0.3197490507229217,"score_spread":0.29293608851456127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413469227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6565097,0.00035905774,0.00006787445,0.014938752,0.0017081285,0.0000915818,9.851863e-7,0.000016325539,0.32630762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998577,0.00004148278,0.000091418675,0.0005295292,0.00038424053,6.3728316e-7,3.8234894e-8,0.0000025142529,0.00037313587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990967,0.00016282142,0.00018082409,0.0000662562,0.00030247337,0.00019093516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950147,0.00013182695,0.00011349527,0.00010854261,0.00009965948,0.000045026823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008821494,0.000049979164,0.00008819153,0.000021719654,0.0014605656,0.00012038815,0.00043963184,0.00003841968,0.00009150766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022575445,0.000034174987,0.00010241178,0.00015722922,0.00025814795,0.00014733407,0.00006694687,0.0002325007,0.000009649346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034768615,0.00007355079,0.033168893,0.00004553137,0.000055210767,0.00002141694,0.004542443,0.00003293749,0.0016819412,0.86375386,0.014761651,0.0818278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025771008,0.000032525226,0.04007041,0.00047222598,0.00008994747,0.000028780489,0.049031552,0.00001583693,0.0029521156,0.04668222,0.86020976,0.00015692631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02532972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20846944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008218315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001303167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413614359","doi":"10.64628/aam.dy6x5dgj9","title":"How police are recovering the victims of the Toronto serial killer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.035969271133543194,"score_gpt":0.3099297992675217,"score_spread":0.2739605281339785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413614359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5186166,0.000077016935,0.000046731544,0.03555087,0.002955239,0.00022404421,0.000002586029,0.000041308373,0.44248557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802929,0.000029086845,0.000047693742,0.00037882102,0.0010775055,0.0000024484784,4.860679e-8,0.0000029159653,0.01816859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994211,0.00007389563,0.00006141635,0.000081661296,0.00021393012,0.0001479907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999574,0.00007522984,0.000055065946,0.00018463506,0.00008131006,0.000029760815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028153497,0.000042683274,0.000057191788,0.0000025211934,0.00047819808,0.00007718438,0.00035458786,0.000035119927,0.0007063627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001104297,0.00002097477,0.000043017826,0.00006601429,0.00029689743,0.0002435287,0.00007340133,0.000031773405,0.000014646844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022826825,0.000111429465,0.015648076,0.000052701056,0.00008710149,8.099198e-7,0.39312002,0.000008420089,0.008438118,0.29780304,0.25907603,0.025425958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058407008,0.0000331706,0.009900865,0.000026352913,0.000012457844,5.375138e-7,0.06979586,0.0000074966733,0.0014958438,0.00040016288,0.9181937,0.00007512481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16915569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56954783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005472179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045368954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83637697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413634966","doi":"10.64628/aam.5nfqpp9mf","title":"10 privacy violations in the federal government’s proposed changes to the Canada Elections Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Internet privacy; Public administration; Privacy policy; Law; Political science; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.036798148470274065,"score_gpt":0.3165036552643556,"score_spread":0.2797055067940815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413634966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06833724,0.00011741132,0.00007636993,0.73021936,0.0003802471,0.00059088995,0.0000095206005,0.00005130507,0.20021766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96349484,0.000013621056,0.000020984597,0.0016813214,0.00020727541,0.000034272645,6.515761e-7,0.0000027692822,0.034544274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991383,0.00009383512,0.00006181838,0.000107261665,0.00041908803,0.00017967267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996059,0.0002306716,0.000008109532,0.00010281448,0.000016263039,0.000036248177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039133918,0.000045098168,0.00003605978,0.000009870629,0.0007302159,0.00026577173,0.0002556336,0.00001638025,0.00091265177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016873368,0.000023622079,0.000017109798,0.00036329063,0.000029672658,0.000088602676,0.000025630172,0.00008934902,0.000060630642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014985499,0.00003955496,0.0013006016,0.000013658364,0.000016415857,0.000014123716,0.038299896,0.00003274764,0.0001608986,0.13110718,0.8096036,0.019396376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011015041,0.000020937752,0.004913594,0.000012300158,0.00000506059,8.338067e-7,0.006729673,0.00007204476,0.00003284673,0.00019377693,0.98796403,0.000043885237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.858083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99876577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003204419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052034087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413639863","doi":"10.64628/aam.hj4kdrnst","title":"Calls to designate the Bishnoi gang a terrorist group shine a spotlight on Canada’s security laws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Criminology; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.032133175016556936,"score_gpt":0.32944572575898434,"score_spread":0.2973125507424274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413639863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057254348,0.0004452755,0.00060815294,0.3490085,0.0041703815,0.002491298,0.00026686958,0.00029145487,0.5854637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616013,0.00008070297,0.00018164092,0.008554184,0.00046465977,0.00009528884,0.00001127982,0.00001154174,0.028999409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727505,0.00034694496,0.00031988908,0.0006249299,0.0008864286,0.00054674747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984082,0.00046481358,0.00010426199,0.000613189,0.000132068,0.0002774909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013319448,0.00029054875,0.0003489381,0.00006986795,0.0007902292,0.0002834035,0.0013541675,0.00023008739,0.00044823255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004231709,0.00020256809,0.00013596247,0.00027445637,0.00015133529,0.000062858315,0.00063213665,0.0006693426,0.000043390603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014595735,0.00013636211,0.00045099223,0.00023988287,0.00009099327,0.00017065676,0.027817164,0.00021288804,0.000031789397,0.26123193,0.7058091,0.0036622705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007851476,0.00004283564,0.0010729664,0.00046355498,0.0000737406,7.267147e-7,0.0039097317,0.000058154354,0.00014633077,0.008299694,0.9853944,0.00045934526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98879504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99875677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90434694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081445026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026457945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8260487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413733822","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v19i1.159","title":"To Certify or not to Certify: Third Parties, Necessary Parties, and the Certification of Class Actions in Common Law Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Law; Class (philosophy); Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2073191494114714,"score_gpt":0.393964020773789,"score_spread":0.1866448713623176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413733822","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18426718,0.0043947673,0.000003925974,0.7940423,0.00092196977,0.0023903043,0.00013409906,0.00008085799,0.013764619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97343564,0.011423161,0.000007782604,0.013189925,0.000063479965,0.00022113345,0.000014624244,0.000012230937,0.0016320408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980182,0.00039876284,0.0004925407,0.00027572399,0.00037098135,0.00044380952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851763,0.0004248356,0.00012314452,0.00034802337,0.00010525001,0.00048111382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011712117,0.00013395745,0.00036902423,0.000111582696,0.00060340104,0.00007496777,0.00028367058,0.00007308398,0.00016134189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046092732,0.00010556766,0.000051196203,0.0013141556,0.00020400652,0.0002084983,0.000034623692,0.0001890003,0.00005340282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003674288,0.00003494682,0.002981354,0.0021421239,0.000058721394,0.000037154612,0.006191372,0.0002649058,0.00037613075,0.23646162,0.6808625,0.07022178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008434595,0.000014670793,0.008600678,0.0007142613,0.000041261275,0.0000017876908,0.0021755183,0.000030542295,0.000066807006,0.000107963715,0.9880207,0.00014142881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99986774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7891684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089543086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017797054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46409342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803083","doi":"10.29173/mlj1469","title":"Zora , the Charter , and the Youth Criminal Justice Act : Defending the Rights of Youths is the Responsibility of all Court Participants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Criminal justice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.09147198667652984,"score_gpt":0.3585794246392055,"score_spread":0.26710743796267566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589823,0.0007582484,0.000052717045,0.029605523,0.000604139,0.00034215258,0.000016837892,0.0000075776557,0.009630515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808645,0.00016215566,0.000015306685,0.0013475175,0.00028308932,0.0000052607766,2.0212157e-7,0.0000045222514,0.00009548198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684155,0.0014896101,0.0004818312,0.00016311063,0.00063098536,0.00039289155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966797,0.0022711123,0.00032829077,0.0004089577,0.00023942484,0.00007250264],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007894287,0.0001318766,0.0002400218,0.000027199818,0.0031237262,0.00025874606,0.0008988948,0.000059547463,0.0000628061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064556726,0.000049679405,0.00016947366,0.0001882651,0.0025724112,0.00018802239,0.00014726755,0.00047305124,0.0000040475225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018719952,0.0001240967,0.0033287338,0.00010711248,0.0003054652,0.0000130921635,0.47419104,0.000015119894,0.00010391544,0.5122481,0.0029676417,0.0047236746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007912806,0.00009254319,0.01701167,0.00027449013,0.0032354754,0.0000310876,0.90944487,0.00014532925,0.00055848755,0.038612224,0.029643955,0.00015860885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02737149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09081347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47363588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052093816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013756592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803092","doi":"10.29173/mlj1436","title":"The Dangers of Police “Operational” Independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Independence (probability theory); Law; Legislature; Statute; Law enforcement; Political science; Legislation; Enforcement; Statutory law; Judicial discretion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.026235348595649827,"score_gpt":0.32984606926507104,"score_spread":0.3036107206694212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26598683,0.0016287382,0.0005927111,0.037060123,0.0024025147,0.00023175609,0.0000037632876,0.000033558536,0.69206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980672,0.00029569463,0.00009957701,0.0005569736,0.00031609563,0.0000021681299,1.4896004e-7,0.0000023094235,0.00065984466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894124,0.00015301234,0.00019494806,0.00007050706,0.0004486829,0.00019160338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992245,0.0002842513,0.00008240586,0.00010021808,0.00024943324,0.000059209975],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001178525,0.00005053184,0.00007250832,0.000027379687,0.0022893068,0.00023056635,0.0004313368,0.000046400317,0.00006775662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014811277,0.000035765897,0.00005617042,0.00016118826,0.00040781705,0.00023259371,0.000040214352,0.00021275005,0.000015575644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020833735,0.000018469058,0.0021248613,0.0000055386195,0.000019532346,0.000003612133,0.0021510276,0.000016029553,0.00015276263,0.97331464,0.008434717,0.013737948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013448205,0.000028538809,0.004195294,0.000087881686,0.000025005127,0.000015738671,0.07873446,0.000011558473,0.0005441131,0.021557616,0.8945784,0.000086893626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115152724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53783953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008697013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022155944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803093","doi":"10.29173/mlj1467","title":"A Rush to Justice: The Institution of Presumptive Ceilings in R v Jordan and Their Potential Implications for Wrongful Convictions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Economic Justice; Law; Criminal justice; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03519614542772662,"score_gpt":0.34546262910588454,"score_spread":0.3102664836781579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92498916,0.00034028458,0.019730415,0.041632757,0.00084093644,0.0008056558,0.00003682525,0.000015931926,0.0116080465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990205,0.00010541086,0.0002997927,0.0003015457,0.00019976875,0.000030084244,6.4379003e-7,0.0000023020666,0.000039944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993975,0.00007436078,0.0001970531,0.0000972133,0.0000767246,0.00015715968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994371,0.00018622,0.000070127106,0.00008015325,0.0001704133,0.000055972087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005792151,0.00005608301,0.000090368696,0.000060240327,0.0014744457,0.000108698296,0.00018456945,0.000039288625,0.000005801392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001624044,0.000041054354,0.00004673599,0.00017204879,0.00027421938,0.00018019992,0.00003789016,0.00012890912,0.0000010563773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007698643,0.00005617074,0.00092955626,0.00002796645,0.000021792528,6.2802854e-7,0.0083210645,0.00023724517,0.00082765066,0.977529,0.0007577633,0.011214184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093282,0.00022005742,0.113244206,0.00043253376,0.00037299228,0.00004640437,0.36787596,0.00023532791,0.00091001595,0.21316801,0.30211455,0.0002866637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011113613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24533775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76436096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008450811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012183981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803095","doi":"10.29173/mlj1446","title":"The Problem of Threshold in the Emergencies Act – A Triple Incapacity Model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Ambiguity; Political science; Declaration; Law and economics; Law; Computer security; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.053497907233864356,"score_gpt":0.32845232724072465,"score_spread":0.2749544200068603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7414209,0.0008321603,0.00025349323,0.02271316,0.00039994635,0.00035157974,0.0000026532928,0.000014756764,0.23401135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998747,0.00044295526,0.00014025808,0.00030096585,0.00011387884,0.000009012998,1.0868574e-7,0.000002604892,0.00024321397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867284,0.00022844426,0.00029621023,0.000084084895,0.00044691077,0.00027150605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994015,0.00019850097,0.000112160815,0.00014045196,0.00011210935,0.000035241435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029935834,0.00007204021,0.00011200629,0.000034032182,0.0018202352,0.00019080058,0.0007489353,0.00004760417,0.00001735913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008929507,0.0000393827,0.000093064526,0.00028924368,0.00040602783,0.00023100915,0.00005225496,0.00034438452,0.000003015825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006409756,0.00008852378,0.0040122587,0.00001993572,0.000020438687,0.0000065670583,0.013099148,0.0003902056,0.00016319376,0.9621154,0.010442495,0.009577738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003939762,0.00008265617,0.0035521896,0.00020631496,0.00006543372,0.000013369785,0.23654684,0.0022595676,0.00029325424,0.5931993,0.1631896,0.00019748112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024104267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58255905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55845475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075883036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017687221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803105","doi":"10.29173/mlj1466","title":"“Interrogators often use honey, not vinegar, in pursuit of the truth”: Resistance, the Constitutional Right to Silence and Judicial Responses to Cell-Plant Operations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Silence; Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.028899689069268993,"score_gpt":0.2978155939401019,"score_spread":0.2689159048708329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518471,0.00013034475,0.00021349241,0.038373277,0.0011503935,0.0003117599,0.00006678767,0.000008779266,0.007898089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967551,0.000045000914,0.00024475742,0.0022358058,0.00016442286,0.000008405906,3.6767463e-7,0.000002785033,0.00054334116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842876,0.0003556605,0.00032477186,0.0001622901,0.00048974465,0.00023876799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987586,0.0007512869,0.00006273776,0.00015931056,0.00015598864,0.000112070644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011035859,0.00009641491,0.00014610431,0.00009513738,0.0016236126,0.0003597172,0.0005938372,0.00004815127,0.000046422294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010888702,0.000060989016,0.000057306504,0.00037686215,0.0009128969,0.00025071946,0.00014488827,0.00024322022,0.00000680127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058366737,0.00007549584,0.0052800323,0.000013010579,0.000017289247,0.00004136969,0.004839807,0.00020085988,0.002233308,0.97063345,0.015756585,0.00032512037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009183386,0.00015968452,0.09409417,0.0015985214,0.00014533353,0.00007228939,0.058250975,0.000036414272,0.008167369,0.008235056,0.82785493,0.0004668932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013110769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5185785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013666421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003842981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803113","doi":"10.29173/mlj1437","title":"Public Order Policing: a Proposal for a Charter-compliant Legislative Response","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Legislature; Public administration; CLARITY; Government (linguistics); Commission; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09954293055492032,"score_gpt":0.3641933856721289,"score_spread":0.2646504551172086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2588687,0.0003533623,0.016549965,0.4759407,0.0034875344,0.0017651932,0.000028248118,0.00022044398,0.24278587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391097,0.000017666664,0.0020277004,0.0014114757,0.00079302513,0.000031168853,9.155138e-7,0.0000111732115,0.0017959243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982118,0.00041207124,0.0002832443,0.00019212873,0.00034701935,0.0005537395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861634,0.00039453435,0.00012632499,0.00013999392,0.00053534686,0.00018744876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021583107,0.00012797136,0.0001899989,0.00013408906,0.0025633404,0.00065839954,0.00040809234,0.0000810096,0.00008997103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078830944,0.00011024672,0.000120740246,0.00034695945,0.00034980566,0.0005203476,0.000052711574,0.0002654702,0.000032675172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006957171,0.000099213765,0.0006533002,0.000020529873,0.000053045795,0.000031079635,0.007219579,0.0000017062755,0.00042890973,0.96477234,0.013304819,0.012719761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006473262,0.00022378167,0.0020343289,0.00016094686,0.000047839585,0.000048563867,0.031592887,0.000053131178,0.00012736335,0.0724788,0.8923775,0.0002075605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020865863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33344245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8922935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027706337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010099483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803134","doi":"10.29173/mlj1440","title":"Interjurisdictional Accountability for Interjurisdictional Problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Mandate; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Commission; Political science; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Order (exchange); Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.040417446634113695,"score_gpt":0.3566701150574818,"score_spread":0.31625266842336813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35876876,0.0014132102,0.08198988,0.06393505,0.021526564,0.0022798276,0.00012029444,0.00047409374,0.46949235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964595,0.000054644348,0.00069456245,0.000819975,0.0014224347,0.000048328668,0.0000045019815,0.000008122077,0.00048793486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847025,0.00012639625,0.0003918004,0.00022503154,0.00041262893,0.00037388143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988762,0.0003059587,0.000116649964,0.00012262423,0.0004462896,0.00013225492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015690498,0.00012386689,0.00016412712,0.00009279139,0.0022902286,0.00043841836,0.00040832642,0.00010432572,0.0003549347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017212554,0.000116283605,0.00020589987,0.00016502092,0.0004163754,0.00059485866,0.000064629756,0.00033855267,0.000030720097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002814115,0.00028529638,0.011187841,0.000086150525,0.00012990508,0.0000052895725,0.003110545,0.000060074544,0.00009904289,0.8974469,0.050961103,0.036346458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034578756,0.000071054295,0.0032429458,0.00014261679,0.000045512916,0.000023776289,0.011971824,0.000036220878,0.000053893214,0.14591506,0.8380208,0.00013047703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011119331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20862347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050184847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027642364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803135","doi":"10.29173/mlj1480","title":"Racializing Terror: Reassessing the Motive of the Motive Clause","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Terrorism; Legislation; Racism; Criminology; Criminal justice; Law; Legislative history; Political science; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.03388675302078331,"score_gpt":0.34456557747940575,"score_spread":0.31067882445862244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.715328,0.0007915889,0.00058512075,0.030385239,0.0028742182,0.00034569632,0.00000469203,0.000034279114,0.24965118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985022,0.00005917917,0.00007992141,0.0006892815,0.00043703514,0.000002333137,1.0456018e-7,0.000005432267,0.00022453694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829775,0.00057671714,0.00027071615,0.000118254284,0.000462311,0.000274231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902964,0.00029038597,0.00023678967,0.00018891346,0.00019938179,0.00005490224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013843084,0.000095163865,0.00014456434,0.000033322758,0.0032238674,0.00029978712,0.0006832109,0.00006305871,0.00004364654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004339023,0.000054206816,0.00015477999,0.00029636305,0.00075209845,0.00029567676,0.00012937574,0.00043060878,0.000006182274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079896614,0.00011786282,0.024269687,0.000036628553,0.00014056679,0.000032179152,0.036956012,0.000068468704,0.0008154542,0.8748083,0.0055407705,0.057134155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047804968,0.000061298095,0.08105254,0.0014857876,0.00034526148,0.00005364869,0.60936755,0.00005005874,0.0023559392,0.08961428,0.21484157,0.00029399793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023068238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20232527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78519404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001847679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002136116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803180","doi":"10.29173/mlj1482","title":"Establishing Police Accountability: How Do We Stop Charter Violations from Happening","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Accountability; Misconduct; Political science; Law; Wonder; Pledge; Psychology","score_opus":0.04308281489198616,"score_gpt":0.328212989770504,"score_spread":0.28513017487851783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82654977,0.0015416073,0.003916344,0.07403035,0.003476476,0.00030431492,0.000028690618,0.00015221881,0.09000021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967034,0.00022677096,0.000511004,0.00067686784,0.0015711915,0.000003976813,0.0000019200165,0.000008890837,0.00029597495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984036,0.00023512854,0.00024595697,0.0002280591,0.00047568875,0.00041156312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882865,0.00047025454,0.00013098009,0.00020409632,0.00020485502,0.00016115468],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010131348,0.00012858791,0.00018646523,0.00008818201,0.0027839546,0.002488232,0.0005207033,0.00010704707,0.0004147647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001761651,0.00012326697,0.0001109043,0.00028332855,0.00020852024,0.0017366684,0.000096544674,0.00048966106,0.00004434151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017893249,0.00023873625,0.06746394,0.0000673993,0.00022628864,0.00005829815,0.1318121,0.00006238644,0.0016179334,0.45619673,0.041756157,0.3003211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020442663,0.000015170552,0.004626116,0.00031442515,0.000071631745,0.00000749068,0.23057951,0.000046500856,0.00006009673,0.020658279,0.7432303,0.00018608829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3031899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60363597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70147413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000285899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015362505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413949777","doi":"10.63478/5zj20aul","title":"Proud Boys face Canada’s Anti-Terror Law: But Who’s Next?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.11650255617685304,"score_gpt":0.3642092182995316,"score_spread":0.24770666212267858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413949777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027606648,0.0030077796,0.00002148553,0.016190566,0.0033678298,0.0004477623,0.000055171622,0.00010509703,0.97404367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37191087,0.0029103688,0.00010395197,0.0009827919,0.0016172762,0.00002728845,0.00006403176,0.000038163784,0.62234527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563634,0.00016783465,0.00045436455,0.0006528819,0.0023644057,0.0007241603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981565,0.0001113446,0.0002322083,0.000466761,0.0006851222,0.0003480934],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096903695,0.00031467847,0.00063674833,0.000035994683,0.0007574197,0.000470965,0.0006232916,0.00040268194,0.002164821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005802391,0.0002892486,0.00018746837,0.00018239606,0.00026006278,0.00034597315,0.00017366691,0.00044996987,0.00004846976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034941902,0.000037475813,0.00037566212,0.00034248273,0.0000664919,0.0007319779,0.0020119427,0.0000023356163,0.00002591421,0.017456995,0.9755247,0.00342048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000335265,0.00001297059,0.00031203928,0.00027662845,0.00007099398,0.000022550563,0.01296651,0.0000016292153,0.00006824391,0.000055084667,0.9857728,0.00040704597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99931055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3691502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012295881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034049746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414204183","doi":"10.61205/s199132220031084-8","title":"Criminal Liability for Fraud in Anglo-Saxon States (Using the Examples of UK, USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Criminal liability; Criminal law; Proportionality (law); Criminal procedure; State (computer science); Liability","score_opus":0.17736655301466211,"score_gpt":0.38988399475969393,"score_spread":0.21251744174503182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414204183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935774,0.00029351652,0.0013796528,0.0012326472,0.000072906376,0.00017565035,0.000007262561,8.387478e-7,0.0032601191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984385,0.000030718787,0.0007755888,0.00010295981,0.000060994666,0.0000011556971,7.457856e-7,9.818656e-7,0.0005883825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991659,0.00012050638,0.00032215778,0.00008196164,0.00018504391,0.00012445262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989521,0.0005221424,0.00022581521,0.00004837549,0.00019239649,0.000059207225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650972,0.00006808081,0.00021621714,0.00004015651,0.00020045979,0.000053421703,0.000088939625,0.000032050313,0.000032294476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005529293,0.0000484461,0.000033805733,0.00011581011,0.00027469493,0.00021934547,0.000012580612,0.0000950256,4.7049685e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032772354,0.000032679553,0.13927871,0.00004282437,0.0000334474,0.0000018836105,0.014545551,0.0006841191,0.00019409631,0.8377426,0.006381212,0.00073512766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001963542,0.0005273535,0.52658814,0.000581843,0.00025492167,0.000012856262,0.053216115,0.0020308122,0.0016496277,0.24713364,0.16572402,0.00031714293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5196766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8315056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59060895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069394635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035454024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4835219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415280268","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102533","title":"Corrigendum to “Is the Static-99R valid for all men with ‘identifiable’ victims? Examining cases of online sexual solicitation of children” [Journal of Criminal Justice 97 (2025) 102358]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre; Université de Montréal; Université Laval; University of Ottawa; Government of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sexual violence; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.1211340924608414,"score_gpt":0.4026846393693931,"score_spread":0.2815505469085517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415280268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97485584,0.00068865233,0.018939983,0.0025179924,0.0015759937,0.0004916182,0.00009714848,0.000008103045,0.000824647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98410136,0.00030357152,0.012223241,0.00087902445,0.0009061333,0.0000052645037,0.000005644995,0.000025643689,0.0015500945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956744,0.00040630257,0.0016894415,0.00024441295,0.0014770945,0.00050836854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057174,0.0029135782,0.0023071554,0.00026213226,0.0036803114,0.00026506776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033103183,0.00027940967,0.000771592,0.00046241234,0.00045829982,0.00013276856,0.00094426086,0.00011943893,0.00008118362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048989365,0.00020375682,0.00020491464,0.0005929694,0.0004224209,0.00070829404,0.00008694049,0.00043707987,0.0000021982553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027774861,0.0041950797,0.0038742805,0.019008577,0.0037620293,0.0007009208,0.6716507,0.012830344,0.032940242,0.02509523,0.13861707,0.05955067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002381885,0.007660359,0.010211463,0.002991621,0.04808468,0.00063080445,0.91236836,0.0005363026,0.008460908,0.00041431683,0.005744885,0.0005144202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018560815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007759914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24071765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018972936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014868536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8308962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415583124","doi":"10.61345/1339-7915.2025.1.11","title":"The principle of the free evaluation of evidence","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Visegrad Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conviction; Element (criminal law); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Enforcement","score_opus":0.2619277938794468,"score_gpt":0.47478912046713007,"score_spread":0.21286132658768325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415583124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635124,0.005930525,0.00001976741,0.010666381,0.002959193,0.0007868114,0.0000056012314,0.0000073986316,0.016111882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390984,0.0006850806,0.000016318843,0.000060613722,0.0003388895,0.00000778357,1.0794114e-7,0.000006771427,0.004974595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226695,0.002511768,0.001200321,0.0002847272,0.0033112403,0.00042500277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429345,0.0015457436,0.001393644,0.0010059263,0.0016369474,0.0001242685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010788083,0.0002316889,0.00037613715,0.00014636244,0.006112104,0.00024578927,0.0027331002,0.00014257936,0.00036305646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018306914,0.00010170349,0.0005096004,0.0008084808,0.0016043853,0.00040607,0.00023442808,0.0006788259,0.00001099062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017262211,0.00025782338,0.0009194635,0.00008104747,0.00015459747,0.0000026125124,0.0037108276,0.00017530913,0.00076324586,0.98168737,0.0050657685,0.0070093214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009680331,0.0005646019,0.05120211,0.007504936,0.0011444563,0.0000070087804,0.0007008636,0.0004254469,0.008644638,0.73644793,0.1921334,0.00025659215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053996063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004297421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24523945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004091916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010744333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290318","doi":"10.29173/alr2826","title":"Licencing State Misconduct: Revisiting Nasogaluak and Ward","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Misconduct; Charter; Compensation (psychology); State (computer science); Section (typography)","score_opus":0.033512376375265975,"score_gpt":0.3523474182841691,"score_spread":0.3188350419089031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075441105,0.65456533,0.000009116462,0.0614656,0.0006546134,0.0010671908,0.000004475177,0.000028070186,0.27466148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28667042,0.6789903,0.00013847128,0.015739525,0.00026502207,0.00003665476,0.0000038380645,0.000023002136,0.018132757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592924,0.0007698393,0.0010798533,0.00089559885,0.00048035066,0.0008450933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668115,0.0017813663,0.00038640932,0.0005976386,0.00023212767,0.00032129127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027493297,0.0004324532,0.0010868424,0.000044221535,0.0014343924,0.00037318736,0.00058627967,0.00013669206,0.0010874505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017735208,0.00040567768,0.00028106073,0.00089257874,0.0007312964,0.00077594584,0.00035467529,0.00043159924,0.00033243667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017140694,0.000045712557,0.00045938243,0.034777503,0.00016826407,0.000027450824,0.005324739,7.4877926e-7,0.00008780429,0.68734,0.013847927,0.2579033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334384,0.000033514025,0.00006664301,0.07127512,0.0006825833,0.000009089241,0.00044272424,0.000014082642,0.000046801095,0.0013626593,0.9255274,0.00040597367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06895024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023164937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91167945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013836609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037520783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416416295","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5647750","title":"The Consent Integrity Clause (2025)&amp;nbsp;&lt;div&gt; The First Forensic Doctrine of Autonomy&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt; An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Consent Integrity Audit and Evidentiary Framework)&lt;/div&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Audit; Agency (philosophy); Criminal procedure; Criminal code; Data integrity","score_opus":0.07907630550485088,"score_gpt":0.3668040353423497,"score_spread":0.2877277298374988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416416295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.729018,0.07566396,0.01732387,0.1514585,0.012024209,0.008721458,0.0007369849,0.0004376023,0.0046154438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8278654,0.15496327,0.0012609875,0.0025243994,0.0038202074,0.00042795116,0.00007994772,0.0002087628,0.008849061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96535736,0.0072280765,0.006265544,0.0044020005,0.0056256596,0.01112136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968774,0.01464044,0.005350476,0.0055079195,0.0035987396,0.0021283892],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035320684,0.003738837,0.0041539473,0.0010441256,0.01324929,0.0044122306,0.011344618,0.0025730152,0.0014756998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011182789,0.0025421218,0.0030391328,0.0029616735,0.010080341,0.0016986077,0.0061298334,0.030611347,0.00030060278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009614377,0.0037397782,0.009417069,0.002502875,0.010128276,0.0002433005,0.070327066,0.0011447162,0.0013842916,0.707864,0.06523327,0.11840101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002487209,0.002626172,0.009493878,0.008336325,0.0068042884,0.0016586685,0.031851918,0.00060340064,0.00035920826,0.30104086,0.630579,0.0041590654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148498975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5066309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56534576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011036254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049305294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416878322","doi":"10.4000/1597s","title":"Lanceur d’alerte ou informateur de police : quand le statut du dénonciateur influence le régime de protections","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)","funders":"","keywords":"Workaround; Legislation; Poison control; Criminal liability","score_opus":0.01559623106755947,"score_gpt":0.29264118055015154,"score_spread":0.27704494948259206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416878322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62299955,0.0008497482,0.009253226,0.17754592,0.0007821342,0.00201608,0.0000801364,0.0005870792,0.18588614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97164184,0.0018516289,0.00048755304,0.018396849,0.00037445474,0.00045761673,0.0000072103207,0.000036264475,0.0067466004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489903,0.0011824329,0.000948992,0.0006801074,0.0005463788,0.0017430487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967656,0.0005836294,0.00043790092,0.0006374758,0.00092148787,0.00065390504],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004075918,0.00049912796,0.00055731146,0.00041103023,0.0023118192,0.0012384908,0.0013594733,0.00082002685,0.00006236197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027142775,0.0005648632,0.00026348812,0.0018876124,0.00078310183,0.003631213,0.0004035515,0.0015358033,0.000109308676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019031529,0.00033843264,0.016456656,0.00054757966,0.00009237738,0.000023100252,0.02584944,0.00086890353,0.0012396639,0.940924,0.012072507,0.0013970396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009842993,0.00021709777,0.046372943,0.00085253414,0.00010201867,0.000060257757,0.014282236,0.0011356117,0.0032428305,0.030009087,0.90170395,0.0010371299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3169211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07978507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008795774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023241777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417042885","doi":"10.3138/chr.106.4.br16","title":"<i>Canadian Criminal Law in Ten Cases.</i> Martin L. Friedland","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.04193980006277599,"score_gpt":0.3185597430915202,"score_spread":0.2766199430287442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417042885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044908465,0.19680868,0.000003903139,0.17017452,0.00095122773,0.0005624286,0.000016393107,0.000028872497,0.63100487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.797775,0.045603,0.00014018113,0.085885525,0.0004035671,0.0001527853,0.000018340785,0.000028415374,0.06999324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982584,0.0001885889,0.00033516018,0.0002970677,0.00020414774,0.0007166439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981777,0.00014535156,0.000038915394,0.00025152112,0.00008513801,0.0013013552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008308047,0.00013198351,0.00033688336,0.00020426794,0.0005070068,0.00004875533,0.00038593705,0.00010183414,0.000673405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012070833,0.00013840008,0.00009746819,0.0007895835,0.00007835478,0.0001281087,0.000014326125,0.00023665807,0.00021458878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036122653,0.000012591738,0.0025604332,0.00063590676,0.0000046074765,0.00073194614,0.00041664977,2.2650293e-7,5.018839e-7,0.16699094,0.7812408,0.04740177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044569868,0.000011744155,0.00031461817,0.0012059233,0.000048937392,0.0000047296544,0.00004732773,6.9522343e-7,2.3707662e-7,0.0006603756,0.9975109,0.00014996024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99794734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99984825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79732585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018506741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041096965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.985261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W49823495","doi":"10.71781/23468","title":"Les négociations des plaidoyers de culpabilité : la pratique des avocats de la défense","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06708335478473432,"score_gpt":0.4179866696126532,"score_spread":0.35090331482791887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W49823495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7622343,0.00041402958,0.000353112,0.00066209404,0.0001378513,0.00041534772,0.000023880008,0.000005010773,0.23575439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94610417,0.00054059096,0.018502869,0.000053246014,0.0002015292,0.00010628653,0.00008659569,0.000032923257,0.034371812],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585515,0.0023358571,0.00040509697,0.0004934803,0.0003206592,0.00058973685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960292,0.002887432,0.00029817075,0.0002438033,0.00024370532,0.00029769106],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003961746,0.0003088695,0.00036928788,0.00006707953,0.0018745088,0.00090502464,0.00089429517,0.00071117905,0.0018673902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002818677,0.00032810416,0.0001626074,0.00032485754,0.001578249,0.0006287214,0.00008161779,0.0004707665,0.00033856733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013900464,0.00037324868,0.038056146,0.00033610244,0.00011194597,0.000044221746,0.46141714,0.00029226084,0.0018803416,0.05971461,0.00097191933,0.43666306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005338,0.00028236426,0.13893686,0.0024908416,0.0007542845,0.000046036977,0.21402887,0.00030013782,0.006275767,0.032293625,0.602759,0.0012984284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06622354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23028369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6017871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000849244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021858348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5348346","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04561.x","title":"Examining the Creation of Common Law Police Powers in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04453032803495625,"score_gpt":0.30630372237106257,"score_spread":0.2617733943361063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5348346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6640342,0.000009283375,0.0000015554281,0.0026858565,0.000032379015,0.00005305844,2.0534928e-7,0.0000027605975,0.33318073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870735,0.000006268205,0.000018787288,0.00051973376,0.000015644877,0.00000322934,2.2788554e-7,0.0000010712695,0.0007276934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995748,0.000059091173,0.00007943118,0.000041421008,0.00014717133,0.00009809836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999649,0.00021534479,0.000024815296,0.00006080587,0.000024876146,0.000025176822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001942051,0.000022234448,0.000044206503,0.0000069848584,0.00009294962,0.000015750004,0.000114838665,0.000011828559,0.00036905383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020798992,0.000015192209,0.0000058069327,0.00008529897,0.00008646548,0.00011911488,0.000011810519,0.00003005842,0.0000064114965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005512024,0.000023663326,0.19995174,0.000012475175,0.000005380866,0.0000010267152,0.052575473,0.000067105764,0.00038103652,0.7218152,0.013882327,0.011279015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012965618,0.00003655029,0.5508167,0.00006117847,0.000009411466,5.2178086e-7,0.3809479,0.00018595826,0.0008022961,0.0031167127,0.063728526,0.00016455611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71869856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010685767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021072433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40408805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W565481306","doi":"","title":"Criminal law, evidence and procedure","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis Butterworths eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Index (typography); Common law; Statement (logic); Table of contents; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08044698336053552,"score_gpt":0.32789383697281177,"score_spread":0.24744685361227625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W565481306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017589316,0.0039796457,0.000017725257,0.0016343173,0.0005295363,0.0008651527,0.000023202305,0.00031615343,0.99087536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059713714,0.0016352846,0.00033639953,0.0032235382,0.0021648987,0.0000925009,0.000015294838,0.00010347415,0.9327149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958494,0.0001933712,0.0006188542,0.0011051875,0.0012736926,0.00095952686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976485,0.00052378554,0.00038465095,0.0006354129,0.00027458623,0.00053310156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000645291,0.00065820676,0.00075269403,0.00016285668,0.0016238621,0.0003438606,0.00084271934,0.00082786666,0.00018413832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002232052,0.0006784658,0.00028027134,0.000055452834,0.002731287,0.00041798412,0.00028223783,0.0009742791,0.00026421418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001266791,0.000037892132,0.00022980972,0.0009332547,0.00008475225,0.0006882078,0.025913274,5.233678e-7,0.00001992995,0.8322827,0.12661171,0.013071234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001389175,0.00015334514,0.00013167452,0.0021821854,0.0002328254,0.00012733995,0.00045950487,0.0000016180925,0.000036363217,0.021540422,0.97412884,0.0008669422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003162176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011056342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84751713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003745696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017121539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W571158780","doi":"10.1007/0-306-48059-x","title":"Hazardous Decisions: Hazardous Waste Siting in the UK, The Netherlands and Canada. Institutions and Discourses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hazardous waste; Control (management); Competition (biology); Politics; Political science; Public administration; Quality (philosophy); Relation (database); Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Environmental planning; Engineering; Management; Economics; Waste management; Geography","score_opus":0.06383298863076835,"score_gpt":0.31571271296529835,"score_spread":0.25187972433453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W571158780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011018453,0.0069769626,0.00003775702,0.035279967,0.00034561224,0.0005737314,0.000035646248,0.000020328827,0.94571155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56320155,0.00395481,0.00004189119,0.0014361818,0.00067229534,0.000026786207,0.000008557521,0.000013170572,0.43064478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808073,0.00022613525,0.00029680945,0.00031188468,0.0007384304,0.00034602985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685663,0.0025560828,0.000114866874,0.00030330062,0.00006531642,0.00010379457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012054992,0.00020041078,0.00025351052,0.000057565394,0.0016176678,0.00043175675,0.00053993304,0.0001512435,0.0001142284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008375965,0.00010519136,0.000046706715,0.00012015002,0.0008433679,0.00012726981,0.000116211406,0.00042298983,0.0000042384545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001424717,0.000024344718,0.0017122533,0.000019679497,0.000036006564,0.00020676485,0.019006198,0.00007569388,5.02301e-7,0.30278322,0.6435049,0.032616187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009673205,0.000021135065,0.00048632614,0.00025093707,0.00006690872,0.00003663835,0.026018135,0.00003855532,1.9072094e-7,0.006294599,0.9664706,0.0002192512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6482074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5521831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017299943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015856619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W573957308","doi":"10.71781/23448","title":"Dissuasion, sécurité routière et inférence causale : le cas des actions policières contre la délinquance routière","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09390357935863057,"score_gpt":0.4311661752307846,"score_spread":0.337262595872154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W573957308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8414545,0.001849746,0.000034187073,0.006849488,0.0014929563,0.0010127977,0.00025840453,0.000013439621,0.14703448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988078,0.0012146262,0.0013413402,0.000088205736,0.00043343517,0.00010460895,0.0003468964,0.000050932253,0.09761211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623483,0.0005969671,0.00070292293,0.00096648006,0.00065709796,0.000841695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969888,0.00088122743,0.0005775398,0.0005825432,0.0005056532,0.00046429163],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001106003,0.00058616104,0.0007214582,0.00011049885,0.0025427642,0.0012512411,0.0017001613,0.0009400612,0.0028120056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074492214,0.00060477195,0.00023708228,0.0006729476,0.0015409854,0.0019696609,0.00027406786,0.0012412333,0.0010639465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042803845,0.0012332194,0.019122351,0.00029019552,0.00021567731,0.0001830358,0.37551737,0.00011753272,0.013086738,0.23755921,0.0030796048,0.34916702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004465453,0.00012787193,0.028814374,0.0013310597,0.0002955593,0.000039631803,0.093454644,0.00006962805,0.005623332,0.0022148732,0.86661434,0.00096816604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3046635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79245883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014783797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001779005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W575126043","doi":"","title":"Failing to Heed Blackstone: A 50 Year Review of Tougher Sentences for Impaired Driving in Canada and How the Judiciary Strives to Avoid Their Imposition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forum on public policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Conviction; Punishment (psychology); Politics; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.029751241814343583,"score_gpt":0.31945915372654865,"score_spread":0.2897079119122051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W575126043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6939559,0.000740926,0.00015138189,0.30296817,0.000100260615,0.0007641333,0.000028612429,0.000014412059,0.0012762033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270815,0.00055972557,0.00010930245,0.0063141533,0.00016967831,0.000019900848,0.0000025923434,0.0000069454222,0.00010955715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874777,0.000092047434,0.00019621669,0.00017985549,0.0002855471,0.0004985395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990792,0.0004055521,0.000089707966,0.00014130022,0.00009095023,0.00019327906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014513924,0.00009721835,0.0001882149,0.00013134362,0.00024482424,0.00006247427,0.0002522288,0.00003416695,0.000010062541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012261254,0.00007106485,0.00004839677,0.0005730476,0.000075754906,0.00020720786,0.00006372004,0.00007525122,0.0000011336792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005028484,0.00028472752,0.12580937,0.002463123,0.0001583255,0.000017015203,0.07038243,0.000040332132,0.006282364,0.31532773,0.20330551,0.2754262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009687996,0.0010523231,0.24269924,0.0119474875,0.000063513005,0.0000097344855,0.23569135,0.000084387,0.0025592167,0.010995431,0.49274644,0.0011820906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8475434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30433232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034888185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010516043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28979406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577856475","doi":"","title":"Portalis c. Bentham ? Les objectifs assignés à la codification du droit civil et du droit pénal en France, en Angleterre et au Canada","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006564801000858904,"score_gpt":0.19080876137318808,"score_spread":0.18424396037232918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W577856475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6883545,0.0055721533,0.0002664968,0.012444114,0.0012074255,0.00027433157,0.00017864148,0.00008608439,0.29161626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333265,0.0020892227,0.00011312629,0.00043928946,0.0006147846,0.000015363044,0.00008620205,0.000021364622,0.06329416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654734,0.0007432087,0.00040103894,0.00062176026,0.0010900012,0.0005966717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823153,0.0005434252,0.00025701994,0.00032098027,0.000198621,0.00044842204],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008305115,0.00034990243,0.00034413554,0.00010472628,0.0058947518,0.000119769415,0.0005818609,0.0003784821,0.00076619035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013111297,0.00044301304,0.00023435356,0.00044063546,0.00080135,0.0010276764,0.000110432535,0.00047971553,0.00005660686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041824882,0.00061618804,0.11102714,0.00017778635,0.0003897642,0.006121199,0.1207203,0.008097067,0.001078298,0.70495826,0.01629987,0.030095907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051944057,0.00007891555,0.18171637,0.00025595288,0.00025638813,0.00071983703,0.017451845,0.00071328494,0.00017896022,0.00052152254,0.7970506,0.0005369091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97704923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97082525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008445751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067771464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58126738","doi":"10.3406/aijc.2010.1991","title":"Vingt-cinq ans de droit pénal canadien «constitutionnalisé» : la désillusion ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.0134209020538385,"score_gpt":0.3018022740844395,"score_spread":0.288381372030601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58126738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19163628,0.0010346081,0.029890556,0.082792535,0.022482317,0.00031684816,0.00029271588,0.00018145179,0.6713727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96671784,0.0008322914,0.0022178032,0.0015930906,0.003993303,0.00002594302,0.000038861945,0.000018656126,0.024562212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969873,0.00028905546,0.00056022947,0.00057542085,0.0007155742,0.000872459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971193,0.0008467167,0.00025635742,0.00031246585,0.0008169089,0.000648238],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017482507,0.00032837852,0.00028372856,0.00021447164,0.001862301,0.00023510875,0.00097514474,0.0005193958,0.004563174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003496215,0.0003916584,0.00020482778,0.00045294204,0.0056808614,0.0012156317,0.0001783863,0.00092712557,0.0005044336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003903431,0.0002011042,0.0043838834,0.00009016778,0.000074059135,0.00039069768,0.007986858,0.0010116776,0.00080656697,0.95785874,0.022148194,0.005009004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048502072,0.00006555389,0.0035697971,0.00072891416,0.00050874485,0.001151293,0.010885882,0.004653664,0.00013345243,0.035065375,0.94218796,0.000564357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088884026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09537698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9227934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012384113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002888477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58936539","doi":"10.29173/alr28","title":"You Don't Know What You've Got 'Til It's Gone: The Rule of Law in Canada - Part I","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Expression (computer science); Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Theme (computing); Law; Historicity (philosophy); Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; History; Economics","score_opus":0.05963767548372212,"score_gpt":0.32230814965598353,"score_spread":0.2626704741722614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58936539","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076320246,0.43653888,3.7091175e-7,0.14685251,0.0013307055,0.0009698338,0.000009175283,0.000012965667,0.40665352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6306002,0.32593995,0.00003028655,0.0321986,0.0003426331,0.00011534754,0.00001633608,0.000029034532,0.010727592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979977,0.0003797998,0.0004501683,0.00024534512,0.0005366308,0.0003903728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985328,0.0005167582,0.00016656792,0.00045081347,0.00013121136,0.00020189722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014303251,0.00014862773,0.00042904515,0.000007431784,0.00019186053,0.00007957905,0.000611448,0.000051028044,0.0003940024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048127698,0.00010316755,0.00009254157,0.00027928807,0.0003457916,0.0005746062,0.00008439389,0.00014928215,0.000107750915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015365807,0.00006947294,0.0009201422,0.00092845503,0.000027357582,0.000018106637,0.007972312,0.0000043744576,0.0000019989718,0.8411819,0.120526336,0.028334185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007806229,0.000015550777,0.000029471978,0.003230522,0.00005944681,0.000002547673,0.0019534451,0.0000015144948,0.000012992962,0.00047406764,0.9940071,0.000135279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99607575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87348074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002601253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010505206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43140498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59773144","doi":"","title":"Entrapment and Equality in Terrorism Prosecutions: A Comparative Examination of North American and European Approaches","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Commit; Political science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Politics; Law; Human rights; Entrapment; Criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.060080895162219955,"score_gpt":0.3208121352356987,"score_spread":0.2607312400734787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59773144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743086,0.00021877426,0.0001780795,0.0005611911,0.000025892146,0.00010680333,8.0856915e-7,0.0000046425976,0.0014729447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900115,0.0007846647,0.00009030342,0.000008227148,0.0000556814,0.0000025298662,7.8630933e-7,0.0000024845085,0.000054196564],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987225,0.00035903312,0.00016426096,0.00010782725,0.00016293729,0.00048346564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967897,0.00005236229,0.00013580194,0.000043552605,0.000033651,0.000055641354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00282699,0.000056232937,0.00011024345,0.000052596988,0.00018762425,0.00003291784,0.00008408201,0.000012092776,0.0000017258733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058099846,0.000049912738,0.000015068005,0.00013870084,0.0004088786,0.00016875184,0.000019118002,0.0005780502,5.3137956e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056257333,0.00030448224,0.25500888,0.000020397609,0.000045522942,0.0000025351685,0.13244292,0.000004412242,0.0007073817,0.30325687,0.0000068432073,0.3081435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020228318,0.00020755493,0.944431,0.000012604458,0.000014355281,0.00002106312,0.04963371,0.000039838425,0.000047318244,0.0046327403,0.00066466717,0.000092832815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013451683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13886032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68942213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110214314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002678314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8768532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W602574368","doi":"","title":"Criminal law in Canada : an introduction to the theoretical, social and legal contexts : cases, notes and materials","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03304165243929784,"score_gpt":0.28490308997511227,"score_spread":0.2518614375358144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W602574368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39517748,0.0010834285,0.000007477888,0.034278866,0.0026059689,0.0019306917,0.00033025467,0.000069724294,0.5645161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95426726,0.00003134556,0.000011984318,0.001048156,0.0027495052,0.000021490858,0.000010219741,0.00002191312,0.04183813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831164,0.00028501623,0.00025930323,0.0004269993,0.000353175,0.00036385912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992099,0.00027475983,0.000081946266,0.00017953206,0.00007869686,0.00017517933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059002725,0.00021778453,0.00033775627,0.000038590573,0.00066794985,0.0002765566,0.00021530487,0.00017654795,0.00018319066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013435095,0.0001818131,0.000026380818,0.000020434449,0.0011580244,0.000087138294,0.000084356114,0.00024838946,0.0000045512975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054844295,0.0000044606372,0.0000032703842,0.000050152958,0.0000075250823,0.00012842393,0.007932353,2.749021e-7,0.00005538362,0.9658582,0.019147625,0.0067574913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012264874,0.00009918204,0.00008665798,0.000067173896,0.00011603961,0.000059908325,0.003558226,0.0000012939619,0.00019468159,0.0067704483,0.9885717,0.00035204808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87595135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96942407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005125936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010563936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7414123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630040309","doi":"","title":"The Criminal's Handbook: A Practical Guide to Surviving Arrest and Incarceration in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Etiquette; Guard (computer science); Criminology; Criminal justice; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Psychology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.027425894229628114,"score_gpt":0.3510637366144426,"score_spread":0.3236378423848145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630040309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060743928,0.023702223,0.0012090829,0.24293728,0.0080126785,0.0014760564,0.000014813981,0.00006694957,0.661837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38391486,0.013968361,0.00039395478,0.014356116,0.0029964566,0.00017768505,0.00004483094,0.000054011136,0.58409375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975943,0.00071360264,0.00034740893,0.0003123556,0.0004585523,0.0005737882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567145,0.0035706689,0.00009032713,0.00013269788,0.000057884707,0.0004769865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025431833,0.00015571262,0.00033511568,0.000060254795,0.00047061444,0.00003154241,0.00020940448,0.0005294051,0.00032375322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040810173,0.000119767064,0.00002021676,0.000049770944,0.0011057612,0.00006787046,0.00020291988,0.00067160174,0.000014627788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003301309,0.000064127256,0.032821395,0.00016211419,0.000087069886,0.00179,0.013267979,6.423398e-7,0.000004728537,0.6057892,0.22051616,0.12516646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024279852,0.00010669341,0.010271146,0.00018328674,0.000093544026,0.00023865256,0.0016286627,0.000033166998,0.0000013978645,0.009039312,0.977895,0.00026633835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8856847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99808884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7573788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039488327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005627399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63443872","doi":"","title":"21. An Equality-Oriented Approach to the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence in Sexual Assault Prosecutions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.14263734055100932,"score_gpt":0.383432579460353,"score_spread":0.24079523890934365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63443872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643351,0.0005303526,0.0113088535,0.084950514,0.0020094414,0.004278211,0.0005283405,0.00020684306,0.031852297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930389,0.000033861943,0.0013689182,0.0038290888,0.0006261058,0.00038352548,0.00017292156,0.000013872185,0.00053280516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995431,0.0013712718,0.0006713572,0.0005425397,0.0013099473,0.0006739018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974858,0.000519165,0.0002505493,0.0006761519,0.0005295908,0.00053873635],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065422645,0.00022862751,0.0003283763,0.0001251413,0.00093285734,0.00014999988,0.00075955427,0.00019735676,0.0007823404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026396944,0.00019057197,0.00009046708,0.00097249256,0.00041539047,0.014423863,0.00015943465,0.00035360368,0.000186231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053821626,0.004245659,0.031616535,0.0002831572,0.000053373547,0.0000049444257,0.041472446,0.00070294784,0.0018641775,0.89576167,0.015770556,0.00768631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008393372,0.0007541849,0.6901522,0.0005219738,0.0001591478,0.000013394927,0.06999755,0.0003236929,0.0028754582,0.0025552264,0.23066619,0.0011416095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005259644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021849032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8932065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030756302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004098381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644065874","doi":"10.5040/9781474202220","title":"Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11068102907618442,"score_gpt":0.3713923294949639,"score_spread":0.2607113004187795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644065874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015354145,0.00035577576,0.000013972393,0.0017547318,0.0006200817,0.0004444881,0.000022683074,0.0001429302,0.9964918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0767175,0.000010782106,0.00016637,0.0013833112,0.0013371505,0.000020330757,0.000026364009,0.000034226337,0.92030394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972585,0.00020778028,0.00039842978,0.0005861413,0.0008757537,0.00067341904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981246,0.0006377136,0.00024418056,0.00030810025,0.00044841113,0.00023698296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022734192,0.00029671346,0.0005335404,0.00028491975,0.0005271676,0.0019628108,0.0008519674,0.0005954946,0.00023364887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003561017,0.00031939888,0.00016794726,0.00008830053,0.0010370839,0.0013975387,0.00015596945,0.0013279354,0.00016907857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022156573,0.000011386155,0.000012148408,0.0000109213,0.000011745655,0.000054486067,0.039660797,7.6722307e-7,0.000003197952,0.7916366,0.16825625,0.0003195598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014643946,0.000023154287,0.000049017184,0.00034545062,0.00002284935,0.000002182857,0.010991479,0.0000013547182,0.00002427015,0.08354014,0.904507,0.00034667575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04366384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22055161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73625076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019526258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013986846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648019763","doi":"","title":"The Law of Public Inquiries in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06595487874010127,"score_gpt":0.30445275902244706,"score_spread":0.2384978802823458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648019763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005575394,0.0008140568,0.0000020997961,0.01063935,0.00014566588,0.000081155165,0.0000017609436,0.000006163025,0.988254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10525142,0.00046120564,0.000007941079,0.000538788,0.00012147103,0.0000020958294,0.0000019116922,0.0000035146556,0.89361167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990154,0.00007003295,0.00017829443,0.00009400501,0.00042478985,0.00021746039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.00038276412,0.00007508922,0.00013528425,0.00007400477,0.000054025935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005478314,0.000067163215,0.00013809075,0.000015596166,0.00023042494,0.00005259483,0.0004031999,0.000071404414,0.00016157725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013279243,0.000045562283,0.000029771625,0.000060028313,0.0012363212,0.00008686464,0.00002753684,0.00012487057,0.0000051625198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.569602e-7,0.0000012157842,0.00004012174,0.000004209228,0.0000016334748,0.0000023548703,0.0004114386,1.17172256e-7,3.642752e-8,0.81320137,0.18273018,0.003606585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012452459,0.0000059645736,0.00006530446,0.00003091992,0.000002972697,1.1380423e-7,0.002416044,1.9298272e-7,0.0000013679185,0.030720327,0.96668637,0.000057999372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78395617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000653316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009973183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W651559902","doi":"","title":"Youth crime and youth justice : comparative and cross-national perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.14706786000808927,"score_gpt":0.4097403561255992,"score_spread":0.26267249611751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W651559902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012731709,0.0030248312,0.00005199816,0.00035981575,0.00013511535,0.00021576363,0.00017250476,0.000055962304,0.99471086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36137077,0.00034143773,0.00016031085,0.000119342534,0.00050778495,0.0000020581515,0.000027961407,0.000008934935,0.6374614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857646,0.000055429187,0.00016498305,0.0004203731,0.00055887323,0.00022390549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990826,0.0001799244,0.00009899156,0.000074539814,0.0004051542,0.00015875365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037519966,0.00019782309,0.00026975072,0.00006535524,0.0007646518,0.00032567244,0.0001455283,0.00019818712,0.00020861208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015405957,0.0001814685,0.000048539056,0.000047788424,0.0016783661,0.0003089243,0.00007397963,0.00023128932,0.00002608126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019531735,0.000015203162,0.000030107922,0.000031561205,0.000020692383,0.0000012257083,0.33775252,0.0000028853071,2.5139602e-7,0.66082233,0.0012754839,0.000028188073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000668443,0.00017281069,0.0037305672,0.000423444,0.0008252458,0.0000069863786,0.82523197,0.000008817147,0.000005256478,0.07992517,0.08800044,0.0010008402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023965437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013026126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58089715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004749756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017309694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74000704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658376493","doi":"","title":"La preuve électronique : étude de droit comparé Afrique, Europe, Afrique [i.e. Canada]","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03559857921521,"score_gpt":0.27501662936261584,"score_spread":0.23941805014740583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658376493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024581195,0.0014173816,0.0012992644,0.0047296206,0.00062431383,0.00069426297,0.00006770075,0.00017789763,0.9885314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37143442,0.0019951698,0.00066828146,0.0010754925,0.0006314162,0.000050137533,0.000023954852,0.00008589606,0.62403524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940549,0.0015883641,0.00076607784,0.0009610714,0.00094724144,0.0016823374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641544,0.0011112228,0.000424967,0.00066255894,0.00048116906,0.000904629],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019987323,0.00074711937,0.00090827356,0.00009108765,0.00071846467,0.00017566634,0.0017146415,0.00096241105,0.0067399936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035431955,0.0008036668,0.00026519856,0.0003965694,0.0014679285,0.0003621089,0.00030265862,0.0017828501,0.00035478343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047161047,0.000100852405,0.00040959203,0.00019870116,0.00010147917,0.00032834618,0.0054139947,0.000015102248,0.00002904455,0.80971164,0.18229917,0.0013449119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012770928,0.00016384345,0.0019393644,0.00049828674,0.00018237245,0.00007141002,0.00067199254,0.000040837338,0.00029469424,0.021365315,0.97367203,0.00097215537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94555646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79137284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049242782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019300392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6917657969","doi":"10.58066/wrbe-kc83","title":"British Columbia Blackout - No. 84","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blackout; Directory; Poison control; Freedom of information","score_opus":0.04156115123080675,"score_gpt":0.3060355223850873,"score_spread":0.2644743711542805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6917657969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211478,0.00014452457,0.0000064409396,0.00040967762,0.00039406508,0.00013643019,0.0000018274561,0.0001390602,0.07762017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7845176,0.0006470828,0.000052961837,0.000002938274,0.00033489405,3.8256198e-7,0.0000039319043,0.0000069810912,0.21443327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770516,0.00060561433,0.00009059811,0.00029847593,0.00083326694,0.00046688897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984286,0.0005287665,0.000056108493,0.00013832035,0.00057891227,0.00026931782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001881945,0.000051633153,0.00015366454,0.00008384393,0.0029339145,0.00037364365,0.0003378869,0.00012562342,0.00081295357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068601273,0.00009483022,0.00005669159,0.00062637223,0.0009525431,0.0003180734,0.00019891452,0.0005302325,0.00023933528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022004987,0.00016843737,0.4620618,0.00035174986,0.00011035355,0.0014440354,0.05230561,0.000033429333,0.0055149985,0.0010611045,0.46496984,0.011758568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022997615,0.00027962704,0.077271454,0.0001393279,0.000009589034,0.0000072365087,0.029923264,0.000113721166,0.000007131991,0.00030951315,0.89157486,0.00013429199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24057469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06336903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42660502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009541553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022471619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920597455","doi":"10.60770/pev6-vx16","title":"A Comprehensive Analysis of Section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Evolving Evidentiary Rule","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Constitution; Criticism; Test (biology); State (computer science); Scope (computer science); Section (typography)","score_opus":0.020749477452289097,"score_gpt":0.28555443043237116,"score_spread":0.26480495298008205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920597455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919668,0.0028670274,0.000012233424,0.0021186378,0.00029121168,0.00013729185,0.000012561415,0.0000058453547,0.0025883913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950653,0.000056449157,0.000013149075,0.000036713427,0.00005430207,0.0000029620649,7.0967076e-7,0.0000022352049,0.0003269542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921334,0.00014824102,0.00017982976,0.00012363204,0.00023093722,0.00010401682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993254,0.00028638743,0.00008099448,0.00014268623,0.00011734827,0.00004721741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004511429,0.000051818457,0.00017809395,0.00011095562,0.00029580374,0.000051766772,0.000112152666,0.000043647142,0.00008194631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007482152,0.000029980207,0.00010049394,0.0004901298,0.0007653329,0.0001278046,0.00003597318,0.000071769064,5.5727213e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024143116,0.00011350003,0.24330749,0.0014950733,0.0056513213,0.000052930467,0.533111,0.00037946278,0.017633457,0.17208898,0.018994829,0.0069305836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007463367,0.0001091435,0.8741373,0.001208559,0.0064311936,0.000019877183,0.021466998,0.0153150335,0.0028986493,0.027437063,0.049791176,0.00043868416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7702883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80686545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6308298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033796543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010203033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2819901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6961026974","doi":"10.14288/1.0400188","title":"British Columbia’s Bicycle Helmet Charter Challenge : Regina vs. van der Eerden (April 2011 – January 2013)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01767324015405441,"score_gpt":0.21486857433805512,"score_spread":0.1971953341840007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6961026974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501395,0.002179229,0.00006330627,0.008099612,0.00054125517,0.00036269685,0.00018055977,0.0001659192,0.03826791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265238,0.0040723025,0.00029479776,0.00025365571,0.00022254161,0.0000020662885,0.000037047652,0.000025113532,0.06856869],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997272,0.00029190155,0.00019633709,0.00079432316,0.00073241163,0.00071302353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982459,0.00010561562,0.00018346382,0.00048779708,0.0005676431,0.00040955967],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005728101,0.00007942436,0.00047662202,0.000034862074,0.0010903209,0.00079075916,0.00073243026,0.00028950674,0.008280332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009797802,0.0003634365,0.00028178206,0.00036542572,0.0008675334,0.0010846594,0.00031307884,0.0002869919,0.0003152562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011398474,0.00031974772,0.014712898,0.00013134937,0.00008321891,0.0021347704,0.0021454243,0.0000010914897,0.00005733064,0.000013094355,0.6461705,0.33421916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064116943,0.00009123553,0.79518783,0.00033696488,0.00010376165,0.000123676,0.009581405,0.000012477303,5.090829e-7,0.0011431962,0.1923549,0.00042287153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89081705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99407643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7804749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017292672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042411135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981259741","doi":"","title":"The economic agent and its representation(s)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Paris; Région Normandie; University of Cape Town; Université de Montréal; Université de Strasbourg; Simon Fraser University; Helsingin Yliopisto; University of Hertfordshire; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; University of Oxford; Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne; Università degli Studi di Milano; George Mason University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.05723648447475314,"score_gpt":0.33827749870104384,"score_spread":0.2810410142262907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981259741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057574634,0.0030345612,0.00001871437,0.047921605,0.003166107,0.0007917165,0.00032218685,0.0001500348,0.9445375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007645439,0.0072683343,0.00007873125,0.0035588313,0.0035581812,0.0002854432,0.0005177994,0.00014093489,0.9769463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979621,0.00031097463,0.00032068847,0.00048408622,0.0005615184,0.00036060886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865735,0.00024092445,0.0003307569,0.00034083714,0.00014172346,0.00028840397],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009629002,0.00023690355,0.0002687712,0.00009939956,0.001055624,0.0005336118,0.0004893357,0.0002490721,0.009564004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002857972,0.00020373597,0.00007383719,0.00012992343,0.0003781158,0.0028192627,0.00013809327,0.00018667523,0.0043703625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128174215,0.000009818975,0.0000044276912,0.000012180256,0.000023731287,0.0000072014514,0.00017774772,0.0000038058688,0.00000159466,0.19453736,0.80388194,0.0013273667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021313617,0.000032856686,0.00015913142,0.00012027175,0.000055166067,0.0000059388676,0.001080123,0.000013033571,0.00001756223,0.0025970917,0.9954381,0.00026756505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025840811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07424314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19194026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031654275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005193944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981658142","doi":"","title":"ESPN-TV! Edmonton Oilers vs Buffalo Sabres Live Streaming","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Identification (biology); Key (lock); Terminal (telecommunication)","score_opus":0.021829603843049612,"score_gpt":0.2957765725151596,"score_spread":0.27394696867211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981658142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010035445,0.00004277432,0.00004681494,0.0009876142,0.0011059325,0.001141312,0.00007303403,0.00059145293,0.9950075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011273953,0.0015279084,0.00047968372,0.00023148103,0.0007325818,0.0003321326,0.000053363674,0.00033884315,0.98503006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924838,0.0015249788,0.00062052865,0.0029419202,0.0014192032,0.0010095731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945218,0.0008446583,0.0006356216,0.0034048175,0.000109037064,0.00048404845],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050565917,0.00060489087,0.00078529504,0.00033453133,0.0009275932,0.00032519776,0.0027692171,0.00064648944,0.95484465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003604044,0.00072445156,0.00043813107,0.00036744695,0.00070132915,0.0002939401,0.00228375,0.0010655496,0.6371059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010233835,0.00024214241,0.00485699,0.00019630008,0.00021345029,0.000108858505,0.014547255,0.00007295194,0.00008222312,0.005524803,0.95476425,0.01928842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002332595,0.0000023373345,0.0010190846,0.00029528048,0.00015498714,0.000007996302,0.004855285,0.000012511765,0.000052548243,0.0009952725,0.99164945,0.00072197453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10586389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03383034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3177388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010041463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068033626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981764086","doi":"","title":"Extradition and Trial Delays: Recent Developments (and Lessons?) from Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Paragraph; Charter; Human rights; State (computer science); Odds; Fair trial; Bad faith","score_opus":0.05376176113869135,"score_gpt":0.31137781618601656,"score_spread":0.2576160550473252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981764086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754228,0.00050891127,0.000022625454,0.006327187,0.001043936,0.00021810592,0.000026082664,0.000030502959,0.016399864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642515,0.00052614306,0.00067714666,0.00095779344,0.0008381963,0.000014079825,0.000010327334,0.0000070046103,0.0005441303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988202,0.000115644696,0.00017534613,0.00027322292,0.00034901925,0.00026657697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993239,0.00013710909,0.000059185655,0.00010956113,0.00008491548,0.00028534792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000367,0.000098153956,0.0001306104,0.000014186257,0.0008003598,0.00014723286,0.00013466211,0.00007387093,0.00052886485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022862863,0.000097520875,0.000013302719,0.00009029936,0.00029999067,0.00028557325,0.000042865413,0.0001061765,0.00003309404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008639971,0.00028710678,0.021565504,0.00007123334,0.00024410522,0.00016690638,0.021043155,0.0000012212713,0.0015825701,0.5198588,0.19391142,0.23262802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024519328,0.00007035883,0.010176445,0.00006188737,0.000025583657,0.0000016513595,0.0012250496,0.0000030068113,0.00035159127,0.005969376,0.9794468,0.00021631386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89530754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97868574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7855354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018231591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000615787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61558014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981782572","doi":"","title":"+91-9116799099 family problem solution specialist in ottawa","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bengali; MAGIC (telescope); Cheating; Kali; Phone","score_opus":0.033605578069996214,"score_gpt":0.30930744935841903,"score_spread":0.27570187128842283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981782572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004921149,0.000042112366,0.00029800207,0.001185193,0.0010146592,0.0012429437,0.000023621995,0.00025003406,0.99545133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00558563,0.0012260916,0.0017280797,0.0002044009,0.00094144006,0.00021801259,0.000052306834,0.00021835364,0.98982567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993216,0.0014626597,0.0007622573,0.0026449417,0.0010127365,0.00090140017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962279,0.00027162093,0.0004915723,0.0025385085,0.00014466346,0.0003257225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060789664,0.00048390715,0.0007440704,0.00034792462,0.00033665125,0.00030150852,0.001652559,0.0008771391,0.73035556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023233062,0.00059288496,0.00030719704,0.00058525905,0.0005942543,0.0002193958,0.0010681095,0.0008320039,0.46823737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035709723,0.00035313566,0.0039953203,0.00032872052,0.00008442159,0.00014639682,0.0038297528,0.00003394238,0.0006188269,0.02162528,0.9506032,0.01834528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002665985,6.8443865e-7,0.0040192967,0.000919907,0.000053402626,0.0000057381735,0.0008158866,0.000011856487,0.00008437267,0.0024846196,0.9907507,0.0005869677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10352273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26211816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082545937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009136501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986900776","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Public law; Comparative law; International law; Principle of legality; Philosophy of law; Proportionality (law)","score_opus":0.10143523433243229,"score_gpt":0.35782855323386004,"score_spread":0.25639331890142775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986900776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18636641,0.0010717795,0.00021540014,0.10156992,0.00035018843,0.00024796886,0.00001112402,0.000022911945,0.7101443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719644,0.000037977865,0.00063360936,0.0014784078,0.0003762597,0.0000043923433,0.0000025578954,0.0000049416794,0.0002654183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988267,0.00020448737,0.00015809968,0.00014364945,0.0003886007,0.00027845375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991334,0.00046675061,0.00004170766,0.00008923209,0.000091855356,0.00017703795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014816,0.00008832161,0.000103585226,0.00008249998,0.00035111618,0.00009598383,0.00033037463,0.000063882915,0.00055740087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013932367,0.000068006986,0.00004398096,0.00011676041,0.0007126135,0.0007038254,0.000015907623,0.00015213448,0.0000035967662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019579804,0.000028743536,0.00039458298,0.00000778762,0.000006849536,0.0000025279512,0.1769158,9.740731e-7,0.000010243779,0.8222539,0.000075636395,0.00028337148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022018082,0.000043097978,0.009968753,0.00003780472,0.00007235879,0.000020275307,0.14464612,0.000008363365,0.000027980663,0.82365316,0.02113512,0.00016680243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31138933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5782901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81083006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011195981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024653325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6931962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986925560","doi":"","title":"Release: 35th biennial Canadian Congress on Criminal Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.03453229721784231,"score_gpt":0.2738991105888982,"score_spread":0.2393668133710559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986925560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002606745,0.00035067007,0.000014940976,0.3846836,0.0010824188,0.0001634826,0.00011237697,0.00007624448,0.6132556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000803658,0.0006311525,0.0002978636,0.00008796025,0.00042366097,1.3553696e-7,0.000018486891,0.00006350958,0.9976736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984445,0.00015360395,0.000011308631,0.00034033376,0.00058655936,0.0004636754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856186,0.000059559017,0.00020214372,0.00032452107,0.0001872533,0.0006646626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033076713,0.00018633177,0.00030966967,0.00038136073,0.00044005355,0.000029823897,0.00064750016,0.00038459882,0.00034831895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015275086,0.00024251542,0.000090780406,0.0002792646,0.00077540864,0.0001456436,0.00004645153,0.00026241987,0.00043434327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039066377,0.000009829425,0.000012405719,0.00008485525,0.000020828007,0.00025585818,0.0017509945,0.0000023946754,7.08692e-7,0.019460121,0.9778609,0.00050203345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020240061,0.000092013965,0.000009139712,0.00031718687,0.00040783768,0.0000026041735,0.039956197,0.000004156026,3.6813847e-7,0.000006232553,0.95875096,0.00025088544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2613098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9193424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65803266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042051208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017455382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986970546","doi":"","title":"R v Fearon Case Commentary","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Law enforcement; Data Protection Act 1998; Search and seizure; Permission; Enforcement; Criminal law","score_opus":0.2618415846451397,"score_gpt":0.395712819689144,"score_spread":0.13387123504400433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986970546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98901683,0.000103964485,0.00009667538,0.006416462,0.00047705788,0.00021849932,0.000013265305,0.00018870772,0.0034685412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98881596,0.000040750914,0.000044707245,0.0013991527,0.00026824628,6.104161e-7,0.000008170268,0.000019088242,0.0094033005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780625,0.0005648593,0.00016512022,0.00038975987,0.00054047146,0.0005335235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985062,0.00012981895,0.00010447245,0.00036692622,0.00019029161,0.00070231396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009694171,0.00019401377,0.00021324836,0.00020531511,0.0007161266,0.00029915827,0.00066613656,0.00016488296,0.00005629816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100921345,0.00022806595,0.0000997578,0.00042328404,0.00033145014,0.002223925,0.00028256333,0.00038020406,0.0004595435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009887591,0.00008737244,0.9832983,0.000015646901,0.000025034318,0.0076699685,0.007045812,0.000006344853,0.000025007803,0.0006788267,0.00014428313,0.0009045441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021125663,0.0003776027,0.1899529,0.00023104013,0.0002504378,0.00079673965,0.047780175,2.717664e-7,0.000409398,0.000860688,0.7561219,0.0011063215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008400535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06041764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7933454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000516855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019791577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95672727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989525816","doi":"","title":"Beaudry: New Impetus Towards Equality in Law Enforcement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegation; Supreme court; Conviction; Officer; Suspect; Criminal justice; Discretion; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.04820206146596288,"score_gpt":0.3517665639408504,"score_spread":0.3035645024748875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989525816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13290267,0.0007605003,0.00079465937,0.0045793448,0.00093239284,0.00047003257,0.000008185404,0.0001767375,0.8593755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880559,0.00007903801,0.00069003843,0.0026801557,0.00075135997,0.000008573563,0.000006031505,0.000013724368,0.0077152224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973489,0.000164567,0.00047249076,0.00038170133,0.00077834434,0.00085399504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986998,0.00016554237,0.00010235124,0.0003473776,0.00007389761,0.00061103894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033211312,0.00018030967,0.00026098138,0.000049160775,0.00046988158,0.00018149418,0.00049724075,0.0001691426,0.0017531723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025123882,0.00018169431,0.00011598594,0.00035792013,0.00045604614,0.000580515,0.00011820665,0.0003185272,0.0005158918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005088361,0.00004690838,0.0017222214,0.000015242764,0.0000070619217,0.000027018965,0.0029708603,0.000007748515,0.00016792867,0.9874847,0.0025881443,0.004911271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040278275,0.00006965366,0.0023712467,0.00006640238,0.000014836639,0.0000013427538,0.002485896,0.0000026746445,0.0013788784,0.022931738,0.9699863,0.0002882231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48978367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47473553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96739817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043286575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037952184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989666937","doi":"","title":"Canadian Evidence Law in a Nutshell","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Supreme court; Common law; Statutory law; Subject (documents); Comparative law; Public law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.06565954398396258,"score_gpt":0.34215800116699735,"score_spread":0.2764984571830348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989666937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05796386,0.0005606883,0.0000042616693,0.021963673,0.00010699016,0.00013728983,7.970542e-7,0.000033366672,0.9192291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891687,0.000041227908,0.00007274093,0.002828255,0.00008774425,0.0000022969953,1.4115186e-7,0.0000018636263,0.0077970247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993129,0.000048900318,0.00008226049,0.00011783904,0.00014939888,0.000288694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961656,0.000060242237,0.000013407567,0.00010023597,0.000022464465,0.00018711523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003792806,0.000044209726,0.00006197716,0.000038443326,0.00020054937,0.00005669066,0.0001881523,0.000046052337,0.00012273993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011369705,0.00004625716,0.000022118347,0.00007790392,0.000078004465,0.00019580741,0.0000055084597,0.00007485372,0.00013611288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007043063,0.000008849622,0.001761276,0.000003016655,6.074251e-7,0.0000723441,0.0069828015,0.0000021517108,0.00010020164,0.97695345,0.00464756,0.009460725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006509119,0.000049468752,0.010627163,0.00020034495,0.0000046606406,0.0000017230603,0.001166402,0.0000082466695,0.00010186913,0.035468735,0.9521415,0.0001647781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8847848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98576784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023376125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038537348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18863122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990498251","doi":"","title":"De rol van de slachtofferadvocaat in het Nederlandse strafproces","year":2023,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Ven; European union; Holy See","score_opus":0.054110371793363365,"score_gpt":0.30884665580960213,"score_spread":0.25473628401623877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990498251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5487032,0.009297007,0.0014015585,0.0109890625,0.0025700917,0.0027434581,0.004979459,0.0013205482,0.4179956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92892134,0.027581368,0.0005277645,0.0011132519,0.0023693948,0.000033189015,0.002223342,0.0001871369,0.037043218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503005,0.00040939508,0.0007807448,0.0015158362,0.00070527004,0.0015586988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964014,0.0013669571,0.0003765044,0.0011959326,0.00005575003,0.0006034505],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027529323,0.0007595657,0.0008650806,0.00023910118,0.0011398717,0.00072313746,0.0031045643,0.00046702285,0.00018320515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070745904,0.00074945367,0.00013444408,0.00027153283,0.0005246399,0.00079178903,0.0014563962,0.001118275,0.00018314095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024642802,0.00045801417,0.17978859,0.0136447,0.0013753835,0.0034107207,0.3663169,0.009298052,0.00068633456,0.092700854,0.011769069,0.31808707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001793803,0.0006063863,0.05658677,0.020798009,0.0013981347,0.00019889417,0.049961124,0.28067178,0.000015235706,0.099165365,0.4841062,0.0046983054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024221033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13873026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47233713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012206278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003407676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991875723","doi":"","title":"Independence and the Director of\\nPublic Prosecutions: The Marshall Inquiry\\nand Beyond","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Nova scotia; Government (linguistics); Control (management)","score_opus":0.026859682381086165,"score_gpt":0.2954902920246089,"score_spread":0.26863060964352276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991875723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8419433,0.0050360085,0.000013399908,0.02698474,0.00039364063,0.00085859594,0.000012684898,0.00008368708,0.124673896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906955,0.0010397991,0.00006837095,0.0013195984,0.0003283609,0.00006108889,0.0000012540897,0.000008570437,0.0064774794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813193,0.00042663646,0.00025676316,0.00026015632,0.00058690197,0.00033759192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872875,0.0005576404,0.00009278942,0.0003624938,0.00011542572,0.00014289038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018924775,0.00012535775,0.00019162957,0.000020934584,0.0011385186,0.00026946282,0.0005958974,0.00010610453,0.0014539517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004463032,0.00007254726,0.000079391284,0.0003143107,0.0023925707,0.0006678814,0.00008034548,0.0002958027,0.0001119642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015076938,0.000054548957,0.0042214105,0.000025214138,0.0000277374,0.000004704836,0.011935168,0.00000580139,0.00007388635,0.96802783,0.004712085,0.010760852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008785642,0.00006687685,0.016848618,0.00010642943,0.000077136785,0.000014194558,0.005361732,0.00002177755,0.00016920846,0.041278742,0.93489975,0.00027700097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014500714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012674242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93018764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038140566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015876489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992022858","doi":"","title":"Jailed by a \"black box\" : the impact of opaque algorithms on the right to a fair trial in the United States of America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to a fair trial; Fair trial; Opacity; New Right","score_opus":0.023238055569076,"score_gpt":0.2822950404001226,"score_spread":0.2590569848310466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992022858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98122233,0.000033369848,0.00029029342,0.0092475945,0.00036206163,0.0006781153,0.00009491008,0.0000107800915,0.00806052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992205,0.000022630693,0.000054462693,0.00006358776,0.00008696633,0.0000040800237,0.000011061265,0.0000025821842,0.0005341501],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792963,0.00075505587,0.0001528089,0.00016511988,0.0008209005,0.00017650623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849707,0.00081305543,0.0002325405,0.0002553547,0.0001484518,0.00005350789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000976894,0.00009009972,0.00017609217,0.0000847787,0.0013050374,0.000018073148,0.00084805937,0.000039889128,0.00012300441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020542186,0.000059415765,0.00016491143,0.00083554944,0.0011280199,0.00013779453,0.00013139578,0.00023285921,0.0000022151748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02635301,0.001915914,0.0025362188,0.000051789077,0.00041852397,0.00015285905,0.38310552,0.13567743,0.0044811335,0.2570386,0.18785696,0.0004120692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071511166,0.0042122086,0.008874134,0.00020301624,0.00021494919,0.000013870701,0.4247823,0.004437831,0.00081604085,0.0028408892,0.5459107,0.0005429435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0677154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059470715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35805374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036975936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006209609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992542321","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v St. Clair&lt;/i&gt;","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Test (biology); Officer; Subpoena; Expert witness","score_opus":0.024858842165407805,"score_gpt":0.28581118991880666,"score_spread":0.26095234775339887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992542321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26279804,0.0047331867,0.00009420367,0.022061514,0.0037813087,0.0008610092,0.0001643008,0.0007363733,0.7047701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594747,0.00014480924,0.00031460117,0.0022912738,0.0008883866,0.000115556075,0.000027178525,0.0000316372,0.036711894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965328,0.0005078231,0.00034141302,0.0005323515,0.0012307807,0.00085481064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985102,0.00024236257,0.00013036284,0.0005059857,0.000108663284,0.0005024437],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016963487,0.00020776279,0.00027774015,0.000065832355,0.0029390398,0.00023446078,0.0009765667,0.00010655601,0.018965805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003219862,0.00022749146,0.00019415883,0.000543199,0.00043470366,0.00054319546,0.00036463368,0.0004646799,0.0012000581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044522276,0.00010304872,0.00038791588,0.000016191934,0.000019062783,0.00006710215,0.00191144,0.00006487262,0.0017793869,0.79349613,0.20061447,0.0014958647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023007102,0.00010609291,0.0005804936,0.000018966453,0.00003153041,0.0000070786127,0.0011512995,0.000015869375,0.00007971279,0.007787898,0.9896774,0.00031358303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035934288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036946118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7890629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004268644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004117263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995820580","doi":"","title":"Placing Expediency Before Principle: An Empirical Analysis of the Joint Sentencing Practices of Canadian Crown Prosecutors and Defence Lawyers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Crown (dentistry); Relevance (law); Criminal justice; Empirical research","score_opus":0.048378754794063276,"score_gpt":0.3556598089897825,"score_spread":0.3072810541957192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995820580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867779,0.00019250954,0.000025150468,0.002561692,0.00017916912,0.00024107688,0.000014692738,0.00001892332,0.009988857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861836,0.00003934826,0.0005206345,0.00033642925,0.00004809555,0.000010799182,0.0000017884277,0.0000051275715,0.0004194355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982124,0.00026418964,0.00038796745,0.0003304152,0.00044150744,0.00036352803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985349,0.00020986973,0.00039539003,0.00036796927,0.00020403501,0.0002877902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011606027,0.00012234028,0.0003031914,0.0003157083,0.0007497302,0.00009811729,0.00040852203,0.000103993414,0.00008251405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002084044,0.00009538281,0.00012548419,0.0020591954,0.0006478011,0.00058109645,0.000108313376,0.00021106303,0.0000012218209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030376681,0.00006062826,0.8105891,0.000118007105,0.00018951201,0.0000074616332,0.030606037,0.00013475702,0.00087247614,0.15657231,0.00019241407,0.0006269229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033444216,0.00021483042,0.82843894,0.0008092638,0.0018814247,0.000004358176,0.10832173,0.0010066167,0.0040926305,0.0035269875,0.050838683,0.0005300748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72412384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.962893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23876919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016938693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008769727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5766394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998620211","doi":"","title":"Annual Review of Criminal Law 2020","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Criminal law; Criminal code; Criminal justice; Legislation; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.02863176121537044,"score_gpt":0.324158980091506,"score_spread":0.2955272188761356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998620211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020745443,0.14002332,0.000053468826,0.034550995,0.0014339456,0.0005096321,0.00021279963,0.0001752855,0.8022951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92023194,0.037712134,0.0021545135,0.02215658,0.0014880366,0.000033891123,0.000033001466,0.00003306199,0.01615684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803734,0.0003087508,0.00035975716,0.0003099053,0.0006246386,0.00035962663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986586,0.00016138362,0.00011584722,0.0003497051,0.00043520826,0.0002792805],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086924987,0.00012601324,0.0003242885,0.000010597501,0.00037085655,0.000045756035,0.0003639835,0.00008721361,0.004123822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007034142,0.00012704362,0.00017249015,0.00031631647,0.000452594,0.00044950997,0.00010574319,0.00021044149,0.00044864675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014421237,0.00008024736,0.00013663195,0.0017521057,0.000017315802,0.00011907762,0.0014402239,6.604223e-7,0.00026396324,0.9337782,0.060829427,0.0015677115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010201821,0.000039979655,0.00019123538,0.0023519788,0.00008966384,0.000011921023,0.002690517,3.954471e-7,0.0010674264,0.002450851,0.9908316,0.00017238063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011867637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018875187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93132734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059282847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035049653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999564576","doi":"","title":"Cornell: A Divided Court Accords Too Much Latitude to the Police – 'Canada Is Not a Police State'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intimidation; Charter; Warrant; Jurisprudence; Entitlement (fair division); Suspect; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Criminal justice","score_opus":0.027437953519445342,"score_gpt":0.3013234704882355,"score_spread":0.27388551696879015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999564576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9018916,0.000038435508,0.00005052362,0.067782834,0.0013948495,0.00059034256,0.00013614885,0.0001245573,0.027990734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505162,0.000024249879,0.00029563162,0.038357493,0.001039934,0.000049960006,0.0000033813249,0.000026384392,0.00968676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711615,0.00016808177,0.0003427892,0.000478006,0.0010230013,0.00087197707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768674,0.00046158288,0.00012424035,0.0007301964,0.0002598292,0.0007374258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009952636,0.0002469287,0.00027193158,0.00003720388,0.0012914198,0.00047343347,0.0013013466,0.000121873774,0.001163177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037615935,0.00019965191,0.000103376806,0.0004983373,0.00031430888,0.00044848016,0.00023072067,0.0005898638,0.0007243949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016844159,0.00013359258,0.012733113,0.00004366159,0.00008478685,0.000024184059,0.044111945,0.00007399546,0.002902392,0.12211564,0.8146168,0.0029914705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018938967,0.000038114955,0.015041182,0.000024789992,0.000031792337,0.0000044189983,0.0024335617,0.00002405033,0.00076932757,0.00080768025,0.98029405,0.00034166852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99785274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16567725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001997277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001185115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000505167","doi":"","title":"Europees Hof tikt België opnieuw op de vingers voor fnuiken gerechtsjournalistiek","year":2023,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.05394763368925882,"score_gpt":0.28618626676981335,"score_spread":0.23223863308055454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000505167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7664851,0.004111696,0.0028310488,0.03425667,0.004729316,0.002103742,0.0011947936,0.0025278765,0.18175974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67084885,0.22763096,0.0002534652,0.00058706815,0.00080637605,5.381854e-7,0.00008424868,0.00009331985,0.09969519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191135,0.001595765,0.00058823876,0.0015385757,0.0019027214,0.0024633554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953937,0.0008133689,0.0007773678,0.00072144606,0.00055041513,0.0017437326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022176076,0.0008401483,0.0008648348,0.037157282,0.0036212178,0.00032922137,0.004143159,0.001210219,0.0012233247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013942953,0.0010945983,0.0013374385,0.08632755,0.0021781547,0.0027507583,0.0015145495,0.0026503033,0.0011970251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012329114,0.0004268636,0.114396535,0.00041096428,0.0012941065,0.0050550555,0.014908708,0.00065745856,0.0013696566,0.061887484,0.79577976,0.0025805132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014470431,0.0002478566,0.023312211,0.000677685,0.0012606379,0.000021226064,0.045182135,0.00018935453,0.00007766989,0.0008678436,0.9254493,0.0012670476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074931984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005996107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22351927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087597413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007087441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000840301","doi":"","title":"Hart: More Positive Steps Needed to Rein In Mr. Big Undercover Operations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Balance (ability); Autonomy; Supreme court; Big data; Guard (computer science); State (computer science); Worry","score_opus":0.029876852699220077,"score_gpt":0.31170426600205003,"score_spread":0.28182741330282995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000840301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86936677,0.000084599254,0.00089549494,0.039182745,0.00055666623,0.00053031096,0.000018604467,0.00010175446,0.089263044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830553,0.0000149022,0.0006903905,0.007835638,0.00046926265,0.000038327384,0.000007857602,0.000014366274,0.007873942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983133,0.00028014783,0.00023834157,0.0003395025,0.00040042156,0.00042826074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906003,0.00018375936,0.000029277155,0.00027741262,0.00011545172,0.0003340818],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007535401,0.00013667029,0.00019352489,0.00007268071,0.00058675645,0.00028747946,0.00033721834,0.00011314592,0.00032072287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005561128,0.00013769456,0.000063278916,0.00041962246,0.0001804567,0.00048059985,0.00007969109,0.00021949544,0.00095840223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074073505,0.00012345372,0.004145262,0.000016802607,0.000016279737,0.000022496093,0.015458302,0.0013717775,0.0032034689,0.9587799,0.014574739,0.002213477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011972657,0.00034913345,0.023087548,0.0004687735,0.000060348433,0.0000062568256,0.028364697,0.00042999996,0.0032034616,0.008886794,0.9328181,0.0011276079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10215102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28628573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94989306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021751822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015735811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7002076416","doi":"","title":"McNeil: A Welcome Clarification and Extension of Disclosure Principles: \"The Adversary System Has Lingered On","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Element (criminal law); Context (archaeology); Surprise; Comity; Duty; Mistake; Adversary","score_opus":0.051357759370072704,"score_gpt":0.29424984921878855,"score_spread":0.24289208984871585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7002076416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953947,0.0015237762,0.00010404013,0.019269591,0.00046559185,0.0006684423,0.000011506499,0.00016251848,0.023847513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982917,0.00009725596,0.0001960678,0.00038247372,0.0002874768,0.000008199755,0.0000037077855,0.000007516038,0.0007256114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847484,0.00024547317,0.00028641484,0.00029618162,0.00045618316,0.00024091375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990033,0.00017440881,0.00016607362,0.0003932836,0.000113300535,0.00014965681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010864023,0.00012076256,0.00019608767,0.000034005883,0.0008138775,0.00011964084,0.00027957017,0.00013200419,0.000022406624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002489803,0.00008953042,0.000072088,0.00018891302,0.00033814562,0.0002520358,0.00002984192,0.00022517162,0.000049791128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016978088,0.0001225817,0.0022117603,0.000111999485,0.000016562239,0.000013763019,0.005117239,0.00007753948,0.002516538,0.9851939,0.0014521405,0.0029962072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012057052,0.0008996766,0.22702198,0.002289527,0.00022302847,0.0000221379,0.024947684,0.00060300896,0.002316483,0.006609776,0.7330256,0.0008353531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002893121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015557292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008944297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091543414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62597704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008860536","doi":"","title":"Court Review 54:2 (2018)- Editor's Note","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Economic Justice; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.027460187689383395,"score_gpt":0.30547825605496265,"score_spread":0.27801806836557924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008860536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03932999,0.011129488,0.008342786,0.23924495,0.01962972,0.0019036732,0.00009544141,0.0005795728,0.67974436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88534844,0.022748206,0.009830238,0.003244247,0.01879945,9.703738e-7,0.000015360758,0.000030106963,0.059982985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988741,0.000109923945,0.00010023028,0.00021984143,0.0004462606,0.00024959905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907625,0.00012166951,0.00012728493,0.0002338439,0.00027729318,0.00016368381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060980394,0.00008229803,0.00021246148,0.000051829873,0.0006664127,0.000015003068,0.00052911584,0.000103482285,0.0017994792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016889122,0.00010077622,0.00011058224,0.0003325864,0.00081310736,0.00035804763,0.00011276693,0.00010350499,0.0007176177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032882534,0.00005581025,0.0003398766,0.00018349744,0.000013912433,0.000016104503,0.004158455,3.32891e-7,0.000069984846,0.007010543,0.97820604,0.009912543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120163226,0.00008699088,0.001412688,0.0004984398,0.000058541453,8.343218e-7,0.0022891993,0.000019691874,0.000011066832,0.00041516396,0.9949653,0.00012189569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008724176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133487815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84601843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012753016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002658456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011240406","doi":"","title":"Making Room for a Serial Killer Within Canada's Faint Hope Statute: Clifford Olson, Master Manipulator in the Criminal Justice System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Interrogation; Manipulator (device); Economic Justice; Control (management); Criticism; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.07261253742185192,"score_gpt":0.27289047925354776,"score_spread":0.20027794183169584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011240406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96466416,0.00005663849,0.00031106797,0.009624462,0.00086215726,0.0007714044,0.00008954283,0.000031481075,0.0235891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643636,0.0000068890276,0.00058614014,0.00013804661,0.0001025685,0.0000018153947,0.0000033055521,0.000009264809,0.0027156256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979672,0.0005761499,0.000200986,0.00025049134,0.0006026658,0.00040253618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889517,0.00024900498,0.00016207645,0.00045392508,0.00014981402,0.00008998648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015393266,0.00014186493,0.0002190852,0.000057996753,0.0018926214,0.00027813038,0.0013436977,0.00010669207,0.00012116363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011665988,0.00011668521,0.00012885821,0.0003709124,0.00022729796,0.00081753987,0.00011041144,0.00039417308,0.000009950227],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005772292,0.00045673983,0.027002674,0.0016392998,0.0002380315,0.0003387308,0.5454431,0.002539204,0.00029703215,0.33589506,0.06932603,0.011051767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007443705,0.00008780861,0.03071516,0.00039626058,0.000527798,0.000015890902,0.7923503,0.00053281966,0.000008409634,0.00032583595,0.17396285,0.00033252718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28241527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89416534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61175007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043590734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052483036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011865983","doi":"","title":"Nasogaluak: Foregone Opportunities in an Unduly Restrained Sentencing Decision","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Conscience; Charter; Misconduct; Power (physics); Guard (computer science); Nightmare","score_opus":0.07333201517934546,"score_gpt":0.34117207772953273,"score_spread":0.2678400625501873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011865983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678034,0.00006822208,0.00005998071,0.0029542674,0.0007475168,0.00020343426,0.000006314784,0.00010871097,0.02804812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506307,0.000052708994,0.0022307422,0.00060867233,0.0005198998,0.000016660193,0.00000792018,0.00001711699,0.0014831924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980537,0.00016150216,0.0003256228,0.0003463251,0.00058863044,0.00052416185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868816,0.00024412962,0.0000855291,0.00038176,0.00015040123,0.0004500236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001628394,0.00015275307,0.00020530794,0.00009085452,0.00063292956,0.00026767445,0.0004943492,0.00018131555,0.00081983773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072318077,0.00015096848,0.000069802794,0.0002358398,0.0004316688,0.00120525,0.00007350796,0.00047099788,0.0001145029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017652998,0.00019124683,0.019656802,0.000030068546,0.00000980663,0.00030047688,0.0086034415,0.000027901548,0.01127938,0.9193091,0.003185219,0.037230067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019148234,0.0004807815,0.05963006,0.00064913084,0.00006499303,0.00003945828,0.090246566,0.00037803708,0.0013136234,0.12504682,0.7187406,0.0014951329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03277509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5273432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79426223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088722794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033005644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014856829","doi":"","title":"Prosecutions, Politics and the Public Interest: Some Recent Developments in the United Kingdom, Canada and Elsewhere","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.26293921352028327,"score_gpt":0.41039938156051503,"score_spread":0.14746016804023176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014856829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89269274,0.00004728081,0.0000013565163,0.10585893,0.00020221308,0.00064861315,0.00008790818,0.00002233606,0.00043863617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950753,0.0010855063,0.00015743784,0.00033419704,0.00020586228,0.000004970333,0.00005964866,0.000010754472,0.0030663474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583346,0.001388358,0.00025654695,0.0004161754,0.0010879001,0.0010175406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975205,0.0010896188,0.00009208842,0.0003517286,0.0005534289,0.00039260963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003210472,0.00020255768,0.00023894121,0.00036327002,0.0018313378,0.0003487796,0.0010199107,0.00019653908,0.000056721317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010987398,0.00013898796,0.000033864384,0.0013192303,0.0022923383,0.00040477669,0.00039721027,0.001737478,0.0000053000367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025794626,0.00022869257,0.12327499,0.00007867367,0.000060622326,0.000335704,0.006359579,0.000002397315,0.00003538788,0.8490728,0.01893022,0.0013629805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014679865,0.000056907553,0.14540266,0.000081905535,0.000024114708,0.000032701828,0.019595426,0.000026777374,0.0000056992226,0.0016390325,0.8314245,0.00024233155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81055135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8474338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032690397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001828091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015156577","doi":"","title":"R. v. N.S.: What Is Fair in a Trial? The Supreme Court of Canada's Divided Opinion on the NIQAB in the Courtroom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Statutory interpretation; Public opinion; State supreme court; Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.037983347569102814,"score_gpt":0.2953825797984283,"score_spread":0.2573992322293255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015156577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6900231,0.00087286526,0.000001924746,0.29576907,0.0010515358,0.0016404819,0.000009184411,0.000015240507,0.01061656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137616,0.0005005317,0.0000053482167,0.0069225533,0.0002858036,0.00016668219,0.0000016687437,0.0000089304785,0.00073230476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969683,0.00092452596,0.00038407554,0.00024779735,0.001003278,0.00047201198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974872,0.0016368445,0.00014506628,0.00054186676,0.00009715034,0.000091875714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002979107,0.0001507425,0.00022529336,0.000031526353,0.00053634547,0.0003708968,0.0011417898,0.000089229696,0.00065859687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060625153,0.00007690998,0.00008608498,0.00040580207,0.00035593554,0.0005448326,0.000072892486,0.0004192482,0.000058246173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011982063,0.0003533518,0.0056915036,0.000043839173,0.000044971268,0.000017014227,0.04934019,0.000103148224,0.00015191798,0.38944697,0.5506391,0.002969806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039476426,0.00028401506,0.027131524,0.0006045218,0.000021288168,0.0000020577943,0.11410402,0.00010710926,0.00033562563,0.022360701,0.8306902,0.00041126122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89665675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9550262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36708626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019686627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006037567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7211174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015158212","doi":"","title":"R. v. Seruhungo: The Supreme Court of Canada 'Substantially' Affirms a Powerful Tool to Protect Against Wrongful Convictions Caused by Vetrovec Witnesses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Liability; Hearsay; Tort","score_opus":0.020558356179139304,"score_gpt":0.2806058922319038,"score_spread":0.2600475360527645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015158212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9294397,0.00025046873,0.000104724655,0.033468474,0.0010556901,0.0012391428,0.00018130413,0.000077815464,0.03418265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313915,0.000053199044,0.00007105174,0.0010751701,0.00028892115,0.00006243666,0.000006059982,0.000024292878,0.005279748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974307,0.00017365173,0.00038362152,0.00040631363,0.0009385184,0.00066722254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782515,0.00020652542,0.0002874395,0.0009794688,0.00033901146,0.00036242668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091543753,0.0002312593,0.0003342881,0.000026647142,0.0026902428,0.00044102714,0.0013276563,0.00011984115,0.00038028316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012306517,0.00018887903,0.0001031814,0.00019556237,0.00065863854,0.0005641182,0.00015301631,0.00030458628,0.000066370994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006218974,0.0005508736,0.025209926,0.0003460226,0.0005097152,0.00019502318,0.017450146,0.00057565584,0.06540217,0.2205951,0.6650929,0.003450589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043519962,0.00012131908,0.008194147,0.00017397769,0.00005938117,0.0000021148762,0.00338035,0.000017222323,0.0073034796,0.00035122916,0.9795094,0.00045218307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81580824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31441653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030602308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016947532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016238269","doi":"","title":"Workshop on Criminalization (September 2010)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Criminal code; Deportation; Common law","score_opus":0.07180738783820485,"score_gpt":0.3747301917893052,"score_spread":0.3029228039511004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016238269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14966832,0.000009507129,0.00042442212,0.0077563277,0.0012771543,0.0000890655,2.9633927e-7,0.00009767948,0.84067726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89098406,0.000020295554,0.00042098123,0.00072041166,0.0003690752,0.0000045975576,0.0000011717029,0.000004697872,0.107474685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993433,0.000035191882,0.00007777204,0.0001289133,0.0002430441,0.00017182752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995544,0.00013470501,0.00002300244,0.00013517318,0.00006127017,0.00009143873],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033719628,0.00005117988,0.000050984323,0.000026797055,0.00030117715,0.00007525355,0.00014225376,0.00007908229,0.007290028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002679994,0.000043460117,0.000031527234,0.000110932946,0.0001261653,0.0001714582,0.000013903164,0.00012334764,0.0013368676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015585541,0.00005467292,0.001141089,0.0000044716667,0.00000248008,0.0000035725916,0.0036010807,0.0000052986893,0.0008441447,0.6611211,0.3168922,0.01631432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048290047,0.000013526839,0.0030319334,0.000014237858,0.000009338373,8.7452713e-7,0.0021240872,0.000028672846,0.00044503712,0.002893394,0.9912787,0.00011189378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011936569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016866388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7413158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013575671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042828946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018240532","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Stopping ofMotor Vehicles in Canada andthe United States:A Comparative Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Power (physics); Proposition; Supreme Court Decisions; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.05660643949922553,"score_gpt":0.269740567376073,"score_spread":0.21313412787684746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018240532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967033,0.000111395384,0.00062629295,0.028008645,0.00004825658,0.00014552455,0.000059323123,0.000013515853,0.0039540194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992521,0.00009290649,0.00012094812,0.00028711182,0.000022590037,1.6249662e-7,0.0000153793,8.098367e-7,0.00020799019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991136,0.00017223686,0.00009475312,0.00013836642,0.00031683838,0.00016416392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991849,0.00041933346,0.00008898476,0.00006913542,0.000117940224,0.00011971896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021322643,0.000056525332,0.0001688138,0.00007076989,0.0006886971,0.000020066505,0.00031286693,0.000027490389,0.00010907055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056149554,0.000056601228,0.000056636116,0.0012415076,0.0007486563,0.00013949737,0.00005700117,0.0001050287,0.0000048814964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008570582,0.0001406965,0.380019,0.00006799587,0.0010493847,0.0002645804,0.19335721,0.062378585,0.00019720354,0.32941616,0.02814655,0.0041055726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000468069,0.000043046613,0.1123219,0.00003229431,0.00018712891,2.625089e-7,0.37990767,0.025536539,0.000012626549,0.00031329342,0.48097652,0.00020064245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92657906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026070452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013018835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5296971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018932218","doi":"","title":"The effective participation of suspects in police custody","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Criminal justice; Interrogation; Law enforcement; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03739101275247101,"score_gpt":0.38047022107882517,"score_spread":0.34307920832635413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018932218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8997587,0.00008602103,0.000016186841,0.0090610795,0.00012764234,0.00052585965,0.0000071978707,0.000052067986,0.09036527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926867,0.0004208565,0.0000057452376,0.000004612579,0.000080806974,0.0000029644186,0.0000020313046,0.000005303171,0.0067909835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976435,0.00076702423,0.00011324514,0.00022065673,0.00075722125,0.00049839984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797493,0.0014683121,0.000027884045,0.00015629556,0.00022826726,0.00014432486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00227722,0.000066485314,0.00010525524,0.00024300821,0.0006866073,0.000076326214,0.00034132207,0.00007276182,0.000104077655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040430357,0.000057972502,0.00006380196,0.0012640035,0.0007619202,0.0003881802,0.0001325994,0.00036403426,0.000059320373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019657053,0.00012799118,0.007910727,0.00011585285,0.000045925204,0.0004248233,0.031642847,0.00006924722,0.00026585726,0.9413711,0.009849539,0.007979555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000571417,0.0006064724,0.1523952,0.0006708965,0.000064354375,0.0000018673067,0.15381895,0.00037353305,0.0016152151,0.0061010984,0.6833625,0.00041849105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11320656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03087014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93526995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028805935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044570392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98681396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020550757","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v Chapman&lt;/i&gt;: Can You Believe Without Believing?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Work (physics); Order (exchange); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.028828856561482714,"score_gpt":0.2829789498087328,"score_spread":0.2541500932472501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020550757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47228786,0.0058012903,0.0002536909,0.120314,0.0021223903,0.001484197,0.0001277485,0.0012996948,0.39630914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981507,0.0003589805,0.0007163715,0.007502174,0.0020842964,0.0000306823,0.000015161609,0.000053807147,0.0077315453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962342,0.00028538823,0.0004960906,0.00081593625,0.0011392244,0.0010292114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976846,0.00016161182,0.00019925277,0.00051350123,0.00022587657,0.0012151676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088352035,0.00036264726,0.00049622677,0.000051180996,0.0013891361,0.00036829885,0.0010629722,0.00024768064,0.0015787869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008743182,0.00036838648,0.00022734165,0.0005757246,0.0006781546,0.00065537536,0.00025553556,0.00046044085,0.0018790679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014949037,0.00015175357,0.0075907465,0.000151871,0.00009174104,0.00014016454,0.02161615,0.000046566573,0.010840999,0.89773166,0.05786687,0.0036219873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038159732,0.00016561123,0.0018894703,0.0001228047,0.00007507034,0.0000044612148,0.0008722554,0.00004494909,0.00049433316,0.0017580047,0.99363816,0.00055327243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057345266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044388622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021520459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042871493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020775949","doi":"","title":"Ministerial Misfeasance: R. v. Morris and a Unique\\nEarly Privacy Breach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Statute; Information privacy; Nova scotia; Perspective (graphical); Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Data Protection Act 1998; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.03062384374743567,"score_gpt":0.31417314842757854,"score_spread":0.2835493046801429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020775949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828911,0.0010087012,0.000059849208,0.01440779,0.0004897151,0.0003766938,0.00001265736,0.00020108157,0.10055238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081117,0.00017341226,0.0012671658,0.0019038882,0.00080454437,0.000010781435,0.0000039462857,0.000011273349,0.00501383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827814,0.00018493805,0.00024261407,0.0003867696,0.0004274144,0.00048010584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901396,0.000095451825,0.00008040952,0.00031268012,0.00008695205,0.00041055324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005886548,0.00016888042,0.00023156956,0.000031316587,0.00070998806,0.0004108365,0.00038387757,0.0001519959,0.0004262455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002600562,0.00016892074,0.000073919364,0.00018663624,0.00038335088,0.0006176274,0.0000584379,0.00021551842,0.00015008557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005656522,0.00038551626,0.008505074,0.00008889906,0.000043888183,0.00021346292,0.023018066,0.0000028589493,0.009471619,0.845659,0.06642287,0.045623053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052113435,0.0002464544,0.014270221,0.00010297628,0.00003727165,0.000016418735,0.0010021249,0.0000071433537,0.000548305,0.012623268,0.97023886,0.00038581496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104274005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002864189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.903816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008061223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015819185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99616224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024689898","doi":"","title":"Sporenonderzoek op de plaats delict","year":2024,"lang":"nl","type":"book-chapter","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Gulag; Legal history","score_opus":0.23404696054428195,"score_gpt":0.4660813253211008,"score_spread":0.23203436477681885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024689898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00506299,0.00565811,0.000005193099,0.006274182,0.0010966777,0.00075198227,0.00019205415,0.00014534657,0.98081344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34690547,0.0063704234,0.00005442368,0.0000898009,0.0022506798,0.000034987675,0.000056307916,0.000100307676,0.6441376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117434,0.0002445008,0.0007570481,0.0013397665,0.0041758614,0.0023084802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621695,0.000973123,0.00015529699,0.00076618954,0.00065027445,0.0012381552],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006739818,0.0005685659,0.0006467041,0.0006497029,0.001446289,0.00082768337,0.0015688979,0.00095430366,0.031479966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006377838,0.000549475,0.00053019135,0.00044048988,0.0028229558,0.00037327362,0.0007552277,0.0032087788,0.022744095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008151492,0.00005121681,0.00010597826,0.00032290077,0.00013929552,0.0066460967,0.0036500127,0.0000031201637,0.00007671517,0.86147773,0.12355476,0.0038906483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114050985,0.00032484983,0.00011511265,0.0012099048,0.0001047673,0.00009227135,0.004702887,0.0000607462,0.00004833741,0.10022121,0.89241534,0.00059049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015542915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00848048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76886064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004004829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027526307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028040080","doi":"","title":"Discussion Following the Remarks of Mr. Power and Mr. Cole","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Immigration; Deportation; Phone; Power (physics); Residence","score_opus":0.013406147857826674,"score_gpt":0.2751604205440951,"score_spread":0.26175427268626844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028040080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351797,0.0011936814,0.00015092036,0.022805603,0.0011189722,0.00020714564,0.000021779315,0.000014384868,0.039307795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802554,0.00017445568,0.000110720415,0.00076649437,0.000039310467,0.000001133599,0.0000024638475,0.000007638703,0.0008722481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984458,0.0003762059,0.00023754776,0.00010198002,0.00052038074,0.00031809378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991054,0.0002691732,0.00013181544,0.00011196329,0.00013775367,0.00024391548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011640744,0.00009175515,0.00014022193,0.000039474133,0.0017168743,0.00012325114,0.00019933213,0.000044074543,0.00017968297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003420271,0.00005159708,0.000057981488,0.00028057533,0.0002702785,0.00018897212,0.000021527581,0.0002589738,4.975346e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002071476,0.00016370717,0.023466261,0.00009293067,0.00039883194,0.0010022923,0.06659727,0.0006072238,0.0016085273,0.6596206,0.24070401,0.005531225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021344871,0.000048457347,0.0004759059,0.00012460562,0.00004513697,0.000040199127,0.04920294,0.00003064458,0.00024003659,0.002974967,0.94646406,0.00013956771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47585765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8833074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70576006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014064595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052495394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029568555","doi":"","title":"Joseph Fabics v. City of New Brunswick","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.1533844669108018,"score_gpt":0.3748256413343371,"score_spread":0.2214411744235353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029568555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4158998,0.00013881692,0.00085880375,0.007839541,0.00026197825,0.000069662165,2.788397e-7,0.000048403068,0.5748827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658512,0.000020370464,0.0011156341,0.00018418627,0.00015968936,1.4419935e-7,1.9617677e-7,0.0000017976695,0.032666802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994119,0.000031211966,0.00008948018,0.000071962946,0.00026996972,0.00012547488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995558,0.00004261226,0.000029798073,0.000087575456,0.000088157045,0.0001960144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043039885,0.00003258515,0.000071652816,0.0000126639015,0.00005772947,0.00001745615,0.00015535651,0.00003807845,0.0004141811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032306134,0.00002793796,0.000028947024,0.00011676281,0.00011219768,0.00013915199,0.000026427255,0.000034838155,0.00008531825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019264993,0.000038399856,0.051776145,0.00000671518,0.0000048614297,0.0000020219654,0.023144737,0.0000036860267,0.00004560833,0.74470884,0.17080922,0.009440535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012405575,0.000049554666,0.007867609,0.000010177125,0.000009332055,4.264626e-7,0.0078526335,0.000006198737,0.00045050867,0.017717768,0.9658276,0.00008415734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18893282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095698945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7950184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028500248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095413317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9208022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029627650","doi":"","title":"La protection des secrets industriels appartenant à des tiers sous le régime fédéral de la Loi sur l'accès à l'information","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Corpus Université Laval (Université Laval)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Identification (biology); Unfair competition; Class (philosophy)","score_opus":0.018329759697837098,"score_gpt":0.22063400578070613,"score_spread":0.20230424608286904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029627650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2835321,0.0017929311,0.0071574934,0.0013556542,0.00072988414,0.0011588444,0.00009513739,0.00046204313,0.7037159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5656987,0.008142978,0.000967941,0.000120965015,0.0005116054,0.000005685359,0.00008113857,0.00016819221,0.42430282],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957726,0.0010064908,0.0003995668,0.00066093646,0.00085727335,0.00130316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972465,0.00043924758,0.0006650339,0.0004260772,0.00045975056,0.00076337624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014184485,0.0007207437,0.0006690153,0.00096041564,0.002333442,0.00029612277,0.0010930593,0.0018231281,0.00072095194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021638755,0.0008523758,0.000450269,0.0018145036,0.0028534355,0.002399963,0.00037036132,0.001291961,0.00027365104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012008407,0.00045863623,0.008130318,0.0007860552,0.00061854196,0.001791905,0.15552418,0.00058071734,0.004082749,0.13339694,0.010649446,0.68277967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015646424,0.00034277342,0.004213248,0.0009113806,0.0005781558,0.00023860284,0.03959537,0.0003367885,0.0026213664,0.0012048776,0.94731396,0.0010788135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13898669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036185786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9366645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003845266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023852421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029749839","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v Griffith&lt;/i&gt;","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Charter; Legislation; Hearsay; Subpoena; Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.025538441889498168,"score_gpt":0.2889928778528873,"score_spread":0.26345443596338913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029749839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2736966,0.006327621,0.00013153953,0.016877536,0.002305554,0.0003231744,0.000029855284,0.00041671618,0.6998914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94477993,0.0005699641,0.000991592,0.0021338155,0.0013885805,0.000028185976,0.000014366815,0.000028473572,0.05006509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720633,0.00032385418,0.00033528305,0.0005518532,0.0008386699,0.00074400456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825776,0.0002622165,0.00009776833,0.00054377597,0.0002893678,0.00054910174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008336282,0.00021254139,0.0003032812,0.000038119117,0.0011050771,0.00038007324,0.0005623054,0.00020813163,0.004788865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007857042,0.0002202758,0.00020195502,0.0005094209,0.00045350962,0.0006368054,0.00016339618,0.0002949831,0.0028660435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019781632,0.000098511606,0.00063919084,0.000030100302,0.000025766361,0.00019523971,0.0014224001,0.000009359228,0.01178247,0.92415357,0.059304204,0.0023193874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022129677,0.000032954915,0.0023676336,0.00008340896,0.00003934765,0.000010884501,0.0005545594,0.000005217045,0.0013744694,0.0073548565,0.98763967,0.0003157066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018576521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062723525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9283355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016969928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005160427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029899080","doi":"","title":"Legal outlier, again? U.S. felon suffrage: comparative and international human rights perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CentAUR (University of Reading)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Jurisprudence; Treaty; Proportionality (law); International human rights law; Suffrage; Criminal law; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.07062672387551965,"score_gpt":0.3062630479449132,"score_spread":0.23563632406939355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029899080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.785045,0.000057244364,0.000069732814,0.0003767741,0.000115323215,0.00007192495,0.0000049335677,0.000026106065,0.21423297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045795,0.000043227603,0.0003484723,0.000008129423,0.000043921787,6.831975e-8,0.0000036738663,0.0000020470259,0.009092502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937665,0.00006217621,0.000056004825,0.00018952433,0.00016752318,0.000148088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960274,0.000030449704,0.00007723351,0.00007482579,0.00011498617,0.00009978221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016705086,0.00006770111,0.00012787036,0.00007729914,0.00076922245,0.000024408415,0.00025497598,0.000047094385,0.0005780486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009402184,0.00007952401,0.000048793197,0.0000804724,0.0006883871,0.00051807327,0.000075279895,0.000086965476,0.000019572664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075217125,0.00013273912,0.007790877,0.000008343594,0.00005429238,0.000029661293,0.36059976,1.9742903e-7,0.00022213292,0.62710017,0.0035739446,0.00041268356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008188423,0.00018159005,0.099833935,0.000109987355,0.000097124575,0.0000052274886,0.67172027,0.000030546547,0.00036146757,0.007365407,0.2190944,0.00038119842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028296398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014755372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61973476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010572266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026552265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97817427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030515106","doi":"","title":"In a Nutshell: Correcting the Record About Medical Assistance in Dying","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Medical record; Government (linguistics); Legislation; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.028946420192286413,"score_gpt":0.3180327778697666,"score_spread":0.28908635767748014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030515106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90869737,0.0011672251,0.000038247777,0.022129267,0.0021117546,0.00032827785,0.0000028106094,0.00007118809,0.065453865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383277,0.000072147915,0.0000958076,0.0030163256,0.00030178,0.000108238746,9.091326e-7,0.000011288926,0.0025607215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971622,0.0007444681,0.00034397675,0.00031561588,0.00093882415,0.00049490394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987645,0.0007338903,0.000096632975,0.00022371626,0.000027495216,0.0001537264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004063404,0.00010277927,0.0001827949,0.00005001499,0.0011232152,0.00013186973,0.000731165,0.00006990264,0.0034030965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013206342,0.0000927396,0.00005759623,0.0006945745,0.00023608557,0.0003164556,0.0002067246,0.00095548603,0.00007870941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000386671,0.0004878808,0.38878584,0.00009398973,0.000023852459,0.0012745479,0.06297686,0.00047921785,0.00018417809,0.4397225,0.0332299,0.07235458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039760006,0.000043980017,0.0070281164,0.00019910316,0.000006815236,0.00001946935,0.025113396,0.000330187,0.00002203278,0.0053192494,0.96124935,0.00027070183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091557145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34702438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92801946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044285724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034851342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038269912","doi":"","title":"Graduate Students in the Canadian Historical Association","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.054293210490205676,"score_gpt":0.28396477739740045,"score_spread":0.22967156690719476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038269912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7626245,0.0011545675,0.00002404975,0.20236169,0.0007095596,0.0008304713,0.00020301112,0.000062478895,0.032029662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382424,0.0008583627,0.00003218247,0.00031264528,0.0001180994,4.523871e-7,0.00003355287,0.0000039853926,0.004816454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981044,0.00032627018,0.00019507199,0.00035562337,0.00074031134,0.00027834874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888694,0.00022654036,0.00020719961,0.00031845787,0.000093226394,0.00026764342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007697077,0.00010260138,0.00020110449,0.000055668705,0.0009034924,0.00010841104,0.0010412632,0.00009706662,0.000024016772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030916263,0.000100908626,0.000038596932,0.00019032268,0.00007563218,0.0005407393,0.00018968902,0.00018189548,0.000010205817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014703565,0.00017256067,0.40278712,0.00004795675,0.00013665769,0.0010253312,0.014012112,0.000007254025,0.000035161793,0.0012854215,0.57590264,0.004440726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053217926,0.000059742186,0.0692521,0.000031561696,0.00013574997,0.0000039602783,0.004008184,0.000026349644,0.0000033365136,0.00009973902,0.9256855,0.00016159221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9408922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9735601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34978285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039488086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002570276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039379751","doi":"","title":"La saisie de données situées dans le nuage en droit criminel canadien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Développement du Porc du Québec; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Legislation","score_opus":0.018902962460254844,"score_gpt":0.2663863277277084,"score_spread":0.24748336526745357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039379751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7662727,0.0034808686,0.000076948876,0.012877942,0.0013977601,0.00030385787,0.00005699755,0.00009887884,0.215434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034435,0.00052336615,0.00050192437,0.0014635855,0.0009512801,0.000021216374,0.000009364957,0.000045479806,0.09304024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626434,0.00082518655,0.00041545823,0.00066020095,0.0005923999,0.00124239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997513,0.00080168777,0.00015165396,0.0005899438,0.00010804284,0.0008356998],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017453432,0.00035473754,0.0004613659,0.000058789155,0.00081374287,0.0003480091,0.0010229632,0.0004538773,0.0022230486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003623195,0.0004020518,0.00024881004,0.00036570593,0.0010046251,0.0011021153,0.00018645989,0.0006721643,0.0030347442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031558036,0.00014566597,0.012142053,0.0002616764,0.00005807359,0.00026189463,0.022497654,0.000109233806,0.0019445221,0.95027256,0.0095799705,0.0026951153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005044718,0.00016942686,0.015363109,0.00053147785,0.00016106085,0.00006591043,0.030436827,0.000098396165,0.0011944885,0.018036459,0.9326902,0.00074815506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63939154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6339198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93223614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010017572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000981199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039504632","doi":"","title":"&lt;i&gt;R v Ibrahim&lt;/i&gt;","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Categorical variable; Depiction; State (computer science); Connection (principal bundle); Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.02572681383876039,"score_gpt":0.28933730455280277,"score_spread":0.26361049071404236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039504632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.207342,0.006209718,0.0001383551,0.01596677,0.002132629,0.00030371462,0.000028093684,0.00040132998,0.7674774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397419,0.0005502517,0.0010754669,0.002326785,0.0013773509,0.000027256316,0.000014981338,0.000029491037,0.05485653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725926,0.0003272178,0.00033099414,0.00054677,0.00079976104,0.00073597755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982912,0.000272511,0.000095247415,0.00054716424,0.0002489467,0.0005449167],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007939701,0.00020877886,0.00029896758,0.000038136397,0.0010838086,0.00040656948,0.0005682948,0.00020451822,0.005651126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075717596,0.00021972282,0.0002037184,0.00050513697,0.00045803722,0.00074357574,0.0001750725,0.00027958766,0.0031400968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017512197,0.00008567579,0.00053530297,0.000029357547,0.000023118966,0.00016855863,0.0013363631,0.000007920689,0.012279691,0.92548054,0.058059126,0.0019768192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020701044,0.00003145582,0.001406184,0.0000802989,0.000035806166,0.000009550289,0.00055174733,0.0000060671046,0.0020491397,0.007916918,0.98739827,0.00030753546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015893241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040526263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001561776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053286983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7040986749","doi":"","title":"USA v. Mosley","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Legislation; Culpability; Law enforcement; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.031708603439576856,"score_gpt":0.33268072267955096,"score_spread":0.3009721192399741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7040986749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14704964,0.00003041519,0.00016213956,0.0039244154,0.000087341235,0.000024110497,1.6359596e-7,0.000034327666,0.84868747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91597444,0.0000052781843,0.00031262325,0.00016625479,0.00020311284,0.0000010869778,2.142775e-7,0.0000010502656,0.08333596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996451,0.000016797292,0.000041612173,0.00005619515,0.00012552273,0.00011474656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998715,0.000031684896,0.0000076076008,0.00004376312,0.000018493502,0.000026973188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014164047,0.000020338308,0.000026530592,0.0000075549624,0.00020534829,0.00003285999,0.000075246906,0.000018743922,0.0020547812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022490916,0.000017335604,0.0000168061,0.00006291589,0.00008029065,0.00009444441,0.000007852854,0.00001790338,0.00065231015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.909244e-7,0.000010520393,0.008915054,8.3743663e-7,3.674086e-7,0.0000021849323,0.0002722938,0.0000025945583,0.00020625364,0.91594595,0.07274303,0.0018999394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020278841,0.000004570145,0.01032354,0.0000020418665,0.000001994181,2.2700156e-7,0.0006321268,0.0000039793513,0.00026850207,0.0111831445,0.97751474,0.000044841207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0977356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06290625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90477175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014905302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025314235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042949477","doi":"","title":"3rd Qtr Crime Report from ep. 314 of City Hall This Week","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Commission; Police department; Crime analysis; Royal Commission","score_opus":0.016502528809721077,"score_gpt":0.23610836077341946,"score_spread":0.21960583196369837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042949477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010055972,0.00038919103,0.0000017499891,0.00052497105,0.0005549932,0.00033859446,0.00012151168,0.00014404701,0.9978244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005668845,0.00034995875,0.0009811339,0.00020232906,0.00045130218,0.000007762997,0.0001238107,0.00006339359,0.99215144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739134,0.0001749726,0.0009184004,0.00026786324,0.0008997647,0.0003476316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974172,0.00032203476,0.0012790688,0.00051440904,0.00029030102,0.00017696034],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008025648,0.00029260427,0.00060378097,0.00006625913,0.00014092907,0.000058179998,0.00058370596,0.0005488564,0.59695935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077205664,0.00029548275,0.00024534544,0.000011498654,0.0004859668,5.305093e-7,0.00010432313,0.0002682432,0.008924835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004883569,0.000045685403,0.000015736423,0.00022341787,0.000046834954,0.0000353175,0.0008971652,0.000007832775,4.5498618e-7,0.00020280061,0.9975952,0.00088072976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017816448,0.00007951652,0.000037308553,0.00040215388,0.00009836663,0.00001924773,0.00032750482,0.000002530746,0.000012329461,0.000082715735,0.99845743,0.00030270693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27565992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030924324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5880345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066094704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012328314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043997636","doi":"","title":"Wrongfully Convicted Guilty Pleas, Imagined Crimes, and What Canada Must Do to Safeguard Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguard; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.031901552444164746,"score_gpt":0.32908927157367646,"score_spread":0.2971877191295117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043997636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59548414,0.0013939788,0.00013553503,0.251764,0.003783046,0.000953513,0.000043801323,0.00066807837,0.14577389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779781,0.0005768322,0.00029908493,0.0032786585,0.00028568323,0.000013609129,0.000009771507,0.000012878362,0.017545378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984958,0.00008411598,0.00017212777,0.00030457918,0.0004725988,0.00047073557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891233,0.00028967214,0.000030192386,0.00020707128,0.0001631565,0.00039759604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043690807,0.00011875691,0.00015513483,0.000051355662,0.0005269295,0.00047550345,0.0002929505,0.000050367602,0.0008278046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000649976,0.00011090088,0.000023294917,0.00050064013,0.00013891273,0.000599478,0.00012667013,0.000087924745,0.00015390286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051001967,0.000014512345,0.0009813485,0.00007096418,0.00001832095,0.000110428606,0.0077116727,0.00002770681,0.0002925006,0.035864897,0.93003917,0.024817461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013826537,0.000025770496,0.011540161,0.00005029784,0.000058323938,0.000002368005,0.07005521,0.000051235114,0.00008535644,0.0003153975,0.91744506,0.00023252628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89712834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9504474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38249394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015673702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008299296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90638804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046054625","doi":"","title":"Civil liability and the police use of force in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Harvard University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Demotion; Triacetin; Hemopericardium","score_opus":0.008630488093284877,"score_gpt":0.20810972083909568,"score_spread":0.1994792327458108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046054625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8546884,0.003464567,0.0000038507446,0.0028339536,0.00022782364,0.00078722957,0.0000118392945,0.000054568394,0.13792777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927648,0.0018096677,0.00005356883,0.0009935086,0.00023807568,0.000013865019,0.0000041102853,0.000014017649,0.0041084094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997704,0.00033585398,0.00036405525,0.0002720173,0.00032859622,0.0009954636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795383,0.0015561938,0.00010499778,0.00021476466,0.000028891322,0.00014131273],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192436,0.00007930485,0.00025309584,0.00001254004,0.0003727183,0.0003166908,0.00034642933,0.00006604346,0.004034505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012777836,0.00011166582,0.00005329237,0.00058753893,0.00053545943,0.0008709363,0.0001200831,0.0003017578,4.872546e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024022882,0.00006894835,0.45356965,0.000048964677,0.000034056506,0.00003620841,0.0017538837,0.00012378223,5.574135e-7,0.43290114,0.07905182,0.03217077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013276507,0.00012515351,0.0949803,0.00028664456,0.000041147217,0.00003154157,0.0016305317,0.00037669775,0.0000073175543,0.60343534,0.29729542,0.0004622523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35858935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025283912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024078113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067837433","doi":"","title":"Non-Disclosure of Relevant Material and Chapter III: The Tantalising Promise of Due Process Rights Protection by the Australian Constitution in the Gageler High Court Using Separation of Powers Principles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"High Court; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Process (computing); Separation of powers; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07245225550536545,"score_gpt":0.3427873845343191,"score_spread":0.2703351290289537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067837433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859101,0.000021394566,0.000029656627,0.001216159,0.00005511913,0.0007411308,0.00006015805,0.000008021861,0.01195825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998605,0.000045689514,0.000015806,0.000001554605,0.000020972395,2.6541116e-7,0.0000058746314,0.000002525643,0.0013023043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867547,0.00023473526,0.00014328415,0.0001946989,0.0005493503,0.0002024467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939185,0.00010035893,0.000115061695,0.00013320635,0.00021605122,0.000043464366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276743,0.0000823917,0.00013298418,0.00020643581,0.0007511561,0.000051724506,0.00031819075,0.00008938912,0.0000341382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002967853,0.000054968976,0.000047282163,0.000698985,0.0016951633,0.00055712083,0.0000749995,0.00023996105,3.5426004e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013686159,0.00017758727,0.0017317828,0.00043000933,0.000108595115,0.00041432877,0.04388201,0.00014537212,0.045177985,0.9052335,0.0011635359,0.00016669219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029733393,0.0012339149,0.012804186,0.003067687,0.00079281774,0.00011118226,0.67575717,0.0017849859,0.08823547,0.0059452923,0.20636512,0.00092884636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021973122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006842929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8992882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009160042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032724696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070652118","doi":"","title":"The principle of the free evaluation of evidence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific periodicals of Ukraine","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Conviction; Element (criminal law); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Enforcement","score_opus":0.2030428212577023,"score_gpt":0.46066831068426145,"score_spread":0.25762548942655916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070652118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97176814,0.0031678493,0.00003017765,0.016231129,0.0010915308,0.0004520282,0.000015109831,0.000008739711,0.00723528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613166,0.00008985689,0.00007075224,0.000025518046,0.000022921655,0.000011890664,4.1570783e-7,0.000001684864,0.0036453106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996939,0.0004963773,0.00041573305,0.00019744122,0.0017608245,0.00019063306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717444,0.00070509687,0.0002611738,0.0007895343,0.0010295976,0.000040153154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013271942,0.000058430353,0.00014869845,0.00005255801,0.0010064425,0.00008260515,0.0013706478,0.000047083326,0.00016601986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018320048,0.000030467609,0.0001241643,0.00092698296,0.0045868736,0.00013785022,0.0002757729,0.00007478085,0.000002711826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018900186,0.00043382656,0.014191525,0.00051871396,0.00010041608,5.0617206e-7,0.03957743,0.00028484725,0.15713485,0.65024424,0.03650122,0.100823455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006322304,0.00009072649,0.077136405,0.0020901628,0.00032354178,5.1260093e-7,0.005777188,0.0013980335,0.062244438,0.03878262,0.81131625,0.00020789223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063146756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022561515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.774815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051066625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013715242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094497017","doi":"","title":"The Filing of Additional Reasonsin Canada","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Supreme court; Conviction; Paragraph; Criminal code; Sentence","score_opus":0.024038247147693297,"score_gpt":0.20524812343802895,"score_spread":0.18120987629033566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094497017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40589812,0.0038520074,0.0004938309,0.47584456,0.002020383,0.0012601446,0.00989356,0.00007711221,0.10066029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960739,0.00044270078,0.0005043241,0.00026673928,0.00022507003,1.2607765e-7,0.000030570372,0.0000055939786,0.0024509933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982258,0.00019330713,0.00020344403,0.00026948447,0.0008141976,0.00029375107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975931,0.0013619983,0.00035774425,0.00017163408,0.00023515115,0.00028037216],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028654363,0.000119772514,0.00026825507,0.000022961129,0.0013432004,0.000021850567,0.0007907305,0.0001022356,0.005578938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048458032,0.00013419728,0.00016366306,0.00057383656,0.0009909717,0.00023577026,0.00021230003,0.00021026094,0.000017442771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005285567,0.00010089115,0.0009411877,0.00021419804,0.00017707642,0.0001123131,0.018797161,0.0002700529,0.0001746665,0.03915896,0.91305137,0.02647357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024692397,0.00012583841,0.007546169,0.00018025245,0.00010007808,0.00000117054,0.07440625,0.0013428661,0.00003829851,0.00040592268,0.9154233,0.00018297834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6768044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9006348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59017575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014366466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029655553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097452286","doi":"","title":"Firearms – Mandatory Minimum Sentences – Consecutive Sentences – Notice of Greater Penalty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Criminal code; Public policy; Paragraph; Legislation; Criminal law","score_opus":0.0639084087610424,"score_gpt":0.3455534127800999,"score_spread":0.28164500401905745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097452286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87075126,0.00032020282,0.000048533206,0.003075774,0.00065432786,0.00015815136,0.000009210599,0.000045874556,0.12493666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929116,0.000097710945,0.0002889589,0.00032355235,0.00023553497,0.0000057835196,0.0000014739855,0.000004775217,0.006130644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847114,0.00018101823,0.00022721323,0.00017857284,0.00048629695,0.00045576892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990529,0.00032617454,0.0001140688,0.00013821115,0.00015929189,0.00020936366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090660143,0.00011311952,0.00019277482,0.00004572084,0.0002918159,0.000036760535,0.0002616367,0.0000751603,0.0017437846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020223843,0.00008467118,0.00008732456,0.00016356692,0.00090598734,0.00058309414,0.000059552633,0.00008019358,0.0001917512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015502368,0.00028444012,0.82321376,0.0001106918,0.000088668006,0.000018981389,0.09175256,0.0000014039721,0.0010226906,0.052410174,0.028655224,0.0022863778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007021855,0.0003206323,0.23073743,0.0003426064,0.00031702942,0.00003514857,0.49867705,0.000064511325,0.012048206,0.0017578142,0.25390136,0.0010960218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010150209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018692818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5924763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030586078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010815057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097708844","doi":"","title":"SUBJECT: Appeals by Crown to the Court of Appeal and Supreme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Acquittal; Supreme court; Law of the case; Argument (complex analysis); Jury; Remand (court procedure); Trial court","score_opus":0.060835135841402356,"score_gpt":0.338374096094975,"score_spread":0.2775389602535726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097708844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6827159,0.0007240711,0.00052444404,0.07681124,0.00023813914,0.0003654936,0.00001067313,0.00004980297,0.23856023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930193,0.000028384231,0.00010265843,0.00051862444,0.00007998683,0.0000032542882,4.517565e-7,0.0000024429382,0.0062449058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993001,0.00006676045,0.000093135684,0.000098781704,0.00028234653,0.0001588782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995656,0.00008268933,0.00002293584,0.00009924627,0.00007732114,0.00015221618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010140976,0.00004237194,0.000078973135,0.000011167393,0.00013654162,0.000041715724,0.00018581834,0.000028605633,0.00008097859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019674191,0.000027196165,0.000016190957,0.00010481445,0.00017917223,0.00008920768,0.00004844362,0.000034041448,0.000049027978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004968028,0.000031931115,0.007453469,0.000010386609,0.000007107527,0.0000010550426,0.027800959,0.0000034909613,0.0007138436,0.053947605,0.90533984,0.0046406607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000953433,0.00008205348,0.0015421951,0.0000126906125,0.000009987159,9.934831e-7,0.01712925,0.000009986851,0.0007974338,0.0011560238,0.979081,0.000083067454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017278133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01047281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3103034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016254504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007203374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097885465","doi":"","title":"and","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminal offence; Work (physics); Restitution; Legislation; Criminal investigation","score_opus":0.09603738423026005,"score_gpt":0.34592789001591695,"score_spread":0.2498905057856569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097885465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45969117,0.00006400767,0.000030875883,0.0042098504,0.000024344157,0.000011388128,2.8105754e-8,0.00001864037,0.5359497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98287946,0.00017478365,0.00019838582,0.00016543713,0.00003430599,2.664027e-7,1.4837248e-8,3.4619248e-7,0.016547002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998684,0.000006686451,0.000013146884,0.000025857606,0.000044678673,0.000041265354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999322,0.000018603772,0.0000020430095,0.000014872243,0.0000060881407,0.000026140227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005063188,0.000007871125,0.000012640611,0.0000031140612,0.00019213451,0.0000045212423,0.000018274943,0.0000070754377,0.00023397907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024847684,0.0000064628066,0.0000034611744,0.000018485964,0.000104625215,0.00004904098,0.0000045607107,0.000007948982,0.000038581937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027286048,0.0000093297895,0.040093556,0.0000019490453,0.0000011360589,0.000016093256,0.019699363,8.383062e-8,0.000080050595,0.8773219,0.052159317,0.010614513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019051042,0.0000062919476,0.020286396,0.0000012053396,8.26e-7,0.0000035512214,0.0015825996,0.0000015749146,0.000042864413,0.0017495272,0.9762782,0.000027906577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026548768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009664236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000237351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012025013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40133974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098349229","doi":"","title":"Estimation of a High-Accuracy Marine Geoid Offshore Newfoundland","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geoid; Altimeter; Undulation of the geoid; Bathymetry; Geodetic datum; Ocean surface topography; Submarine pipeline; Gravitational field; Sea-surface height","score_opus":0.05607599913959358,"score_gpt":0.3460735052191679,"score_spread":0.2899975060795743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098349229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8116522,0.000035049263,0.0016539174,0.0051832558,0.00022618021,0.00012269664,0.0000012650394,0.000052012783,0.18107346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929292,0.00001738142,0.0026467855,0.000062287596,0.00008993729,0.000002469365,0.000004360545,0.0000024826352,0.0042450596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999381,0.000038386443,0.00011606444,0.0000824341,0.0002647042,0.000117387346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999556,0.000101825295,0.00005032456,0.000094549425,0.00009753673,0.00009973827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039507,0.0000415016,0.00008659698,0.00002241056,0.000074880816,0.00003140271,0.00011625895,0.00003302272,0.0004581243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061699864,0.000034769186,0.000020061494,0.00011854115,0.000108676824,0.0002719763,0.000040448343,0.000030889587,0.00006681679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011405571,0.000110063826,0.03602612,0.000040986713,0.000014666242,0.0000073312813,0.0124244485,0.00063135475,0.00005275156,0.6996992,0.022629598,0.22824942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017419853,0.00061510754,0.14018905,0.00012741194,0.00013827253,0.000012259004,0.017703427,0.0076302225,0.0009293042,0.2514727,0.57864827,0.000791978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10507253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038437277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55601865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001423577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97910875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100378162","doi":"","title":"ARTICLE Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Guidelines for Treating Mild Diabetic Foot Infections: A Decision-Tree Model for Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formulary; Christian ministry; Foot (prosody); Health care; Amputation; Medical prescription; Diabetes mellitus; Health economics; Diabetic foot","score_opus":0.11319300397528886,"score_gpt":0.4126541490281165,"score_spread":0.2994611450528276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100378162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163788,0.00008453922,0.1757342,0.006510255,0.00011222233,0.000339289,0.00008952058,0.000022395478,0.00072881934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901478,0.000040977717,0.007855011,0.00029846164,0.00007447695,0.000096506126,0.0000015353264,0.0000055894307,0.0014796162],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991036,0.000017645942,0.0003539179,0.00017392269,0.00012344176,0.00022746513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762917,0.0017117995,0.0000943142,0.00011341979,0.00036030874,0.00009096716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005003543,0.00006845089,0.00020028133,0.00008240632,0.00025968946,0.000020279074,0.00013207844,0.000027401717,0.00012541031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001358911,0.000047986367,0.00014574865,0.00020889142,0.000055732777,0.00015961168,0.000015832642,0.000011482599,0.0000011945244],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003844725,0.00030212777,0.06951561,0.00009641554,0.0017348945,5.958599e-7,0.0032976612,0.07950277,0.014233696,0.052608434,0.21287753,0.5654458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009951469,0.0000761721,0.0010701605,0.000063732456,0.0014317604,9.998721e-8,0.001418012,0.9645881,0.004537189,0.009108135,0.016432485,0.00027900637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42478007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97106093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88508534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015177653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042152213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57905036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100403598","doi":"","title":"Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Warrant; Treaty; Crown (dentistry); Convention","score_opus":0.04078256199493512,"score_gpt":0.3187948458126955,"score_spread":0.2780122838177604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100403598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20562184,0.0001607559,0.0007949947,0.002238409,0.0001403015,0.00004127115,5.278546e-7,0.000035232406,0.7909667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548037,0.00004839644,0.00062923715,0.00015179448,0.000049136608,0.0000016672037,1.8315632e-7,0.0000013159324,0.013637878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999616,0.00004798622,0.000042670654,0.00007982841,0.00011222476,0.000101287704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998366,0.000048350466,0.000010033015,0.000035461566,0.0000156087,0.000053896274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024097945,0.000026117128,0.00003260415,0.000008068758,0.00022560211,0.000057607904,0.000030710176,0.000021343045,0.00048020706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103816565,0.000023857121,0.0000102881095,0.000049588387,0.00012068961,0.00023343414,0.0000022555953,0.00002804228,0.000030427538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017165803,0.0000060507296,0.00074808794,0.0000014930541,6.065618e-7,0.0000024949493,0.00062934833,7.67644e-8,0.00007540651,0.99203074,0.0051533636,0.0013506094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004636726,0.000014273426,0.0039449222,0.0000055392343,0.0000037306327,0.000002817227,0.0029591757,0.0000033940953,0.00018124511,0.0063027088,0.9864742,0.000061616396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069769926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029663425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017026836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036430472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5257931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100982594","doi":"","title":"JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION / June 2002 Thompson / CHINESE PERSPECTIVES CHINESE PERSPECTIVES ON THE IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF AN MBA TEACHER","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marketization; China; Supply and demand; Work (physics); Business education; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.015315504040166383,"score_gpt":0.33354718164428765,"score_spread":0.31823167760412124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100982594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.797543,0.0010136552,0.000047190137,0.017909728,0.00033921676,0.0002147651,0.000001486346,0.000018036837,0.18291295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837375,0.0010105035,0.00027225798,0.00004920246,0.00059175666,0.0000064435176,1.4556943e-7,0.000009853313,0.014322333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983107,0.0002913265,0.0003413141,0.0002276344,0.0006160431,0.00021297313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987048,0.00020362332,0.00035446865,0.00028348903,0.00034047986,0.00011314525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015690695,0.00014750789,0.00022163802,0.00012336395,0.0002539053,0.00005609582,0.00045359533,0.00004701467,0.0024646956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006575698,0.00006507018,0.00014355779,0.00030858448,0.0003647284,0.0004960345,0.000037144804,0.00011633471,0.000016375958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020463915,0.0017022674,0.011223797,0.00002249883,0.00011514775,0.000010754888,0.15392466,0.0000026539851,0.0015688493,0.8163551,0.0044197044,0.010449904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043480264,0.0004316261,0.21402675,0.00023111231,0.000077026365,0.000013998856,0.73989326,0.000008982718,0.00024737083,0.03896827,0.0053848024,0.0002820052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005815212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012980303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77738684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018395894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002005728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101083735","doi":"","title":"51 Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture Pip’s Cognitive Development in Great Expectations From the Viewpoint of Space Product","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Product (mathematics); New product development; Cognition","score_opus":0.06563416272331053,"score_gpt":0.34252031383845943,"score_spread":0.2768861511151489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101083735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97550136,0.0008008319,0.0000065838476,0.007400189,0.00007115234,0.0003319498,0.00002680379,0.000006145867,0.01585496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873585,0.000036683305,0.00035111362,0.00016425004,0.000047130743,0.000010674926,0.000007725319,0.0000025750783,0.0006439724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991809,0.00008827253,0.00016665376,0.00015291243,0.00025717355,0.00015410202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999573,0.000088775894,0.000058623573,0.00003597889,0.000087425215,0.00015621868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002757611,0.00006738558,0.000115641466,0.00003345174,0.00014970609,0.000017491353,0.00011978601,0.000043840428,0.0001349277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002313586,0.00004478584,0.000016543509,0.00018835324,0.00029542224,0.00017239839,0.000029905304,0.00008487309,0.000010147145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006924048,0.000067940004,0.15949291,0.000013842915,0.000037749254,0.000007526631,0.7931355,9.845536e-7,0.00028122737,0.028386086,0.015818315,0.0026886654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598154,0.00006256152,0.18583922,0.00030819298,0.00005440998,0.0000045331885,0.70696115,0.0000060778225,0.02279972,0.0021816662,0.080835864,0.00028680774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4222165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8327193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41050285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013483774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046028406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.581631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103316784","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Stopping of\\nMotor Vehicles in Canada and\\nthe United States:\\nA Comparative Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Insecta mundi","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Power (physics); Proposition; Supreme Court Decisions; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.0740734188477374,"score_gpt":0.30944910478508225,"score_spread":0.23537568593734487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103316784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896427,0.0013134206,0.00009227247,0.0073733814,0.00018943577,0.0002459401,0.00013911621,0.000008193525,0.0009955865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841744,0.0007938899,0.00002250514,0.0006408927,0.00006976734,0.000007499356,0.00001838949,0.0000030722822,0.000026528276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749476,0.00059028366,0.00056152494,0.00032815002,0.00061607,0.00040919826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972466,0.0018850007,0.0002689977,0.0001559947,0.00020662251,0.0002367555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057763816,0.00018674253,0.00045457587,0.00011423574,0.0009031973,0.00012518006,0.00044557676,0.00006080578,0.0001257893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033631915,0.00015211735,0.00009584684,0.0024608043,0.002357494,0.0001957259,0.00012468024,0.00030700388,0.0000038316416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004577627,0.00007426024,0.7622122,0.00010597071,0.0009684184,0.00006453023,0.12437689,0.009972868,0.00036113497,0.09923012,0.0009515006,0.0012243399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012597422,0.00038363907,0.60132784,0.000421804,0.0014255283,0.000004627817,0.10824927,0.16345957,0.0001450518,0.0010723047,0.12109498,0.0011556278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99645627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16088435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041891684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028623699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8686285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104259451","doi":"10.71781/2587","title":"La reconnaissance du droit constitutionnel aux services d'un expert en droit criminel canadien","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Expert system; Data Protection Act 1998","score_opus":0.009406467149788472,"score_gpt":0.21623771033575512,"score_spread":0.20683124318596666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104259451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7525089,0.019229338,0.0000727213,0.0011413512,0.0024700505,0.00072685856,0.0001246078,0.00021282701,0.22351338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94351447,0.009519914,0.00022325307,0.00038356893,0.0009016461,0.0000766674,0.0003730808,0.00005709862,0.044950295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937391,0.00071325724,0.0010257681,0.0016459884,0.0015770565,0.0012988099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592966,0.000579894,0.0008087283,0.0007455647,0.0007308631,0.0012053144],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008605197,0.0010026474,0.0009811,0.0004794468,0.024960639,0.0003556113,0.0018062103,0.0013704019,0.0009736878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017074935,0.001295885,0.0006959255,0.00076379336,0.0021085448,0.001671199,0.00022263698,0.0010265177,0.0002875043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038149548,0.0007953558,0.006603019,0.00083706004,0.0009854118,0.0126064485,0.7080867,0.0016617405,0.0025850895,0.22898473,0.002216266,0.030823164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001800939,0.00022798813,0.02423148,0.0022968668,0.0011049829,0.0024910967,0.5070035,0.0011170409,0.0019783047,0.0029873962,0.45231697,0.0024434517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6550395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4095926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45010072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011906492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007853092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104292295","doi":"10.71781/2457","title":"Extradition, extraterritorialité et application de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.012288852521777948,"score_gpt":0.2345604343380687,"score_spread":0.22227158181629075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104292295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.930322,0.004813453,0.0006393806,0.0025128564,0.0033961248,0.00052050414,0.00015033221,0.00026410198,0.057381265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9182899,0.0020390498,0.0003259957,0.00016723217,0.0008060556,0.000103881706,0.00071779505,0.00004994357,0.07750012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656063,0.0008557424,0.00044273803,0.00072213385,0.00066137,0.0007573775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977145,0.00056785176,0.00038959394,0.00032157914,0.00035639323,0.00065004115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013052276,0.00043502203,0.0003771289,0.00022762358,0.009137805,0.00020092899,0.0005603539,0.0006876542,0.000057818317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019541639,0.00055617525,0.00028393025,0.0006405245,0.0009634176,0.0008831231,0.00007427825,0.0005595967,0.00014606124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027581374,0.00018691985,0.0039228885,0.0002485025,0.00016435068,0.0009441546,0.26838076,0.0009497026,0.012351337,0.7042927,0.0018390564,0.006443803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009304659,0.00018294781,0.16927698,0.0012136202,0.00075059134,0.00063215225,0.1229692,0.0011150589,0.0024218617,0.04041685,0.6586999,0.0013903545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7648154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67843527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6638759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008768738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036659208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104435345","doi":"10.71781/23675","title":"Les relations de coopération entre la police et le secteur de l'investigation privée au Québec : la perspective de l'enquêteur de police","year":2000,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Criminal justice; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.009254813869465325,"score_gpt":0.23826897330507923,"score_spread":0.2290141594356139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104435345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84425634,0.0018225884,0.00082798494,0.0029161535,0.00018738715,0.00053574616,0.000056086985,0.0001750361,0.14922267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96224606,0.0008505433,0.0009490811,0.0002373718,0.0004159664,0.00006223267,0.0001942389,0.000050614508,0.034993876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946227,0.0020581419,0.00056718086,0.00086929393,0.00089043484,0.0009922631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965158,0.0010004485,0.00067488616,0.0003625021,0.00061761256,0.0008287401],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011909535,0.00059834984,0.00045581232,0.00042969536,0.015077729,0.00031575194,0.00067740586,0.0010922113,0.000097975724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003967969,0.0007924678,0.0004363238,0.00081531407,0.0010752382,0.0012559,0.00010091068,0.0010458177,0.000051432904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007633169,0.00029348914,0.05256349,0.00010453528,0.00022481856,0.00022138792,0.69889677,0.009366186,0.00937264,0.22670911,0.0004077469,0.001076501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010410871,0.00013598357,0.41822544,0.00067077635,0.00097014254,0.0008265374,0.5185511,0.0027322082,0.0028426216,0.0018934131,0.051056944,0.0010537506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98310983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9285273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36566195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030835839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05235969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106822531","doi":"10.14288/cjur.v6i1.192518","title":"\"Playing Breathalyzer Roulette\"","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Charter; Supreme court; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Test (biology)","score_opus":0.09762835565376125,"score_gpt":0.3579168316254176,"score_spread":0.26028847597165633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106822531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073944184,0.000022251214,0.0003765495,0.04113676,0.00015882142,0.00024375565,0.0000062333675,0.00004845978,0.9572677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6628423,0.000044164746,0.0012103458,0.0036621457,0.0005415249,0.0000634112,0.0000022057816,0.000010282519,0.3316236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999378,0.00007458677,0.00008373698,0.00015703244,0.00014334709,0.00016324355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963105,0.000081077684,0.000023934994,0.00007316137,0.000048042108,0.00014270723],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017600216,0.000046548277,0.00008056283,0.000010145575,0.005965057,0.0012812933,0.00033488622,0.000034706118,0.0031123534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002162884,0.00004848889,0.000036273985,0.00079911255,0.00006601243,0.00033744,0.000095738294,0.00008496301,0.00013191106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011816699,0.000017165718,0.00020559393,0.000002046084,0.000007529692,0.000006627904,0.0040037455,0.000011200598,0.00008339732,0.0029625043,0.9921346,0.00055377604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009628223,0.000026293184,0.00011601546,0.000007688068,0.000015487312,0.0000020143564,0.002501217,0.000073893774,0.00004176149,0.0005573846,0.9964756,0.00008638777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07466565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014763976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6621029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055787925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017634923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112360526","doi":"","title":"Arbitrary Detention Powers and Section 1 of the Charter: Two Critical Blind Spots in Luamba","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Charter; Section (typography); Power (physics); Legislation; High Court; Ex parte","score_opus":0.021085079488006718,"score_gpt":0.32170926150950147,"score_spread":0.30062418202149477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112360526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513303,0.002143373,0.000049068898,0.01018161,0.0031334003,0.000495362,0.00001216211,0.0000234055,0.032631326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970688,0.0003866719,0.000074370495,0.0008523648,0.00030889042,0.000017121813,0.0000012976908,0.000009727875,0.0012807526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972929,0.000568265,0.00059221545,0.0005179001,0.0005283095,0.0005004254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988106,0.00038549924,0.0001276785,0.00034707176,0.00014426671,0.00018492348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013240813,0.00021767546,0.00033648123,0.000117118485,0.0007057519,0.00021006587,0.00038051716,0.00024279118,0.0003678784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006135359,0.00019577445,0.00018596648,0.000861975,0.0012943299,0.0007768568,0.00016842186,0.0006298994,0.000026065323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071189814,0.00059652235,0.055350687,0.00073214236,0.00007535285,0.00003051255,0.0059873685,0.00002161092,0.0062173596,0.91994756,0.0014383883,0.008890574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065334328,0.0006841446,0.6540311,0.0075670625,0.0009324832,0.000039402104,0.02750723,0.0011071182,0.009509281,0.17940989,0.11103808,0.0016407571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011729973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017062603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7405377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015298983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030050235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114767725","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17887521","title":"The Right to Silence in Criminal Law: A Shield for Justice or a Loophole for the Guilty?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Silence; Privilege (computing); State (computer science); Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sanctions; Presumption; Lawsuit","score_opus":0.07033495285742981,"score_gpt":0.3498501494438844,"score_spread":0.2795151965864546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114767725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018462326,0.0013290978,0.106522545,0.23932433,0.0020224245,0.01079135,0.00051079923,0.0010632195,0.6199739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743263,0.00028348542,0.00070687314,0.0028552574,0.00041902074,0.0000034423126,0.0000444138,0.00034109643,0.02102008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985521,0.0002264873,0.00020960851,0.00029017738,0.00027968243,0.00044194318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981185,0.0009329624,0.000050182924,0.00034425707,0.00045594326,0.000098106335],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020396626,0.00009101795,0.00009885224,0.00006953163,0.007376602,0.0009688019,0.0016129034,0.000048168884,0.00093195017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058058403,0.000060362905,0.00005211714,0.0005905755,0.00034631684,0.00017930736,0.00048497375,0.00014583032,0.00039711405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006929822,0.00007052771,9.67459e-7,0.00013369383,0.000017064718,0.000004108594,0.011511923,0.00006832287,0.0003413953,0.53711104,0.3894113,0.060636673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023431295,0.0001594921,0.00005240484,0.00006367732,0.00004623508,0.0000025677962,0.0114304,0.00030043445,0.00017856542,0.002037365,0.9854086,0.00008594856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005212174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004415931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001391589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026444512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114804445","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17887522","title":"The Right to Silence in Criminal Law: A Shield for Justice or a Loophole for the Guilty?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Silence; Privilege (computing); State (computer science); Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sanctions; Presumption; Lawsuit","score_opus":0.07033495285742981,"score_gpt":0.3498501494438844,"score_spread":0.2795151965864546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114804445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018462326,0.0013290978,0.106522545,0.23932433,0.0020224245,0.01079135,0.00051079923,0.0010632195,0.6199739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743263,0.00028348542,0.00070687314,0.0028552574,0.00041902074,0.0000034423126,0.0000444138,0.00034109643,0.02102008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985521,0.0002264873,0.00020960851,0.00029017738,0.00027968243,0.00044194318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981185,0.0009329624,0.000050182924,0.00034425707,0.00045594326,0.000098106335],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020396626,0.00009101795,0.00009885224,0.00006953163,0.007376602,0.0009688019,0.0016129034,0.000048168884,0.00093195017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058058403,0.000060362905,0.00005211714,0.0005905755,0.00034631684,0.00017930736,0.00048497375,0.00014583032,0.00039711405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006929822,0.00007052771,9.67459e-7,0.00013369383,0.000017064718,0.000004108594,0.011511923,0.00006832287,0.0003413953,0.53711104,0.3894113,0.060636673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023431295,0.0001594921,0.00005240484,0.00006367732,0.00004623508,0.0000025677962,0.0114304,0.00030043445,0.00017856542,0.002037365,0.9854086,0.00008594856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005212174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004415931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001391589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026444512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115578585","doi":"10.53955/jhcls.v5i3.804","title":"Real Justice, Real Impact with the Prosecutors in Action","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Normative; Legitimacy; Legal certainty; Action (physics); Criminal justice; Enforcement; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.020510308607506748,"score_gpt":0.3485561938184933,"score_spread":0.32804588521098654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115578585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396707,0.00063305843,0.000014453087,0.0014734332,0.0007958242,0.0003686996,0.0000032795206,0.000012484502,0.05702806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862675,0.00027938225,0.000014670834,0.000023868986,0.0013586584,0.0000035094997,5.9553696e-7,0.000006936999,0.012044852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740475,0.0005471809,0.0007289675,0.00024477107,0.0006851117,0.00038921586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841255,0.000117568496,0.0007767107,0.0001619126,0.0003505777,0.00018068904],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013917371,0.000277188,0.0005561719,0.00015648424,0.0019878487,0.0006096456,0.00038629764,0.00023477641,0.000024259547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000115533485,0.000120308236,0.0002030503,0.00047480006,0.00037789624,0.0010019032,0.00003115412,0.00080280576,0.0000027185283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014533933,0.0002538221,0.0028405243,0.0015431809,0.00045433524,0.0012185916,0.0733981,0.00005321551,0.0014879856,0.89845794,0.01850413,0.00033475555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049719885,0.008598921,0.1160159,0.024284033,0.006666867,0.0027633035,0.3376873,0.00010351503,0.0007524575,0.0043023005,0.4922211,0.0016323265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014908731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030887946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058081787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003452946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115599934","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5922524","title":"Different but Equal: Indigenous Criminal Law in Canada, the U.S., and China","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Criminal law; Indigenous; Criminal justice; Legislation","score_opus":0.017583558735787812,"score_gpt":0.27988710391320737,"score_spread":0.26230354517741955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115599934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474444,0.032880697,0.00039207508,0.010625293,0.0020071089,0.00083040603,0.000036756308,0.000014721311,0.0057685357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145576,0.08125119,0.0000064582277,0.0004691624,0.00067701755,0.00002852188,0.0000038313356,0.00002300236,0.0029832646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890955,0.0012793014,0.0011695792,0.00083326467,0.001457652,0.0061646663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977129,0.0005646476,0.00068378734,0.0005062308,0.00015962498,0.00037282004],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005204326,0.00072431326,0.00092491484,0.00016828005,0.0029706066,0.00055451936,0.0020996705,0.0003685861,0.000090705675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016440074,0.0005369137,0.0002821988,0.00034481278,0.0007089727,0.0002481849,0.0007822667,0.011665088,0.0000049000114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003540816,0.00021682451,0.0062896083,0.00028251033,0.00045829805,0.000095174815,0.052967377,0.00023275973,0.000015345953,0.8409905,0.00010987176,0.09798767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011178398,0.0006600077,0.03382985,0.0014989629,0.0010860792,0.0007488369,0.22780262,0.00021945909,0.000052697545,0.71979254,0.011549735,0.0016414012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17483523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01574487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07806566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116122621","doi":"10.1017/9781009608282.003","title":"The Challenges of Preventing the Common Immediate Causes of Wrongful Convictions","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Liability; Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Blame","score_opus":0.05103222579365938,"score_gpt":0.26672466217245594,"score_spread":0.21569243637879656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116122621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026661507,0.0055719353,0.000023950535,0.0012368576,0.0008304032,0.00085074373,0.00022669547,0.000029912115,0.98856336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45485592,0.015281874,0.0000059898684,0.000015748572,0.00011802873,0.0000017004286,0.0000026074883,0.000013866192,0.5297043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741834,0.00047325372,0.0005824338,0.00045926936,0.0006333384,0.00043333438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950682,0.0023481864,0.0010802571,0.0008448497,0.0005349454,0.00012355388],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010104155,0.00037000986,0.0006412488,0.000106089436,0.0022410608,0.000055567296,0.0017426128,0.0003465627,0.0000056331646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012385927,0.0002955643,0.0005288199,0.00003586314,0.003973639,0.00014873214,0.00088297256,0.0006166338,0.00000256012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012054766,0.000023824039,0.00002115208,0.0003271775,0.00033437947,0.000012696601,0.002399108,0.000004329241,0.000034853587,0.9907364,0.0014142155,0.0045712795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003451409,0.0001277721,0.00039399113,0.0016301417,0.0014817057,0.0000030835495,0.020298071,0.000037146947,0.0008974731,0.00018714191,0.9742171,0.0003812042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006599094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013568916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99054927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012931348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039681705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128237023","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i2.335","title":"The Increasing Settlement Costs of Mass Privacy Breaches","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Appeal; Intrusion; Tort; Mass tort; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.08748923583546808,"score_gpt":0.37850383064787857,"score_spread":0.2910145948124105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128237023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10493498,0.14637339,0.00022332779,0.46273565,0.0039170934,0.0032279256,0.00011516481,0.00012741386,0.27834505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443991,0.05208431,0.00010409928,0.0024687108,0.00034113834,0.000017909653,0.0000039692072,0.0000068025943,0.00057391304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900305,0.00026491197,0.00018526187,0.000107629996,0.00019913018,0.00024001344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991539,0.00017119003,0.00010600623,0.00018964005,0.00014534994,0.0002339217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014478018,0.00005791326,0.00011496617,0.000026422416,0.0007096467,0.000048084778,0.00022316567,0.000030078549,0.0003449339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055411004,0.00004467473,0.000051042683,0.0002043711,0.00029121366,0.00011696799,0.000010464843,0.00006389555,0.000089235706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000989417,0.000012991372,0.004314704,0.0006212783,0.000041271043,0.000004155359,0.0016862088,2.1177456e-7,0.0005007128,0.0841087,0.18374345,0.72495645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017728975,0.000011615969,0.0012144957,0.000879297,0.000028208757,0.0000017972148,0.0006552381,0.000002072372,0.000052770196,0.00009098332,0.99699193,0.000053867207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37413645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7691254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8394642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055010186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005757426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6300312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128868511","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Proposition; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.030156999611461857,"score_gpt":0.31012421283079283,"score_spread":0.279967213219331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128868511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36501774,0.0032580728,0.000040831404,0.012988475,0.0033315164,0.00039269746,0.000009686662,0.00015619921,0.61480474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764523,0.001666513,0.0005958827,0.00045534436,0.00089446496,0.000011333826,0.0000043074706,0.000027967584,0.01989188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974887,0.00037935493,0.00030680967,0.00043205812,0.0007133903,0.00067972176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854195,0.00051435246,0.00015139236,0.00041336977,0.0001638348,0.00021512789],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182359,0.0002369894,0.000300142,0.000066898996,0.00033320722,0.0001496377,0.0005583769,0.00025241091,0.005677432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018930594,0.00024019656,0.00016267756,0.00042686446,0.00033287823,0.0008652585,0.00011859836,0.0002718302,0.017525466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017988716,0.00021620916,0.0023357798,0.000290512,0.000038298807,0.000015080371,0.04849273,0.000015361798,0.00026126843,0.916826,0.0017957116,0.029695068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020802449,0.00013894493,0.0015744059,0.00024456723,0.00014296142,0.000008987969,0.02144579,0.00039808397,0.0006108645,0.007462339,0.9674033,0.00036171402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016711785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014215895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9656076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031809887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001725767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130763993","doi":"","title":"Criminalisering van Compliance","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"other","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.3315964532403658,"score_gpt":0.5137177564045362,"score_spread":0.1821213031641704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7130763993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041160814,0.003682283,0.00009155259,0.0040254695,0.0014107059,0.0010266139,0.000081322694,0.00010654074,0.9891639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18760426,0.0042340322,0.00020269614,0.0001092794,0.0017707959,0.00007867494,0.00001824215,0.00011777709,0.8058642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907356,0.0011129125,0.00070525653,0.0014517246,0.0035761136,0.0024183798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996034,0.0009234848,0.00024000311,0.00107463,0.0009422933,0.0007855351],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004988499,0.0005283912,0.00076745055,0.00073698966,0.0021726072,0.00069281633,0.0024435946,0.00067773653,0.1398735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020668986,0.0005582623,0.0003612407,0.0017220484,0.0030684082,0.00034911433,0.0008994968,0.0020887733,0.0077421027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010312455,0.00027109688,0.0005032602,0.0014040804,0.00014022131,0.0010506561,0.0032171218,0.000004619468,0.00012116864,0.19425635,0.76276016,0.036168166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016490502,0.00015724049,0.00053551194,0.0034342331,0.000060320013,0.000006236356,0.009284569,0.00003594231,0.00006018969,0.0038905472,0.98182184,0.0005484618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01192545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2190617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024627318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029229943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132895183","doi":"","title":"Section 24(2): Before and After Grant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Permission; Criminal law; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05806297065017399,"score_gpt":0.33912152839807275,"score_spread":0.2810585577478988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132895183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93591803,0.00010880323,0.000056638994,0.0016601349,0.00029818626,0.000056546185,2.529805e-7,0.00003848132,0.06186291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99152297,0.000040699473,0.00020518192,0.00009188497,0.00016113874,0.0000053581643,1.1278035e-7,0.0000026799967,0.007969971],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996495,0.00002593655,0.00003409337,0.00008364334,0.00009135763,0.0001154701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998479,0.00000952235,0.000013213169,0.000053395393,0.00001900859,0.000056976376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015527102,0.000033647273,0.000039299674,0.000013343681,0.00014184964,0.000018486096,0.000039635557,0.000034176563,0.00041742402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002458717,0.00002922331,0.000014650505,0.00005199208,0.000110365065,0.000105350926,0.00001452894,0.000041862735,0.000036413094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015126167,0.000055195665,0.113359354,0.000039699844,0.000011694981,0.00004333104,0.808084,1.1580763e-7,0.00030140294,0.050912816,0.006248829,0.020792307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018546598,0.00020660149,0.40715834,0.00006373577,0.00004558872,0.000009787466,0.04785557,0.000009130143,0.00053624326,0.011767831,0.5319072,0.00025453008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011585336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030131694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7602284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014110522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014898027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132983535","doi":"","title":"Wrongful Remand: Miscarriages of Justice in the Canadian Bail System","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Conviction; Legitimacy; Jurisprudence; Criminal justice; Plea; Adversarial system; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.04256560876055109,"score_gpt":0.3976901203036725,"score_spread":0.3551245115431214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132983535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45411584,0.005212244,0.0000018428982,0.01118244,0.0044149,0.0013448626,0.0000400647,0.00002783999,0.52365994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734096,0.0003408207,0.000018663417,0.00014985852,0.00031664644,0.00007876983,0.0000665831,0.00002258967,0.02559647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563277,0.0012236558,0.00056587637,0.0005073618,0.0013773766,0.00069295475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997713,0.00075938937,0.0004946187,0.00051811506,0.00026823458,0.00024663183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003320503,0.00031503304,0.0005271533,0.00025594386,0.0019376724,0.00018182048,0.0013975706,0.00032421979,0.0018233118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006926552,0.0002776611,0.00019616868,0.0010288458,0.0002438818,0.00013647298,0.000039666633,0.0007268633,0.00005427013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012998335,0.000059233007,0.00035473885,0.003085347,0.000041818228,0.00018973807,0.921719,0.00019277098,0.0000660809,0.062500946,0.010761112,0.0008992121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116483505,0.00008915615,0.0029035714,0.00060853874,0.00044006517,0.0000061826076,0.88001496,0.00005828056,0.000027257038,0.0000439863,0.11541187,0.00027963513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96232635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5192937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091209996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026298487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133051254","doi":"","title":"Wrongful convictions in Canada and defence counsel: It&apos;s time for mandatory professional education and competency safeguards","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Continuing professional development; Continuing education; Legal profession; Criminal law; Professional responsibility; Professional association; Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.024901201941362167,"score_gpt":0.42221759202034015,"score_spread":0.397316390078978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133051254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806375,0.003351014,0.000040960906,0.0038831176,0.0027665335,0.0014701242,0.0000585483,0.000017826318,0.0077743726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94230264,0.0020088446,0.0004987551,0.00051604246,0.0003272346,0.00019237265,0.00033757722,0.000037076614,0.053779442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972979,0.00017137475,0.00055569416,0.0006871756,0.00069433125,0.0005935219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977994,0.00081440137,0.0003804858,0.00019508123,0.0004719303,0.00033870066],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009928328,0.00036752052,0.0004628277,0.00016563557,0.0011076389,0.00010268005,0.0002438837,0.00031634752,0.00046797396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021396118,0.0004052574,0.00005597018,0.00033444734,0.00033178582,0.00031747622,0.000032965298,0.00040914965,0.000012248697],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002517004,0.0014391546,0.07372587,0.005935559,0.00023216527,0.000046223806,0.69378287,0.000049290953,0.0030894326,0.048428692,0.10623761,0.06451613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009041115,0.0002470294,0.15050142,0.0029901385,0.0003310437,0.000026528674,0.63538444,0.00067445985,0.00015728675,0.0015840832,0.20581801,0.0013814296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9148796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99283546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0995804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080604706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016800413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133089547","doi":"","title":"The Criminal Trial: Morality Play and Rule of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Criminal law; Permission; Rule of law; Due process; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.09998112650732016,"score_gpt":0.42494406741610885,"score_spread":0.3249629409087887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133089547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.869851,0.00026667872,0.000027606236,0.030260162,0.00019017968,0.00013626016,0.0000014866678,0.000021023357,0.099245615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99098045,0.00015962432,0.00005125203,0.000058217032,0.00010188565,0.0000037767884,4.490674e-8,0.0000022160136,0.008642527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999397,0.00011262052,0.000081678794,0.00008509812,0.00018061021,0.00014301595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992834,0.00046049326,0.000047073812,0.00011639377,0.000038385497,0.00005430219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007751837,0.00003777186,0.00007193605,0.0000049037767,0.00033092292,0.000029005183,0.0001279244,0.000029000936,0.000068847694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002573921,0.00001953881,0.000025452788,0.000031655312,0.0006718893,0.00008551907,0.000030373636,0.000026911057,0.000013768113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008442449,0.000015631771,0.00013965875,0.000007361682,0.0000041914086,0.000001079917,0.013732259,3.6433473e-8,0.00074936415,0.97586876,0.0022098573,0.0064275335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031854154,0.000192145,0.0023540216,0.000067854446,0.000049315022,0.0000011897105,0.015595653,8.65273e-7,0.003579941,0.028179357,0.94664556,0.00014865914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00895744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00483741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015603497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041017254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134507383","doi":"","title":"The programmed death of the \"juge d'instruction\" to the \"procureur-roi\"","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"theses.fr (ABES)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Death with dignity; Order (exchange); Tort","score_opus":0.06464920727855736,"score_gpt":0.3327394691165588,"score_spread":0.26809026183800144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134507383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7181815,0.0154023105,0.000081424,0.13785225,0.009755262,0.0020735061,0.000034001474,0.00009411976,0.11652566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915747,0.00068170845,0.00016406251,0.00058399426,0.0019016976,0.00009793392,6.263316e-7,0.00002605474,0.0049692034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964917,0.00077563484,0.0004251717,0.00027559247,0.00095448195,0.0010774432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974586,0.0009229559,0.0002632604,0.0008817742,0.00019892049,0.00027449653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026909388,0.00026386895,0.0002594846,0.000023625656,0.0020390016,0.00018509767,0.0017161252,0.0001601855,0.00022867974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010131078,0.00012622423,0.0002779208,0.0008064178,0.0015408974,0.000407589,0.00036306636,0.00041831276,0.00047209882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003995025,0.00013183027,0.011496173,0.00003885475,0.00005205453,6.1781043e-7,0.03988376,0.000012486874,0.00007436807,0.85369587,0.0016783336,0.092895694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011317192,0.000071173665,0.015392556,0.00014605481,0.00014961456,0.000015932252,0.026119858,0.000010320246,0.0008134414,0.005582141,0.9513956,0.00019018275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016737983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058067627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9497172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015426475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017077064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135887461","doi":"","title":"The role of the Right to a Fair Trial in an Era of Social Polarisation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VU Research Portal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Fair trial; Right to a fair trial","score_opus":0.06743268374124958,"score_gpt":0.46145384281175256,"score_spread":0.39402115907050295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135887461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414364,0.000053112817,0.0000016204882,0.010118669,0.00012558441,0.00047891622,0.000006713993,0.0000042894762,0.04777466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990198,0.0000075494854,0.0000075486123,0.000017099464,0.00012950986,0.000020832873,7.6616107e-7,0.0000018066303,0.00079507596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809664,0.00062587304,0.00018946143,0.00010486212,0.00074400724,0.0002391426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992364,0.00035203865,0.000040999406,0.00014344665,0.0001890412,0.0000380722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003535484,0.000032523185,0.00008123385,0.000058669288,0.0006050247,0.000046794034,0.00047170807,0.000054566663,0.00008197911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011217868,0.000019957402,0.000050088885,0.0006908199,0.00044022975,0.00011184374,0.000095848496,0.00024293624,0.000003034633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030347886,0.0002111015,0.015966412,0.000013303181,0.000012195521,0.0000025224542,0.03211577,0.0000027669262,0.0052894787,0.9165191,0.0045322836,0.022300297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052318946,0.00081897574,0.31635013,0.00019436069,0.000024016963,2.9435958e-7,0.13199979,0.000089095985,0.017069181,0.12008038,0.40791342,0.00022847172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012723167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07198006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7964387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004086749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006698536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139462042","doi":"","title":"R. v. S.A.B:Putting self-incrimination in context","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Legislation; Chose; Context (archaeology); Search and seizure","score_opus":0.06872243031623743,"score_gpt":0.3339493224873253,"score_spread":0.26522689217108786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139462042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5272032,0.0000433405,0.00008091945,0.0036850837,0.00008901475,0.00035635525,0.000010188865,0.00013148983,0.4684004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98127216,0.0002471989,0.0006530315,0.000036505193,0.00006593381,1.2713454e-7,0.000007962931,0.000009149259,0.017707933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973688,0.00033056224,0.00013496562,0.00046516643,0.000905308,0.00079517474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986539,0.00026135077,0.00007599168,0.00022770891,0.00042175257,0.00035929412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015053903,0.00013884956,0.00019508574,0.0010533486,0.0015036286,0.00008021374,0.00073214376,0.00019589745,0.00017117259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002485182,0.00018604788,0.00010687795,0.0021113968,0.0006306938,0.0013087528,0.00027664308,0.0005401178,0.00010093497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013816201,0.00027448317,0.005151677,0.00003477956,0.000022434157,0.003610723,0.016991686,0.000025389967,0.00017302687,0.9671088,0.0037421363,0.002726701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018545483,0.00018996627,0.005370924,0.00017095251,0.000040843894,0.000006518635,0.2682354,0.000015443598,0.00027988278,0.005520706,0.7179316,0.0003831744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03134516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081948005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011564824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011658707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7148972342","doi":"10.70675/880d715bz4b00z4eb7z8189ze3f19eb21717","title":"L'auto-incrimination","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Proposition; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03723981696856513,"score_gpt":0.37620084564433603,"score_spread":0.3389610286757709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7148972342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13217624,0.00056366064,0.0003050353,0.0021242169,0.007926168,0.00092107314,0.0000055300443,0.00012015385,0.8558579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6409885,0.0007754224,0.00009906086,0.00017525574,0.00032854287,0.000017379582,0.00016465875,0.000024305054,0.35742682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964838,0.00023697772,0.0006038196,0.000766247,0.0012789633,0.0006301741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980693,0.0003575759,0.00042214242,0.0003916455,0.00055273564,0.00020662323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092922634,0.00040925108,0.00048137395,0.00018197061,0.0008634059,0.00035352597,0.0006972139,0.0007350144,0.011301688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034319292,0.00041717495,0.0003187214,0.00046999275,0.00016990124,0.0006954705,0.000042355536,0.00041676874,0.009735566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030682198,0.00041775848,0.0009607663,0.0018506931,0.0001373326,0.000020736326,0.2075806,0.00002240546,0.0026463906,0.53397864,0.027543921,0.22453396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000430363,0.00041049742,0.008417721,0.0010858495,0.00072520523,0.0000027389856,0.36867428,0.0016585814,0.0020989296,0.0030003893,0.6116273,0.001868183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011607963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051077707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5840833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022328748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082762324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161795956","doi":"10.82308/1543","title":"Research on entrapment in China--with reference to the experience in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Power (physics); Jurisprudence; Medical jurisprudence; Human rights","score_opus":0.11931989009463131,"score_gpt":0.4436338901052293,"score_spread":0.32431400001059796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161795956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7022775,0.000024717903,6.623552e-7,0.0033491675,0.00011609653,0.00035473812,0.0000010138234,0.000004333588,0.29387182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845641,0.00007999422,0.000012834618,0.00022841047,0.000035685018,0.00018167643,0.000009816654,0.000006241265,0.01488123],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973468,0.00033353147,0.00018365539,0.00034457183,0.0012939243,0.00049752794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992245,0.00030429638,0.00003556914,0.00023970145,0.00007846916,0.00011745602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012547019,0.00011260892,0.00014770849,0.00012676213,0.0002862895,0.000076228396,0.0006705654,0.00007259109,0.00035740552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017604885,0.00007019989,0.000010504767,0.0006259601,0.00005445482,0.000056834768,0.000020311056,0.00049028324,0.00003764255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013213205,0.00020265598,0.024987767,0.00016766068,0.00001062883,0.00018004078,0.45183498,0.00089788804,0.000053908567,0.448454,0.028183753,0.04370542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010049131,0.00014789587,0.2834098,0.0007435581,0.0000020335851,2.0170351e-7,0.40204856,0.000007461012,0.0002462461,0.00019920974,0.31281242,0.00028212628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44825476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011401566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028847225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5117374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161799514","doi":"10.82308/52543","title":"The theory, design and reform of the exclusionary rule: A comparative study between Canada and China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Charter; Rule of law; China; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Substantive rights; Judicial review; Judicial reform","score_opus":0.041376451915862436,"score_gpt":0.3446385841210607,"score_spread":0.30326213220519826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161799514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96372926,0.001197571,0.000005460303,0.00076493545,0.00020550321,0.000577873,0.0000069187868,0.000004974334,0.033507515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812006,0.00019153957,0.00002426892,0.000018611185,0.0000460718,0.000014013965,0.000007823882,0.0000042197103,0.018492889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984712,0.0006042283,0.00017861598,0.00017094146,0.00044138168,0.00013363862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987394,0.00082953676,0.00013254877,0.00014890864,0.00009801375,0.00005155441],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001023888,0.00010983006,0.00021214203,0.000010125228,0.0014091425,0.000060213333,0.0002654349,0.000058369184,0.00003407133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008636613,0.00005391972,0.000024844918,0.00012236899,0.0002039017,0.00005628256,0.00007581703,0.00015552955,1.5124091e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006646147,0.00024371129,0.029154593,0.0002482089,0.00064655964,0.000029187053,0.7419237,0.0000048336155,0.000067948065,0.17093082,0.01014332,0.045942515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007784651,0.000057890404,0.39997384,0.00009267682,0.0001110777,5.0393044e-7,0.5925577,0.0000030365431,0.00008667819,0.00486222,0.0020612509,0.000115237744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8734214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98744845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37081924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008955489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010532027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161811057","doi":"10.82308/54264","title":"The Canadian criminal legislative response to hate crimes /","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Criminal justice; Discretion; Criminal law; Hate crime","score_opus":0.04296545352274738,"score_gpt":0.38049060603525525,"score_spread":0.33752515251250786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161811057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05249193,0.00041610256,0.0000017703001,0.03376914,0.0011191353,0.00042292016,0.0000100091165,0.000050062667,0.9117189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4691884,0.000092955524,0.00012394544,0.00065801525,0.00039752957,0.000035139594,0.000016944534,0.00001444988,0.52947265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799955,0.00034912987,0.00020785682,0.0002879991,0.00056046114,0.0005950036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828154,0.0006067058,0.000073664036,0.0002262299,0.00032118076,0.0004906548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015761199,0.00017672103,0.00015636985,0.00014060283,0.0033183033,0.0005370144,0.00057320145,0.00021912073,0.0006665984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013900496,0.00013276254,0.00009339778,0.00021917526,0.0001535497,0.00017817895,0.000012002036,0.00025123442,0.00073811016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021307128,0.000019691388,0.00005213558,0.000023613266,0.00004794373,0.000052911808,0.35634685,0.000007819961,0.000113630835,0.36526754,0.22019954,0.055737626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002630953,0.000039770282,0.0060374523,0.000053601194,0.000041752057,4.2917043e-7,0.063799806,9.923161e-7,0.000096893746,0.0003963031,0.9293065,0.00020015825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9056751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99955404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.709107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058689236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040208194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7163563281","doi":"10.18192/politika.8207","title":"Abolishing Mandatory Minimum Sentencing as a Beneficial Reconciliation Measure","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Politika – Undergraduate Journal of International Affairs Politics and Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Term (time); Deterrence (psychology)","score_opus":0.03230516201697104,"score_gpt":0.33382970056727107,"score_spread":0.30152453855030004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7163563281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59096193,0.0013347226,0.00007413799,0.30376458,0.0069671734,0.0003098881,0.0004425726,0.000084089406,0.09606088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97177404,0.012871403,0.0000856756,0.001594142,0.010081661,0.0000041553935,0.000023497203,0.000057679004,0.0035077531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936942,0.0004462272,0.001749974,0.00047710293,0.0022572943,0.0013752184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945952,0.0008691849,0.0014716127,0.00024057979,0.0017350019,0.0010884115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025245585,0.0005124316,0.00072457077,0.0015267758,0.0010220133,0.00092324195,0.00094811356,0.0002981223,0.0001334022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003535576,0.00052865373,0.0005353413,0.0009115083,0.000644448,0.0015523141,0.00029356973,0.0007979814,0.00031051028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016214763,0.00015808405,0.00207564,0.00018101928,0.00050707813,0.00023841647,0.018655915,0.00013302914,0.00026867675,0.95356846,0.017841462,0.0062100613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024222468,0.00073816517,0.0058399714,0.0022118127,0.0005406706,0.0011859685,0.13132359,0.0018636696,0.00061126845,0.5765155,0.27549642,0.0012507021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017009892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015142829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38081208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013309894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031233833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72209951","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.157","title":"Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Criminal law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08588962696890812,"score_gpt":0.396669655413895,"score_spread":0.31078002844498687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72209951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9471135,0.0005735718,0.00026990197,0.03911034,0.00009536959,0.0001567218,0.0000016707347,0.000010375523,0.012668516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497503,0.00015359899,0.0005396928,0.0034627186,0.0006165787,0.0000053050476,2.2705353e-7,0.000008865221,0.00023798046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973355,0.0009055475,0.00048070538,0.00014594595,0.0006608977,0.0004714056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802023,0.0007524623,0.0006140242,0.00020214442,0.0002447765,0.0001663643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017434515,0.00017218548,0.00043284363,0.000059326463,0.00065341685,0.000121883786,0.00088199537,0.000025018187,0.00013893563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036225825,0.00009445448,0.00014912587,0.0004440144,0.0028899307,0.00039280122,0.000048638114,0.00055684726,0.000051223044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020095382,0.00046235166,0.0013920051,0.000017131253,0.00012043068,0.00006516217,0.2747269,0.0048110858,0.00052853645,0.69160914,0.019767959,0.00448975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011458979,0.0017858156,0.04513986,0.00039676554,0.00057695445,0.000631423,0.7117659,0.00045278145,0.0009031598,0.042483468,0.19402562,0.00069237873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001679772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6491257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017858866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005429025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W78769640","doi":"","title":"Gilles Létourneau, Pierre Robert. \"Code de procédure pénale du Québec, annoté\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.0204237918361292,"score_gpt":0.2635721819699471,"score_spread":0.2431483901338179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W78769640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36468482,0.06559166,0.0014558238,0.12528847,0.0026478064,0.0009205468,0.00009111334,0.0002792615,0.43904048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541425,0.0048931157,0.0015810116,0.0009906134,0.0016023943,0.00005586215,0.000006804664,0.00006112612,0.13666658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965596,0.00049598824,0.0005129752,0.00063688174,0.00041226903,0.001382284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810475,0.00035148914,0.00025206205,0.00047069925,0.00018919112,0.0006318199],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013081974,0.00030582692,0.00050274405,0.00008362321,0.00085163384,0.00015489041,0.0006713977,0.0004573865,0.0022035968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092390267,0.00045150818,0.00036022696,0.00063724344,0.00071121345,0.000577336,0.000070984825,0.0005736542,0.00090169365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008461391,0.0007377271,0.06039731,0.0013015026,0.00015285793,0.0009596002,0.03397548,0.0009915258,0.00051240914,0.74108505,0.13075389,0.029048061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029068097,0.000118290176,0.0023421953,0.00070198794,0.00021106582,0.0005063048,0.0030211927,0.0004646291,0.0003865184,0.025340438,0.9659921,0.0006245972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05553752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15495865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8352382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012915527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016741224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W79884336","doi":"10.21991/c9j380","title":"Failing Students by Taking a Pass on the Charter in Pridgen v University of Calgary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02695350916186013,"score_gpt":0.2769865945668648,"score_spread":0.2500330854050047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W79884336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7260185,0.0006529572,0.023261817,0.05909259,0.0015784513,0.0026068273,0.00014490935,0.00016535529,0.18647861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985594,0.00006576147,0.00011099989,0.0006329083,0.000038364313,0.000015551617,0.0000129960035,0.0000035510702,0.0005604625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981282,0.00014493408,0.00028312186,0.0003018896,0.00063591544,0.000505942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989659,0.00032583528,0.00017662461,0.00020910092,0.00019207007,0.0001304305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005653168,0.00015823371,0.0002016867,0.00009948854,0.0013766793,0.00008353048,0.0005879554,0.00012520583,0.0007542191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003773982,0.00013847348,0.00011467806,0.00029080594,0.0046185493,0.0005922052,0.00013903943,0.00023658024,0.00026367747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026020003,0.00010716105,0.054372095,0.00000739998,0.000021669612,0.000009001147,0.0005196012,0.00005561591,0.00030648103,0.9362585,0.007680188,0.0006362644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003683406,0.00024575842,0.05800363,0.0018477746,0.00014482834,0.00003810681,0.07571918,0.0016478632,0.00081890717,0.03874738,0.81747085,0.001632322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006061234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002052957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025493905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006749371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80164192","doi":"","title":"Les appels administratifs au Canada (Administrative Appeals in Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Standard of review; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07004114231247068,"score_gpt":0.331068986672506,"score_spread":0.26102784436003534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80164192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.794097,0.030972889,0.0001993953,0.091267705,0.003990699,0.00035792196,0.000058985614,0.000011091659,0.07904428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98173827,0.0019724723,0.000024390281,0.0002738526,0.0011944792,0.0000059710665,0.0000038164662,0.000020825277,0.014765932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922655,0.0006703896,0.00069101754,0.0003572297,0.0014148066,0.0046010595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981305,0.00026529102,0.0003680155,0.0001819307,0.00023857641,0.0008156731],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034964585,0.00032830687,0.0004408188,0.000054880507,0.000597906,0.00010356961,0.0007101418,0.000154036,0.00014855094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042057314,0.00034016202,0.00008600659,0.0004989825,0.00033527246,0.0004166338,0.00004380745,0.0026145587,0.000015778036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018734834,0.00013469486,0.046392977,0.000049445476,0.00016798991,0.0006455881,0.006273327,0.00024085569,0.000008433063,0.8771487,0.012561931,0.056188736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097202417,0.00092168036,0.005591434,0.00041502804,0.00012391248,0.0010711272,0.4205149,0.00007994824,0.0000768643,0.08469063,0.4845726,0.0009698406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79245806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05525892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.55355716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80501292","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1489","title":"Book Review: Essays in the History of Canadian Law, Volume VIII: in Honour of R. C. B. Risk, by G. Blaine Baker and Jim Phillips (eds)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Volume (thermodynamics); Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.021528734559580084,"score_gpt":0.2571350853691778,"score_spread":0.2356063508095977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80501292","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032814515,0.52061504,0.00000806416,0.01677041,0.00026517388,0.00025149493,0.000024563868,0.0000054050174,0.4587784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.764082,0.22987022,0.000045940236,0.003968287,0.000110090674,0.0000043262016,0.0000018456125,0.000009316444,0.0019079527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789715,0.0006722729,0.0004778742,0.00015537045,0.00041579606,0.00038155026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905163,0.00017780476,0.00028020528,0.00016490513,0.000104970575,0.00022045498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032267843,0.00011958399,0.00031566346,0.00012543863,0.00030692425,0.000027698894,0.00039347564,0.00009002796,0.0008385926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024098778,0.00009677392,0.00007831943,0.00026628783,0.0005593463,0.000351133,0.000020606769,0.00051550666,0.0000068747368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054651475,0.00017376442,0.007737141,0.00016045716,0.00002110265,0.00024869398,0.012656515,0.0000171722,0.00007575559,0.14443737,0.8293638,0.005053553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023713883,0.000041191244,0.001137578,0.00061681075,0.000033888988,0.00006518861,0.0007769191,0.000011310172,0.0000042585893,0.0026031025,0.9943585,0.00011411535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9396401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99011356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7608006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003303851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031415984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9182001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W812244214","doi":"10.21991/c9h091","title":"Judicialization or Renunciation? Judges in Today’s Landscape of Anti-Terrorism Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Terrorism; Judicial review; Political science; Constitution; Renunciation; Suspect; Constitutional law; Enforcement","score_opus":0.0675757815920345,"score_gpt":0.33689811964666444,"score_spread":0.2693223380546299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W812244214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3712869,0.0033833485,0.068764135,0.07755244,0.009784953,0.00299067,0.0005229796,0.00062902836,0.46508557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803543,0.00013805095,0.00053330464,0.0005289399,0.00022224376,0.00004054274,0.00009195938,0.0000069029475,0.0004026028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737847,0.00017048037,0.00067675085,0.00037836333,0.0008242484,0.00057166704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983725,0.00021487457,0.00026936593,0.00024103098,0.00064394163,0.00025832054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011321565,0.00021048886,0.00037989378,0.00031757937,0.00068059796,0.00007350817,0.00034801906,0.00023686206,0.00030766672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023824216,0.00019780928,0.00011152789,0.0008325436,0.003379106,0.0010165728,0.00010158598,0.00017501114,0.00010478324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007967029,0.00010574791,0.19606204,0.000013995808,0.000013787029,0.000019336087,0.00080742675,0.0010005755,0.00003525956,0.7900522,0.011527094,0.00028291205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005540887,0.00029862416,0.022743762,0.0009836848,0.00018096784,0.00014576293,0.05616895,0.0013403419,0.0005758893,0.117647015,0.7929221,0.0014520102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020763755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013328649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.781395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041648685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8127670","doi":"10.1093/nar/22.3.332","title":"SASKATCHEWAN OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nucleic Acids Research","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Economic Justice; Freedom of information; Order (exchange); Section (typography); Law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Business; Psychology; Advertising","score_opus":0.05381806012043803,"score_gpt":0.3684252796566635,"score_spread":0.31460721953622545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8127670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90161365,0.00007431736,0.000020899619,0.008694694,0.00004507342,0.00018023004,0.0000025361253,0.000014904665,0.089353666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965706,0.00002466703,0.00015512342,0.000043590495,0.00006630057,0.0000032850908,9.5182736e-7,0.000002613304,0.0031328902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854654,0.00024380157,0.00014248017,0.00006868008,0.00077639223,0.00022211752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.00020550995,0.000038586528,0.00018392157,0.00022832096,0.0000566211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016014909,0.000037663696,0.000062019295,0.0000498801,0.00068671507,0.00008195955,0.00035056588,0.00005948392,0.00014243621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044167208,0.00002561596,0.000024123892,0.00036321464,0.00068020634,0.00037683098,0.00018219987,0.00018904562,0.000039620267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002818048,0.00028244645,0.14298712,0.00033945244,0.000019530833,0.0000035253574,0.13510463,0.000023607341,0.012869914,0.2809918,0.2767536,0.15034258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012222673,0.00002942114,0.12402807,0.000047945618,0.0000031867746,7.624338e-7,0.014448937,0.000033207136,0.00085887173,0.0035666525,0.85680455,0.00005615652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022075512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002263068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58005095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045956458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002585721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813148417","doi":"10.1515/9780773580961-012","title":"Confidential Information and Privacy Related Law in Canada and in International Instruments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Internet privacy; Law; Business; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.011870945948242085,"score_gpt":0.21630626146355642,"score_spread":0.20443531551531433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W813148417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015652772,7.9452235e-7,7.3955016e-7,0.00038788698,0.00031881192,0.00026625907,0.00009536491,0.000016889875,0.98326045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8043948,0.00025979575,0.00004067098,0.0001260748,0.000023497594,7.1991013e-7,0.000030681866,0.0000086454165,0.1951151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990461,0.000038585124,0.00021390487,0.0001938704,0.00033182572,0.00017573113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950546,0.000050626255,0.00016179119,0.000104843704,0.000070576854,0.00010672824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014701304,0.00014247558,0.00017879391,0.0001472333,0.00023860553,0.00005804093,0.00025314934,0.0002454579,0.000040586765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023108696,0.0001788337,0.000022123924,0.000009912704,0.00025813235,0.0005453497,0.00026656143,0.00043262797,0.0000012822916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006666812,0.000002876053,0.0004156361,0.000023893948,0.00001926612,0.000057755027,0.0012928735,0.0000012503905,0.0000022542106,0.9958574,0.000054715787,0.0022054052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051615253,0.000008124297,0.00059760583,0.00014459789,0.000021020442,0.0000018106701,0.00041723973,0.000007381454,0.000019044555,0.0014226938,0.99665046,0.00019384659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9754435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.689586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99659574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005415829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027192297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72926265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W824787426","doi":"","title":"The American Exclusion Rule Debate: Looking to England and Canada for Guidance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exclusionary rule; Law; Adversarial system; Confession (law); Magistrate; Political science; Adjudication; Suspect; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Search and seizure; Statute; Warrant; Supreme court; Constitution; Probable cause; Economic Justice; Business","score_opus":0.01913004110962151,"score_gpt":0.31507131750670125,"score_spread":0.29594127639707973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W824787426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22603662,0.11559786,0.0029020966,0.45203167,0.00837263,0.0057017957,0.00017698694,0.00018844323,0.18899189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96610284,0.015648505,0.0004002604,0.013049354,0.00031884745,0.00006728794,0.000005190755,0.000015868343,0.0043918556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853545,0.00022212816,0.00026760463,0.00021648957,0.00048483972,0.000273487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846864,0.0008742346,0.00016170161,0.00017755266,0.00020770826,0.000110162924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002117532,0.00010952148,0.00017060139,0.000010037179,0.0013161137,0.00017543718,0.00054341054,0.000016440892,0.000038932198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008689731,0.00006855544,0.00005634742,0.00011553969,0.0002073848,0.000120459175,0.000076675184,0.00009429607,0.000007225593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026510796,0.000012910195,0.0008584946,0.00013388804,0.00002888338,0.000004220495,0.0008237638,0.000004916567,0.000043223958,0.9357026,0.023560906,0.038799644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150185,0.000014296043,0.00022212024,0.0004971753,0.000019351526,0.000005363791,0.00017404734,0.000010231451,0.000024817682,0.002021088,0.9968474,0.00010262183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48141068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91477627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97328645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018962278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020515497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825869049","doi":"","title":"THE POTENTIAL LEGAL AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF LOWERING THE CRIMINAL CODE BAC LIMIT IN CANADA","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALCOHOL, DRUGS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Criminal code; Enforcement; Limit (mathematics); Code (set theory); Law enforcement; Law; Speed limit; Political science; Penal code; Criminal law; Business; Engineering; Transport engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04301882283141481,"score_gpt":0.30200008905452924,"score_spread":0.25898126622311446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825869049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86555916,0.00011136706,0.0000021365531,0.094812706,0.00017516848,0.00017793897,0.000032406766,0.0000066334333,0.039122466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997837,0.0013707575,0.000012670868,0.0002053457,0.00008954769,0.000010034289,4.6489401e-7,0.0000045941138,0.00046956333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890715,0.000016207194,0.0002828478,0.00017253372,0.0004232374,0.00019800145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925953,0.00016631476,0.00018838688,0.00007456127,0.00025371686,0.000057483237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043425692,0.00009723236,0.00011747463,0.00004120254,0.00048914953,0.00010783443,0.00061711913,0.000031755655,0.000042750027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021742521,0.00005820406,0.000042781598,0.00015563217,0.00047407704,0.00016264728,0.00010753513,0.00017093378,5.685844e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108254804,0.000049594764,0.0028665713,0.000025745716,0.000035424262,4.4601026e-7,0.005337864,0.000096082185,0.0004245463,0.9534629,0.00070068985,0.036891863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027427305,0.0002971917,0.6984644,0.0013070598,0.00028799725,0.00009753944,0.13926014,0.025671897,0.001944451,0.020181738,0.108655825,0.0010890585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15103726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23591404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013640747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003089263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85461605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W832122363","doi":"10.1163/15730352-40012001","title":"Understanding Russia’s Low Rate of Acquittal: Pretrial Screening and the Problem of Accusatorial Bias","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eesti Teadusfondi","keywords":"Acquittal; Discretion; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.24749195321097,"score_gpt":0.32619949215944577,"score_spread":0.07870753894847576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W832122363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124710076,0.2997305,0.0022879096,0.023908986,0.0022743423,0.0047786543,0.00010468829,0.00011176877,0.54209304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674227,0.03198951,0.00013898782,0.00012430082,0.0002825301,6.27e-7,0.0000012945918,0.0000067774145,0.000033232576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981526,0.00087506365,0.0003975393,0.00012345934,0.0002596123,0.00019168542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992215,0.00014637865,0.00031288894,0.00009400512,0.000094407034,0.00013081571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036893063,0.00008662367,0.00034174687,0.000012897718,0.00011327857,0.000030768755,0.00016725044,0.000019957604,0.00001226476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033881064,0.000052968066,0.0000825871,0.00013475887,0.00092566176,0.00017665619,0.00008468482,0.00006190444,8.27685e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004564363,0.000026943333,0.00034670264,0.0038408397,0.00003676257,0.0000029845723,0.004889121,0.0000046850278,0.000034542598,0.9821174,0.0010065357,0.0072370097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012970466,0.000882642,0.0020291952,0.07847002,0.0013742984,0.000024901377,0.011711878,0.00012469185,0.0004324892,0.024004294,0.86697143,0.0010037096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046086276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058444683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95811313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014702981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34106392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W916319588","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2806","title":"Book Note: Speaking Out on Human Rights: Debating Canada’s Human Rights System, by Pearl Eliadis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pearl; Human rights; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05604149994742987,"score_gpt":0.3409321369111774,"score_spread":0.28489063696374756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W916319588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00786778,0.00087879895,0.000110711844,0.0019133611,0.001282613,0.00019359164,0.000013626174,0.00009441524,0.9876451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879377,0.00000303825,0.00016295325,0.0004999565,0.001695187,0.0000042365573,0.0000070525853,0.000025724648,0.009664186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961044,0.00047212077,0.0006196777,0.00037290595,0.0015871647,0.00084373215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979723,0.00012591096,0.00043463896,0.00028276554,0.00032048038,0.00086389936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001608695,0.00028443008,0.00037814904,0.000060458933,0.00789635,0.000619317,0.0007419934,0.00015431836,0.00032785613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000626576,0.00023666608,0.0001327974,0.00008919266,0.00024477634,0.0006916205,0.000062230596,0.0006734716,0.00009633361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024007655,0.00006562567,0.00012120041,0.000031442883,0.00003723217,0.00041373397,0.005909836,0.000032937947,0.0002615404,0.77731806,0.21566795,0.00011644618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000536341,0.0001566659,0.00003467289,0.000750005,0.000076605174,0.00009023491,0.0023822146,0.000025809217,0.00044966466,0.009263529,0.98574847,0.00048580221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001818088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004230578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W937076574","doi":"","title":"Chronique de jurisprudence: Arrêts de la Cour suprême du Canada en droit criminel, cuvée 2007","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Art; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.00995786280144436,"score_gpt":0.2750865707742725,"score_spread":0.26512870797282817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W937076574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682507,0.008999386,0.001241148,0.05163524,0.0014573376,0.00048314733,0.000083472645,0.00013794737,0.067711584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95166725,0.0065750205,0.0013042804,0.002539052,0.003924689,0.000026967602,0.000011163461,0.000045120167,0.033906456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555194,0.0007526895,0.0005749333,0.0006491388,0.00063151616,0.0018397828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723774,0.0009320216,0.0002406811,0.0004994203,0.00017539653,0.0009147211],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025821957,0.00034770867,0.00056679803,0.00008477539,0.0006033132,0.00023713191,0.0010824569,0.00062480324,0.0011289716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091421773,0.0005577362,0.00024064975,0.0005070689,0.00062714063,0.00050449226,0.000075678465,0.0008587497,0.00015427798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016840585,0.00070877414,0.02478101,0.001134944,0.00012919707,0.007232212,0.028099436,0.0016095261,0.0026840586,0.5081316,0.3938402,0.031480633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073063327,0.00047905036,0.058695193,0.0017648335,0.0004935787,0.0020721687,0.00418799,0.0026280598,0.0017354612,0.1250595,0.8004674,0.0016861394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71709025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54652524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4066272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005796652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005533848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93869013","doi":"","title":"Traité général de preuve et de procédure pénales, 7e édition (P.Béliveau, M.Vauclair).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03227399737557953,"score_gpt":0.30198079831733,"score_spread":0.2697068009417505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93869013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8074095,0.0062885517,0.0021624432,0.051391844,0.00093762466,0.00080298167,0.00012397279,0.00026045513,0.13062261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94320256,0.0059445733,0.002222249,0.0020090956,0.0028046481,0.00010146249,0.00005265283,0.00006891015,0.043593865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575454,0.0007486154,0.0005637926,0.000705862,0.0005218927,0.001705275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800175,0.0003842163,0.00029268904,0.00043154662,0.00017196247,0.00071780925],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017697577,0.0003320089,0.00050627644,0.0001180856,0.00066980073,0.0002664912,0.0007550621,0.0006809948,0.0012262434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039908144,0.00052865007,0.0004007956,0.0007322596,0.0006661748,0.0010012513,0.000093585244,0.000857472,0.0006109221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004130625,0.0016770915,0.039822984,0.0018703393,0.00019850604,0.0022860267,0.082371555,0.0014688476,0.0026027549,0.77149504,0.053018752,0.04277506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012949588,0.00095822074,0.08625523,0.0035323086,0.0008117164,0.0032145192,0.009779424,0.002907782,0.0009358122,0.2677124,0.6206556,0.0019420406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006136858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009936593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56763685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002434897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011528592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W950222520","doi":"","title":"Reactie op artikel Cor van Montfort over ontwikkelingen rond toezicht","year":2010,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.028271435110794385,"score_gpt":0.3303729805875001,"score_spread":0.3021015454767057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W950222520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5476183,0.00039154748,0.0000820031,0.0052674166,0.003721421,0.00039478083,0.000016260707,0.00013115568,0.4423771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593338,0.00025763657,0.00044794643,0.0009535083,0.0015682727,0.000012651895,0.000005450506,0.000026831933,0.13739388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969112,0.000082098355,0.0005114492,0.0006581121,0.0009149432,0.0009221732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981041,0.00028816925,0.0002104463,0.0006384684,0.00019384509,0.00056497526],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010749935,0.0003334349,0.0004072246,0.00006708435,0.0008005226,0.0003640445,0.0007132968,0.0004112586,0.022748064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004422696,0.000300578,0.00024858152,0.00031023426,0.00051194616,0.0009462279,0.00017432883,0.0007286079,0.0046365308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004790198,0.0012601822,0.03690312,0.00017346327,0.00029211852,0.00022801325,0.030085243,0.000031854248,0.035626736,0.25189096,0.5608518,0.08217747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003056284,0.0001626927,0.013595936,0.000053731954,0.00018901992,0.0000065865015,0.0046697697,0.0003237626,0.0012219587,0.004712244,0.97413576,0.00062288356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049583297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17423058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41328397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010786063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004277021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9525550","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1059","title":"The Ontario Tenant Protection Act: A Trust Betrayed","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.055566843752669084,"score_gpt":0.3433718898515991,"score_spread":0.28780504609893004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9525550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7981616,0.0001046705,0.000031265492,0.1207629,0.00038299564,0.00016589588,8.7787964e-7,0.000013140583,0.080376655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918532,0.00027321622,0.00001593087,0.00060924696,0.0028459053,0.0000016719785,6.646743e-8,0.0000040286573,0.004396762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906373,0.00010578059,0.0002168732,0.0000562093,0.00031513543,0.00024228702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995008,0.00005133507,0.00018939747,0.00003772084,0.00012516936,0.00009557138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087856373,0.00006136929,0.0001283532,0.000032152122,0.0020178317,0.00018658912,0.00014521174,0.00007718104,0.000021580234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009970116,0.000034292378,0.000099637495,0.0001067172,0.0003670447,0.00026549236,0.000015951791,0.0002386025,0.0000030375124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041040953,0.0000847452,0.0012384834,0.000010425945,0.000059052003,0.000037100774,0.17717285,5.936269e-7,0.0002287982,0.7285743,0.001845917,0.09033734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018897977,0.00012829668,0.0071091186,0.000013879627,0.000022560102,0.000033873494,0.004204021,6.6629497e-7,0.000014643236,0.014047412,0.97417545,0.00006108508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3055324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42352408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97232956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002466377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050099596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W980562234","doi":"","title":"Entrapment as defence: a brief overview of the law in England, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, and USA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IIUM Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; New england; Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.10889036203707377,"score_gpt":0.30822707856558434,"score_spread":0.1993367165285106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W980562234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112140905,0.002238881,5.1473484e-7,0.00032289664,0.0004790326,0.00060967647,0.00006170156,0.000011047998,0.9850622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27877522,0.0004434098,0.000011643943,0.00023866385,0.00015632348,0.000009281269,0.000002197208,0.000016706988,0.72034657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981079,0.00008484803,0.0004044558,0.00036295116,0.0006501125,0.00038971117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896044,0.00011280519,0.00028273524,0.0003572775,0.00006378503,0.00022293578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033753374,0.0002687169,0.00040104587,0.000030111076,0.00015924576,0.00005909335,0.0005205593,0.00026178698,0.00039139576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000259387,0.00021815213,0.00010392731,0.000011249792,0.0005276303,0.00006503315,0.00016468682,0.00035359216,0.0000041815397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057891848,0.000011822688,0.0007456097,0.00015507507,0.000043623015,0.000057281533,0.0120138,0.0000017643569,0.000013524764,0.9771398,0.0042853886,0.005474423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024113305,0.000033607696,0.00055728963,0.00072663726,0.00009119343,0.000008042173,0.00003911783,3.0082927e-7,0.00017519356,0.017065626,0.9808094,0.00025247518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98922217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98826784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089944643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88959855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W991412592","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511996399.017","title":"Judges, bias and recusal in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Range (aeronautics); History; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07987745961855523,"score_gpt":0.22494656796141513,"score_spread":0.1450691083428599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W991412592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019113463,0.00026204382,0.0000022925801,0.00009179768,0.00019239861,0.00019662059,0.00006291198,0.000025186057,0.9972554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035128534,0.0005450214,0.000014520318,0.00007886377,0.00007467016,2.4153633e-7,0.0000055578184,0.000013760328,0.9641388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894476,0.00006565666,0.00012063315,0.0003280165,0.00026340006,0.00027753247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993047,0.00010796182,0.00010678821,0.00020399905,0.000070471,0.00020609211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018331234,0.00017793801,0.000250647,0.00008060329,0.00023093812,0.000026072661,0.00034454392,0.00019481023,0.000020483998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028230173,0.00021925391,0.00004605424,0.0000072530092,0.00032931406,0.00008764701,0.00018347001,0.0003092044,0.000004130776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037292,0.0000018494261,0.000153707,0.000027138662,0.000014187175,0.0004561036,0.00044238748,8.047885e-8,6.218404e-7,0.96059537,0.0359675,0.0023037929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012370944,0.000012701878,0.00030003942,0.00012048087,0.000050234572,0.0000027125707,0.00044218352,8.293793e-7,0.000006621261,0.00004144672,0.99864423,0.00025479865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98301035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95521384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96267676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080140715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014830403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8940915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}